Annual Statements Open main menu

FIRST BANCORP /NC/ - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)

form10q-117428_fnbc.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
__________________

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
_______________________

Commission File Number 0-15572

 
FIRST BANCORP
 
 
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 

North Carolina
 
56-1421916
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
     
341 North Main Street, Troy, North Carolina
 
27371-0508
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
     
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
(910) 576-6171

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      T YES o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      o YES o NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

o Large Accelerated Filer
T Accelerated Filer
o Non-Accelerated Filer
o Smaller Reporting Company
   
(Do not check if a smaller
 
   
reporting company)
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      o YES T NO

The number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding on July 31, 2011 was 16,877,731.
 


 
 

 

INDEX
FIRST BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 
Page
   
Part I. Financial Information
 
   
Item 1 - Financial Statements
 
   
4
   
5
   
6
   
7
   
8
   
9
   
43
   
65
   
67
   
Part II. Other Information
 
   
68
   
69
   
69
   
71

 
Page 2


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Part I of this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualifying words (and their derivatives) such as “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” or other statements concerning our opinions or judgment about future events. Factors that could influence the accuracy of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the financial success or changing strategies of our customers, our level of success in integrating acquisitions, actions of government regulators, the level of market interest rates, and general economic conditions. For additional information that could affect the matters discussed in this paragraph, see the “Risk Factors” section of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
Page 3


Part I. Financial Information
Item 1 - Financial Statements

First Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands-unaudited)
 
June 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010 (audited)
   
June 30,
2010
 
ASSETS
                 
Cash and due from banks, noninterest-bearing
  $ 73,676       56,821       59,944  
Due from banks, interest-bearing
    163,414       154,320       148,539  
Federal funds sold
    1,157       861       5,091  
Total cash and cash equivalents
    238,247       212,002       213,574  
                         
Securities available for sale
    171,844       181,182       163,317  
Securities held to maturity (fair values of $59,860, $53,312, and $47,786)
    57,593       54,018       47,312  
                         
Presold mortgages in process of settlement
    2,466       3,962       3,123  
                         
Loans – non-covered
    2,040,714       2,083,004       2,099,099  
Loans – covered by FDIC loss share agreement
    401,726       371,128       455,477  
Total loans
    2,442,440       2,454,132       2,554,576  
Allowance for loan losses – non-covered
    (34,465 )     (38,275 )     (42,215 )
Allowance for loan losses – covered
    (5,540 )     (11,155 )  
 
Total allowance for loan losses
    (40,005 )     (49,430 )     (42,215 )
Net loans
    2,402,435       2,404,702       2,512,361  
                         
Premises and equipment
    68,898       67,741       54,026  
Accrued interest receivable
    12,000       13,579       12,975  
FDIC indemnification asset
    142,894       123,719       118,072  
Goodwill
    65,835       65,835       65,835  
Other intangible assets
    4,349       4,523       4,962  
Other real estate owned – non-covered
    31,849       21,081       14,690  
Other real estate owned – covered
    102,883       94,891       80,074  
Other
    32,456       31,697       28,021  
Total assets
  $ 3,333,749       3,278,932       3,318,342  
                         
LIABILITIES
                       
Deposits:   Demand - noninterest-bearing
  $ 323,223       292,759       293,555  
NOW accounts
    371,693       292,623       356,626  
Money market accounts
    499,286       500,360       494,979  
Savings accounts
    145,576       153,325       157,343  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    765,787       762,990       782,663  
Other time deposits
    641,853       650,456       709,722  
Total deposits
    2,747,418       2,652,513       2,794,888  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    68,608       54,460       61,766  
Borrowings
    138,796       196,870       76,579  
Accrued interest payable
    2,208       2,082       2,665  
Other liabilities
    24,421       28,404       33,706  
Total liabilities
    2,981,451       2,934,329       2,969,604  
                         
Commitments and contingencies
                       
                         
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Preferred stock, no par value per share. Authorized: 5,000,000 shares
                       
Issued and outstanding: 65,000 shares
    65,000       65,000       65,000  
Discount on preferred stock
    (2,474 )     (2,932 )     (3,361 )
Common stock, no par value per share. Authorized: 40,000,000 shares
                       
Issued and outstanding: 16,862,536, 16,801,426, and 16,770,119 shares
    100,549       99,615       98,973  
Common stock warrants
    4,592       4,592       4,592  
Retained earnings
    188,737       183,413       186,552  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (4,106 )     (5,085 )     (3,018 )
Total shareholders’ equity
    352,298       344,603       348,738  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 3,333,749       3,278,932       3,318,342  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
Page 4


First Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income

($ in thousands, except share data-unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
INTEREST INCOME
                       
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 38,464       37,609       75,271       75,827  
Interest on investment securities:
                               
Taxable interest income
    1,463       1,579       2,895       3,109  
Tax-exempt interest income
    499       409       999       763  
Other, principally overnight investments
    103       121       193       328  
Total interest income
    40,529       39,718       79,358       80,027  
                                 
INTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Savings, NOW and money market
    1,103       1,664       2,333       3,528  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    2,661       3,182       5,265       6,654  
Other time deposits
    1,767       2,825       3,936       6,049  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    48       70       98       184  
Borrowings
    470       441       932       899  
Total interest expense
    6,049       8,182       12,564       17,314  
                                 
Net interest income
    34,480       31,536       66,794       62,713  
Provision for loan losses – non-covered
    7,607       8,003       15,177       15,626  
Provision for loan losses – covered
    3,327    
      7,100    
 
Total provision for loan losses
    10,934       8,003       22,277       15,626  
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    23,546       23,533       44,517       47,087  
                                 
NONINTEREST INCOME
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    3,655       3,593       6,609       7,058  
Other service charges, commissions and fees
    1,709       1,378       3,315       2,755  
Fees from presold mortgages
    346       440       641       812  
Commissions from sales of insurance and financial products
    409       340       764       762  
Gain from acquisition
 
   
      10,196    
 
Foreclosed property losses and write-downs – non-covered
    (271 )     (96 )     (1,624 )     (51 )
Foreclosed property losses and write-downs – covered
    (2,583 )     (5,495 )     (7,517 )     (5,495 )
FDIC indemnification asset income, net
    1,826       4,396       6,866       4,396  
Securities gains
    60       15       74       24  
Other gains (losses)
    (37 )     (34 )     (17 )     (30 )
Total noninterest income
    5,114       4,537       19,307       10,231  
                                 
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
                               
Salaries
    9,694       8,735       19,405       17,351  
Employee benefits
    2,954       2,589       6,156       5,073  
Total personnel expense
    12,648       11,324       25,561       22,424  
Net occupancy expense
    1,598       1,752       3,270       3,640  
Equipment related expenses
    1,110       1,063       2,172       2,202  
Intangibles amortization
    226       220       450       435  
Merger expenses
    243    
      594    
 
Other operating expenses
    7,088       7,598       15,909       15,536  
Total noninterest expenses
    22,913       21,957       47,956       44,237  
                                 
Income before income taxes
    5,747       6,113       15,868       13,081  
Income taxes
    2,021       2,172       5,767       4,702  
                                 
Net income
    3,726       3,941       10,101       8,379  
                                 
Preferred stock dividends and accretion
    (1,041 )     (1,026 )     (2,083 )     (2,053 )
                                 
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 2,685       2,915       8,018       6,326  
                                 
Earnings per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.16       0.17       0.48       0.38  
Diluted
    0.16       0.17       0.48       0.38  
                                 
Dividends declared per common share
  $ 0.08       0.08       0.16       0.16  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    16,841,289       16,751,962       16,827,615       16,742,240  
Diluted
    16,868,571       16,784,126       16,855,027       16,772,969  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
Page 5


First Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
   
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
($ in thousands-unaudited)
 
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
Net income
  $ 3,726       3,941       10,101       8,379  
Other comprehensive income (loss):
                               
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale:
                               
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period, pretax
    1,198       1,190       1,387       2,085  
Tax benefit
    (467 )     (464 )     (541 )     (813 )
Reclassification to realized gains
    (60 )     (15 )     (74 )     (24 )
Tax expense
    23       5       29       9  
Postretirement Plans:
                               
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss
    140       117       280       234  
Tax expense
    (56 )     (46 )     (112 )     (92 )
Amortization of prior service cost and transition obligation
    9       9       18       18  
Tax expense
    (4 )     (4 )     (8 )     (8 )
Other comprehensive income
    783       792       979       1,409  
Comprehensive income
  $ 4,509       4,733       11,080       9,788  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
Page 6


First Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except per share –
       
Preferred
   
Common Stock
   
Common
         
Accumulated
Other
   
Total
Share-
 
unaudited)
 
 
Preferred
Stock
   
Stock
Discount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Stock
Warrants
   
Retained
Earnings
   
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   
holders’
Equity
 
                                                 
                                                 
Balances, January 1, 2010
  $ 65,000       (3,789 )     16,722     $ 98,099       4,592       182,908       (4,427 )     342,383  
                                                                 
Net income
                                            8,379               8,379  
Common stock issued under
stock option plans
                    17       171                               171  
Common stock issued into
dividend reinvestment plan
                    15       226                               226  
Cash dividends declared ($0.16
per common share)
                                            (2,682 )             (2,682 )
Preferred dividends
                                            (1,625 )             (1,625 )
Accretion of preferred stock
discount
            428                               (428 )              
Tax benefit realized from
exercise of nonqualified stock
options
                            36                               36  
Stock-based compensation
                    16       441                               441  
Other comprehensive income
                                                    1,409       1,409  
                                                                 
Balances, June 30, 2010
  $ 65,000       (3,361 )     16,770     $ 98,973       4,592       186,552       (3,018 )     348,738  
                                                                 
                                                                 
Balances, January 1, 2011
  $ 65,000       (2,932 )     16,801     $ 99,615       4,592       183,413       (5,085 )     344,603  
                                                                 
Net income
                                            10,101               10,101  
Common stock issued under
stock option plans
                    2       30                               30  
Common stock issued into
dividend reinvestment plan
                    30       421                               421  
Cash dividends declared ($0.16
per common share)
                                            (2,694 )             (2,694 )
Preferred dividends
                                            (1,625 )             (1,625 )
Accretion of preferred stock
discount
            458                               (458 )              
Stock-based compensation
                    29       483                               483  
Other comprehensive income
                                                    979       979  
                                                                 
Balances, June 30, 2011
  $ 65,000       (2,474 )     16,862     $ 100,549       4,592       188,737       (4,106 )     352,298  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
Page 7


First Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
($ in thousands-unaudited)
 
2011
   
2010
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
           
Net income
  $ 10,101       8,379  
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    22,277       15,626  
Net security premium amortization
    748       765  
Purchase accounting accretion and amortization, net
    (6,565 )     (5,192 )
Gain from acquisition
    (10,196 )  
 
Foreclosed property losses and write-downs
    9,141       5,546  
Gain on securities available for sale
    (74 )     (24 )
Other losses
    17       30  
Increase in net deferred loan costs
    (323 )     (317 )
Depreciation of premises and equipment
    2,182       1,974  
Stock-based compensation expense
    483       441  
Amortization of intangible assets
    450       435  
Origination of presold mortgages in process of settlement
    (35,532 )     (38,379 )
Proceeds from sales of presold mortgages in process of settlement
    37,028       39,223  
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
    1,579       1,808  
Increase in other assets
    (6,866 )     (10,836 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
    126       (389 )
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
    (5,238 )     9,270  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    19,338       28,360  
                 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
               
Purchases of securities available for sale
    (23,721 )     (33,282 )
Purchases of securities held to maturity
    (3,816 )     (15,173 )
Proceeds from maturities/issuer calls of securities available for sale
    34,829       51,079  
Proceeds from maturities/issuer calls of securities held to maturity
    1,053       2,235  
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
    2,518    
 
Net decrease in loans
    45,905       42,703  
Proceeds from FDIC loss share agreements
    32,468       21,192  
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate
    16,425       10,030  
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (3,323 )     (1,809 )
Net cash received (paid) in acquisition
    54,037       (170 )
Net cash provided by investing activities
    156,375       76,805  
                 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
               
Net decrease in deposits and repurchase agreements
    (83,523 )     (138,597 )
Repayments of borrowings, net
    (62,081 )     (100,000 )
Cash dividends paid – common stock
    (2,690 )     (2,674 )
Cash dividends paid – preferred stock
    (1,625 )     (1,625 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    451       397  
Tax benefit from exercise of nonqualified stock options
          36  
Net cash used by financing activities
    (149,468 )     (242,463 )
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    26,245       (137,298 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    212,002       350,872  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 238,247       213,574  
                 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $ 12,438       17,703  
Income taxes
    11,710       7,569  
Non-cash transactions:
               
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes
    801       1,257  
Foreclosed loans transferred to other real estate
    42,984       52,151  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
Page 8


First Bancorp and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)
For the Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
 

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. All such adjustments were of a normal, recurring nature. Reference is made to the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for a discussion of accounting policies and other relevant information with respect to the financial statements. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.

Note 2 – Accounting Policies

Note 1 to the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC contains a description of the accounting policies followed by the Company and discussion of recent accounting pronouncements. The following paragraphs update that information as necessary.

In July 2010, the FASB issued guidance that requires an entity to provide more information about the credit quality of its financing receivables, such as aging information, credit quality indicators and troubled debt restructurings, in the disclosures to its financial statements. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on how the entity develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure. Except for disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings (discussed in next paragraph), the required disclosures became effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The Company is required to include these disclosures in its interim and annual financial statements. See Note 8 for required disclosures.

In April 2011, the FASB issued guidance to assist creditors with their determination of when a restructuring is a troubled debt restructuring. The determination is based on whether the restructuring constitutes a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, as both events must be present. This guidance and the new disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings will be effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2011.

In December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance to modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings upon adoption. Impairments occurring subsequent to adoption should be included in earnings. The amendment was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2011 and is not expected to impact the Company’s next goodwill impairment test.

Also in December 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance specifying that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendment also requires that the supplemental pro forma disclosures include a description of the nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This amendment

 
Page 9


is effective for the Company for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2011.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3 – Reclassifications

Certain amounts reported in the period ended June 30, 2010 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for June 30, 2011. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity for the periods presented, nor did they materially impact trends in financial information.

Note 4 – Acquisition of Bank of Asheville

On January 21, 2011, the Company announced that First Bank, its banking subsidiary, had entered into a loss share purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver for The Bank of Asheville, Asheville, North Carolina. Earlier that day, the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks issued an order for the closure of The Bank of Asheville and appointed the FDIC as receiver. According to the terms of the agreement, First Bank acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of The Bank of Asheville. All deposits were assumed by First Bank with no losses to any depositor.

The Bank of Asheville operated through five branches in Asheville, North Carolina with total assets of approximately $198 million and 50 employees.

Substantially all of the loans and foreclosed real estate purchased are covered by loss share agreements between the FDIC and First Bank, which afford First Bank significant loss protection. Under the loss share agreements, the FDIC will cover 80% of covered loan and foreclosed real estate losses. The term for loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on non-residential real estate loans is five years in respect to losses and eight years in respect to loss recoveries. The reimbursable losses from the FDIC are based on the book value of the relevant loan as determined by the FDIC at the date of the transaction. New loans made after that date are not covered by the loss share agreements.

First Bank received a $23.9 million discount on the assets acquired and paid no deposit premium. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. The statement of net assets acquired as of January 21, 2011 and the resulting gain are presented in the following table. The purchased assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values, and identifiable intangible assets were recorded at fair value. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. The Company recorded an estimated receivable from the FDIC in the amount of $42.2 million, which represents the fair value of the FDIC’s portion of the losses that are expected to be incurred and reimbursed to the Company.

An acquisition gain totaling $10.2 million resulted from the acquisition and is included as a component of noninterest income on the statement of income. The amount of the gain is equal to the amount by which the fair value of assets purchased exceeded the fair value of liabilities assumed.

 
Page 10


The statement of net assets acquired as of January 21, 2011 and the resulting gain that was recorded are presented in the following table.

 
($ in thousands)
 
 
As
Recorded by
The Bank of
Asheville
   
Fair
Value
Adjustments
   
As
Recorded by
the Company
 
Assets
                 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 27,297             27,297  
Securities
    4,461             4,461  
Loans
    153,994       (51,726 ) (a)     102,268  
Core deposit intangible
          277 (b)     277  
FDIC indemnification asset
          42,218 (c)     42,218  
Foreclosed properties
    3,501       (2,159 ) (d)     1,342  
Other assets
    1,146       (370 ) (e)     776  
Total
    190,399       (11,760 )     178,639  
                         
Liabilities
                       
Deposits
    192,284       460 (f)     192,744  
Borrowings
    4,004       77 (g)     4,081  
Other
    111       1,447 (h)     1,558  
Total
    196,399       1,984       198,383  
                         
Excess of liabilities received over assets
    (6,000 )     (13,744 )     (19,744 )
Less: Asset discount
    (23,940 )                
Cash received/receivable from FDIC at closing
    29,940               29,940  
                         
Total gain recorded
                  $ 10,196  

Explanation of Fair Value Adjustments
 
(a)
This estimated adjustment is necessary as of the acquisition date to write down The Bank of Asheville’s book value of loans to the estimated fair value as a result of future expected loan losses.

 
(b)
This fair value adjustment represents the value of the core deposit base assumed in the acquisition based on a study performed by an independent consulting firm. This amount was recorded by the Company as an identifiable intangible asset and will be amortized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the average life of the core deposit base, which is estimated to be seven years.

 
(c)
This adjustment is the estimated fair value of the amount that the Company expects to receive from the FDIC under its loss share agreements as a result of future loan losses.

 
(d)
This is the estimated adjustment necessary to write down The Bank of Asheville’s book value of foreclosed real estate properties to their estimated fair value as of the acquisition date.

 
(e)
This is an immaterial adjustment made to reflect fair value.

 
(f)
This fair value adjustment was recorded because the weighted average interest rate of The Bank of Asheville’s time deposits exceeded the cost of similar wholesale funding at the time of the acquisition. This amount will be amortized to reduce interest expense on a declining basis over the life of the portfolio of approximately 48 months.

 
Page 11


 
(g)
This fair value adjustment was recorded because the interest rates of The Bank of Asheville’s fixed rate borrowings exceeded current interest rates on similar borrowings. This amount was realized shortly after the acquisition by prepaying the borrowings at a premium and thus there will be no future amortization related to this adjustment.

 
(h)
This adjustment relates primarily to the estimate of what the Company will owe to the FDIC at the conclusion of the loss share agreements based on a pre-established formula set forth in those agreements that is based on total expected losses in relation to the amount of the discount bid.

The operating results of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2011 include the operating results of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities for the period subsequent to the acquisition date of January 21, 2011 and were not material to the six month period ended June 30, 2011. Due primarily to the significant amount of fair value adjustments and the FDIC loss share agreements now in place, historical results of The Bank of Asheville are not believed to be relevant to the Company’s results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.

Note 5 – Equity-Based Compensation Plans

At June 30, 2011, the Company had the following equity-based compensation plans: the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan, the First Bancorp 2004 Stock Option Plan, the First Bancorp 1994 Stock Option Plan, and one plan that was assumed from an acquired entity. The Company’s shareholders approved all equity-based compensation plans, except for those assumed from acquired companies. The First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan became effective upon the approval of shareholders on May 2, 2007. As of June 30, 2011, the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan was the only plan that had shares available for future grants.

The First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan and its predecessor plans, the First Bancorp 2004 Stock Option Plan and the First Bancorp 1994 Stock Option Plan (“Predecessor Plans”), are intended to serve as a means to attract, retain and motivate key employees and directors and to associate the interests of the plans’ participants with those of the Company and its shareholders. The Predecessor Plans only provided for the ability to grant stock options, whereas the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan, in addition to providing for grants of stock options, also allows for grants of other types of equity-based compensation, including stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted performance stock, unrestricted stock, and performance units. Since the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan became effective on May 2, 2007, the Company has granted the following stock-based compensation: 1) the grant of 2,250 stock options to each of the Company’s non-employee directors on June 1, 2007, 2008, and 2009, 2) the grant of 5,000 incentive stock options to an executive officer on April 1, 2008 in connection with a corporate acquisition, 3) the grant of 262,599 stock options and 81,337 performance units to 19 senior officers on June 17, 2008 (each performance unit represents the right to acquire one share of the Company’s common stock upon satisfaction of the vesting conditions), 4) the grant of 29,267 long-term restricted shares of common stock to certain senior executive officers on December 11, 2009, 5) the grant of 1,039 shares of common stock to each of the Company’s non-employee directors on June 1, 2010, 6) the grant of 7,259 long-term restricted shares of common stock to certain senior executive officers on February 24, 2011, and 7) the grant of 1,414 shares of common stock to each of the Company’s non-employee directors on June 1, 2011.

Prior to the June 17, 2008 grant, stock option grants to employees generally had five-year vesting schedules (20% vesting each year) and had been irregular, usually falling into three categories - 1) to attract and retain new employees, 2) to recognize changes in responsibilities of existing employees, and 3) to periodically reward exemplary performance. Compensation expense associated with these types of grants is recorded pro-ratably over the vesting period. As it relates to directors, until 2010 the Company had historically granted 2,250 vested stock options to each of the Company’s non-employee directors in June of each year. In June 2011 and 2010, the Company granted 1,414 common shares and 1,039 common shares, respectively, to each non-employee director, which had approximately the same value as 2,250 stock options. Compensation expense associated with these director grants is recognized on the date of grant since there are no vesting conditions.

 
Page 12


The June 17, 2008 grant of a combination of performance units and stock options have both performance conditions (earnings per share targets) and service conditions that must be met in order to vest. The 262,599 stock options and 81,337 performance units represent the maximum number of options and performance units that could have vested if the Company were to achieve specified maximum goals for earnings per share during the three annual performance periods ending on December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010. Up to one-third of the total number of options and performance units granted are subject to vesting annually as of December 31 of each year beginning in 2010, if (1) the Company achieves specific earnings per share (EPS) goals during the corresponding performance period and (2) the executive or key employee continues employment for a period of two years beyond the corresponding performance period. Compensation expense for this grant is recorded over the various service periods based on the estimated number of options and performance units that are probable to vest. If the awards do not vest, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost will be reversed. The Company did not achieve the minimum earnings per share performance goal for 2008 or 2010, and thus two-thirds of the above grant has been permanently forfeited. As a result of the significant acquisition gain realized in June 2009 related to a failed bank acquisition, the Company achieved the EPS goal for 2009 and the related awards will vest on December 31, 2011 for each grantee that remains employed as of that date. The Company recorded compensation expense of $299,000 in each of 2009 and 2010 related to this grant and its expected vesting. Assuming no forfeitures, the Company will record compensation expense of approximately $75,000 in each quarter of 2011 related to this grant.

The December 11, 2009 and February 24, 2011 grants of long-term restricted shares of common stock to senior executives vest in accordance with the minimum rules for long-term equity grants for companies participating in the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). These rules require that the vesting of the stock be tied to repayment of the financial assistance. For each 25% of total financial assistance repaid, 25% of the total long-term restricted stock may become transferrable. The total compensation expense associated with the December 11, 2009 grant was $398,000 and is being initially amortized over a four-year period. The amount of compensation expense recorded by the Company in 2009 was insignificant. The Company recorded approximately $49,000 in each of the first six months of 2011 and 2010 related to this grant. The Company will continue to record approximately $24,500 in each quarter through the end of 2013 related to the 2009 grant. The total compensation expense associated with the February 24, 2011 grant was $105,500 and is being initially amortized over a three-year period, with approximately $8,800 being expensed in each quarter of 2011-2013. See Note 15 for further information related to the Company’s participation in the TARP.

Under the terms of the Predecessor Plans and the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan, options can have a term of no longer than ten years, and all options granted thus far under these plans have had a term of ten years. The Company’s options provide for immediate vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the plans).

At June 30, 2011, there were 635,309 options outstanding related to the three First Bancorp plans, with exercise prices ranging from $14.35 to $22.12. At June 30, 2011, there were 927,478 shares remaining available for grant under the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan. The Company also has a stock option plan as a result of a corporate acquisition. At June 30, 2011, there were 4,788 stock options outstanding in connection with the acquired plan, with option prices ranging from $10.66 to $15.22.

The Company issues new shares of common stock when options are exercised.

The Company measures the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company determines the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model as follows: the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant; the dividend yield is based on the Company’s dividend yield at the time of the grant (subject to adjustment if the dividend yield on the grant date is not expected to approximate the dividend yield over the expected life of the option); the volatility factor is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock (subject to adjustment if future volatility is reasonably expected to differ from the past); and the weighted-average expected life is based on the historical behavior of employees related to exercises, forfeitures and cancellations.

 
Page 13


The Company’s equity grants for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were the issuance of 1) 7,259 shares of long-term restricted stock to certain senior executives on February 24, 2011, at a fair market value of $14.54 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date, and 2) 21,210 shares of common stock to non-employee directors on June 1, 2011 (1,414 shares per director), at a fair market value of $11.39 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date.

The Company’s only equity grants for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were the issuance of 15,585 shares of common stock to non-employee directors on June 1, 2010 (1,039 shares per director). The fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date was $15.51 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date.

The Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of $483,000 and $441,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded as “salaries expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Income and as an adjustment to cash flows from operating activities on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company recognized no income tax benefits in the income statement related to stock-based compensation for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 and approximately $36,000 in income tax benefits for the same period in 2010.

At June 30, 2011, the Company had $10,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options that have vesting requirements based solely on service conditions. The cost is expected to be amortized over a weighted-average life of 1.8 years, with $3,000 being expensed in 2011, $6,000 being expensed in 2012, and $1,000 being expensed in 2013. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $149,000 in unrecognized compensation expense associated with the June 17, 2008 award grant that has both performance conditions and service conditions and will record $74,500 in each remaining quarter of 2011.

As noted above, certain of the Company’s stock option grants contain terms that provide for a graded vesting schedule whereby portions of the award vest in increments over the requisite service period. The Company has elected to recognize compensation expense for awards with graded vesting schedules on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Compensation expense is based on the estimated number of stock options and awards that will ultimately vest. Over the past five years, there have only been minimal amounts of forfeitures or expirations, and therefore the Company assumes that all options granted without performance conditions will become vested.

 
Page 14


The following table presents information regarding the activity for the first six months of 2011 related to all of the Company’s stock options outstanding:

   
Options Outstanding
 
   
Number of
Shares
   
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   
Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Term (years)
   
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
                         
                         
Balance at December 31, 2010
    642,413     $ 18.11              
                             
Granted
                       
Exercised
    (2,300 )     13.30           $ 6,949  
Forfeited
                         
Expired
                         
                               
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
    640,113     $ 18.13       3.3     $ 0  
                                 
Exercisable at June 30, 2011
    567,167     $ 18.32       2.8     $ 0  

The Company received $30,000 and $171,000 as a result of stock option exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company recorded no tax benefits from the exercise of nonqualified stock options during the three months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.

As discussed above, the Company granted 81,337 performance units to 19 senior officers on June 17, 2008. Each performance unit represents the right to acquire one share of the Company’s common stock upon satisfaction of the vesting conditions (discussed above). The fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date was $16.53 per share. One-third of this grant was forfeited on December 31, 2008 and another one-third was forfeited on December 31, 2010 because the Company failed to meet the minimum performance goal required for vesting. Also, as discussed above, the Company granted 29,267 and 7,259 long-term restricted shares of common stock to certain senior executives on December 11, 2009 and February 24, 2011, respectively.

The following table presents information regarding the activity during 2011 related to the Company’s outstanding performance units and restricted stock:

   
Nonvested Performance Units
   
Long-Term Restricted Stock
 
Six months ended June 30, 2011
 
Number of
Units
   
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
   
Number of
Units
   
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 
Nonvested at the beginning of the period
    27,113     $ 16.53       29,267     $ 13.59  
Granted during the period
                7,259       14.54  
Vested during the period
                       
Forfeited or expired during the period
                       
Nonvested at end of period
    27,113     $ 16.53       36,526     $ 13.78  

Note 6 – Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share were computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share includes the potentially dilutive effects of the Company’s equity plans and the warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection with the Company’s participation in the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program – see Note 15 for additional information. The

 
Page 15


following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted earnings per common share:

   
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
($ in thousands except per
share amounts)
 
Income
(Numer-
ator)
   
Shares
(Denom-
inator)
   
Per Share
Amount
   
Income
(Numer-
ator)
   
Shares
(Denom-
inator)
   
Per Share
Amount
 
                                     
Basic EPS
                                   
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 2,685       16,841,289     $ 0.16     $ 2,915       16,751,962     $ 0.17  
                                                 
Effect of Dilutive Securities
    -       27,282               -       32,164          
                                                 
Diluted EPS per common share
  $ 2,685       16,868,571     $ 0.16     $ 2,915       16,784,126     $ 0.17  


   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
($ in thousands except per
share amounts)
 
Income
(Numer-
ator)
   
Shares
(Denom-
inator)
   
Per Share
Amount
   
Income
(Numer-
ator)
   
Shares
(Denom-
inator)
   
Per Share
Amount
 
                                     
Basic EPS
                                   
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 8,018       16,827,615     $ 0.48     $ 6,326       16,742,240     $ 0.38  
                                                 
Effect of Dilutive Securities
    -       27,412               -       30,729          
                                                 
Diluted EPS per common share
  $ 8,018       16,855,027     $ 0.48     $ 6,326       16,772,969     $ 0.38  

For both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, there were 542,916 options that were antidilutive because the exercise price exceeded the average market price for the period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, there 464,848 and 609,252 options, respectively, that were antidilutive because the exercise price exceeded the average market price for the period. In addition, the warrant for 616,308 shares issued to the U.S. Treasury (see Note 15) was antidilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Antidilutive options and warrants have been omitted from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the respective periods.

 
Page 16


Note 7 – Securities

The book values and approximate fair values of investment securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

   
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Unrealized
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Unrealized
 
($ in thousands)
 
Cost
   
Value
   
Gains
   
(Losses)
   
Cost
   
Value
   
Gains
   
(Losses)
 
                                                 
Securities available for sale:
                                               
Government-sponsored
enterprise securities
  $ 32,149       32,380       251       (20 )     43,432       43,273       214       (373 )
Mortgage-backed securities
    109,809       113,134       3,936       (611 )     104,660       107,460       3,270       (470 )
Corporate bonds
    13,193       13,117       279       (355 )     15,754       15,330       35       (459 )
Equity securities
    12,903       13,213       343       (33 )     14,858       15,119       301       (40 )
Total available for sale
  $ 168,054       171,844       4,809       (1,019 )     178,704       181,182       3,820       (1,342 )
                                                                 
Securities held to maturity:
                                                               
State and local governments
  $ 57,593       59,860       2,336       (68 )     54,011       53,305       517       (1,223 )
Other
                            7       7              
Total held to maturity
  $ 57,593       59,860       2,336       (68 )     54,018       53,312       517       (1,223 )

Included in mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2011 were collateralized mortgage obligations with an amortized cost of $2,029,000 and a fair value of $2,100,000. Included in mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2010 were collateralized mortgage obligations with an amortized cost of $2,644,000 and a fair value of $2,740,000.

The Company owned Federal Home Loan Bank stock with a cost and fair value of $12,809,000 and $14,759,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is included in equity securities above and serves as part of the collateral for the Company’s line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank. The investment in this stock is a requirement for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank system.

The following table presents information regarding securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2011:

 
($ in thousands)
 
 
Securities in an Unrealized
Loss Position for
Less than 12 Months
   
Securities in an Unrealized
Loss Position for
More than 12 Months
   
Total
 
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
 
Government-sponsored enterprise
securities
  $ 5,978       20                   5,978       20  
Mortgage-backed securities
    36,343       611                   36,343       611  
Corporate bonds
    2,028       18       2,963       337       4,991       355  
Equity securities
    9       3       22       30       31       33  
State and local governments
    3,671       68                   3,671       68  
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 48,029       720       2,985       367       51,014       1,087  

 
Page 17


The following table presents information regarding securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2010:

   
Securities in an Unrealized
Loss Position for
Less than 12 Months
   
Securities in an Unrealized
Loss Position for
More than 12 Months
   
Total
 
(in thousands)
 
 
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
 
Government-sponsored enterprise
securities
  $ 18,607       373                   18,607       373  
Mortgage-backed securities
    21,741       470                   21,741       470  
Corporate bonds
    7,548       55       2,900       404       10,448       459  
Equity securities
    3       1       29       39       32       40  
State and local governments
    35,289       1,223                   35,289       1,223  
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 83,188       2,122       2,929       443       86,117       2,565  

In the above tables, all of the non-equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are bonds that the Company has determined are in a loss position due to interest rate factors, the overall economic downturn in the financial sector, and the broader economy in general. The Company has evaluated the collectability of each of these bonds and has concluded that there is no other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intend to sell these securities, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities before recovery of the amortized cost. The Company has also concluded that each of the equity securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was in such a position due to temporary fluctuations in the market prices of the securities. The Company’s policy is to record an impairment charge for any of these equity securities that remains in an unrealized loss position for twelve consecutive months unless the amount is insignificant.

The aggregate carrying amount of cost-method investments was $12,809,000 and $14,766,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which included the Federal Home Loan Bank stock discussed above. The Company determined that none of its cost-method investments were impaired at either period end.

The book values and approximate fair values of investment securities at June 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are summarized in the table below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

   
Securities Available for Sale
   
Securities Held to Maturity
 
   
Amortized
   
Fair
   
Amortized
   
Fair
 
($ in thousands)
 
Cost
   
Value
   
Cost
   
Value
 
                         
Debt securities
                       
Due within one year
  $             627       637  
Due after one year but within five years
    35,145       35,424       1,576       1,653  
Due after five years but within ten years
                21,418       22,563  
Due after ten years
    10,197       10,073       33,972       35,007  
Mortgage-backed securities
    109,809       113,134              
Total debt securities
    155,151       158,631       57,593       59,860  
                                 
Equity securities
    12,903       13,213              
Total securities
  $ 168,054       171,844       57,593       59,860  

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, investment securities with book values of $105,816,000 and $75,654,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public and private deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

There were $2,510,000 in sales of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2011, which resulted in a net gain of $8,000. There were no securities sales during the first six months of 2010. During the six months ended

 
Page 18


June 30, 2011, the Company recorded a net loss of $5,000 related to write-downs of the Company’s equity portfolio and recorded a net gain of $71,000 related to the call of several securities. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a gain of $24,000 related to the call of several municipal securities.

Note 8 – Loans and Asset Quality Information

The loans and foreclosed real estate that were acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions are covered by loss share agreements between the FDIC and First Bank, which afford First Bank significant loss protection. (See the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the Cooperative Bank transaction and Note 4 above for the more information regarding The Bank of Asheville transaction.) Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risk of the Cooperative Bank and The Bank of Asheville loans and foreclosed real estate are significantly different from those assets not covered under the loss share agreements. Accordingly, the Company presents separately loans subject to the loss share agreements as “covered loans” in the information below and loans that are not subject to the loss share agreements as “non-covered loans.”

The following is a summary of the major categories of total loans outstanding:

($ in thousands)
 
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
   
Amount
   
Percentage
   
Amount
   
Percentage
   
Amount
   
Percentage
 
All loans (non-covered and covered):
                                   
                                     
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 158,303       6 %     155,016       6 %     162,645       6 %
Real estate – construction, land
development & other land loans
    386,354       16 %     437,700       18 %     501,323       20 %
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4
family) first mortgages
    803,209       33 %     802,658       33 %     817,167       32 %
Real estate – mortgage – home equity
loans / lines of credit
    266,995       11 %     263,529       11 %     265,443       11 %
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and
other
    745,858       31 %     710,337       29 %     722,988       28 %
Installment loans to individuals
    80,423       3 %     83,919       3 %     84,319       3 %
Subtotal
    2,441,142       100 %     2,453,159       100 %     2,553,885       100 %
Unamortized net deferred loan costs
    1,298               973               691          
Total loans
  $ 2,442,440               2,454,132               2,554,576          

As of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, net loans include unamortized premiums of $1,182,000, $687,000, and $785,000, respectively, related to acquired loans.

 
Page 19


The following is a summary of the major categories of non-covered loans outstanding:

($ in thousands)
 
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
   
Amount
   
Percentage
   
Amount
   
Percentage
   
Amount
   
Percentage
 
Non-covered loans:
                                   
                                     
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 145,811       7 %     150,545       7 %     157,751       7 %
Real estate – construction, land
development & other land loans
    306,140       15 %     344,939       17 %     377,939       18 %
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4
family) first mortgages
    631,640       31 %     622,353       30 %     603,051       29 %
Real estate – mortgage – home equity
loans / lines of credit
    241,973       12 %     246,418       12 %     244,822       12 %
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and
other
    635,103       31 %     636,197       30 %     633,711       30 %
Installment loans to individuals
    78,749       4 %     81,579       4 %     81,134       4 %
Subtotal
    2,039,416       100 %     2,082,031       100 %     2,098,408       100 %
Unamortized net deferred loan costs
    1,298               973               691          
Total non-covered loans
  $ 2,040,714               2,083,004               2,099,099          

The carrying amount of the covered loans at June 30, 2011 consisted of impaired and nonimpaired purchased loans, as follows:

 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Impaired
Purchased
Loans –
Carrying
Value
   
Impaired
Purchased
Loans –
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   
Nonimpaired
Purchased
Loans –
Carrying
Value
   
Nonimpaired
Purchased
Loans -
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   
Total
Covered
Loans –
Carrying
Value
   
Total
Covered
Loans –
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Covered loans:
                                   
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 138       705       12,273       19,597       12,411       20,302  
Real estate – construction, land
development & other land loans
    5,611       19,574       74,627       122,557       80,238       142,131  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4
family) first mortgages
    1,383       2,962       172,352       205,147       173,735       208,109  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans
/ lines of credit
    276       962       22,272       29,175       22,548       30,137  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and
other
    6,129       11,418       104,910       139,207       111,039       150,625  
Installment loans to individuals
          8       1,755       1,937       1,755       1,945  
Total
  $ 13,537       35,629       388,189       517,620       401,726       553,249  

 
Page 20


The carrying amount of the covered loans at December 31, 2010 consisted of impaired and nonimpaired purchased loans, as follows:

 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Impaired
Purchased
Loans –
Carrying
Value
   
Impaired
Purchased
Loans –
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   
Nonimpaired
Purchased
Loans –
Carrying
Value
   
Nonimpaired
Purchased
Loans -
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   
Total
Covered
Loans –
Carrying
Value
   
Total
Covered
Loans –
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Covered loans:
                                   
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $             4,471       5,272       4,471       5,272  
Real estate – construction, land
development & other land loans
    1,898       3,328       90,863       147,615       92,761       150,943  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4
family) first mortgages
                180,305       212,826       180,305       212,826  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans
/ lines of credit
                17,111       20,332       17,111       20,332  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and
other
    2,709       3,594       71,431       93,490       74,140       97,084  
Installment loans to individuals
                2,340       2,595       2,340       2,595  
Total
  $ 4,607       6,922       366,521       482,130       371,128       489,052  

The following table presents information regarding covered purchased nonimpaired loans since December 31, 2009. The amounts include principal only and do not reflect accrued interest as of the date of the acquisition or beyond.

($ in thousands)
     
Carrying amount of nonimpaired covered loans at December 31, 2009
  $ 485,572  
Principal repayments
    (43,801 )
Transfers to foreclosed real estate
    (75,121 )
Loan charge-offs
    (7,736 )
Accretion of loan discount
    7,607  
Carrying amount of nonimpaired covered loans at December 31, 2010
    366,521  
Additions due to acquisition of The Bank of Asheville (at fair value)
    84,623  
Principal repayments
    (25,742 )
Transfers to foreclosed real estate
    (33,286 )
Loan charge-offs
    (10,456 )
Accretion of loan discount
    6,529  
Carrying amount of nonimpaired covered loans at June 30, 2011
  $ 388,189  

As reflected in the table above, the Company accreted $6,529,000 of the loan discount on purchased nonimpaired loans into interest income during the first six months of 2011.

The following table presents information regarding all purchased impaired loans since December 31, 2009, substantially all of which are covered loans. The Company has applied the cost recovery method to all purchased impaired loans at their respective acquisition dates due to the uncertainty as to the timing of expected cash flows, as reflected in the following table.

 
Page 21

 
($ in thousands)
 
 
 
Purchased Impaired Loans
 
Contractual
Principal
Receivable
   
Fair Market Value
Adjustment – Write
Down (Nonaccretable
Difference)
   
Carrying
Amount
 
Balance at December 31, 2009
  $ 39,293       3,242       36,051  
Change due to payments received
    (685 )     2       (687 )
Transfer to foreclosed real estate
    (27,569 )     (225 )     (27,344 )
Change due to loan charge-off
    (3,149 )     (625 )     (2,524 )
Other
    190       (65 )     255  
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 8,080       2,329       5,751  
Additions due to acquisition of The Bank of Asheville
    38,452       20,807       17,645  
Change due to payments received
    (691 )     (260 )     (431 )
Transfer to foreclosed real estate
    (7,401 )     (1,223 )     (6,178 )
Change due to loan charge-off
    (1,874 )     372       (2,246 )
Other
    670       440       230  
Balance at June 30, 2011
  $ 37,236       22,465       14,771  

Each of the purchased impaired loans is on nonaccrual status and considered to be impaired. Because of the uncertainty of the expected cash flows, the Company is accounting for each purchased impaired loan under the cost recovery method, in which all cash payments are applied to principal. Thus, there is no accretable yield associated with the above loans. During the first six months of 2010, the Company received $67,000 in payments that exceeded the initial carrying amount of the purchased impaired loans. These payments were recorded as interest income. There were no such amounts recorded in 2011.

Nonperforming assets are defined as nonaccrual loans, restructured loans, loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest, and other real estate. Nonperforming assets are summarized as follows:

 
ASSET QUALITY DATA ($ in thousands)
 
June 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
   
June 30,
2010
 
                   
Non-covered nonperforming assets
                 
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 71,570       62,326       73,152  
Restructured loans – accruing
    16,893       33,677       20,392  
Accruing loans > 90 days past due
    -       -       -  
Total non-covered nonperforming loans
    88,463       96,003       93,544  
Other real estate
    31,849       21,081       14,690  
Total non-covered nonperforming assets
  $ 120,312       117,084       108,234  
                         
Covered nonperforming assets
                       
Nonaccrual loans (1)
  $ 37,057       58,466       98,669  
Restructured loans – accruing
    24,325       14,359       8,450  
Accruing loans > 90 days past due
    -       -       -  
Total covered nonperforming loans
    61,382       72,825       107,119  
Other real estate
    102,883       94,891       80,074  
Total covered nonperforming assets
  $ 164,265       167,716       187,193  
                         
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 284,577       284,800       295,427  


(1) At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010, the contractual balance of the nonaccrual loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements was $69.4 million, $86.2 million, and $146.5 million, respectively.

 
Page 22


The following table presents information related to the Company’s impaired loans.

 
($ in thousands)
 
As of /for the
six months
ended
June 30,
2011
   
As of /for the
year ended
December 31,
2010
   
As of /for the
six months
ended
June 30,
2010
 
Impaired loans at period end
                 
Non-covered
  $ 88,463       96,003       93,544  
Covered
    61,382       72,825       107,119  
Total impaired loans at period end
  $ 149,845       168,828       200,663  
                         
Average amount of impaired loans for period
                       
Non-covered
  $ 91,187       89,751       79,913  
Covered
    69,102       95,373       106,096  
Average amount of impaired loans for period – total
  $ 160,289       185,124       186,009  
                         
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans at period end
                       
Non-covered
  $ 6,019       7,613       12,060  
Covered
    4,727       11,155        
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans - total
  $ 10,746       18,768       12,060  
                         
Amount of impaired loans with no related allowance at period end
                       
Non-covered
  $ 31,514       42,874       26,092  
Covered
    49,755       49,991       107,119  
Total impaired loans with no related allowance at period end
  $ 81,269       92,865       133,211  
                         
 
All of the impaired loans noted in the table above were on nonaccrual status at each respective period end except for those classified as restructured loans (see table above for balances).

The remaining tables in this note present information derived from the Company’s allowance for loan loss model. Relevant accounting guidance requires certain disclosures to be disaggregated based on how the Company develops its allowance for loan losses and manages its credit exposure. This model combines loan types in a different manner than the tables previously presented.

The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2011.

($ in thousands)
 
Non-covered
   
Covered
   
Total
 
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                 
Commercial – unsecured
  $ 301       178       479  
Commercial – secured
    2,015       107       2,122  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    113       43       156  
                         
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    29,541       15,055       44,596  
                         
Real estate – residential, farmland and multi-family
    22,642       12,296       34,938  
                         
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    2,548       1,013       3,561  
                         
Real estate – commercial
    11,666       8,355       20,021  
                         
Consumer
    2,744       10       2,754  
Total
  $ 71,570       37,057       108,627  

 
Page 23


The following table presents the Company’s nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
 
Non-covered
   
Covered
   
Total
 
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                 
Commercial – unsecured
  $ 64       160       224  
Commercial – secured
    1,566       3       1,569  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    802             802  
                         
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    22,654       30,847       53,501  
                         
Real estate – residential, farmland and multi-family
    27,055       19,716       46,771  
                         
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    2,201       685       2,886  
                         
Real estate – commercial
    7,461       7,039       14,500  
                         
Consumer
    523       16       539  
Total
  $ 62,326       58,466       120,792  

The following table presents an analysis of the payment status of the Company’s loans as of June 30, 2011.

($ in thousands)
 
 
 
30-59
Days
Past Due
   
60-89
Days
Past Due
   
Nonaccrual
Loans
   
Current
   
Total Loans
Receivable
 
Non-covered loans
                             
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                             
Commercial - unsecured
  $ 31       41       301       38,341       38,714  
Commercial - secured
    965       602       2,015       101,814       105,396  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
                113       20,868       20,981  
                                         
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    1,638       310       29,541       235,857       267,346  
                                         
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    7,127       3,396       22,642       741,283       774,448  
                                         
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    1,773       191       2,548       209,408       213,920  
                                         
Real estate - commercial
    1,935       867       11,666       544,411       558,879  
                                         
Consumer
    687       269       2,744       56,032       59,732  
Total non-covered
  $ 14,156       5,676       71,570       1,948,014       2,039,416  
Unamortized net deferred loan costs
                                    1,298  
Total non-covered loans
                                  $ 2,040,714  
                                         
Covered loans
  $ 5,287       5,303       37,057       354,079       401,726  
                                         
Total loans
  $ 19,443       10,979       108,627       2,302,093       2,442,440  

The Company had no non-covered or covered loans that were past due greater than 90 days and accruing interest at June 30, 2011.

 
Page 24


The following table presents an analysis of the payment status of the Company’s loans as of December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
 
 
 
30-59
Days
Past Due
   
60-89
Days
Past Due
   
Nonaccrual
Loans
   
Current
   
Total Loans
Receivable
 
Non-covered loans
                             
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                             
Commercial - unsecured
  $ 225       92       64       41,564       41,945  
Commercial - secured
    1,165       195       1,566       102,657       105,583  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    100             802       21,369       22,271  
                                         
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    2,951       7,022       22,654       270,892       303,519  
                                         
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    10,290       2,942       27,055       726,456       766,743  
                                         
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    496       253       2,201       213,984       216,934  
                                         
Real estate - commercial
    2,581       1,193       7,461       552,020       563,255  
                                         
Consumer
    595       297       523       60,366       61,781  
Total non-covered
  $ 18,403       11,994       62,326       1,989,308       2,082,031  
Unamortized net deferred loan costs
                                    973  
Total non-covered loans
                                  $ 2,083,004  
                                         
Total covered loans
  $ 6,713       4,127       58,466       301,822       371,128  
                                         
Total loans
  $ 25,116       16,121       120,792       2,291,130       2,454,132  

The Company had no non-covered or covered loans that were past due greater than 90 days and accruing interest at December 31, 2010.

 
Page 25


The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

($ in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial,
Financial,
And
Agricultural
   
Real Estate –
Construction,
Land
Development,
& Other Land
Loans
   
Real Estate
Residential,
Farmland,
and Multi-
family
   
Real
Estate –
Home
Equity
Lines of
Credit
   
Real Estate
Commercial
And Other
   
Consumer
   
Unallo
-cated
   
Total
 
                                                 
As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2011
                         
                                                 
Beginning balance
  $ 4,142       10,203       12,463       3,359       3,359       2,223       24       35,773  
Charge-offs
    (740 )     (5,589 )     (2,248 )     (141 )     (313 )     (157 )     (121 )     (9,309 )
Recoveries
    28       219       61       37             20       29       394  
Provisions
    475       6,957       1,808       (1,406 )     (187 )     (126 )     86       7,607  
Ending balance
  $ 3,905       11,790       12,084       1,849       2,859       1,960       18       34,465  
                                                                 
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011
                                         
                                                                 
Beginning balance
  $ 4,731       12,520       11,283       3,634       3,972       1,961       174       38,275  
Charge-offs
    (1,896 )     (9,582 )     (5,596 )     (764 )     (1,380 )     (360 )     (236 )     (19,814 )
Recoveries
    36       251       293       43       28       103       73       827  
Provisions
    1,034       8,601       6,104       (1,064 )     239       256       7       15,177  
Ending balance
  $ 3,905       11,790       12,084       1,849       2,859       1,960       18       34,465  
                                                                 
Ending balances as of June 30, 2011: Allowance for loan losses
                                         
                                                                 
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 50       1,221       235             340                   1,846  
                                                                 
Collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 3,855       10,569       11,849       1,849       2,519       1,960       18       32,619  
                                                                 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $                                            
                                                                 
Loans receivable as of June 30, 2011:
                                         
                                                                 
Ending balance–total
  $ 165,091       267,346       774,448       213,920       558,879       59,732             2,039,416  
                                                                 
Ending balances as of June 30, 2011: Loans
                                         
                                                                 
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 2,049       47,181       7,656       531       34,198       20             91,635  
                                                                 
Collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 163,042       220,165       766,792       213,389       524,681       59,712             1,947,781  
                                                                 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $       1,234                                     1,234  

 
Page 26


The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans for the year ended December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial,
Financial,
And
Agricultural
   
Real Estate –
Construction,
Land
Development,
& Other Land
Loans
   
Real Estate
Residential,
Farmland,
and Multi-
family
   
Real
Estate –
Home
Equity
Lines of
Credit
   
Real Estate
Commercial
and Other
   
Consumer
   
Unallo
-cated
   
Total
 
                                                 
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010
                               
                                                 
Beginning balance
  $ 4,992       9,286       10,779       3,228       6,839       1,610       609       37,343  
Charge-offs
    (4,691 )     (15,721 )     (6,962 )     (2,490 )     (2,354 )     (1,587 )           (33,805 )
Recoveries
    145       130       548       59       38       171             1,091  
Provisions
    4,285       18,825       6,918       2,837       (551 )     1,767       (435 )     33,646  
Ending balance
  $ 4,731       12,520       11,283       3,634       3,972       1,961       174       38,275  
                                                                 
Ending balances as of December 31, 2010: Allowance for loan losses
                                         
                                                                 
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 867       3,740       1,070       269       611                   6,557  
                                                                 
Collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 3,864       8,780       10,213       3,365       3,361       1,961       174       31,718  
                                                                 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $                                            
                                                                 
Loans receivable as of December 31, 2010:
                                                 
                                                                 
Ending balance – total
  $ 169,799       303,519       766,743       216,934       563,255       61,781             2,082,031  
                                                                 
Ending balances as of December 31, 2010: Loans
                                                 
                                                                 
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 3,487       64,549       15,786       1,223       25,213       28             110,286  
                                                                 
Collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 166,312       238,970       750,957       215,711       538,042       61,753             1,971,745  
                                                                 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
  $       1,144                                     1,144  

 
Page 27


The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for covered loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

($ in thousands)
 
Covered Loans
 
       
As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2011
     
       
Beginning balance
  $ 7,002  
Charge-offs
    (4,789 )
Recoveries
     
Provisions
    3,327  
Ending balance
  $ 5,540  
         
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011
       
         
Beginning balance
  $ 11,155  
Charge-offs
    (12,715 )
Recoveries
     
Provisions
    7,100  
Ending balance
  $ 5,540  
         
Ending balances as of June 30, 2011: Allowance for loan losses
       
         
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 5,540  
         
Collectively evaluated for impairment
     
         
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
     
         
Loans receivable as of June 30, 2011:
       
         
Ending balance – total
  $ 401,726  
         
Ending balances as of June 30, 2011: Loans
       
         
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 37,149  
         
Collectively evaluated for impairment
    364,577  
         
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
    13,538  

 
Page 28


The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for covered loans for the year ended December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
 
Covered Loans
 
       
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010
     
       
Beginning balance
  $  
Charge-offs
    (9,761 )
Recoveries
     
Provisions
    20,916  
Ending balance
  $ 11,155  
         
Ending balances as of December 31, 2010: Allowance for loan losses
       
         
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 11,155  
         
Collectively evaluated for impairment
     
         
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
     
         
Loans receivable as of December 31, 2010:
       
         
Ending balance – total
  $ 371,128  
         
Ending balances as of December 31, 2010: Loans
       
         
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 72,690  
         
Collectively evaluated for impairment
    298,438  
         
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
    4,607  

 
Page 29


The following table presents the Company’s impaired loans as of June 30, 2011.

 
($ in thousands)
 
Recorded
Investment
   
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   
Related
Allowance
   
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Non-covered loans:
                       
With no related allowance recorded:
                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                       
Commercial - unsecured
  $                    
Commercial - secured
    749       1,103             653  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    47       597             177  
                                 
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    15,245       19,680             20,079  
                                 
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    3,468       4,256             5,387  
                                 
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
          250             101  
                                 
Real estate – commercial
    11,990       12,808             11,771  
                                 
Consumer
    15       40             18  
Total non-covered impaired loans with no allowance
  $ 31,514       38,734             38,186  
                                 
Total covered impaired loans with no allowance
  $ 49,755       87,707             52,510  
                                 
Total impaired loans with no allowance recorded
  $ 81,269       126,441             90,696  
                                 
Non-covered loans:
                               
With an allowance recorded:
                               
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                               
Commercial - unsecured
  $ 301       301       55       197  
Commercial - secured
    1,266       1,269       228       1,097  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    66       468       50       369  
                                 
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    20,381       29,882       2,904       17,696  
                                 
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    21,303       22,458       1,820       22,209  
                                 
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    2,548       2,567       103       2,276  
                                 
Real estate – commercial
    8,356       8,792       356       7,059  
                                 
Consumer
    2,728       2,746       503       2,098  
Total non-covered impaired loans with allowance
  $ 56,949       68,483       6,019       53,001  
                                 
Total covered impaired loans with allowance
  $ 11,628       16,568       4,727       16,592  
                                 
Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded
  $ 68,577       85,051       10,746       69,593  

Interest income recorded on non-covered and covered impaired loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 is considered insignificant.

The related allowance listed above includes both reserves on loans specifically reviewed for impairment and general reserves on impaired loans that were not specifically reviewed for impairment.

 
Page 30


The following table presents the Company’s impaired loans as of December 31, 2010.

 
($ in thousands)
 
Recorded
Investment
   
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   
Related
Allowance
   
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Non-covered loans:
                       
With no related allowance recorded:
                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                       
Commercial - unsecured
  $                   138  
Commercial - secured
    902       967             758  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    240       650             186  
                                 
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    22,026       26,012             15,639  
                                 
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    8,269       9,447             7,437  
                                 
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    302       502             381  
                                 
Real estate – commercial
    11,115       11,321             7,284  
                                 
Consumer
    20       40             46  
Total non-covered impaired loans with no allowance
  $ 42,874       48,939             31,869  
                                 
Total covered impaired loans with no allowance
  $ 49,991       77,321             83,955  
                                 
Total impaired loans with no allowance recorded
  $ 92,865       126,260             115,824  
                                 
Non-covered loans:
                               
With an allowance recorded:
                               
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                               
Commercial - unsecured
  $ 124       124       24       243  
Commercial - secured
    579       579       88       1,385  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    1,026       1,026       609       613  
                                 
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    17,540       19,926       3,932       21,362  
                                 
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    23,012       23,012       1,820       22,166  
                                 
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    2,148       2,223       357       1,928  
                                 
Real estate – commercial
    8,013       8,088       497       9,275  
                                 
Consumer
    687       687       286       910  
Total non-covered impaired loans with allowance
  $ 53,129       55,665       7,613       57,882  
                                 
Total covered impaired loans with allowance
  $ 22,834       27,105       11,155       11,418  
                                 
Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded
  $ 75,963       82,770       18,768       69,300  

Interest income recorded on non-covered and covered impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 2010 is considered insignificant.

The related allowance listed above includes both reserves on loans specifically reviewed for impairment and general reserves on impaired loans that were not specifically reviewed for impairment.

 
Page 31


The Company tracks credit quality based on its internal risk ratings. Upon origination a loan is assigned an initial risk grade, which is generally based on several factors such as the borrower’s credit score, the loan-to-value ratio, the debt-to-income ratio, etc. Loans that are risk-graded as substandard during the origination process are declined. After loans are initially graded, they are monitored monthly for credit quality based on many factors, such as payment history, the borrower’s financial status, and changes in collateral value. Loans can be downgraded or upgraded depending on management’s evaluation of these factors. Internal risk-grading policies are consistent throughout each loan type.

 The following describes the Company’s internal risk grades in ascending order of likelihood of loss:

 
Numerical Risk Grade
Description
Pass:
 
 
1
Cash secured loans.
 
2
Non-cash secured loans that have no minor or major exceptions to the lending guidelines.
 
3
Non-cash secured loans that have no major exceptions to the lending guidelines.
Weak Pass:
 
 
4
Non-cash secured loans that have minor or major exceptions to the lending guidelines, but the exceptions are properly mitigated.
Watch or Standard:
 
 
9
Loans that meet the guidelines for a Risk Graded 5 loan, except the collateral coverage is sufficient to satisfy the debt with no risk of loss under reasonable circumstances. This category also includes all loans to insiders and any other loan that management elects to monitor on the watch list.
Special Mention:
 
 
5
Existing loans with major exceptions that cannot be mitigated.
Classified:
 
 
6
Loans that have a well-defined weakness that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt if deficiencies are not corrected.
 
7
Loans that have a well-defined weakness that make the collection or liquidation improbable.
 
8
Loans that are considered uncollectible and are in the process of being charged-off.

 
Page 32


The following table presents the Company’s recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators as of June 30, 2011.

($ in thousands)
 
Credit Quality Indicator (Grouped by Internally Assigned Grade)
 
   
Pass
(Grades
1, 2, & 3)
   
Weak
Pass
(Grade 4)
   
Watch or
Standard
Loans
(Grade 9)
   
Special
Mention
Loans
(Grade 5)
   
Classified
Loans
(Grades
6, 7, & 8)
   
Total
 
Non-covered loans:
                                   
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                                   
Commercial - unsecured
  $ 12,203       25,295             295       921       38,714  
Commercial - secured
    35,814       62,501       1,440       1,379       4,262       105,396  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    4,415       15,213       96       859       398       20,981  
                                                 
Real estate – construction, land development
& other land loans
    47,029       155,650       6,241       11,828       46,598       267,346  
                                                 
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    273,661       427,093       9,351       17,589       46,754       774,448  
                                                 
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    136,959       68,023       2,566       2,549       3,823       213,920  
                                                 
Real estate - commercial
    164,238       325,657       32,211       10,020       26,753       558,879  
                                                 
Consumer
    31,984       23,939       71       130       3,608       59,732  
Total
  $ 706,303       1,103,371       51,976       44,649       133,117       2,039,416  
Unamortized net deferred loan costs
                                            1,298  
Total non-covered loans
                                          $ 2,040,714  
                                                 
Total covered loans
  83,777       168,063             13,878       136,008       401,726  
                                                 
Total loans
  $ 790,080       1,271,434       51,976       58,527       269,125       2,442,440  

 
Page 33


The following table presents the Company’s recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
 
Credit Quality Indicator (Grouped by Internally Assigned Grade)
 
   
Pass
(Grades
1, 2, & 3)
   
Weak
Pass
(Grade 4)
   
Watch or
Standard
Loans
(Grade 9)
   
Special
Mention
Loans
(Grade 5)
   
Classified
Loans
(Grades
6, 7, & 8)
   
Total
 
Non-covered loans:
                                   
Commercial, financial, and agricultural:
                                   
Commercial - unsecured
  $ 14,850       25,992             332       771       41,945  
Commercial - secured
    40,995       55,918       2,100       2,774       3,796       105,583  
Secured by inventory and accounts receivable
    6,364       14,165             873       869       22,271  
                                                 
Real estate – construction, land development
& other land loans
    66,321       162,147       7,649       14,068       53,334       303,519  
                                                 
Real estate – residential, farmland, and multi-family
    302,667       376,187       15,941       22,436       49,512       766,743  
                                                 
Real estate – home equity lines of credit
    137,674       68,876       3,001       3,060       4,323       216,934  
                                                 
Real estate - commercial
    190,284       301,828       33,706       12,141       25,296       563,255  
                                                 
Consumer
    34,600       24,783       140       408       1,850       61,781  
Total
  $ 793,755       1,029,896       62,537       56,092       139,751       2,082,031  
Unamortized net deferred loan costs
                                            973  
Total non-covered loans
                                          $ 2,083,004  
                                                 
Total covered loans
  38,276       187,526             7,579       137,747       371,128  
                                                 
Total loans
  $ 832,031       1,217,422       62,537       63,671       277,498       2,454,132  

 
Page 34


Note 9 – Deferred Loan Costs

The amount of loans shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes net deferred loan costs of approximately $1,298,000, $973,000, and $691,000 at June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010, respectively.

Note 10 – FDIC Indemnification Asset

The FDIC indemnification asset is the estimated amount that the Company will receive from the FDIC under loss share agreements associated with two FDIC-assisted failed bank acquisitions. See page 40 of the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K for a detailed explanation of this asset.

The FDIC indemnification asset was comprised of the following components as of the dates shown:

($ in thousands)
 
 
June 30,
2011
   
December 31,
2010
   
June 30,
2010
 
Receivable related to claims submitted, not yet received
  $ 27,668       30,201       26,550  
Receivable related to future claims on loans
    100,953       86,966       88,741  
Receivable related to future claims on other real estate owned
    14,273       6,552       2,781  
FDIC indemnification asset
  $ 142,894       123,719       118,072  

The following presents a rollforward of the FDIC indemnification asset since December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
     
       
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 123,719  
Increase related to Bank of Asheville acquisition
    42,218  
Increase related to unfavorable change in loss estimates
    11,694  
Increase related to reimbursable expenses
    2,746  
Cash received
    (32,468 )
Accretion of loan discount
    (5,223 )
Other
    208  
Balance at June 30, 2011
  $ 142,894  

 
Page 35


Note 11 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of amortizable intangible assets as of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 and the carrying amount of unamortized intangible assets as of those same dates. In 2011, the Company recorded a core deposit premium intangible of $277,000 in connection with the acquisition of The Bank of Asheville, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the related deposits of seven years.

   
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
   
Accumulated
Amortization
   
Gross Carrying
Amount
   
Accumulated
Amortization
   
Gross Carrying
Amount
   
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Amortizable intangible
assets:
                                   
Customer lists
  $ 678       328       678       298       678       266  
Core deposit premiums
    7,867       3,868       7,590       3,447       7,590       3,040  
Total
  $ 8,545       4,196       8,268       3,745       8,268       3,306  
                                                 
Unamortizable intangible
assets:
                                               
Goodwill
  $ 65,835               65,835               65,835          

Amortization expense totaled $226,000 and $220,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense totaled $450,000 and $435,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The following table presents the estimated amortization expense for the last two quarters of calendar year 2011 and for each of the four calendar years ending December 31, 2015 and the estimated amount amortizable thereafter. These estimates are subject to change in future periods to the extent management determines it is necessary to make adjustments to the carrying value or estimated useful lives of amortized intangible assets.

 
($ in thousands)
 
Estimated Amortization
Expense
 
July 1 to December 31, 2011
  $ 452  
2012
    892  
2013
    781  
2014
    678  
2015
    622  
Thereafter
    924  
Total
  $ 4,349  

 
Page 36


Note 12 – Pension Plans

The Company sponsors two defined benefit pension plans – a qualified retirement plan (the “Pension Plan”) which is generally available to all employees hired prior to June 19, 2009, and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), which is for the benefit of certain senior management executives of the Company.

The Company recorded pension expense totaling $832,000 and $783,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to the Pension Plan and the SERP. The following table contains the components of the pension expense.

   
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011 Total
   
2010 Total
 
($ in thousands)
 
Pension Plan
   
Pension Plan
   
SERP
   
SERP
   
Both Plans
   
Both Plans
 
Service cost – benefits earned during the period
  $ 478       424       115       118       593       542  
Interest cost
    432       378       102       92       534       470  
Expected return on plan assets
    (444 )     (355 )  
   
      (444 )     (355 )
Amortization of transition obligation
    1       1    
   
      1       1  
Amortization of net (gain)/loss
    114       99       26       18       140       117  
Amortization of prior service cost
    3       3       5       5       8       8  
Net periodic pension cost
  $ 584       550       248       233       832       783  

The Company recorded pension expense totaling $1,664,000 and $1,566,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to the Pension Plan and the SERP. The following table contains the components of the pension expense.

   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011 Total
   
2010 Total
 
($ in thousands)
 
Pension Plan
   
Pension Plan
   
SERP
   
SERP
   
Both Plans
   
Both Plans
 
Service cost – benefits earned during the period
  $ 956       848       230       236       1,186       1,084  
Interest cost
    864       756       204       184       1,068       940  
Expected return on plan assets
    (888 )     (710 )  
   
      (888 )     (710 )
Amortization of transition obligation
    2       2    
   
      2       2  
Amortization of net (gain)/loss
    228       198       52       36       280       234  
Amortization of prior service cost
    6       6       10       10       16       16  
Net periodic pension cost
  $ 1,168       1,100       496       466       1,664       1,566  

The Company’s contributions to the Pension Plan are based on computations by independent actuarial consultants and are intended to provide the Company with the maximum deduction for income tax purposes. The contributions are invested to provide for benefits under the Pension Plan. The Company plans to contribute $1,500,000 to the Pension Plan in 2011.

The Company’s funding policy with respect to the SERP is to fund the related benefits from the operating cash flow of the Company.

 
Page 37


Note 13 – Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period for non-owner transactions and is divided into net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes revenues, expenses, gains, and losses that are excluded from earnings under current accounting standards. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the Company are as follows:

   
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available for sale
  $ 3,790       2,478       3,895  
Deferred tax asset (liability)
    (1,478 )     (966 )     (1,520 )
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available for sale
    2,312       1,512       2,375  
                         
Additional pension liability
    (10,608 )     (10,905 )     (8,913 )
Deferred tax asset
    4,190       4,308       3,520  
Net additional pension liability
    (6,418 )     (6,597 )     (5,393 )
                         
Total accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (4,106 )     (5,085 )     (3,018 )

Note 14 – Fair Value

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

   
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Carrying
Amount
   
Estimated
Fair Value
   
Carrying
Amount
   
Estimated
Fair Value
 
                         
Cash and due from banks, noninterest-bearing
  $ 73,676       73,676       56,821       56,821  
Due from banks, interest-bearing
    163,414       163,414       154,320       154,320  
Federal funds sold
    1,157       1,157       861       861  
Securities available for sale
    171,844       171,844       181,182       181,182  
Securities held to maturity
    57,593       59,860       54,018       53,312  
Presold mortgages in process of settlement
    2,466       2,466       3,962       3,962  
Loans – non-covered, net of allowance
    2,006,249       1,960,991       2,044,729       2,020,109  
Loans – covered, net of allowance
    396,186       396,186       359,973       359,973  
FDIC indemnification asset
    142,894       141,982       123,719       122,351  
Accrued interest receivable
    12,000       12,000       13,579       13,579  
                                 
Deposits
    2,747,418       2,752,984       2,652,513       2,657,214  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    68,608       68,608       54,460       54,460  
Borrowings
    138,796       108,671       196,870       168,508  
Accrued interest payable
    2,208       2,208       2,082       2,082  

Fair value methods and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments.

Cash and Due from Banks, Federal Funds Sold, Presold Mortgages in Process of Settlement, Accrued Interest Receivable, and Accrued Interest Payable - The carrying amounts approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.

Available for Sale and Held to Maturity Securities - Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

 
Page 38


Loans – Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, financial and agricultural, real estate construction, real estate mortgages and installment loans to individuals. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and variable interest rate terms. The fair value for each category is determined by discounting scheduled future cash flows using current interest rates offered on loans with similar risk characteristics. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated based on discounted cash flows or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

FDIC Indemnification Asset – Fair value is equal to the FDIC reimbursement rate of the expected losses to be incurred and reimbursed by the FDIC and then discounted over the estimated period of receipt.

Deposits and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase - The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the valuation date. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Borrowings - The fair value of borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered by the Company’s lenders for debt of similar remaining maturities.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no highly liquid market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include net premises and equipment, intangible and other assets such as foreclosed properties, deferred income taxes, prepaid expense accounts, income taxes currently payable and other various accrued expenses. In addition, the income tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.

Relevant accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) of identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active or non-active markets and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2011.

 
Page 39


($ in thousands)
           
Description of Financial Instruments
 
Fair Value
at June 30,
2011
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
   
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Recurring
                       
Securities available for sale:
                       
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
  $ 32,380       ––       32,380        
Mortgage-backed securities
    113,134       ––       113,134       ––  
Corporate bonds
    13,117       ––       13,117       ––  
Equity securities
    13,213       404       12,809       ––  
Total available for sale securities
  $ 171,844       404       171,440       ––  
                                 
Nonrecurring
                               
Impaired loans – covered
  $ 61,382             61,382        
Impaired loans – non-covered
    88,463       ––       88,463       ––  
Other real estate – covered
    102,883             102,883        
Other real estate – non-covered
    31,849       ––       31,849       ––  

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2010.

($ in thousands)
           
Description of Financial
Instruments
 
Fair Value at
December
31, 2010
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
   
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Recurring
                       
Securities available for sale:
                       
Government-sponsored enterprise securities
  $ 43,273             43,273        
Mortgage-backed securities
    107,460             107,460        
Corporate bonds
    15,330             15,330        
Equity securities
    15,119       360       14,759        
Total available for sale
securities
  $ 181,182       360       180,822        
                                 
Nonrecurring
                               
Impaired loans – covered
  $ 72,825             72,825        
Impaired loans – non-covered
    96,003             96,003        
Other real estate – covered
    94,891             94,891        
Other real estate – non-covered
    21,081             21,081        

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value.

Securities When quoted market prices are available in an active market, the securities are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities for the Company include certain equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available, but fair values can be estimated by observing quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, the securities are classified as Level 2 on the valuation hierarchy. For the Company, Level 2 securities include mortgage backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, government sponsored enterprise securities, and corporate bonds. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 
Page 40


Impaired loans Fair values for impaired loans in the above table are collateral dependent and are estimated based on underlying collateral values, which are then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of the collateral.

Other real estate – Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses.

There were no transfers to or from Level 1 and 2 during the three or six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the increase in the fair value of securities available for sale was $1,313,000 which is included in other comprehensive income (net of tax expense of $512,000). Fair value measurement methods at June 30, 2011 are consistent with those used in prior reporting periods.

Note 15 – Participation in the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program

On January 9, 2009, the Company completed the sale of $65 million of Series A preferred stock to the United States Treasury Department (Treasury) under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. The program was designed to attract broad participation by healthy banking institutions to help stabilize the financial system and increase lending for the benefit of the U.S. economy.

Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, the Treasury received (i) 65,000 shares of fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock with a liquidation value of $1,000 per share and (ii) a warrant to purchase 616,308 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value, in exchange for $65 million.

The preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% for the first five years, and 9% thereafter. Subject to regulatory approval, the Company is generally permitted to redeem the preferred shares at par plus unpaid dividends.

The warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price equal to $15.82 per share. The Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the warrant.

The Company allocated the $65 million in proceeds to the preferred stock and the common stock warrant based on their relative fair values. To determine the fair value of the preferred stock, the Company used a discounted cash flow model that assumed redemption of the preferred stock at the end of year five. The discount rate utilized was 13% and the estimated fair value was determined to be $36.2 million. The fair value of the common stock warrant was estimated to be $2.8 million using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
 
Expected dividend yield
    4.83 %
Risk-free interest rate
    2.48 %
Expected life
 
10 years
 
Expected volatility
    35.00 %
Weighted average fair value
  $ 4.47  

The aggregate fair value result for both the preferred stock and the common stock warrant was determined to be $39.0 million, with 7% of this aggregate total attributable to the warrant and 93% attributable to the preferred stock. Therefore, the $65 million issuance was allocated with $60.4 million being assigned to the preferred stock and $4.6 million being assigned to the common stock warrant.

 
Page 41


The $4.6 million difference between the $65 million face value of the preferred stock and the $60.4 million allocated to it upon issuance was recorded as a discount on the preferred stock. The $4.6 million discount is being accreted, using the effective interest method, as a reduction in net income available to common shareholders over a five-year period at approximately $0.8 million to $1.0 million per year.

For the first six months of 2011 and 2010, the Company accrued approximately $1,625,000 and $1,625,000, respectively, in preferred dividend payments and accreted $458,000 and $428,000, respectively, of the discount on the preferred stock. These amounts are deducted from net income in computing “Net income available to common shareholders.”

 
Page 42


Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with general practices followed by the banking industry. Certain of these principles involve a significant amount of judgment and may involve the use of estimates based on our best assumptions at the time of the estimation. The allowance for loan losses, intangible assets, and the valuation of acquired assets are three policies we have identified as being more sensitive in terms of judgments and estimates, taking into account their overall potential impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Due to the estimation process and the potential materiality of the amounts involved, we have identified the accounting for the allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses as an accounting policy critical to our consolidated financial statements. The provision for loan losses charged to operations is an amount sufficient to bring the allowance for loan losses to an estimated balance considered adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio.

Our determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based primarily on a mathematical model that estimates the appropriate allowance for loan losses. This model has two components. The first component involves the estimation of losses on non-single family home loans greater than $250,000 that are defined as “impaired loans.” A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The estimated valuation allowance is the difference, if any, between the loan balance outstanding and the value of the impaired loan as determined by either 1) an estimate of the cash flows that we expect to receive from the borrower discounted at the loan’s effective rate, or 2) in the case of a collateral-dependent loan, the fair value of the collateral.

The second component of the allowance model is an estimate of losses for impaired single family home loans, impaired loans less than $250,000, and all loans not considered to be impaired loans. Impaired single family home loans, impaired loans less than $250,000, and loans that we have classified as having normal credit risk are segregated by loan type, and estimated loss percentages are assigned to each loan type, based on the historical losses, current economic conditions, and operational conditions specific to each loan type. Loans that we have risk graded as having more than “standard” risk but not considered to be impaired are segregated between those relationships with outstanding balances exceeding $500,000 and those that are less than that amount. For those loan relationships with outstanding balances exceeding $500,000, we review the attributes of each individual loan and assign any necessary loss reserve based on various factors including payment history, borrower strength, collateral value, and guarantor strength. For loan relationships less than $500,000 with more than standard risk but not considered to be impaired, loss percentages are based on a multiple of the estimated loss rate for loans of a similar loan type with normal risk. The multiples assigned vary by type of loan, depending on risk, and we have consulted with an external credit review firm in assigning those multiples.

The reserve estimated for impaired loans is then added to the reserve estimated for all other loans. This becomes our “allocated allowance.” In addition to the allocated allowance derived from the model, we also evaluate other data such as the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans, net loan growth information, nonperforming asset levels and trends in such data. Based on this additional analysis, we may determine that an additional amount of allowance for loan losses is necessary to reserve for probable losses. This additional amount, if any, is our “unallocated allowance.” The sum of the allocated allowance and the unallocated allowance is compared to the actual allowance for loan losses recorded on our books and any adjustment necessary for the recorded allowance to equal the computed allowance is recorded as a provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is a direct charge to earnings in the period recorded.

 
Page 43


Loans covered under loss share agreements are recorded at fair value at acquisition date. Therefore, amounts deemed uncollectible at acquisition date become a part of the fair value calculation and are excluded from the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent decreases in the amount expected to be collected result in a provision for loan losses with a corresponding increase in the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent increases in the amount expected to be collected are accreted into income over the life of the loan. Proportional adjustments are also recorded to the FDIC indemnification asset.

Although we use the best information available to make evaluations, future material adjustments may be necessary if economic, operational, or other conditions change. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based on the examiners’ judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

For further discussion, see “Nonperforming Assets” and “Summary of Loan Loss Experience” below.

Intangible Assets

Due to the estimation process and the potential materiality of the amounts involved, we have also identified the accounting for intangible assets as an accounting policy critical to our consolidated financial statements.

When we complete an acquisition transaction, the excess of the purchase price over the amount by which the fair market value of assets acquired exceeds the fair market value of liabilities assumed represents an intangible asset. We must then determine the identifiable portions of the intangible asset, with any remaining amount classified as goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets associated with these acquisitions are generally amortized over the estimated life of the related asset, whereas goodwill is tested annually for impairment, but not systematically amortized. Assuming no goodwill impairment, it is beneficial to our future earnings to have a lower amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets and higher amount of goodwill as opposed to having a higher amount considered to be identifiable intangible assets and a lower amount classified as goodwill.

The primary identifiable intangible asset we typically record in connection with a whole bank or bank branch acquisition is the value of the core deposit intangible, whereas when we acquire an insurance agency, the primary identifiable intangible asset is the value of the acquired customer list. Determining the amount of identifiable intangible assets and their average lives involves multiple assumptions and estimates and is typically determined by performing a discounted cash flow analysis, which involves a combination of any or all of the following assumptions: customer attrition/runoff, alternative funding costs, deposit servicing costs, and discount rates. We typically engage a third party consultant to assist in each analysis. For the whole bank and bank branch transactions recorded to date, the core deposit intangibles have generally been estimated to have a life ranging from seven to ten years, with an accelerated rate of amortization. For insurance agency acquisitions, the identifiable intangible assets related to the customer lists were determined to have a life of ten to fifteen years, with amortization occurring on a straight-line basis.

Subsequent to the initial recording of the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, we amortize the identifiable intangible assets over their estimated average lives, as discussed above. In addition, on at least an annual basis, goodwill is evaluated for impairment by comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their related carrying value, including goodwill (our community banking operation is our only material reporting unit). If the carrying value of a reporting unit were ever to exceed its fair value, we would determine whether the implied fair value of the goodwill, using a discounted cash flow analysis, exceeded the carrying value of the goodwill. If the carrying value of the goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss would be recorded in an amount equal to that excess. Performing such a discounted cash flow analysis would involve the significant use of estimates and assumptions.

At our last goodwill impairment evaluation as of October 31, 2010, we determined the fair value of our community banking operation was approximately $18.25 per common share, or 6% higher, than the $17.28 stated

 
Page 44


book value of our common stock at the date of valuation. To assist us in computing the fair value of our community banking operation, we engaged a consulting firm who used eight valuation techniques as part of their analysis, which resulted in the conclusion of the $18.25 value.

We review identifiable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our policy is that an impairment loss is recognized, equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and its fair value, if the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Estimating future cash flows involves the use of multiple estimates and assumptions, such as those listed above.

Fair Value and Discount Accretion of Loans Acquired in FDIC-Assisted Transactions

We consider that the determination of the initial fair value of loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions, the initial fair value of the related FDIC indemnification asset, and the subsequent discount accretion of the purchased loans to involve a high degree of judgment and complexity. We determine fair value accounting estimates of newly assumed assets and liabilities in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. However, the amount that we realize on these assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in our financial statements, based upon the timing of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. To the extent the actual values realized for the acquired loans are different from the estimates, the FDIC indemnification asset will generally be impacted in an offsetting manner due to the loss-sharing support from the FDIC.

Because of the inherent credit losses associated with the acquired loans in a failed bank acquisition, the amount that we record as the fair values for the loans is generally less than the contractual unpaid principal balance due from the borrowers, with the difference being referred to as the “discount” on the acquired loans. We have applied the cost recovery method of accounting to all purchased impaired loans due to the uncertainty as to the timing of expected cash flows. This will result in the recognition of interest income on these impaired loans only when the cash payments received from the borrower exceed the recorded net book value of the related loans.

For nonimpaired purchased loans, we accrete the discount over the lives of the loans in a manner consistent with the guidance for accounting for loan origination fees and costs.

Current Accounting Matters

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements above for information about accounting standards that we have recently adopted.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $2.7 million, or $0.16 per diluted common share, compared to $2.9 million, or $0.17 per diluted common share, recorded in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 net income available to common shareholders amounted to $8.0 million, or $0.48 per diluted common share, compared to $6.3 million, or $0.38 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

In the first quarter of 2011, we realized a $10.2 million bargain purchase gain related to the acquisition of The Bank of Asheville (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements). This gain resulted from the difference between the purchase price and the acquisition-date fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities. The after-tax impact of this gain was $6.2 million, or $0.37 per diluted common share.

 
Page 45


Note Regarding Components of Earnings

In addition to the gain related to The Bank of Asheville acquisition, our results of operation are significantly affected by the on-going accounting for the two FDIC-assisted failed bank acquisitions that we have completed. In the discussion below, the term “covered” is used to describe assets included as part of FDIC loss share agreements, which generally result in the FDIC reimbursing the Company for 80% of losses incurred on those assets.

For covered loans that deteriorate in terms of repayment expectations, we record immediate allowances through the provision for loan losses. For covered loans that experience favorable changes in credit quality compared to what was expected at the acquisition date, including loans that are paid off, we record positive adjustments to interest income over the life of the respective loan – also referred to as discount accretion. For foreclosed properties that are sold at gains or losses or that are written down to lower values, we record the gains/losses within noninterest income.

The adjustments discussed above are recorded within the income statement line items noted without consideration of the FDIC loss share agreements. Because favorable changes in covered assets result in lower expected FDIC claims, and unfavorable changes in covered assets result in higher expected FDIC claims, the FDIC indemnification asset is adjusted to reflect those expectations. The net increase or decrease in the indemnification asset is reflected within noninterest income.

The adjustments noted above can result in volatility within individual income statement line items. Because of the FDIC loss share agreements and the associated indemnification asset, pretax income resulting from amounts recorded as provisions for loan losses, discount accretion, and losses from covered foreclosed properties is generally only impacted by 20% due to the corresponding adjustments made to the indemnification asset.

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin

Net interest income for the second quarter of 2011 amounted to $34.5 million, a 9.3% increase from the $31.5 million recorded in the second quarter of 2010. Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $66.8 million, a 6.5% increase from the $62.7 million recorded in the comparable period of 2010. The increases in net interest income have been due to higher net interest margins realized, which were partially offset by lower levels of average earning assets.

Our net interest margin (tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earnings assets) in the second quarter of 2011 was 4.92%, a 57 basis point increase compared to the 4.35% margin realized in the second quarter of 2010. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, our net interest margin was 4.77% compared to 4.25% for the same period in 2010. The higher margins are primarily related to larger amounts of discount accretion on loans purchased in failed bank acquisitions, as well as lower overall funding costs. Our cost of funds has steadily declined from 1.11% in the second quarter of 2010 to 0.82% in the second quarter of 2011.

Provision for Loan Losses and Asset Quality

Our provisions for loan losses remain at elevated levels, primarily due to high unemployment rates and declining property values in our market area that negatively impact collateral dependent real estate loans. Our provision for loan losses for non-covered loans amounted to $7.6 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 the provision for loan losses for non-covered loans was $15.2 million compared to $15.6 million for the comparable period of 2010.

Our provisions for loan losses for covered loans amounted to $3.3 million and $7.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, whereas we did not record any provisions for loan losses in the first six months of

 
Page 46


2010. As previously discussed, the provision for loan losses related to covered loans is offset by an 80% increase to the FDIC indemnification asset, which increases noninterest income.

Nonperforming asset levels have remained fairly stable over each of the past three quarter ends. Non-covered nonperforming assets were $116-$120 million over that period, or approximately 4.3% of total non-covered assets. Covered nonperforming assets have amounted to $164-$169 million over that same period, with the balances at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011 being impacted by the nonperforming assets assumed in The Bank of Asheville acquisition. Our outlook for nonperforming assets is consistent with the recent trend, with the Company not expecting material improvement, nor deterioration, in the near future.

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income was $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $4.5 million for the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded noninterest income of $19.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively. The significant increase in noninterest income for the six month period comparison is primarily attributable to the aforementioned bargain purchase gain recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

Noninterest Expenses

Noninterest expenses amounted to $22.9 million in the second quarter of 2011, a 4.4% increase over the $22.0 million recorded in the same period of 2010. Noninterest expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $48.0 million, an 8.4% increase from the $44.2 million recorded in the first six months of 2010. The increases are primarily due to growth of our branch network and additional infrastructure neccessary to manage growth and to address increasing compliance obligations and collection activities.

Balance Sheet and Capital

Total assets at June 30, 2011 amounted to $3.3 billion, a 0.5% increase from a year earlier. Total loans at June 30, 2011 amounted to $2.4 billion, a 4.4% decrease from a year earlier, and total deposits amounted to $2.7 billion at June 30, 2011, a 1.7% decrease from a year earlier.

Excluding acquisition growth, we continue to experience general declines in loans and deposits, which began with the onset of the recession. Although we originate and renew a significant amount of loans each month, normal paydowns of loans and loan foreclosures have been exceeding new loan growth. Overall, loan demand remains weak in most of our market areas. The declining loan balances have provided us with the liquidity to lessen our reliance on high cost deposits, which has improved funding costs.

The Company remains well-capitalized by all regulatory standards with a Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 17.00% compared to the 10.00% minimum to be considered well-capitalized. The Company’s tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was 6.65% at June 30, 2011, an increase of 9 basis points from a year earlier.

The Company continues to maintain $65 million in preferred stock that was issued to the US Treasury in January 2009 under the Capital Purchase Program (TARP). The Company has applied to participate in the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF), which would result in the repayment of its TARP funding by the simultaneous issuance of a similar amount of preferred stock under the terms of the SBLF. Participation in the SBLF could result in the dividend rate on the preferred stock being reduced from the current 5% to as low as 1%, depending on our success in meeting certain loan growth targets. Based on current loan levels, we would continue to pay dividends at the 5% rate. If approved, the switch to the SBLF is expected to occur in the third quarter of 2011.

Our annualized return on average assets for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was 0.32% and 0.48%, respectively, compared to 0.35% and 0.38% for the comparable periods of 2010. This ratio was calculated by dividing annualized net income available to common shareholders by average assets.

 
Page 47


Our annualized return on average common equity for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was 3.74% and 5.63%, respectively, compared to 4.11% and 4.51% for comparable periods of 2010. This ratio was calculated by dividing annualized net income available to common shareholders by average common equity.

Components of Earnings

Net interest income is the largest component of earnings, representing the difference between interest and fees generated from earning assets and the interest costs of deposits and other funds needed to support those assets. Net interest income for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $34,480,000, an increase of $2,944,000, or 9.3% from the $31,536,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2010. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $34,868,000, an increase of $3,001,000, or 9.4% from the $31,867,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2010. We believe that analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis is useful and appropriate because it allows a comparison of net interest income amounts in different periods without taking into account the different mix of taxable versus non-taxable investments that may have existed during those periods.

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
($ in thousands)
 
2011
   
2010
 
Net interest income, as reported
  $ 34,480       31,536  
Tax-equivalent adjustment
    388       331  
Net interest income, tax-equivalent
  $ 34,868       31,867  

Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $66,794,000, an increase of $4,081,000, or 6.5%, from the $62,713,000 recorded in the first six months of 2010. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis for the six months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $67,567,000, an increase of $4,228,000, or 6.7%, from the $63,339,000 recorded in the first six months of 2010.

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
($ in thousands)
 
2011
   
2010
 
Net interest income, as reported
  $ 66,794       62,713  
Tax-equivalent adjustment
    773       626  
Net interest income, tax-equivalent
  $ 67,567       63,339  

There are two primary factors that cause changes in the amount of net interest income we record - 1) growth in loans and deposits, and 2) our net interest margin (tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets).

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the increase in net interest income over the comparable periods in 2010 was due to a higher net interest margin, which was partially offset by a lower level of earning assets due to a contraction of the balance sheet over the past twelve months.

Our net interest margin in the second quarter of 2011 was 4.92%, a 30 basis point increase from the 4.62% realized in the first quarter of 2011 and a 57 basis point increase from the 4.35% realized in the second quarter of 2010. There have been no changes in the interest rates set by the Federal Reserve since December 2008, and we have been able to lower rates on maturing time deposits that were originated in periods of higher rates. Also, to a lesser degree, we have been able to progressively lower interest rates on various types of savings, NOW and money market accounts. We have also experienced declines in our levels of higher cost deposit accounts, including internet deposits and large denomination time deposits.

Our net interest margin also benefitted from the net accretion of purchase accounting premiums/discounts associated with the Cooperative Bank acquisition in June 2009 and, to a lesser degree, the acquisition of Great Pee Dee Bancorp in April 2008 and the Bank of Asheville in January 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and

 
Page 48


2010, we recorded $6,565,000 and $5,192,000, respectively, in net accretion of purchase accounting premiums/discounts that increased net interest income. The table below presents the components of the purchase accounting premiums/discounts.

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
$ in thousands
 
 
June 30,
2011
   
June 30,
2010
   
June 30,
2011
   
June 30,
2010
 
                         
Interest income – reduced by premium amortization on loans
  $ (116 )     (49 )     (221 )     (98 )
Interest income – increased by accretion of loan discount (1)
    4,014       1,659       6,529       3,143  
Interest expense – reduced by premium amortization of deposits
    130       731       183       1,915  
Interest expense – reduced by premium amortization of borrowings
    37       116       74       232  
                                 
Impact on net interest income
  $ 4,065       2,457       6,565       5,192  

(1)
Indemnification asset income is reduced by 80% of the amount of the accretion of loan discount, and therefore the net effect is that pretax income is positively impacted by 20% of the amounts in this line item. All other amounts in this table directly impact pretax income.

 
Page 49


The following tables present net interest income analysis on a tax-equivalent basis.

   
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Average
Volume
   
Average
Rate
   
Interest
Earned
or Paid
   
Average
Volume
   
Average
Rate
   
Interest
Earned
or Paid
 
Assets
                                   
Loans (1)
  $ 2,471,915       6.24 %   $ 38,464     $ 2,575,926       5.86 %   $ 37,609  
Taxable securities
    184,125       3.19 %     1,463       166,295       3.81 %     1,579  
Non-taxable securities (2)
    57,720       6.16 %     887       46,002       6.45 %     740  
Short-term investments, principally federal funds
    129,057       0.32 %     103       151,255       0.32 %     121  
Total interest-earning assets
    2,842,817       5.77 %     40,917       2,939,478       5.46 %     40,049  
                                                 
Cash and due from banks
    74,610                       60,480                  
Premises and equipment
    68,336                       54,157                  
Other assets
    341,475                       262,856                  
Total assets
  $ 3,327,238                     $ 3,316,971                  
                                                 
Liabilities
                                               
NOW accounts
  $ 350,094       0.21 %   $ 184     $ 341,914       0.28 %   $ 240  
Money market accounts
    507,381       0.57 %     723       508,044       0.87 %     1,098  
Savings accounts
    154,624       0.51 %     196       158,007       0.83 %     326  
Time deposits >$100,000
    778,235       1.37 %     2,661       800,430       1.59 %     3,182  
Other time deposits
    660,551       1.07 %     1,767       722,882       1.57 %     2,825  
Total interest-bearing deposits
    2,450,885       0.91 %     5,531       2,531,277       1.22 %     7,671  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    56,756       0.34 %     48       56,635       0.50 %     70  
Borrowings
    109,481       1.72 %     470       76,487       2.31 %     441  
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    2,617,122       0.93 %     6,049       2,664,399       1.23 %     8,182  
                                                 
Non-interest-bearing deposits
    335,113                       287,304                  
Other liabilities
    22,384                       15,938                  
Shareholders’ equity
    352,619                       349,330                  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 3,327,238                     $ 3,316,971                  
                                                 
Net yield on interest-earning
assets and net interest income
            4.92 %   $ 34,868               4.35 %   $ 31,867  
Interest rate spread
            4.84 %                     4.23 %        
                                                 
Average prime rate
            3.25 %                     3.25 %        

(1)
Average loans include nonaccruing loans, the effect of which is to lower the average rate shown.

(2)
Includes tax-equivalent adjustments of $388,000 and $331,000 in 2011 and 2010, respectively, to reflect the tax benefit that we receive related to tax-exempt securities, which carry interest rates lower than similar taxable investments due to their tax-exempt status. This amount has been computed assuming a 39% tax rate and is reduced by the related nondeductible portion of interest expense.

 
Page 50


   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
 
 
($ in thousands)
 
Average
Volume
   
Average
Rate
   
Interest
Earned
or Paid
   
Average
Volume
   
Average
Rate
   
Interest
Earned
or Paid
 
Assets
                                   
Loans (1)
  $ 2,486,963       6.10 %   $ 75,271     $ 2,601,782       5.88 %   $ 75,827  
Taxable securities
    184,914       3.16 %     2,895       170,345       3.68 %     3,109  
Non-taxable securities (2)
    57,265       6.24 %     1,772       42,679       6.56 %     1,389  
Short-term investments, principally federal funds
    128,287       0.30 %     193       187,500       0.35 %     328  
Total interest-earning assets
    2,857,429       5.66 %     80,131       3,002,306       5.42 %     80,653  
                                                 
Cash and due from banks
    70,747                       58,732                  
Premises and equipment
    68,144                       54,219                  
Other assets
    340,644                       263,497                  
Total assets
  $ 3,336,964                     $ 3,378,754                  
                                                 
                                                 
Liabilities
                                               
NOW accounts
  $ 337,401       0.25 %   $ 411     $ 334,160       0.28 %   $ 456  
Money market accounts
    509,141       0.58 %     1,465       521,124       0.93 %     2,413  
Savings accounts
    156,677       0.59 %     457       155,472       0.85 %     659  
Time deposits >$100,000
    787,888       1.35 %     5,265       816,146       1.64 %     6,654  
Other time deposits
    669,975       1.18 %     3,936       756,092       1.61 %     6,049  
Total interest-bearing deposits
    2,461,082       0.95 %     11,534       2,582,994       1.27 %     16,231  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    57,570       0.34 %     98       57,352       0.65 %     184  
Borrowings
    109,147       1.72 %     932       91,628       1.98 %     899  
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    2,627,799       0.96 %     12,564       2,731,974       1.28 %     17,314  
                                                 
Non-interest-bearing deposits
    327,542                       281,568                  
Other liabilities
    29,338                       17,284                  
Shareholders’ equity
    352,285                       347,928                  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 3,336,964                     $ 3,378,754                  
                                                 
Net yield on interest-earning
assets and net interest income
            4.77 %   $ 67,567               4.25 %   $ 63,339  
Interest rate spread
            4.70 %                     4.14 %        
                                                 
Average prime rate
            3.25 %                     3.25 %        

(1)
Average loans include nonaccruing loans, the effect of which is to lower the average rate shown.

(2)
Includes tax-equivalent adjustments of $773,000 and $626,000 in 2011 and 2010, respectively, to reflect the tax benefit that we receive related to tax-exempt securities, which carry interest rates lower than similar taxable investments due to their tax-exempt status. This amount has been computed assuming a 39% tax rate and is reduced by the related nondeductible portion of interest expense.

Average loans outstanding for the second quarter of 2011 were $2.472 billion, which was 4.0% less than the average loans outstanding for the second quarter of 2010 ($2.576 billion). Average loans outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $2.487 billion, which was 4.4% less than the average loans outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2010 ($2.602 billion). The mix of our loan portfolio remained substantially the same at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010, with approximately 91% of our loans being real estate loans, 6% being commercial, financial, and agricultural loans, and the remaining 3% being consumer installment loans. The majority of our real estate loans are personal and commercial loans where real estate provides additional security for the loan.

Average total deposits outstanding for the second quarter of 2011 were $2.786 billion, which was 1.2% less than the average deposits outstanding for the second quarter of 2010 ($2.819 billion). Average deposits

 
Page 51


outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $2.789 billion, which was 2.7% less than the average deposits outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2010 ($2.865 billion). Generally, we can reinvest funds from deposits at higher yields than the interest rate being paid on those deposits, and therefore increases in deposits typically result in higher amounts of net interest income.

The lower average loan and deposit balances when comparing the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 to the respective periods of 2010 are a result of declines in loans and deposits that we have experienced over the past twelve months. As a result of the weak economy, we have experienced an increase in loan charge-offs and an increase in foreclosure activity, which have reduced our loan balances. Also, loan demand in most of our market areas remains weak, and the pace of loan principal repayments has exceeded new loan originations. With the negative loan growth experienced, we have been able to lessen our reliance on higher cost sources of funding, including internet deposits and large denomination time deposits, which has resulted in lower deposit balances and a lower average cost of funds.

The yields earned on assets increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily as a result of the purchase accounting adjustments previously discussed. The rates paid on liabilities (funding costs) have declined in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily as a result of the maturity and repricing of liabilities that were originated during periods of higher interest rates and our ability to progressively reduce the rates paid on demand deposits. As derived from the above table, in the second quarter of 2011, the average yield on interest-earning assets was 5.77%, a 31 basis point increase from the 5.46% yield in the comparable period of 2010, while the average rate on interest bearing liabilities declined by 30 basis points, from 1.23% in the second quarter of 2010 to 0.93% in the second quarter of 2011.

See additional information regarding net interest income in the section entitled “Interest Rate Risk.”

Our provisions for loan losses and nonperforming assets remain at elevated levels, primarily due to high unemployment rates and declining property values in our market area that negatively impact collateral dependent real estate loans. Our total provision for loan losses was $10.9 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 our total provision for loan losses was $22.3 million compared to $15.6 million for the first six months of 2010. The total provision for loan losses is comprised of provisions for loan losses for non-covered loans and provisions for loan losses for covered loans, as discussed in the following paragraphs.

Our provision for loan losses for non-covered loans amounted to $7.6 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 the provision for loan losses for non-covered loans was $15.2 million compared to $15.6 million for the comparable period of 2010.

Our provisions for loan losses for covered loans amounted to $3.3 million and $7.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, whereas we did not record any provisions for loan losses for covered loans in the first six months of 2010. As previously discussed, the provision for loan losses related to covered loans is offset by an 80% increase to the FDIC indemnification asset, which increases noninterest income.

Our non-covered nonperforming assets amounted to $120 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $117 million at December 31, 2010 and $108 million at June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2011, the ratio of non-covered nonperforming assets to total non-covered assets was 4.25%, compared to 4.16% at December 31, 2010, and 3.89% at June 30, 2010. Our outlook for nonperforming assets is consistent with the recent trend, which is that we do not expect material improvement, nor deterioration, in the near future.

Our ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans was 1.75% for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 1.97% in the first quarter of 2011 and 1.04% in the second quarter of 2010. Our ratio of annualized net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 1.87% compared to 1.03% for the first six months of 2010.

 
Page 52


Our nonperforming assets that are covered by FDIC loss share agreements amounted to $164 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $168 million at December 31, 2010 and $187 million at June 30, 2010. We continue to submit claims to the FDIC on a regular basis pursuant to the loss share agreements.

Total noninterest income was $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $4.5 million for the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we recorded noninterest income of $19.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively. The significant increase in noninterest income for the six month period comparison is primarily attributable to the aforementioned bargain purchase gain recorded in the first quarter of 2011.

Within noninterest income, service charges on deposits declined for the first six months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, amounting to $6.6 million in 2011 compared to $7.1 million in 2010. This decline was primarily attributable to lower overdraft fees, which began declining in the second half of 2010 as a result of fewer instances of customers overdrawing their accounts. This decline was also partially a result of new regulations that took effect in the third quarter of 2010 that limit our ability to charge overdraft fees. For the second quarter of 2011, service charges on deposit accounts increased to $3.7 million from the $3.6 million recorded in the second quarter of 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to new fees on deposit accounts that took effect April 1, 2011. In July 2011, in response to additional regulatory guidance, we implemented changes to our overdraft policies that are expected to reduce overdraft fees by approximately $75,000 to $100,000 per month.

Other service charges, commissions and fees amounted to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, this line item totaled $3.3 million compared to $2.8 million in the comparable period of 2010. The increases in 2011 are primarily attributable to increased debit card usage by our customers. We earn a small fee each time our customers make a debit card transaction. Because the Company has less than $10 billion in assets, it is exempt from recently announced regulatory rules limiting this income.

We continue to experience losses and write-downs on our foreclosed properties due to declining property values in our market area. For the second quarter of 2011, these losses amounted to $2.6 million for covered properties compared to $5.5 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the first six months of 2011, losses on covered properties amounted to $7.5 million compared to $5.5 million for the same period in 2010.

Losses on non-covered foreclosed properties amounted to $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $0.1 million in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, losses on non-covered foreclosed properties amounted to $1.6 million compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2010.

As previously discussed, indemnification asset income is recorded to reflect additional amounts expected to be received from the FDIC due to covered loan and foreclosed property losses arising during the period. For the second quarter of 2011, indemnification asset income totaled $1.8 million compared to $4.4 million the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, indemnification asset income amounted to $6.9 million compared to $4.4 million for the same period of 2010

Noninterest expenses amounted to $22.9 million in the second quarter of 2011, a 4.4% increase over the $22.0 million recorded in the same period of 2010. Noninterest expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $48.0 million, an 8.4% increase from the $44.2 million recorded in the first six months of 2010.

Personnel expense has increased in 2011 due to employees joining the Company in The Bank of Asheville acquisition, as well as higher employee medical expense due to higher claims. Also, we have progressively built our infrastructure to manage increased compliance burdens, collection activities and overall growth of the Company.

 
Page 53


Merger expenses associated with The Bank of Asheville acquisition amounted to $243,000 and $594,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

For the second quarter of 2011, we recorded $7.1 million in other operating expenses, a decline from the $7.6 million recorded in the second quarter of 2010. This decline was primarily attributable to a decrease in FDIC insurance expense resulting from a change in the methodology that the FDIC uses to assess insurance premiums that was effective on April 1, 2011.

The provision for income taxes was $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2011, an effective tax rate of 35.2%, compared to $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2010, an effective tax rate of 35.5%. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our provision for income taxes was $5.8 million, an effective tax rate of 36.3%, compared to $4.7 million, an effective tax rate of 35.9%, for the comparable period of 2010. We expect our effective tax rate to remain at approximately 36-37% for the foreseeable future.

The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income reflect other comprehensive income of $783,000 and $792,000 during the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and other comprehensive income of $979,000 and $1,409,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The primary component of other comprehensive income for the periods presented was changes in unrealized holding gains of our available for sale securities. Our available for sale securities portfolio is predominantly comprised of fixed rate bonds that generally increase in value when market yields for fixed rate bonds decrease and decline in value when market yields for fixed rate bonds increase. Management has evaluated any unrealized losses on individual securities at each period end and determined that there is no other-than-temporary impairment.

 
Page 54


FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets at June 30, 2011 amounted to $3.33 billion, 0.5% higher than a year earlier. Total loans at June 30, 2011 amounted to $2.44 billion, a 4.4% decrease from a year earlier, and total deposits amounted to $2.75 billion, a 1.7% decrease from a year earlier.

The following table presents information regarding the nature of our growth for the twelve months ended June 30, 2011 and for the first six months of 2011.

July 1, 2010 to
June 30, 2011
 
Balance at
beginning of
period
   
Internal
Growth
   
Growth from
Acquisitions
   
Balance at
end of
period
   
Total
percentage
growth
 
Percentage growth,
excluding
acquisitions
   
($ in thousands)
 
       
Loans
  $ 2,554,576       (214,404 )     102,268       2,442,440       -4.4 %     -8.4 %
                                                 
Deposits – Noninterest bearing
  $ 293,555       10,870       18,798       323,223       10.1 %     3.7 %
Deposits – NOW
    356,626       (16,291 )     31,358       371,693       4.2 %     -4.6 %
Deposits – Money market
    494,979       (17,017 )     19,150       497,112       0.4 %     -3.4 %
Deposits – Savings
    157,343       (14,979 )     3,212       145,576       -7.5 %     -9.5 %
Deposits – Brokered
    91,195       69,064       14,902       175,161       92.1 %     75.7 %
Deposits – Internet time
    54,535       (56,778 )     42,920       40,677       -25.4 %     -104.1 %
Deposits – Time>$100,000
    668,044       (113,837 )     13,515       567,722       -15.0 %     -17.0 %
Deposits – Time<$100,000
    678,611       (101,246 )     48,889       626,254       -7.7 %     -14.9 %
Total deposits
  $ 2,794,888       (240,214 )     192,744       2,747,418       -1.7 %     -8.6 %
                                                 
January 1, 2011 to
June 30, 2011
                                               
Loans
  $ 2,454,132       (113,960 )     102,268       2,442,440       0.5 %     -4.6 %
                                                 
Deposits – Noninterest bearing
  $ 292,759       11,666       18,798       323,223       10.4 %     4.0 %
Deposits – NOW
    292,623       47,712       31,358       371,693       27.0 %     16.3 %
Deposits – Money market
    498,312       (20,350 )     19,150       497,112       -0.2 %     -4.1 %
Deposits – Savings
    153,325       (10,961 )     3,212       145,576       -5.1 %     -7.1 %
Deposits – Brokered
    143,554       16,705       14,902       175,161       22.0 %     11.6 %
Deposits – Internet time
    46,801       (49,044 )     42,920       40,677       -13.1 %     -104.8 %
Deposits – Time>$100,000
    602,371       (48,164 )     13,515       567,722       -5.8 %     -8.0 %
Deposits – Time<$100,000
    622,768       (45,403 )     48,889       626,254       0.6 %     -7.3 %
Total deposits
  $ 2,652,513       (97,839 )     192,744       2,747,418       3.6 %     -3.7 %

As derived from the table above, for the twelve months preceding June 30, 2011, our loans decreased by $112 million, or 4.4%. Over that same period, deposits decreased $47 million, or 1.7%. In January 2011, we acquired approximately $102 million in loans and $193 million in deposits in The Bank of Asheville acquisition. For the first six months of 2011, internally generated loans decreased $114 million, or 4.6%, while internally generated deposits decreased $98 million, or 3.7%. We believe internally generated loans have declined due to lower loan demand in the weak economy, as well as an initiative that began in 2008 to require generally higher loan interest rates to better compensate us for our risk. With the decrease in loans experienced, we have been able to lessen our reliance on higher cost sources of funding, including internet deposits and large denomination time deposits, which has resulted in lower deposit balances.

The mix of our loan portfolio remains substantially the same at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010. The majority of our real estate loans are personal and commercial loans where real estate provides additional security for the loan.

 
Page 55


Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements presents additional detailed information regarding our mix of loans, including a break-out between loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements and non-covered loans.

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets are defined as nonaccrual loans, restructured loans, loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest, and other real estate. As previously discussed, as a result of two FDIC-assisted transactions, we entered into loss share agreements, which afford us significant protection from losses from all loans and other real estate acquired in the acquisition.

Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the financial risk of the acquired loans and foreclosed real estate are significantly different from those assets not covered under the loss share agreements. Accordingly, we present separately loans subject to the loss share agreements as “covered loans” in the information below and loans that are not subject to the loss share agreements as “non-covered loans.”

Nonperforming assets are summarized as follows:

ASSET QUALITY DATA ($ in thousands)
 
June 30, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
                   
Non-covered nonperforming assets
                 
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 71,570       62,326       73,152  
Restructured loans – accruing
    16,893       33,677       20,392  
Accruing loans >90 days past due
                 
Total non-covered nonperforming loans
    88,463       96,003       93,544  
Other real estate
    31,849       21,081       14,690  
Total non-covered nonperforming assets
  $ 120,312       117,084       108,234  
                         
Covered nonperforming assets (1)
                       
Nonaccrual loans (2)
  $ 37,057       58,466       98,669  
Restructured loans – accruing
    24,325       14,359       8,450  
Accruing loans > 90 days past due
                 
Total covered nonperforming loans
    61,382       72,825       107,119  
Other real estate
    102,883       94,891       80,074  
Total covered nonperforming assets
  $ 164,265       167,716       187,193  
                         
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 284,577       284,800       295,427  
                         
Asset Quality Ratios – All Assets
                       
Net charge-offs to average loans - annualized
    2.22 %     4.17 %     0.85 %
Nonperforming loans to total loans
    6.14 %     6.88 %     7.86 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets
    8.54 %     8.69 %     8.90 %
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
    1.64 %     2.01 %     1.65 %
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
    27.31 %     29.28 %     21.04 %
                         
Asset Quality Ratios – Based on Non-covered Assets only
                       
Net charge-offs to average non-covered loans - annualized
    1.75 %     3.10 %     1.04 %
Non-covered nonperforming loans to non-covered loans
    4.33 %     4.61 %     4.46 %
Non-covered nonperforming assets to total non-covered assets
    4.25 %     4.16 %     3.89 %
Allowance for loan losses to non-covered loans
    1.69 %     1.84 %     2.01 %
Allowance for loan losses to non-covered nonperforming loans
    38.96 %     39.87 %     45.13 %
                         

(1) Covered nonperforming assets consist of assets that are included in loss share agreements with the FDIC.
(2) At June 30, 2011, the contractual balance of the nonaccrual loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements was $69.4 million. 


 
Page 56


We have reviewed the collateral for our nonperforming assets, including nonaccrual loans, and have included this review among the factors considered in the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses discussed below.

Consistent with the weak economy, we have experienced high levels of loan losses, delinquencies and nonperforming assets. Our non-covered nonperforming assets were $120.3 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $117.1 million at December 31, 2010 and $108.2 million at June 30, 2010.

The following is the composition, by loan type, of all of our nonaccrual loans (covered and non-covered) at each period end, as classified for regulatory purposes:

($ in thousands)
 
 
At June 30,
2011
   
At December 31,
2010
   
At June 30,
2010
 
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 2,755       2,595       3,603  
Real estate – construction, land development, and other land loans
    45,694       54,781       83,626  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
    27,981       36,715       45,067  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans/lines of credit
    6,534       8,584       7,527  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
    22,907       17,578       31,254  
Installment loans to individuals
    2,756       539       744  
Total nonaccrual loans
  $ 108,627       120,792       171,821  

The following segregates our nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011 into covered and non-covered loans, as classified for regulatory purposes:

($ in thousands)
 
 
 
Covered
Nonaccrual
Loans
   
Non-covered
Nonaccrual
Loans
   
Total
Nonaccrual
Loans
 
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 327       2,428       2,755  
Real estate – construction, land development, and other land loans
    15,055       30,639       45,694  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
    11,269       16,712       27,981  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans/lines of credit
    2,040       4,494       6,534  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
    8,356       14,551       22,907  
Installment loans to individuals
    10       2,746       2,756  
Total nonaccrual loans
  $ 37,057       71,570       108,627  

The following segregates our nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2010 into covered and non-covered loans, as classified for regulatory purposes:

($ in thousands)
 
 
 
Covered
Nonaccrual
Loans
   
Non-covered
Nonaccrual
Loans
   
Total
Nonaccrual
Loans
 
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 163       2,432       2,595  
Real estate – construction, land development, and other land loans
    30,846       23,935       54,781  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
    16,343       20,372       36,715  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans/lines of credit
    4,059       4,525       8,584  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
    7,039       10,539       17,578  
Installment loans to individuals
    16       523       539  
Total nonaccrual loans
  $ 58,466       62,326       120,792  

At June 30, 2011, troubled debt restructurings (covered and non-covered) amounted to $41.2 million, compared to $48.0 million at December 31, 2010, and $28.8 million at June 30, 2010. The decline from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011 is primarily a result of several troubled debt restructurings that were placed on nonaccrual status.

Other real estate includes foreclosed, repossessed, and idled properties. Non-covered other real estate has increased over the past year, amounting to $31.8 million at June 30, 2011, $21.1 million at December 31, 2010, and $14.7 million at June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2011, we also held $102.9 million in other real estate that is

 
Page 57


subject to the loss share agreements with the FDIC. We believe that the fair values of the items of other real estate, less estimated costs to sell, equal or exceed their respective carrying values at the dates presented.

The following table presents the detail of all of our other real estate at each period end (covered and non-covered):

($ in thousands)
 
At June 30, 2011
   
At December 31, 2010
   
At June 30, 2010
 
Vacant land
  $ 88,239       81,185       67,015  
1-4 family residential properties
    37,349       28,146       23,414  
Commercial real estate
    9,144       6,641       4,335  
Other
                 
Total other real estate
  $ 134,732       115,972       94,764  

The following segregates our other real estate at June 30, 2011 into covered and non-covered:

($ in thousands)
 
 
Covered Other
Real Estate
   
Non-covered Other
Real Estate
   
Total Other Real
Estate
 
Vacant land
  $ 75,321       12,918       88,239  
1-4 family residential properties
    22,665       14,684       37,349  
Commercial real estate
    4,897       4,247       9,144  
Other
                 
Total other real estate
  $ 102,883       31,849       134,732  

 
Page 58


The following table presents geographical information regarding our nonperforming assets at June 30, 2011.

   
As of June 30, 2011
 
($ in thousands)
 
 
 
Covered
   
Non-covered
   
Total
   
Total Loans
   
Nonperforming
Loans to Total
Loans
 
                               
Nonaccrual Loans and
Troubled Debt Restructurings (1)
                             
Eastern Region (NC)
  $ 49,088       21,813       70,901     $ 544,000       13.0 %
Triangle Region (NC)
          25,881       25,881       749,000       3.5 %
Triad Region (NC)
          18,968       18,968       389,000       4.9 %
Charlotte Region (NC)
          2,317       2,317       96,000       2.4 %
Southern Piedmont Region (NC)
    37       2,213       2,250       221,000       1.0 %
Western Region (NC)
    11,562       25       11,587       86,000       13.5 %
South Carolina Region
    695       10,856       11,551       160,000       7.2 %
Virginia Region
          4,948       4,948       185,000       2.7 %
Other
          1,442       1,442       12,000       12.0 %
Total nonaccrual loans and
troubled debt restructurings
  $ 61,382       88,463       149,845     $ 2,442,000       6.1 %
                                         
Other Real Estate (1)
                                       
Eastern Region (NC)
  $ 95,562       9,408       104,970                  
Triangle Region (NC)
          7,830       7,830                  
Triad Region (NC)
          6,664       6,664                  
Charlotte Region (NC)
          4,842       4,842                  
Southern Piedmont Region (NC)
          895       895                  
Western Region (NC)
    7,279             7,279                  
South Carolina Region
    42       1,626       1,668                  
Virginia Region
          584       584                  
Other
                                 
Total other real estate
  $ 102,883       31,849       134,732                  

 
(1)
The counties comprising each region are as follows:
Eastern North Carolina Region - New Hanover, Brunswick, Duplin, Dare, Beaufort, Onslow, Carteret
Triangle North Carolina Region - Moore, Lee, Harnett, Chatham, Wake
Triad North Carolina Region - Montgomery, Randolph, Davidson, Rockingham, Guilford, Stanly
Charlotte North Carolina Region - Iredell, Cabarrus, Rowan
Southern Piedmont North Carolina Region - Anson, Richmond, Scotland, Robeson, Bladen, Columbus
Western North Carolina Region - Buncombe
South Carolina Region - Chesterfield, Dillon, Florence, Horry
Virginia Region - Wythe, Washington, Montgomery, Pulaski

 
Summary of Loan Loss Experience

The allowance for loan losses is created by direct charges to operations. Losses on loans are charged against the allowance in the period in which such loans, in management’s opinion, become uncollectible. The recoveries realized during the period are credited to this allowance.

We have no foreign loans, few agricultural loans and do not engage in significant lease financing or highly leveraged transactions. Commercial loans are diversified among a variety of industries. The majority of our real estate loans are primarily personal and commercial loans where real estate provides additional security for the loan. Collateral for virtually all of these loans is located within our principal market area.

The current economic environment has resulted in an increase in our classified and nonperforming assets, which has led to elevated provisions for loan losses. Our total provision for loan losses was $10.9 million for

 
Page 59


the second quarter of 2011 compared to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 our total provision for loan losses was $22.3 million compared to $15.6 million for the first six months of 2010. The total provision for loan losses is comprised of provisions for loan losses for non-covered loans and provisions for loan losses for covered loans, as discussed in the following paragraphs.

Our provision for loan losses for non-covered loans amounted to $7.6 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 the provision for loan losses for non-covered loans was $15.2 million compared to $15.6 million for the comparable period of 2010.

Our provisions for loan losses for covered loans amounted to $3.3 million and $7.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, whereas we did not record any provisions for loan losses for covered loans in the first six months of 2010. As previously discussed, the provision for loan losses related to covered loans is offset by an 80% increase to the FDIC indemnification asset, which increases noninterest income.

For the first six months of 2011, we recorded $31.7 million in net charge-offs, compared to $10.8 million for the comparable period of 2010. The net charge-offs in 2011 included $12.7 million of covered loans and $19.0 million of non-covered loans, whereas in 2010 the entire $10.8 million of net charge-offs related to non-covered loans. The charge-offs in 2011 continue a trend that began in 2010, with charge-offs being concentrated in the construction and land development real estate categories. These types of loans have been impacted the most by the recession and decline in new housing. Included in the $19.0 million of non-covered loan net charge-offs in 2011 were $7.3 million in partial charge-offs. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded specific reserves on collateral-deficient nonaccrual loans within the allowance for loans losses, but did not record charge-offs until the loans had been foreclosed upon.

The allowance for loan losses amounted to $40.0 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $49.4 million at December 31, 2010 and $42.2 million at June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010, the allowance for loan losses attributable to covered loans was $5.5 million, $11.2 million, and zero, respectively. The allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans amounted to $34.5 million, $38.3 million, and $42.2 million at June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010, respectively.

We believe our reserve levels are adequate to cover probable loan losses on the loans outstanding as of each reporting date. It must be emphasized, however, that the determination of the reserve using our procedures and methods rests upon various judgments and assumptions about economic conditions and other factors affecting loans. No assurance can be given that we will not in any particular period sustain loan losses that are sizable in relation to the amounts reserved or that subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of conditions and factors then prevailing, will not require significant changes in the allowance for loan losses or future charges to earnings. See “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Loan Losses” above.

In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses and value of other real estate. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance or the carrying value of other real estate based on their judgments about information available at the time of their examinations.

 
Page 60


For the periods indicated, the following table summarizes our balances of loans outstanding, average loans outstanding, changes in the allowance for loan losses arising from charge-offs and recoveries, additions to the allowance for loan losses that have been charged to expense, and additions that were recorded related to acquisitions.

   
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
   
Twelve Months
Ended
December 31,
   
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
 
($ in thousands)
 
2011
   
2010
   
2010
 
Loans outstanding at end of period
  $ 2,442,440       2,454,132       2,554,576  
Average amount of loans outstanding
  $ 2,486,963       2,554,401       2,601,782  
                         
Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year
  $ 49,430       37,343       37,343  
Provision for loan losses
    22,277       54,562       15,626  
      71,707       91,905       52,969  
Loans charged off:
                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
    (1,077 )     (4,481 )     (2,877 )
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    (17,528 )     (22,665 )     (2,932 )
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
    (7,966 )     (6,032 )     (1,490 )
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit
    (1,458 )     (4,973 )     (1,349 )
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
    (3,434 )     (2,916 )     (1,412 )
Installment loans to individuals
    (1,066 )     (2,499 )     (1,282 )
Total charge-offs
    (32,529 )     (43,566 )     (11,342 )
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
    27       61       15  
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    255       113       33  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
    140       357       201  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit
    121       131       96  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
    32       33       10  
Installment loans to individuals
    252       396       233  
Total recoveries
    827       1,091       588  
Net charge-offs
    (31,702 )     (42,475 )     (10,754 )
Allowance for loan losses, at end of period
  $ 40,005       49,430       42,215  
                         
Ratios:
                       
Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans
    2.57 %     1.66 %     0.83 %
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans at end of period
    1.64 %     2.01 %     1.65 %

 
Page 61


The following table discloses the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2011, segregated into covered and non-covered. All allowance for loan loss activity in the first six months of 2010 related to non-covered loans.

   
As of June 30, 2011
 
($ in thousands)
 
Covered
   
Non-covered
   
Total
 
                   
Loans outstanding at end of period
  $ 401,726       2,040,714       2,442,440  
Average amount of loans outstanding
  $ 436,859       2,050,104       2,486,963  
                         
Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year
  $ 11,155       38,275       49,430  
Provision for loan losses
    7,100       15,177       22,277  
      18,255       53,452       71,707  
Loans charged off:
                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
    (13 )     (1,064 )     (1,077 )
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
    (7,954 )     (9,574 )     (17,528 )
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
    (3,393 )     (4,573 )     (7,966 )
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit
    (198 )     (1,260 )     (1,458 )
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
    (1,052 )     (2,382 )     (3,434 )
Installment loans to individuals
    (105 )     (961 )     (1,066 )
Total charge-offs
    (12,715 )     (19,814 )     (32,529 )
                         
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
          27       27  
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans
          255       255  
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages
          140       140  
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit
          121       121  
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other
          32       32  
Installment loans to individuals
          252       252  
Total recoveries
          827       827  
Net charge-offs
    (12,715 )     (18,987 )     (31,702 )
Allowance for loan losses, at end of period
  $ 5,540       34,465       40,005  

Based on the results of our loan analysis and grading program and our evaluation of the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011, there have been no material changes to the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among the various categories of loans since December 31, 2010.

Liquidity, Commitments, and Contingencies

Our liquidity is determined by our ability to convert assets to cash or acquire alternative sources of funds to meet the needs of our customers who are withdrawing or borrowing funds, and to maintain required reserve levels, pay expenses and operate our business on an ongoing basis. Our primary internal liquidity sources are net income from operations, cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and other short-term investments. Our securities portfolio is comprised almost entirely of readily marketable securities, which could also be sold to provide cash.

In addition to internally generated liquidity sources, we have the ability to obtain borrowings from the following four sources - 1) an approximately $417 million line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank (of which $92 million was outstanding at June 30, 2011), 2) a $50 million overnight federal funds line of credit with a correspondent bank (none of which was outstanding at June 30, 2011), 3) an approximately $83 million line of credit through the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s discount window (none of which was outstanding at June 30, 2011) and 4) a $10 million line of credit with a commercial bank (none of which was outstanding at June 30, 2011). In addition to the outstanding borrowings from the FHLB that reduce the available borrowing capacity of that line of credit, our borrowing capacity was further reduced by $203 million at both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, as a result of our pledging letters of credit for public deposits at each of those dates. Unused and available lines of credit amounted to $265 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $194 million at December 31, 2010.

 
Page 62


Our overall liquidity has increased since June 30, 2010. Our loans have decreased $112 million, while our deposits have only decreased by $47 million. Our liquid assets (cash and securities) as a percentage of our total deposits and borrowings increased from 14.5% at June 30, 2010 to 15.8% at June 30, 2011.

We believe our liquidity sources, including unused lines of credit, are at an acceptable level and remain adequate to meet our operating needs in the foreseeable future. We will continue to monitor our liquidity position carefully and will explore and implement strategies to increase liquidity if deemed appropriate.

The amount and timing of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments has not changed materially since December 31, 2010, detail of which is presented in Table 18 on page 83 of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We are not involved in any legal proceedings that, in our opinion, could have a material effect on our consolidated financial position.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Derivative Financial Instruments

Off-balance sheet arrangements include transactions, agreements, or other contractual arrangements in which we have obligations or provide guarantees on behalf of an unconsolidated entity. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements of this kind other than repayment guarantees associated with trust preferred securities.

Derivative financial instruments include futures, forwards, interest rate swaps, options contracts, and other financial instruments with similar characteristics. We have not engaged in derivative activities through June 30, 2011, and have no current plans to do so.

Capital Resources

We are regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (FED) and are subject to the securities registration and public reporting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our banking subsidiary is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks. We are not aware of any recommendations of regulatory authorities or otherwise which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

We must comply with regulatory capital requirements established by the FED and FDIC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. These capital standards require us to maintain minimum ratios of “Tier 1” capital to total risk-weighted assets and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively. Tier 1 capital is comprised of total shareholders’ equity calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), less intangible assets, and total capital is comprised of Tier 1 capital plus certain adjustments, the largest of which is our allowance for loan losses. Risk-weighted assets refer to our on- and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for their related risk levels using formulas set forth in FED and FDIC regulations.

In addition to the risk-based capital requirements described above, we are subject to a leverage capital requirement, which calls for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital (as defined above) to quarterly average total assets of 3.00% to 5.00%, depending upon the institution’s composite ratings as determined by its regulators. The FED has not advised us of any requirement specifically applicable to us.

 
Page 63


At June 30, 2011, our capital ratios exceeded the regulatory minimum ratios discussed above. The following table presents our capital ratios and the regulatory minimums discussed above for the periods indicated.

   
June 30,
2011
 
March 31,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
 
June 30,
2010
Risk-based capital ratios:
                       
Tier I capital to Tier I risk adjusted assets
    15.74 %     15.50 %     15.31 %     15.17 %
Minimum required Tier I capital
    4.00 %     4.00 %     4.00 %     4.00 %
                                 
Total risk-based capital to Tier II risk-adjusted assets
    17.00 %     16.76 %     16.57 %     16.43 %
Minimum required total risk-based capital
    8.00 %     8.00 %     8.00 %     8.00 %
                                 
Leverage capital ratios:
                               
Tier I leverage capital to adjusted most recent quarter average assets
    10.17 %     10.04 %     10.28 %     10.04 %
Minimum required Tier I leverage capital
    4.00 %     4.00 %     4.00 %     4.00 %

Our bank subsidiary is also subject to capital requirements similar to those discussed above. The bank subsidiary’s capital ratios do not vary materially from our capital ratios presented above. At June 30, 2011, our bank subsidiary exceeded the minimum ratios established by the FED and FDIC.

In addition to regulatory capital ratios, we also closely monitor our ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets (“TCE Ratio”). Our TCE ratio was 6.65% at June 30, 2011 compared to 6.52% at December 31, 2010 and 6.56% at June 30, 2010.

 
Page 64


BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MATTERS

The following is a list of business development and other miscellaneous matters affecting First Bancorp and First Bank, our bank subsidiary, since January 1, 2011 that have not previously been discussed.

 
·
On May 26, 2011, we announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.08 cents per share payable on July 25, 2011 to shareholders of record on June 30, 2011. This is the same dividend rate we declared in the second quarter of 2010.

 
·
We expect to file for regulatory approval to open a branch in Salem, Virginia. This would represent our seventh branch in southwestern Virginia.

SHARE REPURCHASES

We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the first six months of 2011. At June 30, 2011, we had approximately 235,000 shares available for repurchase under existing authority from our board of directors. We may repurchase these shares in open market and privately negotiated transactions, as market conditions and our liquidity warrants, subject to compliance with applicable regulations. However, as a result of our participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, we are prohibited from buying back stock without the permission of the Treasury until the preferred stock issued under that program is redeemed. See also Part II, Item 2 “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.”

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

INTEREST RATE RISK (INCLUDING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK)

Net interest income is our most significant component of earnings. Notwithstanding changes in volumes of loans and deposits, our level of net interest income is continually at risk due to the effect that changes in general market interest rate trends have on interest yields earned and paid with respect to our various categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It is our policy to maintain portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities with maturities and repricing opportunities that will afford protection, to the extent practical, against wide interest rate fluctuations. Our exposure to interest rate risk is analyzed on a regular basis by management using standard GAP reports, maturity reports, and an asset/liability software model that simulates future levels of interest income and expense based on current interest rates, expected future interest rates, and various intervals of “shock” interest rates. Over the years, we have been able to maintain a fairly consistent yield on average earning assets (net interest margin). Over the past five calendar years, our net interest margin has ranged from a low of 3.74% (realized in 2008) to a high of 4.39% (realized in 2010). During that five year period, the prime rate of interest has ranged from a low of 3.25% (which was the rate as of June 30, 2011) to a high of 8.25%. The consistency of the net interest margin is aided by the relatively low level of long-term interest rate exposure that we maintain. At June 30, 2011, approximately 84% of our interest-earning assets are subject to repricing within five years (because they are either adjustable rate assets or they are fixed rate assets that mature) and approximately 100% of our interest-bearing liabilities reprice within five years.

Using stated maturities for all fixed rate instruments except mortgage-backed securities (which are allocated in the periods of their expected payback) and securities and borrowings with call features that are expected to be called (which are shown in the period of their expected call), at June 30, 2011, we had approximately $774 million more in interest-bearing liabilities that are subject to interest rate changes within one year than earning assets. This generally would indicate that net interest income would experience downward pressure in a rising interest rate environment and would benefit from a declining interest rate environment. However, this method of analyzing interest sensitivity only measures the magnitude of the timing differences and does not address earnings, market

 
Page 65


value, or management actions. Also, interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. In addition to the effects of “when” various rate-sensitive products reprice, market rate changes may not result in uniform changes in rates among all products. For example, included in interest-bearing liabilities subject to interest rate changes within one year at June 30, 2011 are deposits totaling $1.0 billion comprised of NOW, savings, and certain types of money market deposits with interest rates set by management. These types of deposits historically have not repriced with, or in the same proportion, as general market indicators.

Overall we believe that in the near term (twelve months), net interest income will not likely experience significant downward pressure from rising interest rates. Similarly, we would not expect a significant increase in near term net interest income from falling interest rates. Generally, when rates change, our interest-sensitive assets that are subject to adjustment reprice immediately at the full amount of the change, while our interest-sensitive liabilities that are subject to adjustment reprice at a lag to the rate change and typically not to the full extent of the rate change. In the short-term (less than six months), this results in us being asset-sensitive, meaning that our net interest income benefits from an increase in interest rates and is negatively impacted by a decrease in interest rates. However, in the twelve-month horizon, the impact of having a higher level of interest-sensitive liabilities lessens the short-term effects of changes in interest rates.

The Federal Reserve has made no changes to interest rates since 2008, and since that time the difference between market driven short-term interest rates and longer-term interest rates has generally widened, with short-term interest rates steadily declining and longer term interest rates not declining by as much. The higher long term interest rate environment enhanced our ability to require higher interest rates on loans. As it relates to funding, we have been able to reprice many of our maturing time deposits at lower interest rates. We were also able to generally decrease the rates we paid on other categories of deposits as a result of declining short-term interest rates in the marketplace and an increase in liquidity that lessened our need to offer premium interest rates.

As previously discussed in the section “Net Interest Income,” our net interest income was impacted by certain purchase accounting adjustments related to our acquisitions of Cooperative Bank, The Bank of Asheville, and Great Pee Dee Bancorp. The purchase accounting adjustments related to the premium amortization on loans, deposits and borrowings are based on amortization schedules and are thus systematic and predictable. The accretion of the loan discount on loans acquired from Cooperative Bank and The Bank of Asheville, which amounted to $6.5 million and $3.1 million for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, is less predictable and could be materially different among periods. This is because of the magnitude of the discounts that were initially recorded ($280 million in total) and the fact that the accretion being recorded is dependent on both the credit quality of the acquired loans and the impact of any accelerated loan repayments, including payoffs. If the credit quality of the loans declines, some, or all, of the remaining discount will cease to be accreted into income. If the underlying loans experience accelerated paydowns or are paid off, the remaining discount will be accreted into income on an accelerated basis, which in the event of total payoff will result in the remaining discount being entirely accreted into income in the period of the payoff. Each of these factors is difficult to predict and susceptible to volatility. Our net interest margin on a core basis, excluding the loan discount interest accretion, was 4.35% for the second quarter of 2011, 4.26% for the first quarter of 2011, 4.33% for the fourth quarter of 2010, and 4.12% for the second quarter of 2010.

Based on our most recent interest rate modeling, which assumes no changes in interest rates for 2011 (federal funds rate = 0.25%, prime = 3.25%), we project that our net interest margin for the remainder of 2011, on a core basis, will remain relatively consistent with the net interest margins recently realized. With interest rates having been stable for a relatively long period of time, most of our interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities have been repriced at today’s interest rates. We expect a continued decline in loans throughout the remainder of 2011 (although not to the magnitude experienced in 2010) that will reduce interest income slightly.

We have no market risk sensitive instruments held for trading purposes, nor do we maintain any foreign currency positions.

 
Page 66


See additional discussion regarding net interest income, as well as discussion of the changes in the annual net interest margin in the section entitled “Net Interest Income” above.

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, which are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in allowing timely decisions regarding disclosure to be made about material information required to be included in our periodic reports with the SEC. In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting has occurred during, or subsequent to, the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 
Page 67


Part II. Other Information

Item 1A – Risk Factors

In addition to those risk factors discussed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, we add the following risk factors.

The January 21, 2011 acquisition of all of the deposits and borrowings, and substantially all of the assets, of The Bank of Asheville could adversely affect our financial results and condition if we fail to integrate the acquisition properly.

The acquisition of The Bank of Asheville will require the integration of the businesses of First Bank and The Bank of Asheville. The integration process may result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of ongoing businesses and the loss of customers and their business and deposits. It may also divert management attention and resources from other operations and limit our ability to pursue other acquisitions. There is no assurance that we will realize financial benefits from this acquisition.

The $10.2 million gain we recorded upon the acquisition of The Bank of Asheville is a preliminary amount and could be retroactively decreased.

We accounted for The Bank of Asheville acquisition under the purchase method of accounting, recording the acquired assets and liabilities of The Bank of Asheville at fair value based on preliminary purchase accounting adjustments. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, particularly illiquid assets and liabilities, is a complicated process involving a significant amount of judgment regarding estimates and assumptions. Based on the preliminary adjustments made, the fair value of the assets we acquired exceeded the fair value of the liabilities assumed by $10.2 million, which resulted in a gain for our company. Under purchase accounting, we have until one year after the acquisition date to finalize the fair value adjustments, meaning that until then we could materially adjust the preliminary fair value estimates of The Bank of Asheville’s assets and liabilities based on new or updated information. Such adjustments could reduce or eliminate the extent by which the assets acquired exceeded the liabilities assumed and would result in a retroactive decrease to the $10.2 million gain that we recorded as of the acquisition date, which would reduce our earnings.

We may incur loan losses related to The Bank of Asheville that are materially greater than we originally projected.

The Bank of Asheville had a significant amount of deteriorating and nonperforming loans that ultimately led to the closure of the bank. When we placed our bid with the FDIC to assume the assets and liabilities of The Bank of Asheville, we estimated an amount of future loan losses that we believed would occur and factored those expected losses into our bid amount. Estimating loan losses on an entire portfolio of loans is a difficult process that is dependent on a significant amount of judgment and estimates, especially for loan portfolios like The Bank of Asheville’s with a high concentration of deteriorating and nonperforming loans. If we underestimated the extent of those losses, it will negatively impact us. Within a one year period, if we discover that we materially understated the loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the acquisition date, it will retroactively reduce or eliminate the $10.2 million gain discussed above. Beyond the one year period, or if we determine that losses arose after the acquisition date, the additional losses will be reflected as provisions for loan losses, which would reduce our earnings.

 
Page 68


Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
                         
Period
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
   
Average Price Paid per
Share
   
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
   
Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs (1)
 
April 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011
   
     
     
      234,667  
May 1, 2011 to May 31, 2011
   
     
     
      234,667  
June 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011
   
     
     
      234,667  
Total
   
     
     
      234,667 (2)

Footnotes to the Above Table
(1)
All shares available for repurchase are pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase authorizations. On July 30, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved the repurchase of 375,000 shares of our common stock. The repurchase authorization does not have an expiration date. Subject to the restrictions related to our participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, there are no plans or programs we have determined to terminate prior to expiration, or under which we do not intend to make further purchases.

(2)
The table above does not include shares that were used by option holders to satisfy the exercise price of the call options we issued to our employees and directors pursuant to our stock option plans. There were no such exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

There were no unregistered sales of our securities during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Item 6 - Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this report or, as noted, are incorporated by reference. Management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements are marked with an asterisk (*).

3.a
Articles of Incorporation of the Company and amendments thereto were filed as Exhibits 3.a.i through 3.a.v to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, and are incorporated herein by reference. Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation were filed as Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 13, 2009, and are incorporated herein by reference. Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation were filed as Exhibit 3.1.b to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3D filed on June 29, 2010, and are incorporated herein by reference.

3.b
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company were filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 23, 2009, and are incorporated herein by reference.

4.a
Form of Common Stock Certificate was filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, and is incorporated herein by reference.

4.b
Form of Certificate for Series A Preferred Stock was filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 13, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.

4.c
Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock was filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 13, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference.

 
Page 69


10.1
Purchase and Assumption Agreement among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of The Bank of Asheville, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and First Bank, dated as of January 21, 2011, was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2011, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
101
The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL):  (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (1)

 
________________
 
(1)
To be furnished through an amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q on or before September 8, 2011. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.  
 
Copies of exhibits are available upon written request to: First Bancorp, Anna G. Hollers, Executive Vice President, P.O. Box 508, Troy, NC 27371

 
Page 70


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

   
FIRST BANCORP
   
           
 
August 9, 2011
BY:/s/
Jerry L. Ocheltree
   
    Jerry L. Ocheltree  
    President  
    (Principal Executive Officer),  
    Treasurer and Director  
           
 
August 9, 2011
BY:/s/
Anna G. Hollers
   
    Anna G. Hollers  
    Executive Vice President,  
    Secretary  
    and Chief Operating Officer  
           
 
August 9, 2011
BY:/s/
Eric P. Credle
   
    Eric P. Credle  
    Executive Vice President  
    and Chief Financial Officer  
 
 
Page 71