FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION FANNIE MAE - Quarter Report: 2022 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 0-50231

Federal National Mortgage Association

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Fannie Mae

Federally chartered corporation

52-0883107

1100 15th Street, NW

800

232-6643

Washington,

20005

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	N/A	N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☑

Accelerated filer

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☐

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes☐ No ☑

As of July 15, 2022, there were 1,158,087,567 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
		Page
PART I—Financial Information		1
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	69
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income	70
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	71
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	72
	Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	74
	Note 2—Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets	79
	Note 3—Mortgage Loans	81
	Note 4—Allowance for Loan Losses	94
	Note 5—Investments in Securities	97
	Note 6—Financial Guarantees	100
	Note 7—Short-Term and Long-Term Debt	100
	Note 8—Derivative Instruments	102
	Note 9—Segment Reporting	107
	Note 10—Concentrations of Credit Risk	109
	Note 11—Netting Arrangements	113
	Note 12—Fair Value	114
	Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies	125
	Note 14—Regulatory Capital Requirements	126
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1
	Introduction	1
	Executive Summary	2
	Summary of Our Financial Performance	2
	Liquidity Provided in the First Half of 2022	4
	Legislation and Regulation	4
	Key Market Economic Indicators	6
	Consolidated Results of Operations	10
	Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis	21
	Retained Mortgage Portfolio	22
	Guaranty Book of Business	24
	Business Segments	25
	Single-Family Business	26
	Single-Family Mortgage Market	26
	Single-Family Market Activity	26
	Single-Family Business Metrics	27
	Single-Family Business Financial Results	28
	Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management	30
	Multifamily Business	44
	Multifamily Mortgage Market	44
	Multifamily Business Metrics	44
	Multifamily Business Financial Results	46
	Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management	47
	Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information	51
	Liquidity and Capital Management	52

	Risk Management	59
	Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management	59
	Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management	60
	Critical Accounting Estimates	62
	Impact of Future Adoption of New Accounting Guidance	65


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						i


	Forward-Looking Statements	65
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	128
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	128
PART II—Other Information		130
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	130
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	131
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	132
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	134
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	134
Item 5.	Other Information	134
Item 6.	Exhibits	134


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						ii


						MD&A \| Introduction

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations



			We have been under conservatorship, with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) acting as conservator, since September 6, 2008. As conservator, FHFA succeeded to all rights, titles, powers and privileges of the company, and of any shareholder, officer or director of the company with respect to the company and its assets. The conservator has since provided for the exercise of certain functions and authorities by our Board of Directors. Our directors owe their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty solely to the conservator. Thus, while we are in conservatorship, the Board has no fiduciary duties to the company or its stockholders.
			We do not know when or how the conservatorship will terminate, what further changes to our business will be made during or following conservatorship, what form we will have and what ownership interest, if any, our current common and preferred stockholders will hold in us after the conservatorship is terminated or whether we will continue to exist following conservatorship. Members of Congress and the Administration continue to express the importance of housing finance system reform.
			We are not currently permitted to pay dividends or other distributions to stockholders. Our agreements with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) include a commitment from Treasury to provide us with funds to maintain a positive net worth under specified conditions; however, the U.S. government does not guarantee our securities or other obligations. Our agreements with Treasury also include covenants that significantly restrict our business activities. For additional information on the conservatorship, the uncertainty of our future, and our agreements with Treasury, see “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform” and “Risk Factors—GSE and Conservatorship Risk” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”).

You should read this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes in this report and the more detailed information in our 2021 Form 10-K. You can find a “Glossary of Terms Used in This Report” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Forward-looking statements in this report are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to significant uncertainties and changes in circumstances, as we describe in “Forward-Looking Statements.” Future events and our future results may differ materially from those reflected in our forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including those discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Introduction

Fannie Mae is a leading source of financing for mortgages in the United States, with $4.3 trillion in assets as of June 30, 2022. Organized as a government-sponsored entity, Fannie Mae is a shareholder-owned corporation. Our charter is an act of Congress, which establishes that our purposes are to provide liquidity and stability to the residential mortgage market and to promote access to mortgage credit. We were initially established in 1938.

Our revenues are primarily driven by guaranty fees we receive for assuming the credit risk on loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities we issue. We do not originate loans or lend money directly to borrowers. Rather, we work primarily with lenders who originate loans to borrowers. We securitize those loans into Fannie Mae mortgage-backed securities that we guarantee (which we refer to as Fannie Mae MBS or our MBS).

Effectively managing credit risk is key to our business. In exchange for assuming credit risk on the loans we acquire, we receive guaranty fees. These fees take into account the credit risk characteristics of the loans we acquire. Guaranty fees are set at the time we acquire loans and do not change over the life of the loan. How long a loan remains in our guaranty book is heavily dependent on interest rates. When interest rates decrease, a larger portion of our book of business turns over as more loans refinance. On the other hand, as interest rates increase, fewer loans refinance and our book turns over more slowly. Since guaranty fees are set at the time a loan is originated, the impact of any change in guaranty fees on future revenues depends on the rates at which loans in our book of business turn over and new loans are added.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						1


			MD&A \| Executive Summary

Executive Summary

Summary of Our Financial Performance

•Net revenues decreased $0.5 billion in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, primarily due to lower amortization income as a result of a higher interest rate environment in the second quarter of 2022, which slowed refinancing activity driving lower prepayment volumes. This was partially offset by higher base guaranty fee income due to higher average charged guaranty fees and an increase in the size of our guaranty book of business, as well as an increase in income from portfolios primarily due to higher yields on assets in our other investments portfolio in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021.

•Net income decreased $2.5 billion in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, driven primarily by a shift to credit-related expense in the second quarter of 2022 from credit-related income in the second quarter of 2021.

•Net worth increased to $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 from $51.8 billion as of March 31, 2022. The increase is attributable to $4.6 billion of comprehensive income for the second quarter of 2022.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						2


			MD&A \| Executive Summary

•Net revenues increased by $0.2 billion, in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021, primarily due to higher base guaranty fee income driven by higher average charged guaranty fees and an increase in the size of our guaranty book of business, as well as higher income from portfolios. This was partially offset by lower amortization income as a result of a higher interest rate environment in the first half of 2022, which slowed refinancing activity driving lower prepayment volumes.

•Net income decreased $3.1 billion in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021, primarily driven by a shift to credit-related expense in the first half of 2022 from credit-related income in the first half of 2021.

•Net worth increased to $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 from $47.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. The increase is attributable to $9.1 billion of comprehensive income for the first half of 2022.

Financial Performance Outlook

We expect lower amortization income in 2022 compared with 2021, driven by reduced refinancing activity due to a higher mortgage interest-rate environment in 2022. In addition, we expect modest credit-related expense in 2022 compared with significant credit-related income in 2021. We expect those factors to result in lower net income in 2022 compared with 2021. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for a discussion of how home prices, interest rates and other macroeconomic factors can affect our financial results.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						3


			MD&A \| Executive Summary

Liquidity Provided in the First Half of 2022

Through our single-family and multifamily business segments, we provided $447 billion in liquidity to the mortgage market in the first half of 2022, enabling the financing of approximately 1.7 million home purchases, refinancings and rental units.

Fannie Mae Provided $447 Billion in Liquidity in the First Half of 2022

Unpaid Principal Balance

Units

$215B

646K

Single-Family Home Purchases

$197B

727K

Single-Family Refinancings

$35B

292K

Multifamily Rental Units

We continued our commitment to green financing in the first half of 2022, issuing a total of $5.2 billion in multifamily green MBS, $767 million in single-family green MBS, and $781 million in multifamily green resecuritizations. We also issued $4.7 billion in multifamily social MBS and $381 million in multifamily social resecuritizations in the first half of 2022. These green and social bonds were issued in alignment with our Sustainable Bond Framework, which guides our issuances of sustainable debt bonds and sustainable MBS that support energy and water efficiency and housing affordability.

Legislation and Regulation

The information in this section updates and supplements information regarding legislative, regulatory, conservatorship and other developments affecting our business set forth in “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform” and “Business—Legislation and Regulation” in our 2021 Form 10-K, as well as in “MD&A—Legislation and Regulation” in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (“First Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q”). Also see “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K and in this report for discussions of risks relating to legislative and regulatory matters.

Equitable Housing Finance Plan

In June 2022, we released our first Equitable Housing Finance Plan, which provides a three-year roadmap for our actions to advance equity in housing finance by working to remove barriers to affordable rental housing and homeownership experienced by members of underserved populations, particularly racial and ethnic groups with a significant homeownership rate disparity. Fannie Mae's Equitable Housing Finance Plan focuses on empowering Black renters and homeowners in three key areas:

•Housing Preparation: Helping Black consumers prepare early for sustainable homeownership and access to quality rental housing through credit building and financial education.

•Buying or Renting: Removing unnecessary obstacles Black people face in shopping for, acquiring, renting, or mortgaging a home.

•Moving in and Maintaining: Enhancing sustainable homeownership so that renters and homeowners can withstand disruptions or temporary hardships and remain stably housed.

We are focusing in this initial plan on the needs of Black homeowners and renters, a population for whom inequities caused by past discriminatory housing practices are particularly profound. While our solutions seek to address the effects of discrimination against Black homeowners and renters, we expect they will benefit borrowers and renters in all populations. In the future, we expect to expand the focus of our equitable housing efforts to address challenges faced by other populations who have been historically underserved by the housing finance system, including Latino homeowners and renters.

Amendment to Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework: Public Disclosure

In June 2022, FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework by introducing new public disclosure requirements. The requirements include quarterly quantitative and annual qualitative disclosures


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						4


			MD&A \| Legislation and Regulation

related to risk management, corporate governance, capital structure, and capital requirements and buffers under the framework’s standardized approach. We expect to provide our first reporting under the rule, based on data as of December 31, 2022, in February 2023.

Amendment to Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework: Annual Capital Plans

In June 2022, FHFA published a final rule that requires us to submit annual capital plans to FHFA and provide prior notice for certain capital actions. The rule also incorporates the determination of the stress capital buffer into the capital planning process.

The final rule mandates that our capital plans include:

•an assessment of the expected sources and uses of capital over the planning horizon;

•estimates of projected revenues, expenses, losses, reserves, and pro forma capital levels under a range of scenarios;

•a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon;

•a discussion of how we will, under expected and stressful conditions, maintain capital commensurate with the business risks and continue to serve the housing market; and

•a discussion of any expected changes to our business plan that are likely to have a material impact on our capital adequacy or liquidity.

The rule requires that we submit our first capital plan by May 20, 2023.

Upfront Fee for Commingled Securities and Review of the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework

On June 14, 2022, we announced a new upfront fee of 50 basis points to create structured securities that include Freddie Mac securities, effective July 1, 2022. We imposed the fee to partially address the cost of capital we are required to hold to guarantee Freddie Mac’s securities. Freddie Mac imposed a similar fee.

On June 23, 2022, FHFA Director Sandra L. Thompson issued a statement regarding the fees in which she affirmed FHFA’s ongoing commitment to Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities, or UMBS®, the common mortgage-backed securities issued by both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In her statement, Director Thompson indicated that FHFA would continue to monitor UMBS and the to-be-announced (“TBA”) market to ensure they function as intended and that FHFA would continue regular engagement with stakeholders. On June 30, 2022, FHFA issued a follow-up statement indicating that, in light of extensive engagement with mortgage market participants since the announcement of the fee and FHFA’s ongoing commitment to UMBS, FHFA would explore alternatives to ensure the long-term viability of UMBS, including conducting a review of the enterprise regulatory capital framework in the near-term to ensure the framework appropriately reflects the risks of commingled securities. For additional information about UMBS and our structured securities that include Freddie Mac securities, please see “Guaranty Book of Business” in this report and “Business—Mortgage Securitizations—Uniform Mortgage-Backed Securities, or UMBS” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Appointment of FHFA Director

On June 22, 2022, Sandra L. Thompson was sworn in as the Director of FHFA, following confirmation of her appointment by the Senate in May. Director Thompson had been the Acting Director of FHFA since June 2021.

LIBOR Transition: Proposed Federal Rulemaking

On July 19, 2022, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) published proposed regulations that provide default rules for certain contracts that use LIBOR as the benchmark reference interest rate. The proposed rules implement the “Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act” (the “LIBOR Act”), which President Biden signed into law in March 2022. The LIBOR Act establishes a clear and uniform process for replacing LIBOR as the benchmark reference interest rate in existing contracts that do not contain a clearly defined or practicable replacement benchmark rate for when LIBOR is discontinued. LIBOR is currently expected to no longer be published after June 30, 2023. Under the proposed rules, references to the most common tenors of LIBOR in these contracts will be replaced as a matter of law, without the need to be amended, to instead reference the benchmark interest rate identified by the Federal Reserve in the proposal.

The replacement benchmark rates identified by the Federal Reserve in the proposal are based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) and include appropriate “tenor spread adjustments” to reflect historical spreads between LIBOR and SOFR. The proposal provides for separate replacement benchmark rates for derivatives transactions, consumer loans, contracts where a government-sponsored entity is a party, and all other affected


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						5


			MD&A \| Legislation and Regulation

contracts. For our LIBOR derivatives trades that mature after June 2023, the related contracts provide that LIBOR will be replaced with SOFR once LIBOR ceases to be published, and these contract provisions are the same as the replacement provisions contained in the proposed rules. For consumer loans, such as single-family adjustable-rate mortgage loans and related MBS, the Federal Reserve has proposed as the LIBOR benchmark replacement (1) a term SOFR rate with the same term as the LIBOR rate that is being replaced (such as 12-month term SOFR to replace 12-month term LIBOR) plus (2) the applicable tenor spread adjustment specified in the proposed rules. For non-consumer contracts where Fannie Mae is a party, such as our multifamily loans and securities, Connecticut Avenue Securities® and REMIC securities, the Federal Reserve has proposed as the LIBOR benchmark replacement (1) the 30-day average SOFR rate plus (2) the applicable tenor spread adjustment specified in the proposed rules. Comments on the proposed rule are due 30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register.

The LIBOR Act establishes a safe harbor for market participants that act in accordance with such legislation, shielding them from litigation for selecting and implementing the Federal Reserve-identified replacement rate and related conforming changes. The LIBOR Act and the proposed rule, if adopted as proposed, reduce the risks to us associated with the approaching cessation of LIBOR.

Key Market Economic Indicators

Below we discuss how varying macroeconomic conditions can influence our financial results across different business and economic environments. Our forecasts and expectations are based on many assumptions, subject to many uncertainties and may change, perhaps substantially, from our current forecasts and expectations. For further discussion on housing activity, see “Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Market” and “Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Market.”

Selected Benchmark Interest Rates

(1)Refers to the U.S. weekly average fixed-rate mortgage rate according to Freddie Mac's Primary Mortgage Market Survey®. These rates are reported using the latest available data for a given period.

(2)According to Bloomberg.

(3)Refers to the daily rate per the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						6


			MD&A \| Key Market Economic Indicators

How Interest Rates Can Affect Our Financial Results

•Net interest income. In a rising interest-rate environment, our other investments portfolio and certain mortgage-related assets earn more interest income while our mortgage loans tend to prepay more slowly. We amortize various cost basis adjustments over the life of the mortgage loan, including those relating to loan-level price adjustments we receive as upfront fees at the time we acquire single-family loans. As a result, any prepayment of a loan results in an accelerated realization of those upfront fees as income. Therefore, as loan prepayments slow, the accelerated realization of amortization income also slows. Conversely, in a declining interest-rate environment, our other investments portfolio and certain mortgage-related assets earn less interest income while our mortgage loans tend to prepay faster, typically resulting in the opposite trend of higher net amortization income from cost basis adjustments on mortgage loans and related debt.

•Fair value gains (losses). We have exposure to fair value gains and losses resulting from changes in interest rates, primarily through our mortgage commitment derivatives and risk management derivatives, which we mark to market through earnings. Fair value gains and losses on our mortgage commitment derivatives fluctuate depending on how interest rates and prices move between the time a commitment is opened and when it settles. The net position and composition across the yield curve of our risk management derivatives changes over time. As a result, interest rate changes (increases or decreases) and yield curve changes (parallel, steepening or flattening shifts) will generate varying amounts of fair value gains or losses in a given period.

•Credit-related income (expense). Increases in mortgage interest rates tend to lengthen the expected lives of our loans, which generally increases the expected impairment and provision for credit losses on loans, particularly those modified in troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) arrangements. Decreases in mortgage interest rates tend to shorten the expected lives of our loans, which reduces the impairment and provision for credit losses on such loans. See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” and “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information on our adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures (“ASU 2022-02”) on January 1, 2022, resulting in the prospective discontinuation of TDR accounting, and its impact on our financial results.

Single-Family Quarterly Home Price Growth Rate(1)

(1)Calculated internally using property data on loans purchased by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other third-party home sales data. Fannie Mae’s home price index is a weighted repeat-transactions index, measuring average price changes in repeat sales on the same properties. Fannie Mae’s home price index excludes prices on properties sold in foreclosure. Fannie Mae’s home price estimates are based on preliminary data and are subject to change as additional data becomes available.

How Home Prices Can Affect Our Financial Results

•Actual and forecasted home prices impact our provision or benefit for credit losses as well as the growth and size of our guaranty book of business.

•Changes in home prices affect the amount of equity that borrowers have in their homes. Borrowers with less equity typically have higher delinquency and default rates.

•As home prices increase, the severity of losses we incur on defaulted loans that we hold or guarantee decreases because the amount we can recover from the properties securing the loans increases. Declines in home prices increase the losses we incur on defaulted loans.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						7


			MD&A \| Key Market Economic Indicators

•As home prices rise, the principal balance of loans associated with purchase money mortgages may increase, causing growth in the size of our guaranty book. Additionally, rising home prices can increase the amount of equity borrowers have in their home, which may lead to an increase in origination volumes for cash-out refinance loans with higher principal balances than the existing loan. Replacing existing loans with newly acquired cash-out refinances can affect the growth and size of our guaranty book.

•Home price growth in the first half of 2022 was driven by low levels of housing supply relative to the level of demand. We believe some of this demand was driven by home buyers accelerating home purchases in the first quarter in anticipation of mortgage interest-rate increases.

•Our most recent forecast of home price growth is that it will slow from an estimated annual growth rate of 18.9% in 2021 to 16.0% in 2022, with most of this growth having already occurred in the first half of the year. Some recent market indicators suggest that home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than indicated by our home price forecast. We expect slower home price growth in the second half of 2022 and in 2023, driven by elevated mortgage interest rates, a slowing economy and reduced affordability, especially for low- and moderate-income borrowers. Some regions of the country may also experience home price declines in the latter half of 2022.

New Housing Starts(1)

(1)According to U.S. Census Bureau and subject to revision.

How Housing Activity Can Affect Our Financial Results

•Two key aspects of economic activity that can impact supply and demand for housing and thus mortgage lending are the rates of household formation and housing construction.

•Household formation is a key driver of demand for both single-family and multifamily housing as a newly formed household will either rent or purchase a home. Thus, changes in the pace of household formation can affect prices and credit performance as well as the degree of loss on defaulted loans.

•Growth of household formation stimulates homebuilding. Homebuilding has typically been a cyclical leader, weakening prior to a slowdown in U.S. economic activity and accelerating prior to a recovery, which contributes to the growth of GDP and employment. However, the housing sector’s performance may vary from its historical precedent due to the many uncertainties surrounding future economic or housing policy as well as the impact of labor and material shortages on the economy and the housing market.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						8


			MD&A \| Key Market Economic Indicators

•With regard to housing construction, a decline in housing starts results in fewer new homes being available for purchase and potentially a lower volume of mortgage originations. Construction activity can also affect credit losses through its impact on home prices. If the growth of demand exceeds the growth of supply, prices will appreciate and impact the risk profile of newly originated home purchase mortgages, depending on where in the housing cycle the market is. A reduced pace of construction is often associated with a broader economic slowdown and may signal expected increases in delinquency and losses on defaulted loans.

•We expect that elevated mortgage rates leading to diminished home purchase affordability, alongside slowing economic growth, will constrain home sales through the remainder of 2022. Additionally, the pace of new construction continues to be affected by supply chain disruptions and labor shortages. Given these constraints, we expect both single-family home sales and housing starts to decline in 2022 compared with 2021.

GDP, Unemployment Rate and Personal Consumption

(1)Real GDP growth (decline) and personal consumption growth (decline) are based on the quarterly series calculated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis and are subject to revision.

(2)According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and subject to revision.

How GDP, the Unemployment Rate and Personal Consumption Can Affect Our Financial Results

•Changes in GDP, the unemployment rate and personal consumption can affect several mortgage market factors, including the demand for both single-family and multifamily housing and the level of loan delinquencies, which in turn can lead to credit losses.

•Economic growth is a key factor for the performance of mortgage-related assets. In a growing economy, employment and income are typically rising, thus allowing borrowers to meet payment requirements, existing homeowners to consider purchasing and moving to another home, and renters to consider becoming homeowners. Homebuilding typically increases to meet the rise in demand. Mortgage delinquencies typically fall in an expanding economy, thereby decreasing credit losses.

•In a slowing economy, employment, income growth and housing activity typically slow as an early indicator of reduced economic activity. Typically, as an economic slowdown intensifies, households reduce their spending.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						9


			MD&A \| Key Market Economic Indicators

This reduction in consumption then accelerates the slowdown. An economic slowdown can lead to employment losses, impairing the ability of borrowers and renters to meet mortgage and rental payments, thus causing loan delinquencies to rise. Home sales and mortgage originations also typically fall in a slowing economy.

•While GDP declined in the first half of 2022, we currently expect modest GDP growth for the remainder of the year, resulting in minimal GDP growth for 2022. We expect that a modest recession is likely to occur beginning in the first quarter of 2023, resulting in an increase in the unemployment rate. We expect our economic outlook will be influenced by a number of factors that are subject to change, such as the persistence of inflationary pressures, the speed at which expected monetary policy tightening is adjusted, the impact of the Russian war in Ukraine on the global economy, the continuance of supply chain disruptions, the degree to which labor supply expands, and other potential impacts of the continued COVID-19 pandemic.

See “Risk Factors” in this report and “Risk Factors—Market and Industry Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for further discussion of risks to our business and financial results associated with interest rates, home prices, housing activity and economic conditions.

Consolidated Results of Operations

This section discusses our condensed consolidated results of operations and should be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.


Summary of Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,

	2022		2021		Variance		2022		2021		Variance
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income	$	7,808	$	8,286	$	(478)	$	15,207	$	15,028	$	179
Fee and other income	81		103		(22)		164		190		(26)
Net revenues	7,889		8,389		(500)		15,371		15,218		153
Investment gains (losses), net	(49)		646		(695)		(151)		691		(842)
Fair value gains (losses), net	529		(446)		975		1,009		338		671
Administrative expenses	(795)		(746)		(49)		(1,603)		(1,494)		(109)
Credit-related income (expense):
Benefit (provision) for credit losses	(218)		2,588		(2,806)		(458)		3,353		(3,811)
Foreclosed property income (expense)	(33)		(41)		8		6		(36)		42
Total credit-related income (expense)	(251)		2,547		(2,798)		(452)		3,317		(3,769)
TCCA fees(1)	(841)		(758)		(83)		(1,665)		(1,489)		(176)
Credit enhancement expense(2)	(332)		(274)		(58)		(610)		(558)		(52)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries(3)	(47)		(44)		(3)		13		(75)		88
Other expenses, net(4)	(228)		(280)		52		(464)		(599)		135
Income before federal income taxes	5,875		9,034		(3,159)		11,448		15,349		(3,901)
Provision for federal income taxes	(1,222)		(1,882)		660		(2,387)		(3,204)		817
Net income	$	4,653	$	7,152	$	(2,499)	$	9,061	$	12,145	$	(3,084)
Total comprehensive income	$	4,649	$	7,120	$	(2,471)	$	9,050	$	12,086	$	(3,036)

(1)TCCA fees refers to the expense recognized as a result of the 10 basis point increase in guaranty fees on all single-family residential mortgages delivered to us on or after April 1, 2012 pursuant to the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 and as extended by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which we remit to Treasury. For more information on TCCA fees, see “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Related Parties—Transactions with Treasury.”

(2)Consists of costs associated with our freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily include our Connecticut Avenue Securities® (“CAS”) and Credit Insurance Risk TransferTM (“CIRTTM”) programs, enterprise-paid mortgage insurance (“EPMI”) and certain lender risk-sharing programs.

(3)Includes estimated changes in benefits from our freestanding credit enhancements as well as any realized amounts.

(4)Consists of debt extinguishment gains and losses, housing trust fund expenses, loan subservicing costs, servicer fees paid in connection with certain loss mitigation activities, and gains and losses from partnership investments.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						10


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Our primary source of net interest income is guaranty fees we receive for managing the credit risk on loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS held by third parties.

Guaranty fees consist of two primary components:

•base guaranty fees that we receive over the life of the loan; and

•upfront fees that we receive at the time of loan acquisition primarily related to single-family loan-level price adjustments and other fees we receive from lenders, which are amortized into net interest income as cost basis adjustments over the contractual life of the loan. We refer to this as amortization income.

We recognize almost all of our guaranty fee revenue in net interest income because we consolidate the substantial majority of loans underlying our Fannie Mae MBS in consolidated trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Guaranty fees from these loans account for the difference between the interest income on loans in consolidated trusts and the interest expense on the debt of consolidated trusts.

The timing of when we recognize amortization income can vary based on a number of factors, the most significant of which is a change in mortgage interest rates. In a rising interest-rate environment, our mortgage loans tend to prepay more slowly, which typically results in lower net amortization income. Conversely, in a declining interest-rate environment, our mortgage loans tend to prepay faster, typically resulting in higher net amortization income.

We also recognize net interest income on the difference between interest income earned on the assets in our retained mortgage portfolio and our other investments portfolio (collectively, our “portfolios”) and the interest expense associated with the debt that funds those assets. See “Retained Mortgage Portfolio” and “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management—Other Investments Portfolio” for more information about our portfolios.

We recognize fair value changes attributable to movements in benchmark interest rates for mortgage loans and funding debt, and for related interest-rate swaps in hedging relationships, as a component of net interest income, including the amortization of hedge-related basis adjustments on mortgage loans or funding debt and any related interest accrual on the swaps. The income or expense associated with this activity is presented in the “Income from hedge accounting” line item in the table below. See “MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations—Hedge Accounting Impact” and “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information about our hedge accounting program.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						11


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

The table below displays the components of our net interest income from our guaranty book of business, which we discuss in “Guaranty Book of Business,” and from our portfolios, as well as from hedge accounting.


Components of Net Interest Income
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		2022		2021		Variance
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income from guaranty book of business:
Base guaranty fee income(1)	$	4,078	$	3,420	$	658	$	7,975	$	6,617	$	1,358
Base guaranty fee income related to TCCA fees(2)	841		758		83		1,665		1,489		176
Net amortization income(3)	2,121		3,736		(1,615)		4,495		6,262		(1,767)
Total net interest income from guaranty book of business	7,040		7,914		(874)		14,135		14,368		(233)
Net interest income from portfolios(4)	711		306		405		953		572		381
Income from hedge accounting	57		66		(9)		119		88		31
Total net interest income	$	7,808	$	8,286	$	(478)	$	15,207	$	15,028	$	179

Income from hedge accounting included in net interest income:
Fair value gains (losses) on designated risk management derivatives in fair value hedges	$	(231)	$	317	$	(548)	$	(1,528)	$	(861)	$	(667)
Fair value gains (losses) on hedged mortgage loans held for investment and debt of Fannie Mae(5)	404		(284)		688		1,789		875		914
Contractual interest income (expense) accruals related to interest-rate swaps designated as hedging instruments	(2)		54		(56)		37		108		(71)
Discontinued hedge-related basis adjustment amortization	(114)		(21)		(93)		(179)		(34)		(145)
Total income from hedge accounting in net interest income	$	57	$	66	$	(9)	$	119	$	88	$	31

(1)Excludes revenues generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us.

(2)Represents revenues generated by the 10 basis point guaranty fee increase we implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us.

(3)Net amortization income refers primarily to the amortization of premiums and discounts on mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts. These cost basis adjustments represent the difference between the initial fair value and the carrying value of these instruments as well as upfront fees we receive at the time of loan acquisition. It does not include the amortization of cost basis adjustments resulting from hedge accounting, which is included in income from hedge accounting.

(4)Includes interest income from assets held in our retained mortgage portfolio and our other investments portfolio, as well as other assets used to support lender liquidity. Also includes interest expense on our outstanding Connecticut Avenue Securities debt.

(5)Amounts are recorded as cost basis adjustments on the hedged loans or debt and amortized over the hedged item’s remaining contractual life beginning at the termination of the hedging relationship. See “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” for additional information on the effect of our fair value hedge accounting program and related disclosures.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						12


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

Net interest income decreased in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, primarily as a result of lower net amortization income, partially offset by higher base guaranty fee income and higher income from portfolios. Net interest income increased in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021, primarily as a result of higher base guaranty fee income and higher income from portfolios, partially offset by lower net amortization income. More specifically, our net interest income was impacted in the periods by:

•Lower net amortization income. Throughout the second quarter and first half of 2022, we were in a higher interest-rate environment and observed lower volumes of refinancing activity compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, which drove fewer prepayments. Lower prepayment volumes result in a slower turnover of our book of business. As a result, we had lower amortization income in the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, with most of the decrease in amortization income occurring in the second quarter of 2022.

•Higher base guaranty fee income. An increase in the size of our guaranty book of business combined with higher average charged guaranty fees were the primary drivers of the increase in base guaranty fee income for the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021.

•Higher income from portfolios. Higher income from portfolios in the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, was primarily driven by higher yields on assets in our other investments portfolio as a result of increases in interest rates as well as a decrease in interest expense on our funding debt due to a decrease in the average outstanding balance.

We expect refinancing activity to be significantly lower throughout 2022 compared with 2021 levels as we expect interest rates to remain elevated throughout 2022, resulting in fewer borrowers who may benefit from refinancing. As a result, we expect lower amortization income in 2022 compared with 2021.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						13


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

Analysis of Net Interest Income

The table below displays an analysis of our net interest income, average balances and related yields earned on assets and incurred on liabilities. For most components of the average balances, we use a daily weighted average of unpaid principal balance net of unamortized cost basis adjustments. When daily average balance information is not available, such as for mortgage loans, we use monthly averages.


Analysis of Net Interest Income and Yield(1)
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2022						2021
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ (Expense)		Average Rates Earned/Paid		Average Balance		Interest Income/ (Expense)		Average Rates Earned/Paid
	(Dollars in millions)
Interest-earning assets:
Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae	$	63,702	$	945	5.93	%	$	99,364	$	782	3.15	%
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts	4,021,070		28,137		2.80		3,712,015		24,150		2.60
Total mortgage loans(2)	4,084,772		29,082		2.85		3,811,379		24,932		2.62
Mortgage-related securities	4,994		34		2.72		6,637		42		2.53
Non-mortgage-related securities(3)	131,686		284		0.86		132,921		98		0.29
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	16,171		28		0.69		61,428		4		0.03
Advances to lenders	5,508		27		1.96		7,910		31		1.57
Total interest-earning assets	$	4,243,131	$	29,455	2.78	%	$	4,020,275	$	25,107	2.50	%
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Short-term funding debt	$	3,125	$	(5)	0.64	%	$	3,790	$	(1)	0.11	%
Long-term funding debt	143,064		(539)		1.51		246,045		(673)		1.09
CAS debt	10,046		(128)		5.10		14,321		(149)		4.16
Total debt of Fannie Mae	156,235		(672)		1.72		264,156		(823)		1.25
Debt securities of consolidated trusts held by third parties	4,024,468		(20,975)		2.08		3,742,947		(15,998)		1.71
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,180,703	$	(21,647)	2.07	%	$	4,007,103	$	(16,821)	1.68	%
Net interest income/net interest yield			$	7,808	0.74	%			$	8,286	0.81	%


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						14


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022						2021
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ (Expense)		Average Rates Earned/Paid		Average Balance		Interest Income/ (Expense)		Average Rates Earned/Paid
	(Dollars in millions)
Interest-earning assets:
Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae	$	65,006	$	1,574	4.84	%	$	103,372	$	1,607	3.11	%
Mortgage loans of consolidated trusts	3,983,347		54,650		2.74		3,658,573		46,678		2.55
Total mortgage loans(2)	4,048,353		56,224		2.78		3,761,945		48,285		2.57
Mortgage-related securities	5,234		57		2.18		7,018		84		2.39
Non-mortgage-related securities(3)	141,707		427		0.60		148,576		215		0.29
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	18,260		34		0.37		60,769		12		0.04
Advances to lenders	6,233		53		1.69		9,438		73		1.54
Total interest-earning assets	$	4,219,787	$	56,795	2.69	%	$	3,987,746	$	48,669	2.44	%
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Short-term funding debt	$	4,019	$	(6)	0.30	%	$	6,768	$	(4)	0.12	%
Long-term funding debt	158,158		(1,089)		1.38		252,853		(1,433)		1.13
CAS debt	10,444		(247)		4.73		14,561		(302)		4.15
Total debt of Fannie Mae	172,621		(1,342)		1.55		274,182		(1,739)		1.27
Debt securities of consolidated trusts held by third parties	3,995,645		(40,246)		2.01		3,693,674		(31,902)		1.73
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	4,168,266	$	(41,588)	2.00	%	$	3,967,856	$	(33,641)	1.70	%
Net interest income/net interest yield			$	15,207	0.72	%			$	15,028	0.75	%

(1)Includes the effects of discounts, premiums and other cost basis adjustments.

(2)Average balance includes mortgage loans on nonaccrual status. Interest income from yield maintenance revenue and the amortization of loan fees, primarily consisting of upfront cash fees, was $1.4 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, for the second quarter of 2022 and first half of 2022, compared with $2.4 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively, for the second quarter of 2021 and first half of 2021.

(3)Consists of cash, cash equivalents and U.S. Treasury securities.

Analysis of Deferred Amortization Income

We initially recognize mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The difference between the initial fair value and the carrying value of these instruments is recorded as a cost basis adjustment, either as a premium or a discount, in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We amortize these cost basis adjustments over the contractual lives of the loans or debt. On a net basis, for mortgage loans and debt of consolidated trusts, we are in a premium position with respect to debt of consolidated trusts, which represents deferred income we will recognize in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as amortization income in future periods.

Deferred Amortization Income Represented by Net Premium Position

on Debt of Consolidated Trusts

(Dollars in billions)


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						15


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

Investment Gains (Losses), Net

Investment gains (losses), net primarily includes gains and losses recognized on the sale of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities, the sale of loans, gains and losses recognized on the consolidation and deconsolidation of securities, and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on held-for-sale (“HFS”) loans.

The shift from net investment gains in the second quarter and first half of 2021 to net investment losses in the second quarter and first half of 2022 was primarily driven by a significant decrease in the volume of single-family reperforming loan sales coupled with lower loan sale prices in 2022.

Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

The estimated fair value of our derivatives, trading securities and other financial instruments carried at fair value may fluctuate substantially from period to period because of changes in interest rates, the yield curve, mortgage and credit spreads and implied volatility, as well as activity related to these financial instruments.

As discussed below in “Impact of Hedge Accounting on Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net,” we apply fair value hedge accounting to reduce earnings volatility in our financial statements driven by changes in interest rates. Accordingly, we recognize the fair value gains and losses and the contractual interest income and expense associated with risk management derivatives designated in qualifying hedging relationships in net interest income.

The table below displays the components of our fair value gains and losses, which includes the impact of hedge accounting.


Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses) attributable to:
Net contractual interest income (expense) on interest-rate swaps	$	(30)	$	61	$	(2)	$	104
Net change in fair value during the period	(219)		374		(1,702)		(637)


Impact of hedge accounting	233		(371)		1,491		753
Risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses), net	(16)		64		(213)		220
Mortgage commitment derivatives fair value gains (losses), net	844		(553)		2,416		529
Credit enhancement derivatives fair value losses, net	(29)		(18)		(51)		(108)
Total derivatives fair value gains (losses), net	799		(507)		2,152		641
Trading securities gains (losses), net	(665)		161		(2,435)		(597)
Long-term debt fair value gains (losses), net(1)	558		(89)		1,637		284
Other, net(2)	(163)		(11)		(345)		10
Fair value gains (losses), net	$	529	$	(446)	$	1,009	$	338

(1)Consists of fair value gains and losses on CAS and non-CAS debt held at fair value.

(2)Consists primarily of fair value gains and losses on mortgage loans held at fair value.

Fair value gains, net in the second quarter and first half of 2022 were primarily driven by:

•increases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives due to gains on commitments to sell mortgage-related securities as prices decreased during the commitment period due to rising interest rates and widening of the secondary spread, which is the spread between the 30-year MBS current coupon yield and 10-year U.S. Treasury rate; and

•gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, also due to rising interest rates and widening of the secondary spread.

These gains were partially offset by fair value losses in the second quarter and first half of 2022 on trading securities, primarily driven by increases in U.S. Treasury yields, which resulted in losses on fixed-rate securities held in our other investments portfolio.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						16


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

Fair value losses, net in the second quarter of 2021 were primarily driven by decreases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives due to losses on commitments to sell mortgage-related securities as prices increased during the commitment period as interest rates declined. These losses were partially offset by gains on trading securities due to decreases in U.S. Treasury yields during the second quarter of 2021, which resulted in gains on fixed-rate securities held in our other investments portfolio as prices rose.

Fair value gains, net in the first half of 2021 were primarily driven by:

•gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, due to increases in interest rates.

These gains were partially offset by fair value losses in the first half of 2021 on trading securities, primarily driven by increases in interest rates during the first quarter of 2021, which resulted in losses on fixed-rate securities held in our other investments portfolio.

Impact of Hedge Accounting on Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

Our earnings can experience volatility due to interest-rate changes and differing accounting treatments that apply to certain financial instruments on our balance sheet. To help address this volatility, we began applying fair value hedge accounting in January 2021 to reduce the current-period impact on our earnings related to changes in specified benchmark interest rates. Hedge accounting aligns the timing of when we recognize fair value changes in hedged items attributable to these benchmark interest-rate movements with fair value changes in the hedging instrument. For additional discussion on the purpose and structure of our hedge accounting program, see “Risk Management—Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management—Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk.”

The table below displays the amount of contractual interest accruals and fair value gains and losses related to designated interest-rate swaps in qualifying hedging relationships that are recognized in “Net interest income” rather than “Fair value gains (losses), net” as a result of hedge accounting. Derivatives not in hedging relationships are not affected.


Impact of Hedge Accounting on Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Net contractual interest income (expense) accruals related to interest-rate swaps designated as hedging instruments recognized in net interest income	$	(2)	$	54	$	37	$	108
Fair value gains (losses) on derivatives designated as hedging instruments recognized in net interest income	(231)		317		(1,528)		(861)
Fair value gains (losses), net recognized in net interest income from hedge accounting	$	(233)	$	371	$	(1,491)	$	(753)

Credit-Related Income (Expense)

Our credit-related income or expense can vary substantially from period to period based on a number of factors, such as changes in actual and forecasted home prices or property valuations, fluctuations in actual and forecasted interest rates, borrower payment behavior, events such as natural disasters or pandemics, the types, volume and effectiveness of our loss mitigation activities, including forbearances and loan modifications, the volume of foreclosures completed and the redesignation of loans from held for investment (“HFI”) to held for sale (“HFS”).

In recent periods, changes in actual and projected interest rates have been a significant driver of our credit-related income (expense) as these changes drive prepayment speeds, which impacts the measurement of the economic concessions granted to borrowers on modified loans. However, pursuant to our adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02 on January 1, 2022, we prospectively discontinued TDR accounting and no longer measure the economic concession for restructurings occurring on or after the adoption date. This accounting also results in the elimination of any existing economic concession related to a loan that was previously designated as a TDR if such loan is restructured on or after January 1, 2022. Although increases in interest rates were a meaningful driver of our credit-related expense in the first half of 2022, we expect the decrease in the balance of loans that were previously designated as TDRs will reduce the sensitivity of our credit-related income (expense) to interest rate volatility over time. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance” and “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” for more information about our adoption of ASU 2022-02.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						17


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

Our credit-related income or expense and our related loss reserves can also be impacted by updates to the models, assumptions and data used in determining our allowance for loan losses. Although we believe the estimates underlying our allowance as of June 30, 2022 are reasonable, they are subject to uncertainty. Changes in future economic conditions and loan performance from our current expectations may result in volatility in our allowance for loan losses and, as a result, our credit-related income or expense. See “Critical Accounting Estimates” for additional information about how our estimate of credit losses is subject to uncertainty.

Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses

The table below provides a quantitative analysis of the drivers of our single-family and multifamily benefit or provision for credit losses and the change in expected credit enhancement recoveries. The benefit or provision for credit losses includes our benefit or provision for loan losses, accrued interest receivable losses and our guaranty loss reserves, and excludes credit losses on our available for sale (“AFS”) securities. Many of the drivers that contribute to our benefit or provision for credit losses overlap or are interdependent. The attribution shown below is based on internal allocation estimates.


Components of Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses and Change in Expected Credit Enhancement Recoveries
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses:
Changes in loan activity(1)(2)	$	(252)	$	33	$	(591)	$	(30)
Redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS	(54)		678		(4)		985
Actual and forecasted home prices(3)	272		1,124		538		2,303
Actual and projected interest rates	(288)		304		(891)		(588)
Release of economic concessions(4)	203		—		603		—
Changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies(2)	—		210		—		337
Other(5)	(87)		204		(131)		208
Single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses	(206)		2,553		(476)		3,215
Multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses:
Changes in loan activity(1)(2)	21		(21)		11		(140)
Actual and projected interest rates	(112)		41		(161)		22
Actual and projected economic data	82		6		88		321
Estimated impact of the COVID-19 pandemic(2)	—		23		—		77
Other(5)	(3)		(14)		80		(142)
Multifamily benefit (provision) for credit losses	(12)		35		18		138
Total benefit (provision) for credit losses	$	(218)	$	2,588	$	(458)	$	3,353

Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries:(6)
Single-family	$	(43)	$	(57)	$	26	$	(73)
Multifamily	(4)		7		(13)		(15)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries for active loans	$	(47)	$	(50)	$	13	$	(88)

(1)Primarily consists of loan acquisitions, liquidations and amortization of modification concessions granted to borrowers and write-offs of amounts determined to be uncollectible. For multifamily, changes in loan activity also includes changes in the allowance due to loan delinquencies and the impact of changes in debt service coverage ratios (“DSCRs”) based on updated property financial information, which is used to assess loan credit quality.

(2)Beginning January 1, 2022, changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies are included in “Changes in loan activity.”

(3)For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, amounts attributed to actual and forecasted home prices include an adjustment to modeled results to reflect some recent market conditions that suggest home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than indicated by our home price forecast for the quarter.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						18


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

(4)Represents the benefit from the release of economic concessions related to loans previously designated as TDRs that received loss mitigation arrangements during the period due to the adoption of ASU 2022-02.

(5)Includes provision for allowance on accrued interest receivable. For single-family, also includes changes in the reserve for guaranty losses that are not separately included in the other components. For multifamily, also includes the impact of model enhancements implemented in the first quarter of 2021.

(6)Includes increase (decrease) in expected credit enhancement recoveries only for active loans. Recoveries received after foreclosure, which are included in “Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries” in “Summary of Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations,” are not included.

Single-Family Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses

The largest driver of our single-family provision for credit losses in the second quarter and first half of 2022 was an increase in actual and projected interest rates as of June 30, 2022 compared with March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. As mortgage rates increase, we expect a decrease in future prepayments on single-family loans, including modified loans accounted for as TDRs. Lower expected prepayments extend the expected lives of these TDR loans, which increases the expected impairment relating to economic concessions provided on them, resulting in a provision for credit losses.

Some of the provision from increased actual and projected interest rates in the first half of 2022 was offset by a benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth. While home price growth was strong in the second quarter and first half of 2022, some recent market indicators suggest that home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than indicated by our home price forecast, which reduced the benefit from home price growth recognized in the second quarter and first half of 2022. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional information about how home prices affect our credit loss estimates, including a discussion of home price appreciation and our home price forecast. Also see “Critical Accounting Estimates” for more information about our home price forecast.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for credit losses in the second quarter of 2021 were:

•Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth. During the second quarter of 2021, home price growth was very strong. We also increased our expectations for home price growth on a national basis for full-year 2021.

•Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS. We redesignated certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS, as we no longer intended to hold them for the foreseeable future or to maturity. Upon redesignation of these loans, we recorded the loans at the lower of cost or fair value with a write-off against the allowance for loan losses. Amounts recorded in the allowance related to these loans exceeded the amounts written off, resulting in a benefit for credit losses.

•Benefit from lower actual and projected interest rates. Actual and projected interest rates decreased as of June 30, 2021 compared with March 31, 2021.

•Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies as discussed below.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for credit losses in the first half of 2021 were:

•Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth.

•Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS consistent with the discussion above.

•Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies. In both the first and second quarters of 2021, management used its judgment to reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was previously applied to the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The decrease in uncertainty as of June 30, 2021 compared with the end of 2020 was primarily driven by the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provided additional economic stimulus and helped support continued economic recovery. In addition, the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination program in the United States contributed to a significant increase in business activity and an improved economy in 2021, decreased uncertainty surrounding the post-pandemic recovery. There was also decreased political uncertainty, as well as a decrease in the number of borrowers in a COVID-19-related forbearance, lessening expectations of credit losses. However, management continued to apply its judgment and supplemented model results as of June 30, 2021 as uncertainty remained regarding the loss mitigation outcomes of borrowers still in forbearance and the future course of the pandemic, including the impact on the economy of the spread of new variants of the virus and low vaccination rates in certain areas of the country.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						19


			MD&A \| Consolidated Results of Operations

The impact of the factors above was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and projected interest rates. Actual and projected interest rates were higher as of June 30, 2021 compared with December 31, 2020.

Multifamily Benefit (Provision) for Credit Losses

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily provision for credit losses in the second quarter of 2022 was a provision for higher actual and projected interest rates. This provision was partially offset by a benefit from actual and projected economic data, including strong property value growth, driven by continued demand for multifamily housing.

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily benefit for credit losses in the first half of 2022 was a benefit from actual and projected economic data. This benefit was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and projected interest rates.

The primary factors that contributed to our multifamily benefit for credit losses in the second quarter and first half of 2021 were:

•Benefit from actual and projected economic data. In the second quarter and first half of 2021, property value forecasts increased due to continued demand for multifamily housing. In addition, improved job growth led to an increase in projected average property net operating income, which reduced the probability of loan defaults, resulting in a benefit for credit losses for the second quarter and first half of 2021.

•Benefit from lower expected credit losses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to our single-family provision for credit losses described above, in both the first and second quarters of 2021, management used its judgment to further reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was previously applied to the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The remaining non-modeled adjustment as of June 30, 2021, reflected management’s judgment that uncertainty remained surrounding the subsequent course of the pandemic, including new strains of the virus and its effect on the economy.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						20


			MD&A \| Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

This section discusses our condensed consolidated balance sheets and should be read together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.


Summary of Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021		Variance
	(Dollars in millions)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents and securities purchased under agreements to resell	$	57,030	$	63,191	$	(6,161)
Restricted cash and cash equivalents	34,303		66,183		(31,880)
Investments in securities	65,576		89,043		(23,467)
Mortgage loans:
Of Fannie Mae	62,780		66,127		(3,347)
Of consolidated trusts	4,035,220		3,907,744		127,476
Allowance for loan losses	(6,069)		(5,629)		(440)
Mortgage loans, net of allowance for loan losses	4,091,931		3,968,242		123,689
Deferred tax assets, net	12,402		12,715		(313)
Other assets	27,725		29,792		(2,067)
Total assets	$	4,288,967	$	4,229,166	$	59,801
Liabilities and equity
Debt:
Of Fannie Mae	$	144,455	$	200,892	$	(56,437)
Of consolidated trusts	4,064,192		3,957,299		106,893
Other liabilities	23,913		23,618		295
Total liabilities	4,232,560		4,181,809		50,751
Fannie Mae stockholders’ equity:
Senior preferred stock	120,836		120,836		—
Other net deficit	(64,429)		(73,479)		9,050
Total equity	56,407		47,357		9,050
Total liabilities and equity	$	4,288,967	$	4,229,166	$	59,801

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Restricted cash and cash equivalents declined from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 primarily driven by a decrease in prepayments due to lower refinance volumes for loans of consolidated trusts, resulting in lower cash balances held in trust at period end. For information on our accounting policy for restricted cash and cash equivalents, see “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Investments in Securities

Investment in securities declined from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 as we used short-term liquid assets that accumulated in prior periods to fund our operations and to pay off maturing debt during the first half of 2022. For further discussion, see “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management.”

Mortgage Loans, Net of Allowance

The mortgage loans reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets are classified as either HFS or HFI and include loans owned by Fannie Mae and loans held in consolidated trusts.

Mortgage loans, net of allowance for loan losses increased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021, driven by loan acquisitions outpacing liquidations and sales.

For additional information on our mortgage loans, see “Note 3, Mortgage Loans,” and for additional information on changes in our allowance for loan losses, see “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses.”


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						21


			MD&A \| Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis

Debt

The decrease in debt of Fannie Mae from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 was primarily due to the maturity of long-term debt, which was not replaced with new issuances as our funding needs remained low. The increase in debt of consolidated trusts from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2022 was primarily driven by sales of Fannie Mae MBS, which are accounted for as issuances of debt of consolidated trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, since the MBS certificate ownership is transferred from us to a third party. See “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management—Debt Funding” for a summary of activity in short-term and long-term debt of Fannie Mae. Also see “Note 7, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt” for additional information on our total outstanding debt.

Stockholders’ Equity

Our stockholders’ equity (also referred to as our net worth) increased to $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022, compared with $47.4 billion as of December 31, 2021, due to the $9.1 billion in comprehensive income recognized during the first half of 2022.

The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increased to $173.3 billion as of June 30, 2022 and will further increase to $177.9 billion as of September 30, 2022 due to the $4.6 billion increase in our net worth during the second quarter of 2022. For more information about how this liquidation preference is determined, see “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform—Treasury Agreements—Senior Preferred Stock” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Liquidity and Capital Management—Capital Management—Capital Activity” in this report.

Retained Mortgage Portfolio

We use our retained mortgage portfolio primarily to provide liquidity to the mortgage market through our whole loan conduit and to support our loss mitigation activities, particularly in times of economic stress when other sources of liquidity to the mortgage market may decrease or withdraw. Previously, we also used our retained mortgage portfolio for investment purposes.

Our retained mortgage portfolio consists of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities that we own, including Fannie Mae MBS and non-Fannie Mae mortgage-related securities. Assets held by consolidated MBS trusts that back mortgage-related securities owned by third parties are not included in our retained mortgage portfolio.

The chart below separates the instruments within our retained mortgage portfolio, measured by unpaid principal balance, into three categories based on each instrument’s use:

•Lender liquidity, which includes balances related to our whole loan conduit activity, supports our efforts to provide liquidity to the single-family and multifamily mortgage markets.

•Loss mitigation supports our loss mitigation efforts through the purchase of delinquent loans from our MBS trusts.

•Other represents assets that were previously purchased for investment purposes. The majority of the balance of “Other” as of June 30, 2022 consisted of Fannie Mae reverse mortgage securities and reverse mortgage loans. We expect the amount of assets in “Other” will continue to decline over time as they liquidate, mature or are sold.

Retained Mortgage Portfolio

(Dollars in billions)

The decrease in our retained mortgage portfolio as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021 was primarily due to a decrease in our lender liquidity portfolio driven by sales of Fannie Mae securities and a decline in mortgage


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						22


			MD&A \| Retained Mortgage Portfolio

refinance activity leading to lower acquisition volumes through the whole loan conduit. This was partially offset by an increase in our loss mitigation portfolio driven by an increase in our purchase of delinquent loans from MBS trusts as they exit COVID-19-related forbearance.

The table below displays the components of our retained mortgage portfolio, measured by unpaid principal balance. Based on the nature of the asset, these balances are included in either “Investments in securities” or “Mortgage loans of Fannie Mae” in our Summary of Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets shown above.


Retained Mortgage Portfolio
	As of
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Lender liquidity:
Agency securities(1)		$	20,372		$	34,509
Mortgage loans		11,701			16,174
Total lender liquidity		32,073			50,683
Loss mitigation mortgage loans(2)		41,864			37,601
Other:
Reverse mortgage loans		7,218			9,908
Mortgage loans		3,816			3,954
Reverse mortgage securities(3)		5,490			6,146
Other(4)		859			929


Total other		17,383			20,937
Total retained mortgage portfolio		$	91,320		$	109,221

Retained mortgage portfolio by segment:
Single-family mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities		$	85,739		$	101,518
Multifamily mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities		$	5,581		$	7,703

(1)Consists of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae mortgage-related securities, including Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae. Excludes Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae reverse mortgage securities and Fannie Mae-wrapped private-label securities.

(2)Includes single-family loans on nonaccrual status of $8.5 billion and $11.0 billion, and multifamily loans on nonaccrual status of $233 million and $340 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

(3)Consists of Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae reverse mortgage securities.

(4)Consists of private-label and other securities, Fannie Mae-wrapped private-label securities and mortgage revenue bonds.

The amount of mortgage assets that we may own is capped at $250 billion and will decrease to $225 billion on December 31, 2022 under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury. In addition, we are currently required to cap our mortgage assets at $225 billion per instruction from FHFA. See “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information on our portfolio cap.

We include 10% of the notional value of interest-only securities in calculating the size of the retained portfolio for the purpose of determining compliance with the senior preferred stock purchase agreement retained portfolio limits and associated FHFA guidance. As of June 30, 2022, 10% of the notional value of our interest-only securities was $1.8 billion, which is not included in the table above.

Under the terms of our MBS trust documents, we have the option or, in some instances, the obligation, to purchase mortgage loans that meet specific criteria from an MBS trust. The purchase price for these loans is the unpaid principal balance of the loan plus accrued interest. If a delinquent loan remains in a single-family MBS trust, the servicer is responsible for advancing the borrower’s missed scheduled principal and interest payments to the MBS holders for up to four months, after which time we must make these missed payments. In addition, we must reimburse servicers for advanced principal and interest payments. The cost of purchasing most delinquent loans from a single-family Fannie Mae MBS trust and holding them in our retained mortgage portfolio is currently less than the cost of advancing delinquent payments to security holders.

In support of our loss mitigation strategies, we purchased $11.2 billion of loans from our single-family MBS trusts in the first half of 2022, the substantial majority of which were delinquent, compared with $3.7 billion of loans purchased from single-family MBS trusts in the first half of 2021. We purchased more loans out of trust in the first half of 2022 than in


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						23


			MD&A \| Retained Mortgage Portfolio

the first half of 2021 because the forbearance periods for many loans that entered into a COVID-19-related forbearance began expiring in late 2021. The size of our retained mortgage portfolio will be impacted by the volume of loans we ultimately buy, the timing of those purchases, and the length of time those loans remain in our retained mortgage portfolio. See “Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Problem Loan Management—Single-Family Loans in Forbearance” and “Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Foreclosure Prevention—Multifamily Loan Forbearance” for information on our loans in forbearance.

Guaranty Book of Business

Our “guaranty book of business” consists of:

•Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, excluding the portions of any structured securities we issue that are backed by Freddie Mac securities;

•mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio; and

•other credit enhancements that we provide on mortgage assets.

“Total Fannie Mae guarantees” consists of:

•our guaranty book of business; and

•the portions of any structured securities we issue that are backed by Freddie Mac securities.

We and Freddie Mac issue single-family uniform mortgage-backed securities, or “UMBS.” In this report, we use the term “Fannie Mae-issued UMBS” to refer to single-family Fannie Mae MBS that are directly backed by fixed-rate mortgage loans and generally eligible for trading in the to-be-announced (“TBA”) market. We use the term “Fannie Mae MBS” or “our MBS” to refer to any type of mortgage-backed security that we issue, including UMBS, Supers®, Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit securities (“REMICs”) and other types of single-family or multifamily mortgage-backed securities.

Some Fannie Mae MBS that we issue are backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities. When we resecuritize Freddie Mac securities into Fannie Mae-issued structured securities, such as Supers and REMICs, our guaranty of principal and interest extends to the underlying Freddie Mac securities. However, Freddie Mac continues to guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have resecuritized. Although our guaranty of the underlying Freddie Mac securities requires us to hold additional capital under the enterprise regulatory capital framework, prior to July 1, 2022, we did not charge an incremental fee to create structured securities that include Freddie Mac securities. Effective July 1, 2022, we began charging an upfront fee of 50 basis points to include Freddie Mac securities in our structured securities. For more information regarding this upfront fee, see “Legislation and Regulation—Upfront Fee for Commingled Securities and Review of the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework.” References to our single-family guaranty book of business exclude Freddie Mac-acquired mortgage loans underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have resecuritized.

Our issuance of structured securities backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities creates additional off-balance sheet exposure. Our guaranty extends to the underlying Freddie Mac security included in the structured security, but we do not have control over the Freddie Mac mortgage loan securitizations. Because we do not have the power to direct matters (primarily the servicing of mortgage loans) that impact the credit risk to which we are exposed, which constitute control of these securitization trusts, we do not consolidate these trusts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, giving rise to off-balance sheet exposure. See “Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and “Note 6, Financial Guarantees” for information regarding our maximum exposure to loss on unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and Freddie Mac securities.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						24


			MD&A \| Guaranty Book of Business

The table below displays the composition of our guaranty book of business based on unpaid principal balance. Our single-family guaranty book of business accounted for 89% of our total guaranty book of business as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.


Composition of Fannie Mae Guaranty Book of Business
	As of
	June 30, 2022						December 31, 2021
	Single-Family		Multifamily		Total		Single-Family		Multifamily		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Conventional guaranty book of business(1)	$	3,639,402	$	429,005	$	4,068,407	$	3,536,613	$	419,463	$	3,956,076
Government guaranty book of business(2)	13,550		660		14,210		16,777		718		17,495
Guaranty book of business	3,652,952		429,665		4,082,617		3,553,390		420,181		3,973,571
Freddie Mac securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae(3)	247,559		—		247,559		212,259		—		212,259
Total Fannie Mae guarantees	$	3,900,511	$	429,665	$	4,330,176	$	3,765,649	$	420,181	$	4,185,830

(1)Refers to mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities that are not guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.

(2)Refers to mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.

(3)Consists of off-balance sheet arrangements of approximately (i) $205.2 billion and $177.8 billion in unpaid principal balance of Freddie Mac-issued UMBS backing Fannie Mae-issued Supers as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively; and (ii) $42.4 billion and $34.5 billion in unpaid principal balance of Freddie Mac securities backing Fannie Mae-issued REMICs as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

The Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended, including by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (together, the “GSE Act”) requires us to set aside each year an amount equal to 4.2 basis points of the unpaid principal balance of our new business purchases and to pay this amount to specified HUD and Treasury funds in support of affordable housing. In March 2022, we paid $598 million to the funds based on our new business purchases in 2021. For the first half of 2022, we recognized an expense of $188 million related to this obligation based on $446.7 billion in new business purchases during the period. We expect to pay this amount to the funds in 2023, plus additional amounts to be accrued based on our new business purchases in the second half of 2022. See “Business—Legislation and Regulation—GSE-Focused Matters—Affordable Housing Allocations” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information regarding this obligation.

Business Segments

We have two reportable business segments: Single-Family and Multifamily. The Single-Family business operates in the secondary mortgage market relating to single-family mortgage loans, which are secured by properties containing four or fewer residential dwelling units. The Multifamily business operates in the secondary mortgage market relating primarily to multifamily mortgage loans, which are secured by properties containing five or more residential units.

The chart below displays net revenues and net income for each of our business segments for the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021. Net revenues consist of net interest income and fee and other income.

Business Segment Net Revenues and Net Income

(Dollars in billions)


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						25


			MD&A \| Business Segments

In the following sections, we describe each segment’s business metrics, financial results and credit performance. For an overview of how we are compensated for and manage the risk of credit losses through the life cycle of our loans and how we measure our credit risk, see “Business—Managing Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Single-Family Business

This section supplements and updates information regarding our Single-Family business segment in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “MD&A—Single-Family Business” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the primary business activities, lenders, investors and competition of our Single-Family business.

Single-Family Mortgage Market

Housing activity decreased in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the first quarter of 2022. Total existing home sales averaged 5.4 million units annualized in the second quarter of 2022, compared with 6.1 million units in the first quarter of 2022, according to data from the National Association of REALTORS®. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, new single-family home sales averaged an annualized rate of approximately 612,000 units in the second quarter of 2022, compared with approximately 776,000 units in the first quarter of 2022.

The 30-year fixed mortgage rate averaged 5.52% in June 2022, compared with 4.17% in March 2022, according to Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey®.

According to the July forecast from our Economic and Strategic Research Group, we forecast that total originations in the U.S. single-family mortgage market in 2022 will decrease from 2021 levels by approximately 43%, from an estimated $4.47 trillion in 2021 to $2.53 trillion in 2022, and the amount of refinance originations in the U.S. single-family mortgage market will decrease from an estimated $2.61 trillion in 2021 to $756 billion in 2022. We estimate that approximately two-thirds of the single-family refinance originations we forecast for 2022 occurred during the first half of 2022. Our July forecast is based on data available as of July 11, 2022. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional discussion of how housing activity can affect our financial results and the uncertainties that may affect our forecasts and expectations.

Single-Family Market Activity

Single-Family Mortgage-Related Securities Issuances Share

Our single-family Fannie Mae MBS issuances were $174.5 billion for the second quarter of 2022, compared with $388.5 billion for the second quarter of 2021. This decrease was driven by a lower volume of refinance activity in the second quarter of 2022 due to higher mortgage rates. Based on the latest data available, the chart below displays our estimated share of single-family mortgage-related securities issuances in the second quarter of 2022 as compared with that of our primary competitors for the issuance of single-family mortgage-related securities.

Single-Family Mortgage-Related Securities Issuances Share

Second Quarter 2022

We estimate our share of single-family mortgage-related securities issuances was 37% in the first quarter of 2022 and 40% in the second quarter of 2021.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						26


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Business Metrics

Presentation of Our Single-Family Guaranty Book of Business

For purposes of the information reported in this “Single-Family Business” section, we measure the single-family guaranty book of business using the unpaid principal balance of our mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS outstanding. By contrast, the single-family guaranty book of business presented in the “Composition of Fannie Mae Guaranty Book of Business” table in the “Guaranty Book of Business” section is based on the unpaid principal balance of the Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, rather than the unpaid principal balance of the underlying mortgage loans. These amounts differ primarily as a result of payments we receive on underlying loans that have not yet been remitted to the MBS holders or instances where we have advanced missed borrower payments on mortgage loans to make required distributions to related MBS holders. As measured for purposes of the information reported below, our single-family conventional guaranty book of business was $3,613.9 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $3,483.1 billion as of December 31, 2021.

Single-Family Business Metrics

Net interest income for our Single-Family business is driven by the guaranty fees we charge and the size of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business. The guaranty fees we charge are based on the characteristics of the loans we acquire. We may adjust our guaranty fees in light of market conditions and to achieve return targets. As a result, the average charged guaranty fee on new acquisitions may fluctuate based on the credit quality and product mix of loans acquired, as well as market conditions and other factors.

The charts below display our average charged guaranty fees, net of TCCA fees, on our single-family conventional guaranty book of business and on new single-family conventional loan acquisitions, along with our average single-family conventional guaranty book of business and our single-family conventional loan acquisitions for the periods presented.

Select Single-Family Business Metrics

(Dollars in billions)

Average charged guaranty fee on single-family conventional guaranty book of business, net of TCCA fees(1)

Average single-family conventional guaranty book of business(2)

Average charged guaranty fee on new single-family conventional acquisitions, net of TCCA fees(1)

Single-family conventional acquisitions

(1) Excludes the impact of a 10 basis point guaranty fee increase implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us.

(2) Our single-family conventional guaranty book of business primarily consists of single-family conventional mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS outstanding. It also includes single-family conventional mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio, and other credit enhancements that we provide on single-family conventional mortgage assets. Our single-family conventional guaranty book of business does not include: (a) mortgage loans guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government; or (b) Freddie Mac-acquired mortgage loans underlying Freddie Mac-issued UMBS that we have resecuritized. Our average single-family conventional guaranty book of business is based on quarter-end balances.

Average charged guaranty fee on newly acquired conventional single-family loans is a metric management uses to measure the price we earn as compensation for the credit risk we manage and to assess our return. Average charged guaranty fee represents, on an annualized basis, the average of the base guaranty fees charged during the period for our single-family conventional guaranty arrangements, which we receive monthly over the life of the loan, plus the recognition of any upfront cash payments, including loan-level price adjustments, based on an estimated average life at the time of acquisition. We use loan-level price adjustments, including various upfront risk-based fees, to price for the


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						27


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Business Metrics

credit risk we assume in providing our guaranty. FHFA must approve changes to the national loan-level price adjustments we charge and can direct us to make other changes to our single-family guaranty fee pricing.

Our average charged guaranty fee on newly acquired conventional single-family loans, net of TCCA fees, increased in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021, due to the overall weaker credit risk profile of our second quarter 2022 acquisitions driven by the increased share of our acquisitions that were purchase loans, versus refinancings, in the second quarter of 2022 compared with the second quarter of 2021. We generally charge higher guaranty fees on loans with weaker credit risk characteristics. See “Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring” below for a description of key risk characteristics of our single-family acquisitions in the second quarter of 2022 and second quarter of 2021.

In January 2022, FHFA announced targeted increases to the upfront fees we charge for certain high-balance loans and second home loans. High-balance loans are mortgages originated in certain designated areas above the baseline conforming loan limit. The new fees became effective for loans purchased on or after April 1, 2022, and for loans delivered into an MBS trust with an issue date on or after April 1, 2022. High-balance loans will continue to be eligible for our existing affordable loan products, HomeReady® and HFA PreferredTM, which offer caps on loan-level price adjustments for eligible borrowers. In addition, the high-balance upfront fees will not be charged on loans to first time homebuyers in high-cost areas with incomes at or below 100% of area median income. The portion of our acquisitions attributed to high-balance and second home loans decreased in second quarter of 2022 compared with the first quarter of 2022.


Single-Family Business Financial Results(1)
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		2022		2021		Variance
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income(2)	$	6,573	$	7,323	$	(750)	$	12,828	$	13,217	$	(389)
Fee and other income	60		80		(20)		121		142		(21)
Net revenues	6,633		7,403		(770)		12,949		13,359		(410)
Investment gains (losses), net	(27)		658		(685)		(93)		722		(815)
Fair value gains (losses), net	543		(386)		929		1,070		354		716
Administrative expenses	(671)		(619)		(52)		(1,354)		(1,242)		(112)
Credit-related income (expense)(3)	(231)		2,525		(2,756)		(467)		3,204		(3,671)
TCCA fees(2)	(841)		(758)		(83)		(1,665)		(1,489)		(176)
Credit enhancement expense	(270)		(219)		(51)		(480)		(445)		(35)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries(4)	(43)		(57)		14		26		(73)		99
Other expenses, net(5)	(199)		(315)		116		(397)		(602)		205
Income before federal income taxes	4,894		8,232		(3,338)		9,589		13,788		(4,199)
Provision for federal income taxes	(1,008)		(1,725)		717		(1,994)		(2,887)		893
Net income	$	3,886	$	6,507	$	(2,621)	$	7,595	$	10,901	$	(3,306)

(1)See “Note 9, Segment Reporting” for information about our segment allocation methodology.

(2)Reflects the impact of a 10 basis point guaranty fee increase implemented pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is remitted to Treasury. The resulting revenue is included in “Net interest income” and the expense is recognized as “TCCA fees.”

(3)Consists of the benefit or provision for credit losses and foreclosed property income or expense.

(4)Consists of increase (decrease) in benefits recognized from our single-family freestanding credit enhancements, which primarily relate to our CAS and CIRT programs.

(5)Consists primarily of debt extinguishment gains and losses, housing trust fund expenses, servicer fees paid in connection with certain loss mitigation activities, and loan subservicing costs.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						28


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Business Financial Results

Net Interest Income

The decrease in single-family net interest income for the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily driven by lower net amortization income due to lower prepayment volumes, partially offset by higher base guaranty fee income and higher income from portfolios.

See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income” for more information on the factors that contributed to our single-family net interest income.

Investment Gains (Losses), Net

The drivers of investment gains (losses), net for the Single-Family segment are consistent with the drivers of investment gains (losses), net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, which we discuss in “Consolidated Results of Operations—Investment Gains (Losses), Net.”

Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net

Fair value gains, net in the second quarter and first half of 2022 were driven by gains as a result of increases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives and gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, which were partially offset by losses on trading securities.

Fair value losses, net in the second quarter of 2021 were primarily driven by decreases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives, partially offset by gains on trading securities.

Fair value gains, net in the first half of 2021 were driven by gains as a result of increases in the fair value of mortgage commitment derivatives and gains on the fair value of long-term debt of consolidated trusts held at fair value, which were partially offset by losses on trading securities.

The drivers of fair value gains, net for the Single-Family segment are consistent with the drivers of fair value gains, net in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, which we discuss in “Consolidated Results of Operations—Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net.”

For information on the implementation of our hedge accounting program and its impact on our financial statements, see “Consolidated Results of Operations—Hedge Accounting Impact” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Consolidated Results of Operations—Fair Value Gains (Losses), Net” in this report.

Credit-Related Income (Expense)

The largest driver of credit-related expense for the second quarter and first half of 2022 was a provision for higher actual and projected interest rates due to interest rate increases in the first half of 2022. Some of the provision from increased actual and projected interest rates in the second quarter and first half of 2022 was offset by a benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth.

Credit-related income for the second quarter of 2021 was driven by a benefit for credit losses due primarily to strong actual and forecasted home price growth, the redesignation of certain reperforming loans from HFI to HFS, lower actual and projected interest rates, and a reduction in our allowance for loan losses for changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies.

Credit-related income for the first half of 2021 was driven by a benefit for credit losses due primarily to strong actual and forecasted home price growth, the redesignation of certain reperforming loans from HFI to HFS and a reduction in our allowance for loan losses for changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies. The impact of those factors was partially offset by higher actual and projected interest rates.

See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” for more information on the primary factors that contributed to our single-family credit-related income or expense. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” for additional information on our adoption of ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 2022 and the prospective discontinuation of TDR accounting.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						29


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

This section updates our discussion of single-family mortgage credit risk management in our 2021 Form 10-K. For an overview of key elements of our mortgage credit risk management, see “Business—Managing Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K. For additional information on our acquisition and servicing policies, underwriting and servicing standards, quality control process, repurchase requests, and representation and warranty framework, see “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						30


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Single-Family Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring

The following table displays our single-family conventional business volumes and our single-family conventional guaranty book of business, based on certain key risk characteristics that we use to evaluate the risk profile and credit quality of our single-family loans.

We provide additional information on the credit characteristics of our single-family loans in quarterly financial supplements, which we furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website. Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.


Key Risk Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume and Guaranty Book of Business(1)
	Percent of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume at Acquisition(2)												Percent of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business(3) As of
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022			2021			2022			2021			June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021
Original loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio:(4)
<= 60%	21		%	31		%	25		%	33		%	27		%	27		%
60.01% to 70%	12			16			14			16			15			15
70.01% to 80%	33			31			33			31			33			33
80.01% to 90%	12			10			10			9			10			10
90.01% to 95%	17			10			13			9			10			10
95.01% to 100%	5			2			5			2			4			4
Greater than 100%	—			*			*			*			1			1
Total	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%
Weighted average	75		%	70		%	73		%	69		%	72		%	72		%
Average loan amount	$	300,556		$	281,749		$	299,852		$	282,169		$	204,264		$	198,865
Loan count (in thousands)	573			1,325			1,373			2,742			17,692			17,515
Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:(5)
<= 60%													70		%	61		%
60.01% to 70%													16			19
70.01% to 80%													9			13
80.01% to 90%													4			5
90.01% to 100%													1			2
Greater than 100%													*			*
Total													100		%	100		%
Weighted average													50		%	54		%
FICO credit score at origination:
< 620	*		%	—		%	*		%	—		%	1		%	1		%
620 to < 660	4			3			4			2			4			4
660 to < 680	5			3			5			3			4			3
680 to < 700	8			6			8			5			6			7
700 to < 740	22			18			21			18			19			19
>= 740	61			70			62			72			66			66
Total	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%
Weighted average	746			757			747			759			753			753
Debt-to-income (“DTI”) ratio at origination:(6)
<= 43%	68		%	78		%	70		%	79		%	77		%	77		%
43.01% to 45%	10			8			10			8			8			9
Greater than 45%	22			14			20			13			15			14
Total	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%	100		%
Weighted average	37		%	34		%	36		%	34		%	35		%	34		%


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						31


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management


	Percent of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume at Acquisition(2)								Percent of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business(3) As of
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021		June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Product type:
Fixed-rate:(7)
Long-term	91	%	82	%	88	%	83	%	85	%	84	%
Intermediate-term	8		17		11		17		14		15
Total fixed-rate	99		99		99		100		99		99
Adjustable-rate	1		1		1		*		1		1
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Number of property units:
1 unit	98	%	98	%	98	%	98	%	97	%	97	%
2-4 units	2		2		2		2		3		3
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Property type:
Single-family homes	91	%	91	%	91	%	91	%	91	%	91	%
Condo/Co-op	9		9		9		9		9		9
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Occupancy type:
Primary residence	91	%	93	%	91	%	92	%	90	%	90	%
Second/vacation home	2		3		3		3		4		4
Investor	7		4		6		5		6		6
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Loan purpose:
Purchase	64	%	35	%	52	%	30	%	38	%	36	%
Cash-out refinance	26		22		30		21		22		21
Other refinance	10		43		18		49		40		43
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Geographic concentration:(8)
Midwest	13	%	13	%	12	%	13	%	14	%	14	%
Northeast	12		14		13		14		16		16
Southeast	27		23		26		22		23		23
Southwest	24		19		22		18		19		18
West	24		31		27		33		28		29
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Origination year:
2016 and prior									20	%	23	%
2017									3		4
2018									2		3
2019									5		6
2020									27		30
2021									34		34
2022									9		—
Total									100	%	100	%

* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional business volume or guaranty book of business.

(1)Second-lien mortgage loans held by third parties are not reflected in the original LTV or the estimated mark-to-market LTV ratios in this table.

(2)Calculated based on the unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category at time of acquisition.

(3)Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of single-family loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.

(4)The original LTV ratio generally is based on the original unpaid principal balance of the loan divided by the appraised property value reported to us at the time of acquisition of the loan. Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						32


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

(5)The aggregate estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio is based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan as of the end of each reported period divided by the estimated current value of the property, which we calculate using an internal valuation model that estimates periodic changes in home value. Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.

(6)Excludes loans for which this information is not readily available.

(7)Long-term fixed-rate consists of mortgage loans with maturities greater than 15 years, while intermediate-term fixed-rate loans have maturities equal to or less than 15 years.

(8)Midwest consists of IL, IN, IA, MI, MN, NE, ND, OH, SD and WI. Northeast consists of CT, DE, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, PR, RI, VT and VI. Southeast consists of AL, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA and WV. Southwest consists of AZ, AR, CO, KS, LA, MO, NM, OK, TX and UT. West consists of AK, CA, GU, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA and WY.

Characteristics of our New Single-Family Loan Acquisitions

Refinancing activity began to taper beginning in the second half of 2021 and remains at lower levels, as a large portion of our single-family guaranty book of business had already recently refinanced and interest rates increased. Accordingly, the share of our single-family loan acquisitions consisting of refinance loans (versus home purchase loans) decreased to 36% in the second quarter of 2022 compared with 65% in the second quarter of 2021. Typically, home purchase loans have higher LTV ratios than refinance loans. This trend contributed to an increase in the percentage of our single-family loan acquisitions with LTV ratios over 80%, from 22% in the second quarter of 2021 to 34% in the second quarter of 2022. The decline in refinance share also contributed to a decline in the percentage of loans we acquired with a FICO credit score of 740 or greater, from 70% in the second quarter of 2021 to 61% in the second quarter of 2022, as well as an increase in the percentage of loans we acquired with a FICO credit score less than 680, from 6% in the second quarter of 2021 to 9% in the second quarter of 2022.

Our share of acquisitions of loans with DTI ratios above 45% increased to 22% in the second quarter of 2022 compared with 14% in the second quarter of 2021. This increase was also driven by the higher share of home purchase acquisitions, which tend to have higher DTI ratios than refinance loan acquisitions.

For a discussion of factors that may impact the volume and credit characteristics of loans we acquire in the future, see “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring” in our 2021 Form 10-K. In this section of our 2021 Form 10-K, we also provide more information on the credit characteristics of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business, including high-balance loans, reverse mortgages and mortgage products with rate resets.

Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk

Our charter generally requires credit enhancement on any single-family conventional mortgage loan that we purchase or securitize if it has an LTV ratio over 80% at the time of purchase. We generally achieve this through primary mortgage insurance. We also enter into various other types of transactions in which we transfer mortgage credit risk to third parties.

Our approved monoline mortgage insurers’ financial ability and willingness to pay claims is an important determinant of our overall credit risk exposure. For a discussion of our exposure to and management of the institutional counterparty credit risk associated with the providers of these credit enhancements, see “MD&A—Risk Management—Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management” and “Note 13, Concentrations of Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Risk Management—Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management” and “Note 10, Concentrations of Credit Risk” in this report. Also see “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						33


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

The table below displays information about loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business covered by one or more forms of credit enhancement, including mortgage insurance or a credit risk transfer transaction. For a description of primary mortgage insurance and the other types of credit enhancements specified in the table, see “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K.


Single-Family Loans with Credit Enhancement
	As of
		June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
		Unpaid Principal Balance		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business		Unpaid Principal Balance		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business
	(Dollars in billions)
Primary mortgage insurance and other		$	734	20	%	$	697	20	%
Connecticut Avenue Securities		681		19		512		14
Credit Insurance Risk Transfer		276		7		168		5
Lender risk-sharing		61		2		70		2
Less: Loans covered by multiple credit enhancements		(328)		(9)		(253)		(7)
Total single-family loans with credit enhancement		$	1,424	39	%	$	1,194	34	%

Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk

In addition to primary mortgage insurance, our Single-Family business has developed other risk-sharing capabilities to transfer portions of our single-family mortgage credit risk to the private market. Our credit risk transfer transactions have been designed to transfer a portion of the losses we expect would be incurred in an economic downturn or a stressed credit environment. Generally, benefits are received after the underlying property has been liquidated and all applicable proceeds, including private mortgage insurance benefits, have been applied to reduce the loss. As described in “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk—Credit Risk Transfer Transactions” in our 2021 Form 10-K, we have used primarily three single-family credit risk transfer programs: Connecticut Avenue Securities® (“CAS”), Credit Insurance Risk TransferTM (“CIRTTM”), and lender risk-sharing.

In the first half of 2022, we transferred a portion of the mortgage credit risk on single-family mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of $381.8 billion at the time of the transactions; substantially all of the loans in these credit risk transfer transactions were acquired in 2021.

The factors we expect will affect the extent to which we engage in single-family credit risk transfer transactions in the future and the structure of those transactions include our risk appetite, future market conditions, the cost of the transactions, FHFA guidance or requirements (including FHFA’s scorecard), the capital relief provided by the transactions, and our overall business and capital plans.

In March 2022, FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework. Among other changes, the amendment refined the risk-based capital treatment of credit risk transfer transactions. These changes to the enterprise regulatory capital framework increase the capital relief afforded by credit risk transfer transactions.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						34


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

The table below displays the aggregate mortgage credit risk transferred to third parties and retained by Fannie Mae pursuant to our single-family credit risk transfer transactions. The table does not include the credit risk transferred on single-family transactions that were cancelled or terminated as of June 30, 2022. The table below also excludes coverage obtained through primary mortgage insurance. The risk in force of these transactions, which refers to the maximum amount of losses that could be absorbed by credit risk transfer investors, was approximately $42 billion as of June 30, 2022, compared with approximately $36 billion as of June 30, 2021. Because of the large number of mortgage prepayments in recent periods, the first loss retention layer on each credit risk transfer transaction has increased as a percentage of the outstanding reference pool. As a result, to the extent that these deals were impacted by refinancing activity, the losses on the remaining covered reference pools must generally reach a higher percentage of the remaining outstanding balance before those credit risk transfer transactions will pay any benefits to us. In addition, home price appreciation since we entered into the transactions reduces the likelihood that we will incur losses on the covered loans large enough to receive a benefit from these transactions.

Outstanding as of June 30, 2022

(Dollars in billions)

Senior

Fannie Mae(1)

$978

Outstanding Reference Pool(4)(6)

$1,033

Mezzanine

Fannie Mae(1)

CIRT(2)(3)

$13

CAS(2)

$13

Lender Risk-Sharing(2)

First Loss

Fannie Mae(1)

$10

CAS(2)(5)

$10

Lender Risk-Sharing(2)

(1)Credit risk retained by Fannie Mae in CAS, CIRT and lender risk-sharing transactions. Tranche sizes vary across programs.

(2)Credit risk transferred to third parties. Tranche sizes vary across programs.

(3)Includes mortgage pool insurance transactions covering loans with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $1.4 billion outstanding as of June 30, 2022.

(4)For CIRT and some lender risk-sharing transactions, “Reference Pool” reflects a pool of covered loans.

(5)For CAS transactions, “First Loss” represents all B tranche balances.

(6)For CAS and some lender risk-sharing transactions, represents outstanding reference pools, not the outstanding unpaid principal balance of the underlying loans. The outstanding unpaid principal balance for all loans covered by credit risk transfer programs, including all loans on which risk has been transferred in lender risk-sharing transactions, was approximately $1,018 billion as of June 30, 2022.

The following table displays information about the credit enhancement recovery receivables we have recognized within “Other assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.


Single-Family Credit Enhancement Receivables
	As Of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Freestanding credit enhancement receivables	$	123	$	99
Primary mortgage insurance receivables, net of allowance(1)	53		54

(1)Amount is net of a valuation allowance of $463 million and $479 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The vast majority of this valuation allowance related to deferred payment obligations associated with unpaid claim amounts for which collectability is uncertain.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						35


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

The following table displays the approximate cash paid or transferred to investors for credit risk transfer transactions outstanding. The cash represents the portion of the guaranty fee paid to investors as compensation for taking on a share of the credit risk.


Credit Risk Transfer Transactions
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021
Cash paid or transferred for:	(Dollars in millions)
CAS transactions(1)	$	419	$	415
CIRT transactions	143		158
Lender risk-sharing transactions	82		140

(1)Consists of cash paid for interest expense net of LIBOR or SOFR, as applicable, on outstanding CAS debt and amounts paid for both CAS REMIC® and CAS Credit-linked notes (“CLN”) transactions.

Cash paid or transferred to investors for CIRT transactions includes cancellation fees paid on certain CIRT transactions where we determined that the cost of these deals exceeded the expected remaining benefit. The table excludes cash paid upon the repurchase of legacy CAS debt. In July 2022, we paid $2.4 billion to repurchase a portion of our outstanding CAS debt.

The table below displays the primary characteristics of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business without credit enhancement as of the specified dates.


Single-Family Loans without Credit Enhancement
	As of
	June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business		Unpaid Principal Balance		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business
	(Dollars in billions)
Low LTV ratio or short-term(1)	$	1,199	33	%	$	1,167	34	%
Pre-credit risk transfer program inception(2)	289		8		324		9
Recently acquired(3)	682		19		983		28
Other(4)	583		16		565		16
Less: Loans in multiple categories	(563)		(15)		(750)		(21)
Total single-family loans without credit enhancement	$	2,190	61	%	$	2,289	66	%

(1)Represents loans with an LTV ratio less than or equal to 60% or loans with an original maturity of 20 years or less.

(2)Represents loans that were acquired before the inception of our credit risk transfer programs. Also includes Refi PlusTM loans.

(3)Represents loans that were recently acquired and have not been included in a reference pool.

(4)Includes adjustable-rate mortgage loans, loans with a combined LTV ratio greater than 97%, non-Refi Plus loans acquired after the inception of our credit risk transfer programs that became 30 or more days delinquent prior to inclusion in a credit risk transfer transaction and loans that were delinquent as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

Single-Family Problem Loan Management

Our problem loan management strategies focus primarily on reducing defaults to avoid losses that would otherwise occur and pursuing foreclosure alternatives to mitigate the severity of the losses we incur. See “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Problem Loan Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of delinquency statistics on our problem loans, efforts undertaken to manage our problem loans, metrics regarding our loan workout activities, real estate owned (“REO”) management and other single-family credit-related information. The discussion below updates some of that information. We also provide ongoing credit performance information on loans underlying single-family Fannie Mae MBS and loans covered by single-family credit risk transfer transactions. For loans backing Fannie Mae MBS, see the “Forbearance and Delinquency Dashboard” available in the MBS section of our Data Dynamics® tool, which is available at www.fanniemae.com/datadynamics. For loans covered by credit risk transfer transactions, see the “Deal Performance Data” report available in the CAS and CIRT sections of the tool. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report. Information in Data Dynamics


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						36


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

may differ from similar measures presented in our financial statements and other public disclosures for a variety of reasons, including as a result of variations in the loan population covered, timing differences in reporting and other factors.

Single-Family Serious Delinquency Rates

The tables below display the delinquency status of loans and changes in the volume of seriously delinquent loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on the number of loans. Single-family seriously delinquent loans are loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process, expressed as a percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on loan count. Management monitors the single-family serious delinquency rate as an indicator of potential future credit losses and loss mitigation activities. Serious delinquency rates are reflective of our performance in assessing and managing credit risk associated with single-family loans in our guaranty book of business. Typically, higher serious delinquency rates result in a higher allowance for loan losses.

For purposes of our disclosures regarding delinquency status, we report loans receiving COVID-19-related payment forbearance as delinquent according to the contractual terms of the loan. Pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), for purposes of reporting to the credit bureaus, servicers must report a borrower receiving a COVID-19-related payment accommodation during the covered period, such as a forbearance plan or loan modification, as current if the borrower was current prior to receiving the accommodation and the borrower makes all required payments in accordance with the accommodation.


Delinquency Status and Activity of Single-Family Conventional Loans
	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021		June 30, 2021
Delinquency status:
30 to 59 days delinquent	0.84	%	0.86	%	0.74	%
60 to 89 days delinquent	0.19		0.20		0.20
Seriously delinquent (“SDQ”):	0.81		1.25		2.08
Percentage of SDQ loans that have been delinquent for more than 180 days	68		75		79
Percentage of SDQ loans that have been delinquent for more than two years	19		9		6


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022	2021
Single-family SDQ loans (number of loans):
Beginning balance	218,329	495,806
Additions	84,409	139,375
Removals:
Modifications and other loan workouts	(104,559)	(174,618)
Liquidations and sales	(22,083)	(37,811)
Cured or less than 90 days delinquent	(33,462)	(58,812)
Total removals	(160,104)	(271,241)
Ending balance	142,634	363,940

Our single-family serious delinquency rate decreased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021 and June 30, 2021 as a result of single-family borrowers exiting forbearance through a loan workout or by otherwise reinstating their loan. As of June 30, 2022, single-family loans in forbearance comprised 27% of our single-family seriously delinquent loans.

The table below displays the serious delinquency rates for, and the percentage of our seriously delinquent single-family conventional loans represented by, the specified loan categories. Percentage of book amounts represent the unpaid principal balance of loans for each category divided by the unpaid principal balance of our total single-family conventional guaranty book of business. The reported categories are not mutually exclusive.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						37


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management


Single-Family Conventional Seriously Delinquent Loan Concentration Analysis
	As of
	June 30, 2022							December 31, 2021							June 30, 2021
		Percentage of Book Outstanding		Percentage of Seriously Delinquent Loans(1)		Serious Delinquency Rate			Percentage of Book Outstanding		Percentage of Seriously Delinquent Loans(1)		Serious Delinquency Rate			Percentage of Book Outstanding		Percentage of Seriously Delinquent Loans(1)		Serious Delinquency Rate
States:
California		19	%	10	%	0.59	%		19	%	11	%	1.01	%		20	%	12	%	1.84	%
Florida		6		8		0.92			6		8		1.59			6		9		2.81
Illinois		3		5		1.08			3		5		1.55			3		5		2.51
New Jersey		3		4		1.17			3		5		1.90			3		5		3.33
New York		5		8		1.54			5		7		2.24			5		7		3.71
All other states		64		65		0.76			64		64		1.16			63		62		1.88
Vintages:
2004 and prior		1		11		2.75			1		10		3.48			1		10		5.04
2005-2008		1		15		4.45			2		14		5.87			2		15		8.75
2009-2022		98		74		0.63			97		76		1.01			97		75		1.69
Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:
<= 60%		70		80		0.82			61		73		1.27			57		66		2.02
60.01% to 70%		16		12		0.83			19		16		1.37			19		17		2.41
70.01% to 80%		9		5		0.67			13		8		1.08			15		11		2.16
80.01% to 90%		4		2		0.52			5		2		0.88			7		4		1.70
90.01% to 100%		1		1		0.46			2		1		0.51			2		1		1.21
Greater than 100%		*		*		9.40			*		*		12.41			*		1		20.48
Credit enhanced:(2)
Primary MI & other(3)		20		29		1.40			20		29		2.14			20		27		3.31
Credit risk transfer(4)		28		27		0.84			21		32		1.80			21		34		3.21
Non-credit enhanced		61		55		0.69			66		53		0.98			65		52		1.63

*Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional guaranty book of business.

(1)Calculated based on the number of single-family loans that were seriously delinquent for each category divided by the total number of single-family conventional loans that were seriously delinquent.

(2)The credit-enhanced categories are not mutually exclusive. A loan with primary mortgage insurance that is also covered by a credit risk transfer transaction will be included in both the “Primary MI & other” category and the “Credit risk transfer” category. As a result, the “Credit enhanced” and “Non-credit enhanced” categories do not sum to 100%. The total percentage of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business with some form of credit enhancement as of June 30, 2022 was 39%.

(3)Refers to loans included in an agreement used to reduce credit risk by requiring primary mortgage insurance, collateral, letters of credit, corporate guarantees, or other agreements to provide an entity with some assurance that it will be compensated to some degree in the event of a financial loss. Excludes loans covered by credit risk transfer transactions unless such loans are also covered by primary mortgage insurance.

(4)Refers to loans included in reference pools for credit risk transfer transactions, including loans in these transactions that are also covered by primary mortgage insurance. For CAS and some lender risk-sharing transactions, this represents the outstanding unpaid principal balance of the underlying loans on the single-family mortgage credit book, not the outstanding reference pool, as of the specified date. Loans included in our credit risk transfer transactions have all been acquired since 2009.

Single-Family Loans in Forbearance

As a part of our relief programs, we have authorized our servicers to permit payment forbearance to borrowers experiencing a COVID-19-related financial hardship for up to 12 months without regard to the delinquency status of the loan, and for borrowers already in forbearance as of February 28, 2021, for a total of up to 18 months, provided that the forbearance does not result in the loan becoming greater than 18 months delinquent. We believe that the substantial majority of borrowers who will ultimately request COVID-19-related relief have already done so.

As of June 30, 2022, the unpaid principal balance of single-family loans in forbearance was $12.3 billion compared with $23.6 billion as of December 31, 2021. The percentage of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business in forbearance has declined to 0.3% as of June 30, 2022 compared with 0.7% as of December 31, 2021. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, 66% of the single-family loans in forbearance were seriously delinquent. We expect many of the loans in forbearance will resolve their delinquency through a payment deferral, loan modification, or other form of loan workout.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						38


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

The table below displays the status as of June 30, 2022 of the single-family loans in our guaranty book of business that received a forbearance in 2020, 2021 or 2022. The vast majority of these forbearance arrangements were offered to borrowers who experienced a COVID-19-related financial hardship. Many of these borrowers have successfully resolved their forbearance arrangement, primarily through payment deferral, reinstatement or modification. In addition, many of the loans that received a forbearance arrangement have subsequently liquidated, primarily as a result of refinancing. By contrast, we expect that a higher percentage of loans that have yet to resolve their forbearance will receive a modification.

As of June 30, 2022, 91% of single-family loans that received a forbearance and subsequently received a payment deferral were current, and 88% of single-family loans that received a forbearance and subsequently received a completed modification were current. See “Loan Workout Metrics” for additional information about actions we have taken to help reinstate loans to current status.


Status of Single-Family Forbearance Loans
	As of June 30, 2022
	Number of Loans	Percentage of Loans with Forbearance by Category

Loans that received a forbearance, by status:(1)
Active forbearance	57,793	4	%
Payment deferral	387,215	27
Modification(2)	87,993	6
Reinstated(3)	274,443	19
Delinquent at time of exit or repayment plan(4)	43,018	3
Total loans that received a forbearance in our single-family guaranty book of business	850,462	59
Loans that have received a forbearance, but paid off	596,508	41
Total loans that have received a forbearance(5)	1,446,970	100	%

(1)Loans are classified based on their status as of period end; therefore, loans may move from one category to another.

(2)Includes 16,225 loans that are in trial modifications.

(3)Represents loans that are no longer in forbearance but are current according to the original terms of the loan. Also includes loans that remained current throughout the forbearance arrangement and continue to perform.

(4)Consists of 42,275 loans that were delinquent upon the expiration of the forbearance arrangement and 743 delinquent loans that exited forbearance through a repayment plan.

(5)Includes 5,415 loans that were in forbearance as of January 1, 2020.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						39


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

The table below displays the status as of December 31, 2021 for single-family loans in our guaranty book of business that received a forbearance in 2020 or 2021. As of December 31, 2021, 93% of loans that received a forbearance and subsequently received a payment deferral were current, and 86% of loans that received a forbearance and subsequently received a completed modification were current.


Status of Single-Family Forbearance Loans
	As of December 31, 2021
		Number of Loans	Percentage of Loans with Forbearance by Category

Loans that received a forbearance, by status:(1)
Active forbearance		117,440	8	%
Payment deferral		380,070	27
Modification(2)		65,383	5
Reinstated(3)		291,039	21
Delinquent at time of exit or repayment plan(4)		63,069	4
Total loans that received a forbearance in our single-family guaranty book of business		917,001	65
Loans that have received a forbearance, but paid off		497,288	35
Total loans that have received a forbearance(5)		1,414,289	100	%

(1)Loans are classified based on their status as of period end; therefore, loans may move from one category to another.

(2)Includes 33,444 loans that are in trial modifications.

(4)Consists of 60,638 loans that were delinquent upon the expiration of the forbearance arrangement and 2,431 delinquent loans that exited forbearance through a repayment plan.

(5)Includes 5,415 loans that were in forbearance as of January 1, 2020.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						40


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Loan Workout Metrics

As a part of our credit risk management efforts, loan workouts represent actions we take to help reinstate loans to current status and help homeowners stay in their home or to otherwise avoid foreclosure. Our loan workouts reflect various types of home retention solutions, including repayment plans, payment deferrals, and loan modifications. Our loan workouts also include foreclosure alternatives, such as short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure.

The chart below displays the unpaid principal balance of our completed single-family loan workouts by type, as well as the number of loan workouts, for the first half of 2021 compared with the first half of 2022. This table does not include loans in an active forbearance arrangement, trial modifications, loans to certain borrowers who have received bankruptcy relief and repayment plans that have been initiated but not completed.

(1)There were approximately 25,000 loans and 17,300 loans in a trial modification period that was not yet complete as of June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(2)Other was $212 million and $577 million for the first half of 2022 and the first half of 2021, respectively. Other includes repayment plans and foreclosure alternatives. Repayment plans reflect only those plans associated with loans that were 60 days or more delinquent.

The overall decline in loan workout activity was driven by fewer outstanding COVID-19-related forbearances in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021. While payment deferral has been the primary loan workout solution for borrowers exiting forbearance to date, modifications have become an increasing proportion of our home retention solutions in 2022.

As we indicated in “Single-Family Loans in Forbearance,” we believe that the substantial majority of borrowers who will ultimately request COVID-19-related relief have already done so. The total amount of principal and interest deferred to the end of the loan term for single-family loans that received a payment deferral in the first half of 2022 was $706 million, of which $430 million was deferred interest. For the first half of 2021, the total amount of principal and interest deferred was $1.8 billion, of which $1.1 billion was deferred interest.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						41


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Single-Family REO Management

If a loan defaults, we may acquire the property through foreclosure or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The table below displays our REO activity by region. Regional REO acquisition trends generally follow a pattern that is similar to, but lags, that of regional delinquency trends.


Single-Family REO Properties
	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022			2021
Single-family REO properties (number of properties):
Beginning of period inventory of single-family REO properties(1)	7,166			7,973
Acquisitions by geographic area:(2)
Midwest	760			481
Northeast	550			509
Southeast	509			514
Southwest	351			229
West	112			94
Total REO acquisitions(1)	2,282			1,827
Dispositions of REO	(1,811)			(3,437)
End of period inventory of single-family REO properties(1)	7,637			6,363
Carrying value of single-family REO properties (dollars in millions)	$	1,137		$	916
Single-family foreclosure rate(3)	0.03		%	0.02		%
REO net sales price to unpaid principal balance(4)	117		%	109		%
Short sales net sales price to unpaid principal balance(5)	91		%	83		%

(1)Includes held-for-use properties, which are reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of “Other assets.”

(2)See footnote 8 to the “Key Risk Characteristics of Single-Family Conventional Business Volume and Guaranty Book of Business” table for states included in each geographic region.

(3)Estimated based on the annualized total number of properties acquired through foreclosure or deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure as a percentage of the total number of loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business as of the end of each period.

(4)Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on disposition of REO properties during the respective periods, excluding those subject to repurchase requests made to our sellers or servicers, divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans at the time of foreclosure. Net sales price represents the contract sales price less selling costs for the property and other charges paid by the seller at closing.

(5)Calculated as the amount of sale proceeds received on properties sold in short sale transactions during the respective periods divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the related loans. Net sales price includes borrower relocation incentive payments and subordinate lien(s) negotiated payoffs.

In response to the pandemic and with instruction from FHFA, we prohibited our servicers from completing foreclosures on our single-family loans through July 31, 2021, except in the case of vacant or abandoned properties. In addition, our servicers were required to comply with a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) rule that prohibited certain new single-family foreclosures on mortgage loans secured by the borrower’s principal residence until after December 31, 2021. As a result, our foreclosure volumes were slightly higher in the first half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2021.

In April 2022, FHFA announced a suspension of foreclosure activities for up to 60 days for borrowers who apply for assistance under Treasury’s Homeowner Assistance Fund.

Single-Family Credit Loss Metrics and Loan Sale Performance

The single-family credit loss metrics and loan sale performance measures below present information about losses or gains we realized on our single-family loans during the periods presented. The amount of these losses or gains in a given period is driven by foreclosures, pre-foreclosure sales, post-foreclosure REO activity, mortgage loan redesignations, and other events that trigger write-offs and recoveries. The single-family credit loss metrics we present are not defined terms and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Management uses these measures to evaluate the effectiveness of our single-family credit risk management strategies in conjunction with leading indicators such as serious delinquency and forbearance rates, which are potential indicators of future realized single-family credit losses.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						42


			MD&A \| Single-Family Business \| Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management

We believe these measures provide useful information about our single-family credit performance and the factors that impact it.

The table below displays the components of our single-family credit loss metrics and loan sale performance.


Single-Family Credit Loss Metrics and Loan Sale Performance
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Write-offs	$	(40)	$	(4)	$	(56)	$	(23)
Recoveries	88		79		124		84
Foreclosed property income (expense)	(25)		(28)		9		(11)
Credit gains	23		47		77		50
Write-offs on the redesignation of mortgage loans from HFI to HFS(1)	(209)		(146)		(222)		(200)
Net credit gains and write-offs on the redesignations	(186)		(99)		(145)		(150)
Gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments(2)	(24)		604		(91)		635
Net credit gains, write-offs on the redesignations and gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments	$	(210)	$	505	$	(236)	$	485

Credit gain ratio (in bps)(3)	0.3		0.6		0.4		0.3
Net credit gains, write-offs on the redesignations and gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments ratio (in bps)(3)	(2.3)		6.1		(1.3)		3.0

(1)Consists of the lower of cost or fair value adjustment at time of redesignation.

(2)Consists of gains or losses realized on the sales of nonperforming and reperforming mortgage loans during the period and temporary lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments on HFS loans, which are recognized in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

(3)Calculated based on the annualized amount of “Credit gains” and “Net credit gains, write-offs on redesignations and gains (losses) on sales and other valuation adjustments” divided by the average single-family conventional guaranty book of business during the period.

The increase in our single-family write-offs on redesignations in the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily driven by higher lower-of-cost-or-market adjustments in the month of redesignation due to price declines on our HFS loans as interest rates rose.

We had losses on sales and other valuation adjustments in the second quarter and first half of 2022 primarily due to losses on subsequent lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments. Recent market conditions, including higher interest rates in the second quarter and first half of 2022, have reduced the demand for reperforming loans and resulted in lower sales volumes as well as price declines on our HFS loans. In the second quarter and first half of 2021, we had gains on sales and other valuation adjustments due to higher levels of loan sales as well as gains on subsequent lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments driven by price increases on our HFS loans as a result of the market recovery following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

We expect a gradual increase in our single-family write-offs in 2022 as a result of an increase in foreclosure activity, due in part to the expiration of the CFPB rule that prohibited certain new single-family foreclosures on mortgage loans secured by the borrower’s principal residence until after December 31, 2021. See “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information on the potential credit risk impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

For information on our credit-related income or expense, which includes changes in our allowance, see “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” and “Single-Family Business Financial Results.”


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						43


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business

Multifamily Business

This section supplements and updates information regarding our Multifamily business segment in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “MD&A—Multifamily Business” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information regarding the primary business activities, lenders, competition and market share of our Multifamily business.

Multifamily Mortgage Market

Multifamily market fundamentals, which include factors such as vacancy rates and rents, remained positive during the second quarter of 2022, primarily due to pent-up demand for multifamily housing stemming from ongoing job growth, higher wages, and favorable demographics.

•Vacancy rates. Based on preliminary third-party data, we estimate that the national multifamily vacancy rate for institutional investment-type apartment properties was 4.8% as of June 30, 2022, unchanged from March 31, 2022, but down from an estimated 5.5% as of June 30, 2021. The national multifamily vacancy rate remained below its average rate of about 5.3% over the last 10 years.

•Rents. Based on preliminary third-party data, we estimate that effective rents increased by 2.5% during the second quarter of 2022 compared with an increase of 2.0% during the first quarter of 2022 and an increase of 3.0% during the second quarter of 2021. We expect annualized rent growth for 2022 will be between 6.0% and 7.0%.

Vacancy rates and rents are important to loan performance because multifamily loans are generally repaid from the cash flows generated by the underlying property. Several years of improvement in these fundamentals have helped to increase property values in most metropolitan areas. Based on preliminary multifamily property sales data, transaction volumes for early 2022 remained elevated, with capitalization rates staying low. While we expect market fundamentals will lead commercial real estate investors to remain interested in the multifamily sector this year despite higher interest rates, we do not expect annual sales to reach 2021 levels.

Multifamily construction underway remains elevated. While more than 580,000 multifamily units are scheduled to be delivered in 2022, we expect that ongoing supply chain issues make it more likely that the number of units completed this year will be closer to 400,000.

We expect the multifamily sector to continue benefiting from continued job growth, with rent growth moderating but remaining above normalized levels over the remainder of the year.

Multifamily Business Metrics

Through the secondary mortgage market, we support rental housing for the workforce population, for senior citizens and students, and for those with the greatest economic need. Approximately 93% of the multifamily units we financed in the second quarter of 2022 that were potentially eligible for housing goals credit were affordable to those earning at or below 120% of the median income in their area, providing support for both workforce housing and affordable housing.

Multifamily New Business Volume

(Dollars in billions)

(1)Reflects unpaid principal balance of multifamily Fannie Mae MBS issued, multifamily loans purchased, and credit enhancements provided on multifamily mortgage assets during the period.

(2)Reflects new units financed by first liens; excludes second liens on units for which we had financed the first lien, as well as manufactured housing rentals. Units financed reported for prior periods have been updated in this report to exclude previously included second liens and manufactured housing rentals. Second liens and manufactured housing rentals are included in unpaid principal balance.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						44


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business \| Multifamily Business Metrics

In October 2021, FHFA announced that the multifamily loan purchase cap for 2022 will be $78 billion. A minimum of 50% of loan purchases must be mission-driven, focused on specified affordable and underserved market segments. In addition, 25% of loan purchases must be affordable to residents earning 60% or less of area median income, up from the 20% requirement in 2021.

For information on how conservatorship may affect our business activities, see “Risk Factors—GSE and Conservatorship Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Presentation of Our Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business

For purposes of the information reported in this “Multifamily Business” section, we measure our multifamily guaranty book of business using the unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS. By contrast, the multifamily guaranty book of business presented in the “Composition of Fannie Mae Guaranty Book of Business” table in the “Guaranty Book of Business” section is based on the unpaid principal balance of Fannie Mae MBS outstanding. These amounts differ primarily as a result of payments we receive on underlying loans that have not yet been remitted to the MBS holders.

Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business

(Dollars in billions)

(1)Our multifamily guaranty book of business primarily consists of multifamily mortgage loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS outstanding, multifamily mortgage loans of Fannie Mae held in our retained mortgage portfolio, and other credit enhancements that we provide on multifamily mortgage assets. It does not include non-Fannie Mae multifamily mortgage-related securities held in our retained mortgage portfolio for which we do not provide a guaranty.

Average charged guaranty fee represents our effective revenue rate relative to the size of our multifamily guaranty book of business. Management uses this metric to assess the return we earn as compensation for the multifamily credit risk we manage. Average charged guaranty fee is impacted by the rate at which loans in our book of business turn over as well as the guaranty fees we charge, which are set at the time we acquire the loans. Our multifamily guaranty fee pricing is primarily based on the individual credit risk characteristics of the loans we acquire and the aggregate credit risk characteristics of our multifamily guaranty book of business. Our multifamily guaranty fee pricing is also influenced by market forces such as the availability of other sources of liquidity, our mission-related goals, the FHFA volume cap, interest rates, MBS spreads, and the management of the overall composition of our multifamily guaranty book of business. While our average charged guaranty fee increased as of June 30, 2022 from June 30, 2021, recent market volatility and uncertainty, combined with strong market competition, has resulted in lower charged guaranty fees for some new acquisitions to offset the borrowers’ higher borrowing costs.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						45


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business \| Multifamily Business Financial Results


Multifamily Business Financial Results(1)
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		2022		2021		Variance
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income	$	1,235	$	963	$	272	$	2,379	$	1,811	$	568
Fee and other income	21		23		(2)		43		48		(5)
Net revenues	1,256		986		270		2,422		1,859		563
Fair value losses, net	(14)		(60)		46		(61)		(16)		(45)
Administrative expenses	(124)		(127)		3		(249)		(252)		3
Credit-related income (expense)(2)	(20)		22		(42)		15		113		(98)
Credit enhancement expense(3)	(62)		(55)		(7)		(130)		(113)		(17)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries(4)	(4)		13		(17)		(13)		(2)		(11)
Other income (expenses), net(5)	(51)		23		(74)		(125)		(28)		(97)
Income before federal income taxes	981		802		179		1,859		1,561		298
Provision for federal income taxes	(214)		(157)		(57)		(393)		(317)		(76)
Net income	$	767	$	645	$	122	$	1,466	$	1,244	$	222

(1)See “Note 9, Segment Reporting” for information about our segment allocation methodology.

(2)Consists of the benefit or provision for credit losses and foreclosed property income or expense.

(3)Primarily consists of costs associated with our Multifamily CIRTTM (“MCIRTTM”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) programs as well as amortization expense for certain lender risk-sharing programs.

(4)Consists of change in benefits recognized from our freestanding credit enhancements that primarily relate to our Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS®”) lender risk-sharing.

(5)Consists of investment gains or losses, gains or losses from partnership investments, debt extinguishment gains or losses, and other income or expenses.

Net Interest Income

Multifamily net interest income increased in the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021 primarily due to higher guaranty fee income as a result of an increase in the size of our multifamily guaranty book of business combined with an increase in average charged guaranty fees and higher yield maintenance revenue related to the prepayment of multifamily loans.

Credit-Related Income (Expense)

Credit-related expense for the second quarter of 2022 was the result of an increase in our credit loss reserves primarily due to higher actual and projected interest rates, partially offset by solid multifamily market fundamentals.

Credit-related income for the first half of 2022 was primarily driven by solid multifamily market fundamentals, partially offset by higher actual and projected interest rates.

Credit-related income for the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily driven by a benefit from actual and projected economic data and lower expected losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” for more information on our multifamily benefit or provision for credit losses.

Other Income (Expenses), Net

The shift from other income in the second quarter of 2021 to other expenses in the second quarter of 2022 and the increase in other expenses from the first half of 2021 to the first half of 2022 were mostly driven by a shift from debt extinguishment gains in the second quarter of 2021 to debt extinguishment losses in the second quarter of 2022. The debt extinguishment losses were primarily due to increases in interest rates during the commitment period on our commitments to purchase Fannie Mae MBS, which resulted in the decline of MBS prices. As a result of our consolidation accounting, these purchases are accounted for as debt extinguishments.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						46


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business \| Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

This section supplements and updates our discussion of multifamily mortgage credit risk management in our 2021 Form 10-K in “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management.” For an overview of key elements of our mortgage credit risk management, see “Business—Managing Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Multifamily Acquisition Policy and Underwriting Standards

Our Multifamily business is responsible for pricing and managing the credit risk on our multifamily guaranty book of business, with oversight from our Enterprise Risk Management division. Multifamily loans that we purchase or that back Fannie Mae MBS are underwritten by a Fannie Mae-approved lender and may be subject to our underwriting review prior to closing, depending on the product type, loan size, market and/or other factors. Our underwriting standards generally include, among other things, property cash flow analysis and third-party appraisals.

Additionally, our standards for multifamily loans specify maximum original LTV ratio and minimum original debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) values that vary based on loan characteristics. Our experience has been that original LTV ratio and DSCR values have been reliable indicators of future credit performance. At underwriting, we evaluate the DSCR based on both actual and underwritten debt service payments. The original DSCR is calculated using the underwritten debt service payments for the loan, which assumes both principal and interest payments, including stressed assumptions in certain cases, rather than the actual debt service payments. Depending on the loan’s interest rate and structure, using the underwritten debt service payments will often result in a more conservative estimate of the debt service payments (for example, loans with an interest-only period). This approach is used for all loans, including those with full and partial interest-only terms.

The following table displays certain key risk characteristics of our multifamily guaranty book of business that we use to evaluate the risk profile and credit quality of our multifamily loans.


Key Risk Characteristics of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business
	As of
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021			June 30, 2021
Weighted-average original LTV ratio		65	%		65	%		66	%
Original LTV ratio greater than 80%		1			1			1
Original DSCR less than or equal to 1.10		12			11			11
Full term interest-only loans		35			33			31
Partial term interest-only loans(1)		50			51			52

(1)Consists of mortgage loans that were underwritten with an interest-only term, regardless of whether the loan is currently in its interest-only period.

We provide additional information on the credit characteristics of our multifamily loans in quarterly financial supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K. Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Transfer of Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk

We primarily transfer risk through our Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS®”) program, which delegates to DUS lenders the ability to underwrite and service multifamily loans, in accordance with our standards and requirements. See “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Transfer of Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a description of our DUS program.

Our DUS model typically results in our lenders sharing approximately one-third of the credit risk on our multifamily loans, either on a pro-rata or tiered basis. Loans serviced by DUS lenders and their affiliates represented substantially all of our multifamily guaranty book of business as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. In certain situations, to effectively manage our counterparty risk, we do not allow the lenders to fully share in one-third of the credit risk, but have them share in a smaller portion.

While not a large portion of our multifamily guaranty book of business, our non-DUS lenders typically also have lender risk-sharing, where the lenders typically share or absorb losses based on a negotiated percentage of the loan or the pool balance.

To complement our front-end lender-risk sharing program, we engage in back-end credit risk transfer transactions through our Multifamily CIRTTM (“MCIRTTM”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) transactions.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						47


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business \| Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

Through these transactions, we transfer a portion of the credit risk associated with a reference pool of multifamily mortgage loans to insurers, reinsurers, or investors.

We transfer multifamily credit risk through lender risk-sharing at the time of acquisition, but our multifamily back-end credit risk transfer activity occurs later, typically up to a year or more after acquisition. We did not enter into any new back-end credit risk transfer transactions in the first half of 2022. The factors that we expect will affect the extent to which we engage in multifamily credit risk transfer transactions in the future and the structure of those transactions include our risk appetite, future market conditions, the cost of the transactions, FHFA guidance or requirements (including FHFA’s scorecard), the capital relief provided by the transactions, and our overall business and capital plans.

The table below displays the total unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans and the percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business, based on unpaid principal balance, that is covered by a back-end credit risk transfer transaction. The table does not reflect front-end lender risk-sharing arrangements, as only a small portion of our multifamily guaranty book of business is not covered by these arrangements.


Multifamily Loans in Back-End Credit Risk Transfer Transactions
	As of
	June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Percentage of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business		Unpaid Principal Balance		Percentage of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business
	(Dollars in millions)
MCIRT	$	79,290	19	%	$	84,894	20	%
MCAS	25,752		6		27,088		7
Total	$	105,042	25	%	$	111,982	27	%

Multifamily Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring

As part of our ongoing credit risk management process, we and our lenders monitor the performance and risk characteristics of our multifamily loans and the underlying properties on an ongoing basis throughout the loan term at the asset and portfolio level. We closely monitor loans with an estimated current DSCR below 1.0, as that is an indicator of heightened default risk. The percentage of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business, calculated based on unpaid principal balance, with a current DSCR less than 1.0 was approximately 3% as of June 30, 2022 and 2% as of December 31, 2021.

We also manage our exposure to refinancing risk for multifamily loans maturing in the next several years. Interest rates have increased significantly since the beginning of the year and may increase further. Rising interest rates may reduce the ability of multifamily borrowers to refinance their loans, which often have balloon balances at maturity. We provide additional information on the maturity schedule of our multifamily loans in quarterly financial supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website. Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.

For additional information on credit risk characteristics of our multifamily loans and other factors that we monitor to assess the performance of our Multifamily business, see “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Multifamily Portfolio Diversification and Monitoring” in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” for the internal risk categories we use to determine our loan credit quality.

Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Foreclosure Prevention

In addition to the credit performance information on our multifamily loans provided below, we provide information about multifamily loans in a COVID-19-related forbearance that back MBS and whole loan REMICs in a “Multifamily MBS COVID-19 Forbearance List” in the “Data Collections” section of our DUS Disclose® tool, available at www.fanniemae.com/dusdisclose. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report.

Delinquency Statistics on our Multifamily Problem Loans

The percentage of our multifamily loans classified as substandard in our guaranty book of business increased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021. Substandard loans are loans that have a well-defined weakness that could impact their timely full repayment. While the majority of the substandard loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business are currently making timely payments, we continue to monitor the performance of our substandard loan population. Loans classified as substandard increased as of June 30, 2022 compared to December 31, 2021, primarily


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						48


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business \| Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

as a result of the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. While overall DSCR on the book has improved, there were a greater number of properties reporting low DSCRs in their latest annual statements. The increase was largely driven by seniors housing loans, which were disproportionally impacted by the pandemic. For more information on our credit quality indicators, including our population of substandard loans, see “Note 3, Mortgage Loans.”

Our multifamily serious delinquency rate decreased to 0.34% as of June 30, 2022 compared with 0.42% as of December 31, 2021 and 0.53% as of June 30, 2021, primarily as a result of loans that received forbearance resolving their delinquency through completion of their repayment plans or otherwise reinstating. Our multifamily serious delinquency rate consists of multifamily loans that were 60 days or more past due based on unpaid principal balance, expressed as a percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business. The percentage of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business that were 180 days or more delinquent was 0.19% as of June 30, 2022, compared with 0.23% as of December 31, 2021.

Management monitors the multifamily serious delinquency rate as an indicator of potential future credit losses and loss mitigation activities. Serious delinquency rates are reflective of our performance in assessing and managing credit risk associated with multifamily loans in our guaranty book of business. Typically, higher serious delinquency rates result in a higher allowance for loan losses.

Our multifamily serious delinquency rate, excluding loans that have received a forbearance since the start of the pandemic, was 0.03% as of June 30, 2022, compared with 0.04% as of December 31, 2021. We monitor the multifamily serious delinquency rate excluding loans that received a forbearance to better understand the impact that forbearance activity has had on the rate and to monitor loans that are seriously delinquent not as a result of COVID-19 or natural disasters.

Multifamily Loan Forbearance

As of June 30, 2022, the vast majority of our multifamily loans that have received forbearance were associated with a COVID-19-related financial hardship, but only a small portion of these loans remained in forbearance. As of June 30, 2022, there were 7 multifamily loans with an unpaid principal balance of $41 million in active forbearance, compared with 22 loans with an unpaid principal balance of $363 million as of December 31, 2021.

For additional information on our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “MD&A—Multifamily Business—Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Multifamily Problem Loan Management and Foreclosure Prevention” in our 2021 Form 10-K. We also provide additional information on multifamily forbearances in our quarterly financial supplements, which we furnish to the SEC with current reports on Form 8-K and make available on our website. Information in our quarterly financial supplements is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Multifamily REO Management

The number of multifamily foreclosed properties held for sale was 31 properties with a carrying value of $349 million as of June 30, 2022, compared with 31 properties with a carrying value of $302 million as of December 31, 2021. We expect additional foreclosures on loans that received a COVID-19 forbearance that are unable to successfully cure their delinquency through a repayment plan or other modification.

Multifamily Credit Loss Performance Metrics

The amount of multifamily credit loss or income we realize in a given period is driven by foreclosures, pre-foreclosure sales, REO activity and write-offs, net of recoveries. Our multifamily credit loss performance metrics are not defined terms and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We believe our multifamily credit losses, and our multifamily credit losses net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit, may be useful to stakeholders because they display our credit losses in the context of our multifamily guaranty book of business, including the benefit we receive from loss-sharing arrangements. Management views multifamily credit losses, net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit, as a key metric related to our multifamily business model and our strategy to share multifamily credit risk.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						49


			MD&A \| Multifamily Business \| Multifamily Mortgage Credit Risk Management

The table below displays the components of our multifamily credit loss performance metrics, as well as our multifamily initial write-off severity rate and write-off loan count.


Multifamily Credit Loss Performance Metrics
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022			2021			2022			2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Write-offs(1)	$	—		$	(13)		$	—		$	(47)
Recoveries	10			18			17			19
Foreclosed property income (expense)	(8)			(13)			(3)			(25)
Credit gains (losses)	2			(8)			14			(53)
Freestanding loss-sharing benefit (reduction in benefit)(2)	(3)			6			(10)			21
Credit gains (losses), net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit	$	(1)		$	(2)		$	4		$	(32)

Credit gain (loss) ratio (in bps)(3)	0.2			(0.8)			0.7			(2.7)
Credit gain (loss) ratio, net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit (in bps)(2)(3)	(0.1)			(0.2)			0.2			(1.6)
Multifamily initial write-off severity rate(4)	6.9		%	14.5		%	5.6		%	14.0		%
Multifamily write-off loan count	1			6			5			15

(1)Write-offs associated with non-REO sales are net of loss sharing.

(2)Represents expected benefits that we receive from write-offs as a result of certain freestanding credit enhancements, primarily multifamily DUS lender risk-sharing transactions. These benefits are recorded in “Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

(3)Calculated based on the annualized amount of “Credit gains (losses)” and “Credit gains (losses), net of freestanding loss-sharing benefit,” divided by the average multifamily guaranty book of business during the period.

(4)Rate is calculated as the initial write-off amount divided by the average defaulted unpaid principal balance. The rate excludes write-offs not associated with foreclosures or other liquidation events (such as a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or a short-sale) and any costs, gains or losses associated with REO after initial acquisition through final disposition. Write-offs are net of lender loss-sharing agreements.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						50


			MD&A \| Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information

Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information

The table below displays select credit ratios on our single-family conventional guaranty book of business and our multifamily guaranty book of business, as well as the inputs used in calculating these ratios.


Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information
	As of
	June 30, 2022									December 31, 2021
	Single-family			Multifamily			Total			Single-family			Multifamily			Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Credit loss reserves as a percentage of:
Guaranty book of business	0.15		%	0.16		%	0.15		%	0.15		%	0.17		%	0.15		%
Nonaccrual loans at amortized cost	45.31			51.94			45.96			25.63			54.49			27.35

Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of:
Guaranty book of business	0.33		%	0.31		%	0.33		%	0.57		%	0.30		%	0.54		%

Select financial information used in calculating credit ratios:
Credit loss reserves(1)	$	(5,477)		$	(684)		$	(6,161)		$	(5,088)		$	(686)		$	(5,774)
Guaranty book of business(2)	3,613,859			425,750			4,039,609			3,483,054			413,090			3,896,144
Nonaccrual loans at amortized cost	12,088			1,317			13,405			19,851			1,259			21,110

Components of credit loss reserves:
Allowance for loan losses	$	(5,389)		$	(680)		$	(6,069)		$	(4,950)		$	(679)		$	(5,629)
Allowance for accrued interest receivable	(88)			(1)			(89)			(138)			(2)			(140)
Reserve for guaranty losses(3)	—			(3)			(3)			—			(5)			(5)
Total credit loss reserves(1)	$	(5,477)		$	(684)		$	(6,161)		$	(5,088)		$	(686)		$	(5,774)

(1)Our multifamily credit loss reserves exclude the expected benefit of freestanding credit enhancements on multifamily loans of $222 million as of June 30, 2022 and $235 million as of December 31, 2021, which are recorded in “Other assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(2)Represents conventional guaranty book of business for single-family.

(3)Reserve for guaranty losses is recorded in “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Our nonaccrual loans decreased as of June 30, 2022 compared with December 31, 2021 primarily as a result of loan modifications, which bring a loan current, and loans which were able to otherwise return to accrual status.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						51


			MD&A \| Consolidated Credit Ratios and Select Credit Information


Consolidated Write-off Ratio and Select Credit Information
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2022						2021
	Single-family		Multifamily		Total		Single-family		Multifamily		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Select credit ratio:
Write-offs, net of recoveries annualized, as a percentage of the average guaranty book of business (in bps)	1.8		(0.9)		1.5		0.9		(0.5)		0.7

Select financial information used in calculating credit ratio:
Write-offs, net of recoveries	$	161	$	(10)	$	151	$	71	$	(5)	$	66
Average guaranty book of business(1)	3,590,621		422,770		4,013,391		3,324,618		400,511		3,725,129

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022						2021
	Single-family		Multifamily		Total		Single-family		Multifamily		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Select credit ratio:
Write-offs, net of recoveries annualized, as a percentage of the average guaranty book of business (in bps)	0.9		(0.8)		0.7		0.8		1.4		0.9

Select financial information used in calculating credit ratio:
Write-offs, net of recoveries	$	154	$	(17)	$	137	$	139	$	28	$	167
Average guaranty book of business(1)	3,554,766		419,544		3,974,310		3,283,380		395,190		3,678,570

(1)Average guaranty book of business is based on quarter-end balances.

Liquidity and Capital Management

Liquidity Management

This section supplements and updates information regarding liquidity management in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “MD&A—Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information, including discussions of our primary sources and uses of funds, our liquidity and funding risk management practices and contingency planning, factors that influence our debt funding activity, factors that may impact our access to or the cost of our debt funding and factors that could adversely affect our liquidity and funding. Also see “Risk Factors—Liquidity and Funding Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of liquidity and funding risks.

Debt Funding

We are currently subject to a $300 billion debt limit under our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, which will decrease to $270 billion as of December 31, 2022. The unpaid principal balance of our aggregate indebtedness was $148.3 billion as of June 30, 2022. Pursuant to the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, we are prohibited from issuing debt without the prior consent of Treasury if it would result in our aggregate indebtedness exceeding our outstanding debt limit. The calculation of our indebtedness for purposes of complying with our debt limit reflects the unpaid principal balance and excludes debt basis adjustments and debt of consolidated trusts.

Outstanding Debt

Total outstanding debt of Fannie Mae includes short-term and long-term debt and excludes debt of consolidated trusts. Short-term debt of Fannie Mae consists of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and,


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						52


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

therefore, does not include the current portion of long-term debt. Long-term debt of Fannie Mae consists of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year.

The following chart and table display information on our outstanding short-term and long-term debt based on original contractual maturity. Our long-term debt continued to decrease in the first half of 2022 as our funding needs remained low and were primarily satisfied through cash and other liquid assets that accumulated in prior periods.

Debt of Fannie Mae(1)

(Dollars in billions)

(1)Outstanding debt balance consists of the unpaid principal balance, premiums and discounts, fair value adjustments, hedge-related basis adjustments and other cost basis adjustments. Reported amounts include net discount unamortized cost basis adjustments and fair value adjustments of $3.9 billion and $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

(2)Short-term debt was $7.6 billion and $2.8 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.


Selected Debt Information
	As of
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021
	(Dollars in billions)
Selected Weighted-Average Interest Rates(1)
Interest rate on short-term debt	0.95		%	0.03		%
Interest rate on long-term debt, including portion maturing within one year	2.16		%	1.55		%
Interest rate on callable long-term debt	1.59		%	1.44		%
Selected Maturity Data
Weighted-average maturity of debt maturing within one year (in days)	105			109
Weighted-average maturity of debt maturing in more than one year (in months)	53			57
Other Data
Outstanding callable long-term debt	$	45.5		$	47.0
Connecticut Avenue Securities debt(2)	9.6			11.2

(1)Excludes the effects of fair value adjustments and hedge-related basis adjustments.

(2)Represents CAS debt issued prior to November 2018. See “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk—Credit Risk Transfer Transactions” in our 2021 Form 10-K for information regarding our Connecticut Avenue Securities.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						53


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

We intend to repay our short-term and long-term debt obligations as they become due primarily through cash from business operations, the sale of other liquid assets and the issuance of additional debt securities.

For information on the maturity profile of our outstanding long-term debt, see “Note 7, Short-Term and Long-Term Debt.”

Debt Funding Activity

The table below displays activity in debt of Fannie Mae. This activity excludes the debt of consolidated trusts and intraday borrowing. The reported amounts of debt issued and paid off during each period represent the face amount of the debt at issuance and redemption.

Although we had a substantial increase in short-term debt issued during the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021, most of the short-term debt issued was paid off during the quarter, and we ended the second quarter with $7.6 billion in outstanding short-term debt. As our funding needs remained low, we did not issue new long-term debt in the first half of 2022. The increase in long-term debt paid off during the second quarter and first half of 2022 compared with the second quarter and first half of 2021 was primarily due to a higher volume of maturing shorter duration long-term debt in the second quarter and first half of 2022.


Activity in Debt of Fannie Mae
	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,

	2022			2021			2022			2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Issued during the period:
Short-term:
Amount	$	19,468		$	8,284		$	67,945		$	13,426
Weighted-average interest rate(1)	0.79		%	(0.02)		%	0.27		%	(0.01)		%
Long-term:(2)
Amount	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	2,815
Weighted-average interest rate	—		%	—		%	—		%	0.59		%
Total issued:
Amount	$	19,468		$	8,284		$	67,945		$	16,241
Weighted-average interest rate	0.79		%	(0.02)		%	0.27		%	0.09		%
Paid off during the period:(3)
Short-term:
Amount	$	14,452		$	8,861		$	61,679		$	23,320
Weighted-average interest rate(1)	0.45		%	*			0.14		%	0.06		%
Long-term:(2)
Amount	$	38,561		$	21,777		$	58,914		$	30,227
Weighted-average interest rate	0.99		%	1.03		%	1.00		%	1.03		%
Total paid off:
Amount	$	53,013		$	30,638		$	120,593		$	53,547
Weighted-average interest rate	0.84		%	0.73		%	0.56		%	0.61		%

* Represents a weighted-average interest rate of less than 0.005%.

(1)Includes interest generated from negative interest rates on certain repurchase agreements, which offset our short-term funding costs.

(2)Includes credit risk-sharing securities issued as CAS debt prior to November 2018. For information on our credit risk transfer transactions, see “MD&A—Single-Family Business—Single-Family Mortgage Credit Risk Management—Single-Family Credit Enhancement and Transfer of Mortgage Credit Risk—Credit Risk Transfer Transactions” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

(3)Consists of all payments on debt, including regularly scheduled principal payments, payments at maturity, payments resulting from calls and payments for any other repurchases. Repurchases of debt and early retirements of zero-coupon debt are reported at original face value, which does not equal the amount of actual cash payment.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						54


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We enter into certain business arrangements to facilitate our statutory purpose of providing liquidity to the secondary mortgage market and to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Some of these arrangements are not recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets or may be recorded in amounts different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction, depending on the nature or structure of, and the accounting required to be applied to, the arrangement. These arrangements are commonly referred to as “off-balance sheet arrangements” and expose us to potential losses in excess of the amounts recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Our off-balance sheet arrangements result primarily from the following:

•our guaranty of mortgage loan securitization and resecuritization transactions over which we have no control, which are reflected in our unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS net of any beneficial ownership interest we retain, and other financial guarantees that we do not control;

•liquidity support transactions; and

•partnership interests.

The total amount of our off-balance sheet exposure related to unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS net of any beneficial interest that we retain, and other financial guarantees was $261.1 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $226.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. The majority of the other financial guarantees consists of Freddie Mac securities backing Fannie Mae structured securities. See “Guaranty Book of Business” and “Note 6, Financial Guarantees” for more information regarding our maximum exposure to loss on unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and Freddie Mac securities.

Our total outstanding liquidity commitments to advance funds for securities backed by multifamily housing revenue bonds totaled $5.2 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $5.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. These commitments require us to advance funds to third parties that enable them to repurchase tendered bonds or securities that are unable to be remarketed. We hold cash and cash equivalents in our other investments portfolio in excess of these commitments to advance funds.

We make investments in various limited partnerships and similar legal entities, which consist of low-income housing tax credit investments, community investments and other entities. When we do not have a controlling financial interest in those entities, our condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect only our investment rather than the full amount of the partnership’s assets and liabilities. See “Note 2, Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets—Unconsolidated VIEs” for information regarding our limited partnerships and similar legal entities.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						55


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

Other Investments Portfolio

The chart below displays information on the composition of our other investments portfolio. The balance of our other investments portfolio fluctuates as a result of changes in our cash flows, liquidity in the fixed-income markets, and our liquidity risk management framework and practices.

Our other investments portfolio decreased during the first half of 2022 primarily due to a decrease in our holdings of U.S. Treasury securities, including those classified as cash and cash equivalents. We used cash and other liquid assets that accumulated in prior periods to fund our operations and to pay off maturing debt during the first half of 2022.


						Cash and cash equivalents(1)

						Securities purchased under agreements to resell(2)

						U.S. Treasury securities

(1) Cash equivalents are composed of overnight repurchase agreements and U.S. Treasuries that have a maturity at the date of acquisition of three months or less.

(2) We held $2.0 billion and $7.2 billion in securities purchased under agreements to resell as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2022. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents decreased from $108.6 billion as of December 31, 2021 to $75.9 billion as of June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by cash outflows from (1) payments on outstanding debt of consolidated trusts, (2) the redemption of funding debt, which outpaced issuances, primarily for the reasons described above, and (3) purchases of loans held for investment.

Partially offsetting these cash outflows were cash inflows from (1) the sale of Fannie Mae MBS to third parties and (2) proceeds from repayments of loans.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021. Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents increased from $115.6 billion as of December 31, 2020 to $125.3 billion as of June 30, 2021. The increase was primarily driven by cash inflows from (1) the sale of Fannie Mae MBS to third parties and (2) proceeds from repayments and sales of loans.

Partially offsetting these cash inflows were cash outflows primarily from (1) payments on outstanding debt of consolidated trusts, (2) purchases of loans held for investment, and (3) the redemption of funding debt, which outpaced issuances, primarily for the reasons described above.

Credit Ratings

Our credit ratings from the major credit ratings organizations, as well as the credit ratings of the U.S. government, are primary factors that could affect our ability to access the capital markets and our cost of funds. For more information on our credit ratings, see “MD&A—Liquidity and Capital Management—Liquidity Management—Credit Ratings” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

The table below displays the credit ratings issued by the three major credit rating agencies.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						56


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

Fannie Mae Credit Ratings

As of June 30, 2022

S&P

Moody’s

Fitch

Long-term senior debt

AA+

Aaa

AAA

Short-term senior debt

A-1+

P-1

F1+

Preferred stock

Ca(hyb)

C/RR6

Outlook

Stable

(for Long-Term Senior Debt)

(for AAA rated Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings)

In July 2022, Fitch affirmed our “AAA” long-term issuer default rating and revised our rating outlook to stable from negative, following its affirmation of the United States’ “AAA” issuer default rating with a stable outlook. Fitch noted that Fannie Mae’s long-term issuer default rating is directly linked to the United States’ long-term issuer default rating, based on Fitch’s view of the U.S. government’s direct financial support of Fannie Mae.

Capital Management

Capital Requirements

FHFA published a final rule establishing a new enterprise regulatory capital framework for the GSEs in December 2020. FHFA published a final rule amending the enterprise regulatory capital framework in March 2022. We refer to the rule’s requirements, as amended, as the “enterprise regulatory capital framework.” The enterprise regulatory capital framework establishes new supplemental leverage and risk-based capital requirements for the GSEs. Under the leverage capital requirements, we must maintain a tier 1 capital ratio of 2.5% of adjusted total assets. Under the risk-based capital requirements, we must maintain minimum common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total capital ratios of 4.5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, of risk-weighted assets. For more information on the enterprise regulatory capital framework, see “Business—Legislation and Regulation—GSE-Focused Matters—Capital” in our 2021 Form 10-K, “Legislation and Regulation—Final Rule Amending the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework” in our First Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q and the discussion of amendments to the enterprise regulatory capital framework in “Legislation and Regulation” in this report. The enterprise regulatory capital framework requires substantially higher levels of capital than the previously applicable statutory minimum capital requirement.

Although the enterprise regulatory capital framework went into effect in February 2021, we are not required to hold capital according to the framework’s requirements until the date of termination of our conservatorship, or such later date as may be ordered by FHFA.

Beginning in 2022, on a quarterly basis, we are required to report to FHFA and disclose in an appropriate publicly available filing or other document our regulatory capital levels, buffers, adjusted total assets, and total risk-weighted assets under the standardized approach of the enterprise regulatory capital framework.

The enterprise regulatory capital framework provides a granular assessment of credit risk specific to different mortgage loan categories, as well as components for market risk and operational risk. The enterprise regulatory capital framework includes the following requirements:

•Supplemental capital requirements relating to the amount and form of the capital we hold, based largely on definitions of capital used in U.S. banking regulators’ regulatory capital framework. The enterprise regulatory capital framework specifies complementary leverage and risk-based requirements, which together determine the requirements for each tier of capital;

•A requirement that we hold prescribed capital buffers that can be drawn down in periods of financial stress and then rebuilt over time as economic conditions improve. If we fall below the prescribed buffer amounts, we must restrict capital distributions such as stock repurchases and dividends, as well as discretionary bonus payments to executives, until the buffer amounts are restored. The prescribed capital buffers represent the amount of capital we are required to hold above the minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements.

◦The prescribed leverage buffer amount (“PLBA”) represents the amount of tier 1 capital we are required to hold above the minimum tier 1 leverage capital requirement;

◦The risk-based capital buffers consist of three separate components: a stability capital buffer, a stress capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. Taken together, these risk-based buffers comprise the prescribed capital conservation buffer amount (“PCCBA”). The PCCBA must be comprised entirely of common equity tier 1 capital; and


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						57


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

•Specific minimum percentages, or “floors,” on the risk-weights applicable to single-family and multifamily exposures, as well as retained portions of credit risk transfer transactions.

The table below sets forth information about our capital requirements under the standardized approach of the enterprise regulatory capital framework. Available capital for purposes of the enterprise regulatory capital framework excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion) and other amounts specified in footnote 3 to the table below. Because of these exclusions, we had a deficit in available capital as of June 30, 2022, even though we had positive net worth under GAAP of $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022.

We had a $262 billion shortfall of our available capital (deficit) to the adjusted total capital requirement (including buffers) of $185 billion under the standardized approach of the rule as of June 30, 2022. Our capital shortfall decreased $10 billion from $272 billion as of March 31, 2022, primarily as a result of an increase in our retained earnings and lower capital requirements due to single-family CRT issuances and home price appreciation.


Capital Metrics under the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework as of June 30, 2022(1)
(Dollars in billions)
							Stress capital buffer						$	34
							Stability capital buffer						45
Adjusted total assets		$	4,545				Countercyclical capital buffer						—
Risk-weighted assets		1,325					Prescribed capital conservation buffer amount						$	79

		Minimum Capital Ratio Requirement			Minimum Capital Requirement		Applicable Buffers(2)		Total Capital Requirement (including Buffers)		Available Capital (Deficit)(3)		Capital Shortfall(4)
Risk-based capital:
	Total capital(5)	8.0		%	$	106	N/A		$	106	$	(58)	$	(164)
	Common equity tier 1 capital	4.5			60		$	79	139		(96)		(235)
	Tier 1 capital	6.0			80		79		159		(77)		(236)
	Adjusted total capital	8.0			106		79		185		(77)		(262)
Leverage capital:
	Core capital(6)	2.5			114		N/A		114		(64)		(178)
	Tier 1 capital	2.5			114		23		137		(77)		(214)

(1)Ratios are calculated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for risk-based capital metrics and as a percentage of adjusted total assets for leverage capital metrics.

(2)The applicable buffer for common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total capital is the PCCBA, which is composed of a stress capital buffer, a stability capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. The applicable buffer for tier 1 capital (leverage based) is the PLBA. The stress capital buffer and countercyclical capital buffer are each calculated by multiplying prescribed factors by adjusted total assets as of the last day of the previous calendar quarter. The 2022 stability capital buffer is calculated by multiplying a factor determined based on our share of mortgage debt outstanding by adjusted total assets as of December 31, 2020. The prescribed leverage buffer for 2022 is set at 50% of the 2022 stability buffer. Going forward the stability buffer and the prescribed leverage buffer will be updated with an effective date that depends on whether the stability capital buffer increases or decreases relative to the previously calculated value.

(3)Available capital (deficit) for all line items excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion). Available capital (deficit) for all line items except total capital and core capital also deducts a portion of deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences between GAAP and tax requirements are deducted from capital to the extent they exceed 10% of common equity. As of June 30, 2022, this resulted in the full deduction of deferred tax assets ($12.4 billion) from our available capital (deficit). Available capital (deficit) for common equity tier 1 capital also excludes the value of the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock ($19.1 billion).

(4)Our capital shortfall consists of the difference between the applicable capital requirement (including buffers) and the applicable available capital (deficit).

(5)The sum of (a) core capital (see definition in footnote 6 below); and (b) a general allowance for foreclosure losses, which (i) shall include an allowance for portfolio mortgage losses, an allowance for non-reimbursable foreclosure costs on government claims, and an allowance for liabilities reflected on the balance sheet for estimated foreclosure losses on mortgage-backed securities; and (ii) shall not include any reserves made or held against specific assets; and (c) any other amounts from sources of funds available to absorb losses that the Director of FHFA by regulation determines are appropriate to include in determining total capital.

(6)The sum of (a) the stated value of our outstanding common stock (common stock less treasury stock); (b) the stated value of our outstanding non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock; (c) our paid-in capital; and (d) our retained earnings (accumulated deficit). Core capital does not include: (a) accumulated other comprehensive income or (b) senior preferred stock.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						58


			MD&A \| Liquidity and Capital Management

enterprise regulatory capital framework, our maximum payout ratio represents the percentage of eligible retained income that we are permitted to pay out in the form of distributions or discretionary bonus payments under the enterprise regulatory capital framework. The maximum payout ratio for a given quarter is the lowest of the payout ratios determined by our capital conservation buffer and our leverage buffer. See “Note 14—Regulatory Capital Requirements” in this report for information on our capital ratios as of June 30, 2022 under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.

Capital Activity

Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, no dividends were payable to Treasury for the second quarter of 2022 and none are payable for the third quarter of 2022.

Under the terms governing the senior preferred stock, through and including the capital reserve end date, any increase in our net worth during a fiscal quarter results in an increase in the same amount of the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock in the following quarter. The capital reserve end date is defined as the last day of the second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital framework.

As a result of these terms governing the senior preferred stock, the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock increased by $4.4 billion to $173.3 billion as of June 30, 2022, due to the $4.4 billion increase in our net worth in the first quarter of 2022. The aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock will further increase to $177.9 billion as of September 30, 2022, due to the $4.6 billion increase in our net worth in the second quarter of 2022. See “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform—Treasury Agreements” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information on the terms of our senior preferred stock, including how the aggregate liquidation preference is determined.

Increases in our net worth improve our capital position and our ability to absorb losses; however, increases in our net worth also increase the aggregate liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock by the same amount until the capital reserve end date as discussed above.

Treasury Funding Commitment

Treasury made a commitment under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under certain circumstances if we have a net worth deficit. As of June 30, 2022, the remaining amount of Treasury’s funding commitment to us was $113.9 billion. See “Note 11, Equity” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information on the funding commitment provided by Treasury under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.

Risk Management

Our business activities expose us to the following major categories of risk: credit risk (including mortgage credit risk and institutional counterparty credit risk), market risk (including interest-rate risk), liquidity and funding risk, and operational risk (including cyber/information security risk, third-party risk and model risk), as well as strategic risk, compliance risk and reputational risk. See “MD&A—Risk Management” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of our management of these risks. This section supplements and updates that discussion but does not address all of the risk management categories described in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management

This section supplements and updates our discussion of institutional counterparty credit risk management in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “MD&A—Risk Management—Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management” and “Risk Factors—Credit Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of our exposure to institutional counterparty credit risk and our strategy for managing this risk. Also see “Note 10, Concentrations of Credit Risk” in this report for an update on our counterparty credit risk exposure.

Change in Non-Depository Seller and Servicer Liquidity Requirements

A large portion of the loans in our single-family guaranty book, including a large portion of our seriously delinquent loans, are serviced by non-depository servicers. Compared with depository financial institutions, these institutions pose additional risks to us because they may not have the same financial strength or operational capacity, or be subject to the same level of regulatory oversight, as our largest depository mortgage servicer counterparties. Unlike for depository servicers, much of the capital of non-depository servicers is represented by the value of mortgage servicing rights, which is subject to variability based on market conditions and therefore is an important factor in determining capital adequacy. We require single-family non-depository servicers to meet minimum liquidity requirements to maintain


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						59


			MD&A \| Risk Management \| Institutional Counterparty Credit Risk Management

eligibility with Fannie Mae. We actively monitor the financial condition and capital adequacy of these non-depository servicers, including their compliance with our requirements.

In February 2022, FHFA re-proposed the minimum financial eligibility requirements for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sellers and servicers. If adopted as proposed, the requirements will increase capital and liquidity requirements for our single-family non-depository sellers and servicers.

Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management

We are subject to market risk, which includes interest-rate risk and spread risk. These risks arise from our mortgage asset investments. Interest-rate risk is the risk that movements in benchmark interest rates could adversely affect the fair value of our assets or liabilities or our future earnings. Spread risk represents the change in an instrument’s fair value that relates to factors other than changes in the benchmark interest rate.

We are exposed to interest-rate risk through our “net portfolio,” which we define as our retained mortgage portfolio assets; other investments portfolio; outstanding debt of Fannie Mae used to fund the retained mortgage portfolio assets and other investments portfolio; and mortgage commitments and risk management derivatives. Our goal is to manage interest-rate risk from our net portfolio to be neutral to movements in interest rates and volatility on an economic basis, subject to model constraints and prevailing market conditions. We actively manage the interest-rate risk of our net portfolio through the use of interest-rate derivatives and by issuing a broad range of both callable and non-callable debt instruments.

We are also exposed to interest-rate risk in connection with mortgage assets held by our consolidated MBS trusts. One exposure is cost basis adjustments that often result from upfront cash fees exchanged at the time of loan acquisition, which include buy-ups, buy-downs, and loan-level risk-based price adjustments. Another exposure is the float income earned by MBS trusts on the short-term reinvestment of loan payments received from borrowers in highly liquid investments with short maturities, such as U.S. Treasury securities. This float income is paid to us as trust management income and recorded within “Net interest income” in our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Changes in interest rates can influence mortgage prepayment rates and float reinvestment yields. Therefore, they impact the timing of when we recognize amortization income related to cost basis amounts as well as the amount of float income generated by MBS trusts, thereby impacting our earnings. Typically, interest-rate driven changes in the timing of income recognition related to cost basis amortization are partially offset by interest-rate driven changes in the amount of float income earned. See “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income—Analysis of Deferred Amortization Income” for more information on our outstanding net cost basis adjustments related to consolidated MBS trusts.

We do not currently actively manage or hedge, on an economic basis, our spread risk or the interest-rate risk arising from cost basis adjustments and float income associated with mortgage assets held by our consolidated MBS trusts.

For additional information on the impact of interest-rate risk on our earnings, see “Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk” below.

This section supplements and updates information regarding market risk management in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “MD&A—Risk Management—Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management” and “Risk Factors—Market and Industry Risk” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information, including our sources of interest-rate risk exposure, business risks posed by changes in interest rates, and our strategy for managing interest-rate risk.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						60


MD&A \| Risk Management \| Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management

Measurement of Interest-Rate Risk

The table below displays the pre-tax market value sensitivity of our net portfolio to changes in the level of interest rates and the slope of the yield curve as measured on the last day of each period presented.

The table below also provides the daily average, minimum, maximum and standard deviation values for duration gap and for the most adverse market value impact on the net portfolio to changes in the level of interest rates and the slope of the yield curve for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021. Our practice is to allow interest rates to go below zero in the downward shock models unless otherwise prevented through contractual floors.

For information on how we measure our interest-rate risk, see our 2021 Form 10-K in “MD&A—Risk Management—Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management.”


Interest-Rate Sensitivity of Net Portfolio to Changes in Interest-Rate Level and Slope of Yield Curve
	As of (1)(2)
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Rate level shock:
-100 basis points		$	(126)		$	(184)
-50 basis points		(48)			(69)
+50 basis points		32			54
+100 basis points		54			75
Rate slope shock:
-25 basis points (flattening)		(7)			(8)
+25 basis points (steepening)		6			8


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, (1)(3)
	2022							2021
	Duration Gap	Rate Slope Shock 25 bps			Rate Level Shock 50 bps			Duration Gap	Rate Slope Shock 25 bps			Rate Level Shock 50 bps
		Market Value Sensitivity							Market Value Sensitivity
	(In years)	(Dollars in millions)						(In years)	(Dollars in millions)
Average	(0.03)		$	(5)		$	(36)	0.02		$	(11)		$	(60)
Minimum	(0.05)		(8)			(62)		(0.04)		(17)			(118)
Maximum	0.02		—			(12)		0.10		(3)			(18)
Standard deviation	0.02		2			13		0.03		4			27

(1)Computed based on changes in U.S. LIBOR interest-rates swap curve. Changes in the level of interest rates assume a parallel shift in all maturities of the U.S. LIBOR interest-rate swap curve. Changes in the slope of the yield curve assume a constant 7-year rate, a shift of 16.7 basis points for the 1-year rate (and shorter tenors) and an opposite shift of 8.3 basis points for the 30-year rate. Rate shocks for remaining maturity points are interpolated.

(2)Measured on the last business day of each period presented.

(3)Computed based on daily values during the period presented.

The market value sensitivity of our net portfolio varies across a range of interest-rate shocks depending upon the duration and convexity profile of our net portfolio. The market value sensitivity of the net portfolio is measured by quantifying the change in the present value of the cash flows of our financial assets and liabilities that would result from an instantaneous shock to interest rates, assuming spreads are held constant. For the subset of floating-rate liabilities and assets that are indexed to LIBOR or SOFR, the interest component of their future cash flows is calculated using the projection of the corresponding index rate. For all assets and liabilities, the discount factor used to calculate the present value of the future cash flows is constructed using the LIBOR yield curve.

LIBOR rate quotes will cease on June 30, 2023, and after that date the interest accrued on floating-rate instruments that are contractually indexed to LIBOR will reset based on SOFR. Before that LIBOR cessation date, the portfolio interest-rate risk measurement process will transition from using LIBOR to using SOFR as the benchmark interest rate. This change is not expected to have a significant impact on measurement of our interest-rate risk on our financial results.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						61


MD&A \| Risk Management \| Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management

We use derivatives to help manage the residual interest-rate risk exposure between the assets and liabilities in our net portfolio. Derivatives have enabled us to keep our economic interest-rate risk exposure at consistently low levels in a wide range of interest-rate environments. The table below displays an example of how derivatives impacted the net market value exposure for a 50 basis point parallel interest-rate shock. For additional information on our derivative positions, see “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” in our 2021 Form 10-K and in this report.


Derivative Impact on Interest-Rate Risk (50 Basis Points)
	As of (1)
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Before derivatives		$	(306)		$	(539)
After derivatives		(48)			(69)
Effect of derivatives		258			470

(1)Measured on the last business day of each period presented.

Earnings Exposure to Interest-Rate Risk

While we manage the interest-rate risk of our net portfolio with the objective of remaining neutral to movements in interest rates and volatility on an economic basis, our earnings can experience volatility due to interest-rate changes and differing accounting treatments that apply to certain financial instruments on our balance sheet. Specifically, we have exposure to earnings volatility that is driven by changes in interest rates in two primary areas: our net portfolio and our consolidated MBS trusts. The exposure in the net portfolio is primarily driven by changes in the fair value of risk management derivatives, mortgage commitments, and certain assets, primarily securities, that are carried at fair value. The exposure related to our consolidated MBS trusts relates to changes in our credit loss reserves and to the amortization of cost basis adjustments resulting from changes in interest rates.

We apply fair value hedge accounting to address some of the exposure to interest rates, particularly the earnings volatility related to changes in benchmark interest rates, including LIBOR and SOFR. Although our hedge accounting program is designed to address the volatility of our financial results associated with changes in fair value related to changes in the benchmark interest rates, earnings variability driven by other factors, such as spreads or changes in cost basis amortization recognized in net interest income, remains. In addition, our ability to effectively reduce earnings volatility is dependent upon the volume and type of interest-rate swaps available, which is driven by our interest-rate risk management strategy discussed above. As our range of available interest-rate swaps varies over time, our ability to reduce earnings volatility through hedge accounting may vary as well. When the shape of the yield curve shifts significantly from period to period, hedge accounting may be less effective. In our current program, we establish new hedging relationships daily to provide flexibility in our overall risk management strategy.

See “MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations—Hedge Accounting Impact” and “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K and “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” in this report for additional information on our fair value hedge accounting policy and related disclosures.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management judgment and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We describe our most significant accounting policies in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in this report and in our 2021 Form 10-K.

We evaluate our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update them as necessary based on changing conditions. Management has discussed any significant changes in judgments and assumptions in applying our critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. See “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K for a discussion of the risks associated with the need for management to make judgments and estimates in applying our accounting policies and methods. We have identified one of our accounting estimates, allowance for loan losses, as critical because it involves significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different judgments and assumptions could have a material impact on our reported results of operations or financial condition.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						62


			MD&A \| Critical Accounting Estimates

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of single-family and multifamily HFI loan receivables that we expect will not be collected related to loans held by Fannie Mae or by consolidated Fannie Mae MBS trusts. The expected credit losses are deducted from the amortized cost basis of HFI loans to present the net amount expected to be received.

The allowance for loan losses involves substantial judgment on a number of matters including the development and weighting of macroeconomic forecasts, the reversion period applied, the assessment of similar risk characteristics, which determines the historic loss experience used to derive probability of loan default, the valuation of collateral, and the determination of a loan’s remaining expected life. Our most significant judgments involved in estimating our allowance for loan losses relate to the macroeconomic data used to develop reasonable and supportable forecasts for key economic drivers, which are subject to significant inherent uncertainty. Most notably, for single-family, the model uses forecasted single-family home prices as well as a range of possible future interest rate environments, which drive prepayment speeds and impact the measurement of the economic concession provided on loans modified in a restructuring which are accounted for as a TDR. For multifamily, the model uses forecasted rental income and property valuations. For purposes of the macroeconomic sensitivities disclosed below, we have determined that our single-family home price forecast and interest rate forecast are the most significant judgments used in our estimation of credit losses for the periods presented below.

In future periods, changes in projected interest rates may not be as significant to our measurement of expected credit losses. Pursuant to our adoption of ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 2022, we prospectively discontinued TDR accounting and no longer measure the economic concession for loan modifications occurring on or after the adoption date. In addition, modifications to loans previously designated as TDRs that occur on or after January 1, 2022, are accounted for under the newly adopted ASU and result in the elimination of any prior economic concession recorded in the allowance related to such loans. Although increases in interest rates were a meaningful driver of our credit-related expense in the first half of 2022, we expect the decrease in the balance of loans that were previously designated as TDRs will reduce the sensitivity of our credit-related income (expense) to interest rate volatility over time. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance” for more information about our adoption of ASU 2022-02.

Quantitative Component

We use a discounted cash flow method to measure expected credit losses on our single-family mortgage loans and an undiscounted loss method to measure expected credit losses on our multifamily mortgage loans. The models use reasonable and supportable forecasts for key macroeconomic drivers.

Our modeled loan performance is based on our historical experience of loans with similar risk characteristics adjusted to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Our historical loss experience and our loan loss estimates capture the possibility of a multitude of events, including remote events that could result in credit losses on loans that are considered low risk. Our credit loss models, including the macroeconomic forecast data used as key inputs, are subject to our model oversight and review processes as well as other established governance and controls.

Qualitative Component, including Management Adjustments

Our process for measuring expected credit losses is complex and involves significant management judgment, including a reliance on historical loss information and current economic forecasts that may not be representative of credit losses we ultimately realize. Management adjustments may be necessary to take into consideration external factors and current macroeconomic events that have occurred but are not yet reflected in the data used to derive the model outputs. Qualitative factors and events not previously observed by the models through historical loss experience are also considered, as well as the uncertainty of their impact on credit loss estimates.

In the second quarter of 2022, management supplemented model results to reflect some recent market indicators that suggest home price growth may be moderating at a faster pace than indicated by model results for the quarter. See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional information on recent market conditions.

Macroeconomic Variables and Sensitivities

Our credit-related income or expense can vary substantially from period to period based on forecasted macroeconomic drivers; primarily home prices and interest rates related to our single-family book of business. We develop regional forecasts for single-family home prices using a multi-path simulation that captures home price projections over a five-year period, which is the period for which we can develop reasonable and supportable forecasts. After the five-year period, the home price forecast reverts to a historical long-term growth rate. Additionally, our model projects the range of possible interest rate scenarios over the life of the loan. This process captures multiple possible outcomes of what could be more or less favorable economic environments for the borrower, and therefore will increase or decrease the likelihood of default or prepayment depending on the environment in each path of the simulation.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						63


			MD&A \| Critical Accounting Estimates

The table below provides information about our most significant key macroeconomic inputs used in determining our single-family allowance for loan losses: forecasted home price growth rates and interest rates. Although the model consumes a wide range of possible regional home price forecasts and interest rate scenarios that take into account inherent uncertainty, the forecasts below represent the mean path of those simulations used in determining the allowance for each quarter through the six months ended June 30, 2022, and for each quarter during the year ended December 31, 2021, and how those forecasts have changed between periods of estimate. Below we present the two succeeding periods used in our estimate of expected credit losses. The forecasts consider periods beyond those presented below.


Select Single-Family Macroeconomic Model Inputs(1)

Forecasted home price growth rate by period of estimate:(2)
	For the Full Year ending December 31,
	2022		2023		2024
Second Quarter 2022	16.0	%	4.4	%	0.5	%
First Quarter 2022	10.8		3.2		1.3

	For the Full Year ending December 31,
	2021		2022		2023
Fourth Quarter 2021	18.8	%	8.2	%	2.9	%
Third Quarter 2021	18.4		7.9		2.4
Second Quarter 2021	14.8		5.4		2.5
First Quarter 2021	8.8		2.5		1.7

Forecasted 30-year interest rates by period of estimate:(3)
	Through the end of December 31,		For the Full Year ending December 31,
	2022		2023		2024
Second Quarter 2022	5.7	%	5.4	%	5.2	%
First Quarter 2022	4.7		4.8		4.7

	Through the end of December 31,		For the Full Year ending December 31,
	2021		2022		2023
Fourth Quarter 2021	3.2	%	3.5	%	3.7	%
Third Quarter 2021	3.1		3.4		3.7
Second Quarter 2021	3.1		3.4		3.6
First Quarter 2021	3.1		3.3		3.6

(1)These forecasts are provided here solely for the purpose of providing insight into our credit loss model. Forecasts for future periods are subject to significant uncertainty, which increases for periods that are further in the future. We provide our most recent forecasts for certain macroeconomic and housing market conditions in “Key Market Economic Indicators.” In addition, each month our Economic & Strategic Research group provides its forecast of economic and housing market conditions, which are available in the “Research and Insights” section of our website, www.fanniemae.com.

(2)These estimates are based on our national home price index, which is calculated differently from the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index and therefore results in different percentages for comparable growth. We continually update our home price growth estimates and forecasts as new data become available. As a result, the forecast data in this table may also differ from the forecasted home price growth rate presented in “Key Market Economic Indicators,” because that section reflects our most recent forecast as of the filing date of this report, while this table reflects the quantitative forecast data we used in our model to estimate credit losses for the periods shown. Management continues to monitor macroeconomic updates to our inputs in our credit loss model from the time they are approved as part of our established governance process, through the date of filing, to ensure the reasonableness of the inputs used to calculate estimated credit losses. The forecast data excludes the impact of any qualitative adjustments.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						64


			MD&A \| Critical Accounting Estimates

(3)Forecasted 30-year interest rates represent the mean of possible future interest rate environments that are simulated by our interest rate model and used in the estimation of credit losses. Forecasts through the end of December 31, 2022 and 2021 represent the average forecasted rate from the quarter-end through the calendar year end of December 31st. The fourth quarter of 2021 interest rate represents the 30-year interest rate as of December 31, 2021. This table reflects the forecasted interest rate data we used in estimating credit losses for the periods shown and does not reflect changes in interest rates that occurred after the forecast date.

It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one factor or input might affect the overall credit loss estimates, because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for loan losses. Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or loan types, and changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in others. Changes in our assumptions and forecasts of economic conditions could significantly affect our estimate of expected credit losses and lead to significant changes in the estimate from one reporting period to the next.

As noted above, our allowance for loan losses is sensitive to changes in home prices and interest rate changes. To consider the impact of a hypothetical change in home price appreciation, assuming a one-percentage point increase in the home price growth rate for the first twelve months of the forecast, on a normalized basis, with all other factors held constant, the single-family allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2022 would decrease by approximately 2%. Conversely, assuming a one-percentage point decrease in the home price growth rate for the first twelve months of the forecast, on a normalized basis, the single-family allowance for loan losses would increase by approximately 2%.

To consider the impact of a hypothetical change in 30-year interest rates, assuming a 50-basis point increase in estimated 30-year interest rates, with all other factors held constant, the single-family allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2022 would increase by approximately 3%. Conversely, assuming a 50-basis point decrease in 30-year interest rates, the single-family allowance for loan losses would decrease by approximately 3%.

These sensitivity analyses are hypothetical and are provided solely for the purpose of providing insight into our credit loss model inputs. In addition, sensitivities for home price and interest rate changes are non-linear. As a result, changes in these estimates are not incrementally proportional. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an indication of the impact of home price appreciation and 30-year interest rates on the estimate of the allowance for credit losses. For example, it is not intended to imply management’s expectation of future changes in our forecasts or any other variables that may change as a result.

We provide more detailed information on our accounting for the allowance for loan losses in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K. See “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses” for additional information about our current period benefit (provision) for loan losses.

See “Key Market Economic Indicators” for additional information about how home prices can affect our credit loss estimates, including a discussion of home price appreciation and our home price forecast. Also see “Consolidated Results of Operations—Credit-Related Income (Expense)” for information on how our home price forecast impacted our single-family benefit (provision) for credit losses.

Impact of Future Adoption of New Accounting Guidance

We identify and discuss the expected impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements of recently issued accounting guidance in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). In addition, we and our senior management may from time to time make forward-looking statements in our other filings with the SEC, our other publicly available written statements, and orally to analysts, investors, the news media and others. Forward-looking statements often include words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “likely,” “may,” “will” or similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements in this report include, among others, statements relating to our expectations regarding the following matters:

•our future financial performance and the factors that will affect such performance;

•economic, mortgage market and housing market conditions (including expectations regarding economic growth, home price growth, refinance volumes and interest rates), the factors that will affect those conditions, and the impact of those conditions on our business and financial results;

•our business plans and their impact;


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						65


			MD&A \| Forward-Looking Statements

•our plans relating to and the effects of our credit risk transfer transactions, as well as the factors that will affect our engagement in future transactions;

•volatility in our financial results and the impact of our adoption of hedge accounting on such volatility;

•the size and composition of our retained mortgage portfolio;

•the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance;

•our payments to HUD and Treasury funds under the GSE Act;

•the risks to our business;

•future forbearances, modifications and write-offs relating to the loans in our guaranty book of business and the factors that will affect them;

•the performance of loans in our book of business, including loans in forbearance, and the factors that will affect such performance;

•how we intend to meet our debt obligations; and

•our response to legal and regulatory proceedings and their impact on our business or financial condition.

Forward-looking statements reflect our management’s current expectations, forecasts or predictions of future conditions, events or results based on various assumptions and management’s estimates of trends and economic factors in the markets in which we are active and that otherwise impact our business plans. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. By their nature, forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements.

There are a number of factors that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ materially from those described in our forward-looking statements, including, among others, the following:

•uncertainty regarding our future, our exit from conservatorship and our ability to raise or earn the capital needed to meet our capital requirements;

•significant challenges we face in retaining and hiring qualified executives and other employees;

•the duration, spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; the actions taken to contain the virus or treat its impact, including government actions to mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccination rates; the effectiveness of available COVID-19 vaccines over time and against variants of the coronavirus; the nature, extent and success of the forbearance, payment deferrals, modifications and other loss mitigation options we provide to borrowers affected by the pandemic; accounting elections and estimates relating to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; borrower and renter behavior in response to the pandemic and its economic impact; the extent to which any future outbreaks or increases in new COVID-19 cases affect economic growth; and the pace and extent to which borrowers, renters and counterparties who continue to be negatively impacted by the pandemic recover;

•the impact of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement and the enterprise regulatory capital framework, as well as future legislative and regulatory requirements or changes, governmental initiatives, or executive orders affecting us, such as the enactment of housing finance reform legislation, including changes that limit our business activities or our footprint or impose new mandates on us;

•actions by FHFA, Treasury, HUD, the CFPB, the SEC or other regulators, Congress, the Executive Branch, or state or local governments that affect our business;

•changes in the structure and regulation of the financial services industry;

•the potential impact of a change in the corporate income tax rate, which we expect would affect our net income in the quarter of enactment as a result of a change in our measurement of our deferred tax assets and our net income in subsequent quarters as a result of the change in our effective federal income tax rate;

•the timing and level of, as well as regional variation in, home price changes;

•future interest rates and credit spreads;

•developments that may be difficult to predict, including: market conditions that result in changes in our net amortization income from our guaranty book of business, fluctuations in the estimated fair value of our derivatives and other financial instruments that we mark to market through our earnings; and developments that affect our loss reserves, such as changes in interest rates, home prices or accounting standards, or events such as natural or other disasters, the emergence of widespread health emergencies or pandemics, or other disruptive or catastrophic events;


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						66


			MD&A \| Forward-Looking Statements

•uncertainties relating to the discontinuance of LIBOR, or other market changes that could impact the loans we own or guarantee or our MBS;

•disruptions or instability in the housing and credit markets;

•the size and our share of the U.S. mortgage market and the factors that affect them, including population growth and household formation;

•growth, deterioration and the overall health and stability of the U.S. economy, including U.S. GDP, unemployment rates, personal income, inflation and other indicators thereof;

•changes in fiscal or monetary policy;

•our and our competitors’ future guaranty fee pricing and the impact of that pricing on our competitive environment and guaranty fee revenues;

•the volume of mortgage originations;

•the size, composition, quality and performance of our guaranty book of business and retained mortgage portfolio;

•the competitive environment in which we operate, including the impact of legislative, regulatory or other developments on levels of competition in our industry and other factors affecting our market share;

•how long loans in our guaranty book of business remain outstanding;

•the effectiveness of our business resiliency plans and systems;

•changes in the demand for Fannie Mae MBS, in general or from one or more major groups of investors;

•our conservatorship, including any changes to or termination (by receivership or otherwise) of the conservatorship and its effect on our business;

•the investment by Treasury, including the impact of past or potential future changes to the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, and their effect on our business, including restrictions imposed on us by the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, the senior preferred stock, and the warrant, as well as the extent that these or other restrictions on our business and activities are applied to us through other mechanisms even if we cease to be subject to these agreements and instruments;

•adverse effects from activities we undertake to support the mortgage market and help borrowers, renters, lenders and servicers;

•actions we may be required to take by FHFA, in its role as our conservator or as our regulator, such as actions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in the type of business we do, or actions relating to UMBS or our resecuritization of Freddie Mac-issued securities;

•limitations on our business imposed by FHFA, in its role as our conservator or as our regulator;

•our current and future objectives and activities in support of those objectives, including actions we may take to reach additional underserved borrowers or address barriers to sustainable housing opportunities and advance equity in housing finance;

•the possibility that changes in leadership at FHFA or the Administration may result in changes that affect our company or our business;

•our reliance on Common Securitization Solutions, LLC (“CSS”), a limited liability company we own jointly with Freddie Mac, and the common securitization platform CSS operates for a majority of our single-family securitization activities; provisions in the CSS limited liability company agreement that permit FHFA to add members to the CSS Board of Managers, limiting the ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to control decisions of the Board; and changes FHFA may require in our relationship with or in our support of CSS;

•a decrease in our credit ratings;

•limitations on our ability to access the debt capital markets;

•constraints on our entry into new credit risk transfer transactions;

•significant changes in forbearance, modification and foreclosure activity;

•the volume and pace of future nonperforming and reperforming loan sales and their impact on our results and serious delinquency rates;

•changes in borrower behavior;


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						67


			MD&A \| Forward-Looking Statements

•actions we may take to mitigate losses, and the effectiveness of our loss mitigation strategies, management of our REO inventory and pursuit of contractual remedies;

•defaults by one or more institutional counterparties;

•resolution or settlement agreements we may enter into with our counterparties;

•our need to rely on third parties to fully achieve some of our corporate objectives;

•our reliance on mortgage servicers;

•changes in GAAP, guidance by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and changes to our accounting policies;

•changes in the fair value of our assets and liabilities;

•the stability and adequacy of the systems and infrastructure that impact our operations, including ours and those of CSS, our other counterparties and other third parties;

•the impact of interdependence between the single-family mortgage securitization programs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in connection with UMBS;

•operational control weaknesses;

•our reliance on models and future updates we make to our models, including the assumptions used by these models;

•domestic and global political risks and uncertainties, including the impact of the Russian war in Ukraine and the potential expansion of military hostilities;

•natural disasters, environmental disasters, terrorist attacks, widespread health emergencies or pandemics, infrastructure failures, or other disruptive or catastrophic events;

•severe weather events, fires, floods or other climate change events or impacts, including those for which we may be uninsured or under-insured or that may affect our counterparties, and other risks resulting from climate change and efforts to address climate change and related risks;

•cyber attacks or other information security breaches or threats; and

•the other factors described in “Risk Factors” in this report and in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Readers are cautioned not to unduly rely on the forward-looking statements we make and to place these forward-looking statements into proper context by carefully considering the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K and in this report. These forward-looking statements are representative only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under the federal securities laws.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						68


			Financial Statements \| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Item 1. Financial Statements

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — (Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)


	As of
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021

ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	41,639		$	42,448
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (includes $28,346 and $59,203, respectively, related to consolidated trusts)		34,303			66,183
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (includes $13,391 and $13,533, respectively, related to consolidated trusts)		15,391			20,743
Investments in securities:
Trading, at fair value (includes $3,824 and $4,224, respectively, pledged as collateral)		64,811			88,206
Available-for-sale, at fair value (with an amortized cost of $764 and $827, respectively)		765			837
Total investments in securities		65,576			89,043
Mortgage loans:
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value		4,579			5,134
Loans held for investment, at amortized cost:
Of Fannie Mae		58,241			61,025
Of consolidated trusts		4,035,180			3,907,712
Total loans held for investment (includes $4,071 and $4,964, respectively, at fair value)		4,093,421			3,968,737
Allowance for loan losses		(6,069)			(5,629)
Total loans held for investment, net of allowance		4,087,352			3,963,108
Total mortgage loans		4,091,931			3,968,242
Advances to lenders		4,622			8,414
Deferred tax assets, net		12,402			12,715
Accrued interest receivable, net (includes $8,968 and $8,878 related to consolidated trusts and net of allowance of $89 and $140, respectively)		9,565			9,264
Acquired property, net		1,485			1,259
Other assets		12,053			10,855
Total assets		$	4,288,967		$	4,229,166
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accrued interest payable (includes $8,777 and $8,517, respectively, related to consolidated trusts)		$	9,355		$	9,186
Debt:
Of Fannie Mae (includes $1,866 and $2,381, respectively, at fair value)		144,455			200,892
Of consolidated trusts (includes $18,418 and $21,735, respectively, at fair value)		4,064,192			3,957,299
Other liabilities (includes $1,870 and $1,245, respectively, related to consolidated trusts)		14,558			14,432
Total liabilities		4,232,560			4,181,809
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)		—			—
Fannie Mae stockholders’ equity:
Senior preferred stock (liquidation preference of $173,257 and $163,672, respectively)		120,836			120,836
Preferred stock, 700,000,000 shares are authorized—555,374,922 shares issued and outstanding		19,130			19,130
Common stock, no par value, no maximum authorization—1,308,762,703 shares issued and 1,158,087,567 shares outstanding		687			687
Accumulated deficit		(76,873)			(85,934)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		27			38
Treasury stock, at cost, 150,675,136 shares		(7,400)			(7,400)
Total stockholders’ equity (See Note 1: Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock for information on the related dividend obligation and liquidation preference)		56,407			47,357
Total liabilities and equity		$	4,288,967		$	4,229,166

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						69


			Financial Statements \| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income — (Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts)


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,

	2022		2021		2022		2021
Interest income:
Trading securities	$	309	$	122	$	465	$	262
Available-for-sale securities	9		18		19		37
Mortgage loans	29,082		24,932		56,224		48,285
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	28		4		34		12
Other	27		31		53		73
Total interest income	29,455		25,107		56,795		48,669
Interest expense:
Short-term debt	(5)		(1)		(6)		(4)
Long-term debt	(21,642)		(16,820)		(41,582)		(33,637)
Total interest expense	(21,647)		(16,821)		(41,588)		(33,641)
Net interest income	7,808		8,286		15,207		15,028
Benefit (provision) for credit losses	(218)		2,588		(458)		3,353
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for credit losses	7,590		10,874		14,749		18,381
Investment gains (losses), net	(49)		646		(151)		691
Fair value gains (losses), net	529		(446)		1,009		338
Fee and other income	81		103		164		190
Non-interest income	561		303		1,022		1,219
Administrative expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits	(398)		(365)		(805)		(752)
Professional services	(198)		(184)		(407)		(398)

Other administrative expenses	(199)		(197)		(391)		(344)
Total administrative expenses	(795)		(746)		(1,603)		(1,494)
Foreclosed property income (expense)	(33)		(41)		6		(36)
TCCA fees	(841)		(758)		(1,665)		(1,489)
Credit enhancement expense	(332)		(274)		(610)		(558)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries	(47)		(44)		13		(75)
Other expenses, net	(228)		(280)		(464)		(599)
Total expenses	(2,276)		(2,143)		(4,323)		(4,251)
Income before federal income taxes	5,875		9,034		11,448		15,349
Provision for federal income taxes	(1,222)		(1,882)		(2,387)		(3,204)
Net income	4,653		7,152		9,061		12,145
Other comprehensive loss:
Changes in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments and taxes	(2)		(31)		(7)		(54)
Other, net of taxes	(2)		(1)		(4)		(5)
Total other comprehensive loss	(4)		(32)		(11)		(59)
Total comprehensive income	$	4,649	$	7,120	$	9,050	$	12,086
Net income	$	4,653	$	7,152	$	9,061	$	12,145
Dividends distributed or amounts attributable to senior preferred stock	(4,649)		(7,120)		(9,050)		(12,086)
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	4	$	32	$	11	$	59
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.00	$	0.01	$	0.00	$	0.01
Diluted	0.00		0.01		0.00		0.01
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic	5,867		5,867		5,867		5,867
Diluted	5,893		5,893		5,893		5,893

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						70


			Financial Statements \| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — (Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022			2021
Net cash provided by operating activities		$	24,163		$	40,039
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:




Purchases of loans held for investment		(166,414)			(395,301)
Proceeds from repayments of loans acquired as held-for-investment of Fannie Mae		4,588			5,840
Proceeds from sales of loans acquired held-for-investment of Fannie Mae		4,122			7,435
Proceeds from repayments and sales of loans acquired as held for investment of consolidated trusts		297,790			603,947
Advances to lenders		(114,263)			(212,678)
Proceeds from disposition of acquired property and preforeclosure sales		1,438			2,157
Net change in federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		5,352			(15,688)
Other, net		(1,248)			1,911
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		31,365			(2,377)
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt of Fannie Mae		167,585			101,875
Payments to redeem debt of Fannie Mae		(221,707)			(139,184)
Proceeds from issuance of debt of consolidated trusts		308,293			650,713
Payments to redeem debt of consolidated trusts		(343,855)			(641,462)


Other, net		1,467			72
Net cash used in financing activities		(88,217)			(27,986)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents		(32,689)			9,676
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		108,631			115,623
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	75,942		$	125,299
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		$	49,255		$	53,676
Income taxes		1,900			2,750

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						71


			Financial Statements \| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in

Equity — (Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in millions)


	Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares Outstanding			Senior Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock		Total Equity
	Senior Preferred	Preferred	Common
Balance as of March 31, 2022	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(81,526)	$	31	$	(7,400)	$	51,758

Comprehensive income:
Net income	—	—	—	—		—		—		4,653		—		—		4,653
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:
Changes in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities (net of taxes of $2)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(6)		—		(6)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of taxes of $1)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		4		—		4
Other (net of taxes of $1)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(2)		—		(2)
Total comprehensive income																4,649
Balance as of June 30, 2022	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(76,873)	$	27	$	(7,400)	$	56,407


	Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares Outstanding			Senior Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock		Total Equity
	Senior Preferred	Preferred	Common
Balance as of December 31, 2021	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(85,934)	$	38	$	(7,400)	$	47,357

Comprehensive income:
Net income	—	—	—	—		—		—		9,061		—		—		9,061
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:
Changes in net unrealized gains on available- for-sale securities (net of taxes of $4)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(15)		—		(15)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of taxes of $2)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		8		—		8
Other (net of taxes of $1)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(4)		—		(4)
Total comprehensive income																9,050
Balance as of June 30, 2022	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(76,873)	$	27	$	(7,400)	$	56,407

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						72


			Financial Statements \| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in

Equity — (Unaudited)

(Dollars and shares in millions)


	Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares Outstanding			Senior Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock		Total Equity
	Senior Preferred	Preferred	Common
Balance as of March 31, 2021	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(103,117)	$	89	$	(7,400)	$	30,225

Comprehensive income:
Net income	—	—	—	—		—		—		7,152		—		—		7,152
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:
Changes in net unrealized gains on available- for-sale securities (net of taxes of $1)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		2		—		2
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of taxes of $9)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(33)		—		(33)
Other (net of taxes of $1)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(1)		—		(1)
Total comprehensive income																7,120
Balance as of June 30, 2021	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(95,965)	$	57	$	(7,400)	$	37,345


	Fannie Mae Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares Outstanding			Senior Preferred Stock		Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock		Total Equity
	Senior Preferred	Preferred	Common
Balance as of December 31, 2020	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(108,110)	$	116	$	(7,400)	$	25,259

Comprehensive income:
Net income	—	—	—	—		—		—		12,145		—		—		12,145
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect:
Changes in net unrealized gains on available- for-sale securities (net of taxes of $1)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(4)		—		(4)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of taxes of $13)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(50)		—		(50)
Other (net of taxes of $2)	—	—	—	—		—		—		—		(5)		—		(5)
Total comprehensive income																12,086
Balance as of June 30, 2021	1	556	1,158	$	120,836	$	19,130	$	687	$	(95,965)	$	57	$	(7,400)	$	37,345

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						73


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

FANNIE MAE

(In conservatorship)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fannie Mae is a leading source of financing for mortgages in the United States. We are a shareholder-owned corporation organized as a government-sponsored entity (“GSE”) and existing under the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act (the “Charter Act” or our “charter”). Our charter is an act of Congress, and we have a purpose under that charter to provide liquidity and stability to the residential mortgage market and to promote access to mortgage credit. Our regulators include the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”). The U.S. government does not guarantee our securities or other obligations.

We have been under conservatorship, with FHFA acting as conservator, since September 6, 2008. See below and “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”) for additional information on our conservatorship and the impact of U.S. government support of our business.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and related notes should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the SEC’s instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as the accounts of other entities in which we have a controlling financial interest. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 may not necessarily be indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2022.

Use of Estimates

Preparing condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of our condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as our reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management has made significant estimates in a variety of areas including, but not limited to, the allowance for loan losses. Actual results could be different from these estimates.

Conservatorship

On September 7, 2008, the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of FHFA announced several actions taken by Treasury and FHFA regarding Fannie Mae, which included: (1) placing us in conservatorship, with FHFA acting as our conservator, and (2) the execution of a senior preferred stock purchase agreement by our conservator, on our behalf, and Treasury, pursuant to which we issued to Treasury both senior preferred stock and a warrant to purchase common stock.

Under the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended, including by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (together, the “GSE Act”), the conservator immediately succeeded to (1) all rights, titles, powers and privileges of Fannie Mae, and of any stockholder, officer or director of Fannie Mae with respect to Fannie Mae and its assets, and (2) title to the books, records and assets of any other legal custodian of Fannie Mae. The conservator subsequently issued an order that provided for our Board of Directors to exercise specified functions and authorities. The conservator also provided instructions regarding matters for which conservator


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						74


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

decision or notification is required. The conservator retains the authority to amend or withdraw its order and instructions at any time.

The conservatorship has no specified termination date and there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding our future, including how long we will continue to exist in our current form, the extent of our role in the market, the level of government support of our business, how long we will be in conservatorship, what form we will have and what ownership interest, if any, our current common and preferred stockholders will hold in us after the conservatorship is terminated and whether we will continue to exist following conservatorship. Under the GSE Act, the Director of FHFA must place us into receivership if they make a written determination that our assets are less than our obligations or if we have not been paying our debts, in either case, for a period of 60 days. In addition, the Director of FHFA may place us into receivership at the Director’s discretion at any time for other reasons set forth in the GSE Act, including if we are critically undercapitalized or if we are undercapitalized and have no reasonable prospect of becoming adequately capitalized. Should we be placed into receivership, different assumptions would be required to determine the carrying value of our assets, which would lead to substantially different financial results. Treasury has made a commitment under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under certain circumstances if we have a net worth deficit. We are not aware of any plans of FHFA (1) to fundamentally change our business model, or (2) to reduce the aggregate amount available to or held by the company under our equity structure, which includes the senior preferred stock purchase agreement.

Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock

We discuss more fully our senior preferred stock and the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, as amended, including Treasury’s funding commitment, in “Note 11, Equity” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Treasury has made a commitment under the senior preferred stock purchase agreement to provide funding to us under certain circumstances if we have a net worth deficit. Pursuant to the senior preferred stock purchase agreement, we have received a total of $119.8 billion from Treasury as of June 30, 2022, and the amount of remaining funding available to us under the agreement is $113.9 billion. We have not received any funding from Treasury under this commitment since the first quarter of 2018. We had positive net worth of $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022.

The dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock permit us to retain increases in our net worth until our net worth exceeds the amount of adjusted total capital necessary for us to meet the capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital framework established by FHFA.

Related Parties

Because Treasury holds a warrant to purchase shares of Fannie Mae common stock equal to 79.9% of the total number of shares of Fannie Mae common stock, we and Treasury are deemed related parties.

FHFA’s control of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has caused Fannie Mae, FHFA and Freddie Mac to be deemed related parties. Additionally, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac jointly own Common Securitization Solutions, LLC (“CSS”), a limited liability company created to operate a common securitization platform; as a result, CSS is deemed a related party. As a part of our joint ownership, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and CSS are parties to a limited liability company agreement that sets forth the overall framework for the joint venture, including Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s rights and responsibilities as members of CSS. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and CSS are also parties to a customer services agreement that sets forth the terms under which CSS provides mortgage securitization services to us and Freddie Mac, including the operation of the common securitization platform, as well as an administrative services agreement. CSS operates as a separate company from us and Freddie Mac, with all funding and limited administrative support services and other resources provided to it by us and Freddie Mac.

In the ordinary course of business, Fannie Mae may purchase and sell securities issued by Treasury and Freddie Mac. These transactions occur on the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties. Some of the structured securities we issue are backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each have agreed to indemnify the other party for losses caused by: its failure to meet its payment or other specified obligations under the trust agreements pursuant to which the underlying resecuritized securities were issued; its failure to meet its obligations under the customer services agreement; its violations of laws; or with respect to material misstatements or omissions in offering documents, ongoing disclosures and related materials


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						75


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

relating to the underlying resecuritized securities. Additionally, we make regular income tax payments to and receive tax refunds from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), a bureau of Treasury.

Transactions with Treasury

Our administrative expenses were reduced by $3 million and $5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 respectively, and $7 million and $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, due to reimbursements from Treasury and Freddie Mac for expenses incurred as program administrator for Treasury’s Home Affordable Modification Program and other initiatives under Treasury’s Making Home Affordable Program.

In December 2011, Congress enacted the Temporary Payroll Cut Continuation Act of 2011 (“TCCA”) which, among other provisions, required that we increase our single-family guaranty fees by at least 10 basis points and remit this increase to Treasury. To meet our obligations under the TCCA and at the direction of FHFA, we increased the guaranty fee on all single-family residential mortgages delivered to us by 10 basis points effective April 1, 2012. The resulting fee revenue and expense are recorded in “Interest income: Mortgage loans” and “TCCA fees,” respectively, in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

In November 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was enacted, which extended to October 1, 2032 our obligation under the TCCA to collect 10 basis points in guaranty fees on single-family residential mortgages delivered to us and pay the associated revenue to Treasury. In January 2022, FHFA advised us to continue to pay these TCCA fees to Treasury with respect to all single-family loans acquired by us before October 1, 2032, and to continue to remit these amounts to Treasury on and after October 1, 2032 with respect to loans we acquired before this date until those loans are paid off or otherwise liquidated.

We recognized $841 million and $758 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 respectively, and $1.7 billion and $1.5 billion in TCCA fees during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, of which $841 million had not been remitted to Treasury as of June 30, 2022.

The GSE Act requires us to set aside certain funding obligations, a portion of which is attributable to Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund. These funding obligations, recognized in “Other expenses, net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, are measured as the product of 4.2 basis points and the unpaid principal balance of our total new business purchases for the respective period, with 35% of this amount payable to Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund. We recognized a total of $28 million and $57 million in “Other expenses, net” for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 respectively, and $66 million and $119 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, in connection with Treasury’s Capital Magnet Fund, of which $66 million has not been remitted as of June 30, 2022.

Transactions with FHFA

The GSE Act authorizes FHFA to establish an annual assessment for regulated entities, including Fannie Mae, which is payable on a semi-annual basis (April and October), for FHFA’s costs and expenses, as well as to maintain FHFA’s working capital. We recognized FHFA assessment fees, which are recorded in “Administrative expenses” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of $31 million and $35 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $63 million and $72 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Transactions with CSS and Freddie Mac

We contributed capital to CSS, the company we jointly own with Freddie Mac, of $16 million and $18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $38 million and $45 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is presented for basic and diluted EPS. We compute basic EPS by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. However, as a result of our conservatorship status and the terms of the senior preferred stock, no amounts would be available to distribute as dividends to common or preferred stockholders (other than to Treasury as the holder of the senior preferred stock). Net income attributable to common stockholders excludes amounts attributable to the senior preferred stock. Weighted average common shares include 4.7 billion shares for the periods ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 that would have been issued upon the full exercise of the warrant issued to Treasury from the date the warrant was issued through June 30, 2022 and 2021.

The calculation of diluted EPS includes all the components of basic earnings per share, plus the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents such as convertible securities and stock options. Weighted average shares outstanding is


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						76


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, our diluted EPS weighted-average shares outstanding includes $26 million shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible preferred stock.

New Accounting Guidance

Adoption of ASU 2022-02

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2022-02, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures (“ASU 2022-02”) in March 2022. The amendments in ASU 2022-02 eliminate the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) by creditors while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Specifically, rather than applying the recognition and measurement guidance for TDRs, an entity would apply the loan refinancing and restructuring guidance to determine whether a modification or other form of restructuring results in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan.

Additionally, the amendments in this ASU require that an entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and net investments in leases in the existing vintage disclosures.

The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, for creditors that have adopted the amendments in Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period and such election may be made individually to adopt the guidance related to TDRs, including related disclosures, and the presentation of gross write-offs in the vintage disclosure. ASU 2022-02 requires prospective transition for the disclosures related to loan restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty and the presentation of gross write-offs in the vintage disclosures. The guidance related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs may be adopted on a prospective or modified retrospective transition method.

We elected to early adopt the guidance related to the elimination of the recognition and measurement of TDRs and the enhancement of disclosures for loan restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as of January 1, 2022, using the prospective transition method. As of our adoption date, all restructurings, including restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, are evaluated to determine whether they result in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. Loan restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are generally accounted for as a continuation of the existing loan as the terms of the restructured loans are typically not at market rates. At adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2022, there was no material impact on our financial statements.

When a single-family loan is restructured under ASU 2022-02, we continue to measure impairment on the loan using a discounted cash flow approach that utilizes a prepayment-adjusted discount rate that is based on the loan’s restructured terms. Under the TDR accounting model, we used the discount rate that was in effect prior to the restructuring to measure impairment. Using the interest rate that was in effect prior to the restructuring resulted in the recognition, in the allowance for loan losses, of the economic concession that we granted to borrowers as part of the loan restructuring. Using a post-restructuring interest rate does not result in the recognition of an economic concession in the allowance for loan losses.

As we have elected a prospective transition, the economic concession on a loan that was previously restructured and accounted for as a TDR will continue to be measured in our allowance for loan losses using the discount rate that was in effect prior to the restructuring and the economic concession may increase or decrease as we update our cash flow assumptions related to the loan’s expected life. Further, the component of the allowance for loan losses representing economic concessions will decrease as the borrower makes payments in accordance with the restructured terms of the mortgage loan and as the loan is sold, liquidated, or subsequently restructured.

In general, the accounting for restructurings made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty upon adoption of the ASU is consistent with the accounting that we applied to troubled debt restructurings under section 4013 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, which provided temporary relief from the accounting and reporting requirements for certain troubled debt restructurings related to COVID-19 beginning March 2020 through January 1, 2022.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						77


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

We plan to adopt the disclosure guidance related to the presentation of gross write-offs by year of origination in our vintage disclosures upon the effective date of ASU 2022-02, January 1, 2023. We do not expect the adoption of the guidance requiring gross write-offs by year of origination in our vintage disclosures to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method

On March 28, 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-01, Fair Value Hedging - Portfolio Layer Method, which clarifies the guidance on fair value hedge accounting of interest rate risk portfolios of financial assets. The ASU expands the scope of the current last-of-layer method to allow entities to apply this method, renamed the portfolio layer method, to non-prepayable financial assets and to designate multiple hedge relationships within a single closed portfolio of financial assets. Additionally, the ASU clarifies that basis adjustments related to existing portfolio layer hedge relationships should not be considered when measuring credit losses on the financial assets included in the closed portfolio. Further, the ASU clarifies that any reversal of fair value hedge basis adjustments associated with an actual breach should be recognized in interest income immediately.

The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those years. We plan to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2023. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						78


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets

2. Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets

We have interests in various entities that are considered to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The primary types of entities are securitization and resecuritization trusts, limited partnerships and special purpose vehicles (“SPVs”). These interests include investments in securities issued by VIEs, such as Fannie Mae MBS created pursuant to our securitization transactions and our guaranty to the entity. We consolidate the substantial majority of our single-class securitization trusts because our role as guarantor and master servicer provides us with the power to direct matters (primarily the servicing of mortgage loans) that impact the credit risk to which we are exposed. In contrast, we do not consolidate single-class securitization trusts when other organizations have the power to direct these activities unless we have the unilateral ability to dissolve the trust. We also do not consolidate our resecuritization trusts unless we have the unilateral ability to dissolve the trust. Historically, the vast majority of underlying assets of our resecuritization trusts were limited to Fannie Mae securities that were collateralized by mortgage loans held in consolidated trusts. However, with our issuance of uniform mortgage-backed securities (“UMBS®”), we include securities issued by Freddie Mac in some of our resecuritization trusts. The mortgage loans that serve as collateral for Freddie Mac-issued securities are not held in trusts that are consolidated by Fannie Mae.

Unconsolidated VIEs

We do not consolidate VIEs when we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Our unconsolidated VIEs include securitization and resecuritization trusts, limited partnerships, and certain SPVs designed to transfer credit risk. The following table displays the carrying amount and classification of our assets and liabilities that relate to our involvement with unconsolidated securitization and resecuritization trusts.


	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021

	(Dollars in millions)
Assets and liabilities recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets related to unconsolidated mortgage-backed trusts:
Assets:
Trading securities:
Fannie Mae	$	800	$	984
Non-Fannie Mae	2,619		3,030
Total trading securities	3,419		4,014
Available-for-sale securities:
Fannie Mae	458		495
Non-Fannie Mae	174		200
Total available-for-sale securities	632		695
Other assets	33		35
Other liabilities	(38)		(41)
Net carrying amount	$	4,046	$	4,703

Our maximum exposure to loss generally represents the greater of our carrying value in the entity or the unpaid principal balance of the assets covered by our guaranty. Our involvement in unconsolidated resecuritization trusts may give rise to additional exposure to loss depending on the type of resecuritization trust. Fannie Mae non-commingled resecuritization trusts are backed entirely by Fannie Mae MBS. These non-commingled single-class and multi-class resecuritization trusts are not consolidated and do not give rise to any additional exposure to loss as we already consolidate the underlying collateral.

Fannie Mae commingled resecuritization trusts are backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac securities. The guaranty that we provide to these commingled resecuritization trusts may increase our exposure to loss to the extent that we are providing a guaranty for the timely payment and interest on the underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have not previously guaranteed. Our maximum exposure to loss for these unconsolidated trusts is measured by the amount of Freddie Mac securities that are held in these resecuritization trusts.

Our maximum exposure to loss related to unconsolidated securitization and resecuritization trusts, which includes but is not limited to our exposure to these Freddie Mac securities, was approximately $254 billion and $220 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The total assets of our unconsolidated securitization and


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						79


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets

resecuritization trusts were approximately $290 billion and $250 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

The maximum exposure to loss for our unconsolidated limited partnerships and similar legal entities, which consist of low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) investments, community investments and other entities, was $363 million and the related net carrying value was $356 million as of June 30, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, the maximum exposure to loss was $292 million and the related net carrying value was $288 million. The total assets of these limited partnership investments were $3.8 billion and $3.7 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

The maximum exposure to loss related to our involvement with unconsolidated SPVs that transfer credit risk represents the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest payable of obligations issued by the Connecticut Avenue Securities® (“CAS”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) SPVs. The maximum exposure to loss related to these unconsolidated SPVs was $16.7 billion and $10.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The total assets related to these unconsolidated SPVs were $16.7 billion and $10.4 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

The unpaid principal balance of our multifamily loan portfolio was $416.3 billion as of June 30, 2022. As our lending relationship does not provide us with a controlling financial interest in the borrower entity, we do not consolidate these borrowers regardless of their status as either a VIE or a voting interest entity. We have excluded these entities from our VIE disclosures. However, the disclosures we have provided in “Note 3, Mortgage Loans,” “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses” and “Note 6, Financial Guarantees” with respect to this population are consistent with the FASB’s stated objectives for the disclosures related to unconsolidated VIEs.

Transfers of Financial Assets

We issue Fannie Mae MBS through portfolio securitization transactions by transferring pools of mortgage loans or mortgage-related securities to one or more trusts or special purpose entities. We are considered to be the transferor when we transfer assets from our own retained mortgage portfolio in a portfolio securitization transaction. For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the unpaid principal balance of portfolio securitizations was $77.0 billion and $197.1 billion, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the unpaid principal balance of portfolio securitizations was $179.8 billion and $413.9 billion, respectively. The substantial majority of these portfolio securitization transactions generally do not qualify for sale treatment. Portfolio securitization trusts that do qualify for sale treatment primarily consist of loans that are guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government.

We retain interests from the transfer and sale of mortgage-related securities to unconsolidated single-class and multi-class portfolio securitization trusts. As of June 30, 2022, the unpaid principal balance of retained interests was $1.0 billion and its related fair value was $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2021, the unpaid principal balance of retained interests was $1.1 billion and its related fair value was $2.0 billion. For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the principal, interest and other fees received on retained interests was $108 million and $144 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, the principal, interest and other fees received on retained interests was $222 million and $287 million, respectively.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						80


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

3. Mortgage Loans

We own single-family mortgage loans, which are secured by four or fewer residential dwelling units, and multifamily mortgage loans, which are secured by five or more residential dwelling units. We classify these loans as either held for investment (“HFI”) or held for sale (“HFS”). For purposes of our notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements, we report the amortized cost of HFI loans for which we have not elected the fair value option at the unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums and discounts, hedge-related basis adjustments, other cost basis adjustments, and accrued interest receivable in these “Note 3, Mortgage Loans” disclosures. For purposes of our condensed consolidated balance sheets, we present accrued interest receivable, net separately from the amortized cost of our loans held for investment. We report the carrying value of HFS loans at the lower of cost or fair value and record valuation changes in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

For purposes of the single-family mortgage loan disclosures below, we display loans by class of financing receivable type. Financing receivable classes used for disclosure consist of: “20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate,” “15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate,” “Adjustable-rate,” and “Other.” The “Other” class primarily consists of reverse mortgage loans, interest-only loans, negative-amortizing loans and second liens.

The following table displays the carrying value of our mortgage loans and allowance for loan losses.


	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family	$	3,623,404	$	3,495,573
Multifamily	416,341		403,452
Total unpaid principal balance of mortgage loans	4,039,745		3,899,025
Cost basis and fair value adjustments, net	58,255		74,846
Allowance for loan losses for HFI loans	(6,069)		(5,629)
Total mortgage loans(1)	$	4,091,931	$	3,968,242

(1)Excludes $9.4 billion and $9.1 billion of accrued interest receivable, net of allowance as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

The following table displays information about our redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS and the sales of mortgage loans during the period.


		For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,

		2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family loans redesignated from HFI to HFS:
Amortized cost		$	3,192	$	6,305	$	4,373	$	9,417
Lower of cost or fair value adjustment at time of redesignation(1)		(209)		(146)		(222)		(200)
Allowance reversed at time of redesignation		155		824		218		1,185

Single-family loans sold:
Unpaid principal balance		$	4,310	$	7,317	$	4,310	$	7,525
Realized gains, net		71		653		71		655

(1)Consists of the write-off against the allowance at the time of redesignation.

The amortized cost of single-family mortgage loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process was $4.6 billion as of June 30, 2022 and $4.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. As a result of our various loss mitigation and foreclosure prevention efforts, we expect that a portion of the loans in the process of formal foreclosure proceedings will not ultimately foreclose.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						81


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

Aging Analysis

The following tables display an aging analysis of the total amortized cost of our HFI mortgage loans by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option.


	As of June 30, 2022
	30 - 59 Days Delinquent		60 - 89 Days Delinquent		Seriously Delinquent(1)		Total Delinquent		Current		Total		Loans 90 Days or More Delinquent and Accruing Interest		Nonaccrual Loans with No Allowance
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	23,117	$	5,016	$	23,501	$	51,634	$	3,045,736	$	3,097,370	$	15,579	$	4,635
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	1,863		263		990		3,116		520,848		523,964		805		122
Adjustable-rate	164		29		178		371		25,577		25,948		130		39
Other(2)	624		164		1,126		1,914		31,752		33,666		566		379
Total single-family	25,768		5,472		25,795		57,035		3,623,913		3,680,948		17,080		5,175
Multifamily(3)	174		N/A		1,392		1,566		416,287		417,853		28		77
Total	$	25,942	$	5,472	$	27,187	$	58,601	$	4,040,200	$	4,098,801	$	17,108	$	5,252


	As of December 31, 2021
	30 - 59 Days Delinquent		60 - 89 Days Delinquent		Seriously Delinquent(1)		Total Delinquent		Current		Total		Loans 90 Days or More Delinquent and Accruing Interest		Nonaccrual Loans with No Allowance
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	22,862	$	5,192	$	38,288	$	66,342	$	2,902,763	$	2,969,105	$	24,236	$	6,271
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	2,024		326		1,799		4,149		529,278		533,427		1,454		193
Adjustable-rate	161		36		374		571		25,771		26,342		287		63
Other(2)	786		204		1,942		2,932		35,013		37,945		1,008		545
Total single-family	25,833		5,758		42,403		73,994		3,492,825		3,566,819		26,985		7,072
Multifamily(3)	114		N/A		1,693		1,807		404,398		406,205		317		107
Total	$	25,947	$	5,758	$	44,096	$	75,801	$	3,897,223	$	3,973,024	$	27,302	$	7,179

(1)Single-family seriously delinquent loans are loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process. Multifamily seriously delinquent loans are loans that are 60 days or more past due.

(2)Reverse mortgage loans included in “Other” are not aged due to their nature and are included in the current column.

(3)Multifamily loans 60-89 days delinquent are included in the seriously delinquent column.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						82


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

Credit Quality Indicators

The following tables display the total amortized cost of our single-family HFI loans by class of financing receivable, year of origination and credit quality indicator, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. The estimated mark-to-market loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio is a primary factor we consider when estimating our allowance for loan losses for single-family loans. As LTV ratios increase, the borrower's equity in the home decreases, which may negatively affect the borrower's ability to refinance or to sell the property for an amount at or above the outstanding balance of the loan.


	As of June 30, 2022, by Year of Origination(1)
	2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:(2)
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate:
Less than or equal to 80%	$	190,136	$	937,515	$	856,222	$	157,885	$	75,387	$	695,506	$	2,912,651
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	47,716		84,022		5,527		1,037		606		1,262		140,170
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	36,786		5,414		1,270		375		102		273		44,220
Greater than 100%	1		11		9		11		13		284		329
Total 20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	274,639		1,026,962		863,028		159,308		76,108		697,325		3,097,370
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate:
Less than or equal to 80%	31,599		196,511		143,922		22,168		8,165		119,586		521,951
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	802		745		44		6		1		3		1,601
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	374		31		1		—		—		2		408
Greater than 100%	—		—		—		—		—		4		4
Total 15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	32,775		197,287		143,967		22,174		8,166		119,595		523,964
Adjustable-rate:
Less than or equal to 80%	1,920		6,755		2,009		894		1,001		12,698		25,277
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	310		207		7		1		2		3		530
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	125		15		1		—		—		—		141
Greater than 100%	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total adjustable-rate	2,355		6,977		2,017		895		1,003		12,701		25,948
Other:
Less than or equal to 80%	—		—		—		31		238		24,297		24,566
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	—		—		—		—		2		151		153
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	—		—		—		—		1		71		72
Greater than 100%	—		—		—		—		—		71		71
Total other	—		—		—		31		241		24,590		24,862
Total	$	309,769	$	1,231,226	$	1,009,012	$	182,408	$	85,518	$	854,211	$	3,672,144

Total for all classes by LTV ratio:(2)
Less than or equal to 80%	$	223,655	$	1,140,781	$	1,002,153	$	180,978	$	84,791	$	852,087	$	3,484,445
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	48,828		84,974		5,578		1,044		611		1,419		142,454
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	37,285		5,460		1,272		375		103		346		44,841
Greater than 100%	1		11		9		11		13		359		404
Total	$	309,769	$	1,231,226	$	1,009,012	$	182,408	$	85,518	$	854,211	$	3,672,144


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						83


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans


	As of December 31, 2021, by Year of Origination(1)
	2021		2020		2019		2018		2017		Prior		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:(2)
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate:
Less than or equal to 80%	$	798,830	$	881,290	$	177,909	$	87,825	$	111,059	$	666,327	$	2,723,240
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	129,340		39,689		2,689		1,056		622		1,687		175,083
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	66,667		2,278		544		229		57		460		70,235
Greater than 100%	21		12		9		16		22		467		547
Total 20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	994,858		923,269		181,151		89,126		111,760		668,941		2,969,105
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate:
Less than or equal to 80%	196,163		157,076		25,390		9,595		20,715		121,027		529,966
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	2,576		259		16		4		2		7		2,864
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	579		5		—		1		1		4		590
Greater than 100%	—		—		—		—		2		5		7
Total 15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	199,318		157,340		25,406		9,600		20,720		121,043		533,427
Adjustable-rate:
Less than or equal to 80%	6,166		2,235		1,065		1,236		2,524		12,501		25,727
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	438		25		7		4		2		3		479
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	135		1		—		—		—		—		136
Greater than 100%	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total adjustable-rate	6,739		2,261		1,072		1,240		2,526		12,504		26,342
Other:
Less than or equal to 80%	—		—		34		268		655		26,930		27,887
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	—		—		—		3		6		275		284
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	—		—		—		1		2		133		136
Greater than 100%	—		—		—		1		1		141		143
Total other	—		—		34		273		664		27,479		28,450
Total	$	1,200,915	$	1,082,870	$	207,663	$	100,239	$	135,670	$	829,967	$	3,557,324

Total for all classes by LTV ratio:(2)
Less than or equal to 80%	$	1,001,159	$	1,040,601	$	204,398	$	98,924	$	134,953	$	826,785	$	3,306,820
Greater than 80% and less than or equal to 90%	132,354		39,973		2,712		1,067		632		1,972		178,710
Greater than 90% and less than or equal to 100%	67,381		2,284		544		231		60		597		71,097
Greater than 100%	21		12		9		17		25		613		697
Total	$	1,200,915	$	1,082,870	$	207,663	$	100,239	$	135,670	$	829,967	$	3,557,324

(1)Excludes $8.8 billion and $9.5 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, of mortgage loans guaranteed or insured, in whole or in part, by the U.S. government or one of its agencies, which represents primarily reverse mortgages for which we do not calculate an estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio.

(2)The aggregate estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio is based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan divided by the estimated current value of the property as of the end of each reported period, which we calculate using an internal valuation model that estimates periodic changes in home value.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						84


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

The following tables display the total amortized cost of our multifamily HFI loans by year of origination and credit-risk rating, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. Property rental income and property valuations are key inputs to our internally assigned credit risk ratings.


	As of June 30, 2022, by Year of Origination
	2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Internally assigned credit risk rating:
Non-classified(1)	$	25,484	$	66,316	$	77,400	$	61,574	$	52,228	$	116,500	$	399,502
Classified(2)	—		134		911		2,676		1,966		12,664		18,351
Total	$	25,484	$	66,450	$	78,311	$	64,250	$	54,194	$	129,164	$	417,853


	As of December 31, 2021, by Year of Origination
	2021		2020		2019		2018		2017		Prior		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Internally assigned credit risk rating:
Non-classified(1)	$	58,986	$	79,602	$	64,278	$	55,552	$	44,037	$	87,549	$	390,004
Classified(2)	21		595		2,288		2,114		4,091		7,092		16,201
Total	$	59,007	$	80,197	$	66,566	$	57,666	$	48,128	$	94,641	$	406,205

(1)A loan categorized as “Non-classified” is current or adequately protected by the current financial strength and debt service capability of the borrower.

(2)Represents loans classified as “Substandard” or “Doubtful.” Loans classified as “Substandard” have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes the timely full repayment. “Doubtful” refers to a loan with a weakness that makes collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable based on existing conditions and values. We had loans with an amortized cost of $37 million classified as doubtful as of June 30, 2022 and loans with an amortized cost of less than $1 million classified as doubtful as of December 31, 2021.

Loss Mitigation Options for Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

As part of our loss mitigation activities, we may agree to modify the contractual terms of a loan to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. In addition to loan modifications, we also provide other loss mitigation options to assist borrowers who experience financial difficulties.

Below we provide disclosures relating to loan restructurings where borrowers were experiencing financial difficulty, including restructurings that resulted in an insignificant payment delay. The disclosures exclude loans classified as held for sale and those for which we have elected the fair value option.

Single-Family Loan Restructurings

We offer several types of restructurings to single-family borrowers that may result in a payment delay, interest rate reduction, term extension, or combination thereof. We do not typically offer principal forgiveness.

We offer the following types of restructurings to single-family borrowers that only result in a payment delay:

•a forbearance plan is a short-term loss mitigation option which grants a period of time (typically 3-month increments) during which the borrower’s monthly payment obligations are reduced or suspended. A forbearance plan does not impact our reporting of when a loan is considered past due, which remains based on the contractual terms of the loan. Borrowers may exit a forbearance plan by repaying all past due amounts to fully reinstate the loan, paying off the loan in full, or entering into another loss mitigation option, such as a repayment plan, a payment deferral, or a loan modification. The vast majority of forbearance plans offered since 2020 relate to a COVID-19-related financial hardship where we have authorized our servicers to offer a forbearance plan for up to 18 months for eligible borrowers;

•a repayment plan is a short-term loss mitigation option that allows borrowers a specific period of time to return the loan to current status by paying the regular monthly payment plus additional agreed-upon delinquent amounts (generally for a period up to 12 months and the monthly repayment plan amount must not exceed 150% of the contractual mortgage payment). A repayment plan does not impact our reporting of when a loan is considered past due, which remains based on the contractual terms of the loan. At the end of the repayment plan, the borrower resumes making the regular monthly payment; and


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						85


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

•a payment deferral is a loss mitigation option which defers the repayment of the delinquent principal and interest payments and other eligible default-related amounts that were advanced on behalf of the borrower by converting them into a non-interest-bearing balance due at the earlier of the payoff date, the maturity date, or sale or transfer of the property. The remaining mortgage terms, interest rate, payment schedule, and maturity date remain unchanged, and no trial period is required. The number of months of payments deferred varies based on the types of hardships the borrower is facing.

We also offer single-family borrowers loan modifications, which contractually change the terms of the loan. Our loan modification programs generally require completion of a trial period of three to four months where the borrower makes reduced monthly payments prior to receiving the modification. During the trial period, the mortgage loan is not contractually modified and continues to be reported as past due according to its contractual terms. The reduced payments that are made by the borrower during the trial period will result in a payment delay with respect to the original contractual terms of the loan. After successful completion of the trial period, and the borrower’s execution of a modification agreement, the mortgage loan is contractually modified.

Our loan modifications include the following concessions:

•capitalization of past due amounts, a form of payment delay, which capitalizes interest and other eligible default related amounts that were advanced on behalf of the borrower that are past due into the unpaid principal balance and

•a term extension, which typically extends the contractual maturity date of the loan to 40 years from the effective date of the modification.

In addition to these concessions, loan modifications may also include an interest rate reduction, which reduces the contractual interest rate of the loan, or a principal forbearance, which is another form of payment delay that includes forbearing repayment of a portion of the principal balance as a non-interest bearing amount that is due at the earlier of the payoff date, the maturity date, or sale or transfer of the property.

Multifamily Loan Restructurings

For multifamily borrowers, loan restructurings include short-term forbearance plans and loan modification programs, which primarily result in term extensions of up to one year with no change to the loan’s interest rate. In certain cases, we may make more significant modifications of terms for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, such as reducing the interest rate, converting to interest-only payments, extending the maturity for longer than one year, providing principal forbearance, or some combination of these terms.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						86


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

Restructurings for Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

The following table displays the amortized cost of HFI mortgage loans that were restructured during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, presented by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable.



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Payment Delay (Only)
	Forbearance Plan		Payment Deferral		Trial Modification and Repayment Plans		Payment Delay and Term Extension(1)		Payment Delay, Term Extension and Interest Rate Reduction(1)			Total	Percentage of Total by Financing Class(2)
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	11,213	$	5,203	$	3,815	$	769		$	4,671		$	25,671	1	%
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	571		287		154		—			—			1,012		*
Adjustable-rate	61		27		28		—			4			120		*
Other	231		121		144		46			148			690		2
Total single-family	12,076		5,638		4,141		815			4,823			27,493		1
Multifamily	23		—		—		—			11			34		*
Total(3)	$	12,099	$	5,638	$	4,141	$	815		$	4,834		$	27,527	1

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Payment Delay (Only)
	Forbearance Plan		Payment Deferral		Trial Modification and Repayment Plans		Payment Delay and Term Extension(1)		Payment Delay, Term Extension and Interest Rate Reduction(1)			Total	Percentage of Total by Financing Class(2)
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	14,428	$	11,518	$	6,064	$	1,831		$	9,165		$	43,006	1	%
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	735		653		253		1			1			1,643		*
Adjustable-rate	84		77		53		—			12			226		1
Other	319		304		232		139			374			1,368		4
Total single-family	15,566		12,552		6,602		1,971			9,552			46,243		1
Multifamily	237		—		—		—			11			248		*
Total(3)	$	15,803	$	12,552	$	6,602	$	1,971		$	9,563		$	46,491	1

* Represents less than 0.5% of total by financing class.

(1) Represents loans that received a contractual modification.

(2) Based on the amortized cost basis as of period end, divided by the period end amortized cost basis of the corresponding class of financing receivable.

(3) Excludes $269 million and $1.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively, for loans that paid off prior to period end. Also excludes loans that liquidated either through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a short sale. Loans may move from one category to another, as a result of the restructuring(s) they received during the period.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						87


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

Our estimate of future credit losses uses a lifetime methodology, derived from modeled loan performance based on the historical experience of loans with similar risk characteristics, adjusted to reflect current conditions, our current loss mitigation activities and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The credit loss model considers extensive historical loss experience, which would include the impact of the loss mitigation programs that we offer to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, and also includes the impact of projected loss severities as a result of a loan default. The manner in which these loss mitigation programs are factored into our loss estimates do not vary by portfolio segment.

The following tables summarize the financial impacts of loan modifications and payment deferrals made to single-family HFI loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, presented by class of financing receivable. We discuss the qualitative impacts of forbearance plans, repayment plans, and trial modifications earlier in this footnote. As a result, those loss mitigation options are excluded from the table below.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Weighted-Average Interest Rate Reduction		Weighted-Average Term Extension (in Months)	Average Amount Capitalized as a Result of a Payment Delay(1)

Loan by class of financing receivable(2):
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	1.45	%	180	$	22,997
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	1.88		51	18,394
Adjustable-rate	0.78		—	19,528
Other	1.81		183	22,666

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
	Weighted-Average Interest Rate Reduction		Weighted-Average Term Extension (in Months)	Average Amount Capitalized as a Result of a Payment Delay(1)
Loan by class of financing receivable(2):
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	1.52	%	179	$	23,372
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	2.69		61	20,361
Adjustable-rate	0.53		—	23,406
Other	1.87		185	24,310

(1) Represents the average amount of delinquency-related amounts that were capitalized as part of the loan balance. Amounts are in whole dollars.

(2) Excludes the financial effects of modifications for loans that were paid off or otherwise liquidated as of period end.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						88


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

The following table displays the amortized cost of HFI loans that received a completed modification or payment deferral on or after January 1, 2022, the date we adopted ASU 2022-02, through June 30, 2022 and that defaulted in the period presented. The substantial majority of loans that received a completed modification or a payment deferral during the second quarter of 2022 did not default during the period. For purposes of this disclosure, we define loans that had a payment default as single-family loans with completed modifications that are two or more months delinquent during the period; or multifamily loans with completed modifications that are one or more months delinquent during the period. For loans that receive a forbearance plan, repayment plan or trial modification, these loss mitigation options generally remain in default until the loan is no longer delinquent as a result of the payment of all past-due amounts or as a result of a loan modification or payment deferral. Therefore, forbearance plans, repayment plans and trial modifications are not included in default tables below.


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022(1)
		Payment Delay as a Result of a Payment Deferral (Only)		Payment Delay and Term Extension(1)			Payment Delay, Term Extension and Interest Rate Reduction(1)			Total
	(Dollars in Millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate		$	492		$	62		$	109		$	663
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate		21			1			—			22
Adjustable-rate		3			—			1			4
Other		14			5			9			28
Total single-family		530			68			119			717
Multifamily		—			—			—			—
Total loans that subsequently defaulted(2)		$	530		$	68		$	119		$	717

(1) The substantial majority of loans that subsequently defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 2022, defaulted during the second quarter; therefore we are not separately presenting a table for the three months ended June 30, 2022.

(2) Represents amortized cost as of period end. Excludes loans that liquidated either through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a short sale.

The following table displays an aging analysis of HFI mortgage loans that were restructured on or after January 1, 2022, the date we adopted ASU 2022-02, through June 30, 2022, presented by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. The substantial majority of loans that received a completed modification or a payment deferral during the second quarter of 2022 were not delinquent.


	As of June 30, 2022
	30-59 Days Delinquent		60-89 Days Delinquent(1)		Seriously Delinquent		Total Delinquent		Current		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	2,351	$	1,680	$	15,203	$	19,234	$	13,130	$	32,364
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	112		87		649		848		507		1,355
Adjustable-rate	14		8		103		125		71		196
Other	65		44		440		549		504		1,053
Total single-family loans modified	2,542		1,819		16,395		20,756		14,212		34,968
Multifamily	—		—		237		237		11		248
Total loans restructured(2)	$	2,542	$	1,819	$	16,632	$	20,993	$	14,223	$	35,216

(1) Multifamily loans 60-89 days delinquent are included in the seriously delinquent column.

(2) Represents the amortized cost basis as of period end.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						89


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

Troubled Debt Restructuring Disclosures Prior to Our Adoption of ASU 2022-02

Prior to our adoption of ASU 2022-02, we accounted for a modification to the contractual terms of a loan that resulted in granting a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties as a TDR. In addition to formal loan modifications, we accounted for informal restructurings as a TDR if we deferred more than three missed payments to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. We also classified bankruptcy relief provided to certain borrowers as TDRs. However, our TDR accounting described herein was suspended for most of our loss mitigation activities through our election to account for certain eligible loss mitigation activities occurring between March 2020 and January 1, 2022 under the COVID-19 relief granted pursuant to the CARES Act and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021. On January 1, 2022, we adopted ASU 2022-02, which eliminated TDR accounting prospectively for all restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2022. Loans that were restructured in a TDR prior to the adoption of ASU 2022-02 will continue to be accounted for under the historical TDR accounting until the loan is paid off, liquidated or subsequently modified. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information on the COVID-19 relief from TDR accounting and disclosure requirements, and “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in this report for more information on our adoption of ASU 2022-02.

The substantial majority of the loan modifications accounted for as TDRs resulted from a payment delay, term extension, interest rate reduction or a combination thereof. The average term extension of a single-family modified loan was 145 months and the average interest rate reduction was 0.61 percentage points for the three months ended June 30, 2021. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the average term extension of a single-family modified loan was 142 months and the average interest rate reduction was 0.57 percentage points.

The following table displays the number of loans and amortized cost of loans classified as a TDR during the period.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
	Number of Loans	Amortized Cost
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	2,907	$	458
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	308	26
Adjustable-rate	37	6
Other	174	17
Total single-family	3,426	507
Multifamily	—	—
Total TDRs	3,426	$	507


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
	Number of Loans	Amortized Cost
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	5,896	$	929
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	677	54
Adjustable-rate	78	12
Other	328	35
Total single-family	6,979	1,030
Multifamily	—	—
Total TDRs	6,979	$	1,030


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						90


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

For loans that defaulted in the periods presented and that were classified as a TDR in the twelve months prior to the default, the following table displays the number of loans and the amortized cost of these loans at the time of payment default. For purposes of this disclosure, we defined loans that had a payment default as: single-family and multifamily loans with completed modifications that liquidated during the period, either through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a short sale; single-family loans with completed modifications that are two or more months delinquent during the period; or multifamily loans with completed modifications that are one or more months delinquent during the period.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
	Number of Loans	Amortized Cost
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	1,562	$	262
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	103	8
Adjustable-rate	6	1
Other	211	38
Total single-family	1,882	309
Multifamily	—	—
Total TDRs that subsequently defaulted	1,882	$	309


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
	Number of Loans	Amortized Cost
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	3,972	$	675
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	197	14
Adjustable-rate	15	3
Other	493	91
Total single-family	4,677	783
Multifamily	—	—
Total TDRs that subsequently defaulted	4,677	$	783

Nonaccrual Loans

For loans negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to recognize interest income for up to six months of delinquency provided that the loan was either current as of March 1, 2020 or originated after March 1, 2020. For single-family loans, we continue to accrue interest income beyond six months of delinquency provided that the collection of principal and interest continues to be reasonably assured. Multifamily loans that are in a forbearance arrangement are placed on nonaccrual status when the borrower is six months past due unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. For single-family and multifamily loans in a forbearance arrangement that are placed on nonaccrual status, cash payments for interest are applied as a reduction of accrued interest receivable until the receivable has been reduced to zero, and then recognized as interest income. For loans that have been negatively impacted by COVID-19, we establish a valuation allowance for expected credit losses on the accrued interest receivable balance applying the process that we have established for both single-family and multifamily loans. The credit expense related to this valuation allowance is classified as a component of the provision for credit losses. Accrued interest receivable is written off when the amount is deemed to be uncollectible. Loans that are in active forbearance plans are not evaluated for write-off. For loans not subject to the COVID-19-related guidance, we have elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable balances as we have a nonaccrual policy to ensure the timely reversal of unpaid accrued interest. See “Note 4, Allowance for Loan Losses” for additional information about our current-period provision for loan losses.

For loans not subject to the COVID-19-related nonaccrual policy we discontinue accruing interest when we believe collectability of principal and interest is not reasonably assured, which for a single-family loan we have determined,


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						91


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

based on our historical experience, to be when the loan becomes two months or more past due according to its contractual terms. Single-family and multifamily loans are reported past due if a full payment of principal and interest is not received within one month of its due date.

Interest income previously accrued but not collected is reversed through interest income at the date the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. For single-family loans on nonaccrual status, we recognize income when cash payments are received. We return a non-modified single-family loan to accrual status at the point when the borrower brings the loan current.

As a part of our single-family loss mitigation activities, we restructure loans where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. For the purpose of income recognition, we require the borrower to complete a performance period for those loss mitigation arrangements that bring the loan current via the capitalization of the past due principal and interest (i.e., contractual modifications and payment deferrals). In that regard, our contractual modifications generally include a trial period (a performance period of generally 3 to 4 months) that the borrower has to complete before the loan is permanently modified. The loans that receive these contractual modifications are not returned to accrual status until the borrower has successfully made all required payments during the trial period and the modification is made permanent. As payment deferrals do not include a trial period, these restructurings are not returned to accrual status until the borrower has made three consecutive contractual payments. If interest is capitalized pursuant to either a loan modification or a payment deferral, any capitalized interest that had not been previously recognized as interest income is recorded as a discount to the loan and amortized over the life of the loan.

For loans that have not been negatively impacted by COVID-19, we place a multifamily loan on nonaccrual status when the loan becomes two months or more past due according to its contractual terms unless the loan is well secured such that collectability of principal and accrued interest is reasonably assured. For multifamily loans on nonaccrual status, we apply any payment received on a cost recovery basis to reduce principal on the mortgage loan. We return a multifamily loan to accrual status when the borrower cures the delinquency of the loan.

The table below displays the accrued interest receivable written off through the reversal of interest income for nonaccrual loans.


		For the Three Months Ended June 30,
		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Accrued interest receivable written off through the reversal of interest income:
Single-family		$	15	$	21
Multifamily		1		—


		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Accrued interest receivable written off through the reversal of interest income:
Single-family		$	32	$	129
Multifamily		1		1


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						92


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Mortgage Loans

The tables below include the amortized cost of and interest income recognized on our HFI single-family and multifamily loans on nonaccrual status by class, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option.


	As of				For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
	June 30, 2022		March 31, 2022					December 31, 2021
	Amortized Cost				Total Interest Income Recognized(1)
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	10,241	$	13,692		$	17,599	$	34	$	82
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	245		331			430		1		2
Adjustable-rate	59		84			107		—		—
Other	698		913			1,101		2		5
Total single-family	11,243		15,020			19,237		37		89
Multifamily	1,317		1,258			1,259		8		14
Total nonaccrual loans	$	12,560	$	16,278		$	20,496	$	45	$	103


	As of				For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021			For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
	June 30, 2021		March 31, 2021				December 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost				Total Interest Income Recognized(1)
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family:
20- and 30-year or more, amortizing fixed-rate	$	24,728	$	30,173	$	22,907		$	95	$	180
15-year or less, amortizing fixed-rate	596		945		853			2		3
Adjustable-rate	179		284		270			—		1
Other	1,761		2,583		2,475			6		11
Total single-family	27,264		33,985		26,505			103		195
Multifamily	2,220		2,153		2,069			4		13
Total nonaccrual loans	$	29,484	$	36,138	$	28,574		$	107	$	208

(1)Interest income recognized includes amortization of any deferred cost basis adjustments while the loan is performing and that is not reversed when the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. For loans negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, also includes amounts accrued but not collected prior to the loan being placed on nonaccrual status. For single-family, interest income recognized includes payments received on nonaccrual loans held as of period end.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						93


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Allowance for Loan Losses

4. Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain an allowance for loan losses for HFI loans held by Fannie Mae and by consolidated Fannie Mae MBS trusts, excluding loans for which we have elected the fair value option. When calculating our allowance for loan losses, we consider the unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums and discounts, and other cost basis adjustments of HFI loans at the balance sheet date. We record write-offs as a reduction to our allowance for loan losses at the point of foreclosure, completion of a short sale, upon the redesignation of nonperforming and reperforming loans from HFI to HFS or when a loan is determined to be uncollectible.

The following table displays changes in our allowance for single-family loans, multifamily loans and total allowance for loan losses. The benefit or provision for loan losses excludes provision for accrued interest receivable losses, guaranty loss reserves and credit losses on available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. Cumulatively, these amounts are recognized as “Benefit (provision) for credit losses” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Single-family allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	(5,241)	$	(8,547)	$	(4,950)	$	(9,344)
Benefit (provision) for loan losses	(248)		2,493		(530)		3,164
Write-offs	248		149		275		220
Recoveries	(84)		(77)		(117)		(79)
Other	(64)		(82)		(67)		(25)
Ending Balance	$	(5,389)	$	(6,064)	$	(5,389)	$	(6,064)
Multifamily allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	(658)	$	(1,081)	$	(679)	$	(1,208)
Benefit (provision) for loan losses	(12)		35		16		130
Write-offs	—		14		—		47
Recoveries	(10)		(18)		(17)		(19)

Ending Balance	$	(680)	$	(1,050)	$	(680)	$	(1,050)
Total allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	(5,899)	$	(9,628)	$	(5,629)	$	(10,552)
Benefit (provision) for loan losses	(260)		2,528		(514)		3,294
Write-offs	248		163		275		267
Recoveries	(94)		(95)		(134)		(98)
Other	(64)		(82)		(67)		(25)
Ending Balance	$	(6,069)	$	(7,114)	$	(6,069)	$	(7,114)

Our benefit or provision for loan losses can vary substantially from period to period based on a number of factors, such as changes in actual and forecasted home prices or property valuations, fluctuations in actual and forecasted interest rates, borrower payment behavior, events such as natural disasters or pandemics, the type, volume and effectiveness of our loss mitigation activities, including forbearances and loan modifications, the volume of foreclosures completed, and the redesignation of loans from HFI to HFS. Our benefit or provision can also be impacted by updates to the models, assumptions, and data used in determining our allowance for loan losses.

In recent periods, changes in actual and projected interest rates have been a meaningful driver of our benefit or provision for loan losses as these changes drive prepayment speeds and impact the measurement of the economic concessions granted to borrowers on modified loans. However, pursuant to our adoption of ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 2022, we prospectively discontinued TDR accounting and no longer measure the economic concession for restructurings occurring on or after the adoption date. This accounting also results in the elimination of any existing economic concession related to a loan that was previously designated as a TDR if such loan is restructured on or after January 1, 2022. See “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance” for more information about our adoption of ASU 2022-02.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						94


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Allowance for Loan Losses

The largest driver of our single-family provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 was an increase in actual and projected interest rates as of June 30, 2022 compared with March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. As mortgage rates increase, we expect a decrease in future prepayments on single-family loans, including modified loans accounted for as TDRs. Lower expected prepayments extend the expected lives of these TDR loans, which increases the expected impairment relating to economic concessions provided on them, resulting in a provision for loan losses.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2021 were:

•Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, home price growth was very strong. We also increased our expectations for home price growth on a national basis for full-year 2021.

•Benefit from lower actual and projected interest rates. Actual and projected interest rates decreased as of June 30, 2021 compared with March 31, 2021.

•Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies as discussed below.

The primary factors that contributed to our single-family benefit for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2021 were:

•Benefit from actual and forecasted home price growth.

•Benefit from the redesignation of certain reperforming single-family loans from HFI to HFS consistent with the discussion above.

•Benefit from changes in assumptions regarding COVID-19 forbearance and loan delinquencies. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, management used its judgment to reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was previously applied to the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The decrease in uncertainty as of June 30, 2021 compared with the end of 2020 was primarily driven by the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provided additional economic stimulus and helped support continued economic recovery. In addition, the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination program in the United States contributed to a significant increase in business activity and an improved economy in 2021, decreased uncertainty surrounding the post-pandemic recovery. There was also decreased political uncertainty, as well as a decrease in the number of borrowers in a COVID-19-related forbearance, lessening expectations of loan losses. However, management continued to apply its judgment and supplemented model results as of June 30, 2021 as uncertainty remained regarding the loss mitigation outcomes of borrowers still in forbearance and the future course of the pandemic, including the impact on the economy of the spread of new variants of the virus and low vaccination rates in certain areas of the country.

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2022, was a provision expense from higher actual and projected interest rates. This provision was partially offset by a benefit from actual and projected economic data, including strong property value growth, driven by continued demand for multifamily housing.

The primary factor that contributed to our multifamily benefit for loan losses in the six months ended June 30, 2022, was a benefit from actual and projected economic data. This benefit was partially offset by a provision from higher actual and projected interest rates.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						95


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Allowance for Loan Losses

The primary factors that contributed to our multifamily benefit for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 were:

•Benefit from actual and projected economic data. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, property value forecasts increased due to continued demand for multifamily housing. In addition, improved job growth led to an increase in projected average property net operating income, which reduced the probability of loan defaults resulting in a benefit for loan losses for the second quarter and first half of 2021.

•Benefit from lower expected credit losses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to our single-family provision for loan losses described above, for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, management used its judgment to further reduce the non-modeled adjustment that was previously applied to the loss projections developed by our credit loss model to account for uncertainty. The remaining non-modeled adjustment as of June 30, 2021, reflected management’s judgment that uncertainty remained surrounding the subsequent course of the pandemic, including new strains of the virus and its effect on the economy.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						96


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Investments in Securities

5. Investments in Securities

Trading Securities

Trading securities are recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The following table displays our investments in trading securities.


		As of
		June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021

	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage-related securities:
Fannie Mae		$	1,295	$	1,576
Other agency(1)		2,508		2,893
Other mortgage-related securities		112		137
Total mortgage-related securities (includes $469 million and $593 million, respectively, related to consolidated trusts)		3,915		4,606



Non-mortgage-related securities(2)		60,896		83,600
Total trading securities		$	64,811	$	88,206

(1)Consists of Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae mortgage-related securities.

(2)Primarily includes U.S. Treasury securities.

The following table displays information about our net trading gains (losses).


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,

			2022		2021		2022		2021

		(Dollars in millions)
Net trading gains (losses)			$	(665)	$	161	$	(2,435)	$	(597)
Net trading gains (losses) recognized in the period related to securities still held at period end			(546)		156		(2,173)		(586)

Available-for-Sale Securities

We record AFS securities at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, recorded net of tax, as a component of “Other comprehensive loss” and we recognize realized gains and losses from the sale of AFS securities in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. We define the amortized cost basis of our AFS securities as unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized premiums and discounts, and other cost basis adjustments. We record an allowance for credit losses for AFS securities that reflects the impairment for credit losses, which are limited to the amount that fair value is less than the amortized cost. Impairment due to non-credit losses are recorded as unrealized losses within “Other comprehensive loss.”

The following tables display the amortized cost, allowance for credit losses, gross unrealized gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”), and fair value by major security type for AFS securities.


	As of June 30, 2022
	Total Amortized Cost			Allowance for Credit Losses(1)		Gross Unrealized Gains in AOCI		Gross Unrealized Losses in AOCI		Total Fair Value

	(Dollars in millions)
Fannie Mae		$	461	$	—	$	11	$	(14)	$	458
Other agency(2)		10		—		—		—		10




Other mortgage-related securities		293		—		6		(2)		297
Total		$	764	$	—	$	17	$	(16)	$	765


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						97


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Investments in Securities


	As of December 31, 2021
	Total Amortized Cost			Allowance for Credit Losses(1)		Gross Unrealized Gains in AOCI		Gross Unrealized Losses in AOCI		Total Fair Value

	(Dollars in millions)
Fannie Mae		$	492	$	—	$	14	$	(11)	$	495
Other agency(2)		12		—		—		—		12



Other mortgage-related securities		323		—		10		(3)		330
Total		$	827	$	—	$	24	$	(14)	$	837

(1)Total allowance for credit losses is less than $0.5 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

(2)Other agency securities consist of securities issued by Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.

Fannie Mae and Other Agency Securities

Our Fannie Mae and other agency AFS securities consist of securities issued by us, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. The principal and interest on these securities are guaranteed by the issuing agency. We believe that the guaranty provided by the issuing agency, the support provided to the agencies by the U.S. government, the importance of the agencies to the liquidity and stability in the secondary mortgage market, and the long history of zero credit losses on agency mortgage-related securities are all indicators that there are currently no credit losses on these securities, even if the security is in an unrealized loss position. In addition, we generally hold these securities that are in an unrealized loss position to recovery. As a result, unless we intend to sell the security, we do not recognize an allowance for credit losses on agency mortgage-related securities.

Non-Agency Mortgage-Related Securities

As of June 30, 2022, substantially all of our non-agency mortgage-related securities were in an unrealized gain position.

The following table displays additional information regarding gross unrealized losses and fair value by major security type for AFS securities in an unrealized loss position, excluding allowance for credit losses.


	As of
	June 30, 2022										December 31, 2021
	Less Than 12 Consecutive Months					12 Consecutive Months or Longer					Less Than 12 Consecutive Months					12 Consecutive Months or Longer
	Gross Unrealized Losses in AOCI			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses in AOCI			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses in AOCI			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses in AOCI			Fair Value

	(Dollars in millions)
Fannie Mae		$	(12)	$	158		$	(2)	$	36		$	(5)	$	225		$	(6)	$	102
Other mortgage-related securities		(2)		9			—		—			(3)		3			—		—

Total		$	(14)	$	167		$	(2)	$	36		$	(8)	$	228		$	(6)	$	102

The following table displays the gross realized gains (losses) and proceeds on sales of AFS securities.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,

	2022		2021		2022		2021

	(Dollars in millions)
Gross realized gains	$	—	$	46	$	—	$	59
Total proceeds (excludes initial sale of securities from new portfolio securitizations)	—		467		—		582


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						98


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Investments in Securities

The following table displays net unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities and other amounts recorded within our accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.


	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021

	(Dollars in millions)
Net unrealized gains on AFS securities for which we have not recorded an allowance for credit losses	$	2	$	9
Net unrealized losses on AFS securities for which we have recorded an allowance for credit losses	(2)		(2)
Other	27		31
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	27	$	38

Maturity Information

The following table displays the amortized cost and fair value of our AFS securities by major security type and remaining contractual maturity, assuming no principal prepayments. The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities is not a reliable indicator of their expected life because borrowers generally have the right to prepay their obligations at any time.


	As of June 30, 2022
	Total Carrying Amount(1)			Total Fair Value		One Year or Less					After One Year Through Five Years					After Five Years Through Ten Years					After Ten Years
						Net Carrying Amount(1)			Fair Value		Net Carrying Amount(1)			Fair Value		Net Carrying Amount(1)			Fair Value		Net Carrying Amount(1)			Fair Value

	(Dollars in millions)
Fannie Mae		$	461	$	458		$	—	$	—		$	3	$	3		$	13	$	14		$	445	$	441
Other agency		10		10			—		—			—		—			1		1			9		9




Other mortgage-related securities		293		297			4		4			20		20			15		15			254		258
Total		$	764	$	765		$	4	$	4		$	23	$	23		$	29	$	30		$	708	$	708

(1)Net carrying amount consists of amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses on AFS debt securities but does not include any unrealized fair value gains or losses.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						99


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Financial Guarantees

6. Financial Guarantees

We recognize a guaranty obligation for our obligation to stand ready to perform on our guarantees to unconsolidated trusts and other guaranty arrangements. These off-balance sheet guarantees expose us to credit losses primarily relating to the unpaid principal balance of our unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS and other financial guarantees. The maximum remaining contractual term of our guarantees is 30 years; however, the actual term of each guaranty may be significantly less than the contractual term based on the prepayment characteristics of the related mortgage loans. We measure our guaranty reserve for estimated credit losses for off-balance sheet exposures over the contractual period for which they are exposed to the credit risk, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.

As the guarantor of structured securities backed in whole or in part by Freddie Mac-issued securities, we extend our guaranty to the underlying Freddie Mac securities in our resecuritization trusts. However, Freddie Mac continues to guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the underlying Freddie Mac securities that we have resecuritized. When we began issuing UMBS, we entered into an indemnification agreement under which Freddie Mac agreed to indemnify us for losses caused by its failure to meet its payment or other specified obligations under the trust agreements pursuant to which the underlying resecuritized securities were issued. As a result, and due to the funding commitment available to Freddie Mac through its senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, we have concluded that the associated credit risk is negligible. Accordingly, we exclude from the following table Freddie Mac securities backing unconsolidated Fannie Mae-issued structured securities of approximately $247.6 billion and $212.3 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

The following table displays our off-balance sheet maximum exposure, guaranty obligation recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets and the potential maximum recovery from third parties through available credit enhancements and recourse related to our financial guarantees.


	As of
	June 30, 2022						December 31, 2021
	Maximum Exposure		Guaranty Obligation		Maximum Recovery(1)		Maximum Exposure		Guaranty Obligation		Maximum Recovery(1)
	(Dollars in millions)
Unconsolidated Fannie Mae MBS	$	3,385	$	15	$	3,294	$	3,733	$	16	$	3,626
Other guaranty arrangements(2)	10,110		79		2,087		10,423		85		2,117
Total	$	13,495	$	94	$	5,381	$	14,156	$	101	$	5,743

(1)Recoverability of such credit enhancements and recourse is subject to, among other factors, the ability of our mortgage insurers and the U.S. government, as a financial guarantor, to meet their obligations to us. For information on our mortgage insurers, “Note 10, Concentrations of Credit Risk.”

(2)Primarily consists of credit enhancements and long-term standby commitments.

7. Short-Term and Long-Term Debt

Short-Term Debt

The following table displays our outstanding short-term debt (debt with an original contractual maturity of one year or less) and weighted-average interest rates of this debt.


	As of
	June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Outstanding		Weighted- Average Interest Rate(1)		Outstanding		Weighted- Average Interest Rate(1)
	(Dollars in millions)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(2)	$	1,466	1.45	%	$	—	—	%
Short-term debt of Fannie Mae	7,590		0.95		2,795		0.03

(1)Includes the effects of discounts, premiums and other cost basis adjustments.

(2)Represents agreements to repurchase securities for a specified price, with repayment generally occurring on the following day, reported as “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						100


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Short-Term and Long-Term Debt

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt represents debt with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year. The following table displays our outstanding long-term debt.


	As of
	June 30, 2022					December 31, 2021
	Maturities	Outstanding(1)		Weighted- Average Interest Rate(2)		Maturities	Outstanding(1)		Weighted- Average Interest Rate(2)
	(Dollars in millions)
Senior fixed:
Benchmark notes and bonds	2022 - 2030	$	78,400	2.33	%	2022 - 2030	$	89,618	2.13	%
Medium-term notes(3)	2022 - 2031	37,718		0.61		2022 - 2031	38,312		0.60
Other(4)	2023 - 2038	6,852		4.04		2023 - 2038	7,045		3.73
Total senior fixed		122,970		1.91			134,975		1.78
Senior floating:
Medium-term notes(3)	2022	4,025		1.28		2022	51,583		0.32
Connecticut Avenue Securities(5)	2023 - 2031	9,617		5.40		2023 - 2031	11,166		4.30
Other(6)	2037	253		9.26		2037	373		7.17
Total senior floating		13,895		4.38			63,122		1.05


Total long-term debt of Fannie Mae(7)		136,865		2.16			198,097		1.55
Debt of consolidated trusts	2022 - 2061	4,064,192		2.17		2022 - 2061	3,957,299		1.89
Total long-term debt		$	4,201,057	2.17	%		$	4,155,396	1.88	%

(1)Outstanding debt balance consists of the unpaid principal balance, premiums and discounts, fair value adjustments, hedge-related basis adjustments, and other cost basis adjustments.

(2)Excludes the effects of fair value adjustments and hedge-related basis adjustments.

(3)Includes long-term debt with an original contractual maturity of greater than 1 year and up to 10 years, excluding zero-coupon debt.

(4)Includes other long-term debt with an original contractual maturity of greater than 10 years and foreign exchange bonds.

(5)Consists of CAS debt issued prior to November 2018, a portion of which is reported at fair value. See “Note 2, Consolidations and Transfers of Financial Assets” in our 2021 Form 10-K for more information about our CAS structures issued beginning November 2018.

(6)Consists of structured debt instruments that are reported at fair value.

(7)Includes unamortized discounts and premiums, fair value adjustments, hedge-related cost basis adjustments, and other cost basis adjustments in a net discount position of $3.9 billion and $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						101


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Derivative Instruments

8. Derivative Instruments

Derivative instruments are an integral part of our strategy in managing interest-rate risk. Derivative instruments may be privately-negotiated, bilateral contracts, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We refer to our derivative transactions made pursuant to bilateral contracts as our over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative transactions and our derivative transactions accepted for clearing by a derivatives clearing organization as our cleared derivative transactions. We typically do not settle the notional amount of our risk management derivatives; rather, notional amounts provide the basis for calculating actual payments or settlement amounts. The derivative contracts we use for interest-rate risk management purposes consist primarily of interest-rate swaps and interest-rate options. See “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” in our 2021 Form 10-K for additional information on interest-rate risk management.

We account for certain forms of credit risk transfer transactions as derivatives. In our credit risk transfer transactions, a portion of the credit risk associated with losses on a reference pool of mortgage loans is transferred to a third party. We enter into derivative transactions that are associated with some of our credit risk transfer transactions, whereby we manage investment risk to guarantee that certain unconsolidated VIEs have sufficient cash flows to pay their contractual obligations.

We enter into forward purchase and sale commitments that lock in the future delivery of mortgage loans and mortgage-related securities at a fixed price or yield. Certain commitments to purchase mortgage loans and purchase or sell mortgage-related securities meet the criteria of a derivative. We typically settle the notional amount of our mortgage commitments that are accounted for as derivatives.

We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at their fair value on a trade date basis. Fair value amounts, which are (1) netted to the extent a legal right of offset exists and is enforceable by law at the counterparty level and (2) inclusive of the right or obligation associated with the cash collateral posted or received, are recorded in “Other assets” or “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. See “Note 12, Fair Value” for additional information on derivatives recorded at fair value. We present cash flows from derivatives as operating activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Fair Value Hedge Accounting

As discussed in “Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our 2021 Form 10-K, we implemented a fair value hedge accounting program in January 2021. Pursuant to this program, we may designate certain interest-rate swaps as hedging instruments in hedges of the change in fair value attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate for certain closed pools of fixed-rate, single-family mortgage loans or our funding debt. For hedged items in qualifying fair value hedging relationships, changes in fair value attributable to the designated risk are recognized as a basis adjustment to the hedged item. We also report changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument in the same condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income line item used to recognize the earnings effect of the hedged item’s basis adjustment. The objective of our fair value hedges is to reduce GAAP earnings volatility related to changes in benchmark interest rates.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						102


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Derivative Instruments

Notional and Fair Value Position of our Derivatives

The following table displays the notional amount and estimated fair value of our asset and liability derivative instruments, including derivative instruments designated as hedges.


	As of June 30, 2022						As of December 31, 2021
	Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value				Notional Amount			Estimated Fair Value
			Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives						Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives
	(Dollars in millions)
Risk management derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Swaps:(1)
Pay-fixed	$	5,920	$	—	$	—		$	4,347		$	—	$	—
Receive-fixed	45,943		—		—			40,686			—		—

Total risk management derivatives designated as hedging instruments	51,863		—		—			45,033			—		—
Risk management derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Swaps:(1)
Pay-fixed	74,548		—		—			56,817			—		—
Receive-fixed	75,951		—		(3,514)			56,874			—		(1,131)
Basis	41,250		35		—			250			152		—
Foreign currency	302		—		(69)			336			25		(34)
Swaptions:(1)
Pay-fixed	4,631		151		(3)			4,341			52		(2)
Receive-fixed	1,481		9		(33)			1,091			10		(21)

Total risk management derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	198,163		195		(3,619)			119,709			239		(1,188)


Netting adjustment(2)	—		63		3,540			—			(237)		1,173
Total risk management derivatives portfolio	250,026		258		(79)			164,742			2		(15)
Mortgage commitment derivatives:
Mortgage commitments to purchase whole loans	7,096		36		(12)			13,192			17		(5)
Forward contracts to purchase mortgage-related securities	44,811		358		(93)			58,021			83		(34)
Forward contracts to sell mortgage-related securities	72,054		237		(393)			111,173			69		(158)
Total mortgage commitment derivatives	123,961		631		(498)			182,386			169		(197)
Credit enhancement derivatives	24,099		3		(45)			19,256			—		(21)
Derivatives at fair value	$	398,086	$	892	$	(622)		$	366,384		$	171	$	(233)

(1)Centrally cleared derivatives have no ascribable fair value because the positions are settled daily.

(2)The netting adjustment represents the effect of the legal right to offset under legally enforceable master netting arrangements to settle with the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and received. Cash collateral posted was $3.7 billion and $966 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Cash collateral received was $83 million and $30 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						103


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Derivative Instruments

We record all gains and losses, including accrued interest, on derivatives while they are not in a qualifying designated hedging relationship in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The following table displays, by type of derivative instrument, the fair value gains and losses, net on our derivatives.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,

	2022		2021		2022		2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps:
Pay-fixed	$	1,174	$	(695)	$	3,299	$	1,512
Receive-fixed	(1,106)		757		(3,366)		(1,098)
Basis	(63)		19		(131)		(27)
Foreign currency	(36)		4		(60)		(4)
Swaptions:
Pay-fixed	54		(58)		98		49
Receive-fixed	(10)		30		(13)		(209)
Futures	(1)		—		(1)		1
Net contractual interest income (expense) on interest-rate swaps	(28)		7		(39)		(4)
Total risk management derivatives fair value gains (losses), net	(16)		64		(213)		220
Mortgage commitment derivatives fair value gains (losses), net	844		(553)		2,416		529
Credit enhancement derivatives fair value losses, net	(29)		(18)		(51)		(108)
Total derivatives fair value gains, net	$	799	$	(507)	$	2,152	$	641


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						104


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Derivative Instruments

Effect of Fair Value Hedge Accounting

The following table displays the effect of fair value hedge accounting on our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, including gains and losses recognized on fair value hedging relationships.



	For the Three Months Ended June 30,								For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022				2021				2022				2021
	Interest Income: Mortgage Loans		Interest Expense: Long-Term Debt		Interest Income: Mortgage Loans		Interest Expense: Long-Term Debt		Interest Income: Mortgage Loans		Interest Expense: Long-Term Debt		Interest Income: Mortgage Loans		Interest Expense: Long-Term Debt
	(Dollars in millions)
Total amounts presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income	$	29,082	$	(21,642)	$	24,932	$	(16,820)	$	56,224	$	(41,582)	$	48,285	$	(33,637)




Gains (losses) from fair value hedging relationships:
Mortgage loans HFI and related interest-rate contracts:
Hedged items	$	(344)	$	—	$	106	$	—	$	(582)	$	—	$	70	$	—
Discontinued hedge related basis adjustment amortization	5		—		—		—		5		—		—		—


Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	337		—		(106)		—		564		—		(70)		—
Interest accruals on hedging instruments	(9)		—		(5)		—		(17)		—		(5)		—
Debt of Fannie Mae and related interest-rate contracts:
Hedged items	—		748		—		(390)		—		2,371		—		805
Discontinued hedge-related basis adjustment amortization	—		(119)		—		(21)		—		(184)		—		(34)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	—		(568)		—		423		—		(2,092)		—		(791)
Interest accruals on derivative hedging instruments	—		7		—		59		—		54		—		113
Total effect of fair value hedges	$	(11)	$	68	$	(5)	$	71	$	(30)	$	149	$	(5)	$	93


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						105


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Derivative Instruments

Hedged Items in Fair Value Hedging Relationships

The following table displays the carrying amounts of the hedged items that have been in qualifying fair value hedges recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, including the hedged item's cumulative basis adjustments and the closed portfolio balances under the last-of-layer method. The hedged item carrying amounts and total basis adjustments include both open and discontinued hedges. The amortized cost and designated UPB consists only of open hedges as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.


	As of June 30, 2022
	Carrying Amount Assets (Liabilities)		Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments Included in the Carrying Amount				Closed Portfolio of Mortgage Loans Under Last-of-Layer Method
			Total Basis Adjustments(1)(2)		Remaining Adjustments - Discontinued Hedge		Total Amortized Cost		Designated UPB
	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage loans HFI	$	242,843	$	(443)	$	(443)	$	70,938	$	5,649

Debt of Fannie Mae	(76,004)		3,468		3,468		N/A		N/A


	As of December 31, 2021
	Carrying Amount Assets (Liabilities)		Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Basis Adjustments Included in the Carrying Amount				Closed Portfolio of Mortgage Loans Under Last-of-Layer Method
			Total Basis Adjustments(1)(2)		Remaining Adjustments - Discontinued Hedge		Total Amortized Cost		Designated UPB
	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage loans HFI	$	174,080	$	134	$	134	$	56,786	$	4,389

Debt of Fannie Mae	(72,174)		1,281		1,281		N/A		N/A

(1) No basis adjustment associated with open hedges, as all hedges are designated at the close of business with a one-day term.

(2) Based on the unamortized balance of the hedge-related cost basis.

Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to interest-rate derivative contracts. We are exposed to the risk that a counterparty in a derivative transaction will default on payments due to us, which may require us to seek a replacement derivative from a different counterparty. This replacement may be at a higher cost, or we may be unable to find a suitable replacement. We manage our derivative counterparty credit exposure relating to our risk management derivative transactions mainly through enforceable master netting arrangements, which allow us to net derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty or clearing organization and clearing member. For our OTC derivative transactions, we require counterparties to post collateral, which may include cash, U.S. Treasury securities, agency debt and agency mortgage-related securities.

See “Note 11, Netting Arrangements” for information on our rights to offset assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						106


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Segment Reporting

9. Segment Reporting

We have two reportable business segments, which are based on the type of business activities each perform: Single-Family and Multifamily. Results of our two business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The sum of the results for our two business segments equals our condensed consolidated results of operations. For additional information related to our business segments, including basis of organization and other segment activities, see “Note 10, Segment Reporting” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Segment Allocations and Results

The majority of our revenues and expenses are directly associated with each respective business segment and are included in determining its operating results. Those revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable to a particular business segment are allocated based on the size of each segment’s guaranty book of business. The substantial majority of the gains and losses associated with our risk management derivatives, including the impact of hedge accounting, are allocated to our Single-Family business segment.

The following table displays our segment results.


	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2022						2021
	Single-Family		Multifamily		Total		Single-Family		Multifamily		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income(1)	$	6,573	$	1,235	$	7,808	$	7,323	$	963	$	8,286
Fee and other income(2)	60		21		81		80		23		103
Net revenues	6,633		1,256		7,889		7,403		986		8,389
Investment gains (losses), net(3)	(27)		(22)		(49)		658		(12)		646
Fair value gains (losses), net(4)	543		(14)		529		(386)		(60)		(446)
Administrative expenses	(671)		(124)		(795)		(619)		(127)		(746)
Credit-related income (expense):(5)
Benefit (provision) for credit losses	(206)		(12)		(218)		2,553		35		2,588
Foreclosed property income (expense)	(25)		(8)		(33)		(28)		(13)		(41)
Total credit-related income (expense)	(231)		(20)		(251)		2,525		22		2,547
TCCA fees(6)	(841)		—		(841)		(758)		—		(758)
Credit enhancement expense(7)	(270)		(62)		(332)		(219)		(55)		(274)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries(8)	(43)		(4)		(47)		(57)		13		(44)
Other income (expenses), net	(199)		(29)		(228)		(315)		35		(280)
Income before federal income taxes	4,894		981		5,875		8,232		802		9,034
Provision for federal income taxes	(1,008)		(214)		(1,222)		(1,725)		(157)		(1,882)
Net income	$	3,886	$	767	$	4,653	$	6,507	$	645	$	7,152


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						107


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Segment Reporting


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2022						2021
	Single-Family		Multifamily		Total		Single-Family		Multifamily		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income(1)	$	12,828	$	2,379	$	15,207	$	13,217	$	1,811	$	15,028
Fee and other income(2)	121		43		164		142		48		190
Net revenues	12,949		2,422		15,371		13,359		1,859		15,218
Investment gains (losses), net(3)	(93)		(58)		(151)		722		(31)		691
Fair value gains (losses), net(4)	1,070		(61)		1,009		354		(16)		338
Administrative expenses	(1,354)		(249)		(1,603)		(1,242)		(252)		(1,494)
Credit-related income (expense):(5)
Benefit (provision) for credit losses	(476)		18		(458)		3,215		138		3,353
Foreclosed property expense	9		(3)		6		(11)		(25)		(36)
Total credit-related income (expense)	(467)		15		(452)		3,204		113		3,317
TCCA fees(6)	(1,665)		—		(1,665)		(1,489)		—		(1,489)
Credit enhancement expense(7)	(480)		(130)		(610)		(445)		(113)		(558)
Change in expected credit enhancement recoveries(8)	26		(13)		13		(73)		(2)		(75)
Other income (expenses), net	(397)		(67)		(464)		(602)		3		(599)
Income before federal income taxes	9,589		1,859		11,448		13,788		1,561		15,349
Provision for federal income taxes	(1,994)		(393)		(2,387)		(2,887)		(317)		(3,204)
Net income	$	7,595	$	1,466	$	9,061	$	10,901	$	1,244	$	12,145

(1)Net interest income primarily consists of guaranty fees received as compensation for assuming and managing the credit risk on loans underlying Fannie Mae MBS held by third parties for the respective business segment, and the difference between the interest income earned on the respective business segment’s mortgage assets in our retained mortgage portfolio and the interest expense associated with the debt funding those assets. Revenues from single-family guaranty fees include revenues generated by the 10 basis point increase in guaranty fees pursuant to the TCCA, the incremental revenue from which is remitted to Treasury and not retained by us. Also includes yield maintenance revenue we recognized on the prepayment of multifamily loans.

(2)Single-family fee and other income primarily consists of compensation for engaging in structured transactions and providing other lender services. Multifamily fee and other income consists of fees associated with Multifamily business activities, including credit enhancements for tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue bonds.

(3)Single-family investment gains and losses primarily consist of gains and losses on the sale of mortgage assets. Multifamily investment gains and losses primarily consist of gains and losses on resecuritization activity.

(4)Single-family fair value gains and losses primarily consist of fair value gains and losses on risk management and mortgage commitment derivatives, trading securities, fair value option debt, and other financial instruments associated with our single-family guaranty book of business. Multifamily fair value gains and losses primarily consist of fair value gains and losses on MBS commitment derivatives, trading securities and other financial instruments associated with our multifamily guaranty book of business.

(5)Credit-related income or expense is based on the guaranty book of business of the respective business segment and consists of the applicable segment’s benefit or provision for credit losses and foreclosed property income or expense on loans underlying the segment’s guaranty book of business.

(6)Consists of the portion of our single-family guaranty fees that is remitted to Treasury pursuant to the TCCA.

(7)Single-family credit enhancement expense consists of costs associated with our freestanding credit enhancements, which include primarily costs associated with our Credit Insurance Risk TransferTM (“CIRTTM”), Connecticut Avenue Securities® (“CAS”) and enterprise-paid mortgage insurance (“EPMI”) programs. Multifamily credit enhancement expense primarily consists of costs associated with our Multifamily CIRTTM (“MCIRTTM”) and Multifamily Connecticut Avenue SecuritiesTM (“MCASTM”) programs as well as amortization expense for certain lender risk-sharing programs. Excludes CAS transactions accounted for as debt instruments and credit risk transfer programs accounted for as derivative instruments.

(8)Consists of change in benefits recognized from our freestanding credit enhancements, primarily from our CAS and CIRT programs as well as certain lender risk-sharing arrangements, including our multifamily Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS®”) program.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						108


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Concentrations of Credit Risk

10. Concentrations of Credit Risk

Risk Characteristics of our Guaranty Book of Business

One of the measures by which we gauge our credit risk is the delinquency status of the mortgage loans in our guaranty book of business.

For single-family and multifamily loans, we use this information, in conjunction with housing market and other economic data, to structure our pricing and our eligibility and underwriting criteria to reflect the current risk of loans with higher-risk characteristics, and in some cases we decide to significantly reduce our participation in riskier loan product categories. Management also uses this data together with other credit risk measures to identify key trends that guide the development of our loss mitigation strategies.

We report the delinquency status of our single-family and multifamily guaranty book of business below. We report loans receiving payment forbearance as delinquent according to the contractual terms of the loans.

Single-Family Credit Risk Characteristics

For single-family loans, management monitors the serious delinquency rate, which is the percentage of single-family loans, based on the number of loans, that are 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process, and loans that have higher risk characteristics, such as high mark-to-market LTV ratios.

The following tables display the delinquency status and serious delinquency rates for specified loan categories of our single-family conventional guaranty book of business.


	As of
	June 30, 2022						December 31, 2021
	30 Days Delinquent		60 Days Delinquent		Seriously Delinquent(1)		30 Days Delinquent		60 Days Delinquent		Seriously Delinquent(1)
Percentage of single-family conventional guaranty book of business based on UPB	0.71	%	0.15	%	0.73	%	0.73	%	0.16	%	1.20	%
Percentage of single-family conventional loans based on loan count	0.84		0.19		0.81		0.86		0.20		1.25


	As of
	June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business Based on UPB		Serious Delinquency Rate(1)		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business Based on UPB		Serious Delinquency Rate(1)
Estimated mark-to-market LTV ratio:
80.01% to 90%	4	%	0.52	%	5	%	0.88	%
90.01% to 100%	1		0.46		2		0.51
Greater than 100%	*		9.40		*		12.41
Geographical distribution:
California	19		0.59		19		1.01
Florida	6		0.92		6		1.59
Illinois	3		1.08		3		1.55
New Jersey	3		1.17		3		1.90
New York	5		1.54		5		2.24
All other states	64		0.76		64		1.16
Vintages:
2004 and prior	1		2.75		1		3.48
2005-2008	1		4.45		2		5.87
2009-2022	98		0.63		97		1.01

* Represents less than 0.5% of single-family conventional guaranty book of business.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						109


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Concentrations of Credit Risk

(1)Based on loan count, consists of single-family conventional loans that were 90 days or more past due or in the foreclosure process as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

Multifamily Credit Risk Characteristics

For multifamily loans, management monitors the serious delinquency rate, which is the percentage of multifamily loans, based on unpaid principal balance, that are 60 days or more past due, and loans with other higher risk characteristics to determine the overall credit quality of our multifamily book of business. Higher risk characteristics include, but are not limited to, current debt service coverage ratio (“DSCR”) below 1.0 and original LTV ratios greater than 80%. We stratify multifamily loans into different internal risk categories based on the credit risk inherent in each individual loan.

The following tables display the delinquency status and serious delinquency rates for specified loan categories of our multifamily guaranty book of business.


	As of
	June 30, 2022(1)				December 31, 2021(1)
	30 Days Delinquent		Seriously Delinquent(2)		30 Days Delinquent		Seriously Delinquent(2)
Percentage of multifamily guaranty book of business	0.04	%	0.34	%	0.03	%	0.42	%


	As of
	June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
	Percentage of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business(1)		Serious Delinquency Rate(2)(3)		Percentage of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business(1)		Serious Delinquency Rate(2)(3)
Original LTV ratio:
Greater than 80%	1	%	0.13	%	1	%	0.13	%
Less than or equal to 80%	99		0.34		99		0.42
Current DSCR below 1.0(4)	3		6.71		2		13.90

(1)Calculated based on the aggregate unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans for each category divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans in our multifamily guaranty book of business.

(2)Consists of multifamily loans that were 60 days or more past due as of the dates indicated.

(3)Calculated based on the unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans that were seriously delinquent divided by the aggregate unpaid principal balance of multifamily loans for each category included in our multifamily guaranty book of business.

(4)Our estimates of current DSCRs are based on the latest available income information from annual statements for these properties.

Other Concentrations

Mortgage Insurers. Mortgage insurance “risk in force” refers to our maximum potential loss recovery under the applicable mortgage insurance policies in force and is generally based on the loan-level insurance coverage percentage and, if applicable, any aggregate pool loss limit, as specified in the policy.

The following table displays our total mortgage insurance risk in force by primary and pool insurance, as well as the total risk-in-force mortgage insurance coverage as a percentage of the single-family conventional guaranty book of business.


	As of
	June 30, 2022			December 31, 2021
	Risk in Force		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business	Risk in Force		Percentage of Single-Family Conventional Guaranty Book of Business
	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage insurance risk in force:
Primary mortgage insurance	$	183,771		$	176,587
Pool mortgage insurance	247			261
Total mortgage insurance risk in force	$	184,018	5%	$	176,848	5%


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						110


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Concentrations of Credit Risk

The table below displays our mortgage insurer counterparties that provided approximately 10% or more of the risk-in-force mortgage insurance coverage on mortgage loans in our single-family conventional guaranty book of business.


	Percentage of Risk-in-Force Coverage by Mortgage Insurer
	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021

Counterparty:(1)
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp.	19	%	19	%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.	19		19
Radian Guaranty, Inc.	17		17
Enact Mortgage Insurance Corp.(2)	17		17
Essent Guaranty, Inc.	16		16
National Mortgage Insurance Corp.	11		11
Others	1		1
Total	100	%	100	%

(1)Insurance coverage amounts provided for each counterparty may include coverage provided by affiliates and subsidiaries of the counterparty.

(2)Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corp. was renamed Enact Mortgage Insurance Corp. effective February 7, 2022.

We have counterparty credit risk relating to the potential insolvency of, or non-performance by, monoline mortgage insurers that insure single-family loans we purchase or guarantee. There is risk that these counterparties may fail to fulfill their obligations to pay our claims under insurance policies. On at least a quarterly basis, we assess our mortgage insurer counterparties’ respective abilities to fulfill their obligations to us. Our assessment includes financial reviews and analyses of the insurers’ portfolios and capital adequacy. If we determine that it is probable that we will not collect all of our claims from one or more of our mortgage insurer counterparties, it could increase our loss reserves, which could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and net worth.

When we estimate the credit losses that are inherent in our mortgage loans and under the terms of our guaranty obligations, we also consider the recoveries that we expect to receive from primary mortgage insurance, as mortgage insurance recoveries reduce the severity of the loss associated with defaulted loans if the borrower defaults and title to the property is subsequently transferred. Mortgage insurance does not cover credit losses that result from a reduction in mortgage interest paid by the borrower in connection with a loan modification, forbearance of principal, or forbearance of scheduled loan payments. We evaluate the financial condition of our mortgage insurer counterparties and adjust the contractually due recovery amounts to ensure that expected credit losses as of the balance sheet date are included in our loss reserve estimate. As a result, if our assessment of one or more of our mortgage insurer counterparties’ ability to fulfill their respective obligations to us worsens, it could increase our loss reserves. Our estimated benefit from mortgage insurance, which is based on estimated credit losses as of period end, reduced our loss reserves by $559 million as of both June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had outstanding receivables of $516 million and $533 million, respectively, recorded in “Other assets” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets related to amounts claimed on insured, defaulted loans excluding government-insured loans. As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we assessed these outstanding receivables for collectability, and established a valuation allowance of $463 million and $479 million, respectively.

Mortgage Servicers and Sellers. Mortgage servicers collect mortgage and escrow payments from borrowers, pay taxes and insurance costs from escrow accounts, monitor and report delinquencies, and perform other required activities, including loss mitigation, on our behalf. Our mortgage servicers and sellers may also be obligated to repurchase loans or real estate owned (“REO”) properties, reimburse us for losses or provide other remedies under certain circumstances, such as if it is determined that the mortgage loan did not meet our underwriting or eligibility requirements, if certain loan representations and warranties are violated or if mortgage insurers rescind coverage. Our representation and warranty framework does not require repurchase for loans that have breaches of certain selling representations and warranties if they have met specified criteria for relief.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						111


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Concentrations of Credit Risk

Our business with mortgage servicers is concentrated. The table below displays the percentage of our single-family guaranty book of business serviced by our top five depository single-family mortgage servicers and top five non-depository single-family mortgage servicers (i.e., servicers that are not insured depository institutions), and identifies one servicer that serviced 10% or more of our single-family guaranty book of business as of December 31, 2021, based on unpaid principal balance.


	Percentage of Single-Family Guaranty Book of Business
	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with its affiliates)	9	%	10	%
Remaining top five depository servicers	12		11
Top five non-depository servicers	23		23
Total	44	%	44	%

Compared with depository financial institutions, our non-depository servicers pose additional risks because they may not have the same financial strength or operational capacity, or be subject to the same level of regulatory oversight as depository financial institutions.

The table below displays the percentage of our multifamily guaranty book of business serviced by our top five multifamily mortgage servicers, and identifies two servicers that serviced 10% or more of our multifamily guaranty book of business based on unpaid principal balance.


	Percentage of Multifamily Guaranty Book of Business
	As of
	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Walker & Dunlop, LLC	13	%	12	%
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with its affiliates)	11		11
Remaining top five servicers	24		24
Total	48	%	47	%

If a significant mortgage servicer or seller counterparty, or a number of mortgage servicers or sellers, fails to meet their obligations to us, it could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We mitigate these risks in several ways, including:

•establishing minimum standards and financial requirements for our servicers;

•monitoring financial and portfolio performance as compared with peers and internal benchmarks; and

•for our largest mortgage servicers, conducting periodic financial reviews to confirm compliance with servicing guidelines and servicing performance expectations.

We may take one or more of the following actions to mitigate our credit exposure to mortgage servicers that present a higher risk:

•require a guaranty of obligations by higher-rated entities;

•transfer exposure to third parties;

•require collateral;

•establish more stringent financial requirements;

•work with underperforming servicers to improve operational processes; and

•suspend or terminate the selling and servicing relationship if deemed necessary.

Derivatives Counterparties. For information on credit risk associated with our derivative transactions and repurchase agreements see “Note 8, Derivative Instruments” and “Note 11, Netting Arrangements.”


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						112


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Netting Arrangements

11. Netting Arrangements

We use master netting arrangements, which allow us to offset certain financial instruments and collateral with the same counterparty, to minimize counterparty credit exposure. The tables below display information related to derivatives, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that are either offset or not offset in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.


	As of June 30, 2022
			Gross Amount Offset(1)		Net Amount Presented in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets				Amounts Not Offset in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
	Gross Amount								Financial Instruments(2)			Collateral(3)			Net Amount
	(Dollars in millions)
Assets:
OTC risk management derivatives	$	195	$	59		$	254			$	—		$	—	$	254
Cleared risk management derivatives	—		4			4				—			—		4
Mortgage commitment derivatives	631		—			631				(461)			—		170
Total derivative assets	826		63			889		(4)		(461)			—		428
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(5)	49,191		—			49,191				—			(49,191)		—
Total assets	$	50,017	$	63		$	50,080			$	(461)		$	(49,191)	$	428
Liabilities:
OTC risk management derivatives	$	(3,619)	$	3,619		$	—			$	—		$	—	$	—
Cleared risk management derivatives	—		(79)			(79)				—			79		—
Mortgage commitment derivatives	(498)		—			(498)				461			—		(37)
Total derivative liabilities	(4,117)		3,540			(577)		(4)		461			79		(37)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(6)	(1,466)		—			(1,466)				—			1,461		(5)
Total liabilities	$	(5,583)	$	3,540		$	(2,043)			$	461		$	1,540	$	(42)


	As of December 31, 2021
			Gross Amount Offset(1)		Net Amount Presented in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets					Amounts Not Offset in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
	Gross Amount								Financial Instruments(2)				Collateral(3)			Net Amount
	(Dollars in millions)
Assets:
OTC risk management derivatives	$	239	$	(237)		$	2				$	—		$	—		$	2
Cleared risk management derivatives	—		—			—					—			—			—
Mortgage commitment derivatives	169		—			169					(133)			—			36
Total derivative assets	408		(237)			171		(4)			(133)			—			38
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(5)	64,843		—			64,843					—			(64,843)			—
Total assets	$	65,251	$	(237)		$	65,014				$	(133)		$	(64,843)		$	38
Liabilities:
OTC risk management derivatives	$	(1,188)	$	1,183		$	(5)				$	—		$	—		$	(5)
Cleared risk management derivatives	—		(10)			(10)					—			10			—
Mortgage commitment derivatives	(197)		—			(197)					133			56			(8)


Total liabilities	$	(1,385)	$	1,173		$	(212)	(4)			$	133		$	66		$	(13)

(1)Represents the effect of the right to offset under legally enforceable master netting arrangements to settle with the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and received and accrued interest.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						113


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Netting Arrangements

(2)Mortgage commitment derivative amounts reflect where we have recognized both an asset and a liability with the same counterparty under an enforceable master netting arrangement but we have not elected to offset the related amounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(3)Represents collateral received that has not been recognized and not offset in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, as well as collateral posted which has been recognized but not offset in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Does not include collateral held or posted in excess of our exposure. The fair value of non-cash collateral we pledged which the counterparty was permitted to sell or repledge was $3.0 billion and $2.5 billion as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The fair value of non-cash collateral received was $49.2 billion and $64.9 billion, of which $26.6 billion and $25.6 billion could be sold or repledged as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. None of the underlying collateral was sold or repledged as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

(4)Excludes derivative assets of $3 million as of June 30, 2022 and derivative liabilities of $45 million and $21 million recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, that were not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements. We had no derivative assets recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 that were not subject to enforceable master netting arrangements.

(5)Includes $28.7 billion and $29.1 billion in securities purchased under agreements to resell classified as “Cash and cash equivalents” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Includes $5.1 billion and $15.0 billion in securities purchased under agreements to resell classified as “Restricted cash and cash equivalents” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

(6)Represents agreements to repurchase securities for a specified price, with repayment generally occurring on the following day, reported as “Other liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Derivative instruments are recorded at fair value and securities purchased under agreements to resell are recorded at amortized cost in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. For a discussion of how we determine our rights to offset the assets and liabilities presented above with the same counterparty, including collateral posted or received, see “Note 14, Netting Arrangements” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

12. Fair Value

We use fair value measurements for the initial recording of certain assets and liabilities and periodic remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis.

Fair Value Measurement

Fair value measurement guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and sets forth disclosures around fair value measurements. This guidance applies whenever other accounting guidance requires or permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority, Level 1, to measurements based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The next highest priority, Level 2, is given to measurements of assets and liabilities based on limited observable inputs or observable inputs for similar assets and liabilities. The lowest priority, Level 3, is given to measurements based on unobservable inputs.

We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. See “Note 15, Fair Value” in our 2021 Form 10-K for information on the valuation control processes and the valuation techniques we use for fair value measurement and disclosure as well as our basis for classifying these measurements as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy in more specific situations. If the inputs used to measure assets or liabilities at fair value change, it may also result in a change in classification between levels 1, 2, and 3. We made no material changes to the valuation control processes or the valuation techniques for the six months ended June 30, 2022.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						114


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value

Recurring Changes in Fair Value

The following tables display our assets and liabilities measured in our condensed consolidated balance sheets at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition, including instruments for which we have elected the fair value option.


	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2022
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment(1)			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Assets:

Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae		$	—		$	1,219		$	76		$	—		$	1,295
Other agency		—			2,508			—			—			2,508
Other securities		—			112			—			—			112



Non-mortgage-related securities(3)		60,883			13			—			—			60,896
Total trading securities		60,883			3,852			76			—			64,811
Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae		—			54			404			—			458
Other agency		—			10			—			—			10



Other securities		—			8			289			—			297
Total available-for-sale securities		—			72			693			—			765
Mortgage loans		—			3,472			599			—			4,071
Other assets:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			—			35			—			35
Swaptions		—			160			—			—			160
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			63			63
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			631			—			—			631
Credit enhancement derivatives		—			—			3			—			3
Total other assets		—			791			38			63			892
Total assets at fair value		$	60,883		$	8,187		$	1,406		$	63		$	70,539

Liabilities:
Long-term debt:


Of Fannie Mae		$	—		$	1,613		$	253		$	—		$	1,866

Of consolidated trusts		—			18,266			152			—			18,418
Total long-term debt		—			19,879			405			—			20,284
Other liabilities:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			3,583			—			—			3,583
Swaptions		—			36			—			—			36
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(3,540)			(3,540)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			498			—			—			498
Credit enhancement derivatives		—			—			45			—			45
Total other liabilities		—			4,117			45			(3,540)			622
Total liabilities at fair value		$	—		$	23,996		$	450		$	(3,540)		$	20,906


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						115


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value


	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment(1)			Estimated Fair Value
		(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Assets:
Cash equivalents, including restricted cash equivalents(2)		$	250		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	250
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae		—			1,519			57			—			1,576
Other agency		—			2,893			—			—			2,893
Other securities		—			137			—			—			137



Non-mortgage-related securities(3)		83,581			19			—			—			83,600
Total trading securities		83,581			4,568			57			—			88,206
Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae		—			64			431			—			495
Other agency		—			12			—			—			12



Other securities		—			8			322			—			330
Total available-for-sale securities		—			84			753			—			837
Mortgage loans		—			4,209			755			—			4,964
Other assets:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			25			152			—			177
Swaptions		—			62			—			—			62
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(237)			(237)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			169			—			—			169

Total other assets		—			256			152			(237)			171
Total assets at fair value		$	83,831		$	9,117		$	1,717		$	(237)		$	94,428

Liabilities:
Long-term debt:


Of Fannie Mae		$	—		$	2,008		$	373		$	—		$	2,381

Of consolidated trusts		—			21,640			95			—			21,735
Total long-term debt		—			23,648			468			—			24,116
Other liabilities:
Risk management derivatives:
Swaps		—			1,165			—			—			1,165
Swaptions		—			23			—			—			23
Netting adjustment		—			—			—			(1,173)			(1,173)
Mortgage commitment derivatives		—			197			—			—			197
Credit enhancement derivatives		—			—			21			—			21
Total other liabilities		—			1,385			21			(1,173)			233
Total liabilities at fair value		$	—		$	25,033		$	489		$	(1,173)		$	24,349

(1)Derivative contracts are reported on a gross basis by level. The netting adjustment represents the effect of the legal right to offset under legally enforceable master netting arrangements to settle with the same counterparty on a net basis, including cash collateral posted and received.

(2)Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents are composed of U.S. Treasuries that have a maturity at the date of acquisition of three months or less.

(3)Primarily includes U.S. Treasury securities.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						116


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value

The following tables display a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The tables also display gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both realized and unrealized gains and losses, recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for Level 3 assets and liabilities.


	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
			Total Gains (Losses) (Realized/Unrealized)																			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2022(4)(5)		Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in OCI Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2022(1)
	Balance, March 31, 2022		Included in Net Income			Included in Total OCI (Loss)(1)		Purchases(2)		Sales(2)		Issues(3)		Settlements(3)		Transfers out of Level 3		Transfers into Level 3		Balance, June 30, 2022
	(Dollars in millions)
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	47	$	(2)		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(1)	$	(5)	$	37	$	76	$	(1)	$	—


Total trading securities	$	47	$	(2)	(5)(6)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(1)	$	(5)	$	37	$	76	$	(1)	$	—

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	418	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(14)	$	—	$	—	$	404	$	—	$	(1)



Other securities	309		—			(1)		—		—		—		(19)		—		—		289		—		(1)
Total available-for-sale securities	$	727	$	—	(6)(7)	$	(1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(33)	$	—	$	—	$	693	$	—	$	(2)

Mortgage loans	$	668	$	(23)	(5)(6)	$	—	$	—	$	(2)	$	—	$	(41)	$	(16)	$	13	$	599	$	(23)	$	—
Net derivatives	57		(75)		(5)	—		—		—		—		11		—		—		(7)		(64)		—

Long-term debt:

Of Fannie Mae	$	(307)	$	54	(5)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(253)	$	54	$	—
Of consolidated trusts	(161)		—		(5)(6)	—		—		—		—		9		—		—		(152)		1		—
Total long-term debt	$	(468)	$	54		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	9	$	—	$	—	$	(405)	$	55	$	—


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						117


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value


	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
			Total Gains (Losses) (Realized/Unrealized)																			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2022(4)(5)		Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in OCI Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2022(1)
	Balance, December 31, 2021		Included in Net Income			Included in Total OCI (Loss)(1)		Purchases(2)		Sales(2)		Issues(3)		Settlements(3)		Transfers out of Level 3		Transfers into Level 3		Balance, June 30, 2022
	(Dollars in millions)
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	57	$	(8)		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(1)	$	(14)	$	42	$	76	$	(3)	$	—


Total trading securities	$	57	$	(8)	(5)(6)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(1)	$	(14)	$	42	$	76	$	(3)	$	—

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	431	$	1		$	(4)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(24)	$	—	$	—	$	404	$	—	$	(3)



Other securities	322		(8)			(2)		—		—		—		(22)		(2)		1		289		—		(2)
Total available-for-sale securities	$	753	$	(7)	(6)(7)	$	(6)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(46)	$	(2)	$	1	$	693	$	—	$	(5)

Mortgage loans	$	755	$	(48)	(5)(6)	$	—	$	—	$	(2)	$	—	$	(82)	$	(60)	$	36	$	599	$	(42)	$	—
Net derivatives	131		(157)		(5)	—		—		—		—		19		—		—		(7)		(138)		—

Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	$	(373)	$	120	(5)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(253)	$	120	$	—
Of consolidated trusts	(95)		2		(5)(6)	—		—		—		(86)		27		1		(1)		(152)		3		—
Total long-term debt	$	(468)	$	122		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(86)	$	27	$	1	$	(1)	$	(405)	$	123	$	—


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						118


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value


	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
			Total Gains (Losses) (Realized/Unrealized)																			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2021(4)(5)		Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in OCI Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2021(1)
	Balance, March 31, 2021		Included in Net Income			Included in Total OCI (Loss)(1)		Purchases(2)		Sales(2)		Issues(3)		Settlements(3)		Transfers out of Level 3		Transfers into Level 3		Balance, June 30, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	109	$	(4)		$	—	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(32)	$	65	$	141	$	1	$	—


Total trading securities	$	109	$	(4)	(5)(6)	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(32)	$	65	$	141	$	1	$	—

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	189	$	1		$	5	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(4)	$	(107)	$	—	$	84	$	—	$	3



Other securities	422		4			(1)		—		—		—		(57)		—		—		368		—		1
Total available-for-sale securities	$	611	$	5	(6)(7)	$	4	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(61)	$	(107)	$	—	$	452	$	—	$	4

Mortgage loans	$	820	$	21	(5)(6)	$	—	$	85	$	(44)	$	—	$	(53)	$	(29)	$	32	$	832	$	22	$	—
Net derivatives	166		7		(5)	—		—		—		—		21		—		—		194		28		—

Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	$	(382)	$	(15)	(5)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(397)	$	(15)	$	—
Of consolidated trusts	(58)		—		(5)(6)	—		—		—		—		4		—		(1)		(55)		—		—
Total long-term debt	$	(440)	$	(15)		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	(1)	$	(452)	$	(15)	$	—


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						119


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value


	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
			Total Gains (Losses) (Realized/Unrealized)																			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2021(4)(5)		Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in OCI Related to Assets and Liabilities Still Held as of June 30, 2021(1)
	Balance, December 31, 2020		Included in Net Income			Included in Total OCI (Loss)(1)		Purchases(2)		Sales(2)		Issues(3)		Settlements(3)		Transfers out of Level 3		Transfers into Level 3		Balance, June 30, 2021
	(Dollars in millions)
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	94	$	(5)		$	—	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(39)	$	88	$	141	$	2	$	—
Other agency	1		—			—		—		—		—		—		(1)		—		—		—		—

Total trading securities	$	95	$	(5)	(5)(6)	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(40)	$	88	$	141	$	2	$	—

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related:
Fannie Mae	$	195	$	1		$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(7)	$	(107)	$	—	$	84	$	—	$	3



Other securities	453		7			—		—		—		—		(92)		—		—		368		—		4
Total available-for-sale securities	$	648	$	8	(6)(7)	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(99)	$	(107)	$	—	$	452	$	—	$	7

Mortgage loans	$	861	$	29	(5)(6)	$	—	$	85	$	(44)	$	—	$	(100)	$	(52)	$	53	$	832	$	28	$	—
Net derivatives	333		(125)		(5)	—		—		—		—		(14)		—		—		194		(139)		—

Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	$	(416)	$	19	(5)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(397)	$	19	$	—
Of consolidated trusts	(83)		1		(5)(6)	—		—		—		—		8		20		(1)		(55)		—		—
Total long-term debt	$	(499)	$	20		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8	$	20	$	(1)	$	(452)	$	19	$	—

(1)Gains (losses) included in “Other comprehensive loss” are included in “Changes in unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments and taxes” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

(2)Purchases and sales include activity related to the consolidation and deconsolidation of assets of securitization trusts.

(3)Issues and settlements include activity related to the consolidation and deconsolidation of liabilities of securitization trusts.

(4)Amount represents temporary changes in fair value. Amortization, accretion and the impairment of credit losses are not considered unrealized and are not included in this amount.

(5)Gains (losses) are included in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

(6)Gains (losses) included in “Net interest income” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income includes amortization of cost basis adjustments.

(7)Gains (losses) are included in “Investment gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						120


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value

The following tables display valuation techniques and the range and the weighted average of significant unobservable inputs for our Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding instruments for which we have elected the fair value option. Changes in these unobservable inputs can result in significantly higher or lower fair value measurements of these assets and liabilities as of the reporting date.


	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2022
	Fair Value		Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs(1)	Range(1)			Weighted - Average(1)(2)
	(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency(3)	$	76	Various



Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency(3)	367		Consensus
	37		Various

Total agency	404






Other securities	153		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	258.0	-	565.0	549.9
	91		Single Vendor
	45		Various
Total other	289
Total available-for-sale securities	$	693

Net derivatives	$	35	Dealer Mark
	(42)		Discounted Cash Flow
Total net derivatives	$	(7)


	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021
	Fair Value		Significant Valuation Techniques	Significant Unobservable Inputs(1)	Range(1)			Weighted - Average(1)(2)
	(Dollars in millions)
Recurring fair value measurements:
Trading securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency(3)	$	57	Various

Available-for-sale securities:
Mortgage-related securities:
Agency(3)	379		Consensus
	52		Various
Total agency	431











Other securities	175		Discounted Cash Flow	Spreads (bps)	409.0	-	443.0	422.0
	94		Single Vendor	Spreads (bps)	9.3	-	49.4	27.2
	53		Various
Total other	322
Total available-for-sale securities	$	753

Net derivatives	$	152	Dealer Mark
	(21)		Discounted Cash Flow
Total net derivatives	$	131

(1)Valuation techniques for which no unobservable inputs are disclosed generally reflect the use of third-party pricing services or dealers, and the range of unobservable inputs applied by these sources is not readily available or cannot be reasonably estimated. Where we have disclosed unobservable inputs for consensus and single vendor techniques, those inputs are based on our validations performed at the security level using discounted cash flows.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						121


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value

(2)Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the instruments.

(3)Includes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities.

In our condensed consolidated balance sheets, certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when we evaluate loans for impairment). We had no Level 1 assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021. We held $226 million and $38 million in Level 2 assets as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, composed of mortgage loans held for sale that were impaired. We had no Level 2 liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

The following table displays valuation techniques for our Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.


		Fair Value Measurements as of
	Valuation Techniques	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
		(Dollars in millions)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:
Mortgage loans:(1)
Mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value	Consensus	$	1,818	$	201
	Single Vendor	951		1,383

Total mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value		2,769		1,584

Single-family mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost	Internal Model	1,072		867


Multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost	Appraisal	8		37

	Broker Price Opinion	50		118
	Internal Model	7		23
Total multifamily mortgage loans held for investment, at amortized cost		65		178

Acquired property, net:
Single-family	Accepted Offer	14		13
	Appraisal	73		73
	Internal Model	85		75
	Walk Forward	55		37
	Various	4		11
Total single-family		231		209

Multifamily	Various	16		34

Total nonrecurring assets at fair value		$	4,153	$	2,872

(1)When we measure impairment, including recoveries, based on the fair value of the loan or the underlying collateral and impairment is recorded on any component of the mortgage loan, including accrued interest receivable and amounts due from the borrower for advances of taxes and insurance, we present the entire fair value measurement amount with the corresponding mortgage loan.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						122


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table displays the carrying value and estimated fair value of our financial instruments. The fair value of financial instruments we disclose includes commitments to purchase multifamily and single-family mortgage loans that we do not record in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of these commitments are included as “Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses.” The disclosure excludes all non-financial instruments; therefore, the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities does not represent the underlying fair value of our total consolidated assets and liabilities.


	As of June 30, 2022
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment			Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash and cash equivalents	$	75,942	$	42,142		$	33,800		$	—		$	—		$	75,942
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	15,391		—			15,391			—			—			15,391
Trading securities	64,811		60,883			3,852			76			—			64,811
Available-for-sale securities	765		—			72			693			—			765
Mortgage loans held for sale	4,579		—			643			4,200			—			4,843
Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses	4,087,352		—			3,557,672			180,362			—			3,738,034
Advances to lenders	4,622		—			4,622			—			—			4,622
Derivative assets at fair value	892		—			791			38			63			892
Guaranty assets and buy-ups	85		—			—			173			—			173
Total financial assets	$	4,254,439	$	103,025		$	3,616,843		$	185,542		$	63		$	3,905,473

Financial liabilities:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	1,466	$	—		$	1,466		$	—		$	—		$	1,466
Short-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	7,590		—			7,589			—			—			7,589

Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	136,865		—			137,063			604			—			137,667
Of consolidated trusts	4,064,192		—			3,663,125			36,785			—			3,699,910
Derivative liabilities at fair value	622		—			4,117			45			(3,540)			622
Guaranty obligations	94		—			—			78			—			78
Total financial liabilities	$	4,210,829	$	—		$	3,813,360		$	37,512		$	(3,540)		$	3,847,332


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						123


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value


	As of December 31, 2021
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Netting Adjustment	Estimated Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash and cash equivalents	$	108,631	$	64,531		$	44,100		$	—			$	—	$	108,631
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	20,743		—			20,743			—				—		20,743
Trading securities	88,206		83,581			4,568			57				—		88,206
Available-for-sale securities	837		—			84			753				—		837
Mortgage loans held for sale	5,134		—			178			5,307				—		5,485
Mortgage loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses	3,963,108		—			3,796,917			209,090				—		4,006,007
Advances to lenders	8,414		—			8,413			1				—		8,414
Derivative assets at fair value	171		—			256			152				(237)		171
Guaranty assets and buy-ups	92		—			—			207				—		207
Total financial assets	$	4,195,336	$	148,112		$	3,875,259		$	215,567			$	(237)	$	4,238,701

Financial liabilities:

Short-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	$	2,795	$	—		$	2,795		$	—			$	—	$	2,795

Long-term debt:
Of Fannie Mae	198,097		—			205,142			799				—		205,941
Of consolidated trusts	3,957,299		—			3,951,537			32,644				—		3,984,181
Derivative liabilities at fair value	233		—			1,385			21				(1,173)		233
Guaranty obligations	101		—			—			101				—		101
Total financial liabilities	$	4,158,525	$	—		$	4,160,859		$	33,565			$	(1,173)	$	4,193,251

For a detailed description and classification of our financial instruments, see “Note 15, Fair Value” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Fair Value Option

We elected the fair value option for loans and debt that contain embedded derivatives that would otherwise require bifurcation. Under the fair value option, we elected to carry these instruments at fair value instead of bifurcating the embedded derivative from such instruments.

Interest income for the mortgage loans is recorded in “Interest income: Mortgage loans” and interest expense for the debt instruments is recorded in “Interest expense: Long-term debt” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						124


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Fair Value

The following table displays the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the financial instruments for which we have made fair value elections.


	As of
	June 30, 2022									December 31, 2021
	Loans(1)			Long-Term Debt of Fannie Mae			Long-Term Debt of Consolidated Trusts			Loans(1)			Long-Term Debt of Fannie Mae			Long-Term Debt of Consolidated Trusts
	(Dollars in millions)
Fair value		$	4,071		$	1,866		$	18,418		$	4,964		$	2,381		$	21,735
Unpaid principal balance		4,119			1,833			17,677			4,601			2,197			19,314

(1)Includes nonaccrual loans with a fair value of $52 million and $86 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Includes loans that are 90 days or more past due with a fair value of $72 million and $125 million as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Changes in Fair Value under the Fair Value Option Election

We recorded losses of $187 million and $378 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and losses of $5 million and gains of $20 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 from changes in the fair value of loans recorded at fair value in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

We recorded gains of $558 million and $1.6 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and losses of $89 million and gains of $284 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, from changes in the fair value of long-term debt recorded at fair value in “Fair value gains (losses), net” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

We are party to various types of legal actions and proceedings, including actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants. We also are subject to regulatory examinations, inquiries and investigations, and other information gathering requests. In some of the matters, indeterminate amounts are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. This variability in pleadings, together with our and our counsel’s actual experience in litigating or settling claims, leads us to conclude that the monetary relief that may be sought by plaintiffs bears little relevance to the merits or disposition value of claims.

We have substantial and valid defenses to the claims in the proceedings described below and intend to defend these matters vigorously. However, legal actions and proceedings of all types are subject to many uncertain factors that generally cannot be predicted with assurance. Accordingly, the outcome of any given matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular points in time is frequently difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how courts will apply the law. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel may view the evidence and applicable law.

On a quarterly basis, we review relevant information about all pending legal actions and proceedings for the purpose of evaluating and revising our contingencies, accruals and disclosures. We establish an accrual only for matters when a loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of such loss. We are often unable to estimate the possible losses or ranges of losses, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development, where plaintiffs seek indeterminate or unspecified damages, where there may be novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the proceedings, or where settlement negotiations have not occurred or progressed. Given the uncertainties involved in any action or proceeding, regardless of whether we have established an accrual, the ultimate resolution of certain of these matters may be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of our net income or loss for that period.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						125


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Commitments and Contingencies

In addition to the matters specifically described below, we are involved in a number of legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business that we do not expect will have a material impact on our business or financial condition.

Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation

A consolidated class action (“In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigations”) and a non-class action lawsuit, Fairholme Funds v. FHFA, filed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders against us, FHFA as our conservator, and Freddie Mac are pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, with trials scheduled to begin on October 17, 2022. The lawsuits challenge the August 2012 amendment to each company’s senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury

Plaintiffs in these lawsuits filed amended complaints on November 1, 2017 alleging that the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to the August 2012 amendments nullified certain of the shareholders’ rights, particularly the right to receive dividends. Plaintiffs seek damages, equitable and injunctive relief, and costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs in the class action represent a class of Fannie Mae preferred shareholders and classes of Freddie Mac common and preferred shareholders. On September 28, 2018, the court dismissed all of the plaintiffs’ claims except for their claims for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On March 21, 2022, we, FHFA and Freddie Mac filed a motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ remaining claim and plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment.

Given the stage of these lawsuits, the substantial and novel legal questions that remain, and our substantial defenses, we are currently unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss arising from this litigation.

14. Regulatory Capital Requirements

◦The prescribed leverage buffer amount (“PLBA”) represents the amount of tier 1 capital we are required to hold above the minimum tier 1 leverage capital requirement;

•Specific minimum percentages, or “floors,” on the risk-weights applicable to single-family and multifamily exposures, as well as retained portions of credit risk transfer transactions.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						126


			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements \| Regulatory Capital Requirements

The table below sets forth information about our capital requirements under the standardized approach of the enterprise regulatory capital framework. Available capital for purposes of the enterprise regulatory capital framework excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion) and other amounts specified in footnote 2 to the table. Because of these exclusions, we had a deficit in available capital as of June 30, 2022, even though we had positive net worth under GAAP of $56.4 billion as of June 30, 2022.

As of June 30, 2022, we had a $262 billion shortfall of our available capital (deficit) to the adjusted total capital requirement (including buffers) of $185 billion under the standardized approach of the rule as shown in the table below. As of June 30, 2022, our risk-based adjusted total capital requirement (including buffers) represented the amount of capital needed to be fully capitalized under the standardized approach to the rule.


Capital Metrics under the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework as of June 30, 2022(1)
(Dollars in billions)
Adjusted total assets		$	4,545
Risk-weighted assets		1,325

		Amounts						Ratios
		Available Capital (Deficit)(2)		Minimum Capital Requirement		Total Capital Requirement (including Buffers)(4)		Available Capital (Deficit) Ratio(3)		Minimum Capital Ratio Requirement		Total Capital Requirement Ratio (including Buffers)
Risk-based capital:
	Total capital(5)	$	(58)	$	106	$	106	(4.4)	%	8.0	%	8.0	%
	Common equity tier 1 capital	(96)		60		139		(7.2)		4.5		10.5
	Tier 1 capital	(77)		80		159		(5.8)		6.0		12.0
	Adjusted total capital	(77)		106		185		(5.8)		8.0		14.0
Leverage capital:
	Core capital(6)	(64)		114		114		(1.4)		2.5		2.5
	Tier 1 capital	(77)		114		137		(1.7)		2.5		3.0

(1)Ratios are calculated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets for risk-based capital metrics and as a percentage of adjusted total assets for leverage capital metrics.

(2)Available capital (deficit) for all line items excludes the stated value of the senior preferred stock ($120.8 billion). Available capital (deficit) for all line items except total capital and core capital also deducts a portion of deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences between GAAP and tax requirements are deducted from capital to the extent they exceed 10% of common equity. As of June 30, 2022, this resulted in the full deduction of deferred tax assets ($12.4 billion) from our available capital (deficit). Available capital (deficit) for common equity tier 1 capital also excludes the value of the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock ($19.1 billion).

(3)Ratios are negative because we had a deficit in available capital for each tier of capital.

(4)The applicable buffer for common equity tier 1 capital, tier 1 capital, and adjusted total capital is the PCCBA, comprised of a stress capital buffer, a stability capital buffer, and a countercyclical capital buffer. The applicable buffer for tier 1 capital (leverage based) is the PLBA. The stress capital buffer and countercyclical capital buffer are each calculated by multiplying prescribed factors by adjusted total assets as of the last day of the previous calendar quarter. The 2022 stability capital buffer is calculated by multiplying a factor determined based on our share of mortgage debt outstanding by adjusted total assets as of December 31, 2020. The prescribed leverage buffer for 2022 is set at 50% of the 2022 stability buffer. Going forward the stability buffer and the prescribed leverage buffer will be updated with an effective date that depends on whether the stability capital buffer increases or decreases relative to the previously calculated value.

As a result of our capital shortfall, our maximum payout ratio under the enterprise regulatory capital framework as of June 30, 2022 was 0%. While it is not applicable until we are required to comply with the capital requirements under the enterprise regulatory capital framework, our maximum payout ratio represents the percentage of eligible retained income that we are permitted to pay out in the form of distributions or discretionary bonus payments under the enterprise regulatory capital framework. The maximum payout ratio for a given quarter is the lowest of the payout ratios determined by our capital conservation buffer and our leverage buffer.


Fannie Mae (In conservatorship) Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						127


			Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Information about market risk is set forth in “MD&A—Risk Management—Market Risk Management, including Interest-Rate Risk Management.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Overview

We are required under applicable laws and regulations to maintain controls and procedures, which include disclosure controls and procedures as well as internal control over financial reporting, as further described below.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding our required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of June 30, 2022, the end of the period covered by this report. As a result of management’s evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of filing this report.

Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of filing this report because they did not adequately ensure the accumulation and communication to management of information known to FHFA that is needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws. As a result, we were not able to rely upon the disclosure controls and procedures that were in place as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of this filing, and we continue to have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness is described in more detail below under “Description of Material Weakness.” Based on discussions with FHFA and the structural nature of this material weakness, we do not expect to remediate this material weakness while we are under conservatorship.

Description of Material Weakness

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard 2201 defines a material weakness as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management has determined that we continued to have the following material weakness as of June 30, 2022 and as of the date of filing this report:

•Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have been under the conservatorship of FHFA since September 6, 2008. Under the GSE Act, FHFA is an independent agency that currently functions as both our conservator and our regulator with respect to our safety, soundness and mission. Because of the nature of the conservatorship under the GSE Act, which places us under the “control” of FHFA (as that term is defined by securities laws), some of the information that we may need to meet our disclosure obligations may be solely within the knowledge of FHFA. As our conservator, FHFA has the power to take actions without our knowledge that could be material to our shareholders and other stakeholders, and could significantly affect our financial performance or our continued existence as an ongoing business. Although we and FHFA attempted to design and implement


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						128


						Controls and Procedures

disclosure policies and procedures that would account for the conservatorship and accomplish the same objectives as a disclosure controls and procedures policy of a typical reporting company, there are inherent structural limitations on our ability to design, implement, test or operate effective disclosure controls and procedures. As both our regulator and our conservator under the GSE Act, FHFA is limited in its ability to design and implement a complete set of disclosure controls and procedures relating to Fannie Mae, particularly with respect to current reporting pursuant to Form 8-K. Similarly, as a regulated entity, we are limited in our ability to design, implement, operate and test the controls and procedures for which FHFA is responsible.

Due to these circumstances, we have not been able to update our disclosure controls and procedures in a manner that adequately ensures the accumulation and communication to management of information known to FHFA that is needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws, including disclosures affecting our condensed consolidated financial statements. As a result, we did not maintain effective controls and procedures designed to ensure complete and accurate disclosure as required by GAAP as of June 30, 2022 or as of the date of filing this report. Based on discussions with FHFA and the structural nature of this weakness, we do not expect to remediate this material weakness while we are under conservatorship.

Mitigating Actions Related to Material Weakness

As described above under “Description of Material Weakness,” we continue to have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to our disclosure controls and procedures. However, we and FHFA have engaged in the following practices intended to permit accumulation and communication to management of information needed to meet our disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws:

•FHFA has established the Division of Conservatorship Oversight and Readiness, which is intended to facilitate operation of the company with the oversight of the conservator.

•We have provided drafts of our SEC filings to FHFA personnel for their review and comment prior to filing. We also have provided drafts of external press releases, statements and speeches to FHFA personnel for their review and comment prior to release.

•FHFA personnel, including senior officials, have reviewed our SEC filings prior to filing, including this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2022 (“Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q”), and engaged in discussions regarding issues associated with the information contained in those filings. Prior to filing our Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q, FHFA provided Fannie Mae management with written acknowledgment that it had reviewed the Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q, and it was not aware of any material misstatements or omissions in the Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q and had no objection to our filing the Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q.

•Our senior management meets regularly with senior leadership at FHFA, including, but not limited to, the Director.

•FHFA representatives attend meetings frequently with various groups within the company to enhance the flow of information and to provide oversight on a variety of matters, including accounting, credit and market risk management, external communications and legal matters.

•Senior officials within FHFA’s Office of the Chief Accountant have met frequently with our senior finance executives regarding our accounting policies, practices and procedures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, whether any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 that management believes have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

In the ordinary course of business, we review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes that we believe will improve these controls and increase efficiency, while continuing to ensure that we maintain effective internal controls. Changes may include implementing new, more efficient systems, automating manual processes and updating existing systems.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						129


						Other Information

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information in this item supplements and updates information regarding certain legal proceedings set forth in “Legal Proceedings” in our 2021 Form 10-K and our First Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q. We also provide information regarding material legal proceedings in “Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies,” which is incorporated herein by reference. In addition to the matters specifically described or incorporated by reference in this item, we are involved in legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business that we do not expect will have a material impact on our business or financial condition. However, litigation claims and proceedings of all types are subject to many factors and their outcome and effect on our business and financial condition generally cannot be predicted accurately.

We establish an accrual for legal claims only when a loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of such loss. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those claims. If certain of these matters are determined against us, FHFA or Treasury, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, including our net worth.

Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements Litigation

Since June 2013, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed lawsuits in multiple federal courts against one or more of the United States, Treasury and FHFA, challenging actions taken by the defendants relating to the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac senior preferred stock purchase agreements and the conservatorships of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Some of these lawsuits also contain claims against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The legal claims being advanced by one or more of these lawsuits include challenges to the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to August 2012 amendments to the agreements, the payment of dividends to Treasury under the net worth sweep dividend provisions, and FHFA’s decision to require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to draw funds from Treasury to pay dividends to Treasury prior to the August 2012 amendments. The plaintiffs seek various forms of equitable and injunctive relief as well as damages. The cases that remain pending after March 31, 2022 are as follows:

District of Columbia (In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigations and Fairholme Funds v. FHFA). Fannie Mae is a defendant in two cases pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, including a consolidated class action. In both cases, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stockholders filed amended complaints on November 1, 2017 against us, FHFA as our conservator and Freddie Mac. On September 28, 2018, the court dismissed all the plaintiffs’ claims in these cases, except for their claims for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Trials in these cases are scheduled to begin on October 17, 2022. Both cases are described in “Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies.”

Southern District of Texas (Collins, et al. v. Yellen, et al.). On October 20, 2016, preferred and common stockholders filed a complaint against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. On May 22, 2017, the court dismissed the case. On September 6, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed the district court’s dismissal of claims against Treasury, but reversed the dismissal of claims against FHFA.

On June 23, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court held that FHFA did not exceed its statutory powers as conservator when it agreed to the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the third amendment to the senior preferred stock purchase agreements in August 2012. The court also held that the provision of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 that restricts the President’s power to remove the FHFA Director without cause violates the Constitution’s separation of powers and, thus, the FHFA Director may be removed by the President for any reason. The court rejected plaintiffs’ request to rescind the third amendment to the senior preferred stock purchase agreements. However, the Supreme Court remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit for further proceedings on the sole issue of whether the stockholders suffered compensable harm related to the constitutional claim during the limited time-period when a Senate-confirmed FHFA Director was in office. On March 4, 2022, the Fifth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings on the compensable harm issue. On June 3, 2022, the stockholders filed an amended complaint and on July 18, 2022, FHFA and Treasury moved to dismiss that complaint.

Western District of Michigan (Rop et al. v. FHFA et al.). On June 1, 2017, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. FHFA and Treasury moved to dismiss the case on September 8, 2017, and plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on October 6, 2017. On September 8, 2020, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on October 27, 2020 and the case remains pending before that court.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						130


						Other Information

District of Minnesota (Bhatti et al. v. FHFA et al.). On June 22, 2017, preferred and common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The court dismissed the case on July 6, 2018. On October 6, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s ruling and remanded the case to the district court to determine whether the stockholders suffered compensable harm and are entitled to retrospective relief. On January 26, 2022, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On March 11 and March 14, 2022, Treasury and FHFA each filed motions to dismiss the new complaint.

Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Wazee Street Opportunities Fund IV L.P. et al. v. FHFA et al.). On August 16, 2018, common stockholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against FHFA and Treasury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. FHFA and Treasury moved to dismiss the case on November 16, 2018, and plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on December 21, 2018. This case is currently stayed.

U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Numerous cases are pending against the United States in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Fannie Mae is a nominal defendant in four of these cases: Fisher v. United States of America, filed on December 2, 2013; Rafter v. United States of America, filed on August 14, 2014; Perry Capital LLC v. United States of America, filed on August 15, 2018; and Fairholme Funds Inc. v. United States, which was originally filed on July 9, 2013, and amended publicly to include Fannie Mae as a nominal defendant on October 2, 2018. Plaintiffs in these cases allege that the net worth sweep dividend provisions of the senior preferred stock that were implemented pursuant to the August 2012 amendment constitute a taking of Fannie Mae’s property without just compensation in violation of the U.S. Constitution. The Fisher plaintiffs are pursuing this claim derivatively on behalf of Fannie Mae, while the Rafter, Perry Capital and Fairholme Funds plaintiffs are pursuing the claim both derivatively and directly against the United States. Plaintiffs in Rafter also allege direct and derivative breach of contract claims against the government. The Perry Capital and Fairholme Funds plaintiffs allege similar breach of contract claims, as well as direct and derivative breach of fiduciary duty claims against the government. Plaintiffs in Fisher request just compensation to Fannie Mae in an unspecified amount. Plaintiffs in Rafter, Perry Capital and Fairholme Funds seek just compensation for themselves on their direct claims and payment of damages to Fannie Mae on their derivative claims. The United States filed a motion to dismiss the Fisher, Rafter and Fairholme Funds cases, as well as other cases where Fannie Mae is not a nominal defendant, on August 1, 2018. On December 6, 2019, the court entered an order in the Fairholme Funds case that granted the government’s motion to dismiss all the direct claims but denied the motion as to the derivative claims brought on behalf of Fannie Mae. On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed to hear the appeal of the court’s December 6, 2019 order. The Federal Circuit also agreed to hear appeals in cases where Fannie Mae is not a nominal defendant. In the Fisher case, the court denied the government’s motion to dismiss on May 8, 2020 and, on August 21, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied the Fisher plaintiffs’ request for interlocutory appeal. On February 22, 2022, in the Fairholme Funds case and other cases on appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ direct claims, but reversed the U.S. Court of Federal Claims’ ruling on plaintiffs’ derivative claims, holding that those claims should also be dismissed. On July 22, 2022, the plaintiffs in Fairholme Funds and plaintiffs in other cases where Fannie Mae is not a nominal defendant filed petitions with the Supreme Court seeking review of the Federal Circuit’s decision.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the information in this report, you should carefully consider the risks relating to our business that we identify in “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K. This section supplements and updates that discussion. Also refer to “MD&A—Risk Management,” “MD&A—Single-Family Business” and “MD&A—Multifamily Business” in our 2021 Form 10-K and in this report for more detailed descriptions of the primary risks to our business and how we seek to manage those risks.

The risks we face could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and net worth, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our past results or the results contemplated by any forward-looking statements we make. We believe the risks described in the sections of this report and our 2021 Form 10-K identified above are the most significant we face; however, these are not the only risks we face. We face additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial.

Our business and financial results are affected by general economic conditions, including home prices and employment trends, and changes in economic conditions or financial markets may materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

In general, a prolonged period of slow growth in the U.S. economy or any deterioration in general economic conditions or financial markets could materially adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition. Our business is significantly affected by the status of the U.S. economy, including home prices and employment trends, as


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						131


						Other Information

well as economic output levels, interest and inflation rates, and shifts in fiscal and monetary policies. As described in “MD&A—Key Market Economic Indicators” in this report, we currently expect that a modest recession is likely to occur beginning in the first quarter of 2023, resulting in an increase in the unemployment rate. We also expect slower home price growth in the second half of 2022 and in 2023, driven by elevated mortgage interest rates, a slowing economy and reduced affordability, and that some regions of the country may experience home price declines in the latter half of 2022.

In recent years, the Federal Reserve has purchased a significant amount of mortgage-backed securities issued by us, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. The Federal Reserve began to taper these purchases in November 2021 and concluded its asset purchase program in March 2022. In March 2022, the Federal Reserve stated that it would reinvest principal payments from its holdings of both agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities into agency mortgage-backed securities, and that it expected to begin reducing its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities. In May 2022, the Federal Reserve announced its plans to reduce its securities holdings over time by reinvesting principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities only to the extent those payments exceed monthly caps; the cap was initially set at $17.5 billion per month beginning on June 1, 2022, and it will increase to $35 billion per month in September 2022. The Federal Reserve has also raised the target range for the federal funds rate several times this year to address inflation, and we expect it to raise the target range further before the end of 2022. The strength in inflation also contributed to the sharp rise in mortgage rates since the first quarter, and mortgage rates may continue to rise. The increase in mortgage interest rates has already led to a slowdown in housing demand and a reduction in our business volume. Further rate increases and declines in housing demand would likely further reduce our business volume, demand for our mortgage-backed securities, and the pace of home price appreciation, which could adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition.

Global economic conditions can also adversely affect our business and financial results. Changes or volatility in market conditions resulting from deterioration in or uncertainty regarding global economic conditions can adversely affect the value of our assets, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, net worth and financial condition. Differing rates of economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic around the world along with continued dislocations in supply chains remain a concern for policy makers and financial markets. To the extent global economic conditions negatively affect the U.S. economy, they also could negatively affect the credit performance of the loans in our book of business.

Volatility or uncertainty in global or domestic political conditions also can significantly affect economic conditions and financial markets. Global or domestic political unrest also could affect economic growth and financial markets. For example, the Russian war in Ukraine and related economic sanctions imposed on Russia, as well as any further actions by Russia, the United States or others relating to this conflict, may further impact the global economy and financial markets, which could further increase inflationary pressure and interest rates, as well as negatively affect economic growth and result in disruptions in the financial markets. We describe in “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K the risks to our business posed by changes in interest rates and changes in spreads. In addition, future changes or disruptions in financial markets could significantly change the amount, mix and cost of funds we obtain, as well as our liquidity position.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Common Stock

Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the OTCQB, operated by OTC Markets Group Inc., under the ticker symbol “FNMA.”

Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities

Under the terms of our senior preferred stock purchase agreement with Treasury, we are prohibited from selling or issuing our equity interests without the prior written consent of Treasury except under limited circumstances, which are described in “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform—Treasury Agreements—Covenants under Treasury Agreements” in our 2021 Form 10-K. During the quarter ended June 30, 2022, we did not sell any equity securities.

Information about Certain Securities Issuances by Fannie Mae

Pursuant to SEC regulations, public companies are required to disclose certain information when they incur a material direct financial obligation or become directly or contingently liable for a material obligation under an off-balance sheet arrangement. The disclosure must be made in a current report on Form 8-K under Item 2.03 or, if the obligation is


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						132


						Other Information

incurred in connection with certain types of securities offerings, in prospectuses for that offering that are filed with the SEC.

Because the securities we issue are exempted securities under the Securities Act of 1933, we do not file registration statements or prospectuses with the SEC with respect to our securities offerings. To comply with the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K relating to the incurrence of material financial obligations, in accordance with a “no-action” letter we received from the SEC staff in 2004, we report our incurrence of these types of obligations in offering circulars or prospectuses (or supplements thereto) that we post on our website within the same time period that a prospectus for a non-exempt securities offering would be required to be filed with the SEC. To the extent we incur a material financial obligation that is not disclosed in this manner, we would file a Form 8-K if required to do so under applicable Form 8-K requirements.

The website address for disclosure about our debt securities is www.fanniemae.com/debtsearch. From this address, investors can access the offering circular and related supplements for debt securities offerings under Fannie Mae’s universal debt facility, including pricing supplements for individual issuances of debt securities.

Disclosure about our obligations pursuant to the MBS we issue, some of which may be off-balance sheet obligations, can be found at www.fanniemae.com/mbsdisclosure. From this address, investors can access information and documents about our MBS, including prospectuses and related prospectus supplements.

We are providing our website address solely for your information. Information appearing on our website is not incorporated into this report.

Our Purchases of Equity Securities

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the second quarter of 2022.

Dividend Restrictions

Our payment of dividends is subject to the following restrictions:

Restrictions Relating to Conservatorship. Our conservator announced on September 7, 2008 that we would not pay any dividends on the common stock or on any series of preferred stock, other than the senior preferred stock. In addition, FHFA’s regulations relating to conservatorship and receivership operations prohibit us from paying any dividends while in conservatorship unless authorized by the Director of FHFA. The Director of FHFA has directed us to make dividend payments on the senior preferred stock on a quarterly basis for every dividend period for which dividends were payable.

Restrictions Under Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and Senior Preferred Stock. The senior preferred stock purchase agreement prohibits us from declaring or paying any dividends on Fannie Mae equity securities (other than the senior preferred stock) without the prior written consent of Treasury. In addition, the provisions of the senior preferred stock provide for dividends each quarter through and including the capital reserve end date in the amount, if any, by which our net worth as of the end of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds an applicable capital reserve amount. The applicable capital reserve amount is the amount of adjusted total capital necessary for us to meet the capital requirements and buffers set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital framework. The capital reserve end date is defined as the last day of the second consecutive fiscal quarter during which we have had and maintained capital equal to, or in excess of, all of the capital requirements and buffers under the enterprise regulatory capital framework. After the capital reserve end date, the amount of quarterly dividends to Treasury will be equal to the lesser of any quarterly increase in our net worth and a 10% annual rate on the then-current liquidation preference of the senior preferred stock. As a result, our ability to retain earnings in excess of the capital requirements and buffers set forth in the enterprise regulatory capital framework will be limited. For more information on the terms of the senior preferred stock purchase agreement and senior preferred stock, see “Business—Conservatorship, Treasury Agreements and Housing Finance Reform” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Additional Restrictions Relating to Preferred Stock. Payment of dividends on our common stock is also subject to the prior payment of dividends on our preferred stock and our senior preferred stock. Payment of dividends on all outstanding preferred stock, other than the senior preferred stock, is also subject to the prior payment of dividends on the senior preferred stock.

Statutory Restrictions. Under the GSE Act, FHFA has authority to prohibit capital distributions, including payment of dividends, if we fail to meet our capital requirements. If FHFA classifies us as significantly undercapitalized, approval of the Director of FHFA is required for any dividend payment. Under the Charter Act and the GSE Act, we are not permitted to make a capital distribution if, after making the distribution, we would be undercapitalized. The Director of FHFA, however, may permit us to repurchase shares if the repurchase is made in connection with the issuance of additional shares or obligations in at least an equivalent amount and will reduce our financial obligations or otherwise improve our financial condition.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						133


						Other Information

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits listed below are being filed or furnished with or incorporated by reference into this report.


Item						Description
3.1						Fannie Mae Charter Act (12 U.S.C. § 1716 et seq.) as amended through July 25, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Fannie Mae’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, filed October 31, 2019.)
3.2						Fannie Mae Bylaws, as amended through January 29, 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Fannie Mae’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed February 14, 2019.)
31.1						Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
31.2						Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)
32.1						Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2						Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101. INS						Inline XBRL Instance Document* - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101. SCH						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*
101. CAL						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation*
101. DEF						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition*
101. LAB						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label*
101. PRE						Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation*
104						Cover Page Interactive Data File* (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

* The financial information contained in these Inline XBRL documents is unaudited.


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						134


						Signatures

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Federal National Mortgage Association

	By:	/s/ David C. Benson
		David C. Benson President and Interim Chief Executive Officer

Date: July 29, 2022


			By:			/s/ Chryssa C. Halley
						Chryssa C. Halley Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 29, 2022


Fannie Mae Second Quarter 2022 Form 10-Q						135