FIRST COMMUNITY BANKSHARES INC /VA/ - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011
Commission file number 000-19297
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 55-0694814 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
P.O. Box 989 Bluefield, Virginia |
24605-0989 |
(276) 326-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value; 17,917,824 shares outstanding as of August 5, 2011
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011
INDEX
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
49 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
53 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
- 2 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 31,451 | $ | 28,816 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
162,629 | 81,526 | ||||||
Interest-bearing balances with banks |
36,539 | 1,847 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
230,619 | 112,189 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale |
349,976 | 480,064 | ||||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
4,106 | 4,637 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
920 | 4,694 | ||||||
Loans held for investment, net of unearned income |
1,373,944 | 1,386,206 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
26,482 | 26,482 | ||||||
Net loans held for investment |
1,347,462 | 1,359,724 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
55,808 | 56,244 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
5,585 | 4,910 | ||||||
Interest receivable |
6,202 | 7,675 | ||||||
Goodwill |
85,132 | 84,914 | ||||||
Other intangible assets |
5,205 | 5,725 | ||||||
Other assets |
115,385 | 123,462 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,206,400 | $ | 2,244,238 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing |
$ | 219,488 | $ | 205,151 | ||||
Interest-bearing |
1,360,188 | 1,415,804 | ||||||
Total deposits |
1,579,676 | 1,620,955 | ||||||
Interest, taxes and other liabilities |
20,563 | 21,318 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
137,778 | 140,894 | ||||||
FHLB borrowings |
150,000 | 175,000 | ||||||
Other indebtedness |
16,179 | 16,193 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,904,196 | 1,974,360 | ||||||
Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value undesignated; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010 |
| | ||||||
Series A preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000 shares authorized; 18,921 shares
issued at June 30, 2011, and no shares issued at December 31, 2010 |
18,921 | | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,082,822 shares
issued at June 30, 2011, and 18,082,822 issued at December 31, 2010,
and 164,998 and 216,487 shares in treasury, respectively |
18,083 | 18,083 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
188,278 | 189,239 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
89,257 | 81,486 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost |
(5,137 | ) | (6,740 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(7,198 | ) | (12,190 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
302,204 | 269,878 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,206,400 | $ | 2,244,238 | ||||
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 3 -
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Interest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans held for investment |
$ | 20,094 | $ | 20,997 | $ | 40,549 | $ | 42,351 | ||||||||
Interest on securities taxable |
1,850 | 3,730 | 4,383 | 7,516 | ||||||||||||
Interest on securities nontaxable |
1,291 | 1,394 | 2,824 | 2,820 | ||||||||||||
Interest on deposits in banks |
100 | 34 | 169 | 80 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
23,335 | 26,155 | 47,925 | 52,767 | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
3,273 | 5,106 | 7,153 | 10,608 | ||||||||||||
Interest on borrowings |
2,308 | 2,507 | 4,743 | 4,998 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
5,581 | 7,613 | 11,896 | 15,606 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
17,754 | 18,542 | 36,029 | 37,161 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,079 | 3,596 | 4,691 | 7,261 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
14,675 | 14,946 | 31,338 | 29,900 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Income |
||||||||||||||||
Wealth management income |
930 | 1,012 | 1,824 | 1,897 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
3,353 | 3,347 | 6,384 | 6,339 | ||||||||||||
Other service charges and fees |
1,461 | 1,250 | 2,867 | 2,531 | ||||||||||||
Insurance commissions |
1,561 | 1,389 | 3,504 | 3,590 | ||||||||||||
Total impairment losses on securities |
| (185 | ) | (527 | ) | (185 | ) | |||||||||
Portion of
loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
| (185 | ) | (527 | ) | (185 | ) | |||||||||
Net gains on sale of securities |
3,224 | 1,201 | 5,060 | 1,451 | ||||||||||||
Other operating income |
834 | 890 | 1,750 | 1,859 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
11,363 | 8,904 | 20,862 | 17,482 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
8,685 | 8,487 | 17,814 | 16,456 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy expense of bank premises |
1,568 | 1,570 | 3,215 | 3,279 | ||||||||||||
Furniture and equipment expense |
909 | 918 | 1,824 | 1,822 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
261 | 253 | 520 | 509 | ||||||||||||
FDIC premiums and assessments |
414 | 710 | 1,292 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||
Prepayment penalties on FHLB advances |
| | 471 | | ||||||||||||
Other operating expense |
5,901 | 4,660 | 10,665 | 9,193 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
17,738 | 16,598 | 35,801 | 32,670 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
8,300 | 7,252 | 16,399 | 14,712 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,572 | 2,121 | 4,920 | 4,303 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
5,728 | 5,131 | 11,479 | 10,409 | ||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
131 | | 131 | | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 5,597 | $ | 5,131 | $ | 11,348 | $ | 10,409 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||
Cash dividends per common share |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding |
17,895,904 | 17,787,325 | 17,882,006 | 17,776,500 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
18,534,489 | 17,805,393 | 18,200,184 | 17,792,535 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 4 -
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
(Dollars In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,479 | $ | 10,409 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,691 | 7,261 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
2,034 | 2,036 | ||||||
Intangible amortization |
520 | 509 | ||||||
Net investment amortization and accretion |
162 | 7 | ||||||
Net loss on the sale of property, plant, and equipment |
42 | 56 | ||||||
Net gain on the sale of securities |
(5,060 | ) | (1,425 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans originated for sale |
(19,704 | ) | (17,365 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans |
23,884 | 27,157 | ||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
(406 | ) | (357 | ) | ||||
Equity-based compensation expense |
21 | 36 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
2,618 | (147 | ) | |||||
Decrease in interest receivable |
1,473 | 751 | ||||||
FHLB debt prepayment fees |
471 | | ||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
527 | 185 | ||||||
Other operating activities, net |
1,638 | 10,116 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
24,390 | 39,229 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale |
182,167 | 71,708 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale |
19,317 | 38,488 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity |
535 | 998 | ||||||
Purchase of securities available-for-sale |
(59,334 | ) | (113,690 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from (originations of) loans and leases |
6,822 | (15,098 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock |
736 | | ||||||
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment |
(1,799 | ) | (1,552 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, plant, and equipment |
175 | 86 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
148,619 | (19,060 | ) | |||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits |
14,337 | (2,513 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits |
(55,616 | ) | (30,028 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in FHLB and other borrowings |
(25,014 | ) | (3,059 | ) | ||||
FHLB debt prepayment fees |
(471 | ) | | |||||
Net decrease in securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
(3,116 | ) | (5,862 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
32 | 30 | ||||||
Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock |
18,841 | | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
5 | 9 | ||||||
Common dividends paid |
(3,577 | ) | (3,556 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(54,579 | ) | (44,979 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
118,430 | (24,810 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
112,189 | 101,341 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 230,619 | $ | 76,531 | ||||
Supplemental information noncash items
|
$ | 5,065 | $ | 5,075 | ||||
Transfer of loans to other real estate |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 5 -
Table of Contents
FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Stock | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Income (Loss) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2010 |
$ | | $ | 18,083 | $ | 190,967 | $ | 66,760 | $ | (9,891 | ) | $ | (13,652 | ) | $ | 252,267 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 10,409 | | | 10,409 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income see note 9 |
| | | | | 8,205 | 8,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | | 10,409 | | 8,205 | 18,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared and paid |
| | | (3,556 | ) | | | (3,556 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of vested shares |
| | (25 | ) | | 25 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense |
| | 36 | | | | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement plan contribution
38,560 shares issued |
| | (667 | ) | | 1,201 | | 534 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Option exercises 2,631 shares |
| | (52 | ) | | 82 | | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2010 |
$ | | $ | 18,083 | $ | 190,259 | $ | 73,613 | $ | (8,583 | ) | $ | (5,447 | ) | $ | 267,925 | ||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2011 |
$ | | $ | 18,083 | $ | 189,239 | $ | 81,486 | $ | (6,740 | ) | $ | (12,190 | ) | $ | 269,878 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 11,479 | | | 11,479 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income see note 9 |
| | | | | 4,992 | 4,992 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | | 11,479 | | 4,992 | 16,471 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends declared and paid |
| | | (3,577 | ) | | | (3,577 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends declared |
| | | (131 | ) | | | (131 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock |
18,921 | | (80 | ) | | | | 18,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of vested shares |
| | (22 | ) | | 22 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense |
| | 13 | | 8 | | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement plan contribution
47,570 shares issued |
| | (812 | ) | | 1,481 | | 669 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Option exercises 2,969 shares |
| | (60 | ) | | 92 | | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2011 |
$ | 18,921 | $ | 18,083 | $ | 188,278 | $ | 89,257 | $ | (5,137 | ) | $ | (7,198 | ) | $ | 302,204 | ||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 6 -
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. General
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of First Community Bancshares, Inc.
and subsidiaries (First Community or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, necessary for a
fair presentation have been made. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These results are not necessarily indicative of the results of consolidated operations that might
be expected for the full calendar year.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
2010 Form 10-K). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance
with standards for the preparation of interim consolidated financial statements. These consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
A more complete and detailed description of First Communitys significant accounting policies is
included within Note 1 of Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the Companys
2010 Form 10-K. Further discussion of the Companys application of critical accounting policies is
included within the Application of Critical Accounting Policies section of Item 2,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included
herein.
The Company operates within two business segments-community banking and insurance services. Insurance
services are comprised of agencies that sell property and casualty and life and health insurance
policies and arrangements. All other operations, including commercial and consumer banking, lending
activities, and wealth management are included within the banking segment.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are determined by dividing net income available to common shareholders by
the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are determined by
dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, which includes the dilutive effect
of stock options, warrants, contingently issuable shares, and convertible preferred shares. Basic
and diluted net income per common share calculations follow:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
ended June 30, | ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 5,728 | $ | 5,131 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 10,409 | ||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
131 | | 131 | | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 5,597 | $ | 5,131 | $ | 11,348 | $ | 10,409 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
17,895,904 | 17,787,325 | 17,882,006 | 17,776,500 | ||||||||||||
Diluted shares for stock options |
27,497 | 6,487 | 6,706 | 4,454 | ||||||||||||
Contingently issuable shares |
8,527 | 11,581 | 8,527 | 11,581 | ||||||||||||
Convertible preferred shares |
602,561 | | 302,945 | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding |
18,534,489 | 17,805,393 | 18,200,184 | 17,792,535 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.59 |
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, options and warrants to purchase 457,045
and 480,396 shares, respectively, of common stock were outstanding but were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per common
- 7 -
Table of Contents
share because they would have an anti-dilutive effect.
Likewise, options and warrants to purchase 576,962 and 699,156 shares, respectively, of common
stock were excluded from the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, computation of
diluted earnings per common share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Series A Preferred Stock
On May 20, 2011, the Company completed a private placement of 18,921 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock. The shares carry a 6% dividend rate and are non-cumulative. Each share is convertible into 69 shares of the Companys common stock at any time and mandatorily convert after five years. The Company may redeem the shares at face value after the third anniversary.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) Topic 310,
Receivables. New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 310 amends prior guidance to
provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entitys allowance for credit
losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables by providing additional information to
assist financial statement users in assessing an entitys credit risk exposures and evaluating the
adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The Company adopted the provisions of the new
authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 310 during the fourth quarter of 2010. Other than
the additional disclosures, the adoption of the new guidance had no significant impact on the
Companys financial statements.
In April 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2011-02 A Creditors Determination
of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, which clarifies when creditors should
classify loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. The guidance is effective for interim
and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and is applied retrospectively to
restructurings at the beginning of the year of adoption. The guidance on measuring the impairment
of a receivable restructured in a troubled restructuring is effective on a prospective basis. The
Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial statements.
In April 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-03 Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase
Agreements, which simplifies the accounting for financial assets transferred under repurchase
agreements and similar arrangements by eliminating the transferors ability criteria from the
assessment of effective control over those assets as well as the related implementation guidance.
The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011,
and is applied on a prospective basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its
financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to
Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requires in the U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, which was issued primarily to provide largely identical
guidance about fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and U.S. GAAP.
The new standards do not extend the use of fair value but rather provide guidance about how fair value should be determined where it already is
required or permitted under IFRS or U.S. GAAP. For U.S. GAAP, most of the changes are clarifications of existing guidance or wording changes to
align with IFRS. Public companies are required to apply the standard prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial statements.
In June 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income,
which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The new guidance removes the presentation options
in ASC 22 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either a continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but
consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. The amendments of ASU 2011-05 are
effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is
currently assessing the impact on its financial statements.
Conversion to State Charter
Effective with the close of business June 28, 2011, the Companys wholly-owned banking subsidiary, First Community
Bank, converted its charter from a national association to a Virginia state-chartered banking institution. First Community
Bank will continue operating under the name First Community Bank. The charter conversion does not affect insurance
coverage of First Community Banks deposits, which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to
the maximum amounts permitted by law, and does not affect the financial services or products provided by First Community
Bank. As a Virginia state-chartered bank, First Community Bank is supervised and regulated by
the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions and its primary federal regulator is the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, both
of which are based in the Companys home state of Virginia. As a financial holding company, the Company will continue to
be supervised and regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Note 2. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Branching Activity
In July 2010, GreenPoint Insurance Group, Inc. (GreenPoint), the Companys
wholly-owned insurance subsidiary, acquired Murphy Insurance Agency, based in Princeton, West
Virginia, issuing cash consideration of approximately $190 thousand. Acquisition terms call for
additional cash consideration if certain operating performance targets are met. The Company has
recorded the fair value of the expected additional cash consideration as $477 thousand in long-term
debt. If those targets are not met, the value of the consideration ultimately paid will decrease
the liability and will be recognized as a gain in the period in which the targets are not met.
Goodwill and other intangibles associated with the acquisition total approximately $667 thousand.
- 8 -
Table of Contents
Note 3. Investment Securities
As of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of
available-for-sale securities were as follows:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | OTTI in | ||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | AOCI* | |||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 124,579 | $ | 2,653 | $ | (452 | ) | $ | 126,780 | $ | | |||||||||
Single issue trust preferred securities |
55,618 | | (9,021 | ) | 46,597 | | ||||||||||||||
Corporate FDIC insured |
13,830 | | (28 | ) | 13,802 | | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
147,304 | 3,748 | (126 | ) | 150,926 | | ||||||||||||||
Non-Agency Alt-A residential |
18,191 | | (6,935 | ) | 11,256 | (6,935 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
165,495 | 3,748 | (7,061 | ) | 162,182 | (6,935 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity securities |
440 | 218 | (43 | ) | 615 | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 359,962 | $ | 6,619 | $ | (16,605 | ) | $ | 349,976 | $ | (6,935 | ) | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | OTTI in | ||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | AOCI* | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities |
$ | 10,000 | $ | | $ | (168 | ) | $ | 9,832 | $ | | |||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
178,149 | 2,649 | (4,660 | ) | 176,138 | | ||||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Single issue |
55,594 | | (14,350 | ) | 41,244 | | ||||||||||||||
Pooled |
23 | 241 | | 264 | | |||||||||||||||
Total trust preferred securities |
55,617 | 241 | (14,350 | ) | 41,508 | | ||||||||||||||
Corporate FDIC insured |
25,282 | 378 | | 25,660 | | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
209,281 | 7,039 | (1,307 | ) | 215,013 | | ||||||||||||||
Non-Agency Alt-A residential |
19,181 | | (7,904 | ) | 11,277 | (7,904 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
228,462 | 7,039 | (9,211 | ) | 226,290 | (7,904 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity securities |
495 | 206 | (65 | ) | 636 | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 498,005 | $ | 10,513 | $ | (28,454 | ) | $ | 480,064 | $ | (7,904 | ) | ||||||||
* | Other-than-temporary impairment in accumulated other comprehensive income. |
- 9 -
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the amortized cost and estimated fair value of
held-to-maturity securities were as follows:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 51 | $ | | $ | 4,157 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 51 | $ | | $ | 4,157 | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 4,637 | $ | 67 | $ | | $ | 4,704 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,637 | $ | 67 | $ | | $ | 4,704 | ||||||||
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities by contractual
maturity at June 30, 2011, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
Amortized | ||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 116 | $ | 118 | ||||
Due after one year but within
five years |
27,147 | 27,545 | ||||||
Due after five years but within
ten years |
24,073 | 25,072 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
142,691 | 134,444 | ||||||
194,027 | 187,179 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
165,495 | 162,182 | ||||||
Equity securities |
440 | 615 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 359,962 | $ | 349,976 | ||||
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity
at June 30, 2011, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
Amortized | ||||||||
(In Thousands) | Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 1,426 | $ | 1,441 | ||||
Due after one year but within
five years |
2,310 | 2,340 | ||||||
Due after five years but
within ten years |
370 | 376 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
| | ||||||
Total |
$ | 4,106 | $ | 4,157 | ||||
The carrying value of securities pledged to secure public deposits as required by law and for other
purposes was $246.86 million and $302.67 million at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, gross gains on the sale of securities were $4.33
million while gross losses were $1.10 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, gross
gains on the sale of securities were $6.68 million while gross losses were $1.62 million. During
the three months ended June 30, 2010, gross gains on the sale of securities were $1.23 million
while gross losses were $26 thousand. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, gross gains on the
sale of securities were $1.49 million while gross losses were $34 thousand.
- 10 -
Table of Contents
The following tables reflect those investments, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, in a
continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and for 12 months or longer at June 30,
2011, and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 27,090 | $ | (452 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 27,090 | $ | (452 | ) | ||||||||||
Single issue trust preferred
securities |
| | 46,597 | (9,021 | ) | 46,597 | (9,021 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
FDIC-backed securities |
13,802 | (28 | ) | | | 13,802 | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
29,319 | (119 | ) | 4,924 | (7 | ) | 34,243 | (126 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A residential |
| | 11,256 | (6,935 | ) | 11,256 | (6,935 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
29,319 | (119 | ) | 16,180 | (6,942 | ) | 45,499 | (7,061 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
127 | (23 | ) | 116 | (20 | ) | 243 | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 70,338 | $ | (622 | ) | $ | 62,893 | $ | (15,983 | ) | $ | 133,231 | $ | (16,605 | ) | |||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agency securities |
$ | 9,832 | $ | (168 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 9,832 | $ | (168 | ) | ||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
80,420 | (4,660 | ) | | | 80,420 | (4,660 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Single issue trust preferred
securities |
| | 41,244 | (14,350 | ) | 41,244 | (14,350 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency |
71,613 | (1,307 | ) | 18 | | 71,631 | (1,307 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A residential |
| | 11,277 | (7,904 | ) | 11,277 | (7,904 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
71,613 | (1,307 | ) | 11,295 | (7,904 | ) | 82,908 | (9,211 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
155 | (55 | ) | 93 | (10 | ) | 248 | (65 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 162,020 | $ | (6,190 | ) | $ | 52,632 | $ | (22,264 | ) | $ | 214,652 | $ | (28,454 | ) | |||||||||
At June 30, 2011, the combined depreciation in value of the 90 individual securities in an
unrealized loss position was approximately 4.74% of the combined reported value of the aggregate
securities portfolio. At December 31, 2010, the combined depreciation in value of the 214
individual securities in an unrealized loss position was approximately 5.93% of the combined
reported value of the aggregate securities portfolio.
The Company reviews its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). The analysis differs depending upon the type of
investment security being analyzed. For debt securities, the Company has determined that it does
not intend to sell securities that are impaired and has asserted that it is not more likely than
not that the
Company will have to sell impaired securities before recovery of the impairment occurs. This determination is based upon the
Companys investment strategy for the particular type of security and
its cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy and interest rate risk
position.
For non-beneficial interest debt securities, the Company analyzes several qualitative factors such
as the severity and duration of the impairment, adverse conditions within the issuing industry,
prospects for the issuer, performance of the security, changes in rating by rating agencies and
other qualitative factors to determine if the impairment will be recovered. Non-beneficial interest
debt securities consist of U. S. government agency securities, states and political subdivisions,
and single issue trust preferred securities. If it is determined that there is evidence that the
impairment will not be recovered, the Company performs a present value calculation to determine the
amount of credit related impairment and records any credit related OTTI through earnings and the
non-credit related OTTI through other comprehensive income (OCI). During the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred no OTTI charges related to non-beneficial
interest debt securities. The temporary impairment on these securities is primarily related to
changes in interest rates, certain disruptions in the credit markets, and other current economic
factors.
- 11 -
Table of Contents
For beneficial interest debt securities, the Company reviews cash flow analyses on each applicable
security to determine if an adverse change in cash flows expected to be collected has occurred.
Beneficial interest debt securities consist of mortgage-backed securities and pooled trust
preferred securities. An adverse change in cash flows expected to be collected has occurred if the
present value of cash flows previously projected is greater than the present value of cash flows
projected at the current reporting date and less than the current book value. If an adverse change
in cash flows is deemed to have occurred, then an OTTI has occurred. The Company then compares the
present value of cash flows using the current yield for the current reporting period to the
reference amount, or current net book value, to determine the credit-related OTTI. The
credit-related OTTI is then recorded through earnings and the non-credit related OTTI is accounted
for in OCI.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred no credit-related OTTI
charges related to beneficial interest debt securities. During the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, the Company incurred credit-related OTTI charges related to beneficial interest debt
securities of $527 thousand. These charges were related to a non-Agency mortgage-backed security (MBS).
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred credit-related
OTTI charges on beneficial interest debt securities of $134 thousand. These charges were related to
two pooled trust preferred security holdings and brought the carrying value of those securities to
zero.
For the non-Agency, Alt-A residential MBS, the Company models cash flows using the following
assumptions: voluntary constant prepayment speed of 5, a customized constant default rate scenario
that assumes approximately 22% of the remaining underlying mortgages will default, and a loss
severity of 60.
The table below provides a cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized in earnings for debt
securities for which a portion of an OTTI is recognized in OCI:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||
(In Thousands) | Ended June 30, 2011 | Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||
Estimated credit losses, beginning balance (1) |
$ | 4,778 | $ | 4,251 | ||||
Additions for credit losses on securities not previously OTTI |
| | ||||||
Additions for credit losses on securities previously OTTI |
| 527 | ||||||
Reduction for increases in cash flows |
| | ||||||
Reduction for securities management no longer intends to
hold to recovery |
| | ||||||
Reduction for realized losses |
| | ||||||
Estimated credit losses, ending balance |
$ | 4,778 | $ | 4,778 | ||||
(1) | The beginning balance includes credit-related losses included in OTTI charges recognized on debt securities in prior periods. |
For equity securities, the Company reviews for OTTI based upon the prospects of the underlying
companies, analysts expectations, and certain other qualitative factors to determine if impairment
is recoverable over a foreseeable period of time. During the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011, the Company did not recognize any OTTI charges on equity securities. For the three-
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized OTTI charges on certain of its
equity securities of $51 thousand.
As a condition to membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system, the Company is required
to subscribe to a minimum level of stock in the FHLB of Atlanta (FHLBA). The Company believes this
ownership position provides access to relatively inexpensive wholesale and overnight funding. The
Company accounts for FHLBA and Federal Reserve Bank stock as a long-term investment in other
assets. At June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company owned approximately $11.50 million and
$12.24 million, respectively, in FHLBA stock, which is classified as other assets. The Companys
policy is to review for impairment of such assets at the end of each reporting period. Based on the Companys review of publicly available information about the FHLBA and its own internal analysis, the Company
believes that its FHLBA stock was not impaired as of June 30, 2011.
- 12 -
Table of Contents
Note 4. Loans
Loans, net of unearned income, consist of the following:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 34,966 | 2.55 | % | $ | 42,694 | 3.08 | % | ||||||||
Land development |
4,694 | 0.34 | % | 16,650 | 1.20 | % | ||||||||||
Other land loans |
23,354 | 1.70 | % | 24,468 | 1.77 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
92,891 | 6.76 | % | 94,123 | 6.79 | % | ||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
78,163 | 5.69 | % | 67,824 | 4.89 | % | ||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
333,475 | 24.27 | % | 351,904 | 25.39 | % | ||||||||||
Agricultural |
1,677 | 0.12 | % | 1,342 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
Farmland |
37,227 | 2.71 | % | 36,954 | 2.67 | % | ||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
606,447 | 44.14 | % | 635,959 | 45.89 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
111,995 | 8.15 | % | 111,620 | 8.05 | % | ||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
560,527 | 40.80 | % | 549,157 | 39.61 | % | ||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
18,062 | 1.31 | % | 18,349 | 1.32 | % | ||||||||||
Total consumer real estate loans |
690,584 | 50.26 | % | 679,126 | 48.98 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer and other loans |
||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
64,692 | 4.71 | % | 63,475 | 4.58 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
12,221 | 0.89 | % | 7,646 | 0.55 | % | ||||||||||
Total consumer and other loans |
76,913 | 5.60 | % | 71,121 | 5.13 | % | ||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 1,373,944 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,386,206 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 920 | $ | 4,694 | ||||||||||||
Acquired, Impaired Loans
Loans acquired in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase
date. Under applicable accounting standards, it is not appropriate to carryover a valuation for the allowance for loan losses at the time of acquisition when the acquired loans have
evidence of credit deterioration. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include measures such as
credit scores, decline in collateral value, past due and non-accrual status. For acquired, impaired loans the difference between
contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at
acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable difference which is included in the carrying amount
of the loans. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision
for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan
losses to the extent of prior charges, or a reversal of the nonaccretable difference with a
positive impact on interest income prospectively. Further, any excess of cash flows expected at
acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized
in interest income over the remaining life of the loan when there is a reasonable expectation about
the amount and timing of such cash flows. Acquired performing loans are recorded at fair value,
including a credit component. The fair value adjustment is accreted as an adjustment to yield over
the estimated lives of the loans. There is no allowance for loan losses established at the
acquisition date for acquired performing loans. A provision for loan losses is recorded for any
credit deterioration in these loans subsequent to acquisition.
- 13 -
Table of Contents
The following table presents information regarding acquired, impaired loans for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The Company has estimated the cash flows to be collected on the loans and
discounted those cash flows at a market rate of interest.
Acquired, Impaired Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
TriStone | Other | Total | TriStone | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1 |
$ | 2,814 | $ | 407 | $ | 3,221 | $ | 3,838 | $ | 4,196 | $ | 8,034 | ||||||||||||
Principal payments received |
(173 | ) | | (173 | ) | (961 | ) | (224 | ) | (1,185 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accretion |
13 | | 13 | 30 | | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
60 | | 60 | 426 | | 426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
| | | (499 | ) | | (499 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30 |
$ | 2,714 | $ | 407 | $ | 3,121 | $ | 2,834 | $ | 3,972 | $ | 6,806 | ||||||||||||
Balance, March 31 |
$ | 2,884 | $ | 407 | $ | 3,291 | $ | 3,323 | $ | 3,972 | $ | 7,295 | ||||||||||||
Principal payments received |
(138 | ) | | (138 | ) | (94 | ) | | (94 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Accretion |
6 | | 6 | 15 | | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(38 | ) | | (38 | ) | 10 | | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
| | | (420 | ) | | (420 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30 |
$ | 2,714 | $ | 407 | $ | 3,121 | $ | 2,834 | $ | 3,972 | $ | 6,806 | ||||||||||||
The remaining balance of the accretable difference at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, was
$931 thousand and $944 thousand, respectively
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. These instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk beyond the amount recognized
on the balance sheet. The contractual amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of
involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. The Companys exposure
to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is
represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is not a
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration
dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments
are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon
extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparties. Collateral
held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and
income producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit and written financial guarantees are conditional commitments issued by
the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved
in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that
involved in extending loan facilities to customers. To the extent deemed necessary, collateral of
varying types and amounts is held to secure customer performance under certain of those letters of
credit outstanding.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are commitments to extend credit
(including availability of lines of credit) of $210.53 million and standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees written of $2.93 million at June 30, 2011. Additionally, the Company had gross
notional amounts of outstanding commitments to lend related to secondary market mortgage loans of
$3.50 million at June 30, 2011.
- 14 -
Table of Contents
Note 5. Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality
The
allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that the Company
believes is sufficient to absorb probable loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by charges to earnings in the form of
provision for loan losses and recoveries of prior loan charge-offs, and decreased by loans charged
off. The provision is calculated to bring the allowance to a level which, according to a systematic
process of measurement, reflects the amount management estimates is needed to absorb probable
losses within the portfolio. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available,
the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Companys
control, including, among other things, the performance of the Companys loan portfolio, the
economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan
classifications.
Management
performs quarterly assessments to determine the appropriate level of
allowance for loan losses.
Differences between actual loan loss experience and estimates are reflected through adjustments
that are made by either increasing or decreasing the allowance based upon current measurement
criteria. Commercial, consumer real estate, and non-real estate consumer loan portfolios are
evaluated separately for purposes of determining the allowance. The specific components of the
allowance include allocations to individual commercial credits and allocations to the remaining
non-homogeneous and homogeneous pools of loans that have been deemed impaired. Managements general
reserve allocations are based on judgment of qualitative and quantitative factors about both macro
and micro economic conditions reflected within the portfolio of loans and the economy as a whole.
Factors considered in this evaluation include, but are not necessarily limited to, probable losses
from loan and other credit arrangements, general economic conditions, changes in credit
concentrations or pledged collateral, historical loan loss experience, and trends in portfolio
volume, maturities, composition, delinquencies, and non-accruals.
The allowance methodology was recently enhanced to further segment the commercial loan portfolio by
risk grade. Historical loss rates for each risk grade of commercial loans are adjusted by environmental
factors to estimate the amount of reserve needed by segment.
While management has allocated
the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available for
use against any type of loan loss deemed appropriate by management.
The following tables detail the Companys allowance for loan loss activity, by portfolio segment,
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer Real | Consumer and | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Commercial | Estate | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 12,300 | $ | 12,641 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 26,482 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,504 | 408 | 167 | 3,079 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(2,727 | ) | (457 | ) | (272 | ) | (3,456 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries credited to
allowance |
223 | 49 | 105 | 377 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(2,504 | ) | (408 | ) | (167 | ) | (3,079 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 12,300 | $ | 12,641 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 26,482 | ||||||||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer Real | Consumer and | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Commercial | Estate | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 14,043 | $ | 8,417 | $ | 2,048 | $ | 24,508 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,989 | 1,304 | 303 | 3,596 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(2,503 | ) | (588 | ) | (282 | ) | (3,373 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries credited to
allowance |
120 | 24 | 136 | 280 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(2,383 | ) | (564 | ) | (146 | ) | (3,093 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 13,649 | $ | 9,157 | $ | 2,205 | $ | 25,011 | ||||||||
- 15 -
Table of Contents
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer Real | Consumer and | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Commercial | Estate | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 12,300 | $ | 12,641 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 26,482 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,865 | 1,621 | 205 | 4,691 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(3,167 | ) | (1,829 | ) | (487 | ) | (5,483 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries credited to
allowance |
302 | 208 | 282 | 792 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(2,865 | ) | (1,621 | ) | (205 | ) | (4,691 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 12,300 | $ | 12,641 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 26,482 | ||||||||
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer Real | Consumer and | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Commercial | Estate | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 13,802 | $ | 8,457 | $ | 2,018 | $ | 24,277 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,082 | 2,582 | 597 | 7,261 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(4,582 | ) | (1,918 | ) | (605 | ) | (7,105 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries credited to
allowance |
347 | 36 | 195 | 578 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(4,235 | ) | (1,882 | ) | (410 | ) | (6,527 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 13,649 | $ | 9,157 | $ | 2,205 | $ | 25,011 | ||||||||
The Company identifies loans for potential impairment through a variety of means including, but not
limited to, ongoing loan review, renewal processes, delinquency data, market communications, and
public information. If it is determined that it is probable that the Company will not collect all
principal and interest amounts contractually due, the loan is generally deemed to be impaired.
- 16 -
Table of Contents
The following table presents the Companys recorded investment in loans considered to be
impaired and related information on those impaired loans for the period ended June 30, 2011, and
December 31, 2010. Data for December 31, 2010, has been modified from the presentation in previous
periods to match the current period presentation.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter-to-Date | Year-to-Date | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Average | Interest | Average | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Related | Principal | Recorded | Income | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | Investment | Allowance | Balance | Investment | Recognized | Investment | Recognized | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans without a related allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 758 | $ | | $ | 770 | $ | 888 | $ | 3 | $ | 953 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Land development |
185 | | 185 | 916 | | 916 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
1,083 | | 1,083 | 1,588 | 1 | 2,517 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
3,908 | | 3,930 | 3,937 | 4 | 4,363 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
1,422 | | 1,433 | 1,539 | 2 | 1,545 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
2,503 | | 2,615 | 2,684 | 30 | 3,072 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
1,293 | | 1,331 | 1,318 | 14 | 1,398 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
8,666 | | 8,875 | 9,034 | 98 | 9,639 | 132 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
259 | | 264 | 332 | 3 | 333 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
53 | | 57 | 58 | 2 | 60 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 20,130 | $ | | $ | 20,543 | $ | 22,294 | $ | 156 | $ | 24,796 | $ | 211 | |||||||||||||||
Loans with a related allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 268 | $ | 25 | $ | 268 | $ | 269 | $ | | $ | 269 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Land development |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
112 | 4 | 112 | 113 | 2 | 113 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
612 | 340 | 637 | 641 | 8 | 651 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
788 | 310 | 788 | 780 | | 786 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
3,129 | 883 | 3,129 | 3,048 | 8 | 3,052 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
334 | 60 | 334 | 333 | | 333 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
8,230 | 1,317 | 8,298 | 8,247 | 83 | 8,342 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13,473 | $ | 2,939 | $ | 13,566 | $ | 13,431 | $ | 101 | $ | 13,546 | $ | 168 | |||||||||||||||
- 17 -
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Average | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Related | Principal | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | Investment | Allowance | Balance | Investment | Recognized | |||||||||||||||
Loans without a related allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 285 | $ | | $ | 732 | $ | 730 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||
Land development |
50 | | 144 | 143 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
323 | | 742 | 152 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
3,518 | | 5,384 | 6,237 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
2,526 | | 2,673 | 2,680 | 105 | |||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
3,824 | | 4,985 | 4,658 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
1,302 | | 1,595 | 1,605 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
7,992 | | 10,882 | 9,093 | 330 | |||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
6 | | 6 | 6 | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
98 | | 102 | 11 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 19,924 | $ | | $ | 27,245 | $ | 25,315 | $ | 559 | |||||||||||
Loans with a related allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Land development |
113 | 5 | 113 | 114 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
723 | 257 | 759 | 768 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
1,070 | 158 | 1,140 | 1,151 | 26 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
95 | 34 | 98 | 98 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
8,801 | 1,870 | 7,548 | 8,913 | 310 | |||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
$ | 10,802 | $ | 2,324 | $ | 9,658 | $ | 11,044 | $ | 366 | |||||||||||
As part of the ongoing monitoring of the credit quality of the Companys loan portfolio, management
tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to the risk rating of commercial
loans, the level of classified commercial loans, net charge-offs, non-performing loans and general
economic conditions. The Companys loan review function generally reviews all commercial loan
relationships greater than $2.00 million on an annual basis and at various times through the year.
Smaller commercial and retail loans are sampled for review throughout the year by our internal loan
review department. Through the loan review process, loans are identified for upgrade or downgrade
in risk rating and changed to reflect current information as part of the process.
The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its loans. A
description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:
| Pass This grade includes loans to borrowers of acceptable credit quality and risk. The Company further differentiates within this grade based upon borrower characteristics which include: capital strength, earnings stability, leverage, and industry. | ||
| Special Mention This grade includes loans that require more than a normal degree of supervision and attention. These loans have all the characteristics of an adequate asset, but due to being adversely affected by economic or financial conditions have a potential weakness that deserves managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan. | ||
| Substandard This grade includes loans that have well defined weaknesses which make payment default or principal exposure possible, but not yet certain. Such loans are apt to be dependent upon collateral liquidation, a secondary source of repayment, or an event outside of the normal course of business to meet the repayment terms. | ||
| Doubtful This grade includes loans that are placed on non-accrual status. These loans have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard loan with the added factor that the weaknesses are so severe that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions and values, is extremely unlikely, but because of certain specific pending factors, the amount of loss cannot yet be determined. |
- 18 -
Table of Contents
| Loss This grade includes loans that are to be charged-off or charged-down when payment is acknowledged to be uncertain or when the timing or value of payments cannot be determined. Loss is not intended to imply that the asset has no recovery or salvage value, but simply that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off all or some portion of the loan, even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. |
The following tables present the Companys investment in loans by internal credit grade indicator
at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | Pass | Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 33,028 | $ | 518 | $ | 1,420 | $ | | $ | | $ | 34,966 | ||||||||||||
Land development |
4,255 | 254 | 185 | | | 4,694 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
16,103 | 5,924 | 1,327 | | | 23,354 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
87,151 | 443 | 4,560 | 737 | | 92,891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
73,360 | 1,235 | 3,568 | | | 78,163 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
304,944 | 7,245 | 20,814 | 472 | | 333,475 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
1,654 | | 23 | | | 1,677 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
34,700 | 1,636 | 891 | | | 37,227 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
106,964 | 1,979 | 3,052 | | | 111,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
511,574 | 11,146 | 37,807 | | | 560,527 | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
17,272 | 132 | 658 | | | 18,062 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
64,013 | 115 | 564 | | | 64,692 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
12,206 | 3 | 12 | | | 12,221 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 1,267,224 | $ | 30,630 | $ | 74,881 | $ | 1,209 | $ | | $ | 1,373,944 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | Pass | Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 40,497 | $ | 663 | $ | 1,534 | $ | | $ | | $ | 42,694 | ||||||||||||
Land development |
14,458 | 1,226 | 966 | | | 16,650 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
16,723 | 6,138 | 1,607 | | | 24,468 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
87,156 | 1,756 | 5,211 | | | 94,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
61,059 | 2,553 | 4,212 | | | 67,824 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
316,026 | 18,942 | 16,936 | | | 351,904 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
1,318 | | 24 | | | 1,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
33,042 | 2,569 | 1,343 | | | 36,954 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
106,803 | 1,923 | 2,894 | | | 111,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
498,830 | 15,224 | 34,449 | 654 | | 549,157 | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
17,389 | 789 | 171 | | | 18,349 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
62,676 | 306 | 493 | | | 63,475 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
7,635 | 11 | | | | 7,646 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 1,263,612 | $ | 52,100 | $ | 69,840 | $ | 654 | $ | | $ | 1,386,206 | ||||||||||||
- 19 -
Table of Contents
The following tables detail the Companys recorded investment in loans related to each segment in
the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and disaggregated on the basis of the
Companys impairment methodology at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired, | Allowance for | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | Impaired | Acquired, | |||||||||||||||||||
Individually | for Loans | Collectively | for Loans | Loans | Impaired | |||||||||||||||||||
Evaluated for | Individually | Evaluated for | Collectively | Evaluated for | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | Impairment | Evaluated | Impairment | Evaluated | Impairment | Evaluated | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 1,026 | $ | 25 | $ | 33,940 | $ | 821 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Land development |
185 | | 4,509 | 224 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
1,195 | 4 | 21,734 | 584 | 425 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
4,520 | 340 | 87,752 | 1,849 | 619 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
2,210 | 310 | 75,953 | 1,773 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
5,632 | 883 | 327,399 | 5,055 | 444 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 1,677 | 23 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
334 | 60 | 36,893 | 380 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
15,102 | 1,622 | 589,857 | 10,709 | 1,488 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
1,293 | | 110,702 | 2,029 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
16,896 | 1,317 | 541,998 | 8,943 | 1,633 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
259 | | 17,803 | 276 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer real estate loans |
18,448 | 1,317 | 670,503 | 11,248 | 1,633 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer and other loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
53 | | 64,639 | 1,586 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | 12,221 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer and other loans |
53 | | 76,860 | 1,586 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 33,603 | $ | 2,939 | $ | 1,337,220 | $ | 23,543 | $ | 3,121 | $ | | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired, | Allowance for | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Allowance | Loans | Allowance | Impaired | Acquired, | |||||||||||||||||||
Individually | for Loans | Collectively | for Loans | Loans | Impaired | |||||||||||||||||||
Evaluated for | Individually | Evaluated for | Collectively | Evaluated for | Loans | |||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | Impairment | Evaluated | Impairment | Evaluated | Impairment | Evaluated | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 285 | $ | | $ | 42,409 | $ | 1,472 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Land development |
50 | 5 | 16,600 | 1,767 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
436 | | 23,520 | 747 | 512 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
3,518 | | 90,084 | 4,511 | 521 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
3,249 | 257 | 64,575 | 824 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
4,894 | 158 | 346,586 | 2,688 | 424 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 1,342 | 19 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
| | 36,954 | 70 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
12,432 | 420 | 622,070 | 12,098 | 1,457 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer real estate loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
1,397 | 34 | 110,223 | 2,104 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
16,793 | 1,870 | 530,600 | 7,999 | 1,764 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
6 | | 18,343 | 193 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer real estate loans |
18,196 | 1,904 | 659,166 | 10,296 | 1,764 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer and other loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
98 | | 63,377 | 1,764 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | 7,646 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer and other loans |
98 | | 71,023 | 1,764 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 30,726 | $ | 2,324 | $ | 1,352,259 | $ | 24,158 | $ | 3,221 | $ | | ||||||||||||
- 20 -
Table of Contents
Non-accrual and Past Due Loans
Non-accrual loans, presented by loan class, consisted of the following at June 30, 2011, and
December 31, 2010:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 1,026 | $ | 285 | ||||
Land development |
185 | 50 | ||||||
Other land loans |
807 | 321 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
4,113 | 3,518 | ||||||
Multi-family residential |
2,210 | 2,463 | ||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
5,304 | 4,670 | ||||||
Farmland |
334 | | ||||||
Home equity lines |
900 | 868 | ||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
6,163 | 6,364 | ||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
259 | 6 | ||||||
Consumer loans |
53 | 99 | ||||||
Total |
21,354 | 18,644 | ||||||
Acquired, impaired loans |
683 | 770 | ||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
$ | 22,037 | $ | 19,414 | ||||
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans, by loan class,
as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. There were no loans past due 90 days and still accruing
interest at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Non-accrual loans, excluding those 0 to 29 days
past due, are included in the applicable delinquency category.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Current | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | 30 - 59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90+ Days | Past Due | Loans | Loans | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 139 | $ | 281 | $ | 348 | $ | 768 | $ | 34,198 | $ | 34,966 | ||||||||||||
Land development |
| | | | 4,694 | 4,694 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
| | 359 | 359 | 22,995 | 23,354 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
117 | | 4,505 | 4,622 | 88,269 | 92,891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
395 | | 1,626 | 2,021 | 76,142 | 78,163 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
2,178 | 868 | 2,381 | 5,427 | 328,048 | 333,475 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
25 | | | 25 | 1,652 | 1,677 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
567 | | | 567 | 36,660 | 37,227 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
165 | 362 | 900 | 1,427 | 110,568 | 111,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
3,040 | 668 | 4,246 | 7,954 | 552,573 | 560,527 | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
120 | | 51 | 171 | 17,891 | 18,062 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
188 | | 53 | 241 | 64,451 | 64,692 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| 1 | | 1 | 12,220 | 12,221 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 6,934 | $ | 2,180 | $ | 14,469 | $ | 23,583 | $ | 1,350,361 | $ | 1,373,944 | ||||||||||||
- 21 -
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Current | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | 30 - 59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90+ Days | Past Due | Loans | Loans | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 531 | $ | | $ | 122 | $ | 653 | $ | 42,041 | $ | 42,694 | ||||||||||||
Land development |
| | 50 | 50 | 16,600 | 16,650 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
| | 684 | 684 | 23,784 | 24,468 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
3,648 | 121 | 356 | 4,125 | 89,998 | 94,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
956 | | 1,793 | 2,749 | 65,075 | 67,824 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
3,251 | 2,056 | 3,249 | 8,556 | 343,348 | 351,904 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
19 | | | 19 | 1,323 | 1,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Farmland |
110 | | | 110 | 36,844 | 36,954 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
682 | 250 | 608 | 1,540 | 110,080 | 111,620 | ||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
10,287 | 1,741 | 4,213 | 16,241 | 532,916 | 549,157 | ||||||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
855 | 326 | 6 | 1,187 | 17,162 | 18,349 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
433 | 47 | 31 | 511 | 62,964 | 63,475 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | 7,646 | 7,646 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 20,772 | $ | 4,541 | $ | 11,112 | $ | 36,425 | $ | 1,349,781 | $ | 1,386,206 | ||||||||||||
Note 6. Deposits
The following is a summary of interest-bearing deposits by type as of June 30, 2011, and December
31, 2010.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 271,622 | $ | 262,420 | ||||
Savings and money market deposits |
405,409 | 426,547 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts |
683,157 | 726,837 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,360,188 | $ | 1,415,804 | ||||
Note 7. Borrowings
The following schedule details the Companys indebtedness at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
$ | 137,778 | $ | 140,894 | ||||
FHLB borrowings |
150,000 | 175,000 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
15,464 | 15,464 | ||||||
Other long-term debt |
715 | 729 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 303,957 | $ | 332,087 | ||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consist of $87.78 million and $90.89 million of
retail overnight and term repurchase agreements at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively, and $50.00 million of wholesale repurchase agreements at both June 30, 2011, and
December 31, 2010.
The Company had a derivative interest rate swap instrument where it received LIBOR-based variable
interest payments and paid fixed interest payments that expired in January 2011. The instrument
effectively fixed $50.00 million of FHLB borrowings at 4.34% for a period of five years. For a more
detailed discussion of activities regarding derivatives, please see Note 13 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
- 22 -
Table of Contents
FHLB borrowings included $150.00 million in convertible and callable advances at June 30, 2011, and
$175.00 million at December 31, 2010. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company prepaid a
$25.00 million FHLB advance. The weighted average interest rate of all the advances was 4.12% at
June 30, 2011, and 2.39% at December 31, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, the FHLB advances have approximate contractual maturities between five and ten
years. The scheduled maturities of the advances are as follows:
(In Thousands) | Amount | |||
2011 |
$ | | ||
2012 |
| |||
2013 |
| |||
2014 |
| |||
2015 |
| |||
2016 and thereafter |
150,000 | |||
Total |
$ | 150,000 | ||
The callable advances may be redeemed at quarterly intervals after various lockout periods. These
call options may substantially shorten the lives of these instruments. If these advances are
called, the debt may be paid in full or converted to another FHLB credit product. Prepayment of the
advances may result in substantial penalties based upon the differential between contractual note
rates and current advance rates for similar maturities. At June 30, 2011, advances from the FHLB
were secured by qualifying loans of $310.71 million.
Also included in other indebtedness is $15.46 million of junior subordinated debentures (the
Debentures) issued by the Company in October 2003 to an unconsolidated trust subsidiary, FCBI
Capital Trust (the Trust), with an interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.95%. The Trust was
able to purchase the Debentures through the issuance of trust preferred securities which had
substantially identical terms as the Debentures. The Debentures mature on October 8, 2033, and are
currently callable.
The Company has committed to irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee the following payments or
distributions with respect to the preferred securities to the holders thereof to the extent that
the Trust has not made such payments or distributions: (i) accrued and unpaid distributions, (ii)
the redemption price, and (iii) upon a dissolution or termination of the Trust, the lesser of the
liquidation amount and all accrued and unpaid distributions and the amount of assets of the Trust
remaining available for distribution, in each case to the extent the Trust has funds available.
In addition to investment securities, at June 30, 2011, wholesale repurchase agreements were
collateralized by $35.77 million of interest-bearing balances with banks.
Note 8. Net Periodic Benefit Cost-Defined Benefit Plans
The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit cost of the Companys domestic
non-contributory, non-qualified defined executive retention plan for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 73 | $ | 53 | $ | 146 | $ | 106 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
56 | 47 | 111 | 94 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic cost |
$ | 129 | $ | 100 | $ | 257 | $ | 200 | ||||||||
- 23 -
Table of Contents
The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit cost of the Companys domestic
non-contributory, non-qualified directors retirement plan,
which was effective as of January 1, 2011, for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2011.
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||
Service cost |
$ | 29 | $ | 58 | ||||
Interest cost |
11 | 22 | ||||||
Net periodic cost |
$ | 40 | $ | 80 | ||||
Note 9. Comprehensive Income
The components of the Companys comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes, for the three-
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 5,728 | $ | 5,131 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 10,409 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available-for-sale
with other-than-temporary impairment |
(964 | ) | (164 | ) | (21 | ) | 3 | |||||||||
Unrealized
gain on securities available-for-sale without other-than-temporary impairment |
6,357 | 5,435 | 12,479 | 13,319 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income |
(2,574 | ) | (1,201 | ) | (5,060 | ) | (1,451 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for credit related other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings |
| 185 | 527 | 185 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on derivative contract |
| 596 | 30 | 1,020 | ||||||||||||
Income tax effect |
(1,050 | ) | (1,807 | ) | (2,963 | ) | (4,871 | ) | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
1,769 | 3,044 | 4,992 | 8,205 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 7,497 | $ | 8,175 | $ | 16,471 | $ | 18,614 | ||||||||
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is a defendant in various legal actions and asserted
claims. While the Company and its legal counsel are unable to assess the ultimate outcome of each
of these matters with certainty, the Company believes the resolution of these actions, singly or in
the aggregate, should not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company.
Note 11. Segment Information
The Company operates within two business segments, Community Banking and Insurance Services. The
Community Banking segment includes both commercial and consumer lending and deposit services. This
segment provides customers with such products as commercial loans, real estate loans, business
financing, and consumer loans. This segment also provides customers with a range of deposit
products including demand deposit accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit. In
addition, the Community Banking segment provides wealth management services to a broad range of
customers. The Insurance Services segment is a full-service insurance agency providing commercial
and personal lines of insurance.
- 24 -
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth information about the reportable operating segments and
reconciliation of this information to the consolidated financial statements at and for the
three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Community | Insurance | Parent/ | ||||||||||||||
Banking | Services | Elimination | Total | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) |
$ | 17,864 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (79 | ) | $ | 17,754 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,079 | | | 3,079 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income (loss) |
9,920 | 1,584 | (141 | ) | 11,363 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense (income) |
16,357 | 1,542 | (161 | ) | 17,738 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
8,348 | 11 | (59 | ) | 8,300 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
2,587 | 4 | (19 | ) | 2,572 | |||||||||||
Net income
(loss) |
5,761 | 7 | (40 | ) | 5,728 | |||||||||||
Preferred dividend |
| | 131 | 131 | ||||||||||||
Net income to common shareholders |
$ | 5,761 | $ | 7 | $ | (171 | ) | $ | 5,597 | |||||||
End of period goodwill and other intangibles |
$ | 78,339 | $ | 11,998 | $ | | $ | 90,337 | ||||||||
End of period assets |
$ | 2,184,336 | $ | 12,836 | $ | 9,228 | $ | 2,206,400 | ||||||||
For the Six Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Community | Insurance | Parent/ | ||||||||||||||
Banking | Services | Elimination | Total | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) |
$ | 36,210 | $ | (69 | ) | $ | (112 | ) | $ | 36,029 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
4,691 | | | 4,691 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income (loss) |
17,724 | 3,550 | (412 | ) | 20,862 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense (income) |
33,293 | 3,067 | (559 | ) | 35,801 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
15,950 | 414 | 35 | 16,399 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
4,738 | 163 | 19 | 4,920 | ||||||||||||
Net income
(loss) |
11,212 | 251 | 16 | 11,479 | ||||||||||||
Preferred dividend |
| | 131 | 131 | ||||||||||||
Net income to common shareholders |
$ | 11,212 | $ | 251 | $ | (115 | ) | $ | 11,348 | |||||||
End of period goodwill and other intangibles |
$ | 78,339 | $ | 11,998 | $ | | $ | 90,337 | ||||||||
End of period assets |
$ | 2,184,336 | $ | 12,836 | $ | 9,228 | $ | 2,206,400 | ||||||||
For the Three Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Community | Insurance | Parent/ | ||||||||||||||
Banking | Services | Elimination | Total | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) |
$ | 18,581 | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 18,542 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,596 | | | 3,596 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
7,431 | 1,408 | 65 | 8,904 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense (income) |
15,362 | 1,402 | (166 | ) | 16,598 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
7,054 | (18 | ) | 216 | 7,252 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
2,014 | (19 | ) | 126 | 2,121 | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 5,040 | $ | 1 | $ | 90 | $ | 5,131 | ||||||||
End of period goodwill and other intangibles |
$ | 79,057 | $ | 11,700 | $ | | $ | 90,757 | ||||||||
End of period assets |
$ | 2,227,198 | $ | 12,163 | $ | 7,485 | $ | 2,246,846 | ||||||||
- 25 -
Table of Contents
For the Six Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Community | Insurance | Parent/ | ||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Banking | Services | Elimination | Total | ||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) |
$ | 37,259 | $ | (57 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 37,161 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
7,261 | | | 7,261 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income (loss) |
14,040 | 3,627 | (185 | ) | 17,482 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense (income) |
30,383 | 2,881 | (594 | ) | 32,670 | |||||||||||
Iincome before income taxes |
13,655 | 689 | 368 | 14,712 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
3,883 | 272 | 148 | 4,303 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,772 | $ | 417 | $ | 220 | $ | 10,409 | ||||||||
End of period goodwill and other intangibles |
$ | 79,057 | $ | 11,700 | $ | | $ | 90,757 | ||||||||
End of period assets |
$ | 2,227,198 | $ | 12,163 | $ | 7,485 | $ | 2,246,846 | ||||||||
Note 12. Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes
that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for
the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for
the asset or liability. The price in the principal, or most advantageous, market used to measure
the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly
transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the
measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions
involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are
buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able
to transact, and (iv) willing to transact.
The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Inputs | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. | ||
Level 2 Inputs | Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, and credit risks, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means. | ||
Level 3 Inputs | Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well
as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth
below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Companys assets and liabilities
carried at fair value. In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available.
If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon third party models that
primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to
ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts
to reflect counterparty credit quality, the Companys creditworthiness, among other things, as well
as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The
Companys valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative
of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the
Companys valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants,
the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial
instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities Available-for-Sale: Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair
value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. Securities are classified as Level 1 within the
valuation hierarchy when quoted prices are available in an active
- 26 -
Table of Contents
market.
This includes securities whose value is based on quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets. The Company also uses Level 1 inputs for the valuation of equity securities traded in active markets.
Securities are classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy when the Company obtains fair
value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider
observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U. S. Treasury
yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit
information, and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things. Level 2 inputs are used to
value U. S. Agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities, single issue trust
preferred securities, pooled trust preferred securities, and certain equity securities that are not
actively traded.
Other Assets and Associated Liabilities: Securities held for trading purposes are recorded at fair
value and included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Securities held for
trading purposes include assets related to employee deferred compensation plans. The assets
associated with these plans are generally invested in equities and classified as Level 1. Deferred
compensation liabilities, also classified as Level 1, are carried at the fair value of the
obligation to the employee, which corresponds to the fair value of the invested assets.
Derivatives: Derivatives are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The Company obtains
dealer quotations based on observable data to value its derivatives.
Impaired Loans: Certain impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral
if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 3
inputs based on appraisals adjusted for customized discounting criteria.
The Company maintains an active and robust problem credit identification system. When a credit is
identified as exhibiting characteristics of weakening, the Company will assess the credit for
potential impairment. Examples of weakening include delinquency and deterioration of the borrowers
capacity to repay as determined by the Companys regular credit review function. As part of the
impairment review, the Company will evaluate the current collateral value. It is the Companys
standard practice to obtain updated third party collateral valuations to assist management in
measuring potential impairment of a credit and the amount of the impairment to be recorded.
Internal collateral valuations are generally performed within two to four weeks of the original
identification of potential impairment and receipt of the third party valuation. The internal
valuation is performed by comparing the original appraisal to current local real estate market
conditions and experience with consideration of liquidation costs. The result of the internal
valuation is compared to the outstanding loan balance, and, if warranted, a specific impairment
reserve will be established at the completion of the internal evaluation.
A third party evaluation is typically received within thirty to forty-five days of the completion
of the internal evaluation. Once received, the third party evaluation is reviewed by Special Assets
staff and/or Credit Appraisal staff for reasonableness. Once the evaluation is reviewed and
accepted, discounts to fair market value are applied based upon such factors as the banks
historical liquidation experience of like collateral, and an estimated net realizable value is
established. That estimated net realizable value is then compared to the outstanding loan balance
to determine the amount of specific impairment reserve. The specific impairment reserve, if
necessary, is adjusted to reflect the results of the updated evaluation. A specific impairment
reserve is generally maintained on impaired loans during the time period while awaiting receipt of
the third party evaluation as well as on impaired loans that continue to make some form of payment
and liquidation is not imminent. Impaired loans not meeting the aforementioned criteria and that do not have a specific impairment
reserve have usually been previously written down through a partial charge-off, to their net
realizable value.
Generally, the only difference between current appraised value, adjusted for liquidation costs, and
the carrying amount of the loan less the specific reserve is any downward adjustment to the
appraised value that the Company determines appropriate. These differences generally consist of
costs to sell the property, as well as a deflator for the devaluation of property seen by bank
sellers. The Company considers these factors in fair value adjustments.
In the Companys experience, it rarely returns loans to performing status after they have been
partially charged off. Generally, credits identified as impaired move quickly through the process
towards ultimate resolution.
Other Real Estate Owned. The fair value of the Companys other real estate owned is determined
using current and prior appraisals, estimates of costs to sell, and proprietary qualitative
adjustments. Accordingly, other real estate owned is stated at a Level 3 fair value.
- 27 -
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, segregated by the level of the
valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
$ | | $ | 150,926 | $ | | $ | 150,926 | ||||||||
Non-Agency Alt-A residential MBS |
| 11,256 | | 11,256 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 126,780 | | 126,780 | ||||||||||||
FDIC-backed securities |
| 13,802 | | 13,802 | ||||||||||||
Single issue trust preferred securities |
| 46,597 | | 46,597 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
595 | 20 | | 615 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 595 | $ | 349,381 | $ | | $ | 349,976 | ||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
$ | 3,188 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,188 | ||||||||
Derivative assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
| 39 | | 39 | ||||||||||||
Total derivative assets |
$ | | $ | 39 | $ | | $ | 39 | ||||||||
Deferred compensation liabilities |
$ | 3,188 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,188 | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
| 7 | | 7 | ||||||||||||
Total derivative liabilities |
$ | | $ | 7 | $ | | $ | 7 | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Agency securities |
$ | | $ | 9,832 | $ | | $ | 9,832 | ||||||||
Agency mortgage-backed securities |
| 215,013 | | 215,013 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency Alt-A residential MBS |
| 11,277 | | 11,277 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 176,138 | | 176,138 | ||||||||||||
FDIC-backed securities |
25,660 | 25,660 | ||||||||||||||
Single issue trust preferred securities |
| 41,244 | | 41,244 | ||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
| 264 | | 264 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
616 | 20 | | 636 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 616 | $ | 479,448 | $ | | $ | 480,064 | ||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
$ | 3,192 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,192 | ||||||||
Derivative assets |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
| 28 | | 28 | ||||||||||||
Total derivative assets |
$ | | $ | 28 | $ | | $ | 28 | ||||||||
Deferred compensation liabilities |
$ | 3,192 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,192 | ||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
| 31 | | 31 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate lock commitments |
| 59 | | 59 | ||||||||||||
Total derivative liabilities |
$ | | $ | 90 | $ | | $ | 90 | ||||||||
- 28 -
Table of Contents
Certain financial and non-financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis;
thus, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair
value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as, when there is evidence of impairment. Items
subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are as
follows:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | Total | |||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 6,580 | $ | 6,580 | ||||||||
Restructured loans |
| | 7,600 | 7,600 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
| | 5,585 | 5,585 |
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | Total | |||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
$ | | $ | | $ | 10,906 | $ | 10,906 | ||||||||
Restructured loans |
| | 5,771 | 5,771 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
| | 4,910 | 4,910 |
- 29 -
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet,
for which it is practical to estimate the value is based upon the characteristics of the
instruments and relevant market information. Financial instruments include cash, evidence of
ownership in an entity, or contracts that convey or impose on an entity that contractual right or
obligation to either receive or deliver cash for another financial instrument. Fair value is the
amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a
forced sale or liquidation, and is best evidenced by a quoted market price if one exists.
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 230,619 | $ | 230,619 | $ | 112,189 | $ | 112,189 | ||||||||
Investment securities |
354,082 | 354,133 | 484,701 | 484,768 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
920 | 924 | 4,694 | 4,700 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for investment, less allowance |
1,347,462 | 1,371,895 | 1,359,724 | 1,370,173 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
6,202 | 6,202 | 7,675 | 7,675 | ||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
43,607 | 43,607 | 42,241 | 42,241 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial assets |
39 | 39 | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Deferred compensation assets |
3,188 | 3,188 | 3,192 | 3,192 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 219,488 | $ | 219,488 | $ | 205,151 | $ | 205,151 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
271,622 | 271,622 | 262,420 | 262,420 | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
405,409 | 405,409 | 426,547 | 426,547 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
683,157 | 692,867 | 726,837 | 735,332 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
137,778 | 144,173 | 140,894 | 161,100 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,872 | 2,872 | 3,264 | 3,264 | ||||||||||||
FHLB and other indebtedness |
166,179 | 177,903 | 191,193 | 203,539 | ||||||||||||
Derivative financial liabilities |
7 | 7 | 90 | 90 | ||||||||||||
Deferred compensation liabilities |
3,188 | 3,188 | 3,192 | 3,192 |
The following summary presents the methodologies and assumptions used to estimate the fair
value of the Companys financial instruments presented below. The information used to determine
fair value is highly subjective and judgmental in nature and, therefore, the results may not be
precise. Subjective factors include, among other things, estimates of cash flows, risk
characteristics, credit quality, and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. Since the
fair value is estimated as of the balance sheet date, the amounts that will actually be realized or
paid upon settlement or maturity on these various instruments could be significantly different.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The book values of cash and due from banks and federal funds sold and
purchased are considered to be equal to fair value as a result of the short-term nature of these
items.
Investment Securities and Deferred Compensation Assets and Liabilities: Fair values are determined
in the same manner as described above.
Loans: The estimated fair value of loans held for investment is measured based upon discounted
future cash flows using current rates for similar loans. Loans held for sale are recorded at lower
of cost or estimated fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined based upon the
market sales price of similar loans.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable: The book value is considered to be equal to the fair value
due to the short-term nature of the instrument.
Bank-owned Life Insurance: The fair value is determined by stated contract values.
- 30 -
Table of Contents
Derivative Financial Instruments: The estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments is
based upon the current market price for similar instruments.
Deposits and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase: Deposits without a stated maturity,
including demand, interest-bearing demand, and savings accounts, are reported at their carrying
value. No value has been assigned to the franchise value of these deposits. For other types of
deposits and repurchase agreements with fixed maturities and rates, fair value has been
estimated by discounting future cash flows based on interest rates currently being offered on
instruments with similar characteristics and maturities.
FHLB and Other Indebtedness: Fair value has been estimated based on interest rates currently
available to the Company for borrowings with similar characteristics and maturities. The fair value
for trust preferred obligations has been estimated based on credit spreads seen in the marketplace
for like issues.
Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees: The amount of
off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees
is considered equal to fair value. Because of the uncertainty involved in attempting to assess the
likelihood and timing of commitments being drawn upon, coupled with the lack of an established
market and the wide diversity of fee structures, the Company does not believe it is meaningful to
provide an estimate of fair value that differs from the given value of the commitment.
Note 13. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The Company, through its mortgage banking and risk management operations, is party to various
derivative instruments that are used for asset and liability management and customers financing
needs. Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet.
The primary derivatives that the Company uses are interest rate swaps and interest rate lock
commitments (IRLCs). Generally, these instruments help the Company manage exposure to market
risk and meet customer financing needs. Market risk represents the possibility that economic value
or net interest income will be adversely affected by fluctuations in external factors, such as
interest rates, market-driven loan rates and prices or other economic factors.
The following table presents the aggregate contractual, or notional, amounts of derivative
financial instruments as of the dates indicated:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | | $ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||||||
IRLCs |
3,500 | 7,566 | 6,823 |
As of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010, the fair values of the Companys
derivatives were as follows:
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Location | Value | Location | Value | Location | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
IRLCs |
Other assets | $ | 39 | Other assets | $ | 28 | Other assets | $ | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 39 | $ | 28 | $ | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||
- 31 -
Table of Contents
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | Balance Sheet | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||
Location | Value | Location | Value | Location | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Other liabilities | $ | | Other liabilities | $ | 31 | Other liabilities | $ | 1,093 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | | $ | 31 | $ | 1,093 | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
IRLCs |
Other liabilities | $ | 7 | Other liabilities | $ | 59 | Other liabilities | $ | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7 | $ | 59 | $ | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 7 | $ | 90 | $ | 1,115 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swaps. The Company uses interest rate swap contracts to modify its exposure to
interest rate risk. The Company had a derivative interest rate swap instrument that ended in
January 2011. The Company employed a cash flow hedging strategy to effectively convert certain
floating-rate liabilities into fixed-rate instruments. The interest rate swap was accounted for
under the short-cut method as required by the Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815 of the ASC.
Changes in fair value of the interest rate swap were reported as a component of other comprehensive
income. The Company does not currently employ fair value hedging strategies.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments. In the normal course of business, the Company sells originated
mortgage loans into the secondary mortgage loan market. During the period of loan origination and
prior to the sale of the loans in the secondary market, the Company has exposure to movements in
interest rates associated with mortgage loans that are in the mortgage pipeline. A pipeline loan
is one on which the potential borrower has set the interest rate for the loan by entering into an
IRLC. Once a mortgage loan is closed and funded, it is included within loans held for sale and
awaits sale and delivery into the secondary market. During the term of an IRLC, the Company has the
risk that interest rates will change from the rate quoted to the borrower.
The Companys balance of mortgage loans held for sale is subject to changes in fair value due to
fluctuations in interest rates from the loan closing date through the date of sale of the loan into
the secondary market. Typically, the fair value of these loans declines when interest rates
increase and rises when interest rates decrease.
Effect of Derivatives and Hedging Activities on the Income Statement
For the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company has determined there was no amount of
ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges. The following table details gains and losses recognized in
income on non-designated hedging instruments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2011 and 2010.
Amount of Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not | Location of Gain (Loss) | Recognized in Income on Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||
Designated as Hedging | Recognized in Income on | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
Instruments | Derivative | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
IRLCs |
Other income | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 79 | $ | 63 | $ | 102 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | (18 | ) | $ | 79 | $ | 63 | $ | 102 | |||||||||||
Counterparty Credit Risk. Like other financial instruments, derivatives contain an element of
credit risk. Credit risk is the possibility that the Company will incur a loss because a
counterparty, which may be a bank, a broker-dealer or a customer, fails to meet its contractual
obligations. This risk is measured as the expected positive replacement value of contracts. All
derivative contracts may be executed only with exchanges or counterparties approved by the
Companys Asset/Liability Management Committee. The Company reviews its counterparty risk regularly
and has determined that, as of June 30, 2011, there is no significant counterparty credit risk.
- 32 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Unless the context suggests otherwise, the terms First Community, Company, we, our, and
us refer to First Community Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries as a consolidated entity.
The following discussion and analysis is provided to address information about the Companys
financial condition and results of operations for the periods covered. This discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K
(2010 Form 10-K) and the other financial information
included in this report.
The Company is a multi-state financial holding company headquartered in Bluefield, Virginia, with
total assets of $2.21 billion at June 30, 2011. Through its community bank subsidiary, First
Community Bank (the Bank), the Company provides financial, trust and investment advisory services
to individuals and commercial customers through 54 locations in Virginia, West Virginia, North
Carolina, and Tennessee. The Company is also the parent of GreenPoint Insurance Group, Inc.
(GreenPoint), a North Carolina based full-service insurance agency offering commercial and
personal lines of insurance. The Bank is the parent of Investment Planning Consultants, Inc. (IPC), a
registered investment advisory firm that offers wealth management and investment advice. The
Companys common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol, FCBC.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Company may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including
statements contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (including
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Exhibits hereto and thereto), in its reports to
stockholders and in other communications which are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to
the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to the Companys
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, anticipations, estimates and
intentions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based
on various factors (many of which are beyond the Companys control). The words may, could,
should, would, believe, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, plan, and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that the
forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of
known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in
many instances, beyond our control. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ
materially from those contemplated, expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements. The
following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ materially from
that expressed in such forward-looking statements:
| The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations; | ||
| Geopolitical conditions, including acts or threats of terrorism, actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and/or military conflicts, which could impact business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad; | ||
| The effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve); | ||
| Inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; | ||
| The timely development of competitive new products and services and the acceptance of these products and services by new and existing customers; | ||
| The willingness of users to substitute competitors products and services for our products and services; | ||
| The impact of changes in financial services policies, laws and regulations, including laws, regulations and policies concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance, and the application thereof by regulatory bodies; | ||
| Technological changes; | ||
| The effect of acquisitions we may make, including, without limitation, the failure to achieve the expected revenue growth and/or expense savings from such acquisitions; | ||
| The growth and profitability of noninterest or fee income being less than expected; | ||
| Changes in the level of our non-performing assets and charge-offs; | ||
| The effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted from time to time by bank regulatory agencies, the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting standards setters; | ||
| Possible other-than-temporary impairments of securities held by us; | ||
| The impact of current governmental efforts to restructure the U. S. financial regulatory system, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act); |
- 33 -
Table of Contents
| Changes in consumer spending and savings habits; and | ||
| Unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings. |
If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and statements proves
incorrect, then our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and other reports filed by us with the SEC. Therefore, we caution you not to
place undue reliance on our forward-looking information and statements.
The Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. The Company
does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be
made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company. These factors and other risks and
uncertainties are discussed in Item 1A., Risk Factors, in Part II of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U. S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and conform to general practices within the banking
industry. The Companys financial position and results of operations are affected by managements
application of accounting policies, including judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues, expenses and related disclosures.
Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the
Companys consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.
Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary principally when assets and liabilities are
required to be recorded at estimated fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset carried on
the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded based upon the probability of
occurrence of a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in
more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation
adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are
provided by third party sources, when available. When third party information is not available,
valuation adjustments are estimated by management primarily through the use of financial modeling
techniques and appraisal estimates.
The Companys accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation. The disclosures presented in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements and in Managements Discussion and Analysis provide
information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and
how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of
financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts,
management has identified the accounting for and valuation of investment securities, the
determination of the allowance for loan losses, accounting for acquisitions and intangible assets,
and accounting for income taxes as the four accounting areas that require the most subjective or
complex judgments. The identified critical accounting policies are described in detail in the
Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
The Company is a financial holding company which operates within the four-state region of Virginia,
West Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. The Company operates through the Bank, IPC, and
GreenPoint to offer a wide range of financial services. The Company reported total assets of $2.21
billion at June 30, 2011.
The Company funds its lending activities primarily through the retail deposit operations of its
branch banking network. Retail and wholesale repurchase agreements and borrowings from the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) provide additional funding as needed. The Company invests its funds
primarily in loans to retail and commercial customers. In addition to loans, the Company invests a
portion of its funds in various debt securities, including those of United States agencies, state
and political subdivisions, and certain corporate notes and debt instruments. The Company also
maintains overnight interest-bearing balances with the Federal Reserve and other correspondent
banks. The difference between interest earned on assets and interest paid on liabilities is the
Companys primary source of earnings. The Companys net interest income is supplemented by fees for services,
commissions on sales, and various deposit service charges.
The Company also conducts asset management activities through the Banks Trust and Financial
Services Division (Trust Division) and its registered investment advisory firm, IPC. The Banks
Trust Division and IPC manage assets with an
- 34 -
Table of Contents
aggregate market value of $892 million as of June 30, 2011. These assets are not assets of the
Company, but are managed under various fee-based arrangements as fiduciary or agent.
RECENT LEGISLATION
On July 21, 2010, sweeping financial regulatory reform legislation entitled the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law by President
Obama. The Dodd-Frank Act implements far-reaching changes across the financial regulatory
landscape, including provisions that, among other things, will:
| Centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws. | ||
| Require financial holding companies, such as First Community, to be well-capitalized and well-managed as of July 21, 2011. Bank holding companies and banks must also be both well-capitalized and well-managed in order to engage in interstate bank acquisitions. | ||
| Impose comprehensive regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market, which would include certain provisions that would effectively prohibit insured depository institutions from conducting certain derivatives businesses in the institutions themselves. | ||
| Implement corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders. | ||
| Make permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and increase the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000 and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013 for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions. | ||
| Repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts. | ||
| Amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to, among other things, give the Federal Reserve the authority to establish rules regarding interchange fees charged for electronic debit transactions by payment card issuers having assets over $10 billion and to enforce a new statutory requirement that such fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer. | ||
| Increase the authority of the Federal Reserve to examine bank holding companies, such as First Community, and their non-bank subsidiaries. |
Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several
years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on the Company, its customers
or the financial industry generally. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance
assessments, payment of interest on demand deposits and interchange fees could increase the costs
associated with deposits as well as place limitations on certain revenues those deposits may
generate.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The following includes significant developments regarding the Company and its operations in the
second quarter and first half of 2011:
| Net income increased $597 thousand, or 11.64%, to $5.73 million for the second quarter of 2011, as compared to the second quarter of 2010. | ||
| Return on average assets for the second quarter of 2011 improved to 1.02%, as compared to 0.91% for the second quarter of 2010. | ||
| The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 129 basis points for the second quarter of 2011, an improvement of 3 basis points from year-end 2010. |
- 35 -
Table of Contents
Net Income
Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended June 30, 2011, was $5.60
million, or $0.31 per diluted common share, compared with net income
available to common shareholders of
$5.13 million, or $0.29 per diluted common share, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of $466 thousand. The increase in net income was primarily due to net gains on the sale of
securities, a decrease in the provision for loan losses, and the reduction of interest on deposits
and borrowings, which were partially offset by the increase in other operating expenses and reduction of interest on
earning assets.
Net income available to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011, was $11.35
million, or $0.63 per diluted common share, compared with net income
available to common shareholders of
$10.41 million, or $0.59 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an
increase of $939 thousand. The increase in net income was primarily due to net gains on the sale of
securities, a decrease in the provision for loan losses, and the reduction of interest on deposits
and borrowings, which were partially offset by the increase in other operating expenses, reduction of interest on earning
assets, and increase in salaries and employee benefits.
Net Interest Income Quarterly Comparison (See Table I)
Net interest income, the largest contributor to earnings, was $17.75 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, compared with $18.54 million for the corresponding period in 2010, a decrease
of $788 thousand, or 4.25%. Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $18.49 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $843 thousand, or 4.36%, from $19.33 million for the
corresponding period in 2010. The decrease in tax-equivalent net
interest income was largely due to
decreases in average earning assets and the interest earned on those assets as a result of a
sustained low rate environment.
Average earning assets decreased $40.65 million while average interest-bearing liabilities
decreased $88.89 million during the second quarter of 2011 compared with the same period of 2010.
The yield on average earning assets decreased 48 basis points to 4.99% from 5.47% between the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total cost of interest-bearing
liabilities decreased 39 basis points between the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, which resulted
in a net interest rate spread that was 9 basis points lower, at 3.66%, for the second quarter of
2011 compared with 3.75% for the same period last year. The Companys tax-equivalent net interest
margin of 3.83% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, decreased 9 basis points from 3.92% for
the same period of 2010.
The yield on loans decreased 16 basis points to 5.88% from 6.04% for the three months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax-equivalent loan interest income for the second quarter of 2011
decreased $905 thousand, or 4.30%, compared with the second quarter of 2010 due to the effect of
the extended low interest rate environment in the United States and reduction in loans stemming from significant prepayments and scheduled amortization of loans.
The tax-equivalent yield on available-for-sale securities decreased 68 basis points to 3.93% during
the three months ended June 30, 2011, while the average balance decreased by $116.50 million, or
23.35%, compared with the same period in 2010. The average balance of the held-to-maturity
securities portfolio continued to decline as securities matured or were called and were not
replaced.
Average interest-bearing balances with banks were $174.78 million during the second quarter of
2011, and the yield was 0.23%. Interest-bearing balances with banks are comprised largely of excess
liquidity kept at the Federal Reserve and bear overnight market rates.
The average balances of interest-bearing demand deposits increased $31.40 million, or 12.64%, while
the average rate paid during the second quarter of 2011 decreased 24 basis points when compared
with the same period in 2010. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the average balances of
savings deposits decreased $7.23 million, or 1.71%, while the average rate paid decreased 51 basis
points compared to the same period in 2010. Average time deposits decreased $70.92 million, or
9.30%, while the average rate paid on time deposits decreased 45 basis points from 2.14% in the
second quarter of 2010 to 1.69% in the second quarter of 2011. The level of average
noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $12.01 million, or 5.79%, to $219.40 million during
the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared with the corresponding period of the prior year. During
the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company reduced the level of time deposit only customer relationships
during the same period.
- 36 -
Table of Contents
The average balance of retail repurchase agreements,
which consist of collateralized retail deposits and commercial treasury accounts, decreased $12.46 million, or
13.23%, to $81.74 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared with the same period in 2010. During this same
period, the interest rate paid on the retail repurchase agreements decreased 38 basis points to 0.69%. The decrease
in the average balance of retail repurchase agreements is largely attributed to customers converting retail repurchase
agreements to time deposit and lower balances in commercial treasury accounts in the slow economy. There were no federal
funds purchased on average during the second quarters of 2011 and 2010. Wholesale repurchase agreements remained
unchanged at $50.00 million and the rate remained at 3.75% for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010. The average
balance of FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt decreased by $29.68 million, or 15.16%, in the second quarter
of 2011 to $166.12 million, compared with the same period in 2010, while the rate paid on those borrowings
increased 44 basis points between the periods.
Net Interest Income Year-to-Date Comparison (See Table II)
Net interest income was $36.03 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared with $37.16
million for the corresponding period in 2010, a decrease of $1.13 million, or 3.05%. Tax-equivalent
net interest income totaled $37.63 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of
$1.13 million, or 2.92%, from $38.76 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The decrease in
tax-equivalent net interest income was largely due to decreases in
average earning assets and
decreases in the interest earned on those assets as a result of a sustained low rate
environment.
Average earning assets decreased $19.94 million while interest-bearing liabilities decreased $67.77
million during the first half of 2011 compared with the same period of 2010. The yield on average
earning assets decreased 44 basis points to 5.13% from 5.57% between the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. Total cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 37 basis points
between the first six months of 2011 and 2010, which resulted in a net interest rate spread that was 7
basis points lower, at 3.73%, for the first half of 2011 compared with 3.80% for the same period
last year. The Companys tax-equivalent net interest margin of 3.89% for the six months ended June
30, 2011, decreased 8 basis points from 3.97% for the same period of 2010.
The yield on loans decreased 19 basis points to 5.94% from 6.13% for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. Tax-equivalent loan interest income for the first half of 2011
decreased $1.81 million, or 4.26%, compared with the first half of 2010 due to the effect of the
extended low interest rate environment in the United States and reduction in loan volume.
The tax-equivalent yield on available-for-sale securities decreased 70 basis points to 4.06% during
the six months ended June 30, 2011, while the average balance decreased by $65.96 million, or
13.46%, compared with the same period in 2010. The average balance of the held-to-maturity
securities portfolio continued to decline as securities matured or were called and were not
replaced.
Average interest-bearing balances with banks were $141.66 million during the first half of 2011,
and the yield was 0.24%. Interest-bearing balances with banks are comprised largely of excess
liquidity kept at the Federal Reserve and bear overnight market rates.
The average balances of interest-bearing demand deposits increased $33.25 million, or 13.71%, while
the average rate paid during the first half of 2011 decreased 13 basis points when compared with
the same period in 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the average balances of savings
deposits increased $3.67 million, or 0.88%, while the average
rate paid decreased 49 basis points
compared to the same period in 2010. Average time deposits decreased $71.64 million, or 9.22%,
while the average rate paid on time deposits decreased 44 basis points from 2.22% in the first half
of 2010 to 1.78% in the first half of 2011. The level of average noninterest-bearing demand
deposits increased $12.42 million, or 6.11%, to $215.67 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011, compared with the corresponding period of the prior year.
The average balance of retail repurchase agreements, which
consist of collateralized retail deposits and commercial treasury accounts, decreased $7.90 million, or 8.49%, to
$85.19 million for the first half of 2011 compared with the same period in 2010. During this same period, the
interest rate paid on the retail repurchase agreements decreased 40 basis points to 0.74%. The decrease in the
average balance of retail repurchase agreements is largely attributed to customers converting retail repurchase
agreements to time deposit and lower balances in commercial treasury accounts in the slow economy. There were no
federal funds purchased on average during the first half of 2011 and 2010. Wholesale repurchase agreements remained
unchanged at $50.00 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, while the rate increased 2 basis points
between the two periods due to changes in the structure within those borrowings. The average balance of FHLB borrowings
and other long-term debt decreased by $25.15 million, or 12.75%, in the first half of 2011 to $172.12 million compared
to the same period in 2010, while the rate paid on those borrowings increased 47 basis points between the periods. The
Company prepaid a $25.00 million FHLB advance that carried a 4.00% interest rate during the first quarter of 2011.
- 37 -
Table of Contents
Table I
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) |
$ | 1,373,988 | $ | 20,134 | 5.88 | % | $ | 1,397,528 | $ | 21,039 | 6.04 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale |
382,385 | 3,747 | 3.93 | % | 498,880 | 5,728 | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
4,321 | 90 | 8.35 | % | 6,928 | 145 | 8.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
174,776 | 100 | 0.23 | % | 72,782 | 34 | 0.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
1,935,470 | 24,071 | 4.99 | % | 1,976,118 | 26,946 | 5.47 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
261,221 | 281,473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,196,691 | $ | 2,257,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 279,912 | $ | 113 | 0.16 | % | $ | 248,512 | $ | 250 | 0.40 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
414,439 | 241 | 0.23 | % | 421,669 | 781 | 0.74 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
691,941 | 2,919 | 1.69 | % | 762,858 | 4,075 | 2.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,386,292 | 3,273 | 0.95 | % | 1,433,039 | 5,106 | 1.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail repurchase agreements |
81,736 | 141 | 0.69 | % | 94,197 | 252 | 1.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale repurchase agreements |
50,000 | 468 | 3.75 | % | 50,000 | 468 | 3.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other indebtedness |
166,121 | 1,699 | 4.10 | % | 195,804 | 1,787 | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
297,857 | 2,308 | 3.11 | % | 340,001 | 2,507 | 2.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,684,149 | 5,581 | 1.33 | % | 1,773,040 | 7,613 | 1.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
219,402 | 207,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
1,666 | 10,940 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
291,474 | 266,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 2,196,691 | $ | 2,257,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income, tax-equivalent |
$ | 18,490 | $ | 19,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread (3) |
3.66 | % | 3.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (4) |
3.83 | % | 3.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Fully taxable equivalent at the rate of 35% (FTE). The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefits of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory rate of 35% for each period presented. The Company believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. | |
(2) | Non-accrual loans are included in average balances outstanding but with no related interest income during the period of non-accrual. | |
(3) | Represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and cost of funds. | |
(4) | Represents tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets. |
- 38 -
Table of Contents
Table II
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | Balance | Interest (1) | Rate (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) |
$ | 1,378,233 | $ | 40,629 | 5.94 | % | $ | 1,396,603 | $ | 42,436 | 6.13 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale |
424,104 | 8,544 | 4.06 | % | 490,062 | 11,561 | 4.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
4,432 | 185 | 8.42 | % | 7,033 | 293 | 8.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
141,662 | 169 | 0.24 | % | 74,675 | 80 | 0.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
1,948,431 | 49,527 | 5.13 | % | 1,968,373 | 54,370 | 5.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
263,457 | 282,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,211,888 | $ | 2,250,736 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 275,781 | $ | 324 | 0.24 | % | $ | 242,531 | $ | 450 | 0.37 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
421,046 | 598 | 0.29 | % | 417,377 | 1,612 | 0.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
705,632 | 6,231 | 1.78 | % | 777,268 | 8,546 | 2.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,402,459 | 7,153 | 1.03 | % | 1,437,176 | 10,608 | 1.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail repurchase agreements |
85,191 | 314 | 0.74 | % | 93,093 | 528 | 1.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Wholesale repurchase agreements |
50,000 | 935 | 3.77 | % | 50,000 | 931 | 3.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other indebtedness |
172,117 | 3,494 | 4.09 | % | 197,266 | 3,539 | 3.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
307,308 | 4,743 | 3.11 | % | 340,359 | 4,998 | 2.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,709,767 | 11,896 | 1.40 | % | 1,777,535 | 15,606 | 1.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
215,669 | 203,252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,995 | 8,097 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
283,457 | 261,852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 2,211,888 | $ | 2,250,736 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income, tax-equivalent |
$ | 37,631 | $ | 38,764 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread (3) |
3.73 | % | 3.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (4) |
3.89 | % | 3.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Fully taxable equivalent at the rate of 35% (FTE). The FTE basis adjusts for the tax benefits of income on certain tax-exempt loans and investments using the federal statutory rate of 35% for each period presented. The Company believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income and provides relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. | |
(2) | Non-accrual loans are included in average balances outstanding but with no related interest income during the period of non-accrual. | |
(3) | Represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and cost of funds. | |
(4) | Represents tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets. |
- 39 -
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the changes in tax-equivalent interest earned and paid
detailing the amounts attributable to (i) changes in volume (change in the average volume times the
prior years average rate), (ii) changes in rate (changes in the average rate times the prior
years average volume), and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in the average volume column times
the change in average rate).
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011, Compared to 2010 | June 30, 2011, Compared to 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar Increase (Decrease) due to | Dollar Increase (Decrease) due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate/ | Rate/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | Volume | Rate | Volume | Total | Volume | Rate | Volume | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest earned on: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (FTE) |
$ | (354 | ) | $ | (560 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | (905 | ) | $ | (558 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,249 | ) | $ | (1,807 | ) | ||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale (FTE) |
(1,338 | ) | (839 | ) | 196 | (1,981 | ) | (1,556 | ) | 429 | (1,890 | ) | (3,017 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity (FTE) |
(54 | ) | (1 | ) | 0 | (55 | ) | (108 | ) | | 0 | (108 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
with other banks |
48 | 7 | 11 | 66 | 71 | (1,266 | ) | 1,284 | 89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
(1,698 | ) | (1,393 | ) | 217 | (2,875 | ) | (2,151 | ) | (837 | ) | (1,855 | ) | (4,843 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest paid on: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
32 | (150 | ) | (19 | ) | (137 | ) | 62 | (165 | ) | (23 | ) | (126 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
(13 | ) | (536 | ) | 9 | (540 | ) | 14 | (1,019 | ) | (9 | ) | (1,014 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
(379 | ) | (857 | ) | 80 | (1,156 | ) | (788 | ) | (1,682 | ) | 155 | (2,315 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Retail repurchase agreements |
(33 | ) | (90 | ) | 12 | (111 | ) | (45 | ) | (185 | ) | 16 | (214 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale repurchase
agreement |
| | | | | 4 | 0 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings and other
long-term debt |
(271 | ) | 216 | (33 | ) | (88 | ) | (451 | ) | 465 | (59 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
(664 | ) | (1,416 | ) | 49 | (2,032 | ) | (1,208 | ) | (2,582 | ) | 80 | (3,710 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in net interest income,
tax-equivalent |
$ | (1,034 | ) | $ | 23 | $ | 168 | $ | (843 | ) | $ | (943 | ) | $ | 1,745 | $ | (1,935 | ) | $ | (1,133 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
During the
last four years, there has been significant stress in both commercial and residential
real estate markets, resulting in significant declines in real estate valuations. Decreases in real estate
values adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for loans, including loans
originated by the Company. In addition, adverse changes in the economy, particularly continued high
rates of unemployment may have a negative effect on the ability of the Companys borrowers to make
timely loan payments. A further increase in loan delinquencies could adversely impact loan loss
experience, causing potential increases in the provision and allowance for loan losses.
The Companys allowance for loan losses was $26.48 million at June 30, 2011, $26.48 million at
December 31, 2010, and $25.01 million at June 30, 2010. The Companys allowance for loan loss
activity for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 26,482 | $ | 24,508 | $ | 26,482 | $ | 24,277 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,079 | 3,596 | 4,691 | 7,261 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(3,456 | ) | (3,373 | ) | (5,483 | ) | (7,105 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
377 | 280 | 792 | 578 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(3,079 | ) | (3,093 | ) | (4,691 | ) | (6,527 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 26,482 | $ | 25,011 | $ | 26,482 | $ | 25,011 | ||||||||
- 40 -
Table of Contents
The total allowance for loan losses to loans held for
investment ratio was 1.93% at June 30, 2011, compared with 1.91% at December 31, 2010, and 1.89% at June 30, 2010.
Management considers the allowance to be adequate based upon its analysis of the portfolio as of June 30, 2011.
Although management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the adequacy of the allowance is dependent
upon a variety of factors beyond the Companys control, including, among other things, the performance of the loan
portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.
In addition, the determination of the allowance for loan losses necessarily requires management to make various assumptions.
Therefore, actual loan losses could differ materially from managements determination if actual conditions differ
significantly from the assumptions utilized. While management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate as
of June 30, 2011, actual results may prove different and these differences could be significant. The allowance
methodology was recently enhanced to further segment the commercial loan portfolio by risk grade. Historical loss
rates for each risk grade are adjusted by environmental factors to estimate the amount of reserve needed by segment.
The Company believes this enhancement results in increased granularity within the allowance for loan losses and will
be more reflective of trends within the commercial loan portfolio.
During the second quarter and first half of 2011, the Company incurred net charge-offs of $3.08
million and $4.69 million, respectively, compared with $3.09 million and $6.53 million in the
respective periods of 2010. Annualized net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2011 were 0.90% of
the average loan balance, compared to 0.69% of the average loan
balance for the same period of 2010. The Company made provisions for loan losses of $3.08 million and $4.69
million, respectively, for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, compared to $3.60
million and $7.26 million, respectively, in the same period of 2010. Provisions for loan losses
covered 100.00% of net charge-offs for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011.
Total
delinquent loans as of June 30, 2011, measured 2.12% of total
loans, of which 0.52% were comprised of
loans 30-89 days delinquent and 1.60% were comprised of loans
in non-accrual status. Total delinquent loans have decreased
approximately $7.29 million, or 20.02%, since December 31, 2010.
Non-performing loans, comprised of non-accrual loans and unseasoned loan restructurings (as the
Company does not have any loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing), as a percentage of
total loans were 1.67% at June 30, 2011, 1.78% at December 31, 2010, and 1.35% at June 30, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, non-accrual loans, including acquired, impaired
non-accrual loans, were primarily composed of the following
categories of loans: 27.97% were single family residential mortgage;
24.07% were non-farm, non-residential
commercial loans; and 20.51% were commercial and industrial loans. Approximately $3.50 million, or
15.88%, of non-accrual loans is attributed to the TriStone loan portfolio that was acquired during
the third quarter of 2009.
During the second quarter of 2011, the company downgraded
a $4.60 million loan within the hospitality industry to substandard, which accounted for a majority of the increase in
sub-standard loans within the non-farm, non-residential loan segment.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income consists of all revenues that are not included in interest and fee income
related to earning assets. Total noninterest income for the second quarter of 2011 was $11.36
million compared with noninterest income of $8.90 million in the same period of 2010, an increase
of $2.46 million. Exclusive of the impact of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charges and
gains on the sale of securities, noninterest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, increased
$251 thousand, or 3.18%, compared to the same period in 2010. Wealth management revenues decreased
$82 thousand, or 8.10%, to $930 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared with
the same period in 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $6 thousand, or 0.18%, to
$3.35 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same period in 2010.
Other service charges and fees increased $211 thousand, or 16.88%, to $1.46 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same period in 2010. Insurance commissions for the
second quarter of 2011 were $1.56 million, an increase of $172 thousand, or 12.38%, from the
comparable period in 2010. Other operating income totaled $834 thousand for the three months ended
June 30, 2011, a decrease of $56 thousand, or 6.29%, compared with the same period in 2010. For the
quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized no OTTI charges, compared to $185 thousand of
OTTI charges related to two pooled trust preferred securities and several small equity holdings during the same
period of 2010. During the second quarter of 2011, net securities gains of $3.22 million were
realized compared with net gains of $1.20 million in the comparable period in 2010.
Noninterest income for the first half of 2011 was $20.86 million compared with noninterest income
of $17.48 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $3.38 million. Exclusive of the impact
of OTTI charges and gains on the sale of securities, noninterest income for the six months ended
June 30, 2011, increased $113 thousand, or 0.70%, compared to the same period in 2010. Wealth
management revenues decreased $73 thousand, or 3.85%, to $1.82 million for the first half of 2011,
compared with the same period in 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $45 thousand,
or 0.71%, to $6.38 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same period in
2010. Other service charges and fees increased $336 thousand, or 13.28%, to $2.87 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2011, compared with the same period in 2010. Insurance commissions for
the first half of 2011 were $3.50 million, a decrease of $86 thousand, or 2.40%, from the
comparable period in 2010. The decrease in insurance commissions reflects the effects of the recent
recession, as well as the soft insurance market. Other operating income totaled $1.75 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $109 thousand, or 5.86%, compared with the same
period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the
Company recognized $527 thousand of OTTI charges related to a non-agency mortgage-backed security, compared
to $185 thousand of OTTI charges related to two pooled trust preferred securities and several small equity holdings
during the same period of 2010.
- 41 -
Table of Contents
During the first half of 2011, net securities gains of $5.06
million were realized compared with net gains of $1.45 million in the comparable period in 2010.
Over the course of the first half of 2011, the Company strategically harvested gains in the investment portfolio as
changes in the interest rate environment presented opportunities. Additionally, approximately $967 thousand of the
gains realized during the period were recoveries of investment security impairments that occurred during 2009.
For a more detailed discussion of activities regarding investment securities and impairment
charges, please see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense totaled $17.74 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, an increase of
$1.14 million, or 6.87%, from the same period in 2010. Salaries and employee benefits for the
second quarter of 2011 increased $198 thousand, or 2.33%, compared to the same period in 2010.
Occupancy and furniture and equipment expenses decreased $11 thousand, or 0.44%, between the
comparable periods. Deposit insurance premiums and assessments were $414 thousand for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $296 thousand, or 41.69%, compared to the
same period in 2010, which was primarily due to the FDICs change in assessment methodology for
deposit insurance to one based on tangible assets. Other operating expense totaled $5.90 million
for the second quarter of 2011, an increase of $1.24 million, or 26.63%, from $4.66 million for the
second quarter of 2010. The increase in other operating expense was
primarily due to a $1.27 million increase in expenses and losses
associated with other real estate owned
between the comparable quarters.
Noninterest expense totaled $35.80 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of
$3.13 million, or 9.58%, from the same period in 2010. Salaries and employee benefits for the first
half of 2011 increased $1.36 million, or 8.25%, compared to the same period in 2010. The Company
has increased staffing levels in credit administration, marketing, and compliance due to increasing
regulatory burdens. The Company has also experienced a significant increase in health insurance
costs in recent quarters. Occupancy and furniture and equipment
expenses decreased $13 thousand, or 0.56%, between the comparable periods. Deposit insurance premiums and assessments were $1.29
million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $119 thousand, or 8.43%,
compared to the same period in 2010. Other operating expense totaled $10.67 million for the first
half of 2011, an increase of $1.47 million, or 16.01%, from $9.19 million for the first half of
2010. The increase in other operating expenses includes an increase
of $772 thousand in expenses and losses associated with other real
estate owned.
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company prepaid a $25.00 million FHLB advance, and the
expense associated with that prepayment was $471 thousand.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense is comprised of federal and state current and deferred income taxes on pre-tax
earnings of the Company. Income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income may vary significantly from
statutory rates due to items of income and expense which are excluded, by law, from the calculation
of taxable income. These items are commonly referred to as permanent differences. The most
significant permanent differences for the Company include income on municipal securities which are
exempt from federal income tax and the increases in the cash surrender values of life insurance
policies.
For the second quarter of 2011, income taxes were $2.57 million compared with income taxes of $2.12
million for the second quarter of 2010. For the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the
effective tax expense rates were 30.99% and 29.25%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30,
2011, income taxes were $4.92 million compared with $4.30 million for the same period of 2010. For
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the effective tax expense rates were 30.00% and
29.25%, respectively.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets at June 30, 2011, decreased $37.84 million, or 1.69%, to $2.21 billion from December
31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, cash and cash equivalents increased
$118.43 million since year-end 2010. At June 30, 2011, total
liabilities were $1.90 billion, a decrease of $70.16 million, or 3.55%, from December
31, 2010. Deposits decreased $41.28 million, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
decreased $3.12 million, and borrowings decreased $25.01 million during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011.
Securities
Available-for-sale securities were $349.98 million at June 30, 2011, compared with $480.06 million
at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $130.09 million, or 27.10%. The market value of securities
available-for-sale as a percentage of amortized cost improved from 96.40% at December 31, 2010, to
97.23% at June 30, 2011, reflecting improved pricing on certain issues. Held-to-maturity securities
declined to $4.11 million at June 30, 2011, compared with $4.64 million at December 31, 2010.
- 42 -
Table of Contents
During the
second quarter of 2011, the Company recognized no OTTI charges. For the first half of 2011, the Company recognized OTTI charges in earnings
related to a non-agency mortgage-backed security of $527 thousand. During the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized no OTTI charges on equity securities.
For a more detailed discussion of investment securities, please see Note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I.
Loan Portfolio
Loans Held for Sale
The $920 thousand balance of loans held for sale at June 30, 2011, represents mortgage loans that
are sold to investors on a best efforts basis. Accordingly, the Company does not retain the
interest rate risk involved in the commitment. The gross notional amount of outstanding commitments
to originate mortgage loans for customers at June 30, 2011, was $3.50 million on 22 loans.
Loans Held for Investment
Total loans held for investment were $1.37 billion at June 30, 2011, representing a decrease of
$12.26 million from December 31, 2010, and a decrease of $25.94 million from June 30, 2010. The
average loan to deposit ratio was 85.57% for the second quarter of 2011, compared with 85.54% for
the fourth quarter of 2010, and 85.19% for the second quarter of 2010. Year-to-date average loans
of $1.38 billion decreased $18.37 million when compared to year-to-date average loans of $1.40
billion in 2010.
The held for investment loan portfolio continues to be diversified among loan types and industry
segments. The following table presents the various loan categories and changes in composition as of
June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans Held for Investment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction commercial |
$ | 34,966 | 2.55 | % | $ | 42,694 | 3.08 | % | $ | 45,134 | 3.22 | % | ||||||||||||
Land development |
4,694 | 0.34 | % | 16,650 | 1.20 | % | 20,414 | 1.46 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other land loans |
23,354 | 1.70 | % | 24,468 | 1.77 | % | 27,313 | 1.95 | % | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
92,891 | 6.76 | % | 94,123 | 6.79 | % | 101,672 | 7.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Multi-family residential |
78,163 | 5.69 | % | 67,824 | 4.89 | % | 70,850 | 5.06 | % | |||||||||||||||
Non-farm, non-residential |
333,475 | 24.27 | % | 351,904 | 25.39 | % | 352,842 | 25.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
1,677 | 0.12 | % | 1,342 | 0.10 | % | 1,354 | 0.10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Farmland |
37,227 | 2.71 | % | 36,954 | 2.67 | % | 39,053 | 2.79 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
606,447 | 44.14 | % | 635,959 | 45.89 | % | 658,632 | 47.05 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer real estate loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines |
111,995 | 8.15 | % | 111,620 | 8.05 | % | 113,036 | 8.07 | % | |||||||||||||||
Single family residential mortgage |
560,527 | 40.80 | % | 549,157 | 39.61 | % | 536,540 | 38.33 | % | |||||||||||||||
Owner-occupied construction |
18,062 | 1.31 | % | 18,349 | 1.32 | % | 21,346 | 1.52 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total consumer real estate loans |
690,584 | 50.26 | % | 679,126 | 48.98 | % | 670,922 | 47.92 | % | |||||||||||||||
Consumer and other loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
64,692 | 4.71 | % | 63,475 | 4.58 | % | 62,659 | 4.48 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other |
12,221 | 0.89 | % | 7,646 | 0.55 | % | 7,672 | 0.55 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total consumer and other loans |
76,913 | 5.60 | % | 71,121 | 5.13 | % | 70,331 | 5.03 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,373,944 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,386,206 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,399,885 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans Held for Sale |
$ | 920 | $ | 4,694 | $ | 2,141 | ||||||||||||||||||
- 43 -
Table of Contents
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing assets include loans on non-accrual status, unseasoned loan restructurings, loans
contractually past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, and other real estate owned
(OREO). Non-performing assets were $28.50 million at June 30, 2011, $29.65 million at December
31, 2010, and $25.98 million at June 30, 2010. The percentage of non-performing assets to total
assets was 1.29% at June 30, 2011, 1.32% at December 31, 2010, and 1.16% at June 30, 2010.
The following table details non-performing assets by category at the close of each of the quarters
ended June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010.
(Dollars in Thousands) | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||
Non-accrual loans |
$ | 22,037 | $ | 19,414 | $ | 17,668 | ||||||
Restructured loans |
878 | 5,325 | 1,206 | |||||||||
Loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing interest |
| | | |||||||||
Total non-performing loans |
22,915 | 24,739 | 18,874 | |||||||||
Other real estate owned |
5,585 | 4,910 | 7,108 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 28,500 | $ | 29,649 | $ | 25,982 | ||||||
Restructured loans performing in accordance with
modified terms |
$ | 7,044 | $ | 3,911 | $ | 1,557 | ||||||
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans |
1.67 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.35 | % | ||||||
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets |
1.29 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total loans
and other real estate owned |
2.07 | % | 2.13 | % | 1.85 | % | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of
non-performing loans |
115.6 | % | 107.0 | % | 132.5 | % |
Ongoing activity within the classification and categories of non-performing loans include
collections on delinquencies, foreclosures, loan restructurings, and movements into or out of the
non-performing classification as a result of changing economic conditions, borrower financial
capacity, and resolution efforts on the part of the Company. There were no loans 90 days past due
and still accruing at June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, or June 30, 2010. OREO was $5.59 million
at June 30, 2011, an increase of $675 thousand from December 31, 2010, and is carried at the lesser
of estimated net realizable value or cost. OREO increased from December 31, 2010, as a result of
escalation in asset resolution and foreclosure activity. At June 30, 2011, OREO consisted of 49
properties with an average book value of $193 thousand and an average holding period of 7 months.
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, net losses on the sale of OREO
totaled $1.55 million and $1.70 million, respectively.
The Companys Special Assets staff assumes the management and monitoring of all loans determined to
be seriously delinquent or impaired. When resolution of delinquent loans through secondary repayment sources becomes
evident, updated appraisals are ordered and the Company generally begins to complete the tasks
necessary to gain control of the collateral and prepare for liquidation including, but not limited
to, engagement of counsel, inspection of collateral, and continued communication with the borrower,
if appropriate. Special Assets staff also regularly reviews the relationship to identify any
potential adverse developments during this time and continues to seek alternative resolution
processes, where possible.
At June 30, 2011, the allowance for loan losses related to loan restructurings totaled $1.32
million. Total interest income recognized on loan restructurings for the three- and six- month
periods ended June 30, 2011, totaled $132 thousand and $254 thousand, respectively. When
restructuring loans for troubled borrowers, the Company generally makes concessions in interest
rates and amortization terms.
- 44 -
Table of Contents
Deposits and Other Borrowings
Total deposits decreased by $41.28 million, or 2.55%, during the first six months of 2011.
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $14.34 million to $219.49 million at June 30, 2011,
compared with $205.15 million at December 31, 2010. Interest-bearing demand deposits increased
$9.20 million to $271.62 million at June 30, 2011, from December 31, 2010. Savings decreased $21.14
million, or 4.96%, and time deposits decreased $43.68 million, or 6.01%, during the first half of
2011.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements decreased $3.12 million, or 2.21%, in the first six
months of 2011 to $137.78 million. There were no federal funds purchased outstanding at June 30,
2011, as the Company maintained a very strong liquidity position throughout the first half of 2011.
Stockholders Equity
Total stockholders equity increased $32.33 million, or 11.98%, from $269.88 million at December
31, 2010, to $302.20 million at June 30, 2011. Changes in
stockholders equity during the period were primarily the result of net
income of $11.48 million, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $4.99 million,
the completion of an $18.92 million capital raise through the private placement of convertible
preferred stock, and the payment of common dividends of $3.58 million.
The convertible preferred stock was issued for general corporate
purposes, including the possible capitalization of the Companys
future growth plans.
Risk-Based Capital
Risk-based capital guidelines promulgated by federal banking agencies weight balance sheet assets
and off-balance sheet commitments based on inherent risks associated with the respective asset
types. At June 30, 2011, the Companys total risk-based capital ratio was 17.59% compared with
15.33% at December 31, 2010. The Companys Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 16.33% at June 30,
2011, compared with 14.07% at December 31, 2010. The Companys Tier 1 leverage ratio at June 30,
2011, was 11.00% compared with 9.44% at December 31, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, the Bank was deemed well-capitalized
under regulatory capital adequancy standards.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2011, the Company maintained liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalent balances
of $194.85 million, unpledged securities available-for-sale of $103.12 million, and total FHLB
credit availability of approximately $160.71 million. Cash and cash equivalents as well as advances
from the FHLB are immediately available for satisfaction of deposit withdrawals, customer credit
needs and operations of the Company. Investment securities available-for-sale represent a secondary
level of liquidity available for conversion to liquid funds in the event of extraordinary needs.
The Company also maintains approved lines of credit with correspondent banks as backup liquidity
sources.
The Company is a holding company, which is a separate legal entity from the Bank, and at June 30,
2011, maintained cash balances of $23.36 million.
The principal source of the Companys income is dividends from
the Bank, which are subject to regulatory restrictions and
limitations. As a result of investment securities impairments
in 2009, the Bank is limited as to the dividends it can pay to the
Company. Accordingly, the Bank would need
permission from the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions prior to paying dividends to the Company. The cash reserves and investments
held by the Company, as well as management fee arrangements provide adequate working capital
to meet its obligations and projected dividends to shareholders for the next twelve months and
through the projected period of dividend restrictions.
The Company maintains a liquidity policy as a means to manage liquidity and the associated risk.
The policy includes a Liquidity Contingency Plan (the Liquidity Plan) that is designed as a tool
for the Company to detect liquidity issues promptly in order to protect depositors, creditors and
shareholders. The Liquidity Plan includes monitoring various internal and external indicators such
as changes in core deposits and changes in market conditions. It provides for timely responses to a
wide variety of funding scenarios ranging from changes in loan demand to a decline in the Companys
quarterly earnings to a decline in the market price of the Companys stock. The Liquidity Plan
calls for specific responses designed to meet a wide range of liquidity needs based upon
assessments on a recurring basis by the Company and its Board of Directors.
- 45 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk and Asset/Liability Management
The Companys profitability is dependent to a large extent upon its net interest income, which is
the difference between its interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and
securities, and its interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the
degree that interest-earning assets reprice differently than interest-bearing liabilities. The
Company manages its mix of assets and liabilities with the goals of limiting its exposure to
interest rate risk, ensuring adequate liquidity, and coordinating its sources and uses of funds
while maintaining an acceptable level of net interest income given the current interest rate
environment.
The Companys primary component of operational revenue, net interest income, is subject to
variation as a result of changes in interest rate environments in conjunction with unbalanced
repricing opportunities on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate risk has
four primary components: repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and option risk. Repricing
risk occurs when earning assets and paying liabilities reprice at differing times as interest rates
change. Basis risk occurs when the underlying rates on the assets and liabilities the institution
holds change at different levels or in varying degrees. Yield curve risk is the risk of adverse
consequences as a result of unequal changes in the spread between two or more rates for different
maturities for the same instrument. Lastly, option risk is due to embedded options, often put or
call options, given or sold to holders of financial instruments.
In order to mitigate the effect of changes in the general level of interest rates, the Company
manages repricing opportunities and thus, its interest rate sensitivity. The Company seeks to
control its interest rate risk exposure to insulate net interest income and net earnings from
fluctuations in the general level of interest rates. To measure its exposure to interest rate risk,
quarterly simulations of net interest income are performed using financial models that project net
interest income through a range of possible interest rate environments including rising, declining,
most likely and flat rate scenarios. The simulation model used by the Company captures all earning
assets, interest-bearing liabilities and off-balance sheet financial instruments and combines the
various factors affecting rate sensitivity into an earnings outlook and estimates of the economic
value of equity in a range for a range of assumed interest rate scenarios. The results of these
simulations indicate the existence and severity of interest rate risk in each of those rate
environments based upon the current balance sheet position, assumptions as to changes in the volume
and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-paying liabilities and the Companys estimate of
yields to be attained in those future rate environments and rates that will be paid on various
deposit instruments and borrowings. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result,
the model cannot precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest
income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency
of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and the Companys strategies.
However, the earnings simulation model is currently the best tool available to the Company and the
industry for managing interest rate risk.
Specific strategies for management of interest rate risk have included shortening the amortized
maturity of new fixed-rate loans, increasing the volume of adjustable-rate loans to reduce the
average maturity of the Companys interest-earning assets, and monitoring the term and structure of
liabilities to maintain a balanced mix of maturity and repricing structures to mitigate potential
exposure. At June 30, 2011, modeling indicates that the Company is in a relatively neutral position
with respect to sensitivity to interest rate changes.
The Company has established policy limits for tolerance of interest rate risk in various interest
rate scenarios. In addition, the policy addresses exposure limits to changes in the economic value
of equity according to predefined policy guidelines. The most recent simulation indicates that
current exposure to interest rate risk is within the Companys defined policy limits.
- 46 -
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the projected impact on the next twelve months net interest income
and the economic value of equity as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, of immediate and
sustained rate shocks in the interest rate environments of plus 300 to minus 100 basis points from
the base case rate simulation, assuming no remedial measures are effected. At June 30, 2011, the
Federal Open Market Committee maintained a target range for federal funds of 0 to 25 basis points,
rendering complete downward shocks greater than 100 basis points unrealistic and not meaningful. In
the downward rate shocks presented, benchmark interest rates are dropped with floors near 0%.
Rate Sensitivity Analysis | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Change in | Change in | ||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in | Net Interest | Percent | Economic Value | Percent | ||||||||||||
Interest Rates (Basis Points) | Income | Change | of Equity | Change | ||||||||||||
300
|
$ | 5,645 | 8.3 | $ | 13,009 | 3.9 | ||||||||||
200
|
3,452 | 5.1 | 11,293 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||
100
|
1,599 | 2.4 | 7,950 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
(100)
|
(318 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (26,750 | ) | (8.0 | ) |
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | Change in | Change in | ||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in | Net Interest | Percent | Economic Value | Percent | ||||||||||||
Interest Rates (Basis Points) | Income | Change | of Equity | Change | ||||||||||||
300 |
$ | 932 | 1.2 | $ | (10,634 | ) | (3.6 | ) | ||||||||
200 |
121 | 0.2 | (1,530 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||||
100 |
329 | 0.4 | 4,734 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
(100) |
(105 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (21,503 | ) | (7.3 | ) |
The economic value of equity is a measure which reflects the impact of changing rates on the
underlying values of the Companys assets and liabilities in various rate scenarios. The scenarios
illustrate the potential estimated impact of instantaneous rate shocks on the underlying value of
equity. The economic value of equity is based on the present value of all the future cash flows
under the different rate scenarios.
- 47 -
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 13a-15(b). Based on that evaluation, the Companys CEO
along with the Companys CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of June 30, 2011, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its
consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC filings.
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys disclosure
controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can
occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company assesses the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting quarterly and
enhances its controls in response to internal control assessments and internal and external audit
and regulatory recommendations. There were no changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is currently a defendant in various legal actions and asserted claims in the normal
course of business. Although the Company and legal counsel are unable to assess the ultimate
outcome of each of these matters with certainty, they are of the belief that the resolution of
these actions should not have a material adverse affect on the financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows of the Company.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) | Not Applicable |
(b) | Not Applicable |
(c) | Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
- 48 -
Table of Contents
The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the
Company or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) of the Companys Common Stock during the second quarter of 2011.
Total Number | Maximum | |||||||||||||||
Total | of Shares | Number of | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Purchased as | Shares That May | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Part of a Publicly | Yet be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Purchased | per Share | Announced Plan | Under the Plan (1) | |||||||||||||
April 1-30, 2011 |
| $ | | | 912,777 | |||||||||||
May 1-31, 2011 |
| | | 913,027 | ||||||||||||
June 1-30, 2011 |
| | | 935,002 | ||||||||||||
Total |
| $ | | | ||||||||||||
(1) | The Companys stock repurchase plan, as amended, allows the purchase and retention of up to 1,100,000 shares. The plan has no expiration date, remains open and no plans have expired during the reporting period covered by this table. No determination has been made to terminate the plan or to cease making purchases. The Company held 164,998 shares in treasury at June 30, 2011. |
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. Reserved
ITEM 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. Exhibits
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit | ||
No. | Exhibit | |
3(i)
|
Articles of Incorporation of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (31) | |
3(ii)
|
Bylaws of First Community Bancshares, Inc., as amended. (17) | |
3.1
|
Reserved. | |
4.1
|
Specimen stock certificate of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (3) | |
4.2
|
Indenture Agreement dated September 25, 2003. (11) | |
4.3
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of FCBI Capital Trust dated September 25, 2003. (11) | |
4.4
|
Preferred Securities Guarantee Agreement dated September 25, 2003. (11) | |
4.5
|
Certificate of Designation of 6.00% Series A Noncumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. (21) | |
4.6
|
Warrant to purchase 88,273 shares of Common Stock of First Community Bancshares, Inc. (29) | |
4.7
|
Reserved. | |
4.8
|
Reserved. | |
10.1**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Contracts (2) and Plan. (4) | |
10.1.1**
|
Amendment to First Community Bancshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (18) | |
10.2**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Non-Qualified Directors Stock Option Plan. (5) | |
10.3**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and John M. Mendez (6) and Waiver Agreement. (27) | |
10.4**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2000 Executive Retention Plan, as amended (24) and Amendment #1. (28) | |
10.5**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. Split Dollar Plan and Agreement. (8) | |
10.6**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Directors Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended. (22) | |
10.7**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. Wrap Plan. (7) | |
10.8
|
Reserved. | |
10.9**
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between First Community Bancshares, Inc., its Directors and Certain Executive Officers. (9) | |
10.10**
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between First Community Bank, N. A, its Directors and Certain Executive Officers. (9) | |
10.11
|
Reserved. | |
10.12**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Stock Option Plan (10) and Form of Award Agreement. (13) | |
10.13
|
Reserved. |
- 49 -
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
No. | Exhibit | |
10.14**
|
First Community Bancshares, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. (7) | |
10.15
|
Reserved. | |
10.16**
|
Employment Agreement dated November 30, 2006, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Ronald L. Campbell. (19) | |
10.17
|
Reserved. | |
10.18
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the United States Department of the Treasury and First Community Bancshares, Inc. dated November 21, 2008. (22) | |
10.19**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and David D. Brown. (23) | |
10.20**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and Robert L. Buzzo. (26) | |
10.21**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bancshares, Inc. and E. Stephen Lilly. (26) | |
10.22**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Gary R. Mills. (26) | |
10.23**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Martyn A. Pell. (26) | |
10.24**
|
Employment Agreement dated December 16, 2008, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Robert. L. Schumacher. (26) | |
10.25**
|
Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2009, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Simpson O. Brown. (25) | |
10.26**
|
Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2009, between First Community Bank, N. A. and Mark R. Evans. (25) | |
11
|
Statement regarding computation of earnings per share. (16) | |
31.1*
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | |
31.2*
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | |
32*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Furnished herewith. | |
** | Indicates a management contract or compensation plan. | |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 16, 2010 | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 14, 2002. | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, filed on March 25, 2003, as amended on March 31, 2003. | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, filed on March 30, 2000, as amended April 13, 2000. | |
(5) | The option agreements entered into pursuant to the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Non-Qualified Directors Stock Option Plan are incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, filed on August 14, 2002. | |
(6) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed December 16, 2008. The Registrant has entered into substantially identical agreements with Robert L. Buzzo and E. Stephen Lilly, with the only differences being with respect to title and salary. |
- 50 -
Table of Contents
(7) | Incorporated by reference from Item 1.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2006, and filed August 23, 2006. | |
(8) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 1999, and filed on April 4, 2000, and amended on April 13, 2000. | |
(9) | Form of indemnification agreement entered into by the Company and by First Community Bank, N. A. with their respective directors and certain officers of each including, for the Registrant and Bank: John M. Mendez, Robert L. Schumacher, Robert L. Buzzo, E. Stephen Lilly, David D. Brown, and Gary R. Mills. Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 15, 2004, and amended on May 19, 2004. | |
(10) | Incorporated by reference from the 2004 First Community Bancshares, Inc. Definitive Proxy filed on March 15, 2004. | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, filed on November 10, 2003. | |
(12) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, filed on May 7, 2004. | |
(13) | Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed on August 6, 2004. | |
(14) | Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, and filed on March 16, 2005. Amendments in substantially similar form were executed for Directors Clark, Kantor, Hamner, Modena, Perkinson, Stafford, and Stafford II. | |
(15) | Incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 24, 2006, and filed October 25, 2006. | |
(16) | Incorporated by reference from Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein. | |
(17) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2008, filed on February 20, 2008. | |
(18) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, filed on May 7, 2004. | |
(19) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Form S-3 registration statement filed May 2, 2007. | |
(20) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 28, 2011, and filed June 28, 2011. | |
(21) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 2011, and filed May 23, 2011. | |
(22) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2010, and filed December 17, 2010. | |
(23) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed December 16, 2008. | |
(24) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2008, and filed January 5, 2009. | |
(25) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2009 and filed April 3, 2009. | |
(26) | Incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed July 6, 2009. | |
(27) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2010, and filed December 17, 2010. | |
(28) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2010, and filed December 17, 2010. (29) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.3 of the Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed July 27, 2010. | |
(30) | Reserved. | |
(31) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period dated June 30, 2010, and filed August 16, 2010. |
- 51 -
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
First Community Bancshares, Inc.
DATE:
August 9, 2011
/s/ John M. Mendez | ||||
John M. Mendez | ||||
President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
/s/ David D. Brown | ||||
David D. Brown | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
- 52 -
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Exhibit | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. | |
32
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
- 53 -