ENB Financial Corp - Quarter Report: 2015 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________________ to _________________________

ENB Financial Corp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	000-53297	51-0661129
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No)


31 E. Main St., Ephrata, PA	17522-0457
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (717) 733-4181

Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report Not Applicable

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of August 7, 2015, the registrant had 2,854,302 shares of $0.20 (par) Common Stock outstanding.

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2015

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and 2014 and December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)		3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)		4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)		5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)		6

	Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements		7-33

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	34-67

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	68-72

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	73



Part II – OTHER INFORMATION			74

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	74

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	74

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	74

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	74

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	74

	Item 5.	Other Information	74

	Item 6.	Exhibits	75


SIGNATURE PAGE			76

EXHIBIT INDEX			77

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
	2015			2014			2014
	$			$			$
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks		12,497			16,727			14,663
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		24,469			26,685			30,358

Total cash and cash equivalents		36,966			43,412			45,021

Securities available for sale (at fair value)		296,059			295,822			307,797

Loans held for sale		1,294			506			108

Loans (net of unearned income)		484,803			471,168			448,150

Less: Allowance for loan losses		7,249			7,141			6,968

Net loans		477,554			464,027			441,182

Premises and equipment		22,045			22,447			22,606
Regulatory stock		4,037			3,227			4,034
Bank owned life insurance		23,449			20,603			20,239
Other assets		8,284			7,164			9,475

Total assets		869,688			857,208			850,462

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing		207,826			210,444			183,149
Interest-bearing		494,724			489,207			500,552

Total deposits		702,550			699,651			683,701

Short-term borrowings		4,930			—			5,410
Long-term debt		67,094			62,300			69,150
Other liabilities		2,408			2,490			2,586

Total liabilities		776,982			764,441			760,847

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $0.20;
Shares: Authorized 12,000,000
Issued 2,869,557 and Outstanding 2,853,869
(Issued 2,869,557 and Outstanding 2,856,836 as of 12/31/14)
(Issued 2,869,557 and Outstanding 2,856,993 as of 6/30/14)		574			574			574
Capital surplus		4,388			4,375			4,361
Retained earnings		88,721			87,200			85,229
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(481	)		1,002			(189	)
Less: Treasury stock cost on 15,688 shares (12,721 shares
as of 12/31/14 and 12,564 shares as of 6/30/14)		(496	)		(384	)		(360	)

Total stockholders' equity		92,706			92,767			89,615

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		869,688			857,208			850,462

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

	Three Months ended June 30,					Six Months ended June 30,
	2015		2014			2015		2014
	$		$			$		$
Interest and dividend income:
Interest and fees on loans		5,026		4,817			9,975		9,596
Interest on securities available for sale
Taxable		804		1,063			1,804		2,222
Tax-exempt		805		849			1,571		1,720
Interest on deposits at other banks		19		19			33		27
Dividend income		64		77			207		132

Total interest and dividend income		6,718		6,825			13,590		13,697

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		610		777			1,284		1,566
Interest on borrowings		341		440			681		868

Total interest expense		951		1,217			1,965		2,434

Net interest income		5,767		5,608			11,625		11,263

Provision (credit) for loan losses		100		(100	)		300		(300	)

Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses		5,667		5,708			11,325		11,563

Other income:
Trust and investment services income		316		285			671		650
Service fees		485		424			886		814
Commissions		503		494			968		960
Gains on securities transactions, net		600		582			1,161		1,267
Impairment losses on securities:
Impairment gains on investment securities		—		—			—		15
Non-credit related losses on securities not expected
to be sold in other comprehensive income before tax		—		—			—		(37	)
Net impairment losses on investment securities		—		—			—		(22	)
Gains on sale of mortgages		236		92			389		130
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		174		159			334		314
Other income		80		132			186		235

Total other income		2,394		2,168			4,595		4,348

Operating expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		3,674		3,481			7,376		6,911
Occupancy		524		459			1,078		975
Equipment		298		268			566		528
Advertising & marketing		161		125			317		255
Computer software & data processing		384		396			758		795
Shares tax		195		183			391		366
Professional services		437		353			754		680
Other expense		514		524			1,097		1,077

Total operating expenses		6,187		5,789			12,337		11,587

Income before income taxes		1,874		2,087			3,583		4,324

Provision for federal income taxes		278		347			521		746

Net income		1,596		1,740			3,062		3,578

Earnings per share of common stock		0.56		0.61			1.07		1.25

Cash dividends paid per share		0.27		0.27			0.54		0.53

Weighted average shares outstanding		2,852,353		2,854,878			2,854,804		2,854,498

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months ended June 30,						Six Months ended June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	$			$			$			$

Net income		1,596			1,740			3,062			3,578

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net change in unrealized gains:

Other-than-temporarily impaired securities available for sale:

Gains arising during the period		—			—			—			15
Income tax effect		—			—			—			(5	)
		—			—			—			10

Losses recognized in earnings		—			—			—			22
Income tax effect		—			—			—			(7	)
		—			—			—			15
Unrealized holding gains on other-than-temporarily impaired
securities available for sale, net of tax		—			—			—			25

Securities available for sale not other-than-temporarily impaired:

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period		(3,403	)		2,972			(1,086	)		6,912
Income tax effect		1,157			(1,010	)		369			(2,350	)
		(2,246	)		1,962			(717	)		4,562

Gains recognized in earnings		(600	)		(582	)		(1,161	)		(1,267	)
Income tax effect		204			198			395			431
		(396	)		(384	)		(766	)		(836	)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale not
other-than-temporarily impaired, net of tax		(2,642	)		1,578			(1,483	)		3,726

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(2,642	)		1,578			(1,483	)		3,751

Comprehensive Income (Loss)		(1,046	)		3,318			1,579			7,329

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
	$			$
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		3,062			3,578
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts and loan fees		2,844			2,268
Increase in interest receivable		(15	)		(161	)
Decrease in interest payable		(64	)		(14	)
Provision (credit) for loan losses		300			(300	)
Gains on securities transactions, net		(1,161	)		(1,267	)
Impairment losses on securities		—			22
Gains on sale of mortgages		(389	)		(130	)
Loans originated for sale		(12,961	)		(4,266	)
Proceeds from sales of loans		12,562			4,347
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		(334	)		(314	)
(Gain)/Loss on sale of other real estate owned		20			(9	)
Depreciation of premises and equipment and amortization of software		765			719
Deferred income tax		(50	)		309
Other assets and other liabilities, net		(220	)		(2,127	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,359			2,655

Cash flows from investing activities:
Securities available for sale:
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and repayments		31,750			14,613
Proceeds from sales		76,539			69,513
Purchases		(112,363	)		(86,877	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		122			48
Purchase of regulatory bank stock		(942	)		(685	)
Redemptions of regulatory bank stock		132			311
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance		(2,512	)		(14	)
Net increase in loans		(14,059	)		(9,995	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(316	)		(261	)
Purchase of computer software		(139	)		(109	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(21,788	)		(13,456	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in demand, NOW, and savings accounts		10,953			27,329
Net decrease in time deposits		(8,054	)		(254	)
Net increase in short-term borrowings		4,930			1,510
Proceeds from long-term debt		12,794			9,150
Repayments of long-term debt		(8,000	)		(5,000	)
Dividends paid		(1,541	)		(1,514	)
Treasury stock sold		257			239
Treasury stock purchased		(356	)		(215	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		10,983			31,245
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(6,446	)		20,444
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		43,412			24,577
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		36,966			45,021

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid		2,029			2,448
Income taxes paid		445			250

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Net transfer of other real estate owned from loans		137			56
Fair value adjustments for securities available for sale		(2,249	)		5,683

See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

1.	Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and to general practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all significant adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s reporting format. Such reclassifications did not affect net income or stockholders’ equity.

ENB Financial Corp (“the Corporation”) is the bank holding company for its wholly-owned subsidiary Ephrata National Bank (the “Bank”). This Form 10-Q, for the second quarter of 2015, is reporting on the results of operations and financial condition of ENB Financial Corp.

Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2015. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in ENB Financial Corp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

2.	Securities Available for Sale

The amortized cost and fair value of securities held at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, are as follows:

			Gross		Gross
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	$		$		$			$
June 30, 2015
U.S. government agencies		34,568		5		(306	)		34,267
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		39,263		119		(323	)		39,059
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		60,728		341		(669	)		60,400
Corporate bonds		60,684		77		(452	)		60,309
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		96,028		1,637		(1,188	)		96,477
Total debt securities		291,271		2,179		(2,938	)		290,512
Marketable equity securities		5,517		34		(4	)		5,547
Total securities available for sale		296,788		2,213		(2,942	)		296,059

December 31, 2014
U.S. government agencies		46,577		110		(528	)		46,159
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		37,946		138		(134	)		37,950
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		48,690		55		(679	)		48,066
Corporate bonds		65,274		145		(311	)		65,108
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		90,628		2,961		(258	)		93,331
Total debt securities		289,115		3,409		(1,910	)		290,614
Marketable equity securities		5,189		19		—			5,208
Total securities available for sale		294,304		3,428		(1,910	)		295,822

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available for sale at June 30, 2015, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to certain call or prepayment provisions.

CONTRACTUAL MATURITY OF DEBT SECURITIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
	Amortized
	Cost		Fair Value
	$		$
Due in one year or less		21,498		21,431
Due after one year through five years		105,917		105,402
Due after five years through ten years		73,700		73,439
Due after ten years		90,156		90,240
Total debt securities		291,271		290,512

Securities available for sale with a par value of $73,680,000 and $75,013,000 at June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively, were pledged or restricted for public funds, borrowings, or other purposes as required by law. The fair value of these pledged securities was $78,488,000 at June 30, 2015, and $78,269,000 at December 31, 2014.

Proceeds from active sales of securities available for sale, along with the associated gross realized gains and gross realized losses, are shown below. Realized gains and losses are computed on the basis of specific identification.

PROCEEDS FROM SALES OF SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	$		$		$		$
Proceeds from sales		36,304		28,253		76,539		69,513
Gross realized gains		644		777		1,253		1,751
Gross realized losses		44		195		92		484

SUMMARY OF GAINS AND LOSSES ON SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	$		$		$		$
Gross realized gains		644		777		1,253		1,751

Gross realized losses		44		195		92		484
Impairment on securities		—		—		—		22
Total gross realized losses		44		195		92		506

Net gains on securities		600		582		1,161		1,245

The bottom portion of the above table shows the net gains on security transactions, including any impairment taken on securities held by the Corporation. The net gain or loss from security transactions is also reflected on the Corporation’s Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Management evaluates all of the Corporation’s securities for other than temporary impairment (OTTI) on a periodic basis. Prior to June 30, 2014, the Corporation had a small number of private collateralized mortgage obligations (PCMOs) of which all but one had impairment recorded at some point in the past. During the second quarter of 2014, the three PCMOs remaining in the Corporation’s securities portfolio were sold. No other securities in the portfolio had other-than-temporary impairment recorded in 2014 or 2015.

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:

TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF SECURITIES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Less than 12 months					More than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	$		$			$		$			$		$
As of June 30, 2015
U.S. government agencies		18,060		(196	)		3,905		(110	)		21,965		(306	)
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		17,914		(216	)		2,683		(107	)		20,597		(323	)
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		22,198		(458	)		8,935		(211	)		31,133		(669	)
Corporate bonds		35,675		(424	)		3,181		(28	)		38,856		(452	)
Obligations of states & political subdivisions		34,360		(934	)		8,499		(254	)		42,859		(1,188	)

Total debt securities		128,207		(2,228	)		27,203		(710	)		155,410		(2,938	)

Marketable equity securities		107		(4	)		—		—			107		(4	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		128,314		(2,232	)		27,203		(710	)		155,517		(2,942	)

As of December 31, 2014
U.S. government agencies		9,676		(30	)		19,689		(498	)		29,365		(528	)
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		7,412		(18	)		5,412		(116	)		12,824		(134	)
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		25,314		(403	)		11,222		(276	)		36,536		(679	)
Corporate bonds		33,413		(227	)		9,855		(84	)		43,268		(311	)
Obligations of states & political subdivisions		2,710		(29	)		16,720		(229	)		19,430		(258	)

Total temporarily impaired securities		78,525		(707	)		62,898		(1,203	)		141,423		(1,910	)

In the debt security portfolio there were 122 positions that were carrying unrealized losses as of June 30, 2015. In the equity security portfolio there were three positions that were carrying unrealized losses as of June 30, 2015. There were no instruments considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015.

The Corporation evaluates both equity and fixed maturity positions for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic and market concerns warrant such evaluation. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles provide for the bifurcation of OTTI into two categories: (a) the amount of the total OTTI related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss), which is recognized in earnings, and (b) the amount of total OTTI related to all other factors, which is recognized, net of taxes, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. This accounting treatment was only applicable to two of the Corporation’s PCMOs in the first quarter of 2014, but both of those securities were sold in the second quarter of 2014, resulting in no further impairment charges.

The prior impairment on the PCMOs was a result of a deterioration of expected cash flows on those securities due to higher projected credit losses than the amount of credit protection carried by those securities. Specifically, the foreclosure and severity rates had been running at levels where expected principal losses were in excess of the remaining credit protection on those instruments. The projected principal losses were based on prepayment speeds that were equal to or slower than the actual last twelve-month prepayment speeds the particular securities had experienced. Every quarter prior to the second quarter of 2014, management evaluated third-party reporting that showed projected principal losses based on various prepayment speed and severity rate scenarios. Based on the assumption that all loans over 60 days delinquent would default and at a severity rate equal to or above that previously experienced, and based on historical and expected prepayment speeds, management determined that it was appropriate to take an additional $22,000 of impairment on one PCMO in the first quarter of 2014. Because all of the remaining PCMOs were sold in the second quarter of 2014, no further impairment was recorded on these bonds in 2014 and future impairment analysis will cease for this segment since it was completely sold off.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following tables reflect the amortized cost, market value, and unrealized loss as of June 30, 2014, on the PCMO securities held which had impairment taken in the year. There were no impairment charges in 2015 since all of the PCMO securities were sold during 2014. In 2014, there was one PCMO that had impairment taken during the first quarter prior to the sale of the remaining PCMO portfolio. The values shown below are after the Corporation recorded year-to-date impairment charges of $22,000 through June 30, 2014. The $22,000 was deemed to be a credit loss and was the amount that management expected the principal losses would be by the time the securities matured. Because all of the remaining PCMO securities were sold during the second quarter of 2014, there are no temporary market value losses remaining at June 30, 2015.

SECURITY IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	As of June 30, 2014
	Book		Market		Unrealized		Impairment
	Value		Value		Loss		Charge
	$		$		$		$

Impaired private collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—		—		(22	)

The following table provides a cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized in earnings for debt securities held:

CREDIT LOSSES RECOGNIZED IN EARNINGS ON DEBT SECURITIES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015		2014			2015		2014
	$		$			$		$

Beginning balance		—		1,170			—		1,148

Credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-
temporary impairment has not been previously recognized		—		—			—		—

Additional credit losses on debt securities for which other-
than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		—		—			—		22

Sale of debt securities with previously recognized impairment		—		(1,170	)		—		(1,170	)

Ending balance		—		—			—		—

With the sale of the remaining PCMO portfolio during the second quarter of 2014, there are no remaining impairment balances as of June 30, 2015.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

3.	Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table presents the Corporation’s loan portfolio by category of loans as of June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

LOAN PORTFOLIO

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2015			2014
	$			$
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		95,009			95,914
Agriculture mortgages		150,380			140,322
Construction		7,823			7,387
Total commercial real estate		253,212			243,623

Consumer real estate (a)
1-4 family residential mortgages		122,642			123,395
Home equity loans		12,007			12,563
Home equity lines of credit		30,482			27,308
Total consumer real estate		165,131			163,266

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		33,046			31,998
Tax-free loans		12,843			11,806
Agriculture loans		16,455			16,496
Total commercial and industrial		62,344			60,300

Consumer		3,606			3,517

Gross loans prior to deferred fees		484,293			470,706
Less:
Deferred loan costs, net		(510	)		(462	)
Allowance for loan losses		7,249			7,141
Total net loans		477,554			464,027

(a)	Real estate loans serviced for others, which are not included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, totaled $26,631,000 and $16,670,000 as of June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

The Corporation grades commercial credits differently than consumer credits. The following tables represent all of the Corporation’s commercial credit exposures by internally assigned grades as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The grading analysis estimates the capability of the borrower to repay the contractual obligations under the loan agreements as scheduled. The Corporation's internal commercial credit risk grading system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans.

The Corporation's internally assigned grades for commercial credits are as follows:

Pass – loans which are protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the underlying collateral.

Special Mention – loans where a potential weakness or risk exists, which could cause a more serious problem if not corrected.

Substandard – loans that have a well-defined weakness based on objective evidence and characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Doubtful – loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard asset. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, based on existing circumstances.

Loss – loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible, or of such value that continuance as an asset is not warranted.

COMMERCIAL CREDIT EXPOSURE

CREDIT RISK PROFILE BY INTERNALLY ASSIGNED GRADE

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

June 30, 2015	Commercial Mortgages		Agriculture Mortgages		Construction		Commercial and Industrial		Tax-free Loans		Agriculture Loans		Total
	$		$		$		$		$		$		$
Grade:
Pass		88,461		147,490		6,535		32,117		10,396		16,271		301,270
Special Mention		908		858		—		56		2,447		27		4,296
Substandard		5,640		2,032		1,288		873		—		157		9,990
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total		95,009		150,380		7,823		33,046		12,843		16,455		315,556

December 31, 2014	Commercial Mortgages		Agriculture Mortgages		Construction		Commercial and Industrial		Tax-free Loans		Agriculture Loans		Total
	$		$		$		$		$		$		$
Grade:
Pass		82,478		135,298		5,350		31,006		11,806		16,255		282,193
Special Mention		2,649		3,237		—		29		—		29		5,944
Substandard		10,787		1,787		2,037		963		—		212		15,786
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total		95,914		140,322		7,387		31,998		11,806		16,496		303,923

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

For consumer loans, the Corporation evaluates credit quality based on whether the loan is considered performing or non-performing. Non-performing loans consist of those loans greater than 90 days delinquent and nonaccrual loans. The following tables present the balances of consumer loans by classes of the loan portfolio based on payment performance as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

CONSUMER CREDIT EXPOSURE

CREDIT RISK PROFILE BY PAYMENT PERFORMANCE

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

June 30, 2015	1-4 Family Residential Mortgages		Home Equity Loans		Home Equity Lines of Credit		Consumer		Total
Payment performance:	$		$		$		$		$

Performing		122,255		12,007		30,482		3,603		168,347
Non-performing		387		—		—		3		390

Total		122,642		12,007		30,482		3,606		168,737

December 31, 2014	1-4 Family Residential Mortgages		Home Equity Loans		Home Equity Lines of Credit		Consumer		Total
Payment performance:	$		$		$		$		$

Performing		123,023		12,551		27,308		3,517		166,399
Non-performing		372		12		—		—		384

Total		123,395		12,563		27,308		3,517		166,783

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following tables present an age analysis of the Corporation’s past due loans, segregated by loan portfolio class, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

AGING OF LOANS RECEIVABLE

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

													Loans
					Greater								Receivable >
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		than 90		Total Past				Total Loans		90 Days and
June 30, 2015	Past Due		Past Due		Days		Due		Current		Receivable		Accruing
	$		$		$		$		$		$		$
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		130		181		—		311		94,698		95,009		—
Agriculture mortgages		—		—		—		—		150,380		150,380		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		7,823		7,823		—
Consumer real estate
1-4 family residential mortgages		817		33		387		1,237		121,405		122,642		387
Home equity loans		46		—		—		46		11,961		12,007		—
Home equity lines of credit		—		—		—		—		30,482		30,482		—
Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		18		—		56		74		32,972		33,046		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		12,843		12,843		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		16,455		16,455		—
Consumer		12		17		3		32		3,574		3,606		3
Total		1,023		231		446		1,700		482,593		484,293		390

													Loans
					Greater								Receivable >
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		than 90		Total Past				Total Loans		90 Days and
December 31, 2014	Past Due		Past Due		Days		Due		Current		Receivable		Accruing
	$		$		$		$		$		$		$
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		—		189		266		455		95,459		95,914		—
Agriculture mortgages		—		—		—		—		140,322		140,322		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		7,387		7,387		—
Consumer real estate
1-4 family residential mortgages		665		349		372		1,386		122,009		123,395		372
Home equity loans		78		14		12		104		12,459		12,563		12
Home equity lines of credit		13		—		—		13		27,295		27,308		—
Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		21		73		—		94		31,904		31,998		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		11,806		11,806		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		16,496		16,496		—
Consumer		23		1		—		24		3,493		3,517		—
Total		800		626		650		2,076		468,630		470,706		384

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

NONACCRUAL LOANS BY LOAN CLASS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	$		$

Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		465		894
Agriculture mortgages		—		—
Construction		—		—
Consumer real estate
1-4 family residential mortgages		—		—
Home equity loans		—		—
Home equity lines of credit		—		—
Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		56		73
Tax-free loans		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—
Consumer		—		—
Total		521		967

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, all of the Corporation’s commercial loans on nonaccrual status were also considered impaired. Information with respect to impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, is as follows:

IMPAIRED LOANS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	$		$		$		$

Average recorded balance of impaired loans		1,920		2,580		2,043		2,617
Interest income recognized on impaired loans		21		27		45		55

Interest income on impaired loans would have increased by approximately $6,000 and $13,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $10,000 and $22,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, had these loans performed in accordance with their original terms.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, there were no loan modifications made that would cause a loan to be considered a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). A TDR is a loan where management has granted a concession to the borrower from the original terms. A concession is generally defined as more favorable payment or credit terms granted to a borrower in an effort to improve the likelihood of the lender collecting principal in its entirety. Concessions usually are in the form of interest only for a period of time, or a lower interest rate offered in an effort to enable the borrower to continue to make normally scheduled payments.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following tables summarize information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014:

IMPAIRED LOAN ANALYSIS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

June 30, 2015	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	$		$		$		$		$

With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		465		1,038		—		607		—
Agriculture mortgages		1,360		1,360		—		1,375		43
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		1,825		2,398		—		1,982		43

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		56		62		—		61		2
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		56		62		—		61		2

Total with no related allowance		1,881		2,460		—		2,043		45

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture mortgages		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—

Total with a related allowance		—		—		—		—		—

Total by loan class:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		465		1,038		—		607		—
Agriculture mortgages		1,360		1,360		—		1,375		43
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		1,825		2,398		—		1,982		43

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		56		62		—		61		2
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		56		62		—		61		2

Total		1,881		2,460		—		2,043		45

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

IMPAIRED LOAN ANALYSIS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

December 31, 2014	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	$		$		$		$		$

With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		745		931		—		931		—
Agriculture mortgages		1,391		1,391		—		1,539		104
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		2,136		2,322		—		2,470		104

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		73		73		—		86		6
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		73		73		—		86		6

Total with no related allowance		2,209		2,395		—		2,556		110

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		149		264		1		68		—
Agriculture mortgages		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		149		264		1		68		—

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—

Total with a related allowance		149		264		1		68		—

Total by loan class:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		894		1,195		1		999		—
Agriculture mortgages		1,391		1,391		—		1,539		104
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		2,285		2,586		1		2,538		104

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		73		73		—		86		6
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		73		73		—		86		6

Total		2,358		2,659		1		2,624		110

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

IMPAIRED LOAN ANALYSIS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

June 30, 2014	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	$		$		$		$		$

With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		888		985		—		940		—
Agriculture mortgages		1,569		1,569		—		1,580		55
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		2,457		2,554		—		2,520		55

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		81		81		—		97		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		81		81		—		97		—

Total with no related allowance		2,538		2,635		—		2,617		55

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture mortgages		—		—		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		—

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		—		—		—		—		—

Total with a related allowance		—		—		—		—		—

Total by loan class:
Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		888		985		—		940		—
Agriculture mortgages		1,569		1,569		—		1,580		55
Construction		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial real estate		2,457		2,554		—		2,520		55

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		81		81		—		97		—
Tax-free loans		—		—		—		—		—
Agriculture loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total commercial and industrial		81		81		—		97		—

Total		2,538		2,635		—		2,617		55

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Commercial Real Estate			Consumer Real Estate			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
	$			$			$			$			$			$
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance - December 31, 2014		3,834			1,367			1,301			66			573			7,141

Charge-offs		(272	)		—			—			(1	)		—			(273	)
Recoveries		2			—			70			—			—			72
Provision		623			(283	)		(147	)		(11	)		18			200

Balance - March 31, 2015		4,187			1,084			1,224			54			591			7,140

Charge-offs		—			—			(2	)		(3	)		—			(5	)
Recoveries		1			—			11			2			—			14
Provision		(29	)		(20	)		157			22			(30	)		100

Ending Balance - June 30, 2015		4,159			1,064			1,390			75			561			7,249

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, provision expense was recorded for the commercial real estate segment with minimal provisions or credit provisions recorded in all other loan categories. There were $272,000 of commercial real estate loan charge-offs during the first quarter of 2015, which increased the historical loss rates and ultimately resulted in a higher required reserve amount for the commercial real estate category. Qualitative factors have been shifting, with more factors declining than increasing. The consumer real estate area had declines in five of nine qualitative factors resulting in a lower required provision. To a lesser degree, the historic loss experience on commercial and industrial loans has been very favorable with more recoveries than charge-offs and two qualitative factors were reduced, resulting in a lower required provision. The consumer loan area saw three qualitative factors reduced with one increased, resulting in a lower required provision on a much smaller loan amount. The higher commercial real estate loan charge-offs and loan growth during the first quarter of 2015 overshadowed the reduction in provisions in the other areas, resulting in a higher total provision required through June 30, 2015.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended June 30, 2014:

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Commercial Real Estate			Consumer Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
	$			$		$			$			$			$
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance - December 31, 2013		3,657			1,346		1,416			102			698			7,219

Charge-offs		—			—		—			(15	)		—			(15	)
Recoveries		4			5		43			—			—			52
Provision		(150	)		51		(117	)		17			(1	)		(200	)(1)

Balance - March 31, 2014		3,511			1,402		1,342			104			697			7,056

Charge-offs		—			—		—			—			—			—
Recoveries		3			—		9			—			—			12
Provision		(106	)		44		12			(24	)		(26	)		(100	)(1)

Ending Balance - June 30, 2014		3,408			1,446		1,363			80			671			6,968

(1)

The Corporation recognized a $200,000 credit provision in the first quarter of 2014 and a $100,000 credit provision in the second quarter of 2014 as a result of lower levels of substandard loans, and continued low levels of total classified loans, impaired loans, non-accrual loans, recoveries in excess of charge-offs, continuing declines in historic loss ratio, and improving qualitative factors.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, credit provisions were recorded for the commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and consumer loan categories while there was provision expense required for the consumer real estate loan category. There had been no commercial loan charge-offs during the past year, which reduced the historical loss rates and ultimately resulted in a lower required reserve amount for the commercial loan categories. Qualitative factors have been shifting, with some increasing and some decreasing, but overall, qualitative factors across the board have been declining. Conversely, factors in the allowance calculation related to consumer real estate were increased in the first half of 2014 as a result of the mortgage initiative and focus on increasing volume in this area.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for credit losses and the recorded investment in loans receivable by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND RECORDED INVESTMENT IN LOANS RECEIVABLE

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

As of June 30, 2015:	Commercial Real Estate		Consumer Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	$		$		$		$		$		$
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance: individually evaluated
for impairment		—		—		—		—		—		—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated
for impairment		4,159		1,064		1,390		75		561		7,249

Loans receivable:
Ending balance		253,212		165,131		62,344		3,606				484,293
Ending balance: individually evaluated
for impairment		1,825		—		56		—				1,881
Ending balance: collectively evaluated
for impairment		251,387		165,131		62,288		3,606				482,412

As of December 31, 2014:	Commercial Real Estate		Consumer Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
	$		$		$		$		$		$
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance: individually evaluated
for impairment		1		—		—		—		—		1
Ending balance: collectively evaluated
for impairment		3,833		1,367		1,301		66		573		7,140

Loans receivable:
Ending balance		243,623		163,266		60,300		3,517				470,706
Ending balance: individually evaluated
for impairment		2,285		—		73		—				2,358
Ending balance: collectively evaluated
for impairment		241,338		163,266		60,227		3,517				468,348

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

4. Fair Value Presentation

U.S. generally accepted accounting principles establish a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of observable pricing utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. The three broad levels defined by the hierarchy are as follows:

Level I:

Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level II:

Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level III:

Assets and liabilities that have little to no observable pricing as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

The following tables present the assets reported on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as of June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014, by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Fair Value Measurements:

ASSETS MEASURED ON A RECURRING BASIS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30, 2015
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
	$		$		$		$

U.S. government agencies		—		34,267		—		34,267
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		—		39,059		—		39,059
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		—		60,400		—		60,400
Corporate bonds		—		60,309		—		60,309
Obligations of states & political subdivisions		—		96,477		—		96,477
Marketable equity securities		5,547		—		—		5,547

Total securities		5,547		290,512		—		296,059

On June 30, 2015, the Corporation held no securities valued using level III inputs. All of the Corporation’s debt instruments were valued using level II inputs, where quoted prices are available and observable, but not necessarily quotes on identical securities traded in active markets on a daily basis. The Corporation’s CRA fund investments and bank stocks are fair valued utilizing level I inputs because the funds have their own quoted prices in an active market. As of June 30, 2015, the CRA fund investments had a $5,000,000 book and fair market value and the bank stock portfolio had a book value of $517,000, and fair market value of $547,000.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Fair Value Measurements:

ASSETS MEASURED ON A RECURRING BASIS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	December 31, 2014
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
	$		$		$		$

U.S. government agencies		—		46,159		—		46,159
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		—		37,950		—		37,950
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		—		48,066		—		48,066
Corporate bonds		—		65,108		—		65,108
Obligations of states & political subdivisions		—		93,331		—		93,331
Marketable equity securities		5,208		—		—		5,208

Total securities		5,208		290,614		—		295,822

On December 31, 2014, the Corporation held no securities valued using level III inputs. All of the Corporation’s debt instruments were valued using level II inputs, where quoted prices are available and observable but not necessarily quotes on identical securities traded in active markets on a daily basis. As of December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s CRA fund investments had a book and fair market value of $5,000,000 and the bank stock portfolio had a book value of $189,000 and a market value of $208,000 utilizing level I pricing.

Financial instruments are considered level III when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for level III financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Level III financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. There were no level III securities as of June 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

The following tables present the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, by level within the fair value hierarchy:

ASSETS MEASURED ON A NONRECURRING BASIS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	June 30, 2015
	Level I $		Level II $		Level III $		Total $
Assets:
Impaired Loans		—		—		1,881		1,881
OREO		—		—		64		64
Total		—		—		1,945		1,945

	December 31, 2014
	Level I $		Level II $		Level III $		Total $
Assets:
Impaired Loans		—		—		2,357		2,357
OREO		—		—		69		69
Total		—		—		2,426		2,426

The Corporation had a total of $1,881,000 of impaired loans as of June 30, 2015, with no specific allocation against these loans and $2,358,000 of impaired loans as of December 31, 2014, with $1,000 of specifically allocated allowance against these loans. The value of impaired loans is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Other real estate owned (OREO) is measured at fair value, less estimated costs to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management. The Corporation’s OREO balance consisted of one residential property that was classified as OREO as of June 30, 2015, and a different residential property that was classified as OREO as of December 31, 2014, and sold prior to June 30, 2015. Management has estimated the current value of the OREO property held at June 30, 2015, at $64,000 utilizing level III pricing. Income and expenses from operations and changes in valuation allowance are included in the net expenses from OREO.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for which the Corporation has utilized level III inputs to determine fair value:

QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT LEVEL III FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30, 2015
	Fair Value		Valuation	Unobservable	Range
	Estimate		Techniques	Input	(Weighted Avg)

Impaired loans		1,881	Appraisal of	Appraisal	-20% (-20%)
			collateral (1)	adjustments (2)
				Liquidation	-10% (-10%)
				expenses (2)

OREO		64	Appraisal of	Appraisal
			collateral (1),(3)	adjustments (2)	-40% (-40%)
				Liquidation
				expenses (2)	-1% (-1%)

	December 31, 2014
	Fair Value		Valuation	Unobservable	Range
	Estimate		Techniques	Input	(Weighted Avg)

Impaired loans		2,357	Appraisal of	Appraisal	-20% (-20%)
			collateral (1)	adjustments (2)
				Liquidation	-10% (-10%)
				expenses (2)

OREO		69	Appraisal of	Appraisal
			collateral (1),(3)	adjustments (2)	-40% (-40%)
				Liquidation
				expenses (2)	-1% (-1%)

(1) Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various level III inputs which are not identifiable.

(2) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

(3) Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities Available for Sale

Management utilizes quoted market pricing for the fair value of the Corporation's securities that are available for sale, if available. If a quoted market rate is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

Regulatory Stock

Regulatory stock is valued at a stable dollar price, which is the price used to purchase or liquidate shares; therefore, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are individual loans for which the Corporation has a firm sales commitment; therefore, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of the fair value.

Loans

The fair value of fixed and variable rate loans is estimated by discounting back the scheduled future cash flows of the particular loan product, using the market interest rates of comparable loan products in the Corporation’s greater market area, with the same general structure, comparable credit ratings, and for the same remaining maturities.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

Fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.

Deposits

The fair value of non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts and interest bearing demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts is based on the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting back the expected cash flows of the time deposit using market interest rates from the Corporation’s greater market area currently offered for similar time deposits with similar remaining maturities.

Borrowings

The fair value of a term borrowing is estimated by comparing the rate currently offered for the same type of borrowing instrument with a matching remaining term.

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest payable is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Firm Commitments to Extend Credit, Lines of Credit, and Open Letters of Credit

These financial instruments are generally not subject to sale and estimated fair values are not readily available. The carrying value, represented by the net deferred fee arising from the unrecognized commitment or letter of credit, and the fair value, determined by discounting the remaining contractual fee over the term of the commitment, using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements with similar credit risk, is not considered material for disclosure purposes. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments are presented in Note 6.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Corporation's financial instruments at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, are summarized as follows:

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30, 2015
					Quoted Prices in
					Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
					for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying				Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level II)		(Level III)
	$		$		$		$		$
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		36,966		36,966		36,966		—		—
Securities available for sale		296,059		296,059		5,547		290,512		—
Regulatory stock		4,037		4,037		4,037		—		—
Loans held for sale		1,294		1,294		1,294		—		—
Loans, net of allowance		477,554		482,248		—		—		482,248
Accrued interest receivable		3,721		3,721		3,721		—		—
Bank owned life insurance		23,449		23,449		23,449		—		—

Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposits		207,826		207,826		207,826		—		—
Interest-bearing demand deposits		10,446		10,446		10,446		—		—
NOW accounts		80,571		80,571		80,571		—		—
Money market deposit accounts		67,843		67,843		67,843		—		—
Savings accounts		142,350		142,350		142,350		—		—
Time deposits		193,514		194,695		—		—		194,695
Total deposits		702,550		703,731		509,036		—		194,695

Short-term borrowings		4,930		4,930		4,930		—		—
Long-term debt		67,094		67,671		—		—		67,671
Accrued interest payable		522		522		522		—		—

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	December 31, 2014
					Quoted Prices in
					Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
					for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying				Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level II)		(Level III)
	$		$		$		$		$
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		43,412		43,412		43,412		—		—
Securities available for sale		295,822		295,822		5,208		290,614		—
Regulatory stock		3,227		3,227		3,227		—		—
Loans held for sale		506		506		506		—		—
Loans, net of allowance		464,027		463,197		—		—		463,197
Accrued interest receivable		3,706		3,706		3,706		—		—
Bank owned life insurance		20,603		20,603		20,603		—		—

Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposits		210,444		210,444		210,444		—		—
Interest-bearing demand deposits		14,039		14,039		14,039		—		—
NOW accounts		72,951		72,951		72,951		—		—
Money market deposit accounts		69,442		69,442		69,442		—		—
Savings accounts		131,206		131,206		131,206		—		—
Time deposits		201,569		203,787		—		—		203,787
Total deposits		699,651		701,869		498,082		—		203,787

Long-term debt		62,300		63,058		—		—		63,058
Accrued interest payable		586		586		586		—		—

6.	Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In order to meet the financing needs of its customers in the normal course of business, the Corporation makes various commitments that are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These commitments include firm commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit, and open letters of credit. As of June 30, 2015, firm loan commitments were $33.9 million, unused lines of credit were $155.1 million, and open letters of credit were $10.9 million. The total of these commitments was $199.9 million, which represents the Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by its customers with respect to these financial instruments. The actual credit losses that may arise from these commitments are expected to compare favorably with the Corporation’s loan loss experience on its loan portfolio taken as a whole. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for balance sheet financial instruments.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

7.	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (1) (2)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Unrealized
	Gains (Losses)
	on Securities
	Available-for-Sale
	$
Balance at December 31, 2014		1,002
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		1,529
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		(370	)
Period change		1,159

Balance at March 31, 2015		2,161
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(2,246	)
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		(396	)
Period change		(2,642	)

Balance at June 30, 2015		(481	)

Balance at December 31, 2013		(3,940	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		2,610
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		(437	)
Period change		2,173

Balance at March 31, 2014		(1,767	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		1,962
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		(384	)
Period change		1,578

Balance at June 30, 2014		(189	)

(1)	All amounts are net of tax. Related income tax expense or benefit is calculated using a Federal income tax rate of 34%.

(2)	Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

DETAILS ABOUT ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) COMPONENTS (1)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Amount Reclassified from
	Accumulated Other Comprehensive
	Income (Loss)
	For the Three Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			Affected Line Item in the
	$			$			Statements of Income
Securities available-for-sale:
Net securities gains reclassified into earnings		600			582		Gains on securities transactions, net
Related income tax expense		(204	)		(198	)	Provision for federal income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive
income for the period		396			384

(1) Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

DETAILS ABOUT ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) COMPONENTS (1)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Amount Reclassified from
	Accumulated Other Comprehensive
	Income (Loss)
	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2015			2014			Affected Line Item in the
	$			$			Statements of Income
Securities available-for-sale:
Net securities gains reclassified into earnings		1,161			1,267		Gains on securities transactions, net
Related income tax expense		(395	)		(431	)	Provision for federal income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive
income for the period		766			836

Net impairment losses reclassified into earnings		—			(22	)	Net impairment losses on investment securities
Related income tax expense		—			7		Provision for federal income taxes
Net effect on accumulated other comprehensive
income for the period		—			(15	)
Total reclassifications for the period		766			821

(1) Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

8. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-01, Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. The amendments in this Update permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. A reporting entity that uses the effective yield method to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects before the date of adoption may continue to apply the effective yield method for those preexisting investments. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The amendments in this Update clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments in this Update using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (a new revenue recognition standard). The Update’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, this update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. This Update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Corporation is evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting Update.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. The amendments in this Update change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. For repurchase financing arrangements, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amendments also require enhanced disclosures. The accounting changes in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity is required to present changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Earlier application is prohibited. The disclosure for certain transactions accounted for as a sale is required to be presented for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and the disclosure for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings is required to be presented for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and for interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. The disclosures are not required to be presented for comparative periods before the effective date. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments when the Terms of an Award Provide that a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-14, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40). The amendments in this Update require that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met: (1) the loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure, (2) at the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim, and (3) at the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed. Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. This Update did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements -Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). The amendments in this Update provide guidance in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This ASU clarifies how current U.S. GAAP should be interpreted in subjectively evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. Public business entities are required to implement the new requirements in fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-17, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting. The amendments in this Update apply to the separate financial statements of an acquired entity and its subsidiaries that are a business or nonprofit activity (either public or nonpublic) upon the occurrence of an event in which an acquirer (an individual or an entity) obtains control of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. If pushdown accounting is not applied in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs, an acquired entity will have the option to elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent reporting period to the acquired entity's most recent change-in-control event. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Income Statement –Extraordinary and Unusual Items, as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810). The amendments in this Update affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments (1) Modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities; (2) Eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership; (3) Affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships; (4) Provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. An entity should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. For an entity with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end, the amendments in this Update provide a practical expedient that permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity's fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. The practical expedient should be applied consistently to all plans if an entity has more than one plan. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, Intangible – Goodwill and Other Internal Use Software (Topic 350-40), as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. This guidance will help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments in this Update provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. For public business entities, the Board decided that the amendments will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. For all other entities, the amendments will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-06, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions. Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, contains guidance that addresses master limited partnerships that originated from Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 07-4, Application of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128 to Master Limited Partnerships. Under Topic 260, master limited partnerships apply the two-class method of calculating earnings per unit because the general partner, limited partners, and incentive distribution rights holders each participate differently in the distribution of available cash in accordance with the contractual rights contained in the partnership agreement. The amendments in this Update specify that for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a dropdown transaction should be allocated entirely to the general partner. In that circumstance, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners (which is typically the earnings per unit measure presented in the financial statements) would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. Qualitative disclosures about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings per unit under the two-class method also are required. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). The Update applies to reporting entities that elect to measure the fair value of an investment using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient. Under the amendments in this Update, investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical expedient should not be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. Removing those investments from the fair value hierarchy not only eliminates the diversity in practice resulting from the way in which investments measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) with future redemption dates are classified, but also ensures that all investments categorized in the fair value hierarchy are classified using a consistent approach. Investments that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent), but for which the practical expedient is not applied will continue to be included in the fair value hierarchy. A reporting entity should continue to disclose information on investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient to help users understand the nature and risks of the investments and whether the investments, if sold, are probable of being sold at amounts different from net asset value. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. A reporting entity should apply the amendments retrospectively to all periods presented. The retrospective approach requires that an investment for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient be removed from the fair value hierarchy in all periods presented in an entity's financial statements. Earlier application is permitted. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-08, Business Combinations - Pushdown Accounting - Amendment to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115. This ASU was issued to amend various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-09, Financial Services-Insurance (Topic 944) - Disclosure about Short-Duration Contracts. The amendments apply to all insurance entities that issue short-duration contracts as defined in Topic 944, Financial Services-Insurance. The amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual reporting periods certain information about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. The amendments also require insurance entities to disclose information about significant changes in methodologies and assumptions used to calculate the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, including reasons for the change and the effects on the financial statements. Additionally, the amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual and interim reporting periods a rollforward of the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, described in Topic 944. For health insurance claims, the amendments require the disclosure of the total of incurred-but-not-reported liabilities plus expected development on reported claims included in the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

In June 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-10, Technical Corrections and Improvements. The amendments in this Update represent changes to clarify the Codification, correct unintended application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Transition guidance varies based on the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update that require transition guidance are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. All other amendments will be effective upon the issuance of this Update. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis represents management’s view of the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other financial schedules included in this quarterly report, and in conjunction with the 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders of the Corporation. The financial condition and results of operations presented are not indicative of future performance.

Forward-Looking Statements

The U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor in regards to the inclusion of forward-looking statements in this document and documents incorporated by reference. Forward-looking statements pertain to possible or assumed future results that are made using current information. These forward-looking statements are generally identified when terms such as: “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “project,” “forecast,” and other similar wordings are used. The readers of this report should take into consideration that these forward-looking statements represent management’s expectations as to future forecasts of financial performance, or the likelihood that certain events will or will not occur. Due to the very nature of estimates or predications, these forward-looking statements should not be construed to be indicative of actual future results. Additionally, management may change estimates of future performance, or the likelihood of future events, as additional information is obtained. This document may also address targets, guidelines, or strategic goals that management is striving to reach but may not be indicative of actual results.

Readers should note that many factors affect this forward-looking information, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document and in the documents that are incorporated by reference into this document. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

National and local economic conditions

Real estate market and its impact on the loan portfolio

Monetary and interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board

Volatility of the securities markets including the valuation of securities

Future actions or inactions of the United States government, including a failure to increase the government debt limit or a prolonged shutdown of the federal government

Effects of slow economic conditions and the prolonged economic weakness, specifically the effect on loan customers to repay loans

Political changes and their impact on new laws and regulations

Competitive forces

Changes in customer behavior impacting deposit levels and loan demand

Changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and other accounting standards setters

Ineffective business strategy due to current or future market and competitive conditions

Management’s ability to manage credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, and fair value risk

Operation, legal, and reputation risk

Results of the regulatory examination and supervision process

The risk that our analyses of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful

The impact of new laws and regulations, including the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the regulations issued thereunder

Possible impacts of the capital and liquidity requirements of the Basel III standards and other regulatory pronouncements, regulations and rules

Disruptions due to flooding, severe weather, or other natural disasters.

Readers should be aware if any of the above factors change significantly, the statements regarding future performance could also change materially. The safe harbor provision provides that the Corporation is not required to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report. Readers should review any changes in risk factors in documents filed by the Corporation periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Results of Operations

Overview

The Corporation recorded net income of $1,596,000 and $3,062,000 for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, an 8.3% and 14.4% decrease respectively, from the $1,740,000 and $3,578,000 earned during the same periods in 2014. The earnings per share, basic and diluted, were $0.56 and $1.07 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $0.61 and $1.25 for the same periods in 2014.

The two primary reasons for the decline in earnings were an increase in the provision for loans losses and an increase in operational expenses for the year-to-date period. The Corporation recorded $100,000 and $300,000 of expense related to the provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to a credit provision of $100,000 and $300,000 for the same periods in 2014. The increase in provision expense was primarily due to charge-offs recorded in the first quarter of 2015, as well as loan portfolio growth through the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in charge-offs recorded in 2015 resulted in higher historical loss factors, which caused the higher required provision. Low levels of delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, as well as minimal charge-offs over the past years resulted in the need to reduce the allowance for loan losses by recording a credit provision in the prior year. The allowance as a percentage of total loans was 1.50% as of June 30, 2015, compared to 1.55% as of June 30, 2014. More detail is provided in the Provision for Loan Losses section that follows and the Allowance for Loan Losses section under Financial Condition.

Operating expenses increased by $398,000, or 6.9%, and $750,000, or 6.5%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Personnel costs increased by $193,000, or 5.5%, and $465,000, or 6.7%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 2014, due to new staff positions as well as higher benefit costs associated with new and existing staff. The personnel costs increase was largely the result of additional staffing in the mortgage department, but there was also a new information system position and three position upgrades in the operations, loans, and legal areas. The mortgage area is undergoing an expansion while the added and upgraded positions are largely to cover new requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.

In the other income area, net gains on securities increased by $18,000, or 3.1%, and decreased by $84,000, or 6.7%, for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Net gains on the sale of mortgages increased by $144,000, or 156.5%, and $259,000, or 199.2%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. More detail is provided under the Other Income and Operating Expense sections under Results of Operations.

The Corporation’s net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, increased from the same periods in 2014. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, net interest income was $5,767,000, compared to $5,608,000 for the same quarter of 2014, a $159,000, or 2.8% increase. The Corporation’s net interest margin was 3.09% for the second quarter of 2015, compared to 3.10% for the second quarter of 2014. The Corporation’s year-to-date net interest margin was 3.11% through June 30, 2015, compared to 3.16% for the same period in 2014.

The financial services industry uses two primary performance measurements to gauge performance: return on average assets (ROA) and return on average equity (ROE). ROA measures how efficiently a bank generates income based on the amount of assets or size of a company. ROE measures the efficiency of a company in generating income based on the amount of equity or capital utilized. The latter measurement typically receives more attention from shareholders. The ROA and ROE decreased for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year due to the decrease in the Corporation’s income and an increase in asset and capital levels.

Key Ratios
	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014

Return on Average Assets		0.74%		0.83%		0.71%		0.87%
Return on Average Equity		6.85%		7.92%		6.61%		8.32%

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The results of the Corporation’s operations are best explained by addressing, in further detail, the five major sections of the income statement, which are as follows:

Net interest income

Provision for loan losses

Other income

Operating expenses

Provision for income taxes

The following discussion analyzes each of these five components.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income (NII) represents the largest portion of the Corporation’s operating income. In the first six months of 2015, NII generated 71.7% of the Corporation’s gross revenue, which consists of net interest income and non-interest income, compared to 72.1% in the first six months of 2014. The overall performance of the Corporation is highly dependent on the changes in net interest income since it comprises such a significant portion of operating income.

The following table shows a summary analysis of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. For analytical purposes and throughout this discussion, yields, rates, and measurements such as NII, net interest spread, and net yield on interest earning assets are presented on an FTE basis. The FTE net interest income shown in both tables below will exceed the NII reported on the consolidated statements of income, which is not shown on an FTE basis. The amount of FTE adjustment totaled $461,000 and $900,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $473,000 and $948,000 for the same periods in 2014.

NET INTEREST INCOME

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
	$		$		$		$
Total interest income		6,718		6,825		13,590		13,697
Total interest expense		951		1,217		1,965		2,434

Net interest income		5,767		5,608		11,625		11,263
Tax equivalent adjustment		461		473		900		948

Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)		6,228		6,081		12,525		12,211

NII is the difference between interest income earned on assets and interest expense incurred on liabilities. Accordingly, two factors affect net interest income:

The rates earned on interest earning assets and paid on interest bearing liabilities

The average balance of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities

The Federal funds rate, the Prime rate, the shape of the U.S. Treasury curve, and other wholesale funding curves, all affect NII. The Federal Reserve controls the Federal funds rate, which is one of a number of tools available to the Federal Reserve to conduct monetary policy. The Federal funds rate, and guidance on when the rate might be changed, is often the focal point of discussion regarding the direction of interest rates. The Federal funds rate has not changed since December of 2008. While the Federal Reserve has not changed the Federal funds rate over the past six years, it has been utilizing a number of other granted powers to help stimulate the economy while managing monetary policy, including maintaining low levels of inflation. This period of over six years with extremely low overnight rates is the lowest and longest in U.S. history. Prior to the filing of this document, the Federal Reserve Bank chose to hold the Federal Funds target rate at 0.25% on July 29, 2015. However, it is likely that the Federal Reserve will act to increase the overnight rates at one of the three remaining 2015 Federal Reserve Board meetings, the first being on September 17, 2015, with subsequent meetings of October 28, 2015 and December 16, 2015.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The Prime rate is generally used by commercial banks to extend variable rate loans to business and commercial customers. For many years, the Prime rate has been set at 300 basis points, or 3.00% higher, than the Federal funds rate and typically moves when the Federal funds rate changes. As such, the Prime rate has also not moved from its historic low of 3.25% since December 16, 2008.

The fact that the Federal funds rate and the Prime rate have remained at these very low levels for over six years has made it difficult to grow the NII of the Corporation as the net interest margin has declined. During the first half of 2015, management was able to grow interest-earning assets 4.3% over the first half of 2014. Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis increased by $314,000, or 2.6%, but the Corporation’s margin still showed a decline from the prior year’s period. This is typical in a prolonged low rate environment when additional savings on interest expense are limited, while yields on the Corporation’s longer assets continue to reprice to lower levels. This causes a decline in the Corporation’s margin, but the impact of the decrease in margin can be offset by sufficient increases in interest earning assets, causing an increase in NII.

The extended extremely low Federal funds rate has enabled management to reduce the cost of funds on overnight borrowings and allowed lower interest rates paid on deposits, reducing the Corporation’s interest expense, while the decrease in the Prime rate has reduced the yield on the Corporation’s Prime-based loans. In this environment, the Corporation’s fixed rate loans and securities have generally repriced to lower rates as they mature or reach the end of their fixed-rate period. This has occurred over the past six years and continues to cause lower yields on the Corporation’s assets.

Security yields fluctuate more rapidly than loan yields based primarily on the changes to the U.S. Treasury rates and yield curve. With lower U.S. Treasury rates on average in the first half of 2015 compared to 2014, most of the security reinvesting was occurring at lower rates. As the volume of securities sold at gains continued at a higher level, this also resulted in more reinvestment at lower rates. Management did generally direct a portion of the security sale proceeds into loan growth. Additionally, management repositioned within the security portfolio and purchased shorter assets, which affected security yield. Meanwhile, the Corporation’s loan yield has continued to decline as new loans are going on at lower rates in 2015 and previous years. Management does price a minority portion of business and consumer loans above the Prime rate on variable rate loans, which helps with loan yield, however, these rates on average are still lower than the typical fixed rate loan. Therefore, any increases in total variable rate loans will generally reduce overall loan portfolio yield. An element of the Corporation’s Prime-based commercial loans is priced above the Prime rate based on the level of credit risk of the borrower. Additionally, certain variable rate consumer loans are priced above Prime. Prime-based pricing continues to be driven largely by local competition.

Mid-term and long-term interest rates generally declined throughout the first quarter of 2015 then increased throughout the second quarter of 2015 with little moves up and down, but ultimately ending higher than they were at the end of 2014. However, rates on average were lower than they were during the first half of 2014. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield stood at 2.35% on June 30, 2015, compared to 2.17% at December 31, 2014 and 2.53% at June 30, 2014. Lower U.S. Treasury rates during the first quarter of 2015 provided opportunities to sell securities at gains. Even with slightly higher rates during the second quarter of 2015, a number of securities were sold at significant gains.

While it is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve savings on the Corporation’s overall cost of funds, management was able to selectively reprice longer-term time deposits and borrowings to lower levels during the first half of 2015 resulting in continued savings. Only time deposit terms three years or longer are repricing at lower rates, providing interest expense savings on deposits. It is not anticipated that interest rates on interest bearing core deposits can be reduced further in 2015 as these rates have already been reduced significantly over the course of the past few years. Borrowing costs, and the wholesale borrowing curves that they are based on, generally follow the direction and slope of the U.S. Treasury curve, however these curves can be quicker to rise and slower to fall as the providers of these funds seek to protect themselves from rate movements. The Corporation was able to refinance longer-term borrowings at lower rates in the first half of 2015 and expects this trend to continue throughout the year as some advances at higher rates mature and are replaced by lower cost borrowings.

Management currently anticipates that the overnight interest rate and Prime rate will increase prior to the end of 2015. It is likely that the mid and long-term Treasury rates could increase throughout the course of the rest of the year in anticipation of a Federal Reserve rate movement. This would allow management to achieve higher earnings on assets given higher yielding securities and the ability to price new loans at higher market rates. If the Federal Reserve would act to increase overnight rates it is also possible that the yield curve could flatten, making it more difficult for management to increase the yield on earning assets and net interest margin, as generally the Corporation will make loans or reinvest into securities further out on the yield curve such as five-year instruments.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Generally, a flatter yield curve is not conducive to increasing net interest margin and net interest income. However, the Corporation has benefited from a gradual increase in the amount of variable rate loans. Approximately 25% of the Corporation’s loans are variable rate, which would reprice to a higher rate based on the Prime rate with any Federal Reserve increase. Higher amounts of variable rate loans would help in the event of a flatter yield curve but would likely not be sufficient alone to offset higher funding costs if short-term rates were to increase materially, therefore a lower margin would occur.

The Corporation’s margin was 3.08% for the second quarter of 2015, a two basis-point decline from the 3.10% for the second quarter of 2014. For the year-to-date period, the Corporation’s margin was 3.11%, a five basis-point decline from the 3.16% for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Although loan growth is occurring, it has been a challenge to increase loan pricing to the point where it is contributing to an increase in overall asset yield. As cost of funds savings become harder to achieve, the only way to materially increase net interest margin going forward will be through increases in asset yield. This was a challenge in the second quarter of 2015, and will likely remain a challenge. Any improvement in asset yields would be dependent on mid-term and longer-term interest rates increasing. This would assist with increased loan pricing and higher securities yields as a result of reduced amortization and higher yields being available at time of purchase.

As shown on the tables that follow, interest income, on an FTE basis for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, decreased by $119,000, or 1.6%, and interest expense decreased by $266,000, or 21.9%, compared to the same periods in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, on an FTE basis, interest income decreased by $155,000, or 1.1%, and interest expense decreased by $469,000, or 19.3%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The following tables show a more detailed analysis of net interest income on an FTE basis shown with all the major elements of the Corporation’s balance sheet, which consists of interest earning and non-interest earning assets and interest bearing and non-interest bearing liabilities. Additionally, the analysis provides the net interest spread and the net yield on interest earning assets. The net interest spread is the difference between the yield on interest earning assets and the interest rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. The net interest spread has the deficiency of not giving credit for the non-interest bearing funds and capital used to fund a portion of the total interest earning assets. For this reason, Management emphasizes the net yield on interest earning assets, also referred to as the net interest margin (NIM). The NIM is calculated by dividing net interest income on an FTE basis into total average interest earning assets. The NIM is generally the benchmark used by analysts to measure how efficiently a bank generates NII.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

COMPARATIVE AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2015						2014
					(c)						(c)
	Average				Annualized		Average				Annualized
	Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate		Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate
	$		$		%		$		$		%
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Federal funds sold and interest
on deposits at other banks		24,015		18		0.31		23,055		20		0.35

Securities available for sale:
Taxable		199,109		824		1.66		207,194		1,088		2.10
Tax-exempt		95,296		1,207		5.07		102,179		1,269		4.97
Total securities (d)		294,405		2,031		2.76		309,373		2,357		3.05

Loans (a)		485,521		5,084		4.19		448,756		4,869		4.34

Regulatory stock		3,893		46		4.73		3,942		52		5.30

Total interest earning assets		807,834		7,179		3.55		785,126		7,298		3.72

Non-interest earning assets (d)		58,499						54,996

Total assets		866,333						840,122

LIABILITIES &
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		156,415		70		0.18		151,231		67		0.18
Savings deposits		140,415		19		0.05		127,744		17		0.05
Time deposits		194,741		521		1.07		216,121		693		1.30
Borrowed funds		73,686		341		1.85		74,093		440		2.38
Total interest bearing liabilities		565,257		951		0.68		569,189		1,217		0.86

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

Demand deposits		204,832						179,711
Other		2,748						3,098

Total liabilities		772,837						751,998

Stockholders' equity		93,496						88,124

Total liabilities & stockholders' equity		866,333						840,122

Net interest income (FTE)				6,228						6,081

Net interest spread (b)						2.87						2.86
Effect of non-interest
bearing deposits						0.21						0.24
Net yield on interest earning assets (c)						3.08						3.10

(a) Includes balances of nonaccrual loans and the recognition of any related interest income. The quarter-to-date average balances include net deferred loan costs of $486,000 as of June 30, 2015, and $389,000 as of June 30, 2014. Such fees and costs recognized through income and included in the interest amounts totaled ($53,000) in 2015, and ($32,000) in 2014.

(b) Net interest spread is the arithmetic difference between the yield on interest earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

(c) Net yield, also referred to as net interest margin, is computed by dividing net interest income (FTE) by total interest earning assets.

(d) Securities recorded at amortized cost. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included in non-interest earning assets.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

COMPARATIVE AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015						2014
					(c)						(c)
	Average				Annualized		Average				Annualized
	Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate		Balance		Interest		Yield/Rate
	$		$		%		$		$		%
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Federal funds sold and interest
on deposits at other banks		22,095		33		0.30		17,880		27		0.31

Securities available for sale:
Taxable		204,651		1,841		1.80		201,713		2,269		2.25
Tax-exempt		93,174		2,355		5.06		102,740		2,571		5.00
Total securities (d)		297,825		4,196		2.82		304,453		4,840		3.18

Loans (a)		482,367		10,089		4.19		446,450		9,693		4.35

Regulatory stock		3,684		172		9.34		3,769		85		4.51

Total interest earning assets		805,971		14,490		3.60		772,552		14,645		3.80

Non-interest earning assets (d)		57,822						53,545

Total assets		863,793						826,097

LIABILITIES &
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		157,081		140		0.18		146,360		128		0.18
Savings deposits		137,854		36		0.05		125,949		34		0.05
Time deposits		196,760		1,108		1.14		215,614		1,404		1.31
Borrowed funds		73,124		681		1.88		71,669		868		2.44
Total interest bearing liabilities		564,819		1,965		0.70		559,592		2,434		0.88

Non-interest bearing liabilities:

Demand deposits		202,801						176,506
Other		2,802						3,273

Total liabilities		770,422						739,371

Stockholders' equity		93,371						82,726

Total liabilities & stockholders' equity		863,793						822,097

Net interest income (FTE)				12,525						12,211

Net interest spread (b)						2.90						2.92
Effect of non-interest
bearing deposits						0.21						0.24
Net yield on interest earning assets (c)						3.11						3.16

(a) Includes balances of nonaccrual loans and the recognition of any related interest income. The year-to-date average balances include net deferred loan costs of $471,000 as of June 30, 2015, and $373,000 as of June 30, 2014. Such fees and costs recognized through income and included in the interest amounts totaled ($95,000) in 2015, and ($58,000) in 2014.

(b) Net interest spread is the arithmetic difference between the yield on interest earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

(c) Net yield, also referred to as net interest margin, is computed by dividing net interest income (FTE) by total interest earning assets.

(d) Securities recorded at amortized cost. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included in non-interest earning assets.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Loan yields were at historically low levels during 2014 and during the six months ended June 30, 2015, due to the extended low-rate environment as well as extremely competitive pricing for the limited number of quality loan opportunities in the market. The Corporation’s loan yield decreased 15 basis points in the second quarter of 2015 compared to the second quarter of 2014, and decreased 16 basis points for the first six months of 2015 compared to the same period in 2014. It is anticipated that these yields will improve in the coming months as the economy improves and loan demand increases, reducing pricing pressures and intense competition for loans. Despite the lower yields, the growth in the loan portfolio resulted in interest income on loans increasing $215,000, or 4.4%, for the second quarter of 2015 compared to the second quarter of 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Corporation’s interest income on loans increased $396,000, or 4.1%, compared to the same period in 2014.

Loan pricing was a challenge in 2014, and continues to be in 2015 as a result of intense competition resulting in fixed-rate loans being priced at very low levels and variable-rate loans priced at the Prime rate. The Prime rate is below typical fixed-rate business and commercial loans, which generally range between 3.50% and 5.50%, depending on term and credit risk. Management is able to price customers with higher levels of credit risk at Prime plus pricing but these rates still average below the rates of the most typical five-year fixed rate loans. Additionally, with the strong improvement to the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio there are fewer opportunities to price more credit risk into the loan rates. While Prime-based loans will aid the Corporation when interest rates rise, any further increase in Prime-based loans as a percentage of total loans will currently cause the Corporation’s average loan yield to decrease. The Asset Liability Committee (ALCO) carefully monitors the NIM because it indicates trends in net interest income, the Corporation’s largest source of revenue. For more information on the plans and strategies in place to protect the NIM and moderate the impact of rising rates, please refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Earnings and yields on the Corporation’s securities declined by 29 basis points for the second quarter of 2015 compared to the second quarter of 2014. For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2015, the yield on the securities portfolio declined by 36 basis points compared to the year-to-date period in 2014. The Corporation’s securities portfolio consists of nearly all fixed income debt instruments. The Corporation’s taxable securities experienced a 44 basis-point decrease in yield for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and a 45 basis-point decrease in yield for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Most security reinvestment in the past few years has been occurring at lower rates and amortization has been higher in recent years due to faster prepayment speeds on MBS and CMO securities. Each time U.S. Treasury rates experience a decline, the prepayment speeds pick up and negatively impact the yield on these securities. Meanwhile, tax-exempt security yields increased by ten basis points and six basis points for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. The yields on these tax-exempt municipal bonds are not as quick to follow changes in the U.S. Treasury rates. They have been relatively stable despite significant movements in the 10-year U.S. Treasury from one year ago. As the 10-year U.S. Treasury rates declined, the spreads available on these securities increased, resulting in similar yields. Management was also selling out of lower yielding municipal bonds in an effort to improve overall municipal bond yield.

In the current rate environment with short-term rates extremely low and with small rate differences for longer-term deposits, the consumer is electing to stay short and maintain funds in accessible deposit instruments. As a result, the customer prefers keeping balances in both non-interest and interest bearing checking products and savings accounts. In addition to the consumer staying liquid with their available funds, there has been a general trend of funds flowing from time deposit accounts into both non-interest checking, NOW and savings accounts. The average balance of the Corporation’s interest bearing liabilities decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2015, and increased minimally during the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. The average balance of time deposits declined significantly in 2015 more than offsetting the increases in the other areas of NOW, MMDA, and savings accounts, causing total interest bearing funds to decrease. However, with more of the interest bearing funds in the form of NOW, MMDA, and savings accounts rather than time deposits, the average interest rate paid on all of these instruments is lower than previous, resulting in less interest expense.

Interest expense on deposits declined by $167,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $282,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Demand and savings deposits reprice in entirety whenever the offering rates are changed. This allows management to reduce interest costs rapidly; however, it becomes difficult to continue to gain cost savings once offering rates decline to these historically low levels. The annualized rate on interest bearing demand accounts was 0.18% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, and 2014. The scope of further reductions in dollar amount of interest expense is very limited since rates cannot be reduced much lower. For the first six months of 2015, the average balances of interest bearing demand deposits increased by $10.7 million, or 7.3%, over the same period in 2014, while the average balance of savings accounts increased by $11.9 million, or 9.5%. This increase in balances of lower cost accounts has helped to reduce the Corporation’s overall interest expense in 2015 compared to 2014.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Time deposits reprice over time according to their maturity schedule. This enables management to both reduce and increase rates slowly over time. During 2014 and through the first half of 2015, time deposit balances decreased. The decrease can be attributed to the lowest rates paid historically on time deposits, which has caused the differential between time deposit rates and rates on non-maturing deposits to be minimal. As a result, customers have elected to keep more of their funds in non-maturity deposits and less funds in time deposits. Because time deposits are the most expensive deposit product for the Corporation and the largest dollar expense from a funding standpoint, the reduction in time deposits, along with the increases in interest-bearing checking, savings, and non-interest bearing checking, has allowed the Corporation to achieve a lower cost and more balanced deposit funding position. The Corporation was able to reduce interest expense on time deposits by $172,000, or 24.8%, for the second quarter of 2015, compared to the same period in 2014, and $296,000, or 21.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. Average balances decreased by $21.3 million, or 9.9%, and $18.9 million, or 8.7%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. The average annualized interest rate paid on time deposits decreased by 23 basis points for the three-month period and 17 basis points for the six-month period when comparing both years.

The Corporation historically uses both short-term and long-term borrowings to supplement liquidity generated by deposit growth. Average short-term advances of $7,201,000 were utilized in the first half of 2015, compared to $4,900,000 in the first half of 2014. Management has used long-term borrowings as part of an asset liability strategy to lengthen liabilities rather than as a source of liquidity. Average total borrowings decreased by $0.4 million, or 0.5%, in the second quarter of 2015, compared to the same quarter in 2014, and increased by $1.5 million, or 2.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. Interest expense was $99,000, or 22.5% lower, for the three-month period and $187,000, or 21.5% lower, for the six-month period when comparing 2015 to 2014, as a result of management refinancing maturing long-term advances to lower rates.

The NIM was 3.08% for the second quarter of 2015, and 3.11% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 3.10% and 3.16% for the same periods in 2014. For the quarter ended June 30, 2015, the net interest spread increased one basis point to 2.87%, from 2.86% for the same period in 2014. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, the net interest spread decreased two basis points to 2.90%, from 2.92% for the same period in 2014. The effect of non-interest bearing funds dropped three basis points for the three and six-month periods compared to the prior year. The effect of non-interest bearing funds refers to the benefit gained from deposits on which the Corporation does not pay interest. As rates go lower, the benefit of non-interest bearing deposits is reduced because there is less difference between no-cost funds and interest bearing liabilities. For example, if a savings account with $10,000 earns 1%, the benefit for $10,000 of non-interest bearing deposits is equivalent to $100; but if the rate is reduced to 0.20%, then the benefit is only $20. This assumes dollar-for-dollar replacement, which is not realistic, but demonstrates the way the lower cost of funds affects the benefit to non-interest bearing deposits.

The Asset Liability Committee (ALCO) carefully monitors the NIM because it indicates trends in net interest income, the Corporation’s largest source of revenue. For more information on the plans and strategies in place to protect the NIM and moderate the impact of rising rates, refer to Item 7A: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Provision for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses (ALLL) provides for losses inherent in the loan portfolio as determined by a quarterly analysis and calculation of various factors related to the loan portfolio. The amount of the provision reflects the adjustment management determines necessary to ensure the ALLL is adequate to cover any losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporation recorded a provision expense of $100,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, and $300,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to credit provisions of $100,000 and $300,000 for the same periods in 2014. The analysis of the ALLL takes into consideration, among other things, the following factors:

levels and trends in delinquencies, nonaccruals, charge-offs and recoveries,

trends within the loan portfolio,

changes in lending policies and procedures,

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

experience of lending personnel and management oversight,

national and local economic trends,

concentrations of credit,

external factors such as legal and regulatory requirements,

changes in the quality of loan review and board oversight,

changes in the value of underlying collateral.

A credit provision was recorded in 2014 due to the following factors:

Low levels of delinquent and non-performing loans

Lower levels of classified loans

Low net charge-offs/recoveries

Prior to 2012, the annual provision expense was at increased levels to account for difficult economic conditions that had an impact on the financial health of the Corporation’s borrowers and a direct impact on asset quality. Throughout 2014, after analysis of the factors listed above, the allowance for loan loss calculation resulted in a reduction of the provision because of significant improvements in the loan portfolio related to delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans. In the first half of 2015, increased charge-offs again resulted in the need to increase the Corporation’s provision expense. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation’s net charge-offs were $193,000, compared to net recoveries of $49,000 during the first six months of 2014. This was largely responsible for the higher provision expense of $300,000 recorded in the first six months of 2015, compared to a $300,000 credit provision during the first six months of 2014. The higher charge-offs in the first six months of 2015 are the result of one $272,000 commercial loan charge-off in the first quarter of 2015, which completely charged off all the remaining loan balance to this borrower. This was the second charge-off related to this borrower. The first charge off was $204,000 and occurred in the fourth quarter of 2014. In addition to charge-offs and recoveries, management closely tracks delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans as a percentage of capital and of the loan portfolio.

As of June 30, 2015, total delinquencies represented 0.45% of total loans, compared to 0.58% as of June 30, 2014. These ratios are low compared to local and national peer groups. The vast majority of the Corporation’s loan customers have remained very steadfast in making their loan payments and avoiding delinquency, even during challenging economic conditions. The delinquency ratios speak to the long-term health, conservative nature, and, importantly, the character of the Corporation’s customers and lending practices. Classified loans are primarily determined by loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios. The prolonged economic downturn, including devaluation of residential and commercial real estate, had stressed these ratios in past periods. Valuations have recently shown improvements and the levels of classified loans have declined significantly, well below levels experienced in years prior to 2013. The delinquency and classified loan information is utilized in the quarterly allowance for loan loss (ALLL) calculation, which directly affects the provision expense. A sharp increase or decrease in delinquencies and/or classified loans during the quarter would be cause for management to increase or decrease the provision expense. The level of actual charge-offs relative to the amount of recoveries can have a significant impact on the provision. Management had charge-offs that exceeded recoveries in the first quarter of 2015 which resulted in the need to record a provision expense for the year-to-date period.

Generally, management will evaluate and adjust, if necessary, the provision expense each quarter based upon completion of the quarterly ALLL calculation. Future provision amounts will depend on the amount of loan growth achieved versus levels of delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans.

In addition to the above, provision expense is impacted by three major components that are all included in the quarterly calculation of the ALLL. First, specific allocations are made for any loans where management has determined an exposure that needs to be provided for. These specific allocations are reviewed each quarter to determine if adjustments need to be made. It is common for specific allocations to be reduced as additional principal payments are made, so while some specific allocations are being added, others are being reduced. Second, management provides for estimated losses on pools of similar loans based on historical loss experience. Finally, management utilizes qualitative factors every quarter to adjust historical loss experience to take into consideration the current trends in loan volume, delinquencies, charge-offs, changes in lending practices, and the quality of the Corporation’s underwriting, credit analysis, lending staff, and Board oversight. National and local economic trends and conditions are helpful to determine the amount of loan loss allowance the Corporation should be carrying on the various types of loans. Management evaluates and adjusts, if necessary, the qualitative factors on a quarterly basis.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

For both the first and second quarters of 2015, normal qualitative factor adjustments for expected loan losses were made, however the general trend is lower qualitative factors, which would cause a lower ALLL calculation. More qualitative factors were reduced than increased in both the first and second quarters of 2015. In the first quarter of 2015, stable employment, experience and depth in the lending area allowed for a reduction of this factor for all pools. The qualitative factor for trends in the nature and volume of the loans was lowered for agricultural dairy loans and consumer loans outside of home equity, as growth rates slowed. The most significant growth rate change has occurred in agricultural dairy loans where the Corporation has gone from a very high growth rate in 2013, to slowing over a period of several quarters, to declines in both the first and second quarters of 2015, allowing the adjustment to be cut in half since the second quarter of 2014. The qualitative factor for health of the national and local economic conditions was also lowered in the first quarter related to all consumer loans. In the second quarter of 2015, lower levels of delinquencies in business loans, business mortgages, and consumer credit lines allowed for a 5 basis point reduction in those areas, while an increase in growth trends of CRE loans, consumer credit lines, and personal loans resulted in an increase in those qualitative factors by 5 basis points.

The Corporation’s charge-offs and recoveries have a direct impact on the ALLL and the provision for loan losses. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation’s net charge-offs were $193,000. This compares to net recoveries of $49,000 during the first six months of 2014. This was largely responsible for the higher provision expense of $300,000 recorded in the first six months of 2015, compared to a $300,000 credit provision during the first six months of 2014. The higher charge-offs in the first six months of 2015 are the result of one commercial loan charge-off in the first quarter of 2015. This was the second charge-off related to this borrower, with the first occurring in the fourth quarter of 2014. No additional charge-offs are expected on this borrower.

Management monitors the allowance as a percentage of total loans. The percentage of the allowance to total loans has decreased slightly since June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014, but remains comparable with the peer group. As of June 30, 2015, the allowance as a percentage of total loans was 1.50%, down from 1.52% at December 31, 2014, and 1.55% at June 30, 2014. Management continues to evaluate the allowance for loan losses in relation to the size of the loan portfolio and changes to the segments within the loan portfolio and their associated credit risk. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for future loan losses based on the current portfolio and the current economic environment. More detail is provided under Allowance for Loan Losses in the Financial Condition section that follows.

Other Income

Other income for the second quarter of 2015 was $2,394,000, an increase of $226,000, or 10.4%, compared to the $2,168,000 earned during the second quarter of 2014. For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2015, other income totaled $4,595,000, an increase of $247,000, or 5.7%, compared to the same period in 2014. The following tables detail the categories that comprise other income.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

OTHER INCOME

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014
	$		$		$			%

Trust and investment services		316		285		31			10.9
Service charges on deposit accounts		273		285		(12	)		(4.2	)
Other service charges and fees		212		139		73			52.5
Commissions		503		494		9			1.8
Gains on securities transactions, net		600		582		18			3.1
Impairment losses on securities		—		—		—			—
Gains on sale of mortgages		236		92		144			156.5
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		174		159		15			9.4
Other miscellaneous income		80		132		(52	)		(39.4	)

Total other income		2,394		2,168		226			10.4

OTHER INCOME

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Six Months Ended June 30,					Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014
	$		$			$			%

Trust and investment services		671		650			21			3.2
Service charges on deposit accounts		530		560			(30	)		(5.4	)
Other service charges and fees		356		254			102			40.2
Commissions		968		960			8			0.8
Gains on securities transactions, net		1,161		1,267			(106	)		(8.4	)
Impairment losses on securities		—		(22	)		22			(100.0	)
Gains on sale of mortgages		389		130			259			199.2
Earnings on bank owned life insurance		334		314			20			6.4
Other miscellaneous income		186		235			(49	)		(20.9	)

Total other income		4,595		4,348			247			5.7

Trust and investment services income increased $31,000, or 10.9%, and $21,000, or 3.2%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods last year. This revenue consists of income from traditional trust services and income from alternative investment services provided through a third party. In the second quarter of 2015, traditional trust income increased by $15,000, or 7.7%, while income from alternative investments increased by $16,000, or 17.5%, compared to the second quarter of 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, traditional trust services income increased by $8,000, or 1.8%, while income from alternative investment services increased by $13,000, or 6.2%, compared to the same period in 2014. Trust income was up for both periods as a result of both higher fees and higher trust valuations. Investment services income is dependent on new investment activity derived from the period and was up for both the three-month and six-month periods in both years. The trust and investment services area continues to be an area of strategic focus for the Corporation. Management believes there is a great need for retirement, estate, small business planning, and personal investment services in the Corporation’s service area. Management also sees these services as being a necessary part of a comprehensive line of financial solutions across the organization.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased by $12,000, or 4.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $30,000, or 5.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Overdraft service charges are the largest component of this category and comprised approximately 81% of the total deposit service charges for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and 85% of the total deposit service charges for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Total overdraft fees decreased by $10,000, or 4.4%, and $24,000, or 5.2%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Management attributes lower overdraft fee income to changes in customer behavior. Customers have been more diligent in preventing overdrafts. No changes to Bank fees or policies have occurred. Most of the other service charge areas showed minimal increases or decreases from the prior year.

Other service charges and fees increased by $73,000, or 52.5%, and $102,000, or 40.2%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. The quarterly and year-to-date increase is primarily due to an increase in loan administration fees that were higher by $36,000, or 107.6%, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2015, and $67,000, or 133.8%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year. An increase in fees in the second quarter of 2014 as well as higher mortgage origination volume was responsible for this increase. Mortgage volume for 2015 is running at nearly three times the pace as the first half of 2014, a direct result of the resources allocated to the Corporation’s mortgage expansion. Fees for 30-year mortgage originations increased by $20,000, or 311.7%, and $22,000, or 179.8%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Letter of credit fees increased by $10,000, or 63.4%, and $3,000, or 6.5%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Various other fee income categories increased or decreased slightly.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, $600,000 of gains on securities transactions excluding impairment were recorded compared to $582,000 for the same period in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, $1,161,000 of gains on securities transactions were recorded compared to $1,267,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Gains or losses on securities transactions fluctuate based on market opportunities to take gains and reposition the securities portfolio to improve long-term earnings, or as part of management’s asset liability goals to improve liquidity or reduce interest rate risk or fair value risk. Gains or losses on securities fluctuate significantly based on market pricing and the volume of security sales. Generally, the lower U.S. Treasury yields, the more management will be motivated to pursue taking gains from the sale of securities. However, these market opportunities are evaluated subject to the Corporation’s other asset liability measurements and goals. The yield curve in the first half of 2015 and 2014 provided opportunities to take significant gains out of the portfolio although the year-to-date gains in 2015 were slightly lower than those recorded in the first half of 2014.

While there were no impairment losses for the six months ended June 30, 2015, there were impairment losses on securities of $22,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Impairment losses occur when securities are written down to a lower value based on anticipated credit losses. The impairment losses recorded in 2014 were related to private collateralized mortgage obligations, which were all sold in the first half of 2014. Further information on securities and other than temporary impairment is provided in the Securities Available for Sale section, under Financial Condition, in this filing.

Gains on the sale of mortgages were $236,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2015, compared to $92,000 for the same period in 2014, a $144,000, or 156.5% increase. Gains on the sale of mortgages for the six months ended June 30, 2015, increased by $259,000, or 199.2%, compared to the same period in 2014. Secondary mortgage financing activity drives the gains on the sale of mortgages, and the activity in the first half of 2015 was at increased levels due to the focus on the mortgage area as well as low mortgage rates. Market rates were significantly higher in the first half of 2014, namely the 10-year U.S. Treasury, which provides general guidance for mortgage pricing, averaged 2.69% compared to 2.07% in the first half of 2015. Management anticipates that gains should continue to increase throughout 2015 with an increased focus and resources deployed to grow the Corporation’s mortgage origination activity.

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, earnings on BOLI increased by $15,000, or 9.4%, and for the six months ended June 30, 2015, earnings on BOLI increased by $20,000, or 6.4%, compared to the same periods in 2014. Increases and decreases in BOLI income depend on insurance cost components on the Corporation’s BOLI policies, the actual annual return of the policies, and any benefits paid upon death that exceed the policy’s cash surrender value. Increases in cash surrender value are a function of the return of the policy net of all expenses. An additional investment of $2,500,000 was made into BOLI during the second quarter of 2015, resulting in the increased income for both the quarter and year-to-date periods.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The miscellaneous income category decreased by $52,000, or 39.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and by $49,000, or 20.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. The primary reason for the decrease was a decrease in income in the second quarter and year-to-date periods in 2015 related to the provision for off balance sheet credit losses. Larger reductions to this off balance sheet credit provision occurred in the second quarter of 2014 than the second quarter of 2015. The larger reduction in the second quarter of 2014 also caused the first six months of 2014 to reflect more miscellaneous income than the same period of 2015. This income decreased by $51,000 for the second quarter of 2015, and $12,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Additionally, losses on the sale of OREO totaled $20,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to gains of $9,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, making up the remainder of the year-to-date variance.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the second quarter of 2015 were $6,187,000, an increase of $398,000, or 6.9%, compared to the $5,789,000 for the second quarter of 2014. For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2015, operating expenses totaled $12,337,000, an increase of $750,000, or 6.5%, compared to the same period in 2014. The following tables provide details of the Corporation’s operating expenses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014.

OPERATING EXPENSES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014
	$		$		$			%
Salaries and employee benefits		3,674		3,481		193			5.5
Occupancy expenses		524		459		65			14.2
Equipment expenses		298		268		30			11.2
Advertising & marketing expenses		161		125		36			28.8
Computer software & data processing expenses		384		396		(12	)		(3.0	)
Bank shares tax		195		183		12			6.6
Professional services		437		353		84			23.8
Other operating expenses		514		524		(10	)		(1.9	)
Total Operating Expenses		6,187		5,789		398			6.9

OPERATING EXPENSES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Six Months Ended June 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014
	$		$		$			%
Salaries and employee benefits		7,376		6,911		465			6.7
Occupancy expenses		1,078		975		103			10.6
Equipment expenses		566		528		38			7.2
Advertising & marketing expenses		317		255		62			24.3
Computer software & data processing expenses		758		795		(37	)		(4.7	)
Bank shares tax		391		366		25			6.8
Professional services		754		680		74			10.9
Other operating expenses		1,097		1,077		20			1.9
Total Operating Expenses		12,337		11,587		750			6.5

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Salaries and employee benefits are the largest category of operating expenses. In general, they comprise 60% of the Corporation’s total operating expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, salaries and benefits increased $193,000, or 5.5%, from the same period in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, salaries and benefits increased $465,000, or 6.7%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Salaries increased by $134,000, or 5.2%, and employee benefits increased by $59,000, or 6.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, salary expense increased by $339,000, or 6.7%, while employee benefits increased by $126,000, or 6.9%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2014. Salary and benefit expenses are growing primarily because of the expansion of the mortgage division and one additional information systems position, along with three position upgrades, affecting three different areas of the Bank. The three position upgrades involved operations, commercial lending, and legal. Additional mortgage positions are planned for the second half of 2015 but these will be phased in based on higher mortgage volume levels.

Occupancy expenses consist of the following:

Depreciation of bank buildings

Real estate taxes and property insurance

Building lease expense

Utilities

Building repair and maintenance

Occupancy expenses increased $65,000, or 14.2%, and $103,000, or 10.6%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Lease expense increased by $17,000, or 150.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $34,000, or 148.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year due to the lease of additional office space in downtown Ephrata that occurred in the second quarter of 2014. Additional space was leased for loan operations, providing more room for commercial lending and the mortgage expansion at the main office location. Cleaning services were $34,000 for the second quarter of 2015 and $69,000 for the six-month period and are now being included in occupancy costs whereas in years prior to 2015 they were included with professional services.

Equipment expenses increased by $30,000, or 11.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $38,000, or 7.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Furniture and equipment depreciation costs increased by $25,000, or 14.8%, and $48,000, or 14.4%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Partially offsetting these increases, utilities costs decreased slightly for the quarter and by $17,000, or 5.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014, driven by a decrease in electricity costs. Equipment service contract expenses decreased by $14,000, or 18.8%, and $22,000, or 15.9%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014.

Advertising and marketing expenses increased $36,000, or 29.1%, and $62,000, or 24.2%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. These expenses can be further broken down into two categories, marketing expenses and public relations. The marketing expenses increased by $30,000, or 32.8%, and $44,000, or 24.4%, and the public relations expenses increased by $6,000, or 17.1%, and $18,000, or 24.1%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. Marketing expenses support the overall business strategies of the Corporation; therefore, the timing of these expenses is highly dependent upon the execution of those strategies.

Bank shares tax expense increased $12,000, or 6.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $25,000, or 6.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. In 2014, the PA Bank Shares Tax rate and formula was changed, resulting in a lower tax amount for the Corporation. Two main factors determine the amount of bank shares tax: the ending value of shareholders’ equity and the ending value of tax-exempt U.S. obligations. Previously, the shares tax calculation formula utilized a rolling six-year average of taxable shares, which was the average shareholders’ equity of the Bank less the average amount of exempt U.S. obligations held. In 2014 the shares tax rate was reduced from 1.25% to 0.89%. Additionally, the calculation was changed to using a year-end balance of shareholders’ equity, less tax-exempt U.S. obligations held at year-end. While, the rate and formula change reduced Bank shares tax in 2014, normal growth of Bank shareholders’ equity and slightly lower exempt U.S. obligations held, caused the shares tax to increase in 2015.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Professional services expense increased $84,000, or 23.8%, and $74,000, or 10.9%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. These services include accounting and auditing fees, legal fees, loan review fees, and fees for other third-party services. Legal fees increased by $27,000 for the quarter and $24,000 for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014 due to non-recurring fees associated with Corporate legal matters. Shareholder-related expenses increased by $16,000 and $12,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014 primarily due to a switch in registrar and transfer agents. Several other professional services expenses increased or decreased slightly making up the remainder of the variance.

Income Taxes

The majority of the Corporation’s income is taxed at a corporate rate of 34% for Federal income tax purposes. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Corporation recorded Federal income tax expense of $278,000 and $521,000, compared to tax expense of $347,000 and $746,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. The effective tax rate for the Corporation was 14.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and 14.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 16.6% and 17.3% for the same periods in 2014. The Corporation’s effective tax rate has historically been maintained at low levels primarily due to a relatively high level of tax-free municipal bonds held in the securities portfolio. The fluctuation of the effective tax rate will occur as a result of total tax-free revenue as a percentage of total revenue.

Certain items of income are not subject to Federal income tax, such as tax-exempt interest income on loans and securities, and BOLI income; therefore, the effective income tax rate for the Corporation is lower than the stated tax rate. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the Corporation’s provision for Federal income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Income by the income before income taxes for the applicable period.

The Corporation is also subject to Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax; however, the Corporation’s Holding Company has very limited taxable corporate net income activities. The Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ephrata National Bank, is subject to Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax. Like Federal Corporate income tax, the Pennsylvania Bank Shares Tax is a significant expense for the Corporation, amounting to $195,000 in the second quarter of 2015 and $391,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $183,000 and $366,000 for the same periods in 2014. The Bank Shares Tax expense appears on the Corporation’s Consolidated Statements of Income, under operating expenses.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Financial Condition

Securities Available for Sale

The Corporation classifies all of its securities as available for sale and reports the portfolio at fair value. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation had $296.1 million of securities available for sale, which accounted for 34.0% of assets, compared to 34.5% as of December 31, 2014, and 36.2% as of June 30, 2014. Based on ending balances, the securities portfolio decreased 3.8% from June 30, 2014, and increased 0.1% from December 31, 2014.

The securities portfolio was showing a net unrealized loss of $729,000 as of June 30, 2015, compared to an unrealized gain of $1,518,000 as of December 31, 2014, and an unrealized loss of $286,000 as of June 30, 2014. The valuation of the Corporation’s securities portfolio, predominately debt securities, is impacted by both the U.S. Treasury rates and the perceived forward direction of interest rates. Out of the three period-end dates noted above, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield was at its highest on June 30, 2014, at 2.53%. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield decreased to 2.17% as of December 31, 2014, but then increased again to 2.35% as of June 30, 2015. The likelihood of rates increasing further as of June 30, 2015, was impacting the valuation of the Corporation’s debt securities to a greater extent than it was a year earlier on June 30, 2014. The actual U.S. Treasury rates and forecasts for future interest rates will continue to impact the valuation of the Corporation’s debt securities.

The table below summarizes the Corporation’s cost, unrealized gain or loss position, and fair value for each sector of the securities available for sale portfolio for the periods ended June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014.

AMORTIZED COST AND FAIR VALUE OF SECURITIES HELD

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

			Net
	Amortized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains (Losses)			Value
	$		$			$
June 30, 2015
U.S. government agencies		34,568		(301	)		34,267
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		39,263		(204	)		39,059
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		60,728		(328	)		60,400
Corporate bonds		60,684		(375	)		60,309
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		96,028		449			96,477
Total debt securities		291,271		(759	)		290,512
Marketable equity securities		5,517		30			5,547
Total securities available for sale		296,788		(729	)		296,059

December 31, 2014
U.S. government agencies		46,577		(418	)		46,159
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		37,946		4			37,950
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		48,690		(624	)		48,066
Corporate bonds		65,274		(166	)		65,108
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		90,628		2,703			93,331
Total debt securities		289,115		1,499			290,614
Marketable equity securities		5,189		19			5,208
Total securities available for sale		294,304		1,518			295,822

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

			Net
	Amortized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains (Losses)			Value
	$		$			$
June 30, 2014
U.S. government agencies		38,865		(927	)		37,938
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		55,849		344			56,193
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		58,697		(628	)		58,069
Corporate bonds		46,996		16			47,012
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		102,358		901			103,259
Total debt securities		302,765		(294	)		302,471
Marketable equity securities		5,318		8			5,326
Total securities available for sale		308,083		(286	)		307,797

While interest rate changes and the perceived forward direction of interest rates generally have a close relationship to the valuation of the Corporation’s fixed income securities portfolio, there are also a number of other market factors that impact bond prices. While there is still an expectation of a Federal Reserve rate increase in late 2015, at present market interest rates remain compressed and have been range bound, operating in a fairly narrow range over the last twelve months. While any market rate increase would have a negative impact on the Corporation’s debt securities, the impact will vary according to the length and structure of each sector. It is not known when the Federal Reserve does act to increase the Fed funds rate, how mid-term and long-term rates will react. While management is planning for these rates to also increase, it is possible they would not increase to the same magnitude that short-term rates will increase. Therefore a flatter yield curve could develop. With the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield at 2.35% as of June 30, 2015, any significant increase in this rate would have a negative impact on the Corporation’s obligations of states and political subdivisions, referred to as municipal bonds. The municipal bond sector is the largest of the portfolio and as a result management will closely monitor the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield due to its impact on these securities. The other sectors of the portfolio have shorter lives and duration and would be more influenced by the 2-year and 5-year U.S. Treasury rates. It is anticipated that the current unrealized losses will increase further when market rates do begin to increase, either in anticipation of a Federal Reserve rate move, or after the Federal rate move.

Management has already taken steps to reduce the Corporation’s exposure to increases in interest rates and declines in the market valuation of the securities portfolio. These actions have included the sales of longer duration securities, primarily municipal bonds. Those actions are part of a broader asset liability plan to continually work to mitigate future interest rate risk and fair value risk to the Corporation. Part of that strategy is to retain higher levels of cash and cash equivalents to increase liquidity and provide an immediate hedge against higher interest rates and fair value risk. However, despite taking actions to mitigate the Corporation’s future risk, these risks are inherent to the banking model. Unrealized gains and losses on securities will vary significantly according to market forces. Management’s focus will continue to be on the long-term performance of these securities. While management has and will continue to take gains from the portfolio when opportunities exist, the broader securities strategy remains to buy and hold securities.

The Corporation typically invests excess liquidity into securities, primarily fixed-income bonds. The securities portfolio provides interest and dividend income to supplement the interest income on loans. Additionally, the securities portfolio assists in the management of both liquidity risk and interest rate risk. In order to provide maximum flexibility for management of liquidity and interest rate risk, the securities portfolio is classified as available for sale and reported at fair value. Management adjusts the value of all the Corporation’s securities on a monthly basis to fair market value as determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Management has the ability and intent to hold all debt securities until maturity, and does not generally record impairment on bonds that are currently valued below book value. In addition to the fixed-income bonds, the Corporation’s equity holdings consist of a small CRA-qualified mutual fund with a book value of $5.0 million. The CRA fund is a Small Business Association (SBA) variable rate fund with a stable dollar price. The Corporation also has a small portfolio of bank stocks with a book value of $517,000. These equity holdings make up 1.9% of the Corporation’s securities available for sale.

All securities, bonds, and equity holdings are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis. Should any impairment occur, management would write down the security to a fair market value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, with the amount of the write down recorded as a loss on securities.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Each quarter, management sets portfolio allocation guidelines and adjusts the security portfolio strategy generally based on the following factors:

ALCO positions as to liquidity, credit risk, interest rate risk, and fair value risk

Growth of the loan portfolio

Slope of the U.S. Treasury curve

Relative performance of the various instruments, including spread to U.S. Treasuries

Duration and average length of the portfolio

Volatility of the portfolio

Direction of interest rates

Economic factors impacting debt securities

The investment policy of the Corporation imposes guidelines to ensure diversification within the portfolio. The diversity specifications provide opportunities to shorten or lengthen duration, maximize yield, and mitigate credit risk. The composition of the securities portfolio based on fair market value is shown in the following table.

SECURITIES PORTFOLIO

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Period Ending
	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014				June 30, 2014
	$		%		$		%		$		%

U.S. government agencies		34,267		11.5		46,159		15.6		38,865		12.6
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities		39,059		13.2		37,950		12.8		55,849		18.1
U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations		60,400		20.4		48,066		16.2		58,697		19.1
Corporate debt securities		60,309		20.4		65,108		22.0		46,996		15.3
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		96,477		32.6		93,331		31.6		102,358		33.2
Equity securities		5,547		1.9		5,208		1.8		5,318		1.7

Total securities		296,059		100.0		295,822		100.0		308,083		100.0

The largest movements within the securities portfolio were shaped by market factors, such as:

slope of the U.S. Treasury curve and projected forward rates

interest spread versus U.S. Treasury rates on the various securities

pricing of the instruments, including supply and demand for the product

structure of the instruments, including duration and average life

portfolio weightings versus policy guidelines

prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations

risk-based capital considerations

Federal income tax considerations with regard to obligations of states and political subdivisions.

Since June of 2014, the most significant change occurring in the Corporation’s securities portfolio was a decrease in U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) with an offsetting increase in corporate debt securities. While MBS securities provide a stable ladder of cash flows, the lack of a structure to limit prepayment speeds makes these securities susceptible to lower yields on any rate declines. The volatility of MBS prepayment speeds has caused management to not reinvest in this area. On the other hand, corporate securities provide strong yields for short maturity instruments, with no variation in yield performance. Corporate securities are viewed as key to maintaining the 0 to 5-year portion of the portfolio’s maturity ladder, so a steady stream of reinvestment would occur at higher rates given a future rates-up cycle. The more significant components of the securities portfolio along with a more detailed explanation of their changes are discussed below.

The Corporation’s U.S. government agency sector decreased by $4.6 million, or 11.8%, since June 30, 2014, but only saw the weighting reduced from 12.6% of the portfolio to 11.5%. Generally, management’s goal is to maintain agency securities at approximately 15% of the investment portfolio. Management does plan to reinvest in the Agency sector and increase the weighting going forward. Management will gauge reinvestment based on market opportunities and desires to maintain a minimum sector weighting. This sector is also important in maintaining adequate risk weightings of the portfolio, to ensure sufficient U.S. government securities for pledging purposes, and importantly to ladder out a schedule of agency and corporate maturities over the next 5 years to avoid any concentration of maturities. Next to U.S. Treasuries, U.S. agencies are viewed as the safest instruments and are considered by management as foundational to the portfolio.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The Corporation’s U.S. agency MBS and CMO sectors have decreased in total by $15.1 million, or 13.2%, since June 30, 2014. These two security types both consist of mortgage instruments that pay monthly interest and principal, however the behavior of the two types vary according to the structure of the mortgage pool or CMO instrument. Management desires to maintain a substantial amount of MBS and CMOs in order to assist in adding to and maintaining a stable five-year ladder of cash flows, which is important in providing stable liquidity and interest rate risk positions. Unlike the typical U.S. agency paper, corporate bonds, and obligations of states and political subdivisions, which only pay principal at final maturity, the U.S. agency MBS and CMO securities pay contractual monthly principal and interest, but are also subject to additional prepayment of principal. The combined effect of all of these instruments paying monthly principal and interest provides the Corporation with a significant and reasonably stable cash flow. Cash flows coming off of MBS and CMOs do slow down and speed up as interest rates increase or decrease, which has an impact on the portfolio’s length and yield. As interest rates decline, prepayment of principal on securities increases, the duration of the security shortens, and the yield declines as more amortization is required on premium bonds. When interest rates increase, the opposite of this occurs. Despite the fluctuations that occur in terms of monthly cash flow as a result of changing prepayment speeds, the monthly cash flow generated by U.S. agency MBS and CMO securities as a group is significant, and helps to soften or smooth out the Corporation’s total monthly cash flow from all securities. As a result of the volatility of MBS prepayment speeds, management has shifted the MBS/CMO allocation to a heavier weighting of CMOs in this combined sector.

As of June 30, 2015, the fair value of the Corporation’s corporate bonds increased by $13.3 million, or 28.3%, from balances at June 30, 2014. Like any security, corporate bonds have both positive and negative qualities and management must evaluate these securities on a risk versus reward basis. Corporate bonds add diversity to the portfolio and provide strong yields for short maturities; however, by their very nature, corporate bonds carry a high level of credit risk should the entity experience financial difficulties. Management stands to possibly lose the entire principal amount if the entity that issued the corporate paper fails. As a result of the higher level of credit risk taken by purchasing a corporate bond, management has in place procedures to closely analyze the financial health of the company as well as policy guidelines. The guidelines include both maximum investment by issuer and minimal credit ratings that must be met in order for management to purchase a corporate bond. Financial analysis is conducted prior to every corporate bond purchase with ongoing monitoring performed on all securities held.

Obligations of states and political subdivisions, or municipal bonds, are tax-free securities that generally provide the highest yield in the securities portfolio. They also carry the longest duration on average of any instrument in the securities portfolio. In the prolonged period of historically low interest rates, the municipal bond sector has far outperformed all other sectors of the portfolio. Municipal tax-equivalent yields generally start well above other taxable bonds and these instruments experience significant fair market value gains when interest rates are low and market value losses when interest rates are higher. The market value of municipal holdings has declined from $102.4 million at June 30, 2014, to $96.5 million at June 30, 2015, a $5.9 million, or 5.8% decrease.

By policy, management is to identify and recommend whether to hold or sell securities with credit ratings that have fallen below minimum policy credit ratings required at the time of purchase, or below investment grade. Management monitors the security ratings on a monthly basis and reviews quarterly with the Board of Directors. Management, with Board approval, determines whether it is in the Corporation’s best interest to continue to hold any security that has fallen below policy guidelines or below investment grade based on the expectation of recovery of market value or improved performance. At this time management has elected, and the Board has approved, holding securities that have fallen below initial policy guidelines or investment grade.

As of March 31, 2014, the Corporation held three PCMO securities with an amortized cost of $3.9 million. In the second quarter of 2014, all of the PCMO securities were sold as a result of more favorable market conditions and the ability to sell out of this security sector with minimal losses. Two of the three PCMOs sold during 2014 had below-investment-grade credit ratings and required impairment charges over the past number of years. With no securities remaining in this sector, the Corporation will no longer need to conduct quarterly impairment analysis on these securities and will save time on the administrative costs to continue to account for these PCMOs.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

As of June 30, 2015, twenty-two of the forty corporate securities held by the Corporation showed an unrealized holding loss. These securities with unrealized holding losses were valued at 98.8% of book value. The Corporation’s investment policy requires that corporate bonds have a minimum credit rating of A3 by Moody’s or A- by S&P or Fitch at the time of purchase, or an average or composite rating of A-. As of June 30, 2015, all but two of the corporate bonds had at least one A3 or A- rating by one of the major credit rating services. The two unrelated corporate bonds, with a total book value of $2.2 million, did not have an A3 or A- rating as of June 30, 2015. These bonds were both rated Moody’s Baa1 and S&P BBB+, which are two levels above the minimum required to be considered investment grade. Management conducts ongoing monitoring of these bonds and has chosen to continue to hold these bonds. As of June 30, 2015, there were five corporate bonds with $8.5 million of par value that were carrying split ratings with one rating within policy limit and another rating below the initial policy purchase requirement but above investment grade. These securities are monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure these credits do not deteriorate further and remain at investment grade. Currently, there are no indications that any of these bonds would discontinue contractual payments.

The Corporation’s investment policy requires that municipal bonds not carrying insurance have a minimum credit rating of A3 by Moody’s or A- by S&P or Fitch at the time of purchase. As of June 30, 2015, no municipal bonds carried a credit rating under these levels.

In the current environment, the major rating services have tightened their credit underwriting procedures and are more apt to downgrade municipalities. Additionally, the very weak economy has reduced revenue streams for many municipalities and has called into question the basic premise that municipalities have unlimited power to tax, i.e. the ability to raise taxes to compensate for revenue shortfalls. As a result of this environment, management utilizes several municipal surveillance reports and engages a third party to perform enhanced municipal credit evaluation. Management will typically sell municipal securities if negative trends in financial performance are found and/or ratings have declined to levels deemed unacceptable. As a result of the above monitoring and actions taken to proactively sell weaker municipal credits, the Corporation’s entire municipal bond portfolio consists of investment grade credits.

The entire securities portfolio is reviewed monthly for credit risk and evaluated quarterly for possible impairment. With the sale of all remaining PCMO securities in 2014, the Corporation’s municipal and corporate bonds present the largest credit risk and highest likelihood for any possible impairment. Due to the ability for corporate credit situations to change rapidly and the continued weak economic conditions impacting municipalities, management is closely monitoring all corporate and municipal securities.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Loans

Net loans outstanding increased by 8.3%, to $477.6 million at June 30, 2015, from $441.2 million at June 30, 2014. Net loans increased by 2.9%, an annualized rate of 5.8%, from $464.0 million at December 31, 2014. The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014.

LOANS BY MAJOR CATEGORY

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30,					December 31,					June 30,
	2015					2014					2014
	$			%		$			%		$			%

Commercial real estate
Commercial mortgages		95,009			19.6		95,914			20.4		95,354			21.3
Agriculture mortgages		150,380			31.1		140,322			29.8		129,751			29.0
Construction		7,823			1.6		7,387			1.6		8,507			1.9
Total commercial real estate		253,212			52.3		243,623			51.8		233,612			52.2

Consumer real estate (a)
1-4 family residential mortgages		122,642			25.3		123,395			26.2		123,039			27.5
Home equity loans		12,007			2.5		12,563			2.7		9,994			2.2
Home equity lines of credit		30,482			6.3		27,308			5.8		24,158			5.4
Total consumer real estate		165,131			34.1		163,266			34.7		157,191			35.1

Commercial and industrial
Commercial and industrial		33,046			6.8		31,998			6.8		27,891			6.2
Tax-free loans		12,843			2.7		11,806			2.5		12,573			2.8
Agriculture loans		16,455			3.4		16,496			3.5		12,757			2.9
Total commercial and industrial		62,344			12.9		60,300			12.8		53,221			11.9

Consumer		3,606			0.7		3,517			0.7		3,723			0.8

Total loans		484,293			100.0		470,706			100.0		447,747			100.0
Less:
Deferred loan fees (costs), net		(510	)				(462	)				(403	)
Allowance for loan losses		7,249					7,141					6,968
Total net loans		477,554					464,027					441,182

(a)	Residential real estate loans do not include mortgage loans serviced for others which totaled $26,631,000 as of June 30, 2015, $16,670,000 as of December 31, 2014, and $8,138,000 as of June 30, 2014.

Since June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2014, loan growth occurred as a result of increases in agriculture mortgages, home equity lines of credit, and commercial and industrial loans. Agricultural lending has been an area of increased focus for the Corporation. The agricultural sector of the local economy has recovered much quicker than other elements such as construction, manufacturing, and service-related industries. Home equity lines of credit have grown in response to the low interest rate environment encouraging customers to utilize variable rate consumer borrowings in conjunction with several home equity specials that the Corporation has offered during 2014 and 2015. Commercial and industrial loan growth has occurred as a result of more businesses moving forward with loan needs as a result of slightly improved economic conditions and improved performance compared to prior years.

The composition of the loan portfolio has undergone relatively minor changes in recent years outside of the increases mentioned above. The total of all categories of real estate loans comprises 86% of total loans. At $253.2 million, commercial real estate is the largest category of the loan portfolio, consisting of 52.3% of total loans. This category includes commercial mortgages, agriculture mortgages, and construction loans. Commercial real estate loans increased from $233.6 million as of June 30, 2014, to $253.2 million as of June 30, 2015, a $19.6 million, or 8.4% increase.

The growth in commercial real estate loans has occurred entirely in those secured by farmland. Agricultural mortgages increased from $129.8 million, or 55.6% of commercial real estate loans as of June 30, 2014, to $150.4 million, or 59.4% of commercial real estate loans as of June 30, 2015. Commercial mortgages and commercial construction loans did not change significantly since June 30, 2014, or December 31, 2014.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Consumer real estate loans make up 34.1% of the total loan portfolio with balances of $165.1 million. These loans include 1-4 family residential mortgages, home equity term loans, and home equity lines of credit. Personal residential mortgages account for 74.3% of total residential real estate loans and 25.3% of total loans. Traditional 10 to 20-year personal mortgages originated from and held by the Corporation have consistently been the largest single product of the Corporation’s loan portfolio. The Corporation experienced a slowdown in the number of residential mortgages made and held at the Bank in 2014 and into 2015, as the secondary mortgage market rates became extremely competitive and more customers were opting for this alternative. This activity drove gains on mortgages higher for the year, but did contribute to the decrease in outstanding balance of mortgages that were held on the Corporation’s balance sheet. Total personal residential mortgage balances decreased $0.4 million, or 0.3%, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015, and $0.8 million, or 0.6%, from December 31, 2014, to June 30, 2015.

The Corporation generally only holds 10, 15, and 20-year mortgages, and will sell any mortgage originated over 20 years. While terms of 10, 15, 20, and 30 years are offered to the customer, the most popular term is the 30-year, which are all sold on the secondary market. The majority of the 30-year mortgages are sold with servicing retained. As customers look to refinance mortgages that are held on the Corporation’s balance sheet, many are taking advantage of the lower rates offered on the secondary market resulting in the conversion of the Corporation’s residential mortgages into mortgages sold on the secondary market. The new mortgages that the Corporation initiated during the six months ended June 30, 2015, were not enough to offset the normal amortization and paydowns of the existing portfolio of mortgages, which were higher than normal as a result of low market interest rates. Management expects internal mortgage loan production to improve throughout the remainder of 2015 as the Corporation focuses on strategically growing this area of the portfolio.

Second mortgages and home equity loans, fixed or variable rate, make up the remainder of the Corporation’s residential real estate loans. Requests for fixed-rate home equity loans have slowed in the current environment, while home equity lines of credit, which float on the Prime rate, have increased. From June 30, 2014, to June 30, 2015, fixed rate home equity loans have increased from $10.0 million to $12.0 million, a $2.0 million, or 20.0% increase. Home equity lines of credit increased from $24.2 million to $30.5 million, a $6.3 million, or 26.0% increase. The net of these two trends is an $8.3 million, or 24.3% increase, in total home equity loan balances.

The Corporation offered home equity loan specials during 2014 and 2015 that initiated growth in the variable rate line of credit area. Consumers are seeking the lowest interest rate to borrow money against their home value, which has resulted in more variable rate versus fixed rate financing. This trend is likely to continue while the Prime rate remains at 3.25%. It is expected that when the Federal Reserve acts to increase the overnight rate, and the Prime rate increases, the reaction will be that floating rate loans will become less attractive to borrowers who will act to protect themselves against further rate increases by converting to a fixed rate loan. Management anticipates moderate growth in the residential real estate area throughout the remainder of 2015 as this area is an area of strategic focus for the Corporation.

Commercial loans not secured by real estate are significantly smaller than the Corporation’s commercial loans secured by real estate portfolio. These loans are generally extended based on the health of the commercial borrower. They include both fixed rate loans and Prime-based variable rate loans. The variable rate loans are generally in the form of a business line of credit. The Corporation’s security position as to these loans can be further strengthened by obtaining the personal guarantees of the owners. This is a preferred approach to commercial accounts as it allows the Corporation to pursue assets of the owner in addition to assets of the commercial entity. Management can also obtain additional collateral by securing the inventory of the business. The portfolio of all types of commercial and industrial loans showed an increase of $9.1 million, or 17.1%, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, this category of commercial loans was made up of $33.0 million of commercial and industrial loans, $12.8 million of tax-free loans, and $16.5 million of agriculture loans. In the case of the Corporation, all of the $12.8 million of tax-free loans are to local municipalities. Commercial and industrial agriculture loans increased by $3.7 million, or 28.9%, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015, while other non-real estate secured commercial and industrial purpose loans were up from $27.9 million as of June 30, 2014, to $33.0 million as of June 30, 2015, a $5.1 million, or 18.3% increase.

The consumer loan portfolio decreased to $3.6 million at June 30, 2015, from $3.7 million at June 30, 2014. Consumer loans made up 0.8% of total loans on June 30, 2014, and 0.7% of total loans on June 30, 2015. The long-term trend over the past decade has seen homeowners turning to the equity in their homes to finance cars and education rather than traditional consumer loans for those expenditures. Slightly higher demand for unsecured credit is being offset by principal payments on existing loans. Management anticipates that the Corporation’s level of consumer loans will likely be relatively unchanged in the near future, as the need for additional unsecured credit in the current weaker economic conditions is generally offset by those borrowers wishing to reduce debt levels and move away from the higher cost of unsecured financing relative to other forms of real estate secured financing.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include:

Nonaccrual loans

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing

Troubled debt restructurings

Other real estate owned

NON-PERFORMING ASSETS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
	2015		2014		2014
	$		$		$

Nonaccrual loans		521		967		969
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing		390		384		294
Troubled debt restructurings		—		—		—
Total non-performing loans		911		1,351		1,263

Other real estate owned		64		69		56

Total non-performing assets		975		1,420		1,319

Non-performing assets to net loans		0.20%		0.31%		0.30%

The total balance of non-performing assets decreased by $344,000, or 26.1%, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015, and by $445,000, or 31.3%, from December 31, 2014 to June 30, 2015. The decrease from the prior year’s period was due to a decrease in nonaccrual loans, which was partially offset by a small increase in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing. The decrease since December 31, 2014, was due to a decrease in nonaccrual loans due to a charged-off commercial loan relationship in the first quarter of 2015. The Corporation remains very low versus the peer group with a 0.20% non-performing asset ratio. There were no loans classified as a TDR as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, or June 30, 2014. Management is monitoring delinquency trends and the level of non-performing loans closely in light of the slightly improved but continued weak economic conditions. At this time, management believes that the potential for material losses related to non-performing loans is low with the level of non-performing and classified loans declining from the higher levels experienced in prior years.

Other real estate owned (OREO) is shown at the lower of cost or fair market value, net of anticipated selling costs. As of June 30, 2014, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2015, the OREO balance consisted of one residential property, although it was not the same borrower or property at the end of these periods. The property held at June 30, 2014, with a $56,000 fair market value was sold during the fourth quarter of 2014. A new property with a fair market value of $69,000 was held as of December 31, 2014, but sold in the first quarter of 2015. The property held at June 30, 2015, had a fair market value, less anticipated selling costs, of $64,000 with sale scheduled to occur during the third quarter of 2015.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established to cover any losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance each quarter based upon a detailed analysis and calculation of the allowance for loan losses. This calculation is based upon a systematic methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The calculation includes estimates and is based upon losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance calculation includes specific provisions for under-performing loans and general allocations to cover anticipated losses on all loan types based on historical losses. The calculation is also influenced by nine qualitative factors that are adjusted on a quarterly basis as needed. Based on the quarterly loan loss calculation, management will adjust the allowance for loan losses through the provision as necessary. Changes to the allowance for loan losses during the year are primarily affected by five main factors:

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Historical loan losses

Qualitative factor adjustments including levels of delinquent and non-performing loans

Growth trends of the loan portfolio

Recovery of loans previously charged off

Provision for loan losses

Strong credit and collateral policies have been instrumental in producing a favorable history of loan losses. The Allowance for Loan Losses table below shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014. At the bottom of the table, two benchmark percentages are shown. The first is net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding for the year. The second is the total allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015		2014
	$		$

Balance at January 1,		7,141		7,219
Loans charged off:
Real estate		272		—
Commercial and industrial		2		—
Consumer		4		15
Total charged off		278		15

Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Real estate		3		5
Commercial and industrial		81		59
Consumer		2		—
Total recovered		86		64
Net loans (recovered) charged off		192		(49	)

Provision charged (credited) to operating expense		300		(300	)

Balance at June 30,		7,249		6,968

Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a % of average total loans outstanding		0.04%		(0.01%	)

Allowance at end of period as a % of total loans		1.50%		1.55%

Charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2015, were $278,000, compared to $15,000 for the same period in 2014. Management typically charges off unsecured debt over 90 days delinquent with little likelihood of recovery. In the first six months of 2015, there was one commercial real estate loan that was charged off for $272,000 making up the majority of this balance. In the first six months of 2014, only $15,000 in charge-offs occurred in the form of four small consumer loans. This resulted in the increased level of charge-offs in the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same period in the prior year.

The allowance as a percentage of total loans represents the portion of the total loan portfolio for which an allowance has been provided. Management regularly reviews the overall risk profile of the loan portfolio and the impact that current economic trends have on the Corporation’s loans. The financial industry typically evaluates the quality of loans on a scale with “unclassified” representing healthy loans, “special mention” being the first indication of credit concern, and several successive classified ratings indicating further credit declines of “substandard,” “doubtful,” and, ultimately, “loss.”

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The Corporation’s total classified loans based on outstanding balances were $14.0 million as of June 30, 2015, $19.6 million as of December 31, 2014, and $17.5 million as of June 30, 2014. Having more loans in a classified status will result in a higher allowance as higher projected historical losses and qualitative factors are attached to these loans. In addition to this impact, management performs a specific allocation test on these classified loans. As of December 31, 2014, there was a specifically allocated allowance amount of $1,000 against the classified loans, but no specifically allocated allowance was required as of June 30, 2014, or June 30, 2015. While the level of classified loans could have a significant bearing on the allowance, currently they are not having a material influence. The classified loans could require larger provision amounts due to a higher potential risk of loss, so as the classified loan balances fluctuate, the associated specific allowance applied to them fluctuates, resulting in a lower or higher required allowance. The Corporation’s level of classified loans is down significantly from several years ago with steady declines since 2011 as well as a decline from balances at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014.

The net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans outstanding indicates the percentage of the Corporation’s total loan portfolio that has been charged off during the period, after reducing charge-offs by recoveries. The Corporation continues to experience very low net charge-off percentages due to strong credit practices. For the first six months of 2015, net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans outstanding was 0.04%, which is higher than the previous year when a net recovery position resulted in a ratio of (0.01%), but is still running at a very low historical level. Management continually monitors delinquencies, classified loans, and charge-off activity closely, and is not anticipating significant increases throughout the remainder of 2015. Management practices are in place to reduce the number and severity of losses. In regard to severely delinquent loans, management attempts to improve the Corporation’s collateral or credit position and, in the case of a loan workout, intervene to minimize additional charge-offs.

The allowance as a percentage of total loans was 1.50% as of June 30, 2015, 1.52% as of December 31, 2014, and 1.55% as of June 30, 2014. Management anticipates that the rate of decline in the allowance percentage will slow during the remainder of 2015, as the allowance balance is increased with additional provision expense. It is typical for the allowance for loan losses to contain a small amount of excess reserves. Management desires that the amount of excess reserve in the allowance for loan losses be maintained between 5% and 10%. At the end of each of the four quarters in 2014, the excess was at 8% or above and as of June 30, 2015, the excess reserve stood at 7.8%.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, decreased by $0.6 million, or 2.7%, to $22.0 million as of June 30, 2015, from $22.6 million as of June 30, 2014 as more depreciation on fixed assets occurred than the amount of new assets placed into service. As of June 30, 2015, $102,000 was classified as construction in process compared to $120,000 as of June 30, 2014.

Regulatory Stock

The Corporation owns multiple forms of regulatory stock that is required in order to be a member of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and members of banks such as the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (ACBB). The Corporation’s $4.0 million of regulatory stock holdings as of June 30, 2015, consisted of $3.8 million of FHLB of Pittsburgh stock, $151,000 of FRB stock, and $37,000 of ACBB stock. All of these stocks are valued at a stable dollar price, which is the price used to purchase or liquidate shares; therefore, the investment is carried at book value and there is no fair market value adjustment.

The Corporation’s investment in FHLB stock is required for membership in the organization. The amount of stock required is highly dependent upon the relative size of outstanding borrowings from FHLB and the mortgages the Corporation sells to FHLB. The Corporation participates in the FHLB Mortgage Partnership Finance (MPF) program, where mortgages originated by the Bank are sold to FHLB, servicing retained, with an element of credit risk also maintained by the Bank. Each time a mortgage is sold to FHLB, the Corporation is required to purchase capital stock in the amount of 4% of the mortgage. This requirement is causing the Corporation’s capital stock requirement to increase more than the amount required when FHLB borrowings are obtained. Excess stock is typically repurchased quarterly by FHLB from the Corporation at par based on the amount of borrowings and mortgages outstanding. The Corporation’s FHLB stock position was $3.8 million on June 30, 2015, and June 30, 2014, with no excess capital stock position. Since FHLB MPF mortgage volume is on the rise, any future stock repurchases would generally be the result of lower borrowing balances.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The FHLB of Pittsburgh has paid a quarterly dividend since the resumption of their dividend in the first quarter of 2012. Most recently the dividend yield was 5.00% annualized on activity stock and 3.00% annualized on membership stock for the second quarter of 2015. Most of the Corporation’s dividend is based on the activity stock, which is based on the amount of borrowings and mortgage activity with FHLB. In addition to the normal quarterly dividend, the FHLB paid a special dividend in the first quarter of 2015 due to their record earnings and strong financial position as of December 31, 2014. Management continues to monitor the financial condition of the FHLB quarterly to assess its ability to continue to regularly repurchase excess capital stock and pay a dividend.

Management believes that the FHLB will continue to be a primary source of wholesale liquidity for both short-term and long-term funding. Management’s strategy in terms of future use of FHLB borrowings is addressed under the Borrowings section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Deposits

The Corporation’s total ending deposits increased by $2.9 million, or 0.4%, and $18.8 million, or 2.8%, from December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, respectively. Customer deposits are the Corporation’s primary source of funding for loans and securities. In the past few years, the economic concerns and volatility of the equity market led customers back to banks for safe places to invest money, despite historically low interest rates. The mix of the Corporation’s deposit categories has changed moderately since June 30, 2014, with the changes being a $24.7 million, or 13.5% increase, in non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts, a $1.0 million, or 10.0% increase, in interest bearing demand deposits, a $0.8 million, or 0.9% increase, in NOW accounts, a $3.2 million, or 4.9% increase, in money market balances, and a $12.7 million, or 9.8% increase, in savings account balances. Partially offsetting these increases, time deposits decreased by $23.4 million, or 11.3%, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015.

The increase in non-interest bearing demand accounts and savings account balances is the result of historically low interest rates, which have resulted in little difference between savings rates and other core deposit rates and even short-term time deposit rates. Customers view demand deposits and savings as the safest, most convenient place to maintain funds for maximum flexibility. Management believes these deposit account types will continue to hold higher balances until short-term interest rates increase.

The Deposits by Major Classification table, shown below, provides the balances of each category for June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014.

DEPOSITS BY MAJOR CLASSIFICATION

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
	2015		2014		2014
	$		$		$

Non-interest bearing demand		207,826		210,444		183,149
Interest bearing demand		10,446		14,039		9,494
NOW accounts		80,571		72,951		79,818
Money market deposit accounts		67,843		69,442		64,692
Savings accounts		142,350		131,206		129,659
Time deposits		183,863		191,927		207,258
Brokered time deposits		9,651		9,642		9,631
Total deposits		702,550		699,651		683,701

The growth and mix of deposits is often driven by several factors including:

Convenience and service provided

Current rates paid on deposits relative to competitor rates

Level of fees on deposit products

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Level of and perceived direction of interest rates

Financial condition and perceived safety of the institution

Relative performance and risks associated with other investment opportunities

The Corporation has been a stable presence in the local area and offers convenient locations as well as competitive service fees and interest rates because of a strong commitment to the customers and the communities that it serves. Management has always priced products and services in a manner that makes them affordable for all customers. This in turn creates a high degree of customer loyalty and a stable deposit base. Additionally, as financial institutions have come under increased scrutiny from both regulators and customers, the Corporation has maintained an outstanding reputation. The Corporation’s deposit base increased as a result of customers seeking a longstanding, reliable institution as a partner to meet their financial needs.

Time deposits are typically a more rate-sensitive product, making them a source of funding that is prone to balance variations depending on the interest rate environment and how the Corporation’s time deposit rates compare with the local market rates. Time deposits fluctuate as consumers search for the best rates in the market, with less allegiance to any particular financial institution. As of June 30, 2015, time deposit balances, excluding brokered deposits, had decreased $8.1 million, or 4.2%, and $23.4 million, or 11.3%, from December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The Corporation has experienced a slow and steady shift in deposit trends over the past five years as customers have moved money from time deposits into core checking and savings accounts. With minimal differences between shorter term CD rates and interest bearing non-maturity deposits, customers are more inclined to accumulate their funds in a liquid account that can be accessed at any time. This has resulted in declining time deposit balances and more significant growth in the core deposit areas. Management anticipates that the recent declines in time deposits will likely continue until interest rates increase and cause more of a separation between longer-term rates and overnight rates.

Time deposits have FDIC insurance coverage insuring no loss of principal up to $250,000 per account, based on certain account structures. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the $250,000 FDIC insurance coverage on all deposit accounts was made permanent. This has caused an increase in the percentage of time deposits over $100,000 held by the Corporation. While total time deposits continue to decline in the present environment, the percentage of time deposits over $100,000 compared to total time deposits has increased and is expected to remain at these higher percentages due to the FDIC coverage. Time deposits in their entirety have decreased and are expected to further decline until the Federal Reserve acts to increase short term interest rates.

Borrowings

Total borrowings were $72.0 million, $62.3 million, and $74.6 million as of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, respectively. Of these amounts, $4.9 million and $5.4 million reflect short term funds at June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively. The Corporation had no short-term funds borrowed as of December 31, 2014. Short-term funds are used for immediate liquidity needs and are not typically part of an ongoing liquidity or interest rate risk strategy; therefore, they fluctuate more rapidly. When short term funds are used, they are purchased through correspondent and member bank relationships as overnight borrowings or through the FHLB for terms less than one year.

Total long-term borrowings, borrowings initiated for terms longer than one year, were $67.1 million as of June 30, 2015, $62.3 million as of December 31, 2014, and $69.2 million as of June 30, 2014. The Corporation uses two main sources for long-term borrowings: FHLB advances and repurchase agreements obtained through brokers. The repurchase agreement portion of the long-term debt was $5.0 million at June 30, 2015, $10.0 million at December 31, 2014, and $15.0 million at June 30, 2014. FHLB long-term advances were $62.1 million at June 30, 2015, $52.3 million at December 31, 2014, and $54.2 million at June 30, 2014. Both FHLB advances and repurchase agreements are used as a secondary source of funding and to mitigate interest rate risk. These long-term funding instruments are typically a more manageable funding source in regard to amount, timing, and rate for interest rate risk and liquidity purposes compared to deposits. Over the course of the past few years, the Corporation has minimally changed the ladder of long-term FHLB borrowings, by replacing maturing advances with new long-term advances at significant rate savings. In the current interest rate environment, management has preferred to seek new long-term borrowings from FHLB rather than through repurchase agreements. Management will continue to analyze and compare the costs and benefits of borrowing versus obtaining funding from deposits.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

In order to limit the Corporation’s exposure and reliance to a single funding source, the Corporation’s Asset Liability Policy sets a goal of maintaining the amount of borrowings from the FHLB to 15% of asset size. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation was significantly under this policy guideline at 7.7% of asset size with $67.0 million of total FHLB borrowings. The Corporation also has a policy that limits total borrowings from all sources to 150% of the Corporation’s capital. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation was significantly under this policy guideline at 77.7% of capital with $72.0 million total borrowings from all sources. The Corporation has maintained FHLB borrowings and total borrowings well within these policy guidelines throughout all of 2014 and through the first six months of 2015.

The Corporation continues to be well under the FHLB maximum borrowing capacity (MBC), which is currently $277.3 million. The Corporation’s two internal policy limits mentioned above are far more restrictive than the FHLB MBC, which is calculated and set quarterly by FHLB.

Stockholders’ Equity

Federal regulatory authorities require banks to meet minimum capital levels. The Corporation maintains capital ratios well above those minimum levels and higher than the Corporation’s national peer group average. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation was in the 66^th percentile in tier 1 risk-based capital to risk weighted assets and in the 67^th percentile in total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets, based on the national Uniform Bank Performance Report (UBPR). The Bank’s tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets stood at 15.4% compared to 14.5% for the peer group. The Bank’s total capital to risk-weighted assets was 16.7% compared to the peer group average of 15.6%. The risk-weighted capital ratios are calculated by dividing capital by total risk-weighted assets. Regulatory guidelines determine the risk-weighted assets by assigning assets to specific risk-weighted categories. The calculation of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted average assets does not include an add-back to capital for the amount of the allowance for loan losses, thereby making this ratio lower than the total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio.

The following tables reflect the capital ratios for the Corporation and Bank compared to the regulatory capital requirements.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS:

			Regulatory Requirements
			Adequately		Well
As of June 30, 2015	Capital Ratios		Capitalized		Capitalized
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		16.8%		8.0%		10.0%
Bank		16.7%		8.0%		10.0%

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		15.5%		6.0%		8.0%
Bank		15.4%		6.0%		8.0%

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		10.8%		4.5%		6.5%
Bank		10.7%		4.5%		6.5%

Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets
Consolidated		10.8%		4.0%		5.0%
Bank		10.7%		4.0%		5.0%

As of December 31, 2014
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		17.3%		8.0%		10.0%
Bank		17.2%		8.0%		10.0%

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		16.1%		4.0%		6.0%
Bank		15.9%		4.0%		6.0%

Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets
Consolidated		10.7%		4.0%		5.0%
Bank		10.6%		4.0%		5.0%


As of June 30, 2014
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		18.0%		8.0%		10.0%
Bank		17.9%		8.0%		10.0%

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
Consolidated		16.8%		4.0%		6.0%
Bank		16.7%		4.0%		6.0%

Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets
Consolidated		10.7%		4.0%		5.0%
Bank		10.6%		4.0%		5.0%

The new common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset measurement (CET1) as a result of the Basel III capital reforms became effective for the Corporation as of January 1, 2015. This measurement has been added to the above table for June 30, 2015. For the Corporation, CET1 is the same as the Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets as currently the Corporation has none of the CET1 adjustments to Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets.

Dividends play a vital role in the management of capital levels of the Corporation. Management seeks a balance between maintaining a sufficient cushion of excess capital above regulatory limits versus the payment of dividends to the shareholders as a direct return of their investment. Due to a constant stream of stable earnings, the payment of a dividend is needed to maintain capital at acceptable levels in order to provide an adequate return of equity to the shareholders.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The Corporation’s dividends per share for the six months ended June 30, 2015, were $0.54, compared to $0.53 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. Dividends are paid from current earnings and available retained earnings. The Corporation’s current capital plan calls for management to maintain tier 1 capital to average assets between 10.0% and 12.0%. The Corporation’s current tier 1 capital ratio is 10.8%. As a secondary measurement, the capital plan also targets a long term dividend payout ratio in the range of 35% to 40%. This ratio will vary according to income, but over the long term, the Corporation’s goal is to maintain and target a payout ratio within this range. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the payout ratio was higher than the Capital plan range at 50.5% but has not had a material impact on the Corporation’s level of capital. The higher dividend payout ratio in the first six months of 2015 is primarily due to weaker earnings. This ratio should decrease if earnings increase throughout the remainder of 2015. Management’s goal is to maintain all regulatory capital ratios at current levels. Future dividend payout ratios are dependent on the future level of earnings and other factors that impact the level of capital.

The amount of unrealized gain or loss on the securities portfolio is reflected, net of tax, as an adjustment to capital, as required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This is recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in the capital section of the consolidated balance sheet. An unrealized gain increases capital, while an unrealized loss reduces capital. This requirement takes the position that, if the Corporation liquidated the securities portfolio at the end of each period, the current unrealized gain or loss on the securities portfolio would directly impact the Corporation’s capital. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation showed an unrealized loss, net of tax, of $481,000, compared to an unrealized gain of $1,002,000 at December 31, 2014, and an unrealized loss of $189,000 as of June 30, 2014. These unrealized gains and losses, net of tax are excluded from capital when calculating the tier 1 capital to average assets numbers above. The amount of unrealized gain or loss on the securities portfolio, shown net of tax, as an adjustment to capital, does not include any actual impairment taken on securities, which is shown as a reduction to income on the Corporation’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The changes in unrealized gains and losses are due to normal changes in market valuations of the Corporation’s securities as a result of interest rate movements.

Regulatory Capital Changes

In July 2013, the federal banking agencies issued final rules to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The phase-in period for community banking organizations began January 1, 2015, while larger institutions (generally those with assets of $250 billion or more) began compliance on January 1, 2014. The final rules call for the following capital requirements:

A minimum ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%.

A minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6%.

A minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%.

A minimum leverage ratio of 4%.

In addition, the final rules established a common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets applicable to all banking organizations. If a banking organization fails to hold capital above the minimum capital ratios and the capital conservation buffer, it will be subject to certain restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. The phase-in period for the capital conservation and countercyclical capital buffers for all banking organizations will begin on January 1, 2016.

Under the initially proposed rules, accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) would have been included in a banking organization’s common equity tier 1 capital. The final rules allow community banks to make a one-time election not to include these additional components of AOCI in regulatory capital and instead use the existing treatment under the general risk-based capital rules that excludes most AOCI components from regulatory capital. The opt-out election was made by the Corporation with the filing of the first quarter Call Report as of March 31, 2015.

The final rules permanently grandfather non-qualifying capital instruments (such as trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock) issued before May 19, 2010 for inclusion in the tier 1 capital of banking organizations with total consolidated assets less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009, and banking organizations that were mutual holding companies as of May 19, 2010. The Corporation does not have trust preferred securities or cumulative perpetual preferred stock with no plans to add these to the capital structure.

The proposed rules would have modified the risk-weight framework applicable to residential mortgage exposures to require banking organizations to divide residential mortgage exposures into two categories in order to determine the applicable risk weight. In response to commenter concerns about the burden of calculating the risk weights and the potential negative effect on credit availability, the final rules do not adopt the proposed risk weights but retain the current risk weights for mortgage exposures under the general risk-based capital rules.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, the new rules replace the ratings-based approach to securitization exposures, which is based on external credit ratings, with the simplified supervisory formula approach in order to determine the appropriate risk weights for these exposures. Alternatively, banking organizations may use the existing gross-up approach to assign securitization exposures to a risk weight category or choose to assign such exposures a 1,250 percent risk weight. The Corporation does not securitize assets and has no plans to do so.

Under the new rules, mortgage servicing assets (MSAs) and certain deferred tax assets (DTAs) are subject to stricter limitations than those applicable under the current general risk-based capital rule. The new rules also increase the risk weights for past-due loans, certain commercial real estate loans, and some equity exposures, and makes selected other changes in risk weights and credit conversion factors.

Management has evaluated the impact of the above rules on levels of the Corporation’s capital. The final rulings were highly favorable in terms of the items that would have a more significant impact to the Corporation and community banks in general. Specifically, the AOCI final ruling, which would have had the greatest impact, now provides the Corporation with an opt-out provision. The final ruling on the risk weightings of mortgages was favorable and did not have a material negative impact. The rulings as to trust preferred securities, preferred stock, and securitization of assets are not applicable to the Corporation, and presently the revised treatment of MSAs is not material to capital. The remaining changes to risk weightings on several items mentioned above such as past-due loans and certain commercial real estate loans do not have a material impact to capital presently, but could change as these levels change.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, the Corporation typically has off-balance sheet arrangements related to loan funding commitments. These arrangements may impact the Corporation’s financial condition and liquidity if they were to be exercised within a short period of time. As discussed in the following liquidity section, the Corporation has in place sufficient liquidity alternatives to meet these obligations. The following table presents information on the commitments by the Corporation as of June 30, 2015.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

	June 30,
	2015
	$
Commitments to extend credit:
Revolving home equity		38,340
Construction loans		18,526
Real estate loans		36,940
Business loans		90,506
Consumer loans		1,276
Other		3,460
Standby letters of credit		10,933

Total		199,981

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act

In April 2012, President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”) into law. The JOBS Act is aimed at facilitating capital raising by smaller companies and banks and bank holding companies by implementing the following changes:

raising the threshold requiring registration under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") for banks and bank holding companies from 500 to 2,000 holders of record;

raising the threshold for triggering deregistration under the Exchange Act for banks and bank holding companies from 300 to 1,200 holders of record;

raising the limit for Regulation A offerings from $5 million to $50 million per year and exempting some Regulation A offerings from state blue sky laws;

permitting advertising and general solicitation in Rule 506 and Rule 144A offerings;

allowing private companies to use "crowdfunding" to raise up to $1 million in any 12-month period, subject to certain conditions; and

creating a new category of issuer, called an "Emerging Growth Company," for companies with less than $1 billion in annual gross revenue, which will benefit from certain changes that reduce the cost and burden of carrying out an equity IPO and complying with public company reporting obligations for up to five years.

While the JOBS Act does not have any current application to the Corporation, management will continue to monitor the implementation rules for potential effects which might benefit the Corporation.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) was signed into law. Dodd-Frank is intended to affect a fundamental restructuring of federal banking regulation. Among other things, Dodd-Frank creates a new Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify systemic risks in the financial system and gives federal regulators new authority to take control of and liquidate financial firms. Dodd-Frank additionally creates a new independent federal regulator to administer federal consumer protection laws. Dodd-Frank is expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s business operations as its provisions take effect. It is difficult to predict at this time what specific cumulative impact Dodd-Frank and the yet-to-be-written implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks. However, it is expected that, at a minimum, they will increase the Corporation’s operating and compliance costs and could increase interest expense. Among the provisions that are likely to affect the Corporation are the following:

Holding Company Capital Requirements

Dodd-Frank requires the Federal Reserve to apply consolidated capital requirements to bank holding companies that are no less stringent than those currently applied to depository institutions. Under these standards, trust preferred securities will be excluded from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010, by a bank holding company with less than $15 billion in assets. Dodd-Frank additionally requires that bank regulators issue countercyclical capital requirements so that the required amount of capital increases in times of economic expansion and decreases in times of economic contraction, are consistent with safety and soundness.

Deposit Insurance

Dodd-Frank permanently increased the maximum deposit insurance amount for banks, savings institutions, and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor. Additionally, on February 7, 2011, the Board of Directors of the FDIC approved a final rule based on the Dodd-Frank Act that revises the assessment base from one based on domestic deposits to one based on assets. This change, which was effective in April 2011, saved the Corporation a significant amount of FDIC insurance premiums from the significantly higher FDIC insurance premiums placed into effect after the financial crisis.

Corporate Governance

Dodd-Frank requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation at least every three years, a non-binding vote regarding the frequency of the vote on executive compensation at least every six years, and a non-binding vote on “golden parachute” payments in connection with approvals of mergers and acquisitions unless previously voted on by shareholders. The SEC has finalized the rules implementing these requirements which took effect on January 21, 2011. The Corporation was exempt from these requirements until January 21, 2013, due to its status as a smaller reporting company. Additionally, Dodd-Frank directs the federal banking regulators to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to executives of depository institutions and their holding companies with assets in excess of $1.0 billion, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded. Dodd-Frank also gives the SEC authority to prohibit broker discretionary voting on elections of directors and executive compensation matters.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Limits on Interchange Fees

Dodd-Frank amended the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to, among other things, give the Federal Reserve the authority to establish rules regarding interchange fees charged for electronic debit transactions by payment card issuers having assets over $10 billion and to enforce a new statutory requirement that such fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Dodd-Frank created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which is granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Act, the Consumer Financial Privacy Provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and certain other statutes. The CFPB has examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with $10 billion or more in assets. Smaller institutions will be subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but will continue to be examined and supervised by federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes. The CFPB will have authority to prevent unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices in connection with the offering of consumer financial products. Dodd-Frank authorizes the CFPB to establish certain minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages including a determination of the borrower’s ability to repay. In addition, Dodd-Frank will allow borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure if they receive any loan other than a “qualified mortgage” as defined by the CFPB. Dodd-Frank permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and standards that are more stringent than those adopted at the federal level and, in certain circumstances, permits state attorneys general to enforce compliance with both the state and federal laws and regulations.

Prohibition Against Charter Conversions of Troubled Institutions

Dodd-Frank prohibits a depository institution from converting from a state to federal charter or vice versa while it is the subject of a cease and desist order or other formal enforcement action or a memorandum of understanding with respect to a significant supervisory matter unless the appropriate federal banking agency gives notice of the conversion to the federal or state authority that issued the enforcement action and that agency does not object within 30 days. The notice must include a plan to address the significant supervisory matter. The converting institution must also file a copy of the conversion application with its current federal regulator which must notify the resulting federal regulator of any ongoing supervisory or investigative proceedings that are likely to result in an enforcement action and provide access to all supervisory and investigative information relating thereto.

Interstate Branching

Dodd-Frank authorizes national and state banks to establish branches in other states to the same extent as a bank chartered by that state would be permitted. Previously, banks could only establish branches in other states if the host state expressly permitted out-of-state banks to establish branches in that state. Accordingly, banks will be able to enter new markets more freely.

Limits on Interstate Acquisitions and Mergers

Dodd-Frank precludes a bank holding company from engaging in an interstate acquisition – the acquisition of a bank outside its home state – unless the bank holding company is both well capitalized and well managed. Furthermore, a bank may not engage in an interstate merger with another bank headquartered in another state unless the surviving institution will be well capitalized and well managed. The previous standard in both cases was adequately capitalized and adequately managed.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP
Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As a financial institution, the Corporation is subject to three primary risks:

Credit risk

Liquidity risk

Interest rate risk

The Board of Directors has established an Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) to measure, monitor, and manage these primary market risks. The Asset Liability Policy has instituted guidelines for all of these primary risks, as well as other financial performance measurements with target ranges. The Asset Liability goals and guidelines are consistent with the Strategic Plan goals related to financial performance.

Credit Risk

For discussion on credit risk refer to the sections in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis, on securities, non-performing assets, and allowance for loan losses.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity refers to having an adequate supply of cash available to meet business needs. Financial institutions must ensure that there is adequate liquidity to meet a variety of funding needs, at a minimal cost. Minimal cost is an important component of liquidity. If a financial institution is required to take significant action to obtain funding, and is forced to utilize an expensive source, it has not properly planned for its liquidity needs. Funding new loans and covering deposit withdrawals are the primary liquidity needs of the Corporation. The Corporation uses a variety of funding sources to meet liquidity needs, such as:

Deposits

Loan repayments

Maturities and sales of securities

Borrowings from correspondent and member banks

Repurchase agreements

Brokered deposits

Current earnings

As noted in the discussion on deposits, customers have historically provided the Corporation with a reliable and steadily increasing source of funds liquidity. The Corporation also has in place relationships with other banking institutions for the purpose of buying and selling Federal funds. The lines of credit with these institutions provide immediate sources of additional liquidity. The Corporation currently has unsecured lines of credit totaling $32 million. This does not include amounts available from member banks such as the Federal Reserve Discount Window or the FHLB of Pittsburgh.

Management uses a cumulative maturity gap analysis to measure the amount of assets maturing within various periods versus liabilities maturing in those same periods. A gap ratio of 100% represents an equal amount of assets and liabilities maturing in the same stated period. Management monitors six-month, one-year, three-year, and five-year cumulative gaps to assist in determining liquidity risk. The Corporation was within internal gap guidelines for all ratios except the five-year gap as of June 30, 2015. The five-year ratio was just slightly higher than the policy range at 118.2%, versus an upper policy guideline of 115%. In a rising rate environment it is helpful to have higher gap ratios to allow for asset reinvestment at higher rates. The other gap ratios as of June 30, 2015, had not changed significantly since December 31, 2014, with a one-year gap of 83% and a three-year gap of 110%, compared to 93% and 98%, respectively, as of December 31, 2014.

Management has been maintaining higher levels of cash and cash equivalents to assist in offsetting the Corporation’s relatively long securities portfolio, which has helped to maintain the gap ratios at their current levels. The strategy of maintaining higher cash levels to improve gap ratios and act as an immediate hedge against liquidity risk and interest rate risk is expected to continue until the securities portfolio is materially shorter in duration.

It is possible that short term rates will increase in the latter part of 2015, so management’s current position is to increase maturity gap percentages slightly in preparation for higher rates and still maintain them within guidelines. Higher gap ratios will help the Corporation when rates do rise, and it is important to take action to increase gap ratios in future quarters. The risk in maintaining high gap percentages is that, should interest rates not rise, management will have a higher amount of maturing assets that will reprice at lower rates. This is referred to as repricing risk. Carrying high gap ratios in the current environment brings on an increased level of repricing risk, which negatively impacts the Corporation’s interest income and margin. The risk of liabilities repricing at higher interest rates is low in the present environment as over half of the Corporation’s deposits are core deposits with no repricing expected to occur in the near future. The remainder of the Corporation’s maturing liabilities made up of time deposits and borrowings are generally repricing to similar interest rates. Only the Corporation’s longest time deposits, with four and five-year terms, are still repricing to lower interest rates. As of June 30, 2015, there remains one $2.5 million FHLB long-term borrowing and one $5.0 million repurchase agreement that will reprice to significantly lower interest rates in the second half of 2015. Meanwhile, the mid-term time deposits with eighteen months to three-year terms, are already repricing to higher interest rates. Therefore, higher levels of liabilities repricing generally would have a neutral impact to the Corporation currently based on present pricing. This is projected to change to a negative impact in the near future. As a Federal Reserve rate increase becomes more imminent, all deposit rates will likely need to be increased in order to retain balances and react to competition. This will act to increase the Corporation’s interest expense.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Given the limited desirable rates currently available to the deposit customer, management does not perceive significant risk that deposits maturing in the shorter time frames will leave the Corporation. It is likely that, should market interest rates rise materially in the remainder of 2015, customer behavior patterns would change and deposits would be more rate sensitive with a portion potentially leaving the Corporation. The Corporation has experienced a steady growth in both non-interest bearing and interest bearing funds during this historically low interest rate environment; however, deposit growth has slowed significantly during the first half of 2015 compared to prior years.

The performance of the equity markets also has a bearing on how much of the current deposits will remain at the Corporation. It is management’s observation that since the financial crisis, an element of the Corporation’s deposit customers has been reluctant to redeploy funds presently at banks back into the equity market. They have been negatively impacted by multiple declines in the equity markets. It remains to be seen whether further equity market improvements will materially change customer behavior.

Ideally, management would prefer to maintain slightly higher six-month and one-year gap ratios than the current levels in order to prepare for rates-up, while still maintaining a higher three-year gap ratio to be positioned to reinvest assets after interest rates have increased significantly over a period of time. For example, even if the FOMC were to begin increasing short-term interest rates in late 2015, it would likely be at least until 2016 before interest rates would likely near the highs of the next rate cycle. The Corporation’s high overnight cash position is to counter the relatively light initial cash ladder of the securities portfolio and will allow the Corporation to immediately invest in higher yielding instruments when interest rates rise. The risk of carrying large cash balances and positioning for higher interest rates too early may subject the Corporation to more repricing risk and lower net interest margin. Currently, the Corporation’s net interest margin is at lower levels than the prior year’s levels due to lower security yields resulting from higher amortization and lower loan yields resulting from competitive pricing in the current interest rate environment. Management’s future asset liability decisions will be dependent upon improvements in asset yield as well as the expected timing of short-term rate increases. Management expects that the gap ratios will remain within the established guidelines throughout the remainder of 2015.

It is important to stress that the gap ratios are a static measurement of the Corporation’s asset liability position. It is only one of many asset liability analysis tools management utilizes to measure, monitor, and manage both liquidity and interest rate risk. The deficiencies with the gap analysis are that it makes no provision for changes to the balance sheet out into the future and would not factor in changes that management would very likely make to mitigate future interest rate risk.

In addition to the cumulative maturity gap analysis discussed above, management utilizes a number of liquidity measurements that management believes has advantages over and gives better clarity to the Corporation’s present and projected liquidity that the static gap analysis offers.

The Corporation analyzes the following additional liquidity measurements in an effort to monitor and mitigate liquidity risk:

Core Deposit Ratio – Core deposits as a percentage of assets

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Funding Concentration Analysis – Alternative funding sources outside of core deposits as a percentage of assets

Short-term Funds Availability – Readily available short-term funds as a percentage of assets

Securities Portfolio Liquidity – Cash flows maturing in one year or less as a percentage of assets and securities

Readily Available Unencumbered Securities and Cash – Unencumbered securities as a percentage of the securities portfolio and as a percentage of total assets

Borrowing Limits – Internal borrowing limits in terms of both FHLB and total borrowings

Three, Six, and Twelve-month Projected Sources and Uses of Funds – Projection of future liquidity positions

These measurements are designed to prevent undue reliance on outside sources of funding and to ensure a steady stream of liquidity is available should events occur that would cause a sudden decrease in deposits or large increase in loans or both, which would in turn draw significantly from the Corporation’s available liquidity sources. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation was within guidelines for all of the above measurements except securities portfolio liquidity as a percentage of the investment portfolio and as a percentage of assets. The policy calls for the Corporation to maintain securities portfolio cash flows maturing in one year or less between 10% and 20% of the securities portfolio and between 5% and 10% of total assets. As of June 30, 2015, these cash flows represented 8.0% of the securities portfolio and 2.7% of total assets, which is under the lower guideline. However, when factoring in available overnight cash, the Corporation’s securities portfolio liquidity represented 16.3% of the securities portfolio and 5.5% of total assets. It is important for the Corporation to prepare for a rates-up environment and having more liquidity is advantageous as funds can be reinvested in higher yielding assets faster when sufficient liquidity exists. Management has been carrying an average of $25 million to $40 million of cash and cash equivalents on a daily basis throughout the first six months of 2015, and expects this will continue in the near future. All liquidity measurements are tracked and reported quarterly by management to both observe trends and ensure the measurements stay within desired ranges. Management is confident that a sufficient amount of internal and external liquidity exists to provide for significant unanticipated liquidity needs.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is measured using two analytical tools:

Changes in net interest income

Changes in net portfolio value

Financial modeling is used to forecast net interest income and earnings, as well as net portfolio value, also referred to as fair value. The modeling is generally conducted under seven different interest rate scenarios. The scenarios consist of a projection of net interest income if rates remain flat, increase 100, 200, 300, or 400 basis points, or decrease 50 or 100 basis points. Rates-down scenarios are unlikely at this point so management is more focused on the rates-up scenarios. The results obtained through the use of forecasting models are based on a variety of factors. Both the net interest income and fair value forecasts make use of the maturity and repricing schedules to determine the changes to the balance sheet over the course of time. Additionally, there are many assumptions that factor into the results. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following:

Projected forward interest rates

Slope of the U.S. Treasury curve

Spreads available on securities over the U.S. Treasury curve

Prepayment speeds on loans held and mortgage-backed securities

Anticipated calls on securities with call options

Deposit and loan balance fluctuations

Competitive pressures affecting loan and deposit rates

Economic conditions

Consumer reaction to interest rate changes

For the interest rate sensitivity analysis and net portfolio value analysis discussed below, results are based on a static balance sheet reflecting no projected growth from balances as of June 30, 2015. While it is unlikely that the balance sheet will not grow at all, management considers a static analysis of this sort to be the most conservative and most accurate means to evaluate fair value and future interest rate risk. The static balance sheet approach is used to reduce the number of variables in calculating the model’s accuracy in predicting future net interest income. It is appropriate to pull out various balance sheet growth scenarios which could be utilized to compensate for a declining margin. By testing the model using a base model assuming no growth, this variable is eliminated and management can focus on predicted net interest income based on the current existing balance sheet. Management does run additional scenarios with expected growth rates through the asset liability model to most accurately predict future financial performance. This is done separately and apart from the static balance sheet approach discussed above to test fair value and future interest rate risk.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

As a result of the many assumptions, this information should not be relied upon to predict future results. Additionally, both of the analyses discussed below do not consider any action that management could take to minimize or offset the negative effect of changes in interest rates. These tools are used to assist management in identifying possible areas of risk in order to address them before a greater risk is posed. Personnel perform an in-depth annual validation and a quarterly review of the settings and assumptions used in the model to ensure reliability of the forecast results. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2014, an independent third party performed a comprehensive validation on the model input, assumptions, and output and determined that the model was managed appropriately and generating acceptable results. Back testing of the model to actual results is performed quarterly to ensure the validity of the assumptions in the model. The internal and external validations as well as the back testing indicate that the model assumptions are reliable.

Changes in Net Interest Income

The change in net interest income measures the amount of net interest income fluctuation that would be experienced over one year, assuming interest rates change immediately and remain the same for one year. This is considered to be a short-term view of interest rate risk. The analysis of changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates is commonly referred to as interest rate sensitivity. The Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity analysis indicates were interest rates to go up immediately the Corporation would realize more net interest income. This is due to the ability of the Corporation to immediately achieve higher interest earnings on interest-earning assets while having the ability to limit the amount of increase in interest-bearing liabilities based on the timing of deposit rate changes. This results in an increase in net interest income in the up-rate scenarios, but a decline in net interest income in the down-rate scenarios.

The second quarter 2015 analysis projects net interest income expected in the seven rate scenarios over a one-year time horizon. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation was well within guidelines for the maximum amount of net interest income change in all rate scenarios. All up-rate scenarios show a positive impact to net interest income although significant improvements are not reflected until rates increase 300 or 400 basis points. The increase in net interest income in the up-rate scenarios is largely due to the increase in variable rate loans that has occurred during this historically low rate environment and the higher cash balances held on the Corporation’s balance sheet. On the liability side, when interest rates do increase, it is typical for management to react more slowly in increasing deposit rates. Loan rates will increase by the full amount of the market rate movement while deposit rates will only increase at a fraction of the market rate increase. Additionally, deposit rates may level off more when market rates increase by 300 or 400 basis points where variable loan rates will still increase by the same amount as the Prime rate. The increases in net interest income in the up-rate scenarios are slightly lower than the increases reflected at December 31, 2014, but importantly still show improved net interest income. It is unlikely that rates will go down, but in the event that they would go lower, the Corporation would have exposure to all maturing fixed-rate loans and securities, which would reprice lower while most of the Corporation’s interest-bearing deposits could not be repriced any lower. This would result in a decline in net interest income in any down-rate scenario. However, even in the highly unlikely down-rate scenarios, the Corporation’s exposure to declining net interest income is still within policy guidelines.

Management’s primary concern in this current rate environment is with the most likely scenario of higher interest rates; therefore, they are reviewed with more scrutiny. For the rates-up 100 basis point scenario, net interest income increased minimally by 0.5% compared to the rates unchanged scenario. This minimal increase reflects the fact that some loans are priced at floor rates of 4.00% currently and would not be able to immediately reprice by the full amount of the rate movement. However, in the remaining rates-up scenarios, the net interest income increases more substantially reflecting the full repriceabilty of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets. For the rates-up 200, 300, and 400 basis point scenarios, net interest income increased by 2.2%, 6.0%, and 10.5%, respectively, compared to the rates unchanged scenario. Management’s maximum permitted net interest income declines by policy are -5%, -10%, -15%, and -20% for the rates up 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis point scenarios, respectively.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

The positive impact of significantly higher rates is primarily due to the favorable impact of all of the Corporation’s variable rate loans repricing by the full amount of the Federal rate change, assisted by the Corporation’s relatively high interest earning cash balances and that component of the loans and securities portfolios that reprice in less than one year. This more than offsets the increase in interest expense caused by repricing deposits and borrowings, where they are only repricing by a fraction of the rate change. The more aggressive rates-up scenarios also benefit from known historical experience of deposit rate increases lagging and a slowing in the pace of the actual rate increase as interest rates continue to rise. This in essence allows management the ability to neutralize the impact of higher rates by controlling the large amount of liabilities that are repricing. Management does not expect the Corporation’s exposure to interest rate changes to increase or change significantly during the remainder of 2015.

The assumptions and analysis of interest rate risk are based on historical experience during varied economic cycles. Management believes these assumptions to be appropriate; however, actual results could vary significantly. Management uses this analysis to identify trends in interest rate sensitivity and determine if action is necessary to mitigate asset liability risk.

Changes in Net Portfolio Value

The change in net portfolio value is considered a tool to measure long-term interest rate risk. The analysis measures the exposure of the balance sheet to valuation changes due to changes in interest rates. The calculation of net portfolio value discounts future cash flows to the present value based on current market rates. The change in net portfolio value estimates the gain or loss that would occur on market sensitive instruments given an interest rate increase or decrease in the same seven scenarios mentioned above. As of June 30, 2015, the Corporation was within guidelines for all scenarios with the rates-up exposures showing slightly more volatility than the December 31, 2014 measurements. The increase in fair value exposure since December 31, 2014, can be primarily attributed to holding lower levels of cash that have no fair value risk as well as having fewer long-term liabilities. The value of non-interest bearing deposit accounts has always been highly favorable in a rising rate environment as these balances are more valuable to the Corporation, representing a decrease in liabilities as interest rates rise.

In the first quarter of 2013, the asset liability model settings were changed for the Corporation’s interest-bearing core deposit accounts to reflect their true value more accurately as rates rise based on assumptions regarding the proportionality of their rates changing in relation to the change in the Prime rate. More recently, management has built more deposit rate sensitivity into the model to reflect that interest rates will be coming off all-time lows and they have been artificially held low for a prolonged period of time. Management believes the interest bearing core deposit types will be more rate sensitive on average than these deposits were in the last rates-up cycle.

The results as of June 30, 2015, indicate that the Corporation’s net portfolio value would experience a slight valuation gain of 0.9% in the rates-up 100 basis point scenario, and losses of 2.4%, 7.5% and 14.3% in the rates-up 200, 300, and 400 basis point scenarios, respectively. Management’s maximum permitted declines in net portfolio value by policy are -7.5% for rates-up 100 basis points, graduating up to -30% for rates-up 400 basis points. A valuation loss indicates that the value of the Corporation’s assets is declining at a faster pace than the decrease in the value of the Corporation’s liabilities. The more significant valuation losses represented in the higher rates-up scenarios are indicative of the Corporation’s longer-term assets like residential mortgages and municipal securities showing significant declines in value as interest rates increase further. However, the value of the cash held by the Corporation and the non-interest bearing deposits helps to offset this negative exposure to a large degree. It is not anticipated that these exposures to valuation changes will change materially during the remainder of 2015. Additionally, based on past decay rate studies on the Corporation’s core deposits, management does not expect a material decline in core deposit accounts, including the non-interest bearing accounts, when short term interest rates do increase. The Corporation’s core deposits have been stable through a number of rate cycles.

The weakness with the net portfolio value analysis is that it assumes liquidation of the Corporation rather than as a going concern. For that reason, it is considered a secondary measurement of interest rate risk to “Changes in Net Interest Income” discussed above. However, the net portfolio value analysis is a more important tool to measure the impact of interest rate changes to capital. In the current regulatory climate, the focus is on ensuring adequate asset liability modeling is being done to project the impact of very large interest rate increases. The asset liability modeling currently in place measures the impact of such a rate change on the valuation of the Corporation’s loans, securities, deposits, and borrowings, and the resulting impact to capital. Management continues to analyze additional scenario testing to model “worst case” scenarios to adequately plan for the possible severe impact of such events.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and the operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2015, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2015, are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls.

There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

June 30, 2015

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Management is not aware of any litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation or its subsidiaries taken as a whole. There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of the Corporation. In addition, no material proceedings are pending, are known to be threatened, or contemplated against the Corporation by governmental authorities.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The Corporation continually monitors the risks related to the Corporation’s business, other events, the Corporation’s Common Stock, and the Corporation’s industry. Management has not identified any new risk factors since the December 31, 2014 Form 10-K filing.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Purchases

The following table details the Corporation’s purchase of its own common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securites

					Total Number of		Maximum Number
	Total Number		Average		Shares Purchased		of Shares that May
	of Shares		Price Paid		as Part of Publicly		Yet be Purchased
Period	Purchased		Per Share		Announced Plans *		Under the Plan *

April 2015		6,400	$	32.90		6,400		6,710
May 2015		—		—		—		6,710
June 2015		—		—		—		6,710

Total		6,400

*On August 13, 2008, the Board of Directors of ENB Financial Corp announced the approval of a plan to purchase, in open market and privately negotiated transactions, up to 140,000 shares of outstanding common stock. Shares repurchased are being held as treasury shares to be utilized in connection with the Corporation’s three stock purchase plans previously mentioned. The first purchase of common stock under this plan occurred on August 27, 2008.

On June 17, 2015, the Board of Directors of ENB Financial Corp announced the approval of the renewal of this plan to purchase, in open market and privately negotiated transactions, up to an additional 140,000 shares of its outstanding common stock. The quarterly repurchase noted above that was transacted in April 2015 was the last buyback under the old plan. All future purchases will be made under the plan approved in June 2015. Under the old plan, a total of 133,290 shares were repurchased at a total cost of $3,585,000 for an average cost per share of $26.89. Management may choose to repurchase additional shares during the remainder of 2015 under the new plan.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – Nothing to Report

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures – Not Applicable

Item 5. Other Information – Nothing to Report

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

Item 6. Exhibits:

Exhibits - The following exhibits are filed as part of this filing on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference hereto:

		Page
3 (i)	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended	*

3 (ii)	By-Laws of the Registrant, as amended	**

10.1	Form of Deferred Income Agreement.	***

10.2	2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan	****

10.3	2010 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan	*****

11	Statement re: computation of per share earnings	4
	(Included on page 4 herein)

31.1	Section 302 Chief Executive Officer Certification	78

31.2	Section 302 Principal Financial Officer Certification	79

32.1	Section 1350 Chief Executive Officer Certification	80

32.2	Section 1350 Principal Financial Officer Certification	81

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 28, 2012.

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 15, 2010.

***

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2008.

****

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on March 29, 2012.

*****

Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 4, 2010.

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ENB Financial Corp
	(Registrant)


Dated: August 13, 2015	By:	/s/ Aaron L. Groff, Jr.
		Aaron L. Groff, Jr.
		Chairman of the Board,
		Chief Executive Officer and President


Dated: August 13, 2015	By:	/s/ Scott E. Lied
		Scott E. Lied, CPA
		Treasurer
		Principal Financial Officer

Index

ENB FINANCIAL CORP

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description	Page number on Manually Signed Original
3(i)	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 28, 2012.)
3 (ii)	By-Laws of the Registrant, as amended. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 15, 2010.)
10.1	Form of Deferred Income Agreement. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 13, 2008.)
10.2	2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on March 29, 2012.)
10.3	2010 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 of the Corporation’s Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 4, 2010.)
11	Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share as found on page 4 of Form 10-Q, which is included herein.	Page 4
31.1	Section 302 Chief Executive Officer Certification (Required by Rule 13a-14(a)).	Page 78
31.2	Section 302 Principal Financial Officer Certification (Required by Rule 13a-14(a)).	Page 79
32.1	Section 1350 Chief Executive Officer Certification (Required by Rule 13a-14(b)).	Page 80
32.2	Section 1350 Principal Financial Officer Certification (Required by Rule 13a-14(b)).	Page 81