ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
|
X
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
OR
|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For
the transition period from ____________ to
____________
|
Commission
File
Number
|
Registrant,
State of Incorporation or Organization,
Address
of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone
Number,
and IRS Employer Identification No.
|
Commission
File
Number
|
Registrant,
State of Incorporation or Organization,
Address
of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone
Number,
and IRS Employer Identification No.
|
|
1-11299
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION
(a
Delaware corporation)
639
Loyola Avenue
New
Orleans, Louisiana 70113
Telephone
(504) 576-4000
72-1229752
|
1-31508
|
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
(a
Mississippi corporation)
308
East Pearl Street
Jackson,
Mississippi 39201
Telephone
(601) 368-5000
64-0205830
|
|
1-10764
|
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
(an
Arkansas corporation)
425
West Capitol Avenue
Little
Rock, Arkansas 72201
Telephone
(501) 377-4000
71-0005900
|
0-05807
|
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
(a
Louisiana corporation)
1600
Perdido Street
New
Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone
(504) 670-3700
72-0273040
|
|
0-20371
|
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
(a
Louisiana limited liability company)
446
North Boulevard
Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70802
Telephone
(800) 368-3749
74-0662730
|
1-34360
|
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC.
(a
Texas corporation)
350
Pine Street
Beaumont,
Texas 77701
Telephone
(409) 981-2000
61-1435798
|
|
1-32718
|
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
(a
Texas limited liability company)
446
North Boulevard
Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70802
Telephone
(800) 368-3749
75-3206126
|
1-09067
|
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
(an
Arkansas corporation)
Echelon
One
1340
Echelon Parkway
Jackson,
Mississippi 39213
Telephone
(601) 368-5000
72-0752777
|
|
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such
reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrants have submitted electronically and posted on Entergy's corporate Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were
required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large
accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule
12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large
accelerated
filer
|
Accelerated
filer
|
Non-
accelerated
filer
|
Smaller
reporting
company
|
|||||
Entergy
Corporation
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
|
Ö
|
|||||||
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
|
Ö
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Common Stock Outstanding
|
Outstanding at October 30,
2009
|
|
Entergy
Corporation
|
($0.01
par value)
|
188,932,291
|
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas,
Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy
Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc. and System
Energy Resources, Inc. separately file this combined Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. Information contained herein relating to any individual company
is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company reports
herein only as to itself and makes no other representations whatsoever as to any
other company. This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
supplements and updates the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year
ended December 31, 2008 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters
ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, filed by the individual registrants with
the SEC, and should be read in conjunction therewith.
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
September
30, 2009
Page Number
|
|
Definitions
|
1
|
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Plan to Pursue Separation of
Non-Utility Nuclear
|
3
|
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike
|
5
|
Entergy Arkansas January 2009
Ice Storm
|
5
|
Results of
Operations
|
6
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
14
|
Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other
Regulation
|
19
|
Market and Credit Risk
Sensitive Instruments
|
23
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
24
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
25
|
Consolidated Statements of
Income
|
27
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
28
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
30
|
Consolidated Statements of
Retained Earnings, Comprehensive Income, and
Paid-In
Capital
|
31
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
34
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
35
|
Part
1. Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
73
|
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
74
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
77
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
80
|
Federal
Regulation
|
81
|
Utility
Restructuring
|
81
|
Nuclear Matters
|
81
|
Environmental
Risks
|
81
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
81
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
82
|
Income
Statements
|
83
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
85
|
Balance Sheets
|
86
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
88
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike
|
89
|
Results of
Operations
|
89
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
92
|
Jurisdictional Separation of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and
Entergy Texas
|
95
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
95
|
Federal
Regulation
|
96
|
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
|
96
|
Nuclear Matters
|
96
|
Environmental
Risks
|
96
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
96
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
96
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
September
30, 2009
Page Number
|
|
Income
Statements
|
97
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
99
|
Balance Sheets
|
100
|
Statements of Members' Equity
and Comprehensive Income
|
102
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
103
|
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike
|
104
|
Results of
Operations
|
104
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
107
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
110
|
Federal
Regulation
|
110
|
Utility
Restructuring
|
110
|
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
|
110
|
Nuclear Matters
|
110
|
Environmental
Risks
|
111
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
111
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
111
|
Income
Statements
|
112
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
113
|
Balance Sheets
|
114
|
Statements of Members' Equity
and Comprehensive Income
|
116
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
117
|
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
118
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
121
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
123
|
Federal
Regulation
|
123
|
Utility
Restructuring
|
123
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
123
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
124
|
Income
Statements
|
125
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
127
|
Balance Sheets
|
128
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
130
|
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
131
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
133
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
135
|
Federal
Regulation
|
136
|
Environmental
Risks
|
136
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
136
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
136
|
Income
Statements
|
137
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
139
|
Balance Sheets
|
140
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
142
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
September
30, 2009
Page Number
|
|
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Hurricane Ike and Hurricane
Gustav
|
143
|
Results of
Operations
|
143
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
146
|
Transition to Retail
Competition in Texas
|
149
|
State and Local Rate
Regulation
|
149
|
Federal
Regulation
|
151
|
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
|
151
|
Environmental
Risks
|
151
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
151
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
151
|
Consolidated Income
Statements
|
152
|
Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
153
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
154
|
Consolidated Statements of
Retained Earnings and Paid-In Capital
|
156
|
Selected Operating
Results
|
157
|
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
|
|
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
|
|
Results of
Operations
|
158
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
158
|
Nuclear Matters
|
160
|
Environmental
Risks
|
160
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
|
160
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
160
|
Income
Statements
|
161
|
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
163
|
Balance Sheets
|
164
|
Part
II. Other Information
|
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
166
|
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
|
166
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use
of Proceeds
|
167
|
Item
5. Other Information
|
167
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
170
|
Signature
|
173
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
In this
combined report and from time to time, Entergy Corporation and the Registrant
Subsidiaries each makes statements as a registrant concerning its expectations,
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or
performance. Such statements are "forward-looking statements" within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Words such as "may," "will," "could," "project," "believe,"
"anticipate," "intend," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "potential," "plan,"
"predict," "forecast," and other similar words or expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements but are not the only means to identify these
statements. Although each of these registrants believes that these
forward-looking statements and the underlying assumptions are reasonable, it
cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct. Any
forward-looking statement is based on information current as of the date of this
combined report and speaks only as of the date on which such statement is
made. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws,
these registrants undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events, or otherwise.
Forward-looking
statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There are
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including those factors
discussed or incorporated by reference in (a) Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Form
10-K, (b) Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and in
this report, and (c) the following factors (in addition to others described
elsewhere in this combined report and in subsequent securities
filings):
·
|
resolution
of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including various
performance-based rate discussions and implementation of legislation
ending the Texas transition to competition, and other regulatory
proceedings, including those related to Entergy's System Agreement,
Entergy's utility supply plan, recovery of storm costs, and recovery of
fuel and purchased power costs
|
·
|
changes
in utility regulation, including the beginning or end of retail and
wholesale competition, the ability to recover net utility assets and other
potential stranded costs, the operations of the independent coordinator of
transmission for Entergy's utility service territory, and the application
of more stringent transmission reliability requirements or market power
criteria by the FERC
|
·
|
changes
in regulation of nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and
fuel, including possible shutdown of nuclear generating facilities,
particularly those owned or operated by the Non-Utility Nuclear
business
|
·
|
resolution
of pending or future applications for license renewals or modifications of
nuclear generating facilities
|
·
|
the
performance of and deliverability of power from Entergy's generating
plants, including the capacity factors at its nuclear generating
facilities
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to develop and execute on a point of view regarding future prices
of electricity, natural gas, and other energy-related
commodities
|
·
|
prices
for power generated by Entergy's merchant generating facilities, the
ability to hedge, sell power forward or otherwise reduce the market price
risk associated with those facilities, including the Non-Utility Nuclear
plants, and the prices and availability of fuel and power Entergy must
purchase for its Utility customers, and Entergy's ability to meet credit
support requirements for fuel and power supply
contracts
|
·
|
volatility
and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, uranium, and other
energy-related commodities
|
·
|
changes
in law resulting from federal or state energy
legislation
|
·
|
changes
in environmental, tax, and other laws, including requirements for reduced
emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, carbon, mercury, and other
substances
|
·
|
uncertainty
regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent
nuclear fuel and nuclear waste storage and
disposal
|
·
|
variations
in weather and the occurrence of hurricanes and other storms and
disasters, including uncertainties associated with efforts to remediate
the effects of hurricanes and ice storms (including most recently,
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike and the January 2009 ice storm in
Arkansas) and recovery of costs associated with restoration, including
accessing funded storm reserves, federal and local cost recovery
mechanisms, securitization, and
insurance
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to manage its capital projects and operation and maintenance
costs
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to purchase and sell assets at attractive prices and on other
attractive terms
|
·
|
the
economic climate, and particularly growth in Entergy's Utility service
territory and the Northeast United
States
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION (Concluded)
·
|
the
effects of Entergy's strategies to reduce tax
payments
|
·
|
changes
in the financial markets, particularly those affecting the availability of
capital and Entergy's ability to refinance existing debt, execute share
repurchase programs, and fund investments and
acquisitions
|
·
|
actions
of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt and preferred
stock, changes in general corporate ratings, and changes in the rating
agencies' ratings criteria
|
·
|
changes
in inflation and interest rates
|
·
|
the
effect of litigation and government investigations or
proceedings
|
·
|
advances
in technology
|
·
|
the
potential effects of threatened or actual terrorism and
war
|
·
|
Entergy's
ability to attract and retain talented management and
directors
|
·
|
changes
in accounting standards and corporate
governance
|
·
|
declines
in the market prices of marketable securities and resulting funding
requirements for Entergy's defined benefit pension and other
postretirement benefit plans
|
·
|
changes
in the results of decommissioning trust fund earnings or in the timing of
or cost to decommission nuclear plant
sites
|
·
|
the
ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition, or divestiture
plans, regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of merger,
acquisition, or divestiture, and the success of the business following a
merger, acquisition, or divestiture
|
·
|
and
the risks inherent in the contemplated Non-Utility Nuclear spin-off, joint
venture, and related transactions. Entergy Corporation cannot
provide any assurances that the spin-off or any of the proposed
transactions related thereto will be completed, nor can it give assurances
as to the terms on which such transactions will be
consummated. The transaction is subject to certain conditions
precedent, including regulatory approvals and the final approval by the
Board.
|
DEFINITIONS
Certain abbreviations or acronyms used
in the text and notes are defined below:
Abbreviation or Acronym
|
Term
|
AEEC
|
Arkansas
Electric Energy Consumers
|
AFUDC
|
Allowance
for Funds Used During Construction
|
ALJ
|
Administrative
Law Judge
|
ANO
1 and 2
|
Units
1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One Steam Electric Generating Station
(nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
|
APSC
|
Arkansas
Public Service Commission
|
ASC
|
FASB
Accounting Standards Codification
|
ASU
|
FASB
Accounting Standards Update
|
Board
|
Board
of Directors of Entergy Corporation
|
capacity
factor
|
Actual
plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the
period
|
City
Council or Council
|
Council
of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
|
Entergy
Corporation
|
Entergy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation
|
Entergy
Gulf States, Inc.
|
Predecessor
company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a company created in connection with the
jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor
company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting
purposes. The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana
jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context
requires.
|
Entergy-Koch
|
Entergy-Koch,
LP, a joint venture equally owned by subsidiaries of Entergy and Koch
Industries, Inc.
|
Entergy
Texas
|
Entergy
Texas, Inc., a company created in connection with the jurisdictional
separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. The term is also used
to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States,
Inc., as the context requires.
|
EPA
|
United
States Environmental Protection Agency
|
ERCOT
|
Electric
Reliability Council of Texas
|
FASB
|
Financial
Accounting Standards Board
|
FERC
|
Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
|
firm
liquidated damages
|
Transaction
that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point
(usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset); if a party
fails to deliver or receive energy, the defaulting party must compensate
the other party as specified in the contract
|
Form
10-K
|
Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 filed by
Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries with the
SEC
|
FSP
|
FASB
Staff Position
|
Grand
Gulf
|
Unit
No. 1 of Grand Gulf Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), 90% owned
or leased by System Energy
|
GWh
|
Gigawatt-hour(s),
which equals one million kilowatt-hours
|
Independence
|
Independence
Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by
Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power
|
IRS
|
Internal
Revenue Service
|
ISO
|
Independent
System Operator
|
kW
|
Kilowatt
|
kWh
|
Kilowatt-hour(s)
|
LPSC
|
Louisiana
Public Service Commission
|
MMBtu
|
One
million British Thermal Units
|
1
DEFINITIONS
(Continued)
MPSC
|
Mississippi
Public Service Commission
|
MW
|
Megawatt(s),
which equals one thousand kilowatt(s)
|
MWh
|
Megawatt-hour(s)
|
Net
debt ratio
|
Gross
debt less cash and cash equivalents divided by total capitalization less
cash and cash equivalents
|
Net
MW in operation
|
Installed
capacity owned or operated
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
Entergy's
business segment that owns and operates six nuclear power plants and sells
electric power produced by those plants to wholesale
customers
|
NRC
|
Nuclear
Regulatory Commission
|
NYPA
|
New
York Power Authority
|
PPA
|
Purchased
power agreement
|
production
cost
|
Cost
in $/MMBtu associated with delivering gas, excluding the cost of the
gas
|
PUCT
|
Public
Utility Commission of Texas
|
PUHCA
1935
|
Public
Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended
|
PUHCA
2005
|
Public
Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, which repealed PUHCA 1935, among
other things
|
Registrant
Subsidiaries
|
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana,
LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas,
Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
|
River
Bend
|
River
Bend Steam Electric Generating Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana
|
SEC
|
Securities
and Exchange Commission
|
SFAS
|
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards as promulgated by the
FASB
|
System
Agreement
|
Agreement,
effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating
companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power
resources
|
System
Energy
|
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
|
TIEC
|
Texas
Industrial Energy Consumers
|
TWh
|
Terawatt-hour(s),
which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
|
unit-contingent
|
Transaction
under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the
asset is not operating the seller is generally not liable to the buyer for
any damages
|
Unit
Power Sales Agreement
|
Agreement,
dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and
System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System
Energy's share of Grand Gulf
|
Utility
|
Entergy's
business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells
electric power, with a small amount of natural gas
distribution
|
Utility
operating companies
|
Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy
Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
|
Waterford
3
|
Unit
No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Generating Station, 100%
owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
|
weather-adjusted
usage
|
Electric
usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal
weather
|
2
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Entergy operates primarily through two
business segments: Utility and Non-Utility Nuclear.
·
|
Utility generates,
transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in service territories in
four states that include portions of Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and
Louisiana, including the City of New Orleans; and operates a small natural
gas distribution business.
|
·
|
Non-Utility Nuclear owns
and operates six nuclear power plants located in the northern United
States and sells the electric power produced by those plants primarily to
wholesale customers. This business also provides services to
other nuclear power plant owners.
|
In
addition to its two primary, reportable, operating segments, Entergy also
operates the non-nuclear wholesale assets business. The non-nuclear
wholesale assets business sells to wholesale customers the electric power
produced by power plants that it owns while it focuses on improving performance
and exploring sales or restructuring opportunities for its power
plants. Such opportunities are evaluated consistent with Entergy's
market-based point-of-view.
Plan to Pursue Separation of
Non-Utility Nuclear
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the Board-approved plan to pursue a separation of the Non-Utility Nuclear
business from Entergy through a tax-free spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear
business to Entergy shareholders. Following are updates to that
discussion.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., the
current NRC-licensed operator of the Non-Utility Nuclear plants, filed an
application in July 2007 with the NRC seeking indirect transfer of control of
the operating licenses for the six Non-Utility Nuclear power plants, and
supplemented that application in December 2007 to incorporate the planned
business separation. The NRC approved Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc.'s application on July 28, 2008, with the approval effective for a period of
one year. In May 2009, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. filed a
request for extension of the approval for six months, through January 28, 2010,
and the NRC approved the extension on July 24, 2009.
Pursuant to Federal Power Act section
203, in February 2008 an application was filed with the FERC requesting approval
for the indirect disposition and transfer of control of jurisdictional
facilities of a public utility. The FERC issued an order in June 2008
authorizing the requested indirect disposition and transfer of
control. In August 2009 an amended application was filed with
the FERC to reflect the transfer to the exchange trust by Entergy of the 19.9
percent of Enexus' common stock shares. In September 2009 the FERC
approved the amended application.
As discussed more fully in the Form
10-K, on January 28, 2008, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy
Nuclear Operations, Inc. requested approval from the Vermont Public Service
Board (VPSB) for the indirect transfer of control, consent to pledge assets,
issue guarantees and assign material contracts, amendment to certificate of
public good, and replacement of guaranty and substitution of a credit support
agreement for Vermont Yankee. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
supplied supplemental data to the VPSB outlining the enhanced transaction
structure detailed in the amended petition filed in New York (discussed
below). On October 8, 2009, a memorandum of understanding was filed
with the VPSB outlining an agreement reached with the Vermont Department of
Public Service, which, if approved by the VPSB, would result in approval of the
spin-off transaction in Vermont. A decision on the memorandum of
understanding as submitted is pending before the VPSB. Entergy
Nuclear Vermont Yankee requested that the VPSB expedite its final consideration
and issue its decision and a final order approving the transactions by
mid-November 2009.
3
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
On July 13, 2009, Entergy Corporation,
Entergy Nuclear FitzPatrick, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Entergy
Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., and Enexus filed
a motion with the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC) in connection with
the planned separation requesting procedures and a schedule to enable the report
of the presiding ALJs to be issued in time for the NYPSC to issue a final order
no later than its regularly scheduled meeting in November 2009 so that the
proposed reorganization can be completed by the end of 2009. In
December 2008, notice had been provided to the NYPSC that the parties intended
to conduct settlement discussions. The discussions did not produce an
agreement and have ended. Nevertheless, Entergy endeavored to address
and resolve the concerns of the trial staff of the NYPSC related to the
financial strength of Enexus and has developed further enhancements to the
reorganization proposal that it believes should resolve these
concerns. Accordingly, in its July 2009 motion Entergy proposed to
file an amended petition reflecting these enhancements for the NYPSC's
consideration. In addition, in its motion Entergy sought to ensure
that the scope of review by the NYPSC would remain confined to the three issues
(i.e., operating capability, financial capability, and decommissioning funding)
previously set forth by the NYPSC and further defined by the ALJs.
Five parties replied to the motion,
generally in opposition to it. The ALJs issued a ruling on the motion
on July 29, 2009. The ALJs declined to adopt a specific schedule and
process, pending receipt of the amended petition and a reasonable opportunity
for other interested parties to respond shortly thereafter. The ALJs
stated that they were inclined to adopt a process with procedural milestones
that mirror those previously employed in the proceeding, including but not
limited to a reasonable opportunity for some follow-up discovery. The
ALJs stated that they remain open to the possibility that evidentiary hearings
might be held as a matter of discretion; however, nothing presented in the
responses to the motion persuaded them that evidentiary hearings are inherently
necessary. The ALJs declined to rule until after the amended petition is filed
on whether the list of issues in their previous ruling should be expanded or
modified.
On August 11, 2009, Enexus filed with
the NYPSC an amended petition for an order approving the reorganization and
associated debt financings. The amended petition describes proposed
enhancements to the corporate reorganization. These proposed
enhancements include a commitment to reserve at least $350 million of liquidity,
a $1.0 billion reduction in long-term bonds to $3.5 billion, and an increase in
the initial cash balance left at Enexus to $750 million from the original $250
million. The amended petition requested that the NYPSC: issue an
order approving the corporate reorganization and associated financings; confirm
the corporate reorganization will have no impact on the Enexus companies' status
as lightly regulated entities; and issue a negative declaration and undertake no
further review under the New York State Environmental Quality Review
Act. On August 11, 2009, Enexus also served updated discovery
responses on the other parties in this proceeding.
Once the spin-off transaction is
complete, Entergy Corporation's shareholders will own all Entergy common stock
and will receive a distribution of 80.1 percent of the Enexus common
shares. Entergy will transfer the remaining Enexus common shares to a
trust. While held by the trust, the Enexus common shares will be
voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the other Enexus common shares on
any matter submitted to a vote of the Enexus shareholders. Within a
period of up to 18 months after the spin-off, Entergy is expected to exchange
the Enexus common shares retained in the trust for Entergy common
shares. Enexus common shares not ultimately exchanged, if any, will
be distributed to Entergy shareholders.
On August 21, 2009, the ALJs issued a
Ruling Concerning Scope, Process, and Schedule that determined that additional
record development was warranted in light of the changes contained in the
amended petition. The August 21, 2009 ruling limited the issues
requiring further record development to environmental significance under the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act and whether Enexus will be at least
as capable as Entergy in meeting all financial and other obligations related to
the ownership and operation of the New York nuclear facilities. To
facilitate further development of the record, the ruling further established an
interim schedule that provided for: (1) the prompt scheduling of a conference;
(2) a discovery period to be completed by September 30, 2009; and (3) separate
rounds of comments on State Environmental Quality Review Act and substantive
issues to be completed by November 12, 2009. The ALJs invited comment
on the ruling on or before August 28, 2009. On September 4, 2009, the
ALJs issued a further ruling revising the
4
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
schedule
adopted on an interim basis on August 21, 2009 to provide for simultaneous
briefing of State Environmental Quality Review Act and substantive
issues. The September 4, 2009 ruling left until after the technical
conference further possible revisions to the procedural schedule. On
September 11, 2009, a technical conference was held at the offices of the
NYPSC. Following the technical conference, the ALJs indicated that
further discovery with respect to the changes reflected in the amended petition
was warranted. On September 16, 2009, the ALJs issued a Further
Ruling Concerning Scope, Process, and Schedule that established: (1) a discovery
period to be completed by October 15, 2009; and (2) a comment period requiring
open issues to be fully briefed by November 12, 2009. In early
November 2009 the New York State Attorney General's Office, the New York
Department of Public Service's Staff, and Westchester County filed initial
comments on the amended petition stating their opposition to Enexus' request in
the amended petition.
On October 1, 2009, Enexus executed
Amendment No. 1 to its credit agreement dated December 23, 2008, increasing the
total credit facility amount to $1.2 billion from $1.175
billion. Enexus is not permitted to draw down the facility until
certain customary and transactional conditions related to the spin-off are met
on or prior to July 1, 2010.
Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to portions
of Entergy's service territories in Louisiana and Texas, and to a lesser extent
in Arkansas and Mississippi, in September 2008. In April 2009 a law
was enacted in Texas that authorizes recovery of these types of costs by
securitization. Entergy Texas filed its storm cost recovery case with
the PUCT in April 2009 seeking a determination that $577.5 million of Hurricane
Ike and Hurricane Gustav restoration costs are recoverable, including estimated
costs for work to be completed. On August 5, 2009, Entergy Texas
submitted to the ALJ an unopposed settlement agreement to resolve all issues in
the storm cost recovery case. Under the terms of the agreement $566.4
million, plus carrying costs, are eligible for recovery. Insurance
proceeds will be credited as an offset to the securitized amount. The
PUCT approved the settlement in August 2009, and in September 2009 the PUCT
approved recovery of the costs, plus carrying costs, by
securitization.
In the third quarter 2009, Entergy
settled with its insurer on its Hurricane Ike claim and Entergy Texas received
$75.5 million in proceeds (Entergy received a total of $76.5
million).
In November 2009, Entergy Texas
Restoration Funding, LLC (Entergy Texas Restoration Funding), a company
wholly-owned and consolidated by Entergy Texas, issued $545.9 million of senior
secured transition bonds (securitization bonds). With the proceeds,
Entergy Texas Restoration Funding purchased from Entergy Texas the transition
property, which is the right to recover from customers through a transition
charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization
bonds. Entergy Texas expects to use the proceeds to reduce
debt. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional
information regarding the securitization bonds.
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their storm cost recovery case
with the LPSC in May 2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a
determination that $152.6 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $90
million. Entergy Louisiana seeks a determination that $267.4 million
of storm restoration costs are recoverable and seeks to replenish its storm
reserve in the amount of $200 million. The storm restoration costs
are net of costs that have already been paid from previously funded storm
reserves. In September 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and
Entergy Louisiana made a supplemental filing to, among other things, recommend
recovery of the costs and replenishment of the storm reserves by Louisiana Act
55 (passed in 2007) financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and
Entergy Louisiana recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane
Rita primarily by Act 55 financing. The parties have agreed to a
procedural schedule that includes March 2010 hearing dates for both the
recoverability and the method of recovery proceedings.
Entergy Arkansas January
2009 Ice Storm
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the severe ice storm that caused significant damage to Entergy Arkansas'
transmission and distribution lines, equipment, poles, and other facilities in
January 2009. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a
discussion of Entergy Arkansas' accounting for and recovery of these storm
costs.
5
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Results of
Operations
Third
Quarter 2009 Compared to Third Quarter 2008
Following are income statement
variances for Utility, Non-Utility Nuclear, Parent & Other, and Entergy
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008 showing how much the
line item increased or (decreased) in comparison to the prior
period:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
Parent
&
Other
(1)
|
Entergy
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
3rd
Qtr 2008 Consolidated Net Income
|
$262,144
|
$205,324
|
$7,819
|
$475,287
|
||||
Net
revenue (operating revenue less fuel
expense,
purchased power, and other
regulatory
charges/credits)
|
77,258
|
22,157
|
4,317
|
103,732
|
||||
Other
operation and maintenance expenses
|
37,351
|
26,805
|
(19,569)
|
44,587
|
||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
(13,717)
|
684
|
1,065
|
(11,968)
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
12,984
|
4,201
|
(200)
|
16,985
|
||||
Other
income
|
30,479
|
32,153
|
(25,320)
|
37,312
|
||||
Interest
charges
|
8,081
|
2,533
|
(22,145)
|
(11,531)
|
||||
Other
expenses
|
1,430
|
4,486
|
-
|
5,916
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
24,662
|
20,493
|
67,020
|
112,175
|
||||
3rd
Qtr 2009 Consolidated Net Income
|
$299,090
|
$200,432
|
($39,355)
|
$460,167
|
(1)
|
Parent
& Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment
activity.
|
Refer to "ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
- SELECTED OPERATING
RESULTS" for further information with respect to operating
statistics.
Net
Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter
2008.
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
|
2008
net revenue
|
$1,298
|
|
Volume/weather
|
54
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
10
|
|
Purchased
power capacity
|
10
|
|
Other
|
3
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$1,375
|
6
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The
volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage in the
residential and commercial sectors, including increased usage during the
unbilled sales period. Also contributing to the variance is more
favorable weather compared to the same period in the prior
year. Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike contributed to
decreased electricity
usage in the residential and commercial sectors in the third quarter
2008. Electricity usage by industrial customers decreased, however,
by 6%. The effect of the industrial sales volume decrease is
mitigated, however, by the fixed charge basis of many industrial customers'
rates, which causes average price per KWh sold to increase as the fixed charges
are spread over lower volume.
The retail electric price increase is
primarily due to:
·
|
rate
increases that were implemented at Entergy Texas in January
2009;
|
·
|
an
increase in the formula rate plan rider at Entergy Mississippi in July
2009; and
|
·
|
an
increase in the capacity acquisition rider related to the Ouachita
acquisition at Entergy Arkansas. The net income effect of the
Ouachita cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed
return on equity with the remainder offset by Ouachita plant costs in
other operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses and taxes
other than income taxes.
|
The
retail electric price increase was partially offset by:
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financings; and
|
·
|
a
formula rate plan provision of $16.6 million recorded in the third quarter
2009 for refunds that will be made to customers in accordance with a
settlement approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial
statements for further discussion of the
settlement.
|
The purchased power capacity variance
is primarily due to lower purchased power capacity costs due to Ouachita interim
tolling agreement costs incurred in 2008 prior to the
2008 Ouachita purchase.
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter
2008.
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
|
2008
net revenue
|
$599
|
|
Volume
variance
|
30
|
|
Other
|
(8)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$621
|
As shown
in the table above, net revenue for Non-Utility Nuclear increased by $22
million, or 4%, in the third quarter 2009 compared to the third quarter 2008
primarily due to higher volume resulting from fewer refueling outage days as
well as fewer unplanned outages in 2009. Included in net revenue is
$13 million and $19 million of amortization of the Palisades purchased power
agreement in the third quarter 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is non-cash
revenue and is discussed in Note 15 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K. Following are key performance measures for Non-Utility Nuclear
for the third quarter 2009 and 2008:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Net
MW in operation at September 30
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
||
Average
realized price per MWh
|
$61.70
|
$61.59
|
||
GWh
billed
|
10,876
|
10,316
|
||
Capacity
factor
|
100%
|
95%
|
||
Refueling
Outage Days:
|
||||
FitzPatrick
|
-
|
16
|
7
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Realized
Price per MWh
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
factors that have influenced Non-Utility Nuclear's realized price per
MWh. While Non-Utility Nuclear's annual average realized price per
MWh increased from $39.40 for 2003 to $59.51 for 2008, the recent economic
downturn and negative trends in the energy commodity markets have resulted in
lower natural gas prices and therefore current prevailing market prices for
electricity in the New York and New England power regions are generally below
the prices in Non-Utility Nuclear's existing contracts in those
regions. Therefore, it is uncertain whether Non-Utility Nuclear will
continue to experience increases in its annual realized price per
MWh. As shown in the contracted sale of energy table in "Market
and Credit Risk Sensitive Instruments," Non-Utility Nuclear has sold
forward 86% of its planned energy output for the fourth quarter 2009 for an
average contracted energy price of $59 per MWh and 88% of its planned energy
output for 2010 for an average contracted energy price of $57 per
MWh.
Other Income Statement
Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $420 million for the third quarter 2008 to
$457 million for the third quarter 2009 primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $15 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
|
·
|
an
increase of $10 million in fossil expenses primarily due to higher plant
maintenance costs and plant outages;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $4 million in payroll-related and benefits
costs.
|
Other income increased primarily due
to:
·
|
carrying
charges of $18 million on Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm
restoration costs; and
|
·
|
a
gain of $16 million recorded on the sale of undeveloped real estate by
Entergy Louisiana Properties, LLC.
|
This
increase was partially offset by a decrease of $4 million in taxes collected on
advances for transmission projects.
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $185 million for the third quarter 2008 to $212 million
for the third quarter 2009 primarily due to:
·
|
spending
of $11 million in outside service costs and incremental labor costs
related to the planned spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear
business;
|
·
|
higher
non-payroll costs; and
|
·
|
the
deferral of spending on other operation and maintenance expenses in 2008
resulting from more refueling outage
days.
|
Other income increased primarily due to
increases in interest income and realized earnings from the decommissioning
trust funds, along with an increase in interest income from loans to Entergy
subsidiaries.
Parent
& Other
Other operation and maintenance
expenses decreased for the parent company, Entergy Corporation, primarily due to
a decrease of $17 million in outside services costs related to the planned
spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear business.
8
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Other
income decreased primarily due to an increase in the elimination for
consolidation purposes of interest income from Entergy
subsidiaries.
Interest
charges decreased primarily due to lower interest rates on borrowings under
Entergy Corporation's revolving credit facility.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate for the
third quarter 2009 was 37.9%. The difference in the effective income
tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the third quarter 2009 is
primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences for utility
plant items.
The effective income tax rate for the
third quarter 2008 was 26.1%. The difference in the effective income
tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the third quarter 2008 is
primarily due to:
·
|
a
capital loss recognized for income tax purposes on the liquidation of
Entergy Power Generation, LLC in the third quarter 2008, which resulted in
an income tax benefit of approximately $79.5 million. Entergy
Power Generation, LLC was a holding company in Entergy's non-nuclear
wholesale assets business; and
|
·
|
an
adjustment to state income taxes for Non-Utility Nuclear to reflect the
effect of a change in the methodology of computing Massachusetts state
income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008,
which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $18.8
million.
|
These
factors were partially offset by:
·
|
income
taxes recorded by Entergy Power Generation, LLC, prior to its liquidation,
resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its
investment in Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC during the third
quarter 2008, which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately
$16.1 million; and
|
·
|
book
and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the
Utility operating companies.
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
Following are income statement
variances for Utility, Non-Utility Nuclear, Parent & Other, and Entergy
comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 showing how much the line item increased or (decreased) in
comparison to the prior period:
9
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
Parent
&
Other
(1)
|
Entergy
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
2008
Consolidated Net Income
|
$547,647
|
$570,637
|
($53,321)
|
$1,064,963
|
||||
Net
revenue (operating revenue less fuel
expense,
purchased power, and other
regulatory
charges/credits)
|
61,129
|
(61,509)
|
(7,881)
|
(8,261)
|
||||
Other
operation and maintenance expenses
|
42,355
|
48,158
|
(27,617)
|
62,896
|
||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
(368)
|
8,698
|
1,987
|
10,317
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
31,101
|
11,482
|
(17)
|
42,566
|
||||
Other
income
|
76,863
|
(17,122)
|
(80,922)
|
(21,181)
|
||||
Interest
charges
|
27,804
|
3,373
|
(54,659)
|
(23,482)
|
||||
Other
expenses
|
11,952
|
9,117
|
-
|
21,069
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
6,161
|
(50,346)
|
34,030
|
(10,155)
|
||||
2009
Consolidated Net Income
|
$566,634
|
$461,524
|
($95,848)
|
$932,310
|
(1)
|
Parent
& Other includes eliminations, which are primarily intersegment
activity.
|
Refer to "ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
- SELECTED OPERATING
RESULTS" for further information with respect to operating
statistics.
Net
Revenue
Utility
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
|
2008
net revenue
|
$3,515
|
|
Volume/weather
|
61
|
|
Purchased
power capacity
|
30
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(6)
|
|
Rough
production cost equalization
|
(19)
|
|
Other
|
(5)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$3,576
|
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily during the unbilled sales
period in addition to the effect of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike in
2008. Electricity usage by industrial customers decreased, however,
by 10%. The overall decline of the economy led to lower usage
affecting both the large customer industrial segment as well as small and
mid-sized industrial customers, who are also being affected by overseas
competition. The effect of the industrial sales volume decrease is
mitigated, however, by the fixed charge basis of many industrial customers'
rates, which causes average price per KWh sold to increase as the fixed charges
are spread over lower volume.
10
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The
purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower purchased power
capacity costs due to Ouachita interim tolling agreement costs incurred in
2008 prior to the 2008 Ouachita purchase.
The retail electric price decrease is
primarily due to:
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financings;
|
·
|
a
formula rate plan provision of $16.6 million recorded in the third quarter
2009 for refunds that will be made to customers in accordance with a
settlement approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial
statements for further discussion of the settlement;
and
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plans effective August 2008 at Entergy
Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to remove interim storm cost
recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as well as the storm
damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is offset in other
operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the financial
statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the formula rate
plans.
|
The
retail electric price decrease was partially offset by:
·
|
rate
increases that were implemented at Entergy Texas in January
2009;
|
·
|
an
increase in the Attala power plant costs recovered through the power
management rider by Entergy Mississippi. The net income effect
of this recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on
equity with the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other
operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other
than income taxes;
|
·
|
an
increase in the formula rate plan rider at Entergy Mississippi in July
2009; and
|
·
|
an
increase in the capacity acquisition rider related to the Ouachita
acquisition at Entergy Arkansas. The net income effect of the
Ouachita cost recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed
return on equity with the remainder offset by Ouachita plant costs in
other operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses and taxes
other than income taxes.
|
As discussed further in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the rough production cost equalization variance is due to
an additional $18.6 million allocation of 2007 rough production cost
equalization receipts ordered by the PUCT to Texas retail customers over what
was originally allocated to Entergy Texas prior to the jurisdictional separation
of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas, effective December 2007.
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
|
2008
net revenue
|
$1,778
|
|
Volume
variance
|
(80)
|
|
Palisades
purchased power amortization
|
(18)
|
|
Realized
price changes
|
32
|
|
Other
|
4
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$1,716
|
As shown in the table above, net
revenue for Non-Utility Nuclear decreased by $62 million, or 3%, in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2008 primarily due to lower volume resulting from more refueling outage days,
partially offset by higher pricing in its contracts to sell
power. Included in net revenue is $39 million and $57 million of
amortization of the Palisades purchased power agreement in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is non-cash revenue and is
discussed in Note 15 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K. Following are key performance measures for Non-Utility Nuclear
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
11
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Net
MW in operation at September 30
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
||
Average
realized price per MWh
|
$61.68
|
$60.46
|
||
GWh
billed
|
29,929
|
31,221
|
||
Capacity
factor
|
91%
|
95%
|
||
Refueling
Outage Days:
|
||||
FitzPatrick
|
-
|
16
|
||
Indian Point 2
|
-
|
26
|
||
Indian Point 3
|
36
|
-
|
||
Palisades
|
41
|
-
|
||
Pilgrim
|
31
|
-
|
Other Income Statement
Items
Utility
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $1,319 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to $1,361 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $32 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
|
·
|
an
increase of $9 million in fossil expenses primarily due to higher plant
maintenance costs and plant
outages;
|
·
|
an
increase of $7 million due to the Hurricane Ike and Hurricane Gustav storm
cost recovery settlement agreement, as discussed above under Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike;
and
|
·
|
a
reimbursement of $7 million of costs in 2008 in connection with a
litigation settlement.
|
These
increases were partially offset by a decrease of $18 million in payroll-related
and benefits costs.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other income increased primarily due
to:
·
|
an
increase in distributions of $25 million earned by Entergy Louisiana and
$9 million earned by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana on investments in
preferred membership interests of Entergy Holdings Company. The
distributions on preferred membership interests are eliminated in
consolidation and have no effect on net income because the investment is
in another Entergy subsidiary. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources - Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita – Storm Cost
Financings" in the Form 10-K for discussion of these investments in
preferred membership interests;
|
·
|
carrying
charges of $29 million on Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs as
authorized by Texas legislation in the second quarter
2009;
|
·
|
an
increase of $19 million in allowance for equity funds used during
construction due to more construction work in progress primarily as a
result of Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike;
and
|
·
|
a
gain of $16 million recorded on the sale of undeveloped real estate by
Entergy Louisiana Properties, LLC.
|
This
increase was partially offset by a decrease of $14 million in taxes collected on
advances for transmission projects and a decrease of $10 million resulting from
lower interest earned on the decommissioning trust funds and short-term
investments.
12
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Interest charges increased primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding resulting from debt issuances
by certain of the Utility operating companies in the second half of 2008 and the
first half of 2009.
Non-Utility
Nuclear
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased from $567 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to $615 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 primarily due
to $34 million in outside service costs and incremental labor costs related to
the planned spin-off of the Non-Utility Nuclear business. Also
contributing to the increase are higher nuclear labor and regulatory
costs.
Other income decreased primarily due to
$85 million in charges in 2009 compared to $35 million in charges in 2008
resulting from the recognition of impairments of certain equity securities held
in Non-Utility Nuclear's decommissioning trust funds that are not considered
temporary, partially offset by increases in interest income and realized
earnings from the decommissioning trust funds and interest income from loans to
Entergy subsidiaries.
Parent
& Other
Other income decreased primarily due
to:
·
|
an
increase in the elimination for consolidation purposes of interest income
from Entergy subsidiaries; and
|
·
|
increases
in the elimination for consolidation purposes of distributions earned of
$25 million by Entergy Louisiana and $9 million by Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana on investments in preferred membership interests of
Entergy Holdings Company, as discussed
above.
|
Interest charges decreased primarily
due to lower interest rates on borrowings under Entergy Corporation's revolving
credit facility.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 36.4%. The difference in the
effective income tax rate versus the statutory rate of 35% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to increases related to state income
taxes at the Utility operating companies and book and tax differences for
utility plant items. These increases were partially offset by
reductions related to:
·
|
an
adjustment to state income taxes for Non-Utility Nuclear to reflect the
effect of a change in the methodology of computing Massachusetts state
income taxes as required by that state's taxing
authority;
|
·
|
the
recognition of state loss carryovers that had been subject to a valuation
allowance;
|
·
|
the
recognition of a federal capital loss carryover that had been subject to a
valuation allowance; and
|
·
|
an
additional deferred tax benefit associated with writedowns on nuclear
decommissioning qualified trust
securities.
|
The
effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
33.8%. The difference in the effective income tax rate versus the
statutory rate of 35% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily
due to:
·
|
A
capital loss recognized for income tax purposes on the liquidation of
Entergy Power Generation, LLC in the third quarter 2008, which resulted in
an income tax benefit of approximately $79.5 million. Entergy
Power Generation, LLC was a holding company in Entergy's non-nuclear
wholesale assets business; and
|
·
|
an
adjustment to state income taxes for Non-Utility Nuclear to reflect the
effect of a change in the methodology of computing Massachusetts state
income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008,
which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $18.8
million.
|
13
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
These
factors were partially offset by:
·
|
income
taxes recorded by Entergy Power Generation, LLC, prior to its liquidation,
resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its
investment in Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC during the third
quarter 2008, which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately
$16.1 million; and
|
·
|
book
and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the
Utility operating companies.
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy's
capital structure, capital expenditure plans and other uses of capital, and
sources of capital. Following are updates to that
discussion.
Capital
Structure
Entergy's capitalization is balanced
between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The
decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily due to
the repayment of borrowings under Entergy Corporation's revolving credit
facility in 2009. Also contributing to the decrease is the
unsuccessful remarketing of $500 million of notes associated with Entergy
Corporation's equity units resulting in a decrease in long-term debt and an
increase in common shareholders' equity.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
54.2%
|
55.6%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
2.5%
|
4.1%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
56.7%
|
59.7%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, common
shareholders' equity, and subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking
fund. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents.
Entergy uses the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial
condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and
creditors in evaluating Entergy's financial condition.
As
discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Corporation has in place a $3.5 billion
credit facility that expires in August 2012. Entergy Corporation has
the ability to issue letters of credit against the total borrowing capacity of
the facility. As of September 30, 2009, amounts outstanding under the
credit facility are:
Capacity
|
Borrowings
|
Letters
of
Credit
|
Capacity
Available
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
$3,500
|
$2,384
|
$28
|
$1,088
|
Entergy
Corporation's credit facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio
of 65% or less of its total capitalization. The calculation of this
debt ratio under Entergy Corporation's credit facility and in the indenture
governing the Entergy Corporation senior notes is different than the calculation
of the debt to capital ratio above. Entergy is currently in
compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio,
or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except
Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or
insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility's maturity date may
occur, and there may be an acceleration of amounts due under Entergy
Corporation's senior notes.
14
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
See Note 4 to the financial statements
herein for additional discussion of the Entergy Corporation credit facility and
discussion of the Registrant Subsidiaries' credit facilities.
Capital
Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of Capital
See the table and discussion in the
Form 10-K under "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources - Capital Expenditure Plans and Other Uses of
Capital," that sets forth the amounts of planned construction and other
capital investments by operating segment for 2009 through
2011. Following are updates to the discussion in the Form
10-K.
Entergy is developing its capital plan
for 2010 through 2012 and currently anticipates that the Utility will make $5.9
billion in capital investments during that period, including approximately $2.3
billion for maintenance of existing assets, and that Non-Utility Nuclear will
make $1.1 billion in capital investments during that period, including
approximately $0.3 billion for maintenance of existing assets. The
remaining $3.6 billion of Utility investments is associated with specific
investments such as the utility's portfolio transformation strategy including
the Acadia Unit 2 purchase, replacement of the Waterford 3 steam
generators, environmental compliance spending including the White Bluff project,
an approximate 178 MW uprate project at Grand Gulf, transmission upgrades, and
spending to comply with revised NERC transmission planning rules and NRC
security requirements. The remaining $0.8 billion of Non-Utility
Nuclear investments is associated with specific investments such as dry cask
storage, nuclear license renewal efforts, component replacement across the
fleet, NYPA value sharing, spending in response to the Indian Point Independent
Safety Evaluation and spending to comply with revised NRC security
requirements.
Acadia Unit 2 Purchase
Agreement
In October 2009 Entergy Louisiana
announced that it has signed an agreement to acquire Unit 2 of the Acadia Energy
Center, a 580 MW generating unit located near Eunice, La., from Acadia Power
Partners, LLC, an independent power producer. The Acadia Energy
Center, which entered commercial service in 2002, consists of two combined-cycle
gas-fired generating units, each nominally rated at 580 MW. Entergy
Louisiana proposes to acquire 100 percent of Acadia Unit 2 and a 50 percent
ownership interest in the facility’s common assets. In a
separate transaction entered into earlier this year, Cleco Power is acquiring
Acadia Unit 1 and the other 50 percent interest in the facility’s common
assets. Upon closing the transaction, Cleco Power will serve as
operator for the entire facility. Entergy Louisiana has committed to
sell one third of the output of Unit 2 to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana in
accordance with terms and conditions detailed under the existing Entergy System
Agreement.
Entergy Louisiana's purchase is
contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary approvals, including
full cost recovery, from various federal and state regulatory and permitting
agencies. Closing is expected to occur in late 2010 or early
2011. Entergy Louisiana and Acadia Power Partners also have entered
into a purchased power agreement for 100 percent of the output of Acadia Unit 2
that will commence on May 1, 2010 and is set to expire at the closing of the
acquisition transaction.
Little Gypsy Repowering
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Louisiana's Little Gypsy repowering project. On March 11,
2009, the LPSC voted in favor of a motion directing Entergy Louisiana to
temporarily suspend the repowering project and, based upon an analysis of the
project's economic viability, to make a recommendation regarding whether to
proceed with the project. This action was based upon a number of
factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices, as well as
environmental concerns, the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in
the capital/financial markets. On
April 1, 2009, Entergy Louisiana complied with the LPSC's directive and
recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of
three years or more. Entergy Louisiana estimated that its total costs
for the project, if suspended, including actual spending to date and estimated
contract cancellation costs, would be approximately $300
million. Entergy Louisiana had obtained all major environmental
permits required to begin construction. A longer-term suspension
places these
15
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
permits
at risk and may adversely affect the project's economics and technological
feasibility. On May 22, 2009, the LPSC issued an order declaring that
Entergy Louisiana's decision to place the Little Gypsy project into a
longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and
prudent. In October 2009, Entergy Louisiana made a filing with the
LPSC seeking permission to cancel the project and seeking recovery over a
five-year period of the project costs. The filing estimates that
Entergy Louisiana's total costs for the project, if canceled, will be
approximately $209 million.
Waterford 3 Steam Generator
Replacement Project
In July 2009 the LPSC granted Entergy
Louisiana's motion to dismiss, without prejudice, its application seeking
recovery of cash earnings on construction work in progress (CWIP) for the steam
generator replacement project, acknowledging Entergy Louisiana's right, at any
time, to seek cash earnings on CWIP if Entergy Louisiana believes that
circumstances or projected circumstances are such that a request for cash
earnings on CWIP is merited. The cash earnings on CWIP application
had been consolidated with a similar request for the Little Gypsy repowering
project that was also dismissed in response to the same motion.
White Bluff Coal Plant
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the environmental compliance project that will install scrubbers and low NOx
burners at Entergy Arkansas' White Bluff coal plant. In March 2009,
Entergy Arkansas made a filing with the APSC seeking a declaratory order that
the White Bluff project is in the public interest. In May 2009 the
APSC Staff filed a motion requesting that the APSC require Entergy Arkansas to
file testimony on several issues. In a subsequent order the APSC set
a procedural schedule that includes an evidentiary hearing beginning in March
2010. In addition, in June 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed with the
APSC, under Arkansas Act 310, an interim surcharge to recover the costs incurred
through May 31, 2009, on the White Bluff project. Entergy Arkansas
incurred $1.9 million through May 31, 2009. Under Arkansas Act 310
the surcharge goes into effect immediately upon filing, subject to refund, and
additional surcharge filings are permitted every six months. On July
20, 2009, the APSC staff filed a motion with the APSC requesting that the APSC
enter an order regarding the conduct of this and subsequent Act 310 filings
related to the White Bluff project, including requiring Entergy Arkansas to
provide additional information and justification for costs recovered pursuant to
Act 310. In July 2009 the Arkansas attorney general filed a motion in
the Act 310 proceeding opposing the imposition of the surcharge, and challenging
Entergy Arkansas' cost calculation.
In October 2009, Entergy Arkansas
lowered the estimate of its share of the project costs from $630 million to $465
million.
Pension
Contributions
For an update to the discussion on
pension contributions see "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates - Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits – Costs and
Funding."
Other Uses of
Capital
Following are other significant, or
potentially significant, uses of capital by Entergy, in addition to those
discussed in the Form 10-K, affecting Entergy's expected level of capital
expenditures or other uses of capital resources:
·
|
In
October 2009 the Board granted authority for an additional $750 million
share repurchase program.
|
·
|
As
discussed in the Form 10-K as a potential use of capital, System Energy
plans a 178 MW uprate of the Grand Gulf nuclear plant. The
project is expected to cost $575 million. On May 22, 2009, a
petition and supporting testimony were filed at the MPSC requesting a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for implementation of the
uprate. The City of New Orleans is the only party that has
intervened in the case. A hearing on the petition was held on
October 29, 2009.
|
·
|
The
issues discussed below in Independent
Coordinator of Transmission involving the transmission business
will result in increased capital expenditures by the Utility operating
companies.
|
16
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
·
|
On
June 18, 2009, the NRC issued letters indicating that the NRC staff had
concluded that there were shortfalls in the amount of decommissioning
funding assurance provided for Indian Point 2, Vermont Yankee, Palisades,
Waterford 3, and River Bend. The NRC staff conducted a
telephone conference with Entergy on this issue on June 29, 2009, and
Entergy agreed to submit a plan by August 13, 2009, for addressing the
identified shortfalls. In its August 13, 2009 submittal,
Entergy provided updated analyses to the NRC that indicated that there is
no current shortfall in the amounts of the required decommissioning
funding assurance for Palisades and Indian Point 2, based upon the
balances as of July 31, 2009 and an analysis of the costs that would be
incurred if Entergy elected to use a sixty-year period of safe storage for
decommissioning, as permitted by the NRC's rules. For Vermont
Yankee, Entergy concluded that there is a shortfall of approximately $58
million, which could be satisfied with additional financial assurance in a
current dollar value of approximately $51 million. Entergy also
indicated that it plans to address this shortfall by December 31, 2009 by
providing a financial assurance mechanism that is consistent with the
regulatory requirements and acceptable to the NRC. The NRC
staff has requested that Entergy provide further details regarding the
cash contribution or other financial assurance mechanism that Entergy
would plan to implement in 2009. A subsequent submittal to the
NRC indicates that increases in the decommissioning fund, as of September
30, 2009, have lowered the shortfall to approximately $40 million, or
approximately $35 million on a current dollar basis. This
submittal proposes using a corporate guarantee as financial
assurance. For Waterford 3 and River Bend, Entergy plans to
make the appropriate filings by December 31, 2009 with its retail
regulators to address any funding
shortfalls.
|
Sources
of Capital
The short-term borrowings of the
Registrant Subsidiaries and certain other Entergy subsidiaries are limited to
amounts authorized by the FERC. The current FERC-authorized limits
are effective through October 31, 2011, as established by a FERC order issued
October 14, 2009. See Note 4 to the financial statements for further
discussion of Entergy's short-term borrowing limits.
Cash
Flow Activity
As shown in Entergy's Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$1,920
|
$1,254
|
||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
||||
Operating
activities
|
2,009
|
2,693
|
||
Investing
activities
|
(1,447)
|
(1,943)
|
||
Financing
activities
|
(1,351)
|
551
|
||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
-
|
1
|
||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(789)
|
1,302
|
||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$1,131
|
$2,556
|
Operating
Activities
Entergy's cash flow provided by
operating activities decreased by $684 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Following are cash flows from operating activities by
segment:
17
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
·
|
Utility
provided $1,320 million in cash from operating activities in 2009 compared
to providing $1,885 million in 2008 primarily due to the receipt in
2008 of $954 million from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation
as a result of the Louisiana Act 55 storm cost financings. The
Act 55 storm cost financings are discussed in more detail in Note 2 to the
financial statements. Hurricane Gustav, Hurricane Ike, and
Arkansas ice storm restoration spending also contributed to the decrease,
partially offset by increased collection of fuel costs, a decrease of $189
million in pension contributions, and a decrease of $63 million in income
tax payments.
|
·
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear provided $845 million (excluding the effect of intercompany
transactions) in cash from operating activities in 2009 compared to
providing $970 million in 2008 primarily due to more refueling outage days
in 2009 than in 2008, a decline in net revenue, and spending related to
the planned separation of Non-Utility
Nuclear.
|
·
|
Parent
& Other used approximately $156 million (excluding the effect of
intercompany transactions) in cash from operating activities in 2009
compared to using $162 million in 2008 primarily due to spending related
to the planned separation of Non-Utility
Nuclear.
|
Investing
Activities
Net cash used in investing activities
decreased by $496 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The following
significant investing cash flow activity occurred in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008:
·
|
Construction
expenditures were $113 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 primarily due to
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike restoration spending in
2008.
|
·
|
In
March 2008, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana purchased the Calcasieu
Generating Facility, a 322 MW simple-cycle, gas-fired power plant located
near the city of Sulphur in southwestern Louisiana, for approximately $56
million.
|
·
|
In
September 2008, Entergy Arkansas purchased the Ouachita Plant, a 789 MW
gas-fired plant located 20 miles south of the Arkansas state line near
Sterlington, Louisiana, for approximately $210
million.
|
·
|
Receipt
in 2009 of insurance proceeds from Entergy Texas' Hurricane Ike claim and
in 2008 of insurance proceeds from Entergy New Orleans' Hurricane Katrina
claim.
|
·
|
The
investment in 2008 of a net total of $220 million in Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana's and Entergy Louisiana's storm reserve escrow accounts as a
result of the Act 55 storm cost financings. The Act 55 storm
cost financings are discussed in more detail in Note 2 to the financial
statements.
|
Financing
Activities
Financing activities used cash flow of
$1,351 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
providing cash flow of $551 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The following significant financing cash flow activity occurred
in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
·
|
Entergy
Corporation decreased the net borrowings under its credit facility by $853
million in 2009 compared to increasing the net borrowings under its credit
facility by $957 million in 2008. See Note 4 to the
financial statements for a description of the Entergy Corporation credit
facility.
|
·
|
Entergy
Texas issued $500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds in January 2009
and used a portion of the proceeds to repay $100 million in borrowings
outstanding on its long-term credit facility and $70.8 million in
long-term debt prior to maturity.
|
·
|
Entergy
Texas issued $150 million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds in May
2009.
|
·
|
Entergy
Mississippi issued $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage bonds in
June 2009.
|
·
|
Entergy
Arkansas issued $300 million of 5.4% Series first mortgage bonds in July
2008.
|
·
|
Entergy
Louisiana issued $300 million of 6.5% Series first mortgage bonds in
August 2008.
|
·
|
Entergy
Louisiana repurchased, prior to maturity, $60 million of Auction Rate
governmental bonds in April 2008.
|
·
|
Entergy
New Orleans paid, at maturity, its $30 million 3.875% Series first
mortgage bonds in August 2008.
|
·
|
The
Utility operating companies decreased the borrowings outstanding on their
long-term credit facilities by $100 million in 2009 and increased the
borrowings outstanding on their long-term credit facilities by $400
million in 2008.
|
·
|
Entergy
Corporation paid $237 million of notes payable at their maturities in
2008.
|
·
|
Entergy
Corporation repurchased $613 million of its common stock in 2009 and
repurchased $468 million of its common stock in
2008.
|
18
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Rate, Cost-recovery, and
Other Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS - Rate,
Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation" in the Form 10-K for
discussions of rate regulation and federal regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
State
and Local Rate Regulation and Fuel-Cost Recovery
See the Form 10-K for a chart
summarizing material rate proceedings. See Note 2 to the financial
statements herein for updates to the proceedings discussed in that
chart.
Federal
Regulation
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
federal regulatory proceedings. Following are updates to that
discussion.
System Agreement
Proceedings
Entergy's
Utility Operating Companies' Compliance Filing
On July 6, 2009, the D.C. Circuit
denied the LPSC's appeal of the FERC's order accepting the Utility operating
companies' compliance filing to implement the provisions of the FERC's rough
production cost equalization bandwidth decision.
Rough
Production Cost Equalization Rates
2008
Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2007 Production Costs
The parties reached a partial
settlement agreement of certain of the issues initially raised in this
proceeding. The partial settlement agreement was conditioned on the
FERC accepting the agreement without modification or condition, which the FERC
did on August 24, 2009. A hearing on the remaining issues in the
proceeding was completed in June 2009, and in September 2009 the ALJ issued an
initial decision. The initial decision affirms Entergy's position in
the filing, except for 2 issues that may result in a reallocation of costs among
the Utility operating companies. Entergy, the APSC, the LPSC, and the
MPSC have submitted briefs on exceptions in the proceeding. The
parties have submitted briefs on and opposing exceptions in the proceeding, and
the matter will now be submitted to the FERC for decision.
2009
Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2008 Production Costs
In May 2009, Entergy filed with the
FERC the rates for the third year to implement the FERC's order in the System
Agreement proceeding. The filing shows the following
payments/receipts among the Utility operating companies for 2009, based on
calendar year 2008 production costs, commencing for service in June 2009, are
necessary to achieve rough production cost equalization under the FERC's
orders:
19
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Payments
or
(Receipts)
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
|
Entergy
Arkansas
|
$390
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
($107)
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
($140)
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
($24)
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
$-
|
Entergy
Texas
|
($119)
|
Several
parties intervened in the proceeding at the FERC, including the LPSC and Ameren,
which have also filed protests. On July 27, 2009, the
FERC accepted Entergy's proposed rates for filing, effective June 1,
2009, subject to refund, and set the proceeding for hearing and
settlement procedures. Settlement procedures have been terminated,
and the ALJ scheduled hearings to begin in April 2010, with an initial decision
scheduled for August 2010.
Entergy
Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi Notices of Termination of System Agreement
Participation and Related APSC Investigation
On February 2, 2009, Entergy Arkansas
and Entergy Mississippi filed with the FERC their notices of cancellation to
effectuate the termination of their participation in the Entergy System
Agreement, effective December 18, 2013 and November 7, 2015,
respectively. While the FERC had indicated previously that the
notices should be filed 18 months prior to Entergy Arkansas' termination
(approximately mid-2012), the filing explains that resolving this issue now,
rather than later, is important to ensure that informed long-term resource
planning decisions can be made during the years leading up to Entergy Arkansas'
withdrawal and that all of the Utility operating companies are properly
positioned to continue to operate reliably following Entergy Arkansas' and,
eventually, Entergy Mississippi's, departure from the System
Agreement. Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi requested that
the FERC accept the proposed notices of cancellation without further
proceedings. Various parties intervened or filed protests in the
proceeding, including the APSC, the LPSC, the MPSC, and the City
Council. The APSC and the MPSC support the notices, but the other
parties generally request either dismissal of the filings or that the proceeding
be set for hearing. Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi
responded to the interventions and protests. Entergy Arkansas and
Entergy Mississippi reiterated their request that the FERC accept the proposed
notices of cancellation. If further inquiry by the FERC is necessary,
Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Mississippi proposed that the FERC institute a
paper hearing to resolve the major policy and legal issues and then, if
necessary, set any remaining factual questions for an expedited
hearing.
Interruptible
Load Proceeding
Following the filing of petitioners'
initial briefs, the FERC filed a motion requesting the D.C. Circuit hold the
appeal of the FERC's decisions ordering refunds in the interruptible load
proceeding in abeyance and remand the record to the FERC. The D.C.
Circuit granted the FERC's unopposed motion on June 24, 2009, and directed the
FERC to file status reports at 60-day intervals beginning August 24,
2009. The D.C. Circuit also directed the parties to file motions to
govern future proceedings in the case within 30 days of the completion of the
FERC proceedings.
June 2009
LPSC Complaint Proceeding
In June 2009, the LPSC filed a
complaint requesting that the FERC determine that certain of Entergy Arkansas'
sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violated the provisions of the
System Agreement that allocate the energy generated by Entergy System resources,
(b) imprudently denied the Entergy System and its ultimate consumers the
benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violated the
provision of the System Agreement that prohibits sales to third parties by
individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-first-refusal to other
Utility operating companies. The LPSC's complaint challenges
sales made beginning in 2002 and requests refunds. On July 20, 2009,
the Utility
20
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
operating
companies filed a response to the complaint requesting that the FERC dismiss the
complaint on the merits without hearing because the LPSC has failed to meet its
burden of showing any violation of the System Agreement and failed to produce
any evidence of imprudent action by the Entergy System. In their
response, the Utility operating companies explained that the System Agreement
clearly contemplates that the Utility operating companies may make sales to
third parties for their own account, subject to the requirement that those sales
be included in the load (or load shape) for the applicable Utility operating
company. The response further explains that the FERC already has
determined that Entergy Arkansas' short-term wholesale sales did not trigger the
"right-of-first-refusal" provision of the System Agreement. While the
D.C. Circuit recently determined that the "right-of-first-refusal" issue was not
properly before the FERC at the time of its earlier decision on the issue, the
LPSC has raised no additional claims or facts that would warrant the FERC
reaching a different conclusion. The matter is pending before the
FERC.
Entergy
Arkansas Notice of Termination of System Agreement Participation and Related
APSC Investigation
As discussed in the Form 10-K, in
December 2005, Entergy Arkansas submitted its notice that it will terminate its
participation in the current System Agreement effective ninety-six (96) months
from the date of the notice or such earlier date as authorized by the FERC, and
Entergy Arkansas' president, Hugh McDonald, has filed testimony with the APSC
each month beginning in March 2008 detailing progress toward development of
successor arrangements. In his September 2009 testimony Mr. McDonald
reported to the APSC the results of a related study. According to the
study total estimated cost to establish the systems and staff the organizations
to perform the necessary functions for a stand-alone Entergy Arkansas operation
are estimated at approximately $23 million, including $18 million to establish
generation-related functions and $5 million to modify the transmission
system. Incremental costs for ongoing staffing and systems costs are
estimated at approximately $8 million. Cost and implementation
schedule estimates will continue to be re-evaluated and refined as additional,
more detailed analysis is completed. Entergy Arkansas expects it
would take approximately two years to implement stand-alone operations for
Entergy Arkansas.
Independent Coordinator of
Transmission
In the FERC's April 2006 order that
approved Entergy's Independent Coordinator of Transmission (ICT) proposal, the
FERC stated that the Weekly Procurement Process (WPP) must be operational within
approximately 14 months of the FERC order, or June 24, 2007, or the FERC may
reevaluate all approvals to proceed with the ICT. The Utility operating
companies filed status reports with the FERC notifying the FERC that, due to
unexpected issues with the development of the WPP software and testing, the WPP
was still not operational. The Utility operating companies also filed
various tariff revisions with the FERC in 2007 and 2008 to address issues
identified during the testing of the WPP and changes to the effective date of
the WPP. On October 10, 2008, the FERC issued an order accepting a
tariff amendment establishing that the WPP shall take effect at a date to be
determined, after completion of successful simulation trials and the ICT's
endorsement of the WPP's implementation. On January 16, 2009, the
Utility operating companies filed a compliance filing with the FERC that
included the ICT's endorsement of the WPP implementation, subject to the FERC's
acceptance of certain additional tariff amendments and the completion of
simulation testing and certain other items. The Utility operating
companies filed the tariff amendments supported by the ICT on the same
day. The amendments proposed to further amend the WPP to (a) limit
supplier offers in the WPP to on-peak periods and (b) eliminate the granting of
certain transmission service through the WPP.
On March 17, 2009, the FERC issued an
order conditionally approving the proposed modification to the WPP to allow the
process to be implemented the week of March 23, 2009. In its order
approving the requested modifications, the FERC imposed additional conditions
related to the ICT arrangement and indicated it was going to evaluate the
success of the ICT arrangement, including the cost and benefits of implementing
the WPP and whether the WPP goes far enough to address the transmission access
issues that the ICT and WPP were intended to address. The FERC, in
conjunction with the APSC, the LPSC, the MPSC, the PUCT, and the City Council,
hosted a conference on June 24, 2009, to discuss the ICT arrangement and
transmission access on the Entergy transmission system.
21
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
During the conference, several issues
were raised by regulators and market participants, including the adequacy of the
Utility operating companies' capital investment in the transmission system, the
Utility operating companies' compliance with the existing North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) reliability planning standards, the
availability of transmission service across the system, and whether the Utility
operating companies could have purchased lower cost power from merchant
generators located on the transmission system rather than running their older
generating facilities. On July 20, 2009, the Utility operating
companies filed comments with the FERC responding to the issues raised during
the conference. The comments explain that: 1) the Utility operating
companies believe that the ICT arrangement has fulfilled its objectives; 2) the
Utility operating companies' transmission planning practices comply with laws
and regulations regarding the planning and operation of the transmission system;
and 3) these planning practices have resulted in a system that meets applicable
reliability standards and is sufficiently robust to allow the Utility operating
companies both to substantially increase the amount of transmission service
available to third parties and to make significant amounts of economic purchases
from the wholesale market for the benefit of the Utility operating companies'
retail customers. The Utility operating
companies
also explain that, as with other transmission systems, there are certain times
during which congestion occurs on the Utility operating companies’ transmission
system that limits the ability of the Utility operating companies as well as
other parties to fully utilize the generating resources that have been granted
transmission service. Additionally, the Utility operating companies commit
in their response to exploring and working on potential reforms or alternatives
for the ICT arrangement that could take effect following the initial
term. The Utility operating companies' comments also recognize that
NERC is in the process of amending certain of its transmission reliability
planning standards and that the amended standards, if approved by the FERC, will
result in more stringent transmission planning criteria being applicable in the
future. The FERC may also make other changes to transmission
reliability standards. These changes to the reliability standards
would result in increased capital expenditures by the Utility operating
companies.
The Entergy Regional State Committee
(ERSC), which is comprised of representatives from all of the Utility operating
companies' retail regulators, has been formed to consider several of these
issues related to Entergy's transmission system. Among other things,
the ERSC plans to conduct a cost/benefits analysis comparing the ICT arrangement
and a proposal under which Entergy would join the Southwest Power Pool Regional
Transmission Organization.
FERC
Audits
The Division of Audits in the Office of
Enforcement and the Division of Compliance in the Office of Reliability of the
FERC jointly commenced an audit of Entergy Services, Inc. on October 1,
2009. The audit will evaluate Entergy Services': (1)
practices related to Bulk Electric System planning and operations; (2)
compliance with the requirements contained within its Open Access Transmission
Tariff; and (3) other obligations and responsibilities as approved by the
FERC. The audit will cover the period from April 1, 2006 to the
present. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 provides the FERC with
authority to impose civil penalties for violations of the Federal Power Act and
FERC regulations.
SERC Reliability Corporation
Reliability Standards
Entergy has notified the SERC
Reliability Corporation (SERC) of potential violations of certain FERC
reliability standards, including certain Critical Infrastructure Protection
standards. Entergy is working with the SERC to provide information
concerning these potential violations. The Energy Policy Act of 2005
provides authority to impose civil penalties for violations of the Federal Power
Act and FERC regulations.
22
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Market and Credit Risk
Sensitive Instruments
Commodity
Price Risk
Power
Generation
As discussed more fully in the Form
10-K, the sale of electricity from the power generation plants owned by
Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear business, unless otherwise contracted, is subject
to the fluctuation of market power prices. Following is an updated
summary of the amount of the Non-Utility Nuclear business' output that is
currently sold forward under physical or financial contracts (2009 represents
the remaining quarter of the year):
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
|||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||||
Percent
of planned generation sold forward:
|
||||||||||||
Unit-contingent
|
52%
|
53%
|
46%
|
18%
|
12%
|
14%
|
||||||
Unit-contingent with
availability guarantees (1)
|
34%
|
35%
|
17%
|
7%
|
6%
|
3%
|
||||||
Total
|
86%
|
88%
|
63%
|
25%
|
18%
|
17%
|
||||||
Planned
generation (TWh)
|
11
|
40
|
41
|
41
|
40
|
41
|
||||||
Average
contracted price per MWh (2)
|
$59
|
$57
|
$56
|
$54
|
$50
|
$50
|
(1)
|
A
sale of power on a unit-contingent basis coupled with a guarantee of
availability provides for the payment to the power purchaser of contract
damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a
result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power
at or above a specified availability threshold. All of
Entergy's outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits
on Entergy's maximum liability under such guarantees.
|
(2)
|
The
Vermont Yankee acquisition included a 10-year PPA under which the former
owners will buy most of the power produced by the plant, which is through
the expiration in 2012 of the current operating license for the
plant. The PPA includes an adjustment clause under which the
prices specified in the PPA will be adjusted downward monthly, beginning
in November 2005, if twelve month rolling average power market prices drop
below prices specified in the PPA, which has not happened thus
far.
|
Some
of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear
power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide
collateral to secure its obligations under the agreements. The
Entergy subsidiary is required to provide collateral based upon the difference
between the current market and contracted power prices in the regions where
Non-Utility Nuclear sells power. The primary form of collateral to
satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty. Cash and
letters of credit are also acceptable forms of collateral. At September
30, 2009, based on power prices at that time, Entergy had $398 million of
collateral in place to support Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing transactional
activity, consisting primarily of Entergy Corporation guarantees, but also
including $20 million of guarantees that support letters of credit and $2
million of cash collateral. As of September 30, 2009, the credit exposure
associated with Non-Utility Nuclear assurance requirements could increase by an
estimated amount of up to $286 million for each $1 per MMBtu increase in gas
prices in both the short- and long-term markets, but because market prices have
fallen below contract prices, gas prices would have to change by substantially
more than $1 per MMBtu to change significantly the actual amount of collateral
posted. In the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation's credit
rating to below investment grade, based on power prices as of September 30,
2009, Entergy would have been required to provide approximately $85 million of
additional cash or letters of credit under some of the agreements.
As of September 30, 2009, for the
planned energy output under contract for Non-Utility Nuclear through 2014, 99.5%
of the planned energy output is under contract with counterparties with public
investment grade credit ratings and 0.5% is with load-serving entities without
public credit ratings.
In addition to selling the power
produced by its plants, the Non-Utility Nuclear business sells unforced capacity
that is used to meet requirements placed on load-serving
23
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
distribution
companies by the ISO in their area. Following is a summary of the
amount of the Non-Utility Nuclear business' unforced capacity that is currently
sold forward, and the blended amount of the Non-Utility Nuclear business'
planned generation output and unforced capacity that is currently sold forward
(2009 represents the remaining quarter of the year):
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
|||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||||
Percent
of capacity sold forward:
|
||||||||||||
Bundled capacity and energy
contracts
|
27%
|
26%
|
25%
|
18%
|
16%
|
16%
|
||||||
Capacity
contracts
|
50%
|
35%
|
26%
|
10%
|
0%
|
0%
|
||||||
Total
|
77%
|
61%
|
51%
|
28%
|
16%
|
16%
|
||||||
Planned
net MW in operation
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
4,998
|
||||||
Average
capacity contract price per kW per month
|
$2.3
|
$3.3
|
$3.6
|
$3.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
||||||
Blended Capacity and Energy (based on
revenues)
|
||||||||||||
%
of planned generation and capacity sold forward
|
89%
|
86%
|
61%
|
22%
|
15%
|
13%
|
||||||
Average
contract revenue per MWh
|
$61
|
$59
|
$58
|
$56
|
$50
|
$50
|
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy's accounting for nuclear decommissioning
costs, unbilled revenue, impairment of long-lived assets and trust fund
investments, qualified pension and other postretirement benefits, and other
contingencies. The following are updates to that
discussion.
Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs
In the first quarter 2009, Entergy
Arkansas recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities
for ANO 1 and 2 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost
study. The revised estimates resulted in an $8.9 million reduction in
its decommissioning liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the
related regulatory asset.
In the second quarter 2009, System
Energy recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for
Grand Gulf as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The
revised estimate resulted in a $4.2 million reduction in its decommissioning
liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related regulatory
asset.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
Costs and
Funding
The recent decline in stock market
prices will affect Entergy's planned levels of contributions in the future.
Minimum required funding calculations as determined under Pension
Protection Act guidance are performed annually as of January 1 of each year and
are based on measurements of the market-related values of assets and funding
liabilities as measured at that date. An excess of the funding liability
over the market-related value of assets results in a funding shortfall which,
under the Pension Protection Act, must be funded over a seven-year rolling
period. The Pension Protection Act also imposes certain plan
limitations if the funded percentage, which is based on the market-related
values of assets divided by funding liabilities, does not meet certain
thresholds. Entergy's minimum required contributions for the 2009
plan year are generally payable in installments throughout 2009 and 2010 and are
based on the funding calculations as of January 1, 2009. The final date at
which 2009 plan year contributions may be made is September 15, 2010.
On March 31, 2009, the United States
Treasury Department issued guidance that allows plan sponsors to use interest
rates earlier in 2008 to measure the present value of the funding liability at
January 1, 2009. Prior to this change, the rates required to be used
for Entergy were from the month of December 2008 and the sharp decrease in
interest rates during
24
Entergy Corporation
and Subsidiaries
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
December
2008 was expected to generate significant increases in the funding
liability. A higher liability coupled with losses in the fair market
value of pension assets would have increased the funding shortfall at January 1,
2009 and resulted in larger future contributions for the 2009 plan year, payable
in 2009 and 2010 as described above. Entergy's January 1, 2009
funding liability valuation was favorably affected by this guidance and 2009
contributions are not expected to materially increase. However, to
the extent that the higher interest rates experienced in 2008 do not recur in
future periods and the fair market values of pension assets do not significantly
recover, Entergy's January 1, 2010 funded status could be adversely affected and
significantly increase future minimum required pension plan
contributions. In addition to the minimum required contribution
required under the Pension Protection Act to fund a shortfall based on the seven
year rolling amortization, additional contributions could be needed in 2010 to
avoid the plan limitations noted above. The necessity of such
contributions and the actual funded status will be based on a number of factors,
including asset performance through 2009 and the interest rates required to be
used to measure funded status at January 1, 2010, and therefore cannot be
determined at this time.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
In December 2008 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets"
(FSP 132(R)-1) that requires enhanced disclosures about plan assets of defined
benefit pension and other postretirement plans including disclosure of each
major category of plan assets using the fair value hierarchy and concentrations
of risk within plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2009.
In June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS 167,
"Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R". SFAS 167 replaces the
current quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly affect the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to
absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the
entity. SFAS 167 also requires additional disclosures on an interim
and annual basis about an enterprise's involvement in variable interest
entities. The standard will be effective for Entergy in the first
quarter 2010. Entergy does not expect the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a
material effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
In August 2009 the FASB issued ASU No.
2009-05, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Measuring
Liabilities at Fair Value" that amends ASC Topic 820 to clarify guidance on fair
value measurements of liabilities when a quoted price in an active market for an
identical liability is not available. ASU No. 2009-05 will be
effective for Entergy in the fourth quarter 2009. Entergy does not
expect the adoption of ASU No. 2009-05 to have a material effect on its
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In the third quarter 2009, Entergy
adopted the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as required by SFAS
168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles." The ASC is the source of
authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB. Entergy will also
continue to apply the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as an
authoritative source of GAAP. The adoption of the ASC did not have
any effect on the financial statements included herein.
25
(Page left blank intentionally)
26
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 2,195,461 | $ | 3,209,000 | $ | 6,140,823 | $ | 7,779,450 | ||||||||
Natural
gas
|
24,030 | 41,981 | 126,914 | 185,361 | ||||||||||||
Competitive
businesses
|
717,604 | 712,903 | 1,979,259 | 2,128,077 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,937,095 | 3,963,884 | 8,246,996 | 10,092,888 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
559,129 | 1,270,160 | 1,927,692 | 2,537,498 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
388,308 | 764,122 | 1,034,483 | 2,132,967 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
61,441 | 58,079 | 178,454 | 165,177 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
681,576 | 636,989 | 2,021,462 | 1,958,566 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
50,069 | 47,515 | 148,119 | 140,327 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
128,851 | 140,819 | 385,649 | 375,332 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
280,641 | 263,656 | 799,183 | 756,617 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(13,224 | ) | 30,452 | (29,371 | ) | 99,970 | ||||||||||
TOTAL
|
2,136,791 | 3,211,792 | 6,465,671 | 8,166,454 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
800,304 | 752,092 | 1,781,325 | 1,926,434 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
14,770 | 10,411 | 47,499 | 28,782 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
64,730 | 37,533 | 170,007 | 143,273 | ||||||||||||
Other
than temporary impairment losses
|
(457 | ) | (7,133 | ) | (85,396 | ) | (35,193 | ) | ||||||||
Equity
in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated equity affiliates
|
1,316 | 1,459 | (442 | ) | (2,042 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
4,423 | 5,200 | (20,468 | ) | (2,439 | ) | ||||||||||
TOTAL
|
84,782 | 47,470 | 111,200 | 132,381 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
130,132 | 128,746 | 383,255 | 371,793 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
22,625 | 33,229 | 69,406 | 93,795 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(8,252 | ) | (5,939 | ) | (26,547 | ) | (15,992 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
144,505 | 156,036 | 426,114 | 449,596 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
740,581 | 643,526 | 1,466,411 | 1,609,219 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
280,414 | 168,239 | 534,101 | 544,256 | ||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
NET INCOME
|
460,167 | 475,287 | 932,310 | 1,064,963 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
4,998 | 4,998 | 14,993 | 14,971 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION
|
$ | 455,169 | $ | 470,289 | $ | 917,317 | $ | 1,049,992 | ||||||||
Earnings
per average common share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 2.35 | $ | 2.47 | $ | 4.73 | $ | 5.48 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 2.32 | $ | 2.41 | $ | 4.66 | $ | 5.33 | ||||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 2.25 | $ | 2.25 | ||||||||
Basic
average number of common shares outstanding
|
193,424,904 | 190,379,009 | 194,044,214 | 191,444,611 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
195,875,241 | 194,960,830 | 197,382,562 | 197,064,629 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
27
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
net income
|
$ | 932,310 | $ | 1,064,963 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow
|
||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Reserve
for regulatory adjustments
|
(1,080 | ) | (1,861 | ) | ||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(29,371 | ) | 99,970 | |||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
947,301 | 896,945 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
512,795 | 561,704 | ||||||
Equity
in losses of unconsolidated equity affiliates - net of
dividends
|
442 | 2,042 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
14,856 | (265,349 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
9,830 | (19,881 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(189,586 | ) | 126,665 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
46,931 | - | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
(12,176 | ) | (8,152 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel
|
196,111 | (395,618 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(117,671 | ) | (88,417 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(10,326 | ) | 230,834 | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(332,547 | ) | 941,625 | |||||
Changes
in pensions and other postretirement liabilities
|
(52,714 | ) | (221,679 | ) | ||||
Other
|
94,226 | (230,977 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
2,009,331 | 2,692,814 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction/capital
expenditures
|
(1,342,840 | ) | (1,455,657 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
47,499 | 28,782 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(291,721 | ) | (327,606 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
197,706 | 250,447 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of assets and businesses
|
39,054 | 30,725 | ||||||
Payment
for purchase of plant
|
- | (266,823 | ) | |||||
Insurance
proceeds received for property damages
|
32,914 | 130,120 | ||||||
Changes
in transition charge account
|
(8,359 | ) | (2,151 | ) | ||||
NYPA
value sharing payment
|
(72,000 | ) | (72,000 | ) | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in other investments
|
24,305 | (227,976 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
1,733,370 | 1,228,760 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(1,807,589 | ) | (1,259,288 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(1,447,661 | ) | (1,942,667 | ) | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
28
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of:
|
||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
781,497 | 3,433,184 | ||||||
Common
stock and treasury stock
|
17,215 | 35,841 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(1,084,732 | ) | (2,004,118 | ) | ||||
Repurchase
of common stock
|
(613,125 | ) | (468,079 | ) | ||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
(1,847 | ) | - | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(435,178 | ) | (431,032 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(14,993 | ) | (15,028 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(1,351,163 | ) | 550,768 | |||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(218 | ) | 1,245 | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(789,711 | ) | 1,302,160 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,920,491 | 1,253,728 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 1,130,780 | $ | 2,555,888 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 442,345 | $ | 455,791 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 18,915 | $ | 127,953 | ||||
Noncash
financing activities:
|
||||||||
Long-term
debt retired (equity unit notes)
|
$ | (500,000 | ) | $ | - | |||
Common
stock issued in settlement of equity unit purchase
contracts
|
$ | 500,000 | $ | - | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
29
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 62,895 | $ | 115,876 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
1,067,885 | 1,804,615 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
1,130,780 | 1,920,491 | ||||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
20,421 | 12,062 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
648,203 | 734,204 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(29,589 | ) | (25,610 | ) | ||||
Other
|
144,625 | 206,627 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
319,176 | 282,914 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
1,082,415 | 1,198,135 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
58,971 | 167,092 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
- | 7,307 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
206,315 | 216,145 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
816,105 | 776,170 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
226,336 | 221,803 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
167,225 | 394,000 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
258,235 | 247,184 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,966,803 | 5,160,389 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
68,634 | 66,247 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
3,142,309 | 2,832,243 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
224,555 | 231,115 | ||||||
Other
|
115,926 | 107,939 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,551,424 | 3,237,544 | ||||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
35,894,147 | 34,495,406 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
744,432 | 745,504 | ||||||
Natural
gas
|
310,990 | 303,769 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
1,504,699 | 1,712,761 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
496,912 | 465,374 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
612,625 | 636,813 | ||||||
TOTAL
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
39,563,805 | 38,359,627 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
16,597,538 | 15,930,513 | ||||||
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET
|
22,966,267 | 22,429,114 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
625,469 | 581,719 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
3,492,131 | 3,615,104 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
172,202 | 168,122 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
377,172 | 377,172 | ||||||
Other
|
1,018,867 | 1,047,654 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
5,685,841 | 5,789,771 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 36,170,335 | $ | 36,616,818 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
30
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 957,816 | $ | 544,460 | ||||
Notes
payable
|
55,031 | 55,034 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
818,349 | 1,475,745 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
320,632 | 302,303 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
122,141 | 75,210 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
15,597 | - | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
175,134 | 187,310 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
275,609 | 183,539 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
162,893 | 162,393 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
39,367 | 46,288 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
255,859 | 460,315 | ||||||
Other
|
175,766 | 273,297 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,374,194 | 3,765,894 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
7,150,319 | 6,565,770 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
312,688 | 325,570 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
374,177 | 343,093 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
387,351 | 280,643 | ||||||
Decommissioning
and asset retirement cost liabilities
|
2,810,824 | 2,677,495 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
138,316 | 147,452 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
2,132,200 | 2,177,993 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
9,972,091 | 11,174,289 | ||||||
Other
|
725,605 | 880,998 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
24,003,571 | 24,573,303 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Subsidiaries'
preferred stock without sinking fund
|
215,223 | 217,029 | ||||||
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
Shareholders' Equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
254,752,788 shares in 2009 and 248,174,087 shares in 2008
|
2,548 | 2,482 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
5,369,474 | 4,869,303 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
7,871,051 | 7,382,719 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(17,561 | ) | (112,698 | ) | ||||
Less
- treasury stock, at cost (65,853,363 shares in 2009 and
|
||||||||
58,815,518
shares in 2008)
|
4,742,165 | 4,175,214 | ||||||
Total
common shareholders' equity
|
8,483,347 | 7,966,592 | ||||||
Subsidiaries'
preferred stock without sinking fund
|
94,000 | 94,000 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
8,577,347 | 8,060,592 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$ | 36,170,335 | $ | 36,616,818 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
31
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, AND PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 7,562,587 | $ | 7,027,630 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
455,169 | $ | 455,169 | 470,289 | $ | 470,289 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
146,705 | 143,772 | ||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 7,871,051 | $ | 7,354,147 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
$ | 184,816 | $ | (476,586 | ) | |||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(233,130 | ) | (109,034 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains
|
34,091 | 67,838 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,609 | 6,824 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
(10,614 | ) | (510,958 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
||||||||||||||||
arising
during the period (net of tax expense (benefit) of ($36,090) and
$245,497)
|
(59,439 | ) | (59,439 | ) | 439,852 | 439,852 | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax benefit of ($255) and
($1,317))
|
1,456 | 1,456 | (547 | ) | (547 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses) (net of tax expense (benefit) of
$56,880 and ($33,716))
|
51,321 | 51,321 | (38,009 | ) | (38,009 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation (net of tax benefit of ($153) and
($902))
|
(285 | ) | (285 | ) | (1,676 | ) | (1,676 | ) | ||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
125,377 | (36,734 | ) | |||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(231,674 | ) | (109,581 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains
|
85,412 | 29,829 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,324 | 5,148 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (17,561 | ) | $ | (111,338 | ) | ||||||||||
Add:
preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
4,998 | 4,998 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
$ | 453,220 | $ | 874,907 | ||||||||||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 5,375,265 | $ | 4,860,481 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuances related to stock plans
|
(5,791 | ) | 4,487 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
(5,791 | ) | 4,487 | |||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - End of period
|
$ | 5,369,474 | $ | 4,864,968 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
32
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, AND PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 7,382,719 | $ | 6,735,965 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
917,317 | $ | 917,317 | 1,049,992 | $ | 1,049,992 | ||||||||||
Adjustment
related to implementation of new accounting pronouncement
|
6,365 | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
923,682 | 1,049,992 | ||||||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
435,350 | 431,810 | ||||||||||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 7,871,051 | $ | 7,354,147 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
$ | 120,830 | $ | (12,540 | ) | |||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(232,232 | ) | (107,145 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses)
|
(4,402 | ) | 121,611 | |||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,106 | 6,394 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
(112,698 | ) | 8,320 | |||||||||||||
Net
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
||||||||||||||||
arising
during the period (net of tax expense (benefit) of $6,529 and
($14,377))
|
4,547 | 4,547 | (24,194 | ) | (24,194 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense (benefit) of
($883) and $3,008)
|
558 | 558 | (2,436 | ) | (2,436 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains (losses) (net of tax expense (benefit) of
$95,830 and ($68,247))
|
96,179 | 96,179 | (91,782 | ) | (91,782 | ) | ||||||||||
Adjustment
related to implementation of new accounting pronouncement (net of tax
benefit of ($4,921))
|
(6,365 | ) | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation (net of tax expense (benefit) of $117 and
($671))
|
218 | 218 | (1,246 | ) | (1,246 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
derivative instrument fair value changes
|
125,377 | (36,734 | ) | |||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
(231,674 | ) | (109,581 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains
|
85,412 | 29,829 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
3,324 | 5,148 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | (17,561 | ) | $ | (111,338 | ) | ||||||||||
Add:
preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries
|
14,993 | 14,971 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 1,033,812 | $ | 945,305 | ||||||||||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 4,869,303 | $ | 4,850,769 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuances in settlement of equity unit purchase
contracts
|
499,934 | - | ||||||||||||||
Common
stock issuances related to stock plans
|
237 | 14,199 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
500,171 | 14,199 | ||||||||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - End of period
|
$ | 5,369,474 | $ | 4,864,968 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
33
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Utility
Electric Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 967 | $ | 1,295 | $ | (328 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
597 | 867 | (270 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
484 | 897 | (413 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
55 | 74 | (19 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
2,103 | 3,133 | (1,030 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
58 | 91 | (33 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
34 | (15 | ) | 49 | 327 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,195 | $ | 3,209 | $ | (1,014 | ) | (32 | ) | |||||||
Utility
Billed Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
11,213 | 10,671 | 542 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
8,131 | 7,997 | 134 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
9,473 | 10,110 | (637 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
663 | 649 | 14 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
29,480 | 29,427 | 53 | - | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
1,163 | 1,431 | (268 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
30,643 | 30,858 | (215 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
Revenues
|
$ | 684 | $ | 654 | $ | 30 | 5 | |||||||||
Billed
Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
|
10,876 | 10,316 | 560 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Utility
Electric Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 2,365 | $ | 2,833 | $ | (468 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
1,677 | 2,076 | (399 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,524 | 2,241 | (717 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
156 | 186 | (30 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
5,722 | 7,336 | (1,614 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
197 | 277 | (80 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
222 | 166 | 56 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 6,141 | $ | 7,779 | $ | (1,638 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||
Utility
Billed Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
26,206 | 26,055 | 151 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
20,842 | 20,922 | (80 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Industrial
|
26,402 | 29,217 | (2,815 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
1,802 | 1,805 | (3 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Total
retail
|
75,252 | 77,999 | (2,747 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
3,863 | 4,160 | (297 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
79,115 | 82,159 | (3,044 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-Utility
Nuclear:
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating
Revenues
|
$ | 1,885 | $ | 1,945 | $ | (60 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy Sales (GWh)
|
29,929 | 31,221 | (1,292 | ) | (4 | ) |
34
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries
are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before
various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the
ordinary course of business. While management is unable to predict
the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy's
results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition. Entergy
discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K and herein and discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial
statements in the Form 10-K.
Nuclear
Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance
associated with Entergy's nuclear power plants.
Conventional Property
Insurance
See Note 8 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy's non-nuclear property insurance
program.
Employment
Litigation
The Registrant Subsidiaries and other
Entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and
federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and
former employees and third parties not selected for open
positions. These actions include, but are not limited to, allegations
of wrongful employment actions; wage disputes and other claims under the Fair
Labor Standards Act or its state counterparts; claims of race, gender and
disability discrimination; disputes arising under collective bargaining
agreements; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative
proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board; claims of retaliation;
and claims for or regarding benefits under various Entergy Corporation sponsored
plans. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are responding to
these lawsuits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants.
Asbestos
Litigation (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans,
and Entergy Texas)
See Note 8 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation at Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi,
Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas.
Subsequent
Events
Entergy evaluated events of which its
management was aware subsequent to September 30, 2009, through the date that
this quarterly report was issued, November 6, 2009.
35
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
NOTE
2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Regulatory
Assets
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets in the Utility
business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant
Subsidiaries. Following are updates to that discussion.
Fuel
and purchased power cost recovery
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding fuel proceedings involving the
Utility operating companies. Following are updates to that
information.
Entergy
Arkansas
Energy
Cost Recovery Rider
In March 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed
with the APSC its annual energy cost rate for the period April 2009 through
March 2010. The filed energy cost rate decreased from $0.02456/kWh to
$0.01552/kWh. The decrease was caused by the following: 1) all three
of the nuclear power plants from which Entergy Arkansas obtains power, ANO 1 and
2 and Grand Gulf, had refueling outages in 2008, and the previous energy cost
rate had been adjusted to account for the replacement power costs that would be
incurred while these units were down; 2) Entergy Arkansas has a deferred fuel
cost liability from over-recovered fuel costs at December 31, 2008, as compared
to a deferred fuel cost asset from under-recovered fuel costs at December 31,
2007; offset by 3) an increase in the fuel and purchased power prices included
in the calculation.
In August 2009, as provided for by its
energy cost recovery rider, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC an interim
revision to its energy cost rate. The revised energy cost rate is a
decrease from $0.01552/kWh to $0.01206/kWh. The decrease was caused
by a decrease in natural gas and purchased power prices from the levels used in
setting the rate in March 2009. The interim revised energy cost rate
went into effect for the first billing cycle of September 2009. In
its order approving the new rate, the APSC ordered Entergy Arkansas to show
cause why the rate should not be further reduced. In its September
14, 2009 response, Entergy Arkansas explained that it used the same methodology
it had used in previous interim revisions, which is based on estimating what the
rate would be in the next annual update based on the information known at the
time. There has been no further activity in this
proceeding.
Entergy
Mississippi
In August 2009 the MPSC retained an
independent audit firm to audit Entergy Mississippi's fuel adjustment clause
submittals for the period October 2007 through September 2009. The
audit report is due to the MPSC by December 15, 2009.
Entergy
Texas
In January 2008, Entergy Texas made a
compliance filing with the PUCT describing how its 2007 Rough Production Cost
Equalization receipts under the System Agreement were allocated between Entergy
Gulf States, Inc.'s Texas and Louisiana jurisdictions. A hearing was
held at the end of July 2008, and in October 2008 the ALJ issued a proposal for
decision recommending an additional $18.6 million allocation to Texas retail
customers. The PUCT adopted the ALJ's proposal for decision in
December 2008. Because the PUCT allocation to Texas retail customers
is inconsistent with the LPSC allocation to Louisiana retail customers, the
PUCT's decision would result in trapped costs between the Texas and Louisiana
jurisdictions with no mechanism for recovery. The PUCT denied Entergy
Texas' motion for rehearing and Entergy Texas commenced proceedings in both
state and federal district courts seeking to reverse the PUCT's
decision. On May 12, 2009, certain defendants, in their official
capacities as Commissioners of the PUCT, filed a motion to dismiss Entergy
Texas' pending complaint before the U.S. District Court for the Western District
of Texas. The federal proceeding, including a ruling on the motion to
dismiss, has been abated pending further action by the FERC in the proceeding
discussed below.
36
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy Texas also filed with the FERC
a proposed amendment to the System Agreement bandwidth formula to specifically
calculate the payments to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.'s rough production cost equalization receipts for
2007. On May 8, 2009, the FERC issued an order rejecting the proposed
amendment, stating, among other things, that the FERC does not have jurisdiction
over the allocation of an individual utility's receipts/payments among or
between its retail jurisdictions and that this was a matter for the courts to
review in the pending proceedings noted above. Because of the FERC's
order, Entergy Texas recorded the effects of the PUCT's allocation of the
additional $18.6 million to retail customers in the second quarter
2009. On an after-tax basis, the charge to earnings was approximately
$13.0 million (including interest). Entergy requested rehearing of
the FERC's order, and on July 8, 2009, the FERC granted the request for
rehearing for the limited purpose of affording more time for consideration of
Entergy's request.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas filed with
the PUCT a request to refund $46.1 million, including interest, of fuel cost
recovery over-collections through February 2009. Entergy Texas
requested that the proposed refund be made over a four-month period beginning
June 2009. Pursuant to a stipulation among the various parties, in
June 2009 the PUCT issued an order approving a refund of $59.2 million,
including interest, of fuel cost recovery overcollections through March
2009. The refund was made over a three-month period beginning July
2009.
In September 2009, Entergy Texas filed
with the PUCT a request for a good cause exception to implement a power cost
recovery factor to collect approximately $26 million annually associated with a
new purchased power contract with Entergy Arkansas that takes effect January 1,
2010. Entergy Texas proposes that the power cost recovery factor be
approved beginning January 2010 and remain in place until the contract expires
or new rates that include the cost of the contract are set after a general rate
case, whichever is earlier. This matter is pending before the PUCT,
and a procedural schedule has not been set. The ALJ suspended the
effective date of the factor until March 22, 2010.
In October 2009, Entergy Texas filed
with the PUCT a request to refund approximately $71 million, including interest,
of fuel cost recovery over-collections through September
2009. Entergy Texas requested that the proposed refund be made over a
six-month period beginning January 2010. The matter is pending before
the PUCT, and a procedural schedule has not been set.
Storm
Cost Recovery Filings
Entergy Arkansas Storm
Reserve Accounting
The APSC's June 2007 order in Entergy
Arkansas' base rate proceeding, which is discussed in the Form 10-K, eliminated
storm reserve accounting for Entergy Arkansas. In March 2009 a law
was enacted in Arkansas that requires the APSC to permit storm reserve
accounting for utilities that request it. Entergy Arkansas filed its
request with the APSC, and has reinstated storm reserve accounting effective
January 1, 2009.
Entergy Arkansas January
2009 Ice Storm
In January 2009 a severe ice storm
caused significant damage to Entergy Arkansas' transmission and distribution
lines, equipment, poles, and other facilities. The current cost
estimate for the damage caused by the ice storm is in the lower end of the range
of approximately $120 million to $140 million, of which approximately $65
million to $80 million is estimated to be operating and maintenance type costs
and the remainder is estimated to be capital investment. On January
30, 2009, the APSC issued an order inviting and encouraging electric public
utilities to file specific proposals for the recovery of extraordinary storm
restoration expenses associated with the ice storm. On February 16,
2009, Entergy Arkansas filed a request with the APSC for an accounting order
authorizing deferral of the operating and maintenance cost portion of Entergy
Arkansas' ice storm restoration costs pending their recovery. The
APSC issued such an order in March 2009 subject to certain conditions, including
that if Entergy Arkansas seeks to recover the deferred costs, those costs will
be subject to investigation for whether they are incremental, prudent, and
reasonable. Entergy Arkansas is still analyzing its options for the
method of recovery of the ice storm restoration costs. One option is
securitization, and in April 2009 a law was enacted in Arkansas that authorizes
securitization of storm damage restoration costs. Entergy Arkansas'
September 2009 general rate filing requests recovery of the 2009 ice storm costs
over 10 years if it is expected that securitization would not produce lower
costs for customers.
37
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike
Filing
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to portions
of Entergy's service territories in Louisiana in September
2008. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm cost recovery case with the LPSC in May
2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a determination that $152.6
million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and seeks to replenish its
storm reserve in the amount of $90 million. Entergy Louisiana seeks a
determination that $267.4 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $200
million. The storm restoration costs are net of costs that have
already been paid from previously funded storm reserves. In September
2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana made a supplemental
filing to, among other things, recommend recovery of the costs and replenishment
of the storm reserves by Louisiana Act 55 (passed in 2007)
financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing. The parties have agreed to a procedural schedule that
includes March 2010 hearing dates for both the recoverability and the method of
recovery proceedings.
Entergy Texas Hurricane Ike
and Hurricane Gustav Filing
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to portions
of Entergy's service territory in Texas in September 2008. In April
2009 a law was enacted in Texas that authorizes recovery of these types of costs
by securitization. Entergy Texas filed its storm cost recovery case
in April 2009 seeking a determination that $577.5 million of Hurricane Ike and
Hurricane Gustav restoration costs are recoverable, including estimated costs
for work to be completed. On August 5, 2009, Entergy Texas submitted
to the ALJ an unopposed settlement agreement intended to resolve all issues in
the storm cost recovery case. Under the terms of the agreement $566.4
million, plus carrying costs, are eligible for recovery. Insurance
proceeds will be credited as an offset to the securitized amount. Of
the $11.1 million difference between Entergy Texas' request and the amount
agreed to, which is part of the black box agreement and not directly
attributable to any specific individual issues raised, $6.8 million is
operation and maintenance expense for which Entergy Texas recorded a charge in
the second quarter 2009. The remaining $4.3 million was recorded as
utility plant. The PUCT approved the settlement in August 2009, and
in September 2009 the PUCT approved recovery of the costs, plus carrying costs,
by securitization. See Note 4 to the financial statements for a
discussion of the issuance of the securitization bonds.
Retail Rate
Proceedings
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the
Utility operating companies. The following are updates to the Form
10-K.
Filings
with the APSC
Retail
Rates
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the rate filing made by Entergy Arkansas and the proceedings regarding that
filing. On April 23, 2009, the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy
Arkansas' petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision.
38
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
On September 4, 2009, Entergy Arkansas
filed with the APSC for a general change in rates, charges, and
tariffs. Entergy Arkansas requested a $223.2 million base rate
increase that would become effective in July 2010. The filing
reflects an 11.5% return on equity using a projected capital structure, and
proposes a formula rate plan mechanism. Proposed formula rate plan
provisions include a +/- 25 basis point bandwidth, with earnings outside the
bandwidth reset to the 11.5% return on common equity midpoint and rates changing
on a prospective basis depending on whether Entergy Arkansas is over or
under-earning. The proposed formula rate plan also includes a
recovery mechanism for APSC-approved costs for additional capacity purchases or
construction/acquisition of new transmission or generating
facilities. The filing also requests recovery of 2009 ice storm costs
over 10 years if it is expected that securitization will not produce lower costs
for customers. Entergy Arkansas is also seeking an increase in its
annual storm damage accrual from $14.4 million to $22.3 million. The
APSC scheduled hearings in the proceeding beginning in May 2010.
Filings
with the LPSC
(Entergy
Louisiana)
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Louisiana's formula rate plan filings with the LPSC for the 2007 and
2006 test years. The LPSC staff and intervenors issued their reports
on Entergy Louisiana's 2007 test year filing in July 2008 and, with minor
exceptions, primarily raised proposed disallowance issues that were previously
raised with regard to Entergy Louisiana's 2006 test year filing and remained at
issue in that proceeding. The 2006 test year included Entergy
Louisiana's request to recover unrecovered fixed costs associated with the loss
of customers that resulted from Hurricane Katrina. In October 2009
the LPSC approved a settlement that resolves the 2007 and 2006 test year
filings. The settlement provides for a new formula rate plan for the
2008, 2009, and 2010 test years. Entergy Louisiana is permitted,
effective with the November 2009 billing cycle, to reset its rates to achieve a
10.25% return on equity for the 2008 test year. 10.25% is the target
midpoint return on equity for the new formula rate plan, with an earnings
bandwidth of +/- 80 basis points (9.45% - 11.05%). The rate reset, a
$20.5 million increase, was implemented for the November 2009 billing
cycle, and the rate reset will be subject to refund pending review of the 2008
test year filing that was made on October 21, 2009. The settlement
does not allow recovery through the formula rate plan of most of Entergy
Louisiana's costs associated with Entergy's stock option
plan. Pursuant to the settlement Entergy Louisiana will refund to its
customers $12.9 million, which includes interest, in the November 2009 billing
cycle.
(Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana)
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the
2007 test year. In October 2009 the LPSC approved a settlement that
resolves the 2007 test year filing. The settlement provides for a new
formula rate plan for the 2008, 2009, and 2010 test years. Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana is permitted, effective with the November 2009 billing
cycle, to reset its rates to achieve a 10.65% return on equity for the 2008 test
year. 10.6510.65% is the target midpoint return on equity for the new
formula rate plan, with an earnings bandwidth of +/- 75 basis points (9.90% -
11.40%). The rate reset, a $36.7 million increase, was
implemented for the November 2009 billing cycle, and the rate reset will be
subject to refund pending review of the 2008 test year filing that was made
on October 21, 2009. The settlement does not allow recovery
through the formula rate plan of most of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's costs
associated with Entergy's stock option plan. Pursuant to the
settlement Entergy Gulf States Louisiana will refund to its customers $3.7
million, which includes interest, in the November 2009 billing
cycle.
Retail Rates - Gas
(Entergy Gulf States Louisiana)
In
January 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate
stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2008. The filing
showed a revenue deficiency of $529 thousand based on a return on common equity
mid-point of 10.5%. In April 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
implemented a $255 thousand rate increase pursuant to an uncontested settlement
with the LPSC staff.
39
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Filings
with the MPSC
On September 18, 2009, Entergy
Mississippi filed proposed modifications to its formula rate plan
rider. The proposed modifications include: (1) resetting Entergy
Mississippi's return on common equity to the middle of the formula rate plan
bandwidth each year and eliminating the 50/50 sharing in the current plan, (2)
replacing the current rate change limit of two percent of revenues subject to a
$14.5 million revenue adjustment cap with a proposed limit of four percent of
revenues, (3) implementing a projected test year for the annual filing and
subsequent look-back for the prior year, and (4) modifying the performance
measurement process.
In March 2009, Entergy Mississippi made
with the MPSC its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test
year. The filing reported a $27.0 million revenue deficiency and an earned
return on common equity of 7.41%. Entergy Mississippi requested a
$14.5 million increase in annual electric revenues, which is the maximum
increase allowed under the terms of the formula rate plan. The MPSC
issued an order on June 30, 2009, finding that Entergy Mississippi's earned
return was sufficiently below the lower bandwidth limit set by the formula rate
plan to require a $14.5 million increase in annual revenues, effective for bills
rendered on or after June 30, 2009.
In March 2008, Entergy Mississippi made
its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the
MPSC. The filing showed that a $10.1 million increase in annual
electric revenues is warranted. In June 2008, Entergy
Mississippi reached a settlement with the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff
that would result in a $3.8 million rate increase. In January
2009 the MPSC rejected the settlement and left the current rates in
effect. Entergy Mississippi appealed the MPSC's decision to the
Mississippi Supreme Court. After the decision of the MPSC regarding
the formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test year, Entergy Mississippi filed a
motion to dismiss its appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Filings
with the City Council
Retail
Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, on July
31, 2008, Entergy New Orleans filed an electric and gas base rate case with the
City Council. On April 2, 2009, the City Council approved a
comprehensive settlement. The settlement provides for a net $35.3
million reduction in combined fuel and non-fuel electric revenue requirement,
including conversion of the $10.6 million voluntary recovery credit to a
permanent reduction and complete realignment of Grand Gulf cost recovery from
fuel to electric base rates, and a $4.95 million gas rate increase, both
effective June 1, 2009. A new three-year formula rate plan was also
adopted, with terms including an 11.1% electric return on common equity (ROE)
with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth and a 10.75% gas ROE with a +/- 50 basis
point bandwidth. Earnings outside the bandwidth reset to the midpoint
ROE, with rates changing on a prospective basis depending on whether Entergy New
Orleans is over- or under-earning. The formula rate plan also
includes a recovery mechanism for City Council-approved capacity additions, plus
provisions for extraordinary cost changes and force majeure events.
The rate case settlement also included
$3.1 million per year in electric rates to fund the Energy Smart energy
efficiency programs. On September 17, 2009, the City Council approved
the programs filed by Entergy New Orleans. The rate settlement provides an
incentive for Entergy New Orleans to meet or exceed energy savings targets set
by the City Council and provides a mechanism for Entergy New Orleans to recover
lost contribution to fixed costs associated with the energy savings generated
from the energy efficiency programs. The programs are expected to begin in
2010.
Fuel Adjustment Clause
Litigation
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed by a group of ratepayers in
April 1999 against Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
and Entergy Power in state court in Orleans Parish purportedly on behalf of all
Entergy New Orleans ratepayers, which currently remains pending, and the
corresponding complaint filed with the City Council. In February
2004, the City Council approved a resolution that resulted in a refund to
customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during the months of June
through
40
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
September
2004. In May 2005 the Civil District Court for the Parish of
Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution, finding no support for the
plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be higher. In
June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the
Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. On February 25, 2008, the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision affirming in part, and
reversing in part, the Civil District Court's decision. Although the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal did not reverse any of the substantive findings
and conclusions of the City Council or the Civil District Court, the Fourth
Circuit found that the amount of the refund was arbitrary and capricious and
increased the amount of the refund to $34.3 million. In April 2009 the
Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision of the Civil District
Court. On April 17, 2009, the plaintiffs requested rehearing by the
Louisiana Supreme Court. On May 29, 2009, the Louisiana Supreme Court
denied the request for rehearing.
Filings
with the PUCT and Texas Cities (Entergy Texas)
Retail
Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
Texas made a rate filing in September 2007 with the PUCT requesting an annual
rate increase totaling $107.5 million, including a base rate increase of $64.3
million and riders totaling $43.2 million. On December 16, 2008,
Entergy Texas filed a term sheet that reflected a settlement agreement that
included the PUCT Staff and the other active participants in the rate
case. On December 19, 2008, the ALJs approved Entergy Texas' request
to implement interim rates reflecting the agreement. The agreement
includes a $46.7 million base rate increase, among other
provisions. Under the ALJs' interim order, Entergy Texas implemented
interim rates, subject to refund and surcharge, reflecting the rates established
through the settlement. These rates became effective with bills
rendered on and after January 28, 2009, for usage on and after December 19,
2008. In addition, the existing recovery mechanism for incremental
purchased power capacity costs ceased as of January 28, 2009, with purchased
power capacity costs then subsumed within the base rates set in this
proceeding. Certain Texas municipalities exercised their original
jurisdiction and took final action to approve rates consistent with the interim
rates approved by the ALJs. In March 2009, the PUCT approved the
settlement, which made the interim rates final, and this PUCT decision is now
final and non-appealable.
Arkansas Attorney General
and AEEC appeals
As discussed in the Form 10-K, the
Arkansas attorney general and the AEEC appealed a December 2007 APSC order that
addressed Entergy Arkansas' production cost allocation, energy cost recovery,
and capacity costs riders. Pursuant to a motion of the Arkansas
attorney general and the AEEC, in September 2009 the Arkansas Court of Appeals
dismissed the appeal.
Electric Industry
Restructuring in Texas
See Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of electric restructuring activity that
involves Entergy Texas. In June 2009, a law was enacted in Texas that
requires Entergy Texas to cease all activities relating to Entergy Texas'
transition to competition. The law allows Entergy Texas to remain a
part of the SERC Region, although it does not prevent Entergy Texas from joining
the Southwest Power Pool. The law provides that any further
proceedings to certify a power region that Entergy Texas belongs to as a
qualified power region can be initiated by the PUCT, or on motion by another
party, when the conditions supporting such a proceeding exist. Under
the new law, the PUCT may not approve a transition to competition plan for
Entergy Texas until the expiration of four years from the PUCT's certification
of Entergy Texas' power region. In response to the new law, Entergy
Texas in June 2009 gave notice to the PUCT of the withdrawal of its transition
to competition plan, and requested that its transition to competition proceeding
be dismissed. In July 2009 the ALJ dismissed the
proceeding.
The new law also contains provisions
that allow Entergy Texas to be included in a cost recovery mechanism that
permits annual filings for the recovery of reasonable and necessary expenditures
for transmission infrastructure improvement and changes in wholesale
transmission charges. This mechanism was previously available to
other non-ERCOT Texas utility companies, but not to Entergy
Texas.
41
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The new law further amends already
existing law that had required Entergy Texas to propose for PUCT approval a
tariff to allow eligible customers the ability to contract for competitive
generation. The amending language in the new law provides, among
other things, that: 1) the tariff shall not be implemented in a
manner that harms the sustainability or competitiveness of manufacturers who
choose not to participate in the tariff; 2) Entergy Texas shall "purchase
competitive generation service, selected by the customer, and provide the
generation at retail to the customer" and 3) Entergy Texas shall
provide and price transmission service and ancillary services under that tariff
at a rate that is unbundled from its cost of service. The
new law directs that the PUCT may not issue an order on the tariff that is
contrary to an applicable decision, rule, or policy statement of a federal
regulatory agency having jurisdiction. Entergy Texas has thus far not
made a filing with the PUCT in response to the newly adopted law addressing the
tariff. The new law provides that the PUCT shall approve, reject, or
modify the proposed tariff not later than September 1, 2010.
NOTE
3. EQUITY
Common
Stock
Common
Stock Issuances
In
February 2009, Entergy Corporation was unable to remarket successfully $500
million of notes payable associated with its equity units. The note
holders therefore put the notes to Entergy, Entergy retired the notes, and
Entergy issued 6,598,000 shares of common stock to the note
holders.
Earnings
per Share
The following tables present Entergy's
basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated
income statement:
For
the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
$ | 455.2 | 193.4 | $ | 2.35 | $ | 470.3 | 190.4 | $ | 2.47 | ||||||||||||||
Average
dilutive effect of:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options
|
- | 2.5 | (0.03 | ) | - | 3.8 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity units
|
- | - | - | - | 0.8 | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 455.2 | 195.9 | $ | 2.32 | $ | 470.3 | 195.0 | $ | 2.41 | ||||||||||||||
42
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In Millions, Except Per Share Data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
Income
|
Shares
|
$/share
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income attributable to Entergy Corporation
|
$ | 917.3 | 194.0 | $ | 4.73 | $ | 1,050 | 191.4 | $ | 5.48 | ||||||||||||||
Average
dilutive effect of:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options
|
- | 2.2 | (0.06 | ) | - | 4.5 | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity units
|
$ | 3.2 | 1.2 | (0.01 | ) | - | 1.2 | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 920.5 | 197.4 | $ | 4.66 | $ | 1,050 | 197.1 | $ | 5.33 | ||||||||||||||
Entergy's
stock option and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 12 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K.
Treasury
Stock
During the nine months ended September
30, 2009, Entergy Corporation issued 642,155 shares of its previously
repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises and other stock-based
awards. Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Entergy
Corporation purchased 7,680,000 shares of common stock for a total purchase
price of $613.1 million.
Retained
Earnings
On October 30, 2009, Entergy
Corporation's Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.75 per
share, payable on December 1, 2009 to holders of record as of November 12,
2009.
Presentation of
Non-Controlling Interests
In 2007, the FASB issued a new
accounting pronouncement regarding non-controlling interests that requires
generally that ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the reporting company (non-controlling interests) be clearly identified,
labeled, and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but
separate from the controlling shareholders' equity, and that the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the reporting company and to the
non-controlling interests be clearly identified and presented on the face of the
consolidated income statement. This new accounting pronouncement
became effective for Entergy in the first quarter 2009 and applies to preferred
securities issued by Entergy subsidiaries to third parties.
Presentation of Preferred
Stock without Sinking Fund
In connection with the adoption of the
new accounting pronouncement regarding non-controlling interests Entergy
evaluated the accounting standards regarding the classification and measurement
of redeemable securities. These standards require the classification
of securities between liabilities and shareholders' equity if the holders of
those securities have protective rights that allow them to gain control of the
board of directors in certain circumstances. These rights would have
the effect of giving the holders the ability to potentially redeem their
securities, even if the likelihood of occurrence of these circumstances is
considered remote. The Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, and
Entergy New
43
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Orleans
articles of incorporation provide, generally, that the holders of each company's
preferred securities may elect a majority of the respective company's board of
directors if dividends are not paid for a year, until such time as the dividends
in arrears are paid. Therefore, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy
Mississippi, and Entergy New Orleans present their preferred securities
outstanding between liabilities and shareholders' equity. Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, both organized as limited liability
companies, have outstanding preferred securities with similar protective rights
with respect to unpaid dividends, but provide for the election of board members
that would not constitute a majority of the board; and their preferred
securities are therefore classified for all periods presented as a component of
members' equity.
The outstanding preferred securities of
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Asset
Management (whose preferred holders also have protective rights as described in
Note 6 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K) are similarly presented
between liabilities and shareholders' equity in Entergy's consolidated financial
statements and the outstanding preferred securities of Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are presented within total equity in Entergy's
consolidated financial statements. The preferred dividends or
distributions paid by all subsidiaries are reflected for all periods presented
outside of consolidated net income. The accompanying financial
statements do not separately reconcile the beginning and ending balances of
preferred securities because there is not a significant net change in the
balance of the securities between periods.
NOTE
4. LINES OF CREDIT, RELATED SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM
DEBT
Entergy Corporation has in place a
credit facility that expires in August 2012 and has a borrowing capacity of $3.5
billion. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of
credit against the total borrowing capacity of the credit
facility. The facility fee is currently 0.09% of the commitment
amount. Facility fees and interest rates on loans under the credit
facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy
Corporation. The weighted average interest rate for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was 1.542% on the drawn portion of the
facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and
capacity available under the facility as of September 30, 2009.
Capacity
|
Borrowings
|
Letters
of
Credit
|
Capacity
Available
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
$3,500
|
$2,384
|
$28
|
$1,088
|
Entergy
Corporation's facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65%
or less of its total capitalization. Entergy is in compliance with
this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy
Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New
Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency
proceedings, an acceleration of the facility maturity date may
occur.
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy Texas each had
credit facilities available as of September 30, 2009 as follows:
Company |
Expiration Date |
Amount of Facility
|
Interest Rate (a) |
Amount
Drawn
as
of
September
30, 2009
|
||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
April
2010
|
$88
million (b)
|
5.0%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
August
2012
|
$100
million (c)
|
0.72125%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
August
2012
|
$200
million (d)
|
0.65625%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
May
2010
|
$35
million (e)
|
1.99625%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
May
2010
|
$25
million (e)
|
1.99625%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
May
2010
|
$10
million (e)
|
1.99625%
|
-
|
||||
Entergy
Texas
|
August
2012
|
$100
million (f)
|
0.72125%
|
-
|
(a)
|
The
interest rate is the rate as of September 30, 2009 that would be applied
to the outstanding borrowings under the facility.
|
(b)
|
The
credit facility requires Entergy Arkansas to maintain a debt ratio of 65%
or less of its total capitalization and contains an interest rate floor of
5%. Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may
be secured by a security interest in its accounts
receivable.
|
44
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
(c)
|
The
credit facility allows Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to issue letters of
credit against the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of
September 30, 2009, no letters of credit were outstanding. The
credit facility requires Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to maintain a
consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total
capitalization. Pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement,
the amount of debt assumed by Entergy Texas ($699 million as of September
30, 2009 and $770 million as of December 31, 2008) is excluded from debt
and capitalization in calculating the debt ratio.
|
(d)
|
The
credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit
against the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September
30, 2009, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit
facility requires Entergy Louisiana to maintain a consolidated debt ratio
of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
|
(e)
|
Borrowings
under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a
security interest in its accounts receivable. Entergy
Mississippi is required to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or
less of its total capitalization.
|
(f)
|
The
credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against
the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30,
2009, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit
facility requires Entergy Texas to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of
65% or less of its total capitalization. Pursuant to the terms
of the credit agreement securitization bonds are excluded from debt and
capitalization in calculating the debt
ratio.
|
The
facility fees on the credit facilities range from 0.09% to 0.15% of the
commitment amount.
The
short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts
authorized by the FERC. The current FERC-authorized limits are
effective through October 31, 2011 under a FERC order dated October 14, 2009. In
addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies are authorized
under a FERC order to borrow from the Entergy System money pool. The
money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the
Utility subsidiaries' dependence on external short-term
borrowings. Borrowings from the money pool and external borrowings
combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits. The following are
the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding
short-term borrowings as of September 30, 2009 (aggregating both money pool and
external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:
Authorized
|
Borrowings
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
$250
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
$200
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
$250
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
$175
|
-
|
||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
$100
|
-
|
||
Entergy
Texas
|
$200
|
-
|
||
System
Energy
|
$200
|
-
|
Entergy
Texas Note Payable to Entergy Corporation
In December 2008, Entergy Texas
borrowed $160 million from its parent company, Entergy Corporation, under a $300
million revolving credit facility pursuant to an Inter-Company Credit Agreement
between Entergy Corporation and Entergy Texas. The note had a
December 3, 2013 maturity date. Entergy Texas used the proceeds,
together with other available corporate funds, to pay at maturity the portion of
the $350 million Floating Rate series of first mortgage bonds due December 2008
that had been assumed by Entergy Texas, and that bond series is no longer
outstanding. In January 2009, Entergy Texas repaid its $160 million
note payable to Entergy Corporation with the proceeds from the bond issuance
discussed below.
45
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Debt Issuances
(Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana)
In October 2009, Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana issued $300 million of 5.59% Series first mortgage bonds due October
2024. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana will use the proceeds to pay on
or prior to maturity its first mortgage bonds, Floating Rate Series due December
2009, which have an outstanding aggregate principal amount of $219,470,000 (of
which Entergy Texas is obligated to pay approximately $100.5 million in
principal amount), for working capital, and for general corporate
purposes.
(Entergy
Mississippi)
In June 2009, Entergy Mississippi
issued $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage bonds due July
2019. Entergy Mississippi used the proceeds to repay outstanding
borrowings on its credit facilities, to repay short-term borrowings under the
Entergy System money pool, and for other general corporate
purposes.
(Entergy
Texas)
In January 2009, Entergy Texas issued
$500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds due February 2019. Entergy Texas
used a portion of the proceeds to repay its $160 million note payable to Entergy
Corporation, to repay the $100 million outstanding on its credit facility, to
repay short-term borrowings under the Entergy System money pool, and to repay
prior to maturity Entergy Texas' obligations related to the following debt
series pursuant to the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana:
Governmental
Bonds share assumed under debt assumption agreement:
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
||
6.75%
Series due 2012, Calcasieu Parish
|
$22,115
|
|
6.7%
Series due 2013, Point Coupee Parish
|
$7,990
|
|
7.0%
Series due 2015, West Feliciana Parish
|
$22,400
|
|
6.6%
Series due 2028, West Feliciana Parish
|
$18,320
|
Entergy
Texas used the remaining proceeds for other general corporate
purposes.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas issued $150
million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds due June 2039. Entergy Texas
intends to use the proceeds to repay on or prior to maturity Entergy Texas'
obligation related to the $100,509,000 of Floating Rate Series Mortgage Bonds
due December 2009 pursuant to the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and for other general corporate purposes. A portion
of the net proceeds were used to repay borrowings from the Entergy System money
pool and invested in temporary cash investments and the Entergy System money
pool.
Entergy
Texas Securitization Bonds
In
September 2009 the PUCT authorized the issuance of securitization bonds to
recover $566.4 million of Entergy Texas' Hurricane Ike and Hurricane Gustav
restoration costs, plus carrying costs and transaction costs, offset by
insurance proceeds. In November 2009, Entergy Texas Restoration
Funding, LLC (Entergy Texas Restoration Funding), a company wholly-owned and
consolidated by Entergy Texas, issued $545.9 million of senior secured
transition bonds (securitization bonds), as follows:
46
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Amount
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Senior
Secured Transition Bonds:
|
|
Tranche
A-1 (2.12%) due February 2016
|
$182,500
|
Tranche
A-2 (3.65%) due August 2019
|
144,800
|
Tranche
A-3 (4.38%) due November 2023
|
218,600
|
Total
senior secured transition bonds
|
$545,900
|
Although
the principal amount of each tranche is not due until the dates given above,
Entergy Texas Restoration Funding expects to make principal payments on the
bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $12.7 million for 2010, $37.8
million for 2011, $38.6 million for 2012, $39.4 million for 2013, and $40.2
million for 2014. All of the expected principal payments for
2010-2014 are for Tranche A-1.
With the proceeds, Entergy Texas
Restoration Funding purchased from Entergy Texas the transition property, which
is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts
sufficient to service the securitization bonds. Entergy Texas expects
to use the proceeds to reduce debt. The creditors of Entergy Texas do
not have recourse to the assets or revenues of Entergy Texas Restoration
Funding, including the transition property, and the creditors of Entergy Texas
Restoration Funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of Entergy
Texas. Entergy Texas has no payment obligations to Entergy Texas
Restoration Funding except to remit transition charge collections.
Fair
Value
The book value and the fair value of
long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2009 are as follows:
Book
Value
of
Long-Term Debt (a)
|
Fair
Value
of
Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Entergy
|
$10,050,293
|
$10,293,961
|
||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
$1,437,851
|
$1,454,111
|
||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
$1,976,711
|
$2,000,001
|
||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
$1,139,773
|
$1,188,515
|
||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
$845,285
|
$880,741
|
||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
$198,021
|
$203,045
|
||
Entergy
Texas
|
$1,651,498
|
$1,757,379
|
||
System
Energy
|
$478,092
|
$486,386
|
(a)
|
The
values exclude lease obligations of $241 million at Entergy Louisiana and
$267 million at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of $181 million
at Entergy Arkansas, affiliate notes payable of $74 million at Entergy New
Orleans, and the note payable to NYPA of $191 million at Entergy, and
include debt due within one year.
|
(b)
|
The
fair value is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and
by nationally recognized investment banking
firms.
|
47
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
NOTE
5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Entergy grants stock options, which are
described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K. Awards under Entergy's plans generally vest over three
years.
The
following table includes financial information for stock options for the third
quarter and nine months ended September 30 for each of the years
presented:
2009
|
2008
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
|||
Compensation
expense included in Entergy's Net Income for the third
quarter
|
$4.2
|
$4.7
|
|
Tax
benefit recognized in Entergy's Net Income for the third
quarter
|
$1.6
|
$1.8
|
|
Compensation
expense included in Entergy's Net Income for the nine months ended
September 30,
|
$12.7
|
$13.8
|
|
Tax
benefit recognized in Entergy's Net Income for the nine months ended
September 30,
|
$4.9
|
$5.3
|
|
Compensation
cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory as of September
30,
|
$2.4
|
$2.6
|
Entergy granted 1,084,800 stock options
during the first quarter 2009 with a weighted-average fair value of
$12.47. At September 30, 2009, there were 11,547,571 stock options
outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $69.17. The
aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding at September 30, 2009
was $123.5 million.
NOTE
6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Components of Net Pension
Cost
Entergy's
qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of
2009 and 2008, included the following components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$22,412
|
$22,598
|
||
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligation
|
54,543
|
51,647
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(62,305)
|
(57,639)
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
1,249
|
1,266
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
5,600
|
6,708
|
||
Net
pension costs
|
$21,499
|
$24,580
|
48
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy's
qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$67,236
|
$67,794
|
||
Interest
cost on projected benefit obligation
|
163,629
|
154,941
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(186,915)
|
(172,917)
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
3,747
|
3,798
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
16,800
|
20,124
|
||
Net
pension costs
|
$64,497
|
$73,740
|
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized,
for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$3,400
|
$1,748
|
$1,974
|
$995
|
$425
|
$917
|
$880
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||
benefit
obligation
|
11,761
|
5,279
|
6,940
|
3,676
|
1,470
|
3,935
|
2,139
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(12,187)
|
(7,516)
|
(8,197)
|
(4,236)
|
(1,815)
|
(5,185)
|
(2,766)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
212
|
110
|
119
|
85
|
52
|
80
|
9
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
1,764
|
79
|
703
|
324
|
305
|
43
|
109
|
|||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$4,950
|
($300)
|
$1,539
|
$844
|
$437
|
($210)
|
$371
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$3,584
|
$1,841
|
$2,058
|
$1,063
|
$445
|
$968
|
$930
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
benefit obligation |
11,616
|
5,047
|
6,784
|
3,627
|
1,415
|
3,882
|
1,937
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(11,765)
|
(7,165)
|
(8,134)
|
(4,075)
|
(1,839)
|
(5,047)
|
(2,452)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cost
|
223
|
110
|
119
|
90
|
52
|
80
|
9
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
2,303
|
115
|
920
|
485
|
319
|
156
|
90
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$5,961
|
($52)
|
$1,747
|
$1,190
|
$392
|
$39
|
$514
|
49
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$10,200
|
$5,244
|
$5,922
|
$2,985
|
$1,275
|
$2,751
|
$2,640
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||
benefit
obligation
|
35,283
|
15,837
|
20,820
|
11,028
|
4,410
|
11,805
|
6,417
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(36,561)
|
(22,548)
|
(24,591)
|
(12,708)
|
(5,445)
|
(15,555)
|
(8,298)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
636
|
330
|
357
|
255
|
156
|
240
|
27
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
5,292
|
237
|
2,109
|
972
|
915
|
129
|
327
|
|||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$14,850
|
($900)
|
$4,617
|
$2,532
|
$1,311
|
($630)
|
$1,113
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$10,752
|
$5,523
|
$6,174
|
$3,189
|
$1,335
|
$2,904
|
$2,790
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
cost on projected
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
benefit obligation |
34,848
|
15,141
|
20,352
|
10,881
|
4,245
|
11,646
|
5,811
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(35,295)
|
(21,495)
|
(24,402)
|
(12,225)
|
(5,517)
|
(15,141)
|
(7,356)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cost
|
669
|
330
|
357
|
270
|
156
|
240
|
27
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
6,909
|
345
|
2,760
|
1,455
|
957
|
468
|
270
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
pension cost/(income)
|
$17,883
|
($156)
|
$5,241
|
$3,570
|
$1,176
|
$117
|
$1,542
|
Entergy recognized $10.4 million and
$4.3 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the third
quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. In the third quarter 2009,
Entergy recognized a $6.2 million settlement charge related to the payment of
lump sum benefits out of the plan that is included in the non-qualified pension
plan cost above. Entergy recognized $19.3 million and $12.8 million
in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, including the $6.2 million settlement
charge recognized in the third quarter 2009.
50
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized
the following pension cost for their non-qualified pension plans in the third
quarters of 2009 and 2008:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
|||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost
Third
Quarter 2009
|
$99
|
$1,021
|
$14
|
$43
|
$21
|
$186
|
||||||
Settlement
Charge Recognized
in
the Third Quarter 2009
Included
in Cost Above
|
$ -
|
$947
|
$9
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost
Third
Quarter 2008
|
$133
|
$78
|
$7
|
$54
|
$12
|
$227
|
The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized
the following pension cost for their non-qualified pension plans for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
|||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2009
|
$297
|
$1,215
|
$26
|
$129
|
$61
|
$556
|
||||||
Settlement
Charge Recognized
in
the Nine Months Ended
September
30, 2009
Included
in Cost Above
|
$ -
|
$947
|
$9
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
||||||
Non-Qualified
Pension Cost
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2008
|
$399
|
$234
|
$21
|
$162
|
$36
|
$681
|
Components of Net Other
Postretirement Benefit Cost
Entergy's other postretirement benefit
cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008,
included the following components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$11,691
|
$11,800
|
||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
18,816
|
17,824
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(5,871)
|
(7,027)
|
||
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
933
|
957
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(4,024)
|
(4,104)
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
4,743
|
3,890
|
||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$26,288
|
$23,340
|
51
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy's
other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||
Service
cost - benefits earned during the period
|
$35,073
|
$35,400
|
||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
56,448
|
53,472
|
||
Expected
return on assets
|
(17,613)
|
(21,081)
|
||
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
2,799
|
2,871
|
||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(12,072)
|
(12,312)
|
||
Amortization
of loss
|
14,229
|
11,670
|
||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$78,864
|
$70,020
|
The
Registrant Subsidiaries' other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts
capitalized, for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$1,765
|
$1,196
|
$1,147
|
$530
|
$311
|
$619
|
$513
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
3,759
|
2,005
|
2,297
|
1,173
|
967
|
1,490
|
605
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(2,143)
|
-
|
-
|
(757)
|
(684)
|
(1,556)
|
(414)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
205
|
60
|
96
|
88
|
416
|
66
|
2
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(197)
|
(77)
|
117
|
(62)
|
90
|
19
|
(245)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
2,087
|
494
|
553
|
657
|
381
|
799
|
320
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$5,476
|
$3,678
|
$4,210
|
$1,629
|
$1,481
|
$1,437
|
$781
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$1,706
|
$1,251
|
$1,099
|
$514
|
$295
|
$606
|
$513
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
3,443
|
1,917
|
2,187
|
1,141
|
953
|
1,440
|
531
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(2,492)
|
-
|
-
|
(905)
|
(789)
|
(1,885)
|
(511)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
205
|
84
|
96
|
88
|
415
|
66
|
2
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(197)
|
146
|
117
|
(62)
|
90
|
72
|
(283)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
1,440
|
494
|
677
|
534
|
291
|
357
|
177
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$4,105
|
$3,892
|
$4,176
|
$1,310
|
$1,255
|
$656
|
$429
|
52
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The Registrant Subsidiaries' other
postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, included the following
components:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
2009
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$5,295
|
$3,588
|
$3,441
|
$1,590
|
$933
|
$1,857
|
$1,539
|
|||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
11,277
|
6,015
|
6,891
|
3,519
|
2,901
|
4,470
|
1,815
|
|||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(6,429)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,271)
|
(2,052)
|
(4,668)
|
(1,242)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||
obligation
|
615
|
180
|
288
|
264
|
1,248
|
198
|
6
|
|||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||
cost
|
(591)
|
(231)
|
351
|
(186)
|
270
|
57
|
(735)
|
|||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
6,261
|
1,482
|
1,659
|
1,971
|
1,143
|
2,397
|
960
|
|||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$16,428
|
$11,034
|
$12,630
|
$4,887
|
$4,443
|
$4,311
|
$2,343
|
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service
cost - benefits earned
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
during
the period
|
$5,118
|
$3,753
|
$3,297
|
$1,542
|
$885
|
$1,818
|
$1,539
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
cost on APBO
|
10,329
|
5,751
|
6,561
|
3,423
|
2,859
|
4,320
|
1,593
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected
return on assets
|
(7,476)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,715)
|
(2,367)
|
(5,655)
|
(1,533)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of transition
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
obligation
|
615
|
252
|
288
|
264
|
1,245
|
198
|
6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of prior service
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cost
|
(591)
|
438
|
351
|
(186)
|
270
|
216
|
(849)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of loss
|
4,320
|
1,482
|
2,031
|
1,602
|
873
|
1,071
|
531
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
other postretirement benefit cost
|
$12,315
|
$11,676
|
$12,528
|
$3,930
|
$3,765
|
$1,968
|
$1,287
|
Employer
Contributions
As of the end of October 2009, Entergy
contributed $132 million to its pension plans in 2009. Entergy does
not anticipate making additional contributions to its qualified pension plans in
2009. Guidance pursuant to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 rules,
effective for the 2009 plan year and beyond, may affect the level of Entergy's
pension contributions in the future.
53
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
Registrant Subsidiaries contributed the following to qualified pension plans
through October 2009 and do not anticipate additional contributions in
2009:
Entergy
|
||||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
New
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Pension
contributions made
through
October 2009
|
$24,808
|
$6,029
|
$7,623
|
$5,819
|
$1,107
|
$3,577
|
$4,747
|
Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Medicare Act)
Based on actuarial analysis, the
estimated effect of future Medicare subsidies reduced the December 31, 2008
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO) by $187 million, and
reduced the third quarter 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost by
$6.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively. It reduced the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost by
$18.0 million and $18.6 million, respectively. In the third quarter
2009, Entergy received $2.7 million in Medicare subsidies for prescription drug
claims. In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Entergy received
$3.8 million in Medicare subsidies for prescription drug claims.
Based on actuarial analysis, the
estimated effect of future Medicare subsidies reduced the December 31, 2008 APBO
and the third quarters 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost and the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 other postretirement benefit cost
for the Registrant Subsidiaries as follows:
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
|||||||||||||
Entergy
|
Gulf
States
|
Entergy
|
Entergy
|
New
|
Entergy
|
System
|
||||||||
Arkansas
|
Louisiana
|
Louisiana
|
Mississippi
|
Orleans
|
Texas
|
Energy
|
||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Reduction
in 12/31/2008 APBO
|
($40,610)
|
($19,650)
|
($22,222)
|
($13,280)
|
($9,135)
|
($14,961)
|
($6,628)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in third quarter 2009
|
||||||||||||||
other
postretirement benefit cost
|
($1,235)
|
($814)
|
($695)
|
($391)
|
($261)
|
($240)
|
($231)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in third quarter 2008
|
||||||||||||||
other
postretirement benefit cost
|
($1,266)
|
($876)
|
($706)
|
($406)
|
($279)
|
($263)
|
($236)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in nine months ended
|
||||||||||||||
September
30, 2009 other
|
||||||||||||||
postretirement
benefit cost
|
($3,705)
|
($2,442)
|
($2,085)
|
($1,173)
|
($783)
|
($720)
|
($693)
|
|||||||
Reduction
in nine months ended
|
||||||||||||||
September
30, 2008 other
|
||||||||||||||
postretirement
benefit cost
|
($3,798)
|
($2,628)
|
($2,118)
|
($1,218)
|
($837)
|
($789)
|
($708)
|
|||||||
Medicare
subsidies received in the
|
||||||||||||||
third
quarter 2009
|
$630
|
$338
|
$396
|
$206
|
$216
|
$320
|
$62
|
|||||||
Medicare
subsidies received in the
|
||||||||||||||
nine
months ended
|
||||||||||||||
September
30, 2009
|
$886
|
$500
|
$564
|
$290
|
$313
|
$425
|
$87
|
For further information on the Medicare
Act refer to Note 11 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.
54
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
NOTE
7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
Entergy
Corporation
Entergy's reportable segments as of
September 30, 2009 are Utility and Non-Utility Nuclear. Utility
generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power in portions of
Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and provides natural gas utility
service in portions of Louisiana. Non-Utility Nuclear owns and
operates six nuclear power plants and is primarily focused on selling electric
power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. "All Other"
includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity,
including the non-nuclear wholesale assets business, and earnings on the
proceeds of sales of previously-owned businesses.
Entergy's
segment financial information for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear*
|
All
Other*
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||
2009
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$2,220,285
|
$684,214
|
$39,568
|
($6,972)
|
$2,937,095
|
||||
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated equity affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,316
|
$-
|
$1,316
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$180,054
|
$114,045
|
($13,685)
|
$-
|
$280,414
|
||||
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
$299,090
|
$200,432
|
($20,996)
|
($18,359)
|
$460,167
|
||||
2008
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$3,251,796
|
$654,432
|
$64,125
|
($6,469)
|
$3,963,884
|
||||
Equity
in earnings of
|
|||||||||
unconsolidated
equity affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,459
|
$-
|
$1,459
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$155,392
|
$93,552
|
($80,705)
|
$-
|
$168,239
|
||||
Consolidated
net income
|
$262,144
|
$205,324
|
$29,238
|
($21,419)
|
$475,287
|
Entergy's segment financial information
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
Utility
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear*
|
All
Other*
|
Eliminations
|
Consolidated
|
|||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||
2009
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$6,270,322
|
$1,885,330
|
$111,899
|
($20,555)
|
$8,246,996
|
||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated
|
|||||||||
equity
affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
($442)
|
$-
|
($442)
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$358,218
|
$252,081
|
($76,198)
|
$-
|
$534,101
|
||||
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
$566,634
|
$461,524
|
($40,770)
|
($55,078)
|
$932,310
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$29,033,139
|
$8,584,590
|
$988,402
|
($2,435,796)
|
$36,170,335
|
||||
2008
|
|||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$7,967,429
|
$1,944,647
|
$201,014
|
($20,202)
|
$10,092,888
|
||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated
|
|||||||||
equity
affiliates
|
$-
|
$-
|
($2,042)
|
$-
|
($2,042)
|
||||
Income
taxes (benefit)
|
$352,057
|
$302,427
|
($110,228)
|
$-
|
$544,256
|
||||
Consolidated
net income (loss)
|
$547,647
|
$570,637
|
($31,902)
|
($21,419)
|
$1,064,963
|
||||
Total
assets
|
$28,200,131
|
$7,672,826
|
$1,881,122
|
($1,296,115)
|
$36,457,964
|
55
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Businesses
marked with * are sometimes referred to as the "competitive businesses," with
the exception of the parent company, Entergy
Corporation. Eliminations are primarily intersegment
activity. Almost all of Entergy's goodwill is related to the Utility
segment.
Registrant
Subsidiaries
The Registrant Subsidiaries have one
reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System
Energy, which is an electricity generation business. The Registrant
Subsidiaries' operations are managed on an integrated basis because of the
substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business
process, cost structures, and operating results.
NOTE
8. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES
Market
and Commodity Risks
In the
normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market and
commodity risks. Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may
incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular
instrument or commodity. All financial and commodity-related
instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market
risk. Entergy is subject to a number of commodity and market risks,
including:
Type
of Risk
|
Affected
Businesses
|
|
Power
price risk
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear, Non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
|
Fuel
price risk
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear, Non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
|
Foreign
currency exchange rate risk
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear, Non-nuclear wholesale assets
|
|
Equity
price and interest rate risk - investments
|
Utility,
Non-Utility Nuclear
|
Entergy
manages a portion of these risks using derivative instruments, some of which are
classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions
while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sales transactions due to
their physical settlement provisions. Normal purchase/normal sale
risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements and fuel
purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling
agreements. Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural
gas and electricity futures, forwards, swaps, and options; foreign currency
forwards; and interest rate swaps. Entergy enters into derivatives
only to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or
liabilities.
Entergy
manages fuel price risk for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans) and Entergy Mississippi
primarily through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps. These
swaps are marked-to-market with offsetting regulatory assets or
liabilities. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a
portion of projected annual exposure to gas for electric generation and
projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
and Entergy New Orleans.
Entergy's
exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the
size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as
market volatility and liquidity. For instruments such as options, the
time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship
between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option's
contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market
risk. A significant factor influencing the overall level of market
risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate
such risk. Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring
compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the
effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies. Entergy's risk
management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net
exposure during the stated periods. These policies, including related
risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given
Entergy's objectives.
56
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Hedging
Derivatives
The fair values of Entergy's derivative
instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 are as
follows:
Instrument
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Business
|
|||
Derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments
|
||||||
Assets:
|
||||||
Electricity
futures, forwards, and swaps
|
Prepayments
and other (current portion)
|
$133
million
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
|||
Electricity
futures, forwards, and swaps
|
Other
deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)
|
$83
million
|
Non-Utility
Nuclear
|
|||
Derivatives
not designated as hedging
instruments
|
||||||
Assets:
|
||||||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Prepayments
and other
|
$6
million
|
Utility
|
The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated statements of
income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:
Instrument
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion)
|
Statement
of Income location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective
portion)
|
|||
Electricity
futures, forwards,
and
swaps
|
$9
million
|
Competitive
businesses operating revenues
|
$106
million
|
|||
The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated statements of
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:
Instrument
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (effective portion)
|
Statement
of Income location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective
portion)
|
|||
Electricity
futures, forwards,
and
swaps
|
$248
million
|
Competitive
businesses operating revenues
|
$239
million
|
|||
57
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Electricity
over-the-counter swaps that financially settle against day-ahead power pool
prices are used to manage price exposure for Non-Utility Nuclear
generation. Based on market prices as of September 30, 2009, cash
flow hedges relating to power sales totaled $216 million of gross gains, of
which approximately $133 million are expected to be reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) to operating revenues in the next
twelve months. The actual amount reclassified from accumulated OCI,
however, could vary due to future changes in market prices. Gains
totaling approximately $106 million and $239 million were realized on the
maturity of cash flow hedges for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. Unrealized gains or losses recorded in OCI result from
hedging power output at the Non-Utility Nuclear power plants. The
related gains or losses from hedging power are included in operating revenues
when realized. The maximum length of time over which Entergy is
currently hedging the variability in future cash flows for forecasted power
transactions at September 30, 2009 is approximately four
years. Planned generation sold forward from Non-Utility Nuclear power
plants as of September 30, 2009 is 86% for the fourth quarter 2009 of which
approximately one-third is sold under financial hedges and the remainder under
normal purchase/sale contracts. The ineffective portion of the change
in the value of Entergy's cash flow hedges during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was insignificant. Certain of the
agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear power
plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide
collateral to secure its obligations when the current market prices exceed the
contracted power prices. The primary form of collateral to
satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty. At
September 30, 2009, hedge contracts with two counterparties were in a liability
position (approximately $7 million total), but both were significantly below the
amounts of guarantees provided under their contracts and no cash collateral was
required. If the Entergy Corporation credit rating falls below
investment grade, the impact of the corporate guarantee is ignored and Entergy
would have to post collateral equal to the estimated outstanding liability under
the contract at the applicable date.
Natural gas over-the-counter swaps that
financially settle against NYMEX futures are used to manage fuel price risk for
the Utility's Louisiana and Mississippi customers. All benefits or
costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The total volume of
natural gas swaps outstanding as of September 30, 2009 is 25,490,000 MMBtu for
Entergy, 6,800,000 MMBtu for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, 11,950,000 MMBtu for
Entergy Louisiana, 4,630,000 MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi, and 2,110,000 MMBtu
for Entergy New Orleans. Credit support for these natural gas swaps
are covered by master agreements that do not require collateralization based on
mark-to-market value but do carry material adverse change clauses that may lead
to collateralization requests. The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements
of income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is as
follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss)
recorded
in income
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($21)
million
|
The effect of Entergy's derivative
instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements
of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as
follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss)
recorded
in income
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($157)
million
|
Due to
regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked to market through fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are
simultaneously reversed and recorded as offsetting regulatory assets or
liabilities. The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the
swaps are settled are recovered through each Registrant's fuel recovery
mechanism.
58
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
values of the Registrant Subsidiaries' derivative instruments on their balance
sheets as of September 30, 2009 are as follows:
Instrument
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
Registrant
|
|||
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments
|
||||||
Assets:
|
||||||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Prepayments
and other
|
$1.4
million
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$3.0
million
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Gas
hedge contracts
|
$1.2
million
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Prepayments
and other
|
$0.6
million
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
|||
The effects of the Registrant
Subsidiaries' derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on
their statements of income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 are as
follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recorded in income
|
Registrant
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($4.1)
million
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($5.8)
million
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($7.5)
million
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($3.5)
million
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
The effects of the Registrant
Subsidiaries' derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on
their statements of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as
follows:
Instrument
|
Statement
of Income Location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recorded in income
|
Registrant
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($41.6)
million
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($62.9)
million
|
Entergy
Louisiana
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($43.2)
million
|
Entergy
Mississippi
|
|||
Natural
gas swaps
|
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale
|
($9.1)
million
|
Entergy
New Orleans
|
Due to
regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked to market through fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are
simultaneously reversed and recorded as offsetting regulatory assets or
liabilities. The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the
swaps are settled are recovered through each Registrant's fuel recovery
mechanism.
59
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Fair
Values
The estimated fair values of Entergy's
financial instruments and derivatives are determined using bid prices and market
quotes. Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates
of fair value. Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of
the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market
exchange. Gains or losses realized on financial instruments held by
regulated businesses may be reflected in future rates and therefore do not
accrue to the benefit or detriment of shareholders. Entergy considers
the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets
and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the
short maturity of these instruments.
Accounting standards define fair value
as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the
amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between knowledgeable market participants at date of
measurement. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions
or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or
liabilities at fair value. The inputs can be readily observable,
corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Entergy and
the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to
determine fair value.
Accounting standards establish a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair
value. The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted
market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the
lowest priority for unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair
value hierarchy are:
·
|
Level
1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions
for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to
provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1
primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents,
debt instruments, and gas hedge
contracts.
|
·
|
Level
2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1
that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or
liability at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs include the
following:
|
-
|
quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets;
|
-
|
quoted
prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive
markets;
|
-
|
inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability;
or
|
-
|
inputs
that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data by correlation or other means.
|
Level 2
consists primarily of individually owned debt instruments or shares in common
trusts.
·
|
Level
3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable
or unobservable from objective sources. These inputs are used
with internally developed methodologies to produce management's best
estimate of fair value for the asset or liability. Level 3
consists primarily of derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges
of power sales at merchant power
plants.
|
The
values for the cash flow hedges that are recorded as derivative contract assets
or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market
prices and unobservable inputs such as model-generated prices for longer-term
markets and are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The
amounts reflected as the fair value of derivative assets or liabilities are
based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance
sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date
(treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable or
payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date. These
derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash
flows for sales of the output from Entergy's Non-Utility Nuclear
business. The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison
between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period
from a combination of quoted forward power market prices for the period for
which such curves are available, and
60
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
model-generated
prices using quoted forward gas market curves and estimates regarding heat rates
to convert gas to power and the costs associated with the transportation of the
power from the plants' bus bar to the contract's point of delivery, generally a
power market hub, for the period thereafter. The difference
between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices
multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the
counterparties' credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative
contract assets or liabilities. $223 million of cash flow hedges at September
30, 2009 are in-the-money contracts with counterparties who are all currently
investment grade. $7 million of the cash flow hedges at September 30,
2009 are out-of-the-money contracts supported by corporate guarantees, which
would require additional cash or letters of credit in the event of a decrease in
Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment
grade.
The
following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy's
assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
as of September 30, 2009. The assessment of the significance of a
particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect
their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$1,068
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,068
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
253
|
1,431
|
-
|
1,684
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
441
|
1,017
|
-
|
1,458
|
||||
Power
contracts
|
-
|
-
|
216
|
216
|
||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
20
|
-
|
-
|
20
|
||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
6
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
||||
Other
investments
|
41
|
-
|
-
|
41
|
||||
$1,829
|
$2,448
|
$216
|
$4,493
|
The
following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the assets
(liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the
fair value hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2009:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Balance
as of beginning of period
|
$313
|
($734)
|
||
Price
changes (unrealized gains/losses)
|
2
|
638
|
||
Originated
|
7
|
6
|
||
Settlements
|
(106)
|
38
|
||
Balance
as of September 30
|
$216
|
($52)
|
61
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The
following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the assets
(liabilities) for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the
fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
Balance
as of January 1
|
$207
|
($12)
|
||
Price
changes (unrealized gains/losses)
|
239
|
(39)
|
||
Originated
|
9
|
(70)
|
||
Settlements
|
(239)
|
69
|
||
Balance
as of September 30
|
$216
|
($52)
|
The
following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the
Registrant Subsidiaries' assets that are accounted for at fair value on a
recurring basis as of September 30, 2009. The assessment of the
significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment
and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy
levels.
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Entergy
Arkansas:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$69.3
|
$-
|
$-
|
$69.3
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
5.8
|
185.0
|
-
|
190.8
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
19.7
|
219.4
|
-
|
239.1
|
||||
$94.8
|
$404.4
|
$-
|
$499.2
|
|||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$131.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
$131.6
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
2.5
|
151.6
|
-
|
154.1
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
24.9
|
162.7
|
-
|
187.6
|
||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
1.4
|
-
|
-
|
1.4
|
||||
$160.4
|
$314.3
|
$-
|
$474.7
|
62
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy
Louisiana:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$90.2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$90.2
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
7.1
|
105.0
|
-
|
112.1
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
44.3
|
46.8
|
-
|
91.1
|
||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
3.0
|
-
|
-
|
3.0
|
||||
Other
investments
|
0.8
|
-
|
-
|
0.8
|
||||
$145.4
|
$151.8
|
$-
|
$297.2
|
|||||
Entergy
Mississippi:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$69.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
$69.6
|
||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
1.2
|
-
|
-
|
1.2
|
||||
Other
investments
|
31.9
|
-
|
-
|
31.9
|
||||
$102.7
|
$-
|
$-
|
$102.7
|
|||||
Entergy
New Orleans:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$150.3
|
$-
|
$-
|
$150.3
|
||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
0.6
|
-
|
-
|
0.6
|
||||
Other
investments
|
8.0
|
-
|
-
|
8.0
|
||||
$158.9
|
$-
|
$-
|
$158.9
|
|||||
Entergy
Texas:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$135.2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$135.2
|
||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
20.4
|
-
|
-
|
20.4
|
||||
$155.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
$155.6
|
|||||
System
Energy:
|
||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
$149.6
|
$-
|
$-
|
$149.6
|
||||
Decommissioning
trust funds:
|
||||||||
Equity
securities
|
2.5
|
171.1
|
-
|
173.6
|
||||
Debt
securities
|
72.9
|
68.1
|
-
|
141.0
|
||||
$225.0
|
$239.2
|
$-
|
$464.2
|
NOTE
9. DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System
Energy)
Entergy
holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear
decommissioning trust accounts. The NRC requires Entergy to maintain
trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford
3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades
(NYPA currently retains the decommissioning trusts and liabilities for Indian
Point 3 and FitzPatrick). The funds are invested primarily in equity
securities; fixed-rate, fixed-income securities; and cash and cash
equivalents.
Entergy
records the decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair
value. Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to
recover decommissioning costs in rates in accordance with the regulatory
treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have
recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment
securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets. For the
nonregulated portion of River Bend, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has recorded
an offsetting amount of unrealized
63
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
gains/(losses)
in other deferred credits/debits. Decommissioning costs for Pilgrim,
Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do not receive regulatory
treatment. Accordingly, unrealized gains recorded on the assets in
these trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income
component of common shareholders' equity because these assets are classified as
available for sale. Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market
value) on the assets in these trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated
other comprehensive income component of common shareholders' equity unless the
unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. If the unrealized loss is
other-than-temporary it is recorded in earnings. Generally, Entergy
records realized gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the
specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its
securities.
The
securities held at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$1,684
|
$229
|
$43
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
1,458
|
84
|
3
|
|||
Total
|
$3,142
|
$313
|
$46
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$1,436
|
$85
|
$177
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
1,396
|
77
|
21
|
|||
Total
|
$2,832
|
$162
|
$198
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $1,377 million and $1,340 million at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At September
30, 2009, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
4.67%, an average duration of approximately 5.07 years, and an average maturity
of approximately 8.2 years. The equity securities are generally held
in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the
Standard & Poor's 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the
securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire
4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index.
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at September 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$11
|
$1
|
$98
|
$2
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
262
|
42
|
26
|
1
|
||||
Total
|
$273
|
$43
|
$124
|
$3
|
The
unrealized losses in excess of twelve months on equity securities above relate
to Entergy's Utility operating companies and System Energy.
64
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$46
|
$21
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
602
|
526
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
465
|
490
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
113
|
146
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
55
|
52
|
||
20
years+
|
177
|
161
|
||
Total
|
$1,458
|
$1,396
|
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $451 million and $481 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $16 million and $6 million, respectively, and gross losses
of $2 million and $8 million, respectively, were either reclassified out of
other comprehensive income into earnings or recorded into earnings.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $1,733 million and $1,229 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $46 million and $20 million, respectively, and gross losses
of $28 million and $13 million, respectively, were either reclassified out of
other comprehensive income into earnings or recorded into earnings.
Entergy
Arkansas
Entergy
Arkansas holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in
nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$190.8
|
$51.1
|
$5.0
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
239.1
|
14.2
|
0.7
|
|||
Total
|
$429.9
|
$65.3
|
$5.7
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$165.6
|
$31.7
|
$13.7
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
224.9
|
12.8
|
2.4
|
|||
Total
|
$390.5
|
$44.5
|
$16.1
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $225.6 million and $214.5 million as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At September
30, 2009, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
4.62%, an average duration of approximately 4.58 years, and an average maturity
of approximately 5.6 years. The equity securities are generally held
in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are
held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500
Index.
65
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at September 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$-
|
$-
|
$16.5
|
$0.6
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
30.6
|
5.0
|
2.0
|
0.1
|
||||
Total
|
$30.6
|
$5.0
|
$18.5
|
$0.7
|
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$9.9
|
$2.0
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
117.7
|
127.0
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
98.4
|
93.9
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
4.2
|
2.0
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
3.1
|
-
|
||
20
years+
|
5.8
|
-
|
||
Total
|
$239.1
|
$224.9
|
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $31.9 million and $32.6 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $83.6 million and $137.5 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $0.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana holds
debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear
decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$154.1
|
$11.4
|
$9.0
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
187.6
|
14.1
|
0.4
|
|||
Total
|
$341.7
|
$25.5
|
$9.4
|
|||
66
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$132.3
|
$4.6
|
$24.5
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
170.9
|
8.7
|
3.3
|
|||
Total
|
$303.2
|
$13.3
|
$27.8
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $173.9 million and $165.5 million as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At September
30, 2009, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
4.82%, an average duration of approximately 6.52 years, and an average maturity
of approximately 9.3 years. The equity securities are generally held
in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are
held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500
Index.
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at September 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$-
|
$-
|
$8.8
|
$0.2
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
83.2
|
9.0
|
5.7
|
0.2
|
||||
Total
|
$83.2
|
$9.0
|
$14.5
|
$0.4
|
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$7.9
|
$6.5
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
27.8
|
36.5
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
80.2
|
75.7
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
44.6
|
36.0
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
18.0
|
8.7
|
||
20
years+
|
9.1
|
7.5
|
||
Total
|
$187.6
|
$170.9
|
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $8.7 million and $15.3 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $0.03 million and $0.03 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $42.4 million and $41.6 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $0.53 million and $0.13 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
67
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
Entergy
Louisiana
Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity
securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust
accounts. The securities held at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$112.1
|
$11.9
|
$7.8
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
91.1
|
4.7
|
0.6
|
|||
Total
|
$203.2
|
$16.6
|
$8.4
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$93.3
|
$3.9
|
$17.2
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
87.6
|
7.1
|
1.6
|
|||
Total
|
$180.9
|
$11.0
|
$18.8
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $87.0 million and $82.1 million as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At September
30, 2009, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
3.90%, an average duration of approximately 4.84 years, and an average maturity
of approximately 9.9 years. The equity securities are generally held
in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are
held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500
Index.
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at September 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$15.1
|
$-
|
$18.7
|
$0.3
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
49.1
|
7.8
|
1.2
|
0.3
|
||||
Total
|
$64.2
|
$7.8
|
$19.9
|
$0.6
|
68
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$2.0
|
$1.2
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
29.9
|
33.4
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
25.5
|
21.4
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
11.9
|
10.5
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
5.4
|
6.8
|
||
20
years+
|
16.4
|
14.3
|
||
Total
|
$91.1
|
$87.6
|
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $6.9 million and $5.9 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $0.2 million and $0.08 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $40.4 million and $15.2 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $1.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
System
Energy
System
Energy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in
nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
Fair
Value
|
Total
Unrealized
Gains
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||
2009
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$173.6
|
$13.3
|
$19.8
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
141.0
|
4.4
|
0.3
|
|||
Total
|
$314.6
|
$17.7
|
$20.1
|
|||
2008
|
||||||
Equity
Securities
|
$127.8
|
$2.0
|
$36.3
|
|||
Debt
Securities
|
141.0
|
6.9
|
3.9
|
|||
Total
|
$268.8
|
$8.9
|
$40.2
|
The
amortized cost of debt securities was $136.9 million and $138.0 million as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. At September
30, 2009, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately
4.29%, an average duration of approximately 4.69 years, and an average maturity
of approximately 7.7 years. The equity securities are generally held
in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard &
Poor's 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are
held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500
Index.
69
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
The fair
value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt
securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities
have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows at September 30,
2009:
Equity
Securities
|
Debt
Securities
|
|||||||
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||
(In
Millions)
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
$-
|
$-
|
$11.3
|
$-
|
||||
More
than 12 months
|
96.1
|
19.8
|
5.3
|
0.3
|
||||
Total
|
$96.1
|
$19.8
|
$16.6
|
$0.3
|
The fair
value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(In
Millions)
|
||||
less
than 1 year
|
$2.0
|
$2.0
|
||
1
year - 5 years
|
83.4
|
48.0
|
||
5
years - 10 years
|
32.0
|
44.0
|
||
10
years - 15 years
|
0.1
|
10.0
|
||
15
years - 20 years
|
1.0
|
1.2
|
||
20
years+
|
22.5
|
35.8
|
||
Total
|
$141.0
|
$141.0
|
||
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $16.1 million and $168.3 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $0.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $0.02 million and $1.6 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, proceeds from the
dispositions of securities amounted to $338.1 million and $344.8 million,
respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, gross gains of $3.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and gross
losses of $6.32 million and $2.9 million, respectively, were recorded in
earnings.
Other-than-temporary
impairments and unrealized gains and losses
Entergy,
Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System
Energy evaluate unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether
an other than temporary impairment has occurred. Effective January 1,
2009, Entergy adopted an accounting pronouncement providing guidance regarding
recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments related to
investments in debt securities. The assessment of whether an investment in
a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on
whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required
to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs. Further,
if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the
debt security, an other-than-temporary-impairment is considered to have occurred
and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected
less the amortized cost basis (credit loss). For debt securities held as
of January 1, 2009 for which an other-than-temporary impairment had
70
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
previously
been recognized but for which assessment under the new guidance indicates this
impairment is temporary, Entergy recorded an adjustment to its opening balance
of retained earnings of $11.3 million ($6.4 million net-of-tax). Entergy did not
have any material other than temporary impairments relating to credit losses on
debt securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
assessment of whether an investment in an equity security has suffered an other
than temporary impairment continues to be based on a number of factors
including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the
investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and,
then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a
reasonable period of time. Entergy's trusts are managed by third
parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment
guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments.
Non-Utility Nuclear did not record any material charges to other income in the
three months ended September 30, 2009. Non-Utility Nuclear recorded charges to
other income of $85 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
resulting from the recognition of the other than temporary impairment of certain
equity securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.
NOTE
10. INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Audits and
Litigation
See Note 3 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of tax proceedings. Following is an
update to that discussion.
2002-2003
IRS Audit
In September 2009, Entergy received a
partial agreement from the IRS for the years 2002 and 2003. It is a
partial agreement because Entergy did not agree to the IRS's adjustments for the
U.K. Windfall Tax foreign tax credit and the street lighting
issues. Entergy expects to receive a Notice of Deficiency from the
IRS on these two issues in the fourth quarter 2009. These issues will
be governed by the outcome of a previous U.S. Tax Court trial for the tax years
1997 and 1998 for which Entergy is awaiting a decision.
When Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
restructured effective December 31, 2005, Entergy Louisiana agreed, under the
terms of the merger plan, to indemnify its parent, Entergy Louisiana Holdings,
Inc. (formerly, Entergy Louisiana, Inc.) for certain tax obligations that are
arising from the above referenced IRS partial agreement. Because the
agreement with the IRS was finalized in the third quarter 2009, Entergy
Louisiana intends to pay Entergy Louisiana Holdings approximately $300 million
pursuant to these intercompany obligations in the fourth quarter
2009.
2006-2007
IRS Audit
The IRS commenced an examination of
Entergy's 2006 and 2007 U.S. federal income tax returns in the third quarter
2009.
NOTE
11. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2008 the FASB issued FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets"
(FSP 132(R)-1) that requires enhanced disclosures about plan assets of defined
benefit pension and other postretirement plans including disclosure of each
major category of plan assets using the fair value hierarchy and concentrations
of risk within plan assets. FSP 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2009.
In June 2009 the FASB issued SFAS 167,
"Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R". SFAS 167 replaces the
current quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which
enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to
direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
affect the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses
of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the
entity. SFAS 167 also requires additional disclosures on an interim
and annual basis about an enterprise's involvement in variable interest
entities. The standard will be effective for Entergy in the first quarter
2010. Entergy does not expect the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a material
effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows.
71
Entergy
Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Financial Statements
In August 2009 the FASB issued ASU No.
2009-05, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Measuring
Liabilities at Fair Value" that amends ASC Topic 820 to clarify guidance on fair
value measurements of liabilities when a quoted price in an active market for an
identical liability is not available. ASU No. 2009-05 will be
effective for Entergy in the fourth quarter 2009. Entergy does not
expect the adoption of ASU No. 2009-05 to have a material effect on its
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In the third quarter 2009, Entergy
adopted the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as required by SFAS
168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles." The ASC is the source of
authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB. Entergy will also
continue to apply the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as an
authoritative source of GAAP. The adoption of the ASC did not have
any effect on the financial statements included herein.
__________________________________
In the opinion of the management of
Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy
Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas and System
Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of
previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for
a fair statement of the results for the interim periods
presented. The business of the Registrant Subsidiaries is subject to
seasonal fluctuations, however, with the peak periods occurring during the third
quarter. The results for the interim periods presented should not be
used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full
year.
72
Part
I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As of September 30, 2009, evaluations
were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy
Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana,
Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy
(individually "Registrant" and collectively the "Registrants") management,
including their respective Chief Executive Officers (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officers (CFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the
Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the
evaluations, each CEO and CFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or
Registrants for which they serve as CEO or CFO, the Registrant's or Registrants'
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms; and that the Registrant's or Registrants' disclosure controls
and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information
is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's or Registrants' management,
including their respective CEOs and CFOs, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the
participation of the Registrants' management, including their respective CEOs
and CFOs, the Registrants evaluated changes in internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and found no
change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, internal control over financial reporting.
73
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net income increased $2.7 million
primarily due to higher net revenue, lower taxes other than income taxes, and
higher other income, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization
expenses, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and higher nuclear
refueling outage expenses.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net income decreased $15.1 million
primarily due to higher depreciation and amortization expenses, higher other
operation and maintenance expenses, higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, a
higher effective income tax rate, and higher interest expense, partially offset
by higher net revenue and lower taxes other than income taxes.
Net
Revenue
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008.
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$330.6
|
|
Purchased
power capacity
|
12.7
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
7.1
|
|
Storm
cost recovery
|
5.1
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
5.1
|
|
Volume/weather
|
(16.1)
|
|
Other
|
(7.0)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$337.5
|
The purchased power capacity variance
is primarily due to lower purchased power capacity costs due to Ouachita interim
tolling agreement costs incurred in 2008 prior to the
2008 Ouachita purchase.
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to improved results from wholesale contracts and lower fuel
assigned due to lower gas prices in the third quarter 2009 compared to the third
quarter 2008.
The storm cost recovery variance is due
to the recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm costs as approved by the APSC,
effective January 2009. The recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm
costs is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K.
74
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to increases in the capacity acquisition rider related to the
Ouachita acquisition. The net income effect of the Ouachita cost
recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with
the remainder offset by Ouachita plant costs in other operation and maintenance
expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income taxes.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to an 11.8% volume decrease in industrial sales primarily in the
mid to small customer class, less favorable volume during the unbilled sales
period compared to the same period in 2008, and the effect of less favorable
weather.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $48 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in
the average price of energy available for resale sales and a decrease in
volume as a result of less energy available for resale
sales;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $41.3 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a change
in the energy cost recovery rider effective April 2009 and decreased
usage. See Note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion
of the energy cost recovery rider filing;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $16.1 million related to volume/weather, as discussed
above.
|
The
decrease was offset by an increase of $46 million in rider
revenues.
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market price of purchased
power.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$858.7
|
|
Purchased
power capacity
|
22.0
|
|
Storm
cost recovery
|
13.6
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
11.1
|
|
Volume/weather
|
(21.8)
|
|
Other
|
(3.6)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$880.0
|
The purchased power capacity variance
is primarily due to lower purchased power capacity costs due to Ouachita interim
tolling agreement costs incurred in 2008 prior to the
2008 Ouachita purchase.
The storm cost recovery variance is due
to the recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm costs as approved by the APSC,
effective January 2009. The recovery of 2008 extraordinary storm
costs is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form
10-K.
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to increases in the capacity acquisition rider related to the
Ouachita acquisition. The net income effect of the Ouachita cost
recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with
the remainder offset by Ouachita plant costs in other operation and maintenance
expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income taxes.
75
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to a 13.2% volume decrease in industrial sales primarily in the
mid to small customer class and the effect of less favorable
weather.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $120.3 million in gross wholesale revenue due to
a decrease in the average price of energy available for resale sales and a
decrease of $21.8 million related to volume/weather, as discussed
above. The decrease was offset by an increase of $56.2 million in
rider revenues.
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market price of purchased
power.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
increased primarily due to the amortization of higher expenses associated with
the planned maintenance and refueling outage at ANO 1 which ended in December
2008.
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $4.6 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
|
·
|
an
increase of $3.3 million in customer service costs as a result of
write-offs of uncollectible customer accounts;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $2.2 million due to the addition of the Ouachita plant to the
fossil fleet in September 2008.
|
The
increase was partially offset by prior year storm damage charges as a result of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike which hit Entergy Arkansas' service territory
in September 2008.
Taxes other than income taxes decreased
primarily due to a decrease in ad valorem taxes due to a lower assessment in
2009.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other income increased primarily due to
an increase of $3.7 million in interest earned on decommissioning trust
funds.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Nuclear refueling outage expenses
increased primarily due to the amortization of higher expenses associated with
the planned maintenance and refueling outage at ANO 1 which ended in December
2008.
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $11.8 million in nuclear expenses primarily due to increased
nuclear labor and contract costs;
|
·
|
an
increase of $10 million due to the addition of the Ouachita plant to the
fossil fleet in September 2008;
|
·
|
an
increase of $7.9 million due to higher fossil plant outage costs in
2009;
|
·
|
an
increase in legal expenses as a result of a reimbursement in April 2008 of
$7 million of costs in connection with a litigation settlement;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $6.0 million in customer service costs primarily as a result
of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts.
|
76
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The
increase was partially offset by prior year storm damage charges as a result of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike which hit Entergy Arkansas' service territory
in September 2008 and several storms hitting Entergy Arkansas' service territory
in the first quarter 2008 and a decrease of $12.5 million due to the
capitalization of Ouachita service charges previously expensed.
Taxes other than income taxes decreased
primarily due to a decrease in ad valorem taxes due to a lower assessment in
2009.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Interest expense increased primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as a result of the issuance of
$300 million of 5.40% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2008.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 44.2%
for the third quarter 2009 and 48.7% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third
quarter 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35.0% are primarily due to certain book and tax differences
related to utility plant items and state income taxes, partially offset by the
amortization of investment tax credits.
The
effective income tax rate was 44.3% for the third quarter 2008 and 44.8% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The difference in the effective income tax
rates for the third quarter 2008 and the nine months ended September 30, 2008
versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily due to book and tax
differences related to utility plant items and state income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$39,568
|
$212
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
321,846
|
255,214
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(246,760)
|
(466,580)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(45,186)
|
213,728
|
|||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
29,900
|
2,362
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$69,468
|
$2,574
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow from operations increased
$66.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to an increase in recovery of fuel
costs, a decrease of $20.4 million in pension contributions, and income tax
payments of $17 million in 2009 compared to income tax payments of $36.2 million
in 2008, partially offset by ice storm restoration spending in
2009.
77
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities decreased $219.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the
purchase of the Ouachita plant for $210 million in September 2008, decreases in
nuclear construction expenditures resulting from various nuclear projects that
occurred in 2008, and decreases in distribution construction expenditures
resulting from Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike in 2008. The
decrease was partially offset by an increase in distribution construction
expenditures as a result of an ice storm hitting Entergy Arkansas' service
territory in the first quarter 2009.
Financing
Activities
Financing activities used $45.2 million
of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to providing
$213.7 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily
due to the following:
·
|
issuance
of $300 million of 5.4% Series first mortgage bonds in July
2008;
|
·
|
an
increase of $32.9 million in common stock dividends paid in 2009;
and
|
·
|
money
pool activity.
|
Decreases
in Entergy Arkansas' payable to the money pool is a use of cash flow, and
Entergy Arkansas' payable to the money pool decreased by $72.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The money pool is an
inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries'
need for external short-term borrowings.
Capital
Structure
Entergy
Arkansas' capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
52.1%
|
52.9%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.0%
|
0.6%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
53.1%
|
53.5%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock
without sinking fund, and shareholders' equity. Net capital consists
of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Arkansas uses the
net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes
it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating
Entergy Arkansas' financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of Entergy Arkansas' uses and sources of capital. Entergy
Arkansas is developing its capital plan for 2010 through 2012 and currently
anticipates making $1.4 billion in capital investments during that period,
including approximately $592 million for maintenance of existing
assets. The remaining $817 million is associated with specific
investments such as environmental compliance spending, including the White Bluff
project, transmission upgrades and system improvements, and other investments,
such as potential opportunities through the Utility's supply plan initiatives
that support its ability to meet load growth. Following are
additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
In April
2009, Entergy Arkansas renewed its credit facility through April 2010 in the
amount of $88 million. There were no outstanding borrowings under the
Entergy Arkansas credit facility as of September 30, 2009.
78
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Entergy
Arkansas' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as
follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$23,796
|
$15,991
|
($5,747)
|
($77,882)
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
White Bluff Coal Plant
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the environmental compliance project that will install scrubbers and low NOx
burners at Entergy Arkansas' White Bluff coal plant. In March 2009,
Entergy Arkansas made a filing with the APSC seeking a declaratory order that
the White Bluff project is in the public interest. In May 2009 the
APSC Staff filed a motion requesting that the APSC require Entergy Arkansas to
file testimony on several issues. In a subsequent order the APSC set
a procedural schedule that includes an evidentiary hearing beginning in March
2010. In addition, in June 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed with the
APSC, under Arkansas Act 310, an interim surcharge to recover the costs incurred
through May 31, 2009, on the White Bluff project. Entergy Arkansas
incurred $1.9 million through May 31, 2009. Under Arkansas Act 310
the surcharge goes into effect immediately upon filing, subject to refund, and
additional surcharge filings are permitted every six months. On July
20, 2009, the APSC staff filed a motion with the APSC requesting that the APSC
enter an order regarding the conduct of this and subsequent Act 310 filings
related to the White Bluff project, including requiring Entergy Arkansas to
provide additional information and justification for costs recovered pursuant to
Act 310. In July 2009 the Arkansas attorney general filed a motion in
the Act 310 proceeding opposing the imposition of the surcharge, and challenging
Entergy Arkansas' cost calculation.
In October 2009, Entergy Arkansas
lowered the estimate of its share of the project costs from $630 million to $465
million.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Ouachita Power
Plant
In August 2008, the LPSC issued an
order approving an uncontested settlement between Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
and the LPSC Staff authorizing Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's purchase, under a
life-of-unit agreement, of one-third of the capacity and energy from the 789 MW
Ouachita power plant, which Entergy Arkansas acquired on
September 30, 2008. The LPSC's approval was subject to
certain conditions, including a study to determine the costs and benefits of
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana exercising an option to purchase one-third of the
plant (Unit 3) from Entergy Arkansas. In April 2009, Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana made a filing with the LPSC seeking approval of Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana exercising its option to convert its purchased power agreement
into the ownership interest in Unit 3 and a one-third interest in the Ouachita
common facilities. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana estimates that the
purchase price will be approximately $72.6 million, subject to change based on
several factors, including the timing of the closing. The filing also
requested LPSC approval of the cost-recovery mechanism for the
acquisition. In September 2009 the LPSC, pursuant to an uncontested
settlement, approved the acquisition and cost recovery mechanism. In
addition, in April 2009, Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
filed with the FERC for its approval of the transaction, and in June 2009 the
FERC issued an order approving the transaction. Entergy currently expects the closing
to take place in the fourth quarter 2009.
79
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Retail
Rates
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
the rate filing made by Entergy Arkansas and the proceedings regarding that
filing. On April 23, 2009, the Arkansas Supreme Court denied Entergy
Arkansas' petition for review of the Court of Appeals decision.
On September 4, 2009, Entergy Arkansas
filed with the APSC for a general change in rates, charges, and
tariffs. Entergy Arkansas requested a $223.2 million base rate
increase that would become effective in July 2010. The filing
reflects an 11.5% return on equity using a projected capital structure, and
proposes a formula rate plan mechanism. Proposed formula rate plan
provisions include a +/- 25 basis point bandwidth, with earnings outside the
bandwidth reset to the 11.5% return on common equity midpoint and rates changing
on a prospective basis depending on whether Entergy Arkansas is over or
under-earning. The proposed formula rate plan also includes a
recovery mechanism for APSC-approved costs for additional capacity purchases or
construction/acquisition of new transmission or generating
facilities. The filing also requests recovery of 2009 ice storm costs
over 10 years if it is expected that securitization will not produce lower costs
for customers. Entergy Arkansas is also seeking an increase in its
annual storm damage accrual from $14.4 million to $22.3 million. The
APSC scheduled hearings in the proceeding beginning in May 2010.
Energy
Cost Recovery Rider
In March 2009, Entergy Arkansas filed
with the APSC its annual energy cost rate for the period April 2009 through
March 2010. The filed energy cost rate decreased from $0.02456/kWh to
$0.01552/kWh. The decrease was caused by the following: 1) all three
of the nuclear power plants from which Entergy Arkansas obtains power, ANO 1 and
2 and Grand Gulf, had refueling outages in 2008, and the previous energy cost
rate had been adjusted to account for the replacement power costs that would be
incurred while these units were down; 2) Entergy Arkansas has a deferred fuel
cost liability from over-recovered fuel costs at December 31, 2008, as compared
to a deferred fuel cost asset from under-recovered fuel costs at December 31,
2007; offset by 3) an increase in the fuel and purchased power prices included
in the calculation.
In August 2009, as provided for by its
energy cost recovery rider, Entergy Arkansas filed with the APSC an interim
revision to its energy cost rate. The revised energy cost rate is a
decrease from $0.01552/kWh to $0.01206/kWh. The decrease was caused
by a decrease in natural gas and purchased power prices from the levels used in
setting the rate in March 2009. The interim revised energy cost rate
went into effect for the first billing cycle of September 2009. In
its order approving the new rate, the APSC ordered Entergy Arkansas to show
cause why the rate should not be further reduced. In its September
14, 2009 response, Entergy Arkansas explained that it used the same methodology
it had used in previous interim revisions, which is based on estimating what the
rate would be in the next annual update based on the information known at the
time. There has been no further activity in this
proceeding.
Storm
Cost Recovery
Entergy Arkansas Storm
Reserve Accounting
The APSC's June 2007 order in Entergy
Arkansas' base rate proceeding, which is discussed in the Form 10-K, eliminated
storm reserve accounting for Entergy Arkansas. In March 2009 a law
was enacted in Arkansas that requires the APSC to permit storm reserve
accounting for utilities that request it. Entergy Arkansas filed its
request with the APSC, and has reinstated storm reserve accounting effective
January 1, 2009.
80
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Entergy Arkansas January
2009 Ice Storm
In January 2009 a severe ice storm
caused significant damage to Entergy Arkansas' transmission and distribution
lines, equipment, poles, and other facilities. The current cost
estimate for the damage caused by the ice storm is in the lower end of the range
of approximately $120 million to $140 million, of which approximately $65
million to $80 million is estimated to be operating and maintenance type costs
and the remainder is estimated to be capital investment. On January
30, 2009, the APSC issued an order inviting and encouraging electric public
utilities to file specific proposals for the recovery of extraordinary storm
restoration expenses associated with the ice storm. On February 16,
2009, Entergy Arkansas filed a request with the APSC for an accounting order
authorizing deferral of the operating and maintenance cost portion of Entergy
Arkansas' ice storm restoration costs pending their recovery. The
APSC issued such an order in March 2009 subject to certain conditions, including
that if Entergy Arkansas seeks to recover the deferred costs, those costs will
be subject to investigation for whether they are incremental, prudent, and
reasonable. Entergy Arkansas is still analyzing its options for the
method of recovery of the ice storm restoration costs. One option is
securitization, and in April 2009 a law was enacted in Arkansas that authorizes
securitization of storm damage restoration costs. Entergy Arkansas'
September 2009 general rate filing requests recovery of the 2009 ice storm costs
over 10 years if it is expected that securitization would not produce lower
costs for customers.
Arkansas
Attorney General and AEEC appeals
As discussed in the Form 10-K, the
Arkansas attorney general and the AEEC appealed a December 2007 APSC order that
addressed Entergy Arkansas' production cost allocation, energy cost recovery,
and capacity costs riders. Pursuant to a motion of the Arkansas
attorney general and the AEEC, in September 2009 the Arkansas Court of Appeals
dismissed the appeal.
Federal
Regulation
See "System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in the "Rate,
Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the
discussion in the Form 10-K.
Utility
Restructuring
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Utility
Restructuring" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility
restructuring.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Nuclear
Matters" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear
matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks"
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See
"MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas' accounting for nuclear
decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other
postretirement benefits.
81
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs
In the
first quarter 2009, Entergy Arkansas recorded a revision to its estimated
decommissioning cost liabilities for ANO 1 and 2 as a result of a revised
decommissioning cost study. The revised estimates resulted in an $8.9
million reduction in its decommissioning liability, along with a corresponding
reduction in the related regulatory asset.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
82
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 649,395 | $ | 711,835 | $ | 1,703,398 | $ | 1,791,671 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
29,386 | 49,268 | 296,907 | 216,533 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
284,755 | 336,048 | 531,029 | 725,890 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
10,669 | 7,438 | 30,630 | 21,655 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
123,033 | 119,207 | 355,033 | 342,878 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
8,477 | 8,843 | 25,967 | 26,091 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
20,980 | 27,106 | 60,951 | 65,325 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
63,699 | 59,716 | 189,328 | 176,020 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(2,270 | ) | (4,084 | ) | (4,514 | ) | (9,477 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
538,729 | 603,542 | 1,485,331 | 1,564,915 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
110,666 | 108,293 | 218,067 | 226,756 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
1,804 | 1,583 | 4,429 | 4,924 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
5,791 | 3,377 | 12,810 | 14,180 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(680 | ) | (492 | ) | (2,750 | ) | (2,226 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
6,915 | 4,468 | 14,489 | 16,878 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
21,261 | 21,340 | 64,159 | 58,175 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
2,540 | 2,122 | 4,424 | 5,968 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(1,008 | ) | (882 | ) | (2,655 | ) | (2,482 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
22,793 | 22,580 | 65,928 | 61,661 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
94,788 | 90,181 | 166,628 | 181,973 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
41,849 | 39,908 | 81,196 | 81,460 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
52,939 | 50,273 | 85,432 | 100,513 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
1,718 | 1,718 | 5,155 | 5,155 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK
|
$ | 51,221 | $ | 48,555 | $ | 80,277 | $ | 95,358 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
83
(Page left blank intentionally)
84
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 85,432 | $ | 100,513 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Reserve
for regulatory adjustments
|
(741 | ) | (2,167 | ) | ||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(4,514 | ) | (9,477 | ) | ||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
215,295 | 202,111 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
56,579 | 66,291 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
(12,459 | ) | 30,045 | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
735 | (7,917 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(258,033 | ) | (231,263 | ) | ||||
Interest
accrued
|
(1,606 | ) | 7,161 | |||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
73,018 | 4,253 | ||||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
217,620 | 140,572 | ||||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(2,494 | ) | 534 | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(24,704 | ) | 26,396 | |||||
Other
|
(22,282 | ) | (71,838 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
321,846 | 255,214 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(235,543 | ) | (251,917 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
4,429 | 4,924 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(69,403 | ) | (94,489 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
69,326 | 94,489 | ||||||
Payment
for purchase of plant
|
- | (210,029 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
83,648 | 137,509 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(91,412 | ) | (147,072 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(7,805 | ) | - | |||||
Other
|
- | 5 | ||||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(246,760 | ) | (466,580 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
- | 298,001 | ||||||
Change
in money pool payable - net
|
- | (72,135 | ) | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(39,800 | ) | (6,900 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(5,155 | ) | (5,155 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(231 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(45,186 | ) | 213,728 | |||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
29,900 | 2,362 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
39,568 | 212 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 69,468 | $ | 2,574 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 66,358 | $ | 50,315 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 17,008 | $ | 36,174 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
85
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 155 | $ | 3,292 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
69,313 | 36,276 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash investments
|
69,468 | 39,568 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
128,925 | 113,135 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(22,632 | ) | (19,882 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
68,108 | 56,534 | ||||||
Other
|
52,850 | 64,762 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
78,680 | 71,118 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
305,931 | 285,667 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
46,043 | 119,061 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
14,488 | 15,223 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
131,861 | 121,769 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
40,769 | 42,932 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
167,225 | 394,000 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
48,324 | 36,530 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
824,109 | 1,054,750 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
11,200 | 11,200 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
429,962 | 390,529 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,436 | 1,439 | ||||||
Other
|
2,976 | 5,391 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
445,574 | 408,559 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
7,683,184 | 7,305,165 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
1,378 | 1,417 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
105,164 | 142,391 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
143,866 | 125,072 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
10,066 | 12,115 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
7,943,658 | 7,586,160 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
3,560,419 | 3,272,280 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
4,383,239 | 4,313,880 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
47,224 | 58,455 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
726,444 | 688,964 | ||||||
Other
|
27,171 | 43,605 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
800,839 | 791,024 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 6,453,761 | $ | 6,568,213 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
86
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 100,000 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
200,732 | 433,460 | ||||||
Other
|
116,948 | 142,974 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
66,748 | 60,558 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
105,144 | 198,902 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
23,601 | 25,207 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
60,281 | 60,276 | ||||||
Other
|
19,253 | 17,290 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
692,707 | 938,667 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
1,450,231 | 1,307,596 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
48,902 | 51,881 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
84,963 | 66,214 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
59,627 | 27,141 | ||||||
Decommissioning
|
557,765 | 540,709 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
13,431 | 15,925 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
427,342 | 441,920 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,518,481 | 1,618,171 | ||||||
Other
|
43,626 | 43,780 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
4,204,368 | 4,113,337 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock without sinking fund
|
116,350 | 116,350 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 325,000,000
|
||||||||
shares;
issued and outstanding 46,980,196 shares in 2009
|
||||||||
and
2008
|
470 | 470 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
588,444 | 588,444 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
851,422 | 810,945 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,440,336 | 1,399,859 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 6,453,761 | $ | 6,568,213 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
87
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 250 | $ | 249 | $ | 1 | - | |||||||||
Commercial
|
146 | 143 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
129 | 140 | (11 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
6 | 6 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
531 | 538 | (7 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
94 | 123 | (29 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
23 | 42 | (19 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
1 | 9 | (8 | ) | (89 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 649 | $ | 712 | $ | ( 63 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
2,307 | 2,354 | (47 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,745 | 1,758 | (13 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,744 | 1,977 | (233 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
76 | 79 | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
5,872 | 6,168 | (296 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
2,529 | 2,290 | 239 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
189 | 516 | (327 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
8,590 | 8,974 | (384 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 611 | $ | 586 | $ | 25 | 4 | |||||||||
Commercial
|
366 | 346 | 20 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
326 | 342 | (16 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
17 | 15 | 2 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
1,320 | 1,289 | 31 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
253 | 334 | (81 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
80 | 119 | (39 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
50 | 50 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,703 | $ | 1,792 | $ | ( 89 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
5,897 | 6,049 | (152 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Commercial
|
4,456 | 4,489 | (33 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
4,733 | 5,454 | (721 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
204 | 209 | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
15,290 | 16,201 | (911 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
6,929 | 6,207 | 722 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
1,215 | 1,647 | (432 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
23,434 | 24,055 | (621 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
88
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana's service territory in September 2008. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike storm cost recovery case with the LPSC in May
2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a determination that $152.6
million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and seeks to replenish its
storm reserve in the amount of $90 million. Entergy Louisiana seeks a
determination that $267.4 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $200
million. The storm restoration costs are net of costs that have
already been paid from previously funded storm reserves. In September
2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana made a supplemental
filing to, among other things, recommend recovery of the costs and replenishment
of the storm reserves by Louisiana Act 55 (passed in 2007)
financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing. The parties have agreed to a procedural schedule that
includes March 2010 hearing dates for both the recoverability and the method of
recovery proceedings.
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net income decreased by $13.7 million
primarily due to lower net revenue, higher other operation and maintenance
expenses, and a higher effective income tax rate, partially offset by lower
taxes other than income taxes and lower interest and other charges.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net income decreased by $11.8 million
primarily due to lower net revenue, lower other income, and a higher effective
income tax rate, partially offset by lower taxes other than income taxes and
lower interest and other charges.
Net
Revenue
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$241.3
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
(20.7)
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(10.7)
|
|
Volume/weather
|
19.0
|
|
Other
|
(0.2)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$228.7
|
89
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The net
wholesale variance is primarily due to fuel recovery timing differences from
municipal and co-op customers.
The
retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
·
|
a
formula rate plan provision of $3.7 million recorded in the third quarter
2009 for refunds that will be made to customers in accordance with a
settlement approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial
statements for further discussion of the
settlement;
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing; and
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as well as
the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is offset
in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by a formula rate plan increase effective
September 2008. Refer to "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation
-Retail Rates - Electric" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume, including the effects of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike which decreased sales volume in 2008, and the
effect of more favorable weather.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $269.1 million in
electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and a decrease of
$76.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue due to a decrease in the average
price of energy available for resale sales.
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average
market price of purchased power and a decrease in deferred fuel expense due to
decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$643.8
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(21.8)
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
(16.6)
|
|
Volume/weather
|
19.3
|
|
Other
|
1.4
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$626.1
|
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to:
·
|
a
formula rate plan provision of $3.7 million recorded in the third quarter
2009 for refunds that will be made to customers in accordance with a
settlement approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial
statements for further discussion of the
settlement;
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing; and
|
90
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as well as
the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is offset
in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2 to the
financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by a formula rate plan increase effective
September 2008. Refer to "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation -
Retail Rates - Electric" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan.
The net
wholesale variance is primarily due to fuel recovery timing differences from
municipal and co-op customers.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume, including the effects of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike which decreased sales volume in 2008, and the
effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled sales period.
Gross
operating revenues and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $502.8 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $122.8 million in affiliated wholesale revenue due to a
decrease in the average price of energy available for resale sales, offset
by an increase in net generation and purchases resulting in more energy
available for resale sales; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $26.3 million in gross gas revenue primarily due to lower fuel
rates.
|
Purchased
power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in volume and the average
market price of purchased power.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $4.4 million in nuclear labor and contract
costs;
|
·
|
an
increase of $3.1 million in fossil expenses primarily due to higher plant
maintenance costs and plant outages;
and
|
·
|
an
increase of $1.2 million in payroll-related
costs.
|
Taxes other than income taxes decreased
primarily due to a decrease in local franchise taxes as a result of lower
residential and commercial revenue.
Interest and other charges decreased
primarily due to a decrease in long-term debt outstanding, partially offset by
higher interest on deferred fuel costs.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Taxes
other than income taxes decreased primarily due to a decrease in local franchise
taxes as a result of lower residential and commercial revenue.
91
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Other
income decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $11.5 million in interest and dividend income related to the
debt assumption agreement with Entergy Texas. Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana remains primarily liable on this debt, of which $699
million remained outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and $930 million
remained outstanding as of September 30,
2008;
|
·
|
the
cessation of $4.7 million in carrying charges on Hurricane Katrina and
Hurricane Rita storm restoration costs as a result of the Act 55 storm
cost financing; and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $2.6 million in interest earned on money pool
investments.
|
The
decrease is partially offset by distributions of $8.7 million earned on
preferred membership interests purchased from Entergy Holdings Company with the
proceeds received from the Act 55 storm cost financings and $4.6 million in
carrying charges on Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm restoration
costs. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing.
Interest and other charges decreased
primarily due to a decrease in long-term debt outstanding, partially offset by
higher interest on deferred fuel costs.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 37.2%
for the third quarter 2009 and 38.6% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to book and tax differences related to
utility plant items and state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax
differences related to storm cost financing, the amortization of investment tax
credits, flow-through book and tax timing differences, and book and tax
differences related to allowance for equity funds used during
construction.
The effective income tax rate was 30.1%
for the third quarter 2008 and 35.1% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is due to flow-through
book and tax timing differences and book and tax differences related to storm
cost financing and to utility plant items, partially offset by state income
taxes.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$49,303
|
$108,036
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
261,353
|
506,242
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(155,064)
|
(554,784)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(23,607)
|
64,668
|
|||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
82,682
|
16,126
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$131,985
|
$124,162
|
92
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Operating
Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating
activities decreased $244.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to storm cost
proceeds of $274.7 million received from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration
Corporation (LURC) as a result of the Act 55 storm cost financings in 2008 and
income tax payments of $29.3 million in 2009 compared to income tax payments of
$2.3 million in 2008, partially offset by a decrease of $30.8 million in pension
contributions.
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities decreased $399.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due
to:
·
|
the
investment of $189.4 million in affiliate securities and the investment of
$85.3 million in the storm reserve escrow account in 2008 as a result of
the Act 55 storm cost financings. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost
financing;
|
·
|
the
purchase of the Calcasieu Generating Facility for $56 million in March
2008. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of this purchase;
|
·
|
a
decrease in nuclear construction expenditures resulting from various
nuclear projects in 2008, including work done during the spring 2008
refueling outage at River Bend and Hurricane Gustav damage;
and
|
·
|
timing
differences between nuclear fuel purchases and fuel trust
reimbursements.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by money pool activity. Increases in
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's receivable from the money pool are a use of cash
flow, and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's receivable from the money pool
increased by $33.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to increasing by $15 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement
designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for external short-term
borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Financing activities used cash of $23.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to providing cash
of $64.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to
borrowing of $100 million on Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's credit facility in
2008, partially offset by a decrease in common equity
distributions.
Capital
Structure
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's
capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following
table. The
calculation below does not reduce the debt by the debt assumed by Entergy Texas
($699 million as of September 30, 2009, and $770 million as of December 31,
2008) because Entergy Gulf States Louisiana remains primarily liable on the
debt.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
58.6%
|
61.6%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.5%
|
0.6%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
60.1%
|
62.2%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and members'
equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash
equivalents. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana uses the net debt to net
capital
93
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
ratio in
analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to
its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's
financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana's uses and sources of capital. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is
developing its capital plan for 2010 through 2012 and currently anticipates
making $726 million in capital investments during that period, including
approximately $381 million for maintenance of existing assets. The
remaining $345 million is associated with specific investments such as
environmental compliance spending, transmission upgrades and system
improvements, and other investments such as potential opportunities through the
Utility's supply plan initiatives that support its ability to meet load growth,
including the pending Ouachita acquisition. Following are additional
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's
receivables from the money pool were as follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$44,970
|
$11,589
|
$70,533
|
$55,509
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
As
discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has a credit facility
in the amount of $100 million scheduled to expire in August 2012. No
borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of September 30,
2009.
In October 2009, Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana issued $300 million of 5.59% Series first mortgage bonds due October
2024. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana will use the proceeds to pay on
or prior to maturity its first mortgage bonds, Floating Rate Series due December
2009, which have an outstanding aggregate principal amount of $219,470,000 (of
which Entergy Texas is obligated to pay approximately $100.5 million in
principal amount), for working capital, and for general corporate
purposes.
Little Gypsy Repowering
Project
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana's Little Gypsy repowering
project. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana no longer expects to
participate in the project.
Ouachita Power
Plant
In August
2008, the LPSC issued an order approving an uncontested settlement between
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and the LPSC Staff authorizing Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana's purchase, under a life-of-unit agreement, of one-third of the
capacity and energy from the 789 MW Ouachita power plant, which Entergy Arkansas
acquired on September 30, 2008. The LPSC's approval was
subject to certain conditions, including a study to determine the costs and
benefits of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana exercising an option to purchase
one-third of the plant (Unit 3) from Entergy Arkansas. In April 2009,
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made a filing with the LPSC seeking approval of
Entergy Gulf States
94
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Louisiana
exercising its option to convert its purchased power agreement into the
ownership interest in Unit 3 and a one-third interest in the Ouachita common
facilities. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana estimates that the purchase
price will be approximately $72.6 million, subject to change based on several
factors, including the timing of the closing. The filing also
requested LPSC approval of the cost-recovery mechanism for the
acquisition. In September 2009 the LPSC, pursuant to an uncontested
settlement, approved the acquisition and cost recovery mechanism. In
addition, in April 2009, Entergy Arkansas and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
filed with the FERC for its approval of the transaction, and in June 2009 the
FERC issued an order approving the transaction. Entergy currently
expects the closing to take place in the fourth quarter 2009.
Pension
Contributions
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Jurisdictional Separation of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf
States, Inc. into two vertically integrated utility companies, one operating
under the sole retail jurisdiction of the PUCT, Entergy Texas, and the other
operating under the sole retail jurisdiction of the LPSC, Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana. Pursuant to the LPSC order approving the jurisdictional
separation plan, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made two compliance filings in
2008. On March 31, 2008, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made its
jurisdictional separation plan balance sheet compliance filing with the
LPSC. On June 11, 2008, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made its
revenue and expense compliance filing. On December 29, 2008, the LPSC
staff filed a motion with the LPSC seeking resolution of certain issues in the
proceeding. The remaining issues between the parties relate to the
LPSC allegation that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana violated the terms of the
LPSC approval of the jurisdictional separation in accounting for the transfer of
the Spindletop regulatory asset to Entergy Texas.
On
October 29, 2009, the LPSC staff and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana entered into
a stipulation for the purpose of settling the issues in the
proceeding. The LPSC staff and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana have
requested that the LPSC issue a final order finding that adherence by Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana to the terms of the stipulation shall constitute
compliance with the jurisdictional separation plan order. Under the
stipulation, Entergy Texas shall continue to bill Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
the annual revenue requirement associated with the former Spindletop regulatory
asset, now recorded by Entergy Texas as a miscellaneous deferred
debit. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana shall continue to recover in
retail rates from its customers the amounts so billed by Entergy
Texas. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana agrees that the new "Spindletop
regulatory asset" on its books since the time of the separation has not been, is
not, and shall not be used to determine the level of rates paid by Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana customers. The stipulation must be approved by the
LPSC and no date for that approval has been set at this time.
The
question whether the Spindletop regulatory asset costs should be included in the
System Agreement rough production cost equalization remedy calculation is also
currently pending before the FERC in a complaint filed at the FERC by the LPSC,
and in an initial decision, the FERC ALJ rejected the LPSC's complaint and
determined that the costs related to the Spindletop regulatory asset are not
production costs.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the
2007 test year. In October 2009 the LPSC approved a settlement that
resolves the 2007 test year filing. The settlement provides for a new
formula rate plan for the 2008, 2009, and 2010 test years. Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana is permitted, effective with the November 2009 billing
cycle, to reset its rates to achieve a 10.65% return on equity for the 2008 test
year. 10.65% is the target midpoint return on equity for the new
formula rate plan, with an earnings bandwidth of +/- 75 basis points (9.90% -
11.40%). The rate reset, a $36.7 million increase, was
implemented for the November 2009 billing cycle, and
95
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
the rate
reset will be subject to refund pending review of the 2008 test year filing that
was made on October 21, 2009. The settlement does not allow recovery
through the formula rate plan of most of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's costs
associated with Entergy's stock option plan. Pursuant to the
settlement Entergy Gulf States Louisiana will refund to its customers $3.7
million, which includes interest, in the November 2009 billing
cycle.
In
January 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate
stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2008. The filing
showed a revenue deficiency of $529 thousand based on a return on common equity
mid-point of 10.5%. In April 2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
implemented a $255 thousand rate increase pursuant to an uncontested settlement
with the LPSC staff.
Federal
Regulation
See
"System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries' Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form
10-K.
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Industrial
and Commercial Customers" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial
and commercial customers.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Nuclear
Matters" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear
matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Gulf States Louisiana's accounting for
nuclear decommissioning costs, the application of regulatory accounting
principles, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement
benefits.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries' Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
96
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 477,825 | $ | 840,696 | $ | 1,367,696 | $ | 2,042,483 | ||||||||
Natural
gas
|
8,947 | 16,186 | 49,244 | 75,499 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
486,772 | 856,882 | 1,416,940 | 2,117,982 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
65,320 | 180,362 | 239,007 | 262,478 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
203,647 | 441,998 | 555,111 | 1,214,183 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
5,375 | 8,571 | 15,903 | 20,354 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
85,089 | 74,785 | 247,189 | 245,749 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
3,431 | 3,165 | 10,089 | 9,304 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
17,373 | 22,621 | 52,542 | 59,306 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
33,384 | 35,090 | 101,115 | 102,324 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(10,865 | ) | (6,821 | ) | (3,298 | ) | (2,434 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
402,754 | 759,771 | 1,217,658 | 1,911,264 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
84,018 | 97,111 | 199,282 | 206,718 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
1,220 | 1,476 | 4,504 | 4,391 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
19,387 | 19,900 | 54,491 | 62,169 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(2,280 | ) | (1,650 | ) | (5,501 | ) | (3,678 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
18,327 | 19,726 | 53,494 | 62,882 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
26,534 | 30,439 | 81,632 | 93,691 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
3,020 | 1,553 | 7,585 | 3,117 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(802 | ) | (897 | ) | (2,835 | ) | (2,707 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
28,752 | 31,095 | 86,382 | 94,101 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
73,593 | 85,742 | 166,394 | 175,499 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
27,381 | 25,807 | 64,259 | 61,551 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
46,212 | 59,935 | 102,135 | 113,948 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
distribution requirements and other
|
206 | 206 | 619 | 619 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO COMMON EQUITY
|
$ | 46,006 | $ | 59,729 | $ | 101,516 | $ | 113,329 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
97
(Page left blank intentionally)
98
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 102,135 | $ | 113,948 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(3,298 | ) | (2,434 | ) | ||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
111,204 | 111,628 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
125,502 | 93,503 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
110,184 | (50,114 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
1,302 | (2,147 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(77,903 | ) | 1,545 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
17,779 | - | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
2,023 | 4,326 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
66 | 7,897 | ||||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(30,266 | ) | (72,002 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(190 | ) | 86,733 | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(19,648 | ) | 239,821 | |||||
Other
|
(77,537 | ) | (26,462 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
261,353 | 506,242 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(140,224 | ) | (206,694 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
4,504 | 4,391 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(31,169 | ) | (21,807 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
52,639 | 21,819 | ||||||
Payment
for purchase of plant
|
- | (56,409 | ) | |||||
Investment
in affiliates
|
160 | (189,400 | ) | |||||
Payment
to storm reserve escrow account
|
- | (85,306 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
42,445 | 41,587 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(50,038 | ) | (51,420 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(33,381 | ) | (15,024 | ) | ||||
Changes
in other investments - net
|
- | 3,934 | ||||||
Other
|
- | (455 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(155,064 | ) | (554,784 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
- | 369,821 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
- | (366,683 | ) | |||||
Changes
in credit borrowing - net
|
- | 100,000 | ||||||
Dividends/distributions
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
equity
|
(22,700 | ) | (37,800 | ) | ||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
(619 | ) | (653 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(288 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(23,607 | ) | 64,668 | |||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
82,682 | 16,126 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
49,303 | 108,036 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 131,985 | $ | 124,162 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 84,971 | $ | 89,947 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 29,337 | $ | 2,324 | ||||
Noncash
financing activities:
|
||||||||
Repayment
by Entergy Texas of assumed long-term debt
|
$ | 70,825 | $ | 148,837 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
99
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 341 | $ | 22,671 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
131,644 | 26,632 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
131,985 | 49,303 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
49,326 | 69,264 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,680 | ) | (1,230 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
142,803 | 179,217 | ||||||
Other
|
34,557 | 60,618 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
56,322 | 50,272 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
281,328 | 358,141 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
9,400 | 50,039 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
32,449 | 33,751 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
105,696 | 104,579 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
13,193 | 17,135 | ||||||
Debt
assumption by Entergy Texas
|
156,425 | 100,509 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
9,788 | 6,381 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
740,264 | 719,838 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliate preferred membership interests
|
189,400 | 189,560 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
341,663 | 303,178 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
125,198 | 120,829 | ||||||
Other
|
11,221 | 13,245 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
667,482 | 626,812 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
6,577,845 | 6,402,668 | ||||||
Natural
gas
|
112,315 | 106,125 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
105,802 | 201,544 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
153,683 | 140,689 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
7,525 | 11,177 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
6,957,170 | 6,862,203 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
3,616,638 | 3,560,458 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
3,340,532 | 3,301,745 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
303,977 | 316,421 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
279,498 | 287,912 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
100,124 | 100,124 | ||||||
Long-term
receivables
|
11,437 | 21,558 | ||||||
Debt
assumption by Entergy Texas
|
542,721 | 669,462 | ||||||
Other
|
12,320 | 13,089 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,250,077 | 1,408,566 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 5,998,355 | $ | 6,056,961 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
100
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 341,565 | $ | 219,470 | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
103,905 | 155,147 | ||||||
Other
|
90,963 | 162,319 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
45,292 | 40,484 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
18,197 | 418 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
32,135 | 30,112 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
92,042 | 91,976 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
24,368 | 24,368 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
7,823 | 7,479 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
- | 20,184 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
45,793 | 67,000 | ||||||
Other
|
12,639 | 9,220 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
814,722 | 828,177 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
1,384,063 | 1,308,449 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
89,093 | 91,634 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
129,315 | 116,321 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
37,437 | 22,007 | ||||||
Decommissioning
and asset retirement cost liabilities
|
237,456 | 222,909 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
13,706 | 13,896 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
183,336 | 188,390 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,635,146 | 1,827,859 | ||||||
Other
|
62,194 | 105,176 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,771,746 | 3,896,641 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
membership interests without sinking fund
|
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Members'
equity
|
1,431,210 | 1,352,408 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(29,323 | ) | (30,265 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
|
1,411,887 | 1,332,143 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 5,998,355 | $ | 6,056,961 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
101
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF MEMBERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,401,909 | $ | 1,328,501 | ||||||||||||
Add:
Net Income
|
46,212 | $ | 46,212 | 59,935 | $ | 59,935 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends/distributions
declared on common equity
|
16,700 | - | ||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
206 | 206 | 206 | 206 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
5 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
16,911 | 216 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,431,210 | $ | 1,388,220 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
LOSS
(Net of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (29,664 | ) | $ | (22,302 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense
|
||||||||||||||||
of
$308 and $959)
|
341 | 341 | (201 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (29,323 | ) | $ | (22,503 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 46,347 | $ | 59,528 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,352,408 | $ | 1,312,701 | ||||||||||||
Add: Net
Income
|
102,135 | $ | 102,135 | 113,948 | $ | 113,948 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Dividends/distributions
declared on common equity
|
22,700 | 37,800 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
619 | 619 | 619 | 619 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
14 | 10 | ||||||||||||||
23,333 | 38,429 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,431,210 | $ | 1,388,220 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
LOSS
(Net of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (30,265 | ) | $ | (22,934 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense
|
||||||||||||||||
of
$1,053 and $1,839)
|
942 | 942 | 431 | 431 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (29,323 | ) | $ | (22,503 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 102,458 | $ | 113,760 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
102
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 122 | $ | 194 | $ | (72 | ) | (37 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
91 | 161 | (70 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
90 | 202 | (112 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
5 | 7 | (2 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
308 | 564 | (256 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
141 | 217 | (76 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
27 | 63 | (36 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
2 | (3 | ) | 5 | 167 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 478 | $ | 841 | $ | (363 | ) | (43 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,751 | 1,608 | 143 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,487 | 1,439 | 48 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
2,049 | 2,256 | (207 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
53 | 55 | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
5,340 | 5,358 | (18 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
1,975 | 1,747 | 228 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
748 | 685 | 63 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
8,063 | 7,790 | 273 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 311 | $ | 440 | $ | (129 | ) | (29 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
276 | 403 | (127 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
297 | 534 | (237 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
14 | 18 | (4 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
898 | 1,395 | (497 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
342 | 465 | (123 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
90 | 157 | (67 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
38 | 25 | 13 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,368 | $ | 2,042 | $ | (674 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
3,933 | 3,831 | 102 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
3,823 | 3,787 | 36 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
5,527 | 6,553 | (1,026 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
159 | 163 | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
13,442 | 14,334 | (892 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
5,688 | 4,425 | 1,263 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
2,152 | 2,020 | 132 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
21,282 | 20,779 | 503 | 2 | ||||||||||||
103
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Hurricane Gustav and
Hurricane Ike
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Gustav and Hurricane Ike" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Hurricane
Gustav (and, to a much lesser extent, Hurricane Ike), which caused catastrophic
damage to Entergy Louisiana's service territory in September
2008. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed their
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike storm cost recovery case with the LPSC in May
2009. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana seeks a determination that $152.6
million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and seeks to replenish its
storm reserve in the amount of $90 million. Entergy Louisiana seeks a
determination that $267.4 million of storm restoration costs are recoverable and
seeks to replenish its storm reserve in the amount of $200
million. The storm restoration costs are net of costs that have
already been paid from previously funded storm reserves. In September
2009, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana made a supplemental
filing to, among other things, recommend recovery of the costs and replenishment
of the storm reserves by Louisiana Act 55 (passed in 2007)
financing. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana
recovered their costs from Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita primarily by Act
55 financing. The parties have agreed to a procedural schedule that
includes March 2010 hearing dates for both the recoverability and the method of
recovery proceedings.
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net income increased $22.7 million
primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher other operation
and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation and amortization
expenses.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net income increased $43.1 million
primarily due to higher other income, higher net revenue, lower other operation
and maintenance expenses, and a lower effective income tax rate, partially
offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses.
Net
Revenue
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges
(credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$263.9
|
|
Volume/weather
|
26.9
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
8.9
|
|
Other
|
(0.3)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$299.4
|
104
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume, including the effects of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike which decreased sales volume in 2008, and the
effect of more favorable weather.
The
retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the price
applied to unbilled sales resulting from a decrease in the price applied to
unbilled sales in 2008 due to the cessation of interim storm recovery and credit
passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost financing and an
interruptible load reserve of $11.2 million recorded in the third quarter 2008
for potential rate refunds. The increase was partially offset by a
formula rate plan provision of $12.9 million recorded in the third quarter 2009
for refunds that will be made to customers in accordance with a settlement
approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial statements for
further discussion of the settlement.
Gross
operating revenue and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $362.9 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due
to lower fuel rates and a decrease of $46.2 million in rider
revenues. The decrease was partially offset by an increase of $26.9
million related to volume/weather, as discussed above.
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power and a decrease in the recovery
from customers of deferred fuel costs.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$741.4
|
|
Volume/weather
|
38.1
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
(29.1)
|
|
Other
|
2.5
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$752.9
|
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales volume, including the effects of
Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Ike which decreased sales volume in 2008, and the
effect of more favorable weather.
The
retail electric price variance is primarily due to:
|
·
|
a
credit passed on to customers as a result of the Act 55 storm cost
financing;
|
|
·
|
a
net decrease in the formula rate plan effective August 2008 to remove
interim storm cost recovery upon the Act 55 financing of storm costs as
well as the storm damage accrual. A portion of the decrease is
offset in other operation and maintenance expenses. See Note 2
to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the
formula rate plan; and
|
|
·
|
a
formula rate plan provision of $12.9 million recorded in the third quarter
2009 for refunds that will be made to customers in accordance with a
settlement approved by the LPSC. See Note 2 to the financial
statements for further discussion of the
settlement.
|
The
decrease was offset by an interruptible load provision of $13.4 million recorded
in the second and third quarters 2008 for potential rate refunds.
105
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Refer to
"MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the Act 55
storm cost financing.
Gross
operating revenue and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $569.9 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due
to lower fuel rates;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $58.9 million in rider revenues;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $35.6 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in
net generation and purchases resulting in less energy available for resale
sales.
|
The
decrease was partially offset by an increase of $38.1 million related to
volume/weather, as discussed above.
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Other
operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of
$4.6 million in nuclear expenses due to higher nuclear labor and contract
costs.
Depreciation
and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in
service.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Other
operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease of $10
million in loss reserves for storm damage in 2009 because of the completion of
the Act 55 storm cost financing and a decrease of $4.5 million in
payroll-related costs. The decrease was partially offset by an
increase of $7.3 million in nuclear expenses due to higher nuclear labor and
contract costs.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other
income increased primarily due to:
·
|
distributions
of $25 million earned on preferred membership interests purchased from
Entergy Holdings Company with the proceeds received from the Act 55 storm
cost financings. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost financing;
and
|
·
|
an
increase in the allowance for equity funds used during construction due to
more construction work in progress throughout
2009.
|
Interest
expense increased primarily due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as
a result of the issuance of $300 million of 6.50% Series first mortgage bonds in
August 2008, partially offset by an increase in the allowance for borrowed funds
used during construction due to more construction work in progress throughout
2009.
106
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 33.5%
for the third quarter 2009 and 30.9% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third
quarter 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35.0% are primarily due to book and tax differences related to
the storm cost financing and allowance for equity funds used during
construction, partially offset by certain book and tax differences related to
utility plant items and state income taxes.
The effective income tax rate was 34.0%
for the third quarter 2008 and 37.7% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is
primarily due to book and tax differences related to utility plant items and
state income taxes, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the
storm cost financing, the allowance for equity funds used during construction,
and the amortization of investment tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$138,918
|
$300
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
278,249
|
926,047
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(294,075)
|
(1,168,734)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(32,687)
|
428,995
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(48,513)
|
186,308
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$90,405
|
$186,608
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow provided by operating
activities decreased $647.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to storm cost
proceeds of $679 million received in 2008 from the LURC as a result of the Act
55 storm cost financings.
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities decreased $874.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due
to:
·
|
the
investment of $545 million in affiliate securities and the investment of
$134.4 million in the storm reserve escrow account in 2008 as a result of
the Act 55 storm cost financings. See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Hurricane
Rita and Hurricane Katrina" and Note 2 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the Act 55 storm cost
financing;
|
·
|
money
pool activity; and
|
·
|
higher
construction expenditures in 2008 due to Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane
Ike.
|
Decreases in Entergy Louisiana's
receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy
Louisiana's receivable from the money pool decreased $30.3 million for
107
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to increasing $106.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The money pool is an
inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries'
need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Entergy
Louisiana's financing activities used $32.7 million of cash for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to providing $429 million of cash for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the issuance of $300 million of
6.50% Series first mortgage bonds in August 2008 and borrowings of $200 million
on Entergy Louisiana's credit facility in 2008, partially offset by the
repurchase in 2008 of $60 million of Auction Rate governmental bonds and an
increase of $20.6 million in common equity distributions paid in
2009.
Decreases in Entergy Louisiana's
payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana's
payable to the money pool decreased by $2.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Capital
Structure
Entergy
Louisiana's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
43.1%
|
43.6%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
1.6%
|
2.5%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
44.7%
|
46.1%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and members'
equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash
equivalents. Entergy Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio
in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information
to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana's financial
condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy
Louisiana's uses and sources of capital. Entergy Louisiana is
developing its capital plan for 2010 through 2012 and currently anticipates
making $1.7 billion in capital investments during that period, including
approximately $444 million for maintenance of existing assets. The
remaining $1.3 billion is associated with specific investments such as
environmental compliance spending, transmission upgrades and system
improvements, and other investments such as potential opportunities through the
Utility's supply plan initiatives that support its ability to meet load growth,
including the Acadia Unit 2 purchase discussed below. Following are
additional updates to the discussion in the Form 10-K.
Entergy
Louisiana's receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as
follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$30,971
|
$61,236
|
$106,427
|
($2,791)
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
As
discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the
amount of $200 million scheduled to expire in August 2012. No
borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of September 30,
2009.
108
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Acadia Unit 2 Purchase
Agreement
In October 2009 Entergy Louisiana
announced that it has signed an agreement to acquire Unit 2 of the Acadia Energy
Center, a 580 MW generating unit located near Eunice, La., from Acadia Power
Partners, LLC, an independent power producer. The Acadia Energy
Center, which entered commercial service in 2002, consists of two combined-cycle
gas-fired generating units, each nominally rated at 580 MW. Entergy
Louisiana proposes to acquire 100 percent of Acadia Unit 2 and a 50 percent
ownership interest in the facility’s common assets. In a
separate transaction entered into earlier this year, Cleco Power is acquiring
Acadia Unit 1 and the other 50 percent interest in the facility’s common
assets. Upon closing the transaction, Cleco Power will serve as
operator for the entire facility. Entergy Louisiana has committed to
sell one third of the output of Unit 2 to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana in
accordance with terms and conditions detailed under the existing Entergy System
Agreement.
Entergy
Louisiana's purchase is contingent upon, among other things, obtaining necessary
approvals, including full cost recovery, from various federal and state
regulatory and permitting agencies. Closing is expected to occur in
late 2010 or early 2011. Entergy Louisiana and Acadia Power Partners
also have entered into a purchased power agreement for 100 percent of the output
of Acadia Unit 2 that will commence on May 1, 2010 and is set to expire at the
closing of the acquisition transaction.
Little Gypsy Repowering
Project
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Louisiana's Little Gypsy repowering project. On March 11,
2009, the LPSC voted in favor of a motion directing Entergy Louisiana to
temporarily suspend the repowering project and, based upon an analysis of the
project's economic viability, to make a recommendation regarding whether to
proceed with the project. This action was based upon a number of
factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices, as well as
environmental concerns, the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in
the capital/financial markets. On
April 1, 2009, Entergy Louisiana complied with the LPSC's directive and
recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of
three years or more. Entergy Louisiana estimated that its total costs
for the project, if suspended, including actual spending to date and estimated
contract cancellation costs, would be approximately $300
million. Entergy Louisiana had obtained all major environmental
permits required to begin construction. A longer-term suspension
places these permits at risk and may adversely affect the project's economics
and technological feasibility. On May 22, 2009, the LPSC issued an
order declaring that Entergy Louisiana's decision to place the Little Gypsy
project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public
interest and prudent. In October 2009, Entergy Louisiana made a
filing with the LPSC seeking permission to cancel the project and seeking
recovery over a five-year period of the project costs. The filing
estimates that Entergy Louisiana's total costs for the project, if canceled,
will be approximately $209 million.
Waterford 3 Steam Generator
Replacement Project
In July 2009 the LPSC granted Entergy
Louisiana's motion to dismiss, without prejudice, its application seeking
recovery of cash earnings on construction work in progress (CWIP) for the steam
generator replacement project, acknowledging Entergy Louisiana's right, at any
time, to seek cash earnings on CWIP if Entergy Louisiana believes that
circumstances or projected circumstances are such that a request for cash
earnings on CWIP is merited. The cash earnings on CWIP application
had been consolidated with a similar request for the Little Gypsy repowering
project that was also dismissed in response to the same motion.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
109
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Income
Taxes
As discussed in Note 10 to the
financial statements, in September 2009, Entergy received a partial agreement
from the IRS for the years 2002 and 2003. When Entergy Louisiana,
Inc. restructured effective December 31, 2005, Entergy Louisiana agreed, under
the terms of the merger plan, to indemnify its parent, Entergy Louisiana
Holdings, Inc. (formerly, Entergy Louisiana, Inc.) for certain tax obligations
that are arising from the above referenced IRS partial
agreement. Because the agreement with the IRS was finalized in the
third quarter 2009, Entergy Louisiana intends to pay Entergy Louisiana Holdings
approximately $300 million pursuant to these intercompany obligations in the
fourth quarter 2009.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Entergy Louisiana's formula rate plan filings with the LPSC for the 2007 and
2006 test years. The LPSC staff and intervenors issued their reports
on Entergy Louisiana's 2007 test year filing in July 2008 and, with minor
exceptions, primarily raised proposed disallowance issues that were previously
raised with regard to Entergy Louisiana's 2006 test year filing and remained at
issue in that proceeding. The 2006 test year included Entergy
Louisiana's request to recover unrecovered fixed costs associated with the loss
of customers that resulted from Hurricane Katrina. In October 2009
the LPSC approved a settlement that resolves the 2007 and 2006 test year
filings. The settlement provides for a new formula rate plan for the
2008, 2009, and 2010 test years. Entergy Louisiana is permitted,
effective with the November 2009 billing cycle, to reset its rates to achieve a
10.25% return on equity for the 2008 test year. 10.25% is the target
midpoint return on equity for the new formula rate plan, with an earnings
bandwidth of +/- 80 basis points (9.45% - 11.05%). The rate reset, a
$20.5 million increase, was implemented for the November 2009 billing
cycle, and the rate reset will be subject to refund pending review of the 2008
test year filing that was made on October 21, 2009. The settlement
does not allow recovery through the formula rate plan of most of Entergy
Louisiana's costs associated with Entergy's stock option
plan. Pursuant to the settlement Entergy Louisiana will refund to its
customers $12.9 million, which includes interest, in the November 2009 billing
cycle.
Federal
Regulation
See "System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in the "Rate,
Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the
discussion in the Form 10-K.
Utility
Restructuring
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Utility
Restructuring" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility
restructuring.
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Industrial
and Commercial Customers" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial
and commercial customers.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Nuclear
Matters" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear
matters.
110
Entergy
Louisiana, LLC
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana's accounting for nuclear
decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other
postretirement benefits.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
111
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 624,829 | $ | 1,021,588 | $ | 1,681,242 | $ | 2,340,109 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
145,265 | 476,050 | 364,832 | 731,324 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
187,243 | 276,996 | 558,379 | 841,845 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
5,364 | 5,196 | 16,433 | 13,921 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
94,397 | 89,936 | 296,208 | 302,345 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
5,391 | 5,021 | 15,888 | 14,796 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
16,890 | 17,801 | 50,605 | 49,049 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
51,465 | 48,354 | 151,481 | 143,324 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(7,105 | ) | 4,634 | 5,109 | 25,561 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
498,910 | 923,988 | 1,458,935 | 2,122,165 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
125,919 | 97,600 | 222,307 | 217,944 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
7,028 | 4,530 | 21,888 | 11,552 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
19,939 | 19,520 | 58,271 | 28,225 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(838 | ) | (947 | ) | (3,036 | ) | (2,886 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
26,129 | 23,103 | 77,123 | 36,891 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
23,354 | 21,046 | 70,262 | 59,378 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
2,446 | 5,065 | 6,651 | 9,251 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(4,528 | ) | (2,772 | ) | (14,120 | ) | (7,077 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
21,272 | 23,339 | 62,793 | 61,552 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
130,776 | 97,364 | 236,637 | 193,283 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
43,807 | 33,139 | 73,141 | 72,919 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
86,969 | 64,225 | 163,496 | 120,364 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
1,738 | 1,738 | 5,213 | 5,213 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
EQUITY
|
$ | 85,231 | $ | 62,487 | $ | 158,283 | $ | 115,151 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
112
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 163,496 | $ | 120,364 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
5,109 | 25,561 | ||||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
167,369 | 158,120 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
(166,221 | ) | 28,473 | |||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
134,842 | (79,325 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
(55,788 | ) | 30,663 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
301,546 | 96,964 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
(13,998 | ) | (230 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
(40,462 | ) | (101,082 | ) | ||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(127,282 | ) | (42,171 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
1,073 | 135,054 | ||||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(86,552 | ) | 599,709 | |||||
Other
|
(4,883 | ) | (46,053 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
278,249 | 926,047 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(342,308 | ) | (400,146 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
21,888 | 11,552 | ||||||
Insurance
proceeds
|
- | 11,317 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
(75,925 | ) | (71,253 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from the sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
75,871 | 70,818 | ||||||
Payment
to storm reserve escrow account
|
- | (134,423 | ) | |||||
Investment
in affiliates
|
160 | (544,994 | ) | |||||
Changes
in other investments - net
|
995 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
40,432 | 15,163 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(45,453 | ) | (20,341 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
30,265 | (106,427 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(294,075 | ) | (1,168,734 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
- | 297,048 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(6,597 | ) | (60,000 | ) | ||||
Change
in money pool payable - net
|
- | (2,791 | ) | |||||
Changes
in credit borrowing, net
|
- | 200,000 | ||||||
Distributions
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
equity
|
(20,600 | ) | - | |||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
(5,213 | ) | (5,213 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(277 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(32,687 | ) | 428,995 | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(48,513 | ) | 186,308 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
138,918 | 300 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 90,405 | $ | 186,608 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid/(received) during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 88,357 | $ | 66,352 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | (31,044 | ) | $ | (5,661 | ) | ||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
113
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 192 | $ | - | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
90,213 | 138,918 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
90,405 | 138,918 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
91,704 | 127,765 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,996 | ) | (1,698 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
101,880 | 244,575 | ||||||
Other
|
9,309 | 11,271 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
83,421 | 67,512 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
284,318 | 449,425 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
9,353 | - | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
19,897 | 66,229 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
133,484 | 128,388 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
7,183 | 19,962 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
3,018 | - | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
14,354 | 10,046 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
562,012 | 812,968 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliate preferred membership interests
|
544,994 | 545,154 | ||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
203,189 | 180,862 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,169 | 1,306 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
- | 9,353 | ||||||
Other
|
810 | 1,805 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
750,162 | 738,480 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
7,093,243 | 6,734,732 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
256,348 | 256,348 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
497,619 | 602,070 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
110,940 | 74,197 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
7,958,150 | 7,667,347 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
3,336,533 | 3,245,701 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
4,621,617 | 4,421,646 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
140,409 | 107,596 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
471,251 | 515,053 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
67,998 | 67,998 | ||||||
Long-term
receivables
|
1,209 | 1,209 | ||||||
Other
|
18,419 | 20,218 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
699,286 | 712,074 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 6,633,077 | $ | 6,685,168 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
114
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 72,326 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
36,885 | 67,465 | ||||||
Other
|
128,461 | 254,055 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
81,708 | 78,401 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
327,239 | 25,693 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
24,282 | 38,280 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
51,101 | 91,563 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
38,362 | 38,362 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
9,262 | 8,935 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
60,006 | 156,000 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
- | 26,668 | ||||||
Other
|
25,230 | 33,841 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
854,862 | 819,263 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
1,764,636 | 1,940,065 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
80,450 | 82,848 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
72,578 | 35,843 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
36,247 | 43,562 | ||||||
Decommissioning
|
292,728 | 276,839 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
20,989 | 19,916 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
284,251 | 282,683 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
1,308,575 | 1,387,473 | ||||||
Other
|
70,987 | 88,838 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
3,931,441 | 4,158,067 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
membership interests without sinking fund
|
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Members'
equity
|
1,769,736 | 1,632,053 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(22,962 | ) | (24,215 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
|
1,846,774 | 1,707,838 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 6,633,077 | $ | 6,685,168 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
115
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF MEMBERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,695,405 | $ | 1,534,173 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
86,969 | $ | 86,969 | 64,225 | $ | 64,225 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Distributions
declared:
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
1,738 | 1,738 | 1,738 | 1,738 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock dividend to parent
|
10,900 | - | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
- | 50 | ||||||||||||||
12,638 | 1,788 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,769,736 | $ | 1,596,610 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
LOSS (Net
of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (23,379 | ) | $ | (27,004 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $348 and
$409)
|
417 | 417 | 482 | 482 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (22,962 | ) | $ | (26,522 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 85,648 | $ | 62,969 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - Beginning of period
|
$ | 1,632,053 | $ | 1,481,509 | ||||||||||||
Add:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
163,496 | $ | 163,496 | 120,364 | $ | 120,364 | ||||||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||||||||||
Distributions
declared:
|
||||||||||||||||
Preferred
membership interests
|
5,213 | 5,213 | 5,213 | 5,213 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock dividend to parent
|
20,600 | - | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
- | 50 | ||||||||||||||
25,813 | 5,263 | |||||||||||||||
Members'
Equity - End of period
|
$ | 1,769,736 | $ | 1,596,610 | ||||||||||||
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
|
||||||||||||||||
LOSS (Net
of Taxes):
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (24,215 | ) | $ | (27,968 | ) | ||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities (net of tax expense of $1,045 and
$1,227)
|
1,253 | 1,253 | 1,446 | 1,446 | ||||||||||||
Balance
at end of period:
|
||||||||||||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
$ | (22,962 | ) | $ | (26,522 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
Income
|
$ | 159,536 | $ | 116,597 | ||||||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
116
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 216 | $ | 365 | $ | (149 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
124 | 218 | (94 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
156 | 333 | (177 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
8 | 16 | (8 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
504 | 932 | (428 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
91 | 104 | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
1 | 2 | (1 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
29 | (16 | ) | 45 | 281 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 625 | $ | 1,022 | $ | (397 | ) | (39 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
2,896 | 2,756 | 140 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,724 | 1,688 | 36 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
3,452 | 3,444 | 8 | - | ||||||||||||
Governmental
|
115 | 118 | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
8,187 | 8,006 | 181 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
523 | 613 | (90 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
17 | 49 | (32 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
8,727 | 8,668 | 59 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 531 | $ | 762 | $ | (231 | ) | (30 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
354 | 500 | (146 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
514 | 797 | (283 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
27 | 38 | (11 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
1,426 | 2,097 | (671 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
169 | 201 | (32 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
4 | 7 | (3 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
82 | 35 | 47 | 134 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,681 | $ | 2,340 | $ | (659 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
6,730 | 6,703 | 27 | - | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
4,435 | 4,431 | 4 | - | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
9,930 | 10,111 | (181 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
341 | 348 | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
21,436 | 21,593 | (157 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
1,262 | 1,723 | (461 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
83 | 102 | (19 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
22,781 | 23,418 | (637 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
117
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net income increased $6.6 million
primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher interest
expense.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net income increased $11 million
primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher depreciation and
amortization expenses, higher interest expense, and lower other
income.
Net
Revenue
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges
(credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$144.4
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
4.1
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
4.0
|
|
Reserve
equalization
|
3.1
|
|
Volume/weather
|
2.4
|
|
Other
|
(1.0)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$157.0
|
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective July 2009, offset by a
decrease in the Attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power
management rider. The formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "State and
Local Rate Regulation" below. The net income effect of the Attala power
plant costs recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on
equity with the remainder offset by Attala power plant costs in other operation
and maintenance expenses, depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income
taxes.
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to a change in a contract with a wholesale customer that increased
its monthly demand charge and an increased net balance on joint account sales as
a result of lower fuel prices in 2009.
The reserve equalization variance is
primarily due to increased reserve equalization revenue as a result of changes
in the Entergy System generation mix compared to the same period in
2008.
118
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on billed and unbilled
sales in 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, offset by a 16% decrease in
electricity usage in the industrial sector.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges (credits)
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $148.3 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due
to lower fuel rates and decreased usage, offset by an increase of $15.1 million
in power management rider revenue.
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to decreases in the average market prices of natural gas
and purchased power.
Other regulatory charges decreased
primarily due to decreased recovery of costs associated with the power
management recovery rider and decreased recovery through the Grand Gulf rider of
Grand Gulf capacity costs due to lower rates and decreased usage. There is no
material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power
management recovery rider and annual adjustments to the Grand Gulf
rider.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net
revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses,
and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other
regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change
in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$385.2
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
13.0
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
5.8
|
|
Reserve
equalization
|
5.1
|
|
Other
|
1.1
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$410.2
|
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to an increase in Attala power plant costs that are recovered
through the power management rider and a formula rate plan increase effective
July 2009. The net income effect of the Attala power plant costs recovery is
limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder
offset by Attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses,
depreciation expenses, and taxes other than income taxes. The formula rate plan
filing is discussed further in "State and
Local Rate Regulation" below.
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to a change in a contract with a wholesale customer that increased
its monthly demand charge and an increased net balance on joint account sales as
a result of lower fuel prices in 2009.
The reserve equalization variance is
primarily due to increased reserve equalization revenue as a result of changes
in the Entergy System generation mix compared to the same period in
2008.
119
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges (credits)
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $164.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower
fuel rates and decreased usage;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $48.5 million in gross wholesale revenues primarily due to a
decrease in volume as a result of less energy available for resale sales;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $12.9 million in power management rider
revenue.
|
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to decreases in the average market prices of natural gas
and purchased power.
Other regulatory charges decreased
primarily due to decreased recovery of costs associated with the power
management recovery rider and decreased recovery through the Grand Gulf Rider of
Grand Gulf capacity costs due to lower rates and decreased usage. There is no
material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power
management recovery rider and annual adjustments to the Grand Gulf
rider.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Interest expense increased primarily
due to the issuance of $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage bonds in June
2009.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service.
Other income decreased primarily due to
the potential buyer's forfeiture of a $1.7 million deposit in June 2008 for an
option to purchase non-utility property, offset by an increase due to the gain
recorded in 2009 on the sale of utility property.
Interest expense increased primarily
due to the issuance of $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage bonds in June
2009.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 37.3%
for the third quarter 2009 and 37.4% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state
income taxes. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is
primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to
utility plant items.
The effective income tax rate was 37.3%
for the third quarter 2008 and 36.7% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state
income taxes.
120
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$1,082
|
$40,582
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
139,757
|
33,828
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(113,028)
|
(87,705)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
41,810
|
15,028
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
68,539
|
(38,849)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$69,621
|
$1,733
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow provided by operating
activities increased $105.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to increased
recovery of deferred fuel costs and a decrease of $7.6 million in pension
contributions.
Investing
Activities
Cash flow used in investing activities
increased $25.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to money pool activity,
offset by decreased construction expenditures related to various fossil and
distribution projects.
Increases in Entergy Mississippi's
receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi's
receivable from the money pool increased by $23.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to decreasing by $21 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. The money pool is an inter-company
borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for
external short-term borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Cash flow
provided by financing activities increased $26.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to the issuance of $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage
bonds in June 2009, offset by money pool activity and an increase of $27.9
million in common stock dividends paid in 2009.
Decreases in Entergy Mississippi's
payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Mississippi's
payable to the money pool decreased by $66 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to increasing $28.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
121
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Capital
Structure
Entergy
Mississippi's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in
the following table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio is due
to the issuance of $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage bonds in June
2009, as discussed below.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
51.4%
|
49.5%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
2.1%
|
0.0%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
53.5%
|
49.5%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock
without sinking fund, and shareholders' equity. Net capital consists
of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Mississippi uses
the net debt to net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and
believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in
evaluating Entergy Mississippi's financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of Entergy Mississippi's uses and sources of
capital. Entergy Mississippi is developing its capital plan for 2010
through 2012 and currently anticipates making $554 million in capital
investments during that period, including approximately $368 million for
maintenance of existing assets. The remaining $186 million is
associated with specific investments such as environmental compliance spending,
transmission upgrades and system improvements. Following are
additional updates to the information presented in the Form 10-K.
Entergy Mississippi's receivables from
or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$23,892
|
($66,044)
|
($28,250)
|
$20,997
|
See Note 4 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
In May and June 2009, Entergy
Mississippi renewed its two separate credit facilities through May 2010. In
August 2009, Entergy Mississippi increased its borrowing capacity with a third
line of credit which will also expire in May 2010, increasing the borrowing
limits to the aggregate amount of $70 million. No borrowings were
outstanding under the credit facilities as of September 30, 2009.
In June 2009, Entergy Mississippi
issued $150 million of 6.64% Series first mortgage bonds due July
2019. Entergy Mississippi used the proceeds to repay outstanding
borrowings on its credit facilities, to repay short-term borrowings under the
Entergy System money pool, and for other general corporate
purposes.
Pension
Contributions
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
122
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula
rate plan and fuel and purchased power cost recovery. Following is an update to
that discussion.
Formula
Rate Plan
On September 18, 2009, Entergy
Mississippi filed proposed modifications to its formula rate plan
rider. The proposed modifications include: (1) resetting Entergy
Mississippi's return on common equity to the middle of the formula rate plan
bandwidth each year and eliminating the 50/50 sharing in the current plan, (2)
replacing the current rate change limit of two percent of revenues subject to a
$14.5 million revenue adjustment cap with a proposed limit of four percent of
revenues, (3) implementing a projected test year for the annual filing and
subsequent look-back for the prior year, and (4) modifying the performance
measurement process.
In March 2009, Entergy Mississippi made
with the MPSC its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test
year. The filing reported a $27.0 million revenue deficiency and an earned
return on common equity of 7.41%. Entergy Mississippi requested a
$14.5 million increase in annual electric revenues, which is the maximum
increase allowed under the terms of the formula rate plan. The MPSC
issued an order on June 30, 2009, finding that Entergy Mississippi's earned
return was sufficiently below the lower bandwidth limit set by the formula rate
plan to require a $14.5 million increase in annual revenues, effective for bills
rendered on or after June 30, 2009.
In March 2008, Entergy Mississippi made
its annual scheduled formula rate plan filing for the 2007 test year with the
MPSC. The filing showed that a $10.1 million increase in annual
electric revenues is warranted. In June 2008, Entergy
Mississippi reached a settlement with the Mississippi Public Utilities Staff
that would result in a $3.8 million rate increase. In January
2009 the MPSC rejected the settlement and left the current rates in
effect. Entergy Mississippi appealed the MPSC's decision to the
Mississippi Supreme Court. After the decision of the MPSC regarding
the formula rate plan filing for the 2008 test year, Entergy Mississippi filed a
motion to dismiss its appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Fuel
and Purchased Power Recovery
In August 2009 the MPSC retained an
independent audit firm to audit Entergy Mississippi's fuel adjustment clause
submittals for the period October 2007 through September 2009. The
audit report is due to the MPSC by December 15, 2009.
Federal
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Federal
Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of "System Agreement
Proceedings," "Transmission," and
"Interconnection
Orders."
Utility
Restructuring
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Utility
Restructuring" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of utility
restructuring.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Mississippi's accounting for unbilled revenue
and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
123
Entergy
Mississippi, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
124
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 356,545 | $ | 491,113 | $ | 908,865 | $ | 1,137,945 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
102,847 | 164,632 | 284,008 | 313,824 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
96,866 | 149,603 | 271,985 | 365,971 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
51,119 | 49,748 | 159,544 | 160,094 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
16,590 | 18,412 | 48,402 | 48,386 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
21,967 | 21,082 | 64,980 | 62,356 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(177 | ) | 32,509 | (57,345 | ) | 72,908 | ||||||||||
TOTAL
|
289,212 | 435,986 | 771,574 | 1,023,539 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
67,333 | 55,127 | 137,291 | 114,406 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
781 | 782 | 2,499 | 2,396 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
257 | 649 | 706 | 1,423 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
300 | (460 | ) | (880 | ) | 483 | ||||||||||
TOTAL
|
1,338 | 971 | 2,325 | 4,302 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
12,939 | 10,404 | 34,399 | 31,149 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
1,094 | 1,723 | 3,314 | 4,168 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(448 | ) | (541 | ) | (1,494 | ) | (1,444 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
13,585 | 11,586 | 36,219 | 33,873 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
55,086 | 44,512 | 103,397 | 84,835 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
20,528 | 16,588 | 38,674 | 31,102 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
34,558 | 27,924 | 64,723 | 53,733 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
707 | 707 | 2,121 | 2,121 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK
|
$ | 33,851 | $ | 27,217 | $ | 62,602 | $ | 51,612 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
125
(Page left blank intentionally)
126
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 64,723 | $ | 53,733 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges (credits) - net
|
(57,345 | ) | 72,908 | |||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
64,980 | 62,356 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
(4,908 | ) | 1,441 | |||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
11,098 | (67,954 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
2,642 | 1,468 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(17,461 | ) | 40,189 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
32,061 | 21,283 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
529 | 2,924 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
65,221 | (134,470 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(25,210 | ) | 26,665 | |||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
4,318 | (10,079 | ) | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(38,116 | ) | 4,955 | |||||
Other
|
37,225 | (41,591 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
139,757 | 33,828 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(91,553 | ) | (110,277 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
2,499 | 2,396 | ||||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(23,892 | ) | 20,997 | |||||
Payment
to storm reserve escrow account
|
(162 | ) | (737 | ) | ||||
Other
|
80 | (84 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(113,028 | ) | (87,705 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
148,475 | 29,499 | ||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
- | (30,000 | ) | |||||
Change
in money pool payable - net
|
(66,044 | ) | 28,250 | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(38,500 | ) | (10,600 | ) | ||||
Preferred
stock
|
(2,121 | ) | (2,121 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow provided by financing activities
|
41,810 | 15,028 | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
68,539 | (38,849 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,082 | 40,582 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 69,621 | $ | 1,733 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 35,576 | $ | 30,869 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | - | $ | 4,209 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
127
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 18 | $ | 1,072 | ||||
Temporary
cash investment
|
69,603 | 10 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
69,621 | 1,082 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
71,176 | 76,503 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(981 | ) | (687 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
40,921 | 29,291 | ||||||
Other
|
9,253 | 11,675 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
44,658 | 35,451 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
165,027 | 152,233 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
7,610 | - | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
- | 5,025 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
2,854 | 19,335 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
6,646 | 9,288 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
30,851 | 31,921 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
1,248 | - | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
6,287 | 6,290 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
290,144 | 225,174 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
5,535 | 5,615 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
4,898 | 5,000 | ||||||
Storm
reserve escrow account
|
31,854 | 31,692 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
- | 7,610 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
42,287 | 49,917 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
3,039,878 | 2,951,636 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
6,773 | 7,806 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
59,737 | 81,959 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
3,106,388 | 3,041,401 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,100,287 | 1,058,426 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
2,006,101 | 1,982,975 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
33,422 | 23,693 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
251,629 | 226,933 | ||||||
Other
|
20,737 | 19,451 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
305,788 | 270,077 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 2,644,320 | $ | 2,528,143 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
128
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
$ | 36,423 | $ | 115,876 | ||||
Other
|
32,594 | 39,623 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
61,646 | 58,517 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
72,957 | 40,896 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
17,642 | 17,113 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
60,196 | - | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
10,239 | 23,000 | ||||||
Gas
hedge contracts
|
- | 15,610 | ||||||
Other
|
5,580 | 5,373 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
297,277 | 316,008 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
560,372 | 571,193 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
7,787 | 8,605 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital lease
|
5,324 | 6,418 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
1,248 | 22,331 | ||||||
Asset
retirement cost liabilities
|
4,997 | 4,784 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
41,275 | 36,957 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
113,467 | 118,223 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
845,285 | 695,330 | ||||||
Other
|
27,548 | 32,656 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,607,303 | 1,496,497 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock without sinking fund
|
50,381 | 50,381 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value, authorized 12,000,000
|
||||||||
shares;
issued and outstanding 8,666,357 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
199,326 | 199,326 | ||||||
Capital
stock expense and other
|
(690 | ) | (690 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
490,723 | 466,621 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
689,359 | 665,257 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 2,644,320 | $ | 2,528,143 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
129
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 159 | $ | 213 | $ | ( 54 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
114 | 161 | (47 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
39 | 64 | (25 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
10 | 14 | (4 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
322 | 452 | (130 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
17 | 19 | (2 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
9 | 14 | (5 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
9 | 6 | 3 | 50 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 357 | $ | 491 | $ | ( 134 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,808 | 1,757 | 51 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,421 | 1,426 | (5 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Industrial
|
599 | 710 | (111 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
118 | 116 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
3,946 | 4,009 | (63 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
69 | 80 | (11 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
115 | 152 | (37 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
4,130 | 4,241 | (111 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 367 | $ | 441 | $ | ( 74 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
302 | 369 | (67 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
111 | 150 | (39 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
28 | 33 | (5 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
808 | 993 | (185 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
32 | 75 | (43 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
23 | 28 | (5 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
46 | 42 | 4 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 909 | $ | 1,138 | $ | ( 229 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
4,186 | 4,203 | (17 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Commercial
|
3,607 | 3,685 | (78 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,625 | 1,953 | (328 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
306 | 311 | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
9,724 | 10,152 | (428 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
154 | 478 | (324 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
268 | 302 | (34 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
10,146 | 10,932 | (786 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
130
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net income increased slightly by $0.2
million primarily due to higher net revenue and a lower effective income tax
rate, substantially offset by lower other income.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net income decreased $5.0 million
primarily due to lower net revenue, lower other income, and higher other
operation and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower interest and other
charges and a lower effective income tax rate.
Net
Revenue
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$67.5
|
|
Effect
of rate case settlement
|
(4.0)
|
|
Volume/weather
|
3.0
|
|
Other
|
2.3
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$68.8
|
The effect of rate case settlement
variance results from the April 2009 settlement of Entergy New Orleans' rate
case, and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the
operation of Grand Gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates
effective June 2009. See Note 2 to the financial statements for
further discussion of the rate case settlement.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to more favorable weather compared to the same period in
2008.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross
operating revenues decreased primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $36.8 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $15.2 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to
a decrease in the average price of the energy available for resale sales;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $11.6 million in gross gas revenues due to decreased fuel
recovery revenue as a result of lower
price.
|
131
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the changes in net revenue
comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$196.5
|
|
Effect
of rate case settlement
|
(7.0)
|
|
Price
applied to unbilled sales
|
(6.4)
|
|
Volume/weather
|
6.1
|
|
Other
|
(1.3)
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$187.9
|
The effect of rate case settlement
variance results from the April 2009 settlement of Entergy New Orleans' rate
case, and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the
operation of Grand Gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates
effective June 2009. See Note 2 to the financial statements for
further discussion of the rate case settlement.
The price applied to unbilled sales
variance results from a decline in natural gas and purchased power
prices.
The volume/weather variance is
primarily due to an increase in electricity usage. Billed retail
electricity usage increased a total of 117 GWh, an increase of
3.4%.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to:
·
|
a
decrease of $69.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to
lower fuel rates;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $68.5 million in affiliated wholesale revenue due to a
decrease in the average price of energy available for resale sales;
and
|
·
|
a
decrease of $31.5 million in gross gas revenues due to decreased fuel
recovery revenue as a result of lower price and lower
usage.
|
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Other
income decreased primarily due to a decrease in interest earned on money pool
investments.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Other
operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to an increase of
$1.2 million in transmission spending for transmission equalization expenses,
substation maintenance, and costs related to the Independent Coordinator of
Transmission.
132
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Other
income decreased primarily due to a decrease in interest earned on money pool
investments.
Interest
and other charges decreased primarily due to a decrease in the interest rate on
notes payable issued to affiliates as part of Entergy New Orleans' plan of
reorganization, as described more fully in Note 18 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 33.6%
for the third quarter 2009 and 37.0% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to
flow-through book and tax timing differences, partially offset by state income
taxes. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is
primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to
utility plant items, partially offset by flow-through book and tax timing
differences.
The effective income tax rate was 40.5%
for the third quarter 2008 and 41.1% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2008 and the nine months ended September 30, 2008 versus the federal
statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax
differences related to utility plant items.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$137,444
|
$92,010
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
78,945
|
63,237
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(44,402)
|
(3,043)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(21,520)
|
(31,531)
|
|||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
13,023
|
28,663
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$150,467
|
$120,673
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash
flow provided by operating activities increased $15.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2008 primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel costs and the timing
of collections of receivables from customers partially offset by the timing of
payments to vendors.
Investing
Activities
Net cash used in investing activities
increased $41.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to insurance proceeds
received in 2008 related to Hurricane Katrina, partially offset by storm
restoration spending in 2008 due to Hurricane Gustav and money pool
activity.
133
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Decreases
in Entergy New Orleans' receivable from the money pool are a source of cash
flow, and Entergy New Orleans' receivable from the money pool decreased by $8.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to increasing by
$21.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The money
pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility
subsidiaries' need for external short-term borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Net cash used in financing activities
decreased $10 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the redemption, at
maturity, of $30 million of 3.875% first mortgage bonds in August 2008,
partially offset by dividends paid on common stock in 2009.
Capital
Structure
Entergy
New Orleans' capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
33.9%
|
37.0%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
19.5%
|
17.1%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
53.4%
|
54.1%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing
portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking
fund, and shareholders' equity. Net capital consists of capital less
cash and cash equivalents. Entergy New Orleans uses the net debt to
net capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides
useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy New
Orleans' financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of Entergy New Orleans' uses and sources of
capital. Entergy New Orleans is developing its capital plan for 2010
through 2012 and currently anticipates making $140 million in capital
investments during that period, including approximately $86 million for
maintenance of existing assets. The remaining $54 million is
associated with specific investments such as plant upgrades, transmission
upgrades and system improvements, and other
investments. Additionally, Entergy New Orleans anticipates investing
approximately $55 million in the continued rebuilding of its gas system damaged
during Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Entergy
New Orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$51,609
|
$60,093
|
$69,013
|
$47,705
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
134
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following are
updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.
Filings
with the City Council
Retail
Rates
As discussed in the Form 10-K, on July
31, 2008, Entergy New Orleans filed an electric and gas base rate case with the
City Council. On April 2, 2009, the City Council approved a
comprehensive settlement. The settlement provides for a net $35.3
million reduction in combined fuel and non-fuel electric revenue requirement,
including conversion of the $10.6 million voluntary recovery credit to a
permanent reduction and complete realignment of Grand Gulf cost recovery from
fuel to electric base rates, and a $4.95 million gas rate increase, both
effective June 1, 2009. A new three-year formula rate plan was also
adopted, with terms including an 11.1% electric return on common equity (ROE)
with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth and a 10.75% gas ROE with a +/- 50 basis
point bandwidth. Earnings outside the bandwidth reset to the midpoint
ROE, with rates changing on a prospective basis depending on whether Entergy New
Orleans is over- or under-earning. The formula rate plan also
includes a recovery mechanism for City Council-approved capacity additions, plus
provisions for extraordinary cost changes and force majeure events.
The rate case settlement also included
$3.1 million per year in electric rates to fund the Energy Smart energy
efficiency programs. On September 17, 2009, the City Council approved
the programs filed by Entergy New Orleans. The rate settlement provides an
incentive for Entergy New Orleans to meet or exceed energy savings targets set
by the City Council and provides a mechanism for Entergy New Orleans to recover
lost contribution to fixed costs associated with the energy savings generated
from the energy efficiency programs. The programs are expected to begin in
2010.
Fuel Adjustment Clause
Litigation
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed by a group of ratepayers in
April 1999 against Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
and Entergy Power in state court in Orleans Parish purportedly on behalf of all
Entergy New Orleans ratepayers, which currently remains pending, and the
corresponding complaint filed with the City Council. In February
2004, the City Council approved a resolution that resulted in a refund to
customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during the months of June
through September 2004. In May 2005 the Civil District Court for
the Parish of Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution, finding no support
for the plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be higher. In
June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the
Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. On February 25, 2008, the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision affirming in part, and
reversing in part, the Civil District Court's decision. Although the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal did not reverse any of the substantive findings
and conclusions of the City Council or the Civil District Court, the Fourth
Circuit found that the amount of the refund was arbitrary and capricious and
increased the amount of the refund to $34.3 million. In April 2009 the
Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision of the Civil District
Court. On April 17, 2009, the plaintiffs requested rehearing by the
Louisiana Supreme Court. On May 29, 2009, the Louisiana Supreme Court
denied the request for rehearing.
135
Entergy
New Orleans, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Federal
Regulation
See
"System Agreement
Proceedings" and "Independent Coordinator of
Transmission" in the "Federal
Regulation" section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's
Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the discussion in the Form
10-K.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy New Orleans' accounting for unbilled revenue
and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.
Unbilled
Revenue
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
New Orleans records an estimate of the revenues earned for energy delivered
since the latest customer billing. Effective June 1, 2009 the fuel
cost component is no longer included in the unbilled revenue calculation at
Entergy New Orleans.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
136
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 158,988 | $ | 189,808 | $ | 404,632 | $ | 524,603 | ||||||||
Natural
gas
|
15,083 | 25,795 | 77,670 | 109,863 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
174,071 | 215,603 | 482,302 | 634,466 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
49,182 | 82,409 | 143,741 | 263,366 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
55,370 | 64,679 | 149,734 | 171,485 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
26,524 | 26,094 | 80,233 | 78,327 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
11,407 | 11,158 | 30,623 | 31,391 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,520 | 8,250 | 25,290 | 24,553 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
766 | 1,028 | 944 | 3,087 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
151,769 | 193,618 | 430,565 | 572,209 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
22,302 | 21,985 | 51,737 | 62,257 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
71 | 109 | 180 | 244 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
697 | 2,743 | 3,714 | 7,589 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(180 | ) | (157 | ) | (701 | ) | (1,173 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
588 | 2,695 | 3,193 | 6,660 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
2,903 | 3,072 | 8,722 | 9,552 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
1,541 | 1,340 | 3,955 | 5,748 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(35 | ) | (71 | ) | (74 | ) | (158 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
4,409 | 4,341 | 12,603 | 15,142 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
18,481 | 20,339 | 42,327 | 53,775 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
6,209 | 8,235 | 15,661 | 22,092 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
12,272 | 12,104 | 26,666 | 31,683 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividend requirements and other
|
241 | 241 | 724 | 724 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS
APPLICABLE TO
|
||||||||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK
|
$ | 12,031 | $ | 11,863 | $ | 25,942 | $ | 30,959 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
137
(Page left blank intentionally)
138
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 26,666 | $ | 31,683 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
944 | 3,087 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
25,290 | 24,553 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
18,847 | 16,021 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
21,904 | (17,154 | ) | |||||
Fuel
inventory
|
4,681 | 998 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(16,069 | ) | 2,820 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
(1,053 | ) | 6,028 | |||||
Interest
accrued
|
(1,500 | ) | (2,798 | ) | ||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
4,819 | (20,295 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(8,341 | ) | 3,615 | |||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
4,995 | 5,229 | ||||||
Changes
in pension liability
|
(2,940 | ) | (4,594 | ) | ||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(3,782 | ) | 15,216 | |||||
Other
|
4,484 | (1,172 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
78,945 | 63,237 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(47,992 | ) | (79,223 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
180 | 244 | ||||||
Insurance
proceeds
|
19 | 102,914 | ||||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
8,485 | (21,308 | ) | |||||
Change
in other investments - net
|
(5,094 | ) | (5,670 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(44,402 | ) | (3,043 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Retirement
of long term debt
|
(728 | ) | (30,774 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(19,700 | ) | - | |||||
Preferred
stock
|
(724 | ) | (724 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(368 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in financing activities
|
(21,520 | ) | (31,531 | ) | ||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
13,023 | 28,663 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
137,444 | 92,010 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 150,467 | $ | 120,673 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid (received) during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 13,697 | $ | 17,545 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | (3,212 | ) | $ | 1,270 | |||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
139
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 139 | $ | 1,119 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
150,328 | 136,325 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
150,467 | 137,444 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
45,831 | 53,934 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,323 | ) | (1,112 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
57,366 | 70,608 | ||||||
Other
|
2,985 | 3,270 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
19,559 | 28,107 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
124,418 | 154,807 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
12,928 | 21,827 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
3,517 | 8,198 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
9,345 | 9,472 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
8,077 | 4,483 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
308,752 | 336,231 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investment
in affiliates - at equity
|
3,259 | 3,259 | ||||||
Non-utility
property at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,016 | 1,016 | ||||||
Other
property and investments
|
7,972 | 2,878 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
12,247 | 7,153 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
787,819 | 767,327 | ||||||
Natural
gas
|
198,287 | 197,231 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
3,588 | 22,314 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
989,694 | 986,872 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
506,954 | 542,499 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
482,740 | 444,373 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
4,080 | - | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
145,802 | 208,524 | ||||||
Other
|
6,683 | 7,254 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
156,565 | 215,778 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 960,304 | $ | 1,003,535 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
140
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 30,000 | $ | - | ||||
Notes
payable to affiliates
|
74,230 | - | ||||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
23,943 | 24,523 | ||||||
Other
|
15,649 | 39,327 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
20,153 | 18,944 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
19,293 | 20,346 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
6,178 | 7,387 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
2,430 | 3,930 | ||||||
Other
|
3,120 | 9,203 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
194,996 | 123,660 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
100,675 | 112,827 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
2,232 | 2,471 | ||||||
Regulatory
liability for income taxes - net
|
60,321 | 72,046 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
44,902 | 12,040 | ||||||
Retirement
cost liability
|
3,121 | 2,966 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
15,604 | 10,609 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
46,382 | 49,322 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
168,021 | 272,973 | ||||||
Gas
system rebuild insurance proceeds
|
81,227 | 98,418 | ||||||
Other
|
5,375 | 14,997 | ||||||
TOTAL
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
527,860 | 648,669 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock without sinking fund
|
19,780 | 19,780 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $4 par value, authorized 10,000,000
|
||||||||
shares;
issued and outstanding 8,435,900 shares in 2009
|
||||||||
and
2008
|
33,744 | 33,744 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
36,294 | 36,294 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
147,630 | 141,388 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
217,668 | 211,426 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 960,304 | $ | 1,003,535 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
141
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 63 | $ | 61 | $ | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
Commercial
|
51 | 59 | (8 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
11 | 15 | (4 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
21 | 24 | (3 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
146 | 159 | (13 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
13 | 28 | (15 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
- | 1 | (1 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
- | 2 | (2 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 159 | $ | 190 | $ | ( 31 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
549 | 469 | 80 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
525 | 506 | 19 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
148 | 148 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Governmental
|
228 | 216 | 12 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
1,450 | 1,339 | 111 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
241 | 233 | 8 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
2 | 6 | (4 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
1,693 | 1,578 | 115 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 129 | $ | 132 | $ | ( 3 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
126 | 147 | (21 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
28 | 36 | (8 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
52 | 59 | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
335 | 374 | (39 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
64 | 133 | (69 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
- | 1 | (1 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
6 | 17 | (11 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 405 | $ | 525 | (120 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,219 | 1,098 | 121 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,370 | 1,366 | 4 | - | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
395 | 418 | (23 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
600 | 585 | 15 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
3,584 | 3,467 | 117 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
1,106 | 1,037 | 69 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
11 | 16 | (5 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
4,701 | 4,520 | 181 | 4 | ||||||||||||
142
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Hurricane Ike and Hurricane
Gustav
See the Form 10-K for a discussion of
Hurricane Ike, which caused catastrophic damage to Entergy Texas' service
territory in September 2008. In April 2009 a law was enacted in Texas
that authorizes recovery of these types of costs by
securitization. Entergy Texas filed its storm cost recovery case with
the PUCT in April 2009 seeking a determination that $577.5 million of Hurricane
Ike and Hurricane Gustav restoration costs are recoverable, including estimated
costs for work to be completed. On August 5, 2009, Entergy Texas
submitted to the ALJ an unopposed settlement agreement to resolve all issues in
the storm cost recovery case. Under the terms of the agreement $566.4
million, plus carrying costs, are eligible for recovery. Insurance
proceeds will be credited as an offset to the securitized amount. Of
the $11.1 million difference between Entergy Texas' request and the amount
agreed to, which is part of the black box agreement and not directly
attributable to any specific individual issues raised, $6.8 million is
operation and maintenance expense for which Entergy Texas recorded a charge in
the second quarter 2009. The remaining $4.3 million was recorded as
utility plant. The PUCT approved the settlement in August 2009, and
in September 2009 the PUCT approved recovery of the costs, plus carrying costs,
by securitization.
In the third quarter 2009, Entergy
settled with its insurer on its Hurricane Ike claim and Entergy Texas received
$75.5 million in proceeds (Entergy received a total of $76.5
million).
In November 2009, Entergy Texas
Restoration Funding, LLC (Entergy Texas Restoration Funding), a company
wholly-owned and consolidated by Entergy Texas, issued $545.9 million of senior
secured transition bonds (securitization bonds). With the proceeds,
Entergy Texas Restoration Funding purchased from Entergy Texas the transition
property, which is the right to recover from customers through a transition
charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization
bonds. Entergy Texas expects use the proceeds to reduce
debt. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional
information regarding the securitization bonds.
Results of
Operations
Net
Income
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net income increased by $15.3 million
primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income, partially offset by
higher other operation and maintenance expenses and higher interest and other
charges.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net income decreased slightly by $2.4
million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses and
higher interest and other charges, substantially offset by higher net revenue
and higher other income.
Net
Revenue
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the third quarter 2009 to the third quarter 2008.
143
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$116.4
|
|
Volume/weather
|
19.0
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
8.2
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
6.7
|
|
Other
|
2.9
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$153.2
|
The
volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales
volume, including the effects of Hurricane Ike which decreased sales volume in
2008, and the effect of more favorable weather during the billed sales
period.
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to increased volume to municipal and co-op customers.
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to rate increases effective late-January 2009. See Note
2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate
increases.
Gross
operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $175.3 million in fuel cost recovery revenues
primarily attributable to lower fuel rates and interim fuel refunds to customers
for fuel cost recovery over-collections through March 2009, and a decrease in
affiliated wholesale revenue of $32.7 million due to a decrease in the average
price of energy available for resale sale. The refund was distributed
over a three-month period beginning July 2009. The interim fuel
refund and the PUCT approval is discussed in Note 2 to the financial
statements.
Fuel and purchased power expenses
decreased primarily due to decreases in the average market prices of natural gas
and purchased power.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Net revenue consists of operating
revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale,
2) purchased power expenses and 3) other regulatory
charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue
comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Amount
|
||
(In
Millions)
|
||
2008
net revenue
|
$334.3
|
|
Volume/weather
|
18.6
|
|
Retail
electric price
|
17.6
|
|
Net
wholesale revenue
|
10.5
|
|
Rough
production cost equalization
|
(18.6)
|
|
Reserve
equalization
|
(7.7)
|
|
Other
|
6.2
|
|
2009
net revenue
|
$360.9
|
The
volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in unbilled sales
volume, including the effects of Hurricane Ike which decreased sales volume in
2008.
The retail electric price variance is
primarily due to rate increases effective late-January 2009. See Note
2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate
increases.
144
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
The net wholesale revenue variance is
primarily due to increased volume to municipal and co-op customers.
As discussed further in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the rough production cost equalization variance is due to
an additional $18.6 million allocation of 2007 rough production cost
equalization receipts ordered by the PUCT to Texas retail customers over what
was originally allocated to Entergy Texas prior to the jurisdictional separation
of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. into Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy
Texas, effective December 2007.
The reserve equalization variance is
primarily due to increased reserve equalization expense related to changes in
the Entergy System generation mix compared to the same period in
2008.
Gross
operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory
charges
Gross operating revenues decreased
primarily due to a decrease of $227.3 million in fuel cost recovery revenues
primarily attributable to lower fuel rates and a decrease in affiliated
wholesale revenue of $156.6 million due to a decrease in the average price of
energy available for resale sales.
Fuel and
purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to decreases in the average
market prices of natural gas and purchased power, partially offset by an
increase in deferred fuel expense due to fuel and purchased power expense
decreases in excess of lower fuel cost recovery revenues.
Other regulatory charges increased
primarily due to rough production cost equalization charges as described
above.
Other
Income Statement Variances
Third Quarter 2009 Compared
to Third Quarter 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $3.4 million in fossil
expenses primarily due to higher plant maintenance costs and plant outages and
an increase of $2.9 million in transmission spending for transmission
equalization expenses and costs related to the Independent Coordinator of
Transmission.
Other income increased primarily due to
carrying charges on Hurricane Ike storm restoration costs as authorized by Texas
legislation in the second quarter 2009, partially offset by a decrease in taxes
collected on advances for transmission projects which is offset in income tax
expense. See Note 2 to the financial statements for further
discussion of Hurricane Ike storm cost recovery filings.
Interest expense increased primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as a result of the issuance of
$500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds in January 2009 and the issuance of
$150 million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds in May 2009.
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Other operation and maintenance
expenses increased primarily due to:
·
|
an
increase of $7.6 million in fossil expenses primarily due to higher plant
maintenance costs and plant
outages;
|
·
|
an
increase of $6.8 million due to the Hurricane Ike and Hurricane Gustav
storm cost recovery settlement agreement, as discussed above under Hurricane
Ike and Hurricane Gustav;
|
·
|
an
increase of $4.6 million in transmission spending for transmission
equalization expenses and costs related to the Independent Coordinator of
Transmission;
|
·
|
an
increase of $2.0 million in customer service costs primarily as a result
of write-offs of uncollectible customer
accounts;
|
145
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
·
|
an
increase of $1.8 million in legal spending due to increased litigation and
legal fees; and
|
·
|
an
increase of $1.6 million in local easement fees as the result of higher
gross revenues in certain locations within the Texas
jurisdiction.
|
Other
income increased primarily due to carrying charges on Hurricane Ike storm
restoration costs as authorized by Texas legislation in the second quarter 2009,
partially offset by a decrease in taxes collected on advances for transmission
projects and a decrease in interest earned on money pool
investments. See Note 2 to the financial statements for further
discussion of Hurricane Ike storm cost recovery filings.
Interest and other charges increased
primarily due to an increase in long-term debt outstanding as a result of the
issuance of $500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds in January 2009 and the
issuance of $150 million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds in May 2009, and higher
interest on deferred fuel costs.
Income
Taxes
The effective income tax rate was 35.6%
for the third quarter 2009 and 38.6% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is
primarily due to state income taxes and book and tax differences related to
utility plant items, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the
allowance for equity funds used during construction and the amortization of
investment tax credits.
The effective income tax rate was 37.5%
for the third quarter 2008 and 37.4% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third
quarter 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state
income taxes. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is
primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by the amortization of
investment tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$2,239
|
$297,082
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
46,255
|
26,804
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(156,231)
|
(50,648)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
243,169
|
(221,521)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
133,193
|
(245,365)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$135,432
|
$51,717
|
Operating
Activities
Cash flow provided by operating
activities increased $19.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to increased
recovery of deferred fuel costs, the timing of collection of receivables from
customers, and a decrease of $16.6 million in pension contributions,
substantially offset by Hurricane Ike restoration spending. The
increased fuel recovery was primarily caused by the $71 million fuel cost
over-recovery refund in 2008 that is discussed in Note 2 to the financial
statements in the Form 10-K, in addition to the over-recovery of fuel costs in
2009 compared to 2008.
146
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Investing
Activities
Net cash flow used in investing
activities increased $105.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to money pool
activity, partially offset by higher construction expenditures in 2008 due to
Hurricane Ike and insurance proceeds received in 2009 relating to Hurricane
Ike. Increases in Entergy Texas' receivable from the money pool are a
use of cash flow, and Entergy Texas' receivable from the money pool increased by
$46.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
decreasing by $124.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement
designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for external short-term
borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Financing activities provided cash of
$243.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to using
cash of $221.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily
due to:
·
|
the
issuance of $500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds in January
2009;
|
·
|
the
issuance of $150 million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds in May
2009;
|
·
|
$150
million of capital returned to Entergy Corporation in February 2008 as
discussed in the Form 10-K; and
|
·
|
the
retirement of $80 million of long-term debt in 2009 compared to $159.2
million in 2008.
|
The cash
provided was partially offset by:
·
|
the
repayment of $100 million outstanding on Entergy Texas' credit facility in
February 2009 as compared to borrowings of $100 million on Entergy Texas'
credit facility in 2008;
|
·
|
the
repayment of Entergy Texas' $160 million note payable from Entergy
Corporation in January 2009; and
|
·
|
money
pool activity.
|
Decreases
in Entergy Texas' payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy
Texas' payable to the money pool decreased by $50.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
Capital
Structure
Entergy Texas' capitalization is
balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following
table. The increase in the debt to capital ratio for Entergy Texas as
of September 30, 2009 is primarily due to the issuance of $500 million 7.125%
Series Mortgage Bonds in January 2009 and the issuance of $150 million 7.875%
Series Mortgage Bonds in May 2009, partially offset by the repayment of Entergy
Texas' $160 million note payable from Entergy Corporation in January 2009, the
repayment of $100 million outstanding on Entergy Texas' credit facility in
February 2009, and the retirement of $80 million of long-term debt prior to
maturity.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
61.6
%
|
59.9%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
2.0%
|
0.0%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
63.6%
|
59.9%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion and
also including the debt assumption liability. Capital consists of
debt and shareholder's equity. Net capital consists of capital less
cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Texas uses the net debt to net
capital ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides
useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Texas'
financial condition.
147
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy
Texas' uses and sources of capital. Entergy Texas is developing its
capital plan for 2010 through 2012 and currently anticipates making $620 million
in capital investments during that period, including approximately $323 million
for maintenance of existing assets. The remaining $297 million is
associated with specific investments such as environmental compliance spending,
plant upgrades, transmission upgrades and system improvements, and other
investments. Following are additional updates to the information
provided in the Form 10-K.
Entergy
Texas' receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as
follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$46,412
|
($50,794)
|
$29,416
|
$154,176
|
See Note 4 to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
Texas has a credit facility in the amount of $100 million scheduled to expire in
August 2012. No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of
September 30, 2009.
In December 2008, Entergy Texas
borrowed $160 million from its parent company, Entergy Corporation, under a $300
million revolving credit facility pursuant to an Inter-Company Credit Agreement
between Entergy Corporation and Entergy Texas. This borrowing would
have matured on December 3, 2013. Entergy Texas used the proceeds,
together with other available corporate funds, to pay at maturity the portion of
the $350 million Floating Rate series of first mortgage bonds due December 2008
that had been assumed by Entergy Texas, and that bond series is no longer
outstanding. In January 2009, Entergy Texas repaid its $160 million
note payable to Entergy Corporation with the proceeds from the bond issuance
discussed below.
In January 2009, Entergy Texas issued
$500 million of 7.125% Series Mortgage Bonds due February 2019. Entergy Texas
used a portion of the proceeds to repay its $160 million note payable to Entergy
Corporation, to repay the $100 million outstanding on its credit facility, to
repay short-term borrowings under the Entergy System money pool, and to repay
prior to maturity Entergy Texas' obligations related to the following debt
series pursuant to the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana:
Governmental
Bonds share assumed under debt assumption agreement:
|
Amount
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
||
6.75%
Series due 2012, Calcasieu Parish
|
$22,115
|
|
6.7%
Series due 2013, Point Coupee Parish
|
$7,990
|
|
7.0%
Series due 2015, West Feliciana Parish
|
$22,400
|
|
6.6%
Series due 2028, West Feliciana Parish
|
$18,320
|
Entergy
Texas used the remaining proceeds for other general corporate
purposes.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas issued $150
million of 7.875% Series Mortgage Bonds due June 2039. Entergy Texas
intends to use the proceeds to repay on or prior to maturity Entergy Texas'
obligation related to the $100,509,000 of Floating Rate Series Mortgage Bonds
due December 2009 pursuant to the debt assumption agreement with Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana and for other general corporate purposes. A portion
of the net proceeds were used to repay borrowings from the Entergy System money
pool and invested in temporary cash investments and the Entergy System money
pool.
148
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Pension
Contributions
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Transition to Retail
Competition in Texas
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Transition
to Retail Competition in Texas" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of
electric restructuring activity that involves Entergy Texas. In June
2009, a law was enacted in Texas that requires Entergy Texas to cease all
activities relating to Entergy Texas' transition to competition. The
law allows Entergy Texas to remain a part of the SERC Region, although it does
not prevent Entergy Texas from joining the Southwest Power Pool. The
law provides that any further proceedings to certify a power region that Entergy
Texas belongs to as a qualified power region can be initiated by the PUCT, or on
motion by another party, when the conditions supporting such a proceeding
exist. Under the new law, the PUCT may not approve a transition to
competition plan for Entergy Texas until the expiration of four years from the
PUCT's certification of Entergy Texas' power region. In response to
the new law, Entergy Texas in June 2009 gave notice to the PUCT of the
withdrawal of its transition to competition plan, and requested that its
transition to competition proceeding be dismissed. In July 2009 the
ALJ dismissed the proceeding.
The new law also contains provisions
that allow Entergy Texas to be included in a cost recovery mechanism that
permits annual filings for the recovery of reasonable and necessary expenditures
for transmission infrastructure improvement and changes in wholesale
transmission charges. This mechanism was previously available to
other non-ERCOT Texas utility companies, but not to Entergy Texas.
The new law further amends already
existing law that had required Entergy Texas to propose for PUCT approval a
tariff to allow eligible customers the ability to contract for competitive
generation. The amending language in the new law provides, among
other things, that: 1) the tariff shall not be implemented in a
manner that harms the sustainability or competitiveness of manufacturers who
choose not to participate in the tariff; 2) Entergy Texas shall "purchase
competitive generation service, selected by the customer, and provide the
generation at retail to the customer" and 3) Entergy Texas shall
provide and price transmission service and ancillary services under that tariff
at a rate that is unbundled from its cost of service. The new law
directs that the PUCT may not issue an order on the tariff that is contrary to
an applicable decision, rule, or policy statement of a federal regulatory agency
having jurisdiction. Entergy Texas has thus far not made a filing
with the PUCT in response to the newly adopted law addressing the
tariff. The new law provides that the PUCT shall approve, reject, or
modify the proposed tariff not later than September 1, 2010.
State and Local Rate
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - State and
Local Rate Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and
local rate regulation. Following are updates to that
discussion.
PUCT
Proceedings
In January 2008, Entergy Texas made a
compliance filing with the PUCT describing how its 2007 Rough Production Cost
Equalization receipts under the System Agreement were allocated between Entergy
Gulf States, Inc.'s Texas and Louisiana jurisdictions. A hearing was
held at the end of July 2008, and in October 2008 the ALJ issued a proposal for
decision recommending an additional $18.6 million allocation to Texas retail
customers. The PUCT adopted the ALJ's proposal for decision in
December 2008. Because the PUCT allocation to Texas retail customers
is inconsistent with the LPSC allocation to Louisiana retail customers, the
PUCT's decision would result in trapped costs between the Texas and
149
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Louisiana
jurisdictions with no mechanism for recovery. The PUCT denied Entergy
Texas' motion for rehearing and Entergy Texas commenced proceedings in both
state and federal district courts seeking to reverse the PUCT's
decision. On May 12, 2009, certain defendants, in their official
capacities as Commissioners of the PUCT, filed a motion to dismiss Entergy
Texas' pending complaint before the U.S. District Court for the Western District
of Texas. The federal proceeding, including a ruling on the motion to
dismiss, has been abated pending further action by the FERC in the proceeding
discussed below.
Entergy Texas also filed with the FERC
a proposed amendment to the System Agreement bandwidth formula to specifically
calculate the payments to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas of
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.'s rough production cost equalization receipts for
2007. On May 8, 2009, the FERC issued an order rejecting the proposed
amendment, stating, among other things, that the FERC does not have jurisdiction
over the allocation of an individual utility's receipts/payments among or
between its retail jurisdictions and that this was a matter for the courts to
review in the pending proceedings noted above. Because of the FERC's
order, Entergy Texas recorded the effects of the PUCT's allocation of the
additional $18.6 million to retail customers in the second quarter
2009. On an after-tax basis, the charge to earnings was approximately
$13.0 million (including interest). Entergy requested rehearing of
the FERC's order, and on July 8, 2009, the FERC granted the request for
rehearing for the limited purpose of affording more time for consideration of
Entergy's request.
In May 2009, Entergy Texas filed with
the PUCT a request to refund $46.1 million, including interest, of fuel cost
recovery over-collections through February 2009. Entergy Texas
requested that the proposed refund be made over a four-month period beginning
June 2009. Pursuant to a stipulation among the various parties, in
June 2009 the PUCT issued an order approving a refund of $59.2 million,
including interest, of fuel cost recovery overcollections through March
2009. The refund was made over a three-month period beginning July
2009.
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
Texas made a rate filing in September 2007 with the PUCT requesting an annual
rate increase totaling $107.5 million, including a base rate increase of $64.3
million and riders totaling $43.2 million. On December 16, 2008,
Entergy Texas filed a term sheet that reflected a settlement agreement that
included the PUCT Staff and the other active participants in the rate
case. On December 19, 2008, the ALJs approved Entergy Texas' request
to implement interim rates reflecting the agreement. The agreement
includes a $46.7 million base rate increase, among other
provisions. Under the ALJs' interim order, Entergy Texas implemented
interim rates, subject to refund and surcharge, reflecting the rates established
through the settlement. These rates became effective with bills
rendered on and after January 28, 2009, for usage on and after December 19,
2008. In addition, the existing recovery mechanism for incremental
purchased power capacity costs ceased as of January 28, 2009, with purchased
power capacity costs then subsumed within the base rates set in this
proceeding. Certain Texas municipalities exercised their original
jurisdiction and took final action to approve rates consistent with the interim
rates approved by the ALJs. In March 2009, the PUCT approved the
settlement, which made the interim rates final, and this PUCT decision is now
final and non-appealable.
In September 2009, Entergy Texas filed
with the PUCT a request for a good cause exception to implement a power cost
recovery factor to collect approximately $26 million annually associated with a
new purchased power contract with Entergy Arkansas that takes effect January 1,
2010. Entergy Texas proposes that the power cost recovery factor be
approved beginning January 2010 and remain in place until the contract expires
or new rates that include the cost of the contract are set after a general rate
case, whichever is earlier. This matter is pending before the PUCT,
and a procedural schedule has not been set. The ALJ suspended the
effective date of the factor until March 22, 2010.
In October 2009, Entergy Texas filed
with the PUCT a request to refund approximately $71 million, including interest,
of fuel cost recovery over-collections through September
2009. Entergy Texas requested that the proposed refund be made over a
six-month period beginning January 2010. The matter is pending before
the PUCT, and a procedural schedule has not been set.
Entergy Texas plans to file a general
rate case by the end of 2009.
150
Entergy
Texas, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Federal
Regulation
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Federal
Regulation" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of "System Agreement
Proceedings," "Transmission," and
"Interconnection
Orders."
Industrial and Commercial
Customers
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Industrial
and Commercial Customers" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of industrial
and commercial customers.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Environmental
Risks" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental
risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in Entergy Texas' accounting for the application of
regulatory accounting principles, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and
other postretirement benefits.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the "Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries' Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
151
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 399,496 | $ | 621,321 | $ | 1,190,289 | $ | 1,583,698 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
77,529 | 207,949 | 347,405 | 435,131 | ||||||||||||
Purchased
power
|
159,088 | 289,157 | 438,505 | 794,750 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
44,735 | 34,517 | 150,320 | 119,192 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
49 | 46 | 145 | 137 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
14,356 | 14,006 | 42,298 | 40,550 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
19,721 | 19,057 | 56,924 | 56,294 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
9,691 | 7,826 | 43,478 | 19,523 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
325,169 | 572,558 | 1,079,075 | 1,465,577 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
74,327 | 48,763 | 111,214 | 118,121 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
1,042 | 563 | 4,561 | 1,541 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
11,956 | 2,127 | 40,404 | 7,680 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(658 | ) | 3,968 | 336 | 15,068 | |||||||||||
TOTAL
|
12,340 | 6,658 | 45,301 | 24,289 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
25,854 | 17,280 | 71,801 | 55,787 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
2,045 | 1,771 | 6,104 | 4,346 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(482 | ) | (318 | ) | (2,201 | ) | (875 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
27,417 | 18,733 | 75,704 | 59,258 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
59,250 | 36,688 | 80,811 | 83,152 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
21,069 | 13,772 | 31,155 | 31,108 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 38,181 | $ | 22,916 | $ | 49,656 | $ | 52,044 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
152
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 49,656 | $ | 52,044 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Reserve
for regulatory adjustments
|
- | 285 | ||||||
Other
regulatory charges - net
|
43,478 | 19,523 | ||||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
57,069 | 56,431 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
6,844 | 42,073 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
182,852 | 35,134 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory
|
(1,852 | ) | (227 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
(113,033 | ) | 85,084 | |||||
Taxes
accrued
|
(49,595 | ) | (15,657 | ) | ||||
Interest
accrued
|
8,831 | (1,246 | ) | |||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
93,449 | (151,922 | ) | |||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
(97,392 | ) | (26,404 | ) | ||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(4,004 | ) | 2,072 | |||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(167,389 | ) | 76,315 | |||||
Other
|
37,341 | (146,701 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
46,255 | 26,804 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(138,916 | ) | (176,218 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
4,561 | 1,541 | ||||||
Insurance
proceeds
|
32,895 | 1,420 | ||||||
Change
in money pool receivable - net
|
(46,412 | ) | 124,760 | |||||
Changes
in transition charge account
|
(8,359 | ) | (2,151 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(156,231 | ) | (50,648 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from the issuance of long-term debt
|
637,341 | - | ||||||
Return
of capital to parent
|
- | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(79,978 | ) | (159,232 | ) | ||||
Changes
in money pool payable - net
|
(50,794 | ) | - | |||||
Repayment
of loan from Entergy Corporation
|
(160,000 | ) | - | |||||
Changes
in credit borrowings - net
|
(100,000 | ) | 100,000 | |||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(3,400 | ) | (12,000 | ) | ||||
Other
|
- | (289 | ) | |||||
Net
cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
|
243,169 | (221,521 | ) | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
133,193 | (245,365 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,239 | 297,082 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 135,432 | $ | 51,717 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 66,330 | $ | 58,645 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 6,000 | $ | 7,293 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
153
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 204 | $ | 2,201 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
135,228 | 38 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
135,432 | 2,239 | ||||||
Securitization
recovery trust account
|
20,421 | 12,062 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Customer
|
49,798 | 82,583 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(977 | ) | (1,001 | ) | ||||
Associated
companies
|
154,579 | 258,629 | ||||||
Other
|
8,679 | 14,122 | ||||||
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
36,076 | 30,262 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
248,155 | 384,595 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
- | 21,179 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
67,653 | 88,611 | ||||||
Fuel
inventory - at average cost
|
59,497 | 57,645 | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
31,066 | 36,329 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
38,297 | 12,785 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
600,521 | 615,445 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Investments
in affiliates - at equity
|
830 | 845 | ||||||
Non-utility
property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)
|
1,569 | 1,788 | ||||||
Other
|
16,130 | 17,451 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
18,529 | 20,084 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
3,120,338 | 2,912,972 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
87,284 | 221,387 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
3,207,622 | 3,134,359 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,131,705 | 1,104,116 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
2,075,917 | 2,030,243 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
87,178 | 84,997 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
1,076,436 | 1,117,257 | ||||||
Long-term
receivables
|
559 | 559 | ||||||
Other
|
55,539 | 116,186 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
1,219,712 | 1,318,999 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 3,914,679 | $ | 3,984,771 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
154
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing portion of debt assumption liability
|
$ | 156,425 | $ | 100,509 | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
55,081 | 144,662 | ||||||
Other
|
57,835 | 342,449 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
40,174 | 40,589 | ||||||
Taxes
accrued
|
- | 49,595 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
30,933 | 22,102 | ||||||
Deferred
fuel costs
|
72,270 | - | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
1,269 | 1,269 | ||||||
System
agreement cost equalization
|
139,820 | 214,315 | ||||||
Other
|
- | 4,551 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
553,807 | 920,041 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
745,858 | 756,996 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
22,931 | 24,128 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
20,257 | - | ||||||
Asset
retirement cost liabilities
|
3,395 | 3,250 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
8,932 | 12,936 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
81,487 | 91,316 | ||||||
Note
payable to Entergy Corporation
|
- | 160,000 | ||||||
Long-term
debt - assumption liability
|
542,721 | 669,462 | ||||||
Other
long-term debt
|
952,352 | 414,906 | ||||||
Other
|
36,534 | 31,587 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
2,414,467 | 2,164,581 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value, authorized 200,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding 46,525,000 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
49,452 | 49,452 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
481,994 | 481,994 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
414,959 | 368,703 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
946,405 | 900,149 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
$ | 3,914,679 | $ | 3,984,771 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
155
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIAIRES
|
||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF RETAINED EARNINGS AND PAID-IN CAPITAL
|
||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 379,478 | $ | 339,936 | ||||
Add:
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
38,181 | 22,916 | ||||||
38,181 | 22,916 | |||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
2,700 | - | ||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 414,959 | $ | 362,852 | ||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 481,994 | ||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Return
of capital to parent
|
- | - | ||||||
Paid-in
capital - End of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 481,994 | ||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
||||||||
Retained
Earnings - Beginning of period
|
$ | 368,703 | $ | 322,808 | ||||
Add:
|
||||||||
Net
Income
|
49,656 | 52,044 | ||||||
49,656 | 52,044 | |||||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock
|
3,400 | 12,000 | ||||||
Retained
Earnings - End of period
|
$ | 414,959 | $ | 362,852 | ||||
PAID-IN
CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Paid-in
Capital - Beginning of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 631,994 | ||||
Deduct:
|
||||||||
Return
of capital to parent
|
- | (150,000 | ) | |||||
Paid-in
capital - End of period
|
$ | 481,994 | $ | 481,994 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||
156
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
SELECTED
OPERATING RESULTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 157 | $ | 212 | $ | (55 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
70 | 125 | (55 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
58 | 145 | (87 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
4 | 7 | (3 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
289 | 489 | (200 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
106 | 139 | (33 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
4 | 2 | 2 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
- | (9 | ) | 9 | 100 | |||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 399 | $ | 621 | $ | (222 | ) | (36 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
1,902 | 1,727 | 175 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
1,228 | 1,180 | 48 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Industrial
|
1,482 | 1,575 | (93 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
73 | 66 | 7 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
4,685 | 4,548 | 137 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
1,198 | 1,130 | 68 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
93 | 23 | 70 | 304 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
5,976 | 5,701 | 275 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
Increase/
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
2009 | 2008 |
(Decrease)
|
%
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
In Millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
Operating Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 416 | $ | 472 | $ | (56 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||
Commercial
|
254 | 313 | (59 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Industrial
|
249 | 383 | (134 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
16 | 20 | (4 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
retail
|
935 | 1,188 | (253 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
221 | 377 | (156 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
6 | 7 | (1 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
28 | 12 | 16 | 133 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,190 | $ | 1,584 | $ | (394 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||
Billed
Electric Energy
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
(GWh):
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
4,243 | 4,171 | 72 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
|
3,150 | 3,165 | (15 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Industrial
|
4,191 | 4,726 | (535 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Governmental
|
194 | 189 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total
retail
|
11,778 | 12,251 | (473 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Sales
for resale
|
||||||||||||||||
Associated
companies
|
3,041 | 3,105 | (64 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-associated
companies
|
134 | 73 | 61 | 84 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
14,953 | 15,429 | (476 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
157
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S
FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Results of
Operations
System
Energy's principal asset consists of a 90% ownership and leasehold interest in
Grand Gulf. The capacity and energy from its 90% interest is sold
under the Unit Power Sales Agreement to its only four customers, Entergy
Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy New
Orleans. System Energy's operating revenues are derived from the
allocation of the capacity, energy, and related costs associated with its 90%
interest in Grand Gulf pursuant to the Unit Power Sales
Agreement. Payments under the Unit Power Sales Agreement are System
Energy's only source of operating revenues.
Net
income remained relatively flat, decreasing $0.4 million for the third quarter
2009 compared to the third quarter 2008, and increasing $2.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2008.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Cash
Flow
Cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
||||
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
$102,788
|
$105,005
|
|||
Cash
flow provided by (used in):
|
|||||
Operating
activities
|
206,833
|
182,238
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
(67,745)
|
(79,376)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
(92,277)
|
(72,001)
|
|||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
46,811
|
30,861
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$149,599
|
$135,866
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash provided by operating
activities increased $24.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due
to:
·
|
a
decrease of $7.7 million in income tax
payments;
|
·
|
a
decrease of $4.6 million in interest payments;
and
|
·
|
the
timing of payments to vendors.
|
158
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
Investing
Activities
Net cash
used in investing activities decreased $11.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to money pool activity, partially offset by an increase in
construction expenditures related to dry fuel storage, security projects, and
new nuclear spending. Increases in System Energy's receivable from
the money pool are a use of cash flow, and System Energy's receivable from the
money pool increased by $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to an increase of $20 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement
designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries' need for external short-term
borrowings.
Financing
Activities
Net cash
used in financing activities increased $20.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to an increase in dividends paid on common stock.
Capital
Structure
System
Energy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the
following table.
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||
Net
debt to net capital
|
44.2%
|
48.2%
|
||
Effect
of subtracting cash from debt
|
4.9%
|
3.0%
|
||
Debt
to capital
|
49.1%
|
51.2%
|
Net debt
consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of
notes payable, capital lease obligations, and long-term debt, including the
currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and common
shareholder's equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and
cash equivalents. System Energy uses the net debt to net capital
ratio in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful
information to its investors and creditors in evaluating System Energy's
financial condition.
Uses
and Sources of Capital
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Liquidity
and Capital Resources" in the Form 10-K for a
discussion of System Energy's uses and sources of capital. System
Energy is developing its capital plan for 2010 through 2012 and currently
anticipates making $541 million in capital investments during that period,
including approximately $49 million for maintenance of existing
assets. The remaining $492 million is associated with specific
investments such as the Grand Gulf power uprate project. The
following are updates to the Form 10-K.
In May 2009, 364-day letters of credit
in the aggregate amount of approximately $179 million were issued pursuant to
System Energy’s short-term borrowing authority to the owner participants in
System Energy’s 1988 sale and leaseback of interests in Grand Gulf.
As discussed in the Form 10-K as a
potential use of capital, System Energy plans a 178 MW uprate of the Grand Gulf
nuclear plant. The project is expected to cost $575
million. On May 22, 2009, a petition and supporting testimony were
filed at the MPSC requesting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
for implementation of the uprate. The City Council is the only party
that has intervened in the case. A hearing was held on October 29,
2009.
159
System
Energy Resources, Inc.
Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis
System
Energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows:
September
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2007
|
|||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||
$44,879
|
$42,915
|
$73,614
|
$53,620
|
See Note
4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money
pool.
Pension
Contributions
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on pension
contributions.
Nuclear
Matters
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS – Nuclear
Matters" in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.
Environmental
Risks
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS – Environmental
Risks" in the
Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.
Critical Accounting
Estimates
See "MANAGEMENT'S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS - Critical
Accounting Estimates" in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates
and judgments necessary in System Energy's accounting for nuclear
decommissioning costs and qualified pension and other postretirement
benefits.
Nuclear
Decommissioning Costs
In the second quarter 2009, System
Energy recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liabilities for
Grand Gulf as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The
revised estimate resulted in a $4.2 million reduction in its decommissioning
liability, along with a corresponding reduction in the related regulatory
asset.
Qualified
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
See the
"Critical
Accounting Estimates -
Qualified Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits - Costs and Funding"
section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial
Discussion and Analysis for an update to the Form 10-K discussion on qualified
pension and other postretirement benefits.
New Accounting
Pronouncements
See "New
Accounting Pronouncements" section of Entergy Corporation and
Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of
new accounting pronouncements.
160
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
INCOME
STATEMENTS
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Electric
|
$ | 148,789 | $ | 142,045 | $ | 406,548 | $ | 384,783 | ||||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Operation
and Maintenance:
|
||||||||||||||||
Fuel,
fuel-related expenses, and
|
||||||||||||||||
gas
purchased for resale
|
16,152 | 11,315 | 47,480 | 34,619 | ||||||||||||
Nuclear
refueling outage expenses
|
4,811 | 4,256 | 14,398 | 12,669 | ||||||||||||
Other
operation and maintenance
|
32,020 | 30,712 | 90,485 | 87,709 | ||||||||||||
Decommissioning
|
7,364 | 6,972 | 21,953 | 20,543 | ||||||||||||
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
6,032 | 6,068 | 18,538 | 10,097 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
42,212 | 36,427 | 94,373 | 87,504 | ||||||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(3,263 | ) | (4,641 | ) | (13,744 | ) | (9,198 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
105,328 | 91,109 | 273,483 | 243,943 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING
INCOME
|
43,461 | 50,936 | 133,065 | 140,840 | ||||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
2,825 | 1,367 | 9,439 | 3,733 | ||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
2,683 | 2,134 | 4,239 | 8,346 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
- net
|
(183 | ) | (116 | ) | (445 | ) | (404 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
5,325 | 3,385 | 13,233 | 11,675 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
on long-term debt
|
12,798 | 16,065 | 35,154 | 39,348 | ||||||||||||
Other
interest - net
|
86 | 157 | 214 | 237 | ||||||||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds used during construction
|
(950 | ) | (458 | ) | (3,167 | ) | (1,251 | ) | ||||||||
TOTAL
|
11,934 | 15,764 | 32,201 | 38,334 | ||||||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
36,852 | 38,557 | 114,097 | 114,181 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
14,826 | 16,173 | 45,986 | 48,105 | ||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 22,026 | $ | 22,384 | $ | 68,111 | $ | 66,076 | ||||||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
161
(Page left blank intentionally)
162
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 68,111 | $ | 66,076 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Other
regulatory credits - net
|
(13,744 | ) | (9,198 | ) | ||||
Depreciation,
amortization, and decommissioning
|
116,326 | 108,047 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes
accrued
|
164,366 | 35,202 | ||||||
Changes
in working capital:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
(950 | ) | 10,937 | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
8,616 | 2,846 | ||||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
(132,362 | ) | - | |||||
Interest
accrued
|
(15,847 | ) | (16,330 | ) | ||||
Other
working capital accounts
|
7,320 | (21,352 | ) | |||||
Provision
for estimated losses and reserves
|
(99 | ) | (389 | ) | ||||
Changes
in other regulatory assets
|
(9,558 | ) | 4,390 | |||||
Other
|
14,654 | 2,009 | ||||||
Net
cash flow provided by operating activities
|
206,833 | 182,238 | ||||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Construction
expenditures
|
(56,605 | ) | (43,099 | ) | ||||
Allowance
for equity funds used during construction
|
9,439 | 3,733 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel purchases
|
- | (63,319 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from the sale/leaseback of nuclear fuel
|
- | 63,322 | ||||||
Proceeds
from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
|
338,124 | 344,772 | ||||||
Investment
in nuclear decommissioning trust funds
|
(356,897 | ) | (364,791 | ) | ||||
Changes
in money pool receivable - net
|
(1,964 | ) | (19,994 | ) | ||||
Other
|
158 | - | ||||||
Net
cash flow used in investing activities
|
(67,745 | ) | (79,376 | ) | ||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
(28,440 | ) | (26,701 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
(60,800 | ) | (45,200 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(3,037 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||
Net
cash flow used in financing activities
|
(92,277 | ) | (72,001 | ) | ||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
46,811 | 30,861 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
102,788 | 105,005 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 149,599 | $ | 135,866 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
- net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 47,425 | $ | 52,060 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 8,336 | $ | 16,072 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
163
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 26 | $ | 250 | ||||
Temporary
cash investments
|
149,573 | 102,538 | ||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
149,599 | 102,788 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
93,084 | 91,119 | ||||||
Other
|
4,023 | 3,074 | ||||||
Total
accounts receivable
|
97,107 | 94,193 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
25,560 | - | ||||||
Materials
and supplies - at average cost
|
79,917 | 74,496 | ||||||
Deferred
nuclear refueling outage costs
|
12,088 | 26,485 | ||||||
Prepaid
taxes
|
207,141 | 74,779 | ||||||
Prepayments
and other
|
2,649 | 993 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
574,061 | 373,734 | ||||||
OTHER
PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
|
||||||||
Decommissioning
trust funds
|
314,574 | 268,822 | ||||||
Note
receivable - Entergy New Orleans
|
- | 25,560 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
314,574 | 294,382 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT
|
||||||||
Electric
|
3,314,854 | 3,314,473 | ||||||
Property
under capital lease
|
479,933 | 479,933 | ||||||
Construction
work in progress
|
175,144 | 122,952 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel under capital lease
|
88,424 | 125,416 | ||||||
Nuclear
fuel
|
4,492 | 7,448 | ||||||
TOTAL
UTILITY PLANT
|
4,062,847 | 4,050,222 | ||||||
Less
- accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
2,287,826 | 2,206,780 | ||||||
UTILITY
PLANT - NET
|
1,775,021 | 1,843,442 | ||||||
DEFERRED
DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
||||||||
Regulatory
assets:
|
||||||||
Regulatory
asset for income taxes - net
|
99,612 | 89,473 | ||||||
Other
regulatory assets
|
300,377 | 333,389 | ||||||
Other
|
12,397 | 10,970 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
412,386 | 433,832 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 3,076,042 | $ | 2,945,390 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
164
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
||||||||
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
||||||||
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(In
Thousands)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Currently
maturing long-term debt
|
$ | 41,715 | $ | 28,440 | ||||
Accounts
payable:
|
||||||||
Associated
companies
|
2,159 | 2,723 | ||||||
Other
|
44,395 | 35,215 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes
|
4,079 | 9,645 | ||||||
Interest
accrued
|
32,743 | 48,590 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
37,619 | 37,619 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
162,710 | 162,232 | ||||||
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accumulated
deferred income taxes and taxes accrued
|
540,799 | 365,134 | ||||||
Accumulated
deferred investment tax credits
|
59,100 | 61,708 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
50,805 | 87,797 | ||||||
Other
regulatory liabilities
|
210,911 | 197,051 | ||||||
Decommissioning
|
413,910 | 396,201 | ||||||
Accumulated
provisions
|
1,926 | 2,025 | ||||||
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
68,995 | 72,008 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
703,241 | 744,900 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
2,049,687 | 1,926,824 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding 789,350 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
789,350 | 789,350 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
74,295 | 66,984 | ||||||
TOTAL
|
863,645 | 856,334 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
|
$ | 3,076,042 | $ | 2,945,390 | ||||
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
|
165
|
ENTERGY
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
See "PART I, Item 1, Litigation"
in the Form 10-K for a discussion of legal, administrative, and other regulatory
proceedings affecting Entergy, and also see "Item 5, Other Information,
Environmental
Regulation",
below, for updates regarding environmental proceedings and
regulation.
Ratepayer
Lawsuits
Entergy
New Orleans Fuel Adjustment Clause Litigation
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed by a group of ratepayers in
April 1999 against Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services,
and Entergy Power in state court in Orleans Parish purportedly on behalf of all
Entergy New Orleans ratepayers, which currently remains pending, and the
corresponding complaint filed with the City Council. In February
2004, the City Council approved a resolution that resulted in a refund to
customers of $11.3 million, including interest, during the months of June
through September 2004. In May 2005 the Civil District Court for
the Parish of Orleans affirmed the City Council resolution, finding no support
for the plaintiffs' claim that the refund amount should be higher. In
June 2005, the plaintiffs appealed the Civil District Court decision to the
Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal. On February 25, 2008, the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal issued a decision affirming in part, and
reversing in part, the Civil District Court's decision. Although the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal did not reverse any of the substantive findings
and conclusions of the City Council or the Civil District Court, the Fourth
Circuit found that the amount of the refund was arbitrary and capricious and
increased the amount of the refund to $34.3 million. In April 2009 the
Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Louisiana Fourth Circuit
Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision of the Civil District
Court. On April 17, 2009, the plaintiffs requested rehearing by the
Louisiana Supreme Court. On May 29, 2009, the Louisiana Supreme Court
denied the request for rehearing.
Texas
Power Price Lawsuit
See the
Form 10-K for a discussion of the lawsuit filed in August 2003 in the district
court of Chambers County, Texas by Texas residents purportedly on behalf of the
Texas retail customers of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. who were billed and paid for
electric power from January 1, 1994 to the present. The plaintiffs
stated in their pleadings that customers in Texas were charged at least $57
million above prevailing market prices for power. Plaintiffs seek
actual, consequential and exemplary damages, costs and attorneys' fees, and
disgorgement of profits. The plaintiffs' experts have tendered a
report calculating damages in a large range, from $153 million to $972 million
in present value, under various scenarios. The Entergy defendants
have tendered expert reports challenging the assumptions, methodologies, and
conclusions of the plaintiffs' expert reports. The case is pending in state
district court.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in "PART I, Item 1A, Risk
Factors" in the Form 10-K.
166
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities (1)
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid
per
Share
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of a
Publicly
Announced
Plan
|
Maximum
$
Amount
of
Shares that May
Yet
be Purchased
Under
a Plan (2)
|
||||
7/01/2009-7/31/2009
|
355,000
|
$79.44
|
355,000
|
$581,424,514
|
||||
8/01/2009-8/31/2009
|
4,335,000
|
$79.90
|
4,335,000
|
$235,070,434
|
||||
9/01/2009-9/30/2009
|
2,990,000
|
$79.79
|
2,990,000
|
$-(3)
|
||||
Total
|
7,680,000
|
$-
|
7,680,000
|
(1)
|
In
accordance with Entergy's stock-based compensation plans, Entergy
periodically grants stock options to key employees, which may be exercised
to obtain shares of Entergy's common stock. According to the
plans, these shares can be newly issued shares, treasury stock, or shares
purchased on the open market. Entergy's management has been
authorized by the Board to repurchase on the open market shares up to an
amount sufficient to fund the exercise of grants under the
plans. In addition to this authority, on January 29, 2007, the
Board approved a repurchase program under which Entergy was authorized to
repurchase up to $1.5 billion of its common stock. In January
2008, the Board authorized an incremental $500 million share repurchase
program to enable Entergy to consider opportunistic purchases in response
to equity market conditions. Entergy completed both the $1.5
billion and $500 million programs in the third quarter
2009. See Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K
for additional discussion of the stock-based compensation
plans.
|
(2)
|
Maximum
amount of shares that may yet be repurchased does not include an estimate
of the amount of shares that may be purchased to fund the exercise of
grants under the stock-based compensation
plans.
|
(3)
|
In
October 2009 the Board granted authority for an additional $750 million
share repurchase program.
|
The
amount of share repurchases may vary as a result of material changes in business
results or capital spending or new investment opportunities.
Item
5. Other Information
Environmental
Regulation
Clean Air Act and Subsequent
Amendments
Ozone
Nonattainment
As disclosed in the Form 10-K, on March
12, 2008, the EPA revised the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone,
creating the potential for additional counties and parishes in which Entergy
operates to be placed in nonattainment status. The LDEQ recommended
that eleven parishes be designated as nonattainment for the 75 parts per billion
ozone standard. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has two fossil plants
and Entergy Louisiana has one fossil plant affected by this
recommendation. In Arkansas, the Governor recommended that Pulaski
County be designated in nonattainment with the new ozone standard, where two of
Entergy Arkansas' smaller facilities are located. These
recommendations have not been approved yet by the EPA, and in September 2009 the
EPA announced that it is reconsidering the 75 parts per billion standard and may
lower it further. Lowering the standard would cause the need for
additional analysis of county and parish attainment status. A
proposed rule is expected to be published in December 2009 and a final rule to
be promulgated in August 2010. Therefore, additional counties or
parishes may be affected. Following nonattainment designation, states
will be required to develop state implementation plans that outline control
requirements that will enable the affected counties and parishes to reach
attainment status. Entergy facilities in these areas may be subject
to installation of NOx controls, but the degree of control will remain unknown
until the state implementation plans are developed. Entergy will
continue to monitor and engage in the state implementation plan development
process in Entergy states.
167
Regional
Haze
Entergy Arkansas has withdrawn its
petition (discussed in the Form 10-K) to the Arkansas Commission on
Environmental Quality requesting the revision of Regulation 19, which sets an
operational deadline of September 2013 for the regional haze air emissions
control project at Entergy Arkansas' White Bluff facility. Entergy
Arkansas is proceeding with the regulatory approval process for the installation
and operation of required emission controls.
Potential
Legislative, Regulatory, and Judicial Developments
In April 2009 the EPA issued a proposal
"to find that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere endanger the public health and
welfare of current and future generations" pursuant to section 202(a) of the
Clean Air Act in response to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in
Massachusetts v.
EPA. The EPA published the proposed endangerment finding in the
Federal Register on April 24, 2009, and began a sixty-day notice and comment
period on the proposal. The current proposal applies directly only to
emissions from mobile sources such as cars and trucks. The proposed endangerment
finding lists six air pollutants, including CO2, that
would undergo further proposed EPA regulation as mobile source emissions under
the Clean Air Act. The EPA has stated that the endangerment finding itself
does not create any immediate requirements for any emissions source, but this
regulatory action may lead to the proposal of similar regulations to control
greenhouse gas emissions, including CO2, from
stationary sources such as Entergy's facilities either through new EPA
regulations or may lead to the application of the Clean Air Act's current new
source review program or new source performance standard program to greenhouse
gas emissions. Such a proposal of new regulations applicable to stationary
sources would undergo a notice-and-comment rulemaking process through the
EPA. In September 2009, however, the EPA proposed a rule that
anticipates the automatic application of the current Clean Air Act programs to
new and modified sources of greenhouse gases once mobile source emission rules
are finalized, which is expected by the end of March 2010. The
so-called "tailoring rule" restricts the applicability of the current regulatory
programs to new sources of greater than 25,000 tons of greenhouse gases and to
modifications that increase greenhouse gas emissions by from 10,000 to 25,000
tons per year. The effect on Entergy is impossible to estimate at this
time due to the uncertainty of the final regulatory format.
Clean Water
Act
316(b)
Cooling Water Intake Structures
As discussed in the Form 10-K, the EPA
finalized new regulations in July 2004 governing the intake of water at large
existing power plants employing cooling water intake structures. The
rule sought to reduce perceived impacts on aquatic resources by requiring
covered facilities to implement technology or other measures to meet
EPA-targeted reductions in water use and corresponding perceived aquatic
impacts. Entergy, other industry members and industry groups,
environmental groups, and a coalition of northeastern and mid-Atlantic states
challenged various aspects of the rule. In January 2007, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded the rule to the EPA for
reconsideration. The court instructed the EPA to reconsider several
aspects of the rule that were beneficial to the regulated community after
finding that these provisions of the rule were contrary to the language of the
Clean Water Act or were not sufficiently explained in the rule. In
April 2008, the United States Supreme Court agreed to review the decision of the
Second Circuit on the question of whether the EPA may take into consideration a
cost-benefit analysis in developing these regulations, a consideration of
potential benefit to the regulated community that the Second Circuit
disallowed. In March 2009, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the
petitioners that cost-benefit analysis may be taken into
consideration. The EPA may now reissue a rule similar in structure to
the rule remanded by the Second Circuit, or the EPA may issue a rule with a
substantially different structure and effect. Until the EPA issues
guidance to the regulated community on what actions should be taken to comply
with the Clean Water Act, and until the form and substance of the new rule
itself is determined, it is impossible to estimate the effect of the Supreme
Court's decision on Entergy's business.
On April 6, 2009, with a reservation of
rights regarding the applicability of the section, Entergy's Indian Point
facility submitted a Section 401 water quality certification to the
NYSDEC. The certification, or a waiver or exemption of the same, is
potentially required pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act as a
supporting document to the NRC's license renewal decision. On May 13,
2009, the NYSDEC deemed the application incomplete, requested additional
information, and requested that Entergy respond within 120 days or
by
168
September
10, 2009. The NYSDEC also stated that Entergy must submit all
requested information by February 13, 2010. Prior to and on September
9, 2009, Entergy responded and provided some of the requested information,
including an extensive list of responsive documents. On September 23,
2009, the NYSDEC requested additional information and set an interim deadline of
November 13, 2009. Entergy continues to work with the NYSDEC in order
to provide the additional information before the requested
deadlines. By law, the NYSDEC must act on the application within one
year of receipt.
Groundwater at Certain
Nuclear Sites
As discussed in the Form 10-K, Entergy
joined other nuclear utilities and the Nuclear Energy Institute in 2006 to
develop a voluntary groundwater monitoring and protection
program. This initiative began after detection of very low levels of
radioactive material, primarily tritium, in groundwater at several plants in the
United States. To date, radionuclides have been detected at Entergy's
Indian Point, Palisades and Pilgrim plants. The situation at Indian
Point is described in the Form 10-K.
At Palisades, Entergy identified
tritium in two monitoring wells in December 2007 due to leakage
from buried piping. Non-destructive evaluation of the line
identified one area of leakage and repairs were completed in
2008. Since early 2008, groundwater from three wells has been sampled
and analyzed on a biweekly basis. Following the repairs, tritium levels declined
in all of the wells and trended downward until one well spiked in March 2009.
Additional investigation was performed to locate the source, including
installation of eighteen temporary monitoring wells along the path of
the buried piping. A new leak location was identified and repairs
at this location were completed in mid-summer 2009. When the system
was put back in service, however, it became evident from groundwater samples
that this same buried piping system was also breached at locations other than at
the leak location that had earlier been repaired. Therefore, the piping
system was again taken out of service and drained to prevent further leakage
into the ground. Subsequently, a decision was made to abandon this
piping and to run new replacement buried pipe for this system. This effort
is currently in progress. Bi-weekly sampling will continue until the
groundwater tritium levels in the monitoring wells are below minimum
detection levels.
At Pilgrim, six existing monitoring
wells are being sampled and analyzed on a periodic basis. Results
continue to show low levels of tritium. A hydrogeological analysis
will be performed in 2009 to pinpoint the location for six additional wells to
further study the situation. Currently, the detections are believed
to be from wash out of naturally occurring atmospheric
tritium. Precipitation studies are being performed to confirm this
theory.
Other Environmental
Matters
Entergy
Louisiana and Entergy New Orleans
In March 2009, Entergy Louisiana
received a Certificate of Completion from the LDEQ for the former site of the
Southern Transformer Shop, located in Algiers, Orleans Parish. This
document certifies completion of the soil remediation in compliance with
Louisiana's "Voluntary Remediation Program." Prior to the soil
remediation, which was completed in January 2008, a thorough site assessment and
risk evaluation had been performed at the property utilizing Louisiana's Risk
Evaluation and Corrective Action Program.
169
Earnings
Ratios (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy
Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System
Energy)
The Registrant Subsidiaries have
calculated ratios of earnings to fixed charges and ratios of earnings to
combined fixed charges and preferred dividends/distributions pursuant to Item
503 of Regulation S-K of the SEC as follows:
Ratios
of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
||||||||||||
Twelve
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
3.37
|
3.75
|
3.37
|
3.19
|
2.33
|
2.22
|
||||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
3.04
|
3.34
|
3.01
|
2.84
|
2.44
|
2.51
|
||||||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
3.60
|
3.50
|
3.23
|
3.44
|
3.14
|
3.47
|
||||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
3.41
|
3.16
|
2.54
|
3.22
|
2.92
|
3.17
|
||||||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
3.60
|
1.22
|
1.52
|
2.74
|
3.71
|
3.46
|
||||||
Entergy
Texas
|
2.07
|
2.06
|
2.12
|
2.07
|
2.04
|
1.83
|
||||||
System
Energy
|
3.95
|
3.85
|
4.05
|
3.95
|
3.29
|
3.55
|
Ratios
of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges
and
Preferred Dividends/Distributions
|
||||||||||||
Twelve
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Entergy
Arkansas
|
2.98
|
3.34
|
3.06
|
2.88
|
1.95
|
1.84
|
||||||
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana
|
2.90
|
3.18
|
2.90
|
2.73
|
2.42
|
2.49
|
||||||
Entergy
Louisiana
|
3.60
|
3.50
|
2.90
|
3.08
|
2.87
|
3.49
|
||||||
Entergy
Mississippi
|
3.07
|
2.83
|
2.34
|
2.97
|
2.67
|
2.92
|
||||||
Entergy
New Orleans
|
3.31
|
1.12
|
1.35
|
2.54
|
3.45
|
3.20
|
The
Registrant Subsidiaries accrue interest expense related to unrecognized tax
benefits in income tax expense and do not include it in fixed
charges.
Item
6. Exhibits *
4(a)
|
Seventy-seventh
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2009, to Entergy Gulf
States Louisiana's Indenture of Mortgage, dated as of September 1,
1926.
|
|
12(a)
-
|
Entergy
Arkansas' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as
defined.
|
|
12(b)
-
|
Entergy
Gulf States Louisiana's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as
defined.
|
|
12(c)
-
|
Entergy
Louisiana's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as
defined.
|
|
12(d)
-
|
Entergy
Mississippi's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as
defined.
|
|
12(e)
-
|
Entergy
New Orleans' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as
defined.
|
170
12(f)
-
|
Entergy
Texas' Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as
defined.
|
|
12(g)
-
|
System
Energy's Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as
defined.
|
|
31(a)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Corporation.
|
|
31(b)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Corporation.
|
|
31(c)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
31(d)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
31(e)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana.
|
|
31(f)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States
Louisiana.
|
|
31(g)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Louisiana.
|
|
31(h)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Louisiana.
|
|
31(i)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Mississippi.
|
|
31(j)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy
Mississippi.
|
|
31(k)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New
Orleans.
|
|
31(l)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New
Orleans.
|
|
31(m)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
31(n)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
31(o)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
|
|
31(p)
-
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.
|
|
32(a)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
|
|
32(b)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.
|
|
32(c)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
32(d)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.
|
|
32(e)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
|
|
32(f)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.
|
|
32(g)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
|
|
32(h)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.
|
|
32(i)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.
|
|
32(j)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy
Mississippi.
|
171
32(k)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
|
|
32(l)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.
|
|
32(m)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
32(n)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.
|
|
32(o)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for System Energy.
|
|
32(p)
-
|
Section
1350 Certification for System Energy.
|
|
101
INS -
|
XBRL
Instance Document.
|
|
101
SCH -
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101
PRE -
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
LAB -
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
CAL -
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
DEF -
|
XBRL
Definition Linkbase Document.
|
___________________________
Pursuant
to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Entergy Corporation agrees to furnish
to the Commission upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt
that is not registered or listed herein as an Exhibit because the total amount
of securities authorized under such agreement does not exceed ten percent of the
total assets of Entergy Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis.
*
|
Reference
is made to a duplicate list of exhibits being filed as a part of this
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, which list,
prepared in accordance with Item 102 of Regulation S-T of the SEC,
immediately precedes the exhibits being filed with this report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009.
|
172
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized. The signature for each undersigned company shall be
deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company or its
subsidiaries.
ENTERGY
CORPORATION
ENTERGY
ARKANSAS, INC.
ENTERGY
GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
ENTERGY
LOUISIANA, LLC
ENTERGY
MISSISSIPPI, INC.
ENTERGY
NEW ORLEANS, INC.
ENTERGY
TEXAS, INC.
SYSTEM
ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
|
/s/
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Theodore
H. Bunting, Jr
Senior
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(For
each Registrant and for each as
Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
Date: November
6, 2009
173