ESCALON MEDICAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2007 December (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
Mark One
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission File Number: 0-20127
Escalon Medical Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
33-0272839 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
565 East Swedesford Road, Suite 200 Wayne, PA (Address of principal executive offices) |
19087 (Zip code) |
(610) 688-6830
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date: 6,389,315 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as
of February 8, 2008.
Escalon Medical Corp.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
1
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Statements
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
ESCALON MEDICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
December 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2007 | 2007 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7,527,023 | $ | 8,879,462 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
4,636,152 | 4,653,073 | ||||||
Inventory, net |
7,621,515 | 7,761,370 | ||||||
Other current assets |
278,947 | 469,107 | ||||||
Total current assets |
20,063,637 | 21,763,012 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment, net |
946,202 | 873,191 | ||||||
Goodwill |
21,072,260 | 21,072,260 | ||||||
Trademarks and trade names, net |
620,106 | 620,106 | ||||||
Patents, net |
183,544 | 216,228 | ||||||
Covenant not to compete and customer list, net |
278,536 | 326,860 | ||||||
Other assets |
127,839 | 145,556 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 43,292,124 | $ | 45,017,213 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 54,552 | $ | 150,200 | ||||
Accounts payable |
1,979,115 | 1,626,274 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
2,098,245 | 2,748,133 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,131,912 | 4,524,607 | ||||||
Accrued post-retirement benefits |
1,087,000 | 1,087,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,218,912 | 5,611,607 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 35,000,000 share authorized; 6,389,315 and
6,386,857 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007, respectively |
6,390 | 6,387 | ||||||
Common stock warrants |
1,601,346 | 1,601,346 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
66,225,396 | 66,045,050 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
(29,675,961 | ) | (28,207,824 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) |
(83,959 | ) | (39,353 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
38,073,212 | 39,405,606 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 43,292,124 | $ | 45,017,213 | ||||
2
Table of Contents
ESCALON MEDICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended December 31, | Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 7,449,626 | $ | 7,033,860 | $ | 14,282,976 | 13,577,446 | |||||||||
Other revenue |
45,454 | 602,880 | 105,375 | 1,227,454 | ||||||||||||
Revenues, net |
7,495,080 | 7,636,740 | 14,388,351 | 14,804,900 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
3,951,607 | 3,878,214 | 7,874,193 | 7,508,594 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
876,750 | 1,080,950 | 1,800,111 | 1,794,555 | ||||||||||||
Marketing, general and administrative |
3,372,353 | 3,144,611 | 6,312,261 | 6,700,511 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
8,200,710 | 8,103,775 | 15,986,565 | 16,003,660 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(705,630 | ) | (467,035 | ) | (1,598,214 | ) | (1,198,760 | ) | ||||||||
Other (expense) and income: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity in Ocular Telehealth Management, LLC |
(16,611 | ) | (12,155 | ) | (50,722 | ) | (30,698 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
85,391 | 13,498 | 187,088 | 58,934 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(2,496 | ) | (5,654 | ) | (6,289 | ) | (14,939 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income |
66,284 | (4,311 | ) | 130,077 | 13,297 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) before taxes |
(639,346 | ) | (471,346 | ) | (1,468,137 | ) | (1,185,463 | ) | ||||||||
Benefit from income taxes |
| (1,243 | ) | 0 | (1,243 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) |
$ | (639,346 | ) | $ | (470,103 | ) | $ | (1,468,137 | ) | $ | (1,184,220 | ) | ||||
Basic net (loss) per share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||
Diluted net (loss) per share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares basic |
6,389,315 | 6,347,972 | 6,388,701 | 6,346,315 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
6,389,315 | 6,347,972 | 6,388,701 | 6,346,315 | ||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Table of Contents
ESCALON MEDICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net (loss) |
$ | (1,468,137 | ) | $ | (1,184,220 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in)
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
296,328 | 282,082 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to stock options |
172,911 | 123,774 | ||||||
Loss on Ocular Telehealth Management, LLC |
50,722 | 30,698 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
16,921 | (644,752 | ) | |||||
Inventory, net |
139,855 | (1,149,054 | ) | |||||
Other current and long-term assets |
62,320 | 152,349 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities |
(297,047 | ) | 700,201 | |||||
Net cash (used in) operating activities |
(1,026,127 | ) | (1,688,921 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Investment in Ocular Telehealth Management, LLC |
(33,000 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of fixed assets |
(142,880 | ) | (61,329 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
(175,880 | ) | (61,329 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Principal payments on term loans |
(95,648 | ) | (108,457 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock stock options |
7,438 | 141,037 | ||||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
(88,210 | ) | 32,580 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(62,222 | ) | (92,899 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,352,439 | ) | (1,810,568 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
8,879,462 | 3,379,710 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 7,527,023 | $ | 1,569,142 | ||||
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 6,289 | $ | 14,939 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 0 | $ | (98,412 | ) | |||
Increase in unrealized appreciation on available for sale securities |
$ | 0 | $ | 8,910 | ||||
Reclassification of other current assets to fixed assets |
$ | 145,559 | $ | 0 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Table of Contents
ESCALON MEDICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Additional | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Stock | Paid-in | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Warrants | Capital | Deficit | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
6,386,857 | $ | 6,387 | $ | 1,601,346 | $ | 66,045,050 | $ | (28,207,824 | ) | $ | (39,353 | ) | $ | 39,405,606 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) |
0 | 0 | 0 | (1,468,137 | ) | 0 | (1,468,137 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
2,458 | 3 | 0 | 7,435 | 0 | 0 | 7,438 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
0 | 0 | 172,911 | 0 | 0 | 172,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (44,606 | ) | (44,606 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
6,389,315 | $ | 6,390 | $ | 1,601,346 | $ | 66,225,396 | $ | (29,675,961 | ) | $ | (83,959 | ) | $ | 38,073,212 | |||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
Table of Contents
ESCALON MEDICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended December 31, | Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) |
$ | (639,346 | ) | $ | (470,103 | ) | $ | (1,468,137 | ) | $ | (1,184,220 | ) | ||||
Change in unrealized gains on
available for sale securities |
0 | 0 | 0 | 8,910 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(48,731 | ) | (21,398 | ) | (44,606 | ) | $ | 104,836 | ||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) |
$ | (688,077 | ) | $ | (491,501 | ) | $ | (1,512,743 | ) | $ | (1,070,474 | ) | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
6
Table of Contents
Escalon Medical Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
Escalon Medical Corp. (Escalon or the Company) is a Pennsylvania corporation initially
incorporated in California in 1987, and reincorporated in Pennsylvania in November 2001. Within
this document, the Company collectively shall mean Escalon and its wholly owned subsidiaries:
Sonomed, Inc. (Sonomed), Escalon Vascular Access, Inc. (Vascular), Escalon Digital Vision,
Inc. (EMI), Escalon Holdings, Inc. (EHI), Escalon IP Holdings, Inc., Escalon Vascular IP
Holdings, Inc., Sonomed IP Holdings, Inc., Drew Scientific Holdings, Inc., and Drew Scientific
Group, Plc (Drew) and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
The Company operates in the healthcare market, specializing in the development, manufacture,
marketing and distribution of medical devices in the areas of ophthalmology, diabetes, hematology
and vascular access. The Company and its products are subject to regulation and inspection by the
United States Food and Drug Administration (the FDA) and other regulatory authorities. The FDA
requires extensive testing of new products prior to sale and has jurisdiction over the safety,
efficacy and manufacture of products, as well as product labeling and marketing.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and are presented
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys 2007 Annual Report
on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In the opinion of
management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which are
of a normal recurring nature) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results
of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.
2. Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123R (SFAS No.123R) (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payments. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123 and supersedes ABP Opinion No. 25, which
requires the Company to expense share-based payments, including employee stock options. With
limited exceptions, the amount of compensation costs will be measured based on the grant date fair
value of the equity or liability instrument issued. Compensation cost will be recognized over the
period that the optionee provides service in exchange for the award. Prior to fiscal 2007 the
Company was a small business issuer as defined in Item 10 of Regulation S-B. As a result, the
Company was required to adopt this standard in its fiscal year beginning July 1, 2006.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006 total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
share-based compensation arrangements under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan was $292,215 and
$152,920, respectively. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
four years. For the six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, $30,457 and $0 was recorded
as compensation expense, respectively.
Cash received from share option exercises under stock-based payment plans for the six months
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $7,438 and $42,625, respectively. The Company did not realize
any tax effect, which would be a reduction in its tax rate, on options due to the full valuation
allowances established on its deferred tax assets.
7
Table of Contents
The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based compensation under
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 96-18,
Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in
Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Service. The fair value of the option issued is used to
measure the transaction, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services received.
Fair value is measured as the value of the Companys common stock on the date that the commitment
for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterpartys performance is complete.
The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional
paid-in capital. For the three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
$141,454 and $123,772 was recorded as compensation expense, respectively.
3. Earnings Per Share
The Company follows Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128, Earnings Per
Share, in presenting basic and diluted earnings per share. The following table sets forth the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended December 31, | Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted
earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) |
$ | (639,346 | ) | $ | (470,103 | ) | $ | (1,468,137 | ) | $ | (1,184,220 | ) | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share weighted average shares |
6,389,315 | 6,347,972 | 6,388,701 | 6,346,315 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options and warrants |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings
per
share weighted average and
assumed conversion |
6,389,315 | 6,347,972 | 6,388,701 | 6,346,315 | ||||||||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
$ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | ||||
The impact of dilutive securities was omitted from the earnings per share calculation in all
periods presented as they would reduce the loss per share (anti-dilutive).
8
Table of Contents
4. Legal Proceedings
Institute of Child Health
Drew entered into a license agreement with the Institute of Child Health (ICH) on May 10,
1993 to use ICHs intellectual property to manufacture, lease, sell, use and sublicense certain
products and all related consumables used therein in the testing of blood and fluids. Under the
license agreement Drew was obligated to pay royalties to ICH on the products and consumables. On
January 23, 2006, the Company received a letter from ICH alleging that Drew had failed to remit
certain monies due under the license agreement and has sought an accounting to determine such
amount due.
The parties agreed to settle this matter in October 2007 for a payment by the Company to ICH
of $23,304.
Other Legal Proceedings
The Company, from time to time, is involved in various legal proceedings and disputes that
arise in the normal course of business. These matters have included intellectual property
disputes, contract disputes, employment disputes, and other matters. The Company does not believe
that the resolution of any of these matters has had or is likely to have a material adverse impact
on the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations.
9
Table of Contents
5. Segmental Information
During the three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Companys
operations were classified into five principal reportable business units that provide different
products or services.
Separate management of each segment is required because each business unit is subject to
different marketing, production and technology strategies.
Segmental Statements of Operations (in thousands) - Three months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew | Sonomed | Vascular | Medical/Trek/EHI | EMI | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 3,154 | $ | 2,717 | $ | 2,529 | $ | 2,732 | $ | 876 | $ | 796 | $ | 331 | $ | 379 | $ | 560 | $ | 411 | $ | 7,450 | $ | 7,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue |
$ | 45 | $ | 55 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 547 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 45 | $ | 602 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue, net |
3,199 | 2,772 | 2,529 | 2,732 | 876 | 796 | 331 | 926 | 560 | 411 | $ | 7,495 | $ | 7,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 1,942 | $ | 1,922 | $ | 1,209 | $ | 1,220 | $ | 351 | $ | 305 | $ | 212 | $ | 245 | $ | 237 | $ | 186 | $ | 3,951 | $ | 3,878 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research & Development |
590 | 875 | 176 | 84 | 44 | 36 | 0 | 2 | 67 | 83 | $ | 877 | $ | 1,080 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing, General & Admin |
1,283 | 1,277 | 895 | 762 | 425 | 412 | 629 | 582 | 140 | 113 | $ | 3,372 | $ | 3,146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
3,815 | 4,074 | 2,280 | 2,066 | 820 | 753 | 841 | 829 | 444 | 382 | 8,200 | $ | 8,104 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from
operations |
(616 | ) | (1,302 | ) | 249 | 666 | 56 | 43 | (510 | ) | 97 | 116 | 29 | (705 | ) | $ | (467 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (expense)
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in OTM |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 85 | $ | 14 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 85 | $ | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total other (expense) income |
(2 | ) | (6 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66 | $ | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before taxes |
(618 | ) | $ | (1,309 | ) | $ | 249 | $ | 666 | $ | 56 | $ | 43 | $ | (440 | ) | $ | 101 | $ | 116 | $ | 29 | (639 | ) | $ | (470 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (1 | ) | 0 | $ | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (618 | ) | $ | (1,309 | ) | $ | 249 | $ | 666 | $ | 56 | $ | 43 | $ | (440 | ) | $ | 102 | $ | 116 | $ | 29 | $ | (639 | ) | $ | (469 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 81 | $ | 56 | $ | 8 | $ | 5 | $ | 16 | $ | 11 | $ | 24 | $ | 23 | $ | 53 | $ | 28 | $ | 182 | $ | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 17,310 | $ | 17,325 | $ | 12,549 | $ | 14,099 | $ | 1,687 | $ | 4,034 | $ | 10,135 | $ | 1,590 | $ | 1,611 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 43,292 | $ | 38,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures for
long-lived assets |
$ | 10 | $ | 35 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 51 | $ | 0 | $ | 27 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 89 | $ | 35 |
10
Table of Contents
Segmental Statements of Operations (in thousands) Six months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew | Sonomed | Vascular | Medical/Trek/EHI | EMI | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 6,189 | $ | 5,502 | $ | 4,762 | $ | 5,025 | $ | 1,680 | $ | 1,613 | $ | 716 | $ | 744 | $ | 937 | $ | 694 | $ | 14,284 | $ | 13,578 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenue |
105 | 125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,102 | 0 | 0 | 105 | 1,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue, net |
6,294 | 5,627 | 4,762 | 5,025 | 1,680 | 1,613 | 716 | 1,846 | 937 | 694 | 14,389 | 14,805 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
3,844 | 3,681 | 2,466 | 2,407 | 634 | 618 | 466 | 499 | 464 | 304 | 7,874 | 7,509 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research & Development |
1,192 | 1,333 | 340 | 161 | 129 | 58 | 0 | 91 | 139 | 151 | 1,800 | 1,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing, General & Admin |
2,287 | 2,660 | 1,707 | 1,569 | 833 | 942 | 1,188 | 1,337 | 297 | 193 | 6,312 | 6,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
7,323 | 7,674 | 4,513 | 4,137 | 1,596 | 1,618 | 1,654 | 1,927 | 900 | 648 | 15,986 | 16,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from
operations |
(1,029 | ) | (2,047 | ) | 249 | 888 | 84 | (5 | ) | (938 | ) | (81 | ) | 37 | 46 | (1,597 | ) | (1,199 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (expense) and
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in OTM |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (51 | ) | (31 | ) | 0 | 0 | (51 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 187 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 187 | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(6 | ) | (15 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (6 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other (expense) income |
(6 | ) | (15 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 136 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before taxes |
(1,035 | ) | (2,062 | ) | 249 | 888 | 84 | (5 | ) | (802 | ) | (53 | ) | 37 | 46 | (1,467 | ) | (1,186 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (2 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (1,035 | ) | $ | (2,062 | ) | $ | 249 | $ | 888 | $ | 84 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (802 | ) | $ | (51 | ) | $ | 37 | $ | 46 | $ | (1,467 | ) | $ | (1,184 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 149 | $ | 142 | $ | 18 | $ | 11 | $ | 25 | $ | 36 | $ | 46 | $ | 41 | $ | 58 | $ | 52 | $ | 296 | $ | 282 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 17,310 | $ | 17,325 | $ | 12,549 | $ | 14,099 | $ | 1,687 | $ | 4,034 | $ | 10,135 | $ | 1,590 | $ | 1,611 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 43,292 | $ | 38,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures for
long-lived assets |
$ | 63 | $ | 59 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 52 | $ | 0 | $ | 27 | $ | 2 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 143 | $ | 61 |
6. Related-Party Transactions
The Company and a member of the Companys Board of Directors are founding and equal members of
Ocular Telehealth Management, LLC (OTM). OTM is a diagnostic telemedicine company providing
remote examination, diagnosis and management of disorders affecting the human eye. OTMs initial
focus is on the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by creating access and providing annual dilated
retinal examinations for the diabetic population. Through December 31, 2007, the Company has
invested $321,000 in OTM, including $33,000 invested during the six-month period ended December 31,
2007. As of December 31, 2007, the Company owned 45% of OTM. The Company provides administrative
support functions to OTM. From inception through December 31, 2007, OTM had revenue of
approximately $28,100 and incurred expenses of approximately $465,000.
7. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises
financial statements. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in the tax return. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on July 1,
2007. As of the date of adoption, the 2003-2006 tax years remain subject to examination by major
tax jurisdictions.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustments in
the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and, at the adoption date of July 1, 2007, the
Company had no unrecognized tax benefits that would affect its effective tax rate if recognized.
At December 31, 2007, the Company also had no unrecognized tax benefits. If uncertain tax
positions had been recorded, the Company would have recognized interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2007, no accrued interest
related to uncertain tax positions has been recorded.
11
Table of Contents
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosures on fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated
financial statements. However, the Company does not expect the effect to be significant.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No.
159 permits a company to choose to measure many financial instruments and other items at fair value
that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve
financial reporting by providing a company with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported
earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply
complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 will be effective for fiscal years that begin
after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS
No. 159 on its consolidated financial statements. However, the Company does not expect the effect
to be significant.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in, or incorporated by reference in, this report are
forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which provide current expectations or forecasts of future events.
Such statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as anticipate, believe,
could, estimate, expect, forecast, intend, may, plan, possible, project,
should, will, and similar words or expressions. The Companys forward-looking statements
include certain information relating to general business strategy, growth strategies, financial
results, liquidity, product development, the introduction of new products, the potential markets
and uses for the Companys products, the Companys regulatory filings with the FDA, acquisitions,
the development of joint venture opportunities, intellectual property and patent protection and
infringement, the loss of revenue due to the expiration or termination of certain agreements, the
effect of competition on the structure of the markets in which the Company competes and defending
the Company in litigation matters. The reader must carefully consider forward-looking statements
and understand that such statements involve a variety of risks and uncertainties, known and
unknown, and may be affected by assumptions that fail to materialize as anticipated. Consequently,
no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed, and actual results may vary materially. It is not
possible to foresee or identify all factors affecting the Companys forward-looking statements, and
the reader therefore should not consider the list of such factors
contained in this report and its annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007 to be an exhaustive statement of all risks,
uncertainties or potentially inaccurate assumptions.
Executive Overview Six-Month Period Ended December 31, 2007
The following highlights are discussed in further detail within this report. The reader is
encouraged to read this report in its entirety to gain a more complete understanding of factors
impacting Company performance and financial condition.
| Product revenue increased approximately 6% during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. The increase was primarily related to increases in the Drew and EMI business units. Product revenue at Drew and EMI increased 12% and 35%, respectively, during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 when compared to the same period last fiscal year. These increases were offset by weakened sales in the Companys Sonomed and Medical/Trek business units. Sales at Sonomed and Medical/Trek decreased approximately 5% and 4%, respectively, during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 compared to the same period last fiscal year. | ||
| Other revenue decreased approximately $1,122,000 or 91% during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. The decrease was attributable |
12
Table of Contents
to decreased royalties received from the IntraLase License Agreement as a result of the settlement agreement between the Company and IntraLase dated February 27, 2007. Under the settlement agreement, IntraLase made a lump-sum payment to the Company of $9,600,000 in exchange for which all pending litigation between the parties was dismissed, the parties exchanged general releases, the Companys ownership of all patents and intellectual property formerly licensed to IntraLase from the Company was obtained by IntraLase, and the license agreement has terminated. In addition, the payment from IntraLase satisfied all outstanding past, current and future royalties owed or alleged to be owed by IntraLase to the Company. | |||
| Cost of goods sold as a percentage of product revenue increased slightly to approximately 56% during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007, as compared to approximately 55% for the same period last fiscal year. Gross margins in the Drew business unit have historically been lower than those in the Companys other business units. The aggregate cost of goods sold as a percentage of product revenue of the Sonomed, Vascular, Medical/Trek and EMI business units during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 was approximately 49% in the current period as compared to 45% in the same period last fiscal year. | ||
| Operating expenses decreased approximately 5% during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The decrease was due to a significant decrease in legal fees related to the IntraLase litigation and to the Companys realizing the effect of the cost reduction plan implemented in the prior fiscal year. |
Company Overview
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with interim condensed consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto, which are set forth in Item 1 this report.
The Company operates in the healthcare market specializing in the development, manufacture,
marketing and distribution of medical devices and pharmaceuticals in the areas of ophthalmology,
diabetes, hematology and vascular access. The Company and its products are subject to regulation
and inspection by the FDA. The FDA requires extensive testing of new products prior to sale and
has jurisdiction over the safety, efficacy and manufacture of products, as well as product labeling
and marketing. The Companys Internet address is www.escalonmed.com.
In February 1996, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities
of Escalon Ophthalmics, Inc. (EOI), a developer and distributor of ophthalmic surgical products. Prior to this
acquisition, the Company devoted substantially all of its resources to the research and development
of ultra fast laser systems designed for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders. As a result of the
EOI acquisition, the Company changed its market focus and ceased developing laser technology. In
October 1997, the Company licensed its intellectual laser property to IntraLase, in return for an
equity interest and future royalties on sales of products. In February 2007, the Company and
IntraLase terminated the license agreement pursuant to the settlement agreement discussed above.
To further diversify its product portfolio, in January 1999, the Companys Vascular subsidiary
acquired the vascular access product line from Endologix, formerly Radiance Medical Systems, Inc.
Vasculars products use Doppler technology to aid medical personnel in locating arteries and veins
in difficult circumstances. Currently, this product line is concentrated in the cardiac
catheterization market. In January 2000, the Company purchased Sonomed, a privately held
manufacturer of ophthalmic ultrasound diagnostic equipment.
On July 23, 2004, the Company acquired 67% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Drew, a
United Kingdom company, pursuant to the Companys exchange offer for all of the outstanding
ordinary shares of Drew, and acquired all of the Drew shares during fiscal 2005. Drew is a
diagnostics company specializing in the design, manufacture and distribution of instruments for
blood cell counting and blood analysis. Drew is focused on providing instrumentation and
consumables for the physician office and
13
Table of Contents
veterinary office laboratories. Drew also supplies the reagent and other consumable materials
needed to operate the instruments.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that impact amounts reported therein. The most significant of those involve the application for
SFAS 142, discussed further in Note 2 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this report. The financial statements are prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and, as such, include
amounts based on informed estimates and judgments of management. For example, estimates are used
in determining valuation allowances for deferred income taxes, uncollectible receivables, obsolete
inventory, sales returns and rebates and purchased intangible assets. Actual results achieved in
the future could differ from current estimates. The Company used what it believes are reasonable
assumptions and, where applicable, established valuation techniques in making its estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its products at the time of shipment, when
title and risk of loss transfer. The Company provides products to its distributors at agreed
wholesale prices and to the balance of its customers at set retail prices. Distributors can
receive discounts for accepting high volume shipments. The discounts are reflected immediately in
the net invoice price, which is the basis for revenue recognition. No further material discounts
are given.
The Companys considerations for recognizing revenue upon shipment of product to a distributor
are based on the following:
| Persuasive evidence that an arrangement (purchase order and sales invoice) exists between a willing buyer (distributor) and the Company that outlines the terms of the sale (company information, quantity of goods, purchase price and payment terms). The buyer (distributor) does not have an immediate right of return. | ||
| Shipping terms are ex-factory shipping point. At this point the buyer (distributor) takes title to the goods and is responsible for all risks and rewards of ownership, including insuring the goods as necessary. | ||
| The Companys price to the buyer (distributor) is fixed and determinable as specifically outlined on the sales invoice. The sales arrangement does not have customer cancellation or termination clauses. | ||
| The buyer (distributor) places a purchase order with the Company; the terms of the sale are cash, COD or credit. Customer credit is determined based on the Companys policies and procedures related to the buyers (distributors) creditworthiness. Based on this determination, the Company believes that collectibility is reasonably assured. |
The Company assesses collectibility based on creditworthiness of the customer and past
transaction history. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not
require collateral from its customers. For many of the Companys international customers, the
Company requires an irrevocable letter of credit to be issued by the customer before the purchase
order is accepted.
Valuation of Intangible Assets
The Company annually evaluates for impairment its intangible assets and goodwill in accordance
with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, or whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. These intangible assets
include goodwill, trademarks and trade names. Factors the Company considers important that could
trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to historical or
projected future operating results or significant negative industry or economic trends. If these
criteria indicate that the value of the intangible asset may be impaired, an evaluation of the
recoverability of the net carrying value of the asset is made. If
14
Table of Contents
this evaluation indicates that the intangible asset is not recoverable, the net carrying value
of the related intangible asset will be reduced to fair value. Any such impairment charge could be
significant and could have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial statements if and
when an impairment charge is recorded. No impairment losses were recorded for goodwill, trademarks
and trade names during any of the periods presented based on these evaluations.
(Loss)/Income Per Share
The Company computes net (loss)/income per share under the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share (SFAS 128), and Staff Accounting Bulletin, No. 98 (SAB 98).
Under the provisions of SFAS 128 and SAB 98, basic and diluted net (loss)/income per share is
computed by dividing the net (loss)/income for the period by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted net (loss)/income per
share excludes potential common shares if the effect is anti-dilutive. Basic earnings per share
are computed by dividing net (loss)/income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are determined in the same manner as
basic earnings per share, except that the number of shares is increased by assuming exercise of
dilutive stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method.
Taxes
Estimates of taxable income of the various legal entities and jurisdictions are used in the
tax rate calculation. Management uses judgment in estimating what the Companys income will be for
the year. Since judgment is involved, there is a risk that the tax rate may significantly increase
or decrease in any period.
In determining (loss)/income for financial statement purposes, management must make certain
estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax
liabilities and in the determination of the recoverability of certain of the deferred tax assets,
which arise from temporary differences between the tax and financial statement recognition of
revenue and expense. SFAS 109 also requires that the deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation
allowance, if based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion
of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods.
In evaluating the Companys ability to recover the Companys deferred tax assets, management
considers all available positive and negative evidence including the Companys past operating
results, the existence of cumulative losses and near-term forecasts of future taxable income that
is consistent with the plans and estimates management is using to manage the underlying businesses.
Through December 31, 2007, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the
Companys net operating losses due to the uncertainty of their realization as a result of the
Companys earnings history, the number of years the Companys net operating losses and tax credits
can be carried forward, the existence of taxable temporary differences and near-term earnings
expectations. The amount of the valuation allowance could decrease if facts and circumstances
change that materially increase taxable income prior to the expiration of the loss carry forwards.
Any reduction would reduce (increase) the income tax expense (benefit) in the period such
determination is made by the Company.
15
Table of Contents
Three- and Six-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
The following table shows consolidated product revenue by business segment as well as
identifying trends in business segment product revenues for the three- and six-month periods ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006. Table amounts are in thousands:
Three-Month Period Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | % Change | 2007 | 2006 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Product Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew |
$ | 3,154 | $ | 2,717 | 16 | % | 6,189 | 5,502 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||
Sonomed |
2,529 | 2,732 | -7 | % | 4,762 | 5,025 | -5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Vascular |
876 | 796 | 10 | % | 1,680 | 1,613 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Medical/Trek |
331 | 379 | -13 | % | 716 | 744 | -4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
EMI |
560 | 411 | 36 | % | 937 | 694 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,450 | $ | 7,035 | 6 | % | 14,284 | 13,578 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Product revenue increased approximately 415,000, or 6%, to $7,450,000 for the three-month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
In the Drew business unit, product revenue increased $437,000, or 16%, as compared to the same
period last fiscal year. The increase is primarily due to the introduction of the new FDA approved
Trilogy and D3 instruments, and increased reagent revenues generated from Drews United Kingdom
facility. Drew anticipates that its new DS-360 instrument, currently under development, will be
ready for sale in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Product revenue decreased $203,000, or 7%, at the Sonomed business unit as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The decrease in product revenue was primarily caused by an increase
in sales discounts during the period as a result of a large increase in sales to the more price
sensitive international market combined with a decrease in overall domestic sales of the Companys
new Vumax II ultrasound systems.
Product revenue increased $80,000, or 10%, to $876,000 in the Vascular business unit during
the three-month period ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
The increase in product revenue in the Vascular business unit was primarily caused by an increase
in direct sales to end users by the Companys domestic sales team, and by turning over the
territory of a terminated domestic distributor to the domestic sales team.
In the Medical/Trek business unit, product revenue decreased $48,000, or 13%, to $331,000
during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal
year. The decrease in Medical/Trek product revenue is primarily attributed to a decrease in the
sale of Treks mature product line of Ispan Intraocular gases and fiber optic sources.
Product revenue increased $149,000, or 36%, in the EMI business unit when compared to the same
period last year. This is due to increased sales of digital imaging systems.
Product revenue increased approximately $706,000, or 5%, to $14,284,000 during the six-month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
In the Drew business unit, product revenue increased $687,000, or 12%, as compared to the same
period last fiscal year. The increase in product revenue is attributable to the introduction of
the new FDA approved Trilogy and D3 instruments, and increased reagent revenues generated from
Drews United
16
Table of Contents
Kingdom facility. Drew anticipates that its new DS-360 instrument, currently under development,
will be ready for sale in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
In the Sonomed business unit, product revenue decreased $263,000, or 5%, as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The decrease in product revenue was primarily caused by an increase
in sales discounts during the period as a result of a large increase in sales to the more price
sensitive international market combined with a decrease in overall domestic sales of the Companys
new Vumax II ultrasound systems.
In the Vascular business unit, product revenue increased $67,000, or 4%, to $1,680,000 during
the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. The
increase in product revenue in the Vascular business unit was primarily caused an increase in
direct sales to end users by the Companys domestic sales team, and by turning over the territory
of a terminated domestic distributor to the domestic sales team.
In the Medical/Trek business unit, product revenue decreased $28,000, or 4%, to $716,000
during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal
year. The decrease in Medical/Trek product revenue is primarily attributed to a decrease in the
sale of Treks mature product line of Ispan Intraocular gases and fiber optic sources.
Product revenue increased $243,000, or 35%, during the six-month period ended December 31,
2007 in the EMI business unit when compared to the same period last year. This is due to increased
sales of digital imaging systems.
The following table shows consolidated other revenue by business segment as well as
identifying trends in business segment other revenues for the three- and six-month periods ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006. Table amounts are in thousands:
Three-Month Period Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | % Change | 2007 | 2006 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Other Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew |
$ | 45 | $ | 55 | -18 | % | 105 | 125 | -16 | % | ||||||||||||||
Sonomed |
0 | 0 | 0 | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Vascular |
0 | 0 | 0 | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Medical/Trek |
0 | 547 | -100 | % | 0 | 1,102 | -100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
EMI |
0 | 0 | 0 | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 45 | $ | 602 | -93 | % | 105 | 1,227 | -91 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other revenue decreased by approximately $557,000, or 93%, to $45,000 during the three-month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. Other revenue also
decreased by approximately $1,122,000, or 8.2%, to $1,227,000 during the six-month period ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. The decreases are attributable
to decreased royalties received from the IntraLase License Agreement as a result of the settlement
agreement between the Company and IntraLase dated February 27, 2007. Under the settlement
agreement, IntraLase made a lump-sum payment to the Company of $9,600,000 in exchange for which all
pending litigation between the parties was dismissed, the parties exchanged general releases, the
Companys ownership of all patents and intellectual property formerly licensed to IntraLase from
the Company was obtained by IntraLase, and the license agreement has terminated. In addition, the
payment from IntraLase satisfied all outstanding past, current and future royalties owed or alleged
to be owed by IntraLase to the Company.
17
Table of Contents
The following table presents consolidated cost of goods sold by reportable business segment
and as a percentage of related segment product revenues for the three- and six-month periods ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006. Table amounts are in thousands:
Three-Month Period | Six-Month Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended December 31, | Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | % | 2006 | % | 2007 | % | 2006 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew |
$ | 1,942 | 62 | % | $ | 1,922 | 71 | % | 3,844 | 62 | % | 3,681 | 67 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Sonomed |
1,209 | 48 | % | 1,220 | 45 | % | 2,466 | 52 | % | 2,407 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vascular |
351 | 40 | % | 305 | 38 | % | 634 | 38 | % | 618 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Medical/Trek |
212 | 64 | % | 245 | 65 | % | 466 | 65 | % | 499 | 67 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
EMI |
237 | 42 | % | 186 | 45 | % | 464 | 50 | % | 304 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,951 | 53 | % | $ | 3,878 | 55 | % | 7,874 | 55 | % | 7,509 | 55 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold totaled approximately $3,951,000, or 53% of product revenue, for the
three-month period ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $3,878,000 or 55%, of product revenue
for the same period last fiscal year.
Cost of goods sold in the Drew business unit totaled $1,942,000, or 62% of product revenue,
for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $1,922,000, or 71% of product
revenue, for the same period last fiscal year. The decline in cost of goods sold as a percentage
of product revenue is attributable to the increase in product revenue for the three-month period
ended December 31, 2007. While cost of goods sold has remained steady, product revenue increased
$437,000, or 16%, for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period
last fiscal year. Cost of sales did not increase the same percentage as product revenue due to
increased reagent revenues generated from Drews United Kingdom facility that generate
approximately an 80% gross margin.
Cost of goods sold in the Sonomed business unit totaled $1,209,000, or 48% of product revenue,
for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $1,220,000, or 45% of product
revenue, for the same period last fiscal year. The rise in cost of goods sold as a percentage of
product revenue is attributable to the decrease in product revenue for the three-month period ended
December 31, 2007. While cost of goods sold has remained steady, product revenue decreased
$203,000, or 7%, for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period
last fiscal year. This was primarily caused by an increase in sales discounts during the period as
a result of a large increase in sales to the more price sensitive international market combined
with a decrease in overall domestic sales of the Companys new Vumax II ultrasound systems.
Cost of goods sold in the Vascular business unit totaled $351,000, or 40% of product revenue,
for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $305,000, or 38% of product
revenue, for the same period last fiscal year.
Cost of goods sold in the Medical/Trek business unit totaled $212,000, or 64% of product
revenue, for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $245,000, or 65% of
product revenue, for the same period last fiscal year.
Cost of goods sold in the EMI business unit totaled $237,000, or 42% of product revenue, for
the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $186,000, or 45% of product revenue,
during
the same period last fiscal year. The primary factor affecting the increase in cost of goods
sold of $51,000, or 27%, was a like increase in product revenue of $149,000, or 36%, for the same
period.
Cost of goods sold totaled approximately $7,874,000, or 55% of product revenue, for the
six-month period ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $7,509,000, or 55% of product revenue, for
the same period last fiscal year.
18
Table of Contents
Cost of goods sold in the Drew business unit totaled $3,844,000, or 62% of product revenue,
for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $3,681,000, or 67% of product
revenue, for the same period last fiscal year. The decline in cost of goods sold as a percentage
of product revenue is attributable to the increase in product revenue for the six-month period
ended December 31, 2007. While cost of goods sold has remained steady, product revenue increased
$687,000, or 12%, for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period
last fiscal year. Cost of sales did not increase the same percentage as product revenue due to
increased reagent revenues generated from Drews United Kingdom facility that generate
approximately an 80% gross margin.
Cost of goods sold in the Sonomed business unit totaled $2,466,000, or 52% of product revenue,
for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $2,407,000 or 48% of product
revenue, for the same period last fiscal year. The rise in cost of goods sold as a percentage of
product revenue is attributable to the decrease in product revenue for the six-month period ended
December 31, 2007. While cost of goods sold has remained steady, product revenue decreased
$263,000, or 5%, for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 primarily caused by an increase
in sales discounts during the period as a result of a large increase in sales to the more price
sensitive international market combined with a decrease in overall domestic sales of the Companys
new Vumax II ultrasound systems.
Cost of goods sold in the Vascular business unit totaled $634,000, or 38% of product revenue,
for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $618,000, or 38% of product
revenue, for the same period last fiscal year.
Cost of goods sold in the Medical/Trek business unit totaled $466,000, or 65% of product
revenue, for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $499,000 or 67% of product
revenue, during the same period last fiscal year.
Cost of goods sold in the EMI business unit totaled $464,000, or 50%, of product revenue for
the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $304,000, or 44%, of product revenue,
during the same period last fiscal year. As in prior periods, the primary factor affecting the
increase in cost of goods sold of $160,000, or 53%, was a like increase in product revenue of
$243,000, or 35%, for the same period.
The following table presents consolidated marketing, general and administrative expenses as
well as identifying trends in business segment marketing, general and administrative expenses for
the three- and six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Table amounts are in thousands:
Three-Month Period Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | % Change | 2007 | 2006 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Marketing, General and Administrative: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew |
$ | 1,283 | $ | 1,277 | 0 | % | 2,287 | 2,660 | -14 | % | ||||||||||||||
Sonomed |
895 | 762 | 17 | % | 1,707 | 1,569 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Vascular |
425 | 412 | 3 | % | 833 | 942 | -12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Medical/Trek |
629 | 582 | 8 | % | 1,188 | 1,337 | -11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
EMI |
140 | 113 | 24 | % | 297 | 193 | 54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,372 | $ | 3,146 | 7 | % | 6,312 | 6,701 | -6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased $226,000, or 7%, to $3,372,000 during
the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
19
Table of Contents
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Drew business unit increased $6,000, or
0.5%, to $1,283,000 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same
period last fiscal year.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Sonomed business unit increased
$133,000, or 17%, to $895,000 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The increase was due to increased salaries and bonuses, insurance,
consulting, and travel expenses, including amounts paid to independent agents utilized primarily in
Europe, as well as, meeting and trade show expenses, travel and lodging.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Vascular business unit increased
$13,000, or 3%, to $425,000 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The increase is related to additional meeting expense incurred during
the current three-month period.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Medical/Trek business unit increased
$47,000, or 8%, to $629,000 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The increase was related to increased personnel costs attributed to
headcount, legal fees, and consulting fees pertaining to the roll out of a new CRM/accounting
system.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the EMI business unit increased $27,000, or
24%, to $140,000 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period
last fiscal year. The increase was primarily related to marketing efforts related to increasing
the sales of digital imaging systems by 36% over the prior period.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses decreased $389,000, or 6%, to $6,312,000 for
the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Drew business unit decreased $373,000,
or 14%, to $2,287,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same
period last fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to decreased personnel, travel, facility
and other costs related to the cost reduction plan previously announced and implemented during the
first quarter of fiscal year 2007. The cost savings were realized during the first quarter of the
current fiscal year.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Sonomed business unit increased
$138,000, or 9%, to $1,707,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The increase was due to increased salaries and bonuses, insurance,
consulting, and travel expenses, including amounts paid to independent agents utilized primarily in
Europe, as well as, meeting and trade show expenses, travel and lodging.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Vascular business unit decreased
$109,000, or 12%, to $833,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. The decrease was related primarily to decreased salaries related to
headcount, consulting fees, marketing samples and meeting/exhibits.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the Medical/Trek business unit decreased
$245,000, or 11%, to $1,188,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. As in prior periods, the decrease was directly due to a large
decrease in legal fees related to the IntraLase royalty dispute, which was settled in February
2007.
Marketing, general and administrative expenses in the EMI business unit increased $104,000, or
54%, to $297,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period
last
fiscal year. The increase was primarily related to increased headcount and marketing efforts
related to increasing the sales of digital imaging systems by 35% over the prior period.
20
Table of Contents
The following table presents consolidated research and development expenses as well as
identifying trends in business segment research and development expenses for the three- and
six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Table amounts are in thousands:
Three Month Period Ended | Six-Month Period Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | % Change | 2007 | 2006 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and Development: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drew |
$ | 590 | $ | 875 | -33 | % | 1,192 | 1,333 | -10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Sonomed |
176 | 84 | 110 | % | 340 | 161 | 111 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Vascular |
44 | 36 | 22 | % | 129 | 58 | 122 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Medical/Trek |
0 | 2 | -100 | % | 0 | 91 | -102 | % | |||||||||||||||||
EMI |
67 | 83 | -19 | % | 139 | 151 | -8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 877 | $ | 1,080 | -19 | % | 1,800 | 1,794 | 0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses decreased $203,000, or 19%, to $877,000 during the
three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
Research and development expenses in the Drew business unit decreased $285,000, or 33%, to
$590,000 during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The decrease was primarily related to efficiencies achieved by moving Drews research
and development department to Dallas from the UK and other savings resulting from the full
realization of the cost reduction measures implemented in the prior
fiscal period. Research and development on Drews DS-360 project
is expected to continue through the fourth quarter of the current fiscal
year.
Research and development expenses in the Sonomed business unit increased $92,000, or 110%, to
$176,000 during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The increase was due to expenses incurred in developing Sonomeds new Master-Vu
B-Scan system, which received FDA approval on January 3, 2008.
Research and development expenses in the Vascular business unit increased $8,000, or 22%, to
$44,000 during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The increase was primarily due to completing the VascuViewTM, a new visual ultrasound
device, which received FDA approval on January 20, 2008.
Research and development expenses in the Medical/Trek business unit decreased $2,000, or 100%,
to $0 during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year.
Research and development expenses in the EMI business unit decreased $16,000, or 19%, to
$67,000 during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to higher expenses in the prior period related to
various enhancements to EMIs digital systems.
Research and development expenses increased $6,000, or 0.3%, to $1,800,000 during the
six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
Research
and development expenses in the Drew business unit decreased
$141,000, or 11%, to
$1,192,000 during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The decrease is related to efficiencies achieved by moving Drews research and
development department to Dallas from the UK, and by the full realization of the cost reduction
measures implemented
in the prior fiscal period. These decreases have been offset by increased consulting and
personnel expenses related to the ongoing development of the new DS-360 instrument expected to be
introduced in the fourth quarter of this fiscal year.
21
Table of Contents
Research and development expenses in the Sonomed business unit increased $179,000, or 111%, to
$340,000 during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The increase was due to expenses incurred in developing Sonomeds new Master-VuTM
system, which received FDA approval on January 3, 2008.
Research and development expenses in the Vascular business unit increased $71,000, or 122%, to
$129,000 during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The increase was primarily due to completing the VascuViewTM, a new visual ultrasound
device, which received FDA approval on January 20, 2008.
Research
and development expenses in the Medical/Trek business unit decreased $91,000, or
100%, to $0 during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same
period last fiscal year. The decrease was realized in the prior quarter of the current fiscal year
and is primarily due to decreased salaries related to the full realization of the cost reduction
initiatives implemented in the prior year.
Research and development expenses in the EMI business unit decreased $12,000, or 8%, to
$139,000 during the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the same period last
fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to higher expenses in the prior period related to
various enhancements to EMIs digital systems.
The Company recognized a loss of $35,000 and $20,000 related to its investment in OTM during
the three-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $110,000 and $45,000
for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Commencing July 1, 2005,
the Company began recognizing all of the losses of OTM in its consolidated financial statements.
OTM is an early stage privately held company. Prior to July 1, 2005, the share of OTMs loss
recognized by the Company was in direct proportion to the Companys ownership equity in OTM. OTM
began operations during the three-month period ended September 30, 2004.
Interest income was $85,000 and $14,000 for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The increase was due to larger average cash balances during the current
fiscal period.
Interest income was $187,000 and $59,000 for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The increase was due to lower average cash balances due during the current
fiscal period.
Interest expense was $3,000 and $6,000 for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and
2005, respectively, and $6,000 and $15,000 for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The decrease reflects the continued reduction of the Companys debt in the
normal course of business by $95,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007.
22
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Changes in overall liquidity and capital resources from continuing operations during the
three-month period ended December 31, 2007 are reflected in the following table (in thousands):
December 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2007 | 2007 | |||||||
Current Ratio: |
||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 20,064 | $ | 21,763 | ||||
Less: Current liabilities |
4,132 | 4,525 | ||||||
Working capital |
$ | 15,932 | $ | 17,238 | ||||
Current ratio |
4.9 to 1 | 4.8 to 1 | ||||||
Debt to Total Capital Ratio: |
||||||||
Notes payable and current maturities |
$ | 55 | $ | 150 | ||||
Long-term debt |
1,087 | 1,087 | ||||||
Total debt |
$ | 1,142 | $ | 1,237 | ||||
Total equity |
38,073 | 39,406 | ||||||
Total capital |
$ | 39,215 | $ | 33,100 | ||||
Total debt to total capital |
2.9 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||
Working Capital Position
Working capital decreased approximately $1,397,000 as of December 31, 2007, and the current
ratio remained steady at 4.8 to 1 when compared to June 30, 2007. The decrease in working capital
was caused primarily by the loss from operations of approximately $1,529,000 and cash used to fund
fixed asset additions of approximately $143,000.
Cash Used in Operating Activities
During the six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company used approximately
$1,026,000 and $1,689,000 of cash for operating activities. The net decrease in cash used for
operating activities of approximately $663,000 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year is due primarily to the following factors:
The Company had a net loss of $1,468,000 and experienced net cash out flow from a decrease in
accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $297,000. These cash out flows were
partially offset by a decrease in inventory of $231,000 and non-cash expenditures on depreciation
and amortization of $296,000. In the prior fiscal period the cash used in operating activities of
$1,689,000 was related to net loss in the prior year of $1,184,000 and increases in accounts
receivable and inventory of approximately $645,000 and $1,149,000, respectively. These cash out
flows were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $700,000.
Cash Flows (Used in) / Provided by Investing and Financing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities of $176,000 is related to fixed asset purchases and
investments in OTM of $143,000 and $33,000, respectively, during the six-month period ended
December 31, 2007. The decrease in cash flows from investing activities from the prior fiscal
period was $61,000. The change relates primarily to increased fixed asset purchases.
23
Table of Contents
Cash flows used in financing activities were approximately $88,000 during the six-month period
ended December 31, 2007. During the period, the Company made scheduled long-term debt repayments
of approximately $96,000 and received $7,000 from the exercise of stock options during the period.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the same period last year were approximately
$33,000. During the prior fiscal period, the Company made scheduled long-term debt repayments of
approximately $108,000, which was offset by cash received from the exercise of stock options in the
amount of $141,000.
Debt History
Drew has long-term debt facilities through the Texas Mezzanine Fund and through Symbiotics,
Inc. The Texas Mezzanine Fund term debt is payable in monthly installments of $14,200, which
includes variable interest rates at prime plus 4%. The note is due in April 2008 and is secured by
certain assets of Drew. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2007 was $54,552.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
Escalon was not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements during the three and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The following table presents the Companys contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007
(interest is not included in the table as it is immaterial):
Less than 1 | More than 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Years | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 54,552 | $ | 54,552 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Operating lease agreements |
2,827,401 | 667,919 | 1,430,016 | 402,380 | 327,086 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,881,953 | $ | 722,471 | $ | 1,430,016 | $ | 402,380 | $ | 327,086 | ||||||||||
Significant Items Likely To Impact Liquidity
On July 23, 2004, the Company acquired approximately 67% of the outstanding ordinary shares of
Drew, pursuant to the Companys exchange offer for all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Drew,
and acquired all of the Drew shares during fiscal 2005. Drew does not have a history of producing
positive operating cash flows and, as a result, at the time of acquisition, was operating under
financial constraints and was under-capitalized. As Drew is integrated into the Company,
management will be working to reverse the situation, while at the same time seeking to strengthen
Drews market position. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has loaned approximately $16,725,000
to Drew. The funds have been primarily used to procure components to build up inventory to support
the manufacturing process, to pay off accounts payable and debt of Drew, to fund new product
development and underwrite operating losses incurred since acquisition. The Company anticipates
that further working capital will likely be required by Drew.
24
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
The table below provides information about the Companys financial instruments consisting of
both variable and fixed interest rate debt obligations. For debt obligations, the table represents
principal cash flows and related interest rates by expected maturity dates. Interest rates as of
December 31, 2007 were variable at prime plus 4%, currently 11.25% per annum, on the Texas
Mezzanine Fund debt.
2008 | ||||
Texas Mezzanine Fund Note |
$ | 54,552 | ||
Interest rate |
Prime Plus 4% | |||
Total |
$ | 54,552 | ||
Exchange Rate Risk
Prior to the acquisition of Drew, the price of all product sold overseas was denominated in
United States Dollars and consequently the Company incurred no exchange rate risk on revenue.
However, a portion of Drews product revenue is denominated in United Kingdom Pounds and Euros.
During the three-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, Drew recorded approximately
$1,032,000 and $830,000 respectively, of revenue denominated in United Kingdom Pounds and Euros,
respectively. During the six-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, Drew recorded
approximately $1,976,000 and $1,547,000, respectively, of revenue denominated in United Kingdom
Pounds and Euros, respectively.
Drew incurs a portion of its expenses denominated in United Kingdom Pounds. During the
three-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, Drew incurred approximately $1,040,000 and
$1,158,000, respectively, of expense denominated in United Kingdom Pounds. During the six-month
periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, Drew recorded approximately $1,951,000 and $2,142,000
respectively, of expense denominated in United Kingdom Pounds and Euros, respectively. The
Companys Sonomed and Vascular business units incur an immaterial portion of their marketing
expenses in the European market, the majority of which are transacted in Euros.
Total Foreign Sales
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||
Drew UK |
1,032,316 | 829,900 | 1,976,238 | 1,546,904 |
Total Foreign Expenses
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | December 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||
Drew UK |
1,040,035 | 1,157,497 | 1,951,194 | 2,142,512 |
The Company experiences fluctuations, beneficial or adverse, in the valuation of currencies in
which the Company transacts its business, namely the United States Dollar, the United Kingdom Pound
and the Euro.
25
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(A) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, have established disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to the officers who certify the Companys financial reports and to other members of
senior management and the Board of Directors.
Based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31,
2007, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company
have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
SEC rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company
files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(B) Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as
such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the first fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See note 4 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information regarding the Companys legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The
Company incorporates by reference the risk factors set forth in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2007. There are no material changes from the risk
factors previously disclosed in the Companys annual report on Form
10-K for the period ended June 30, 2007.
Item 4T. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on December 28, 2007. The following matters were acted
upon:
The following persons were elected as Class I directors of the Company, each for a term of
three years and until his or her successor is elected and qualified.
Nominees for Director | For | Against | Withheld | |||||||||
Lisa A. Napolitano |
4,879,579 | 0 | 328,917 | |||||||||
Fred G. Choate |
4,878,684 | 0 | 329,812 |
The other persons continuing as Directors of the Company after the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders are Anthony J. Coppola, Richard J. DePiano, Jay L. Federman, M.D., and William L.G.
Kwan.
26
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer under Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
31.2
|
Certificate of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer under Rule 13a-14(a). | |
32.1
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer under Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code. | |
32.2
|
Certificate of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer under Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code. |
27
Table of Contents
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Escalon Medical Corp. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: February 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Richard J. DePiano | ||
Richard J. DePiano | ||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: February 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Robert OConnor | ||
Robert OConnor | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
28