ETHEMA HEALTH Corp - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its charter)
Colorado
|
84-1227328
|
(State or other
|
(I.R.S. Employer of
|
jurisdiction of incorporation
|
Incorporation
|
Identification No.)
|
Identification No.)
|
5734 Yonge Street, Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario, Canada (416) 222-5501
(Address of principal executive offices) (issuer's phone number)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered under Section
12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year totaled: $1,678,804 Documents Incorporated by Reference: None
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes___. No. X
As of December 31, 2011, the Registrant had outstanding no shares of Convertible Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value issued and outstanding.
Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding $.01 par value as of December 31, 2010, 13,521,568
1
3 | ||
5 | ||
5 | ||
5 | ||
5 | ||
|
||
5 | ||
6 | ||
6 | ||
8 | ||
9 | ||
27 | ||
27 | ||
28 | ||
30 | ||
30 | ||
30 | ||
31 | ||
32 | ||
|
33 |
2
Nova Nova Natural Resources Corporation (“Nova” or “the Registrant” or “the Company”) was incorporated under Colorado law on April 1, 1993 and is the surviving company of a merger, effective February 1, 1995, of the Company and Nova Natural Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation. The merger was effected to change the Company's domicile from Delaware to Colorado and caused no change in the Company's capitalization. The Delaware Corporation was the successor to Nova Petroleum Corporation and Power Resources Corporation, which merged in 1986. Prior to that merger, Nova Petroleum Corporation and Power Resources Corporation operated since 1979 and 1972, respectively.
Significant changes in the Company business
On March 29, 2010 the company entered into an agreement with Greenestone Clinic Inc. (“Greenestone”), a private Canadian corporation, whereby it would provide consulting services to for the development and operation of medical clinics in the province of Ontario, Canada. The term of the agreement was for one year whereby Greenestone would provide both the medical and business expertise in the initial startup of private clinics. Greenestone would provide the technical assistance to ensure the clinics complied with governmental policy and procedure requirements and the necessary detailed operational requirements to operate the clinics. At the time of entering into this agreement, Greenestone had an operational facility with some services Nova plans to offer in its first Ontario facility.
On May 15, 2010 Nova secured, through its wholly-owned subsidiary 1816191 Ontario Ltd., (“1816191”)), a sublease of space (which was previously used by a medical clinic) of approximately 8,000 square feet with a term until July 31, 2013 and secured funding for the $75,000 lease deposit. This location at 5734 Yonge Street, Toronto became the Company’s Head Office and Nova commenced operations in the month of June 2010. Nova offers various medical services such as endoscopy, cardiology, counciling, coaching, and executive health assessment programs.
On May 25, 2010, the Board of Directors unanimously resolved that Dr. Luke Fazio MD CM FRCSC be elected to the Board of Directors of Nova Natural Resources Corporation and serve for one year unless reelected for a longer term. Dr. Luke Fazio, 35, completed his medical school training at McGill University in Montreal in 1999.
On May 25, 2010, Mr. Nick Laroche, Director of Nova Natural Resources Corporation resigned and the Board of Directors accepted his resignation.
On November 29, 2010, Mr. Wayne A. Doss, Director of the company placed the name of Shawn Leon, forward for nomination to the Board of Directors of Nova and appointment to the position of President. The Board of Directors unanimously resolved that Mr. Shawn Leon be elected to the Board of Directors and be appointed President of Nova Natural Resources Corporation and serve for one year as Director unless reelected for a longer term. Mr. Doss will continue to serve as the Company Chief Executive Officer.
Shawn Leon, 52, Graduated with Honors in Business Administration, Wilfrid Laurier University in 1982. Mr. Leon has a diversity of experience in many business enterprises such as; real estate development and construction, and experience in private and public companies. Mr. Leon has held various managerial and owner positions in these companies which have included; IT, Communications, Industrial Minerals,Mining, Oil and Gas exploration, Dimensional Stone Manufacturing, Aggregates, Hospitality, and Medical Services.
In March 2011, Greenestone, a consultant to the Company offered to give up premises in Bala, Ontario previously leased by Greenestone and operated as a private medical resort and also allowed the company to use the Greenestone name. The company though a wholly owned subsidiary, Greenestone Clinc Muskoka Inc. (“Greenestone Muskoka”) entered into a new lease with the owner of the Bala, Ontario property to operate a mental health and addiction treatment center at the property. The owner of the property is a company wholly owned by the president of Nova. The lease is a five year lease with renewal options at the end of the first and second years of the five year term. The lease is a net lease and the company has a non-disturbance agreement from the mortgage lenders on the property for the whole term. The company has an option to purchase the property at any time during the term of the lease at appraised values. Greenestone Muskoka purchased all of the assets of Greenestone that were used for the operation of the Bala property. The new subsidiary Greenestone Muskoka would operate all private medical services provided to clients of the Company including private executive medicals, coaching, counciling, and addiction treatment.
3
On April 1, 2011 Dr. Susan K. Blank, of Atlanta, Georgia was hired to start up and run the addiction treatment center. Dr. Paul Garfinkel, Dr. Clive Chamberlain, Dr. Greg O’Donahue and Janice Harris R.N. all formed the Clinical Advisory Group of the Company to assist and direct Dr. Blank in her duties.
The Bala facility was ready to start treating clients in July 2011 and started to take clients in August, 2011. The last five months of 2011 saw a varying number of clients enter treatment and the company was very successfully treating clients throughout this start-up phase. The Company experienced operational losses during all of this start-up phase.
On April 14, 2011, Shawn Leon, President and Director of the company placed the name of Michael Howlett forward for nomination to the Board of Directors of the company. The Board of Directors unanimously resolved that Michael Howlett be elected to the Board of Directors of Nova Natural Resources Corporation and serve for one year unless reelected for a longer term.
Michael Howlett 61, brings more than three decades of experience in the private sector. His background includes a long and distinguished career with the Preston Group of Companies that culminated in his role as Chair and CEO, responsible for strategic planning, operations and mergers and acquisitions.
When acquired by OE Canon, Mr. Howlett dedicated his attention to helping re-shape the not-for-profit sectors. His work with the Canadian Diabetes Association as President and CEO led the organization to national and international recognition through its research, education programs and influence in changing public policy. In 2008, he accepted an invitation from the Government of Canada to direct the two-year launch of the Mental Health Commission and created the financial, strategic and operational framework that would support its ten-year mandate to generate awareness and understanding of mental health.
Now, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Carmichael & Holmes Inc., he consults to a number of businesses throughout Canada and the United States, as well as in England and Europe. His focus is maximizing an organization’s potential to ensure profitability and growth. He brings extensive experience in the development, management and re-engineering of both start-up and established organizations in a broad range of sectors.
On April 14, 2011, Wayne A Doss, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Nova Natural Resources Corporation resigned and the Board of Directors accepted the resignation. Mr. Doss left to focus on other business opportunities. Mr. Shawn Leon was elected to the office of Chief Executive Officer on April 14, 2011.
In August 2011, the Company’s 1816191 Ontario Ltd. subsidiary entered into an agreement with the Albany Clinic to manage and run the endoscopy unit in its medical building at 807 Broadview Avenue in Toronto. Under new regulations passed in 2010 in Ontario, an approval from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (“CPSO”) to inspect and approve this facility prior to the commencement of procedures there was necessary. This was completed and approved in December 2011 and procedures started in January 2012 in this facility.
In March 2012, the Company entered into a lease for premises at 39 Hazelton Avenue in Toronto, Ontario for the operation of an aftercare and intensive out-patient addiction treatment program. Operations are scheduled to start on April 2, 2012.
For all of fiscal 2011, over 2,200 endoscopy procedures were performed giving rise to gross revenue of $1,160,284, substantially all of which was earned from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (“OHIP”). As amounts owing from OHIP are backed by the government of Ontario, we see very little credit risk attributable to revenues billed to or owing from OHIP.
In the last half of 2011 contributions to revenue from Greenestone Muskoka were $297,691 the vast majority of which were from the fees charged to those in the addiction treatment center. The revenue for the treatment center is collected on admission , or shortly after admission which gives the Company little risk in collecting the revenue from these clients.
4
Employees
At December 31, 2011, Nova had approximately 49 employees in its two divisions not including Doctors. Two management employees were split between the two subsidiaries. There were 12 employees working for the 1816191 Ontario Ltd. subsidiary and 37 employees working for its Greenestone Muskoka subsidiary.
Environmental Regulations
The Company is not currently subject to any pending administrative or judicial enforcement proceedings arising under environmental laws or regulations. Environmental laws and regulations may be adopted in the future which may have an impact upon the Company's operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The executive offices of the Company are located at 5734 Yonge Street, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2M 4E7. The space is approximately 8,000 sq ft. and takes up the entire third floor of the building. The building is right next to the Finch subway station and commuter bus terminal. This facility is leased by the 1816191 Ontario Ltd. subsidiary and the primary activity at this facility are endoscopy procedures. This facility also has executive offices and employees of the Greenestone Muskoka subsidiary are working form this space.
The treatment facility is in Bala, Ontario at 3571 Highway 169. The property is 43 acres in size and contains approximately 48,000 square feet of buildings. The property is leased from Cranberry Cove Holdings Ltd. a company owned by the President of Nova. The lease is a five year lease with renewal options at the end of the first and second years of the five year term. The lease is a net lease and the company has a non-disturbance agreement from the mortgage lenders on the property for the whole term. The company has an option to purchase the property at any time during the term of the lease at appraised values with a minimum purchase value of $4.5 million dollars and a maximum purchase value of $8.0 million dollars during the first two years of the term and $10.0 million dollars during the last three years of the term.
The leased facilities at 807 Broadview Avenue in Toronto are approximately 1,000 square feet in size. This building was built new in 2010 and is known as the Albany Clinic. This lease is based on usage for the facility and requires the Company to pay rent only on days that it uses the facility with a minimum use of one day per week.
The subsidiary 1816191 Ontario Ltd. received notice during the first quarter of 2011 from an individual that suffered a perforated colon during a colonoscopy procedure that they intended to litigate against the 1816191 Ontario Inc. and the Doctor that performed the colonoscopy. The insurer for the doctor and the Company were notified and there has since been no claim filed during the year or subsequent to year end.
The Company's Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "NVNJ" at December 31, 2011 with no trading activity. The company was sponsored by the market maker Wilson Davis & Co. from Salt Lake City Utah which filed a 15C211 application for the Company in 2011. This application was approved by FINRA in February 2012 and Wilson Davis & Co. first quoted the stock in March 2012. The number of record holders of the Company's Common Stock as of December 31, 2011 was approximately 130 in certificate holders.
5
On 13 August 2003 the shareholders of Nova Natural Resources Corp., by majority consent authorized the Board of Directors to institute a 1 for 3000 reverse stock split with no fractional shares to be issued. Nova, a Colorado Corporation required two thirds majority for such action. The majority consent was approved by two hundred two million one hundred sixth four thousand (202,164,000) votes and constituted an approval in excess of the two thirds required. The board approved the reverse and set the effective date for August 22, 2003. Further, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to increase the common stock authorized and issued to 50,000,000 shares following the implementation of the reverse.
The Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The company intends to employ its cash flow and earnings, if any, for working capital needs.
Shareholders
The number of record holders shown on the share register of the Company's Transfer Agents as of December 31, 2011 was 130. The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation held 16,989 shares for an undisclosed number of shareholders as of December 31, 2011.
Dividends
To date, the Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock, nor does it anticipate that it will pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon the Company's earnings and its cash requirements at that time.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
As of fiscal 2011, no securities were authorized for issuance under compensation plans previously approved by security holders. As of fiscal 2011, no securities were authorized for issuance under compensation plans not previously approved by security holders.
Equity Securities Issuances During Fiscal 2011
In September, 2011 the Board of Directors approved the conversion of a Convertible Note Payable in the amount of $170,000.00 to convert at .02 per share for the issuance of eight million five hundred thousand shares (8,500,000) of rule-144 restricted common stock.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A) for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2011 compared with the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 provides readers with an overview of the operations of Nova. The MD&A provides information that the management of Nova believes is important to access and understand the results of operations and the financial condition of the Company.
Our objective is to present readers with a view of Nova through the eyes of management.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Nova's financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010.
6
About Nova Natural Resources Corporation
Nova has been a business in transition since the divesture of the electronic business. Management has reviewed many business opportunities but has passed on those that did not ensure the company with free and clear assets and exclusive protection of the opportunity. On March 29, 2010 the company entered into an agreement with Greenestone whereby it would provide consulting services to Nova for the development and operation of medical clinics in the province of Ontario, Canada. The Company began operations in June 2010.
The Company operated its endoscopy unit for the whole year in 2011 but only operated the endoscopy unit from June to December in 2010. Comparisons on a year over year basis do not measure equal time periods. 2010 was a start up year for the endoscopy unit. Results for 2011 were sales of $1,160,284 in 12 months compared to sales of $191,207 for six months in 2010. There has been a steady increase in business volume from the start of the operation. At the end of 2011 the endoscopy unit at 5734 Yonge Street was still only operating at 25% of its capacity. The endoscopy unit will continue to grow and become more profitable with volume. Most of the cost to run the endoscopy unit are variable with volume. The rent is fixed, rising only slightly year to year and some management overhead is fixed. These costs are therefore reducing as a percentage of volume as this business continues to grow.
For all of fiscal 2010, 337 endoscopy procedures were performed giving rise to gross revenue of $191,207, substantially all of which was earned from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (“OHIP”). As amounts owing from OHIP are backed by the government of Ontario, we see very little credit risk attributable to revenues billed to or owing from OHIP. For fiscal 2011 over 2,250 procedures were performed giving rise to $1,160,284 in revenue.
Key components of operating expenses for the endoscopy unit during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows:
-payments to doctors performing services: in general, the doctor performing the actual medical procedure will receive 60% of the amounts we receive from OHIP as payment for the procedure performed; included in Cost of Sales for 2011 is $648,772 of such amounts owing to doctors
-management fees of $34,000,
-salaries and wages (primarily) to medical support staff (e.g. nurses, technicians, etc.) in the amount of $196,107
-premises rent of $185,982, and
-professional and management fees to third-party executive level service providers (in Canada) of $69,211
There was no revenue produced in 2010 for the private medical business and this revenue started in June of 2011. Total revenue for the period from June to December of 2011 was $518,520. This revenue grew steadily during the period.
Key components of operating expenses during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows:
-management fees of $427,895
-salaries and wages in the amount of $1,336,569
-premises rent of $278,428 and
-professional and management fees to third-party executive level service providers (in Canada) of $365,586
The Company had an extraordinary event in 2011. There is rental income of $221,206 that was realized when another treatment center operator was unable to maintain its occupancy in its facility. The Company received rental income for a period of 70 days while the other treatment center operator occupied some of the premises at the Bala location.
Management's discussion of anticipated future operations contains predictions and projections which may constitute forward looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including provisions contained in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the Company's actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of the Company's business include, but are not limited to, the following:
7
Forward-looking Information
This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. For this purpose any statements contained in this Form 10-K which is not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as "may", "will", "expect", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", or "continue" or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of which are not within the Company's control.
8
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
CONTENTS
Page
|
||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
10
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
11
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
|
12
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
13
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
14
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
15 – 26
|
9
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders of:
Nova Natural Resources Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Nova Natural Resources Corporation as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Nova Natural Resources Corporation as of December 31, 2011, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in consolidated financial statement Note 2, the Company has incurred losses since inception. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to meet its obligations and to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
The comparative December 31, 2010 figures have been audited by another firm of licensed public accountants.
“Jarvis Ryan Associates”
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
March 30, 2012
10
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||
December 31,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | - | $ | 48,376 | ||||
Accounts receivable
|
188,423 | 40,907 | ||||||
Harmonized sales tax receivable
|
5,933 | - | ||||||
Prepaid expenses
|
83,724 | 52,436 | ||||||
Inventory
|
11,784 | 10,965 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
289,864 | 152,684 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation (note 6)
|
641,052 | 342,695 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 930,916 | $ | 495,379 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current liabilities
|
||||||||
Bank indebtedness
|
$ | 28,281 | $ | 15 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
632,497 | 298,529 | ||||||
Withholding taxes payable
|
270,118 | - | ||||||
Deferred revenue
|
116,692 | - | ||||||
Convertible notes payable (note 7)
|
2,498,975 | 445,601 | ||||||
Related party notes (note 8)
|
330,302 | 404,895 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
3,876,865 | 1,149,040 | ||||||
Stockholders' deficit
|
||||||||
Common stock; $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized; 13,521,568 shares issued and outstanding
|
||||||||
(note 10)
|
135,216 | 50,218 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
5,716,666 | 5,631,664 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
21,718 | (12,855 | ) | |||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(8,819,549 | ) | (6,322,688 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' deficit
|
(2,945,949 | ) | (653,661 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ | 930,916 | $ | 495,379 | ||||
Commitments (note 11)
|
||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
||||||||
Subject to Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 30, 2012
|
11
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Additional Paid
in Capital
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
8,071,764 | $ | 80,718 | $ | 5,622,164 | $ | - | $ | (5,801,382 | ) | $ | (98,500 | ) | |||||||||||
Adjustment
|
- | - | - | - | (30 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock rescinded
|
(4,000,000 | ) | (40,000 | ) | - | - | - | (40,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for convertible note
|
950,000 | 9,500 | 9,500 | - | - | 19,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2008
|
- | - | - | - | (14,289 | ) | (14,289 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
5,021,764 | 50,218 | 5,631,664 | - | (5,815,701 | ) | (133,819 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2009
|
- | - | - | (39,719 | ) | (39,719 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
5,021,764 | 50,218 | 5,631,664 | - | (5,855,420 | ) | (173,538 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
- | - | - | (12,855 | ) | - | (12,855 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2010
|
- | - | - | - | (467,268 | ) | (467,268 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
5,021,764 | 50,218 | 5,631,664 | (12,855 | ) | (6,322,688 | ) | (653,661 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued for convertible note
|
8,500,000 | 85,000 | 85,000 | - | - | 170,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
- | - | - | 34,573 | - | 34,573 | ||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
|
(196 | ) | (2 | ) | 2 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2011
|
- | - | - | - | (2,496,861 | ) | (2,496,861 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011
|
13,521,568 | $ | 135,216 | $ | 5,716,666 | $ | 21,718 | $ | (8,819,549 | ) | $ | (2,945,949 | ) | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject to Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 30, 2012
|
12
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 1,678,804 | $ | 191,207 | ||||
Cost of services provided
|
648,773 | 118,894 | ||||||
Gross margin
|
1,030,031 | 72,313 | ||||||
Operating expenses
|
||||||||
Continuing education
|
7,049 | 6,067 | ||||||
Depreciation
|
129,766 | 51,229 | ||||||
General and administrative
|
536,715 | 61,629 | ||||||
Management fees (note 8)
|
461,895 | - | ||||||
Meals and entertainment
|
1,462 | 10,300 | ||||||
Medical records
|
81,139 | 22,556 | ||||||
Professional fees
|
434,804 | 179,127 | ||||||
Rent (note 8)
|
465,035 | 84,509 | ||||||
Salaries and wages
|
1,532,678 | 90,656 | ||||||
Subcontract fees
|
9,386 | - | ||||||
Supplies
|
72,076 | - | ||||||
Travel
|
16,093 | 33,251 | ||||||
Total operating expenses
|
3,748,098 | 539,324 | ||||||
(2,718,067 | ) | (467,011 | ) | |||||
Other income (expense)
|
||||||||
Rental income
|
221,206 | - | ||||||
Interest expense
|
- | (257 | ) | |||||
Total other income (expense)
|
221,206 | (257 | ) | |||||
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
$ | (2,496,861 | ) | $ | (467,268 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
34,573 | (12,855 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive loss
|
$ | (2,462,288 | ) | $ | (480,123 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
$ | (0.34 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
7,443,626 | 5,021,764 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
||||||||
Subject to Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 30, 2012
|
13
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
||||||||
Year Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Operating activities
|
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (2,496,861 | ) | $ | (467,268 | ) | ||
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
129,766 | 51,229 | ||||||
(2,367,095 | ) | (416,039 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(147,516 | ) | (39,704 | ) | ||||
Harmonized sales tax receivable
|
(5,933 | ) | - | |||||
Prepaid expenses
|
(31,288 | ) | (50,894 | ) | ||||
Inventory
|
(819 | ) | (10,643 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
333,967 | 279,392 | ||||||
Withholding taxes payable
|
270,118 | - | ||||||
Deferred revenue
|
116,692 | - | ||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(1,831,874 | ) | (237,888 | ) | ||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||
Purchase of fixed assets
|
(428,122 | ) | (383,844 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
(428,122 | ) | (383,844 | ) | ||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds from bank indebtedness
|
28,266 | 15 | ||||||
Proceeds from convertible notes payable
|
2,053,374 | 433,230 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
84,998 | - | ||||||
Proceeds from additional paid-in capital
|
85,002 | - | ||||||
(Advances to) proceeds from related party notes
|
(74,593 | ) | 230,784 | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
2,177,047 | 664,029 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
34,573 | 529 | ||||||
Net change in cash
|
(48,376 | ) | 42,826 | |||||
Beginning cash balance
|
48,376 | 5,550 | ||||||
Ending cash balance
|
$ | - | $ | 48,376 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 26,918 | $ | - | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
|
||||||||
Subject to Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 30, 2012
|
14
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 1 - Nature of business
Nova Natural Resources Corporation (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the state of Colorado, USA, on April 1, 1993. As at December 31, 2011, the Company owns 100% of the outstanding shares of each of 1816191 Ontario Limited and Greenestone Clinic Muskoka Inc., both of which were incorporated in 2010 under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. 1816191 Ontario Limited and Greenestone Clinic Muskoka Inc. provide medical services to various patients in clinics located in two regions in Ontario, Canada; the city of Toronto and the regional municipality of Muskoka. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("US GAAP").
Note 2 – Going concern
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations in the normal course of business. As at December 31, 2011, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $3,587,001 (2010 deficiency of $996,356) and accumulated deficit of $8,819,549 (2010 accumulated deficit of $6,322,688). Accordingly, the Company will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of common stock, and, or debt financing in order to implement its business plan. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful with future financing ventures, and the inability to secure such financing may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue operations.
Note 3 - Significant accounting policies
The accounting policies of the Company are in accordance with US GAAP applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year. Outlined below are those policies considered particularly significant.
Principals of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its two subsidiaries, as noted in note 1. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation.
The Company’s subsidiaries functional currency is the Canadian dollar (CAD), while the Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar (USD). All transactions initiated in Canadian dollars are translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with ASC 830, "Foreign Currency Translation" as follows:
i) Monetary assets and liabilities at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date.
ii) Equity at historical rates.
iii) Revenue and expense items at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period.
Adjustments arising from such translations are deferred until realization and are included as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit as a component of other comprehensive income or loss. Therefore, translation adjustments are not included in determining net income (loss) but reported as other comprehensive income.
For foreign currency transactions, the Company translates these amounts to the Company’s functional currency at the exchange rate effective on the invoice date. If the exchange rate changes between the time of purchase and the time actual payment is made, a foreign exchange transaction gain or loss results which is included in determining net income for the period.
15
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 3 - Significant accounting policies (cont’d)
Revenue recognition
There are several main streams of revenue for the Company.
Revenue recognized in 1816191 Ontario Limited occurs when the service is provided to the patient, at which time title to the service, significant risks of ownership have passed and ultimate collection is reasonably assured.
Revenue recognized in Greenestone Clinic Muskoka Inc. occurs proportionately over the term of the patients’ treatment, at which time title to the service, significant risks of ownership and ultimate collection is reasonably assured. Customer deposits represents monies held by the Company from when the patients become admitted to treatment and are fully refunded, less any patients personal withdrawals during the time of treatment, at the time of discharge. Deferred revenue represents monies deposited by the patients for future services to be provided by the Company. Such monies will be recognized into revenue as the patient progresses through their treatment term.
Rental income is recognized when on a straight-line basis over the term of the rental period, at which time title to the service, significant risks of ownership and ultimate collection is reasonably assured.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recognition, measurement and disclosure of amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The reported amounts, including revenue recognized in Greenestone Clinic Muskoka Inc., depreciation, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory, furniture and equipment additions, deferred revenue and note disclosures are determined using management's best estimates based on assumptions that reflect the most probable set of economic conditions and planned courses of action. Actual results will differ from such estimates.
Non-monetary transactions
The Company’s policy is to measure an asset exchanged or transferred in a non-monetary transaction at the more reliably measurable of the fair value of the asset given up and the fair value of the asset received, unless:
i)
|
The transaction lacks commercial substance;
|
ii)
|
The transaction is an exchange of a product or property held for sale in the ordinary course of business for a product or property to be sold in the same line of business to facilitate sales to customers other than the parties to the exchange;
|
iii)
|
Neither the fair value of the asset received nor the fair value of the asset given up is reliably measurable; or
|
iv)
|
The transaction is a non-monetary non-reciprocal transfer to owners that represents a spin-off or other form of restructuring or liquidation.
|
Cash
The Company's policy is to disclose bank balances under cash, including bank overdrafts with balances that fluctuate frequently from being positive to overdrawn and term deposits with a maturity period of three months or less from the date of acquisition. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2011.
16
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 3 - Significant accounting policies (cont’d)
Financial instruments
The Company initially measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value, except for certain non-arm's length transactions. The Company subsequently measures all its financial assets and financial liabilities at amortized cost.
Financial assets measured at amortized cost include cash, accounts receivable and harmonized sales tax receivable. Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost include bank indebtedness, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, withholding taxes payable, convertible notes payable and related party notes.
Financial assets measured at cost are tested for impairment when there are indicators of impairment. The amount of the write-down is recognized in net income. The previously recognized impairment loss may be reversed to the extent of the improvement, directly or by adjusting the allowance account, provided it is no greater than the amount that would have been reported at the date of the reversal had the impairment not been recognized previously. The amount of the reversal is recognized in net income.
The Company recognizes its transaction costs in net income in the period incurred. However, financial instruments that will not be subsequently measured at fair value are adjusted by the transaction costs that are directly attributable to their origination, issuance or assumption.
FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Company does not have assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2011. The Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Depreciation is calculated on the declining balance method at the following annual rates:
Computer equipment
|
30 | % | ||
Computer software
|
100 | % | ||
Furniture and equipment
|
30 | % | ||
Medical equipment
|
25 | % |
Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the term of the lease. Half rates are used for all fixed assets in the year of acquisition.
17
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 3 - Significant accounting policies (cont’d)
Income taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method, future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities. Any change in the net amount of future income tax assets and liabilities is included in income. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on enacted or substantively enacted tax rates and laws which are expected to apply to the Company's taxable income for the periods in which the assets and liabilities will be recovered. Future income tax assets are recognized when it is more likely than not that they will be realized.
Earnings per share information
FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” provides for calculation of "basic" and "diluted" earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Basic and diluted loss per share was the same, at the reporting dates, as there were no common stock equivalents outstanding.
Share based expenses
ASC 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation" codified SFAS No. 123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based payments award to employees, including employee stock options, restricted stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights that may be classified as either equity or liabilities. The Company should determine if a present obligation to settle the share-based payment transaction in cash or other assets exists. A present obligation to settle in cash or other assets exists if: (a) the option to settle by issuing equity instruments lacks commercial substance or (b) the present obligation is implied because of an entity's past practices or stated policies. If a present obligation exists, the transaction should be recognized as a liability; otherwise, the transaction should be recognized as equity.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50 "Equity - Based Payments to Non-Employees" which codified SFAS 123 and the Emerging Issues Task Force consensus in Issue No. 96-18 ("EITF 96-18"), "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services". Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable:
(a) the goods or services received; or (b) the equity instruments issued. The fair value of the share-based payment transaction should be determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.
Note 4 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or “FASB,” issued new guidance on the disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The new guidance enhances disclosures required by U.S. GAAP by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments. The new guidance is to be adopted for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The new guidance is to be retrospectively applied for all comparative periods presented. The Company does not expect adoption of the new guidance to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on testing goodwill for impairment with the intention to reduce complexity and costs. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect adoption of the new guidance to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
18
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 4 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (cont’d)
In July 2011, the FASB issued new guidance on the presentation and disclosure of patient service revenue, provision for bad debts, and the allowance for doubtful accounts for certain health care entities. The guidance requires certain health care entities to change the presentation of their statement of operations by reclassifying the provision for bad debts associated with patient service revenue from an operating expense to a deduction from patient service revenue. Additionally, those health care entities are required to provide enhanced disclosure about the policies for recognizing revenue and assessing bad debts. The amendments also require disclosures of patient service revenue as well as qualitative and quantitative information about changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim period periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Upon adoption of this standard, the presentation of the Company’s statement of operations will change however net income will not.
In May 2011, FASB issued new guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This new guidance amends current fair value measurement and disclosure guidance to include increased transparency around valuation inputs and investment categorization. This new guidance is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect adoption of the new guidance to have a material impact the consolidated financial statements.
Note 5 – Financial instruments
The Company is exposed to various risks through its financial instruments. The following analysis provides a measure of the Company's risk exposure and concentrations at the balance sheet date, December 31, 2011:
(a)
|
Credit risk
|
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash, accounts receivable and bank indebtedness.
|
|
Credit risk associated with cash and bank indebtedness is minimized by ensuring these financial assets and liabilities are placed with financial institutions with high credit ratings.
|
|
With respect to accounts receivable, concentration of credit risk is minimal as the Company receives all of its revenues from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, a provincially regulated program. Allowances are provided for potential losses that have been incurred at the balance sheet date.
|
|
(b)
|
Liquidity risk
|
Liquidity risk is the risk the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company is subject to this risk given its working capital deficiency of $3,587,001 and accumulated deficit of $8,819,549. As disclosed in note 2, the Company will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital in order to implement its business plant. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful with future financing ventures, and the inability to secure such financing may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.
|
19
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 5 – Financial instruments (cont’d)
(c)
|
Market risk
|
|
Market risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises three types of risk: interest rate risk, currency risk, and other price risk. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk and currency risk.
|
||
i.
|
Interest rate risk
|
|
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its bank indebtedness as these liabilities are based on floating rates of interest.
|
||
ii.
|
Currency risk
|
|
Currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company is subject to currency risk as its subsidiaries operate in Canada and are subject to fluctuations in the Canadian dollar. The Company is exposed to currency risk through cash, accounts receivable, harmonized sales taxes receivable, bank indebtedness, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, withholding taxes payable, convertible notes payable and related party notes denominated in Canadian dollars. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recognized a gain of $34,573 on foreign exchange (2010 had a loss of $12,855). Based on the net exposures at December 31, 2011, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar would result in an approximate $10,000 increase or decrease in the Company’s after-tax net earnings, respectively. The Company has not entered into any hedging agreements to mediate this risk.
|
||
iii.
|
Other price risk
|
|
Other price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices (other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer, or factors affecting all similar financial instruments traded in the market. The Company is not exposed to this risk.
|
Note 6 –Fixed assets
Net Book Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
December 31,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Computer equipment
|
$ | 12,876 | $ | 966 | $ | 11,910 | $ | 228,930 | ||||||||
Computer software
|
19,086 | 4,771 | 14,315 | 47,737 | ||||||||||||
Furniture and equipment
|
368,296 | 46,014 | 322,282 | - | ||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements
|
92,554 | 31,201 | 61,353 | - | ||||||||||||
Medical equipment
|
329,144 | 97,952 | 231,192 | 66,028 | ||||||||||||
$ | 821,956 | $ | 180,904 | $ | 641,052 | $ | 342,695 |
20
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 7 – Convertible notes payable
The notes are convertible at the option of the holder up to the maturity date; any convertible debentures still outstanding as at their maturity date will automatically convert into common stock of the Company. The Company has adequate common shares in its treasury to cover the conversions if all notes are exercised.
The Company has the following convertible notes outstanding.
Note
|
Amount
|
Issuance Date
|
Conversion
Price in USD
|
Number of
Shares
|
Effect on
Dilution
|
Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||||
1 | $ | 50,500 |
April 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.01 | 5,050,000 | 21.32 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
2 | 25,000 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
3 | 9,833 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 100,000 | 0.42 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
4 | 24,583 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
5 | 24,583 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
6 | 24,583 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
7 | 51,481 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 500,000 | 2.11 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
8 | 9,833 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 100,000 | 0.42 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
9 | 10,383 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 105,590 | 0.45 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
10 | 14,750 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 150,000 | 0.63 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
11 | 147,495 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 1,500,000 | 6.33 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
12 | 24,583 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
13 | 24,583 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
14 | 49,165 |
December 1, 2010
|
$ | 0.10 | 500,000 | 2.11 | % |
December 1, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
15 | 47,198 |
January 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 480,000 | 2.03 | % |
January 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
16 | 24,583 |
March 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 166,667 | 0.70 | % |
March 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
17 | 50,000 |
March 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 333,333 | 1.41 | % |
March 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
18 | 15,000 |
March 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 100,000 | 0.42 | % |
March 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
19 | 29,499 |
March 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 200,000 | 0.84 | % |
March 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
20 | 9,833 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 66,667 | 0.28 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
21 | 98,330 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 666,667 | 2.81 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
22 | 9,833 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 66,667 | 0.28 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
23 | 9,833 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 66,667 | 0.28 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
24 | 98,330 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 666,667 | 2.81 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
25 | 49,165 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 333,333 | 1.41 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
26 | 29,499 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 200,000 | 0.84 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
27 | 19,666 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 133,333 | 0.56 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
28 | 4,917 |
March 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 33,333 | 0.14 | % |
March 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
29 | 24,583 |
April 15, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 250,000 | 1.06 | % |
April 15, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
30 | 5,900 |
June 15, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 60,000 | 0.25 | % |
June 15, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
31 | 7,866 |
June 15, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 80,000 | 0.34 | % |
June 15, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
32 | 3,933 |
June 15, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 40,000 | 0.17 | % |
June 15, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
33 | 76,697 |
June 15, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 780,000 | 3.29 | % |
June 15, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
34 | 196,660 |
June 24, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 1,333,333 | 5.63 | % |
June 24, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||
35 | 29,499 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 200,000 | 0.84 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
*The actual number of shares issued if converted will vary depending on the exchange rate at time of conversion.
21
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 7 – Convertible notes payable (cont’d)
Note
|
Amount |
Issuance Date
|
Conversion
Price in USD
|
Number of
Shares
|
Effect on
Dilution
|
Maturity
|
||||||
36 | $ | 15,733 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 106,667 | 0.45 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
|||
37 | 31,466 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 213,333 | 0.90 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
38 | 64,898 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 440,000 | 1.86 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
39 | 58,998 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 400,000 | 1.69 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
40 | 68,831 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 466,667 | 1.97 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
41 | 14,258 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 96,667 | 0.41 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
42 | 147,495 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 1,000,000 | 4.22 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
43 | 49,165 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 333,333 | 1.41 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
44 | 142,579 |
June 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 966,667 | 4.08 | % |
June 30, 2013
|
||||
45 | 4,917 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 33,333 | 0.14 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
46 | 4,917 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 33,333 | 0.14 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
47 | 4,917 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 33,333 | 0.14 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
48 | 10,000 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 66,667 | 0.28 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
49 | 9,833 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 66,667 | 0.28 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
50 | 8,850 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 60,000 | 0.25 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
51 | 2,212 |
July 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 15,000 | 0.06 | % |
July 30, 2013
|
||||
52 | 4,917 |
August 26, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 33,333 | 0.14 | % |
August 26, 2013
|
||||
53 | 49,165 |
August 26, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 333,333 | 1.41 | % |
August 26, 2013
|
||||
54 | 49,165 |
October 26, 2011
|
$ | 0.10 | 500,000 | 2.11 | % |
October 26, 2013
|
||||
55 | 98,330 |
October 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 666,667 | 2.81 | % |
October 31, 2013
|
||||
56 | 68,831 |
November 24, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 466,667 | 1.97 | % |
November 24, 2013
|
||||
57 | 14,750 |
November 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 100,000 | 0.42 | % |
November 30, 2013
|
||||
58 | 14,750 |
November 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 100,000 | 0.42 | % |
November 30, 2013
|
||||
59 | 23,206 |
November 30, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 157,333 | 0.66 | % |
November 30, 2013
|
||||
60 | 25,160 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 167,733 | 0.71 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
61 | 19,666 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 133,333 | 0.56 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
62 | 9,833 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 66,667 | 0.28 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
63 | 44,249 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 300,000 | 1.27 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
64 | 49,165 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 333,333 | 1.41 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
65 | 19,666 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 133,333 | 0.56 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
66 | 14,750 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 100,000 | 0.42 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
67 | 22,124 |
December 31, 2011
|
$ | 0.15 | 150,000 | 0.63 | % |
December 31, 2013
|
||||
$ | 2,498,975 | 223,335,656 |
*The actual number of shares issued if converted will vary depending on the exchange rate at time of conversion.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 8,500,000 common shares from convertible notes payable at a conversion rate of $0.02 per share.
22
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 7 – Convertible notes payable (cont’d)
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued the following convertible debentures for cash consideration.
Series
|
Cash
Consideration
|
|||
Series C
|
$ | 1,075,000 | ||
Series F
|
$ | 170,000 | ||
Series H
|
$ | 50,000 |
These debentures bear no interest and are convertible into common shares of the Company at the rate of $0.15 per share between six months after their date of issuance and their maturity date of two years from their date of issuance. All convertible debentures still outstanding as at their date of maturity will automatically convert into common stock at the rate of $0.15 per share.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued the following convertible debentures in satisfaction of liabilities related to services provided to the Company.
Series
|
Liabilities Related
to Services
|
Conversion Price
in USD
|
||||||
Series B
|
$ | 219,000 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
Series D
|
$ | 78,000 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Series E
|
$ | 290,350 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Series F
|
$ | 122,660 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Series H
|
$ | 35,000 | $ | 0.15 |
These debentures bear no interest and are convertible into common shares of the Company at the above applicable rate per share on the convertible debentures between six months after their date of issuance and their maturity date of two years from their date of issuance. All convertible debentures still outstanding as at their date of maturity will automatically convert into common stock at the above applicable conversion rate.
Note 8 –Related party transactions
The balance owing to related party notes as at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is to Greenestone Clinic Inc. The Company is related to Greenestone Clinic Inc. as it is controlled by one of the Company’s directors. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company purchased $269,982 of furniture and equipment from Greenestone Clinic Inc. The transaction was measured at the exchange amount, being the fair market value of the furniture and equipment acquired.
The Company had management fees totaling $178,032 during the year ended December 31, 2011 (2010: $0) to the director for services which are included in management fees.
The Company entered into an agreement to lease premises from Cranberry Cove Holdings Ltd. at market terms. Cranberry Cove Holdings Ltd. is related to the Company by virtue of its shareholder being a director of the Company. Rent is measured at the exchange amount, being the fair market value to rent the premise (note 11).
The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and opportunities that, in the future, may result in potential conflicts of interest between the Company and their other business interest. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.
23
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 9 -Income taxes
Current or future U.S. federal income tax provision or benefits have not been provided for any of the periods presented because the Company has experienced operating losses since inception. Under ACS 740 “Income Taxes,” when it is more likely than not that a tax asset cannot be realized through future income the Company must allow for this future tax benefit. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the net future tax asset, consisting of net operating loss carry forwards, because management has determined that it is more likely than not that they will not earn income sufficient to realize the future tax assets during the carry forward period.
The Company has not taken a tax position that, if challenged, would have a material effect on the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, applicable under ACS 740. As a result of the adoption of ACS 740, the Company did not recognize any adjustment to the liability for uncertain tax position and therefore did not record any adjustment to the beginning balance of accumulated deficit on the balance sheet.
The component of the Company’s future tax asset as of December 31, 2011 is as follows:
December 31,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
||||||||
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
$ | 8,819,549 | $ | 6,322,688 | |||||
Valuation allowance
|
(8,819,549 | ) | (6,322,688 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | - | $ | - |
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the 35% statutory rate to the income tax recorded is as follows:
December 31,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
||||||||
Tax at statutory rate
|
$ | 873,901 | $ | 163,544 | |||||
Valuation allowance
|
(873,901 | ) | (163,544 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The Company did not pay any income taxes during the year ended December 31, 2011.
The net federal operating loss carry forwards expire as follows:
2023
|
$ | 5,855,420 | |||
2030
|
467,268 | ||||
2031
|
2,496,861 | ||||
$ | 8,819,549 |
The loss carry forwards may be limited upon the consummation of a business combination under IRC Section 381.
Note 10 -Stockholders’ deficit
Common stock
The authorized common stock of the Company consists of 50,000,000 shares with par value of $0.01. As of December 31, 2011 the Company had 13,521,568 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock issued and outstanding.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 8,500,000 common stock from convertible notes payable at a conversion rate of $0.02 per share.
24
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 10 -Stockholders’ deficit (cont’d)
Net loss per common share
Net loss per share is computed using the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each year is used to compute basic loss per share. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding unless common stock equivalent shares are anti-dilutive. Dilutive potential common shares are additional common shares that will be exercised. Basic net loss per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Note 11 – Commitments
The Company is committed under two non-cancellable operating lease agreements for rental of premises. The rental of premise agreement for the subsidiary, 1816191 Ontario Inc. expires July 31, 2013 and the premise agreement for the subsidiary, Greenestone Clinic Muskoka Inc. expires March 31, 2016 (note 8).
Future minimum annual payment requirements are as follows:
2012
|
$ | 690,277 | ||
2013
|
771,399 | |||
2014
|
648,978 | |||
2015
|
648,978 | |||
2016
|
162,245 | |||
|
$ | 2,921,877 |
Note 12 – Management of capital
The Company’s objectives of capital management are to safeguard its ability to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis. The Company defines capital as the total of its total assets less total liabilities.
The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in its economic environment and the risk characteristics of the Company’s assets. To effectively manage the Company’s capital requirements, the Company has in place a planning, budgeting and forecasting process to help determine the funds required to ensure the Company has the appropriate liquidity to meet its operating and growth objectives. The Company is dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of common stock, and, or debt financing to support its normal operating requirements. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful with future financing ventures, and the inability to secure such financing may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. At December 31, 2011, there was no externally imposed capital requirement to which the Company is subject and with which the Company has not complied.
Note 13 – Asset retirement obligations
As at December 31, 2011, the Company has no legal obligations associated with the retirement of its tangible long-lived assets that it is required to settle.
25
NOVA NATURAL RESOURCES CORPORATION
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
Note 14 – Subsequent events
Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2011, $175,371 of Series G convertible debentures were issued at a conversion price in USD of $0.20. The notes are convertible at the option of the holder between six months after their date of issuance and their maturity date of two years from their date of issuance. The convertible debentures still outstanding as at their date of maturity will automatically convert into common stock at $0.20 per common stock.
Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2011, Greenestone Clinic Muskoka Inc. entered into a non-cancellable operating lease agreement for rental of premise commencing March 1, 2012 and expiring April 30, 2013, with monthly payments of $10,500 plus applicable sales taxes.
Note 15 – Comparative figures
The presentation of certain amounts on the financial statements for the previous year has been changed to conform with the financial statement presentation adopted for 2011. The net loss for the previous year is not affected by this reclassification.
26
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the "Evaluation"), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures ("Disclosure Controls") as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our President has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
We have also evaluated our internal controls for financial reporting, and there have been no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to material affect, the internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could affect those controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our President and CEO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Rule 13a-15(f). The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
27
Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Our management made an internal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of 12/31/2011. In making this assessment, it used the experience of the President and CEO. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the internal control is ineffective since there is a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weakness relates to the lack of segregation of duties in financial reporting, as our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by the President and CEO with the assistance of a full time accounting professional. Our President does possess accounting expertise but our company does not have an audit committee. This weakness is due to the company's lack of working capital to hire additional staff. To remedy this material weakness, we intend to raise additional capital to engage another internal accountant to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual report.
The following table sets forth the names and ages of the member(s) of our Board of Directors and our executive officers and the positions held by each.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||||
Shawn E. Leon
|
52 |
President, CEO and Director
|
||||
Dr. Luke Fazio
|
35 |
Director
|
||||
Michael Howlett
|
65 |
Director
|
Mr. Leon was elected as president, and director in November 2010 and as CEO in April 2011.
Set forth below are descriptions of the background of the executive officers and directors of the Company and principal occupations for the past five years:
Shawn Leon, 52, Graduated with Honors in Business Administration, Wilfrid Laurier University in 1982. Mr. Leon has been an officer and Director of the Company since November of 2010. Prior to that Mr. Leon was the President of Greenestone Clinic Inc. since 2008. Mr Leon has also held the role of President of Leon Developments Ltd, Port Carling Inn Developments Ltd., 1871 at the Locks Developments Ltd. and JLeon Developments Ltd. since 2008, 2008, 2008 and 2006 respectively.
The President and Chief Executive Officer was appointed by the Board of Directors and holds office at the discretion of the Board.
Dr. Luke Fazio MD CM FRCSC has been a member of the Board of Directors of Nova Natural Resources Corporation since May of 2010. Dr. Luke Fazio, 35, completed his medical school training at McGill University in Montreal in 1999. He performed his training in Urology at the University of Western Ontario and became a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of Canada in 2004. Dr. Fazio went on to a fellowship in endourology and minimally-invasive surgery at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto in association with the University of Toronto. Dr. Fazio has been on staff as an attending urologist at Kingston General Hospital in association with Queen's University. Dr. Fazio is currently on staff at Humber River Hospital in Toronto practicing general urology with a special interest in the management of urinary stones and minimally-invasive surgery.
28
Michael Howlett 65, has been a Director on the Board of Directors of the Company since April of 2011. He brings more than three decades of experience in the private sector. His background includes a long and distinguished career with the Preston Group of Companies that culminated in his role as Chair and CEO, responsible for strategic planning, operations and mergers and acquisitions.
When Preston was acquired by OE Canon, Mr. Howlett dedicated his attention to helping re-shape companies in the not-for-profit sectors. His work with the Canadian Diabetes Association as President and CEO led the organization to national and international recognition through its research, education programs and influence in changing public policy. In 2008, he accepted an invitation from the Government of Canada to direct the two-year launch of the Mental Health Commission and created the financial, strategic and operational framework that would support its ten-year mandate to generate awareness and understanding of mental health.
Now, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Carmichael & Holmes Inc., he consults to a number of businesses throughout Canada and the United States, as well as in England and Europe. His focus is maximizing an organization’s potential to ensure profitability and growth. He brings extensive experience in the development, management and re-engineering of both start-up and established organizations in a broad range of sectors.
None of the officers or Board member(s) has been involved in any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which they were a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time.
None of the officers or Board member(s) has any conviction in a criminal proceeding or is subject to a pending criminal proceeding.
None of the officers or Board members is subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities. None of the officers or Board members have been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of equity securities of Nova with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.
Code of Ethics
The Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our CEO and senior officers. A copy of our Code of Ethics is attached hereto as an Exhibit 14. Shareholders may also request a copy of the Code of Ethics from:
Nova Natural Resources Corporation Attention: Investor Relations 5734 Yonge Street, suite 300, Toronto, Ontario Canada M2M 4E7
Board Meetings and Committees
The Company holds regular Board meetings each quarter. There are no sub committees of the Board of Directors. All Directors act on all matters before the Board.
29
Audit Committee
We currently do not have an Audit Committee, the Board currently handles the duties of the Audit Committee. The Company does not believe that not having an Audit Committee will have any adverse effect on its financial statements, based upon current operations. Management will assess whether an Audit Committee may be necessary in the future.
The President, Chief Executive Officer and Director has received convertible notes for compensation for our last fiscal year. There have been no annuity, pension or retirement benefits ever paid to our officers or directors. We currently do not have an employment agreement with the President and Chief Executive Officer.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 earned by the President, Chief Executive Officer and Vice-President:
|
Fiscal
|
Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year
|
Awards
|
Option
|
All Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principle Position
|
Ended
|
Salary ($)
|
Bonus ($)
|
($)(1)
|
Awards ($)
|
Compensation ($)
|
Total ($)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shawn Leon
|
2011
|
$ | 120,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 $58,032 | $ | 178,032 | ||||||||||||
President, Chief Executive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Officer
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
$ | 58,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 58,000 | ||||||||||||||
Richard Siegel
|
2011
|
$ | 98,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 57,744 | $ | 155,744 | ||||||||||||
Vice-President
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
$ | 8,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 8,000 |
The following table sets forth information regarding the ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 2011 by: (i) each Director; (ii) each of the Named Executives Officers in the Summary Compensation Table; (iii) all Executive Officers and Directors of the Company as a group and (iv) all those known by us to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock. As of December 31, 2011, there are 13,521,568 shares of common stock outstanding.
Title Of Class
|
Name and Beneficial Owner
|
Position
|
Amount
|
Percent of Class
|
||||||
|
||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Wayne Doss
|
Investor
|
2,505,000 | 16.1 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
Jay Parekh
|
Officer
|
1,525,000 | 9.8 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
Greenestone Clinic Inc.
|
Officer
|
2,600,000 | 16.8 | ||||||
|
B.O. Shawn Leon
|
Director
|
||||||||
Common Stock
|
Eileen Greene**
|
Investor
|
760,000 | 4.9 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
Luke Fazio
|
Director
|
500,000 | 3.2 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
Rheena Bhargava***
|
Investor
|
500,000 | 3.2 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
Richard Siegel
|
Officer
|
557,500 | 3.6 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
Ashwin Maharaj
|
Investor
|
1,000,000 | 6.4 | ||||||
Common Stock
|
T.E. Abraham
|
Officer
|
250,000 | 1.6 |
** Eileen Greene is the spouse of Shawn Leon.
*** Reena Bhargava is the spouse of Luke Fazio.
The Company President and CEO was party to two related party transactions. In March of 2011 the Company entered into an agreement with Cranberry Cove Holdings Ltd., a company wholly owned by the president, for the lease of the premises in Bala, Ontario. The terms of this lease were agreed to by other officers and stakeholders in the Company and an agreement was made directly with these officers and stakeholders with the Mortgagor of the premises. This lease is non binding on the Company at the end of the first, second and fifth year of the lease. The Company has purchase option that allows the Company to purchase the property at any time during the lease at fair market value to be determined by an appraisal. There is a minimum price of $4.5 million dollars which is equal to the debt on the property and a maximum value no matter what the appraisal comes in at. The maximum purchase value is $8.0 million in the first two years of the term and $10.0 million in the last three years of the term. The second transaction was for the purchase of substantially all of the assets used in the operation of the property. The value of the transaction was substantially lower than replacement cost and was a total of $269,982.00.
30
In January 2002, the Company's Board engaged Eddy S.L. Chin Chartered Accountant(Chin) as the independent accountant of the Company.
Fees that we paid to Eddy S.L. Chin Chartered Accountant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Eddy S.L. Chin Chartered Accountant completed the first quarter statements for 2011. In April 2011, The Company’s Board hired Watson Dauphenee Masuch (WDM) to take over the responsibilities of the Audit. WDM worked with the firm of Jarvis Ryan Associates (JRA) for the second quarter statements and the Company’s Board then hired JRA to complete the third quarter and became the Company’s Auditors. The fees paid to each of the acconting firms for the 2010 and 2011 year ends are set forth below:
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
Audit fees (Chin)
|
$ | 2,260 | $ | 12,000 | ||||
Tax fees (Chin)
|
0 | 1,200 | ||||||
Audit Fees (WDM)
|
16,000 | 0 | ||||||
Audit Fees (JRA)
|
30,000 | 0 | ||||||
Tax Fees
|
0 | 0 | ||||||
All other fees
|
0 | 0 | ||||||
|
$ | 48,260 | $ | 13,200 |
Audit Fees
Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011, and 2010.
Tax Fees
Tax fees were paid to auditors for tax compliance services during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and no fees for “Tax” were paid in 2011.
All Other Fees
We did not incur any other fees billed by auditors for services rendered to our Company, other than the services covered in "Audit Fees" and “Tax Fees” for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, and we did not incur any other fees billed by auditors for services rendered to our Company, other than the services covered in "Audit Fees" for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
Exhibit 14
|
Code of Ethics
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
|
32
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant
DATE: March 30, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Shawn Leon | |
Shawn Leon | |||
President, CEO | |||
33