Employers Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2015 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
R QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2015
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission file number: 001-33245
EMPLOYERS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 04-3850065 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
10375 Professional Circle, Reno, Nevada 89521 (Address of principal executive offices and zip code) |
(888) 682-6671
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer R | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No R
Class | April 24, 2015 | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | 31,892,010 shares outstanding |
Page No. | ||
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | ||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
As of | As of | |||||||
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
Assets | (unaudited) | |||||||
Available for sale: | ||||||||
Fixed maturity securities at fair value (amortized cost $2,256,400 at March 31, 2015 and $2,186,100 at December 31, 2014) | $ | 2,360,100 | $ | 2,275,700 | ||||
Equity securities at fair value (cost $98,900 at March 31, 2015 and $97,800 at December 31, 2014) | 172,600 | 172,700 | ||||||
Short-term investments at fair value (amortized cost $9,000 at March 31, 2015) | 9,000 | — | ||||||
Total investments | 2,541,700 | 2,448,400 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 45,600 | 103,600 | ||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 8,400 | 10,800 | ||||||
Accrued investment income | 19,200 | 20,500 | ||||||
Premiums receivable (less bad debt allowance of $9,000 at March 31, 2015 and $7,900 at December 31, 2014) | 296,300 | 295,800 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverable for: | ||||||||
Paid losses | 7,900 | 10,700 | ||||||
Unpaid losses, including bad debt allowance | 663,000 | 669,500 | ||||||
Deferred policy acquisition costs | 46,700 | 44,600 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net | 43,400 | 49,700 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 20,300 | 21,000 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 8,900 | 9,000 | ||||||
Goodwill | 36,200 | 36,200 | ||||||
Contingent commission receivable—LPT Agreement | 26,600 | 26,400 | ||||||
Other assets | 36,500 | 23,500 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 3,800,700 | $ | 3,769,700 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Claims and policy liabilities: | ||||||||
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | $ | 2,370,300 | $ | 2,369,700 | ||||
Unearned premiums | 324,600 | 310,800 | ||||||
Total claims and policy liabilities | 2,694,900 | 2,680,500 | ||||||
Commissions and premium taxes payable | 45,500 | 46,300 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 16,900 | 20,400 | ||||||
Deferred reinsurance gain—LPT Agreement | 204,100 | 207,000 | ||||||
Notes payable | 92,000 | 92,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 37,800 | 36,700 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 3,091,200 | 3,082,900 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 55,248,130 and 54,866,802 shares issued and 31,875,156 and 31,493,828 shares outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | 600 | 600 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | — | — | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 348,700 | 346,600 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 607,500 | 595,300 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net | 115,300 | 106,900 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (23,372,974 shares at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014) | (362,600 | ) | (362,600 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 709,500 | 686,800 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 3,800,700 | $ | 3,769,700 |
See accompanying unaudited notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | ||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Revenues | (unaudited) | |||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 159,000 | $ | 167,200 | ||||
Net investment income | 16,900 | 18,000 | ||||||
Net realized gains on investments | 1,200 | 3,300 | ||||||
Other income | 100 | — | ||||||
Total revenues | 177,200 | 188,500 | ||||||
Expenses | ||||||||
Losses and loss adjustment expenses | 106,200 | 122,300 | ||||||
Commission expense | 18,700 | 20,000 | ||||||
Underwriting and other operating expenses | 33,500 | 33,300 | ||||||
Interest expense | 700 | 800 | ||||||
Total expenses | 159,100 | 176,400 | ||||||
Net income before income taxes | 18,100 | 12,100 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 4,100 | 1,300 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 14,000 | $ | 10,800 | ||||
Earnings per common share (Note 9): | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 | ||||
Comprehensive income | ||||||||
Unrealized gains during the period (net of tax expense of $5,000 and $5,500 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively) | $ | 9,200 | $ | 10,200 | ||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income (net of taxes of $400 and $1,200 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively) | (800 | ) | (2,100 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | 8,400 | 8,100 | ||||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 22,400 | $ | 18,900 | ||||
Net realized gains on investments | ||||||||
Net realized gains on investments before credit related impairments on fixed maturity securities | $ | 1,200 | $ | 3,300 | ||||
Other than temporary impairment, credit losses recognized in earnings | — | — | ||||||
Net realized gains on investments | $ | 1,200 | $ | 3,300 |
See accompanying unaudited notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | ||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
Operating activities | (unaudited) | |||||||
Net income | $ | 14,000 | $ | 10,800 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,700 | 1,800 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,800 | 1,600 | ||||||
Amortization of premium on investments, net | 3,200 | 2,500 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense | 1,800 | (1,000 | ) | |||||
Realized gains on investments, net | (1,200 | ) | (3,300 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | (600 | ) | (1,100 | ) | ||||
Other | 1,600 | 200 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Premiums receivable | (1,600 | ) | (15,000 | ) | ||||
Reinsurance recoverable for paid and unpaid losses | 9,300 | 7,400 | ||||||
Federal income taxes | (1,600 | ) | 1,400 | |||||
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses | 600 | 27,700 | ||||||
Unearned premiums | 13,800 | 16,700 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | (1,500 | ) | (3,400 | ) | ||||
Deferred reinsurance gain—LPT Agreement | (2,900 | ) | (3,900 | ) | ||||
Contingent commission receivable—LPT Agreement | (200 | ) | (400 | ) | ||||
Other | (13,400 | ) | (3,400 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 24,800 | 38,600 | ||||||
Investing activities | ||||||||
Purchase of fixed maturity securities | (168,000 | ) | (94,500 | ) | ||||
Purchase of equity securities | (8,000 | ) | (7,800 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed maturity securities | — | 35,100 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of equity securities | 8,200 | 7,900 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions of investments | 85,100 | 42,400 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets | — | — | ||||||
Capital expenditures | (900 | ) | (1,500 | ) | ||||
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents | 2,400 | (2,400 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (81,200 | ) | (20,800 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | ||||||||
Cash transactions related to stock-based compensation | (300 | ) | (400 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid to stockholders | (1,900 | ) | (1,900 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 600 | 1,100 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (1,600 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (58,000 | ) | 16,600 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 103,600 | 34,500 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | $ | 45,600 | $ | 51,100 |
See accompanying unaudited notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
Employers Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Operations
Employers Holdings, Inc. (EHI) is a Nevada holding company. Through its wholly owned insurance subsidiaries, Employers Insurance Company of Nevada (EICN), Employers Compensation Insurance Company (ECIC), Employers Preferred Insurance Company (EPIC), and Employers Assurance Company (EAC), EHI is engaged in the commercial property and casualty insurance industry, specializing in workers' compensation products and services. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the “Company” refer to EHI, together with its subsidiaries.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for an entire year. These financial statements have been prepared consistent with the accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The Company considers an operating segment to be any component of its business whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance based on discrete financial information. Currently, the Company has one operating segment, workers’ compensation insurance and related services.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. The most significant areas that require management judgment are the estimate of unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (LAE), evaluation of reinsurance recoverables, recognition of premium revenue, deferred income taxes, valuation of investments, and the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
2. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Estimated Fair Value | Carrying Value | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial assets | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | $ | 2,541.7 | $ | 2,541.7 | $ | 2,448.4 | $ | 2,448.4 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 45.6 | 45.6 | 103.6 | 103.6 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 8.4 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 10.8 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Notes payable | 92.0 | 97.8 | 92.0 | 97.8 |
The Company's estimates of fair value for financial liabilities are based on a combination of the variable interest rates for the Company's existing line of credit and other notes with similar durations to discount the projection of future payments on notes payable. The fair value measurements for notes payable have been determined to be Level 2, as defined below.
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are categorized based upon the levels of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Level inputs are defined as follows:
• | Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. |
• | Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 prices that are observable for similar assets or liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date. |
• | Level 3 - Inputs that are unobservable that reflect management's best estimate of what willing market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities at the measurement date. |
6
Fair values of available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices and an estimate determined by using objectively verifiable information are unavailable, the Company produces an estimate of fair value based on internally developed valuation techniques, which, depending on the level of observable market inputs, will render the fair value estimate as Level 2 or Level 3. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair value for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third-party market participant would be willing to pay in an arm's length transaction.
These methods of valuation will only produce an estimate of fair value if there is objectively verifiable information to produce a valuation. If objectively verifiable information is not available, the Company would be required to produce an estimate of fair value using some of the same methodologies, making assumptions for market-based inputs that are unavailable.
The following table presents the items on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets that are stated at fair value and the corresponding fair value measurements.
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries | $ | — | $ | 160.4 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 166.7 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
U.S. Agencies | — | 38.5 | — | — | 39.6 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
States and municipalities | — | 813.4 | — | — | 745.8 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities | — | 914.7 | — | — | 908.3 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — | 294.3 | — | — | 288.4 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | — | 71.2 | — | — | 65.4 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | — | 67.6 | — | — | 61.5 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturity securities | — | 2,360.1 | — | — | 2,275.7 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 172.6 | — | — | 172.7 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments | $ | — | $ | 9.0 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
7
3. Investments
The cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s investments were as follows:
Cost or Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 153.6 | $ | 6.8 | $ | — | $ | 160.4 | ||||||||
U.S. Agencies | 36.2 | 2.3 | — | 38.5 | ||||||||||||
States and municipalities | 768.1 | 45.5 | (0.2 | ) | 813.4 | |||||||||||
Corporate securities | 878.1 | 37.7 | (1.1 | ) | 914.7 | |||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 282.5 | 12.0 | (0.2 | ) | 294.3 | |||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 70.3 | 1.0 | (0.1 | ) | 71.2 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 67.6 | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 67.6 | |||||||||||
Total fixed maturity securities | 2,256.4 | 105.4 | (1.7 | ) | 2,360.1 | |||||||||||
Equity securities | 98.9 | 75.0 | (1.3 | ) | 172.6 | |||||||||||
Short-term investments | 9.0 | — | — | 9.0 | ||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 2,364.3 | $ | 180.4 | $ | (3.0 | ) | $ | 2,541.7 |
At December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 160.9 | $ | 5.8 | $ | — | $ | 166.7 | ||||||||
U.S. Agencies | 37.2 | 2.4 | — | 39.6 | ||||||||||||
States and municipalities | 701.6 | 44.4 | (0.2 | ) | 745.8 | |||||||||||
Corporate securities | 880.7 | 30.8 | (3.2 | ) | 908.3 | |||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 278.6 | 10.6 | (0.8 | ) | 288.4 | |||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 65.5 | 0.5 | (0.6 | ) | 65.4 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 61.6 | — | (0.1 | ) | 61.5 | |||||||||||
Total fixed maturity securities | 2,186.1 | 94.5 | (4.9 | ) | 2,275.7 | |||||||||||
Equity securities | 97.8 | 75.5 | (0.6 | ) | 172.7 | |||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 2,283.9 | $ | 170.0 | $ | (5.5 | ) | $ | 2,448.4 |
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities at March 31, 2015, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Amortized Cost | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less | $ | 165.2 | $ | 167.2 | ||||
Due after one year through five years | 798.6 | 836.0 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years | 619.5 | 653.3 | ||||||
Due after ten years | 252.6 | 270.4 | ||||||
Mortgage and asset-backed securities | 420.5 | 433.2 | ||||||
Total | $ | 2,256.4 | $ | 2,360.1 |
8
The following is a summary of investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | Number of Issues | Estimated Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Losses | Number of Issues | |||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except number of issues data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
States and municipalities | $ | 36.9 | $ | (0.2 | ) | 8 | $ | 20.6 | $ | (0.2 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||
Corporate securities | 59.8 | (0.5 | ) | 27 | 109.9 | (0.8 | ) | 42 | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 25.8 | (0.1 | ) | 10 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 10.3 | (0.1 | ) | 4 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturity securities | 132.8 | (0.9 | ) | 49 | 130.5 | (1.0 | ) | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 20.2 | (1.2 | ) | 30 | 10.1 | (0.6 | ) | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Total less than 12 months | $ | 153.0 | $ | (2.1 | ) | 79 | $ | 140.6 | $ | (1.6 | ) | 62 | ||||||||||
12 months or greater: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate securities | $ | 46.0 | $ | (0.6 | ) | 15 | $ | 129.4 | $ | (2.4 | ) | 39 | ||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 9.8 | (0.1 | ) | 27 | 44.1 | (0.8 | ) | 36 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | — | — | — | 31.3 | (0.6 | ) | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 19.9 | (0.1 | ) | 6 | 18.3 | (0.1 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturity securities | 75.7 | (0.8 | ) | 48 | 223.1 | (3.9 | ) | 89 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 0.6 | (0.1 | ) | 2 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total 12 months or greater | $ | 76.3 | $ | (0.9 | ) | 50 | $ | 223.1 | $ | (3.9 | ) | 89 | ||||||||||
Total available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
States and municipalities | $ | 36.9 | $ | (0.2 | ) | 8 | $ | 20.6 | $ | (0.2 | ) | 5 | ||||||||||
Corporate securities | 105.8 | (1.1 | ) | 42 | 239.3 | (3.2 | ) | 81 | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 35.6 | (0.2 | ) | 37 | 44.1 | (0.8 | ) | 36 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 10.3 | (0.1 | ) | 4 | 31.3 | (0.6 | ) | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 19.9 | (0.1 | ) | 6 | 18.3 | (0.1 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Total fixed maturity securities | 208.5 | (1.7 | ) | 97 | 353.6 | (4.9 | ) | 136 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 20.8 | (1.3 | ) | 32 | 10.1 | (0.6 | ) | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale | $ | 229.3 | $ | (3.0 | ) | 129 | $ | 363.7 | $ | (5.5 | ) | 151 |
Based on reviews of the fixed maturity securities, the Company determined that unrealized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were primarily the result of changes in prevailing interest rates and not the credit quality of the issuers. The fixed maturity securities whose total fair value was less than amortized cost were not determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired given the severity and duration of the impairment, the credit quality of the issuers, the Company’s intent to not sell the securities, and a determination that it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities until fair value recovers to above amortized cost, or maturity.
Based on reviews of the equity securities for the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company determined that the unrealized losses as of that date were not considered to be other-than-temporary due to the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers.
Net realized gains on investments and the change in unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity and equity securities are determined on a specific-identification basis and were as follows:
9
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Net realized gains on investments | ||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | ||||||||
Gross gains | $ | — | $ | 0.8 | ||||
Gross losses | — | — | ||||||
Net realized gains on fixed maturity securities | $ | — | $ | 0.8 | ||||
Equity securities | ||||||||
Gross gains | $ | 1.5 | $ | 2.5 | ||||
Gross losses | (0.3 | ) | — | |||||
Net realized gains on equity securities | $ | 1.2 | $ | 2.5 | ||||
Total | $ | 1.2 | $ | 3.3 | ||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) | ||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | $ | 14.1 | $ | 13.3 | ||||
Equity securities | (1.2 | ) | (0.8 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 12.9 | $ | 12.5 |
Net investment income was as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Fixed maturity securities | $ | 16.4 | $ | 17.6 | ||||
Equity securities | 1.1 | 1.0 | ||||||
Cash equivalents and restricted cash | — | — | ||||||
17.5 | 18.6 | |||||||
Investment expenses | (0.6 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Net investment income | $ | 16.9 | $ | 18.0 |
The Company is required by various state laws and regulations to keep securities or letters of credit in depository accounts with certain states in which it does business. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, securities having a fair value of $917.3 million and $783.9 million, respectively, were on deposit. These laws and regulations govern not only the amount, but also the types of securities that are eligible for deposit. The deposits are limited to fixed maturity securities in all states. Additionally, certain reinsurance contracts require Company funds to be held in trust for the benefit of the ceding reinsurer to secure the outstanding liabilities assumed by the Company. The fair value of fixed maturity securities held in trust for the benefit of ceding reinsurers at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $31.3 million and $31.2 million, respectively. Pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo (Amended Credit Facility), a portion of the Company's debt was secured by fixed maturity securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents that had a fair value of $74.0 million and $74.6 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
4. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for interim periods is measured using an estimated effective tax rate for the annual period. The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rates for the periods presented.
Three Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, | ||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||
Expense computed at statutory rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||
Dividends received deduction and tax-exempt interest | (8.8 | ) | (16.0 | ) | ||
LPT deferred gain amortization | (4.2 | ) | (8.5 | ) | ||
LPT reserve adjustment | — | (0.4 | ) | |||
Other | 0.5 | 0.8 | ||||
Effective tax rate | 22.5 | % | 10.9 | % |
5. Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The following table represents a reconciliation of changes in the liability for unpaid losses and LAE.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Unpaid losses and LAE, gross of reinsurance, at beginning of period | $ | 2,369.7 | $ | 2,330.5 | ||||
Less reinsurance recoverable, excluding bad debt allowance, on unpaid losses and LAE | 669.5 | 743.1 | ||||||
Net unpaid losses and LAE at beginning of period | 1,700.2 | 1,587.4 | ||||||
Losses and LAE, net of reinsurance, related to: | ||||||||
Current period | 107.7 | 124.8 | ||||||
Prior periods | 1.7 | 1.8 | ||||||
Total net losses and LAE incurred during the period | 109.4 | 126.6 | ||||||
Paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance, related to: | ||||||||
Current period | 4.2 | 4.5 | ||||||
Prior periods | 98.1 | 87.1 | ||||||
Total net paid losses and LAE during the period | 102.3 | 91.6 | ||||||
Ending unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance | 1,707.3 | 1,622.4 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverable, excluding bad debt allowance, on unpaid losses and LAE | 663.0 | 735.8 | ||||||
Unpaid losses and LAE, gross of reinsurance, at end of period | $ | 2,370.3 | $ | 2,358.2 |
Total net losses and LAE included in the above table excludes the impact of the aggregate of the amortization of the deferred reinsurance gain—LPT Agreement, LPT Reserve Adjustments, and LPT Contingent Commission Adjustments, which totaled $3.1 million and $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively (Note 6).
The increase in the estimates of incurred losses and LAE attributable to insured events for prior periods was related to the Company's assigned risk business.
6. LPT Agreement
The Company is party to a 100% quota share retroactive reinsurance agreement (LPT Agreement) under which $1.5 billion in liabilities for losses and LAE related to claims incurred by EICN prior to July 1, 1995 were reinsured for consideration of $775.0 million. The LPT Agreement provides coverage up to $2.0 billion. The initial Deferred Gain resulting from the LPT Agreement was recorded as a liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as Deferred reinsurance gain–LPT Agreement. The Company is also entitled to receive a contingent profit commission under the LPT Agreement. The contingent profit commission is an amount based on the favorable difference between actual paid losses and LAE and expected paid losses and LAE as established in the LPT Agreement. The Company records its estimate of contingent profit commission in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as Contingent commission receivable–LPT Agreement and a corresponding liability is recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in Deferred reinsurance gain–LPT Agreement. The Deferred Gain is being amortized using the recovery method. Amortization is determined by the proportion of actual reinsurance recoveries to total estimated recoveries over the life of the LPT Agreement, except for the contingent profit commission, which is amortized through June 30, 2024. The amortization is recorded in losses and LAE incurred in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive
10
income. Any adjustments to the Deferred Gain are recorded in losses and LAE incurred in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The Company amortized $2.9 million and $3.3 million of the Deferred Gain for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Additionally, the Deferred Gain was reduced by $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 due to a favorable LPT Reserve Adjustment and by $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, due to favorable LPT Contingent Commission Adjustments. The remaining Deferred Gain was $204.1 million and $207.0 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The estimated remaining liabilities subject to the LPT Agreement were $527.9 million and $534.8 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Losses and LAE paid with respect to the LPT Agreement totaled $675.2 million and $668.4 million from inception through March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
7. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, net
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net, is comprised of unrealized gains on investments classified as available-for-sale, net of deferred tax expense. The following table summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net:
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Net unrealized gain on investments, before taxes | $ | 177.4 | $ | 164.5 | ||||
Deferred tax expense on net unrealized gains | (62.1 | ) | (57.6 | ) | ||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive income, net | $ | 115.3 | $ | 106.9 |
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company awarded stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs) to certain officers of the Company as follows:
Number Awarded | Weighted Average Fair Value on Date of Grant | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Aggregate Fair Value on Date of Grant | |||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||
March 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Stock options(1) | 80,800 | $ | 7.63 | $ | 24.20 | $ | 0.6 | |||||||
RSUs(1) | 89,602 | 24.20 | — | 2.2 | ||||||||||
PSUs(2) | 110,000 | 24.20 | — | 2.7 |
(1) | The stock options and RSUs awarded in March 2015 were awarded to certain officers of the Company and vest 25% on March 15, 2016, and each of the subsequent three anniversaries of that date. The stock options and RSUs are subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances, including but not limited to: death, disability, retirement, or in connection with change of control of the Company. The stock options expire seven years from the date of grant. |
(2) | The PSUs awarded in March 2015 were awarded to certain officers of the Company and have a performance period of two years followed by an additional one year vesting period. The PSU awards are subject to certain performance goals with payouts that range from 0% to 200% of the target awards. The value shown in the table represents the aggregate number of PSUs awarded at the target level. |
A total of 131,056 and 120,494 stock options were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, respectively.
11
9. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income applicable to stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilutive impact of all convertible securities on earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share includes shares assumed issued under the “treasury stock method,” which reflects the potential dilution that would occur if outstanding options were to be exercised. The following table presents the net income and the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the earnings per common share calculations.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions, except share data) | ||||||||
Net income available to stockholders—basic and diluted | $ | 14.0 | $ | 10.8 | ||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—basic | 31,740,923 | 31,409,322 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||
PSUs | 322,850 | 214,121 | ||||||
Stock options | 310,899 | 277,376 | ||||||
RSUs | 79,392 | 89,151 | ||||||
Dilutive potential shares | 713,141 | 580,648 | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding—diluted | 32,454,064 | 31,989,970 |
Diluted earnings per share excludes outstanding options and other common stock equivalents in periods where the inclusion of such options and common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive. The following table presents options and RSUs that were excluded from diluted earnings per share.
Three Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, | ||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||
Options and RSUs excluded under the treasury method as the potential proceeds on settlement or exercise price were greater than the value of shares acquired | 267,444 | 296,844 |
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or similar terms refer to Employers Holdings, Inc. (EHI), together with its subsidiaries. The information contained in this quarterly report is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this quarterly report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (Annual Report).
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements if accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements include those related to our expected financial position, business, financing plans, litigation, future premiums, revenues, earnings, pricing, investments, business relationships, expected losses, loss experience, loss reserves, acquisitions, competition, the impact of changes in interest rates, rate increases with respect to our business, and the insurance industry in general. Statements including words such as “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “anticipate,” “will,” or similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. All forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results, depending on a number of factors. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in our Annual Report and other documents that we have filed with the SEC.
Overview
We are a Nevada holding company. Through our insurance subsidiaries, we provide workers’ compensation insurance coverage to select, small businesses in low to medium hazard industries. Workers’ compensation insurance is provided under a statutory system wherein most employers are required to provide coverage for their employees’ medical, disability, vocational rehabilitation, and/or death benefit costs for work-related injuries or illnesses. We provide workers’ compensation insurance in 31 states and the District of Columbia, with a concentration in California, where over one-half of our business is generated. Our revenues are primarily comprised of net premiums earned, net investment income, and net realized gains on investments.
We target small businesses, as we believe that this market is traditionally characterized by fewer competitors, more attractive pricing, and stronger persistency when compared to the U.S. workers’ compensation insurance industry in general. We believe we are able to price our policies at levels that are competitive and profitable over the long-term. Our underwriting approach is to consistently underwrite small business accounts at appropriate and competitive prices without sacrificing long-term profitability and stability for short-term top-line revenue growth.
Our strategy is to pursue profitable growth opportunities across market cycles and maximize total investment returns within the constraints of prudent portfolio management. We pursue profitable growth opportunities by focusing on disciplined underwriting and claims management, utilizing medical provider networks designed to produce superior medical and indemnity outcomes, establishing and maintaining strong, long-term relationships with independent insurance agencies, and developing important alternative distribution channels. We continue to execute a number of strategic initiatives, including: focusing on internal and customer facing business process excellence; slowing policy count growth in California as we diversify our risk exposure across our markets; utilizing a three-company pricing platform in California with territorial multipliers; strengthening the linkage between pricing and class code performance; non-renewing under-performing business; and targeting attractive classes of business across all of our markets.
13
Results of Operations
A primary measure of our performance is our ability to increase stockholders’ equity, including the impact of the Deferred reinsurance gain–LPT Agreement (Deferred Gain), over the long-term. During periods of rising interest rates, the fair value of the fixed income component of our investment portfolio may be negatively impacted, thereby reducing stockholders' equity. The following table shows our stockholders' equity on a GAAP basis, stockholders' equity including the Deferred Gain, and number of common shares outstanding.
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||
(in millions, except share data) | ||||||||
GAAP stockholders' equity | $ | 709.5 | $ | 686.8 | ||||
Deferred reinsurance gain–LPT Agreement | 204.1 | 207.0 | ||||||
Stockholders' equity including the Deferred Gain(1) | $ | 913.6 | $ | 893.8 | ||||
Common shares outstanding | 31,875,156 | 31,493,828 |
(1) | Stockholders' equity including the Deferred Gain is a non-GAAP measure that is defined as total stockholders' equity plus the Deferred Gain, which we believe is an important supplemental measure of our capital position. |
Overall, net income was $14.0 million and $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We recognized underwriting income (losses) of $0.6 million and $(8.4) million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Underwriting income or loss is determined by deducting losses and LAE, commission expense, and underwriting and other operating expenses from net premiums earned.
The comparative components of net income are set forth in the following table:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 174.0 | $ | 186.0 | ||||
Net premiums written | 171.9 | 183.3 | ||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 159.0 | $ | 167.2 | ||||
Net investment income | 16.9 | 18.0 | ||||||
Net realized gains on investments | 1.2 | 3.3 | ||||||
Other income | 0.1 | — | ||||||
Total revenues | 177.2 | 188.5 | ||||||
Losses and LAE | 106.2 | 122.3 | ||||||
Commission expense | 18.7 | 20.0 | ||||||
Underwriting and other operating expenses | 33.5 | 33.3 | ||||||
Interest expense | 0.7 | 0.8 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 4.1 | 1.3 | ||||||
Total expenses | 163.2 | 177.7 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 14.0 | $ | 10.8 | ||||
Less amortization of the Deferred Gain related to losses | $ | 2.4 | $ | 2.9 | ||||
Less amortization of the Deferred Gain related to contingent commission | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||||||
Less impact of LPT Reserve Adjustments(1) | — | 0.7 | ||||||
Less impact of LPT Contingent Commission Adjustments(2) | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
Net income before impact of the LPT Agreement(3) | $ | 10.9 | $ | 6.5 |
(1) | Any adjustment to the estimated reserves ceded under the LPT Agreement results in a cumulative adjustment to the Deferred Gain, which is also included in losses and LAE incurred in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, such that the Deferred Gain reflects the balance that would have existed had the revised reserves been recognized at the inception of the LPT Agreement (LPT Reserve Adjustment). |
(2) | Any adjustment to the contingent profit commission under the LPT Agreement results in a cumulative adjustment to the Deferred Gain, which is also recognized in losses and LAE incurred in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, such that the Deferred Gain |
14
reflects the balance that would have existed had the revised contingent profit commission been recognized at the inception of the LPT Agreement (LPT Contingent Commission Adjustments).
(3) | We define net income before impact of the LPT Agreement as net income before the impact of: (a) amortization of Deferred Gain; (b) adjustments to LPT Agreement ceded reserves; and (c) adjustments to contingent commission receivable–LPT Agreement. Deferred Gain reflects the unamortized gain from our LPT Agreement. Under GAAP, this gain is deferred and is being amortized using the recovery method. Amortization is determined by the proportion of actual reinsurance recoveries to total estimated recoveries over the life of the LPT Agreement, except for the contingent profit commission, which is amortized through June 30, 2024. The amortization is reflected in losses and LAE. We periodically reevaluate the remaining direct reserves subject to the LPT Agreement and the expected losses and LAE subject to the contingent profit commission under the LPT Agreement. Our reevaluation results in corresponding adjustments, if needed, to reserves, ceded reserves, contingent commission receivable, and the Deferred Gain, with the net effect being an increase or decrease, as the case may be, to net income. Net income before impact of the LPT Agreement is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP, but rather reflects a difference in accounting treatment between statutory and GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income before income taxes or net income, or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. |
We present net income before impact of the LPT Agreement because we believe that it is an important supplemental measure of operating performance to be used by analysts, investors, and other interested parties in evaluating us. The LPT Agreement was a non-recurring transaction under which the Deferred Gain does not effect our ongoing operations, and, consequently, we believe this presentation is useful in providing a meaningful understanding of our operating performance. In addition, we believe this non-GAAP measure, as we have defined it, is helpful to our management in identifying trends in our performance because the LPT Agreement has limited significance on our current and ongoing operations.
Gross Premiums Written
Gross premiums written decreased 6.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014. This change was primarily the result of certain strategic initiatives, including slowing policy count growth in California as we diversify our risk exposure across our markets, strengthening the linkage between pricing and class code performance, and non-renewing under-performing business.
Net Premiums Earned
Net premiums earned decreased 4.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014. This decrease was primarily due to decreasing policy count and payroll exposure, primarily in Southern California, which was partially offset by higher net rate. Fifty-eight percent of our in-force premiums were generated in California and no other state represented a significant concentration of business as of March 31, 2015.
The following table shows the percentage change in our in-force premiums, policy count, average policy size, payroll exposure upon which our premiums are based, and net rate overall and for California:
As of March 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
Year-to-Date Increase (Decrease) | Year-Over-Year Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Overall | California | Overall | California | ||||||||
In-force premiums | (0.3 | )% | (1.4 | )% | (0.7 | )% | (3.2 | )% | |||
In-force policy count | (0.8 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (5.8 | ) | |||
Average in-force policy size | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.7 | |||||||
In-force payroll exposure | (0.3 | ) | (3.8 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (13.9 | ) | |||
Net rate(1) | — | 2.5 | 3.1 | 12.4 |
(1) | Net rate, defined as total in-force premiums divided by total insured payroll exposure, is a function of a variety of factors, including rate changes, underwriting risk profiles and pricing, and changes in business mix related to economic and competitive pressures. |
Our in-force premiums and number of policies in-force for California and all other states combined were as follows:
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
State | In-force Premiums | Policies In-force | In-force Premiums | Policies In-force | In-force Premiums | Policies In-force | In-force Premiums | Policies In-force | ||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
California | $ | 365.7 | 45,915 | $ | 370.8 | 47,093 | $ | 377.8 | 48,732 | $ | 367.8 | 48,032 | ||||||||||||||||
Other | 260.2 | 38,689 | 257.1 | 38,209 | 252.4 | 36,569 | 249.6 | 36,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 625.9 | 84,604 | $ | 627.9 | 85,302 | $ | 630.2 | 85,301 | $ | 617.4 | 84,056 |
Our alternative distribution channels that utilize partnerships and alliances generated $146.8 million and $146.2 million, or 23.5% and 23.2%, of our in-force premiums as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We believe that the bundling of products and services through these relationships contributes to higher retention rates than business generated by our independent agents. These
15
relationships also allow us to access new customers that we may not have access to through our independent agent distribution channel. We continue to actively seek new partnerships and alliances.
Our net rate (total in-force premiums divided by total insured payroll exposure) increased 2.5% in California during the three months ended March 31, 2015. Pricing in California reflects changes to schedule rating, filed rates, and experience modifiers. We began leveraging territorial multipliers and multiple insurance subsidiaries, each with different rate filings, to provide additional pricing options in California for policies incepting on or after June 1, 2014.
Net Investment Income and Net Realized Gains on Investments
We invest our holding company assets, statutory surplus, and the funds supporting our insurance liabilities, including unearned premiums and unpaid losses and LAE. We invest in fixed maturity securities, equity securities, short-term investments, and cash equivalents. Net investment income includes interest and dividends earned on our invested assets and amortization of premiums and discounts on our fixed maturity securities, less bank service charges and custodial and portfolio management fees. We have established a high quality/short duration bias in our investment portfolio.
Net investment income decreased 6.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014. This decrease was primarily related to a decrease in the average pre-tax book yield on invested assets to 3.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to 3.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The tax-equivalent yield on invested assets decreased to 3.8% at March 31, 2015, compared to 4.0% at March 31, 2014.
Realized gains and losses on our investments are reported separately from our net investment income. Realized gains and losses on investments include the gain or loss on a security at the time of sale compared to its original or adjusted cost (equity securities) or amortized cost (fixed maturity securities). Realized losses are also recognized when securities are written down as a result of an other-than-temporary impairment.
Net realized gains on investments were $1.2 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Additional information regarding our Investments is set forth under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Investments.”
Combined Ratio
The combined ratio, a key measurement of underwriting profitability, is the sum of the loss and LAE ratio, the commission expense ratio, and underwriting and other operating expenses ratio. When the combined ratio is below 100%, we have recorded underwriting income, and conversely, when the combined ratio is greater than 100%, we have recorded an underwriting loss and cannot be profitable without investment income. Because we only have one operating segment, holding company expenses are included in our calculation of the combined ratio and increased the combined ratio by 2.3 and 2.0 percentage points for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following table provides the calculation of our calendar year combined ratios.
Three Months Ended | ||||||
March 31, | ||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||
Loss and LAE ratio | 66.8 | % | 73.1 | % | ||
Underwriting and other operating expenses ratio | 21.1 | 20.0 | ||||
Commission expense ratio | 11.7 | 12.0 | ||||
Combined ratio | 99.6 | % | 105.1 | % |
Loss and LAE Ratio. This is the ratio of losses and LAE to net premiums earned. Losses and LAE represents our largest expense item and includes claim payments made, amortization of the Deferred Gain, estimates for future claim payments and changes in those estimates for current and prior periods, and costs associated with investigating, defending, and adjusting claims. The quality of our financial reporting depends in large part on accurately predicting our losses and LAE, which are inherently uncertain as they are estimates of the ultimate cost of individual claims based on actuarial estimation techniques.
Our indemnity claims frequency (the number of claims expressed as a percentage of payroll) has decreased year-over-year; however, our loss experience indicates a slight upward movement in medical and indemnity costs per claim that is reflected in our current accident year loss estimate. We believe our current accident year loss and LAE estimate is adequate; however, ultimate losses will not be known with any certainty for many years.
Our loss and LAE ratio decreased 6.3 percentage points, while our losses and LAE decreased 13.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014. The decrease in the loss and LAE ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014, was primarily due to a decrease in the current accident year loss estimate. The decrease
16
in the dollar amount of losses and LAE was primarily due to the impact of lower net premiums earned and a decrease in the current accident year loss estimate during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014.
Our current accident year loss estimate was 67.7% and 74.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in our current accident year loss estimate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was primarily the result of net rate increases that exceeded anticipated increases in loss costs, as well as a change in the mix of business by state and territory. Prior accident year unfavorable loss development was $1.7 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Prior accident year loss development in both periods was related to our assigned risk business.
Excluding the impact from the LPT Agreement, losses and LAE would have been $109.3 million and $126.6 million, or 68.7% and 75.7% of net premiums earned, for the the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The table below reflects losses and LAE reserve adjustments and the impact of the LPT on net income before taxes.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Prior accident year (unfavorable) loss development, net | $ | (1.7 | ) | $ | (1.8 | ) | ||
Amortization of the Deferred Gain related to losses | 2.4 | 2.9 | ||||||
Amortization of the Deferred Gain related to contingent commission | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||||||
Impact of LPT Reserve Adjustments | — | 0.7 | ||||||
Impact of LPT Contingent Commission Adjustments | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
Total Impact of the LPT | $ | 3.1 | $ | 4.3 |
Underwriting and Other Operating Expenses Ratio. The underwriting and other operating expenses ratio is the ratio of underwriting and other operating expenses to net premiums earned and measures an insurance company's operational efficiency in producing, underwriting, and administering its insurance business.
Underwriting and other operating expenses are those costs that we incur to underwrite and maintain the insurance policies we issue, excluding commission. These expenses include premium taxes and certain other general expenses that vary with, and are primarily related to, producing new or renewal business. Other underwriting expenses include policyholder dividends, changes in estimates of future write-offs of premiums receivable, general administrative expenses such as salaries and benefits, rent, office supplies, depreciation, and all other operating expenses not otherwise classified separately. Policy acquisition costs are variable based on premiums earned; however, other operating costs are more fixed in nature and become a smaller percentage of net premiums earned as premiums increase.
Our underwriting and other operating expenses ratio increased 1.1 percentage points, while our underwriting and other operating expenses increased 0.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014. The increase in the underwriting and other operating expenses ratio was primarily due to a decrease in net premiums earned. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 our bad debt allowance increased $0.6 million and professional services fees increased $0.4 million, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in IT related expenses, compared to the same period of 2014.
Commission Expense Ratio. The commission expense ratio is the ratio of commission expense to net premiums earned and measures the cost of compensating agents and brokers for the business we have underwritten.
Commission expense includes direct commissions to our agents and brokers for the premiums that they produce for us, as well as incentive payments, other marketing costs, and fees.
Our commission expense ratio decreased 0.3 percentage points, while our commission expense decreased 6.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014. This decrease in commission expense was primarily due to lower net premiums earned.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $4.1 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective tax rate was 22.5% and 10.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increased tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to the same period of 2014, was primarily due to an increase in our projected annual net income before taxes.
17
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Parent Company Liquidity
We are a holding company and our ability to fund our operations is contingent upon existing capital and the ability of our insurance subsidiaries' to pay dividends up to the holding company. Payment of dividends by our insurance subsidiaries is restricted by state insurance laws and regulations, including laws establishing minimum solvency and liquidity thresholds. We require cash to pay stockholder dividends, repurchase common stock, make interest and principal payments on our outstanding debt obligations, provide additional surplus to our insurance subsidiaries, and fund our operating expenses.
The holding company had $54.7 million of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and fixed maturity securities maturing within the next 24 months at March 31, 2015. A principal payment of $60 million on our Amended Credit Facility (described below) is payable on December 31, 2015. We believe that the liquidity needs of the holding company over the next 24 months will be met with cash, investments, and dividends from our insurance subsidiaries.
Operating Subsidiaries Liquidity
The primary sources of cash for our insurance operating subsidiaries are funds generated from underwriting operations, investment income, maturities and sales of investments, and capital contributions from the parent holding company. The primary uses of cash are payments of claims and operating expenses, purchases of investments, and payments of dividends to the parent holding company, which are subject to state insurance laws and regulations.
Our insurance subsidiaries had $331.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and fixed maturity securities maturing within the next 24 months at March 31, 2015. We believe that our subsidiaries’ liquidity needs over the next 24 months will be met with cash from operations, investment income, and maturing investments.
We purchase reinsurance to protect us against the costs of severe claims and catastrophic events. On July 1, 2014, we entered into a new reinsurance program that is effective through June 30, 2015. The reinsurance program consists of one treaty covering excess of loss and catastrophic loss events in five layers of coverage. Our reinsurance coverage is $195.0 million in excess of our $5.0 million retention on a per occurrence basis, subject to a $2.0 million annual aggregate deductible and certain exclusions. We believe that our reinsurance program meets our needs and that we are sufficiently capitalized.
Various state laws and regulations require us to hold securities or letters of credit on deposit with certain states in which we do business. Securities having a fair value of $917.3 million and $783.9 million were on deposit at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. These laws and regulations govern both the amount and types of fixed maturity securities that are eligible for deposit. Additionally, certain reinsurance contracts require Company funds to be held in trust for the benefit of the ceding reinsurer to secure the outstanding liabilities we assumed. The fair value of fixed maturity securities held in trust for the benefit of ceding reinsurers was $31.3 million and $31.2 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Sources of Liquidity
We monitor cash flows at both the consolidated and subsidiary levels. We use trend and variance analyses to project future cash needs, making adjustments to our forecasts as appropriate. For additional information regarding our cash flows, see Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The table below shows our net cash flows for the three months ended:
March 31, | ||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in): | ||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 24.8 | $ | 38.6 | ||||
Investing activities | (81.2 | ) | (20.8 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | (1.6 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (58.0 | ) | $ | 16.6 |
Operating Cash Flows. Major components of net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included net premiums received of $171.3 million and investment income received of $21.4 million. These were partially offset by claims payments of $99.5 million (net of $10.5 million recovered from reinsurers), underwriting and other operating expenses paid of $49.6 million (including premium taxes paid of $7.3 million), and commissions paid of $18.7 million.
Major components of net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 included net premiums received of $168.8 million and investment income received of $21.4 million. These were partially offset by claims payments of $91.1 million (net of $8.3 million recovered from reinsurers), underwriting and other operating expenses paid of $41.2 million (including premium taxes paid of $9.3 million), and commissions paid of $18.7 million.
18
Investing Cash Flows. The major components of net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were the purchases of fixed maturity and equity securities, partially offset by proceeds from sales, maturities, and redemptions of investments.
Financing Cash Flows. The majority of cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was related to dividends paid to stockholders.
Capital Resources
Our capital structure is comprised of outstanding debt and stockholders’ equity. As of March 31, 2015, our capital structure consisted of $60.0 million principal balance on our Amended Credit Facility, $32.0 million in surplus notes maturing in 2034, and $913.6 million of stockholders’ equity, including the Deferred Gain. Outstanding debt was 9.1% of total capitalization, including the Deferred Gain, as of March 31, 2015.
Outstanding Debt. In December 2010, we entered into the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo (Amended Credit Facility) under which we were provided with: (a) $100.0 million line of credit through December 31, 2011; (b) $90.0 million line of credit from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012; (c) $80.0 million line of credit from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013; (d) $70.0 million line of credit from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014; and (e) $60.0 million line of credit from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Amounts outstanding bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option: (a) a fluctuating rate of 1.75% above prime rate or (b) a fixed rate that is 1.75% above the LIBOR rate then in effect. The Amended Credit Facility is secured by fixed maturity securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents that had a fair value of $74.0 million and $74.6 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Amended Credit Facility contains customary non-financial covenants and requires us to maintain 5% of the aggregate commitment amount of the line of credit in cash and cash equivalents at all times at the holding company. We are currently in compliance with all applicable covenants.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments. The following table identifies our long-term debt and contractual obligations as of March 31, 2015.
Payment Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than 1-Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | More Than 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases | $ | 11.5 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||
Purchased liabilities | 3.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Notes payable(1) | 120.5 | 62.6 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 52.3 | |||||||||||||||
Capital leases | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | — | |||||||||||||||
Losses and LAE reserves (2)(3) | 2,370.3 | 376.4 | 461.2 | 267.8 | 1,264.9 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations | $ | 2,507.0 | $ | 445.8 | $ | 472.2 | $ | 271.6 | $ | 1,317.4 |
(1) | Notes payable obligations reflect payments for the principal and estimated interest expense based on LIBOR rates plus a margin. The estimated interest expense was based on the contractual obligations of the debt outstanding as of March 31, 2015. The interest rates range from 1.9% to 4.5%. |
(2) | Estimated losses and LAE reserve payment patterns have been computed based on historical information. Our calculation of loss and LAE reserve payments by period is subject to the same uncertainties associated with determining the level of reserves and to the additional uncertainties arising from the difficulty of predicting when claims (including claims that have not yet been reported to us) will be paid. Actual payments of losses and LAE by period will vary, perhaps materially, from the above table to the extent that current estimates of losses and LAE reserves vary from actual ultimate paid claims due to variations between expected and actual payout patterns. |
(3) | The losses and LAE reserves are presented gross of reinsurance recoverables for unpaid losses, which are as follows for each of the periods presented above: |
Recoveries By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Less Than 1-Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | More Than 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reinsurance recoverables for unpaid losses | $ | (663.0 | ) | $ | (33.7 | ) | $ | (63.9 | ) | $ | (59.3 | ) | $ | (506.1 | ) |
Investments
The cost or amortized cost of our investment portfolio was $2.4 billion and the fair value was $2.5 billion as of March 31, 2015.
We employ an investment strategy that emphasizes asset quality and considers the durations of fixed maturity securities against anticipated claim payments and expenditures, other liabilities, and capital needs. Our investment portfolio is structured so that
19
investments mature periodically in reasonable relation to current expectations of future claim payments. Currently, we make claim payments from positive cash flow from operations and use excess cash to invest in operations, invest in marketable securities, return capital to our stockholders, and fund growth.
As of March 31, 2015, our investment portfolio, which is classified as available-for-sale, consisted of 92.9% fixed maturity securities whose fair values may fluctuate due to interest rate changes. We strive to limit interest rate risk by managing the duration of our fixed maturity securities. Our fixed maturity securities (excluding cash and cash equivalents) had a duration of 4.1 at March 31, 2015. To minimize interest rate risk, our portfolio is weighted toward short-term and intermediate-term bonds; however, our investment strategy balances consideration of duration, yield, and credit risk. Our investment guidelines require that the minimum weighted average quality of our fixed maturity securities portfolio be "AA-." Our fixed maturity securities portfolio had a weighted average quality of "AA" as of March 31, 2015, with 58.9% of the portfolio rated "AA" or better, based on market value.
We carry our portfolio of equity securities on our balance sheet at fair value. We minimize our exposure to equity price risk by investing primarily in the equity securities of mid-to-large capitalization issuers and by diversifying our equity holdings across several industry sectors. Equity securities represented 6.8% of our investment portfolio at March 31, 2015.
Given current economic uncertainty and continuing market volatility, we believe that our current asset allocation best meets our strategy to preserve capital for policyholders, to provide sufficient income to support insurance operations, and to effectively grow book value over a long-term investment horizon.
The following table shows the estimated fair value, the percentage of the fair value to total invested assets, the average book yield, and the average tax equivalent yield based on the fair value of each category of invested assets as of March 31, 2015.
Category | Estimated Fair Value | Percentage of Total | Book Yield | Tax Equivalent Yield | |||||||||
(in millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 160.4 | 6.3 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.0 | % | |||||
U.S. Agencies | 38.5 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | |||||||||
States and municipalities | 813.4 | 32.0 | 3.4 | 5.0 | |||||||||
Corporate securities | 914.7 | 36.0 | 3.1 | 3.1 | |||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 294.3 | 11.6 | 3.3 | 3.3 | |||||||||
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | 71.2 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 67.6 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |||||||||
Equity securities | 172.6 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 5.8 | |||||||||
Short-term investments | $ | 9.0 | 0.3 | % | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||||
Total | $ | 2,541.7 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Weighted average yield | 3.1 | % | 3.8 | % |
The following table shows the percentage of total estimated fair value of our fixed maturity securities as of March 31, 2015 by credit rating category, using the lower of ratings assigned by Moody's Investor Services and/or Standard & Poor's.
Rating | Percentage of Total Estimated Fair Value | ||
“AAA” | 9.6 | % | |
“AA” | 49.3 | ||
“A” | 29.2 | ||
“BBB” | 11.7 | ||
Below investment grade | 0.2 | ||
Total | 100.0 | % |
Investments that we currently own could be subject to default by the issuer or could suffer declines in fair value that become other-than-temporary. We regularly assess individual securities as part of our ongoing portfolio management, including the identification of other-than-temporary declines in fair value. Our other-than-temporary impairment assessment includes reviewing the extent and duration of declines in the fair value of investments below amortized cost, historical and projected financial performance and near-term prospects of the issuer, the outlook for industry sectors, credit rating, and macro-economic changes. We also make a determination as to whether it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its fair value recovers above cost, or maturity.
Based on our reviews of fixed maturity and equity securities, we believe that we appropriately identified the declines in the fair values of our unrealized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2015. We determined that the unrealized losses on fixed
20
maturity securities were primarily the result of prevailing interest rates and not the credit quality of the issuers. The fixed maturity securities whose fair value was less than amortized cost were not determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired given the severity and duration of the impairment, the credit quality of the issuers, the Company’s intent to not sell the securities, and a determination that it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities until fair value recovers to above cost, or maturity.
Based on reviews of the equity securities for the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company determined that the unrealized losses as of that date were not considered to be other-than-temporary due to the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include amounts based on the use of estimates and judgments of management for those transactions that are not yet complete. We believe that the estimates and judgments that were most critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements involved the following: (a) reserves for losses and LAE; (b) reinsurance recoverables; (c) recognition of premium income; (d) deferred income taxes; (e) valuation of investments; and (f) goodwill and intangible asset impairment. These estimates and judgments require the use of assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and therefore are subject to change as facts and circumstances develop. Our accounting policies are discussed under "Critical Accounting Policies" in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of potential economic loss principally arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. The major components of market risk affecting us are credit risk, interest rate risk, and equity price risk, and are described in detail in our Annual Report. We have not experienced any material changes in market risk since December 31, 2014.
The primary market risk exposure to our investment portfolio, which consists primarily of fixed maturity securities, is interest rate risk. We have the ability to hold fixed maturity securities to maturity and we strive to limit interest rate risk by managing duration. As of March 31, 2015, our fixed maturity securities portfolio had a duration of 4.1. We continually monitor the impact of interest rate changes on our investment portfolio and liquidity obligations. Changes to our market risk, if any, since December 31, 2014 are reflected in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
21
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time-to-time, the Company is involved in pending and threatened litigation in the normal course of business in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. In the opinion of management, the ultimate liability, if any, arising from such pending or threatened litigation is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations, liquidity, or financial position.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We have disclosed in our Annual Report the most significant risk factors that can impact year-to-year comparisons and that may affect the future performance of the Company’s business. On a quarterly basis, we review these disclosures and update the risk factors, as appropriate. As of the date of this report, there have been no material changes to the risk factors contained in our Annual Report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Incorporated by Reference Herein | ||||||||||
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit | Included Herewith | Form | Exhibit | Filing Date | |||||
10.1 | Form of Performance Share Agreement | X | ||||||||
10.2 | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement | X | ||||||||
10.3 | Form of Stock Option Agreement | X | ||||||||
31.1 | Certification of Douglas D. Dirks Pursuant to Section 302 | X | ||||||||
31.2 | Certification of Terry Eleftheriou Pursuant to Section 302 | X | ||||||||
32.1 | Certification of Douglas D. Dirks Pursuant to Section 906 | X | ||||||||
32.2 | Certification of Terry Eleftheriou Pursuant to Section 906 | X | ||||||||
*101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | X | ||||||||
*101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | X | ||||||||
*101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||
*101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||
*101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | X | ||||||||
*101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | X |
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
EMPLOYERS HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: | April 30, 2015 | /s/ Douglas D. Dirks |
Douglas D. Dirks | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Employers Holdings, Inc. |
Date: | April 30, 2015 | /s/ Terry Eleftheriou |
Terry Eleftheriou | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Employers Holdings, Inc. | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
23