UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC  20549

____________

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

[X]         QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

 

[   ]         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793

 

First BanCorp.

 

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes☑    No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 

 

Yes ☑    No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

                             Large accelerated filer ☐                                                                                              Accelerated filer ☑

                              

                             Non-accelerated filer    ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                   Smaller reporting company ☐

                                                                                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                                   Emerging growth company    ☐

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act. ☐   

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 Yes  ☐    No ☑

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Common stock: 216,208,829 shares outstanding as of October 31, 2017.

FIRST BANCORP.

INDEX PAGE

 

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which are subject to the safe harbor created by such sections.  When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by First BanCorp. (the “Corporation”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases or in other public or stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “would,” “intends,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “should,” “anticipate,” “look forward,” “believes,” and other terms of similar meaning or import in connection with any discussion of future operating, financial or other performance are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”

 

First BanCorp. wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and to advise readers that these forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates, and assumptions by us that are difficult to predict.  Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. 

 

    The two hurricanes that affected the Corporation’s service area during the third quarter of 2017 are discussed below in Note 2 to the financial statements, in the “Executive Summary” section and various other sections of “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” There is pervasive uncertainty surrounding the future economic conditions that will emerge in the storm-affected areas. As a consequence, estimates of the financial impact of these disasters on the Corporation are subject to greater uncertainty than is inherent in other forward-looking statements. The more significant estimates are included in the discussion of the provision for loan and lease losses and the discussion of casualty and disaster response costs and related insurance coverages.

 

    These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the risks described or referenced below in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and the following:

 

·         the actual pace and magnitude of economic recovery in the regions impacted by the two hurricanes that affected the Corporation’s service areas during the third quarter of 2017 compared to Management’s current views on the economic recovery;

 

·         uncertainties about how and when rebuilding will take place in the regions affected by the recent storms, including the rebuilding of the public infrastructure, such as Puerto Rico’s powergrid, what level of government, private of philanthropic funds will be invested in the affected communities, how many displaced individuals will return to their homes in both the short- and long-term, and what other demographic changes will take place, if any;

 

·         uncertainty as to the ultimate outcomes of actions taken, or those that may be taken, by the Puerto Rico government, or the oversight board established by the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) to address Puerto Rico’s financial problems, including the filing of a form of bankruptcy under Title III of PROMESA that provides a court debt restructuring process similar to U.S. bankruptcy protection and the effect of measures included in the Puerto Rico government fiscal plan, or any revisions to it, on our clients and loan portfolios;

 

·         the ability of the Puerto Rico government or any of its public corporations or other instrumentalities to repay its respective debt obligations, including the effect of payment defaults on the Puerto Rico government general obligations, bonds of the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (the “GDB”) and certain bonds of government public corporations, and recent and any future downgrades of the long-term and short-term debt ratings of the Puerto Rico government, which could exacerbate Puerto Rico’s adverse economic conditions and, in turn, further adversely impact the Corporation;

 

 

·         uncertainty about whether the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “New York FED” or “Federal Reserve”) will provide approvals for receiving dividends from FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”) or for making payments of dividends on non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, or payments on trust preferred securities or subordinated debt, incurring, increasing or guaranteeing debt or repurchasing any capital securities, despite the consents that have enabled the Corporation to pay quarterly interest payments on the Corporation’s subordinated debentures associated with its trust preferred securities since the second quarter of 2016, and to pay monthly dividends on the non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock since December 2016;

 

·         a decrease in demand for the Corporation’s products and services and lower revenues and earnings because of the continued recession in Puerto Rico;

 

·         uncertainty as to the availability of certain funding sources, such as brokered certificates of deposit (“brokered CDs”);

 

·         the Corporation’s reliance on brokered CDs to fund operations and provide liquidity;

 

·         the risk of not being able to fulfill the Corporation’s cash obligations or resume paying dividends to the Corporation’s common stockholders in the future due to the Corporation’s need to receive regulatory approvals to declare or pay any dividends and to take dividends or any other form of payment representing a reduction in capital from FirstBank or FirstBank’s failure to generate sufficient cash flow to make a dividend payment to the Corporation;

 

·         the weakness of the real estate markets and of the consumer and commercial sectors and their impact on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loans and other assets, which have contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other things, high levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provisions for loan and lease losses, and may subject the Corporation to further risk from loan defaults and foreclosures;

 

·         the ability of FirstBank to realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets subject to the remaining valuation allowance;

 

·         adverse changes in general economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the United States (“U.S.”), and the U.S. Virgin Islands (“USVI”), and British Virgin Islands (“BVI”), including the interest rate environment, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices, and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which reduced interest margins and affected funding sources, and have affected demand for all of the Corporation’s products and services and reduced the Corporation’s revenues and earnings and the value of the Corporation’s assets, and may continue to have these effects;

 

·         an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones;

 

·         the risk that additional portions of the unrealized losses in the Corporation’s investment portfolio are determined to be other-than-temporary, including additional impairments on the Corporation’s remaining $8.0 million of the Puerto Rico government’s debt securities;

 

·         uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the U.S., the USVI and the BVI, which could affect the Corporation’s financial condition or performance and could cause the Corporation’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from prior results and anticipated or projected results;

 

 

·         changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the U.S. federal government and the Puerto Rico and other governments, including those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the New York FED, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), government-sponsored housing agencies, and regulators in Puerto Rico, the USVI and the BVI;

 

·         the risk of possible failure or circumvention of controls and procedures and the risk that the Corporation’s risk management policies may not be adequate;

 

·         the risk that the FDIC may increase the deposit insurance premium and/or require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase in the Corporation’s non-interest expenses;

 

·         the impact on the Corporation’s results of operations and financial condition of acquisitions and dispositions;

 

·         a need to recognize impairments on the Corporation’s financial instruments, goodwill or other intangible assets relating to acquisitions;

 

·         the risk that downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s long-term senior debt will adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to access necessary external funds;

 

·         the impact on the Corporation’s businesses, business practices and results of operations of a potential higher interest rate environment;

 

·         uncertainty as to whether FirstBank will be able to satisfy its regulators regarding, among other things, its asset quality, liquidity plans, maintenance of capital levels and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and related requirements; and

 

·         general competitive factors and industry consolidation.

 

    The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any “forward-looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except as required by the federal securities laws.

 

Investors should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as well as “Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors,” in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.

  

FIRST BANCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Unaudited)

 

FIRST BANCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME

(Unaudited)

FIRST BANCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(Unaudited)

FIRST BANCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 (Unaudited) 

FIRST BANCORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Unaudited)

FIRST BANCORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

                            

The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) of First BanCorp. (the “Corporation”) have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read  in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2016, which are included in the Corporation’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

The results of operations for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. 

 

Adoption of new accounting requirements and recently issued but not yet effective accounting requirements

 

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued the following accounting pronouncements and guidance relevant to the Corporation’s operations:

 

In May 2014, the FASB updated the Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification” or the “ASC”) to create a new, principles-based revenue recognition framework. The Update is the culmination of efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to develop a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principal of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance describes a 5-step process that entities can apply to achieve the core principle of revenue recognition and requires disclosures sufficient to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers and the significant judgments used in determining that information. The new framework is effective for public business entities, with certain exceptions that are not SEC registrants provided recently by the SEC staff, for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those reporting periods, as a result of the FASB’s amendment to the standard to defer the effective date by one year.  Early adoption is permitted for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016.

 

  The Corporation plans to adopt the revenue recognition guidance on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method of adoption. The Corporation’s implementation efforts include the identification of revenue within the scope of the guidance, as well as the evaluation of revenue contracts and related accounting policies. Because the amended guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the Corporation’s has scoped out the majority of its revenue streams. While in scope of the new guidance, the Corporation does not expect a material change in the timing or measurement of revenues related to deposit fees. The Corporation has concluded that its credit cardholder fees and mortgage servicing fees standards are not subject to the new standard. Nonetheless, the Corporation continues to evaluate other revenue streams such as interchange fees, merchant fees and insurance commissions but does not expect material changes in the timing of when revenues are recognized upon the adoption of this standard.

 

In March 2016, the FASB updated the Codification to simplify certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The main provisions in this Update include: (i) recognition of all tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-base payment awards) as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement, (ii) classification of the excess tax benefit along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity, (iii) an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur, (iv) a threshold to qualify for equity classification that permits withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rate in the applicable jurisdictions, and (v) classification of cash paid by an employer as a financing activity when the payment results from the withholding of shares for tax withholding purposes. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Corporation adopted the provisions during the first quarter of 2017 without any material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In March 2016, the FASB updated the Codification to require an equity method investor to add the cost of acquiring an additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of

the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. Also, this Update requires that an entity that has an available-for sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the adoption of the equity method. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2017 did not have an impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

 

    In June 2016, the FASB updated the Codification to introduce new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments that includes an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. The Corporation has developed a transition roadmap in order to comply with the timely implementation of this new accounting framework. The Corporation has created a Working Group with members from multiple areas across the organization that is responsible for assessing the impact of the standard, evaluating interpretative issues, and evaluating the current credit loss models against the new guidance to determine any changes necessary and other related implementation activities. The Working Group provides periodic updates to the Corporation’s CECL Management Committee, which has oversight responsibilities for the implementation efforts.

 

   In October 2016, the FASB updated the Codification to modify the criteria used by a reporting entity when determining if it is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) when the entities are under common control and the reporting entity has indirect interests in the VIE through related parties. If the reporting entity meets the first criteria in that it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that are most significant to its economic performance, it is required to consider all interests held indirectly through related entities on a proportionate basis in determining if it meets the second criterion, that is, the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from it that are potentially significant to the VIE. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

 

     In March 2017, the FASB updated the Codification to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. With respect to securities held at a discount, the amendments do not require an accounting change; thus, the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. Under current GAAP, premiums and discounts on callable debt securities generally are amortized to the maturity date. An entity must have a large number of similar loans to consider estimates of future principal prepayments when applying the interest method. However, an entity that holds an individual callable debt security at a premium may not amortize that premium to the earliest call date. If that callable debt security is subsequently called, the entity records a loss equal to the unamortized premium. The amendments in this Update more closely align the amortization period of premiums and discounts to expectations incorporated in market pricing on the underlying securities. In most cases, market participants price securities to the call date that produces the worst yield when the coupon is above current market rates (that is, the security is trading at a premium) and price securities to maturity when the coupon is below market rates (that is, the security is trading at a discount) in anticipation that the borrower will act in its economic best interest. As a result, the amendments more closely align interest income recorded on bonds held at a premium or a discount with the economics of the underlying instrument. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s statement of financial condition or results of operations. As of September 30, 2017, the Corporation had $4.2 million of callable debt securities held at a premium (unamortized premium of $0.1 million).

 

   In May 2017, the FASB updated the codification to reduce the cost and complexity when applying ASC Topic 718 and standardize the practice of applying Topic 718 to financial reporting. Topic 718 prescribes the accounting treatment of a modification in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The guidance clarifies what changes would qualify as a modification. This was done by better defining what does not constitute a modification. In order for a change to a share-based arrangement to not require Topic 718 modification treatment, all of the following must be met: (i) the fair value (or alternative measurement method used) of the modified award equals the fair value (or alternative measurement method used) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified, (ii) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified, and (iii) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardless of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under this Update. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation’s Omnibus Plan provides for equity based compensation incentives through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards. If any change occurs in the future to awards issued under the Omnibus Plan, the Corporation will evaluate it under this guidance.

 

     In August 2017, the FASB updated the Codification to: (i) expand hedge accounting for nonfinancial and financial risk components and amend measurement methodologies to more closely align hedge accounting with a company’s risk management activities, (ii) decrease the complexity of preparing and understanding hedge results by eliminating the separate measurement and reporting of hedge ineffectiveness, (iii) enhance transparency, comparability, and understanding of hedge results through enhanced disclosures and changing the presentation of hedge results to align the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item, and (iv) reduce the cost and complexity of applying hedge accounting by simplifying the manner in which assessments of hedge effectiveness may be performed. This Update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires companies to apply requirements to existing hedging relationships on the date of adoption, and the effect of the adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. As of September 30, 2017, all of the derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated hedges. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s statement of financial condition or results of operations.

  

NOTE 2 – NATURAL DISASTERS AFFECTING FIRST BANCORP. IN THIRD QUARTER 2017

Two strong hurricanes affected the Corporation’s service areas during the third quarter of 2017.  Early in September, Hurricane Irma hit ground through the eastern Caribbean as a Category 5 storm affecting several islands, including the U.S. Virgin Islands of St. Thomas and St. John and Tortola in the British Virgin Islands, with lesser impacts on St. Croix and Puerto Rico. After hitting the eastern Caribbean, Hurricane Irma made landfall along Florida’s southwest shoreline.  Two weeks after Hurricane Irma sideswiped Puerto Rico, Hurricane Maria made landfall in the south east corner of Puerto Rico as a Category 4 storm and exited on the northern coast at a point between the cities of Arecibo and Barceloneta after battering other islands in the Caribbean, including the U.S. Virgin Island of St. Croix.  These storms caused, among other things, widespread property damage, flooding, power outages, and water and communication services interruptions, and severely disrupted normal economic activity in all of these regions. 

The following summarizes the more significant financial repercussions of these natural disasters for the Corporation and for its major subsidiary, FirstBank.

Credit Quality and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The Corporation established a $66.5 million allowance for loan and lease losses in the third quarter of 2017 directly related to the initial estimate, based on available information, of inherent losses resulting from the impact of the recent storms.  As the Corporation acquires additional information on overall economic prospects in the affected areas together with loan officers’ further assessments of the impact on individual borrowers, the loss estimate will be revised as needed, and these revisions could be material.  The Corporation’s approach to estimating the storms’ impact on credit quality is presented in Note 8 – “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses.”

 

Interruptions in regular collection efforts caused by Hurricanes Irma and Maria adversely affected the Corporation’s non-performing loan statistics.  Non-performing residential mortgage loans increased in the third quarter by $23.2 million to $178.5 million as of September 30, 2017 and non-performing consumer loans and finance leases increased in the third quarter by $5.4 million to $26.5 million as of September 30, 2017.  Refer to Note 7 – “Loans Held For Investment” for additional information about early delinquency statistics and payment deferral programs established by the Corporation to assist individuals affected by the recent storms.

 

Disaster Response Plan Costs, Casualty Losses and Related Insurance

The Corporation implemented its disaster response plan as these storms approached its service areas.  To operate in disaster response mode, the Corporation incurred expenses for, among other things, buying diesel and generators for electric power, debris removal, security matters, and emergency communications with customers regarding the status of Bank operations.  The disaster response plan costs, combined with payroll and rental costs during the idle time caused by the storms, totaled $2.9 million as of September 30, 2017, including $0.6 million in donations and other storm relief efforts and employee assistance. The Corporation will incur additional costs through the end of 2017 as the Corporation addresses ongoing operational issues.  The Corporation maintains insurance for its disaster response costs, as well as for certain revenue lost through business interruption. 

The Bank was able to resume operations in Puerto Rico within a week after Hurricane Maria made landfall, but with some limitations.  Certain of the Corporation’s facilities and their contents were damaged by these storms.  The Corporation has recognized asset impairments of approximately $0.6 million as of September 30, 2017, and the Corporation may identify additional impairments through the end of 2017. The Corporation maintains insurance policies for casualty losses that provide for replacement value coverage.     

Management believes, based on its understanding of the insurance coverages, that recovery of $2.9 million of the $3.5 million above-mentioned costs and asset impairments identified as of September 30, 2017 is probable.  Accordingly, a receivable of $2.9

million was included in “Other assets” as of September 30, 2017 for the expected recovery. The impairments, recoverable expenses and expected recoveries are included as part of “Other non-interest income” in the statement of (loss) income. Management also believes that there is a possibility that some gains will be recognized with respect to casualty and lost revenue claims in future periods, but this is contingent on reaching agreement on the Corporation’s claims with the insurance carriers.

 

NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares issued and outstanding. Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders represents net income (loss) adjusted for any preferred stock dividends, including any dividends declared, and any cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of the end of the period. Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding exclude unvested shares of restricted stock that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights.

    

    Potential dilutive common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options, unvested shares of restricted stock that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights, and outstanding warrants using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential dilutive common shares are issued and outstanding and the proceeds from the exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the numbers of potential dilutive shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options, unvested shares of restricted stock that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights, and outstanding warrants that result in lower potential dilutive shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. Warrants outstanding to purchase 1,285,899 shares of common stock and 1,815,904 unvested shares of restricted stock that do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 because the Corporation reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders and their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect. Stock options not included in the computation of outstanding shares because they were antidilutive amounted to 34,989 as of September 30, 2016.

NOTE 4 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

   As of January 21, 2007, the Corporation’s 1997 stock option plan expired and no additional awards could be granted under that plan. All outstanding awards granted under this plan continued in full force and effect since then, subject to their original terms. No awards of shares could be granted under the 1997 stock option plan as of its expiration. During the first quarter of 2017, all of the remaining outstanding awards granted under the 1997 stock option plan expired.

 

 

  On May 24, 2016, the Corporation’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the First BanCorp. Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Omnibus Plan”), to, among other things, increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Plan, extend the term of the Omnibus Plan to May 24, 2026 and re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under the Omnibus Plan for purposes of Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards. The Omnibus Plan authorizes the issuance of up to  14,169,807  shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganizations, and other similar events. As of September 30, 2017, 7,713,767 authorized shares of common stock were available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan. The Corporation’s Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the Corporation’s Compensation Committee, has the power and authority to determine those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any awards, subject to various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards.

   Under the Omnibus Plan, during the first nine months of 2017, the Corporation awarded to its independent directors 140,360 shares of restricted stock that are subject to a one-year vesting period. In addition, during the first nine months of 2017, the Corporation awarded 951,332 shares of restricted stock to employees subject to vesting periods that range from 1 to 2 years. Included in those 951,332 shares of restricted stock were 838,332 shares granted in the first quarter of 2017 to certain senior officers consistent with the requirements of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Interim Final Rule, which permit TARP recipients to grant “long-term restricted stock” without violating the prohibition on paying or accruing a bonus payment, subject to limits on value and certain vesting and non-transferability requirements. On May 10, 2017, the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) announced that it had sold all of its remaining 10,291,553 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. As a result of the U.S. Treasury’s sale, the Corporation is no longer subject to the compensation-related restrictions under TARP, which substantially limited the Corporation’s ability to award short-term and long-term incentives to the Corporation’s executives, and the Corporation’s senior officers are no longer subject to the transferability restrictions on their shares of restricted stock. However, since the U.S. Treasury did not recover the full amount of its original investment under TARP, the senior officers forfeited 2,370,571 of their outstanding shares of restricted stock, resulting in a reduction in the number of common shares outstanding. The U.S. Treasury continues to hold a warrant to purchase 1,285,899 shares of the Corporation’s common stock.

 

The Corporation accounted for the restricted stock that it granted in 2017 prior to the U.S. Treasury’s sale of its shares at a discount from the market price of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock on the date of the grant. For the 838,332 shares of restricted stock granted subject to the TARP requirements, the market price was discounted assuming that 50% of the shares of restricted stock would become freely transferable and the remaining 50% would be forfeited, resulting in a fair value of $2.71 for each share of restricted stock granted under TARP requirements. Since the assumption was correct, the forfeiture resulting from the U.S. Treasury’s sale did not have an impact on the Corporation’s operating results. Also, the Corporation used empirical data to estimate employee terminations; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior were considered separately for valuation purposes.

 

   For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, the Corporation recognized $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock awards, compared to $1.0 million and $2.9 million for the same periods in 2016, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, there was $4.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested shares of restricted stock. The weighted average period over which the Corporation expects to recognize such cost is 1.2 years.

 

   During the first nine months of 2016, 130,873 shares of restricted stock were awarded to the Corporation’s independent directors subject to a one-year vesting period. Also, during the first nine months of 2016, the Corporation awarded 1,794,702 shares of restricted stock to employees subject to vesting periods that range from 2 to 3 years. Included in those 1,794,702 shares of restricted stock were 1,546,137 shares granted to certain senior officers consistent with the requirements of TARP. As explained above, the Corporation is no longer subject to the compensation-related restrictions under TARP as a result of the U.S. Treasury’s sale of its remaining shares of the Corporation’s common stock.

 

    The fair value of the shares of restricted stock granted in the first nine months of 2016 was based on the market price of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock on the date of the grant. For the 1,546,137 shares of restricted stock granted under the TARP requirements, the market price was discounted due to the post-vesting restrictions. For purposes of determining the awards’ fair value, the Corporation assumed that 50% of the shares of restricted stock would become freely transferable and the remaining 50% will be forfeited, resulting in a fair value of $1.43 for restricted shares granted under the TARP requirements.

 

   Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the Corporation to reverse compensation expense for any awards that are forfeited due to employee or director turnover. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on share-based compensation, as the effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed.  If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a decrease in the expense recognized in the financial statements.  If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, an adjustment is made to decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase in the expense recognized in the financial statements. The estimated forfeiture rate did not change as a result of the restricted shares forfeited in connection with the aforementioned U.S. Treasury’s sale of the Corporation’s common stock. Approximately $48 thousand of compensation expense was reversed during 2017 related to forfeitures upon resignation of two of the Corporation’s independent directors.

 

   Also, under the Omnibus Plan, effective April 1, 2013, the Corporation’s Board of Directors determined to increase the salary amounts paid to certain executive officers primarily by paying the increased salary amounts in the form of shares of the Corporation’s common stock, instead of cash. During the first nine months of 2017, the Corporation issued 427,940 shares of common stock (first nine months of 2016 – 629,476 shares) with a weighted average market value of $5.88 (first nine months of 2016 – $3.60) as salary stock compensation. This resulted in a compensation expense of $2.5 million recorded in the first nine months of 2017 (first nine months of 2016 – $2.2 million). 

 

For the first nine months of 2017, the Corporation withheld 143,509 shares (first nine months of 2016 – 189,604 shares) from the common stock paid to certain senior officers as additional compensation and 243,102 shares of restricted stock that vested during the first nine months of 2017 (first nine months of 2016 – 65,498) to cover employees’ payroll and income tax withholding liabilities; these shares are held as treasury shares. The Corporation paid any fractional share of salary stock that the officer was entitled to in cash. In the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation treats shares withheld for tax purposes as common stock repurchases.

 

    On June 29, 2017, upon the recommendation of the Corporation’s Compensation and Benefits Committee, the Corporation’s Board of Directors approved a new executive compensation program that, as of July 1, 2017, applies to the Corporation’s executive officers