ESPEY MFG & ELECTRONICS CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
S QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2010
OR
£ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission
File Number I-4383
ESPEY MFG. & ELECTRONICS
CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW YORK
|
14-1387171
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer's Identification No.)
|
233 Ballston Avenue,
Saratoga Springs, New York 12866
(Address
of principal executive offices)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code 518-584-4100
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. S
Yes £
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company:
£ Large accelerated
filer
£ Accelerated filer
£ Non-accelerated
filer
S Smaller reporting company
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company. £
Yes S
No
At May
12, 2010, there were 2,319,876 shares outstanding of the registrant's Common
stock, $.33-1/3 par value.
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
I N D E
X
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE
|
||
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|||
Balance
Sheets - March 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2009
|
1
|
|||
Statements
of Income (Unaudited) -Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and
2009
|
3
|
|||
Statements
of Cash Flows (Unaudited)-Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and
2009
|
4
|
|||
Notes
to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
Item
2
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
8
|
||
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
11
|
||
Item
4T
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
11
|
||
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
12
|
||
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
12
|
||
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
12
|
||
Item
3
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
12
|
||
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
12
|
||
Item
5
|
Other
Information
|
12
|
||
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
12
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
13
|
|||
PART
I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
Balance
Sheets
March 31,
2010 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 1,362,948 | $ | 2,775,319 | ||||
Short
term investments
|
7,771,004 | 6,349,874 | ||||||
Trade
accounts receivable, net
|
4,332,561 | 5,133,792 | ||||||
Income
tax receivable
|
175,844 | -- | ||||||
Other
receivables
|
10 | 297 | ||||||
ESOP
receivable due to dividends on unallocated shares
|
98,571 | 71,053 | ||||||
Inventories:
|
||||||||
Raw
materials
|
1,330,200 | 1,394,441 | ||||||
Work-in-process
|
1,744,608 | 1,107,880 | ||||||
Costs
relating to contracts in process, net of advance
|
||||||||
payments
of $143,748 at March 31, 2010 and
|
||||||||
$60,079
at June 30, 2009
|
9,470,199 | 10,526,884 | ||||||
Total
inventories
|
12,545,007 | 13,029,205 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
220,673 | 224,835 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
192,072 | 233,072 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
26,698,690 | 27,817,447 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
2,780,044 | 2,738,222 | ||||||
Loan
receivable
|
20,679 | 38,673 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 29,499,413 | $ | 30,594,342 | ||||
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
|
(Continued)
|
|||||||
1
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
Balance
Sheets
March 31,
2010 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 1,395,174 | $ | 999,521 | ||||
Accrued
expenses:
|
||||||||
Salaries,
wages and commissions
|
157,454 | 219,533 | ||||||
Vacation
|
545,400 | 520,072 | ||||||
Other
|
40,177 | 42,863 | ||||||
Payroll
and other taxes withheld and accrued
|
45,240 | 42,075 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
-- | 266,891 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,183,445 | 2,090,955 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
77,512 | 99,253 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,260,957 | 2,190,208 | ||||||
Common
stock, par value $.33-1/3 per share.
|
||||||||
Authorized
10,000,000 shares; issued 3,029,874 shares
|
||||||||
on
March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009. Outstanding
|
||||||||
2,319,876
and 2,314,803 (includes 184,791 and 201,666
|
||||||||
Unearned
ESOP Shares on March 31, 2010 and
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009, respectively)
|
1,009,958 | 1,009,958 | ||||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
14,061,851 | 13,755,808 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
22,230,274 | 23,485,675 | ||||||
37,302,083 | 38,251,441 | |||||||
Less: Unearned
ESOP shares
|
(2,914,077 | ) | (2,914,077 | ) | ||||
Treasury
shares, cost of 709,998 shares on March
|
||||||||
31,
2010 and 715,071 shares on June 30, 2009
|
(7,149,550 | ) | (6,933,230 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
27,238,456 | 28,404,134 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 29,499,413 | $ | 30,594,342 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
2
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
Statements
of Income (Unaudited)
Three and
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
Three
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 6,955,827 | $ | 6,709,880 | $ | 19,697,098 | $ | 18,957,576 | ||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
5,117,045 | 4,977,068 | 14,338,021 | 15,447,559 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,838,782 | 1,732,812 | 5,359,077 | 3,510,017 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and
|
||||||||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
753,414 | 658,115 | 2,302,549 | 2,125,927 | ||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
1,085,368 | 1,074,697 | 3,056,528 | 1,384,090 | ||||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
and dividend income
|
15,890 | 72,982 | 84,554 | 268,866 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
9,314 | (2,278 | ) | 27,399 | 13,635 | |||||||||||
25,204 | 70,704 | 111,953 | 282,501 | |||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
1,110,572 | 1,145,401 | 3,168,481 | 1,666,591 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
301,849 | 364,129 | 852,824 | 529,436 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 808,723 | $ | 781,272 | $ | 2,315,657 | $ | 1,137,155 | ||||||||
Net
income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | .38 | $ | .37 | $ | 1.09 | $ | .54 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | .38 | $ | .37 | $ | 1.08 | $ | .54 | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of
|
||||||||||||||||
shares
outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
2,127,135 | 2,113,772 | 2,127,514 | 2,107,735 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
2,138,898 | 2,115,696 | 2,135,836 | 2,114,732 | ||||||||||||
Dividends
per share:
|
$ | .2250 | $ | .2250 | $ | 1.6750 | $ | 2.1750 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
3
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
Statements
of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 2,315,657 | $ | 1,137,155 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net
|
||||||||
cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
3,138 | 30,245 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
76,408 | 85,111 | ||||||
Depreciation
|
342,405 | 369,379 | ||||||
ESOP
compensation expense
|
310,273 | 326,263 | ||||||
Loss
(gain) on disposal of assets
|
1,802 | (996 | ) | |||||
Deferred
income tax
|
(17,579 | ) | (25,046 | ) | ||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Decrease
(increase) in trade receivables, net
|
801,231 | (1,134,521 | ) | |||||
(Increase)
decrease in income taxes receivable
|
(175,844 | ) | 133,363 | |||||
Decrease
in other receivables
|
287 | 4,249 | ||||||
Increase
in ESOP receivable due to dividends on unallocated shares
|
(27,518 | ) | (163,112 | ) | ||||
Decrease
(increase) in inventories
|
484,198 | (2,530,106 | ) | |||||
Decrease
in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
41,000 | 97,179 | ||||||
Increase
in accounts payable
|
395,653 | 1,459,344 | ||||||
(Decrease)
increase in accrued salaries, wages and commissions
|
(62,079 | ) | 51,243 | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in vacation accrual
|
25,328 | (40,212 | ) | |||||
Decrease
in ESOP payable
|
(310,273 | ) | (326,263 | ) | ||||
(Decrease)
increase in other accrued expenses
|
(2,686 | ) | 2,036 | |||||
Decrease
in payroll & other taxes withheld and accrued
|
3,165 | 490 | ||||||
Decrease
in income taxes payable
|
(270,029 | ) | (30,245 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
3,934,537 | (554,444 | ) | |||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Additions
to property, plant & equipment
|
(386,029 | ) | (211,952 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from loan receivable
|
17,994 | 19,672 | ||||||
Purchase
of short term investments
|
(7,594,731 | ) | (7,318,000 | ) | ||||
Maturity
of short term investments
|
6,173,601 | 6,788,000 | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,789,165 | ) | (722,280 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Sale
of treasury stock
|
326,752 | -- | ||||||
Dividends
on common stock
|
(3,571,058 | ) | (4,574,062 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(452,155 | ) | (311,545 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
135,580 | 132,532 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
3,138 | 30,245 | ||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(3,557,743 | ) | (4,722,830 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,412,371 | ) | (5,999,554 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
2,775,319 | 6,851,753 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
1,362,948 | 852,199 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | 1,310,000 | $ | 400,000 |
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
Notes to Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1.
Basis of Presentation
In the
opinion of management the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain
all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for
a fair presentation of the results for such periods. The results for
any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for the full fiscal year. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed
or omitted. The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and
judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, inventories, income
taxes, and stock-based compensation. Management bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's most
recent audited financial statements included in its report on Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 2009.
Note 2.
Net Income per Share
Basic net
income per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue
common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in the income of the
Company. As Unearned ESOP shares are released or
committed-to-be-released the shares become outstanding for earnings-per-share
computations.
Note 3.
Stock Based Compensation
The
Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (FASB ASC
718) in establishing standards for the accounting for transactions in which an
entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, as well as
transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or
services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or
that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. FASB
ASC 718 requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value
of the share-based payment. FASB ASC 718 establishes fair value as
the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment transactions
with employees, except for equity instruments held by employee share ownership
plans.
Total
stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Statement of Income for the
three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, was $25,552 and $26,945,
respectively, before income taxes. The related total deferred tax
benefit was approximately $2,043 and $2,399 for the three month period ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total stock-based compensation
expense recognized in the Statement of Income for the nine month period ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, was $76,408 and $85,111, respectively, before income
taxes. The related total deferred tax benefit was approximately
$6,703 and $7,353 for the nine month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. FASB ASC 718 requires the tax benefits resulting from
tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options
to be classified and reported as both an operating cash outflow and a financing
cash inflow on a prospective basis upon adoption.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was approximately $45,580 of unrecognized compensation
cost related to stock option awards that is expected to be recognized as expense
over the next 1.5 years. The total deferred tax benefit related to
these awards is approximately $4,013.
5
The
Company has one employee stock option plan under which options may be granted,
the 2007 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (the "2007 Plan"). The Board of
Directors may grant options to acquire shares of common stock to employees of
the Company at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of
grant. Generally, options granted have a two-year vesting period
based on two years of continuous service and have a ten-year contractual
life. Option grants provide for accelerated vesting if there is a
change in control. Shares issued upon the exercise of options are
from those held in Treasury. The 2007 Plan was approved by the
Company's shareholders at the Company's Annual Meeting on November 30, 2007 and
supersedes the Company's 2000 Stock Option Plan (the "2000
Plan"). Options covering 400,000 shares are authorized for issuance
under the 2007 Plan, and 60,800 have been granted and are outstanding as of
March 31, 2010. While no further grants of options may be made under
the 2000 Plan, as of March 31, 2010, 67,400 options remain outstanding, vested
and exercisable from the 2000 Plan.
FASB ASC
718 requires the use of a valuation model to calculate the fair value of
stock-based awards. The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option
valuation model, which incorporates various assumptions including those for
volatility, expected life and interest rates.
The
weighted average assumptions that the Company used to calculate the fair value
of each option award for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
were as follows:
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Dividend
yield
|
5.3 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||
Expected
stock price volatility
|
31.41 | % | 31.41 | % | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.79 | % | 1.79 | % | ||||
Expected
option life (in years)
|
4.3
yrs
|
4.3
yrs
|
||||||
Weighted
average fair value per share of options granted during the
period
|
$ | 2.767 | $ | 2.767 |
The
Company pays dividends quarterly and anticipates that it will be able to
continue to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Expected stock price
volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The
risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury
issues with an equivalent term approximating the expected life of the options.
The expected option life (in years) represents the estimated period of time
until exercise and is based on actual historical experience.
The
following table summarizes stock option activity during the nine months ended
March 31, 2010:
|
Employee Stock Options
Plan
|
|||||||||||
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||
|
Number
of
|
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||
|
Shares
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
|||||||||
|
Subject
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
|||||||||
|
To Option
|
Price
|
Term
|
|||||||||
Balance
at July 1, 2009
|
140,400 | $ | 18.29 | 7.90 | ||||||||
Granted
|
2,500 | $ | 17.09 | 9.34 | ||||||||
Exercised
|
(8,100 | ) | $ | 16.74 | -- | |||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(6,600 | ) | $ | 18.97 | -- | |||||||
Balance
March 31, 2010
|
128,200 | $ | 18.33 | 7.27 | ||||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2010
|
67,400 | $ | 17.48 | 6.12 |
The
intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $23,046 and $21,073, during the
nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable as of March 31,
2010 and 2009 was $176,420 and $25,120, respectively.
Note
4. Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company at certain times enters into standby letters of credit agreements with
financial institutions primarily relating to the guarantee of future performance
on certain contracts. Contingent liabilities on outstanding standby
letters of credit agreements aggregated to zero at March 31, 2010. As
a government contractor, the Company is continually subject to audit by various
agencies of the U.S. Government to determine compliance with various procurement
laws and regulations. As a result of such audits and as part of
normal business operations of the Company, various claims and charges can be
asserted against the Company. It is not possible to predict the
outcome of such actions. Currently the Company has no claims or
assertions pending or threatened against it.
6
Note
5. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 165, Subsequent Events (FASB ASC
855-10). FASB ASC 855-10 establishes principles and requirements for
subsequent events. FASB ASC 855-10 is effective for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. Adoption of FASB ASC
855-10 did not have a material effect on the company’s financial
statements.
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 168 (“SFAS 168”), The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification ("Codification") and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Under the provisions of SFAS 168,
the Codification will become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by
the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of the federal securities laws are also
sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of SFAS
168, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature
not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. The
provisions of SFAS 168 are effective for financial statements issued for interim
and annual periods ended after September 15, 2009. Adoption of SFAS
168 had no effect on the company's financial statements.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued ASC 605-25 for revenue recognition with
multiple deliverables. These new standards impact the determination of when the
individual deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be
treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally, these new standards
modify the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the
separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method
of allocating arrangement consideration. These new standards are effective in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, however early adoption is
permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, of
the guidance on its financial statements.
Note 6.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The
Company sponsors a leveraged employee stock ownership plan (the "ESOP") that
covers all nonunion employees who work 1,000 or more hours per year and are
employed on June 30. The Company makes annual contributions to the
ESOP equal to the ESOP's debt service less dividends on unallocated shares
received by the ESOP. All dividends on unallocated shares received by
the ESOP are used to pay debt service. Dividends on allocated ESOP
shares are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings. As the debt
is repaid, shares are released and allocated to active employees, based on the
proportion of debt service paid in the year. The Company accounts for
its ESOP in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Accordingly, the shares
purchased by the ESOP are reported as Unearned ESOP Shares in the statement of
financial position. As shares are released or
committed-to-be-released, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the
current average market price of the shares, and the shares become outstanding
for earnings-per-share (EPS) computations. ESOP compensation
expense was $110,530 and $97,360 for the three month periods ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. ESOP compensation expense was $310,273
and $326,263 for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The ESOP shares as of March 31, 2010 and
2009 were as follows:
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Allocated
Shares
|
431,061 | 426,894 | ||||||
Committed-to-be-released
shares
|
16,875 | 17,500 | ||||||
Unreleased
shares
|
184,791 | 207,500 | ||||||
Total
shares held by the ESOP
|
632,727 | 651,894 | ||||||
Fair
value of unreleased shares
|
$ | 3,714,299 | $ | 3,133,250 |
7
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Overview
Espey
Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (the "Company") located in Saratoga Springs, New
York, is engaged principally in the development, design, production and sale of
specialized electronic power supplies, a wide variety of transformers and other
types of iron-core components, and electronic system components. In some cases,
the Company manufactures such products in accordance with pre-developed
mechanical and electrical requirements (“build to print”). In other cases, the
Company is responsible for both the overall design and manufacture of the
product. The Company does not generally manufacture standardized components and
does not have a product line. The products manufactured by the
Company find application principally in (i) shipboard and land based radar, (ii)
locomotives, (iii) aircraft, (iv) short and medium range communication systems,
(v) navigation systems, and (vi) land-based military vehicle
artillery.
Business
is solicited from large industrial manufacturers and defense companies, the
government of the United States, foreign governments and major foreign
electronic equipment companies. In certain countries the Company has
external sales representatives to help solicit and coordinate foreign contracts.
The Company is also on the eligible list of contractors of agencies of the
United States Department of Defense and generally is automatically solicited by
such agencies for procurement needs falling within the major classes of products
produced by the Company. In addition, the Company directly solicits bids from
the United States Department of Defense for prime contracts.
There is
competition in all classes of products manufactured by the Company from
divisions of the largest electronic companies, as well as many small companies.
The Company's sales do not represent a significant share of the industry's
market for any class of its products. The principal methods of competition for
electronic products of both a military and industrial nature include, among
other factors, price, product performance, the experience of the particular
company and history of its dealings in such products. The Company, as well as
other companies engaged in supplying equipment for military use, is subject to
various risks, including, without limitation, dependence on United States and
foreign government appropriations and program allocations, the competition for
available military business, and government termination of orders for
convenience.
New
orders received in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were approximately $13.7
million, representing a 3.8% decrease from the amount of new orders received in
the first nine months of fiscal 2009. These orders are in line with
the Company’s strategy of getting involved in long-term high quantity military
and industrial products and are predominately for follow-on production of mature
products. The Company's backlog was $33.1 million at March 31, 2010
which includes $21.3 million from three customers compared to $40.0 million at
March 31, 2009 which included $20.9 million from two significant
customers. The backlog for the Company represents the estimated
remaining sales value of work to be performed under firm contracts.
Based
upon the backlog and the anticipated schedule for the fulfillment of orders,
management expects sales for fiscal 2010 to be higher than fiscal 2009
sales. In addition to the backlog, the Company currently has
outstanding quotations and potential business representing approximately $52.8
million in the aggregate for both repeat and new programs.
The
outstanding quotations encompass various new and previously manufactured power
supplies, transformers, and subassemblies. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will acquire any or all of the anticipated orders
described above, many of which are subject to allocations of the United States
defense spending and factors affecting the defense industry and military
procurement generally.
Net sales
to three significant customers represented 64% of the Company's total sales for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 while sales to two significant
customers represented 59% of the Company's total sales for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2009, respectively. Sales to three significant
customers represented 50.9% of the Company's total sales for the nine month
period ended March 31, 2010 while sales to two significant customers represented
65.7% of the Company's total sales for the nine month period ended March 31,
2009, respectively. Historically, a small number of customers have
accounted for a large percentage of the Company’s total sales in any given
fiscal year. Even though our business tends to be concentrated in
several customers, the makeup of those customers is constantly
changing. For several years, management has pursued opportunities
with current and new customers with an overall objective of lowering the
concentration of sales, mitigating excessive reliance upon a single major
product of a particular program and minimizing the impact of the loss of a
single significant customer. Management continues to evaluate its
business development functions and potential revised courses of
action.
8
Management,
along with the Board of Directors, continues to evaluate the need and use of the
Company’s working capital. Expectations are that the working capital
will be required to fund any increase in orders over the next several quarters,
dividend payments, and general operations of the business. Also, the
Mergers and Acquisitions Committee of the Board of Directors continues to
evaluate potential strategic options on a periodic basis.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management
believes our most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition and
estimates to completion.
A
significant portion of our business is comprised of development and production
contracts. Generally, revenues on long-term fixed-price contracts are
recorded on a percentage of completion basis using units of delivery as the
measurement basis for progress toward completion.
Percentage
of completion accounting requires judgment relative to expected sales,
estimating costs and making assumptions related to technical issues and delivery
schedule. Contract costs include material, subcontract costs, labor
and an allocation of overhead costs. The estimation of cost at
completion of a contract is subject to numerous variables involving contract
costs and estimates as to the length of time to complete the
contract. Given the significance of the estimation processes and
judgments described above, it is possible that materially different amounts of
expected sales and contract costs could be recorded if different assumptions
were used, based on changes in circumstances, in the estimation
process. When a change in expected sales value or estimated cost is
determined, changes are reflected in current period earnings.
Results
of Operations
Net sales
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $6,955,827 as compared to
$6,709,880 for the same period in 2009, representing an 3.7% increase. Net sales
for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 were $19,697,098 as compared to
$18,957,576 for the same period in 2009, representing a 3.9%
increase. Generally, the increases and decreases in net
sales can be
attributed to the contract specific nature of the Company's business. The
increase for the three months ended March 31, 2010, was due to an overall increase in
power supply shipments including engineering design services offset by a
decrease in transmitter component shipments. The increase for the
nine months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily due to an increase in transmitter
component and transformer shipments and an increase in engineering design
services offset by a decrease in power supply shipments.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 gross profits were $1,838,782 and
$1,732,812, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was
26.4% and 25.8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 gross
profits were $5,359,077 and $3,510,017, respectively. Gross profit as
a percentage of sales was 27.2% and 18.5%, for the nine months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The primary factor in determining gross
profit and net income is product mix. The gross profits on mature
products and build to print contracts are higher as compared to products which
are still in the engineering development stage or in the early stages of
production. In any given accounting period the mix of product
shipments between higher margin mature programs and less mature programs,
including loss contracts, has a significant impact on gross profit and net
income. The increased gross profit and gross profit percentage in the
three and nine months ended March 2010, was primarily the result of favorable
product mix with only minor cost overruns related to loss
contracts. For the nine months ended March 31, 2009 the Company had
unexpected losses incurred on programs with significant engineering and
production time required for design efforts. These programs
experienced significant cost overruns due to extended product qualification
testing and difficulties moving the products from engineering design into full
production.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses were $753,414 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010; an increase of $95,299, compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2009. Selling, general and
administrative expenses were $2,302,549 for the nine months ended March 31,
2010; an increase of $176,622 compared to the nine months ended March 31,
2009. The increase for the three and nine months ended March 31,
2010, relates
primarily to an increase in salary expense, consulting fees, and director
fees.
9
Management
continues to evaluate the Company’s workforce to ensure that production and
overall execution of the backlog orders and additional anticipated orders are
successfully obtained and executed. Employment of full time
equivalents at March 31, 2010 was 170 compared to 166 people at March 31,
2009.
Other
income for the three and nine months ended March 31,
2010 decreased as compared to the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 due
to decreased interest rates and related interest income on the Company’s cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company does not
believe that there is a significant risk associated with its investment policy,
since at March 31, 2010 all of the investments were primarily represented by
short-term liquid investments including certificates of deposit and money market
funds.
The
effective income tax rate at March 31, 2010 and 2009 was 26.9% and 31.8%,
respectively. The effective tax rate is less than the statutory tax
rate mainly due to the benefit the Company receives on its Qualified Production
Activities and the benefit derived from the ESOP dividends paid on allocated
shares.
Net
income for the three months ended March 31, 2010, was $808,723 or $.38 per
share, both basic and diluted, compared to $781,272 or $.37 per share, both
basic and diluted, for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Net
income for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, was $2,315,657 or $1.09 and
$1.08 per share, basic and diluted, respectively, compared to $1,137,155 or $.54
per share, both basic and diluted, for the nine months ended March 31,
2009. The increase in net income per share was primarily due to higher gross profit
on sales offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses and
decreased interest income.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company's working capital is an appropriate indicator of the liquidity of its
business, and during the past three fiscal years, the Company, when possible,
has funded all of its operations with cash flows resulting from operating
activities and when necessary from its existing cash and investments. The
Company did not borrow any funds during the last three fiscal
years.
The
Company's working capital as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $24.5
million and $24.1 million, respectively. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company repurchased 0 and 14,350 shares,
respectively, of its common stock for a total purchase price of $0 and $209,035,
respectively. Of the total purchases, 0 shares and 10,699 shares,
respectively, were purchased from the Company's Employee Retirement Plan and
Trust ("ESOP") for a purchase price of $0 and $157,222,
respectively. All remaining shares were purchased on the open
market. During the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the
Company repurchased 23,513 and 19,899 shares, respectively, of its common stock
for a total purchase price of $452,155 and $311,545, respectively. Of
the total purchases, 23,513 shares and 11,499 shares, respectively, were
purchased from the Company's Employee Retirement Plan and Trust ("ESOP") for a
purchase price of $452,155 and $171,662, respectively. All remaining
shares were purchased on the open market. Under existing
authorizations from the Company's Board of Directors, as of March 31, 2010,
management is authorized to purchase an additional $1,236,300 million of Company
stock.
Nine
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$ | 3,934,537 | $ | (554,444 | ) | |||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,789,165 | ) | (722,280 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(3,557,743 | ) | (4,722,830 | ) |
Net cash
provided by operating activities fluctuates between periods primarily as a
result of differences in net income, the timing of the collection of accounts
receivable, purchase of inventory, level of sales and payment of accounts
payable. Net
cash used in investing activities increased in the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 due to increased
purchases, net of maturities, of short term investments and property plant and
equipment during the period. The decrease in cash
used in financing activities is due primarily to a decrease in the dividends on
common stock.
The
Company currently believes that the cash flow generated from operations and when
necessary, from cash and cash equivalents, will be sufficient to meet its
long-term funding requirements for the foreseeable future.
10
During
the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company expended
$386,029 and $211,952, respectively, for plant improvements and new
equipment. The Company has budgeted approximately $450,000 for new equipment and
plant improvements in fiscal 2010. Management anticipates that the
funds required will be available from current operations.
The
Company at certain times enters into standby letters of credit agreements with
financial institutions primarily relating to the guarantee of future performance
on certain contracts. Contingent liabilities on outstanding standby
letters of credit agreements aggregated to zero at March 31, 2010 and March 31,
2009.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE
SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This
report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The terms "believe,"
"anticipate," "intend," "goal," "expect," and similar expressions may identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
represent the Company's current expectations or beliefs concerning future
events. The matters covered by these statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, including the
Company's dependence on timely development, introduction and customer acceptance
of new products, the impact of competition and price erosion, supply and
manufacturing constraints, potential new orders from customers and other risks
and uncertainties. The foregoing list should not be construed as
exhaustive, and the Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated
events. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
made.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The
Company is a smaller reporting company as defined under Securities and Exchange
Commission Rule 12b-2. Pursuant to the exemption available to smaller reporting
company issuers under Item 305 of Regulation S-K, quantitative and qualitative
disclosures about market risk, the Company is not required to provide the
information for this item.
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
(a) The
Company's management, with the participation of the Company's chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the
end of the period covered by this report.
(b) There
have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during
the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
11
PART
II: Other Information and Signatures
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
None
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
(a)
|
None
|
|
(c)
|
Securities
Repurchased - None
|
|
Item
3
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
|
None
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
None
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
|
None
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and
15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
12
S I G N A
T U R E S
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
ESPEY
MFG. & ELECTRONICS CORP.
|
|
/s/
Mark St. Pierre
|
|
Mark
St. Pierre, President and
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
/s/
David O'Neil
|
|
David
O'Neil, Treasurer and
|
|
Principal
Financial Officer
|
May 12, 2010
Date
13