EMMIS CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 November (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2011
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
INDIANA
(State of incorporation or organization)
(State of incorporation or organization)
0-23264
(Commission file number)
(Commission file number)
35-1542018
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
ONE EMMIS PLAZA
40 MONUMENT CIRCLE, SUITE 700
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204
(Address of principal executive offices)
40 MONUMENT CIRCLE, SUITE 700
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204
(Address of principal executive offices)
(317) 266-0100
(Registrants Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, and accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of Emmis Communications Corporations classes of
common stock, as of January 4, 2012, was:
34,007,279 4,722,684 0 |
Shares of Class A Common Stock, $.01 Par Value Shares of Class B Common Stock, $.01 Par Value Shares of Class C Common Stock, $.01 Par Value |
INDEX
-2-
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
November 30, | November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
NET REVENUES |
$ | 66,322 | $ | 59,319 | $ | 193,240 | $ | 185,086 | ||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization
expense of $1,989, $1,342, $6,059 and $5,017, respectively |
49,131 | 47,903 | 149,375 | 149,386 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization
expense of $307, $409, $1,007 and $955, respectively |
3,403 | 4,972 | 13,278 | 15,276 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,296 | 1,751 | 7,066 | 5,972 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
3 | | 3 | 814 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
54,833 | 54,626 | 169,722 | 171,448 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME |
11,489 | 4,693 | 23,518 | 13,638 | ||||||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,195 | ) | (6,257 | ) | (16,084 | ) | (21,681 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
| (525 | ) | | (2,003 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC |
| 31,805 | | 31,805 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
(132 | ) | (394 | ) | (238 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(5,327 | ) | 24,629 | (16,322 | ) | 8,069 | ||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
6,162 | 29,322 | 7,196 | 21,707 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES |
4,068 | (27,477 | ) | 4,316 | (26,987 | ) | ||||||||||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
2,094 | 56,799 | 2,880 | 48,694 | ||||||||||||
(GAIN) LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX |
34 | (1,903 | ) | 229 | (4,693 | ) | ||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME |
2,060 | 58,702 | 2,651 | 53,387 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
1,288 | 1,069 | 3,346 | 3,813 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY |
772 | 57,633 | (695 | ) | 49,574 | |||||||||||
GAIN ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF PREFERRED STOCK |
| (55,835 | ) | | (55,835 | ) | ||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS |
2,446 | 2,603 | 7,226 | 7,689 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
$ | (1,674 | ) | $ | 110,865 | $ | (7,921 | ) | $ | 97,720 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-3-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
November 30, | November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Amounts attributable to common shareholders for basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (1,679 | ) | $ | 108,954 | $ | (8,008 | ) | $ | 92,970 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
5 | 1,911 | 87 | 4,750 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (1,674 | ) | $ | 110,865 | $ | (7,921 | ) | $ | 97,720 | ||||||
Amounts attributable to common shareholders for diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (1,679 | ) | $ | 111,557 | $ | (8,008 | ) | $ | 100,659 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
5 | 1,911 | 87 | 4,750 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (1,674 | ) | $ | 113,468 | $ | (7,921 | ) | $ | 105,409 | ||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 2.85 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 2.43 | ||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 0.05 | | 0.13 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 2.90 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 2.56 | ||||||
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
37,844 | 38,219 | 37,802 | 38,210 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 2.44 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 2.19 | ||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 2.49 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 2.29 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
37,844 | 45,647 | 37,802 | 45,950 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-4-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
November 30, | ||||||||
February 28, | 2011 | |||||||
2011 | (Unaudited) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 6,068 | $ | 9,882 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
38,930 | 37,805 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
13,615 | 13,379 | ||||||
Other current assets |
2,329 | 1,625 | ||||||
Current assets discontinued operations |
2,063 | 1,475 | ||||||
Total current assets |
63,005 | 64,166 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
44,816 | 39,776 | ||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Note 3): |
||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangibles |
328,796 | 213,009 | ||||||
Goodwill |
24,175 | 24,175 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
2,689 | 2,057 | ||||||
Total intangible assets |
355,660 | 239,241 | ||||||
INVESTMENTS |
2,814 | 17,463 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS, NET |
5,237 | 5,042 | ||||||
NONCURRENT ASSETS DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
945 | 18 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 472,477 | $ | 365,706 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-5-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(In thousands, except share data)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(In thousands, except share data)
November 30, | ||||||||
February 28, | 2011 | |||||||
2011 | (Unaudited) | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 9,815 | $ | 9,782 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
3,293 | 11,985 | ||||||
Accrued salaries and commissions |
9,757 | 8,889 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
3,147 | 3,082 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
18,595 | 15,948 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
5,409 | 6,294 | ||||||
Current liabilities discontinued operations |
854 | 560 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
50,870 | 56,540 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES |
327,704 | 224,991 | ||||||
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
14,018 | 10,467 | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
81,411 | 52,925 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
474,003 | 344,923 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
SERIES A CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK,
$0.01 PAR VALUE; $50.00 LIQUIDATION PREFERENCE;
AUTHORIZED 2,875,000 SHARES; ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING
2,809,170 SHARES AT FEBRUARY 28, 2011 AND 2,612,420 SHARES
AT NOVEMBER 30, 2011. EMMIS HAS OBTAINED RIGHTS IN
1,484,679 OF THE SHARES OUTSTANDING AS OF
NOVEMBER 30, 2011. SEE NOTE 11. |
140,459 | 56,387 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT: |
||||||||
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 170,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 33,499,770 shares at February 28, 2011
and 33,503,666 shares at November 30, 2011 |
335 | 335 | ||||||
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 4,722,684 shares at February 28, 2011
and
November 30, 2011, respectively |
47 | 47 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
528,786 | 529,440 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(720,693 | ) | (615,284 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,776 | 1,645 | ||||||
Total shareholders deficit |
(189,749 | ) | (83,817 | ) | ||||
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
47,764 | 48,213 | ||||||
Total deficit |
(141,985 | ) | (35,604 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and deficit |
$ | 472,477 | $ | 365,706 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-6-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN DEFICIT
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Common Stock | Paid-in | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Noncontrolling | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income | Interests | Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2011 |
33,499,770 | $ | 335 | 4,722,684 | $ | 47 | $ | 528,786 | $ | (720,693 | ) | $ | 1,776 | $ | 47,764 | $ | (141,985 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Common Stock to employees
and officers and related income tax benefits |
(6,104 | ) | 651 | 651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits |
10,000 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of additional controlling interests |
(246 | ) | (246 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments of dividends and
distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(3,085 | ) | (3,085 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock purchase transactions |
55,835 | 55,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
49,574 | 3,813 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in value of derivative instrument and
related income tax effects |
(489 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment |
358 | (33 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | | | | 53,223 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, NOVEMBER 30, 2011 |
33,503,666 | $ | 335 | 4,722,684 | $ | 47 | $ | 529,440 | $ | (615,284 | ) | $ | 1,645 | $ | 48,213 | $ | (35,604 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-7-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended November 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Consolidated net income |
$ | 2,651 | $ | 53,387 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities |
||||||||
Discontinued operations |
229 | (4,693 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of controlling interest in Merlin
Media LLC |
| (31,805 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
7,956 | 6,511 | ||||||
Noncash accretion of debt instruments |
| 2,652 | ||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
| 2,003 | ||||||
Provision for bad debts |
568 | 339 | ||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
5,003 | (29,273 | ) | |||||
Noncash compensation |
1,396 | 777 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on equity method investments, net |
(25 | ) | 312 | |||||
Loss on sale of assets |
3 | 814 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(7,846 | ) | 845 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
2,404 | 290 | ||||||
Other assets |
(94 | ) | (374 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
1,971 | (1,045 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
(6,288 | ) | (2,424 | ) | ||||
Income taxes |
(237 | ) | 2,402 | |||||
Other liabilities |
(1,445 | ) | (1,099 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities discontinued operations |
1,591 | 116 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
7,837 | (265 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(2,380 | ) | (3,259 | ) | ||||
Sale of controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC |
| 130,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment |
| 160 | ||||||
Distributions from and proceeds from sale of equity investments |
25 | 1,293 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities discontinued operations |
(163 | ) | 5,551 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(2,518 | ) | 133,745 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-8-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended November 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(12,537 | ) | (139,655 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
16,000 | 45,493 | ||||||
Acquisition of rights in and purchase of preferred stock |
| (28,237 | ) | |||||
Debt-related costs |
| (4,163 | ) | |||||
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(2,454 | ) | (3,085 | ) | ||||
Settlement of tax withholding obligations on stock issued to employees |
(82 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||
Other |
| 3 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities discontinued operations |
(386 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
541 | (129,718 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(77 | ) | 52 | |||||
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
5,783 | 3,814 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
6,814 | 6,068 | ||||||
End of period |
$ | 12,597 | $ | 9,882 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: |
||||||||
Cash paid for - |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 16,372 | $ | 20,742 | ||||
Income taxes, net of refunds |
640 | 1,277 | ||||||
Noncash financing transactions- |
||||||||
Value of stock issued to employees under stock compensation
program and to satisfy accrued incentives |
1,368 | 725 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.
-9-
Table of Contents
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
November 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Preparation of Interim Financial Statements
Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the
condensed consolidated interim financial statements included herein have been prepared, without
audit, by Emmis Communications Corporation (ECC) and its subsidiaries (collectively, our, us,
we, Emmis or the Company). As permitted under the applicable rules and regulations of the
SEC, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations; however, Emmis
believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Annual Report for Emmis
filed on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2011. The Companys results are subject to
seasonal fluctuations. Therefore, results shown on an interim basis are not necessarily indicative
of results for a full year.
In the opinion of Emmis, the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements
contain all material adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly the consolidated financial position of Emmis at November 30, 2011, the results of
its operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2011 and cash
flows for the nine-month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2011.
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss)
attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted.
Potentially dilutive securities at November 30, 2010 and 2011 consisted of stock options,
restricted stock awards and the 6.25% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock. Each share
of our outstanding preferred stock in which the Company has not obtained rights may, at the
election of the preferred holder, convert into 2.44 shares of common stock. Conversion of these
shares of preferred stock into common stock would be dilutive for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended November 30, 2011. As such, the preferred dividends of $2,603 and $7,689 have been
added to net income attributable to common shareholders for purposes of calculating diluted net
income per common share for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2011,
respectively. Additionally, the weighted-average shares outstanding were increased by 6,556,510
and 6,755,809 for the assumed conversion of the preferred stock for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended November 30, 2011, respectively. Shares excluded from the calculation as the effect
of their conversion into shares of our common stock would be antidilutive were as follows:
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(shares in 000s) | (shares in 000s) | |||||||||||||||
6.25% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock |
6,854 | | 6,854 | | ||||||||||||
Stock options and restricted stock awards |
7,999 | 6,872 | 8,172 | 6,597 | ||||||||||||
Antidilutive common share equivalents |
14,853 | 6,872 | 15,026 | 6,597 | ||||||||||||
-10-
Table of Contents
Discontinued Operation Slager
On October 28, 2009, the Hungarian National Radio and Television Board (ORTT) announced that
it was awarding to another bidder the national radio license then held by our majority-owned
subsidiary, Slager. Slager ceased broadcasting effective November 19, 2009. The Company believes
that the awarding of the license to another bidder was unlawful. In October 2011, Emmis filed
for arbitration with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes seeking
resolution of its claim. In preparation for the filing of the claim, in July 2011, Emmis acquired
an additional 25% interest in Slager held by a minority shareholder for a cash purchase price of
$0.2 million, increasing its ownership to 85%. This acquisition allows Emmis to assert a
consolidated claim.
Slager had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes
certain operating results for Slager for all periods presented:
Three months ended November 30, | Nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 10 | $ | | $ | 30 | $ | 7 | ||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense |
127 | (12 | ) | 703 | 233 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
22 | (184 | ) | 281 | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(95 | ) | (100 | ) | (392 | ) | (190 | ) | ||||||||
Loss attributable to minority interests |
(39 | ) | (8 | ) | (316 | ) | (57 | ) |
Discontinued Operation Flint Peak Tower Site
On April 6, 2011, Emmis sold land, towers and other equipment at its Glendale, CA tower site
(the Flint Peak Tower Site) to Richland Towers Management Flint, Inc. for $6.0 million in cash.
In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $4.9 million.
Net proceeds from the sale were used to repay amounts outstanding under the credit facility.
The operations of the Flint Peak Tower Site had historically been included in the radio
segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results for the Flint Peak Tower Site
for all periods presented:
Three months ended November 30, | Nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 143 | $ | | $ | 411 | $ | 59 | ||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense |
25 | | 87 | 51 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
17 | | 51 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| | | 4,882 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
99 | | 271 | 4,883 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
40 | (2,003 | ) | 110 | |
-11-
Table of Contents
Summary of Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations:
As of February 28, 2011 | As of November 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Flint Peak Tower | Flint Peak Tower | |||||||||||||||
Slager | Site and Other | Slager | Site and Other | |||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,658 | $ | | $ | 1,110 | $ | | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
63 | | | | ||||||||||||
Other |
342 | | 365 | | ||||||||||||
Total current assets |
2,063 | | 1,475 | | ||||||||||||
Noncurrent assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 925 | | | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
20 | | 18 | | ||||||||||||
Total noncurrent assets |
20 | 925 | 18 | | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,083 | $ | 925 | $ | 1,493 | $ | | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and
accrued expenses |
$ | 723 | $ | 111 | $ | 466 | $ | 94 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue |
| 20 | | | ||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
$ | 723 | $ | 131 | $ | 466 | $ | 94 | ||||||||
Local Programming and Marketing Agreement Fees
The Company from time to time enters into local programming and marketing agreements (LMAs)
in connection with acquisitions or dispositions of radio stations, pending regulatory approval of
transfer of the FCC licenses. In such cases where the Company enters into an LMA in connection
with a disposition, the Company generally receives specified periodic payments in exchange for the
counterparty receiving the right to program and sell advertising for a specified portion of the
stations inventory of broadcast time. Nevertheless, as the holder of the FCC license, the Company
retains control and responsibility for the operation of the station, including responsibility over
all programming broadcast on the station.
On June 20, 2011, Emmis entered into an LMA with LMA Merlin Media LLC for WRXP-FM in New York,
WKQX-FM in Chicago and WLUP-FM in Chicago. The LMA for these stations started on July 15, 2011 and
terminated upon their sale on September 1, 2011 (see Note 9 for more discussion of the sale of the
stations). Emmis continues to operate KXOS-FM pursuant to an LMA with Grupo Radio Centro, S.A.B.
de C.V, a Mexican broadcasting company.
LMA fees, recorded as net revenues in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2011 were as
follows:
Three months ended November 30, | Nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Grupo Radio Centro LMA |
$ | 1,750 | $ | 1,750 | $ | 5,250 | $ | 5,250 | ||||||||
Merlin Media LMA |
| | | 310 | ||||||||||||
Total |
1,750 | 1,750 | 5,250 | 5,560 | ||||||||||||
-12-
Table of Contents
Investments
Emmis has various investments, the carrying values of which are summarized in the following
table:
February 28,2011 | November 30, 2011 | |||||||
Investment in common stock of Merlin Media LLC |
$ | | $ | 5,031 | ||||
Broadcast tower site investment New Jersey |
1,150 | | ||||||
Broadcast tower site investment Texas |
1,351 | 1,470 | ||||||
Other equity method investments |
124 | | ||||||
Total equity method investments |
2,625 | 6,501 | ||||||
Cost method investment in preferred stock of Merlin Media LLC |
| 10,773 | ||||||
Available-for-sale investment |
189 | 189 | ||||||
Total investments |
2,814 | 17,463 | ||||||
Equity method investments
In connection with the sale of its controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC on September 1,
2011, the Company retained a 20.6% common equity interest in Merlin Media LLC, the fair value of
which was $5.6 million as of September 1, 2011. See Note 9 for more discussion of the sale of a
controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC. Additionally, Emmis, through its partnership in the
Austin market, has a 25% ownership interest in a company that operates a tower site in Austin,
Texas.
During the nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company sold its 50% share of a
partnership in which the sole asset is land in New Jersey on which a transmission tower is located
to the other partner for $1.3 million in cash. Proceeds from the sale were used to repay amounts
outstanding under our senior credit facility.
Cost method investment
In connection with the sale of its controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC on September 1,
2011, the Company retained a preferred equity interest in Merlin Media LLC with a par value of
$28.7 million. The fair value of this preferred equity interest as of September 1, 2011, was
approximately $10.8 million. As the preferred equity interest in Merlin Media LLC is
non-redeemable and does not have a readily determinable fair value, as defined by accounting
standards, this investment is accounted for under the cost method. See Note 9 for more discussion
of the sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC.
Available for sale investment
Emmis has made investments totaling $0.5 million in a company that specializes in digital
radio transmission technology. Subsequent to an impairment charge in a prior period, Emmis now
carries this investment at its fair value of $0.2 million.
Although no unrealized or realized gains or losses have been recognized on our
available-for-sale investments, unrealized gains and losses would be reported in other
comprehensive income until realized, at which point they would be recognized in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations. If the Company determines that the value of the investment
is other than temporarily impaired, the Company will recognize, through the statements of
operations, a loss on the investment.
-13-
Table of Contents
Note 2. Share Based Payments
Stock Option Awards
The Company has granted options to purchase its common stock to employees and directors of the
Company under various stock option plans at no less than the fair market value of the underlying
stock on the date of grant. These options are granted for a term not exceeding 10 years and are
forfeited, except in certain circumstances, in the event the employee or director terminates his or
her employment or relationship with the Company. Generally, these options either vest annually
over three years (one-third each year for three years), or cliff vest at the end of three years.
The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of stock options.
The amounts recorded as share based compensation expense primarily relate to stock option and
restricted stock grants, but may also include restricted common stock issued under employment
agreements, common stock issued to employees and directors in lieu of cash payments, and Company
matches of common stock in our 401(k) plan.
The fair value of each option awarded is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Expected
volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. The Company uses
historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model.
The Company includes estimated forfeitures in its compensation cost and updates the estimated
forfeiture rate through the final vesting date of awards. The Company uses the simplified method
to estimate the expected term for all options granted. Although the Company has granted options
for many years, the historical exercise activity of our options was impacted by the way the Company
processed the equitable adjustment of our November 2006 special dividend. Consequently, the
Company believes that reliable data regarding exercise behavior only exists for the period
subsequent to November 2006, which is insufficient experience upon which to estimate the expected
term. However, beginning in fiscal 2013, the Company anticipates having sufficient reliable data
regarding its employees exercise behavior to cease using the simplified method. The risk-free
interest rate for periods within the life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve
in effect at the time of grant. The following assumptions were used to calculate the fair value of
the Companys options on the date of grant during the nine months ended November 30, 2010 and 2011:
Nine Months Ended November 30, | ||||
2010 | 2011 | |||
Risk-Free Interest Rate: |
2% - 2.9% | 1.2% - 2.5% | ||
Expected Dividend Yield: |
0% | 0% | ||
Expected Life (Years): |
6.5 - 6.7 | 6.0 | ||
Expected Volatility: |
98.9% - 101.5% | 110.2% - 111.3% |
-14-
Table of Contents
The following table presents a summary of the Companys stock options outstanding at
November 30, 2011, and stock option activity during the nine months ended November 30, 2011
(Price reflects the weighted average exercise price per share):
Weighted Average | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||
Remaining | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||
Options | Price | Contractual Term | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of period |
8,515,491 | $ | 9.26 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
1,058,536 | 1.02 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised (1) |
10,000 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
38,817 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||||
Expired |
992,844 | 18.10 | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of period |
8,532,366 | 7.26 | 5.4 | $ | 906 | |||||||||||
Exercisable, end of period |
5,044,555 | 11.75 | 3.4 | $ | 115 |
(1) | The Company did not record an income tax benefit related to option exercises in the nine
months ended November 30, 2011. No options were exercised during the nine months ended November 30,
2010. |
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the nine months
ended November 30, 2010 and 2011, was $0.67 and $0.85, respectively.
A summary of the Companys nonvested options at November 30, 2011, and changes during the nine
months ended November 30, 2011, is presented below:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Options | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested, beginning of period |
2,946,661 | $ | 0.50 | |||||
Granted |
1,058,536 | 0.85 | ||||||
Vested |
478,569 | 0.74 | ||||||
Forfeited |
38,817 | 0.67 | ||||||
Nonvested, end of period |
3,487,811 | 0.57 |
There were 3.6 million shares available for future grants under the Companys various
equity plans at November 30, 2011. The vesting dates of outstanding options at November 30, 2011
range from December 2011 to July 2014, and expiration dates range from March 2012 to September
2021.
Restricted Stock Awards
The Company grants restricted stock awards to employees and directors. These awards generally
vest at the end of the second or third year after grant and are forfeited, except in certain
circumstances, in the event the employee terminates his or her employment or relationship with the
Company prior to vesting. Restricted stock award grants prior to fiscal 2011 were granted out of
the Companys 2004 Equity Compensation Plan and restricted stock award grants since March 1, 2010
have been granted out of the Companys 2010 Equity Compensation Plan. The Company may also award,
out of the Companys 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, stock to settle certain bonuses and other
compensation that otherwise would be paid in cash. Any restrictions on these shares are
immediately lapsed on the grant date.
-15-
Table of Contents
The following table presents a summary of the Companys restricted stock grants outstanding at
November 30, 2011, and restricted stock activity during the nine months ended November 30, 2011
(Price reflects the
weighted average share price at the date of grant):
Awards | Price | |||||||
Grants outstanding, beginning of year |
174,956 | $ | 3.37 | |||||
Granted |
17,560 | 1.03 | ||||||
Vested (restriction lapsed) |
166,176 | 3.51 | ||||||
Forfeited |
2,195 | 1.03 | ||||||
Grants outstanding, end of year |
24,145 | 0.90 | ||||||
The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended November
30, 2010 and 2011 was $2.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Recognized Non-Cash Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefits
recognized by the Company in the three and nine months ended November 30, 2010 and 2011:
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended November 30, | Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Station operating expenses |
$ | 89 | $ | 45 | $ | 607 | $ | 173 | ||||||||
Corporate expenses |
198 | 217 | 789 | 604 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating
expenses |
287 | 262 | 1,396 | 777 | ||||||||||||
Tax benefit |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Recognized stock-based compensation expense, net of tax |
$ | 287 | $ | 262 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 777 | ||||||||
As of November 30, 2011, there was $0.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. The cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years.
Note 3. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Valuation of Indefinite-lived Broadcasting Licenses
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill
and Other, the Companys Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses are considered
indefinite-lived intangibles. These assets, which the Company determined were its only
indefinite-lived intangibles, are not subject to amortization, but are tested for impairment at
least annually as discussed below.
The carrying amounts of the Companys FCC licenses were $328.8 million as of February 28, 2011
and $213.0 million as of November 30, 2011. The decline in FCC licenses is attributable to the
sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC as discussed in Note 9. These amounts are
entirely attributable to our radio division. The Company generally performs its annual impairment
test of indefinite-lived intangibles as of December 1 of each year. When indicators of impairment
are present, the Company will perform an interim impairment test. During the quarter ended
November 30, 2011, no new or additional impairment indicators
emerged; hence, no interim impairment testing was warranted. These impairment tests may
result in impairment charges in future periods.
-16-
Table of Contents
Fair value of our FCC licenses is estimated to be the price that would be received to sell an
asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To determine
the fair value of our FCC licenses, the Company uses an income valuation method when it performs
its impairment tests. Under this method, the Company projects cash flows that would be generated
by each of its units of accounting assuming the unit of accounting was commencing operations in its
respective market at the beginning of the valuation period. This cash flow stream is discounted to
arrive at a value for the FCC license. The Company assumes the competitive situation that exists
in each market remains unchanged, with the exception that its unit of accounting commenced
operations at the beginning of the valuation period. In doing so, the Company extracts the value
of going concern and any other assets acquired, and strictly values the FCC license. Major
assumptions involved in this analysis include market revenue, market revenue growth rates, unit of
accounting audience share, unit of accounting revenue share and discount rate. Each of these
assumptions may change in the future based upon changes in general economic conditions, audience
behavior, consummated transactions, and numerous other variables that may be beyond our control.
When evaluating our radio broadcasting licenses for impairment, the testing is performed at the
unit of accounting level as determined by ASC Topic 350-30-35. In our case, radio stations in a
geographic market cluster are considered a single unit of accounting, provided that they are not
being operated under a Local Marketing Agreement by another broadcaster.
Valuation of Goodwill
ASC Topic 350-20-35 requires the Company to test goodwill for impairment at least annually
using a two-step process. The first step is a screen for potential impairment, while the second
step measures the amount of impairment. The Company conducts the two-step impairment test on
December 1 of each fiscal year, unless indications of impairment exist during an interim period.
During the quarter ended November 30, 2011, no new or additional impairment indicators emerged;
hence, no interim impairment testing was warranted. When assessing its goodwill for impairment,
the Company uses an enterprise valuation approach to determine the fair value of each of the
Companys reporting units (radio stations grouped by market and magazines on an individual basis).
Management determines enterprise value for each of its reporting units by multiplying the two-year
average station operating income generated by each reporting unit (current year based on actual
results and the next year based on budgeted results) by an estimated market multiple. The Company
uses a blended station operating income trading multiple of publicly traded radio operators as a
benchmark for the multiple it applies to its radio reporting units. There are no publicly traded
publishing companies that are focused predominantly on city and regional magazines as is our
publishing segment. Therefore, the market multiple used as a benchmark for our publishing
reporting units has been based on recently completed transactions within the city and regional
magazine industry or analyst reports that include valuations of magazine divisions within publicly
traded media conglomerates. Management believes this methodology for valuing radio and publishing
properties is a common approach and believes that the multiples used in the valuation are
reasonable given our peer comparisons and recent market transactions. To corroborate the step-one
reporting unit fair values determined using the market approach described above, management also
uses an income approach, which is a discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of the
reporting unit.
This enterprise valuation is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit for the
first step of the goodwill impairment test. If the reporting unit exhibits impairment, the Company
proceeds to the second step of the goodwill impairment test. For its step-two testing, the
enterprise value is allocated among the tangible assets, indefinite-lived intangible assets (FCC
licenses valued using a direct-method valuation approach) and unrecognized intangible assets, such
as customer lists, with the residual amount representing the implied fair value of the goodwill.
To the extent the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill,
the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in the statement of operations.
As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2011, the carrying amount of the Companys goodwill
was $24.2 million. As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2011 approximately $6.3 million and
$17.9 million of our goodwill was attributable to our radio and publishing divisions, respectively.
-17-
Table of Contents
Definite-lived intangibles
The Companys definite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of foreign broadcasting
licenses, trademarks, and favorable office leases, all of which are amortized over the period of
time the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the Companys future cash
flows. The following table presents the weighted-average useful life, gross carrying amount and
accumulated amortization for each major class of definite-lived intangible assets at February 28,
2011 and November 30, 2011:
February 28, 2011 | November 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining Useful Life | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in years) | Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amount | Amortization | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Broadcasting Licenses |
9.3 | $ | 8,716 | $ | 6,331 | $ | 2,385 | $ | 8,716 | $ | 6,929 | $ | 1,787 | |||||||||||||
Trademarks |
13.3 | 749 | 478 | 271 | 749 | 495 | 254 | |||||||||||||||||||
Favorable Office Leases |
0.8 | 688 | 655 | 33 | 688 | 672 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 10,153 | $ | 7,464 | $ | 2,689 | $ | 10,153 | $ | 8,096 | $ | 2,057 | ||||||||||||||
Total amortization expense from definite-lived intangibles for the threemonth and
nine-month periods ended November 30, 2010 was $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Total
amortization expense from definite-lived intangibles for the three-month and ninemonth periods
ended November 30, 2011 was $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. The following table
presents the Companys estimate of amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal
years for definite-lived intangibles:
YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28 (29), | ||||
2012 |
$ | 690 | ||
2013 |
225 | |||
2014 |
211 | |||
2015 |
209 | |||
2016 |
209 |
In May 2011, Emmis was granted an extension of its broadcasting license in Slovakia,
which now expires in February 2021. Emmis was also awarded an option for an additional eight year
extension. The remaining carrying value of the broadcasting license in Slovakia is being amortized
over the initial eight-year term that expires in February 2021.
Note 4. Liquidity
The Company continually projects its anticipated cash needs, which include its operating
needs, capital needs, principal and interest payments on its indebtedness and preferred stock
dividends. As of the filing of this Form 10-Q, management believes the Company can meet its
liquidity needs through the end of fiscal year 2012 with cash and cash equivalents on hand,
projected cash flows from operations and, to the extent necessary, through its borrowing capacity
under the Credit Agreement, which was approximately $9.4 million at November 30, 2011. Based on
these projections, management also believes the Company will be in compliance with its debt
covenants through the end of fiscal year 2012.
-18-
Table of Contents
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement depend upon our continued compliance with certain
operating covenants and financial ratios. The Company must maintain a minimum amount of trailing
twelve-month
Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and at least $5 million in Liquidity
(as defined in the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement also contains certain other
non-financial covenants. We were in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants as
of November 30, 2011. Our Liquidity (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as of November 30, 2011
was $14.2 million. Our minimum Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement)
requirement and actual amount as of November 30, 2011 was as follows:
As of November 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Actual Trailing | ||||||||
Covenant | Twelve-Month | |||||||
Requirement | Consolidated EBITDA1 | |||||||
Trailing Twelve-month Consolidated EBITDA1 |
$ | 25,000 | $ | 28,893 |
Note 5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As of November 30, 2011, the Company has no outstanding interest rate derivatives. The
discussion below describes the Companys interest rate derivatives that matured during the periods
presented.
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic
risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount,
sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments.
Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate
exposure with the following objectives:
| manage current and forecasted interest rate risk while maintaining optimal financial
flexibility and solvency |
| proactively manage the Companys cost of capital to ensure the Company can effectively
manage operations and execute its business strategy, thereby maintaining a competitive
advantage and enhancing shareholder value |
| comply with covenant requirements in the Companys Credit Agreement |
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives were to add stability to interest
expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the
Company primarily used interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy.
Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts
from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the
agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Under the terms of its Credit
Agreement, the Company was required to fix or cap the interest rate on at least 30% of its debt
outstanding (as defined in the Credit Agreement) for the three-year period ending November 2, 2009.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. The Companys interest rate derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash
flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair
value of the derivatives was recognized directly in earnings. The Company did not
record any hedge ineffectiveness in earnings during the three or nine months ended November
30, 2010 and 2011. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to
derivatives were reclassified to interest expense as interest payments were made on the Companys
variable-rate debt.
1 | As defined in the Credit Agreement |
-19-
Table of Contents
In March 2007, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate exchange agreement (a
Swap), whereby the Company paid a fixed rate of 4.795% on $165 million of notional principal to
Bank of America, and Bank of America paid to the Company a variable rate on the same amount of
notional principal based on the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). This swap
matured in March 2010, at which time the Company recognized a $2.0 million tax benefit that had
previously been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. In March 2008, the Company
entered into an additional three-year Swap, whereby the Company paid a fixed rate of 2.964% on $100
million of notional principal to Deutsche Bank, and Deutsche Bank paid to the Company a variable
rate on the same amount of notional principal based on the three-month LIBOR. In January 2009, the
Company entered into an additional two-year Swap effective as of March 28, 2009, whereby the
Company paid a fixed rate of 1.771% on $75 million of notional principal to Deutsche Bank, and
Deutsche Bank paid to the Company a variable rate on the same amount of notional principal based on
the three-month LIBOR. The two swaps with Deutsche Bank matured in March 2011, at which time the
Company recognized a $0.8 million tax benefit that had previously been recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income.
The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments as
well as their classification on the balance sheet as of February 28, 2011. The accumulated other
comprehensive income balance related to our derivative instruments at February 28, 2011 was $489.
The fair values of the derivative instruments was estimated by obtaining quotations from the
financial institution that were the counterparty to the instruments. The fair value was an
estimate of the net amount that the Company would have been required to pay on February 28, 2011,
if the agreements were transferred to other parties or cancelled by the Company, as further
adjusted by a credit adjustment required by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
discussed below. As discussed above, the derivative instruments matured in March 2011, thus no
amounts related to derivative instruments remain on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
November 30, 2011.
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of February 28, 2011 | As of November 30, 2011 | As of February 28, 2011 | As of November 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | Fair Value | Location | Fair Value | Location | Fair Value | Location | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreements (Current Portion) |
N/A | | N/A | | Other Current Liabilities | 297 | N/A | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
$ | | $ | | $ | 297 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The table below presents the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on
the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended
November 30, 2010 and 2011.
For the Three Months Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain or (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | Derivative (Ineffective | (Ineffective Portion and Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in OCI on Derivative | from Accumulated | Reclassified from Accumulated OCI | Portion and Amount | Excluded from Effectiveness | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow | (Effective Portion) | OCI into Income | into Income (Effective Portion) | Excluded from | Testing) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging Relationships | 2010 | 2011 | (Effective Portion) | 2010 | 2011 | Effectiveness Testing) | 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
$ | (80 | ) | $ | | Interest expense | $ | (922 | ) | $ | | N/A | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (80 | ) | $ | | $ | (922 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||
-20-
Table of Contents
For the Nine Months Ended November 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Gain or (Loss) | (Loss) Reclassified | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | Derivative (Ineffective | (Ineffective Portion and Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in OCI on Derivative | from Accumulated | Reclassified from Accumulated OCI | Portion and Amount | Excluded from Effectiveness | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow | (Effective Portion) | OCI into Income | into Income (Effective Portion) | Excluded from | Testing) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging Relationships | 2010 | 2011 | (Effective Portion) | 2010 | 2011 | Effectiveness Testing) | 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreements |
$ | (475 | ) | $ | | Interest expense | $ | (3,392 | ) | $ | (297 | ) | N/A | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (475 | ) | $ | | $ | (3,392 | ) | $ | (297 | ) | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||||
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company managed its counterparty risk by entering into derivative instruments with global
financial institutions where it believed the risk of credit loss resulting from nonperformance by
the counterparty is low. The Companys counterparties on its interest rate swaps were Deutsche
Bank and Bank of America.
In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company made Credit Value Adjustments (CVAs) to adjust
the valuation of derivatives to account for our own credit risk with respect to all derivative
liability positions. The CVA was accounted for as a decrease to the derivative position with the
corresponding increase or decrease reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. The CVA also accounted for nonperformance risk of our
counterparty in the fair value measurement of all derivative asset positions, when appropriate. As
of February 28, 2011 , the fair value of our derivative instruments was net of less than $0.1
million in CVAs.
The Company did not post any collateral related to the interest rate swap agreements.
Note 6. Fair Value Measurements
As defined in ASC Topic 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the
risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable,
market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. ASC Topic 820
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurement).
-21-
Table of Contents
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Companys
financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2011. The financial assets and liabilities are classified in
their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and
their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
As of November 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
or Liabilities | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||||||
Available for sale securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 189 | $ | 189 | ||||||||
Total assets measured at
fair value on a recurring
basis |
$ | | $ | | $ | 189 | $ | 189 | ||||||||
As of February 28, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
or Liabilities | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||||||
Available for sale securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 189 | $ | 189 | ||||||||
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
$ | | $ | | $ | 189 | $ | 189 | ||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements |
| | 297 | 297 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis |
$ | | $ | | $ | 297 | $ | 297 | ||||||||
Available for sale securities Emmis available for sale security is an investment in
preferred stock of a company that is not traded in active markets. The investment is recorded at
fair value, which is generally estimated using significant unobservable market parameters,
resulting in Level 3 categorization.
Swap agreements Emmis derivative financial instruments consisted solely of interest rate cash
flow hedges in which the Company paid a fixed rate and receives a variable interest rate that was
observable based upon a forward interest rate curve, as adjusted for the CVA discussed in Note 5.
Because a more than insignificant portion of the valuation was based upon unobservable inputs,
these interest rate swaps were considered a Level 3 input.
The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs:
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
November 30, 2010 | November 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Available | Available | |||||||||||||||
For Sale | Derivative | For Sale | Derivative | |||||||||||||
Securities | Instruments | Securities | Instruments | |||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 452 | $ | 4,068 | $ | 189 | $ | 297 | ||||||||
Realized losses included in earnings |
| (3,392 | ) | | (297 | ) | ||||||||||
Changes in other comprehensive income |
| 475 | | | ||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 452 | $ | 1,151 | $ | 189 | $ | | ||||||||
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company has certain assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis under
circumstances and events that include those described in Note 3, Intangible Assets and Goodwill,
and are adjusted to fair value only when the carrying values are more than the fair values. The
categorization of the framework used to price the assets is considered a Level 3, due to the
subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value (see Note 3 for more
discussion).
During the three months and nine months ended November 30, 2011, there were no adjustments to
the fair value of these assets as there were no indicators that would have required interim
testing.
-22-
Table of Contents
Fair Value Of Other Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of financial instruments is determined using the best available
market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary,
however, in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in
a current market exchange, or the value that ultimately will be realized upon maturity or
disposition. The use of different market assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated
fair value amounts.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, including accrued
liabilities: The carrying amount of these assets and liabilities approximates fair value because of
the short maturity of these instruments.
Credit Agreement debt: As of February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2011, the fair value of the
Companys Credit Agreement debt as of those dates was $311.1 million and $201.4 million,
respectively, while the carrying value was $331.0 million and $208.3 million, respectively. The
Companys assessment of the fair value of the Credit Agreement debt is based on bid prices for the
portion of debt that is actively traded. The Extended Term Loans are not actively traded (see Note
10 for more discussion of the Extended Term Loans). The Company believes that the current carrying
value of the Extended Term Loans approximates its fair value.
6.25% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock: As of February 28, 2011 and November
30, 2011, the fair value of the Companys 6.25% Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock
based on quoted market prices was $49.2 million and $17.6 million, respectively, while the carrying
value was $140.5 million and $56.4 million, respectively.
Senior unsecured notes: The senior unsecured notes are not actively traded (see Note 11 for
more discussion of the senior unsecured notes). The Company believes that the current carrying
value of the senior unsecured notes approximates its fair value.
-23-
Table of Contents
Note 7. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) was comprised of the following for the three months and nine
months ended November 30, 2010 and 2011:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
November 30, | November 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated net income |
$ | 2,060 | $ | 58,702 | $ | 2,651 | $ | 53,387 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives |
843 | | 924 | (489 | ) | |||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
1,227 | (573 | ) | (501 | ) | 325 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 4,130 | $ | 58,129 | $ | 3,074 | $ | 53,223 | ||||||||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable
to noncontrolling interests |
(1,475 | ) | (991 | ) | (3,241 | ) | (3,780 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable
to the Company |
$ | 2,655 | $ | 57,138 | $ | (167 | ) | $ | 49,443 | |||||||
Note 8. Segment Information
The Companys operations are aligned into two business segments: (i) Radio and (ii)
Publishing. These business segments are consistent with the Companys management of these
businesses and its financial reporting structure. Corporate expenses are not allocated to
reportable segments. The results of operations of our Hungary radio operations and the operations
related to our Flint Peak Tower Site, both of which had previously been included in the radio
segment, have been classified as discontinued operations and have been excluded from the segment
disclosures below. See Note 1 for more discussion of our discontinued operations.
The Companys segments operate primarily in the United States, but we also operate radio
stations located in Slovakia and Bulgaria. The following table summarizes the net revenues and
long-lived assets of our international properties included in our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Net Revenues | Net Revenues | Long-lived Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | As of February 28, | As of November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2011 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Slovakia |
$ | 2,785 | $ | 2,976 | $ | 9,011 | $ | 8,895 | $ | 7,521 | $ | 6,473 | ||||||||||||
Bulgaria |
288 | 341 | 1,008 | 959 | 778 | 662 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued Operations (see Note 1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hungary |
$ | 10 | $ | | $ | 30 | $ | 7 | $ | 20 | $ | 18 |
The accounting policies as described in the summary of significant accounting policies
included in the Companys Annual Report filed on Form 10-K, for the year ended February 28, 2011,
and in Note 1 to these condensed consolidated financial statements, are applied consistently across
segments.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
November 30, 2011 | Radio | Publishing | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 39,782 | $ | 19,537 | $ | | $ | 59,319 | ||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization |
31,029 | 16,874 | | 47,903 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
| | 4,972 | 4,972 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,225 | 117 | 409 | 1,751 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 7,528 | $ | 2,546 | $ | (5,381 | ) | $ | 4,693 | |||||||
-24-
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
November 30, 2010 | Radio | Publishing | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 47,817 | $ | 18,505 | $ | | $ | 66,322 | ||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization |
32,547 | 16,584 | | 49,131 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization |
| | 3,403 | 3,403 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,867 | 122 | 307 | 2,296 | ||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
3 | | | 3 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 13,400 | $ | 1,799 | $ | (3,710 | ) | $ | 11,489 | |||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
November 30, 2011 | Radio | Publishing | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 135,180 | $ | 49,906 | $ | | $ | 185,086 | ||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization |
101,796 | 47,590 | | 149,386 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization |
| | 15,276 | 15,276 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,670 | 347 | 955 | 5,972 | ||||||||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
790 | 24 | | 814 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 27,924 | $ | 1,945 | $ | (16,231 | ) | $ | 13,638 | |||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
November 30, 2010 | Radio | Publishing | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 143,622 | $ | 49,618 | $ | | $ | 193,240 | ||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization |
102,598 | 46,777 | | 149,375 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization |
| | 13,278 | 13,278 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,677 | 382 | 1,007 | 7,066 | ||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 35,344 | $ | 2,459 | $ | (14,285 | ) | $ | 23,518 | |||||||
As of February 28, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Radio | Publishing | Corporate | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Assets continuing operations |
$ | 404,302 | $ | 38,299 | $ | 26,868 | $ | 469,469 | ||||||||
Assets discontinued operations |
3,008 | | | 3,008 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 407,310 | $ | 38,299 | $ | 26,868 | $ | 472,477 | ||||||||
As of November 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Radio | Publishing | Corporate | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Assets continuing operations |
$ | 298,258 | $ | 37,169 | $ | 28,786 | $ | 364,213 | ||||||||
Assets discontinued operations |
1,493 | | | 1,493 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 299,751 | $ | 37,169 | $ | 28,786 | $ | 365,706 | ||||||||
-25-
Table of Contents
Note 9. Sale of controlling interest in WRXP-FM, WKQX-FM AND WLUP-FM
On September 1, 2011, the Company completed the sale of a controlling interest in Merlin
Media, LLC (Merlin Media), which owns the following radio stations: (i) WKQX-FM, 101.1 MHz,
Channel 266, Chicago, IL (FIN 19525), (ii) WRXP-FM, 101.9 MHz, Channel 270, New York, NY (FIN
67846) and (iii) WLUP-FM, 97.9 MHz, Channel 250, Chicago, IL (FIN 73233) (collectively the Merlin
Stations). The Company received gross cash sale proceeds of $130 million in the transaction, and
incurred approximately $8.6 million of expenses, principally consisting of severance, state and
local taxes, and professional and other fees and expenses. The Company used the net cash proceeds
to repay approximately 38% of the term loans outstanding under its credit facility. Emmis also
paid a $2.0 million exit fee to Canyon related to the repayment of Extended Term Loans on September
1, 2011.
On September 1, 2011, subsidiaries of Emmis entered into the 2nd Amended & Restated Limited
Liability Company Agreement (the LLC Agreement) of Merlin Media, together with Merlin Holdings,
LLC (Merlin Holdings), an affiliate of investment funds managed by GTCR, LLC, and Benjamin L.
Homel (aka Randy Michaels) (together with Merlin Holdings, the Investors).
In connection with the completion of the disposition of assets to Merlin Media and sale of a
controlling interest in Merlin Media pursuant to the Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2011 among
the Company, Merlin Holdings and Mr. Homel (the Purchase Agreement), the Company retained
preferred equity and common equity interests in Merlin Media, the terms of which are governed by
the LLC Agreement. The Companys common equity interests in Merlin Media represent 20.6% of the
initial outstanding common equity interests of Merlin Media and are subject to dilution if the
Company fails to participate pro rata in future capital calls. The fair value of the Companys
20.6% common equity ownership of Merlin Media LLC as of September 1, 2011 was approximately $5.6
million, which is reflected in investments in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets and accounted for under the equity method. The Companys preferred equity interests in
Merlin Media consist of approximately $28.7 million (at par) of non-redeemable perpetual preferred
interests, on which a preferred return accretes quarterly at a rate of 8% per annum. The fair
value of this preferred equity interest as of September 1, 2011, was approximately $10.8 million
and is reflected in investments in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and
accounted for under the cost method. The preferred interests held by the Company are junior to
non-redeemable perpetual preferred interests held by the Investors of approximately $87 million, on
which a preferred return accretes quarterly at a rate of 8% per annum. The preferred interests
held by the Company and the Investors are both junior to a $60 million senior secured note issued
to an affiliate of Merlin Holdings. The note matures five years from closing, and interest accrues
on the note semi-annually at a rate of 15% per annum, payable in cash or in-kind at Merlin Medias
election. Distributions in respect of Merlin Medias common and preferred interests are made when
declared by Merlin Medias board of managers. Given the Companys continued equity interests in
the stations, it is precluded from reclassifying the operating results of the stations to
discontinued operations.
Upon deconsolidation, Emmis recorded the retained common and preferred equity interests at
fair value. The fair value of our investments of Merlin Media LLC was calculated using the Black
Scholes option-pricing model. The models inputs reflect assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the instrument in a current period transaction. Inputs to the model include
stock volatility, dividend yields, expected term of the derivatives and risk-free interest rates.
Results from the valuation model in one period may not be indicative of future period measurements.
Under the LLC Agreement, the Company is entitled initially to appoint one out of five members
of Merlin Medias board of managers and has limited consent rights with respect to specified
transactions. The Company has no obligation to make ongoing capital contributions to Merlin Media,
but as noted above is subject to dilution if it fails to participate pro rata in future capital
calls.
-26-
Table of Contents
Merlin Media is a private company and the Company will have limited ability to sell its
interests in Merlin Media, except pursuant to customary tag-along rights with respect to sales by
Merlin Medias controlling Investor or, after five years, in a private sale to third parties
subject to rights of first offer held by the controlling Investor. The Company has customary
registration rights and is subject to a drag-along right of the controlling Investor.
On September 30, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors
approved a discretionary bonus of $1.7 million to certain employees that were key participants in
the Merlin Media transaction. The discretionary bonus is reflected in corporate expenses,
excluding depreciation and amortization expense during the three-month period ending November 30,
2011.
Note 10. Credit Agreement Amendments
On March 29, 2011, ECC and its principal operating subsidiary, Emmis Operating Company (EOC
and the Borrower) entered into the Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and
Term Loan Agreement (the Third Amendment), by and among the Borrower, ECC, the lending
institutions party to the Credit Agreement and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for
itself and the other lenders party to the Credit Agreement.
Among other things, the Third Amendment provides that (i) the leverage ratio and fixed charge
covenants will not apply to any amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement until November 30,
2012, at which time they will be set at 5.0x and 1.15x for the life of the Credit Agreement and
from November 30, 2011 through August 31, 2012 there will be a minimum Consolidated EBITDA (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) test of $25.0 million per rolling four quarter test period, (ii)
the requirement that annual audits be certified without qualification will be waived for the fiscal
years ending February 2011 and 2012, (iii) the ability of Emmis to engage in certain activities or
transactions, including the payment of dividends, the incurrence of indebtedness and the ability to
invest certain proceeds including from asset sales will be further restricted or prohibited and
(iv) the terms of the existing Tranche B Term Loans held or purchased on or prior to the date of
the Third Amendment by funds or accounts managed by Canyon Capital Advisors LLC (Canyon), are
amended into an amended tranche of term loans with an extended maturity date of November 1, 2014.
The total amount of Tranche B Term Loans outstanding as of March 29, 2011 was $329.0 million, and
the amount of such term loans that Canyon amended into extended term loans was approximately $182.9
million (the Extended Term Loans). The pricing on the Extended Term Loans is based on Emmis
election on the following pricing grid:
Cash Portion | Paid-in-Kind Portion | |
7.50%
|
7.00% | |
7.75% | 6.50% | |
8.00% | 6.00% | |
8.25% | 5.50% | |
8.50% | 5.00% | |
8.75% | 4.50% | |
9.00% | 4.00% | |
9.25% | 3.50% | |
9.50% | 3.00% | |
9.75%1 | 2.50%1 |
1 | If the Company elects 9.75% Cash Portion for any
payment, it may also elect to pay some or the entire Paid-in-Kind portion in
cash for such period. |
-27-
Table of Contents
Prior to the entry into the Third Amendment, Emmis entered into a backstop letter agreement,
dated March 27, 2011, with Canyon (the Backstop Letter Agreement), pursuant to which Canyon
agreed to consent to the Third Amendment and to purchase loans necessary to provide the required
Lenders consent to the Third Amendment. In consideration of Canyons entering into the Backstop
Letter Agreement, Canyon will receive an exit fee of 6% (or 3% during the first six months after
the Third Amendment effective date) on the repayment of Tranche B Term Loans and revolving credit
commitments held or purchased by funds or accounts managed by Canyon as of March 29, 2011. The
Company is accreting the estimated exit fee due to Canyon over the estimated life of the Extended
Term Loans. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2011, accretion of the
exit fee totaled $1.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and is included in the accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations as interest expense. The exit fee liability is
included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent liabilities.
The Third Amendment contains other terms and conditions customary for financing arrangements
of this nature.
Subsequent to the execution of the Third Amendment on March 29, 2011, the maturity dates of
the original term loan and revolver remain unchanged, but the term loans held by Canyon have been
extended to November 1, 2014. The contractual future amortization schedule for the Credit
Agreement subsequent to the execution of the Third Amendment, based upon amounts outstanding at
November 30, 2011 is as follows:
Amortization of | Amortization of | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended | Revolver | Term Loans | Term Loans | Total | ||||||||||||
February 28 (29), | Amortization | Held by Canyon | Held by Others | Amortization | ||||||||||||
2012 |
| 551 | 440 | 991 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
10,000 | 1,093 | 874 | 11,967 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
| 1,081 | 86,783 | 87,864 | ||||||||||||
2015 |
| 107,517 | | 107,517 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,000 | $ | 110,242 | $ | 88,097 | $ | 208,339 | ||||||||
In connection with the Third Amendment, the Company recognized a $1.5 million loss on
debt extinguishment related to the write-off of existing deferred debt issuance costs related to
the Extended Term Loans. The Company incurred approximately $3.4 million of professional fees
associated with the Third Amendment. The Company capitalized approximately $0.4 million of these
costs as debt issuance costs, which are being amortized over the life of the Extended Term Loans.
The remaining $3.0 million of these costs were expensed as a component of corporate expenses in the
nine-month period ended November 30, 2011.
On November 10, 2011, ECC and EOC entered into the Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (the Fourth Amendment), by and among the Borrower, ECC,
the lending institutions party to the Credit Agreement and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent for itself and the other lenders party to the Credit Agreement. The Fourth Amendment did not
change any financial covenants, but amended certain provisions of the Credit Agreement to allow
Emmis to purchase (either for cash or pursuant to total return swaps) its outstanding Series A
cumulative convertible preferred stock with the proceeds of newly issued senior unsecured notes
issued by ECC. See Note 11 for further discussion. In connection with the Fourth Amendment, the
Company paid $1.1 million of fees to its Credit Agreement lenders. These costs were capitalized
and are included in other assets, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and
are being amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Company
incurred approximately $0.3 million of legal fees that were expensed as a component of corporate
expenses in the three months ended November 30, 2011.
-28-
Table of Contents
Note 11. Issuance of ECC Senior Unsecured Notes and Preferred Stock Transactions
During the quarter ended November 30, 2011, Emmis entered into a series of transactions that
enabled it to purchase rights in a significant portion of its outstanding Series A cumulative
convertible preferred stock (Preferred Stock). These transactions are described below.
Issuance of ECC Senior Unsecured Notes
On November 10, 2011, Emmis entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the Note Purchase
Agreement) with Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. (Zell).
Under the Note Purchase Agreement, Zell has agreed to purchase from ECC up to $35.0 million of
unsecured notes (the Notes). The Notes, with respect to distributions upon the liquidation,
winding-up and dissolution of the Company, rank senior to the Preferred Stock and common equity of
the Company, but junior to our Credit Agreement. Emmis is permitted to sell the Notes to Zell on
up to four separate occasions on or before February 2, 2012. The Note Purchase Agreement provides
that Emmis may enter into transactions to purchase or purchase rights in its Preferred Stock
through privately negotiated transactions with individual preferred shareholders and/or through a
tender offer.
Interest on the Notes is paid in kind and compounds quarterly at a rate of 22.95% per annum,
except that during the continuance of any event of default the rate will be 24.95% per annum
payable on demand in cash. The Notes mature on February 1, 2015, at which time the principal
balance and all accreted interest is due entirely in cash.
At any time after the discharge of certain senior obligations of Emmis and its subsidiaries
described in the Note Purchase Agreement, Emmis may, upon prior written notice to Zell, redeem the
Notes in whole or in part at a redemption price (including with certain make-whole amounts for
redemption occurring prior to May 10, 2013) as described in the Note Purchase Agreement. Any
partial redemption of the Notes shall be in denominations of at least $10.0 million and in
multiples of $1.0 million in excess of such minimum denomination.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains representations, warranties, indemnities and affirmative
and negative covenants that are customary for agreements of its type. The negative covenants
include, without limitation, certain limitations on the ability to (1) incur liens and
indebtedness, (2) consummate mergers, consolidations or asset sales, (3) make guarantees and
investments, and (4) pay dividends or distributions on or make any distributions in respect of
Preferred Stock or common equity. The Note Purchase Agreement also includes certain events of
default customary for agreements of its type including, among others, the failure to make payments
when due, insolvency, certain judgments, breaches of representations and warranties, breaches of
covenants, and the occurrence of certain events, including cross acceleration to certain other
indebtedness of Emmis, including its senior credit facility. In addition, Emmis is required to
deliver compliance certificates demonstrating compliance with the Note Purchase Agreement and
Emmis senior credit facility.
Through November 30, 2011, Emmis has issued, on two separate occasions, Notes to Zell totaling
$28.5 million to either purchase or purchase rights in 1,681,429 shares of Preferred Stock at a
weighted average price of $15.56 per share (see discussion below) and to pay $2.3 million in fees
and expenses, $0.2 million of which was capitalized as deferred debt issuance costs. Emmis may
draw additional funds upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including (a) the delivery of a
purchase notice,(2) the correctness of the representations and warranties contained in the Note
Purchase Agreement, (3) the original aggregate principal amount of the Notes issued on the
applicable purchase date, taken together with all other Notes previously purchased shall not exceed
$35.0 million, and (4) the purchaser shall have been registered in the note register and the
purchaser shall have received customary closing deliveries.
-29-
Table of Contents
As of November 30, 2011, subsequent to the issuance of the Notes, outstanding long-term debt
was as follows:
As of February 28, | As of November 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Credit Agreement Debt |
||||||||
Revolver |
$ | 2,000 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Term Loan B |
328,994 | 88,097 | ||||||
Extended Term Loan B |
| 110,242 | ||||||
Total Credit Agreement debt |
330,994 | 208,339 | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes |
| 28,635 | ||||||
Less: current maturities |
(3,290 | ) | (11,983 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 327,704 | $ | 224,991 | ||||
Preferred Stock Transactions
Through November 30, 2011, Emmis either purchased or purchased rights in 1,681,429 shares of
Preferred Stock at a weighted average price of $15.56 per share. We purchased 196,750 shares for
cash and these shares have been retired. The purchase price for the rights in the remaining shares
was also paid in cash, but these shares are subject to total return swap arrangements. We have
entered into confirmations for total return swaps and voting agreements with several preferred
holders, including Alden Global Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. Pursuant to these
agreements and arrangements, we have the ability to direct the vote of 1,484,679 shares of
Preferred Stock, or approximately 57% of the Preferred Stock outstanding as of November 30, 2011.
While these shares of Preferred Stock are not retired for record purposes, they are considered
extinguished for accounting purposes. Accordingly, during the three months ended November 30,
2011, we recorded a gain on extinguishment of preferred stock of $55.8 million, net of transaction
fees and expenses, which is recorded as a decrease to accumulated deficit and included in the
computation of net income available to common shareholders in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements.
The confirmations for the total return swaps are longform confirmations governed by a form of
ISDA 2002 Master Agreement. The swaps, which have a five year term, provide that in return for
payment of the Preferred Stock purchase price described above, we are entitled to receive all
payments and other consideration received by the counterparties from us in respect of the
counterparties Preferred Stock. Therefore, the counterparties will receive no economic benefit by
virtue of their continued record ownership of these shares beyond the purchase price we already
paid. Until settlement of the swaps, the counterparties will continue to hold legal title and have
record ownership of the Preferred Stock, but will be required to vote the Preferred Stock as
directed by the Company pursuant to their respective voting agreements. The swaps will settle by
delivery of each counterpartys Preferred Stock to the Company upon written notice of termination
by the Company (or on any other applicable disruption or termination event).
Note 12. Regulatory, Legal and Other Matters
Certain individuals and groups have challenged applications for renewal of the FCC licenses of
certain of the Companys stations. The challenges to the license renewal applications are
currently pending before the FCC. Emmis does not expect the challenges to result in the denial of
any license renewals.
-30-
Table of Contents
On December 24, 2010, Emmis entered into an agreement with Bose McKinney & Evans, LLP (Bose)
and JS Acquisition LLC for the purpose of coordinating the prosecution of certain litigation (the
Litigation) by JS Acquisition against Alden Global Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, L.P.,
Alden Global Value Recovery Master Fund, L.P., and Alden Media Holdings, LLC (collectively,
Alden) relating to the going private transaction in which Emmis, JS Acquisition and Alden
participated. Under the terms of the agreement, Bose represented both Emmis and JS Acquisition in
connection with the Litigation. Subsequently, Alden sued each of the directors of Emmis in New
York state court alleging breach of fiduciary duty and related claims. Aldens suit against each
of the directors was dismissed on July 14, 2011. In addition, on March 21, 2011, Emmis filed suit
against Alden in Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking recoupment
of approximately $0.3 million of short-swing profits under section 16 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. Also, on November 18, 2011, Emmis filed suit against Joseph R. Siegelbaum, a director
elected by the preferred shareholders in July 2011, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and tortious
interference with prospective business advantage. In connection with the purchase of preferred
stock owned by Alden discussed in Note 11 Alden, Emmis, Joseph R. Siegelbaum and Jeffrey H. Smulyan
entered into a mutual release of any claims existing between (i) Alden, certain affiliated
entities, Joseph R. Siegelbaum and certain other persons, on the one hand, and (ii) Emmis, certain
affiliated entities, Jeffrey H. Smulyan, and certain entities affiliated with Mr. Smulyan, on the
other hand. The mutual release became effective November 28, 2011.
The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management of the Company, there are no legal proceedings pending
against the Company likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Effective December 31, 2009, our radio music license agreements with the two largest
performance rights organizations, American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP)
and Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI), expired. The Radio Music License Committee (RMLC), which
negotiates music licensing fees for most of the radio industry with ASCAP and BMI and of which we
are a participant, filed motions in the U.S. District Court in New York against BMI and ASCAP on
behalf of the radio industry, seeking interim fees and a determination of fair and reasonable
industry-wide license fees. The U.S. District Court in New York approved reduced interim fees for
ASCAP and BMI. The final fees, still to be determined by the court, may be retroactive to January
1, 2010 and may be different from the interim fees.
Note 13. Subsequent Event
On December 1, 2011, Emmis launched a modified Dutch auction tender offer to purchase up to
$6.0 million in cash of its Preferred Stock at a price per share not less than $14.00 and not
greater than $15.56. Pursuant to the tender offer, Emmis purchased 164,400 shares of its Preferred
Stock at $15.56 per share. The total purchase price of $2.9 million, including $0.3 million of
fees and expenses, was funded through additional ECC senior unsecured Notes, bringing the total
amount of such notes issued to date to $31.4 million out of a maximum amount of $35.0 million.
After payment for the tendered Preferred Stock on January 5, 2012, there are 2,448,020 shares of
Preferred Stock outstanding.
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Note: Certain statements included in this report or in the financial statements contained herein
which are not statements of historical fact, including but not limited to those identified with the
words expect, should, will or look are intended to be, and are, by this Note, identified as
forward-looking statements, as defined in the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any
future result, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward-looking statement.
Such factors include, among others:
| general economic and business conditions; |
||
| fluctuations in the demand for advertising and demand for different types of advertising
media; |
||
| our ability to service our outstanding debt; |
-31-
Table of Contents
| loss of key personnel; |
||
| increased competition in our markets and the broadcasting industry; |
||
| our ability to attract and secure programming, on-air talent, writers and photographers; |
||
| inability to obtain (or to obtain timely) necessary approvals for purchase or sale
transactions or to complete the transactions for other reasons generally beyond our
control; |
||
| increases in the costs of programming, including on-air talent; |
||
| new or changing regulations of the Federal Communications Commission or other
governmental agencies; |
||
| changes in radio audience measurement methodologies; |
||
| competition from new or different technologies; |
||
| war, terrorist acts or political instability; and |
||
| other factors mentioned in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. |
For a more detailed discussion of these and other risk factors, see the Risk Factors section of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended February 28, 2011. Emmis does not undertake any
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements because of new information,
future events or otherwise.
GENERAL
We are a diversified media company. We own and operate radio and publishing properties
located primarily in the United States. Our revenues are mostly affected by the advertising rates
our entities charge, as advertising sales represent approximately 70% of our consolidated revenues.
These rates are in large part based on our entities ability to attract audiences/subscribers in
demographic groups targeted by their advertisers. Arbitron Inc. generally measures radio station
ratings in our domestic markets on a weekly basis using a passive digital system of measuring
listening (the Portable People MeterTM). Because audience ratings in a
stations local market are critical to the stations financial success, our strategy is to use
market research and advertising and promotion to attract and retain audiences in each stations
chosen demographic target group.
Our revenues vary throughout the year. As is typical in the broadcasting industry, our
revenues and operating income are usually lowest in our fourth fiscal quarter.
In addition to the sale of advertising time for cash, stations typically exchange advertising
time for goods or services, which can be used by the station in its business operations. These
barter transactions are recorded at the estimated fair value of the product or service received.
We generally confine the use of such trade transactions to promotional items or services for which
we would otherwise have paid cash. In addition, it is our general policy not to pre-empt
advertising spots paid for in cash with advertising spots paid for in trade.
-32-
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the sources of our revenues for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2011. All revenues generated by our international radio
properties are included in the Local category. The category Non Traditional principally
consists of ticket sales and sponsorships of events our stations and magazines conduct in their
local markets. The category Other includes, among other items, revenues generated by the
websites of our entities and barter.
Three Months Ended November 30, | Nine Months Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | % of Total | 2011 | % of Total | 2010 | % of Total | 2011 | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Local |
$ | 35,868 | 54.1 | % | $ | 30,645 | 51.7 | % | $ | 108,109 | 55.9 | % | $ | 98,996 | 53.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
National |
11,534 | 17.4 | % | 10,266 | 17.3 | % | 29,267 | 15.1 | % | 28,307 | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Political |
1,003 | 1.5 | % | 175 | 0.3 | % | 1,600 | 0.8 | % | 526 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Sales |
3,729 | 5.6 | % | 3,819 | 6.4 | % | 9,989 | 5.2 | % | 9,889 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non Traditional |
3,268 | 4.9 | % | 3,585 | 6.0 | % | 14,651 | 7.6 | % | 15,589 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
10,920 | 16.5 | % | 10,829 | 18.3 | % | 29,624 | 15.4 | % | 31,779 | 17.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 66,322 | $ | 59,319 | $ | 193,240 | $ | 185,086 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As previously mentioned, we derive approximately 70% of our net revenues from advertising
sales. Our radio stations derive a higher percentage of their advertising revenues from local
sales than our publishing entities. In the nine-month period ended November 30, 2011, local sales,
excluding political revenues, represented approximately 82% and 63% of our advertising revenues for
our radio and publishing divisions, respectively.
No customer represents more than 10% of our consolidated net revenues. Our top ten categories
for radio represent approximately 59% and 61% of our radio divisions total advertising net
revenues for the nine-month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively. The automotive
industry, representing approximately 10% of our radio net revenues, is the largest category for our
radio division for the nine-month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively.
The majority of our expenses are fixed in nature, principally consisting of salaries and
related employee benefit costs, office and tower rent, utilities, property and casualty insurance
and programming-related expenses. However, approximately 20% of our expenses vary in connection
with changes in revenues. These variable expenses primarily relate to sales commissions and bad
debt reserves. In addition, costs related to our marketing and promotions department are highly
discretionary and incurred primarily to maintain and/or increase our audience and market share.
KNOWN TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES
Although advertising revenues are on an upswing following the recent global recession,
domestic radio revenue growth has been challenged for several years. Management believes this is
principally the result of three factors: (1) the proliferation of advertising inventory caused by
the emergence of new media, such as various media distributed via the Internet, telecommunication
companies and cable interconnects, as well as social networks and social coupon sites, all of which
are gaining advertising share against radio and other traditional media, (2) the perception of
investors and advertisers that satellite radio and portable media players diminish the
effectiveness of radio advertising, and (3) the adoption of a new method of gathering ratings data,
which has shown an increase in cumulative audience size, but a decrease in time spent listening as
compared to the previous method of gathering ratings data.
The Company and the radio industry have begun several initiatives to address these issues.
The radio industry is working aggressively to increase the number of portable digital media devices
that contain an FM tuner, including smartphones and music players. In many countries, FM tuners
are common features in portable digital media devices. The radio industry is working with leading
United States network providers, device manufacturers, regulators and legislators to ensure that FM
tuners are included in future portable digital media devices. Including FM as a feature on these
devices has the potential to increase radio listening and improve perception of the radio industry
while offering network providers the benefits of a proven emergency notification system, reduced
network congestion from audio streaming services, and a host of new revenue generating
applications.
-33-
Table of Contents
The Company has also aggressively worked to harness the power of broadband and mobile media
distribution in the development of emerging business opportunities by becoming one of the fifteen
largest streaming audio providers in the United States, developing highly interactive websites with
content that engages our listeners, using SMS texting and delivering real-time traffic to
navigation devices.
Along with the rest of the radio industry, the majority of our stations have deployed HD
Radio®. HD Radio® offers listeners advantages over standard analog
broadcasts, including improved sound quality and additional digital channels. To make the rollout
of HD Radio® more efficient, a consortium of broadcasters representing a majority of
the radio stations in nearly all of our markets have agreed to work together in each radio market
to ensure the most diverse consumer offering possible and to accelerate the rollout of HD
Radio® receivers, particularly in automobiles. In addition to offering secondary
channels, the HD Radio® spectrum allows broadcasters to transmit other forms of data.
We are participating in a joint venture with other broadcasters to provide the bandwidth that a
third party uses to transmit location-based data to hand-held and in-car navigation devices. It is
unclear what impact HD Radio® will have on the markets in which we operate.
Arbitron Inc., the supplier of ratings data for United States radio markets, has developed
technology to passively collect data for its ratings service. The Portable People
MeterTM (PPMTM) is a small, pager-sized device that does not
require any active manipulation by the end user and is capable of automatically measuring radio,
television, Internet, satellite radio and satellite television signals that are encoded for the
service by the broadcaster. The PPMTM offers a number of advantages over the
traditional diary ratings collection system including ease of use, more reliable ratings data and
shorter time periods between when advertising runs and when audience listening or viewing habits
can be reported. This service began in the New York and Los Angeles markets in October 2008, in
the St. Louis market in October 2009, and the Austin and Indianapolis markets in the fall of 2010.
In each market in which the service has launched, there has been a compression in the relative
ratings of all stations in the market, increasing the competitive pressure within the market for
advertising dollars. In addition, ratings for certain stations when measured by the
PPMTM as opposed to the traditional diary methodology can be materially different.
The results of our domestic radio operations are heavily dependent on the results of our New
York and Los Angeles markets. These markets account for approximately 45% of our domestic radio
net revenues. As discussed below, during the three-month period ended November 30, 2011, both
KPWR-FM in Los Angeles and our New York radio cluster trailed the performance of the markets in
which they operate.
KPWR-FM in Los Angeles trailed the overall Los Angeles radio market during the three-month
period ended November 30, 2011. For the three-month period ended November 30, 2011, KPWR-FMs
gross revenues were down 4.1%, whereas Miller Kaplan reported that Los Angeles radio market total
gross revenues were down 3.8% versus the same period of the prior year.
Our radio cluster in New York trailed the performance of the overall New York radio market
during the three-month period ended November 30, 2011. For the three-month period ended November
30, 2011, our New York radio stations gross revenues were down 15.2%, whereas Miller Kaplan
reported that New York radio market total gross revenues were down 1.7% versus the same period of
the prior year. Our adult urban station, WRKS-FM, was particularly weak during the quarter. We
have made certain programming changes and have increased promotional spending for the station in an
attempt to improve its ratings position.
-34-
Table of Contents
As part of our business strategy, we continually evaluate potential acquisitions of radio
stations, publishing properties and other businesses that we believe hold promise for long-term
appreciation in value and leverage our strengths. However, Emmis Operating Companys (the
Companys principal operating subsidiary, EOC) Credit Agreement substantially limits our ability
to make acquisitions. We also regularly review our portfolio of assets and may opportunistically
dispose of assets when we believe it is appropriate to do so. See Note 9 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the sale of one of our radio stations in New
York and our two radio stations in Chicago.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that encompass significant judgments and
uncertainties, and potentially lead to materially different results under different assumptions and
conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are those described below.
Revenue Recognition
Broadcasting revenue is recognized as advertisements are aired. Publication revenue is
recognized in the month of delivery of the publication. Both broadcasting revenue and publication
revenue recognition is subject to meeting certain conditions such as persuasive evidence that an
arrangement exists and collection is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally met at the
time the advertisement is aired for broadcasting revenue and upon delivery of the publication for
publication revenue. Advertising revenues presented in the financial statements are reflected on a
net basis, after the deduction of advertising agency fees, usually at a rate of 15% of gross
revenues.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on managements judgment of the
collectability of receivables. When assessing the collectability of receivables, management
considers, among other things, historical loss experience and existing economic conditions.
FCC Licenses and Goodwill
We have made acquisitions in the past for which a significant amount of the purchase price was
allocated to FCC licenses and goodwill assets. As of November 30, 2011, we have recorded
approximately $237.2 in goodwill and FCC licenses, which represents approximately 65% of our total
assets.
In the case of our U.S. radio stations, we would not be able to operate the properties without
the related FCC license for each property. FCC licenses are renewed every eight years;
consequently, we continually monitor our stations compliance with the various regulatory
requirements. Historically, all of our FCC licenses have been renewed at the end of their
respective periods, and we expect that all FCC licenses will continue to be renewed in the future.
We consider our FCC licenses to be indefinite-lived intangibles. Our foreign broadcasting
licenses expire during periods ranging from February 2021 to February 2026. While all of our
international broadcasting licenses were recently extended, we will need to submit extension
applications upon their expiration to continue our broadcast operations in these countries. While
there is a general expectancy of renewal of radio broadcast licenses in most countries and we
expect to actively seek renewal of our foreign licenses, both of the countries in which we operate
do not have the regulatory framework or history that we have with respect to license renewals in
the United States. This makes the risk of non-renewal (or of renewal on less favorable terms) of
foreign licenses greater than for United States licenses. We treat our foreign broadcasting
licenses as definite-lived intangibles and amortize them over their respective license periods.
-35-
Table of Contents
We do not amortize goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets, but rather test for
impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an asset
may be impaired. When evaluating our radio broadcasting licenses for impairment, the testing is
performed at the unit of accounting level as determined by Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Topic 350-30-35. In our case, radio stations in a geographic market cluster are considered
a single unit of accounting, provided that they are not being operated under a Local Marketing
Agreement by another broadcaster.
We complete our annual impairment tests on December 1 of each year and perform additional
interim impairment testing whenever triggering events suggest such testing is warranted.
Valuation of Indefinite-lived Broadcasting Licenses
Fair value of our FCC licenses is estimated to be the price that would be received to sell an
asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To determine
the fair value of our FCC licenses, the Company uses an income valuation method when it performs
its impairment tests. Under this method, the Company projects cash flows that would be generated
by each of its units of accounting assuming the unit of accounting was commencing operations in its
respective market at the beginning of the valuation period. This cash flow stream is discounted to
arrive at a value for the FCC license. The Company assumes the competitive situation that exists
in each market remains unchanged, with the exception that its unit of accounting commenced
operations at the beginning of the valuation period. In doing so, the Company extracts the value
of going concern and any other assets acquired, and strictly values the FCC license. Major
assumptions involved in this analysis include market revenue, market revenue growth rates, unit of
accounting audience share, unit of accounting revenue share and discount rate. Each of these
assumptions may change in the future based upon changes in general economic conditions, audience
behavior, consummated transactions, and numerous other variables that may be beyond our control.
Valuation of Goodwill
ASC Topic 350 requires the Company to test goodwill for impairment at least annually using a
two-step process. The first step is a screen for potential impairment, while the second step
measures the amount of impairment. The Company conducts the two-step impairment test on December 1
of each fiscal year, unless indications of impairment exist during an interim period. When
assessing its goodwill for impairment, the Company uses an enterprise valuation approach to
determine the fair value of each of the Companys reporting units (radio stations grouped by market
and magazines on an individual basis). Management determines enterprise value for each of its
reporting units by multiplying the two-year average station operating income generated by each
reporting unit (current year based on actual results and the next year based on budgeted results)
by an estimated market multiple. The Company uses a blended station operating income trading
multiple of publicly traded radio operators as a benchmark for the multiple it applies to its radio
reporting units. There are no publicly traded publishing companies that are focused predominantly
on city and regional magazines as is our publishing segment. Therefore, the market multiple used
as a benchmark for our publishing reporting units is based on recently completed transactions
within the city and regional magazine industry or analyst reports that include valuations of
magazine divisions within publicly traded media conglomerates. Management believes this
methodology for valuing radio and publishing properties is a common approach and believes that the
multiples used in the valuation are reasonable given our peer comparisons and recent market
transactions. To corroborate the step-one reporting unit fair values determined using the market
approach described above, management also uses an income approach, which is a discounted cash flow
method to determine the fair value of the reporting unit.
This enterprise valuation is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit for the
first step of the goodwill impairment test. If the reporting unit exhibits impairment, the Company
proceeds to the second step of the goodwill impairment test. For its step-two testing, the
enterprise value is allocated among the tangible assets, indefinite-lived intangible assets (FCC
licenses valued using a direct-method valuation approach) and unrecognized intangible assets, such
as customer lists, with the residual amount representing the implied fair value of the goodwill.
To the extent the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill,
the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in the statement of operations.
-36-
Table of Contents
Deferred Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequence of
events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or income tax returns.
Income taxes are recognized during the year in which the underlying transactions are reflected in
the consolidated statements of operations. Deferred taxes are provided for temporary differences
between amounts of assets and liabilities as recorded for financial reporting purposes and amounts
recorded for income tax purposes. After determining the total amount of deferred tax assets, the
Company determines whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. If the Company determines that a deferred tax asset is not likely to be
realized, a valuation allowance will be established against that asset to record it at its expected
realizable value.
Estimate of Effective Tax Rates
We estimate the effective tax rates and associated liabilities or assets for each legal entity
within Emmis. These estimates are based upon our interpretation of United States and local tax
laws as they apply to our legal entities and our overall tax structure. Audits by local tax
jurisdictions, including the United States Government, could yield different interpretations from
our own and cause the Company to owe more taxes than originally recorded. We utilize advisors in
the various tax jurisdictions to evaluate our position and to assist in our calculation of our tax
expense and related assets and liabilities.
Results of Operations for the Three-month and Nine-Month Periods Ended November 30, 2011, Compared
to November 30, 2010
Net revenues:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 47,817 | $ | 39,782 | $ | (8,035 | ) | (16.8 | )% | $ | 143,622 | $ | 135,180 | $ | (8,442 | ) | (5.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Publishing |
18,505 | 19,537 | 1,032 | 5.6 | % | 49,618 | 49,906 | 288 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 66,322 | $ | 59,319 | $ | (7,003 | ) | (10.6 | )% | $ | 193,240 | $ | 185,086 | $ | (8,154 | ) | (4.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Radio net revenues decreased in the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30,
2011 as compared to the same period of the prior year principally due to the July 15, 2011
commencement of a Local Marketing Agreement (LMA) related to the Merlin Stations and the ultimate
sale of a controlling interest in these stations on September 1, 2011. During the time these
stations were operated pursuant to the LMA, Emmis recorded, as net revenue, a $0.3 million monthly
LMA fee, but did not record advertising sales during this period. We typically monitor the
performance of our domestic stations against the aggregate performance of the markets in which we
operate based on reports for the periods prepared by Miller Kaplan. Miller Kaplan reports are
generally prepared on a gross revenues basis and exclude revenues from barter arrangements. Miller
Kaplan reported gross revenues for our domestic radio markets decreased 1.8% and increased 0.8% for
the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2011 as compared to the same periods of
the prior year. Excluding the Merlin Stations, our gross revenues as reported to Miller Kaplan
decreased 4.9% and increased 0.9% for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30,
2011 as compared to the same periods prior year. For the three-month period ending November 30,
2011, our gross revenues exceeded the market average in Indianapolis, but trailed market
performance in all other markets measured by Miller Kaplan. For the nine-month period ending
November 30, 2011, our gross revenues exceeded the market growth rate in Indianapolis and Los
Angeles, but trailed the market growth rate in New York, St. Louis and Austin. Miller Kaplan does
not report gross revenue market data for our Terre Haute market.
During the three months ended November 30, 2011, more
advertisers targeted adult consumers at the expense of younger
demographics. Since our portfolio of stations predominantly
serves 18-34 year-old consumers, this shift in advertising
adversely impacted us. Furthermore, we experienced a significant drop
in movie advertising, a category that is historically among our top
ten. For the nine-month period ended
November 30, 2011 as compared to the same period of the prior year, our average rate per minute for
our domestic radio stations was up 3.6%, and our minutes sold were down 3.1%.
-37-
Table of Contents
Publishing net revenues increased in the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30,
2011 as compared to the same periods of the prior year as the local advertising environment, which
had been stagnant for much of the year, began to improve in our fiscal third quarter.
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 32,547 | $ | 31,029 | $ | (1,518 | ) | (4.7 | )% | $ | 102,598 | $ | 101,796 | $ | (802 | ) | (0.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Publishing |
16,584 | 16,874 | 290 | 1.7 | % | 46,777 | 47,590 | 813 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 49,131 | $ | 47,903 | $ | (1,228 | ) | (2.5 | )% | $ | 149,375 | $ | 149,386 | $ | 11 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2011 were down approximately $1.5 million and
$0.8 million, respectively, for our radio division. The decrease in station operating expenses is
principally due to the LMA and sale of the Merlin Stations.
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, for publishing
for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 30, 2011 were both up 1.7% over the prior
year.
Corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses excluding
depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 3,403 | $ | 4,972 | $ | 1,569 | 46.1 | % | $ | 13,278 | $ | 15,276 | $ | 1,998 | 15.0 | % |
During the three-month period ending November 30, 2011, the Company paid a $1.7 million
bonus to certain employees in connection with the sale of the Merlin Stations. We also incurred
approximately $0.3 million of professional fees associated with the Fourth Amendment to our Credit
Agreement as discussed in Note 11 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
During the three months ended November 30, 2010, we incurred $0.7 related to performance incentives
earned during the quarter. No such incentives were earned during the three months ended November
30, 2011.
In addition to the items described above, during the nine-month period ended November 30,
2010, the Company incurred approximately $3.1 million of expenses related to a going private
transaction. During the nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company incurred approximately
$3.0 million of costs associated with the Third Amendment discussed in Note 10 to the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements and approximately $0.7 million for a discretionary
bonus paid to substantially all corporate employees.
-38-
Table of Contents
Depreciation and amortization:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 1,867 | $ | 1,225 | $ | (642 | ) | (34.4 | )% | $ | 5,677 | $ | 4,670 | $ | (1,007 | ) | (17.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Publishing |
122 | 117 | (5 | ) | (4.1 | )% | 382 | 347 | (35 | ) | (9.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
307 | 409 | 102 | 33.2 | % | 1,007 | 955 | (52 | ) | (5.2 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 2,296 | $ | 1,751 | $ | (545 | ) | (23.7 | )% | $ | 7,066 | $ | 5,972 | $ | (1,094 | ) | (15.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||
The decrease in depreciation expense for the three-month and nine-month periods ended
November 30, 2011 is mostly attributable to certain assets becoming fully depreciated; thus the
Company has ceased to record depreciation expense on those assets. Also, property and equipment of
the Merlin stations has been sold and is no longer being depreciated and our license in Slovakia
was extended by an additional eight years and is now being amortized through February 2021.
Loss on sale of assets:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 3 | $ | | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | 790 | $ | 787 | |||||||||||
Publishing |
| | | | 24 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loss on sale of assets: |
$ | 3 | $ | | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | 814 | $ | 811 | |||||||||||
In July 2011, Emmis sold its office building in Terre Haute, Indiana for $0.2 million and
recorded a loss on sale of assets of $0.8 million.
Operating income (loss):
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income
(loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Radio |
$ | 13,400 | $ | 7,528 | $ | (5,872 | ) | (43.8 | )% | $ | 35,344 | $ | 27,924 | $ | (7,420 | ) | (21.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Publishing |
1,799 | 2,546 | 747 | 41.5 | % | 2,459 | 1,945 | (514 | ) | (20.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(3,710 | ) | (5,381 | ) | (1,671 | ) | (45.0 | )% | (14,285 | ) | (16,231 | ) | (1,946 | ) | (13.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating income: |
$ | 11,489 | $ | 4,693 | $ | (6,796 | ) | (59.2 | )% | $ | 23,518 | $ | 13,638 | $ | (9,880 | ) | (42.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Radio operating income decreased in the three-month and nine-month periods ended November
30, 2011 mostly due to the commencement of the LMA and sale of the Merlin Stations and related
severance and transactions costs as described above.
Publishing operating income increased in the three-month period ended November 30, 2011 due to
stronger local advertising demand, but is still down for the nine-month period ended November 30,
2011 as growth of operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, while
minimal, has outpaced net revenue growth.
Corporate operating losses varied during the three-month and nine-month periods ended November
30, 2011 predominately due to significant transaction-related costs in all periods as described
above.
-39-
Table of Contents
Interest expense:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 5,195 | $ | 6,257 | $ | 1,062 | 20.4 | % | $ | 16,084 | $ | 21,681 | $ | 5,597 | 34.8 | % |
Although the Company repaid approximately $121.4 million of Credit Agreement debt in
connection with the sale of its controlling interest of Merlin Media LLC, interest expense
increased during the three-month and nine-month periods by $1.1 million and $5.6 million,
respectively. The increase in interest expense for both the three-month and nine-month periods
ended November 30, 2011 is mostly due to the Third Amendment to our Credit Agreement, which was
effective March 29, 2011. Subsequent to the Third Amendment, the interest rate on our Credit
Agreement debt held by Canyon, which as of November 30, 2011 was $110.2 million, changed from LIBOR
+ 4% to a minimum of 12.25% per annum. Also in accordance with the Third Amendment, the Company
now pays an exit fee upon repayment of a portion of our term loans ranging from 3% to 6% of the
balance repaid. The Company is accruing this exit fee over the term of the Extended Term Loans as
a component of interest expense.
Loss on debt extinguishment:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on debt
extinguishment |
$ | | $ | 525 | $ | 525 | $ | | $ | 2,003 | $ | 2,003 |
During the three-month period ended November 30, 2011, the Company recorded a loss on
debt extinguishment of $0.5 million related to the write-off of debt fees associated with term
loans repaid during the quarter. The loss on debt extinguishment for the nine-month period ended
November 30, 2011 includes a $1.5 million loss on debt extinguishment as a portion of our term
loans were deemed to be substantially modified in connection with the Third Amendment.
Gain on sale of controlling interest Merlin Media LLC:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of
controlling
interest
in Merlin Media LLC |
$ | | $ | 31,805 | $ | 31,805 | $ | | $ | 31,805 | $ | 31,805 |
On September 1, 2011, the Company sold a controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC for
$130 million in cash proceeds. Additionally, the Company retained a preferred and common equity
interest in Merlin Media LLC. The gain on sale of controlling interest was measured as the
aggregate of cash received and the fair value of the retained noncontrolling interests in Merlin
Media LLC, less the Companys carrying value of the assets and liabilities sold.
-40-
Table of Contents
Provision for income taxes:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit)
for income taxes |
$ | 4,068 | $ | (27,477 | ) | $ | (31,545 | ) | $ | 4,316 | $ | (26,987 | ) | $ | (31,303 | ) |
The benefit for income taxes for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November
30, 2011, principally relates to the utilization of previously reserved net operating losses and
the elimination of the portion of the Companys deferred tax liability attributable to
indefinite-lived intangibles associated with the sale of the Merlin Stations.
The Company is recording a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets, including its
net operating loss carryforwards, but excluding deferred tax liabilities related to
indefinite-lived intangibles.
(Gain) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss from
discontinued
operations, net of tax |
$ | 34 | $ | (1,903 | ) | $ | (1,937 | ) | $ | 229 | $ | (4,693 | ) | $ | (4,922 | ) |
Our Hungarian radio operations and the operations of our Flint Peak Tower Site have been
classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements. The
increase in income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the nine months ended November 30,
2011 mostly relates to the gain on sale of the Flint Peak Tower Site. The gain reflected in the
three months ended November 30, 2011 mostly relates to the reclassification of tax expense
previously shown in discontinued operations that is no longer applicable since we now have pre-tax
income from continuing operations.
Consolidated net income:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net
income |
$ | 2,060 | $ | 58,702 | $ | 56,642 | $ | 2,651 | $ | 53,387 | $ | 50,736 |
Consolidated net income increased between periods mostly due to the gain on sale of the
Merlin Stations, including the benefit for income taxes, both of which are described above.
Gain on extinguishment of preferred stock:
For the three months ended November 30, | For the nine months ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | $ Change | 2010 | 2011 | $ Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(As reported, amounts in thousands) | (As reported, amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on
extinguishment of
preferred stock |
$ | | $ | 55,835 | $ | 55,835 | $ | | $ | 55,835 | $ | 55,835 |
-41-
Table of Contents
During the three-month period ended November 30, 2011, the Company purchased or purchased
rights in 1,681,429 shares of its preferred stock for $28.3 million. Preferred stock is carried on
the balance sheet at its liquidation preference of $50 per share. The shares that Emmis purchased
rights in are considered retired from an accounting perspective, and thus Emmis recognized a gain
on extinguishment of the preferred stock equal to the difference of the acquisition price and the
carrying amount of the preferred stock.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and cash available through
revolver borrowings under our credit facility. Our primary uses of capital during the past few
years have been, and are expected to continue to be, capital expenditures, working capital, debt
service requirements and the repayment of debt.
At November 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $9.9 million and net working capital
of $7.6 million. At February 28, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $6.1 million and net
working capital of $12.1 million. Cash and cash equivalents held at various European banking
institutions at February 28, 2011 and November 30, 2011 was $5.8 million and $5.2 million (which
includes approximately $1.1 million of cash related to our Slager discontinued operation which is
classified as current assets discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets), respectively. Our ability to access our share of these international cash balances (net
of noncontrolling interests) is limited by country-specific statutory requirements.
During the nine months ended November 30, 2011, the Company sold its 50% share of a
partnership in which the sole asset is land in New Jersey on which a transmission tower is located
to the other partner for $1.3 million in cash. Prior to its sale, the carrying value of this
investment was $1.2 million and was shown in other assets, net on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Proceeds from the sale were used to repay amounts outstanding under our senior
credit facility.
On September 1, 2011, the Company completed the disposition of a controlling interest in
Merlin Media, LLC (Merlin Media), which owns the following radio stations: (i) WKQX-FM, 101.1
MHz, Channel 266, Chicago, IL (FIN 19525), (ii) WRXP-FM, 101.9 MHz, Channel 270, New York, NY (FIN
67846) and (iii) WLUP-FM, 97.9 MHz, Channel 250, Chicago, IL (FIN 73233). The sale was made
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, initially disclosed on the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 21, 2011 (as amended by a Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the
Commission on June 24, 2011). The Company received gross cash sale proceeds of $130 million in the
transaction, and incurred approximately $8.6 million of expenses, principally consisting of
severance, state and local taxes, and professional and other fees and expenses. The Company used
the net cash proceeds to repay approximately 38% of the term loans outstanding under its credit
facility. Emmis also paid a $2.0 million exit fee to Canyon related to the repayment of Extended
Term Loans on September 1, 2011.
On September 30, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors approved
a discretionary bonus of $1.7 million to certain employees that were key participants in the Merlin
Media transaction. The discretionary bonus is reflected in corporate expenses, excluding
depreciation and amortization expense in the three-month period ending November 30, 2011.
On various dates in November 2011, the Company issued senior unsecured notes to Zell Credit
Opportunities Master Fund L.P. (Zell) totaling $28.5 million. Cash proceeds from the notes were
used to either purchase or purchase rights in 1,681,421 shares of the Companys preferred stock and
to pay fees and expenses. Pursuant to the Notes Purchase Agreement between the Company and Zell,
the Company may issue additional notes, but the aggregate total of all notes issued cannot exceed
$35.0 million.
-42-
Table of Contents
On December 1, 2011, Emmis launched a modified Dutch auction tender offer to purchase up to
$6.0 million in cash of its Preferred Stock at a price per share not less than $14.00 and not
greater than $15.56. Pursuant to the tender offer, Emmis purchased 164,400 shares of its Preferred
Stock at $15.56 per share. The total purchase price of $2.9 million, including $0.3 million of
fees and expenses, was funded through additional ECC senior unsecured Notes, bringing the total
amount of such notes issued to date to $31.4 million out of a maximum amount of $35.0 million.
In recent years, the Company has recorded significant impairment charges, mostly attributable
to our FCC licenses. These impairment charges have had no impact on our liquidity or compliance
with debt covenants.
Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $0.3 million for the nine-month period ended November
30, 2011 versus cash provided by operating activities of $7.8 million in the same period of the
prior year. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities is mostly due to the increase in
interest costs as a result of higher interest rates associated with the Third Amendment as
previously discussed, transaction costs associated with the sale of a controlling interest in
Merlin Media LLC as previously discussed and a decrease in cash provided by our discontinued
operations.
Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities was $133.7 million for the nine-month period ended
November 30, 2011 versus cash used in investing activities of $2.5 million in the same period
of the prior year. During the nine-month period ended November 30, 2011, the Company sold a
controlling interest in the Merlin Stations for $130.0 million in cash, sold its Flint Peak Tower
Site for $5.8 million of net cash proceeds and sold its 50% share of a partnership in which the
sole asset is land in New Jersey on which a transmission tower is located to the other partner for
$1.3 million of net cash proceeds. The proceeds related to the Flint Peak Tower sale are
classified as cash provided by discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of cash flows. Partially offsetting the net cash proceeds on the sales described above
was approximately $3.3 million of capital expenditures. In the prior year, the only substantial
use of cash was for $2.4 million of capital expenditures. Investing activities generally include
capital expenditures and business acquisitions and dispositions.
We expect capital expenditures related to continuing operations to be approximately $6.8
million in the current fiscal year, compared to $4.2 million in fiscal 2011. We expect that future
requirements for capital expenditures will include capital expenditures incurred during the
ordinary course of business. We expect to fund such capital expenditures with cash generated from
operating activities and borrowings under our credit facility.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $129.7 million for the nine-month period ended November
30, 2011, versus cash provided by financing activities of $0.5 million in the same period of the
prior year. Cash used in financing activities in the nine-month period ended November 30, 2011
primarily relates to net payments related to our senior credit agreement of $122.7 million,
payments to either purchase or purchase rights in preferred stock of $28.3 million, payments for
other debt-related costs of $4.2 million and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $3.1
million, all of which are partially offset by the issuance of senior unsecured notes of $28.5
million.
Cash provided by financing activities for the nine-month period ended November 30, 2010
primarily relates to the $3.5 million of net borrowings of debt under our Credit Agreement
partially offset by $2.8 million used to pay cash distributions to noncontrolling interests ($0.4
million of which is related to Slager and thus classified as discontinued operations).
-43-
Table of Contents
As of November 30, 2011, Emmis had $208.3 million of borrowings under the Credit
Agreement ($12.0 million current and $196.3 million long-term), $28.6 million of senior unsecured
notes (entirely long-term) and $56.4 million of Preferred Stock outstanding. Approximately $110.2
million of borrowings under the Credit Agreement bears interest pursuant to a grid under which 7.5%
to 12.25% per annum is to be paid in cash and 7.0% to 0.0% per annum is to be paid in kind, subject
to a minimum yield of 12.25% per annum. The remainder of the Credit Agreement debt bears interest,
at our option, at a rate equal to the Eurodollar rate or an alternative Base Rate plus a margin.
The senior unsecured notes compound quarterly at a rate of 22.95% per annum and is paid in kind,
except that during the continuance of any event of default the rate will be 24.95% per annum
payable on demand in cash. As of November 30, 2011, our weighted average borrowing rate under our
Credit Agreement was approximately 8.6%. Including the senior unsecured notes, our weighted
average borrowing rate at November 30, 2011 was 10.4%.
The debt service requirements of Emmis over the next twelve-month period are expected to be
$2.0 million for mandatory repayment of term notes under our Credit Agreement, $10.0 million for
revolver borrowings under our Credit Agreement as the revolver is set to expire on November 2,
2012, and a minimum of $8.3 million related to interest on the Extended Term Loans. The Company
may, at its election, choose to pay a portion of the interest due on the Extended Term Loans
in-kind. The remainder of the Credit Agreement debt bears interest at variable rates and is not
included in the debt service requirements previously discussed.
The terms of Emmis Preferred Stock provide for a quarterly dividend payment of $.78125 per
share on each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15. Emmis has not declared a preferred
stock dividend since October 15, 2008. As of the filing date of this report, cumulative preferred
dividends in arrears total $9.8 million. Failure to pay the dividend is not a default under the
terms of the Preferred Stock. However, since dividends remain unpaid for more than six quarters,
the holders of the Preferred Stock exercised their right to elect two persons to our board of
directors. One of these directors, Joseph R. Siegelbaum, subsequently resigned. The Third
Amendment to our Credit Agreement prohibits the Company from paying dividends on the Preferred
Stock during the Suspension Period (as defined in the Credit Agreement) (See Liquidity and Capital
Resources). Subject to the restrictions of the Credit Agreement, payment of future preferred
stock dividends is at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors.
As of January 4, 2012, we had $7.4 million available for additional borrowing under our credit
facility, which is net of $0.6 million in outstanding letters of credit. Availability under the
credit facility depends upon our continued compliance with certain operating covenants and
financial ratios. Emmis was in compliance with these covenants as of November 30, 2011. As part
of our business strategy, we continually evaluate potential acquisitions of radio stations,
publishing properties and other businesses that we believe hold promise for long-term appreciation
in value and leverage our strengths. However, Emmis Operating Companys Credit Agreement, as
amended, substantially limits our ability to make acquisitions. We also regularly review our
portfolio of assets and may opportunistically dispose of assets when we believe it is appropriate
to do so. See Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the
sale of one of our radio stations in New York and our two radio stations in Chicago.
Intangibles
Approximately 65% of our total assets consisted of intangible assets, such as FCC broadcast
licenses, foreign broadcasting licenses, and goodwill, the value of which depends significantly
upon the operational results of our businesses. In the case of our U.S. radio stations, we would
not be able to operate the properties without the related FCC license for each property. FCC
licenses are renewed every eight years; consequently, we continually monitor our stations
compliance with the various regulatory requirements. Historically, all of our FCC licenses have
been renewed at the end of their respective periods, and we expect that all FCC licenses will
continue to be renewed in the future. Our foreign broadcasting licenses expire during periods
ranging from February 2021 to February 2026. While all of our international broadcasting licenses
were recently extended, we will need to submit extension applications upon their expiration to
continue our broadcast operations in these countries. While we expect to actively seek renewal of
our foreign licenses, both of the countries in which we operate do not have the regulatory
framework or history that we have with respect to license renewals in the United States. This
makes the risk of non-renewal (or of renewal on less favorable terms) of foreign licenses greater
than for United States licenses.
-44-
Table of Contents
Regulatory, Legal and Other Matters
Certain individuals and groups have challenged applications for renewal of the FCC licenses of
certain of the Companys stations. The challenges to the license renewal applications are
currently pending before the FCC. Emmis does not expect the challenges to result in the denial of
any license renewals.
On December 24, 2010, Emmis entered into an agreement with Bose McKinney & Evans, LLP (Bose)
and JS Acquisition LLC for the purpose of coordinating the prosecution of certain litigation (the
Litigation) by JS Acquisition against Alden Global Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, L.P.,
Alden Global Value Recovery Master Fund, L.P., and Alden Media Holdings, LLC (collectively,
Alden) relating to the going private transaction in which Emmis, JS Acquisition and Alden
participated. Under the terms of the agreement, Bose represented both Emmis and JS Acquisition in
connection with the Litigation. Subsequently, Alden sued each of the directors of Emmis in New
York state court alleging breach of fiduciary duty and related claims. Aldens suit against each
of the directors was dismissed on July 14, 2011. In addition, on March 21, 2011, Emmis filed suit
against Alden in Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking recoupment
of approximately $0.3 million of short-swing profits under section 16 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. Also, on November 18, 2011, Emmis filed suit against Joseph R. Siegelbaum, a director
elected by the preferred shareholders in July 2011, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and tortious
interference with prospective business advantage. In connection with the purchase of preferred
stock owned by Alden discussed in Note 11, Alden, Emmis, Joseph R. Siegelbaum and Jeffrey H.
Smulyan entered into a mutual release of any claims existing between (i) Alden, certain affiliated
entities, Joseph R. Siegelbaum and certain other persons, on the one hand, and (ii) Emmis, certain
affiliated entities, Jeffrey H. Smulyan, Emmis Chief Executive Officer and President, and certain
entities affiliated with Mr. Smulyan, on the other hand. The mutual release became effective
November 28, 2011.
The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management of the Company, there are no legal proceedings pending
against the Company likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Effective December 31, 2009, our radio music license agreements with the two largest
performance rights organizations, American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP)
and Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI), expired. The Radio Music License Committee (RMLC), which
negotiates music licensing fees for most of the radio industry with ASCAP and BMI and of which we
are a participant, filed motions in the U.S. District Court in New York against BMI and ASCAP on
behalf of the radio industry, seeking interim fees and a determination of fair and reasonable
industry-wide license fees. The U.S. District Court in New York approved reduced interim fees for
ASCAP and BMI. The final fees, still to be determined by the court, may be retroactive to January
1, 2010 and may be different from the interim fees.
The Company is a party to various other legal and regulatory proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management of the Company, there are no other legal
or regulatory proceedings pending against the Company that are likely to have a material adverse
effect on the Company.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this information.
-45-
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure
Controls). This evaluation (the Controls Evaluation) was performed under the supervision and
with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief
Financial Officer (CFO).
Based upon the Controls Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that as of November 30, 2011 our
Disclosure Controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information relating to
Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this quarterly report, there were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
It should be noted that any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives will be met.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
Refer to Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for a discussion of various legal proceedings pending against the Company.
-46-
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
During the three-month period ended November 30, 2011, we purchased 1,681,429 shares of Series
A cumulative convertible preferred stock pursuant to a previously approved repurchase program. No
common stock repurchases were made during the three-month period ended November 30, 2011, nor was
there withholding of shares of stock upon vesting of restricted stock to cover withholding tax
obligations. The following table provides information on our purchases of preferred stock during
the three months ended November 30, 2011:
(c) | (d) | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Approximate | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as | Dollar Value of | |||||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | Part of Publicly | Shares That May | |||||||||||||
Total Number | Average Price | Announced | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Paid Per | Plans or | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Purchased | Share | Programs | Programs (in 000s) (1) | |||||||||||||
September 1, 2011 September 30,
2011 |
| N/A | | $ | | |||||||||||
October 1, 2011 October 31, 2011 |
| N/A | | $ | | |||||||||||
November 1, 2011 November 30,
2011 |
1,681,429 | 15.56 | 1,681,429 | $ | 6,507 | |||||||||||
1,681,429 | 1,681,429 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | On November 14, 2011, the Company announced that under the terms of its
senior unsecured notes, the Company has the ability to purchase up to $35.0 million of its
outstanding Series A cumulative convertible preferred stock. As of November 30, 2011, the
Company has $6.5 million available to it for preferred stock transactions. Any prior share
repurchase program is no longer operative. During the month ended November 30, 2011, Emmis
purchased 1,681,429 preferred shares at an average price of $15.56 per share. In connection
with the preferred share purchases, Emmis incurred approximately $2.3 million of fees and
expenses which reduced availability of funds to purchase additional preferred shares. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
The terms of Emmis Preferred Stock provide for a quarterly dividend payment of $.78125 per
share on each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15. Emmis has not declared a preferred
stock dividend since October 15, 2008. As of the filing date of this report, cumulative preferred
dividends in arrears total $9.8 million. Failure to pay the dividend is not a default under the
terms of the Preferred Stock. However, since dividends remain unpaid for more than six quarters,
the holders of the Preferred Stock exercised their right to elect two persons to our board of
directors. One of these directors, Joseph R. Siegelbaum, subsequently resigned.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as a part of
this report:
3.1 | Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Emmis
Communications Corporation, as amended effective June 13, 2005 incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 2006. |
|||
3.2 | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed June 3, 2011. |
|||
4.1 | Note Purchase Agreement, dated November 10, 2011, by and between
Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (b) to the Companys Schedule TO-I filed
December 1, 2011. |
-47-
Table of Contents
10.1 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2011, by and
between Emmis Operating Company and Patrick M. Walsh.*++ |
|||
10.2 | Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of September 4,
2011, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Patrick M. Walsh.*++ |
|||
10.3 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 28, 2011, by and
between Alden Global Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis
Communications Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(1) to the
Companys Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.4 | Voting Agreement, dated November 28, 2011, by and among Alden
Global Distressed Opportunities Master Fund, L.P., J. Scott Enright, and Emmis
Communications Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(2) to the
Companys Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.5 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 14, 2011, by and
between Valinor Credit Partners Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(3) to the Companys
Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.6 | Voting Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and among Valinor
Credit Partners Master Fund, L.P., J. Scott Enright, and Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(4) to the Companys
Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.7 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 14, 2011, by and
between Sugarloaf Rock Capital, LLC and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(5) to the Companys Schedule TO-I/A
filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.8 | Voting Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and among Sugarloaf
Rock Capital, LLC, J. Scott Enright, and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(6) to the Companys Schedule TO-I/A
filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.9 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 14, 2011, by and
between Third Point Partners Qualified L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(7) to the Companys Schedule TO-I/A
filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.10 | Voting Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and among Third
Point Partners Qualified L.P., J. Scott Enright, and Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(8) to the Companys
Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
-48-
Table of Contents
10.11 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 14, 2011, by and
between Third Point Partners L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(9) to the Companys Schedule TO-I/A
filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.12 | Voting Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and among Third
Point Partners L.P., J. Scott Enright, and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(10) to the Companys Schedule TO-I/A
filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.13 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 14, 2011, by and
between Third Point Offshore Master Fund L.P. and Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(11) to the Companys
Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.14 | Voting Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and among Third
Point Offshore Master Fund L.P., J. Scott Enright, and Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(12) to the Companys
Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.15 | Total Return Swap Confirmation, dated November 14, 2011, by and
between Third Point Ultra Master Fund L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation
incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(13) to the Companys Schedule TO-I/A
filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.16 | Voting Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and among Third
Point Ultra Master Fund L.P., J. Scott Enright, and Emmis Communications
Corporation incorporated by reference from Exhibit (d)(14) to the Companys
Schedule TO-I/A filed December 2, 2011. |
|||
10.17 | Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
of Merlin Media, dated September 1, 2011 incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed September 2, 2011. |
|||
10.18 | Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and
Term Loan Agreement.* |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Emmis
Communications Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.* |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Emmis
Communications Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act.* |
|||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer of
Emmis Communications Corporation.* |
|||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer of
Emmis Communications Corporation.* |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document** |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document** |
-49-
Table of Contents
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document** |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document** |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document** |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document** |
* | Filed with this report |
|
** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or
part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are
not subject to liability. |
-50-
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION |
||||
Date: January 12, 2012 | By: | /s/ PATRICK M. WALSH | ||
Patrick M. Walsh | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer | ||||
-51-