ENDONOVO THERAPEUTICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission File Number: 333-176954

ENDONOVO THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

6320 Canoga Avenue, 15th Floor, Woodland Hills, CA 91367

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(800) 489-4774

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [ X ] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

As of May 5, 2017, there were 233,764,338 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value issued and outstanding.

ENDONOVO THERAPEUTICS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-Q REPORT

March 31, 2017

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying summary of accounting polices and notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

(Unaudited)

See accompanying summary of accounting polices and notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying summary of accounting polices and notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Deficit

(Unaudited)

See accompanying summary of accounting polices and notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Organization and Nature of Business

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company” or “ETI”) is primarily focused in the business of biomedical research and development, particularly in regenerative medicine, which has included the development of its proprietary square wave form device. The Company has historically been involved with intellectual property licensing and commercialization.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management such interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. The results of operations for the period presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for future interim periods or for the full year.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of ETI and IPR as of March 14, 2012; Aviva as of April 2, 2013; and WeHealAnimals as of November 16, 2013. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Going Concern

These accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve month period following the date of these consolidated financial statements are issued. The Company has recurring net losses and working capital deficits. The Company has raised approximately $493,500 in debt and equity financing for the period January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017. The Company is raising additional capital through debt and equity securities in order to continue the funding of its operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company can raise enough funds or generate sufficient revenues to pay its obligations as they become due, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets or liabilities as a result of this uncertainty. To reduce the risk of not being able to continue as a going concern, management has implemented its business plan to materialize revenues from potential, future, license agreements, has initiated a private placement offering to raise capital through the sale of its common stock, and is seeking out profitable companies. In addition, management has a commitment from a current lender for a total of $2.7 million in the form of convertible notes. To date, the Company has received cash funding of $683,500 for $728,750 of convertible notes under this commitment. This commitment is subject to the Company not taking any variable financing from any other investor or lender. Although, uncertainty exists as to whether the Company will be able to generate enough cash from operations to fund the Company’s working capital needs or raise sufficient capital to meet the Company’s obligations as they become due, no adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets or liabilities as a result of this uncertainty.

Net Income (Loss) per Share

For the three month period ending March 31, 2017, the Company had 43,665,516 of weighted average common shares relating to the convertible debt, under the if-converted method and warrants exercisable into up to 22,174,687 common shares, however, these shares are not dilutive because the Company recorded losses during each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued FASB ASU2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. FASB ASU 2014-15 changes to the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. Substantial doubt is defined as an indication that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. If management has concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt, (ii) management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations, (iii) management’s plans that alleviated the initial substantial doubt or, if substantial doubt was not alleviated, management’s plans that are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, and (iv) if the latter in (iii) is disclosed, an explicit statement that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes became effective for the Company for the 2016 annual period. Management has evaluated the impact of the adoption of these changes and has determined there will be no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to adoption, this guidance will need to be applied by management at the end of each annual period and interim period therein to determine what, if any, impact there will be on the consolidated financial statements in a given reporting period.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-3, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This update changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt obligation to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. Amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements”. This ASU clarified guidance in ASC 2015-03 stating that the SEC staff would not object to a company presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement on the balance sheet as a deferred asset, regardless of whether there were any outstanding borrowings at period-end. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which required us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of 2016. This update was applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each period presented was adjusted to reflect the effects of applying the new guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The amendments in ASU 2015-17 change the requirements for the classification of deferred taxes on the balance sheet. Currently, GAAP requires an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this ASU require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has early adopted this pronouncement for the fiscal reporting period ended December 31, 2016, and has reclassified the presentation of deferred income taxes in the prior period to conform with the current year classification in the consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the Company having recognized a valuation reserve for the entire deferred tax liability balance at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there is no impact of the presentation of deferred income taxes in our financial statements.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The update intends to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information and addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The new standard affects all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the impact of the adoption of these changes will have on the consolidated financial statements.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in “Leases (Topic 840)” and generally requires all leases to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Property, Plant and Equipment

The following is a summary of equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $3,690 and $3,958, respectively. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred while improvements are capitalized. Upon the sale, retirement or disposal of fixed assets, the accounts are relieved of the cost and the related accumulated depreciation with any gain or loss recorded to the consolidated statements of operations.

Note 3 - Notes Payable and Long Term Loan

Notes Payable

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued three Convertible Notes (“Variable Notes”) totaling $308,750 with original terms of one year with interest rates equal to 10%, and a variable conversion rate with a discounts of 30% of the Company’s common stock based on the terms included in the Variable Notes. The Variable Notes contain a prepayment option, which enables the Company to prepay the note for a period of 0-180 days subsequent to issuance at a premium of 125%

The gross amount of all Variable Notes outstanding as of March 31, 2017 is $1,562,690. Of this amount outstanding, $66,000 of the Variable Debentures were past maturity.

As of March 31, 2017, other notes payable outstanding totaled $1,237,403, of which $1,007,403 are past maturity.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The maturity dates on the notes payable are as follows:

Long Term Loan

The Company has financed the purchase of an automobile. The maturity dates on the loan are as follows:

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 4 - Shareholders’ Deficit

Increase in Authorized Shares

On January 17, 2017, an increase in authorized capital stock from 250,000,000 shares to 500,000,000 shares became effective.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

At March 31, 2017, there are 50,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B”) which are authorized and convertible into a like amount of common shares. None of the Series B have been issued or are outstanding at March 31, 2017.

Common Stock

The Company has entered into consulting agreements with various consultants for service to be provided to the Company. The agreements stipulate a monthly fee and a certain number of shares that the consultant vests in over the term of the contract. The consultant is issued a prorated number of shares of common stock at the beginning of the contract, which the consultant earns over a three-month period. At the anniversary of each quarter, the consultant is issued a new allotment of common stock during the first 3 years of engagement. In accordance with ASC 505-50 – Equity-Based Payment to Non-Employees, the common stock shares issued to the consultant are valued upon their vesting, with interim estimates of value as appropriate during the vesting period. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued 747,336 shares of common stock with a value of $35,089 related to these consulting agreements.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued pursuant to a private placement offering 12,679,747 shares of common stock and the same number of warrants for cash of $200,000 and conversion of notes and accrued interest in the amount of $51,534. The Company also issued 74,884,707 shares of common stock for the conversion of notes and accrued interest in the amount of $679,597.

Also, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued 27,319 shares of common stock valued at $1,448 related to the extension of outstanding notes and lock-up agreements, 2,500,000 shares of common stock valued at $98,950 for partial repayment of a $175,000 accrued liability in connection with a variable note settlement agreement entered into in December 2016, and 500,000 shares of common stock valued at $29,500 for settlement of the principal and interest outstanding on a $25,000 note payable.

Series AA Preferred Shares

On February 22, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles of Incorporation”), in the form of a Certificate of Designation that authorized the issuance of up to one million (1,000,000) shares of a new series of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, designated “Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock,” for which the board of directors established the rights, preferences and limitations thereof.

Each holder of outstanding shares of Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock shall be entitled to one hundred thousand (100,000) votes for each share of Series AA Super Voting Preferred Stock held on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at each meeting of stockholders of the Company. As of March 31, 2017, there were 1,000 shares of Series AA Preferred stock outstanding.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Warrants

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, in conjunction with the sale of common stock and issuance of notes, the Company issued five-year common stock purchase warrants to acquire up to 12,679,747shares of common stock. These warrants have exercise prices ranging from $0.0165 to $0.0855 per share. The balance of all warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2017 is as follows:

Note 5 – Related Party Transactions

One officer and executive of the Company has entered into note payable agreements with the Company. The balance of notes payable from related parties at March 31, 2017 is $170,000.

Two executive officers and the operations manager of the Company have agreed to defer their compensation until cash flow improves. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance of their deferred compensation is approximately $1,857,998 and $1,861,327, respectively.

From time-to-time officers and the operations manager of the Company advance monies to the Company to cover costs. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, officers advanced $12,650 of funds to the Company of which $11,500 were repaid during the period. The balance of short-term advances due to two officers and executives of the Company at March 31, 2017 is $6,973.

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements

The Company has issued Variable Debentures which contained variable conversion rates based on unknown future prices of the Company’s common stock. This results in a conversion feature. The Company measures the conversion feature using the Black-Scholes option valuation model using the following assumptions:

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The time period over which the Company will be required to evaluate the fair value of the conversion feature is nine to twenty-four months or conversion.

The assumptions used in determining fair value represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change, including changes in the market value of the Company’s common stock, managements’ assessment or significant fluctuations in the volatility of the trading market for the Company’s common stock, the Company’s fair value estimates could be materially different in the future.

The Company computes the fair value of the derivative liability at each reporting period and the change in the fair value is recorded as non-cash expense or non-cash income. The key component in the value of the derivative liability is the Company’s stock price, which is subject to significant fluctuation and is not under its control. The resulting effect on net loss is therefore subject to significant fluctuation and will continue to be so until the Company’s Variable Debentures, which the convertible feature is associated with, are converted into common stock or paid in full with cash. Assuming all other fair value inputs remain constant, the Company will record non-cash expense when its stock price increases and non-cash income when its stock price decreases.

The following table presents changes in the liabiliti s with significant unobservable inputs (level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2017:

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Accounting guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities using a hierarchy system, and defines required disclosures. It clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts business.

The Company’s balance sheet contains derivative and warrant liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value is as follows:

Level 1: uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: uses observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: uses unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The fair value of the Company’s recorded derivative liability is determined based on unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data, which require a Level 3 classification. A Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model was used to determine the fair value. The Company records derivative liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operation.

The following table presents balances in the liabilities with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at March 31, 2017:

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

The Company may become involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business.

Note 8 – Subsequent Events

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, an aggregate of 250,000 shares of restricted common stock and options to purchase 19,250,000 at $0.054 per share for 10 years from the date of issuance with selling restrictions where the holder agrees not to sell more than 5,000 shares or 2% of the total daily volume of the Company’s common stock in any one day, whichever is greater were issued for services. The options shall contain cashless exercise rights.

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company issued 3,565,895 shares of its restricted common stock and 3,565,895 warrants pursuant to a Private Placement Memorandum and private offerings for $166,500.

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company received $390,000 of funding in connection with $420,000 of convertible notes issued.

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, an aggregate of 3,130,082 shares of restricted common stock were issued pursuant to Note Conversions of $47,227.

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, an aggregate of 76,799 shares of restricted common stock were issued pursuant to leak out agreements.

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, an aggregate of 1,065,816 shares of restricted common stock were issued pursuant to a settlement agreement.

As a result of these issuances the total number of shares outstanding is 233,764,338.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

The information contained in Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” and variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and projections about future events, are not guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below), and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Overview

Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company” or “ETI”) operates in two business segments: (1) intellectual property licensing and commercialization; and (2) biomedical research and development which has included development of its proprietary square wave form device.

Our present primary focus is the development, patenting and regulatory approval of our biomedical proprietary technology.

Going Concern

Our independent registered auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that states that our ongoing losses and lack of resources causes substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP). In doing so, we have to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. In some cases, we could reasonably have used different accounting policies and estimates. In some cases, changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from our estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our financial condition or results of operations will be affected. We base our estimates on past experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as critical accounting policies and estimates, which we discuss further below.

Use of estimates

In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and related interim statements of operations, cash flows, and shareholders’ deficits include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. The significant estimates were made for the fair value of common stock issued for services, with notes payable arrangements in connection with note extension agreements, and as repayment for outstanding debts, in estimating the useful life used for depreciation and amortization of our long-lived assets, in the valuation of the derivative liability, and the valuation of deferred income tax assets. Actual results and outcomes may differ from management’s estimates and assumptions.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued FASB ASU2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. FASB ASU 2014-15 changes to the disclosure of uncertainties about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes require an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. Substantial doubt is defined as an indication that it is probable that an entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. If management has concluded that substantial doubt exists, then the following disclosures should be made in the financial statements: (i) principal conditions or events that raised the substantial doubt, (ii) management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations, (iii) management’s plans that alleviated the initial substantial doubt or, if substantial doubt was not alleviated, management’s plans that are intended to at least mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt, and (iv) if the latter in (iii) is disclosed, an explicit statement that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. These changes became effective for the Company for the 2016 annual period. Management has evaluated the impact of the adoption of these changes and has determined there will be no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to adoption, this guidance will need to be applied by management at the end of each annual period and interim period therein to determine what, if any, impact there will be on the consolidated financial statements in a given reporting period.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-3, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This update changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt obligation to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. Amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, “Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements”. This ASU clarified guidance in ASC 2015-03 stating that the SEC staff would not object to a company presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement on the balance sheet as a deferred asset, regardless of whether there were any outstanding borrowings at period-end. This update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, which required us to adopt these provisions in the first quarter of 2016. This update was applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each period presented was adjusted to reflect the effects of applying the new guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The amendments in ASU 2015-17 change the requirements for the classification of deferred taxes on the balance sheet. Currently, GAAP requires an entity to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts in a classified statement of financial position. To simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes, the amendments in this ASU require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has early adopted this pronouncement for the fiscal reporting period ended December 31, 2016, and has reclassified the presentation of deferred income taxes in the prior period to conform with the current year classification in the consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the Company having recognized a valuation reserve for the entire deferred tax liability balance at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there is no impact of the presentation of deferred income taxes in our financial statements.

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The update intends to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information and addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The new standard affects all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the impact of the adoption of these changes will have on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in “Leases (Topic 840)” and generally requires all leases to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach.The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Three Months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were approximately $557,512 compared to $1,402,120 for the corresponding period of the previous year. The operating expenses were comprised primarily from consulting and professional fees for the development of our intellectual property and expenses related to being a public company. A significant portion of these fees were paid for with the issuance of restricted shares of common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, 747,336 shares of common stock were issued for consulting services valued at $35,088 as compared to 1,051,504 shares of common stock being issued for consulting services valued at $495,806, during the corresponding period of the previous year.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was expense of $7,207,464 compared to income of $498,657 for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. This change was due primarily to a change in valuation of our derivative liabilities and net of interest expense resulting from the amortization of the discounts on notes payable. In addition, we incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of $92,633 for debt conversions and settlements during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to income of $133,038 during the quarter ended March 31, 2016. We anticipate continued large fluctuations in other income (expense) as a result of quarterly re-evaluation of these derivative liabilities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception and through March 31, 2017, the Company has raised approximately $7 million in equity and debt transactions. These funds have been used to commence the operations of the Company to acquire and begin the development of its intellectual property portfolio. These activities include attending trade shows and corporate development. Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the twelve month period following the date these condensed consolidated financial statements are issued. The Company has incurred substantial losses since inception. Its current liabilities exceed its current assets and available cash is not sufficient to fund expected future operations. The Company is raising additional capital through debt and equity securities in order to continue the funding of its operations. However, there is no assurance that the Company can raise enough funds or generate sufficient revenues to pay its obligations as they become due, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To reduce the risk of not being able to continue as a going concern, management has implemented its business plan to materialize revenues from potential, future, license agreements, has initiated a private placement offering to raise capital through the sale of its common stock and is seeking out profitable companies. In addition, management has a commitment from a current lender for a total commitment of $2.7 million in the form of convertible notes. To date, the Company has received cash funding of $683,500 for $728,750 of convertible notes under this commitment. This commitment is subject to the Company not taking any variable financing from any other investor or lender. Although, uncertainty exists as to whether the Company will be able to generate enough cash from operations to fund the Company’s working capital needs or raise sufficient capital to meet the Company’s obligations as they become due, no adjustments have been made to the carrying value of assets or liabilities as a result of this uncertainty. Our cash on hand at March 31, 2017 was approximately $112,927. This will be insufficient to fund operations if additional capital is not raised. The Company raised an aggregate of approximately $493,500 through the sale of equity and debt securities during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

The Company is not aware of any recently issued accounting pronouncements that when adopted will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or result of its operation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are a Smaller Reporting Company and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure of controls and procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

As required by the SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management has identified the following two material weaknesses which have caused management to conclude that as of March 31, 2017 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, several lenders have commenced litigation against us, which is in the early stages. We anticipate that these matters will be settled, however, if a settlement cannot be reached, we will vigorously defend these matters and we do not believe that there will be any material adverse effect as a result thereof, but there is always uncertainty in any litigation and a result cannot be guaranteed.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

We are a Smaller Reporting Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The above issuances of securities during the three months ended March 31, 2017 were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2), and/or Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. These securities qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act since the issuance securities by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of securities offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of securities to a high number of investors. In addition, these stockholders had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such securities are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these securities would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.