ENTERGY ARKANSAS, LLC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
|
X
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
OR
|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For
the transition period from ____________ to
____________
|
Commission
File
Number
|
Registrant,
State of Incorporation or Organization,
Address
of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone
Number,
and IRS Employer Identification No.
|
Commission
File
Number
|
Registrant,
State of Incorporation or Organization,
Address
of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone
Number,
and IRS Employer Identification No.
|
|
1-11299
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION
(a
Delaware corporation)
639
Loyola Avenue
New
Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone
(504) 576-4000
72-1229752
|
1-31508
|
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
(a
Mississippi corporation)
308
East Pearl Street
Jackson,
Mississippi 39201
Telephone
(601) 368-5000
64-0205830
|
|
1-10764
|
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
(an
Arkansas corporation)
425
West Capitol Avenue
Little
Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone
(501) 377-4000
71-0005900
|
0-05807
|
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
(a
Louisiana corporation)
1600
Perdido Street
New
Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone
(504) 670-3700
72-0273040
|
|
0-20371
|
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
(a
Louisiana limited liability company)
446
North Boulevard
Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70802
Telephone
(800) 368-3749
74-0662730
|
1-34360
|
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC.
(a
Texas corporation)
350
Pine Street
Beaumont,
Texas 77701
Telephone
(409) 838-6631
61-1435798
|
|
1-32718
|
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
(a
Texas limited liability company)
446
North Boulevard
Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70802
Telephone
(800) 368-3749
75-3206126
|
1-09067
|
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an
Arkansas corporation)
Echelon
One
1340
Echelon Parkway
Jackson,
Mississippi 39213
Telephone
(601) 368-5000
72-0752777
|
|
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such
reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrants have submitted electronically and posted on Entergy's corporate Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were
required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large
accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule
12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large
accelerated
filer
|
Accelerated
filer
|
Non-
accelerated
filer
|
Smaller
reporting
company
|
|||||
Entergy
Corporation
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
|
Ö
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Common Stock Outstanding
|
Outstanding at July 31,
2009
|
|
Entergy
Corporation
|
($0.01
par value)
|
195,792,216
|
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas,
Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy
Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc. and System
Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. Information contained herein relating to any individual company
is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company reports
herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any
other company. This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year
ended December 31, 2008 and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, filed by the individual registrants with the SEC, and
should be read in conjunction therewith.
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June
30, 2009
Page Number
|
|
Definitions
|
1
|
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Plan to Pursue Separation of
Non-Utility Nuclear
|
3
|
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike
|
4
|
Entergy Arkansas January 2009
Ice Storm
|
5
|
Results of
Operations
|
5
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
13
|
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other
Regulation
|
17
|
Market and Credit Risk
Sensitive Instruments
|
20
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
21
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
22
|
Consolidated Statements of
Income
|
23
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
24
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
26
|
Consolidated Statements of
Retained Earnings, Comprehensive Income, and
Paid-In
Capital
|
28
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
30
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
31
|
Part
1. Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
67
|
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
68
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
71
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
73
|
Federal
Regulation
|
74
|
Utility
Restructuring
|
74
|
Nuclear Matters
|
74
|
Environmental
Risks
|
74
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
75
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
75
|
Income
Statements
|
76
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
77
|
Balance Sheets
|
78
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
80
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike
|
81
|
Results of
Operations
|
81
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
85
|
Jurisdictional Separation of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and
Entergy Texas
|
87
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
88
|
Federal
Regulation
|
88
|
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
|
88
|
Nuclear Matters
|
88
|
Environmental
Risks
|
88
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
88
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
89
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June
30, 2009
Page Number
|
|
Income
Statements
|
90
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
91
|
Balance Sheets
|
92
|
Statements of Members' Equity
and Comprehensive Income
|
94
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
95
|
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike
|
96
|
Results of
Operations
|
96
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
99
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
101
|
Federal
Regulation
|
102
|
Utility
Restructuring
|
102
|
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
|
102
|
Nuclear Matters
|
102
|
Environmental
Risks
|
102
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
102
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
103
|
Income
Statements
|
104
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
105
|
Balance Sheets
|
106
|
Statements of Members' Equity
and Comprehensive Income
|
108
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
109
|
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
110
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
113
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
114
|
Federal
Regulation
|
115
|
Utility
Restructuring
|
115
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
115
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
115
|
Income
Statements
|
116
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
117
|
Balance Sheets
|
118
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
120
|
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
121
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
123
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
124
|
Federal
Regulation
|
125
|
Environmental
Risks
|
125
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
125
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
126
|
Income
Statements
|
127
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
129
|
Balance Sheets
|
130
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
132
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
June
30, 2009
Page Number
|
|
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Hurricane Ike and Hurricane
Gustav
|
133
|
Results of
Operations
|
133
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
136
|
Transition to Retail
Competition in Texas
|
138
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
139
|
Federal
Regulation
|
140
|
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
|
140
|
Environmental
Risks
|
140
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
140
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
140
|
Consolidated Income
Statements
|
141
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
143
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
144
|
Consolidated Statements of
Retained Earnings and Paid-In Capital
|
146
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
147
|
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
148
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
148
|
Nuclear Matters
|
149
|
Environmental
Risks
|
149
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
150
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
150
|
Income
Statements
|
151
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
153
|
Balance Sheets
|
154
|
Part
II. Other Information
|
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
156
|
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
|
156
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use
of Proceeds
|
156
|
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
157
|
Item
5. Other Information
|
158
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
161
|
Signature
|
164
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
In this
combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant
Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations,
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or
performance. Such statements are "forward-looking statements" within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Words such as "may," "will," "could," "project," "believe,"
"anticipate," "intend," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "potential," "plan,"
"predict," "forecast," and other similar words or expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these
statements. Although each of these registrants believes that these
forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it
cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct. Any
forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this
combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is
made. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws,
these registrants undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise.
Forward-looking
statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There are
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including those factors
discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form
10-K, (b) Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in
this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described
elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities
filings):
·
|
resolution
of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including various
performance-based rate discussions and implementation of legislation
ending the Texas transition to competition, and other regulatory
proceedings, including those related to Entergy's System Agreement,
Entergy's utility supply plan, recovery of storm costs, and recovery of
fuel and purchased power costs
|
·
|
changes
in utility regulation, including the beginning or end of retail and
wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other
potential stranded costs, the operations of the independent coordinator of
transmission for Entergy's utility service territory, and the application
of more stringent transmission reliability requirements or market power
criteria by the FERC
|
·
|
changes
in regulation of nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and
fuel, including possible shutdown of nuclear generating facilities,
particularly those owned or operated by the Non-Utility Nuclear
business
|
·
|
resolution
of pending or future applications for license renewals or modifications of
nuclear generating facilities
|
·
|
the
performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy's generating
plants, including the capacity factors at its nuclear generating
facilities
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices
of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related
commodities
|
·
|
prices
for power generated by Entergy's merchant generating facilities, the
ability to hedge, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price
risk associated with those facilities, including the Non-Utility Nuclear
plants, and the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must
purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy's ability to meet credit
support requirements for fuel and power supply
contracts
|
·
|
volatility
and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, and other
energy-related commodities
|
·
|
changes
in law resulting from federal or state energy
legislation
|
·
|
changes
in environmental, tax, and other laws, including requirements for reduced
emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, carbon, mercury, and other
substances
|
·
|
uncertainty
regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent
nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and
disposal
|
·
|
variations
in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and
disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate
the effects of hurricanes and ice storms (including most recently,
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike and the January 2009 ice storm in
Arkansas) and recovery of costs associated with restoration, including
accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery
mechanisms, securitization, and
insurance
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to manage its capital projects and operation and maintenance
costs
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other
attractive terms
|
·
|
the
economic climate, and particularly growth in Entergy's Utility service
territory and the Northeast United
States
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION (Concluded)
·
|
the
effects of Entergy's strategies to reduce tax
payments
|
·
|
changes
in the financial markets, particularly those affecting the availability of
capital and Entergy's ability to refinance existing debt, execute its
share repurchase program, and fund investments and
acquisitions
|
·
|
actions
of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt and preferred
stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating
agencies' ratings criteria
|
·
|
changes
in inflation and interest rates
|
·
|
the
effect of litigation and government investigations or
proceedings
|
·
|
advances
in technology
|
·
|
the
potential effects of threatened or actual terrorism and
war
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to attract and retain talented management and
directors
|
·
|
changes
in accounting standards and corporate
governance
|
·
|
declines
in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding
requirements for Entergy's defined benefit pension and other
postretirement benefit plans
|
·
|
changes
in the results of decommissioning trust fund earnings or in the timing of
or cost to decommission nuclear plant
sites
|
·
|
the
ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition, or divestiture
plans, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of merger,
acquisition, or divestiture, and the success of the business following a
merger, acquisition, or divestiture
|
·
|
and
the risks inherent in the contemplated Non-Utility Nuclear spin-off, joint
venture, and related transactions. Entergy Corporation cannot
provide any assurances that the spin-off or any of the proposed
transactions related thereto will be completed, nor can it give assurances
as to the terms on which such transactions will be
consummated. The transaction is subject to certain conditions
precedent, including regulatory approvals and the final approval by the
Board.
|
DEFINITIONS
Certain abbreviations or acronyms used
in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym
|
Term
|
AEEC
|
Arkansas
Electric Energy Consumers
|
AFUDC
|
Allowance
for Funds Used During Construction
|
ALJ
|
Administrative
Law Judge
|
ANO
1 and 2
|
Units
1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One Steam Electric Generating Station
(nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
|
APSC
|
Arkansas
Public Service Commission
|
Board
|
Board
of Directors of Entergy Corporation
|
capacity
factor
|
Actual
plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the
period
|
City
Council or Council
|
Council
of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
|
Entergy
Corporation
|
Entergy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation
|
Entergy
Gulf States, Inc.
|
Predecessor
company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a company created in connection with the
jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor
company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting
purposes. The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana
jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context
requires.
|
Entergy-Koch
|
Entergy-Koch,
LP, a joint venture equally owned by subsidiaries of Entergy and Koch
Industries, Inc.
|
Entergy
Texas
|
Entergy
Texas, Inc., a company created in connection with the jurisdictional
separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. The term is also used
to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States,
Inc., as the context requires.
|
EPA
|
United
States Environmental Protection Agency
|
ERCOT
|
Electric
Reliability Council of Texas
|
FASB
|
Financial
Accounting Standards Board
|
FERC
|
Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
|
firm
liquidated damages
|
Transaction
that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point
(usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset); if a party
fails to deliver or receive energy, the defaulting party must compensate
the other party as specified in the contract
|
Form
10-K
|
Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 filed by
Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries with the
SEC
|
FSP
|
FASB
Staff Position
|
Grand
Gulf
|
Unit
No. 1 of Grand Gulf Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), 90% owned
or leased by System Energy
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt-hour(s),
which equals one million kilowatt-hours
|
Independence
|
Independence
Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by
Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power
|
IRS
|
Internal
Revenue Service
|
ISO
|
Independent
System Operator
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt-hour(s)
|
LPSC
|
Louisiana
Public Service Commission
|
MMBtu
|
One
million British Thermal Units
|
1
DEFINITIONS
(Continued)
MPSC
|
Mississippi
Public Service Commission
|
MW
|
Megawatt(s),
which equals one thousand kilowatt(s)
|
MWh
|
Megawatt-hour(s)
|
Net
debt ratio
|
Gross
debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less
cash and cash equivalents
|
Net
MW in operation
|
Installed
capacity owned or operated
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
Entergy's
business segment that owns and operates six nuclear power plants and sells
electric power produced by those plants to wholesale
customers
|
NRC
|
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission
|
NYPA
|
New
York Power Authority
|
PPA
|
Purchased
power agreement
|
production
cost
|
Cost
in $/MMBtu associated with delivering gas, excluding the cost of the
gas
|
PUCT
|
Public
Utility Commission of Texas
|
PUHCA
1935
|
Public
Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended
|
PUHCA
2005
|
Public
Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, which repealed PUHCA 1935, among
other things
|
Registrant
Subsidiaries
|
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana,
LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas,
Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
|
River
Bend
|
River
Bend Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana
|
SEC
|
Securities
and Exchange Commission
|
SFAS
|
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards as promulgated by the
FASB
|
System
Agreement
|
Agreement,
effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating
companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power
resources
|
System
Energy
|
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
|
TIEC
|
Texas
Industrial Energy Consumers
|
TWh
|
Terawatt-hour(s),
which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
|
unit-contingent
|
Transaction
under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the
asset is not operating the seller is generally not liable to the buyer for
any damages
|
Unit
Power Sales Agreement
|
Agreement,
dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and
System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System
Energy's share of Grand Gulf
|
Utility
|
Entergy's
business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells
electric power, with a small amount of natural gas
distribution
|
Utility
operating companies
|
Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy
Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
|
Waterford
3
|
Unit
No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station, 100%
owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
|
weather-adjusted
usage
|
Electric
usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal
weather
|
2
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Entergy operates primarily through two
business segments: Utility and Non-Utility Nuclear.
·
|
Utility generates,
transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in a four-state service
territory that includes portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and
Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operates a small natural
gas distribution business.
|
·
|
Non-Utility Nuclear owns
and operates six nuclear power plants located in the northern United
States and sells the electric power produced by those plants primarily to
wholesale customers. This business also provides services to
other nuclear power plant owners.
|
In
addition to its two primary, reportable, operating segments, Entergy also
operates the non-nuclear wholesale assets business. The non-nuclear
wholesale assets business sells to wholesale customers the electric power
produced by power plants that it owns while it focuses on improving performance
and exploring sales or restructuring opportunities for its power
plants. Such opportunities are evaluated consistent with Entergy's
market-based point-of-view.
Plan to Pursue Separation of
Non-Utility Nuclear
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the Board-approved plan to pursue a separation of the Non-Utility Nuclear
business from Entergy through a tax-free spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear
business to Entergy shareholders. Following are updates to that
discussion.
On July 13, 2009, Entergy Corporation,
Entergy Nuclear FitzPatrick, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Entergy
Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., and Enexus filed
a motion with the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC) in connection with
the planned separation requesting procedures and a schedule to enable the report
of the presiding ALJs to be issued in time for the NYPSC to issue a final order
no later than its regularly scheduled meeting in November 2009 so that the
proposed reorganization can be completed by the end of 2009. In
December 2008, notice was provided to the NYPSC that the parties intended to
conduct settlement discussions. The discussions did not produce an
agreement and have ended. Nevertheless, Entergy endeavored to address
and resolve the concerns of the trial staff of the NYPSC related to the
financial strength of Enexus and has developed further enhancements to the
reorganization proposal that it believes should resolve these
concerns. Accordingly, in its motion Entergy proposes to file an
amended petition reflecting these enhancements for the NYPSC's
consideration. In addition, in its motion Entergy sought to ensure
that the scope of review by the NYPSC would remain confined to the three issues
(i.e., operating capability, financial capability, and decommissioning funding)
previously set forth by the NYPSC and further defined by the ALJs.
Enexus intends to file a petition in
August 2009 with the NYPSC addressing amendments to the reorganization proposal
to further enhance Enexus' financial strength and flexibility,
including:
·
|
A
$1.0 billion reduction in long-term bonds to $3.5
billion;
|
·
|
A
commitment to reserve at least $350 million of
liquidity;
|
·
|
An
increase in the initial cash balance left at Enexus to $750 million from
the original $250 million; and
|
·
|
A
revised reorganization plan to transfer 19.9 percent of the Enexus shares
to a trust, to be exchanged for Entergy shares on a tax-free basis shares
within a fixed period of time after the spin-off; this exchange is
commonly referred to in tax-free reorganizations as a split-off and
facilitates the enhancements listed
above.
|
3
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Once the
spin-off transaction is complete, Entergy Corporation's shareholders will own
100 percent of the common equity of Entergy and receive a distribution of 80.1
percent of Enexus' common equity. Entergy will transfer the remaining
Enexus common equity to a trust. While held by the trust, the Enexus
common equity will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the other
Enexus shares on any matter submitted to a vote of the Enexus
shareholders. Within a fixed period of time after the spin-off,
Entergy is expected to exchange the Enexus shares retained in the trust for
Entergy shares. Enexus shares not ultimately exchanged, if any, will
be distributed to Entergy shareholders.
Five parties replied to the motion,
generally in opposition to it. The ALJs issued a ruling on the motion
on July 29, 2009. The ALJs declined to adopt a specific schedule and
process, pending receipt of the amended petition and a reasonable opportunity
for other interested parties to respond shortly thereafter. The ALJs
stated that they were inclined to adopt a process with procedural milestones
that mirror those previously employed in the proceeding, including but not
limited to a reasonable opportunity for some follow-up discovery. The
ALJs stated that they remain open to the possibility that evidentiary hearings
might be held as a matter of discretion; however, nothing presented in the
responses to the motion persuaded them that evidentiary hearings are inherently
necessary. The ALJs declined to rule until after the amended petition
is filed on whether the list of issues in their previous ruling should be
expanded or modified.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., the
current NRC-licensed operator of the Non-Utility Nuclear plants, filed an
application in July 2007 with the NRC seeking indirect transfer of control of
the operating licenses for the six Non-Utility Nuclear power plants, and
supplemented that application in December 2007 to incorporate the planned
business separation. The NRC approved Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc.'s application on July 28, 2008, with the approval effective for a period of
one year. In May 2009, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. filed a
request for extension of the approval for six months, through January 28, 2010,
and the NRC approved the extension on July 24, 2009.
Pursuant to Federal Power Act Section
203, on February 21, 2008, an application was filed with the FERC requesting
approval for the indirect disposition and transfer of control of jurisdictional
facilities of a public utility. The FERC approved the application on June 12,
2008. Entergy expects to file an amended application with the
FERC to reflect the transfer to the trust of the 19.9 percent of Enexus
shares. The FERC will review the amended application to confirm that
the transaction, as described in the amended application, will have no adverse
effects on competition, rates and regulation. Also, the FERC will
seek to confirm that the transaction will still not result in
cross-subsidization by a regulated utility or the pledge or encumbrance of
utility assets for the benefit of a non-utility associate company.
Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to portions
of Entergy's service territories in Louisiana and Texas, and to a lesser extent
in Arkansas and Mississippi, in September 2008. Entergy is still
considering its options to recover its storm restoration costs associated with
these storms, including securitization. In April 2009 a law was
enacted in Texas that authorizes recovery of these types of costs by
securitization. Entergy Texas filed its storm cost recovery case with
the PUCT in April 2009 seeking a determination that $577.5 million of Hurricane
Ike and Hurricane Gustav restoration costs are recoverable, including estimated
costs for work to be completed. On August 5, 2009, Entergy Texas
submitted to the ALJ an unopposed settlement agreement that will, if
approved, resolve all issues in the storm cost recovery
case. Under the terms of the agreement $566.4 million, plus carrying
costs, are eligible for recovery. In addition, $70 million in
anticipated insurance proceeds will be credited as an offset to the securitized
amount, subject to true-up based on actual proceeds received. The
PUCT is expected to consider the agreement at its August 13, 2009,
meeting. On July 16, 2009, Entergy Texas also made its financing request
filing seeking approval to recover its approved costs, plus carrying costs, by
securitization. A prehearing conference was held on August 4, 2009,
and the ALJ ordered a procedural schedule that includes a September 25, 2009,
hearing date.
4
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their storm cost recovery case with
the LPSC in May 2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a
determination that $150.7 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $90
million. Entergy Louisiana seeks a determination that $261.9 million
of storm restoration costs are recoverable and seeks to replenish its storm
reserve in the amount of $200 million. The storm restoration costs
are net of costs that have already been paid from previously funded storm
reserves. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana expect
to make a supplemental filing in the third quarter 2009 to, among other things,
recommend a recovery method for costs approved by the LPSC. The
parties have agreed to a procedural schedule that includes March 2010 hearing
dates for both the recoverability and the method of recovery
proceedings. Recovery options include traditional base rate recovery,
Louisiana Act 64 (passed in 2006) financing, or Louisiana Act 55 (passed in
2007) financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing.
Entergy Arkansas January
2009 Ice Storm
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the severe ice storm that caused significant damage to Entergy Arkansas'
transmission and distribution lines, equipment, poles, and other facilities in
January 2009. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a
discussion of Entergy Arkansas' accounting for and recovery of these storm
costs.
Results of
Operations
Second
Quarter 2009 Compared to Second Quarter 2008
Following are income statement
variances for Utility, Non-Utility Nuclear, Parent & Other, and Entergy
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008 showing how much
the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior
period:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
Parent
&
Other (1) |
Entergy
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
2nd
Qtr 2008 Consolidated Net Income
|
$164,023
|
$143,616
|
($31,710)
|
$275,929
|
||||
Net
revenue (operating revenue less fuel
expense,
purchased power, and other
regulatory
charges/credits)
|
(17,099)
|
(61,346)
|
(13,076)
|
(91,521)
|
||||
Other
operation and maintenance expenses
|
4,281
|
2,969
|
(21,214)
|
(13,964)
|
||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
(5,744)
|
1,935
|
268
|
(3,541)
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,488
|
4,315
|
(91)
|
12,712
|
||||
Other
income
|
21,196
|
(36,353)
|
(26,554)
|
(41,711)
|
||||
Interest
charges
|
14,185
|
601
|
(13,621)
|
1,165
|
||||
Other
expenses
|
3,056
|
3,829
|
-
|
6,885
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
(7,721)
|
(47,943)
|
(36,707)
|
(92,371)
|
||||
2nd
Qtr 2009 Consolidated Net Income
|
$151,575
|
$80,211
|
$25
|
$231,811
|
(1)
|
Parent
& Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment
activity.
|
Refer to "ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
- SELECTED OPERATING
RESULTS" for further information with respect to operating
statistics.
5
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Net
Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter
2008.
|
Amount
|
|||
|
(In
Millions)
|
|||
2008
net revenue
|
$ | 1,182 | ||
Rough
production cost equalization
|
(19 | ) | ||
Retail
electric price
|
(4 | ) | ||
Volume/weather
|
5 | |||
Other
|
1 | |||
2009
net revenue
|
$ | 1,165 |
As discussed further in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the rough production cost equalization variance is due to
an additional $18.6 million allocation of 2007 rough production cost
equalization receipts ordered by the PUCT to Texas retail customers over what
was originally allocated to Entergy Texas prior to the jurisdictional separation
of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas, effective December 2007.
The retail electric price decrease is
primarily due to:
·
|
the
absence of interim storm recoveries through the formula rate plans at
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, which ceased upon the
Act 55 financing of storm costs in the third quarter 2008;
and
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financings.
|
The
retail electric price decrease was partially offset by:
·
|
rate
increases that were implemented in January 2009 at Entergy Texas;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in the Attala power plant costs recovered through the power
management rider by Entergy Mississippi. The net income effect
of this recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on
equity with the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other
operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other
than income taxes.
|
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage during the unbilled sales period, partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather compared to the same period in 2008. Electricity usage by industrial customers decreased by 10%. The weak economy affected customer usage across all customer segments, most notably in the industrial sector. Industrial sales in the second quarter 2009 for large customers were affected by weaknesses in chemicals, primary metals, and refining. Small and mid-sized industrial customers also continue to be negatively affected by overseas competition. The effect of the industrial sales volume decrease is mitigated, however, by the fixed charge basis of many industrial customers' rates, which causes average price per KWh sold to increase as the fixed charges are spread over lower volume.
6
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter
2008.
|
Amount
|
|||
|
(In
Millions)
|
|||
2008
net revenue
|
$ | 553 | ||
Volume
variance
|
(62 | ) | ||
Other
|
1 | |||
2009
net revenue
|
$ | 492 |
As shown
in the table above, net revenue for Non-Utility Nuclear decreased by $61
million, or 11%, in the second quarter 2009 compared to the second quarter 2008
primarily due to lower volume resulting from more refueling outage days as well
as two unplanned outages in 2009. Included in net revenue is $13
million and $19 million of amortization of the Palisades purchased power
agreement in the second quarter 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is non-cash
revenue and is discussed in Note 15 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K. Following are key performance measures for Non-Utility Nuclear
for the second quarter 2009 and 2008:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Net
MW in operation at June 30
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
||
Average
realized price per MWh
|
$59.22
|
$58.22
|
||
GWh
billed
|
8,980
|
10,145
|
||
Capacity
factor
|
81%
|
92%
|
||
Refueling
Outage Days:
|
||||
Indian Point 2
|
-
|
19
|
||
Indian Point 3
|
15
|
-
|
||
Palisades
|
32
|
-
|
||
Pilgrim
|
31
|
-
|
Realized
Price per MWh
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
factors that have influenced Non-Utility Nuclear's realized price per
MWh. Non-Utility Nuclear's annual average realized price per MWh
increased from $39.40 for 2003 to $59.51 for 2008. In addition, as
shown in the contracted sale of energy table in "Market
and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments," Non-Utility Nuclear has sold
forward 87% of its planned energy output for the remainder of 2009 for an
average contracted energy price of $62 per MWh. Recent trends in the
energy commodity markets have resulted in lower natural gas prices and therefore
current prevailing market prices for electricity in the New York and New England
power regions are generally below the prices in Non-Utility Nuclear's existing
contracts in those regions. Power prices on Non-Utility Nuclear's
open energy position declined significantly during the second quarter 2009,
averaging in the low-$30/MWh range. Current market conditions as
reflected in published power prices suggest pricing around the mid-$30/MWh range
for the remainder of 2009. Therefore, it is uncertain whether
Non-Utility Nuclear will continue to experience increases in its annual realized
price per MWh.
7
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other Income Statement
Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $479 million for the second quarter 2008 to
$483 million for the second quarter 2009 primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $8 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
|
·
|
a
reimbursement of $7 million of costs in 2008 in connection with
a litigation settlement; and
|
·
|
an
increase of $5 million in customer service costs primarily as a result of
write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
|
These
increases were substantially offset by a decrease of $11 million in
payroll-related and benefits costs.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an
increase in plant in service.
Other income increased primarily due
to:
·
|
carrying
charges of $19 million on Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs as
authorized by Texas legislation in the second quarter
2009;
|
·
|
distributions
of $14 million earned by Entergy Louisiana and $5 million earned by
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana on investments in preferred membership
interests of Entergy Holdings Company. The distributions on
preferred membership interests are eliminated in consolidation and have no
effect on net income because the investment is in another Entergy
subsidiary. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources - Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita – Storm Cost
Financings" in the Form 10-K for discussion of these investments in
preferred membership interests; and
|
·
|
an
increase of $7 million in allowance for equity funds used during
construction due to more construction work in progress primarily as a
result of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike.
|
This
increase was partially offset by a decrease of $8 million in taxes collected on
advances for transmission projects and a decrease of $5 million resulting from
lower interest earned on the decommissioning trust funds and short-term
investments.
Interest
charges increased primarily due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding
resulting from net debt issuances by certain of the Utility operating companies
in the second half of 2008 and the first half of 2009.
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $201 million for the second quarter 2008 to $204 million
for the second quarter 2009 primarily due to $16 million in outside service
costs and incremental labor costs related to the planned spin-off of the
Non-Utility Nuclear business, substantially offset by lower spending on other
operation and maintenance expenses resulting from more refueling outage
days.
Other income decreased primarily due to
$69 million in charges in the second quarter 2009 compared to $24 million in
charges in the second quarter 2008 resulting from the recognition of impairments
of certain equity securities held in Non-Utility Nuclear's decommissioning trust
funds that are not considered temporary.
Parent
& Other
Other operation and maintenance
expenses decreased for the parent company, Entergy Corporation, primarily due to
a decrease of $23 million in outside services costs related to the planned
spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear business.
8
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other income decreased primarily due to
the elimination for consolidation purposes of distributions earned of
$14 million by Entergy Louisiana and $5 million by Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana on investments in preferred membership interests of Entergy Holdings
Company, as discussed above.
Interest charges decreased primarily
due to lower interest rates on borrowings under Entergy Corporation's revolving
credit facility.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the
second quarters of 2009 and 2008 were 28.1% and 39.9%,
respectively. The reduction in the effective income tax rate versus
the statutory rate of 35% for the second quarter 2009 is primarily due
to:
·
|
an
adjustment to state income taxes for Non-Utility Nuclear to reflect the
effect of a change in the methodology of computing Massachusetts state
income taxes as required by that state's taxing
authority;
|
·
|
the
recognition of state loss carryovers that had been subject to a valuation
allowance; and
|
·
|
the
recognition of a federal capital loss carryover that had been subject to a
valuation allowance.
|
The
reduction was partially offset by state income taxes at the Utility operating
companies.
The difference in the effective income
tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the second quarter 2008 is
primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences for utility
plant items.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2008
Following are income statement
variances for Utility, Non-Utility Nuclear, Parent & Other, and Entergy
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2008 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to
the prior period:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
Parent
&
Other (1) |
Entergy
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
2008
Consolidated Net Income
|
$285,503
|
$365,314
|
($61,141)
|
$589,676
|
||||
Net
revenue (operating revenue less fuel
expense,
purchased power, and other
regulatory
charges/credits)
|
(14,624)
|
(83,665)
|
(12,201)
|
(110,490)
|
||||
Other
operation and maintenance expenses
|
6,510
|
21,353
|
(8,051)
|
19,812
|
||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
13,349
|
8,014
|
922
|
22,285
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
18,117
|
7,281
|
181
|
25,579
|
||||
Other
income
|
46,384
|
(49,276)
|
(55,602)
|
(58,494)
|
||||
Interest
charges
|
19,723
|
840
|
(32,515)
|
(11,952)
|
||||
Other
expenses
|
10,521
|
4,632
|
-
|
15,153
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
(18,501)
|
(70,839)
|
(32,989)
|
(122,329)
|
||||
2009
Consolidated Net Income
|
$267,544
|
$261,092
|
($56,492)
|
$472,144
|
(1)
|
Parent
& Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment
activity.
|
Refer to "ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
- SELECTED OPERATING
RESULTS" for further information with respect to operating
statistics.
9
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Net
Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
|
Amount
|
|||
|
(In
Millions)
|
|||
2008
net revenue
|
$ | 2,216 | ||
Rough
production cost equalization
|
(19 | ) | ||
Volume/weather
|
(3 | ) | ||
Retail
electric price
|
3 | |||
Other
|
5 | |||
2009
net revenue
|
$ | 2,202 |
As discussed further in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the rough production cost equalization variance is due to
an additional $18.6 million allocation of 2007 rough production cost
equalization receipts ordered by the PUCT to Texas retail customers over what
was originally allocated to Entergy Texas prior to the jurisdictional separation
of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas, effective December 2007.
The retail electric price increase is
primarily due to:
·
|
a
capacity acquisition rider that became effective in February 2008 at
Entergy Arkansas;
|
·
|
rate
increases that were implemented in January 2009 at Entergy Texas;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in the Attala power plant costs recovered through the power
management rider by Entergy Mississippi. The net income effect
of this recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on
equity with the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other
operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other
than income taxes.
|
The retail electric price increase was largely offset by:
·
|
the
absence of interim storm recoveries through the formula rate plans at
Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, which ceased upon the
Act 55 financing of storm costs in third quarter 2008;
and
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financings.
|
The
volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased electricity usage of 11%
by industrial customers. The overall decline of the economy led to
lower usage affecting both the large customer industrial segment as well as
small and mid-sized industrial customers, who are also being affected by
overseas competition. The effect of the industrial sales volume
decrease is mitigated, however, by the fixed charge basis of many industrial
customers' rates, which causes average price per KWh sold to increase as the
fixed charges are spread over lower volume. Also contributing to the
decrease is less favorable weather compared to the same period in
2008. These decreases were substantially offset by increased
electricity usage during the unbilled sales period.
10
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
|
Amount
|
|||
|
(In
Millions)
|
|||
2008
net revenue
|
$ | 1,178 | ||
Volume
variance
|
(100 | ) | ||
Realized
price changes
|
20 | |||
Other
|
(3 | ) | ||
2009
net revenue
|
$ | 1,095 |
As shown in the table above, net
revenue for Non-Utility Nuclear decreased by $83 million, or 7%, in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008
primarily due to lower volume resulting from more refueling outage days,
partially offset by higher pricing in its contracts to sell
power. Included in net revenue is $26 million and $38 million of
amortization of the Palisades purchased power agreement in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is non-cash revenue and is discussed
in Note 15 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Following
are key performance measures for Non-Utility Nuclear for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Net
MW in operation at June 30
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
||
Average
realized price per MWh
|
$61.66
|
$59.89
|
||
GWh
billed
|
19,054
|
20,905
|
||
Capacity
factor
|
87%
|
95%
|
||
Refueling
Outage Days:
|
||||
Indian Point 2
|
-
|
26
|
||
Indian Point 3
|
36
|
-
|
||
Palisades
|
41
|
-
|
||
Pilgrim
|
31
|
-
|
Other Income Statement
Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $899 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 to
$906 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due
to:
·
|
an
increase of $17 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
|
·
|
a
reimbursement of $7 million of costs in 2008 in connection with
a litigation settlement; and
|
·
|
an
increase of $5 million in customer service costs primarily as a result of
write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
|
These
increases were substantially offset by a decrease of $22 million in
payroll-related and benefits costs.
Taxes other than income taxes increased
primarily due to the favorable resolution in the first quarter 2008 of issues
relating to the tax exempt status of bonds for the Utility, which reduced taxes
other than income taxes in 2008. Approximately half of the decrease in 2008
related to resolution of this issue is at System Energy and has no effect on net
income because System Energy also has a corresponding decrease in its net
revenue.
11
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other income increased primarily due
to:
·
|
distributions
of $27 million earned by Entergy Louisiana and $10 million earned by
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana on investments in preferred membership
interests of Entergy Holdings Company. The distributions on
preferred membership interests are eliminated in consolidation and have no
effect on net income because the investment is in another Entergy
subsidiary. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources - Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita – Storm Cost
Financings" in the Form 10-K for discussion of these investments in
preferred membership interests;
|
·
|
carrying
charges of $19 million on Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs as
authorized by Texas legislation in the second quarter 2009;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $14 million in allowance for equity funds used during
construction due to more construction work in progress primarily as a
result of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike.
|
This
increase was partially offset by a decrease of $11 million resulting from lower
interest earned on the decommissioning trust funds and short-term investments
and a decrease of $11 million in taxes collected on advances for transmission
projects.
Interest charges increased primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding resulting from debt issuances
by certain of the Utility operating companies in the second half of 2008 and the
first half of 2009.
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $382 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 to
$404 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to $24 million
in outside service costs and incremental labor costs related to the planned
spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear business.
Other income decreased primarily due to
$85 million in charges in 2009 compared to $28 million in charges in 2008
resulting from the recognition of impairments of certain equity securities held
in Non-Utility Nuclear's decommissioning trust funds that are not considered
temporary.
Parent
& Other
Other income decreased primarily due to
the elimination for consolidation purposes of distributions earned of
$27 million by Entergy Louisiana and $10 million by Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana on investments in preferred membership interests of Entergy Holdings
Company, as discussed above.
Interest charges decreased primarily
due to lower interest rates on borrowings under Entergy Corporation's revolving
credit facility.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 35.0% and 38.9%,
respectively. The effective income tax rate is equal to the statutory
rate of 35% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to the
reductions in the effective income tax rate discussed below being offset by
increases related to state income taxes at the Utility operating companies and
book and tax differences for utility plant items. The effective income tax rate
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflected reductions related
to:
·
|
an
adjustment to state income taxes for Non-Utility Nuclear to reflect the
effect of a change in the methodology of computing Massachusetts state
income taxes as required by that state's taxing
authority;
|
·
|
the
recognition of state loss carryovers that had been subject to a valuation
allowance; and
|
·
|
the
recognition of a federal capital loss carryover that had been subject to a
valuation allowance.
|
12
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
The difference in the effective income
tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the six months ended June 30, 2008
is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences for utility
plant items, partially offset by an adjustment to state income taxes for
Non-Utility Nuclear to reflect the effect of a change in the methodology of
computing New York state income taxes as required by that state's taxing
authority.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy's
capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and
sources of capital. Following are updates to that
discussion.
Capital
Structure
Entergy's capitalization is balanced
between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The
decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily due to
the repayment of borrowings under Entergy Corporation's revolving credit
facility in 2009. Also contributing to the decrease is the
unsuccessful remarketing of $500 million of notes associated with Entergy
Corporation's equity units resulting in a decrease in long-term debt and an
increase in common shareholders' equity.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
53.0%
|
55.6%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
2.9%
|
4.1%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
55.9%
|
59.7%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, common
shareholders' equity, and subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking
fund. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash
equivalents. Entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in
analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to
its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy's financial
condition.
As
discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Corporation has in place a $3.5 billion
credit facility that expires in August 2012. Entergy Corporation has
the ability to issue letters of credit against the total borrowing capacity of
the facility. As of June 30, 2009, amounts outstanding under the
credit facility are:
Capacity
|
Borrowings
|
Letters
of
Credit
|
Capacity
Available
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
$3,500
|
$2,435
|
$28
|
$1,037
|
Entergy
Corporation's credit facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio
of 65% or less of its total capitalization. The calculation of this
debt ratio under Entergy Corporation's credit facility and in the indenture
governing the Entergy Corporation senior notes is different than the calculation
of the debt to capital ratio above. Entergy is currently in
compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio,
or if Entergy or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New
Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings, an acceleration of the facility's maturity date may occur,
and there may be an acceleration of amounts due under Entergy Corporation's
senior notes.
See Note 4 to the financial statements
herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and
discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries' credit facilities.
13
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital
Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
See the table and discussion in the
Form 10-K under "MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources -
Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital," that sets forth the
amounts of planned construction and other capital investments by operating
segment for 2009 through 2011. Following is an update to the
discussion in the Form 10-K.
Little Gypsy Repowering
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Louisiana's Little Gypsy repowering project. On March 11,
2009, the LPSC voted in favor of a motion directing Entergy Louisiana to
temporarily suspend the repowering project and, based upon an analysis of the
project's economic viability, to make a recommendation regarding whether to
proceed with the project. This action was based upon a number of
factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices, as well as
environmental concerns, the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in
the capital/financial markets. On
April 1, 2009, Entergy Louisiana complied with the LPSC's directive and
recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of
three years or more. Entergy Louisiana estimates that its total costs
for the project, if suspended, including actual spending to date and estimated
contract cancellation costs, will be approximately $300
million. Entergy Louisiana had obtained all major environmental
permits required to begin construction. A longer-term suspension
places these permits at risk and may adversely affect the project's economics
and technological feasibility. On May 22, 2009, the LPSC issued an
order declaring that Entergy Louisiana's decision to place the Little Gypsy
project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public
interest and prudent. Entergy Louisiana expects to make a filing
later in 2009 with the LPSC regarding the recovery of project costs already
incurred.
Waterford 3 Steam Generator
Replacement Project
In July 2009 the LPSC granted Entergy
Louisiana's motion to dismiss, without prejudice, its application seeking
recovery of cash earnings on construction work in progress (CWIP) for the steam
generator replacement project, acknowledging Entergy Louisiana's right, at any
time, to seek cash earnings on CWIP if Entergy Louisiana believes that
circumstances or projected circumstances are such that a request for cash
earnings on CWIP is merited. The cash earnings on CWIP application
had been consolidated with a similar request for the Little Gypsy repowering
project that was also dismissed in response to the same motion.
White Bluff Coal Plant
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the environmental compliance project that will install scrubbers and low NOx
burners at Entergy Arkansas' White Bluff coal plant. In March 2009,
Entergy Arkansas made a filing with the APSC seeking a declaratory order that
the White Bluff project is in the public interest. In May 2009 the
APSC Staff filed a motion requesting that the APSC require Entergy Arkansas to
file testimony on several issues. In a subsequent order the APSC set
a procedural schedule that includes an evidentiary hearing beginning on February
16, 2010. In addition, in June 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed with the
APSC, under Arkansas Act 310, an interim surcharge to recover the costs incurred
through May 31, 2009, on the White Bluff project. Entergy Arkansas
has incurred $1.9 million through May 31, 2009. Under Arkansas Act
310 the surcharge goes into effect immediately upon filing, subject to refund,
and additional surcharge filings are permitted every six months. On
July 20, 2009, the APSC staff filed a motion with the APSC requesting that the
APSC enter an order regarding the conduct of this and subsequent Act 310 filings
related to the White Bluff project, including requiring Entergy Arkansas to
provide additional information and justification for costs recovered pursuant to
Act 310. In July 2009 the Arkansas attorney general filed a motion in
the Act 310 proceeding opposing the imposition of the surcharge, and challenging
Entergy Arkansas' cost calculation.
14
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Pension
Contributions
For an update to the discussion on
pension contributions see "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates - Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits – Costs and
Funding."
Other Uses of Capital
Following are other significant, or
potentially significant, uses of capital by Entergy, in addition to those
discussed in the Form 10-K, that may change Entergy's expected level of capital
expenditures or other uses of capital:
·
|
As
discussed in the Form 10-K as a potential use of capital, System Energy
plans a 178 MW uprate of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant. The
project is expected to cost $575 million. On May 22, 2009, a
petition and supporting testimony were filed at the MPSC requesting a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for implementation of the
uprate. The City of New Orleans is the only party that has
intervened in the case. No procedural schedule has been set for
the case.
|
·
|
The
issues discussed below in Independent
Coordinator of Transmission involving the transmission business
will likely result in increased capital expenditures by the Utility
operating companies.
|
·
|
Recent
NRC security requirement changes will likely result in increased capital
expenditures in 2009 and 2010 for both the Utility and Non-Utility Nuclear
nuclear plants.
|
·
|
On
June 18, 2009, the NRC issued letters indicating that the NRC staff had
concluded that there were shortfalls in the amount of decommissioning
funding assurance provided for Waterford 3, River Bend, Indian Point 2,
Vermont Yankee, and Palisades. The NRC staff conducted a
telephone conference with Entergy on this issue on June 29, 2009, and
Entergy agreed to submit a plan by August 13, 2009, for addressing the
identified shortfalls. Entergy is reviewing the current amount
of any shortfalls and the amounts of potential additional assurance that
may be provided as part of the required
plan.
|
Sources
of Capital
The short-term borrowings of the
Registrant Subsidiaries and certain other Entergy subsidiaries are limited to
amounts authorized by the FERC. The current FERC-authorized limits
are effective through March 31, 2010, as established by a FERC order issued
March 31, 2008 (except for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas,
which are effective through November 8, 2009, as established by an earlier FERC
order). See Note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion
of Entergy's short-term borrowing limits.
Cash
Flow Activity
As shown in Entergy's Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$1,920
|
$1,253
|
||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
||||
Operating
activities
|
1,016
|
914
|
||
Investing
activities
|
(1,120)
|
(1,008)
|
||
Financing
activities
|
(536)
|
(73)
|
||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(640)
|
(167)
|
||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$1,280
|
$1,086
|
15
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Operating
Activities
Entergy's cash flow provided by
operating activities increased by $102 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. Following are
cash flows from operating activities by segment:
·
|
Utility
provided $678 million in cash from operating activities in 2009 compared
to providing $398 million in 2008 primarily due to increased
collection of fuel costs and a decrease of $53 million in pension
contributions, partially offset by Hurricane Gustav, Hurricane Ike, and
Arkansas ice storm restoration spending, and working capital
requirements.
|
·
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear provided $472 million (excluding the effect of intercompany
transactions) in cash from operating activities in 2009 compared to
providing $594 million in 2008 primarily due to more refueling outage days
in 2009 than in 2008, spending related to the planned separation of
Non-Utility Nuclear, and an increase of $28 million in pension
contributions.
|
·
|
Parent
& Other used approximately $133 million (excluding the effect of
intercompany transactions) in cash from operating activities in 2009
compared to using $78 million in 2008 primarily due to spending related to
the planned separation of Non-Utility Nuclear and a $16 million increase
in income taxes paid.
|
Investing
Activities
Net cash used in investing activities
increased by $112 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2008. The following significant investing
cash flow activity occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008:
·
|
Construction
expenditures were $153 million higher in 2009 than in 2008 due to an
increase in Utility spending of $75 million primarily due to Hurricane
Gustav, Hurricane Ike, and Arkansas ice storm restoration spending and an
increase of $79 million in Non-Utility Nuclear spending due to various
projects.
|
·
|
Net
nuclear fuel purchases increased by $63 million primarily due to
Non-Utility Nuclear preparing for more refueling outages in 2009 than in
2008.
|
·
|
In
March 2008, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana purchased the Calcasieu
Generating Facility, a 322 MW simple-cycle, gas-fired power plant located
near the city of Sulphur in southwestern Louisiana, for approximately $56
million.
|
·
|
Receipt
in 2008 of insurance proceeds from Entergy New Orleans' Hurricane Katrina
claim.
|
·
|
In
2008, Non-Utility Nuclear posted $102 million of cash as collateral in
support of its agreements to sell
power.
|
Financing
Activities
Net cash used in financing activities
increased by $463 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2008. The following significant financing
cash flow activity occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008:
·
|
Entergy
Corporation decreased the net borrowings under its credit facility by $802
million in 2009 compared to increasing the net borrowings under its credit
facility by $521 million in 2008. See Note 4 to the
financial statements for a description of the Entergy Corporation credit
facility.
|
·
|
Entergy
Texas issued $500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds in January 2009
and used a portion of the proceeds to repay $100 million in borrowings
outstanding on its long-term credit facility and $70.8 million in
long-term debt prior to maturity.
|
·
|
Entergy
Texas issued $150 million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds in May 2009 and
Entergy Mississippi issued $150 million of 6.64% Series First Mortgage
Bonds in June 2009.
|
·
|
The
Utility operating companies increased the borrowings outstanding on their
long-term credit facilities by $230 million in
2008.
|
·
|
The
Utility operating companies increased the borrowings outstanding on their
short-term credit facilities by $150 million in
2008.
|
16
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
·
|
Entergy
Corporation repaid $87 million of notes payable at their maturity in March
2008.
|
·
|
Entergy
Corporation repurchased $370 million of its common stock in
2008.
|
Rate, Cost-recovery, and
Other Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS - Rate,
Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation" in the Form 10-K for
discussions of rate regulation and federal regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
State
and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See the Form 10-K for a chart
summarizing material rate proceedings. See Note 2 to the financial
statements herein for updates to the proceedings discussed in that
chart.
Federal
Regulation
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
federal regulatory proceedings. Following are updates to that
discussion.
System Agreement
Proceedings
Entergy's
Utility Operating Companies' Compliance Filing
On July 6, 2009, the D.C. Circuit
denied the LPSC's appeal of the FERC's order accepting the Utility operating
companies' compliance filing to implement the provisions of the FERC's rough
production cost equalization bandwidth decision.
Rough
Production Cost Equalization Rates
2008
Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2007 Production Costs
The parties reached a partial
settlement agreement of certain of the issues initially raised in this
proceeding. The partial settlement agreement was conditioned on the
FERC accepting the agreement without modification or condition. On
June 19, 2009, the ALJ certified the partial settlement agreement to the FERC
for its consideration. A hearing on the remaining issues in the
proceeding was completed in June 2009. Additionally, on June 5, 2009,
the FERC issued an order denying the Utility operating companies' request for
clarification on the scope of the hearing.
2009
Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2008 Production Costs
In May 2009, Entergy filed with the
FERC the rates for the third year to implement the FERC's order in the System
Agreement proceeding. The filing shows the following
payments/receipts among the Utility operating companies for 2009, based on
calendar year 2008 production costs, commencing for service in June 2009, are
necessary to achieve rough production cost equalization under the FERC's
orders:
Payments
or
(Receipts)
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
|
Entergy
Arkansas
|
$390
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
($107)
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
($140)
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
($24)
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
$-
|
Entergy
Texas
|
($119)
|
17
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Several
parties intervened in the proceeding at the FERC, including the LPSC and Ameren,
which have also filed protests. On July 27, 2009, the
FERC accepted Entergy's proposed rates for filing, effective June 1,
2009, subject to refund, and set the proceeding for hearing and
settlement procedures. A settlement judge was appointed and a
settlement conference with the judge is scheduled for August 11,
2009.
Entergy
Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi Notices of Termination of System Agreement
Participation and Related APSC Investigation
On February 2, 2009, Entergy Arkansas
and Entergy Mississippi filed with the FERC their notices of cancellation to
effectuate the termination of their participation in the Entergy System
Agreement, effective December 18, 2013 and November 7, 2015,
respectively. While the FERC had indicated previously that the
notices should be filed 18 months prior to Entergy Arkansas' termination
(approximately mid-2012), the filing explains that resolving this issue now,
rather than later, is important to ensure that informed long-term resource
planning decisions can be made during the years leading up to Entergy Arkansas'
withdrawal and that all of the Utility operating companies are properly
positioned to continue to operate reliably following Entergy Arkansas' and,
eventually, Entergy Mississippi's, departure from the System
Agreement. Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi requested that
the FERC accept the proposed notices of cancellation without further
proceedings. Various parties intervened or filed protests in the
proceeding, including the APSC, the LPSC, the MPSC, and the City
Council. The APSC and the MPSC support the notices, but the other
parties generally request either dismissal of the filings or that the proceeding
be set for hearing. Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi
responded to the interventions and protests. Entergy Arkansas and
Entergy Mississippi reiterated their request that the FERC accept the proposed
notices of cancellation. If further inquiry by the FERC is necessary,
Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi proposed that the FERC institute a
paper hearing to resolve the major policy and legal issues and then, if
necessary, set any remaining factual questions for an expedited
hearing.
Interruptible
Load Proceeding
Following the filing of petitioners'
initial briefs, the FERC filed a motion requesting the D.C. Circuit hold the
appeal of the FERC's decisions ordering refunds in the interruptible load
proceeding in abeyance and remand the record to the FERC. The D.C.
Circuit granted the FERC's unopposed motion on June 24, 2009, and directed the
FERC to file status reports at 60-day intervals beginning August 24,
2009. The D.C. Circuit also directed the parties to file motions to
govern future proceedings in the case within 30 days of the completion of the
FERC proceedings.
June 2009
LPSC Complaint Proceeding
In June 2009, the LPSC filed a
complaint requesting that the FERC determine that certain of Entergy Arkansas'
sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violated the provisions of the
System Agreement that allocate the energy generated by Entergy System resources,
(b) imprudently denied the Entergy System and its ultimate consumers the
benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violated the
provision of the System Agreement that prohibits sales to third parties by
individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-first-refusal to other
Utility operating companies. The LPSC's complaint challenges
sales made beginning in 2002 and requests refunds. On July 20, 2009,
the Utility operating companies filed a response to the complaint requesting
that the FERC dismiss the complaint on the merits without hearing because the
LPSC has failed to meet its burden of showing any violation of the System
Agreement and failed to produce any evidence of imprudent action by the Entergy
System. In their response, the Utility operating companies explained
that the System Agreement clearly contemplates that the Utility operating
companies may make sales to third parties for their own account, subject to the
requirement that those sales be included in the load (or load shape) for the
applicable Utility operating company. The response further explains
that the FERC already has determined that Entergy Arkansas' short-term wholesale
sales did not trigger the "right-of-first-refusal" provision of the System
Agreement. While the D.C. Circuit recently determined that the
"right-of-first-refusal" issue was not properly before the FERC at the time of
its earlier decision on the issue, the LPSC has raised no additional claims or
facts that would warrant the FERC reaching a different
conclusion. The matter is pending before the FERC and a procedural
schedule has not been set.
18
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Independent Coordinator of
Transmission
In the FERC's April 2006 order that
approved Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal, the
FERC stated that the Weekly Procurement Process (WPP) must be operational within
approximately 14 months of the FERC order, or June 24, 2007, or the FERC may
reevaluate all approvals to proceed with the ICT. The Utility operating
companies filed status reports with the FERC notifying the FERC that, due to
unexpected issues with the development of the WPP software and testing, the WPP
was still not operational. The Utility operating companies also filed
various tariff revisions with the FERC in 2007 and 2008 to address issues
identified during the testing of the WPP and changes to the effective date of
the WPP. On October 10, 2008, the FERC issued an order accepting a
tariff amendment establishing that the WPP shall take effect at a date to be
determined, after completion of successful simulation trials and the ICT's
endorsement of the WPP's implementation. On January 16, 2009, the
Utility operating companies filed a compliance filing with the FERC that
included the ICT's endorsement of the WPP implementation, subject to the FERC's
acceptance of certain additional tariff amendments and the completion of
simulation testing and certain other items. The Utility operating
companies filed the tariff amendments supported by the ICT on the same
day. The amendments proposed to further amend the WPP to (a) limit
supplier offers in the WPP to on-peak periods and (b) eliminate the granting of
certain transmission service through the WPP.
On March 17, 2009, the FERC issued an
order conditionally approving the proposed modification to the WPP to allow the
process to be implemented the week of March 23, 2009. In its order
approving the requested modifications, the FERC imposed additional conditions
related to the ICT arrangement and indicated it was going to evaluate the
success of the ICT arrangement, including the cost and benefits of implementing
the WPP and whether the WPP goes far enough to address the transmission access
issues that the ICT and WPP were intended to address. The FERC, in
conjunction with the APSC, the LPSC, the MPSC, the PUCT, and the City Council,
hosted a conference on June 24, 2009, to discuss the ICT arrangement and
transmission access on the Entergy transmission system.
During the conference, several issues
were raised by regulators and market participants, including the adequacy of the
Utility operating companies' capital investment in the transmission system, the
Utility operating companies' compliance with the existing North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) reliability planning standards, the
availability of transmission service across the system, and whether the Utility
operating companies could have purchased lower cost power from merchant
generators located on the transmission system rather than running their older
generating facilities. On July 20, 2009, the Utility operating
companies filed comments with the FERC responding to the issues raised during
the conference. The comments explain that: 1) the Utility operating
companies believe that the ICT arrangement has fulfilled its objectives; 2) the
Utility operating companies' transmission planning practices comply with laws
and regulations regarding the planning and operation of the transmission system;
and 3) these planning practices have resulted in a system that meets applicable
reliability standards and is sufficiently robust to allow the Utility operating
companies both to substantially increase the amount of transmission service
available to third parties and to make significant amounts of economic purchases
from the wholesale market for the benefit of the Utility operating companies'
retail customers. The Utility operating companies also explain
that, as with other transmission systems, there are certain times during which
congestion occurs on the Utility operating companies' transmission system that
limits the ability of the Utility operating companies as well as other parties
to fully utilitize the generating resources that have been granted transmission
service. Additionally, the Utility operating companies commit in their
response to exploring and working on potential reforms or alternatives for the
ICT arrangement that could take effect following the initial
term. The Utility operating companies' comments also recognize that
NERC is in the process of amending certain of its transmission reliability
planning standards and that the amended standards, if approved by the FERC, will
result in more stringent transmission planning criteria being applicable in the
future. The FERC may also make other changes to transmission
reliability standards. These changes to the reliability standards
would result in increased capital expenditures by the Utility operating
companies.
19
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Market and Credit Risk
Sensitive Instruments
Commodity
Price Risk
Power
Generation
As discussed more fully in the Form
10-K, the sale of electricity from the power generation plants owned by
Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear business, unless otherwise contracted, is subject
to the fluctuation of market power prices. Following is an updated
summary of the amount of the Non-Utility Nuclear business' output that is
currently sold forward under physical or financial contracts (2009 represents
the remaining two quarters of the year):
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||
Percent
of planned generation sold forward:
|
||||||||||
Unit-contingent
|
49%
|
46%
|
37%
|
18%
|
12%
|
|||||
Unit-contingent with
availability guarantees (1)
|
38%
|
35%
|
17%
|
7%
|
6%
|
|||||
Total
|
87%
|
81%
|
54%
|
25%
|
18%
|
|||||
Planned
generation (TWh)
|
22
|
40
|
41
|
41
|
40
|
|||||
Average
contracted price per MWh (2)
|
$62
|
$58
|
$56
|
$54
|
$50
|
(1)
|
A
sale of power on a unit-contingent basis coupled with a guarantee of
availability provides for the payment to the power purchaser of contract
damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a
result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power
at or above a specified availability threshold. All of
Entergy's outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits
on Entergy's maximum liability under such guarantees.
|
(2)
|
The
Vermont Yankee acquisition included a 10-year PPA under which the former
owners will buy most of the power produced by the plant, which is through
the expiration in 2012 of the current operating license for the
plant. The PPA includes an adjustment clause under which the
prices specified in the PPA will be adjusted downward monthly, beginning
in November 2005, if power market prices drop below prices specified in
the PPA, which has not happened thus
far.
|
Some
of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear
power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide
collateral to secure its obligations under the agreements. The
Entergy subsidiary is required to provide collateral based upon the difference
between the current market and contracted power prices in the regions where
Non-Utility Nuclear sells power. The primary form of collateral to
satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty. Cash and
letters of credit are also acceptable forms of collateral. At June 30,
2009, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had $415 million of
collateral in place to support Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing transactional
activity, consisting primarily of Entergy Corporation guarantees, but also
including $20 million of guarantees that support letters of credit and $2
million of cash collateral. As of June 30, 2009, the credit exposure
associated with Non-Utility Nuclear assurance requirements could increase by an
estimated amount of up to $213 million for each $1 per MMBtu increase in gas
prices in both the short- and long-term markets, but because market prices have
fallen below contract prices, gas prices would have to change by more than $1
per MMBtu to change significantly the actual amount of collateral
posted. In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation's credit
rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of June 30, 2009,
Entergy would have been required under some of the agreements to replace
approximately $72 million of the Entergy Corporation guarantees with cash or
letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, for the planned
energy output under contract for Non-Utility Nuclear through 2013, 68% of the
planned energy output is under contract with counterparties with public
investment grade credit ratings; 31% is with counterparties with public
non-investment grade credit ratings, primarily a utility from which Non-Utility
Nuclear purchased one of its power plants and entered into a long-term
fixed-price purchased power agreement; and 1% is with load-serving entities
without public credit ratings.
20
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
In
addition to selling the power produced by its plants, the Non-Utility Nuclear
business sells unforced capacity that is used to meet requirements placed on
load-serving distribution companies by the ISO in their
area. Following is a summary of the amount of the Non-Utility Nuclear
business' unforced capacity that is currently sold forward, and the blended
amount of the Non-Utility Nuclear business' planned generation output and
unforced capacity that is currently sold forward (2009 represents the remaining
two quarters of the year):
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||
Percent
of capacity sold forward:
|
||||||||||
Bundled capacity and energy
contracts
|
26%
|
26%
|
25%
|
18%
|
16%
|
|||||
Capacity
contracts
|
58%
|
35%
|
26%
|
10%
|
0%
|
|||||
Total
|
84%
|
61%
|
51%
|
28%
|
16%
|
|||||
Planned
net MW in operation
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
|||||
Average
capacity contract price per kW per month
|
$2.4
|
$3.3
|
$3.6
|
$3.6
|
$-
|
|||||
Blended Capacity and Energy (based on
revenues)
|
||||||||||
%
of planned generation and capacity sold forward
|
91%
|
81%
|
54%
|
22%
|
15%
|
|||||
Average
contract revenue per MWh
|
$64
|
$60
|
$59
|
$56
|
$50
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy's accounting for nuclear decommissioning
costs, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund
investments, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other
contingencies. The following are updates to that
discussion.
Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs
In the first quarter 2009, Entergy
Arkansas recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities
for ANO 1 and 2 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost
study. The revised estimates resulted in an $8.9 million reduction in
its decommissioning liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the
related regulatory asset.
In the second quarter 2009, System
Energy recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for
Grand Gulf as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The
revised estimate resulted in a $4.2 million reduction in its decommissioning
liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related regulatory
asset.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Costs and
Funding
The recent decline in stock market
prices will affect Entergy's planned levels of contributions in the future.
Minimum required funding calculations as determined under Pension
Protection Act guidance are performed annually as of January 1 of each year and
are based on measurements of the market-related values of assets and funding
liabilities as measured at that date. An excess of the funding liability
over the market-related value of assets results in a funding shortfall which,
under the Pension Protection Act, must be funded over a seven-year rolling
period. The Pension Protection Act also imposes certain plan
limitations if the funded percentage, which is based on the market-related
values of assets divided by funding liabilities, does not meet certain
thresholds. Entergy's minimum required contributions for the 2009
plan year are generally payable in installments throughout 2009 and 2010 and are
based on the funding calculations as of January 1, 2009. The final date at
which 2009 plan year contributions may be made is September 15, 2010.
21
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
On March
31, 2009, the United States Treasury Department issued guidance that allows plan
sponsors to use interest rates earlier in 2008 to measure the present value of
the funding liability at January 1, 2009. Prior to this change, the
rates required to be used for Entergy were from the month of December 2008 and
the sharp decrease in interest rates during December 2008 was expected to
generate significant increases in the funding liability. A higher
liability coupled with losses in the fair market value of pension assets would
have increased the funding shortfall at January 1, 2009 and resulted in larger
future contributions for the 2009 plan year, payable in 2009 and 2010 as
described above. Entergy's January 1, 2009 funding liability
valuation was favorably affected by this guidance and 2009 contributions are not
expected to materially increase. However, to the extent that the
higher interest rates experienced in 2008 do not recur in future periods and the
fair market values of pension assets do not significantly recover, Entergy's
January 1, 2010 funded status could be adversely affected and significantly
increase future minimum required pension plan contributions. In
addition to the minimum required contribution required under the Pension
Protection Act to fund a shortfall based on the seven year rolling amortization,
additional contributions could be needed in 2010 to avoid the plan limitations
noted above. The necessity of such contributions and the actual
funded status will be based on a number of factors, including asset performance
through 2009 and the interest rates required to be used to measure funded status
at January 1, 2010, and therefore cannot be determined at this
time.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In December 2008 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets"
(FSP 132(R)-1), that requires enhanced disclosures about plan assets of defined
benefit pension and other postretirement plans, including disclosure of each
major category of plan assets using the fair value hierarchy and concentrations
of risk within plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2009.
In June 2009 the FASB issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46R (FIN 46R)" (SFAS 167). FIN 46R is entitled "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities". SFAS 167 amends FIN 46R to replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which
enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to
direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
impact the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses
of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the
entity. SFAS 167 also requires additional disclosures on an interim
and annual basis about an enterprise's involvement in variable interest
entities. The standard will be effective for Entergy in the first quarter of
2010. Entergy does not expect the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a material
effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
22
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 1,918,446 | $ | 2,524,222 | $ | 3,945,363 | $ | 4,570,449 | ||||||||
Natural
gas
|
28,834 | 53,985 | 102,884 | 143,380 | ||||||||||||
Competitive
businesses
|
573,509 | 686,064 | 1,261,654 | 1,415,176 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,520,789 | 3,264,271 | 5,309,901 | 6,129,005 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
521,071 | 726,836 | 1,367,060 | 1,267,337 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
322,919 | 748,203 | 646,174 | 1,368,845 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
60,234 | 55,840 | 117,013 | 107,098 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
696,345 | 710,309 | 1,341,389 | 1,321,577 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
49,307 | 46,816 | 98,050 | 92,812 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
122,401 | 125,942 | 256,798 | 234,513 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
260,689 | 247,977 | 518,541 | 492,962 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
13,327 | 34,239 | (16,147 | ) | 69,519 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,046,293 | 2,696,162 | 4,328,878 | 4,954,663 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
474,496 | 568,109 | 981,023 | 1,174,342 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
15,782 | 9,085 | 32,730 | 18,371 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
58,892 | 47,803 | 105,278 | 105,740 | ||||||||||||
Other
than temporary impairment losses
|
(69,203 | ) | (24,404 | ) | (84,939 | ) | (28,060 | ) | ||||||||
Equity
in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated equity affiliates
|
1,369 | (2,572 | ) | (1,758 | ) | (3,501 | ) | |||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(14,723 | ) | 3,916 | (24,895 | ) | (7,640 | ) | |||||||||
TOTAL
|
(7,883 | ) | 33,828 | 26,416 | 84,910 | |||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
125,157 | 119,903 | 253,123 | 243,047 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
27,487 | 28,030 | 46,780 | 60,567 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(8,483 | ) | (4,937 | ) | (18,294 | ) | (10,053 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
144,161 | 142,996 | 281,609 | 293,561 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
322,452 | 458,941 | 725,830 | 965,691 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
90,641 | 183,012 | 253,686 | 376,015 | ||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
NET INCOME
|
231,811 | 275,929 | 472,144 | 589,676 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
4,998 | 4,975 | 9,996 | 9,973 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 226,813 | $ | 270,954 | $ | 462,148 | $ | 579,703 | ||||||||
Earnings
per average common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 1.16 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 2.38 | $ | 3.02 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 1.14 | $ | 1.37 | $ | 2.35 | $ | 2.93 | ||||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 | ||||||||
Basic
average number of common shares outstanding
|
196,105,002 | 191,326,928 | 194,359,001 | 191,983,266 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
198,243,169 | 197,864,459 | 198,150,768 | 198,101,863 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
23
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
net income
|
$ | 472,144 | $ | 589,676 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow
|
||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Reserve
for regulatory adjustments
|
(1,630 | ) | (2,808 | ) | ||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(16,147 | ) | 69,519 | |||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
616,591 | 585,774 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
249,448 | 365,337 | ||||||
Equity
in losses of unconsolidated equity affiliates - net of
dividends
|
1,758 | 3,501 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
1,888 | (216,810 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
(3,963 | ) | (12,257 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
(58,177 | ) | 357,503 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
5,193 | - | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
(37,043 | ) | (48,799 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel
|
266,062 | (555,444 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(157,092 | ) | (218,001 | ) | ||||
Provision for estimated losses and reserves
|
(18,642 | ) | 10,680 | |||||
Changes in other regulatory assets
|
(455,577 | ) | 39,964 | |||||
Other
|
151,536 | (54,266 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
1,016,349 | 913,569 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction/capital
expenditures
|
(932,056 | ) | (778,818 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
32,730 | 18,371 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(149,568 | ) | (217,487 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
21,210 | 152,353 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of assets and businesses
|
8,654 | 30,725 | ||||||
Payment
for purchase of plant
|
- | (56,409 | ) | |||||
Insurance
proceeds received for property damages
|
- | 63,088 | ||||||
Changes
in transition charge account
|
2,962 | 9,171 | ||||||
NYPA
value sharing payment
|
(72,000 | ) | (72,000 | ) | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in other investments
|
17,111 | (95,166 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
1,282,206 | 748,181 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(1,330,730 | ) | (809,653 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(1,119,481 | ) | (1,007,644 | ) | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
24
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of:
|
||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
783,304 | 1,800,543 | ||||||
Common
stock and treasury stock
|
2,691 | 27,862 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(1,022,790 | ) | (1,383,393 | ) | ||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
- | (369,612 | ) | |||||
Changes
in credit line borrowings - net
|
- | 150,000 | ||||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(289,159 | ) | (288,172 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(9,995 | ) | (10,030 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in financing activities
|
(535,949 | ) | (72,802 | ) | ||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(503 | ) | (430 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(639,584 | ) | (167,307 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,920,491 | 1,253,728 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 1,280,907 | $ | 1,086,421 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 321,186 | $ | 340,077 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | (3,139 | ) | $ | 127,856 | |||
Noncash
financing activities:
|
||||||||
Long-term
debt retired (equity unit notes)
|
$ | (500,000 | ) | $ | - | |||
Common
stock issued in settlement of equity unit purchase
contracts
|
$ | 500,000 | $ | - | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
25
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 75,261 | $ | 115,876 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
1,205,646 | 1,804,615 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
1,280,907 | 1,920,491 | ||||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
9,100 | 12,062 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
566,540 | 734,204 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(31,220 | ) | (25,610 | ) | ||||
Other
|
206,245 | 206,627 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
353,819 | 282,914 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
1,095,384 | 1,198,135 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
24,736 | 167,092 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
69,139 | 7,307 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
220,108 | 216,145 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
799,180 | 776,170 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
245,336 | 221,803 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
334,286 | 394,000 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
351,890 | 247,184 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
4,430,066 | 5,160,389 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
67,775 | 66,247 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
2,894,147 | 2,832,243 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
239,028 | 231,115 | ||||||
Other
|
113,193 | 107,939 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,314,143 | 3,237,544 | ||||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
35,530,870 | 34,495,406 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
744,794 | 745,504 | ||||||
Natural
gas
|
307,232 | 303,769 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
1,566,268 | 1,712,761 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
424,076 | 465,374 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
671,209 | 636,813 | ||||||
TOTAL
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
39,244,449 | 38,359,627 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
16,425,279 | 15,930,513 | ||||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET
|
22,819,170 | 22,429,114 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
622,227 | 581,719 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
3,666,893 | 3,615,104 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
172,202 | 168,122 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
377,172 | 377,172 | ||||||
Other
|
1,083,347 | 1,047,654 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
5,921,841 | 5,789,771 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 36,485,220 | $ | 36,616,818 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
26
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 805,684 | $ | 544,460 | ||||
Notes
payable
|
55,034 | 55,034 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
949,758 | 1,475,745 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
318,115 | 302,303 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
80,403 | 75,210 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
150,267 | 187,310 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
311,325 | 183,539 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
164,702 | 162,393 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
38,849 | 46,288 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
418,640 | 460,315 | ||||||
Other
|
208,442 | 273,297 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,501,219 | 3,765,894 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
6,955,214 | 6,565,770 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
316,982 | 325,570 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
300,025 | 343,093 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
360,492 | 280,643 | ||||||
Decommissioning
and asset retirement cost liabilities
|
2,761,435 | 2,677,495 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
129,603 | 147,452 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
2,140,471 | 2,177,993 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
10,184,849 | 11,174,289 | ||||||
Other
|
757,406 | 880,998 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
23,906,477 | 24,573,303 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Subsidiaries'
preferred stock without sinking fund
|
217,050 | 217,029 | ||||||
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
254,772,087 shares in 2009 and 248,174,087 shares in 2008
|
2,548 | 2,482 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
5,375,265 | 4,869,303 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
7,562,587 | 7,382,719 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(10,614 | ) | (112,698 | ) | ||||
Less
- treasury stock, at cost (58,649,184 shares in 2009 and
|
||||||||
58,815,518
shares in 2008)
|
4,163,312 | 4,175,214 | ||||||
Total
common shareholders' equity
|
8,766,474 | 7,966,592 | ||||||
Subsidiaries'
preferred stock without sinking fund
|
94,000 | 94,000 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
8,860,474 | 8,060,592 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$ | 36,485,220 | $ | 36,616,818 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
27
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, AND PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 7,482,329 | $ | 6,900,345 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
226,813 | $ | 226,813 | 270,954 | $ | 270,954 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
146,555 | 143,669 | ||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 7,562,587 | $ | 7,027,630 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
$ | 208,544 | $ | (191,306 | ) | |||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(233,089 | ) | (111,281 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses)
|
(36,184 | ) | 89,061 | |||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
2,263 | 6,377 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
(58,466 | ) | (207,149 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
derivative instrument fair value changes arising
|
||||||||||||||||
during
the period (net of tax benefit of $(14,567) and
($160,474))
|
(23,728 | ) | (23,728 | ) | (285,280 | ) | (285,280 | ) | ||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense
(benefit) of ($493) and $348) |
(41 | ) | (41 | ) | 2,247 | 2,247 | ||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses) (net of tax expense
(benefit) of $74,927 and ($7,901)) |
70,275 | 70,275 | (21,223 | ) | (21,223 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation (net of tax expense of $725 and $241)
|
1,346 | 1,346 | 447 | 447 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
184,816 | (476,586 | ) | |||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(233,130 | ) | (109,034 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains
|
34,091 | 67,838 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,609 | 6,824 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (10,614 | ) | $ | (510,958 | ) | ||||||||||
Add:
preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
4,998 | 4,975 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
$ | 279,663 | $ | (27,880 | ) | |||||||||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 5,370,446 | $ | 4,853,837 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuances related to stock plans
|
4,819 | 6,644 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
4,819 | 6,644 | ||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - End of period
|
$ | 5,375,265 | $ | 4,860,481 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
28
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, AND PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 7,382,719 | $ | 6,735,965 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
462,148 | $ | 462,148 | 579,703 | $ | 579,703 | ||||||||||
Adjustment
related to FSP FAS 115-2 implementation
|
6,365 | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
468,513 | 579,703 | ||||||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
288,645 | 288,038 | ||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 7,562,587 | $ | 7,027,630 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
$ | 120,830 | $ | (12,540 | ) | |||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(232,232 | ) | (107,145 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses)
|
(4,402 | ) | 121,611 | |||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,106 | 6,394 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
(112,698 | ) | 8,320 | |||||||||||||
Net
derivative instrument fair value changes arising during
|
||||||||||||||||
the
period (net of tax expense (benefit) of $42,619 and
($259,574))
|
63,986 | 63,986 | (464,046 | ) | (464,046 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense
(benefit) of ($628) and $4,325) |
(898 | ) | (898 | ) | (1,889 | ) | (1,889 | ) | ||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses) (net of tax expense
(benefit) of $38,950 and ($34,531)) |
44,858 | 44,858 | (53,773 | ) | (53,773 | ) | ||||||||||
Adjustment
related to FSP FAS 115-2 implementation (net
of tax benefit of ($4,921)) |
(6,365 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation (net of tax expense of $271 and $232)
|
503 | 503 | 430 | 430 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
184,816 | (476,586 | ) | |||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(233,130 | ) | (109,034 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains
|
34,091 | 67,838 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,609 | 6,824 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (10,614 | ) | $ | (510,958 | ) | ||||||||||
Add:
preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
9,996 | 9,973 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 580,593 | $ | 70,398 | ||||||||||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 4,869,303 | $ | 4,850,769 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuances in settlement of equity unit purchase
contracts
|
499,934 | - | ||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuances related to stock plans
|
6,028 | 9,712 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
505,962 | 9,712 | ||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - End of period
|
$ | 5,375,265 | $ | 4,860,481 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
29
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Utility
Electric Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 642 | $ | 808 | $ | (166 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
520 | 661 | (141 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
492 | 739 | (247 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
48 | 59 | (11 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
1,702 | 2,267 | (565 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
65 | 108 | (43 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
152 | 149 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,919 | $ | 2,524 | $ | (605 | ) | (24 | ) | |||||||
Utility
Billed Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
7,100 | 7,372 | (272 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
6,518 | 6,688 | (170 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
8,790 | 9,730 | (940 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
577 | 586 | (9 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
22,985 | 24,376 | (1,391 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
1,313 | 1,440 | (127 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
24,298 | 25,816 | (1,518 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
Revenues
|
$ | 545 | $ | 610 | $ | (65 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
|
8,980 | 10,145 | (1,165 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Utility
Electric Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 1,398 | $ | 1,539 | $ | (141 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
1,080 | 1,209 | (129 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,040 | 1,345 | (305 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
101 | 113 | (12 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
3,619 | 4,206 | (587 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
139 | 196 | (57 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
187 | 168 | 19 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 3,945 | $ | 4,570 | $ | (625 | ) | (14 | ) | |||||||
Utility
Billed Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
14,993 | 15,384 | (391 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
12,712 | 12,926 | (214 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
16,929 | 19,107 | (2,178 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
1,139 | 1,155 | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
45,773 | 48,572 | (2,799 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
2,700 | 2,729 | (29 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
48,473 | 51,301 | (2,828 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
Revenues
|
$ | 1,201 | $ | 1,290 | $ | (89 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
|
19,054 | 20,905 | (1,851 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
30
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries
are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before
various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the
ordinary course of business. While management is unable to predict
the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy's
results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition. Entergy
discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K and herein and discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial
statements in the Form 10-K.
Nuclear
Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance
associated with Entergy's nuclear power plants.
Conventional Property
Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy's non-nuclear property insurance
program.
Employment
Litigation
The Registrant Subsidiaries and other
Entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and
federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and
former employees and third parties not selected for open
positions. These actions include, but are not limited to, allegations
of wrongful employment actions; wage disputes and other claims under the Fair
Labor Standards Act or its state counterparts; claims of race, gender and
disability discrimination; disputes arising under collective bargaining
agreements; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative
proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board; claims of retaliation;
and claims for or regarding benefits under various Entergy Corporation sponsored
plans. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are responding to
these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants.
Asbestos
Litigation (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans,
and Entergy Texas)
See Note 8 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation at Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi,
Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas.
Subsequent
Events
Entergy evaluated events of which its
management was aware subsequent to June 30, 2009, through the date that this
quarterly report was issued, August 7, 2009.
NOTE
2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Regulatory
Assets
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets in the Utility
business reflected on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant
Subsidiaries. Following are updates to that discussion.
31
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Fuel
and purchased power cost recovery
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding fuel proceedings involving the
Utility operating companies. Following are updates to that
information.
Entergy
Arkansas
Energy
Cost Recovery Rider
In March 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed
with the APSC its annual energy cost rate for the period April 2009 through
March 2010. The filed energy cost rate decreased from $0.02456/kWh to
$0.01552/kWh. The decrease was caused by the following: 1) all three
of the nuclear power plants from which Entergy Arkansas obtains power, ANO 1 and
2 and Grand Gulf, had refueling outages in 2008, and the previous energy cost
rate had been adjusted to account for the replacement power costs that would be
incurred while these units were down; 2) Entergy Arkansas has a deferred fuel
cost liability from over-recovered fuel costs at December 31, 2008, as compared
to a deferred fuel cost asset from under-recovered fuel costs at December 31,
2007; offset by 3) an increase in the fuel and purchased power prices included
in the calculation.
Entergy
Mississippi
On June 30, 2009, the MPSC issued an
order stating that it may hire an independent audit firm to audit Entergy
Mississippi's fuel adjustment clause or other mechanism directly related to the
purchase of fuel or energy for the period October 2007 through September
2009.
Entergy
Texas
In January 2008, Entergy Texas made a
compliance filing with the PUCT describing how its 2007 Rough Production Cost
Equalization receipts under the System Agreement were allocated between Entergy
Gulf States, Inc.'s Texas and Louisiana jurisdictions. A hearing was
held at the end of July 2008, and in October 2008 the ALJ issued a proposal for
decision recommending an additional $18.6 million allocation to Texas retail
customers. The PUCT adopted the ALJ's proposal for decision in
December 2008. Because the PUCT allocation to Texas retail customers
is inconsistent with the LPSC allocation to Louisiana retail customers, adoption
of the proposal for decision by the PUCT could result in trapped costs between
the Texas and Louisiana jurisdictions with no mechanism for
recovery. The PUCT denied Entergy Texas' motion for rehearing and
Entergy Texas commenced proceedings in both state and federal district courts
seeking to reverse the PUCT's decision. On May 12, 2009, certain
defendants, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the PUCT, filed a
motion to dismiss Entergy Texas' pending complaint before the U.S. District
Court for the Western District of Texas. The federal proceeding,
including a ruling on the motion to dismiss, has been abated pending further
action by the FERC in the proceeding discussed below.
Entergy Texas also filed with the FERC
a proposed amendment to the System Agreement bandwidth formula to specifically
calculate the payments to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.'s rough production cost equalization receipts for
2007. On May 8, 2009, the FERC issued an order rejecting the proposed
amendment, stating, among other things, that the FERC does not have jurisdiction
over the allocation of an individual utility's receipts/payments among or
between its retail jurisdictions and that this was a matter for the courts to
review in the pending proceedings noted above. Because of the FERC's
order, Entergy Texas recorded the effects of the PUCT's allocation of the
additional $18.6 million to retail customers in the second quarter of
2009. On an after-tax basis, the charge to earnings was approximately
$13.0 million (including interest). Entergy requested rehearing of
the FERC's order, and on July 8, 2009, the FERC granted the request for
rehearing for the limited purpose of affording more time for consideration of
Entergy's request.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas filed with
the PUCT a request to refund $46.1 million, including interest, of fuel cost
recovery over-collections through February 2009. Entergy Texas
requested that the proposed refund be made over a four-month period beginning
June 2009. Pursuant to a stipulation among the various parties, in
June 2009 the PUCT issued an order approving a refund of $59.2 million,
including interest, of fuel cost recovery overcollections through March
2009. The refund will be made over a three-month period beginning
July 2009.
32
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Storm
Cost Recovery Filings
Entergy Arkansas Storm
Reserve Accounting
The APSC's June 2007 order in Entergy
Arkansas' base rate proceeding, which is discussed in the Form 10-K, eliminated
storm reserve accounting for Entergy Arkansas. In March 2009 a law
was enacted in Arkansas that requires the APSC to permit storm reserve
accounting for utilities that request it. Entergy Arkansas filed its
request with the APSC, and has reinstated storm reserve accounting effective
January 1, 2009.
Entergy Arkansas January
2009 Ice Storm
In January 2009 a severe ice storm
caused significant damage to Entergy Arkansas' transmission and distribution
lines, equipment, poles, and other facilities. The current cost
estimate for the damage caused by the ice storm is approximately $120 million to
$140 million, of which approximately $65 million to $80 million is estimated to
be operating and maintenance type costs and the remainder is estimated to be
capital investment. On January 30, 2009, the APSC issued an order
inviting and encouraging electric public utilities to file specific proposals
for the recovery of extraordinary storm restoration expenses associated with the
ice storm. Although Entergy Arkansas has not yet filed a proposal for
the method of recovery of its costs, on February 16, 2009, it did file a request
with the APSC for an accounting order authorizing deferral of the operating and
maintenance cost portion of Entergy Arkansas' ice storm restoration costs
pending their recovery. The APSC issued such an order in March 2009
subject to certain conditions, including that if Entergy Arkansas seeks to
recover the deferred costs, those costs will be subject to investigation for
whether they are incremental, prudent, and reasonable. Entergy
Arkansas is still analyzing its options for the method of recovery of the ice
storm restoration costs. One option is securitization, and in April
2009 a law was enacted in Arkansas that authorizes securitization of storm
damage restoration costs.
Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike
Filing
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to portions
of Entergy's service territories in Louisiana in September
2008. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm cost recovery case with the LPSC in May
2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a determination that $150.7
million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and seeks to replenish its
storm reserve in the amount of $90 million. Entergy Louisiana seeks a
determination that $261.9 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $200
million. The storm restoration costs are net of costs that have
already been paid from previously funded storm reserves. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana expect to make a supplemental filing to,
among other things, recommend a recovery method for costs approved by the
LPSC. The parties have agreed to a procedural schedule that includes
March 2010 hearing dates for both the recoverability and the method of recovery
proceedings. Recovery options include traditional base rate recovery,
Louisiana Act 64 (passed in 2006) financing, or Louisiana Act 55 (passed in
2007) financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing.
Entergy Texas Hurricane Ike
and Hurricane Gustav Filing
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to portions
of Entergy's service territory in Texas in September 2008. In April
2009 a law was enacted in Texas that authorizes recovery of these types of costs
by securitization. Entergy Texas filed its storm cost recovery case
in April 2009 seeking a determination that $577.5 million of Hurricane Ike and
Hurricane Gustav restoration costs are recoverable, including estimated costs
for work to be completed. On August 5, 2009, Entergy Texas submitted
to the ALJ an unopposed settlement agreement that will, if approved, resolve all
issues in the storm cost recovery case. Under the terms of the
agreement $566.4 million, plus carrying costs, are eligible for
recovery. In addition, $70 million in anticipated insurance proceeds
will be credited as an offset to the securitized amount, subject to true-up
based on actual proceeds received. Of the $11.1 million
33
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
difference between Entergy Texas' request and the amount
agreed to, which is part of the black box agreement and not directly
attributable to any specific individual issues raised, $6.8 million is
operation and maintenance expense for which Entergy Texas has recorded a charge
in the second quarter 2009. The remaining $4.3 million will be
recorded as utility plant. The PUCT is expected to consider the agreement
at its August 13, 2009, meeting.
On July 16, 2009, Entergy Texas also
made its financing request filing seeking approval to recover its approved
costs, plus carrying costs, by securitization. A prehearing
conference was held on August 4, 2009, and the ALJ ordered a procedural schedule
that includes a September 25, 2009, hearing date.
Retail Rate
Proceedings
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the
Utility operating companies. The following are updates to the Form
10-K.
Filings
with the APSC
Retail
Rates
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the rate filing made by Entergy Arkansas and the proceedings regarding that
filing. On April 23, 2009, the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy
Arkansas' petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision.
On July 2, 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed
a notice with the APSC of its intention to file within 60 to 90 days for a
general change in rates, charges, and tariffs. Entergy Arkansas plans
to file the rate case in September 2009.
Filings
with the LPSC
Retail Rates -
Electric (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Louisiana)
In July 2009 the LPSC issued an order
noting that the LPSC Staff and Entergy are continuing in negotiations that could
result in the recommendation for the adoption of new Formula Rate Plans for
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC Staff will
report to the LPSC on the progress of those negotiations at the LPSC's September
meeting. In the interim Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's and Entergy
Louisiana's base rates will remain unchanged. Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana will both implement previously approved capacity
cost adjustments. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's net increase in
capacity costs of $5 million will be deferred for future
recovery. Entergy Louisiana's net decrease in capacity costs of $17
million will be used to increase the storm reserve accrual.
(Entergy
Louisiana)
In May 2007, Entergy Louisiana made its
formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the 2006 test year, indicating a 7.6%
earned return on common equity. That filing included Entergy
Louisiana's request to recover $39.8 million in unrecovered fixed costs
associated with the loss of customers that resulted from Hurricane Katrina, a
request that was reduced to $31.7 million. In September 2007, Entergy
Louisiana modified its formula rate plan filing to reflect its implementation of
certain adjustments proposed by the LPSC Staff in its review of Entergy
Louisiana's original filing with which Entergy Louisiana agreed, and to reflect
its implementation of an $18.4 million annual formula rate plan increase
comprised of (1) a $23.8 million increase representing 60% of Entergy
Louisiana's revenue deficiency, and (2) a $5.4 million decrease for reduced
incremental and deferred capacity costs. The LPSC authorized Entergy
Louisiana to defer for accounting purposes the difference between its $39.8
million claim, now at $31.7 million, for unrecovered fixed cost and 60% of the
revenue deficiency to preserve Entergy Louisiana's right to pursue that claim in
full during the formula rate plan proceeding. In October 2007,
Entergy Louisiana implemented a $7.1 million formula rate plan
34
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
decrease
that was due primarily to the reclassification of certain franchise fees from
base rates to collection via a line item on customer bills pursuant to an LPSC
Order. The LPSC staff and intervenors recommended disallowance of
certain costs included in Entergy Louisiana's filing. Entergy
Louisiana disagrees with the majority of the proposed disallowances and a
hearing on the disputed issues was held in late-September/early-October
2008. In March 2009 the ALJ issued a proposed recommendation, which
does not allow recovery of the unrecovered fixed costs and also disallows
recovery of all costs associated with Entergy's stock option
plan. Entergy Louisiana has filed exceptions to the ALJ's proposed
recommendation.
Retail Rates - Gas
(Entergy Gulf States Louisiana)
In
January 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate
stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2008. The filing
showed a revenue deficiency of $529 thousand based on a return on common equity
mid-point of 10.5%. In April 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
implemented a $255 thousand rate increase pursuant to an uncontested settlement
with the LPSC staff.
Filings
with the MPSC
In March 2009, Entergy Mississippi made
with the MPSC its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test
year. The filing reported a $27.0 million revenue deficiency and an earned
return on common equity of 7.41%. Entergy Mississippi requested a
$14.5 million increase in annual electric revenues, which is the maximum
increase allowed under the terms of the formula rate plan. The MPSC
issued an order on June 30, 2009, finding that Entergy Mississippi's earned
return was sufficiently below the lower bandwidth limit set by the formula rate
plan to require a $14.5 million increase in annual revenues, effective for bills
rendered on or after June 30, 2009.
In March 2008, Entergy Mississippi made
its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the
MPSC. The filing showed that a $10.1 million increase in annual
electric revenues is warranted. In June 2008, Entergy
Mississippi reached a settlement with the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff
that would result in a $3.8 million rate increase. In January
2009 the MPSC rejected the settlement and left the current rates in
effect. Entergy Mississippi appealed the MPSC's decision to the
Mississippi Supreme Court. After the decision of the MPSC regarding
the formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test year, Entergy Mississippi filed a
motion to dismiss its appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Filings
with the City Council
Retail
Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, on July
31, 2008, Entergy New Orleans filed an electric and gas base rate case with the
City Council. On April 2, 2009, the City Council approved a
comprehensive settlement. The settlement provides for a net $35.3
million reduction in combined fuel and non-fuel revenue requirement, including
conversion of the $10.6 million voluntary recovery credit to a permanent
reduction and complete realignment of Grand Gulf cost recovery from fuel to base
rates, and a $4.95 million gas rate increase, both effective June 1,
2009. A new three-year formula rate plan was also adopted, with terms
including an 11.1% electric return on common equity (ROE) with a +/- 40 basis
point bandwidth and a 10.75% gas ROE with a +/- 50 basis point
bandwidth. Earnings outside the bandwidth reset to the midpoint ROE,
with the difference flowing prospectively to customers or Entergy New Orleans
depending on whether Entergy New Orleans is over- or
under-earning. The formula rate plan also includes a recovery
mechanism for City Council-approved capacity additions, plus provisions for
extraordinary cost changes and force majeure.
Fuel Adjustment Clause
Litigation
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed by a group of ratepayers in
April 1999 against Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
and Entergy Power in state court in Orleans Parish purportedly on behalf of all
Entergy New Orleans ratepayers. In February 2004, the City Council
35
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
approved a resolution that
resulted in a refund to customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during
the months of June through September 2004. In May 2005 the Civil
District Court for the Parish of Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution,
finding no support for the plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be
higher. In June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District
Court decision to the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. On
February 25, 2008, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision
affirming in part, and reversing in part, the Civil District Court's
decision. Although the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal did not reverse any
of the substantive findings and conclusions of the City Council or the Civil
District Court, the Fourth Circuit found that the amount of the refund was
arbitrary and capricious and increased the amount of the refund to $34.3
million. In April 2009 the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision
of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision
of the Civil District Court. On April 17, 2009, the plantiffs requested
rehearing by the Louisiana Supreme Court. On May 29, 2009, the Louisiana
Supreme Court denied the request for rehearing.
Filings
with the PUCT and Texas Cities (Entergy Texas)
Retail
Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
Texas made a rate filing in September 2007 with the PUCT requesting an annual
rate increase totaling $107.5 million, including a base rate increase of $64.3
million and riders totaling $43.2 million. On December 16, 2008,
Entergy Texas filed a term sheet that reflected a settlement agreement that
included the PUCT Staff and the other active participants in the rate
case. On December 19, 2008, the ALJs approved Entergy Texas' request
to implement interim rates reflecting the agreement. The agreement
includes a $46.7 million base rate increase, among other
provisions. Under the ALJs' interim order, Entergy Texas implemented
interim rates, subject to refund and surcharge, reflecting the rates established
through the settlement. These rates became effective with bills
rendered on and after January 28, 2009, for usage on and after December 19,
2008. In addition, the existing recovery mechanism for incremental
purchased power capacity costs ceased as of January 28, 2009, with purchased
power capacity costs then subsumed within the base rates set in this
proceeding. Certain Texas municipalities exercised their original
jurisdiction and took final action to approve rates consistent with the interim
rates approved by the ALJs. In March 2009, the PUCT approved the
settlement, which made the interim rates final, and this PUCT decision is now
final and non-appealable.
Electric Industry
Restructuring in Texas
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of electric restructuring activity that
involves Entergy Texas. In June 2009, a law was enacted in Texas that
requires Entergy Texas to cease all activities relating to Entergy Texas'
transition to competition. The law allows Entergy Texas to remain a
part of the SERC Region, although it does not prevent Entergy Texas from joining
the Southwest Power Pool. The law provides that any further
proceedings to certify a power region that Entergy Texas belongs to as a
qualified power region can be initiated by the PUCT, or on motion by another
party, when the conditions supporting such a proceeding exist. Under
the new law, the PUCT may not approve a transition to competition plan for
Entergy Texas until the expiration of four years from the PUCT's certification
of Entergy Texas' power region. In response to the new law, Entergy
Texas in June 2009 gave notice to the PUCT of the withdrawal of its transition
to competition plan, and requested that its transition to competition proceeding
be dismissed. In July 2009 the ALJ dismissed the
proceeding.
The new law also contains provisions
that allow Entergy Texas to be included in a cost recovery mechanism that
permits annual filings for the recovery of reasonable and necessary expenditures
for transmission infrastructure improvement and changes in wholesale
transmission charges. This mechanism was previously available to
other non-ERCOT Texas utility companies, but not to Entergy Texas.
The new law further amends already
existing law that had required Entergy Texas to propose for PUCT approval a
tariff to allow eligible customers the ability to contract for competitive
generation. The amending language in the new law provides, among
other things, that: 1) the tariff shall not be implemented in a
manner that harms the sustainability or competitiveness of manufacturers who
choose not to participate in the tariff; 2) Entergy Texas shall "purchase
competitive generation service, selected by the customer, and provide the
generation at retail to the customer" and 3) Entergy Texas shall
provide and price transmission service and ancillary
36
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
services
under that tariff at a rate that is unbundled from its cost of
service. The new law directs that the PUCT may not issue
an order on the tariff that is contrary to an applicable decision, rule, or
policy statement of a federal regulatory agency having
jurisdiction. Entergy Texas has thus far not made a filing with the
PUCT in response to the newly adopted law addressing the tariff. The
new law provides that the PUCT shall approve, reject, or modify the proposed
tariff not later than September 1, 2010.
NOTE
3. EQUITY
Common
Stock
Common
Stock Issuances
In
February 2009, Entergy Corporation was unable to remarket successfully $500
million of notes associated with its equity units. The note holders
therefore put the notes to Entergy, Entergy retired the notes, and Entergy
issued 6,598,000 shares of common stock to the note holders.
Earnings
per Share
The following tables present Entergy's
basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated
income statement:
For
the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
(In
Millions, Except Per Share Data)
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
|
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
$226.8
|
196.1
|
$1.16
|
$271.0
|
191.3
|
$1.42
|
|
Average
dilutive effect of:
|
|||||||
Stock options
|
-
|
2.1
|
(0.012)
|
-
|
5.0
|
(0.036)
|
|
Equity units
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1.6
|
(0.011)
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$226.8
|
198.2
|
$1.14
|
$271.0
|
197.9
|
$1.37
|
|
For
the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
(In
Millions, Except Per Share Data)
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
|
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
$462.1
|
194.4
|
$2.38
|
$579.7
|
192.0
|
$3.02
|
|
Average
dilutive effect of:
|
|||||||
Stock options
|
-
|
2.1
|
(0.025)
|
-
|
4.8
|
(0.073)
|
|
Equity units
|
$3.2
|
1.7
|
(0.005)
|
-
|
1.3
|
(0.021)
|
|
Deferred units
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(0.001)
|
||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$465.3
|
198.2
|
$2.35
|
$579.7
|
198.1
|
$2.93
|
|
Entergy's
stock option and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 12 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K.
37
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Treasury
Stock
During the six months ended June 30,
2009, Entergy Corporation issued 166,334 shares of its previously repurchased
common stock to satisfy stock option exercises and other stock-based
awards.
Retained
Earnings
On July 31, 2009, Entergy Corporation's
Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.75 per share, payable
on September 1, 2009 to holders of record as of August 12, 2009.
Presentation of
Non-Controlling Interests
In 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160,
"Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of
ARB No. 51," which requires generally that the ownership interests in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent (non-controlling interests)
be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the consolidated balance sheet
within equity, but separate from the parent's equity, and that the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling
interests be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
income statement. SFAS 160 became effective for Entergy in the first
quarter of 2009 and applies to preferred securities issued by Entergy
subsidiaries to third parties.
Presentation of Preferred
Stock without Sinking Fund
In connection with the adoption of SFAS
160 Entergy evaluated the requirements of EITF Topic No. 98, Classification and
Measurement of Redeemable Securities (Topic D-98). Topic D-98
requires the classification of securities between liabilities and shareholders'
equity if the holders of those securities have protective rights that allow them
to gain control of the board of directors in certain
circumstances. These rights would have the effect of giving the
holders the ability to potentially redeem their securities, even if the
likelihood of occurrence of these circumstances is considered
remote. The Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi and Entergy New
Orleans articles of incorporation provide, generally, that the holders of each
company's preferred securities may elect a majority of the respective company's
board of directors if dividends are not paid for a year, until such time as the
dividends in arrears are paid. In accordance with Topic D-98, Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi and Entergy New Orleans present their preferred
securities outstanding between liabilities and shareholders'
equity. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, both
organized as limited liability companies, have outstanding preferred securities
with similar protective rights with respect to unpaid dividends, but provide for
the election of board members that would not constitute a majority of the board;
and their preferred securities are therefore classified for all periods
presented as a component of members' equity in accordance with SFAS
160.
The outstanding preferred securities of
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Asset
Management (whose preferred holders also have protective rights as described in
Note 6 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K) are similarly presented
between liabilities and shareholders' equity in Entergy's consolidated financial
statements and the outstanding preferred securities of Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are presented within total equity in Entergy's
consolidated financial statements. The preferred dividends paid by
all subsidiaries are reflected for all periods presented outside of consolidated
net income in accordance with SFAS 160. The accompanying financial
statements do not separately reconcile the beginning and ending balances of
preferred securities because there is not a significant net change in the
balance of the securities between periods.
NOTE
4. LINES OF CREDIT, RELATED SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM
DEBT
Entergy Corporation has in place a
credit facility that expires in August 2012 and has a borrowing capacity of $3.5
billion. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of
credit against the total borrowing capacity of the credit
facility. The facility fee is currently 0.09% of the commitment
amount. Facility fees and interest rates on loans under the credit
facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy
Corporation. The weighted average interest
38
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
rate as
of June 30, 2009 was 1.597% on the drawn portion of the
facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and
capacity available under the facility as of June 30, 2009.
Capacity
|
Borrowings
|
Letters
of
Credit
|
Capacity
Available
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
$3,500
|
$2,435
|
$28
|
$1,037
|
Entergy
Corporation's facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65%
or less of its total capitalization. Entergy is in compliance with
this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy or
one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on
other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an
acceleration of the facility maturity date may occur.
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy Texas each had
credit facilities available as of June 30, 2009 as follows:
Company
|
Expiration Date |
Amount
of
Facility
|
Interest
Rate (a)
|
Amount
Drawn as of June 30, 2009
|
||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
April
2010
|
$88
million (b)
|
5.0%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
August
2012
|
$100
million (c)
|
0.785%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
August
2012
|
$200
million (d)
|
0.72%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
May
2010
|
$35
million (e)
|
2.06%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
May
2010
|
$25
million (e)
|
2.06%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Texas
|
August
2012
|
$100
million (f)
|
0.785%
|
-
|
(a)
|
The
interest rate is the weighted average interest rate as of June 30, 2009
that would be applied to the outstanding borrowings under the
facility.
|
(b)
|
The
credit facility requires Entergy Arkansas to maintain a debt ratio of 65%
or less of its total capitalization and contains an interest rate floor of
5%. Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may
be secured by a security interest in its accounts
receivable.
|
(c)
|
The
credit facility allows Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to issue letters of
credit against the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
June 30, 2009, no letters of credit were outstanding. The
credit facility requires Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to maintain a
consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total
capitalization. Pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement,
the amount of debt assumed by Entergy Texas ($699 million as of June 30,
2009 and $770 million as of December 31, 2008) is excluded from debt and
capitalization in calculating the debt ratio.
|
(d)
|
The
credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit
against the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of June 30,
2009, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit
facility requires Entergy Louisiana to maintain a consolidated debt ratio
of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
|
(e)
|
Borrowings
under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a
security interest in its accounts receivable. Entergy
Mississippi is required to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or
less of its total capitalization.
|
(f)
|
The
credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against
the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of June 30, 2009, no
letters of credit were outstanding. The credit facility
requires Entergy Texas to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or
less of its total capitalization. Pursuant to the terms of the
credit agreement, the transition bonds issued by Entergy Gulf States
Reconstruction Funding I, LLC, a subsidiary of Entergy Texas, are excluded
from debt and capitalization in calculating the debt
ratio.
|
The
facility fees on the credit facilities range from 0.09% to 0.15% of the
commitment amount.
39
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries and certain other Entergy
subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC. The
current FERC-authorized limits are effective through March 31, 2010 (except
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas, which are effective through
November 8, 2009). In addition to borrowings from commercial banks,
these companies are authorized under a FERC order to borrow from the Entergy
System money pool. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing
arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' dependence on external
short-term borrowings. Borrowings from the money
pool and external borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized
limits. As of June 30, 2009, Entergy's subsidiaries' aggregate money
pool and external short-term borrowings authorized limit was $2.2 billion, the
aggregate outstanding borrowing from the money pool was $415 million, and
Entergy's subsidiaries had no outstanding short-term borrowing from external
sources.
The
following are the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the
outstanding short-term borrowings (aggregating both money pool and external
short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries as of June 30,
2009:
Authorized
|
Borrowings
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
$250
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
$200
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
$250
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
$175
|
-
|
||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
$100
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Texas
|
$200
|
-
|
||
System
Energy (a)
|
$200
|
-
|
(a) In
May 2009, 364-day letters of credit in the aggregate amount of approximately
$179 million were issued pursuant to System Energy's short-term borrowing
authority to the owner participants in System Energy's 1988 sale and leaseback
of interests in Grand Gulf.
Entergy
Texas Note Payable to Entergy Corporation
In December 2008, Entergy Texas
borrowed $160 million from its parent company, Entergy Corporation, under a $300
million revolving credit facility pursuant to an Inter-Company Credit Agreement
between Entergy Corporation and Entergy Texas. The note had a
December 3, 2013 maturity date. Entergy Texas used the proceeds,
together with other available corporate funds, to pay at maturity the portion of
the $350 million Floating Rate series of First Mortgage Bonds due December 2008
that had been assumed by Entergy Texas, and that bond series is no longer
outstanding. In January 2009, Entergy Texas repaid its $160 million
note payable to Entergy Corporation with the proceeds from the bond issuance
discussed below.
Debt
Issuances
(Entergy
Mississippi)
In June 2009, Entergy Mississippi
issued $150 million of 6.64% Series First Mortgage Bonds due July
2019. Entergy Mississippi used the proceeds to repay outstanding
borrowings on its credit facilities, to repay short-term borrowings under the
Entergy System money pool, and for other general corporate
purposes.
(Entergy
Texas)
In January 2009, Entergy Texas issued
$500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds due February 2019. Entergy Texas
used a portion of the proceeds to repay its $160 million note payable to Entergy
Corporation, to repay the $100 million outstanding on its credit facility, to
repay short-term borrowings under the Entergy System money pool, and to repay
prior to maturity the following obligations that had been assumed by Entergy
Texas under the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana:
40
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Governmental
Bonds share assumed under debt assumption agreement:
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
||
6.75%
Series due 2012, Calcasieu Parish
|
$22,115
|
|
6.7%
Series due 2013, Point Coupee Parish
|
$7,990
|
|
7.0%
Series due 2015, West Feliciana Parish
|
$22,400
|
|
6.6%
Series due 2028, West Feliciana Parish
|
$18,320
|
Entergy
Texas used the remaining proceeds for other general corporate
purposes.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas issued $150
million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds due June 2039. Entergy Texas
intends to use the proceeds to repay on or prior to maturity $100,509,000 of the
Floating Rate Series Mortgage Bonds due December 2009 that had been assumed by
Entergy Texas under the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and for other general corporate purposes. A portion of the
net proceeds were used to repay borrowings from the Entergy System money pool
and invested in temporary cash investments and the Entergy System money
pool.
Fair
Value
In the second quarter 2009, Entergy
adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments" (FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB
28-1 relates to fair value disclosures for all financial instruments not
measured on the balance sheet at fair value, and requires these disclosures on a
quarterly basis. The book value and the fair value of the long-term
debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009
are as follows:
Book
Value
of
Long-Term Debt (a)
|
Fair
Value
of
Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Entergy
|
$10,101,963
|
$10,096,781
|
||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
$1,437,814
|
$1,430,055
|
||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
$1,976,642
|
$1,960,959
|
||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
$1,139,764
|
$1,170,861
|
||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
$845,267
|
$834,847
|
||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
$198,019
|
$188,392
|
||
Entergy
Texas
|
$1,651,379
|
$1,681,609
|
||
System
Energy
|
$478,074
|
$445,194
|
(a)
|
The
values exclude lease obligations of $241 million at Entergy Louisiana and
$267 million at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of $181 million
at Entergy Arkansas, and the note payable to NYPA of $200 million at
Entergy, and include debt due within one
year.
|
(b)
|
The
fair value is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and
by nationally recognized investment banking
firms.
|
41
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
NOTE
5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Entergy grants stock options, which are
described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K. Awards under Entergy's plans generally vest over three
years.
The
following table includes financial information for stock options for the second
quarter and six months ended June 30 for each of the years
presented:
2009
|
2008
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
|||
Compensation
expense included in Entergy's Net Income for the second
quarter
|
$4.2
|
$4.7
|
|
Tax
benefit recognized in Entergy's Net Income for the second
quarter
|
$1.6
|
$1.8
|
|
Compensation
expense included in Entergy's Net Income for the six months ended June
30,
|
$8.5
|
$9.1
|
|
Tax
benefit recognized in Entergy's Net Income for the six months ended June
30,
|
$3.3
|
$3.5
|
|
Compensation
cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory as of June
30,
|
$1.6
|
$1.7
|
Entergy granted 1,084,800 stock options
during the first quarter 2009 with a weighted-average fair value of
$12.47. At June 30, 2009, there were 12,028,511 stock options
outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $67.65. The
aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding at June 30, 2009 was
$118.7 million.
NOTE
6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Components of Net Pension
Cost
Entergy's
qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters
of 2009 and 2008, included the following components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$22,412
|
$22,598
|
||
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligation
|
54,543
|
51,646
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(62,305)
|
(57,640)
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
1,249
|
1,266
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
5,600
|
6,482
|
||
Net
pension costs
|
$21,499
|
$24,352
|
Entergy's
qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$44,824
|
$45,196
|
||
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligation
|
109,086
|
103,293
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(124,610)
|
(115,279)
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
2,498
|
2,532
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
11,200
|
13,416
|
||
Net
pension costs
|
$42,998
|
$49,158
|
42
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized,
for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$3,400
|
$1,748
|
$1,974
|
$995
|
$425
|
$917
|
$880
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||
benefit
obligation
|
11,761
|
5,279
|
6,940
|
3,676
|
1,470
|
3,935
|
2,139
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(12,187)
|
(7,516)
|
(8,197)
|
(4,236)
|
(1,815)
|
(5,185)
|
(2,766)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
212
|
110
|
119
|
85
|
52
|
80
|
9
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
1,764
|
79
|
703
|
324
|
305
|
43
|
109
|
|||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$4,950
|
($300)
|
$1,539
|
$844
|
$437
|
($210)
|
$371
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$3,584
|
$1,841
|
$2,058
|
$1,063
|
$445
|
$968
|
$930
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||
benefit
obligation
|
11,616
|
5,047
|
6,784
|
3,627
|
1,415
|
3,882
|
1,937
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(11,765)
|
(7,165)
|
(8,134)
|
(4,075)
|
(1,839)
|
(5,047)
|
(2,452)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
223
|
110
|
119
|
90
|
52
|
80
|
9
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
2,303
|
115
|
920
|
485
|
319
|
156
|
90
|
|||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$5,961
|
($52)
|
$1,747
|
$1,190
|
$392
|
$39
|
$514
|
43
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized,
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$6,800
|
$3,496
|
$3,948
|
$1,990
|
$850
|
$1,834
|
$1,760
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||
benefit
obligation
|
23,522
|
10,558
|
13,880
|
7,352
|
2,940
|
7,870
|
4,278
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(24,374)
|
(15,032)
|
(16,394)
|
(8,472)
|
(3,630)
|
(10,370)
|
(5,532)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
424
|
220
|
238
|
170
|
104
|
160
|
18
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
3,528
|
158
|
1,406
|
648
|
610
|
86
|
218
|
|||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$9,900
|
($600)
|
$3,078
|
$1,688
|
$874
|
($420)
|
$742
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$7,168
|
$3,682
|
$4,116
|
$2,126
|
$890
|
$1,936
|
$1,860
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||
benefit
obligation
|
23,232
|
10,094
|
13,568
|
7,254
|
2,830
|
7,764
|
3,874
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(23,530)
|
(14,330)
|
(16,268)
|
(8,150)
|
(3,678)
|
(10,094)
|
(4,904)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
446
|
220
|
238
|
180
|
104
|
160
|
18
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
4,606
|
230
|
1,840
|
970
|
638
|
312
|
180
|
|||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$11,922
|
($104)
|
$3,494
|
$2,380
|
$784
|
$78
|
$1,028
|
Entergy recognized $4.4 million and $4.3 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Entergy recognized $8.8 million and $8.5 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized
the following pension cost for their non-qualified pension plans in the second
quarters of 2009 and 2008:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
|||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost
Second
Quarter 2009
|
$99
|
$97
|
$6
|
$43
|
$20
|
$185
|
||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost
Second
Quarter 2008
|
$133
|
$78
|
$7
|
$54
|
$12
|
$227
|
44
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their
non-qualified pension plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
|||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost Six
Months
Ended June 30, 2009
|
$198
|
$194
|
$12
|
$86
|
$40
|
$370
|
||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost Six
Months
Ended June 30, 2008
|
$266
|
$156
|
$14
|
$108
|
$24
|
$454
|
Components of Net Other
Postretirement Benefit Cost
Entergy's other postretirement benefit
cost, including amounts capitalized, for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008,
included the following components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$11,691
|
$11,800
|
||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
18,816
|
17,824
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(5,871)
|
(7,027)
|
||
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
933
|
957
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(4,024)
|
(4,104)
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
4,743
|
3,890
|
||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$26,288
|
$23,340
|
Entergy's
other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$23,382
|
$23,600
|
||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
37,632
|
35,648
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(11,742)
|
(14,054)
|
||
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
1,866
|
1,914
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(8,048)
|
(8,208)
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
9,486
|
7,780
|
||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$52,576
|
$46,680
|
45
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts
capitalized, for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$1,765
|
$1,196
|
$1,147
|
$530
|
$311
|
$619
|
$513
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
3,759
|
2,005
|
2,297
|
1,173
|
967
|
1,490
|
605
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(2,143)
|
-
|
-
|
(757)
|
(684)
|
(1,556)
|
(414)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
205
|
60
|
96
|
88
|
416
|
66
|
2
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(197)
|
(77)
|
117
|
(62)
|
90
|
19
|
(245)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
2,087
|
494
|
553
|
657
|
381
|
799
|
320
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$5,476
|
$3,678
|
$4,210
|
$1,629
|
$1,481
|
$1,437
|
$781
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$1,706
|
$1,251
|
$1,099
|
$514
|
$295
|
$606
|
$513
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
3,443
|
1,917
|
2,187
|
1,141
|
953
|
1,440
|
531
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(2,492)
|
-
|
-
|
(905)
|
(789)
|
(1,885)
|
(511)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
205
|
84
|
96
|
88
|
415
|
66
|
2
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(197)
|
146
|
117
|
(62)
|
90
|
72
|
(283)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
1,440
|
494
|
677
|
534
|
291
|
357
|
177
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$4,105
|
$3,892
|
$4,176
|
$1,310
|
$1,255
|
$656
|
$429
|
46
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts
capitalized, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, included the
following components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$3,530
|
$2,392
|
$2,294
|
$1,060
|
$622
|
$1,238
|
$1,026
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
7,518
|
4,010
|
4,594
|
2,346
|
1,934
|
2,980
|
1,210
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(4,286)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,514)
|
(1,368)
|
(3,112)
|
(828)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
410
|
120
|
192
|
176
|
832
|
132
|
4
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(394)
|
(154)
|
234
|
(124)
|
180
|
38
|
(490)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
4,174
|
988
|
1,106
|
1,314
|
762
|
1,598
|
640
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$10,952
|
$7,356
|
$8,420
|
$3,258
|
$2,962
|
$2,874
|
$1,562
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$3,412
|
$2,502
|
$2,198
|
$1,028
|
$590
|
$1,212
|
$1,026
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
6,886
|
3,834
|
4,374
|
2,282
|
1,906
|
2,880
|
1,062
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(4,984)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,810)
|
(1,578)
|
(3,770)
|
(1,022)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
410
|
168
|
192
|
176
|
830
|
132
|
4
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(394)
|
292
|
234
|
(124)
|
180
|
144
|
(566)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
2,880
|
988
|
1,354
|
1,068
|
582
|
714
|
354
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$8,210
|
$7,784
|
$8,352
|
$2,620
|
$2,510
|
$1,312
|
$858
|
Employer Contributions
Based on current assumptions, Entergy
expects to contribute $132 million to its qualified pension plans in
2009. Guidance pursuant to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 rules,
effective for the 2009 plan year and beyond, may affect the level of Entergy's
pension contributions in the future. As of the end of July 2009,
Entergy had contributed $95 million to its pension plans. Therefore,
Entergy presently anticipates contributing an additional $37 million to fund its
qualified pension plans in 2009.
47
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Based on
current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the
following to qualified pension plans in 2009:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Expected
2009 pension
contributions
|
$24,635
|
$6,279
|
$7,623
|
$5,806
|
$1,107
|
$3,577
|
$4,734
|
|||||||
Pension
contributions made
through
July 2009
|
$16,194
|
$3,428
|
$4,370
|
$3,731
|
$509
|
$2,325
|
$3,226
|
|||||||
Remaining
estimated pension
contributions
to be made in 2009
|
$8,441
|
$2,851
|
$3,253
|
$2,075
|
$598
|
$1,252
|
$1,508
|
Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Medicare Act)
Based on actuarial analysis, the
estimated impact of future Medicare subsidies reduced the December 31, 2008
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO) by $187 million, and
reduced the second quarter 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost by
$6.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively. It reduced the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost by $12.0
million and $12.4 million, respectively. In the second quarter 2009,
Entergy received $0.1 million in Medicare subsidies for prescription drug
claims. In the six months ended June 30, 2009, Entergy received $1.1
million in Medicare subsidies for prescription drug claims.
Based on actuarial analysis, the
estimated impact of future Medicare subsidies reduced the December 31, 2008 APBO
and the second quarters 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost and the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost for
the Registrant Subsidiaries as follows:
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
|||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
New
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Reduction
in 12/31/2008 APBO
|
($40,610)
|
($19,650)
|
($22,222)
|
($13,280)
|
($9,135)
|
($14,961)
|
($6,628)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in second quarter 2009
|
||||||||||||||
other
postretirement benefit cost
|
($1,235)
|
($814)
|
($695)
|
($391)
|
($261)
|
($240)
|
($231)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in second quarter 2008
|
||||||||||||||
other
postretirement benefit cost
|
($1,266)
|
($876)
|
($706)
|
($406)
|
($279)
|
($263)
|
($236)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in six months ended
|
||||||||||||||
June
30, 2009 other
|
||||||||||||||
postretirement
benefit cost
|
($2,470)
|
($1,628)
|
($1,390)
|
($782)
|
($522)
|
($480)
|
($462)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in six months ended
|
||||||||||||||
June
30, 2008 other
|
||||||||||||||
postretirement
benefit cost
|
($2,532)
|
($1,752)
|
($1,412)
|
($812)
|
($558)
|
($526)
|
($472)
|
|||||||
Medicare
subsidies received in the
|
||||||||||||||
second
quarter 2009
|
$30
|
$18
|
$19
|
$11
|
$11
|
$14
|
$2
|
|||||||
Medicare
subsidies received in the
|
||||||||||||||
six
months ended June 30, 2009
|
$256
|
$162
|
$168
|
$84
|
$97
|
$105
|
$25
|
For further information on the Medicare
Act refer to Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
48
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
NOTE
7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Entergy
Corporation
Entergy's reportable segments as of
June 30, 2009 are Utility and Non-Utility Nuclear. Utility generates,
transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of Arkansas,
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and provides natural gas utility service in
portions of Louisiana. Non-Utility Nuclear owns and operates six
nuclear power plants and is primarily focused on selling electric power produced
by those plants to wholesale customers. "All Other" includes the
parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity, including the
non-nuclear wholesale assets business, and earnings on the proceeds of sales of
previously-owned businesses.
Entergy's
segment financial information for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear*
|
All
Other*
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||
2009
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$1,947,831
|
$544,929
|
$34,589
|
($6,560)
|
$2,520,789
|
||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated equity affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,369
|
$-
|
$1,369
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$104,700
|
$35,959
|
($50,018)
|
$-
|
$90,641
|
||||
Consolidated
net income
|
$151,575
|
$80,211
|
$18,384
|
($18,359)
|
$231,811
|
||||
2008
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$2,579,303
|
$609,730
|
$82,088
|
($6,850)
|
$3,264,271
|
||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated
|
|||||||||
equity
affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
($2,572)
|
$-
|
($2,572)
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$112,421
|
$83,902
|
($13,311)
|
$-
|
$183,012
|
||||
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
$164,023
|
$143,616
|
($31,710)
|
$-
|
$275,929
|
Entergy's segment financial information
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear*
|
All
Other*
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||
2009
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$4,050,037
|
$1,201,116
|
$72,331
|
($13,583)
|
$5,309,901
|
||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated
|
|||||||||
equity
affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
($1,758)
|
$-
|
($1,758)
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$178,163
|
$138,036
|
($62,513)
|
$-
|
$253,686
|
||||
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
$267,544
|
$261,092
|
($19,774)
|
($36,718)
|
$472,144
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$29,010,123
|
$8,316,584
|
$1,162,840
|
($2,004,327)
|
$36,485,220
|
||||
2008
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$4,715,633
|
$1,290,215
|
$136,889
|
($13,732)
|
$6,129,005
|
||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated
|
|||||||||
equity
affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
($3,501)
|
$-
|
($3,501)
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$196,664
|
$208,875
|
($29,524)
|
$-
|
$376,015
|
||||
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
$285,503
|
$365,314
|
($61,141)
|
$-
|
$589,676
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$26,807,661
|
$7,326,735
|
$1,984,560
|
($1,425,615)
|
$34,693,341
|
49
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Businesses
marked with * are sometimes referred to as the "competitive businesses," with
the exception of the parent company, Entergy
Corporation. Eliminations are primarily intersegment
activity. Almost all of Entergy's goodwill is related to the Utility
segment.
Registrant
Subsidiaries
The Registrant Subsidiaries have one
reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System
Energy, which is an electricity generation business. The Registrant
Subsidiaries' operations are managed on an integrated basis because of the
substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business
process, cost structures, and operating results.
NOTE
8. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES
Market
and Commodity Risks
In the
normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market and
commodity risks. Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may
incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular
instrument or commodity. All financial and commodity-related
instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market
risk. Entergy is subject to a number of commodity and market risks,
including:
Type
of Risk
|
Affected
Businesses
|
|
Power
price risk
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear, Non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
|
Fuel
price risk
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear, Non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange rate risk
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear, Non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
|
Equity
price and interest rate risk - investments
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear
|
Entergy
manages a portion of these risks using derivative instruments, some of which are
classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions
while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sales transactions due to
their physical settlement provisions. Normal purchase/normal sale
risk management tools include long-term power purchase and sales agreements and
fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling
agreements. Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural
gas and electricity futures, forwards, swaps, and options; foreign currency
forwards; and interest rate swaps. Entergy enters into derivatives
only to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or
liabilities.
Entergy
manages fuel price risk for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi
primarily through the purchase of short-term swaps. These swaps are
marked-to-market with offsetting regulatory assets or
liabilities. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a
portion of projected annual purchases of gas for electric generation and
projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
and Entergy New Orleans.
Entergy's
exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the
size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as
market volatility and liquidity. For instruments such as options, the
time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship
between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option's
contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market
risk. A significant factor influencing the overall level of market
risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate
such risk. Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring
compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the
effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies. Entergy's risk
management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net
exposure during the stated periods. These policies, including related
risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given
Entergy's objectives.
50
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Hedging
Derivatives
Effective January 1, 2009, Entergy
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 "Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133" (SFAS 161), which requires enhanced disclosures about an entity's
derivative and hedging activities. The fair values of Entergy's
derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 are
as follows:
Instrument
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Business
|
|||
Derivatives
designated as hedging instruments under FASB 133
|
||||||
Assets:
|
||||||
Electricity
futures, forwards, and swaps
|
Prepayments
and other (current portion)
|
$208
million
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
|||
Electricity
futures, forwards, and swaps
|
Other
deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
|
$105
million
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
|||
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under FASB 133
|
||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||
Natural
gas futures,
forwards,
and swaps
|
Other
current liabilities
|
$53
million
|
Utility
|
The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated statements of
income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Instrument
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion)
|
Statement
of Income location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective
portion)
|
|||
Electricity
futures, forwards,
and
swaps
|
$36
million
|
Competitive
businesses operating revenues
|
$76
million
|
|||
The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated statements of
income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Instrument
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion)
|
Statement
of Income location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective
portion)
|
|||
Electricity
futures, forwards,
and
swaps
|
$237
million
|
Competitive
businesses operating revenues
|
$133
million
|
|||
51
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Electricity
over-the-counter swaps that financially settle against day-ahead power pool
prices are used to manage price exposure for Non-Utility Nuclear
generation. Based on market prices as of June 30, 2009, cash flow
hedges relating to power sales totaled $313 million of gross gains, of which
approximately $208 million are expected to be reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income (OCI) to operating revenues in the next twelve
months. The actual amount reclassified from accumulated OCI, however,
could vary due to future changes in market prices. Gains totaling
approximately $76 million and $133 million were realized on the maturity of cash
flow hedges for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Unrealized gains or losses
recorded in OCI result from hedging power output at the Non-Utility Nuclear
power plants. The related gains or losses from hedging power are
included in operating revenues when realized. The maximum length of
time over which Entergy is currently hedging the variability in future cash
flows for forecasted power transactions at June 30, 2009 is approximately four
years. Planned generation sold forward from Non-Utility Nuclear power
plants as of June 30, 2009 is 87% for the remaining two quarters of 2009 of
which approximately one-third is sold under financial hedges and the remainder
under normal purchase/sale contracts. The ineffective portion of the
change in the value of Entergy's cash flow hedges during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was insignificant. Credit support
for these power cash flow hedges are covered by diverse master agreements, some
of which require collateralization based on mark-to-market value while others do
not require such collateralization. As of June 30, 2009, Non-Utility
Nuclear was not required to post any collateral due to the fact that these cash
flow hedges were in-the-money and were thus recorded as assets.
Natural gas over-the-counter swaps that
financially settle against NYMEX futures are used to manage fuel price risk for
the Utility's Louisiana and Mississippi customers. All benefits or
costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The total volume of
natural gas swaps outstanding as of June 30, 2009 is 37,490,000 MMBtu for
Entergy, 9,180,000 MMBtu for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, 15,290,000 MMBtu for
Entergy Louisiana, 9,150,000 MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi, and 3,870,000 for
Entergy New Orleans. Credit support for these natural gas swaps are
covered by master agreements that do not require collateralization based on
mark-to-market value but do carry material adverse change clauses that may lead
to collateralization requests. The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements
of income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss)
recorded
in income
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$38
million
|
The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements
of income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is as follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss)
recorded
in income
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$14
million
|
Due to
regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked to market through fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are
simultaneously reversed and recorded as offsetting regulatory assets or
liabilities.
52
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
values of the Registrant Subsidiaries' derivative instruments in their balance
sheets as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:
Instrument
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Registrant
|
||||||||
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under FASB 133
|
|||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$12.2
million
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
||||||||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$23.5
million
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
||||||||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$15.4
million
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
||||||||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Other
current liabilities
|
$1.6
million
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
The effects
of the Registrant Subsidiaries' derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments on their statements of income for the three months ended June 30,
2009 are as follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recorded in income
|
Registrant
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$10.7
million
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$16.4
million
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$11.6
million
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($0.3)
million
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
The effects of the Registrant
Subsidiaries' derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on
their statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are as
follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recorded in income
|
Registrant
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$8.0
million
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$3.2
million
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$0.2
million
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
$2.7
million
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
53
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Fair
Values
The estimated fair values of Entergy's
financial instruments and derivatives are determined using bid prices and market
quotes. Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates
of fair value. Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of
the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market
exchange. Gains or losses realized on financial instruments held by
regulated businesses may be reflected in future rates and therefore do not
accrue to the benefit or detriment of shareholders. Entergy considers
the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets
and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the
short maturity of these instruments. Effective January 1, 2008,
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (SFAS 157), which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
generally does not require any new fair value measurements. However,
in some cases, the application of SFAS 157 in the future may change Entergy's
and the Registrant Subsidiaries' practice for measuring and disclosing fair
values under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as an exit
price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that
would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
knowledgeable market participants at date of measurement. Entergy and
the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market
participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair
value. The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market
data, or generally unobservable. Entergy and the Registrant
Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair
value.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an
active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for
unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined
in SFAS 157 are as follows:
·
|
Level
1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions
for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to
provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1
primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents,
debt instruments, and gas hedge
contracts.
|
·
|
Level
2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1
that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or
liability at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs include the
following:
|
-
|
quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets;
|
-
|
quoted
prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive
markets;
|
-
|
inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability;
or
|
-
|
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
Level 2
consists primarily of individually owned debt instruments or shares in common
trusts.
·
|
Level
3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable
or unobservable from objective sources. These inputs are used
with internally developed methodologies to produce management's best
estimate of fair value for the asset or liability. Level 3
consists primarily of derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges
of power sales at merchant power
plants.
|
The
values for the cash flow hedges that are recorded as derivative contract assets
or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market
prices and unobservable inputs such as model-generated prices for longer-term
markets and are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The
amounts reflected as the fair value of derivative assets or liabilities are
based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance
sheet date (treated as an asset) or
54
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and
would equal the estimated amount receivable or payable by Entergy if the
contracts were settled at that date. These derivative contracts
include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of
the output from Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear business. The fair
values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract
prices and the floating prices determined each period from a combination of
quoted forward power market prices for the period for which such curves are
available, and model-generated prices using quoted forward gas market curves and
estimates regarding heat rates to convert gas to power and the costs associated
with the transportation of the power from the plants' bus bar to the contract's
point of delivery, generally a power market hub, for the period
thereafter. The difference between the fixed price in the swap
contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in
the contract and discounted at the counterparties' credit adjusted risk free
rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities. All
of the $313 million of cash flow hedges at June 30, 2009 are in-the-money
contracts with counterparties who are all currently investment
grade.
Effective
January 1, 2009, Entergy adopted FSP No. FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When
the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (FSP 157-4), which
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS
157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset and liability have
significantly decreased and includes guidance on identifying circumstances that
indicate a transaction is not orderly. The adoption of FSP 157-4 had no
impact on net income or total equity.
The
following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy established
by SFAS 157, Entergy's assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair
value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009. The assessment of the
significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment
and may affect their placement within the fair value hierarchy
levels.
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$1,206
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,206
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
182
|
1,304
|
-
|
1,486
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
382
|
1,026
|
-
|
1,408
|
||||
Power
contracts
|
-
|
-
|
313
|
313
|
||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
9
|
||||
Other
investments
|
39
|
-
|
-
|
39
|
||||
$1,818
|
$2,330
|
$313
|
$4,461
|
|||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$53
|
$-
|
$-
|
$53
|
The
following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the assets
(liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the
SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy for the three months ended June 30,
2009:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Balance
as of beginning of period
|
$351
|
($288)
|
||
Price
changes (unrealized gains/losses)
|
36
|
(480)
|
||
Originated
|
2
|
(3)
|
||
Settlements
|
(76)
|
37
|
||
Balance
as of June 30
|
$313
|
($734)
|
55
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the assets
(liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the
SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy for the six months ended June 30,
2009:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Balance
as of January 1
|
$207
|
($12)
|
||
Price
changes (unrealized gains/losses)
|
237
|
(676)
|
||
Originated
|
2
|
(77)
|
||
Settlements
|
(133)
|
31
|
||
Balance
as of June 30
|
$313
|
($734)
|
The
following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy established
by SFAS 157, the Registrant Subsidiaries' assets that are accounted for at fair
value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009. The assessment of the
significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment
and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy
levels.
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Entergy
Arkansas:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$79.7
|
$-
|
$-
|
$79.7
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
3.3
|
160.6
|
-
|
163.9
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
19.3
|
213.8
|
-
|
233.1
|
||||
$102.3
|
$374.4
|
$-
|
$476.7
|
|||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$67.0
|
$-
|
$-
|
$67.0
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
1.5
|
130.2
|
-
|
131.7
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
21.5
|
158.8
|
-
|
180.3
|
||||
$90.0
|
$289.0
|
$-
|
$379.0
|
|||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$12.2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$12.2
|
56
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy
Louisiana:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$72.5
|
$-
|
$-
|
$72.5
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
7.1
|
89.0
|
-
|
96.1
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
43.9
|
45.1
|
-
|
89.0
|
||||
Other
investments
|
0.8
|
-
|
-
|
0.8
|
||||
$124.3
|
$134.1
|
$-
|
$258.4
|
|||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$23.5
|
$-
|
$-
|
$23.5
|
||||
Entergy
Mississippi:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$42.0
|
$-
|
$-
|
$42.0
|
||||
Other
investments
|
31.9
|
-
|
-
|
31.9
|
||||
$73.9
|
$-
|
$-
|
$73.9
|
|||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$15.4
|
$-
|
$-
|
$15.4
|
||||
Entergy
New Orleans:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$121.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
$121.6
|
||||
Other
investments
|
6.2
|
-
|
-
|
6.2
|
||||
$127.8
|
$-
|
$-
|
$127.8
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$1.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1.6
|
||||
Entergy
Texas:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$75.3
|
$-
|
$-
|
$75.3
|
||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
9.1
|
-
|
-
|
9.1
|
||||
$84.4
|
$-
|
$-
|
$84.4
|
|||||
System
Energy:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$91.1
|
$-
|
$-
|
$91.1
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
2.1
|
143.9
|
-
|
146.0
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
56.5
|
78.4
|
-
|
134.9
|
||||
$149.7
|
$222.3
|
$-
|
$372.0
|
57
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
NOTE
9. DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System
Energy)
Entergy
holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear
decommissioning trust accounts. The NRC requires Entergy to maintain
trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford
3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades
(NYPA currently retains the decommissioning trusts and liabilities for Indian
Point 3 and FitzPatrick). The funds are invested primarily in equity
securities; fixed-rate, fixed-income securities; and cash and cash
equivalents.
Entergy
applies the provisions of SFAS 115, "Accounting for Investments for Certain Debt
and Equity Securities," in accounting for investments in decommissioning trust
funds. As a result, Entergy records the decommissioning trust funds
on the balance sheet at their fair value. Because of the ability of
the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in
accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the
Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized
gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory
liabilities/assets. For the nonregulated portion of River Bend,
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized
gains/(losses) in other deferred credits/debits. Decommissioning
trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do
not receive regulatory treatment. Accordingly, unrealized gains
recorded on the assets in these trust funds are recognized in the accumulated
other comprehensive income component of common shareholders' equity because
these assets are classified as available for sale. Unrealized losses
(where cost exceeds fair market value) on the assets in these trust funds are
also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of common
shareholders' equity unless the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary and
therefore recorded in earnings. Entergy records realized gains and
losses on its debt and equity securities generally using the specific
identification method to determine the cost basis of its
securities.
The
securities held at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$1,487
|
$106
|
$88
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
1,407
|
54
|
12
|
|||
Total
|
$2,894
|
$160
|
$100
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$1,436
|
$85
|
$177
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
1,396
|
77
|
21
|
|||
Total
|
$2,832
|
$162
|
$198
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $1,365 million and $1,340 million at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The debt securities
have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.89%, an average duration of
approximately 5.12 years, and an average maturity of approximately 8.4
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are
designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are
held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the
Russell 3000 Index.
58
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at June 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$302
|
$49
|
$278
|
$7
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
77
|
39
|
67
|
5
|
||||
Total
|
$379
|
$88
|
$345
|
$12
|
The
unrealized losses in excess of twelve months above relate to Entergy's Utility
operating companies and System Energy.
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$11
|
$21
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
634
|
526
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
435
|
490
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
107
|
146
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
54
|
52
|
||
20
years+
|
166
|
161
|
||
Total
|
$1,407
|
$1,396
|
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $699 million and $491 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $16 million and $8 million, respectively, and gross losses of $10
million and $3 million, respectively, were either reclassified out of other
comprehensive income into earnings or recorded into earnings.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $1,282 million and $748 million,
respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $30 million and $14 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$26 million and $5 million, respectively, were either reclassified out of other
comprehensive income into earnings or recorded into earnings.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Arkansas holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in
nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
59
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$163.8
|
$32.4
|
$11.2
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
233.1
|
10.8
|
1.8
|
|||
Total
|
$396.9
|
$43.2
|
$13.0
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$165.6
|
$31.7
|
$13.7
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
224.9
|
12.8
|
2.4
|
|||
Total
|
$390.5
|
$44.5
|
$16.1
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $224.1 million and $214.5 million as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The debt
securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.77%, an average
duration of approximately 4.93 years, and an average maturity of approximately
6.1 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are
designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor's 500
Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in
funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair value and gross unrealized
losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by
investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous
loss position, are as follows at June 30, 2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$44.1
|
$6.7
|
$23.0
|
$1.3
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
9.6
|
4.5
|
18.8
|
0.5
|
||||
Total
|
$53.7
|
$11.2
|
$41.8
|
$1.8
|
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$2.1
|
$2.0
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
122.3
|
127.0
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
95.6
|
93.9
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
2.6
|
2.0
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
4.0
|
-
|
||
20
years+
|
6.5
|
-
|
||
Total
|
$233.1
|
$224.9
|
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $21.9 million and $81.5 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $0.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
60
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $51.7 million and $104.9 million,
respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $0.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$1.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana holds
debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear
decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$131.6
|
$5.3
|
$22.6
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
180.4
|
8.1
|
1.0
|
|||
Total
|
$312.0
|
$13.4
|
$23.6
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$132.3
|
$4.6
|
$24.5
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
170.9
|
8.7
|
3.3
|
|||
Total
|
$303.2
|
$13.3
|
$27.8
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $173.3 million and $165.5 million as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The debt
securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.92%, an average
duration of approximately 6.09 years, and an average maturity of approximately
9.4 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are
designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor's 500
Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in
funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at June 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$93.2
|
$17.0
|
$8.4
|
$0.3
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
11.0
|
5.6
|
11.6
|
0.7
|
||||
Total
|
$104.2
|
$22.6
|
$20.0
|
$1.0
|
61
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$5.7
|
$6.5
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
37.3
|
36.5
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
73.3
|
75.7
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
43.9
|
36.0
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
12.0
|
8.7
|
||
20
years+
|
8.2
|
7.5
|
||
Total
|
$180.4
|
$170.9
|
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $9.9 million and $15.3 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.4 million and $0.09 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $33.7 million and $26.3 million,
respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity
securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust
accounts. The securities held at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$96.1
|
$5.2
|
$15.5
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
89.0
|
3.7
|
1.6
|
|||
Total
|
$185.1
|
$8.9
|
$17.1
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$93.3
|
$3.9
|
$17.2
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
87.6
|
7.1
|
1.6
|
|||
Total
|
$180.9
|
$11.0
|
$18.8
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $87.0 million and $82.1 million as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The debt securities
have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.07%, an average duration of
approximately 4.97 years, and an average maturity of approximately 10.0
years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are
designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor's 500
Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in
funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
62
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at June 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$43.8
|
$8.6
|
$25.5
|
$1.0
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
13.5
|
6.9
|
4.2
|
0.6
|
||||
Total
|
$57.3
|
$15.5
|
$29.7
|
$1.6
|
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$0.3
|
$1.2
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
32.9
|
33.4
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
23.8
|
21.4
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
11.5
|
10.5
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
5.2
|
6.8
|
||
20
years+
|
15.3
|
14.3
|
||
Total
|
$89.0
|
$87.6
|
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $23.3 million and $4.3 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $1.1 million and $0.01 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.3 million and $0.08 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $33.5 million and $9.3 million,
respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $1.5 million and $0.02 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
63
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
System
Energy
System
Energy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in
nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$147.7
|
$4.5
|
$34.0
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
133.2
|
2.0
|
1.6
|
|||
Total
|
$280.9
|
$6.5
|
$35.6
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$127.8
|
$2.0
|
$36.3
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
141.0
|
6.9
|
3.9
|
|||
Total
|
$268.8
|
$8.9
|
$40.2
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $132.7 million and $138.0 million as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The debt
securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.40%, an average
duration of approximately 4.67 years, and an average maturity of approximately
7.7 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are
designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor's 500
Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in
funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at June 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$59.8
|
$12.6
|
$46.6
|
$0.8
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
43.1
|
21.4
|
7.1
|
0.8
|
||||
Total
|
$102.9
|
$34.0
|
$53.7
|
$1.6
|
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$0.2
|
$2.0
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
83.5
|
48.0
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
30.2
|
44.0
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
0.4
|
10.0
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
0.8
|
1.2
|
||
20
years+
|
18.1
|
35.8
|
||
Total
|
$133.2
|
$141.0
|
||
64
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $170.1 million and $141.5 million,
respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $0.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$3.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the dispositions of
securities amounted to $322.0 million and $176.5 million,
respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
gross gains of $3.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively, and gross losses of
$6.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
Other-than-temporary
impairments and unrealized gains and losses
Entergy,
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System
Energy evaluate these unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine
whether an other than temporary impairment has occurred. Effective
January 1, 2009, Entergy adopted FSP FAS 115-2, "Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments". The assessment of whether an investment
in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on
whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required
to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs. Further,
if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the
debt security, an other-than-temporary-impairment shall have been considered to
have occurred and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to
be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss). For debt
securities held as of January 1, 2009 for which an other-than-temporary
impairment had previously been recognized but for which assessment under the new
guidance indicates this impairment is temporary, Entergy recorded an adjustment
to its opening balance of retained earnings of $11.3 million ($6.4 million
net-of-tax). Entergy did not have any material other than temporary impairments
relating to credit losses on debt securities for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The assessment of whether an investment in an equity security has
suffered an other than temporary impairment continues to be based on a number of
factors including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the
investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and,
then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a
reasonable period of time. Entergy's trusts are managed by third
parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment
guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments.
Non-Utility Nuclear recorded charges to other income of $69 million and $85
million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, resulting
from the recognition of the other than temporary impairment of certain equity
securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.
NOTE
10. INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Audits and
Litigation
See Note 3 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of tax proceedings.
NOTE
11. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2008 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets"
(FSP 132(R)-1) which requires enhanced disclosures about plan assets of defined
benefit pension and other postretirement plans including disclosure of each
major category of plan assets using the fair value hierarchy and concentrations
of risk within plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2009.
In June 2009 the FASB issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46R (FIN 46R)" (SFAS 167). FIN 46R is entitled "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities". SFAS 167 amends FIN 46R to replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which
enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to
direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
impact the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses
of the
65
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
entity or
(2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. SFAS 167 also
requires additional disclosures on an interim and annual basis about an
enterprise's involvement in variable interest entities. The standard will be
effective for Entergy in the first quarter of 2010. Entergy does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a material effect on its financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
__________________________________
In the opinion of the management of
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy
Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas and System
Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of
previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for
a fair statement of the results for the interim periods
presented. The business of the Registrant Subsidiaries is subject to
seasonal fluctuations, however, with the peak periods occurring during the third
quarter. The results for the interim periods presented should not be
used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full
year.
66
Part
I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As of June 30, 2009, evaluations were
performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy
Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana,
Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy
(individually "Registrant" and collectively the "Registrants") management,
including their respective Chief Executive Officers (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officers (CFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the
Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the
evaluations, each CEO and CFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or
Registrants for which they serve as CEO or CFO, the Registrant's or Registrants'
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms; and that the Registrant's or Registrants' disclosure controls
and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information
is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's or Registrants' management,
including their respective CEOs and CFOs, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the
participation of the Registrants' management, including their respective CEOs
and CFOs, the Registrants evaluated changes in internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and found no
change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, internal control over financial reporting.
67
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net income decreased $11.1 million
primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher
depreciation and amortization expenses, higher nuclear refueling outage
expenses, higher interest expense, and a higher effective income tax
rate. The decrease was partially offset by lower taxes other than
income taxes.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased $17.7 million
primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher other
operation and maintenance expenses, higher nuclear refueling outage expenses,
higher interest expense, and a higher effective income tax rate. The
decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue.
Net
Revenue
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges
(credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008.
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$279.9
|
|
Purchased
power capacity
|
5.6
|
|
Storm
cost recovery
|
3.9
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
(3.6)
|
|
Other
|
(3.2)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$282.6
|
The purchased power capacity variance
is primarily due to lower purchased power capacity charges.
The storm cost recovery variance is due
to the recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm costs as approved by the APSC,
effective January 2009. The recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm
costs is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K.
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to higher allocation of fuel to wholesale customers coupled with
lower gains on substitute energy.
68
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $48.5 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in
the average price of energy available for resale sales;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $20.4 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a change
in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2009 and decreased
usage. See Note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion
of the energy cost recovery rider
filing.
|
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market price of purchased
power.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2008.
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$528.1
|
|
Storm
cost recovery
|
9.6
|
|
Purchased
power capacity
|
9.2
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
6.0
|
|
Volume/weather
|
(5.5)
|
|
Other
|
(4.9)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$542.5
|
The storm cost recovery variance is due
to the recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm costs as approved by the APSC,
effective January 2009. The recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm
costs is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K.
The purchased power capacity variance
is primarily due to lower purchased power capacity charges.
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to the implementation of the capacity acquisition
rider.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to a 14.1% volume decrease in industrial sales primarily in the
mid to small customer class.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $72.3 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a
decrease in the average price of energy available for resale sales offset by an
increase of $40.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues primarily due to
changes in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2008 and September
2008. The energy cost recovery rider filings are discussed in Note 2
to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K.
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market price of purchased
power, partially offset by an increase in deferred fuel expense due to a higher
energy cost recovery rate, as discussed above.
69
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other
Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
increased primarily due to the amortization of higher expenses associated with
the planned maintenance and refueling outage at ANO 1 which ended in December
2008.
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase in legal expense as a result of a reimbursement in April 2008 of
$7 million of costs in connection with a litigation
settlement;
|
·
|
an
increase of $5.4 million due to higher fossil plant outage costs in
2009;
|
·
|
an
increase of $3.2 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $2.6 million due to the addition of the Ouachita plant to the
fossil fleet in September 2008.
|
The
increase was partially offset by a decrease of $12.5 million due to the
capitalization of Ouachita service charges previously expensed.
Taxes other than income taxes decreased
primarily due to a decrease in ad valorem taxes due to a higher millage rate in
2008 and a higher assessment in 2008.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Interest expense increased primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as a result of the issuance of
$300 million of 5.40% Series First Mortgage Bonds in July 2008.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
increased primarily due to the amortization of higher expenses associated with
the planned maintenance and refueling outage at ANO 1 which ended in December
2008.
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $8.5 million due to higher fossil plant outage costs in
2009;
|
·
|
an
increase of $7.8 million due to the addition of the Ouachita plant to the
fossil fleet in September 2008;
|
·
|
an
increase of $7.2 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in legal expense as a result of a reimbursement in April 2008 of
$7 million of costs in connection with a litigation
settlement.
|
The
increase was partially offset by a decrease of $12.5 million due to the
capitalization of Ouachita service charges previously expensed and a decrease of
$5.4 million in payroll-related costs.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Interest expense increased primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as a result of the issuance of
$300 million of 5.40% Series First Mortgage Bonds in July 2008.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rates for the
second quarters of 2009 and 2008 were 57.3% and 47.9%,
respectively. The effective income tax rates for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 54.8% and 45.3%, respectively. The
difference in the effective income tax rate for the second quarter 2009 and the
six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is
primarily due to certain book and tax differences related to utility plant
items, state income
70
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
taxes,
and payroll and benefits related items, partially offset by the amortization of
investment tax credits. The difference in the effective income tax
rate for the second quarter 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is
primarily due to book and tax differences related to utility plant items and
state income taxes. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is
primarily due to book and tax differences related to utility plant items, state
income taxes, and an adjustment to the provision for uncertain tax positions,
partially offset by flow-through book and tax timing differences.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$39,568
|
$212
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
257,810
|
151,859
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(204,966)
|
(179,625)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(12,287)
|
38,113
|
|||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
40,557
|
10,347
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$80,125
|
$10,559
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow from operations increased
$106 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to an increase in recovery of fuel costs and
income tax refunds of $24.9 million in 2009 compared to income tax payments of
$36.2 million in 2008, partially offset by ice storm restoration spending in
2009.
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities increased $25.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to money pool
activity, partially offset by a decrease in construction
expenditures. The decrease in construction expenditures is primarily
due to a decrease in nuclear construction expenditures resulting from various
nuclear projects that occurred in 2008 and a decrease in fossil construction
expenditures resulting from the purchase of coal handling equipment in 2008,
partially offset by an increase in distribution construction expenditures in
2009 as a result of an ice storm hitting Entergy Arkansas' service territory in
the first quarter of 2009.
Increases in Entergy Arkansas'
receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas'
receivable from the money pool increased $35.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing
arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for external
short-term borrowings.
71
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Financing
Activities
Financing activities used $12.3 million
of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to providing $38.1
million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to
borrowings of $100 million on Entergy Arkansas' credit facility in 2008,
partially offset by money pool activity. Decreases in Entergy
Arkansas' payable to the money pool is a use of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas'
payable to the money pool decreased by $52.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Capital
Structure
Entergy
Arkansas' capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
52.3%
|
52.9%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.2%
|
0.6%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
53.5%
|
53.5%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock
without sinking fund, and shareholders' equity. Net capital consists
of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Arkansas uses the
net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes
it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating
Entergy Arkansas' financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of Entergy Arkansas' uses and sources of
capital. Following are updates to the information provided in the
Form 10-K.
In April
2009, Entergy Arkansas renewed its credit facility through April 2010 in the
amount of $88 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under the
Entergy Arkansas credit facility as of June 30, 2009.
Entergy
Arkansas' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as
follows:
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$51,217
|
$15,991
|
($25,541)
|
($77,882)
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
White Bluff Coal Plant
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the environmental compliance project that will install scrubbers and low NOx
burners at Entergy Arkansas' White Bluff coal plant. In March 2009,
Entergy Arkansas made a filing with the APSC seeking a declaratory order that
the White Bluff project is in the public interest. In May 2009 the
APSC Staff filed a motion requesting that the APSC require Entergy Arkansas to
file testimony on several issues. In a subsequent order the APSC set
a procedural schedule that includes an evidentiary hearing beginning on February
16, 2010. In addition, in June 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed with the
APSC, under Arkansas Act 310, an interim surcharge to recover the costs incurred
through May 31, 2009, on the White Bluff project. Entergy Arkansas
has incurred $1.9 million
72
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
through
May 31, 2009. Under Arkansas Act 310 the surcharge goes into effect
immediately upon filing, subject to refund, and additional surcharge filings are
permitted every six months. On July 20, 2009, the APSC staff filed a
motion with the APSC requesting that the APSC enter an order regarding the
conduct of this and subsequent Act 310 filings related to the White Bluff
project, including requiring Entergy Arkansas to provide additional information
and justification for costs recovered pursuant to Act 310. In July
2009 the Arkansas attorney general filed a motion in the Act 310 proceeding
opposing the imposition of the surcharge, and challenging Entergy Arkansas' cost
calculation.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Ouachita Power
Plant
In August 2008, the LPSC issued an
order approving an uncontested settlement between Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
and the LPSC Staff authorizing Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's purchase, under a
life-of-unit agreement, of one-third of the capacity and energy from the 789 MW
Ouachita power plant, which Entergy Arkansas acquired on
September 30, 2008. The LPSC's approval was subject to
certain conditions, including a study to determine the costs and benefits of
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana exercising an option to purchase one-third of the
plant (Unit 3) from Entergy Arkansas. In April 2009, Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana made a filing with the LPSC seeking approval of Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana exercising its option to convert its purchased power agreement
into the ownership interest in Unit 3 and a one-third interest in the Ouachita
common facilities. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana estimates that the
purchase price will be approximately $72.6 million, subject to change based on
several factors, including the timing of the closing. The filing also
requests LPSC approval of the cost-recovery mechanism for the
acquisition. In addition, in April 2009, Entergy Arkansas and Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana filed with the FERC for its approval of the transaction,
and in June 2009 the FERC issued an order approving the
transaction. A
procedural schedule has been issued in the LPSC proceeding that provides for
hearings to be held August 26-27 and 31, 2009. If the acquisition is
approved, Entergy currently expects that the closing would take place in the
fourth quarter 2009.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Retail
Rates
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the rate filing made by Entergy Arkansas and the proceedings regarding that
filing. On April 23, 2009, the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy
Arkansas' petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision.
On July 2, 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed
a notice with the APSC of its intention to file within 60 to 90 days for a
general change in rates, charges, and tariffs. Entergy Arkansas plans
to file the rate case in September 2009.
Energy
Cost Recovery Rider
In March 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed
with the APSC its annual energy cost rate for the period April 2009 through
March 2010. The filed energy cost rate decreased from $0.02456/kWh to
$0.01552/kWh. The decrease was caused by the following: 1) all three
of the nuclear power plants from which Entergy Arkansas obtains power, ANO 1 and
2 and Grand Gulf, had refueling outages in 2008, and the previous energy cost
rate had been adjusted to account for the replacement power
73
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
costs
that would be incurred while these units were down; 2) Entergy Arkansas has a
deferred fuel cost liability from over-recovered fuel costs at December 31,
2008, as compared to a deferred fuel cost asset from under-recovered fuel costs
at December 31, 2007; offset by 3) an increase in the fuel and purchased power
prices included in the calculation.
Storm
Cost Recovery
Entergy Arkansas Storm
Reserve Accounting
The APSC's June 2007 order in Entergy
Arkansas' base rate proceeding, which is discussed in the Form 10-K, eliminated
storm reserve accounting for Entergy Arkansas. In March 2009 a law
was enacted in Arkansas that requires the APSC to permit storm reserve
accounting for utilities that request it. Entergy Arkansas filed its
request with the APSC, and has reinstated storm reserve accounting effective
January 1, 2009.
Entergy Arkansas January
2009 Ice Storm
In January 2009 a severe ice storm
caused significant damage to Entergy Arkansas' transmission and distribution
lines, equipment, poles, and other facilities. The current cost
estimate for the damage caused by the ice storm is approximately $120 million to
$140 million, of which approximately $65 million to $80 million is estimated to
be operating and maintenance type costs and the remainder is estimated to be
capital investment. On January 30, 2009, the APSC issued an order
inviting and encouraging electric public utilities to file specific proposals
for the recovery of extraordinary storm restoration expenses associated with the
ice storm. Although Entergy Arkansas has not yet filed a proposal for
the method of recovery of its costs, on February 16, 2009, it did file a request
with the APSC for an accounting order authorizing deferral of the operating and
maintenance cost portion of Entergy Arkansas' ice storm restoration costs
pending their recovery. The APSC issued such an order in March 2009
subject to certain conditions, including that if Entergy Arkansas seeks to
recover the deferred costs, those costs will be subject to investigation for
whether they are incremental, prudent, and reasonable. Entergy
Arkansas is still analyzing its options for the method of recovery of the ice
storm restoration costs. One option is securitization, and in April
2009 a law was enacted in Arkansas that authorizes securitization of storm
damage restoration costs.
Federal
Regulation
See "System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in the "Rate,
Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the
discussion in the Form 10-K.
Utility
Restructuring
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Utility
Restructuring" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility
restructuring.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Nuclear
Matters" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear
matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
74
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See
"MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas' accounting for nuclear
decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other
postretirement benefits.
Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs
In the
first quarter 2009, Entergy Arkansas recorded a revision to its estimated
decommissioning cost liabilities for ANO 1 and 2 as a result of a revised
decommissioning cost study. The revised estimates resulted in an $8.9
million reduction in its decommissioning liability, along with a corresponding
reduction in the related regulatory asset.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
75
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 518,009 | $ | 580,462 | $ | 1,054,003 | $ | 1,079,835 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
82,334 | 83,703 | 267,490 | 167,265 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
151,947 | 223,318 | 246,274 | 389,842 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
10,467 | 7,286 | 19,961 | 14,217 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
124,605 | 116,547 | 232,031 | 223,671 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
8,347 | 8,696 | 17,490 | 17,248 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
18,604 | 22,480 | 39,971 | 38,219 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
63,268 | 59,066 | 125,629 | 116,303 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
1,091 | (6,435 | ) | (2,244 | ) | (5,392 | ) | |||||||||
TOTAL
|
460,663 | 514,661 | 946,602 | 961,373 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
57,346 | 65,801 | 107,401 | 118,462 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
850 | 1,563 | 2,625 | 3,341 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
3,795 | 5,547 | 7,019 | 10,804 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(1,142 | ) | (722 | ) | (2,070 | ) | (1,735 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
3,503 | 6,388 | 7,574 | 12,410 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
21,686 | 18,207 | 42,898 | 36,835 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
1,210 | 1,907 | 1,884 | 3,845 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(544 | ) | (749 | ) | (1,647 | ) | (1,599 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
22,352 | 19,365 | 43,135 | 39,081 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
38,497 | 52,824 | 71,840 | 91,791 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
22,074 | 25,303 | 39,347 | 41,552 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
16,423 | 27,521 | 32,493 | 50,239 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
1,718 | 1,718 | 3,437 | 3,437 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK
|
$ | 14,705 | $ | 25,803 | $ | 29,056 | $ | 46,802 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
76
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 32,493 | $ | 50,239 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Reserve
for regulatory adjustments
|
(1,645 | ) | (3,010 | ) | ||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(2,244 | ) | (5,392 | ) | ||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
143,119 | 133,551 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes and investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
58,433 | 34,884 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
(57,181 | ) | (273 | ) | ||||
Fuel
inventory
|
(1,589 | ) | (8,846 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
(40,878 | ) | (85,077 | ) | ||||
Interest
accrued
|
(1,888 | ) | (670 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
122,270 | 38,826 | ||||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
66,220 | 21,347 | ||||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(2,617 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(32,875 | ) | 8,739 | |||||
Other
|
(23,808 | ) | (32,422 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
257,810 | 151,859 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(167,408 | ) | (174,456 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
2,625 | 3,341 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(771 | ) | (60,335 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
594 | 60,377 | ||||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
51,651 | 104,860 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(56,431 | ) | (113,412 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(35,226 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(204,966 | ) | (179,625 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Change
in credit borrowings - net
|
- | 100,000 | ||||||
Change
in money pool payable - net
|
- | (52,341 | ) | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(8,700 | ) | (6,000 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(3,437 | ) | (3,437 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(150 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(12,287 | ) | 38,113 | |||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
40,557 | 10,347 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
39,568 | 212 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 80,125 | $ | 10,559 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 43,992 | $ | 36,634 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | (24,911 | ) | $ | 36,174 | |||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
77
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 378 | $ | 3,292 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
79,747 | 36,276 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash investments
|
80,125 | 39,568 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
103,621 | 113,135 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(22,081 | ) | (19,882 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
90,485 | 56,534 | ||||||
Other
|
113,703 | 64,762 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
92,346 | 71,118 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
378,074 | 285,667 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
- | 119,061 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
16,812 | 15,223 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
130,146 | 121,769 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
24,481 | 42,932 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
334,286 | 394,000 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
40,785 | 36,530 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,004,709 | 1,054,750 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
11,200 | 11,200 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
396,978 | 390,529 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,437 | 1,439 | ||||||
Other
|
5,391 | 5,391 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
415,006 | 408,559 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
7,662,806 | 7,305,165 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
1,392 | 1,417 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
92,931 | 142,391 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
147,504 | 125,072 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
9,005 | 12,115 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
7,913,638 | 7,586,160 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
3,543,340 | 3,272,280 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
4,370,298 | 4,313,880 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
49,112 | 58,455 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
742,429 | 688,964 | ||||||
Other
|
35,371 | 43,605 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
826,912 | 791,024 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 6,616,925 | $ | 6,568,213 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
78
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 100,000 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
418,370 | 433,460 | ||||||
Other
|
116,465 | 142,974 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
65,125 | 60,558 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
143,821 | 198,902 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
23,319 | 25,207 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
3,209 | - | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
60,280 | 60,276 | ||||||
Other
|
13,410 | 17,290 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
943,999 | 938,667 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
1,412,825 | 1,307,596 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
49,895 | 51,881 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
88,616 | 66,214 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
30,190 | 27,141 | ||||||
Decommissioning
|
549,288 | 540,709 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
13,308 | 15,925 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
432,887 | 441,920 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,518,355 | 1,618,171 | ||||||
Other
|
40,997 | 43,780 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
4,136,361 | 4,113,337 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock without sinking fund
|
116,350 | 116,350 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000
|
||||||||
shares;
issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2009
|
||||||||
and
2008
|
470 | 470 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
588,444 | 588,444 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
831,301 | 810,945 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,420,215 | 1,399,859 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 6,616,925 | $ | 6,568,213 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
79
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 150 | $ | 158 | $ | ( 8 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
105 | 109 | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
93 | 110 | (17 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 20 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
354 | 382 | (28 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
86 | 115 | (29 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
25 | 44 | (19 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
53 | 39 | 14 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 518 | $ | 580 | $ | ( 62 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,481 | 1,551 | (70 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,359 | 1,384 | (25 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,490 | 1,765 | (275 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
64 | 66 | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
4,394 | 4,766 | (372 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
2,530 | 1,964 | 566 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
464 | 590 | (126 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
7,388 | 7,320 | 68 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 361 | $ | 337 | $ | 24 | 7 | |||||||||
Commercial
|
219 | 203 | 16 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
197 | 202 | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
10 | 9 | 1 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
787 | 751 | 36 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
159 | 211 | (52 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
57 | 77 | (20 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
51 | 41 | 10 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,054 | $ | 1,080 | $ | ( 26 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
3,590 | 3,694 | (104 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
2,711 | 2,731 | (20 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
2,989 | 3,478 | (489 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
127 | 131 | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
9,417 | 10,034 | (617 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
4,400 | 3,918 | 482 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
1,027 | 1,130 | (103 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
14,844 | 15,082 | (238 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
80
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana's service territory in September 2008. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their storm cost recovery case with
the LPSC in May 2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a
determination that $150.7 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $90
million. The storm restoration costs are net of costs that have
already been paid from previously funded storm reserves. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana expect to make a supplemental filing in
the third quarter of 2009 to, among other things, recommend a recovery method
for costs approved by the LPSC. The parties have agreed to a
procedural schedule that includes March 2010 hearing dates for both the
recoverability and the method of recovery proceedings. Recovery
options include traditional base rate recovery, Louisiana Act 64 (passed in
2006) financing, or Louisiana Act 55 (passed in 2007)
financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing.
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net income increased by $5.6 million
primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses, lower interest
and other charges, and lower taxes other than income taxes, partially offset by
lower net revenue and lower other income.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income increased slightly by $1.9
million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses, lower
interest and other charges, and lower taxes other than income taxes, partially
offset by lower other income and lower net revenue.
Net
Revenue
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory charges
(credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$206.9
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(9.2)
|
|
Other
|
3.7
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$201.4
|
81
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to:
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing; and
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as well as
the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is offset
in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by a formula rate plan increase effective
September 2008. Refer to "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation
-Retail Rates - Electric" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan.
Gross
operating revenues and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $172.2 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $57.4 million in affiliated wholesale revenue due to a
decrease in the average price of energy available for resale sales;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $10.4 million in gross gas revenue primarily due to lower fuel
rates.
|
Purchased
power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in volume and the average
market price of purchased power.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$402.4
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(10.8)
|
|
Other
|
5.9
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$397.5
|
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to:
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing; and
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as well as
the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is offset
in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by a formula rate plan increase effective
September 2008. Refer to "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation -
Retail Rates - Electric" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan.
82
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $233.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates and decreased
usage;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $46.8 million in affiliated wholesale revenue due to a
decrease in the average price of energy available for resale sales, offset
by an increase in net generation and purchases resulting in less energy
available for resale sales; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $19.3 million in gross gas revenue primarily due to lower fuel
rates.
|
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in volume and the
average market price of purchased power, partially offset by an increase in
deferred fuel expense due to fuel and purchased power expense decreases in
excess of lower fuel cost recovery revenues.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $5.3 million in loss reserves primarily due to lower storm
damage accruals;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $2.9 million in fossil expenses primarily due to lower plant
maintenance costs and plant outages;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $2.6 million in payroll-related
costs.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by an increase of $2.6 million in nuclear labor
and contract costs and an increase of $2.3 million in customer service costs
primarily as a result of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
Taxes other than income taxes decreased
primarily due to a decrease in local franchise taxes as a result of lower
residential and commercial revenue.
Other
income decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $4.1 million in interest and dividend income related to the
debt assumption agreement with Entergy Texas. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana remains primarily liable on this debt, of which $699
million remained outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and $930 million remained
outstanding as of June 30, 2008;
|
·
|
the
cessation of $1.6 million in carrying charges on Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita storm restoration costs as a result of the Act 55 storm
cost financing; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $1.4 million in interest earned on decommissioning trust
funds.
|
The
decrease is partially offset by distributions of $4.7 million earned on
preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the
proceeds received from the Act 55 storm cost financings and $1 million in
carrying charges on Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs
approved by the LPSC. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest and other charges decreased
primarily due to a decrease in long-term debt outstanding, partially offset by
higher interest on deferred fuel costs.
83
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $8.2 million in loss reserves primarily due to lower storm
damage accruals;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $6 million in payroll-related costs;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $1.9 million in fossil expenses primarily due to lower plant
maintenance costs and plant
outages.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by an increase of $4.8 million in nuclear labor
and contract costs and an increase of $3.3 million in customer service costs
primarily as a result of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
Taxes
other than income taxes decreased primarily due to a decrease in local franchise
taxes as a result of lower residential and commercial revenue.
Other income decreased primarily due
to:
·
|
a
decrease of $8.3 million in interest and dividend income related to the
debt assumption agreement with Entergy Texas. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana remains primarily liable on this debt, of which $699
million remained outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and $930 million remained
outstanding as of June 30, 2008;
|
·
|
the
cessation of $4.3 million in carrying charges on Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita storm restoration costs as a result of the Act 55 storm
cost financing;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $2.1 million in interest earned on decommissioning trust
funds; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $1 million in interest earned on money pool
investments.
|
The
decrease is partially offset by distributions of $9.4 million earned on
preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the
proceeds received from the Act 55 storm cost financings and $1 million in
carrying charges on Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs
approved by the LPSC. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest and other charges decreased
primarily due to a decrease in long-term debt outstanding, partially offset by
higher interest on deferred fuel costs.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 38.4%
for the second quarter 2009 and 39.7% for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to book
and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes,
partially offset by book and tax differences related to storm cost
financing. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is
primarily due to book and tax differences related to utility plant items and
state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to
storm cost financing, book and tax differences related to allowance for equity
funds used during construction, and the amortization of investment tax
credits.
The effective income tax rate was 40.3%
for the second quarter 2008 and 39.8% for the six months ended June 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter 2008 and the six months ended June 30, 2008 versus the federal statutory
rate of 35% is due to book and tax differences related to utility plant items
and state income taxes, partially offset by flow-through book and tax timing
differences, the amortization of investment tax credits, and book and tax
differences related to allowance for equity funds used during
construction.
84
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$49,303
|
$108,036
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
120,994
|
108,645
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(96,493)
|
(177,810)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(6,607)
|
(5,395)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
17,894
|
(74,560)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$67,197
|
$33,476
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash flow provided in operating
activities increased $12.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to the timing of
the collection of receivables from customers and increased recovery of deferred
fuel costs, almost entirely offset by storm restoration spending resulting from
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike and income tax payments of $29.3 million in
2009 compared to income tax payments of $11.2 million in 2008.
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities decreased $81.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to:
·
|
the
purchase of the Calcasieu Generating Facility for $56 million in March
2008. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of this purchase;
|
·
|
timing
differences between nuclear fuel purchases and fuel trust reimbursements;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease in nuclear construction expenditures resulting from various
nuclear projects in 2008, including work done during the spring 2008
refueling outage at River Bend.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by money pool activity and an increase in
transmission construction expenditures resulting from various projects in
2009. Increases in Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's receivable from
the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's
receivable from the money pool increased by $31 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to increasing by $19.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing
arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for external
short-term borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities increased $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to borrowings of
$30 million on Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's credit facility in 2008,
substantially offset by a decrease in common equity distributions.
85
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital
Structure
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's
capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following
table. The
calculation below does not reduce the debt by the debt assumed by Entergy Texas
($699 million as of June 30, 2009, and $770 million as of December 31, 2008)
because Entergy Gulf States Louisiana remains primarily liable on the
debt.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
59.6%
|
61.6%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
0.8%
|
0.6%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
60.4%
|
62.2%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and members'
equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash
equivalents. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana uses the net debt to net
capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides
useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana's financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana's uses and sources of capital. Following are updates
to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's
receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$42,597
|
$11,589
|
$74,961
|
$55,509
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
As
discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has a credit facility
in the amount of $100 million scheduled to expire in August 2012. No
borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of June 30, 2009.
Little Gypsy Repowering
Project
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana's Little Gypsy repowering
project. On March 11, 2009, the LPSC voted in favor of a motion
directing Entergy Louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and,
based upon an analysis of the project's economic viability, to make a
recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project. This
action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in
natural gas prices, as well as environmental concerns, the unknown costs of
carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets. On
April 1, 2009, Entergy Louisiana complied with the LPSC's directive and
recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of
three years or more. Entergy Louisiana estimates that its total costs
for the project, if suspended, including actual spending to date and estimated
contract cancellation costs, will be approximately $300
million. Entergy Louisiana had obtained all major environmental
permits required to begin construction. A longer-term suspension
places these permits at risk and may adversely affect the project's economics
and technological feasibility. On May 22, 2009, the LPSC issued an
order declaring that Entergy Louisiana's decision to place the Little Gypsy
project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public
interest and prudent. Entergy Louisiana expects to make a filing
later in 2009 with the LPSC regarding the recovery of project costs already
incurred.
86
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Ouachita Power
Plant
In August
2008, the LPSC issued an order approving an uncontested settlement between
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and the LPSC Staff authorizing Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana's purchase, under a life-of-unit agreement, of one-third of the
capacity and energy from the 789 MW Ouachita power plant, which Entergy Arkansas
acquired on September 30, 2008. The LPSC's approval was
subject to certain conditions, including a study to determine the costs and
benefits of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana exercising an option to purchase
one-third of the plant (Unit 3) from Entergy Arkansas. In April 2009,
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made a filing with the LPSC seeking approval of
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana exercising its option to convert its purchased
power agreement into the ownership interest in Unit 3 and a one-third interest
in the Ouachita common facilities. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
estimates that the purchase price will be approximately $72.6 million, subject
to change based on several factors, including the timing of the
closing. The filing also requests LPSC approval of the cost-recovery
mechanism for the acquisition. In addition, in April 2009, Entergy
Arkansas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the FERC for its approval
of the transaction, and in June 2009 the FERC issued an order approving the
transaction. A procedural schedule has been issued in the LPSC
proceeding that provides for hearings to be held August 26-27 and 31,
2009. If the acquisition is approved, Entergy currently expects that
the closing would take place in the fourth quarter 2009.
Pension
Contributions
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Jurisdictional Separation of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf
States, Inc. into two vertically integrated utility companies, one operating
under the sole retail jurisdiction of the PUCT, Entergy Texas, and the other
operating under the sole retail jurisdiction of the LPSC, Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana. Pursuant to the LPSC order approving the jurisdictional
separation plan, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made two compliance filings in
2008. On March 31, 2008, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made its
jurisdictional separation plan balance sheet compliance filing with the
LPSC. On June 11, 2008, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made its
revenue and expense compliance filing. On December 29, 2008, the LPSC
staff filed a motion with the LPSC seeking resolution of certain issues in the
proceeding, and a hearing on these matters scheduled to be held in July 2009 has
been continued and is scheduled to begin October 29, 2009.
The
remaining issues between the parties relate to the LPSC allegation that Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana violated the terms of the LPSC approval of the
jurisdictional separation in accounting for the transfer of the Spindletop
regulatory asset to Entergy Texas. The Spindletop regulatory asset
was created by the LPSC in a 1996 order. The LPSC staff alleges that
the costs related to the regulatory asset that are currently collected by
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana in rates and paid to Entergy Texas pursuant to the
terms of the LPSC's approval of the jurisdictional separation be accounted for
by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana as production costs under the FERC chart of
accounts resulting in an increase in the System Agreement rough production cost
equalization remedy payments owed to Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana. The LPSC staff requested that the LPSC require
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to account for these costs as production costs and
to hold harmless ratepayers for the alleged accounting violations; or
alternatively, that the LPSC direct Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to reacquire
its proportionate share of the Spindletop storage facility at its amortized net
book value, subject to the condition that Entergy Texas ratepayers repurchase
the assets at the greater of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's undepreciated costs
or full market value if the Sabine Gas Unit, to which the Spindletop storage
facility is connected, is no longer dispatched as part of the Entergy
System.
87
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
In
response, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed a motion to dismiss certain of the
remedies requested by the LPSC staff for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction
alleging that the FERC has exclusive jurisdiction over which costs are properly
recorded as production costs under the FERC chart of accounts for purposes
of the calculation of the System Agreement rough production cost
equalization remedy payments. The ALJ agreed with Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and determined that the LPSC has no jurisdiction to order the Company
to record these costs as production costs. The question whether the
Spindletop regulatory asset costs should be included in the System Agreement
rough production cost equalization remedy calculation is also currently pending
before the FERC in a complaint filed at the FERC by the LPSC, and in an initial
decision, the FERC ALJ rejected the LPSC's complaint and determined that the
costs related to the Spindletop regulatory asset are not production
costs.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
In July 2009 the LPSC issued an order
noting that the LPSC Staff and Entergy are continuing in negotiations that could
result in the recommendation for the adoption of new Formula Rate Plans for
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC Staff will
report to the LPSC on the progress of those negotiations at the LPSC's September
meeting. In the interim Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's and Entergy
Louisiana's base rates will remain unchanged. Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana will both implement previously approved capacity
cost adjustments. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's net increase in
capacity costs of $5 million will be deferred for future
recovery. Entergy Louisiana's net decrease in capacity costs of $17
million will be used to increase the storm reserve accrual.
In
January 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate
stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2008. The filing
showed a revenue deficiency of $529 thousand based on a return on common equity
mid-point of 10.5%. In April 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
implemented a $255 thousand rate increase pursuant to an uncontested settlement
with the LPSC staff.
Federal
Regulation
See
"System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries' Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form
10-K.
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Industrial
and Commercial Customers" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial
and commercial customers.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Nuclear
Matters" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear
matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's accounting for
nuclear decommissioning costs, the application of SFAS 71, unbilled revenue, and
qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
88
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries' Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
89
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 430,866 | $ | 681,491 | $ | 889,871 | $ | 1,201,787 | ||||||||
Natural
gas
|
10,397 | 21,045 | 40,297 | 59,313 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
441,263 | 702,536 | 930,168 | 1,261,100 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
65,697 | 56,394 | 173,687 | 82,116 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
171,522 | 440,379 | 351,464 | 772,185 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
5,293 | 8,084 | 10,528 | 11,783 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
82,349 | 91,487 | 162,100 | 170,964 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
3,363 | 3,100 | 6,658 | 6,139 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
17,445 | 19,403 | 35,169 | 36,685 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
34,472 | 34,108 | 67,731 | 67,234 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
2,685 | (1,159 | ) | 7,567 | 4,387 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
382,826 | 651,796 | 814,904 | 1,151,493 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
58,437 | 50,740 | 115,264 | 109,607 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
1,012 | 1,222 | 3,284 | 2,915 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
16,866 | 19,461 | 35,104 | 42,269 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(1,830 | ) | (1,100 | ) | (3,221 | ) | (2,028 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
16,048 | 19,583 | 35,167 | 43,156 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
26,072 | 31,486 | 55,098 | 63,252 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
2,331 | 740 | 4,565 | 1,564 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(700 | ) | (731 | ) | (2,033 | ) | (1,810 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
27,703 | 31,495 | 57,630 | 63,006 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
46,782 | 38,828 | 92,801 | 89,757 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
17,980 | 15,641 | 36,878 | 35,744 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
28,802 | 23,187 | 55,923 | 54,013 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
distribution requirements and other
|
206 | 207 | 412 | 413 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY
|
$ | 28,596 | $ | 22,980 | $ | 55,511 | $ | 53,600 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
90
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 55,923 | $ | 54,013 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
7,567 | 4,387 | ||||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
74,389 | 73,373 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
59,199 | 77,410 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
61,127 | (74,624 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
(2,819 | ) | (3,458 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
(85,115 | ) | 81,767 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
48,058 | - | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
(2,615 | ) | (376 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
14,908 | (65,694 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
22,253 | (98,852 | ) | |||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
91 | 1,398 | ||||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(29,696 | ) | (935 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(102,276 | ) | 60,236 | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
120,994 | 108,645 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(84,132 | ) | (100,924 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
3,284 | 2,915 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(116 | ) | (21,807 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
20,621 | 21,755 | ||||||
Payment
for purchase of plant
|
- | (56,409 | ) | |||||
Investment
in affiliates
|
160 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
33,706 | 26,318 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(39,008 | ) | (33,328 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(31,008 | ) | (19,452 | ) | ||||
Changes
in other investments - net
|
- | 3,934 | ||||||
Other
|
- | (812 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(96,493 | ) | (177,810 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
- | 369,549 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
- | (366,681 | ) | |||||
Changes
in credit borrowing - net
|
- | 30,000 | ||||||
Dividends/distributions
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
equity
|
(6,000 | ) | (37,800 | ) | ||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
(412 | ) | (447 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(195 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in financing activities
|
(6,607 | ) | (5,395 | ) | ||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
17,894 | (74,560 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
49,303 | 108,036 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 67,197 | $ | 33,476 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 60,795 | $ | 63,446 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 29,337 | $ | 11,154 | ||||
Noncash
financing activities:
|
||||||||
Repayment
by Entergy Texas of assumed long-term debt
|
$ | 70,825 | $ | 148,837 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
91
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 169 | $ | 22,671 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
67,028 | 26,632 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
67,197 | 49,303 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
50,340 | 69,264 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(4,441 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
186,568 | 179,217 | ||||||
Other
|
33,219 | 60,618 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
62,336 | 50,272 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
328,022 | 358,141 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
62,876 | 50,039 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
36,570 | 33,751 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
110,183 | 104,579 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
7,230 | 17,135 | ||||||
Debt
assumption by Entergy Texas
|
100,509 | 100,509 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
9,130 | 6,381 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
721,717 | 719,838 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliate preferred membership interests
|
189,400 | 189,560 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
311,953 | 303,178 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
122,763 | 120,829 | ||||||
Other
|
13,696 | 13,245 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
637,812 | 626,812 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
6,543,526 | 6,402,668 | ||||||
Natural
gas
|
110,098 | 106,125 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
93,814 | 201,544 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
127,334 | 140,689 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
8,623 | 11,177 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
6,883,395 | 6,862,203 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
3,590,765 | 3,560,458 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
3,292,630 | 3,301,745 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
308,938 | 316,421 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
287,435 | 287,912 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
100,124 | 100,124 | ||||||
Long-term
receivables
|
21,571 | 21,558 | ||||||
Debt
assumption by Entergy Texas
|
598,637 | 669,462 | ||||||
Other
|
13,998 | 13,089 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,330,703 | 1,408,566 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 5,982,862 | $ | 6,056,961 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
92
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 219,470 | $ | 219,470 | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
108,800 | 155,147 | ||||||
Other
|
78,856 | 162,319 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
44,618 | 40,484 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
48,476 | 418 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
27,497 | 30,112 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
106,884 | 91,976 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
24,368 | 24,368 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
7,708 | 7,479 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
12,234 | 20,184 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
91,714 | 67,000 | ||||||
Other
|
8,794 | 9,220 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
779,419 | 828,177 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
1,373,897 | 1,308,449 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
89,940 | 91,634 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
102,966 | 116,321 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
27,276 | 22,007 | ||||||
Decommissioning
and asset retirement cost liabilities
|
232,509 | 222,909 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
13,987 | 13,896 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
183,499 | 188,390 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,757,172 | 1,827,859 | ||||||
Other
|
39,952 | 105,176 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,821,198 | 3,896,641 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
membership interests without sinking fund
|
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Members'
equity
|
1,401,909 | 1,352,408 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(29,664 | ) | (30,265 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
|
1,382,245 | 1,332,143 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 5,982,862 | $ | 6,056,961 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
93
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF MEMBERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,379,318 | $ | 1,312,933 | ||||||||||||
Add:
Net Income
|
28,802 | $ | 28,802 | 23,187 | $ | 23,187 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends/distributions
declared on common equity
|
6,000 | 7,400 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
206 | 206 | 207 | 207 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
5 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
6,211 | 7,619 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,401,909 | $ | 1,328,501 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
LOSS
(Net of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (29,863 | ) | $ | (22,605 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense
of
$309 and $452)
|
199 | 199 | 303 | 303 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (29,664 | ) | $ | (22,302 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 28,795 | $ | 23,283 | ||||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,352,408 | $ | 1,312,701 | ||||||||||||
Add: Net
Income
|
55,923 | $ | 55,923 | 54,013 | $ | 54,013 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends/distributions
declared on common equity
|
6,000 | 37,800 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
412 | 412 | 413 | 413 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
10 | - | ||||||||||||||
6,422 | 38,213 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,401,909 | $ | 1,328,501 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
LOSS
(Net of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (30,265 | ) | $ | (22,934 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense
of $745 and $880)
|
601 | 601 | 632 | 632 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (29,664 | ) | $ | (22,302 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 56,112 | $ | 54,232 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
94
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 88 | $ | 131 | $ | (43 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
86 | 131 | (45 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
95 | 179 | (84 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
4 | 6 | (2 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
273 | 447 | (174 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
105 | 162 | (57 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
31 | 48 | (17 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
22 | 24 | (2 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 431 | $ | 681 | $ | (250 | ) | (37 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,126 | 1,133 | (7 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,211 | 1,213 | (2 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,818 | 2,161 | (343 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
55 | 53 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
4,210 | 4,560 | (350 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
1,930 | 1,932 | (2 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
743 | 671 | 72 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
6,883 | 7,163 | (280 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 189 | $ | 246 | $ | (57 | ) | (23 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
185 | 242 | (57 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
207 | 332 | (125 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
9 | 12 | (3 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
590 | 832 | (242 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
201 | 248 | (47 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
63 | 93 | (30 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
36 | 29 | 7 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 890 | $ | 1,202 | $ | (312 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
2,182 | 2,224 | (42 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
2,336 | 2,348 | (12 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
3,478 | 4,298 | (820 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
106 | 106 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
8,102 | 8,976 | (874 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
3,713 | 2,678 | 1,035 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
1,404 | 1,335 | 69 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
13,219 | 12,989 | 230 | 2 | ||||||||||||
95
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Hurricane
Gustav (and, to a much lesser extent, Hurricane Ike), which caused catastrophic
damage to Entergy Louisiana's service territory in September
2008. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their
storm cost recovery case with the LPSC in May 2009. Entergy Louisiana
seeks a determination that $261.9 million of storm restoration costs are
recoverable and seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of a $200
million. The storm restoration costs are net of costs that have
already been paid from previously funded storm reserves. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana expect to make a supplemental filing in
the third quarter of 2009 to, among other things, recommend a recovery method
for costs approved by the LPSC. The parties have agreed to a
procedural schedule that includes March 2010 hearing dates for both the
recoverability and the method of recovery proceedings. Recovery
options include traditional base rate recovery, Louisiana Act 64 (passed in
2006) financing, or Louisiana Act 55 (passed in 2007)
financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing.
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net income increased $3.4 million
primarily due to higher other income and a lower effective income tax rate,
substantially offset by lower net revenue.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income increased $20.4 million
primarily due to higher other income, lower other operation and maintenance
expenses, and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by lower net
revenue, higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and higher interest
expense.
Net
Revenue
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$258.2
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(17.3)
|
|
Other
|
0.7
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$241.6
|
96
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to:
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing; and
|
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm cost recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as
well as the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is
offset in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2
to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan.
|
Refer to
"MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the Act 55
storm cost financing.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other
regulatory charges
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $171.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower
fuel rates and decreased usage; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $22.6 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in
net generation and purchases resulting in less energy available for resale
sales coupled with a decrease in the average price of energy available for
resale sales.
|
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Other
regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the amortization of interim storm
cost recoveries that ceased in July 2008 with the Act 55 financing of storm
costs. Refer to "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the Act 55
storm cost financing.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$477.5
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(34.5)
|
|
Other
|
10.5
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$453.5
|
The
retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing; and
|
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm cost recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as
well as the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is
offset in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2
to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan.
|
97
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Refer to
"MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the Act 55
storm cost financing.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $207 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel
rates and decreased usage; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $21.2 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in
net generation and purchases resulting in less energy available for resale
sales.
|
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Other
regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the amortization of interim storm
cost recoveries that ceased in July 2008 with the Act 55 financing of storm
costs. Refer to "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the Act 55
storm cost financing.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Other
income increased primarily due to:
·
|
distributions
of $13.6 million earned on preferred membership interests purchased from
Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received from the Act 55 storm
cost financings. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to
increased construction work in progress in
2009.
|
Interest
expense increased slightly primarily due to an increase in long-term debt
outstanding as a result of the issuance of $300 million of 6.50% Series First
Mortgage Bonds in August 2008, partially offset by an increase in the allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction due to increased construction work
in progress in 2009.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Other
operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $9.7 million in loss reserves for storm damage in 2009 because
of the completion of the Act 55 storm cost
financing;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $5.4 million in payroll-related costs;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $2.4 million due to lower fossil plant outage expenses
compared to 2008.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by the following:
·
|
an
increase of $2.8 million in nuclear expenses due to higher nuclear labor
and contract costs; and
|
·
|
an
increase of $2.4 million in customer service costs primarily as a result
of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
|
98
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other
income increased primarily due to:
·
|
distributions
of $27.2 million earned on preferred membership interests purchased from
Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received from the Act 55 storm
cost financings. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to
more construction work in progress in
2009.
|
Interest
expense increased primarily due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as
a result of the issuance of $300 million of 6.50% Series First Mortgage Bonds in
August 2008, partially offset by an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds
used during construction due to more construction work in progress in
2009.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 29.9%
for the second quarter of 2009 and 27.7% for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the
second quarter 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35.0% are primarily due to book and tax differences related to
the storm cost financing and allowance for equity funds used during
construction, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to
utility plant items and state income taxes.
The
effective income tax rate was 39.7% for the second quarter of 2008 and 41.5% for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. The differences in the effective
income tax rates for the second quarter 2008 and the six months ended June 30,
2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% are primarily due to certain
book and tax differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes,
partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity
funds used during construction and the amortization of investment tax
credits.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$138,918
|
$300
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
166,826
|
15,820
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(212,944)
|
(201,257)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(19,972)
|
185,507
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(66,090)
|
70
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$72,828
|
$370
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow provided by operating
activities increased $151 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to increased
recovery of fuel costs and income tax refunds of $31.0 million in 2009 compared
to income tax payments of $1.3 million in 2008, partially offset by storm
restoration spending caused by Hurricane Gustav.
99
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities increased $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to increased
construction expenditures in 2009 due to Hurricane Gustav, the Little Gypsy Unit
3 repowering project and the Waterford 2 Generator Stator rewind
project. The increase was partially offset by decreased nuclear
construction expenditures resulting from various nuclear projects in 2008 and
money pool activity.
Decreases in Entergy Louisiana's
receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy
Louisiana's receivable from the money pool decreased $14.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. The money pool is an inter-company
borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for
external short-term borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Entergy
Louisiana's financing activities used $20 million of cash for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to providing $185.5 million of cash for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to borrowings of $200 million on
Entergy Louisiana's credit facility in 2008 and money pool activity, partially
offset by the repurchase in 2008 of $60 million of Auction Rate governmental
bonds.
Increases in Entergy Louisiana's
payable to the money pool is a source of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana's
payable to the money pool increased by $49.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Capital
Structure
Entergy
Louisiana's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
43.4%
|
43.6%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.2%
|
2.5%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
44.6%
|
46.1%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and members'
equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash
equivalents. Entergy Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio
in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information
to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana's financial
condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy
Louisiana's uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the
discussion in the Form 10-K.
Entergy
Louisiana's receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as
follows:
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$46,559
|
$61,236
|
($52,419)
|
($2,791)
|
100
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
As
discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the
amount of $200 million scheduled to expire in August 2012. No
borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of June 30, 2009.
Little Gypsy Repowering
Project
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana's Little Gypsy repowering
project. On March 11, 2009, the LPSC voted in favor of a motion
directing Entergy Louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and,
based upon an analysis of the project's economic viability, to make a
recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project. This
action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in
natural gas prices, as well as environmental concerns, the unknown costs of
carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets. On
April 1, 2009, Entergy Louisiana complied with the LPSC's directive and
recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of
three years or more. Entergy Louisiana estimates that its total costs
for the project, if suspended, including actual spending to date and estimated
contract cancellation costs, will be approximately $300
million. Entergy Louisiana had obtained all major environmental
permits required to begin construction. A longer-term suspension
places these permits at risk and may adversely affect the project's economics
and technological feasibility. On May 22, 2009, the LPSC issued an
order declaring that Entergy Louisiana's decision to place the Little Gypsy
project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public
interest and prudent. Entergy Louisiana expects to make a filing
later in 2009 with the LPSC regarding the recovery of project
costs.
Waterford 3 Steam Generator
Replacement Project
In July 2009 the LPSC granted Entergy
Louisiana's motion to dismiss, without prejudice, its application seeking
recovery of cash earnings on construction work in progress (CWIP) for the steam
generator replacement project, acknowledging Entergy Louisiana's right, at any
time, to seek cash earnings on CWIP if Entergy Louisiana believes that
circumstances or projected circumstances are such that a request for cash
earnings on CWIP is merited. The cash earnings on CWIP application
had been consolidated with a similar request for the Little Gypsy repowering
project that was also dismissed in response to the same motion.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
In July 2009 the LPSC issued an order
noting that the LPSC Staff and Entergy are continuing in negotiations that could
result in the recommendation for the adoption of new Formula Rate Plans for
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC Staff will
report to the LPSC on the progress of those negotiations at the LPSC's September
meeting. In the interim Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's and Entergy
Louisiana's base rates will remain unchanged. Entergy Gulf
States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana will both implement previously approved capacity
cost adjustments. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's net increase in
capacity costs of $5 million will be deferred for future
recovery. Entergy Louisiana's net decrease in capacity costs of $17
million will be used to increase the storm reserve
accrual.
101
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
In May 2007, Entergy Louisiana made its
formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the 2006 test year, indicating a 7.6%
earned return on common equity. That filing included Entergy
Louisiana's request to recover $39.8 million in unrecovered fixed costs
associated with the loss of customers that resulted from Hurricane Katrina, a
request that was reduced to $31.7 million. In September 2007, Entergy
Louisiana modified its formula rate plan filing to reflect its implementation of
certain adjustments proposed by the LPSC Staff in its review of Entergy
Louisiana's original filing with which Entergy Louisiana agreed, and to reflect
its implementation of an $18.4 million annual formula rate plan increase
comprised of (1) a $23.8 million increase representing 60% of Entergy
Louisiana's revenue deficiency, and (2) a $5.4 million decrease for reduced
incremental and deferred capacity costs. The LPSC authorized Entergy
Louisiana to defer for accounting purposes the difference between its $39.8
million claim, now at $31.7 million, for unrecovered fixed costs and 60% of the
revenue deficiency to preserve Entergy Louisiana's
right to pursue that claim in full during the formula rate plan
proceeding. In October 2007, Entergy Louisiana implemented a $7.1
million formula rate plan decrease that was due primarily to the
reclassification of certain franchise fees from base rates to collection via a
line item on customer bills pursuant to an LPSC Order. The LPSC staff
and intervenors recommended disallowance of certain costs included in Entergy
Louisiana's filing. Entergy Louisiana disagrees with the majority of
the proposed disallowances and a hearing on the disputed issues was held in
late-September/early-October 2008. In March 2009 the ALJ issued a
proposed recommendation, which does not allow recovery of the unrecovered fixed
costs and also disallows recovery of all costs associated with Entergy's stock
option plan. Entergy Louisiana has filed exceptions to the ALJ's
proposed recommendation.
Federal
Regulation
See "System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in the "Rate,
Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the
discussion in the Form 10-K.
Utility
Restructuring
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Utility
Restructuring" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility
restructuring.
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Industrial
and Commercial Customers" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial
and commercial customers.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Nuclear
Matters" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear
matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana's accounting for nuclear
decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other
postretirement benefits.
102
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
103
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 527,156 | $ | 753,778 | $ | 1,056,413 | $ | 1,318,522 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
84,993 | 142,279 | 219,567 | 255,274 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
194,614 | 342,322 | 371,136 | 564,849 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
5,475 | 4,222 | 11,069 | 8,725 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
108,169 | 111,537 | 201,811 | 212,409 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
5,295 | 4,931 | 10,497 | 9,775 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
17,071 | 16,507 | 33,715 | 31,248 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
50,569 | 47,909 | 100,016 | 94,970 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
5,959 | 10,944 | 12,214 | 20,927 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
472,145 | 680,651 | 960,025 | 1,198,177 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
55,011 | 73,127 | 96,388 | 120,345 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
7,414 | 3,765 | 14,860 | 7,022 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
16,820 | 3,956 | 38,332 | 8,705 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(1,425 | ) | (727 | ) | (2,198 | ) | (1,939 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
22,809 | 6,994 | 50,994 | 13,788 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
23,501 | 18,777 | 46,908 | 38,332 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
2,045 | 3,031 | 4,205 | 4,186 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(4,782 | ) | (2,308 | ) | (9,592 | ) | (4,304 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
20,764 | 19,500 | 41,521 | 38,214 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
57,056 | 60,621 | 105,861 | 95,919 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
17,066 | 24,077 | 29,334 | 39,780 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
39,990 | 36,544 | 76,527 | 56,139 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
distribution requirements and other
|
1,738 | 1,738 | 3,475 | 3,475 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
EQUITY
|
$ | 38,252 | $ | 34,806 | $ | 73,052 | $ | 52,664 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
104
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 76,527 | $ | 56,139 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
12,214 | 20,927 | ||||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
110,513 | 104,745 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
80,720 | 55,975 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
102,838 | (49,797 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(44,070 | ) | 134,714 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
283 | 19,130 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
(7,460 | ) | (7,248 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
(28,644 | ) | (260,114 | ) | ||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(32,904 | ) | (106,877 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
95 | 2,630 | ||||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(116,055 | ) | 12,824 | |||||
Other
|
12,769 | 32,772 | ||||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
166,826 | 15,820 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(240,172 | ) | (203,859 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
14,860 | 7,022 | ||||||
Insurance
proceeds
|
- | 612 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(87 | ) | (70,626 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from the sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
125 | 70,216 | ||||||
Investment
in affiliates
|
160 | - | ||||||
Changes
in other investments - net
|
996 | (500 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
33,463 | 9,293 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(36,966 | ) | (13,415 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
14,677 | - | ||||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(212,944 | ) | (201,257 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(6,597 | ) | (60,000 | ) | ||||
Changes
in credit borrowing - net
|
- | 200,000 | ||||||
Change
in money pool payable - net
|
- | 49,628 | ||||||
Distributions
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
equity
|
(9,700 | ) | - | |||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
(3,475 | ) | (2,897 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(200 | ) | (1,224 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(19,972 | ) | 185,507 | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(66,090 | ) | 70 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
138,918 | 300 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 72,828 | $ | 370 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 56,837 | $ | 48,039 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | (31,044 | ) | $ | 1,250 | |||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
105
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 332 | $ | - | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
72,496 | 138,918 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
72,828 | 138,918 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
70,636 | 127,765 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,889 | ) | (1,698 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
170,130 | 244,575 | ||||||
Other
|
10,628 | 11,271 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
82,405 | 67,512 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
331,910 | 449,425 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
57,073 | 66,229 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
124,746 | 128,388 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
9,208 | 19,962 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
18,974 | 10,046 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
614,739 | 812,968 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliate preferred membership interests
|
544,994 | 545,154 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
185,096 | 180,862 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,215 | 1,306 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
9,353 | 9,353 | ||||||
Other
|
809 | 1,805 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
741,467 | 738,480 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
6,917,675 | 6,734,732 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
256,348 | 256,348 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
599,841 | 602,070 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
48,062 | 74,197 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
7,821,926 | 7,667,347 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
3,312,236 | 3,245,701 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
4,509,690 | 4,421,646 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
134,798 | 107,596 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
515,149 | 515,053 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
67,998 | 67,998 | ||||||
Long-term
receivables
|
1,209 | 1,209 | ||||||
Other
|
21,083 | 20,218 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
740,237 | 712,074 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 6,606,133 | $ | 6,685,168 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
106
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 72,326 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
51,619 | 67,465 | ||||||
Other
|
125,445 | 254,055 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
81,803 | 78,401 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
25,976 | 25,693 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
30,820 | 38,280 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
62,919 | 91,563 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
38,362 | 38,362 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
9,153 | 8,935 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
120,000 | 156,000 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
23,464 | 26,668 | ||||||
Other
|
31,053 | 33,841 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
672,940 | 819,263 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
2,040,544 | 1,940,065 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
81,249 | 82,848 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
9,700 | 35,843 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
34,545 | 43,562 | ||||||
Decommissioning
|
287,337 | 276,839 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
20,011 | 19,916 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
283,837 | 282,683 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,308,566 | 1,387,473 | ||||||
Other
|
95,378 | 88,838 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
4,161,167 | 4,158,067 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
membership interests without sinking fund
|
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Members'
equity
|
1,695,405 | 1,632,053 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(23,379 | ) | (24,215 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
|
1,772,026 | 1,707,838 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 6,606,133 | $ | 6,685,168 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
107
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF MEMBERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,662,253 | $ | 1,499,367 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
39,990 | $ | 39,990 | 36,544 | $ | 36,544 | ||||||||||
39,990 | 36,544 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Distributions
declared:
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
1,738 | 1,738 | 1,738 | 1,738 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock dividend to parent
|
5,100 | - | ||||||||||||||
6,838 | 1,738 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,695,405 | $ | 1,534,173 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME (Net
of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (23,797 | ) | $ | (27,486 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $348 and
$409)
|
418 | 418 | 482 | 482 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (23,379 | ) | $ | (27,004 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 38,670 | $ | 35,288 | ||||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,632,053 | $ | 1,481,509 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
76,527 | $ | 76,527 | 56,139 | $ | 56,139 | ||||||||||
76,527 | 56,139 | |||||||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Distributions
declared:
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
3,475 | 3,475 | 3,475 | 3,475 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock dividend to parent
|
9,700 | - | ||||||||||||||
13,175 | 3,475 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,695,405 | $ | 1,534,173 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME (Net
of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (24,215 | ) | $ | (27,968 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $697 and
$818)
|
836 | 836 | 964 | 964 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (23,379 | ) | $ | (27,004 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 73,888 | $ | 53,628 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
108
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 151 | $ | 215 | $ | (64 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
112 | 155 | (43 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
174 | 259 | (85 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
9 | 11 | (2 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
446 | 640 | (194 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
46 | 66 | (20 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
1 | 3 | (2 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
34 | 45 | (11 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 527 | $ | 754 | $ | (227 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,902 | 1,976 | (74 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,399 | 1,435 | (36 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
3,435 | 3,437 | (2 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Governmental
|
110 | 113 | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
6,846 | 6,961 | (115 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
390 | 630 | (240 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
11 | 30 | (19 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
7,247 | 7,621 | (374 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 315 | $ | 397 | $ | (82 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
230 | 283 | (53 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
358 | 464 | (106 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
19 | 22 | (3 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
922 | 1,166 | (244 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
78 | 97 | (19 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
3 | 5 | (2 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
53 | 51 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,056 | $ | 1,319 | $ | (263 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
3,834 | 3,946 | (112 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
2,711 | 2,743 | (32 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
6,478 | 6,667 | (189 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
225 | 230 | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
13,248 | 13,586 | (338 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
739 | 1,110 | (371 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
66 | 53 | 13 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
14,053 | 14,749 | (696 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
109
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net income increased $3.8 million
primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by lower other income, a
higher effective income tax rate, and higher depreciation and amortization
expenses.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income increased $4.4 million
primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance
expenses, offset by lower other income, higher taxes other than income taxes,
higher depreciation and amortization expenses, and a higher effective income tax
rate.
Net
Revenue
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges
(credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$135.4
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
7.3
|
|
Volume/weather
|
1.7
|
|
Other
|
2.6
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$147.0
|
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to an increase in the Attala power plant costs that are recovered
through the power management rider. The net income effect of this
recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with
the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other operation and
maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income
taxes.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to more favorable volume during the unbilled sales period compared
to the same period in 2008, offset by a 16% decrease in electricity usage in the
industrial sector. Billed electricity usage decreased a total of 217
GWh.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges (credits)
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $35.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel
rates and decreased usage; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $25.6 million in gross wholesale revenues primarily due to a
decrease in volume as a result of less energy available for resale
sales.
|
110
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to decreases in the average market prices of natural gas
and purchased power, significantly offset by an increase in deferred fuel
expenses.
Other regulatory charges (credits)
decreased primarily due to decreased recovery of costs associated with the power
management recovery rider and decreased recovery through the Grand Gulf rider of
Grand Gulf capacity costs due to lower rates and decreased usage. There is no
material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power
management recovery rider and annual adjustments to the Grand Gulf
rider.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net
revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses,
and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other
regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$240.9
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
9.4
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
1.8
|
|
Volume/weather
|
(2.4)
|
|
Other
|
4.1
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$253.8
|
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to an increase in the Attala power plant costs that are recovered
through the power management rider. The net income effect of this
recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with
the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other operation and
maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income
taxes.
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to a change in a contract with a wholesale customer that increased
the volume in its monthly demand charge.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather and a 17.4% decrease in
electricity usage in the industrial sector. Billed electricity usage
decreased a total of 365 GWh.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges (credits)
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $40.8 million in gross wholesale revenues primarily due to a
decrease in volume as a result of less energy available for resale
sales;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $28.1 million in power management rider
revenue;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $15.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel
rates and decreased usage; and
|
·
|
the
volume/weather revenue variance discussed
above.
|
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to decreased gas fuel generation and decreases in the
average market prices of natural gas and purchased power, significantly offset
by an increase in deferred fuel expenses.
Other regulatory charges (credits)
decreased primarily due to decreased recovery of costs associated with the power
management recovery rider and decreased recovery through the Grand Gulf Rider of
Grand Gulf capacity costs due to lower rates and decreased usage. There is no
material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power
management recovery rider and annual adjustments to the Grand Gulf
rider.
111
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Other
Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other income decreased primarily due to
the potential buyer's forfeiture of a $1.7 million deposit in June 2008 for an
option to purchase non-utility property.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $3.1 million in payroll-related costs;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $1.1 million in loss
reserves.
|
These
decreases were partially offset by an increase of $2.1 million in legal spending
due to increased regulatory activity.
Taxes other than income taxes increased
primarily due to a revision in January 2008 based on the receipt of information
to finalize 2007 expense.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other income decreased primarily due to
the potential buyer's forfeiture of a $1.7 million deposit in June 2008 for an
option to purchase non-utility property.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 40.2%
for the second quarter 2009 and 37.6% for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter of 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to
state income taxes. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily
due to an adjustment to the provision for uncertain tax positions, book and tax
differences related to utility plant items, and payroll and benefits related
items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for
equity funds used during construction and the amortization of investment tax
credits.
The effective income tax rate was 37.2%
for the second quarter 2008 and 36% for the six months ended June 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter of 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to
state income taxes.
112
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$1,082
|
$40,582
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
53,951
|
12,372
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(84,773)
|
(77,357)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
71,865
|
37,519
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
41,043
|
(27,466)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$42,125
|
$13,116
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow provided by operating
activities increased $41.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to increased
recovery of deferred fuel costs, partially offset by the timing of payments to
vendors.
Investing
Activities
Cash flow used in investing activities
increased $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to money pool activity, offset by
decreased construction expenditures related to various fossil and distribution
projects.
Increases in Entergy Mississippi's
receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi's
receivable from the money pool increased by $27 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to increasing $7.4 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement
designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for external short-term
borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Cash flow
provided by financing activities increased $34.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due
to the issuance of $150 million of 6.64% Series First Mortgage Bonds in June
2009, offset by money pool activity and borrowings of $50 million on Entergy
Mississippi's credit facilities in 2008.
Decreases in Entergy Mississippi's
payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi's
payable to the money pool decreased by $66.0 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
113
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital
Structure
Entergy
Mississippi's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in
the following table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio is due
to the issuance of $150 million of first mortgage bonds in June 2009, as
discussed below.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
52.4%
|
49.5%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.3%
|
0.0%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
53.7%
|
49.5%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock
without sinking fund, and shareholders' equity. Net capital consists
of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Mississippi uses
the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and
believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in
evaluating Entergy Mississippi's financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of Entergy Mississippi's uses and sources of
capital. Following are updates to the information presented in the
Form 10-K.
Entergy Mississippi's receivables from
or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$26,958
|
($66,044)
|
$28,398
|
$20,997
|
See Note 4 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
In May and June 2009, Entergy
Mississippi renewed its two separate credit facilities through May 2010,
increasing the borrowing limits to the aggregate amount of $60
million. No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities
as of June 30, 2009.
In June 2009, Entergy Mississippi
issued $150 million of 6.64% Series First Mortgage Bonds due July
2019. Entergy Mississippi used the proceeds to repay outstanding
borrowings on its credit facilities, to repay short-term borrowings under the
Entergy System money pool, and for other general corporate
purposes.
Pension
Contributions
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula
rate plan and fuel and purchased power cost recovery. Following is an update to
that discussion.
114
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Formula
Rate Plan
In March 2009, Entergy Mississippi made
with the MPSC its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test
year. The filing reported a $27.0 million revenue deficiency and an earned
return on common equity of 7.41%. Entergy Mississippi requested a
$14.5 million increase in annual electric revenues, which is the maximum
increase allowed under the terms of the formula rate plan. The MPSC
issued an order on June 30, 2009, finding that Entergy Mississippi's earned
return was sufficiently below the lower bandwidth limit set by the formula rate
plan to require a $14.5 million increase in annual revenues, effective for bills
rendered on or after June 30, 2009.
In March 2008, Entergy Mississippi made
its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the
MPSC. The filing showed that a $10.1 million increase in annual
electric revenues is warranted. In June 2008, Entergy
Mississippi reached a settlement with the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff
that would result in a $3.8 million rate increase. In January
2009 the MPSC rejected the settlement and left the current rates in
effect. Entergy Mississippi appealed the MPSC's decision to the
Mississippi Supreme Court. After the decision of the MPSC regarding
the formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test year, Entergy Mississippi filed a
motion to dismiss its appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Fuel
and Purchased Power Recovery
On June 30, 2009, the MPSC issued an
order stating that it may hire an independent audit firm to audit Entergy
Mississippi's fuel adjustment clause or other mechanism directly related to the
purchase of fuel or energy for the period October 2007 through September
2009.
Federal
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Federal
Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of "System Agreement
Proceedings," "Transmission," and
"Interconnection
Orders."
Utility
Restructuring
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Utility
Restructuring" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility
restructuring.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi's accounting for unbilled revenue
and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
115
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 290,615 | $ | 351,982 | $ | 552,320 | $ | 646,832 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
79,748 | 70,428 | 180,561 | 149,192 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
79,850 | 120,269 | 175,119 | 216,368 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
58,796 | 59,240 | 109,025 | 110,346 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
15,203 | 15,163 | 31,812 | 29,974 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
21,730 | 20,860 | 43,013 | 41,274 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(16,021 | ) | 25,915 | (57,168 | ) | 40,400 | ||||||||||
TOTAL
|
239,306 | 311,875 | 482,362 | 587,554 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
51,309 | 40,107 | 69,958 | 59,278 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
754 | 838 | 1,718 | 1,614 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
223 | 564 | 449 | 774 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(674 | ) | 1,606 | (1,180 | ) | 944 | ||||||||||
TOTAL
|
303 | 3,008 | 987 | 3,332 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
10,993 | 10,195 | 21,460 | 20,745 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
1,066 | 1,309 | 2,220 | 2,445 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(429 | ) | (468 | ) | (1,046 | ) | (902 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
11,630 | 11,036 | 22,634 | 22,288 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
39,982 | 32,079 | 48,311 | 40,322 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
16,055 | 11,949 | 18,146 | 14,513 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
23,927 | 20,130 | 30,165 | 25,809 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
707 | 707 | 1,414 | 1,414 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK
|
$ | 23,220 | $ | 19,423 | $ | 28,751 | $ | 24,395 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
116
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 30,165 | $ | 25,809 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(57,168 | ) | 40,400 | |||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
43,013 | 41,274 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
5,007 | (899 | ) | |||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
11,333 | (44,248 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
(892 | ) | 817 | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(625 | ) | 78,455 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
(8,590 | ) | (4,678 | ) | ||||
Interest
accrued
|
(3,942 | ) | 1,026 | |||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
55,830 | (121,576 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(3,608 | ) | (27,681 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
2,950 | (7,320 | ) | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(51,609 | ) | 6,250 | |||||
Other
|
32,087 | 24,743 | ||||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
53,951 | 12,372 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(59,434 | ) | (70,992 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
1,718 | 1,614 | ||||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(26,958 | ) | (7,401 | ) | ||||
Payment
to storm reserve escrow account
|
(180 | ) | (578 | ) | ||||
Other
|
81 | - | ||||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(84,773 | ) | (77,357 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
148,723 | 29,533 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
- | (30,000 | ) | |||||
Change
in credit borrowings - net
|
- | 50,000 | ||||||
Change
in money pool payable - net
|
(66,044 | ) | - | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(9,400 | ) | (10,600 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(1,414 | ) | (1,414 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by financing activities
|
71,865 | 37,519 | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
41,043 | (27,466 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,082 | 40,582 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 42,125 | $ | 13,116 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 26,538 | $ | 21,120 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | - | $ | 4,209 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
117
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 141 | $ | 1,072 | ||||
Temporary
cash investment
|
41,984 | 10 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
42,125 | 1,082 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
56,868 | 76,503 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(729 | ) | (687 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
52,252 | 29,291 | ||||||
Other
|
10,099 | 11,675 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
49,368 | 35,451 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
167,858 | 152,233 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
- | 5,025 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
25,096 | 19,335 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
10,180 | 9,288 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
30,967 | 31,921 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
9,538 | 6,290 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
285,764 | 225,174 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
5,535 | 5,615 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
4,933 | 5,000 | ||||||
Storm
reserve escrow account
|
31,871 | 31,692 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
7,610 | 7,610 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
49,949 | 49,917 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
3,023,143 | 2,951,636 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
7,122 | 7,806 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
51,442 | 81,959 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
3,081,707 | 3,041,401 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,086,371 | 1,058,426 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
1,995,336 | 1,982,975 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
32,568 | 23,693 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
267,207 | 226,933 | ||||||
Other
|
21,575 | 19,451 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
321,350 | 270,077 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 2,652,399 | $ | 2,528,143 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
118
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
$ | 45,985 | $ | 115,876 | ||||
Other
|
39,868 | 39,623 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
61,405 | 58,517 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
32,306 | 40,896 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
13,171 | 17,113 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
50,805 | - | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
20,571 | 23,000 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
15,414 | 15,610 | ||||||
Other
|
3,796 | 5,373 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
283,321 | 316,008 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
590,774 | 571,193 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
8,060 | 8,605 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital lease
|
5,694 | 6,418 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
- | 22,331 | ||||||
Asset
retirement cost liabilities
|
4,925 | 4,784 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
39,907 | 36,957 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
115,257 | 118,223 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
845,267 | 695,330 | ||||||
Other
|
24,205 | 32,656 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,634,089 | 1,496,497 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock without sinking fund
|
50,381 | 50,381 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000
|
||||||||
shares;
issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
199,326 | 199,326 | ||||||
Capital
stock expense and other
|
(690 | ) | (690 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
485,972 | 466,621 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
684,608 | 665,257 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 2,652,399 | $ | 2,528,143 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
119
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 101 | $ | 116 | $ | ( 15 | ) | (13 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
95 | 108 | (13 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
36 | 44 | (8 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
9 | 10 | (1 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
241 | 278 | (37 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
10 | 36 | (26 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
7 | 9 | (2 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
33 | 29 | 4 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 291 | $ | 352 | $ | ( 61 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,094 | 1,157 | (63 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,115 | 1,162 | (47 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
519 | 621 | (102 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
96 | 101 | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
2,824 | 3,041 | (217 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
66 | 217 | (151 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
81 | 113 | (32 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
2,971 | 3,371 | (400 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 208 | $ | 227 | $ | ( 19 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
188 | 207 | (19 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
72 | 86 | (14 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
18 | 20 | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
486 | 540 | (54 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
15 | 56 | (41 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
14 | 15 | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
37 | 36 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 552 | $ | 647 | $ | ( 95 | ) | (15 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
2,378 | 2,446 | (68 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
2,186 | 2,259 | (73 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,026 | 1,243 | (217 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
189 | 196 | (7 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
5,779 | 6,144 | (365 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
86 | 398 | (312 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
152 | 149 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
6,017 | 6,691 | (674 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
120
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net income decreased $2.6 million
primarily due to lower net revenue.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased $5.2 million
primarily due to lower net revenue, partially offset by lower interest
expense.
Net
Revenue
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$66.6
|
|
Price
applied to unbilled sales
|
(4.6)
|
|
Effect
of rate case settlement
|
(1.0)
|
|
Volume/weather
|
4.1
|
|
Other
|
(1.2)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$63.9
|
The price applied to unbilled sales
variance results from a decline in natural gas and purchased power
prices.
The effect of rate case settlement
variance results from the April 2009 settlement of Entergy New Orleans' rate
case, and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the
operation of Grand Gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates
effective June 2009. See Note 2 to the financial statements for
further discussion of the rate case settlement.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to increased usage during the unbilled sales period.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $47.5 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to
a decrease in the average price of the energy available for resale
sales;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $31.6 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates and lower usage;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $14.3 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower
fuel cost recovery revenues.
|
121
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$129.0
|
|
Price
applied to unbilled sales
|
(7.2)
|
|
Effect
of rate case settlement
|
(2.2)
|
|
Volume/weather
|
3.3
|
|
Other
|
(2.9)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$120.0
|
The price applied to unbilled sales
variance results from a decline in natural gas and purchased power
prices.
The effect of rate case settlement
variance results from the April 2009 settlement of Entergy New Orleans' rate
case, and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the
operation of Grand Gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates
effective June 2009. See Note 2 to the financial statements for
further discussion of the rate case settlement.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to increased usage during the unbilled sales period.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $53.3 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in
the average price of energy available for resale
sales;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $32.9 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates and lower usage;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $19.9 million in gross gas revenues due to decreased fuel
recovery revenue as a result of lower
price.
|
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Other
income decreased primarily due to a reduction in interest earned on money pool
investments.
Interest
and other charges decreased primarily due to a reduction in the interest rate on
notes payable issued to affiliates as part of Entergy New Orleans' plan of
reorganization, as described more fully in Note 18 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K.
122
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 39.8%
for the second quarter 2009 and 39.6% for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the
second quarter of 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35% are primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax
differences related to utility plant items.
The effective income tax rate was 35.1%
for the second quarter 2008 and 41.4% for the six months ended June 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter of 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to
state income taxes, substantially offset by a $1.1 million adjustment to income
tax expense that related to expense for the first quarter 2008. The
difference in the effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30,
2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state income
taxes and book and tax differences related to utility plant items.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$137,444
|
$92,010
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
44,787
|
42,836
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(51,267)
|
(80,221)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(9,238)
|
(1,056)
|
|||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(15,718)
|
(38,441)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$121,726
|
$53,569
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash
flow provided by operating activities increased $2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due
to increased recovery of deferred fuel costs and the timing of
collections of receivables from customers partially offset by the timing of
payments to vendors.
Investing
Activities
Net cash used in investing activities
decreased $29 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to money pool activity and lower
capital expenditures due to the timing of various projects, partially offset by
insurance proceeds received in 2008 on the Hurricane Katrina claim.
Increases
in Entergy New Orleans' receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow,
and Entergy New Orleans' receivable from the money pool increased by $18 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to increasing $77.1 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Financing
Activities
Net cash used in financing activities
increased $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to dividends paid on common stock
in 2009.
123
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital
Structure
Entergy
New Orleans' capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
38.8%
|
37.0%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
14.6%
|
17.1%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
53.4%
|
54.1%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing
portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking
fund, and shareholders' equity. Net capital consists of capital less
cash and cash equivalents. Entergy New Orleans uses the net debt to
net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides
useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New
Orleans' financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of Entergy New Orleans' uses and sources of capital. The
following are updates to the Form 10-K.
Entergy
New Orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$78,079
|
$60,093
|
$124,796
|
$47,705
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Filings
with the City Council
Retail
Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, on July
31, 2008, Entergy New Orleans filed an electric and gas base rate case with the
City Council. On April 2, 2009, the City Council approved a
comprehensive settlement. The settlement provides for a net $35.3
million reduction in combined fuel and non-fuel revenue requirement, including
conversion of the $10.6 million voluntary recovery credit to a permanent
reduction and complete realignment of Grand Gulf cost recovery from fuel to base
rates, and a $4.95 million gas rate increase, both effective June 1,
2009. A new three-year formula rate plan was also adopted, with terms
including an 11.1% electric
124
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
return on common
equity (ROE) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth and a 10.75% gas ROE with a +/-
50 basis point bandwidth. Earnings outside the bandwidth reset to the
midpoint ROE, with the difference flowing prospectively to customers or Entergy
New Orleans depending on whether Entergy New Orleans is over- or
under-earning. The formula rate plan also includes a recovery
mechanism for City Council-approved capacity additions, plus provisions for
extraordinary cost changes and force majeure.
Fuel Adjustment Clause
Litigation
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed by a group of ratepayers in
April 1999 against Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
and Entergy Power in state court in Orleans Parish purportedly on behalf of all
Entergy New Orleans ratepayers. In February 2004, the City Council
approved a resolution that resulted in a refund to customers of $11.3 million,
including interest, during the months of June through September
2004. In May 2005 the Civil District Court for the Parish of
Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution, finding no support for the
plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be higher. In
June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the
Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. On February 25, 2008, the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision affirming in part, and
reversing in part, the Civil District Court's decision. Although the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal did not reverse any of the substantive findings
and conclusions of the City Council or the Civil District Court, the Fourth
Circuit found that the amount of the refund was arbitrary and capricious and
increased the amount of the refund to $34.3 million. In April 2009 the
Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision of the Civil District
Court. On April 17, 2009, the plaintiffs requested rehearing by the
Louisiana Supreme Court. On May 29, 2009, the Louisiana Supreme Court
denied the request for rehearing.
Federal
Regulation
See
"System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in the "Federal
Regulation" section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form
10-K.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans' accounting for unbilled revenue
and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
Unbilled
Revenue
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
New Orleans records an estimate of the revenues earned for energy delivered
since the latest customer billing. Effective June 1, 2009 the fuel
cost component is no longer included in the unbilled revenue calculation at
Entergy New Orleans.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
125
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
126
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 118,700 | $ | 194,567 | $ | 245,644 | $ | 334,795 | ||||||||
Natural
gas
|
18,437 | 32,941 | 62,587 | 84,067 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
137,137 | 227,508 | 308,231 | 418,862 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
25,946 | 101,058 | 93,733 | 180,957 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
47,087 | 58,795 | 94,364 | 106,806 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
28,085 | 27,413 | 54,535 | 52,233 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
8,761 | 10,099 | 19,216 | 20,233 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,455 | 8,209 | 16,770 | 16,303 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
224 | 1,029 | 178 | 2,059 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
118,558 | 206,603 | 278,796 | 378,591 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
18,579 | 20,905 | 29,435 | 40,271 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
(109 | ) | 57 | 109 | 135 | |||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
1,236 | 2,492 | 3,017 | 4,846 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(266 | ) | (255 | ) | (521 | ) | (1,016 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
861 | 2,294 | 2,605 | 3,965 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
2,908 | 3,239 | 5,819 | 6,480 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
1,513 | 2,076 | 2,414 | 4,408 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
82 | (37 | ) | (39 | ) | (87 | ) | |||||||||
TOTAL
|
4,503 | 5,278 | 8,194 | 10,801 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
14,937 | 17,921 | 23,846 | 33,435 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
5,942 | 6,290 | 9,452 | 13,857 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
8,995 | 11,631 | 14,394 | 19,578 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
241 | 241 | 482 | 482 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK
|
$ | 8,754 | $ | 11,390 | $ | 13,912 | $ | 19,096 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
127
(Page left blank
intentionally)
128
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 14,394 | $ | 19,578 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
178 | 2,059 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
16,770 | 16,303 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
(3,596 | ) | 16,878 | |||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
28,382 | (17,115 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
4,886 | 1,206 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(11,896 | ) | 18,311 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
15,094 | (2,285 | ) | |||||
Interest
accrued
|
(437 | ) | (334 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
(6,989 | ) | (16,153 | ) | ||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(9,504 | ) | (6,929 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
3,048 | 3,330 | ||||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(6,493 | ) | 11,516 | |||||
Other
|
950 | (3,529 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
44,787 | 42,836 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(30,063 | ) | (50,770 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
109 | 135 | ||||||
Insurance
proceeds
|
- | 50,953 | ||||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(17,986 | ) | (77,092 | ) | ||||
Change
in other investments - net
|
(3,327 | ) | (3,447 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(51,267 | ) | (80,221 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Retirement
of long term debt
|
(728 | ) | (541 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(8,000 | ) | - | |||||
Preferred
stock
|
(482 | ) | (482 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(28 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in financing activities
|
(9,238 | ) | (1,056 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(15,718 | ) | (38,441 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
137,444 | 92,010 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 121,726 | $ | 53,569 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 4,698 | $ | 10,848 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | (3,212 | ) | $ | 1,270 | |||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
129
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 152 | $ | 1,119 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
121,574 | 136,325 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
121,726 | 137,444 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
35,010 | 53,934 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,145 | ) | (1,112 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
81,553 | 70,608 | ||||||
Other
|
5,829 | 3,270 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
23,164 | 28,107 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
144,411 | 154,807 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
24,736 | 21,827 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
3,312 | 8,198 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
9,809 | 9,472 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
10,428 | 4,483 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
314,422 | 336,231 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
3,259 | 3,259 | ||||||
Non-utility
property at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,016 | 1,016 | ||||||
Other
property and investments
|
6,205 | 2,878 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
10,480 | 7,153 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
729,964 | 767,327 | ||||||
Natural
gas
|
196,697 | 197,231 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
68,819 | 22,314 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
995,480 | 986,872 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
514,065 | 542,499 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
481,415 | 444,373 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
4,080 | - | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
148,546 | 208,524 | ||||||
Other
|
7,411 | 7,254 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
160,037 | 215,778 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 966,354 | $ | 1,003,535 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
130
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
$ | 22,349 | $ | 24,523 | ||||
Other
|
21,415 | 39,327 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
19,806 | 18,944 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
35,440 | 20,346 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
10,062 | 7,387 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
3,493 | 3,930 | ||||||
Other
|
5,119 | 9,203 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
117,684 | 123,660 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
72,665 | 112,827 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
2,311 | 2,471 | ||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory liability - net
|
60,460 | 72,046 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
45,439 | 12,040 | ||||||
Retirement
cost liability
|
3,068 | 2,966 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
13,657 | 10,609 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
47,542 | 49,322 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
272,249 | 272,973 | ||||||
Gas
system rebuild insurance proceeds
|
88,828 | 98,418 | ||||||
Other
|
5,333 | 14,997 | ||||||
TOTAL
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
611,552 | 648,669 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock without sinking fund
|
19,780 | 19,780 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000
|
||||||||
shares;
issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2009
|
||||||||
and
2008
|
33,744 | 33,744 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
36,294 | 36,294 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
147,300 | 141,388 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
217,338 | 211,426 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 966,354 | $ | 1,003,535 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
131
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 32 | $ | 38 | $ | (6 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
36 | 47 | (11 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
8 | 12 | (4 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
14 | 19 | (5 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
90 | 116 | (26 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
20 | 67 | (47 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
- | 2 | (2 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
9 | 10 | (1 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 119 | $ | 195 | $ | (76 | ) | (39 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
336 | 322 | 14 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
439 | 452 | (13 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
134 | 139 | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
192 | 192 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
1,101 | 1,105 | (4 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
378 | 478 | (100 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
2 | 7 | (5 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
1,481 | 1,590 | (109 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 67 | $ | 71 | $ | (4 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
75 | 87 | (12 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
17 | 22 | (5 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
30 | 35 | (5 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
189 | 215 | (26 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
51 | 103 | (52 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
- | 2 | (2 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
6 | 15 | (9 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 246 | $ | 335 | $ | (89 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
669 | 628 | 41 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
844 | 860 | (16 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
247 | 270 | (23 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
374 | 370 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
2,134 | 2,128 | 6 | - | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
866 | 804 | 62 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
10 | 10 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
3,010 | 2,942 | 68 | 2 | ||||||||||||
132
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Hurricane Ike and Hurricane
Gustav
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to Entergy Texas' service
territory in September 2008. In April 2009 a law was enacted in Texas
that authorizes recovery of these types of costs by
securitization. Entergy Texas filed its storm cost recovery case in
April 2009 seeking a determination that $577.5 million of Hurricane Ike and
Hurricane Gustav restoration costs are recoverable, including estimated costs
for work to be completed. On August 5, 2009, Entergy Texas submitted
to the ALJ an unopposed settlement agreement that will, if approved resolve all
issues in the storm cost recovery case. Under the terms of the
agreement $566.4 million, plus carrying costs, are eligible for
recovery. In addition, $70 million in anticipated insurance proceeds
will be credited as an offset to the securitized amount, subject to true-up
based on actual proceeds received. Of the $11.1 million difference
between Entergy Texas' request and the amount agreed to, which is part of the
black box agreement and not directly attributable to any specific individual
issues raised, $6.8 million is operation and maintenance expense for which
Entergy Texas has recorded a charge in the second quarter 2009. The
remaining $4.3 million will be recorded as utility plant. The PUCT is
expected to consider the agreement at its August 13, 2009, meeting.
On July 16, 2009, Entergy Texas also
made its financing request filing seeking approval to recover its approved
costs, plus carrying costs, by securitization. A prehearing
conference was held on August 4, 2009, and the ALJ ordered a procedural schedule
that includes a September 25, 2009 hearing date.
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net income decreased by $16.2 million
primarily due to lower net revenue, higher other operation and maintenance
expenses, and higher interest and other charges, partially offset by higher
other income.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net income decreased by $17.7 million
primarily due to lower net revenue, higher other operation and maintenance
expenses, and higher interest and other charges, partially offset by higher
other income.
Net
Revenue
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the second quarter 2009 to the second quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$120.4
|
|
Rough
production cost equalization
|
(18.6)
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
5.7
|
|
Other
|
1.6
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$109.1
|
133
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
As discussed further in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the rough production cost equalization variance is due to
an additional $18.6 million allocation of 2007 rough production cost
equalization receipts ordered by the PUCT to Texas retail customers over what
was originally allocated to Entergy Texas prior to the jurisdictional separation
of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas, effective December 2007.
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to rate increases effective late-January 2009. See Note
2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate
increases.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $108.3 million in fuel cost recovery revenues
primarily attributable to lower fuel rates and a decrease in affiliated
wholesale revenue of $85.9 million due to a decrease in the average price of
energy available for resale sales.
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to decreases in the average market prices of natural gas
and purchased power, partially offset by an increase in deferred fuel expense
due to fuel and purchased power expense decreases in excess of lower fuel cost
recovery revenues.
Other regulatory charges increased
primarily due to rough production cost equalization charges as described
above.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2009 to the six months ended June 30,
2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$217.9
|
|
Rough
production cost equalization
|
(18.6)
|
|
Reserve
equalization
|
(5.2)
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
12.1
|
|
Other
|
1.6
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$207.8
|
As discussed further in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the rough production cost equalization variance is due to
an additional $18.6 million allocation of 2007 rough production cost
equalization receipts ordered by the PUCT to Texas retail customers over what
was originally allocated to Entergy Texas prior to the jurisdictional separation
of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas, effective December 2007.
The reserve equalization variance is
primarily due to increased reserve equalization expense related to changes in
the Entergy System generation mix compared to the same period in
2008.
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to rate increases effective late-January 2009. See Note
2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate
increases.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease in affiliated wholesale revenue of $123.9 million
due to a decrease in the average price of
134
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
energy
available for resale sales and a decrease of $52 million in fuel cost recovery
revenues primarily attributable to lower fuel rates, partially offset by the
interim fuel refund in the first quarter 2008. The interim refund and
the PUCT approval is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K.
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power, partially offset by an
increase in deferred fuel expense due to fuel and purchased power expense
decreases in excess of lower fuel cost recovery revenues.
Other
regulatory charges increased primarily due to rough production cost equalization
charges as described above.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Second Quarter 2009 Compared
to Second Quarter 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $6.8 million due to the Hurricane Ike and Hurricane Gustav
storm cost recovery settlement agreement, as discussed above under Hurricane
Ike and Hurricane Gustav;
|
·
|
an
increase of $4.3 million in fossil expenses primarily due to higher plant
maintenance costs and plant outages;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $1.4 million in customer service costs primarily as a result
of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
|
Other income increased primarily due to
carrying charges on Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs as authorized by Texas
legislation in the second quarter 2009, partially offset by a decrease in taxes
collected on advances for transmission projects which is offset in income tax
expense and a decrease in interest earned on money pool
investments.
Interest and other charges increased
primarily due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding and higher interest
on deferred fuel costs.
Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $6.8 million due to the Hurricane Ike and Hurricane Gustav
storm cost recovery settlement agreement, as discussed above under Hurricane
Ike and Hurricane Gustav;
|
·
|
an
increase of $4.2 million in fossil expenses primarily due to higher plant
maintenance costs and plant
outages;
|
·
|
an
increase of $2.0 million in customer service costs primarily as a result
of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts;
|
·
|
an
increase of $1.7 million in transmission spending for transmission
equalization expenses and costs related to the Independent Coordinator of
Transmission;
|
·
|
an
increase of $1.5 million in local easement fees as the result of higher
gross revenues in certain locations within the Texas jurisdiction;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $1.2 million in legal spending due to increased litigation and
legal fees.
|
Other income increased primarily due to
carrying charges on Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs as authorized by Texas
legislation in the second quarter 2009 and an increase in the allowance for
equity funds used during construction due to more construction work in progress
due to the effects of Hurricane Ike. The increase was partially
offset by a decrease in taxes collected on advances for transmission projects
and a decrease in interest earned on money pool investments.
135
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Interest and other charges increased
primarily due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding and higher interest
on deferred fuel costs.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 54.3%
for the second quarter 2009 and 46.8% for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The differences in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to book and tax differences related to
state income taxes, payroll- and benefits-related items, and utility plant
items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the allowance for
equity funds used during construction and the amortization of investment tax
credits.
The effective income tax rate was 37.5%
for the second quarter 2008 and 37.3% for the six months ended June 30,
2008. The differences in the effective income tax rate for the second
quarter 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset
by an adjustment to the provision for uncertain tax positions.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$2,239
|
$297,082
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
(26,998)
|
(13,383)
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(145,929)
|
60,404
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
246,220
|
(321,354)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
73,293
|
(274,333)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$75,532
|
$22,749
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash flow used in operating
activities increased $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to Hurricane Ike
restoration spending, partially offset by increased recovery of deferred fuel
costs and the timing of the collection of receivables from
customers. The increased fuel recovery was primarily caused by the
$71 million fuel cost over-recovery refund in 2008 that is discussed in Note 2
to the financial statements in the Form 10-K, in addition to the over-recovery
of fuel costs in 2009 compared to 2008.
Investing
Activities
Investing activities used cash of
$145.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to providing cash
of $60.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to money
pool activity and increased construction expenditures due to Hurricane
Ike. Increases in Entergy Texas' receivable from the money pool are a
use of cash flow, and Entergy Texas' receivable from the money pool increased by
$48.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to decreasing by
$104.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The money pool
is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility
subsidiaries' need for external short-term borrowings.
136
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Financing
Activities
Financing activities provided cash of
$246.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to using cash of
$321.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due
to:
·
|
the
issuance of $500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds in January
2009;
|
·
|
the
issuance of $150 million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds in May
2009;
|
·
|
$150
million of capital returned to Entergy Corporation in February 2008 as
discussed in the Form 10-K; and
|
·
|
the
retirement of $80 million of long-term debt in 2009 compared to $159.2
million in 2008.
|
The cash
provided was partially offset by:
·
|
the
repayment of Entergy Texas' $160 million note payable from Entergy
Corporation in January 2009;
|
·
|
the
repayment of $100 million outstanding on Entergy Texas' credit facility in
February 2009; and
|
·
|
money
pool activity.
|
Decreases
in Entergy Texas' payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy
Texas' payable to the money pool decreased by $50.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Capital
Structure
Entergy Texas' capitalization is
balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following
table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Texas as
of June 30, 2009 is primarily due to the issuance of $500 million 7.125% Series
Mortgage Bonds in January 2009 and the issuance of $150 million 7.875% Series
Mortgage Bonds in May 2009, partially offset by the repayment of Entergy Texas'
$160 million note payable from Entergy Corporation in January 2009, the
repayment of $100 million outstanding on Entergy Texas' credit facility in
February 2009, and the retirement of $80 million of long-term debt prior to
maturity.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
63.4%
|
59.9%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.0%
|
0.0%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
64.4%
|
59.9%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion and
also including the debt assumption liability. Capital consists of
debt and shareholder's equity. Net capital consists of capital less
cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Texas uses the net debt to net
capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides
useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas'
financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy
Texas' uses and sources of capital. Following are updates to the
information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy
Texas' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as
follows:
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$48,363
|
($50,794)
|
$49,920
|
$154,176
|
137
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
See Note 4 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $100 million scheduled to expire in
August 2012. No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of
June 30, 2009.
In December 2008, Entergy Texas
borrowed $160 million from its parent company, Entergy Corporation, under a $300
million revolving credit facility pursuant to an Inter-Company Credit Agreement
between Entergy Corporation and Entergy Texas. This borrowing would
have matured on December 3, 2013. Entergy Texas used the proceeds,
together with other available corporate funds, to pay at maturity the portion of
the $350 million Floating Rate series of First Mortgage Bonds due December 2008
that had been assumed by Entergy Texas, and that bond series is no longer
outstanding. In January 2009, Entergy Texas repaid its $160 million
note payable to Entergy Corporation with the proceeds from the bond issuance
discussed below.
In January
2009, Entergy Texas issued $500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds due
February 2019. Entergy Texas used a portion of the proceeds to repay its $160
million note payable to Entergy Corporation, to repay the $100 million
outstanding on its credit facility, to repay short-term borrowings under the
Entergy System money pool, and to repay prior to maturity the following
obligations that had been assumed by Entergy Texas under the debt assumption
agreement with Entergy Gulf States Louisiana:
Governmental
Bonds share assumed under debt assumption agreement:
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
||
6.75%
Series due 2012, Calcasieu Parish
|
$22,115
|
|
6.7%
Series due 2013, Point Coupee Parish
|
$7,990
|
|
7.0%
Series due 2015, West Feliciana Parish
|
$22,400
|
|
6.6%
Series due 2028, West Feliciana Parish
|
$18,320
|
Entergy
Texas used the remaining proceeds for other general corporate
purposes.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas issued $150
million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds due June 2039. Entergy Texas
intends to use the proceeds to repay on or prior to maturity $100,509,000 of the
Floating Rate Series Mortgage Bonds due December 2009 that had been assumed by
Entergy Texas under the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and for other general corporate purposes. A portion of the
net proceeds were used to repay borrowings from the Entergy System money pool
and invested in temporary cash investments and the Entergy System money
pool.
Pension
Contributions
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Transition to Retail
Competition in Texas
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Transition
to Retail Competition in Texas" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of
electric restructuring activity that involves Entergy Texas. In June
2009, a law was enacted in Texas that requires Entergy Texas to cease all
activities relating to Entergy Texas' transition to competition. The
law allows Entergy Texas to remain a part of the SERC Region, although it does
not prevent Entergy Texas from
joining the Southwest Power Pool. The law provides that any further
proceedings to certify a power region that Entergy Texas belongs to as a
qualified power region can be initiated by the PUCT, or on motion by another
party, when the conditions supporting such a proceeding exist. Under
the new law, the PUCT may not approve a transition to competition plan for
Entergy Texas until the expiration of four years from the PUCT's certification
of Entergy Texas' power region. In response to the new law, Entergy
Texas in June 2009 gave notice to the PUCT of the withdrawal of its transition
to competition plan, and requested that its transition to competition proceeding
be dismissed. In July 2009 the ALJ dismissed the
proceeding.
138
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
The new law also contains provisions
that allow Entergy Texas to be included in a cost recovery mechanism that
permits annual filings for the recovery of reasonable and necessary expenditures
for transmission infrastructure improvement and changes in wholesale
transmission charges. This mechanism was previously available to
other non-ERCOT Texas utility companies, but not to Entergy Texas.
The new law further amends already
existing law that had required Entergy Texas to propose for PUCT approval a
tariff to allow eligible customers the ability to contract for competitive
generation. The amending language in the new law provides, among
other things, that: 1) the tariff shall not be implemented in a
manner that
harms the sustainability or competitiveness of manufacturers who choose not to
participate in the tariff; 2) Entergy Texas shall "purchase competitive
generation service, selected by the customer, and provide the generation at
retail to the customer" and 3) Entergy Texas shall provide and price
transmission service and ancillary services under that tariff at a rate that is
unbundled from its cost of service. The new law directs that the PUCT
may not issue an order on the tariff that is contrary to an applicable decision,
rule, or policy statement of a federal regulatory agency having
jurisdiction. Entergy Texas has thus far not made a filing with the
PUCT in response to the newly adopted law addressing the tariff. The
new law provides that the PUCT shall approve, reject, or modify the proposed
tariff not later than September 1, 2010.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and
local rate regulation. Following are updates to that
discussion.
PUCT
Proceedings
In January 2008, Entergy Texas made a
compliance filing with the PUCT describing how its 2007 Rough Production Cost
Equalization receipts under the System Agreement were allocated between Entergy
Gulf States, Inc.'s Texas and Louisiana jurisdictions. A hearing was
held at the end of July 2008, and in October 2008 the ALJ issued a proposal for
decision recommending an additional $18.6 million allocation to Texas retail
customers. The PUCT adopted the ALJ's proposal for decision in
December 2008. Because the PUCT allocation to Texas retail customers
is inconsistent with the LPSC allocation to Louisiana retail customers, adoption
of the proposal for decision by the PUCT could result in trapped costs between
the Texas and Louisiana jurisdictions with no mechanism for
recovery. The PUCT denied Entergy Texas' motion for rehearing and
Entergy Texas commenced proceedings in both state and federal district courts
seeking to reverse the PUCT's decision. On May 12, 2009, certain
defendants, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the PUCT, filed a
motion to dismiss Entergy Texas' pending complaint before the U.S. District
Court for the Western District of Texas. The federal proceeding,
including a ruling on the motion to dismiss, has been abated pending further
action by the FERC in the proceeding discussed below.
Entergy Texas also filed with the FERC
a proposed amendment to the System Agreement bandwidth formula to specifically
calculate the payments to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.'s rough production cost equalization receipts for
2007. On May 8, 2009, the FERC issued an order rejecting the proposed
amendment, stating, among other things, that the FERC does not have jurisdiction
over the allocation of an individual utility's receipts/payments
among or between its retail jurisdictions and that this was a matter for the
courts to review in the pending proceedings noted above. Because of
the FERC's order, Entergy Texas recorded the effects of the PUCT's allocation of
the additional $18.6 million to retail customers in the second quarter of
2009. On an after-tax basis, the charge to earnings was approximately
$13.0 million (including interest). Entergy requested rehearing of
the FERC's order, and on July 8, 2009, the FERC granted the request for
rehearing for the limited purpose of affording more time for consideration of
Entergy's request.
139
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
In May 2009, Entergy Texas filed with
the PUCT a request to refund $46.1 million, including interest, of fuel cost
recovery over-collections through February 2009. Entergy Texas
requested that the proposed refund be made over a four-month period beginning
June 2009. Pursuant to a stipulation among the various parties, in
June 2009 the PUCT issued an order approving a refund of $59.2 million,
including interest, of fuel cost recovery overcollections through March
2009. The refund will be made over a three-month period beginning
July 2009.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
Texas made a rate filing in September 2007 with the PUCT requesting an annual
rate increase totaling $107.5 million, including a base rate increase of $64.3
million and riders totaling $43.2 million. On December 16, 2008,
Entergy Texas filed a term sheet that reflected a settlement agreement that
included the PUCT Staff and the other active participants in the rate
case. On December 19, 2008, the ALJs approved Entergy Texas' request
to implement interim rates reflecting the agreement. The agreement
includes a $46.7 million base rate increase, among other
provisions. Under the ALJs' interim order, Entergy Texas implemented
interim rates, subject to refund and surcharge, reflecting the rates established
through the settlement. These rates became effective with
bills
rendered on and after January 28, 2009, for usage on and after December 19,
2008. In addition, the existing recovery mechanism for incremental
purchased power capacity costs ceased as of January 28, 2009, with purchased
power capacity costs then subsumed within the base rates set in this
proceeding. Certain Texas municipalities exercised their original
jurisdiction and took final action to approve rates consistent with the interim
rates approved by the ALJs. In March 2009, the PUCT approved the
settlement, which made the interim rates final, and this PUCT decision is now
final and non-appealable.
Federal
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Federal
Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of "System Agreement
Proceedings," "Transmission," and
"Interconnection
Orders."
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Industrial
and Commercial Customers" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial
and commercial customers.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Texas' accounting for the application of SFAS
71, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement
benefits.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries' Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
140
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 377,319 | $ | 565,349 | $ | 790,793 | $ | 962,391 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
102,900 | 158,288 | 269,832 | 227,182 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
138,160 | 280,189 | 279,417 | 505,593 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
60,109 | 46,254 | 105,629 | 84,675 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
48 | 46 | 96 | 91 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
13,821 | 12,944 | 27,942 | 26,544 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
18,680 | 18,872 | 37,203 | 37,237 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
27,167 | 6,518 | 33,787 | 11,697 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
360,885 | 523,111 | 753,906 | 893,019 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
16,434 | 42,238 | 36,887 | 69,372 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
1,149 | 402 | 3,519 | 978 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
21,724 | 1,346 | 28,448 | 5,553 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(313 | ) | 9,276 | 994 | 11,086 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
22,560 | 11,024 | 32,961 | 17,617 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
24,435 | 18,545 | 45,947 | 38,507 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
3,764 | 698 | 4,059 | 2,575 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(531 | ) | (230 | ) | (1,719 | ) | (557 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
27,668 | 19,013 | 48,287 | 40,525 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
11,326 | 34,249 | 21,561 | 46,464 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
6,154 | 12,833 | 10,086 | 17,336 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 5,172 | $ | 21,416 | $ | 11,475 | $ | 29,128 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
141
(Page left blank
intentionally)
142
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 11,475 | $ | 29,128 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Reserve
for regulatory adjustments
|
- | 188 | ||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
33,787 | 11,697 | ||||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
37,299 | 37,328 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
(34,723 | ) | (1,695 | ) | ||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
123,816 | (22,625 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
(5,221 | ) | (2,385 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
(84,815 | ) | 168,607 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
(49,595 | ) | 10,907 | |||||
Interest
accrued
|
14,303 | (5,735 | ) | |||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
108,688 | (130,734 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(20,771 | ) | (25,115 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(2,905 | ) | 1,208 | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(211,089 | ) | 17,342 | |||||
Other
|
52,753 | (101,499 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow used in operating activities
|
(26,998 | ) | (13,383 | ) | ||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(104,047 | ) | (53,993 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
3,519 | 978 | ||||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(48,363 | ) | 104,256 | |||||
Changes
in transition charge account
|
2,962 | 9,171 | ||||||
Other
|
- | (8 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(145,929 | ) | 60,404 | |||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
637,692 | - | ||||||
Return
of capital to parent
|
- | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(79,978 | ) | (159,232 | ) | ||||
Changes
in money pool payable - net
|
(50,794 | ) | - | |||||
Repayment
of loan from Entergy Corporation
|
(160,000 | ) | - | |||||
Changes
in credit borrowings - net
|
(100,000 | ) | - | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(700 | ) | (12,000 | ) | ||||
Other
|
- | (122 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
246,220 | (321,354 | ) | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
73,293 | (274,333 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,239 | 297,082 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 75,532 | $ | 22,749 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 33,881 | $ | 44,855 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 6,000 | $ | 6,493 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
143
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 191 | $ | 2,201 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
75,341 | 38 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
75,532 | 2,239 | ||||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
9,100 | 12,062 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
58,518 | 82,583 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(935 | ) | (1,001 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
201,241 | 258,629 | ||||||
Other
|
6,586 | 14,122 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
43,732 | 30,262 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
309,142 | 384,595 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
- | 21,179 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
83,870 | 88,611 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
62,866 | 57,645 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
29,116 | 36,329 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
10,425 | 12,785 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
580,051 | 615,445 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investments
in affiliates - at equity
|
835 | 845 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,642 | 1,788 | ||||||
Other
|
18,127 | 17,451 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
20,604 | 20,084 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
3,078,987 | 2,912,972 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
112,511 | 221,387 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
3,191,498 | 3,134,359 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,098,438 | 1,104,116 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
2,093,060 | 2,030,243 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
87,619 | 84,997 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
1,119,270 | 1,117,257 | ||||||
Long-term
receivables
|
559 | 559 | ||||||
Other
|
56,093 | 116,186 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,263,541 | 1,318,999 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 3,957,256 | $ | 3,984,771 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
144
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing portion of debt assumption liability
|
$ | 100,509 | $ | 100,509 | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
63,273 | 144,662 | ||||||
Other
|
77,860 | 342,449 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
40,454 | 40,589 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
- | 49,595 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
36,405 | 22,102 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
87,509 | - | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
1,269 | 1,269 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
186,354 | 214,315 | ||||||
Other
|
2,303 | 4,551 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
595,936 | 920,041 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
719,984 | 756,996 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
23,330 | 24,128 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
20,097 | - | ||||||
Asset
retirement cost liabilities
|
3,346 | 3,250 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
10,031 | 12,936 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
83,437 | 91,316 | ||||||
Note
payable to Entergy Corporation
|
- | 160,000 | ||||||
Long-term
debt - assumption liability
|
598,637 | 669,462 | ||||||
Other
long-term debt
|
952,233 | 414,906 | ||||||
Other
|
39,301 | 31,587 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
2,450,396 | 2,164,581 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
49,452 | 49,452 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
481,994 | 481,994 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
379,478 | 368,703 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
910,924 | 900,149 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
$ | 3,957,256 | $ | 3,984,771 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
145
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIAIRES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS AND PAID-IN CAPITAL
|
||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 374,606 | $ | 330,520 | ||||
Add:
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
5,172 | 21,416 | ||||||
5,172 | 21,416 | |||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
300 | 12,000 | ||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 379,478 | $ | 339,936 | ||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 481,994 | ||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Return
of capital to parent
|
- | - | ||||||
Paid-in
capital - End of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 481,994 | ||||
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 368,703 | $ | 322,808 | ||||
Add:
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
11,475 | 29,128 | ||||||
11,475 | 29,128 | |||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
700 | 12,000 | ||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 379,478 | $ | 339,936 | ||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 631,994 | ||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Return
of capital to parent
|
- | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Paid-in
capital - End of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 481,994 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
146
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 120 | $ | 149 | $ | (29 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
86 | 110 | (24 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
87 | 135 | (48 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
6 | 8 | (2 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
299 | 402 | (103 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
57 | 143 | (86 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
1 | 3 | (2 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
20 | 17 | 3 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 377 | $ | 565 | $ | (188 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,162 | 1,232 | (70 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
994 | 1,042 | (48 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,393 | 1,607 | (214 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
61 | 62 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
3,610 | 3,943 | (333 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
955 | 1,079 | (124 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
12 | 29 | (17 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
4,577 | 5,051 | (474 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 259 | $ | 260 | $ | (1 | ) | - | ||||||||
Commercial
|
184 | 187 | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
191 | 239 | (48 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
12 | 13 | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
646 | 699 | (53 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
115 | 239 | (124 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
2 | 5 | (3 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
28 | 19 | 9 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 791 | $ | 962 | $ | (171 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
2,341 | 2,444 | (103 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,922 | 1,985 | (63 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
2,709 | 3,151 | (442 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
121 | 123 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
7,093 | 7,703 | (610 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
1,843 | 1,976 | (133 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
41 | 51 | (10 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
8,977 | 9,730 | (753 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
147
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
System
Energy's principal asset consists of a 90% ownership and leasehold interest in
Grand Gulf. The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold
under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New
Orleans. System Energy's operating revenues are derived from the
allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90%
interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales
Agreement. Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System
Energy's only source of operating revenues.
Net
income remained relatively flat, increasing $1.6 million for the second quarter
2009 and $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same periods in 2008. Losses realized on System Energy's
decommissioning trust funds in the second quarter 2009 were offset by
corresponding regulatory credits in accordance with regulatory
treatment.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$102,788
|
$105,005
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
112,296
|
97,862
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(56,142)
|
(84,271)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(67,855)
|
(71,901)
|
|||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(11,701)
|
(58,310)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$91,087
|
$46,695
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash provided by operating
activities increased $14.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to a decrease of
$8.9 million in income tax payments.
Investing
Activities
Net cash
used in investing activities decreased $28.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to
money pool activity. Increases in System Energy's receivable from the
money pool are a use of cash flow, and System Energy's receivable from the money
pool increased by $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
to an increase of $47.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008.
148
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Capital
Structure
System
Energy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
46.6%
|
48.2%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
2.8%
|
3.0%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
49.4%
|
51.2%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common
shareholder's equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and
cash equivalents. System Energy uses the net debt to net capital
ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful
information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy's
financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of System Energy's uses and sources of capital. The
following are updates to the Form 10-K.
As discussed in the Form 10-K as a
potential use of capital, System Energy plans a 178 MW uprate of the Grand Gulf
nuclear plant. The project is expected to cost $575
million. On May 22, 2009, a petition and supporting testimony were
filed at the MPSC requesting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
for implementation of the uprate. The City of New Orleans is the only
party that has intervened in the case. No procedural schedule has
been set for the case.
System
Energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows:
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
June
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$57,000
|
$42,915
|
$101,497
|
$53,620
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS – Nuclear
Matters" in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Environmental
Risks" in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
149
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in System Energy's accounting for nuclear
decommissioning costs and qualified pension and other postretirement
benefits.
Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs
In the second quarter 2009, System
Energy recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for
Grand Gulf as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The
revised estimate resulted in a $4.2 million reduction in its decommissioning
liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related regulatory
asset.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
150
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 130,387 | $ | 128,366 | $ | 257,759 | $ | 242,738 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
15,561 | 12,688 | 31,328 | 23,304 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
4,820 | 4,209 | 9,587 | 8,413 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
33,110 | 32,008 | 58,465 | 56,997 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
7,360 | 6,847 | 14,589 | 13,571 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
6,323 | 6,101 | 12,506 | 4,029 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
24,868 | 24,522 | 52,161 | 51,077 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(7,777 | ) | (2,571 | ) | (10,481 | ) | (4,557 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
84,265 | 83,804 | 168,155 | 152,834 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
46,122 | 44,562 | 89,604 | 89,904 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
4,713 | 1,237 | 6,614 | 2,366 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income (loss)
|
(1,761 | ) | 3,665 | 1,556 | 6,212 | |||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(90 | ) | (121 | ) | (262 | ) | (288 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,862 | 4,781 | 7,908 | 8,290 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
11,145 | 11,321 | 22,356 | 23,283 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
108 | 37 | 127 | 80 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(1,578 | ) | (415 | ) | (2,217 | ) | (793 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
9,675 | 10,943 | 20,266 | 22,570 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
39,309 | 38,400 | 77,246 | 75,624 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
15,616 | 16,309 | 31,160 | 31,932 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 23,693 | $ | 22,091 | $ | 46,086 | $ | 43,692 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
151
(Page left blank
intentionally)
152
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 46,086 | $ | 43,692 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(10,481 | ) | (4,557 | ) | ||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
66,750 | 64,648 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
9,432 | (3,659 | ) | |||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
4,270 | 16,909 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,604 | (11,747 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
4,377 | - | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
(37,088 | ) | (34,959 | ) | ||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
3,420 | 1,713 | ||||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(99 | ) | (488 | ) | ||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(16,761 | ) | (5,679 | ) | ||||
Other
|
40,786 | 31,989 | ||||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
112,296 | 97,862 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(36,678 | ) | (23,966 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
6,614 | 2,366 | ||||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
322,003 | 176,470 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(334,176 | ) | (191,266 | ) | ||||
Changes
in money pool receivable - net
|
(14,085 | ) | (47,878 | ) | ||||
Other
|
180 | 3 | ||||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(56,142 | ) | (84,271 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(28,440 | ) | (26,701 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(36,500 | ) | (45,200 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(2,915 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash flow used in financing activities
|
(67,855 | ) | (71,901 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(11,701 | ) | (58,310 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
102,788 | 105,005 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 91,087 | $ | 46,695 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 88,615 | $ | 55,753 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 7,136 | $ | 16,072 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
153
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 22 | $ | 250 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
91,065 | 102,538 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
91,087 | 102,788 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
100,127 | 91,119 | ||||||
Other
|
3,881 | 3,074 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
104,008 | 94,193 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
77,458 | 74,496 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
16,775 | 26,485 | ||||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
70,402 | 74,779 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
4,321 | 993 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
364,051 | 373,734 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
280,863 | 268,822 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
25,560 | 25,560 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
306,423 | 294,382 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
3,312,638 | 3,314,473 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
479,933 | 479,933 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
157,680 | 122,952 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
101,176 | 125,416 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
5,477 | 7,448 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
4,056,904 | 4,050,222 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
2,259,829 | 2,206,780 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
1,797,075 | 1,843,442 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
SFAS
109 regulatory asset - net
|
95,684 | 89,473 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
339,427 | 333,389 | ||||||
Other
|
12,686 | 10,970 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
447,797 | 433,832 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 2,915,346 | $ | 2,945,390 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
154
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 41,715 | $ | 28,440 | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
4,361 | 2,723 | ||||||
Other
|
35,181 | 35,215 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
5,893 | 9,645 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
11,502 | 48,590 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
37,619 | 37,619 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
136,271 | 162,232 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
381,574 | 365,134 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
59,969 | 61,708 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
63,557 | 87,797 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
226,156 | 197,051 | ||||||
Decommissioning
|
406,546 | 396,201 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
1,926 | 2,025 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
70,204 | 72,008 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
703,223 | 744,900 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,913,155 | 1,926,824 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
789,350 | 789,350 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
76,570 | 66,984 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
865,920 | 856,334 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
$ | 2,915,346 | $ | 2,945,390 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
155
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
See "PART I, Item 1, Litigation"
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory
proceedings affecting Entergy, and also see "Item 5, Other Information,
Environmental
Regulation",
below, for updates regarding environmental proceedings and
regulation.
Ratepayer
Lawsuits
Entergy
New Orleans Fuel Adjustment Clause Litigation
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed by a group of ratepayers in
April 1999 against Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
and Entergy Power in state court in Orleans Parish purportedly on behalf of all
Entergy New Orleans ratepayers. In February 2004, the City Council
approved a resolution that resulted in a refund to customers of $11.3 million,
including interest, during the months of June through September
2004. In May 2005 the Civil District Court for the Parish of
Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution, finding no support for the
plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be higher. In
June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the
Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. On February 25, 2008, the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision affirming in part, and
reversing in part, the Civil District Court's decision. Although the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal did not reverse any of the substantive findings
and conclusions of the City Council or the Civil District Court, the Fourth
Circuit found that the amount of the refund was arbitrary and capricious and
increased the amount of the refund to $34.3 million. In April 2009 the
Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision of the Civil District
Court. On April 17, 2009, the plaintiffs requested rehearing by the
Louisiana Supreme Court. On May 29, 2009, the Louisiana Supreme Court
denied the request for rehearing.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in "PART I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors" in the Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities (1)
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid
per
Share
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of a
Publicly
Announced
Plan
|
Maximum
$
Amount
of
Shares that May
Yet
be Purchased
Under
a Plan (2)
|
||||
4/01/2009-4/30/2009
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$596,766,948
|
||||
5/01/2009-5/31/2009
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$596,766,948
|
||||
6/01/2009-6/30/2009
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$596,766,948
|
||||
Total
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
(1)
|
In
accordance with Entergy's stock-based compensation plans, Entergy
periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised
to obtain shares of Entergy's common stock. According to the
plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares
purchased on the open market. Entergy's management has been
authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an
amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the
plans. In addition to this authority, on January 29, 2007, the
Board approved a repurchase program under which Entergy is authorized to
repurchase up to $1.5 billion of its common stock. In January
2008, the Board authorized an incremental $500 million share repurchase
program to enable Entergy to consider opportunistic purchases in response
to equity market conditions. The programs do not have an
expiration date, but Entergy expects to complete both of them in
2009. See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K
for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation
plans.
|
156
(2)
|
Maximum
amount of shares that may yet be repurchased relates only to the $1.5
billion and $500 million plans and does not include an estimate of the
amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of grants
under the stock-based compensation
plans.
|
The
amount of share repurchases may vary as a result of material changes in business
results or capital spending or new investment opportunities.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Election of Board of
Directors
Entergy
Corporation
The annual meeting of stockholders of
Entergy Corporation was held on May 8, 2009. The following matters
were voted on and received the specified number of votes for, abstentions, votes
withheld (against), and broker non-votes:
1.
|
Election
of Directors:
|
Name of Nominee
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
Abstentions
|
|||
Maureen
S. Bateman
|
166,966,501
|
4,912,044
|
507,386
|
|||
W.
Frank Blount
|
164,080,410
|
7,876,605
|
428,915
|
|||
Gary
W. Edwards
|
160,317,898
|
11,561,364
|
506,669
|
|||
Alexis
M. Herman
|
159,434,985
|
12,415,348
|
535,599
|
|||
Donald
C. Hintz
|
167,846,896
|
4,167,060
|
371,975
|
|||
J.
Wayne Leonard
|
166,024,530
|
5,972,453
|
388,948
|
|||
Stuart
L. Levenick
|
167,863,311
|
4,040,428
|
482,192
|
|||
James
R. Nichols
|
167,172,890
|
4,762,373
|
450,668
|
|||
William
A. Percy, II
|
160,892,058
|
11,030,540
|
463,334
|
|||
W.
J. "Billy" Tauzin
|
159,926,875
|
11,899,985
|
559,071
|
|||
Steven
V. Wilkinson
|
167,745,177
|
4,171,917
|
468,837
|
2.
|
Ratify
the appointment of independent public accountants, Deloitte & Touche
LLP for the year 2009 170,786,508 votes for; 1,217,754 votes
against; and 381,669 abstentions.
|
Entergy
Arkansas
A consent in lieu of a meeting of
common stockholders was executed on June 30, 2009. The consent was
signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and
outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such
consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting
the Board of Directors of Entergy Arkansas: Hugh T. McDonald,
Chairman, Leo P. Denault, Mark T. Savoff, and Gary J. Taylor.
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
A consent in lieu of a meeting of
members was executed on June 30, 2009. The consent was signed on
behalf of EGS Holdings, Inc., the holder of all issued and outstanding common
membership interests. The holder of the common membership interests,
by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors
constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana: E. Renae Conley, Chair, Leo P. Denault, Mark T. Savoff,
and Gary J. Taylor.
157
Entergy
Louisiana
A consent in lieu of a meeting of
members was executed on June 30, 2009. The consent was signed on
behalf of Entergy Louisiana Holdings, Inc., the holder of all issued and
outstanding common membership interests. The holder of the common
membership interests, by such consent, elected the following individuals to
serve as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy
Louisiana: E. Renae Conley, Chair, Leo P. Denault, Mark T. Savoff,
and Gary J. Taylor.
Entergy
Mississippi
A consent
in lieu of a meeting of common stockholders was executed on June 30,
2009. The consent was signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the
holder of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The
common stockholder, by such consent, elected the following individuals to serve
as directors constituting the Board of Directors of Entergy Mississippi: Haley
R. Fisackerly, Chairman, Leo P. Denault, Mark T. Savoff, and Gary J.
Taylor.
Entergy
New Orleans
A consent in lieu of a meeting of
common stockholders was executed on June 30, 2009. The consent was
signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and
outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such
consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting
the Board of Directors of Entergy New Orleans: Roderick K. West, Chairman, Gary
J. Taylor, Tracie L. Boutte, and Sherri L. Winslow.
Entergy
Texas
A consent in lieu of a meeting of
common stockholders was executed on June 30, 2009. The consent was
signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and
outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such
consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting
the Board of Directors of Entergy Texas: Joseph F. Domino, Chairman,
Leo P. Denault, Mark T. Savoff, and Gary J. Taylor.
System
Energy
A consent in lieu of a meeting of
common stockholders was executed on June 30, 2009. The consent was
signed on behalf of Entergy Corporation, the holder of all issued and
outstanding shares of common stock. The common stockholder, by such
consent, elected the following individuals to serve as directors constituting
the Board of Directors of System Energy: Michael R. Kansler, Chairman, Steven C.
McNeal, and Leo P. Denault.
Item
5. Other Information
Environmental
Regulation
Clean Air Act and Subsequent
Amendments
Ozone
Nonattainment
As disclosed in the Form 10-K, on March
12, 2008, the EPA revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone,
creating the potential for additional counties and parishes in which Entergy
operates to be placed in nonattainment status. The LDEQ recommended
eleven parishes be designated as nonattainment for the 75 parts per billion
ozone standard. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has two fossil plants
and Entergy Louisiana has one fossil plant affected by this
recommendation. In Arkansas, the Governor recommended that Pulaski
County be designated in nonattainment with the new ozone standard, where two of
Entergy Arkansas' smaller facilities are located. These
recommendations have not been approved yet by the EPA, however, so additional
counties or parishes may be affected. Following nonattainment
designation, states will be required to develop state implementation plans that
outline control requirements that will enable the affected counties and parishes
to reach attainment status. Entergy facilities in these areas may be
subject to installation of NOx controls, but the degree of control
will
158
remain
unknown until the state implementation plans are developed. Entergy
will continue to monitor and engage in the state implementation plan development
process in Entergy states.
Regional
Haze
Entergy Arkansas has withdrawn its
petition (discussed in the Form 10-K) to the Arkansas Commission on
Environmental Quality requesting the revision of Regulation 19, which sets an
operational deadline of September 2013 for the regional haze air emissions
control project at Entergy Arkansas' White Bluff facility. Entergy
Arkansas is proceeding with the regulatory approval process for the installation
and operation of required emission controls.
Potential
Legislative, Regulatory, and Judicial Developments
In April 2009, the EPA issued a
proposal "to find that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere endanger the public
health and welfare of current and future generations" pursuant to section 202(a)
of the Clean Air Act in response to the opinion of the United States Supreme
Court in Massachusetts v.
EPA. The EPA published the proposed endangerment finding in the
Federal Register on April 24, 2009, and began a sixty-day notice and comment
period on the proposal. The current proposal applies directly only to
emissions from mobile sources such as cars and trucks. The proposed
endangerment finding lists six air pollutants, including CO2, that
would undergo further proposed EPA regulation as mobile source emissions under
the federal Clean Air Act. The EPA has stated that the endangerment
finding itself does not create any immediate requirements for any emissions
source, but this regulatory action may lead to the proposal of similar
regulations to control greenhouse gas emissions, including CO2, from
stationary sources such as Entergy's facilities either through new EPA
regulations or through the Clean Air Act's current new source review program,
new source performance standard program, or otherwise. Such a proposal of
new regulations applicable to stationary sources also would undergo a
notice-and-comment rulemaking process through the EPA. Application of the
current new source review program or the new source performance standards
programs to new or modified sources of emissions through state or federal air
permitting programs could occur. Proposed new regulations for stationary
sources could take the form of market-based cap-and-trade programs, direct
requirements for the installation of air emission controls onto air emission
sources, or other or combined regulatory programs. The effect on
Entergy is impossible to estimate at this time due to the uncertainty of the
regulatory format.
Clean Water
Act
316(b)
Cooling Water Intake Structures
The EPA finalized new regulations in
July 2004 governing the intake of water at large existing power plants employing
cooling water intake structures. The rule sought to reduce perceived
impacts on aquatic resources by requiring covered facilities to implement
technology or other measures to meet EPA-targeted reductions in water use and
corresponding perceived aquatic impacts. Entergy, other industry
members and industry groups, environmental groups, and a coalition of
northeastern and mid-Atlantic states challenged various aspects of the
rule. In January 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit remanded the rule to the EPA for reconsideration. The
court instructed the EPA to reconsider several aspects of the rule that were
beneficial to the regulated community after finding that these provisions of the
rule were contrary to the language of the Clean Water Act or were not
sufficiently explained in the rule. In April 2008, the United States
Supreme Court agreed to review the decision of the Second Circuit on the
question of whether the EPA may take into consideration a cost-benefit analysis
in developing these regulations, a consideration of potential benefit to the
regulated community that the Second Circuit disallowed. In March
2009, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners that cost-benefit
analysis may be taken into consideration. The EPA may now reissue a
rule similar in structure to the rule remanded by the Second Circuit, or the EPA
may issue a rule with a substantially different structure and
effect. Until the EPA issues guidance to the regulated community on
what actions should be taken to comply with the Clean Water Act, and until the
form and substance of the new rule itself is determined, it is impossible to
estimate the effect of the Supreme Court's decision on Entergy's
business.
159
In April
2009, Entergy submitted a section 401 water quality certification for Indian
Point to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
(NYSDEC). The certification, or a waiver or exemption of the same, is
required pursuant to section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act as a supporting
document to the NRC's license renewal decision. On May 13, 2009, the
NYSDEC deemed the application incomplete, requested additional information, and
requested that Entergy respond within 120 days or by September 10,
2009. Entergy already has provided some of the requested information
and continues to work with the NYSDEC in order to provide the additional
information before the requested deadline. By law, the NYSDEC must
approve or deny the application within one-year of receipt.
Groundwater at Certain
Nuclear Sites
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
joined other nuclear utilities and the Nuclear Energy Institute in 2006 to
develop a voluntary groundwater monitoring and protection
program. This initiative began after detection of very low levels of
radioactive material, primarily tritium, in groundwater at several plants in the
United States. To date, radionuclides have been detected at Entergy's
Indian Point, Palisades and Pilgrim plants. The situation at Indian
Point is described in the Form 10-K.
At Palisades, Entergy identified
tritium in two monitoring wells in December 2007 due to leakage from the buried
piping for a recirculation line. Non-destructive evaluation of the
line identified one area of leakage and repairs were completed in
2008. Since early 2008, groundwater from three wells has been sampled
and analyzed on a bi-weekly basis. Following the repairs, tritium
declined in all of the wells and trended downward until one well spiked in March
2008. Additional investigation was performed to locate the source,
including installation of eighteen temporary monitoring wells along the path of
the recirculation line. A new leak from a different line was located
and repairs are currently underway. Following repairs, bi-weekly
sampling will continue until the groundwater is below the method detection
limit.
At Pilgrim, six existing monitoring
wells are being sampled and analyzed on a periodic basis. Results
continue to show low levels of tritium. A hydrogeological analysis
will be performed in 2009 to pinpoint the location for six additional wells to
further study the situation. Currently, the detections are believed
to be from wash out of naturally occurring atmospheric
tritium. Precipitation studies are being performed to confirm this
theory.
Other Environmental
Matters
Entergy
Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans
In March 2009, Entergy Louisiana
received a Certificate of Completion from the LDEQ for the former site of the
Southern Transformer Shop, located in Algiers, Orleans Parish. This
document certifies completion of the soil remediation in compliance with
Louisiana's "Voluntary Remediation Program." Prior to the soil
remediation, which was completed in January 2008, a thorough site assessment and
risk evaluation had been performed at the property utilizing Louisiana's Risk
Evaluation and Corrective Action Program.
Entergy
Arkansas
In February 2009, Entergy Arkansas
received notice that the Arkansas Natural Resources Commission has proposed a
rule that would set minimum stream flows for the White River, from which Entergy
Arkansas' Independence generating facility withdraws its cooling water. If
the river reaches the low flow conditions described in the proposed regulation,
at a time when riparian users of the river were withdrawing 300 cubic feet per
second or more, all riparian users of the river other than municipal and
domestic users would be required to cease all withdrawals from the river.
Because current riparian withdrawals do not total 300 cubic feet per second, and
are not expected to reach this level in the near future, the regulation would
have no immediate effect on Independence; however, Entergy Arkansas estimates
that if and when the regulation becomes effective, it could cause Independence
to cease water withdrawals, and thus to cease operation, for as many as 18 days
during an average flow year and for as many as 90 days during a very low flow
year, based on historical flows. Entergy Arkansas has submitted comments
to the agency expressing its concern and the potential costs to customers for
replacement power and will continue to monitor the rule's
development.
160
Earnings
Ratios (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy
Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System
Energy)
The Registrant Subsidiaries have
calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to
combined fixed charges and preferred dividends/distributions pursuant to Item
503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:
Ratios
of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
||||||||||||
Twelve
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
December
31,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
3.37
|
3.75
|
3.37
|
3.19
|
2.33
|
2.18
|
||||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
3.04
|
3.34
|
3.01
|
2.84
|
2.44
|
2.57
|
||||||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
3.60
|
3.50
|
3.23
|
3.44
|
3.14
|
3.16
|
||||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
3.41
|
3.16
|
2.54
|
3.22
|
2.92
|
3.05
|
||||||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
3.60
|
1.22
|
1.52
|
2.74
|
3.71
|
3.58
|
||||||
Entergy
Texas
|
2.07
|
2.06
|
2.12
|
2.07
|
2.04
|
1.66
|
||||||
System
Energy
|
3.95
|
3.85
|
4.05
|
3.95
|
3.29
|
3.48
|
Ratios
of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and
Preferred Dividends/Distributions
|
||||||||||||
Twelve
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
December
31,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
2.98
|
3.34
|
3.06
|
2.88
|
1.95
|
1.75
|
||||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
2.90
|
3.18
|
2.90
|
2.73
|
2.42
|
2.54
|
||||||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
3.60
|
3.50
|
2.90
|
3.08
|
2.87
|
3.12
|
||||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
3.07
|
2.83
|
2.34
|
2.97
|
2.67
|
2.73
|
||||||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
3.31
|
1.12
|
1.35
|
2.54
|
3.45
|
3.24
|
Item
6. Exhibits *
4(a)
-
|
Officer's
Certificate No. 2-B-2 dated May 14, 2009 supplemented to the Entergy
Texas, Inc. Indenture of Trust and Security Agreement dated as of October
1, 2008, establishing the form and certain terms of the Mortgage Bonds,
7.875% Series due June 1, 2039.
|
|
4(b)
-
|
Twenty-sixth
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2009, to the Entergy
Mississippi, Inc. Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of February 1,
1988.
|
|
12(a)
-
|
Entergy
Arkansas' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as
defined.
|
|
12(b)
-
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as
defined.
|
|
12(c)
-
|
Entergy
Louisiana's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as
defined.
|
|
12(d)
-
|
Entergy
Mississippi's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as
defined.
|
|
161
12(e) - | Entergy New Orleans' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined. | |
12(f)
-
|
Entergy
Texas' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as
defined.
|
|
12(g)
-
|
System
Energy's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as
defined.
|
|
31(a)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Corporation.
|
|
31(b)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Corporation.
|
|
31(c)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
31(d)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
31(e)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana.
|
|
31(f)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana.
|
|
31(g)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Louisiana.
|
|
31(h)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Louisiana.
|
|
31(i)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Mississippi.
|
|
31(j)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Mississippi.
|
|
31(k)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New
Orleans.
|
|
31(l)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New
Orleans.
|
|
31(m)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
31(n)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
31(o)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
|
|
31(p)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
|
|
32(a)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
|
|
32(b)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
|
|
32(c)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
32(d)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
32(e)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
|
|
32(f)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
|
|
32(g)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
|
|
32(h)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
|
|
32(i)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
|
|
162
32(j) - | Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi. | |
32(k)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
|
|
32(l)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
|
|
32(m)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
32(n)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
32(o)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for System Energy.
|
|
32(p)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for System
Energy.
|
___________________________
Pursuant
to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish
to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt
that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount
of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the
total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis.
*
|
Reference
is made to a duplicate list of exhibits being filed as a part of this
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, which list,
prepared in accordance with Item 102 of Regulation S-T of the SEC,
immediately precedes the exhibits being filed with this report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009.
|
163
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be
deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its
subsidiaries.
ENTERGY
CORPORATION
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Theodore
H. Bunting, Jr
Senior
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(For
each Registrant and for each as
Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
Date: August
7, 2009
164