EXPRESS, INC. - Annual Report: 2013 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One) | ||
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013 | ||
OR | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to | ||
Commission file number 001-34742
EXPRESS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 26-2828128 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1 Express Drive Columbus, Ohio | 43230 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (614) 474-4001
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value | New York Stock Exchange | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | o | |
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
Aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 28, 2012: $1,376,480,936.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock was 85,354,478 as of March 21, 2013.
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held on June 6, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1
Table Of Contents | ||
Part I | ||
ITEM 1. BUSINESS | ||
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS | ||
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | ||
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES | ||
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | ||
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE | ||
Part II | ||
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES | ||
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | ||
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | ||
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | ||
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | ||
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | ||
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | ||
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Part III | ||
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | ||
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | ||
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | ||
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | ||
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES | ||
Part IV | ||
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | ||
SIGNATURES | ||
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “can have,” “likely,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. For example, all statements we make relating to our estimated and projected costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates, and financial results, our plans and objectives for future operations, growth or initiatives, strategies, or the expected outcome or impact of pending or threatened litigation are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected, including, but not limited to those under the heading "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Those factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Those risks and uncertainties, as well as other risks of which we are not aware or which we currently do not believe to be material, may cause our actual future results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to make any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law, including the securities laws of the United States and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
In this section, "Express","we", "us," "the Company", and "our" refer to Express, Inc. together with its predecessors and its consolidated subsidiaries as a combined entity. Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years are referred to by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. All references herein to "2012", "2011", and "2010" refer to the 53-week period ended February 2, 2013, and the fifty-two week periods ended January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, respectively.
General
Express is a specialty apparel and accessory retailer offering both women's and men's merchandise. We have over 30 years of experience offering a distinct combination of style and quality at an attractive value, targeting women and men between 20 and 30 years old. We offer our customers an assortment of fashionable apparel and accessories to address fashion needs across multiple aspects of their lifestyles, including work, casual, jeanswear, and going-out occasions.
We opened our first store in Chicago, Illinois in 1980 as a division of L Brands, Inc. (formerly known as Limited Brands, Inc.) ("L Brands"). In 2007, investment funds managed by Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc. ("Golden Gate") acquired a controlling interest in the Express division from L Brands. In May 2010, Express, Inc., the parent company of subsidiaries that operate our business, was converted into a Delaware corporation and completed an initial public offering ("IPO"), including listing its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we refer to all of the events that occurred in connection with the IPO as the "Reorganization".
As of February 2, 2013, we operated 625 stores across the United States, in Canada, and in Puerto Rico. Our stores are located primarily in high-traffic shopping malls, lifestyle centers, and street locations, and average approximately 8,700 gross square feet. We also sell our products through our e-commerce website, express.com, and have franchise agreements with franchisees who operate Express stores in Latin America and the Middle East. Our product assortment is a mix of core styles balanced with the latest fashions, a combination we believe our customers look for and value in our brand. Our 2012 net sales were comprised of approximately 62% women's merchandise and approximately 38% men's merchandise.
We report one segment, which includes the operation of our brick and mortar retail stores and the express.com e-commerce website. Additional information about our reportable segment can be found in Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our primary competitive strengths are as follows:
Established Lifestyle Brand. With over 30 years of heritage, the Express brand represents a distinctive point of view that is sexy, sophisticated, and social. We believe that our customers view Express as a fashion authority and look to us to provide them with the latest fashions. The Express brand differentiates itself by offering (1) a balanced assortment of core styles and the latest fashions; (2) products that address fashion needs across multiple wearing occasions, including work, casual, jeanswear and going-out occasions; and (3) quality products at an attractive value.
Attractive Market and Customer Demographic. We are part of the specialty apparel market focusing on 20 to 30 year old women and men. We believe the specialty apparel market is a significant piece of the total apparel market for this demographic and that the Express brand appeals to a particularly attractive subset of this group, who we believe spend a higher percentage of their budget on fashion compared to the broader population.
Go-To-Market Strategy. We design the majority of our product assortment in our New York City design studio based on an extensive review of fashion trends, styles, fabrics, colors, fits, and prices for the upcoming season. Our product testing processes allow us to test approximately three-quarters of our merchandise in select stores before placing orders for our broader store base. In addition, we assess sales data and new product development on a weekly basis in order to make in-season inventory adjustments where possible, which allows us to respond to the latest trends. We believe that we have an efficient, diversified, and flexible supply chain, including a network of third-party manufacturers located throughout the world, that allows us to quickly identify and respond to trends and bring a tested assortment of high quality products at competitive prices to our stores. We believe our model allows us to better meet customer demand and enables us to reduce inventory risk and improve product margins through reduced markdowns.
4
Optimized Real Estate Portfolio. Our stores are located in high-traffic shopping malls, lifestyle centers, and street locations in 47 states across the United States, as well as in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and two provinces in Canada. As a result of our strong brand and established retail presence of over 30 years, we have been able to acquire high-traffic locations in most retail centers in which we operate. Substantially all of our stores were profitable in 2012.
Proven and Experienced Team. Michael Weiss, our Chief Executive Officer, has more than 40 years of experience in the fashion industry and has served as our Chief Executive Officer for over 20 years. In addition, our senior management team has an extensive amount of experience across a broad range of disciplines in the specialty retail industry, including design, sourcing, merchandising, planning and allocation, and real estate. Experience and tenure with Express extends deep into our organization, including district and store managers, who have been with Express for a number of years.
Growth Strategy
Key elements of our business and growth strategies include the following:
Improve Sales and Margins of Our Existing Retail Stores. We seek to grow our comparable sales and operating margins through execution of our go-to-market strategy. Our go-to-market strategy is designed to allow us to offer a product assortment that is more appealing to our customers, which allows us to reduce inventory risk and improve product margins through reduced markdowns. Additionally, we have modified our promotional pricing to provide more clarity to our customers and have also introduced additional women's and men's fragrances and women's and men's watches.
Expand Our Store Base. We believe there are attractive, high-traffic locations that present opportunities for us to expand our store base. We currently plan to open approximately 7 stores, net of closures, in 2013, including 4 stores in Canada, representing a 2 % increase in square footage. We also have plans to open 2 flagship locations, one in Union Square in San Francisco and the other in Times Square in New York. The Union Square location, which is approximately 16,000 square feet, is expected to open in late fall 2013, while the Times Square location, which is approximately 30,000 square feet, is expected to open in spring 2014. During 2012, we opened 16 stores in the United States and Canada, net of closures, growing our square footage by 3%.
Expand Our e-Commerce Platform. We believe that our target customer regularly shops online, and we see continued opportunity to grow our e-commerce business by providing our customers with a seamless retailing experience. In addition, we believe our multi-channel platform will allow us to continue to improve overall profit margins as our e-commerce business becomes an increased percentage of our sales. In 2012, e-commerce represented 13% of our total sales.
Expand Internationally. We believe Express has the potential to be a successful global brand. During 2012, we entered into new franchise agreements covering portions of Latin America and ended the year with 11 franchisee-operated stores in the Middle East and 4 franchisee-operated stores in Latin America. Over the next 5 years, we believe there are opportunities to expand the Express brand internationally through additional franchise agreements with local partners across the globe, joint venture relationships, and company-owned stores in targeted countries.
See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information regarding progress against our growth pillars in the current year.
Our Products
We offer our customers an assortment of fashionable merchandise to address multiple wearing occasions, including work, casual, jeanswear, and going-out occasions. The majority of our products are created by our in-house design team and range from core styles to the latest fashions. We believe we have developed a portfolio of products that have significant brand value, including the Editor pant and 1MX shirt. We focus on providing our customers with attractively-priced merchandise that is well-constructed and made from quality materials that are designed to last for several seasons, and believe our customers value our consistent fit and detailing.
We design our products and display them in our stores in a coordinated manner to encourage our customers to purchase multi-item outfits as opposed to individual items. We believe this allows us to better meet our customers' shopping objectives while differentiating our product line from competitors. On average, our customers purchase 2 to 3 items per transaction. We monitor cross-selling trends in order to optimize our in-store and online product assortment and collection recommendations.
Design and Merchandising
Our internal design and merchandising team designs quality products consistent with our brand image. We have strategically located our design studio on 5th Avenue in New York City to ensure that our staff of designers are immersed in the heart of
5
New York City's fashion community and have easy access to inspiration from other high-fashion markets here and abroad. We believe our dual offices in New York City, New York and Columbus, Ohio provide us a balanced design and merchandising perspective.
We develop 4 seasonal collections per year and then subdivide them so that new products are introduced more frequently in our stores, providing on-going freshness to the existing merchandise assortment. The seasonal design process begins approximately 45 weeks in advance of store delivery with a collaborative planning effort among design, merchandising, manufacturing, planning and allocation, and finance departments.
Sourcing
Our Sourcing Methods
We utilize a broad base of manufacturers located throughout the world that we believe produce goods at the level of quality that our customers demand and can supply products to us on a timely basis at competitive prices. We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities and, as a result, contract with third-party vendors for production of all of our merchandise. We purchase both apparel and accessories through intermediaries and directly from manufacturers. Our relationships with direct manufacturers are sometimes supported by intermediaries who help coordinate our purchasing requirements with the factories. In exchange for a commission, these buying agents identify suitable vendors and coordinate our purchasing requirements with vendors by placing orders for merchandise on our behalf, ensuring the timely delivery of goods to us, obtaining samples of merchandise produced in factories, inspecting finished merchandise, and carrying out administrative communications on our behalf.
We purchase the majority of our merchandise outside of the United States through arrangements with approximately 70 vendors utilizing approximately 335 foreign manufacturing facilities located in approximately 25 countries throughout the world, primarily in Asia and South and Central America. Our top 10 manufacturers, based on cost, supplied approximately 30% of our merchandise in 2012. We purchase our merchandise using purchase orders and, therefore, are not subject to long-term production contracts with any of our vendors, manufacturers, or buying agents.
Quality Assurance and Compliance Monitoring
Each factory, subcontractor, supplier, and agent that manufactures our merchandise is required to adhere to our Code of Vendor Conduct. This is designed to ensure that each of our suppliers' operations are conducted in a legal, ethical, and responsible manner. Our Code of Vendor Conduct requires that each of our suppliers operates in compliance with applicable wage, benefit, working hours, and other local laws. It also forbids the use of practices such as child labor or forced labor. We monitor compliance through the use of third parties who conduct regular factory audits.
Distribution
We centrally distribute our products from distribution centers in Columbus and Groveport, Ohio that are owned and operated by third parties. Virtually all of our merchandise is received, processed, warehoused, and distributed through the Columbus distribution facility. Merchandise is typically shipped to our stores and to the Groveport distribution facility via third-party delivery services multiple times per week, providing them with a steady flow of new inventory.
The third-party distribution facility in Groveport is used to fulfill all orders placed through our website. Merchandise at this facility is received from our Columbus distribution facility and sent directly to customers via third-party delivery services. We believe that this distribution center's proximity to our home office in Columbus provides several benefits, including faster replenishment of out-of-stock inventory, more efficient trucking lanes to our customers, reduced delivery costs, and ease of oversight and management of our third party provider.
Our Stores Locations
As of February 2, 2013, we operated 625 stores in 47 states across the United States, as well as in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Canada.
The following store list shows the number of stores we operated in the United States and Puerto Rico as of February 2, 2013:
6
Location | Count | Location | Count | Location | Count | |||||
Alabama | 9 | Kentucky | 6 | North Dakota | 1 | |||||
Arizona | 9 | Louisiana | 8 | Ohio | 20 | |||||
Arkansas | 3 | Maine | 2 | Oklahoma | 5 | |||||
California | 76 | Maryland | 12 | Oregon | 4 | |||||
Colorado | 10 | Massachusetts | 20 | Pennsylvania | 27 | |||||
Connecticut | 10 | Michigan | 20 | Puerto Rico | 3 | |||||
Delaware | 3 | Minnesota | 12 | Rhode Island | 3 | |||||
District of Columbia | 1 | Mississippi | 3 | South Carolina | 9 | |||||
Florida | 49 | Missouri | 11 | South Dakota | 1 | |||||
Georgia | 19 | Nebraska | 3 | Tennessee | 11 | |||||
Hawaii | 1 | Nevada | 7 | Texas | 52 | |||||
Idaho | 1 | New Hampshire | 4 | Utah | 5 | |||||
Illinois | 33 | New Jersey | 20 | Vermont | 1 | |||||
Indiana | 11 | New Mexico | 3 | Virginia | 19 | |||||
Iowa | 7 | New York | 43 | Washington | 9 | |||||
Kansas | 4 | North Carolina | 14 | West Virginia | 1 | |||||
Wisconsin | 9 | |||||||||
Total | 614 | |||||||||
The following store list shows the number of stores we operated in Canada as of February 2, 2013:
Location | Count | |
Alberta | 4 | |
British Columbia | 2 | |
Ontario | 5 | |
Total | 11 | |
The following store list shows the number of stores operated by our franchisees in the Middle East and Latin America as of February 2, 2013:
Location | Count | |
Middle East | ||
Kuwait | 1 | |
United Arab Emirates | 4 | |
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | 5 | |
Lebanon | 1 | |
Latin America | ||
Panama | 1 | |
Peru | 1 | |
Mexico | 2 | |
Total | 15 | |
Store Design and Environment
We design our stores to create a distinctive and engaging shopping environment that we believe resonates with our customers. Our stores feature a vibrant and youthful look, bright signage, and popular music. Our stores are constructed and finished to allow us to efficiently shift merchandise displays throughout the year as seasons dictate. In July 2011, we introduced a new store design that is consistent with our design philosophy. This new store design was utilized for new and remodeled stores
7
beginning in 2012. As of February 2, 2013, we operate 44 stores in the new design format. To further enhance our customers' experience, we seek to attract enthusiastic store associates who are knowledgeable about our products and able to offer superior customer service and expertise. We believe that our store atmosphere enhances our brand as a provider of the latest fashions.
Competition
The specialty apparel retail market is highly competitive. We compete with other brick-and-mortar and e-commerce retailers that engage in the retail sale of women's and men's apparel, accessories, and similar merchandise. We compete on the basis of a combination of factors, including, among others, breadth, quality, price, and style of merchandise offered, in-store and on-line experience, level of customer service, and brand image. See "Competitive Strengths" for a description of how we believe we differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Our success depends in substantial part on our ability to anticipate and respond quickly to fashion trends, maintain the strength of the Express brand in the United States, and increase awareness of the Express brand globally.
Store Management and Training
We believe that our store managers and associates are important to our success. On average, our store managers have been with Express for 7 years. We believe our managers and associates deliver a superior shopping experience as a result of the training we provide, the culture of accountability we foster, the incentives we offer, and the decision-making authority we grant to store managers.
Marketing and Brand Building
We use a variety of marketing vehicles to increase customer traffic and build brand loyalty. These include direct mail offers, e-mail communications, in-store promotions, print, television and digital advertising, and social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter. We offer a private-label credit card through an agreement with World Financial Network National Bank ("WFNNB") under which WFNNB owns the credit card accounts and Alliance Data Systems Corporation provides services to our private-label credit card customers. All of our proprietary credit cards carry the Express logo. We also have a tender-agnostic customer loyalty program, Express NEXT, that offers customers the opportunity to earn rewards in conjunction with purchases of Express product and other engagement with the Express brand. We believe the Express NEXT program encourages frequent store and website visits and promotes multiple-item purchases, thereby cultivating customer loyalty to the Express brand, resulting in a potential for increased sales.
Technology
We actively look for ways to use technology to improve the customer experience, both in-store and on-line, and differentiate ourselves from competitors. After the Christmas holiday, we transitioned our website hosting from a third party to an internal team that will utilize a platform customized to our specific needs. This will enhance overall system performance, provide improved analytics and more creative control, and enable delivery of a more seamless experience between our stores and website. Online sales are currently supported from the store point-of-sale system. Over time, this enhanced platform will enable us to offer additional features, such as placing orders online and picking up selections at a designated store.
Our digital marketing efforts include the use of social media and mobile applications. They are designed to reach our customers using the communication and shopping channels widely adopted by our customers. As a result, we can more successfully keep our brand front of mind and also make it easier for customers to purchase from us.
Our information technology systems provide a full range of business process support and information to our store, merchandising, financial, and real estate business teams. We utilize a combination of customized and industry standard software systems to provide various functions related to point-of-sale, inventory management, design, planning and allocation, and financial reporting. During 2012, we made additional investments to upgrade our general ledger, stock ledger, and allocation systems to provide additional capabilities to support our 4 growth pillars, particularly international expansion. Looking ahead, we anticipate additional capital expenditures for upgrades to our human resources information and merchandise management systems to further support our 4 growth pillars.
Intellectual Property
The Express trademark and certain variations thereon, such as Express World Brand, are registered or are subject to pending trademark applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or with the registries of many foreign countries. In addition, we own domain names, including express.com which include our primary trademarks. We believe our material trademarks have significant value, and we vigorously protect them against infringement.
8
Regulation and Legislation
We are subject to labor and employment laws, including minimum wage requirements, laws governing advertising and promotions, privacy laws, safety regulations, and other laws, such as consumer protection regulations that govern product standards and regulations with respect to the operation of our stores. We monitor changes in these laws and believe that we are in material compliance with applicable laws.
Substantially all of our products are manufactured outside the United States. These products are imported and are subject to United States customs laws, which impose tariffs as well as import quota restrictions for textiles and apparel. Some of our imported products are eligible for duty-advantaged programs. While importation of goods from foreign countries from which we buy our products may be subject to embargo by United States customs authorities if shipments exceed quota limits, we closely monitor import quotas and believe we have a diversified sourcing network to allow us to efficiently shift production to factories located in countries with a similar manufacturing base if necessary.
Employees
We currently employ approximately 17,000 associates. Approximately 700 employees are based at our home office locations in either Columbus or New York City, approximately 70 are field-based regional or district managers, approximately 1,600 are in-store managers or co-managers, and approximately 14,500 are in-store sales associates. None of our employees are represented by a union, and we have had no labor-related work stoppages. We believe our relations with our employees are good.
Seasonality
Our business is seasonal and, historically, we have realized a higher portion of our net sales and net income in the third and fourth quarters due primarily to early Fall selling patterns as well as the impact of the holiday season. In 2012, approximately 56% of our net sales were generated in the Fall season (third and fourth quarters), while approximately 44% were generated in the Spring season (first and second quarters). Cash needs are typically higher in the first and third quarters due to inventory-related working capital requirements for early Fall and holiday selling periods. Our business is also subject, at certain times, to calendar shifts, which may occur during key selling periods close to holidays such as Easter, Thanksgiving, and Christmas, and regional fluctuations for events such as sales tax holidays.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge, on our website, www.express.com, copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act of 1934"), as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically with, or otherwise furnishing it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains electronic filings at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website. Additionally, the information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Our business faces a number of risks. The risks described below are the items of most concern to us, however these are not all of the risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations.
RISK FACTORS
Our business is sensitive to consumer spending and general economic conditions, and a continued or further economic slowdown could adversely affect our financial performance.
Consumer purchases of discretionary retail items, including our products, generally decline during recessionary periods and other periods where disposable income is adversely affected. Our performance is subject to factors that affect domestic and worldwide economic conditions, including employment, consumer debt, reductions in net worth, residential real estate and mortgage markets, taxation, fuel and energy prices, interest rates, consumer confidence, value of the United States dollar versus foreign currencies, and other macroeconomic factors. A deterioration in economic conditions or increasing unemployment levels may reduce the level of consumer spending and inhibit consumers' use of credit, which may adversely affect our revenues and profits. In recessionary periods, we may have to increase the number of promotional sales or otherwise dispose of
9
inventory for which we have previously paid to manufacture, which could adversely affect our profitability. Our financial performance is particularly susceptible to economic and other conditions in regions or states where we have a significant number of stores. A deterioration of economic conditions or slowdown in the economy could adversely affect shopping center traffic and new shopping center development and could materially adversely affect us.
In addition, recessionary periods may exacerbate some of the risks noted below, including consumer demand, strain on available resources, store growth, interruption of the flow of merchandise from key vendors, and foreign exchange rate fluctuations. The risks could be exacerbated individually or collectively.
Our business is highly dependent upon our ability to identify and respond to new and changing fashion trends, customer preferences and other related factors, and our inability to identify and respond to these new trends may lead to inventory markdowns and write-offs, which could adversely affect us and our brand image.
Our focus on fashion-conscious young women and men means that we have a target market of customers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to change. Our success depends in large part upon our ability to effectively identify and respond to changing fashion trends and consumer demands and to translate market trends into appropriate, saleable product offerings. Our failure to identify and react appropriately to new and changing fashion trends or tastes, or to accurately forecast demand for certain product offerings could lead to, among other things, excess or insufficient amounts of inventory, markdowns, and write-offs, which could materially adversely affect our business and our brand image. Because our success depends significantly on our brand image, damage to our brand image as a result of our failure to respond to changing fashion trends could have a negative impact on us.
We often place orders for the manufacture and purchase of merchandise well ahead of the season in which that merchandise will be sold. Therefore, we are vulnerable to changes in consumer preference and demand between the time we design and order our merchandise and the season in which this merchandise will be sold. There can be no assurance that our new product offerings will have the same level of acceptance as our product offerings in the past or that we will be able to adequately and timely respond to the preferences of our customers. The failure of any new product offerings to appeal to our customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our sales and profitability fluctuate on a seasonal basis and are affected by a variety of other factors.
Our sales and results of operations are affected by a variety of factors, including fashion trends, changes in our merchandise mix, the ratio of online sales to store sales, the effectiveness of our inventory management, actions of competitors or mall anchor tenants, holiday or seasonal periods, changes in general economic conditions and consumer spending patterns, the timing of promotional events, customer traffic and weather conditions. As a result, our results of operations fluctuate on a quarterly basis and relative to corresponding periods in prior years, and any of these factors could adversely affect our business and could cause our results of operations to decline. For example, our third and fourth quarter net sales are impacted by early Fall shopping trends and the holiday season. Any significant decrease in net sales during the early Fall selling period or the holiday season would have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, in order to prepare for these seasons, we must order and keep in stock significantly more merchandise than we carry during other parts of the year. This inventory build-up may require us to expend cash faster than we generate it by our operations during this period. Any unanticipated decrease in demand for our products during these peak shopping seasons could require us to sell excess inventory at a substantial markdown, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, profitability, ability to repay indebtedness, and our brand image with customers.
We could face increased competition from other retailers that could adversely affect our ability to generate higher net sales and our ability to obtain favorable store locations.
We face substantial competition in the specialty retail apparel and accessory industry. We compete with other brick-and-mortar and e-commerce retailers that engage in the retail sale of women's and men's apparel, accessories, and similar merchandise. We compete on the basis of a combination of factors, including, among others, breadth, quality, price, and style of merchandise offered, in-store and on-line experience, level of customer service, ability to offer new and emerging fashion trends, and brand image. Our success depends in substantial part on our ability to anticipate and respond quickly to fashion trends, maintain the strength of the Express brand in the United States, and increase awareness for the Express brand globally.
Some of our competitors have greater financial, marketing, and other resources available. In many cases, our competitors sell their products in stores that are located in the same shopping malls or lifestyle centers as our stores. In addition to competing for sales, we compete for favorable site locations and lease terms in shopping malls and lifestyle centers, and our competitors may be able to secure more favorable locations than us as a result of their relationships with, or appeal to, landlords. We also compete with other retailers for personnel. Our competitors may also sell substantially similar products at reduced prices through the Internet or through outlet centers or discount stores, increasing the competitive pricing pressure for those products. We cannot assure you that we will continue to be able to compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Our
10
expansion into markets served by our competitors and entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our ability to attract customers to our stores that are located in malls or other shopping centers depends heavily on the success of these malls and shopping centers, and any decrease in customer traffic in these malls or shopping centers could cause our net sales to be less than expected.
A significant number of our stores are located in malls and other shopping centers. Sales at these stores are dependent, to a significant degree, upon the volume of traffic in those shopping centers and the surrounding area. Our stores benefit from the ability of a shopping center's other tenants, particularly anchor stores, such as department stores, to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of our stores and the continuing popularity of the shopping center as a shopping destination. Our sales volume and traffic generally may be adversely affected by, among other things, a decrease in popularity of malls or other shopping centers in which our stores are located, the closing of anchor stores important to our business, a decline in popularity of other stores in the malls or other shopping centers in which our stores are located, or a deterioration in the financial condition of shopping center operators or developers which could, for example, limit their ability to finance tenant improvements for us and other retailers. A reduction in consumer traffic as a result of these or any other factors, or our inability to obtain or maintain favorable store locations within malls or other shopping centers, could have a material adverse effect on us.
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities and therefore depend upon independent third parties for the manufacture of all of our merchandise, and any inability of a manufacturer to ship goods to our specifications or to operate in compliance with applicable laws could negatively impact our business.
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. As a result, we are dependent upon our timely receipt of quality merchandise from third-party manufacturers. A manufacturer's inability to ship orders to us in a timely manner or meet our quality standards could cause delays in responding to consumer demands and negatively affect consumer confidence in the quality and value of our brand or negatively impact our competitive position, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, we are susceptible to increases in sourcing costs, which we may not be able to pass on to customers, and changes in payment terms from manufacturers, which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Failure by our manufacturers to comply with our guidelines also exposes us to various risks, including with respect to use of acceptable labor practices and compliance with applicable laws. We do not independently investigate whether our vendors and manufacturers use acceptable labor practices and comply with applicable laws, such as child labor and other labor laws, and instead rely on audits performed by several third-party auditors. Our business may be negatively impacted should any of our manufacturers experience an interruption in operations, including due to labor disputes and failure to comply with laws, and our business may suffer from negative publicity for using manufacturers that do not engage in acceptable labor, environmental, or other socially responsible practices or fail to comply with applicable laws. Any of these results could harm our brand image and have a material adverse effect on our business and growth.
The raw materials used to manufacture our products and our distribution and labor costs are subject to availability constraints and price volatility, which could result in increased costs.
The raw materials used to manufacture our merchandise are subject to availability constraints and price volatility caused by high demand for cotton, high demand for petroleum-based synthetic and other fabrics, weather conditions, supply conditions, government regulations, economic climate, and other unpredictable factors.
In addition, our transportation and labor costs are subject to price volatility caused by the price of oil, supply of labor, governmental regulations, economic climate and other unpredictable factors. Increases in the demand for, or the price of, raw materials used to manufacture our merchandise and increases in transportation and labor costs could each have a material adverse effect on our cost of sales or our ability to meet our customers' needs. We may not be able to pass all or a material portion of such higher raw material costs on to our customers, which could negatively impact our profitability. Any material costs that are passed on to customers may result in a reduction in our net sales.
The interruption of the flow of merchandise from international manufacturers could disrupt our supply chain.
We purchase the majority of our merchandise outside of the United States through arrangements with approximately 70 vendors, utilizing approximately 335 foreign manufacturing facilities located throughout the world, primarily in Asia and Central and South America. Political, social or economic instability in Asia, Central or South America, or in other regions in which our manufacturers are located, could cause disruptions in trade, including exports. Other events that could also cause disruptions to exports include:
11
• | the imposition of additional trade law provisions or regulations; |
• | the imposition of additional duties, tariffs, and other charges on imports and exports; |
• | quotas imposed by bilateral textile agreements; |
• | foreign currency fluctuations; |
• | natural disasters; |
• | restrictions on the transfer of funds; |
• | the financial instability or bankruptcy of manufacturers; and |
• | significant labor disputes, such as dock strikes. |
We cannot predict whether the countries in which our merchandise is manufactured, or may be manufactured in the future, will be subject to new or additional trade restrictions imposed by the United States or other foreign governments, including the likelihood, type, or effect of any such restrictions. Trade restrictions, including new or increased tariffs or quotas, embargos, safeguards, and customs restrictions against apparel items, as well as United States or foreign labor strikes and work stoppages or boycotts, could increase the cost or reduce the supply of apparel available to us and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
If we encounter difficulties associated with distribution facilities or if they were to shut down for any reason, we could face shortages of inventory, delayed shipments to our online customers, and harm to our reputation. Any of these issues could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.
Our distribution facilities are operated by third parties. Our Columbus facility operates as our central distribution facility and supports our entire domestic business, as all of our merchandise is shipped to the central distribution facility from our vendors and is then packaged and shipped to our stores or the e-commerce distribution facility in Groveport for further distribution to our online customers. The success of our stores and the satisfaction of our online customers depend on their timely receipt of merchandise. The efficient flow of our merchandise requires that the third parties who operate the distribution facilities have adequate capacity in both distribution facilities to support our current level of operations and any anticipated increased levels that may follow from the growth of our business. If we encounter difficulties with the distribution facilities or in our relationships with the third parties who operate the facilities, or if either facility were to shut down for any reason, including as a result of fire or other natural disaster or work stoppage, we could face shortages of inventory, resulting in “out of stock” conditions in our stores, incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to both our stores and online customers, and experience dissatisfaction from our customers. Any of these issues could have a material adverse effect on our business and harm our reputation.
We rely upon independent third-party transportation providers for substantially all of our product shipments and are subject to increased shipping costs as well as the potential inability of our third-party transportation providers to deliver on a timely basis.
We currently rely upon independent third-party transportation providers for substantially all of our product shipments, including shipments to and from all of our stores and to our customers. Our utilization of these delivery services for shipments is subject to risks, including increases in fuel prices, which would increase our shipping costs, and employee strikes and inclement weather, which may impact a shipping company's ability to provide delivery services that adequately meet our shipping needs. If we change the shipping companies we use, we could face logistical difficulties that could adversely affect deliveries, and we would incur costs and expend resources in connection with such change. Moreover, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as those received from our current independent third-party transportation providers which, in turn, would increase our costs.
We depend on key executive management and may not be able to retain or replace these individuals or recruit additional personnel, which could harm our business.
We depend on the leadership and experience of our key executive management. The loss of the services of any of our executive management members could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects, as we may not be able to find suitable individuals to replace such personnel on a timely basis or without incurring increased costs, or at all. We believe that our future success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. There is a high level of competition for experienced, successful personnel in the retail industry. Our inability to meet our staffing requirements in the future could impair our growth and harm our business.
12
Our growth strategy, including our international expansion plan, is dependent on a number of factors, any of which could strain our resources or delay or prevent the successful penetration into new markets.
Our growth strategy is partially dependent on opening new stores across North America, remodeling existing stores in a timely manner and operating them profitably. Additional factors required for the successful implementation of our growth strategy include, but are not limited to, obtaining desirable store locations, negotiating acceptable leases, completing projects on budget, supplying proper levels of merchandise and successfully hiring and training store managers and sales associates. In order to optimize profitability for new stores, we must secure desirable retail lease space when opening stores in new and existing markets. We must choose store sites, execute favorable real estate transactions on terms that are acceptable to us, hire competent personnel and effectively open and operate these new stores. We historically have received landlord allowances for store build outs, which offset certain capital expenditures we must make to open a new store. If landlord allowances cease to be available to us in the future or are decreased, opening new stores would require more capital outlay, which could adversely affect our ability to continue opening new stores. To the extent we open new stores in markets where we have existing stores, our existing stores in those markets may experience reduced net sales.
Additionally, we plan to expand our business internationally through franchise agreements, joint ventures, and company-owned and operated stores in select markets, and these plans could be negatively impacted by a variety of factors. We may be unable to find acceptable partners with whom we can enter into agreements with, negotiate acceptable terms for these agreements, and gain acceptance from consumers outside of the United States. Franchise agreements also create the inherent risk as to whether such third parties are able to both effectively operate the businesses and appropriately project our brand image in their respective markets. Ineffective or inappropriate operation of the franchise businesses or projection of our brand image could create difficulties in the execution of our international expansion plan.
Our domestic growth and international expansion plans will place increased demands on our financial, operational, managerial, and administrative resources. These increased demands may cause us to operate our business less efficiently, which in turn could cause deterioration in the performance of our existing stores. Furthermore, relating to our international expansion, our ability to conduct business in international markets may be affected by legal, regulatory, political, and economic risks, including our unfamiliarity with local business and legal environments in other areas of the world. Our international expansion strategy and success could also be adversely impacted by the global economy, as well as by fluctuations in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies. Our planned growth will also require additional infrastructure for the development, maintenance, and monitoring of new stores and our e-commerce business. In addition, if our current management systems and information systems are insufficient to support this expansion, our ability to open new stores and to manage our existing stores, e-commerce business, and franchise arrangements would be adversely affected. If we fail to continue to improve our infrastructure, we may be unable to implement our growth strategy or maintain current levels of operating performance in our existing stores.
Our business depends in part on a strong brand image, and if we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand, particularly in new markets where we have limited brand recognition, we may be unable to attract sufficient numbers of customers to our stores or sell sufficient quantities of our products.
Our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to our brand image. Our reputation could be jeopardized if we fail to maintain high standards for merchandise quality and integrity. Any negative publicity about these types of concerns may reduce demand for our merchandise. Failure to maintain high ethical, social, and environmental standards for all of our operations and activities or adverse publicity regarding our responses to these concerns could also jeopardize our reputation. Failure to comply with local laws and regulations, to maintain an effective system of internal controls, or to provide accurate and timely financial statement information could also hurt our reputation. Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence for any of these reasons could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation.
We are subject to risks associated with leasing substantial amounts of space, including future increases in occupancy costs.
We lease all of our store locations, our corporate offices and our central distribution facility. We typically occupy our stores under operating leases with terms of ten years, with options to renew for additional multi-year periods thereafter. In the future, we may not be able to negotiate favorable lease terms. Our inability to do so may cause our occupancy costs to be higher in future years or may force us to close stores in desirable locations.
Some of our leases have early cancellation clauses, which permit the lease to be terminated by us or the landlord if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods or if the center does not meet specified occupancy standards. In addition to future minimum lease payments, some of our store leases provide for additional rental payments based on a percentage of net sales, or “percentage rent,” if sales at the respective stores exceed specified levels, as well as the payment of common area maintenance charges, real property insurance, and real estate taxes. Many of our lease agreements have defined escalating rent provisions
13
over the initial term and any extensions. As we expand our store base, our lease expense and our cash outlays for rent under the lease terms will increase.
We depend on cash flow from operations to pay our lease expenses. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities to fund these expenses, we may not be able to service our lease expenses, which could materially harm our business.
If an existing or future store is not profitable, and we decide to close it, we may nonetheless be committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease including, among other things, paying the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Moreover, even if a lease has an early cancellation clause, we may not satisfy the contractual requirements for early cancellation under that lease. Our inability to enter into new leases or renew existing leases on terms acceptable to us or be released from our obligations under leases for stores that we close could materially adversely affect us.
We rely on third parties to provide us with certain key services for our business. If any of these third parties fails to perform their obligations to us or declines to provide services to us in the future, we may suffer a disruption to our business. Furthermore, we may be unable to provide these services or implement substitute arrangements on a timely and cost-effective basis on terms favorable to us.
We rely on many different third parties to provide us with certain key services. For example, we rely on a third party to operate our central distribution facility in Columbus, Ohio and to provide certain inbound and outbound transportation and delivery services, distribution services, customs, and brokerage services. We also rely on another third party to provide us with logistics and other services related to our e-commerce operations. In connection with our sourcing activities, we rely on approximately 70 buying agents and vendors to help us source products from approximately 335 manufacturing facilities, and in connection with our marketing activities, we rely on a third parties to administer our customer database, our loyalty program, and our gift cards. We also rely on a third party to administer our payroll. If any of these third parties fails to perform their obligations to us or declines to provide services to us in the future, we may suffer a disruption to our business. Furthermore, we may be unable to provide these services or implement substitute arrangements on a timely and cost-effective basis on terms favorable to us.
We rely significantly on information systems and any failure, inadequacy, interruption, or security failure of those systems could harm our ability to effectively operate our business, harm our net sales, increase our expenses, and harm our reputation.
Our ability to effectively manage and maintain our inventory, ship products to our stores and our customers on a timely basis, communicate with our customers, and conduct customer transactions depends significantly on our information systems. To manage the growth of our operations, we will need to continue to improve and expand our operational and financial systems, real estate management systems, transaction processing, internal controls, and business processes. In doing so, we could encounter implementation issues and incur substantial additional expenses. The failure of our information systems to operate effectively, problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems or expanding them into new stores, or a breach in security of these systems could adversely impact the promptness and accuracy of our merchandise distribution, transaction processing, financial accounting and reporting, the efficiency of our operations, and our ability to properly forecast earnings and cash requirements. We could be required to make significant additional expenditures to remediate any such failure, problem, or breach. Such events may have a material adverse effect on us.
We sell merchandise over the Internet through our website, express.com. Our Internet operations may be affected by our reliance on third-party hardware and software providers, technology changes, risks related to the failure of computer systems that operate the Internet business, telecommunications failures, electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions. Furthermore, our ability to conduct business on the Internet may be affected by liability for online content, patent infringement, and state and federal privacy laws.
Experienced computer programmers and hackers, or even internal users, may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information or that of third parties, including our customers, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. In addition, employee error, malfeasance or other errors in the storage, use, or transmission of any such information could result in a disclosure to third parties outside of our network. As a result, we could incur significant expenses addressing problems created by any such inadvertent disclosure or any security breaches of our network. This risk is heightened because we collect and store customer information, including credit card information, and use certain customer information for marketing purposes. Any compromise of customer information could subject us to customer or government litigation and harm our reputation, which could adversely affect our business and growth.
14
There are claims made against us from time to time that can result in litigation or regulatory proceedings which could distract management from our business activities and result in significant liability.
We face the risk of litigation and other claims against us. Litigation and other claims arise in the ordinary course of our business and include commercial disputes, intellectual property issues, consumer protection and privacy matters, product-oriented allegations, employee claims, and premise liability claims. Express, LLC is named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit alleging claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and other state labor law violations. See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any claims could result in litigation against us and could also result in regulatory proceedings being brought against us by various federal and state agencies that regulate our business, including the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Often these cases raise complex factual and legal issues, which are subject to risks and uncertainties and which could require significant management time. Litigation and other claims and regulatory proceedings against us could result in unexpected expenses and liability, and could also materially adversely affect our operations and our reputation.
In addition, we may be subject to liability if we infringe the trademarks or other intellectual property rights of third parties. If we were to be found liable for any such infringement, we could be required to pay substantial damages and could be subject to injunctions preventing further infringement. Such infringement claims could harm our brand image and any payments we are required to make and any injunctions we are required to comply with as a result of such infringement actions could adversely affect our financial results.
Changes in laws, including employment laws and laws related to our merchandise, could make conducting our business more expensive or otherwise change the way we do business.
We are subject to numerous regulations, including labor and employment, product safety, customs, consumer protection, privacy, and zoning and occupancy laws and ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the importation, promotion, and sale of merchandise, and the operation of stores and warehouse facilities. If these regulations were to change or were violated by our management, employees, vendors, buying agents, or trading companies, the costs of certain goods could increase, or we could experience delays in shipments of our goods, be subject to fines or penalties, or suffer reputational harm, which could reduce demand for our merchandise and hurt our business and results of operations.
In addition to increased regulatory compliance requirements, changes in laws could make ordinary conduct of our business more expensive or require us to change the way we do business. For example, changes in federal and state minimum wage laws could raise the wage requirements for certain of our employees. Other laws related to employee benefits and treatment of employees, including laws related to limitations on employee hours, supervisory status, leaves of absence, mandated health benefits, or overtime pay, could also negatively impact us, such as by increasing compensation and benefits costs for overtime and medical expenses.
Moreover, changes in product safety or other consumer protection laws or environmental laws could lead to increased costs to us for certain merchandise or additional costs associated with readying merchandise for sale. It is often difficult for us to plan and prepare for potential changes to applicable laws and future actions or payments related to such changes could be material to us.
We may be unable to protect our trademarks or other intellectual property rights and may be precluded from using trademarks in certain countries, which could harm our business.
We rely on certain trademark registrations and common law trademark rights to protect the distinctiveness of our brand. However, there can be no assurance that the actions we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks will be adequate to prevent imitation of our trademarks by others or to prevent others from claiming that sales of our products infringe, dilute, or otherwise violate third-party trademarks or other proprietary rights in order to block sales of our products.
The laws of certain foreign countries may not protect the use of unregistered trademarks to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. As a result, international protection of our brand image may be limited, and our right to use our trademarks outside the United States could be impaired. Other persons or entities may have rights to trademarks that contain portions of our marks or may have registered similar or competing marks for apparel and/or accessories in foreign countries. There may also be other prior registrations of trademarks identical or similar to our trademarks in other foreign countries. Accordingly, it may be possible for others to prevent the sale or manufacture of our branded goods in certain foreign countries. Our inability to register our trademarks or purchase or license the right to use the relevant trademarks or logos in these jurisdictions could limit our ability to penetrate new markets in jurisdictions outside the United States.
15
Litigation may be necessary to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights, to enforce these rights, or to defend against claims by third parties alleging that we infringe, dilute, or otherwise violate third-party trademark or other intellectual property rights. Any litigation or claims brought by or against us, whether with or without merit, or whether successful or not, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Any intellectual property litigation or claims against us could result in the loss or compromise of our intellectual property rights, could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses on unfavorable terms, if available at all, prevent us from manufacturing or selling certain products, and/or require us to redesign or re-label our products or rename our brand, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations could adversely affect our financial flexibility and our competitive position.
We have, and we will continue to have, a significant amount of indebtedness. As of February 2, 2013, we had $198.8 million of outstanding indebtedness (net of unamortized original issue discounts of $2.0 million). As of February 2, 2013, we had no borrowings outstanding and $195.8 million available under our $200.0 million secured Asset-Based Loan Credit Agreement (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). Our substantial level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay amounts due in respect of our indebtedness. We also have, and will continue to have, significant lease obligations. As of February 2, 2013, our minimum annual rental obligations under long-term lease arrangements for 2013 and 2014 were $202.4 million and $174.1 million, respectively. Our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations could have important consequences and significant effects on our business. For example, they could:
• | increase our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry, and competitive conditions; |
• | require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make payments on our indebtedness and leases, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, and other general corporate purposes; |
• | limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; |
• | restrict us from exploiting business opportunities; |
• | make it more difficult to satisfy our financial obligations, including payments on our indebtedness; |
• | place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt and lease obligations; and |
• | limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our business strategy, or other general corporate purposes. |
In addition, our existing credit agreements and the indenture governing the 8 3/4% Senior Notes ("Senior Notes") contain, and the agreements evidencing or governing other future indebtedness may contain, restrictive covenants that will limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our indebtedness.
Our indebtedness may restrict our current and future operations, which could adversely affect our ability to respond to changes in our business and to manage our operations.
Our existing credit agreement and the indenture governing the Senior Notes contain financial restrictions on us and our restricted subsidiaries, including restrictions on our or our restricted subsidiaries' ability to, among other things:
• | place liens on our or our restricted subsidiaries' assets; |
• | make investments other than permitted investments; |
• | incur additional indebtedness; |
• | prepay or redeem certain indebtedness; |
• | merge, consolidate or dissolve; |
• | sell assets; |
• | engage in transactions with affiliates; |
• | change the nature of our business; |
• | change our or our subsidiaries' fiscal year or organizational documents; and |
• | make restricted payments (including certain equity issuances). |
16
In addition, in the agreement governing our Revolving Credit Facility, we are required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00, if excess availability plus eligible cash collateral is less than 10% of the borrowing base for 15 consecutive days.
A failure by us or our subsidiaries to comply with the covenants or to maintain the required financial ratios contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness could result in an event of default under such indebtedness, which could adversely affect our ability to respond to changes in our business and manage our operations. Additionally, a default by us under one agreement covering our indebtedness may trigger cross-defaults under another agreement covering our indebtedness. Upon the occurrence of an event of default or cross-default under any of the agreements governing our indebtedness, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding to be due and payable and exercise other remedies as set forth in the agreements. If any of our indebtedness were to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that our assets would be sufficient to repay this indebtedness in full, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue to operate as a going concern. See the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for further information relating to our indebtedness.
Our results may be adversely affected by fluctuations in energy costs.
Energy costs have fluctuated dramatically in the past. These fluctuations may result in an increase in our transportation costs for distribution, utility costs for our retail stores, and costs to purchase product from our manufacturers. A rise in energy costs could adversely affect consumer spending and demand for our products and increase our operating costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in taxation requirements or the results of tax audits could adversely affect our financial results.
In connection with the Reorganization, we elected to be treated as a corporation under Subchapter C of Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), effective May 2, 2010, which subjects us to additional taxes and risks, including tax on our income. In addition, we may be subject to periodic audits by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. These audits may challenge certain of our tax positions, such as the timing and amount of deductions and allocations of taxable income to the various jurisdictions. These additional taxes and the results of any tax audits could adversely affect our financial results.
In addition, we are subject to income tax in numerous jurisdictions, and in the future as a result of our expansion we may be subject to income tax in additional jurisdictions, including international and domestic locations. Our products are subject to import and excise duties and/or sales or value-added taxes in many jurisdictions. Fluctuations in tax rates and duties could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
We may recognize impairment on long-lived assets.
Our long-lived assets, primarily stores and intangible assets, are subject to periodic testing for impairment. Store assets are reviewed using factors including, but not limited to, our future operating plans and projected future cash flows. Failure to achieve our future operating plans or generate sufficient levels of cash flow at our stores could result in impairment charges on long-lived assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Antitakeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that our stockholders might consider favorable.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:
• | establish a classified Board of Directors so that not all members of our Board of Directors are elected at one time; |
• | authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established, and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock; |
• | prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and |
• | establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings. |
Our certificate of incorporation also contains a provision that provides us with protections similar to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporate Law, that will prevent us from engaging in a business combination with a person who acquires at least 15% of our common stock for a period of 3 years from the date such person acquired such common stock, unless Board of Directors or stockholder approval is obtained prior to the acquisition. These antitakeover provisions and other provisions under
17
Delaware law could discourage, delay, or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.
Our ability to pay dividends and repurchase shares is subject to restrictions in our existing credit arrangements, results of operations, and capital requirements.
Any determination to pay dividends or repurchase additional shares in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, our financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law, and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant. Our ability to pay dividends on or repurchase our common stock is limited by agreements governing our indebtedness and may be further restricted by the terms of any of our future debt or preferred securities. Additionally, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is limited by restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions to us, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Home Office, Distribution Center, and Design Studio
The lease for our executive office space in Columbus, Ohio is scheduled to terminate April 30, 2016, but may be extended by us for an additional five years through April 2021. The lease for our design offices in New York City expires in July 2026.
The lease for our distribution facility is scheduled to terminate in April 2021, but may be terminated by either party upon 36 months prior notice provided that the lease term may not end prior to April 2017 or between the months of October and February.
Stores
All of our 625 stores are leased from third parties. See "Item 1. Business - Our Stores" for further information on the location of our stores.
We may from time to time lease new facilities or vacate existing facilities as our operations require, including in connection with opening new stores.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Information relating to legal proceedings is set forth in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
18
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Our common stock began trading on the NYSE on May 13, 2010 under the symbol "EXPR". Prior to that date, there was no public market for our common stock. As of March 21, 2013, there were approximately 50 holders of record of our common stock. The number of holders of record is based upon the actual number of holders registered at such date and does not include holders of shares in “street names” or persons, partnerships, associates, corporations, or other entities identified in security position listings maintained by depositories.
The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock reported on the NYSE for 2012 and 2011.
Market Price | |||||||
High | Low | ||||||
2012 | |||||||
Fourth quarter | $ | 18.81 | $ | 10.47 | |||
Third quarter | $ | 17.45 | $ | 10.93 | |||
Second quarter | $ | 24.39 | $ | 16.01 | |||
First quarter | $ | 26.27 | $ | 21.49 | |||
Market Price | |||||||
High | Low | ||||||
2011 | |||||||
Fourth quarter | $ | 23.52 | $ | 18.45 | |||
Third quarter | $ | 23.67 | $ | 16.12 | |||
Second quarter | $ | 24.02 | $ | 18.93 | |||
First quarter | $ | 21.97 | $ | 16.83 | |||
Dividends
We did not pay any dividends in 2012 or 2011. Our ability to pay dividends is restricted by the terms of the agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness. For more information about these restrictions, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Existing Credit Facilities". Any future determination to pay dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our results of operations, restrictions contained in current or future financing arrangements, and other factors as deemed relevant.
Share Repurchases
The following table provides information regarding the purchase of shares of our common stock made by or on behalf of us or any "affiliated purchaser" as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act of 1934, during each month of the quarterly period ended February 2, 2013:
19
Month | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs (2) | |||||||||
October 28, 2012 - November 24, 2012 | 496 | $ | 11.61 | — | 35,038 | ||||||||
November 25, 2012 - December 29, 2012 | 82 | $ | 14.84 | — | 35,038 | ||||||||
December 30, 2012 - February 2, 2013 | — | — | — | 35,038 | |||||||||
Total | 578 | — | |||||||||||
(1) Represents shares of restricted stock purchased in connection with employee tax withholding obligations under the Express, Inc. 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended, the "2010 Plan").
(2) On May 24, 2012, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of our common stock (the "Repurchase Program"), which may be made from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions. The Repurchase Program may be suspended, modified, or discontinued at any time, and we have no obligation to repurchase any amount of its common stock under the program.
During 2012, we repurchased approximately 4.0 million shares of our common stock in the open market at an aggregate purchase price of $65.0 million, excluding broker commissions of approximately $0.1 million.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the changes in the cumulative total return to stockholders of our common stock with that of the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Apparel Retailers Index for the same period. The comparison of the cumulative total returns for each investment assumes that $100 was invested in our common stock and the respective indexes on May 13, 2010, which was the first day our stock was traded on the NYSE, and includes reinvestment of all dividends. The plotted points are based on the closing price on the last trading day of each quarter.
COMPARISON OF THE
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
among Express, Inc., S&P 500 Index
and Dow Jones U.S. Apparel Retailers Index
20
5/13/10 | 1/29/11 | 1/28/12 | 2/2/13 | |||||||||
Express, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | $ | 105.91 | $ | 134.53 | $ | 113.80 | ||||
S&P 500 Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 110.27 | $ | 113.73 | $ | 130.73 | ||||
Dow Jones U.S. Apparel Retailers Index | $ | 100.00 | $ | 103.16 | $ | 121.22 | $ | 149.61 | ||||
The Performance Graph in this Item 5 is not deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Exchange Act of 1934 or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934 and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such a filing.
21
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following tables set forth our selected historical consolidated financial and operating data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The selected historical consolidated financial and operating data as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 and for the years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011 are derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, and the selected operating data for the periods ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 are derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which are not included herein.
The selected historical consolidated data presented below should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
22
Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
2012* | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
(dollars in thousands, excluding net sales per gross square foot and per share data) | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 2,148,069 | $ | 2,073,355 | $ | 1,905,814 | $ | 1,721,066 | $ | 1,737,010 | |||||
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs | 1,405,430 | 1,318,894 | 1,227,490 | 1,175,088 | 1,280,018 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 742,639 | 754,461 | 678,324 | 545,978 | 456,992 | ||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 491,599 | 483,823 | 461,073 | 409,198 | 447,071 | ||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | (523 | ) | (308 | ) | 18,000 | 9,943 | 6,007 | ||||||||
Operating income | 251,563 | 270,946 | 199,251 | 126,837 | 3,914 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 19,555 | 35,804 | 59,493 | 53,222 | 36,531 | ||||||||||
Interest income | (3 | ) | (12 | ) | (16 | ) | (484 | ) | (3,527 | ) | |||||
Other (income) expense, net | 40 | (411 | ) | (1,968 | ) | (2,444 | ) | (300 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 231,971 | 235,565 | 141,742 | 76,543 | (28,790 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax expense (1) | 92,704 | 94,868 | 14,354 | 1,236 | 246 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 139,267 | $ | 140,697 | $ | 127,388 | $ | 75,307 | $ | (29,036 | ) | ||||
Dividends declared per share | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.56 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Earnings per share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.49 | $ | 1.01 | $ | (0.40 | ) | ||||
Diluted | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1.48 | $ | 1.00 | $ | (0.40 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: (2) | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 86,852 | 88,596 | 85,369 | 74,566 | 72,516 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 87,206 | 88,896 | 86,050 | 75,604 | 72,516 | ||||||||||
Other Financial and Operating Data: | |||||||||||||||
Comparable sales change (3) | — | % | 6 | % | 10 | % | (4 | )% | (3 | )% | |||||
Comparable sales change (excluding e-commerce sales) (3) | (3 | )% | 3 | % | 7 | % | (6 | )% | (3 | )% | |||||
Net sales per gross square foot (4) | $ | 349 | $ | 355 | $ | 346 | $ | 321 | $ | 337 | |||||
Total gross square feet (in thousands) (average) | 5,307 | 5,196 | 5,029 | 5,033 | 5,060 | ||||||||||
Number of stores (at year end) | 625 | 609 | 591 | 573 | 581 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 99,674 | $ | 77,176 | $ | 54,843 | $ | 26,853 | $ | 50,551 | |||||
Balance Sheet Data (at period end): | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 256,297 | $ | 152,362 | $ | 187,762 | $ | 234,404 | $ | 176,115 | |||||
Working capital (excluding cash and cash equivalents )(5) | (53,211 | ) | (31,536 | ) | (56,054 | ) | (65,794 | ) | (28,317 | ) | |||||
Total assets | 1,019,199 | 866,320 | 862,749 | 869,554 | 860,413 | ||||||||||
Total debt (including current portion) | 198,843 | 198,539 | 367,407 | 416,763 | 498,478 | ||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | $ | 371,162 | $ | 281,147 | $ | 130,162 | $ | 141,453 | $ | 97,099 | |||||
* 2012 represents a fifty-three week year. | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Prior to the Reorganization, we were treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, and therefore had not been subject to federal and state income tax, with the exception of a limited number of state and local jurisdictions. In connection with the Reorganization, we became taxable as a corporation, effective May 2, 2010, and recorded a $31.8 million tax benefit related to this conversion. |
(2) | On May 12, 2010, in connection with the IPO, we converted from a Delaware limited liability company into a Delaware corporation and changed our name to Express, Inc. See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. In connection with this conversion, all of our equity interests, which consisted of Class L, Class A, and Class C units, were converted into shares of our common stock at a ratio of 0.702, 0.649, and 0.442, respectively. All share and per share information in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes has been retrospectively recast to reflect this conversion. |
(3) | Comparable sales have been calculated based upon stores that were open at least thirteen full months as of the end of the reporting period. For 2012, comparable sales were calculated based upon the fifty-three week period ended February 2, 2013 compared to the fifty-three week period ended February 4, 2012. For 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, comparable sales include e-commerce merchandise sales. |
(4) | Net sales per gross square foot is calculated by dividing net sales for the applicable period by the average gross square footage during such period. For the purpose of calculating net sales per gross square foot, e-commerce sales and other revenues are excluded from net sales. |
(5) | Working capital is defined as current assets, less cash and cash equivalents, less current liabilities, excluding the current portion of long-term debt. |
23
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting the consolidated operating results, financial condition, liquidity, and cash flows of our company as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” All references herein to "2012", "2011", and "2010" refer to the 53-week period ended February 2, 2013, and the fifty-two week periods ended January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, respectively. Comparable sales for 2012 were calculated based upon the fifty-three week period ended February 2, 2013 compared to the fifty-three week period ended February 4, 2012.
Overview
Express is a specialty apparel and accessories retailer offering both women's and men's merchandise. We have over 30 years of experience offering a distinct combination of style and quality at an attractive value, targeting women and men between 20 and 30 years old. We offer our customers an assortment of fashionable apparel and accessories to address fashion needs across multiple wearing occasions, including work, casual, jeanswear, and going-out occasions.
The results of 2012 were mixed, combining progress against 3 of our 4 growth pillars with financial results that did not meet our expectations:
• | New Store Growth: added 16 new stores, net of closures, and signed leases for 2 flagship locations to be opened in 2013 and 2014; |
• | E-commerce Growth: increased sales by 32% over 2011, representing 13% of total net sales; |
• | International Expansion: opened first 4 franchise stores in Latin America as well as 4 additional franchise stores in the Middle East. |
Progress against our fourth growth pillar, improve existing store performance, was not achieved, with comparable sales, excluding e-commerce sales, down low single digits compared to 2011, driven by decreased traffic in our stores and a heightened promotional environment.
In 2012, net sales increased $74.7 million over 2011, including $27.0 million associated with the fifty-third week, representing a 4% increase. However, operating income declined to $251.6 million versus 2011, a 7% decrease, and net income decreased by $1.4 million to $139.3 million. Earnings per diluted share were $1.60, with the fifty-third week contributing approximately $0.04 of that amount. This compares to $1.58 per diluted share in 2011, which included approximately $0.08 of non-core operating costs.
Comparable sales for 2012 were flat compared to an increase of 6% in 2011. First quarter 2012 financial performance was strong, with the business generating comparable sales of 4%; however, it was followed by comparable sales of +1%, -5%, and +1.5% in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2012, respectively. In response to poor performance during the second and third quarters of 2012, the Company introduced a number of initiatives, including: introducing entry price point fashion items in key categories, communicating clearer pricing and promotions, and taking steps to improve the execution of our go-to-market strategy, amongst other things. Execution against these initiatives generated a significant improvement in comparable sales later in the year, as they improved from -5% to +1.5% between the third and fourth quarters of 2012.
Improve Productivity of Our Retail Stores
Net sales per average gross square foot decreased from $355 for the year ended January 28, 2012 to $349 for the year ended February 2, 2013, primarily driven by decreased traffic in our stores. Net sales per average gross square foot is determined by dividing net sales (excluding e-commerce sales, shipping and handling revenue related to e-commerce, gift card breakage, and franchise revenue) for the period by average gross square feet during the period. Additionally, we continued to see increased promotional activity in order to sell through inventory, primarily in women's, which contributed to the lower margin. Despite a decrease in traffic, our men's business remained solid and performed well, achieving balanced growth across categories.
24
Expand Our Store Base
In 2012, we opened 28 new company-operated stores, including 5 stores in Canada, and closed 12 stores in the United States. As of February 2, 2013, we operated 625 locations. In 2013, we expect to open approximately 16 additional stores, including 4 in Canada, and close 9 stores in the United States. The planned store openings include one company-owned flagship store in the United States, with another planned to open in spring 2014. These flagships will result in approximately $8.0 million in incremental pre-opening rent expense in 2013. Our projected store closures are related to dual gender store conversions for the few locations where we still operate both women's and men's stand-alone stores, shopping center redevelopments, and exiting underperforming stores as their respective leases expire.
Expand Our e-Commerce Platform
In 2012, our e-commerce sales increased 32% over 2011, which was on top of a 39% increase over 2010. The growth in e-commerce sales in 2012 was driven by increased sales of both men's and women's merchandise. A significant contributor to our increase in e-commerce sales in 2012 was the continued movement towards more seamless multi-channel capabilities, including increasing our online assortment and improving online ordering capabilities in our stores. We also believe that our website, digital, mobile, and social media marketing initiatives continue to be drivers of our increase in e-commerce sales. In 2013, we plan to continue our investment in these initiatives, and, in addition, we brought our website hosting and administration in-house after Holiday 2012, providing us additional flexibility and control over the look, content, and feel of our website. We believe this affords us the opportunity to continue to grow e-commerce sales, although not necessarily at the same rate as in the past given the progress we have already made in this area. E-commerce sales represented 13% of our total net sales in 2012, and we continue to expect to see this channel grow to be at least 15% of net sales.
Expand Internationally
In 2012, we made steady progress on our international expansion strategy with additional franchise store openings in the Middle East and the first franchise store openings in Latin America, pursuant to a new franchise agreement covering Mexico and another franchise agreement covering multiple other Latin American countries. At year end, we were earning revenue from 15 franchise locations, a net increase of 8 stores from the fourth quarter of 2011. In 2013, we plan to sign deals with 2 additional franchise partners and open between 13 and 16 franchise store locations.
How We Assess the Performance of Our Business
In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures. These key measures include net sales, comparable sales and other individual store performance factors, gross profit, and selling, general, and administrative expenses. We also review other metrics such as EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.
Net Sales. Net sales reflects revenues from the sale of our merchandise, less returns and discounts, as well as shipping and handling revenue related to e-commerce, gift card breakage, and revenue earned from our franchise agreements.
Comparable Sales and Other Individual Store Performance Factors. Comparable sales are calculated based upon stores that were open at least thirteen full months as of the end of the reporting period. In 2012, comparable sales were calculated based upon the fifty-three week period ended February 2, 2013 compared to the fifty-three week period ended February 4, 2012. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we began including e-commerce sales in our comparable sales results and adjusted comparable sales figures retroactively back to the second quarter of 2009. A store is not considered a part of the comparable sales base if the square footage of the store changed by more than 20% due to remodel or relocation activities. As we continue to increase our store count, we expect that non-comparable sales will begin to contribute more to our total net sales than they currently do. We also review sales per gross square foot, average unit retail price, units per transaction, dollars per transaction, traffic, and conversion, among other things, to evaluate the performance of individual stores and on a company-wide basis.
Gross Profit. Gross profit is equal to net sales minus cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs. Gross margin measures gross profit as a percentage of net sales. Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs includes the direct cost of purchased merchandise, inventory shrinkage, inventory adjustments, inbound freight to our distribution center, outbound freight to get merchandise from our distribution center to stores, merchandising, design, planning and allocation and manufacturing/production costs, occupancy costs related to store operations (such as rent and common area maintenance, utilities, and depreciation on assets), and all logistics costs associated with our e-commerce business.
Our cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs increase in higher volume quarters because the direct cost of purchased merchandise is tied to sales. Buying and occupancy costs are largely fixed and do not necessarily increase as volume increases. Changes in the mix of our products, such as changes in the proportion of accessories, which are higher margin, may also impact our overall cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs. We review our inventory levels on an on-going basis in order to identify slow-moving merchandise and generally use markdowns to clear such merchandise. The timing and level of
25
markdowns are driven primarily by seasonality and customer acceptance of our merchandise. We use third-party vendors and company-owned outlet stores to dispose of marked-out-of-stock merchandise. The primary drivers of the costs of individual goods are raw materials, labor in the countries where our merchandise is sourced, and logistics costs associated with transporting our merchandise.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses include all operating costs not included in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs, with the exception of costs such as advisory fees incurred prior to our IPO, proceeds received from insurance claims, and gain/loss on disposal of assets, which are included in other operating expense, net. These costs include payroll and other expenses related to operations at our corporate home office, store expenses other than occupancy, and marketing expenses, which primarily include production, mailing, and print advertising costs. With the exception of store payroll and marketing, these expenses generally do not vary proportionally with net sales. As a result, selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales is usually higher in lower volume quarters and lower in higher volume quarters.
Other Operating Expense, Net. Other operating expense, net includes advisory fees incurred prior to our IPO, excess proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims, and gain/loss on disposal of assets.
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth the various line items in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income as a percentage of net sales for the last three years.
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net sales | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs | 65 | % | 64 | % | 64 | % | ||
Gross profit | 35 | % | 36 | % | 36 | % | ||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 23 | % | 23 | % | 24 | % | ||
Other operating (income) expense, net | — | % | — | % | 1 | % | ||
Operating income | 12 | % | 13 | % | 10 | % | ||
Interest expense | 1 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | ||
Interest income | — | % | — | % | — | % | ||
Other (expense) income, net | — | % | — | % | — | % | ||
Income before income taxes | 11 | % | 11 | % | 7 | % | ||
Income tax expense | 4 | % | 5 | % | 1 | % | ||
Net income | 6 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | ||
Fiscal Year Comparisons
Net Sales
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Net sales (in thousands) | $ | 2,148,069 | $ | 2,073,355 | $ | 1,905,814 | |||||
Comparable sales percentage change | — | % | 6 | % | 10 | % | |||||
Comparable sales percentage change (excluding e-commerce sales) | (3 | )% | 3 | % | 7 | % | |||||
Gross square footage at end of period (in thousands) | 5,423 | 5,267 | 5,128 | ||||||||
Number of: | |||||||||||
Stores open at beginning of period | 609 | 591 | 573 | ||||||||
New stores | 28 | 27 | 23 | ||||||||
Closed stores | (12 | ) | (9 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||
Stores open at end of period | 625 | 609 | 591 | ||||||||
26
Net sales increased by approximately $74.7 million, or 4%, and included approximately $27.0 million related to the fifty-third week in 2012. Comparable sales were flat for 2012 compared to 2011. For 2012, comparable sales were calculated based upon the fifty-three week period ended February 2, 2013 compared to the fifty-three week period ended February 4, 2012. The flat comparable sales resulted from decreases in both transactions and average dollar sales, offset by growth in e-commerce sales. We attribute the decrease in transactions to lower traffic in our stores and a lesser acceptance of product in certain women's categories during the second and third quarters. Non-comparable sales increased $35.8 million, equally driven by new store openings and remodels.
Net sales increased $167.5 million from $1.9 billion in 2010 to $2.1 billion in 2011, a 9% increase. Comparable sales increased by $109.0 million, or 6%, in 2011 compared to 2010. The comparable sales growth was driven by growth in average dollar sales during the period as well as the continued growth in e-commerce sales. Non-comparable sales increased $58.5 million primarily driven by new store openings. Other revenue was $21.5 million in 2011, an increase of $4.0 million, compared to other revenue of $17.5 million in 2010, primarily as a result of more shipping and handling revenue related to e-commerce merchandise sales growth.
Gross Profit
The following table shows cost of sales and gross profit in dollars for the stated periods:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs | $ | 1,405,430 | $ | 1,318,894 | $ | 1,227,490 | |||||
Gross profit | $ | 742,639 | $ | 754,461 | $ | 678,324 | |||||
The 180 basis point decrease in gross margin, or gross profit as a percentage of net sales, in 2012 compared to 2011 was comprised of a 140 basis point deterioration in merchandise margin and a 40 basis point increase in buying and occupancy costs. The decrease in merchandise margin was primarily driven by higher product costs and increased promotional activity in the latter part of the second quarter and into the fall season. The increase in buying and occupancy costs is primarily driven by increased rent, including the impact of $7.8 million of pre-opening rent expense for the 2 flagship stores under construction.
From 2010 to 2011, we had an 80 basis point improvement in gross margin, or gross profit as a percentage of net sales. The improvement was comprised of 40 basis points of merchandise margin expansion and 40 basis points of buying and occupancy leverage. The merchandise margin expansion was primarily driven by average unit retail increases in certain categories, partially offset by average unit cost increases and higher cancellation charges resulting from our strategic positioning of fabric ahead of anticipated cost increases, along with improvements in the execution of our go-to-market strategy.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
The following table shows selling, general, and administrative expenses in dollars for the stated periods:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | $ | 491,599 | $ | 483,823 | $ | 461,073 | |||||
The $7.8 million increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses in 2012 compared to 2011 was driven by a $4.7 million increase in information technology expenses to support international expansion and e-commerce growth, a $2.8 million increase in payroll primarily related to additional headcount at our home office to support our international expansion and e-commerce growth pillars, merit increases, and increased stock compensation expense, and a $2.5 million increase in marketing expense, primarily related to e-commerce activities. These increases were partially offset by a $2.3 million decrease in professional fees due to the secondary offerings in 2011 and hiring internal heads versus outsourcing labor needs in 2012.
The $22.8 million increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses in 2011 compared to 2010 was driven by a $21.9 million increase in payroll primarily from annual merit increases, increased share-based compensation expense, additional store payroll hours to support increased sales, and additional headcount at our home office to support e-commerce and information technology initiatives. Also contributing to the increase was an $11.1 million increase in marketing expense driven by our
27
continued investments in brand building initiatives, including television advertising and increased e-commerce and print advertising to heighten awareness and maximize the strength of our brand, as well as increased investment to support our entrance into Canada. These increases were partially offset by a $9.8 million decrease in professional fees, including $3.2 million of IPO costs incurred in 2010.
Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net
The following table shows other operating (income) expense, net in dollars for the stated periods:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Other operating expense (income), net | $ | (523 | ) | $ | (308 | ) | $ | 18,000 | |||
The increase in other operating (income) expense, net in 2012 compared to 2011 was insignificant. The $18.3 million decrease in other operating (income) expense, net in 2011 compared to 2010 was driven by the $10.0 million fee paid to Golden Gate and $3.3 million fee paid to L Brands to terminate the Advisory Agreement and the LLC Agreement, respectively, upon completion of the IPO on May 18, 2010 and $4.7 million of expense related to on-going advisory fees with Golden Gate and L Brands prior to the IPO.
Interest Expense
The following table shows interest expense in dollars for the stated periods:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | 19,555 | $ | 35,804 | $ | 59,493 | |||||
The $16.2 million decrease in interest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 resulted primarily from a $9.6 million loss on extinguishment related to the repurchases of $49.2 million of Senior Notes in the first and second quarters of 2011, the amendment of the $200 million Revolving Credit Facility in the second quarter of 2011, and the full prepayment of the Term Loan in the fourth quarter of 2011. The remaining reduction in expense relates to a lower debt balance in 2012 compared to 2011 due to the previously-mentioned repurchases and prepayment.
The $23.7 million decrease in interest expense in 2011 compared to 2010 resulted primarily from the $20.8 million loss on extinguishment of debt associated with the early repayment of the Topco Credit Facility in 2010, which, along with the repurchase of the Senior Notes in 2011, also led to $9.2 million in interest savings during 2011. These reductions were partially offset by the $9.6 million loss on extinguishments related to the repurchases of $49.2 million of Senior Notes, the amendment of the Revolving Credit Facility, and the prepayment of the Term Loan in 2011.
Income Tax Expense
The following table shows income tax expense in dollars for the stated periods:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 92,704 | $ | 94,868 | $ | 14,354 | |||||
The effective tax rate was 40.0% for 2012 compared to 40.3% for 2011. We anticipate our effective tax rate will be between 39.3% and 39.8% in 2013.
The effective tax rate for 2011 was 40.3% compared to 10.1% for 2010. The higher rate was primarily due to becoming subject to taxation as a corporation on May 2, 2010 in connection with our conversion to a corporation. We were previously treated as a partnership for tax purposes through May 1, 2010 and, therefore, generally were not subject to federal and state income taxes.
28
Adjusted Net Income
The following table presents Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share for the stated periods:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Adjusted Net Income | $ | 139,267 | * | $ | 147,126 | $ | 121,790 | ||||
Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share | $ | 1.60 | * | $ | 1.66 | $ | 1.42 | ||||
* These are GAAP numbers because no adjustments were made to net income or earnings per diluted shares for the fifty-three weeks ended February 2, 2013.
We supplement the reporting of our financial information determined under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") with certain non-GAAP financial measures: adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share. We believe that these non-GAAP measures provide meaningful information to assist the readers of our financial information in understanding our financial results and assessing our prospects for future performance. Management believes adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share are important indicators of our operations because they exclude items that may not be indicative of, or are unrelated to, our core operating results, and provide a better baseline for analyzing trends in our underlying business. Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. These adjusted financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for reported net income and reported earnings per diluted share. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results and the following reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of our business. We strongly encourage investors and stockholders to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.
The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share, with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, net income and earnings per diluted share. No adjustments were made to net income or earnings per diluted share for the fifty-three weeks ended February 2, 2013, and, therefore, no tabular reconciliation has been included for the respective period.
2011 | ||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | Net Income | Earnings per Diluted Share | Weighted Average Diluted Shares Outstanding | |||||||
Reported GAAP Measure | $ | 140,697 | $ | 1.58 | 88,896 | |||||
Transaction Costs (a)* | 614 | 0.01 | ||||||||
Interest Expense (b)* | 5,815 | 0.07 | ||||||||
Adjusted Non-GAAP Measure | $ | 147,126 | $ | 1.66 | ||||||
(a) | Includes transaction costs related to the secondary offerings completed in April 2011 and December 2011. |
(b) | Includes premium paid and accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount related to the repurchases of $49.2 million of Senior Notes and the amendment of the $200 million Revolving Credit Facility, and the full prepayment of the $125.0 million Term Loan. |
* Items were tax affected at our statutory rate of approximately 39% for 2011.
29
2010 | ||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | Net Income | Earnings per Diluted Share | Weighted Average Diluted Shares Outstanding | |||||||
Reported GAAP Measure | $ | 127,388 | $ | 1.48 | 86,050 | |||||
Transaction Costs (a)* | 2,718 | 0.03 | ||||||||
Advisory/LLC Fees (b) * | 8,121 | 0.10 | ||||||||
Interest Expense (c) * | 15,370 | 0.18 | ||||||||
Non-Cash Tax Benefit (d) | (31,807 | ) | (0.37 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted Non-GAAP Measure | $ | 121,790 | $ | 1.42 | ||||||
(a) | Includes transaction costs related to the Senior Notes offering, the IPO, and the secondary offering completed in December 2010. |
(b) | Includes one-time fees paid to Golden Gate and L Brands for terminating advisory arrangements with them. |
(c) | Includes prepayment penalty and accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount related to the early repayment of the Topco Credit Facility. |
(d)Represents one-time, non-cash tax benefit in connection with the conversion to a corporation.
* Items were tax affected at approximately 1.2% for the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2010 and at our statutory rate of approximately 39.1% for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our business relies on cash flows from operations as our primary source of liquidity. We do, however, have access to additional liquidity, if needed, through borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Our primary cash needs are for merchandise inventories, payroll, store rent, and capital expenditures, primarily associated with opening new stores, remodeling existing stores, and information technology projects. The most significant components of our working capital are merchandise inventories, accounts payable, and other accrued expenses. Our liquidity position benefits from the fact that we generally collect cash from sales to customers the same day or, in the case of credit or debit card transactions, within 3 to 5 days of the related sale, and have up to 75 days to pay certain merchandise vendors and 45 days to pay the majority of our non-merchandise vendors.
Our cash position is seasonal as a result of building up inventory for the next selling season and, as a result, our cash flows from operations during the spring are usually lower when compared to the rest of the year. Our cash balances generally increase during the summer selling season and then increase further during the fall and holiday seasons. We believe that cash generated from operations and the availability of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures, and scheduled interest payments for at least the next 12 months.
Cash Flow Analysis
A summary of cash provided by or used in operating, investing and financing activities are shown in the following table:
Year Ended | |||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Provided by operating activities | $ | 269,364 | $ | 212,609 | $ | 219,958 | |||||
Used in investing activities | (99,884 | ) | (77,236 | ) | (54,843 | ) | |||||
Used in financing activities | (65,551 | ) | (170,775 | ) | (211,757 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 103,935 | (35,400 | ) | (46,642 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 256,297 | $ | 152,362 | $ | 187,762 | |||||
30
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
The majority of our operating cash inflows are derived from sales. Our operating cash outflows generally consist of payments to merchandise vendors, employees for wages, salaries, and other employee benefits, and landlords for rent. Operating cash outflows also include payments for income taxes and interest on long-term debt.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $269.4 million in 2012 compared to $212.6 million in 2011, an increase of $56.8 million. Relative to the fifty-three weeks ended February 2, 2013, the increase in cash provided by operations primarily related to the following:
• | Items included in net income provided $227.0 million of cash during 2012 compared to $224.0 million during 2011. The increase in the current year was primarily driven by lower interest expense, partially offset by the decreased performance of the business as discussed in "Overview" and "Results of Operations". |
• | In addition to the increase in cash provided by items included in net income discussed above, there was $42.4 million of cash provided from working capital decreases during 2012 compared to $11.3 million of cash used in 2011. Working capital is subject to cyclical operating needs, the timing of receivable collections and payable and expense payments, and the seasonal fluctuations in our operations. The $53.7 million change primarily relates to the timing of merchandise and real estate payments in 2012 versus 2011 and lower cash outflows for purchases of inventory due to the timing of receipts in 2012 versus 2011. These were partially offset by incentive compensation paid in 2012 for 2011 results and reduced incentive compensation accrued in 2012 given softer business results. |
Net cash provided by operating activities was $212.6 million in 2011 compared to $220.0 million in 2010, a decrease of $7.4 million. Relative to the fifty-two weeks ended January 28, 2012, the decrease in cash provided by operations primarily related to the following:
• | Items included in net income provided $224.0 million of cash during 2011 compared to $191.5 million during 2010. The increase was primarily driven by improved operating results and lower interest expense. As discussed in “Results of Operations”, this was primarily the result of higher average dollar sales and the execution of our go-to-market strategy, as well as continued debt reduction. These items were offset by higher taxes in the current year as a result of improved operating results and the change in our tax status during the second quarter of 2010. |
• | The increase in cash provided by items included in net income discussed above was more than offset by $11.3 million of cash used for working capital increases during 2011 compared to $28.5 million of cash provided in 2010. Working capital is subject to cyclical operating needs, the timing of receivable collections and payable and expense payments, and the seasonal fluctuations in our operations. The working capital increase in 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in inventories and income tax liability. The increase in inventories primarily reflects funding for continued e-commerce growth, new stores, and new category growth, while the increase in income tax liability was driven by our status as a corporation for all of 2011 versus only 9 months in 2010 and timing of tax payments. |
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures for new and remodeled store construction and fixtures, information technology, and home office and design studio renovations.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $99.9 million in 2012 compared to $77.2 million in 2011, a $22.7 million increase. This increase was primarily driven by capital expenditures, gross of landlord allowances, attributable to new store openings and remodels, totaling $76.0 million during 2012 compared to $60.7 million during 2011. The remaining increase related primarily to investments in technology to support our international expansion and e-commerce growth.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $22.4 million to $77.2 million in 2011 compared to $54.8 million in 2010. This increase was primarily driven by capital expenditures, gross of landlord allowances, attributable to new store openings, remodels, and store fixtures, totaling $60.7 million in 2011 compared to $38.9 million in 2010.
In 2013, we plan to open approximately 16 new stores, including 4 in Canada. We expect capital expenditures for 2013 to be approximately $110.0 million to $115.0 million, primarily driven by these new store openings, including the 2 flagship locations, which require additional expenditures over that of a typical new store opening. These capital expenditures do not include the impact of landlord allowances, which are expected to be approximately $10.0 to $15.0 million for 2013.
31
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $65.6 million during 2012 as compared to $170.8 million in 2011, a decrease of $105.2 million. Cash used for financing activities was primarily related to the repurchase of $65.1 million of our common stock, including broker commissions, in 2012 as part of the Repurchase Program. The cash used in financing activities in 2011 was primarily related to the $119.7 million full prepayment of the Term Loan and repurchases of $49.2 million of Senior Notes.
Credit Facilities
The following provides an overview of the current status of our long term debt arrangements. Refer to Note 9 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our long-term debt arrangements.
Revolving Credit Facility
On July 29, 2011, Express Holding, LLC and its domestic subsidiaries entered into an amended and restated $200.0 million secured asset-based loan credit agreement. The Revolving Credit Facility amended, restated, and extended the existing $200.0 million asset-based revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to expire on July 6, 2012. The amended Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on July 29, 2016 and allows for up to $30.0 million of swing line advances and up to $45.0 million to be available in the form of letters of credit.
As of February 2, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, and we had $195.8 million of availability. We were not subject to the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant in the Revolving Credit Facility at February 2, 2013 because excess availability plus eligible cash collateral exceeded 10% of the borrowing base.
Senior Notes
On March 5, 2010, Express, LLC and Express Finance Corp., as co-issuers, issued $250.0 million of 8 3/4% Senior Notes due 2018 at an offering price of 98.6% of the face value. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year. Unamortized debt issuance costs outstanding related to the Senior Notes as of February 2, 2013 were $6.1 million.
In the first quarter of 2011, $25.0 million of Senior Notes were repurchased on the open market at a price of 108.75% of the principal amount. In the second quarter of 2011, $24.2 million of Senior Notes were repurchased on the open market at an average price of 109.21% of the principal amount.
Contractual Obligations
We enter into long-term contractual obligations and commitments in the normal course of business, primarily debt obligations and non-cancelable operating leases. As of February 2, 2013, our contractual cash obligations over the next several periods are set forth in the following table.
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations: | Total | <1 Year | 2-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Thereafter | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Existing Debt Facilities(1) | $ | 200,850 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 200,850 | |||||
Interest Costs(2) | 96,657 | 17,574 | 35,148 | 35,148 | 8,787 | ||||||||||
Other Long-Term Obligations(3) | 32,017 | 10,602 | 19,053 | 2,362 | — | ||||||||||
Operating Leases(4) | 1,346,182 | 202,445 | 321,280 | 239,443 | 583,014 | ||||||||||
Purchase Obligations(5) | 262,876 | 262,876 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,938,582 | $ | 493,497 | $ | 375,481 | $ | 276,953 | $ | 792,651 | |||||
(1) | As of February 2, 2013, we had the following amounts outstanding under our existing debt arrangements: no amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and $200.8 million in Senior Notes outstanding. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on July 29, 2016 and the Senior Notes are due in March 2018. Refer to Note 9 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our existing debt arrangements. |
(2) | Includes interest under existing debt facilities. |
(3) | Other long-term obligations consist of employment related agreements and obligations under other long-term agreements. |
(4) | We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business. Most lease arrangements provide us with the option to renew the leases at defined terms. The future operating lease obligations would change if we were to exercise these |
32
options, or if we were to enter into additional new operating leases. These amounts also include all contractual lease commitments related to our flagship locations, which we are considered the owner of for accounting purposes. Common area maintenance, real estate tax, and other customary charges included in our operating lease agreements are not included above. Estimated annual expense incurred for such charges is approximately $98.7 million.
(5) | Purchase obligations are made up of merchandise purchase orders and unreserved fabric commitments. |
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Management evaluates its accounting policies, estimates, and judgments on an on-going basis. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Management evaluated the development and selection of its critical accounting policies and estimates and believes that the following policies involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity and are most significant to reporting its results of operations and financial position and are, therefore, discussed as critical. The following critical accounting policies reflect the significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. More information on all of our significant accounting policies can be found in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Description of Policy | Judgments and Uncertainties | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
Gift Card Breakage | ||
We sell gift cards in our retail stores and through our e-commerce website and third parties, which do not expire or lose value over periods of inactivity. We account for gift cards by recognizing a liability at the time a gift card is sold. We recognize income from gift cards when they are redeemed by the customer. In addition, income on unredeemed gift cards is recognized proportionally using a time based attribution method from issuance of the gift card to the time it is can be determined that the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed is remote. The gift card breakage rate is based on historical redemption patterns. | Our accounting methodology for calculating gift card breakage contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions that future gift card redemptions will follow the pattern of previous redemptions. Our estimates for these items are based primarily on historical transaction experience. | We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to determine gift card breakage over the past 3 years. We have no reason to believe that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to measure gift card breakage. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 100 basis point change in our gift card breakage rate as of February 2, 2013 would have affected pre-tax income by approximately $0.6 million. |
33
Description of Policy | Judgments and Uncertainties | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
Inventories | ||
Inventories are principally valued at the lower of cost or market on a weighted-average cost basis. We record a lower of cost or market reserve for our inventories if the cost of specific inventory items on hand exceeds the amount we expect to realize from the ultimate sale or disposal of the inventory. We also record an inventory shrinkage reserve calculated as a percentage of cost of sales for estimated merchandise losses for the period between the last physical inventory count and the balance sheet date. These estimates are based on historical results and can be affected by changes in merchandise mix and/or changes in shrinkage trends. | Our accounting methodology for determining the lower of cost or market reserve contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and estimates that are based on factors such as merchandise seasonality, historical trends, and estimated inventory levels, including sell-through of remaining units. Our accounting methodology for estimating the inventory shrinkage reserve contains uncertainty as it requires management to make the assumption that future shrink results will follow the pattern of previous physical inventory losses. | We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to determine the lower of cost or market or shrinkage reserve over the past 3 years. We have no reason to believe that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to measure the lower of cost or market or shrinkage reserve. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. A 10% increase or decrease in the lower of cost or market adjustment would impact the inventory balance and pre-tax income by $0.8 million as of and for the year ended February 2, 2013. A 10% increase or decrease in the inventory shrink reserve balance would impact the reserve balance and pre-tax income by $1.7 million as of and for the year ended February 2, 2013. |
Intangible Assets | ||
Intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily trade names, are reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and may be reviewed more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. The impairment review is performed by assessing qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. | Our consideration of indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment requires judgments surrounding future operating performance, economic conditions, and business plans, among other factors. | There are inherent uncertanties related to our qualitative assessment and, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to impairment losses that could be material. |
Leasehold Improvements | ||
Leasehold improvements are reviewed for impairment if indicators of impairment are present. The impairment review is performed at the store level by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted cash flows derived from the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows of the asset are less than the carrying value of the respective asset, then the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value as determined using the discounted store cash flows, and a loss is recognized for the difference. | Our analysis of leasehold improvements for impairment requires judgment surrounding what the appropriate triggering events should be. This judgment can be affected by factors such as future store results, real estate demand, and economic conditions that can be difficult to predict. | We have not made any material changes in the triggering events used to evaluate our leasehold improvements for impairment over the past 3 years. We have no reason to believe that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use in this evaluation. However, if we become aware of additional triggering events or if triggering events that we are not currently using are added, there is potential that additional stores could be required to be tested for impairment and could be impaired. |
34
Description of Policy | Judgments and Uncertainties | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
Claims and Contingencies | ||
We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to legal, regulatory, and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. Our determination of the treatment of claims and contingencies in our Consolidated Financial Statements is based on management's view of the expected outcome of the applicable claim or contingency. Management may also use outside legal advice on matters related to litigation to assist in the estimating process. We accrue a liability if the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. We re-evaluate these assessments on a quarterly basis or as new material information becomes available to determine whether a liability should be established or if any existing liability should be adjusted. | Our liability for claims and contingencies contain uncertanties because the eventual outcome will result from future events. Additionally, the determination of current accruals requires estimates and judgments related to future changes in facts and circumstances, differing interpretations of the law, assessments of the amount of damages, and the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control. | We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our liability for claims and contingencies over the past 3 years. We have no reason to believe that there will be a material change in our accrual or the assumptions we use to establish the accrual for claims and contingencies. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or expectations of the eventual outcomes of cases, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material and our cash flow could be materially impacted. |
Income Taxes | ||
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, the amount of taxes currently payable or refundable is accrued and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and the financial reporting basis of our assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect in the years when those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes from a change in tax rate is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date of the change. | Our accounting methodology for calculating our tax liabilities contains uncertainties because our judgments may change as a result of evaluation of new information not previously available. Our deferred tax asset and liability balances contain uncertainty because changes in tax laws and rates may differ from the estimates and judgments made by management. We may be subject to periodic audits by the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. These audits may challenge certain of our tax positions, such as the timing and amount of deductions and allocation of taxable income to the various jurisdictions. | We have no reason to believe there is a likelihood that there will be a material change in our tax related balances. However, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of our tax liabilities. We have no reason to believe that our results of operations will differ materially from our current expectations. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates, we may need to adjust the valuation allowance in the future. An increase or decrease in the valuation allowance would result in a respective increase or decrease in our effective tax rate in the period the increase occurs. To the extent that we prevail in matters for which unrecognized tax benefit liabilities have been established or are required to pay amounts in excess of recorded unrecognized tax benefit liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would require use of our cash and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. |
35
Description of Policy | Judgments and Uncertainties | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
Share-based Compensation | ||
Our share-based payments related to stock options are estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock option grants, which require us to estimate the expected term and the expected stock price volatility over the expected term. | Our accounting methodology for calculating share-based payments contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and judgments to determine the fair value of our awards. The primary assumptions used in the valuation of the stock options are the expected term of the option and the future volatility of our stock price. As we have limited history as a public company, we have elected to utilize the SEC's simplified method for calculation of our expected term, which takes a significant amount of judgment out of this assumption. Our volatility was estimated using comparable companies' volatility over a similar expected term, and, beginning with the second anniversary of the IPO in May 2012, we began using our own volatility as an additional input as well. | We have no reason to believe that the future volatility of our stock will be materially different from the estimate used in valuing our awards. A 10% increase in volatility would yield an approximate 8% increase in the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation for stock options. |
Related Party Transactions
See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our related party transactions.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Our Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at variable rates. See Note 9 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the calculation of the rates. We did not borrow any amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility during 2012. Borrowings under our Senior Notes bear interest at a fixed rate. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair value of such debt, but do not impact earnings or cash flow. Changes in interest rates are not expected to have a material impact on our future earnings or cash flows given our limited exposure to such changes.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
All of our purchases are denominated in US dollars, therefore we are not exposed to foreign currency exchange risk on these purchases. However, we currently operate 11 stores in Canada, with the functional currency of our Canadian operations being the Canadian dollar. Our Canadian operations have intercompany accounts with our U.S. subsidiaries that eliminate upon consolidation, but the transactions resulting in such accounts do expose us to foreign currency exchange risk. We do not utilize hedging instruments to mitigate foreign currency exchange risks. As of February 2, 2013, a hypothetical 10% change in the Canadian foreign exchange rate would have impacted the results of operations by approximately $1.7 million.
Impact of Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross profit and selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales if the selling prices of our products do not rise with these increased costs.
36
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Express, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Express, Inc. and its subsidiaries at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 2, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Columbus, Ohio
April 2, 2013
37
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 256,297 | $ | 152,362 | |||
Receivables, net | 11,024 | 9,027 | |||||
Inventories | 215,082 | 213,075 | |||||
Prepaid minimum rent | 25,166 | 23,461 | |||||
Other | 8,293 | 18,232 | |||||
Total current assets | 515,862 | 416,157 | |||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | 625,344 | 521,860 | |||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | (346,975 | ) | (294,554 | ) | |||
Property and equipment, net | 278,369 | 227,306 | |||||
TRADENAME/DOMAIN NAME | 197,719 | 197,509 | |||||
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS | 16,808 | 12,462 | |||||
OTHER ASSETS | 10,441 | 12,886 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 1,019,199 | $ | 866,320 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 176,125 | $ | 133,679 | |||
Deferred revenue | 27,851 | 27,684 | |||||
Accrued bonus | 336 | 14,689 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 108,464 | 113,282 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses – related parties | — | 5,997 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 312,776 | 295,331 | |||||
LONG-TERM DEBT | 198,843 | 198,539 | |||||
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | 136,418 | 91,303 | |||||
Total liabilities | 648,037 | 585,173 | |||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 15) | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |||||||
Preferred stock – $0.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | — | — | |||||
Common stock – $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 89,322 shares and 88,946 shares issued at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and 85,224 shares and 88,887 shares outstanding at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively | 893 | 890 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 105,012 | 87,713 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (20 | ) | (7 | ) | |||
Retained earnings | 331,921 | 192,654 | |||||
Treasury stock – at average cost; 4,098 shares and 59 shares at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively | (66,644 | ) | (103 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 371,162 | 281,147 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,019,199 | $ | 866,320 | |||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
NET SALES | $ | 2,148,069 | $ | 2,073,355 | $ | 1,905,814 | |||||
COST OF GOODS SOLD, BUYING AND OCCUPANCY COSTS | 1,405,430 | 1,318,894 | 1,227,490 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 742,639 | 754,461 | 678,324 | ||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: | |||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 491,599 | 483,823 | 461,073 | ||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | (523 | ) | (308 | ) | 18,000 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 491,076 | 483,515 | 479,073 | ||||||||
OPERATING INCOME | 251,563 | 270,946 | 199,251 | ||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE | 19,555 | 35,804 | 59,493 | ||||||||
INTEREST INCOME | (3 | ) | (12 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME), NET | 40 | (411 | ) | (1,968 | ) | ||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 231,971 | 235,565 | 141,742 | ||||||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE | 92,704 | 94,868 | 14,354 | ||||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 139,267 | $ | 140,697 | $ | 127,388 | |||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME: | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | (13 | ) | (7 | ) | — | ||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ | 139,254 | $ | 140,690 | $ | 127,388 | |||||
Pro forma income before income taxes (Note 13, unaudited) | $ | 141,742 | |||||||||
Pro forma income tax expense (Note 13, unaudited) | 58,434 | ||||||||||
Pro forma net income (Note 13, unaudited) | $ | 83,308 | |||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE: | |||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.49 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1.48 | |||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: | |||||||||||
Basic | 86,852 | 88,596 | 85,369 | ||||||||
Diluted | 87,206 | 88,896 | 86,050 | ||||||||
PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE (Note 13, unaudited): | |||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.98 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.97 | |||||||||
PRO FORMA WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (Note 13, unaudited): | |||||||||||
Basic | 85,369 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 86,050 | ||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Amounts in Thousands)
Common Stock | Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Outstanding | Par Value | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Shares | At Average Cost | Notes Receivable | Total | |||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, January 30, 2010 | 78,246 | $ | 782 | $ | 140,432 | $ | 5,872 | $ | — | — | $ | — | $ | (5,633 | ) | $ | 141,453 | ||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 127,388 | — | — | — | — | 127,388 | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions | — | — | (141,995 | ) | (119,005 | ) | — | — | — | — | (261,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | — | (49,514 | ) | — | — | — | — | (49,514 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Impact of Reorganization (Notes 1 and 10) | — | — | (86,393 | ) | 87,216 | — | — | — | — | 823 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 10,500 | 105 | 159,978 | — | — | — | — | — | 160,083 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of equity shares | (10 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 5,296 | — | — | — | — | — | 5,296 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (40 | ) | — | — | — | — | 40 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Repayment of notes receivable | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,633 | 5,633 | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, January 29, 2011 | 88,696 | 887 | 77,318 | 51,957 | — | 40 | — | — | 130,162 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 140,697 | — | — | — | — | 140,697 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 210 | 3 | 306 | — | — | — | — | — | 309 | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 10,089 | — | — | — | — | — | 10,089 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (19 | ) | — | — | — | — | 19 | (103 | ) | — | (103 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | (7 | ) | — | — | — | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
BALANCE, January 28, 2012 | 88,887 | 890 | 87,713 | 192,654 | (7 | ) | 59 | (103 | ) | — | 281,147 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 139,267 | — | — | — | — | 139,267 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 376 | 3 | 620 | — | — | — | — | 623 | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 16,308 | — | — | — | — | — | 16,308 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from share-based compensation | — | — | 371 | — | — | — | — | — | 371 | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (4,039 | ) | — | — | — | — | 4,039 | (66,541 | ) | — | (66,541 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | (13 | ) | — | — | — | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||
BALANCE, February 2, 2013 | 85,224 | $ | 893 | $ | 105,012 | $ | 331,921 | $ | (20 | ) | 4,098 | $ | (66,644 | ) | $ | — | $ | 371,162 | |||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in Thousands)
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 139,267 | $ | 140,697 | $ | 127,388 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 67,727 | 68,102 | 68,557 | ||||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | 124 | 164 | 1,996 | ||||||||
Impairment charge | 6 | 55 | 459 | ||||||||
Change in fair value of interest rate swap | — | — | (1,968 | ) | |||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation | (422 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Share-based compensation | 16,308 | 10,089 | 5,296 | ||||||||
Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt | — | 5,170 | 8,781 | ||||||||
Deferred taxes | 3,937 | (320 | ) | (19,015 | ) | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Receivables, net | (1,991 | ) | 884 | (5,190 | ) | ||||||
Inventories | (1,997 | ) | (27,862 | ) | (13,505 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable, deferred revenue, and accrued expenses | 17,564 | 43 | 30,103 | ||||||||
Other assets and liabilities | 28,841 | 15,587 | 17,056 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 269,364 | 212,609 | 219,958 | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (99,674 | ) | (77,176 | ) | (54,843 | ) | |||||
Purchase of intangible assets | (210 | ) | (60 | ) | — | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (99,884 | ) | (77,236 | ) | (54,843 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Borrowings under Senior Notes | — | — | 246,498 | ||||||||
Net proceeds from equity offering | — | — | 166,898 | ||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt arrangements | — | (169,775 | ) | (301,563 | ) | ||||||
Costs incurred in connection with debt arrangements and Senior Notes | — | (1,192 | ) | (12,211 | ) | ||||||
Payments on capital lease obligation | (55 | ) | (14 | ) | — | ||||||
Costs incurred in connection with equity offering | — | — | (6,498 | ) | |||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation | 422 | — | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from share-based compensation | 623 | 309 | — | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (66,541 | ) | (103 | ) | — | ||||||
Repayment of notes receivable | — | — | 5,633 | ||||||||
Distributions | — | — | (261,000 | ) | |||||||
Dividends | — | — | (49,514 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (65,551 | ) | (170,775 | ) | (211,757 | ) | |||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE ON CASH | 6 | 2 | — | ||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 103,935 | (35,400 | ) | (46,642 | ) | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period | 152,362 | 187,762 | 234,404 | ||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period | $ | 256,297 | $ | 152,362 | $ | 187,762 | |||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | |||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 17,574 | $ | 26,484 | $ | 40,608 | |||||
Cash paid to taxing authorities | $ | 99,647 | $ | 78,861 | $ | 20,545 | |||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Business Description
Express, Inc., together with its subsidiaries ("Express" or the "Company"), is a specialty apparel and accessories retailer of women's and men's merchandise, targeting the 20 to 30 year old customer. Express merchandise is sold through retail stores and the Company's website, www.express.com. As of February 2, 2013, Express operated 625 primarily mall-based stores in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Additionally, the Company earned revenue from 15 franchise stores. These franchise stores are operated by franchisees pursuant to franchise agreements covering the Middle East, Mexico, and certain other Latin American countries. Under the franchise agreements, the franchisees operate stores that sell Express-branded apparel and accessories purchased directly from the Company.
Fiscal Year
The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. Fiscal years are referred to by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. References herein to "2012," "2011," and "2010" represent the 53-week period ended February 2, 2013 and the 52-week periods ended January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011.
Basis of Presentation
In connection with the initial public offering of the Company's common stock ("IPO") on May 12, 2010, Express Parent LLC ("Express Parent") converted into a Delaware corporation and changed its name from Express Parent LLC to Express, Inc. This conversion was effective May 2, 2010 for tax purposes. In connection with this conversion, all of the equity interests in Express Parent, which consisted of Class L, Class A, and Class C units, were converted into shares of the Company's common stock at a ratio of 0.702, 0.649, and 0.442, respectively. The accounting effects of the recapitalization, collectively referred to as the "Reorganization", are reflected retrospectively for all periods presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Express, Inc., a holding company, owns all of the outstanding equity interests in Express Topco LLC, a holding company, which owns all of the outstanding equity interests in Express Holding LLC ("Express Holding"). Express Holding owns all of the outstanding equity interests in Express, LLC and Express Finance Corp. ("Express Finance"). Express, LLC, together with its subsidiaries, including Express Fashion Operations, LLC, conducts the operations of the Company. Express, LLC was a division of L Brands until it was acquired by an affiliate of Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc. ("Golden Gate") in 2007 (the "Golden Gate Acquisition"). Express Finance was formed on January 28, 2010, solely for the purpose of serving as co-issuer of the 8 3/4% Senior Notes ("Senior Notes") issued on March 5, 2010 and described in Note 9.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified or adjusted to conform to the current year presentation.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, as well as the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The Company revises its estimates and assumptions as new information becomes available.
42
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include investments in U.S. treasury securities and money market funds, payments due from banks for third-party credit card and debit transactions for up to 5 days of sales, cash on hand, and deposits with financial institutions. As of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, amounts due from banks for credit and debit card transactions totaled approximately $12.7 million and $12.6 million, respectively.
Outstanding checks not yet presented for payment amounted to $43.7 million and $20.6 million as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and are included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with various major financial institutions, and, therefore monitors the relative credit standing of these financial institutions. The Company also monitors the creditworthiness of the entities to which it grants credit terms in the normal course of business.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified using the following hierarchy, which is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation as of the measurement date.
Level 1-Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2-Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3-Valuation is based upon other unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table presents the Company's assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
February 2, 2013 | |||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
U.S. treasury securities money market funds | $ | 236,086 | $ | — | $ | — | |||
January 28, 2012 | |||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
U.S. treasury securities money market funds | $ | 131,543 | $ | — | $ | — | |||
The carrying amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash, cash equivalents, receivables, prepaid expenses, and payables as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 approximated their fair values.
Receivables, Net
Receivables, net consist primarily of tenant allowances from landlords and miscellaneous trade receivables, which are continuously reviewed for collectability. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts balance which totaled $1.9 million, $2.9 million, and $3.6 million as of February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are principally valued at the lower of cost or market on a weighted-average cost basis. The Company writes down inventory, the impact of which is reflected in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, if the cost of specific inventory items on hand exceeds the amount it expects to realize from the ultimate sale or disposal of the inventory. These estimates are based on management's judgment regarding future demand and market conditions and analysis of historical experience. The lower of cost or market adjustment to inventory as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 was $7.6 million and $9.0 million, respectively.
43
The Company also records an inventory shrink reserve calculated as a percentage of cost of goods sold for estimated merchandise inventory losses for the period between the last physical inventory count and the balance sheet date. This estimate is based on management's analysis of historical results. The shrink reserve was $16.5 million, $18.2 million, and $15.0 million as of February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011, respectively.
Advertising
Advertising production costs are expensed at the time the promotion first appears in media, store, or on the website, except for direct response advertising costs that relate primarily to the production and distribution of the Company's catalogs. Direct response advertising costs are amortized over the expected future revenue stream, which is typically 1 to 3 months from the date materials are mailed. Total advertising expense totaled $85.8 million, $83.2 million, and $72.6 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Advertising costs are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Private Label Credit Card
The Company has an agreement with a third party to provide customers with private label credit cards (the “Card Agreement”). Each private label credit card bears the logo of the Express brand and can only be used at the Company's retail store locations and website. A third-party financing company is the sole owner of the accounts issued under the private label credit card program and absorbs the losses associated with non-payment by the private label card holders and a portion of any fraudulent usage of the accounts. Pursuant to the Card Agreement, the Company receives reimbursement funds from the third-party financing company for expenses the Company incurs based on usage of the private label credit cards. These reimbursement funds are used by the Company to fund marketing programs associated with the private label credit card and is recognized when the amounts are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured, which is generally at the time the actual usage of the private label credit cards or specified transaction occurs. The funds received related to these private label credit cards are classified in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Loyalty Program
The Company maintains a customer loyalty program (“Loyalty Program”) in which customers earn points toward certificates for qualifying purchases and other benefits. The Loyalty Program was previously restricted to holders of the Company's private label credit cards. However, beginning in 2011, a tender agnostic program was piloted that opened the Loyalty Program to non-private label credit card holders. The Company rolled this program out to stores in the United States in the first quarter of 2012. Upon reaching specified point values, customers are issued a reward, which they may redeem for purchases at the Company's U.S. stores or on its website. Generally, rewards earned must be redeemed within 60 days from the date of issuance. The Company accrues for the anticipated costs related to redemptions of the certificates as points are earned. To calculate this expense, the Company estimates margin rates and makes assumptions related to card holder redemption rates, which are both based on historical experience. The loyalty liability is included in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis, using the following useful lives:
Category | Depreciable Life |
Software, including software developed for internal use | 3 - 7 years |
Store related assets and other property and equipment | 3 - 10 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 5 - 7 years |
Leasehold improvements | Shorter of lease term or useful life of the asset, typically no longer than 15 years |
When a decision is made to dispose of property and equipment prior to the end of the previously estimated useful life, depreciation estimates are revised to reflect the use of the asset over the shortened estimated useful life. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts with any resulting gain or loss included in other operating expense (income), net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals and betterments that extend useful lives are capitalized.
44
Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The reviews are conducted at the store asset level, the lowest identifiable level of cash flow. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the property and equipment are less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes a loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted cash flows of the asset. Factors used to assess the fair value of property and equipment include, but are not limited to, management's plans for future operations, brand initiatives, recent operating results, and projected future cash flows. The impairment charge related to store leasehold improvements in 2012 was minimal. The Company recorded impairment charges related to store leasehold improvements of $0.1 million and $0.5 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Impairment charges are included in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Intangible Assets
The Company has intangible assets, primarily its tradename resulting from the Golden Gate Acquisition in 2007, and internet domain name purchased during 2008 prior to the launch of its e-commerce website. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and may be reviewed more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. The impairment review is performed by assessing qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the asset is less than its carrying amount. The consideration of indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment requires judgments surrounding future operating performance, economic conditions, and business plans, among other factors.
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a basis reflecting when the economic benefits of the assets are consumed or otherwise used up over their respective estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows related to the asset are less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes a loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value, usually determined by the estimated discounted future cash flows of the asset.
The Company did not incur any impairment charges on intangible assets in 2012, 2011, or 2010.
Leases and Leasehold Improvements
The Company has leases that contain pre-determined fixed escalations of minimum rentals and/or rent abatements subsequent to taking possession of the leased property. The related rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis commencing upon possession date. The Company records the difference between the recognized rent expense and amounts payable under the leases as deferred lease credits.
The Company receives allowances from landlords related to its retail stores. These allowances are generally comprised of cash amounts received from landlords as part of negotiated lease terms. The Company records a receivable and a landlord allowance upon execution of the corresponding lease. The landlord allowance is amortized on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease, including the pre-opening build-out period. The receivable is reduced as allowance amounts are received from landlords.
The liability for these deferred lease credits (i.e., pre-determined fixed escalations and unamortized landlord allowances) was $91.5 million and $69.8 million as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and are included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company has leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the shorter of the initial lease term, including renewal periods if reasonably assured, or their estimated useful lives.
The Company records a contingent rent liability in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the corresponding rent expense in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income when specified levels have been achieved or when management determines that achieving the specified levels during the year is probable.
Debt Issuance Costs and Discount
Fees incurred in connection with the Company's borrowings, referred to as debt issuance costs, are capitalized and included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Debt discounts are reflected as a reduction of debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Debt issuance costs and debt discounts are amortized to interest expense over the term of the respective loan agreements. As of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, debt issuance costs totaled $7.6 million and $8.9 million, respectively. The Company recorded normal amortization expense related to debt issuance costs of $1.3 million, $2.5 million,
45
and $3.1 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The Company recorded normal amortization expense for debt discounts of $0.3 million, $0.3 million, and $0.4 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, the amount of taxes currently payable or refundable are accrued, and deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of the Company's assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that the realization of those deferred tax assets will not occur.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates in effect in the years when those temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes from a change in tax rate is recognized through continuing operations in the period that includes the enactment date of the change. Changes in tax laws and rates could affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future.
A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized.
The Company recognizes tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions and adjusts these liabilities when the Company's judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense and the effective tax rate in the period in which the new information becomes available.
Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized within income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Accrued interest and penalties are included within accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The income tax liability was $17.2 million and $28.8 million as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and was included in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company may be subject to periodic audits by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and other taxing authorities. These audits may challenge certain of the Company's tax positions, such as the timing and amount of deductions and allocation of taxable income to the various jurisdictions.
Self Insurance
The Company is generally self-insured in the United States for medical, workers' compensation, and general liability benefits up to certain stop-loss limits. Such costs are accrued based on known claims and estimates of incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) claims. IBNR claims are estimated using historical claim information and actuarial estimates. The accrued liability for self insurance is included in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for the Canadian business. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies were translated into U.S. dollars (the reporting currency) at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies were translated into U.S. dollars at the monthly average exchange rate for the period. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in other expense (income), net whereas related translation adjustments are reported as an element of other comprehensive income, both of which are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes sales at the time the customer takes possession of the merchandise which, for e-commerce revenues, requires an estimate of shipments that have not yet been received by the customer. The estimate of these shipments is based on shipping terms and historical delivery times. Amounts related to shipping and handling revenues billed to customers in an e-commerce sale transaction are classified as net sales, and the related shipping and handling costs are classified as cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The Company's
46
shipping and handling revenues were $17.4 million, $15.8 million, and $13.2 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Associate discounts are classified as a reduction of net sales. Net sales exclude sales tax collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities.
The Company provides a reserve for projected merchandise returns based on prior experience. Merchandise returns are often resalable merchandise and are refunded by issuing the same payment tender of the original purchase. Merchandise exchanges of the same product and price, typically due to size or color preferences, are not considered merchandise returns. The sales returns reserve was $9.8 million and $9.5 million as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company sells gift cards in its retail stores and through its e-commerce website and third parties, which do not expire or lose value over periods of inactivity. The Company accounts for gift cards by recognizing a liability at the time a gift card is sold. The gift card liability balance was $24.0 million and $23.2 million, as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and is included in deferred revenue on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recognizes income from gift cards when they are redeemed by the customer. The Company also recognizes income on unredeemed gift cards, which is recognized proportionately using a time based attribution method from issuance of the gift card to the time when it can be determined that the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed is remote and that there is no legal obligation to remit the unredeemed gift cards to relevant jurisdictions, referred to as "gift card breakage". The gift card breakage rate is based on historical redemption patterns and totaled $2.3 million, $3.5 million, and $2.6 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Gift card breakage is included in net sales in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.
Cost of Goods Sold, Buying and Occupancy Costs
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs, includes merchandise costs, freight, inventory shrinkage, and other gross margin related expenses. Buying and occupancy expenses primarily include payroll, benefit costs, and other operating expenses for the buying departments (merchandising, design, manufacturing, and planning and allocation), distribution, fulfillment, rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes, utilities, maintenance, and depreciation for stores.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative expenses primarily include payroll, benefit costs, and other operating expenses for store selling and administrative departments and store marketing and advertising expenses.
Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net
Other operating (income) expense, net primarily consists of gains/losses on disposal of assets and excess proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims. In 2010 it consisted of advisory fees incurred and paid to Golden Gate and L Brands.
Other Expense (Income), Net
Other expense (income), net, primarily consists of foreign currency transaction gains/losses. In 2010, it consisted of the change in fair market value of the interest rate swap.
Segment Reporting
The Company defines an operating segment on the same basis that it uses to evaluate performance internally. The Company has determined that, together, its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Operating Officer are the Chief Operating Decision Maker beginning in the fourth quarter of 2011, and that there is one operating segment. Therefore, the Company reports results as a single segment, which includes the operation of its Express brick-and-mortar retail stores and e-commerce operations. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2011, the Chief Operating Decision Maker was the Chief Executive Officer.
The following is information regarding the Company's sales channels:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Stores | $ | 1,851,527 | $ | 1,846,323 | $ | 1,740,818 | |||||
E-commerce | 271,497 | 205,489 | 147,535 | ||||||||
Other revenue | 25,045 | 21,543 | 17,461 | ||||||||
Total net sales | $ | 2,148,069 | $ | 2,073,355 | $ | 1,905,814 | |||||
47
Other revenue consists primarily of shipping and handling revenue related to e-commerce activity, gift card breakage, and revenue from our franchise agreements.
Revenues and long-lived assets relating to the Company's international operations for the fifty-three weeks ended February 2, 2013 and the fifty-two weeks ended January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, and as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, were not material and, therefore, not reported separately from domestic revenues and long-lived assets.
3. Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net, consisted of:
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Building improvements | $ | 2,816 | $ | 2,816 | |||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, software | 275,334 | 241,945 | |||||
Leaseholds and improvements | 305,324 | 262,320 | |||||
Construction in process | 41,555 | 14,505 | |||||
Other | 315 | 274 | |||||
Total | 625,344 | 521,860 | |||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | (346,975 | ) | (294,554 | ) | |||
Property and equipment, net | $ | 278,369 | $ | 227,306 | |||
Depreciation expense totaled $64.6 million, $63.0 million, and $61.4 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
4. Leased Facilities and Commitments
Annual store rent consists of a fixed minimum amount and/or contingent rent based on a percentage of sales exceeding a stipulated amount.
Rent expense is summarized as follows:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Store rent: | (in thousands) | ||||||||
Fixed minimum | $ | 180,577 | $ | 163,057 | $ | 156,779 | |||
Contingent | 8,180 | 8,375 | 6,995 | ||||||
Total store rent | 188,757 | 171,432 | 163,774 | ||||||
Home office, distribution center, other | 4,859 | 3,789 | 6,920 | ||||||
Total rent expense | $ | 193,616 | $ | 175,221 | $ | 170,694 | |||
As of February 2, 2013, the Company was committed to noncancelable leases with remaining terms from 1 to 17 years. A substantial portion of these commitments consist of store leases, generally with an initial term of 10 years. Store lease terms typically require additional payments covering real estate taxes, common area maintenance costs, and certain other landlord charges, which are excluded from the following table.
Minimum rent commitments under noncancelable leases are as follows (in thousands):
2013 | $ | 202,548 | |
2014 | 169,217 | ||
2015 | 141,371 | ||
2016 | 118,979 | ||
2017 | 108,855 | ||
Thereafter | 514,831 | ||
Total | $ | 1,255,801 | |
48
5. Lease Financing Obligations
In certain lease arrangements, the Company is involved with the construction of the building. To the extent the Company is involved in the construction of structural improvements or takes construction risk prior to commencement of a lease, it is deemed the owner of the project for accounting purposes. Therefore, the Company records an asset in property and equipment, including any capitalized interest costs, and a related financing obligation for the replacement cost of the Company's portion of the pre-existing building plus the amount of construction-in-progress incurred by the landlord as of the balance sheet date. Once construction is complete, the Company considers the requirements for sale-leaseback treatment, including the transfer of all risks of ownership back to the landlord, and whether the Company has any continuing involvement in the leased property. If the arrangement does not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment, the building assets subject to these obligations remain on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at their historical cost, and such assets are depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The replacement cost of the pre-existing building as well as the costs of construction paid by the landlord are recorded as lease financing obligations in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and a portion of the lease payments are applied as payments of principal and interest. The interest rate selected for lease financing obligations is evaluated at lease inception based on the Company's incremental borrowing rate. At the end of the initial lease term, should the Company decide not to renew the lease, the Company would reverse equal amounts of the net book value of the assets and the corresponding lease finance obligations. The initial lease terms related to these lease arrangements are expected to expire in 2023 and 2029. As of February 2, 2013, the Company recorded $16.2 million in property and equipment, with an offsetting amount to lease financing obligation, both on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These assets and liabilities are classified as non-cash items for purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
Rent expense relating to the land is recognized on a straight-line basis once construction begins. Once the store opens, the Company will not report rent expense for the portion of the rent payment determined to be related to the properties which are owned for accounting purposes. Rather, this portion of rent payment under the lease will be recognized as a reduction of the financing obligation and as interest expense.
6. Intangible Assets
The following table provides the significant components of intangible assets:
February 2, 2013 | |||||||||||
Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Ending Net Balance | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Tradename | $ | 196,144 | $ | — | $ | 196,144 | |||||
Internet domain name/other | 1,575 | — | 1,575 | ||||||||
Net favorable lease obligations | 19,750 | 17,811 | 1,939 | ||||||||
$ | 217,469 | $ | 17,811 | $ | 199,658 | ||||||
January 28, 2012 | |||||||||||
Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Ending Net Balance | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Tradename | $ | 196,144 | $ | — | $ | 196,144 | |||||
Internet domain name/other | 1,365 | — | 1,365 | ||||||||
Net favorable lease obligations | 19,750 | 16,275 | 3,475 | ||||||||
$ | 217,259 | $ | 16,275 | $ | 200,984 | ||||||
The Company's tradename and internet domain name/other have indefinite lives. Net favorable lease obligations are amortized over a period between 5 and 7 years, which represent the remaining life of each respective lease at the evaluation date, and are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amortization expense totaled $1.5 million, $2.3 million, and $3.6 million during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
Estimated future amortization expense is expected to approximate the following (in thousands):
49
2013 | $ | 1,221 | |
2014 | 718 | ||
2015 | — | ||
2016 | — | ||
2017 | — | ||
Thereafter | — | ||
Total | $ | 1,939 | |
7. Related Party Transactions
The transactions described in this note are transactions between the Company and entities affiliated with Golden Gate and L Brands. Prior to July 2007, the Company operated as a division of L Brands. In July 2007, a Golden Gate affiliate acquired approximately 75% of the outstanding equity interests in the Company from L Brands, and the Company began its transition to a stand-alone Company. In May 2010, the Company completed an IPO whereby Golden Gate and L Brands sold a portion of their shares. Since the IPO, both Golden Gate and L Brands gradually reduced their ownership interest in the Company. On July 29, 2011, L Brands sold its remaining ownership interest in the Company and, as a result of this disposition, ceased to be a related party as of the end of the second quarter of 2011. On March 19, 2012, Golden Gate sold its remaining ownership interest in the Company and, as of May 31, 2012, Golden Gate no longer had representation on the Company's Board of Directors ("Board"). As a result, Golden Gate ceased to be a related party as of June 1, 2012.
Transactions with L Brands
The Company is party to a logistics services agreement with an affiliate of L Brands, which provides certain inbound and outbound transportation and delivery services, distribution services, and customs and brokerage services. In addition, the Company is also party to a merchandise sourcing services agreement and a lease agreement for its home office and distribution center, each with separate affiliates of L Brands and different from the affiliate of L Brands that is party to the logistics agreement.
The 2011 related party activity with affiliates of L Brands described in this note includes only those expenses incurred through L Brands' disposition of the Company's common stock on July 29, 2011.
The Company incurred charges from affiliates of L Brands for various services, including home office rent, which are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses, and for merchandise sourcing and logistics services, including distribution center rent, which are included in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs. The amounts included in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income are as follows:
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Merchandise sourcing | $ | 198,162 | $ | 434,642 | |||
Transaction and logistics services | $ | 24,788 | $ | 58,098 | |||
Prior to the IPO, under the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Express Parent ("LLC Agreement"), L Brands was entitled to receive a cash payment at the same time payments were made under an advisory agreement with Golden Gate ("Advisory Agreement") equal to the product of (i) the amount of the fees actually paid in cash under the Advisory Agreement and (ii) the quotient of the number of units held by L Brands over the number of units held by Golden Gate at the time of payment of such Advisory Agreement fees. Effective May 12, 2010, the LLC Agreement, including the advisory arrangement with L Brands, was terminated in connection with the Company’s conversion to a corporation and IPO. The Company paid L Brands a one-time termination fee of $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2010 in connection with the termination of the LLC Agreement.
In 2010, the Company incurred the following charges from L Brands related to advisory fees and the termination of the LLC Agreement. These charges are included in other operating (income) expense, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income:
50
2010 | |||
(in thousands) | |||
L Brands LLC Agreement Fee (including termination fee) | $ | 4,156 | |
Transactions with Golden Gate
In connection with the Golden Gate Acquisition, the Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with Golden Gate that was originally scheduled to expire in July 2017. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company paid Golden Gate an annual management fee equal to the greater of (i) $2.0 million per fiscal year or (ii) 3% of adjusted EBITDA of Express Holding. Additionally, the Company reimbursed Golden Gate for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a result of providing on-going advisory services. Effective May 12, 2010, the Advisory Agreement with Golden Gate was terminated in connection with the Company’s conversion to a corporation and IPO. The Company paid Golden Gate a one-time termination fee of $10.0 million in the second quarter of 2010 in connection with the termination of the Advisory Agreement.
In 2010, the Company incurred the following charges from Golden Gate related to advisory fees, out-of-pocket expenses, and the termination of the Advisory Agreement. These charges are included in other operating (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income:
2010 | |||
(in thousands) | |||
Advisory fees and out-of-pocket expenses (including termination fee) | $ | 12,752 | |
Transactions with Other Golden Gate Affiliates
The Company transacts with affiliates of Golden Gate for e-commerce warehouse and fulfillment services, software license purchases, and consulting and software maintenance services. The 2012 related party activity with affiliates of Golden Gate described in this note includes only those expenses incurred and income earned through the date on which Golden Gate ceased to be a related party, which was May 31, 2012.
The Company incurred the following charges from affiliates of Golden Gate for various services, which are included primarily in cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
E-commerce warehouse and fulfillment | $ | 8,755 | $ | 32,869 | $ | 18,780 | |||||
Software licenses and consulting and software maintenance services | $ | 91 | $ | 228 | $ | 323 | |||||
The Company’s outstanding liability to other Golden Gate affiliates, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related parties on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $6.0 million as of January 28, 2012.
The Company provides real estate services to certain Golden Gate affiliates. Income recognized during 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $0.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of January 28, 2012, the Company's receivable balance related to these services was $0.1 million.
Prior to the prepayments of the 14.5% Topco Term C Loan ("Term C Loan") and 13.5% Topco Term B Loan ("Term B Loan"), collectively referred to as the "Topco Credit Facility", in February 2010 and May 2010, respectively, an affiliate of Golden Gate was owed $50.0 million and $58.3 million, respectively. Total interest expense on the Topco Credit Facility attributed to the Golden Gate affilates was $7.9 million in 2010. The Company did not incur any interest expense under the Topco Credit Facility in 2012 or 2011 due to the prepayments of the Topco Credit Facility in the first half of 2010.
During the first and second quarters of 2011, the Company repurchased $25.0 million and $24.2 million of Senior Notes, respectively, in open market transactions. Of the $49.2 million of Senior Notes repurchased, $40.0 million were held by a Golden Gate affiliate, leaving $10.0 million of Senior Notes owned by a Golden Gate affiliate outstanding as of January 28, 2012. Interest expense incurred on the Senior Notes attributable to the Golden Gate affiliate was $0.3 million, $1.7 million and $4.0 million, during 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
51
The Golden Gate affiliate's portion of cash paid for interest under the Topco Credit Facility and the Senior Notes, was $0.4 million, $3.6 million, and $10.1 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
8. Income Taxes
Prior to May 2, 2010, the Company was treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, had not been subject to federal and state income tax (subject to exception in a limited number of state and local jurisdictions). On May 12, 2010, the Company elected to be treated as a corporation under Subchapter C of Chapter 1 of the United States Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"), effective May 2, 2010 and was, therefore, subject to federal and state tax expense beginning May 2, 2010.
The Reorganization, for tax purposes, was deemed a contribution by Express Parent of its assets and liabilities to the Company, followed by the liquidation of Express Parent. The Reorganization resulted in a taxable gain to Express Parent. Except in those few jurisdictions where Express Parent was taxed directly, the taxable gain flowed through to the members due to Express Parent's partnership tax treatment. The taxable gain correspondingly increased the tax basis in the assets acquired by the Company in the Reorganization. Also, as a result of the Reorganization, the Company had liabilities due to a management holding company and an affiliate of Golden Gate totaling $0.8 million and $4.8 million, respectively, as of January 29, 2011. The Company settled the liability to the management holding company by making a final cash payment during the first quarter of 2011. Additionally, the Company settled the gross liability payable to an affiliate of Golden Gate by making a final cash payment during the second quarter of 2011. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company recorded an additional pre-IPO tax liability of $0.3 million with an offsetting receivable from an affiliate of Golden Gate. The receivable from the affiliate of Golden Gate was settled in the second quarter of 2012.
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Current: | (in thousands) | ||||||||||
U.S. federal | $ | 74,306 | $ | 76,984 | $ | 25,623 | |||||
U.S. state and local | 14,296 | 18,048 | 7,746 | ||||||||
Foreign | 165 | 156 | — | ||||||||
Total | 88,767 | 95,188 | 33,369 | ||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||
U.S. federal | 3,346 | 714 | (16,085 | ) | |||||||
U.S. state and local | 615 | (949 | ) | (2,930 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | (24 | ) | (85 | ) | — | ||||||
Total | 3,937 | (320 | ) | (19,015 | ) | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 92,704 | $ | 94,868 | $ | 14,354 | |||||
The following table provides a reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect | 4.3 | % | 4.7 | % | 4.5 | % | ||
Entity status change from partnership | — | % | — | % | (22.5 | )% | ||
Partnership income not taxable | — | % | — | % | (7.6 | )% | ||
Other items, net | 0.7 | % | 0.6 | % | 0.7 | % | ||
Effective tax rate | 40.0 | % | 40.3 | % | 10.1 | % | ||
The following table provides the effect of temporary differences that created deferred income taxes as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future effects on income taxes resulting from temporary differences and carry-forwards at the end of the respective periods.
52
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||
Accrued expenses and deferred compensation | $ | 24,776 | $ | 22,417 | |||
Rent | 12,703 | 7,831 | |||||
Inventory | — | 1,946 | |||||
Other | 164 | — | |||||
Tax credits/carryforwards | 478 | 114 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (978 | ) | (290 | ) | |||
Total deferred tax assets | 37,143 | 32,018 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||
Inventory | 2,884 | — | |||||
Prepaid expenses | 2,895 | 3,767 | |||||
Intangible assets | 5,981 | 1,764 | |||||
Property and equipment | 9,372 | 5,710 | |||||
Other | — | 829 | |||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 21,132 | 12,070 | |||||
Net deferred tax asset/(liability) | $ | 16,011 | $ | 19,948 | |||
Included in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets are net operating loss carryovers from foreign subsidiaries totaling $0.2 million and $0.1 million as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively. These net operating loss carryovers begin expiring in 2031.
As of February 2, 2013, the valuation allowance for foreign tax credit carryovers totaled $0.3 million. The Company did not have a valuation allowance for foreign tax credit as of January 28, 2012. The foreign tax credit carryovers begin expiring in 2021.
The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward periods are reduced or increased or if objective, negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present, and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence, such as the Company's projections for growth.
No other valuation allowances have been provided for deferred tax assets because management believes that it is more-likely-than-not that the full amount of the net deferred tax assets will be realized in the future.
Net deferred tax assets are classified within the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are included in other current assets for current deferred tax assets and separately identified as deferred taxes for non-current deferred tax assets. Net deferred tax liabilities are classified within the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are included in accrued expenses for current deferred tax liabilities and other long-term liabilities for non-current deferred tax liabilities. The following table summarizes net deferred tax assets:
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Current deferred tax assets | $ | — | $ | 7,486 | ||
Current deferred tax liability | (797 | ) | — | |||
Non-current deferred taxes | 16,808 | 12,462 | ||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 16,011 | $ | 19,948 | ||
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company evaluates tax positions using a more-likely-than-not recognition criterion.
A reconciliation of the beginning to ending unrecognized tax benefits amounts are as follows:
53
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | |||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year | $ | 1,416 | $ | 144 | ||
Gross addition as result of Reorganization | — | — | ||||
Gross addition for tax positions of the current year | 852 | 382 | ||||
Gross addition for tax positions of the prior year | 225 | 1,034 | ||||
Reductions of tax positions of prior years for: | ||||||
Changes in judgment/excess reserve | — | (144 | ) | |||
Settlements during the period | (180 | ) | — | |||
Lapses of applicable statutes of limitations | — | — | ||||
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year | $ | 2,313 | $ | 1,416 | ||
The amount of the above unrecognized tax benefits as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 that would impact the Company's effective tax rate, if recognized, is $2.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. The amount of net interest in tax expense related to interest and penalties for 2012, 2011, and 2010 was negligible.
The Company does not expect material adjustments to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, but the outcome of tax matters is uncertain and unforeseen results can occur.
The Company is currently under examination by the IRS for the period ended January 29, 2011. Tax returns are generally subject to examination for 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return.
As of February 2, 2013, United States taxes had not been provided on unremitted earnings of subsidiaries operating outside of the United States due to an overall deficit position.
9. Debt
Borrowings outstanding consisted of the following:
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
8 3/4% Senior Notes | $ | 200,850 | $ | 200,850 | |||
Debt discount on Senior Notes | (2,007 | ) | (2,311 | ) | |||
Total long-term debt | $ | 198,843 | $ | 198,539 | |||
Revolving Credit Facility
On July 29, 2011, Express Holding, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary, and its subsidiaries entered into an Amended and Restated $200.0 million secured Asset-Based Credit Facility ("Revolving Credit Facility"). As of February 2, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding and approximately $195.8 million available under the the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on July 29, 2016 and allows for up to $30.0 million of swing line advances and up to $45.0 million to be available in the form of letters of credit. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either the rate appearing on Bloomberg L.P.'s Page BBAM1/(Official BBA USD Dollar Libor Fixings) (the “Eurodollar Rate”) plus an applicable margin rate or the highest of (1) the prime lending rate, (2) 0.50% per annum above the federal funds rate and (3) 1% above the Eurodollar Rate, in each case plus an applicable margin rate. The applicable margin rate is determined based on excess availability as determined by reference to the borrowing base. The applicable margin for Eurodollar Rate-based advances is between 1.50% and 2.00% based on the borrowing base.
The unused line fee payable under the Revolving Credit Facility is incurred at 0.375% per annum of the average daily unused revolving commitment during each quarter, payable quarterly in arrears on the first day of each May, August, November, and February. In the event that (1) an event of default has occurred or (2) excess availability plus eligible cash collateral is less than 12.5% of the borrowing base for 5 consecutive days, such unused line fees are payable on the first day of each month.
54
Interest payments under the Revolving Credit Facility are due quarterly on the first day of each May, August, November, and February for base rate-based advances, provided, however, in the event that (1) an event of default has occurred or (2) excess availability plus eligible cash collateral is less than 12.5% of the borrowing base for 5 consecutive days, interest payments are due on the first day of each month. Interest payments under the Revolving Credit Facility are due on the last day of the interest period for Eurodollar Rate-based advances for interest periods of 1, 2, and 3 months, and additionally every 3 months after the first day of the interest period for Eurodollar Rate-based advances for interest periods of greater than 3 months.
The Revolving Credit Facility requires Express Holding and its subsidiaries to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0:1.0 if excess availability plus eligible cash collateral is less than 10% of the borrowing base for 15 consecutive days. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility contains customary covenants and restrictions on Express Holding and its subsidiaries' activities, including, but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness; liens, negative pledges, guarantees, investments, loans, asset sales, mergers, acquisitions, and prepayment of other debt; distributions, dividends, and the repurchase of capital stock; transactions with affiliates; and the ability to change the nature of its business or its fiscal year. All obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by Express Holding and its domestic subsidiaries (that are not borrowers) and secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of Express Holding and its domestic subsidiaries.
Term Loan
In December 2011, the Company prepaid the $119.7 million outstanding balance under its $125.0 million variable rate term loan ("Term Loan").
Senior Notes
On March 5, 2010, Express, LLC and Express Finance, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, co-issued, in a private placement, $250.0 million of 8 3/4% Senior Notes due in 2018 at an offering price of 98.6% of the face value.
Prior to March 1, 2013, a portion of the Senior Notes may be redeemed at 108.75% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings. At any time prior to March 1, 2014, the Senior Notes may be redeemed in part or in full at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus a make-whole premium, calculated in accordance with the indenture governing the Senior Notes, and accrued and unpaid interest. On or after March 1, 2014, the Senior Notes may be redeemed in part or in full at the following percentages of the outstanding principal amount prepaid: 104.375% prior to March 1, 2015; 102.188% on or after March 1, 2015, but prior to March 1, 2016; and at the principal amount on or after March 1, 2016. In the first quarter of 2011, $25.0 million of Senior Notes were repurchased on the open market at a price of 108.75% of the principal amount. In the second quarter of 2011, $24.2 million of Senior Notes were repurchased on the open market at an average price of 109.21% of the principal amount.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains customary covenants and restrictions on the activities of Express, LLC, Express Finance, and Express, LLC's restricted subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, the incurrence of additional indebtedness; payment of dividends or distributions in respect of capital stock or certain other restricted payments or investments; entering into agreements that restrict distributions from restricted subsidiaries; the sale or disposal of assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries; transactions with affiliates; the incurrence of liens; and mergers, consolidations or the sale of substantially all of Express, LLC's assets. Certain of these covenants will be suspended if the Senior Notes are assigned an investment grade rating by both Standard & Poor and Moody's Investors Service and no default has occurred or is continuing. If either rating on the Senior Notes should subsequently decline to below investment grade, the suspended covenants will be reinstated.
Topco Credit Facility
On June 26, 2008, Express Topco, as borrower, entered into a $300.0 million secured term loan facility. The Topco Credit Facility was scheduled to mature on June 26, 2015 and was comprised of a $150.0 million Term B Loan and a $150.0 million Term C Loan. On March 5, 2010, in connection with the Senior Notes offering, all of the Term C Loan was prepaid, plus prepayment penalties and accrued interest thereon. On May 18, 2010, in connection with the IPO, all of the Term B Loan was prepaid, plus prepayment penalties and accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
Loss on Extinguishment
In connection with the prepayment of the Term C Loan on March 10, 2010, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt totaling $7.2 million. This amount consisted of a $3.0 million prepayment penalty, the write-off of $2.5 million of unamortized discount, and the write-off of $1.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs.
55
On May 18, 2010, net proceeds from the IPO were used to prepay $164.9 million related to the Term B Loan (including principal, interest, and a prepayment penalty). Of the Term B Loan prepayment, $58.3 million of principal, $2.1 million of interest, and $3.5 million of the prepayment penalty was paid to a Golden Gate affiliate. In connection with the prepayment of the Term B Loan on May 18, 2010, the Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt totaling $13.6 million. This amount consisted of a $9.0 million prepayment penalty, the write off of $2.5 million of unamortized discount, and the write-off of $2.1 million of unamortized debt issuance costs.
In connection with the Senior Notes repurchases in 2011, the Company recognized a $6.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt. Of this loss on extinguishment of debt, the premium on the repurchases represented $4.4 million. The remaining loss on extinguishment consisted of the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and unamortized discount totaling $2.5 million.
In connection with amending and restating the existing Revolving Credit Facility in 2011, the Company recognized a $0.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which consisted of the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs.
In connection with the prepayment of the Term Loan in 2011, the Company recognized a $2.4 million loss on extinguishment of debt, which consisted of the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs.
Loss on extinguishments of debt were recorded as interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The write-offs of unamortized debt issuance costs and unamortized discounts represent a non-cash adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of the Senior Notes was estimated using a number of factors, such as recent trade activity, size, timing, and yields of comparable bonds and is, therefore, within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As of February 2, 2013, the estimated fair value of the Senior Notes was $217.9 million.
Letters of Credit
The Company may enter into various trade letters of credit ("trade LCs") in favor of certain vendors to secure merchandise. These trade LCs are issued for a defined period of time, for specific shipments, and generally expire 3 weeks after the merchandise shipment date. As of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, there were no outstanding trade LCs. Additionally, the Company enters into stand-by letters of credit ("stand-by LCs") on an as-need basis to secure merchandise and fund other general and administrative costs. As of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, outstanding stand-by LCs totaled $2.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
10. Stockholders' Equity
Prior to the Reorganization (see Note 1), the Company was a limited liability company with outstanding Class L, A, and C equity units.
Certain executive management members were provided the opportunity to purchase equity ownership for a combination of cash and promissory notes payable. These 7-year promissory notes were fully-recourse to the employee, accrued interest on an arm's length rate basis, and were secured by a pledge of all equity interests purchased by the executive management member. On February 9, 2010, management promissory notes totaling $5.6 million were repaid in full by each member of management, and, therefore, interest income received by the Company in 2010 was negligible.
On May, 18, 2010, the Company sold 10.5 million shares of newly-issued common stock in the IPO, raising net proceeds of approximately $160.1 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and costs incurred related to the IPO.
In conjunction with the Reorganization described in Note 1, the Company’s certificate of incorporation authorized 500.0 million shares of common stock and 10.0 million shares of preferred stock. No preferred stock was issued or outstanding as of February 2, 2013 or January 28, 2012. Further, effective May 2, 2010, the Company became taxed as a corporation rather than as a partnership. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") Topic 4B, the Company reclassified $87.2 million in undistributed losses through May 12, 2010 to additional paid-in-capital. The Company also recorded a non-cash capital contribution of $0.8 million related to certain tax assets it received.
56
On November 30, 2010, the Board approved a special dividend of $0.56 per share of the Company's common stock, totaling $49.5 million. The special dividend was paid on December 23, 2010 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 16, 2010.
During 2011 and 2010, the Company repurchased certain shares of common stock or equity units at cost from employees who were separated from the Company.
On May 24, 2012, the Company's Board authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of the Company's common stock ("Repurchase Program"), which may be made from time to time in open market or privately negotiated transactions. In 2012, the Company repurchased 4.0 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $16.38 per share, totaling $65.1 million, including commissions.
11. Share-Based Compensation
The Company records the fair value of share-based payments to employees in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income as compensation expense, net of forfeitures, over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis.
Share-based Compensation Plans
Prior to the IPO, the Company maintained an equity incentive program. In connection with the IPO, the equity from this program was converted into restricted shares of the Company, and this program was terminated.
In 2010, the Board approved, and the Company implemented, the Express, Inc. 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended, the "2010 Plan"). The 2010 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board and its designees to offer eligible employees cash and stock-based incentives as deemed appropriate in order to attract, retain, and reward such individuals. Effective April 3, 2012, the Board amended the 2010 Plan to, among other things, reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2010 Plan. As of February 2, 2013, 15.2 million shares were authorized to be granted under the 2010 Plan and 10.4 million were available for future issuance.
The following summarizes our share-based compensation expense:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||
Stock options | $ | 8,123 | $ | 6,323 | $ | 2,044 | |||||
Restricted stock units and restricted stock | 8,171 | 3,597 | 102 | ||||||||
Restricted shares (equity issued pre-IPO) | 14 | 169 | 3,150 | ||||||||
Total share-based compensation | $ | 16,308 | $ | 10,089 | $ | 5,296 | |||||
The stock compensation related income tax benefit recognized by the Company in 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $1.7 million, $0.1 million and $0.0 million, respectively.
Stock Options
During the 2012, the Company granted stock options under the 2010 Plan. The fair value of the stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model as described later in this note. The majority of stock options granted under the 2010 Plan vest 25% per year over 4 years and have a 10 year contractual life, however those granted to the Chief Executive Officer vest ratably over 3 years. The expense for stock options is recognized using the straight-line attribution method.
The Company's activity with respect to stock options during 2012 was as follows:
57
Number of Shares | Grant Date Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts and years) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, January 28, 2012 | 2,667 | $ | 17.93 | |||||||||
Granted | 580 | $ | 23.89 | |||||||||
Exercised | (37 | ) | $ | 17.43 | ||||||||
Forfeited or expired | (118 | ) | $ | 19.53 | ||||||||
Outstanding, February 2, 2013 | 3,092 | $ | 18.99 | 8 | $ | 2,275 | ||||||
Expected to vest at February 2, 2013 | 2,001 | $ | 19.60 | 8.2 | $ | 1,246 | ||||||
Exercisable at February 2, 2013 | 987 | $ | 17.64 | 7.6 | $ | 952 | ||||||
The following provides additional information regarding the Company's stock options:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted | $ | 12.75 | $ | 10.01 | $ | 9.17 | |||||
Total intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | 270 | $ | 102 | $ | — | |||||
Total fair value of options vested | $ | 6,779 | $ | 3,115 | $ | — | |||||
As of February 2, 2013, there was approximately $14.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.0 year.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value stock options granted to employees and directors. The Company's determination of the fair value of stock options is affected by the Company's stock price as well as a number of subjective and complex assumptions. These assumptions include the risk-free interest rate, the Company's expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, expected term of the award, and dividend yield.
The fair value of stock options was estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate (1) | 1.12 | % | 2.27 | % | 2.84 | % | ||
Price Volatility (2) | 55.9 | % | 54.0 | % | 54.0 | % | ||
Expected term (years) (3) | 6.17 | 6.25 | 6.25 | |||||
Dividend yield (4) | — | — | — | |||||
(1) | Represents the yield on U.S. Treasury securities with a term consistent with the expected term of the stock options. |
(2) | For the first two years following the Company's IPO, this was based on the historical volatility of selected comparable companies over a period consistent with the expected term of the stock options because the Company had a limited history of being publicly traded. Comparable companies were selected primarily based on industry, stage of life cycle, and size. Beginning with the second anniversary of the IPO n May 2012, the Company began using its own volatility as an additional input in the determination of expected volatility. |
(3) | Calculated utilizing the “simplified” methodology prescribed by SAB No. 107 due to the lack of historical exercise data necessary to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the term. |
(4) | The Company does not currently plan on paying regular dividends. |
Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock
During 2012, the Company granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and restricted stock under the 2010 Plan, including 0.4 million shares of performance-based restricted stock and 0.1 million shares of performance-based RSUs. The fair value of the RSUs and restricted stock is determined based on the Company's stock price on the grant date. The expense for RSUs and restricted stock is recognized using the straight-line attribution method, except for awards with performance conditions, for
58
which the graded vesting method is used. These awards have vesting conditions with requisite service periods of 3 years for the Chief Executive Officer, 4 years for other employees, and 1 year for members of the Board.
The Company's activity with respect to RSUs and restricted stock for the 2012 was as follows:
Number of Shares | Grant Date Weighted Average Fair Value | ||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||
Unvested, January 28, 2012 | 900 | $ | 18.52 | ||
Granted | 837 | $ | 23.97 | ||
Vested | (180 | ) | $ | 17.95 | |
Forfeited | (339 | ) | $ | 23.18 | |
Unvested, February 2, 2013 | 1,218 | $ | 21.49 | ||
The total fair value/intrinsic value of RSUs and restricted stock that vested was $3.2 million and $0.1 million during 2012 and 2011, respectively. No RSUs or restricted stock vested during 2010. As of February 2, 2013, there was approximately $15.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs and restricted stock, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.3 years.
12. Earnings Per Share
The following table provides a reconciliation between basic and diluted weighted-average shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share:
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Weighted-average shares - basic | 86,852 | 88,596 | 85,369 | |||||
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units, and restricted stock | 354 | 300 | 681 | |||||
Weighted-average shares - diluted | 87,206 | 88,896 | 86,050 | |||||
Equity awards representing 3.1 million, 2.3 million and 1.3 million shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, as the effects of the awards would have been anti-dilutive.
13. Pro forma Information (unaudited)
The pro forma net income applied in computing the pro forma earnings per share for 2010 is based on the Company’s historical net income as adjusted to reflect the Company’s conversion to a corporation as if it had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods. In connection with the conversion, effective May 2, 2010, the Company became taxed as a corporation. The Company was previously treated as a partnership for tax purposes and, therefore, generally not subject to federal income tax. The pro forma net income includes adjustments for income tax expense as if the Company had been a corporation at an assumed combined federal, state, and local income tax rate of 40.9% for the first thirteen weeks of 2010.
The pro forma net income for 2010 eliminates the non-cash deferred tax benefit of $31.8 million as a non-recurring item related to the Reorganization (see Note 8).
14. Retirement Benefits
The employees of the Company, if eligible, participate in a qualified defined contribution retirement plan (the “Qualified Plan”) and a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan (the “Non-Qualified Plan”) sponsored by the Company.
Participation in the Company's Qualified Plan is available to employees who meet certain age and service requirements. The Qualified Plan permits employees to elect contributions up to the maximum limits allowable under the IRC. The Company matches employee contributions according to a pre-determined formula and contributes additional discretionary amounts based on a percentage of the employees' eligible annual compensation and years of service. Employee contributions and Company
59
matching contributions vest immediately. Additional discretionary Company contributions and the related investment earnings are subject to vesting based on years of service.
Total expense recognized related to the Qualified Plan employer match was $2.7 million, $2.6 million, and $2.7 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. In addition, the Company recognized expense of $5.4 million, $5.4 million ,and $6.1 million related to discretionary contributions to the Qualified Plan in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
Participation in the Non-Qualified Plan is made available to employees who meet certain age, service, job level, and compensation requirements. The Non-Qualified Plan is an unfunded plan which provides benefits beyond the IRC limits for qualified defined contribution plans. The plan permits employees to elect contributions up to a maximum percentage of eligible compensation. The Company matches employee contributions according to a pre-determined formula and credits additional amounts based on a percentage of the employees' eligible compensation and years of service. The Non-Qualified Plan also permits employees to defer additional compensation up to a maximum amount. The Company does not match the contributions for additional deferred compensation. Employees' accounts are credited with interest using a rate determined annually by the Retirement Plan Committee based on a methodology consistent with historical practices. Employee contributions and the related interest vest immediately. Company contributions and the related interest are subject to vesting based on years of service. Employees may elect an in-service distribution for the additional deferred compensation component only. Employees are not permitted to take a withdrawal from any other portion of the Non-Qualified Plan while actively employed with the Company. The remaining vested portion of employees' accounts in the Non-Qualified Plan will be distributed upon termination of employment in either a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a specified period of up to 10 years. Total expense recognized related to the Non-Qualified Plan was $3.5 million, $3.6 million, and $2.5 million, in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
The Company elected to account for this cash balance plan based on the participant account balances, excluding actuarial considerations as permitted by the applicable authoritative guidance.
The annual activity for the Company's Non-Qualified Plan, was as follows:
February 2, 2013 | January 28, 2012 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 19,170 | $ | 14,240 | |||
Contributions: | |||||||
Employee | 2,833 | 2,487 | |||||
Company | 2,246 | 2,379 | |||||
Interest | 1,534 | 1,239 | |||||
Distributions | (1,694 | ) | (1,151 | ) | |||
Forfeitures | — | (24 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 24,089 | $ | 19,170 | |||
In addition, as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, the Company accrued $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of contributions related to the respective current year that will be credited to employee accounts in the following year. These amounts along with the above-mentioned amounts of $24.1 million and $19.2 million for the period ended February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, total $25.4 million and $20.8 million, respectively, and are included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
In a complaint filed on July 7, 2011 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois styled as Eric Wynn, et al., v. Express, LLC, Express was named as a defendant in a purported nationwide collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and of applicable Illinois state wage and hour statutes related to alleged off-the-clock work. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and attorneys' fees. In March 2012, the court granted conditional collective action certification.
To avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation with respect to this matter, in January 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement to resolve all wage and hour claims that were asserted or could have been asserted by the plaintiffs and other similarly situated employees and former employees who opted-in to the collective action. The settlement agreement remains subject to court approval. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the Company will pay approximately $0.4
60
million in the aggregate to (i) plaintiffs and other employees and former employees who opted-in to the collective action, and (ii) certain legal fees and expenses on behalf of the plaintiffs and other employees and former employees who opted-in to the collective action. As of February 2, 2012, the Consolidated Balance Sheets included a reserve for the settlement amount. If the settlement is not approved by the court, the amount of the reserve may increase or decrease.
The Company is subject to various other claims and contingencies arising out of the normal course of business. Management believes that the ultimate liability arising from such claims and contingencies, if any, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
16. Guarantor Subsidiaries
On March 5, 2010, Express, LLC and Express Finance (the “Subsidiary Issuers”), both 100% owned indirect subsidiaries of the Company, issued the Senior Notes. The Company (“Guarantor”) and certain of the Company’s indirect 100% owned subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”) have guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, the Company’s obligations under the Senior Notes. The guarantees are not full and unconditional because Guarantor Subsidiaries can be released and relieved of their obligations under certain customary circumstances contained in the indenture governing the Senior Notes. These circumstances include the following, so long as other applicable provisions of the indenture are adhered to: any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of any Guarantor Subsidiary, any sale or other disposition of capital stock of any Guarantor Subsidiary, or designation of any restricted subsidiary that is a Guarantor Subsidiary as an unrestricted subsidiary. On August 26, 2012, Express, LLC contributed certain assets and liabilities to a newly created Guarantor Subsidiary. As a result, the current and prior period condensed consolidating financial information has been revised to retroactively give effect to the new structure in place as of August 26, 2012.
The following consolidating schedules present the condensed financial information on a combined basis.
61
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(Amounts in thousands)
February 2, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Subsidiary Issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Other Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 938 | $ | 230,174 | $ | 22,924 | $ | 2,261 | $ | — | $ | 256,297 | |||||||||||
Receivables, net | — | 5,612 | 3,147 | 2,265 | — | 11,024 | |||||||||||||||||
Inventories | — | 13,597 | 198,094 | 3,391 | — | 215,082 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepaid minimum rent | — | 451 | 23,697 | 1,018 | — | 25,166 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany loan receivable | — | 20,754 | — | — | (20,754 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivable | — | — | 98,304 | 5,783 | (104,087 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 5,085 | 3,162 | 46 | — | 8,293 | |||||||||||||||||
Total current assets | 938 | 275,673 | 349,328 | 14,764 | (124,841 | ) | 515,862 | ||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net | — | 46,913 | 215,829 | 15,627 | — | 278,369 | |||||||||||||||||
Tradename/domain name | — | 197,719 | — | — | — | 197,719 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiary | 369,140 | 371,084 | — | 363,356 | (1,103,580 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 738 | 10,369 | 5,701 | — | — | 16,808 | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets | — | 7,710 | 2,727 | 4 | — | 10,441 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 370,816 | $ | 909,468 | $ | 573,585 | $ | 393,751 | $ | (1,228,421 | ) | $ | 1,019,199 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | — | $ | 173,395 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 1,598 | $ | — | $ | 176,125 | |||||||||||
Deferred revenue | — | 1,223 | 26,507 | 121 | — | 27,851 | |||||||||||||||||
Accrued bonus | — | — | 334 | 2 | — | 336 | |||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | (346 | ) | 34,490 | 72,963 | 1,357 | — | 108,464 | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable | — | 104,087 | — | — | (104,087 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany loan payable | — | — | — | 20,754 | (20,754 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | (346 | ) | 313,195 | 100,936 | 23,832 | (124,841 | ) | 312,776 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | — | 198,843 | — | — | — | 198,843 | |||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | — | 34,074 | 96,706 | 5,638 | — | 136,418 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | (346 | ) | 546,112 | 197,642 | 29,470 | (124,841 | ) | 648,037 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 371,162 | 363,356 | 375,943 | 364,281 | (1,103,580 | ) | 371,162 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 370,816 | $ | 909,468 | $ | 573,585 | $ | 393,751 | $ | (1,228,421 | ) | $ | 1,019,199 | ||||||||||
62
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(Amounts in thousands)
January 28, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Subsidiary Issuers | Guarantor Subsidiaries | Other Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,575 | $ | 121,273 | $ | 27,964 | $ | 1,550 | $ | — | $ | 152,362 | |||||||||||
Receivables, net | — | 1,917 | 5,522 | 1,588 | — | 9,027 | |||||||||||||||||
Inventories | — | 22,681 | 187,947 | 2,447 | — | 213,075 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepaid minimum rent | — | 219 | 22,766 | 476 | — | 23,461 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany loan receivable | — | 12,684 | — | — | (12,684 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivable | — | — | — | 5,862 | (5,862 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 20,188 | (1,960 | ) | 4 | — | 18,232 | ||||||||||||||||
Total current assets | 1,575 | 178,962 | 242,239 | 11,927 | (18,546 | ) | 416,157 | ||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net | — | 31,415 | 187,286 | 8,605 | — | 227,306 | |||||||||||||||||
Tradename/domain name | — | 197,509 | — | — | — | 197,509 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiary | 277,920 | 300,747 | — | 272,135 | (850,802 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 852 | 7,224 | 4,386 | — | — | 12,462 | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets | — | 8,956 | 3,926 | 4 | — | 12,886 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 280,347 | $ | 724,813 | $ | 437,837 | $ | 292,671 | $ | (869,348 | ) | $ | 866,320 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | — | $ | 131,767 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 618 | $ | — | $ | 133,679 | |||||||||||
Deferred revenue | — | 3,158 | 24,476 | 50 | — | 27,684 | |||||||||||||||||
Accrued bonus | — | 13,486 | 1,185 | 18 | — | 14,689 | |||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | (800 | ) | 63,899 | 48,644 | 1,539 | — | 113,282 | ||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses—related parties | — | 5,997 | — | — | — | 5,997 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany payable | — | 5,862 | — | — | (5,862 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Intercompany loan payable | — | — | — | 12,684 | (12,684 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | (800 | ) | 224,169 | 75,599 | 14,909 | (18,546 | ) | 295,331 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | — | 198,539 | — | — | — | 198,539 | |||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | — | 29,970 | 58,189 | 3,144 | — | 91,303 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | (800 | ) | 452,678 | 133,788 | 18,053 | (18,546 | ) | 585,173 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 281,147 | 272,135 | 304,049 | 274,618 | (850,802 | ) | 281,147 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 280,347 | $ | 724,813 | $ | 437,837 | $ | 292,671 | $ | (869,348 | ) | $ | 866,320 | ||||||||||
63
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Issuers | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | — | $ | 1,302,433 | $ | 2,123,918 | $ | 19,514 | $ | (1,297,796 | ) | $ | 2,148,069 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs | — | 952,711 | 1,737,406 | 12,184 | (1,296,871 | ) | 1,405,430 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | — | 349,722 | 386,512 | 7,330 | (925 | ) | 742,639 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 697 | 185,434 | 297,595 | 8,798 | (925 | ) | 491,599 | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expense (income), net | — | (41 | ) | (482 | ) | — | — | (523 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (697 | ) | 164,329 | 89,399 | (1,468 | ) | — | 251,563 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | 19,555 | 9 | 41 | (50 | ) | 19,555 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | — | (50 | ) | — | (3 | ) | 50 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Income) loss in subsidiary | (139,734 | ) | (70,182 | ) | — | (139,735 | ) | 349,651 | — | ||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | — | — | — | 40 | — | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 139,037 | 215,006 | 89,390 | 138,189 | (349,651 | ) | 231,971 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (230 | ) | 75,271 | 17,662 | 1 | — | 92,704 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 139,267 | $ | 139,735 | $ | 71,728 | $ | 138,188 | $ | (349,651 | ) | $ | 139,267 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | (13 | ) | (13 | ) | — | (26 | ) | 39 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 139,254 | $ | 139,722 | $ | 71,728 | $ | 138,162 | $ | (349,612 | ) | $ | 139,254 | ||||||||||
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Issuers | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | — | $ | 1,282,691 | $ | 2,065,958 | $ | 5,908 | $ | (1,281,202 | ) | $ | 2,073,355 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs | — | 893,726 | 1,699,784 | 6,136 | (1,280,752 | ) | 1,318,894 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | — | 388,965 | 366,174 | (228 | ) | (450 | ) | 754,461 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 1,689 | 183,780 | 294,875 | 3,929 | (450 | ) | 483,823 | ||||||||||||||||
Other operating expense (income), net | — | — | (308 | ) | — | — | (308 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (1,689 | ) | 205,185 | 71,607 | (4,157 | ) | — | 270,946 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | 35,804 | — | 115 | (115 | ) | 35,804 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | — | (127 | ) | — | — | 115 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(Income) loss in subsidiary | (141,474 | ) | (38,469 | ) | — | (141,192 | ) | 321,135 | — | ||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | — | — | — | (411 | ) | — | (411 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 139,785 | 207,977 | 71,607 | 137,331 | (321,135 | ) | 235,565 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (912 | ) | 66,785 | 29,277 | (282 | ) | — | 94,868 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 140,697 | $ | 141,192 | $ | 42,330 | $ | 137,613 | $ | (321,135 | ) | $ | 140,697 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | — | (14 | ) | 21 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 140,690 | $ | 141,185 | $ | 42,330 | $ | 137,599 | $ | (321,114 | ) | $ | 140,690 | ||||||||||
64
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Issuers | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | — | $ | 1,118,503 | $ | 1,904,684 | $ | — | $ | (1,117,373 | ) | $ | 1,905,814 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs | — | 776,840 | 1,567,573 | — | (1,116,923 | ) | 1,227,490 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | — | 341,663 | 337,111 | — | (450 | ) | 678,324 | ||||||||||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 2,984 | 169,753 | 288,809 | (23 | ) | (450 | ) | 461,073 | |||||||||||||||
Other operating expense (income), net | — | 16,904 | 1,093 | 3 | — | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (2,984 | ) | 155,006 | 47,209 | 20 | — | 199,251 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | — | 30,510 | — | 28,983 | — | 59,493 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income | — | (16 | ) | — | — | — | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(Income) loss in subsidiary | (129,939 | ) | (39,797 | ) | — | (153,742 | ) | 323,478 | — | ||||||||||||||
Other expense (income), net | — | (1,968 | ) | — | — | — | (1,968 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 126,955 | 166,277 | 47,209 | 124,779 | (323,478 | ) | 141,742 | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (433 | ) | 12,535 | 7,412 | (5,160 | ) | — | 14,354 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 127,388 | $ | 153,742 | $ | 39,797 | $ | 129,939 | $ | (323,478 | ) | $ | 127,388 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 127,388 | $ | 153,742 | $ | 39,797 | $ | 129,939 | $ | (323,478 | ) | $ | 127,388 | ||||||||||
65
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Issuers | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 81 | $ | 207,148 | $ | 61,440 | $ | 695 | $ | — | $ | 269,364 | |||||||||||
Investing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | — | (25,134 | ) | (66,480 | ) | (8,060 | ) | — | (99,674 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase of intangible assets | — | (210 | ) | — | — | — | (210 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Distributions received | 65,200 | — | — | 65,200 | (130,400 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 65,200 | (25,344 | ) | (66,480 | ) | 57,140 | (130,400 | ) | (99,884 | ) | |||||||||||||
Financing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligation | — | (55 | ) | — | — | — | (55 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation | — | 422 | — | — | — | 422 | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from share-based compensation | 623 | — | — | — | — | 623 | |||||||||||||||||
Repayment of intercompany loan | — | 3,982 | — | (3,982 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under intercompany loan | — | (12,052 | ) | — | 12,052 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions paid | — | (65,200 | ) | — | (65,200 | ) | 130,400 | — | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (66,541 | ) | — | — | — | — | (66,541 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (65,918 | ) | (72,903 | ) | — | (57,130 | ) | 130,400 | (65,551 | ) | |||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash | — | — | — | 6 | — | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (637 | ) | 108,901 | (5,040 | ) | 711 | — | 103,935 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 1,575 | 121,273 | 27,964 | 1,550 | — | 152,362 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 938 | $ | 230,174 | $ | 22,924 | $ | 2,261 | $ | — | $ | 256,297 | |||||||||||
66
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Issuers | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (381 | ) | $ | 159,803 | $ | 55,436 | $ | (2,249 | ) | $ | — | $ | 212,609 | |||||||||
Investing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | — | (18,182 | ) | (50,107 | ) | (8,887 | ) | — | (77,176 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase of intangible assets | — | (60 | ) | — | — | — | (60 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Distributions received | 103 | — | — | 103 | (206 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 103 | (18,242 | ) | (50,107 | ) | (8,784 | ) | (206 | ) | (77,236 | ) | ||||||||||||
Financing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt arrangements | — | (169,775 | ) | — | — | — | (169,775 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Costs incurred in connection with debt arrangements and Senior Notes | — | (1,192 | ) | — | — | — | (1,192 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Payments on capital lease obligation | — | (14 | ) | — | — | — | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from share-based compensation | 309 | — | — | — | — | 309 | |||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under intercompany loan | — | (12,684 | ) | — | 12,684 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions paid | — | (103 | ) | — | (103 | ) | 206 | — | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (103 | ) | — | — | — | — | (103 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 206 | (183,768 | ) | — | 12,581 | 206 | (170,775 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash | — | — | — | 2 | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (72 | ) | (42,207 | ) | 5,329 | 1,550 | — | (35,400 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 1,647 | 163,480 | 22,635 | — | — | 187,762 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 1,575 | $ | 121,273 | $ | 27,964 | $ | 1,550 | $ | — | $ | 152,362 | |||||||||||
67
EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiary | Guarantor | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Express, Inc. | Issuers | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (3,330 | ) | $ | 198,522 | $ | 60,261 | $ | (35,495 | ) | $ | — | $ | 219,958 | |||||||||
Investing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | — | (100 | ) | (54,743 | ) | — | — | (54,843 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiary | (170,535 | ) | — | — | (5,633 | ) | 176,168 | — | |||||||||||||||
Distributions received | 319,801 | — | — | 490,954 | (810,755 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 149,266 | (100 | ) | (54,743 | ) | 485,321 | (634,587 | ) | (54,843 | ) | |||||||||||||
Financing Activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowing under Senior Notes | — | 246,498 | — | — | — | 246,498 | |||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from equity offering | 166,898 | — | — | — | — | 166,898 | |||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt arrangements | — | (1,563 | ) | — | (300,000 | ) | — | (301,563 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Costs incurred in connection with debt arrangements and Senior Notes | — | (11,651 | ) | — | (560 | ) | — | (12,211 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Costs incurred in connection with equity offering | (6,498 | ) | — | — | — | — | (6,498 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity contributions | 5,633 | — | — | 170,535 | (176,168 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Repayment of notes receivable | — | 5,633 | — | — | — | 5,633 | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions | (261,000 | ) | (441,440 | ) | — | (270,287 | ) | 711,727 | (261,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends | (49,514 | ) | (49,514 | ) | — | (49,514 | ) | 99,028 | (49,514 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (144,481 | ) | (252,037 | ) | — | (449,826 | ) | 634,587 | (211,757 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 1,455 | (53,615 | ) | 5,518 | — | — | (46,642 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 192 | 217,095 | 17,117 | — | — | 234,404 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 1,647 | $ | 163,480 | $ | 22,635 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 187,762 | |||||||||||
68
17. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Summarized unaudited quarterly financial results for 2012 and 2011 follows:
2012 Quarter | First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 495,952 | $ | 454,879 | $ | 468,527 | $ | 728,711 | ||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 188,767 | $ | 146,521 | $ | 151,538 | $ | 255,813 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 42,073 | $ | 15,829 | $ | 17,422 | $ | 63,943 | ||||||||
Earnings per basic share | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
Earnings per diluted share | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
2011 Quarter | First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 467,377 | $ | 446,041 | $ | 486,784 | $ | 673,153 | ||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 178,314 | $ | 149,832 | $ | 175,968 | $ | 250,347 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 35,013 | $ | 12,620 | $ | 32,670 | $ | 60,394 | ||||||||
Earnings basic share | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||
Earnings per diluted share | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act of 1934) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act of 1934 reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation prior to filing this report of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of February 2, 2013.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for designing, maintaining, and evaluating adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company's financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may
69
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by COSO. Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of February 2, 2013, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this Report on Form 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013, as stated in their report which is included in “ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled "Election of Directors", "Executive Officers", "Corporate Governance" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled "Executive Compensation", "Corporate Governance - Director Compensation", "Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Executive Compensation - Compensation and Governance Committee Report" in the Proxy Statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Stock Ownership Information" in the Proxy Statement for its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The following table summarizes share and exercise price information about Express' equity compensation plan as of February 2, 2013.
70
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of oustanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||
Category | (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3,323,291 | 20.00 | 10,384,510 | ||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | ||||||
Total | 3,323,291 | 20.00 | 10,384,510 | ||||||
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled "Related Person Transactions" and "Corporate Governance - Director Independence" in the Proxy Statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Audit Committee - Principal Accountant Fees and Services" in the Proxy Statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) (1) Consolidated Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of Express, Inc. and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this report under Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules have been omitted because they are not required or are not applicable or because the information required to be set forth therein either is not material or is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) | List of Exhibits |
The following exhibits are either included in this report or incorporated by reference as indicated in the following:
71
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1 | Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2007, among Express Investment Corp., Limited Brands Store Operations, Inc., Express Holding, LLC and Limited Brands, Inc. (“Unit Purchase Agreement”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Express, Inc.'s registration statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-164906) (the “Express S-1”), filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010). | |
2.2 | Amendment No. 1 to Unit Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010). | |
2.3 | Conversion Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2010, by and among Express Parent LLC, Express Management Investors Blocker, Inc., Express Investment Corp., Limited Brands Store Operations, Inc. and EXP Investments, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2010). | |
2.4 | Form of Agreement and Plan of Merger among Express, Inc., Express Management Investors Blocker, Inc., Express Management Investors LLC, Express Investment Corp., Multi-Channel Retail Holdings LLC - Series G and Express Holding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2010). | |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of Express, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Express, Inc.'s registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-168097), filed with the SEC on July 14, 2010 (the “Express S-8”)). | |
3.2 | Bylaws of Express, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Express S-8). | |
4.1 | Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010.) | |
4.2 | Indenture, dated March 5, 2010, among Express, LLC, Express Finance Corp., the Guarantors and U.S. National Bank Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010). | |
4.3 | Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Express, LLC, Express Finance Corp., Express Parent LLC, Express GC, LLC and Banc of America Securities LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (incorporated by reference to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010). | |
4.4 | Form of Registration Agreement between Express, Inc. and the other signatories thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.1+ | Employment Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2010, by and among Express, LLC, Express Parent LLC and Michael A. Weiss (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010). | |
10.2+ | Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2010, by and among Express, LLC, Express Parent LLC and Michael A. Weiss (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 19, 2010). | |
10.3+ | Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement, made and entered into on September 1, 2011, by and between Express, Inc. and Michael Weiss (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 6, 2011). | |
10.4+ | Form of Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2010). | |
10.5+ | Amended and Restated Express, Inc. 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to Express Inc.'s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2012). | |
72
10.6+ | Amendment No. 1 to Express, Inc. 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on June 3, 2011). | |
10.7+ | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.8+ | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.9+ | Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.10+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.11+ | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.12 | Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.13 | Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 5, 2011). | |
10.14 | Form of Letter Agreement by and among Limited Brands, Inc., Express, Inc., Express Topco LLC, Express Holding, LLC, Express, LLC, Express Finance Corp. and Express GC, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.15 | Form of Letter Agreement by and among Golden Gate Private Equity, Inc., Express, Inc., Express Topco LLC, Express Holding, LLC, Express, LLC, Express Finance Corp. and Express GC, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.16+ | Letter Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2010, between Michael F. Devine, III and Express Parent LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Express S-1, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2010). | |
10.17+ | Letter Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2010, between Mylle H. Mangum and Express, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 3, 2010). | |
10.18+ | Offer Letter, dated July 29, 2011, from Express, LLC to Dominic Paul Dascoli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 23, 2011). | |
10.19+ | Severance Agreement, dated September 20, 2011, between Express, LLC and Dominic Paul Dascoli (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 23, 2011). | |
10.20 | Amended and Restated $200,000,000 Asset-Based Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2011 among Express Holding, LLC, as Parent, Express, LLC, as Borrower, the Initial Lenders, Initial Issuing Bank and Swing Line Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, U.S. Bank National Association, as Syndication Agent and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 4, 2011). | |
21.1* | List of subsidiaries of registrant. | |
23.1* | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. | |
31.1* | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2* | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of . | |
73
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* Filed herewith.
(b) Exhibits
The exhibits to this report are listed in section (a)(3) of Item 15 above.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
74
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: | April 2, 2013 | EXPRESS, INC. | |
By: | /s/ D. Paul Dascoli | ||
D. Paul Dascoli | |||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Michael A. Weiss |
Michael A. Weiss, President, Chief Executive | |||
Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director | |||
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ D. Paul Dascoli |
D. Paul Dascoli, Senior Vice President, | |||
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |||
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | |||
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Michael G. Archbold |
Michael G. Archbold, Director | |||
Date: | April 3, 2013 | By: | /s/ Sona Chawla |
Sona Chawla, Director | |||
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Michael F. Devine |
Michael F. Devine, III, Director | |||
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Theo Killion |
Theo Killion, Director | |||
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Mylle H. Mangum |
Mylle H. Mangum, Director | |||
Date: | April 2, 2013 | By: | /s/ Peter S. Swinburn |
Peter S. Swinburn, Director | |||
75