FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

For the transition period from                                        to

Commission File Number: 001-34139

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Freddie Mac

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x Yes    ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x Yes    ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of July 24, 2013, there were 650,039,533 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

MD&A TABLE REFERENCE

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

We continue to operate under the conservatorship that commenced on September 6, 2008, under the direction of FHFA as our Conservator. The Conservator succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of Freddie Mac, and of any shareholder, officer or director thereof, with respect to the company and its assets. The Conservator has delegated certain authority to our Board of Directors to oversee, and management to conduct, day-to-day operations. The directors serve on behalf of, and exercise authority as directed by, the Conservator. See “BUSINESS — Conservatorship and Related Matters” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, or 2012 Annual Report, for information on the terms of the conservatorship, the powers of the Conservator, and related matters, including the terms of our Purchase Agreement with Treasury.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Form 10-Q and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q. Actual results might differ significantly from those described in or implied by such statements due to various factors and uncertainties, including those described in: (a) the “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” sections of this Form 10-Q, our 2012 Annual Report, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013; and (b) the “RISK FACTORS” and “BUSINESS” sections of our 2012 Annual Report.

Throughout this Form 10-Q, we use certain acronyms and terms that are defined in the “GLOSSARY.”

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read this MD&A in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 included in “FINANCIAL STATEMENTS” and our 2012 Annual Report.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview

Freddie Mac is a GSE chartered by Congress in 1970 with a public mission to provide liquidity, stability, and affordability to the U.S. housing market. We have maintained a consistent market presence since our inception, providing mortgage liquidity in a wide range of economic environments. We are working to support the recovery of the housing market and the nation’s economy by providing essential liquidity to the mortgage market and helping to stem the rate of foreclosures. We believe our actions are helping communities across the country by providing America’s families with access to mortgage funding at low rates while helping distressed borrowers keep their homes and avoid foreclosure, where feasible.

Summary of Financial Results

During the second quarter of 2013, we continued to observe improvement in the housing market, which contributed positively to our financial results. Our comprehensive income for the second quarter of 2013 was $4.4 billion, consisting of $5.0 billion of net income and $(631) million of other comprehensive loss. By comparison, our comprehensive income for the second quarter of 2012 was $2.9 billion, consisting of $3.0 billion of net income and $(128) million of other comprehensive loss.

Our total equity was $7.4 billion at June 30, 2013, reflecting our total equity balance of $10.0 billion at March 31, 2013, comprehensive income of $4.4 billion for the second quarter of 2013, and a $7.0 billion dividend payment on the senior preferred stock in June 2013 based on our Net Worth Amount at March 31, 2013. As a result of our positive net worth at June 30, 2013, no draw is being requested from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement for the second quarter of 2013. Based on our Net Worth Amount at June 30, 2013, our dividend obligation to Treasury in September 2013 will be $4.4 billion.

Our Primary Business Objectives

We are focused on the following primary business objectives: (a) providing credit availability for mortgages and maintaining foreclosure prevention activities; (b) minimizing our credit losses; (c) developing mortgage market

Table of Contents

enhancements in support of a new infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market; (d) maintaining sound credit quality on the loans we purchase or guarantee; (e) contracting the dominant presence of the GSEs in the marketplace; and (f) strengthening our infrastructure and improving overall efficiency.

Our business objectives reflect direction we have received from the Conservator, including the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard. The 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard details specific priorities for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in 2013 that build upon the three strategic goals announced in FHFA’s Strategic Plan for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae: (a) build a new infrastructure for the secondary mortgage market; (b) gradually contract Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s dominant presence in the marketplace while simplifying and shrinking their operations; and (c) maintain foreclosure prevention activities and credit availability for new and refinanced mortgages. We continue to align our resources and internal business plans to meet the goals and objectives provided to us by FHFA. For information on the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard and the Strategic Plan, see our current report on Form 8-K dated March 8, 2013 and “BUSINESS — Regulation and Supervision — Legislative and Regulatory Developments — FHFA’s Strategic Plan for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Conservatorships” in our 2012 Annual Report.

Providing Credit Availability for Mortgages and Maintaining Foreclosure Prevention Activities

Our consistent market presence provides lenders with a constant source of liquidity for conforming mortgage products even when other sources of capital have withdrawn. We believe this liquidity provides our customers with confidence to continue lending in difficult environments. We estimate that we, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae collectively guaranteed more than 90% of the single-family conforming mortgages originated during the first half of 2013. We also enable mortgage originators to offer homebuyers and homeowners lower mortgage rates on conforming loan products, in part because of the value investors place on GSE-guaranteed mortgage-related securities. We estimate that borrowers were paying an average of 18 basis points less on 30-year, fixed-rate conforming loans than on non-conforming loans in June 2013. These estimates are based on data provided by HSH Associates, a third-party provider of mortgage market data.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we purchased or issued other guarantee commitments for $129.9 billion and $261.7 billion in UPB of single-family conforming mortgage loans, representing approximately 646,000 and 1,281,000 homes, respectively.

We are focused on reducing the number of foreclosures and helping to keep families in their homes. Since 2009, we have helped approximately 872,000 borrowers experiencing hardship complete a loan workout. Our relief refinance initiative, including HARP (which is the portion of our relief refinance initiative for loans with LTV ratios above 80%), is a significant part of our effort to keep families in their homes. We purchased $41.8 billion and $40.5 billion in UPB of HARP loans in the first half of 2013 and 2012, respectively. We have purchased HARP loans provided to more than 1.1 million borrowers since the initiative began in 2009, including approximately 223,000 borrowers during the first half of 2013.

Under our loan workout programs, our servicers contact borrowers experiencing hardship with a goal of helping them stay in their homes or avoid foreclosure. Our servicers seek and also facilitate the completion of foreclosure alternatives when a home retention solution is not possible. In March 2013, as part of the servicing alignment initiative, we announced a new streamlined modification initiative, which provides an additional modification opportunity to certain borrowers who are at least 90 (but not more than 720) days delinquent. This initiative was implemented in July 2013 (with earlier adoption permitted). See “RISK MANAGEMENT — Credit Risk — Mortgage Credit Risk — Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk” for more information about loss mitigation activities and our efforts to provide credit availability, including through our loan modification initiatives, and our relief refinance mortgage initiative, which includes HARP.

Short sale activity as a percentage of the combined total of short sales and foreclosure transfers increased from 31% in the first half of 2012 to 42% in the first half of 2013. Our short sale activity has remained high compared to historical levels while the volume of foreclosures has declined in recent quarters. Due to changes in our short sale process that we made in the second half of 2012, we believe our short sale activity will continue to remain high for the remainder of 2013.

The table below presents our single-family loan workout activities for the last five quarters.

Table of Contents

Table 1 — Total Single-Family Loan Workout Volumes⁽¹⁾

Minimizing Our Credit Losses

To help minimize the credit losses related to our guarantee activities, we are focused on:

We establish guidelines for our servicers to follow and provide them default management tools to use, in part, in determining which type of loan workout to pursue with borrowers that would be expected to provide us with the opportunity to minimize our exposure to credit losses. Our servicers pursue repayment plans and loan modifications for borrowers facing financial or other hardships because the level of recovery (if a loan reperforms) may often be much higher than would be the case with foreclosure or foreclosure alternatives. In cases where repayment plans and loan modifications are not possible or successful, a short sale transaction typically provides us with a comparable or higher level of recovery than what we would receive through foreclosure and subsequent property sale from our REO inventory. In large part, the benefit of a short sale arises from the avoidance of costs we would otherwise incur to complete the foreclosure and dispose of the property, including maintenance and other property expenses associated with holding REO property.

We continue to face challenges with respect to the performance of certain of our seller/servicers in managing our seriously delinquent loans. As part of our efforts to address this issue and mitigate our credit losses, we have been facilitating the transfer of servicing from certain underperforming servicers to other servicers that specialize in workouts of problem loans.

We have contractual arrangements with our seller/servicers under which they agree to sell us mortgage loans, and represent and warrant that those loans meet specified eligibility and underwriting standards. In addition, our servicers represent and warrant to us that those loans will be serviced in accordance with our servicing contract. If we subsequently discover that the representations and warranties were breached (i.e., contractual standards were not followed), we can exercise certain contractual remedies, including requesting repurchase, to mitigate our actual or potential credit losses. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the UPB of loans subject to repurchase requests issued to our single-family seller/servicers was approximately $3.2 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively (these figures include repurchase requests for which appeals were pending). During the first half of 2013, we began an initiative designed to assist our seller/servicers improve their underwriting process for loans that they sell to us by increasing conformity to certain of our underwriting standards. This new initiative will provide a new automated tool for use by seller/servicers in evaluating the underwriting of loans with real-time feedback on identification of non-compliance issues.

Historically, we have used a process of reviewing a sample of the loans we purchase to validate compliance with our underwriting standards. In addition, as part of our loss mitigation efforts, we review loans that become delinquent. FHFA set

Table of Contents

a goal for us (in the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard) to complete our demands for remedies for breaches of representations and warranties related to pre-conservatorship loan activity. As a result, our repurchase request volumes with our seller/servicers may increase in future periods.

Our credit loss exposure is also partially mitigated by mortgage insurance, which is a form of credit enhancement. Primary mortgage insurance is generally required to be purchased, typically at the borrower’s expense, for certain mortgages with higher LTV ratios. Although we received payments under primary and other mortgage insurance of $0.9 billion and $1.0 billion in the first half of 2013 and 2012, respectively, which helped to mitigate our credit losses, many of our mortgage insurers remain financially weak. As a result, we expect to receive substantially less than full payment of our claims from three of our mortgage insurance counterparties that are currently partially paying claims under orders of their state regulators. See “RISK MANAGEMENT — Credit Risk — Institutional Credit Risk — Mortgage Insurers” for information on these counterparties. See “NOTE 4: MORTGAGE LOANS AND LOAN LOSS RESERVES — Table 4.5 — Recourse and Other Forms of Credit Protection” for more information about credit enhancements of our single-family credit guarantee portfolio.

Developing Mortgage Market Enhancements in Support of a New Infrastructure for the Secondary Mortgage Market

We continue efforts that we believe will create value for the industry by building the infrastructure for a future housing finance system. In this regard, the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard established the following goals for 2013:

Maintaining Sound Credit Quality on the Loans We Purchase or Guarantee

We continue to focus on maintaining credit policies, including our underwriting standards, that allow us to purchase and guarantee loans made to qualified borrowers that we believe will provide management and guarantee fee income (excluding the amounts associated with the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011), over the long-term, that exceeds our expected credit-related and administrative expenses on such loans.

The credit quality of the single-family loans we acquired beginning in 2009 (excluding HARP and other relief refinance mortgages) is significantly better than that of loans we acquired from 2005 to 2008, as measured by original LTV ratios, FICO scores, and the proportion of loans underwritten with fully documented income. The improvement in credit quality of loans we have purchased since 2008 (excluding HARP and other relief refinance mortgages) is primarily the result of: (a) changes in our credit policies, including changes in our underwriting standards; (b) fewer purchases of loans with higher risk characteristics; and (c) changes in mortgage insurers’ and lenders’ underwriting practices.

Underwriting procedures for relief refinance mortgages are limited in many cases, and such procedures generally do not include all of the changes in underwriting standards we have implemented since 2008. As a result, relief refinance mortgages generally reflect many of the credit risk attributes of the original loans. However, our relief refinance mortgage initiative may help reduce our exposure to credit risk in cases where the borrowers’ payments under their mortgages are reduced, thereby strengthening the borrowers’ potential to make their mortgage payments.

Mortgages originated after 2008, including HARP and other relief refinance mortgages, represented 70% and 63% of the UPB of our single-family credit guarantee portfolio as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, while the single-family loans originated from 2005 through 2008 represented 19% and 24% of this portfolio at these dates, respectively. Relief refinance mortgages of all LTV ratios comprised approximately 20% and 18% of the UPB in our total single-family credit guarantee portfolio at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. HARP loans represented 12% and 11% of the UPB of our single-family credit guarantee portfolio as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Approximately 97% and 95% of the single-family mortgages we purchased in the first half of 2013 and 2012, respectively, were fixed-rate, first lien amortizing mortgages, based on UPB. Approximately 81% and 84% of the single-family mortgages we purchased in the first half of 2013 and 2012, respectively, were refinance mortgages based on UPB.

Table of Contents

HARP loans comprised approximately 16% and 21% of our single-family purchase volume in the first half of 2013 and 2012, respectively, based on UPB.

Due to our participation in HARP, we purchase a significant number of loans that have original LTV ratios over 100%. The proportion of HARP loans we purchased with LTV ratios over 100% was 9% and 11% of our single-family mortgage purchases in the first half of 2013 and 2012, respectively. Over time, HARP loans may not perform as well as other refinance mortgages because the continued high LTV ratios and reduced underwriting standards of these loans increase the probability of default. In addition, HARP loans may not be covered by mortgage insurance for the full excess of their UPB over 80%. However, relief refinance mortgages (including HARP loans) generally have performed better than loans with similar characteristics remaining in our single-family credit guarantee portfolio that were originated prior to 2009.

The table below presents the composition and certain other information about loans in our single-family credit guarantee portfolio, by year of origination at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and for the first half of 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012.

Table 2 — Single-Family Credit Guarantee Portfolio Summary⁽¹⁾

Table of Contents

Contracting the Dominant Presence of the GSEs in the Marketplace

We continue to take steps toward the goal of gradually contracting our presence in the marketplace. For example, the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard established the following goals for 2013 (with credit for partial completion allowed):

The 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard states that our transactions related to these goals should be economically sensible, operationally well-controlled, involve a meaningful transference of credit risk, and be transparent to the marketplace. Changes in market and regulatory conditions will be taken into consideration when evaluating our performance against these goals.

Strengthening Our Infrastructure and Improving Overall Efficiency

We continue to work both to enhance the quality of our infrastructure and to improve our efficiency to preserve the taxpayers’ investment. We are focusing our resources primarily on key projects, many of which are related to FHFA-mandated strategic initiatives (e.g., initiatives under the Conservatorship Scorecards) that will likely take several years to implement. We are also focused on making significant improvements to our systems infrastructure in order to: (a) replace legacy hardware or software systems at the end of their useful lives and to strengthen our disaster recovery capabilities; and (b) improve our data collection and administration capabilities as well as our ability to assist in the servicing of loans.

We continue to actively manage our administrative expenses. Our administrative expenses increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to an increase in professional services expense related to legal expenses, initiatives we are implementing under the Conservatorship Scorecards, and other FHFA-mandated strategic initiatives. We believe the various FHFA-mandated strategic initiatives we are pursuing may continue to require significant resources and thus continue to affect our level of administrative expenses.

Single-Family Credit Guarantee Portfolio

The table below provides certain credit statistics for our single-family credit guarantee portfolio.

Table of Contents

Table 3 — Credit Statistics, Single-Family Credit Guarantee Portfolio

In discussing our credit performance, we often use the terms “credit losses” and “credit-related (benefit) expense”. These terms are significantly different. Our “credit losses” consist of charge-offs and REO operations expense, while our “credit-related (benefit) expense” consists of our provision (benefit) for credit losses and REO operations expense.

Since the beginning of 2008, on an aggregate basis, we have recorded provision for credit losses associated with single-family loans of approximately $74.2 billion, and have recorded an additional $3.8 billion in losses on loans purchased from PC trusts, net of recoveries. The majority of these losses are associated with loans originated in 2005 through 2008. While loans originated in 2005 through 2008 will give rise to additional credit losses that have not yet been incurred and, thus, have not yet been provisioned for, we believe that, as of June 30, 2013, we have reserved for or charged-off the majority of the total expected credit losses for these loans. Nevertheless, various factors, such as increases in unemployment rates or future declines in home prices, could require us to provide for losses on these loans beyond our current expectations.

Our loan loss reserves for single-family loans declined in each of the last six quarters, which in part reflects improvement in both borrower payment performance and lower severity ratios for both REO dispositions and short sale transactions due to the improvements in home prices in most areas during these periods. Our REO inventory also declined in each of the last six quarters primarily due to lower foreclosure activity as well as a significant number of borrowers completing short sales rather than foreclosures.

Our average REO disposition severity ratio improved to 31.2% for the second quarter of 2013 compared to 34.4% and 37.9% for the first quarter of 2013 and second quarter of 2012, respectively. We observed improvements in most areas during the first half of 2013, primarily due to increasing home prices. This ratio improved in each of the last six quarters, but remains high as compared to our experience in periods before 2008. Additionally, our REO disposition severity ratios have also been positively affected by changes made during 2012 to our process for determining the list price for our REO properties when we offer them for sale.

Table of Contents

The serious delinquency rate for our single-family credit guarantee portfolio was 2.79% at June 30, 2013, compared to 3.25% at December 31, 2012, and has improved in each of the last six quarters. Excluding relief refinance loans, the improvement in borrower payment performance during these periods reflects an improved credit profile of borrowers with loans originated since 2008. However, several factors, including the lengthening of the foreclosure process, have resulted in loans remaining in serious delinquency for longer periods than experienced prior to 2008, particularly in states that require a judicial foreclosure process. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the percentage of seriously delinquent loans that have been delinquent for more than six months was 74% and 72%, respectively, and most of these loans have been delinquent for more than one year. The longer a loan remains delinquent, the more challenging and costly it is to resolve.

Although the balance of our non-performing loans declined during the first half of 2013, it remained high at June 30, 2013, compared to periods prior to 2009.

The credit losses and loan loss reserves associated with our single-family credit guarantee portfolio remained elevated in the first half of 2013, due, in part, to:

Some of our loss mitigation activities create fluctuations in our delinquency statistics. See “RISK MANAGEMENT — Credit Risk — Mortgage Credit Risk — Single-family Mortgage Credit Risk — Credit Performance — Delinquencies” for further information about factors affecting our reported delinquency rates.

Conservatorship and Government Support for Our Business

We continue to operate under the direction of FHFA, as our Conservator. We are also subject to certain constraints on our business activities imposed by Treasury due to the terms of, and Treasury’s rights under, the Purchase Agreement. We are dependent upon the continued support of Treasury and FHFA in order to continue operating our business. Our ability to access funds from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement is critical to keeping us solvent and avoiding the appointment of a receiver by FHFA under statutory mandatory receivership provisions. The conservatorship and related matters have had a wide-ranging impact on us, including our regulatory supervision, management, business, financial condition, and results of operations.

There is significant uncertainty as to whether or when we will emerge from conservatorship, as it has no specified termination date, and as to what changes may occur to our business structure during or following conservatorship, including whether we will continue to exist. We are not aware of any current plans of our Conservator to significantly change our business model or capital structure in the near-term. Our future structure and role will be determined by the Administration and Congress, and there are likely to be significant changes beyond the near-term. We have no ability to predict the outcome of these deliberations.

Under the Purchase Agreement, we are required to pay dividends to Treasury to the extent that our Net Worth Amount exceeds the permitted Capital Reserve Amount, established at $3 billion for 2013 and declining to zero in 2018. Accordingly, we do not have the ability over the long term to build and retain the capital generated by our business operations, or return capital to stockholders other than Treasury.

Table of Contents

We paid dividends of $7.0 billion in cash on the senior preferred stock during the three months ended June 30, 2013, based on our Net Worth Amount at March 31, 2013. Through June 30, 2013, we have paid aggregate cash dividends to Treasury of $36.6 billion, an amount equal to 51% of our aggregate draws received under the Purchase Agreement. Under the Purchase Agreement, the payment of dividends cannot be used to reduce prior draws from Treasury. Based on our Net Worth Amount at June 30, 2013, our dividend obligation to Treasury in September 2013 will be $4.4 billion.

The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock was $72.3 billion at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The remaining funding commitment from Treasury under the Purchase Agreement is $140.5 billion. This amount will be reduced by any future draws. Under the Purchase Agreement, our ability to repay the liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock is limited and we will not be able to do so for the foreseeable future, if at all. The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock will increase further if we receive additional draws. For a discussion of factors that could result in additional draws, see “RISK FACTORS — Conservatorship and Related Matters — We may request additional draws under the Purchase Agreement in future periods” in our 2012 Annual Report.

For more information on the conservatorship and government support for our business, including the Purchase Agreement, see “BUSINESS — Conservatorship and Related Matters” and “— Treasury Agreements” in our 2012 Annual Report.

Consolidated Financial Results

Net income was $5.0 billion for the second quarter of 2013 compared to net income of $3.0 billion for the second quarter of 2012. Key highlights of our financial results include:

Mortgage Market and Economic Conditions

Overview

The U.S. real gross domestic product rose by 1.7% on an annualized basis during the second quarter of 2013, compared to 1.1% during the first quarter of 2013, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The national unemployment rate was 7.6% in both June and March 2013, compared to 7.8% in December 2012, based on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the data underlying the unemployment rate, an average of approximately 202,000 monthly net new jobs were added to the economy during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with an average monthly gain of 195,000 during the six months ended December 31, 2012, which shows evidence of a slow, but steady positive trend for the economy and the labor market. Long-term interest rates, such as those of 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, generally increased during the second quarter of 2013. For example, based on our weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey, the average rate on 30-year fixed-rate conforming mortgages with an average LTV ratio of 80% rose from 3.5% in March 2013 to 4.5% in June 2013.

Table of Contents

Single-Family Housing Market

The single-family housing market continued to show improvement in the second quarter of 2013 despite continued high unemployment rates in most areas of the U.S. and a significant inventory of seriously delinquent loans and REO properties in the market.

Based on data from the National Association of Realtors, sales of existing homes in the second quarter of 2013 averaged 5.06 million (at a seasonally adjusted annual rate), increasing 2.4% from 4.94 million homes in the first quarter of 2013. Based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau and HUD, new home sales in the second quarter of 2013 averaged approximately 470,000 (at a seasonally adjusted annual rate) increasing approximately 4.7% from approximately 449,000 in the first quarter of 2013. Home prices increased during the second quarter of 2013, with our nationwide index registering approximately a 5.2% increase from March 2013 through June 2013 without seasonal adjustment. From June 2012 through June 2013 our nationwide home price index increased approximately 9.3%. These estimates were based on our own price index of mortgage loans on one-family homes funded by us or Fannie Mae. Other indices of home prices may have different results, as they are determined using different pools of mortgage loans and calculated under different conventions than our own.

Multifamily Housing Market

The multifamily market has experienced very strong rent and vacancy trends over the last few years, but the pace has slowed in recent periods. The most recent preliminary data reported by Reis, Inc. indicated that, after three straight years of declines, the national apartment vacancy rate remained unchanged at 4.3% during the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the first quarter of 2013; this represents the lowest level since 2001. In addition, Reis, Inc. reported that effective rents grew by 0.7% during the second quarter of 2013, compared to 0.6% during the first quarter of 2013. According to the latest available information from Real Capital Analytics, Inc., national average apartment property values have risen more than 12% from March 2012 to March 2013 and are near the peak values experienced in the second quarter of 2007. As a result, the multifamily sector continued to experience strong investor interest and continued to outperform other commercial real estate sectors in the first half of 2013. Vacancy rates and effective rents are important to loan performance because multifamily loans are generally repaid from the cash flows generated by the underlying property and these factors significantly influence those cash flows. We expect multifamily market fundamentals (i.e., vacancy rates and effective rents) to remain at favorable levels for the remainder of 2013.

Mortgage Market and Business Outlook

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. These statements are not historical facts, but rather represent our expectations based on current information, plans, judgments, assumptions, estimates, and projections. Actual results may differ significantly from those described in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to various factors and uncertainties. For example, a number of factors could cause the actual performance of the housing and mortgage markets and the U.S. economy in the near term to be significantly worse than we expect, including adverse changes in national or international economic conditions and changes in the federal government’s fiscal or monetary policies. See “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” for additional information.

Single-Family

We continue to expect key macroeconomic drivers of the economy, such as income growth, employment, and inflation, to affect the performance of the housing and mortgage markets in the remainder of 2013. Since we expect that moderate economic growth will continue and mortgage interest rates will remain relatively low in the remainder of 2013, compared to historical levels, we believe that housing affordability will remain high in the second half of 2013 for potential home buyers. We also expect that the volume of home sales will likely increase in 2013, compared to 2012 but still remain relatively low compared to historical levels. We expect to experience continued levels of refinancing activity in the near term, due to the impact of HARP, but the recent increases in mortgage rates may slow the levels of refinancing activity, potentially significantly, in the second half of 2013 which could, in turn, impact overall purchase volume. For information on the HARP initiative, see “RISK MANAGEMENT — Credit Risk — Mortgage Credit Risk — Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk — Single-Family Loan Workouts and the MHA Program.”

Although national home prices have recorded gains for the last six quarters, home prices during the first half of 2013 remained significantly below their peak levels in many geographical areas. Declines in the market’s inventory of homes for sale have supported stabilization and increases in home prices in a number of metropolitan areas. We believe that home sales

Table of Contents

will have only modest growth in the second half of 2013. We also believe that home prices will not continue the same growth rate experienced in the first half of 2013, but will gradually moderate and will return towards growth rates that are consistent with long-term historical averages experienced prior to 2004.

Our charge-offs were elevated during the first half of 2013 compared to levels before 2009 and we expect they will continue to be elevated during the remainder of the year. This is in part due to the substantial number of underwater mortgage loans in our single-family credit guarantee portfolio. For the near term, we also expect:

Our guarantee fee rate charged on new acquisitions increased in 2013 as a result of two across-the-board increases in guarantee fees in 2012. We expect to introduce further increases in our guarantee fees (consistent with directives from FHFA). As a result of the 2012 increases and expected future increases, the average management and guarantee fee rate we charge for loans in the second half of 2013 and thereafter will generally be higher than the average fee we charged for loans we purchased in previous years.

Multifamily

During the first half of 2013, we continued to serve as a constant and stable source of liquidity and to support the multifamily market and the nation’s renters, as evidenced by our $13.5 billion of multifamily new business activity (the combination of our loan purchases and issuances of other guarantee commitments), which provided financing for more than 750 properties amounting to nearly 185,000 apartment units. The majority of these apartments were affordable to low and moderate income families. We expect lower new business volume for the remainder of 2013, due to increased competition from other market participants and the effect of the steps we have taken during the first half of the year (such as increased pricing) towards meeting the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard goal of reducing our new business volume by at least 10% as compared to 2012 levels.

New supply of multifamily housing has been relatively low following the recession of the late-2000s, but has been increasing in recent periods as market fundamentals have remained positive. Our expectation is that at the national level, new supply will not accelerate beyond sustainable levels over the near term because of constraints, such as rising construction costs and uncertainties in the capital markets. We expect that demand growth, driven by a strengthening economy and positive demographics, will generally be sufficient for the increased supply. However, there may be certain local markets where new supply could potentially outpace demand, which would be evidenced by excess supply and rising vacancy rates.

As a result of the positive market fundamentals and continuing strong portfolio performance, we expect our credit losses and delinquency rates to remain low in the remainder of 2013. Mortgage credit spreads have been volatile in recent months, which we believe has created some uncertainty regarding the future availability and cost of multifamily credit. Continued volatility in interest rates and credit spreads may reduce investor demand and cause declines in property values. However, we believe the long-term outlook for the multifamily market continues to be favorable.

Limits on Investment Activity and Our Mortgage-Related Investments Portfolio

The conservatorship has significantly affected our investment activity. FHFA has stated that we will not be a substantial buyer or seller of mortgages for our mortgage-related investments portfolio. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement and FHFA regulation, the UPB of our mortgage-related investments portfolio is subject to a cap that decreases by 15% each year until the portfolio reaches $250 billion. As a result, the UPB of our mortgage-related investments portfolio may not exceed $553 billion as of December 31, 2013. FHFA has indicated that such portfolio reduction targets should be viewed as minimum reductions and has encouraged us to reduce the mortgage-related investments portfolio at a faster rate than required, while indicating that the pace of reducing the portfolio may be moderated by conditions in the housing and financial markets. This strategy is designed to reduce the portfolio and provide the best return to the taxpayer while minimizing market disruption.

In addition, the 2013 Conservatorship Scorecard includes a goal to reduce the December 31, 2012 mortgage-related investments portfolio balance by selling 5%, or $15.7 billion in UPB, of mortgage-related assets (exclusive of agency securities, multifamily loans classified as held-for-sale, and single-family loans purchased for cash). Through June 30, 2013, we have sold $3.3 billion of assets that are intended to qualify toward this goal.

Table of Contents

These mortgage-related investments portfolio reduction actions are expected to negatively impact our income from this portfolio for the next several years.

From time to time, we also may undertake actions in an effort to support the liquidity and the relative price performance of our PCs to comparable Fannie Mae securities through a variety of activities in our Investments and Single-family Guarantee segments. These activities can include the purchase and sale of Freddie Mac mortgage-related securities, purchases of loans, and dollar roll transactions, as well as the issuance of REMICs and Other Structured Securities. Our purchases and sales of mortgage-related securities and our issuances of REMICs and Other Structured Securities influence the relative supply and demand (i.e., liquidity) for these securities, helping to support the price performance of our PCs. Depending upon market conditions, including the relative prices, supply and demand for our PCs and comparable Fannie Mae securities, as well as other factors, there may be substantial variability in any period in the total amount of securities we purchase or sell, and in the success of our efforts to support the liquidity and price performance of our PCs. We incur costs in connection with our efforts to support the liquidity and price performance of our PCs, including engaging in transactions that yield less than our target rate of return. For more information, see “BUSINESS — Our Business Segments — Investments Segment — PC Support Activities” in our 2012 Annual Report.

The table below presents the UPB of our mortgage-related investments portfolio, for purposes of the limit imposed by the Purchase Agreement and FHFA regulation.

Table 4 — Mortgage-Related Investments Portfolio⁽¹⁾

The UPB of our mortgage-related investments portfolio at June 30, 2013 was $521.2 billion, a decline of $36.3 billion compared to $557.5 billion at December 31, 2012. The reduction in UPB resulted primarily from liquidations and is consistent with our efforts to reduce the size of our mortgage-related investments portfolio as described above. The mortgage-related investments portfolio is comprised of agency securities, single-family non-agency mortgage-related securities, CMBS, housing revenue bonds, and single-family and multifamily unsecuritized mortgage loans.

We consider the liquidity of the assets in our mortgage-related investments portfolio based on three categories: (a) agency securities; (b) assets that are less liquid than agency securities; and (c) illiquid assets. Assets that we consider to be less liquid than agency securities include unsecuritized performing single-family mortgage loans, multifamily mortgage loans, CMBS, and housing revenue bonds. Our less liquid assets collectively represented approximately 26% of the UPB of the portfolio at June 30, 2013, compared to 28% at December 31, 2012. Assets that we consider to be illiquid include unsecuritized seriously delinquent and modified single-family mortgage loans which we removed from PC trusts, and our investments in non-agency mortgage-related securities backed by subprime, option ARM, and Alt-A and other loans. Our illiquid assets collectively represented approximately 35% of the UPB of the portfolio at both June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments

Two bills were recently introduced in the Senate and the House of Representatives to restructure the mortgage finance system, both of which provide for the wind down of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. A third bill was introduced to amend the Purchase Agreement. We anticipate that other bills related to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and the future of the mortgage finance system will be introduced. We cannot predict whether any of such bills might be enacted. For more information, see “LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY MATTERS — Legislation Related to Freddie Mac and its Future Status.”

Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA⁽¹⁾

The selected financial data presented below should be reviewed in conjunction with MD&A and our consolidated financial statements and related notes.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our consolidated results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including the accompanying notes. Also see “CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES” for information concerning certain significant accounting policies and estimates applied in determining our reported results of operations.

Table 5 — Summary Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income