ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

epdform10q_063012.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___ to ___.

Commission file number: 1-14323

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		76-0568219
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)

	1100 Louisiana Street, 10th Floor
	Houston, Texas 77002
	(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

	(713) 381-6500
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

There were 884,165,626 common units and 4,520,431 Class B units (which generally vote together with the common units) of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. outstanding at July 31, 2012. Our common units trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “EPD.”

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
Item 1.	Financial Statements.
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	2
	Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations	3
	Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income	4
	Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows	5
	Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Equity	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
	1. Partnership Operations, Organization and Basis of Presentation	7
	2. General Accounting Matters	8
	3. Equity-based Awards	11
	4. Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements	13
	5. Inventories	22
	6. Property, Plant and Equipment	23
	7. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates	24
	8. Intangible Assets and Goodwill	27
	9. Debt Obligations	29
	10. Equity and Distributions	31
	11. Business Segments	34
	12. Related Party Transactions	38
	13. Earnings Per Unit	39
	14. Commitments and Contingencies	40
	15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information	41
	16. Insurance Matters	42
	17. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information	43
	18. Subsequent Events	50
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	51
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.	73
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	76

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	76
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	76
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	77
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	77
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	77
Item 5.	Other Information.	77
Item 6.	Exhibits.	77

Signatures		85

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

Item 1. Financial Statements.

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in millions)

	June 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2012			2011
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14.5		$	19.8
Restricted cash		--			38.5
Accounts receivable – trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $13.0 at June 30, 2012 and $13.4 at December 31, 2011		3,724.9			4,501.8
Accounts receivable – related parties		2.3			43.5
Inventories		892.9			1,111.7
Prepaid and other current assets		434.8			353.4
Total current assets		5,069.4			6,068.7
Property, plant and equipment, net		23,760.6			22,191.6
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		913.2			1,859.6
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,019.3 at June 30, 2012 and $990.4 at December 31, 2011		1,619.2			1,656.2
Goodwill		2,092.3			2,092.3
Other assets		212.4			256.7
Total assets	$	33,667.1		$	34,125.1

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of debt	$	1,700.0		$	500.0
Accounts payable – trade		762.6			773.0
Accounts payable – related parties		70.2			211.6
Accrued product payables		4,039.7			5,047.1
Accrued interest		289.1			288.1
Other current liabilities		756.7			612.6
Total current liabilities		7,618.3			7,432.4
Long-term debt (see Note 9)		13,346.7			14,029.4
Deferred tax liabilities		23.8			91.2
Other long-term liabilities		202.2			352.8
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)
Equity: (see Note 10)
Partners’ equity:
Limited partners:
Common units (884,174,991 units outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 881,620,418 units outstanding at December 31, 2011)		12,566.5			12,346.3
Class B units (4,520,431 units outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		118.5			118.5
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(318.7	)		(351.4	)
Total partners’ equity		12,366.3			12,113.4
Noncontrolling interests		109.8			105.9
Total equity		12,476.1			12,219.3
Total liabilities and equity	$	33,667.1		$	34,125.1

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

(Dollars in millions, except per unit amounts)

	For the Three Months						For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues:
Third parties	$	9,764.2		$	11,072.3		$	20,985.9		$	21,005.9
Related parties		25.6			144.2			56.4			394.3
Total revenues (see Note 11)		9,789.8			11,216.5			21,042.3			21,400.2
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs and expenses:
Third parties		8,788.0			10,140.6			19,106.8			19,252.1
Related parties		221.5			392.7			369.9			818.3
Total operating costs and expenses		9,009.5			10,533.3			19,476.7			20,070.4
General and administrative costs:
Third parties		16.7			16.3			40.3			29.2
Related parties		25.8			34.1			48.5			59.1
Total general and administrative costs		42.5			50.4			88.8			88.3
Total costs and expenses (see Note 11)		9,052.0			10,583.7			19,565.5			20,158.7
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		11.3			11.1			21.2			27.3
Operating income		749.1			643.9			1,498.0			1,268.8
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(186.6	)		(188.3	)		(373.1	)		(372.1	)
Interest income		0.1			0.3			0.4			0.6
Other, net (see Note 2)		13.1			--			71.5			0.2
Total other expense, net		(173.4	)		(188.0	)		(301.2	)		(371.3	)
Income before income taxes		575.7			455.9			1,196.8			897.5
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes (see Note 2)		(8.5	)		(7.4	)		25.9			(14.5	)
Net income		567.2			448.5			1,222.7			883.0
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (see Note 10)		(0.9	)		(14.8	)		(5.1	)		(28.6	)
Net income attributable to limited partners	$	566.3		$	433.7		$	1,217.6		$	854.4

Earnings per unit: (see Note 13)
Basic earnings per unit	$	0.66		$	0.53		$	1.42		$	1.05
Diluted earnings per unit	$	0.64		$	0.51		$	1.37		$	1.00

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in millions)

	For the Three Months						For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011

Net income	$	567.2		$	448.5		$	1,222.7		$	883.0
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Cash flow hedges:
Commodity derivative instruments:
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges		105.0			(21.7	)		45.4			(173.1	)
Reclassification of gains and losses to net income		14.2			74.8			36.2			143.7
Interest rate derivative instruments:
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedges		(84.0	)		(60.1	)		(55.1	)		(46.0	)
Reclassification of gains and losses to net income		3.7			1.5			6.4			3.0
Total cash flow hedges		38.9			(5.5	)		32.9			(72.4	)
Change in funded status of pension and postretirement plans, net of tax		--			(0.9	)		(1.2	)		(0.6	)
Proportionate share of other comprehensive income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliate		--			0.3			1.0			(0.7	)
Change in fair value of available-for-sale equity securities		(15.8	)		--			--			--
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		23.1			(6.1	)		32.7			(73.7	)
Comprehensive income		590.3			442.4			1,255.4			809.3
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(0.9	)		(14.8	)		(5.1	)		(28.6	)
Comprehensive income attributable to limited partners	$	589.4		$	427.6		$	1,250.3		$	780.7

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in millions)

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,222.7		$	883.0
Reconciliation of net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		537.7			484.8
Non-cash asset impairment charges		14.5			--
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		(21.2	)		(27.3	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates		50.5			84.8
Gains related to asset sales		(3.8	)		(23.6	)
Gains related to property damage insurance recoveries (see Note 16)		(27.7	)		--
Gains related to sales of Energy Transfer Equity common units (see Note 7)		(68.8	)		--
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		(64.9	)		2.3
Changes in fair market value of derivative instruments		(21.6	)		(10.7	)
Net effect of changes in operating accounts (see Note 15)		(280.3	)		361.4
Other operating activities		1.2			(0.2	)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		1,338.3			1,754.5
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(1,813.1	)		(1,716.2	)
Contributions in aid of construction costs		10.0			6.4
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		38.5			(17.5	)
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		(125.5	)		(11.8	)
Proceeds from asset sales (see Note 15)		1,129.0			250.5
Proceeds from property damage insurance recoveries (see Note 16)		27.7			--
Other investing activities		(16.4	)		(3.6	)
Cash used in investing activities		(749.8	)		(1,492.2	)
Financing activities:
Borrowings under debt agreements		2,414.6			3,791.1
Repayments of debt		(1,891.0	)		(3,033.5	)
Debt issuance costs		(7.5	)		(12.8	)
Monetization of interest rate derivative instruments (see Note 4)		(77.6	)		(5.7	)
Cash distributions paid to limited partners (see Note 10)		(1,068.6	)		(966.5	)
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests (see Note 10)		(8.1	)		(34.8	)
Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests (see Note 10)		5.9			2.6
Net cash proceeds from issuance of common units		57.7			45.1
Other financing activities		(19.2	)		(4.2	)
Cash used in financing activities		(593.8	)		(218.7	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(5.3	)		43.6
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		19.8			65.5
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	14.5		$	109.1

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EQUITY

(See Note 10 for Unit History, Accumulated Other Comprehensive

Income (Loss) and Noncontrolling Interests)

(Dollars in millions)

	Partners’ Equity
	Limited Partners			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	12,464.8		$	(351.4	)	$	105.9		$	12,219.3
Net income		1,217.6			--			5.1			1,222.7
Cash distributions paid to limited partners		(1,068.6	)		--			--			(1,068.6	)
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests		--			--			(8.1	)		(8.1	)
Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests		--			--			5.9			5.9
Net cash proceeds from issuance of common units		57.7			--			--			57.7
Amortization of fair value of equity-based awards		31.8			--			--			31.8
Cash flow hedges		--			32.9			--			32.9
Other		(18.3	)		(0.2	)		1.0			(17.5	)
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	12,685.0		$	(318.7	)	$	109.8		$	12,476.1

	Partners’ Equity
	Limited Partners			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total
Balance, December 31, 2010	$	11,406.7		$	(32.5	)	$	526.6		$	11,900.8
Net income		854.4			--			28.6			883.0
Cash distributions paid to limited partners		(966.5	)		--			--			(966.5	)
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests		--			--			(34.8	)		(34.8	)
Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests		--			--			2.6			2.6
Net cash proceeds from issuance of common units		45.1			--			--			45.1
Amortization of fair value of equity-based awards		25.2			--			0.1			25.3
Cash flow hedges		--			(72.4	)		--			(72.4	)
Other		(4.5	)		(1.3	)		(2.0	)		(7.8	)
Balance, June 30, 2011	$	11,360.4		$	(106.2	)	$	521.1		$	11,775.3

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

With the exception of per unit amounts, or as noted within the context of each footnote disclosure,

the dollar amounts presented in the tabular data within these footnote disclosures are

stated in millions of dollars.

KEY REFERENCES USED IN THESE

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Enterprise” or “Enterprise Products Partners” are intended to mean the business and operations of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to “EPO” mean Enterprise Products Operating LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Enterprise, and its consolidated subsidiaries, through which Enterprise Products Partners L.P. conducts its business. Enterprise is managed by its general partner, Enterprise Products Holdings LLC (“Enterprise GP”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Dan Duncan LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

The membership interests of Dan Duncan LLC are owned of record by a voting trust, the current trustees (“DD LLC Trustees”) of which are: (i) Randa Duncan Williams, who is also a director of Enterprise GP; (ii) Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham, who is also a director and the Chairman of Enterprise GP; and (iii) Richard H. Bachmann, who is also a director of Enterprise GP. Each of the DD LLC Trustees also currently serves as one of the three managers of Dan Duncan LLC.

References to “EPCO” mean Enterprise Products Company and its privately held affiliates. A majority of the outstanding voting capital stock of EPCO is owned of record by a voting trust, the current trustees (“EPCO Trustees”) of which are: (i) Ms. Williams, who also serves as Chairman of EPCO; (ii) Dr. Cunningham, who also serves as a Vice Chairman of EPCO; and (iii) Mr. Bachmann, who also serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of EPCO. Each of the EPCO Trustees is also a director of EPCO.

In April 2011, we, our general partner, EPD MergerCo LLC (“Duncan MergerCo,” a Delaware limited liability company and our wholly owned subsidiary), Duncan Energy Partners L.P. (“Duncan Energy Partners”) and DEP Holdings, LLC (“DEP GP,” the general partner of Duncan Energy Partners) entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Duncan Merger Agreement”). In September 2011, the Duncan Merger Agreement was approved by the unitholders of Duncan Energy Partners and the merger of Duncan MergerCo with and into Duncan Energy Partners and related transactions were completed, with Duncan Energy Partners surviving such merger as our wholly owned subsidiary (collectively, we refer to these transactions as the “Duncan Merger”). See Note 1 for additional information regarding the Duncan Merger.

References to “Holdings Merger” mean the merger of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of ours, with our subsidiary surviving such merger. The Holdings Merger and related transactions were completed in November 2010.

References to “TEPPCO” mean TEPPCO Partners, L.P. prior to its merger with one of our subsidiaries in October 2009.

References to “Energy Transfer Equity” mean the business and operations of Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We sold the remainder of our limited partner interests in Energy Transfer Equity in April 2012 (see Note 7).

Note 1. Partnership Operations, Organization and Basis of Presentation

General

We are a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, the common units of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “EPD.” We were formed in April 1998

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

to own and operate certain natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) related businesses of EPCO and are now a leading North American provider of midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals. Our midstream energy asset network links producers of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil from some of the largest supply basins in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada and the Gulf of Mexico with domestic consumers and international markets. Our assets include approximately 50,700 miles of onshore and offshore pipelines; 190 million barrels (“MMBbls”) of storage capacity for NGLs, crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals; and 14 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”) of natural gas storage capacity.

Our integrated midstream energy operations include: natural gas gathering, treating, processing, transportation and storage; NGL transportation, fractionation, storage, and import and export terminals; crude oil and refined products transportation, storage, and terminals; offshore production platforms; petrochemical transportation and services; and a marine transportation business that operates primarily on the U.S. inland and Intracoastal Waterway systems and in the Gulf of Mexico. We currently have five active reportable business segments: (i) NGL Pipelines & Services; (ii) Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services; (iii) Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services; (iv) Offshore Pipelines & Services; and (v) Petrochemical & Refined Products Services. All activities included in our sixth reportable business segment, Other Investments, ceased on January 18, 2012, which was the date we discontinued using the equity method to account for our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity (see “Liquidation of Investment in Energy Transfer Equity” under Note 7).

We are 100% owned by our limited partners from an economic perspective. We are managed and controlled by Enterprise GP, which has a non-economic general partner interest in us. We, Enterprise GP, EPCO and Dan Duncan LLC are affiliates and under the collective common control of the DD LLC Trustees and the EPCO Trustees. We have no employees. All of our operating functions and general and administrative support services are provided by employees of EPCO pursuant to an administrative services agreement (the “ASA”) or by other service providers. See Note 12 for information regarding the ASA and other related party matters.

Completion of Duncan Merger

On September 7, 2011, the Duncan Merger Agreement was approved by the unitholders of Duncan Energy Partners and the merger of Duncan MergerCo and Duncan Energy Partners and related transactions were completed, with Duncan Energy Partners surviving such merger as our wholly owned subsidiary. Each issued and outstanding common unit of Duncan Energy Partners was cancelled and converted into the right to receive common units representing limited partner interests in Enterprise based on an exchange ratio of 1.01 Enterprise common units for each Duncan Energy Partners common unit. Enterprise issued 24,277,310 of its common units (net of fractional common units cashed out) as consideration in the Duncan Merger. No Enterprise common units were issued to Enterprise or its subsidiaries as merger consideration. Since we historically consolidated Duncan Energy Partners for financial reporting purposes, the Duncan Merger did not change the basis of presentation of our historical financial statements.

Note 2. General Accounting Matters

Our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the full year of 2012. In our opinion, the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for fair presentation. Although we believe the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate and make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”) filed with the SEC on February 29, 2012.

Contingencies

Certain conditions may exist as of the date our consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to us but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Management has regular quarterly litigation reviews, including updates from legal counsel, to assess the need for accounting recognition or disclosure of these contingencies, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise in judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, our management and legal counsel evaluate the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

We accrue an undiscounted liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not record a contingent liability when the likelihood of loss is probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when it is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote.

For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the impact would be material, we disclose the nature of the contingency and, if feasible, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. See Note 14 for additional information regarding our contingencies.

Derivative Instruments

We use derivative instruments such as futures, swaps, options, forward contracts and other arrangements to manage price risks associated with inventories, firm commitments, interest rates, foreign currencies and certain anticipated future transactions. To qualify for hedge accounting, the hedged item must expose us to risk and the related derivative instrument must reduce that exposure and meet specific hedge documentation requirements related to designation dates, expectations for hedge effectiveness and the probability that hedged future transactions will occur as forecasted. We formally designate derivative instruments as hedges and document and assess their effectiveness at inception of the hedge and on a monthly or quarterly basis thereafter. Forecasted transactions are evaluated for the probability of occurrence and are periodically back-tested once the forecasted period has passed to determine whether similarly forecasted transactions are probable of occurring in the future.

For certain of our physical forward commodity derivative contracts, we apply the normal purchase/normal sale exception, whereby changes in the mark-to-market values of such contracts are not recognized in income. As a result, the revenues and expenses associated with such physical contract transactions are recognized during the period when volumes are physically delivered or received. Physical forward commodity contracts are evaluated for the probability of future delivery and are periodically back-tested once the forecasted period has passed to determine whether similar forward contracts are probable of physically delivering in the future.

See Note 4 for additional information regarding our derivative instruments and related interest rate and commodity hedging activities.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Estimates

Preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates that affect amounts presented in the financial statements. Our most significant estimates relate to (i) the useful lives and depreciation/amortization methods used for fixed and identifiable intangible assets; (ii) measurement of fair value and projections used in impairment testing of fixed and intangible assets (including goodwill); (iii) contingencies; and (iv) revenue and expense accruals.

Actual results could differ materially from our estimates. On an ongoing basis, we review our estimates based on currently available information. Any changes in the facts and circumstances underlying our estimates may require us to update such estimates, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Income Tax Benefit

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized a net income tax benefit of $25.9 million, which was primarily due to a $46.5 million net income tax benefit related to the conversion of certain of our subsidiaries to limited liability companies during the first quarter of 2012, partially offset by accruals for the Texas Margin Tax. The $46.5 million net income tax benefit is attributable to the difference between deferred income taxes accrued by the applicable subsidiaries through the date of conversion and any current income tax due in connection with the conversions.

Other Non-Operating Income

The following table presents the components of “Other, net” income for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months					For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,					Ended June 30,
	2012			2011		2012			2011
Gain on sales of Energy Transfer Equity common units (1)	$	15.5		$	--	$	68.8		$	--
Distribution income from Energy Transfer Equity		--			--		4.1			--
Other		(2.4	)		--		(1.4	)		0.2
Total	$	13.1		$	--	$	71.5		$	0.2

(1) See Note 7 for information regarding our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity.

Recent Accounting Developments

Accounting standard setting organizations have been very active in recent years. Recently, they issued new and revised accounting guidance on a number of topics, including disclosures related to offsetting assets and liabilities. We do not believe that adoption of this new guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 3. Equity-based Awards

An allocated portion of the fair value of EPCO’s equity-based awards is charged to us under the ASA. The following table summarizes the expense we recognized in connection with equity-based awards for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Restricted common unit awards	$	15.7	$	12.1	$	30.5	$	23.5
Unit option awards		0.3		0.8		1.0		1.7
Other (1)		0.5		0.3		1.4		(0.2	)
Total compensation expense	$	16.5	$	13.2	$	32.9	$	25.0

(1) Primarily consists of unit appreciation rights (“UARs”), phantom units and similar awards.

The fair value of equity-classified awards (e.g., restricted common unit and unit option awards) is amortized to earnings over the requisite service or vesting period. Compensation expense for liability-classified awards (e.g., UARs and phantom units) is recognized over the requisite service or vesting period based on the fair value of the award remeasured at each reporting period. Liability-classified awards are settled in cash upon vesting.

At June 30, 2012, EPCO’s significant long-term incentive plans applicable to us were the Enterprise Products 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“1998 Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2008 Enterprise Products Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”). In addition, there were unvested awards outstanding under an inactive plan, the Enterprise Products 2006 TPP Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”). After giving effect to awards granted under the 1998 Plan and 2008 Plan through June 30, 2012, a total of 749,016 and 5,038,468 additional common units could be issued under these plans, respectively.

Restricted Common Unit Awards

Restricted common unit awards allow recipients to acquire our common units (at no cost to the recipient apart from service or other conditions) once a defined vesting period expires, subject to customary forfeiture provisions. As used in the context of EPCO’s long-term incentive plans, the term “restricted common unit” represents a time-vested unit. Such awards are non-vested until the required service period expires. Restricted common unit awards issued in 2012 generally vest at a rate of 25% per year beginning one year after the grant date. Restricted common units are included in the number of common units presented on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of a restricted common unit award is based on the market price per unit of the underlying security on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized based on the grant date fair value, net of an allowance for estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service or vesting period.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents information regarding restricted common unit awards for the period presented:

	Number of Units			Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value per Unit (1)
Restricted common units at December 31, 2011		3,868,216		$	34.22
Granted (2,3)		1,538,438		$	51.92
Vested (3)		(1,236,352	)	$	34.77
Forfeited		(95,575	)	$	38.43
Restricted common units at June 30, 2012		4,074,727		$	40.64

(1) Determined by dividing the aggregate grant date fair value of awards (before an allowance for forfeitures) by the number of awards issued. (2) The aggregate grant date fair value of restricted common unit awards issued in 2012 was $79.9 million based on a grant date market price ranging from $51.92 to $52.26 per unit. An estimated annual forfeiture rate of 3.25% was applied to these awards. (3) Includes awards granted to the independent directors of the board of directors of Enterprise GP as part of their annual compensation for 2012. A total of 10,038 restricted common units were issued in February 2012 to the independent directors of Enterprise GP that immediately vested upon issuance.

Typically, each recipient is also entitled to nonforfeitable cash distributions equal to the product of the number of restricted common units outstanding for the participant and the cash distribution per unit paid to limited partners. Since these restricted common units are participating securities, such distributions are included in “Cash distributions paid to limited partners” as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

The following table presents supplemental information regarding our restricted common unit awards for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cash distributions paid to restricted common unit holders	$	3.0	$	2.7	$	5.4	$	4.8
Total intrinsic value of our restricted common unit awards vesting during period		30.1		20.5		62.7		35.2

For the EPCO group of companies, the unrecognized compensation cost associated with restricted common unit awards was an aggregate $90.3 million at June 30, 2012, of which our allocated share of the cost is currently estimated to be $85.7 million. We expect to recognize our share of the unrecognized compensation cost for these awards over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Unit Option Awards

EPCO’s long-term incentive plans provide for the issuance of non-qualified incentive options. These unit option awards are denominated in our common units. When issued, the exercise price of each unit option grant may be no less than the market price of our common units on the date of grant. In general, option grants have a vesting period of four years from the date of grant and expire at the end of the calendar year following the year of vesting (e.g., an option vesting on May 29, 2011 will expire on December 31, 2012). However, unit options only become exercisable at certain times during the calendar year following the year in which they vest (typically the months of February, May, August and November).

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The fair value of each unit option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense recorded in connection with unit options is based on the grant date fair value of such awards, net of an allowance for estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service or vesting period. The following table presents unit option activity for the period presented:

	Number of Units			Weighted- Average Strike Price (dollars/unit)		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
Unit options at December 31, 2011		3,753,420		$	28.08		2.6	$	11.1
Exercised		(712,280	)	$	30.76
Forfeited		(130,000	)	$	27.12
Unit options at June 30, 2012		2,911,140		$	27.46		2.5	$	14.4
Options exercisable at June 30, 2012		--					--		--

(1) Aggregate intrinsic value reflects fully vested unit options at the date indicated.

In order to fund its unit option-related obligations, EPCO may purchase common units at fair value either in the open market or directly from us. When employees exercise unit options, we reimburse EPCO for the cash difference between the strike price paid by the employee and the actual purchase price paid by EPCO for the units issued to the employee.

The following table presents supplemental information regarding our unit options during the periods presented:

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Total intrinsic value of unit option awards exercised during period	$	--	$	--	$	14.0	$	--
Cash received from EPCO in connection with the exercise of unit option awards		--		--		10.2		--
Unit option-related reimbursements to EPCO		--		--		14.0		--

For the EPCO group of companies, the unrecognized compensation cost associated with unit option awards was an aggregate $2.2 million at June 30, 2012, of which our allocated share of the cost is currently estimated to be $2.0 million. We expect to recognize our share of the unrecognized compensation cost for these awards over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.

Unit Appreciation Rights

At December 31, 2011, there were 107,328 UARs outstanding that had been granted under the 2006 Plan. The accrued liability for UARs at December 31, 2011 was $0.5 million. All of these awards vested in May 2012. The accrued liability for UARs in May 2012 (i.e., immediately before vesting) was $1.4 million. While these awards were outstanding, they were accounted for as liability awards.

Note 4. Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements

In the normal course of our business operations, we are exposed to certain risks, including changes in interest rates and commodity prices. In order to manage risks associated with certain anticipated future transactions, we use derivative instruments. Substantially all of our derivatives are used for non-trading activities.

We are required to recognize derivative instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities on our balance sheet unless such instruments meet certain normal purchase/normal sale criteria. While all derivatives are required to be reported at fair value on the balance sheet, changes in fair value of derivative

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

instruments are reported in different ways, depending on the nature and effectiveness of the hedging activities to which they relate. An effective hedge relationship is one in which the change in fair value of a derivative instrument can be expected to offset 80% to 125% of the changes in fair value of a hedged item at inception and throughout the life of the hedging relationship. Any ineffectiveness associated with a hedge relationship is recognized in earnings immediately. Ineffectiveness can be caused by, among other things, changes in the timing of forecasted transactions or a mismatch of terms between the derivative instrument and the hedged item.

A contract designated as a cash flow hedge of an anticipated transaction that is not probable of occurring is immediately recognized in earnings.

Certain of our derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment; therefore, they are accounted for using mark-to-market accounting.

Interest Rate Hedging Activities

Hedged Transaction	Number and Type of Derivatives Outstanding	Notional Amount	Period of Hedge	Rate Swap	Accounting Treatment
Senior Notes AA	10 fixed-to-floating swaps	$750.0	1/2011 to 2/2016	3.2% to 1.5%	Fair value hedge
Undesignated swaps	6 floating-to-fixed swaps	$600.0	5/2010 to 7/2014	0.5% to 2.0%	Mark-to-market

Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 reflects a benefit of $2.2 million and an expense of $2.2 million, respectively, attributable to interest rate swaps. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, such swaps resulted in a benefit in interest expense of $5.0 million and $7.5 million, respectively.

In February 2012, we settled 11 fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps having an aggregate notional amount of $800.0 million, resulting in gains totaling $37.7 million. As fair value hedges, the unamortized portion of these gains are a component of long-term debt (see Note 9) and are being amortized to earnings (as a decrease in interest expense) using the effective interest method over the forecasted hedged period of approximately three years.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes our portfolio of forward starting swaps outstanding at June 30, 2012. Forward starting swaps hedge the expected underlying benchmark interest rates related to future issuances of debt.

Hedged Transaction	Number and Type of Derivatives Outstanding	Notional Amount	Expected Termination Date	Average Rate Locked	Accounting Treatment
Future debt offering	7 forward starting swaps	$350.0	8/2012	3.7%	Cash flow hedge
Future debt offering	16 forward starting swaps	$1,000.0	3/2013	3.7%	Cash flow hedge

In connection with the issuance of Senior Notes EE in February 2012 (see Note 9), we settled ten forward starting swaps having an aggregate notional amount of $500.0 million, resulting in cash losses totaling $115.3 million. These losses are reflected in other comprehensive income and are being amortized to earnings (as an increase in interest expense) over the forecasted hedge period of ten years using the effective interest method.

In connection with EPO’s agreement to issue Senior Notes FF and Senior Notes GG in August 2012 (see Note 18), we settled seven forward starting swaps having an aggregate notional amount of $350.0 million, resulting in cash losses of $70.2 million. Accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2012 includes $63.9 million of the loss, with the remaining $6.3 million of loss attributable to the period June 30, 2012 through the settlement date of August 1, 2012. The total loss recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income will be amortized to earnings (as an increase in interest expense) over the forecasted hedged period of ten years using the effective interest method.

Although we incurred cash losses upon settlement of our forward starting swaps in February 2012 and August 2012, we benefited from the exceptionally low interest rate environment during these periods relative to the interest rates in effect at the time we entered into the swaps.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Commodity Hedging Activities

The prices of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, refined products and certain petrochemical products are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market conditions and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. In order to manage such price risks, we enter into commodity derivative instruments such as physical forward contracts, futures contracts, fixed-for-float swaps, basis swaps and options contracts. The following table summarizes our commodity derivative instruments outstanding at June 30, 2012:

	Volume (1)		Accounting
Derivative Purpose	Current (2)	Long-Term (2)	Treatment
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Natural gas processing:
Forecasted natural gas purchases for plant thermal reduction (“PTR”) (3)	15.3 Bcf	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Forecasted sales of NGLs (4)	1.6 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Octane enhancement:
Forecasted purchases of NGLs	0.2 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Forecasted sales of octane enhancement products	2.0 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Natural gas marketing:
Forecasted sales of natural gas	1.2 Bcf	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Natural gas storage inventory management activities (Bcf)	11.1 Bcf	n/a	Fair value hedge
NGL marketing:
Forecasted purchases of NGLs and related hydrocarbon products	3.2 MMBbls	0.5 MMBbls	Cash flow hedge
Forecasted sales of NGLs and related hydrocarbon products	3.7 MMBbls	0.5 MMBbls	Cash flow hedge
Refined products marketing:
Forecasted purchases of refined products	0.1 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Forecasted sales of refined products	0.5 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Refined products inventory management activities	0.2 MMBbls	n/a	Fair value hedge
Crude oil marketing:
Forecasted purchases of crude oil	2.8 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Forecasted sales of crude oil	4.1 MMBbls	n/a	Cash flow hedge
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Natural gas risk management activities (5,6)	241.0 Bcf	56.0 Bcf	Mark-to-market
Refined products risk management activities (6)	1.1 MMBbls	n/a	Mark-to-market
Crude oil risk management activities (6)	5.7 MMBbls	n/a	Mark-to-market
(1) Volume for derivatives designated as hedging instruments reflects the total amount of volumes hedged whereas volume for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments reflects the absolute value of derivative notional volumes. (2) The maximum term for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, derivatives designated as fair value hedges and derivatives not designated as hedging instruments is December 2013, March 2013 and October 2015, respectively. (3) PTR represents the British thermal unit (“Btu”) equivalent of the NGLs extracted from natural gas by a processing plant, and includes the natural gas used as plant fuel to extract those liquids, plant flare and other shortages. (4) Forecasted sales of NGL volumes under natural gas processing exclude 2.2 MMBbls of additional hedges executed under contracts that have been designated as normal sales agreements. (5) Current volumes include approximately 62.5 Bcf of physical derivative instruments that are predominantly priced at an index plus a premium or minus a discount related to location differences. (6) Reflects the use of derivative instruments to manage risks associated with transportation, processing and storage assets.

Our predominant commodity hedging strategies are: (i) hedging natural gas processing margins; (ii) hedging anticipated future contracted sales of NGLs, refined products and crude oil associated with volumes held in inventory; and (iii) hedging the fair value of natural gas in inventory. The following information summarizes these hedging strategies:

§	The objective of our natural gas processing strategy is to hedge an amount of gross margin associated with our natural gas processing activities. We achieve this objective by using physical and financial instruments to lock in the purchase prices of natural gas consumed as PTR and the

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

sales prices of the related NGL products. This program consists of (i) the forward sale of a portion of our expected equity NGL production at fixed prices through December 2012, which is achieved through the use of forward physical sales contracts and commodity derivative instruments and (ii) the purchase of commodity derivative instruments having a notional amount based on the volume of natural gas expected to be consumed as PTR in the production of such equity NGL production.

§	The objective of our NGL, refined products and crude oil sales hedging program is to hedge the margins of anticipated future sales of inventory by locking in sales prices through the use of forward physical sales contracts and commodity derivative instruments.

§	The objective of our natural gas and refined products inventory hedging program is to hedge the fair value of natural gas and refined products currently held in inventory by locking in the sales price of the inventory through the use of commodity derivative instruments.

Tabular Presentation of Fair Value Amounts, and Gains and Losses on

Derivative Instruments and Related Hedged Items

The following table provides a balance sheet overview of our derivative assets and liabilities at the dates indicated:

	Asset Derivatives						Liability Derivatives
	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011			June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate derivatives	Other current assets	$	18.6	Other current assets	$	43.7	Other current liabilities	$	230.6	Other current liabilities	$	163.6
Interest rate derivatives	Other assets		26.6	Other assets		44.2	Other liabilities		--	Other liabilities		127.1
Total interest rate derivatives			45.2			87.9			230.6			290.7
Commodity derivatives	Other current assets		127.4	Other current assets		20.3	Other current liabilities		74.6	Other current liabilities		30.3
Commodity derivatives	Other assets		4.8	Other assets		--	Other liabilities		2.1	Other liabilities		0.2
Total commodity derivatives (1)			132.2			20.3			76.7			30.5
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	177.4		$	108.2		$	307.3		$	321.2

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate derivatives	Other current assets	$	--	Other current assets	$	--	Other current liabilities	$	11.0	Other current liabilities	$	10.1
Interest rate derivatives	Other assets		--	Other assets		--	Other liabilities		8.6	Other liabilities		10.6
Total interest rate derivatives			--			--			19.6			20.7
Commodity derivatives	Other current assets		26.0	Other current assets		34.4	Other current liabilities		19.4	Other current liabilities		32.5
Commodity derivatives	Other assets		4.4	Other assets		12.6	Other liabilities		1.8	Other liabilities		2.0
Total commodity derivatives			30.4			47.0			21.2			34.5
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	30.4		$	47.0		$	40.8		$	55.2

(1) Represents commodity derivative instrument transactions that have either not settled or have settled and cash has not been paid or received. Settled and unpaid or unreceived amounts are reflected in either accounts receivable or accounts payable depending on the outcome of the transaction.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables present the effect of our derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations for the periods presented:

Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location	Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
		For the Three Months						For the Six Months
		Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
		2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest rate derivatives	Interest expense	$	4.6		$	21.1		$	3.1		$	8.8
Commodity derivatives	Revenue		(16.4	)		(1.6	)		(15.7	)		(1.3	)
Total		$	(11.8	)	$	19.5		$	(12.6	)	$	7.5

Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location	Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
		For the Three Months						For the Six Months
		Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
		2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest rate derivatives	Interest expense	$	(4.5	)	$	(21.0	)	$	(3.4	)	$	(9.7	)
Commodity derivatives	Revenue		15.9			0.2			16.3			(1.1	)
Total		$	11.4		$	(20.8	)	$	12.9		$	(10.8	)

The following tables present the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income for the periods presented:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Change in Value Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)
	For the Three Months						For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest rate derivatives	$	(84.0	)	$	(60.1	)	$	(55.1	)	$	(46.0	)
Commodity derivatives – Revenue		99.8			(19.4	)		60.2			(174.8	)
Commodity derivatives – Operating costs and expenses		5.2			(2.3	)		(14.8	)		1.7
Total	$	21.0		$	(81.8	)	$	(9.7	)	$	(219.1	)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location	Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) to Income (Effective Portion)
		For the Three Months						For the Six Months
		Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
		2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest rate derivatives	Interest expense	$	(3.7	)	$	(1.5	)	$	(6.4	)	$	(3.0	)
Commodity derivatives	Revenue		(2.6	)		(79.3	)		(12.6	)		(148.5	)
Commodity derivatives	Operating costs and expenses		(11.6	)		4.5			(23.6	)		4.8
Total		$	(17.9	)	$	(76.3	)	$	(42.6	)	$	(146.7	)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location	Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
		For the Three Months				For the Six Months
		Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
		2012		2011		2012		2011
Commodity derivatives	Revenue	$	0.9	$	0.3	$	0.9	$	0.2
Commodity derivatives	Operating costs and expenses		--		--		0.3		--
Total		$	0.9	$	0.3	$	1.2	$	0.2

Over the next twelve months, we expect to reclassify $26.2 million of losses attributable to interest rate derivative instruments from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings as an increase in interest expense. Likewise, we expect to reclassify $57.6 million of gains attributable to commodity

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

derivative instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings, $59.4 million as an increase in revenue and $1.8 million as an increase in operating costs and expenses.

The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations for the periods presented:

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location	Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
		For the Three Months						For the Six Months
		Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
		2012			2011			2012			2011
Interest rate derivatives	Interest expense	$	(1.1	)	$	(11.9	)	$	(3.3	)	$	(10.5	)
Commodity derivatives	Revenue		9.3			9.5			30.1			13.3
Commodity derivatives	Operating costs and expenses		--			--			(2.8	)		--
Total		$	8.2		$	(2.4	)	$	24.0		$	2.8

Fair Value Measurements

Our fair value estimates are based on either (i) actual market data or (ii) assumptions that other market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including estimates of risk, in the principal market of the asset or liability at a specified measure date. Recognized valuation techniques employ inputs such as contractual prices, quoted market prices or rates, operating costs, discount factors and business growth rates. These inputs may be either readily observable, corroborated by market data or generally unobservable. In developing our estimates of fair value, we endeavor to utilize the best information available and apply market-based data to the extent possible. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques (such as the market approach) that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

A three-tier hierarchy has been established that classifies fair value amounts recognized in the financial statements based on the observability of inputs used to estimate such fair values. The hierarchy considers fair value amounts based on observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) to be more reliable and predictable than those based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3). At each balance sheet reporting date, we categorize our financial assets and liabilities using this hierarchy.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the carrying values of our financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2012. These assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis and are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their respective fair value. Our assessment of the relative significance of such inputs requires judgment.

	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Quoted Prices
	in Active
	Markets for		Significant		Significant		Carrying
	Identical Assets		Observable		Unobservable		Value
	and Liabilities		Inputs		Inputs		at June 30,
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		2012
Financial assets:
Interest rate derivatives	$	--	$	45.2	$	--	$	45.2
Commodity derivatives		81.6		73.1		7.9		162.6
Total	$	81.6	$	118.3	$	7.9	$	207.8

Financial liabilities:
Interest rate derivatives	$	--	$	250.2	$	--	$	250.2
Commodity derivatives		39.1		55.8		3.0		97.9
Total	$	39.1	$	306.0	$	3.0	$	348.1

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the overall fair values of our recurring Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the periods presented:

		For the Six Months
		Ended June 30,
	Location	2012			2011
Balance, January 1		$	0.4		$	(25.9	)
Total gains (losses) included in:
Net income (1)	Revenue		0.5			(0.5	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	Commodity derivative instruments – changes in fair value of cash flow hedges		0.5			16.2
Settlements			(0.5	)		0.8
Transfers out of Level 3 (2)			--			9.8
Balance, March 31			0.9			0.4
Total gains (losses) included in:
Net income (1)	Revenue		(1.3	)		1.9
Other comprehensive income (loss)	Commodity derivative instruments – changes in fair value of cash flow hedges		6.0			--
Settlements			(0.7	)		(0.2	)
Balance, June 30		$	4.9		$	2.1

(1) There were $2.0 million and $1.9 million of unrealized losses included in these amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. There were $2.0 million and $1.8 million of unrealized gains included in these amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. (2) Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 during 2011 were primarily due to the change in observability of forward NGL prices.

The following table provides quantitative information about our recurring Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2012:

	Fair Value
	Financial Assets		Financial Liabilities		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range
Commodity derivatives – Propane	$	4.7	$	0.9	Discounted cash flow	Forward commodity price	$0.86-$0.92 /gallon
Commodity derivatives – Natural gasoline		2.7		--	Discounted cash flow	Forward commodity price	$1.83-$1.83 /gallon
Commodity derivatives – Crude oil		0.3		2.0	Discounted cash flow	Forward commodity price	$84.96-$88.71 /barrel
Commodity derivatives – Natural gas		0.2		0.1	Discounted cash flow	Forward commodity price	$3.90-$4.13 /million Btu
Total	$	7.9	$	3.0

We believe certain forward commodity prices are the most significant unobservable inputs in determining our recurring Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2012. In general, changes in the price of the underlying commodity increases or decreases the fair value of a commodity derivative depending on whether the derivative was purchased or sold. We generally expect changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments to be offset by corresponding changes in the fair value of our hedged exposures.

We have a risk management policy that covers our Level 3 commodity derivatives. Governance and oversight of risk management activities for these commodities are provided by our CEO with guidance and support from a risk management committee (“RMC”), which meets quarterly (or on a more frequent basis if needed). Members of executive management attend the RMC meetings, which are chaired by the head of our commodities risk control group. This group is responsible for preparing and distributing daily reports and risk analysis to members of the RMC and other appropriate members of management. These reports include mark-to-market valuations with the one-day and month-to-date changes in fair values. This group also develops and validates forward curves used to determine the fair values of our Level 3 commodity derivatives. These forward curves are based on published indexes, market quotes or are derived from other available inputs.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents information regarding certain long-lived asset amounts measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The estimated fair values are based on the present value of expected future cash flows (Level 3).

	Fair Value Measurements Using								Total
									Non-Cash Asset
	Quoted Prices								Impairment
	in Active		Significant		Significant		Carrying		Charges for the
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Value at		Six Months
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		June 30,		Ended
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		2012		June 30, 2012
NGL Pipelines & Services
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	8.0
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services
Property, plant and equipment, net		--		--		--		--		6.2
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services
Long-lived fixed assets held for sale		--		--		0.5		0.5		0.3
Total	$	--	$	--	$	0.5	$	0.5	$	14.5

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, property, plant and equipment with no future value and a carrying amount of $14.2 million was written-off, resulting in non-cash asset impairment charges for the period. In addition, long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying value of $0.8 million were written down to their fair value of $0.5 million, resulting in non-cash asset impairment charges of $0.3 million, which were included in earnings for the period. Long-lived assets held for sale are a component of “Other assets” as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We did not record any non-cash asset impairment charges during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Forecast data and other assumptions supporting the fair value of long-lived assets being tested for impairment are based on the nonfinancial assets’ highest and best use, which includes estimated probabilities where multiple cash flow outcomes are possible. Such probability weights are generally obtained from business management personnel having oversight responsibilities for the assets in question. Key commercial assumptions (e.g., anticipated operating margins, throughput or processing volume growth rates and timing of cash flows) that represent Level 3 unobservable inputs and test results are reviewed and certified by members of senior management.

Other Fair Value Information

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash balances), accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The estimated total fair value of our fixed-rate debt obligations was approximately $16.27 billion and $15.76 billion at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The aggregate carrying value of these debt obligations was $14.58 billion and $14.33 billion at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These values are based on quoted market prices for such debt or debt of similar terms and maturities (Level 2), our credit standing and the credit standing of our counterparties. Changes in market rates of interest affect the fair value of our fixed-rate debt. The carrying values of our variable-rate long-term debt obligations approximate their fair values since the associated interest rates are market-based. We do not have any long-term investments in debt or equity securities recorded at fair value.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5. Inventories

Our inventory amounts by product type were as follows at the dates indicated:

Available-for-Sale Inventory by Product Type	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
NGLs	$	553.4	$	563.6
Petrochemicals and refined products		246.1		443.4
Crude oil		46.5		39.2
Natural gas		46.9		65.5
Total	$	892.9	$	1,111.7

In those instances where we take ownership of inventory volumes through percent-of-liquids contracts and similar arrangements (as opposed to outright purchases from third parties for cash), these volumes are valued at market-based prices during the month in which they are acquired.

Due to fluctuating commodity prices, we recognize lower of cost or market adjustments when the carrying value of our available-for-sale inventories exceeds their net realizable value. These non-cash charges are a component of cost of sales in the period they are recognized. To the extent our commodity hedging strategies address inventory-related price risks and are successful, these inventory valuation adjustments are mitigated or offset. See Note 4 for a description of our commodity hedging activities.

The following table presents our total cost of sales amounts and lower of cost or market adjustments for the periods indicated:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Cost of sales (1)	$	8,195.2	$	9,790.3	$	17,861.0	$	18,609.6
Lower of cost or market adjustments		8.0		0.5		13.9		1.7
(1) Cost of sales is a component of “Operating costs and expenses,” as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations. Period-to-period fluctuations in these amounts are primarily due to changes in energy commodity prices and sales volumes associated with our marketing activities.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 6. Property, Plant and Equipment

The historical costs of our property, plant and equipment and related accumulated depreciation balances were as follows at the dates indicated:

	Estimated Useful Life in Years	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Plants, pipelines and facilities (1)	3-45 (6)	$	24,105.7	$	22,354.4
Underground and other storage facilities (2)	5-40 (7)		1,455.9		1,388.6
Platforms and facilities (3)	20-31		637.5		637.5
Transportation equipment (4)	3-10		158.4		151.5
Marine vessels (5)	15-30		660.3		615.9
Land			141.7		136.1
Construction in progress			2,275.7		2,145.6
Total			29,435.2		27,429.6
Less accumulated depreciation			5,674.6		5,238.0
Property, plant and equipment, net		$	23,760.6	$	22,191.6

(1) Plants and pipelines include processing plants; NGL, natural gas, crude oil and petrochemical and refined products pipelines; terminal loading and unloading facilities; office furniture and equipment; buildings; laboratory and shop equipment and related assets. (2) Underground and other storage facilities include underground product storage caverns; above ground storage tanks; water wells and related assets. (3) Platforms and facilities include offshore platforms and related facilities and other associated assets located in the Gulf of Mexico. (4) Transportation equipment includes tractor-trailer tank trucks and other vehicles and similar assets used in our operations. (5) Marine vessels include tow boats, barges and related equipment used in our marine transportation business. (6) In general, the estimated useful lives of major assets within this category are: processing plants, 20-35 years; pipelines and related equipment, 5-45 years; terminal facilities, 10-35 years; office furniture and equipment, 3-20 years; buildings, 20-40 years; and laboratory and shop equipment, 5-35 years. (7) In general, the estimated useful lives of assets within this category are: underground storage facilities, 5-35 years; storage tanks, 10-40 years; and water wells, 5-35 years.

The following table summarizes our depreciation expense and capitalized interest amounts for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Depreciation expense (1)	$	222.0	$	189.8	$	434.0	$	376.3
Capitalized interest (2)		29.5		24.8		60.1		42.0
(1) Depreciation expense is a component of “Costs and expenses” as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations. (2) We capitalize interest cost incurred on funds used to construct property, plant and equipment. The capitalized interest is recorded as part of the asset to which it relates and is amortized over the asset’s estimated useful life as a component of depreciation expense. Capitalized interest reduces interest expense during the period it is recorded.

Asset Retirement Obligations

We record asset retirement obligations (“AROs”) related to legal requirements to perform retirement activities as specified in contractual arrangements and/or governmental regulations. When an ARO is incurred, we record a liability for the ARO and capitalize an equal amount as an increase in the carrying value of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the ARO liability is accreted to its present value (through accretion expense) and the capitalized amount is depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related long-term asset. Property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 includes $42.5 million and $37.7 million, respectively, of asset retirement costs capitalized as an increase in the associated long-lived asset.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes changes in our ARO liability balance during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

ARO liability balance, December 31, 2011	$	112.0
Liabilities incurred during period		1.1
Liabilities settled during period		(5.9	)
Revisions in estimated cash flows		8.9
Accretion expense		2.7
ARO liability balance, June 30, 2012	$	118.8

The following table presents our forecast of accretion expense for the periods indicated:

Remainder of 2012				2013				2014				2015				2016
$	2.8			$	6.0			$	6.5			$	6.2			$	6.5

Note 7. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

The following table presents our investments in unconsolidated affiliates by business segment at the dates indicated. Unless noted otherwise, we account for these investments using the equity method.

	Ownership Interest at June 30, 2012	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
NGL Pipelines & Services:
Venice Energy Service Company, L.L.C.	13.1%	$	31.1	$	35.5
K/D/S Promix, L.L.C.	50%		40.9		40.7
Baton Rouge Fractionators LLC	32.2%		20.6		21.0
Skelly-Belvieu Pipeline Company, L.L.C.	50%		37.4		35.0
Texas Express Pipeline LLC (“Texas Express”)	35%		39.2		13.9
Texas Express Gathering LLC (“TEG”) (1)	45%		8.9		--
Front Range Pipeline LLC (“Front Range”)	33.3%		6.3		--
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services:
Evangeline (2)	--		--		4.4
White River Hub, LLC	50%		25.5		25.7
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services:
Seaway Crude Pipeline LLC	50%		179.2		170.7
Offshore Pipelines & Services:
Poseidon Oil Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“Poseidon”)	36%		50.6		55.4
Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company	50%		218.2		222.8
Deepwater Gateway, L.L.C.	50%		93.7		94.6
Neptune Pipeline Company, L.L.C.	25.7		48.3		51.1
Southeast Keathley Canyon Pipeline Company L.L.C.	50%		51.7		1.0
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services:
Baton Rouge Propylene Concentrator, LLC	30%		8.9		9.5
Centennial Pipeline LLC (“Centennial”)	50%		49.4		51.8
Other (3)	Various		3.3		3.4
Other Investments:
Energy Transfer Equity (4)	--		--		1,023.1
Total		$	913.2	$	1,859.6

(1) In April 2012, we, along with Enbridge Midcoast Energy, LP (“Enbridge”) and WGR Asset Holding Company LLC formed a new joint venture, TEG, to design and construct two gas gathering systems to complement the Texas Express Pipeline. Enbridge will construct and operate the systems, which are expected to begin service in the second quarter of 2013. (2) In June 2012, we acquired the remaining ownership interests in Evangeline and it became a wholly owned subsidiary of ours. (3) Other unconsolidated affiliates include a 50% interest in a propylene pipeline extending from Mont Belvieu, Texas to La Porte, Texas and a 25% interest in a company that provides logistics communications solutions between petroleum pipelines and their customers. (4) We ceased using the equity method to account for our investment in Energy Transfer Equity limited partner units effective January 18, 2012 and began accounting for them as available-for-sale securities. We completed the sale of the remaining Energy Transfer Equity units in April 2012 (see below).

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents our equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates by business segment for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	3.8		$	6.2		$	9.0		$	12.1
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services		1.2			1.5			2.6			2.7
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		3.6			(1.6	)		4.1			(2.1	)
Offshore Pipelines & Services		4.1			6.6			11.0			14.9
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		(1.4	)		(4.3	)		(7.9	)		(9.3	)
Other Investments (1)		--			2.7			2.4			9.0
Total	$	11.3		$	11.1		$	21.2		$	27.3

(1) With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, the amount presented reflects our equity in the income of Energy Transfer Equity from January 1, 2012 to January 18, 2012.

The following table presents unamortized excess cost amounts by business segment at the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	24.2	$	24.7
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		18.9		19.2
Offshore Pipelines & Services		14.2		14.8
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		2.8		2.9
Other Investments (1)		--		1,119.0
Total	$	60.1	$	1,180.6

(1) On January 18, 2012, we discontinued using the equity method to account for our investment in Energy Transfer Equity common units and began accounting for this investment as an available-for-sale security. As a result, we no longer recognized any excess cost amounts associated with this investment.

The following table presents our amortization of excess cost amounts by business segment for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	0.3	$	0.2	$	0.5	$	0.5
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		0.1		0.2		0.3		0.4
Offshore Pipelines & Services		0.3		0.3		0.6		0.6
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		--		--		0.1		--
Other Investments (1)		--		8.4		0.3		17.5
Total	$	0.7	$	9.1	$	1.8	$	19.0

(1) Reflects amortization of excess cost amounts related to our investment in Energy Transfer Equity from January 1, 2012 through January 18, 2012, which is the date we ceased using the equity method to account for this investment.

Liquidation of Investment in Energy Transfer Equity

The Other Investments segment included our noncontrolling ownership interest in Energy Transfer Equity, which was accounted for using the equity method until January 18, 2012. We sold 4,450,000 Energy Transfer Equity common units during the second quarter of 2011 for net cash proceeds of $165.8 million and recorded a gain of $5.4 million on the sale. Since our ownership interest in Energy Transfer Equity exceeded 3% throughout calendar year 2011, we accounted for our investment in Energy Transfer Equity using the equity method and included gains on the sale of this asset in operating income. At December 31, 2011, we owned 29,303,514 common units of Energy Transfer Equity.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On January 18, 2012, we sold 22,762,636 of these common units in a private transaction, which generated cash proceeds of approximately $825.1 million and a gain on the sale of $27.5 million. Following completion of the January 18 transaction, our ownership interest in Energy Transfer Equity was below 3%, and we discontinued using the equity method to account for this investment and began accounting for it as an investment in available-for-sale equity securities. For the period January 1, 2012 to January 18, 2012, we recorded $2.4 million of equity earnings from Energy Transfer Equity, which is reflected in our Other Investments segment.

The remaining 6,540,878 units were sold systematically through April 27, 2012 until completely liquidated. These post-January 18 sales generated total cash proceeds of approximately $270.2 million and gains of $41.3 million. The aggregate $68.8 million in gains on the 2012 sales, of which $15.5 million are attributed to sales during the second quarter of 2012, are presented as a component of “Other income.” Proceeds from these sales were used for general company purposes, including funding capital expenditures.

All activities included in our sixth reportable business segment, Other Investments, ceased on January 18, 2012, which was the date we discontinued using the equity method to account for our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity. See Note 11 for additional information regarding our business segments.

Formation of Front Range Joint Venture

In April 2012, we, along with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and DCP Midstream, LLC formed a new joint venture, Front Range, to design and construct a new NGL pipeline that will originate in the Denver-Julesburg Basin (the “DJ Basin”) in Weld County, Colorado and extend approximately 435 miles to Skellytown in Carson County, Texas. Each party holds a one-third ownership interest in the joint venture. The Front Range Pipeline, with connections to our Mid-America Pipeline System and the Texas Express Pipeline, is expected to provide producers in the DJ Basin with access to the Gulf Coast, the largest NGL market in the U.S. Depending on shipper interest in a binding open commitment period that commenced in April 2012, initial capacity on the Front Range Pipeline is expected to be approximately 150 MBPD, which can be readily expanded to approximately 230 MBPD. We will construct and operate the pipeline, which is expected to begin service in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Summarized Income Statement Information of Unconsolidated Affiliates

The following table presents unaudited income statement information (on a 100% basis for the periods presented) of our unconsolidated affiliates, aggregated by the business segments to which they relate:

	Summarized Income Statement Information for the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012								June 30, 2011
	Revenues		Operating Income (Loss)			Net Income (Loss)			Revenues		Operating Income (Loss)			Net Income (Loss)
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	71.5	$	15.3		$	15.2		$	116.4	$	30.5		$	30.6
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services		2.9		1.9			1.9			54.7		2.7			2.7
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		21.5		7.4			7.3			9.6		(2.1	)		(2.1	)
Offshore Pipelines & Services		39.1		12.8			12.5			43.7		17.7			17.5
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		5.9		(0.3	)		(2.4	)		9.2		(5.4	)		(7.6	)
Other Investments		--		--			--			1,974.9		260.6			66.3

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Summarized Income Statement Information for the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2012								June 30, 2011
	Revenues		Operating Income (Loss)			Net Income (Loss)			Revenues		Operating Income			Net Income (Loss)
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	182.4	$	42.3		$	42.2		$	216.5	$	53.9		$	54.0
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services		5.7		3.7			3.7			90.2		5.3			5.3
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		33.8		8.2			8.1			20.8		(1.6	)		(1.6	)
Offshore Pipelines & Services		80.2		31.9			30.9			90.0		36.6			36.2
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		11.3		(9.7	)		(13.8	)		19.3		(12.4	)		(16.8	)
Other Investments		--		--			--			3,964.0		624.8			154.9

We discontinued using the equity method to account for our investment in Energy Transfer Equity common units on January 18, 2012 (see “Liquidation of Investment in Energy Transfer Equity” within this Note 7). As a result, income statement data for Energy Transfer Equity, which was presented within the Other Investments segment in the table above, is not presented for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, net income amounts presented for Energy Transfer Equity represents net income attributable to their partners.

Other

The credit agreements of Poseidon and Centennial restrict their ability to pay cash dividends if a default or event of default (as defined in each credit agreement) has occurred and is continuing at the time such payments are scheduled to be paid. These businesses were in compliance with the terms of their credit agreements at June 30, 2012.

Note 8. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Identifiable Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes our intangible assets by business segment at the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2012							December 31, 2011
	Gross Value		Accum. Amort.			Carrying Value		Gross Value		Accum. Amort.			Carrying Value
NGL Pipelines & Services:
Customer relationship intangibles	$	340.8	$	(138.0	)	$	202.8	$	340.8	$	(128.2	)	$	212.6
Contract-based intangibles		284.7		(147.1	)		137.6		298.4		(169.7	)		128.7
Segment total		625.5		(285.1	)		340.4		639.2		(297.9	)		341.3
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services:
Customer relationship intangibles		1,163.6		(230.5	)		933.1		1,163.6		(209.7	)		953.9
Contract-based intangibles		468.3		(301.7	)		166.6		464.8		(290.9	)		173.9
Segment total		1,631.9		(532.2	)		1,099.7		1,628.4		(500.6	)		1,127.8
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services:
Customer relationship intangibles		9.7		(4.4	)		5.3		9.7		(4.1	)		5.6
Contract-based intangibles		0.4		(0.2	)		0.2		0.4		(0.2	)		0.2
Segment total		10.1		(4.6	)		5.5		10.1		(4.3	)		5.8
Offshore Pipelines & Services:
Customer relationship intangibles		205.8		(134.3	)		71.5		205.8		(129.2	)		76.6
Contract-based intangibles		1.2		(0.4	)		0.8		1.2		(0.3	)		0.9
Segment total		207.0		(134.7	)		72.3		207.0		(129.5	)		77.5
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services:
Customer relationship intangibles		104.3		(30.9	)		73.4		104.3		(28.4	)		75.9
Contract-based intangibles		59.7		(31.8	)		27.9		57.6		(29.7	)		27.9
Segment total		164.0		(62.7	)		101.3		161.9		(58.1	)		103.8
Total all segments	$	2,638.5	$	(1,019.3	)	$	1,619.2	$	2,646.6	$	(990.4	)	$	1,656.2

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents the amortization expense of our intangible assets by business segment for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	9.6	$	10.0	$	19.8	$	20.4
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services		15.8		20.2		31.6		40.1
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		0.1		0.1		0.3		0.2
Offshore Pipelines & Services		2.6		2.8		5.2		5.8
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		3.2		4.3		6.7		8.6
Total	$	31.3	$	37.4	$	63.6	$	75.1

The following table presents our forecast of amortization expense associated with existing intangible assets for the periods indicated:

Remainder of 2012				2013				2014				2015				2016
$	60.0			$	111.6			$	107.1			$	106.6			$	107.8

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction. There have been no changes to our goodwill amounts since those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 9. Debt Obligations

The following table presents our consolidated debt obligations (arranged by company and maturity date) at the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
EPO senior debt obligations:
Senior Notes S, 7.625% fixed-rate, due February 2012	$	--		$	490.5
Senior Notes P, 4.60% fixed-rate, due August 2012		500.0			500.0
Senior Notes C, 6.375% fixed-rate, due February 2013		350.0			350.0
Senior Notes T, 6.125% fixed-rate, due February 2013		182.5			182.5
Senior Notes M, 5.65% fixed-rate, due April 2013		400.0			400.0
Senior Notes U, 5.90% fixed-rate, due April 2013		237.6			237.6
Senior Notes O, 9.75% fixed-rate, due January 2014		500.0			500.0
Senior Notes G, 5.60% fixed-rate, due October 2014		650.0			650.0
Senior Notes I, 5.00% fixed-rate, due March 2015		250.0			250.0
Senior Notes X, 3.70% fixed-rate, due June 2015		400.0			400.0
Senior Notes AA, 3.20% fixed-rate, due February 2016		750.0			750.0
$3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility, variable-rate, due September 2016		427.0			150.0
Senior Notes L, 6.30% fixed-rate, due September 2017		800.0			800.0
Senior Notes V, 6.65% fixed-rate, due April 2018		349.7			349.7
Senior Notes N, 6.50% fixed-rate, due January 2019		700.0			700.0
Senior Notes Q, 5.25% fixed-rate, due January 2020		500.0			500.0
Senior Notes Y, 5.20% fixed-rate, due September 2020		1,000.0			1,000.0
Senior Notes CC, 4.05% fixed-rate, due February 2022		650.0			650.0
Senior Notes D, 6.875% fixed-rate, due March 2033		500.0			500.0
Senior Notes H, 6.65% fixed-rate, due October 2034		350.0			350.0
Senior Notes J, 5.75% fixed-rate, due March 2035		250.0			250.0
Senior Notes W, 7.55% fixed-rate, due April 2038		399.6			399.6
Senior Notes R, 6.125% fixed-rate, due October 2039		600.0			600.0
Senior Notes Z, 6.45% fixed-rate, due September 2040		600.0			600.0
Senior Notes BB, 5.95% fixed-rate, due February 2041		750.0			750.0
Senior Notes DD, 5.70% fixed-rate, due February 2042		600.0			600.0
Senior Notes EE, 4.85% fixed-rate, due August 2042		750.0			--
TEPPCO senior debt obligations:
TEPPCO Senior Notes, 7.625% fixed-rate, due February 2012		--			9.5
TEPPCO Senior Notes, 6.125% fixed-rate, due February 2013		17.5			17.5
TEPPCO Senior Notes, 5.90% fixed-rate, due April 2013		12.4			12.4
TEPPCO Senior Notes, 6.65% fixed-rate, due April 2018		0.3			0.3
TEPPCO Senior Notes, 7.55% fixed-rate, due April 2038		0.4			0.4
Total principal amount of senior debt obligations		13,477.0			12,950.0
EPO Junior Subordinated Notes A, fixed/variable-rate, due August 2066		550.0			550.0
EPO Junior Subordinated Notes C, fixed/variable-rate, due June 2067		285.8			285.8
EPO Junior Subordinated Notes B, fixed/variable-rate, due January 2068		682.7			682.7
TEPPCO Junior Subordinated Notes, fixed/variable-rate, due June 2067		14.2			14.2
Total principal amount of senior and junior debt obligations		15,009.7			14,482.7
Other, non-principal amounts:
Change in fair value of debt hedged in fair value hedging relationship (1)		39.7			73.8
Unamortized discounts, net of premiums		(32.6	)		(30.0	)
Unamortized deferred net gains related to terminated interest rate swaps (1)		29.9			2.9
Total other, non-principal amounts		37.0			46.7
Less current maturities of debt (2)		(1,700.0	)		(500.0	)
Total long-term debt	$	13,346.7		$	14,029.4

(1) See Note 4 for information regarding our interest rate hedging activities. (2) We expect to refinance the current maturities of our debt obligations prior to their maturity.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents contractually scheduled maturities of our consolidated debt obligations outstanding at June 30, 2012 for the next five years, and in total thereafter:

			Scheduled Maturities of Debt
	Total		Remainder of 2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		After 2016
Revolving Credit Facility	$	427.0	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	--	$	427.0	$	--
Senior Notes		13,050.0		500.0		1,200.0		1,150.0		650.0		750.0		8,800.0
Junior Subordinated Notes		1,532.7		--		--		--		--		--		1,532.7
Total	$	15,009.7	$	500.0	$	1,200.0	$	1,150.0	$	650.0	$	1,177.0	$	10,332.7

Apart from that discussed below and routine fluctuations in the balance of our revolving credit facility, there have been no significant changes in the terms or amounts of our consolidated debt obligations since those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K.

Issuance of Senior Notes EE in February 2012

In February 2012, EPO issued $750.0 million in principal amount of 30-year unsecured Senior Notes EE at 99.542% of their principal amount. Senior Notes EE have a fixed interest rate of 4.85% and mature on August 15, 2042. Enterprise guarantees the notes through an unconditional guarantee on an unsecured and unsubordinated basis. Net proceeds from the issuance of Senior Notes EE were used to repay outstanding amounts on the maturity of our $490.5 million principal amount of Senior Notes S due February 2012 and our $9.5 million principal amount of TEPPCO Senior Notes due February 2012 and for general company purposes.

Senior Notes EE rank equal with EPO’s existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. They are senior to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness of EPO. Senior Notes EE are subject to make-whole redemption rights and were issued under indentures containing certain covenants, which generally restrict EPO’s ability, with certain exceptions, to incur debt secured by liens and engage in sale and leaseback transactions.

In August 2012, EPO agreed to issue $650 million in principal amount of Senior Notes FF and $1.1 billion in principal amount of Senior Notes GG. See Note 18 for information regarding this subsequent event.

Commercial Paper Program

On August 8, 2012, EPO established a commercial paper program, under which EPO may issue up to $2.0 billion of short-term commercial paper notes outstanding at any time. See Note 18 for information regarding this subsequent event.

Letters of Credit

At June 30, 2012, EPO had $77.5 million in letters of credit outstanding related to its commodity derivative instruments. These letters of credit do not reduce the amount available for borrowing under EPO’s $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility.

Parent-Subsidiary Guarantor Relationships

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. acts as guarantor of the consolidated debt obligations of EPO with the exception of the remaining debt obligations of TEPPCO. If EPO were to default on any of its guaranteed debt, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. would be responsible for full and unconditional repayment of that obligation.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Lender Financial Covenants

We were in compliance with the financial covenants of our consolidated debt agreements at June 30, 2012.

Information Regarding Variable Interest Rates Paid

The following table presents the range of interest rates and weighted-average interest rates paid on our consolidated variable-rate debt obligation during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Range of Interest Rates Paid	Weighted-Average Interest Rate Paid
EPO $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility	1.54% to 3.63%	1.61%

Note 10. Equity and Distributions

Partners’ equity reflects the various classes of limited partner interests (common units, including restricted common units, and Class B units) that we have outstanding. The following table summarizes changes in the number of our units outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

	Common Units			Class B Units		Treasury Units
Number of units outstanding at December 31, 2011		881,620,418			4,520,431		--
Common units issued in connection with DRIP and EUPP		1,270,609			--		--
Common units issued in connection with equity-based awards		214,492			--		--
Restricted common unit awards issued		1,538,438			--		--
Forfeiture of restricted common unit awards		(95,575	)		--		--
Acquisition of treasury units in connection with vesting of equity-based awards		(373,391	)		--		373,391
Cancellation of treasury units		--			--		(373,391	)
Number of units outstanding at June 30, 2012		884,174,991			4,520,431		--

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 1,236,352 restricted common unit awards held by EPCO employees vested and converted to common units. Of this amount, 373,391 common units were sold back to us by the recipients to cover related withholding tax requirements. We cancelled such treasury units immediately upon acquisition.

We may issue additional equity or debt securities to assist us in meeting our future liquidity and capital spending requirements. We have a universal shelf registration statement (the “2010 Shelf”) on file with the SEC. The 2010 Shelf allows Enterprise and EPO (on a standalone basis) to issue an unlimited amount of equity and debt securities, respectively. EPO utilized the 2010 Shelf to issue its Senior Notes EE in February 2012 (see Note 9) and will use the 2010 Shelf to issue additional senior notes in August 2012 (see Note 18).

In May 2012, we entered into an equity distribution agreement with certain broker-dealers pursuant to which we may offer and sell up to $1.0 billion of our common units in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of such offerings. Pursuant to this “at-the-market” program, we may sell common units under the agreement from time-to-time by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions through the NYSE at market prices, in block transactions or as otherwise agreed to with the broker-dealer parties to the agreement. A registration statement covering the issuance of common units pursuant to this agreement was filed with the SEC in March 2012. There were no issuances and sales under this agreement as of June 30, 2012.

We also have registration statements on file with the SEC collectively authorizing the issuance of up to 70,000,000 of our common units in connection with a distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”). The DRIP provides unitholders of record and beneficial owners of our common units a voluntary means by which they can increase the number of our common units they own by reinvesting the quarterly cash

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

distributions they would otherwise receive from us into the purchase of additional common units. After taking into account the number of common units issued under the DRIP through June 30, 2012, we may issue an additional 24,974,588 common units under this plan. A total of 1,198,552 common units were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2012 under our DRIP, which generated net cash proceeds of $58.0 million.

In addition to the DRIP, we have a registration statement on file with the SEC authorizing the issuance of up to 440,879 of our common units in connection with an employee unit purchase plan (“EUPP”). After taking into account the number of common units issued under the EUPP through June 30, 2012, we may issue an additional 358,791 common units under this plan. A total of 72,057 common units were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2012 under our EUPP, which generated net cash proceeds of $3.7 million.

The net cash proceeds we received from the DRIP and EUPP during the six months ended June 30, 2012 were used to temporarily reduce borrowings outstanding under EPO’s revolving credit facility and for general company purposes.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) primarily reflects the effective portion of the gain or loss on derivative instruments designated and qualified as cash flow hedges. Gain or loss amounts related to cash flow hedges recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified to earnings in the same period(s) in which the underlying hedged forecasted transactions affect earnings. If it becomes probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, the related net gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is immediately reclassified into earnings.

The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as reported on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Commodity derivative instruments (1)	$	60.2		$	(21.4	)
Interest rate derivative instruments (1)		(377.7	)		(329.0	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment (2)		1.7			1.7
Pension and postretirement benefit plans		(2.9	)		(1.7	)
Other		--			(1.0	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(318.7	)	$	(351.4	)

(1) See Note 4 for additional information regarding our derivative instruments. (2) Relates to transactions of a Canadian subsidiary.

Noncontrolling Interests

The following table presents additional information regarding noncontrolling interests as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Joint venture partners (1)	$	109.8	$	105.9
(1) Represents third party ownership interests in joint ventures that we consolidate, including Tri-States NGL Pipeline L.L.C., Independence Hub LLC, Rio Grande Pipeline Company and Wilprise Pipeline Company LLC.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents the components of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Former owners of Duncan Energy Partners	$	--	$	9.4	$	--	$	17.3
Joint venture partners		0.9		5.4		5.1		11.3
Total	$	0.9	$	14.8	$	5.1	$	28.6

Prior to completion of the Duncan Merger (see Note 1), we accounted for the former owners’ interest in Duncan Energy Partners as noncontrolling interest. Under this method of presentation, all pre-Duncan Merger revenues and expenses of Duncan Energy Partners are included in net income, and the former owners’ share of the income of Duncan Energy Partners is a component of “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” as reflected on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations.

The following table presents cash distributions paid to and cash contributions received from noncontrolling interests as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows and Statements of Consolidated Equity for the periods presented:

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests:
Former owners of Duncan Energy Partners	$	--	$	21.9
Joint venture partners		8.1		12.9
Total cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests	$	8.1	$	34.8

Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests:
Former owners of Duncan Energy Partners	$	--	$	1.5
Joint venture partners		5.9		1.1
Total cash contributions from noncontrolling interests	$	5.9	$	2.6

Cash distributions paid to the former owners of Duncan Energy Partners (prior to the Duncan Merger) represent the quarterly cash distributions paid to its unitholders. Similarly, cash contributions received from the former owners of Duncan Energy Partners (prior to the Duncan Merger) represent net cash proceeds received from the issuance of its limited partner units.

Cash Distributions

The following table presents our declared quarterly cash distribution rates with respect to the quarter indicated:

	Distribution Per Common Unit		Record Date	Payment Date
2012
1st Quarter	$	0.6275	04/30/12	05/09/12
2nd Quarter	$	0.6350	07/31/12	08/08/12

A privately held affiliate of EPCO has agreed to temporarily waive the regular quarterly cash distributions it would otherwise receive from us with respect to a certain number of our common units it owns (the “Designated Units”). The temporary distribution waiver remains in effect for five years following the closing date of the Holdings Merger, which was completed in November 2010. For the remaining term of the waiver agreement, the number of Designated Units is as follows for distributions paid or to be paid, if any, during the following calendar years: 26,130,000 during 2012; 23,700,000 during 2013; 22,560,000 during 2014; and 17,690,000 during 2015.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 11. Business Segments

We currently have five active reportable business segments: (i) NGL Pipelines & Services; (ii) Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services; (iii) Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services; (iv) Offshore Pipelines & Services; and (v) Petrochemical & Refined Products Services. Our business segments are generally organized and managed according to the type of services rendered (or technologies employed) and products produced and/or sold.

All activities included in our sixth reportable business segment, Other Investments, ceased on January 18, 2012, which was the date we discontinued using the equity method to account for our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity. See Note 7 for information regarding the liquidation of our investment in Energy Transfer Equity.

We evaluate segment performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of gross operating margin. Gross operating margin (either in total or by individual segment) is an important performance measure of the core profitability of our operations. This measure forms the basis of our internal financial reporting and is used by our management in deciding how to allocate capital resources among business segments. We believe that investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that our management uses in evaluating segment results. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to total segment gross operating margin is operating income. Our non-GAAP financial measure of total segment gross operating margin should not be considered an alternative to GAAP operating income.

We define total segment gross operating margin as operating income before: (i) depreciation, amortization and accretion expenses; (ii) non-cash asset impairment charges; (iii) operating lease expenses for which we did not have the payment obligation; (iv) gains and losses from asset sales and related transactions; and (v) general and administrative costs. Gross operating margin by segment is calculated by subtracting segment operating costs and expenses (net of the adjustments noted above) from segment revenues, with both segment totals before the elimination of intercompany transactions. In accordance with GAAP, intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Gross operating margin is exclusive of other income and expense transactions, income taxes, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles and extraordinary charges. Gross operating margin is presented on a 100% basis before any allocation of earnings to noncontrolling interests.

We include equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates in our measurement of segment gross operating margin and operating income. Equity investments with industry partners are a significant component of our business strategy. They are a means by which we conduct our operations to align our interests with those of customers and/or suppliers. This method of operation enables us to achieve favorable economies of scale relative to the level of investment and business risk assumed. Many of these businesses perform supporting or complementary roles to our other midstream business operations.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents our measurement of total segment gross operating margin for the periods indicated:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues	$	9,789.8		$	11,216.5		$	21,042.3		$	21,400.2
Less: Operating costs and expenses		(9,009.5	)		(10,533.3	)		(19,476.7	)		(20,070.4	)
Add: Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		11.3			11.1			21.2			27.3
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (1)		261.3			233.3			515.9			464.1
Non-cash asset impairment charges		9.1			--			14.5			--
Operating lease expenses paid by EPCO		--			0.1			--			0.3
Gains related to asset sales (2)		(1.3	)		(5.2	)		(3.8	)		(23.6	)
Gains related to property damage insurance recoveries (see Note 16)		(27.7	)		--			(27.7	)		--
Total segment gross operating margin	$	1,033.0		$	922.5		$	2,085.7		$	1,797.9

(1) Amount is a component of “Depreciation, amortization and accretion” as presented on the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. (2) Amounts presented for the second quarter of 2011 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 include $5.4 million of gains related to the sale of a portion of our previously held equity method investment in Energy Transfer Equity (see Note 7).

The following table presents a reconciliation of total segment gross operating margin to operating income and further to income before income taxes for the periods indicated:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Total segment gross operating margin	$	1,033.0		$	922.5		$	2,085.7		$	1,797.9
Adjustments to reconcile total segment gross operating margin to operating income:
Amounts included in operating costs and expenses:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		(261.3	)		(233.3	)		(515.9	)		(464.1	)
Non-cash asset impairment charges		(9.1	)		--			(14.5	)		--
Operating lease expenses paid by EPCO		--			(0.1	)		--			(0.3	)
Gains related to asset sales		1.3			5.2			3.8			23.6
Gains related to property damage insurance recoveries (see Note 16)		27.7			--			27.7			--
General and administrative costs		(42.5	)		(50.4	)		(88.8	)		(88.3	)
Operating income		749.1			643.9			1,498.0			1,268.8
Other expense, net		(173.4	)		(188.0	)		(301.2	)		(371.3	)
Income before income taxes	$	575.7		$	455.9		$	1,196.8		$	897.5

Table of Contents

Information by business segment, together with reconciliations to our consolidated financial statement totals, is presented in the following table:

	Reportable Business Segments
	NGL Pipelines & Services		Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services			Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services			Offshore Pipelines & Services		Petrochemical & Refined Products Services				Other Investments		Adjustments and Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Revenues from third parties:
Three months ended June 30, 2012	$	3,327.9		$	700.9	$	4,188.7		$	47.5		$	1,499.2		$	--	$	--		$	9,764.2
Three months ended June 30, 2011		3,960.1			862.5		4,281.6			61.1			1,907.0			--		--			11,072.3
Six months ended June 30, 2012		7,682.0			1,505.8		8,662.3			101.9			3,033.9			--		--			20,985.9
Six months ended June 30, 2011		8,015.5			1,734.2		7,652.2			121.7			3,482.3			--		--			21,005.9
Revenues from related parties:
Three months ended June 30, 2012		4.6			19.5		--			1.5			--			--		--			25.6
Three months ended June 30, 2011		76.8			64.8		--			2.6			--			--		--			144.2
Six months ended June 30, 2012		5.0			48.2		--			3.2			--			--		--			56.4
Six months ended June 30, 2011		278.2			109.7		--			6.4			--			--		--			394.3
Intersegment and intrasegment revenues:
Three months ended June 30, 2012		2,276.5			179.0		1,735.5			1.7			438.7			--		(4,631.4	)		--
Three months ended June 30, 2011		3,228.2			253.9		1,477.6			0.1			445.5			--		(5,405.3	)		--
Six months ended June 30, 2012		5,094.7			402.7		3,466.4			5.0			878.6			--		(9,847.4	)		--
Six months ended June 30, 2011		6,702.8			524.8		2,184.7			1.8			918.6			--		(10,332.7	)		--
Total revenues:
Three months ended June 30, 2012		5,609.0			899.4		5,924.2			50.7			1,937.9			--		(4,631.4	)		9,789.8
Three months ended June 30, 2011		7,265.1			1,181.2		5,759.2			63.8			2,352.5			--		(5,405.3	)		11,216.5
Six months ended June 30, 2012		12,781.7			1,956.7		12,128.7			110.1			3,912.5			--		(9,847.4	)		21,042.3
Six months ended June 30, 2011		14,996.5			2,368.7		9,836.9			129.9			4,400.9			--		(10,332.7	)		21,400.2
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates:
Three months ended June 30, 2012		3.8			1.2		3.6			4.1			(1.4	)		--		--			11.3
Three months ended June 30, 2011		6.2			1.5		(1.6	)		6.6			(4.3	)		2.7		--			11.1
Six months ended June 30, 2012		9.0			2.6		4.1			11.0			(7.9	)		2.4		--			21.2
Six months ended June 30, 2011		12.1			2.7		(2.1	)		14.9			(9.3	)		9.0		--			27.3
Gross operating margin:
Three months ended June 30, 2012		565.8			175.8		95.8			38.3			157.3			--		--			1,033.0
Three months ended June 30, 2011		497.7			161.1		67.8			53.4			139.8			2.7		--			922.5
Six months ended June 30, 2012		1,220.7			382.0		135.1			90.4			255.1			2.4		--			2,085.7
Six months ended June 30, 2011		1,002.1			320.3		99.6			114.7			252.2			9.0		--			1,797.9
Segment assets:
At June 30, 2012		8,534.7			10,419.1		1,315.5			2,001.9			3,838.4			--		2,275.7			28,385.3
At December 31, 2011		7,966.4			9,949.6		944.6			2,000.9			3,769.5			1,023.1		2,145.6			27,799.7
Property, plant and equipment, net: (see Note 6)
At June 30, 2012		7,668.7			8,997.6		819.6			1,385.0			2,614.0			--		2,275.7			23,760.6
At December 31, 2011		7,137.8			8,495.4		456.9			1,416.4			2,539.5			--		2,145.6			22,191.6
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates: (see Note 7)
At June 30, 2012		184.4			25.5		179.2			462.5			61.6			--		--			913.2
At December 31, 2011		146.1			30.1		170.7			424.9			64.7			1,023.1		--			1,859.6
Intangible assets, net: (see Note 8)
At June 30, 2012		340.4			1,099.7		5.5			72.3			101.3			--		--			1,619.2
At December 31, 2011		341.3			1,127.8		5.8			77.5			103.8			--		--			1,656.2
Goodwill: (see Note 8)
At June 30, 2012		341.2			296.3		311.2			82.1			1,061.5			--		--			2,092.3
At December 31, 2011		341.2			296.3		311.2			82.1			1,061.5			--		--			2,092.3

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents additional information regarding our consolidated revenues and costs and expenses for the periods indicated:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
NGL Pipelines & Services:
Sales of NGLs and related products	$	3,133.9		$	3,832.2		$	7,249.2		$	7,889.9
Midstream services		198.6			204.7			437.8			403.8
Total		3,332.5			4,036.9			7,687.0			8,293.7
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services:
Sales of natural gas		510.8			719.5			1,083.4			1,432.2
Midstream services		209.6			207.8			470.6			411.7
Total		720.4			927.3			1,554.0			1,843.9
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services:
Sales of crude oil		4,174.0			4,257.9			8,621.6			7,606.1
Midstream services		14.7			23.7			40.7			46.1
Total		4,188.7			4,281.6			8,662.3			7,652.2
Offshore Pipelines & Services:
Sales of natural gas		--			0.3			0.1			0.6
Sales of crude oil		--			2.5			1.4			5.8
Midstream services		49.0			60.9			103.6			121.7
Total		49.0			63.7			105.1			128.1
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services:
Sales of petrochemicals and refined products		1,316.8			1,718.7			2,668.0			3,101.5
Midstream services		182.4			188.3			365.9			380.8
Total		1,499.2			1,907.0			3,033.9			3,482.3
Total consolidated revenues	$	9,789.8		$	11,216.5		$	21,042.3		$	21,400.2

Consolidated costs and expenses
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales	$	8,195.2		$	9,790.3		$	17,861.0		$	18,609.6
Other operating costs and expenses (1)		572.9			514.9			1,116.8			1,020.3
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		261.3			233.3			515.9			464.1
Gains related to asset sales		(1.3	)		(5.2	)		(3.8	)		(23.6	)
Gains related to property damage insurance recoveries		(27.7	)		--			(27.7	)		--
Non-cash asset impairment charges		9.1			--			14.5			--
General and administrative costs		42.5			50.4			88.8			88.3
Total consolidated costs and expenses	$	9,052.0		$	10,583.7		$	19,565.5		$	20,158.7

(1) Represents cost of operating our plants, pipelines and other fixed assets, excluding non-cash depreciation, amortization and accretion charges.

Period-to-period fluctuations in our product sales revenues and related cost of sales amounts are explained in part by changes in energy commodity prices. In general, lower energy commodity prices result in a decrease in our revenues attributable to product sales; however, these lower commodity prices also decrease the associated cost of sales as purchase costs decline.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 12. Related Party Transactions

The following table summarizes our related party transactions for the periods presented:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues – related parties:
Energy Transfer Equity and subsidiaries	$	--	$	86.7	$	--	$	296.9
Other unconsolidated affiliates		25.6		57.5		56.4		97.4
Total revenue – related parties	$	25.6	$	144.2	$	56.4	$	394.3
Costs and expenses – related parties:
EPCO and affiliates	$	240.1	$	192.4	$	406.1	$	365.4
Energy Transfer Equity and subsidiaries		--		223.0		--		490.4
Other unconsolidated affiliates		7.2		11.4		12.3		21.6
Total costs and expenses – related parties	$	247.3	$	426.8	$	418.4	$	877.4

Energy Transfer Equity was a related party to us during the period in which we accounted for our investment in its limited partner units using the equity method of accounting. We ceased reporting Energy Transfer Equity as a related party in January 2012. See Note 7 for information regarding the liquidation of our investment in Energy Transfer Equity.

The following table summarizes our related party accounts receivable and accounts payable amounts at the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Accounts receivable - related parties:
Energy Transfer Equity and subsidiaries	$	--	$	28.4
Other unconsolidated affiliates		2.3		15.1
Total accounts receivable – related parties	$	2.3	$	43.5

Accounts payable - related parties:
EPCO and affiliates	$	61.8	$	108.3
Energy Transfer Equity and subsidiaries		--		92.6
Other unconsolidated affiliates		8.4		10.7
Total accounts payable – related parties	$	70.2	$	211.6

We believe that the terms and provisions of our related party agreements are fair to us; however, such agreements and transactions may not be as favorable to us as we could have obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Relationship with EPCO and Affiliates

We have an extensive and ongoing relationship with EPCO and its privately held affiliates (including Enterprise GP, our sole general partner), which are not a part of our consolidated group of companies.

EPCO is a privately held company controlled collectively by the EPCO Trustees. At June 30, 2012, EPCO and its privately held affiliates (including Dan Duncan LLC and two Duncan family trusts, the beneficiaries of which include the estate of Mr. Duncan) beneficially owned the following limited partner interests in us:

Number of Units	Percentage of Total Units Outstanding
338,930,881 (1)	38.1%
(1) Includes 4,520,431 Class B units.

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dan Duncan LLC owns 100% of our general partner, Enterprise GP.

We and Enterprise GP are both separate legal entities apart from each other and apart from EPCO and its other affiliates, with assets and liabilities that are also separate from those of EPCO and its other affiliates. EPCO and its privately held affiliates depend on the cash distributions they receive from us and other investments to fund their other operations and to meet their debt obligations. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we paid EPCO and its privately held affiliates cash distributions of $369.6 million and $346.4 million, respectively.

We have no employees. All of our operating functions and general and administrative support services are provided by employees of EPCO pursuant to the ASA or by other service providers. The following table presents costs and expenses related to the ASA and other EPCO transactions for the periods indicated:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Operating costs and expenses	$	213.6	$	157.9	$	356.3	$	305.3
General and administrative expenses		26.5		34.5		49.8		60.1
Total costs and expenses	$	240.1	$	192.4	$	406.1	$	365.4

Note 13. Earnings Per Unit

Basic earnings per unit is computed by dividing net income or loss attributable to our limited partners by the weighted-average number of our distribution-bearing units outstanding during a period, which excludes the Designated Units (see Note 10) to the extent that such units do not participate in the distributions to be paid with respect to such period.

Diluted earnings per unit is computed by dividing net income or loss attributable to our limited partners by the sum of (i) the weighted-average number of our distribution-bearing units outstanding during a period (as used in determining basic earnings per unit), (ii) the weighted-average number of our Class B units outstanding during a period, (iii) the weighted-average number of Designated Units outstanding during a period and (iv) the number of incremental common units resulting from the assumed exercise of dilutive unit options outstanding during a period (the “incremental option units”).

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents our calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the periods indicated:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
BASIC EARNINGS PER UNIT
Numerator:
Net income attributable to limited partners	$	566.3	$	433.7	$	1,217.6	$	854.4
Denominator:
Weighted-average number of:
Distribution-bearing common units outstanding		857.9		815.1		857.3		814.5
Basic earnings per unit:
Net income attributable to limited partners	$	0.66	$	0.53	$	1.42	$	1.05
DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT
Numerator:
Net income attributable to limited partners	$	566.3	$	433.7	$	1,217.6	$	854.4
Denominator:
Weighted-average number of:
Distribution-bearing common units outstanding		857.9		815.1		857.3		814.5
Class B units		4.5		4.5		4.5		4.5
Designated Units (see Note 10)		26.1		30.6		26.1		30.6
Incremental option units		1.4		1.2		1.4		1.3
Total		889.9		851.4		889.3		850.9
Diluted earnings per unit:
Net income attributable to limited partners	$	0.64	$	0.51	$	1.37	$	1.00

Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies

As part of our normal business activities, we may be named as defendants in legal proceedings, including those arising from regulatory and environmental matters. Although we are insured against various risks to the extent we believe it is prudent, there is no assurance that the nature and amount of such insurance will be adequate, in every case, to fully indemnify us against losses arising from future legal proceedings. We will vigorously defend the partnership in litigation matters.

Management has regular quarterly litigation reviews, including updates from legal counsel, to assess the possible need for accounting recognition and disclosure of these contingencies. We accrue an undiscounted liability for those contingencies where the loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum amount in the range is accrued.

We do not record a contingent liability when the likelihood of loss is probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when the likelihood of loss is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. For contingencies where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and the impact would be material to our consolidated financial statements, we disclose the nature of the contingency and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. Based on a consideration of all relevant known facts and circumstances, we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of any currently pending litigation directed against us will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements either individually at the claim level or in the aggregate.

At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our accruals for litigation contingencies were $16.2 million and $16.5 million, respectively, and were recorded in our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Other current liabilities.” Our accruals for litigation contingencies are recorded on an undiscounted basis. Our evaluation of litigation contingencies is based on the facts and circumstances of each case and predicting the outcome of these matters involves uncertainties. In the event

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

the assumptions we use to evaluate these matters change in future periods or new information becomes available, we may be required to record additional accruals. In an effort to mitigate expenses associated with litigation, we may settle legal proceedings out of court.

Contractual Obligations

Scheduled Maturities of Long-Term Debt. With the exception of (i) routine fluctuations in the balance of our revolving credit facility, (ii) the issuance of Senior Notes EE in February 2012 and (iii) the repayment of Senior Notes S and TEPPCO Senior Notes in February 2012, there have been no significant changes in our consolidated debt obligations since those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K. See Note 9 for additional information regarding our consolidated debt obligations.

Operating Lease Obligations. Consolidated lease and rental expense was $22.7 million and $21.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, consolidated lease and rental expense was $45.1 million and $42.0 million, respectively. There have been no material changes in our operating lease commitments since those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K.

Purchase Obligations. There have been no material changes in our consolidated purchase obligations since those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K.

Other Claims

As part of our normal business activities with joint venture partners and certain customers and suppliers, we occasionally make claims against such parties or have claims made against us as a result of disputes related to contractual agreements or similar arrangements. As of June 30, 2012, our contingent claims against such parties were approximately $39.1 million and claims against us were approximately $42.1 million. These matters are in various stages of assessment and the ultimate outcome of such disputes cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. With respect to claims against us, we believe that the likelihood of a material loss resulting from such claims is remote. Accordingly, no accruals for loss contingencies related to these matters have been recorded.

Note 15. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The following table presents the net effect of changes in our operating accounts for the periods indicated:

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Decrease (increase) in:
Accounts receivable – trade	$	785.5		$	(474.2	)
Accounts receivable – related parties		35.7			(0.2	)
Inventories		(20.8	)		266.5
Prepaid and other current assets		(13.9	)		(55.8	)
Other assets		(53.7	)		(34.2	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable – trade		(45.7	)		110.9
Accounts payable – related parties		(141.3	)		49.9
Accrued product payables		(880.2	)		479.0
Accrued interest		1.0			18.1
Other current liabilities		84.1			(10.4	)
Other liabilities		(31.0	)		11.8
Net effect of changes in operating accounts	$	(280.3	)	$	361.4

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We incurred liabilities for construction in progress that had not been paid at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 of $289.8 million and $286.9 million, respectively. Such amounts are not included under the caption “Capital expenditures” on the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

On certain of our capital projects, third parties are obligated to reimburse us for all or a portion of project expenditures. The majority of such arrangements are associated with projects related to pipeline construction and production well tie-ins. These cash receipts are presented as “Contributions in aid of construction costs” within the investing activities section of our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.

Proceeds from asset sales increased $878.5 million period-to-period, primarily from the sale of 29,303,514 common units of Energy Transfer Equity during 2012. See Note 7 for information regarding the liquidation of our investment in Energy Transfer Equity.

See Note 16 for information regarding the collection of $27.7 million of nonrefundable property damage insurance proceeds during the second quarter of 2012.

See Note 10 for information regarding cash amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Note 16. Insurance Matters

We participate as a named insured in EPCO’s insurance program, which provides us with property damage, business interruption and other insurance coverage, the scope and amounts of which we believe are customary and prudent for the nature and extent of our operations. While we believe EPCO maintains adequate insurance coverage on our behalf, insurance may not fully cover every type of damage, interruption or other loss that might occur. If we were to incur a significant loss for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, there may be timing differences between amounts we accrue related to property damage expense, amounts we are required to pay in connection with a loss and amounts we subsequently receive from insurance carriers as reimbursements. Any event that materially interrupts the revenues generated by our consolidated operations, or other losses that require us to make material expenditures not reimbursed by insurance, could reduce our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders and, accordingly, adversely affect the market price of our common units.

Involuntary conversions result from the loss of an asset because of some unforeseen event (e.g., destruction due to fire). Some of these events are insurable, thus resulting in a property damage insurance recovery. Amounts we receive from insurance carriers are net of any deductibles related to the covered event. EPCO renewed its annual insurance programs during the second quarter of 2012. Under terms of the renewed policies,EPCO’s deductibles for property damage claims now range from $5.0 million to $60.0 million depending on the nature of the loss (windstorm or non-windstorm) and the assets involved (onshore or offshore). We continue to maintain business interruption coverage for our onshore and offshore assets, except for those situations involving windstorm-related downtime for our offshore assets.

After performing a cost-benefit analysis, management elected to forego windstorm coverage for our Gulf of Mexico offshore assets. The combination of increasingly high deductibles and premiums resulted in such coverage being uneconomic to us; therefore, we chose to self-insure such operations for the current annual policy period. Although the new EPCO policies do not provide any windstorm coverage for offshore assets, producers affiliated with our Independence Hub and Marco Polo platforms provide physical damage windstorm coverage of approximately $350.0 million for each of these key offshore assets.

During the second quarter of 2012, we collected $27.7 million of nonrefundable cash proceeds from insurance carriers that we recognized as a gain. These proceeds relate to property damage claims we made in connection with the February 2011 NGL release and fire at the West Storage location of our Mont

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Belvieu, Texas underground storage facility. As additional non-refundable insurance proceeds continue to be received, we expect to record gains equal to such proceeds.

Note 17. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

EPO conducts substantially all of our business. Currently, we have no independent operations and no material assets outside those of EPO.

EPO has issued publicly traded debt securities. Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as the parent company of EPO, guarantees the debt obligations of EPO, with the exception of the remaining debt obligations of TEPPCO. If EPO were to default on any of its guaranteed debt, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. would be responsible for full repayment of that obligation. EPO’s consolidated subsidiaries have no significant restrictions on their ability to pay distributions or make loans to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. See Note 9 for additional information regarding our consolidated debt obligations.

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

June 30, 2012

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)		Other Subsidiaries (Non-guarantor)		EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries		Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)			Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	28.1	$	34.3	$	(47.9	)	$	14.5	$	--		$	--		$	14.5
Accounts receivable – trade, net		1,151.8		2,579.7		(6.6	)		3,724.9		--			--			3,724.9
Accounts receivable – related parties		323.6		1,566.5		(1,871.6	)		18.5		(16.8	)		0.6			2.3
Inventories		766.4		127.6		(1.1	)		892.9		--			--			892.9
Prepaid and other current assets		181.9		267.4		(14.8	)		434.5		0.3			--			434.8
Total current assets		2,451.8		4,575.5		(1,942.0	)		5,085.3		(16.5	)		0.6			5,069.4
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,599.2		22,170.8		(9.4	)		23,760.6		--			--			23,760.6
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		26,978.9		1,483.2		(27,548.9	)		913.2		12,382.7			(12,382.7	)		913.2
Intangible assets, net		155.2		1,477.1		(13.1	)		1,619.2		--			--			1,619.2
Goodwill		458.9		1,633.4		--			2,092.3		--			--			2,092.3
Other assets		125.3		87.8		(0.8	)		212.3		0.1			--			212.4
Total assets	$	31,769.3	$	31,427.8	$	(29,514.2	)	$	33,682.9	$	12,366.3		$	(12,382.1	)	$	33,667.1

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of debt	$	1,670.1	$	29.9	$	--		$	1,700.0	$	--		$	--		$	1,700.0
Accounts payable – trade		245.1		565.4		(47.9	)		762.6		--			--			762.6
Accounts payable – related parties		1,778.4		158.0		(1,866.8	)		69.6		--			0.6			70.2
Accrued product payables		1,554.7		2,496.4		(11.4	)		4,039.7		--			--			4,039.7
Accrued interest		288.4		0.7		--			289.1		--			--			289.1
Other current liabilities		427.3		343.0		(13.7	)		756.6		--			0.1			756.7
Total current liabilities		5,964.0		3,593.4		(1,939.8	)		7,617.6		--			0.7			7,618.3
Long-term debt		13,331.8		14.9		--			13,346.7		--			--			13,346.7
Deferred tax liabilities		5.8		19.7		(0.8	)		24.7		--			(0.9	)		23.8
Other long-term liabilities		23.7		178.5		--			202.2		--			--			202.2
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Partners’ and other owners’ equity		12,444.0		27,544.1		(27,624.0	)		12,364.1		12,366.3			(12,364.1	)		12,366.3
Noncontrolling interests		--		77.2		50.4			127.6		--			(17.8	)		109.8
Total equity		12,444.0		27,621.3		(27,573.6	)		12,491.7		12,366.3			(12,381.9	)		12,476.1
Total liabilities and equity	$	31,769.3	$	31,427.8	$	(29,514.2	)	$	33,682.9	$	12,366.3		$	(12,382.1	)	$	33,667.1

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2011

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)		Other Subsidiaries (Non-guarantor)		EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries		Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)			Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	48.2	$	21.3	$	(11.2	)	$	58.3	$	--		$	--		$	58.3
Accounts receivable – trade, net		1,599.4		2,913.2		(10.8	)		4,501.8		--			--			4,501.8
Accounts receivable – related parties		141.1		2,155.5		(2,252.0	)		44.6		(1.1	)		--			43.5
Inventories		943.6		170.5		(2.4	)		1,111.7		--			--			1,111.7
Prepaid and other current assets		216.8		152.6		(16.0	)		353.4		--			--			353.4
Total current assets		2,949.1		5,413.1		(2,292.4	)		6,069.8		(1.1	)		--			6,068.7
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,477.5		20,723.7		(9.6	)		22,191.6		--			--			22,191.6
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		27,060.0		8,266.7		(33,467.1	)		1,859.6		12,114.5			(12,114.5	)		1,859.6
Intangible assets, net		142.4		1,527.4		(13.6	)		1,656.2		--			--			1,656.2
Goodwill		458.9		1,633.4		--			2,092.3		--			--			2,092.3
Other assets		146.4		107.5		2.8			256.7		--			--			256.7
Total assets	$	32,234.3	$	37,671.8	$	(35,779.9	)	$	34,126.2	$	12,113.4		$	(12,114.5	)	$	34,125.1

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of debt	$	500.0	$	--	$	--		$	500.0	$	--		$	--		$	500.0
Accounts payable – trade		205.6		578.6		(11.2	)		773.0		--			--			773.0
Accounts payable – related parties		2,407.2		71.9		(2,267.5	)		211.6		--			--			211.6
Accrued product payables		2,141.0		2,912.4		(6.3	)		5,047.1		--			--			5,047.1
Accrued interest		287.1		1.0		--			288.1		--			--			288.1
Other current liabilities		298.1		321.8		(7.4	)		612.5		--			0.1			612.6
Total current liabilities		5,839.0		3,885.7		(2,292.4	)		7,432.3		--			0.1			7,432.4
Long-term debt		13,975.1		54.3		--			14,029.4		--			--			14,029.4
Deferred tax liabilities		22.2		67.1		2.8			92.1		--			(0.9	)		91.2
Other long-term liabilities		155.3		197.5		--			352.8		--			--			352.8
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Partners’ and other owners’ equity		12,242.7		28,799.8		(28,946.4	)		12,096.1		12,113.4			(12,096.1	)		12,113.4
Noncontrolling interests		--		4,667.4		(4,543.9	)		123.5		--			(17.6	)		105.9
Total equity		12,242.7		33,467.2		(33,490.3	)		12,219.6		12,113.4			(12,113.7	)		12,219.3
Total liabilities and equity	$	32,234.3	$	37,671.8	$	(35,779.9	)	$	34,126.2	$	12,113.4		$	(12,114.5	)	$	34,125.1

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)			Other Subsidiaries (Non-guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Revenues	$	6,033.6		$	6,696.0		$	(2,939.8	)	$	9,789.8		$	--	$	--		$	9,789.8
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs and expenses		5,864.4			6,083.0			(2,937.9	)		9,009.5			--		--			9,009.5
General and administrative costs		9.1			32.6			--			41.7			0.8		--			42.5
Total costs and expenses		5,873.5			6,115.6			(2,937.9	)		9,051.2			0.8		--			9,052.0
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		598.8			(51.0	)		(536.5	)		11.3			567.1		(567.1	)		11.3
Operating income		758.9			529.4			(538.4	)		749.9			566.3		(567.1	)		749.1
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(185.7	)		(0.9	)		--			(186.6	)		--		--			(186.6	)
Other, net		--			13.2			--			13.2			--		--			13.2
Total other expense, net		(185.7	)		12.3			--			(173.4	)		--		--			(173.4	)
Income before income taxes		573.2			541.7			(538.4	)		576.5			566.3		(567.1	)		575.7
Provision for income taxes		(4.6	)		(3.7	)		--			(8.3	)		--		(0.2	)		(8.5	)
Net income		568.6			538.0			(538.4	)		568.2			566.3		(567.3	)		567.2
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		--			40.2			(41.7	)		(1.5	)		--		0.6			(0.9	)
Net income attributable to entity	$	568.6		$	578.2		$	(580.1	)	$	566.7		$	566.3	$	(566.7	)	$	566.3

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)			Other Subsidiaries (Non-guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Revenues	$	7,959.5		$	7,194.7		$	(3,937.7	)	$	11,216.5		$	--	$	--		$	11,216.5
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs and expenses		7,824.2			6,646.7			(3,937.6	)		10,533.3			--		--			10,533.3
General and administrative costs		3.4			43.8			--			47.2			3.2		--			50.4
Total costs and expenses		7,827.6			6,690.5			(3,937.6	)		10,580.5			3.2		--			10,583.7
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		492.8			24.9			(506.6	)		11.1			436.9		(436.9	)		11.1
Operating income		624.7			529.1			(506.7	)		647.1			433.7		(436.9	)		643.9
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(184.0	)		(6.2	)		1.9			(188.3	)		--		--			(188.3	)
Other, net		1.9			0.3			(1.9	)		0.3			--		--			0.3
Total other expense, net		(182.1	)		(5.9	)		--			(188.0	)		--		--			(188.0	)
Income before income taxes		442.6			523.2			(506.7	)		459.1			433.7		(436.9	)		455.9
Provision for income taxes		(5.7	)		(1.6	)		--			(7.3	)		--		(0.1	)		(7.4	)
Net income		436.9			521.6			(506.7	)		451.8			433.7		(437.0	)		448.5
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		--			(7.5	)		(7.5	)		(15.0	)		--		0.2			(14.8	)
Net income attributable to entity	$	436.9		$	514.1		$	(514.2	)	$	436.8		$	433.7	$	(436.8	)	$	433.7

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)			Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Revenues	$	13,673.4		$	13,854.5		$	(6,485.6	)	$	21,042.3		$	--	$	--		$	21,042.3
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs and expenses		13,274.2			12,686.6			(6,484.1	)		19,476.7			--		--			19,476.7
General and administrative costs		24.5			63.3			--			87.8			1.0		--			88.8
Total costs and expenses		13,298.7			12,749.9			(6,484.1	)		19,564.5			1.0		--			19,565.5
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		1,193.3			27.4			(1,199.5	)		21.2			1,218.6		(1,218.6	)		21.2
Operating income		1,568.0			1,132.0			(1,201.0	)		1,499.0			1,217.6		(1,218.6	)		1,498.0
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(371.3	)		(1.8	)		--			(373.1	)		--		--			(373.1	)
Other, net		0.1			71.8			--			71.9			--		--			71.9
Total other expense, net		(371.2	)		70.0			--			(301.2	)		--		--			(301.2	)
Income before income taxes		1,196.8			1,202.0			(1,201.0	)		1,197.8			1,217.6		(1,218.6	)		1,196.8
Benefit from income taxes		22.4			3.7			--			26.1			--		(0.2	)		25.9
Net income		1,219.2			1,205.7			(1,201.0	)		1,223.9			1,217.6		(1,218.8	)		1,222.7
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		--			(4.2	)		(2.0	)		(6.2	)		--		1.1			(5.1	)
Net income attributable to entity	$	1,219.2		$	1,201.5		$	(1,203.0	)	$	1,217.7		$	1,217.6	$	(1,217.7	)	$	1,217.6

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)			Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Revenues	$	16,284.3		$	13,273.4		$	(8,157.5	)	$	21,400.2		$	--	$	--		$	21,400.2
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs and expenses		16,002.4			12,225.3			(8,157.3	)		20,070.4			--		--			20,070.4
General and administrative costs		4.3			77.5			--			81.8			6.5		--			88.3
Total costs and expenses		16,006.7			12,302.8			(8,157.3	)		20,152.2			6.5		--			20,158.7
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		950.8			56.7			(980.2	)		27.3			860.9		(860.9	)		27.3
Operating income		1,228.4			1,027.3			(980.4	)		1,275.3			854.4		(860.9	)		1,268.8
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(363.0	)		(12.9	)		3.8			(372.1	)		--		--			(372.1	)
Other, net		3.9			0.7			(3.8	)		0.8			--		--			0.8
Total other expense, net		(359.1	)		(12.2	)		--			(371.3	)		--		--			(371.3	)
Income before income taxes		869.3			1,015.1			(980.4	)		904.0			854.4		(860.9	)		897.5
Provision for income taxes		(8.5	)		(5.9	)		--			(14.4	)		--		(0.1	)		(14.5	)
Net income		860.8			1,009.2			(980.4	)		889.6			854.4		(861.0	)		883.0
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests		--			(10.9	)		(18.2	)		(29.1	)		--		0.5			(28.6	)
Net income attributable to entity	$	860.8		$	998.3		$	(998.6	)	$	860.5		$	854.4	$	(860.5	)	$	854.4

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)		Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)		EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Comprehensive income	$	503.8	$	625.9	$	(538.4	)	$	591.3		$	589.4	$	(590.4	)	$	590.3
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		--		40.2		(41.7	)		(1.5	)		--		0.6			(0.9	)
Comprehensive income attributable to entity	$	503.8	$	666.1	$	(580.1	)	$	589.8		$	589.4	$	(589.8	)	$	589.4

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)		Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Comprehensive income	$	382.1	$	570.3		$	(506.7	)	$	445.7		$	427.6	$	(430.9	)	$	442.4
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		--		(7.5	)		(7.5	)		(15.0	)		--		0.2			(14.8	)
Comprehensive income attributable to entity	$	382.1	$	562.8		$	(514.2	)	$	430.7		$	427.6	$	(430.7	)	$	427.6

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)		Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Comprehensive income	$	1,183.6	$	1,274.0		$	(1,201.0	)	$	1,256.6		$	1,250.3	$	(1,251.5	)	$	1,255.4
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		--		(4.2	)		(2.0	)		(6.2	)		--		1.1			(5.1	)
Comprehensive income attributable to entity	$	1,183.6	$	1,269.8		$	(1,203.0	)	$	1,250.4		$	1,250.3	$	(1,250.4	)	$	1,250.3

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)		Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)		Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Comprehensive income	$	817.2	$	979.1		$	(980.4	)	$	815.9		$	780.7	$	(787.3	)	$	809.3
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		--		(10.9	)		(18.2	)		(29.1	)		--		0.5			(28.6	)
Comprehensive income attributable to entity	$	817.2	$	968.2		$	(998.6	)	$	786.8		$	780.7	$	(786.8	)	$	780.7

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)			Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)			Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,219.2		$	1,205.7		$	(1,201.0	)	$	1,223.9		$	1,217.6		$	(1,218.8	)	$	1,222.7
Reconciliation of net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		66.4			472.0			(0.7	)		537.7			--			--			537.7
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		(1,193.3	)		(27.4	)		1,199.5			(21.2	)		(1,218.6	)		1,218.6			(21.2	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates		1,589.2			40.0			(1,578.7	)		50.5			1,082.4			(1,082.4	)		50.5
Net effect of changes in operating accounts and other operating activities		(1,148.6	)		722.3			(34.5	)		(460.8	)		9.2			0.2			(451.4	)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		532.9			2,412.6			(1,615.4	)		1,330.1			1,090.6			(1,082.4	)		1,338.3
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures, net of contributions in aid of construction costs		(83.5	)		(1,719.6	)		--			(1,803.1	)		--			--			(1,803.1	)
Proceeds from asset sales		1,104.8			24.2			--			1,129.0			--			--			1,129.0
Other investing activities		(961.9	)		(54.2	)		940.4			(75.7	)		(60.4	)		60.4			(75.7	)
Cash used in investing activities		59.4			(1,749.6	)		940.4			(749.8	)		(60.4	)		60.4			(749.8	)
Financing activities:
Borrowings under debt agreements		2,414.6			--			--			2,414.6			--			--			2,414.6
Repayments of debt		(1,881.5	)		(9.5	)		--			(1,891.0	)		--			--			(1,891.0	)
Cash distributions paid to partners		(1,082.4	)		(1,586.9	)		1,586.9			(1,082.4	)		(1,068.6	)		1,082.4			(1,068.6	)
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests		--			--			(8.1	)		(8.1	)		--			--			(8.1	)
Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests		--			--			5.9			5.9			--			--			5.9
Net cash proceeds from issuance of common units		--			--			--			--			57.7			--			57.7
Cash contributions from owners		60.4			946.4			(946.4	)		60.4			--			(60.4	)		--
Other financing activities		(85.0	)		--			--			(85.0	)		(19.3	)		--			(104.3	)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(573.9	)		(650.0	)		638.3			(585.6	)		(1,030.2	)		1,022.0			(593.8	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		18.4			13.0			(36.7	)		(5.3	)		--			--			(5.3	)
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		9.7			21.3			(11.2	)		19.8			--			--			19.8
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	28.1		$	34.3		$	(47.9	)	$	14.5		$	--		$	--		$	14.5

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

	EPO and Subsidiaries
	Subsidiary Issuer (EPO)			Other Subsidiaries (Non- guarantor)			EPO and Subsidiaries Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated EPO and Subsidiaries			Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (Guarantor)			Eliminations and Adjustments			Consolidated Total
Operating activities:
Net income	$	860.8		$	1,009.2		$	(980.4	)	$	889.6		$	854.4		$	(861.0	)	$	883.0
Reconciliation of net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		56.6			428.9			(0.7	)		484.8			--			--			484.8
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		(950.8	)		(56.7	)		980.2			(27.3	)		(860.9	)		860.9			(27.3	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates		115.3			111.9			(142.4	)		84.8			979.8			(979.8	)		84.8
Net effect of changes in operating accounts and other operating activities		1,076.0			(383.2	)		(365.1	)		327.7			1.5			--			329.2
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		1,157.9			1,110.1			(508.4	)		1,759.6			974.8			(979.9	)		1,754.5
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures, net of contributions in aid of construction costs		(50.6	)		(1,659.2	)		--			(1,709.8	)		--			--			(1,709.8	)
Other investing activities		(466.5	)		231.9			452.2			217.6			(49.2	)		49.2			217.6
Cash used in investing activities		(517.1	)		(1,427.3	)		452.2			(1,492.2	)		(49.2	)		49.2			(1,492.2	)
Financing activities:
Borrowings under debt agreements		3,372.1			419.0			--			3,791.1			--			--			3,791.1
Repayments of debt		(2,976.0	)		(57.5	)		--			(3,033.5	)		--			--			(3,033.5	)
Cash distributions paid to partners		(979.8	)		(440.0	)		440.0			(979.8	)		(966.5	)		979.8			(966.5	)
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interests		--			(72.8	)		38.0			(34.8	)		--			--			(34.8	)
Cash contributions from noncontrolling interests		--			449.4			(446.6	)		2.8			--			(0.2	)		2.6
Net cash proceeds from issuance of common units		--			--			--			--			45.1			--			45.1
Cash contributions from owners		49.2			5.6			(5.6	)		49.2			--			(49.2	)		--
Other financing activities		(18.5	)		--			--			(18.5	)		(4.2	)		--			(22.7	)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(553.0	)		303.7			25.8			(223.5	)		(925.6	)		930.4			(218.7	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		87.8			(13.5	)		(30.4	)		43.9			--			(0.3	)		43.6
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		0.5			67.9			(2.9	)		65.5			--			--			65.5
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30	$	88.3		$	54.4		$	(33.3	)	$	109.4		$	--		$	(0.3	)	$	109.1

Table of Contents

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18. Subsequent Events

August 2012 Senior Notes Offering

On August 6, 2012, EPO agreed to issue $650 million in principal amount of 3-year unsecured Senior Notes FF at 99.941% of their principal amount and $1.1 billion in principal amount of 30-year unsecured Senior Notes GG at 99.470% of their principal amount. The transaction is scheduled to close on August 13, 2012. The Senior Notes FF to be issued upon closing will have a fixed interest rate of 1.25% and mature on August, 13, 2015, and the Senior Notes GG to be issued upon closing will have a fixed interest rate of 4.45% and mature on February 15, 2043. Enterprise has agreed to guarantee both such series of notes through an unconditional guarantee on an unsecured and unsubordinated basis. EPO expects to use net proceeds from the issuance of such notes to temporarily reduce borrowings under its $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility (which was used to repay amounts due upon the maturity of its $500.0 million principal amount of Senior Notes P on August 1, 2012) and for general company purposes.

Senior Notes FF and Senior Notes GG will rank equal with EPO’s existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. They will be senior to any existing and future subordinated indebtedness of EPO. Senior Notes FF and Senior Notes GG will be subject to make-whole redemption rights and will be issued under an indenture containing certain covenants, which generally restrict EPO’s ability, with certain exceptions, to incur debt secured by liens and engage in sale and leaseback transactions.

Commercial Paper Program

On August 8, 2012, EPO established a commercial paper program, under which EPO may issue up to $2.0 billion of short-term commercial paper notes outstanding at any time. The commercial paper notes will be senior unsecured obligations of EPO that are unconditionally guaranteed by Enterprise. We intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the commercial paper notes for general company purposes. The commercial paper program is fully backed by EPO’s existing $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility. As of the filing date of this quarterly report, EPO has not issued any commercial paper notes pursuant to this program.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

The following information should be read in conjunction with our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes, together with our discussion and analysis of financial position and results of operations, included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed on February 29, 2012 (the “2011 Form 10-K”). Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“U.S.”).

Key References Used in this Quarterly Report

In April 2011, we, our general partner, EPD MergerCo LLC (“Duncan MergerCo,” a Delaware limited liability company and our wholly owned subsidiary), Duncan Energy Partners L.P. (“Duncan Energy Partners”) and DEP Holdings, LLC (“DEP GP,” the general partner of Duncan Energy Partners) entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Duncan Merger Agreement”). In September 2011, the Duncan Merger Agreement was approved by the unitholders of Duncan Energy Partners and the merger of Duncan MergerCo with and into Duncan Energy Partners and related transactions were completed, with Duncan Energy Partners surviving such merger as our wholly owned subsidiary (collectively, we refer to these transactions as the “Duncan Merger”). Since we historically consolidated Duncan Energy Partners for financial reporting purposes, the Duncan Merger did not change the basis of presentation of our historical financial statements. For additional information regarding the Duncan Merger, see Note 1 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

References to “TEPPCO” mean TEPPCO Partners, L.P. prior to its merger with one of our subsidiaries in October 2009.

References to “Energy Transfer Equity” mean the business and operations of Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We sold our remaining limited partner interests in Energy Transfer Equity in April 2012.

Table of Contents

As generally used in the energy industry and in this quarterly report, the acronyms below have the following meanings:

/d	= per day	MMBbls	= million barrels
BBtus	= billion British thermal units	MMBPD	= million barrels per day
Bcf	= billion cubic feet	MMBtus	= million British thermal units
BPD	= barrels per day	MMcf	= million cubic feet
MBPD	= thousand barrels per day	TBtus	= trillion British thermal units

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This discussion contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on our beliefs and those of our general partner, as well as assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. When used in this document, words such as “anticipate,” “project,” “expect,” “plan,” “seek,” “goal,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “believe,” “may,” “potential” and similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and objectives for future operations are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we and our general partner believe that our expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can give any assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions as described in more detail under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” included in our 2011 Form 10-K. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this quarterly report speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by federal and state securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or any other reason.

Overview of Business

We are a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, the common units of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “EPD.” We were formed in April 1998 to own and operate certain natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) related businesses of EPCO and are now a leading North American provider of midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals. Our midstream energy asset network links producers of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil from some of the largest supply basins in the U.S., Canada and the Gulf of Mexico with domestic consumers and international markets. Our assets include approximately 50,700 miles of onshore and offshore pipelines; 190 MMBbls of storage capacity for NGLs, crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals; and 14 Bcf of working natural gas storage capacity.

Our integrated midstream energy operations include: natural gas gathering, treating, processing, transportation and storage; NGL transportation, fractionation, storage, and import and export terminals; crude oil and refined products transportation, storage, and terminals; offshore production platforms; petrochemical transportation and services; and a marine transportation business that operates primarily on the U.S. inland and Intracoastal Waterway systems and in the Gulf of Mexico. We currently have five active reportable business segments: (i) NGL Pipelines & Services; (ii) Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services; (iii) Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services; (iv) Offshore Pipelines & Services; and (v) Petrochemical & Refined Products Services. All activities included in our sixth reportable business segment, Other Investments, ceased on January 18, 2012, which was the date we discontinued using the equity method to account for our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity (see “Significant Recent Developments – Liquidation of Investment in Energy Transfer Equity” within this Item 2).

Table of Contents

For information regarding our business segments, see Note 11 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

We conduct substantially all of our business through EPO and are owned 100% by our limited partners from an economic perspective. Enterprise GP manages our partnership and owns a non-economic general partner interest in us.

Significant Recent Developments

The following information highlights significant developments since January 1, 2012 through the date of this filing (August 9, 2012), including (i) information relevant to an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operation; and (ii) certain unusual or infrequent events or transactions and known trends or uncertainties that have had or that we reasonably expect may have a material impact on our revenues or income from continuing operations.

Formation of Eagle Ford Shale Crude Oil Pipeline Joint Venture with Plains

On August 6, 2012, we announced the formation of a 50/50 joint venture with Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“Plains”) to provide crude oil pipeline services to producers in South Texas. The arrangement provides for Enterprise and Plains to consolidate certain portions of previously announced pipeline projects servicing the Eagle Ford Shale supply basin. The joint venture pipeline system is supported by long-term commitments totaling 210 MBPD of crude oil. The consolidation will provide shippers with increased market flexibility and enable Enterprise and Plains to optimize their respective capital investments in the area.

The joint venture will include a 140–mile crude oil and condensate line extending from Gardendale, Texas in LaSalle County to Three Rivers, Texas in Live Oak County and continuing on to Corpus Christi, Texas, and a new 35-mile pipeline segment from Three Rivers to our Lyssy, Texas station in Wilson County. The system, which is currently under construction, will have a targeted capacity of 350 MBPD and will include a marine terminal facility at Corpus Christi and 1.8 MMBbls of operational storage capacity across the system. Portions of the new system are expected to be placed into service in the fourth quarter of 2012, with the balance of the system expected to be placed into service in the first half of 2013. Plains will serve as operator of the joint venture’s pipeline system.

At Lyssy, the joint venture pipeline will interconnect with the Eagle Ford expansion of our South Texas Crude Oil Pipeline System, which commenced operations in June 2012 (see below). Our South Texas Crude Oil Pipeline System is not part of the new joint venture’s pipeline system.

August 2012 Senior Notes Offering and Launch of Commercial Paper Program

On August 6, 2012, EPO agreed to issue $650 million in principal amount of Senior Notes FF due August 2015 and $1.1 billion in principal amount of Senior Notes GG due February 2043. In addition, EPO established a commercial paper program on August 8, 2012 under which it may issue up to $2.0 billion of short-term commercial paper notes outstanding at any time. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” within this Item 2 for information regarding these recent developments.

Plans to Build World-Scale Propane Dehydrogenation Unit

In June 2012, we announced plans to build one of the world’s largest propane dehydrogenation (“PDH”) units, with capacity to produce up to 1.65 billion pounds per year (approximately 750,000 metric tons per year or approximately 25 MBPD) of polymer grade propylene. The PDH facility is expected to consume up to 35 MBPD of propane as feedstock and be located in southeast Texas along the Gulf Coast. The facility, which is supported by long-term, fee-based contracts, is expected to begin commercial operations during the third quarter of 2015 and integrate operationally with our other NGL and propylene facilities.

Table of Contents

Eagle Ford Expansion of Our South Texas Crude Oil Pipeline System Commences Operations

In June 2012, we announced that the Eagle Ford expansion of our South Texas Crude Oil Pipeline System commenced operations. This pipeline expansion, which has a crude oil transportation capacity of 350 MBPD, allows us to serve growing production areas in the Eagle Ford Shale supply basin. The new pipeline originates at Lyssy, Texas and extends approximately 147 miles to Sealy, Texas and includes 2.4 MMBbls of crude oil storage, including 0.6 MMBbls at Lyssy, 0.2 MMBbls at Milton, Texas, 0.4 MMBbls at Marshall, Texas and 1.2 MMBbls at Sealy.

Crude oil supplies arriving at Sealy on the new pipeline are being delivered to Houston area refiners through affiliate and third party pipelines. In addition, shippers will have access to our new Enterprise Crude Houston (“ECHO”) crude oil storage terminal located in southeast Houston. The ECHO facility is expected to commence operations in September 2012.

Seaway Pipeline Makes First Delivery of Crude Oil to Texas Gulf Coast

In June 2012, we and Enbridge Inc. (“Enbridge”) announced that the Seaway Pipeline made its first delivery of crude oil to the Texas Gulf Coast. The arrival marks the first southbound delivery of crude oil by pipeline from the oversupplied Cushing hub, and gives producers access to all of the major refineries in the Greater Houston area and Texas City. Additional pump station additions and modifications, which are expected to be completed by the first quarter of 2013, will increase throughput capacity on the Seaway Pipeline.

In March 2012, we secured capacity commitments from shippers to proceed with an additional expansion of the Seaway Pipeline. This expansion project entails the construction of a 512-mile, 30-inch diameter parallel pipeline mostly along the existing route of the Seaway Pipeline. It is anticipated that the new pipeline would commence operations by mid-2014. Once this expansion is completed, the total anticipated capacity of the Seaway Pipeline system would be approximately 850 MBPD.

The Seaway Pipeline delivers crude oil from Cushing into the Houston, Texas market utilizing affiliate and third party pipelines. Seaway Crude Oil Pipeline Company (“Seaway”) is constructing a 65-mile pipeline that will link its pipeline system to our ECHO facility. Completion of this pipeline segment is expected in 2013. In addition, Seaway plans to build an 85-mile pipeline from our ECHO facility to the Port Arthur/Beaumont, Texas refining center that would provide shippers access to the region’s heavy oil refining capabilities. Completion of this pipeline segment is expected in early 2014.

Yoakum Natural Gas Processing Plant Begins Operations in Eagle Ford Shale

In May 2012, we announced that the first phase of our new cryogenic natural gas processing plant at Yoakum, Texas commenced operations. As completed, the first phase provides us with more than 300 MMcf/d of natural gas processing capacity and the ability to extract over 40 MBPD of NGLs. The second phase of the Yoakum facility, which will add 300 MMcf/d of additional capacity, is expected to commence operations by mid-August 2012. The third and final phase of construction at the Yoakum facility, which will add another 300 MMcf/d of capacity, is expected to be completed by February 2013. Prior to the start-up of the Yoakum plant, we had been utilizing capacity at natural gas processing plants owned by third parties. Most of these volumes will now be directed to and processed at the Yoakum facility.

In April 2012, we completed a 65-mile residue natural gas pipeline linking the Yoakum plant to our Wilson natural gas storage facility. Additionally, we completed construction of 169 miles of pipelines that will transport mixed NGLs from the Yoakum plant to our NGL fractionation and storage complex at Mont Belvieu, Texas.

Plans to Construct Front Range Pipeline

In April 2012, we, along with Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and DCP Midstream, LLC formed a new joint venture, Front Range Pipeline LLC, to design and construct a new NGL pipeline that will

Table of Contents

originate in the Denver-Julesburg Basin (the “DJ Basin”) in Weld County, Colorado and extend approximately 435 miles to Skellytown in Carson County, Texas. Each party holds a one-third ownership interest in the joint venture. The Front Range Pipeline, with connections to our Mid-America Pipeline System and the Texas Express Pipeline, is expected to provide producers in the DJ Basin with access to the Gulf Coast, the largest NGL market in the U.S. Initial capacity on the Front Range Pipeline is expected to be approximately 150 MBPD, which could be readily expanded to approximately 230 MBPD. We will construct and operate the pipeline, which is expected to begin service during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Plans to Construct Two Additional NGL Fractionators at Mont Belvieu

In March 2012, we announced plans to construct two additional NGL fractionators at our Mont Belvieu, Texas complex that are expected to provide us with 170 MBPD of incremental NGL fractionation capacity. The two new fractionation units (each with 85 MBPD of expected capacity) are expected to commence operations during the fourth quarter of 2013 and support the continued growth of NGL production from expanding resource basins such as the Eagle Ford Shale and various production areas in the Rocky Mountains. Once these two new units are constructed and placed in service, our total gross NGL fractionation capacity at Mont Belvieu (eight fractionators in total) would approximate 655 MBPD.

Development of Our ATEX Express Long-Haul Ethane Pipeline

In January 2012, we secured sufficient transportation commitments to support development of our 1,230-mile Appalachia-to-Texas pipeline (the “ATEX Express”), which will transport growing ethane production from the Marcellus and Utica Shale producing areas to the U.S. Gulf Coast.

Demand for ethane feedstock over more expensive crude oil-based derivatives within the Gulf Coast petrochemical market has reached over 1 MMBPD. Several petrochemical companies have made announcements to modify, expand or build new facilities that would use ethane as a feedstock. As currently designed, the ATEX Express will have the capacity to transport up to 190 MBPD of ethane from Appalachian production areas to our storage and distribution assets in southeast Texas.

The project would utilize a combination of new and existing infrastructure. The northern portion of the ATEX Express involves construction of a pipeline that would originate in Pennsylvania and extend west, then southwest, to Indiana following existing pipeline corridors in order to minimize the environmental footprint of the project. The southern portion of ATEX Express would utilize a significant portion of our existing Products Pipeline System, which would be reversed to accommodate southbound delivery of ethane to the U.S. Gulf Coast. At the southern terminus of the ATEX Express in Beaumont, we plan to construct a 55-mile pipeline to provide shippers with access to our NGL storage complex at Mont Belvieu, which would provide them with direct and indirect access to every ethylene plant in the U.S. We expect that the ATEX Express will begin commercial operations in the first quarter of 2014.

Plans to Construct a Crude Oil Pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico with Genesis

In January 2012, we executed crude oil transportation agreements with six Gulf of Mexico producers that will support construction of a crude oil gathering pipeline serving the Lucius oil and gas field located in the southern Keathley Canyon area of the deepwater central Gulf of Mexico. The pipeline will be constructed and owned by Southeast Keathley Canyon Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (“SEKCO”), which is a 50/50 joint venture owned by us and Genesis Energy, L.P. (“Genesis”). We will serve as construction manager and operator of the new deepwater pipeline (the “SEKCO Oil Pipeline”). The SEKCO Oil Pipeline is expected to begin service by mid-2014.

Liquidation of Investment in Energy Transfer Equity

At December 31, 2011, we owned 29,303,514 common units of Energy Transfer Equity. On January 18, 2012, we sold 22,762,636 of these common units in a private transaction, which generated cash proceeds of approximately $825.1 million and a gain on the sale of $27.5 million. Following completion of the January 18 transaction, our ownership interest in Energy Transfer Equity was below 3%, and we

Table of Contents

discontinued using the equity method to account for this investment and began accounting for it as an investment in available-for-sale equity securities. For the period January 1, 2012 to January 18, 2012, we recorded $2.4 million of equity earnings from Energy Transfer Equity, which is reflected in our Other Investments segment.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Summarized Consolidated Income Statement Data (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

	For the Three Months						For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Revenues	$	9,789.8		$	11,216.5		$	21,042.3		$	21,400.2
Costs and expenses:
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		8,195.2			9,790.3			17,861.0			18,609.6
Other operating costs and expenses		572.9			514.9			1,116.8			1,020.3
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		261.3			233.3			515.9			464.1
Gains related to asset sales		(1.3	)		(5.2	)		(3.8	)		(23.6	)
Gains related to property damage insurance recoveries		(27.7	)		--			(27.7	)		--
Non-cash asset impairment charges		9.1			--			14.5			--
Total operating costs and expenses		9,009.5			10,533.3			19,476.7			20,070.4
General and administrative costs		42.5			50.4			88.8			88.3
Total costs and expenses		9,052.0			10,583.7			19,565.5			20,158.7
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		11.3			11.1			21.2			27.3
Operating income		749.1			643.9			1,498.0			1,268.8
Interest expense		(186.6	)		(188.3	)		(373.1	)		(372.1	)
Other, net		13.2			0.3			71.9			0.8
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		(8.5	)		(7.4	)		25.9			(14.5	)
Net income		567.2			448.5			1,222.7			883.0
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(0.9	)		(14.8	)		(5.1	)		(28.6	)
Net income attributable to limited partners	$	566.3		$	433.7		$	1,217.6		$	854.4

Consolidated Revenues by Business Segment

The following table presents each business segment’s contribution to revenues (net of eliminations and adjustments) for the periods indicated (dollars in millions)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
NGL Pipelines & Services:
Sales of NGLs and related products	$	3,133.9	$	3,832.2	$	7,249.2	$	7,889.9
Midstream services		198.6		204.7		437.8		403.8
Total		3,332.5		4,036.9		7,687.0		8,293.7
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services:
Sales of natural gas		510.8		719.5		1,083.4		1,432.2
Midstream services		209.6		207.8		470.6		411.7
Total		720.4		927.3		1,554.0		1,843.9
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services:
Sales of crude oil		4,174.0		4,257.9		8,621.6		7,606.1
Midstream services		14.7		23.7		40.7		46.1
Total		4,188.7		4,281.6		8,662.3		7,652.2
Offshore Pipelines & Services:
Sales of natural gas		--		0.3		0.1		0.6
Sales of crude oil		--		2.5		1.4		5.8
Midstream services		49.0		60.9		103.6		121.7
Total		49.0		63.7		105.1		128.1
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services:
Sales of petrochemicals and refined products		1,316.8		1,718.7		2,668.0		3,101.5
Midstream services		182.4		188.3		365.9		380.8
Total		1,499.2		1,907.0		3,033.9		3,482.3
Total consolidated revenues	$	9,789.8	$	11,216.5	$	21,042.3	$	21,400.2

Table of Contents

Selected Energy Commodity Price Data

The following table presents selected annual and quarterly industry index prices for natural gas, crude oil and selected NGL and petrochemical products for the periods presented:

													Polymer		Refinery
	Natural						Normal				Natural		Grade		Grade
	Gas,		Ethane,		Propane,		Butane,		Isobutane,		Gasoline,		Propylene,		Propylene,		Crude Oil,
	$/MMBtu		$/gallon		$/gallon		$/gallon		$/gallon		$/gallon		$/pound		$/pound		$/barrel
	(1)		(2)		(2)		(2)		(2)		(2)		(3)		(3)		(4)
2011
1st Quarter	$	4.11	$	0.66	$	1.37	$	1.75	$	1.85	$	2.27	$	0.76	$	0.68	$	94.10
2nd Quarter	$	4.32	$	0.78	$	1.49	$	1.87	$	2.02	$	2.48	$	0.89	$	0.79	$	102.56
3rd Quarter	$	4.20	$	0.78	$	1.54	$	1.88	$	2.09	$	2.37	$	0.78	$	0.67	$	89.76
4th Quarter	$	3.54	$	0.86	$	1.44	$	1.89	$	2.26	$	2.24	$	0.59	$	0.44	$	94.06
2011 Averages	$	4.04	$	0.77	$	1.46	$	1.85	$	2.06	$	2.34	$	0.76	$	0.64	$	95.12

2012
1st Quarter	$	2.72	$	0.56	$	1.26	$	1.93	$	2.04	$	2.39	$	0.69	$	0.60	$	102.93
2nd Quarter	$	2.21	$	0.40	$	0.98	$	1.62	$	1.75	$	2.05	$	0.66	$	0.51	$	93.49
2012 Averages	$	2.47	$	0.48	$	1.12	$	1.77	$	1.89	$	2.22	$	0.67	$	0.55	$	98.21

(1) Natural gas prices are based on Henry-Hub I-FERC commercial index prices. (2) NGL prices for ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasoline are based on Mont Belvieu Non-TET commercial index prices as reported by Oil Price Information Service. (3) Polymer-grade propylene prices represent average contract pricing for such product as reported by Chemical Market Associates, Inc. (“CMAI”). Refinery grade propylene prices represent weighted-average spot prices for such product as reported by CMAI. (4) Crude oil prices are based on commercial index prices for West Texas Intermediate as measured on the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”).

Period-to-period fluctuations in our consolidated revenues and cost of sales amounts are explained in large part by changes in energy commodity prices, especially those for NGLs, natural gas and crude oil. In general, energy commodity prices were lower during 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011. For example:

The weighted-average indicative market price for NGLs (based on prices for such products at Mont Belvieu, Texas) was $1.09 per gallon during the second quarter of 2012 versus $1.50 per gallon during the second quarter of 2011 – a 27% quarter-to-quarter decrease. The weighted-average indicative market price for NGLs for the first six months of 2012 was $1.22 per gallon compared to $1.43 per gallon during the first six months of 2011 – a 15% period-to-period decrease.

The market price of natural gas (as measured at Henry Hub in Louisiana) averaged $2.21 per MMBtu during the second quarter of 2012 versus $4.32 per MMBtu during the second quarter of 2011 – a 49% quarter-to-quarter decrease. The Henry Hub market price of natural gas for the first six months of 2012 averaged $2.47 per MMBtu compared to $4.21 per MMBtu during the first six months of 2011 – a 41% period-to-period decrease.

The market price of crude oil (as measured on the NYMEX) averaged $93.49 per barrel during the second quarter of 2012 compared to $102.56 per barrel during the second quarter of 2011 – a 9% quarter-to-quarter decrease. The NYMEX market price of crude oil for the first six months of 2012 averaged $98.21 per barrel compared to $98.33 per barrel during the first six months of 2011.

Factors underlying the general decrease in energy commodity prices during 2012 were global issues such as the ongoing Eurozone debt crisis and lower than expected growth in the U.S. and Asia-Pacific region. In addition, North American supplies of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil are rapidly expanding due to continuing development of NGL-rich resource basins such as the Eagle Ford, Marcellus

Table of Contents

and Utica shale production areas. As a result, regional supply and demand imbalances exist that are contributing to the weakness in energy commodity prices.

In addition, during the second quarter of 2012, the U.S. petrochemical industry experienced an extended period of planned and unplanned plant turnarounds with respect to ethylene production facilities, which led to lower demand and pricing for ethane (the largest component of NGL production by volume). Most of these turnarounds were completed by early July 2012. We estimate that demand for ethane is currently averaging in excess of 1 million barrels per day and we have seen ethane prices strengthen accordingly.

Natural gas processing margins are lower in 2012 when compared to 2011 primarily due to a decline in NGL market prices. In general, when operating and extraction costs of natural gas processing plants are higher than the incremental value of the NGL products that would be extracted, the recovery levels of certain NGL products, principally ethane, may be reduced or eliminated. Our natural gas processing plants are experiencing varying levels of reduced ethane recoveries as we enter the second half of 2012 due to the pricing environment; however, we anticipate some improvement in natural gas processing margins in connection with the strengthening of ethane prices noted above due to increased petrochemical demand.

We attempt to mitigate any commodity price exposure through our hedging activities as well as through converting keepwhole and similar contracts to fee-based arrangements. See Item 3 of this quarterly report for information regarding our commodity hedging activities.

Consolidated Income Statement Highlights

The following information highlights significant changes in our quarter-to-quarter and period-to-period income statement amounts and the primary drivers of such changes.

Revenues for the second quarter of 2012 decreased $1.43 billion compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower marketing revenues attributable to a decrease in NGL, natural gas, crude oil and petrochemical prices. For the first six months of 2012, revenues decreased $357.9 million when compared to the same period in 2011. NGL, natural gas and petrochemical marketing revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 decreased $1.42 billion primarily due to lower energy commodity prices in 2012. This period-to-period decrease was partially offset by a $1.01 billion period-to-period increase in crude oil sales revenues primarily due to higher sales volumes.

Operating costs and expenses for the second quarter of 2012 decreased $1.52 billion compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to lower cost of sales amounts attributable to the decrease in energy commodity prices. For the first six months of 2012, operating costs and expenses decreased $593.7 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The cost of sales associated with our NGL, natural gas and petrochemical marketing activities decreased $1.62 billion period-to-period primarily due to lower energy commodity prices. This period-to-period decrease was partially offset by an $876.1 million increase in the cost of sales associated with increased crude oil sales volumes.

During the second quarter of 2012, we collected $27.7 million of nonrefundable cash proceeds from insurance carriers that we recognized as a gain within operating costs and expenses. These proceeds relate to property damage claims we made in connection with the February 2011 NGL release and fire at the West Storage location of our Mont Belvieu, Texas underground storage facility. For additional information regarding our insurance matters, see “– Other Items – Insurance Matters” within this Item 2.

General and administrative costs for the second quarter of 2012 decreased $7.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2011. The quarter-to-quarter decrease was primarily due to lower compensation costs and timing of expenses for outside tax-related services in 2012 compared to 2011. In addition, general and administrative costs for the second quarter of 2011 included transaction expenses of $1.5 million related to the Duncan Merger. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative costs were essentially unchanged with respect to the same period in 2011.

Table of Contents

Although interest expense was essentially unchanged quarter-to-quarter and period-to-period, our average debt principal balance increased to $14.80 billion in the second quarter of 2012 from $14.23 billion in the second quarter of 2011. Likewise, our average debt principal balance for the first six months of 2012 was $14.66 billion compared to $14.18 billion for the same period in 2011. A substantial portion of the interest cost was capitalized in connection with our capital spending program. Capitalized interest for the second quarter of 2012 increased $4.7 million compared to the second quarter of 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, capitalized interest increased $18.1 million compared to the same period in 2011.

Results for the first six months of 2012 include $68.8 million of gains recorded in connection with the liquidation of our investment in Energy Transfer Equity, which was completed in April 2012. Of this amount, $15.5 million pertains to the second quarter of 2012. These gains are a component of “Other, net” as presented on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations. We no longer have an investment in Energy Transfer Equity. For additional information, see “Liquidation of Investment in Energy Transfer Equity” under Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

We recognized a net income tax benefit of $25.9 million for the first six months of 2012 compared to a $14.5 million provision for income taxes recognized for the first six months of 2011. The $40.4 million period-to-period change in income taxes is primarily due to a $46.5 million benefit related to the conversion of certain of our subsidiaries to limited liability companies during the first quarter of 2012. The provision for income taxes for the second quarter of 2012 was essentially unchanged from that of the second quarter of 2011.

Business Segment Highlights

Total segment gross operation margin was $1.0 billion for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $922.5 million for the second quarter of 2011. With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, total segment gross operating margin was $2.1 billion versus $1.8 billion for the same period in 2011.

We currently have five active reportable business segments: (i) NGL Pipelines & Services; (ii) Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services; (iii) Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services; (iv) Offshore Pipelines & Services; and (v) Petrochemical & Refined Products Services. We evaluate segment performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of gross operating margin. For information regarding this financial metric, see “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” within this Item 2.

The following information highlights significant changes in our period-to-period segment results (i.e., gross operating margin amounts) and the primary drivers of such changes. The selected volume statistics presented in the tabular information for each segment are reported on a net basis, taking into account our ownership interests in certain joint ventures, and reflect the periods in which we owned an interest in such operations. These statistics reflect volumes for newly constructed assets from the dates such assets were placed into service and for purchased assets from the date of acquisition.

All activities included in our sixth reportable business segment, Other Investments, ceased on January 18, 2012, which was the date we discontinued using the equity method to account for our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity. Our equity earnings from this investment were $2.7 million for the second quarter of 2011 and $2.4 million and $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Table of Contents

NGL Pipelines & Services. The following table presents segment gross operating margin and selected volumetric data for the NGL Pipelines & Services segment for the periods indicated (dollars in millions, volumes as noted):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Segment gross operating margin:
Natural gas processing and related NGL marketing activities	$	338.8	$	303.2	$	760.5	$	580.9
NGL pipelines and related storage		157.8		142.6		326.2		322.5
NGL fractionation		69.2		51.9		134.0		98.7
Total	$	565.8	$	497.7	$	1,220.7	$	1,002.1
Selected volumetric data:
NGL transportation volumes (MBPD)		2,440		2,253		2,409		2,309
NGL fractionation volumes (MBPD)		654		545		638		547
Equity NGL production (MBPD) (1)		96		120		104		119
Fee-based natural gas processing (MMcf/d) (2)		4,232		3,687		4,183		3,692

(1) Represents the NGL volumes we earn and take title to in connection with our processing activities. In general, equity NGL production decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 due to reduced ethane recoveries associated with the weakness in natural gas processing margins resulting from lower NGL prices. (2) Volumes reported correspond to the revenue streams earned by our gas plants.

Natural gas processing and related NGL marketing activities

Gross operating margin from our natural gas processing and related NGL marketing activities for the second quarter of 2012 increased $35.6 million compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to a $32.5 million quarter-to-quarter increase in gross operating margin from our NGL marketing activities attributable to higher product sales margins. Gross operating margin from our natural gas processing plants located in the Rocky Mountains increased $24.7 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to improved commodity hedging results during the second quarter of 2012, which benefited processing margins at these facilities. Including the impact of improved commodity hedging results, processing margins and fees at our Rocky Mountain processing plants increased approximately $55.2 million quarter-to-quarter, which more than offset an estimated $30.5 million reduction in gross operating margin attributable to lower volumes. Gross operating margin from our San Juan/Permian Basin and south Louisiana natural gas processing plants decreased $20.5 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to lower natural gas processing margins and equity NGL production volumes. The decrease in equity NGL production volumes contributed to an estimated $7.5 million of the quarter-to-quarter reduction in gross operating margin, with the remainder of the decrease generally attributable to lower processing margins. Our south Louisiana plants were negatively impacted by maintenance down-time at third-party owned facilities, which reduced production volumes sourced from certain Gulf of Mexico resource basins during the second quarter of 2012. Gross operating margin from our Texas natural gas processing plants decreased $0.9 million quarter-to-quarter. The additional gross operating margin resulting from the start-up of our Yoakum plant in May 2012 and a quarter-to-quarter increase in fee-based processing volumes were more than offset by lower natural gas processing margins and equity NGL production volumes during the second quarter of 2012.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin from our natural gas processing and related NGL marketing activities increased $179.6 million when compared with the same six month period in 2011. Gross operating margin from our NGL marketing activities for the first six months of 2012 increased $97.3 million over the same period in 2011 attributable to higher sales margins. Gross operating margin from our Rocky Mountain plants increased $79.0 million period-to-period primarily due to improved commodity hedging results, which benefited processing margins at these facilities, and a $20.0 million gain associated with a legal settlement with a supplier during the 2012 period. Including the impact of improved commodity hedging results, processing margins and fees at our Rocky Mountain processing plants increased approximately $101.6 million period-to-period, which more than offset an estimated $42.6 million reduction in gross operating margin attributable to lower volumes.

Table of Contents

NGL pipelines and related storage

Gross operating margin from our NGL pipelines and related storage business for the second quarter of 2012 increased $15.2 million compared to second quarter of 2011. Gross operating margin from our Mid-America Pipeline System, Seminole Pipeline and related NGL terminals increased $7.0 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to an increase in system-wide tariffs that went into effect in July 2011. Gross operating margin from our NGL storage business and Houston Ship Channel import/export terminal increased a combined $11.8 million for the second quarter of 2012 primarily due to higher storage and NGL export volumes. Collectively, gross operating margin from the remainder of our NGL pipelines and related storage business decreased $3.6 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to the impact of net operational measurement gains during the second quarter of 2011 that did not reoccur during the second quarter of 2012.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin from our NGL pipelines and related storage business increased $3.7 million when compared with the same six month period in 2011. Gross operating margin from our Mid-America Pipeline System, Seminole Pipeline and related NGL terminals increased $21.1 million period-to-period primarily due to the increase in system-wide tariffs noted above, which accounted for approximately $12.0 million of the increase, and higher volumes. Gross operating margin from our NGL storage business and Houston Ship Channel import/export terminal increased a combined $16.9 million for the first six months of 2012 primarily due to higher storage and export volumes.

The foregoing year-to-date increases in gross operating margin from our NGL pipelines and related storage business were partially offset by several factors. Gross operating margin from our NGL pipelines in southern Louisiana decreased $9.2 million period-to-period primarily due to a decrease in transportation volumes attributable to lower NGL production volumes from the Gulf of Mexico and decreased volumes transported from Mont Belvieu to NGL fractionators in Louisiana. Gross operating margin from our Dixie Pipeline and related NGL terminals decreased $7.5 million period-to-period primarily due to higher pipeline integrity expenses and lower transportation volumes attributable to warmer weather and maintenance-related downtime during the first six months of 2012. The decrease in transportation volumes on the Dixie Pipeline accounted for approximately $5.0 million of the period-to-period decrease in gross operating margin. Collectively, gross operating margin from the remainder of our NGL pipelines and related storage business decreased $17.6 million period-to-period primarily due to the impact of net operational measurement gains during the first six months of 2011 that did not reoccur during the first six months of 2012.

NGL fractionation

Gross operating margin from NGL fractionation for the second quarter of 2012 increased $17.3 million compared to the second quarter of 2011. Gross operating margin from our Mont Belvieu NGL fractionators increased $20.6 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher NGL fractionation volumes. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we placed into service a fifth NGL fractionator at our Mont Belvieu complex, which added more than 75 MBPD of NGL fractionation capacity at this key industry hub.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin from NGL fractionation increased $35.3 million compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to higher fractionation volumes at our Mont Belvieu complex.

Table of Contents

Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services. The following table presents segment gross operating margin and selected volumetric data for the Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services segment for the periods indicated (dollars in millions, volumes as noted):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Segment gross operating margin	$	175.8	$	161.1	$	382.0	$	320.3
Selected volumetric data:
Natural gas transportation volumes (BBtus/d)		13,793		11,891		13,436		11,804

Gross operating margin from our onshore natural gas pipelines and services business increased $14.7 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Gross operating margin from our Acadian Gas System increased $41.0 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to contributions from our Haynesville Extension pipeline. The Haynesville Extension of our Acadian Gas System commenced operations in November 2011 and transported 1.4 TBtus/d of natural gas during the second quarter of 2012. Gross operating margin from our Texas Intrastate System increased $20.2 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher firm capacity reservation revenues, which accounted for approximately $19.6 million of the increase, and higher natural gas throughput volumes. Increased natural gas production volumes from the Eagle Ford Shale supply basin resulted in stronger demand for our natural gas transportation services during the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011.

Gross operating margin from our San Juan Gathering System decreased $15.2 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to lower gathering fees and production volumes caused by the decrease in natural gas prices. Lower gathering and related fees for the second quarter of 2012 accounted for approximately $9.1 million of the quarter-to-quarter reduction in gross operating margin from our San Juan Gathering System. Collectively, gross operating margin from our Jonah Gathering System and Central Treating Facility decreased $9.7 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to lower production volumes. Gross operating margin from our natural gas marketing activities decreased $8.6 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to lower sales margins. Lastly, gross operating margin from our natural gas storage business was $1.7 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to $10.5 million for the second quarter of 2011, an $8.8 million quarter-to-quarter decrease primarily due to the sale of our Mississippi natural gas storage facilities in December 2011.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin from onshore natural gas pipelines and services increased $61.7 million compared to the same period in 2011. Gross operating margin from our Acadian Gas System increased $81.8 million period-to-period primarily due to contributions from our Haynesville Extension pipeline. Gross operating margin from our Texas Intrastate System increased $49.2 million period-to-period primarily due to higher firm capacity reservation revenues, which accounted for approximately $38.6 million of the increase, and higher natural gas throughput volumes attributable to Eagle Ford Shale production.

Gross operating margin from our San Juan Gathering System decreased $19.9 million period-to-period primarily due to lower gathering fees and production volumes caused by the decrease in natural gas prices. Lower gathering and related fees accounted for $13.3 million of the period-to-period decrease in gross operating margin from our San Juan Gathering System. Gross operating margin from our natural gas marketing activities decreased $14.4 million period-to-period primarily due to lower sales margins. Collectively, gross operating margin from our Jonah Gathering System and Central Treating Facility decreased $13.7 million period-to-period primarily due to lower production volumes. Lastly, gross operating margin from our natural gas storage business was $3.5 million for the first six months of 2012 compared to $23.7 million for the first six months of 2011, a $20.2 million period-to-period decrease primarily due to the sale of our Mississippi natural gas storage facilities in December 2011.

Table of Contents

Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services. The following table presents segment gross operating margin and selected volumetric data for the Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services segment for the periods indicated (dollars in millions, volumes as noted):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Segment gross operating margin	$	95.8	$	67.8	$	135.1	$	99.6
Selected volumetric data:
Crude oil transportation volumes (MBPD)		725		642		716		654

Gross operating margin from our onshore crude oil pipelines and services business increased $28.0 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Gross operating margin from our crude oil marketing and related activities increased $18.0 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to higher sales margins, which accounted for approximately $11.1 million of the increase, and volumes. Our crude oil marketing activities continue to benefit from increased crude oil production volumes from supply basins in the Eagle Ford Shale, Barnett Shale, West Texas and Rocky Mountains. Gross operating margin from our South Texas Crude Oil Pipeline System increased $6.7 million quarter-to-quarter due to higher average fees, which accounted for approximately $4.4 million of the increase, and a 19 MBPD increase in throughput volumes for the second quarter of 2012. Equity earnings from our investment in Seaway increased $5.1 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to the Seaway Pipeline commencing the southbound delivery of crude oil during the second quarter of 2012.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin from onshore crude oil pipelines and services increased $35.5 million period-to-period. Gross operating margin from our crude oil marketing and related activities increased $20.8 million period-to-period primarily due to higher sales volumes, which accounted for approximately $12.7 million of the increase, and margins. Collectively, gross operating margin from our South Texas Crude Oil Pipeline System, West Texas System, Red River System and Basin Pipeline System increased $13.1 million period-to-period due to a 30 MBPD increase in throughput volumes and higher fees during the first six months of 2012. Of the $13.1 million period-to-period collective increase in gross operating margin for these pipelines, approximately $7.1 million of the increase is attributable to higher volumes. Equity earnings from our investment in Seaway increased $6.2 million period-to-period primarily due to the Seaway Pipeline commencing the southbound delivery of crude oil during the second quarter of 2012. Gross operating margin from our crude oil terminal in Midland, Texas decreased $3.5 million period-to-period primarily due to higher operating expenses for operational measurement gains and losses during the first six months of 2012.

Offshore Pipelines & Services. The following table presents segment gross operating margin and selected volumetric data for the Offshore Pipelines & Services segment for the periods indicated (dollars in millions, volumes as noted):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Segment gross operating margin	$	38.3	$	53.4	$	90.4	$	114.7
Selected volumetric data:
Natural gas transportation volumes (BBtus/d)		907		1,039		934		1,097
Crude oil transportation volumes (MBPD)		285		279		287		289
Platform natural gas processing (MMcf/d)		326		417		341		431
Platform crude oil processing (MBPD)		18		19		19		17

Gross operating margin from our offshore pipelines and services business decreased $15.1 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Collectively, gross operating margin from our Independence Hub platform and Trail pipeline decreased $18.5 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to lower throughput volumes and platform demand fee revenues during the second quarter of 2012 versus the second quarter of 2011. Producers connected to our Independence Hub platform paid us approximately $54.6 million of demand fees annually for five years beginning in March 2007 until that

Table of Contents

period expired in March 2012. Expiration of the contractual demand fees resulted in a $13.7 million quarter-to-quarter decrease in gross operating margin. Net to our interest, natural gas processing volumes on the Independence Hub platform decreased 94 MMcf/d quarter-to-quarter as a result of lost production volumes that have not been replaced by new production. Collectively, gross operating margin from the remainder of the assets in this segment increased $3.4 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to natural gas and crude oil production from the Caesar/Tonga development in the Green Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico. Production from the Caesar/Tonga development commenced in March 2012 and resulted in a quarter-to-quarter increase in transportation volumes on our Anaconda Natural Gas Pipeline and our Constitution and Poseidon Crude Oil Pipelines.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin from offshore pipelines and services decreased $24.3 million period-to-period. Collectively, gross operating margin from our Independence Hub platform and Trail pipeline decreased $27.4 million period-to-period primarily due to lower throughput volumes and platform demand fee revenues during the first six months of 2012 versus the first six months of 2011. Expiration of the contractual demand fees during the first six months of 2012 resulted in a $17.6 million period-to-period decrease in gross operating margin. Net to our interest, natural gas processing volumes on the Independence Hub platform decreased 94 MMcf/d period-to-period as a result of lost production volumes that have not been replaced by new production. Collectively, gross operating margin from the remainder of the assets in this segment increased $3.1 million period-to-period primarily due to natural gas and crude oil production from the Caesar/Tonga development in the Green Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico.

Petrochemical & Refined Products Services. The following table presents segment gross operating margin and selected volumetric data for the Petrochemical & Refined Products Services segment for the periods indicated (dollars in millions, volumes as noted):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Segment gross operating margin:
Propylene fractionation and related activities	$	42.8	$	31.2	$	103.9	$	80.0
Butane isomerization		25.1		34.7		45.7		60.4
Octane enhancement and related plant operations		50.7		37.2		37.6		43.3
Refined products pipelines		18.1		22.2		30.2		40.5
Marine transportation and other		20.6		14.5		37.7		28.0
Total	$	157.3	$	139.8	$	255.1	$	252.2
Selected volumetric data:
Propylene fractionation volumes (MBPD)		73		68		73		71
Butane isomerization volumes (MBPD)		100		103		91		96
Octane additive and associated plant production volumes (MBPD)		22		19		14		17
Transportation volumes, primarily refined products and petrochemicals (MBPD)		596		761		628		752

Propylene fractionation and related marketing activities

Gross operating margin from our propylene fractionation and related petrochemical marketing activities increased $11.6 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to higher propylene sales margins during the second quarter of 2012. With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin increased $23.9 million compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to higher propylene sales margins during the first six months of 2012.

Butane isomerization

Gross operating margin from butane isomerization decreased $9.6 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Likewise, gross operating margin for the first six months of 2012 declined $14.7 million compared to the same period in 2011. Both the quarter-to-quarter and year-to-date decreases in gross operating margin are primarily due to lower isomerization volumes (and

Table of Contents

corresponding by-product production and sales) and processing fees. Isomerization volumes for 2012 were negatively impacted by extended downtime for maintenance at our octane enhancement facility (which utilizes high purity isobutane feedstock produced at our butane isomerization facility) during the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in by-product production and sales during the second quarter of 2012 accounted for approximately $7.4 million of the $9.6 million quarter-to-quarter reduction in gross operating margin. Likewise, the decrease in by-product production and sales during the first six months of 2012 accounted for approximately $9.8 million of the $14.7 million period-to-period decrease in gross operating margin.

Octane enhancement and related plant operations

Gross operating margin from octane enhancement and related high purity isobutylene plant operations increased a combined $13.5 million quarter-to-quarter. This increase was primarily due to higher motor gasoline additive sales volumes, which accounted for an estimated $7.6 million of the quarter-to-quarter increase, and higher sales margins during the second quarter of 2012.

With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin for these facilities decreased $5.7 million compared to the same period in 2011. This period-to-period decrease was primarily due to lower volumes and higher operating expenses at our octane enhancement facility resulting from extended downtime for maintenance during the first quarter of 2012. Additional costs associated with this facility’s extended maintenance work during the first quarter of 2012 were approximately $6.6 million.

Refined products pipelines and related marketing activities

Gross operating margin from refined products pipelines and related marketing activities decreased $4.1 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily due to a 60 MBPD quarter-to-quarter decrease in refined products delivered to Midwest U.S. markets. With respect to the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross operating margin decreased $10.3 million versus the same period in 2011 primarily due to a 32 MBPD period-to-period decrease in propane and butane volumes delivered to Northeast U.S. markets and a 60 MBPD period-to-period decrease in refined products volumes delivered to Midwest U.S. markets. In general, warmer weather during the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 resulted in lower demand for propane used as heating fuel, while shipments of refined products from the Gulf Coast to Midwest markets decreased as a result of lower prices for such products in Midwestern markets than in Gulf Coast markets.

Marine transportation and other

Gross operating margin from marine transportation and other segment services increased $6.1 million for the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011. Likewise, gross operating margin increased $9.7 million for the first six months of 2012 versus the same period in 2011. The quarter-to-quarter and year-to-date increases in gross operating margin are primarily due to the combination of higher marine transportation fees and lower operating expenses associated with our fleet of marine vessels during 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2012, we had $3.09 billion of consolidated liquidity, which is defined as unrestricted cash on hand plus borrowing capacity available under EPO’s $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility. Based on current market conditions (as of the filing date of this quarterly report), we believe we will have sufficient liquidity, cash flow from operations and access to capital markets to fund our capital expenditures and working capital needs.

Long-Term Debt

We had approximately $15.01 billion of principal amounts outstanding under consolidated debt agreements at June 30, 2012. In February 2012, EPO issued $750.0 million in principal amount of 30-year

Table of Contents

unsecured Senior Notes EE. These notes were issued at 99.542% of their principal amount, have a fixed-rate of interest of 4.85% and mature on August 15, 2042. Net proceeds from the issuance of Senior Notes EE were used to temporarily reduce borrowings outstanding under EPO’s $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility (which was used to repay at maturity its $490.5 million principal amount of Senior Notes S due February 2012 and $9.5 million principal amount of TEPPCO Senior Notes due February 2012 prior to the delivery of Senior Notes EE) and for general company purposes.

August 2012 Senior Notes Offering. On August 6, 2012, EPO agreed to issue $650 million in principal amount of 3-year unsecured Senior Notes FF at 99.941% of their principal amount and $1.1 billion million in principal amount of 30-year unsecured Senior Notes GG at 99.470% of their principal amount. The transaction is scheduled to close on August 13, 2012. The Senior Notes FF to be issued upon closing will have a fixed interest rate of 1.25% and mature on August 13, 2015, and the Senior Notes GG to be issued upon closing will have a fixed interest rate of 4.45% and mature on February 15, 2043. Enterprise has agreed to guarantee both such series of notes through an unconditional guarantee on an unsecured and unsubordinated basis. EPO expects to use net proceeds from the issuance of such notes to temporarily reduce borrowings under its $3.5 Billion Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility (which was used to repay amounts due upon the maturity of its $500.0 million principal amount of Senior Notes P on August 1, 2012) and for general company purposes.

Commercial Paper Program

For additional information regarding our consolidated debt obligations, see Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

Registration Statements

We may issue additional equity or debt securities to assist us in meeting our future liquidity and capital spending requirements. We have a universal shelf registration statement (the “2010 Shelf”) on file with the SEC. The 2010 Shelf allows Enterprise and EPO (on a standalone basis) to issue an unlimited amount of equity and debt securities, respectively. EPO utilized the 2010 Shelf to issue its Senior Notes EE in February 2012 and will use the 2010 Shelf to issue Senior Notes FF and GG in August 2012.

In May 2012, we entered into an equity distribution agreement with certain broker-dealers pursuant to which we may offer and sell up to $1.0 billion of our common units in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of such offerings. Pursuant to this “at-the-market” program, we may sell common units under the agreement from time to time by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions through the NYSE at market prices, in block transactions or as otherwise agreed to with the broker-dealer parties to the agreement. A registration statement covering the issuance and sale of common units pursuant to this agreement was filed with the SEC in March 2012. There were no issuances and sales under this agreement as of August 9, 2012.

For information regarding our registration statements, see Note 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

As of August 9, 2012, the investment-grade credit ratings of EPO’s long-term senior unsecured debt securities were: BBB from Standard and Poor’s; Baa2 from Moody’s; and BBB from Fitch Ratings, and the credit ratings of EPO’s short-term senior unsecured debt securities were: A-2 from Standard and Poor’s and P-2 from Moody’s. EPO’s credit ratings reflect only the view of a rating agency and should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any of our securities. A credit rating can be revised upward or downward or withdrawn at any time by a rating agency, if it determines that circumstances warrant such a change. A credit rating from one rating agency should be evaluated independently of credit ratings from other rating agencies.

Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities

The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods indicated (dollars in millions). For additional information regarding our cash flow amounts, please refer to the Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

	For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	1,338.3	$	1,754.5
Cash used in investing activities		749.8		1,492.2
Cash used in financing activities		593.8		218.7

Net cash flows provided by operating activities are largely dependent on earnings from our consolidated business activities. As a result, these cash flows are exposed to certain risks. We operate predominantly in the midstream energy industry. We provide products and services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals. The products that we process, sell, transport or store are principally used as fuel for residential, agricultural and commercial heating; as feedstocks in petrochemical manufacturing; and in the production of motor gasoline. Reduced demand for our services or products by industrial customers, whether because of a decline in general economic conditions, reduced demand for the end products made with our products, or increased competition from other service providers or producers due to pricing differences or other reasons, could have a negative impact on our earnings and operating cash flows. For a more complete discussion of these and other risk factors pertinent to our business, see “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of our 2011 Form 10-K.

The following information highlights significant period-to-period variances in our cash flow amounts and the primary drivers of these variances:

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 with Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Operating Activities. The $416.2 million period-to-period decrease in net cash flows provided by operating activities was primarily due to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements partially offset by increased earnings (e.g., our gross operating margin increased $287.8 million period-to-period).

Investing Activities. The $742.4 million decrease in cash used for investing activities was primarily due to proceeds from asset sales, which increased $878.5 million period-to-period due to the sale of 29,303,514 Energy Transfer Equity common units for $1.1 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2012. These proceeds were partially offset by a $93.3 million increase in capital spending for property, plant and equipment primarily for Eagle Ford Shale growth capital projects as well as a $113.7 million increase in investments in unconsolidated affiliates primarily related to newly formed joint venture projects.

Table of Contents

Financing Activities. Cash used in financing activities increased $375.1 million period-to-period primarily due to the following:

Net borrowings under our consolidated debt agreements decreased $234.0 million period-to-period. EPO issued $750.0 million and repaid $500.0 million in principal amount of senior notes during the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the issuance of $1.5 billion and repayment of $450.0 million in principal amount of senior notes during the six months ended June 30, 2011. In addition, net borrowings under our consolidated revolving bank credit facilities and term loans during the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $277.0 million compared to net repayments of $286.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Monetization of interest rate derivative instruments during the six months ended June 30, 2012 resulted in a net cash outflow of $77.6 million compared to a $5.7 million outflow for similar activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011. For information regarding our interest rate hedging activities, see Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

§	Cash distributions paid to limited partners increased $102.1 million period-to-period primarily due to a higher number of distribution-bearing common units outstanding and the associated quarterly distribution rates.

Capital Spending

An integral part of our business strategy involves expansion through growth capital projects, business combinations and investments in joint ventures. We believe that we are positioned to continue to expand our system of assets through the construction of new facilities and to capitalize on expected increases in natural gas, NGL and crude oil production resulting from development activities in the Rocky Mountains, Midcontinent, Northeast and U.S. Gulf Coast regions, including the Barnett, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Marcellus and Utica Shale plays and deepwater Gulf of Mexico producing regions.

Although our current focus is on expansion through growth capital projects, management continues to analyze potential business combinations, joint ventures and similar transactions with businesses that operate in complementary markets or geographic regions. In past years, major oil and gas companies have sold non-strategic assets in the midstream energy sector in which we operate. We believe this trend will continue and we expect independent oil and natural gas companies to consider similar divestitures.

The following table summarizes our capital spending for the periods presented (dollars in millions):

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011
Capital spending for property, plant and equipment, net of contributions in aid of construction costs	$	1,803.1	$	1,709.8
Capital spending for investments in unconsolidated affiliates		125.5		11.8
Other investing activities		16.6		3.6
Total capital spending	$	1,945.2	$	1,725.2

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we spent $1.7 billion on growth capital projects, of which approximately $810 million was for Eagle Ford Shale projects.

Based on information currently available, we estimate our consolidated capital spending for 2012 will approximate $4.1 billion, which includes estimated expenditures of $3.8 billion for growth capital projects and $330 million for sustaining capital expenditures. Our forecast of consolidated capital expenditures for 2012 is based on our announced strategic operating and growth plans, which are dependent upon our ability to generate the required funds from either operating cash flows or other means,

Table of Contents

including borrowings under debt agreements, issuance of additional debt and equity securities, and potential divestitures. We may revise our forecast of capital spending due to factors beyond our control, such as weather related issues, changes in supplier prices or adverse economic conditions. Furthermore, our forecast of capital spending may change as a result of decisions made by management at a later date, which may include the addition of costs associated with unforeseen acquisition opportunities.

Our success in raising capital, including the formation of joint ventures to share costs and risks, continues to be a principal factor in determining how much capital we can invest. We believe our access to capital resources is sufficient to meet the demands of our current and future growth needs and, although we currently intend to make the forecast capital expenditures noted above, we may adjust the timing and amounts of projected expenditures in response to changes in capital markets.

At June 30, 2012, we had approximately $1.5 billion in purchase commitments outstanding that relate to our capital spending for property, plant and equipment. These commitments primarily relate to construction projects in Texas, including those in the Eagle Ford Shale and at our Mont Belvieu facility.

Pipeline Integrity Costs

Our pipelines are subject to safety programs administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”). This federal agency has issued safety regulations containing requirements for the development of integrity management programs for hazardous liquid pipelines (e.g., NGL, crude oil, refined products and petrochemical pipelines) and natural gas pipelines. In general, these regulations require companies to assess the condition of their pipelines in certain high consequence areas (as defined by the regulation) and to perform any necessary repairs. The following table summarizes our pipeline integrity costs, including those attributable to DOT regulations, for the periods presented (dollars in millions):

	For the Three Months				For the Six Months
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Expensed	$	17.9	$	14.1	$	36.9	$	21.8
Capitalized		27.0		16.0		39.9		26.7
Total	$	44.9	$	30.1	$	76.8	$	48.5

We expect the cost of our pipeline integrity program, irrespective of whether such costs are capitalized or expensed, to approximate $62.0 million for the remainder of 2012. The cost of our pipeline integrity program was $117.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

A discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in our 2011 Form 10-K. The following estimates, in our opinion, are subjective in nature, require the exercise of professional judgment and involve complex analysis:

§	depreciation methods and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment;

§	measuring recoverability of long-lived assets and equity method investments;

§	amortization methods and estimated useful lives of qualifying intangible assets;

§	methods we employ to measure the fair value of goodwill;

§	revenue recognition policies and the use of estimates when recording revenue and expense accruals; and

§	reserves for environmental matters and litigation contingencies.

When used in the preparation of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, such estimates are based on our current knowledge and understanding of the underlying facts and circumstances and may be revised as a result of actions we take in the future. Changes in these estimates will occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events. Subsequent changes in

Table of Contents

these estimates may have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Recent Accounting Developments

Other Items

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our non-GAAP gross operating margin by business segment and in total is as follows for the periods presented (dollars in millions):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
NGL Pipelines & Services	$	565.8	$	497.7	$	1,220.7	$	1,002.1
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services		175.8		161.1		382.0		320.3
Onshore Crude Oil Pipelines & Services		95.8		67.8		135.1		99.6
Offshore Pipelines & Services		38.3		53.4		90.4		114.7
Petrochemical & Refined Products Services		157.3		139.8		255.1		252.2
Other Investments (1)		--		2.7		2.4		9.0
Total segment gross operating margin	$	1,033.0	$	922.5	$	2,085.7	$	1,797.9

(1) Represents the equity earnings we recorded from our previously held investment in Energy Transfer Equity. Our reporting for this segment ceased on January 18, 2012 when we stopped using the equity method to account for this investment. See Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report for additional information regarding the liquidation of our investment in Energy Transfer Equity.

Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of total segment gross operating margin to GAAP operating income and further to income before income taxes for the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Total segment gross operating margin	$	1,033.0		$	922.5		$	2,085.7		$	1,797.9
Adjustments to reconcile total segment gross operating margin to operating income:
Amounts included in operating costs and expenses:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		(261.3	)		(233.3	)		(515.9	)		(464.1	)
Non-cash asset impairment charges		(9.1	)		--			(14.5	)		--
Operating lease expenses paid by EPCO		--			(0.1	)		--			(0.3	)
Gains related to asset sales		1.3			5.2			3.8			23.6
Gains related to property damage insurance recoveries (1)		27.7			--			27.7			--
General and administrative costs		(42.5	)		(50.4	)		(88.8	)		(88.3	)
Operating income		749.1			643.9			1,498.0			1,268.8
Other expense, net		(173.4	)		(188.0	)		(301.2	)		(371.3	)
Income before income taxes	$	575.7		$	455.9		$	1,196.8		$	897.5

(1) See “Other Items – Insurance Matters” within this Item 2.

Contractual Obligations

Since January 1, 2012, we (i) issued Senior Notes EE in February 2012 and (ii) repaid our Senior Notes S and $9.5 million principal amount of TEPPCO Senior Notes in February 2012. In August 2012, we issued Senior Notes FF and GG and repaid Senior Notes P. See Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report for information regarding our consolidated debt obligations. There were no material changes in our operating lease or purchase obligations since those reported in our 2011 Form 10-K.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably expected to have a material current or future effect on our financial position, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Related Party Transactions

For information regarding our related party transactions, see Note 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report.

Insurance Matters

We participate as a named insured in EPCO’s insurance program, which provides us with property damage, business interruption and other insurance coverage, the scope and amounts of which we believe are customary and prudent for the nature and extent of our operations. While we believe EPCO maintains adequate insurance coverage on our behalf, insurance may not fully cover every type of damage, interruption or other loss that might occur. If we were to incur a significant loss for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, there may be timing differences between amounts we accrue related property damage expense, amounts we are required to pay in connection with a loss and amounts we subsequently receive from insurance carriers as reimbursements. Any event that materially interrupts the revenues generated by our consolidated operations, or other losses that require us to make material expenditures not reimbursed by insurance, could reduce our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders and, accordingly, adversely affect the market price of our common units.

Table of Contents

recovery. Amounts we receive from insurance carriers are net of any deductibles related to the covered event. EPCO renewed its annual insurance programs during the second quarter of 2012. Under terms of the renewed policies, EPCO’s deductibles now range from $5.0 million to $60.0 million depending on the nature of the loss (windstorm or non-windstorm) and the assets involved (onshore or offshore).

After performing a cost-benefit analysis, management elected to forego windstorm coverage for our Gulf of Mexico offshore assets. The combination of increasingly high deductibles and premiums resulted in such coverage being uneconomic to us; therefore, we chose to self-insure such operations for the current annual policy period. Although the new EPCO policies do not provide any windstorm coverage for offshore assets, producers affiliated with our Independence Hub and Marco Polo platforms provide windstorm coverage of approximately $350.0 million for each of these key offshore assets.

During the second quarter of 2012, we collected $27.7 million of nonrefundable cash proceeds from insurance carriers that we recognized as a gain within operating costs and expenses. These proceeds relate to property damage claims we made in connection with the February 2011 NGL release and fire at the West Storage location of our Mont Belvieu, Texas underground storage facility. As additional non-refundable insurance proceeds continue to be received, we expect to record gains equal to such proceeds.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Our exposures to market risk have not changed materially since those reported under Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” included in our 2011 Form 10-K.

We assess the risk of each of our derivative instrument portfolios using a sensitivity analysis model. The sensitivity analysis applied to each portfolio measures the potential income or loss (i.e., the change in fair value of the derivative instrument portfolio) based upon a hypothetical 10% movement in the underlying interest rates or quoted market prices (as applicable) at the dates indicated. In addition to these variables, the fair value of each portfolio is influenced by fluctuations in the notional amounts of the instruments and the discount rates used to determine the present values. The calculated results of the sensitivity analysis model do not reflect the impact that the same hypothetical price movement would have on the hedged exposures to which they relate.

We routinely review the effectiveness of our derivative instrument portfolios in light of current market conditions. If changes in market conditions or exposures warrant, the nature and volume of derivative instruments may change depending on the specific exposures being managed.

See Note 4 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report for additional information regarding our derivative instruments and hedging activities.

Interest Rate Hedging Activities

We may utilize interest rate swaps, forward starting swaps and similar derivative instruments to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates charged on borrowings under certain consolidated debt agreements. This strategy is a component in controlling our overall cost of capital associated with such borrowings. The composition of our derivative instrument portfolios may change from period-to-period depending on our hedging requirements. As presented in the tabular data below, each portfolio’s estimated fair value at a given date is based on a number of factors, including the number and types of derivatives outstanding at that date, the notional value of the swaps and associated interest rates.

Table of Contents

The following table shows the effect of hypothetical price movements (a sensitivity analysis) on the estimated fair value (“FV”) of our interest rate swap portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

		Interest Rate Swap Portfolio Aggregate Fair Value at
	Resulting	December 31,		June 30,		July 17,
Scenario	Classification	2011		2012		2012
FV assuming no change in underlying interest rates	Asset	$	67.2	$	25.6	$	29.6
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying interest rates	Asset		64.4		24.4		28.5
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying interest rates	Asset		70.0		26.9		30.8

The decrease in fair value of the interest rate swap portfolio since December 31, 2011 is primarily due to the settlement of 11 fixed-to-floating swaps in February 2012, which resulted in receipts totaling $37.7 million.

The following table shows the effect of hypothetical price movements (a sensitivity analysis) on the estimated fair value (“FV”) of our forward starting swap portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

		Forward Starting Swap Portfolio Aggregate Fair Value at
	Resulting	December 31,			June 30,			July 17,
Scenario	Classification	2011			2012			2012
FV assuming no change in underlying interest rates	Liability	$	(290.7	)	$	(230.6	)	$	(250.3	)
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying interest rates	Liability		(251.8	)		(205.8	)		(227.1	)
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying interest rates	Liability		(330.6	)		(255.8	)		(273.8	)

Due to a decrease in forward London Interbank Offered Rates in 2011, the fair value of our forward starting swap portfolio was a liability of $290.7 million at December 31, 2011. In connection with the issuance of Senior Notes EE in February 2012, we settled ten forward starting swaps having an aggregate notional value of $500.0 million, resulting in cash losses totaling $115.3 million. The fair value of the remaining forward starting swaps was a liability of $230.6 million at June 30, 2012 and $250.3 million at July 17, 2012. The $19.7 million increase in the liability between June 30 and July 17 is attributable to further decreases in forward London Interbank Offered Rates during July 2012.

In connection with EPO’s agreement to issue Senior Notes FF and Senior Notes GG in August 2012, we settled seven forward starting swaps having an aggregate notional amount of $350.0 million, resulting in cash losses totaling $70.2 million. Although we incurred cash losses upon settlement of our forward starting swaps in February 2012 and August 2012, we benefited from the exceptionally low interest rate environment during these periods relative to the interest rates in effect at the time we entered into the swaps. For information regarding the issuance of senior notes in August 2012, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Long-Term Debt” under Item 2 of this quarterly report.

Commodity Hedging Activities

Table of Contents

The objective of our natural gas processing strategy is to hedge an amount of gross margin associated with our natural gas processing activities. We achieve this objective by using physical and financial instruments to lock in the purchase prices of natural gas consumed as plant thermal reduction (“PTR”) and the sales prices of the related NGL products. This program consists of (i) the forward sale of a portion of our expected equity NGL production at fixed prices through December 2012, which is achieved through the use of forward physical sales contracts and commodity derivative instruments and (ii) the purchase of commodity derivative instruments having a notional amount based on the volume of natural gas expected to be consumed as PTR in the production of such equity NGL production.

At June 30, 2012, the program had hedged future remaining estimated gross margins (before plant operating expenses) of $596.7 million on 12.5 MMBbls of forecasted NGL sales transactions and equivalent PTR volumes extending through December 2012. At July 17, 2012, the program had hedged future remaining gross operating margin (before operating expenses) of $607.4 million on 13.1 MMBbls of forecasted NGL sales and equivalent PTR volumes extending through December 2012. Our estimates of future gross margins are subject to various business risks, including unforeseen outages or production declines, counterparty risk, or similar events or developments that are outside of our control.

§	The objective of our NGL, refined products and crude oil sales hedging program is to hedge the margins of anticipated future sales of inventory by locking in sales prices through the use of forward physical sales contracts and commodity derivative instruments.

§	The objective of our natural gas and refined products inventory hedging program is to hedge the fair value of natural gas and refined products currently held in inventory by locking in the sales price of the inventory through the use of commodity derivative instruments.

Certain basis swaps, basis spread options and other derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are used to manage market risks associated with anticipated purchases and sales of natural gas necessary to optimize our owned and contractually committed transportation and storage capacity. There is some uncertainty involved in the timing of these transactions often due to the development of more favorable profit opportunities or when spreads are insufficient to cover variable costs thus reducing the likelihood that the transactions will occur as originally forecasted. As a result of this timing uncertainty, these derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting even though they are effective at managing the risk exposures of these assets. The earnings volatility caused by fluctuations in non-cash, mark-to-market earnings cannot be predicted and the impact to earnings could be material.

The following table shows the effect of hypothetical price movements (a sensitivity analysis) on the estimated fair value of our natural gas marketing portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

		Portfolio Fair Value at
	Resulting	December 31,		June 30,		July 17,
Scenario	Classification	2011		2012		2012
FV assuming no change in underlying commodity prices	Asset	$	22.2	$	12.7	$	12.2
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying commodity prices	Asset		14.9		7.0		6.6
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying commodity prices	Asset		29.5		18.3		17.8

The following table shows the effect of hypothetical price movements (a sensitivity analysis) on the estimated fair value of our NGL, refined products and petrochemical operations portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

		Portfolio Fair Value at
	Resulting	December 31,			June 30,		July 17,
Scenario	Classification	2011			2012		2012
FV assuming no change in underlying commodity prices	Asset (Liability)	$	(12.3	)	$	60.5	$	34.4
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying commodity prices	Asset (Liability)		(32.2	)		26.2		(0.8	)
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying commodity prices	Asset		7.6			94.8		69.6

Table of Contents

The following table shows the effect of hypothetical price movements (a sensitivity analysis) on the estimated fair value of our crude oil marketing portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

		Portfolio Fair Value at
	Resulting	December 31,			June 30,			July 17,
Scenario	Classification	2011			2012			2012
FV assuming no change in underlying commodity prices	Liability	$	(7.6	)	$	(8.5	)	$	(9.8	)
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying commodity prices	Liability		(10.0	)		(13.8	)		(14.0	)
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying commodity prices	Liability		(5.0	)		(3.1	)		(5.6	)

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our general partner’s chief executive officer (Michael A. Creel, who is our principal executive officer) and chief financial officer (W. Randall Fowler, our principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on this evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, Mr. Creel and Mr. Fowler concluded:

(i)

that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures; and

(ii)	that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the second quarter of 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

The required certifications of Mr. Creel and Mr. Fowler under Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are included as exhibits to this quarterly report (see Exhibits 31 and 32 under Part II, Item 6 of this quarterly report).

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information regarding litigation matters, see Note 14, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Security holders and potential investors in our securities should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in our 2011 Form 10-K, in addition to other information in such annual report. The risk factors set

Table of Contents

forth in our 2011 Form 10-K are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any written or oral forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table summarizes our repurchase activity during the six months ended June 30, 2012:

Maximum

Total Number of

Number of Units

Average

Units Purchased

That May Yet

Total Number of

Price Paid

as Part of Publicly

Be Purchased

Period

Units Purchased

per Unit

Announced Plans

Under the Plans

February 2012 (1)

187,343

51.55

May 2012 (2)

186,048

49.82

(1) Of the 632,298 restricted common units that vested in February 2012 and converted to common units, 187,343 units were sold back to us by employees to cover related withholding tax requirements.

(2) Of the 604,054 restricted common units that vested in May 2012 and converted to common units, 186,048 units were sold back to us by employees to cover related withholding tax requirements.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Number	Exhibit*
2.1	Merger Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2003, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products Management LLC, GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and GulfTerra Energy Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003).
2.2	Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2004, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products Management LLC, GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and GulfTerra Energy Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2004).
2.3	Parent Company Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2003, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products GTM, LLC, El Paso Corporation, Sabine River Investors I, L.L.C., Sabine River Investors II, L.L.C., El Paso EPN Investments, L.L.C. and GulfTerra GP Holding Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003).
2.4	Amendment No. 1 to Parent Company Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2004, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products GTM, LLC, El Paso Corporation, Sabine River Investors I, L.L.C., Sabine River Investors II, L.L.C., El Paso EPN Investments, L.L.C. and GulfTerra GP Holding Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed April 21, 2004).

Table of Contents

2.5	Purchase and Sale Agreement (Gas Plants), dated as of December 15, 2003, by and between El Paso Corporation, El Paso Field Services Management, Inc., El Paso Transmission, L.L.C., El Paso Field Services Holding Company and Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003).
2.6	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 28, 2009, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Sub B LLC, TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed June 29, 2009).
2.7	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 28, 2009, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Sub A LLC, TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed June 29, 2009).
2.8	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 3, 2010, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise ETE LLC, Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. and EPE Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2010).
2.9	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 3, 2010, by and among Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. and EPE Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2010).
2.10	Contribution Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2010, by and between Enterprise Products Company and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed October 1, 2010).
2.11	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 28, 2011, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products Holdings LLC, EPD MergerCo LLC, Duncan Energy Partners L.P. and DEP Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed April 29, 2011).
3.1	Certificate of Limited Partnership of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2007).
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., filed on November 22, 2010 with the Delaware Secretary of State (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Form 8-K filed November 23, 2010).
3.3	Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., dated November 22, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed November 23, 2010).
3.4	Amendment No. 1 to Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., dated effective as of August 11, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed August 16, 2011).
3.5	Certificate of Formation of Enterprise Products Holdings LLC (formerly named EPE Holdings, LLC) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form S-1/A Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-124320, filed by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on July 22, 2005).
3.6	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Formation of Enterprise Products Holdings LLC (formerly named EPE Holdings, LLC), filed on November 22, 2010 with the Delaware Secretary of State (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form 8-K filed November 23, 2010).
3.7	Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Enterprise Products Holdings LLC dated effective as of September 7, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed September 8, 2011).
3.8	Company Agreement of Enterprise Products Operating LLC dated June 30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2007).
3.9	Certificate of Incorporation of Enterprise Products OLPGP, Inc., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form S-4 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-121665, filed December 27, 2004).

Table of Contents

3.10	Bylaws of Enterprise Products OLPGP, Inc., dated December 8, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Form S-4 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-121665, filed December 27, 2004).
4.1	Form of Common Unit certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed August 16, 2011).
4.2	Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2000, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and First Union National Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed March 10, 2000).
4.3	First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 22, 2003, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-102776, filed January 28, 2003).
4.4	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2003, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003).
4.5	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2007, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Original Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as New Issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.55 to Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2007).
4.6	Indenture, dated as of October 4, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed October 6, 2004).
4.7	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 4, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed October 6, 2004).
4.8	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 4, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K filed October 6, 2004).
4.9	Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 2, 2005, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed March 3, 2005).
4.10	Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 2, 2005, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed March 3, 2005).
4.11	Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 18, 2006, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed July 19, 2006).
4.12	Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 24, 2007, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed May 24, 2007).
4.13	Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2007, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Original Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as New Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.54 to Form 10-Q filed August 8, 2007).
4.14	Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 4, 2007, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed September 5, 2007).

Table of Contents

4.15	Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 3, 2008, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed April 3, 2008).
4.16	Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 3, 2008, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed April 3, 2008).
4.17	Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 8, 2008, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed December 8, 2008).
4.18	Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009).
4.19	Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 5, 2009, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed October 5, 2009).
4.20	Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2009, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.21	Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2009, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.22	Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 20, 2010, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010).
4.23	Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2011, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed January 13, 2011).
4.24	Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 24, 2011, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed August 24, 2011).
4.25	Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 15, 2012, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC, as Issuer, Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Parent Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2012).
4.26	Global Note representing $350.0 million principal amount of 6.375% Series B Senior Notes due 2013 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-102776, filed January 28, 2003).
4.27	Global Note representing $499.2 million principal amount of 6.875% Series B Senior Notes due 2033 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003).
4.28	Global Notes representing $450.0 million principal amount of 7.50% Senior Notes due 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed January 25, 2001).
4.29	Global Note representing $500.0 million principal amount of 5.60% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-123150, filed March 4, 2005).
4.30	Global Note representing $150.0 million principal amount of 5.60% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-123150, filed March 4, 2005).

Table of Contents

4.31	Global Note representing $350.0 million principal amount of 6.65% Series B Senior Notes due 2034 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-123150, filed March 4, 2005).
4.32	Global Note representing $250.0 million principal amount of 5.00% Series B Senior Notes due 2015 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 to Form 10-Q filed November 4, 2005).
4.33	Global Note representing $250.0 million principal amount of 5.75% Series B Senior Notes due 2035 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to Form 10-Q filed November 4, 2005).
4.34	Form of Junior Subordinated Note, including Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed July 19, 2006).
4.35	Global Note representing $800.0 million principal amount of 6.30% Senior Notes due 2017 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.38 to Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2007).
4.36	Form of Global Note representing $400.0 million principal amount of 5.65% Senior Notes due 2013 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed April 3, 2008).
4.37	Form of Global Note representing $700.0 million principal amount of 6.50% Senior Notes due 2019 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed April 3, 2008).
4.38	Form of Global Note representing $500.0 million principal amount of 9.75% Senior Notes due 2014 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed December 8, 2008).
4.39	Form of Global Note representing $500.0 million principal amount of 4.60% Senior Notes due 2012 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009).
4.40	Form of Global Note representing $500.0 million principal amount of 5.25% Senior Notes due 2020 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed October 5, 2009).
4.41	Form of Global Note representing $600.0 million principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2039 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed October 5, 2009).
4.42	Form of Global Note representing $490.5 million principal amount of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2012 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.43	Form of Global Note representing $182.6 million principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2013 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.44	Form of Global Note representing $237.6 million principal amount of 5.90% Senior Notes due 2013 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.45	Form of Global Note representing $349.7 million principal amount of 6.65% Senior Notes due 2018 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.46	Form of Global Note representing $399.6 million principal amount of 7.55% Senior Notes due 2038 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.47	Form of Global Note representing $285.8 million principal amount of 7.000% Junior Subordinated Notes due 2067 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.48	Form of Global Note representing $400.0 million principal amount of 3.70% Senior Notes due 2015 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010).
4.49	Form of Global Note representing $1.0 billion principal amount of 5.20% Senior Notes due 2020 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010).

Table of Contents

4.50	Form of Global Note representing $600.0 million principal amount of 6.45% Senior Notes due 2040 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed May 20, 2010).
4.51	Form of Global Note representing $750.0 million principal amount of 3.20% Senior Notes due 2016 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed January 13, 2011).
4.52	Form of Global Note representing $750.0 million principal amount of 5.95% Senior Notes due 2041 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed January 13, 2011).
4.53	Form of Global Note representing $650.0 million principal amount of 4.05% Senior Notes due 2022 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed August 24, 2011).
4.54	Form of Global Note representing $600.0 million principal amount of 5.70% Senior Notes due 2042 with attached Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed August 24, 2011).
4.55	Form of Global Note representing $750.0 million principal amount of 4.85% Senior Notes due 2042 with attached Guarantee (included in Exhibit 4.25 above).
4.56	Replacement Capital Covenant, dated May 24, 2007, executed by Enterprise Products Operating L.P. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. in favor of the covered debtholders described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed May 24, 2007).
4.57	First Amendment to Replacement Capital Covenant dated August 25, 2006, executed by Enterprise Products Operating L.P. in favor of the covered debtholders described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed August 25, 2006).
4.58	Replacement Capital Covenant, dated October 27, 2009, among Enterprise Products Operating LLC and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. in favor of the covered debtholders described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009).
4.59	Indenture, dated February 20, 2002, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Jonah Gas Gathering Company, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and First Union National Bank, NA, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 8-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on February 20, 2002).
4.60	First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 20, 2002, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Jonah Gas Gathering Company, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and First Union National Bank, NA, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 8-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on February 20, 2002).
4.61	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 27, 2002, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Jonah Gas Gathering Company, as Initial Subsidiary Guarantors, Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as New Subsidiary Guarantor, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, formerly known as First Union National Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Form 10-Q filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on August 14, 2002).
4.62	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated January 20, 2003, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P. as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P., Jonah Gas Gathering Company and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P. as Subsidiary Guarantors, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Form 10-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on March 21, 2003).
4.63	Full Release of Guarantee, dated July 31, 2006, by Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee, in favor of Jonah Gas Gathering Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Form 10-Q filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on November 7, 2006).

Table of Contents

4.64	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 30, 2007, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P., Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC and TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC, as Subsidiary Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed by TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC on July 6, 2007).
4.65	Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 27, 2008, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Form 10-Q filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on May 8, 2008).
4.66	Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 27, 2008, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Form 10-Q filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on May 8, 2008).
4.67	Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated March 27, 2008, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Form 10-Q filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on May 8, 2008).
4.68	Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 27, 2009, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on October 28, 2009).
4.69	Full Release of Guarantee, dated November 23, 2009, of TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P. by U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.64 to Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010).
4.70	Indenture, dated May 14, 2007, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Form 8-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on May 15, 2007).
4.71	First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 18, 2007, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on May 18, 2007).
4.72	Replacement of Capital Covenant, dated May 18, 2007, executed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P., TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P. in favor of the covered debt holders described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K of TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on May 18, 2007).
4.73	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 2007, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P. and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Existing Subsidiary Guarantors, TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC and TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC, as New Subsidiary Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed by TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC on July 6, 2007).
4.74	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2009, by and among TEPPCO Partners, L.P., as Issuer, TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P., as Subsidiary Guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K filed by TEPPCO Partners, L.P. on October 28, 2009).

Table of Contents

4.75	Full Release of Guarantee, dated as of November 23, 2009, of TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC, TCTM, L.P., TEPPCO Midstream Companies, LLC and Val Verde Gas Gathering Company, L.P. by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.70 to Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010).
10.1	Equity Distribution Agreement, dated May 31, 2012, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise Products OLPGP, Inc., Enterprise Products Operating LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Knight Capital Americas, L.P., Mizuho Securities USA Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., RBS Securities Inc., Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., UBS Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2012).
12.1#	Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and for each of the five years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
31.1#	Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Michael A. Creel for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.’s for the June 30, 2012 quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
31.2#	Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of W. Randall Fowler for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.’s for the June 30, 2012 quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
32.1#	Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Michael A. Creel for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.’s for the June 30, 2012 quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
32.2#	Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of W. Randall Fowler for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.’s for the June 30, 2012 quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
101.CAL#	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF#	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.INS#	XBRL Instance Document
101.LAB#	XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE#	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.SCH#	XBRL Schema Document

*	With respect to any exhibits incorporated by reference to any Exchange Act filings, the Commission file numbers for Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., TEPPCO Partners, L.P. and TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC are 1-14323, 1-32610, 1-10403 and 1-13603, respectively.
***	Identifies management contract and compensatory plan arrangements.
#	Filed with this report.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on August 9, 2012.

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

By:	Enterprise Products Holdings LLC, as General Partner


By:	/s/ Michael J. Knesek
Name:	Michael J. Knesek
Title:	Senior Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the General Partner