Envela Corp - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-11048
DGSE Companies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 88-0097334 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
2817 Forest Lane
Dallas, Texas 75234
(972) 484-3662
(Address, including zip code, and telephone
number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Dallas, Texas 75234
(972) 484-3662
(Address, including zip code, and telephone
number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
NONE
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
August 10, 2007:
Class | Outstanding | |
Common stock, $.01 par value per share | 9,899,664 |
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
DGSE Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Unaudited | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,018,129 | $ | 1,210,282 | ||||
Trade receivables |
3,083,096 | 1,053,454 | ||||||
Inventories |
11,895,220 | 7,796,028 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
426,560 | 192,379 | ||||||
Prepaid federal income tax |
| 97,472 | ||||||
Total current assets |
16,423,005 | 10,349,615 | ||||||
Marketable securities available for sale |
57,879 | 57,879 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,373,212 | 1,024,405 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
18,031 | 7,152 | ||||||
Goodwill |
13,211,152 | 837,117 | ||||||
Other assets |
309,642 | 869,398 | ||||||
$ | 31,392,921 | $ | 13,145,566 | |||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 183,708 | $ | 183,708 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
259,273 | 259,273 | ||||||
Accounts payable trade |
2,122,517 | 828,323 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
459,673 | 721,305 | ||||||
Customer deposits |
552,654 | 171,912 | ||||||
Federal income tax payable |
102,929 | | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
3,680,754 | 2,164,521 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
7,862,881 | 4,303,685 | ||||||
11,543,635 | 6,468,206 | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value;
30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,470,357 and
4,913,290 shares issued and outstanding at
the end of each period in 2007 and 2006,
respectively |
94,704 | 49,133 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
18,374,867 | 5,708,760 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(132,245 | ) | (132,245 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
1,511,960 | 1,051,712 | ||||||
19,849,286 | 6,677,360 | |||||||
$ | 31,392,921 | $ | 13,145,566 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
1
Table of Contents
DGSE Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Unaudited | ||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||
Sales |
$ | 12,351,892 | $ | 12,444,265 | ||||
Consumer loan service charges |
125,162 | 101,788 | ||||||
Management fees |
100,000 | | ||||||
12,577,054 | 12,546,053 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
10,243,881 | 10,760,456 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,704,635 | 1,261,648 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
71,939 | 39,715 | ||||||
12,020,455 | 12,061,819 | |||||||
Operating income |
556,599 | 484,234 | ||||||
Other expense (income) |
||||||||
Interest expense |
137,896 | 73,975 | ||||||
Other income |
(2,251 | ) | | |||||
Earnings before income taxes |
420,954 | 410,259 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
143,121 | 139,488 | ||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 277,833 | $ | 270,771 | ||||
Earnings per common share basic |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Earnings per common share diluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares: |
||||||||
Basic |
5,320,964 | 4,913,290 | ||||||
Diluted |
6,731,618 | 5,045,242 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
2
Table of Contents
DGSE Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Unaudited | ||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||
Sales |
$ | 22,328,270 | $ | 22,072,918 | ||||
Consumer loan service charges |
238,587 | 194,132 | ||||||
Management fees |
250,000 | | ||||||
22,816,857 | 22,267,050 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
18,649,272 | 18,928,536 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
3,105,640 | 2,473,689 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
121,719 | 79,015 | ||||||
21,876,631 | 21,481,240 | |||||||
Operating income |
940,226 | 785,810 | ||||||
Other expense (income) |
||||||||
Interest expense |
245,136 | 150,581 | ||||||
Other income |
(2,251 | ) | | |||||
Earnings before income taxes |
697,341 | 635,229 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
237,093 | 215,978 | ||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 460,248 | $ | 419,251 | ||||
Earnings per common share basic |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.09 | ||||
Earnings per common share diluted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares: |
||||||||
Basic |
5,117,127 | 4,913,290 | ||||||
Diluted |
5,876,827 | 4,955,530 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Unaudited | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 460,248 | $ | 419,251 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
121,719 | 79,015 | ||||||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
(Increase) Decrease in trade receivables |
(787,467 | ) | (225,008 | ) | ||||
(Increase) Decrease in Inventories |
151,724 | (448,094 | ) | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets |
(470,052 | ) | (20,956 | ) | ||||
(Increase) Decrease in other long term assets |
(6,574 | ) | (150,831 | ) | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(209,052 | ) | (636,661 | ) | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in customer deposits |
261,929 | 42,482 | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in income taxes payable |
200,401 | 140,978 | ||||||
Net cash provided (used) in operating activities |
(288,754 | ) | (799,824 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Pawn loans made |
(340,725 | ) | (266,210 | ) | ||||
Pawn loans repaid |
215,453 | 218,069 | ||||||
Recovery of pawn loan principal through sale of forfeited collateral |
58,887 | 45,543 | ||||||
Pay day loans made |
(155,451 | ) | (126,770 | ) | ||||
Pay day loans repaid |
120,335 | 80,163 | ||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(103,529 | ) | (5,374 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of Euless Gold & Silver |
(600,000 | ) | | |||||
Deal Cost |
(395,280 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,200,310 | ) | (54,549 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from notes issued |
1,359,077 | 500,000 | ||||||
Repayments of notes payable |
(140,529 | ) | (489,964 | ) | ||||
Conversion of warrants |
78,363 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
1,296,911 | 10,036 | ||||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(192,153 | ) | (844,367 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
1,210,282 | 1,042,834 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 1,018,129 | $ | 98,467 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $110,219 and $68,655,
respectively.
Income taxes paid for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $0 and $75,000,
respectively.
Pawn loans forfeited and transferred to inventory amounted to $38,491 and
$24,028, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
Interest paid for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $209,238 and $148,595,
respectively.
Income taxes paid for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $50,000 and
$75,000, respectively.
Pawn loans forfeited and transferred to inventory amounted to $58,887 and
$45,543, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of DGSE Companies,
Inc. and Subsidiaries include the financial statements of DGSE Companies, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, DGSE Corporation, National Pawn, Inc., Charleston Gold and Diamond
Exchange, Inc., Superior Galleries, Inc. and American Pay Day Centers, Inc. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included.
The interim financial statements of DGSE Companies, Inc. included herein have been prepared by
us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have
been condensed or omitted pursuant to the Commissions rules and regulations, although we
believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. We
suggest that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006
and our quarterly report on Form 10Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007. In our opinion,
the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only
of those of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its results of operations and
cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain
reclassifications were made to the prior years consolidated financial statements to conform to
the current year presentation.
(2) Inventory.
A summary of inventories is as follows:
June 30,2007 | December 31 2006 | |||||||
Jewelry |
$ | 8,422,682 | $ | 7,022,453 | ||||
Rare coins |
2,587,846 | 235,099 | ||||||
Bullion |
343,660 | 113,867 | ||||||
Scrap gold |
334,571 | 374,284 | ||||||
Other |
206,461 | 50,325 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 11,895,220 | $ | 7,796,028 | ||||
(3) Trade Receivables.
Pawn loans receivable in the amount of $147,889 and $113,381 as of June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets caption trade receivables as of
these respective dates. The related pawn service charges receivable in the amount of $43,054 and
$32,340 as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, are also included in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets caption trade receivables as of these respective dates. Pay day loans receivable
in the amount of $95,073 as of June 30, 2007 and $61,887 as of June 30, 2006, respectively, are
also included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets caption trade receivables as of these
respective dates.
5
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(4) Earnings per share.
A reconciliation of the income and shares of the basic earnings per common share and diluted
earnings per common share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is as
follows:
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, | Three months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Earnings | Shares | Per share | Net Earnings | Shares | Per share | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 277,833 | 5,320,964 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 270,771 | 4,913,290 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
| 1,410.654 | (0.01 | ) | | 131,952 | | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 277,833 | 6,731,618 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 270,771 | 5,045,242 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Earnings | Shares | Per share | Net Earnings | Shares | Per share | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 460,248 | 5,117,127 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 419,251 | 4,913,290 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
| 759,700 | (0.01 | ) | | 42,240 | (.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 460,248 | 5,876,827 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 419,251 | 4,955,530 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||
(5) Business segment information.
Management identifies reportable segments by product or service offered. Each segment is
managed separately. Corporate and other includes certain general and administrative expenses not
allocated to segments and pawn operations. Our operations by segment for the six months ended
June 30 were as follows:
Retail | Wholesale | Rare | Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Jewelry | Jewelry | Bullion | Coins | Auctions | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 8,056 | $ | 2,843 | $ | 6,287 | $ | 4,622 | $ | 326 | $ | 683 | $ | 22,817 | ||||||||||||||
2006 |
7,560 | 2,303 | 9,591 | 2,518 | | 295 | 22,267 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
93 | 66 | 69 | 30 | 147 | 55 | 460 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
153 | 57 | 150 | 166 | | (107 | ) | 419 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
11,141 | 1,204 | 344 | 3,568 | 941 | 984 | 31,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
8,633 | 1,944 | 172 | 372 | | 694 | 11,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
| 837 | | | | 12,374 | 13,211 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
| 837 | | | | | 837 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Expenditures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
93 | | | | | 11 | 104 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
5 | | | | | | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
53 | | 5 | 5 | 5 | 54 | 122 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
48 | | | | | 31 | 79 |
6
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(5) Business segment information. (continued)
Our operations by segment for the three months ended June 30 were as follows:
Retail | Wholesale | Rare | Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Jewelry | Jewelry | Bullion | Coins | Auctions | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 4,105 | $ | 1,507 | $ | 2,944 | $ | 3,336 | $ | 326 | $ | 359 | $ | 12,576 | ||||||||||||||
2006 |
4,332 | 1,182 | 5,711 | 1,184 | | 137 | 12,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
31 | 23 | 16 | 21 | 147 | 40 | 278 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
113 | 33 | 88 | 98 | | (61 | ) | 271 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
11,141 | 1,204 | 344 | 3,568 | 941 | 984 | 31,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
8,633 | 1,944 | 172 | 372 | | 694 | 11,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
| 837 | | | | 12,374 | 13,211 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
| 837 | | | | | 837 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Expenditures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
22 | | | | | 8 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
2 | | | | | | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
29 | | 5 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
24 | | | | | 16 | 40 |
7
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(6) Stock-based Compensation.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R)
for all share based payment awards to employees and directors including employee stock options
granted under our employee stock option plan. As all options outstanding have vested prior to
December 31, 2005, no stock based compensation expense has been recorded as of June 30, 2007.
(7) Acquisitions.
Superior Galleries, Inc. On May 30, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Superior Galleries,
Inc., which we refer to as Superior, pursuant to an amended and restated agreement and plan of
merger and reorganization dated as of January 6, 2007, which we refer to as the merger
agreement, with Superior and Stanford International Bank Ltd., then Superiors largest
stockholder and its principal lender, which we refer to as Stanford, as stockholder agent for
the Superior stockholders, whereby Superior became a wholly owned subsidiary of DGSE Companies,
Inc. Superior operates a store in Beverly Hills, CA. The total purchase price of approximately
$13.6 million was broken down as follows:
Shares | Stock Price | Extended Price | ||||||||||
Common stock |
3,669,067 | $ | 2.55 | $ | 9,356,121 | |||||||
A warrants |
845,634 | 1.27 | (1) | 1,073,955 | ||||||||
B warrants |
863,000 | 2.55 | 2,220,650 | |||||||||
Exercise Price B warrants |
863,000 | $ | 0.001 | (863 | ) | |||||||
Direct transaction costs |
965,062 | |||||||||||
Total purchase price |
$ | 13,594,925 | ||||||||||
(1) | The $1.27 is the fair value of the warrants calculated under the Black Sholes method as of the acquisition date. |
The allocation of the purchase price is preliminary, and is pending the completion of
various analyses and finalization of estimates. The total purchase price has been allocated to
the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
Goodwill |
$ | 12,374,035 | ||
Property and other assets |
1,068,958 | |||
Inventory |
3,260,766 | |||
Liabilities assumed |
(3,108,834 | ) | ||
Total purchase price |
$ | 13,594,925 | ||
In accordance with SFAS 142, the goodwill will not be amortized but instead tested for
impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142 at least annually and more frequently
upon the occurrence of certain events.
The operating results of Superior have been included in the consolidated financial
statements since the acquisition date of May 30, 2007. The following unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 as if the acquisition of Superior had occurred on
January 1 of each year after giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments. These pro forma
results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of
what operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place at the beginning
of the period, and may not be indicative of future operating results (in thousands, except per
share data):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Pro forma total revenue |
$ | 14,857 | $ | 22,518 | $ | 30,700 | $ | 47,305 | ||||||||
Pro forma net earnings |
(2,433 | ) | (1,446 | ) | (3,386 | ) | (847 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net earnings per share basic |
$ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net earnings per share diluted |
$ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.34 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Pro forma weighted average shares basic |
9,889 | 9,889 | 9,889 | 9,889 | ||||||||||||
Pro forma weighted average shares
diluted |
10,049 | 10,021 | 10,023 | 9,931 |
8
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In relation to the acquisition, as of June 29, 2007, Stanford and Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman
and chief executive officer, collectively had the power to vote approximately 63% of our voting
securities, and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our voting securities on a
fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all options and warrants held by them
which are exercisable within sixty days of June 29, 2007 but not giving effect to the exercise of
any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders may have sufficient voting
power to control the outcome of virtually all corporate matters submitted to the vote of our
common stockholders. Those matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size
and composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations involving us,
or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and Dr. Smith have entered into a
corporate governance agreement with us, which entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate
two independent directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief executive
officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating officer, to be nominated to our
board for so long as each remains an executive officer.
Through this control of company nominations to our board of directors and through their voting
power, Stanford and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain decisions,
including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of officers, dividend policy,
access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of additional
equity securities), a merger or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition or
disposition of assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of Stanford and Dr.
Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company, even if
the change in control would benefit our other stockholders. The significant concentration of
stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors
perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
Euless Gold & Silver, Inc. On May 9, 2007 we purchased all of the tangible assets of Euless
Gold and Silver, Inc., located in Euless, Texas. The purchase price paid for these assets
totaled $1,000,000 including $600,000 in cash and a two year note in the amount of $400,000. We
opened a new retail store in the former Euless Gold & Silver facility and operate under the name
of Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange. Of the assets received, $990,150 was inventory and the
remainder was fixed assets.
We entered into these transactions seeing them as opportunistic acquisitions that would allow us
to expand our operations and provide a platform for future growth.
(8) New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measures (SFAS No. 157). SFAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances
disclosures about fair value measures required under other accounting pronouncements, but does
not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. SFAS
No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items
for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS No. 159 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. We
adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on our financial
statements for the quarter or six months ended June 30, 2007.
9
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(9) Recent Developments
On July 5, 2007 we reached a definitive agreement to sell our Corporate Headquarters in Dallas,
Texas to the Texas Department of Transportation for a cash purchase price of $1,299,900.
Additionally, we announced our agreement with 11311 Reeder Road
Holdings, LP to purchase over 3 acres with showroom and office facilities totaling 17,962 square
feet for $3,000,000, of which $551,557 will be paid in cash.
The sale of our headquarters is expected to close sometime in the third quarter of 2007 and the
purchase of our new property is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2007. By agreement
with the Texas Department of Transportation, we will continue to
occupy our current facility
until January of 2008.
On August 3, 2007 we announced the launch of Americangoldandsilverexchange.com along with the
simultaneous activation of over 900 proprietary Internet sites related to the home page of
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com. This site, along with our existing locations in Texas,
California and South Carolina, will provide customers from all over the United States with a
safe and seamless way to value and sell gold, silver, rare coins, jewelry, diamonds and watches.
We anticipate that Americangoldandsilverexchange.com will contribute to our growth and
profitability in future periods.
10
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as may, will, would, expect, intend, could,
estimate, should, anticipate or believe. We believe that the expectations reflected in
such forward-looking statements are accurate. However, we cannot assure you that these
expectations will occur. Our actual future performance could differ materially from such
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not
limited to:
| uncertainties regarding price fluctuations in the price of gold and other precious metals; | |
| our ability to manage inventory fluctuations and sales; | |
| changes in governmental rules and regulations applicable to the specialty financial services industry; | |
| the results of any unfavorable litigation; | |
| interest rates; | |
| economic pressures affecting the disposable income available to our customers; | |
| our ability to maintain an effective system of internal controls; | |
| our ability to assimilate the operations of our recent acquisitions; | |
| the other risks detailed from time to time in our SEC reports. |
Additional important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are discussed under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Forms 10-K for our fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006. You should not unduly rely on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated
to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
Our Business
We sell jewelry, rare coin and bullion products to both retail and wholesale customers throughout
the United States and make uncollateralized and collateralized loans to individuals. Our products
are marketed through our facilities in Dallas, Texas, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Mt. Pleasant,
South Carolina and Beverly Hills, California and through our five internet websites. Through
www.DGSE.com, we operate a virtual store and a real-time auction of our jewelry products.
Customers and we buy and sell items of jewelry and are free to set prices in an interactive
market. We also offer customers the ability to buy and sell precious metal assets. Customers have
access to our two-way markets in all of the most popularly traded precious metal products as well
as current quotations for precious metals prices on our other internet website,
www.USBullionExchange.com. www.FairchildWatches.com (Fairchild International) provides wholesale
customers a virtual catalog of our fine watch inventory. www.CGDEInc.com (Charleston Gold &
Diamond Exchange) provides information about our subsidiary and inventory available to purchase,
including fine watches, diamonds, rare coins and bullion, and jewelry. Over 7,500 items are
available for sale on our internet sites, including $2,000,000 in diamonds, consisting of both
inventory and consignments.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, National Pawn (f/k/a National Jewelry Exchange, Inc.), operates a
pawn shop in Dallas, Texas. We have focused the subsidiarys operations on sales and pawn loans
of jewelry products.
On May 30, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Superior Galleries, Inc. Superiors principal
line of business is the sale of rare coins on a retail, wholesale, and auction basis. Superiors
retail and wholesale operations are conducted in virtually every state in the United States.
Superior also provides auction services for customers seeking to sell their own coins. Superior
markets its services nationwide through broadcasting and print media and independent sales
agents, as well as on the internet through third party websites such as eBay.com, Overstock.com
and Amazon.com, and through its own website at SGBH.com. Its headquarters are in Beverly Hills,
California. For more information on this acquisition, see the section entitled Acquisitions
beginning on page 7.
In January 2005, we began offering unsecured payday loans through our wholly-owned subsidiary
American Pay Day Centers, Inc.
11
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Recent Developments
On July 5, 2007 we reached a definitive agreement to sell our Corporate Headquarters in Dallas,
Texas to the Texas Department of Transportation for a cash purchase price of $1,299,900.
Additionally, we announced our agreement with 11311 Reeder Road Holdings, LP to purchase over 3
acres with showroom and office facilities totaling 17,962 square feet for $3,000,000, of which
$551,557 will be paid in cash.
The sale of our headquarters is expected to close sometime in the third quarter of 2007 and the
purchase of our new property is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2007. By agreement
with the Texas Department of Transportation, we will continue to
occupy our current facility
until January of 2008.
On August 3, 2007 we announced the launch of Americangoldandsilverexchange.com along with the
simultaneous activation of over 900 proprietary Internet sites related to the home page of
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com. This site, along with our existing locations in Texas,
California and South Carolina, will provide customers from all over
the United States with a safe
and seamless way to value and sell gold, silver, rare coins, jewelry, diamonds and watches. We
anticipate that Americangoldandsilverexchange.com will contribute to our growth and profitability
in future periods.
Significant Accounting Policies
Inventory. Jewelry and other inventory is valued at lower-of-cost-or-market (specific
identification). Bullion inventory is valued at lower-of-cost-or-market (average cost).
Accounts Receivable. We record trade receivables when revenue is recognized. No product has
been consigned to customers. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is primarily determined by
review of specific trade receivables. Those accounts that are doubtful of collection are
included in the allowance. These provisions are reviewed to determine the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. Trade receivables are charged off when there is certainty as to
their being uncollectible. Trade receivables are considered delinquent when payment has not been
made within contract terms.
Revenue Recognition. Sales revenue consists of direct sales to customers for jewelry, rare coins
and bullion. Sales are recognized when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, which
is generally at the point-of-sale. Provisions for discounts, rebates, returns, bad debts, and
other adjustments are provided in the period the related sales are recorded.
Pawn loans (loans) are made with the collateral of tangible personal property for one month
with an automatic 60-day extension period. Pawn service charges are recorded at the time of
redemption at the greater of $15 or the actual interest accrued to date. If the loan is not
repaid, the principal amount loaned plus accrued interest (or the fair value of the collateral,
if lower) becomes the carrying value of the forfeited collateral (inventories) which is
recovered through sales to customers.
Our auction business generates revenue in the form of commissions received from buyers and
sellers of auction lots. Auction commissions include buyers commissions, sellers commissions,
and buyback commissions, each of which is calculated based on a percentage of the hammer price
(sale price). Buyers and sellers commissions are recognized upon the confirmation of the
identification of the winning bidders. Funds received from winning bidders include the hammer
price plus the commission. Only the commission portion of the funds received from winning
bidders is recorded as revenue.
Buyback commissions represent an agreed upon rate charged by us for goods entered in the
auction and not sold. Goods remain unsold when an auction lot does not meet the consignor
reserve, which is the minimum sales price as determined prior to auction, and when items sold at
auction are returned subsequent to the winning bidder taking possession. Buyback commission is
recognized along with sellers commission or at the time an item is returned. Returns from
winning bidders are very limited and primarily occur when a rare coin sold at auction has an
error in its description in which the winning bidder relied upon to purchase the item.
12
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Results of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Sales increased by $255,352 or 1.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to
2006. This increase was primarily the result of additional sales from the acquired locations of
Superior Galleries and Euless Gold & Silver, Inc. off set by a decrease in bullion revenue. The
decrease in bullion sales was the result of less volatile gold prices during the first six months
of 2007 as compared to 2006. Consumer loan service fees increased $44,455, or 22.9%, in 2007 due
to an increase in pay day loans outstanding during the period. Cost of goods as a percentage of
sales decreased from 85.8% in 2006 to 83.5% in 2007. This decrease was due to the decrease in
bullion revenue as a percentage of total sales and that the gross margins on bullion transactions
are generally low.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $631,951 or 25.5%, during the six
months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase
in staff and payroll related cost of $411,783 and higher advertising cost of $97,675. The
increase in staff was necessary to build our intra-structure in preparation for our recent
acquisitions, including Superior Galleries, Inc. and the opening of our new pawn shop in January
2007. The increase in advertising was necessary in order to attract new customers in our local
markets. Depreciation and amortization increased by $42,704, or 54%, during 2007 due to
additional assets being purchased in the first six months of 2007.
Income taxes are provided at the corporate rate of 34% for both 2007 and 2006.
Historically, changes in the market prices of precious metals have had a significant impact on
both revenues and cost of sales in the rare coin and precious metals segments in which we
operate. It is expected that due to the commodity nature of these products, future price changes
for precious metals will continue to be indicative of our performance in these business segments.
Changes in sales and cost of sales in the retail and wholesale jewelry segments are primarily
influenced by the national economic environment. It is expected that this trend will continue in
the future due to the nature of these products.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
Sales decreased by $92,373 or 0.7%, during the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to
2006. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in bullion sales offset by additional
sales from the acquired locations of Superior Galleries and Euless Gold & Silver, Inc. The
decrease in bullion sales was the result of less volatile gold prices during the second quarter
of 2007 as compared to 2006. Consumer loan service fees increased $23,374, or 23.0%, in 2007 due
to an increase in pay day loans outstanding during the period. Cost of goods as a percentage of
sales decreased from 86.5% in 2006 to 82.9% in 2007. This decrease was due to the decrease in
rare coin and bullion revenue as a percentage of total sales and that the gross margins on
bullion transactions are generally low.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $442,987 or 35.1%, during the three
months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase
in staff and payroll related cost of $327,557 and higher advertising cost of $71,830. The
increase in staff was necessary to build our intra-structure in preparation for our recent
acquisitions, including Superior Galleries, Inc. and the opening of our new pawn shop in January
2007. The increase in advertising was necessary in order to attract new customers in our local
markets. Depreciation and amortization increased by $32,224, or 81.1%, during 2007 due to
additional assets being purchased in the first six months of 2007.
Income taxes are provided at the corporate rate of 34% for both 2007 and 2006.
Historically, changes in the market prices of precious metals have had a significant impact on
both revenues and cost of sales in the rare coin and precious metals segments in which we
operate. It is expected that due to the commodity nature of these products, future price changes
for precious metals will continue to be indicative of our performance in these business segments.
Changes in sales and cost of sales in the retail and wholesale jewelry segments are primarily
influenced by the national economic environment. It is expected that this trend will continue in
the future due to the nature of these products.
13
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect capital expenditures to total approximately $125,000 during the next twelve
months. It is anticipated that these expenditures will be funded from working capital and our
credit facility. As of June 30, 2007 there were no commitments outstanding for capital
expenditures.
In the event of significant growth in retail and or wholesale jewelry sales, the demand for
additional working capital will expand due to a related need to stock additional jewelry
inventory and increases in wholesale accounts receivable. Historically, vendors have offered us
extended payment terms to finance the need for jewelry inventory growth and our management
believes that we will continue to do so in the future. Any significant increase in wholesale
accounts receivable will be financed under our bank credit facility.
Our ability to finance our operations and working capital needs are dependent upon managements
ability to negotiate extended terms or refinance its debt. We have historically renewed,
extended or replaced short-term debt as it matures and management believes that we will be able
to continue to do so in the near future.
From time to time, we have adjusted our inventory levels to meet seasonal demand or in order to
meet working capital requirements. Management is of the opinion that if additional working
capital is required, additional loans can be obtained from individuals or from commercial banks.
If necessary, inventory levels may be adjusted or a portion of our investments in marketable
securities may be liquidated in order to meet unforeseen working capital requirements.
Upon the consummation of our acquisition of Superior, and after the exchange by Stanford of $8.4
million of Superior debt for shares of Superior common stock, Superior amended and restated its
credit facility with Stanford. The amended and restated commercial loan and security agreement,
which we refer to as the loan agreement, decreased the available credit line from $19.89 million
to $11.5 million, reflecting the $8.4 million debt exchange. Interest on the outstanding
principal balance will continue to accrue at the prime rate, as reported in the Wall Street
Journal, or, during an event of default, at a rate 5% greater than the prime rate as so reported.
The new credit facility is split into two revolving loans of $5 million and $6.5 million. Loan
proceeds can only be used for customer loans consistent with specified loan policies and
procedures and for permitted inter-company transactions. Permitted inter-company transactions are
loans or dividends paid to us or our other subsidiaries. We guaranteed the repayment of these
permitted inter-company transactions pursuant to a secured guaranty in favor of Stanford. In
connection with the secured guarantee, Stanford and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., our primary lender,
entered into an intercreditor agreement with us, and we entered into a subordination agreement
with Superior, both of which subordinate Stanfords security interests and repayment rights to
those of Texas Capital Bank.
The new credit facility matures on May 1, 2011, provided that in case any of several customary
events of default occurs, Stanford may declare the entire principal amount of both loans due
immediately and take possession and dispose of the collateral described below. An event of
default includes, among others, the following events: failure to make a payment when due under
the loan agreement; breach of a covenant in the loan agreement or any related agreement; a
representation or warranty made in the loan agreement or related agreements is materially
incorrect; a default in repayment of borrowed money to any person; a material breach or default
under any material contract; certain bankruptcy or insolvency events; and a default under a
third-party loan.
Superior is obligated to repay the first revolving loan from the proceeds of the inventory or other collateral purchased with the proceeds of the loan.
Superior is obligated to repay the first revolving loan from the proceeds of the inventory or other collateral purchased with the proceeds of the loan.
The loans will be secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of
Superiors assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, promissory notes, books and records
and insurance policies, and the proceeds of the foregoing. In addition, pursuant to the secured
guaranty and intercreditor arrangements described above, Stanford will have a second-order
security interest in all of our accounts and inventory.
The loan agreement includes a number of customary covenants applicable to Superior,
including, among others: punctual payments of principal and interest under the credit facility;
prompt payment of taxes, leases and other indebtedness; maintenance of corporate existence,
qualifications, licenses, intellectual property rights, property and assets; maintenance of
satisfactory insurance; preparation and delivery of financial statements for us and separately
for Superior in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, tax returns and other
financial information; inspection of offices and collateral; notice of certain events and
changes; use of proceeds; notice of governmental orders which may have a material adverse effect,
SEC filings and stockholder communications; maintenance of property and collateral; and payment
of Stanford expenses.
14
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In addition, Superior has agreed to a number of negative covenants in the loan agreement,
including, among others, covenants not to: create or suffer a lien or other encumbrance on any
collateral, subject to customary exceptions; incur, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any
indebtedness, subject to customary exceptions; acquire indebtedness of another person, subject to
customary exceptions and permitted inter-company transactions; issue or acquire any shares of its
capital stock; pay dividends other than permitted inter-company transactions or specified
quarterly dividends, or directors fees; sell or abandon any collateral except in the ordinary
course of business or consolidate or merge with another entity; enter into affiliate transactions
other than in the ordinary course of business on fair terms or permitted inter-company
transactions; create or participate in any partnership or joint venture; engage in a new line of
business; pay principal or interest on subordinate debt except as authorized by the credit
facility; or make capital expenditures in excess of $100,000 per fiscal year.
We estimate that we will pay approximately $770,000 in interest during the next twelve months.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We
are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and gold values. We are also
exposed to regulatory risk in relation to its payday loans. We do not use derivative financial
instruments.
Our earnings and financial position may be affected by changes in gold values and the resulting
impact on pawn lending and jewelry sales. The proceeds of scrap sales and our ability to
liquidate excess jewelry inventory at an acceptable margin are dependent upon gold values. The
impact on our financial position and results of operations of a hypothetical change in gold
values cannot be reasonably estimated.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. An evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (1) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in internal controls. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, there have been no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
15
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 6, 2006 Superior Galleries was sued in the U.S. District Court for Central California by
Elaine and Dean Sanders in connection with a loan made to them against 32 coins placed on
consignment on June 26, 2004. Fourteen of the coins were sold, and the proceeds from this sale of
approximately $186,750 were insufficient to repay the remaining loan balance of $359,471 that
Superior made to the Sanders. The plaintiffs subsequently paid an additional $155,000 in December
2005 with respect to the loan, but now allege that Superior violated its agreement with them
relating to the sale of the coins. Superior strongly denies that it violated the agreement or
that it acted improperly in any way. The complaint seeks undefined dollar amounts, accrued
interest and reimbursement of plaintiffs legal costs.
In April 2004 Superior sued its former Chief Financial Officer, Malingham Shrinivas, in Los
Angeles Superior Court for breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy. In that lawsuit, Superior
alleged that he fraudulently arranged to receive more salary than he was entitled to, to pay
personal expenses using Superiors funds, and to pay third party vendors with Superiors funds
for services which were not rendered. In July 2004 Mr. Shrinivas filed a counterclaim in this
litigation, claiming that he was terminated without just cause and was therefore entitled to
$58,250 in severance pay. Although the case had been scheduled for trial in August 2006, prior
to that time the case was stayed by order of the Superior Court because the Court had been
advised that criminal charges against Mr. Shrinivas related to this matter were imminent. Those
criminal charges were subsequently filed and then dropped, and therefore further proceedings in
connection with the civil case will continue, but a trial date has not been scheduled. Superior
believes that Mr. Shrinivas was terminated with cause and that he is therefore not entitled to
any severance pay. If and when the stay of our civil case is terminated, Superior intends to
vigorously pursue its claims and defend Mr. Shrinivas claims for severance pay.
On November 7, 2006 Superior was sued in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Texas by a competitor, Heritage Numismatic Auctions, Inc. (Heritage). In its
complaint, Heritage alleges that Superior violated Heritages copyright rights by copying
Heritages catalog descriptions of certain coins and currency offered for sale by Heritage.
Heritage claims that these alleged actions also violate the California Unfair Competition Act.
Heritage seeks an injunction ordering Superior to cease the alleged acts of infringement and to
destroy the infringing items and damages in unspecified amounts. Superior denies that they have
infringed any of Heritages legal rights and intends to vigorously defend this suit. Superior
had reserved for its own legal costs, estimated to be $50,000.
We may, from time to time, be involved in various claims, lawsuits, disputes with third
parties, actions involving allegations of discrimination, or breach of contract actions
incidental to the operation of its business. Except as set forth above, we are not currently
involved in any such litigation which we believe could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
16
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Changes in customer demand for our products and services could result in a significant decrease
in revenues.
Although our customer base commonly uses our products and services, our failure to meet
changing demands of our customers could result in a significant decrease in our revenues.
Changes in governmental rules and regulations applicable to the specialty financial services
industry could have a negative impact on our lending activities.
Our lending is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and licensing requirements under
various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations. New laws and regulations could
be enacted that could have a negative impact on our lending activities.
Fluctuations in our inventory turnover and sales.
We regularly experience fluctuations in our inventory balances, inventory turnover and sales
margins, yields on loan portfolios and pawn redemption rates. Changes in any of these factors
could materially and adversely affect our profitability and ability to achieve our planned
results.
Changes in our liquidity and capital requirements could limit our ability to achieve our plans.
We require continued access to capital, and a significant reduction in cash flows from
operations or the availability of credit could materially and adversely affect our ability to
achieve our planned growth and operating results. Similarly, if actual costs to build new stores
significantly exceeds planned costs, our ability to build new stores or to operate new stores
profitably could be materially restricted. The DGSE credit agreement also limits the allowable
amount of capital expenditures in any given fiscal year, which could limit our ability to build
new stores.
Changes in competition from various sources could have a material adverse impact on our ability
to achieve our plans.
We encounter significant competition in connection with our retail and lending operations
from other pawnshops, cash advance companies and other forms of financial institutions and other
retailers, many of which have significantly greater financial resources than us. Significant
increases in these competitive influences could adversely affect our operations through a
decrease in the number or quality of payday loans and pawn loans or our ability to liquidate
forfeited collateral at acceptable margins.
In the coins and other collectibles business, we will compete with a number of comparably
sized and smaller firms, as well as a number of larger firms throughout the United States. Our
primary competitors are Heritage Auction Galleries, a large scale coin dealer and auctioneer, and
American Numismatic Rarities, a comparably-sized coin auctioneer. Many of our competitors have
the ability to attract customers as a result of their reputation and the quality collectibles
they obtain through their industry connections. Additionally, other reputable companies that sell
or auction rare coins and other collectibles may decide to enter our markets to compete with us.
These companies have greater name recognition and have greater financial and marketing resources
than we do. If these auction companies are successful in entering the specialized market for
premium collectibles in which we participate or if dealers and sellers participate less in our
auctions, we may attract fewer buyers and our revenue could decrease.
Our earnings could be negatively impacted by an unfavorable outcome of litigation, regulatory
actions, or labor and employment matters.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, regulatory actions and labor and
employment matters arising from our normal operations. Currently we are a defendant in several
actions. Although we believe the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operation or liquidity, there can be no assurance
as to the ultimate outcome of these or future actions.
17
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
A failure in our information systems could prevent us from effectively managing and controlling
our business or serving our customers.
We rely on our information systems to manage and operate our stores and business. Each store
is part of an information network that permits us to maintain adequate cash inventory, reconcile
cash balances daily and report revenues and expenses timely. Any disruption in the availability
of our information systems could adversely affect our operation, the ability to serve our
customers and our results of operations.
A failure of our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, or our inability to
comply with the requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely fashion could
have a material adverse impact on us and our investors confidence in our reported financial
information.
Effective internal controls and disclosure controls and processes are necessary for us to
provide reliable financial reports and to detect and prevent fraud. We are currently performing
the system and process evaluation required to comply with the management certification and
auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This evaluation may
conclude that enhancements, modifications or changes to our controls are necessary. Completing
this evaluation, performing testing and implementing any required remedial changes will require
significant expenditures and management attention. We cannot be certain as to the timing of
completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or the impact of these on our
operations. We cannot be certain that significant deficiencies or material weaknesses will not be
identified, or that remediation efforts will be timely to allow us to comply with the
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we are unable to comply with the
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, investors could lose confidence in our
reported financial information.
Changes in general economic conditions could negatively affect loan performance and demand for
our products and services.
A sustained deterioration in the economic environment could adversely affect our operations
by reducing consumer demand for the products we sell.
Interest rate fluctuations could increase our interest expense.
Although the U.S. Federal Reserve halted a sustained period of regular interest rate hikes
in August 2006, interest rates could continue to rise which would, in turn, increase our cost of
borrowing.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate management and other skilled
employees.
Our future success and growth depend on the continued services of our key management and
employees. The loss of the services of any of these individuals or any other key employee or
contractor could materially affect our business. Our future success also depends on our ability
to identify, attract and retain additional qualified personnel. Competition for employees in our
industry is intense and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining them. There are a
limited number of people with knowledge of, and experience in, our industry. We do not have
employment agreements with many of our key employees. We do not maintain life insurance polices
on many of our employees. Our loss of key personnel, especially without advance notice, or our
inability to hire or retain qualified personnel, could have a material adverse effect on sales
and our ability to maintain our technological edge. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to
retain our key management and skilled personnel, or that we will be able to attract, assimilate
and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.
The voting power in our company is substantially controlled by a small number of stockholders,
which may, among other things, delay or frustrate the removal of incumbent directors or a
takeover attempt, even if such events may be beneficial to our stockholders.
As of June 29, 2007, Stanford International Bank Ltd., which we refer to as Stanford, and
Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, collectively had the power to vote
approximately 63% of our voting securities, and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our
voting securities on a fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all options
and warrants held by them which are exercisable within sixty days of June 29, 2007 but not giving
effect to the exercise of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders
may have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of virtually all corporate matters
submitted to the vote of our common stockholders. Those matters could include the election of
directors, changes in the size and composition of our board of directors, mergers and other
business combinations involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and
Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which entitles Stanford
18
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
and
Dr. Smith to each nominate two independent directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our
chairman and chief executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating
officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as he remains an executive officer.
Through this control of company nominations to our board of directors and through their
voting power, Stanford and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain
decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of officers, dividend
policy, access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of
additional equity securities), a merger or consolidation with another company, and our
acquisition or disposition of assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of
Stanford and Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our
company, even if the change in control would benefit our other stockholders. The significant
concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due
to investors perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
We could be subject to sales taxes, interest and penalties on interstate sales for which we have
not collected taxes.
Superior has not collected California sales tax on mail-order sales to out-of-state
customers, nor has it collected use tax on its interstate mail order sales. We believe that our
sales to interstate customers are generally tax-exempt due to varying state exemptions relative
to the definitions of being engaged in business in particular states and the lack of current
Internet taxation. While we have not been contacted by any state authorities seeking to enforce
sales or use tax regulations, we cannot assure you that we will not be contacted by authorities
in the future with inquiries concerning our compliance with current statutes, nor can we assure
you that future statutes will not be enacted that affect the sales and use tax aspects of our
business.
We may incur losses as a result of accumulating inventory.
In addition to auctioning rare coins on consignment, a substantial portion of the rare coins
that Superior sells comes from its own inventory. Superior purchases these rare coins from
dealers and collectors and assumes the inventory and price risks of these items until they are
sold. If Superior is unable to resell the rare coins that it purchases when it wants or needs to,
or at prices sufficient to generate a profit from their resale, or if the market value of the
inventory of purchased rare coins were to decline, our revenue would likely decline.
If we experience an increase in the rescission of sales, our revenue and profitability could
decrease.
Our operating results could suffer if we experience a significant increase in the number of
sales that are rescinded due to questions about title, provenance or authenticity of an item.
Superior warrants the title, provenance and authenticity of each item that it sells at auction. A
buyer who believes that any of these characteristics is in doubt must notify Superior in writing
within a certain number of days after the date of sale of the property. If Superior cannot
substantiate the questioned characteristics, the buyer may rescind the purchase and Superior will
refund the price paid at auction to the buyer. When a purchase is rescinded, the seller is
required to refund the items sale price less sellers commissions and other sellers fees.
Our planned expansion and enhancement of our website and internet operations may not result in
increased profitability.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our website and network
infrastructure are and will be critical to our reputation and our ability to attract and retain
customers and technical personnel and to maintain adequate customer service levels. Any system
interruptions or reduced performance of our website could materially adversely affect our
reputation and our ability to attract new customers and technical personnel. We are in the
process of development and/or enhancement of several portions of our websites that will offer
content and auctions for rare coins that may have a lower average selling price than many of the
rare coins in the markets we currently serve, and in the future we plan to integrate various of
our websites. Continued development of our websites will require significant resources and
expense. If the planned expansion of our websites does not result in increased revenue, we may
experience decreased profitability.
Our websites may be vulnerable to security breaches and similar threats which could result in our
liability for damages and harm to our reputation.
Despite the implementation of network security measures, our websites are vulnerable to
computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptive problems caused by internet users. These
occurrences could result in our liability for damages, and our reputation could suffer. The
circumvention of our security measures may result in the misappropriation of customer or other
19
Table of Contents
DGSE COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
confidential information. Any such security breach could lead to interruptions and delays and the
cessation of service to our customers and could result in a decline in revenue and income.
Changes to financial accounting standards and new exchange rules could make it more expensive to
issue stock options to employees, which would increase compensation costs and may cause us to
change our business practices.
We prepare our financial statements to conform with generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, in the United States. These accounting principles are subject to
interpretation by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and various other
bodies. A change in those policies could have a significant effect on our reported results and
may affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced.
We are subject to new corporate governance and internal control reporting requirements, and our
costs related to compliance with, or our failure to comply with existing and future requirements
could adversely affect our business.
We face new corporate governance requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well
as new rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board and the Nasdaq Capital Market. These laws, rules and regulations continue to
evolve and may become increasingly stringent in the future. In particular, we will be required to
include managements report on internal controls as part of our annual report for the year ending
December 31, 2007 pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We are in the process of
evaluating our control structure to help ensure that we will be able to comply with Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully comply with these
laws, rules and regulations that address corporate governance, internal control reporting and
similar matters. Failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could materially
adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and the value and liquidity of our
securities.
The revolving credit facilities with Stanford International Bank Ltd. and Texas Capital Bank,
N.A. is each collateralized by a general security interest in our assets. If we were to default
under the terms of either credit facility, the lender would have the right to foreclose on our
assets.
In December 2005, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank, N.A.,
which currently permits borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of $4.3 million. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security interest in
substantially all of our assets (other than the assets of Superior). As of June 26, 2007,
approximately $4.3 million was outstanding under the term loan and revolving credit facility. If
we were to default under the terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Texas Capital
Bank would have the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on our assets
in order to satisfy our indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material adverse effect on
our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial position.
In October 2003, Superior entered into a revolving credit facility with Stanford Financial
Group Company, which we refer to as SFG, which has assigned the facility to Stanford. The
facility currently permits borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of $11.5 million, up to $6
million of which Superior may upstream to DGSE. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility
are collateralized by a general security interest in substantially all of Superiors assets and,
to the extent of money upstreamed to DGSE, substantially all of DGSEs assets. As of June 26,
2007, approximately $2.8 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility. If Superior
were to default under the terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Stanford would
have the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on Superiors assets,
and, subject to intercreditor arrangements with Texas Capital Bank and other limitations, our
assets, in order to satisfy Superiors indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material
adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial position.
We have not paid dividends on our common stock in the past and do not anticipate paying dividends
on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We have not paid common stock dividends since our inception and do not anticipate paying
dividends in the foreseeable future. Our current business plan provides for the reinvestment of
earnings in an effort to complete development of our technologies and products, with the goal of
increasing sales and long-term profitability and value. In addition, our revolving credit
facility with Texas Capital Bank currently restricts, and any other credit or borrowing
arrangements that we may enter into may in the future restrict or limit, our ability to pay
dividends to our stockholders.
20
Table of Contents
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
On May 22, 2007, we held a special meeting of shareholders to (1) adopt and approve the Amended
and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, entered into as of January 6, 2007,
by and among DGSE Companies, Inc., DGSE Merger Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DGSE, Superior
Galleries, Inc. and Stanford International Bank Ltd., as stockholder agent, and to approve the
merger and reorganization contemplated thereby, including the issuance of shares of DGSE common
stock to Superior stockholders, and the issuance of options and warrants to acquire shares of
DGSE common stock, pursuant to the merger agreement, (2) approve an amendment to DGSEs articles
of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock by 20,000,000
shares, to a total of 30,000,000 shares, and (3) adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the proposals.
The voting on the above proposals was as follows:
Proposal | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||
To adopt and approve the Amended and
Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger
and Reorganization |
3,275,718 | 2,500 | 1,520 | |||||||||
To approve an amendment to DGSEs
articles of incorporation to increase
the number of authorized shares of
common stock by 20,000,000 shares, to
a total of 30,000,000 shares |
3,267,773 | 10,745 | 1,220 | |||||||||
To adjourn the special meeting, if
necessary, to solicit additional
proxies if there are not sufficient
votes in favor of the proposals |
3,262,203 | 10,011 | 7,524 |
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit | Filed | Incorporated | Date Filed | Exhibit | ||||||||||
No. | Description | Herein | by Reference | Form | with SEC | No. | ||||||||
2.1 |
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of January 6, 2007 | × | 8-K | January 9, 2007 | 2.1 | |||||||||
2.2
|
Limited Joinder Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2007 | × | 8-K | January 9, 2007 | 2.9 | |||||||||
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation dated September 17, 1965 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.1 | |||||||||
3.2
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated October 14, 1981 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.2 | |||||||||
3.3
|
Certificate of Resolution, dated October 14, 1981 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.3 |
21
Table of Contents
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Exhibit | Filed | Incorporated | Date Filed | Exhibit | ||||||||||
No. | Description | Herein | by Reference | Form | with SEC | No. | ||||||||
3.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation , dated July 15, 1986 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.4 | |||||||||
3.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated August 23, 1998 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.5 | |||||||||
3.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26, 1992 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.6 | |||||||||
3.7
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26, 2001 | × | 8-K | July 3, 2001 | 1.0 | |||||||||
3.8
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated May 22, 2007 | x | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 3.1 | |||||||||
3.9
|
By-laws, dated March 2, 1992 | × | 8-A12G | June 23, 1999 | 3.7 | |||||||||
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate |
× | S-4 | January 6, 2007 | 4.1 | |||||||||
10.1
|
Renewal, Extension And Modification Agreement dated January 28, 1994, by and among DGSE Corporation and Michael E. Hall And Marian E. Hall | × | 10-KSB | March 1995 | 10.2 | |||||||||
10.2
|
Lease Agreement dated June 2, 2000 by and between SND Properties and Charleston Gold and Diamond Exchange, Inc. | × | 10-KSB | March 29, 2001 | 10.1 | |||||||||
10.3
|
Lease agreement dated October 5, 2004 by and between Beltline Denton Road Associates and Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange | × | 10-K | April 15, 2005 | 10.2 | |||||||||
10.4
|
Lease agreement dated December 1, 2004 by and between Stone Lewis Properties and Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange | × | 10-K | April 15, 2005 | 10.3 | |||||||||
10.5
|
Lease agreement dated November 18, 2004 by and between Hinkle Income Properties LLC and American Pay Day Centers, Inc. | × | 10-K | April 15, 2005 | 10.4 |
22
Table of Contents
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Exhibit | Filed | Incorporated | Date Filed | Exhibit | ||||||||||
No. | Description | Herein | by Reference | Form | with SEC | No. | ||||||||
10.6
|
Lease Agreement dated January 17, 2005 by and between Belle-Hall Development Phase III Limited Partnership and DGSE Companies, Inc. | × | S-4 | January 6, 2007 | 10.6 | |||||||||
10.7
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. | × | 8-K/A | August 17, 2006 | 10.1 | |||||||||
10.8
|
Third Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2007, by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. | × | 8-K | May 9, 2007 | 3.0 | |||||||||
10.9
|
Support Agreement, DGSE stockholders, dated as of January 6, 2007 | × | 8-K | January 9, 2007 | 99.1 | |||||||||
10.10
|
Securities Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2007 | × | 8-K | January 9, 2007 | 99.2 | |||||||||
10.11
|
Warrant to DiGenova, issued January 6, 2007 | × | 8-K | January 9, 2007 | 99.3 | |||||||||
10.12
|
Support Agreement, Superior stockholders, dated as of January 6, 2007 | × | 8-K | January 9, 2007 | 99.5 | |||||||||
10.13
|
Asset purchase agreement, dated May 9, 2007, by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Euless Gold & Silver, Inc. | × | 8-K | May 9, 2007 | 1.0 | |||||||||
10.14
|
Subordinated Promissory Note dated May 9, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 9, 2007 | 2.0 | |||||||||
10.15
|
Registration Rights Agreement with Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.1 | |||||||||
10.16
|
Corporate Governance Agreement with Dr. L.S. Smith and Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.2 |
23
Table of Contents
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Exhibit | Filed | Incorporated | Date Filed | Exhibit | ||||||||||
No. | Description | Herein | by Reference | Form | with SEC | No. | ||||||||
10.17
|
Escrow Agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Stanford International Bank Ltd., as stockholder agent, dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.3 | |||||||||
10.18
|
Form of Warrants | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.4 | |||||||||
10.19
|
Amended and Restated Commercial Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Superior Galleries Inc. and Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.5 | |||||||||
10.20
|
Employment Agreement with L.S. Smith, dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.6 | |||||||||
10.21
|
Employment Agreement with William H. Oyster, dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.7 | |||||||||
10.22
|
Employment Agreement with John Benson, dated as of May 30, 2007 | × | 8-K | May 31, 2007 | 99.8 | |||||||||
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S. Smith | × | ||||||||||||
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John Benson | × | ||||||||||||
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S. Smith | × | ||||||||||||
32.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John Benson | × |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K :
None.
24
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DGSE Companies, Inc.
By:
|
/s/ L. S. Smith | Dated: August 14, 2007 | ||||
Chairman of the Board, | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer and | ||||||
Secretary |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
By:
|
/s/ L. S. Smith | Dated: August 14, 2007 | ||||
Chairman of the Board, | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer and | ||||||
Secretary | ||||||
By:
|
/s/ W. H. Oyster | Dated: August 14, 2007 | ||||
Director, President and | ||||||
Chief Operating Officer | ||||||
By:
|
/s/ John Benson | Dated: August 14, 2007 | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |