Annual Statements Open main menu

ENERGY FOCUS, INC/DE - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)

Unassociated Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q
 
(Mark one)

ý
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

OR

o
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from_________to ___________

Commission file number  0-24230


FIBERSTARS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 

California
 
94-3021850
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
32000 Aurora Rd., Solon, OH
(Address of principal executive offices)
     
44139
(Zip Code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (440) 715-1300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One) Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer ý
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
 
The number of outstanding shares of the registrants’ Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, as of September 30, 2006 was 11,378,103.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

 Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1
 
 Financial Statements:
 
     
 a.
 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005
 3
     
 b.
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended
 
       
 September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
 4
     
 c.
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Operations for the Three Months and Nine
 
       
 Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
 5
     
 d.
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
 
       
 and 2005 (unaudited)
 6
     
 e.
 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
 7
Item
2
 
 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 14
Item
3
 
 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 18
Item
4
 
 Controls and Procedures
 18
       
Part II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item
1
 
 Legal Proceedings
 20
Item
1
A
 Risk Factors
 20
Item
6
 
 Exhibits
 21
     
 Signatures
 22
     
 Exhibit Index
 23

 


Item 1. Financial Statements

FIBERSTARS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands)

 

 
   
September 30, 2006 
   
December 31,
2005
 
 
   
(unaudited) 
       
ASSETS
             
Current assets:
             
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
3,319
 
$
5,554
 
Short-term investments
   
14,597
   
18,024
 
Accounts receivable trade, net
   
5,338
   
6,287
 
Inventories, net
   
7,880
   
7,852
 
Prepaid and other current assets
   
635
   
879
 
Total current assets
   
31,769
   
38,596
 
               
Fixed assets, net
   
5,861
   
3,422
 
Goodwill, net
   
4,206
   
4,135
 
Other assets
   
---
   
56
 
Total assets
 
$
41,836
 
$
46,209
 
               
LIABILITIES
             
Current liabilities:
             
Accounts payable
 
$
2,952
 
$
2,623
 
Accrued liabilities
   
1,900
   
3,924
 
Short-term bank borrowings
   
1,897
   
389
 
Total current liabilities
   
6,749
   
6,936
 
Long-term bank borrowings
   
2,130
   
1,089
 
Total liabilities
   
8,879
   
8,025
 
               
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
             
Common stock
   
1
   
1
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
53,399
   
52,452
 
Unearned stock-based compensation
   
---
   
(397
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
   
337
   
41
 
Accumulated deficit
   
(20,780
)
 
(13,913
)
Total shareholders’ equity
   
32,957
   
38,184
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
41,836
 
$
46,209
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
 


FIBERSTARS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands except per share amounts)
(unaudited)




     
Three months ended
September 30,
 
   
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
 
     
2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
 
Net sales
 
$
6,808
 
$
7,638
 
$
19,845
 
$
22,102
 
Cost of sales
   
4,772
   
4,680
   
13,879
   
13,679
 
Gross profit
   
2,036
   
2,958
   
5,966
   
8,423
 
Operating expenses:
                         
                           
Research and development
   
630
   
639
   
1,521
   
1,516
 
Sales and marketing
   
2,280
   
2,611
   
7,132
   
7,319
 
General and administrative
   
1,303
   
766
   
3,918
   
2,324
 
Restructure Expense
   
98
   
904
   
734
   
1,102
 
Total operating expenses
   
4,311
   
4,920
   
13,305
   
12,261
 
Loss from operations
   
(2,275
)
 
(1,962
)
 
(7,339
)
 
(3,838
)
Other income (expense):
                         
Other income/(expense)
   
6
   
(11
)
 
19
   
10
 
Interest income/ (expense)
   
177
   
(11
)
 
351
   
4
 
                           
Profit (loss) before income taxes
   
(2,092
)
 
(1,984
)
 
(6,969
)
 
(3,824
)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes
   
(33
)
 
(90
)
 
103
   
(63
)
Net loss
 
$
(2,125
)
$
(2,074
)
$
(6,866
)
$
(3,887
)
                           
Net loss per share - basic and diluted
 
$
(.19
)
$
(.25
)
$
(.60
)
$
(.50
)
                           
Shares used in computing net loss per share - basic and diluted
   
11,371
   
8,169
   
11,362
   
7,782
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements


 
FIBERSTARS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
     
Three months Ended
September 30,
 
   
Nine months Ended
September 30,
 
 
     
2006 
   
2005 
   
2006 
   
2005 
 
                           
Net loss
 
$
(2,125
)
$
(2,074
)
$
(6,866
)
$
(3,887
)
                           
Other comprehensive income (loss)
                         
Foreign currency translation adjustments
   
41
   
(75
)
 
217
   
(401
)
Net unrealized gain on securities
   
(67
)
 
--
   
79
   
--
 
Comprehensive loss
 
$
(2,151
)
$
(2,149
)
$
(6,570
)
$
(4,288
)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements



 
FIBERSTARS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)

 


     
Nine Months Ended September 30, 
 
     
2006
   
2005
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
             
Net loss
 
$
(6,866
)
$
(3,887
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
             
Depreciation and amortization
   
782
   
887
 
Stock-based compensation
   
752
   
334
 
Unrealized gain from marketable securities
   
79
   
-----
 
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable
   
175
   
-----
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
             
Accounts receivable
   
894
   
2,260
 
Inventories
   
109
   
100
 
Prepaid and other current assets
   
248
   
(542
)
Other assets
   
56
   
35
 
Accounts payable
   
201
   
(112
)
Accrued liabilities
   
(2,066
)
 
746
 
Total adjustments
   
1,230
   
3,708
 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
   
(5,636
)
 
(179
)
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
             
Purchase of short-term investments
   
(91,506
)
 
------
 
Sale of short-term investments
   
94,933
   
------
 
Acquisition of fixed assets
   
(3,222
)
 
(532
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   
205
   
(532
)
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
             
Cash proceeds from exercise of stock options
   
565
   
1,530
 
Proceeds from short-term bank borrowings
   
1,222
   
-----
 
Proceeds from long-term bank borrowings
   
1,653
   
-----
 
Payments of short and long-term bank borrowings
   
(325
)
 
-----
 
Collection of loan made to shareholder
   
62
   
-----
 
Other long-term liabilities
   
----
   
106
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
   
3,177
   
1,636
 
               
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
   
19
   
(168
)
               
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
   
(2,235
)
 
757
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
   
5,554
   
3,609
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
3,319
 
$
4,366
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
 


FIBERSTARS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)
Although unaudited, the interim financial statements in this report reflect all adjustments, consisting only of all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods covered and of the financial condition of Fiberstars, Inc. (the “Company”) at the interim balance sheet date. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire year.

Year-end Balance Sheet
The year-end balance sheet information was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005, contained in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Short-term Investments
The Company’s short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale, which are stated at estimated fair value. The Company has determined its short-term investments are available to support current operations and, accordingly, has classified such short-term investments as current assets without regard for contractual maturities. These short-term investments are invested through a major financial institution. The unrealized gains or losses on these short-term investments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholder’s equity until realized.

Short-term investments at September 30, 2006 were as follows (in thousands):

 
 
   
Cost 
   
Net
unrealized gain
   
Estimated Fair Value
 
Money Market Fund
 
$
128
 
$
--
 
$
128
 
Agencies
   
3,599
   
65
   
3,664
 
Commercial Paper
   
8,725
   
25
   
8,750
 
Taxable Floating Rate Notes
   
1,450
   
--
   
1,450
 
Municipal Bonds
   
600
   
5
   
605
 
Total
 
$
14,502
 
$
95
 
$
14,597
 

The short-term investments maturing over the next year total $10,741,000. The remaining short-term investments have scheduled maturity dates from October 2007 through December 2036.

The change in net unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale in the amount of $(67,000) has been charged to other comprehensive income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Proceeds from the sale of available securities during 2006 were approximately $95,000,000. Gross gains of $408,000 were realized on the sales of available for sale securities during 2006. These gains on interest bearing securities are included as part of the Interest Income/(expense) in the Statement of Operations.

Foreign Currency Translation
The Company’s international subsidiaries use their local currency as their functional currency. For those subsidiaries, assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and income and expense accounts at average exchange rates during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded to a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
 

 
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing income available to shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental shares upon exercise of stock options and warrants.

A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS is provided as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
       
     
Three months ended
September 30,
 
   
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
 
     
2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
 
Numerator - net loss
 
$
(2,125
)
$
(2,074
)
$
(6,866
)
$
(3,887
)
Denominator - Basic and Diluted EPS
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding
   
11,371
   
8,169
   
11,362
   
7,782
 
Basic and Diluted net loss per share
 
$
(.19
)
$
(.25
)
$
(.60
)
$
(.50
)
 
At September 30, 2006, options and warrants to purchase 1,495,000 shares of common stock were outstanding, but were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would have been antidilutive. Options and warrants to purchase 1,838,912 shares of common stock were outstanding at September 30, 2005, but were not included in the calculation of diluted EPS because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
 
Stock- Based Compensation

In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“FAS No. 123R”). FAS No. 123R is a revision of
FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“FAS No. 123”), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB No. 25”), and its related implementation guidance. On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method. FAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. The Statement requires entities to recognize compensation expense for awards of equity instruments to employees based on grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). FAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as prescribed under the prior accounting rules. This requirement reduces net operating cash flows and increases net financing cash flows in periods after adoption.
 
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded compensation expense of $238,000. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded $752,000 of compensation expense. Total cash flow remains unchanged from what would have been reported under prior accounting rules.  At December 31, 2005, the Company had unamortized compensation expenses of $397,000. This amount was reclassified to reduce the balance of additional paid-in capital and is now part of our total unearned compensation of $1,874,000 remaining at September 30, 2006. These costs will be charged to expense in future periods through 2009 in accordance with our FAS 123R accounting. Additional options were granted in the three months ended September 30, 2006 and have been valued in accordance with FAS 123R.
 
Our stock-based compensation plans are described in detail in our Annual Report Form on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The Fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Sholes option pricing model. We granted 155,000 stock options during the third quarter and for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

The fair value of these stock options was determined using the following assumptions:

Expected volatility
60.30%
Treasury rate
5.15%
Expected term
4.00

Our financial results were lower than under our previous method of accounting for stock-based compensation as follows:

   
Three months ended
 
Nine months ended
 
   
September 30, 2006
 
September 30, 2006
 
Loss from operations and net loss
  $ 258,000   $  633,000  
Basic and diluted net loss per share
    0.03     0.05  


 
Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
     
Three months ended
   
Nine months
ended 
 
     
September 30, 2005
   
September 30, 2005
 
               
Net loss, as reported
 
$
(2,074
)
$
(3,887
)
               
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss), net of related tax effects
   
5
   
212
 
               
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax related effects
   
(132
)
 
(498
)
                         
Net loss Pro forma
 
$
(2,201
)
$
(4,173
)
               
Basic and Diluted net loss per share—As reported
 
$
(.25
)
$
(.50
)
               
Basic and Diluted net loss per share—Pro forma
 
$
(.27
)
$
(.54
)

Product Warranties

The Company warrants finished goods against defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service for periods of one to three years for illuminators and fiber. A liability for the estimated future costs under product warranties is maintained for products outstanding under warranty (in thousands):

 
   
September 30, 2006 
   
September 30, 2005
 
           
 
Balance at the beginning of the period
 
$
393
 
$
393
 
Accruals for warranties issued during the period
   
219
   
210
 
Settlements made during the period (in cash or in kind) 
   
(292
)    (210 ) 
Balance at the end of the period 
  $  320   $  393  
 

 
2. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost (which approximates actual cost determined using the first-in, first-out cost method) or market and consist of the following (in thousands):

 
   
September 30, 2006 
   
December 31,
2005
 
               
Raw materials
 
$
6,017
 
$
6,431
 
Inventory Reserve
   
(564
)
 
(859
)
Finished goods
   
2,427
   
2,280
 
   
$
7,880
 
$
7,852
 

3. Bank Borrowings

The Company’s bank revolving line of credit is based on an agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, this agreement is dated August 15, 2005. It was subsequently amended and restated at December 31, 2005. It was further amended September 25, 2006 and extended through August 13, 2007. This credit facility is for $5,000,000, bears interest equal to prime plus 1.75% per annum and is secured by accounts receivable. It has a minimum tangible net worth covenant which the Company must meet going forward. The agreement includes an additional $3,000,000 term-loan line of credit for equipment purchases. This agreement calls for repayment of principal in equal amounts over 4 years from the date of purchase of the equipment and has an interest rate of prime plus 0.5% if the quick ratio is greater than 1.5 and prime plus 1.5% if the quick ratio is at or below 1.5. Borrowings under the Silicon Valley Agreement are collateralized by the Company’s assets and intellectual property. Specific borrowings under the revolver are tied to accounts receivable and inventory balances, and the Company is required to comply with certain covenants with respect to effective net worth and financial ratios, which the Company met as of September 30, 2006. The Company had borrowings under the revolving line of credit of $1,000,000 at September 30, 2006 and no borrowings at December 31, 2005. The Company had total borrowings of $2,430,000 under the term-loan portion of the agreement as of September 30, 2006, and $1,092,000 as of December 31, 2005. The Company pays an unused line fee of 0.25% against any unused daily balance during the year.
 
Through its U.K. subsidiary, the Company maintains a bank overdraft facility of $468,000 (in UK pounds sterling, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) under an agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc. There were no borrowings against this facility as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The facility is renewed annually on January 1.

Through its German subsidiary, the Company maintains a credit facility under an agreement with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. This credit facility is in place to finance our building of new offices in Berching, Germany, which is owned and occupied by our German subsidiary. As of September 30, 2006 the Company had borrowings of $375,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) and $331,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2005) against this credit facility, all of which comes due in 2008. In addition, our German subsidiary has a revolving line of credit for $254,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. As of September 30, 2006 there were borrowings against this facility of $222,000 and $47,000 against this facility at December 31, 2005. The revolving facility is renewed annually on January 1.

4. Comprehensive Operations

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income (loss) plus sales, expenses, gains and losses that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are included in comprehensive income (loss) but excluded from net income (loss). A separate statement of comprehensive operations has been presented with this report.
 
5.  Segments and Geographic Information

The Company operates in a single industry segment that manufactures, markets, and sells fiber optic lighting products. The Company has two primary product lines: the pool and spa lighting product line and the commercial lighting product line, each of which markets and sells fiber optic lighting products. The Company markets its products for worldwide distribution primarily through independent sales representatives, distributors and swimming pool builders in North America, Europe and the Far East.
 


A summary of sales by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):
 
     
Three months ended 
September 30, 
   
Nine months ended
September 30, 
 
     
2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
 
     
   
   
   
 
U.S. Domestic
 
$
4,487
 
$
4,347
 
$
13,862
 
$
15,081
 
Germany
   
614
   
1,057
   
2,077
   
2,469
 
U.K.
   
1,569
   
1,717
   
3,569
   
3,751
 
Other countries
   
138
   
517
   
337
   
801
 
 
 
$
6,808
 
$
7,638
 
$
19,845
 
$
22,102
 

Geographic sales are categorized based on the location of the customer to whom the sales are made.

A summary of sales by product line is as follows (in thousands):
 
   
 
     
Three months ended
September 30, 
   
Nine months ended
September 30, 
 
     
2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
 
     
   
   
   
 
Pool and Spa Lighting
 
$
2,847
 
$
3,340
 
$
10,006
 
$
11,471
 
Commercial Lighting
   
3,961
   
4,298
   
9,839
   
10,631
 
 
 
$
6,808
 
$
7,638
 
$
19,845
 
$
22,102
 

A summary of long-lived geographic assets (fixed assets and goodwill) is as follows (in thousands):

 
   
September 30,
2006 
   
December 31,
2005
 
               
United States Domestic
 
$
8,304
 
$
5,975
 
Germany 
   
1614
     1,506  
Other Countries 
   
149
     76  
   
$
10,067
 
$
7,557
 

6. Recently adopted standards

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) as SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires all entities to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, such as stock options granted to employees. We applied SFAS 123R on a modified prospective method beginning in 2006. Under this method, we have recorded compensation expense (as previous awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at January 1, 2006.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.151, “Inventory Costs,” which amends part of ARB 43, “Inventory Pricing,” concerning the treatment of certain types of inventory costs. The provisions of ARB 43 provided that certain inventory-related costs, such as double freight, re-handling, might be “so abnormal” that they should be charged against current earnings rather than be included in the cost of inventory that is capitalized to future periods. As amended by SFAS No. 151, the “so-abnormal” criterion has been eliminated. Thus, all such “abnormal” costs are required to be treated as current-period charges under all circumstances. In addition, fixed production overhead should be allocated based on the normal capacity of the production facilities, with unallocated overhead charged to expense when incurred. SFAS 151 is required to be adopted for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The impacts of adopting SFAS No.151did not have a material impact on our overall financial position. 
 

 
7. Recent Pronouncements

In July, 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” providing guidance on the accounting for and reporting of corrections accounting changes and error corrections. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The impact of adopting SFAS 154 is not anticipated to have a material impact on our financial position.

In July, 2006, the FASB issued FASB interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN48”), an interpretation of FASB statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, regarding accounting for income tax uncertainties effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 will apply to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109 on Accounting for Income Taxes. The impact of adopting the positions of the interpretation is not anticipated to have a material impact on our overall financial position.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission published Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 (Topic 1N), Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using both the balance sheet and income statement approaches, with adjustment required if either method results in a material error. The provisions of SAB No. 108 are effective for annual financial statements for the fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we are evaluating the effect, if any, SAB No. 108 may have on our financial statements, but management does not currently believe SAB No. 108 will have a material effect upon initial adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements. We will adopt this standard January 1, 2008. We do not expect it to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

8. Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of tangible and identified intangible net assets of the businesses acquired. The Company has $4,206,000 in goodwill on its balance sheet as of September 30, 2006 and $4,135,000 at December 31, 2005. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subjected to an annual impairment test. When events or changes in circumstances indicate that assets may be impaired, an evaluation is performed comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset to the asset’s carrying amount to determine if a write-down to market value or discounted cash flow is required. During the period ending September 30, 2006, no instances or events required any valuation or update.

9. Income Taxes

A full valuation allowance is recorded against the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets as management cannot conclude, based on available objective evidence, when the gross value of its deferred tax assets will be realized. The Company accrues foreign tax expenses or benefits as these are incurred.

10.  
Commitments and Contingencies

On March 6, 2006, Ohms Electric, Inc. filed a complaint against Fiberstars, Inc. with the 30th Judicial Circuit Court in the State of Michigan. The complaint requests unspecified damages as a result of the Company’s product not working properly at Neighborhood Cinema in Lansing, Michigan. Management does not believe the suit will have a material affect on our financial condition and results of operations.
 


11. Reorganization

In June 2005, the Company announced its plans to close its Fremont office and consolidate most of its operations in Solon, Ohio, where the Company already had a local sales office and a manufacturing facility. The relocation was expected to result in a restructuring charge of approximately $3,500,000 for severance payments, redundancy, and lease and inventory write-offs. The Company recognized a $3,120,000 restructuring charge in the year ended December 31, 2005. During the first three quarters of 2006, the Company charged to Operations $734,000 for costs associated with the reorganization.

12. Related Party Transactions

The Company entered into a consulting agreement with Jeffrey H. Brite, a member of its Board of Directors, effective date of November 1, 2004. As a consultant under this agreement, Mr. Brite is to assist Fiberstars, Inc.’s President and Vice President of Sales in identifying, contacting and making introductions to key building project personnel in a position to facilitate the purchase of Fiberstars, Inc. products. In return, Fiberstars, Inc. compensated Mr. Brite with the award of an option for the acquisition of up to 40,000 shares of its common stock at a per share exercise price of $7.23 and with annual aggregate cash payments of $50,000 to be paid in quarterly installments during each of the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. Payments in the third quarter of 2006 to Brite totaled $15,500 and total $46,500 for the nine months ending September 30, 2006. Payments in the third quarter of 2005 totaled $15,000 and for the nine months ending September 30, 2005 totaled $30,000.

Gensler Architecture, Design & Plannning, P.C., a New York Professional Corporation (“Gensler”) provides contract services to the Company in the areas of fixture design and marketing, targeted at expanding the market for the Company’s EFO™ products. Mr. Jeffrey Brite, an employee of Gensler, is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company entered into a three year consulting agreement with Gensler, effective December 15, 2004. Gensler has agreed to assist Fiberstars’ marketing group with matters of structure, procedure and practices as they relate to the design, real estate and procurement communities, and to advise Fiberstars on strategies to enhance its visibility and image within the design and construction community as a manufacturer of preferred technology. In return, Fiberstars compensated Gensler with a one-time cash payment in 2005 of $60,750 for services delivered in advance of the completion of the negotiation of the Consulting Agreement, $50,000 annual cash payments to be paid in quarterly installments of $12,500 in arrears for each of the calendar years 2005, 2006 and 2007, and a one-time option award to acquire up to 75,000 shares of Fiberstars’ common stock at a per share exercise price of $6.57. During the third quarter of 2006, the Company paid Gensler $12,500 and $37,500 for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 compared to $12,500 in the third quarter of 2005 and $25,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2005.

On July 1, 2005, David Ruckert, the Company’s CEO resigned as CEO and served as President and Director through September 30, 2005 after which he served as Director. Mr. Ruckert signed a severance agreement with the Company which was effective July 1, 2005, and which resulted in a payment in 2005 of $332,076 upon his departure as an employee, October 1, 2005. Mr. Ruckert also entered into a consulting agreement with the Company on December 9, 2005. Payments to Mr. Ruckert in the third quarter of 2006 totaled $13,000 and $82,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

On September 19, 2005, the Company entered into a master services agreement and related ancillary agreements with Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc. (“ADLT”). These agreements include development agreements governing the provision of research and development services by ADLT to the Company and by the Company to ADLT, which agreements are subject to pre-determined cost limitations and the ability of either party to terminate these agreements for convenience and with proper notice, and under which the Company expects ADLT to develop new lamps for the Company’s energy efficient lighting system known as EFO™, and ADLT expects the Company to adapt the Company’s patented CPC optic technology to certain ADLT products; an equipment purchase and supply agreement governing the Company’s purchase of manufacturing equipment from ADLT and the supply of support and manufacturing services by ADLT related to the purchased equipment; a mutual supply agreement governing the sale and purchase of the Company’s products by ADLT and of ADLT’s products by the Company; and a cross license agreement governing the mutual grant of rights and licenses between the Company and ADLT for specified uses of intellectual property. These agreements became effective upon ADLT’s sale of certain shares of the Company’s Common Stock on November 8, 2005, as described in a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 2005, in which ADLT participated as a selling shareholder and their shares of the company stock were sold. ADLT has no remaining ownership interest in the Company.
 


Purchases from ADLT, excluding rent, were $165,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and $1,639,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Purchases in 2006 included $1,325,000 in capital equipment and purchases in the third quarter of 2005 and nine months ending September 30, 2005 were $112,000 and $305,000, respectively. Purchases in the fourth quarter of 2005 included $1,092,000 in capital equipment. Sales to ADLT were $3,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and $114,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2006, compared to $80,000 and $121,000 for the third quarter and nine months ending of September 30, 2005. Accounts receivable with ADLT were $55,000 at September 30, 2006 and $132,000 at December 31, 2005. These amounts are included in the accounts receivable trade balance on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Accounts payable were $16,000 at September 30, 2006 and $33,000 at December 31, 2005, respectively. These amounts are included in the accounts payable trade balance on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Further, as a part of our relocation of our base operations from Fremont, California to Solon, Ohio, we expanded our lease with ADLT to rent a portion of their building in Solon, Ohio. During the second quarter of 2006, the lease was assigned to a non-related third party and extended through 2011. There were no lease payments to ADLT in the third quarter of 2006. Lease payments for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 totaled $138,000. Lease payments were $46,000 in the third quarter of 2005 and $98,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2005. This site is now the Company’s Corporate Administrative headquarters, Engineering, and Commercial sales and operations hub.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
When used in this discussion, the words "expects," "anticipates," "estimates," “plan,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements, which include statements as to our expected sales and gross profit margins, expected operating expenses and capital expenditure levels, our sales and marketing expenses, our general and administrative expenses, expected expenses related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the adequacy of capital resources and necessity to raise additional funds, our critical accounting policies, expected restructuring costs related to our consolidation in Solon, Ohio, expected benefits from our consolidation and statements regarding pending litigation are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below, as well as our ability to manage expenses, our ability to reduce manufacturing overhead and general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales, our ability to collect on doubtful accounts receivable, our ability to increase cash balances in future quarters, the cost of enforcing or defending intellectual property, unforeseen adverse competitive, economic or other factors that may impact our cash position, risks associated with raising additional funds, and risks associated with our pending litigation. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net sales decreased 11% to $6,808,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the same quarter a year ago. The decrease was primarily a result of lower pool sales (down 15%) due to the slowdown in housing starts along with lower sales from Europe (down 29%) as a result of a large one-time sale in the third quarter of 2005 which was not duplicated in the third quarter of 2006. These shortfalls were partially offset by higher EFO sales of $1,346,000 in the quarter compared to $454,000 in the third quarter of 2005. Third quarter sales include $850,000 in revenue from the achievement of Navy ship install contract milestones. Net sales for the first nine months of 2006 were $19,845,000 compared to net sales of $22,102,000 for the same period in 2005, a decrease of 10%. The sales decrease in the first nine months is also due to lower traditional fiber optic sales in pool lighting products (down 13%) and Europe (down 15%) partially offset by higher EFO sales, which were $2,547,000 for nine months ending September 30, 2006 compared to $1,220,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2005. Due to lower sales in the traditional fiber optic lines, pool lighting and traditional commercial, we expect overall sales to be down for fiscal 2006. However, the market for our products is highly dependent upon general economic conditions.
 


On March 31, 2006, we announced that we had received funding from DARPA for $2,100,000 to develop and install our high efficiency distributed lighting systems as a “commercial” product on three US Navy ships. This project will result in revenue being recognized on a percentage of completion basis as milestones are completed over the next two years. We recognized revenue of $850,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and $1,399,000 for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 for the completion of milestones.

Gross profit was $2,036,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, a 31% decrease compared to the same period in the prior year. The gross profit margin as a percentage of sales decreased from 39% for the third quarter of fiscal 2005 to 30 % for the third quarter of 2006. Gross profit margin declined primarily due to lower gross profit margins on U.S. pool lighting and commercial lighting sales. Gross profit for the first nine months of 2006 was $5,966,000, a decrease of 29% over gross profit margins for the same period in 2005. This represents gross profit margins of 30% for the first nine months of 2006 compared to 38% in 2005. The decline was due to lower margins on U.S. pool lighting and commercial lighting sales. It was partially offset by higher margins in Europe due to increased margins on several projects. We expect gross profit margins for the full 2006 year, to be lower than 2005, assuming general economic conditions remain consistent.

Research and development expenses were $630,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, a decrease of $9,000 compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Gross expenses for research and development decreased by 34% due to lower project costs and due to engineering costs associated with delivering the Navy ship install milestones being included in cost of sales in the third quarter of 2006, whereas there were no such reclassed expenses in 2005. Our research and development expense are reduced by credits received for achieving milestones under a development contract with the Department of Energy, “DOE” that was signed in 2005 for a total of $1,500,000. In addition, further awards were taken for a Small Business Innovative Research award with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, “DARPA” totaling $199,000 signed in October, 2005. Gross research and development expenses were $2,658,000 in the first 9 months of 2006, compared to $3,149,000 for the same period in 2005. The decrease was a result of lower project costs and engineering costs included in cost of sales for the first nine months of 2006 as discussed above for the quarter. The gross research and development spending along with credits from government contracts is shown in the table:
 
     
Three months ended
September 30, 2006 
   
Nine months ended
September 30, 2006 
 
     
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
     
2006 
   
2005 
   
2006 
   
2005 
 
                           
Gross expenses for research and development
 
$
827
 
$
1,253
 
$
2,658
 
$
3,149
 
 
                         
Deduct: credits from DARPA & DOE contracts
   
(197
)
 
(614
)
 
(1,137
)
 
(1,633
)
Net research and development expense
 
$
630
 
$
639
 
$
1,521
 
$
1,516
 

We expect research and development expense nearly flat for the full year 2006 compared to 2005 due to reduced DARPA credits offset by lower gross expenses as discussed above.

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 13% to $2,280,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to $2,611,000 for the same period in fiscal 2005. The decrease is due to a one time increase in pool sales and marketing expense in the third quarter of 2005 due to expenses associated with the settlement of a lawsuit with Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. There was no such legal expense in 2006. Sales and marketing expense decreased by 3% to $7,132,000 in the first nine months of 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005, for the same reason it decreased for the quarter as described above. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase slightly for the full year 2006 as we anticipate increasing our sales and marketing efforts for our new products.

General and administrative expenses were $1,303,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006, an increase of 70% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due to the impact of expense recognized under FAS123R ($238,000), Sarbanes Oxley ($88,000) and increased bad debt expenses ($175,000). We will be required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by December 31, 2006. Estimates of costs required in order to comply with Section 404 for a company of our size range in the order of $600,000 or higher, independent of additional audit fees of which approximately $350,000 has been recorded through September 30th. These additional expenses will be incurred in the remainder of fiscal year 2006. General and administrative expenses were $3,918,000 for the first nine months of 2006 compared to $2,324,000 for the same period in 2005. The increase is primarily due to option expenses and compliance costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley. We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to anticipated higher administration accounting costs and expenses associated with the impact of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 and option expense under FAS123R.
 

 
In June 2005, we announced our plans to close our Fremont office and consolidate most of our operations in Solon, Ohio, where we have a local sales office and a manufacturing facility. The relocation resulted in a restructuring charge of approximately $3,100,000 for severance payments, redundancy, and lease and inventory write-offs for the fiscal year 2005. During the first nine months of 2006, we charged to operations $734,000 for costs associated with this restructuring. Additional restructuring costs were necessary in 2006 beyond what was originally estimated in order to further consolidate distribution operations into our Mexican production site. Restructuring is now complete and there will be no further costs charged in 2006. We expect the total restructuring to produce cost savings of between $1,500,000 and $2,000,000 on an annual basis, and we have begun to see the impact of this savings in Q3 of 2006. These savings will be reflected largely in reduced cost of sales with a lesser amount in operating expenses. These savings are being offset by expense increases as a result of building capacity and increasing expenses for development, sales and marketing of new products, primarily EFO, and also new pool lighting products.
 
We recorded a net loss of $2,125,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to a net loss of $2,074,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. The net loss for the nine months ending September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $6,866,000 and $3,887,000, respectively. The net loss in 2006 was due primarily to soft sales, reduced margin from changes in product mix, and higher operating expenses.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and cash equivalents

At September 30, 2006, our cash and cash equivalents were $3,319,000 as compared to $5,554,000 at December 31, 2005, a net cash decrease of $2,235,000 during the first nine months of 2006. This compares to a net cash increase of $757,000 for the same period in 2005, and an ending cash balance of $4,366,000 as of September 30, 2005. We also had $14,597,000 in short-term securities at September 30, 2006 as compared to $18,024,000 in short-term securities at December 31, 2005, a decrease of $3,427,000.

Due to seasonality in the sales of our pool lighting products, our cash balances tend to decrease in the first half of the year and increase in the second half of the year. This year we expect there to be some cash utilization in the second half of the year due to increased investment in new products, however at a slower rate than in the first half. This is subject to the condition that the market for our products is highly dependent upon general economic conditions.

Cash was used in the period to purchase fixed assets and pay other accruals from December 31, 2005 relating to costs incurred in 2005 for our restructuring and resolution of legal commitments.

Cash provided by (used in) Investing Activities

Investing activities provided cash of $205,000 during the first nine months of 2006, compared to a use of cash of $532,000 for the same period of 2005. During both periods, cash was used for the acquisition of fixed assets. Fixed asset purchases from ADLT were $1,325,000 in the first nine months of 2006. The increase was due to additional fixed assets required in order to move forward with the EFO product line and future R & D efforts. The sale of short-term securities in 2006 provided cash to fund fixed asset purchases and operations.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Financing activities contributed $3,177,000 to cash during the first nine months of 2006. This net contribution was due primarily from long and short term borrowings of $2,875,000 and the exercise of warrants and employee stock options for $565,000. For the same period in 2005, financing activities, from the exercise of warrants and employee stock options, were $1,530,000. 
 


The Company has a $5,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (Accounts Receivable and Inventory) with Silicon Valley Bank. This agreement is dated August 15, 2005. It was subsequently amended and restated at December 31, 2005. It was further amended September 25, 2006 and extended through August 13, 2007. The interest rate equals prime plus 1.75% per annum computed daily. Borrowings under this Loan and Security Agreement were collateralized by its assets and intellectual property. Specific borrowings were tied to accounts receivable and inventory balances, and the Company is required to comply with certain covenants with respect to effective net worth. The Company had $1,000,000 of borrowings against this facility as of June 30, 2006 and no borrowings at December 31, 2005. The Company had total borrowings of $2,430,000 under the term-loan agreement as of September 30, 2006 and $1,092,000 as of December 31, 2005. The Company was in conformity with the bank covenants of the Silicon Valley Bank agreement as of September 30, 2006.

Through our U.K. subsidiary, we maintain a $468,000 (in UK pounds sterling based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) bank overdraft agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc through its UK subsidiary. There were no borrowings against this facility as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The facility is renewed annually on January 1 and bears an interest rate of 7%.

Through our German subsidiary, we maintain a credit facility under an agreement with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. This credit facility is in place to finance, and is secured by, our offices owned and occupied by our German subsidiary. As of September 30, 2006 we had total borrowings of $375,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at June 30, 2006) against this credit facility. As of December 31, 2005, we had $331,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2005) borrowed against this facility. Additionally, we have a revolving line of credit of $254,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) with Sparkasse Neumarkt Bank. As of September 30, 2006 there were borrowings against this facility of $222,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006), and there were $47,000 of borrowings against this facility as of December 31, 2005 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2005). The facility is renewed annually on January 1 and bears an interest rate of 8.75%.

We believe that our existing cash balances and funds available to us through our bank lines of credit together with funds that we anticipate generating from our operations, will be sufficient to finance our currently anticipated working capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements for the next twelve months.  However, a sudden increase in product demand requiring a significant increase in manufacturing capability, or unforeseen adverse competitive, economic or other factors may impact our cash position, and thereby affect operations.  From time to time we may be required to raise additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements.  There can be no assurance that such funding, if needed, will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.  Furthermore, any additional equity financing may be dilutive to shareholders, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants. Strategic arrangements, if necessary to raise additional funds, may require that we relinquish rights to certain of our technologies or products.  Failure to generate sufficient revenues or to raise capital when needed could have an adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to achieve intended business objectives.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of our financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingencies and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses in the financial statements. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of revenue and expenses if different judgments or different estimates were utilized. Critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates which we believe have the most significant impact on our financial statements include allowances for doubtful accounts, returns, warranties, valuation of inventories, and stock based compensation. For the detailed discussion of the application of policies critical to our business operations, see our Annual Report Form on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

RECENTLY ADOPTED STANDARDS

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) as SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payments.” SFAS 123R requires all entities to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, such as stock options granted to employees. We applied SFAS 123R on a modified prospective method beginning in 2006. Under this method, we have recorded compensation expense (as previous awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at January 1, 2006.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.151, “Inventory Costs,” which amends part of ARB 43, “Inventory Pricing,” concerning the treatment of certain types of inventory costs. The provisions of ARB 43 provided that certain inventory-related costs, such as double freight, re-handling, might be “so abnormal” that they should be charged against current earnings rather than be included in the cost of inventory that is capitalized to future periods. As amended by SFAS No. 151, the “so-abnormal” criterion has been eliminated. Thus, all such “abnormal” costs are required to be treated as current-period charges under all circumstances. In addition, fixed production overhead should be allocated based on the normal capacity of the production facilities, with unallocated overhead charged to expense when incurred. SFAS 151 is required to be adopted for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The impacts of adopting SFAS No.151did not have a material impact on our overall financial position.
 

 
RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July, 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” providing guidance on the accounting for and reporting of corrections accounting changes and error corrections. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The impact of adopting SFAS 154 is not anticipated to have a material impact on our financial position.

In July, 2006, the FASB issued FASB interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN48”), an interpretation of FASB statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, regarding accounting for income tax uncertainties effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN 48 will apply to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS 109 on Accounting for Income Taxes. The impact of adopting the positions of the interpretation is not anticipated to have a material impact on our overall financial position.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission published Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 (Topic 1N), Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using both the balance sheet and income statement approaches, with adjustment required if either method results in a material error. The provisions of SAB No. 108 are effective for annual financial statements for the fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, we are evaluating the effect, if any, SAB No. 108 may have on our financial statements, but management does not currently believe SAB No. 108 will have a material effect upon initial adoption.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements. We will adopt this standard January 1, 2008. We do not expect it to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As of September 30, 2006, we had $606,000 in cash held in foreign currencies based on the exchange rates at September 30, 2006. The balances for cash held overseas in foreign currencies are subject to exchange rate risk. We have a policy of maintaining cash balances in local currencies unless an amount of cash is occasionally transferred in order to repay inter-company debts.

As of September 30, 2006 we had borrowings of $222,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2006) against a credit facility secured by real property owned by our German subsidiary. As of December 31, 2005, we had $47,000 (in Euros, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2005) borrowed against this credit facility.
 


Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
 
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet, and management believes they meet, reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
 
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.
 
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
 
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On March 6, 2006, Ohms Electric, Inc. filed a complaint against Fiberstars, Inc. with the 30th Judicial Circuit Court in the State of Michigan. The complaint requests unspecified damages as a result of the Company’s product not working properly at Neighborhood Cinema in Lansing, Michigan. Management does not believe the suit will have a material affect on our financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no significant changes in risk factors from our Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.



 
Item 6. Exhibits  
 
Exhibit
Number
   
Description of Documents
     
 10.1
 
Amendment No. 1 To Amended And Restated Loan And Security Agreement between Fiberstars, Inc and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 25, 2006
 31.1
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1**
 
Statement of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
32.2**
 
Statement of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
 

** In accordance with item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
FIBERSTARS, INC.
       
Date: November 14, 2006
 
By:
/s/ John M. Davenport
 
     
John M. Davenport
 
     
Chief Executive Officer
 
       
       
   
By:
/s/ Robert A. Connors
 
     
Robert A. Connors
 
     
Chief Financial Officer
 
     
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)









Exhibit Index
 
Exhibit
Number
   
Description of Documents
     
 10.1
 
Amendment No. 1 To Amended And Restated Loan And Security Agreement between Fiberstars, Inc and Silicon Valley Bank dated September 25, 2006
 31.1
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1**
 
Statement of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
32.2**
 
Statement of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. §1350).
 

** In accordance with item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.