Envela Corp - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
FOR
ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File No. 001-11048
_______________________________
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
88-0097334
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
11311
Reeder Road
Dallas,
Texas 75229
972-484-3662
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone
number,
including area code, of registrant's
principal
executive offices)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par
value $.01 per share
|
(Title
of Class)
|
_______________________________
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES
o
|
NO
þ
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
YES
o
|
NO
þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
þ
|
NO
o
|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure
of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form
10-K. þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “larger accelerated filer,” “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
Reporting Company þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o
|
NO
þ
|
Aggregate
market value of the 3,774,762 shares of Common Stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant at the
closing sales price as reported on the NYSE Amex on June 30,
2008
|
$11,022,305 | |||
Number
of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business
on March
27,
2009:
|
9,833,635 |
Documents
incorporated by reference:
Portions
of the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of DGSE Companies, Inc. are incorporated by reference into Part III
of this report.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
PART
I
Item
1.
|
Business
|
1
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
8
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
14
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
14
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
14
|
PART
II
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
15
|
Item
7.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
|
20
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
21
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
21
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
22
|
PART
III
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
22
|
PART
IV
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
23
|
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS.
Overview
Unless the context indicates otherwise,
references to "we," "us", "our" and ”DGSE” refers to the consolidated business
operations of DGSE Companies, Inc., the parent, and all of its direct and
indirect subsidiaries.
We buy
and sell jewelry, bullion products and rare coins. Our customers
include individual consumer, dealers and institutions throughout the United
States. In addition, we make collateralized loans to individuals in
the State of Texas. Our products and services are marketed through
our facilities in Dallas and Euless, Texas; Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina;
Woodland Hills, California and through our internet web sites DGSE.com;
CGDEinc.com; SGBH.com;
SuperiorPreciousMetals.com; SuperiorEstateBuyers.com; USBullionExchange.com;
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com; and FairchildWatches.com.
We
operate eight primary internet sites and over 900 related landing sites on the
World Wide Web. Through the various sites we operate a virtual store,
real-time auction of rare coin and jewelry products, free quotations of current
prices on all commonly traded precious metal and related products, trading in
precious metals, a mechanism for selling unwanted jewelry, rare coins and
precious metals and wholesale prices and information exclusively for dealers on
pre-owned fine watches. Over 7,500 items are available for sale on our internet
sites including $2,000,000 in diamonds.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, National
Jewelry Exchange, Inc, (dba National Pawn), operates two pawn shops in
Dallas, Texas. We have focused the subsidiary’s
operations on sales and pawn loans of jewelry products.
On May 9, 2007 we purchased all of the
tangible assets of Euless Gold and Silver, Inc., located in Euless, Texas. We opened a new retail
store in the former Euless Gold & Silver facility and it operates under the name of Dallas Gold &
Silver Exchange.
On May 30, 2007, we completed the
acquisition of Superior Galleries, Inc. located in Beverly Hills, California. In June 2008, we moved
Superior Galleries operations from Beverly Hills to Woodland Hills, California. Superior’s principal line of business is the
sale of rare coins on a retail and wholesale basis. Superior’s retail and wholesale operations are
conducted in virtually every state in the United States. Superior also conducted live and internet
auctions for customers seeking to sell their own coins prior to management’s
decision to discontinue the live auction operations. Superior markets its services nationwide through
broadcast and print media and independent sales agents, as well as on the
internet through third party websites, and through its own website at
SGBH.com.
On July
13, 2007, we sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations
and discontinued operations in those locations.
On August
3, 2007 we announced the launch of Americangoldandsilverexchange.com along with
the simultaneous activation of over 900 proprietary Internet sites related to
the home page of Americangoldandsilverexchange.com. This site, along
with our existing locations in Texas, California and South Carolina, provides
customers from all over the United States with a seamless and secure way to
value and sell gold, silver, rare coins, jewelry, diamonds and
watches.
Late in
2007, Superior Estate Buyers was launched to bring our unique expertise in the
purchase of gold, silver, diamonds, rare coins and other collectibles to local
markets with a team of traveling professionals for short-term buying events.
During 2008 Superior Estate Buyers held approximately 24 such buying
events. It is our expectation that, over time, this activity will be
expanded significantly with the objective of having teams conducting events on a
continuous basis.
Superior
Precious Metals was also launched in late 2007 and it is the retail precious
metals arm of DGSE. Professional account managers provide a convenient way for
individuals and companies to buy and sell precious metals and rare coins. This
activity is supported by the internally developed account management and trading
platform created as part of DGSE’s USBullionExchange.com precious metals
system.
2
Products
and Services
Our
jewelry operations include sales to both wholesale and retail customers. We sell
finished jewelry, gem stones, and findings (gold jewelry components) and make
custom jewelry to order. Jewelry inventory is readily available from
wholesalers throughout the United States. In addition, we purchase
inventory from pawn shops and individuals. Jewelry repair is also
available to our customers in our Dallas and Euless, Texas, Woodland Hills,
California and Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina locations.
Our
bullion and rare coin trading operations buy and sell all forms of precious
metals products including United States and other government coins, medallions,
art bars and trade unit bars. Bullion and rare coin transactions are
conducted at all of our store locations.
Bullion
and rare coin products are purchased and sold based on current market
price. The availability of precious metal products is a function of
price as virtually all bullion items are actively traded. Precious
metals sales amounted to 43.2% of total revenues for 2008, 33.6% in 2007 and
36.9% in 2006.
During
December 2000 we opened a jewelry super store located in Mt. Pleasant, South
Carolina. The store operates through a wholly owned subsidiary, Charleston Gold
and Diamond Exchange, Inc. (“CGDE”). CGDE operates in a leased facility located
in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina.
We make
pawn loans through our National Pawn locations. Pawn loans ("loans")
are made on the pledge of tangible personal property, primarily jewelry, for one
month with an automatic sixty-day extension period ("loan
term"). Pawn service charges are recorded on a constant yield basis
over the loan term. If the loan is not repaid, the principal amount
loaned plus accrued pawn service charges become the carrying value of the
forfeited collateral and are transferred to inventory.
Our
primary presence on the internet is through our websites DGSE.com, CGDEinc.com,
SGBH.com, Superiorpreciousmetals.com, Superiorestatebuyers.com,
USBullionexchange.com, Americangoldandsilvereschange.com, and
Fairchildwatches.com. The DGSE.com web site serves as a corporate
information site, a retail store where we sell our products and an auction site
for jewelry and other products. The internet store functions as a CyberCashTm
authorized site which allows customers to purchase products automatically and
securely on line. Auctions close at least five times per week.
.
The
SGBH.com website services as a primary rare coin marketing site and includes a
retail store and conducts regular online auctions.
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com
provides customers from all over the United States with a simple and secure
method to sell unwanted valuables by sending them directly to our corporate
facilities for evaluation. Customers are provided with a firm
purchase price which they can reject or accept for immediate
payment.
Our
internet activity also includes a web site, USBullionExchange.com, which allows
customers unlimited access to current quotations for prices on approximately 200
precious metals, coins and other bullion related products. This web
site allows customers to enter immediate real-time buy and sell orders in dozens
of precious metal products. This functionality allows our customers to fix
prices in real time and to manage their precious metals portfolios in a
comprehensive way.
We also
offer wholesale customers a virtual catalog of our fine watch inventory through
our web site Fairchildwatches.com.
During
the first half of 2009 all of the active websites are being redesigned, expanded
and integrated.
We did
not have any customer or supplier that accounted for more than 10% of total
sales or purchases during 2008, 2007 or 2006.
3
Sales
and Marketing
All of
our activities rely heavily on local television, radio and print media
advertising. Marketing activities emphasize our broad and unusual
array of products and services and the attractiveness of its pricing and
service.
We market
our bullion and rare coin trading services through a combination of advertising
in national coin publications, local print media, coin and bullion wire services
and our internet web site. Trades are primarily with coin and bullion
dealers on a "cash on confirmation" basis which is prevalent in the
industry. Cash on confirmation means that once credit is approved the
buyer remits funds by mail or wire concurrently with the mailing of the precious
metals. Customer orders for bullion or rare coin trades are
customarily delivered within three days of the order or upon clearance of funds
depending on the customer's credit standing. Our backlogs for
fabricated jewelry products were not significant as of December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006.
Seasonality
The
retail and wholesale jewelry business is seasonal. We
realized 22.2%, 37.2% and 27.7% of our annual sales in the
fourth quarters of 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
While our
bullion and rare coin business is not seasonal, management believes it is
directly impacted by the perception of inflation
trends. Historically, anticipation of increases in the rate of
inflation has resulted in higher levels of interest in precious metals as well
as higher prices for such metals. Our other business activities are not
seasonal.
Competition
We
operate in a highly competitive industry where competition is based on a
combination of price, service and product quality. Our jewelry and
consumer loan activities compete with numerous other retail jewelers and
consumer lenders in Dallas and Euless, Texas; Woodland Hills, California; and
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina and the surrounding areas.
The
bullion and rare coin industry in which we compete is dominated by substantially
larger enterprises which wholesale bullion, rare coin and other precious metal
products.
We
attempt to compete in all of our activities by offering high quality products
and services at prices below that of our competitors and by maintaining a staff
of highly qualified employees.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2008, we employed 102 individuals, 96 of whom were full time
employees.
Available
Information
Our
website is located at www.dgse.com.
Through this website, we make available free of charge all of our Securities and
Exchange Commission filings. In addition, a complete copy of our Code
of Ethics is available through this website.
4
Discontinued
Operations and Acquisitions
Discontinued
Operations.
In December 2008 we decided to discontinue the live auction segment
of the Company’s business activities. This decision was based on the substantial
losses being incurred by this operating segment during 2008 and 2007. As a
result, the operating results of the auction segment have been reclassified to
discontinued operations for both 2008 and 2007. During 2008 the auction segment
incurred a pretax loss of $2,379,151.
On July
13, 2007, we sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations
for $77,496 and discontinued operations in those locations. The
receivables sold, including interest due, had a balance of $120,573 at the time
of the sale. The sales price was determined based on the age of the
outstanding receivables. As a result of the sale and discontinued
operations, we recognized a pretax loss of $107,838 on the disposal and a pretax
loss on discontinued operations of $51,938 for the year ended December 31,
2007.
As a
result, operating results from these business segments have been reclassified to
discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of December 31,
2008 there were no operating assets to be disposed of or liabilities to be paid
in completing the disposition of these operations.
Acquisitions.
Superior Galleries,
Inc. On May 30, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Superior
Galleries, Inc., which we refer to as Superior, pursuant to an amended and
restated agreement and plan of merger and reorganization dated as of January 6,
2007, which we refer to as the merger agreement, with Superior and Stanford
International Bank Ltd., then Superior’s largest stockholder and its principal
lender, which we refer to as Stanford, as stockholder agent for the Superior
stockholders, whereby Superior
became a wholly owned subsidiary of DGSE Companies, Inc. Superior operated a store in Beverly Hills, CA. The total purchase price of
approximately $13.6 million was broken down as follows:
Shares
|
Stock Price
|
Extended
Price
|
||||||||||
Common
stock
|
3,669,067 | $ | 2.55 | $ | 9,356,121 | |||||||
A warrants
|
845,634 | 1.27 | (1) | 1,073,955 | ||||||||
B warrants
|
863,000 | 2.55 | 2,220,650 | |||||||||
Exercise Price B
warrants
|
863,000 | $ | .001 | (863 | ) | |||||||
Direct transaction
costs
|
1,176,290 | |||||||||||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 13,806,153 |
(1)
|
The $1.27 is the fair value of the
warrants calculated under the Black Sholes method as of the acquisition
date.
|
The total purchase price has been
allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as
follows:
Goodwill
|
$
|
8,203,448
|
||
Intangible
assets
|
2,521,340
|
|||
Deferred tax
asset
|
1,860,475
|
(1) | ||
Property and other
assets
|
1,068,958
|
|||
Inventory
|
3,260,766
|
|||
Liabilities
assumed
|
(3,108,834
|
)
|
||
Total purchase
price
|
$
|
13,806,153
|
(1)
|
Subsequent to date of acquisition
the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce goodwill and increase
deferred tax assets to reflect the change in estimated fair value of the
net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the Superior
acquisition.
|
In accordance with SFAS 142, the
goodwill will not be amortized but instead tested for impairment in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 142 at least annually and more frequently upon
the occurrence of certain events.
5
During
2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition
of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is
required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is
a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a
number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant
operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on
Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in
a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value.
An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken and it was determined that
it was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, the Company recorded a
non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill
related to Superior.
The
operating results of Superior have been included in the consolidated financial
statements since the acquisition date of May 30, 2007. The following unaudited
condensed consolidated financial information reflects the pro forma results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 as if the acquisition of
Superior had occurred on January 1 of 2007 after giving effect to purchase
accounting adjustments as compared to actual results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the effects of the discontinued operations related
to the live auction segment. The pro forma results have been prepared
for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what operating results would have been had
the acquisition actually taken place at the beginning of the period, and may not
be indicative of future operating results (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December
31,
|
||||||||
(In thousands, except per share
data)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Pro Forma
|
||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 105,219 | $ | 72,067 | ||||
Net earnings
(loss)
|
$ | (7,851 | ) | $ | (2,920 | ) | ||
Net earnings per share —
basic
|
$ | (.81 | ) | $ | (.33 | ) | ||
Net earnings per share —
diluted
|
$ | (.81 | ) | $ | (.33 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares —
basic
|
9,708 | 8,582 | ||||||
Weighted average shares —
diluted
|
9,708 | 10,353 |
In relation to the acquisition, as of
June 29, 2007, Stanford and Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman and chief
executive officer, collectively had the power to vote approximately 63% of our
voting securities, and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our voting
securities on a fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all
options and warrants held by them which are exercisable within sixty days of
December 31, 2007 but not giving effect to the exercise
of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two
stockholders have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of
virtually all corporate matters submitted to the vote of our common stockholders. Those
matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size and
composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations
involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and
Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which
entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate two “independent”
directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief
executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating
officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as each remains an executive
officer.
Through this control of company
nominations to our board of directors and through their voting power, Stanford
and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain
decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of
officers, dividend policy, access to capital (including borrowing from
third-party lenders and the issuance of additional equity securities), a merger
or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition or disposition of
assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of Stanford and
Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in
control of our company, even if the change in control would benefit our other
stockholders. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that
conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
6
Euless Gold &
Silver, Inc.
On May 9, 2007 we purchased all of the
tangible assets of Euless Gold and Silver, Inc., located in Euless, Texas. The purchase price paid for
these assets totaled $1,000,000 including $600,000 in cash and a two year note
in the amount of $400,000. We opened a new retail store in the former
Euless Gold & Silver facility and operate under the name of Dallas Gold
& Silver Exchange. Of the assets received, $990,150 was inventory
and the remainder was fixed assets.
We entered into these transactions
seeing them as opportunistic acquisitions that would allow us to expand our
operations and provide a platform for future growth.
7
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
You
should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment
decision. We believe these are all the material risks currently facing our
business. Our business, financial condition or results of operations
could be materially adversely affected by these risks. The trading
price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may
lose all or part of your investment. You should also refer to the
other information included or incorporated by reference in this report,
including our financial statements and related notes.
Changes in customer demand for our
products and services could result in a significant decrease in
revenues.
Although our customer base commonly uses
our products and services, our failure to meet changing demands of our customers
could result in a significant decrease in our revenues.
Changes in governmental rules and
regulations applicable to the specialty financial services industry could have a
negative impact on our lending activities.
Our lending is subject to extensive
regulation, supervision and licensing requirements under various federal, state
and local laws, ordinances and regulations. New laws and regulations could be
enacted that could have a negative impact on our lending
activities.
Fluctuations in our inventory turnover
and sales.
We regularly experience fluctuations in
our inventory balances, inventory turnover and sales margins, yields on loan
portfolios and pawn redemption rates. Changes in any of these factors could
materially and adversely affect our profitability and ability to achieve our
planned results.
Changes in our liquidity and capital
requirements could limit our ability to achieve our plans.
We require continued access to capital,
and a significant reduction in cash flows from operations or the availability of
credit could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our planned
growth and operating results. Similarly, if actual costs to build new stores
significantly exceeds planned costs, our ability to build new stores or to
operate new stores profitably could be materially restricted. The DGSE credit
agreement also limits the allowable amount of capital expenditures in any given
fiscal year, which could limit our ability to build new
stores.
Changes in competition from various
sources could have a material adverse impact on our ability to achieve our
plans.
We encounter significant competition in
connection with our retail and lending operations from other pawnshops, cash
advance companies and other forms of financial institutions and other retailers,
many of which have significantly greater financial resources than us.
Significant increases in these competitive influences could adversely affect our
operations through a decrease in the number or quality pawn loans or
our ability to liquidate forfeited collateral at acceptable
margins.
In the coins and other collectibles
business, we will compete with a number of comparably sized and smaller firms,
as well as a number of larger firms throughout the United States. Our primary competitors are American
Numismatic Rarities, a comparably-sized coin auctioneer. Many of our competitors
have the ability to attract customers as a result of their reputation and the
quality collectibles they obtain through their industry connections.
Additionally, other reputable companies that sell rare coins and
other collectibles may decide to enter our markets to compete with us. These
companies have greater name recognition and have greater financial and marketing
resources than we do. If these auction companies are successful in entering the
specialized market for premium collectibles in which we participate or if
dealers and sellers participate less in our auctions, we may attract fewer
buyers and our revenue could decrease.
8
Our earnings could be negatively
impacted by an unfavorable outcome of litigation, regulatory actions, or labor
and employment matters.
From time to time, we are involved in
litigation, regulatory actions and labor and employment matters arising from our
normal operations. There can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any
future actions and that they will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
A failure in our information systems
could prevent us from effectively managing and controlling our business or
serving our customers.
We rely on our information systems to
manage and operate our stores and business. Each store is part of an information
network that permits us to maintain adequate cash inventory, reconcile cash
balances daily and report revenues and expenses timely. Any disruption in the
availability of our information systems could adversely affect our operation,
the ability to serve our customers and our results of
operations.
A failure of our internal controls and
disclosure controls and procedures in accordance with the requirements of section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse impact on us and our
investors’ confidence in our reported financial information.
Effective internal controls and
disclosure controls and processes are necessary for us to provide reliable
financial reports and to detect and prevent fraud. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
management assessed the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management has
concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles based on such criteria.
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial
reporting will prevent all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The
design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the
degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent
limitation of a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K
does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If there is a failure in any of our
controls as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that leads to a material misstatement
of our financial condition,
investors could lose confidence in our reported financial
information.
9
Changes in general economic conditions
could negatively affect loan performance and demand for our products and
services.
A sustained deterioration in the
economic environment could adversely affect our operations by reducing consumer
demand for the products we sell.
Interest rate fluctuations could
increase our interest expense.
Although the U.S. Federal Reserve halted
a sustained period of regular interest rate hikes in August 2006, interest
rates could rise which would, in turn, increase our cost of
borrowing.
Our success depends on our ability to
attract, retain and motivate management and other skilled
employees.
Our future success and growth depend on
the continued services of our key management and employees. The loss of the
services of any of these individuals or any other key employee or contractor
could materially affect our business. Our future success also depends on our
ability to identify, attract and retain additional qualified personnel.
Competition for employees in our industry is intense and we may not be
successful in attracting or retaining them. There are a limited number of people
with knowledge of, and experience in, our industry. We do not have employment
agreements with many of our key employees. We do not maintain life insurance
polices on many of our employees. Our loss of key personnel, especially without
advance notice, or our inability to hire or retain qualified personnel, could
have a material adverse effect on sales and our ability to maintain our
technological edge. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to retain our key
management and skilled personnel, or that we will be able to attract, assimilate
and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.
The voting power in our company is
substantially controlled by a small number of stockholders, which may, among
other things, delay or frustrate the removal of incumbent directors or a
takeover attempt, even if such events may be beneficial to our
stockholders.
As of June 29, 2007, Stanford
International Bank Ltd.
(SIBL), which we refer to
as Stanford, and Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer,
collectively had the power to vote approximately 63% of our voting securities,
and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our voting securities on a
fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all options and
warrants held by them which are exercisable within sixty days of December 31, 2007 but not giving effect to the
exercise of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders
may have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of virtually all
corporate matters submitted to the vote of our common stockholders. Those
matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size and
composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations
involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and
Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which
entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate two “independent”
directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief
executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating
officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as he remains an executive
officer.
10
Through this control of company
nominations to our board of directors and through their voting power, Stanford
and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain
decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of
officers, dividend policy, access to capital (including borrowing from
third-party lenders and the issuance of additional equity securities), a merger
or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition or disposition of
assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of Stanford and
Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in
control of our company, even if the change in control would benefit our other
stockholders. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely
affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that
conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
We could be subject to sales taxes,
interest and penalties on interstate sales for which we have not collected
taxes.
Superior has not collected California sales tax on mail-order sales to
out-of-state customers, nor has it collected use tax on its interstate mail
order sales. We believe that our sales to interstate customers are generally
tax-exempt due to varying state exemptions relative to the definitions of being
engaged in business in particular states and the lack of current Internet
taxation. While we have not been contacted by any state authorities seeking to
enforce sales or use tax regulations, we cannot assure you that we will not be
contacted by authorities in the future with inquiries concerning our compliance
with current statutes, nor can we assure you that future statutes will not be
enacted that affect the sales and use tax aspects of our
business.
We may incur losses as a result of
accumulating inventory.
A substantial portion of the products that we sell comes from our own inventory. We purchased these products from dealers and collectors and assume
the inventory and price risks of these items until they are sold. If
we are unable to resell the products that we purchase when we want or need to, or at prices
sufficient to generate a profit from their resale, or if the market value of the
inventory of purchased products were to decline, our revenue would
likely decline.
Our planned expansion and enhancement of
our websites and internet operations may not result
in increased profitability.
The satisfactory performance,
reliability and availability of our website and network infrastructure are and
will be critical to our reputation and our ability to attract and retain
customers and technical personnel and to maintain adequate customer service
levels. Any system interruptions or reduced performance of our website could
materially adversely affect our reputation and our ability to attract new
customers and technical personnel. We are in the process of development and/or
enhancement of several portions of our websites that will offer content and
auctions for rare coins that may have a lower average selling price than many of
the rare coins in the markets we currently serve, and in the future we plan to
integrate various of our websites. Continued development of our websites will
require significant resources and expense. If the planned expansion of our
websites does not result in increased revenue, we may experience decreased
profitability.
11
Our websites may be vulnerable to security breaches
and similar threats which could result in our liability for damages and harm to
our reputation.
Despite the implementation of network
security measures, our websites are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins
and similar disruptive problems caused by internet users. These occurrences
could result in our liability for damages, and our reputation could suffer. The
circumvention of our security measures may result in the misappropriation of
customer or other confidential information. Any such security breach could lead
to interruptions and delays and the cessation of service to our customers and
could result in a decline in revenue and income.
Changes to financial accounting
standards and new exchange rules could make it more expensive to issue stock
options to employees, which would increase compensation costs and may cause us
to change our business practices.
We prepare our financial statements to
conform with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the
United States. These accounting principles are
subject to interpretation by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the
SEC and various other bodies. A change in those policies could have a
significant effect on our reported results and may affect our reporting of
transactions completed before a change is announced.
We are subject to new corporate
governance and internal control reporting requirements, and our costs related to
compliance with, or our failure to comply with existing and future requirements
could adversely affect our business.
We face new corporate governance
requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules and
regulations subsequently adopted by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board and the NYSE Amex. These laws, rules and regulations
continue to evolve and may become increasingly stringent in the future. In
particular, we are
required to include
management’s report on internal controls as part of
our annual report for the year ending December 31, 2007 pursuant to Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We are in the process of evaluating our
control structure to help ensure that we will be able to comply with Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully
comply with these laws, rules and regulations that address corporate governance,
internal control reporting and similar matters. Failure to comply with these
laws, rules and regulations could materially adversely affect our reputation,
financial condition and the value and liquidity of our
securities.
12
The revolving credit facilities with
Stanford International Bank Ltd. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. is each
collateralized by a general security interest in our assets. If we were to
default under the terms of either credit facility, the lender would have the
right to foreclose on our assets.
In December 2005, we entered into a
revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank, N.A.,
which permits borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of
$4.3 million. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are
collateralized by a general security interest in substantially all of our assets
(other than the assets of Superior). As of December 31, 2008, approximately $4.0 million was outstanding under the
term loan and revolving credit facility. If we were to default under the terms
and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Texas Capital Bank would have
the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on our assets
in order to satisfy our indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material
adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial
position.
In October 2003, Superior entered into a revolving credit
facility with Stanford Financial Group Company, which we refer to as SFG, which
has assigned the facility to Stanford. The facility currently permits borrowings
up to a maximum principal amount of $11.5 million, up to $6.5 million of which Superior may upstream to DGSE. Borrowings under
the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security interest
in substantially all of Superior’s assets and, to the extent of money
upstreamed to DGSE, substantially all of DGSE’s assets. As of December 31, 2008, approximately $9.2 million was outstanding under the
revolving credit facility. If Superior were to default under the terms and
conditions of the revolving credit facility, Stanford would have the right to
accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on Superior’s assets, and, subject to intercreditor
arrangements with Texas Capital Bank and other limitations, our assets, in order
to satisfy Superior’s indebtedness. Such a foreclosure
could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of
operations and financial position.
We have
been informed that on February 19, 2009, a US district court placed SIBL under
the supervision of a receiver and that the court enjoined SIBL's creditors and
other persons from taking certain actions related to SIBL or its assets.
In addition, on the same date, Antiguan Financial Services Regulatory Commission
appointed a Receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd. This action was
subsequently ratified by the High Court of Justice in Antigua and
Barbuda. As a result of SIBL's current status, we do not believe that
Superior will be able to borrow additional funds under either revolving
loan, including any amounts Superior is obligated to repay to SIBL pursuant to
the repayment provisions applicable to the first revolving
note. We believe that certain terms of agreements entered into
by us, Superior and/or SIBL and its affiliates in connection with our
acquisition of Superior have been breached by SIBL or its affiliates, and we are
evaluating available remedies, including but not limited to damages from
responsible parties. While Superior does not currently require additional funds
under the SIBL credit facility, should the need arise and Superior is unable to
replace this credit facility the operations and performance of Superior could be
materially adversely affected.
We have not paid dividends on our common
stock in the past and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future.
We have not paid common stock dividends
since our inception and do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable
future. Our current business plan provides for the reinvestment of earnings in
an effort to complete development of our technologies and products, with the
goal of increasing sales and long-term profitability and value. In addition, our
revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank currently restricts, and any
other credit or borrowing arrangements that we may enter into may in the future
restrict or limit, our ability to pay dividends to our
stockholders.
13
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
|
None.
|
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
We own a
20,000 square foot facility at 11311 Reeder Rd, Dallas, Texas which houses
retail and wholesale jewelry, bullion and rare coin trading operations and our
principal executive offices. The land and buildings are subject to a mortgage
maturing in August 2016, with a balance outstanding of approximately $2,332,484
as of December 31, 2008.
Our
Euless, TX location is a 2,158 square foot facility which houses retail jewelry,
bullion and rare coin trading operations. Our monthly lease payments
at December 31, 2008 are $2,608 and the lease is due to expire June 30,
2010.
At
December 31, 2008 we were leasing two facilities in Dallas, Texas which house
our National Pawn operations. The two pawn locations are 7,388 square
feet and 6,800 square feet, respectively. The leases are due to
expire on May 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012 and require monthly lease payments
in the amount of $9,252 and 5,667, respectively.
CGDE
operates in a leased 2,367 square foot facility in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina.
The lease expires in June 2010 and requires monthly lease payments in the amount
of $4,575.
Our
Superior Galleries operations are located in an approximately 9,265 square foot
storefront facility located at 20011 Ventura Boulevard, Woodland Hills,
California. This facility includes administrative, customer support, auction,
gallery and retail space. The lease for this facility expires March
31, 2013. The combined monthly rental rate is $30,045 including
parking fees and rent of storage space.
We also
maintain a resident agent office in Nevada at the office of our Nevada counsel,
McDonald, Carano, Wilson, McClure, Bergin, Frankovitch and Hicks, 241 Ridge
Street, Reno, Nevada 89505.
ITEM 3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
From time
to time, be involved in various claims, lawsuits, disputes with third parties,
actions involving allegations of discrimination, or breach of contract actions
incidental to the operation of its business. Except as set forth
above, we are not currently involved in any such litigation which we believe
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations, liquidity or cash flows.
14
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
On
October 31, 2007, our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE Amex under the
symbol “DGC”. Previously, our Common Stock was traded on the NASDAQ
Small CAP Market under the symbol “DGSE”. The following table sets
forth for the period indicated, the per share high and low bid quotations as
reported by NASDAQ or actual closing sale prices as reported on NYSE Amex for
our common stock. During the past three years, we have not declared
any dividends with respect to our common stock. We intend to retain all earnings
to finance future growth; accordingly, it is not anticipated that cash dividends
will be paid to holders of common stock in the foreseeable future.
The
following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-ups,
mark-downs or commissions and may not reflect actual transactions. High and low
bid quotations for the last two years were:
2008
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$ | 2.600 | $ | 1.000 | ||||
Third
Quarter
|
3.800 | 2.420 | ||||||
Second
Quarter
|
5.040 | 2.920 | ||||||
First
Quarter
|
5.450 | 4.000 | ||||||
2007
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$ | 6.110 | $ | 3.470 | ||||
Third
Quarter
|
4.490 | 3.050 | ||||||
Second
Quarter
|
4.100 | 2.080 | ||||||
First
Quarter
|
3.000 | 2.380 |
On March
27, 2009, the closing sales price for our common stock was $0.85 and there were
558 shareholders of record.
Securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
We have
granted options to certain officers, directors and key employees to purchase
shares of our common stock. Each option vests according to a schedule
designed by our board of directors, not to exceed four years. Each option
expires 180 days from the date of termination of the employee or director. The
exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of our common stock
on the date of grant. These option grants have been approved by security
holders.
The
following table summarizes options outstanding as of December 31,
2008:
Plan Category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of options, warrants &
rights
|
Weighted
average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants & rights
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation
plans
|
|||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
1,444,134
|
$2.34
|
700,000
|
|||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
None
|
--
|
None
|
|||
Total
|
1,443,134
|
$2.34
|
700,000
|
15
Stock Performance
Table
The following table represents a
comparison of the five year total return of our common stock to the NASDAQ
Composite Index, the S&P 600 Small Cap Index and the S&P Retail Index
for the period from January
1, 2003 to December 31,
2008. The comparison assumes $100
was invested on December 31, 2003 and dividends, if any, were reinvested
for all years ending December 31.
Comparison
of Five Year Cumulative Return
|
||||||||
Date:
|
DGSE
Common
Stock
|
NASDAQ
Composite
Index
|
S&P Retail
Index
|
S&P
600 Small
Cap
Index
|
||||
2003
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
||||
2004
|
83
|
111
|
136
|
142
|
||||
2005
|
59
|
113
|
134
|
142
|
||||
2006
|
75
|
124
|
146
|
172
|
||||
2007
|
490
|
197
|
143
|
199
|
||||
2008
|
42
|
78
|
73
|
73
|
On June
27, 2006 stockholders of the Company approved the adoption of the 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan). During the year ended December 31, 2007, there
were 50,000 options granted to our non-employee directors under this plan and,
as a result, there are 700,000 shares available for future grants under the 2006
Plan.
16
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
|
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE
RESULTS
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, includes "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by
the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may," "will," "would,"
"expect," "intend," "could," "estimate," "should," "anticipate" or
"believe." We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject
to the safe harbors created by these laws. All statements other than statements
of historical information provided herein are forward-looking and may contain
information about financial results, economic conditions, trends, and known
uncertainties. All forward-looking statements are based on current expectations
regarding important risk factors. Many of these risks and uncertainties are
beyond our ability to control, and, in many cases, we cannot predict all of the
risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results could
differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, and
readers should not regard those statements as a representation by us or any
other person that the results expressed in the statements will be achieved.
Important risk factors that could cause results or events to differ from current
expectations are described under the section “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in
this report. These factors are not intended to be an all-encompassing list of
risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development
and results of our business. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance
on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of
any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereon, including without limitation,
changes in our business strategy or planned capital expenditures, store growth
plans, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Revenues
increased by $43,749,984 or 71.2%, in 2008. This increase was
primarily the result of a $24,296,000 or 114.9% increase in the sale of precious
metals products, a $17,254,000, or 89.2% increase in retail jewelry sales and a
$1,992,000, or 14.3% increase in rare coin sales. The increases in precious
metals, rare coin and jewelry sales were due to a price increase in gold
products and the acquisition of Superior Galleries and Euless Gold and Silver.
Consumer loan service fees increased by $242,440 in 2008 due to increased loans
outstanding during the year. Cost of goods as a percentage of sales
increased to 86.7% in 2008 from 84.1% in 2007 and gross margins decreased to
13.3% in 2008 from 15.9% in 2007. This decrease was due to the
significant increase in precious metal sales which have a much lower margin than
jewelry and rare coins revenues.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $1,520,262 or 18.3% during the
year. This increase was due to the start up of Superior Precious metals,
Superior Estate Buyers, American Gold and Silver Exchange and the opening of our
second pawn shop during 2007. Depreciation and amortization increased
by $236,975, or 95.6%, during 2008 due to additional assets being purchased
through our recent acquisitions and depreciation on our new facility in Dallas,
Texas. The increase in interest expense was due to the additional debt related
to the Superior acquisition. The loss from discontinued operations was the
result of the discontinuing the operations of our live auction segment and
closing of our pay day loan stores.
During
2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition
of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is
required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is
a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a
number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant
operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on
Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in
a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value.
An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken, which considered two
methodologies to determine the fair-value of the entity:
|
·
|
A
market capitalization approach, which measure market capitalization at the
measurement date.
|
|
·
|
A
discounted cash flow approach, which entails determining fair value using
a discounted cash flow methodology. This method requires
significant judgment to estimate the future cash flow and to determine the
appropriate discount rates, growth rates, and other
assumptions.
|
Each of
these methodoligies the Company believes has merit, and resulted in the
determination that goodwill was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the
impairment, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which
eliminated the value of the goodwill related to Superior.
Comparison
of the Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
increased by $17,612,328, or 40.1%, in 2007. This increase was
primarily the result of a $4,901,000, or 30.1% increase in the sale of precious
metals products, a $2,819,000, or 17.1% increase in retail jewelry sales, and a
$9,224,000, or 196.4% increase in rare coin sales. The increases in precious
metals, rare coin and jewelry sales were due to a 31.0% price increase in gold
products and the acquisition of Superior Galleries and Euless Gold and
Silver. Consumer loan service fees increased by $118,641 in 2007 due
to increased loans outstanding during the year. Management fees in the amount of
$250,000 were derived from a management agreement between the Company and
Superior Galleries prior to the acquisition. Cost of goods as a percentage of
sales increased to 84.9% in 2007 from 84.3% in 2006 and gross margins decreased
to 15.1% in 2007 from 15.7% in 2006. This decrease was due to the
significant increase in precious metal sales which have a much lower margin than
jewelry and rare coins revenues.
17
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased by $2,814,975, or 50.9%. This
increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Superior Galleries and Euless
Gold and Silver. These acquisitions accounted for $1,807,000 of the increase. In
addition, administrative cost related to the start up of Superior Precious
metals, Superior Estate Buyers, American Gold and Silver Exchange and the
opening of our second pawn shop totaled $408,000. Depreciation and amortization
increased by $110,543, or 99.4%, during 2007 due to additional assets being
purchased through our recent acquisitions. The increase in interest expense was
due to the additional debt related to the Superior acquisition. The loss from
discontinued operations was the result of the closing of our pay day loan
stores.
Historically,
changes in the market prices of precious metals have had a significant impact on
both revenues and cost of sales in the rare coin and precious metals segments in
which we operate. It is expected that due to the commodity nature of
these products, future price changes for precious metals will continue to be
indicative of our performance in these business segments. Changes in sales and
cost of sales in the retail and wholesale jewelry segments are primarily
influenced by the national economic environment. It is expected that this trend
will continue in the future due to the nature of these products.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We expect
capital expenditures to total approximately $250,000 during the next twelve
months. It is anticipated that these expenditures will be funded from
working capital and our bank credit facility. As of December 31, 2008
there were no commitments outstanding for capital expenditures.
In the
event of significant growth in retail and or wholesale jewelry sales, the demand
for additional working capital will expand due to a related need to stock
additional jewelry inventory and increases in wholesale accounts
receivable. Historically, vendors have offered us extended payment
terms to finance the need for jewelry inventory growth and our management
believes that we will continue to do so in the future. Any
significant increase in wholesale accounts receivable will be financed under our
bank credit facility.
Our
ability to finance our operations and working capital needs are dependent upon
management’s ability to negotiate extended terms or refinance its
debt. We have historically renewed, extended or replaced short-term
debt as it matures and management believes that we will be able to continue to
do so in the near future.
From time
to time, we have adjusted our inventory levels to meet seasonal demand or in
order to meet working capital requirements. Management is of the opinion that if
additional working capital is required, additional loans can be obtained from
individuals or from commercial banks. If necessary, inventory levels
may be adjusted or a portion of our investments in marketable securities may be
liquidated in order to meet unforeseen working capital
requirements.
In December 2005, we entered into a
revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank, N.A., which currently permits
borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of $4.03 million. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security
interest in substantially all of our assets (other than the assets of
Superior). As of December 31, 2008,
approximately $4.0 million was outstanding under the term loan and
revolving credit facility. If we were to default under the terms and conditions
of the revolving credit facility, Texas Capital Bank would have the right to
accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on our assets in order to
satisfy our indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material adverse
effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial position.
This credit facility matures in June 2009.
Upon the
consummation of our acquisition of Superior, and after the exchange by Stanford
of $8.4 million of Superior debt for shares of Superior common stock, Superior
amended and restated its credit facility with Stanford. The amended and restated
commercial loan and security agreement, which we refer to as the loan agreement,
decreased the available credit line from $19.89 million to $11.5 million,
reflecting the $8.4 million debt exchange. Interest on the outstanding principal
balance will continue to accrue at the prime rate, as reported in the Wall
Street Journal or, during an event of default, at a rate 5% greater than the
prime rate as so reported.
18
Loan
proceeds can only be used for customer loans inventory purchases and receivables
consistent with specified loan policies and procedures and for permitted
inter-company transactions. Permitted inter-company transactions are loans or
dividends paid to us or our other subsidiaries. We guaranteed the repayment of
these permitted inter-company transactions pursuant to a secured subordinated
guaranty in favor of Stanford. In connection with the secured
guarantee, Stanford and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., our primary lender, entered
into an intercreditor agreement with us, and we entered into a subordination
agreement with Superior, both of which subordinate Stanford's security interests
and repayment rights to those of Texas Capital Bank. As of December 31, 2008, approximately $9.2 million was
outstanding under this credit facility and there were no intercompany
transactions outstanding.
This
credit facility matures on May 1, 2011, provided that in case any of several
customary events of default occurs, Stanford may declare the entire principal
amount of both loans due immediately and take possession and dispose of the
collateral described below. An event of default includes, among others, the
following events: failure to make a payment when due under the loan agreement;
breach of a covenant in the loan agreement or any related agreement; a
representation or warranty made in the loan agreement or related agreements is
materially incorrect; a default in repayment of borrowed money to any person; a
material breach or default under any material contract; certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events; and a default under a third-party loan. Superior
is obligated to repay the first revolving loan from the proceeds of the
inventory or other collateral purchased with the proceeds of the
loan.
The loans
are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of
Superior’s assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, promissory notes,
books and records and insurance policies, and the proceeds of the
foregoing. In addition, pursuant to the limited secured guaranty and
intercreditor arrangements described above, Stanford would have a second-order
security interest in all of our accounts and inventory to the extent of
intercompany transactions.
The loan
agreement includes a number of customary covenants applicable to Superior,
including, among others: punctual payments of principal and interest under the
credit facility; prompt payment of taxes, leases and other indebtedness;
maintenance of corporate existence, qualifications, licenses, intellectual
property rights, property and assets; maintenance of satisfactory insurance;
preparation and delivery of financial statements for us and separately for
Superior in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, tax
returns and other financial information; inspection of offices and collateral;
notice of certain events and changes; use of proceeds; notice of governmental
orders which may have a material adverse effect, SEC filings and stockholder
communications; maintenance of property and collateral; and payment of Stanford
expenses.
In
addition, Superior has agreed to a number of negative covenants in the loan
agreement, including, among others, covenants not to: create or suffer a lien or
other encumbrance on any collateral, subject to customary exceptions; incur,
guarantee or otherwise become liable for any indebtedness, subject to customary
exceptions; acquire indebtedness of another person, subject to customary
exceptions and permitted inter-company transactions; issue or acquire any shares
of its capital stock; pay dividends other than permitted inter-company
transactions or specified quarterly dividends, or directors’ fees; sell or
abandon any collateral except in the ordinary course of business or consolidate
or merge with another entity; enter into affiliate transactions other than in
the ordinary course of business on fair terms or permitted inter-company
transactions; create or participate in any partnership or joint venture; engage
in a new line of business; pay principal or interest on subordinate debt except
as authorized by the credit facility; or make capital expenditures in excess of
$100,000 per fiscal year
We have been informed that on February 19, 2009, a US district
court placed SIBL under
the supervision of a receiver and that the court enjoined SIBL's creditors and
other persons from taking certain actions related to SIBL or its
assets. In addition,
on the same date, Antiguan Financial Services Regulatory Commission appointed a
Receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd. This action was subsequently
ratified by the High Court of Justice in Antigua and Barbuda. As a
result of SIBL's current status, we do not believe that Superior will be able
to borrow additional
funds under either revolving loan, including any amounts Superior is obligated
to repay to SIBL pursuant to the repayment provisions applicable to the first
revolving note. We believe that certain terms of
agreements entered into by us, Superior and/or
SIBL and its affiliates in connection with our acquisition of Superior
have been breached by SIBL or its
affiliates, and we are
evaluating available remedies, including but not limited to damages from
responsible parties. While Superior does not currently require additional funds
under the SIBL credit facility, should the need arise and Superior is unable to
replace this credit facility the operations and performance of Superior could be
materially adversely affected.
19
On
October 17, 2007, we closed on the purchase of our new headquarters
location. As a result, we assumed a new loan with a remaining
principal balance of $2,323,484 and an interest rate of 6.70%. The
loan has required monthly payments of $20,192 with the final payment due on
August 1, 2016.
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Cash
Obligations
|
Total
|
2009
|
2010 - 2011
|
2012 – 2013
|
Thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ | 191,078 | $ | 191,078 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | ||||||||||
Long-term
debt and capital leases
|
|
15,910,737 | 4,195,025 | 9,403,271 | 469,381 | 1,843,060 | ||||||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
|
2,643,812 | 658,822 | 1,237,026 | 747,964 | -- | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 18,745,627 | $ | 5,044,925 | $ | 10,640,297 | $ | 1,217,345 | $ | 1,843,060 |
In
addition, we estimate that we will pay approximately $950,000 in interest during
the next twelve months.
ITEM
7A.
|
QUALITATIVE
AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
|
Market
Risk
The
following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in
interest rates and precious metal values. We also are exposed to
regulatory risk in relation to our pawn loans. We do not use
derivative financial instruments.
Our
earnings and financial position may be affected by changes in precious metal
values and the resulting impact on pawn lending and jewelry sales. The proceeds
of scrap sales and our ability to liquidate excess jewelry inventory at an
acceptable margin are dependent upon gold values. The impact on our
financial position and results of operations of a hypothetical change in
precious metal values cannot be reasonably estimated.
20
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements (see pages 29 - 50 of this
report).
|
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
|
None.
ITEM
9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
|
Disclosure
Controls and procedures
An
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (1) recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
Under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
management assessed the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management has
concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance generally accepted
accounting principles based on such criteria.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K
does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial
reporting will prevent all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The
design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the
degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent
limitation of a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
21
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, there have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART
III
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES. (*)
(*)
|
The information required by Item
14 is or will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement relating to
the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of DGSE Companies, Inc., which is
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
This definitive proxy statement relates to a meeting of stockholders
involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to
be set forth in this Form 10-K by Item 14 are incorporated herein by
reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to
Form 10-K.
|
22
PART
IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit
|
Filed
|
Incorporated
|
Date Filed
|
Exhibit
|
||||||||||
No.
|
Description
|
Herein
|
by
Reference
|
Form
|
with SEC
|
No.
|
||||||||
2.1
|
Amended and Restated Agreement and
Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of January 6,
2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
2.1
|
|||||||||
2.2
|
Limited Joinder Agreement, dated
as of January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
2.9
|
|||||||||
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation dated
September 17, 1965
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.1
|
|||||||||
3.2
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation, dated October 14,
1981
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.2
|
|||||||||
3.3
|
Certificate of Resolution, dated
October 14, 1981
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.3
|
|||||||||
3.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation , dated July 15,
1986
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.4
|
|||||||||
3.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation, dated August 23,
1998
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.5
|
|||||||||
3.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26, 1992
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.6
|
|||||||||
3.7
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26, 2001
|
×
|
8-K
|
July 3,
2001
|
1.0
|
|||||||||
3.8
|
Certificate of Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation, dated May 22, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31,
2007
|
3.1
|
|||||||||
3.9
|
By-laws, dated March 2,
1992
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.7
|
|||||||||
4.1
|
Specimen Common Stock
Certificate
|
×
|
S-4
|
January 6,
2007
|
4.1
|
23
10.1
|
Renewal, Extension And
Modification Agreement dated January 28, 1994, by and among DGSE
Corporation and Michael E. Hall And Marian E. Hall
|
×
|
10-KSB
|
March 1995
|
10.2
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
10.2
|
Lease Agreement dated June 2,
2000 by and between SND Properties and Charleston Gold and Diamond
Exchange, Inc.
|
×
|
10-KSB
|
March 29,
2001
|
10.1
|
|||||||||
10.3
|
Lease agreement dated October 5,
2004 by and between Beltline Denton Road Associates and Dallas Gold &
Silver Exchange
|
×
|
10-K
|
April 15,
2005
|
10.2
|
|||||||||
10.4
|
Lease agreement dated December 1,
2004 by and between Stone Lewis Properties and Dallas Gold & Silver
Exchange
|
×
|
10-K
|
April 15,
2005
|
10.3
|
|||||||||
10.5
|
Lease agreement dated November 18,
2004 by and between Hinkle Income Properties LLC and American Pay Day
Centers, Inc.
|
×
|
10-K
|
April 15,
2005
|
10.4
|
|||||||||
10.6
|
Lease Agreement dated January 17,
2005 by and between Belle-Hall Development Phase III Limited Partnership
and DGSE Companies, Inc.
|
×
|
S-4
|
January 6,
2007
|
10.6
|
|||||||||
10.7
|
Sale
agreement dated executed July 5, 2007 by and between DGSE Companies,
Inc. and Texas Department of Transportation
|
×
|
8-K
|
July 11,
2007
|
10.1
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
10.8
|
Purchase
agreement dated July 5, 2007 by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and
11311 Reeder Road Holdings, LP
|
×
|
8-K
|
July 11,
2007
|
10.2
|
|||||||||
10.9
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of
December 22, 2005, between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas Capital
Bank, N.A.
|
×
|
8-K/A
|
August 17,
2006
|
10.1
|
24
10.10
|
Third Amendment to Loan Agreement,
dated as of May 10, 2007, by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas
Capital Bank, N.A.
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 9, 2007
|
3.0
|
|||||||||
10.11
|
Support Agreement, DGSE
stockholders, dated as of January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.1
|
|||||||||
10.12
|
Securities Exchange Agreement,
dated as of January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.2
|
|||||||||
10.13
|
Warrant to DiGenova, issued
January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.3
|
|||||||||
10.14
|
Support Agreement, Superior
stockholders, dated as of January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.5
|
|||||||||
10.15
|
Asset purchase agreement, dated
May 9, 2007, by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Euless
Gold & Silver, Inc.
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 9, 2007
|
1.0
|
|||||||||
10.16
|
Subordinated Promissory Note dated
May 9, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 9, 2007
|
2.0
|
|||||||||
10.17
|
Registration Rights Agreement with
Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30,
2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.1
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
10.18
|
Corporate Governance Agreement
with Dr. L.S. Smith and Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May
30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.2
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
10.19
|
Escrow Agreement with American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Stanford International Bank Ltd.,
as stockholder agent, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.3
|
|||||||||
10.20
|
Form of
Warrants
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.4
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
10.21
|
Amended and Restated Commercial
Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Superior Galleries Inc. and
Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30,
2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.5
|
25
10.22
|
Employment Agreement with L.S.
Smith, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.6
|
|||||||||
10.23
|
Employment Agreement with William
H. Oyster, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.7
|
|||||||||
10.24
|
Employment Agreement with John
Benson, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May 31, 2007
|
99.8
|
|||||||||
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S.
Smith
|
×
|
||||||||||||
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John
Benson
|
×
|
||||||||||||
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S. Smith
|
×
|
||||||||||||
32.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John Benson
|
×
|
(b)
|
Reports
on Form 8-K :
|
None.
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
DGSE
Companies, Inc.
By:
|
/s/ L. S. Smith
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
L.
S. Smith
|
|||
Chairman
of the Board,
|
|||
Chief
Executive Officer and
|
|||
Secretary
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
By:
|
/s/ L. S. Smith
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
L.S
Smith
|
|||
Chairman
of the Board,
|
|||
Chief
Executive Officer and
|
|||
Secretary
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ W. H. Oyster
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
W.
H. Oyster
|
|||
Director,
President and
|
|||
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ John Benson
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
John
Benson
|
|||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|||
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ William P. Cordeiro
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
Director
|
|||
By:
|
/s/ Craig Allan-Lee
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
Director
|
|||
By:
|
/s/Mitch Stoltz
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
Director
|
|||
By:
|
/s/David Rector
|
Dated:
March 31, 2009
|
|
Director
|
27
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and
Shareholders
of DGSE Companies, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DSGE Companies, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We have
not been engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of operations and its
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/
Cornwell Jackson
Plano,
Texas
March 31,
2009
28
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
December
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 244,429 | $ | 536,548 | ||||
Trade
receivables
|
2,326,337 | 3,249,229 | ||||||
Inventories
|
16,052,833 | 12,975,782 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
533,318 | 459,486 | ||||||
Prepaid
federal income tax
|
639,372 | 59,341 | ||||||
Current
assets of discontinued operations
|
900,306 | 1,290,245 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
20,696,595 | 18,570,631 | ||||||
Marketable
securities – available for sale
|
- | 61,769 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
4,868,306 | 4,193,869 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,908,032 | 1,805,205 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
837,117 | 8,952,181 | ||||||
Intangible
assets
|
2,492,673 | 2,521,340 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
235,917 | 309,836 | ||||||
Non-current
assets of discontinued operations
|
305,275 | 444,383 | ||||||
$ | 31,343,915 | $ | 36,859,214 | |||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ | 191,078 | $ | 187,467 | ||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
599,972 | 501,631 | ||||||
Line
of credit
|
3,595,000 | - | ||||||
Accounts
payable – trade
|
734,906 | 1,069,194 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
647,536 | 1,018,003 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
1,230,991 | 315,437 | ||||||
Current
liabilities of discontinued operations
|
33,144 | - | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
7,032,627 | 3,091,732 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
11,715,765 | 13,489,901 | ||||||
18,748,392 | 16,581,633 | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,833,635 and
4,490,357 shares issued and outstanding at the end of each period in 2008
and 2007
|
98,337 | 94,904 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
18,541,662 | 18,473,234 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
- | (97,288 | ) | |||||
Retained
earnings (deficit)
|
(6,044,476 | ) | 1,806,731 | |||||
12,595,523 | 20,277,581 | |||||||
$ | 31,343,915 | $ | 36,859,214 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
29
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ | 104,670,207 | $ | 60,912,663 | $ | 43,668,973 | ||||||
Consumer
loan service charges
|
548,853 | 306,413 | 187,772 | |||||||||
Management
fees
|
- | 250,000 | — | |||||||||
105,219,060 | 61,469,076 | 43,856,745 | ||||||||||
Costs
and expenses
|
||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
91,237,578 | 51,711,643 | 36,809,910 | |||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
9,841,806 | 8,321,544 | 5,529,314 | |||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
484,832 | 247,857 | 111,259 | |||||||||
101,564,216 | 60,281,044 | 42,450,483 | ||||||||||
Operating
income
|
3,654,844 | 1,188,032 | 1,406,262 | |||||||||
Other
(income) expense
|
||||||||||||
Impairment
of goodwill
|
8,185,444 | — | — | |||||||||
Other
income
|
87,693 | (552,665 | ) | (16,534 | ) | |||||||
Interest
expense
|
902,897 | 675,199 | 408,269 | |||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
(5,521,190 | ) | 1,065,498 | 1,014,527 | ||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
759,777 | 250,056 | 348,188 | |||||||||
Net
earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
(6,280,967 | ) | 815,442 | 666,339 | ||||||||
Discontinued
operations:
|
||||||||||||
Loss
(Gain) from discontinued operations (less applicable income tax benefit
(expense) of $808,911, ($18,556) and $28,381,
respectively)
|
1,570,240 | (21,207 | ) | 55,094 | ||||||||
Loss
on disposal of discontinued operations (less applicable income tax benefit
of $0, $26,208 and $0, respectively)
|
— | 81,630 | — | |||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | (7,851,207 | ) | $ | 755,019 | $ | 611,245 | |||||
Earnings
per common share
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
||||||||||||
From
continuing operations
|
$ | (.65 | ) | $ | .11 | $ | .14 | |||||
From
discontinued operations
|
(.16 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.02 | ) | ||||||
Net
earnings per common share
|
$ | (.81 | ) | $ | .10 | $ | .12 | |||||
Diluted
|
||||||||||||
From
continuing operations
|
$ | (.65 | ) | $ | .10 | $ | .13 | |||||
From
discontinued operations
|
(.16 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.01 | ) | ||||||
Net
earnings per common share
|
$ | (.81 | ) | $ | .09 | $ | .12 | |||||
Weighted
average number of common shares:
|
||||||||||||
Basic
|
9,708,045 | 7,507,579 | 4,913,290 | |||||||||
Diluted
|
9,708,045 | 8,281,887 | 5,006,909 |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements
30
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
|
Other
Comprehensive
|
Total
Stockholder’s
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit)
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2006
|
4,913,290 | $ | 49,133 | $ | 5,708,760 | $ | 440,467 | $ | (127,252 | ) | $ | 6,071,108 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
611,245 | 611,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on marketable securities, net of tax
|
(4,993 | ) | (4,993 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
4,913,290 | $ | 49,133 | $ | 5,708,760 | $ | 1,051,712 | $ | (132,245 | ) | $ | 6,677,360 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
755,019 | 755,019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on marketable securities, net of tax
|
34,957 | 34,957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition
of Superior
|
3,669,067 | 36,691 | 12,593,172 | 12,629,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion
of warrants
|
908,000 | 9,080 | 142,485 | 151,565 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
28,817 | 28,817 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
9,490,357 | $ | 94,904 | $ | 18,473,234 | $ | 1,806,731 | $ | (97,288 | ) | $ | 20,277,581 | ||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,851,207 | ) | $ | (7,851,207 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment
of marketable securities, net of tax
|
97,288 | 97,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option
expense
|
36,092 | 36,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued in Heritage settlement
|
8,372 | 83 | 49,916 | 49,999 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
warrants exercised
|
334,906 | 3,350 | (17,580 | ) | (14,230 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
9,833,635 | $ | 98,337 | $ | 18,541,662 | $ | (6,044,476 | ) | $ | — | $ | 12,595,523 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
31
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | (7,851,207 | ) | $ | 755,019 | $ | 611,245 | |||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
484,832 | 253,887 | 139,395 | |||||||||
Impairment
of Goodwill
|
8,185,443 | — | — | |||||||||
Deferred
taxes
|
(102,827 | ) | (31,692 | ) | (3,801 | ) | ||||||
(Gain)/Loss
on sale of marketable securities
|
115,991 | (3,890 | ) | — | ||||||||
Stock
option expense
|
36,092 | — | — | |||||||||
Loss
on discontinued operations
|
— | 120,495 | — | |||||||||
Gain
on sale of building
|
— | (579,447 | ) | — | ||||||||
(Increase)
decrease in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||||||
Trade
receivables
|
1,473,136 | (3,345,559 | ) | (317,694 | ) | |||||||
Inventories
|
(3,077,051 | ) | (928,838 | ) | (225,908 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(73,832 | ) | (70,810 | ) | 23,181 | |||||||
Change
in other long term assets
|
73,919 | 181,855 | (11,826 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(668,000 | ) | (695,689 | ) | 179,081 | |||||||
Change
in customer deposits
|
915,554 | 24,712 | (34,408 | ) | ||||||||
Federal
income taxes payable
|
(580,031 | ) | 38,131 | (111,392 | ) | |||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(1,067,981 | ) | (4,281,376 | ) | 247,793 | |||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||||||
Pawn
loans
made
|
(1,294,876 | ) | (714,209 | ) | (485,595 | ) | ||||||
Pawn
loans
repaid
|
649,122 | 380,060 | 417,124 | |||||||||
Recovery
of pawn loan principal through sale of forfeited
collateral
|
624,557 | 204,121 | 100,960 | |||||||||
Pay
day loans made
|
— | (164,289 | ) | (274,973 | ) | |||||||
Pay
day loans repaid
|
— | 125,982 | 195,534 | |||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(1,130,602 | ) | (3,780,554 | ) | (42,058 | ) | ||||||
Deal
cost for Superior Galleries acquisition
|
(70,379 | ) | (375,280 | ) | (569,782 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition
of Euless Gold & Silver
|
— | (600,000 | ) | — | ||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of discontinued operations
|
— | 77,496 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of building
|
— | 924,742 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable securities
|
— | 396 | — | |||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,222,178 | ) | (3,921,535 | ) | (658,790 | ) | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from debt
|
2,500,000 | 6,991,578 | 1,247,350 | |||||||||
Mortgage
on new corporate office and store location
|
— | 2,441,922 | — | |||||||||
Issuance
of common
stock
|
78,835 | 78,363 | — | |||||||||
Repayments
of notes payable
|
(580,795 | ) | (1,982,686 | ) | (668,905 | ) | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
1,989,040 | 7,529,177 | 578,445 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
(292,119 | ) | (673,734 | ) | 167,448 | |||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
536,548 | 1,210,282 | 1,042,834 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 244,429 | $ | 536,548 | $ | 1,210,282 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
32
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows (Continued)
Supplemental
disclosures:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 904,242 | $ | 572,592 | $ | 378,562 | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 600,000 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 435,000 | ||||||
Non-Cash Financing
Heritage
Settlement
|
$ | 50,000 | $ | — | $ | — |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
33
DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
1 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations
A summary
of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:
Principles
of Consolidation and Nature of Operations
DGSE
Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), sell jewelry and bullion
products to both retail and wholesale customers throughout the United States
through its facilities in Dallas and Euless, Texas, Mt. Pleasant, South
Carolina, Woodland Hills California and through its internet sites.
The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All
material intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
On July
13, 2007, the Company sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center
locations and discontinued operations in those locations. In November
2008, the Company decided to discontinue the live auction segment of its
business activities. This decision was based on the substantial losses being
incurred by this operating segment during 2008. As a result, the
operating results of the auction segment have been reclassified to discontinued
operations for both 2008 and 2007. During 2008 the auction segment incurred a
pretax loss of $2,379,151. As a result of these dispositions, the Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes have been reclassed to present the
results of the American Pay Day Center locations and auction segment activities
as discontinued operations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly
liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
Investments
in Marketable Equity Securities
Marketable
equity securities have been categorized as available-for-sale and carried at
fair value. Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale
securities are included as a component of shareholders’ equity net of tax until
realized. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are
based on the specific identification method. The Company continually
reviews its investments to determine whether a decline in fair value below the
cost basis is other than temporary. If the decline in the fair values
is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the security is written
down to fair value and the amount of the write-down is included in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Inventory
Jewelry
and other inventory is valued at lower-of-cost-or-market (specific
identification). Bullion inventory is valued at
lower-of-cost-or-market (average cost).
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are being provided on the
straight-line method over periods of three to thirty years. Machinery
and equipment under capital leases are amortized on the straight-line method
over the life of the lease. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance
are charged to expense as incurred.
Goodwill
Effective
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Under that pronouncement, goodwill is not
being amortized but is subject to periodic tests to determine the amount of
impairment, if any, to be reflected during the period.
34
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
1 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations - continued
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The
Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets (including
intangible assets) based on their current and anticipated future undiscounted
cash flows. An impairment occurs when the discounted cash flows
(excluding interest) do not exceed the carrying amount of the
asset. The amount of the impairment loss is the difference between
the carrying amount of the asset and its estimated fair value.
Financial
Instruments
The
carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities, short-term debt,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the
immediate or short-term maturity of these consolidated financial
instruments. The carrying amount reported for long-term debt
approximates fair value because substantially all of the underlying instruments
have variable interest rates which reprice frequently or the interest rates
approximate current market rates.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising
costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $2,584,657, $1,442,723 and
$823,106 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company records trade receivables when revenue is recognized. No
product has been consigned to customers. The Company’s allowance for
doubtful accounts is primarily determined by review of specific trade
receivables. Those accounts that are doubtful of collection are
included in the allowance. These provisions are reviewed to determine
the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Trade
receivables are
charged off when there is certainty as to their being
uncollectible. Trade receivables are considered delinquent when
payment has not been made within contract terms. As of December 31,
2008, the Company had a recorded allowance amount of $97,922. The
balance of the Company’s trade receivables is net of the allowance
amount.
Pawn
loans receivable in the amount of $306,620 and $263,856 as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets caption
trade receivables. The related pawn service charges receivable in the amount of
$89,235 and $63,532 as of December 31 2008 and 2007, respectively, are also
included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets caption trade
receivables.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial
statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the
consolidated financial statements and tax basis of assets and
liabilities.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is generated from wholesale and retail sales of rare coins, precious metals,
bullion and second-hand jewelry. The recognition of revenue varies for wholesale
and retail transactions and is, in large part, dependent on the type of payment
arrangements made between the parties. The Company recognizes sales on an F.O.B.
shipping point basis.
The
Company sells rare coins to other wholesalers/dealers within its industry on
credit, generally for terms of 14 to 60 days, but in no event greater than one
year. The Company grants credit to new dealers based on extensive
credit evaluations and for existing dealers based on established business
relationships and payment histories. The Company generally does not obtain
collateral with which to secure its accounts receivable when the sale is made to
a dealer. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses
based on an evaluation of specific receivables and its historical experience
related to credit losses.
Revenues
for monetary transactions (i.e., cash and receivables) with dealers are
recognized when the merchandise is shipped to the related
dealer.
35
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The
Company also sells rare coins to retail customers on credit, generally for terms
of 30 to 60 days, but in no event greater than one year. The Company
grants credit to new retail customers based on extensive credit evaluations and
for existing retail customers based on established business relationships and
payment histories. When a retail customer is granted credit, the Company
generally collects a payment of 25% of the sales price, establishes a payment
schedule for the remaining balance and holds the merchandise as collateral as
security against the customer’s receivable until all amounts due under the
credit arrangement are paid in full. If the customer defaults in the
payment of any amount when due, the Company may declare the customer’s
obligation in default, liquidate the collateral in a commercially reasonable
manner using such proceeds to extinguish the remaining balance and disburse any
amount in excess of the remaining balance to the customer.
Under
this retail arrangement, revenues are recognized when the customer agrees to the
terms of the credit and makes the initial payment. We have a
limited-in-duration money back guaranty policy (as discussed
below).
In
limited circumstances, the Company exchanges merchandise for similar merchandise
and/or monetary consideration with both dealers and retail customers, for which
the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SFAS 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” When the Company exchanges merchandise
for similar merchandise and there is no monetary component to the exchange, the
Company does not recognize any revenue. Instead, the basis of the merchandise
relinquished becomes the basis of the merchandise received, less any indicated
impairment of value of the merchandise relinquished. When the Company exchanges
merchandise for similar merchandise and there is a monetary component to the
exchange, the Company recognizes revenue to the extent of monetary assets
received and determine the cost of sale based on the ratio of monetary assets
received to monetary and non-monetary assets received multiplied by the cost of
the assets surrendered.
The
Company has a return policy (money-back guarantee). The policy covers
retail transactions involving graded rare coins only. Customers may return
graded rare coins purchased within 7 days of the receipt of the rare coins for a
full refund as long as the rare coins are returned in exactly the same condition
as they were delivered. In the case of rare coin sales on account, customers may
cancel the sale within 7 days of making a commitment to purchase the rare coins.
The receipt of a deposit and a signed purchase order evidences the commitment.
Any customer may return a coin if they can demonstrate that the coin is not
authentic, or there was an error in the description of a graded
coin.
Revenues
from the sale of consigned goods are recognized as commission income on such
sale if the Company is acting as an agent for the consignor. If in the process
of selling consigned goods, the Company makes an irrevocable payment to a
consignor for the full amount due on the consignment and the corresponding
receivable from the buyer(s) has not been collected by the Company at that
payment date, the Company records that payment as a purchase and the sale of the
consigned good(s) to the buyer as revenue as the Company has assumed all
collection risk.
Pawn
loans (“loans”) are made with the collateral of tangible personal property for
one month with an automatic 60-day extension period. Pawn service
charges are recorded at the time of redemption at the greater of $15 or the
actual interest accrued to date. If the loan is not repaid, the
principal amount loaned plus accrued interest (or the fair value of the
collateral, if lower) becomes the carrying value of the forfeited collateral
(“inventories”) which is recovered through sales to customers.
Direct
cost of Pawn Loan Service Charge Revenue
The
direct cost of pawn loan service charge revenue is included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations caption “Selling, general and administrative
expenses”.
Fair Value
Measures
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measures” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value
measures required under other accounting pronouncements, but does not change
existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157.
SFAS No.
157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an
entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be
determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant
assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity
(observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy)
and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions
(unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1
inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs
other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs
that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such
as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable
at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as
there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the
determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different
levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within
which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to
the asset or liability. The adoption did not have any financial impact on the
Company’s results of operations and financial position.
36
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
1 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations - continued
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping
and handling costs are included in selling general and administrative expenses,
and amounted to $305,988, $266,867 and $178,999 for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
Basic
earnings per common share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is based upon
the weighted average number of common stock outstanding and, when dilutive,
common shares issuable for stock options.
Comprehensive
Income
The
Company reports all changes in comprehensive income in the consolidated
statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, in accordance with the provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income.
Stock-based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees using the intrinsic
value method. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options to
employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the
Company’s common stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock.
The fair
value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for grants after 1998, expected volatility of 70% to 96%,
risk-free rate of 3.9 to 6.6%, no dividend yield and expected life of 5 to 8
years.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications were made to the prior years’ consolidated financial
statements to conform to the current year presentation.
37
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). Among other changes, SFAS 141R requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction at fair value; and
establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including earn-out provisions. SFAS
141R is effective for business combinations occurring in the first annual
reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is
evaluating the anticipated effect of this recently issued standard on our
consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash
flows.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”), which amends the factors
that should be considered when developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of an intangible asset under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”, in order to improve consistency between SFAS No. 142 and the period of
expected cash flows to measure the fair value of the asset under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”
and other U.S. generally accepted accounting practices. This FASB Staff Position
is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of FSP No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material impact the
Company’s results of operations and financial position.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). This statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in accordance with GAAP. With the issuance of this statement,
the FASB concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed toward the entity
and not its auditor, and reside in the accounting literature established by the
FASB as opposed to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, “The Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This
statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.” The Company has evaluated the new statement and has determined that
it will not have a significant impact on the determination or reporting of its
financial results.
38
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
2 – Concentration of Credit Risk
The
Company maintains cash balances in financial institutions in excess of federally
insured limits.
Note
3 – Inventories
A summary
of inventories at December 31 is as follows:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Jewelry
|
$ | 10,925,247 | $ | 8,118,454 | ||||
Scrap
gold
|
636,843 | 414,099 | ||||||
Bullion
|
1,931,925 | 486,991 | ||||||
Rare
coins
|
1,827,294 | 3,482,248 | ||||||
Other
|
731,524 | 473,990 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,052,833 | $ | 12,975,782 |
Note
4 – Investments in Marketable Equity Securities
Marketable
equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheet
according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of
available-for-sale securities and their fair values at December 31, 2008 and
2007 are as follows:
Cost
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||||
Classified as
operating losses due
to long-term
impairment
|
Classified as
unrealized losses in
other comprehensive
income
|
|||||||||||||||
Equity
securities 2008
|
$ | 1,406,731 | $ | (1,406,731 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Equity
securities 2007
|
$ | 1,408,441 | $ | (1,249,474 | ) | $ | (97,288 | ) | $ | 61,769 |
At
December 31, 2008, management believes the equity shares owned in these publicly
traded stocks have declined on an other than temporary basis as these stocks are
thinly traded and have market values of less than $ .01 per share. As a result,
these investments were written-off in the amount of $115,992.
Note
5 – Property and Equipment
A summary
of property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as
follows:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Buildings
and improvements
|
$ | 3,175,242 | $ | 2,565,533 | ||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
1,224,457 | 812,833 | ||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
939,168 | 806,108 | ||||||
5,338,867 | 4,184,474 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
1,631,031 | 1,151,075 | ||||||
3,707,836 | 3,033,399 | |||||||
Land
|
1,160,470 | 1,160,470 | ||||||
Total
Property and Equipment
|
$ | 4,868,306 | $ | 4,193,869 |
During
2007, we sold the land and building at which our Dallas retail store and
corporate headquarters were previously located, which resulted in a net book
value disposition of $712,518. Additionally, the acquisition of
Superior Galleries and the purchase of our new land and buildings for our Dallas
retail store and corporate headquarters during the fourth quarter of 2007
resulted in a net addition of $3,691,579 to property and
equipment.
39
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
6 – Acquisitions
Superior Galleries,
Inc. On May 30, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Superior
Galleries, Inc., which we refer to as Superior, pursuant to an amended and
restated agreement and plan of merger and reorganization dated as of January 6,
2007, which we refer to as the merger agreement, with Superior and Stanford
International Bank Ltd., then Superior’s largest stockholder and its principal
lender, which we refer to as Stanford, as stockholder agent for the Superior
stockholders, whereby Superior became a wholly owned subsidiary of DGSE
Companies, Inc. Superior’s principal line of business is the sale of
rare coins on a retail, wholesale, and auction basis. Superior now
operates a store in Woodland Hills, CA. The total purchase price of
approximately $13.6 million was broken down as follows:
Shares
|
Stock Price
|
Extended Price
|
||||||||||
Common
stock
|
3,669,067 | $ | 2.55 | $ | 9,356,121 | |||||||
A
warrants
|
845,634 | 1.27 | (1) | 1,073,955 | ||||||||
B
warrants
|
863,000 | 2.55 | 2,220,650 | |||||||||
Exercise
Price B warrants
|
863,000 | $ | .001 | (863 | ) | |||||||
Direct
transaction costs
|
1,176,290 | |||||||||||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 13,806,153 |
|
(1)
|
The
$1.27 is the fair value of the warrants calculated under the Black Sholes
method as of the acquisition
date.
|
The total
purchase price has been allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed as follows:
Goodwill
|
$
|
8,203,448
|
||
Intangible
assets
|
2,521,340
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset
|
1,860,475
|
(1)
|
||
Property
and other assets
|
1,068,958
|
|||
Inventory
|
3,260,766
|
|||
Liabilities
assumed
|
(3,108,834
|
)
|
||
Total
purchase price
|
$
|
13,806,153
|
(1) Subsequent
to date of acquisition the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce goodwill and
increase deferred tax assets to reflect the change in estimated fair value of
the net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the Superior
acquisition.
In
accordance with SFAS 142, the goodwill will not be amortized but instead
tested for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142 at
least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain
events.
During
2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition
of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is
required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is
a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a
number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant
operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on
Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in
a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value.
An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken and it was determined that
it was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, the Company recorded a
non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill
related to Superior.
The
operating results of Superior have been included in the consolidated financial
statements since the acquisition date of May 30, 2007. The following unaudited
condensed consolidated financial information reflects the pro forma results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 as if the acquisition of
Superior had occurred on January 1 of 2007 after giving effect to purchase
accounting adjustments as compared to actual results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the effects of the discontinued operations related
to the auction segment.
40
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The pro
forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not
purport to be indicative of what operating results would have been had the
acquisition actually taken place at the beginning of the period, and may not be
indicative of future operating results (in thousands, except per share data):
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Pro
Forma
|
||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$ | 105,219 | $ | 73,565 | ||||
Net
earnings (loss)
|
$ | (7,851 | ) | $ | (2,922 | ) | ||
Net
earnings per share — basic
|
$ | (.81 | ) | $ | (.33 | ) | ||
Net
earnings per share — diluted
|
$ | (.81 | ) | $ | (.33 | ) | ||
Weighted
average shares — basic
|
9,708 | 8,582 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares — diluted
|
9,708 | 10,353 |
In
relation to the acquisition, as of June 29, 2007, Stanford and Dr. L.S.
Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, collectively had the power to
vote approximately 63% of our voting securities, and beneficially owned
approximately 56.4% of our voting securities on a fully-diluted basis (after
giving effect to the exercise of all options and warrants held by them which are
exercisable within sixty days of June 29, 2007 but not giving effect to the
exercise of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders
may have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of virtually all
corporate matters submitted to the vote of our common stockholders. Those
matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size and
composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations
involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and
Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which
entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate two “independent”
directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief
executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating
officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as each remains an executive
officer.
Through
this control of company nominations to our board of directors and through their
voting power, Stanford and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial
control over certain decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification
and appointment of officers, dividend policy, access to capital (including
borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of additional equity
securities), a merger or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition
or disposition of assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands
of Stanford and Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a
change in control of our company, even if the change in control would benefit
our other stockholders. The significant concentration of stock ownership may
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’
perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
Euless Gold & Silver,
Inc.
On May 9,
2007 we purchased all of the tangible assets of Euless Gold and Silver, Inc.,
located in Euless, Texas. The purchase price paid for these assets
totaled $1,000,000 including $600,000 in cash and a two year note in the amount
of $400,000. We opened a new retail store in the former Euless Gold
& Silver facility and operate under the name of Dallas Gold & Silver
Exchange. Of the assets received, $990,150 was inventory and the
remainder was fixed assets.
We
entered into these transactions seeing them as opportunistic acquisitions that
would allow us to expand our operations and provide a platform for future
growth.
41
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
7 – Goodwill
The
Company recognized an increase in goodwill as a result of the Superior
Galleries, Inc. acquisition during 2007. At December 31, goodwill was
reflected for the following reporting units:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Superior
Galleries, Inc.
|
$ | — | $ | 8,115,064 | ||||
Wholesale
watch sales
|
$ | 837,117 | $ | 837,117 | ||||
Total
Goodwill
|
$ | 837,117 | $ | 8,952,181 |
During
2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition
of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is
required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is
a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a
number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant
operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on
Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in
a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value.
An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken, which considered two
methodologies to determine the fair-value of the entity:
|
·
|
A
market capitalization approach, which measure market capitalization at the
measurement date.
|
|
·
|
A
discounted cash flow approach, which entails determining fair value using
a discounted cash flow methodology. This method requires
significant judgment to estimate the future cash flow and to determine the
appropriate discount rates, growth rates, and other
assumptions.
|
Each of
these methodoligies the Company believes has merit, and resulted in the
determination that goodwill was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the
impairment, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which
eliminated the value of the goodwill related to Superior.
No
impairment losses were recognized during 2007 or 2006.
Note
8 – Notes Payable
At
December 31, 2008, the Company was obligated to various individuals under
unsecured, demand notes bearing annual interest rates of 8% to 12% totaling
$191,078.
At
December 31, 2007, the Company was obligated to various individuals under
unsecured, demand notes bearing annual interest rates of 8% to 12% totaling
$187,468.
At
December 31, 2006, the Company was obligated to various individuals under
unsecured, demand notes bearing annual interest rates of 8% to 12% totaling
$183,708.
42
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
9 – Long-Term Debt
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
A
summary of long-term debt at December 31, follows:
|
||||||||
Revolving
promissory notes payable to bank, a note of $3,595,000 at December 31,
2008 and 2007 which bears interest at prime plus 1-1/2% (4.25% and 9.5% at
December 31, 2008 and 2007), respectively, and is due June 22, 2009 and a
note of $1,000,000 which bears interest at prime plus 1-1/2% ( 4.25 and
9.5% at December 31, 2008 and 2007), respectively, is due in equal monthly
installments of $16,667 through June 2009. Balance of note was $399,976
and $584,721 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The defined
borrowing base requirement is based on eligible trade receivables and
inventory. As of December 31, 2008, available but unused borrowing
capacity on the revolver was $0. These notes are secured by all accounts
receivable, inventory, property and equipment and intangible assets. The
notes contain certain covenants, restricting payment of dividends, and
requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. In addition to
the above, the Company has an additional $11,500,000 line of credit with
Stanford International Bank, LTD. Interest on this facility is at the
prime rate, as reported in the Wall Street Journal and the facility will
mature and become due in May 2011. Of this line, $9,200,000 has been drawn
against, most of which related to the Superior Galleries acquisition. As
of December 31, 2008, $2,300,000 was available to us.
|
$ | 13,194,976 | $ | 10,879,721 | ||||
Our mortgage
payable as of December 31, 2008 is due in monthly installments of $22,744,
including interest of 6.70% with a balance due in August
2016.
|
2,332,484 | 2,435,364 | ||||||
Note
payable, due in quarterly payments of $57,691 including interest of
8.25%. The final payment is due May 1, 2009
|
110,791 | 315,128 | ||||||
Note
payable, due January 2, 2009. Interest is payable monthly at a rate of
8%
|
247,556 | 310,556 | ||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
24,930 | 50,763 | ||||||
15,910,737 | 13,991,532 | |||||||
Line
of credit
|
(3,595,000 | ) | ||||||
Less
current maturities
|
(599,972 | ) | (501,631 | ) | ||||
$ | 11,715,765 | $ | 13,489,901 |
The
following table summarizes the aggregate maturities of long-term debt and
payments on the capital lease obligations and reflects the revised maturities
from refinancing of certain long-term debt subsequent to year-end:
December
31,
|
Long-term Debt
|
Obligations
under
Capital Leases
|
Totals
|
|||||||||
2009
|
$ | 4,173,977 | $ | 21,048 | $ | 4,195,025 | ||||||
2010
|
99,109 | 3,882 | 102,991 | |||||||||
2011
|
9,300,280 | — | 9,300,280 | |||||||||
2012
|
107,209 | — | 107,209 | |||||||||
2013
|
362,172 | — | 362,172 | |||||||||
Thereafter
|
1,843,060 | — | 1,843,060 | |||||||||
15,885,807 | 24,930 | 15,910,737 | ||||||||||
Less
current portion
|
(578,924 | ) | (21,048 | ) | (599,972 | ) | ||||||
Less
line of credit
|
(3,595,000 | ) | — | (3,595,000 | ) | |||||||
$ | 11,711,883 | $ | 3,882 | $ | 11,715,765 |
43
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
10 – Earnings Per Common Share
A
reconciliation of the income and shares of the basic earnings per common share
and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 is as follows:
Net
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Per Share
|
||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | (7,851,207 | ) | 9,708,045 | $ | (0.81 | ) | |||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
— | — | ||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | (7,851,207 | ) | 9,708,045 | $ | (0.81 | ) | |||||
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 755,019 | 7,507,579 | $ | 0.10 | |||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
— | 774,308 | ||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 755,019 | 8,281,887 | $ | 0.09 | |||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 611,245 | 4,913,920 | $ | 0.12 | |||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
— | 92,989 | ||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 611,245 | 5,006,909 | $ | 0.12 |
Note
11 – Stock Options
The
Company has granted stock options to key employees and directors to purchase
shares of the Company’s common stock. Each option issued vests
according to schedules designated by the Board of Directors, not to exceed three
years. The exercise price is based upon the estimated fair market
value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, and is payable when
the option is exercised.
Prior to
January 1, 2006, the Company elected to follow Accounting Principles Board
Opinion (APB) NO.25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations to account for its employee and
director stock options, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments, (SFAS
No. 123(R) for all share-based payment awards to employees and directors
including employee stock options. In addition, the Company has
applied the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107),
issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our adoption of SFAS No.
123(R).
The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified-prospective-transition
method. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation
expense recognized after the effective date includes: (1)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimate in
accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (2) compensation
cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based
on the grant-date fair value estimate in accordance with the provision of SFAS
No. 123. Results from prior periods have not been restated and do not
include the impact of SFAS No. 123(R). Stock-based compensation
expense under SFAS No. 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $0,
relating to employee and director stock options and our employee stock purchase
plan. Stock-based compensation expense under the provision of APB No.
25 for the year ended December 31, 2006 was insignificant.
44
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized each period is based on the value of the portion
of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the
period. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the
time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. In our pro forma disclosures
required under SFAS No. 123 for periods prior to 2006, the Company accounted for
forfeitures as they occurred.
Upon
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing formula to value share-based payments granted to employees
subsequent to January 1, 2006 and elected to attribute the value of stock-based
compensation to expense using the straight-line single option
method. These methods were previously used for the Company’s pro
forma information required under SFAS No. 123.
On
November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for
Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards”, which detailed an alternative
transition method for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation
pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). This alternative transition method included
simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in
capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No.
123(R). As of December 31, 2008, we have not recorded the tax effects
of employee stock-based compensation and have made no adjustments to the APIC
pool.
SFAS No.
123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from
tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options
(excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. As there have
been no stock options exercised, we have not reported these excess tax benefits
as of December 31, 2008.
The
following table summarizes the activity in common shares subject to options for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
At
December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
Shares
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
1,479,252 | $ | 2.13 | 1,403,134 | $ | 2.03 | 1,403,134 | $ | 2.03 | |||||||||||||||
Granted
|
— | 6.00 | 126,468 | 9.22 | — | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(21,097 | ) | 0.00 | (50,350 | ) | 14.36 | — | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at end of year
|
1,458,155 | $ | 2.17 | 1,479,252 | $ | 2.35 | 1,403,134 | $ | 2.03 | |||||||||||||||
Options
exercisable at end of year
|
1,418,155 | $ | 2.16 | 1,417,645 | $ | 2.13 | 1,403,134 | $ | 2.03 |
During
the year ended December 31, 2007, there have been 50,000 options granted to our
non-employee directors under this plan and, as a result, there are 700,000
shares available for future grants under the 2006 Plan.
45
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Information
about Plan stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008 is summarized as
follows:
Options outstanding
|
|||||||||
Weighted average
|
|||||||||
Number
|
remaining
|
Weighted average
|
|||||||
Range of exercise prices
|
outstanding
|
contractual life
|
exercise price
|
||||||
$1.12
|
267,857 |
4
years
|
$ | 1.12 | |||||
$1.13
to $2.25
|
1,072,777 |
4
years
|
$ | 2.21 | |||||
$2.26
to $2.82
|
35,000 |
4
years
|
$ | 2.60 | |||||
$2.83
to $4.19
|
17,500 |
1
years
|
$ | 3.88 | |||||
$6.00
|
50,000 |
9
years
|
$ | 6.00 | |||||
$13.91 to $15.56 | 15,021 |
3 years
|
$ | 14.06 | |||||
14,458,155 |
Options exercisable
|
||||||||
Number
|
Weighted
average
|
|||||||
Range of exercise prices
|
exercisable
|
exercise price
|
||||||
$1.12
|
267,857 | $ | 1.12 | |||||
$1.13
to $2.25
|
1,072,777 | $ | 2.21 | |||||
$2.26
to $2.82
|
35,000 | $ | 2.60 | |||||
$2.83
to $4.19
|
17,500 | $ | 3.88 | |||||
$6.00
|
10,000 | $ | 6.00 | |||||
$13.91 to $15.56 | 15,021 | $ | 14.06 | |||||
1,418,155 |
Note
12 – Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive
income at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
Before-Tax
|
Net-of-Tax
|
|||||||||||
Amount
|
Tax Benefit
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
Accumulated
comprehensive income (loss) at
January 1, 2006 |
$ | (162,071 | ) | $ | 34,819 | $ | (127,252 | ) | ||||
Unrealized
holding losses arising during 2006
|
(7,519 | ) | 2,572 | (4,993 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated
comprehensive income (loss) at
December 31, 2006 |
(169,590 | ) | 37,391 | (132,245 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized
holding losses arising during 2007
|
25,714 | 9,197 | 34,957 | |||||||||
Accumulated
comprehensive income (loss) at
December 31, 2007 |
(143,876 | ) | 46,588 | (97,288 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized
holding gains arising during 2008
|
(59,906 | ) | 19,294 | (40,508 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated
comprehensive income (loss)
prior to being written off |
(203,782 | ) | 65,882 | (137,796 | ) | |||||||
Write-off
of securities
|
203,782 | (65,882 | ) | 137,796 | ||||||||
Accumulated
comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 2008
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
46
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
13 – Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets represent the customer base and trade name resulting from the Superior
Acquisition as follows:
December 31, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
|||||||
Customer
base
|
$ | 401,333 | $ | 430,000 | ||||
Trade
name
|
$ | 2,091,340 | $ | 2,091,340 | ||||
Intangible
assets
|
$ | 2,492,673 | $ | 2,521,340 |
Only the
customer base intangible asset will be subject to amortization and will be
amortized over a 15 year life. The accumulated amortization as of
December 31, 2008 is $28,667.
Note
14 – Income Taxes
The
income tax provision reconciled to the tax computed at the statutory Federal
rate follows:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Tax
expense at statutory
rate
|
$ | (2,801,643 | ) | $ | 272,658 | $ | 316,484 | |||||
Goodwill
impairment
|
2,783,051 | — | — | |||||||||
Other
|
(30,542 | ) | (30,254 | ) | 3,323 | |||||||
Tax
expense
|
(49,134 | ) | 242,404 | 319,807 | ||||||||
Current
|
53,694 | 77,424 | 323,653 | |||||||||
Deferred
|
(102,828 | ) | 164,980 | (3,846 | ) | |||||||
Total
|
$ | (49,134 | ) | $ | 242,404 | $ | 319,807 |
Deferred
income taxes are comprised of the following at December 31, 2008 and
2007:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax assets (liabilities):
|
||||||||
Inventory
|
$ | 123,655 | $ | 90,546 | ||||
Allowance
for bad
debt
|
33,293 | — | ||||||
Unrealized
loss on available for sale securities
|
(4,969 | ) | 46,588 | |||||
Property
and
equipment
|
(8,389 | ) | (12,764 | ) | ||||
Capital
loss
carryover
|
8,366 | 8,366 | ||||||
Superior
acquisition
|
1,849,968 | 1,766,361 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
(93,892 | ) | (93,892 | ) | ||||
Total
deferred tax
assets
|
$ | 1,908,032 | $ | 1,805,205 |
Note
15 – Operating Leases
The
Company leases certain of its facilities under operating leases. The
minimum rental commitments under noncancellable operating leases as of December
31, 2008 are as follows:
Year
Ending
|
Lease
|
|||
December 31,
|
Obligations
|
|||
2009
|
$ | 681,054 | ||
2010
|
645,192 | |||
2011
|
611,827 | |||
2012
|
606,804 | |||
Thereafter
|
148,656 | |||
|
$ |
2,693,533
|
Rent
expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately
$595,770, $437,069 and $201,810 respectively.
47
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
16 – Discontinued Operations
In
November 2008 we decided to discontinue the live auction segment of the
Company’s business activities. This decision was based on the substantial losses
being incurred by this operating segment during 2008. As a result, the operating
results of the auction segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations
for both 2008 and 2007. During 2008 the auction segment incurred a pretax loss
of $2,379,151.
The
following summarizes the carrying amount of assets and liabilities of the
auction segment as of December 31, 2008:
Assets
|
||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 900,306 | ||
Current
assets
|
$ | 900,306 | ||
Long-term
receivable
|
$ | 305,275 | ||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,205,581 | ||
Liabilities
|
||||
Auctions
payable
|
$ | 33,144 | ||
Total
liabilities
|
$ | 33,144 |
On July
13, 2007, we sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations
for $77,496 and discontinued operations in those locations. The
receivables sold, including interest due, had a balance of $120,573 at the time
of the sale. The sales price was determined based on the age of the
outstanding receivables. As a result of the sale and discontinued
operations, we recognized a pretax loss of $107,838 on the disposal and a pretax
loss on discontinued operations of $51,938 for the year ended December 31,
2007.
As a
result, operating results from these business segments have been reclassified to
discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of December 31,
2008 there were no operating assets to be disposed of or liabilities to be paid
in completing the disposition of these operations.
Note
17 – Segment Information
Management
identifies reportable segments by product or service offered. Each
segment is managed separately. Corporate and other includes certain general and
administrative expenses not allocated to segments, pay day lending and pawn
operations. The Company’s operations by segment were as
follows:
48
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In
thousands)
|
Retail
Jewelry
|
Wholesale
Jewelry
|
Bullion
|
Rare
Coins
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
Corporate
and Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 36,592 | $ | 5,125 | $ | 45,449 | $ | 15,913 | $ | — | $ | 2,140 | $ | 105,219 | ||||||||||||||
2007
|
19,338 | 5,785 | 21,153 | 13,921 | — | 1,271 | 61,469 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
16,519 | 5,997 | 16,252 | 4,697 | — | 618 | 44,083 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
1,698 | 71 | 139 | 179 | (1,570 | ) | (8,368 | ) | (7,851 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
319 | 197 | 235 | 8 | 42 | (46 | ) | 755 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
143 | 270 | 148 | 101 | — | (51 | ) | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
23,396 | 1,710 | 1,955 | 1,827 | 1,206 | 1,250 | 31,344 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
16,132 | 2,164 | 536 | 4,314 | 2,139 | 11,574 | 36,859 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
10,020 | 1,940 | 114 | 235 | — | 837 | 11,830 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
Expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
1,081 | — | 6 | — | — | 10 | 1,097 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
3,126 | — | 23 | — | — | 274 | 3,423 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
11 | — | — | — | — | 31 | 285 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
140 | — | 104 | 104 | 48 | 89 | 485 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
130 | — | 33 | 32 | 32 | 27 | 254 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
107 | — | — | — | — | 32 | 142 |
49
DGSE
COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - continued
December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note
18 – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
1st Quarter
|
2nd Quarter
|
3rd Quarter
|
4th Quarter
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 32,175 | $ | 25,715 | $ | 23,994 | $ | 23,335 | ||||||||
Operating
profit
|
1,051 | 557 | 1,085 | 962 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
182 | 278 | 166 | (8,477 | ) | |||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.86 | ) | |||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.86 | ) | |||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 10,240 | $ | 12,220 | $ | 16,154 | $ | 22,993 | ||||||||
Operating
profit
|
384 | 263 | (5 | ) | 534 | |||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
182 | 271 | 108 | 84 | ||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 9,721 | $ | 12,546 | $ | 9,609 | $ | 12,207 | ||||||||
Operating
profit
|
302 | 484 | 242 | 295 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
148 | 271 | 108 | 84 | ||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 |
50