FIRST COMMUNITY BANKSHARES INC /VA/ - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended June 30, 2006
Commission file number 000-19297
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 55-0694814 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation) | ||
P.O. Box 989 | ||
Bluefield, Virginia | 24605-0989 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(276) 326-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value; 11,164,774 shares outstanding as of July 31, 2006
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2006
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2006
INDEX
- 2 -
Table of Contents
PART I.
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Data) | (Unaudited) | (Note 1) | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 43,620 | $ | 46,872 | ||||
Interest-bearing balances with banks |
29,714 | 10,667 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
73,334 | 57,539 | ||||||
Securities available for sale (amortized cost of $412,660 at
June 30, 2006; $405,667 at December 31, 2005) |
405,761 | 404,381 | ||||||
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $21,057 at
June 30, 2006; $24,877 at December 31, 2005) |
20,641 | 24,173 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,293 | 1,274 | ||||||
Loans held for investment, net of unearned income |
1,318,943 | 1,331,039 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
14,710 | 14,736 | ||||||
Net loans held for investment |
1,304,233 | 1,316,303 | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
35,888 | 34,993 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
910 | 1,400 | ||||||
Interest receivable |
10,179 | 10,232 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
60,883 | 61,119 | ||||||
Other assets |
66,510 | 41,069 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 1,979,632 | $ | 1,952,483 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing |
$ | 253,664 | $ | 230,542 | ||||
Interest-bearing |
1,159,462 | 1,175,402 | ||||||
Total Deposits |
1,413,126 | 1,405,944 | ||||||
Interest, taxes and other liabilities |
14,938 | 16,153 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
| 82,500 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
149,507 | 124,154 | ||||||
FHLB borrowings and other indebtedness |
204,158 | 129,231 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
1,781,729 | 1,757,982 | ||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value undesignated; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 11,499,018 and
11,496,312 shares issued at June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005,
including 322,563 and 244,509 shares in treasury, respectively |
11,499 | 11,496 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
108,602 | 108,573 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
91,136 | 82,828 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost |
(10,097 | ) | (7,625 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(3,237 | ) | (771 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
197,903 | 194,501 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
$ | 1,979,632 | $ | 1,952,483 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Interest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans held for investment |
$ | 24,506 | $ | 22,192 | $ | 48,431 | $ | 42,920 | ||||||||
Interest on securities-taxable |
3,224 | 2,555 | 6,101 | 4,851 | ||||||||||||
Interest on securities-nontaxable |
1,816 | 1,865 | 3,642 | 3,814 | ||||||||||||
Interest on deposits in banks |
479 | 178 | 774 | 393 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
30,025 | 26,790 | 58,948 | 51,978 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
8,326 | 5,547 | 15,973 | 10,509 | ||||||||||||
Interest on borrowings |
3,526 | 2,721 | 6,737 | 5,194 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
11,852 | 8,268 | 22,710 | 15,703 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
18,173 | 18,522 | 36,238 | 36,275 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
811 | 1,073 | 1,219 | 1,764 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
17,362 | 17,449 | 35,019 | 34,511 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Wealth management income |
732 | 793 | 1,415 | 1,482 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
2,655 | 2,623 | 5,072 | 4,771 | ||||||||||||
Other service charges, commissions and fees |
711 | 671 | 1,451 | 1,330 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of securities |
(94 | ) | 121 | 66 | 143 | |||||||||||
Other operating income |
1,516 | 362 | 2,664 | 566 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
5,520 | 4,570 | 10,668 | 8,292 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
6,782 | 7,452 | 14,683 | 14,770 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy expense of bank premises |
1,011 | 968 | 2,051 | 1,911 | ||||||||||||
Furniture and equipment expense |
858 | 813 | 1,708 | 1,597 | ||||||||||||
Core deposit amortization |
144 | 111 | 234 | 221 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expense |
3,793 | 3,957 | 7,245 | 7,298 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
12,588 | 13,301 | 25,921 | 25,797 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
10,294 | 8,718 | 19,766 | 17,006 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
3,002 | 2,494 | 5,630 | 4,731 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
7,292 | 6,224 | 14,136 | 12,275 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax |
| (39 | ) | | (170 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit |
| (15 | ) | | (66 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
| (24 | ) | | (104 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,292 | $ | 6,200 | $ | 14,136 | $ | 12,171 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.26 | $ | 1.08 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.07 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share continuing operations |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.26 | $ | 1.09 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share continuing operations |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.08 | ||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.255 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.51 | ||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding |
11,201,052 | 11,273,724 | 11,216,940 | 11,266,648 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
11,258,581 | 11,344,480 | 11,277,032 | 11,341,847 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Operating activities continuing operations: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 14,136 | $ | 12,275 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,219 | 1,764 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
1,709 | 1,628 | ||||||
Core deposit amortization |
234 | 221 | ||||||
Net investment amortization and accretion |
303 | 781 | ||||||
Net (gain) loss on the sale of assets |
(785 | ) | 14 | |||||
Mortgage loans originated for sale |
(13,332 | ) | (15,956 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans |
13,372 | 16,138 | ||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
(59 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
60 | (379 | ) | |||||
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable |
43 | (922 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
(105 | ) | | |||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
2,508 | (4,082 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities |
(1,206 | ) | 600 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities continuing operations |
18,097 | 12,019 | ||||||
Investing activities continuing operations: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
1,824 | 16,707 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale |
12,807 | 24,410 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held to maturity |
3,574 | 4,377 | ||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(20,379 | ) | (35,218 | ) | ||||
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance |
(25,000 | ) | | |||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans held for investment |
9,514 | (59,276 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in branch divestiture |
(13,721 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(3,237 | ) | (1,577 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
298 | 760 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities continuing operations |
(34,320 | ) | (49,817 | ) | ||||
Financing activities continuing operations: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in demand and savings deposits |
13,344 | (21,242 | ) | |||||
Net increase in time deposits |
10,141 | 60,077 | ||||||
Net decrease in federal funds purchased |
(82,500 | ) | (32,500 | ) | ||||
Net increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
25,632 | 15,428 | ||||||
Net proceeds from and repayments of FHLB and other borrowings |
74,927 | 74,912 | ||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
322 | 255 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
105 | | ||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
(4,125 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(5,828 | ) | (5,746 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities continuing operations |
32,018 | 91,059 | ||||||
Cash flows of discontinued operations: (Revised See Note 2) |
||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
| (104 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
| | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| | ||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
| (104 | ) | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
15,795 | 53,157 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
57,539 | 54,746 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 73,334 | $ | 107,903 | ||||
Supplemental information Noncash items |
||||||||
Transfer of loans to other real estate |
$ | 490 | $ | 196 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Information) (Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Earnings | Stock | (Loss) Income | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2005 |
$ | 11,472 | $ | 108,263 | $ | 68,019 | $ | (6,881 | ) | $ | 2,360 | $ | 183,233 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 12,171 | | | 12,171 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities
available for sale |
| | | | (276 | ) | (276 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net income |
| | | | (78 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 12,171 | | (354 | ) | 11,817 | |||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared |
| | (5,746 | ) | | | (5,746 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of 4,426 treasury shares |
| | | (125 | ) | | (125 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of Stone Capital
2,447 shares issued |
2 | 85 | | | | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock awards 1,500 shares issued |
2 | 18 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise stock options |
| 180 | | | | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||
Option exercise 23,876 shares |
20 | 93 | | 142 | | 255 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2005 |
$ | 11,496 | $ | 108,639 | $ | 74,444 | $ | (6,864 | ) | $ | 2,006 | $ | 189,721 | |||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2006 |
$ | 11,496 | $ | 108,573 | $ | 82,828 | $ | (7,625 | ) | $ | (771 | ) | $ | 194,501 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 14,136 | | | 14,136 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities
available for sale |
| | | | (3,352 | ) | (3,352 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net income |
| | | | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on
derivative securities |
| | | | 902 | 902 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 14,136 | | (2,466 | ) | 11,670 | |||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared |
| | (5,828 | ) | | | (5,828 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of 130,861 treasury shares |
| | | (4,125 | ) | | (4,125 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of Stone Capital
2,706 shares issued |
3 | 85 | | | | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock awards 5,132 shares |
| (36 | ) | | 160 | | 124 | |||||||||||||||||
ESOP allocation 27,733 shares |
16 | 867 | 883 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense |
| 140 | | | | 140 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise stock options |
| 139 | | | | 139 | ||||||||||||||||||
Option exercises 19,942 shares |
| (315 | ) | | 626 | | 311 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2006 |
$ | 11,499 | $ | 108,602 | $ | 91,136 | $ | (10,097 | ) | $ | (3,237 | ) | $ | 197,903 | ||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. General
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of First Community
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (First Community or the Company) have been prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments including normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair
presentation, have been made. These results are not necessarily indicative of the results of
consolidated operations that might be expected for the full calendar year.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, has been derived from the audited financial
statements included in the Companys 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been omitted in
accordance with standards for the preparation of interim consolidated financial statements. These
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the 2005 Annual Report of First Community on Form 10-K.
A more complete and detailed description of First Communitys significant accounting policies is
included within Footnote 1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2005.
Further discussion of the Companys application of critical accounting policies is included within
the Application of Critical Accounting Policies section of Part I, Item 2, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included herein.
The Company operates within one business segment, community banking.
The cash flows resulting from discontinued operations have been revised to conform to the current
years presentation, which details cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), an interpretation of Statement No. 109
Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 provides guidance for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. FIN 48 also
requires additional disclosures related to an entitys accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN
48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements, and is not yet in a
position to determine the impact of the interpretation.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets,
which amends FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The Statement permits an entity to measure servicing assets
or servicing liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in fair value in
earnings in the period in which the change occurs. The Statement is effective as of an entitys
first fiscal year beginning after September 15, 2006. However, earlier adoption of the Statement
is permitted as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued
financial statements for any interim period of that fiscal year. The adoption of this standard is
not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, the results of
operations, or liquidity.
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement amends FASB
Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to require
evaluation of all interests in securitized financial assets under Statement No. 133, eliminating a
long-standing (but always intended to be temporary) exemption from Statement No. 133 for such
financial instruments. As a result of the Statement, entities will have to determine if such
interests may be (1) freestanding derivatives, (2) hybrid financial instruments containing embedded
derivatives requiring bifurcation, or (3) hybrid financial instruments containing embedded
derivatives that do not require bifurcation. In addition, the Statement permits fair value
remeasurement for any hybrid instrument that contains an embedded derivative that would otherwise
have to be bifurcated.
- 7 -
Table of Contents
The Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a
remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year beginning after
September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of the Statement is permitted as of the beginning of an
entitys fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued financial statements for any interim
period of that fiscal year. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material
impact on the Companys financial condition, the results of operations, or liquidity.
Note 2. Discontinued Operations
In August 2004, the Company sold its mortgage banking subsidiary. The transaction completed the
Companys exit from the mortgage banking business segment.
The business related to the former mortgage banking subsidiary is accounted for as discontinued
operations and, therefore, the results of operations and cash flows have been removed from the
Companys results of continuing operations in accordance with SFAS 144 for all periods presented in
this report. Results of the former mortgage subsidiary are presented as discontinued operations in
a separate category on the income statement relating to the 2005 period following results from
continuing operations. The results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005, are presented below. The Company had no related income or loss from discontinued
operations in 2006.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | ||||||
Interest Income |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Interest Expense |
| | ||||||
Net interest income |
| | ||||||
Other Income |
| | ||||||
Other Expense |
39 | 170 | ||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(39 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||
Applicable income tax benefit |
(15 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||
Net Loss |
$ | (24 | ) | $ | (104 | ) | ||
All assets and liabilities of the mortgage banking subsidiary were disposed of in the third quarter
of 2004. Accordingly, there were no assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations
included in the June 30, 2006, or the December 31, 2005, consolidated balance sheets.
The cash flows resulting from discontinued operations have been revised to conform to the current
years presentation, which details cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities.
Note 3. Mergers, Acquisitions and Branch Development
In June 2006, the Company sold its Drakes Branch, Virginia, location. At the time of the sale, the
branch had deposits and repurchase agreements totaling approximately $16.4 million and loans of
approximately $1.9 million. The transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $702
thousand.
In March 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its branch location in
Rowlesburg, West Virginia. The branch had deposits and repurchase agreements totaling
approximately $10.7 million and loans of approximately $3.2 million at December 31, 2005. The
transaction is expected to result in a pre-tax gain of approximately $382 thousand, and is expected
to be completed by December 31, 2006.
- 8 -
Table of Contents
Note 4. Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of
available for sale securities are as follows:
June 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities |
$ | 92,717 | $ | | $ | (3,360 | ) | $ | 89,357 | |||||||
States and political subdivisions |
147,678 | 1,479 | (2,789 | ) | 146,368 | |||||||||||
Corporate notes |
61,520 | 254 | (251 | ) | 61,523 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
103,905 | 67 | (3,432 | ) | 100,540 | |||||||||||
Equities |
6,840 | 1,272 | (139 | ) | 7,973 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 412,660 | $ | 3,072 | $ | (9,971 | ) | $ | 405,761 | |||||||
December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities |
$ | 92,739 | $ | | $ | (1,315 | ) | $ | 91,424 | |||||||
States and political subdivisions |
151,118 | 2,426 | (1,376 | ) | 152,168 | |||||||||||
Corporate notes |
61,466 | 125 | (317 | ) | 61,274 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
94,954 | 155 | (2,115 | ) | 92,994 | |||||||||||
Equities |
5,390 | 1,282 | (151 | ) | 6,521 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 405,667 | $ | 3,988 | $ | (5,274 | ) | $ | 404,381 | |||||||
As of June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of held to
maturity securities are as follows:
June 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 20,255 | $ | 425 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 20,672 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
11 | | | 11 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
375 | | (1 | ) | 374 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,641 | $ | 425 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 21,057 | |||||||
December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 23,781 | $ | 706 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 24,486 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
17 | | | 17 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
375 | | (1 | ) | 374 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24,173 | $ | 706 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 24,877 | |||||||
Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2006, represents
other-than-temporary impairment. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities
until such time as the value recovers or the securities mature. Furthermore, the Company believes
the declines in value are attributable to changes in market interest rates and not the credit
quality of the issuer.
- 9 -
Table of Contents
The following table reflects those investments in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2006, and
December 31, 2005. There were no securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more
months for which the Company does not have the ability to hold until the security matures or
recovers in value.
June 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
U. S. Government agency securities |
$ | 59,440 | $ | (1,858 | ) | $ | 29,918 | $ | (1,502 | ) | $ | 89,358 | $ | (3,360 | ) | |||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
54,933 | (1,562 | ) | 26,877 | (1,235 | ) | 81,810 | (2,797 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other securities |
32,629 | (252 | ) | | | 32,629 | (252 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
29,374 | (393 | ) | 66,621 | (3,039 | ) | 95,995 | (3,432 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
2,322 | (137 | ) | 14 | (2 | ) | 2,336 | (139 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 178,698 | $ | (4,202 | ) | $ | 123,430 | $ | (5,778 | ) | $ | 302,128 | $ | (9,980 | ) | |||||||||
December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
U. S. Government agency securities |
$ | 61,469 | $ | (722 | ) | $ | 29,851 | $ | (593 | ) | $ | 91,320 | $ | (1,315 | ) | |||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
47,706 | (830 | ) | 18,583 | (547 | ) | 66,289 | (1,377 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other securities |
41,523 | (318 | ) | | | 41,523 | (318 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
40,651 | (952 | ) | 45,607 | (1,163 | ) | 86,258 | (2,115 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
1,786 | (129 | ) | 99 | (22 | ) | 1,885 | (151 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 193,135 | $ | (2,951 | ) | $ | 94,140 | $ | (2,325 | ) | $ | 287,275 | $ | (5,276 | ) | |||||||||
Note 5. Loans
Loans, net of unearned income, consist of the following:
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Loans held for investment: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and agricultural |
$ | 108,749 | 8.25 | % | $ | 110,211 | 8.28 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
434,161 | 32.92 | % | 464,510 | 34.90 | % | ||||||||||
Residential real estate |
514,019 | 38.97 | % | 504,386 | 37.89 | % | ||||||||||
Construction |
160,685 | 12.18 | % | 143,976 | 10.82 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
99,018 | 7.51 | % | 106,148 | 7.97 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
2,311 | 0.17 | % | 1,808 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,318,943 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,331,039 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 1,293 | $ | 1,274 | ||||||||||||
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk beyond the
amount recognized on the balance sheet. The contractual amounts of those instruments reflect the
extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. The
Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses
the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance sheet instruments.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is not a
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by the Company, upon extension of credit is based on managements credit evaluation of the
counterparties. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property,
plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit and written financial guarantees are conditional commitments issued by
the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved
in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities
to customers. To the extent deemed necessary, collateral of varying types and amounts is held to
secure customer performance under certain of those letters of credit outstanding.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk at June 30, 2006, are
commitments to extend credit (including availability of lines of credit) of $201.3 million and
standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written of $4.9 million.
Note 6. Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to absorb probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by charges to earnings in the form of
provision for loan losses and recoveries of prior loan charge-offs, and decreased by loans charged
off. The provision is calculated to bring the allowance to a level which, according to a
systematic process of measurement, reflects the amount management estimates is needed to absorb
probable losses within the portfolio.
Management performs periodic assessments to determine the appropriate level of allowance.
Differences between actual loan loss experience and estimates are reflected through adjustments
that are made by either increasing or decreasing the loss provision based upon current measurement
criteria. Commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios are evaluated separately for purposes
of determining the allowance. The specific components of the allowance include allocations to
individual commercial credits and allocations to the remaining non-homogeneous and homogeneous
pools of loans. Managements allocations are based on judgment of qualitative and quantitative
factors about both macro and micro economic conditions reflected within the portfolio of loans and
the economy as a whole. Factors considered in this evaluation include, but are not necessarily
limited to, probable losses from loan and other credit arrangements, general economic conditions,
changes in credit concentrations or pledged collateral, historical loan loss experience, and trends
in portfolio volume, maturities, composition, delinquencies, and non-accruals. While management
has allocated the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments, the entire allowance is
available for use against any type of loan loss deemed appropriate by management.
The following table details the Companys allowance for loan loss activity for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 14,797 | $ | 16,543 | $ | 14,736 | $ | 16,339 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
811 | 1,073 | 1,219 | 1,764 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(1,389 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (2,104 | ) | (2,482 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
491 | 398 | 859 | 755 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification of allowance for
lending-related commitments |
| (392 | ) | | (392 | ) | ||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 14,710 | $ | 15,984 | $ | 14,710 | $ | 15,984 | ||||||||
- 11 -
Table of Contents
Note 7. Deposits
The following is a summary of interest-bearing deposits by type as of June 30, 2006, and December
31, 2005.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 139,861 | $ | 144,314 | ||||
Savings deposits |
344,436 | 355,184 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
675,165 | 675,904 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,159,462 | $ | 1,175,402 | ||||
Note 8. Borrowings
The following schedule details the Companys Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings and other
indebtedness at June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | 188,694 | $ | 113,767 | ||||
Subordinated debt |
15,464 | 15,464 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 204,158 | $ | 129,231 | ||||
FHLB borrowings include $182.3 million in convertible and callable advances and $6.4 million of
noncallable term advances from the FHLB of Atlanta at June 30, 2006. The weighted average interest
rates of advances are 4.46% and 4.17% at June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively.
In January 2006, the Company entered into a derivative swap instrument where it receives
LIBOR-based variable interest payments and pays fixed interest payments. The notional amount of
the derivative swap is $50 million and effectively fixes a portion of the FHLB borrowings at
approximately 4.34%. After considering the effect of the interest rate swap, the effective
weighted average interest rate of the FHLB borrowings is 4.27% at June 30, 2006.
At June 30, 2006, the FHLB advances have maturities between six months and 15 years. The scheduled
maturities of the advances are as follows:
Amount | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
2006 |
$ | 365 | ||
2007 |
6,250 | |||
2008 |
| |||
2009 |
| |||
2010 |
25,000 | |||
2011 and thereafter |
157,079 | |||
Total |
$ | 188,694 | ||
The callable advances may be redeemed at quarterly intervals after various lockout periods. These
call options may substantially shorten the lives of these instruments. If these advances are
called, the debt may be paid in full, converted to another FHLB credit product, or converted to a
fixed or adjustable rate advance. Prepayment of the advances may result in substantial penalties
based upon the differential between contractual note rates and current advance rates for similar
maturities. Advances from the FHLB are secured by stock in the FHLB of Atlanta, qualifying first
mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and certain other securities.
Also included in borrowings is $15.5 million of junior subordinated debentures (the Debentures)
issued by the Company in October 2003 to an unconsolidated trust subsidiary, FCBI Capital Trust
(the Trust) with an interest rate of three-month
- 12 -
Table of Contents
LIBOR plus 2.95%. The Trust was able to purchase the Debentures through the issuance of trust preferred securities which had substantially
identical terms as the Debentures. The Debentures mature on October 8, 2033, and are callable
beginning October 8, 2008. The net proceeds from the offering were contributed as capital to the
Companys subsidiary bank to support further growth.
The Company has committed to irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee the following payments or
distributions with respect to the preferred securities to the holders thereof to the extent that
the Trust has not made such payments or distributions: (i) accrued and unpaid distributions, (ii)
the redemption price, and (iii) upon a dissolution or termination of the trust, the lesser of the
liquidation amount and all accrued and unpaid distributions and the amount of assets of the trust
remaining available for distribution, in each case to the extent the Trust has funds available.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is a defendant in various legal actions and asserted
claims, most of which involve lending, collection and employment matters. While the Company and
its legal counsel are unable to assess the ultimate outcome of each of these matters with
certainty, the resolution of these actions, singly or in the aggregate, should not have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Note 10. Equity-Based Compensation
The Company maintains share-based compensation plans to encourage and facilitate investment in the
common stock of the Company by key executives and to assist in the long-term retention of service
by those executives. The Company has made stock option awards to officers and directors under a
total of four stock-based compensation plans. Non-qualified and incentive stock options, as well
as restricted and unrestricted stock may continue to be awarded under the 2004 Omnibus Stock Option
Plan. Vesting under the 2004 plan is generally over a three-year period.
The Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), on January 1,
2006, using the modified prospective method. Under this method, awards that are granted,
modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are measured and accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 123R. Also under this method, expense is recognized for unvested awards that were granted
prior to January 1, 2006, based upon the fair value determined at the grant date under FASB
Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R, the Company accounted for stock compensation under the intrinsic value method permitted
by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and
related interpretations. Accordingly, the Company previously recognized no compensation cost for
employee stock options that were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant.
- 13 -
Table of Contents
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 in 2005.
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | ||||||
Net income as reported |
$ | 6,200 | $ | 12,171 | ||||
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(47 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 6,153 | $ | 12,080 | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 6,224 | $ | 12,275 | ||||
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(47 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||
Pro forma income from continuing operations |
$ | 6,177 | $ | 12,184 | ||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 1.07 | ||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 1.07 | ||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 1.07 | ||||
Earnings per share from continuing operations: |
||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 1.09 | ||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.55 | $ | 1.08 | ||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 1.07 |
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting
from the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock as operating cash flows in
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R requires the cash flows from the tax benefits
resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation expense recognized for those options
and restricted stock (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. An excess
tax benefit totaling $105 thousand is classified as a financing cash inflow for the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, pre-tax income and net income for the three months ended June
30, 2006, are approximately $69 thousand and $41 thousand lower, respectively, than accounting for
stock options under the intrinsic value method. Pre-tax income and net income for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, are approximately $140 thousand and $84 thousand lower, respectively. The
increased compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS 123R had no effect on basic or
diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 3006.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized pre-tax compensation
expense related to total equity-based compensation of approximately $95 thousand and $283 thousand,
respectively.
As of June 30, 2006, there was approximately $585 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.4 years. The actual compensation cost recognized will differ from this estimate due to
a number of items, including new awards granted and changes in estimated forfeitures.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
A summary of the Companys stock option activity, and related information for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, is as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Option | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
383,562 | $ | 22.08 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
1,000 | 31.06 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(19,942 | ) | 16.15 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(3,182 | ) | 27.47 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
361,438 | $ | 22.39 | 11.8 | $ | 3,833 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
248,721 | $ | 21.48 | 10.8 | $ | 2,862 | ||||||||||
The fair value of options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model and certain assumptions. The fair values of grants made in the six month periods ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, were estimated using the following weighted average assumptions:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Volatility |
28.50 | % | 28.62 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
3.35 | % | 3.59 | % | ||||
Expected term (years) |
6.00 | 6.00 | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
4.69 | % | 3.80 | % |
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, was $7.57 and $6.71, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options
exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was approximately $348 thousand and
$58 thousand, respectively.
Stock Awards
The 2004 Omnibus Stock Option Plan permits the granting of restricted and unrestricted stock grants
either alone, in addition to, or in tandem with other awards made by the Company. Stock grants are
generally measured at fair value on the date of grant based on the number of shares granted and the
quoted price of the Companys stock. Such value is recognized as expense over the corresponding
service period. Compensation costs related to these types of awards are consistently reported for
all periods presented.
- 15 -
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the status of the Companys nonvested shares as of June 30, 2006,
and changes during the six months then ended.
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Nonvested | Grant-Date | |||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
4,000 | $ | 26.24 | |||||
Granted |
4,532 | 31.39 | ||||||
Vested |
(5,132 | ) | 29.67 | |||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
3,400 | $ | 27.93 | |||||
- 16 -
Table of Contents
PART I.
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis is provided to address information about First Community
Bancshares, Inc.s (the Company) financial condition and results of operations. This discussion
and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K and
the other financial information included in this report.
The Company is a multi-state bank holding company headquartered in Bluefield, Virginia, with total
assets of $1.98 billion at June 30, 2006. Through its community bank subsidiary, First Community
Bank, N. A. (the Bank), the Company provides financial, trust and investment advisory services to
individuals and commercial customers through fifty-nine banking locations and six wealth management
offices located in the four states of Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and Tennessee. The
Bank is the parent of Stone Capital Management, a SEC-registered investment advisory firm that
offers wealth management and investment advice. The Companys common stock is traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol FCBC.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including
statements contained in its filings with the SEC (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
the Exhibits hereto and thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications which
are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to the Companys
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, anticipations, estimates and
intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based
on various factors (many of which are beyond the Companys control). The words may, could,
should, would, believe, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, plan and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following factors, among
others, could cause the Companys financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in
such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the
strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and
changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; inflation, interest rate, market and monetary
fluctuations; the timely development of competitive new products and services of the Company and
the acceptance of these products and services by new and existing customers; the willingness of
customers to substitute competitors products and services for the Companys products and services
and vice versa; the impact of changes in financial services laws and regulations (including laws
concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes; the effect of
acquisitions, including, without limitation, the failure to achieve the expected revenue growth
and/or expense savings from such acquisitions; the growth and profitability of the Companys
non-interest or fee income being less than expected; unanticipated regulatory or judicial
proceedings; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at
managing the risks involved in the foregoing.
The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company
does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be
made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and conform to general practices within the banking
industry. The Companys financial position and results of operations are affected by managements
application of accounting policies, including judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues, expenses and related disclosures.
Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the
Companys consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.
Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary principally when assets and liabilities are
required to be recorded at estimated fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset carried on
the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded based upon the probability of
occurrence of a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in
more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation
adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are
provided by third party sources, when available. When third party information is not available,
valuation adjustments are estimated by management primarily through the use of internal modeling
techniques and appraisal estimates.
- 17 -
Table of Contents
The Companys accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation. The disclosures presented in the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and in Managements Discussion and Analysis provide
information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and
how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of
financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts,
management has identified i.) the determination of the allowance for loan losses, ii.) accounting
for acquisitions and intangible assets, and iii.) accounting for income taxes as the accounting
areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments. The identified critical accounting
policies are described in detail in the Companys 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been
no material changes in the Companys critical accounting policies since December 31, 2005.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
The Company is a full service commercial bank holding company which operates within the four-state
region of Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. The Company operates through the
Bank, and offers a wide range of financial services. The Company reported total assets of $1.98
billion at June 30, 2006, and operates through fifty-nine banking offices and six wealth management
offices.
The Company funds its lending activities primarily through the retail deposit operations of its
branch banking network. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) provide additional
funding as needed. The Company invests its funds primarily in loans to retail and commercial
customers. In addition to loans, the Company also invests a portion of its funds in various debt
securities, including those of United States agencies, state and political subdivisions, and
certain corporate notes and debt instruments. The Company also maintains overnight
interest-bearing balances with the FHLB and correspondent banks. The difference between interest
earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities is the Companys primary source of earnings. In
August 2004, the Company divested itself of its mortgage subsidiary.
RECENT ACQUISITIONS AND BRANCHING ACTIVITY
In June 2006, the Company sold its Drakes Branch, Virginia, branch office. At the time of the
sale, the branch had deposits and repurchase agreements totaling approximately $16.4 million and
loans of approximately $1.9 million. The transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $702
thousand.
In March 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its branch office in
Rowlesburg, West Virginia. The branch had deposits and repurchase agreements totaling
approximately $10.7 million and loans of approximately $3.2 million at December 31, 2005. The
transaction is expected to result in a gain of approximately $382 thousand, and is expected to be
completed by December 31, 2006.
The two transactions are a result of the Companys current strategic review of its branch network,
and the resources will be re-deployed in markets which offer improved growth and development
opportunities.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006, was $7.3 million or $0.65 per basic and
diluted share, compared with $6.2 million or $0.55 per basic and diluted share for the three months
ended June 30, 2005. Return on average equity for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was 14.74%
compared to 13.19% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Return on average assets was 1.47%
for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 1.31% for the three months ended June 30,
2005.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006, was $14.1 million or $1.26 per basic and $1.25
per diluted share, compared with $12.2 million or $1.08 per basic and $1.07 per diluted share for
the six months ended June 30, 2005. Return on average equity for the six months ended June 30,
2006 was 14.42% compared to 13.09% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Return on average
assets was 1.45% for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 1.31% for the six months ended
June 30, 2005.
- 18 -
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income Quarterly Comparison (See Table I)
Net interest income, the largest contributor to earnings, was $18.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2006, compared to $18.5 million for the corresponding period in 2005.
Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $19.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
a decrease of $374 thousand from $19.5 million for the second three months of 2005. The decrease
was due partly to increases in rates paid on liabilities which outpaced increases in the rates
earned on assets. The Company also acquired $25 million of bank-owned life insurance (BOLI),
which shifted that amount from earning assets to other assets and the related income from interest
income to other income.
Compared to the second three months of 2005, average earning assets increased $58.1 million while
interest-bearing liabilities increased $69.8 million during the second three months of 2006. The
yield on average earning assets increased 51 basis points to 6.92% from 6.41%. Total cost of
interest-bearing liabilities increased 83 basis points during the same period, which resulted in a
net interest rate spread (the difference between interest income on earning assets and expense on
interest bearing liabilities) that was 32 basis points lower at 3.82% compared to 4.14% for the
same period last year. The Companys tax-equivalent net interest margin of 4.28% for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, decreased 23 basis points from 4.51% in 2005.
The largest contributor to the increase in the yield on average earning assets in 2006 was the
increase in the rate earned on the loan portfolio. The increase in the rate to 7.40% from 6.85%,
attributable to the general rise in market rates of interest, resulted in a $1.8 million increase
in tax-equivalent interest income compared to the second quarter of 2005. The increase in the loan
portfolio contributed approximately $521 thousand to the change in interest income. The volume of
variable rate loans tied to prime and other indices increased in response to the recent increases
in short-term interest rates.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the tax-equivalent yield on securities available for
sale increased 53 basis points to 5.52%, while the average balance increased by $20.1 million. The
average tax-equivalent yield increased due to the addition of higher rate securities and the
reduction of lower rate securities.
Compared to the second three months of 2005, average interest-bearing balances with banks increased
to $41.4 million during the second three months of 2006, as the yield increased 158 basis points to
4.65%.
Compared to the same period in 2005, the average balances of interest-bearing demand and savings
deposits decreased $7.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30,
2006. The average rate paid on interest-bearing demand deposits increased by 5 basis points, while
the average rate paid on savings increased 106 basis points. Average time deposits increased $24.0
million while the average rate paid increased 98 basis points from 2.79% in 2005 to 3.77% in 2006.
The level of average non-interestbearing demand deposits increased $12.0 million to $240.3 million
during the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to the corresponding period of the prior year.
The changes in average deposits between the two quarters include the effect of the previously
disclosed sale of the Companys Clifton Forge, Virginia, branch office. The changes also include
the effects of the divestiture of the Drakes Branch, Virginia, branch office, although to a very
small degree, because the sale was late in June.
Compared to the same period in 2005, average federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
increased $11.1 million to $136.5 million during the second quarter of 2006, while the average rate
increased 130 basis points. The average balance of FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt
increased by $45.0 million in 2006 to $204.2 million, while the rate paid on those borrowings
decreased 56 basis points. The significant decrease in the rate is due to the FHLB debt
restructuring near year-end 2005, where the Company paid off high interest rate obligations. The
restructuring reduced the interest rate paid on $50 million of effectively fixed-rate FHLB
borrowings by approximately 1.63%, and the rate paid on $25 million of floating-rate borrowings by
1.86% at the time of the transaction.
Net Interest Income Year to Date Comparison (See Table II)
Net interest income was $36.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $36.3
million for the corresponding period in 2005. Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $38.2
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of $148 thousand from the $38.4 million
for the first six months of 2005. The increase reflects a $351 thousand increase due to increased
volume, which was completely offset by a $499 thousand decrease due to net rate changes on the
liabilities.
During the first six months of 2006, average earning assets increased $70.5 million while
interest-bearing liabilities increased $74.7 million over the comparable period. The yield on
average earning assets increased 52 basis points to 6.85% from 6.33% for the six months ended June
30, 2005. Total cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 82 basis points during the
- 19 -
Table of Contents
same period, leaving the net interest rate spread 30 basis points lower at 3.84% compared to 4.14%
for the same period last year. The Companys tax-equivalent net interest margin of 4.30% for the
six months ended June 30, 2006, decreased 19 basis points from 4.49% in 2005.
The largest contributor to the increase in the yield on average earning assets in 2006, on a
volume-weighted basis, was the increase in the rate earned on the loan portfolio. The increase in
the rate to 7.34% from 6.77%, attributable to the general rise in market rates of interest,
resulted in a $3.7 million increase in tax-equivalent interest income compared to the first six
months of 2005. The increase in the loan portfolio contributed approximately $1.8 million to the
change in interest income. The volume of variable rate loans tied to prime and other indices
increased in response to the recent increases in short-term interest rates.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the tax-equivalent yield on securities available for
sale increased 45 basis points to 5.39% while the average balance increased by $20.1 million.
Although the total portfolio decreased through the period, the average tax-equivalent yield
increased due to the addition of higher-rate securities and the reduction of lower-rate securities.
Compared to the first six months of 2005, average interest-bearing balances with banks increased to
$35.1 million during the six months of 2006, while the yield increased 152 basis points to 4.44%.
The average balances of interest-bearing demand and savings deposits decreased $7.1 million and
$9.7 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The average rate paid on
interest-bearing demand deposits increased 5 basis points, while the average rate paid on savings
increased 97 basis points. Average time deposits increased $35.1 million while the average rate
paid increased 97 basis points from 2.68% in 2005 to 3.65% in 2006. The increases in rates paid
are attributable to the general rise in market rates of interest. The level of average
non-interest-bearing demand deposits increased $12.0 million to $236.0 million through June 30,
2006, compared to the corresponding period of the prior year.
The changes in average deposits between the two periods include the effect of the previously
disclosed sale of the Companys Clifton Forge, Virginia, branch office.
Compared to the same period in 2005, average federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
increased $6.2 million to $133.6 million for the first six months of 2006, and the average rate
paid increased 127 basis points to 3.18%. The average balance of FHLB and other borrowings
increased by $50.2 million in 2006 to $202.1 million, while the rate paid on those borrowings
decreased 67 basis points. Like the quarterly comparison, the significant decrease in the rate is
due to the FHLB debt restructuring near year-end 2005.
- 20 -
Table of Contents
Table I
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans: (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
$ | 1,327,278 | $ | 24,487 | 7.40 | % | $ | 1,296,274 | $ | 22,175 | 6.86 | % | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
1,490 | 30 | 8.08 | % | 3,084 | 28 | 3.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,328,768 | 24,517 | 7.40 | % | 1,299,358 | 22,203 | 6.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
257,838 | 3,218 | 5.01 | % | 243,680 | 2,548 | 4.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
147,869 | 2,367 | 6.42 | % | 141,932 | 2,247 | 6.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
405,707 | 5,585 | 5.52 | % | 385,612 | 4,795 | 4.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities held to maturity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
388 | 5 | 5.17 | % | 401 | 4 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
20,990 | 427 | 8.16 | % | 30,266 | 624 | 8.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
21,378 | 432 | 8.11 | % | 30,667 | 628 | 8.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
41,361 | 479 | 4.65 | % | 23,510 | 180 | 3.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets |
1,797,214 | 31,013 | 6.92 | % | 1,739,147 | 27,806 | 6.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
187,527 | 152,186 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,984,741 | $ | 1,891,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 148,502 | $ | 111 | 0.30 | % | $ | 155,841 | $ | 98 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
355,826 | 1,761 | 1.99 | % | 358,811 | 836 | 0.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
686,161 | 6,454 | 3.77 | % | 662,127 | 4,613 | 2.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,190,489 | 8,326 | 2.81 | % | 1,176,779 | 5,547 | 1.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and repurchase
agreements |
136,522 | 1,142 | 3.36 | % | 125,415 | 645 | 2.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt |
204,172 | 2,384 | 4.68 | % | 159,147 | 2,079 | 5.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,531,183 | 11,852 | 3.10 | % | 1,461,341 | 8,271 | 2.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interestbearing demand deposits |
240,296 | 228,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
14,822 | 13,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
198,440 | 188,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 1,984,741 | $ | 1,891,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income, Tax Equivalent |
$ | 19,161 | $ | 19,535 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Rate Spread (3) |
3.82 | % | 4.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Margin (4) |
4.28 | % | 4.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) at the rate of 35%. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefits of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory rate of 35% for each period presented. The Company believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. | |
(2) | Non-accrual loans are included in average balances outstanding but with no related interest income during the period of non-accrual. | |
(3) | Represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and cost of funds. | |
(4) | Represents tax equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. |
- 21 -
Table of Contents
Table II
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans: (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
$ | 1,330,375 | $ | 48,391 | 7.34 | % | $ | 1,276,295 | $ | 42,848 | 6.77 | % | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
1,531 | 62 | 8.17 | % | 3,751 | 111 | 5.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,331,906 | 48,453 | 7.34 | % | 1,280,046 | 42,959 | 6.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
254,702 | 6,091 | 4.82 | % | 241,929 | 4,843 | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
149,991 | 4,726 | 6.35 | % | 142,672 | 4,580 | 6.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
404,693 | 10,817 | 5.39 | % | 384,601 | 9,423 | 4.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities held to maturity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
389 | 10 | 5.18 | % | 404 | 8 | 3.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
21,938 | 876 | 8.05 | % | 31,346 | 1,288 | 8.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
22,327 | 886 | 8.00 | % | 31,750 | 1,296 | 8.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
35,134 | 774 | 4.44 | % | 27,119 | 393 | 2.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets |
1,794,060 | 60,930 | 6.85 | % | 1,723,516 | 54,071 | 6.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
178,179 | 151,065 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,972,239 | $ | 1,874,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 147,490 | $ | 217 | 0.30 | % | $ | 154,589 | $ | 190 | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
357,804 | 3,393 | 1.91 | % | 367,467 | 1,705 | 0.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
682,598 | 12,363 | 3.65 | % | 647,489 | 8,614 | 2.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,187,892 | 15,973 | 2.71 | % | 1,169,545 | 10,509 | 1.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and repurchase
agreements |
133,566 | 2,103 | 3.18 | % | 127,373 | 1,206 | 1.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt |
202,118 | 4,634 | 4.62 | % | 151,921 | 3,988 | 5.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,523,576 | 22,710 | 3.01 | % | 1,448,839 | 15,703 | 2.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interestbearing demand deposits |
235,987 | 224,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
14,953 | 14,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
197,723 | 187,454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 1,972,239 | $ | 1,874,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income, Tax Equivalent |
$ | 38,220 | $ | 38,368 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Rate Spread (3) |
3.84 | % | 4.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Margin (4) |
4.30 | % | 4.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) at the rate of 35%. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefits of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory rate of 35% for each period presented. The Company believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. | |
(2) | Non-accrual loans are included in average balances outstanding but with no related interest income during the period of non-accrual. | |
(3) | Represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and cost of funds. | |
(4) | Represents tax equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. |
- 22 -
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the changes in tax-equivalent interest earned and paid
resulting from changes in the volume of earning assets and paying liabilities and changes in their
interest rates. The changes in interest due to both rate and volume have been allocated to the
volume and rate columns in proportion to absolute dollar amounts.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006, | Six Months Ended June 30, 2006, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to 2005 | Compared to 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ Increase/(Decrease) due to | $ Increase/(Decrease) due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Earned On: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) |
$ | 521 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 2,314 | $ | 1,786 | $ | 3,708 | $ | 5,494 | ||||||||||||
Securities available
for sale (1) |
249 | 541 | 790 | 498 | 896 | 1,394 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities held
to maturity (1) |
(189 | ) | (7 | ) | (196 | ) | (377 | ) | (33 | ) | (410 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
with other banks |
178 | 121 | 299 | 138 | 243 | 381 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
759 | 2,448 | 3,207 | 2,045 | 4,814 | 6,859 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Paid On: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
(5 | ) | 18 | 13 | (9 | ) | 36 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
(7 | ) | 932 | 925 | (46 | ) | 1,734 | 1,688 | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
173 | 1,669 | 1,842 | 489 | 3,260 | 3,749 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fed funds purchased and
repurchase agreements |
62 | 435 | 497 | 61 | 836 | 897 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other
long-term debt |
542 | (238 | ) | 304 | 1,200 | (554 | ) | 646 | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
765 | 2,816 | 3,581 | 1,695 | 5,312 | 7,007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in net interest income,
tax-equivalent |
$ | (6 | ) | $ | (368 | ) | $ | (374 | ) | $ | 350 | $ | (498 | ) | $ | (148 | ) | |||||||
(1) | Fully taxable equivalent using a rate of 35%. |
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses was $14.7 million at June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005 and $16.0
million at June 30, 2005. The Companys allowance for loan loss activity for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, is as follows:
For the Three Months ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 14,797 | $ | 16,543 | $ | 14,736 | $ | 16,339 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
811 | 1,073 | 1,219 | 1,764 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(1,389 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (2,104 | ) | (2,482 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
491 | 398 | 859 | 755 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification of allowance for
lending-related commitments |
| (392 | ) | | (392 | ) | ||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 14,710 | $ | 15,984 | $ | 14,710 | $ | 15,984 | ||||||||
- 23 -
Table of Contents
The total allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment ratio was 1.12% at June 30, 2006,
compared to 1.11% at December 31, 2005, and 1.23% at June 30, 2005. Management considers the
allowance adequate based upon its analysis of the portfolio as of June 30, 2006. However, no
assurances can be made that future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will not be
necessary as a result of increases in non-performing loans and other factors.
The provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2006 was $811 thousand, a decrease of $262
thousand compared to $1.1 million in 2005. The provision for loan losses for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2006, decreased to $1.2 million when compared to the six-month period ending June
30, 2005, of $1.8 million. The decrease in provision between all periods compared is primarily
attributable to lower net charge-offs. Net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2006 were $898
thousand, compared to $1.2 million in 2005. Year-to-date net charge-offs were $1.2 million
compared to $1.7 million in 2005.
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income consists of all revenues which are not included in interest and fee income
related to earning assets. Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2006 was $5.5 million
compared to $4.6 million in the same period of 2005, an increase of 21%. The second quarter of
2006 included $702 thousand in gain on the sale of the Drakes Branch, Virginia banking office.
During the second quarter of 2006, the Company purchased $25 million of BOLI, which is the majority
of the increase in other assets between December 31, 2005, and June 30, 2006. The increase in cash
surrender value on that policy during the second quarter was approximately $249 thousand. The
remaining components of non-interest income remained relatively stable between the two comparable
quarterly periods.
Non-interest income for the first six months of 2006 was $10.7 million compared to $8.3 million for
the same period of 2005. Included in the 2006 amount is a $676 thousand recovery related to an
historical payments system fraud, in addition to the branch sale gain.
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense totaled $12.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, decreasing $713
thousand, or 5.4%, from the same period in 2005. Year-to-date non-interest expense was $25.9
million, an increase of less than one half of one percent over the 2005 comparable period. The
quarterly decrease and lower year-to-date increase are the result of the Companys refocused
efforts to control costs. Second quarter and year-to-date salaries and benefits decreased $670
thousand and $87 thousand, respectively, from the comparable prior year periods. Other operating
expenses also decreased slightly between the comparable quarter and year-to-date periods.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense is comprised of federal and state current and deferred income taxes on pre-tax
earnings of the Company. Income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income may vary significantly
from statutory rates due to items of income and expense which are excluded, by law, from the
calculation of taxable income. These items are commonly referred to as permanent differences. The
most significant permanent differences for the Company include i) income on state and municipal
securities which are exempt from federal income tax, ii) certain dividend payments which are
deductible by the Company, and iii) tax credits generated by investments in low income housing and
historic rehabilitations.
For the second quarter of 2006, consolidated income taxes were $3.0 million compared to $2.5
million for the second quarter of 2005. For the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the
effective tax rates were 29.16% and 28.56%, respectively. The effective tax rate was higher during
the current quarter due to a lower proportion of tax-free municipal security interest income than
in the second quarter of 2005. For the first six months of 2006, consolidated income taxes were
$5.6 million, a 28.48% effective tax rate, compared to $4.7 million, an effective tax rate of
27.71%, for the first six months of 2005.
- 24 -
Table of Contents
FINANCIAL POSITION
Total assets at June 30, 2006, increased $27 million to $1.98 billion from December 31, 2005, an
annualized growth rate of 2.8%. The lower asset growth rate reflects the mid-year impact of the
sale of one of the Companys banking offices (see Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Securities
Securities available for sale were $405.8 million at June 30, 2006, compared to $404.4 million at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $1.4 million.
Securities held to maturity totaled $20.6 million at June 30, 2006, reflective of continuing
paydowns, maturities and calls within the portfolio. The market value of investment securities
held to maturity was 102.0% and 102.9% of book value at June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005,
respectively.
The Companys available-for-sale securities portfolio is reported at fair value. The fair value of
most securities is determined based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not
available, fair value is determined based on quoted prices of similar instruments.
Available-for-sale and held to maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possible
other-than-temporary impairment. This review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances
of each individual investment such as the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the
expectation for that securitys performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the Companys
intent and ability to hold the security to recovery or maturity. Management does not believe any
unrealized loss, individually or in the aggregate, as of June 30, 2006, represents
other-than-temporary impairment. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities
until such time as the value recovers or the securities mature. Furthermore, the Company believes
the decrease in value is attributable to changes in market interest rates and not the credit
quality of the issuer.
Loan Portfolio
Loans Held for Sale: The $1.3 million balance of loans held for sale at June 30, 2006, represents
long-term mortgage loans that are sold to investors on a best efforts basis. Accordingly, the
Company does not retain the interest rate risk involved in the commitment. The gross notional
amount of outstanding commitments at June 30, 2006, was $7.7 million on 50 loans.
Loans Held for Investment: Total loans held for investment remained relatively stable at $1.32
billion at June 30, 2006, compared to $1.33 billion at December 31, 2005, and increased $22.2
million from June 30, 2005. The average loan to deposit ratio increased to 92.9% for the second
quarter of 2006, compared to 92.3% for the fourth quarter of 2005 and 92.5% for the second quarter
of 2005. The 2006 year-to-date average loans of $1.33 billion increased $51.9 million when
compared to the average for the first six months of 2005 of $1.28 billion.
The held for investment loan portfolio continues to be diversified among loan types and industry
segments. The following table presents the various loan categories and changes in composition as
of June 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005.
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans Held for Investment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and agricultural |
$ | 108,749 | 8.25 | % | $ | 110,211 | 8.28 | % | $ | 103,565 | 7.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
434,161 | 32.92 | % | 464,510 | 34.90 | % | 471,340 | 36.35 | % | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
514,019 | 38.97 | % | 504,386 | 37.89 | % | 481,577 | 37.14 | % | |||||||||||||||
Construction |
160,685 | 12.18 | % | 143,976 | 10.82 | % | 126,678 | 9.77 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
99,018 | 7.51 | % | 106,148 | 7.97 | % | 111,654 | 8.61 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other |
2,311 | 0.17 | % | 1,808 | 0.14 | % | 1,914 | 0.14 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,318,943 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,331,039 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,296,728 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans Held for Sale |
$ | 1,293 | $ | 1,274 | $ | 1,075 | ||||||||||||||||||
- 25 -
Table of Contents
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on non-accrual status, loans contractually past due 90 days or
more and still accruing interest, other real estate owned (OREO), and repossessions.
Non-performing assets were $3.9 million at June 30, 2006, $4.8 million at December 31, 2005, and
$5.1 million at June 30, 2005. The percentage of non-performing assets to total loans, OREO and
repossessions was 0.29% at June 30, 2006, down from 0.36% at December 31, 2005, and 0.40% at June
30, 2005.
The following schedule details non-performing assets by category at the close of each of the
quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and December 31, 2005.
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2005 | 2005 | |||||||||
Non-accrual |
$ | 2,937 | $ | 3,383 | $ | 4,132 | ||||||
Ninety days past due and accruing |
| 11 | | |||||||||
Other real estate owned |
910 | 1,400 | 975 | |||||||||
Repossessions |
3 | 55 | 29 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 3,850 | $ | 4,849 | $ | 5,136 | ||||||
Restructured loans
performing in accordance
with modified terms |
$ | 289 | $ | 302 | $ | 327 | ||||||
At June 30, 2006, non-accrual loans decreased $446 thousand from December 31, 2005, and $1.2
million from June 30, 2005. The decrease in non-accrual loans is reflective of the Companys
strict underwriting and improving credit quality. Ongoing activity within the classification and
categories of non-performing loans continues to include collections on delinquencies, foreclosures
and movements into or out of the non-performing classification as a result of changing customer
business conditions. OREO of $910 thousand decreased from both June 30 and December 31, 2005,
levels mostly as a result of property sales. OREO is carried at the lesser of estimated net realizable
value or cost.
Deposits and Other Borrowings
Total deposits grew by $7.2 million during the first six months of 2006, net of the transfer of
deposits in the Drakes Branch, Virginia, office. Non interest-bearing demand deposits increased by
$23.1 million and interest-bearing demand deposits decreased $4.5 million. Savings decreased $10.7
million and time deposits decreased $739 thousand.
In December 2005, the Company prepaid $77 million of FHLB advances, with interest rates ranging
from 5.71% to 6.27%, with a weighted average rate and maturity of 5.96% and 4.3 years,
respectively. In January 2006, the Company drew additional FHLB advances of $75 million, with a
floating interest rate based on 3-month LIBOR, and which mature in fifteen years. The FHLB has the
option, after five years, to convert the new advances to a fixed interest rate of 4%. Concurrent
with the new advances, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement, effectively fixing
the rate on $50 million of the new advances for five years. Under the terms of the swap, the
Company will pay fixed interest payments of 4.335% on a notional $50 million, and receive floating
interest rate payments of 3-month LIBOR less 45 basis points. The Company expects to save
approximately $813 thousand in annual interest expense on the $50 million fixed by the interest
rate swap. The remaining $25 million will float at an interest rate based on 3-month LIBOR. The
initial interest rate on the floating portion of the FHLB advances is approximately 1.86% less than
the weighted average rate of the prepaid advances. For further discussion of FHLB borrowings, see
the Borrowings note to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements increased $25.4 million in the first six months of
2006. There were no federal funds purchased outstanding at June 30, 2006, as the Company has been
in a fairly even liquidity position throughout the first six months of 2006.
- 26 -
Table of Contents
Stockholders Equity
Total stockholders equity increased $3.4 million from December 31, 2005, as the Company continued
to balance capital adequacy and returns to stockholders. The increase in equity was due mainly to
net earnings of $14.1 million after dividends paid to stockholders of $5.8 million, net changes of
$2.5 million to treasury stock, and increases in other comprehensive loss of $2.5 million.
Risk-based capital guidelines and the leverage ratio measure capital adequacy of banking
institutions. Risk-based capital guidelines weight balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet
commitments based on inherent risks associated with the respective asset types. At June 30, 2006,
the Companys total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 12.14% versus 11.65% at December 31,
2005. The Companys Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 11.05% at June 30, 2006,
compared to 10.54% at December 31, 2005. The Companys Tier 1 leverage ratio at June 30, 2006, was
8.06% compared to 7.77% at December 31, 2005. All of the Companys regulatory capital ratios
exceed the current well-capitalized levels prescribed for banks.
- 27 -
Table of Contents
PART
I.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2006, the Company maintained a significant level of liquidity in the form of cash and
cash equivalent balances of $73.3 million, investment securities available for sale of $405.8
million, and FHLB credit availability of approximately $212.4 million. Cash and cash equivalents
as well as advances from the FHLB are immediately available for satisfaction of deposit
withdrawals, customer credit needs and operations of the Company. Investment securities available
for sale represent a secondary level of liquidity available for conversion to liquid funds in the
event of extraordinary needs. The Company also maintains approved lines of credit with
correspondent banks as backup liquidity sources.
The Company maintains a liquidity policy as a means to manage the liquidity risk process and
associated risk. The policy includes a Liquidity Contingency Plan (the Liquidity Plan) that is
designed as a tool for the Company to detect liquidity issues promptly in order to protect
depositors, creditors and shareholders. The Liquidity Plan includes monitoring various internal and
external indicators such as changes in core deposits and changes in market conditions. It provides
for timely responses to a wide variety of funding scenarios ranging from changes in loan demand to
a decline in the Companys quarterly earnings to a decline in the market price of the Companys
stock. The Liquidity Plan calls for specific responses designed to meet a wide range of liquidity
needs based upon assessments on a recurring basis by management and the Board of Directors.
Interest Rate Risk and Asset/Liability Management
The Companys profitability is dependent to a large extent upon its net interest income, which is
the difference between its interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and
securities, and its interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to
the degree that interest-earning assets reprice differently than interest-bearing liabilities. The
Company manages its mix of assets and liabilities with the goals of limiting its exposure to
interest rate risk, ensuring adequate liquidity, and coordinating its sources and uses of funds
while maintaining an acceptable level of net interest income given the current interest rate
environment.
The Companys primary component of operational revenue, net interest income, is subject to
variation as a result of changes in interest rate environments in conjunction with unbalanced
repricing opportunities on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate risk has
four primary components including repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and option risk.
Repricing risk occurs when earning assets and paying liabilities reprice at differing times as
interest rates change. Basis risk occurs when the underlying rates on the assets and liabilities
the institution holds change at different levels or in varying degrees. Yield curve risk is the
risk of adverse consequences as a result of unequal changes in the spread between two or more rates
for different maturities for the same instrument. Lastly, option risk is due to embedded options,
often put or call options, given or sold to holders of financial instruments.
In order to mitigate the effect of changes in the general level of interest rates, the Company
manages repricing opportunities and thus, its interest rate sensitivity. The Company seeks to
control its interest rate risk exposure to insulate net interest income and net earnings from
fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. To measure its exposure to interest rate
risk, quarterly simulations of net interest income are performed using financial models that
project net interest income through a range of possible interest rate environments including
rising, declining, most likely and flat rate scenarios. The simulation model used by the Company
captures all earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and all off-balance sheet financial
instruments and combines the various factors affecting rate sensitivity into an earnings outlook.
The results of these simulations indicate the existence and severity of interest rate risk in each
of those rate environments based upon the current balance sheet position, assumptions as to changes
in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-paying liabilities and managements
estimate of yields to be attained in those future rate environments and rates that will be paid on
various deposit instruments and borrowings. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a
result, the model cannot precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net
interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and
frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and managements
strategies. However, the earnings simulation model is currently the best tool available to
management for managing interest rate risk.
Specific strategies for management of interest rate risk have included shortening the amortized
maturity of new fixed-rate loans, increasing the volume of adjustable-rate loans to reduce the
average maturity of the Companys interest-earning assets and monitoring the term structure of
liabilities to maintain a balanced mix of maturity and repricing structures to mitigate the
potential exposure. Based upon the latest simulation, the Company believes that it is biased
toward an asset sensitive
- 28 -
Table of Contents
position. Absent adequate management, asset sensitive positions can negatively impact net interest
income in a falling rate environment or, alternatively, positively impact net interest income in a
rising rate environment.
The Company has established policy limits for tolerance of interest rate risk that allow for no
more than a 10% reduction in projected net interest income based on a comparison of quarterly net
interest income simulations in various interest rate scenarios. In addition, the policy addresses
exposure limits to changes in the economic value of equity according to predefined policy
guidelines. The most recent simulation indicates that current exposure to interest rate risk is
within the Companys defined policy limits.
The following table summarizes the impact on net interest income and the economic value of equity
as of June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, of immediate and sustained rate shocks in the interest
rate environment of plus and minus 200 basis points from the base simulation, assuming no remedial
measures are affected.
Rate Sensitivity Analysis
June 30, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Change in | Change in | ||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in | Net Interest | % | Econcomic Value | % | ||||||||||||
Interest Rates (Basis Points) | Income | Change | of Equity | Change | ||||||||||||
200 |
$ | 1,290 | 1.7 | $ | 183 | 0.1 | ||||||||||
100 |
728 | 1.0 | 3,966 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
(100) |
(794 | ) | (1.0 | ) | 3,313 | 1.1 | ||||||||||
(200) |
(2,635 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (7,899 | ) | (2.6 | ) | ||||||||
December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in | Change in | |||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in | Net Interest | % | Econcomic Value | % | ||||||||||||
Interest Rates (Basis Points) | Income | Change | of Equity | Change | ||||||||||||
200 |
$ | (764 | ) | (1.0 | ) | $ | (13,392 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||
100 |
(403 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (6,211 | ) | (2.2 | ) | ||||||||
(100) |
(950 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (4,376 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||
(200) |
(4,299 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (15,755 | ) | (5.5 | ) |
When comparing the impact of the rate shock analysis between June 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005,
the changes in net interest income reflect relatively similar results and the impact of the balance
sheet composition of assets and liabilities as the profile continues to reflect asset sensitivity.
The asset sensitivity is reflected in on-hand liquidity in cash and cash equivalents of $73.3
million and in the loan portfolio which includes adjustable or variable rates on approximately 50%
of the portfolio at June 30, 2006.
The economic value of equity is a measure which reflects the impact of changing rates of the
underlying values of the Companys assets and liabilities in various rate scenarios. The scenarios
illustrate the potential estimated impact of instantaneous rate shocks on the underlying value of
equity. The economic value of the equity is based on the present value of all the future cash
flows under the different rate scenarios.
Additionally, the Company entered into a pay fixed, receive variable derivative interest rate swap
agreement in January 2006. The Company accounts for the derivate swap instrument as a cash flow
hedge under the shortcut method allowed by FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. At June 30, 2006, the fair market value of the swap was
approximately $1.5 million.
- 29 -
Table of Contents
PART
I.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 13a-15(b). Based on that evaluation, the Companys CEO
along with the Companys CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its
consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC filings.
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys disclosure
controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can
occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls.
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
- 30 -
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is currently a defendant in various legal actions and asserted claims involving lending
and collection activities and other matters in the normal course of business. While the Company
and legal counsel are unable to assess the ultimate outcome of each of these matters with
certainty, they are of the belief that the resolution of these actions should not have a material
adverse affect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors as presented in the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Not Applicable
(b) Not Applicable
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth open market purchases by the Company of its equity securities during
the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Maximum | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Total # of | Average | Shares Purchased | May yet be | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | as Part of Publicly | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Purchased | per Share | Announced Plan | Under the Plan | |||||||||||||
January 1-31, 2006 |
23,161 | $ | 32.10 | 23,161 | 284,455 | |||||||||||
February 1-28, 2006 |
32,900 | 32.14 | 32,900 | 287,234 | ||||||||||||
March 1-31, 2006 |
25,000 | 31.81 | 25,000 | 265,566 | ||||||||||||
April 1-30, 2006 |
10,000 | 30.38 | 10,000 | 255,566 | ||||||||||||
May 1-31, 2006 |
14,300 | 30.68 | 14,300 | 248,337 | ||||||||||||
June 1-30, 2006 |
25,500 | 30.85 | 25,500 | 227,437 | ||||||||||||
Total |
130,861 | $ | 31.52 | 130,861 | ||||||||||||
The Companys stock repurchase plan, as amended, allows the purchase and retention of up to 550,000
shares. The plan has no expiration date and remains open. The Company held 322,563 shares in
treasury at June 30, 2006.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
- 31 -
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Exhibit | |||
3(i)
|
Articles of Incorporation of First Community Bancshares, Inc., as amended. (1) | |||
3(ii)
|
Bylaws of First Community Bancshares, Inc., as amended. (2) | |||
4.1
|
Specimen stock certificate of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (3) | |||
4.2
|
Indenture Agreement dated September 25, 2003. (11) | |||
4.3
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of FCBI Capital Trust dated September 25, 2003. (11) | |||
4.4
|
Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement dated September 25, 2003. (11) | |||
10.1
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Contracts (2) and Plan. (4)* | |||
10.1.1
|
Amendment to the First Community Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (12)* | |||
10.2
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Non-Qualified Directors Stock Option Plan. (5)* | |||
10.3
|
Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2000, and amended October 17, 2000, between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and John M. Mendez. (2)(6)* | |||
10.4
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2000 Executive Retention Plan, as amended. (4)* | |||
10.5
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. Split Dollar Plan and Agreement. (4)* | |||
10.6
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Directors Supplemental Retirement Plan. (2)* | |||
10.6.1
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Directors Supplemental Retirement Plan. Second Amendment (B. W. Harvey, Sr. October 19, 2004). (14)* | |||
10.7
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. Wrap Plan. (3)* | |||
10.8
|
Employment Agreement between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and J. E. Causey Davis. (8)* | |||
10.9
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between First Community Bancshares, Inc., its Directors and Certain Executive Officers. (9)* | |||
10.10
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between First Community Bank, N. A., its Directors and Certain Executive Officers. (9)* | |||
10.12
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock Option Plan (10) and Stock Award Agreement (13)* | |||
10.13
|
Change of control agreement between First Community Bank, N. A. and Mark A. Wendel. (15) | |||
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | |||
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | |||
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer Section 1350. |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
- 32 -
Table of Contents
(1) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 5, 2005. | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 14, 2002. | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, filed on March 25, 2003, as amended on March 31, 2003. | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, filed on March 30, 2000, as amended April 13, 2000. | |
(5) | The option agreements entered into pursuant to the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Non-Qualified Directors Stock Option Plan are incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 14, 2002. | |
(6) | First Community Bancshares, Inc. has entered into substantially identical agreements with Robert L. Buzzo and E. Stephen Lilly, with the only differences being with respect to title, salary and the use of a vehicle. | |
(7) | Not used. | |
(8) | Incorporated by reference from S-4 Registration Statement filed on March 28, 2003. The Company has entered into a substantially identical contract with Phillip R. Carriger dated March 31, 2004. | |
(9) | Form of indemnification agreement entered into by the Corporation and by First Community Bank, N. A. with their respective directors and certain officers of each including, for the registrant and Bank: John M. Mendez, Robert L. Schumacher, Robert L. Buzzo, Kenneth P. Mulkey, E. Stephen Lilly and at the Bank level: Samuel L. Elmore. Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 15, 2004, and amended on May 19, 2004. | |
(10) | Incorporated by reference from the 2004 First Community Bancshares, Inc. Definitive Proxy filed on March 19, 2004. | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 filed on November 10, 2003. | |
(12) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 filed on May 7, 2004. | |
(13) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 filed on August 6, 2004. | |
(14) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, and filed on March 16, 2005. Amendments in substantially similar form were executed for Directors Clark, Kantor, Hamner, Modena, Perkinson, Stafford, and Stafford II but are not filed herewith. | |
(15) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, and filed on March 15, 2006. |
- 33 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
First Community Bancshares, Inc.
DATE: August 9, 2006
/s/ John M. Mendez
|
||
President & Chief Executive Officer |
||
(Duly Authorized Officer) |
||
DATE: August 9, 2006 |
||
/s/ David D. Brown
|
||
Chief Financial Officer |
||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
- 34 -
Table of Contents