FIRST COMMUNITY BANKSHARES INC /VA/ - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
Commission file number 000-19297
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Nevada | 55-0694814 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
P.O. Box 989 Bluefield, Virginia |
24605-0989 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(276) 326-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value; 10,968,097 shares outstanding as of November 3, 2008
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008
INDEX
-2-
Table of Contents
PART I. ITEM 1. Financial Statements
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 53,238 | $ | 50,051 | ||||
Interest-bearing balances with banks |
664 | 2,695 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
53,902 | 52,746 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $607,249 at
September 30, 2008; $674,937 at December 31, 2007) |
513,001 | 664,120 | ||||||
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $9,187 at
September 30, 2008; $12,298 at December 31, 2007) |
9,043 | 12,075 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
140 | 811 | ||||||
Loans held for investment, net of unearned income |
1,168,286 | 1,225,502 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
14,510 | 12,833 | ||||||
Net loans held for investment |
1,153,776 | 1,212,669 | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
50,504 | 48,383 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
896 | 545 | ||||||
Interest receivable |
9,156 | 12,465 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
72,222 | 70,056 | ||||||
Other assets |
104,817 | 75,968 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 1,967,457 | $ | 2,149,838 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing |
$ | 214,582 | $ | 224,087 | ||||
Interest-bearing |
1,134,962 | 1,169,356 | ||||||
Total Deposits |
1,349,544 | 1,393,443 | ||||||
Interest, taxes and other liabilities |
20,494 | 21,454 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
29,500 | 18,500 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
180,388 | 207,427 | ||||||
FHLB borrowings and other indebtedness |
216,720 | 291,916 | ||||||
Total Liabilities |
1,796,646 | 1,932,740 | ||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value undesignated; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 11,499,018 shares
issued at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, including 531,421
and 429,372 shares in treasury, respectively |
11,499 | 11,499 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
108,862 | 108,825 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
124,731 | 117,670 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost |
(16,882 | ) | (13,613 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(57,399 | ) | (7,283 | ) | ||||
Total Stockholders Equity |
170,811 | 217,098 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity |
$ | 1,967,457 | $ | 2,149,838 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-3-
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Interest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans held for investment |
$ | 19,266 | $ | 23,478 | $ | 60,394 | $ | 70,401 | ||||||||
Interest on securities-taxable |
5,567 | 6,772 | 17,101 | 17,783 | ||||||||||||
Interest on securities-nontaxable |
1,708 | 2,078 | 5,775 | 6,140 | ||||||||||||
Interest on deposits in banks |
9 | 404 | 260 | 1,073 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
26,550 | 32,732 | 83,530 | 95,397 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
6,684 | 10,083 | 22,543 | 29,131 | ||||||||||||
Interest on borrowings |
3,543 | 5,506 | 11,679 | 15,094 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
10,227 | 15,589 | 34,222 | 44,225 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
16,323 | 17,143 | 49,308 | 51,172 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,461 | | 4,721 | | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
12,862 | 17,143 | 44,587 | 51,172 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Wealth management income |
957 | 908 | 2,954 | 2,931 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
3,808 | 3,006 | 10,370 | 8,077 | ||||||||||||
Other service charges, commissions and fees |
1,040 | 902 | 3,225 | 2,609 | ||||||||||||
Insurance commissions |
1,240 | | 3,730 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities |
163 | 50 | 2,133 | 209 | ||||||||||||
Other operating income |
675 | 1,154 | 2,336 | 2,956 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
7,883 | 6,020 | 24,748 | 16,782 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
7,371 | 6,544 | 22,741 | 19,120 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy expense of bank premises |
1,297 | 933 | 3,717 | 3,010 | ||||||||||||
Furniture and equipment expense |
924 | 844 | 2,798 | 2,447 | ||||||||||||
Intangible amortization |
166 | 105 | 484 | 313 | ||||||||||||
Prepayment penalty on FHLB advance |
| | 1,647 | | ||||||||||||
Other operating expense |
4,683 | 4,410 | 14,096 | 12,179 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
14,441 | 12,836 | 45,483 | 37,069 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
6,304 | 10,327 | 23,852 | 30,885 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,753 | 3,011 | 6,751 | 9,006 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,551 | $ | 7,316 | $ | 17,101 | $ | 21,879 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.95 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.41 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.94 | ||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding |
10,956,867 | 11,179,322 | 10,992,901 | 11,232,895 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
11,034,059 | 11,230,220 | 11,071,925 | 11,299,727 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-4-
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 17,101 | $ | 21,879 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,721 | | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
2,785 | 2,362 | ||||||
Intangible amortization |
484 | 313 | ||||||
Net investment amortization and accretion |
(292 | ) | 435 | |||||
Net gain on the sale of assets |
(2,070 | ) | (186 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans originated for sale |
(28,299 | ) | (34,794 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans |
29,137 | 33,472 | ||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
(167 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||
Deferred
income tax (benefit) expense |
(330 | ) | 552 | |||||
Decrease (increase) in interest receivable |
3,309 | (1,148 | ) | |||||
Other operating activities, net |
2,522 | (967 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
28,901 | 21,727 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale |
97,232 | 1,288 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale |
80,997 | 22,258 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity |
3,042 | 7,437 | ||||||
Purchase of securities available-for-sale |
(108,124 | ) | (196,479 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in loans held for investment |
54,828 | 44,322 | ||||||
Purchase of FHLB stock |
| (4,077 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in insurance agency acquisitions |
(1,080 | ) | (5,135 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of equipment |
23 | | ||||||
Purchase of premises and equipment |
(4,922 | ) | (11,981 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
121,996 | (142,367 | ) | |||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in demand and savings deposits |
8,088 | 13,283 | ||||||
Net decrease in time deposits |
(51,987 | ) | (5,180 | ) | ||||
Net increase in federal funds purchased |
11,000 | 7,900 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
(27,039 | ) | 25,599 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in FHLB and other borrowings |
(75,196 | ) | 93,698 | |||||
Prepayment penalty |
(1,647 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
440 | 715 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
49 | 290 | ||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
(4,222 | ) | (5,035 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(9,227 | ) | (9,085 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(149,741 | ) | 122,185 | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
1,156 | 1,545 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
52,746 | 57,759 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 53,902 | $ | 59,304 | ||||
Supplemental information Noncash items |
||||||||
Transfer of loans to other real estate |
$ | 1,413 | $ | 973 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-5-
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Income (Loss) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2007 |
$ | 11,499 | $ | 108,806 | $ | 100,117 | $ | (7,924 | ) | $ | 232 | $ | 212,730 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 21,879 | | | 21,879 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities
available for sale |
| | | | (5,834 | ) | (5,834 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net income |
(16 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge |
| | | | (372 | ) | (372 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 21,879 | | (6,222 | ) | 15,657 | |||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared |
| | (9,085 | ) | | | (9,085 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of 163,500 treasury shares |
| | | (5,035 | ) | | (5,035 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of GreenPoint Insurance
49,088 shares issued |
| 133 | | 1,524 | | 1,657 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense |
| 121 | | 87 | | 208 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
| 337 | | | | 337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Option exercises 41,470 shares |
| (603 | ) | | 1,297 | | 694 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance September 30, 2007 |
$ | 11,499 | $ | 108,794 | $ | 112,911 | $ | (10,051 | ) | $ | (5,990 | ) | $ | 217,163 | ||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2008 |
$ | 11,499 | $ | 108,825 | $ | 117,670 | $ | (13,613 | ) | $ | (7,283 | ) | $ | 217,098 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 17,101 | | | 17,101 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale |
| | | | (49,081 | ) | (49,081 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for
gains realized in net income |
| | | | (977 | ) | (977 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedge |
| | | | (58 | ) | (58 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
| | 17,101 | | (50,116 | ) | (33,015 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
| | (813 | ) | | | (813 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared |
| | (9,227 | ) | | | (9,227 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of 132,100 treasury shares |
| | | (4,222 | ) | | (4,222 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of GreenPoint Insurance Group
7,728 shares issued |
| 22 | | 245 | | 267 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense |
| 161 | | | | 161 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options |
| 122 | | | | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||
Option exercises 22,323 shares |
| (268 | ) | | 708 | | 440 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance September 30, 2008 |
$ | 11,499 | $ | 108,862 | $ | 124,731 | $ | (16,882 | ) | $ | (57,399 | ) | $ | 170,811 | ||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-6-
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. General
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of First Community Bancshares, Inc.
and subsidiaries (First Community or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation have been made.
These results are not necessarily indicative of the results of consolidated operations that might
be expected for the full calendar year.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States have been omitted in accordance with standards for the preparation of interim consolidated
financial statements. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2007 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
A more complete and detailed description of First Communitys significant accounting policies is
included within Footnote 1 of Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2007. Further discussion of the Companys
application of critical accounting policies is included within the Application of Critical
Accounting Policies section of Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, included herein.
The Company includes interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities in income tax
expense. The Company and its subsidiaries tax filings for the years ended December 31, 2004
through 2007 are currently open to audit under statutes of limitation by the Internal Revenue
Service and various state tax departments.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company operates within two business segments, community banking and
insurance services.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). This statement establishes a
framework for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are
presented in conformity with US GAAP. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and is not
expected to have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This statement
requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities in order to
improve the transparency of financial reporting. Entities are required to provide enhanced
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of SFAS 161 on its disclosures.
In
December 2007, the FASB revised Statement No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). This
statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as
of that date. This statement recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business
combination or a gain from a bargain purchase. This statement also defines the acquirer as the
entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes
the acquisition date as the date that the acquiree achieves control. Additionally this statement
determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS
141R on its financial condition, results of operations and disclosures.
-7-
Table of Contents
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). This statement applies to all
entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but
will affect only those entities that have an outstanding non-controlling interest in one or more
subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
January 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 160 on its financial
condition, results of operations and disclosures.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial
assets and liabilities at fair value. The Statements objective is to reduce both complexity in
accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related
assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 requires companies to provide
additional information that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more
easily understand the effect of the companys choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also
requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company
has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not
have an effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early
adoption permitted. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a significant effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus regarding EITF 06-4,
Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. The scope of EITF 06-4 is limited to the recognition of
a liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life insurance policies
that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to postretirement periods. Therefore, this EITF
would not apply to a split-dollar life insurance arrangement that provides a specified benefit to
an employee that is limited to the employees active service period with an employer. On January
1, 2008, the Company made a cumulative effect adjustment to equity of $813 thousand in connection
with the adoption of EITF 06-4.
Note 2. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Branching Activity
On July 31, 2008, the Company signed a definitive agreement providing for the acquisition of Coddle
Creek Financial Corp. (Coddle Creek) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mooresville Savings Bank,
SSB (Mooresville). Mooresville is a $156.56 million state-chartered savings bank headquartered
in Mooresville, North Carolina. The definitive agreement provides for the payment of $19.60 and .9046 of a share of the Companys common stock for each outstanding share of Coddle Creek common
stock. Coddle Creek and Mooresville will be merged with and into the Company and First Community
Bank, N. A., respectively. The transaction has received the required regulatory approvals or
waivers and been approved by the stockholders of Coddle Creek. The merger is expected to close in
the fourth quarter of 2008.
In September 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of GreenPoint Insurance Group, Inc.
(GreenPoint), a High Point, North Carolina, insurance agency. In connection with the initial
payment of approximately $1.66 million, the Company issued 49,088 shares of common stock. Under
the terms of the stock purchase agreement, former shareholders of GreenPoint are entitled to
additional consideration aggregating up to $1.45 million in the form of cash or the Companys
common stock, valued at the time of issuance, if certain future operating performance targets are
met. If those operating targets are met, the value of the consideration ultimately paid will be
added to the cost of the acquisition, which will increase the amount of goodwill related to the
acquisition. The Company assumed $5.57 million of debt in connection with the acquisition, of
which approximately $5.00 million was retired at closing. In March 2008, the Company issued 7,728
additional shares in connection with the acquisition, resulting in a goodwill adjustment of
approximately $267 thousand. In July 2008, GreenPoint acquired REL Insurance Agency for $1.08
million in an all cash transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, the former principal of REL
is entitled to additional consideration aggregating up to $720 thousand, if certain operating
targets are met. The acquisition and activity of GreenPoint has added a total $9.86 million of
goodwill and intangibles.
In May 2008, the Company opened a new branch location in Summersville, West Virginia. In December
2007, the Company opened two new branch locations in the Richmond, Virginia, area. In November and
October 2007, the Company opened new
-8-
Table of Contents
branch locations in Princeton and Daniels, West Virginia, respectively. In March 2007, the Company
opened two new branch locations in the Winston-Salem, North Carolina, area.
Note 3. Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of
available-for-sale securities were as follows:
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities |
$ | 68,424 | $ | 106 | $ | (302 | ) | $ | 68,228 | |||||||
States and political subdivisions |
163,942 | 563 | (7,976 | ) | 156,529 | |||||||||||
Trust-preferred securities |
164,203 | | (76,681 | ) | 87,522 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
202,214 | 397 | (10,042 | ) | 192,569 | |||||||||||
Equities |
8,466 | 402 | (715 | ) | 8,153 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 607,249 | $ | 1,468 | $ | (95,716 | ) | $ | 513,001 | |||||||
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities |
$ | 136,791 | $ | 2,446 | $ | | $ | 139,237 | ||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
186,834 | 2,667 | (965 | ) | 188,536 | |||||||||||
Trust-preferred securities |
164,731 | | (14,106 | ) | 150,625 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
177,984 | 816 | (2,073 | ) | 176,727 | |||||||||||
Equities |
8,597 | 814 | (416 | ) | 8,995 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 674,937 | $ | 6,743 | $ | (17,560 | ) | $ | 664,120 | |||||||
As of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of
held-to-maturity securities were as follows:
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 8,668 | $ | 146 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 8,812 | |||||||
Other securities |
375 | | | 375 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9,043 | $ | 146 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 9,187 | |||||||
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 11,699 | $ | 223 | $ | | $ | 11,922 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
375 | | | 375 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 12,075 | $ | 223 | $ | | $ | 12,298 | ||||||||
-9-
Table of Contents
The following table reflects those investments in an unrealized loss position at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007. The Company has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or
recovery any security in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months.
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
U. S. Government agency
securities |
$ | 58,122 | $ | (302 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 58,122 | $ | (302 | ) | ||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
106,525 | (5,217 | ) | 15,193 | (2,761 | ) | 121,718 | (7,978 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Trust-preferred securities |
24,655 | (33,745 | ) | 62,867 | (42,936 | ) | 87,522 | (76,681 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
141,804 | (1,532 | ) | 19,205 | (8,510 | ) | 161,009 | (10,042 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
2,806 | (560 | ) | 2,268 | (155 | ) | 5,074 | (715 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 333,912 | $ | (41,356 | ) | $ | 99,533 | $ | (54,362 | ) | $ | 433,445 | $ | (95,718 | ) | |||||||||
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U. S. Government agency
securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
40,461 | (900 | ) | 12,287 | (65 | ) | 52,748 | (965 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Trust-preferred securities |
129,006 | (12,431 | ) | 21,994 | (1,675 | ) | 151,000 | (14,106 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
7,991 | (108 | ) | 63,393 | (1,965 | ) | 71,384 | (2,073 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
2,269 | (345 | ) | 1,759 | (71 | ) | 4,028 | (416 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 179,727 | $ | (13,784 | ) | $ | 99,433 | $ | (3,776 | ) | $ | 279,160 | $ | (17,560 | ) | |||||||||
At September 30, 2008, there were 375 individual security holdings in an unrealized loss position.
The Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until such time as the value
recovers or the securities mature. Furthermore, the Company believes the declines in value are
attributable to changes in market interest rates, changes in market credit risk premiums, and
current market illiquidity.
Included in available-for-sale securities is a portfolio of trust-preferred securities with a total
market value of approximately $87.52 million as of September 30, 2008. That portfolio is comprised
of single-issue securities and pooled trust-preferred securities. The single-issue securities are
trust-preferred issuances from some of the largest banks in the
nation, composite A-rated or higher, and had a total market value
of approximately $40.95 million as of September 30, 2008, compared with their adjusted cost basis
of approximately $55.45 million.
At September 30, 2008, the total market value of the pooled trust-preferred securities was
approximately $46.57 million, compared with an adjusted cost basis of approximately $108.76
million. The collateral underlying these securities is comprised of
86% of bank trust-preferred
securities and subordinated debt issuances of over 500 banks nationwide. The remaining collateral
is from insurance companies and real estate investment trusts. During
the third quarter, two of the securities experienced a credit rating downgrade from one rating agency, and certain of these securities are on negative credit watch by one or more rating firms. All of the pooled trust-preferred
securities remain composite A-rated and have not deferred an interest payment. The securities carry variable rate structures that
float at a prescribed margin over 3-month LIBOR. The Company has modeled the expected cash flows
from the pooled trust-preferred securities and, at present, does not expect to have an adverse cash
flow effect under any of the scenarios modeled due to the existence of other subordinate classes
within the pools.
Although the Company has both the intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity, the
Company is closely monitoring this portfolio due to the substantial market discounts. The market
discounts reflect the credit market disruption in bank subordinated debt instruments and the
possibility of future negative credit events within the banking sector, which could affect
collateral within certain of the pools and single-issue securities. Monitoring for
other-than-temporary impairment (OTI) is dependent on the aforementioned assumptions regarding
future credit events and the general strength of the banking industry as it deals with credit
losses in the current recessionary real estate market. Acceleration of bank losses and
-10-
Table of Contents
the
possibility of unforeseen bank failures could result in changes in the Companys outlook for these
securities and possible future OTI. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that continued
deterioration of credit portfolios within certain of those banks will not lead to unanticipated
deferrals of interest payments and defaults. At present, cash flow modeling indicates varying
ability to absorb additional deferrals and defaults before incurring breaks in interest or
principal for the various pools.
Note 4. Loans
Loans, net of unearned income, consist of the following:
September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Loans held for investment: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and agricultural |
$ | 83,271 | 7.13 | % | $ | 96,261 | 7.85 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
386,287 | 33.06 | % | 386,112 | 31.51 | % | ||||||||||
Residential real estate |
498,721 | 42.69 | % | 498,345 | 40.66 | % | ||||||||||
Construction |
127,076 | 10.88 | % | 163,310 | 13.33 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
66,333 | 5.68 | % | 75,447 | 6.16 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
6,598 | 0.56 | % | 6,027 | 0.49 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,168,286 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,225,502 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 140 | $ | 811 | ||||||||||||
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk beyond the
amount recognized on the balance sheet. The contractual amounts of those instruments reflect the
extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. The
Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses
the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is not a
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by the Company upon extension of credit, is based
on managements credit evaluation of the counterparties. Collateral held varies but may include
accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial
properties.
Standby letters of credit and written financial guarantees are conditional commitments issued by
the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved
in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities
to customers. To the extent deemed necessary, collateral of varying types and amounts is held to
secure customer performance under certain of those letters of credit outstanding.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are commitments to extend credit
(including availability of lines of credit) of $188.81 million and standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees written of $2.75 million at September 30, 2008. Additionally, the Company had
gross notional amount of outstanding commitments to lend related to secondary market mortgage loans
of $4.36 million at September 30, 2008.
Note 5. Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to absorb probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by charges to earnings in the form of
provision for loan losses and recoveries of prior loan charge-offs, and decreased by loans charged
off. The provision is calculated to bring the allowance to a level which, according to a
systematic process of measurement, reflects the amount management estimates is needed to absorb
probable losses within the portfolio.
-11-
Table of Contents
Management performs periodic assessments to determine the appropriate level of allowance.
Differences between actual loan loss experience and estimates are reflected through adjustments
that are made by either increasing or decreasing the loss provision based upon current measurement
criteria. Commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios are evaluated separately for purposes
of determining the allowance. The specific components of the allowance include allocations to
individual commercial credits and allocations to the remaining non-homogeneous and homogeneous
pools of loans. Managements allocations are based on judgment of qualitative and quantitative
factors about both macro and micro economic conditions reflected within the portfolio of loans and
the economy as a whole. Factors considered in this evaluation include, but are not necessarily
limited to, probable losses from loan and other credit arrangements, general economic conditions,
changes in credit concentrations or pledged collateral, historical loan loss experience, and trends
in portfolio volume, maturities, composition, delinquencies, and non-accruals. While management
has allocated the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments, the entire allowance is
available for use against any type of loan loss deemed appropriate by management.
The following table details the Companys allowance for loan loss activity for the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 13,433 | $ | 13,934 | $ | 12,833 | $ | 14,549 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,461 | | 4,721 | | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(2,601 | ) | (1,009 | ) | (4,765 | ) | (2,813 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
217 | 265 | 1,721 | 1,454 | ||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 14,510 | $ | 13,190 | $ | 14,510 | $ | 13,190 | ||||||||
Note 6. Deposits
The following is a summary of interest-bearing deposits by type as of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007.
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 186,403 | $ | 153,570 | ||||
Savings and money market deposits |
312,451 | 327,691 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
636,108 | 688,095 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,134,962 | $ | 1,169,356 | ||||
Note 7. Borrowings
The following schedule details the Companys Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings and other
indebtedness at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | 200,835 | $ | 275,888 | ||||
Subordinated debt |
15,464 | 15,464 | ||||||
Other long-term debt |
421 | 564 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 216,720 | $ | 291,916 | ||||
FHLB borrowings include $200.00 million in convertible and callable advances and $835 thousand of
noncallable term advances from the FHLB at September 30, 2008. The weighted average interest rate
of advances was 3.24% and 4.38% at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Company has entered into a derivative interest rate swap instrument where it receives
LIBOR-based variable interest payments and pays fixed interest payments. The notional amount of
the derivative swap is $50.00 million and effectively fixes a
-12-
Table of Contents
portion of the FHLB borrowings at
approximately 4.34%. After considering the effect of the interest rate swap, the effective
weighted average interest rate of all FHLB borrowings was 3.74% at September 30, 2008. The fair
value of the interest rate swap was a liability of $1.42 million at September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2008, the FHLB advances have maturities between five and thirteen years. The
scheduled maturities of the advances are as follows:
(In Thousands) | Amount | |||
2008 |
$ | | ||
2009 |
| |||
2010 |
| |||
2011 |
| |||
2012 |
| |||
2013 and thereafter |
200,835 | |||
Total |
$ | 200,835 | ||
The callable advances may be redeemed at quarterly intervals after various lockout periods. These
call options may substantially shorten the lives of these instruments. If these advances are
called, the debt may be paid in full, converted to another FHLB credit product, or converted to a
fixed or adjustable rate advance. Prepayment of the advances may result in substantial penalties
based upon the differential between contractual note rates and current advance rates for similar
maturities. Advances from the FHLB are secured by stock in the FHLB of Atlanta, qualifying first
mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and certain other securities.
Also included in other indebtedness is $15.46 million of junior subordinated debentures (the
Debentures) issued by the Company in October 2003 to an unconsolidated trust subsidiary, FCBI
Capital Trust (the Trust), with an interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.95%. The Trust was
able to purchase the Debentures through the issuance of trust preferred securities which had
substantially identical terms as the Debentures. The Debentures mature on October 8, 2033, and are
callable beginning October 8, 2008.
The Company has committed to irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee the following payments or
distributions with respect to the preferred securities to the holders thereof to the extent that
the Trust has not made such payments or distributions: (i) accrued and unpaid distributions, (ii)
the redemption price, and (iii) upon a dissolution or termination of the trust, the lesser of the
liquidation amount and all accrued and unpaid distributions and the amount of assets of the trust
remaining available for distribution, in each case to the extent the Trust has funds available.
Note 8. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is the total of net income and other comprehensive income and loss. The
following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income and loss.
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,551 | $ | 7,316 | $ | 17,101 | $ | 21,879 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
(31,744 | ) | (2,055 | ) | (81,802 | ) | (9,723 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses
realized in net income |
(278 | ) | 52 | (1,628 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative securities |
(75 | ) | (1,095 | ) | (97 | ) | (620 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax effect |
12,839 | 1,239 | 33,411 | 4,148 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
(19,258 | ) | (1,859 | ) | (50,116 | ) | (6,222 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (14,707 | ) | $ | 5,457 | $ | (33,015 | ) | $ | 15,657 | ||||||
-13-
Table of Contents
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is a defendant in various legal actions and asserted
claims. While the Company and its legal counsel are unable to assess the ultimate outcome of each
of these matters with certainty, the resolution of these actions, singly or in the aggregate,
should not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company.
Note 10. Segment Information
The Company operates in two segments: Community Banking and Insurance Services. The Community
Banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and deposit services. This segment
provides customers with such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, business financing
and consumer loans. This segment also provides customers with several choices of deposit products
including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. In addition, the
Community Banking segment provides wealth management services to a broad range of customers. The
Insurance Services segment is a full-service insurance agency providing commercial and personal
lines of insurance.
The following table sets forth information about the reportable operating segments and
reconciliation of this information to the consolidated financial statements at and for the three-
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008.
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Community | Insurance | Parent/ | ||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Banking | Services | Elimination | Total | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 16,559 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (217 | ) | $ | 16,323 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,461 | | | 3,461 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
3,923 | 1,267 | 2,693 | 7,883 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
13,635 | 1,110 | (304 | ) | 14,441 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
3,386 | 138 | 2,780 | 6,304 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
962 | 41 | 750 | 1,753 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,424 | $ | 97 | $ | 2,030 | $ | 4,551 | ||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Community | Insurance | Parent/ | ||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Banking | Services | Elimination | Total | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 50,034 | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (696 | ) | $ | 49,308 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,721 | | | 4,721 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
18,561 | 3,757 | 2,430 | 24,748 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
43,473 | 3,147 | (1,137 | ) | 45,483 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
20,401 | 580 | 2,871 | 23,852 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
5,763 | 171 | 817 | 6,751 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,638 | $ | 409 | $ | 2,054 | $ | 17,101 | ||||||||
End of period assets |
$ | 1,938,358 | $ | 10,889 | $ | 18,210 | $ | 1,967,457 | ||||||||
Note 11: Fair Value Disclosures
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, (SFAS 157) for financial assets and financial liabilities. In accordance with
FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, the Company will delay application of FASB 157 for non-
financial assets and non-financial liabilities until January 1, 2009. In October of 2008, the
FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-3 ("FSP 157-3") to clarify the application
of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and to provide key considerations in
determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial
asset is not active. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements were not issued. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
-14-
Table of Contents
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value
measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the
principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most
advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal, or most advantageous,
market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for
transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for
a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and
customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction.
Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii)
knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact, and (iv) willing to transact.
SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the
income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant
information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and
liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash
flows or earnings, to a single present value amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is
based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset,
or the replacement cost. Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation
techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Inputs | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. |
Level 2 Inputs | Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, and credit risks, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means. |
Level 3 Inputs | Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well
as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth
below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Companys financial assets and
financial liabilities carried at fair value effective January 1, 2008.
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market
prices are not available, fair value is based upon third party models that primarily use, as
inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that
financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect
counterparty credit quality, the Companys creditworthiness, among other things, as well as
unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The
Companys valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative
of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the
Companys valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants,
the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial
instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities Available-for-Sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair
value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For Level 1 securities, the Company obtains fair value
measurements from active exchanges. For Level 2 securities, the Company obtains fair value
measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable
data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve,
live trading levels,
trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information, and the bonds terms
and conditions, among other things.
-15-
Table of Contents
Other Assets and Associated Liabilities. Securities held for trading purposes are recorded at fair
value and included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Securities held for
trading purposes include assets related to employee deferred compensation plans. The assets
associated with these plans are generally invested in equities and classified as Level 1. Deferred
compensation liabilities, also classified as Level 1, are carried at the fair value of the
obligation to the employee, which corresponds to the fair value of the invested assets.
Derivatives. Derivatives are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The Company obtains
dealer quotations based on observable data to value its derivatives.
Impaired Loans. Certain impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral
if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 3
inputs based on customized discounting criteria.
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within
the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
Fair Value Measurements Using | Total | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
$ | 6,348 | $ | 506,653 | $ | | $ | 513,001 | ||||||||
Other assets |
2,843 | | | 2,843 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
| 377 | | 377 | ||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,843 | | | 2,843 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
| 1,786 | | 1,786 |
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject
to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, for example, when there is evidence of
impairment. The fair value of loans considered impaired and collateral dependent was $5.98 million
at September 30, 2008.
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis include reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment
test. Certain non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a
goodwill impairment test, as well as intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets
measured at fair value for impairment assessment. As stated above, SFAS 157 will be applicable to
these fair value measurements beginning January 1, 2009.
Note 12: Subsequent Event
On October 27, 2008, the Company received approval from the U.S. Treasury Department (the
Treasury) to participate in the Capital Purchase Program developed by the Treasury Department
under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The terms of the program allow the Company to sell $42.50
million of cumulative, perpetual, non-voting, senior preferred stock, and warrants to purchase
common stock, to the Treasury. From the date of the approval, the Company has 30 days to execute
the requisite documents.
-16-
Table of Contents
PART I. ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following discussion and analysis is provided to address information about First Community
Bancshares, Inc.s (the Company) financial condition and results of operations. This discussion
and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and
the other financial information included in this report.
The Company is a multi-state financial holding company headquartered in Bluefield, Virginia, with
total assets of $1.97 billion at September 30, 2008. Through its community bank subsidiary, First
Community Bank, N. A. (the Bank), the Company provides financial, trust and investment advisory
services to individuals and commercial customers through more than fifty locations in Virginia,
West Virginia, North and South Carolina, and Tennessee. The Company is also the parent of
GreenPoint Insurance Group, Inc., a North Carolina-based full-service insurance agency offering
commercial and personal lines (GreenPoint). The Bank is the parent of Investment Planning
Consultants, Inc. (IPC), a SEC-registered investment advisory firm that offers wealth management
and investment advice. The Companys common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol, FCBC.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including
statements contained in its filings with the SEC (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
the Exhibits hereto and thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications which
are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to the Companys
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, anticipations, estimates and
intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based
on various factors (many of which are beyond the Companys control). The words may, could,
should, would, believe, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, plan, and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following factors, among
others, could cause the Companys financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in
such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the
strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations; the effects of, and
changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; inflation, interest rate, market and monetary
fluctuations; the timely development of competitive new products and services of the Company and
the acceptance of these products and services by new and existing customers; the willingness of
customers to substitute competitors products and services for the Companys products and services
and vice versa; the impact of changes in financial services laws and regulations (including laws
concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes; the effect of
acquisitions, including, without limitation, the failure to achieve the expected revenue growth
and/or expense savings from such acquisitions; the growth and profitability of the Companys
non-interest or fee income being less than expected; unanticipated regulatory or judicial
proceedings; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Company at
managing the risks involved in the foregoing.
The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company
does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be
made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company. These factors are described in greater
detail in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and conform to general practices within the banking
industry. The Companys financial position and results of operations are affected by managements
application of accounting policies, including judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues, expenses and related disclosures.
Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the
Companys consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.
Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary principally when assets and liabilities are
required to be recorded at estimated fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset carried on
the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded based upon the probability of
occurrence of a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in
more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation
adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are
provided by third party sources, when available. When third party information
-17-
Table of Contents
is not available, valuation adjustments are estimated by management primarily through the use of
internal modeling techniques and appraisal estimates.
The Companys accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation. The disclosures presented in the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and in Managements Discussion and Analysis provide
information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and
how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of
financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts,
management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses, accounting for
acquisitions and intangible assets, and accounting for income taxes as the accounting areas that
require the most subjective or complex judgments. The identified critical accounting policies are
described in detail in the Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except for the critical
accounting policy set forth below, there have been no material changes in the Companys critical
accounting policies since December 31, 2007.
Accounting for investment securities
Management performs an extensive review of the investment securities portfolio quarterly to
determine the cause of declines in the fair value of each security within each segment of the
portfolio. The Company uses inputs provided by an independent third party to determine the fair
values of its investment securities portfolio. Inputs provided by the third party are reviewed and
corroborated by management. Evaluations of the causes of the unrealized losses are performed to
determine whether the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary in nature. Considerations
such as the Companys intent and ability to hold the securities, recoverability of the invested
amounts over the Companys intended holding period, severity in pricing decline and receipt of
amounts contractually due, for example, are applied in determining whether a security is
other-than-temporarily impaired. If a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary,
the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.
The
impairment evaluations noted above are consistent with the accounting
guidance in EITF 99-20 Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in
Securitized Financial Assets, SFAS 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities, FASB Staff Position No. 115-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59,Other Than Temporary Impairment of
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, to
determine if a security is other than temporarily impaired. Securities deemed to be other
than temporarily impaired are written-down to their current fair values with a charge to earnings.
The review process uses a combination of the severity of pricing declines and the present
value of the expected cash flows and compares those results to the current carrying value.
Significant inputs provided by the independent third party such as default and loss severity
are reviewed internally for reasonableness and from a market
participants perspective.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company has not determined any of its investment securities to be
other than temporarily impaired.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
The Company is a financial holding company which operates within the five-state region of Virginia,
West Virginia, North and South Carolina, and Tennessee. The Company operates through the Bank,
IPC, and GreenPoint to offer a wide range of financial services. The Company reported total assets
of $1.97 billion at September 30, 2008.
The Company funds its lending activities primarily through the retail deposit operations of its
branch banking network. Retail and wholesale repurchase agreements and borrowings from the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) provide additional funding as needed. The Company invests its funds
primarily in loans to retail and commercial customers. In addition to loans, the Company invests a
portion of its funds in various debt securities, including those of United States agencies, state
and political subdivisions, and certain corporate notes and debt instruments. The Company also
maintains overnight interest-bearing balances with the FHLB and correspondent banks. The
difference between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities is the Companys
primary source of earnings. Net interest income is supplemented by fees for services, commissions
on sales, and various deposit service charges.
The Company also conducts asset management activities through the Banks Trust and Financial
Services Division (Trust Division) and its registered investment advisory firm, IPC. The Banks
Trust Division and IPC manage assets with an aggregate market value of $897 million. These assets
are not assets of the Company, but are managed under various fee-based arrangements as fiduciary or
agent.
-18-
Table of Contents
Recent Market Developments
The global and U.S. economies are experiencing significantly reduced business activity as a result
of, among other factors, disruptions in the financial system during the past year. Dramatic
declines in the housing market during the past year, with falling home prices and increasing
foreclosures and unemployment, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by
financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment
banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default
swaps and other derivative securities, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional
capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail.
In response to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets, Congress
passed, and President Bush signed, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the EESA) on
October 3, 2008. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Department of Treasury (Treasury) was granted
the authority to, among others, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed
securities and certain other financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of
stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets.
On October 14, 2008, Treasury announced the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program
(the Capital Purchase Program), under which it will purchase equity stakes in a wide variety of
banks and thrifts. Pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program, Treasury will make $250 billion of
capital available to U.S. financial institutions in the form of preferred stock. In conjunction
with the purchase of preferred stock, Treasury will receive warrants to purchase common stock with
an aggregate market price equal to 15% of the preferred investment. Participating financial
institutions will be required to adopt Treasurys standards for executive compensation and
corporate governance for the period during which Treasury holds equity issued under the Capital
Purchase Program. On October 27, 2008, the Company was notified by the Treasury that it was
preliminarily approved to participate in the Capital Purchase Program. The Companys participation
in the Capital Purchase Program, as well as the amount Treasury may invest, is subject to
Treasurys approval, the execution of definitive agreements, and standard closing conditions.
Additionally, on October 14, 2008, Treasury triggered the systemic risk exception to the FDIC Act,
enabling the FDIC to temporarily provide a 100% guarantee of the senior debt of all FDIC-insured
institutions and their holding companies, as well as deposits in non-interest bearing transaction
deposit accounts under a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). Coverage under the TLGP is
available for 30 days without charge and thereafter at a cost of 75 basis points per annum for
senior unsecured debt and 10 basis points per annum surcharge for non-interest bearing transaction
deposits in excess of $250,000 per account. The Company is currently evaluating its participation
in the TLGP.
It is presently unclear what impact the EESA, the CPP, the TLGP, other previously announced
liquidity and funding initiatives of the Federal Reserve and other agencies and any additional
programs that may be initiated in the future will have on the financial markets and the other
difficulties described above, or on the U.S. banking and financial industries and the broader U.S.
and global economies. Further adverse effects could have an adverse impact on the Company and its
business.
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND BRANCHING ACTIVITY
In July 2008, the Company announced its proposed acquisition of Coddle Creek Financial Corp.
(Coddle Creek) headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina. Coddle Creek is the bank holding
company for Mooresville Savings Bank, SSB (Mooresville Savings), a state-chartered savings bank
providing deposit and loan services in Mooresville, Huntersville, and Cornelius, North Carolina
(the Lake Norman region just north of Charlotte, North Carolina). At June 30, 2008, Coddle Creek
had total assets of $158.60 million, loans of $133.71 million, deposits of $136.97 million and
stockholders equity of $19.09 million.
Pursuant to the terms of the definitive merger agreement, Coddle Creek will merge with and into the
Company. Immediately thereafter, Mooresville Savings will be merged with and into the Bank and
operate under the name, identity, and branch network of First Community Bank, N. A. Stockholders
of Coddle Creek will receive merger consideration of $19.60 per share and 0.9046 shares of the
Companys common stock for each outstanding share of Coddle Creek common stock. The merger
transaction is valued at approximately $33.01 million, based on the Companys closing price of
$35.83 on July 31, 2008. The value of the transaction and value of each share of Coddle Creek
common stock on consummation of the merger may be higher or lower depending on the value of the
Companys common stock on such date. The transaction has received the required regulatory
approvals or waivers and been approved by the stockholders of Coddle Creek. The merger is expected
to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The proposed acquisition of Mooresville Savings represents the Companys continued expansion into
targeted suburban markets as part of its strategic plan for growth of the franchise in desirable
markets in and near important MSAs in the Mid-Atlantic and
-19-
Table of Contents
Southeast United States. The Company expects to substantially expand customer offerings, support
technologies, and delivery channels to enhance the existing core business of Mooresville Savings.
In September 2007, the Company acquired GreenPoint, a High Point, North Carolina, insurance agency.
In connection with the initial payment of approximately $1.66 million, the Company issued 49,088
shares of its common stock. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, former shareholders
of GreenPoint are entitled to additional consideration aggregating up to $1.45 million in the form
of cash or the Companys common stock, valued at the time of issuance, if certain future operating
performance targets are met. If those operating targets are met, the value of the consideration
ultimately paid will be added to the cost of the acquisition, which will increase the amount of
goodwill related to the acquisition. The Company assumed $5.57 million debt in connection with the
acquisition, of which approximately $5.00 million was retired at closing. In March 2008, the
Company issued 7,728 additional shares in connection with the acquisition, resulting in a goodwill
adjustment of approximately $267 thousand. In July 2008, GreenPoint acquired REL Insurance Agency
for $1.08 million in an all cash transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, the former
principal of REL is entitled to additional consideration aggregating up to $720 thousand, if
certain operating targets are met. The acquisition and activity of GreenPoint has added a total
$9.86 million of goodwill and intangibles.
The Company opened a new branch location in Summersville, West Virginia, in May 2008. In December
2007, the Company opened two new locations in the Richmond, Virginia, area. In November and
October 2007, the Company opened a new branch location in Princeton and Daniels, West Virginia,
respectively. In March 2007, the Company opened two new branch locations in the Winston-Salem,
North Carolina, area.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008, was $4.55 million, or $0.42 per basic
share and $0.41 per diluted share, compared with $7.32 million, or $0.65 per basic and diluted
share, for the three months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of $2.77 million, or 37.79%.
Return on average assets was 0.90% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared with
1.34% for the same period in 2007. Return on average equity for the three months ended September
30, 2008, was 9.39% compared with 13.31% for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was $17.10 million, or $1.56 per basic
share and $1.54 per diluted share, compared with $21.88 million, or $1.95 per basic share and $1.94
per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of $4.78 million, or
21.84%. Return on average assets was 1.12% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared
with 1.38% for the same period in 2007. Return on average equity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, was 11.09% compared with 13.40% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Net Interest Income Quarterly Comparison (See Table I)
Net interest income, the largest contributor to earnings, was $16.32 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, compared with $17.14 million for the corresponding period in 2007, a
decrease of $820 thousand, or 4.78%. Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $17.26 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $1.02 million from $18.28 million for the
third quarter of 2007. The decrease in net interest income was due primarily to decreases in loan
and investment balances and those yields as a result of the precipitous declines in benchmark
interest rates, including the New York Prime Rate, during the last nine months.
Compared with the third quarter of 2007, average earning assets decreased $199.96 million while
interest-bearing liabilities decreased $124.63 million during the three months ended September 30,
2008. The yield on average earning assets decreased by 64 basis points to 6.22% from 6.86% between
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total cost of interest-bearing
liabilities decreased 105 basis points between the third quarters of 2007 and 2008, which resulted
in a net interest rate spread that was 41 basis points higher at 3.64% for the third quarter of
2008 compared with 3.23% for the same period last year. The Companys tax-equivalent net interest
margin of 3.90% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, increased 20 basis points from 3.70%
for the same period of 2007.
The rate earned on loans decreased 95 basis points to 6.53% from 7.48% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effect of the cuts in the target federal funds rate
by the Federal Open Market Committee and the associated decline in the Prime rate had a profound
impact on loan yields throughout 2008. Declines in the average portfolio balances also contributed
to a net decrease of $4.21 million, or 17.92%, in tax-equivalent loan interest income for the third
quarter of 2008 compared with the third quarter of 2007.
-20-
Table of Contents
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the tax-equivalent yield on available-for-sale
securities decreased 21 basis points to 5.58%, while the average balance decreased by $93.15
million, or 13.98%, compared with the same period in 2007. The average tax-equivalent yield
decreased due to the large portion of variable rate securities in the portfolio. The average
balance of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio continued to decline as securities matured or
were called and were not replaced.
Compared with the third quarter of 2007, average interest-bearing balances with banks decreased to
$1.44 million during the third quarter of 2008, as the yield decreased 228 basis points to 2.50%
during the same period. Interest-bearing balances with banks is comprised largely of excess
liquidity bearing overnight market rates. The rate earned on these overnight balances during the
third quarter of 2008 decreased along with decreases in short-term benchmark interest rates.
Compared with the same period in 2007, the average balances of interest-bearing demand deposits
increased $33.31 million, or 22.92%, while the average rate paid during the third quarter of 2008
decreased by 16 basis points. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the average
balances of savings deposits decreased $35.50 million, or 10.29%, while the average rate paid
decreased 89 basis points compared to the same period in 2007. Average time deposits decreased
$66.14 million, or 9.47%, while the average rate paid on time deposits decreased 105 basis points
from 4.47% in the third quarter of 2007 to 3.42% in the third quarter of 2008. Retail repurchase
agreements, which consist of collateralized retail deposits and commercial treasury accounts,
decreased $23.65 million, or 13.62%, to $149.98 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008, while the rate decreased 152 basis points to 1.94% during the same period. The level of
average non-interest-bearing demand deposits decreased $18.30 million, or 7.97%, to $211.16 million
during the quarter ended September 30, 2008, compared with the corresponding period of the prior
year.
Compared with the same period in 2007, average federal funds purchased increased $41.95 million to
$42.70 million during the third quarter of 2008. Average federal funds purchased increased as a
$50.00 million FHLB advance paying 3.64% was called in June 2008, and the Company borrowed
overnight at a significant savings. Wholesale repurchase agreements remained unchanged at $50.00
million, while the rate decreased 131 basis points between the two periods. The average balance of
FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt decreased by $74.61 million, or 25.60%, in the third
quarter of 2008 to $216.79 million, while the rate paid on those borrowings decreased 67 basis
points.
Net Interest Income Year-to-Date Comparison (See Table II)
Net interest income was $49.31 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared with
$51.17 million for the corresponding period in 2007, a decrease of $1.86 million, or 3.64%.
Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $52.48 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of $2.05 million from $54.53 million for the first nine months of 2007. The
decrease in net interest income was due primarily to decreases in loan balances and in loan yields
as a result of the precipitous declines in benchmark interest rates, including the New York Prime
Rate, during the last twelve months.
Compared with the first nine months of 2007, average earning assets decreased $97.86 million while
interest-bearing liabilities decreased $39.46 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The yield on average earning assets decreased by 52 basis points to 6.39% from 6.91% between
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total cost of interest-bearing
liabilities decreased 74 basis points between the first nine months of 2007 and 2008, which
resulted in a net interest rate spread that was 22 basis points higher at 3.54% for the first nine
months of 2008 compared with 3.32% for the same period last year. The Companys tax-equivalent net
interest margin of 3.87% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, increased six basis points
from 3.81% for the same period of 2007.
The rate earned on loans decreased 70 basis points to 6.80% from 7.50% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effect of the cuts in the target federal funds rate
by the Federal Open Market Committee and the associated decline in the Prime rate had a profound
impact on loan yields in the first nine months of 2008. Declines in the average portfolio balances
also contributed to a net decrease of $9.99 million, or 14.18%, in tax-equivalent loan interest
income for the first nine months of 2008 compared with the first nine months of 2007.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the tax-equivalent yield on available-for-sale
securities decreased 15 basis points to 5.61%, while the average balance decreased by $6.97
million, or 1.14%, compared with the same period in 2007. The average tax-equivalent yield
decreased due to the large portion of variable-rate securities in the portfolio. The average
balance of the held-to-maturity securities portfolio continued to decline as securities matured or
were called and were not replaced.
-21-
Table of Contents
Compared with the first nine months of 2007, average interest-bearing balances with banks decreased
to $12.36 million during the first nine months of 2008, as the yield decreased 202 basis points to
2.81% during the same period. Interest-bearing balances with banks is comprised largely of excess
liquidity bearing overnight market rates. The rate earned on these overnight balances during the
first nine months of 2008 decreased along with decreases in short-term benchmark interest rates.
Compared with the same period in 2007, the average balances of interest-bearing demand deposits
increased $25.38 million, or 17.35%, while the average rate paid during the first nine months of
2008 decreased 15 basis points. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, average savings
deposits decreased $14.95 million, or 4.53%, while the rate paid was 1.63%, a 61 basis point
decrease from the first nine months of 2007. Average time deposits decreased $51.72 million, or
7.39%, while the average rate paid on time deposits decreased 63 basis points from 4.44% in the
first nine months of 2007 to 3.81% in the first nine months of 2008. Retail repurchase agreements,
which consist of collateralized retail deposits and commercial treasury accounts, decreased $16.05
million, or 9.60%, to $151.11 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, while the rate
decreased 130 basis points to 2.25% during the same period. The level of average
non-interest-bearing demand deposits decreased $17.25 million, or 7.46%, to $213.93 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared with the corresponding period of the prior year.
Compared with the same period in 2007, average federal funds purchased increased $12.79 million to
$18.24 million during the first nine months of 2008, and wholesale repurchase agreements remained
unchanged at $50.00 million, while the rate decreased 153 basis points between the two periods.
The average balance of FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt increased by $5.09 million, or
2.06%, in the first nine months of 2008 to $252.52 million, while the rate paid on those borrowings
decreased 65 basis points. The Company prepaid a $25.00 million FHLB advance during the first nine
months of 2008. The advance carried an interest rate of 5.47% and was extinguished using current
liquidity. A $50.00 million advance paying 3.64% was also called in June 2008.
-22-
Table of Contents
Table I
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) |
$ | 1,174,855 | $ | 19,286 | 6.53 | % | $ | 1,246,530 | $ | 23,497 | 7.48 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
573,046 | 8,035 | 5.58 | % | 666,199 | 9,715 | 5.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities held to maturity |
9,559 | 161 | 6.70 | % | 12,591 | 254 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
1,435 | 9 | 2.50 | % | 33,538 | 404 | 4.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets |
1,758,895 | 27,491 | 6.22 | % | 1,958,858 | 33,870 | 6.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
242,296 | 212,178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 2,001,191 | $ | 2,171,036 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 178,632 | $ | 73 | 0.16 | % | $ | 145,324 | $ | 119 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
309,364 | 1,172 | 1.51 | % | 344,866 | 2,088 | 2.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
632,142 | 5,439 | 3.42 | % | 698,280 | 7,876 | 4.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,120,138 | 6,684 | 2.37 | % | 1,188,470 | 10,083 | 3.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
42,702 | 251 | 2.34 | % | 751 | 10 | 5.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Retail repurchase agreements |
149,984 | 730 | 1.94 | % | 173,630 | 1,516 | 3.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale repurchase agreements |
50,000 | 389 | 3.10 | % | 50,000 | 556 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other indebtedness |
216,789 | 2,173 | 3.99 | % | 291,394 | 3,424 | 4.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
459,475 | 3,543 | 3.07 | % | 515,775 | 5,506 | 4.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,579,613 | 10,227 | 2.58 | % | 1,704,245 | 15,589 | 3.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interestbearing demand deposits |
211,155 | 229,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
17,680 | 19,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
192,743 | 218,049 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 2,001,191 | $ | 2,171,666 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income, Tax Equivalent |
$ | 17,264 | $ | 18,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Rate Spread (3) |
3.64 | % | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Margin (4) |
3.90 | % | 3.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) at the rate of 35%. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefits of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory rate of 35% for each period presented. The Company believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. | |
(2) | Non-accrual loans are included in average balances outstanding but with no related interest income during the period of non-accrual. | |
(3) | Represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and cost of funds. | |
(4) | Represents tax equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. |
-23-
Table of Contents
Table II
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) |
$ | 1,187,006 | $ | 60,456 | 6.80 | % | $ | 1,255,209 | $ | 70,445 | 7.50 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
602,802 | 25,310 | 5.61 | % | 609,772 | 26,267 | 5.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities held to maturity |
10,849 | 675 | 8.31 | % | 16,171 | 965 | 7.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
12,363 | 260 | 2.81 | % | 29,726 | 1,073 | 4.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets |
1,813,020 | 86,701 | 6.39 | % | 1,910,878 | 98,750 | 6.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
232,933 | 203,831 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 2,045,953 | $ | 2,114,709 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 171,661 | $ | 213 | 0.17 | % | $ | 146,283 | $ | 349 | 0.32 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
314,903 | 3,847 | 1.63 | % | 329,854 | 5,537 | 2.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
648,282 | 18,483 | 3.81 | % | 700,006 | 23,245 | 4.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,134,846 | 22,543 | 2.65 | % | 1,176,143 | 29,131 | 3.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
18,241 | 330 | 2.42 | % | 5,447 | 229 | 5.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Retail repurchase agreements |
151,107 | 2,540 | 2.25 | % | 167,154 | 4,441 | 3.55 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale repurchase agreements |
50,000 | 1,077 | 2.88 | % | 50,000 | 1,651 | 4.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other indebtedness |
252,520 | 7,732 | 4.09 | % | 247,428 | 8,773 | 4.74 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
471,868 | 11,679 | 3.31 | % | 470,029 | 15,094 | 4.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,606,714 | 34,222 | 2.85 | % | 1,646,172 | 44,225 | 3.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interestbearing demand deposits |
213,934 | 231,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
19,326 | 19,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity |
205,979 | 218,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 2,045,953 | $ | 2,114,709 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income, Tax Equivalent |
$ | 52,479 | $ | 54,525 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Rate Spread (3) |
3.54 | % | 3.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Margin (4) |
3.87 | % | 3.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Fully Taxable Equivalent (FTE) at the rate of 35%. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefits of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory rate of 35% for each period presented. The Company believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. | |
(2) | Non-accrual loans are included in average balances outstanding but with no related interest income during the period of non-accrual. | |
(3) | Represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and cost of funds. | |
(4) | Represents tax equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. |
-24-
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the changes in tax-equivalent interest earned and paid resulting
from changes in the volume of earning assets and paying liabilities and changes in their interest
rates. The changes in interest due to both rate and volume have been allocated to the volume and
rate columns in proportion to dollar amounts.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to 2007 | Compared to 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ Increase/(Decrease) due to | $ Increase/(Decrease) due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Earned On: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) |
$ | (1,314 | ) | $ | (2,897 | ) | $ | (4,211 | ) | $ | (3,676 | ) | $ | (6,313 | ) | $ | (9,989 | ) | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale (1) |
(1,337 | ) | (343 | ) | (1,680 | ) | (291 | ) | (666 | ) | (957 | ) | ||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity (1) |
(55 | ) | (38 | ) | (93 | ) | (332 | ) | 42 | (290 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks |
(263 | ) | (132 | ) | (395 | ) | (474 | ) | (339 | ) | (813 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
(2,969 | ) | (3,410 | ) | (6,379 | ) | (4,773 | ) | (7,276 | ) | (12,049 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest Paid On: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
39 | (85 | ) | (46 | ) | 77 | (213 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
(198 | ) | (718 | ) | (916 | ) | (241 | ) | (1,449 | ) | (1,690 | ) | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
(700 | ) | (1,738 | ) | (2,438 | ) | (1,628 | ) | (3,134 | ) | (4,762 | ) | ||||||||||||
Fed funds purchased |
243 | (2 | ) | 241 | 133 | (32 | ) | 101 | ||||||||||||||||
Retail repurchase agreements |
(185 | ) | (600 | ) | (785 | ) | (393 | ) | (1,508 | ) | (1,901 | ) | ||||||||||||
Wholesale repurchase agreements |
| (167 | ) | (167 | ) | | (574 | ) | (574 | ) | ||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt |
(799 | ) | (452 | ) | (1,251 | ) | 184 | (1,225 | ) | (1,041 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
(1,600 | ) | (3,762 | ) | (5,362 | ) | (1,868 | ) | (8,135 | ) | (10,003 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in net interest income,
tax-equivalent |
$ | (1,369 | ) | $ | 352 | $ | (1,017 | ) | $ | (2,905 | ) | $ | 859 | $ | (2,046 | ) | ||||||||
(1) | Fully taxable equivalent using a rate of 35%. |
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
There was significant disruption and volatility in the financial and capital markets during the
second half of 2007 and the first nine months of 2008. Turmoil in the mortgage market adversely
impacted both domestic and global markets, resulting in a credit and liquidity crisis. The
disruption has been exacerbated by significant declines in valuations within the real estate and
housing markets. Decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used
as collateral for loans, including loans originated by the Company. Adverse changes in the economy
may have a negative effect on the ability of the Companys borrowers to make timely loan payments,
which would have an adverse impact on the Companys earnings. A further increase in loan
delinquencies could adversely impact loan loss experience, causing potential increases in the
provision and allowance for loan losses.
-25-
Table of Contents
The allowance for loan losses was $14.51 million at September 30, 2008, $12.83 million at December
31, 2007 and $13.19 million at September 30, 2007. The Companys allowance for loan loss activity
for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, is as follows:
For the Three Months Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 13,433 | $ | 13,934 | $ | 12,833 | $ | 14,549 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,461 | | 4,721 | | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(2,601 | ) | (1,009 | ) | (4,765 | ) | (2,813 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
217 | 265 | 1,721 | 1,454 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(2,384 | ) | (744 | ) | (3,044 | ) | (1,359 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 14,510 | $ | 13,190 | $ | 14,510 | $ | 13,190 | ||||||||
The total allowance for loan losses to loans held for investment ratio was 1.24% at September 30,
2008, compared with 1.05% at December 31, 2007, and 1.06% at September 30, 2007. Management
considers the allowance adequate based upon its analysis of the portfolio as of September 30, 2008.
However, no assurances can be made that future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will
not be necessary as a result of increases in non-performing loans and other factors.
Throughout the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company had net charge-offs of
$2.38 million and $3.04 million, respectively, compared with $744 thousand and $1.36 million in the
respective periods of 2007. Annualized net charge-offs for the third quarter and first nine months
of 2008 were 0.81% and 0.34%, respectively. The Company made provisions for loan losses of $3.46
million and $4.72 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, respectively. No
provision was required in the respective periods of 2007.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income consists of all revenues that are not included in interest and fee income
related to earning assets. Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2008 was $7.88 million
compared with $6.02 million in the same period of 2007, an increase of $1.86 million, or 30.95%.
Wealth management revenues increased $49 thousand, or 5.40%, to $957 thousand for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, compared with the same period in 2007. Service charges on deposit
accounts increased $802 thousand, or 26.68%, to $3.81 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008, compared with the same period in 2007. The strong increase in deposit service charges
reflects the continuing success of new retail programs and initiatives implemented in 2007, which
have positively impacted account service charges and new account openings. Other service charges,
commissions, and fees increased $138 thousand, or 15.30%, to $1.04 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, compared with the same period in 2007. Increases include higher levels
of ATM service charges and electronic interchange income. Insurance commissions for the third
quarter of 2008 were $1.24 million. Other operating income was $675 thousand for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $479 thousand, or 41.51%, compared with the same period in
2007. During the third quarter of 2008, securities gains of $163 thousand were realized, compared
with a gain of $50 thousand in the comparable period in 2007.
Noninterest income for the first nine months of 2008 was $24.75 million compared with $16.78
million in the same period of 2007, an increase of $7.97 million, or 47.47%. Wealth management
revenues increased $23 thousand, or 0.78%, to $2.95 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, compared with the same period in 2007. Wealth management revenues were slightly elevated in
2007 as the Trust Division settled several large estates. Service charges on deposit accounts
increased $2.29 million, or 28.39%, to $10.37 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
compared with the same period in 2007. The strong increase in deposit service charges reflects the
continuing success of new retail programs and initiatives implemented in 2007, which have
positively impacted account service charges and new account openings. Other service charges,
commissions, and fees increased $616 thousand, or 23.61%, to $3.23 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, compared with the same period in 2007. Deposit service charges
and other service charges and commissions reflect the year-to-date impact of the previously
discussed retail program changes. Insurance commissions for the first nine months of 2008 were
$3.73 million. Other operating income was $2.34 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of $620 thousand, or 20.97%, compared with the same period in 2007. During the
first nine months of 2008, securities gains of $2.13 million were realized compared with a gain of
$209 thousand in the comparable period in 2007. During the first quarter of 2008, certain
investment securities in the Companys portfolio significantly increased in value following the
passage of a one-time call opportunity, and as the interest rate environment declined, the Company
elected to monetize that value.
-26-
Table of Contents
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense totaled $14.44 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, an increase of
$1.61 million, or 12.50%, from the same period in 2007. Salaries and benefits for the first
quarter of 2008 increased $827 thousand, or 12.64%, compared to the same period in 2007. Salaries
and benefits at GreenPoint accounted for $687 thousand of the increase in the third quarter of 2008
over the prior third quarter. Increases in retirement plan accruals, incentive compensation
accruals, and commissions expense made up the remainder of the increase. Other non-interest
expense totaled $4.68 million for the third quarter of 2008, an increase of $273 thousand, or
6.19%, from $4.41 million for the third quarter of 2007. The increase between comparable periods
is due mostly to increases in consulting expense, new account promotions, and legal expenses.
Occupancy and furniture and fixtures expenses increased between the comparable periods with the
addition of GreenPoint and the new branches.
Noninterest expense totaled $45.48 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an
increase of $8.41 million, or 22.70%, from the same period in 2007. Salaries and benefits for the
first nine months of 2008 increased $3.62 million, or 18.94%, compared to the same period in 2007.
Salaries and benefits at GreenPoint accounted for $1.90 million of the increase in the first nine
months of 2008 over the prior year. Increases in retirement plan accruals, incentive compensation
accruals, and commissions expense made up the remainder of the increase. Included in noninterest
expense for the first nine months of 2008 is a prepayment penalty of $1.65 million incurred in
connection with the early payment of a $25.00 million FHLB advance. Other non-interest expense
totaled $14.10 million for the first nine months of 2008, an increase of $1.92 million, or 15.74%,
from $12.18 million for the first nine months of 2007. The increase between comparable periods is
due mostly to increases in legal and consulting expense and new account promotions. Occupancy and
furniture and fixtures expenses increased between the comparable periods with the addition of
GreenPoint and the new branches.
In October 2008, the FDIC announced its intention to seek an increase in deposit insurance premiums
that, beginning in 2009, would effectively double the average insurance premiums paid by depository
institutions, such as the Bank, to ensure that the deposit insurance fund can adequately cover
projected losses from future bank failures. At this time, the Company cannot provide any assurance
as to the amount of any projected increase in its deposit insurance premium rate, should such an
increase occur, as such changes are dependent upon a variety of factors, some of which are beyond
the Companys control.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense is comprised of federal and state current and deferred income taxes on pre-tax
earnings of the Company. Income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income may vary significantly
from statutory rates due to items of income and expense which are excluded, by law, from the
calculation of taxable income. These items are commonly referred to as permanent differences. The
most significant permanent differences for the Company include income on state and municipal
securities which are exempt from federal income tax, certain dividend payments which are deductible
by the Company, and tax credits generated by investments in low income housing and historic
rehabilitations.
For the third quarter of 2008, income taxes were $1.75 million compared with $3.01 million for the
third quarter of 2007. For the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the effective tax rates
were 27.81% and 29.16%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income taxes
were $6.75 million compared with $9.01 million for the same period in 2007. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the effective tax rates were 28.30% and 29.16%, respectively.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets at September 30, 2008, decreased $182.38 million, or 8.48%, to $1.97 billion from
December 31, 2007. The decline reflects declining securities portfolio valuations, continued loan
payoffs, and managed attrition of high-rate deposit, single-service households.
Securities
Available-for-sale securities were $513.00 million at September 30, 2008, compared with $664.12
million at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $151.12 million, or 22.75%. Held-to-maturity
securities declined to $9.04 million at September 30, 2008, compared with $12.08 million at
December 31, 2007.
For a more detailed discussion of the Companys investment portfolio, refer to footnote 3 to the
September 30, 2008, financial statements in Part 1, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
-27-
Table of Contents
Loan Portfolio
Loans Held for Sale: The $140 thousand balance of loans held for sale at September 30, 2008,
represents mortgage loans that are sold to investors on a best efforts basis. Accordingly, the
Company does not retain the interest rate risk involved in the commitment. The gross notional
amount of outstanding commitments at September 30, 2008, was $4.36 million on 33 loans.
Loans Held for Investment: Total loans held for investment were $1.17 billion at September 30,
2008, representing declines of $57.22 million and $70.92 million from December 31 and September 30,
2007, respectively. The average loan to deposit ratio decreased to 88.25% for the third quarter of
2008, compared with 88.49% for the fourth quarter of 2007 and 87.91% for the third quarter of 2007.
Year-to-date average loans of $1.19 billion decreased $68.20 million when compared with the first
nine months of 2007 average of $1.26 billion.
Over the course of the last three years, the Company has taken measures to tighten its commercial
underwriting standards. The more stringent underwriting has led to improved credit quality, but,
coupled with a reduced complement of commercial loan officers, has resulted in decreases in the
loan portfolio. The Company also continues to realize net payoffs in the area of consumer finance,
as it competes with credit card lenders and captive automobile finance companies.
The held for investment loan portfolio continues to be diversified among loan types and industry
segments. The following table presents the various loan categories and changes in composition as
of September 30, 2008, December 31, 2007, and September 30, 2007.
September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | September 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans Held for Investment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and agricultural |
$ | 83,271 | 7.13 | % | $ | 96,261 | 7.85 | % | $ | 94,168 | 7.60 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
386,287 | 33.06 | % | 386,112 | 31.51 | % | 396,147 | 31.97 | % | |||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
498,721 | 42.69 | % | 498,345 | 40.66 | % | 500,760 | 40.41 | % | |||||||||||||||
Construction |
127,076 | 10.88 | % | 163,310 | 13.33 | % | 167,089 | 13.48 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
66,333 | 5.68 | % | 75,447 | 6.16 | % | 77,724 | 6.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other |
6,598 | 0.56 | % | 6,027 | 0.49 | % | 3,319 | 0.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,168,286 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,225,502 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,239,207 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans Held for Sale |
$ | 140 | $ | 811 | $ | 2,294 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on non-accrual status, loans contractually past due 90 days or
more and still accruing interest, and other real estate owned (OREO). Non-performing assets were
$7.89 million at September 30, 2008, $3.47 million at December 31, 2007, and $3.08 million at
September 30, 2007. The increase in non-performing assets stems largely
from the addition of one loan relationship in the Richmond, Virginia, market. Those loans have
been appropriately reserved for based on managements analysis of potential impairment. The
percentage of non-performing assets to total loans and OREO was 0.68% at September 30, 2008, 0.28%
at December 31, 2007, and 0.25% at September 30, 2007.
-28-
Table of Contents
The following schedule details non-performing assets by category at the close of each of the
quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and December 31, 2007.
September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | ||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | |||||||||
Non-accrual |
$ | 6,997 | $ | 2,923 | $ | 2,869 | ||||||
Ninety days past due and accruing |
| | | |||||||||
Other real estate owned |
896 | 545 | 211 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 7,893 | $ | 3,468 | $ | 3,080 | ||||||
Ongoing activity within the classification and categories of non-performing loans includes
collections on delinquencies, foreclosures and movements into or out of the non-performing
classification as a result of changing customer business conditions. OREO was $896 thousand at
September 30, 2008, and is carried at the lesser of estimated net realizable value or cost.
Deposits and Other Borrowings
Total deposits decreased by $43.90 million, or 3.15%, during the first nine months of 2008. Non
interest-bearing demand deposits decreased $9.51 million to $214.58 million at September 30, 2008,
compared with $224.09 million at December 31, 2007. Interest-bearing demand deposits increased
$32.83 million to $186.40 million at September 30, 2008. Savings decreased $15.24 million, or
4.65%, and time deposits decreased $51.99 million, or 7.56%, during the first nine months of 2008.
Throughout most of the last twelve months, the Company has aggressively lowered money market and
certificate of deposit rates, which is the primary cause of the decreases in deposits.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements decreased $27.04 million, or 13.04%, in the first nine
months of 2008 to $180.39 million. There were $29.50 million in federal funds purchased
outstanding at September 30, 2008. Overnight balances increased as the Company replaced high-cost
term advances with low-cost, short-term funds.
Stockholders Equity
Total stockholders equity decreased $46.29 million, or 21.32%, from $217.10 million at December
31, 2007, to $170.81 million at September 30, 2008, as the Company pursued its stock repurchase
program and experienced increases in other comprehensive losses associated with the Companys
investment portfolio. The change in equity was the result of net earnings of $17.10 million, less
dividends paid to stockholders of $9.23 million, common stock repurchases of $4.22 million, and
other comprehensive loss of $50.12 million.
The Company repurchased 132,100 shares of its common stock in the first nine months of 2008. The
share repurchases were conducted as part of a share repurchase plan previously adopted by the
Company.
Risk-Based Capital
Risk-based capital guidelines promulgated by federal banking agencies weight balance sheet assets
and off-balance sheet commitments based on inherent risks associated with the respective asset
types. At September 30, 2008, the Companys total capital
to risk-weighted assets ratio was 13.30%
compared with 12.34% at December 31, 2007. The Companys Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
ratio was 12.23% at September 30, 2008, compared with 11.45% at December 31, 2007. The Companys
Tier 1 leverage ratio at September 30, 2008, was 8.68% compared with 8.09% at December 31, 2007.
All of the Companys regulatory capital ratios exceed the current well-capitalized levels.
-29-
Table of Contents
PART I. ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2008, the Company maintained liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalent
balances of $53.24 million, unpledged securities available-for-sale of $141.27 million, and total
FHLB credit availability of approximately $57.89 million. Cash and cash equivalents as well as
advances from the FHLB are immediately available for satisfaction of deposit withdrawals, customer
credit needs and operations of the Company. Investment securities available-for-sale represent a
secondary level of liquidity available for conversion to liquid funds in the event of extraordinary
needs. The Company also maintains approved lines of credit with correspondent banks as backup
liquidity sources.
The Company maintains a liquidity policy as a means to manage liquidity and the associated risk.
The policy includes a Liquidity Contingency Plan (the Liquidity Plan) that is designed as a tool
for the Company to detect liquidity issues promptly in order to protect depositors, creditors and
shareholders. The Liquidity Plan includes monitoring various internal and external indicators such
as changes in core deposits and changes in market conditions. It provides for timely responses to a
wide variety of funding scenarios ranging from changes in loan demand to a decline in the Companys
quarterly earnings to a decline in the market price of the Companys stock. The Liquidity Plan
calls for specific responses designed to meet a wide range of liquidity needs based upon
assessments on a recurring basis by the Company and its Board of Directors.
Interest Rate Risk and Asset/Liability Management
The Companys profitability is dependent to a large extent upon its net interest income, which is
the difference between its interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and
securities, and its interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to
the degree that interest-earning assets reprice differently than interest-bearing liabilities. The
Company manages its mix of assets and liabilities with the goals of limiting its exposure to
interest rate risk, ensuring adequate liquidity, and coordinating its sources and uses of funds
while maintaining an acceptable level of net interest income given the current interest rate
environment.
The Companys primary component of operational revenue, net interest income, is subject to
variation as a result of changes in interest rate environments in conjunction with unbalanced
repricing opportunities on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate risk has
four primary components: repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and option risk. Repricing
risk occurs when earning assets and paying liabilities reprice at differing times as interest rates
change. Basis risk occurs when the underlying rates on the assets and liabilities the institution
holds change at different levels or in varying degrees. Yield curve risk is the risk of adverse
consequences as a result of unequal changes in the spread between two or more rates for different
maturities for the same instrument. Lastly, option risk is due to embedded options, often put or
call options, given or sold to holders of financial instruments.
In order to mitigate the effect of changes in the general level of interest rates, the Company
manages repricing opportunities and thus, its interest rate sensitivity. The Company seeks to
control its interest rate risk exposure to insulate net interest income and net earnings from
fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. To measure its exposure to interest rate
risk, quarterly simulations of net interest income are performed using financial models that
project net interest income through a range of possible interest rate environments including
rising, declining, most likely and flat rate scenarios. The simulation model used by the Company
captures all earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and all off-balance sheet financial
instruments and combines the various factors affecting rate sensitivity into an earnings outlook.
The results of these simulations indicate the existence and severity of interest rate risk in each
of those rate environments based upon the current balance sheet position, assumptions as to changes
in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-paying liabilities and the Companys
estimate of yields to be attained in those future rate environments and rates that will be paid on
various deposit instruments and borrowings. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a
result, the model cannot precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net
interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and
frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and the Companys
strategies. However, the earnings simulation model is currently the best tool available to the
Company for managing interest rate risk.
Specific strategies for management of interest rate risk have included shortening the amortized
maturity of new fixed-rate loans, increasing the volume of adjustable-rate loans to reduce the
average maturity of the Companys interest-earning assets, and monitoring the term and structure of
liabilities to maintain a balanced mix of maturity and repricing structures to mitigate potential
exposure. At September 20, 2008, net interest income modeling shows the Company to be in a
slightly asset-sensitive position. Additionally, structure in the Companys assets and liabilities
creates a situation where net interest income decreases in a sustained increasing rate environment.
-30-
Table of Contents
The Company has established policy limits for tolerance of interest rate risk that allow for no
more than a 10% reduction in projected net interest income for the next twelve months based on a
comparison of net interest income simulations in various interest rate scenarios. In addition, the
policy addresses exposure limits to changes in the economic value of equity according to predefined
policy guidelines. The most recent simulation indicates that current exposure to interest rate
risk is within the Companys defined policy limits.
The following table summarizes the projected impact on the next twelve months net interest income
and the economic value of equity as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, of immediate and
sustained rate shocks in the interest rate environments of plus and minus 100 and 200 basis points
from the base simulation, assuming no remedial measures are effected.
The economic value of equity is a measure which reflects the impact of changing rates on the
underlying values of the Companys assets and liabilities in various rate scenarios. The scenarios
illustrate the potential estimated impact of instantaneous rate shocks on the underlying value of
equity. The economic value of the equity is based on the present value of all the future cash
flows under the different rate scenarios.
Rate Sensitivity Analysis
(Dollars in Thousands) | September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Change in | Change in | |||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in | Net Interest | % | Econcomic Value | % | ||||||||||||
Interest Rates (Basis Points) | Income | Change | of Equity | Change | ||||||||||||
200 |
$ | (1,051 | ) | (1.5 | ) | $ | (21,155 | ) | (8.6 | ) | ||||||
100 |
967 | 1.4 | 954 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
(100) |
(1,523 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (10,705 | ) | (4.4 | ) | ||||||||
(200) |
(4,379 | ) | (6.4 | ) | (34,456 | ) | (14.0 | ) |
December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in | Change in | |||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in | Net Interest | % | Econcomic Value | % | ||||||||||||
Interest Rates (Basis Points) | Income | Change | of Equity | Change | ||||||||||||
200 |
$ | (3,124 | ) | (4.2 | ) | $ | (30,894 | ) | (10.7 | ) | ||||||
100 |
(327 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (5,315 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||
(100) |
(449 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (11,128 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||
(200) |
(1,657 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (32,008 | ) | (11.1 | ) |
-31-
Table of Contents
PART I. ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 13a-15(b). Based on that evaluation, the Companys CEO
along with the Companys CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its
consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC filings.
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys disclosure
controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can
occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
-32-
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is currently a defendant in various legal actions and asserted claims in the normal
course of business. Although the Company and legal counsel are unable to assess the ultimate
outcome of each of these matters with certainty, they are of the belief that the resolution of
these actions should not have a material adverse affect on the financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows of the Company.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Except for the risk factor set forth below, there were no material changes to the risk factors as
presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Declines in asset values may result in impairment charges and adversely impact the value of our
investments
The Company maintains an investment portfolio, which includes trust-preferred securities. At
September 30, 2008, the total market value of these trust-preferred securities was approximately
$87.52 million, compared with an adjusted cost basis of
approximately $164.20 million. The decline
in market value of these securities is primarily due to the credit market disruptions in bank
subordinated debt instruments, credit rating downgrades and the possibility of future negative
credit events within the banking sector. The Company periodically, but not less than quarterly,
evaluates its investments and other assets for impairment indicators. In the event that the
Company is required to record impairment charges for its investments due to a decline in value that
is considered other-than-temporarily impaired, it could have a material adverse affect on the
Companys results of operations and a non-cash impact on funds from operations in the period in
which the write-down occurs.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) | Not Applicable | ||
(b) | Not Applicable | ||
(c) | Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The following table sets forth open market purchases by the Company of its equity securities during
the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Maximum | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||
Total # of | Average | Shares Purchased | Shares That May | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | as Part of Publicly | Yet be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Purchased | per Share | Announced Plan | Under the Plan | |||||||||||||
July 1-31, 2008 |
4,000 | $ | 27.60 | 4,000 | 551,060 | |||||||||||
August 1-31, 2008 |
| | | 562,493 | ||||||||||||
September 1-30, 2008 |
| | | 568,579 | ||||||||||||
Total |
4,000 | $ | | 4,000 | ||||||||||||
The Companys stock repurchase plan allows for the purchase and retention of up to 1,100,000
shares. The plan has no expiration date and remains open. The Company held 531,421 shares in
treasury at September 30, 2008.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not Applicable
-33-
Table of Contents
ITEM 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. Exhibits
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. | Exhibit | |||
3.1
|
| Articles of Incorporation of First Community Bancshares, Inc., as amended. (1) | ||
3.2
|
| Bylaws of First Community Bancshares, Inc., as amended. (15) | ||
4.1
|
| Specimen stock certificate of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (3) | ||
4.2
|
| Indenture Agreement dated September 25, 2003. (10) | ||
4.3
|
| Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of FCBI Capital Trust dated September 25, 2003. (10) | ||
4.4
|
| Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement dated September 25, 2003. (10) | ||
10.1
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Contracts (2) and Plan. (4) | ||
10.1.1
|
| Amendment to First Community Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan. (10) | ||
10.2
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Non-Qualified Directors Stock Option Plan. (5) | ||
10.3
|
| Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2000 and amended October 17, 2000, between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and John M. Mendez. (2) (6) | ||
10.4
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2000 Executive Retention Plan, as amended. (2) | ||
10.5
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. Split Dollar Plan and Agreement. (2) | ||
10.6
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Directors Supplemental Retirement Plan. (2) | ||
10.6.1
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Directors Supplemental Retirement Plan. Second Amendment (B.W. Harvey, Sr. October 19, 2004). (12) | ||
10.7
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. Wrap Plan. (7) | ||
10.8
|
| Reserved. | ||
10.9
|
| Form of Indemnification Agreement between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and its Directors and Certain Executive Officers. (8) | ||
10.10
|
| Form of Indemnification Agreement between First Community Bank, N. A., its Directors and Certain Executive Officers. (8) | ||
10.11
|
| Reserved. | ||
10.12
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock Option Plan (9) and Award Agreement. (11) | ||
10.13
|
| Reserved. | ||
10.14
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. (7) | ||
10.15
|
| First Community Bancshares, Inc. Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Bonus Plan For Key Employees. (13) | ||
10.16
|
| Employment Agreement dated November 30, 2006, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Ronald L. Campbell. (16) | ||
10.17
|
| Employment Agreement dated September 28, 2007, between GreenPoint Insurance Group, Inc. and Shawn C. Cummings. (17) | ||
31.1
|
| Rule 13a-14(a)/a5d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | ||
31.2
|
| Rule 13a-14(a)/a5d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | ||
32
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Section 1350. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007. |
-34-
Table of Contents
(2) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 14, 2002. | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, filed on March 25, 2003, as amended on March 31, 2003. | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, filed on March 30, 2000, as amended April 13, 2000. | |
(5) | The option agreements entered into pursuant to the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Non-Qualified Directors Stock Option Plan are incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 14, 2002. | |
(6) | First Community Bancshares, Inc. has entered into substantially identical agreements with Robert L. Buzzo and E. Stephen Lilly, with the only differences being with respect to title, salary and the use of a vehicle. | |
(7) | Incorporated by reference from Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2006, and filed August 23, 2006. | |
(8) | Form of indemnification agreement entered into by the Company and by First Community Bank, N. A. with their respective directors and certain officers of each including, for the Registrant and Bank: John M. Mendez, Robert L. Schumacher, Robert L. Buzzo, E. Stephen Lilly, David D. Brown, and Gary R. Mills. Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 10.10 and 10.11 of Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 15, 2004, and amended on May 19, 2004. | |
(9) | Incorporated by reference from the 2004 First Community Bancshares, Inc. Definitive Proxy filed on March 19, 2004. | |
(10) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, filed on November 10, 2003. | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed on August 6, 2004. | |
(12) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6.1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, and filed on March 16, 2005. Amendments in substantially similar form were executed for Directors Clark, Kantor, Hamner, Modena, Perkinson, Stafford, and Stafford, II. | |
(13) | Incorporated by reference from Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 24, 2006, and filed October 25, 2006. | |
(14) | Reserved. | |
(15) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, filed on November 8, 2006. | |
(16) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Form S-3 registration statement filed May 2, 2007. | |
(17) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.17 of the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, filed March 13, 2008. |
-35-
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
First Community Bancshares, Inc.
DATE: November 10, 2008
/s/ John M. Mendez | ||||
John M. Mendez | ||||
President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
DATE: November 10, 2008
/s/ David D. Brown | ||||
David D. Brown | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
-36-
Table of Contents