EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 001-31648
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
74-2806888 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3500 COLLEGE BOULEVARD | ||
LEAWOOD, KANSAS | 66211 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(913) 327-4200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
The number of shares of the issuers common stock, $0.02 par value, outstanding as of July 31, 2010
was 50,990,720 shares.
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
As of | ||||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 202,587 | $ | 183,528 | ||||
Restricted cash |
72,796 | 73,148 | ||||||
Inventory PINs and other |
68,005 | 87,661 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $13,444 at
June 30, 2010 and $13,909 at December 31, 2009 |
226,105 | 282,905 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
31,056 | 31,344 | ||||||
Total current assets |
600,549 | 658,586 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $148,353 at
June 30, 2010 and $153,255 at December 31, 2009 |
81,916 | 96,592 | ||||||
Goodwill |
458,459 | 504,650 | ||||||
Acquired intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $92,047 at
June 30, 2010 and $88,924 at December 31, 2009 |
93,580 | 112,948 | ||||||
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $18,495 at June 30, 2010
and $16,866 at December 31, 2009 |
37,115 | 39,903 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,271,619 | $ | 1,412,679 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
$ | 207,956 | $ | 228,768 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
212,683 | 225,474 | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
1,835 | 2,510 | ||||||
Short-term debt obligations and current maturities of long-term debt obligations |
2,490 | 3,127 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
15,756 | 18,379 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
10,510 | 13,320 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
451,230 | 491,578 | ||||||
Debt obligations, net of current portion |
283,567 | 320,283 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
1,273 | 1,997 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,710 | 23,854 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
6,731 | 8,464 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
762,511 | 846,176 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred Stock, $0.02 par value. 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common Stock, $0.02 par value. 90,000,000 shares authorized; 51,216,358
issued at June 30, 2010 and 51,101,833 issued at December 31, 2009 |
1,024 | 1,022 | ||||||
Additional paid-in-capital |
746,704 | 740,990 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 250,228 shares at June 30, 2010 and 241,644 shares
at December 31, 2009 |
(1,643 | ) | (1,483 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(201,796 | ) | (203,139 | ) | ||||
Restricted reserve |
1,009 | 1,013 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(41,933 | ) | 20,566 | |||||
Total Euronet Worldwide, Inc. stockholders equity |
503,365 | 558,969 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
5,743 | 7,534 | ||||||
Total equity |
509,108 | 566,503 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,271,619 | $ | 1,412,679 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
EFT Processing Segment |
$ | 46,488 | $ | 45,592 | $ | 95,054 | $ | 91,798 | ||||||||
epay Segment |
137,689 | 145,253 | 283,069 | 279,776 | ||||||||||||
Money Transfer Segment |
60,051 | 57,769 | 116,108 | 110,737 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
244,228 | 248,614 | 494,231 | 482,311 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
160,836 | 165,053 | 326,697 | 318,601 | ||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
31,448 | 31,085 | 63,620 | 59,681 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
21,850 | 20,911 | 41,043 | 39,979 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and acquired intagible assets impairment |
| | | 9,884 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
13,552 | 13,541 | 28,100 | 26,444 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
227,686 | 230,590 | 459,460 | 454,589 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
16,542 | 18,024 | 34,771 | 27,722 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
572 | 885 | 1,127 | 1,854 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,031 | ) | (6,653 | ) | (9,985 | ) | (13,720 | ) | ||||||||
Income from unconsolidated affiliates |
447 | 516 | 1,001 | 1,034 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early retirement of debt |
| (150 | ) | | (253 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net |
(9,341 | ) | 9,650 | (14,423 | ) | (941 | ) | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
(13,353 | ) | 4,248 | (22,280 | ) | (12,026 | ) | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
3,189 | 22,272 | 12,491 | 15,696 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(4,344 | ) | (6,397 | ) | (10,131 | ) | (11,714 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
(1,155 | ) | 15,875 | 2,360 | 3,982 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net |
| 146 | | 85 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(1,155 | ) | 16,021 | 2,360 | 4,067 | |||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(328 | ) | (477 | ) | (1,017 | ) | (821 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Euronet Worldwide, Inc. |
$ | (1,483 | ) | $ | 15,544 | $ | 1,343 | $ | 3,246 | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Euronet
Worldwide, Inc. stockholders basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
50,914,453 | 50,425,261 | 50,857,812 | 50,358,983 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Euronet
Worldwide, Inc. stockholders diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
50,914,453 | 51,240,221 | 51,777,392 | 50,821,373 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (1,155 | ) | $ | 16,021 | $ | 2,360 | $ | 4,067 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
(41,652 | ) | 39,736 | (63,631 | ) | 18,123 | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps |
| 353 | | 830 | ||||||||||||
Gain on investment securities |
| 803 | | 1,030 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
(42,807 | ) | 56,913 | (61,271 | ) | 24,050 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
401 | (825 | ) | 115 | (925 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Euronet
Worldwide, Inc. |
$ | (42,406 | ) | $ | 56,088 | $ | (61,156 | ) | $ | 23,125 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,360 | $ | 4,067 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
28,100 | 26,444 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
4,391 | 3,825 | ||||||
Unrealized foreign exchange loss, net |
14,625 | 1,000 | ||||||
Non-cash impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets |
| 9,884 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(2,089 | ) | (2,679 | ) | ||||
Income from unconsolidated affiliates |
(1,001 | ) | (1,034 | ) | ||||
Accretion of convertible debentures discount and amortization of debt issuance costs |
4,332 | 5,855 | ||||||
Changes in working capital, net of amounts acquired: |
||||||||
Income taxes payable, net |
(2,839 | ) | 3,472 | |||||
Restricted cash |
(5,230 | ) | 32,460 | |||||
Inventory PINs and other |
14,531 | 8,857 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
34,211 | 28,577 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(2,340 | ) | (2,684 | ) | ||||
Trade accounts payable |
(3,737 | ) | (37,890 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
(2,684 | ) | (1,896 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
3,764 | (18,956 | ) | |||||
Changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities |
1,644 | (9,284 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
88,038 | 50,018 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
| (10,016 | ) | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(12,427 | ) | (16,783 | ) | ||||
Purchases of other long-term assets |
(2,618 | ) | (1,360 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
473 | (270 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(14,572 | ) | (28,429 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of shares |
1,311 | 888 | ||||||
Borrowings from revolving credit agreements classified as non-current liabilities |
108,000 | 285,400 | ||||||
Repayments of revolving credit agreements classified as non-current liabilities |
(147,172 | ) | (297,219 | ) | ||||
Repayments of long-term debt obligations |
(2,227 | ) | (27,083 | ) | ||||
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
(1,255 | ) | (3,149 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid to noncontrolling interests stockholders |
(1,676 | ) | (2,413 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
728 | (812 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(42,291 | ) | (44,388 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(12,116 | ) | 2,508 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
19,059 | (20,291 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period (includes cash of discontinued
operations of $552 in 2009) |
183,528 | 181,893 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (includes cash of discontinued operations
of $1,086 in 2009) |
$ | 202,587 | $ | 161,602 | ||||
Interest paid during the period |
$ | 5,643 | $ | 7,162 | ||||
Income taxes paid during the period |
15,191 | 11,805 |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) GENERAL
Organization
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or Euronet) is an industry leader in
processing secure electronic financial transactions in three principal business segments. Euronets
EFT Processing Segment provides end-to-end solutions relating to operations of automated teller
machine (ATM) and point-of-sale (POS) networks, and debit and credit card processing in Europe,
the Middle East and Asia Pacific. The epay Segment is one of the worlds largest providers of
top-up services for prepaid products, primarily prepaid mobile airtime, distributing these
products in Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific and North America. The Money Transfer Segment is
comprised primarily of the Companys RIA Envia, Inc. (RIA) subsidiary and its operating
subsidiaries, which is the third-largest global money transfer company based upon revenues and
volumes. The Money Transfer Segment provides services through a sending network of agents and
Company-owned stores primarily in North America and Europe, disbursing money transfers through a
worldwide correspondent network. See Note 8, Segment Information, for additional information about the
Companys business segments.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the records of
the Company, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP)
and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the
opinion of management, such unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting of normal interim closing procedures) necessary to present fairly the financial
position of the Company as of June 30, 2010, and the results of its operations for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and its cash flows for the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of Euronet for the year ended December 31, 2009, including the
notes thereto, set forth in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of
operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010. Certain amounts in the
prior year have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
Multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU
2009-13 adds estimated selling price as acceptable evidence of fair value of undelivered products
and services in revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Estimated selling price can be
used if there is no vendor specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of fair value.
Additionally, ASU 2009-13 eliminates the use of the residual method of allocating revenue and
establishes the relative selling price method as the appropriate means to allocate revenue to each
deliverable of an arrangement. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 did not materially affect the Companys
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Money transfer settlement obligations
Money transfer settlement obligations are recorded in accrued expenses and other current
liabilities on the Companys Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of amounts owed by
Euronet to money transfer recipients. As of June 30, 2010, the Companys money transfer settlement
obligations were $28.1 million.
7
Table of Contents
(3) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share has been computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective period. Diluted
earnings per share has been computed by dividing earnings available to common stockholders by the
weighted average shares outstanding during the respective period, after adjusting for any potential
dilution of the assumed conversion of the Companys convertible debentures, shares issuable in
connection with acquisition obligations, restricted stock and options to purchase the Companys
common stock. The following table provides the computation of diluted weighted average number of
common shares outstanding:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
50,914,453 | 50,425,261 | 50,857,812 | 50,358,983 | ||||||||||||
Incremental shares from assumed conversion of stock options
and restricted stock |
| 814,960 | 919,580 | 462,390 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
50,914,453 | 51,240,221 | 51,777,392 | 50,821,373 | ||||||||||||
The table includes all stock options and restricted stock that are dilutive to Euronets
weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. For the three months ended June 30,
2010, the Company incurred a net loss; therefore, diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss
per share for the period. The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share excludes stock
options or shares of restricted stock that are anti-dilutive to the Companys weighted average
common shares outstanding of approximately 4,963,000 and 2,252,000 for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and of approximately 1,989,000 and 3,868,000 for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
The Company has convertible debentures that, if converted, would have a potentially dilutive effect
on the Companys stock. As required by Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 260,
Earnings per Share, if dilutive, the impact of the contingently issuable shares must be included in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share under the if-converted method, regardless of
whether the conditions upon which the debentures would be convertible into shares of the Companys
common stock have been met. The Companys 3.50% debentures are convertible into 4.3 million shares
of common stock only upon the occurrence of certain conditions. Under the if-converted method, the
assumed conversion of the 3.50% debentures was anti-dilutive for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The Companys remaining 1.625% convertible debentures outstanding
were repurchased in January 2010 and the assumed conversion of the then-outstanding debentures was
anti-dilutive for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 and for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009.
(4) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company sold Euronet Essentis Limited (Essentis), a U.K.
software entity, in order to focus its investments and resources on its transaction processing
businesses. Accordingly, Essentiss results of operations are shown as discontinued operations in
the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Previously, Essentiss results were reported
in the EFT Processing Segment. The segment results in Note 8, Segment Information, also reflect the
classification of Essentiss results in discontinued operations. The following amounts related to
Essentis have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(in thousands) | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,835 | $ | 3,259 | ||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 212 | $ | 119 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 146 | $ | 85 |
8
Table of Contents
(5) GOODWILL AND ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
A summary of acquired intangible assets and goodwill activity for the six-month period ended June
30, 2010 is presented below:
Acquired | Total | |||||||||||
Intangible | Intangible | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | Assets | Goodwill | Assets | |||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
$ | 112,948 | $ | 504,650 | $ | 617,598 | ||||||
Decreases: |
||||||||||||
Amortization |
(11,295 | ) | | (11,295 | ) | |||||||
Other (primarily changes in foreign currency exchange rates) |
(8,073 | ) | (46,191 | ) | (54,264 | ) | ||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
$ | 93,580 | $ | 458,459 | $ | 552,039 | ||||||
Estimated annual amortization expense on intangible assets with finite lives, before income
taxes, as of June 30, 2010, is expected to total $22.1 million for 2010, $18.2 million for 2011,
$16.0 million for 2012, $12.0 million for 2013, $9.6 million for 2014 and $4.5 million for 2015.
The Companys annual goodwill impairment test is performed during the fourth quarter. The Companys
annual impairment test for the year ended December 31, 2008 resulted in the Company recording an
estimated non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $219.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2008
related to its RIA money transfer business and its Spanish prepaid business. The Company completed
the impairment testing in the first quarter of 2009 and recorded an additional non-cash goodwill
impairment charge of $8.8 million and a $1.1 million non-cash impairment charge related to a money
transfer intangible asset in the first quarter of 2009. The annual impairment test completed in the
fourth quarter of 2009 resulted in no impairment charges.
Determining the fair value of reporting units requires significant management judgment in
estimating future cash flows and assessing potential market and economic conditions. It is
reasonably possible that the Companys operations will not perform as expected, or that estimates
or assumptions could change, which may result in the Company recording additional material non-cash
impairment charges during the year in which these changes take place.
(6) DEBT OBLIGATIONS
A summary of debt obligation activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 is presented
below:
1.625% | 3.50% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revolving | Convertible | Convertible | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit | Other Debt | Capital | Debentures | Debentures | Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Facilities | Obligations | Leases | Due 2024 | Due 2025 | Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 39,164 | $ | 92 | $ | 4,507 | $ | 1,227 | $ | 153,927 | $ | 129,000 | $ | 327,917 | ||||||||||||||
Increases (decreases): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net borrowings (repayments) |
(39,172 | ) | 692 | (1,119 | ) | (1,227 | ) | | (1,000 | ) | (41,826 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Accretion |
| | | | 3,461 | | 3,461 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital lease interest |
| | 196 | | | | 196 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
8 | (115 | ) | (476 | ) | | | | (583 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
| 669 | 3,108 | | 157,388 | 128,000 | 289,165 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Less current maturities |
| (590 | ) | (1,835 | ) | | | (1,900 | ) | (4,325 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term obligations at June 30, 2010 |
$ | | $ | 79 | $ | 1,273 | $ | | $ | 157,388 | $ | 126,100 | $ | 284,840 | ||||||||||||||
In January 2010, the Company elected to redeem the remaining $1.2 million of outstanding
1.625% debentures at par. Contractual interest expense for the 1.625% convertible debentures was $1
thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Contractual interest expense was $0.2 million and
$0.5 million and discount accretion was $0.7 million and $1.6 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009,
respectively. The effective interest rate was 1.625% for the period the debentures were outstanding
during 2010 and 7.1% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
The 3.50% convertible debentures had principal amounts outstanding of $175.0 million and
unamortized discounts outstanding of $17.6 million and $21.1 million as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. The discount will be amortized through October 15, 2012.
Contractual interest expense was $1.5 million and $3.1 million for the respective three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010
9
Table of Contents
and 2009. Discount accretion was $1.7 million and $3.5
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $1.6 million and $3.2
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The effective interest rate
was 8.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
(7) DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts outstanding with a notional
value of $41.3 million, primarily in euros and U.S. dollars, which were not designated as hedges
and had a weighted average remaining maturity of 4.1 days. Although the Company enters into foreign
currency forward contracts to offset foreign currency exposure related to the notional value of
money transfer transactions collected in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, they are not
designated as hedges under ASC Topic 815. This is mainly due to the relatively short duration of
the contracts, typically 1 to 14 days, and the frequency with which the Company enters into them.
The Company has an office lease in a foreign country that requires payment in a currency that is
not the functional currency of either party to the lease or the Companys reporting currency.
Therefore, the lease contains an embedded derivative per ASC Topic 815 and its fair value is
recorded in the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2007, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements for a total notional amount of
$50 million to manage interest rate exposure related to a portion of the term loan. The interest
rate swap agreements were determined to be cash flow hedges and effectively converted $50 million
of the term loan to a fixed interest rate of 7.3% through the May 2009 maturity date of the swap
agreements. The swap agreements required no payment by either party at their maturities.
Below are the tabular disclosures required for derivative instruments:
Fair Values of Derivative | ||||||||||
Instruments | ||||||||||
Consolidated Balance | December 31, | |||||||||
(in thousands) | Sheet Location | June 30, 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 |
||||||||||
Foreign
currency
derivative
contracts -
gross gains |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 113 | $ | 138 | |||||
Foreign currency
derivative
contracts -
gross losses |
Cash and cash equivalents | (74 | ) | (102 | ) | |||||
Total |
$ | 39 | $ | 36 | ||||||
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||
Embedded derivative in foreign lease |
Other long-term liabilities | $ | (198 | ) | $ | (220 | ) | |||
Total derivatives |
$ | (159 | ) | $ | (184 | ) | ||||
10
Table of Contents
Amount of Gain Recognized in | Amount of Gain Recognized in | |||||||||||||||
OCI on Derivative (Effective | OCI on Derivative (Effective | |||||||||||||||
Portion) | Portion) | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC Topic 815 Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps related to floating rate debt |
$ | | $ | 353 | $ | | $ | 830 | ||||||||
Amount of Gain (Loss) | Amount of Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||
Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain (Loss) | Derivative | Derivative | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized in Income on | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Derivative | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under ASC
Topic 815 |
||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivative
contracts |
Foreign
currency exchange gain (loss), net |
$ | (44 | ) | $ | 42 | $ | 99 | $ | 5 | ||||||||
Embedded derivative in
foreign lease |
Foreign
currency exchange gain (loss), net |
(41 | ) | 276 | 22 | (293 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (85 | ) | $ | 318 | $ | 121 | $ | (288 | ) | ||||||||
See Note 9, Fair Value Measurements, for the determination of the fair values of derivatives.
(8) SEGMENT INFORMATION
Euronets reportable operating segments have been determined in accordance with ASC Topic 280,
Segment Reporting. The Company currently operates in the following three reportable operating
segments:
1) | Through the EFT Processing Segment, the Company processes transactions for a network of ATMs and POS terminals across Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific. The Company provides comprehensive electronic payment solutions consisting of ATM network participation, outsourced ATM and POS management solutions, credit and debit card outsourcing and electronic recharge services for prepaid mobile airtime. Through this segment, the Company also offers a suite of integrated electronic financial transaction (EFT) software solutions for electronic payment and transaction delivery systems. | ||
2) | Through the epay Segment, the Company provides distribution of prepaid mobile airtime and other electronic payment products and collection services in Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific and North America. | ||
3) | Through the Money Transfer Segment, the Company provides global consumer-to-consumer money transfer and bill payment services through a sending network of agents and Company-owned stores primarily in North America and Europe, disbursing money transfers through a worldwide correspondent network. Bill payment services are offered primarily in the U.S. |
In addition, in its administrative division, Corporate Services, Eliminations and Other, the
Company accounts for non-operating activity, share-based compensation expense, certain intersegment
eliminations and the costs of providing corporate and other administrative services to the three
segments. These services are not directly identifiable with the Companys reportable operating
segments.
11
Table of Contents
The following tables present the segment results of the Companys operations for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Services, | ||||||||||||||||||||
EFT | Money | Eliminations | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Processing | epay | Transfer | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 46,488 | $ | 137,689 | $ | 60,051 | $ | | $ | 244,228 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
22,790 | 109,754 | 28,292 | | 160,836 | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
6,863 | 7,154 | 13,886 | 3,545 | 31,448 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,116 | 7,429 | 8,666 | 1,639 | 21,850 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,486 | 3,822 | 4,967 | 277 | 13,552 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
38,255 | 128,159 | 55,811 | 5,461 | 227,686 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 8,233 | $ | 9,530 | $ | 4,240 | $ | (5,461 | ) | $ | 16,542 | |||||||||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Services, | ||||||||||||||||||||
EFT | Money | Eliminations | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Processing | epay | Transfer | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 45,592 | $ | 145,253 | $ | 57,769 | $ | | $ | 248,614 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
19,656 | 117,342 | 28,055 | | 165,053 | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
7,443 | 6,793 | 13,103 | 3,746 | 31,085 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,157 | 5,409 | 8,847 | 2,498 | 20,911 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,537 | 3,598 | 5,083 | 323 | 13,541 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
35,793 | 133,142 | 55,088 | 6,567 | 230,590 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 9,799 | $ | 12,111 | $ | 2,681 | $ | (6,567 | ) | $ | 18,024 | |||||||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Services, | ||||||||||||||||||||
EFT | Money | Eliminations | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Processing | epay | Transfer | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 95,054 | $ | 283,069 | $ | 116,108 | $ | | $ | 494,231 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
46,718 | 225,353 | 54,626 | | 326,697 | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
13,104 | 15,479 | 28,083 | 6,954 | 63,620 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,870 | 12,660 | 17,610 | 2,903 | 41,043 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
9,410 | 7,977 | 10,057 | 656 | 28,100 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
77,102 | 261,469 | 110,376 | 10,513 | 459,460 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 17,952 | $ | 21,600 | $ | 5,732 | $ | (10,513 | ) | $ | 34,771 | |||||||||
12
Table of Contents
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Services, | ||||||||||||||||||||
EFT | Money | Eliminations | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Processing | epay | Transfer | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 91,798 | $ | 279,776 | $ | 110,737 | $ | | $ | 482,311 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
38,611 | 226,377 | 53,613 | | 318,601 | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
14,455 | 13,217 | 24,923 | 7,086 | 59,681 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
8,304 | 9,951 | 17,662 | 4,062 | 39,979 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment |
| | 9,884 | | 9,884 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,719 | 7,244 | 9,845 | 636 | 26,444 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
70,089 | 256,789 | 115,927 | 11,784 | 454,589 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 21,709 | $ | 22,987 | $ | (5,190 | ) | $ | (11,784 | ) | $ | 27,722 | ||||||||
(9) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, trade accounts
payable and short-term debt obligations approximate fair values due to their short maturities. The
carrying values of the Companys term loan due 2014 and revolving credit agreements approximate
fair values because interest is based on London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) that resets at
various intervals of less than one year. The following table provides the estimated fair values of
the Companys other financial instruments, based on quoted market prices or significant other
observable inputs.
As of | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Value | Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
3.50% convertible debentures, unsecured, due 2025 |
(157,388 | ) | (160,125 | ) | (153,927 | ) | (162,313 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency derivative contracts |
39 | 39 | 36 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Embedded derivative in foreign lease |
(198 | ) | (198 | ) | (220 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||||||
1.625% convertible senior debentures, unsecured, due 2024 |
| | (1,227 | ) | (1,224 | ) |
The Companys assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis using
significant other observable inputs are the foreign currency derivative contracts and the embedded
derivative in foreign lease. The Company values foreign currency derivative contracts using foreign
currency exchange quotations for similar assets and liabilities. The embedded derivative in foreign
lease is valued using present value techniques and foreign currency exchange quotations.
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. During the first quarter of
2009, the Company finalized the assessment of the fair value of the goodwill related to its RIA
money transfer business and its Spanish prepaid business and recorded an impairment charge of $8.8
million as discussed in Note 5, Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets, Net. The fair values were
determined using significant unobservable inputs. The $258.8 million fair value of goodwill was
determined by calculating its implied fair value as the excess of the fair value of the respective
entity over the fair value of its net assets. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2009,
management determined that an acquired intangible asset associated with a previous acquisition in
the Money Transfer Segment had no value and, accordingly, the Company wrote off the remaining net
book value of the intangible asset of $1.1 million.
13
Table of Contents
(10) GUARANTEES
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had $53.9 million of stand-by letters of credit/bank guarantees
issued on its behalf, of which $10.1 million are collateralized by cash deposits held by the
respective issuing banks.
Under certain circumstances, Euronet grants guarantees in support of obligations of subsidiaries.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company granted off balance sheet guarantees for cash in various ATM
networks amounting to $18.3 million over the terms of the cash supply agreements and performance
guarantees amounting to approximately $27.0 million over the terms of the agreements with the
customers.
From time to time, Euronet enters into agreements with unaffiliated parties that contain
indemnification provisions, the terms of which may vary depending on the negotiated terms of each
respective agreement. The amount of such potential obligations is generally not stated in the
agreements. Our liability under such indemnification provisions may be mitigated by relevant
insurance coverage and may be subject to time and materiality limitations, monetary caps and other
conditions and defenses. Such indemnification obligations include the following:
| In connection with contracts with financial institutions in the EFT Processing Segment, the Company is responsible for damage to ATMs and theft of ATM network cash that, generally, is not recorded on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2010, the balance of ATM network cash for which the Company was responsible was approximately $230 million. The Company maintains insurance policies to mitigate this exposure; | ||
| In connection with the license of proprietary systems to customers, Euronet provides certain warranties and infringement indemnities to the licensee, which generally warrant that such systems do not infringe on intellectual property owned by third parties and that the systems will perform in accordance with their specifications; | ||
| Euronet has entered into purchase and service agreements with vendors and consulting agreements with providers of consulting services, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify certain of such vendors and consultants, respectively, against third-party claims arising from the Companys use of the vendors product or the services of the vendor or consultant; | ||
| In connection with acquisitions and dispositions of subsidiaries, operating units and business assets, the Company has entered into agreements containing indemnification provisions, which can be generally described as follows: (i) in connection with acquisitions made by Euronet, the Company has agreed to indemnify the seller against third party claims made against the seller relating to the subject subsidiary, operating unit or asset and arising after the closing of the transaction, and (ii) in connection with dispositions made by Euronet, Euronet has agreed to indemnify the buyer against damages incurred by the buyer due to the buyers reliance on representations and warranties relating to the subject subsidiary, operating unit or business assets in the disposition agreement if such representations or warranties were untrue when made; | ||
| Euronet has entered into agreements with certain third parties, including banks that provide fiduciary and other services to Euronet or to the Companys benefit plans. Under such agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify such service providers for third party claims relating to the carrying out of their respective duties under such agreements; and | ||
| The Company has obtained surety bonds in compliance with money transfer licensing requirements of the applicable governmental authorities. |
The Company is also required to meet minimum capitalization and cash requirements of various
regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company has money transfer operations. To
date, the Company is not aware of any significant claims made by the indemnified parties or third
parties to guarantee agreements with the Company and, accordingly, no liabilities were recorded as
of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
(11) INCOME TAXES
The Companys effective tax rates for continuing operations were 136.2% and 28.7% for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and were 81.1% and 74.6% for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rates were
significantly influenced by the foreign currency exchange gains and losses in the respective
periods and by the goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment charge in the first quarter
of 2009. Excluding foreign currency exchange results and the impairment charge from pre-tax income,
as well as the related tax effects for these items, the Companys effective tax rates were 36.2%
and 46.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 39.0% and 44.1% for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The increase in the effective tax rate, as adjusted, for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the
applicable statutory rate of 35% is primarily related to the Companys U.S. tax position. For the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance
against its U.S. federal tax net operating losses as it is more likely than not that a tax benefit
will not be realized. Accordingly, the federal income tax benefit associated with pre-tax book
losses generated by the Companys U.S. entities has
14
Table of Contents
not been recognized in these periods. For the second quarter of 2010, this increase was partly
offset by a $1.0 million adjustment to the reserve related to deferred tax assets generated from
prior U.S. net operating losses. Additionally, the effective tax rate for the first half of 2010 is
lower due to a $0.8 million adjustment related to a foreign tax law change.
(12) CONTINGENCIES
In the second quarter of 2009, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice
(the DOJ) served Continental Exchange Solutions, Inc. d/b/a RIA Financial Services (CES), an
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, with a grand jury subpoena requesting documents
from CES and its affiliates in connection with an investigation into possible price collusion
related to money transmission services to the Dominican Republic (D.R.) during the period from
January 1, 2004 to the date of the subpoena. The Company acquired all of the stock of RIA Envia,
Inc., the parent of CES, in April 2007. CES foreign exchange transactions between the U.S and
the D.R. generated approximately 0.3% of the Companys 2009 consolidated revenues. The Company and
CES are fully cooperating with the DOJ in its investigation.
The Company believes that, during the period covered by the DOJ investigation, CES generally
derived part of its charge for exchanging U.S. dollars into D.R. pesos from a reference rate
recommended by ADEREDI, a trade association in the D.R. composed of a CES subsidiary and other D.R.
money transfer firms. The Company further believes, however, that CES set its own service fee
on the D.R. transactions and its overall transaction price to customers. Customers were also free
during this time period to use CES and other firms to transmit
dollars into the D.R., without
conversion into D.R. pesos, and the Company believes such transmissions occurred with increasing
frequency over the course of this time period.
At this time, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of the DOJ investigation, or, if charges
were to be brought against CES, the possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution
of any such charges. Nor can the Company predict any potential effect on the Companys business,
results of operations or financial condition arising from such charges or potential collateral
consequences, which could include fines, penalties, limitations on or revocation of CESs license to
engage in the money transfer business in one or more states, and civil liability. In addition, the
Company has incurred and may continue to incur significant fees and expenses in connection with the
DOJ investigation and related matters.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
COMPANY OVERVIEW, GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS AND PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (Euronet the Company, we or us) is a leading electronic payments
provider. We offer payment and transaction processing and distribution solutions to financial
institutions, retailers, service providers and individual consumers. Our primary product offerings
include comprehensive automated teller machine (ATM), point-of-sale (POS) and card outsourcing
services; electronic distribution of prepaid mobile airtime and other prepaid products; and global
consumer money transfer services. As of June 30, 2010, we operate in the following three principal
business segments:
| The EFT Processing Segment, which processes transactions for a network of 10,408 ATMs and approximately 57,000 POS terminals across Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific. We provide comprehensive electronic payment solutions consisting of ATM network participation, outsourced ATM and POS management solutions, credit and debit card outsourcing and electronic recharge services for prepaid mobile airtime. Through this segment, we also offer a suite of integrated electronic financial transaction (EFT) software solutions for electronic payment and transaction delivery systems. | ||
| The epay Segment, which provides distribution of prepaid mobile airtime and other electronic payment products and collection services for various prepaid products, cards and services. Including terminals operated by unconsolidated subsidiaries, we operate a network of approximately 515,000 POS terminals providing electronic processing of prepaid mobile airtime top-up services in Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific and North America. | ||
| The Money Transfer Segment, which provides global consumer-to-consumer money transfer and bill payment services through a sending network of agents and Company-owned stores primarily in North America and Europe, disbursing money transfers through a worldwide correspondent network. The Money Transfer Segment originates and terminates transactions through a network of approximately 104,400 locations, which include sending agents and Company-owned stores, and an extensive correspondent network in 120 countries. Bill payment services are offered primarily in the U.S. |
We have six processing centers in Europe, two in Asia Pacific and two in North America. We have 25
principal offices in Europe, seven in North America, six in Asia Pacific and one in the Middle
East. Our executive offices are located in Leawood, Kansas, USA. With approximately 76% of our
revenues denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, any significant changes in currency
exchange rates will likely have a significant impact on our results of operations.
SOURCES OF REVENUES AND CASH FLOW
Euronet earns revenues and income based on ATM management fees, transaction fees and commissions,
professional services, software licensing fees and software maintenance agreements. Each business
segments sources of revenue are described below.
EFT Processing Segment Revenues in the EFT Processing Segment, which represented approximately
19% of total consolidated revenues for the first half of 2010, are derived from fees charged for
transactions made by cardholders on our proprietary network of ATMs, as well as fixed management
fees and transaction fees we charge to banks for operating ATMs and processing debit and credit
cards under outsourcing agreements. Through our proprietary network, we generally charge fees for
four types of ATM transactions: i) cash withdrawals, ii) balance inquiries, iii) transactions not
completed because the relevant card issuer did not give authorization, and iv) prepaid
telecommunication recharges. Revenues in this segment are also derived from license fees,
professional services and maintenance fees for software and sales of related hardware. Software
license fees are the fees we charge to license our proprietary application software to customers.
Professional service fees consist of charges for customization, installation and consulting
services to customers. Software maintenance revenues represent the ongoing fees charged for
maintenance and support for customers software products. Hardware sales are derived from the sale
of computer equipment necessary for the respective software solution.
epay Segment Revenues in the epay Segment, which represented approximately 57% of total
consolidated revenues for the first half of 2010, are primarily derived from commissions or
processing fees received from telecommunications service providers for the sale and distribution of
prepaid mobile airtime. We also generate revenues from commissions earned from the distribution of
other electronic payment products. Due to certain provisions in our mobile phone operator
agreements, the operators have the ability to reduce the overall commission paid on each top-up
transaction. However, by virtue of our agreements with retailers (distributors where POS terminals
are located) in certain markets, not all of these reductions are absorbed by us because we are able
to pass a significant portion of the reductions to retailers. Accordingly, under certain retailer
agreements, the effect is to reduce revenues and reduce our direct operating costs resulting in
only a small impact on gross profit and operating income. In some markets, reductions in
commissions can significantly impact our results as it may not be possible, either contractually or
commercially in the concerned market, to pass a reduction in commissions to the retailers. In
Australia, certain retailers negotiate directly with the mobile phone operators for their own
commission rates, which also limits our ability to pass through reductions in commissions.
Agreements with mobile operators are important to the success of our business. These agreements
permit us to distribute prepaid mobile airtime to the mobile operators customers. Other
16
Table of Contents
products offered by this segment include prepaid long distance calling card plans, prepaid Internet
plans, prepaid debit cards, prepaid gift cards, prepaid vouchers, transport payments, lottery
payments, bill payment, money transfer and prepaid content such as music and games.
Money Transfer Segment Revenues in the Money Transfer Segment, which represented approximately
24% of total consolidated revenues for the first half of 2010, are primarily derived from charging
a transaction fee and retaining the difference between the price of foreign currency purchased at
wholesale exchange rates and sold to consumers at retail exchange rates. We have an origination
network in place comprised of agents and Company-owned stores primarily in North America and Europe
and a worldwide network of correspondent agents, consisting primarily of financial institutions in
the transfer destination countries. Origination and correspondent agents each earn fees for cash
collection and distribution services. These fees are recognized as direct operating costs at the
time of sale.
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
EFT Processing Segment - The continued expansion and development of our EFT Processing Segment
business will depend on various factors including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:
| the impact of competition by banks and other ATM operators and service providers in our current target markets; | ||
| the demand for our ATM outsourcing services in our current target markets; | ||
| the ability to develop products or services to drive increases in transactions; | ||
| the expansion of our various business lines in markets where we operate and in new markets; | ||
| the entrance into additional card acceptance and ATM management agreements with banks; | ||
| the ability to obtain required licenses in markets we intend to enter or expand services; | ||
| the availability of financing for expansion; | ||
| the ability to efficiently install ATMs contracted under newly awarded outsourcing agreements; | ||
| the ability to renew existing contracts at profitable rates; | ||
| the ability to maintain pricing and interchange fees at current levels; | ||
| the ability to expand and sign additional customers for the cross-border merchant processing and acquiring business; and | ||
| the continued development and implementation of our software products and their ability to interact with other leading products. |
epay Segment The continued expansion and development of the epay Segment business will depend on
various factors, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:
| the ability to negotiate new agreements in additional markets with mobile phone operators, agent financial institutions and retailers; | ||
| the ability to use existing expertise and relationships with mobile operators and retailers to our advantage; | ||
| the continued use of third-party providers such as ourselves to supply electronic processing solutions for prepaid content; | ||
| the development of mobile phone networks in the markets in which we do business and the increase in the number of mobile phone users; | ||
| the overall pace of growth in the prepaid mobile phone market; | ||
| our market share of the retail distribution capacity; | ||
| the level of commission that is paid to the various intermediaries in the prepaid distribution chain; | ||
| our ability to fully recover monies collected by retailers; | ||
| our ability to add new and differentiated prepaid products in addition to those offered by mobile operators; | ||
| the ability to take advantage of cross-selling opportunities with our Money Transfer Segment, including providing money transfer services through our prepaid locations; and | ||
| the availability of financing for further expansion. |
Money Transfer Segment The expansion and development of our money transfer business will depend
on various factors, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:
| the continued growth in worker migration and employment opportunities; | ||
| the mitigation of economic and political factors that have had an adverse impact on money transfer volumes, such as changes in the economic sectors in which immigrants work and the developments in immigration policies in the U.S.; | ||
| the continuation of the trend of increased use of electronic money transfer and bill payment services among immigrant workers and the unbanked population in our markets; | ||
| the ability to maintain our agent and correspondent networks; | ||
| the ability to offer our products and services or develop new products and services at competitive prices to drive increases in transactions; | ||
| the expansion of our services in markets where we operate and in new markets; | ||
| the ability to strengthen our brands; | ||
| our ability to fund working capital requirements; |
17
Table of Contents
| our ability to recover from agents funds collected from customers and our ability to recover advances made to correspondents; | ||
| our ability to maintain compliance with the regulatory requirements of the jurisdictions in which we operate or plan to operate; | ||
| the ability to take advantage of cross-selling opportunities with our epay Segment, including providing prepaid services through RIAs stores and agents worldwide; | ||
| the ability to leverage our banking and merchant/retailer relationships to expand money transfer corridors to Europe, Asia and Africa, including high growth corridors to Central and Eastern European countries; | ||
| the availability of financing for further expansion; | ||
| our ability to continue to successfully integrate RIA with our other operations; and | ||
| our ability to successfully expand our agent network in Europe using our Payment Services Directive license. |
Corporate Services, Eliminations and Other - In addition to operating in our principal business
segments described above, our Corporate Services, Elimination and Other category includes
non-operating activity, certain inter-segment eliminations and the cost of providing corporate and
other administrative services to the business segments, including share-based compensation expense.
These services are not directly identifiable with our business segments.
SEGMENT SUMMARY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues and operating income by segment for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 are summarized in the tables below:
Year-over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues for the Three | Increase | Increase | Revenues for the Six | Year-over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Months Ended June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | Months Ended June 30, | Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFT Processing |
$ | 46,488 | $ | 45,592 | $ | 896 | 2 | % | $ | 95,054 | $ | 91,798 | $ | 3,256 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
epay |
137,689 | 145,253 | (7,564 | ) | (5 | )% | 283,069 | 279,776 | 3,293 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Money Transfer |
60,051 | 57,769 | 2,282 | 4 | % | 116,108 | 110,737 | 5,371 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 244,228 | $ | 248,614 | $ | (4,386 | ) | (2 | )% | $ | 494,231 | $ | 482,311 | $ | 11,920 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) | Year-over-Year Change | Operating Income (Loss) | Year-over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for the Three Months | Increase | Increase | for the Six Months Ended | Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFT Processing |
$ | 8,233 | $ | 9,799 | $ | (1,566 | ) | (16 | )% | $ | 17,952 | $ | 21,709 | $ | (3,757 | ) | (17 | )% | ||||||||||||||
epay |
9,530 | 12,111 | (2,581 | ) | (21 | )% | 21,600 | 22,987 | (1,387 | ) | (6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Money Transfer |
4,240 | 2,681 | 1,559 | 58 | % | 5,732 | (5,190 | ) | 10,922 | n/m | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
22,003 | 24,591 | (2,588 | ) | (11 | )% | 45,284 | 39,506 | 5,778 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate services |
(5,461 | ) | (6,567 | ) | 1,106 | (17 | )% | (10,513 | ) | (11,784 | ) | 1,271 | (11 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 16,542 | $ | 18,024 | $ | (1,482 | ) | (8 | )% | $ | 34,771 | $ | 27,722 | $ | 7,049 | 25 | % | |||||||||||||||
n/m | - Not meaningful. |
18
Table of Contents
Impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
Compared to most of the currencies of the foreign countries in which we operate, the U.S. dollar
was weaker during the first half of 2010 than it was in the first half of 2009. Because our
revenues and local expenses are recorded in the functional currencies of our operating entities,
amounts we earned for the first half of 2010 are positively impacted by the weaker U.S. dollar. For
the second quarter of 2010, the U.S. dollar was weaker than some currencies of the foreign
countries in which we operate and was stronger than others compared to the second quarter of 2009.
Considering the results by country and the associated functional currency, we estimate that our
operating income for the first half of 2010 benefitted by approximately 8% when compared to the
first half of 2009 as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The impact of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates on our consolidated operating income was negligible for the
second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009. If significant, in our discussion we
will refer to the impact of fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates in our comparison of
operating segment results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. To
provide further perspective on the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, the following table
shows the changes in values relative to the U.S. dollar from the second quarter and first half of
2009 to the second quarter and first half of 2010 of the currencies of the countries in which we
have our most significant operations:
Average Translation Rate | Increase | Average Translation Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | (Decrease) | Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||
Currency | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | Percent | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
Australian dollar |
$ | 0.8834 | $ | 0.7615 | 16 | % | $ | 0.8932 | $ | 0.7133 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
British pound |
$ | 1.4916 | $ | 1.5521 | (4 | )% | $ | 1.5257 | $ | 1.4953 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
euro |
$ | 1.2739 | $ | 1.3633 | (7 | )% | $ | 1.3286 | $ | 1.3346 | | |||||||||||||
Hungarian forint |
$ | 0.0047 | $ | 0.0048 | (2 | )% | $ | 0.0049 | $ | 0.0046 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
Indian rupee |
$ | 0.0220 | $ | 0.0206 | 7 | % | $ | 0.0219 | $ | 0.0204 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
Polish zloty |
$ | 0.3182 | $ | 0.3073 | 4 | % | $ | 0.3327 | $ | 0.2992 | 11 | % |
COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE- AND SIX-MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND
2009
EFT PROCESSING SEGMENT
The following table presents the results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 for our EFT Processing Segment:
Year-over-Year Change | Year-over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase | Increase | Six Months Ended | Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 46,488 | $ | 45,592 | $ | 896 | 2 | % | $ | 95,054 | $ | 91,798 | $ | 3,256 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
22,790 | 19,656 | 3,134 | 16 | % | 46,718 | 38,611 | 8,107 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
6,863 | 7,443 | (580 | ) | (8 | )% | 13,104 | 14,455 | (1,351 | ) | (9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,116 | 4,157 | (41 | ) | (1 | )% | 7,870 | 8,304 | (434 | ) | (5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,486 | 4,537 | (51 | ) | (1 | )% | 9,410 | 8,719 | 691 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
38,255 | 35,793 | 2,462 | 7 | % | 77,102 | 70,089 | 7,013 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 8,233 | $ | 9,799 | $ | (1,566 | ) | (16 | )% | $ | 17,952 | $ | 21,709 | $ | (3,757 | ) | (17 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Transactions processed (millions) |
197.3 | 174.3 | 23.0 | 13 | % | 384.7 | 327.6 | 57.1 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ATMs as of June 30 |
10,408 | 9,336 | 1,072 | 11 | % | 10,408 | 9,336 | 1,072 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average ATMs |
10,370 | 9,280 | 1,090 | 12 | % | 10,288 | 9,339 | 949 | 10 | % |
19
Table of Contents
Revenues
Our revenues for the first half of 2010 increased when compared to the first half of 2009 primarily
due to the increased transaction fees in Germany, growth in transaction volumes on Cashnet
Euronets shared ATM network in India, and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar. Because our
revenues are recorded in the functional currencies of our operating entities, amounts we earn in
foreign currencies are positively impacted by the weaker U.S. dollar. These increases were partly
offset by contract termination fees totaling $4.4 million during the first quarter of 2009,
reductions in interchange fee revenues in Poland beginning in the second quarter of 2010 and by a
decrease in revenues from our software business, mainly due to the sale of a significant license
during the first quarter of 2009 to an entity in which Euronet has a 10% stake.
Average monthly revenue per ATM was $1,494 for the second quarter and $1,540 for the first half of
2010, compared to $1,638 for the second quarter and first half of 2009. The decrease in the second
quarter of 2010 from the same period in 2009 is primarily due to the reduction in Visa Europe and
MasterCard interchange fee revenues in Poland that took effect in the second quarter of 2010. The
decrease in the first half of 2010 from the same period in 2009 was also impacted by the
non-recurring contract termination fees discussed above. Revenue per transaction was $0.24 for the
second quarter and $0.25 for the first half of 2010, compared to $0.26 for the second quarter and
$0.28 for the first half of 2009. These decreases are primarily the result of the reduction in
interchange fee revenues and the non-recurring contract termination fees discussed above, as well
as the growth of Cashnet transactions which generate lower revenues per transaction than those on
owned or outsourced ATMs. Partly offsetting these decreases are the increase in transaction fees in
Germany and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar. We were able to increase transaction fees in
Germany beginning in mid-2009, but we are uncertain if we will be able to maintain the current
rates.
Direct operating costs
Direct operating costs consist primarily of site rental fees, cash delivery costs, cash supply
costs, maintenance, insurance, telecommunications and the cost of data center operations-related
personnel, as well as the processing centers facility related costs and other processing center
related expenses. The increase in direct operating costs for the first half of 2010, compared to
the first half of 2009, is attributed to the increase in the number of ATMs under operation and the
impact of the weaker U.S. dollar.
Gross profit
Gross profit, which is calculated as revenues less direct operating costs, decreased to $23.7
million for the second quarter and $48.3 million for the first half of 2010 from $25.9 million for
the second quarter and $53.2 million for the first half of 2009. These decreases are mainly
attributable to the reduced interchange fees in Poland and the first quarter 2009 contract
termination fee revenues discussed above. Partly offsetting these decreases are the increased
transaction fees in Germany, growth in Cashnet transaction volumes and the impact of the weaker
U.S. dollar. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues (gross margin) was 51% for the second
quarter and first half of 2010 compared to 57% for the second quarter and 58% for the first half of
2009. The decrease in the second quarter gross margin is primarily due to the previously mentioned
interchange fee revenue reductions while the decrease in the first half gross margin is also
impacted by the $4.4 million contract termination fees discussed above.
Salaries and benefits
The decrease in salaries and benefits for the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009
is primarily due to lower bonus expense related to reduced operating income, partly offset by the
impact of the weaker U.S. dollar discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, these costs
decreased to 14% of revenues for the first half of 2010 compared to 16% for the first half of 2009.
Selling, general and administrative
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses for the first half of 2010 compared to
the first half of 2009 is due to general cost control measures, partly offset by the impact of the
weaker U.S. dollar discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses decreased slightly to 8% for the first half of 2010 compared to 9% for the
first half of 2009.
Depreciation and amortization
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense for the first half of 2010 compared to the
first half of 2009 is due primarily to the growth in the number of ATMs and the impact of the
weaker U.S. dollar described above. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization
expense was 10% for the first half of 2010 compared to 9% for the first half of 2009.
Operating income
The decrease in operating income for the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 is
primarily due to the reduced interchange fee revenues and the first quarter 2009 contract
termination fees, partly offset by the increased transaction fees in Germany, growth in Cashnet
volumes and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar. Operating income as
a percentage of revenues (operating margin) for
the first half of 2010 was
20
Table of Contents
19% compared to 24% for the first half of 2009. Operating income per transaction was $0.05 for the
first half of 2010 compared to $0.07 for the first half of 2009.
EPAY SEGMENT
The following table presents the results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 for our epay Segment:
Year-over-Year Change | Year-over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase | Increase | Six Months Ended | Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 137,689 | $ | 145,253 | $ | (7,564 | ) | (5 | )% | $ | 283,069 | $ | 279,776 | $ | 3,293 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
109,754 | 117,342 | (7,588 | ) | (6 | )% | 225,353 | 226,377 | (1,024 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
7,154 | 6,793 | 361 | 5 | % | 15,479 | 13,217 | 2,262 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,429 | 5,409 | 2,020 | 37 | % | 12,660 | 9,951 | 2,709 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,822 | 3,598 | 224 | 6 | % | 7,977 | 7,244 | 733 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
128,159 | 133,142 | (4,983 | ) | (4 | )% | 261,469 | 256,789 | 4,680 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 9,530 | $ | 12,111 | $ | (2,581 | ) | (21 | )% | $ | 21,600 | $ | 22,987 | $ | (1,387 | ) | (6 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Transactions processed (millions) |
204.4 | 194.2 | 10.2 | 5 | % | 404.2 | 378.5 | 25.7 | 7 | % |
Revenues
The increase in revenues for the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 was
primarily due to the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar in the first half of 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009 relative to most of the currencies of the countries in which we operate,
particularly the Australian dollar. Revenues also improved due to the increase, primarily in
Germany, in total transactions processed. These increases were partly offset by mobile operator
commission rate decreases in certain markets, declines in transactions processed in the U.K.,
Australia and Spain due to economic pressures, and changes in the mix
of transactions to lower revenue transactions. The epay Segment
offers different levels of service with associated differences in revenues and costs per
transaction. In the second quarter of 2010, transactions processed increased, but a shift in the
mix of transactions contributed to lower revenues. However, due to higher profit margins for these
transactions, our gross profits remained constant. Additionally, the impact of the weaker U.S.
dollar was less pronounced in the second quarter of 2010 than the first; therefore, the second
quarter 2010 revenues benefitted less from the changes in foreign currency exchange rates and
decreased compared to the second quarter 2009 revenues.
In certain more mature markets, such as the U.K., New Zealand and Spain, revenues have remained
flat or declined because conversion from scratch cards to electronic top-up is substantially
complete and certain mobile operators and retailers are driving competitive reductions in pricing
and margins. We expect most of our future revenue growth in this segment to be derived from: (i)
additional products sold over the base of prepaid processing terminals, (ii) developing markets or
markets in which there is organic growth in the prepaid sector overall, (iii) continued conversion
from scratch cards to electronic top-up in less mature markets, and (iv) acquisitions, if
available.
Revenues per transaction were $0.67 for the second quarter and $0.70 for the first half of 2010
compared to $0.75 for the second quarter and $0.74 for the first half of 2009. The decreases in
revenues per transaction are due mainly to the decrease in mobile
operator commission rates and changes in the
mix of transactions, particularly growth in India where revenues per transaction are considerably
lower than average.
Direct operating costs
Direct operating costs in the epay Segment include the commissions we pay to retail merchants for
the distribution and sale of prepaid mobile airtime and other prepaid products, as well as expenses
required to operate POS terminals. The decrease in direct operating costs is generally attributable
to the decrease in mobile operator commission revenues discussed above being largely passed on to
retail merchants resulting in lower commission costs, and changes in the mix of transactions to more
lower-cost transactions. This decrease was partly offset by the increase in transactions processed
and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar. The decrease in direct operating costs for the first half
of 2010 was less than the decrease for the second quarter of 2010 because the impact of the weaker
U.S. dollar was less pronounced in the second quarter of 2010 than in the first half of 2010.
21
Table of Contents
Gross profit
Gross profit, which represents revenues less direct costs, was $27.9 million for the second quarter
and $57.7 million for the first half of 2010 compared to $27.9 million for the second quarter and
$53.4 million for the first half of 2009. The primary cause of the increase in gross profit for the
first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 is the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar,
increased transaction volume in Germany and favorable product mix changes in the U.S., partly
offset by the impact of mobile operator commission rate decreases, primarily in Australia, and
transaction volume declines in the U.K. and Spain. Gross margin increased slightly to 20% for the
second quarter and first half of 2010 compared to 19% for the same periods in 2009. Gross profit
per transaction remained flat at $0.14 for the second quarter and first half of 2010 and 2009.
Salaries and benefits
The increase in salaries and benefits for the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009
is primarily due to additional overhead to support development in new and growing markets, certain
severance costs and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar. As a percentage of revenues, salaries and
benefits increased to 5.5% for the first half of 2010 from 4.7% for the first half of 2009.
Selling, general and administrative
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for the first half of 2010 compared to
the first half of 2009 is mainly due to the additional overhead to support development in new and
growing markets, the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar, professional fees related to due diligence,
recruiting and legal matters, and certain rebranding and marketing expenses incurred in the first half of
2010. As a percentage of revenues, these expenses increased to 4.5% for the first half of 2010
compared to 3.6% for the first half of 2009.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense primarily represents amortization of acquired intangible
assets and the depreciation of POS terminals we install in retail stores. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased for the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009 mainly
due to the growth in installed POS terminals in new and growing markets, primarily Italy, and the
impact of the weaker U.S. dollar. As a percentage of revenues, these expenses increased slightly to
2.8% for the first half of 2010 from 2.6% for the first half of 2009.
Operating income
Operating margin was 6.9% for the second quarter
and 7.6% for the first half of 2010 compared to 8.3% for the second quarter and 8.2% for the first
half of 2009. Operating income per transaction was $0.05 for the second quarter and first half of
2010 compared to $0.06 for the second quarter and first half of 2009.
The decreases in operating
income, operating margin and operating income per transaction for the first half of 2010 compared
to the first half of 2009 are mainly due to the increase in operating expenses discussed above,
partly offset by the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar.
22
Table of Contents
MONEY TRANSFER SEGMENT
The following tables present the results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 for the Money Transfer Segment:
Year-over-Year Change | Year-over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Increase | Increase | Six Months Ended | Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 60,051 | $ | 57,769 | $ | 2,282 | 4 | % | $ | 116,108 | $ | 110,737 | $ | 5,371 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
28,292 | 28,055 | 237 | 1 | % | 54,626 | 53,613 | 1,013 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
13,886 | 13,103 | 783 | 6 | % | 28,083 | 24,923 | 3,160 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
8,666 | 8,847 | (181 | ) | (2 | )% | 17,610 | 17,662 | (52 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and acquired intangible
assets impairment |
| | | n/m | | 9,884 | (9,884 | ) | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,967 | 5,083 | (116 | ) | (2 | )% | 10,057 | 9,845 | 212 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
55,811 | 55,088 | 723 | 1 | % | 110,376 | 115,927 | (5,551 | ) | (5 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 4,240 | $ | 2,681 | $ | 1,559 | 58 | % | $ | 5,732 | $ | (5,190 | ) | $ | 10,922 | n/m | ||||||||||||||||
Transactions processed (millions) |
4.7 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 4 | % | 9.0 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 6 | % |
n/m | - Not meaningful. |
Revenues
Revenues from the Money Transfer Segment include a transaction fee for each transaction, as well as
the difference between the price of foreign currency purchased at wholesale exchange rates and sold
to customers at retail exchange rates. The increase in revenues for the first half of 2010 compared
to revenues for the first half of 2009 is primarily due to the increase in the number of
transactions processed. For the first half of 2010, money transfers to Mexico, which represented
22% of total money transfers, decreased by 12% while transfers to all other countries increased 12%
when compared to the first half of 2009. The increase in transfers to countries other than Mexico
is due to the expansion of our agent and correspondent payout networks in non-U.S. markets. The
decline in transfers to Mexico was largely the result of downturns in certain labor markets and
other economic factors impacting the U.S. market, as well as immigration developments in the U.S.
These issues have also resulted in certain competitors lowering transaction fees and foreign
currency exchange spreads in certain markets where we do business in an attempt to limit the impact
on money transfer volumes. We have generally maintained our pricing structure in response to these
developments. We cannot predict how long these issues will continue to impact the U.S. market or
whether other markets will experience similar issues and we cannot predict whether we will change
our pricing strategy over the short or long term in order to protect or increase market share.
Revenues per transaction decreased to $12.78 for the second quarter and $12.90 for the first half
of 2010 from $12.84 for the second quarter and $13.03 for the first half of 2009. The growth rate
of revenues slightly lagged the transaction growth rate for the first half of 2010 largely as a
result of lower average amount transferred per transaction. This decrease was partly offset by the
continued shift in transaction mix to non-U.S. locations which generally have higher-than-average
revenues per transaction. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, 62% of our money transfers were
initiated in the U.S. and 38% in non-U.S. markets compared to 66% initiated in the U.S. and 34% in
non-U.S. markets for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We expect that the U.S. will continue to
represent our highest volume market; however, future growth is expected to be derived from the
addition of new products and the expansion of our agent and correspondent payout networks in new
and existing markets, primarily outside the U.S.
Direct operating costs
Direct operating costs in the Money Transfer Segment primarily represent commissions paid to agents
that originate money transfers on our behalf and distribution agents that disburse funds to the
customers destination beneficiary, together with less significant costs, such as telecommunication
costs and bank fees to collect money from originating agents. The increase in direct operating
costs in the first half of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily due to the growth
in transactions processed.
23
Table of Contents
Gross profit
Gross profit, which represents revenues less direct costs, was $31.8 million for the second quarter
and $61.5 million for the first half of 2010 compared to gross profit of $29.7 million for the
second quarter and $57.1 million for the first half of 2009. The improvements are primarily due to
the growth in money transfer transactions, the shift in transaction mix to transfers from
non-U.S. sources and the addition of new products. Gross margin was 53% for the second quarter and first half of 2010 compared to
51% for the second quarter and 52% for the first half of 2009. This improvement primarily reflects
the shift in transaction mix to transfers from non-U.S. sources, partly offset by lower revenues
per transaction.
Salaries and benefits
The increase in salaries and benefits for the first half of 2010 compared to the same period in
2009 is due to the increased expenditures we incurred to support expansion of our operations,
primarily internationally. As a percentage of revenues, salaries and benefits increased to 24% for
the first half of 2010 from 23% for the same period in 2009.
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first half of 2010 were nearly unchanged
compared to the first half of 2009, primarily as the result of our ability to leverage fixed
operating costs while expanding the business. As a percentage of
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
15% for the first half of 2010 from 16% for the same period in 2009.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $169.4 million related
to certain goodwill and intangible assets of the RIA money transfer business. This charge was an
estimate based on the assessment performed up to the filing date of our 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K. We completed the assessment in the first quarter of 2009 and recorded an additional $9.9
million non-cash impairment charge in the first quarter of 2009.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization primarily represents amortization of acquired intangible assets and
also includes depreciation of money transfer terminals, computers and software, leasehold
improvements and office equipment. For the second quarter and first half of 2010, depreciation and
amortization has remained relatively flat compared to the same periods in 2009, reflecting a shift
in achieving expansion more through agents which requires less capital expenditures than expansion
from adding company stores. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation
and amortization remained flat at 9% for the first half of 2010 and
2009.
Operating income (loss)
Excluding the goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment charge, operating income for the
first half of 2010 increased $1.0 million compared to the first half of 2009. This increase
reflects the growth in transactions processed, the shift in
transactions to non-U.S. markets, the addition of new products and
the leveraging of fixed costs, partly offset by increased salaries and benefits expenses to expand
internationally. Operating margin, excluding the goodwill and
acquired intangible assets impairment charge, increased to 5% for the
first half of 2010 from 4% for the same period in 2009.
24
Table of Contents
CORPORATE SERVICES
The following table presents the operating expenses for the three- and six-month periods ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 for Corporate Services:
Year-over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Year-over-Year Change | Six Months Ended | Increase | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Decrease | Decrease | June 30, | (Decrease) | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
$ | 3,545 | $ | 3,746 | $ | (201 | ) | (5 | )% | $ | 6,954 | $ | 7,086 | $ | (132 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
1,639 | 2,498 | (859 | ) | (34 | )% | 2,903 | 4,062 | (1,159 | ) | (29 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
277 | 323 | (46 | ) | (14 | )% | 656 | 636 | 20 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 5,461 | $ | 6,567 | $ | (1,106 | ) | (17 | )% | $ | 10,513 | $ | 11,784 | $ | (1,271 | ) | (11 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Corporate operating expenses
Operating expenses for Corporate Services decreased for the first half of 2010 compared to the
first half of 2009. The decrease in salaries and benefits is primarily the result of lower
incentive compensation accruals, largely offset by higher salaries and share-based compensation.
The increase in share-based compensation is due to the reversal of expense related to certain
performance-based awards during the first half of 2009. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses is due mainly to lower legal and acquisition-related professional fees.
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Year-over-Year Change | June 30, | Year-over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | 2010 | 2009 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 572 | $ | 885 | $ | (313 | ) | (35 | )% | $ | 1,127 | $ | 1,854 | $ | (727 | ) | (39 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,031 | ) | (6,653 | ) | 1,622 | (24 | )% | (9,985 | ) | (13,720 | ) | 3,735 | (27 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from unconsolidated
affiliates |
447 | 516 | (69 | ) | (13 | )% | 1,001 | 1,034 | (33 | ) | (3 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early retirement of debt |
| (150 | ) | 150 | (100 | )% | | (253 | ) | 253 | (100 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange
gain (loss), net |
(9,341 | ) | 9,650 | (18,991 | ) | n/m | (14,423 | ) | (941 | ) | (13,482 | ) | n/m | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
$ | (13,353 | ) | $ | 4,248 | $ | (17,601 | ) | n/m | $ | (22,280 | ) | $ | (12,026 | ) | $ | (10,254 | ) | n/m | |||||||||||||
n/m | - Not meaningful. |
Interest income
The decrease in interest income for the second quarter and first half of 2010 from the second
quarter and first half of 2009 is primarily due to a decline in short-term interest rates and a
decrease in average cash balances on hand during the respective periods.
Interest expense
The decrease in interest expense for the second quarter and first half of 2010 from the second
quarter and first half of 2009 is primarily related to the reductions in debt from scheduled and
early repayments on our term loan and repurchases of convertible debentures and reductions in
amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The decrease in interest expense is also
due to lower interest rates on our floating-rate debt obligations in the second quarter and first
half of 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009.
25
Table of Contents
Income from unconsolidated affiliates
Income from unconsolidated affiliates represents the equity in income of our 40% equity
investment in epay Malaysia and our 49% investment in Euronet Middle East. The decrease in income
is mainly the result of lower profitability of Euronet Middle East largely offset by improved
profitability of epay Malaysia.
Loss on early retirement of debt
In the first half of 2009, we repurchased in privately negotiated transactions $25.8 million in
principal amount of the 1.625% convertible debentures due 2024. Loss on early retirement of debt of
$0.3 million for the first half of 2009 represents the difference in the amounts paid for the
convertible debentures over their carrying amounts, as well as the pro-rata write-off of deferred
financing costs associated with the portion of the term loan that was prepaid during the first half
of 2009.
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net
Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the local currency of each of our
subsidiaries give rise to foreign currency exchange gains and losses. Exchange gains and losses
that result from re-measurement of these assets and liabilities are recorded in determining net
income. The majority of our foreign currency gains or losses are due to the re-measurement of
intercompany loans that are in a currency other than the functional currency of one of the parties
to the loan. For example, we make intercompany loans based in euros from our corporate division,
which is comprised of U.S. dollar functional currency entities, to certain European entities that
use the euro as the functional currency. As the U.S. dollar strengthens against the euro, foreign
currency losses are generated on our corporate entities because the number of euros to be received
in settlement of the loans decreases in U.S. dollar terms. Conversely, in this example, in periods
where the U.S. dollar weakens, our corporate entities will record foreign currency gains.
We recorded net foreign currency exchange losses of $9.3 million and $14.4 million in the second
quarter and first half of 2010, respectively, compared to a net foreign currency gain of $9.7
million in the second quarter of 2009 and a $0.9 million loss in the first half of 2009. These
realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses reflect the respective weakening
and strengthening of the U.S. dollar against most of the currencies of the countries in which we
operate during the respective periods.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Our effective tax rates as reported and as adjusted are calculated below:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 3,189 | $ | 22,272 | $ | 12,491 | $ | 15,696 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
4,344 | 6,397 | 10,131 | 11,714 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | (1,155 | ) | $ | 15,875 | $ | 2,360 | $ | 3,982 | |||||||
Effective income tax rate |
136.2 | % | 28.7 | % | 81.1 | % | 74.6 | % | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 3,189 | $ | 22,272 | $ | 12,491 | $ | 15,696 | ||||||||
Adjust: Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net |
(9,341 | ) | 9,650 | (14,423 | ) | (941 | ) | |||||||||
Adjust: Goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment |
| | | (9,884 | ) | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, as adjusted |
$ | 12,530 | $ | 12,622 | $ | 26,914 | $ | 26,521 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 4,344 | $ | 6,397 | $ | 10,131 | $ | 11,714 | ||||||||
Adjust: Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to foreign
currency exchange gain (loss), net |
(193 | ) | 485 | (376 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense, as adjusted |
$ | 4,537 | $ | 5,912 | $ | 10,507 | $ | 11,700 | ||||||||
Effective income tax rate, as adjusted |
36.2 | % | 46.8 | % | 39.0 | % | 44.1 | % | ||||||||
Our effective tax rates for continuing operations were 136.2% and 28.7% for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and were 81.1% and 74.6% for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The effective tax rates were significantly
influenced by the foreign currency exchange gains and losses in the respective periods and by the
goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment charge in the first quarter of 2009. Excluding
foreign currency exchange results and the impairment charge from pre-tax income, as well as the
related tax effects for these items, our effective tax rates were 36.2% and 46.8% for the three
26
Table of Contents
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 39.0% and 44.1% for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The increase in the effective tax rate, as adjusted, for the second quarter of 2010 compared
to the applicable statutory rate of 35% is primarily related to our U.S. tax position. For the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, we have recorded a valuation allowance against
our U.S. federal tax net operating losses as it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not
be realized. Accordingly, the federal income tax benefit associated with pre-tax book losses
generated by our U.S. entities has not been recognized in these periods. For the second quarter of
2010, this increase was partly offset by a $1.0 million adjustment to the reserve related to
deferred tax assets generated from prior U.S. net operating losses. Additionally, the effective tax
rate for the first half of 2010 is lower due to a $0.8 million adjustment related to a foreign tax
law change.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, as adjusted, income tax expense, as adjusted
and effective income tax rate, as adjusted are non-GAAP financial measures that management believes
are useful for understanding why our effective tax rates are significantly different than would be
expected.
OTHER
Discontinued operations, net
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we sold Essentis in order to focus our investments and resources
on our transaction processing businesses. Accordingly, Essentiss results of operations are shown
as discontinued operations in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $0.3 million for the second quarter and
$1.0 million for the first half of 2010 compared to $0.5 million for the second quarter and $0.8
million for the first half of 2009. Noncontrolling interests represents the elimination of net
income or loss attributable to the minority shareholders portion of our consolidated subsidiaries
that are not wholly-owned. Our subsidiaries which are not wholly-owned are summarized in the table
below:
Percent | ||||||
Subsidiary | Owned | Segment - Country | ||||
Movilcarga
|
80 | % | epay Spain | |||
e-pay SRL
|
51 | % | epay Italy | |||
ATX
|
51 | % | epay various | |||
Euronet China
|
75 | % | EFT China |
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO EURONET WORLDWIDE, INC.
Net loss attributable to Euronet Worldwide, Inc. was $1.5 million for the second quarter of 2010
and net income attributable to Euronet Worldwide, Inc. was $1.3 million for the first half of 2010
compared to net income of $15.5 million for the second quarter and $3.2 million for the first half
of 2009. As more fully discussed above, the decrease of $1.9 million for the first half of 2010 as
compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily the result of the $13.5 million increase in
foreign currency exchange losses, partly offset by the $7.0 increase in operating income which is
largely the result of the $9.9 million goodwill and acquired intangible assets impairment charge in
the first half of 2009. Additionally, net interest expense decreased $3.0 million and income tax
expense decreased $1.6 million in the first half of 2010.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Working capital
As of June 30, 2010, we had working capital, which is calculated as the difference between total
current assets and total current liabilities, of $149.3 million, compared to working capital
of $167.0 million as of December 31, 2009. Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities
was 1.33 as of June 30, 2010, compared to 1.34 as of December 31, 2009. The decrease in working
capital was primarily due to the use of cash to reduce revolving credit facility borrowings.
We require substantial working capital to finance operations. The Money Transfer Segment funds the
correspondent distribution network before receiving the benefit of amounts collected from customers
by agents. Working capital needs increase due to weekends and international banking holidays. As a
result, we may report more or less working capital for the Money Transfer Segment based solely upon
the day on which the fiscal period ends. As of June 30, 2010, working capital in the Money Transfer
Segment was $60.5 million. We expect that working capital needs will increase as we expand this
business. The epay Segment produces positive working capital, but
27
Table of Contents
much of it is restricted in connection with the administration of its customer collection and
vendor remittance activities. The EFT Processing Segment does not require substantial working
capital.
Operating cash flow
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $88.0 million for the first half of 2010 compared
to $50.0 million for the first half of 2009. The increase is primarily due to fluctuations in
working capital primarily associated with the timing of the settlement processes with mobile
operators in the epay Segment and with correspondents in the Money Transfer Segment, in addition to
payments made in the first half of 2009 to secure an exclusive, long-term distribution agreement
with a vendor in Australia.
Investing activity cash flow
Cash flows used in investing activities were $14.6 million for the first half of 2010, compared to
$28.4 million for the first half of 2009. Our investing activities included $12.4 million and $16.8
million for purchases of property and equipment in the first half of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Additionally, the first half of 2009 included $10.0 million in cash used for acquisitions. Finally,
cash used for software development and other investing activities totaled $2.1 million in the first
half of 2010 and $1.6 million in the first half of 2009.
Financing activity cash flow
Cash flows used in financing activities were $42.3 million during the first half of 2010 compared
to $44.4 million during the first half of 2009. Our financing activities for the first half of 2010
consisted primarily of net repayments of debt obligations of $42.7 million compared to $42.1
million for the first half of 2009. To support the short-term cash needs of our Money Transfer
Segment, we generally borrow amounts under the revolving credit facility several times each month
to fund the correspondent network in advance of collecting remittance amounts from the agency
network. These borrowings are repaid over a very short period of time, generally within a few days.
Primarily as a result of this, during the first half of 2010 we had a total of $108.0 million in
borrowings and $147.2 million in repayments under our revolving credit facility. During the first
half of 2010, we paid $2.2 million for repayments and early retirements of debt obligations and
$1.3 million for capital lease obligations. Additionally, we paid $1.7 million and $2.4 million of
dividends to noncontrolling interests stockholders in the first half of 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Expected future financing and investing cash requirements primarily depend on our acquisition
activity and the related financing needs.
Other sources of capital
Credit Facility In connection with completing the April 2007 acquisition of RIA, we
entered into a $290 million secured credit facility consisting of a $190 million seven-year term
loan, which was fully drawn at closing, and a $100 million five-year revolving credit facility
(together, the Credit Facility). The term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points or
prime plus 100 basis points and requires that we repay $1.9 million of the balance each year, with
the remaining balance payable at the end of the seven-year term. We have prepaid amounts on this
loan and we estimate that we will be able to repay the remaining $128.0 term loan prior to its
maturity date through cash flows available from operations, provided our operating cash flows are
not required for future business developments. Up front financing costs of $4.8 million were
deferred and are being amortized over the terms of the respective loans.
The revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR or prime plus a margin that adjusts each
quarter based upon our Consolidated EBITDA ratio as defined in the Credit Facility agreement. We
intend to use the revolving credit facility primarily to fund working capital requirements, which
are expected to increase as we expand the Money Transfer business. Based on our current projected
working capital requirements, we anticipate that our revolving credit facility will be sufficient
to fund our working capital needs.
We may be required to repay our obligations under the Credit Facility six months before any
potential repurchase dates, the first being October 15, 2012, under our $175 million 3.50%
Convertible Debentures Due 2025, unless we are able to demonstrate that either: (i) we could borrow
unsubordinated funded debt equal to the principal amount of the convertible debentures while
remaining in compliance with the financial covenants in the Credit Facility or (ii) we will have
sufficient liquidity to meet repayment requirements (as determined by the administrative agent and
the lenders). These and other material terms and conditions applicable to the Credit Facility are
described in the agreement governing the Credit Facility.
The term loan may be expanded by up to an additional $150 million and the revolving credit facility
can be expanded by up to an additional $25 million, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions
including pro forma debt covenant compliance.
As of June 30, 2010, we had borrowings of $128.0 million outstanding under the term loan. We had no
borrowings and $35.9 million of stand-by letters of credit outstanding under the revolving credit
facility. The remaining $64.1 million under the revolving credit facility was available for
borrowing. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are being used to fund short-term working
capital requirements in the U.S. and India. As of June 30, 2010, our weighted average interest rate
was 2.3% under the term loan, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs.
28
Table of Contents
Short-term debt obligations Short-term debt obligations at June 30, 2010 were primarily
comprised of the $1.9 million annual repayment requirement under the term loan. Certain of our
subsidiaries also have available credit lines and overdraft facilities to supplement short-term
working capital requirements, when necessary, and there were $0.6 million outstanding under these
facilities as of June 30, 2010.
We believe that the short-term debt obligations can be funded through cash generated from
operations, together with cash on hand or borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Convertible debt We have $175 million in principal amount of 3.50% Convertible Debentures
Due 2025 that are convertible into 4.3 million shares of Euronet common stock at a conversion price
of $40.48 per share upon the occurrence of certain events (relating to the closing prices of
Euronet common stock exceeding certain thresholds for specified periods). The debentures may not be
redeemed by us until October 20, 2012, but are redeemable at par at any time thereafter. Holders of
the debentures have the option to require us to purchase their debentures at par on October 15,
2012, 2015 and 2020, or upon a change in control of the Company. On the maturity date, these
debentures can be settled in cash or Euronet common stock, at our option, at predetermined
conversion rates.
Should holders of the 3.50% convertible debentures require us to repurchase their debentures on the
dates outlined above, we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient cash on hand or have
acceptable financing options available to us to fund these required repurchases. An inability to be
able to finance these potential repayments could have an adverse impact on our operations. These
terms and other material terms and conditions applicable to the convertible debentures are set
forth in the indenture agreement governing the debentures.
Other uses of capital
Payment obligations related to acquisitions We have potential contingent obligations to
the former owner of the net assets of Movilcarga. Based upon presently available information, we do
not believe any additional payments will be required. The seller disputed this conclusion and
initiated arbitration as provided for in the purchase agreement. A global public accounting firm
was engaged as an independent expert to review the results of the computation, but procedures for
such review have never been commenced, principally because the seller is in a bankruptcy
proceeding. Any additional payments, if ultimately determined to be owed the seller, will be
recorded as additional goodwill and could be made in either cash or a combination of cash and
Euronet common stock at our option.
In connection with the acquisition of Brodos Romania, we agreed to contingent consideration
arrangements based on the achievement of certain performance criteria. If the criteria are
achieved, we would have to pay a total of $2.5 million in cash or 75,489 shares of Euronet common
stock, at the option of the seller. However, Brodos Romania failed to achieve the performance
criteria by January 2010 for the first $1.25 million and based on its current performance, it is
unlikely to achieve the performance criteria during 2010 for the remaining amounts.
Capital expenditures and needs Total capital expenditures for the first half of 2010 were
$12.8 million. These capital expenditures were primarily for the purchase of ATMs to meet
contractual requirements in Poland, India and China, the purchase and installation of ATMs in key
under-penetrated markets, the purchase of POS terminals for the epay and Money Transfer Segments,
and office, data center and company store computer equipment and software, including capital
expenditures for the purchase and development of the necessary processing systems and capabilities
to expand the cross-border merchant processing and acquiring business. Total capital expenditures
for 2010 are currently estimated to be approximately $30 million to $40 million.
In the epay Segment, approximately 107,000 of the approximately 515,000 POS devices that we operate
are Company-owned, with the remaining terminals being operated as integrated cash register devices
of our major retail customers or owned by the retailers. As our epay Segment expands, we will
continue to add terminals in certain independent retail locations at a price of approximately $300
per terminal. We expect the proportion of owned terminals to total terminals operated to remain
relatively constant.
At current and projected cash flow levels, we anticipate that cash generated from operations,
together with cash on hand and amounts available under our revolving credit facility and other
existing and potential future financing will be sufficient to meet our debt, leasing, contingent
acquisition and capital expenditure obligations. If our capital resources are not sufficient to
meet these obligations, we will seek to refinance our debt and/or issue additional equity under
terms acceptable to us. However, we can offer no assurances that we will be able to obtain
favorable terms for the refinancing of any of our debt or other obligations or for the issuance of
additional equity.
Other trends and uncertainties
ATM outsourcing agreements Our contracts in the EFT Processing Segment tend to cover
large numbers of ATMs, so significant increases and decreases in our pool of managed ATMs may
result from entry into or termination of these management contracts. Banks have historically been
very deliberate in negotiating these agreements and have evaluated a wide range of matters when
deciding to choose an outsource vendor. Generally, the process of negotiating a new agreement is
subject to extensive management analysis and approvals and the process typically takes six to
twelve months or longer. Increasing consolidation in the banking industry could make this process
less predictable.
29
Table of Contents
Our existing contracts generally have terms of five to seven years and a number of them will expire
or be up for renewal each year for the next few years. As a result, we expect to be regularly
engaged in discussions with one or more of our customer banks to either obtain renewal of, or
restructure, our ATM outsourcing agreements. For contracts that we are able to renew, as was the
case for contract renewals in Romania and Greece in prior years, we expect customers to seek rate
concessions or up-front payments because of the greater availability of alternative processing
solutions in many of our markets now, as compared to when we originally entered into the contracts.
While we have been successful in many cases in obtaining new terms that preserve the same level of
earnings arising from the agreements, we have not been successful in all cases and, therefore, we
expect to experience reductions in revenues in future quarters arising from the expiration or
restructuring of agreements.
Inflation and functional currencies
Generally, the countries in which we operate have experienced low and stable inflation in recent
years. Therefore, the local currency in each of these markets is the functional currency.
Currently, we do not believe that inflation will have a significant effect on our results of
operations or financial position. We continually review inflation and the functional currency in
each of the countries where we operate.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
On occasion, we grant guarantees of the obligations of subsidiaries and we sometimes enter into
agreements with unaffiliated third parties that contain indemnification provisions, the terms of
which may vary depending on the negotiated terms of each respective agreement. Our liability under
such indemnification provisions may be subject to time and materiality limitations, monetary caps
and other conditions and defenses. As of June 30, 2010, there were no material changes from the
disclosure in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. To date, we are
not aware of any significant claims made by the indemnified parties or parties to whom we have
provided guarantees on behalf of our subsidiaries and, accordingly, no liabilities have been
recorded as of June 30, 2010. See also Note 10, Guarantees, to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
As of June 30, 2010, the only material change from the disclosure relating to contractual
obligations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, is
the $39.2 million net reduction of debt under our revolving credit facilities.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).
All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this document are
forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the following:
| trends affecting our business plans, financing plans and requirements; | |
| trends affecting our business; | |
| the adequacy of capital to meet our capital requirements and expansion plans; | |
| the assumptions underlying our business plans; | |
| our ability to repay indebtedness; | |
| business strategy; | |
| government regulatory action; | |
| technological advances; and | |
| projected costs and revenues. |
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct.
Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the words believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, estimate and similar expressions.
Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may materially differ from those in
the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to,
conditions in world financial markets and general economic conditions; technological developments
affecting the market for our products and services; foreign currency exchange fluctuations; our
ability to renew existing contracts at profitable rates; changes in laws and regulations affecting
our business, including immigration laws, and those referred to above and as set forth and more
fully described in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. We do not intend, and do not undertake, any obligation to update any
forward looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such
statements.
30
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk
As of June 30, 2010, our total debt outstanding was $289.2 million. Of this amount, $157.4 million,
or 54% of our total debt obligations, relates to contingent convertible debentures having a fixed
coupon rate. Our $175 million principal amount of contingent convertible debentures, issued in
October 2005, accrue cash interest at a rate of 3.50% of the principal amount per annum. Based on
quoted market prices, as of June 30, 2010, the fair value of our fixed rate convertible debentures
was $160.1 million, compared to a carrying value of $157.4 million. Interest expense for these
debentures, including accretion and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs, totals
approximately $13.8 million per year, or a weighted average interest rate of 8.9% annually.
Additionally, approximately $3.1 million, or 1% of our total debt obligations, relate to
capitalized leases with fixed payment and interest terms that expire between 2010 and 2014.
The remaining $128.7 million, or 45% of our total debt obligations, relates to debt that accrues
interest at variable rates. If we were to maintain these borrowings for one year, and maximize the
potential borrowings available under the revolving credit facility for one year, including the
$25.0 million in potential additional expanded borrowings, a 1% increase in the applicable interest
rate would result in additional interest expense to the Company of approximately $2.2 million. This
computation excludes the potential additional $150.0 million under the term loan because of the
limited circumstances under which the additional amounts would be available to us for borrowing.
Our excess cash is invested in instruments with original maturities of three months or less;
therefore, as investments mature and are reinvested, the amount we earn will increase or decrease
with changes in the underlying short term interest rates.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
For the first half of 2010, 76% of our revenues were generated in non-U.S. dollar countries
compared to 74% for the first half of 2009. We expect to continue generating a significant portion
of our revenues in countries with currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
We are particularly vulnerable to fluctuations in exchange rates of the U.S. dollar to the
currencies of countries in which we have significant operations, primarily the euro, British pound,
Australian dollar and Polish zloty. As of June 30, 2010, we estimate that a 10% fluctuation in
these foreign currency exchange rates would have the combined annualized effect on reported net
income and working capital of approximately $20 million to $30 million. This effect is estimated by
applying a 10% adjustment factor to our non-U.S. dollar results from operations, intercompany loans
that generate foreign currency gains or losses and working capital balances that require
translation from the respective functional currency to the U.S. dollar reporting currency.
Additionally, we have other non-current, non-U.S. dollar assets and liabilities on our balance
sheet that are translated to the U.S. dollar during consolidation. These items primarily represent
goodwill and intangible assets recorded in connection with acquisitions in countries other than the
U.S. We estimate that a 10% fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates would have a non-cash
impact on total comprehensive income of approximately $40 million to $50 million as a result of the
change in value of these items during translation to the U.S. dollar. For the fluctuations
described above, a strengthening U.S. dollar produces a financial loss, while a weakening U.S.
dollar produces a financial gain. We believe this quantitative measure has inherent limitations and
does not take into account any governmental actions or changes in either customer purchasing
patterns or our financing or operating strategies. Because a majority of our revenues and expenses
are incurred in the functional currencies of our international operating entities, the profits we
earn in foreign currencies are positively impacted by the weakening of the U.S. dollar and
negatively impacted by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. Additionally, our debt obligations are
primarily in U.S. dollars, therefore, as foreign currency exchange rates fluctuate, the amount
available for repayment of debt will also increase or decrease.
We are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk in our Money Transfer Segment. A
majority of the money transfer business involves receiving and disbursing different currencies, in
which we earn a foreign currency spread based on the difference between buying currency at
wholesale exchange rates and selling the currency to consumers at retail exchange rates. This
spread provides some protection against currency fluctuations that occur while we are holding the
foreign currency. Our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates is limited by the fact
that disbursement occurs for the majority of transactions shortly after they are initiated.
Additionally, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts to help offset foreign currency
exposure related to the notional value of money transfer transactions collected in currencies other
than the U.S. dollar. As of June 30, 2010, we had foreign currency forward contracts outstanding
with a notional value of $41.3 million, primarily in euros and U.S. dollars, that were not
designated as hedges and mature in a weighted average of 4.1 days. The fair value of these forward
contracts as of June 30, 2010 was an unrealized gain of less than $0.1 million, which was partially
offset by the unrealized loss on the related foreign currency receivables.
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our executive management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act as of June 30, 2010. Based on this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the design and
operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules
and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
CHANGE IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter
of 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is from time to time a party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of its
business.
Currently, there are no legal proceedings that management believes, either individually or in the
aggregate, would have a material adverse effect upon the consolidated results of operations or
financial condition of the Company.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as updated in our subsequent
filings with the SEC before making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, are
not the only ones facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us
or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the risks
identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by any subsequent Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline
substantially. This Quarterly Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the
forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including the risks described in our
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC.
32
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Stock repurchases
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company purchased, in accordance with the 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated), 876 shares of its common stock for participant income tax
withholding in conjunction with the lapse of restrictions on stock awards, as requested by the
participants. The following table sets forth information with respect to those shares (all
purchases occurred during May 2010):
Total Number | ||||||||||||||||
of Shares | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased as | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
Total | Average | Part of Publicly | of Shares that May | |||||||||||||
Number of | Price Paid | Announced | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares | Per Share | Plans or | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | (1) | Programs | Programs | ||||||||||||
May 1 - May 31 |
876 | $ | 14.67 | | | |||||||||||
Total |
876 | $ | 14.67 | | | |||||||||||
(1) | The price paid per share is the closing price of the shares on the vesting date. |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
In the second quarter of 2009, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice
(the DOJ) served Continental Exchange Solutions, Inc. d/b/a RIA Financial Services (CES), an
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, with a grand jury subpoena requesting documents
from CES and its affiliates in connection with an investigation into possible price collusion
related to money transmission services to the Dominican Republic (D.R.) during the period from
January 1, 2004 to the date of the subpoena. We acquired all of the stock of RIA Envia, Inc., the
parent of CES, in April 2007. CES foreign exchange transactions between the U.S and the D.R.
generated approximately 0.3% of our 2009 consolidated revenues. The Company and CES are fully
cooperating with the DOJ in its investigation.
We believe that, during the period covered by the DOJ investigation, CES generally derived part of
its charge for exchanging U.S. dollars into D.R. pesos from a reference rate recommended by
ADEREDI, a trade association in the D.R. composed of a CES subsidiary and other D.R. money transfer
firms. We further believe, however, that CES set its own service fee on the D.R. transactions
and its overall transaction price to customers. Customers were also free during this time period
to use CES and other firms to transmit dollars into the D.R., without conversion into D.R. pesos,
and we believe such transmissions occurred with increasing frequency over the course of this time
period.
At this time, we are unable to predict the outcome of the DOJ investigation, or, if charges were to
be brought against CES, the possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of any
such charges. Nor can we predict any potential effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition arising from such charges or potential collateral consequences, which could
include fines, penalties, limitations on or revocation of CESs license to engage in the money
transfer business in one or more states, and civil liability. In addition, we have incurred and
may continue to incur significant fees and expenses in connection with the DOJ investigation and
related matters.
33
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
a) Exhibits
The exhibits that are required to be filed or incorporated herein by reference are listed on the
Exhibit Index below.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Employment Agreement dated March 8, 2010 between Euronet Worldwide, Inc. and Charles T. Piper (1) | |
12.1
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (1) | |
31.1
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (1) | |
31.2
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (1) | |
32.1
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (2) | |
32.2
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (2) | |
101
|
The following materials from Euronet Worldwide, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010 and 2009, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and (v) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. (3) |
(1) | Filed herewith. | |
(2) | Pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is furnished rather than filed with this Form 10-Q. | |
(3) | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for puposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
PLEASE NOTE: Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we
have filed or incorporated by reference the agreements referenced above as exhibits to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The agreements have been filed to provide investors with information
regarding their respective terms. The agreements are not intended to provide any other factual
information about the Company or its business or operations. In particular, the assertions embodied
in any representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements may be subject to
qualifications with respect to knowledge and materiality different from those applicable to
investors and may be qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules not included
with the exhibits. These disclosure schedules may contain information that modifies, qualifies and
creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the agreements.
Moreover, certain representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements may have been used
for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties, rather than establishing matters as facts.
In addition, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and
covenants may have changed after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information
may or may not be fully reflected in the Companys public disclosures. Accordingly, investors
should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements as
characterizations of the actual state of facts about the Company or its business or operations on
the date hereof.
34
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
August 5, 2010
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
By:
|
/s/ MICHAEL J. BROWN | |||
Michael J. Brown | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
By:
|
/s/ RICK L. WELLER | |||
Rick L. Weller | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
35