EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended June 30,
2009
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission
File Number: 000-18464
EMCLAIRE
FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
|
25-1606091
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
612
Main Street, Emlenton, Pennsylvania
|
16373
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(724)
867-2311
(Registrant’s
telephone number)
____________________________________________________________________________
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer or a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
Yes o No
x
The
number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock was 1,431,404 at
August 14, 2009.
EMCLAIRE
FINANCIAL CORP.
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
PART I – FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Interim
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
1
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
4
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|||
|
||||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
25
|
||
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
26
|
||
PART II – OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
26
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
26
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
27
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
27
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
27
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
27
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
27
|
||
Signatures
|
28
|
PART I - FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Interim Financial
Statements
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except share data)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 2,367 | $ | 4,292 | ||||
Interest
earning deposits with banks
|
17,919 | 12,279 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
20,286 | 16,571 | ||||||
Securities
available for sale, at fair value
|
77,241 | 71,443 | ||||||
Loans
receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,935 and
$2,651
|
268,293 | 264,838 | ||||||
Federal
bank stocks, at cost
|
4,125 | 3,797 | ||||||
Bank-owned
life insurance
|
5,286 | 5,186 | ||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
1,429 | 1,519 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
9,353 | 8,609 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
1,422 | 1,422 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
3,179 | 2,279 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 390,614 | $ | 375,664 | ||||
Liabilities and
Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Non-interest
bearing
|
$ | 54,128 | $ | 56,351 | ||||
Interest
bearing
|
237,772 | 230,296 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
291,900 | 286,647 | ||||||
Short-term
borrowed funds
|
24,600 | 13,188 | ||||||
Long-term
borrowed funds
|
35,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
652 | 761 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
2,790 | 3,945 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
354,942 | 339,541 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; 7,500 issued and
outstanding
|
7,421 | 7,412 | ||||||
Warrants
|
88 | 88 | ||||||
Common
stock, $1.25 par value, 12,000,000 shares authorized; 1,559,421 shares
issued; 1,431,404 shares outstanding
|
1,949 | 1,949 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
14,619 | 14,564 | ||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost; 128,017 shares
|
(2,653 | ) | (2,653 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
16,101 | 15,840 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,853 | ) | (1,077 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
35,672 | 36,123 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 390,614 | $ | 375,664 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Unaudited)
For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except per share data)
For
the three months
|
For
the six months
|
|||||||||||||||
ended
June 30,
|
ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Loans
receivable, including fees
|
$ | 4,126 | $ | 3,929 | $ | 8,362 | $ | 7,858 | ||||||||
Securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Taxable
|
383 | 412 | 911 | 789 | ||||||||||||
Exempt
from federal income tax
|
190 | 161 | 343 | 323 | ||||||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
3 | 25 | 8 | 55 | ||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
87 | 36 | 176 | 59 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest and dividend income
|
4,789 | 4,563 | 9,800 | 9,084 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
1,421 | 1,554 | 2,961 | 3,126 | ||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
389 | 445 | 799 | 851 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
1,810 | 1,999 | 3,760 | 3,977 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
2,979 | 2,564 | 6,040 | 5,107 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
540 | 85 | 837 | 145 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,439 | 2,479 | 5,203 | 4,962 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fees
and service charges
|
382 | 407 | 721 | 765 | ||||||||||||
Commissions
on financial services
|
169 | 127 | 252 | 245 | ||||||||||||
Net
gain (loss) on available for sale securities
|
184 | (275 | ) | 240 | (275 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
gain (loss) on sales of loans
|
- | (6 | ) | 4 | 8 | |||||||||||
Earnings
on bank-owned life insurance
|
57 | 57 | 114 | 113 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
127 | 186 | 308 | 301 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
919 | 496 | 1,639 | 1,157 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Noninterest
expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Compensation
and employee benefits
|
1,438 | 1,283 | 2,875 | 2,700 | ||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment
|
443 | 418 | 925 | 839 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
1,015 | 592 | 1,718 | 1,169 | ||||||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
2,896 | 2,293 | 5,518 | 4,708 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
462 | 682 | 1,324 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
54 | 141 | 248 | 311 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
408 | 541 | 1,076 | 1,100 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated
preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
|
98 | - | 196 | - | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ | 310 | $ | 541 | $ | 880 | $ | 1,100 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.87 | ||||||||
Average
common shares outstanding
|
1,431,404 | 1,267,835 | 1,431,404 | 1,267,835 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Dilutive
shares
|
- | - | - | - |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
For
the six months
|
||||||||
ended
June 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,076 | $ | 1,100 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization of premises and equipment
|
400 | 342 | ||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
837 | 145 | ||||||
Amortization
of premiums and (accretion of discounts), net
|
(70 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||
Amortization
of intangible assets and mortgage servicing rights
|
8 | 5 | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred loan costs
|
136 | 156 | ||||||
Realized
(gain) loss on available for sale securities, net
|
(240 | ) | 275 | |||||
Net
gains on sales of loans
|
(4 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Originations
of loans sold
|
(159 | ) | (1,263 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from the sale of loans
|
163 | 1,261 | ||||||
Restricted
stock and stock option compensation
|
56 | 52 | ||||||
Earnings
on bank-owned life insurance, net
|
(100 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in accrued interest receivable
|
90 | 74 | ||||||
Decrease
(increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(500 | ) | 22 | |||||
Decrease
in accrued interest payable
|
(109 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(1,155 | ) | (297 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
429 | 1,663 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Loan
originations and principal collections, net
|
(4,519 | ) | (12,331 | ) | ||||
Available
for sale securities:
|
||||||||
Sales
|
8,137 | - | ||||||
Maturities,
repayments and calls
|
26,840 | 45,440 | ||||||
Purchases
|
(41,635 | ) | (55,708 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of federal bank stocks
|
(328 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from the sale of foreclosed real estate
|
77 | - | ||||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(1,144 | ) | (454 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(12,572 | ) | (23,240 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Net
increase in deposits
|
5,253 | 14,771 | ||||||
Net
increase in short-term borrowed funds
|
11,412 | 8,251 | ||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(807 | ) | (811 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
15,858 | 22,211 | ||||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
3,715 | 634 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
16,571 | 10,483 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 20,286 | $ | 11,117 | ||||
Supplemental
information:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | 3,869 | $ | 3,995 | ||||
Income
taxes paid
|
183 | 180 | ||||||
Supplemental
noncash disclosure:
|
||||||||
Transfers
from loans to foreclosed real estate
|
76 | 44 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except per share data)
For
the three months
|
For
the six months
|
|||||||||||||||
ended
June 30,
|
ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$ | 36,173 | $ | 25,086 | $ | 36,123 | $ | 24,703 | ||||||||
Net
income
|
408 | 541 | 1,076 | 1,100 | ||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
||||||||||||||||
Change
in net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities, net of
taxes
|
(526 | ) | (429 | ) | (618 | ) | (221 | ) | ||||||||
Less
reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income, net
of taxes
|
(121 | ) | 182 | (158 | ) | 182 | ||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
(647 | ) | (247 | ) | (776 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||
Total
comprehensive income (loss)
|
(239 | ) | 294 | 300 | 1,061 | |||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
32 | 31 | 56 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on preferred stock
|
(94 | ) | - | (148 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
(200 | ) | (406 | ) | (659 | ) | (811 | ) | ||||||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$ | 35,672 | $ | 25,005 | $ | 35,672 | $ | 25,005 | ||||||||
Common
cash dividend per share
|
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.64 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Emclaire
Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.
|
Nature
of Operations and Basis of
Presentation.
|
Emclaire
Financial Corp. (the “Corporation”) is a Pennsylvania company organized as the
holding company of Farmers National Bank of Emlenton (the “Bank”) and Emclaire
Settlement Services, LLC (the “Title Company”). The Corporation provides a
variety of financial services to individuals and businesses through its offices
in western Pennsylvania. Its primary deposit products are checking, savings and
certificate of deposit accounts and its primary lending products are residential
and commercial mortgages, commercial business and consumer loans.
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and the Title Company. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in preparing the
consolidated financial statements.
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the interim periods
include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are
necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect the Corporation’s
consolidated financial position and results of operations. Additionally, these
consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been prepared in
accordance with instructions for the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
(SEC’s) Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and therefore do not include
all information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). For
further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, as contained in the
Corporation’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial instruments, goodwill,
the valuation of deferred tax assets and other than temporary impairment
charges. The results of operations for interim quarterly or year to date periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
entire year or any other period. Certain amounts previously reported may have
been reclassified to conform to the current year’s financial statement
presentation.
The
Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the
balance sheet date of June 30, 2009 for items that should potentially be
recognized or disclosed in these financial statements. The evaluation was
conducted through August 14, 2009, the date these financial statements were
issued.
2.
|
Earnings
per Common Share.
|
Basic
earnings per common share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing
net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common
stock that then shared in the earnings of the Corporation. Options and
restricted stock awards of 89,500 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase 50,111 shares of common stock were not included in computing diluted
earnings per share because their cumulative effects were not dilutive for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
5
3.
|
Branch
Purchase.
|
On April
6, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement with
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) and National City Bank (National City)
to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of National City’s
full-service branch office located in Titusville, Pennsylvania. As part of the
agreement, the Bank will assume approximately $90 million in deposits in
exchange for approximately $35 million in loans, cash, and certain fixed assets
of the branch office. The Bank has agreed to pay a premium of 3.4% of deposits
assumed based on the average balance of deposits during a pre-determined period
leading up to the transaction closing date. The proposed branch office
acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of
applicable regulatory approvals. The Corporation intends to consummate the
transaction during the third quarter of 2009. The transaction is expected to be
accretive to the Corporation’s earnings in the fourth quarter of
2009.
4.
|
Securities.
|
The
Corporation’s securities as of the respective dates are summarized as
follows:
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
cost
|
gains
|
losses
|
value
|
||||||||||||
Available for
sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury securities
|
$ | 2,973 | $ | 18 | $ | - | $ | 2,991 | ||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and related entities
|
19,454 | 96 | (63 | ) | 19,487 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
32,991 | 628 | (51 | ) | 33,568 | |||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
18,866 | 175 | (316 | ) | 18,725 | |||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
3,901 | - | (1,431 | ) | 2,470 | |||||||||||
$ | 78,185 | $ | 917 | $ | (1,861 | ) | $ | 77,241 | ||||||||
December
31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury securities
|
$ | 19,985 | $ | 139 | $ | (47 | ) | $ | 20,077 | |||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and related entities
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
29,806 | 586 | (12 | ) | 30,380 | |||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
13,543 | 270 | (5 | ) | 13,808 | |||||||||||
Corporate
securities
|
3,984 | - | - | 3,984 | ||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
3,893 | - | (699 | ) | 3,194 | |||||||||||
$ | 71,211 | $ | 995 | $ | (763 | ) | $ | 71,443 |
The
following table summarizes scheduled maturities of the Corporation’s securities
as of June 30, 2009:
Available
for sale
|
||||||||
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
cost
|
value
|
||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 165 | $ | 167 | ||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
14,957 | 15,017 | ||||||
Due
after five through ten years
|
18,272 | 18,183 | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
40,890 | 41,404 | ||||||
No
scheduled maturity
|
3,901 | 2,470 | ||||||
$ | 78,185 | $ | 77,241 |
Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the
right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
6
Information
pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous loss position,
follows:
4.
|
Securities
(continued).
|
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
||||||||||||||||||
Description
of Securities
|
Value
|
Loss
|
Value
|
Loss
|
Value
|
Loss
|
||||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and related entities
|
$ | 3,931 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 3,931 | $ | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
4,698 | (20 | ) | 4,198 | (31 | ) | 8,896 | (51 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
10,009 | (316 | ) | - | - | 10,009 | (316 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate
securities
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
- | - | 2,246 | (1,431 | ) | 2,246 | (1,431 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 18,638 | $ | (399 | ) | $ | 6,444 | $ | (1,462 | ) | $ | 25,082 | $ | (1,861 | ) | ||||||||||
December
31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies and related entities
|
$ | 6,452 | $ | (47 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 6,452 | $ | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
9,185 | (12 | ) | - | - | 9,185 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
2,352 | (5 | ) | - | - | 2,352 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate
securities
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity
securities
|
- | - | 3,128 | (699 | ) | 3,128 | (699 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 17,989 | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 3,128 | $ | (699 | ) | $ | 21,117 | $ | (763 | ) |
Management
evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic, market or other concerns warrant such
evaluation. Consideration is given to: (1) the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the
Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
As of
June 30, 2009, there were 35 debt and 7 equity securities in an unrealized loss
position. These unrealized losses are considered to be temporary
impairments. A decline in the value of the debt securities is due only to
interest rate fluctuations, rather than erosion of quality. As a result, the
payment of contractual cash flows, including principal repayment, is not at
risk. As management has the intent and ability to hold these investments until
market recovery or maturity, none of the unrealized losses on debt securities
are deemed to be other than temporary.
Equity
securities owned by the Corporation consist of common stock of various financial
service providers that have traditionally been high-performing stocks. However,
as a result of recent market volatility in financial stocks, the fair values of
most of the stocks held were “under water” as of June 30, 2009, and as such,
could have been considered impaired. The Corporation does not invest in these
securities with the intent to sell them for a profit in the near-term.
Management believes these securities will appreciate in value over the
long-term. In addition, stocks can be cyclical and will experience some down
periods. Historically, bank stocks have sustained cyclical losses followed by
periods of substantial gains. Based on these circumstances and the Corporation’s
intent to hold these securities and its belief it will not be required to sell
these securities before recovery occurs, the Corporation does not consider these
investments to be other than temporarily impaired at June 30, 2009.
7
5.
|
Loans
Receivable.
|
The Corporation’s loans receivable as
of the respective dates are summarized as follows:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Mortgage
loans on real estate:
|
||||||||
Residential
first mortgages
|
$ | 71,578 | $ | 74,130 | ||||
Home
equity loans and lines of credit
|
56,921 | 57,454 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
88,632 | 85,689 | ||||||
217,131 | 217,273 | |||||||
Other
loans:
|
||||||||
Commercial
business
|
43,565 | 40,787 | ||||||
Consumer
|
10,532 | 9,429 | ||||||
54,097 | 50,216 | |||||||
Total
loans, gross
|
271,228 | 267,489 | ||||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
2,935 | 2,651 | ||||||
Total
loans, net
|
$ | 268,293 | $ | 264,838 |
6.
|
Deposits.
|
The Corporation’s deposits as of the
respective dates are summarized as follows:
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
June
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||
Type
of accounts
|
Amount
|
%
|
Amount
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Non-interest
bearing deposits
|
$ | 54,128 | 18.6 | % | $ | 56,351 | 19.7 | % | ||||||||
Interest
bearing demand deposits
|
118,603 | 40.6 | % | 106,042 | 37.0 | % | ||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
119,169 | 40.8 | % | 124,254 | 43.3 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 291,900 | 100.0 | % | $ | 286,647 | 100.0 | % |
7.
|
Guarantees.
|
The
Corporation does not issue any guarantees that would require liability
recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Of these letters of
credit at June 30, 2009, $81,000 will expire within the next ten months,
$721,000 will automatically renew within the next twelve months and $241,000
will automatically renew within thirteen to nineteen months. The Corporation,
generally, holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these
commitments. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a
liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient
to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the
corresponding guarantees. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit
is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities
to customers. The current amount of the liability as of June 30, 2009 for
guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.
8
8.
|
Employee Benefit
Plans.
|
The
Corporation maintains a defined contribution 401(k) Plan. Eligible employees
participate by providing tax-deferred contributions up to 20% of qualified
compensation. Employee contributions are vested at all times. The Corporation
provides a matching contribution of up to 4% of the participant’s salary.
Matching contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted
to $73,000 and $76,000, respectively.
The
Corporation provides pension benefits for eligible employees through a defined
benefit pension plan. Substantially all full-time employees participate in
the retirement plan on a non-contributing basis and are fully vested after five
years of service.
The
Corporation uses December 31 as the measurement date for its plans.
The
components of the periodic pension cost are as follows:
For
the three months ended
|
For
the six months ended
|
Year
ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 62 | $ | 63 | $ | 124 | $ | 126 | $ | 233 | ||||||||||
Interest
cost
|
75 | 71 | 150 | 142 | 285 | |||||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(66 | ) | (79 | ) | (132 | ) | (158 | ) | (305 | ) | ||||||||||
Prior
service costs
|
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Recognized
net actuarial loss
|
27 | 4 | 54 | 8 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
$ | 90 | $ | 51 | $ | 180 | $ | 102 | $ | 201 |
The
expected rate of return on plan assets was 7.75% for the periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008. The Corporation previously disclosed in its financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2008 that it expected to contribute $350,000 to
its pension plan in 2009. As of June 30, 2009, $350,000 has been
contributed.
9.
|
Stock
Compensation Plans.
|
In May
2007, the Corporation adopted the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and Trust. Under the
Plan, the Corporation may grant options to its directors, officers and employees
for up to 177,496 shares of common stock. Incentive stock options, non-incentive
or compensatory stock options and share awards may be granted under the Plan.
The exercise price of each option shall at least equal the market price of a
share of common stock on the date of grant and have a contractual term of ten
years. Options and restricted stock awards shall vest and become exercisable at
the rate, to the extent and subject to such limitations as may be specified by
the Corporation. The Corporation accounts for its stock compensation plans in
accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
123(R)), which requires
that compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions be recognized
in the financial statements with measurement based upon the fair value of the
equity or liability instruments issued. For the six-month periods ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $56,000 and $52,000, respectively, in
stock compensation expense.
9
9.
|
Stock
Compensation Plans (continued).
|
A summary
of option activity under the Plan as of June 30, 2009, and changes during the
period then ended is presented below:
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Term
(in
years)
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at the beginning of the year
|
94,000 | $ | 25.66 | 8.7 | ||||||||||||
Granted
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | - | |||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
4,500 | 26.00 | - | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of June 30, 2009
|
89,500 | $ | 25.64 | $ | - | 8.2 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
as of June 30, 2009
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | - |
A summary
of the status of the Corporation’s nonvested shares as of June 30, 2009, and
changes during the period then ended is presented below:
Options
|
Weighted-Average
Grant-date
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Nonvested
at the beginning of the year
|
94,000 | $ | 3.13 | |||||
Granted
|
- | - | ||||||
Vested
|
- | - | ||||||
Forfeited
|
4,500 | 3.39 | ||||||
Nonvested
as of June 30, 2009
|
89,500 | $ | 3.12 |
As of
June 30, 2009, there was $180,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over an average period of 1.2
years.
10.
|
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments.
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements.
SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are
as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted
prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for
identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted prices in
markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or
indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability.
Level 3: Prices or valuation
techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market
activity).
An asset
or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
10
10.
|
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
(continued).
|
For
assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements
by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
Description
|
Total
|
(Level
1)
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
|
(Level
2)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
(Level
3)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||||||
June
30, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale
|
$ | 77,241 | $ | 2,470 | $ | 74,770 | $ | - | ||||||||
December
31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities
available for sale
|
$ | 71,443 | $ | 3,194 | $ | 68,249 | $ | - |
For
assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value
measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy are as
follows:
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
Description
|
Total
|
(Level
1)
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
|
(Level
2)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
(Level
3)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
||||||||||||
June
30, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | 112 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 112 | ||||||||
Repossessions
|
484 | - | 484 | - | ||||||||||||
$ | 596 | $ | - | $ | 484 | $ | 112 | |||||||||
December
31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Repossessions
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
The
following valuation techniques were used to measure fair value of assets in the
tables above:
Available for sale securities
– Fair value on available for sale securities were based upon a market
approach. Prices for securities that are fixed income instruments that are not
quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets, are obtained through
third party data service providers or dealer market participants which the
Corporation has historically transacted both purchases and sales of investment
securities. As of June 30, 2009, all fair values on available for sale
securities were based on prices obtained from these sources and were based on
actual market quotations for each specific security.
Impaired loans – Fair value
on impaired loans is measured using the estimate fair market value of the
collateral less the estimate costs to sell. Fair value of the loan’s collateral
is typically determined by appraisals or independent valuation. Management’s
ongoing review of appraisal information may result in additional discounts or
adjustments to valuation based upon more recent market sales activity or more
current appraisal information derived from properties of similar type and/or
locale. As of June 30, 2009 the fair value consists of a loan balance of
$133,000, net of a valuation allowance of $21,000. Additional provision for loan
losses of $21,000 was recorded during the six months ended June 30,
2009.
11
10.
|
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
(continued).
|
Repossessions – Fair value on
repossessed assets is measured using the estimate fair market value of the asset
less the estimate costs to sell. Fair value of the asset is typically determined
by appraisals or independent valuation.
Effective
January 1, 2009, the Corporation adopted FSP 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 (FSP 157-2), which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years.
At June 30, 2009, the Corporation had no non-financial assets or liabilities
carried at fair value, measured on a recurring or non-recurring
basis.
Under
SFAS 107, the Corporation is required to disclose the estimated fair value of
its financial instrument assets and liabilities including those subject to the
requirements of SFAS 157. The estimated fair values and carrying values of all
financial statement instruments covered by SFAS 157 and SFAS 107 at June 30,
2009 were as follows:
June
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Carrying
amount
|
Fair
value
|
Carrying
amount
|
Fair
value
|
||||||||||||
Financial
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 20,286 | $ | 20,286 | $ | 16,571 | $ | 16,571 | ||||||||
Securities
|
77,241 | 77,241 | 71,443 | 71,443 | ||||||||||||
Loans
receivable, net
|
268,293 | 274,349 | 264,838 | 272,662 | ||||||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
4,125 | 4,125 | 3,797 | 3,797 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
1,429 | 1,429 | 1,519 | 1,519 | ||||||||||||
Financial
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
291,900 | 294,357 | 286,647 | 290,533 | ||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
59,600 | 59,597 | 48,188 | 52,510 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
652 | 652 | 761 | 761 |
This
information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the
entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited
portion of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of
valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the
estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other
companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used
to estimate fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008:
Carrying
amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, securities,
federal bank stocks, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits,
borrowed funds, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and
fully. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits
with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted
cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit
risk. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The
fair value of off-balance sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that
would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements and is not
material.
12
11.
|
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting
Standards.
|
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). This FSP amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under
SFAS 141(R) and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. This FSP did not affect the
Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In June
2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument
(or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (EITF 07-5).
EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate
whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed
to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and
settlement provisions. It also clarifies the impact of foreign currency
denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation
instruments on the evaluation. EITF 07-5 became effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. EITF 07-5 did not affect the Corporation’s
consolidated financial statements.
In
November 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-6, Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations (EITF 08-6). EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting for
certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method
investments. EITF 08-6 became effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. EITF 08-6 did not affect the Corporation’s consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB SFAS
107, Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting, to require
those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting
periods. This FSP is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. An entity early adopting FSP FAS 107-1
and APB 28-1 must also early adopt FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair
Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly (FSP
157-4), and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2).
The Corporation adopted
this pronouncement effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption
of this pronouncement did not affect the Corporation’s consolidated financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2. FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 clarifies
the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining
whether a debt security is other than temporarily impaired. For debt
securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the
security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the
security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before
assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the
investment. Previously, this assessment required management to assert it
has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time
sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid
recognizing an other than temporary impairment. This change does not affect
the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash
flows or market price.
13
11.
|
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
(continued).
|
In
instances when a determination is made that an other than temporary impairment
exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not
more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to
its anticipated recovery, FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the presentation and
amount of the other than temporary impairment recognized in the income
statement. The
other
than temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to
be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the
total other than temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount
of the total other than temporary impairment related to the credit loss is
recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other than temporary
impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive
income.
This FSP
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. An entity early adopting FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 must also early
adopt FSP 157-4, Determining
Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly. The Corporation adopted this pronouncement effective for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not
affect the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP 157-4. FASB SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurement (SFAS 157), defines
fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the
liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or
distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under
current market conditions. FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance on
determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has
significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on identifying
circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.
FSP 157-4
provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine
whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for
the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been
a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and
significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair
value in accordance with SFAS 157.
This FSP
clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and
level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be
orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the
evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The FSP provides
a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not
orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly
transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair
value.
This FSP
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. An entity early adopting FSP 157-4 must also early adopt FSP 115-2
and FAS 124-2. The Corporation adopted this standard effective for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not affect
the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
14
11.
|
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
(continued).
|
In May
2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events, (SFAS
165). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS 165 defines the
period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under
which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or apply the requirements to interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted SFAS 165
with regard to our interim financial period ending June 30, 2009. This statement
did not affect the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 replaces SFAS
No. 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, to establish the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation
of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Corporation does not expect the
adoption of this standard to have an impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
This
section discusses the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of Emclaire Financial Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and the
Title Company, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008 and should be read in conjunction with the Corporation’s December
31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and notes presented on pages 1 through 13 of
this Form 10-Q.
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions
regarding forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words
“believes,” “anticipates,” “contemplates” and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those projected. Those risks and uncertainties include changes in interest
rates, the ability to control costs and expenses and general economic
conditions. The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any
obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or
unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such
statements.
15
CHANGES
IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total
assets increased $15.0 million or 4.0% to $390.6 million at June 30, 2009 from
$375.7 million at December 31, 2008. This increase resulted from increases in
cash and cash equivalents, securities and loans receivable, net of allowance for
loan losses, of $3.7 million, $5.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The
net increase in the Corporation’s assets was primarily funded by increases in
customer deposits and borrowed funds.
Total
liabilities increased $15.4 million or 4.5% to $354.9 million at June 30, 2009
from $339.5 million at December 31, 2008, while total stockholders’ equity
decreased to $35.7 million at June 30, 2009 from $36.1 million at December 31,
2008. The increase in total liabilities resulted primarily from increases in
customer deposits and borrowed funds of $5.3 million and $11.4 million,
respectively.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of Results for the Three Month Periods Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
General. Net income decreased
$133,000 or 24.6% to $408,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from
$541,000 for the same period in 2008. This decrease was the result of increases
in the provision for loan losses and noninterest expense of $455,000 and
$603,000, respectively, partially offset by increases in net interest income and
noninterest income of $415,000 and $423,000, respectively, and a decrease in the
provision for income taxes of $87,000.
Net interest income. Net
interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased $448,000 or 16.8% to $3.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $2.7 million for the same
period in 2008. This net increase can be attributed to an increase in tax
equivalent interest income of $259,000 and a decrease in interest expense of
$189,000.
Interest income. Interest
income on a tax equivalent basis increased $259,000 or 5.6% to $4.9 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $4.7 million for the same
period in the prior year. This increase can be attributed to increases in
interest on loans, securities and interest-earning deposits with banks of
$217,000, $13,000 and $51,000, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in
dividends on federal bank stocks of $22,000.
Tax
equivalent interest earned on loans receivable increased $217,000 or 5.5% to
$4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $4.0 million
for the same period in 2008. This increase resulted primarily from average loans
increasing $33.1 million or 13.7%, accounting for $518,000 in additional loan
interest income. This increase can be attributed to growth in the Corporation’s
commercial loan portfolios and loans acquired through the merger of Elk County
Savings and Loan Association (ECSLA) in the fourth quarter of 2008. Offsetting
this volume increase, the yield on loans receivable decreased 50 basis points to
6.11% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, versus 6.61% for the same period
in 2008, due to a decline in market interest rates, accounting for a $301,000
decrease in interest income.
Tax
equivalent interest earned on securities increased $13,000 or 2.0% to $658,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $645,000 for the same
period in 2008. The average volume of securities increased $1.9 million,
primarily through municipal bond purchases, accounting for a $22,000 increase in
interest income. Offsetting this volume increase, the average yield on
securities decreased 8 basis points to 4.70% for the three months ended June 30,
2009, versus 4.78% for the same period in 2008, due to declining market interest
rates. This unfavorable yield variance accounted for a $9,000 decrease in
interest income.
Interest
earned on interest-earning deposit accounts increased $51,000 to $87,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 from $36,000 for the same period in 2008. The
average volume of these assets increased $16.9 million, due in part to
investments made in certificates of deposit with other financial institutions,
increasing interest income by $62,000. Offsetting this volume increase, the
average yield on interest-earning deposit accounts decreased 49 basis points to
1.54% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 2.03% for the same
period in the prior year, accounting for an $11,000 decrease in interest income.
This yield decrease was a result of the continued low interest rate environment
during 2008 and 2009.
Dividends
on federal bank stocks decreased $22,000 or 88.0% to $3,000 for the three month
period ended June 30, 2009 from $25,000 for the same period in 2008. The average
yield on these assets decreased 337 basis points to 0.29% for the three months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to 3.66% for the same period the prior year, due
to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB) suspending the payment of
dividends as announced in late December 2008.
16
Interest expense. Interest
expense decreased $189,000 or 9.5% to $1.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 from $2.0 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease in
interest expense can be attributed to a decrease in interest incurred on
deposits and borrowed funds of $133,000 and $56,000, respectively.
Interest
expense incurred on deposits decreased $133,000 or 8.6% to $1.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared $1.6 million for the same period in
2008. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 71 basis points to 2.35%
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 3.06% for the same period
in 2008 causing a $392,000 decrease in interest expense. This decrease was a
result of the continuous downward trend in deposit market rates during 2008 and
2009. Partially offsetting this favorable rate variance, the average volume of
interest-bearing deposits increased $37.9 million or 18.6% to $242.3 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $204.4 million for the same
period in 2008 causing a $259,000 increase in interest expense. Contributing to
the increase in deposits was the acquisition of ECSLA in the fourth quarter of
2008 and the addition of a branch office in Grove City, Pennsylvania in the
second quarter of 2008.
Interest
expense incurred on borrowed funds decreased $56,000 or 12.6% to $389,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $445,000 for the same period
in the prior year. This decrease in interest expense can be attributed to a
decrease in the average balance of borrowed funds of $3.7 million or 8.4% to
$40.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $44.3
million for the same period in the prior year, causing a $37,000 decrease in
interest expense. This volume decrease was related to the reduced need for
short-term funding in light of current deposit levels. Also contributing to the
decrease in interest expense, the cost of borrowed funds decreased 19 basis
points to 3.85% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 4.04% for
the same period in 2008 causing a $19,000 decrease in interest expense. This
cost decrease was a result of the low rate environment during the second half of
2008 and 2009.
17
Average Balance Sheet and Yield/Rate
Analysis. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
information concerning the total dollar amounts of interest income from
interest-earning assets and the resulting average yields, the total dollar
amounts of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting
average costs, net interest income, interest rate spread and the net interest
margin earned on average interest-earning assets. For purposes of this table,
average loan balances include non-accrual loans and exclude the allowance for
loan losses and interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees.
Interest and yields on tax-exempt loans and securities (tax-exempt for federal
income tax purposes) are shown on a fully tax equivalent basis. The information
is based on average daily balances during the periods presented.
Three
months ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Yield
/
|
Average
|
Yield
/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
taxable
|
$ | 257,198 | $ | 4,009 | 6.25 | % | $ | 234,664 | $ | 3,865 | 6.62 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans,
tax exempt
|
16,624 | 165 | 3.98 | % | 6,072 | 92 | 6.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
loans receivable
|
273,822 | 4,174 | 6.11 | % | 240,736 | 3,957 | 6.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities,
taxable
|
39,329 | 383 | 3.91 | % | 39,934 | 412 | 4.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities,
tax exempt
|
16,833 | 275 | 6.56 | % | 14,332 | 233 | 6.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
securities
|
56,162 | 658 | 4.70 | % | 54,266 | 645 | 4.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
22,689 | 87 | 1.54 | % | 7,148 | 36 | 2.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
4,125 | 3 | 0.29 | % | 2,751 | 25 | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning cash equivalents
|
26,814 | 90 | 1.35 | % | 9,899 | 61 | 2.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
356,798 | 4,922 | 5.53 | % | 304,901 | 4,663 | 6.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
2,173 | 5,569 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-earning assets
|
16,556 | 14,590 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 375,527 | $ | 325,060 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 116,495 | 259 | 0.89 | % | $ | 87,112 | 311 | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
125,829 | 1,162 | 3.70 | % | 117,290 | 1,243 | 4.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
242,325 | 1,421 | 2.35 | % | 204,402 | 1,554 | 3.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds, short-term
|
5,561 | 4 | 0.30 | % | 9,291 | 53 | 2.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds, long-term
|
35,000 | 385 | 4.41 | % | 35,000 | 392 | 4.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
borrowed funds
|
40,561 | 389 | 3.85 | % | 44,291 | 445 | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
282,885 | 1,810 | 2.57 | % | 248,693 | 1,999 | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
52,757 | - | - | 48,878 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Funding
and cost of funds
|
335,643 | 1,810 | 2.16 | % | 297,571 | 1,999 | 2.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
3,882 | 2,466 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
339,524 | 300,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
36,003 | 25,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 375,527 | $ | 325,060 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 3,112 | $ | 2,664 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread
(difference between weighted average rate on interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities)
|
2.96 | % | 2.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (net
interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning
assets)
|
3.50 | % | 3.51 | % |
18
Analysis of Changes in Net Interest
Income. The following table analyzes the changes in interest income and
interest expense in terms of: (1) changes in volume of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities and (2) changes in yields and rates. The table
reflects the extent to which changes in the Corporation’s interest income and
interest expense are attributable to changes in rate (change in rate multiplied
by prior year volume), changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior
year rate) and changes attributable to the combined impact of volume/rate
(change in rate multiplied by change in volume). The changes attributable to the
combined impact of volume/rate are allocated on a consistent basis between the
volume and rate variances. Changes in interest income on loans and securities
reflect the changes in interest income on a fully tax equivalent
basis.
Three
months ended June 30,
2009
versus 2008
Increase
(Decrease) due to
|
||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 518 | $ | (301 | ) | $ | 217 | |||||
Securities
|
22 | (9 | ) | 13 | ||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
62 | (11 | ) | 51 | ||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
9 | (31 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
611 | (352 | ) | 259 | ||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
259 | (392 | ) | (133 | ) | |||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
(37 | ) | (19 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
222 | (411 | ) | (189 | ) | |||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 389 | $ | 59 | $ | 448 |
Provision for loan losses. The
Corporation records provisions for loan losses to maintain a level of total
allowance for loan losses that management believes, to the best of its
knowledge, covers all known and inherent losses that are both probable and
reasonably estimable at each reporting date. Management considers historical
loss experience, the present and prospective financial condition of borrowers,
current conditions (particularly as they relate to markets where the Corporation
originates loans), the status of non-performing assets, the estimated underlying
value of the collateral and other factors related to the collectability of the
loan portfolio.
Information
pertaining to the allowance for loan losses and non-performing assets for the
quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
At
or for the three months ended
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Balance
at the beginning of the period
|
$ | 2,885 | $ | 2,218 | ||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
540 | 85 | ||||||
Charge-offs
|
(501 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
|
11 | 15 | ||||||
Balance
at the end of the period
|
$ | 2,935 | $ | 2,301 | ||||
Non-performing
loans
|
$ | 2,208 | $ | 986 | ||||
Non-performing
assets
|
2,746 | 1,030 | ||||||
Non-performing
loans to total loans
|
0.81 | % | 0.40 | % | ||||
Non-performing
assets to total assets
|
0.70 | % | 0.31 | % | ||||
Allowance
for loan losses to total loans
|
1.08 | % | 0.94 | % | ||||
Allowance
for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
132.94 | % | 233.37 | % |
19
The
provision for loan losses increased $455,000 to $540,000 for the three month
period ended June 30, 2009 from $85,000 for the same period in the prior year.
This increase was attributable to management’s estimates of the impact on the
loan portfolio of credit defaults related to the continued economic climate, the
elevated level of charge-offs and the aforementioned loan growth.
Noninterest income.
Noninterest income increased $423,000 or 85.3% to $919,000 during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $496,000 during the same period in the
prior year. This increase was the result of gains of $184,000 recorded on the
sale of investment securities in 2009 compared to impairment charges of $275,000
recorded in 2008 related to certain marketable equity securities, increased
commissions earned on financial services and the addition of title premium
income in 2009 related to the Corporation’s newly formed title company in late
2008. Partially offsetting these favorable items was a decrease in customer
service fee income.
Noninterest expense.
Noninterest expense increased $603,000 or 26.3% to $2.9 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2008.
This increase in noninterest expense can be attributed to increases in
compensation and employee benefits, premises and equipment and other noninterest
expenses of $155,000, $25,000 and $423,000, respectively.
Compensation
and employee benefits increased $155,000 or 12.1% to $1.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $1.3 million for the same period in the
prior year. This increase can be attributed to the addition of personnel
associated with the Grove City, Pennsylvania branch office opened in the second
quarter of 2008 and general salary and wage increases.
Premises
and equipment increased $25,000 or 6.0% to $443,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to $418,000 for the same period in the prior year. This
increase was primarily related to costs associated with the aforementioned
branch office opening.
Other
noninterest expense increased $423,000 or 71.5% to $1.0 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $592,000 for the same period in the
prior year. This increase was primarily due to an increase in professional fees
associated with the Bank’s proposed purchase of a branch office in Titusville,
Pennsylvania and increased federal deposit insurance expense due to an increase
in the deposit insurance premium rate schedule, a five basis point special
assessment which was assessed on all FDIC insured depository institutions to be
collected on September 30, 2009, and the absence of deposit insurance credits in
2009 that reduced costs for 2008.
Provision for income taxes.
The provision for income taxes decreased $87,000 or 61.7% to $54,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $141,000 for the same period in
the prior year. This decrease was due to lower pre-tax income and a lower
effective tax rate in 2009 compared to 2008.
Comparison
of Results for the Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
General. Net income decreased
$24,000 or 2.2% to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008. This decrease was the result of increases in the
provision for loan losses and noninterest expense of $692,000 and $810,000,
respectively, partially offset by increases in net interest income and
noninterest income of $933,000 and $482,000, respectively, and a decrease in the
provision for income taxes of $63,000.
Net interest income. Net
interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased $978,000 or 18.4% to $6.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $5.3 million for the same
period in 2008. This net increase can be attributed to an increase in tax
equivalent interest income of $761,000 and a decrease in interest expense of
$217,000.
Interest income. Interest
income on a tax equivalent basis increased $761,000 or 8.2% to $10.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $9.3 million for the same period
in the prior year. This increase can be attributed to increases in interest on
loans, securities and interest-earning deposits with banks of $540,000, $151,000
and $117,000, respectively, partially offset by a decrease in dividends on
federal bank stocks of $47,000.
20
Tax
equivalent interest earned on loans receivable increased $540,000 or 6.8% to
$8.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $7.9 million
for the same period in 2008. This increase resulted primarily from average loans
increasing $39.4 million or 16.6%, accounting for $1.2 million in additional
loan interest income. This increase can be attributed to growth in the
Corporation’s commercial loan portfolios and loans acquired through the merger
of ECSLA in the fourth quarter of 2008. Offsetting this volume increase, the
yield on loans receivable decreased 55 basis points to 6.16% for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, versus 6.71% for the same period in 2008, due to a decline
in market interest rates, accounting for a $702,000 decrease in interest
income.
Tax
equivalent interest earned on securities increased $151,000 or 12.0% to $1.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $1.3 million for the
same period in 2008. The average volume of securities increased $7.8 million or
15.4%, primarily through U.S. Government agency and mortgage-backed security
purchases, accounting for an $189,000 increase in interest income. Offsetting
this volume increase, the average yield on securities decreased 13 basis points
to 4.86% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, versus 4.99% for the same
period in 2008, due to declining market interest rates. This unfavorable yield
variance accounted for a $38,000 decrease in interest income.
Interest
earned on interest-earning deposit accounts increased $117,000 to $176,000 for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $59,000 for the same period in 2008. The
average volume of these assets increased $18.5 million, primarily due to
investments made in certificates of deposit with other financial institutions,
increasing interest income by $140,000. Offsetting this volume increase, the
average yield on interest-earning deposit accounts decreased 67 basis points to
1.59% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 2.26% for the same
period in the prior year, accounting for a $23,000 decrease in interest income.
This yield decrease was a result of the continued low interest rate environment
during 2008 and 2009.
Dividends
on federal bank stocks decreased $47,000 or 85.5% to $8,000 for the six month
period ended June 30, 2009 from $55,000 for the same period in 2008. The average
yield on these assets decreased 379 basis points to 0.41% for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to 4.20% for the same period the prior year, due
to the FHLB suspending the payment of dividends as announced in late December
2008.
Interest expense. Interest
expense decreased $217,000 or 5.5% to $3.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009 compared to $4.0 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease in
interest expense can be attributed to a decrease in interest incurred on
deposits and borrowed funds of $165,000 and $52,000, respectively.
Interest
expense incurred on deposits decreased $165,000 or 5.3% to $3.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 compared $3.1 million for the same period in
2008. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 65 basis points to 2.49%
for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 3.14% for the same period in
2008 causing a $726,000 decrease in interest expense. This rate decrease was
primarily due to the continued decline in market interest rates during the
second half of 2008 and 2009. Partially offsetting this favorable rate variance,
the average volume of interest-bearing deposits increased $40.0 million or 20.0%
to $240.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $200.0
million for the same period in 2008 causing a $561,000 increase in interest
expense. The acquisition of ECSLA and the opening of the Grove City,
Pennsylvania branch office in 2008 contributed to the increase in
deposits.
Interest
expense incurred on borrowed funds decreased $52,000 or 6.1% to $799,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $851,000 for the same period in the
prior year. This decrease in interest expense can be attributed to a decrease in
the cost of borrowed funds of 81 basis points to 3.33% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to 4.14% for the same period in 2008 causing an $185,000
decrease in interest expense. This cost decrease was a result of the overall low
cost to borrow in late 2008 and 2009. Partially offsetting this cost decrease,
the average volume of borrowed funds increased $7.2 million or 17.3% to $48.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $41.3 million for
the same period in 2008 causing a $133,000 increase in interest expense. This
volume increase was primarily related to an increase in short-term borrowings
utilized to fund certain investment security purchases.
21
Average Balance Sheet and Yield/Rate
Analysis. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
information concerning the total dollar amounts of interest income from
interest-earning assets and the resulting average yields, the total dollar
amounts of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting
average costs, net interest income, interest rate spread and the net interest
margin earned on average interest-earning assets. For purposes of this table,
average loan balances include non-accrual loans and exclude the allowance for
loan losses and interest income includes accretion of net deferred loan fees.
Interest and yields on tax-exempt loans and securities (tax-exempt for federal
income tax purposes) are shown on a fully tax equivalent basis. The information
is based on average daily balances during the periods presented.
Six
months ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Yield
/
|
Average
|
Yield
/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
Balance
|
Interest
|
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans,
taxable
|
$ | 260,137 | $ | 8,129 | 6.30 | % | $ | 231,135 | $ | 7,727 | 6.72 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans,
tax exempt
|
16,499 | 328 | 4.01 | % | 6,078 | 190 | 6.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
loans receivable
|
276,636 | 8,457 | 6.16 | % | 237,213 | 7,917 | 6.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities,
taxable
|
43,191 | 911 | 4.25 | % | 36,296 | 789 | 4.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities,
tax exempt
|
15,257 | 497 | 6.57 | % | 14,346 | 468 | 6.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
securities
|
58,448 | 1,408 | 4.86 | % | 50,642 | 1,257 | 4.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
22,379 | 176 | 1.59 | % | 5,249 | 59 | 2.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
3,962 | 8 | 0.41 | % | 2,635 | 55 | 4.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning cash equivalents
|
26,341 | 184 | 1.41 | % | 7,884 | 114 | 2.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
361,424 | 10,049 | 5.61 | % | 295,739 | 9,288 | 6.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
2,174 | 5,399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-earning assets
|
16,544 | 14,601 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 380,143 | $ | 315,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
$ | 112,987 | 572 | 1.02 | % | $ | 83,035 | 594 | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
127,059 | 2,389 | 3.79 | % | 117,014 | 2,532 | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
240,046 | 2,961 | 2.49 | % | 200,049 | 3,126 | 3.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds, long-term
|
35,000 | 772 | 4.45 | % | 35,000 | 782 | 4.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds, short-term
|
13,473 | 28 | 0.42 | % | 6,319 | 69 | 2.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
borrowed funds
|
48,473 | 799 | 3.33 | % | 41,319 | 851 | 4.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
288,520 | 3,760 | 2.63 | % | 241,368 | 3,977 | 3.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
demand deposits
|
51,542 | - | - | 47,018 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Funding
and cost of funds
|
340,062 | 3,760 | 2.23 | % | 288,386 | 3,977 | 2.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other
noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
4,048 | 2,428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
344,110 | 290,814 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
36,032 | 24,925 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 380,143 | $ | 315,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 6,288 | $ | 5,311 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread
(difference between weighted average rate on interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities)
|
2.98 | % | 3.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (net
interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning
assets)
|
3.51 | % | 3.61 | % |
22
Analysis of Changes in Net Interest
Income. The following table analyzes the changes in interest income and
interest expense in terms of: (1) changes in volume of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities and (2) changes in yields and rates. The table
reflects the extent to which changes in the Corporation’s interest income and
interest expense are attributable to changes in rate (change in rate multiplied
by prior year volume), changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior
year rate) and changes attributable to the combined impact of volume/rate
(change in rate multiplied by change in volume). The changes attributable to the
combined impact of volume/rate are allocated on a consistent basis between the
volume and rate variances. Changes in interest income on loans and securities
reflect the changes in interest income on a fully tax equivalent
basis.
Six
months ended June 30,
2009
versus 2008
Increase
(Decrease) due to
|
||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands)
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 1,242 | $ | (702 | ) | $ | 540 | |||||
Securities
|
189 | (38 | ) | 151 | ||||||||
Interest-earning
deposits with banks
|
140 | (23 | ) | 117 | ||||||||
Federal
bank stocks
|
19 | (66 | ) | (47 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,590 | (829 | ) | 761 | ||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||
Deposits
|
561 | (726 | ) | (165 | ) | |||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
133 | (185 | ) | (52 | ) | |||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
694 | (911 | ) | (217 | ) | |||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 896 | $ | 82 | $ | 978 |
Provision for loan losses. The
Corporation records provisions for loan losses to maintain a level of total
allowance for loan losses that management believes, to the best of its
knowledge, covers all known and inherent losses that are both probable and
reasonably estimable at each reporting date. Management considers historical
loss experience, the present and prospective financial condition of borrowers,
current conditions (particularly as they relate to markets where the Corporation
originates loans), the status of non-performing assets, the estimated underlying
value of the collateral and other factors related to the collectability of the
loan portfolio.
Information
pertaining to the allowance for loan losses and non-performing assets for the
quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
At
or for the six months
ended
June
30,
|
At
or for the year ended
December
31,
|
|||||||||||
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
2008
|
|||||||||
Balance
at the beginning of the period
|
$ | 2,651 | $ | 2,157 | $ | 2,157 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses of ECSLA
|
- | - | 206 | |||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
837 | 145 | 500 | |||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(572 | ) | (27 | ) | (252 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries
|
19 | 26 | 40 | |||||||||
Balance
at the end of the period
|
$ | 2,935 | $ | 2,301 | $ | 2,651 | ||||||
Non-performing
loans
|
$ | 2,208 | $ | 986 | 1,011 | |||||||
Non-performing
assets
|
2,746 | 1,030 | 1,061 | |||||||||
Non-performing
loans to total loans
|
0.81 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||||
Non-performing
assets to total assets
|
0.70 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.28 | % | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses to total loans
|
1.08 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.99 | % | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
132.94 | % | 233.37 | % | 262.22 | % |
23
The
provision for loan losses increased $692,000 to $837,000 for the six month
period ended June 30, 2009 from $145,000 for the same period in the prior year.
This increase was attributable to management’s estimates of the impact on the
loan portfolio of credit defaults related to the continued economic climate, the
increased level of charge-offs and the aforementioned loan growth.
Noninterest income.
Noninterest income increased $482,000 or 41.7% to $1.6 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $1.2 million during the same period in
the prior year. This increase can primarily be attributed to gains of $240,000
recorded on the sale of investment securities in 2009 compared to impairment
charges of $275,000 recorded in 2008 related to the deterioration of certain
marketable equity securities. Also, commissions earned on financial services and
title company revenue were higher in 2009 due to increased activity. Partially
offsetting these items was a decrease in customer service fees.
Noninterest expense.
Noninterest expense increased $811,000 or 17.2% to $5.5 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2008.
This increase in noninterest expense can be attributed to an increase in
compensation and employee benefits, premises and equipment and other noninterest
expenses of $175,000, $86,000 and $549,000, respectively.
Compensation
and employee benefits increased $175,000 or 6.5% to $2.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $2.7 million for the same period in 2008.
This increase can be attributed primarily to the addition of personnel
associated with the 2008 Grove City, Pennsylvania branch office opening and
normal salary and wage increases.
Premises
and equipment increased $86,000 or 10.3% to $925,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to $839,000 for the same period in the prior year. This
increase was primarily related to added costs associated with the aforementioned
branch office opening as well as higher than normal winter maintenance
costs.
Other
noninterest expense increased $549,000 or 47.0% to $1.7 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $1.2 million for the same period in the
prior year. This increase was primarily associated with an increase in
professional fees related to the Bank’s proposed purchase of a branch office in
Titusville, PA and increased federal deposit insurance expense due to an
increase in the deposit insurance premium rate schedule, a five basis point
special assessment which was assessed on all FDIC insured depository
institutions to be collected on September 30, 2009, and the absence of deposit
insurance credits in 2009 that reduced costs for 2008.
Provision for income taxes.
The provision for income taxes decreased $63,000 or 20.3% to $248,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $311,000 for the same period in the
prior year. This decrease was a result of lower pre-tax income and a lower
effective tax rate in 2009 versus 2008.
LIQUIDITY
The
Corporation’s primary sources of funds generally have been deposits obtained
through the offices of the Bank, borrowings from the FHLB and Federal Reserve
and amortization and prepayments of outstanding loans and maturing securities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation used its sources of
funds primarily to fund loan originations and security purchases. As of such
date, the Corporation had outstanding loan commitments, including undisbursed
loans and amounts available under credit lines, totaling $24.9 million, and
standby letters of credit totaling $1.0 million.
At June
30, 2009, time deposits amounted to $119.2 million or 40.8% of the Corporation’s
total consolidated deposits, including approximately $35.4 million of which are
scheduled to mature within the next year. Management of the Corporation believes
it has adequate resources to fund all of its commitments, all of its commitments
will be funded as required by related maturity dates and based upon past
experience and current pricing policies it can adjust the rates of time deposits
to retain a substantial portion of maturing liabilities.
24
Aside
from liquidity available from customer deposits or through sales and maturities
of securities, the Corporation has alternative sources of funds such as a term
borrowing capacity from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve’s Term Auction Facility
and Discount Window. At June 30, 2009, the Corporation’s borrowing capacity with
the FHLB, net of funds borrowed, was $151.3 million.
Management
is not aware of any conditions, including any regulatory recommendations or
requirements, which would adversely impact its liquidity or its ability to meet
funding needs in the ordinary course of business.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management
views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on
subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions and where changes in
those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial
statements. Management currently views the determination of the allowance for
loan losses and the evaluation of securities for other than temporary impairment
as critical accounting policies.
The
allowance for loan losses provides for an estimate of probable losses in the
loan portfolio. In determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan
losses, the loan portfolio is separated into risk-rated and homogeneous pools.
Migration analysis/historical loss rates, adjusted for relevant trends, have
been applied to these pools. Qualitative adjustments are then applied to the
portfolio to allow for quality of lending policies and procedures, national and
local economic and business conditions, changes in the nature and volume of the
portfolio, experience, ability and depth of lending management, changes in the
trends, volumes and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans and
loss and recovery trends, quality of the Corporation’s loan review system,
concentrations of credit, and external factors. The methodology used to
determine the adequacy of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses is
comprehensive and meets regulatory and accounting industry standards for
assessing the allowance, however, it is still an estimate. Loan losses are
charged against the allowance while recoveries of amounts previously charged-off
are credited to the allowance. Loan loss provisions are charged against current
earnings based on management’s periodic evaluation and review of the factors
indicated above.
Management
evaluates securities for other than temporary impairment at least on a quarterly
basis, and more frequently when economic, market or other concerns warrant such
evaluation. Consideration is given to: (1) the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) whether the Corporation has the intent
or need to sell an investment prior to recovery or maturity.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
Market
risk for the Corporation consists primarily of interest rate risk exposure and
liquidity risk. Since virtually all of the interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities are at the Bank, virtually all of the interest rate
risk and liquidity risk lies at the Bank level. The Bank is not subject to
currency exchange risk or commodity price risk, and has no trading portfolio,
and therefore, is not subject to any trading risk. In addition, the Bank does
not participate in hedging transactions such as interest rate swaps and caps.
Changes in interest rates will impact both income and expense recorded and also
the market value of long-term interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. Interest rate risk and liquidity risk management is performed at
the Bank level. Although the Bank has a diversified loan portfolio, loans
outstanding to individuals and businesses depend upon the local economic
conditions in the immediate trade area.
One of
the primary functions of the Corporation’s asset/liability management committee
is to monitor the level to which the balance sheet is subject to interest rate
risk. The goal of the asset/liability committee is to manage the relationship
between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, thereby minimizing the
fluctuations in the net interest margin, which achieves consistent growth of net
interest income during periods of changing interest rates.
25
Interest
rate sensitivity is the result of differences in the amounts and repricing dates
of the Bank’s rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. These
differences, or interest rate repricing “gap”, provide an indication of the
extent that the Corporation’s net interest income is affected by future changes
in interest rates. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest
rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities
and is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive
liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets. Generally,
during a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would adversely affect
net interest income while a positive gap would result in an increase in net
interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a
negative gap would result in an increase in net interest income and a positive
gap would adversely affect net interest income. The closer to zero that gap is
maintained, generally, the lesser the impact of market interest rate changes on
net interest income.
Based on
certain assumptions provided by a federal regulatory agency, which management
believes most accurately represents the sensitivity of the Corporation’s assets
and liabilities to interest rate changes, at June 30, 2009, the
Corporation’s interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within one year
totaled $124.6 million while the Corporation’s interest-bearing liabilities
maturing or repricing within one-year totaled $140.0 million, providing an
excess of interest-bearing liabilities over interest-earning assets of
$15.4 million. At June 30, 2009, the percentage of the Corporation’s assets
to liabilities maturing or repricing within one year was 89.0%.
For more
information, see “Market Risk Management” in the Corporation’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 4T. Controls and
Procedures
The
Corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Corporation’s Exchange
Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Principal Accounting Officer (PAO), as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on
the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule
13a-15(e).
There has
been no change made in the Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control
over financial reporting.
As of
June 30, 2009, the Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision
and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the
Corporation’s CEO and PAO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing,
the Corporation’s CEO and PAO concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective. There have been no significant changes
in the Corporation’s internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date the
Corporation completed its evaluation.
PART II - OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings
The
Corporation is involved in various legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary
course of business. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with
legal counsel, that these matters will not materially affect the Corporation’s
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
There
have been no material changes in the Corporation’s risk factors from those
previously disclosed in the 2008 Form 10-K.
26
Item 2. Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a)
|
The
annual meeting of stockholders of the Corporation was held April 22, 2009.
Of 1,431,404 common shares eligible to vote, 1,091,425 or 76.2% were voted
in person or by proxy.
|
(b)
|
The
following Class B directors were elected for a three year term expiring in
2012:
|
Name
|
Shares
For
|
Shares
Withheld
|
||||||
Ronald
L. Ashbaugh
|
987,094 | 104,331 | ||||||
George
W. Freeman
|
950,837 | 140,588 | ||||||
William
C. Marsh
|
1,077,172 | 14,253 | ||||||
Brian
C. McCarrier
|
1,077,891 | 13,534 |
In
addition to the above listed individuals, the following persons continue to
serve as directors: David L. Cox, James M. Crooks, Mark A. Freemer, Robert L.
Hunter and John B. Mason.
The
recommendation of the Board of Directors to ratify the appointment of Beard
Miller Company LLP as the Corporation’s independent auditors, as described in
the proxy statement for the annual meeting was approved with 1,080,414 shares in
favor, 7,990 shares against and 3,021 shares abstained.
The
recommendation of the Board of Directors to approve the compensation of the
Corporation’s executives, as detailed in the proxy statement for the annual
meeting was approved with 930,066 shares in favor, 132,815 shares against and
28,544 shares abstained.
Item 5. Other
Information
(a)
|
Not
applicable.
|
(b)
|
Not
applicable.
|
Item 6.
Exhibits
Exhibit
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|
|
Exhibit
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
Exhibit
32.1
|
CEO
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
|
Exhibit
32.2
|
CFO
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350
|
27
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
EMCLAIRE
FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||
Date:
August 14, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ William C.
Marsh
|
|
William
C. Marsh
|
|||
Chairman
of the Board,
|
|||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Date:
August 14, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Amanda L.
Engles
|
|
Amanda
L. Engles
|
|||
Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer
|
28