ENTEST GROUP, INC. - Quarter Report: 2014 May (Form 10-Q)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2014

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

Commission File No. 333-154989

ENTEST BIOMEDICAL, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

4700 Spring Street, St 304, La Mesa, California 91942

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

619 702 1404

(Issuer’s telephone number)

None

(Former name, address and fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☑   No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

As of May 31, 2014 there were 1,998,070,752 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ☐ No ☑

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One) Yes ☐   No ☑

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. - Financial Statements

The accompanying Notes are an integral part

of these Financial Statements

Entest BioMedical, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of May 31, 2014

NOTE 1.  BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The interim financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by Entest BioMedical, Inc. (“the Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein.  It is suggested that these condensed consolidated interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2013 and notes thereto included in the Company's 10-K annual report.  The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim reports.

NOTE 2.  ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 24, 2008 as JB Clothing Corporation.  Until July 10, 2009, the Company’s principal business objective was the offering of active/leisure fashion design clothing.

On July 10, 2009 the Company abandoned its efforts in the field of active/leisure fashion design clothing when it acquired 100% of the share capital of Entest BioMedical, Inc., a California corporation, (“Entest CA”).

The Company’s current business consists of the development and commercialization of immunotherapeutic therapies for the veterinary market as well as the acquisition and operation of veterinary hospitals.

NOTE 3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

The financial statements have been prepared using the basis of accounting generally accepted in the United States of America. Under this basis of accounting, revenues are recorded as earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred. The Company has adopted an August 31 fiscal year-end.   The Company recognizes revenue from services and product sales when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Product sales and service revenues are recorded when the products are delivered and title passes to customers. The customer’s credit card is authorized and charged, or checks/cash are received at the time the services are rendered, thereby providing reasonable assurance of collectability.

B. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Entest CA, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. Significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated.

C. USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

D. CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

E. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

As of May 31, 2014 Property and Equipment consists of $1,919 of Computer equipment. No depreciation expense has been recorded with regards to this equipment as it has yet to be put into service

F. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  A fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value:

Level 1:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2:  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities.

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments as of May 31, 2014 consisted of $ 384,043 of Notes Payable, $8,000 due to TheraCyte, Inc. and $1,878 due from an affiliate. The fair value of all of the Company’s financial instruments as of May 31, 2014 were valued according to the Level 3 input. The carrying amount of the financial instruments is equal to the fair value as determined by the Company.

The Company has determined that there are no Level 1 or Level 2 inputs for determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. Fair value was determined by the Company utilizing its own assumptions and estimation. There were no transfers between levels for the period presented.

G. INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method prescribed by ASC 740, “ Income Taxes. ” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in our financial statements. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of May 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013 the Company had no uncertain tax positions, and will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future.

The Company generated a deferred tax credit through net operating loss carry forward.  However, a valuation allowance of 100% has been established.

Interest and penalties on tax deficiencies recognized in accordance with ACS accounting standards are classified as income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10-50-19.

H.  BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 260, "Earnings Per Share", which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings (loss) per share for entities with publicly held common stock. ASC 260 requires the presentation of basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 260 effective from inception. Basic net loss per share amounts is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. All convertible debt has an anti-dilutive effect on the EPS, therefore Diluted earnings per share are the same as basic earnings per share.

NOTE 4.  RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The following accounting standards updates were recently issued and have not yet been adopted by us. These standards are currently under review to determine their impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

On January 31, 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update [ASU] 2013-01, entitled Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The guidance in ASU 2013-01 amends the requirements in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification [FASB ASC] Topic 210, entitled Balance Sheet. The ASU 2013-01 amendments to FASB ASC 210 clarify that ordinary trade receivables and receivables in general are not within the scope of ASU 2011-11, entitled Disclosure about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, where that ASU amended the guidance in FASB ASC 210. As those disclosures now are modified with the ASU 2013-01 amendments, the FASB ASC 210 balance sheet offsetting disclosures now clearly are applicable only where reporting entities are involved with bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions that either are offset using the FASB ASC 210 or 815 requirements, or that are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements. ASU 2013-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 On February 28, 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update [ASU] 2013-04, entitled Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date. The ASU 2013-04 amendments add to the guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification [FASB ASC] Topic 405, entitled Liabilities and require reporting entities to measure obligations resulting from certain joint and several liability arrangements where the total amount of the obligation is fixed as of the reporting date, as the sum of the following:

The amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among co-obligors.

Any additional amounts the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors.

While early adoption of the amended guidance is permitted, for public companies, the guidance is required to be implemented in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments need to be implemented retrospectively to all prior periods presented for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements that exist at the beginning of the year of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2013-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial position.

On April 22, 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update [ASU] 2013-07, entitled Liquidation Basis of Accounting. With ASU 2013-07, the FASB amends the guidance in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification [FASB ASC] Topic 205, entitled Presentation of Financial Statements. The amendments serve to clarify when and how reporting entities should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. The guidance is applicable to all reporting entities, whether they are public or private companies or not-for-profit entities. The guidance also provides principles for the recognition of assets and liabilities and disclosures, as well as related financial statement presentation requirements. The requirements in ASU 2013-07 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Reporting entities are required to apply the requirements in ASU 2013-07 prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2013-07 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial position.

Variety of proposed or otherwise potential accounting standards are currently under study by standard setting organizations and various regulatory agencies.  Due to the tentative and preliminary nature of those proposed standards, the Company’s management has not determined whether implementation of such standards would be material to its financial statements.

NOTE 5.  GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company generated net losses of $6,223,975 during the period from August 22, 2008 (inception) through May 31, 2014. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to meet its obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Management plans to raise additional funds primarily by offering securities for cash. Management has yet to decide what type of offering the Company will use or how much capital the Company will raise. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise any capital through any type of offerings.

NOTE 6.  NOTES PAYABLE  

As of May 31, 2014

Notes Payable:

Convertible Notes Payable

No Convertible Notes payable outstanding as of May 31, 2014 

As of August 31, 2013

Notes Payable:

Convertible Notes Payable

8% Convertible Notes Payable, $101,000

Bio Technology Partners Business Trust has provided a line of credit to the Company in the amount of $200,000 or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit of the Company by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion.   The unpaid principal of this line of credit bears simple interest at the rate of ten percent per annum. Interest is calculated based on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances or payments made hereunder. Principal balance and accrued interest shall become due and payable in whole or in part at the demand of the Lender. The Sherman Family Trust (10% Interest) has provided a line of credit to the Company in the amount of $700,000 or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit of the Company by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. The unpaid principal of this line of credit bears simple interest at the rate of ten percent per annum. Interest is calculated based on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances or payments made hereunder. Principal balance and accrued interest shall become due and payable in whole or in part at the demand of the Lender. $200,000 due to The Sherman Family Trust (0% Interest) is due and payable in whole or in part at the option of the Holder and bears no interest.

NOTE 7.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of May 31, 2014 the Company remains indebted to David R. Koos in the principal amount of $99,343  due and payable in whole or in part at the demand of David Koos and bearing simple interest at a rate of 15% per annum

As of May 31 , 2014 Bio-Matrix Scientific Group, Inc. (“BMSN”) , a major shareholder of the Company, is indebted to the Company in the amount of $1,878. This amount is non interest bearing and is due at the demand of the Company.

The Company allows BMSN and its affiliates ( entities under common control with the Company) to share office space with the Company at 4700 Spring Street, Suite 304, La Mesa California, 91941free of charge.

NOTE 8.  INCOME TAXES

As of  May 31, 2014  the Company has a Deferred Tax Asset of $2,120,791 completely attributable to net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $6,237,622  (which expire 20 years from the date the loss was incurred) consisting of:

(a) $ 13,647 of Net Operating Loss carry forwards acquired in the reverse acquisition of Entest BioMedical, Inc., a California corporation, and

(b) $ 6,223,975 of Net Operating Loss carry forwards attributable to Entest BioMedical, Inc.

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary differences and carry forwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In addition, the reverse acquisition in which Entest BioMedical, Inc. was involved in 2009 has resulted in a change of control.  Internal Revenue Code Sec 382 limits the amount of income that may be offset by net operating loss (NOL) carryovers after an ownership change. As a result, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance reducing all deferred tax assets to $ -0-.

Income tax is calculated at the 34% Federal Corporate Rate.

NOTE 9.  ACQUISITION OF ENTEST CA

On July 10, 2009 the Company acquired 100% of Entest CA, a California corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, from BMSN for consideration consisting of (a) the issuance to BMSN of 10,000,000 newly issued common shares of Entest and (b) the return by Mr. Rick Plote of 10,000,000 shares of Entest’s common stock previously issued to him by Entest for cancellation.

NOTE 10.  ACQUISITION OF THE ASSETS OF PET POINTERS, INC.

On January 4, 2011Entest CA acquired from Pet Pointers, Inc., a California corporation doing business as McDonald Animal Hospital (“Seller”), and Dr. Gregory McDonald DVM (“McDonald”) all the goodwill from McDonald and assets of Seller except cash and accounts receivables used in connection with the operation of a veterinary medical clinic located at 225 S. Milpas Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93103 (the "Business").

Consideration for the acquisition consisted of:

   I. $70,000 in cash

   II. $210,000 of the Company’s common shares valued at the closing price per share as of January 4, 2011

   III. Payment of no more than $78,000 to a creditor of the Seller to be paid in monthly installments of $1,500 per month

   IV. Payment of no more than $25,000 to additional creditors of the Seller to be paid in monthly installments of $825 per month

   V. Payment of $50,000 to McDonald on the first business day of the fourth month following the closing of the acquisition (“Closing”).

NOTE 11. DISPOSITION OF THE ASSETS OF PET POINTERS, INC.

On November 28, 2012 the “Company executed an agreement (“Agreement”) with Gregory McDonald ("McDonald"), Pet Pointers, Inc. ("Pet Pointer") whereby Mc Donald and Pet Pointer would acquire from the Company all assets (with the exception of cash and accounts receivable) utilized by the Company in the operation of the McDonald Animal Hospital, a full service veterinary clinic owned and operated by the Company and located in Santa Barbara, California (“McDonald Asset Sale”).

On October 10, 2012 a Complaint (“Complaint”) was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California against the Company and David Koos by McDonald, a former employee of the Company, alleging breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and dealing in connection with the assumption of lease obligations by the Company in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Pet Pointers, Inc breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and dealing in connection with an employment agreement enters into with McDonald inc connection with the Acquisition, breach of contract in connection with the Acquisition purchase agreement, breach of the covenant of good faith and dealing in connection with the Acquisition purchase agreement, implied indemnity in connection to amounts owed by McDonald to Anthony and Judi Marinelli, the Internal Revenue Service, and the California Franchise Tax Board, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation , failure to pay wages and violations of Sections 2802, 203, and 2806 of the California Labor Code. The Complaint sought judgment for nominal damages, actual damages, compensatory damages, lost wages, compensation, expenses wage benefits and penalties pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 203 et al, 2802 and 2806, indemnification, accrued interest, punitive damages, costs of suit and attorney’s fees.

As consideration to the Company for the assets acquired, McDonald and Pet Pointers provided to the Company a General release whereby McDonald and Pet Pointer waive, release and discharge the Company and their respective assignees, officers, directors, shareholders, boards, owners, employees, attorneys, agents, trustors, trustees, beneficiaries, heirs, successors, and representatives from all known and unknown claims, demands, causes of action, attorney's fees, costs, or expenses including: 

(1) All claims relating to the Complaint.

(2) Those owed by McDonald to Anthony and Judi Marinelli which the Company became obligated to pay on McDonald’s behalf pursuant to the asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company and Gregory McDonald and Pet Pointers, Inc on January 4, 2011.

(3) Those amounts owed by McDonald to the Internal Revenue Service which the Company became obligated to pay on McDonald’s behalf pursuant to the asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company and Gregory McDonald and Pet Pointers, Inc on January 4, 2011.

(4) Those amounts owed by McDonald to the California Franchise Tax Board which the Company became obligated to pay on McDonald’s behalf pursuant to the asset purchase agreement entered into between the Company and Gregory McDonald and Pet Pointers, Inc on January 4, 2011.

Assets disposed of pursuant to the Agreement include approximately $4,840 of Property Plant and Equipment net of accumulated depreciation as well as all inventory held at the McDonald Animal Hospital.

Assets disposed of pursuant to the Agreement also include 

(i) Essentially all intellectual property, including computer software, utilized in connection with the operation of the McDonald Animal Hospital

(ii) All telephone numbers, fax numbers, service marks, trademarks, trade names, fictitious business names, websites, business email addresses, vendor lists, promotional materials, vendor records and any and all business records including, but not limited to, such items stored in computer memories, microfiche, paper record or by any other means relevant to the operation of the McDonald Animal Hospital.

(iii) All customer lists, customer contacts, and any and all customer records that are related to the McDonald Animal Hospital.

As a result of the agreement, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax charge for the impairment of goodwill recorded in connection with the acquisition of the McDonald Animal Hospital of approximately $405,000 for the quarter ended November 30, 2012.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company is obligated to make payment of $13,000 within five days of the Closing of the Agreement as such term is defined in the Agreement.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agrees to waive, release and discharge McDonald and Pet Pointer from all known and unknown claims, demands, causes of action, attorney's fees, costs, or expenses.

NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to lease approximately 2,320 square feet of office space beginning December 1, 2011 for a period of five years.

Rent to be charged to the Company pursuant to the lease is as follows:

$2,996 per month for the period beginning December 1, 2011 and ending November 30, 2012

$3,116 per month for the period beginning December 1, 2012 and ending November 30, 2013

$3,241 per month for the period beginning December 1, 2013 and ending November 30, 2014

$3,371 per month for the period beginning December 1, 2014 and ending November 30, 2015

$3,506 per month for the period beginning December 1, 2015 and ending November 30, 2016

This property is utilized as office space. The Company believes that the foregoing property is adequate to meet its current needs. While it is anticipated that the Company will require access to laboratory facilities in the future, the Company believes that access to such facilities are available from a variety of sources.

On May 24, 2012, a Complaint (“Complaint”) was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon against the Company by Titterington Veterinary Services Inc. (“TVS”). The Complaint is an adversary proceeding filed by TVS arising from TVS’s bankruptcy case currently pending in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon. The Complaint alleges Breach of Contract resulting from the Company’s alleged failure to pay certain expenses the Company was required to pay pursuant to an agreement with TVS, Dr. Ronald Titterington, DVM and Dr. Kathy Snell, DVM (“TVS Agreement”). TVS is seeking a judgment and money award against the Company in an amount to be proven at trial which TVS estimates in the Complaint to be up to $50,000. TVS is also seeking a judgment and order against the Company to provide an accounting of all revenues received by the Company pursuant to the TVS Agreement, all expenses paid, unpaid, and due and owing  pursuant to the TVS Agreement as well as a revenue share which TVS claims is due them pursuant to the TVS Agreement. TVS is also seeking a judgment requiring the Company to turn over a sum of money equal to expenses the Company was obligated to pay pursuant to the TVS Agreement. TVS is also seeking attorney’s fees and expenses.  The Company believes that the allegations in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter. At this time, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters and an outcome unfavorable to the Company may have a material adverse effect on the Company. On September 19, 2012 the Plaintiff’s Claim for Relief for turnover and an accounting under 11 U.S.C. § 542 and the Plaintiff's Claim for Relief for attorney fees were dismissed with prejudice and , as per the claim of breach of contract, the proceeding was transferred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Southern California for all further proceedings. This Complaint was dismissed in its entirety on June 30, 2014.

.

There were no other legal proceedings against the Company with respect to matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not involved in any other litigation either as plaintiffs or defendants, and has no knowledge of any threatened or pending litigation against the Company.

NOTE 13. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

The stockholders' equity section of the Company contains the following classes of capital stock as of May 31, 2014:

Common Stock:

$0.0001 par value, 2,000,000,000 shares authorized and 1,998,070,752 shares issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2014.

Preferred Stock:

$0.0001 par value 5,000,000 shares authorized of which

(c) 300,000  are authorized as Series AAA Preferred Stock of which 80,000 shares are issued and outstanding  as of  May 31, 2014

Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary (collectively, a “Liquidation”), before any distribution or payment shall be made to any of the holders of Common Stock or any other series of preferred stock, the holders of Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive out of the assets of the Company, whether such assets are capital, surplus or earnings, an amount equal to $0.10 per share of Series B Preferred Stock (the “Liquidation Amount”) plus all declared and unpaid dividends thereon, for each share of Series B Preferred Stock held by them.

If, upon any Liquidation, the assets of the Company shall be insufficient to pay the Liquidation Amount, together with declared and unpaid dividends thereon, in full to all holders of Series B Preferred Stock, then the entire net assets of the Company shall be distributed among the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, ratably in proportion to the full amounts to which they would otherwise be respectively entitled and such distributions may be made in cash or in property taken at its fair value (as determined in good faith by the Board), or both, at the election of the Board..

Non Voting Convertible Preferred Stock having a $1.00 par value:

200,000 shares authorized of which 0 shares are issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2014 .

Non Voting Convertible Preferred Stock shall convert at the option of the holder into shares of the corporation’s common stock at a conversion price equal to seventy percent (70%) of the lowest Closing Price for the five (5) trading days immediately preceding written receipt by the corporation of the holder’s intent to convert.

“CLOSING PRICE" shall mean the closing bid price for the corporation’s common stock on the Principal Market on a Trading Day as reported by Bloomberg Finance L.P.

“PRINCIPAL MARKET" shall mean the principal trading exchange or market for the corporation’s common stock.

“TRADING DAY” shall mean a day on which the Principal Market shall be open for business.

NOTE 14. STOCK TRANSACTIONS

During the quarter ended May 31, 2014:

On March 3, 2014 the Company issued 125,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in satisfaction of $12,500 of principal indebtedness.

On March 13, 2014 the Company issued 140,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in satisfaction of $14,000 of principal indebtedness.

On March 28, 2014 the Company issued 155,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in satisfaction of $15,500 of principal indebtedness

On April 22, 2014 the Company issued 170,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in satisfaction of $17,000 of principal indebtedness

On May 16, 2014 the Company issued 125,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock in satisfaction of $12,500 of principal indebtedness.

On May 22, 2014 the Company issued 80,000 shares of Series AAA Preferred Stock to David R. Koos, the Company’s Chairman, President and CEO as consideration for $10,000 of salary accrued and unpaid owed to David R. Koos by the Company.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Information provided in this Quarterly report on Form 10Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E or Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are not historical facts and information. These statements represent the Company's expectations or beliefs, including, but not limited to, statements concerning future and operating results, statements concerning industry performance, the Company's operations, economic performance, financial conditions, margins and growth in sales of the Company's products, capital expenditures, financing needs, as well assumptions related to the forgoing. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Quarterly Report that are not statement of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and involve various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and outcomes for future periods to differ materially from any forward-looking statement or views expressed herein. The Company's financial performance and the forward-looking statements contained herein are further qualified by other risks including those set forth from time to time in the documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's most recent Form 10K for the year ended August 31, 2013. All references to” We”, “Us”, “Company” or the “Company” refer to Entest BioMedical, Inc.

Material Changes in Financial Condition

As of May 31, 2014, we had Cash on Hand of $1,096 and as of August 31, 2013 we had Cash on Hand of $9,610.

The decrease in Cash on Hand of approximately 89 %  is primarily attributable to expenses  incurred by the Company in the operation of its business and the reversal of $3,753 of credit card purchase revenues previously recognized by the Company’s discontinued subsidiary the McDonald Animal Hospital.

 As of May 31, 2014, we had Amounts Due from Affiliate of $1,878 and as of August 31, 2013 we had Amounts Due from Affiliate of $34,895.

The decrease in Amounts Due from Affiliate of approximately 94% is attributable to payments made to or on behalf of the Company by Bio matrix Scientific Group Inc. and/ or its affiliate Regen Biopharma, Inc.

As of May 31, 2014 we had Intangible Assets of $0 and as of August 31, 2013 we had Intangible Assets of $270.

The decrease in Intangible Assets of approximately 100% is primarily attributable to the recognition of amortization expense.

As of May 31, 2014 we had Notes Payable of $384,443 and as of August 31, 2013 we had Notes Payable of $272,644.

The increase in Notes Payable of approximately 41% is primarily attributable to:

Offset by:

As of May 31, 2014 we had Convertible Notes Payable of $0 and as of August 31, 2013 we had Notes Payable of $101,000.

The decrease in Convertible Notes Payable of 100% is attributable to conversions into the common shares of the Company.

As of May 31, 2014 we had Accrued Expenses of $143,221 and as of August 31, 2013 we had Accrued Expenses of $258,313.

The decrease in Accrued Expenses of approximately 44% is primarily attributable to:

Offset by accrual of salary due and payable to David Koos of $90,000 during the nine months ended May 31, 2014 as well as additional accruals of interest during the nine months ended May 31, 2014

Material Changes in Results of Operations

Revenues from continuing operations were $0 for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and -0- for the three months ended May 31, 2013.  Net Losses from continuing operations were $545,415 for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and $403,108 for the same period ended 2013.

The increase in Net Losses from continuing operations of approximately 38% is primarily attributable to recognition of expenses related to the issuance of shares below fair value during the three months ended May 31, 2014.

Revenues from continuing operations were $0 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and -0- for the nine months ended May 31, 2013.  Net Losses from continuing operations were $ 1,227,783 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and $ 1,248,269 for the same period ended 2013

The decrease in Net Losses from continuing operations of approximately 2% is primarily attributable to

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of  May 31, 2014 we had $1,096  cash on hand and current liabilities of $673,468 such liabilities consisting of Accounts Payable, Notes Payable, Amounts due to Affiliates and Others and Accrued Expenses.

We feel we will not be able to satisfy its cash requirements over the next twelve months and shall be required to seek additional financing.

We currently plan to raise additional funds primarily by obtaining governmental and non-governmental grants, offering securities for cash and acquiring existing veterinary clinics with the ability to generate cash flow to fund operations.

 
We have yet to decide what type of offering we will use or how much capital we will raise. There is no guarantee that we will be able to raise any capital through any type of offerings. We can give no assurance that any governmental or non-governmental grant will be obtained by us despite our best efforts. We cannot assure that we will be successful in obtaining additional financing necessary to implement our business plan.  We have not received any commitment or expression of interest from any financing source that has given us any assurance that we will obtain the amount of additional financing in the future that we currently anticipate.  For these and other reasons, we are not able to assure that we will obtain any additional financing or, if we are successful, that we can obtain any such financing on terms that may be reasonable in light of our current circumstances.

During the quarter ended May 31, 2014 the Company incurred net cash borrowings of $18,495.

We were not party to any material commitments for capital expenditures as of the end of the quarter ended May 31, 2014.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f) (1) of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item. We have chosen to disclose, however, that we have not engaged in any transactions, issued or bought any financial instruments or entered into any contracts that are required to be disclosed in response to this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of David Koos, who is the Company's Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of achieving the Company's disclosure control objectives. The Company's Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are, in fact, effective at this reasonable assurance level as of the period covered.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

In connection with the evaluation of the Company's internal controls during the period commencing on March 1, 2014 and ending on May 31, 2014, David Koos, who is both the Company's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer has determined that there were no changes to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that have been materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On May 24, 2012, a Complaint (“Complaint”) was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon against the Company by Titterington Veterinary Services Inc. (“TVS”). The Complaint is an adversary proceeding filed by TVS arising from TVS’s bankruptcy case currently pending in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon. The Complaint alleges Breach of Contract resulting from the Company’s alleged failure to pay certain expenses the Company was required to pay pursuant to an agreement with TVS, Dr. Ronald Titterington, DVM and Dr. Kathy Snell, DVM (“TVS Agreement”). TVS is seeking a judgment and money award against the Company in an amount to be proven at trial which TVS estimates in the Complaint to be up to $50,000. TVS is also seeking a judgment and order against the Company to provide an accounting of all revenues received by the Company pursuant to the TVS Agreement, all expenses paid, unpaid, and due and owing pursuant to the TVS Agreement as well as a revenue share which TVS claims is due them pursuant to the TVS Agreement. TVS is also seeking a judgment requiring the Company to turn over a sum of money equal to expenses the Company was obligated to pay pursuant to the TVS Agreement. TVS is also seeking attorney’s fees and expenses. The Company believes that the allegations in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter. At this time, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters and an outcome unfavorable to the Company may have a material adverse effect on the Company. On September 19, 2012 the Plaintiff’s Claim for Relief for turnover and an accounting under 11 U.S.C. § 542 and the Plaintiff's Claim for Relief for attorney fees were dismissed with prejudice and , as per the claim of breach of contract, the proceeding was transferred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Southern California for all further proceedings. This Complaint was dismissed in its entirety on June 30, 2014.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On March 3, 2014 the Company issued 125,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Shares”) in satisfaction of $12,500 of principal indebtedness.

The Shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriters were retained to serve as placement agents for the sale. The Shares were sold directly through our management. No commission or other consideration was paid in connection with the sale of the Shares. There was no advertisement or general solicitation made in connection with this Offer and Sale of Shares.

On March 13, 2014 the Company issued 140,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Shares”) in satisfaction of $14,000 of principal indebtedness.

The Shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriters were retained to serve as placement agents for the sale. The Shares were sold directly through our management. No commission or other consideration was paid in connection with the sale of the Shares. There was no advertisement or general solicitation made in connection with this Offer and Sale of Shares.

On March 28, 2014 the Company issued 155,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Shares”) in satisfaction of $15,500 of principal indebtedness

The Shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriters were retained to serve as placement agents for the sale. The Shares were sold directly through our management. No commission or other consideration was paid in connection with the sale of the Shares. There was no advertisement or general solicitation made in connection with this Offer and Sale of Shares.

 On April 22, 2014 the Company issued 170,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock ( Shares) in satisfaction of $17,000 of principal indebtedness

The Shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriters were retained to serve as placement agents for the sale. The Shares were sold directly through our management. No commission or other consideration was paid in connection with the sale of the Shares. There was no advertisement or general solicitation made in connection with this Offer and Sale of Shares.

On May 16, 2014 the Company issued 125,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Shares”) in satisfaction of $12,500 of principal indebtedness.

The Shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriters were retained to serve as placement agents for the sale. The Shares were sold directly through our management. No commission or other consideration was paid in connection with the sale of the Shares. There was no advertisement or general solicitation made in connection with this Offer and Sale of Shares.

On May 22, 2014 the Company issued 80,000 shares of Series AAA Preferred Stock (“Shares”) to David R. Koos, the Company’s Chairman, President and CEO as consideration for $10,000 of salary accrued and unpaid owed to David R. Koos by the Company.

The Shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No underwriters were retained to serve as placement agents for the sale. The Shares were sold directly through our management. No commission or other consideration was paid in connection with the sale of the Shares. There was no advertisement or general solicitation made in connection with this Offer and Sale of Shares. A legend was placed on the certificate that evidences the Shares stating that the Shares have not been registered under the Act and setting forth or referring to the restrictions on transferability and sale of the Shares.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Reserved

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.