ENERGY FOCUS, INC/DE - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
Form
10-Q
(Mark
one)
ý
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from_________to ___________
Commission
file number 0-24230
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
|
94-3021850
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
32000
Aurora Rd., Solon, OH
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
||
44139
(Zip
Code)
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code): (440)
715-1300
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes ý
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
See definition of accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
One)
Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer ý
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No
ý
The
number of outstanding shares of the registrants’ Common Stock, $0.0001 par
value, as of September 30, 2006
was
11,378,103.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Part
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||||
Item
|
1
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|||
a.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and
December
31, 2005
|
3
|
|||
b.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and
Nine Months
Ended
|
||||
September
30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
4
|
||||
c.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations for the Three
Months
and Nine
|
||||
Months
Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
5
|
||||
d.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September
30, 2006
|
||||
and
2005 (unaudited)
|
6
|
||||
e.
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7
|
|||
Item
|
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
14
|
||
Item
|
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
18
|
||
Item
|
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
18
|
||
Part
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||||
Item
|
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
||
Item
|
1
|
A
|
Risk
Factors
|
20
|
|
Item
|
6
|
Exhibits
|
21
|
||
Signatures
|
22
|
||||
Exhibit
Index
|
23
|
Item 1. Financial Statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts
in thousands)
|
September
30, 2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
|||||
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
3,319
|
$
|
5,554
|
|||
Short-term
investments
|
14,597
|
18,024
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable trade, net
|
5,338
|
6,287
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
7,880
|
7,852
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other current assets
|
635
|
879
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
31,769
|
38,596
|
|||||
Fixed
assets, net
|
5,861
|
3,422
|
|||||
Goodwill,
net
|
4,206
|
4,135
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
---
|
56
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
41,836
|
$
|
46,209
|
|||
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
2,952
|
$
|
2,623
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,900
|
3,924
|
|||||
Short-term
bank borrowings
|
1,897
|
389
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
6,749
|
6,936
|
|||||
Long-term
bank borrowings
|
2,130
|
1,089
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
8,879
|
8,025
|
|||||
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|||||||
Common
stock
|
1
|
1
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
53,399
|
52,452
|
|||||
Unearned
stock-based compensation
|
---
|
(397
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
337
|
41
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(20,780
|
)
|
(13,913
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
32,957
|
38,184
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
41,836
|
$
|
46,209
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three
months ended
September 30, |
Nine
months ended
September 30, |
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
6,808
|
$
|
7,638
|
$
|
19,845
|
$
|
22,102
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
4,772
|
4,680
|
13,879
|
13,679
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
2,036
|
2,958
|
5,966
|
8,423
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
630
|
639
|
1,521
|
1,516
|
|||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
2,280
|
2,611
|
7,132
|
7,319
|
|||||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,303
|
766
|
3,918
|
2,324
|
|||||||||
Restructure
Expense
|
98
|
904
|
734
|
1,102
|
|||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
4,311
|
4,920
|
13,305
|
12,261
|
|||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(2,275
|
)
|
(1,962
|
)
|
(7,339
|
)
|
(3,838
|
)
|
|||||
Other
income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||
Other
income/(expense)
|
6
|
(11
|
)
|
19
|
10
|
||||||||
Interest
income/ (expense)
|
177
|
(11
|
)
|
351
|
4
|
||||||||
Profit
(loss) before income taxes
|
(2,092
|
)
|
(1,984
|
)
|
(6,969
|
)
|
(3,824
|
)
|
|||||
Benefit
from (provision for) income taxes
|
(33
|
)
|
(90
|
)
|
103
|
(63
|
)
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(2,125
|
)
|
$
|
(2,074
|
)
|
$
|
(6,866
|
)
|
$
|
(3,887
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted
|
$
|
(.19
|
)
|
$
|
(.25
|
)
|
$
|
(.60
|
)
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
|
Shares
used in computing net loss per share - basic and diluted
|
11,371
|
8,169
|
11,362
|
7,782
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(amounts
in thousands)
(unaudited)
Three
months Ended
September 30, |
Nine
months Ended
September 30, |
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(2,125
|
)
|
$
|
(2,074
|
)
|
$
|
(6,866
|
)
|
$
|
(3,887
|
)
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
41
|
(75
|
)
|
217
|
(401
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
unrealized gain on securities
|
(67
|
)
|
--
|
79
|
--
|
||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$
|
(2,151
|
)
|
$
|
(2,149
|
)
|
$
|
(6,570
|
)
|
$
|
(4,288
|
)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts
in thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended September
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(6,866
|
)
|
$
|
(3,887
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
782
|
887
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
752
|
334
|
|||||
Unrealized
gain from marketable securities
|
79
|
-----
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts receivable
|
175
|
-----
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
894
|
2,260
|
|||||
Inventories
|
109
|
100
|
|||||
Prepaid
and other current assets
|
248
|
(542
|
)
|
||||
Other
assets
|
56
|
35
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
201
|
(112
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
(2,066
|
)
|
746
|
||||
Total
adjustments
|
1,230
|
3,708
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(5,636
|
)
|
(179
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of short-term investments
|
(91,506
|
)
|
------
|
||||
Sale
of short-term investments
|
94,933
|
------
|
|||||
Acquisition
of fixed assets
|
(3,222
|
)
|
(532
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
205
|
(532
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Cash
proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
565
|
1,530
|
|||||
Proceeds
from short-term bank borrowings
|
1,222
|
-----
|
|||||
Proceeds
from long-term bank borrowings
|
1,653
|
-----
|
|||||
Payments
of short and long-term bank borrowings
|
(325
|
)
|
-----
|
||||
Collection
of loan made to shareholder
|
62
|
-----
|
|||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
----
|
106
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
3,177
|
1,636
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
19
|
(168
|
)
|
||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,235
|
)
|
757
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
5,554
|
3,609
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
3,319
|
$
|
4,366
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
September
30, 2006
(Unaudited)
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Although
unaudited, the interim financial statements in this report reflect all
adjustments, consisting only of all normal recurring adjustments, which are,
in
the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods covered and of
the
financial condition of Fiberstars, Inc. (the “Company”) at the interim balance
sheet date. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are
not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire year.
Year-end
Balance Sheet
The
year-end balance sheet information was derived from audited financial statements
but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting
principles. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2005, contained in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Short-term
Investments
The
Company’s short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale, which are
stated at estimated fair value. The Company has determined its short-term
investments are available to support current operations and, accordingly, has
classified such short-term investments as current assets without regard for
contractual maturities. These short-term investments are invested through a
major financial institution. The unrealized gains or losses on these short-term
investments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate
component of shareholder’s equity until realized.
Short-term
investments at September 30, 2006 were as follows
(in
thousands):
|
Cost
|
Net
unrealized gain |
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Money
Market Fund
|
$
|
128
|
$
|
--
|
$
|
128
|
||||
Agencies
|
3,599
|
65
|
3,664
|
|||||||
Commercial
Paper
|
8,725
|
25
|
8,750
|
|||||||
Taxable
Floating Rate Notes
|
1,450
|
--
|
1,450
|
|||||||
Municipal
Bonds
|
600
|
5
|
605
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
14,502
|
$
|
95
|
$
|
14,597
|
The
short-term investments maturing over the next year total $10,741,000. The
remaining short-term investments have scheduled maturity dates from October
2007
through December 2036.
The
change in net unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale in
the
amount of $(67,000) has been charged to other comprehensive income for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006. The cost of securities sold is based on the
specific identification method.
Proceeds
from the sale of available securities during 2006 were approximately
$95,000,000. Gross gains of $408,000 were realized on the sales of available
for
sale securities during 2006. These gains on interest bearing securities are
included as part of the Interest Income/(expense) in the Statement of
Operations.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
Company’s international subsidiaries use their local currency as their
functional currency. For those subsidiaries, assets and liabilities are
translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and income
and
expense accounts at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting
translation adjustments are recorded to a separate component of shareholders’
equity.
Earnings
per Share
Basic
earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing income available to
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the
period. Diluted EPS is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential
common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common
shares consist of incremental shares upon exercise of stock options and
warrants.
A
reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS is
provided as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three
months ended
September 30, |
Nine
months ended
September 30, |
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Numerator
- net loss
|
$
|
(2,125
|
)
|
$
|
(2,074
|
)
|
$
|
(6,866
|
)
|
$
|
(3,887
|
)
|
|
Denominator
- Basic and Diluted EPS
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
11,371
|
8,169
|
11,362
|
7,782
|
|||||||||
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share
|
$
|
(.19
|
)
|
$
|
(.25
|
)
|
$
|
(.60
|
)
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
At
September 30, 2006, options and warrants to purchase 1,495,000 shares of common
stock were outstanding, but were not included in the calculation of diluted
EPS
because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. Options and warrants
to
purchase 1,838,912 shares of common stock were outstanding at September 30,
2005, but were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because their
inclusion would have been antidilutive.
Stock-
Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“FAS No.
123R”). FAS No. 123R is a revision of
FAS
No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“FAS No. 123”), and supersedes
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (“APB No. 25”), and its related implementation guidance. On January 1,
2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 123R using the modified
prospective method. FAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions. The Statement requires entities to recognize compensation expense
for awards of equity instruments to employees based on grant-date fair value
of
those awards (with limited exceptions). FAS No. 123R also requires the benefits
of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported
as
a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as prescribed
under
the prior accounting rules. This requirement reduces net operating cash flows
and increases net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
For
the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded compensation expense
of
$238,000. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company
recorded $752,000 of compensation expense. Total cash flow remains unchanged
from what would have been reported under prior accounting rules. At
December 31, 2005, the Company had unamortized compensation expenses of
$397,000. This amount was reclassified to reduce the balance of additional
paid-in capital and is now part of our total unearned compensation of $1,874,000
remaining at September 30, 2006. These costs will be charged to expense in
future periods through 2009 in accordance with our FAS 123R accounting.
Additional options were granted in the three months ended September 30, 2006
and
have been valued in accordance with FAS 123R.
Our
stock-based compensation plans are described in detail in our Annual Report
Form
on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The
Fair
value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Sholes option pricing model. We granted 155,000 stock options during
the
third quarter and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The
fair
value of these stock options was determined using the following
assumptions:
Expected
volatility
|
60.30%
|
Treasury
rate
|
5.15%
|
Expected
term
|
4.00
|
Our
financial results were lower than under our previous method of accounting
for
stock-based compensation as follows:
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
||||||
September
30, 2006
|
September
30, 2006
|
||||||
Loss
from operations and net loss
|
$ | 258,000 | $ | 633,000 | |||
Basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
0.03 | 0.05 |
Prior
to
2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,
and
related Interpretations. The following table illustrates the effect on net
income (loss) and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation,
to
stock-based employee compensation for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three
months
ended
|
Nine
months
ended |
||||||
September
30, 2005
|
September
30, 2005
|
||||||
Net
loss, as reported
|
$
|
(2,074
|
)
|
$
|
(3,887
|
)
|
|
Add:
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net
income
(loss), net of related tax effects
|
5
|
212
|
|||||
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
fair
value based method for all awards, net of tax related
effects
|
(132
|
)
|
(498
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss Pro forma
|
$
|
(2,201
|
)
|
$
|
(4,173
|
)
|
|
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share—As reported
|
$
|
(.25
|
)
|
$
|
(.50
|
)
|
|
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share—Pro forma
|
$
|
(.27
|
)
|
$
|
(.54
|
)
|
Product
Warranties
The
Company warrants finished goods against defects in material and workmanship
under normal use and service for periods of one to three years for illuminators
and fiber. A liability for the estimated future costs under product warranties
is maintained for products outstanding under warranty (in thousands):
|
September
30, 2006
|
September
30, 2005
|
|||||
|
|||||||
Balance
at the beginning of the period
|
$
|
393
|
$
|
393
|
|||
Accruals
for warranties issued during the period
|
219
|
210
|
|||||
Settlements
made during the period (in cash or in kind)
|
(292
|
) | (210 | ) | |||
Balance
at the end of the period
|
$ | 320 | $ | 393 |
2.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost
determined using the first-in, first-out cost method) or market and consist
of
the following (in thousands):
|
September
30, 2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
|||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
6,017
|
$
|
6,431
|
|||
Inventory
Reserve
|
(564
|
)
|
(859
|
)
|
|||
Finished
goods
|
2,427
|
2,280
|
|||||
$
|
7,880
|
$
|
7,852
|
3.
Bank Borrowings
The
Company’s bank revolving line of credit is based on an agreement with Silicon
Valley Bank, this agreement is dated August 15, 2005. It was subsequently
amended and restated at December 31, 2005. It was further amended September
25,
2006 and extended through August 13, 2007. This credit facility is for
$5,000,000, bears interest equal to prime plus 1.75% per annum and is secured
by
accounts receivable. It has a minimum tangible net worth covenant which the
Company must meet going forward. The agreement includes an additional $3,000,000
term-loan line of credit for equipment purchases. This agreement calls for
repayment of principal
in
equal
amounts over 4 years from the date of purchase of the equipment and has an
interest rate of prime plus 0.5% if the quick ratio is greater than 1.5 and
prime plus 1.5% if the quick ratio is at or below 1.5. Borrowings under the
Silicon Valley Agreement are collateralized by the Company’s assets and
intellectual property. Specific borrowings under the revolver are tied to
accounts receivable and inventory balances, and the Company is required to
comply with certain covenants with respect to effective net worth and financial
ratios, which the Company met as of September 30, 2006. The Company had
borrowings under the revolving line of
credit
of $1,000,000 at September 30, 2006 and no borrowings at December 31,
2005.
The
Company had total borrowings of $2,430,000 under the term-loan portion of the
agreement as of September 30, 2006, and $1,092,000 as of December 31, 2005.
The
Company pays an unused line fee of 0.25% against any unused daily balance during
the year.
Through
its U.K. subsidiary, the Company maintains a bank overdraft facility
of
$468,000
(in
UK
pounds sterling, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) under an
agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc. There were no borrowings against this facility
as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The facility
is
renewed annually on January 1.
Through
its German subsidiary, the Company maintains a credit facility under an
agreement with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. This credit facility is in place to
finance our building of new offices in Berching, Germany, which is owned and
occupied by our German subsidiary. As of September 30, 2006 the Company had
borrowings of
$375,000
(in
Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) and $331,000 (in Euros,
based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2005) against this credit facility,
all of which comes due in 2008. In addition, our German subsidiary has a
revolving line of credit for $254,000 (in
Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) with Sparkasse Neumarkt
Bank. As of September 30, 2006 there were borrowings against this facility
of
$222,000 and $47,000 against this facility at December 31, 2005. The revolving
facility is renewed annually on January 1.
4.
Comprehensive Operations
Comprehensive
income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) plus sales, expenses, gains and
losses that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are included in
comprehensive income (loss) but excluded from net income (loss). A separate
statement of comprehensive operations has been presented with this
report.
5.
Segments and Geographic Information
The Company operates in a single industry segment that manufactures, markets, and sells fiber optic lighting products. The Company has two primary product lines: the pool and spa lighting product line and the commercial lighting product line, each of which markets and sells fiber optic lighting products. The Company markets its products for worldwide distribution primarily through independent sales representatives, distributors and swimming pool builders in North America, Europe and the Far East.
A
summary
of sales by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):
Three
months ended
September 30, |
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
U.S.
Domestic
|
$
|
4,487
|
$
|
4,347
|
$
|
13,862
|
$
|
15,081
|
|||||
Germany
|
614
|
1,057
|
2,077
|
2,469
|
|||||||||
U.K.
|
1,569
|
1,717
|
3,569
|
3,751
|
|||||||||
Other
countries
|
138
|
517
|
337
|
801
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
6,808
|
$
|
7,638
|
$
|
19,845
|
$
|
22,102
|
Geographic
sales are categorized based on the location of the customer to whom the sales
are made.
A
summary
of sales by product line is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
||||||||||||
Three
months ended
September 30, |
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Pool
and Spa Lighting
|
$
|
2,847
|
$
|
3,340
|
$
|
10,006
|
$
|
11,471
|
|||||
Commercial
Lighting
|
3,961
|
4,298
|
9,839
|
10,631
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
6,808
|
$
|
7,638
|
$
|
19,845
|
$
|
22,102
|
A
summary
of long-lived geographic assets (fixed assets and goodwill) is as follows (in
thousands):
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005
|
|||||
United
States Domestic
|
$
|
8,304
|
$
|
5,975
|
|||
Germany
|
1614
|
1,506 | |||||
Other
Countries
|
149
|
76 | |||||
$
|
10,067
|
$
|
7,557
|
6.
Recently adopted standards
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) as SFAS 123R,
“Share-Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires all entities to recognize
compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based
payments, such as stock options granted
to
employees. We applied SFAS 123R on a modified prospective method beginning
in
2006. Under this method, we have recorded compensation expense (as previous
awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards
that remain outstanding at January 1, 2006.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.151, “Inventory Costs,”
which
amends part of ARB 43, “Inventory Pricing,” concerning the treatment of certain
types of inventory costs. The provisions of ARB
43
provided that
certain
inventory-related costs, such as double freight, re-handling, might be “so
abnormal” that they should be charged against current earnings rather than be
included in the cost of inventory that is capitalized to future periods. As
amended by SFAS
No.
151,
the
“so-abnormal” criterion has been eliminated. Thus, all such “abnormal” costs are
required to be treated as current-period charges under all circumstances. In
addition, fixed production overhead should be allocated based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities, with unallocated overhead charged to
expense when incurred. SFAS 151 is required to be adopted for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The impacts of adopting SFAS No.151did not have
a
material impact on our overall financial position.
7.
Recent Pronouncements
In
July,
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”
providing guidance on the accounting for and reporting of corrections accounting
changes and error corrections. The standard is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The impact of adopting SFAS 154 is not
anticipated to have a material impact on our financial position.
In
July,
2006, the FASB issued FASB interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” (“FIN48”), an interpretation of FASB statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes”, regarding accounting for income tax uncertainties
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 will apply
to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109 on Accounting
for Income Taxes. The impact of adopting the positions of the interpretation
is
not anticipated to have a material impact on our overall financial
position.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission published Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 (Topic 1N), Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using
both the balance sheet and income statement approaches, with adjustment required
if either method results in a material error. The provisions of SAB No. 108
are
effective for annual financial statements for the fiscal year ending after
November 15, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we are evaluating the effect,
if
any, SAB No. 108 may have on our financial statements, but management does
not
currently believe SAB No. 108 will have a material effect upon initial
adoption.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This
Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies
under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements.
We
will adopt this standard January 1, 2008. We do not expect it to have a material
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
8.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of tangible and
identified intangible net assets of the businesses acquired. The Company has
$4,206,000 in goodwill on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2006 and
$4,135,000 at December 31, 2005. Goodwill
is not amortized, but is subjected to an annual impairment test. When events
or
changes in circumstances indicate that assets may be impaired, an evaluation is
performed comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated
with
the asset to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if a write-down to market
value or discounted cash flow is required. During
the period ending September 30, 2006, no instances or events required any
valuation or update.
9.
Income Taxes
A
full
valuation allowance is recorded against the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets
as management cannot conclude, based on available objective evidence, when
the
gross value of its deferred tax assets will be realized. The Company accrues
foreign tax expenses or benefits as these are incurred.
10. |
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
On
March
6, 2006, Ohms Electric, Inc. filed a complaint against Fiberstars, Inc. with
the
30th Judicial Circuit Court in the State of Michigan. The complaint requests
unspecified damages as a result of the Company’s product not working properly at
Neighborhood Cinema in Lansing, Michigan. Management does not believe the suit
will have a material affect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
11.
Reorganization
In
June
2005, the Company announced its plans to close its Fremont office and
consolidate most of its operations in Solon, Ohio, where the Company already
had
a local sales office and a manufacturing facility. The relocation was expected
to result in a restructuring charge of approximately $3,500,000 for severance
payments, redundancy, and lease and inventory write-offs. The Company recognized
a $3,120,000 restructuring charge in the year ended December 31, 2005. During
the first three quarters of 2006, the Company charged to Operations $734,000
for
costs associated with the reorganization.
12.
Related Party Transactions
The
Company entered into a consulting agreement with Jeffrey H. Brite, a member
of
its Board of Directors, effective date of November 1, 2004. As a consultant
under this agreement, Mr. Brite is to assist Fiberstars, Inc.’s President and
Vice President of Sales in identifying, contacting and making introductions
to
key building project personnel in a position to facilitate the purchase of
Fiberstars, Inc. products. In return, Fiberstars, Inc. compensated Mr. Brite
with the award of an option for the acquisition of up to 40,000 shares of its
common stock at a per share exercise price of $7.23 and with annual aggregate
cash payments of $50,000 to be paid in quarterly installments during each of
the
years 2005, 2006 and 2007. Payments in the third quarter of 2006 to Brite
totaled $15,500 and total $46,500 for the nine months ending September 30,
2006.
Payments in the third quarter of 2005 totaled $15,000 and for the nine months
ending September 30, 2005 totaled $30,000.
Gensler
Architecture, Design & Plannning, P.C., a New York Professional Corporation
(“Gensler”) provides contract services to the Company in the areas of fixture
design and marketing, targeted at expanding the
market
for the Company’s EFO™ products.
Mr. Jeffrey Brite, an employee of Gensler, is a member of the Company’s Board of
Directors. The Company entered into a three year consulting agreement with
Gensler, effective December 15, 2004. Gensler has agreed to assist Fiberstars’
marketing group with matters of structure, procedure and practices as they
relate to the design, real estate and procurement communities, and to advise
Fiberstars on strategies to enhance its visibility and image within the design
and construction community as a manufacturer of preferred technology. In return,
Fiberstars compensated Gensler with a one-time cash payment in 2005 of $60,750
for services delivered in advance of the completion of the negotiation of the
Consulting Agreement, $50,000 annual cash payments to be paid in quarterly
installments of $12,500 in arrears for each of the calendar years 2005, 2006
and
2007, and a one-time option award to acquire up to 75,000 shares of Fiberstars’
common stock at a per share exercise price of $6.57. During the third quarter
of
2006, the Company paid Gensler $12,500 and $37,500 for the nine months ending
September 30, 2006 compared to $12,500 in the third quarter of 2005 and $25,000
for the nine months ending September 30, 2005.
On
July
1, 2005, David Ruckert, the Company’s CEO resigned as CEO and served as
President and Director through September 30, 2005 after which he served as
Director. Mr. Ruckert signed a severance agreement with the Company which was
effective July 1, 2005, and which resulted in a payment in 2005 of $332,076
upon
his departure as an employee, October 1, 2005. Mr. Ruckert also entered into
a
consulting agreement with the Company on December 9, 2005. Payments to Mr.
Ruckert in the third quarter of 2006 totaled $13,000 and $82,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006.
On
September 19, 2005, the Company entered into a master services agreement and
related ancillary agreements with Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. (“ADLT”).
These agreements include development agreements governing the provision of
research and development services by ADLT to the Company and by the Company
to
ADLT, which agreements are subject to pre-determined cost limitations and the
ability of either party to terminate these agreements for convenience and with
proper notice, and under which the Company expects ADLT to develop new lamps
for
the Company’s energy efficient lighting system known as EFO™, and ADLT expects
the Company to adapt the Company’s patented CPC optic technology to certain ADLT
products; an equipment purchase and supply agreement governing the Company’s
purchase of manufacturing equipment from ADLT and the supply of support and
manufacturing services by ADLT related to the purchased equipment; a mutual
supply agreement governing the sale and purchase of the Company’s products by
ADLT and of ADLT’s products by the Company; and a cross license agreement
governing the mutual grant of rights and licenses between the Company and ADLT
for specified uses of intellectual property. These agreements became effective
upon ADLT’s sale of certain shares of the Company’s Common Stock on November 8,
2005, as described in a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 2005, in which ADLT
participated as a selling shareholder and their shares of the company stock
were
sold. ADLT has no remaining ownership interest in the Company.
Purchases
from ADLT, excluding rent, were $165,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and
$1,639,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Purchases in 2006
included $1,325,000 in capital equipment and purchases in the third quarter
of
2005 and nine months ending September 30, 2005 were $112,000 and $305,000,
respectively. Purchases in the fourth quarter of 2005 included $1,092,000 in
capital equipment. Sales to ADLT were $3,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and
$114,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2006, compared to $80,000
and
$121,000 for the third quarter and nine months ending of September 30, 2005.
Accounts receivable with ADLT were $55,000 at September 30, 2006 and $132,000
at
December 31, 2005. These amounts are included in the accounts receivable trade
balance on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Accounts payable were
$16,000 at September 30, 2006 and $33,000 at December 31, 2005, respectively.
These amounts are included in the accounts payable trade balance on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Further,
as a part of our relocation of our base operations from Fremont, California
to
Solon, Ohio, we expanded our lease with ADLT to rent a portion of their building
in Solon, Ohio. During the second quarter of 2006, the lease was assigned to
a
non-related third party and extended through 2011. There were no lease payments
to ADLT in the third quarter of 2006. Lease payments for the nine months ending
September 30, 2006 totaled $138,000. Lease payments were $46,000 in the third
quarter of 2005 and $98,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2005.
This
site is now the Company’s Corporate Administrative headquarters, Engineering,
and Commercial sales and operations hub.
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and
the
section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
When
used in this discussion, the words "expects," "anticipates," "estimates,"
“plan,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements, which include statements as to our expected sales
and gross profit margins, expected operating expenses and capital expenditure
levels, our sales and marketing expenses, our general and administrative
expenses, expected expenses related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of
2002, the adequacy of capital resources and necessity to raise additional funds,
our critical accounting policies, expected restructuring costs related to our
consolidation in Solon, Ohio, expected benefits from our consolidation and
statements regarding pending litigation are subject to risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.
These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed
below, as well as our ability to manage expenses, our ability to reduce
manufacturing overhead and general and administrative expenses as a percentage
of sales, our ability to collect on doubtful accounts receivable, our ability
to
increase cash balances in future quarters, the cost of enforcing or defending
intellectual property, unforeseen adverse competitive, economic or other factors
that may impact our cash position, risks associated with raising additional
funds, and risks associated with our pending litigation. These forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any
obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our
expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
sales
decreased 11% to $6,808,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as
compared to the same quarter a year ago. The decrease was primarily a result
of
lower pool sales (down 15%) due to the slowdown in housing starts along with
lower sales from Europe (down 29%) as a result of a large one-time sale in
the
third quarter of 2005 which was not duplicated in the third quarter of 2006.
These shortfalls were partially offset by higher EFO sales of $1,346,000 in
the
quarter compared to $454,000 in the third quarter of 2005. Third quarter sales
include $850,000 in revenue from the achievement of Navy ship install contract
milestones. Net sales for the first nine months of 2006 were $19,845,000
compared to net sales of $22,102,000 for the same period in 2005, a decrease
of
10%. The sales decrease in the first nine months is also due to lower
traditional fiber optic sales in pool lighting products (down 13%) and Europe
(down 15%) partially offset by higher EFO sales, which were $2,547,000 for
nine
months ending September 30, 2006 compared to $1,220,000 for the nine months
ending September 30, 2005. Due to lower sales in the traditional fiber optic
lines, pool lighting and traditional commercial, we expect overall sales to
be
down for fiscal 2006. However, the market for our products is highly dependent
upon general economic conditions.
On
March
31, 2006, we announced that we had received funding from DARPA for $2,100,000
to
develop and install our high efficiency distributed lighting systems as a
“commercial” product on three US Navy ships. This project will result in revenue
being recognized on a percentage of completion basis as milestones are completed
over the next two years. We recognized revenue of $850,000 in the third quarter
of 2006 and $1,399,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 for the
completion of milestones.
Gross
profit was $2,036,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, a 31% decrease
compared to the same period in the prior year. The gross profit margin as a
percentage of sales decreased from 39% for the third quarter of fiscal 2005
to
30 % for the third quarter of 2006. Gross profit margin declined primarily
due
to lower gross profit margins on U.S. pool lighting and commercial lighting
sales. Gross profit for the first nine months of 2006 was $5,966,000, a decrease
of 29% over gross profit margins for the same period in 2005. This represents
gross profit margins of 30% for the first nine months of 2006 compared to 38%
in
2005. The decline was due to lower margins on U.S. pool lighting and commercial
lighting sales. It was partially offset by higher margins in Europe due to
increased margins on several projects. We expect gross profit margins for the
full 2006 year, to be lower than 2005, assuming general economic conditions
remain consistent.
Research
and development expenses were $630,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006,
a
decrease of $9,000 compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Gross
expenses for research and development decreased by 34% due to lower project
costs and due to engineering costs associated with delivering the Navy ship
install milestones being included in cost of sales in the third quarter of
2006,
whereas there were no such reclassed expenses in 2005. Our research and
development expense are reduced by credits received for achieving milestones
under a development contract with the Department of Energy, “DOE” that was
signed in 2005 for a total of $1,500,000. In addition, further awards were
taken
for a Small Business Innovative Research award with the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency, “DARPA” totaling $199,000 signed in October, 2005.
Gross research and development expenses were $2,658,000 in the first 9 months
of
2006, compared to $3,149,000 for the same period in 2005. The decrease was
a
result of lower project costs and engineering costs included in cost of sales
for the first nine months of 2006 as discussed above for the quarter. The gross
research and development spending along with credits from government contracts
is shown in the table:
Three
months ended
September
30,
2006
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
2006
|
||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Gross
expenses for research and development
|
$
|
827
|
$
|
1,253
|
$
|
2,658
|
$
|
3,149
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Deduct:
credits from DARPA & DOE contracts
|
(197
|
)
|
(614
|
)
|
(1,137
|
)
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|||||
Net
research and development expense
|
$
|
630
|
$
|
639
|
$
|
1,521
|
$
|
1,516
|
We
expect
research and development expense nearly flat for the full year 2006 compared
to
2005 due to reduced DARPA credits offset by lower gross expenses as discussed
above.
Sales
and
marketing expenses decreased by 13% to $2,280,000 in the third quarter of fiscal
2006 as compared to $2,611,000 for the same period in fiscal 2005. The decrease
is due to a one time increase in pool sales and marketing expense in the third
quarter of 2005 due to expenses associated with the settlement of a lawsuit
with
Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. There was no such legal expense in 2006. Sales
and marketing expense decreased by 3% to $7,132,000 in the first nine months
of
2006 as compared to the same period in 2005, for the same reason it decreased
for the quarter as described above. We expect sales and marketing expenses
to
increase slightly for the full year 2006 as we anticipate increasing our sales
and marketing efforts for our new products.
General
and administrative expenses were $1,303,000 in the third quarter of fiscal
2006,
an increase of 70% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase
was primarily due to the impact of expense recognized under FAS123R ($238,000),
Sarbanes Oxley ($88,000) and increased bad debt expenses ($175,000). We will
be
required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
December 31, 2006. Estimates of costs required in order to comply with Section
404 for a company of our size range in the order of $600,000 or higher,
independent of additional audit fees of which approximately $350,000 has been
recorded through September 30th.
These
additional expenses will be incurred in the remainder of fiscal year 2006.
General and administrative expenses were $3,918,000 for the first nine months
of
2006 compared to $2,324,000 for the same period in 2005. The increase is
primarily due to option expenses and compliance costs associated with
Sarbanes-Oxley. We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to
increase in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to anticipated higher administration
accounting costs and expenses associated with the impact of the Sarbanes- Oxley
Act of 2002 and option expense under FAS123R.
In
June
2005, we announced our plans to close our Fremont office and consolidate most
of
our operations in Solon, Ohio, where we have a local sales office and a
manufacturing facility. The relocation resulted in a restructuring charge of
approximately $3,100,000 for severance payments, redundancy, and lease and
inventory write-offs for the fiscal year 2005. During the first nine months
of
2006, we charged to operations $734,000 for costs associated with this
restructuring. Additional restructuring costs were necessary in 2006 beyond
what
was originally estimated in order to further consolidate distribution operations
into our Mexican production site. Restructuring is now complete and there will
be no further costs charged in 2006. We expect the total restructuring to
produce cost savings of between $1,500,000 and $2,000,000 on an annual basis,
and we have begun to see the impact of this savings in Q3 of 2006. These savings
will be reflected largely in reduced cost of sales with a lesser amount in
operating expenses. These savings are being offset by expense increases as
a
result of building capacity and increasing expenses for development, sales
and
marketing of new products, primarily EFO, and also new pool lighting
products.
We
recorded a net loss of $2,125,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as
compared to a net loss of $2,074,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. The
net loss for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $6,866,000
and $3,887,000, respectively. The net loss in 2006 was due primarily to soft
sales, reduced margin from changes in product mix, and higher operating
expenses.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
and cash equivalents
At
September 30, 2006, our cash and cash equivalents were $3,319,000 as compared
to
$5,554,000 at December 31, 2005, a net cash decrease of $2,235,000 during the
first nine months of 2006. This compares to a net cash increase of $757,000
for
the same period in 2005, and an ending cash balance of $4,366,000 as of
September 30, 2005. We also had $14,597,000 in short-term securities at
September 30, 2006 as compared to $18,024,000 in short-term securities at
December 31, 2005, a decrease of $3,427,000.
Due
to
seasonality in the sales of our pool lighting products, our cash balances tend
to decrease in the first half of the year and increase in the second half of
the
year. This year we expect there to be some cash utilization in the second half
of the year due to increased investment in new products, however at a slower
rate than in the first half. This is subject to the condition that the market
for our products is highly dependent upon general economic
conditions.
Cash
was
used in the period to purchase fixed assets and pay other accruals from December
31, 2005 relating to costs incurred in 2005 for our restructuring and resolution
of legal commitments.
Cash
provided by (used in) Investing Activities
Investing
activities provided cash of $205,000 during the first nine months of 2006,
compared to a use of cash of $532,000 for the same period of 2005. During both
periods, cash was used for the acquisition of fixed assets. Fixed asset
purchases from ADLT were $1,325,000 in the first nine months of 2006. The
increase was due to additional fixed assets required in order to move forward
with the EFO product line and future R & D efforts. The sale of short-term
securities in 2006 provided cash to fund fixed asset purchases and
operations.
Cash
Provided by Financing Activities
Financing
activities contributed $3,177,000 to cash during the first nine months of 2006.
This net contribution was due primarily from long and short term borrowings
of
$2,875,000 and the exercise of warrants and employee stock options for $565,000.
For the same period in 2005, financing activities, from the exercise of warrants
and employee stock options, were $1,530,000.
The
Company has a $5,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (Accounts Receivable and
Inventory) with Silicon Valley Bank. This agreement is dated August 15, 2005.
It
was subsequently amended and restated at December 31, 2005. It was further
amended September 25, 2006 and extended through August 13, 2007. The interest
rate equals prime plus 1.75% per annum computed daily. Borrowings under this
Loan and Security Agreement were collateralized by its assets and intellectual
property. Specific borrowings were tied to accounts receivable and inventory
balances, and the Company is required to comply with certain covenants with
respect to effective net worth. The Company had $1,000,000 of borrowings against
this facility as of June 30, 2006 and no borrowings at December 31, 2005. The
Company had total borrowings of $2,430,000 under the term-loan agreement as
of
September 30, 2006 and $1,092,000 as of December 31, 2005. The Company was
in
conformity with the bank covenants of the Silicon Valley Bank agreement as
of
September 30, 2006.
Through
our U.K. subsidiary, we maintain a $468,000 (in UK pounds sterling based on
the
exchange rate at September 30, 2006) bank overdraft agreement with Lloyds Bank
Plc through its UK subsidiary. There were no borrowings against this facility
as
of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The facility is renewed annually
on
January 1 and bears an interest rate of 7%.
Through
our German subsidiary, we maintain a credit facility under an agreement with
Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. This credit facility is in place to finance, and is
secured by, our offices owned and occupied by our German subsidiary. As of
September 30, 2006 we had total borrowings of $375,000 (in Euros, based on
the
exchange rate at June 30, 2006) against this credit facility. As of December
31,
2005, we had $331,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31,
2005) borrowed against this facility. Additionally, we have a revolving line
of
credit of $254,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006)
with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. As of September 30, 2006 there were borrowings
against this facility of $222,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at
September 30, 2006), and there were $47,000 of borrowings against this facility
as of December 31, 2005 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31,
2005). The facility is renewed annually on January 1 and bears an interest
rate
of 8.75%.
We
believe that our existing cash balances and funds available to us through our
bank lines of credit together with funds that we anticipate generating from
our
operations, will be sufficient to finance our currently anticipated working
capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements for the next twelve
months. However, a sudden increase in product demand requiring a
significant increase in manufacturing capability, or unforeseen adverse
competitive, economic or other factors may impact our cash position, and thereby
affect operations. From time to time we may be required to raise
additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships
or
other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such funding, if
needed, will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Furthermore, any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders,
and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Strategic
arrangements, if necessary to raise additional funds, may require that we
relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products. Failure to
generate sufficient revenues or to raise capital when needed could have an
adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition,
as
well as our ability to achieve intended business objectives.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of our financial statements requires that we make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingencies and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
in
the financial statements. Material differences may result in the amount and
timing of revenue and expenses if different judgments or different estimates
were utilized. Critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates which
we
believe have the most significant impact on our financial statements include
allowances for doubtful accounts, returns, warranties, valuation of inventories,
and stock based compensation. For the detailed discussion of the application
of
policies critical to our business operations, see our Annual Report Form on
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
RECENTLY
ADOPTED STANDARDS
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) as SFAS 123R,
“Share-Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires all entities to recognize
compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based
payments, such as stock options granted
to
employees. We applied SFAS 123R on a modified prospective method beginning
in
2006. Under this method, we have recorded compensation expense (as previous
awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards
that remain outstanding at January 1, 2006.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.151, “Inventory Costs,”
which
amends part of ARB 43, “Inventory Pricing,” concerning the treatment of certain
types of inventory costs. The provisions of ARB
43
provided that
certain
inventory-related costs, such as double freight, re-handling, might be “so
abnormal” that they should be charged against current earnings rather than be
included in the cost of inventory that is capitalized to future periods. As
amended by SFAS
No.
151,
the
“so-abnormal” criterion has been eliminated. Thus, all such “abnormal” costs are
required to be treated as current-period charges under all circumstances. In
addition, fixed production overhead should be allocated based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities, with unallocated overhead charged to
expense when incurred. SFAS 151 is required to be adopted for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The impacts of adopting SFAS No.151did not have
a
material impact on our overall financial position.
RECENT
PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
July,
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”
providing guidance on the accounting for and reporting of corrections accounting
changes and error corrections. The standard is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The impact of adopting SFAS 154 is not
anticipated to have a material impact on our financial position.
In
July,
2006, the FASB issued FASB interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” (“FIN48”), an interpretation of FASB statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes”, regarding accounting for income tax uncertainties
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 will apply
to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109 on Accounting
for Income Taxes. The impact of adopting the positions of the interpretation
is
not anticipated to have a material impact on our overall financial
position.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission published Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 (Topic 1N), Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements. SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using
both the balance sheet and income statement approaches, with adjustment required
if either method results in a material error. The provisions of SAB No. 108
are
effective for annual financial statements for the fiscal year ending after
November 15, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we are evaluating the effect,
if
any, SAB No. 108 may have on our financial statements, but management does
not
currently believe SAB No. 108 will have a material effect upon initial
adoption.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This
Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies
under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements.
We
will adopt this standard January 1, 2008. We do not expect it to have a material
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As
of
September 30, 2006, we had $606,000 in cash held in foreign currencies based
on
the exchange rates at September 30, 2006. The balances for cash held overseas
in
foreign currencies are subject to exchange rate risk. We have a policy of
maintaining cash balances in local currencies unless an amount of cash is
occasionally transferred in order to repay inter-company debts.
As
of
September 30, 2006 we had borrowings of $222,000 (in Euros, based on the
exchange rate at September 30, 2006) against a credit facility secured by real
property owned by our German subsidiary. As of December 31, 2005, we had $47,000
(in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2005) borrowed against
this credit facility.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
(a) Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures.
We
maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures,
no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and
procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed
to
meet, and management believes they meet, reasonable assurance standards.
Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management
necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of
any
disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions.
Based
on
their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating
to
us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to them by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.
(b) Changes
in internal control over financial reporting.
There
was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation
during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
On
March
6, 2006, Ohms Electric, Inc. filed a complaint against Fiberstars, Inc. with
the
30th Judicial Circuit Court in the State of Michigan. The complaint requests
unspecified damages as a result of the Company’s product not working properly at
Neighborhood Cinema in Lansing, Michigan. Management does not believe the suit
will have a material affect on our financial condition.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
are
no significant changes in risk factors from our Annual Report Form 10-K for
the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Documents
|
|||
10.1
|
Amendment
No. 1 To Amended And Restated Loan And Security Agreement between
Fiberstars, Inc and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 25,
2006
|
|||
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|||
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|||
32.1**
|
Statement
of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
|
|||
32.2**
|
Statement
of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
|
** In accordance with item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
FIBERSTARS,
INC.
|
|||||
Date:
November 14, 2006
|
By:
|
/s/
John M. Davenport
|
|||
John
M. Davenport
|
|||||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|||||
By:
|
/s/
Robert A. Connors
|
||||
Robert
A. Connors
|
|||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|||||
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
Exhibit
Index
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Documents
|
|||
10.1
|
Amendment
No. 1 To Amended And Restated Loan And Security Agreement between
Fiberstars, Inc and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 25,
2006
|
|||
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|||
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|||
32.1**
|
Statement
of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
|
|||
32.2**
|
Statement
of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
|