EVmo, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2020 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020

or

[  ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _______

Commission File Number: 001-39132

YAYYO, INC.

(exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(310) 926-2643

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [  ] Non-accelerated filer [X] Smaller reporting company [X] Emerging growth company [X]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

31,981,374 shares of common stock, $0.000001 par value, as of August 5, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

YAYYO, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAYYO, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAYYO, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAYYO, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization and Line of Business

YayYo, Inc. (“YayYo” or the “Company”) was incorporated on June 21, 2016 under the laws of the state of Delaware originally as a limited liability company and subsequently changed to a C corporation. The accompanying financial statements are retroactively restated to present the Company as a C corporation from June 21, 2016. The Company rents cars to Uber and Lyft drivers.

Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

Risk and Uncertainties

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus surfaced in China, which has and is continuing to spread throughout the world, including the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” and on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a “pandemic”. The governors of New York, California and several other states, as well as mayors on many cities, have ordered their residents to cease traveling to non-essential jobs and to curtail all unnecessary travel, and to stay in their homes as much as possible in the coming weeks, as the nation confronts the escalating coronavirus outbreak, and similar restrictions have been recommended by the federal authorities and authorities in many other states and cities. Since the beginning of 2020 and the spread of COVID-19, rideshare companies have increasingly been negatively impacted. As Americans practice social distancing and self-isolation, Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare companies have seen a steep decline in ridership and revenue, as a result. Given that rideshare drivers are both at risk themselves and of risk to the public, and in addition to decreased demand overall, less people are even still driving. The Company has seen a decline in revenue during the first half of 2020 which is having a negative impact on the cash flows of the business, but saw a positive upward movement in revenue the latter part of the second quarter ended June 30, 2020. The Company has seen increased demand from drivers wanting to rent cars for ridesharing purposes and new drivers renting cars for both rideshare and delivery gig economy. With the recent increase in the number of positive COVID-19 cases, the Company is not able to predict the ultimate impact that COVID -19 will have on its business. If another lockdown were to occur, the Company could be forced to significantly scale back its business operations and its growth plans, and could ultimately have a significant negative impact on the Company. The Company cannot at this time estimate the long term effect of this unprecedented situation on the rideshare market or delivery gig economy in general or the Company in particular.

Interim financial statements

The unaudited interim financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosure are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These statements reflect all adjustment, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and notes thereto. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim report. Results of operations for the interim period are not indicative of annual results.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Distinct Cars, LLC, RideShare Car Rentals, LLC, RideYayYo, LLC and Savy, LLC. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. It is possible that accounting estimates and assumptions may be material to the Company due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment involved.

Cash Equivalents

For the purpose of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include time deposits, certificate of deposits, and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Equipment and Rental Vehicles

Equipment and Rental Vehicles are stated at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to earnings as incurred; additions, renewals and betterments are capitalized. When equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of equipment and rental vehicles is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets with estimated lives as follows:

Long-Lived Assets

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review at June 30, 2020, the Company determined that no impairment charge was necessary.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from renting its fleet of cars to Uber and Lyft drivers. Revenue is recognized based on the rental agreements which are generally on a weekly basis. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. ASC 740 requires a company to use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Under ASC 740, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees. There were 1,631,250 warrants and 716,000 options outstanding as of June 30, 2020.

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is based on the assumption that all dilutive securities are converted. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. There were 2,347,250 potentially dilutive securities outstanding at June 30, 2020.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses the cost of advertising as incurred. Advertising costs for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were $210,642 and $102,606, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company applies the provisions of ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

For certain financial instruments, the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and current liabilities, including convertible notes payable, each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest.

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company did not identify any liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2018-07, Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services and aligns most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. ASU 2018-07 is effective on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on its financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company adopted this ASU beginning on January 1, 2018 and used the modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes which amends ASC 740 Income Taxes (ASC 740). This update is intended to simplify accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC 740 and amending existing guidance to improve consistent application of ASC 740. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. The guidance in this update has various elements, some of which are applied on a prospective basis and others on a retrospective basis with earlier application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards could have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements. As new accounting pronouncements are issued, we will adopt those that are applicable under the circumstances.

Note 3 – Equipment

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 equipment consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 was $744 and $158, respectively.

Note 4 – Rental Vehicles

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, all of the Company’s rental vehicles consisted of the following:

The Company’s leased assets, consisting of vehicles, are depreciated over their estimated useful life of five years. Depreciation expense for leased assets for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 was $668,623 and $514,244, respectively. The lease terms are generally for 30 to 36 months and the Company has the right to purchase the leased assets at the end of the lease terms for generally a nominal amount.

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

Note 5 – Notes Payable

Notes payable at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 consisted of the following:

(A) In connection with the issuance of these notes payable in 2018 and 2017, the Company also issued an aggregate of 24,050 shares of its common stock to these note holders as additional incentive to make the loans. The aggregate relative fair value of these shares of common stock was $119,875 and was recorded as a discount on the note payable and as additional paid in capital. The discount of $119,875 is being amortized over the term of the notes payable. During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, $19,906 and $19,797, respectively, was charged to interest expense as amortization of the discounts, with an unamortized balance of $12,383 at June 30, 2020.

A rollforward of notes payable from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020 is below:

Note 6 – Lease Obligations

Lease obligations at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 consisted of the following:

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

A rollforward of lease obligations from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020 is below:

Future payments under lease obligations are as follows:

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity

The Company authorized 100,000,000 shares of capital stock with consists of 90,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.000001 par value per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.000001 par value per share.

Stock Options

The following is a summary of stock option activity:

The exercise price for options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2020:

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

The following is a summary of warrant activity:

The exercise price for warrants outstanding at June 30, 2020:

Note 8 – Related Party Transactions

During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company paid management fees of $0 and $120,000, respectively, to a company that is owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and director. Beginning on February 1, 2019, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with this individual and paid $167,000 under the consulting agreement. The consulting agreement was terminated effective September 1, 2019. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company’s CEO and director advanced the Company $150,000 and the Company repaid the amount in full. At June 30, 2020, $0 was owed to the Company’s CEO and director related to this advance.

During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company expensed $32,173 and $53,507, respectively, in advertising expenses from a company whose CEO was also a former director of the Company. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, $324,920 and $394,183, respectively, was owed to this company and is included in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

During the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company expensed $1,103,460 and $1,024,907, respectively, in insurance expense related to insuring the Company fleet of vehicles from an insurance brokerage firm whose owner is also a stockholder of the Company. At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, $201,156 and $171,665, respectively, was owed to this insurance brokerage from and is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Note 9 - Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may become involved in lawsuits and other legal proceedings that arise in the course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and it is not possible to predict the outcome of litigation with total confidence. The Company is currently not aware of any legal proceedings or potential claims against it whose outcome would be likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, or cash flows.

YAYYO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (unaudited)

Social Reality Inc. v. YayYo, Inc.

This action was filed on February 11, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Social Reality Inc. is a media company that claims to have provided media services to the Company. Plaintiff has sued the Company for breach of contract and related causes of action, arising from its claims that the Company has failed to pay for past outstanding invoices for services rendered. The plaintiff has also filed a motion for prejudgment attachment which was heard on July 28, 2020. The Superior Court denied the writ of attachment on the merits. The parties have a case management conference scheduled for August 18, 2020. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to the lawsuit, and expects to file counterclaims that will offset or negate any monies owed to plaintiff; it will vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Anthony Davis v. YayYo, Inc., and Ramy El-Batrawi

This action was filed on March 5, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Anthony Davis was hired by the Company as its Chief Executive Officer in or about December 2016, although he worked there for only a matter of months. Mr. El-Batrawi is the founder of the Company and our current Chief Executive Officer and director, and was involved, the complaint alleges, in Plaintiff’s hiring. As part of his compensation, Mr. Davis claims that he expected to receive stock options in the Company. He has alleged that “after several months of unsuccessfully attempting to persuade the Company’s founder to implement certain protocols and procedures” Davis resigned from his executive officer and director positions, and entered into a written settlement agreement with the Company as a consultant. Mr. Davis claims that the Company breached its agreement to award him certain stock options and includes a claim for wage and hour violations. The lawsuit also includes a request for declaratory and injunctive relief. Davis also included a claim under California Unfair Practices Act. The Company denies liability and asserts that it has paid Davis all amounts due to him under the contract, and that Davis failed to exercise his stock options before they expired on December 31, 2018. It intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit, and has agreed to pursue mediation pursuant to the contract with plaintiff.

Ivan Rung v. YayYo, Inc., Ramy El-Batrawi, et al., 20STCV27876

This action was filed on July 22, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Ivan Rung claims to have purchased the Company’s stock and purports to bring a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of YayYo’s stock pursuant to the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with YayYo’s November 14, 2019 initial public stock offering (IPO”). Mr. El-Batrawi is the founder and current CEO of the Company but at the time of the IPO was only a shareholder of the Company having stepped down as CEO, Director and a controlling shareholder of the Company. The complaint is vague about alleged misrepresentation and material omissions, detailing instead a supposed chronology of events leading to the Company’s voluntary decision to delist its stock from NASDAQ, a decision the Company announced in an 8K filed on February10, 2020. The Company denies liability and asserts that it accurately and completely disclosed all materially adverse facts and occurrences in its Registration Statement, related public filings and other public statements, and the Complaint’s alleged violations of Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 are baseless. It intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Michael Vanbecelaere v. YayYo, Inc., Ramy El-Batrawi, et al., 20STCV28066

This action was filed on July 23, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, also as a purported class action. Plaintiff Michael Vanbecelaere claims to have purchased the Company’s stock “traceable to the IPO” and like Rung, brings a securities class action pursuant to Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of all purchasers of YayYo’s stock. The complaint like the preceding action, Ivan Rung v. YayYo, Inc., Ramy El-Batrawi, et al., 20STCV27876 (“Rung”) alleges false statements and material omission pursuant to the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with YayYo’s November 14, 201 9 initial public stock offering (IPO). The defendants are identical to the defendants in the action filed the day before, on July 22, 2020. The two complaints are virtual cookie cutter versions of each other including a false allegation of fact about YayYo that appears in an identical paragraph 13: “On or about June 21, 2016, defendant EI-Batrawi incorporated YayYo in Delaware. The Company then rented cars to Uber and Lyft drivers.” (The business model of YayYo was different on June 21, 2016.) As with the Rung case, the Company denies liability and asserts that it accurately and completely disclosed all materially adverse facts, events and occurrences in its Registration Statement and related public filings, and the Complaint’s alleged violations of Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 are baseless. The actions will be “low numbered” to the same Superior Court judge and consolidated. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Note 10 – Subsequent Events

In July 2020, the Company issued a total of 2,505,000 stock options to officers, directors and employees. Included in the total options issued were: 1,000,000 to the CEO; 750,000 to the COO; 250,000 to the CFO and 5,000 each to four independent directors.

In July 2020, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Laurie DiGiovanni, the Company’s COO for an annual salary of $200,000 plus 750,000 stock options that become fully vested over three years.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made herein, as well as in other filings we make with the SEC and other written and oral information we release, regarding our future performance constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion of business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and therefore, there can be no assurance the forward-looking statements included herein will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those described in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and as also may be described from time to time in future reports we file with the SEC. You should read such information in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report. There also may be other factors that we cannot anticipate or that are not described in this report, generally because we do not currently perceive them to be material. Such factors could cause results to differ materially from our expectations.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update these statements other than as required by law. You are advised, however, to review any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our periodic filings with the SEC.

Our Corporate History and Background

The Company was formed on June 21, 2016 under the name “YayYo, LLC,” which was converted into a Delaware corporation pursuant to the unanimous written consent of our former manager and members in a transaction intended to be tax-free under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Conversion”). All of YayYo, LLC’s liabilities and assets, including its intellectual property, were automatically transferred to the Company and the Company has assumed ownership of such assets and liabilities. The Company now operates as a “C” corporation formed under the laws of the State of Delaware.

The Company is a holding company operating through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Distinct Cars, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Distinct Cars”) and Rideshare Car Rentals LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Rideshare”).

On August 12, 2017, we announced that we were shifting our primary corporate focus in the transportation/ridesharing industry away from the development of the Metasearch App.

The Company’s operating business divisions include (i) an online rideshare vehicle booking platform to service the ridesharing economy through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Rideshare (the “Rideshare Platform”), and (ii) the maintenance of a fleet of standard passenger vehicles to be made commercially available for rent through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Distinct Cars (“Fleet Management”). Through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Rideshare and Distinct Cars, the Company seeks to become the leading provider of a standard rental vehicles to drivers in the ridesharing economy.

On March 16, 2018, we closed our Regulation A+ offering under Regulation A of the Securities Act, which was qualified by the SEC on March 15, 2017. We sold a total of 365,306 shares of our common stock. We received cash proceeds of $1.8 million, net of commissions and other costs associated with the gross offering proceeds or payable by us.

On November 15, 2019, the Company closed its initial public offering of 2,625,000 common shares at $4.00 per share, for gross proceeds, before underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses, of $10.5 million. and the shares became listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “YAYO”.

On February 10, 2020, the Company notified Nasdaq of its intent to voluntarily delist its Common Stock from Nasdaq. In connection therewith, the Company notified Nasdaq of the Company’s intention to file a Form 25 with the SEC on or about February 20, 2020. The Company elected to effect the voluntary delisting of its common stock after discussions with Nasdaq’s staff, and based on the determination of the Company’s board of directors that voluntarily delisting the Common Stock from Nasdaq was in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Following delisting from Nasdaq, the Company’s Common Stock now trades on the OTC Pink Market under the trading symbol, “YAYO.”

Impact of COVID-19 on our business

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus surfaced in China, which has and is continuing to spread throughout the world, including the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” and on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a “pandemic.” The governors of New York, California and several other states, as well as mayors on many cities, have ordered their residents to cease traveling to non-essential jobs and to curtail all unnecessary travel, and to stay in their homes as much as possible in the coming weeks, as the nation confronts the escalating coronavirus outbreak, and similar restrictions have been recommended by the federal authorities and authorities in many other states and cities. Since the beginning of 2020 and the spread of COVID-19, rideshare companies have increasingly been negatively impacted. According to its recent investor update call, Uber’s gross bookings in Seattle are down by 60-70%, and Uber assumes similar declines in other big cities hit by COVID-19. As Americans practice social distancing and self-isolation, Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare companies have seen a steep decline in ridership and revenue, as a result. Given that rideshare drivers are both at risk themselves and of risk to the public, and in addition to decreased demand overall, less people are even still driving. The Company has seen a decline in revenue during the first half of 2020 which is having a negative impact on the cash flows of the business, but saw a positive upward movement in revenue the latter part of the second quarter ended June 30, 2020. The Company has seen increased demand from drivers wanting to rent cars for ridesharing purposes and new drivers renting cars for both rideshare and delivery gig economy. With the recent increase in the number of positive COVID-19 cases, the Company is not able to predict the ultimate impact that COVID -19 will have on its business. If another lockdown were to occur, the Company could be forced to significantly scale back its business operations and its growth plans, and could ultimately have a significant negative impact on the Company. The Company cannot at this time estimate the long term effect of this unprecedented situation on the rideshare market or delivery gig economy in general or the Company in particular.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries Distinct Cars, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Distinct Cars”), Savy LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Savy”), Rideyayyo LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Rideyayyo”) and Rideshare Car Rentals LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Rideshare”). Savy and Rideyayyo have not had operations to date.

Consolidated Results of Operations—Three Months Ended June 30, 2020, Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2019.

Total Revenues.

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $1,580,555, a decrease of $116,362 or 6.9% compared to revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 of $1,696,917. The decrease is due to us not being able to maintain our average weekly rental income levels due to the COVID-19 outbreak. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the average weekly rental income per vehicle placed in service was $292 compared to $331 for the same period in 2019. Our revenues declined in March and April due to COVID -19 and began to recover in May and June 2020. Our revenue for the month of June was back to pre-COVID-19 levels, but there is no assurance that this trend will continue.

Cost of Revenues.

The principal components of costs of revenue are depreciation of the vehicles, vehicle insurance and maintenance.

Cost of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2020 were $1,295,059, an increase of $332,988 or 34.6% compared to cost of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2019 of $962,071. The increase is due to higher depreciation expense due to an increase in fleet size and higher repairs and maintenance due to the age of the fleet. For the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 our cost of revenue was 81.9% and 56.7% of our revenue, respectively. The increase in the cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue is due to the decrease in average weekly rental income due to the COVID – 19 outbreak.

Selling and Marketing Expenses.

Selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2020 were $79,153, representing an increase of $58,265 or 279.2% over the three months ended June 30, 2019 of $20,868. The increase is due to an increase in advertising our rentals to Uber and Lyft drivers.

General and Administrative Expenses.

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2020 were $861,410, representing an increase of $185,782 or 27.5% over the three months ended June 30, 2019 of $675,628. The increase is principally due to higher payroll costs as we hired additional personnel for our expanding operations and higher management salaries; and higher occupancy costs.

Loss on the settlement of debt

Loss on the settlement of debt for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $0 as compared to $12,900 for the same period in 2019. During the months ended June 30, 2019, we settled outstanding debt of $21,500 with 4,300 shares of common stock valued at $34,400.

.

Total Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2020 were $940,543, representing an increase of $231,147 or 32.6% compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019 of $709,396. The increase is due to the reasons described above.

Interest expense, net

Interest and financing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2020 were $67,795 compared to $442,902 for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in interest and financing cost for the three months ended June 30, 2020 due to a decrease in high interest rate debt outstanding.

Net Loss

The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $722,842, representing an increase of $305,390 or 73.2% compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019 of $417,452. The increase is due to the reasons described above.

Consolidated Results of Operations—Six Months Ended June 30, 2020, Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2019.

Total Revenues.

Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $3,328,197, a decrease of $147,321 or 4.2% compared to revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $3,475,518. The decrease is due to us not being able to maintain our average weekly rental income levels due to the COVID-19 outbreak. During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the average weekly rental income per vehicle placed in service was $309 compared to $341 for the same period in 2019. Our revenues declined in March and April due to COVID -19 and began to recover in May and June 2020. Our revenue for the month of June was back to pre-COVID-19 levels, but there is no assurance that this trend will continue.

Cost of Revenues.

Cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2020 were $2,696,350, an increase of $652,109 or 31.9% compared to cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $2,044,241. The increase is due to higher depreciation expense due to an increase in fleet size and higher repairs and maintenance due to the age of the fleet. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 our cost of revenue was 81.0% and 58.8% of our revenue, respectively. The increase in the cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue is due to the decrease in average weekly rental income due to the COVID – 19 outbreak.

Selling and Marketing Expenses.

Selling and marketing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2020 were $210,642, representing an increase of $108,036 or 105.3% over the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $102,606. The increase is due to an increase in advertising our rentals to Uber and Lyft drivers.

General and Administrative Expenses.

General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2020 were $2,757,616, representing an increase of $1,296,805 or 88.8% over the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $1,460,811. The increase is principally due to higher payroll costs (including stock option expense) as we hired additional personnel for our expanding operations and higher management salaries; and higher occupancy costs.

Loss on the settlement of debt

Loss on the settlement of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $0 as compared to $252,900 for the same period in 2019. During the months ended June 30, 2019, we settled outstanding debt of $421,500 with 84,300 shares of common stock valued at $674,400.

.

Total Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2020 were $2,968,258, representing an increase of $1,151,941 or 63.4% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $1,816,317. The increase is due to the reasons described above.

Interest expense, net

Interest and financing expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2020 were $147,651 compared to $611,875 for the six months ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in interest and financing cost for the six months ended June 30, 2020 due to a decrease in outstanding debt.

Net Loss

The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was $2,484,062, representing an increase of $1,487,147 or 149.2% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 of $996,915. The increase is due to the reasons described above.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Plan of Operations

Current Assets, Liabilities and Working Capital

Initial Public Offering. On November 15, 2019, we closed our initial public offering of common stock registered on an S-1 Registration Statement under the Securities Act, which was declared effective on November 13, 2019. We sold a total of 2,625,000 common shares at a price of $4.00 per share. Total gross proceeds from the offering were $10,500,000, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses.

Current Assets, Liabilities and Working Capital. At June 30, 2020, the Company’s current assets totaled $696,206, current liabilities totaled $3,991,172, and working capital was a deficit of $3,294,966. At December 31, 2019, the Company’s current assets totaled $2,098,660, current liabilities totaled $2,655,055, and working capital was a deficit of $556,395.

Regarding current liabilities, the amounts categorized as accounts payable and accrued expenses totaled $1,700,314 and $951,231 as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, an increase of $749,083 or 78.7%.

Since inception, our principal sources of operating funds have been proceeds from equity financing including the sale of our common stock to initial investors known to management and principal shareholders of the Company. We do not expect that our current cash on hand will fund our existing operations and future business growth. We will need to raise additional capital in order execute our business plan and growth goals for at least the next twelve-month period thereafter. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient additional funds, it will have to execute a slower than planned growth path, reduce overhead and scale back its business plan until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operational expansion and growth. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $103,240 in cash. The Company used $339,199 of cash for operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The Company is seeking to raise additional capital. If the Company is not successful in raising additional capital it will be forced to significantly scale back its business operations and it growth plans. In addition, the COVID-19 virus and the related impact it is having on the U.S. economy is currently having a negative impact on the cash flows of our business. However, we were able to obtain two loans totaling $342,675 related to new legislation passed as a result of COVID-19.

Capital Expenditures

During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company had capital expenditures of $2,246,285 in leased vehicles. At June 30, 2020, most of the Company’s vehicles were finance with leases. At June 30, 2020 the Company had $8,468,168 of rental vehicles, net of accumulated depreciation in the amount of $2,105,179, totaling $6,362,989 in net rental vehicles. At December 31, 2019 the Company had $6,284,211 of rental vehicles, net of accumulated depreciation in the amount of $1,547,164, totaling $4,737,047 in net rental vehicles. The Company’s rental vehicles are depreciated over their estimated useful life of five years. The lease terms for those rental vehicles that are leased are generally for three years and the Company has the right to purchase the leased assets for $1 each at the end of the lease terms.

Statement of Cash Flows

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2020 totaled $339,199, which was an increase of $278,829 or 461.9% from the net cash used in operating activities of $60,370 for the same period in 2019. The increase is principally due to the increase in net loss.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2020 totaled $813,990, which was a change of $631,297 from the net cash provided by financing activities of $182,693 for the same period in 2019. The change is principally due to the increase in payments on financing lease obligations in 2020 and proceeds of $1.051.300 from notes payable in 2019 compared to $342,675 in 2020. In addition, we sold $275,000 of common stock in 2020 compared to $0 in 2019.

Current Plan of Operations

Our plan of operations is currently focused on the development of our operating business segments: (i) our Rideshare Platform offered through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Rideshare, and (ii) our Fleet Management business, made commercially available through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Distinct Cars. We expect to incur substantial expenditures in the foreseeable future for the potential operations of our business segments and ongoing internal research and development. At this time, we cannot reliably estimate the nature, timing or aggregate amount of such costs. Our Rideshare Platform will require extensive technical evaluation, potential regulatory review and approval, significant marketing efforts and substantial investment before it or any successors could provide us with any revenue. Further, we intend to continue to build our corporate and operational infrastructure and to build interest in our product and service offerings.

As noted above, the continuation of our current plan of operations requires us to raise significant additional capital immediately. If we are successful in raising capital, we believe that the Company will have sufficient cash resources to fund its plan of operations. The cash flow from our current vehicle leasing business and capital resources are sufficient for us to continue our current operations, but for us to fully execute our business plan we will require significant additional capital.

We continually evaluate our plan of operations discussed above to determine the manner in which we can most effectively utilize our limited cash resources. The timing of completion of any aspect of our plan of operations is highly dependent upon the availability of cash to implement that aspect of the plan and other factors beyond our control. There is no assurance that we will successfully obtain the required capital or revenues, or, if obtained, that the amounts will be sufficient to fund our ongoing operations. The inability to secure additional capital would have a material adverse effect on us, including the possibility that we would have to sell or forego a portion or all of our assets or cease operations. If we discontinue our operations, we will not have sufficient funds to pay any amounts to our stockholders.

Even if we raise additional capital in the near future, if our operating business segments fail to achieve anticipated financial results, our ability to raise additional capital in the future to fund our operating business segments would likely be seriously impaired. If in the future we are not able to demonstrate favorable financial results or projections from our operating business segments, we will not be able to raise the capital we need to continue our then current business operations and business activities, and we will likely not have sufficient liquidity or cash resources to continue operating.

Because our working capital requirements depend upon numerous factors there can be no assurance that our current cash resources will be sufficient to fund our operations. At present, we have no committed external sources of capital, and do not expect any significant product revenues for the foreseeable future. Thus, we will require immediate additional financing to fund future operations. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to obtain funds on acceptable terms, if at all.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

During fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019, the Company entered into a series of monthly vehicle leasing agreements with ACME Auto Leasing, LMP Financial Services and United Mile Fleet, each with an approximate lease term of 12 to 36 months. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had total lease obligations in the amount of $3,099,385 and $2,400,565, respectively. The Company owes monthly payments under each Lease Agreement ranging from approximately $342 per month to $621 per month. At the end of the term of the Lease Agreement, lessee has the right to purchase ownership and title of the subject vehicle for a nominal payment. In addition, the Lease Agreements are subject to and secured by a grant of a purchase money security interest on each leased vehicle.

We leased and maintained primary offices at 433 North Camden Drive, Suite 600, Beverly Hills, California 90210 and 6600 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90028, the latter being the location where the majority of our operations and staff conduct activities on a daily basis. We do not currently own any real property.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

In the ordinary course of our business, we are not exposed to market risk of the sort that may arise from changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates, or that may otherwise arise from transactions in derivatives.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. Preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. In many instances, we could have reasonably used different accounting estimates and in other instances changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Actual results could differ significantly from our estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected. We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving our judgments and estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from renting its fleet of cars to Uber and Lyft drivers. Revenue is recognized based on the rental agreements which are generally on a weekly basis. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers.

We consider a signed contract or other similar documentation reflecting the terms and conditions under which products will be provided to be persuasive evidence of an arrangement. Collectability is assessed based on a number of factors, including payment history and the creditworthiness of a customer. If it is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, revenue is not recognized until collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees.

Contingencies

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s management, in consultation with its legal counsel as appropriate, assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company, in consultation with legal counsel, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims, as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable, but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in rules and forms adopted by the SEC.

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), to assess the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2020. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure due to a material weakness.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address this material weakness, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company may become involved in lawsuits and other legal proceedings that arise in the course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and it is not possible to predict the outcome of litigation with total confidence. The Company is currently not aware of any legal proceedings or potential claims against it whose outcome would be likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results, or cash flows.

Social Reality Inc. v. YayYo, Inc.

This action was filed on February 11, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Social Reality Inc. is a media company that claims to have provided media services to the Company. Plaintiff has sued the Company for breach of contract and related causes of action, arising from its claims that the Company has failed to pay for past outstanding invoices for services rendered. The plaintiff has also filed a motion for prejudgment attachment which was heard on July 28, 2020. The Superior Court denied the writ of attachment on the merits. The parties have a case management conference scheduled for August 18, 2020. The Company believes that it has valid defenses to the lawsuit, and expects to file counterclaims that will offset or negate any monies owed to plaintiff; it will vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Anthony Davis v. YayYo, Inc., and Ramy El-Batrawi

This action was filed on March 5, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Anthony Davis was hired by the Company as its Chief Executive Officer in or about December 2016, although he worked there for only a matter of months. Mr. El-Batrawi is the founder of the Company and our current Chief Executive Officer and director, and was involved, the complaint alleges, in Plaintiff’s hiring. As part of his compensation, Mr. Davis claims that he expected to receive stock options in the Company. He has alleged that “after several months of unsuccessfully attempting to persuade the Company’s founder to implement certain protocols and procedures” Davis resigned from his executive officer and director positions, and entered into a written settlement agreement with the Company as a consultant. Mr. Davis claims that the Company breached its agreement to award him certain stock options and includes a claim for wage and hour violations. The lawsuit also includes a request for declaratory and injunctive relief. Davis also included a claim under California Unfair Practices Act. The Company denies liability and asserts that it has paid Davis all amounts due to him under the contract, and that Davis failed to exercise his stock options before they expired on December 31, 2018. It intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit, and has agreed to pursue mediation pursuant to the contract with plaintiff.

Ivan Rung v. YayYo, Inc., Ramy El-Batrawi, et al., 20STCV27876

This action was filed on July 22, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Ivan Rung claims to have purchased the Company’s stock and purports to bring a securities class action on behalf of all purchasers of YayYo’s stock pursuant to the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with YayYo’s November 14, 2019 initial public stock offering (IPO”). Mr. El-Batrawi is the founder and current CEO of the Company but at the time of the IPO was only a shareholder of the Company having stepped down as CEO, Director and a controlling shareholder of the Company. The complaint is vague about alleged misrepresentation and material omissions, detailing instead a supposed chronology of events leading to the Company’s voluntary decision to delist its stock from NASDAQ, a decision the Company announced in an 8K filed on February10, 2020. The Company denies liability and asserts that it accurately and completely disclosed all materially adverse facts and occurrences in its Registration Statement, related public filings and other public statements, and the Complaint’s alleged violations of Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 are baseless. It intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Michael Vanbecelaere v. YayYo, Inc., Ramy El-Batrawi, et al., 20STCV28066

This action was filed on July 23, 2020, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, also as a purported class action. Plaintiff Michael Vanbecelaere claims to have purchased the Company’s stock “traceable to the IPO” and like Rung, brings a securities class action pursuant to Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of all purchasers of YayYo’s stock. The complaint like the preceding action, Ivan Rung v. YayYo, Inc., Ramy El-Batrawi, et al., 20STCV27876 (“Rung”) alleges false statements and material omission pursuant to the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with YayYo’s November 14, 201 9 initial public stock offering (IPO). The defendants are identical to the defendants in the action filed the day before, on July 22, 2020. The two complaints are virtual cookie cutter versions of each other including a false allegation of fact about YayYo that appears in an identical paragraph 13: “On or about June 21, 2016, defendant EI-Batrawi incorporated YayYo in Delaware. The Company then rented cars to Uber and Lyft drivers.” (The business model of YayYo was different on June 21, 2016.) As with the Rung case, the Company denies liability and asserts that it accurately and completely disclosed all materially adverse facts, events and occurrences in its Registration Statement and related public filings, and the Complaint’s alleged violations of Sections 11 & 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 are baseless. The actions will be “low numbered” to the same Superior Court judge and consolidated. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

COVID-19 has had a negative impact on our business the first half of 2020

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus surfaced in China, which has and is continuing to spread throughout the world, including the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” and on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a “pandemic.” The governors of New York, California and several other states, as well as mayors on many cities, have ordered their residents to cease traveling to non-essential jobs and to curtail all unnecessary travel, and to stay in their homes as much as possible in the coming weeks, as the nation confronts the escalating coronavirus outbreak, and similar restrictions have been recommended by the federal authorities and authorities in many other states and cities. Since the beginning of 2020 and the spread of COVID-19, rideshare companies have increasingly been negatively impacted. According to its recent investor update call, Uber’s gross bookings in Seattle are down by 60-70%, and Uber assumes similar declines in other big cities hit by COVID-19. As Americans practice social distancing and self-isolation, Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare companies have seen a steep decline in ridership and revenue, as a result. Given that rideshare drivers are both at risk themselves and of risk to the public, and in addition to decreased demand overall, less people are even still driving. The Company has seen a decline in revenue during the first half of 2020 which is having a negative impact on the cash flows of the business, but saw a positive upward movement in revenue the latter part of the second quarter ended June 30, 2020. The Company has seen increased demand from drivers wanting to rent cars for ridesharing purposes and new drivers renting cars for both rideshare and delivery gig economy. With the recent increase in the number of positive COVID-19 cases, the Company is not able to predict the ultimate impact that COVID -19 will have on its business. If another lockdown were to occur, the Company could be forced to significantly scale back its business operations and its growth plans, and could ultimately have a significant negative impact on the Company. The Company cannot at this time estimate the long term effect of this unprecedented situation on the rideshare market or delivery gig economy in general or the Company in particular.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,553,571 shares of common stock to three investors for cash proceeds of $25,000

The offer, sale and issuance of the above securities was made to accredited investors and the Company relied upon the exemptions contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder with regard to the sale. No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The offer and sales were made to accredited investors and transfer of the common stock will be restricted by the Company in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.