Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2021 September (Form 10-Q)

 

 

 

FORM

 

 

 

Commission File Number:

 

 

 

(951)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

S-T

non-accelerated

12b-2

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☒

12b-2

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of November

, 2021 was

.

 

 

 

		PAGE
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements:			1
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020			1
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020			2
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021			3
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020			4
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements			5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			20
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk			28
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			28
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			29
Item 1A. Risk Factors			31
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			31
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			31
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			31
Item 5. Other Information			31
Item 6. Exhibits			32
Signatures			33

•

Our ability to generate demand for our zero-emission commercial fleet vehicles in order to generate revenue.

•

Our ability to achieve independence from external sources for the financing of our operations.

•

Our ability to effectively execute our business plan.

•

Our ability and our suppliers’ ability to scale our zero-emission products assembling processes effectively and quickly from low volume production to high volume production.

•

Our ability to manage our expansion, growth and operating expenses and reduce and adequately control the costs and expenses associated with operating our business.

•

Our ability to obtain, retain and grow our customers.

•

Our ability to enter into, sustain and renew strategic relationships on favorable terms.

•

Our ability to achieve and sustain profitability.

•

Our ability to evaluate and measure our current business and future prospects.

•

Our ability to compete and succeed in a highly competitive and evolving industry.

•

Our ability to respond and adapt to changes in electric vehicle technology.

•

Our ability to protect our intellectual property and to develop, maintain and enhance a strong brand.

 

 

1

 

 

2

 

 

3

 

 

4

zero-emission

The Compa

’

zero-emission

The Company was formerly known as ADOMANI, Inc. On May 26, 2021, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation the Company with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to change its name from ADOMANI, Inc. to Envirotech Vehicles, Inc., effective as of May 26, 2021.

’

o

t

he Company

’

s

8-K/A

—The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, notes receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 820, “Fair Value Measurement” defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly

 

5

transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market data and that require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities that are required to be measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

zero-emission

In applying ASC Topic 606, the Company is required to:

(1) dentify any contracts with customers

(2) etermine if multiple performance obligations exist

(3) etermine the transaction price

(4) llocate the transaction price to the respective obligation; and

(5) ecognize the revenue as the obligation is satisfied.

Product revenue also includes the sale of electric trucks and cargo vans. These sales represent a single performance obligation with revenue recognition occurring at the time title transfers. Transfer of title occurs when the customer has accepted the vehicle and signed the appropriate documentation acknowledging receipt.

all-electric

(“e-trikes”),

all-electric

Due to significant impacts of Covid-19 restrictions on the tourist industry in the Philippines, the market to which GerWeiss primarily sold the e-trikes to, they have not been able to complete the current 50 units in production. We do not expect that we will receive the e-trikes nor have our deposit returned, and therefore have fully reserved that amount in the three months ended September 30, 2021.

Other revenue includes performing basic vehicle maintenance and detailing, as well as safety inspections for compliance with United States Department of Transportation guidelines. These sales represent a single performance obligation with revenue recognition occurring at the time services are invoiced.

 

6

 

(

“

”

The Company records inventory at the lower of cost or market, and uses a First In, First Out (“FIFO”) accounting valuation methodology and establishes an inventory valuation allowance for vehicles that it does not intend to support in the future. The Company had finished goods inventory on hand of 

as of September 30, 2021 and recorded an inventory valuation allowance of 

related to three vehicles that the Company does not intend to support in the future as of September 30, 2021, resulting in a net inventory balance of $1,019,453 as of September 30, 2021. The Company had no finished goods inventory on hand and no related inventory valuation allowance as of December 31, 2020. 

EVTDS previously recorded deferred tax benefits from net operating losses in current and prior periods. The Company, in light of the uncertainty of generating future taxable income against which those losses can be offset in order to realize such benefits, has determined that recording a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized is appropriate. In making such determinations, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. As of September 30, 2020, EVTDS did not recognize a full valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets. In March 2021, the Company recognized a full valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets, and as a result, recorded income tax expense of $218,300 for the three months ended March 31, 2021 in order to establish the reserve. This amount is also an income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2021.

The December 31, 2020 audit report for EVTDS stated that corporate income tax returns for 2017, 2018, and 2019 had not been filed; in fact, they were filed on December 15, 2020. The audit report also stated that corporate income tax returns for 2020 had not been filed; those returns were not due to be filed until May17, 2021, and they were filed in early May, 2021.

 

7

The Company has credit risks related to cash and cash equivalents on deposit with a federally insured bank, as at times it exceeds the $250,000 maximum amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Additionally, the Company maintains cash and short-term securities invested at Morgan Stanley Private Bank, National Association (“Morgan Stanley”). Between FDIC and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SPIC”) coverage, funds up to $750,000, which may include cash up to $500,000, are insured. In addition, Morgan Stanley provides excess insurance acquired by them from SPIC for an additional $1.9 million in cash and unlimited per customer securities up to a $1 billion cap.

The restricted cash reported by EVTDS as of December 31, 2020, combined with additional cash raised in 2021, was used to fund both the merger closing requirement of $5,000,000 to ADOMANI, Inc. (see Note 3) and to repay liabilities of EVTDS. The amount of restricted cash and corresponding unpaid current liabilities of EVTDS that is included in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2021 is zero, as the $254,913 $60,000.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021, total EVTDS sales were to one customer, ADOMANI, Inc., prior to the merger closing (see Note 3). The customer account was collected within two days of invoicing. In addition, the merged entity recorded additional sales during the two weeks post-merger which were made to two other customers and were collected within weeks of invoicing. The Company sold two vehicles during the last week of the three months ended June 30, 2021, and sold  additional vehicles in the latter part of September, 2021, many of them to

the Company’s

 FARs. expect to be paid for them in full; to the extent the invoices are outstanding for more than 30 days, the F are charged flooring interest on the sale price. Accordingly, customer accounts are reported at the invoiced amount outstanding

—Goodwill represents the excess acquisition cost over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is subject to annual impairment testing on or between annual tests if an event or change in circumstance occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. In testing for goodwill impairment, the Company has the option lo first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances lead to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the impairment test is not required. If the Company concludes otherwise, the Company is required to perform the impairment test. The goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its respective carrying value. If the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying value, goodwill at the reporting unit level is not impaired. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, further analysis is necessary to determine the amount of impairment, if any, by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill.

 

8

—Costs incurred in connection with the development of new products and manufacturing methods are charged to operating expenses as incurred. No research and development costs were incurred for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2021 or 2020.

—The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional capital over the period during which services are rendered. Additionally, in June 2018 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) which simplified several aspects of accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of ASC Topic 718. The guidance is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company implemented this change beginning in 2019. Because all outstanding unvested employee stock options became fully vested upon the merger close and change in control (see Notes 3 and 8), and because no new options to purchase shares of common stock were granted between March 16, 2021 and June 30, 2021, no stock-based compensation expense was recorded in the consolidated financial statements for the three or six months ended June 30, 2021. However, with respect to the options to purchase 440,000 shares of common stock issued on August 4, 2021 (see Note 8), stock-based compensation expense of $121,132 was recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021.

— Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Company provides for depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years, except leasehold improvements, which are being amortized over the life of the lease term. Property and equipment qualify for capitalization if the purchase price exceeds $2,000. Major repairs and replacements, which extend the useful lives of equipment, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the property. All other maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

—The Company accounts for leases as required by ASC Topic 842. The guidance requires companies to recognize leased assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and to disclose key information regarding leasing arrangements.

— Management has considered all recent accounting pronouncements issued, but not effective, and does not believe that they will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On March 15, 2021, the Company completed its acquisition of EVTDS, a supplier of trucks, cargo vans, chassis and other commercial vehicles. The transaction was completed in accordance with the Merger Agreement, by and among the Company, EVTDS and Merger Sub. As a result of such transaction, Merger Sub was merged with and into EVTDS, with EVTDS surviving as wholly owned subsidiary (the “Merger”). In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger, each outstanding share of the common stock of EVTDS was automatically converted into the right to receive one share of the common stock of the Company. As a result of the Merger, the Company issued an aggregate of 142,558,001 shares of its common stock to the former EVTDS stockholders, which shares represented approximately 56% of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company as of immediately following the effective time of the Merger. This exchange of shares and the resulting controlling ownership of EVTDS constitutes a reverse acquisition resulting in a recapitalization of EVTDS and purchase accounting being applied to ADOMANI, Inc. under ASC 805 due to EVTDS being the accounting acquirer and ADOMANI, Inc. being deemed an acquired business. This requires financial reporting from the Merger close date forward to reflect only the historic consolidated results of EVTDS and to include the consolidated results for Envirotech Vehicles, Inc. and subsidiaries from March 16, 2021 forward.

EVTDS entered into an exclusive distribution agreement as of October 4, 2017 to become the sole USA distributor of . This agreement grants EVTDS the exclusive right in the United States to promote sales, including the right to use trademarks, trade names, service marks and logos and to obtain orders based on sales targets for orders. The agreement also provides that  may not independently appoint additional distributors. The Company obtained this agreement in the Merger.

This preliminary allocation is based on management’s estimated fair value of the ADOMANI Inc. assets and liabilities at March 15, 2021 and is subject to adjustment when a third party valuation to determine the fair value of the assets for ASC 805, Business Combinations reporting purposes is received. That report is not yet completed as of the date of filing this Quarterly Report on Form for the quarterly period ended  30, 2021. Accordingly, there have been no adjustments made to the initial estimates of fair value. Adjustments made to the ADOMANI, Inc. assets are derived from a total value of $53,509,622, based on 112,675,558 shares of common stock outstanding on March 15, 2021 and the closing price that day of $0.4749 per share. From that amount, total assets acquired of $5,570,628 (including a reduction in the carrying value of finished goods inventory of $26,400 to reflect fair value) was deducted, and total acquired liabilities of $1,607,916 were added back to arrive at the $49,546,910 of Goodwill recorded. The Company incurred approximately $415,472 in transaction costs related to the Merger.

Effective May 2, 2018, ADOMANI, Inc. secured a line of credit from Morgan Stanley. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.0%. There is no maturity date for the line, but Morgan Stanley may at any time, in its sole discretion and without cause, demand the Company immediately repay any and all outstanding obligations under the line of credit in whole or in part. The line is secured by the cash and cash equivalents maintained by the Company in its Morgan Stanley accounts. Borrowings under the line may not exceed % of such cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities balances. The maximum amount the Company could borrow at September 30, 2021, was approximately $15.6 million; there was no principal amount outstanding at that date. The line of credit and related interest expense was repaid in full on February 3, 2020. The line of credit is still available to the Company, but there is no current plan to borrow from it.

On March 15, 2021, in connection with the closing of the Merger, the Company issued 142,558,001 shares of its common stock to the former stockholders of EVTDS in exchange for their shares of EVTDS (see Note 3), increasing the total number of outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to 255,233,559 as of immediately following the closing of the Merger.

On December 24, 2020, ADOMANI, Inc. entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional and accredited investors, whereby the Company agreed to sell, and the investors agreed to purchase, shares of common stock of the Company, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Financing”).

The first closing of the Financing occurred on December 29, 2020. ADOMANI, Inc. raised net cash proceeds, net of offering costs, of approximately $5.3 million through the sale and issuance of 11,500,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.50 per share and Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 8,625,001 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.50  650,000 shares and 487,500  $325,000

S-3

No. 333-255341)

of the Merger closing (see Note 3), as of March 31, 2021, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 10,681,327 shares of common stock, 2,056,326 of which were exercisable. The warrants were previously issued by ADOMANI, Inc. and assumed in the Merger. In connection with the second closing of the Financing discussed in Note 6, the Company issued additional warrants to purchase up to 19,166,667 shares of its common stock, all of which were exercisable as of September 30, 2021. The Company’s outstanding warrants as of September 30, 2021 is summarized as follows, and all were exercisable at that date (see Note 6):

 

13-month

.

As of September 30, 2021, the outstanding warrants have no intrinsic value.

 

13

As a result of the Merger closing (see Notes 2 and 3) there were 12,992,857 fully vested stock options outstanding at March 30, 2021 that were previously issued by ADOMANI, Inc. and assumed in the Merger. The outstanding options at September 30, 2021 consisted of the following:

 

On June 14, 2021, options to purchase 33,571 shares of common stock were exercised at a price of $0.12 per share, resulting in a payment to the Company of $4,029. Also on June 14, 2021, options to purchase an aggregate of 67,144 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.12 per share, options to purchase 75,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.45 per share, and options to purchase 60,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.31 per share were forfeited by the former holder thereof, as they were not exercised prior to the expiration date specified with respect to such options.

On June 25, 2021, options to purchase 358,571 shares of common stock were exercised by an officer of the Company at a price of $0.12 per share, resulting in a payment to the company of $43,029.

On July 23, 2021, options to purchase 358,571 shares of common stock were exercised by a former officer of the Company at a price of $0.12 per share, resulting in a payment to the company of $43,029. On July 29, 2021, options to purchase an aggregate of 135,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.45 per share and options to purchase 135,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.31 per share were forfeited by the same former officer of the Company as they were not exercised prior to the 90th day following his resignation of employment.

On August 4, 2021, the Company’s Compensation Committee granted Phillip W. Oldridge, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and a member of its board of directors, options to purchase 440,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2753 per share. The Committee determined that Mr. Oldridge would be immediately vested in the options granted. The options were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, resulting in fair market value of $121,132 for the options which expire on August 3, 2031 . The assumptions used in the valuation of the options included an expected term of ten years, volatility of 172.40%, and a risk-free interest rate of 1.56%. Because these options were fully vested and exercisable as of the grant date, the fair market value of $121,132 was recorded as stock based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2021.

As of September 30, 2021, outstanding options have an intrinsic value of $2,356,000.

 

14

under separate agreements between the Company and SRI, including the SRI Equipment Leases and the SRI Office Leases further described in the following paragraphs in this Note 9, as well as Notes 10, 12 and 13. The term of the SRI Services Agreement will continue for a period of three months unless earlier terminated by the parties in accordance therewith, and it is contemplated that an aggregate of $26,042 will be paid by the Company to SRI in consideration of the services rendered under the SRI Services Agreement. Phillip W. Oldridge, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and a member of its board of directors, serves as an executive officer and a member of the board of directors of SRI.

The Company has entered into lease agreements with SRI (the “SRI Equipment Leases”), pursuant to which the Company leases equipment used in connection with the operation of its business. The SRI Equipment Leases provide for the leasing of two vehicles that commenced on January 1, 2020 and the combined rent under such leases is $3,880 per month, and a separate SRI Equipment Lease provides for a trailer lease that commenced on December 1, 2019, under which the rent is $3,891 per month. The total monthly payment obligations of the Company under the SRI Equipment Leases is $7,771.

pick-up

The Company has entered into a commercial lease agreement (the “ABCI Office Lease”) with Alpha Bravo Charlie, Inc. (“ABCI”) that commenced on April 1, 2020, for the lease of office space in Porterville, California. The monthly rent for this facility is $2,800. See Notes 10, 12 and 13. Phillip W. Oldridge, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and a member of its board of directors, is a director of ABCI.

During the three months ended June 30, 2021, the Company purchased two used automobiles from Mr. Oldridge for an aggregate purchase price of $33,250. The Company purchased such vehicles from Mr. Oldridge for use by the Company’s employees for sales calls and other business purposes and are housed at the Company’s Corona, California, corporate offices.

In connection with the closing of the Merger in March 2021, the Company purchased two electric trucks from Mr. Oldridge for an aggregate purchase price of $128,000. The purchase price for such vehicles was paid in full to Mr. Oldridge during the three months ended June 30, 2021.

Prior to the closing of the Merger, Mr. Oldridge had permitted the vehicles to be used by the Company as customer demonstration vehicles for no cost. The purchase price of $64,000 per vehicle was less than the purchase price of $83,000 per vehicle that ADOMANI, Inc. had paid to EVTDS for similar vehicles in prior transactions. One of the vehicles purchased by the Company was subsequently sold to a customer of the Company in March 2021 and the second truck remains in the Company’s inventory at September 30, 2021.

The Company has entered into the SRI Equipment Leases (see Note 9). Rent expense under the SRI Equipment Leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $38,853 and $66,055, respectively, and was $23,312 and $75,935 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively.

The Company has entered into the SRI Office Lease (see Note 9). Rent expense under the SRI Office Lease for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $4,550 and $11,270, respectively, and was $2,730 and $8,190 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively.

The Company has entered into the ABCI Office Lease (see Note 9). Rent expense under the ABCI Office Lease for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $8,400 and $25,200, respectively, and was $8,400 and $16,800 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively.

 

15

space

30-days’

non-cancellable

 

by its conclusion had ADOMANI, Inc. remained a tenant. In November 2020, ADOMANI, Inc. vacated this space following staff reductions and moved remaining staff into the space discussed in the following paragraph. The Company ceased paying the rent on this facility after October 2020, but the expense was accrued. Two of the four suites covered by this lease were by the building management in March and April 2021, ending the Company’s obligation on those two suites. In June 2021, the landlord advised the Company that the remaining two suites were with a commencement date of September 1, 2021. On July 2, 2021, a resolution was reached with the landlord, whereby the parties mutually agreed to terminate the lease as of July 31, 2021 and the Company would be released from all obligations under the lease, in consideration of the Company’s agreement to pay the landlord an amount equal to

In December 2019, ADOMANI, Inc. signed a lease for combined office space and warehouse location in Corona, California. The facility had been used to conduct research and development activity, stage materials, assemble and/or manufacture vehicles, perform inspections, test demo vehicles, and securely store vehicles, equipment, parts and finished goods vehicle inventories prior to November 2020 when ADOMANI, Inc. vacated its former corporate office space in Corona, California, and made such facility the new corporate office location in addition to its prior use. The lease is for a period of

 

months, commencing on

, and terminating on

. The base rent for the term of the lease was $

, with $

due per month for fire sprinkler alarm monitoring and landscape maintenance. The base rent amount due monthly was $

at commencement and will escalate to $

by its conclusion.

On February 4, 2020, ADOMANI, Inc. signed a sublease agreement with Masters Transportation, Inc. (“Masters”) for Masters to occupy a portion of the Corona, California, facility that the Company occupied effective January 1, 2020 (see above). The effective date of the Masters’ sublease was February 1, 2020, and it expires when the Company’s lease on the Corona, California facility expires on December 31, 2022. Under the sublease, Masters is obligated to pay the Company monthly rent payments in an amount equal to $6,000 at commencement and thereafter escalating to $6,365 by its conclusion.

The Company’s total net rent expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 was ($14,841) and $198,161, respectively. The reduced expense for the three months ended September 30, 2021 was due to adjustments recorded in the quarter related to rent expense accrued during the six months ended June 30, 2021. The total expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $38,579 and $116,682, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Michael Menerey, its Chief Financial Officer. The term of the employment agreement was five years and the agreement provides for an initial annual base salary of $200,000. Effective January 1, 2020, Mr. Menerey’s annual base salary was increased to $215,000. On November 1, 2020, Mr. Menerey agreed to reduce his compensation to $150,000 indefinitely.

 

16

The following table summarizes the Company’s future minimum payments under contractual commitments, excluding debt, as of September 30, 2021:

 

On December 17, 2019, GreenPower Motor Company Inc., a public company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia (“GreenPower”), of which Phillip W. Oldridge, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors, previously served as a senior officer and a member of its board of directors, filed a notice of civil claim, captioned GreenPower Motor Company Inc. v. Phillip Oldridge et al., Action No. in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, against Mr. Oldridge, his trust, Envirotech Drive Systems Incorporated, a Wyoming corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of EVTDS that upon the closing of the Merger became our indirect wholly owned subsidiary (“EVTDS Wyoming”), and certain other companies . The notice of civil claim alleges that Mr. Oldridge breached certain fiduciary duties owed to GreenPower by working with certain parties in direct competition with and at the expense of GreenPower. GreenPower alleges that EVTDS Wyoming conspired with Mr. Oldridge to build its business, competing products and unfairly compete with Greenpower. GreenPower seeks general damages, special damages and punitive damages, plus interest and costs against EVTDS Wyoming. On February 2, 2020, EVTDS Wyoming and the other companies affiliated therewith named in the notice of civil claim filed a response to civil claim in which they denied certain of the allegations and asserted that certain other facts were outside of their knowledge. Fact discovery, through document disclosure and examinations for discoveries, in this matter remain ongoing. We believe that the lawsuit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend the action.

On August 23, 2018, a purported class action lawsuit captioned M.D. Ariful Mollik v. ADOMANI, Inc. et al., Case No. RIC 1817493, was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside against us, certain of our executive officers, Edward R. Monfort, the former Chief Technology Officer and a former director of ADOMANI, Inc., and the two underwriters of our offering of common stock under Regulation A in June 2017. This complaint alleges that documents related to our offering of common stock under Regulation A in June 2017 contained materially false and misleading statements and that all defendants violated Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and that we and the individual defendants violated Section 15 of the Securities Act, in connection therewith. The plaintiff seeks on behalf of himself and all class members: (i) certification of a class under California substantive law and procedure; (ii) compensatory damages and interest in an amount to be proven at trial; (iii) reasonable costs and expenses incurred in this action, including counsel fees and expert fees; (iv) awarding of rescission or rescissionary damages; and (v) equitable relief at the discretion of the ourt. Plaintiff’s counsel has subsequently filed a first amended complaint, a second amended complaint, a third amended complaint, and a fourth amended complaint. Plaintiff Mollik was replaced by putative class representatives Alan K. Brooks and Electric Drivetrains, LLC. Alan K. Brooks was subsequently dropped as a putative class representative. On October 27, 2020, we answered the fourth amended complaint, generally denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. On November 5, 2019, Network 1 and Boustead Securities (together the “Underwriters”) filed a cross-complaint against the Company seeking indemnification under the terms of the underwriting agreement the Company and the Underwriters entered for the Company’s initial public offering (the “Underwriting Agreement”). On December 10, 2019, the Company filed its answer to the Underwriters’ cross-complaint, generally denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. Also on this date, the Company filed a cross-complaint against the Underwriters seeking indemnification under the

 

17

terms of the Underwriting Agreement. On January 14, 2020, Mr. Monfort filed a cross-complaint against the Underwriters seeking indemnification under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. On January 15, 2020, Mr. Monfort filed a cross-complaint against the Company seeking indemnification under the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws and Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. On February 18, 2020, we filed an answer to Mr. Monfort’s cross-complaint, generally denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses.

plus interest and attorney’s fees. On September 20, 2019, Mr. Brooks filed his first amended complaint (“FAC”) reasserting his breach of contract claim and alleging five additional claims for (i) violations of Cal. Corp. Code Section 25401, (ii) fraud, (iii) negligent misrepresentation, (iv) elder abuse, and (v) unfair competition. We answered the FAC on November 12, 2019, generally denying the allegations in the FAC and asserting affirmative defenses. Fact discovery in this matter remains ongoing. On August 10, 2021, we filed a motion for summary judgement and dismissal of plaintiff’s FAC. The hearing on the motion for summary judgement as well as the trial setting conference is set for November 23, 2021. We believe that the lawsuit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend the action. 

On February 3, 2020, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Ebus in a foreclosure sale through a credit bid in the amount of $582,000, representing the amount then owed by Ebus to the Company evidenced by a secured promissory note. Following the Company’s successful credit bid at the foreclosure sale, Ebus’s obligations under the note were extinguished and the Company was entitled to take possession of substantially all of the assets of Ebus. While the Company was able to take possession of some of the assets, Ebus prevented the Company from taking possession of all of the assets purchased at the foreclosure sale. As a result, on April 13, 2020, the Company filed a complaint captioned ADOMANI, Inc. v. Ebus, Inc., et al., in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. 20ST CV 14275, against Ebus and certain of its insiders and affiliates seeking to recover the remainder of the assets and related damages. On January 14, 2021, a cross-complaint was filed against the Company by Ebus, Inc. and Anders B. Eklov for Unjust Enrichment and Conversion of Domain Name, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Company intends to pursue its claims set forth in the complaint and defend the claims set forth in the cross-complaint.

 

18

non-current

Non-current

non-current

Quantitative information regarding the Company’s leases is as follows:

 

19

zero-emission

10-Q,

10-Q

We believe that the growth and future success of our business depend on various opportunities, challenges and other factors, including the following:

COVID-19

zero-emission

zero-emission-electric

 

20

zero-emission

zero-emission

zero-emission

all-electric

all-electric

zero-emission

zero-emission

zero-emission

zero-emission

Cost of sales includes those costs related to the development, manufacture, and distribution of our products. Specifically, we include in cost of sales each of the following: material costs (including commodity costs); freight costs; labor and other costs related to the development and manufacture of our products; and other associated costs. Cost of sales also includes costs related to the valuation of inventory due to impairment, obsolescence, or shrinkage.

 

21

Selling, general and administrative expenses include all corporate and administrative functions that support our company, including personnel-related expense and stock-based compensation costs; costs related to investor relations activities; warranty costs, including product recall and customer satisfaction program costs; consulting costs; marketing-related expenses; and other expenses that cannot be included in cost of sales.

These expenses are related to our consulting and research and development activity.

non-operating

We account for income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under FASB ASC 740, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that we will not realize tax assets through future operations. Because we have incurred only losses to this point, no provision for income taxes has been made in 2021, and the income tax benefit recorded in 2020 has been reversed and effectively reserved as well.

The following discussion compares operating data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 to the corresponding periods ended September 30, 2020:

Sales were $709,092 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $1,368,151 and $88,735 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2021 consisted of two cargo vans and four cab & chassis trucks sold to certain factory authorized representatives; one van sold to a business owner in New Jersey who utilized a voucher from the NJ Zip program; and one upfitted truck sold to a new business in the San Francisco Bay area. Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 consisted of the items sold in the third quarter plus four cargo vans sold to ADOMANI, Inc. prior to the closing of the Merger, a box truck sold to the Pittsburg, California Unified School District, a complete cargo van and a cab and chassis truck sold to two different factory authorized representatives in June 2021, and maintenance and inspection services provided.

Cost of sales were $469,611 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $930,977 and $73,560 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Cost of sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 consisted of the costs related to the sale of the vehicles sold as described above and the costs of providing maintenance and inspection services.

 

22

non-cash

non-cash

non-cash

non-cash

Consulting expenses were $36,735 and $16,800 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and were $142,092 and $54,101 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increases in the current year periods were due primarily to payments to temporary professional firms to support operations and accounting activities of the Company due to vacant internal staff positions.

10-Q,

As of September 30, 2021, we had cash and cash equivalents of $10,640,486 and marketable securities of $7,007,000, a combined total of $17,647,486. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our operations during the next eighteen months and beyond. However, we may not successfully execute our business plan, and if we do not, we may need additional capital to continue our operations and support the increased working capital requirements associated with the fulfillment of purchase orders. In addition, to the extent we are successful in establishing a U.S. manufacturing facility, additional debt and/or equity capital may be required in order to purchase related equipment and set up production lines.

On December 24, 2020, ADOMANI, Inc. entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional and accredited investors, whereby the Company agreed to sell, and the investors agreed to purchase, shares of common stock of the Company, and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Financing”).

The first closing of the Financing occurred on December 29, 2020. ADOMANI, Inc. raised cash proceeds, net of offering costs, of approximately $5.3 million through the sale and issuance of 11,500,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.50 per share and Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 8,625,001 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The share and Warrant amounts issued include 650,000 shares and a Warrant to

purchase

487,500 shares issued to the underwriter in lieu of paying $325,000 of fees in cash.

 

23

The second closing of the Financing was completed on May 7, 2021. The Company raised cash proceeds, net of offering costs, of approximately $16.3 million through the sale and issuance of 38,333,333 shares of common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.45 per share and Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 19,166,667 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The share and Warrant amounts issued include 2,166,666 shares and a Warrant to purchase 1,083,330 shares issued to the underwriter in lieu of paying $975,000 of fees in cash.

Because all outstanding unvested options to purchase ADOMANI, Inc.’s common stock became fully vested upon the closing of the Merger, the Company had 12,398,571 fully vested options outstanding as of June 30,2021. On July 23, 2021, options to purchase 358,571 shares of common stock were exercised by a former officer of the Company. On July 29, 2021, options to purchase an aggregate of 270,000 shares of common stock were forfeited by the same former officer of the Company.

On August 4, 2021, the Company’s Compensation Committee granted Phillip W. Oldridge, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and a member of its board of directors, options to purchase 440,000 shares of common stock. The Committee determined that Mr. Oldridge would be immediately vested in the options granted.

As a result of the activity described above during the three months ended September 30, 2021, the number of fully vested options outstanding as of September 30, 2021 was 12,210,000. See Notes 2, 3 and 8 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

10-Q.

30-day

We do not have any contractual obligations for ongoing capital expenditures at this time. We do, however, purchase equipment necessary to conduct our operations on an as needed basis.

 

24

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:

 

non-cash

non-cash

We expect cash used in operating activities to fluctuate significantly in future periods as a result of a number of factors, some of which are outside of our control, including, among others: the success we achieve in generating revenue; the success we have in helping our customers obtain financing to subsidize their purchases of our products; our ability to efficiently develop our dealer and service network; the costs of batteries and other materials utilized to make our products; the extent to which we need to invest additional funds in research and development; and the amount of expense we incur to satisfy future warranty claims.

Net cash used by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $3,654,626 as compared to $30,166 used by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The $3,624,460 increase in net cash used by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 is due to the net $7.0 million purchase of marketable securities, reduced by the $3,373,332 of cash acquired in the Merger and reduced by the capital expenditures decrease of $2,208.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $22,282,308 as compared to $199,990 provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, an increase of $22,082,318. Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 consisted of $6,415,110 proceeds from the issuance of common stock by EVTDS, and $16,365,078 proceeds from the issuance of common stock by the Company, of which $16,275,001 related to the second closing of the Financing discussed above and the remaining $90,077 was received from the exercise of stock options in June and July of 2021. The net Financing proceeds of $16,275,001 were reduced by offering costs of $188,015 and were further reduced by both EVTDS and ADOMANI, Inc. repaying their SBA EIDL loans and accrued interest in the amounts of $152,835 and $157,030, respectively.

 

25

8-K/A

10-K

10-K/A,

Sheet Arrangements

off-balance

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to us, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Our management, in consultation with our legal counsel as appropriate, assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, we, in consultation with our legal counsel, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims, as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in our financial statements. If the assessment indicates a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable, but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

10-Q.

The carrying values of our financial instruments, including cash, notes receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement” defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, and which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

26

Other than those items required to be addressed due to the purchase accounting requirements of the reverse acquisition, we do not have any assets or liabilities that are required to be measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for emerging growth companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards, and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. We have chosen to rely on the other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, as an emerging growth company we are not required to, among other things, (i) being permitted to provide only two years of audited financial statements, in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements, with correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure, (ii) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, (iii) not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements, (iv) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation or (v) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

non-convertible

 

27

We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. We do not currently face material market risks such as interest rate fluctuation risk and foreign currency exchange risk. Our cash and cash equivalents include cash in readily available checking and money market accounts. These investments are not dependent on interest rate fluctuations that may cause the principal amount of these investments to fluctuate, and we do not expect such fluctuation will have a material impact on our financial conditions. If we issue additional debt in the future, we will be subject to interest rate risk. The majority of our expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar.

We may face risks associated with the costs of raw materials, primarily batteries, as we go into production. To the extent these and other risks materialize, they could have a material effect on our operating results or financial condition. We currently anticipate that our international selling, marketing and administrative costs related to foreign sales, if any, will be largely denominated in United States dollars, which may create foreign currency exchange risk exposure.

13a-15(e)

15d-15(e)

Due to the staff reductions and voluntary resignations we experienced beginning in the fourth quarter of 2020 and continuing through the closing of the Merger in March 2021, we increased our reliance on outsourced accounting help during such periods and for all periods thereafter through the date of this filing. As a result of such changes, we have been unable to maintain the levels of segregation of duties during such periods at the levels of prior periods, and such changes to our disclosure controls and procedures have significantly affected our internal control over financial reporting during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021. We have yet to fully resolve such deficiencies as of the date of this filing. We have engaged, and continue to seek additional, experienced accounting professionals with relevant expertise to provide additional accounting services intended to supplement our efforts and mitigate the negative effects of such recent changes to our disclosure controls and procedures.

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. Similarly, an evaluation of controls cannot provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

 

28

Except as set forth below, we know of no material, existing or pending, legal proceedings against our Company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

S-1914285,

On or about July 18, 2021, Greenpower and GP Greenpower Industries Inc. filed a counterclaim against Phillip W. Oldridge, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors, David Oldridge, our Chief Technology Officer and the brother of Phillip W. Oldridge, EVTDS Wyoming and other companies in Supreme Court of British Columbia Action No. S207532. The counterclaim alleges that David Oldridge, Phillip Oldridge, EVTDS Wyoming and other companies committed the tort of abuse of process by causing 42 Design Works Inc. to commence a lawsuit against Greenpower and GP Greenpower Industries Inc. Additionally, Greenpower and GP Greenpower Industries Inc. claim against David Oldridge, Phillip W. Oldridge, EVTDS Wyoming and the other companies for conspiracy. EVTDS Wyoming, David Oldridge and the other companies have filed an application to strike the allegations in the counterclaim regarding abuse of process and conspiracy. The court application is scheduled to be heard on November 12, 2021.

On August 23, 2018, a purported class action lawsuit captioned M.D. Ariful Mollik v. ADOMANI, Inc. et al., Case No. RIC 1817493, was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside against us, certain of our executive officers, Edward R. Monfort, the former Chief Technology Officer and a former director of ADOMANI, Inc. and the two underwriters of our offering of common stock under Regulation A in June 2017. This complaint alleges that documents related to our offering of common stock under Regulation A in June 2017 contained materially false and misleading statements and that all defendants violated Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and that we and the individual defendants violated Section 15 of the Securities Act, in connection therewith. The plaintiff seeks on behalf of himself and all class members: (i) certification of a class under California substantive law and procedure; (ii) compensatory damages and interest in an amount to be proven at trial; (iii) reasonable costs and expenses incurred in this action, including counsel fees and expert fees; (iv) awarding of rescission or rescissionary damages; and (v) equitable relief at the discretion of the court. Plaintiff’s counsel has subsequently filed a first amended complaint, a second amended complaint, a third amended complaint, and a fourth amended complaint. Plaintiff Mollik was replaced by putative class representatives Alan K. Brooks and Electric Drivetrains, LLC. Alan K. Brooks was subsequently dropped as a putative class representative. On October 27, 2020, we answered the fourth amended complaint, generally denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. On November 5, 2019, Network 1 and Boustead Securities (together the “Underwriters”) filed a cross-complaint against the Company seeking indemnification under the terms of the underwriting agreement the Company and the Underwriters entered for the Company’s initial public offering (the “Underwriting Agreement”). On December 10, 2019, the Company filed its answer to the Underwriters’ cross-complaint, generally denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses. Also on this date, the Company filed a cross-complaint against the Underwriters seeking indemnification under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. On January 14, 2020, Mr. Monfort filed a cross-complaint against the Underwriters seeking indemnification under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. On January 15, 2020, Mr.

 

29

Monfort filed a cross-complaint against the Company seeking indemnification under the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws and Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. On February 18, 2020, we filed an answer to Mr. Monfort’s cross-complaint, generally denying the allegations and asserting affirmative defenses.

On March 2, 2021, Electric Drivetrains filed its motion for class certification. On March 17, 2021, the court held a case management conference. At the case management conference, the court set a tentative schedule for class discovery and briefing on the motion for class certification. On June 2, 2021, Electric Drivetrains and ADOMANI filed a stipulation extending the deadline for class certification discovery proposing the following deadlines: close of class discovery on September 28, 2021; defendants’ opposition to the motion for class certification due on October 28, 2021; plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion due on November 29, 2021; a case management conference on December 13, 2021 to set a date for hearing on the merits of the motion for class certification. Electric Drivetrains settled its claims against Mr. Monfort. The Underwriters have reached settlements with Electric Drivetrains on the primary claims in this matter. All defendants are maintaining their cross claims against each other. On July 13, 2021, Electric Drivetrains’ counsel moved to be relieved as counsel and on August 23, 2021, the court granted this motion. Also on August 23, 2021, the Clerk of Court issued an order to show cause why the complaint should not be stricken and matter dismissed for failure to retain new counsel to Electric Drivetrains. On October 28, 2021, Electric Drivetrains filed a substitution of attorney, substituting J. Ryan Gustafson of Good Gustafson Aumais LLP as its new counsel. A case management conference and hearing on the order to show cause are set for December 13, 2021. We believe that the purported class action lawsuit is without merit and intend to vigorously defend the action.

On February 3, 2020, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Ebus in a foreclosure sale through a credit bid in the amount of $582,000, representing the amount then owed by Ebus to the Company evidenced by a secured promissory note. Following the Company’s successful credit bid at the foreclosure sale, Ebus’s obligations under the note were extinguished and the Company was entitled to take possession of substantially all of the assets of Ebus. While the Company was able to take possession of some of the assets, Ebus prevented the Company from taking possession of all of the assets purchased at the foreclosure sale. As a result, on April 13, 2020, the Company filed a complaint captioned ADOMANI, Inc. v. Ebus, Inc., et al., in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. 20ST CV 14275, against Ebus and certain of its insiders and affiliates seeking to recover the remainder of the assets and related damages. On January 14, 2021, a cross-complaint was filed against the Company by Ebus, Inc. and Anders B. Eklov for Unjust Enrichment and Conversion of Domain Name, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Company intends to pursue its claims set forth in the complaint and defend the claims set forth in the cross-complaint.

 

30

8-K/A

10-K

10-K/A,

None.

None.

Not applicable.

None.

 

31

10-Q

 

 

 

 

32

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

33