FERRELLGAS PARTNERS L P - Annual Report: 2006 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

 

Commission file numbers: 001-11331, 333-06693, 000-50182 and 000-50183

 

Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp.

Ferrellgas, L.P.

Ferrellgas Finance Corp.

(Exact name of registrants as specified in their charters)

 

 

Registrants’ telephone number, including area code:

(913) 661-1500

 

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Limited Partner Interests of Ferrellgas, L.P.

 

Common Stock of Ferrellgas Finance Corp.

 

 

Title of class

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are well-known seasoned issuers, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.:  Yes þ     No o

 

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp., Ferrellgas, L.P. and
Ferrellgas Finance Corp.:  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrants are not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.:
Large accelerated filer  þ     Accelerated filer  o     Non-accelerated filer  o

 

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp, Ferrellgas, L.P. and Ferrellgas Finance Corp.:
Large accelerated filer  o     Accelerated filer  o     Non-accelerated filer  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. and Ferrellgas, L.P.  Yes o     No þ

 

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. and Ferrellgas Finance Corp.  Yes þ     No o

 

The aggregate market value as of January 31, 2006, of Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.’s Common Units held by nonaffiliates of Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., based on the reported closing price of such units on the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was approximately $801,407,000. There is no aggregate market value of the common equity of Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp., Ferrellgas, L.P. and Ferrellgas Finance Corp. as their common equity is not sold or traded.

 

At August 31, 2006, the registrants had common units or shares of common stock outstanding as follows:

 

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

 

EACH OF FERRELLGAS PARTNERS FINANCE CORP. AND FERRELLGAS FINANCE CORP. MEET THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION I (1)(A) AND (B) OF FORM 10-K AND ARE THEREFORE, WITH RESPECT TO EACH SUCH REGISTRANT, FILING THIS FORM 10-K WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.

 

 

FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
FERRELLGAS PARTNERS FINANCE CORP.
FERRELLGAS, L.P.
FERRELLGAS FINANCE CORP.

2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

Table of Contents

 

 

Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership. Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and our activities are primarily conducted through our operating partnership, Ferrellgas, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. We are the sole limited partner of Ferrellgas, L.P. with an approximate 99% limited partner interest.

 

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context indicates otherwise:

 

 

Ferrellgas Partners is a holding entity that conducts no operations and has two direct subsidiaries, Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. and the operating partnership. Ferrellgas Partners’ only significant assets are its approximate 99% limited partnership interest in the operating partnership and its 100% equity interest in Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp.

 

The operating partnership was formed on April 22, 1994, and accounts for substantially all of our consolidated assets, sales and operating earnings, except for interest expense related to $268.0 million in the aggregate principal amount of 8.75% senior notes due 2012 co-issued by Ferrellgas Partners and Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp.

 

Our general partner performs all management functions for us and our subsidiaries and holds a 1% general partner interest in Ferrellgas Partners and an approximate 1% general partner interest in the operating partnership. The parent company of our general partner, Ferrell Companies, Inc., beneficially owns approximately 32% of our outstanding common units. Ferrell Companies is owned 100% by an employee stock ownership trust.

 

We file annual, quarterly, and other reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and download our SEC filings over the internet from several commercial document retrieval services as well as at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy our SEC filings at the SEC’s public reference room located at, 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information concerning the public reference room and any applicable copy charges. Because our common units are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, we also provide our SEC filings and particular other information to the New York Stock Exchange. You may obtain copies of these filings and such other information at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange located at 11 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005. In addition, our SEC filings are available on our website at www.ferrellgas.com at no cost as soon as reasonably practicable after our electronic filing or furnishing thereof with the SEC. Please note that any internet addresses provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are for

informational purposes only and are not intended to be hyperlinks. Accordingly, no information found or provided at such internet addresses is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein.

 

General

 

We are a leading distributor of propane and related equipment and supplies to customers primarily in the United States. We believe that we are the second largest marketer of propane in the United States, including the largest national provider of propane by portable tank exchange, as measured by our propane sales volumes in fiscal 2006.

 

We serve more than one million residential, industrial/commercial, portable tank exchange, agricultural, and other customers in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. Our operations primarily include the distribution and sale of propane and related equipment and supplies with concentrations in the Midwest, Southeast, Southwest and Northwest regions of the United States. Our propane distribution business consists principally of transporting propane purchased from third parties to propane distribution locations and then to tanks on customers’ premises or to portable propane tanks delivered to nationwide and local retailers. Our portable tank exchange operations, nationally branded under the name Blue Rhino, are conducted through a network of independent and partnership-owned distribution outlets.

 

In the residential and industrial/commercial markets, propane is primarily used for space heating, water heating and cooking. In the portable tank exchange market, propane is used primarily for outdoor cooking using gas grills. In the agricultural market, propane is primarily used for crop drying, space heating, irrigation and weed control. In addition, propane is used for a variety of industrial applications, including as an engine fuel which is burned in internal combustion engines that power vehicles and forklifts, and as a heating or energy source in manufacturing and drying processes.

 

In our past three fiscal years, we reported annual propane sales volumes of:

 

 

The decrease in propane sales volumes in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily due to customer conservation caused by higher commodity prices and warmer than normal temperatures. This decrease was partially offset by gallons acquired through acquisitions completed during fiscal 2005 and 2006, and continued tank exchange gallon growth. National average heating season temperatures (November through March), as reported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, were 11% warmer than normal during fiscal 2006 as compared to temperatures that were 6% warmer than normal in fiscal 2005.

 

Our History

 

We were formed in 1994 in connection with our initial public offering. Our operations began in 1939 as a single location propane distributor in Atchison, Kansas. Our initial growth largely resulted from small acquisitions in rural areas of eastern Kansas, northern and central Missouri, Iowa, western Illinois, southern Minnesota, South Dakota and Texas. Since 1986, we have acquired approximately 166 propane distributors. As of July 31, 2006, we distribute product to our propane customers from 846 propane distribution locations. See Item 2. “Properties” for more information about our propane distribution locations.

 

On April 20, 2004, an affiliate of our general partner acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Blue Rhino Corporation in an all cash merger, after which it converted Blue Rhino Corporation into a limited liability company, Blue Rhino LLC. On April 21, 2004, this affiliate contributed Blue Rhino LLC to our operating partnership, through a series of transactions. Blue Rhino LLC was thereafter merged with and into our operating partnership. As a result of this contribution, we have become the largest national provider of propane by portable tank exchange as well as a leading supplier of related propane and non-propane products to consumers through

many of the nation’s largest retailers. This contribution expanded our operations to all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada.

 

In July, 2005 we completed the sale of certain non-strategic storage and terminal assets of our operating partnership to an unrelated third party. These assets were sold for $144.0 million in cash, plus a post-closing payment for, among other things, accounts receivable and inventory. The operating partnership used the proceeds from this sale to retire a series of maturing fixed rate senior notes totaling $109.0 million, plus accrued interest. The remainder of the sale proceeds was used to reduce borrowings outstanding under our operating partnership’s bank credit facility. We recorded a gain in fiscal 2005 of approximately $97.0 million related to the sale of these operations. The assets, liabilities and results of these operations have been classified as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements. See Note E — Discontinued operations — of our consolidated financial statements for a further discussion.

 

Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy is to:

 

 

Achieving operating efficiencies through the utilization of our technology platforms.  

 

We developed and deployed a new technology platform to improve our routing and scheduling of customer deliveries, customer administration and operational workflow. We incurred capital expenditures of $64.8 million during the last five fiscal years related to the development and deployment of this technology initiative, including the purchase of computer hardware and software and the development of new software. These capital expenditures were funded primarily from net cash provided by operating activities.

 

During fiscal 2002 and 2003, we conducted pilot programs of this new technology initiative in limited geographic regions. In fiscal 2004, we began the full deployment of this new technology initiative to our retail propane distribution locations. Approximately one-third of this deployment was completed by the end of fiscal 2004 with the remainder completed in fiscal 2005 and the first month of fiscal 2006. We now operate virtually all of our retail propane distribution locations on this new technology platform.

 

Our new technology initiative has improved the routing and scheduling of our customer deliveries, customer administration and operational workflow for the retail sale and delivery of bulk propane. During fiscal 2006, the deployment of this new technology platform has allowed us to improve propane margins per gallon as a result of the enhanced controls over pricing attributable to this initiative. We also decreased certain operating expenses primarily due to personnel savings related to the deployment of this technology platform.

 

Capitalizing on our national presence and economies of scale.  

 

We believe our national presence of 846 propane distribution locations in the United States as of July 31, 2006 gives us advantages over our smaller competitors. These advantages include economies of scale in areas such as:

 

 

We believe that our national presence allows us to be one of the few propane distributors that can competitively serve commercial customers and portable tank exchange customers on a nationwide basis, including the ability to serve such propane customers through leading home-improvement centers, mass merchants, hardware, grocery and convenience stores. In addition, we believe that our national presence provides us opportunities to make acquisitions of other propane distribution companies that overlap with our existing operations, providing economies of scale and significant cost savings in these markets.

 

Additionally, we believe our recent, significant investments in technology give us a competitive advantage to operate more efficiently and effectively at a lower cost compared to most of our competitors. We do not believe that many of our competitors will be able to justify similar investments in the near term. Our technology advantage has resulted from significant investments made in our new retail propane distribution operating platform together with our state-of-the-art tank exchange operating platform. We believe that similar investments in technology require both a large scale and a national presence, such as ours, in order to generate sustainable operational savings to produce a sufficient return on investment. For this reason, we believe these two technology platforms provide us with an on-going competitive advantage.

 

Expanding our operations through disciplined acquisitions and internal growth.  

 

We expect to continue the expansion of our propane customer base through the acquisition of other propane distributors. We intend to concentrate on acquisition activities in geographical areas adjacent to our existing operations, and on a selected basis in areas that broaden our geographic coverage. We also intend to focus on acquisitions that can be efficiently combined with our existing propane operations to provide an attractive return on investment after taking into account the economies of scale and cost savings we anticipate will result from those combinations. Our goal is to improve the operations and profitability of the businesses we acquire by integrating them into our established national organization and leveraging our new state-of-the-art technology platforms to help reduce costs and enhance customer service. We believe that our enhanced operational synergies, improved customer service and ability to better track the financial performance of acquired operations provide us a distinct competitive advantage and better analysis as we consider future acquisition opportunities.

 

We believe that we are positioned to successfully compete for growth opportunities within our existing operating regions. Our efforts will be focused on adding density to our existing customer base, providing propane and complementary services to national accounts and other product offerings to existing customer relationships. We also intend to expand our propane distribution operations in fiscal 2007 into several areas to which we have not historically provided propane service. This continued expansion will give us new growth opportunities by leveraging the capabilities of our new operating platforms.

 

Aligning employee interests with our investors through significant employee ownership.  

 

In 1998, we established an employee benefit plan that we believe aligns the interests of our employees with those of our investors. Through the Ferrell Companies, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust, our employees beneficially own approximately 32% of our outstanding common units, allowing them to participate directly in our overall success. This plan is unique in the propane distribution industry and we believe that the entrepreneurial culture fostered by employee-ownership provides us with another distinct competitive advantage.

 

Distribution of Propane and Related Equipment and Supplies

 

Our propane distribution business consists principally of transporting propane purchased from third parties to our propane distribution locations and then to tanks on customers’ premises and to portable propane tanks. Our market areas for our residential and agricultural customers are generally rural, but also include urban areas for industrial applications. Our market area for our industrial/commercial and portable tank exchange customers is generally urban. We utilize marketing programs targeting both new and existing customers by emphasizing:

 

 

 

The distribution of propane to residential customers generally involves large numbers of small volume deliveries averaging approximately 200 gallons each. Our retail deliveries of propane are typically transported from our retail propane distribution locations to our customers by our fleet of bulk delivery trucks, which are generally fitted with a 3,000 gallon tank. Propane storage tanks located on our customers’ premises are then filled from these bulk delivery trucks. We also deliver propane to our industrial/commercial and portable tank exchange customers using our fleet of portable tank and portable tank exchange delivery trucks, truck tractors and portable tank exchange delivery trailers.

 

A substantial majority of our gross profit is derived from the distribution and sale of propane and related risk management activities. Gross profit from our propane distribution operations is derived primarily from five customer groups:

 

 

Our gross profit from the distribution of propane is primarily based on margins; the cents-per-gallon difference between our costs to purchase and distribute propane and the sale price we charge our customers. Our residential customers and portable tank exchange customers typically provide us a greater cent per gallon margin than our industrial/commercial, agricultural and other customers. Should wholesale propane prices decline in the future, our cent-per-gallon margin on the distribution of propane to our customers should increase in the short-term because customer prices have tended to change less rapidly than wholesale prices. Likewise, should the wholesale cost of propane continue to increase, our cent-per-gallon margin and profitability would likely be reduced, for the short-term, until customer prices could be increased.

 

Residential customers typically rent their storage tanks from their distributors. Approximately 75% of our residential customers rent their tanks from us. Our rental terms and the fire safety regulations in some states require rented bulk tanks to be filled only by the propane supplier owning the tank. The cost and inconvenience of switching bulk tanks helps minimize a customer’s tendency to switch suppliers of propane on the basis of minor variations in price, helping us minimize customer loss.

 

In addition, we generally lease tanks to independent distributors involved with our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange operations. Our owned and independent distributors provide portable tank exchange customers with a national delivery presence that is generally not available from our competitors.

 

Some of our retail propane distribution locations also conduct the retail sale of propane appliances and related parts and fittings, as well as other retail propane related services and consumer products. We also sell gas grills, patio heaters, fireplaces, garden accessories, mosquito traps and other outdoor products through Blue Rhino Global Sourcing, LLC.

 

In fiscal 2006, no one customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues.

 

Effect of Weather and Seasonality

 

Weather conditions have a significant impact on demand for propane for heating purposes. Accordingly, the propane volumes sold for this purpose are directly affected by the severity of winter weather in the regions we serve and can vary substantially from year to year. In any given region, sustained warmer-than-normal temperatures will tend to result in reduced propane use, while sustained colder-than-normal temperatures will tend to result in greater use.

The market for propane is seasonal because of increased demand during the winter months primarily for the purpose of providing heating in residential and commercial buildings. Consequently, our sales and operating profits are concentrated in our second and third fiscal quarters, which are during the winter heating season of November through March.

 

In addition, propane sales volume traditionally fluctuates from year to year in response to variations in weather, price and other factors. We believe that our broad geographic distribution helps us minimize exposure to regional weather and economic patterns. See additional information about how seasonality affects our debt to cash flow ratios and the payment of quarterly distributions in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.” During times of colder-than-normal winter weather, we have been able to take advantage of our large, efficient distribution network to avoid supply disruptions, thereby providing us a competitive advantage in the markets we serve.

 

Risk Management Activities

 

Our risk management activities primarily attempt to mitigate risks related to the purchase, storage and transport of propane. We generally purchase propane in the contract and spot markets from major domestic energy companies on a short-term basis. Our costs to purchase and distribute propane fluctuate with the movement of market prices. That fluctuation subjects us to potential price risk, which we attempt to minimize through the use of risk management activities.

 

Our risk management supply procurement and transportation activities overall objective is to to hedge exposures to product purchase price risk. These risk management activities include the use of energy commodity forward contracts, swaps and options traded on the over-the-counter financial markets and futures and options traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. These risk management activities are conducted primarily to offset the effect of market price fluctuations on propane inventory and purchase commitments and to mitigate the price risk on sale commitments to our customers and payment commitments to independent distributors. These transactions are accounted for at fair value in other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of partners capital.

 

Although not currently active, our risk management trading activities overall objective is to generate a profit which we then apply to offset our cost of product sold. When active, we purchase and sell derivatives to manage other risks associated with commodity prices. Our risk management trading activities utilize energy commodity forward contracts, options and swaps traded on the over-the-counter financial markets and futures and options traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange to manage and hedge our exposure to the volatility of floating commodity prices and to protect our inventory positions. Although these activities attempt to mitigate our commodity price risk, we do not attempt to qualify these transactions for hedge accounting treatment. These transactions are accounted for at fair value in our consolidated statements of earnings.

 

The results from our risk management activities are included in our discussions about our results of operations in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations” and “Item 7A — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

 

Through our supply procurement activities, we purchase propane primarily from major domestic energy companies. Supplies of propane from these sources have traditionally been readily available, although no assurance can be given that they will be readily available in the future. We may purchase and store inventories of propane to avoid delivery interruptions during the periods of increased demand and to take advantage of favorable commodity prices. As a result of our ability to buy large volumes of propane and utilize our national distribution system, we believe we are in position to achieve product cost savings and avoid shortages during periods of tight supply to an extent not generally available to other propane distributors. During fiscal 2006, British Petroleum (15%) and Enterprise Products, L.P. (13%) accounted for approximately 28% of our total propane purchases. However, because there are numerous alternative suppliers available, we do not believe it is reasonably possible that this supplier concentration could cause a near-term severe impact on our ability to procure propane. No other single supplier accounted for more than 10% of our total propane purchases during fiscal 2006. If supplies were interrupted or difficulties in obtaining alternative transportation were to arise, the cost of procuring replacement

supplies may materially increase. These transactions are accounted for at cost in cost of product sold in the consolidated statement of earnings.

 

A portion of our propane inventory is purchased under supply contracts that typically have a one-year term and a price that fluctuates based on the spot market prices. In order to limit overall price risk, we will enter into fixed price over-the-counter energy commodity forward and swap contracts that generally have terms of less than 24 months. We also use options and swaps to hedge a portion of our forecasted purchases for up to 24 months in the future.

 

We also incur risks related to the price and availability of propane during periods of much colder-than-normal weather, temporary supply shortages concentrated in certain geographic regions and commodity price distortions between geographic regions. We attempt to mitigate these risks through our transportation activities by utilizing our transport truck and railroad tank car fleet to distribute propane between supply or storage locations and propane distribution locations. The propane we sell to our customers is generally transported from natural gas processing plants and refineries, pipeline terminals and storage facilities to propane distribution locations or storage facilities by our leased railroad tank cars and our owned or leased highway transport trucks. We also use common carrier and owner-operated transport trucks during the peak delivery season in the winter months or to provide service in areas where economic considerations favor their use. We are also able to use a portion of our transport truck fleet during the spring and summer months to support propane sales volume related to our portable tank exchange customers.

 

Industry

 

Natural gas liquids are derived from petroleum products and are sold in compressed or liquefied form. Propane, the predominant natural gas liquid, is typically extracted from natural gas or separated during crude oil refining. Although propane is gaseous at normal pressures, it is compressed into liquid form at relatively low pressures for storage and transportation. Propane is a clean-burning energy source, recognized for its transportability and ease of use relative to alternative forms of stand-alone energy sources.

 

Based upon industry publications, propane accounts for approximately 3% to 4% of household energy consumption in the United States, a level which has remained relatively constant for the past two decades. Propane competes primarily with natural gas, electricity and fuel oil as an energy source principally on the basis of price, availability and portability. Propane serves as an alternative to natural gas in rural and urban areas where natural gas is unavailable or portability of product is required. Propane is generally more expensive than natural gas on an equivalent British Thermal Unit (“BTU”) basis in locations served by natural gas, although propane is often sold in such areas as a standby fuel for use during peak demands and during interruption in natural gas service. The expansion of natural gas into traditional propane markets has historically been inhibited by the capital costs required to expand distribution and pipeline systems. Although the extension of natural gas pipelines tends to displace propane distribution in the neighborhoods affected, we believe that new opportunities for propane sales arise as more geographically remote neighborhoods are developed.

 

Propane is generally less expensive to use than electricity for space heating, water heating and cooking and competes effectively with electricity in the parts of the country where propane is less expensive than electricity on an equivalent BTU basis. Although propane is similar to fuel oil in application, market demand and price, propane and fuel oil have generally developed their own distinct geographic markets. Because residential furnaces and appliances that burn propane will not operate on fuel oil, a conversion from one fuel to the other requires the installation of new equipment. Residential propane customers will have an incentive to switch to fuel oil only if fuel oil becomes significantly less expensive than propane. Conversely, we may be unable to expand our customer base in areas where fuel oil is widely used, particularly the northeast United States, unless propane becomes significantly less expensive than fuel oil. However, many industrial customers who use propane as a heating fuel have the capacity to switch to other fuels, such as fuel oil, on the basis of availability or minor variations in price.

 

Competition

 

In addition to competing with marketers of other fuels, we compete with other companies engaged in the propane distribution business. Competition within the propane distribution industry stems from two types of participants: the larger, multi-state marketers, including farmers’ cooperatives, and the smaller, local independent

marketers, including rural electric cooperatives. Based on our propane sales volumes in fiscal 2006, we believe that we are the second largest marketer of propane in the United States and the largest national provider of propane by portable tank exchange.

 

Most of our retail propane distribution locations compete with three or more marketers or distributors, primarily on the basis of reliability of service and responsiveness to customer needs, safety and price. Each retail distribution outlet operates in its own competitive environment because propane marketers typically reside in close proximity to their customers to lower the cost of providing service.

 

Other Activities

 

Our other activities primarily include the following:

 

 

These activities comprised less than 10% of our total revenues in our fiscal 2006.

 

Employees

 

We have no employees and are managed by our general partner pursuant to our partnership agreement. At August 31, 2006, our general partner had 3,669 full-time employees.

 

Our general partner employed its employees in the following areas:

 

 

Less than one percent of these employees are represented by an aggregate of five different local labor unions, which are all affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Our general partner has not experienced any significant work stoppages or other labor problems.

 

Governmental Regulation — Environmental and Safety Matters

 

Propane is not currently subject to any price or allocation regulation and has not been defined by any federal or state environment law as an environmentally hazardous substance.

 

In connection with all acquisitions of propane distribution businesses that involve the purchase of real property, we conduct a due diligence investigation to attempt to determine whether any substance other than propane has been sold from, stored on or otherwise come into contact with any such real property prior to its purchase. At a minimum, due diligence includes questioning the sellers, obtaining representations and warranties concerning the sellers’ compliance with environmental laws and visual inspections of the real property.

 

With respect to the transportation of propane by truck, we are subject to regulations promulgated under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Act. These regulations cover the transportation of flammable materials and are administered by the United States Department of Transportation. The National Fire Protection Association Pamphlet No. 58 establishes a national standard for the safe handling and storage of propane. Those rules and procedures have been adopted by us and serve as the industry standard by the states in which we operate.

 

We believe that we are in material compliance with all governmental regulations and industry standards applicable to environmental and safety matters.

Trademarks and Service Marks

 

We market our goods and services under various trademarks and tradenames, which we own or have a right to use. Those trademarks and tradenames include marks or pending marks before the United States Patent and Trademark Office such as Ferrellgas, Ferrell North America, Ferrellmeter and NRG Distributors. Our general partner has an option to purchase for a nominal value the tradenames “Ferrellgas” and “Ferrell North America” and the trademark “Ferrellmeter” that it contributed to us during 1994, if it is removed as our general partner other than “for cause.” If our general partner ceases to serve as our general partner for any reason other than “for cause,” it will have the option to purchase our other tradenames and trademarks from us for fair market value.

 

We believe that the Blue Rhino mark and Blue Rhino’s other trademarks, service marks and patents are an important part of our consistent domestic and international growth in both tank exchange and outdoor living product categories. Included in the registered and pending trademarks and service marks are the designations Blue Rhino^®, Blue Rhino & Design^®, Rhino Design^tm, Grill Gas & Design^®, A Better Way^tm, Spark Something Fun^®, America’s Choice for Grill Gas^®, RhinoTUFF^®, Tri-Safe^®, Drop, Swap and Go^tm, Rhino Power^tm, Uniflame^®, UniGrill^®, Patriot^®, Grill Aficionado^®, Skeetervac^®, Fine Tune^®, Vac & Tac^®, Wavedrawer^®, It’s Your Backyard. Enjoy It More With Skeetervac^®, Less Biting Insects. More Backyard Fun^®, DuraClay^®, Endless Summer^® and Endless Summer Comfort^®. In addition, we have patents issued for a Method for Reconditioning a Propane Gas Tank and an Overflow Protection Valve Assembly, which expire in 2017 and 2018, respectively, as well as various other patents and patent applications pending. The protection afforded by our patents furthers our ability to cost-effectively service our customers and to maintain our competitive advantages.

 

Businesses of Other Subsidiaries

 

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. is a Delaware corporation formed in 1996 and is our wholly-owned subsidiary. Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. has nominal assets and does not conduct any operations, but serves as a co-issuer and co-obligor for debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners. Institutional investors that might otherwise be limited in their ability to invest in debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners because it is a partnership are potentially able to invest in debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners because Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. acts as a co-issuer and co-obligor. Because of its structure and pursuant to the reduced disclosure format, a discussion of the results of operations, liquidity and capital resources of Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. is not presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Note B to Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp.’s financial statements for a discussion of the debt securities with respect to which Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. is serving as a co-issuer and co-obligor.

 

Ferrellgas Finance Corp. is a Delaware corporation formed in 2003 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership. Ferrellgas Finance Corp. has nominal assets and does not conduct any operations, but serves as a co-issuer and co-obligor for debt securities of the operating partnership. Institutional investors that might otherwise be limited in their ability to invest in debt securities of the operating partnership because it is a partnership are potentially able to invest in debt securities of the operating partnership because Ferrellgas Finance Corp. acts as a co-issuer and co-obligor. Because of its structure and pursuant to the reduced disclosure format, a discussion of the results of operations, liquidity and capital resources of Ferrellgas Finance Corp. is not presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Note B to Ferrellgas Finance Corp.’s financial statements for a discussion of the debt securities with respect to which Ferrellgas Finance Corp. is serving as a co-issuer and co-obligor.

 

Ferrellgas Receivables, LLC was organized in September 2000, and is a wholly-owned, unconsolidated qualifying special purpose entity and a subsidiary of the operating partnership. The operating partnership transfers interests in a pool of accounts receivable to Ferrellgas Receivables. Ferrellgas Receivables then sells the interests to commercial paper conduits of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Fifth Third Bank. Ferrellgas Receivables does not conduct any other activities. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” the transactions with Ferrellgas Receivables are accounted for in our consolidated financial statements as sales of accounts receivable with the retention of an interest in transferred accounts receivable. The accounts receivable securitization facility is more fully described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Operating Activities” and in Note H — Accounts receivable securitization — to our consolidated financial statements provided herein.

We also sell gas grills, patio heaters, fireplace and garden accessories, mosquito traps, and other outdoor products. These products are manufactured by independent third parties in Asia and are sold to mass market retailers in Asia or shipped to the United States, where they are sold under our various trade names. These products are sold through Blue Rhino Global Sourcing, LLC and Uni Asia, Ltd., each taxable corporations that are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the operating partnership.

 

Blue Rhino Canada, Inc. is a taxable Delaware corporation through which we conduct our portable tank exchange in Canada and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership.

 

Risks Inherent in the Distribution of Propane

 

Weather conditions may reduce the demand for propane; our financial condition is vulnerable to warm winters and poor weather in the grilling season.

 

Weather conditions have a significant impact on the demand for propane for both heating and agricultural purposes. Many of our customers rely heavily on propane as a heating fuel. Accordingly, our sales volumes of propane are highest during the five-month winter-heating season of November through March and are directly affected by the temperatures during these months. During fiscal 2006, approximately 57% of our propane sales volume was attributable to sales during the winter-heating season. Actual weather conditions can vary substantially from year to year, which may significantly affect our financial performance. Furthermore, variations in weather in one or more regions in which we operate can significantly affect our total propane sales volume and therefore our realized profits. A negative effect on our sales volume may in turn affect our results of operations. The agricultural demand for propane is also affected by weather, as dry or warm weather during the harvest season may reduce the demand for propane used in some crop drying applications.

 

Our portable tank exchange operations experience higher volumes in the spring and summer, which includes the majority of the grilling season. Sustained periods of poor weather, particularly in the grilling season, can negatively affect our portable tank exchange revenues. In addition, poor weather may reduce consumers’ propensity to purchase and use grills and other propane-fueled appliances thereby reducing demand for portable tank exchange as well as the demand for our outdoor products.

 

Hurricanes and other natural disasters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Hurricanes can potentially destroy thousands of business structures and homes and, if occurring in the Gulf Coast region of the United States, could disrupt the supply chain for oil and gas products. Disruptions in supply could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Damages and higher prices caused by hurricanes and other natural disasters could have an adverse effect on our financial condition due to the impact on the financial condition of our customers.

 

The propane distribution business is highly competitive, which may negatively affect our sales volumes and/or our results of operations.

 

Our profitability is affected by the competition for customers among all of the participants in the propane distribution business. We compete with a number of large national and regional firms and several thousand small independent firms. Because of the relatively low barriers to entry into the propane market, there is the potential for small independent propane distributors, as well as other companies not previously engaged in propane distribution, to compete with us. In recent years, some rural electric cooperatives and fuel oil distributors have expanded their businesses to include propane distribution. As a result, we are subject to the risk of additional competition in the future. Some of our competitors may have greater financial resources than we do. Should a competitor attempt to increase market share by reducing prices, our operating margins and customer base may be negatively impacted. Generally, warmer-than-normal weather and increasing fuel prices further intensifies competition. We believe that our ability to compete effectively depends on our service reliability, our responsiveness to customers, our ability to maintain competitive propane prices and control our operating expenses.

The propane distribution industry is a mature one, which may limit our growth.

 

The propane distribution industry is a mature one. We foresee only limited growth in total national demand for propane in the near future. Year-to-year industry volumes are primarily impacted by fluctuations in temperatures and economic conditions. Our ability to grow our sales volumes within the propane distribution industry is primarily dependent upon our ability to acquire other propane distributors, to integrate those acquisitions into our operations, and upon the success of our marketing efforts to acquire new customers. If we are unable to compete effectively in the propane distribution business, we may lose existing customers or fail to acquire new customers.

 

The propane distribution business faces competition from other energy sources, which may reduce the existing demand for our propane.

 

Propane competes with other sources of energy, some of which are less costly for equivalent energy value. We compete for customers against suppliers of electricity, natural gas and fuel oil. Electricity is a major competitor of propane, but propane generally enjoys a competitive price advantage over electricity. Except for some industrial and commercial applications, propane is generally not competitive with natural gas in areas where natural gas pipelines already exist because such pipelines generally make it possible for the delivered cost of natural gas to be less expensive than the bulk delivery of propane. The expansion of natural gas into traditional propane markets has historically been inhibited by the capital cost required to expand distribution and pipeline systems, however, the gradual expansion of the nation’s natural gas distribution systems has resulted in the availability of natural gas in areas that were previously dependent upon propane. Although propane is similar to fuel oil in some applications and market demand, propane and fuel oil compete to a lesser extent primarily because of the cost of converting from one to the other and due to the fact that both fuel oil and propane have generally developed their own distinct geographic markets. We cannot predict the effect that the development of alternative energy sources might have on our operations.

 

Energy efficiency and technology advances may affect demand for propane; increases in propane prices may cause our residential customers to increase their conservation efforts.

 

The national trend toward increased conservation and technological advances, including installation of improved insulation and the development of more efficient furnaces and other heating devices, has reduced the demand for propane in our industry. We cannot predict the materiality of the effect of future conservation measures or the effect that any technological advances in heating, conservation, energy generation or other devices might have on our operations. As the price of propane increases, some of our customers tend to increase their conservation efforts and thereby decrease their consumption of propane. We cannot predict the materiality of the effect of those decreases on our financial results.

 

Current economic and political conditions may harm the energy business disproportionately to other industries.

 

Deteriorating regional and global economic conditions and the effects of ongoing military actions may cause significant disruptions to commerce throughout the world. If those disruptions occur in areas of the world which are tied to the energy industry, such as the Middle East, it is most likely that our industry will be either affected first or affected to a greater extent than other industries. These conditions or disruptions may:

 

 

Fuel prices are at relatively high levels and rising fuel prices may adversely affect our profits.

 

Fuel is a significant operating expense for us in connection with the delivery of propane to our customers. Rising fuel prices have resulted in increased transportation costs to us. The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events we cannot control, such as geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production

patterns and weather concerns. As a result, current fuel prices, and any increases in these prices, may adversely affect our profitability and competitiveness.

 

The revenues received from our portable tank exchange are concentrated with a limited number of retailers under non-exclusive arrangements that may be terminated at will.

 

The propane gallons sales that we generate from our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange are concentrated with a limited number of retailers. If one or more of these retailers were to materially reduce or terminate its business with us, the results from our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange operations may suffer. For fiscal 2006, Wal*Mart, Lowe’s, and Home Depot represented approximately 37%, 16% and 12% of our portable tank exchange’s net revenues, respectively. None of our significant retail accounts associated with our portable tank exchange operations are contractually bound to offer portable tank exchange service or products. Therefore, retailers can discontinue our delivery of propane to them by portable tank exchange service, or sales of our propane related products, at any time and accept a competitor’s delivery of propane by portable tank exchange, or its related propane products or none at all. Continued relations with a retailer depend upon various factors, including price, customer service, consumer demand and competition. In addition, most of our significant retailers have multiple vendor policies and may seek to accept a competitor’s delivery of propane by portable tank exchange, or accept products competitive with our propane related products, at new or existing locations of these significant retailers. If any significant retailer materially reduces, terminates or requires price reductions or other adverse modifications in our selling terms, our results from our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange operations may suffer.

 

If the independently-owned distributors that some of our customers rely upon for the delivery of propane by portable tank exchange do not perform up to the expectations of such customers, if we encounter difficulties in managing the operations of these distributors or if we or these distributors are not able to manage growth effectively, our relationships with our customers may be adversely impacted and our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange may suffer.

 

We rely in part on independently-owned distributors to deliver our propane for a retailer’s portable tank exchange service. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to maintain and manage distributor relationships and operations and on the distributors’ ability to set up and adequately service accounts. We exercise only limited influence over the resources that the independently-owned distributors devote to the delivery of propane by portable tank exchange. National retailers impose demanding service requirements on us, and we could suffer a loss of consumer or retailer goodwill if our distributors do not adhere to our quality control and service guidelines or fail to ensure the timely delivery of an adequate supply of propane by portable tank exchange at retail locations. The poor performance of a single distributor to a national retailer could jeopardize our entire relationship with that retailer and cause our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange to that particular retailer to suffer. In addition, the number of retail locations accepting delivery of our propane by portable tank exchange and, subsequently, the retailer’s corresponding sales have historically grown significantly along with the creation of our distributor network. Accordingly, our distributors must be able to adequately service an increasing number of retail accounts. If we or our independent distributors fail to manage growth effectively, our financial results from our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange may suffer.

 

If we are unable to manage the impact of overfill prevention device valve guidelines, our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange may suffer.

 

Guidelines published by the National Fire Protection Association in the current form of Pamphlet 58 and adopted in many states require that all portable propane tanks refilled after April 1, 2002 must be fitted with an overfill prevention valve. If we or our distributors cannot satisfy the demand for compliant portable propane tanks such that our retailers maintain an adequate supply, our retailer relationships and our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange may suffer. In addition, for some of our customers, we have fixed in advance the price of propane per portable tank exchange unit charged to our retailers. When pricing, we make assumptions with regard to the number of portable tanks that will already have an overfill prevention valve when presented for exchange, on which our margins will be greater, and the number of tanks that will need an overfill prevention valve. If our actual experience

is inconsistent with our assumptions, our margins on sales to that retailer may be lower than expected, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations of our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange.

 

We depend on particular management information systems to effectively manage all aspects of our delivery of propane.

 

We depend on our management information systems to process orders, manage inventory and accounts receivable collections, maintain distributor and customer information, maintain cost-efficient operations and assist in delivering propane on a timely basis. In addition, our staff of management information systems professionals relies heavily on the support of several key personnel and vendors. Any disruption in the operation of those management information systems, loss of employees knowledgeable about such systems, termination of our relationship with one or more of these key vendors or failure to continue to modify such systems effectively as our business expands could negatively affect our business.

 

Potential retail partners may not be able to obtain necessary permits or may be substantially delayed in obtaining necessary permits, which may adversely impact our ability to increase our delivery of propane by portable tank exchange to new retail locations.

 

Local ordinances, which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, generally require retailers to obtain permits to store and sell propane tanks. These ordinances influence retailers’ acceptance of propane by portable tank exchange, distribution methods, propane tank packaging and storage. The ability and time required to obtain permits varies by jurisdiction. Delays in obtaining permits have from time to time significantly delayed the installation of new retail locations. Some jurisdictions have refused to issue the necessary permits, which has prevented some installations. Some jurisdictions may also impose additional restrictions on our ability to market and our distributors’ ability to transport propane tanks or otherwise maintain its portable tank exchange services.

 

Risks Inherent to Our Business

 

Our substantial debt and other financial obligations could impair our financial condition and our ability to fulfill our obligations.

 

We have substantial indebtedness and other financial obligations. As of August 31, 2006:

 

 

The operating partnership has issued notes with maturity dates ranging from fiscal 2008 to 2014, that bear interest at rates ranging from 6.75% to 8.87%. These notes do not contain any sinking fund provisions but do require annual aggregate principal payments, without premium, during the following fiscal years of approximately:

 

 

Amounts outstanding under the operating partnership’s unsecured bank credit facility will be due on April 22, 2010. All of the indebtedness and other obligations described above are obligations of the operating partnership

except for $268.0 million of senior debt due 2012 issued by Ferrellgas Partners and Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. This $268.0 million in principal amount of senior notes also contain no sinking fund provisions.

 

Subject to the restrictions governing the operating partnership’s indebtedness and other financial obligations and the indenture governing Ferrellgas Partners’ outstanding senior notes due 2012, we may incur significant additional indebtedness and other financial obligations, which may be secured and/or structurally senior to any debt securities we may issue.

 

Our substantial indebtedness and other financial obligations could have important consequences to our security holders. For example, it could:

 

 

Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may be unable to refinance their indebtedness or pay that indebtedness if it becomes due earlier than scheduled.

 

If Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership are unable to meet their debt service obligations or other financial obligations, they could be forced to:

 

 

They may then be unable to obtain such financing or capital or sell their assets on satisfactory terms, if at all. Their failure to make payments, whether after acceleration of the due date of that indebtedness or otherwise, or our failure to refinance the indebtedness would impair their operating capacity and cash flows.

 

Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness and other financial obligations may reduce our operating flexibility.

 

The indenture governing the outstanding notes of Ferrellgas Partners and the agreements governing the operating partnership’s indebtedness and other financial obligations contain, and any indenture that will govern debt securities issued by Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may contain, various covenants that limit our ability and the ability of specified subsidiaries of ours to, among other things:

 

 

 

These restrictions could limit the ability of Ferrellgas Partners, the operating partnership and our other subsidiaries:

 

 

Some of the agreements governing our indebtedness and other financial obligations also require the maintenance of specified financial ratios and the satisfaction of other financial conditions. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and conditions can be affected by unexpected downturns in business operations beyond our control, such as significantly warmer than normal weather, a volatile energy commodity cost environment or an economic downturn. Accordingly, we may be unable to meet these ratios and conditions. This failure could impair our operating capacity and cash flows and could restrict our ability to incur debt or to make cash distributions, even if sufficient funds were available.

 

Our breach of any of these covenants or the operating partnership’s failure to meet any of these ratios or conditions could result in a default under the terms of the relevant indebtedness, which could cause such indebtedness or other financial obligations, and by reason of cross-default provisions, any of Ferrellgas Partners’ or the operating partnership’s other outstanding notes or future debt securities, to become immediately due and payable. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could initiate a bankruptcy proceeding or liquidation proceeding or proceed against the collateral, if any. If the lenders of the operating partnership’s indebtedness or other financial obligations accelerate the repayment of borrowings or other amounts owed, we may not have sufficient assets to repay our indebtedness or other financial obligations, including our outstanding notes and any future debt securities.

 

Our results of operations and our ability to make distributions or pay interest or principal on debt securities could be negatively impacted by price and inventory risk and management of these risks.

 

The amount of gross profit we make depends significantly on the excess of the sales price over our costs to purchase and distribute propane. Consequently, our profitability is sensitive to changes in energy prices, in particular, changes in wholesale propane prices. Propane is a commodity whose market price can fluctuate significantly based on changes in supply, changes in other energy prices or other market conditions. We have no control over these market conditions. In general, product supply contracts permit suppliers to charge posted prices plus transportation costs at the time of delivery or the current prices established at major delivery points. Any increase in the price of product could reduce our gross profit because we may not be able to immediately pass rapid increases in such costs, or costs to distribute product, on to our customers.

 

While we generally attempt to minimize our inventory risk by purchasing product on a short-term basis, we may purchase and store propane or other natural gas liquids depending on inventory and price outlooks. We may

purchase large volumes of propane at the then current market price during periods of low demand and low prices, which generally occurs during the summer months. The market price for propane could fall below the price at which we made the purchases, which would adversely affect our profits or cause sales from that inventory to be unprofitable. A portion of our inventory is purchased under supply contracts that typically have a one-year term and at a price that fluctuates based on the prevailing market prices. Our contracts with our independent portable tank exchange distributors provide for a portion of our payment to the distributor to be based upon a price that fluctuates based on the prevailing propane market prices. To limit our overall price risk, we may purchase and store physical product and enter into fixed price over-the-counter energy commodity forward contracts, swaps and options that have terms of up to 24 months. This strategy may not be effective in limiting our price risk if, for example, weather conditions significantly reduce customer demand, or market or weather conditions prevent the delivery of physical product during periods of peak demand, resulting in excess physical product after the end of the winter heating season and the expiration of related forward or option contracts.

 

Some of our sales are pursuant to commitments at fixed prices. To manage these commitments, we may purchase and store physical product and/or enter into fixed price-over-the-counter energy commodity forward contracts, swaps and options. We may enter into these agreements at volume levels that we believe are necessary to mitigate the price risk related to our anticipated sales volumes under the commitments. If the price of propane declines and our customers purchase less propane than we have purchased from our suppliers, we could incur losses when we sell the excess volumes. If the price of propane increases and our customers purchase more propane than we have purchased from our suppliers, we could incur losses when we are required to purchase additional propane to fulfill our customers’ orders. The risk management of our inventory and contracts for the future purchase of product could impair our profitability if the price of product changes in ways we do not anticipate.

 

We may also purchase and sell derivatives to manage other risks associated with commodity prices. Our risk management trading activities could use various types of energy commodity forward contracts, options and swaps traded on the over-the-counter financial markets and futures and options traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange to manage and hedge our exposure to the volatility of floating commodity prices and to protect our inventory positions. These risk management trading activities would be based on our management’s estimates of future events and prices and would be intended to generate a profit which we would then apply to reduce our cost of product sold. However, if those estimates were incorrect or other market events outside of our control were to occur, such activities could generate a loss in future periods which would increase our cost of product sold and potentially impair our profitability.

 

The Board of Directors of our general partner has adopted a commodity risk management policy which places specified restrictions on all of our commodity risk management activities such as limits on the types of commodities, loss limits, time limits on contracts and limitations on our ability to enter into derivative contracts. The policy also requires the establishment of a risk management committee of senior executives. This committee is responsible for monitoring commodity risk management activities, establishing and maintaining timely reporting and establishing and monitoring specific limits on the various commodity risk management activities. These limits may be waived on a case-by-case basis by a majority vote of the risk management committee and/or Board of Directors, depending on the specific limit being waived. From time to time, for valid business reasons based on the facts and circumstances, authorization has been granted to allow specific commodity risk management positions to exceed established limits. If we sustain material losses from our risk management activities due to our failure to anticipate future events, a failure of the policy, incorrect waivers or otherwise, our ability to make distributions to our unitholders or pay interest or principal of any debt securities may be negatively impacted as a result of such loss.

 

We are dependent on our principal suppliers, which increases the risks from an interruption in supply and transportation.

 

Through our supply procurement activities, we purchased approximately 50% of our propane from seven suppliers during fiscal 2006. In addition, during extended periods of colder-than-normal weather, suppliers may temporarily run out of propane necessitating the transportation of propane by truck, rail car or other means from other areas. If supplies from these sources were interrupted or difficulties in alternative transportation were to arise, the cost of procuring replacement supplies and transporting those supplies from alternative locations might be materially higher and, at least on a short-term basis, our margins could be reduced.

The availability of cash from our credit facilities may be impacted by many factors beyond our control.

 

We typically borrow on the operating partnership’s bank credit facility or sell accounts receivable under its accounts receivable securitization facility to fund our working capital requirements. We may also borrow on the operating partnership’s bank credit facility to fund distributions to our unitholders. We purchase product from suppliers and make payments with terms that are typically within five to ten days of delivery. We believe that the availability of cash from the operating partnership’s bank credit facility and the accounts receivable securitization facility will be sufficient to meet our future working capital needs. However, if we were to experience an unexpected significant increase in working capital requirements or have insufficient funds to fund distributions, this need could exceed our immediately available resources. Events that could cause increases in working capital borrowings or letter of credit requirements may include:

 

 

As is typical in our industry, our retail customers generally do not pay upon receipt, but pay between 30 and 60 days after delivery. During the winter heating season, we experience significant increases in accounts receivable and inventory levels and thus a significant decline in working capital availability. Although we have the ability to fund working capital with borrowings from the operating partnership’s bank credit facility and sales of accounts receivable under its accounts receivable securitization facility, we cannot predict the effect that increases in propane prices and colder-than-normal winter weather may have on future working capital availability.

 

We may not be successful in making acquisitions and any acquisitions we make may not result in our anticipated results; in either case, this would potentially limit our growth, limit our ability to compete and impair our results of operations.

 

We have historically expanded our business through acquisitions. We regularly consider and evaluate opportunities to acquire local, regional and national propane distributors. We may choose to finance these acquisitions through internal cash flow, external borrowings or the issuance of additional common units or other securities. We have substantial competition for acquisitions of propane companies. Although we believe there are numerous potential large and small acquisition candidates in our industry, there can be no assurance that:

 

 

We are subject to operating and litigation risks, which may not be covered by insurance.

 

Our operations are subject to all operating hazards and risks normally incidental to the handling, storing and delivering of combustible liquids such as propane. As a result, we have been, and are likely to be, a defendant in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We will maintain insurance policies with insurers in such amounts and with such coverages and deductibles as we believe are reasonable and prudent. However, we cannot guarantee that such insurance will be adequate to protect us from all material expenses related

to potential future claims for personal injury and property damage or that such levels of insurance will be available in the future at economical prices.

 

Risks Inherent to an Investment in Our Debt Securities

 

Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership are required to distribute all of their available cash to their equity holders and Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership are not required to accumulate cash for the purpose of meeting their future obligations to holders of their debt securities, which may limit the cash available to service those debt securities.

 

Subject to the limitations on restricted payments contained in the indenture that governs Ferrellgas Partners’ outstanding notes, the instruments governing the outstanding indebtedness of the operating partnership and any applicable indenture that will govern any debt securities Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may issue, the partnership agreements of both Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership require us to distribute all of our available cash each fiscal quarter to our limited partners and our general partner and do not require us to accumulate cash for the purpose of meeting obligations to holders of any debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership. Available cash is generally all of our cash receipts, less cash disbursements and adjustments for net changes in reserves. As a result of these distribution requirements, we do not expect either Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership to accumulate significant amounts of cash. Depending on the timing and amount of our cash distributions and because we are not required to accumulate cash for the purpose of meeting obligations to holders of any debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership, such distributions could significantly reduce the cash available to us in subsequent periods to make payments on any debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership.

 

Debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners will be structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of the operating partnership and its subsidiaries.

 

Debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners will be effectively subordinated to all existing and future claims of creditors of the operating partnership and its subsidiaries, including:

 

 

This subordination is due to these creditors’ priority as to the assets of the operating partnership and its subsidiaries over Ferrellgas Partners’ claims as an equity holder in the operating partnership and, thereby, indirectly, the claims of holders of Ferrellgas Partners’ debt securities. As a result, upon any distribution to these creditors in a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization or similar proceeding relating to Ferrellgas Partners or its property, the operating partnership’s creditors will be entitled to be paid in full before any payment may be made with respect to Ferrellgas Partners’ debt securities. Thereafter, the holders of Ferrellgas Partners’ debt securities will participate with its trade creditors and all other holders of its indebtedness in the assets remaining, if any. In any of these cases, Ferrellgas Partners may have insufficient funds to pay all of its creditors, and holders of its debt securities may therefore receive less, ratably, than creditors of the operating partnership and its subsidiaries. As of August 31, 2006, the operating partnership had approximately $780.9 million of outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities to which any of the debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners will effectively rank junior.

 

All payments on any subordinated debt securities that we may issue will be subordinated to the payments of any amounts due on any senior indebtedness that we may have issued or incurred.

 

The right of the holders of subordinated debt securities to receive payment of any amounts due to them, whether interest, premium or principal, will be subordinated to the right of all of the holders of our senior

indebtedness, as such term will be defined in the applicable subordinated debt indenture, to receive payments of all amounts due to them. If an event of default on any of our senior indebtedness occurs, then until such event of default has been cured, we may be unable to make payments of any amounts due to the holders of our subordinated debt securities. Accordingly, in the event of insolvency, creditors who are holders of our senior indebtedness may recover more, ratably, than the holders of our subordinated debt securities.

 

Debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners are expected to be non-recourse to the operating partnership, which will limit remedies of the holders of Ferrellgas Partners’ debt securities.

 

Ferrellgas Partners’ obligations under any debt securities are expected to be non-recourse to the operating partnership. Therefore, if Ferrellgas Partners should fail to pay the interest or principal on the notes or breach any of its other obligations under its debt securities or any applicable indenture, holders of debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners will not be able to obtain any such payments or obtain any other remedy from the operating partnership or its subsidiaries. The operating partnership and its subsidiaries will not be liable for any of Ferrellgas Partners’ obligations under its debt securities or the applicable indenture.

 

Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may be unable to repurchase debt securities upon a change of control; it may be difficult to determine if a change of control has occurred.

 

Upon the occurrence of “change of control” events as may be described from time to time in our filings with the SEC and related to the issuance by Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership of debt securities, the applicable issuer or a third party may be required to make a change of control offer to repurchase those debt securities at a premium to their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The applicable issuer may not have the financial resources to purchase its debt securities in that circumstance, particularly if a change of control event triggers a similar repurchase requirement for, or results in the acceleration of, other indebtedness. The indenture governing Ferrellgas Partners’ outstanding notes contains such a repurchase requirement. Some of the agreements governing the operating partnership’s indebtedness currently provide that specified change of control events will result in the acceleration of the indebtedness under those agreements. Future debt agreements of Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may also contain similar provisions. The obligation to repay any accelerated indebtedness of the operating partnership will be structurally senior to Ferrellgas Partners’ obligations to repurchase its debt securities upon a change of control. In addition, future debt agreements of Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may contain other restrictions on the ability of Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership to repurchase its debt securities upon a change of control. These restrictions could prevent the applicable issuer from satisfying its obligations to purchase its debt securities unless it is able to refinance or obtain waivers under any indebtedness of Ferrellgas Partners or of the operating partnership containing these restrictions. The applicable issuer’s failure to make or consummate a change of control repurchase offer or pay the change of control purchase price when due may give the trustee and the holders of the debt securities particular rights as may be described from time to time in our filings with the SEC.

 

In addition, one of the events that may constitute a change of control is a sale of all or substantially all of the applicable issuer’s assets. The meaning of “substantially all” varies according to the facts and circumstances of the subject transaction and has no clearly established meaning under New York law, which is the law that will likely govern any indenture for the debt securities. This ambiguity as to when a sale of substantially all of the applicable issuer’s assets has occurred may make it difficult for holders of debt securities to determine whether the applicable issuer has properly identified, or failed to identify, a change of control.

 

There may be no active trading market for our debt securities, which may limit a holder’s ability to sell our debt securities.

 

We do not intend to list the debt securities we may issue from time to time on any securities exchange or to seek approval for quotations through any automated quotation system. An established market for the debt securities may not develop, or if one does develop, it may not be maintained. Although underwriters may advise us that they intend to make a market in the debt securities, they are not expected to be obligated to do so and may discontinue such

market making activity at any time without notice. In addition, market-making activity will be subject to the limits imposed by the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. For these reasons, we cannot assure a debt holder that:

 

 

If a public market for the debt securities did develop, the debt securities could trade at prices that may be higher or lower than their principal amount or purchase price, depending on many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the market for similar debt securities and our financial performance. Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt, such as our debt securities, has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial fluctuations in the prices of these securities.

 

Risks Inherent to an Investment in Ferrellgas Partners’ Equity

 

Ferrellgas Partners may sell additional limited partner interests, diluting existing interests of unitholders.

 

The partnership agreement of Ferrellgas Partners generally allows Ferrellgas Partners to issue additional limited partner interests and other equity securities. When Ferrellgas Partners issues additional equity securities, a unitholder’s proportionate partnership interest will decrease. Such an issuance could negatively affect the amount of cash distributed to unitholders and the market price of common units. The issuance of additional common units will also diminish the relative voting strength of the previously outstanding common units.

 

Cash distributions are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with our performance and other external factors.

 

Although we are required to distribute all of our “available cash,” we cannot guarantee the amounts of available cash that will be distributed to the holders of our equity securities. Available cash is generally all of our cash receipts, less cash disbursements and adjustments for net changes in reserves. The actual amounts of available cash will depend upon numerous factors, including:

 

 

Cash distributions are dependent primarily on cash flow, including from reserves and, subject to limitations, working capital borrowings. Cash distributions are not dependent on profitability, which is affected by non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions might be made during periods when we record losses and might not be made during periods when we record profits.

Our general partner has broad discretion to determine the amount of “available cash” for distribution to holders of our equity securities through the establishment and maintenance of cash reserves, thereby potentially lessening and limiting the amount of “available cash” eligible for distribution.

 

Our general partner determines the timing and amount of our distributions and has broad discretion in determining the amount of funds that will be recognized as “available cash.” Part of this discretion comes from the ability of our general partner to establish and make additions to our reserves. Decisions as to amounts to be placed in or released from reserves have a direct impact on the amount of available cash for distributions because increases and decreases in reserves are taken into account in computing available cash. Funds within or added to our reserves are not considered to be “available cash” and are therefore not required to be distributed. Each fiscal quarter, our general partner may, in its reasonable discretion, determine the amounts to be placed in or released from reserves, subject to restrictions on the purposes of the reserves. Reserves may be made, increased or decreased for any proper purpose, including, but not limited to, reserves:

 

 

The decision by our general partner to establish, increase or decrease our reserves may limit the amount of cash available for distribution to holders of our equity securities. Holders of our equity securities will not receive payments required by such securities unless we are able to first satisfy our own obligations and the establishment of any reserves. See the first risk factor under “— Risks Arising from Our Partnership Structure and Relationship with Our General Partner.”

 

The debt agreements of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership may limit their ability to make distributions to holders of their equity securities.

 

The debt agreements governing Ferrellgas Partners’ and the operating partnership’s outstanding indebtedness contain restrictive covenants that may limit or prohibit distributions to holders of their equity securities under various circumstances. Ferrellgas Partners’ existing indenture generally prohibits it from:

 

 

See the first risk factor under “— Risks Arising from Our Partnership Structure and Relationship with Our General Partner” for a description of the restrictions on the operating partnership’s ability to distribute cash to Ferrellgas Partners. Any indenture applicable to future issuances of debt securities by Ferrellgas Partners or the operating partnership may contain restrictions that are the same as or similar to those in their existing debt agreements.

 

The distribution priority to our common units owned by the public terminates no later than April 30, 2010.

 

Assuming that the restrictions under our debt agreements are met, our partnership agreements require us to distribute 100% of our available cash to our unitholders on a quarterly basis. Available cash is generally all of our cash receipts, less cash disbursements and adjustments for net changes in reserves. Currently, the common units

owned by the public have a right to receive distributions of available cash before any distributions of available cash are made on the common units owned by Ferrell Companies. We must pay a distribution on the publicly-held common units before we pay a distribution on the common units held by Ferrell Companies. If there exists an outstanding amount of deferred distributions on the common units held by Ferrell Companies of $36.0 million, the common units held by Ferrell Companies will be paid in the same manner as the publicly-held common units. While there are any deferred distributions outstanding on common units held by Ferrell Companies, we may not increase the distribution to our public common unitholders above the highest quarterly distribution paid on our common units for any of the immediately preceding four fiscal quarters. After payment of all required distributions, we will use remaining available cash to reduce any amount previously deferred on the common units held by Ferrell Companies.

 

This distribution priority right is scheduled to end April 30, 2010, or earlier if there is a change of control, we dissolve or Ferrell Companies sells all of our common units held by it. Whether an extension of the expiration of the distribution priority is likely or unlikely involves several factors that are not currently known and/or cannot be assessed until a time closer to the expiration date. The termination of this distribution priority may lower the market price for our common units.

 

Persons owning 20% or more of Ferrellgas Partners’ common units cannot vote. This limitation does not apply to common units owned by Ferrell Companies, our general partner and its affiliates.

 

All common units held by a person that owns 20% or more of Ferrellgas Partners’ common units cannot be voted. This provision may:

 

 

This limitation does not apply to our general partner and its affiliates. Ferrell Companies, the parent of our general partner, beneficially owns all of the outstanding capital stock of our general partner in addition to approximately 32% of our common units.

 

Risks Arising from Our Partnership Structure and Relationship with Our General Partner

 

Ferrellgas Partners is a holding entity and has no material operations or assets. Accordingly, Ferrellgas Partners is dependent on distributions from the operating partnership to service its obligations. These distributions are not guaranteed and may be restricted.

 

Ferrellgas Partners is a holding entity for our subsidiaries, including the operating partnership. Ferrellgas Partners has no material operations and only limited assets. Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. is Ferrellgas Partners’ wholly-owned finance subsidiary, serves as a co-obligor on any of its debt securities, conducts no business and has nominal assets. Accordingly, Ferrellgas Partners is dependent on cash distributions from the operating partnership and its subsidiaries to service obligations of Ferrellgas Partners. The operating partnership is required to distribute all of its available cash each fiscal quarter, less the amount of cash reserves that our general partner determines is necessary or appropriate in its reasonable discretion to provide for the proper conduct of our business, to provide funds for distributions over the next four fiscal quarters or to comply with applicable law or with any of our debt or other agreements. This discretion may limit the amount of available cash the operating partnership may distribute to Ferrellgas Partners each fiscal quarter. Holders of Ferrellgas Partners’ securities will not receive payments required by those securities unless the operating partnership is able to make distributions to Ferrellgas Partners after the operating partnership first satisfies its obligations under the terms of its own borrowing arrangements and reserves any necessary amounts to meet its own financial obligations.

 

In addition, the various agreements governing the operating partnership’s indebtedness and other financing transactions permit quarterly distributions only so long as each distribution does not exceed a specified amount, the operating partnership meets a specified financial ratio and no default exists or would result from such distribution. Those agreements include the indentures governing the operating partnership’s existing notes, a bank credit facility and an accounts receivable securitization facility. Each of these agreements contain various negative and affirmative

covenants applicable to the operating partnership and some of these agreements require the operating partnership to maintain specified financial ratios. If the operating partnership violates any of these covenants or requirements, a default may result and distributions would be limited. These covenants limit the operating partnership’s ability to, among other things:

 

 

The ownership of our general partner could change if Ferrell Companies defaults on its outstanding indebtedness.

 

Ferrell Companies owns all of the outstanding capital stock of our general partner in addition to beneficially owning approximately 32% of our outstanding common units. Ferrell Companies has pledged the majority of its beneficially owned common units against its variable interest debt, which totaled $92.0 million at August 29, 2006, with a scheduled maturity of December 2011. Ferrell Companies’ primary sources of income to pay its debt are dividends that it receives from our general partner and distributions received on the common units. For fiscal 2006, Ferrell Companies received approximately $40.1 million from these sources. If Ferrell Companies defaults on its debt, its lenders could acquire control of our general partner and the common units beneficially owned by it. In that case, the lenders could change management of our general partner and operate the general partner with different objectives than current management.

 

Unitholders have limits on their voting rights; our general partner manages and operates us, thereby generally precluding the participation of our unitholders in operational decisions.

 

Our general partner manages and operates us. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. Amendments to the agreement of limited partnership of Ferrellgas Partners may be proposed only by or with the consent of our general partner. Proposed amendments must generally be approved by holders of at least a majority of our outstanding common units.

 

Unitholders will have no right to elect our general partner on an annual or other continuing basis, and our general partner may not be removed except pursuant to:

 

 

Because Ferrell Companies is the parent of our general partner and beneficially owns approximately 32% of our outstanding common units and James E. Ferrell, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of our general partner, indirectly owns approximately 7% of our outstanding common units, amendments to the agreement of limited partnership of Ferrellgas Partners or the removal of our general partner may not be made if neither Ferrell Companies nor Mr. Ferrell consent to such action.

Our general partner has a limited call right with respect to the limited partner interests of Ferrellgas Partners.

 

If at any time less than 20% of the then-issued and outstanding limited partner interests of any class of Ferrellgas Partners are held by persons other than our general partner and its affiliates, our general partner has the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the remaining limited partner interests of such class held by such unaffiliated persons at a price generally equal to the then-current market price of limited partner interests of such class. As a consequence, a unitholder may be required to sell its common units at a time when the unitholder may not desire to sell them or at a price that is less than the price desired to be received upon such sale.

 

Unitholders may not have limited liability in specified circumstances and may be liable for the return of distributions.

 

The limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some states. If it were determined that we had been conducting business in any state without compliance with the applicable limited partnership statute, or that the right, or the exercise of the right by the limited partners as a group, to:

 

 

then the limited partners could be held liable in some circumstances for our obligations to the same extent as a general partner.

 

In addition, under some circumstances a unitholder may be liable to us for the amount of a distribution for a period of three years from the date of the distribution. Unitholders will not be liable for assessments in addition to their initial capital investment in our common units. Under Delaware General Corporate Law, we may not make a distribution to our unitholders if the distribution causes all our liabilities to exceed the fair value of our assets. Liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and liabilities for which recourse is limited to specific property are not counted for purposes of determining whether a distribution is permitted. Delaware law provides that a limited partner who receives such a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution violated the Delaware law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount for three years from the distribution date. Under Delaware law, an assignee that becomes a substituted limited partner of a limited partnership is liable for the obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the partnership. However, such an assignee is not obligated for liabilities unknown to that assignee at the time such assignee became a limited partner if the liabilities could not be determined from the partnership agreements.

 

Our general partner’s liability to us and our unitholders may be limited.

 

The partnership agreements of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership contain language limiting the liability of our general partner to us and to our unitholders. For example, those partnership agreements provide that:

 

 

The modifications of state law standards of fiduciary duty contained in our partnership agreements may significantly limit the ability of unitholders to successfully challenge the actions of our general partner as being a breach of what would otherwise have been a fiduciary duty. These standards include the highest duties of good faith, fairness and loyalty to the limited partners. Such a duty of loyalty would generally prohibit a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership from taking any action or engaging in any transaction for which it has a conflict of interest. Under our partnership agreements, our general partner may exercise its broad discretion and authority in our management and the conduct of our operations as long as our general partner’s actions are in our best interest.

 

Our general partner and its affiliates may have conflicts with us.

 

The directors and officers of our general partner and its affiliates have fiduciary duties to manage itself in a manner that is beneficial to its stockholder. At the same time, our general partner has fiduciary duties to manage us in a manner that is beneficial to us and our unitholders. Therefore, our general partner’s duties to us may conflict with the duties of its officers and directors to its stockholder.

 

Matters in which, and reasons that, such conflicts of interest may arise include:

 

 

 

See “— Conflicts of Interest” and “— Fiduciary Responsibilities” below.

 

Ferrell Companies may transfer the ownership of our general partner which could cause a change of our management and affect the decisions made by our general partner regarding resolutions of conflicts of interest.

 

Ferrell Companies, the owner of our general partner, may transfer the capital stock of our general partner without the consent of our unitholders. In such an instance, our general partner will remain bound by our partnership agreements. If, however, through share ownership or otherwise, persons not now affiliated with our general partner were to acquire its general partner interest in us or effective control of our general partner, our management and resolutions of conflicts of interest, such as those described above, could change substantially.

 

Our general partner may voluntarily withdraw or sell its general partner interest.

 

Our general partner may withdraw as the general partner of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership without the approval of our unitholders. Our general partner may also sell its general partner interest in Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership without the approval of our unitholders. Any such withdrawal or sale could have a material adverse effect on us and could substantially change the management and resolutions of conflicts of interest, as described above.

 

Our general partner can protect itself against dilution.

 

Whenever we issue equity securities to any person other than our general partner and its affiliates, our general partner has the right to purchase additional limited partner interests on the same terms. This allows our general partner to maintain its partnership interest in us. No other unitholder has a similar right. Therefore, only our general partner may protect itself against dilution caused by our issuance of additional equity securities.

 

Tax Risks

 

The IRS could treat us as a corporation for tax purposes, which would substantially reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders.

 

The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in us depends largely on our being treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. We believe that, under current law, we have been and will continue to be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. One of the requirements for such classification is that at least 90% of our gross income for each taxable year has been and will be “qualifying income” within the meaning of Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code. Whether we will continue to be classified as a partnership in part depends on our ability to meet this qualifying income test in the future.

 

If we were classified as a corporation for federal income tax purposes, we would pay tax on our income at corporate rates, currently 35% at the federal level, and we would probably pay additional state income taxes as well. In addition, distributions would generally be taxable to the recipient as corporate distributions and no income, gains, losses or deductions would flow through to our unitholders. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation, the cash available for distribution to our unitholders would be substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a corporation would result in a material reduction in the anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to our unitholders and thus would likely result in a substantial reduction in the value of our common units.

A change in current law or a change in our business could cause us to be treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject us to entity-level taxation. Our partnership agreements provide that if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects us to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income tax purposes, provisions of our partnership agreements will be subject to change. These changes would include a decrease in the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels to reflect the impact of such law on us.

 

A successful IRS contest of the federal income tax positions we take may reduce the market value of our common units and the costs of any contest will be borne by us and therefore indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner.

 

We have not requested any ruling from the IRS with respect to:

 

 

The IRS may adopt positions that differ from those expressed herein or from the positions we take. It may be necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings in an effort to sustain some or all of the positions we take, and some or all of these positions ultimately may not be sustained. Any contest with the IRS may materially reduce the market value of our common units and the prices at which our common units trade. In addition, our costs of any contest with the IRS will be borne by us and therefore indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner.

 

Unitholders may be required to pay taxes on income from us even if unitholders do not receive any cash distributions from us.

 

A unitholder will be required to pay federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on its share of our taxable income, even if it does not receive cash distributions from us. A unitholder may not receive cash distributions equal to its share of our taxable income or even the tax liability that results from that income. Further, a unitholder may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash it receives upon the sale of its units.

 

The ratio of taxable income to cash distributions could be higher or lower than our estimates, which could result in a material reduction of the market value of our common units.

 

We estimate that a person who acquires common units in the 2006 calendar year and owns those common units through the record dates for all cash distributions payable for all periods within the 2006 calendar year will be allocated, on a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable income that will be less than 10% of the cumulative cash distributed to such person for those periods. The taxable income allocable to a unitholder for subsequent periods may constitute an increasing percentage of distributable cash. These estimates are based on several assumptions and estimates that are subject to factors beyond our control. Accordingly, the actual percentage of distributions that will constitute taxable income could be higher or lower and any differences could result in a material reduction in the market value of our common units.

 

There are limits on the deductibility of losses

 

In the case of unitholders subject to the passive loss rules (generally, individuals, closely held corporations and regulated investment companies), any losses generated by us will only be available to offset our future income and cannot be used to offset income from other activities, including passive activities or investments. Unused losses may be deducted when the unitholder disposes of its entire investment in us in a fully taxable transaction with an unrelated party. A unitholder’s share of our net passive income may be offset by unused losses carried over from prior years, but not by losses from other passive activities, including losses from other publicly-traded partnerships.

 

Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could be different than expected.

 

If a unitholder sells its common units, the unitholder will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and its tax basis in those common units. Prior distributions in excess of the total net

taxable income the unitholder was allocated for a common unit, which decreased its tax basis in that common unit, will, in effect, become taxable income to the unitholder if the common unit is sold at a price greater than its tax basis in that common unit, even if the price received is less than its original cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or not representing a gain, will likely be ordinary income to that unitholder. Should the IRS successfully contest some positions we take, a selling unitholder could recognize more gain on the sale of units than would be the case under those positions, without the benefit of decreased income in prior years. In addition, if a unitholder sells its units, the unitholder may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash that unitholder receives from the sale.

 

Tax-exempt entities, regulated investment companies, and foreign persons face unique tax issues from owning common units that may result in additional tax liability or reporting requirements for them.

 

An investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as employee benefit plans, individual retirement accounts, regulated investment companies, generally known as mutual funds, and non-U.S. persons, raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our income allocated to organizations exempt from federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business taxable income and thus will be taxable to them. Net income from a “qualified publicly-traded partnership” is qualifying income for a regulated investment company, or mutual fund. However, no more than 25% of the value of a regulated investment company’s total assets may be invested in the securities of one or more qualified publicly-traded partnerships. We expect to be treated as a qualified publicly-traded partnership. Distributions to non-U.S. persons will be reduced by withholding taxes, at the highest effective tax rate applicable to individuals, and non-U.S. persons will be required to file federal income tax returns and generally pay tax on their share of our taxable income.

 

Certain information relating to a unitholder’s investment may be subject to special IRS reporting requirements.

 

Treasury regulations require taxpayers to report particular information on Form 8886 if they participate in a “reportable transaction.” Unitholders may be required to file this form with the IRS. A transaction may be a reportable transaction based upon any of several factors. The IRS may impose significant penalties on a unitholder for failure to comply with these disclosure requirements. Disclosure and information maintenance obligations are also imposed on “material advisors” that organize, manage or sell interests in reportable transactions, which may require us or our material advisors to maintain and disclose to the IRS certain information relating to unitholders.

 

An audit of us may result in an adjustment or an audit of a unitholder’s own tax return.

 

We may be audited by the IRS and tax adjustments could be made. The rights of a unitholder owning less than a 1% interest in us to participate in the income tax audit process are very limited. Further, any adjustments in our tax returns will lead to adjustments in the unitholders’ tax returns and may lead to audits of unitholders’ tax returns and adjustments of items unrelated to us. A unitholder will bear the cost of any expenses incurred in connection with an examination of its personal tax return.

 

Reporting of partnership tax information is complicated and subject to audits; we cannot guarantee conformity to IRS requirements.

 

We will furnish each unitholder with a Schedule K-1 that sets forth that unitholder’s allocable share of income, gains, losses and deductions. In preparing these schedules, we will use various accounting and reporting conventions and adopt various depreciation and amortization methods. We cannot guarantee that these schedules will yield a result that conforms to statutory or regulatory requirements or to administrative pronouncements of the IRS. If any of the information on these schedules is successfully challenged by the IRS, the character and amount of items of income, gain, loss or deduction previously reported by unitholders might change, and unitholders might be required to adjust their tax liability for prior years and incur interest and penalties with respect to those adjustments.

Unitholders may lose tax benefits as a result of nonconforming depreciation conventions.

 

Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common units, uniformity of the economic and tax characteristics of our common units to a purchaser of common units of the same class must be maintained. To maintain uniformity and for other reasons, we will take depreciation and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects of the Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those positions could reduce the amount of tax benefits available to our unitholders. A successful challenge could also affect the timing of these tax benefits or the amount of gain from the sale of common units and could have a negative impact on the value of our common units or result in audit adjustments to a unitholder’s tax returns.

 

As a result of investing in our common units, a unitholder will likely be subject to state and local taxes and return filing requirements in jurisdictions where it does not live.

 

In addition to federal income taxes, unitholders will likely be subject to other taxes, such as state and local taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions in which we do business or own property. A unitholder will likely be required to file state and local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in some or all of the various jurisdictions in which we do business or own property and may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with those requirements. We currently conduct business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. It is a unitholder’s responsibility to file all required United States federal, state and local tax returns.

 

States may subject partnerships to entity-level taxation in the future; thereby decreasing the amount of cash available to us for distributions and potentially causing a decrease in our distribution levels, including a decrease in the minimum quarterly distribution.

 

Several states are evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation through the imposition of state income, franchise or other forms of taxation. If additional states were to impose a tax upon us as an entity, the cash available for distribution to unitholders would be reduced. The partnership agreements of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership each provide that if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that subjects one or both partnerships to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects one or both partnerships to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income tax purposes, provisions of one or both partnership agreements will be subject to change. These changes would include a decrease in the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels to reflect the impact of those taxes.

 

Unitholders may have negative tax consequences if we default on our debt or sell assets.

 

If we default on any of our debt, the lenders will have the right to sue us for non-payment. That action could cause an investment loss and negative tax consequences for our unitholders through the realization of taxable income by unitholders without a corresponding cash distribution. Likewise, if we were to dispose of assets and realize a taxable gain while there is substantial debt outstanding and proceeds of the sale were applied to the debt, our unitholders could have increased taxable income without a corresponding cash distribution.

 

Conflicts of Interest

 

Conflicts of interest could arise as a result of the relationships between us, on the one hand, and our general partner and its affiliates, on the other. The directors and officers of our general partner have fiduciary duties to manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its stockholder. At the same time, our general partner has fiduciary duties to manage us in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders. The duties of our general partner to us and our unitholders, therefore, may conflict with the duties of the directors and officers of our general partner to its stockholder.

 

Matters in which, and reasons that, such conflicts of interest may arise include:

 

 

 

Fiduciary Responsibilities

 

Unless otherwise provided for in a partnership agreement, Delaware law generally requires a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership to adhere to fiduciary duty standards under which it owes its limited partners the highest duties of good faith, fairness and loyalty and which generally prohibit the general partner from taking any action or engaging in any transaction as to which it has a conflict of interest. Our partnership agreements expressly permit our general partner to resolve conflicts of interest between itself or its affiliates, on the one hand, and us or our unitholders, on the other, and to consider, in resolving such conflicts of interest, the interests of other parties in addition to the interests of our unitholders. In addition, the partnership agreement of Ferrellgas Partners provides that a purchaser of common units is deemed to have consented to specified conflicts of interest and actions of our general partner and its affiliates that might otherwise be prohibited, including those described above, and to have agreed that such conflicts of

interest and actions do not constitute a breach by our general partner of any duty stated or implied by law or equity. Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under our partnership agreements or its duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of such conflict is fair and reasonable to us. Any resolution of a conflict approved by the audit committee of our general partner is conclusively deemed fair and reasonable to us. The latitude given in our partnership agreements to our general partner in resolving conflicts of interest may significantly limit the ability of a unitholder to challenge what might otherwise be a breach of fiduciary duty.

 

The partnership agreements of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership expressly limit the liability of our general partner by providing that our general partner, its affiliates and their respective officers and directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our unitholders or assignees thereof for errors of judgment or for any acts or omissions if our general partner and such other persons acted in good faith. In addition, we are required to indemnify our general partner, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees, agents and trustees to the fullest extent permitted by law against liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by our general partner or such other persons if our general partner or such persons acted in good faith and in a manner it or they reasonably believed to be in, or (in the case of a person other than our general partner) not opposed to, the best interests of us and, with respect to any criminal proceedings, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful.

 

None.

 

We own or lease the following transportation equipment that is utilized primarily in the propane distribution operations.

 

 

The propane transport trailers have an average capacity of approximately 10,000 gallons. The bulk propane delivery trucks are generally fitted with 3,000 gallon tanks. Each railroad tank car has a capacity of approximately 30,000 gallons.

 

We typically manage our retail propane distribution locations using a structure where one location, referred to as a service center, is staffed to provide oversight and management to approximately five to six propane distribution locations, referred to as service units. Our retail propane distribution locations are comprised of 154 service centers and 673 service units. The service unit locations utilize hand-held computers and satellite technology to communicate with management typically located in the associated service center. We believe this structure together with our new technology platform allows us to more efficiently route and schedule customer deliveries and has significantly reduced the need for daily on-site management required by our previous operating platform.

 

In addition to our retail propane distribution locations, we also distribute propane for our portable tank exchange operations from 19 partnership-owned propane distribution locations and 31 independently-owned distributors.

 

We own approximately 49.5 million gallons of propane storage capacity at our propane distribution locations. We own our land and buildings in the local markets of approximately half of our operating locations and lease the remaining facilities on terms customary in the industry.

 

We own approximately 1.0 million propane tanks, most of which are located on customer property and rented to those customers. We also own approximately 3.5 million portable propane tanks, most of which are used by us to deliver propane to our portable tank exchange customers and to deliver propane to our industrial and commercial customers.

We lease approximately 72.1 million gallons of propane storage capacity located at underground storage facilities and pipelines at various locations around the United States.

 

We lease 109,312 square feet of office space at separate locations that comprise our corporate headquarters in the Kansas City metropolitan area. We also lease 63,014 square feet of office and warehouse space in Winston-Salem, North Carolina in connection with our portable tank exchange operations.

 

We believe that we have satisfactory title to or valid rights to use all of our material properties. Although some of those properties may be subject to liabilities and leases, liens for taxes not yet currently due and payable and immaterial encumbrances, easements and restrictions, we do not believe that any such burdens will materially interfere with the continued use of such properties in our business. We believe that we have obtained, or are in the process of obtaining, all required material approvals. These approvals include authorizations, orders, licenses, permits, franchises, consents of, registrations, qualifications and filings with, the various state and local governmental and regulatory authorities which relate to our ownership of properties or to our operations.

 

Our operations are subject to all operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing, transporting and otherwise providing for use by consumers of combustible liquids such as propane. As a result, at any given time, we are threatened with or named as a defendant in various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Currently, we are not a party to any legal proceedings other than various claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. It is not possible to determine the ultimate disposition of these matters; however, management is of the opinion that there are no known claims or contingent claims that are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

None.

 

Common Units of Ferrellgas Partners

 

Our common units represent limited partner interests in Ferrellgas Partners and are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “FGP.” As of August 31, 2006, we had 879 common unitholders of record. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common units on the New York Stock Exchange and the cash distributions declared per common unit for the periods indicated.

 

 

We make quarterly cash distributions of our available cash. Available cash is defined in our partnership agreement as, generally, the sum of our consolidated cash receipts less consolidated cash disbursements and changes in cash reserves established by our general partner for future requirements. To the extent necessary and due to the seasonal nature of our operations, we will generally reserve cash inflows from our second and third fiscal quarters for distributions during our first and fourth fiscal quarters. Based upon our current financial condition and results of operations, our general partner currently believes that during fiscal 2007 and 2008 we will be able to make quarterly cash distributions per common unit comparable to those quarterly distributions made during our last two fiscal years; however, no assurances can be given that such distributions will be made or the amount of such distributions. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of the financial tests and covenants which place limits on the amount of cash that we can use to pay distributions.

 

In March 2006, the following registration statements were effective upon filing or declared effective by the SEC:

 

 

In June 2006, we filed a registration statement with the SEC to register 968,959 common units previously issued pursuant to private placements effected between November 1994 and December 2005.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

All issuances of unregistered securities during fiscal 2006 were previously reported in a Quarterly Report or Current Report.

 

Ferrellgas Partners Tax Matters

 

Ferrellgas Partners is a master limited partnership and thus not subject to federal income taxes. Instead, our common unitholders are required to report for income tax purposes their allocable share of our income, gains, losses, deductions and credits, regardless of whether we make distributions to our common unitholders. Accordingly, each common unitholder should consult its own tax advisor in analyzing the federal, state, and local tax consequences applicable to its ownership or disposition of our common units. Ferrellgas Partners reports its tax information on a calendar year basis, while financial reporting is based on a fiscal year ending July 31.

 

Common Equity of Other Registrants

 

There is no established public trading market for the common equity of the operating partnership, Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. or Ferrellgas Finance Corp. All of the common equity of the operating partnership and Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. is held by Ferrellgas Partners and all of the common equity of Ferrellgas Finance Corp. is held by the operating partnership. There are no equity securities of the operating partnership, Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. or Ferrellgas Finance Corp. authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plan. During fiscal 2006, there were no issuances of securities of the operating partnership, Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. or Ferrellgas Finance Corp.

 

Neither Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. nor Ferrellgas Finance Corp. has declared or paid any cash dividends on its common equity during fiscal 2005 or 2006. The operating partnership distributes cash declared on its common equity four times per fiscal year. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing Activities — Distributions paid by the operating

partnership” for a discussion of its distributions during fiscal 2006. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of the financial tests and covenants which place limits on the amount of cash that the operating partnership can use to pay distributions.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

See “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Unitholder Matters — Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”

 

The following tables present selected consolidated historical financial data for Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership.

 

 

 

Our capital expenditures fall generally into five categories:

 

 

The sale of our non-strategic storage assets and the use of proceeds from that sale to retire long-term debt resulted in a significant decrease in our total assets and long-term debt as of July 31, 2005 as compared to July 31, 2004. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Overview.”

 

The Blue Rhino contribution resulted in a significant increase in our total assets, long-term debt and partners’ capital as of July 31, 2004 as compared to July 31, 2003. See Item 7. “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Results of Operations — Overview.”

The tank lease buyout contributed to an increase in our interest expense and a comparable decrease in equipment lease expense in fiscal 2003. This transaction also contributed to a significant increase in total assets and long-term debt as of July 31, 2003 as compared to July 31, 2002.

 

Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations relates to Ferrellgas Partners L.P. and the operating partnership.

 

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. and Ferrellgas Finance Corp. have nominal assets, do not conduct any operations and have no employees. Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. serves as co-obligor for debt securities of Ferrellgas Partners and Ferrellgas Finance Corp. serves as co-obligor for debt securities of the operating partnership. Accordingly, and due to the reduced disclosure format, a discussion of the results of operations, liquidity and capital resources of Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. and Ferrellgas Finance Corp. are not presented in this section.

 

The following is a discussion of our historical financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and accompanying Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The discussions set forth in the “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections generally refer to Ferrellgas Partners and its consolidated subsidiaries. However, in these discussions there exists two material differences between Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership. Those material differences are:

 

 

Overview

 

We are a leading distributor of propane and related equipment and supplies to customers primarily in the United States. We believe that we are the second largest retail marketer of propane in the United States including the largest national provider of propane by portable tank exchange as measured by our propane sales volumes in fiscal 2006. We serve more than one million residential, industrial/commercial, propane tank exchange, agricultural and other customers in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. Our operations primarily include the distribution and sale of propane and related equipment and supplies with concentrations in the Midwest, Southeast, Southwest and Northwest regions of the country.

 

Weather conditions have a significant impact on demand for propane for heating purposes. Accordingly, the volume of propane sold for this purpose is directly affected by the severity of the winter weather in the regions we serve and can vary substantially from year to year. In any given region, sustained warmer-than-normal temperatures will tend to result in reduced propane use, while sustained colder-than-normal temperatures will tend to result in greater use. We use information on temperatures to understand how our results of operations are affected by temperatures that are warmer or colder than normal. We use the definition of “normal” temperatures based on information published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”). Based on this information we calculate a ratio of actual heating degree days to normal heating degree days. Heating degree days are a general indicator of weather impacting propane usage.

 

The market for propane is seasonal because of increased demand during the winter months primarily for heating in residential and commercial buildings. Consequently, sales and operating profits are concentrated in our second and third fiscal quarters, which are during the winter heating season of November through March. However, the propane by portable tank exchanges sales volume provides us increased operating profits during our first and

fourth fiscal quarters due to its counter-seasonal business activities. It also provides us the ability to better utilize our seasonal resources at the retail distribution locations. Other factors affecting our results of operations include competitive conditions, energy commodity prices, demand for propane, timing of acquisitions and general economic conditions in the United States.

 

Our gross profit from the distribution of propane is primarily based on margins; that is, the cents-per-gallon difference between our costs to purchase and distribute propane and the sales prices we charge our customers. Our residential customers and portable tank exchange customers typically provide us a greater cents per gallon margin than our industrial/commercial, agricultural and other customers. The wholesale propane price per gallon is subject to various market conditions and may fluctuate based on changes in demand, supply and other energy commodity prices, primarily crude oil and natural gas as propane prices tend to correlate with the fluctuations of these underlying commodities. The wholesale price per gallon of propane has been at historically high levels during the past few fiscal years. We employ risk management activities that attempt to mitigate risks related to the purchasing and transporting of propane.

 

We continue to pursue the following business strategies:

 

 

We have developed and deployed new technology to improve our routing and scheduling of customer deliveries, customer administration and operational workflow. Approximately one-third of the deployment of this technology was completed by the end of fiscal 2004 with the remainder completed in fiscal 2005 and the first month of fiscal 2006. We now operate virtually all of our retail propane distribution outlets on this new technology platform.

 

Net earnings in fiscal 2006 was $25.0 million compared to net earnings in fiscal 2005 of $88.8 million. The decrease in net earnings of $63.8 million was primarily due to the following:

 

 

On July 29, 2005, we sold certain non-strategic storage and terminal assets located in Arizona, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina and Utah. We consider the sale of these assets to be discontinued operations. The proceeds from this sale were used to retire a portion of our long-term debt including accrued interest and a portion of our borrowings outstanding on our bank credit facility.

 

On June 30, 2005, we converted all of the senior units, including accrued and unpaid distributions, to common units.

 

On March 7, 2005, we extended our public common unit distribution priority to April 30, 2010.

 

During fiscal 2005, we raised approximately $144.0 million in equity through common unit offerings. The proceeds from these offerings were used to reduce borrowings outstanding under our bank credit facility and to fund acquisitions.

On April 20, 2004, an affiliate of our general partner acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Blue Rhino Corporation in an all cash merger, after which it converted Blue Rhino Corporation into a limited liability company, Blue Rhino LLC. On April 21, 2004, this affiliate contributed Blue Rhino LLC to our operating partnership, through a series of transactions. Blue Rhino LLC was thereafter merged with and into our operating partnership. The results of operations of the contributed Blue Rhino operations for fiscal 2006 and 2005 and for the period from April 21, 2004 through July 31, 2004 are included in our statement of earnings for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Forward-looking statements

 

Statements included in this report include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “forecast,” “strategy,” “position,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or comparable terminology. These statements often discuss plans, strategies, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future and are based upon the beliefs and assumptions of our management and on the information currently available to them. In particular, statements, express or implied, concerning future operating results or our ability to generate sales, income or cash flow are forward-looking statements.

 

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will affect our future results are beyond our ability to control or predict.

 

Some of our forward-looking statements include the following:

 

 

When considering any forward-looking statement, you should also keep in mind the risk factors in “Business — Risk Factors.” Any of these risks could impair our business, financial condition or results of operation. Any such impairment may affect our ability to make distributions to our unitholders or pay interest on the principal of any of our debt securities. In addition, the trading price, if any, of our securities could decline as a result of any such impairment.

 

Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or risk factors after the date of this annual report.

 

In addition, the classification of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership as partnerships for federal income tax purposes means that we do not generally pay federal income taxes. We do, however, pay taxes on the income of our subsidiaries that are corporations. We rely on a legal opinion from our counsel, and not a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, as to our proper classification for federal income tax purposes. See the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Tax Risks — The IRS could treat us as a corporation for tax purposes, which would substantially reduce the cash available for distribution to our unitholders.”

Results of Operations

 

Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2006 vs. July 31, 2005

 

 

Propane sales volumes during fiscal 2006 decreased 88.7 million gallons compared to the prior year period primarily due to customer conservation caused by higher commodity prices and warmer than normal temperatures, partially offset by gallons acquired through acquisitions completed during fiscal 2006 and 2005 and continued tank exchange gallon growth. Heating degree days, as reported by NOAA, were 11% warmer than normal during fiscal 2006 compared to being 6% warmer than normal during fiscal 2005.

 

Propane and other gas liquids sales and the related cost of product sold increased due to the effect of a significant increase in the wholesale cost of propane during fiscal 2006 as compared to the prior year period. The wholesale market price per gallon at one of the major supply points, Mt. Belvieu, Texas, averaged $1.03 per gallon during fiscal 2006, compared to an average of $0.82 per gallon in the prior year period. Other major supply points in the United States have also experienced significant increases.

 

Propane and other gas liquids sales increased $105.6 million compared to the prior year period. Approximately $227.8 million of this increase was primarily due to the effect of the significant increase in the wholesale cost per gallon of propane on our sales price per gallon, as discussed above, and, to a lesser extent, continued tank exchange gallon growth. This increase was partially offset by the impact from decreased propane sales volumes and warmer than normal weather, as discussed above.

 

Gross profit from propane and other gas liquids increased $48.4 million compared to the prior year period. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to higher average propane margins per gallon provided by enhanced controls over pricing attributable to our new technology platform completed during the first month of fiscal 2006, the continued growth in tank exchange volumes and acquisitions completed during fiscal 2006 and 2005. This increase in gross profit was partially offset by the impact from decreased propane sales volumes, as discussed above. Also contributing to the increased gross profit was the prior year period’s $9.7 million negative contribution to gross profit during fiscal 2005 related to risk management trading activities that was not repeated during fiscal 2006.

 

Operating income increased $35.4 million compared to the prior year period primarily due to the previously mentioned increase in gross profit, which was partially offset by an $8.7 million increase in operating expense and a $5.3 million increase in general and administrative expense. Operating expense increased due to variable expenses primarily related to the continued growth of tank exchange gallons, increased fuel costs, performance — based compensation, acquisitions completed during fiscal 2006 and 2005 and costs associated with internal growth. The increase in operating expense was partially offset by personnel savings related to the deployment of our new technology platform discussed above. General and administrative expense increased primarily due to a non-cash compensation expense related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 132(R)”) and performance-based compensation expense.

 

Interest expense decreased $7.3 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the retirement of a portion of our fixed rate senior notes during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

Interest expense of the operating partnership

 

Interest expense decreased $6.9 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the retirement of a portion of our fixed rate senior notes during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

 

Forward looking statements.  

 

We expect increases in fiscal 2007 for revenue — propane and other gas liquids sales, cost of product sold — propane and other gas liquids sales, gross profit, operating income and earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations as compared to fiscal 2006 due to:

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2005 vs. July 31, 2004

 

 

Propane sales volumes during fiscal 2005 increased 23.9 million gallons compared to the prior year period. The increase in propane sales volumes was primarily due to the contribution from the Blue Rhino transaction, completed in the second half of fiscal 2004, in addition to the acquisition of seven retail propane companies during fiscal 2005. The Blue Rhino contribution and the retail acquisitions accounted for approximately 62.0 million gallons of this increase. The increase was partially offset by decreased propane sales volumes due to customer conservation caused by higher commodity prices, and to a lesser extent, warmer than normal temperatures. Heating degree days, as reported by NOAA, were 6% warmer than normal during fiscal 2005 compared to being 5% warmer than normal during fiscal 2004.

 

The average sales price per gallon increased due to the effect of a significant increase in the wholesale cost of propane during fiscal 2005 as compared to the prior year period. The wholesale market price at one of the major supply points, Mt. Belvieu, Texas, averaged $0.82 per gallon during fiscal 2005, compared to an average of $0.63 per gallon in the prior year period. Other major supply points in the United States have also experienced significant increases.

 

Propane and other gas liquids sales increased $381.8 million compared to the prior year period. Approximately $223.5 million of this increase was caused by the significant increase in the wholesale cost per gallon of propane, as discussed above, and the fact that these increased costs were passed on to our customers during the year in the form of a higher retail price per gallon. In addition, approximately $181.8 million of the increased propane and other gas liquids sales increase was due to the contribution from the Blue Rhino transaction and the retail propane acquisitions completed during 2004 and 2005, as discussed above. These increases were partially offset by the impact on sales from the previously mentioned customer conservation and warmer temperatures.

 

Gross profit from propane and other gas liquids increased $60.1 million compared to the prior year period. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to an $80.7 million increase from the contribution of the Blue Rhino transaction and the retail propane acquisitions completed during fiscal 2004 and 2005, as discussed above. This increase in gross profit was partially offset by an $11.4 million lower contribution from risk management trading activities and by decreases resulting from the previously mentioned customer conservation and warmer

temperatures. See additional discussion regarding risk management trading activities in “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

 

Operating income decreased $17.6 million compared to the prior year period primarily due to an increase in operating expense of $42.9 million, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $26.9 million, and an increase in general and administrative expense of $7.8 million primarily due to the impact from the Blue Rhino contribution completed in the second half of fiscal 2004. This increase in expense was partially offset by the previously mentioned increase in gross profit.

 

Interest expense increased $17.1 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the issuance of $250.0 million 6.75% notes in April 2004, the proceeds from which were used to partially fund the Blue Rhino contribution.

 

Interest expense of the operating partnership

 

Interest expense increased $13.2 million compared to the prior year primarily due to the issuance of $250.0 million 6.75% notes in April 2004, the proceeds from which were used to partially fund the Blue Rhino contribution.

 

Discontinued operations

 

On July 29, 2005, we announced the closing of the sale of certain non-strategic storage and terminal assets located in Arizona, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina and Utah receiving approximately $144.0 million in cash. We recorded a gain of $97.0 million on the sale. We consider the sale of these assets to be discontinued operations and have reported results of operations from these assets as discontinued operations for all periods presented on the consolidated statements of earnings. See Note E — Discontinued operations — to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion about the sale of these assets. Operating results of discontinued operations are as follows:

 

 

Unit and stock-based compensation

 

On August 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes Accounting Principles Board No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the cost from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. It also establishes fair value as the measurement method in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. We adopted this standard using the modified prospective application method which resulted in a non-cash compensation charge of

$0.5 million and $1.4 million to operating expense and general and administrative expense, respectively, for fiscal 2006. See Note C — Unit and stock-based compensation — to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion about the related unit and stock-option plans and the implementation of this standard.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our cash requirements include working capital requirements, debt service payments, the minimum quarterly common unit distribution, and payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions. The minimum quarterly distribution of $0.50 was paid on September 14, 2006 to all common units that were outstanding on September 7, 2006, and represents the forty-eighth consecutive minimum quarterly distribution paid to our common unitholders dating back to October 1994. Our working capital requirements are subject to, among other things, the price of propane, delays in the collection of receivables, volatility in energy commodity prices, liquidity imposed by insurance providers, downgrades in our credit ratings, decreased trade credit, significant acquisitions, the weather and other changes in the demand for propane. Relatively colder weather and higher propane prices during the winter heating season are factors that could significantly increase our working capital requirements.

 

Our ability to satisfy our obligations is dependent upon future performance, which will be subject to prevailing economic, financial, business and weather conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Due to the seasonality of the retail propane distribution business, a significant portion of our cash flow from operations is generated during the winter heating season that occurs during our second and third fiscal quarters. Our net cash provided by operating activities primarily reflect earnings from our business activities adjusted for depreciation and amortization and changes in our working capital accounts. Historically, we generate significantly lower net cash from operating activities in our first and fourth fiscal quarters as compared to the second and third fiscal quarters because fixed costs generally exceed gross profit during the non-peak heating season. Subject to meeting the financial tests discussed below, our general partner believes that the operating partnership will have sufficient funds available to meet its obligations, and to distribute to Ferrellgas Partners sufficient funds to permit Ferrellgas Partners to meet its obligations for fiscal 2007 and 2008. In addition, our general partner believes that the operating partnership will have sufficient funds available to distribute to Ferrellgas Partners sufficient cash to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on all of its common units for fiscal 2007 and 2008.

 

Our bank credit facility, public debt, private debt and accounts receivable securitization facility contain several financial tests and covenants restricting our ability to pay distributions, incur debt and engage in certain other business transactions. In general, these tests are based on our debt-to-cash flow and cash-flow-to interest expense ratios. Our general partner currently believes that the most restrictive of these tests are debt incurrence limitations under the terms of our bank credit and accounts receivable securitization facilities and limitations on the payment of distributions within our 83/4% senior notes due 2012. The bank credit and accounts receivable securitization facilities generally limit the operating partnership’s ability to incur debt if it exceeds prescribed ratios of either debt to cash flow or cash flow to interest expense. Our 83/4% senior notes restrict payments if a minimum ratio of cash flow to interest expense is not met, assuming certain exceptions to this ratio limit have previously been exhausted. This restriction places limitations on our ability to make restricted payments such as the payment of cash distributions to unitholders. The cash flow used to determine these financial tests generally is based upon our most recent cash flow performance giving pro forma effect for acquisitions and divestitures made during the test period. Our bank credit facility, public debt, private debt and accounts receivable securitization facility do not contain early repayment provisions related to a potential decline in our credit rating.

 

As of July 31, 2006, we met all the required quarterly financial tests and covenants. Based upon current estimates of our future cash flow, our general partner believes that we will be able to continue to meet all of the required quarterly financial tests and covenants for fiscal 2007 and 2008. However, we may not meet the applicable financial tests in future quarters if we were to experience:

 

 

This failure could have a materially adverse effect on our operating capacity and cash flows and could restrict our ability to incur debt or to make cash distributions to our unitholders, even if sufficient funds were available. Depending on the circumstances, we may consider alternatives to permit the incurrence of debt or the continued payment of the quarterly cash distribution to our unitholders. No assurances can be given, however, that such alternatives can or will be implemented with respect to any given quarter.

 

We expect our future capital expenditures and working capital needs to be provided by a combination of cash generated from future operations, existing cash balances, the bank credit facility or the accounts receivable securitization facility. See additional information about the accounts receivable securitization facility in “Operating Activities — Accounts receivable securitization.” In order to reduce existing indebtedness, fund future acquisitions and expansive capital projects, we may obtain funds from our facilities, we may issue additional debt to the extent permitted under existing financing arrangements or we may issue additional equity securities, including, among others, common units.

 

In March, 2006, the following registration statements were effective upon filing or declared effective by the SEC:

 

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $93.0 million for fiscal 2006, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $93.9 million for the prior year period. This slight decrease in cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to a decrease in cash inflows from the utilization of our accounts receivable securitization facility, which is nearly offset by the improved results of operations as discussed above. We used $52.4 million in working capital during fiscal 2006 compared to $53.3 million during fiscal 2005. Our working capital requirements for inventory purchases increased $54.9 million during fiscal 2006. This increase was offset primarily due to the timing of accounts receivable collections and accounts payable disbursements.

 

Accounts receivable securitization

 

Cash flows from our accounts receivable securitization facility decreased $40.3 million primarily because more of our working capital needs were funded by improved results from operations. We received net funding of $4.0 million from this facility during fiscal 2006, compared to net funding of $44.3 million in the prior year period.

 

Our strategy for obtaining liquidity at the lowest cost of capital is to initially utilize the accounts receivable securitization facility before borrowings under the operating partnership’s bank credit facility. See additional discussion about the operating partnership’s bank credit facility in “Financing Activities — Bank credit facility.” Our utilization of the accounts receivable securitization facility is limited by the amount of accounts receivable that we are permitted to transfer according to the facility agreement. This arrangement allows us to sell between $85.0 million and $160.0 million of accounts receivable, depending upon the timing of the year and available undivided interests in our accounts receivable from certain customers. We renewed this facility effective June 6, 2006, for a 364-day commitment with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A and Fifth Third Bank. We generally increase our use of the accounts receivable securitization facility during the winter heating season when our working capital needs and our accounts receivable balances increase significantly. At July 31, 2006, we had funding outstanding of $70.0 million with the ability to transfer, at our option, an additional $12.5 million of our trade accounts receivable to the accounts receivable securitization facility. The facility provides us with the ability to transfer increased

amounts of accounts receivable during the winter heating season. As our trade accounts receivable increase during the winter heating season, the accounts receivable securitization facility permits us to transfer additional trade accounts receivable to the facility, thereby providing additional cash for working capital needs. This transaction is reflected in our consolidated financial statements as a sale of accounts receivable and a retained interest in transferred accounts receivable.

 

The operating partnership

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $116.8 million for fiscal 2006, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $117.8 million for the prior year period. This slight decrease in cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to a decrease in cash inflows from the utilization of the operating partnership’s accounts receivable securitization, which is nearly offset by the improved results of operations as discussed above. The operating partnership used $52.3 million in working capital during fiscal 2006 compared to $52.2 million during fiscal 2005. The operating partnership’s working capital requirements for inventory purchases increased $54.9 million during fiscal 2006. This increase was offset primarily due to the timing of accounts receivable collections and accounts payable disbursements.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $51.3 million for fiscal 2006, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $75.2 million for the prior year period. In fiscal 2005, we received $144.0 million of cash proceeds related to the sale of discontinued operations. See Note E — Discontinued operations — in our consolidated financial statements for further discussion about this sale of assets.

 

Acquisitions

 

During fiscal 2006, we used $21.2 million in cash for the acquisition of propane businesses as compared to $23.9 million in cash in the prior year period.

 

Capital expenditures

 

We made cash capital expenditures of $43.4 million during fiscal 2006 as compared to $52.8 million in the prior year period. This decrease is primarily due to lower capital expenditures required for our technology platform and lower maintenance capital expenditures, partially offset by higher expenditures for the growth of tank exchange operations. Capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 consisted primarily of expenditures for distribution of propane by portable tank exchange, customer storage, and vehicle replacement and betterment.

 

We lease property, computer equipment, propane tanks, light and medium duty trucks, truck tractors and transport trailers. We believe leasing is a cost-effective method for meeting our equipment needs. During fiscal 2006, we purchased $1.2 million of vehicles whose lease terms expired during fiscal 2006.

 

Financing Activities

 

During fiscal 2006, net cash used in financing activities was $45.7 million compared to net cash used in financing activities of $164.1 million for the prior year period. In fiscal 2005, we retired $109.0 million of fixed rate senior notes originally due August 1, 2005.

 

Distributions

 

We paid the minimum quarterly distributions on all common units, as well as general partner interests, totaling $122.2 million during fiscal 2006 in connection with the distributions declared for the three months ended July 31, 2005, October 31, 2005, January 31, 2006, and April 30, 2006. The minimum quarterly distribution on all common units and related general partner distributions for the three months ended July 31, 2006 of $31.7 million was paid on September 14, 2006 to holders of record on September 7, 2006.

August 2006 principal payment and common unit offering

 

During August 2006, we made scheduled principal payments of $37.0 million on our 7.08% senior notes and $21.0 million on our 8.68% senior notes using proceeds from borrowings on our unsecured credit facility. On August 29, 2006, we used $46.1 million primarily from the issuance of 1.9 million common units to Ferrell Companies to retire a portion of the $58 million borrowed under the unsecured bank credit facility. The common units were issued pursuant to Ferrellgas Partners’ Direct Investment Plan. See Note R — Subsequent event — for additional discussion about these transactions.

 

Bank credit facility

 

During August 2006, we executed a Commitment Increase Agreement to our existing unsecured bank credit facility, increasing the borrowing capacity from $365.0 million to $375.0 million. See Note R — Subsequent event — to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

 

At July 31, 2006, $98.1 million of borrowings and $48.9 million of letters of credit were outstanding under our unsecured bank credit facility, which will mature April 22, 2010, unless extended or renewed. Letters of credit are currently used to cover obligations primarily relating to requirements for insurance coverage and, to a lesser extent, risk management activities and product purchases. At July 31, 2006, we had $218.0 million available for working capital, acquisition, capital expenditure and general partnership purposes under our unsecured bank credit facility.

 

All borrowings under our unsecured bank credit facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either:

 

 

In addition, an annual commitment fee is payable on the daily unused portion of our unsecured bank credit facility at a per annum rate varying from 0.375% to 0.500% (as of July 31, 2006, the commitment fee per annum rate was 0.375%).

 

We believe that the liquidity available from our unsecured bank credit facility and our accounts receivable securitization facility will be sufficient to meet our future working capital needs for fiscal 2007 and 2008. See “Operating Activities” for discussion about our accounts receivable securitization facility. However, if we were to experience an unexpected significant increase in working capital requirements, our working capital needs could exceed our immediately available resources. Events that could cause increases in working capital borrowings or letter of credit requirements include, but are not limited to the following:

 

 

If one or more of these or other events caused a significant use of available funding, we may consider alternatives to provide increased working capital funding. No assurances can be given, however, that such alternatives would be available, or, if available, could be implemented.

The operating partnership

 

The financing activities discussed above also apply to the operating partnership except for cash flows related to distributions and contributions received, as discussed below.

 

Distributions paid by the operating partnership

 

The operating partnership paid quarterly distributions totaling $147.4 million during fiscal 2006 to Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. and our general partner. On September 14, 2006, the operating partnership paid a cash distribution to Ferrellgas Partners and our general partner totaling $32.1 million.

 

Contributions received by the operating partnership

 

During December 2005, the operating partnership received cash contributions of $1.5 million and $16 thousand from Ferrellgas Partners and our general partner, respectively. The operating partnership used these contributions to reduce borrowings under its unsecured bank credit facility.

 

During August 2006, the operating partnership made scheduled principal payments of $37.0 million on its 7.08% senior notes and $21.0 million on its 8.68% senior notes using proceeds from borrowings on its unsecured credit facility. On August 29, 2006, the operating partnership received cash contributions of $45.6 million and $0.5 million from Ferrellgas Partners and the general partner, respectively, primarily in connection with the issuance by Ferrellgas Partners of 1.9 million common units to Ferrell Companies. These proceeds were used to retire a portion of the $58 million borrowed under the unsecured bank credit facility. The common units were issued pursuant to Ferrellgas Partners’ Direct Investment Plan. See Note Q — Subsequent event — for additional discussion about these transactions.

 

Disclosures about Effects of Transactions with Related Parties

 

We have no employees and are managed and controlled by our general partner. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, our general partner is entitled to reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses incurred or payments it makes on our behalf, and all other necessary or appropriate expenses allocable to us or otherwise reasonably incurred by our general partner in connection with operating our business. These reimbursable costs, which totaled $227.4 million for fiscal 2006, include compensation and benefits paid to employees of our general partner who perform services on our behalf, as well as related general and administrative costs.

 

Ferrell Companies is the sole shareholder of our general partner and owns 20.1 million of our common units. FCI Trading is wholly-owned by Ferrell Companies and owns 0.2 million of our common units. Ferrell Propane, Inc. is wholly-owned by our general partner and owns 0.1 million of our common units.

 

In June 2005, all of the issued and outstanding senior units and the accumulated and unpaid distributions on those senior units were together converted into 3.9 million common units. James E. Ferrell, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner, was the beneficial holder of all of Ferrellgas Partners’ issued and outstanding senior units. In fiscal 2006, Mr. Ferrell exercised options for 120 thousand common units. Subsequent to the conversion of senior units and exercise of options, Mr. Ferrell indirectly owns 4.3 million common units of Ferrellgas Partners. See Note K — Partners’ capital — to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion about the conversion of senior units to common units.

 

Ferrellgas Partners paid the following common unit distributions declared for the three months ended July 31, 2005, October 31, 2005, January 31, 2006, and April 30, 2006:

 

Also during fiscal 2006, Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership together paid the general partner distributions of $2.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2005, October 31, 2005, January 31, 2006, and April 30, 2006.

 

On August 23, 2006, Ferrellgas declared distributions to Ferrell Companies, FCI Trading, Ferrell Propane and Mr. Ferrell (indirectly) of $10.0 million, $0.1 million, $26 thousand and $2.1 million, respectively, that were paid on September 14, 2006.

 

On August 29, 2006, Ferrellgas Partners received proceeds of $44.1 million, net of issuance costs, from the issuance of 1.9 million common units to Ferrell Companies pursuant to Ferrellgas Partners’ Direct Investment Plan. As a result of this issuance, Ferrell Companies owns approximately 32% of Ferrellgas Partners’ outstanding common units. Ferrellgas used the net proceeds, together with contributions made by the general partner of $0.5 million to reduce borrowings outstanding under the unsecured bank credit facility.

 

During September 2006, we authorized the payment of $0.3 million to the benefit of Mr. Andrew J. Filipowski pursuant to the indemnification provisions of Blue Rhino Corporation’s former bylaws and the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Blue Rhino Corporation. Mr. Filipowski is the brother-in-law of Mr. Billy D. Prim, a member of our general partner’s Board of Directors and Special Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of our general partner.

 

Ferrell International Limited is beneficially owned by Mr. Ferrell and thus is an affiliate. Prior to 2006, we occasionally entered into transactions with Ferrell International in connection with our risk management activities and did so at market prices in accordance with our affiliate trading policy approved by our general partner’s Board of Directors. These transactions included forward, option and swap contracts and were all reviewed for compliance with the policy. During fiscal 2006, we did not recognize any net gains or losses on sales from purchases, sales and commodity derivative transactions. We provide limited accounting services to Ferrell International. During fiscal 2006, we recognized net receipts from providing limited accounting services of $37 thousand. There was $7 thousand due from Ferrell International at July 31, 2006.

 

We believe these related party transactions were under terms that were no less favorable to us than those available with third parties.

 

See Note M — Transactions with related parties — to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion regarding the effects of transactions with related parties.

 

Contractual obligations

 

In the performance of our operations, we are bound by certain contractual obligations.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at July 31, 2006:

 

 

Historically, we have been successful in renewing certain leases that are subject to buyouts. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in the future.

 

 

 

The operating partnership

 

The contractual obligation table above also applies to the operating partnership, except for long-term debt, including current portion and fixed rate interest obligations, which are summarized in the table below:

 

 

 

 

Off-balance sheet financing arrangements

 

In this section we discuss our off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. An off-balance sheet arrangement is any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement involving an unconsolidated entity under which a company has

 

 

In September 2000, we formed a qualified special purpose entity as a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary and entered into a receivables facility arrangement, which we renewed in June 2006. This arrangement with a financial institution allows us to sell between $85.0 million and $160.0 million of accounts receivable, depending upon the time of year and available undivided interests in our accounts receivable from certain customers. We believe this facility improves cash flows while serving as a source of liquidity for our operations. See Note B — Summary of

significant accounting policies — and Note H — Accounts receivable securitization — in our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion about this arrangement.

 

Our off-balance sheet arrangements also include the leasing of transportation equipment, property, computer equipment and propane tanks. We account for these arrangements as operating leases. We believe these arrangements are a cost-effective method for financing our equipment needs. These off-balance sheet arrangements enable us to lease equipment from third parties rather than, among other options, purchasing the equipment using on-balance sheet financing.

 

Most of the operating leases involving our transportation equipment contain residual value guarantees. These transportation equipment lease arrangements are scheduled to expire over the next seven years. Most of these arrangements provide that the fair value of the equipment will equal or exceed a guaranteed amount, or we will be required to pay the lessor the difference. Although the fair values at the end of the lease terms have historically exceeded these guaranteed amounts, the maximum potential amount of aggregate future payments we could be required to make under these leasing arrangements, assuming the equipment is worthless at the end of the lease term, is currently $12.8 million. We do not know of any event, demand, commitment, trend or uncertainty that would result in a material change to these arrangements.

 

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

 

Below is a listing of recently issued accounting pronouncements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board that relate to us. Except for SFAS No. 123(R), none of these pronouncements have or are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See Note B — Summary of significant accounting policies — to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of these pronouncements.

 

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. These financial statements include some estimates and assumptions that are based on informed judgments and estimates of management. We evaluate our policies and estimates on an on-going basis and discuss the development, selection and disclosure of critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of our general partner. Predicting future events is inherently an imprecise activity and as such requires the use of judgment. Our consolidated financial statements may differ based upon different estimates and assumptions.

 

We discuss our significant accounting policies in Note B — Summary of significant accounting policies — to our consolidated financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are subject to judgments and

uncertainties that affect the application of such policies. We believe these financial statements include the most likely outcomes with regard to amounts that are based on our judgment and estimates. Our financial position and results of operations may be materially different when reported under different conditions or when using different assumptions in the application of such policies. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from the actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. We believe the following accounting policies are critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements due to the estimation process and business judgment involved in their application:

 

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

 

We calculate depreciation on property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from two to 30 years. Changes in the estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment could have a material effect on our results of operations. The estimates of the assets’ useful lives require our judgment regarding assumptions about the useful life of the assets being depreciated. When necessary, the assets are revised and the impact on depreciation is treated on a prospective basis.

 

Residual value of customer and storage tanks

 

We use an estimated residual value when calculating depreciation for our customer and bulk storage tanks. Customer and bulk storage tanks are classified as property, plant and equipment on our consolidated balance sheets. The depreciable basis of these tanks is calculated using the original cost less the residual value. Depreciation is calculated using straight-line method based on the tanks’ estimated useful life of 30 years. Changes in the estimated residual value could have a material effect on our results of operations. The estimates of the tanks’ residual value require our judgment of the value of the tanks at the end of their useful life or retirement. When necessary, the tanks’ residual values are revised and the impact on depreciation is treated on a prospective basis.

 

Valuation methods, amortization methods and estimated useful lives of intangible assets

 

The specific, identifiable intangible assets of a business enterprise depend largely upon the nature of its operations. Potential intangible assets include intellectual property such as trademarks and trade names, customer lists and relationships, and non-compete agreements, as well as other intangible assets. The approach to the valuation of each intangible asset will vary depending upon the nature of the asset, the business in which it is utilized, and the economic returns it is generating or is expected to generate. During fiscal 2006 we did not find it necessary to adjust the valuation methods used for any acquired intangible assets.

 

Our recorded intangible assets primarily include the estimated value assigned to certain customer-related and contract-based assets representing the rights we own arising from the acquisition of propane distribution companies and related contractual agreements. A customer-related or contract-based intangible with a finite useful life is amortized over its estimated useful life, which is the period over which the asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the entity. We believe that trademarks and tradenames have an indefinite useful life due to our intention to utilize all acquired trademarks and tradenames. When necessary, the intangible assets’ useful lives are revised and the impact on amortization will be reflected on a prospective basis. The determination of the fair market value of the intangible asset and the estimated useful life are based on an analysis of all pertinent factors including (1) the use of widely-accepted valuation approaches, the income approach or the cost approach, (2) the expected use of the asset by the entity, (3) the expected useful life of related assets, (4) any legal, regulatory or contractual provisions, including renewal or extension periods that would not cause substantial costs or modifications to existing agreements, (5) the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors and (6) the level of maintenance required to obtain the expected future cash flows.

 

If the underlying assumption(s) governing the amortization of an intangible asset were later determined to have significantly changed (either favorably or unfavorably), then we may be required to adjust the amortization period of such asset to reflect any new estimate of its useful life. Such a change would increase or decrease the annual amortization charge associated with the asset at that time. During fiscal 2006, we did not find it necessary to adjust the valuation method, estimated useful life or amortization period of any of our intangible assets.

Should any of the underlying assumptions indicate that the value of the intangible asset might be impaired, we may be required to reduce the carrying value and subsequent useful life of the asset. Any such write-down of the value and unfavorable change in the useful life (i.e., amortization period) of an intangible asset would increase operating costs and expenses at that time.

 

At July 31, 2006 and 2005, the carrying value of our intangible asset portfolio was $248.5 million and $255.3 million, respectively. We did not recognize any impairment losses related to our intangible assets during fiscal 2006 or 2005. For additional information regarding our intangible assets, see Note B — Summary of significant accounting policies — and Note I — Goodwill and intangible assets, net — to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Fair value of derivative commodity contracts

 

We enter into commodity forward, futures, swaps and options contracts involving propane and related products to hedge exposures to product purchase price risk. In accordance with SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” these contracts are accounted for using the fair value method. Under this valuation method, derivatives are carried in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in value recognized in cost of product sold in the consolidated statements of earnings or in other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of partners’ capital. We utilize published settlement prices for exchange-traded contracts, quotes provided by brokers and estimates of market prices based on daily contract activity to estimate the fair value of these contracts. Changes in the methods used to determine the fair value of these contracts could have a material effect on our consolidated balance sheets. For further discussion of derivative commodity contracts, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”, Note B — Summary of significant accounting policies and Note L — Derivatives — to our consolidated financial statements. We do not anticipate future changes in the methods used to determine the fair value of these derivative contracts.

 

Unit and stock-based compensation

 

We utilize a binomial option valuation tool to compute an estimated fair value of option awards at their grant date. This option valuation tool requires a number of inputs, some of which require an estimate to be made by management. Significant estimates include our computation of volatility for our stock based awards plan, the number of groups of employees participating in our unit and stock-based compensation plans, the expected term of unit and stock-based awards and the forfeiture rate of unit and stock-based awards

 

 

Subsequent events

 

During August 2006, we issued 1.9 million common units to Ferrell Companies pursuant to Ferrellgas Partners’ Direct Investment Plan. The proceeds were used to reduce borrowings outstanding under our unsecured bank credit facility. See Note R — Subsequent events — to our consolidated financial statements and “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing Activities” — for further discussion of these transactions.

 

On August 18, 2006, we executed a Commitment Increase Agreement to our Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 22, 2005 increasing the borrowing capacity available under the unsecured bank credit facility from $365.0 million to $375.0 million.

 

During October 2006, we amended the Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Ferrellgas Partners to remove the obligation of our general partner to distribute annual and quarterly reports to our unitholders. The Board of Directors of our general partner approved this amendment in light of a recent change to the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange that removed the obligation of certain public companies to distribute such reports to their security holders.

 

Our risk management trading activities include the use of energy commodity forward contracts, swaps and options traded on the over-the-counter financial markets and futures and options traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. These risk management activities are conducted primarily to offset the effect of market price fluctuations on propane inventory and purchase commitments and to mitigate the price risk on sale commitments to our customers.

 

Our risk management trading activities are intended to generate a profit, which we then apply to reduce our cost of product sold. The results of our risk management activities directly related to the delivery of propane to our customers, which include our supply procurement, storage and transportation activities, are presented in our discussion of margins and are accounted for at cost. The results of our other risk management activities are presented separately in our discussion of gross profit found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations” as risk management trading activities and are accounted for at fair value.

 

Market risks associated with energy commodities are monitored daily by senior management for compliance with our commodity risk management policy. This policy includes an aggregate dollar loss limit and limits on the term of various contracts. We also utilize volume limits for various energy commodities and review our positions daily where we remain exposed to market risk, so as to manage exposures to changing market prices.

 

We did not enter into any risk management trading activities during fiscal 2006. Our remaining market risk sensitive instruments and positions have been determined to be “other than trading”.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

Our risk management activities primarily attempt to mitigate risks related to the purchasing, storing and transporting of propane. We generally purchase propane in the contract and spot markets from major domestic energy companies on a short-term basis. Our costs to purchase and distribute propane fluctuate with the movement of market prices. This fluctuation subjects us to potential price risk, which we attempt to minimize through the use of risk management activities.

 

Our risk management activities include the use of forward contracts, futures, swaps and options to seek protection from adverse price movements and to minimize potential losses. Our hedging strategy involves taking positions in the forward or financial markets that are equal and opposite to our positions in the physical product markets in order to minimize the risk of financial loss from an adverse price change. Our hedging strategy is successful when our gains or losses in the physical product markets are offset by our losses or gains in the forward or financial markets.

 

Market risks associated with energy commodities are monitored daily by senior management for compliance with our commodity risk management policy. This policy includes an aggregate dollar loss limit and limits on the

term of various contracts. We also utilize volume limits for various energy commodities and review our positions daily where we remain exposed to market risk, so as to manage exposures to changing market prices.

 

We have prepared a sensitivity analysis to estimate the exposure to market risk of our energy commodity positions. Forward contracts, futures, swaps and options outstanding as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, that were used in our risk management activities were analyzed assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in prices for the delivery month for all energy commodities. The potential loss in future earnings from these positions due to a 10% adverse movement in market prices of the underlying energy commodities was estimated at $5.7 million and $2.3 million as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in potential loss from 2005 over 2006 is due to an increase in contracted volume as well as an increase in commodity prices. The preceding hypothetical analysis is limited because changes in prices may or may not equal 10%, thus actual results may differ.

 

Our sensitivity analysis includes designated hedging and the anticipated transactions associated with these hedging transactions. These hedging transactions are anticipated to be 100% effective; therefore, there is no effect on our sensitivity analysis from these hedging transactions. To the extent option contracts are used as hedging instruments for anticipated transactions we have included the offsetting effect of the anticipated transactions, only to the extent the option contracts are in the money, or would become in the money as a result of the 10% hypothetical movement in prices. All other anticipated transactions for risk management activities have been excluded from our sensitivity analysis.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

At July 31, 2006 and 2005, we had $98.1 million and $19.8 million, respectively, in variable rate bank credit facility borrowings. Thus, assuming a one percent increase in our variable interest rate, our interest rate risk related to the borrowings on our variable rate bank credit facility would result in a loss in future earnings of $1.0 million for fiscal 2007. The preceding hypothetical analysis is limited because changes in interest rates may or may not equal one percent, thus actual results may differ.

 

Our consolidated financial statements and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Reports thereon and the Supplementary Financial Information listed on the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules are hereby incorporated by reference. See Note Q — Quarterly data (unaudited) — to our consolidated financial statements for Selected Quarterly Financial Data.

 

None.

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

An evaluation was performed by our management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our general partner, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our general partner, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, were designed to be and were effective as of July 31, 2006.

 

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Based on the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Partnership have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management

override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Therefore, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurances of achieving our desired control objectives, and the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our general partner have concluded, as of July 31, 2006, that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in achieving that level of reasonable assurance.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

The management of Ferrellgas Partners and its subsidiaries and the operating partnership and its subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of July 31, 2006.

 

Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports which are included herein.

 

During the most recent fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a — 15(f) or Rule 15d — 15(f) of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Partners of

Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Overland Park, Kansas

 

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting, that Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Partnership maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in our opinion, the Partnership maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended July 31, 2006, of the Partnership and our report dated October 9, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.

 

 

Kansas City, Missouri

October 9, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Partners of

Ferrellgas, L.P. and Subsidiaries

Overland Park, Kansas

 

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting, that Ferrellgas, L.P. and subsidiaries (“Ferrellgas”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Ferrellgas’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of Ferrellgas’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Ferrellgas maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in our opinion, Ferrellgas maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended July 31, 2006, of Ferrellgas and our report dated October 9, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

 

 

Kansas City, Missouri

October 9, 2006

 

None.

 

Directors and executive officers of our general partner

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the directors and executive officers of our general partner as of October 3, 2006. Each of the persons named below is appointed or elected to their respective office or offices annually.

 

 

James E. Ferrell — Mr. Ferrell has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1965, when he assumed leadership from his father, company founder A.C. Ferrell. Under his leadership, Ferrellgas has grown from a small, independently owned propane company to one of the nation’s largest propane retailers. An active member of the retail propane industry, Mr. Ferrell is a past President of the World LP Gas Association and a former Chairman of the Propane Vehicle Council.

 

Stephen L. Wambold — Mr. Wambold joined our general partner in 1997 and has oversight of nationwide propane distribution operations which includes the retail propane operations, the propane tank-exchange business, and Ferrell North America. Mr. Wambold obtained his B.A. from Purdue University.

 

Eugene D. Caresia — Mr. Caresia joined our general partner in 2002 and has oversight of Human Resources. Mr. Caresia previously worked for American Century Investments as Director, Training and Organizational Development. Mr. Caresia obtained a B.S. degree and a master’s degree in Organizational Development, both from Brigham Young University.

 

M. Kevin Dobbins — Mr. Dobbins joined our general partner in 1999 and has oversight of the customer care centers, pricing, the fleet and purchasing departments and the Econogas/start-up groups. Mr. Dobbins holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Ohio State University and an MBA from City University in Bellevue, Washington.

Kevin T. Kelly — Mr. Kelly joined our general partner in 1996 and has oversight over Accounting and Financial Reporting, Internal Audit, Corporate Finance and Treasury, Investor Relations, Taxation and Payroll and Risk Management operations. Mr. Kelly is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Missouri.

 

Brian J. Kline — Mr. Kline joined our general partner in 1996 and has oversight over Acquisitions, new product development, joint business ventures and strategic alliances. Mr. Kline holds a B.S. in Geophysics from Kansas State University and an MBA from the University of Nebraska.

 

George L. Koloroutis — Mr. Koloroutis joined our general partner in 1991 and has oversight of all commodity risk management operations and propane supply and transportation services. Mr. Koloroutis is an active member of the propane industry, serving as a Councilor on the Propane Education & Research Council and a member of the National Propane Gas Association’s Infrastructure Task Force.

 

Patrick J. Walsh — Mr. Walsh joined our general partner in 1986 and has oversight over marketing, corporate communications, information technology, safety and technical operations and office services departments. A Certified Public Accountant, Mr. Walsh holds a B.S. in Accounting from Northern Arizona University and an MBA from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater.

 

Tod D. Brown — Mr. Brown joined our general partner in 2004 and has oversight for the Blue Rhino Tank Exchange business. Mr. Brown previously worked for The Coca-Cola Company where he was the Director of Distributor Sales for the Minute Maid Juice division. Mr. Brown obtained a B.A. degree from Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana.

 

William K. Hoskins — Mr. Hoskins was appointed to the Board of Directors in 2003. He chairs the Board’s Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee, and also serves on its Audit Committee. He is the Managing Partner of Resolution Counsel, LLP, a Portland, Oregon-based law firm and is President of Hoskins & Associates, a pharmaceutical and biotech consulting firm. Mr. Hoskins also serves on the Boards of Directors of Sequella, Inc.

 

A. Andrew Levison — Mr. Levison has served on the Board of Directors since 1994 and is a member of the Boards’ Compensation Committee. He is the Managing Partner of Southfield Capital Advisors, LLC, a Greenwich, Connecticut-based, private merchant banking firm and serves on the Boards of Directors of Presidio Partners, LLC, Material Handling Services, LLC, RCR International, Inc., Telco Solutions III, LLC and the Levison/Present Foundation at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City.

 

John R. Lowden — Mr. Lowden was appointed to the Board of Directors in 2003 and is a member of the Board’s Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance/Nominating Committees. He is the President of New Castle Partners, LLC, a Greenwich, Connecticut-based private investment firm. Mr. Lowden also serves as Chairman and CEO of A-l Industries, Inc. and Metpar Industries Inc. and on the Board of Directors of Apparel Ventures Inc. and the Board of Trustees of Wake Forest University.

 

Michael F. Morrissey — Mr. Morrissey has served on the Board of Directors since 1999 and chairs the Board’s Audit Committee. He is the retired Managing Partner of Ernst & Young’s Kansas City, Missouri office. Mr. Morrissey currently serves on the Board of Directors and as Audit Committee Chairman of Westar Energy, Inc. and the boards of several private companies and not-for-profit organizations.

 

Billy D. Prim — Mr. Prim was appointed to the Board in 2004 following the transaction between Ferrellgas and Blue Rhino Corporation. Mr. Prim was the co-founder and President of Blue Rhino Corporation (formerly NASDQ: RINO) and now serves as Special Advisor to Mr. Ferrell. Mr. Prim also serves on the Board of Directors of Southern Community Bank and Trust.

 

Elizabeth T. Solberg — Ms. Solberg has served on the Board of Directors since 1998. She chairs the Board’s Compensation Committee and also serves on its Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee. Ms. Solberg formerly served as Regional President and Senior Partner at Fleishman-Hillard, Inc., one of the world’s largest public relations firms and is the President of Communications Partners, LLC. Ms. Solberg serves on the Boards of Directors of Midwest Express Holdings, Inc. and other numerous civic organizations.

Corporate governance

 

The limited partnership agreements of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership provide for each partnership to be governed by a general partner rather than a board of directors. Through these partnership agreements, Ferrellgas, Inc. acts as the general partner of both Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership and thereby manages and operates the activities of Ferrellgas Partners and the operating partnership. Ferrellgas, Inc. anticipates that its activities will be limited to the management and operation of the partnerships. Neither Ferrellgas Partners nor the operating partnership directly employs any of the persons responsible for the management or operations of the partnerships, rather, these individuals are employed by the general partner.

 

The Board of Directors of our general partner has adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines for the Board and charters for its Audit Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Compensation Committee. A current copy of these Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters, each of which were adopted and approved by the entire Board, are available to our security holders on our website at www.ferrellgas.com (under the caption “Investor Relations”). Please note that the information and materials found on our website, except for SEC filings expressly incorporated by reference into this report herein, are not part of this report and are not incorporated by reference into this report.

 

Additionally, the Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Hoskins, Levison, Lowden, Morrissey and Ms. Solberg, who constitute a majority of its Directors, are “independent” as described by the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance rules. In conjunction with regular Board meetings, these five non-management directors also meet in a regularly scheduled executive session without members of management present. A non-management director presides over each executive session of non-management directors. Mr. Morrissey has been selected as the presiding director for non-management executive sessions. If Mr. Morrissey is not present then the other non-management directors shall select the presiding director. Additional executive sessions may be scheduled by a majority of the non-management directors in consolation with the presiding director and the Chairman of the Board.

 

Audit committee

 

The Board has a designated Audit Committee established in accordance with the Exchange Act comprised of Messrs. Morrissey, Hoskins and Lowden. Mr. Morrissey is the chairman of the Audit Committee and has been determined by the board to be an “audit committee financial expert.” The Audit Committee charter, as well as the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC, requires that members of the Audit Committee satisfy “independence” requirements as set out by the New York Stock Exchange. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as described under the relevant standards.

 

Limitation on directors participating on audit committees

 

The Board has adopted a policy limiting the number of public-company audit committees its directors may serve on to three at any point in time. If a director desires to serve on more than three public-company audit committees, he or she must first obtain the written permission of the Board.

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

 

The Board has a designated Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, comprised of Messrs. Hoskins, Lowden and Ms. Solberg. Mr. Hoskins is the chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter requires that members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee satisfy particular “independence” requirements. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are “independent” as described under relevant standards.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The Board has a designated Compensation Committee, comprised of Ms. Solberg, Messrs. Levison and Lowden. Ms. Solberg is chair of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee charter requires that

members of the Compensation Committee satisfy particular “independence” requirements. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” as described under relevant standards.

 

Disclosure about our security holders’ ability to communicate with the Board of Directors of our general partner