eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE Corp - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 000-55203

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(310) 915-9700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Ruble 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 per share par value, outstanding on May 12, 2017 was 103,695,331 shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

eWELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements

e WELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements

e WELLNESS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

Note 1. The Company

The Company and Nature of Business

eWellness Healthcare Corporation (f/k/a Dignyte, Inc.), (the “eWellness”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 7, 2011. The Company has generated no revenues to date.

eWellness is the first physical therapy telehealth company to offer insurance reimbursable real-time distance monitored treatments. Our business model is to license our PHZIO (“PHZIO”) platform to any physical therapy (“PT”) clinic in the U.S. and or have large-scale employers use our PHZIO platform as a fully PT monitored corporate wellness program. The Company’s PHZIO home physical therapy exercise platform has been designed to disrupt the $30 billion physical therapy and the $8 billion corporate wellness industries. PHZIO re-defines the way physical therapy can be delivered. PHZIO is the first real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy platform for home use. Due to the real-time patient monitoring feature, the PHZIO platform is insurance reimbursable by payers such as: Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield.

The PHZIO Solution: A New Physical Therapy Delivery System:

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they omit or condense notes and certain other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting conform with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 2 to the Notes to Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the interim periods reported have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from these good faith estimates and judgments.

Going Concern

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company had no revenues. The Company has an accumulated loss of $11,755,036. In view of these matters, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue operations is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations, of which there can be no guarantee. The Company intends to finance its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As of March 31, 2017, the Company had the following assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had the following assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

Earnings per Common Share

The Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation. As the Company has net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017, dilutive shares are added into the per share calculation as noted below.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the diluted EPS calculation included common stock equivalents of 3,783,745 for warrants, 249 for convertible notes and 25,280,899 for stock owing to Bistromatics. For the three months ending March 31, 2016, common stock equivalents of 2,858,000 options, 4,733,618 warrants and 390,550 convertible notes were not included due to the anti-dilutive effect.

Note 3. Related Party Transactions

Through the three months ended March 31, 2017, a related party, a company for which the Company’s former Secretary-Treasurer and CFO is also serving as CFO, has paid $99,351 on the Company’s behalf for various operating expenses. The amount outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $0 and $10,481, respectively. The Company recorded $0 and $897 imputed interest on the amount owed to the related party based on an interest rate of 8% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively. Because the amount due to the related party is now being paid, the Company is no longer accruing imputed interest.

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an operating agreement with a physical therapy company (“EPT”) which is owned by the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Through the agreement, the Company agrees to provide operating capital advances for EPT to offer the Company’s PHIZIO platform to physical therapy patients. For accounting and tax purposes, the net profits or losses generated by EPT shall be allocated on a monthly basis. The Company will receive 75% of the net patient insurance reimbursements associated with the operation of the PHIZIO platform.

On November 11, 2016, the Company signed an agreement with a programming company (“PC”) within which one of the Company’s directors and Chief Technical Officer is the Chief Marketing Officer. The agreement is for additional features to be programmed for the launch of the PHIZIO platform. The contract specifies that the Company’s CEO and CTO will retain their officer and director positions and retain their past due accrued compensation through June 30, 2016. The Company is to pay a monthly base fee of $100,000 for the development and compensation for the Company’s CEO and CTO. Following payment of the initial $100,000, the Company is obligated to only pay $50,000 monthly until the PC has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 physical therapy clinics to use the PHIZIO platform. The agreement establishes that the Company is indebted to the PC for $225,000 for past programming services. For this amount, the PC was issued 25,280,899 common shares at a cost value of $0.0089. These shares were issued in April 2017. The PC will also have the right to appoint 40% of the directors. At the end of March 31, 2017, the Company had a payable of $285,000 due to this company.

The Company rents its Culver City, CA office space from a company owned by our CEO. The imputed rent expense of $500 per month is recorded in the Statement of Operations and Additional Paid in Capital in the Balance Sheet.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

Throughout the period ended March 31, 2017, the officers and directors of the Company incurred business expenses on behalf of the Company. The amounts payable to the officers as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $8,142 and $44,429, respectively. There were no expenses due to the board members but the Company has accrued directors’ fees of $170,000 and $60,000 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Because the Company is not yet profitable the officers have agreed to defer compensation. The Company had accrued executive compensation of $964,000 and $940,000 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively.

Note 4. Non-Convertible Notes Payable

In February 2017, the Company was served by a complaint filed by the holder of a note payable. The lawsuit alleges that the Company is indebted to the note holder a promissory note stemming from four loans to the Company during the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Further, the note holder claims that, because of alleged defaults and extensions of the notes, the Company is now indebted in the amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far more than the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Company and its counsel have determined that: (i) the note holder is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; and (ii) the interest rate the note holder is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Company and counsel believe the lawsuit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, the Company believes that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to the United States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

At the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company had indebtedness to this holder of the note payable $180,051 plus $21,232 of accrued interest. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued interest expense totaling $11,987 and $2,407, respectively.

Note 5. Convertible Notes Payable

On January 11, January 23 and February 14, 2017, the Company authorized three convertible notes each $55,000 for a total of $165,000. These notes mature six months from the grant date. The convertible notes convert into common stock of the Company at conversion price into which any principal amount and interest (including any default interest) under the notes shall be convertible into shares of common stock shall be equal to the lesser of: (i) $0.20 or (ii) 75% of the average of the VWAPs for the five (5) Trading Days immediately following the 180th calendar day after the Original Issue Date, whichever is lower. There is only one pricing lookback event. The notes have a 10% original issue discount and an interest rate of 8%. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company accrued interest expense totaling $2,334. In April 2017, the Company authorized amendments to these three notes in which the maturity dates of the notes were extended to February 6, 2018, February 22, 2018, and March 31, 2018, respectively.

On February 9, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a third party which required the Company to issue two 5.5% convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $165,000, each at $82,500. Each of the notes contain a 10% Original Issue Discount and an interest rate of 8%. The due date of the notes is August 9, 2017. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, only one of the notes has been funded. The Company also entered into a convertible redeemable back end note for $82,500 due on February 28, 2018 which has not yet been funded. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company accrued interest expense of $917.

On February 15, 2017, the Company and an institutional investor entered into an agreement in which: (a) the investor agreed to fund up to $5,000,000 in reliance upon an exception provided under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities act of 1933, as amended; (b) the Company will file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC within 15 days after the Company filed its annual 10K report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (The S-1 was filed on April 11, 2017); (c) the Company issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000, bearing interest at 8% (This note has not yet been funded); and (d) the Company issued a second convertible note in the principal amount of $275,000 bearing interest at 8% of which $105,000 was initially funded. With the $275,000 convertible note, the Company also issued 68,750 cashless warrants exercisable at $.25 per share. During the three months ended, the Company accrued interest expense of $1,143.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

Note 6. Equity Transactions

Preferred Stock

The total number of shares of preferred stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 20,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. There have been no preferred shares issued as of March 31, 2017.

Common Stock

The total number of shares of common stock which the Company shall have authority to issue is 400,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Company issued a total of 13,810,000 shares of common stock per debt conversion of the convertible note dated November 14, 2016. The total of the debt conversion was $47,000.

In January 2017, 1,363,277 warrants were exercised under a cashless exercise and issued 1,336,075 shares of common stock.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued 1,131,250 shares of common stock for marketing and consulting services valued at $76,750 or $0.07 per share

In January and March 2017, the Company issued 2,400,000 shares of common stock per the extinguishment of debt agreements dated December 1, 2016.

In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a six-month period to provide services which will include: (i) introductions to brokers; (ii) assist with research coverage; (iii) introductions to over 100 funds, investment banking firms and market makers; and (iv) a presentation speaking slot with a Gold sponsorship at the 2017 Wall Street Conference. In consideration for the services, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock for a value of $6,000.

Stock Options

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

The following is a summary of the status of all Company’s stock options as of March 31, 2017 and changes during the three months ended on that date:

The Company recognized stock option expense of $108,594 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Warrants

In February 2017, the Company authorized the issuance of 68,750 warrants that were issued as part of a convertible note. The fair value of the warrants is $3,235.

The following is a summary of the status of all of the Company’s warrants as of March 31, 2017 and changes during the three months ended on that date:

For purpose of determining the fair market value of the warrants and options issued during the three months ended March 31, 2017, we used the Black Scholes option valuation model. These valuations were done throughout the period at the date of issuance and not necessarily as of the reporting date. The assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the date of issuance are as follows:

Note 7. Commitments, Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all of the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document (which was essentially a form of rescission) was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

As disclosed therein, we filed the amendments to the initial Form 8-K in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to an alleged violation of Rule 419. The Company continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, but was unable to satisfy the SEC’s concerns. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

As a result of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. As a result of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining at this time the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. In light of the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

On January 24, 2017, the Registrant entered into a Definitive Service Agreement (“DSA”) with Bistromatics, a company for which the Company’s officer serves as an officer, affirming that, at the time, the Company does not currently have enough authorized shares of common stock, based upon the number of issued and outstanding shares together with shares reserved for issuance, to issue Bistromatics 25,280,899 shares of common stock. In connection with the Company’s obligations under the DSA, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada for the purposes of: (A) increasing its authorized capital stock from 110,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, to 420,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (iii) 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (iv) 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001. The Certificate of Amendment has been filed with the State of Nevada and the Company has filed an Information Statement on Schedule 14C, based upon the Joint Written Consent of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Majority Consenting Stockholders and implementing a reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, including shares of common stock reserved for issuance, in a ratio to be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, not to exceed a one-for-twenty (1:20) basis (the “Reverse Split”). After the Information Statement clears comments with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company must submit an application to and receive approval from FINRA for these corporate actions. On April 1, 2017, the Company issued 25,280,899 shares of common stock.

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

From time to time the Company may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Except as may be outlined above, the Company believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 8. Derivative Valuation

The Company evaluated the convertible debentures and associated warrants in acccordance with ASC Topic815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” and determined that the conversion feature of the convertible promissory notes were not afforded the exemption for conventional convertible instruments due to their variable conversion rates. The notes have no explicit limit on the number of shares issuable so they did not meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. In addition, the warrants have a Most Favored Nations clause resulting in the exercise price of the warrants also not being fixed. Therefore, these have been characterized as derivative instruments. We elected to recognize the notes under ASU paragraph 815-15-25-4, whereby there would be a separation into a host contract and derivative instrument. We elected to initially and subsequently measure the notes and warrants in their entirety at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.

The debt discount is amortized over the life of the note and recognized as interest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company amortized the debt discount of $82,443 and $37,470, respectively, to interest expense. The derivative liability is adjusted periodically according to stock price fluctuations and other inputs and was $1,806,428 and $8,473,265 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

During the period ended March 31, 2017, the Company had the following activity in the derivative liability account.

For purposes of determining the fair market value of the derivative liability, the Company used Black Scholes option valuation model. The significant assumptions used in the Black Scholes valuation of the derivative are as follows:

eWellness Healthcare Corporation

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2017

(unaudited)

Note 9. Subsequent Events

On April 1, 2017, the Company issued 25,280,899 shares of common stock per the contract with a related party per the Definitive Services Agreement signed on January 24, 2017. This agreement is discussed in Note 3 above.

On April 1, 2017, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock per a consultant contract signed in December 2016 in which the contract required issuance of 450,000 shares at the signing of the contract and 150,000 shares each month beginning in March 2017. The March shares were issued during the period ended March 31, 2017 and these shares represent the April shares.

On April 11, 2017, the Company executed an 8% Fixed Convertible Promissory Note payable to an institutional investor in the principal amount of $308,000. The note, which is due on November 6, 2018 was funded in the sum of $280,000 with $28,000 being retained by the investor through an original issue discount for due diligence and legal expense related to this transaction. The note is convertible into shares of common stock, par value $0.001, at a conversion price of $0.20 per Share. On April 11, 2017, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to provide for the resale of up to 9,519,229 shares of common issuable to the investor, as a selling stockholder, pursuant to a “put right” under an investment agreement dated February 10, 2017, that permits the Company to “put” up to five million dollars ($5,000,000) in shares of common stock to the investor over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months or until $5,000,000 of such shares have been “put.”

On April 14, 2017, the Company issued 77,000 shares of common stock per a consultant agreement signed in February 2017 in which the agreement stated that shares were to be issued upon the Company obtaining funding from investors introduced by the consultant.

On April 24, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a third party which required the Company to issue two 5.5% convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $167,000, each at $83,500. Each of the notes contain an Original Issue Discount of $8,500 and an interest rate of 5.5%. The due date of the notes is October 24, 2017.

During the month of April and to the date of the filing of this report, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of common stock as part of a debt conversion for a note dated November 14, 2016.

In the Registrant’s Definitive Information Statement filed with the SEC on March 1, 2017, we disclosed that our Board of Directors based upon the Joint Written Consent of our Majority Consenting Stockholders had authorized a reverse split of our outstanding shares of common stock on a ratio not to exceed one for twenty (1:20) within 180 days from March 1, 2017.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 2 of Part I of this report include forward-looking statements. These forward looking statements are based on our management’s current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “proposed,” “intended,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You should read statements that contain these words carefully, because they discuss our expectations about our future operating results or our future financial condition or state other “forward-looking” information. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: variability of our future revenues and financial performance; risks associated with product development and technological changes; the acceptance of our products in the marketplace by potential future customers; general economic conditions. You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in this Quarterly Report could substantially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition, and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our securities could decline. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, growth rates, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report to conform these statements to actual results.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations relates to the operations and financial condition reported in the financial statements of eWellness Healthcare Corporation for the three-months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and related notes included in this report and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

THE COMPANY

Overview

eWellness is the first physical therapy telehealth company to offer insurance reimbursable real-time distance monitored treatments. Our business model is to license our PHZIO (“PHZIO”) platform to any physical therapy (“PT”) clinic in the U.S. and or have large-scale employers use our PHZIO platform as a fully PT monitored corporate wellness program. The Company’s PHZIO home physical therapy exercise platform has been designed to disrupt the $30 billion physical therapy and the $8 billion corporate wellness industries. PHZIO re-defines the way physical therapy can be delivered. PHZIO is the first real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy platform for home use. Due to the real-time patient monitoring feature, the PHZIO platform is insurance reimbursable by payers such as: Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shiels

The PHIZIO Solution: A New Physical Therapy Delivery System

Marketing & Sales Strategy Pivot

We are planning to pivot away from our marketing to large scale PT clinics for now. Since we launched our Phzio platform to the Physical Therapy (“PT”) industry last fall to significant industry appeal, clinical adoption for our digital platform has been limited. We now believe that this slower than anticipated adoption is primarily due to the current lack of universal reimbursement for our digital treatment platform by many insurers, including Medicare. We anticipate that new federal legislation may change this situation by early 2018, eliminating this barrier. In light of this situation we have just launched our PreHabPT.com platform that is a low-cost form of PT that is paid for by hospitals/clinics that are providing joint replacement and repairs under a bundled payment method or is being paid for by patients directly. We believe that this pivot is key to gaining traction with patient utilization of our digital therapy for both pre-and post-surgery injuries. Thus, our marketing & sales efforts are primarily focused on the Los Angeles market, for the near term in order to maximize our digital platforms exposure. We will be marketing directly to patients, doctors, insurance providers and hospital administrators.

Transformation of PT Patient Care Model

Utilizing Phzio.com, PreHab.com and PurePT.com (to be launched later this month), a patient can receive PT digitally or in their home or office for in-person consultations, without ever going to a PT clinic. Our disruptive technology solution eliminates the real estate and clinic location requirements where PT’s have historically practiced and it frees the patient from having to commute to a PT clinic, which is the biggest reason for missed appointments. Our digital treatment system also allows a PT to treat a much larger patient volumes with higher earnings on a daily basis.

We are Leading the Workplace Revolution in the PT Industry

The way we work is changing. Freelancing is on the rise, companies are expanding and technology is helping employees stay productive wherever they are. And there’s been an increase in flexible working hours and telecommuting like we’ve never seen before.

Digital Advertising Campaign

The Company will be rolling out geographically targeted, digital and social media advertising campaign initially within select Los Angeles metro areas. This approach will have a strong focus on mobile users seeking relevant physical therapy services. Further, the Company will seek to leverage existing in-house developed technologies, that allow patients to record video journals post their traditional or digital treatment sessions. This technology will be used to solicit patient testimonials post any service being provided and then post these testimonial to the patient’s own Facebook or Instagram account. We anticipate that this approach should create a multiplier effect for the Company’s outreach efforts. The Company is also expecting to experiment with this model using various patient incentives.

Our new platforms, App’s and initiatives include:

PurePT.com: a digital patient & independent PT platform for connecting new patients to PT’s that are seeking to be treated with our PHZIO treatment system. Patient program inductions can be made in the privacy of a patient’s home or office and can also be done in a PT clinic. The goal is to make it easy for a patient to be treated, particularly in states that have direct access rules where patient’s insurance will reimburse for approximately 12 visits before a physician’s prescription is required. PurePT puts the patient first, which we believe will allow our business model to scale and build an Uber-style growth curve.

Prehab.pt.com: an 8-week physician to patient pre-surgical (Prehab) digital therapeutic exercise treatment system for patients that anticipate having total join replacement (knee, hip and or shoulder) or back surgeries. Patients may complete these digital therapeutic exercises either monitored or unmonitored. Prehab.pt.com’s backbone is built off of our PHZIO platform.

DigitalMD.com: a feature rich telehealth platform for physician practices to digitally communicate with their patients pre and post-surgery. DigitalMD.com is anticipated to be very competitively priced when compared to other similar telehealth platforms such as: Chiron Health, SnapMD, AdvancedMD, VirtualMedix, ReachHealth, Carena, HealthLynked and eVisit.

Telehealth Educational Certification Program: Online Physical Therapy Telehealth Training and Certification Workshop. We plan to launch a comprehensive curriculum for PT’s, Occupational Therapists (OT’s), PTA’s, PT students and athletic trainers to gain a complete understanding of providing digital PT therapeutic exercise treatments to patients via our PHZIO telemedicine platform, including the most current advances and research related to the core treatment principles, rationale and components of our PHZIO treatment system.

Huge Expansion of PHZIO Exercise Content: We are in the process to significantly expanding our existing library of exercise video content from approximately 250 3-4 minute videos to over 1,000 separate exercise video.

Los Angeles Sales & Marketing Office: The Company opened its first sales and marketing office in Playa Vista, California before May 1, 2017 in order to accelerate the adoption of PHZIO and the other new digital telehealth tools to patients, physicians and PT’s in California. The company will also be hiring new sales and marketing professionals to manage the new silos of business.

eWellness will initially rollout these new telehealth solutions within California, New York and Virginia, with plans to expand nationally over the next 6 months. With these new telehealth tools, eWellness will engage with the “At-Home” Physical Therapy treatment market. This market involves physical therapy practitioners treating patients in their home instead of a clinic. The “At-Home” market model when combined with PHZIO offers patients and practitioners a means to receive and deliver PT services without having to leave work during normal business hours. Patients will be able to receive physical therapy services at almost any hour of the day. A model that is not currently employed within traditional clinical settings.

Recent Developments

On November 12, 2016, the Company entered into a Services Agreement with Bistromatics, Inc. (the “Bistromatics Agreement”), a Company incorporated under the laws of Canada (“Bistromatics”). Pursuant to the Bistromatics Agreement, Bistromatics will provide operational oversight of the Company’s Phzio System including development, content editing, client on boarding, clinic training, support & maintenance, billing, hosting and oversight and support of CRM and helpdesk system. The Company has agreed to pay a monthly base fee of $50,000 monthly until Bistromatics has successfully signed and collected the first monthly service fee for 100 Physical Therapy Clinics to start using our Platform. If and when Bistromatics provides the Company with evidence of the 100 Physical Therapy Clinics, the monthly service fee will extend to $100,000. Bistromatics will have the ability to convert any outstanding amounts that fall in arrears for 60 days into common stock at the same terms as the next round of financing or the Company’s common stock market price, whichever is higher.

Investment Agreement with Tangiers Global, LLC

On February 10, 2017, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, Tangiers committed to purchase up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over a period of up to 36 months. From time to time during the 36-month period commencing from the effectiveness of the registration statement, we may deliver a put notice to Tangiers which states the dollar amount that we intend to sell to Tangiers on a date specified in the put notice. The maximum investment amount per notice must be no more than 200% of the average daily trading dollar volume of our Common stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable put notice and such amount must not exceed an accumulative amount of $250,000. The minimum put amount is $5,000. The purchase price per share to be paid by Tangiers will be the 80% of the of lowest trading prices of the Common stock during the 5 trading days including and immediately following the date on which put notice is delivered to Tangiers. In connection with the Investment Agreement with Tangiers, we also entered into a registration rights agreement with Tangiers.

Plan of Operations

Our business model is to license our PHZIO (“PHZIO”) platform to any physical therapy (“PT”) clinic in the U.S. and or have large-scale employers use our PHZIO platform as a fully PT monitored corporate wellness program.

The Company’s initial licensee is Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”), which is owned by our CEO, Darwin Fogt, MPT. The Company is in the process of developing marketing channel partnerships with industry association members, existing software-based telemedicine providers and physical therapy billing and practice management providers. These partnerships, if completed, are anticipated to begin adding third party PT licensee revenue during the second quarter of 2017.

The Company’s PHZIO home physical therapy exercise platform has been designed to disrupt the $30 billion physical therapy and the $8 billion corporate wellness industries. PHZIO re-defines the way physical therapy can be delivered. PHZIO is the first real-time remote monitored 1-to-many physical therapy platform for home use. Due to the real-time patient monitoring feature, the PHZIO platform is insurance reimbursable by payers such as: Anthem Blue Cross, AETNA and Blue Shield.

The PHZIO Solution: A New Physical Therapy Delivery System

Patient program adherence in 2015 and 2016 was nearly 85 percent due the real-time patient monitoring and the at-home use of the platform. Now physical therapy practices have a way to scale profitably using a technology platform that can help them grow beyond the limits of the typical brick and mortar PT clinic.

Additional Treatment Protocols: Our current PHZIO platform includes a fully customizable treatment program for multiple physical therapy treatment plans including patient rehabilitations for total knee, hip and shoulder surgeries, lower and upper back ailments and other physical therapy treatments. We currently have a growing library of over 250 individual 2-4 minute exercise videos within our PHZIO platform, with additional exercise content generated as needed. The Company’s initial PHZIO application is a 6-month exercise program for patients with back, knee or hip pain. Our hip and knee programs have been designed to be integrated into any hospital or medical group’s Medicare CMS bundled payment model for post-acute care physical therapy. These programs are anticipated to be followed by woman’s health and geriatric programs by the end of the third quarter of 2017.

Our initial PHZIO platform enables employees or patients to engage with live or on-demand video based physical therapy telemedicine treatments from their home or office. Following a physician’s exam and prescription for physical therapy to treat back, knee or hip pain, a patient can be examined by a physical therapist and if found appropriate inducted in the Company’s PHZIO program that includes a progressive 6-month telemedicine exercise program (including monthly in-clinic checkups). All PHZIO treatments are monitored by a licensed therapist that sees everything the patient is doing while providing their professional guidance and feedback in real-time. This ensures treatment compliance by the patient, maintains the safety and integrity of the prescribed exercises, tracks patient metrics and captures pre-and post-treatment evaluation data. PHZIO unlocks a host of potential for revolutionizing patient treatment models and directly links back to the established brick and mortar physical therapy clinic. This unique model enables any physical therapy practice to be able to execute more patient care while utilizing their same resources, and creates more value than was ever before possible.

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an Operating Agreement with Evolution Physical Therapy (“EPT”), a company owned by our CEO, pursuant to which EPT operate our Platform and offers it to selected physical therapy patients of EPT. The Company will advance capital requested by EPT for costs specifically associated with operating the www.phzio,com platform and associated physical therapy treatments. On May 7, 2015, EPT inducted the first patient using our platform. The total (insurance reimbursed) monitored PHZIO visits in 2015 and 2016 was 1928 total patient visits that include: 2015: 699 patient visits (239 insurance reimbursed patient visits generating approximately $13,500 in gross revenue) and in 2016: 1,229 patient visits generating $1,496 (approximately 26 insurance reimbursed visits). These gross revenue figures were not sufficient to generate any gross sales for the Company. The average insurance reimbursement per PHZIO session in 2015 and 2016 was $56 (excluding co-payments). Respectively. The top line wellness goals of our program are to graduate at least 80% of inducted patients through our 6-month program. Patients should expect to experience an average of a 20% reduction in BMI, a 4-inch reduction in waist size, weight loss of at least 20 pounds, significant overall improvement in balance, coordination, flexibility, strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Patients also should score better on Functional Outcomes Scales (Oswestry and LEFS), which indicates improved functional activity levels due to reduced low back, knee and hip pain.

Our PHZIO platform, including: design, testing, exercise intervention, follow-up, and exercise demonstration, has been developed by accomplished Los Angeles based physical therapist Darwin Fogt. Mr. Fogt has extensive experience and education working with diverse populations from professional athletes to morbidly obese. He understands the most beneficial exercise prescription to achieve optimal results and has had enormous success in motivating all patient types to stay consistent in working toward their goals. Additionally, his methods have proven effective and safe as he demonstrates exercises with attention to proper form to avoid injury. Mr. Fogt has established himself as a national leader in his field and has successfully implemented progressive solutions to delivering physical therapy: he has consulted with and been published by numerous national publications including Runner’s World, Men’s Health, Men’s Journal, and various Physical Therapy specific magazines; his 13 plus years of experience include rehabilitating the general population, as well as professional athletes, Olympic gold medalists, and celebrities. He has bridged the gap between physical therapy and fitness by opening Evolution Fitness, which uses licensed physical therapists to teach high intensity circuit training fitness classes. He also founded one of the first exclusive prenatal and postnatal physical therapy clinic in the country. Mr. Fogt is a leader in advancing the profession to incorporate research-based methods and focus on, not only rehabilitation but also wellness, functional fitness, performance, and prevention. He can recognize that the national healthcare structure (federal and private insurance) is moving toward a model of prevention and that the physical therapy profession will take a larger role in providing wellness services to patients.

Innovators in other industries have solved access, cost and quality inefficiencies through the implementation of technology platforms and business models that deliver products and services on-demand and create new economies by connecting and empowering both consumers and businesses. We have taken the same approach to solving the pervasive access, cost and quality challenges facing the current access to physical therapy clinics.

Our underlying technology platform is complex, deeply integrated and purpose-built over the three years for the evolving physical therapy marketplace. Our PHZIO platform is highly scalable and can support substantial growth of third party licensees. Our PHZIO platform provides for broad interconnectivity between PT practitioners and their patients and, we believe, uniquely positions us as a focal point in the rapidly evolving PT industry to introduce innovative, technology-based solutions, such as remote patient monitoring, post-discharge treatment plan adherence and in-home care.

We plan to generate revenue from third-party PT and corporate wellness licensees on a contractually recurring per PHZIO session fee basis. Our PHZIO platform is anticipated to transform the access, cost and quality dynamics of physical therapy delivery for all of the market participants. We further believe any patient, employer, health plan or healthcare professional interested in a better approach to physical therapy is a potential PHZIO platform user.

Before even launching, we have received a high indication of interest in our service. We think the demand is warranted, but recognize that in the preliminary stages of our services, we may experience bottlenecks in our ability to meet the demand for same. Under this type of environment, it is critical to maintain awareness of the Company’s operational budget goals and how they are being met in our attempts to address demand. Regardless of our growth pace, it is critical to shareholder value that we are mindful of our operational spending.

Results of Operations during the three-month period ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2016

We had no revenues from operations during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. We expect to generate revenues during the third quarter of 2017.

Our operating expenses increased to $989,348 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 from $353,447 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase is a result of legal, accounting services, and consulting fees.

The Company recognized a net income of $4,161,845 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with a net loss of $425,608 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The significant increase was the result of the revaluation of the derivative liabilities for the convertible debt and warrants totaling $5,242,634 offset by increases in legal, accounting services and consulting fees as noted above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2017, we had negative working capital of $4,181,483 compared to negative working capital of $10,018,688 as of December 31, 2016. The majority of the decrease of negative working capital is because of the derivative liability. Cash used in operations were $309,475 and $28,369 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase in cash used in operations was because of the adjustment for gain on derivative liability and payment of accounts payable-related parties. Cash used in investing activities was $2,910 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash flows provided by financing activities were $320,475 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively. The increase in cash flows from financing activities was the issuance of convertible debt for cash. The cash balance as of March 31, 2017 was $22,085.

In response to inquiries from a number of our stockholders, our Management and Board of Directors want our stockholders and the public markets to understand that we will continue to evaluate when and if to implement any reverse split as well as any ratio thereof. Our evaluation process will take into consideration the potential impact any reverse will have on our future plans which may include application for acceptance to a national exchange, such as NASDAQ Capital Market, and will be timed to coincide with any listing application.

We believe that anticipated cash flows from operations will be insufficient to satisfy our ongoing capital requirements. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, there was a negative cash flows from operations of $309,475 compared to $28,369 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. We are seeking financing in the form of equity capital to provide the necessary working capital. Our ability to meet our obligations and continue to operate as a going concern is highly dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing. We cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or be in another form. We may not be able to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. In any of these events, we may be unable to implement our current plans which circumstances would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial conditions and results of operations.

Contingencies

The Company may be subject to lawsuits, administrative proceedings, regulatory reviews or investigations associated with its business and other matters arising in the normal conduct of its business. The following is a description of an uncertainty that is considered other than ordinary, routine and incidental to the business.

The closing of the Initial Exchange Agreement with Private Co. was conditioned upon certain, limited customary representations and warranties, as well as, among other things, our compliance with Rule 419 (“Rule 419”) of Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the consent of our shareholders as required under Rule 419. Accordingly, we conducted a “Blank Check” offering subject to Rule 419 (the “Rule 419 Offering”) and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register the shares of such offering; the Registration Statement was declared effective on September 14, 2012. We used 10% of the subscription proceeds as permitted under Rule 419 and the amount remaining in the escrow trust as of the date of the closing of the Share Exchange was $90,000 (the “Trust Account Balance”).

Rule 419 required that the Share Exchange occur on or before March 18, 2014, but due to normal negotiations regarding the transactions and the parties’ efforts to satisfy all the closing conditions, the Share Exchange did not close on such date. Accordingly, after numerous discussions with management of both parties, they entered into an Amended and Restated Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) to reflect a revised business combination structure, pursuant to which we would: (i) file a registration statement on Form 8-A (“Form 8A”) to register our common stock pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which we did on May 1, 2014 and (ii) seek to convert the participants of the Rule 419 Offering into participants of a similarly termed private offering (the “Converted Offering”), to be conducted pursuant to Regulation D, as promulgated under the Securities Act.

Fifty-two persons participated in the Rule 419 Offering and each of them gave the Company his/her/its consent to use his/her/its escrowed funds to purchase shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in the Converted Offering (the “Consent”) rather than have their funds returned. To avoid further administrative work for the investors, we believe that we took reasonable steps to inform investors of the situation and provided them with an appropriate opportunity to maintain their investment in the Company, if they so choose, or have their funds physically returned. Management believed the steps it took constituted a constructive return of the funds and therefore met the requirements of Rule 419.

However, pursuant to Rule 419(e)(2)(iv), “funds held in the escrow or trust account shall be returned by first class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five business days [if the related acquisition transaction does not occur by a date that is 18 months after the effective date of the related registration statement].” As set forth above, rather than physically return the funds, we sought consent from the investors of the Rule 419 Offering to direct their escrowed funds to the Company to instead purchase shares in the Converted Offering. The consent document was given to the investors along with a private placement memorandum describing the Converted Offering and stated that any investor who elected not to participate in the Converted Offering would get 90% of their funds physically returned. Pursuant to Rule 419(b)(2)(vi), a blank check company is entitled to use 10% of the proceed/escrowed funds; therefore, if a return of funds is required, only 90% of the proceed/escrowed funds need be returned. The Company received $100,000 proceeds and used $10,000 as per Rule 419(b)(2)(vi); therefore, only $90,000 was subject to possible return.

As disclosed in the prior amendments to the Initial Form 8-K, we have filed the prior amendments in response to comments from the SEC regarding the Form 8-K and many of those comments pertain to the Company’s potential violation of Rule 419. Although the Company has continued to provide the SEC with information and analysis as to why it believes it did not violate Rule 419, based upon latest communications with the persons reviewing the Form 8-K, they do not agree with the assessments the Company presented to them. Comments and communications indicate that Rule 419 requires a physical return of funds if a 419 offering cannot be completed because a business combination was not consummated within the required time frame; constructive return is not permitted.

Because of these communications and past comments, we are disclosing that we did not comply with the requirements of Rule 419, which required us to physically return the funds previously submitted to escrow pursuant to the Rule 419 Offering. Because of our failure to comply with Rule 419, the SEC may bring an enforcement action or commence litigation against us for failure to strictly comply with Rule 419. If any claims or actions were to be brought against us relating to our lack of compliance with Rule 419, we could be subject to penalties (including criminal penalties), required to pay fines, make damages payments or settlement payments. In addition, any claims or actions could force us to expend significant financial resources to defend ourselves, could divert the attention of our management from our core business and could harm our reputation.

Ultimately, the SEC determined to terminate its review of the Initial Form 8-K and related amendments, rather than provide us with additional opportunities to address their concerns and therefore, we did not clear their comments. It is not possible now to predict whether or when the SEC may initiate any proceedings, when this issue may be resolved or what, if any, penalties or other remedies may be imposed, and whether any such penalties or remedies would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Litigation and enforcement actions are inherently unpredictable, the outcome of any potential lawsuit or action is subject to significant uncertainties and, therefore, determining now the likelihood of a loss, any SEC enforcement action and/or the measurement of the amount of any loss is complex. Consequently, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss. Our assessment is based on an estimate and assumption that has been deemed reasonable by management, but the assessment process relies heavily on an estimate and assumption that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change that estimate and assumption. Considering the uncertainty of this issue and while Management evaluates the best and most appropriate way to resolve same, management determined to create a reserve on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the $90,000 that was subject to the Consent.

Capital Expenditure Plan

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we raised $350,000, less $29,525 for debt issuance costs, in equity and debt capital and we may be expected to require up to an additional $1.6 million in capital during the next 12 months to fully implement our business plan and fund our operations. Our plan is to utilize the equity capital that we raise, together with anticipated cash flow from operations, to fund a very significant investment in sales and marketing, concentration principally on advertising and incentivizing existing customers for the introduction of new customers, among other strategies. However, there can be no assurance that: (i) we will continue to be successful in raising equity capital in sufficient amounts and/or at terms and conditions satisfactory to the Company; or (ii) we will generate sufficient revenues from operations, to fulfill our plan of operations. Our revenues are expected to come from our PHZIO platform services. As a result, we will continue to incur operating losses unless and until we are able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our operating expenses and fund our planned sales and market efforts. There can be no assurance that the market will adopt our portal or that we will generate sufficient cash flow to fund our enhanced sales and marketing plan. In the event that we are not able to successfully: (i) raise equity capital and/or debt financing; or (ii) market and significantly increase the number of portal users and revenues from such users, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected and we will either have to delay or curtail our plan for funding our sales and marketing efforts.”

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

On April 1, 2015, the Company entered into an operating agreement with a physical therapy company (“EPT”) which is owned by the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Through the agreement, the Company agrees to provide operating capital advances for EPT to offer the Company’s PHIZIO platform to physical therapy patients. For accounting and tax purposes, the net profits or losses generated by EPT shall be allocated on a monthly basis. The Company will receive 75% of the net patient insurance reimbursements associated with the operation of the PHIZIO platform.

On January 17, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a six-month period to provide services which will include: (i) introductions to brokers; (ii) assist with research coverage; (iii) introductions to over 100 funds, investment banking firms and market makers; and (iv) a presentation speaking slot with a Gold sponsorship at the 2017 Wall Street Conference. In consideration for the services, the Company agreed to 75,000 restricted shares of common stock. These shares were issued on January 20, 2017.

On January 24, 2017, the Registrant entered into a Definitive Service Agreement (“DSA”) with Bistromatics, a company for which the Company’s officer serves as an officer, affirming that, at the time, the Company does not currently have enough authorized shares of common stock, based upon the number of issued and outstanding shares together with shares reserved for issuance, to issue Bistromatics 25,280,899 shares of common stock. In connection with the Company’s obligations under the DSA, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada for the purposes of: (A) increasing its authorized capital stock from 110,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (i) 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, to 420,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001, consisting of: (iii) 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001; and (iv) 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001. The Certificate of Amendment has been filed with the State of Nevada and the Company has filed an Information Statement on Schedule 14C, based upon the Joint Written Consent of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Majority Consenting Stockholders and implementing a reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, including shares of common stock reserved for issuance, in a ratio to be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, not to exceed a one-for-twenty (1:20) basis (the “Reverse Split”). After the Information Statement clears comments with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company must submit an application to and receive approval from FINRA for these corporate actions. The Company issued the 25,280,899 shares of common stock on April 1, 2017.

In February 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with a third party which required the issuance of a convertible note for $55,000 plus a 10% Original Issue Discount. The terms of this note are the same as the notes dated January 11 and January 31, 2017, which are that the convertible notes convert into common stock of the Company at conversion price into which any principal amount and interest (including any default interest) under the notes shall be convertible into shares of common stock shall be equal to the lesser of: (i) $0.20 or (ii) 75% of the average of the VWAPs for the five (5) trading days immediately following the 180th calendar day after the Original Issue Date, whichever is lower. There is only one pricing look back event. The notes have a 10% original issue discount and an interest rate of 8%. The due date of the notes is August 14, 2017.

In February 2017, the Company and an institutional investor entered into an agreement in which: (a) the investor agreed to fund up to $5,000,000 in reliance upon an exception provided under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities act of 1933, as amended; (b) the Company will file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC within 15 days after the Company files its annual 10K report for the year ended December 31, 2016 (The S-1 was filed on April 11, 2017); (c) the Company issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000, bearing interest at 8% (This note has not yet been funded); and (d) the Company issued a second convertible note in the principal amount of $275,000 bearing interest at 8% of which $105,000 was initially funded. With the $275,000 convertible note, the Company also issued 68,750 cashless warrants exercisable at $.25 per share.

In February 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an institutional investor pursuant to which the investor was issued two 5.5% convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $165,000.00, each in the amount of $82,500. Each of the two notes has a 10% OID such that the purchase price of each note shall be $75,000. The first note was funded and the second note shall initially be paid for by the issuance of an offsetting $75,000 secured noted issued to the Company by the investor provided that prior to conversion of the second note, the investor must have paid off the offsetting $75,000 note in cash such that the second note may not be converted until it has been paid for by the investor.

In February 2017, the Company was served by a complaint filed by the holder of a note payable. The lawsuit alleges that the Company is indebted to the note holder a promissory note stemming from four loans to the Company during the last 20 months amounting to $75,500 in total original principal bearing interest at 12% per annum, of which $45,202 has been repaid. Further, the note holder claims that, because of alleged defaults and extensions of the notes, the Company is now indebted in the amount of $253,677 inclusive of interest and penalties at an effective rate exceeding 70% per annum, far more than the maximum rate allowable in California or Louisiana. The Company and its counsel have determined that: (i) the note holder is not a licensed lender in the State of California, where the loan was made and the $75,500 was deposited and therefore was not permitted under California law to make loans in the State; and (ii) the interest rate the note holder is seeking to collect is usurious and therefore interest claimed in the lawsuit is neither collectible nor enforceable. The Company and counsel believe the lawsuit is wholly without merit and the rules of diversity of jurisdiction apply. Furthermore, the Company believes that the action should be removed from Louisiana state court to the United States Federal District Court in Baton Rouge, LA, where California law should be applied.

From time to time the Company may become a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Except as may be outlined above, the Company believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, for disclosures regarding the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates, as well as any updates further disclosed in our interim financial statements as described in this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information under Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules, regulations and forms, and (ii) that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Company issued a total of 13,810,000 shares of common stock per debt conversion of the convertible note dated November 14, 2016. The total of the debt conversion was $47,000.

In January 2017, 1,363,277 warrants were exercised as a cashless exercise for the issuance of 1,336,075 shares of common stock.

On January 19, 2017, the Company issued 700,000 shares of common stock per two separate agreements with consultants signed in December 2016. The value of these shares was $18,500.

On January 19, 2017 and March 28, 2017, the Company issued 1,400,000 and 1,000,000 shares of common stock per one of the extinguishment of debt agreements dated December 1, 2016.

On January 17, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a six-month period to provide services which will include: (i) introductions to brokers; (ii) assist with research coverage; (iii) introductions to over 100 funds, investment banking firms and market makers; and (iv) a presentation speaking slot with a Gold sponsorship at the 2017 Wall Street Conference. In consideration for the services, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock on January 20, 2017 for a value of $6,000.

On February 14, 2017, the Company issued 31,250 shares of common stock for consulting services at a value of $6,250.

On March 1, 2017, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for marketing services at a value of $19,500.

On March 28, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for a consulting services contract signed in December 2016. The value of the shares was $32,500.

ITEM 2. EXHIBITS.

(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.