Envela Corp - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ___ to ___
Commission
File Number 1-11048
DGSE
Companies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
88-0097334
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
11311
Reeder Road
Dallas,
Texas 75229
(972) 484-3662
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone
number,
including area code, of registrant’s
principal
executive offices)
NONE
(Former
name, former address and former
fiscal
year, if changed since last report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company þ
|
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of August 12, 2009:
Class
|
Outstanding
|
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value per share
|
9,833,635
|
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Page No.
|
|
Item
1.
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008
|
2
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008
|
3
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
12
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
17
|
|
|
|||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
18
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
19
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information.
|
19
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits.
|
19
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
i
DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
June
30,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
Unaudited
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash
equivalents
|
$ | 1,244,871 | $ | 244,429 | ||||
Trade
receivables
|
1,459,641 | 2,326,337 | ||||||
Inventories
|
15,773,614 | 16,052,833 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
675,888 | 533,318 | ||||||
Prepaid
federal income
tax
|
536,599 | 639,372 | ||||||
Current
assets of discontinued
operations
|
--0-- | 900,306 | ||||||
Total
current
assets
|
19,690,613 | 20,696,595 | ||||||
Property
and equipment,
net
|
4,797,727 | 4,868,306 | ||||||
Deferred
income
taxes
|
1,857,901 | 1,908,032 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
837,117 | 837,117 | ||||||
Intangible
assets
|
2,464,006 | 2,492,673 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
282,401 | 235,917 | ||||||
Non-current
assets of discontinued operations
|
305,275 | 305,275 | ||||||
$ | 30,235,040 | $ | 31,343,915 | |||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ | 44,971 | $ | 191,078 | ||||
Current
maturities of long-term
debt
|
340,357 | 599,972 | ||||||
Line
of
credit
|
3,195,000 | 3,595,000 | ||||||
Accounts
payable –
trade
|
320,525 | 734,906 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
108,461 | 647,536 | ||||||
Customer
deposits
|
982,748 | 1,230,991 | ||||||
Current
liabilities of discontinued operations
|
--0--- | 33,144 | ||||||
Total
current
liabilities
|
4,992,062 | 7,032,627 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, less current
maturities
|
11,723,285 | 11,715,765 | ||||||
16,715,347 | 18,748,392 | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,833,635 and
9,833,635 shares issued and outstanding at the end of each period in 2009
and 2008, respectively
|
98,337 | 98,337 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
18,546,812 | 18,541,662 | ||||||
Retained
deficit
|
(5,125,456 | ) | (6,044,476 | ) | ||||
13,519,693 | 12,595,523 | |||||||
$ | 30,235,040 | $ | 31,343,915 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
1
DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six
months ended
June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Unaudited
|
||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||
Sales
|
$ | 46,973,641 | $ | 56,757,456 | ||||
46,973,641 | 56,757,456 | |||||||
Costs
and expenses
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods
sold
|
40,391,750 | 50,043,731 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
4,585,826 | 4,977,240 | ||||||
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
117,682 | 131,633 | ||||||
45,095,528 | 55,152,604 | |||||||
Operating
income
|
1,878,383 | 1,640,852 | ||||||
Other
expense (income)
|
||||||||
Other
income
|
--- | (11,635 | ) | |||||
Interest
expense
|
384,556 | 345,636 | ||||||
Earnings
before income
taxes
|
1,493,827 | 1,270,851 | ||||||
Income
tax
expense
|
233,183 | 343,980 | ||||||
Net
earnings from continuing operations
|
1,260,644 | 926,871 | ||||||
Discontinued
operations:
|
||||||||
Gain
(Loss) from discontinued operations (less applicable income tax of
$(63,143) and $10,459, respectively)
|
(341,624 | ) | 40,308 | |||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 919,020 | $ | 967,179 | ||||
Earnings
per common share – basic and diluted
|
||||||||
From
continuing
operations
|
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
From
discontinued
operations
|
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||
Net
earnings per common
share
|
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.09 | ||||
Weighted
average number of common shares
|
||||||||
Basic
|
9,833,635 | 9,498,729 | ||||||
Diluted
|
9,833,635 | 10,344,363 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
2
DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
months ended
June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Unaudited
|
||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||
Sales
|
$ | 21,633,859 | $ | 25,145,908 | ||||
Consumer loan service
charges
|
-0- | -0- | ||||||
21,633,859 | 25,145,908 | |||||||
Costs
and expenses
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods
sold
|
18,206,607 | 21,927,979 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
2,283,504 | 2,611,337 | ||||||
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
67,231 | 58,651 | ||||||
20,557,342 | 24,597,967 | |||||||
Operating
income
|
1,076,517 | 547,941 | ||||||
Other
expense (income)
|
||||||||
Other
income
|
--- | (11,633 | ) | |||||
Interest
expense
|
237,472 | 175,197 | ||||||
Earnings
before income
taxes
|
839,045 | 384,377 | ||||||
Income
tax
expense
|
179,137 | 17,360 | ||||||
Net
earnings from continuing operations
|
659,908 | 367,017 | ||||||
Discontinued
operations:
|
||||||||
Income
from discontinued operations (less applicable income tax benefit of $8,034
and $5,805, respectively)
|
29,596 | 122,907 | ||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 689,504 | $ | 489,924 | ||||
Earnings
per common share – basic and diluted
|
||||||||
From
continuing
operations
|
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
From
discontinued
operations
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | (.01 | ) | |||
Net
earnings per common
share
|
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Weighted
average number of common shares
|
||||||||
Basic
|
9,833,635 | 9,498,729 | ||||||
Diluted
|
9,833,635 | 10,344,363 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
3
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six
months ended
June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
Unaudited
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 919,020 | $ | 967,179 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
117,682 | 131,633 | ||||||
Deferred
income
taxes
|
50,131 | 88,074 | ||||||
Loss
on marketable
securities
|
-- | 41,237 | ||||||
Gain
on disposal of discontinued operations
|
(380,895 | ) | -- | |||||
(Increase)
decrease in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Trade
receivables
|
875,159 | (1,526,674 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
279,219 | (2,008,782 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
( 142,570 | ) | (254,250 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued
expenses
|
(1,098,890 | ) | 2,028,613 | |||||
Customer
deposits
|
(248,243 | ) | 876,197 | |||||
Federal
income taxes
payable
|
102,773 | 254,810 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
(46,484 | ) | 81,589 | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
426,902 | 679,626 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Pawn
loans
made
|
(635,020 | ) | (617,382 | ) | ||||
Pawn
loans
repaid
|
328,074 | 291,528 | ||||||
Recovery
of pawn loan principal through sale of forfeited
collateral
|
298,483 | 315,363 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of discontinued operations
|
1,324,450 | -- | ||||||
Merger
costs
paid
|
-- | (61,699 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of property and
equipment
|
(90,352 | ) | (644,825 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
1,225,635 | (717,015 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from line of
credit
|
-- | 1,250,000 | ||||||
Payments
of capital
lease
|
-- | (3,972 | ) | |||||
Repayments
of notes
payable
|
(652,095 | ) | (811,136 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(652,095 | ) | 434,892 | |||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
1,000,442 | 397,503 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
244,429 | 536,548 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
$ | 1,244,871 | $ | 934,051 |
Supplemental
disclosures:
Interest
paid for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $237,472 and $175,941,
respectively.
Income
taxes paid for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0 and $0,
respectively.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)
Basis of Presentation.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries include the financial statements of DGSE
Companies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, DGSE Corporation, National
Jewelry Exchange, Inc., Charleston Gold and Diamond Exchange, Inc., Superior
Galleries, Inc. Superior Precious Metals, Inc., American Gold and Diamond
Exchange, Inc, and Superior Estate Buyers, Inc. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for
a fair presentation have been included.
The
interim financial statements of DGSE Companies, Inc. included herein have been
prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the Commission's rules and regulations,
although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. We suggest that these financial statements
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. In
our opinion, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements contain all
adjustments, consisting only of those of a normal recurring nature, necessary to
present fairly its results of operations and cash flows for the periods
presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year. Certain reclassifications were made to the prior year's
consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year
presentation.
In
December 2008, we decided to discontinue the live auction segment of our
business activities. This decision was based on the substantial
losses being incurred by this operating segment during 2008. As a
result, certain sections of the Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes have been reclassified to present the results of the auction segment
activities as discontinued operations.
In June
2009, the Company sold the assets of National Jewelry Exchange, Inc. (our two
pawnshops) to an unrelated third party for cash in the amount of $ 1,324.450.
The proceeds were used to retire $400,000 of our bank debt and the balance was
used for working capital. As a result, operating results from National Jewelry
Exchange have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
(2) Inventory.
A summary
of inventories is as follows:
June 30,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
Jewelry
|
$ | 9,939,555 | $ | 10,925,247 | ||||
Rare
coins
|
2,495,797 | 1,827,294 | ||||||
Bullion
|
2,875,684 | 1,931,925 | ||||||
Scrap
gold
|
462,578 | 636,843 | ||||||
Other
|
-- | 731,524 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 15,773,614 | $ | 16,052,833 |
(3) Goodwill.
During
the fourth quarter of 2008, we reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the
acquisition of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, we are
required to undertake an annual impairment test at our year end or when there is
a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a
number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant
operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on
Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in
a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value.
An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken, which considered two
methodologies to determine the fair-value of the entity:
· A market
capitalization approach, which measure market capitalization at the measurement
date.
· A
discounted cash flow approach, which entails determining fair value using a
discounted cash flow methodology. This method requires significant
judgment to estimate the future cash flow and to determine the appropriate
discount rates, growth rates, and other assumptions.
5
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Each of
these methodologies we believe has merit, and resulted in the determination that
goodwill was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, we recorded a
non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill
related to Superior.
(5) Earnings
per share.
A
reconciliation of the earnings and shares of the basic earnings per common share
and diluted earnings per common share for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 is as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended June 30,
|
Three
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Per
share
|
Net
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Per
share
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 689,504 | 9,833,635 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 489,924 | 9,498,729 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | 845,634 | (.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 689,504 | 9,833,635 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 489,924 | 10,344,363 | $ | 0.04 |
Earnings
per common share from
continuing
operations:
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Six
months ended June 30,
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Per
share
|
Net
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Per
share
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | 919,020 | 9,833,635 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 967,159 | 9,498,729 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | 845,634 | (.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | 919,020 | 9,833,635 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 967,159 | 10,344,363 | $ | 0. 09 |
6
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(6) Business
segment information.
Management
identifies reportable segments by product or service offered. Each
segment is managed separately. Corporate and other includes certain general and
administrative expenses not allocated to segments and pawn
operations. Our operations by segment for the three months ended June
30 were as follows:
(In
thousands)
|
Retail
Jewelry
|
Wholesale
Jewelry
|
Precious
Metals
|
Rare
Coins
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
Corporate
and Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
$ | 5,597 | $ | 848 | $ | 10,329 | $ | 4,860 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 21,634 | ||||||||||||||
2008
|
7,758 | 1,139 | 11,993 | 4,256 | -- | -- | 25,146 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings (loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
348 | (30 | ) | 95 | 342 | 29 | (94 | ) | 690 | |||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
397 | 15 | 35 | 12 | 123 | (92 | ) | 490 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
21,121 | 1,793 | 1,958 | 3,006 | 305 | 2,052 | 30,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
20,478 | 2,177 | 1,180 | 3,790 | 3,131 | 10,606 | 41,362 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
-- | 837 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 837 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
-- | 837 | -- | -- | -- | 8,115 | 8,952 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
Expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
(15 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
248 | -- | -- | -- | 111 | -- | 359 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
67 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
32 | -- | 14 | 13 | -- | -- | 59 |
7
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Our
operations by segment for the Six months ended June 30 were as
follows:
(In
thousands)
|
Retail
Jewelry
|
Wholesale
Jewelry
|
Precious
Metals
|
Rare
Coins
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
Corporate
and Other
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
$ | 12,146 | $ | 1,800 | $ | 24,024 | $ | 9,003 | $ | -- | $ | --- | $ | 46,973 | ||||||||||||||
2008
|
14,271 | 2,497 | 28,856 | 11,133 | -- | -- | 56,757 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings (loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
508 | (81 | ) | 435 | 510 | (342 | ) | (111 | ) | 919 | ||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
606 | 47 | 371 | 24 | 29 | (110 | ) | 967 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Identifiable
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
21,121 | 1,793 | 1,958 | 3,006 | 305 | 2,052 | 30,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
20,478 | 2,177 | 1,180 | 3,790 | 31317 | 10,606 | 41,362 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
-- | 837 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 837 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
-- | 837 | -- | -- | -- | 8,115 | 8,952 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital
Expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
105 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 105 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
520 | -- | -- | -- | 125 | -- | 645 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
118 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 118 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
76 | -- | 28 | 27 | 62 | -- | 193 |
(7) Stock-based
Compensation.
Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No.
123(R) for all share based payment awards to employees and directors including
employee stock options granted under our employee stock option
plan. In addition, we have applied the provisions of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107), issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, in our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).
Stock-based
compensation expense under SFAS No. 123(R) for the months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, was $0 and $15,200, relating to employee and director
stock options and our employee stock purchase plan.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized each period is based on the value of the portion
of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the
period. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the
time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Upon
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing formula to value share-based payments granted to employees
subsequent to January 1, 2006 and elected to attribute the value of stock-based
compensation to expense using the straight-line single option
method.
8
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
On
November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for
Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards”, which detailed an alternative
transition method for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation
pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). This alternative transition method included
simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in
capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No.
123(R). As of June 30, 2009, we have not recorded the tax effects of
employee stock-based compensation and have made no adjustments to the APIC
pool.
SFAS No.
123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from
tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options
(excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. As there have
been no stock options exercised, we have not reported these excess tax benefits
as of June 30, 2009.
(8) Discontinued
Operations.
In
November 2008 we decided to discontinue the live auction segment of the
Company’s business activities. This decision was based on the substantial losses
being incurred by this operating segment during 2008. As a result, the operating
results of the auction segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations
for both 2008 and 2009. During the first six months of 2009 and 2008
the auction segment incurred pretax losses of $512,136 and $86,625,
respectively.
The
following summarizes the carrying amount of assets and liabilities of the
auction segment as of June 30, 2009:
Assets
|
||||
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 0 | ||
Current
assets
|
$ | 0 | ||
Long-term
receivable
|
$ | 305,275 | ||
Total
assets
|
$ | 305,275 | ||
Liabilities
|
||||
Auctions
payable
|
$ | 0 |
As a
result, operating results from the auction segment have been reclassified to
discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of June30,
2009, there were no operating assets to be disposed of or liabilities to be paid
in completing the disposition of these operations.
In June
2009 the Company sold the assets of National Jewelry Exchange, Inc.(the
Company’s two pawn shops) to an unrelated third party for cash in the amount of
$ 1,324,450. The proceeds were used to retire $400,000 of our bank debt and the
balance was used for working capital. As a result, operating results from
National Jewelry Exchange have been reclassified to discontinued operations for
all periods presented.
9
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(9) New
Accounting Pronouncements.
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB:”) issued Statement
No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No.
162” (“SFAS 168”). The codification will become the source of GAAP
recognized by the FASB. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 is not intended to change existing
GAAP and as such, it will not have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009.
In May
2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”) which
establishes accounting and disclosure requirements for subsequent
events. SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date
during which we should evaluate events or transactions that occur for potential
recognition or disclosure in our financial statements, the circumstances under
which we should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance
sheet date in our financial statements and the required disclosures for such
events or transactions. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and as such, we adopted SFAS 165
prospectively beginning in our quarterly period ended June 30,
2009. We have evaluated subsequent events through August 14, 2009,
the filing date of this report.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”), which amends the factors
that should be considered when developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of an intangible asset under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”, in order to improve consistency between SFAS No. 142 and the period of
expected cash flows to measure the fair value of the asset under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”
and other U.S. generally accepted accounting practices. Effective
January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP No. 142-3. The adoption of FSP No. 142-3 has not
had and is not expected to have a material impact our results of operations
and financial position.
In March
2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires entities to proved enhanced
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments and that
the objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of
underlying risk and accounting designation, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, “Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and its related interpretations,
including a tabular format disclosure of the fair values of derivative
instruments and their gains and losses and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS 161 encourages, but
does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial
adoption. We adopted SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009 and it did not have
an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”
(“SFAS No. 141(R)”), which establishes principles for how the acquirer
recognizes and measures in the financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree. This statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring
the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Effective
January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 141(R). No
business combinations were completed in the first quarter of 2009. However, to
the extent that future business combinations are material, our adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly impact our accounting and reporting
for future acquisitions, principally as a result of (i) expanded
requirements to value acquired assets, liabilities and contingencies at their
fair values; and (ii) the requirement that acquisition-related transaction
and restructuring costs be expensed as incurred rather than capitalized as a
part of the cost of the acquisition.
10
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We
adopted FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Incomes Taxes – An Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN48”) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions by prescribing the
recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized
in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. We had no unrecognized tax
benefits and no accrued interest or penalties recognized as of the date of our
adoption of FIN 48. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, there were no changes in our unrecognized tax benefits, and we had no
accrued interest or penalties as of June 30, 2009.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to
measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected will be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, we
adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 except as it applies to those nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities. Due to the fact that management
has not elected to use the fair value option for eligible items, the adoption
has not resulted in any financial impact on our results of operations and
financial position.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measures” (“SFAS No.
157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS
157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for those that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually),
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within
those fiscal years. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 partially
on January 1, 2008 and on January 1, 2009 relating to nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities and it did not have a significant impact on our results
of operations or financial position.
11
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking
Statements
The
statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report
are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will,"
“would,” "expect," "intend," “could,” "estimate,"
“should,” "anticipate" or "believe." We believe that the
expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are
accurate. However, we cannot assure you that these expectations will
occur. Our actual future performance could differ materially from such
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these
differences include, but are not limited to:
· uncertainties
regarding price fluctuations in the price of gold and other precious
metals;
· our
ability to manage inventory fluctuations and sales;
· changes
in governmental rules and regulations applicable to the specialty financial
services industry;
· the
results of any unfavorable litigation;
· interest
rates;
· economic
pressures affecting the disposable income available to our
customers;
· our
ability to maintain an effective system of internal controls;
· the other
risks detailed from time to time in our SEC reports.
Additional
important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
our expectations are discussed under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. You should not
unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
of this report. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly
release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
Our
Business
We buy
and sell jewelry, bullion products and rare coins. Our customers
include individual consumer, dealers and institutions throughout the United
States. In addition, we make collateralized loans to individuals in
the State of Texas. Our products and services are marketed through
our facilities in Dallas and Euless, Texas; Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina;
Woodland Hills, California and through our internet web sites DGSE.com;
CGDEinc.com; SGBH.com; SuperiorPreciousMetals.com; SuperiorEstateBuyers.com;
USBullionExchange.com; Americangoldandsilverexchange.com; and
FairchildWatches.com.
We
operate eight primary internet sites and over 900 related landing sites on the
World Wide Web. Through the various sites we operate a virtual store,
real-time auction of rare coin and jewelry products, free quotations of current
prices on all commonly traded precious metal and related products, trading in
precious metals, a mechanism for selling unwanted jewelry, rare coins and
precious metals and wholesale prices and information exclusively for dealers on
pre-owned fine watches. Over 7,500 items are available for sale on our internet
sites including $2,000,000 in diamonds.
In June
2008, we moved Superior Galleries’ operations from Beverly Hills to Woodland
Hills, California. Superior’s principal line of business is the sale
of rare coins on a retail and wholesale basis. Superior’s retail and wholesale
operations are conducted in virtually every state in the United
States. Superior also conducted live and internet auctions for
customers seeking to sell their own coins prior to management’s decision to
discontinue the live auction operations. Superior markets its
services nationwide through broadcast and print media and independent sales
agents, as well as on the internet through third party websites, and through its
own website at SGBH.com.
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com,
the over 900 proprietary Internet sites related to the home page of
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com along with our existing locations in Texas,
California and South Carolina, provide customers from all over the United States
with a seamless and secure way to value and sell gold, silver, rare coins,
jewelry, diamonds and watches.
12
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Superior
Estate Buyers brings our unique expertise in the purchase of gold, silver,
diamonds, rare coins and other collectibles to local markets with a team of
traveling professionals for short-term buying events. During 2008 Superior
Estate Buyers held approximately 24 such buying events. It is our
expectation that, over time, this activity will be expanded significantly with
the objective of having teams conducting events on a continuous
basis.
Superior
Precious Metals is the retail precious metals arm of DGSE. Professional account
managers provide a convenient way for individuals and companies to buy and sell
precious metals and rare coins. This activity is supported by the internally
developed account management and trading platform created as part of DGSE’s
USBullionExchange.com precious metals system.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Inventory. Jewelry and other
inventory is valued at lower-of-cost-or-market (specific
identification). Bullion inventory is valued at
lower-of-cost-or-market (average cost).
Accounts
Receivable. We record trade receivables when revenue is
recognized. No product has been consigned to
customers. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is primarily
determined by review of specific trade receivables. Those accounts
that are doubtful of collection are included in the allowance. These
provisions are reviewed to determine the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful
accounts. Trade receivables are charged off when
there is certainty as to their being uncollectible. Trade receivables
are considered delinquent when payment has not been made within contract
terms.
Revenue
Recognition. The Company generates revenue from wholesale and
retail sales of rare coins, precious metals bullion and second-hand jewelry. The
recognition of revenue varies for wholesale and retail transactions and is, in
large part, dependent on the type of payment arrangements made between the
parties. We recognize sales on an F.O.B. shipping point basis.
The
Company sells rare coins to other wholesalers/dealers within its industry on
credit, generally for terms of 14 to 60 days, but in no event greater than one
year. The Company grants credit to new dealers based on extensive credit
evaluations and for existing dealers based on established business relationships
and payment histories. The Company generally does not obtain collateral with
which to secure its accounts receivable when the sale is made to a dealer. The
Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses based on an evaluation of
specific receivables and the Company’s historical experience related to credit
losses.
Revenues
for monetary transactions (i.e., cash and receivables) with dealers are
recognized when the merchandise is shipped to the related dealer.
The
Company also sells rare coins to retail customers on credit, generally for terms
of 30 to 60 days, but in no event greater than one year. The Company grants
credit to retail customers based on extensive credit evaluations and for
existing retail customers based on established business relationships and
payment histories. When a retail customer is granted credit, the Company
generally collects a payment of 25% of the sales price, establishes a payment
schedule for the remaining balance and holds the merchandise as collateral as
security against the customer’s receivable until all amounts due under the
credit arrangement are paid in full. If the customer defaults in the payment of
any amount when due, the Company may declare the customer’s obligation in
default, liquidate the collateral in a commercially reasonable manner using such
proceeds to extinguish the remaining balance and disburse any amount in excess
of the remaining balance to the customer.
Under
this retail arrangement, revenues are recognized when the customer agrees to the
terms of the credit and makes the initial payment. The Company has a
limited-in-duration money back guaranty policy (as discussed
below).
In
limited circumstances, the Company exchanges merchandise for similar merchandise
and/or monetary consideration with both dealers and retail customers, for which
the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SFAS 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” When the Company exchanges merchandise
for similar merchandise and there is no monetary component to the exchange, the
Company does not recognize any revenue. Instead, the basis of the merchandise
relinquished becomes the basis of the merchandise received, less any indicated
impairment of value of the merchandise relinquished. When the Company exchanges
merchandise for similar merchandise and there is a monetary component to the
exchange, the Company recognizes revenue to the extent of monetary assets
received and determines the cost of sale based on the ratio of monetary assets
received to monetary and non-monetary assets received multiplied by the cost of
the assets surrendered.
13
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The
Company has a return policy (money-back guarantee). The policy covers retail
transactions involving graded rare coins only. Customers may return graded rare
coins purchased within 7 days of the receipt of the rare coins for a full refund
as long as the rare coins are returned in exactly the same condition as they
were delivered. In the case of rare coin sales on account, customers may cancel
the sale within 7 days of making a commitment to purchase the rare coins. The
receipt of a deposit and a signed purchase order evidences the commitment. Any
customer may return a coin if they can demonstrate that the coin is not
authentic, or there was an error in the description of a graded
coin.
Revenues
from the sale of consigned goods are recognized as commission income on such
sale if the Company is acting as an agent for the consignor. If in the process
of selling consigned goods, the Company makes an irrevocable payment to a
consignor for the full amount due on the consignment and the corresponding
receivable from the buyer(s) has not been collected by the Company at that
payment date, the Company records that payment as a purchase and the sale of the
consigned good(s) to the buyer as revenue as the Company has assumed all
collection risk.
Pawn
loans (“loans”) are made with the collateral of tangible personal property for
one month with an automatic 60-day extension period. Pawn service
charges are recorded at the time of redemption at the greater of $15 or the
actual interest accrued to date. If the loan is not repaid, the
principal amount loaned plus accrued interest (or the fair value of the
collateral, if lower) becomes the carrying value of the forfeited collateral
(“inventories”) which is recovered through sales to customers.
Fair Value Measures. In September
2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measures” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
enhances disclosures about fair value measures required under other accounting
pronouncements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an
instrument is carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. Effective January 1,
2008, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157.
SFAS No.
157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an
entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be
determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant
assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity
(observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy)
and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions
(unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1
inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs
other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs
that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such
as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable
at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the
asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as
there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the
determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different
levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within
which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to
the asset or liability. The adoption did not have any financial impact on the
Company’s results of operations and financial position.
14
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2008
Sales
decreased by $3,512,000 or 14.0%, during the three months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a
$2,160,000, or 27.8%, decrease in retail jewelry sales, a 1,664,000, or 13.9%,
decrease in the sale of precious metal products, and $291,000, or 25.5% decrease
in our wholesale jewelry sales during the second quarter of 2009 as compared to
2008. The decreases in precious metals sales were due to a less
volatile gold market. The decrease in jewelry sales was due to the
sluggish retail environment. Cost of goods as a percentage of
sales decreased from 87.2% in 2008 to 84.2% in 2009. This decrease
was due to the decrease in precious metals revenue as a percentage of total
sales.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by $327,833, or 12.8%, during the
three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 2008. This decrease was
primarily due to an overhead cost saving program that we began in the first
quarter of 2009.
The
increase in interest expense is due to renewal charges on our line of
credit.
Income
taxes are provided at the rate of 34.00 % and 35.61% for 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Historically,
changes in the market prices of precious metals have had a significant impact on
both revenues and cost of sales in the rare coin and precious metals segments in
which we operate. It is expected that due to the commodity nature of these
products, future price changes for precious metals will continue to be
indicative of our performance in these business segments. Changes in sales and
cost of sales in the retail and wholesale jewelry segments are primarily
influenced by the national economic environment. It is expected that this trend
will continue in the future due to the nature of these product.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Six Months Ended June 30,
2008
Sales
decreased by $9,783,815 or 17.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a
$2,125,000, or 14.9%, decrease in retail jewelry sales, a 4,832,000, or 16.7%,
decrease in the sale of precious metal products, a $2,130,000 or 19.1% decrease
in rare coin sales and a $697,000, or 27.9% decrease in our wholesale jewelry
sales during the first half of 2009 as compared to 2008. The
decreases in precious metals and rare coin sales were due to a less volatile
gold market. The decrease in jewelry sales was due to the sluggish retail
environment. Cost of goods as a percentage of sales decreased
from 88.1% in 2008 to 86.0% in 2009. This decrease was due to the
decrease in precious metals revenue as a percentage of total sales.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by $391,417, or 8.0%, during the
six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily
due to an overhead cost saving program that we began in the first quarter of
2009.
The
increase in interest expense is due to renewal charges on our line of
credit.
Income
taxes are provided at the rate of 34.00 % and 35.61% for 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We expect
capital expenditures to total approximately $100,000 during the next twelve
months. It is anticipated that these expenditures will be funded from
working capital and our credit facility. As of June 30, 2009 there
were no commitments outstanding for capital expenditures.
In the
event of significant growth in retail and or wholesale jewelry sales, the demand
for additional working capital will expand due to a related need to stock
additional jewelry inventory and increases in wholesale accounts
receivable. Historically, vendors have offered us extended payment
terms to finance the need for jewelry inventory growth and our management
believes that we will continue to do so in the future. Any
significant increase in wholesale accounts receivable will be financed under our
credit facility.
Our
ability to finance our operations and working capital needs are dependent upon
management’s ability to negotiate extended terms or refinance its
debt. We have historically renewed, extended or replaced short-term
debt as it matures and management believes that we will be able to continue to
do so in the near future.
15
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
From time
to time, we have adjusted our inventory levels to meet seasonal demand or in
order to meet working capital requirements. Management is of the opinion that if
additional working capital is required, additional loans can be obtained from
individuals or from commercial banks. If necessary, inventory levels
may be adjusted or a portion of our investments in marketable securities may be
liquidated in order to meet unforeseen working capital
requirements.
In
December 2005, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Texas
Capital Bank, N.A., which currently permits borrowings up to a maximum principal
amount of $3,500,000 and has a maturity date of June 22, 2010. Borrowings
under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security
interest in substantially all of our assets (other than the assets of Superior).
As of June 30, 2009, approximately $3,500,000 was outstanding under the
term loan and revolving credit facility. If we were to default under the
terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Texas Capital Bank would
have the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on our
assets in order to satisfy our indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a
material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and
financial position.
The
covenants associated with our credit facility with Texas Capital Bank, N.A.
exclude Superior Galleries are as follows:
As
of June 30, 2009
|
Requirement
|
Actual
calculation
|
||
Minimum
tangible net worth
|
10,500,000
|
12,838,477
|
||
Maximum
total liabilities to tangible net worth
|
Not
to exceed 1.00
|
.53
|
||
Minimum
debt service coverage
|
Must
be greater than 1.40
|
2.06
|
Upon the
consummation of our acquisition of Superior, and after the exchange by Stanford
of $8.4 million of Superior debt for shares of Superior common stock, Superior
amended and restated its credit facility with Stanford. The amended and restated
commercial loan and security agreement, which we refer to as the loan agreement,
decreased the available credit line from $19.89 million to $11.5 million,
reflecting the $8.4 million debt exchange. Interest on the outstanding principal
balance will continue to accrue at the prime rate, as reported in the Wall
Street Journal or, during an event of default, at a rate 5% greater than the
prime rate as so reported.
Loan
proceeds can only be used for customer loans inventory purchases and receivables
consistent with specified loan policies and procedures and for permitted
inter-company transactions. Permitted inter-company transactions are loans or
dividends paid to us or our other subsidiaries. We guaranteed the repayment of
these permitted inter-company transactions pursuant to a secured subordinated
guaranty in favor of Stanford. In connection with the secured
guarantee, Stanford and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., our primary lender, entered
into an intercreditor agreement with us, and we entered into a subordination
agreement with Superior, both of which subordinate Stanford's security interests
and repayment rights to those of Texas Capital Bank. As of June 30,
2009, approximately $9.2 million was outstanding under this credit facility
and there were no intercompany transactions outstanding.
This
credit facility matures on May 1, 2011, provided that in case any of several
customary events of default occurs, Stanford may declare the entire principal
amount of both loans due immediately and take possession and dispose of the
collateral described below. An event of default includes, among others, the
following events: failure to make a payment when due under the loan agreement;
breach of a covenant in the loan agreement or any related agreement; a
representation or warranty made in the loan agreement or related agreements is
materially incorrect; a default in repayment of borrowed money to any person; a
material breach or default under any material contract; certain bankruptcy or
insolvency events; and a default under a third-party loan. Superior
is obligated to repay the first revolving loan from the proceeds of the
inventory or other collateral purchased with the proceeds of the
loan.
The loans
are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of
Superior’s assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, promissory notes,
books and records and insurance policies, and the proceeds of the
foregoing. In addition, pursuant to the limited secured guaranty and
intercreditor arrangements described above, Stanford would have a second-order
security interest in all of our accounts and inventory to the extent of
intercompany transactions.
The loan
agreement includes a number of customary covenants applicable to Superior,
including, among others: punctual payments of principal and interest under the
credit facility; prompt payment of taxes, leases and other indebtedness;
maintenance of corporate existence, qualifications, licenses, intellectual
property rights, property and assets; maintenance of satisfactory insurance;
preparation and delivery of financial statements for us and separately for
Superior in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, tax
returns and other financial information; inspection of offices and collateral;
notice of certain events and changes; use of proceeds; notice of governmental
orders which may have a material adverse effect, SEC filings and stockholder
communications; maintenance of property and collateral; and payment of Stanford
expenses.
16
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In
addition, Superior has agreed to a number of negative covenants in the loan
agreement, including, among others, covenants not to: create or suffer a lien or
other encumbrance on any collateral, subject to customary exceptions; incur,
guarantee or otherwise become liable for any indebtedness, subject to customary
exceptions; acquire indebtedness of another person, subject to customary
exceptions and permitted inter-company transactions; issue or acquire any shares
of its capital stock; pay dividends other than permitted inter-company
transactions or specified quarterly dividends, or directors’ fees; sell or
abandon any collateral except in the ordinary course of business or consolidate
or merge with another entity; enter into affiliate transactions other than in
the ordinary course of business on fair terms or permitted inter-company
transactions; create or participate in any partnership or joint venture; engage
in a new line of business; pay principal or interest on subordinate debt except
as authorized by the credit facility; or make capital expenditures in excess of
$100,000 per fiscal year
We have
been informed that on February 19, 2009, a US district court placed SIBL under
the supervision of a receiver and that the court enjoined SIBL's creditors and
other persons from taking certain actions related to SIBL or its assets.
In addition, on the same date, Antiguan Financial Services Regulatory Commission
appointed a Receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd. This action was
subsequently ratified by the High Court of Justice in Antigua and
Barbuda. As a result of SIBL's current status, we do not believe that
Superior will be able to borrow additional funds under either revolving
loan, including any amounts Superior is obligated to repay to SIBL pursuant to
the repayment provisions applicable to the first revolving
note. We believe that certain terms of agreements entered into
by us, Superior and/or SIBL and its affiliates in connection with our
acquisition of Superior have been breached by SIBL or its affiliates, and we are
evaluating available remedies, including but not limited to damages from
responsible parties. While Superior does not currently require additional funds
under the SIBL credit facility, should the need arise and Superior is unable to
replace this credit facility the operations and performance of Superior could be
materially adversely affected.
From time
to time, we have adjusted our inventory levels to meet seasonal demand or in
order to meet working capital requirements. Management is of the opinion that if
additional working capital is required, additional loans can be obtained from
individuals or from commercial banks. If necessary, inventory levels
may be adjusted or a portion of our investments in marketable securities may be
liquidated in order to meet unforeseen working capital
requirements.
Payments due by
period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Cash Obligations |
Total
|
2009
|
2010
- 2011
|
2012 – 2013
|
Thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes
payable
|
$ | 3,239,971 | $ | 44,971 | $ | 3,195,000 | $ | -- | $ | -- | ||||||||||
Long-term
debt and capital leases
|
12,063,642 | 340,357 | 9,403,271 | 469,381 | 1,850,633 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
2,326,732 | 332,490 | 1,237,026 | 757,216 | -- | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 17,630,345 | $ | 717,818 | $ | 13,835,297 | $ | 1,226,597 | $ | 1,850,633 |
In
addition, we estimate that we will pay approximately $600,000 in interest during
the next twelve months.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The
following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in
interest rates and gold values. We are also exposed to regulatory risk in
relation to its pawn loans. We do not use derivative financial
instruments.
Our
earnings and financial position may be affected by changes in gold values and
the resulting impact on pawn lending and jewelry sales. The proceeds of scrap
sales and our ability to liquidate excess jewelry inventory at an acceptable
margin are dependent upon gold values. The impact on our financial position and
results of operations of a hypothetical change in gold values cannot be
reasonably estimated.
17
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Item
4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls
and procedures. An evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms
and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in internal
controls. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, there have been
no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
18
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
PART
II- OTHER INFORMATION
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We may,
from time to time, be involved in various claims, lawsuits, disputes with third
parties, actions involving allegations of discrimination, or breach of contract
actions incidental to the operation of its business. Except as set
forth above, we are not currently involved in any such litigation which we
believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
Item
5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
and Reports on Form 8-K.
|
Exhibits:
Exhibit No. |
Description
|
Filed Herein |
Incorporated by
Reference |
Form
|
Date
Filed with
SEC |
Exhibit No. |
||||||
2.1
|
Amended
and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of
January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
2.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
2.2
|
Limited
Joinder Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
2.9
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation dated September 17, 1965
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
3.2
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated October 14,
1981
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.2
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
3.3
|
Certificate
of Resolution, dated October 14, 1981
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.3
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
3.4
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation , dated July 15,
1986
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.4
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
3.5
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated August 23,
1998
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.5
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
3.6
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26,
1992
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.6
|
19
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
3.7
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26,
2001
|
×
|
8-K
|
July 3,
2001
|
1.0
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.8
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated May 22,
2007
|
x
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
3.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
3.9
|
By-laws,
dated March 2, 1992
|
×
|
8-A12G
|
June 23,
1999
|
3.7
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
4.1
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificate
|
×
|
S-4
|
January 6,
2007
|
4.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.1
|
Renewal,
Extension And Modification Agreement dated January 28, 1994, by and among
DGSE Corporation and Michael E. Hall And Marian E. Hall
|
×
|
10-KSB
|
March
1995
|
10.2
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.2
|
Lease
Agreement dated June 2, 2000 by and between SND Properties and
Charleston Gold and Diamond Exchange, Inc.
|
×
|
10-KSB
|
March 29,
2001
|
10.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.3
|
Lease
agreement dated October 5, 2004 by and between Beltline Denton Road
Associates and Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange
|
×
|
10-K
|
April 15,
2005
|
10.2
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.4
|
Lease
agreement dated December 1, 2004 by and between Stone Lewis Properties and
Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange
|
×
|
10-K
|
April 15,
2005
|
10.3
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.5
|
Lease
agreement dated November 18, 2004 by and between Hinkle Income Properties
LLC and American Pay Day Centers, Inc.
|
×
|
10-K
|
April 15,
2005
|
10.4
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.6
|
Lease
Agreement dated January 17, 2005 by and between Belle-Hall Development
Phase III Limited Partnership and DGSE Companies, Inc.
|
×
|
S-4
|
January 6,
2007
|
10.6
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
10.7
|
Sale
agreement dated executed July 5, 2007 by and between DGSE Companies,
Inc. and Texas Department of Transportation
|
×
|
8-K
|
July
11, 2007
|
10.1
|
20
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
10.8
|
Purchase
agreement dated July 5, 2007 by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and
11311 Reeder Road Holdings, LP
|
×
|
8-K
|
July
11, 2007
|
10.2
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.9
|
Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, between DGSE Companies,
Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A.
|
×
|
8-K/A
|
August 17,
2006
|
10.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.10
|
Third
Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2007, by and between DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A.
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
9, 2007
|
3.0
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.11
|
Support
Agreement, DGSE stockholders, dated as of January 6,
2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.1
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.12
|
Securities
Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.2
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.13
|
Warrant
to DiGenova, issued January 6, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.3
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.14
|
Support
Agreement, Superior stockholders, dated as of January 6,
2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
January 9,
2007
|
99.5
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||
10.15
|
Asset
purchase agreement, dated May 9, 2007, by and between DGSE
Companies, Inc. and Euless Gold & Silver, Inc.
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
9, 2007
|
1.0
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
10.16
|
Subordinated
Promissory Note dated May 9, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
9, 2007
|
2.0
|
|||||||
10.17
|
Registration
Rights Agreement with Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May
30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.1
|
|||||||
10.18
|
Corporate
Governance Agreement with Dr. L.S. Smith and Stanford International Bank
Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.2
|
21
DGSE
COMPANIES, Inc. and Subsidiaries
10.19
|
Escrow
Agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Stanford
International Bank Ltd., as stockholder agent, dated as of May 30,
2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.3
|
|||||||
10.20
|
Form
of Warrants
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.4
|
|||||||
10.21
|
Amended
and Restated Commercial Loan and Security Agreement, by and between
Superior Galleries Inc. and Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of
May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.5
|
|||||||
10.22
|
Employment
Agreement with L.S. Smith, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.6
|
|||||||
10.23
|
Employment
Agreement with William H. Oyster, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.7
|
|||||||
10.24
|
Employment
Agreement with John Benson, dated as of May 30, 2007
|
×
|
8-K
|
May
31, 2007
|
99.8
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
31.1
|
Certification
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr.
L.S. Smith
|
×
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
31.2
|
Certification
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John
Benson
|
×
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S.
Smith
|
×
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
32.2
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John
Benson
|
×
|
|
Reports
on Form 8-K :
None.
22
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
DGSE
Companies, Inc.
|
|||
Dated:
August 14, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ L. S. Smith | |
L. S. Smith | |||
Chairman of the Board, | |||
Chief Executive Officer and Secretary |
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
By: |
/s/
L. S. Smith
|
Dated: August 14, 2009 | |||
L.
S. Smith
|
|
||||
Chairman
of the Board,
Chief
Executive Officer and
Secretary
|
|
||||
By: | /s/ W. H. Oyster | Dated: August 14, 2009 | |||
W. H. Oyster | |||||
Director,
President and
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|||||
By: | /s/ John Benson | Dated: August 14, 2009 | |||
John Benson | |||||
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|