ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS INC /NV/ - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended
|
September 30,
2010
|
or
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the
transition period
ended to
Commission File Number:
333-45241
|
ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
Delaware
|
22-3542636
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
165 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, New
Jersey
|
07647
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(201) 750-2646
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
|
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No
¨ The
registrant is not yet subject to this requirement.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
Filer ¨
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer ¨
|
Smaller
Reporting Company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No
x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 12, 2010 the
issuer had outstanding 97,949,973 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value
(exclusive of 100,000 shares held in treasury).
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page No.
|
|||
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and March
31, 2010 (audited)
|
F-1 – F-2
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
F-3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six
months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
F-4
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September
30, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
F-5
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-6
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
1
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
8
|
|
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
8
|
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
9
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
9
|
|
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
9
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
10
|
|
Item
4.
|
Removed
and reserved
|
10
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
10
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
11
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
15 |
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,
2010
(Unaudited)
|
March 31,
2010
(Audited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 593,853 | $ | 578,187 | ||||
Accounts
receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of -0-)
|
441,330 | 404,961 | ||||||
Inventories
(net of reserve of $494,425 and $494,425, respectively)
|
1,331,173 | 1,371,292 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
100,639 | 131,507 | ||||||
Total
Current Assets
|
2,466,995 | 2,485,947 | ||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $3,954,837 and
$3,840,279, respectively
|
3,910,418 | 4,095,814 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS – net of accumulated amortization of $-0- and $76,434,
respectively
|
554,872 | 96,407 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Investment
in Novel Laboratories, Inc.
|
3,329,322 | 3,329,322 | ||||||
Security
deposits
|
28,377 | 14,652 | ||||||
Restricted
cash – debt service for EDA bonds
|
292,416 | 294,836 | ||||||
EDA
bond offering costs, net of accumulated amortization of 71,832 and 64,767,
respectively
|
282,619 | 289,685 | ||||||
Total
Other Assets
|
3,932,734 | 4,024,902 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 10,865,019 | $ | 10,606,663 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements
F
- 1
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,
2010
(Unaudited)
|
March 31,
2010
(Audited)
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
EDA
bonds payable
|
$ | 3,385,000 | $ | 3,385,000 | ||||
Short
term loans and current portion of long-term debt
|
12,335 | 82,302 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
1,342,094 | 986,777 | ||||||
Preferred
share derivative interest payable
|
306,439 | 306,440 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
5,045,868 | 4,760,519 | ||||||
LONG
TERM LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Deferred
revenues
|
198,889 | — | ||||||
Long
term debt, less current portion
|
56,173 | 19,823 | ||||||
Derivative
liability - preferred shares
|
12,595,402 | 7,924,763 | ||||||
Derivative
liability – warrants
|
5,775,676 | 8,499,423 | ||||||
Total
Long Term Liabilities
|
18,626,140 | 16,444,009 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
23,672,008 | 21,204,528 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS
DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Common
stock – par value $0.001, Authorized
355,516,558 Issued and outstanding – 92,656,745
shares and 83,950,168 shares, respectively
|
92,657 | 83,950 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
91,591,236 | 90,903,896 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(104,184,041 | ) | (101,278,870 | ) | ||||
Treasury
stock at cost (100,000 common shares)
|
(306,841 | ) | (306,841 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
(12,806,989 | ) | (10,597,865 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
$ | 10,865,019 | $ | 10,606,663 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements
F
- 2
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED
|
SIX
MONTHS ENDED
|
|||||||||||||||
SEPTEMBER
30,
|
SEPTEMBER
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing
Fees
|
$ | 767,341 | $ | 538,941 | $ | 1,334,410 | $ | 1,204,005 | ||||||||
Royalties
|
169,901 | 237,275 | 350,935 | 386,086 | ||||||||||||
Lab
Fee Revenues
|
57,404 | — | 141,221 | — | ||||||||||||
Total
Revenues
|
994,646 | 776,216 | 1,826,566 | 1,590,091 | ||||||||||||
Costs
of Revenues
|
565,624 | 453,029 | 977,295 | 1,315,029 | ||||||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
429,022 | 323,187 | 849,271 | 275,062 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and Development
|
150,436 | 259,326 | 315,444 | 510,418 | ||||||||||||
General
and Administrative
|
379,104 | 392,100 | 635,345 | 788,637 | ||||||||||||
Non-cash
compensation through issuance of stock options
|
10,329 | 29,190 | 25,687 | 84,553 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
25,960 | 49,230 | 104,291 | 174,772 | ||||||||||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
565,829 | 729,846 | 1,080,767 | 1,558,380 | ||||||||||||
LOSS
FROM OPERATIONS
|
(136,807 | ) | (406,659 | ) | (231,496 | ) | (1,283,318 | ) | ||||||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(57,737 | ) | (61,208 | ) | (115,806 | ) | (131,188 | ) | ||||||||
Change
in fair value of warrant derivatives
|
900,047 | (1,520,822 | ) | 2,723,747 | (1,366,496 | ) | ||||||||||
Change
in fair value of preferred share derivatives
|
1,505,333 | (1,383,231 | ) | (4,569,005 | ) | 1,178,296 | ||||||||||
Interest
expense attributable to preferred share derivatives
|
(306,440 | ) | (299,352 | ) | (670,359 | ) | (658,373 | ) | ||||||||
Discount
in Series E issuance attributable to beneficial conversion
features
|
(39,132 | ) | — | (39,132 | ) | (258,700 | ) | |||||||||
Total
Other Income (Expense)
|
2,002,071 | (3,264,613 | ) | (2,670,555 | ) | (1,236,461 | ) | |||||||||
INCOME
(LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
1,865,264 | (3,671,272 | ) | (2,902,051 | ) | (2,519,779 | ) | |||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1,040 | 1,040 | 3,120 | 1,040 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
|
$ | 1,864,224 | $ | (3,672,312 | ) | $ | (2,905,171 | ) | $ | (2,520,819 | ) | |||||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.01 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
92,367,680 | 74,075,307 | 89,760,532 | 70,232,854 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
299,999,783 | 74,075,307 | 89,760,532 | 70,232,854 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements
F
- 3
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Stockholders’
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2010
|
83,950,168 | $ | 83,950 | $ | 90,903,896 | 100,000 | $ | (306,841 | ) | $ | (101,278,870 | ) | $ | (10,597,865 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
(2,905,171 | ) | (2,905,171 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
shares issued in lieu of cash in payment of preferred share derivative
interest expense
|
8,706,577 | 8,707 | 661,653 | 670,360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-cash
compensation through the issuance of stock options
|
25,687 | 25,687 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
92,656,745 | $ | 92,657 | $ | 91,591,236 | 100,000 | $ | (306,841 | ) | $ | (104,184,041 | ) | $ | (12,806,989 | ) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements
F
- 4
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
|
||||||||
2010
(Unaudited)
|
2009
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (2,905,171 | ) | $ | (2,520,819 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities
:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
241,626 | 251,936 | ||||||
Inventory
adjustment
|
— | 311,986 | ||||||
Change
in fair value of warrant derivative liability
|
(2,723,747 | ) | 1,366,496 | |||||
Change
in fair value of preferred share derivative liability
|
4,569,005 | (1,178,296 | ) | |||||
Discount
in Series E issuance attributable to embedded beneficial conversion
feature
|
39,132 | 258,700 | ||||||
Preferred
share derivative interest satisfied by the issuance of common
stock
|
670,360 | 658.373 | ||||||
Non-cash
compensation satisfied by the issuance of common stock and
options
|
25,687 | 84,553 | ||||||
Non-cash
lease accretion
|
298 | — | ||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities :
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(36,372 | ) | (357,348 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
40,120 | (63,109 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
30,868 | 12,211 | ||||||
Security
deposit
|
(13,725 | ) | 12,909 | |||||
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
217,817 | 105,224 | ||||||
Deferred
Revenues
|
198,889 | — | ||||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY / (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
354,788 | (1,057,184 | ) | |||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(23,779 | ) | — | |||||
Cost
of capital leasehold improvements
|
(35,610 | ) | — | |||||
Costs
incurred for intellectual property assets
|
(258,464 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of retired equipment
|
30,000 | — | ||||||
Withdrawals
from restricted cash, net
|
2,420 | 214,002 | ||||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY / (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(285,433 | ) | 214,002 | |||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Other
loan payments
|
(53,689 | ) | (48,953 | ) | ||||
NJEDA
bond principal payments
|
— | (210,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from issuance of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock and
Warrants
|
— | 1,000,000 | ||||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY / (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
(53,869 | ) | 741,047 | |||||
NET
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
15,666 | (102,135 | ) | |||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – beginning of period
|
578,187 | 282,578 | ||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – end of period
|
$ | 593,853 | $ | 180,443 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
115,524 | 133,200 | ||||||
Cash
paid for taxes
|
3,120 | 1,040 | ||||||
SCHEDULE
OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Non-Cash
acquisition of Naltrexone ANDA
|
$ | 200,000 | — |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements
F
- 5
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE
AND SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1
|
- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
AND LIQUIDITY
|
|
The
information in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes the results of
operations of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) for the three and six months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted for interim
financial statement presentation. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the
periods presented have been
included.
|
|
The
financial results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the full year or future interim
periods.
|
|
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended March 31, 2010. There have been no changes in significant
accounting policies since March 31,
2010.
|
The
Company does not anticipate being profitable for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2011; therefore a current provision for income tax was not established for
the three and six months ended September 30, 2010. Only the minimum liability
required for state corporation taxes was considered.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared
on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going
concern. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had a working capital
deficit of $2.6 million, losses from operations totaling $0.2 million for the
six months ended September 30, 2010, other expenses totaling $2.7 million for
the six months ended and a net loss of $2.9 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2010.
In
addition, the Company has received Notice of Default from the Trustee of the
NJED Bonds as a result of the utilization of the debt service reserve being used
to pay interest payments due on September 1, 2009, March 1, 2010 and September
1, 2010 totaling $121k, $113k and $113k, respectively, and principal payments
due on September 1, 2009 totaling $210k. The debt service reserve was
utilized to make such payments as a result of the Company’s not having
sufficient funds available to make such payments when due.
The
Company did not have sufficient funds available to make the principal payments
due on September 1, 2010, totaling $200k and requested that the Trustee withdraw
such funds from the debt service reserve. The Company’s request was
denied and accordingly the principal payment due on September 1, 2010, totaling
$200k was not made.
The
Company has requested a postponement of principal payments due on September 1,
2010, 2011 and 2012, with an aggregate of all such postponed principal payments
being added to the principal payments due on September 1,
2013. Resolution of the Company’s default on the NJEDA Bonds and our
request for postponement of principal payments will have a significant effect on
our ability to operate in the future.
Please
refer to Note 5 to our financial statements for a more detailed discussion of
the NJEDA Bonds and Notice of Default. Please also note that the
working capital deficit of $2.6 million as of September 30, 2010, includes the
entire principal amount due in relation to the NJEDA Bonds. This
amount, totaling $3.4 million was first classified as a current liability as of
March 31, 2010, due to the Notice of Default received from the Trustee in
relation to the NJEDA Bonds.
As of
September 30, 2010, we had cash reserves of $593,853. The completion
of all transactions contemplated by the Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement,
including the consummation of the third closing thereof, is expected to provide
additional funds to permit us to continue development of our product pipeline
for more than two years. Beyond two years, we anticipate that, with
growth of Lodrane and the launch of the generic Hydromorphone 8mg and Naltrexone
50mg recently acquired pursuant to asset purchase agreements with Mikah Pharma
LLC, Elite could be profitable. In addition, the
commercialization of the products developed at the Facility under the Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement is expected to add a new revenue source for Elite.
However, there can be no assurances as to the growth, success of development or
commercialization of these products.
F
- 6
Despite
the successful completion of the initial and second closings of the Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement, there can be no assurances that we will be able to
consummate the third closing pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement. If such transactions are consummated,
we will receive additional cash proceeds of $1.6875 million (which will include
quarterly payments of $62,500 for a period of 11 quarters). Even if
we were able to successfully complete the third closing of the Epic Strategic
Alliance Agreement, we still may be required to seek additional capital in the
future and there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain such
additional capital on favorable terms, if at all. For additional information
regarding the Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement, please see our disclosures
under “Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement” in Item 7 of Part II of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and in our Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC
on March 23, 2009, May 6, 2009, June 5, 2009 and July 1, 2010, which disclosures
are incorporated herein by reference.
NOTE 2
|
-
CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist
of cash on deposit with banks and money market instruments. The Company places
its cash and cash equivalents with high-quality, U.S. financial institutions
and, to date, has not experienced losses on any of its balances.
NOTE 3
|
- INVENTORIES
|
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market (net
realizable value).
NOTE 4
|
-
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
Costs to
acquire intangible assets, such as asset purchases of Abbreviated New Drug
Applications (“ANDA’s”) which are approved by the FDA or costs incurred in the
application of patents are capitalized and amortized on the straight-line
method, based on their estimated useful lives ranging from five to fifteen
years, commencing upon approval of the patent or site transfers required for
commercialization of an acquired ANDA. Such costs are charged to
expense if the patent application or ANDA site transfer is
unsuccessful.
As of
September 30, 2010, the following costs were recorded as intangible assets on
the Company’s balance sheet:
Intangible assets at March 31, 2010
(audited)
|
||||
Patent
application costs
|
96,407 | |||
ANDA
acquisitions
|
— | |||
Intangible asset costs capitalized during the six
months ended September 30, 2010
|
||||
Patent
application costs
|
33,465 | |||
ANDA
acquisition costs
|
425,000 | |||
Amortization of intangible assets during the six
months ended September 30, 2010
|
||||
Patent
application costs
|
— | |||
ANDA
acquisition costs
|
— | |||
Intangible assets at September 30, 2010
(unaudited)
|
||||
Patent
application costs
|
129,872 | |||
ANDA
acquisition costs
|
425,000 | |||
Total
|
$ | 554,872 |
The costs
incurred in patent applications totaling $16,753 and $33,465 for the three and
six months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, were all related to our abuse
resistant and extended release opioid product lines. The Company is
continuing its efforts to achieve approval of such
patents. Additional costs incurred in relation to such patent
applications will be capitalized as intangible assets, with amortization of such
costs to commence upon approval of the patents.
F
- 7
The ANDA
acquisition costs of $425,000 incurred during the six months ended September 30,
2010, are related to our acquisition of the ANDA’s for Hydromorphone 8mg and
Naltrexone 50mg. Please refer to the current reports on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 24, 2010 for the Hydromorphone ANDA acquisition and
September 1, 2010 for the Naltrexone ANDA acquisition, such filings being herein
incorporated by this reference for further details on this
acquisition. In addition, please refer to exhibits 10.4 and 10.5 of
the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 15, 2010 for
the purchase agreements for Hydromorphone and Naltrexone, respectively, such
filings being herein incorporated by this reference. The Company is
in the process of complying with all FDA and DEA requirements which are a
prerequisite to achieving our manufacture and commercialization of the
Hydromorphone 8mg ANDA. Amortization of the costs incurred to acquire
the ANDA is to commence upon the Company’s commercialization of
such.
NOTE 5
|
- NJEDA
BONDS
|
On August
31, 2005, the Company successfully completed a refinancing of a prior 1999 bond
issue through the issuance of new tax-exempt bonds (the “Bonds”). The
refinancing involved borrowing $4,155,000, evidenced by a 6.5% Series A Note in
the principal amount of $3,660,000 maturing on September 1, 2030 and a 9% Series
B Note in the principal amount of $495,000 maturing on September 1, 2012. The
net proceeds, after payment of issuance costs, were used (i) to redeem the
outstanding tax-exempt Bonds originally issued by the Authority on September 2,
1999, (ii) refinance other equipment financing and (iii) for the purchase of
certain equipment to be used in the manufacture of pharmaceutical
products.
Interest
is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1 of each year. The Bonds are
collateralized by a first lien on the Company’s facility and equipment acquired
with the proceeds of the original and refinanced Bonds. The related Indenture
requires the maintenance of a $415,500 Debt Service Reserve Fund consisting of
$366,000 from the Series A Notes proceeds and $49,500 from the Series B Notes
proceeds. The Debt Service Reserve is maintained in restricted cash accounts
that are classified in Other Assets. $1,274,311 of the proceeds had been
deposited in a short-term restricted cash account to fund the purchase of
manufacturing equipment and development of the Company’s facility. As of
September 30, 2010, all of these proceeds were utilized to upgrade the Company’s
manufacturing facilities and for the purchase of manufacturing and laboratory
equipment.
Bond
issue costs of $354,000 were paid from the bond proceeds and are being amortized
over the life of the bonds. Amortization of bond issuance costs amounted to
$3,533 and $7,065 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively. Amortization of bond issuance costs amounted to $3,533
and $7,065 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively.
The NJED
Bonds require the Company to make an annual principal payment on September
1st
of varying amounts as specified in the loan documents and semi-annual interest
payments on March 1st and
September 1st, equal
to interest due on the outstanding principal at the applicable rate for the
semi-annual period just ended.
The
interest payments due on September 1, 2009, March 31, 2010 and September 1,
2010, totaling $120,775, $113,075 and $113,075, respectively were paid from the
debt service reserve held in the restricted cash account, due to the Company not
having sufficient funds to make such payments when due.
The
principal payment due on September 1, 2009, totaling $210,000 was paid from the
debt service reserve held in the restricted cash account, due to the Company not
having sufficient funds to make the payment when due. The Company did
not have sufficient funds available to make the principal payments due on
September 1, 2010 totaling $200,000, and requested the Trustee to withdraw the
funds from debt service reserve held in the restricted cash account and to
utilize such funds to make the principal payment due. The Company’s
request was denied by the Trustee. Accordingly, the principal payment
due on September 1, 2010, totaling $200,000 was not made.
Pursuant
to the terms of the NJED Bonds, the Company is required to replenish any amounts
withdrawn from the debt service reserve and used to make principal or interest
payments in six monthly installments, each being equal to one-sixth of the
amount withdrawn and with the first installment due on the 15th of the
month in which the withdrawal from debt service reserve occurred and the
remaining five monthly payments being due on the 15th of the
five immediately subsequent months. The Company has, to date, made all payments
required in relation to the withdrawals made from the debt service reserve on
September 1, 2009, March 1, 2010 and September 1, 2010. The Company
is required to make four additional monthly payments of $19,330 during the
period November 15, 2010 through February 15, 2011, in order to fully replenish
the September 1, 2010 withdrawal from the debt service reserve.
F
- 8
The
Company does not expect to have sufficient available funds to make the interest
payment of $113,075 due on March 1, 2011 as well as the principal payment of
$200,000 which was due, but not paid, on September 1, 2010
The
Company has received Notice of Default from the Trustee of the NJED Bonds in
relation to the withdrawals from the debt service reserve, and has requested a
postponement of principal payments due on September 1st of
2010, 2011 and 2012, with an aggregate of all such postponed principal payments
being added to the principal payments due on September 1,
2013. Resolution of the Company’s default under the NJED Bonds and
our request for postponement of principal payments will have a significant
effect on our ability to operate in the future.
Due to
issuance of a Notice of Default being received from the Trustee of the NJED
Bonds, and until the event of default is waived or rescinded, the Company has
classified the entire principal due, an amount aggregating $3.385 million, as a
current liability.
NOTE 6
|
- DERIVATIVE
LIABILITIES
|
Accounting
Standard Codification “ASC” 815 – Derivatives and Hedging,
which provides guidance on determining what types of instruments or embedded
features in an instrument issued by a reporting entity can be considered indexed
to its own stock for the purpose of evaluating the first criteria of the scope
exception in the pronouncement on accounting for derivatives. These
requirements can affect the accounting for warrants and convertible preferred
instruments issued by the Company. As the conversion features within,
and the detachable warrants issued with the Company’s Series B, Series C, Series
D and Series E Preferred Stock, do not have fixed settlement provisions because
their conversion and exercise prices may be lowered if the Company issues
securities at lower prices in the future, we have concluded that the instruments
are not indexed to the Company’s stock and are to be treated as derivative
liabilities.
Preferred Stock Derivative
Liabilities
Series B
|
Series C
|
Series D
|
Series E
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
shares Outstanding
|
896 | 5,418 | 9,008 | 2,062.5 | 17,384.5 | |||||||||||||||
Underlying
common shares into which Preferred may convert
|
574,076 | 3,365,217 | 128,692,014 | 77,292,061 | 209,923,369 | |||||||||||||||
Closing
price on valuation date
|
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||||
Preferred
stock derivative liability at September 30, 2010
|
$ | 34,445 | $ | 201,913 | $ | 7,721,521 | $ | 4,637,524 | $ | 12,595,402 | ||||||||||
Preferred
stock derivative liability at June 30, 2010
|
$ | 39,037 | $ | 228,835 | $ | 8,751,057 | $ | 4,980,172 | $ | 13,999,102 | ||||||||||
Preferred
stock derivative liability at March 31, 2010
|
$ | 48,796 | $ | 286,043 | $ | 3,828,587 | $ | 3,761,761 | $ | 7,925,187 | ||||||||||
Change
in preferred stock derivative liability for the three months ended
September 20, 2010
|
$ | (1,505,333 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Change
in preferred stock derivative liability for the six months ended September
20, 2010
|
$ | 4,569,005 |
Warrant Derivative
Liabilities
The
portion of derivative liabilities related to outstanding warrants was valued
using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following assumptions on
the following dates:
March 31
2010
|
June 30
2010
|
September 30
2010
|
||||||||||
Risk-Free
interest rate
|
2.4% - 3.3 | % | 0.3% - 2.4 | % | 0.3% - 1.6 | % | ||||||
Expected
volatility
|
126% - 214 | % | 120% - 210 | % | 135% - 194 | % | ||||||
Expected
life (in years)
|
0.5 – 6.6 | 0.3 – 6.3 | 0.0 – 6.1 | |||||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
Number
of warrants
|
125,299,740 | 125,299,740 | 125,116,392 | |||||||||
Fair
value – Warrant Derivative Liability
|
$ | 8,499,423 | $ | 6,675,722 | $ | 5,775,676 | ||||||
Change
in warrant derivative liability for the three months ended
|
$ | (1,823,701 | ) | $ | (900,046 | ) | ||||||
Change
in warrant derivative liability for the six months ended
|
$ | (2,723,747 | ) |
F
- 9
The risk
free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal
Reserve. The expected volatility was based on the historical
volatility of the Company’s share price for periods equal to the expected life
of the outstanding warrants at each valuation date. The expected
dividend rate was based on the fact that the Company has not historically paid
dividends on common stock and does not expect to pay dividends on common stock
in the future.
NOTE 7
|
- PREFERRED
SHARE DERIVATIVE INTEREST
PAYABLE
|
Preferred
share derivative interest payable as of September 30, 2010 consisted of $306,440
in derivative interest accrued as of September 30, 2010. The full
amount of derivative interest payable as of September 30, 2010 was paid via the
issuance of 5,293,228 shares of common stock in October 2010.
NOTE 8
|
- OPERATING
LEASES
|
The
Company entered into a lease for a portion of a one-story warehouse, located at
135 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, New Jersey, consisting of approximately 15,000
square feet of floor space. The lease term begins on July 1, 2010 and is
classified as an operating lease. The lease includes an initial term of 5 years
and 6 months and we have the option to renew the lease for two additional terms,
each of 5 years. The property related to this lease will be used for the storage
of pharmaceutical finished goods, raw materials, equipment and documents as well
as engaging in manufacturing, packaging and distribution
activities.
This
property requires significant leasehold improvements and qualification as a
prerequisite to achieving suitability for such intended future use. It is
expected that approximately 3,500 square feet of this property will be
constructed and qualified as suitable for use for storage of pharmaceutical
finished goods, raw materials, equipment and documents on or before the
expiration of the lease for the current warehouse at 80 Oak Street.
Leasehold
improvements and qualification as suitable for manufacturing, packaging and
distribution operations are expected to be achieved within two years from the
beginning of the lease term. These are estimates based on current project plans,
which are subject to change. There can be no assurance that the construction and
qualification will be accomplished during the estimated time frames, or that the
property located at 135 Ludlow Avenue, Northvale, New Jersey will ever achieve
qualification for intended future utilization.
Minimum 5
year payments* for the leasing of 15,000 square feet at 135 Ludlow are as
follows:
Fiscal
year ended March 31, 2011
|
$ | 19,689 | ||
Fiscal
year ended March 31, 2012
|
79,248 | |||
Fiscal
year ended March 31, 2013
|
81,228 | |||
Fiscal
year ended March 31, 2014
|
83,259 | |||
Fiscal
year ended March 31, 2015
|
85,344 | |||
Total
Minimum 5 year lease payments
|
$ | 348,768 |
* Minimum
lease payments are exclusive of additional expenses related to certain expenses
incurred in the operation and maintenance of the premises, including, without
limitation, real estate taxes and common area charges which may be due under the
terms and conditions of the lease, but which are not quantifiable at the time of
filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
F
- 10
Rent
expense relating to the operating lease is recorded using the straight line
method, and is summarized as follows:
Three Months
Ended
Sept 30, 2010
|
Six Months
Ended
Sept 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Rent
Expense
|
$ | 22,584 | $ | 22,584 | ||||
Change
in deferred rent liability
|
22,584 | 22,584 | ||||||
Balance
of deferred rent liability (long-term liability)
|
22,584 | 22,584 |
NOTE 9
|
- DEFERRED
REVENUES
|
Deferred
revenue in the amount of $198,889 represents the unamortized amount of a
$200,000 advance payment received for a licensing agreement with a fifteen year
term beginning in September 2010 and ending in August 2025. The
advance payment was recorded as deferred revenue when received and is earned, on
a straight line basis over the fifteen year life of the license.
NOTE 10
|
- STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
Common
Stock
During
the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 4,482,629 shares
of common stock in lieu of cash in payment of interest expense, totaling
$306,440 due and owing as of June 30, 2010 to holders of the Company’s Series B,
Series C and Series D Preferred Share derivative instruments.
During
the six months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 8,706,577 shares of
common stock in lieu of cash in payment of interest expense, totaling $612,880,
to holders of the Company’s Series B, Series C and Series D Preferred Share
derivative instruments.
Options
At
September 30, 2010, the Company had 1,666,999 options fully vested and
outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $3.00 per share; each
option representing the right to purchase one share of common
stock. In addition, there are 1,390,001 options issued pursuant to
the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan which are outstanding and not vested, with
exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $2.50 per share. These options
are scheduled to vest in equal annual increments on January 18, 2011, 2012 and
2013 or upon the occurrence of certain defined events and require that employees
awarded such options be employed by the Company on the vesting
date.
NOTE 11
|
- PER
SHARE INFORMATION
|
Basic
earnings per share of common stock (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing the net
(loss) income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding. Diluted earnings per share of common stock (“Diluted
EPS”) is computed by dividing the net (loss) income by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock, and dilutive common stock equivalents and
convertible securities then outstanding. GAAP requires the
presentation of both Basic and Diluted EPS, if such Diluted EPS is not
anti-dilutive, on the face of Company’s Condensed Statements of
Operations. Diluted earnings per share is not presented for the six
months ended September 30, 2010, because the effect of the Company’s common
stock equivalents is anti-dilutive.
For the
Three Months
Ended
September 30, 2010
|
For the
Six months
Ended
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Numerator
|
||||||||
Net
Income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
$ | 1,864,224 | $ | (2,905,171 | ) | |||
Denominator
|
||||||||
Weighted-average
shares of common stock outstanding
|
92,367,680 | 89,760,532 | ||||||
Dilutive
effect of stock options, warrants and convertible
securities
|
207,632,103 | |||||||
Net
(loss) income per share
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.01 |
F
- 11
NOTE 12
|
- SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
The Company has evaluated subsequent
events from the balance sheet date through November 15, 2010, the date the
accompanying financial statements were issued. The following are
material subsequent events:
Common
shares issued in lieu of cash in payment of derivative interest
expense
Derivative interest expense related to
the Preferred Share derivatives due and payable as of September 30, 2010 were
paid during October 2010 through the issuance of 5,293,228 shares of common
stock.
Approval of NOL Sale
application by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority
(“NJ-EDA”)
The
Company has been notified that its application to the NJ-EDA for sale of New
Jersey net-operating losses under the Technology Business Tax Certificate
Transfer Program has been approved. At the time of filing of this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the amount of net-operating losses approved for
sale has not yet been communicated to the Company. The Company
anticipates that such amount will be known prior to the end of the current
fiscal year and that the actual sale of such net-operating losses approved for
sale will also occur prior to the end of the current fiscal
year.
F
- 12
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE
AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
COMPARED
TO THE
THREE
AND SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
The
following discussion and analysis should be read with the financial statements
and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in the Annual
Report. It is intended to assist the reader in understanding and evaluating our
financial position.
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein contain
“forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause
the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry
results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. When used
in this Form 10-Q, statements that are not statements of current or historical
fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting
the foregoing, the words “plan”, “intend”, “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe”,
“could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” or “continue” or similar expressions or other
variations or comparable terminology are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Any
reference to “Elite”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Registrant”
refers to Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Overview
We are a
specialty pharmaceutical company principally engaged in the development and
manufacture of oral, controlled-release products, using proprietary technology
and generic pharmaceuticals. Our strategy includes improving off-patent drug
products for life cycle management and developing generic versions of
controlled-release drug products with high barriers to entry. Our technology is
applicable to the development of delayed-, sustained- or targeted-release
pellets, capsules, tablets, granules and powders.
We have
two products, Lodrane 24® and Lodrane 24D®, currently being sold
commercially. We also have an approved generic methadone product
developed with our partner, The PharmaNetwork. We are pursuing a
sales and distribution agreement for this product. A sales and
distribution agreement is a prerequisite for the launch of this product and must
be mutually agreed upon by Elite and our development partner. Elite
has purchased two approved generic products: a generic hydromorphone product and
a generic naltrexone product. In addition, Elite has purchased a generic product
for which an ANDA has been previously filed but not yet approved by the
FDA. The manufacturing process transfer for all three recently
acquired products from the previous ANDA holders and filers to our facilities in
Northvale, New Jersey, is currently on-going. Elite also executed a
License Agreement with Precision Dose, Inc. (“Precision Dose”) to market and
sell the Elite products in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada through
its wholly-owned subsidiary, TAGI Pharma Inc. (“TAGI”). TAGI will
market the two approved and on approval-pending product recently purchased by
the Company as well as additional products and dosage strengths that have or
will be filed for approval with the FDA. The Company also has a
pipeline of additional generic drug candidates under active
development. Additionally, the Company is developing ELI-216, an
abuse resistant oxycodone product, and ELI-154, a once-daily oxycodone
product. Elite’s facility in Northvale, New Jersey operates under
Current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) and is a United States Drug
Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) registered facility for research, development and
manufacturing.
Strategy
Elite is
focusing its efforts on the following areas: (i) development of Elite’s pain
management products, (ii) manufacturing of Lodrane 24® and Lodrane 24D®
products; (iii) set up and launch of approved generic products; (iv) the
development of the other products in our pipeline including the eight products
pursuant to the Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement; (v) commercial exploitation
of our products either by license and the collection of royalties, or through
the manufacture of our formulations, and (vi) development of new products and
the expansion of our licensing agreements with other pharmaceutical companies,
including co-development projects, joint ventures and other
collaborations.
1
Elite is
focusing on the development of various types of drug products, including branded
drug products which require new drug applications (“NDAs”) under Section
505(b)(1) or 505(b)(2) of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration
Act of 1984 (the “Drug Price Competition Act”) as well as generic drug products
which require abbreviated new drug applications (“ANDAs”).
Elite
believes that its business strategy enables it to reduce risk by having a
diverse product portfolio that includes both branded and generic products in
various therapeutic categories and to build collaborations and establish
licensing agreements with companies with greater resources thereby allowing us
to share costs of development and improve cash-flow.
Commercial
Products
Elite
manufactures two once-daily allergy products, Lodrane 24® and Lodrane 24D®, that
were co-developed with our partner, ECR Pharmaceuticals (“ECR”). Elite
entered into development agreements for these two products with ECR in June 2001
whereby Elite agreed to commercially develop two products in exchange for
development fees, certain payments, royalties and manufacturing rights. The
products are being marketed by ECR which also has the responsibility for
regulatory matters. In addition to receiving revenues for the
manufacture of these products, Elite receives a royalty on in-market
sales.
Lodrane
24®, was first commercially offered in November 2004 and Lodrane 24D® was first
commercially offered in December 2006. Elite’s revenues for
manufacturing these products and a royalty on sales for the quarters ended
September, 2010 and 2009 aggregated $937,242 and, $776,216,
respectively. Elite’s revenues for manufacturing these products and a
royalty on sales for the six month periods ended September, 2010 and 2009
aggregated $1,826,566 and, $1,590,091, respectively.
Since
January, 2010, the Company has performed laboratory stability studies of Lodrane
and Lodrane 24D, for ECR, on a contract basis. Elite’s revenues from
such contract laboratory services for the six months ended September 30, 2010
were $141,221.
Approved
Products
On
November 25, 2009, the Company and ThePharmaNetwork, LLC (“TPN”) were notified
of the approval of an Abbreviated New Drug Application for methadone
hydrochloride 10mg tablets by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(“FDA”). Elite and TPN co-developed the product and the ANDA was
filed under the TPN name. A current report on form 8-K was filed on
December 2, 2009 in relation to this announcement, such filing being
incorporated herein by this reference.
On May
18, 2010, Elite executed an asset purchase agreement with Mikah Pharma LLC.
Under that agreement we completed the acquisition from Mikah of an Abbreviated
New Drug Application (Hydromorphone Hydrochloride Tablets USP, 8 mg) for
aggregate consideration of $225,000, comprised of an initial payment of
$150,000, which was made on May 18, 2010. A second payment of $75,000
was due to be paid to Mikah on June 15, 2010 and is recorded in accounts payable
as of September 30, 2010. The Company may, at its election, make this
payment in cash or by issuing to Mikah 937,500 shares of the Company’s common
stock. Elite is transferring the process to the Facility in
Northvale, NJ where it intends to manufacture the product. A current
report on form 8-K was filed on May 24, 2010 in relation to this announcement,
such filing being incorporated herein by this reference.
On August
27, 2010, Elite executed the Naltrexone Asset Purchase Agreement with Mikah
pursuant to which Elite acquired from Mikah the Abbreviated New Drug Application
number 75-274 (Naltrexone Hydrochloride Tablets USP, 50 mg), and all amendments
thereto (the “ANDA”), that have to date been filed with the FDA seeking
authorization and approval to manufacture, package, ship and sell the products
described in the ANDA within the United States and its territories (including
Puerto Rico) for aggregate consideration of $200,000. In lieu of
cash, Mikah agreed to accept from Elite product development services to be
performed by Elite, as described below under Product Development Agreement
heading. A current report on form
8-K was filed on August 27, 2010 in relation to this announcement, such filing
being incorporated herein by this reference.
Products
Pending FDA Approval of Previously Filed ANDA
On
September 10, 2010, Elite, together with its subsidiary, Elite Laboratories,
Inc., executed a Purchase Agreement with Epic Pharma LLC (the “Seller”) for the
purpose of acquiring from the seller an Abbreviated New Drug Application
(“ANDA”) for a generic product. The ANDA has been filed with the FDA and seeks
authorization and approval to manufacture, package, ship and sell the
product. The acquisition of the ANDA will close on the later of 60
days from the date of the Purchase Agreement or upon receipt of FDA approval of
the ANDA. Upon the closing, Elite will pay a portion of the purchase
price. The remainder of the purchase price will be paid in quarterly
installments over a period of three years, beginning at the end of the first
full quarter following the closing. A current report on form
8-K was filed on September 10, 2010 in relation to this announcement, such
filing being incorporated herein by this reference.
2
Licensing
Agreement
On
September 10, 2010, Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Elite”) executed a License
Agreement with Precision Dose, Inc. (“Precision Dose”) to market and sell four
Elite generic products, consisting of Hydromorphone, Naltrexone, and two generic
products for which ANDA’s have been filed but not yet approved by the FDA.,
through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TAGI Pharma, Inc. in the United States,
Puerto Rico and Canada. Precision Dose will have the exclusive right
to market the products in the United States and Puerto Rico and a non-exclusive
right to market the products in Canada. Pursuant to the License
Agreement, Elite will receive a license fee and milestone
payments. The license fee will be computed as a percentage of the
gross profit, as defined in the License Agreement, earned by Precision Dose as a
result of sales of the products. The license fee is payable monthly
for the term of the License Agreement. The milestone payments will be
paid in 6 installments. The first installment was paid upon execution
of the License Agreement. The remaining installments are to be paid
upon FDA approval and initial shipment of the products to Precision
Dose. The term of the License Agreement is 15 years and may be
extended for 3 successive terms, each of 5 years. A current report on form
8-K was filed on September 10, 2010 in relation to this announcement, such
filing being incorporated herein by this reference.
Products
Under Development
It is our
general policy not to disclose products in our development pipeline or the
status of such products until a product reaches a stage that we determine, for
competitive reasons, in our discretion, to be appropriate for disclosure and
because the disclosure of such information might suggest the occurrence of
future matters or events that may not occur.
ELI-154
and ELI-216
For
ELI-154, Elite has developed a once-daily oxycodone formulation using its
proprietary technology. An investigational new drug application, or IND, has
been filed and Elite has completed two pharmacokinetic studies in healthy
subjects that compared blood levels of oxycodone from dosing ELI-154 and the
twice-a-day product that is on the market currently, OxyContin® marketed in the
U.S. by Purdue Pharma LP. These studies confirmed that ELI-154, when
compared to twice-daily delivery, demonstrated an equivalent onset, more
constant blood levels of the drug over the 24 hour period and equivalent blood
levels to the twice-a-day product at the end of 24 hours. Elite has
successfully manufactured multiple batches on commercial scale equipment and we
have discussions ongoing in Europe for this product. We are looking
for a partner who can complete the clinical studies required for Europe and who
can sell and distribute the product in key European
territories.
ELI-216
utilizes our patent-pending abuse-deterrent technology that is based on a
pharmacological approach. ELI-216 is a combination of a narcotic agonist,
oxycodone hydrochloride, in a sustained-release formulation intended for use in
patients with moderate to severe chronic pain, and an antagonist, naltrexone
hydrochloride, formulated to deter abuse of the drug. Both of these
compounds, oxycodone hydrochloride and naltrexone hydrochloride, have been on
the market for a number of years and sold separately in various dose
strengths. Elite has filed an IND for the product and has tested the
product in a series of pharmacokinetic studies. In single-dose
studies for ELI-216, it was demonstrated that no quantifiable blood levels of
naltrexone hydrochloride were released at a limit of quantification (“LOQ”) of 7.5
pg/ml. As described below, when crushed, naltrexone hydrochloride was
released at levels that would be expected to eliminate the euphoria from the
crushed oxycodone hydrochloride. This data is consistent with the
premise of Elite’s abuse resistant technology, or ART, that essentially no
naltrexone is released and absorbed when administered as
intended. Products utilizing the pharmacological approach to deter
abuse such as Suboxone®, a product marketed in the United States by Reckitt
Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Embeda®, a product marketed in the United
States by King Pharmaceuticals, have been approved by the FDA and are being
marketed in the United States.
ELI-216
demonstrates a euphoria-blocking effect when the product is
crushed. A study completed in 2007 was designed to determine
the optimal ratio of oxycodone hydrochloride and the opioid antagonist,
naltrexone hydrochloride, to significantly block the euphoric effect of the
opioid if the product is abused by physically altering it (i.e., crushing).
The study also helped determine the appropriate levels of naltrexone
hydrochloride required to reduce or eliminate the euphoria experienced by
subjects who might take crushed product to achieve a “high”.
3
Elite met
with the FDA for a Type C clinical guidance meeting regarding the NDA
development program for ELI-216. Elite has incorporated the FDA’s guidance
into its developmental plan. Elite has obtained a special protocol
assessment, or SPA, with the FDA for the ELI-216 Phase III protocol. Elite will
conduct additional Phase I studies including, but not limited to, food effect,
ascending dose and multi-dose studies.
Elite has
developed ELI-154 and ELI-216 and retains the rights to these
products. Elite has currently chosen to develop these products itself
but expects to license these products at a later date to a third party who could
provide funding for the remaining clinical studies, including a Phase III study,
and who could provide sales and distribution for the product. The drug delivery
technology underlying ELI-154 was originally developed under a joint venture
with Elan which terminated in 2002.
According
to the Elan Termination Agreement, Elite acquired all proprietary, development
and commercial rights for the worldwide markets for the products developed by
the joint venture, including ELI-154. Upon licensing or commercialization of
ELI-154, Elite will pay a royalty to Elan pursuant to the Termination
Agreement. If Elite were to sell the product itself, Elite will pay a
1% royalty to Elan based on the product’s net sales, and if Elite enters into an
agreement with another party to sell the product, Elite will pay a 9% royalty to
Elan based on Elite’s net revenues from this product. (Elite’s net product
revenues would include license fees, royalties, manufacturing profits and
milestones) Elite is allowed to recoup all development costs including research,
process development, analytical development, clinical development and regulatory
costs before payment of any royalties to Elan.
Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement
On March
18, 2009, Elite and Epic Pharma, LLC and Epic Investments, LLC, a subsidiary of
Epic Pharma LLC (collectively, “Epic”) entered into the Epic Strategic Alliance
Agreement (amended on April 30, 2009, June 1, 2009 and July 28, 2009). Epic is a
pharmaceutical company that operates a business synergistic to that of Elite in
the research and development, manufacturing and sales and marketing of oral
immediate release and controlled-release drug products.
Under the
Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement (i) at least eight additional generic drug
products will be developed by Epic at the Facility with the intent of filing
abbreviated new drug applications for obtaining FDA approval of such generic
drugs, (ii) Elite will be entitled to 15% of the profits generated from the
sales of such additional generic drug products upon approval by the FDA, and
(iii) Epic and Elite will share certain resources, technology and know-how in
the development of drug products, which Elite believes will benefit the
continued development of its current drug products.
For
additional information regarding the Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement, please
see our disclosures under “Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement” in Item 7 of Part
II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in our Current Reports on Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on March 23, 2009, May 6, 2009 and June 5, 2009, which are
incorporated herein by reference.
Product
Development Agreement
On August
27, 2010, Elite Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Elite”) executed an agreement with Mikah
Pharma, LLC (“Mikah”) to undertake and perform development work to facilitate
the preparation of a regulatory filing for a product under development (the
“Product Development Agreement”). The product will be formulated with
a previously approved drug substance and will be designed to be delivered in a
unique delivery profile. Among other responsibilities, Elite will
provide formulation, analytical development, clinical batch manufacture and
validation work for the product. The parties agreed that, in lieu of
cash, the transfer to Elite of the Naltrexone product in accordance with the
terms of the Naltrexone Asset Purchase Agreement (see discussion at Item 2.01
below), which they valued at $200,000, constituted the consideration for the
development services being performed by Elite under the Product Development
Agreement. Mikah will also pay to Elite, on a quarterly basis, a
royalty in the amount of 5% of net sales of the product. The royalty
will be due and payable for the duration of the period beginning on the date
that the product is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration
(the “FDA”) and ending on the date of the introduction into the market of an
equivalent generic product. Upon approval of the new drug application
by the FDA, Elite will manufacture the product and the parties will negotiate in
good faith a manufacturing and supply agreement for the product. The Product
Development Agreement has a term of 10 years. There is no guarantee
that the product will receive approval from the FDA. A current report on form
8-K was filed on September 1, 2010 in relation to this announcement, such filing
being incorporated herein by this reference.
4
Novel
Labs Investment
At the
end of 2006, Elite entered into an agreement with VGS Pharma, LLC (“VGS”) and created Novel
Laboratories, Inc. (“Novel”), a privately-held
company specializing in pharmaceutical research, development, manufacturing,
licensing, acquisition and marketing of specialty generic pharmaceuticals.
Novel's business strategy is to focus on its core strength in identifying and
timely executing niche business opportunities in the generic pharmaceutical
area. Elite owns approximately 10% of the outstanding shares of Class A Voting
Common Stock of Novel. To date, Elite has received no distributions
or dividends from this investment.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s
discussion addresses our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates
its estimates and judgment, including those related to bad debts, intangible
assets, income taxes, workers compensation, and contingencies and litigation.
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on
various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Management
believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its
Consolidated Financial Statements. Our most critical accounting policies include
the recognition of revenue upon completion of certain phases of projects under
research and development contracts. We also assess a need for an allowance to
reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we believe is more likely than
not to be realized. We assess the recoverability of long-lived assets and
intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. We assess our exposure to
current commitments and contingencies. It should be noted that actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Results
of Consolidated Operations
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30,
2009
Our
revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $994,646, an
increase of $218,430 or approximately 28% over revenues for the comparable
period of the prior year, and consisted of $767,341 in manufacturing fees,
$57,404 in lab fees and $169,901 in royalty fees. Revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, consisted of $538,941 in manufacturing fees and
$237,275 in royalty fees. Manufacturing fees increased by
approximately 42% due to timing of orders and shipments and growing demand for
the Lodrane products. Royalty revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
decreased by $67,374, when compared to royalty revenues for the same quarter of
the prior year. This decrease is due to a timing difference in the
prior year and is not an indicator of decreased overall Lodrane market
sales.
Research
and development costs for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were
$150,436, a decrease of $108,890 or approximately 42% from $259,326 of such
costs for the comparable period of the prior year. Decreases were
attributed to decreases in employee costs and consulting fees associated with
the development of products and lower active pharmaceutical ingredient costs for
product development.
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010, were
$379,104, a decrease of $12,996, or approximately 3% from $392,100 of general
and administrative expenses for the comparable period of the prior
year. The decrease was primarily due to continued cost reduction
initiatives throughout all aspects of our operations, offset by increased rent
expense related to the operating lease entered into as of July 1,
2010.
Depreciation
and amortization for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $25,960, a
decrease of $23,540, or approximately 48%, from $49,230 for the comparable
period of the prior year. The decrease was due to the implementation of improved
manufacturing cost accounting systems which more accurately allocate
depreciation expense among manufacturing and other operations, as well as
non-essential machinery and equipment not being replaced upon reaching
retirement, full depreciation.
Non-cash
compensation through the issuance of stock options and warrants for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 was $10,329, a decrease of $18,861, or
approximately 65% from $29,190 for the comparable period of the prior
year. The decrease was due to the timing of the amortization schedule
established at the time of issuance of the related stock options and
warrants.
5
Other
income/(expenses) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $2,002,071,
an increase in other income of $5,266,684 from the net other income/(expense) of
$(3,264,613) for the comparable period of the prior year. The
increase in other income/(expenses) was due to derivative income relating to
changes in the fair value of our preferred shares and outstanding warrants
during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 totaling $2.4 million, as compared
to a derivative expense of $2.9 million for the comparable period of the prior
year.
As
a result of the foregoing, our net income for the three months ended September
30, 2010 was $1,864,224 compared to a net loss of $(3,672,312) for the three
months ended September 30, 2009.
Six
Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended September 30,
2009
Our
revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2010 were $1,826,566, an
increase of $236,475 or approximately 15% over revenues for the comparable
period of the prior year, and consisted of $1,334,410 in manufacturing fees,
$141,221 in lab fees and $350,935 in royalty fees. Revenues for the six months
ended September 30, 2009, consisted of $1,204,005 in manufacturing fees and
$386,086 in royalty fees. Manufacturing fees increased by
approximately 11% due to growing demand for the Lodrane products. Royalty
revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 decreased by $35,151, when
compared to royalty revenues for the same period of the prior
year. This decrease is due to a timing difference in the prior year
and is not an indicator of decreased overall Lodrane market sales.
Research
and development costs for the six months ended September 30, 2010 were $315,444,
a decrease of $194,974 or approximately 38% from $510,418 of such costs for the
comparable period of the prior year. Decreases were attributed to
decreases in employee costs and consulting fees associated with the development
of products and lower active pharmaceutical ingredient costs for product
development.
General
and administrative expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2010, were
$635,345, a decrease of $153,292, or approximately 20% from $788,637 of general
and administrative expenses for the comparable period of the prior
year. The decrease was primarily due to continued cost reduction
initiatives throughout all aspects of our operations.
Depreciation
and amortization for the six months ended September 30, 2010 was $104,291, a
decrease of $70,481, or approximately 40%, from $174,772 for the comparable
period of the prior year. The decrease was due to the implementation of improved
manufacturing cost accounting systems which more accurately allocate
depreciation expense among manufacturing and other operations, as well as
non-essential machinery and equipment not being replaced upon reaching
retirement, full depreciation.
Non-cash
compensation through the issuance of stock options and warrants for the six
months ended September 30, 2010 was $25,687, a decrease of $58,866, or
approximately 70% from $84,553 for the comparable period of the prior
year. The decrease was due to the timing of the amortization schedule
established at the time of issuance of the related stock options and
warrants.
Other
income/(expenses) for the six months ended September 30, 2010 were $(2,670,555),
a decrease in other income of $1,434,094 from the net other income/(expense) of
$(1,236,461) for the comparable period of the prior year. The
decrease in other income/(expenses) was due to derivative expense related to
changes in the fair value of our preferred shares and outstanding warrants
during the six months ended September 30, 2010 totaling $1.8 million, as
compared to $0.2 million for the comparable period of the prior
year.
As a
result of the foregoing, our net loss for the six months ended September 30,
2010 was $(2,905,171) compared to a net loss of $(2,520,819) for the six months
ended September 30, 2009.
Material
Changes in Financial Condition
Our
working capital (total current assets less total current liabilities), decreased
to a deficit of $2.6 million as of September 30, 2010 from a working capital
deficit of $2.3 million as of March 31, 2010, primarily due to our net loss from
operations, exclusive of non-cash charges. In addition, it should be
noted that current liabilities includes the entire principal amount due on the
Company’s NJ-EDA Bonds Payable. This amount, totaling $3.4 million
has been classified as a current liability as a result of the Company receiving
a notice of default from the Trustee of the NJ-EDA Bonds. Please
refer to Note 5 to our financial statements and Item 3 of this current report on
Form 10-Q for further details.
6
We
achieved a positive cash flow from operations of $354,788 for the six months
ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to deferred revenues relating to
milestone payments, totaling $200,000, received from marketing contracts signed
during the period and our net income/(loss) from continuing operations
of $(2,905,171), increased by non cash charges totaling
$2,822,360, which included depreciation and amortization of
$241,626, change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities of
$(2,723,747), change in fair value of preferred share derivative liabilities of
$4,569,005, derivative interest payments satisfied through the issuance of
common shares in lieu of cash of $670,360, and non cash compensation satisfied
by the issuance of common stock and options of $25,687.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Going
concern considerations
As of
September 30, 2010, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2.6 million,
losses from operations totaling $0.2 million for the six months ended September
30, 2010, other expenses totaling $2.7 million for the six months ended and a
net loss of $2.9 million for the six months ended September 30,
2010.
In
addition, the Company has received Notice of Default from the Trustee of the
NJED Bonds as a result of the utilization of the debt service reserve being used
to pay interest payments due on September 1, 2009, March 1, 2010 and September
1, 2010 totaling $121k, $113k and $113k, respectively, and principal payments
due on September 1, 2009 totaling $210k. The debt service reserve was
utilized to make such payments as a result of the Company’s not having
sufficient funds available to make such payments when due.
The
Company did not have sufficient funds available to make the principal payments
due on September 1, 2010, totaling $200k and requested that the Trustee withdraw
such funds from the debt service reserve. The Company’s request was
denied and accordingly the principal payment due on September 1, 2010, totaling
$200k was not made.
The
Company has requested a postponement of principal payments due on September 1,
2010, 2011 and 2012, with an aggregate of all such postponed principal payments
being added to the principal payments due on September 1,
2013. Resolution of the Company’s default on the NJEDA Bonds and our
request for postponement of principal payments will have a significant effect on
our ability to operate in the future.
Please
refer to Note 5 to our financial statements and Item 3 of this current report on
Form 10-Q for a more detailed discussion of the NJEDA Bonds and Notice of
Default.
As of
September 30, 2010, we had cash reserves of $593,853. The completion
of all transactions contemplated by the Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement,
including the consummation of the third closing thereof, is expected to provide
additional funds to permit us to continue development of our product pipeline
for more than two years. Beyond two years, we anticipate that, with
growth of Lodrane and the launch of the generic Hydromorphone 8mg and Naltrexone
50mg recently acquired pursuant to asset purchase agreements with Mikah Pharma
LLC, Elite could be profitable. In addition, the
commercialization of the products developed at the Facility under the Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement is expected to add a new revenue source for Elite.
However, there can be no assurances as to the growth, success of development or
commercialization of these products.
Despite
the successful completion of the initial and second closings of the Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement, there can be no assurances that we will be able to
consummate the third closing pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Epic
Strategic Alliance Agreement. If such transactions are consummated,
we will receive additional cash proceeds of $1.6875 million (which will include
quarterly payments of $62,500 for a period of 11 quarters). Even if
we were able to successfully complete the third closing of the Epic Strategic
Alliance Agreement, we still may be required to seek additional capital in the
future and there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain such
additional capital on favorable terms, if at all. For additional information
regarding the Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement, please see our disclosures
under “Epic Strategic Alliance Agreement” in Item 7 of Part II of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and in our Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC
on March 23, 2009, May 6, 2009, June 5, 2009 and July 1, 2010, which disclosures
are incorporated herein by reference.
Based
upon our current cash position, management has undertaken a review of our
operations and implemented cost-cutting measures in an effort to eliminate any
expenses which are not deemed critical to our current strategic
objectives. We will continue this process without impeding our
ability to proceed with our critical strategic goals, which, as noted above,
include developing our pain management and other products and manufacturing our
current products.
7
For the
six months ended September 30, 2010, we realized approximately $0.4 million
positive cash flow from operating activities. Our working capital
deficit at September 30, 2010 was approximately $2.6 million compared with
working capital surplus of approximately $0.4 million at September 30,
2009. Please note that the working capital deficit of $2.6 million as
of September 30, 2010, includes the entire principal amount due in relation to
the NJEDA Bonds. This amount, totaling $3.4 million was first
classified as a current liability as of March 31, 2010, due to the Notice of
Default received from the Trustee in relation to the NJEDA Bonds. The
working capital surplus of $0.4 million as of September 30, 2009, does not
include classification of such entire principal amount due on the NJEDA Bonds as
a current liability. Please refer to Note 5 to our financial
statements and Item 3 of this current report on Form 10-Q for a more detailed
discussion of the NJEDA Bonds and Notice of Default.
Cash and
cash equivalents at September 30, 2010, were approximately $0.6 million, an
increase of approximately $0.4 million from the approximately $0.2 million at
September 30, 2009.
As of
September 30, 2010, our principal source of liquidity was approximately $0.6 of
cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, we may have access to
funds through the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants. There can
be no assurance that the exercise of outstanding warrants or options will
generate or provide sufficient cash.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have
not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably
likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity,
capital expenditures, or capital resources that would be considered material to
investors.
Effects
of Inflation
We are
subject to price risks arising from price fluctuations in the market prices of
the products that we sell. Management does not believe that inflation
risk is material to our business or our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, or cash flows.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable
ITEM
4 CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officers, we evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive and Chief
Financial Officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by this report were not effective so that that the
information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange
Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to
our management in order to allow for timely decisions regarding
disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance,
however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
Management
has determined that, as of September 30, 2010, there were material weaknesses in
both the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely
basis.
8
The
deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure
controls and procedures are related to the lack of segregation of duties due to
the size of our accounting department, which replaced an outside accounting firm
and non-employee Chief Financial Officer on July 1, 2009, and limited enterprise
resource planning systems. When our financial position improves, we
intend to hire additional personnel and implement enterprise resource planning
systems required to remedy such deficiencies.
Changes
in Internal Controls
There have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15 (f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter September June 30,
2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
In the
ordinary course of business we may be subject to litigation from time to time.
Except as follows, there is no past, pending or, to our knowledge, threatened
litigation or administrative action to which we are a party or of which our
property is the subject (including litigation or actions involving our officers,
directors, affiliates, or other key personnel, or holders of record or
beneficially of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any
associate of any such party) which in our opinion has, or is expected to have, a
material adverse effect upon our business, prospects, financial condition or
operations.
The PharmaNetwork, LLC v. Elite
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. – On or about September 3, 2010, The PharmaNetwork,
LLC (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court
of New Jersey Chancery Division: Bergen County (Docket No. C-272-10), with an
amendment of this complaint being filed on or about September 24, 2010 (the “TPN
Complaint”). The TPN Complaint consists of two counts. The first
count is for breach of contract and specific performance & injunctive relief
and seeks judgment against the Company for (a) specific performance of the
Product Collaboration Agreement made on or about November 26, 2006 (the
“Agreement”) ; (b) injunctive relief enjoining the Company from using its assets
for any purpose other than its obligations under the Agreement and the payment
of the Company’s existing and continuing costs and expenses incurred in the
ordinary course of business ; and (c) such other relief as the Court deems
equitable and just. The second count is for breach of the implied
covenant of good faith and fair dealing and seeks judgment against the Company
for (a) specific performance of the Product Collaboration Agreement made on or
about November 26, 2006 (the “Agreement”) ; (b) injunctive relief enjoining the
Company from using its assets for any purpose other than its obligations under
the Agreement and the payment of the Company’s existing and continuing costs and
expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business ; and (c) such other relief
as the Court deems equitable and just.
Plaintiffs
requests for injunctive relief have been denied pursuant to order of the
court.
The
Company disputes the claims, believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends
to vigorously defend against them.
On or
about October 14, 2010, the Company filed its response to the TPN complaint and
two counterclaims. The first counterclaim asserts TPN’s breach of
contract and seeks monetary damages in the sum of an amount no less than $1.125
million, plus interest. The second counterclaim asserts TPN’s breach
of its obligation of good faith and fair dealing to the Company and seeks
monetary damages in the sum of an amount no less than $1.125 million, plus
interest.
The case
is presently in discovery stage.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
have been no material changes from the Risk Factors described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we issued 5,303,764 shares of our common
stock to the holders of our Series B, C and D Preferred Stock. The
shares were issued in satisfaction of our obligation to pay $306,440 in
dividends earned and/or accrued during the quarter ended June 30,
2010. We did not receive any proceeds in exchange for the issuance of
these securities. We relied on the exemption provided by Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933 to issue the common stock. The securities were
offered and sold without any form of general solicitation or general advertising
and the offerees made representations that they were accredited
investors.
9
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Please
see the discussion in Note 5 to our financial statements titled “NJEDA Bonds”
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM
4. REMOVED
AND RESERVED
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
10
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
exhibits listed in the index below are filed as part of this
report.
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1(a)
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company, together with all other amendments
thereto, as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware,
incorporated by reference to (a) Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333-101686), filed with the SEC on December 6, 2002
(the “Form S-4”), (b) Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K dated July 28, 2004 and filed with the SEC on July 29, 2004, (c)
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 26,
2008 and filed with the SEC on July 2, 2008, and (d) Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2008 and filed
with the SEC on December 23, 2008.
|
|
3.1(b)
|
Certificate
of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock, as
filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October
6, 2004, and filed with the SEC on October 12, 2004.
|
|
3.1(c)
|
Certificate
of Retirement with the Secretary of the State of the Delaware to retire
516,558 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, as filed with the
Secretary of State of Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2006, and filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2006.
|
|
|
||
3.1(d)
|
Certificate
of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B 8% Convertible
Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated March 15, 2006, and filed with the SEC on March 16,
2006.
|
|
3.1(e)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of
Series B 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 24, 2007, and filed with the
SEC on April 25, 2007.
|
|
3.1(f)
|
Certificate
of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C 8% Convertible
Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
dated April 24, 2007, and filed with the SEC on April 25,
2007.
|
|
3.1(g)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C 8%
Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of the State of
Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated April 24, 2007, and filed with the SEC on April 25,
2007
|
|
3.1(h)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of
Series B 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2008, and filed with
the SEC on September 16, 2008.
|
|
3.1(i)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C 8%
Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of the State of
Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2008, and filed with the SEC on September
16, 2008.
|
|
3.1(j)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of
Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3
to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2008, and filed with
the SEC on September 16, 2008.
|
|
3.1(k)
|
Certificate
of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series E
Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 1, 2009, and filed with the SEC on June 5,
2009.
|
11
3.1(l)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations of the Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock
as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 29,
2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated July 1, 2010 and filed with the SEC on July 1,
2010
|
|
3.1(m)
|
Amended
Certificate of Designations of the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock as
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 29,
2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated July 1, 2010 and filed with the SEC on July1,
2010
|
|
3.2
|
By-Laws
of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No. 333-90633)
made effective on February 28, 2000 (the “Form SB-2”).
|
|
4.1
|
Form
of specimen certificate for Common Stock of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form SB-2.
|
|
4.2
|
Form
of specimen certificate for Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated October 6, 2004, and filed with the SEC on October 12,
2004.
|
|
4.3
|
Form
of specimen certificate for Series B 8% Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated March 15, 2006 and filed with the SEC on March 16,
2006.
|
|
4.4
|
Form
of specimen certificate for Series C 8% Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated April 24, 2007 and filed with the SEC on April 25,
2007.
|
|
4.5
|
Warrant
to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock issued to DH Blair Investment
Banking Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004.
|
|
4.6
|
Warrant
to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock issued to Jason Lyons
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
4.7
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to designees of
lender with respect to financing of an equipment loan incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
4.8
|
Form
of Short Term Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to
purchasers in the private placement which initially closed on October 6,
2004 (the “Series A Financing”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 6, 2004, and filed with
the SEC on October 12, 2004
|
|
4.9
|
Form
of Long Term Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to
purchasers in the Series A Financing, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 6, 2004, and filed
with the SEC on October 12, 2004.
|
|
4.10
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to the Placement
Agent, in connection with the Series A Financing, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October
6, 2004, and filed with the SEC on October 12, 2004.
|
|
4.11
|
Form
of Replacement Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock in connection
with the offer to holders of Warrants in the Series A Financing (the
“Warrant Exchange”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 14, 2005, and filed with the
SEC on December 20, 2005.
|
|
4.12
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock to the Placement Agent, in
connection with the Warrant Exchange, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 14, 2005, and filed
with the SEC on December 20,
2005.
|
12
4.13
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to purchasers in the
private placement which closed on March 15, 2006 (the “Series B
Financing”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated March 15, 2006 and filed with the SEC on March
16, 2006.
|
|
4.14
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to purchasers in the
Series B Financing, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 15, 2006 and filed with the SEC on
March 16, 2006.
|
|
4.15
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to the Placement
Agent, in connection with the Series B Financing, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March
15, 2006 and filed with the SEC on March 16, 2006.
|
|
4.16
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase 600,000 shares of Common Stock issued to Indigo
Ventures, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated July 12, 2006 and filed with the SEC on July 18,
2006.
|
|
4.17
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase up to 478,698 shares of Common Stock issued to
VGS PHARMA, LLC, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3(a) to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 6, 2006 and
filed with the SEC on December 12, 2006.
|
|
4.18
|
Form
of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 1,750,000 shares of Common
Stock granted to Veerappan Subramanian, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3(b) to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 6, 2006 and
filed with the SEC on December 12, 2006.
|
|
4.19
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to purchasers in the
private placement which closed on April 24, 2007 (the “Series C
Financing”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated April 24, 2007 and filed with the SEC on April
25, 2007.
|
|
4.20
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to the placement
agent in the Series C Financing, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 24, 2007 and filed with the
SEC on April 25, 2007.
|
|
4.21
|
Form
of specimen certificate for Series D 8% Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated September 15, 2008 and filed with the SEC on September 16,
2008.
|
|
4.22
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to purchasers in the
private placement which closed on September 15, 2008 (the “Series D
Financing”), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K, dated September 15, 2008 and filed with the SEC on
September 16, 2008.
|
|
4.23
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to the placement
agent in the Series D Financing, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 15, 2008 and filed with
the SEC on September 16, 2008.
|
|
4.24
|
Form
of specimen certificate for Series E Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 1, 2009, and filed with the SEC on June 5,
2009.
|
|
4.25
|
Warrant
to purchase shares of Common Stock issued to Epic Investments, LLC in the
initial closing of the Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated as of March 18,
2009, by and among the Company, Epic Pharma, LLC and Epic Investments,
LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 1, 2009, and filed with the SEC on June 5,
2009.
|
|
10.1
|
Stipulation
of Settlement and Release, dated as of June 25, 2010, by and among the
Company, Midsummer Investment, Ltd., Bushido Capital Master Fund, LP, BCMF
Trustees, LLC, Epic Pharma, LLC and Epic Investments, LLC, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 1,
2010 and filed with the SEC on July 1, 2010
|
|
10.2
|
Amendment
Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2010, by and among the Company, and the
investors signatory thereto, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July
1, 2010 and filed with the SEC on July 1,
2010
|
13
10.3
|
Amendment
Agreement, dated as of June 2010, by and among the Company, Epic Pharma,
LLC and Epic Investments, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 1, 2010 and filed with the
SEC on July 1, 2010
|
|
10.4
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated as of May 18, 2010, by and among Mikah Pharma LLC
and the Company
|
|
10.5
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2010, by and among Mikah Pharma
LLC and the Company. Confidential portions of this exhibit have been
redacted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a
confidential treatment request in accordance with Rule 24b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A description of
this Asset Purchase Agreement is incorporated by reference to Item 2.01 of
the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 27, 2010 and filed with SEC
on September 1, 2010
|
|
10.6
|
Master
Development and License Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2010, by and
among Mikah Pharma LLC and the Company. Confidential portions
of this exhibit have been redacted and filed separately with the
Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request in accordance with
Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. A description of this Asset Purchase Agreement is
incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated August 27, 2010 and filed with SEC on September 1,
2010
|
|
10.7
|
Purchase
Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2010, by and among Epic Pharma LLC
and the Company. Confidential portions of this exhibit have
been redacted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a
confidential treatment request in accordance with Rule 24b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A description of
this Asset Purchase Agreement is incorporated by reference to Item 2.01 of
the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 10, 2010 and filed with
SEC on September 16, 2010
|
|
10.8
|
License
Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2010, by and among Precision Dose
Inc. and the Company. Confidential portions of this exhibit
have been redacted and filed separately with the Commission pursuant to a
confidential treatment request in accordance with Rule 24b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A description of
this Asset Purchase Agreement is incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of
the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 10, 2010 and filed with
SEC on September 16, 2010
|
|
10.9
|
Manufacturing
and Supply Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2010, by and among
Precision Dose Inc. and the Company. Confidential portions of
this exhibit have been redacted and filed separately with the Commission
pursuant to a confidential treatment request in accordance with Rule 24b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
description of this Asset Purchase Agreement is incorporated by reference
to Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 10, 2010
and filed with SEC on September 16, 2010
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
ELITE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
||
Date:
November
15,
2010
|
/s/ Jerry Treppel
|
|
Jerry
Treppel
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Date: November
15,
2010
|
/s/ Carter J. Ward
|
|
Carter
J. Ward
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
15