FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 0-23081

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (407) 333-9911

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    Yes  ¨     No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨                    Accelerated filer  þ                    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 30, 2007, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $428 million (based on the last sale on such date on the NASDAQ Global Market).

As of March 5, 2008, there were outstanding 16,662,004 shares of the Registrant’s common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Parts II and III of this Report.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

FARO Technologies, Inc. (“FARO”, the “Company”, “us”, “we”, or “our”) has made “forward-looking statements” in this report (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Statements that are not historical facts or that describe our plans, beliefs, goals, intentions, objectives, projections, expectations, assumptions, strategies, or future events are forward-looking statements. In addition, words such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “plan,” “should,” “could,” “seek,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “goal,” “objective,” “project,” “forecast,” “target” and similar words, or discussions of our strategy or other intentions identify forward-looking statements. Other written or oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements also may be made by the Company from time to time.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Consequently, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. The Company does not intend to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law. Important factors that could cause a material difference in the actual results from those contemplated in such forward-looking statements include, among others, and those elsewhere in this report and the following:

1

Table of Contents

The Company designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports portable, software driven, 3-D measurement systems that are used in a broad range of manufacturing, industrial, building construction and forensic applications. The Company’s FaroArm, FARO Scan Arm and FARO Gage articulated measuring devices, the FARO Laser Scanner LS, the FARO Laser Tracker, and their companion CAM2 software, provide for Computer-Aided Design (“CAD”)-based inspection and/or factory-level statistical process control and high-density surveying. Together, these products integrate the measurement, quality inspection, and reverse engineering functions with CAD software to improve productivity, enhance product quality and decrease rework and scrap in the manufacturing process. The Company uses the acronym “CAM2” for this process, which stands for computer-aided measurement. As of December 2007, our products have been purchased by approximately 7,400 customers worldwide, ranging from small machine shops to such large manufacturing and industrial companies as Audi, Bell Helicopter, Boeing, British Aerospace, Caterpillar, Daimler Chrysler, General Electric, General Motors, Honda, Johnson Controls, Komatsu Dresser, Lockheed Martin, Nissan, Siemens and Volkswagen, among many others.

2

Table of Contents

The Company was founded in 1982 and re-incorporated in Florida in 1992. The Company’s worldwide headquarters are located at 125 Technology Park, Lake Mary, Florida 32746, and its telephone number is (407) 333-9911.

Industry Background

The Company believes that there are four principal forces driving the need for its products and services: 1) the widespread use by manufacturers of CAD in product development which shortens product cycles; 2) the adoption by manufacturers of quality standards such as Six Sigma and ISO-9000 (and its offshoot QS-9000), which stress the measurement of every step in a manufacturing process to reduce or eliminate defects, 3) the inability of traditional measurement devices to address many manufacturing problems such as throughput, efficiency, and accuracy, especially those related to large components for products such as automobiles, aircraft, heavy duty construction equipment, and factory retrofits, and 4) the growing demand to capture large volumes of three-dimensional data for modeling and analysis.

CAD changes the manufacturing process. The creation of physical products involves the processes of design, engineering, production and measurement and quality inspection. These basic processes have been profoundly affected by the computer hardware and software revolution that began in the 1980s. CAD software was developed to automate the design process, providing manufacturers with computerized 3-D design capability. Today, most manufacturers use some form of CAD software to create designs and engineering specifications for new products and to quantify and modify designs and specifications for existing products. The use of CAD can shorten the time between design changes. While manufacturers previously designed their products to be in production for longer periods of time, current manufacturing practices must accommodate more frequent product introductions and modifications, while satisfying more stringent quality and safety standards. Assembly fixtures and measurement tools must be linked to the CAD design to enable production to keep up with the rate of design change.

Quality standards dictate measurement to reduce defects. QS-9000 is the name given to the Quality System Requirements of the automotive industry that were developed by Chrysler, Ford, General Motors and major truck manufacturers and issued in late 1994. Companies that become registered under QS-9000 are considered to have higher standards and better quality products. Six Sigma embodies the principles of total quality management that focus on measuring results and reducing product or service failure rates to 3.4 per million. All aspects of a Six Sigma company’s infrastructure must be analyzed, and if necessary, restructured to increase revenues and raise customer satisfaction levels. The all-encompassing nature of these and other quality standards has resulted in manufacturers measuring every aspect of their process, including stages of product assembly that may never have been measured before, in part because of the lack of suitable measurement equipment.

Traditional products do not measure up. A significant aspect of the manufacturing process, which traditionally has not benefited from computer-aided technology, is measurement and quality inspection. Historically, manufacturers have measured and inspected products using hand-measurement tools such as scales, calipers, micrometers and plumb lines for simple measuring tasks, test (or check) fixtures for certain large manufactured products and traditional coordinate measurement machines (“CMM”) for objects that require higher precision measurement. However, the broader utility of each of these measurement methods is limited.

Although hand-measurement tools are often appropriate for simple geometric measurements, including hole diameters or length and width of a rectangular component, their use for complex part measurements, such as the fender of a car, is limited. Also these devices do not allow for the measurements to be directly compared to the CAD model of the part. Test fixtures (customized fixed tools used to make comparative measurements of complex production parts to “master parts”) are relatively expensive and must be reworked or discarded each time a dimensional change is made in the part being measured. In addition, these manual measuring devices do not permit the manufacturer to compare the dimensions of an object with its CAD model.

3

Table of Contents

Conventional CMMs are generally large, fixed-base machines that provide very high levels of precision and provide a link to the CAD model of the object being measured. However, fixed-base CMMs require the object being measured be brought to the CMM and the object fit within the CMMs measurement grid. As manufactured subassemblies increase in size and become integrated into even larger assemblies, they become less transportable, thus diminishing the utility of a conventional CMM. Consequently, manufacturers must continue to use hand-measuring tools, or expensive customized test fixtures, in order to measure large or unconventionally shaped objects. Some parts or assemblies are not easily accessible and cannot be measured at all using traditional devices.

Conventional surveying equipment is limited to single-point measurements and does not have the capacity to capture and analyze large volumes of three-dimensional data. As data requirements for construction, civil engineering and forensic inspection projects become more complex, single-point measurement devices will become increasingly more difficult to utilize in those applications.

Escalating global competition has created a demand for higher quality products with shorter life cycles. Customers require more rapid design, greater control of the manufacturing process, tools to compare components to their CAD specifications and the ability to precisely measure components that cannot be measured or inspected by conventional devices, and the ability to capture and analyze large volumes of three-dimensional data. Moreover, they increasingly require measurement capabilities to be integrated into manufacturing processes and to be available on the factory floor.

FARO Products

The FaroArm. The FaroArm is a combination of a portable, six or seven-axis, instrumented articulated measurement arm, a computer, and software programs under the acronym CAM2.

The Faro Scan Arm. The Faro Scan Arm is a FaroArm equipped with a combination of a hard probe (like that in the Faro Arm) and a non-contact line laser probe. This product provides our customers the ability to measure their products without touching them and offers a seven-axis contact/non-contact measurement device with a fully integrated laser scanner. The Scan Arm is used for non-contact measurement applications, including inspection, cloud-to-CAD comparison, rapid prototyping, reverse engineering and 3-D modeling.

The FARO Gage. Sold as a combination of an articulated arm device with a computer and software, the FARO Gage is a smaller, higher accuracy version of the FaroArm product. What distinguishes the FARO Gage from the FaroArm are the special mounting features and the basic software which are unique to the FARO Gage. The FARO Gage is targeted at machine tools, and bench tops around machine tools, where basic measurements of smaller machined parts must be measured. As such, the CAM2 software developed for this device features basic 2-D and 3-D measurements common to these applications. (See also “FARO Gage Software” below.)

4

Table of Contents

The FARO Laser Tracker. A combination of a portable, large-volume laser measurement tool, a computer, and CAM2 software programs.

The FARO Laser Scanner LS. The FARO Laser Scanner LS utilizes laser technology to measure and collect a cloud of data points, allowing for the detailed and precise three-dimensional rendering of an object or an area as large as a factory. This technology is currently used for factory planning, facility life-cycle management, quality control, forensic analysis and in general, capturing large volumes of three-dimensional data. Laser scanning technology simplifies modeling, reduces project time and maintains or increases the accuracy of the image. The resulting data is used with major CAD systems or FARO’s own proprietary software for the applications listed above.

CAM2 Software. CAM2 is the Company’s family of proprietary CAD-based measurement and statistical process control software. The CAM2 product line includes the following software programs, many of which are translated into multiple languages:

5

Table of Contents

Customers

As of December 2007, the Company’s products have been purchased by approximately 7,400 customers worldwide, including small machine shops, large manufacturing and industrial companies, universities and law enforcement agencies. The Company’s ten largest customers by revenue represented an aggregate of 5.8% of the Company’s total revenues in 2007. No customer represented more than 2.0% of the Company’s sales in 2007.

Sales and Marketing

The Company directs its sales and marketing efforts on a decentralized basis in three main regions around the world: Americas, Europe/Africa and Asia/Pacific. The regional headquarters for the Americas is located in the Company’s headquarters in Lake Mary, Florida; the Europe/Africa regional headquarters is located in Stuttgart, Germany; and the regional headquarters for the Asia/Pacific region is located in Singapore. At December 31, 2007 the Company employed 118, 123, and 80 sales and marketing specialists in the Americas, Europe/Africa, and Asia/Pacific regions, respectively. The Company has direct sales representation in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, Poland, Netherlands, India, China, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Japan. See Footnote 19 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, incorporated herein by reference to Item 8 hereof, for financial information about the Company’s foreign and domestic operations and export sales required by this Item.

The Company uses a process of integrated lead qualification and sales demonstration. Once a customer opportunity is identified, the Company employs a team-based sales approach involving inside and outside sales personnel who are supported by application engineers. Each product has a separate sales force who report to regional sales managers for all products. The Company employs a variety of marketing techniques to promote brand awareness and customer identification.

Research and Development

The Company believes that its future success depends on its ability to maintain technological leadership, which will require ongoing enhancements of its products and the development of new applications and products that provide 3-D measurement solutions. Accordingly, the Company intends to continue to make substantial investments in the development of new technologies, the commercialization of new products that build on the Company’s existing technological base, and the enhancement and development of additional applications for its products.

The Company’s research and development efforts are directed primarily at enhancing the functional adaptability of its current products and developing new and innovative products that respond to specific requirements of the emerging market for 3-D measurement systems. The Company’s research and development efforts have been devoted primarily to mechanical hardware, electronics and software. The Company’s engineering development efforts will continue to focus on enhancing our existing products and developing new products for the CAM2 market.

At December 31, 2007, the Company employed 67 scientists and technicians in its research and development efforts. Research and development expenses were approximately $10.3 million in 2007 compared to $7.2 million in 2006 and $6.4 million in 2005. The Company believes that the continual development or acquisition of innovative new products is critical to its future success. The field of CAM2 and more broadly, 3-D measurement, continues to expand and new technologies and applications will be essential to competing in this market. Research and development activities, especially with respect to new products and technologies, are subject to significant risks, and there can be no assurance that any of the Company’s research and development activities will be completed successfully or on schedule, or, if so completed, will be commercially accepted.

Intellectual Property

The Company holds or has pending 74 patents in the United States and related patents worldwide. The Company also has 27 registered or pending trademarks in the United States and worldwide.

6

Table of Contents

The Company relies on a combination of contractual provisions and trade secret laws to protect its proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company to protect its trade secrets and proprietary information will be sufficient to prevent misappropriation of its proprietary information or preclude third-party development of similar intellectual property.

Despite the Company’s efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of the Company’s products or to obtain and use information that the Company regards as proprietary. The Company intends to vigorously defend its proprietary rights against infringement by third parties. However, policing unauthorized use of the Company’s products is difficult, particularly overseas, and the Company is unable to determine the extent to which piracy of its software products exists. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company’s proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

The Company does not believe that any of its products infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties. There can be no assurance, however, that third parties will not claim infringement by the Company with respect to current or future products. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require the Company to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at all, which could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Manufacturing and Assembly

The Company manufactures its FaroArm, FARO Gage, and FARO Laser Tracker products in the Company’s manufacturing facilities located in Florida and Pennsylvania for customer orders from the Americas, in its manufacturing facility located in Switzerland for customer orders from the Europe/Africa region, and in its manufacturing facility located in Singapore for customer orders from the Asia/Pacific region. The Company manufactures its FARO Laser Scanner LS product in its facility located in Stuttgart, Germany. The Company expects all its existing plants to have the production capacity necessary to support its growth through 2008.

Manufacturing consists primarily of assembling components and subassemblies, purchased from suppliers, into finished products. The primary components, which include machined parts and electronic circuit boards, are produced by subcontractors according to the Company’s specifications. All products are assembled, calibrated and tested for accuracy and functionality before shipment. The Company performs limited in-house circuit board assembly and component part machining.

The Company’s manufacturing, engineering, and design headquarters have been registered to the ISO-9001 standard since July 1998. Semi-annual surveillance audits have documented continuous improvement to this multinational standard. The Company continues to examine its scope of registration as the business evolves and has chosen English as the standard business language for its operations. This decision is expected to significantly influence the Company’s operations and documentation globally.

This has been done in concert with the ISO9001:2000 Quality Management System Certification, and is expected to increase customer confidence in the Company’s processes, products and services worldwide. Additionally, the Company takes a global approach to ISO17025:2005 Calibration Laboratory recognition, seeking to have all locations registered with identical scopes of accreditation and capabilities for the products generated and serviced.

Currently the Company’s manufacturing sites in Lake Mary, Kennett Square, Stuttgart, Schaffhausen and Singapore are jointly registered to ISO-9001 and ISO17025. In addition, its service sites in the United States, Germany, India, Japan, China, Singapore and Brazil also have joint certification and accreditation to these key standards.

7

Table of Contents

Competition

The Company’s portable measurement systems compete in the broad market for measurement devices for manufacturing and industrial applications which, in addition to portable articulated arms, laser tracker and laser scanner products, consist of fixed-base CMMs, templates and go/no-go gages, check fixtures, handheld measurement tools, and various categories of surveying equipment. The broad market for measurement devices is highly competitive. In the Faro Gage product line, the Company competes with manufacturers of handheld measurement tools and fixed-base CMMs, including some large, well-established companies. In the Faro Arm, Faro Scan Arm, Faro Laser Tracker, and Faro Laser Scanner LS product lines, the Company competes primarily with Hexagon Metrology, a division of Hexagon. The Company also competes in these product lines with a number of other smaller competitors.

The Company will be required to make continued investments in technology and product development to maintain the technological advantage that it believes it currently has over its competition. Some of the Company’s competitors, including some manufacturers of fixed based CMMs and Hexagon, possess substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than it possesses. Moreover, the Company cannot be certain that its technology or its product development efforts will allow it to successfully compete as the industry evolves. As the market for the Company’s portable measurement systems expands, additional competition may emerge and the Company’s existing and future competitors may commit more resources to the markets in which the Company participates.

Government Regulation

The Company’s operations are subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations, including those governing antitrust and competition, the environment, securities transactions and disclosures, import and export of products, currency conversions and repatriation, taxation of foreign earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel and use of local employees and suppliers. The Company’s foreign operations are subject to the U.S. FCPA, which makes illegal any payments to foreign officials or employees of foreign governments that are intended to induce them to use their influence to assist the Company or to gain any improper advantage for the Company. The Company operates in certain regions that are more highly prone to risk under the FCPA.

Manufacturers of electrical goods have become subject to the European Union’s RoHS and WEEE directives, which took effect during 2006. Parallel initiatives are being proposed in other jurisdictions, including several states in the United States and China. RoHS prohibits the use of lead, mercury and certain other specified substances in electronics products, and WEEE makes producers of electrical goods financially responsible for specified collection, recycling, treatment, and disposal of covered electronic products and components.

The Company expects that it will have its products in compliance with the RoHS directive in time. However, if the Company is unable to do so, it would be unable to sell its products in European Union countries, as well as possible several states in the United States and China, which would have a material adverse effect on its sales and results of operation.

Backlog

At December 31, 2007, the Company had orders representing approximately $19.1 million in product sales outstanding. The majority of these specific orders were shipped by February 20, 2008, and, as of February 20, 2008, the Company had orders representing approximately $13.0 million in product sales outstanding. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had orders representing approximately $10.3 million and $7.3 million in product sales outstanding, respectively.

The Company’s increase in backlog at December 31, 2007 is consistent with the Company’s overall sales growth and includes planned customer delivery dates in early 2008. The Company believes that substantially all of the outstanding sales orders as of February 20, 2008 will be shipped during 2008.

8

Table of Contents

Employees

At December 31, 2007, the Company had 780 full-time employees, consisting of 321 sales and marketing professionals, 144 production staff, 67 research and development staff, 112 administrative staff, and 136 customer service/application engineering specialists. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and believes its employee relations are good. Management believes that its future growth and success will depend in part on its ability to retain and continue to attract highly skilled personnel. The Company anticipates that it will be able to obtain the additional personnel required to satisfy its staffing requirements over the foreseeable future.

Geographic Information

The information regarding net sales, operating income, and long-lived assets set forth in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements is hereby incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 1.

Available Information

The Company maintains a web site with the address www.faro.com. Information contained on its web site is not a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company makes available free of charge through its web site its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files these reports with, or furnishes these reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Company discusses expectations regarding its future performance and makes other forward-looking statements in its annual and quarterly reports, press releases and other written and oral statements. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data and its operating plans. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Consequently, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. They are inherently uncertain, and investors must recognize that events could turn out to be significantly different from the Company’s expectations. The following discussion of risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, some important factors to consider when evaluating the Company’s trends and future results.

The Company’s customers’ buying process for its products is highly decentralized, and therefore, it typically requires significant time and expense for the Company to further penetrate the potential market of a specific customer, which may delay its ability to generate additional revenue.

The Company’s success will depend, in part, on its ability to further penetrate its customer base. During 2007, 48.0% of the Company’s revenue was attributable to sales to its existing customers, compared to 45.1% in 2006. If the Company is not able to continue to penetrate its existing customer base, its sales growth will be impaired. Most of its customers have a decentralized buying process for measurement devices. Thus, the Company must spend significant time and resources to increase revenues from a specific customer. For example, the Company may provide products to only one of its customer’s manufacturing facilities or for a specific product line within a manufacturing facility. The Company cannot be certain that it will be able to maintain or increase the amount of sales to its existing customers.

9

Table of Contents

Others may develop products that make the Company’s products obsolete or less competitive.

The CAM2 market is emerging and could be characterized by rapid technological change. Others may develop new or improved products, processes or technologies that may make the Company’s products obsolete or less competitive. The Company cannot assure you that it will be able to adapt to evolving markets and technologies or maintain its technological advantage.

The Company’s success will depend, in part, on its ability to maintain its technological advantage by developing new products and applications and enhancing its existing products. Developing new products and applications and enhancing its existing products can be complex and time-consuming and will require substantial investment by the Company. Significant delays in new product releases or difficulties in developing new products could adversely affect the Company’s revenues and results of operations. Because its customers are concentrated in a few industries, a reduction in sales to any one of these industries could cause a significant decline in the Company’s revenues.

An economic slowdown in manufacturing will affect the Company’s growth and profitability.

A significant portion of the Company’s sales are to manufacturers in the automotive, aerospace and heavy equipment industries. The Company is dependent upon the continued growth, viability and financial stability of its customers in these industries, which are highly cyclical and dependent upon the general health of the economy and consumer spending. The cyclical nature of these industries may exert significant influence on the Company’s revenues and results of operations. In addition, the volume of orders from its customers and the prices of its products may be adversely impacted by decreases in capital spending by a significant portion of its customers during recessionary periods. If one or more of its significant customers were to become insolvent or otherwise were unable to pay for the products provided by the Company, its operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

The Company’s inability to protect its patents and proprietary rights in the United States and foreign countries could adversely affect its revenues.

The Company’s success depends in large part on its ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary right protection for its processes and products in the United States and other countries. The Company also relies upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing inventions to maintain its competitive position. The Company seeks to protect its technology and trade secrets, in part, by confidentiality agreements with its employees and contractors. The Company’s employees may breach these agreements or the Company’s trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by inventors. If the Company is unable to obtain or maintain protection of its patents, trade secrets and other proprietary rights, it may not be able to prevent third parties from using its proprietary rights.

The Company’s patent protection involves complex legal and technical questions. Its patents may be challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented. The Company may be able to protect its proprietary rights from infringement by third parties only to the extent that its proprietary processes and products are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around the Company’s patented technologies. Litigation or other proceedings to defend or enforce its intellectual property rights could require the Company to spend significant time and money and could otherwise adversely affect its business.

Claims from others that the Company infringes their intellectual property rights may adversely affect its operations.

From time to time the Company receives notices from others claiming it infringes their intellectual property rights. The number of these claims may grow. Responding to these claims may require the Company to enter into royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, require it to stop selling or to redesign affected products or require it to pay damages. Any litigation or interference proceedings, regardless of their outcome, may be costly and may require significant time and attention of the Company’s management and technical personnel.

10

Table of Contents

Potential product failures or product availability and performance issues could result in lost sales, loss of customers and possible delays in new product introductions and enhancements and increased warranty costs.

The Company has a history of new product introductions and enhancements to existing products. Potential product failures in new or existing products of the Company could result in delays in new product introductions, which could lead to a loss of sales, and increased warranty costs.

The Company may not be able to achieve financial results within its target goals, and its operating results may fluctuate due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control.

The Company’s ability to achieve financial results that are within its goals is subject to a number of factors, some of which are beyond its control. Moreover, the Company’s annual and quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past and likely will vary significantly in the future. Factors that cause the Company’s financial results to fluctuate include those set forth elsewhere in this report and the following:

11

Table of Contents

Any one or a combination of these factors could adversely affect the Company’s annual and quarterly operating results in the future and could cause it to fail to achieve its target financial results.

The CAM2 market is an emerging market and the Company’s growth depends on the ability of the Company’s products to attain broad market acceptance.

The market for traditional fixed-base CMMs, check fixtures, handheld measurement tools, and surveying equipment is mature. Part of the Company’s strategy is to continue to displace these traditional measurement devices. Displacing traditional measurement devices and achieving broad market acceptance of the Company’s products requires significant effort to convince manufacturers to reevaluate their historical measurement procedures and methodologies.

Because the CAM2 market is emerging, the potential size and growth rate of the CAM2 market is uncertain and difficult to quantify. If the CAM2 market does not continue to expand or does not expand at least as quickly as the Company anticipates, it may not be able to continue its sales growth, which also may affect its profitability.

The Company markets five closely interdependent products (FaroArm, Scan Arm, FARO Laser Scanner LS, FARO Laser Tracker and FARO Gage) and related software for use in measurement, inspection, and high density surveying applications. Substantially all of the Company’s revenues are currently derived from sales of these products and software and it plans to continue its business strategy of focusing on the portable software-driven, 3-D measurement and inspection market. Consequently, the Company’s financial performance will depend in large part on portable, computer-based measurement, inspection, and high density surveying products achieving broad market acceptance. If its products cannot attain broad market acceptance, the Company will not grow as anticipated and may be required to make increased expenditures on research and development for new applications or new products.

The Company competes with manufacturers of portable measurement systems and traditional measurement devices, many of which have more resources than the Company and may develop new products and technologies.

The broad market for measurement devices is highly competitive. In the FARO Gage product line, the Company competes with manufacturers of handheld measurement tools and fixed-base CMMs, including some large, well-established companies. In the FaroArm, FARO Scan Arm, FARO Laser Tracker, and FARO Laser Scanner LS product lines, the Company competes primarily with Hexagon Metrology, a division of Hexagon. The Company also competes in these product lines with a number of other smaller competitors.

The Company will be required to make continued investments in technology and product development to maintain the technological advantage that it believes it currently has over its competition. Some of its competitors, including some manufacturers of fixed based CMMs and Hexagon, possess substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than it possesses. Moreover, the Company cannot be certain that its technology or its product development efforts will allow it to successfully compete as the industry evolves. As the market for its portable measurement systems expands, additional competition may emerge and the Company’s existing and future competitors may commit more resources to the markets in which the Company participates.

The Company derives a substantial part of its revenues from its international operations, which are subject to greater volatility and often require more management time and expense to achieve profitability than its domestic operations.

Since 2000, the Company has derived approximately half of its sales from international operations. In the Company’s experience, entry into new international markets requires considerable management time as well as start-up expenses for market development, hiring and establishing office facilities before any significant revenues are generated. As a result, initial operations in a new market may operate at low margins or may be unprofitable.

12

Table of Contents

The Company’s international operations are subject to various risks, including:

The Company’s foreign subsidiaries maintain their financial records and statements in their respective local currencies and the Company’s consolidated financial results are affected by foreign currency translation adjustments. Moreover, several of the countries where the Company operates have emerging or developing economies, which may be subject to greater currency volatility, negative growth, high inflation, limited availability of foreign exchange and other risks. These factors may harm the Company’s results of operations and any measures that it may implement to reduce the effect of volatile currencies and other risks of its international operations may not be effective.

The Company has not finally resolved the FCPA matter with the DOJ and the SEC.

As previously reported on the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 15, 2006, the Company learned that its China subsidiary had made payments to certain customers in China that may have violated the FCPA and other applicable laws. The Company has engaged in settlement discussions with both the SEC and the DOJ concerning the FCPA matter and has determined that the settlement discussions are likely to result in a resolution that will include a fine and disgorgement of associated profits. The Company recorded in the third quarter of 2007 a reserve of $2.65 million in anticipation of the amount that could be necessary to satisfy its financial obligations to the SEC and the DOJ in resolving this matter. However, there is no assurance that such discussions will result in a resolution of the FCPA matter. Predicting at this time when the FCPA matter will be finally resolved with the SEC and the DOJ is not possible.

The monetary sanctions ultimately paid by the Company to the SEC and DOJ in resolving this matter, whether imposed on the Company or agreed to by settlement, may exceed the amount that has been reserved by the Company. In addition, the ultimate costs of the Company’s continuing monitoring obligations in respect of the FCPA matter are uncertain and may vary from the Company’s preliminary estimates of such amount as a result of a number of factors, including without limitation the fact that neither the scope of the monitoring obligation nor the identity of outside monitoring firm have been determined.

The Company may not be able to identify, consummate or achieve expected benefits from acquisitions.

The Company has completed three significant acquisitions since its initial public offering in 1997. The Company may pursue access to additional technologies, complementary product lines and sales channels through selective acquisitions and strategic investments. The Company may not be able to identify and successfully negotiate suitable acquisitions, obtain financing for future acquisitions on satisfactory terms or otherwise complete acquisitions in the future. In the past the Company has used its stock as consideration for acquisitions. The Company’s common stock may not remain at a price at which it can be used as consideration for acquisitions without diluting its existing shareholders, and potential acquisition candidates may not view its stock attractively.

13

Table of Contents

Realization of the benefits of acquisitions often requires integration of some or all of the sales and marketing, distribution, manufacturing, engineering, finance and administrative organizations of the acquired companies. The integration of acquisitions demands substantial attention from senior management and the management of the acquired companies. Any acquisition may be subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties including:

The Company cannot assure you that it will be able to integrate successfully any acquisitions, that any acquired companies will operate profitably or that it will realize the expected benefits from any acquisition.

The Company may face difficulties managing growth.

If its business continues to grow rapidly in the future, the Company expects it to result in:

If the Company is not able to manage future growth, its business, financial condition and operating results may be harmed.

The Company’s dependence on suppliers for materials could impair its ability to manufacture its products.

Outside vendors provide key components used by the Company in the manufacture of its products. Although the Company believes that alternative sources for these components are available, any supply interruption in a limited source component would harm its ability to manufacture its products until a new source of supply is identified. In addition, an uncorrected defect or supplier’s variation in a component, either known or unknown to the Company, or incompatible with its manufacturing processes, could harm its ability to manufacture its products. The Company may not be able to find a sufficient alternative supplier in a reasonable period, or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If the Company fails to obtain a supplier for the manufacture of components of its potential products, it may experience delays or interruptions in its operations, which would adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s failure to attract and retain qualified personnel could lead to a loss of sales or decreased profitability or growth. Required compensation levels including equity based compensation to attract and retain personnel could result in increased compensation expense.

The Company may not be able to attract and retain enough qualified personnel to support its growth. In addition, the loss of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer, or Chief Financial Officer, or other key personnel could adversely effect its sales, profitability, or growth. Moreover, the Company continues to rely in part on equity awards to attract and retain qualified personnel. Because of new accounting regulations requiring the expensing of stock options, if the Company continues to rely on equity compensation to attract and retain qualified personnel, its compensation expenses may increase.

14

Table of Contents

The Company may experience volatility in its stock price.

The price of the Company’s common stock has been, and may continue to be, highly volatile in response to various factors, many of which are beyond its control, including:

The market price of the Company’s common stock may also be affected by its inability to meet analyst and investor expectations and failure to achieve projected financial results. Any failure to meet such expectations or projected financial results, even if minor, could cause the market price of the Company’s common stock to decline. Volatility in its stock price may result in your inability to sell your shares at or above the price at which you purchased them.

In addition, stock markets have generally experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of equity securities of many companies have experienced wide price fluctuations not necessarily related to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock. In the past, securities class action lawsuits frequently have been instituted against such companies following periods of volatility in the market price of such companies’ securities. If any such litigation is instigated against the Company, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Anti-takeover provisions in the Company’s articles of incorporation, its bylaws and provisions of Florida law could delay or prevent a change of control that you may favor.

The Company’s articles of incorporation, its bylaws and provisions of Florida law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire the Company, even if doing so would be beneficial to you. These provisions could discourage potential takeover attempts and could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s shares. Because of these provisions, you might not be able to receive a premium on your investment. These provisions include:

The provisions described above could delay or make more difficult transactions involving a change in control of the Company, or its management.

The Company had no comments from the Securities and Exchange Commission staff regarding the Company’s periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that were unresolved as of the date of filing of this report.

15

Table of Contents

The Americas

The Company’s headquarters are located in a leased building in Lake Mary, Florida containing approximately 35,000 square feet. This facility houses the Company’s U.S. production, research and development, administrative staff and customer service/application operations. The Company’s U.S. sales and marketing headquarters is in a leased building in Lake Mary, Florida consisting of approximately 8,200 square feet. In October 2007, the Company leased a building in Lake Mary consisting of approximately 46,000 square feet to provide for consolidation of its sales, marketing, and administrative staff and expansion of its existing production operations. Additionally, the Company has a leased facility consisting of two buildings totaling approximately 37,000 square feet located in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania containing research and development, manufacturing and service operations of the laser tracker product lines.

Europe/Africa

The Company’s European headquarters are located in a leased building in Stuttgart, Germany containing approximately 62,000 square feet. This facility houses the manufacturing, administration, sales, marketing and service management personnel for the Company’s European operations. Additionally the Company has a leased facility consisting of approximately 16,000 square feet located in Schaffhausen, Switzerland containing manufacturing operations for the Company’s products, which are shipped to customers in Europe, Africa and Asia.

Asia/Pacific

The Company’s Asian headquarters are located in a leased building in Singapore containing approximately 22,000 square feet. This facility houses the administration, sales, marketing, production and service management personnel for the Company’s Asian operations. The Company’s Japan headquarters are located in a leased building in Nagoya, Japan containing approximately 5,000 square feet. This facility houses the Company’s Japan sales, marketing and service operations. The Company’s China headquarters are located in a leased building in Shanghai, China containing approximately 11,000 square feet for sales, marketing and service operations.

The Company believes that its current facilities will be adequate for its foreseeable needs and that it will be able to locate suitable space for additional regional offices or enhanced production needs as necessary.

The information required by the remainder of this item is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto.

Securities Litigation—On December 6, 2005, the first of four essentially identical class action securities fraud lawsuits were filed against the Company and certain officers of the Company (the “Securities Litigation”) in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. On April 19, 2006, the four lawsuits were consolidated, and Kornitzer Capital Management, Inc. (the “Lead Plaintiff”) was appointed as the lead plaintiff. On May 16, 2006, the Lead Plaintiff filed its Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint against the Company and the individual defendants (the “Amended Complaint”). On February 3, 2007, the Court dismissed the Amended Complaint, without prejudice. On February 22, 2007, the Lead Plaintiff filed its Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Second Amended Complaint”) against the Company and the individual defendants.

In the Second Amended Complaint, as in the Amended Complaint, the Lead Plaintiff seeks to include in the class all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s common stock between April 15, 2004 and March 15, 2006 (the “Class”), and seeks an unspecified amount of damages, premised on allegations that each

16

Table of Contents

defendant made misrepresentations and omissions of material fact during the class period in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, the Lead Plaintiff alleges that the Company’s reported inventory, gross margins and profits were false and misleading during a portion of the class period because the Company consciously overstated the value of its inventory; that the Company misstated during 2005 certain of the selling expenses it had accrued and had expected to incur; that certain Asian sales that the Company had reported during the class period had been the product of unlawful payments made in violation of the FCPA, and that the Company failed to disclose that it was utilizing unlawful means to achieve such sales; and that certain of the Company’s statements regarding the Company’s systems of internal controls had been false and misleading, in light of the above and other circumstances.

On February 26, 2008, the parties to the Securities Litigation entered into a Memorandum of Understanding stating the principal terms of their agreement to settle the Securities Litigation. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, which is subject to certain conditions, the parties to the Securities Litigation will prepare and file a detailed Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with the court seeking the court’s preliminary and final approval of the terms of the proposed settlement. Pursuant to those terms, the issuer of the Company’s Executive Liability and Entity Securities Liability insurance policy applicable to the Securities Litigation will pay $6.875 million into a settlement fund for the Securities Litigation. That sum is within the coverage limit of the policy.

The proceeds of the settlement fund will be distributed to members of the Class and to the Lead Plaintiff’s counsel. The balance of the settlement fund will be used to pay various costs associated with providing notice of the terms of the proposed settlement to the Class and with administering the settlement. If the court approves the settlement, a judgment will be entered dismissing the Securities Litigation, with prejudice, as against each defendant.

Derivative Action—On January 10, 2008, a Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the “Derivative Complaint”) was filed by an alleged shareholder of the Company in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against six of the Company’s current and former directors, as defendants, and against the Company, as a nominal defendant. The Derivative Complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty and other claims against the individual defendants principally in connection with the alleged acts and omissions asserted in the Securities Litigation. The plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants caused the Company’s stock price to be falsely inflated, and subjected the Company to costs, fines and other damages, as well as a loss of goodwill. The plaintiff purports to seek an unspecified amount of damages, together with other relief, on behalf of the Company and against the individual defendants. Prior to filing the Derivative Complaint, the plaintiff had requested that the Company assert certain of such claims against some of the individual defendants. In February 2008, the Company received another demand by another alleged shareholder that the Company assert substantially the same claims as set forth in the Derivative Complaint against seven of the Company’s current and former directors.

The Company has formed a committee of independent directors to review and investigate the shareholder demands and the allegations made in the Derivative Complaint and the other shareholder demand. The committee has not yet made a recommendation with respect to those matters. To the Company’s knowledge, no defendant has been served with the Derivative Complaint.

Voluntary Disclosure of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Matter to the Securities and Exchange Commissions and Department of Justice—As previously reported by the Company, the Company learned that its China subsidiary had made payments to certain customers in China that may have violated the FCPA and other applicable laws. The Company’s Audit Committee instituted an internal investigation into this matter in February 2006, and the Company voluntarily notified the SEC and the DOJ of this matter in March 2006. The Company’s internal investigation into this matter has been completed. The Company’s internal investigation identified certain improper payments made in China and deficiencies in its controls with respect to its operations in China in possible violation of the FCPA.

17

Table of Contents

Results of the investigation revealed that referral fee payments in possible violation of the FCPA were $165,000 and $265,000 in 2004 and 2005, respectively, which were recorded in selling expenses in its statements of income. The related sales to customers to which payment of these referral fees had been made totaled approximately $1.3 million and $3.24 million in 2004 and 2005, respectively. Additional improper referral fee payments of $122,000 were made in January and February 2006 related to sales contracts in 2005. The Company had sales in China of $9.0 million in 2005 and $4.2 million in 2004, approximately 7% and 4% of total sales, respectively. The Company incurred expenses of $3.8 million in 2006 and $3.1 million in 2007, relating to the FCPA matter, including $2.65 million for estimated fines and penalties to the DOJ and SEC.

The Company has provided to the SEC and the DOJ information obtained during the course of this investigation and is cooperating with both agencies. The SEC and the DOJ have a broad range of civil and criminal remedies that they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals in appropriate circumstances, including without limitation disgorgement, fines, penalties, and other injunctive and equitable relief, as well as additional changes to the Company’s business practices and compliance programs.

The Company has engaged in settlement discussions with both the SEC and the DOJ concerning the FCPA matter. Although there is no assurance that such discussions will result in a resolution of the FCPA matter, the Company has determined that the settlement discussions are likely to result in a resolution that will include a fine and disgorgement of associated profits. The Company recorded in the third quarter of 2007 a reserve of $2.65 million in anticipation of the amount that could be necessary to satisfy its financial obligations to the SEC and the DOJ in resolving this matter. Predicting at this time when the FCPA matter will be finally resolved with the SEC and the DOJ is not possible. The monetary sanctions ultimately paid by the Company to the SEC and the DOJ in resolving this matter, whether imposed on the Company or agreed to by settlement, may exceed the amount that has been reserved by the Company.

The Company anticipates that resolution of the matter will not result in formal criminal charges being filed against it by the DOJ. The Company expects that as part of the final resolution of the FCPA matter with the SEC and the DOJ, in addition to monetary sanctions, the Company will have continuing obligations with the SEC and the DOJ with respect to monitoring, compliance with the FCPA and other laws, full cooperation with the government, and the adoption of a compliance code containing specific provisions intended to prevent violations of the FCPA. The Company expects that the failure to comply with any such continuing obligations could result in the SEC and the DOJ seeking to impose penalties against the Company in the future.

The Company terminated, in March 2006, certain personnel in the Asia-Pacific Region and re-assigned the duties of other personnel in both the Asia-Pacific Region and the U.S. as a result of the internal investigation. Additionally, the Company instituted the following remedial measures:

18

Table of Contents

Other than the litigation mentioned above, the Company is not involved in any other legal proceedings other than routine litigation arising in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe the results of such litigation would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

19

Table of Contents

PART II

The Company’s common stock is listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Market.

The following table sets forth, for the calendar points indicated, the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market:

The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock to date. The Company expects to retain future earnings for use in operating and expanding its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the reasonably foreseeable future.

As of March 5, 2008, the last sale price of the Company’s common stock was $32.37, and there were 73 holders of record of common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, no equity securities of the Company were sold by the Company that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

20

Table of Contents

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following line graph compares the cumulative five-year Common Stock returns with the cumulative returns of the Dow Jones U.S. Total Market Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Electronic Equipment Index.

21

Table of Contents

The information under the heading “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC is incorporated herein by reference.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this document.

Overview

The Company designs, develops, manufactures, markets and supports portable, software driven, 3-D measurement systems that are used in a broad range of manufacturing, industrial, building construction and forensic applications. The Company’s FaroArm, FARO Scan Arm and FARO Gage articulated measuring devices, the FARO Laser Scanner LS, the FARO Laser Tracker, and their companion CAM2 software, provide for Computer-Aided Design (“CAD”)-based inspection and/or factory-level statistical process control, and high-density surveying. Together, these products integrate the measurement, quality inspection, and reverse engineering functions with CAD software to improve productivity, enhance product quality and decrease rework and scrap in the manufacturing process. The Company uses the acronym “CAM2” for this process, which stands for computer-aided measurement. As of December 2007, the Company’s products have been purchased by approximately 7,400 customers worldwide, ranging from small machine shops to such large manufacturing and industrial companies as Audi, Bell Helicopter, Boeing, British Aerospace, Caterpillar, Daimler Chrysler, General Electric, General Motors, Honda, Johnson Controls, Komatsu Dresser, Lockheed Martin, Nissan, Siemens and Volkswagen, among many others.

22

Table of Contents

The Company operates in international markets throughout the world. It maintains sales offices in France, Germany, Great Britain, Japan, Spain, Italy, China, India, Poland, Netherlands, Malaysia and Vietnam. The Company added a new regional headquarters in Singapore in the third quarter of 2005 along with a new manufacturing and service facility there in the fourth quarter of 2005. In 2006 the Company closed its South Korean office and established a third party distributor relationship for serving that market, and in December 2006, the Company established a sales office in Thailand. The Company manages and reports its global sales in three regions: the Americas, Europe/Africa and Asia/Pacific. In 2007, 41.7% of the Company’s sales were in the Americas compared to 41.3% in 2006, 40.9% were in the Europe/Africa region compared to 39.9% in 2006 and 17.4% were in the Asia/Pacific region, compared to 18.8% in 2006 (see also Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

The Company derives revenues primarily from the sale of its FaroArm, FARO Scan Arm, FARO Gage, FARO Laser Tracker and FARO Laser Scanner LS 3-D measurement equipment, and their related multi-faceted software. Revenue related to these products is generally recognized upon shipment. In addition, the Company sells one and three-year extended warranties and training and technology consulting services relating to its products. The Company recognizes the revenue from extended warranties on a straight-line basis. The Company also receives royalties from licensing agreements for its historical medical technology and recognizes the revenue from these royalties as licensees use the technology.

The Company manufactures its FaroArm, FARO Gage, and FARO Laser Tracker products in its manufacturing facility located in Switzerland for customer orders from the Europe/Africa region and in its manufacturing facility located in Singapore for customer orders from the Asia/Pacific region. The Company manufactures its FaroArm, FARO Gage, and FARO Laser Tracker products in the Company’s manufacturing facilities located in Florida and Pennsylvania for customer orders from the Americas. The Company manufactures its FARO Laser Scanner LS product in its facility located in Stuttgart, Germany. The Company expects all its existing plants to have the production capacity necessary to support its growth through 2008.

With respect to the financial performance in 2007, cost of sales consists primarily of material, labor and production overhead. Gross margin for fiscal 2007 was 60.0%

Selling expenses as a percentage of sales was 29.3% in 2007 compared to 29.7% in 2006. This percentage has decreased to 28.7% in the second half of 2007 from 30.0% in the first half of 2007 as new sales personnel became more productive.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries for administrative personnel, rent, utilities and professional and legal expenses. General and administrative expenses were 13.3% of sales in 2007 and included the accrual of $2.65 million for the estimated fines and penalties related to the FCPA matter and $1.1 million in professional fees related to the FCPA matter and resolution of the patent litigation which was settled in 2007. General and administrative expenses were 16.1% of sales in 2006 and included $6.8 million in professional and legal expenses related to the FCPA matter and patent litigation costs.

Research and development expenses represent salaries, equipment and third-party services. The Company expects to support ongoing research and development and intends to continue to fund these efforts at the level of 5%-7% of sales going forward.

The Company incurred minimal expenses in 2006 as calculated under the Black-Scholes method of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), related to its adoption of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) for the expensing of stock options as it vested substantially all of its unvested options in the fourth quarter of 2005. The reduction in pre-tax charges estimated by the Company as a result of the acceleration amounts to approximately $7.7 million over the course of the original vesting periods. Options to purchase approximately 704,310 shares of the Company’s stock or 52.5% of the Company’s outstanding options were accelerated. The weighted average exercise price of the options subject to acceleration

23

Table of Contents

was $21.30. The aggregate pretax expense for the shares subject to acceleration that would have been reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning in 2006 is approximately $7.7 million, including $4.3 million in 2006, $2.7 million in 2007, and $0.7 million in 2008. The fair value for any future grants will be included in expense over the vesting periods. These expenses will be apportioned according to the classification of the recipients who have received stock options into cost of sales, selling, general and administrative or research and development costs.

In 2007, the Company’s worldwide effective tax rate was 21.5%. The Company has received a favorable income tax rate commitment from the Swiss government as an incentive to establish a manufacturing plant in Switzerland, and in 2006 received approval from the Singapore Economic Development Board for a favorable multi-year income tax holiday for our Singapore headquarters and manufacturing operations subject to certain terms and conditions including employment, spending, and capital investment. (See Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes below).

Accounting for wholly owned foreign subsidiaries is maintained in the currency of the respective foreign jurisdiction and, therefore, fluctuations in exchange rates may have an impact on inter-company accounts reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company is aware of the availability of off-balance sheet financial instruments to hedge exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, including cross-currency swaps, forward contracts and foreign currency options (see Foreign Exchange Exposure below). However, the Company does not regularly use such instruments, and none were utilized in 2007, 2006, or 2005.

The Company has had twenty-two consecutive profitable quarters through December 31, 2007. Its sales and earnings growth have been the result of a number of factors, including: continuing market demand for and acceptance of the Company’s products; increased sales activity in part through additional sales staff worldwide, new products and product enhancements such as the FARO Gage and Laser Scanner; and the effect of acquisitions. The Company’s worldwide sales and marketing headcount in 2007, 2006 and 2005 was 321, 265, and 289, respectively.

On January 10, 2005, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission allowing it to raise proceeds of up to $125 million. The proceeds from any offerings with respect to this registration statement, if any, would be used for either repayment or refinancing of debt, acquisition of additional businesses or technologies or for working capital and general corporate purposes. On August 14, 2007, the Company sold 1,650,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering pursuant to its Form S-3 Registration Statement to certain institutional investors at $34.00 per share. The net proceeds after deducting placement fees and other offering expenses were approximately $53.0 million. (See also Liquidity and Capital Resources below).

FCPA Update

As previously reported by the Company, the Company learned that its China subsidiary had made payments to certain customers in China that may have violated the FCPA and other applicable laws. The Company’s Audit Committee instituted an internal investigation into this matter in February 2006, and the Company voluntarily notified the SEC and the DOJ of this matter in March 2006. The Company’s internal investigation into this matter has been completed. The Company’s internal investigation identified certain improper payments made in China and deficiencies in its controls with respect to its operations in China in possible violation of the FCPA.

Results of the investigation revealed that referral fee payments in possible violation of the FCPA were $165,000 and $265,000 in 2004 and 2005, respectively, which were recorded in selling expenses in its statements of income. The related sales to customers to which payment of these referral fees had been made totaled approximately $1.3 million and $3.24 million in 2004 and 2005, respectively. Additional improper referral fee payments of $122,000 were made in January and February 2006 related to sales contracts in 2005. The Company had sales in China of $9.0 million in 2005 and $4.2 million in 2004, approximately 7% and 4% of total sales,

24

Table of Contents

respectively. The Company incurred expenses of $3.1 million in 2007, including $2.65 million for estimated fines and penalties to the DOJ and SEC, and $3.8 million in the 2006, relating to the FCPA matter.

The Company has provided to the SEC and the DOJ information obtained during the course of this investigation and is cooperating with both agencies. The SEC and the DOJ have a broad range of civil and criminal remedies that they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals in appropriate circumstances, including without limitation disgorgement, fines, penalties, and other injunctive and equitable relief, as well as additional changes to the Company’s business practices and compliance programs.

The Company has engaged in settlement discussions with both the SEC and the DOJ concerning the FCPA matter. Although there is no assurance that such discussions will result in a resolution of the FCPA matter, the Company has determined that the settlement discussions are likely to result in a resolution that will include a fine and disgorgement of associated profits. The Company recorded in the third quarter of 2007 a reserve of $2.65 million in anticipation of the amount that could be necessary to satisfy its financial obligations to the SEC and the DOJ in resolving this matter. Predicting at this time when the FCPA matter will be finally resolved with the SEC and the DOJ is not possible. The monetary sanctions ultimately paid by the Company to the SEC and the DOJ in resolving this matter, whether imposed on the Company or agreed to by settlement, may exceed the amount that has been reserved by the Company.

The Company anticipates that resolution of the matter will not result in formal criminal charges being filed against it by the DOJ. The Company expects that as part of the final resolution of the FCPA matter with the SEC and the DOJ, in addition to monetary sanctions, the Company will have continuing obligations with the SEC and the DOJ with respect to monitoring, compliance with the FCPA and other laws, full cooperation with the government, and the adoption of a compliance code containing specific provisions intended to prevent violations of the FCPA. The Company expects that the failure to comply with any such continuing obligations could result in the SEC and the DOJ seeking to impose penalties against the Company in the future.

The Company terminated, in March 2006, certain personnel in the Asia-Pacific Region and re-assigned the duties of other personnel in both the Asia-Pacific Region and the U.S. as a result of the internal investigation. Additionally, the Company instituted the following remedial measures:

25

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the percentage of sales represented by certain items in the Company’s consolidated statements of income:

2007 Compared to 2006

Sales.    Sales increased by $39.2 million, or 25.7%, to $191.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2007, from $152.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in unit sales. Sales in the Americas region increased $17.1 million, or 27.0%, to $80.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2007, from $62.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006. Sales in the Europe/Africa region increased $17.4 million, or 28.6%, to $78.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, from $60.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006. Sales in the Asia/Pacific region increased $4.7 million, or 16.7%, to $33.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, from $28.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2006.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit increased by $25.5 million, or 28.6%, to $115.0 million for year ended December 31, 2007, from $89.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Gross margin increased to 60.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007, from 58.7% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in gross margin is primarily due to a change in the sales mix resulting in an increase in unit sales in product lines with lower unit costs than the prior year period and as a result of continuing productivity improvements. The Company expects the trend of changes in the sales mix to result in gross margins in the range of approximately 58% to 60% in 2008.

Selling Expenses.    Selling expenses increased by $10.8 million, or 24.0%, to $56.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, from $45.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase in commission and compensation expense of $6.8 million, an increase in marketing and advertising costs of $1.4 million, an increase in travel related expenses of $1.4 million and an increase in recruiting and hiring expense of $0.6 million. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses decreased to 29.3% of sales in the year ended December 31, 2007 from 29.7% in the year ended December 31, 2006.

26

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses.    General and administrative expenses increased by $0.9 million, or 3.9%, to $25.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, from $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2007 include the accrual of $2.65 million for the estimated fines and penalties related to the FCPA matter and $1.1 million in professional fees related to the FCPA matter and resolution of the patent litigation which was settled in 2007. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2006 included $6.8 million in professional and legal expenses related to the FCPA matter and patent litigation costs. General and administrative expenses decreased to 13.3% of sales for 2007 from 16.1% for 2006. Excluding the effects of the penalty accrual and the professional fees related to the FCPA matter and patent litigation, general and administrative expenses increased by $4.0 million primarily as a result of increases in compensation costs of $2.3 million, including equity based compensation, and other professional fees of $0.9 million.

Depreciation and amortization expenses.    Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $0.1 million to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Research and development expenses.    Research and development expenses increased by $3.1 million to $10.3 million for year ended December 31, 2007, from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of an increase in compensation and third party R&D expense related to new product releases. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 5.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007, from 4.7% for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Interest income / expense.    Interest income, net, increased by $1.3 million to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to an increase in short term investments.

Other income (expense), net.    Other (income) expense, net, increased by $1.1 million to $1.9 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2007, from income of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of an increase in foreign exchange transaction gains.

Income tax expense.    Income tax expense increased by $3.3 million to $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to an increase in pretax income. The Company’s effective tax rate increased to 21.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007, from 16.2% primarily as a result of an increase in expenses that are non-deductible for U.S. income tax purposes of $2.65 million related to an accrual for penalties in connection with the resolution of the FCPA matter. The Company’s effective income tax rate, excluding this effect, would have been 17.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company believes that calculating its effective tax rate without the impact of the FCPA charge is useful to management and investors to provide greater clarity and to facilitate internal and external comparisons to the Company’s historical tax rate. The Company’s tax rate continues to be lower than the statutory tax rate in the United States primarily as a result of favorable tax rates in foreign jurisdictions. The Company currently estimates the effective tax rate, excluding the effects of the FCPA matter, will approximate 18%-22% for fiscal 2008. However, the Company’s tax rate could be impacted positively or negatively by geographic changes in the manufacturing or sales of its products and the resulting effect on taxable income in each jurisdiction. The Company has $5.2 million in net deferred tax assets remaining, which will, more likely than not, be realized in 2008 and thereafter if the Company remains consistently profitable (See also Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Separate from income tax expenses, the Company recorded an addition to shareholders’ equity of $1.0 million in 2007 for the income tax benefit received from the non-qualified disposition of incentive stock options by employees.

Total deferred taxes for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries relating to net operating loss carryforwards were $7.7 million and $6.3 million at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The related valuation allowance was $6.3 million and $4.4 million at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

27

Table of Contents

Net income.    Net income increased by $9.9 million to $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the factors described above.

2006 Compared to 2005

Sales.    Sales increased $26.8 million, or 21.3%, to $152.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2006, from $125.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in unit sales. The Company’s sales growth is driven by increased product sales resulting from continuing market demand for and acceptance of its products. Sales in the Americas region increased $7.0 million or 12.5%, to $62.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 from $55.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2005. Sales in the Europe/Africa region increased $16.0 million, or 35.6%, to $60.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 from $44.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2005. Sales in the Asia/Pacific region increased $3.8 million, or 15.3% to $28.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2006 from $24.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2005. In 2006 the Company’s sales and marketing headcount decreased to 83 from 88 in the Americas, increased to 118 from 117 in Europe/Africa, and decreased to 64 from 84 in the Asia/Pacific region.

Gross profit.    Gross profit increased $16.6 million, or 22.8%, to $89.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $72.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Gross margin increased to 58.7% in the year ended December 31, 2006, from 58.1% for the year ended December 31, 2005 primarily due to a change in the sales mix resulting in an increase in unit sales of product lines with a lower than average cost of sales.

Selling expenses.    Selling expenses increased by $8.0 million or 21.4%, to $45.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $37.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to higher compensation and commission expense of $4.5 million related to the increase in sales, higher marketing costs of $2.9 million and higher product demonstration costs of $0.6 million. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses were unchanged at 29.7% in 2006 and 2005.

General and administrative expenses.    General and administrative expenses increased by $9.1 million or 58.7%, to $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to increased professional and legal fees of $5.4 million, of which $3.8 million was related to the Company’s investigation of possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by its Chinese subsidiary, and $1.4 million for ongoing patent litigation. In addition, compensation costs increased $1.7 million and expenses related to the Singapore facility, which opened in September 2005, increased by $0.3 million. General and administrative expenses as percentage of sales increased to 16.1% of sales in 2006 from 12.4% of sales in 2005.

Depreciation and amortization expenses.    Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $0.6 million or 17.1%, to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $3.5 million in 2005, primarily due to an increase in depreciation of new equipment from the Company’s Asia/Pacific expansion and additions to its leased space in the U.S.

Research and development expenses.    Research and development expenses increased by $0.8 million or 12.5%, to $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This resulted primarily from an increase in salaries and subcontractors expense of $0.7 million related to the addition of the Laser Scanner product line. Research and development expenses as a percentage of sales were 4.7% in 2006 compared to 5.1% in 2005.

Interest income / expense.    Interest income increased by $0.1 million or 16.7%, to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily due to an increase in interest rates and short term investments. Interest expense decreased slightly due to the purchase of iQvolution in 2005 and subsequent retirement of their debt obligations.

28

Table of Contents

Other income (expense), net.    Other income (expense), net increased by $1.6 million, to income of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from an expense of $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Other income includes foreign exchange gains of $0.8 million in 2006.

Income tax expense.    Income tax expense decreased to $1.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2006, from $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The effective tax rate in 2006 was 16.2% compared to 17.4% in 2005. The primary reason for the lower tax rate was the effect of the receipt of approval of the tax holiday for the Company’s operations in Singapore effective January 1, 2006 for a period of four years and an additional six year extension at a favorable tax rate subject to certain terms and conditions including employment, spending, and capital investment. The Company has $4.6 million in net deferred tax assets remaining, which will, more likely than not, be realized in 2007 and thereafter if the Company remains consistently profitable (See also Note 14-Income Taxes). Separate from income tax expenses, the Company recorded an addition to shareholders’ equity of $0.01 million in 2006 for the income tax benefit received from the exercise of unqualified stock options by employees.

Net income.    Net income was $8.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of the factors described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has financed its operations primarily from cash provided by operating activities, proceeds of its 1997 initial public offering of common stock of approximately $31.5 million and, its 2003 private placement of its common stock with various institutional investors totaling approximately $24.9 million.

On January 10, 2005, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission allowing it to raise proceeds of up to $125 million. The proceeds from any offerings with respect to this registration statement, if any, would be used for either repayment or refinancing of debt, acquisition of additional businesses or technologies or for working capital and general corporate purposes.

On August 14, 2007, the Company sold 1,650,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering pursuant to its Form S-3 Registration Statement to certain institutional investors at $34.00 per share. The net proceeds after deducting placement fees and other offering expenses were approximately $53.0 million.

Cash and cash equivalents increased by $10.1 million to $25.8 million at December 31, 2007 from $15.7 million at December 31, 2006. The increase resulted from cash provided by operating activities of $21.6 million and $5.3 million from the issuance of common stock related to the exercise of stock options and $1.0 million of related income tax benefit, partially offset by purchases of short term investments of $8.6 million, purchases of equipment and intangible assets of $3.3 million, and $5.9 million related to the effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash. In addition, the Company increased its short term investments by $61.6 million to $77.4 million at December 31, 2007 from $15.8 million at December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to cash provided by the net proceeds from the registered direct offering of $53.0 million and $8.6 million from cash provided by operations.

On July 11, 2006, the Company entered into a loan agreement providing for an available line of credit of $30.0 million. Loans under the agreement bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% and require the Company to maintain certain ratios with respect to a debt covenant agreement, including current ratio, consolidated EBITDA, and senior funded debt to EBITDA. As of December 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under the Amended Loan Agreement. The term of the Amended Loan Agreement extends to April 30, 2009. The Company has not drawn on this line of credit.

The Company believes that its working capital, anticipated cash flow from operations, and credit facility will be sufficient to fund its long-term liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.

29

Table of Contents

Off Balance Sheet Items

The Company is not party to any off-balance sheet items that have not already been appropriately disclosed in these financial statements.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Company is party to capital leases on equipment with an initial term of 36 to 60 months and other non-cancelable operating leases. These obligations are presented below as of December 31, 2007:

The Company enters into purchase commitments for products and services in the ordinary course of business. These purchases generally cover production requirements for 60 to 90 days. As of December 31, 2007, the Company does not have any long-term commitments for purchases.

Critical Accounting Policies

In response to the SEC’s financial reporting release, FR-60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies,” the Company has selected its critical accounting policies for purposes of explaining the methodology used in the calculation in addition to any inherent uncertainties pertaining to the possible effects on its financial condition. The critical policies discussed below are the Company’s processes of recognizing revenue, the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, income taxes, and the reserve for warranties. These policies affect current assets and operating results and are therefore critical in assessing the Company’s financial and operating status. These policies involve certain assumptions that, if incorrect, could create an adverse impact on the Company’s operations and financial position.

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, as well as disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience along with various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Some of these judgments can be subjective and complex and, consequently, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While for any given estimate or assumption made by the Company’s management there may be other estimates or assumptions that are reasonable, the Company believes that, given the current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any such other reasonable estimate or assumption would materially impact the financial statements.

Revenue Recognition—Revenue related to the Company’s measurement equipment and related software is generally recognized upon shipment as the Company considers the earnings process substantially complete as of the shipping date. Revenue from sales of software only is recognized when no further significant production, modification or customization of the software is required and where the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a sales agreement exists, delivery has occurred, and the sales price is fixed or determinable and deemed collectible. Revenues resulting from sales of comprehensive support, training and technology consulting services are recognized as such services are performed. Extended maintenance plan revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the plan. The Company warrants its products against defects in design, materials and workmanship for one year. A provision for estimated future costs relating to warranty expense is

30

Table of Contents

recorded when products are shipped. Costs relating to extended maintenance plans are recognized as incurred. Revenue from the licensing agreements for the use of the Company’s technology for medical applications is recognized as licensees use the technology.

The Reserve for Excess and Obsolete Inventory—Since the value of inventory that will ultimately be realized cannot be known with exact certainty, the Company relies upon both past sales history and future sales forecasts to provide a basis for the determination of the reserve. Inventory is considered obsolete if the Company has withdrawn those products from the market or had no sales of the product for the past 12 months, and has no sales forecasted for the next 12 months. Inventory is considered excess if the quantity on hand exceeds 12 months of remaining usage. The resulting obsolete and excess parts are then reviewed to determine if a substitute usage or a future need exists. Items without an identified current or future usage will be reserved in an amount equal to 100% of the FIFO cost of such inventory. The Company’s products are subject to changes in technologies that may make certain of its products or their components obsolete or less competitive, which may increase its historical provisions to the reserve.

Income Taxes—The Company reviews its deferred tax assets on a regular basis to evaluate their recoverability based upon expected future reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projections of future taxable income over a two year period, and tax planning strategies that it might employ to utilize such assets, including net operating loss carryforwards. Based on the positive and negative evidence described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the Company establishes a valuation allowance against the net deferred assets of a taxing jurisdiction in which it operates unless it is “more likely than not” that it will recover such assets through the above means. In the future, the Company’s evaluation of the need for the valuation allowance will be significantly influenced by its ability to achieve profitability and its ability to predict and achieve future projections of taxable income.

The Company operates in a number of different countries around the world and considers the statutory rates within each jurisdiction to determine the overall effective tax rate. In 2003, the Company began to manufacture its products in Switzerland, where it has received a favorable income tax rate commitment from the Swiss government as an incentive to establish a manufacturing plant there. The aggregate dollar effect of this favorable tax rate was approximately $2.0 million, or $0.13 per share for the year ended December 31, 2007, and $1.7 million, or $0.12 per share for the year ended December 31, 2006.

In 2005, the Company opened a regional headquarters and began to manufacture its products in Singapore, where it received approval for a four year tax holiday from the Singapore Economic Development Board as an incentive to establish a manufacturing plant and regional headquarters. The aggregate dollar effect of this favorable tax rate was approximately $2.0 million, or $0.13 per share for the year ended December 31, 2007, and $0.9 million, or $0.06 per share for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The Company is subject to certain terms and conditions including employment, spending, and capital investment in each of these countries in order to receive these favorable tax rates or be subject to the statutory rates. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of global business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. The Company has appropriately reserved for its tax uncertainties based on the criteria established by Interpretation No. 48. “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”.

The Reserve For Warranties—The Company establishes at the time of sale a liability for the one year warranty included with the initial purchase price of the equipment based upon an estimate of the repair expenses likely to be incurred for the warranty period. The warranty period is measured in installation-months for each major product group. Warranty reserve is reflected in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The warranty expense is estimated by applying the actual total repair expenses for each product group in the prior period and determining a rate of repair expense per installation month. This repair rate is multiplied by the number of installation-months of warranty for each product group to determine the provision

31

Table of Contents

for warranty expenses for the period. The Company evaluates its exposure to warranty costs at the end of each period using the estimated expense per installation-month for each major product group, the number of units remaining under warranty and the remaining number of months each unit will be under warranty. The Company has a history of new product introductions and enhancements to existing products which may result in unforeseen issues that may increase its warranty costs. While such expenses have historically been within expectations, the Company cannot guarantee this will continue in the future.

Foreign Exchange Exposure

The Company conducts a significant portion of its business outside the United States. At present, 58% of its revenues are invoiced, and a significant portion of its operating expenses paid, in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies may have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition, and could specifically result in foreign exchange gains and losses. The impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on the results of the Company’s operations cannot be accurately predicted. To the extent that the percentage of its non-U.S. dollar revenues derived from international sales increases (or decreases) in the future, the Company’s exposure to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may increase (or decrease).

Inflation

The Company believes that inflation has not had a material impact on its results of operations in recent years and does not expect inflation to have a material impact on its operations in 2008.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other eligible items at fair value when the items are not otherwise currently required to be measured at fair value. Under SFAS 159, the decision to measure items at fair value is made at specified election dates on an irrevocable instrument-by-instrument basis. Entities electing the fair value option would be required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings and to expense upfront costs and fees associated with the item for which the fair value option is elected. Entities electing the fair value option are required to distinguish, on the face of the statement of financial position, the fair value of assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using another measurement attribute. If elected, SFAS 159 will be effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted if all of the requirements of SFAS 159 are adopted. The impact of the adoption of SFAS 159 will be dependent on the extent to which the Company chooses to elect to measure eligible items at fair value.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The provisions of this statement are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied, with any transition adjustment recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 except for non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, for which the effective date is fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has not determined the effect, if any, that the adoption of this statement will have on its financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141 (revised)”). SFAS 141 (revised) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisistion date,

32

Table of Contents

measured at their fair values as of that date. The statement also requires the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values. The provisions of SFAS 141 (revised) are effective prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company has not determined the effect, if any, that the adoption of this statement will have on its financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment to ARB No. 51.” This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective prospectively, except for certain retrospective disclosure requirements, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has not determined the effect, if any, that the adoption of this statement will have on its financial condition or results of operations.

Foreign Exchange Exposure

The Company conducts a significant portion of its business outside the United States. At present, 58% of its revenues are invoiced, and a significant portion of its operating expenses paid, in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies may have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition, and could specifically result in foreign exchange gains and losses. The impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on the results of the Company’s operations cannot be accurately predicted. To the extent that the percentage of its non-U.S. dollar revenues derived from international sales increases (or decreases) in the future, the Company’s exposure to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates may increase (or decrease).

33

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of FARO Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FARO Technologies, Inc. (a Florida corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, as of January 1, 2006 and Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, as of January 1, 2007.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 10, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion.

March 10, 2008

34

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders of FARO Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We have audited FARO Technologies, Inc. (a Florida Corporation) and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We have also audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of FARO Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and our report dated March 10, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion.

March 10, 2008

35

Table of Contents

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

36

Table of Contents

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37

Table of Contents

FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007, 2006, AND 2005