eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE Corp - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-55203

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(310) 915-9700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Copies of Communications to:

Louis Taubman, Esq.

Hunter Taubman Fischer

1450 Broadway, 26^th Floor

New York, NY 10018

P: 917-512-0828

F: 212-202-6380

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Ruble 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on November 15, 2015 was 17,890,277 shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. The Company

The Company and Nature of Business

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011, to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has generated no revenues to date. Prior to the Share Exchange Agreement discussed below, other than issuing shares to its original shareholder, the Company never commenced any operational activities.

eWellness was incorporated in Nevada in May 2013. Following a share exchange detailed below we completed in April 2014, pursuant to which eWellness Corporation, a Nevada corporation became our wholly owned subsidiary, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing eWellness Corporation’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. Our historical business and operations will continue independently. eWellness is an early-stage Los Angeles based corporation that seeks to provide a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy (DMpt) Programs utilizing its proprietary WWW.PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform initially to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems, in addition to in-office sessions. Based on today’s insurance landscape, our main revenue source shall come from a combination of in-office and telemedicine visits. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical services.

Share Exchange Agreement

On April 11, 2014, Digntye, Inc. (“Dignyte”), a publicly held Nevada corporation and eWellness Corporation (“Private Co”), a privately held company incorporated in Nevada, executed a Share Exchange Agreement (or “Initial Exchange Agreement”). Prior to the execution and delivery of the final Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”), the Board of Directors of Dignyte approved the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Similarly, the Board of Directors of the Private Co. approved the exchange. On April 25, 2014, immediately prior to the execution and delivery of the Agreement, Dignyte amended its certificate of incorporation to change its corporate name from “Dignyte, Inc.” to “eWellness Healthcare Corporation.”

Pursuant to the Agreement, eWellness Healthcare Corporation issued 9,200,000 shares of unregistered common stock, $.001 par value per share (the “common stock”) to the shareholders of the Private Co. in exchange for all outstanding shares of the Private Co.’s common stock. In addition, our former chief executive officer agreed: (i) to tender 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Dignyte back to the Company for cancellation; (ii) assign from his holdings, an additional 2,500,000 shares of Dignyte to the shareholders of the Private Co. resulting in a total of 11,700,000 shares owned by those shareholders; and, (iii) to a further assignment of an additional 2,100,000 shares of Dignyte to other parties as stated therein (collectively, the “CEO Stock Actions”).

As the parties satisfied all of the closing conditions, on April 30, 2014, we closed the Share Exchange. As a result, the Private Co. shareholders own approximately 76.97% of our issued and outstanding common stock, after giving effect to CEO Stock Actions.

Following the Share Exchange, we abandoned our prior business plan and we are now pursuing the Private Co.’s historical businesses and proposed businesses. The Private Co. is the surviving company under the share exchange and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For financial reporting purposes, the Share Exchange represents a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination. Consequently, the transaction is accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization. eWellness Corporation is the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and Dignyte, Inc. is the acquired company. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations that are reflected in the historical financial statements prior to the transactions are those of eWellness Corporation and are recorded at the historical cost basis of eWellness Corporation, and the consolidated financial statements after completion of the transaction include the assets, liabilities and operations of eWellness Healthcare Corporation, and eWellness Corporation from the closing date of the transaction. Additionally all historical equity accounts and awards of eWellness Corporation, including par value per share, share and per share numbers, have been adjusted to reflect the number of shares received in the transaction.

The foregoing description of the Share Exchange Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the Share Exchange Agreement, a copy of which is attached to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2014. At the execution of the Share Exchange Agreement, the number of total shares of common stock outstanding was 15,200,000.

The Company has fully developed a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Programs (“DMpt”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic. The Company’s activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including failure to secure funding to operationalize the Company’s business plan.

On July 22, 2015, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, eWellness Corporation, was merged into the Company and, therefore, no longer exists as a separate entity.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The interim financial information of the Company as of periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 is unaudited. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 is derived from audited financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they omit or condense footnotes and certain other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting conform to the accounting policies disclosed in ASU 2014-10. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the interim periods reported have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2015. The unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Going Concern

For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company has no revenues and no operations. The Company has an accumulated loss of $3,082,114. In view of these matters, there is substantive doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Deferred Offering and Acquisition Costs

The Company defers as other assets the direct incremental costs of raising capital until such time as the offering is completed. At the time of the completion of the offering, the costs will be charged against the capital raised. Should the offering be terminated, the deferred offering costs will be charged to operations during the period in which the offering is terminated. Direct acquisition costs will be expensed as incurred.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company complies with the accounting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820-10, Fair Value Measurements, as well as certain related FASB staff positions. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact business and considers assumptions that marketplace participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy for measurements of fair value as follows:

Level 1 – quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not have Level 1, 2, or 3 financial assets or liabilities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes all cash deposits and highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity to the Company of three months or less.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of assets with useful lives longer than one year. Useful lives for assets have been determined to be 5 years for the Company.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has yet to realize revenues from operations. The Company has commenced operations, it will recognize revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is probable.

Loss per Common Share

The Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the loss per share. Basic loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation. As the Company has no common stock equivalents and has incurred losses for the period ended September 30, 2015, no dilutive shares are added into the loss per share calculations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that are adopted by the Company as of the specified date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements presentation.

Note 3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment that is stated at cost $8,420 and $4,214 less accumulated depreciation of $2,035 and $983 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Depreciation expense was $1,053 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and $421 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is five years for computer equipment.

Note 4. Intangible Assets

The Company recognizes the cost of a software license and a license for use of a programming code as intangible assets. The stated cost of these assets were $24,770 and $24,770 less accumulated amortization of $4,170 and $1,954 for the periods ended September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. For the periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the amortization expense recorded was $2,216 and $477, respectively.

Note 5. Related Party Transactions

A company for which the Company’s former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO is also serving as CFO, has paid $83,315 on the Company’s behalf for various operating expenses. The amount outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $49,761 and $56,155, respectively. The Company recorded $2,912 and $608 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based on an interest rate of 8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

During 2014, the Company entered into a license agreement with a programming company in which one of our directors is Chief Technology Officer. Through the licensing agreement, we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000. The license fee is recorded as an Intangible Asset and Accounts Payable on the Balance Sheet.

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The imputed rent expense of $500 per month is recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

The officers of the Company incur business expenses on behalf of the Company. The amounts outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $69,684 and $30,181, respectively.

Note 6. Income Taxes

The tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of the Company’s effective tax rate for the full year adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the relevant period. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated tax rate changes, the Company makes a cumulative adjustment.

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, net of expected reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities, as it believes it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized.

The Company does not identify any material uncertain tax positions of the Company on returns that have been filed or that will be filed. The Company has not had operations and has deferred items consisting entirely of

unused Net Operating Losses.. Since the Company does not believe that this Net Operating Loss will ever produce a tax benefit, even if examined by taxing authorities and disallowed entirely, there would be no effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the periods ended September 30 2015, and September 30, 2014 the Company did not recognize nor accrue for any interest or penalties.

Note 7. Non-Convertible Notes Payable

On January 27, 2015, the Company issued a promissory note of $20,000 with a shareholder/consultant at an annual interest rate of 12% due and payable on April 23, 2015. On April 9, 2015, as part of the second closing of the convertible debt discussed in Note 8 below, the note for $20,000, together with accrued interest for $3,980 through March 31, 2015 and future consulting fees due and payable through October 2015 of $100,000 were converted to a convertible note of $123,980.11. The consulting fees for future months were booked to prepaid expense and were amortized over the remaining term of the consulting agreement.

On May 27, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $768. On August 26, 2015, the Company entered into an extension of this note for another 90 days to October 23, 2015. As an inducement for this extension, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $1,348 of accrued interest for this note.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On July 15, 2015, the Company received $18,000 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $315. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $193 of accrued interest for this note.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $22,500 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a risky note fee of $5,625 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 450,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $946. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $105 of accrued interest for this note.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $12,500 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a risky note fee of $3,125 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $526. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $58 of accrued interest for this note.

 On September 16, 2015, the Company received $2,500 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a risky loan fee of $625 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 50,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $105. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $12 of accrued interest for this note.

Note 8. Convertible Notes Payable

On December 23, 2014 the Company issued $213,337 convertible promissory notes and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to four individual investors. After 2014, the overall terms of the Notes are as follows:

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On September 10, 2015, a convertible promissory note with the principal value of $108,167 was converted to 309,048 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $.35 per share. The warrants associated with this note were not exercised. See Note 9 – Equity Transactions below.

On April 9, 2015, the Company issued $270,080 convertible promissory notes (including an aggregate of $123,980 that was converted from certain other outstanding notes, including accrued interest, and future contractual cash consulting fees) and warrants to purchase shares of common stock to eight individual investors. The overall terms of the notes are as follows:

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On July 14, 2015, convertible promissory notes with a principal value of $87,500 were converted to 250,000 shares of common stock at $.35 per share. The warrants associated with these notes were not exercised. See Note 9 –Equity Transactions below.

On August 19, 2015, convertible promissory notes with a principal value of $33,600 were converted to 96,000 shares of common stock at $.35 per share. The warrants associated with these notes were not exercised. See Note 9 –Equity Transactions below.

On September 10, 2015, a convertible promissory note with a principal value of $123,980 was converted to 354,229 shares of common stock at $.35 per share. The warrants associated with this note was not exercised. See Note 9 –Equity Transactions below.

Under the guidance of ASC 470-20 Debt With Conversion and Other Options, the common shares of the Company, pending being listed on the OTC, and the net settlement requirements of the warrants will be analyzed at the end of each quarter to determine if the conversion does become readily convertible to cash which would require derivative accounting calculations and recording.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9. Equity Transactions

Preferred Stock

The total number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 10,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. There have been no preferred shares issued as of September 30, 2015.

Common Stock

The total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On January 24, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 shares for consulting services at a value of $40,000 that is being amortized over the life of the contract.

On February 23, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 60,000 shares for consulting services for a value of $6,000 that is being amortized over the life of the contract

On July 14, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 shares for conversion of convertible debt of $87,500. 

On August 19, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 96,000 shares for conversion of convertible debt of $33,600.

On September 10, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 663,277shares for conversion of convertible debt of $232,147.

As of the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company has 17,890,277 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held at all stockholders’ meetings for all purposes including the election of directors. The common stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

No holder of shares of stock of any class is entitled as a matter of right to subscribe for or purchase or receive any part of any new or additional issue of shares of stock of any class or of securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, whether now hereafter authorized or whether issued for money, for consideration other than money, or by way of dividend.

On behalf of the Company, Merriman Capital has filed a Form 211 with FINRA to facilitate trading of our stock in the over-the-counter market. Merriman is currently responding to FINRA’s comments and we cannot estimate if, and when FINRA will approve our stock for public trading.

Warrants

On January 24, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 warrants that were issued as part of a consulting agreement extension that expired on October 21, 2015. The fair value of the warrants is $32,187 and the Company recorded $17,882 as consulting expense and $14,305 as prepaid expense to be amortized over the life of the contract which expires in October 2015.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On April 9, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 771,658 warrants that were issued as part convertible debt totaling $270,080. The fair value of the warrants is $1,132.

On May 20, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 warrants that were issued as part of an advisory services agreement. The fair value of the warrants is $4,598 and the Company recorded this as consulting expense.

On May 20, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 warrants that were issued as part of an advisory services agreement. The fair value of the warrants is $1,342 and the Company recorded $112 as consulting expense and $1,230 as prepaid expense to be amortized over the life of the contract which expires May 20, 2016.

On May 30, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 warrants that were issued as part of the of a promissory note. The fair value of the warrants is $768.

On July 15, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 warrants that were issued as part of a promissory note. The fair value of the warrants is $315.

On August 26, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 warrants that were issued as part of the extension of a consulting agreement dated January 24, 2015. The fair value of the warrants is $315.

On August 26, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 warrants that were issued as part of the extension of a promissory note dated May 26, 2015. The fair value of the warrants is $315.

On September 16, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 750,000 warrants that were issued as part of three promissory notes. The fair value of the warrants is $1,577.

The following is a summary of the status of all of the Company’s warrants as of September 30, 2015 and changes during the nine months ended on that date:

For purpose of determining the fair market value of the warrants issued during the three months ended September 30, 2015, we used the Black Scholes option valuation model. These valuations were done throughout the period at the date of issuance and not necessary as of the reporting date. As there is no current market for the Company’s shares, we used $0.10 as the stock price at valuation date to be consistent with prior issuances and the stock prices of comparable companies to determine volatility. The significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the date of issuance are as follows:

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock Option Plan

On August 6, 2015, the Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which certain directors, officers, employees and consultants will be eligible for certain stock options and grants. The Plan is effective as of August 1, 2015 and the maximum number of shares reserved and available for granting awards under the Plan shall be an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of common stock, provided however that on each January 1, starting with January 1, 2016, an additional number of shares equal to the lesser of (A) 2% of the outstanding number of shares (on a fully-diluted basis) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (B) such lower number of shares as may be determined by the Board or committee charged with administering the plan. This plan may be amended at any time by the Board or appointed plan Committee.

Note 10. Commitments, Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document (which was essentially a form of rescission) was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to an alleged violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC’s concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

EWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 On or about June 23, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Bistromatics Corp., to which one of our directors is Chief Technology Officer, pursuant to which we obtained a perpetual license to use the programming code created by a video management platform as a base to develop our telemedicine video service for a license fee of $20,000 due by September 31, 2014. The parties entered into an addendum extending the due date of the license fee to December 31, 2014, another addendum extending it to July 1, 2015, another addendum extending it to October 31, 2015 and another addendum extending it to January 31, 2016.. Intellectual property developed as a result of this license, will be our property; but Bistromatics will retain the intellectual property for the original code base. We may resell or license the resulting telemedicine platform for an extended license fee of $10,000 for each additional instance the code base will be used. Through this agreement, Bistromatics Corp. built our PHZIO.com platform; our director purchased the domain name on behalf of the Company and retains no rights to same.

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The rental agreement provides for the value of the rent of $500 per month be recorded as contributed towards the founding eWellness and its operations. During the period ended September 30, 2015, we have recorded this rent payment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital on the Balance Sheet.

In May 2014, the Company signed an Office Service Agreement for office space in New York, New York. A deposit of $17,874 was paid and recorded in prepaid expense. The utilization of the office space began on August 1, 2014 and terminated at December 31, 2014. The Company negotiated a settlement of $5,500 in April, 2015 for the cancellation of the agreement. The settlement resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $11,323.

On January 24, 2015, the Company received $20,000 in consideration for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $447 of accrued interest for this note. On April 9, 2015, this note and accrued interest through March 31, 2015 was converted into convertible debt.

On January 24, 2015 the Company extended a previous consulting and service agreement with a consultant from April 21, 2015 to October 20, 2015 for which the Company shall issue 400,000 shares of restricted common stock and 400,000 callable common stock purchase warrants at a strike price of $0.35 per share. These shares were issued on April 9, 2015. Putsuant to this extension agreement, the Company was to pay $10,000 per month consulting fee beginning with February 1, 2015 through the end of the agreement. As discussed in Footnote 7 above, the full $100,000 consulting fees were rolled into a convertible note. The fees for months after the period ended September 30, 2015, are recorded in prepaid expense and are being amortized over the life of the contract extension.

On February 14, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with BMT, Inc. as a consultant and advisor in connection with certain business development advisory. This agreement is on an at-will basis as determined by the Company in exchange for cash compensation to be invoiced monthly. The total compensation paid as of September 30, 2015 on this agreement is $11,950.

On February 23, 2015, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant in connection with certain corporate finance, investor relations and related business matters in exchange for 60,000 shares of restricted common stock. These shares were issued on April 14, 2015.

On March 16, 2015, the Company extended a $20,000 licensing fee payment agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. pertaining to intellectual property utilized by the Company until July 1, 2015. The Company made an initial payment of $5,000 with the remaining fees to be to be paid on or before July 1, 2015. On August 11, 2015, the Company signed an addendum to the licensing agreement with Bistromatics to extend the payment of the licensing fee to October 31, 2015. On November 10, 2015, the Company signed an additional addendum to the licensing agreement with Bistromatics to extend the payment of the licensing fee to January 30, 2016.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”), a company owned by one of the Company’s officers, wherein it is agreed that EPT would be able to operate the Company’s telemedicine platform www.phzio.com and offer it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company is to receive 75% of the net insurance reimbursements from the patient for use of the platform. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments – computer equipment, office or facilities rental payments, physical therapist or physical therapy assistant, administrative staff, patient induction equipment, office supplies, utilities and other associated operating costs. It is anticipated that the operation of the platform by EPT will generate positive cash flow within 90 days from the start of patient induction.

On April 17, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Akash Bajaj, M.D., M.P.H. The agreement is for Dr. Bajaj to serve as a consultant and as the Chairman of the Company’s Clinical Advisory Board. The term of the agreement is for one year with annual renewal as desired. The agreement further sets the hourly rate to be paid at $225 per hour with payment to be at the end of each month. Further, the Company granted Dr. Bajaj a five-year non-statutory option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $.35 per share. The options will vest over a 12 month period at 8,333 per month. The value of the options are deemed to be zero since the Board of Directors have not yet approved the issuance of the options.

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Mavericks Capital Securities LLC (“Mavericks”). The term of the contract begins on the effective date and can be terminated within 30 days upon written notice by either party. The Company is to pay Mavericks a monthly retainer fee of $10,000 that is deferred until the Company raises $250,000 in new investor funds from the effective date. In addition, the Company granted Mavericks 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share. On September 28, 2015, the Company and Mavericks entered into an amendment to the consultant agreement pursuat to which Mavericks will also assist the Company in the acquisition of new customers, for which the Company shall pay Mavericks 10% of the revenue received by the Company, net of any pass through costs, from any such customers introduced to the Company by Mavericks; payment shall be made upon the Company’s receipt of such revenues. In the amendment, the parties also further clarified the definition of Customer Acquisition.

On May 20, 2015, the Company entered into a one year agreement with financial advisory company. As the retainer, the Company granted the consultant 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share.

On May 27, 2015, the Company received $25,000 in consideration for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.35 per share. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $118 of accrued interest for this note.

On July 15, 2015, the Company received $18,000 in consideration for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 5% per annum. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $315. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $193 of accrued interest for this note.

On August 6, 2015, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Rochelle Pleskow as the seventh member of the Board of Directors, effective immediately. Ms. Pleskow is the current head of Healthcare Informatics at HP, and the Board is confident that Ms. Pleskow can add value to the Company’s PHZIO platform through helping to create better patient outcome data. The Company agreed to pay Ms. Pleskow $2,000 per month fees, which shall accrue as of July 1, 2015 and be paid upon the first closing of our next financing, plus 250,000 5-year stock options at a price of $0.80 per share. She shall also be eligible to receive any other benefits that are offered to other directors.

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $22,500 in consideration for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a risky note fee of $5,625 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 450,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $946. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $105 of accrued interest for this note.

On September 16, 2015, the Company received $12,500 in exchange for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a Risky Note Fee of $3,125 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 250,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $526. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $58 of accrued interest for this note.

 On September 16, 2015, the Company received $2,500 in consideration for a 90-day Promissory Note at an interest rate of 12% per annum plus a risky loan fee of $625 which is being amortized over the term of the loan. As an inducement for this promissory note, the Company issued 50,000 warrants to purchase Company common stock at $.80 per share. The fair value of the warrants is $105. For the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded $12 of accrued interest for this note.

 From time to time the Company may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Except as may be outlined above, management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 11. Segment Reporting

The Company has one operating segment, which was identified based upon the availability of discrete financial information and the chief operating decision makers’ regular review of financial information.

Note 12. Subsequent Events

On October 5, 2015, the Company extended the term of an $18,000 promissory note issued on July 15, 2015 that was originally due on October 13, 2015 to December 14, 2015; however, as consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to repay the note, plus interest and the Loan Fee (as hereinafter defined), upon receipt of $100,000 or more in other financing. Interest on the note accrues at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless paid sooner as previously explained, the Company shall pay $4,500 (the “Loan Fee”) on the maturity date of the note. As additional inducement for the extension, the Company also agreed to issue the lender five-year warrants to purchase up to 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.80 per share.

On October 11, 2015, the Company issued an $10,000 promissory note which matures on December 14, 2015; however, if the Company receives $100,000 or more in its current private placement of up to $2,500,000 convertible note with warrants, the note will be due within three business days of such fund settling in the Company’s account, plus interest at a rate of 12% annum and a risk loan fee of $2,500.

On October 11, 2015, the Company extended the term of an $25,000 promissory note issued on July 15, 2015 that was due on October 23, 2015 to December 14, 2015; however, as a consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to repay the note, plus interest and a risk loan fee of $6,250. As additional inducement for the extension, the Company also agreed to issue the lender five-year warrants to purchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock at $0.80 per share.

On Novemer 10, 2015, the Company signed an addendum to the licensing agreement with Bistromatics to extend the payment of the licensing fee to January 30, 2016.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 2 of Part I of this report include forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements are based on our management’s current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “proposed,” “intended,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You should read statements that contain these words carefully, because they discuss our expectations about our future operating results or our future financial condition or state other “forward-looking” information. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: variability of our future revenues and financial performance; risks associated with product development and technological changes; the acceptance of our products in the marketplace by potential future customers; general economic conditions. You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in this Quarterly Report could substantially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition, and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our securities could decline. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, growth rates, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report to conform these statements to actual results.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations relates to the operations and financial condition reported in the financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and related notes included in this report and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

THE COMPANY

Business Overview

eWellness is in the initial phase of developing a unique telemedicine platform that offers Distance Monitored Physical Therapy Program (“DMpt program”) to pre-diabetic, cardiac and health challenged patients, through contracted physician practices and healthcare systems specifically designed to help prevent patients that are pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic.

Initially, our focus was on patients with pre-diabetes conditions. However, we have broadened our focus to include overweight patients saddled with lower back pain and knee pain caused by tissue strain and inactivity. We also decided to launch our platform in Los Angeles instead of New York after Blue Shield of California reimbursed our physical therapy telemedicine. We were poised to launch our business in New York through a partnership with Millennium Healthcare, Inc. (“MHI”), but the partnership did not provide the results we were expecting. Additionally, management determined that relocating the Company’s operations closer to where the CEO and Chairman lived made the business more manageable and avoided time and monies lost due to travel. Management believes that by broadening the Company’s focus to include lower back pain and knee pain caused from excess weight, provides additional opportunities for success. The Company remains committed to servicing patients diagnosed as pre-diabetes as well.

As shown in the financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report, the Company has had no revenues to date and has incurred only losses since its inception. The Company has had no operations and has been issued a “going concern” opinion from our accountants, based upon the Company’s reliance upon the sale of our common stock as the sole source of funds for our future operations.

The Company’s operations and corporate offices are located at 11825 Major Street Culver City, CA, 90230, with a telephone number of (310) 915-9700.

The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

Plan of Operations

During November and December 2014, we conducted a pilot study of our PHZIO.COM platform (the “PHZIO Study”), which included two men and six women aged between 33 and 56 years old over an eight week period; six were based in Los Angeles and two were based in Louisiana. Three of the participants were recruited from Craigslist and the rest were friends or family of the Company’s management team. The goals for each were to gain physical strength, stamina, balance and to lose weight. The study required each participant to attend exercise/therapy sessions three days per week from 6:30 am – 8:30 am during the trial period. Each patient attended every scheduled session and a few lost 15 pounds by the end of the study period; most said they improved their abdominal muscle strength and flexibility. Management believes these results will only improve with a longer therapy regimen period. Management is hopeful that a larger study with more patients over a six month period may produce meaningful data that would increase the likelihood for reimbursement for Medicaid plans.

The participants of our PHZIO Study indicated that they would prefer to interact with a physical therapy exercise program provided via telemedicine rather than travel to a facility; the majority agreed (88%) that they would not have travelled to our Culver City facilities to participate in a brick and mortar program and/or their attendance record would have declined. Additionally, all participants stated that they want to continue using the PHZIO.COM platform. They also indicated that having a physical therapist provide exercise instructions via the web was not a barrier to interacting with our PHZIO.COM program.

Our initial PHZIO.COM program is focused on patients that have back, hip and or knee pain and are overweight and may be pre-diabetic. Based upon the successful development of our initial PHZIO.COM platform, and with proper funding, we intend on expanding our on-line exercise system to include various other exercise programs including dietary guidance programs, hip replacement, orthopedic exercise programs and osteoporosis exercise programs.

We have developed various key performance indicators that we anticipate using to assess our business.

Patient Induction Rate. Our DMpt programs are 26 weeks long and start with the induction. Our patient induction rate will provide us a weekly direct understanding of how we are coordinating with the referring doctors and how efficiently we are managing the inductions; it will also give us a foundation for modeling the next six months of revenue.

Patient Attrition Rate. This indicator may be the single most important indicator of long term business outlook. The long term health of our business is directly linked to the long term health of our patients. If the patient stays with the program and does well, the probability of a health changing lifestyle shift is dramatically increased. When the patient stays with the program the Company’s business is rewarded with additional revenue. Furthermore, the increased success of each patient in our program enhances the insurance provider’s cost/benefits actuarial view of our service and thus motivates a better reimbursement schedule and more patients for us in the long run.

New Offices Per Month. This indicator will be useful in determining how fast or slow our distribution system will be growing. It will also provide us a predictive measure for resource requirements that will be emerging over the next six months.

Selling General and Administrative Expenses (SGA). Before even launching, we have received a high indication of interest in our service. We think the demand is warranted, but recognize that in the early stages of our services, we may experience bottlenecks in our ability to meet the demand for same. Under this type of environment it is critical to maintain awareness of the Company’s operational budget goals and how they are being met in our attempts to address demand. Regardless of our growth pace, it is critical to shareholder value that we are mindful of our operational spending.

Cashflow. Because the Company is “early stage” and launching with a minimum of capital, monitoring cashflow on a constant basis will be essential to growth.

During the third quarter of 2015, we pivoted our business model to focus on licensing our PHZIO.COM platform to any physical therapy clinics in the U.S. and or to have large scale employers use our platform as a corporate wellness program. The Physical Therapy industry has remained disconnected and unscalable throughout the technological revolution of the past twenty years. Over 200,000 Physical Therapists are limited to one-on-one patient treatments within a traditional clinic setting. The Physical Therapy industry measures $33 Billion in size with over 270 Million one-on-one treatments delivered annually. This technology gap and market size is the opportunity that the Company is focused on with the recent launch of its PHZIO.COM telemedicine platform. (1)

Our PHZIO.COM platform enables patients to engage with live or on-demand video based physical therapy telemedicine treatments from their home or office. Following a physicians exam and prescription for physical therapy to treat back, knee or hip pain, a patient can be examined by a physical therapist and if found appropriate inducted in eWellness’ PHZIO.COM program that includes a progressive 6-month telemedicine exercise program (including weekly in-clinic exercise sessions and monthly in-clinic check ups. All PHZIO.COM treatments are monitored by a licensed therapist that sees everything the patient is doing while providing their professional guidance and feedback in real-time. This ensures treatment compliance by the patient, maintains the safety and integrity of the prescribed exercises, tracks patient metrics and captures pre and post treatment evaluation data. PHZIO.COM unlocks a host of potential for revolutionizing patient treatment models and directly links back to the established brick and mortar Physical Therapy clinic. This unique model enables any physical therapy practice to be able to execute more patient care while utilizing their same resources, and creates more value than was ever before possible.

The following video link will provide brief overview about the merits of our PHZIO.COM program. https://ewellnesshealth.com/

Through our Cooperative Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”) their initial Marina del Rey, California (MDR) patient induction office (“PIO”) located adjacent to the Cedars-Sinai owned Marina Del Rey Hospital (“MDRH”). MDRH is a 145-bed acute care, Joint Commission accredited hospital offering general acute medical services and 24/7 emergency care. The MDR POI is effectively a laboratory for us to support the licensing of our platform to the entire Physical Therapy (“PT”) industry. Active PT licensing of our PHYSIO.COM platform is anticipated to begin in early 2016. We have also developed a separate vertical for our PHZIO.COM platform that focuses on the marketing of our platform as a robust Corporate Wellness program. Active marketing to the large scale employers in the Los Angeles area began in the October 2015 with the expectation of beginning at least pilot program for our Corporate Wellness program during the first quarter of 2016. Our MDR induction office is expected to have 75-100 paying patients by year end.

The following are the current PHZIO.COM Program MDR Office Metrics for the 3rd QTR of 2015. EPT has been slow to increase its new patient on-boarding, although the new patient count has begun to escalate in November due new MDR bariatric surgery referrals program. The total patients utilizing the PHZIO.COM System to during the 3rd QTR was 38 Patients. The total paying patients (where Insurance Reimbursement is being received) was 13 Patients. EPT is currently receiving reimbursement for our PHZIO.COM program from Anthem Blue Cross, Aetna and Blue Shield health insurance providers. During the 3rd quarter of 2015 three EPT patents dropped out of our PHZIO.COM program after an average of 8 sessions due to moving (i) out of the state, (ii) extensive travel schedule and (iii) loss of interest. Our PHZIO.COM program is delivering approximately 83% patient compliance rate for inducted patients (based upon patients participating in 2-3 PHZIO.COM sessions per week). The average reimbursement per PHZIO.COM session in the 3rd quarter of 2015 (We anticipate additional trailing reimbursement payments for services provided in the 3rd quarter) was $40.26. The total reimbursements received by EPT for the PHZIO.COM program during the 3rd quarter was $5,636.60. The total (Paid) monitored PHZIO.COM visits in the 3rd quarter was a 140 sessions. The total referred patients excluded from the PHZIO.COM program in the 3rd quarter (due to being fall risks, technology issues and medicare patients) was 15 patients. The EPT MDR induction office is anticipated to have up to 75-100 paying patients by year end. The Company anticipates generating initial revenues from its PHZIO.COM platform and its licensing agreement with EPT during the 4th quarter of 2015.

New Patient On-Boarding Initiatives for the EPT MDR Office include: October 15th 2015, new patient referrals began from a bariatric surgery practice in MDR (1-4 new patients per week), new physician referral outreach at MDRH continues weekly and EPT is now targeting other Los Angeles based bariatric surgery practices.

We are also actively seeking corporate partnership relationships with other telemedicine companies that if completed, would create a new channel for our corporate wellness PHZIO.COM program. Amid ongoing challenges and changes within the healthcare industry, telemedicine is emerging as an increasingly attractive tool for delivering quality medical & wellness services. The following White Paper focused on the effectiveness of our PHZIO.COM distanced monitored physical therapy (“PT”) telemedicine exercise program as a reliable Corporate Wellness Solution and a general overview of the Corporate Wellness landscape.

Beginning in January 2016, we anticipate offering our PHZIO.COM program that has been designed to be the most productive physical exercise program available to corporate wellness programs and their employees. We anticipate that employers using our system can significantly improve employee wellness and decrease costs associated with workman’s compensation claims. PHZIO.COM is a comprehensive lifestyle management intervention. Our PHZIO.COM exercise program documents an employee’s success or failure. We can provision highly reliable Return On Investment (“ROI”) metrics displayed on an easy to use HIPAA compliant dashboard for any organization using our PHZIO.COM system.

The Current State of Workplace Wellness Programs: Broadly, a workplace wellness program is an employment-based activity or employer-sponsored benefit aimed at promoting health-related behaviors (primary prevention or health promotion) and disease management (secondary prevention). It may include a combination of data collection on employee health risks and population-based strategies paired with individually focused interventions to reduce those risks. A formal and universally accepted definition of a workplace wellness program has yet to emerge, and employers define and manage their programs differently. Programs may be part of a group health plan or be offered outside of that context; they may range from narrow offerings, such as free gym memberships, to comprehensive counseling and lifestyle management interventions. (2)

Wellness programs have become very common, as 92 percent of employers with 200 or more employees reported offering them in 2009. Survey data indicate that the most frequently targeted behaviors are exercise, addressed by 63 percent of employers with programs; smoking (60 percent); and weight loss (53 percent). In spite of widespread availability, the actual participation of employees in such programs remains limited. While no nationally representative data exist, a 2010 non-representative survey suggests that typically fewer than 20 percent of eligible employees participate in wellness interventions. (2)

Wellness Program Impact: In industry surveys, employers typically express their conviction that workplace wellness programs are delivering on their promise to improve health and reduce costs. Numerous anecdotal accounts of positive program effects are consistent with this optimistic view. Further, several evaluations of individual programs and summative reviews in the scientific literature provide corroborating evidence for a positive impact. (2)

In “A Review of the U.S. Workplace Wellness Market “, the most recent scientific literature evaluating the impact of workplace wellness programs on health-related behavior and medical cost outcomes identified 33 peer-reviewed publications that met their standards for methodological rigor. They found, consistent with previous reviews, evidence for positive effects on diet, exercise, smoking, alcohol use, physiologic markers, and health care costs, but limited evidence for effects on absenteeism and mental health. They could not conclusively determine whether or not program intensity was positively correlated with impact. Positive results found in this and other studies should be interpreted with caution, as many of these programs were not evaluated with a rigorous approach, and published results may not be representative of the typical experience of a U.S. employer. (2)

1. Sources: Harris Williams & Co., Physical Therapy Market Overview, Feb 2014 IBISWorld, Physical Therapists in the US (Report 62134), May 2015

2. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/workplacewellnessmarketreview2012.pdf

Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $363,5436 compared to $344,083 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 totaled $1,072,480 compared to $1,000,122 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Operating expenses increased primarily as a result of an increase in professional fees for consulting services.

Interest Expense.

Interest expense, including interest expense–related parties, was $36,826 and $8,598 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Interest expense, including expense-related parties was $90,174 and $9,390 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. The increase was related to costs of convertible debt with unrelated parties.

Net Loss

Net loss during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $429,876 compared to $352,681 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Net loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, totaled $1,180,835 compared to $1,009,505 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in the net loss is a result of increased operating and interest expenses as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company had $26,847 and $900 cash as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Net cash used in operating activities was $320,426 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $185,526 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, was $350,580 compared to $188,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

We had not yet earned any revenues as of the period ending September 30, 2015. Our current cash position is not sufficient to fund our cash requirements during the next twelve months including operations and capital expenditures. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

We had assets at September 30, 2015 of $85,247. We will be reliant upon shareholder loans, private placements or public offerings of equity to fund any kind of operations, although there can be no guarantee we will be able to secure such finding on beneficial terms, if at all. We have secured no sources of loans.

Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

As disclosed in the prior amendments to the Initial Form 8-K, we have filed the prior amendments in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company’s potential violation of Rule 419. Although the Company has continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, based upon latest communications with the persons reviewing the Form 8-K, they do not agree with the assessments the Company presented to them. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, for disclosures regarding the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates, as well as any updates further disclosed in our interim financial statements as described in this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information under Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules, regulations and forms, and (ii) that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

Information on any and all equity securities we have sold during the period covered by this Report that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended is set forth below:

On July 15, 2015, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for conversion of $87,500 of convertible debt. These shares were issued at $.35 per share.

On August 19, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 96,000 shares for conversion of $33,600 of convertible debt. These shares were issued at $.35 per share.

On September 10, 2015, the Company authorized the issuance of 663,277 shares for conversion of $232,147 of convertible debt. These shares were issued at $.35 per share.

All of the transactions listed above were made pursuant to the exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act for sales not involving a public offering or Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC. The securities issued have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

ITEM 2. EXHIBITS.

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.