FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Commission file number 0-7674
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 75-0944023 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
400 Pine Street, Abilene, Texas 79601
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(325) 627-7155
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of November 3, 2009:
Class | Number of Shares Outstanding | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | 20,822,766 | |
per share |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
The consolidated balance sheets of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) at September
30, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive
earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, follow
on pages 4 through 8.
3
Table of Contents
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS |
$ | 89,325,775 | $ | 113,067,036 | $ | 137,569,957 | ||||||
FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD |
38,045,000 | 55,675,000 | 27,660,000 | |||||||||
INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS IN BANKS |
23,883,810 | 3,922,022 | 3,658,037 | |||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
151,254,585 | 172,664,058 | 168,887,994 | |||||||||
TRADING SECURITIES, at fair value |
4,779,483 | 95,737,085 | 55,990,882 | |||||||||
SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY (fair value of $15,824,051,
$24,271,778 and $24,072,925 at September 30, 2009 and 2008
and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
15,324,095 | 23,575,687 | 23,493,088 | |||||||||
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE, at fair value |
1,303,347,263 | 1,134,632,127 | 1,238,921,868 | |||||||||
LOANS |
||||||||||||
Held for investment |
1,449,342,974 | 1,522,416,156 | 1,511,420,878 | |||||||||
Held for sale |
5,054,300 | 45,310,536 | 54,721,837 | |||||||||
1,454,397,274 | 1,567,726,692 | 1,566,142,715 | ||||||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
(25,531,939 | ) | (20,048,219 | ) | (21,528,860 | ) | ||||||
Net loans |
1,428,865,335 | 1,547,678,473 | 1,544,613,855 | |||||||||
BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, net |
63,658,827 | 65,531,388 | 65,675,138 | |||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
63,351,265 | 64,290,370 | 64,002,968 | |||||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
45,611,727 | 44,478,758 | 50,798,861 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,076,192,580 | $ | 3,148,587,946 | $ | 3,212,384,654 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
NONINTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS |
$ | 719,265,726 | $ | 769,114,908 | $ | 797,077,004 | ||||||
INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS |
1,739,636,862 | 1,794,437,339 | 1,785,676,148 | |||||||||
Total deposits |
2,458,902,588 | 2,563,552,247 | 2,582,753,152 | |||||||||
DIVIDENDS PAYABLE |
7,079,547 | 7,069,840 | 7,071,342 | |||||||||
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS |
160,401,097 | 196,838,548 | 235,598,268 | |||||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
34,275,422 | 30,710,467 | 18,179,664 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,660,658,654 | 2,798,171,102 | 2,843,602,426 | |||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Common stock $0.01 par value, authorized 40,000,000 shares;
20,822,396, 20,793,647, and 20,799,198 shares issued
at September 30, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
208,224 | 207,936 | 207,992 | |||||||||
Capital surplus |
269,073,389 | 267,927,363 | 268,087,449 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
109,662,745 | 83,669,522 | 89,637,172 | |||||||||
Treasury
stock (shares at cost: 161,546, 158,846, and 158,811 at September 30, 2009 and 2008, and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
(3,745,991 | ) | (3,410,582 | ) | (3,500,436 | ) | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
3,745,991 | 3,410,582 | 3,500,436 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) |
36,589,568 | (1,387,977 | ) | 10,849,615 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
415,533,926 | 350,416,844 | 368,782,228 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 3,076,192,580 | $ | 3,148,587,946 | $ | 3,212,384,654 | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 22,640,933 | $ | 25,772,830 | $ | 68,384,432 | $ | 79,814,100 | ||||||||
Interest on investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
9,144,454 | 9,269,433 | 27,950,876 | 27,657,940 | ||||||||||||
Exempt from federal income
tax |
4,705,110 | 3,488,941 | 13,331,972 | 10,275,868 | ||||||||||||
Interest on trading securities |
10,682 | 352,487 | 150,994 | 457,246 | ||||||||||||
Interest on
federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks |
96,149 | 334,057 | 209,313 | 1,709,881 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
36,597,328 | 39,217,748 | 110,027,587 | 119,915,035 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
3,835,903 | 7,312,185 | 12,767,579 | 26,891,154 | ||||||||||||
Other |
179,104 | 506,335 | 633,496 | 1,774,802 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
4,015,007 | 7,818,520 | 13,401,075 | 28,665,956 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
32,582,321 | 31,399,228 | 96,626,512 | 91,249,079 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
3,705,500 | 1,764,547 | 7,054,006 | 4,273,798 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
28,876,821 | 29,634,681 | 89,572,506 | 86,975,281 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Trust fees |
2,328,205 | 2,501,240 | 6,570,494 | 7,229,598 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
5,732,386 | 5,808,933 | 16,294,274 | 17,005,316 | ||||||||||||
ATM and credit card fees |
2,426,824 | 2,328,072 | 7,062,358 | 6,623,132 | ||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage operations |
731,438 | 648,682 | 2,177,382 | 2,017,915 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on securities transactions |
897,459 | 146,269 | 1,644,811 | 705,326 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of student loans |
272,926 | 2,665 | 889,403 | 1,717,260 | ||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sale of foreclosed assets |
(127,626 | ) | 26,680 | (186,888 | ) | 115,905 | ||||||||||
Other |
617,682 | 828,093 | 2,084,419 | 2,643,717 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
12,879,294 | 12,290,634 | 36,536,253 | 38,058,169 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
12,201,071 | 12,451,597 | 36,434,486 | 37,544,690 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
1,598,836 | 1,826,387 | 4,785,358 | 5,069,110 | ||||||||||||
Equipment expense |
1,919,886 | 1,890,550 | 5,827,688 | 5,602,657 | ||||||||||||
Printing, stationery and supplies |
507,978 | 482,208 | 1,405,491 | 1,432,994 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance premiums |
817,548 | 162,106 | 4,073,836 | 438,273 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
213,672 | 302,038 | 651,703 | 916,799 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
5,759,375 | 6,269,816 | 17,146,205 | 18,050,659 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
23,018,366 | 23,384,702 | 70,324,767 | 69,055,182 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
18,737,749 | 18,540,613 | 55,783,992 | 55,978,268 | ||||||||||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
4,751,641 | 5,179,134 | 14,528,318 | 15,852,974 | ||||||||||||
NET EARNINGS |
$ | 13,986,108 | $ | 13,361,479 | $ | 41,255,674 | $ | 40,125,294 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE, BASIC |
$ | 0.67 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 1.98 | $ | 1.93 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE, ASSUMING DILUTION |
$ | 0.67 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 1.98 | $ | 1.93 | ||||||||
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
NET EARNINGS |
$ | 13,986,108 | $ | 13,361,479 | $ | 41,255,674 | $ | 40,125,294 | ||||||||
OTHER ITEMS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (LOSS): |
||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain
(loss) on
investment
securities
available-for-sale,
before
income taxes |
30,594,499 | 221,754 | 41,244,739 | (7,303,153 | ) | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for
realized
gains on investment
securities
included in net
earnings, before
income tax |
(897,459 | ) | (146,269 | ) | (1,644,811 | ) | (705,326 | ) | ||||||||
Total other items
of comprehensive
earnings (loss) |
29,697,040 | 75,485 | 39,599,928 | (8,008,479 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense)
related to other items of
comprehensive
earnings (loss) |
(10,393,964 | ) | (26,420 | ) | (13,859,975 | ) | 2,802,968 | |||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS |
$ | 33,289,184 | $ | 13,410,544 | $ | 66,995,627 | $ | 34,919,783 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Capital | Retained | Treasury Stock | Deferred | Comprehensive | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Surplus | Earnings | Shares | Amounts | Compensation | Earnings | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 |
20,766,848 | $ | 207,669 | $ | 267,136,338 | $ | 64,333,921 | (155,415 | ) | $ | (3,170,304 | ) | $ | 3,170,304 | $ | 3,817,534 | $ | 335,495,462 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (unaudited) |
| | | 40,125,294 | | | | | 40,125,294 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuances (unaudited) |
26,799 | 267 | 519,913 | | | | | 520,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared,
$1.00 per share (unaudited) |
| | | (20,789,693 | ) | | | | | (20,789,693 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) in
investment securities available-for-sale,
net of related income taxes (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | (5,205,511 | ) | (5,205,511 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional tax benefit related to directors
deferred compensation plan (unaudited) |
| | 101,801 | | | | | | 101,801 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares purchased in connection with directors
deferred compensation plan, net (unaudited) |
| | | | (3,431 | ) | (240,278 | ) | 240,278 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense (unaudited) |
| | 169,311 | | | | | | 169,311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at September 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
20,793,647 | $ | 207,936 | $ | 267,927,363 | $ | 83,669,522 | (158,846 | ) | $ | (3,410,582 | ) | $ | 3,410,582 | $ | (1,387,977 | ) | $ | 350,416,844 | |||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2008 |
20,799,198 | $ | 207,992 | $ | 268,087,449 | $ | 89,637,172 | (158,811 | ) | $ | (3,500,436 | ) | $ | 3,500,436 | $ | 10,849,615 | $ | 368,782,228 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (unaudited) |
| | | 41,255,674 | | | | | 41,255,674 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuances (unaudited) |
23,198 | 232 | 582,488 | | | | | | 582,720 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared,
$1.02 per share (unaudited) |
| | | (21,230,101 | ) | | | | | (21,230,101 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain in
investment securities available-
for-sale, net of related income taxes
(unaudited) |
| | | | | | | 25,739,953 | 25,739,953 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional tax benefit related to directors
deferred compensation plan (unaudited) |
| | 195,810 | | | | | | 195,810 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares purchased in connection with
directors deferred compensation plan,
net (unaudited) |
| | | | (2,735 | ) | (245,555 | ) | 245,555 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense (unaudited) |
| | 207,642 | | | | | | 207,642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at September 30, 2009 (unaudited) |
20,822,396 | $ | 208,224 | $ | 269,073,389 | $ | 109,662,745 | (161,546 | ) | $ | (3,745,991 | ) | $ | 3,745,991 | $ | 36,589,568 | $ | 415,533,926 | ||||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 41,255,674 | $ | 40,125,294 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,842,415 | 5,985,192 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
7,054,006 | 4,273,798 | ||||||
Securities premium amortization (discount accretion), net |
923,118 | 418,416 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets, net |
(2,391,394 | ) | (2,695,408 | ) | ||||
Deferred federal income tax expense (benefit) |
(103,563 | ) | 59,712 | |||||
Trading securites activity, net |
51,211,399 | (95,737,085 | ) | |||||
Loans originated for resale |
(146,499,682 | ) | (154,828,708 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for resale |
196,978,623 | 146,809,643 | ||||||
Change in other assets |
5,974,036 | 4,025,859 | ||||||
Change in other liabilities |
3,521,693 | 3,924,276 | ||||||
Total adjustments |
122,510,651 | (87,764,305 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
163,766,325 | (47,639,011 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Activity in available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||
Sales |
44,903,836 | 73,150,665 | ||||||
Maturities |
144,712,362 | 179,294,394 | ||||||
Purchases |
(214,506,507 | ) | (286,336,808 | ) | ||||
Activity in held-to-maturity securities maturities |
8,175,238 | 2,840,503 | ||||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans |
55,269,324 | (34,181,586 | ) | |||||
Purchases of bank premises and equipment and computer software |
(2,504,269 | ) | (9,523,116 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of other assets |
2,237,193 | 1,974,552 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
38,287,177 | (72,781,396 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits |
(77,811,278 | ) | 29,933,928 | |||||
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits |
(46,039,286 | ) | (12,464,699 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
(75,197,171 | ) | 30,572,122 | |||||
Common stock transactions: |
||||||||
Proceeds from stock issuances |
582,720 | 520,180 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(21,221,896 | ) | (20,365,442 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(219,686,911 | ) | 28,196,089 | |||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(17,633,409 | ) | (92,224,318 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
168,887,994 | 264,888,376 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ | 151,254,585 | 172,664,058 | |||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AND NONCASH TRANSACTIONS |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 14,190,190 | 26,615,657 | |||||
Federal income tax paid |
14,146,819 | 15,507,566 | ||||||
Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets |
3,835,652 | 2,523,712 | ||||||
Investment securities purchased but not settled |
| 18,151,271 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, a Texas corporation and
a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, or BHCA, and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries: First Financial Bankshares of Delaware, Inc.; First Financial
Investments of Delaware, Inc.; First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas; First
Financial Bank, Hereford, Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Sweetwater, Texas;
First Financial Bank, National Association, Eastland, Texas; First Financial Bank, National
Association, Cleburne, Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Stephenville, Texas;
First Financial Bank, National Association, San Angelo, Texas; First Financial Bank, National
Association, Weatherford, Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Southlake, Texas;
First Financial Bank, National Association, Mineral Wells, Texas; First Technology Services, Inc.;
First Financial Trust & Asset Management Company, National Association; First Financial
Investments, Inc.; and First Financial Insurance Agency, Inc.
Through our subsidiary banks, we conduct a full-service commercial banking business. Our service
centers are located primarily in North Central and West Texas. Considering the branches and
locations of all our bank subsidiaries, as of September 30, 2009, we had 48 financial centers
across Texas, with ten locations in Abilene, two locations in Cleburne, three locations in
Stephenville, three locations in Granbury, two locations in San Angelo, three locations in
Weatherford, and one location each in Mineral Wells, Hereford, Sweetwater, Eastland, Ranger, Rising
Star, Southlake, Aledo, Willow Park, Brock, Alvarado, Burleson, Keller, Trophy Club, Boyd,
Bridgeport, Decatur, Roby, Trent, Merkel, Clyde, Moran, Albany, Midlothian and Glen Rose. Our
trust subsidiary has six locations in Abilene, San Angelo, Stephenville, Sweetwater, Fort Worth and
Odessa, all in Texas.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position and unaudited
results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial
statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2008. All adjustments were of a
normal recurring nature. However, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2009, due to seasonality, changes in economic conditions and loan credit
quality, interest rate fluctuations, regulatory and legislative changes and other factors. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) have
been condensed or omitted under SEC rules and regulations. The Company evaluated subsequent events
for potential recognition and/or disclosure through November 3, 2009, the date the consolidated
financial statements were issued.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated annually for impairment as of the end of the
second quarter. No such impairment was noted in connection with that evaluation.
Note 2 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders
by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. In computing diluted
earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the
Company assumes that all dilutive outstanding options to purchase common stock have been exercised
at the beginning of the period (or the time of issuance, if later). The dilutive effect of the
outstanding options is reflected by application of the treasury stock method, whereby the proceeds
from the exercised options are assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market
price during the respective periods. The weighted average common shares outstanding used in
computing basic earnings per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, were 20,819,398 and 20,793,197,
9
Table of Contents
respectively. The weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per
share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 20,810,112 and 20,784,711,
respectively. The weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing fully diluted
earnings per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, were 20,844,567
and 20,853,539, respectively. The weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing
fully diluted earnings per common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, were
20,830,932 and 20,831,128, respectively.
Note 3 Securities
A summary of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities is as follows:
September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 14,651 | $ | 491 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 15,139 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
673 | 13 | (1 | ) | 685 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 15,324 | $ | 504 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 15,824 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies
|
$ | 268,628 | $ | 12,321 | $ | | $ | 280,949 | ||||||||
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions |
440,062 | 28,034 | (129 | ) | 467,967 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
71,509 | 4,803 | | 76,312 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
452,298 | 20,109 | (101 | ) | 472,306 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,550 | 263 | | 5,813 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,238,047 | $ | 65,530 | $ | (230 | ) | $ | 1,303,347 | |||||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 22,573 | $ | 694 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 23,260 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,003 | 13 | (4 | ) | 1,012 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 23,576 | $ | 707 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 24,272 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
301,626 | 4,249 | (521 | ) | 305,354 | |||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
347,158 | 3,404 | (5,083 | ) | 345,479 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
43,117 | 188 | (1,994 | ) | 41,311 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
434,759 | 4,062 | (1,986 | ) | 436,835 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,550 | 103 | | 5,653 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,132,210 | $ | 12,006 | $ | (9,584 | ) | $ | 1,134,632 | |||||||
10
Table of Contents
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2009, by
contractual and expected maturity, are shown below (in thousands):
Held-to-Maturity | Available-for-Sale | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Estimated | Amortized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Fair Value | Cost Basis | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 7,644 | $ | 7,776 | $ | 105,656 | $ | 107,818 | ||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
6,777 | 7,133 | 398,622 | 419,713 | ||||||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
100 | 100 | 265,446 | 286,028 | ||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
130 | 130 | 16,025 | 17,482 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
673 | 685 | 452,298 | 472,306 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15,324 | $ | 15,824 | $ | 1,238,047 | $ | 1,303,347 | ||||||||
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that were
classified as available-for-sale totaled $9.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively. Gross
realized gains from 2009 and 2008 securities sales totaled $897 thousand and $146 thousand,
respectively. There were no losses on securities sales during these periods. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that were classified as
available-for-sale totaled $44.9 million and $73.2 million, respectively. Gross realized gains
from 2009 and 2008 securities sales were $1.6 million and $705 thousand, respectively. There were
no losses on securities sales during these periods. The specific identification method was used to
determine cost on computing the realized gains.
The following tables disclose, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, our available-for-sale and
held-to- maturity securities that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for less than
12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for 12 or more months
(in thousands):
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 2,753 | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 2,161 | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 4,914 | $ | (132 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
16,267 | (101 | ) | 87 | (1 | ) | 16,354 | (102 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,020 | $ | (166 | ) | $ | 2,248 | $ | (68 | ) | $ | 21,268 | $ | (234 | ) | |||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 81,685 | $ | (521 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 81,685 | $ | (521 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
163,246 | (5,070 | ) | 912 | (20 | ) | 164,158 | (5,090 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
109,240 | (994 | ) | 38,401 | (996 | ) | 147,641 | (1,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
24,223 | (1,994 | ) | | | 24,223 | (1,994 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 378,394 | $ | (8,579 | ) | $ | 39,313 | $ | (1,016 | ) | $ | 417,707 | $ | (9,595 | ) | |||||||||
11
Table of Contents
The number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totaled 31 at September
30, 2009. We do not believe these unrealized losses are other than temporary as (1) we do not
have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and (2) it is more likely than not that we
will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery. The unrealized losses noted are interest
rate related due to the level of interest rates at September 30, 2009. We have reviewed the
ratings of the issuers and have not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of
principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities. Our mortgage related securities are
backed by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC or are collateralized by securities backed by these agencies.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, trading securities totaled $4.8 million and $95.7 million,
respectively. The trading securities portfolio is a government securities money market fund
comprised primarily of U.S. government agency securities and repurchase agreements collateralized
by U.S. government agency securities. The trading securities are carried at estimated fair value
with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. The Company began investing in trading
securities in 2008 to improve its yield on daily funds and to lower its exposure on Federal funds.
However, due to significantly lower interest rates, the Company has deployed these funds in other
assets.
Note 4 Loans And Allowance for Loan Losses
Major classifications of loans are as follows (dollars in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
$ | 463,723 | $ | 492,681 | $ | 485,707 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
98,736 | 164,890 | 158,000 | |||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
709,866 | 670,553 | 678,788 | |||||||||
Consumer |
182,072 | 239,603 | 243,648 | |||||||||
Total Loans |
$ | 1,454,397 | $ | 1,567,727 | $ | 1,566,143 | ||||||
Included in real estate-mortgage and consumer loans above are $3.5 million and $1.5 million,
respectively, in loans held for sale at September 30, 2009, $3.1 million and $42.2 million,
respectively, at September 30, 2008 and $2.9 million and $51.8 million, respectively, in loans held
for sale at December 31, 2008, in which the carrying amounts approximate fair value.
The Companys recorded investment in impaired loans and the related valuation allowance are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Valuation | Recorded | Valuation | Recorded | Valuation | |||||||||||||||||
Investment | Allowance | Investment | Allowance | Investment | Allowance | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 14,585 | $ | 2,907 | $ | 7,947 | $ | 1,250 | $ | 9,893 | $ | 2,040 | |||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
The allowance for loan losses as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, is presented
below. The level of the allowance reflects our periodic evaluation of general economic conditions,
the financial condition of our borrowers, the value and liquidity of collateral, delinquencies,
prior loan loss experience, and the results of periodic reviews of the portfolio by our independent
loan review department and regulatory examiners. Management has evaluated the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses by estimating the probable losses in various categories of the loan
portfolio, which are identified below:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses provided for: |
||||||||||||
Loans specifically evaluated as impaired |
$ | 2,906,686 | $ | 1,250,416 | $ | 2,040,323 | ||||||
Remaining portfolio |
22,625,253 | 18,797,803 | 19,488,537 | |||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 25,531,939 | $ | 20,048,219 | $ | 21,528,860 | ||||||
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 23,246,778 | $ | 18,676,915 | $ | 21,528,860 | $ | 17,461,514 | ||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,705,500 | 1,764,547 | 7,054,006 | 4,273,798 | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
241,829 | 253,061 | 729,110 | 621,407 | ||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(1,662,168 | ) | (646,304 | ) | (3,780,037 | ) | (2,308,500 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 25,531,939 | $ | 20,048,219 | $ | 25,531,939 | $ | 20,048,219 | ||||||||
Nonaccrual, loans still accruing and past due 90 days or more, restructured loans and
foreclosed assets are as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 14,585 | $ | 7,947 | $ | 9,893 | ||||||
Loans still accruing and past due 90 days or more |
56 | 212 | 36 | |||||||||
Restructured loans |
| | | |||||||||
Foreclosed assets |
4,367 | 2,613 | 2,602 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,008 | $ | 10,772 | $ | 12,531 | ||||||
As a % of total loans and foreclosed assets |
1.30 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||||
As a % of total assets |
0.62 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.39 | % |
Note 5 Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $4.8 million for the third quarter in 2009 as compared to $5.2 million for
the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates on pretax income were 25.36% and 27.93% for the
third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rates differ from the statutory
federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income earned on certain investment
securities and loans, the deductibility of dividends paid to our employee stock ownership plan and
Texas state taxes.
13
Table of Contents
Income tax expense was $14.5 million for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $15.9 million
for the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates on pretax income were 26.04% and 28.32%,
respectively, for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The effective tax
rates differ from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income
earned on certain investment securities and loans, the deductibility of dividends paid to our
employee stock ownership plan and Texas state taxes.
The decreases in the effective tax rates for the third quarter and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 over the same periods in 2008 were largely the result of an increase in tax
exempt income.
Note 6 Stock Based Compensation
The Company grants incentive stock options for a fixed number of shares with an exercise price
equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant to employees. In May 2009, the Company
granted incentive stock options to purchase 101,600 shares of Company common stock with an exercise
price of $50.33 per share. The fair value of the options granted was estimated using the
Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free
interest rate of 3.24%; expected dividend yield of 2.66%; expected life of 5.79 years; and expected
volatility of 41.64%.
The Company recorded stock option expense totaling approximately $71 thousand and $56 thousand,
respectively, for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The Company recorded
stock option expense totaling $208 thousand and $169 thousand, respectively, for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The additional disclosure requirements under authoritative accounting guidance have been omitted
due to immateriality.
Note 7 Pension Plan
The Companys defined benefit pension plan was frozen effective January 1, 2004, whereby no
additional years of service will accrue to participants, unless the pension plan is reinstated at a
future date. The pension plan covered substantially all of the Companys employees. The benefits
for each employee were based on years of service and a percentage of the employees qualifying
compensation during the final years of employment. The Companys funding policy was and is to
contribute annually the amount necessary to satisfy the Internal Revenue Services funding
standards. Contributions to the pension plan, prior to freezing the plan, were intended to provide
not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the
future. As a result of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the Protection Act), the Company will
be required to contribute amounts in future years to fund any shortfalls. The Company evaluated
the provisions of the Protection Act as well as the Internal Revenue Services funding standards
to develop a preliminary plan for funding in future years. The Company made a
contribution totaling $1.4 million in April 2009 and $800 thousand in 2008 and continues to
evaluate future funding amounts.
Net periodic benefit costs totaling $80 thousand and $79 thousand were recorded, respectively, for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Net periodic benefit costs totaling $241
thousand and $236 thousand were recorded, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008.
14
Table of Contents
Note 8 Recently Issued Authoritative Accounting Guidance
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) established the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative U. S. generally accepted
accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretative releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative guidance for SEC registrants. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature
not included in the Codification became nonauthoritative. The Codification became effective for
the period ended September 30, 2009 and did not have a significant impact on the Companys
financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to an employers disclosure about
plan assets of defined benefit pension or other post-retirement benefit plans. Under this new
guidance, disclosures should provide users of financial statements with an understanding of how
investment allocation decisions are made, the factors that are pertinent to an understanding of
investment policies and strategies, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the effect of fair value measurements
using significant unobservable inputs on changes in plan assets for the period and significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. The new disclosures will be effective for the Companys
financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Effective January 1, 2009, with clarifying guidance in April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative
guidance that applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over
one or more other businesses. This guidance requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining
control of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any non-controlling interest in
the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition date. As a result, an acquired banks allowance
for loan losses will not be brought over to the Companys allowance for loan losses but rather be
recorded at fair value at date of acquisition. Contingent consideration is required to be
recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition if the acquisition fair value of
that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition date
fair value of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a
contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, an asset or a liability shall be
recognized at the acquisition date if both the information available for the end of the measurement
period indicates that it is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at
the acquisition date and the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. This
guidance replaces the cost-allocation process required under previous guidance whereby the cost
of an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair value. This guidance also requires acquirers to expense
acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, as was previously required. The new guidance is expected to have an impact on
the Companys accounting for business combinations closing after January 1, 2009.
In March 2009, the FASB issued additional authoritative accounting guidance to:
| Amend the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and improve the presentation and disclosure in the financial statement. The new guidance specifies that if a company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporary impaired unless there is a credit loss. The credit loss component of an other-than-temporary impaired debt security must be determined based on the entitys best estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. |
15
Table of Contents
| Provide additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset and liability have significantly decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The new guidance does not prescribe a methodology for making significant adjustments to transactions or quoted prices when estimating fair value in these situations but states that a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. | |
| Require companies to provide the same fair value of financial instruments disclosures presently required on an annual basis on a quarterly interim basis. |
This new guidance was effective for the period ended June 30, 2009 and did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows other than
additional disclosures.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which established general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or available to be issued. This guidance sets forth (i) the period
after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events
or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
(ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring
after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (iii) the disclosures that an entity
should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This new
guidance was effective for the period ended June 30, 2009 and did not have a significant impact on
the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to improve the information a reporting entity
provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, including the effect of
a transfer on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows and the
transferors continuing involvement in the transferred assets. The guidance eliminates the concept
of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the guidance for evaluation for consolidation.
This guidance is effective January 1, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to amend previous guidance to replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a
controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on
identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (i) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or (ii) the right to receive benefits from the entity. The guidance is
effective January 1, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 9 Fair Value Disclosures
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or
transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence
of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the
principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability
shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes
exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities
that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a
forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are
(i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.
16
Table of Contents
The authoritative guidance requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the
market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and
other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable
assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts,
such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost
approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of
an asset (replacement costs). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to
valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, the
authoritative guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the
highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
| Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. | ||
| Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. Level 2 investments consist primarily of obligations of U.S. government sponsored enterprises and agencies, obligations of state and municipal subdivisions, corporate bonds and mortgage backed securities. | ||
| Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entitys own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair
value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation
hierarchy, is set forth below.
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market
prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use,
as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that
financial instruments are recorded at fair value. While management believes the Companys
valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of
different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments
could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities classified as available for sale and trading are reported at fair value utilizing Level
1 and Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an
independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include
dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the United States Treasury (the Treasury) yield curve,
live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information
and the securitys terms and conditions, among other things.
17
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within
the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (dollars in thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Fair | |||||||||||||
Inputs | Inputs | Inputs | Value | |||||||||||||
Available for sale investment
securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U. S.
government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | | $ | 280,949 | $ | | $ | 280,949 | ||||||||
Obligations of state
and political
subdivisions |
2,164 | 465,803 | | 467,967 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
| 76,312 | | 76,312 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
32,179 | 440,127 | 472,306 | |||||||||||||
Other securities |
5,813 | | | 5,813 | ||||||||||||
$ | 40,156 | $ | 1,263,191 | $ | | $ | 1,303,347 | |||||||||
Trading investment securities |
$ | 4,779 | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,779 |
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but
are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence
of impairment). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis include the following at September 30, 2009:
Impaired Loans Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral
if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using
Level 2 inputs based on observable market data or Level 3 input based on the discounting of
the collateral. At September 30, 2009, impaired loans with a carrying value of $14.6
million were reduced by specific valuation allowance totaling $2.9 million resulting in a
net fair value of $11.7 million, based on Level 3 inputs.
Loans Held for Sale Loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or fair value.
In determining whether the fair value of loans held for sale is less than cost when quoted
market prices are not available, the Company considers investor commitments/contracts.
These loans are considered Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At September 30, 2009, the
Companys mortgage loans held for sale and student loans held for sale were recorded at cost
as fair value exceeded cost.
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
and non-recurring basis include other real estate owned, goodwill and other intangible assets and
other non-financial long-lived assets. Such amounts were not significant to the Company at
September 30, 2009.
The Company is required under current authoritative guidance to disclose the estimated fair value
of their financial instrument assets and liabilities including those subject to the requirements
discussed above. For the Company, as for most financial institutions, substantially all of its
assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments, as defined. Many of the Companys
financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing
buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction.
18
Table of Contents
The estimated fair value amounts of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is required to interpret data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize
in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
In addition, reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely due to the
wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates that must be made given the
absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments. This lack of uniform
valuation methodologies also introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair
values.
Financial instruments with stated maturities have been valued using a present value discounted cash
flow with a discount rate approximating current market for similar assets and liabilities.
Financial instruments assets with variable rates and financial instrument liabilities with no
stated maturities have an estimated fair value equal to both the amount payable on demand and the
carrying value.
The carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Companys contractual off-balance-sheet
unfunded lines of credit, loan commitments and letters of credit, which are generally priced at
market at the time of funding, are not material.
The estimated fair values and carrying values of all financial instruments under current
authoritative guidance at September 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
Estimated | ||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 89,326 | $ | 89,326 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
38,045 | 38,045 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
23,884 | 23,884 | ||||||
Trading securities |
4,779 | 4,779 | ||||||
Held to maturity securities |
15,324 | 15,824 | ||||||
Available for sale securities |
1,303,347 | 1,303,347 | ||||||
Net loans |
1,428,865 | 1,420,993 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
18,873 | 18,873 | ||||||
Deposits with stated maturities |
686,131 | 688,924 | ||||||
Deposits with no stated maturities |
1,772,772 | 1,772,772 | ||||||
Short term borrowings |
160,401 | 160,401 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,492 | 1,492 |
19
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used in this
Form 10-Q, words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, predict,
project, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or management, identify forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to our
management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those listed in Item 1A-
Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the following:
| General economic conditions, including our local and national real estate markets and employment trends; | ||
| Volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets; | ||
| Legislative, tax and regulatory actions and reforms; | ||
| Political instability; | ||
| The ability of the Federal government to deal with the national economic slowdown and the terms of any stimulus package enacted by Congress; | ||
| Competition from other financial institutions and financial holding companies; | ||
| The effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System; | ||
| Changes in the demand for loans; | ||
| Fluctuations in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio and in the level of the allowance for loan losses; | ||
| The accuracy of our estimates of future loan losses; | ||
| The accuracy of our estimates and assumptions regarding the performance of our securities portfolio; | ||
| Soundness of other financial institutions with which we have transactions; | ||
| Inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; | ||
| Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; | ||
| Anticipated increases in deposit insurance assessments by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); | ||
| Our ability to attract deposits; | ||
| Consequences of continued bank mergers and acquisitions in our market area, resulting in fewer but much larger and stronger competitors; | ||
| Expansion of operations, including branch openings, new product offerings and expansion into new markets; | ||
| Acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses; and | ||
| Acts of God or of war or terrorism. |
Such statements reflect the current views of our management with respect to future events and are
subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results
of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by this paragraph. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
20
Table of Contents
Introduction
As a multi-bank financial holding company, we generate most of our revenue from interest on loans
and investments, trust fees, and service charges. Our primary source of funding for our loans and
investments are deposits held by our subsidiary banks. Our largest expenses are interest on these
deposits and salaries and related employee benefits. We usually measure our performance by
calculating our return on average assets, return on average equity, our regulatory leverage and
risk based capital ratios, and our efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing noninterest
expense by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and noninterest income.
The following discussion of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q as well as
those included in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare consolidated financial statements based on the selection of certain accounting policies,
generally accepted accounting principles and customary practices in the banking industry. These
policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and assumptions.
We deem a policy critical if (1) the accounting estimate required us to make assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimate; and (2) different
estimates that reasonably could have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting
estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on
the financial statements.
The following discussion addresses (1) our allowance for loan losses and our provision for loan
losses and (2) our valuation of securities, which we deem to be our most critical accounting
policies. We have other significant accounting policies and continue to evaluate the materiality
of their impact on our consolidated financial statements, but we believe these other policies
either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are difficult or
subjective, or it is less likely they would have a material impact on our reported results for a
given period.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is an amount we believe will be adequate
to absorb probable losses on existing loans in which full collectibility is unlikely based upon our
review and evaluation of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges
to income and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries).
Our methodology is based on current accounting authoritative guidance, including guidance from the
SEC. We also follow the guidance of the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan
and Lease Losses, issued jointly by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the
Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, the National Credit Union Administration and the Office of Thrift
Supervision. We have developed a loan review methodology that includes allowances assigned to
certain classified loans, allowances assigned based upon estimated loss factors and qualitative
reserves. The level of the allowance reflects our periodic evaluation of general economic
conditions, the financial condition of our borrowers, the value and liquidity of collateral,
delinquencies, prior loan loss experience, and the results of periodic reviews of the portfolio by
our independent loan review department and regulatory examiners.
21
Table of Contents
Our allowance for loan losses is comprised of three elements: (i) specific reserves based on
probable losses on specific classified loans; (ii) general reserves that consider historical loss
rates; and (iii) a qualitative reserve based upon general economic conditions and other qualitative
risk factors both internal and external to the Company. We regularly evaluate our allowance for
loan losses to maintain an adequate level to absorb estimated probable loan losses inherent in the
loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of specific reserves include the
credit-worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and general economic
conditions. All classified loans are specifically reviewed and a specific allocation is assigned
based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans. For purposes of determining the
general reserve, the loan portfolio less cash secured loans, government guaranteed loans and
classified loans is multiplied by the Companys historical loss rates. The qualitative reserves
are determined by evaluating such things as current economic conditions and trends, changes in
lending staff, policies or procedures, changes in credit concentrations, changes in the trends and
severity of problem loans and changes in trends in volume and terms of loans.
Although we believe we use the best information available to make loan loss allowance
determinations, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making our initial determinations. A downturn in
the economy and employment could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets and
charge-offs, increased loan loss provisions and reductions in income. Additionally, as an integral
part of their examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for
loan losses. The bank regulatory agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan
loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their
examination.
Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic
and business conditions and collection efforts, the borrowers financial condition is such that
collection of principal and interest is doubtful.
Our policy requires measurement of the allowance for an impaired collateral dependent loan based on
the fair value of the collateral. Other loan impairments are measured based on the present value
of expected future cash flows or the loans observable market price.
Valuation of Securities. The Company records its available-for-sale and trading securities
portfolio at fair value.
Fair values of these securities are determined based on methodologies in accordance with current
accounting authoritative guidance. Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of
factors, including market interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates, credit ratings and
yield curves. Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where
available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on the quoted prices
of similar instruments or an estimate of fair value by using a range of fair value estimates in the
market place as a result of the illiquid market specific to the type of security.
22
Table of Contents
When the fair value of a security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time
the condition exists and the extent the fair value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is
performed to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment condition exists.
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible
other-than-temporary impairment. The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our
securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we
will have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Often, the information
available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair
value subject to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the
extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could
have a material effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Results of Operations
Performance Summary. Net earnings for the third quarter of 2009 were $14.0 million, an increase of
$625 thousand, or 4.7%, from the same period in 2008. Net earnings for the third quarter of 2009
compared to the third quarter of 2008 were positively impacted by increases in net interest income
and noninterest income and a decrease in noninterest expense, which offset the increase in the
provision for loan losses.
On a basic net earnings per share basis, net earnings were $0.67 for the third quarter of 2009, an
increase of 4.7% over $0.64 reported for the third quarter of 2008. The return on average assets
was 1.81% for the third quarter of 2009, as compared to 1.74% for the same quarter of 2008. The
return on average equity was 13.99% for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to 15.31% for the
same quarter of 2008.
Net earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 were $41.3 million, an increase of
$1.1 million, or 2.8%, compared to net earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008
of $40.1 million. The increase in net earnings for 2009 over 2008 was primarily attributable to an
increase in net interest income that offset the impact of (i) an increase in the provision for loan
losses, (ii) a decrease in noninterest income and (iii) an increase in noninterest expense,
primarily from the special FDIC insurance assessment in the second quarter of 2009.
On a basic net earnings per share basis, net earnings were $1.98 for the nine months of 2009, as
compared to $1.93 for the same period of 2008. The return on average assets was 1.78% for the
first nine months of 2009, as compared to 1.77% for the same period of 2008. The return on average
equity was 14.18% for the first nine months of 2009, as compared to 15.42% for the same period of
2008.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning
assets and interest expense on liabilities incurred to fund those assets. Our earning assets
consist primarily of loans and investment securities. Our liabilities to fund those assets consist
primarily of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits.
Tax-equivalent net interest income was $35.2 million for the third quarter of 2009, as compared to
$33.2 million for the same period last year. The increase in 2009 compared to 2008 was largely
attributable to (i) the decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities in an amount
greater than the decrease in rates earned on interest earning assets and (ii) an increase in the
volume of earning assets. Average earning assets increased $44.2 million for the third quarter of
2009 over the same period in 2008. Average tax exempt securities increased $120.7 million for the
third quarter of 2009 over the third quarter of 2008, offsetting a decrease of $64.4 million in
average loans. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $33.3 million for the third quarter
of 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The yield on earning assets decreased 36 basis
points in the third quarter of 2009, whereas the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
decreased 77 basis points, primarily due to the effects of lower interest rates.
23
Table of Contents
Tax-equivalent net interest income was $103.9 million for the first nine months of 2009, as
compared to $96.3 million for the same period last year. The increase in 2009 as compared to 2008
was largely attributable to (i) the decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities in an
amount greater than the decrease in rates earned on interest earning assets and (ii) an increase in
the volume of earning assets. Average earning assets increased $89.9 million for the first nine
months of 2009. Average taxable and tax exempt securities increased $158.3 million, offsetting a
decrease of $23.9 million in average loans. Average interest bearing liabilities were virtually
unchanged for the nine-month period of 2009 from the same period in 2008. The yield on earning
assets decreased 54 basis points in the first three quarters of 2009, whereas the rate paid on
interest-bearing liabilities decreased 105 basis points.
Table 1 allocates the change in tax-equivalent net interest income between the amount of change
attributable to volume and to rate.
Table 1 Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense (in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to Three Months Ended | Compared to Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change Attributable to | Total | Change Attributable to | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Change | Volume | Rate | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 24 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | (238 | ) | $ | (744 | ) | $ | (757 | ) | $ | (1,501 | ) | |||||||
Taxable investment securities (1) |
(82 | ) | (385 | ) | (467 | ) | 1,929 | (1,942 | ) | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities (2) |
1,869 | 83 | 1,952 | 4,654 | 424 | 5,078 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) (3) |
(1,024 | ) | (2,059 | ) | (3,083 | ) | (1,040 | ) | (10,183 | ) | (11,223 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
787 | (2,623 | ) | (1,836 | ) | 4,799 | (12,458 | ) | (7,659 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
(96 | ) | (3,381 | ) | (3,477 | ) | (323 | ) | (13,801 | ) | (14,124 | ) | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
(15 | ) | (312 | ) | (327 | ) | 275 | (1,416 | ) | (1,141 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(111 | ) | (3,693 | ) | (3,804 | ) | (48 | ) | (15,217 | ) | (15,265 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 898 | $ | 1,070 | $ | 1,968 | $ | 4,847 | $ | 2,759 | $ | 7,606 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Trading securities are included in taxable investment securities. | |
(2) | Computed on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a marginal tax rate of 35%. | |
(3) | Nonaccrual loans are included in loans. |
The net interest margin for the third quarter of 2009 was 4.92%, an increase of 19 basis
points from the same period in 2008. The net interest margin for the first nine months of 2009 was
4.85%, an increase of 21 basis points from the same period in 2008.
Our net interest margin increased from prior periods despite the volatile interest rate environment
that saw the Federal funds rate drop 400 basis points from January 2008 through September 2009. We
have been more successful in implementing floors on our loans and have improved the pricing for
loan risk, which previously we were unable to do due to competition. Additionally, we have
purchased investment securities at favorable yields. Should interest rates remain at the current
low levels through the remainder of 2009, we anticipate that the impact of lower yields on loans
and investment securities and competition for deposits may put pressure on our net interest margin.
24
Table of Contents
The net interest margin, which measures tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of
average earning assets, is illustrated in Table 2.
Table 2 Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (in thousands, except percentages):
Three months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/ | Average | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 64,838 | $ | 96 | 0.59 | % | $ | 69,599 | $ | 334 | 1.91 | % | ||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities (1) |
855,409 | 9,155 | 4.28 | 862,778 | 9,622 | 4.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities (2) |
450,508 | 7,060 | 6.27 | 329,840 | 5,108 | 6.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
1,465,423 | 22,857 | 6.19 | 1,529,811 | 25,940 | 6.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
2,836,178 | 39,168 | 5.48 | % | 2,792,028 | 41,004 | 5.84 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
95,935 | 116,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
63,795 | 65,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
36,079 | 36,781 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
63,461 | 64,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(23,674 | ) | (19,339 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,071,774 | $ | 3,055,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 1,730,708 | $ | 3,836 | 0.88 | % | $ | 1,758,371 | 7,313 | 1.65 | % | |||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
171,621 | 179 | 0.41 | 177,278 | 506 | 1.14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,902,329 | 4,015 | 0.84 | % | 1,935,649 | 7,819 | 1.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
738,625 | 753,733 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
34,143 | 18,617 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,675,097 | 2,707,999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
396,677 | 347,172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 3,071,774 | $ | 3,055,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 35,153 | $ | 33,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Analysis: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/earning assets |
5.48 | % | 5.84 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/earning assets |
0.56 | 1.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net yield on earning assets |
4.92 | % | 4.73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
25
Table of Contents
Nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/ | Average | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 49,109 | $ | 209 | 0.57 | % | $ | 93,582 | $ | 1,710 | 2.44 | % | ||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities (1) |
881,726 | 28,102 | 4.25 | 825,104 | 28,115 | 4.54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities (2) |
426,621 | 19,958 | 6.24 | 324,976 | 14,880 | 6.11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
1,504,400 | 69,015 | 6.13 | 1,528,338 | 80,238 | 7.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
2,861,856 | 117,284 | 5.48 | % | 2,772,000 | 124,943 | 6.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
102,907 | 116,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
64,526 | 63,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
36,754 | 32,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
63,674 | 64,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(22,900 | ) | (18,599 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,106,817 | $ | 3,031,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 1,744,336 | $ | 12,768 | 0.98 | % | $ | 1,770,394 | $ | 26,891 | 2.03 | % | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
191,376 | 633 | 0.44 | 166,173 | 1,775 | 1.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,935,712 | 13,401 | 0.93 | % | 1,936,567 | 28,666 | 1.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
749,383 | 728,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
32,801 | 19,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,717,896 | 2,684,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
388,921 | 347,481 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 3,106,817 | $ | 3,031,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 103,883 | $ | 96,277 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Analysis: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/earning assets |
5.48 | % | 6.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/earning assets |
0.63 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net yield on earning assets |
4.85 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Trading securities are included in taxable investment securities. | |
(2) | Computed on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a marginal tax rate of 35%. | |
(3) | Nonaccrual loans are included in loans. |
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2009 was $12.9 million, an
increase of $588 thousand, or 4.8%, as compared to the same period in 2008. This increase is
primarily due to (i) an increase of $751 thousand in the net gain on securities transactions, (ii)
an increase of $270 thousand in the gain on the sale of student loans, (iii) an increase of $100
thousand in ATM and credit card fees primarily as a result of increased use of debit cards and (iv)
an increase of $82 thousand in real estate mortgage fees. This increase was offset by (i) a
decrease of $173 thousand in trust fees, (ii) an increase of $155 thousand in net losses on the
sale of foreclosed assets and (iii) a decrease of $77 thousand in service charges on deposit
accounts.
In the third quarter of 2009, we recorded a gain of $273 thousand on the sale of approximately
$10.6 million in student loans, representing substantially all of the remainder of our student loan
portfolio. The Company has suspended its student loan origination activities as a result of
changes mandated by the Department of Education that significantly reduced the profitability of the
student loan program. The decline in trust fees reflects declines in the market values of the
equity investments under management and lower oil and gas prices, offset in part by an increase of
$46.0 million in assets under management over the prior year. The fair value of our trust assets
managed, which are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, totaled $2.03 billion at
September 30, 2009 as compared to $1.98 billion for the same date in 2008. The decline in service
charges on deposit accounts was the result of a decrease in the usage of overdraft privileges.
26
Table of Contents
Noninterest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was $36.5 million, a decrease
of $1.5 million, or 4.0%, as compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily due
to (i) the decrease of $828 thousand in net gain on sale of student loans, (ii) a decrease of $660
thousand in trust fees, (iii) a decrease of $711 thousand in service charges on deposit accounts,
and (iv) an increase of $303 thousand in the net loss on the sale of foreclosed assets. This
decrease was partially offset by (i) an increase of $439 thousand in ATM and credit card fees
primarily as a result of increased use of debit cards, (ii) an increase of $940 thousand in the net
gain on securities transactions, and (iii) an increase of $159 thousand in real estate mortgage
fees. In the first nine months of 2009, we recorded a gain of $889 thousand on the sale of
approximately $84.3 million in student loans. In the same period in 2008, we recognized a net gain
of $1.7 million on the sale of $63.6 million in student loans.
Table 3 Noninterest Income (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | 2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trust fees |
$ | 2,328 | $ | (173 | ) | $ | 2,501 | $ | 6,570 | $ | (660 | ) | $ | 7,230 | ||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
5,732 | (77 | ) | 5,809 | 16,294 | (711 | ) | 17,005 | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage operations |
731 | 82 | 649 | 2,177 | 159 | 2,018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of student loans |
273 | 270 | 3 | 889 | (828 | ) | 1,717 | |||||||||||||||||
ATM and credit card fees |
2,427 | 100 | 2,327 | 7,062 | 439 | 6,623 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net gain on securities transactions |
897 | 751 | 146 | 1,645 | 940 | 705 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sale of foreclosed assets |
(127 | ) | (154 | ) | 27 | (187 | ) | (303 | ) | 116 | ||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Check printing fees |
105 | (7 | ) | 112 | 313 | (37 | ) | 350 | ||||||||||||||||
Safe deposit rental fees |
90 | 3 | 87 | 356 | (1 | ) | 357 | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange fees |
27 | (2 | ) | 29 | 69 | (39 | ) | 108 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit life and debt protection fees |
74 | 14 | 60 | 163 | 5 | 158 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brokerage Commissions |
89 | (16 | ) | 105 | 200 | (79 | ) | 279 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest on loan recoveries |
43 | (65 | ) | 108 | 229 | (45 | ) | 274 | ||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous income |
190 | (138 | ) | 328 | 756 | (362 | ) | 1,118 | ||||||||||||||||
Total other |
618 | (211 | ) | 829 | 2,086 | (558 | ) | 2,644 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 12,879 | $ | 588 | $ | 12,291 | $ | 36,536 | $ | (1,522 | ) | $ | 38,058 | |||||||||||
Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $23.0 million, a
decrease of $367 thousand, or 1.6%, as compared to the same period in 2008. An important measure
in determining whether a banking company effectively manages noninterest expenses is the efficiency
ratio, which is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income on a
tax-equivalent basis and noninterest income. Lower ratios indicate better efficiency since more
income is generated with a lower noninterest expense total. Our efficiency ratio for the third
quarter of 2009 was 47.92% compared to 51.42% for the same period in 2008.
Salaries and employee benefits for the third quarter of 2009 totaled $12.2 million, a decrease of
$251 thousand, or 2.0%, as compared to 2008. The primary cause of this decrease was a lower level
of contributions to the Companys profit sharing plan.
27
Table of Contents
All other categories of noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2009 totaled $10.8 million, a
decrease of $116 thousand, or 1.1%, as compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in
noninterest expense was offset by a $656 thousand increase in FDIC insurance premiums. The
increase in FDIC insurance premiums is the result of having utilized FDIC premium insurance credits
in prior periods and an increase in 2009 of FDIC insurance premium rates. Net occupancy expense
decreased $227 thousand primarily as a result of lower utilities expense. ATM and debit card
interchange expenses decreased $312 thousand primarily as a result of better pricing with our
processor.
Total noninterest expense for the first nine months of 2009 was $70.3 million, an increase of $1.3
million, or 1.8%, as compared to the same period in 2008. Our efficiency ratio for the first nine
months of 2009 was 50.08% compared to 51.41% for the same period in 2008.
Salaries and employee benefits for the first nine months of 2009 totaled $36.4 million, a decrease
of $1.1 million, or 3.0%, as compared to 2008. The primary cause of this decrease was a lower level
of contributions to the Companys profit sharing plan.
All other categories of noninterest expense for the first nine months of 2009 totaled $33.9
million, an increase of $2.4 million, or 7.6%, as compared to the same period in 2008. The
increase in noninterest expense was largely the result of an increase of $3.6 million in FDIC
insurance premiums, including the special assessment of $1.4 million. It is not anticipated that
the FDIC will impose an additional special assessment in the fourth quarter of 2009, but will
require all banks to prepay by the end of 2009 their 2010 to 2012 FDIC insurance premiums,
including a 3 basis point increase in premium rate in 2011 and 2012. The increase in FDIC insurance
premiums is also the result of having utilized FDIC premium insurance credits in prior periods and
an increase in 2009 of FDIC insurance premium rates. ATM and debit card interchange expenses
decreased $761 thousand primarily as a result of better pricing with our processor. The increase
in professional and service fees of $254 thousand reflected higher costs associated with servicing
the Companys student loans and expenses related to an upgraded funds transfer system.
28
Table of Contents
Table 4 Noninterest Expense (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | 2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Salaries |
$ | 9,673 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 9,677 | $ | 28,767 | $ | 108 | $ | 28,659 | |||||||||||
Medical |
742 | (23 | ) | 765 | 2,408 | (126 | ) | 2,534 | ||||||||||||||||
Profit sharing |
689 | (234 | ) | 923 | 1,738 | (1,219 | ) | 2,957 | ||||||||||||||||
Pension |
80 | 1 | 79 | 241 | 5 | 236 | ||||||||||||||||||
401(k) match expense |
291 | 1 | 290 | 891 | 37 | 854 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payroll taxes |
655 | (7 | ) | 662 | 2,181 | 45 | 2,136 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense |
71 | 15 | 56 | 208 | 39 | 169 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total salaries and employee benefits |
12,201 | (251 | ) | 12,452 | 36,434 | (1,111 | ) | 37,545 | ||||||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
1,599 | (227 | ) | 1,826 | 4,785 | (284 | ) | 5,069 | ||||||||||||||||
Equipment expense |
1,920 | 29 | 1,891 | 5,828 | 225 | 5,603 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible amortization |
214 | (88 | ) | 302 | 652 | (265 | ) | 917 | ||||||||||||||||
FDIC assessment fees |
818 | 656 | 162 | 4,074 | 3,636 | 438 | ||||||||||||||||||
Printing, stationery and supplies |
508 | 26 | 482 | 1,405 | (28 | ) | 1,433 | |||||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data processing fees |
102 | (2 | ) | 104 | 314 | 7 | 307 | |||||||||||||||||
Postage |
367 | 16 | 351 | 1,112 | 43 | 1,069 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
306 | 4 | 302 | 830 | (83 | ) | 913 | |||||||||||||||||
Correspondent bank service charges |
204 | (99 | ) | 303 | 839 | (29 | ) | 868 | ||||||||||||||||
ATM and interchange expense |
708 | (312 | ) | 1,020 | 2,127 | (761 | ) | 2,888 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit card fees |
102 | (33 | ) | 135 | 335 | (48 | ) | 383 | ||||||||||||||||
Telephone |
327 | 8 | 319 | 993 | 9 | 984 | ||||||||||||||||||
Public relations and business
development |
354 | 18 | 336 | 953 | (70 | ) | 1,023 | |||||||||||||||||
Directors fees |
158 | 4 | 154 | 532 | 7 | 525 | ||||||||||||||||||
Audit and accounting fees |
292 | 4 | 288 | 840 | (44 | ) | 884 | |||||||||||||||||
Legal fees |
133 | 4 | 129 | 405 | (1 | ) | 406 | |||||||||||||||||
Professional and service fees |
603 | 36 | 567 | 1,941 | 254 | 1,687 | ||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory exam fees |
211 | 13 | 198 | 655 | 51 | 604 | ||||||||||||||||||
Travel |
143 | (39 | ) | 182 | 391 | (68 | ) | 459 | ||||||||||||||||
Courier expense |
136 | (83 | ) | 219 | 431 | (168 | ) | 599 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational and other losses |
344 | (158 | ) | 502 | 824 | (152 | ) | 976 | ||||||||||||||||
Other real estate |
152 | 112 | 40 | 426 | 274 | 152 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other miscellaneous expense |
1,116 | (5 | ) | 1,121 | 3,199 | (124 | ) | 3,323 | ||||||||||||||||
Total other |
5,758 | (512 | ) | 6,270 | 17,147 | (903 | ) | 18,050 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 23,018 | $ | (367 | ) | $ | 23,385 | $ | 70,325 | $ | 1,270 | $ | 69,055 | |||||||||||
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $4.8 million for the third quarter in 2009 as compared to
$5.2 million for the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates on pretax income were 25.36% and
27.93% for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rates differ
from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income earned on
certain investment securities and loans, the deductibility of dividends paid to our employee stock
ownership plan and Texas state taxes.
29
Table of Contents
Income tax expense was $14.5 million for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $15.9 million
for the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates on pretax income were 26.04% and 28.32%,
respectively, for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The effective tax
rates differ from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income
earned on certain investment securities and loans, the deductibility of dividends paid to our
employee stock ownership plan and Texas state taxes.
The decreases in the effective tax rates for the third quarter and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 over the same periods in 2008 were largely the result of an increase in tax
exempt income.
Balance Sheet Review
Loans. Our portfolio is comprised of loans made to businesses, professionals, individuals, and
farm and ranch operations located in the primary trade areas served by our subsidiary banks. Real
estate loans represent loans primarily for new home construction and owner-occupied real estate.
The structure of loans in the real estate mortgage classification generally provides repricing
intervals to minimize the interest rate risk inherent in long-term fixed rate loans. As of
September 30, 2009, total loans were $1.45 billion, a decrease of $113.3 million, as compared to
September 30, 2008. The decrease in loans is primarily due to (i) the Companys decision to suspend
its student loan originations and (ii) the decline in real estate construction loans. As compared
to September 30, 2008, commercial, financial and agricultural loans decreased $29.0 million, real
estate construction loans decreased $81.8 million, real estate mortgage loans increased $36.3
million, and consumer loans decreased $57.5 million. Loans averaged $1.47 billion during the third
quarter of 2009, a decrease of $64.4 million from the prior year average balances. Loans averaged
$1.50 billion during the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of $23.9 million from the prior year
average balances.
Table 5 Composition of Loans (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
$ | 463,723 | $ | 492,681 | $ | 485,707 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
98,736 | 164,890 | 158,000 | |||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
709,866 | 670,553 | 678,788 | |||||||||
Consumer, net of unearned income |
182,072 | 239,603 | 243,648 | |||||||||
$ | 1,454,397 | $ | 1,567,727 | $ | 1,566,143 | |||||||
At September 30, 2009, our real estate loans represent approximately 57.5% of our loan portfolio
and are comprised of (i) commercial real estate loans of 33.2%, generally owner occupied, (ii) 1-4
family residence loans of 33.1%, (iii) residential development and construction loans of 9.5%,
which includes our custom and speculation home construction loans, (iv) commercial development and
construction loans of 5.0% and (v) other loans of 19.2%.
Asset Quality. Loan portfolios of each of our subsidiary banks are subject to periodic reviews by
our centralized independent loan review group as well as periodic examinations by state and federal
bank regulatory agencies. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the judgment of
management, the collectibility of principal or interest under the original terms becomes doubtful.
Nonperforming assets, which are comprised of nonperforming loans, loans still accruing and past due
90 days or more and foreclosed assets, were $19.0 million at September 30, 2009, as compared to
$10.8 million at September 30, 2008. As a percent of loans and foreclosed assets, nonperforming
assets were 1.30% at September 30, 2009,
30
Table of Contents
as compared to 0.69% at September 30, 2008. The increased level of nonperforming assets is a
result of a slowing real estate market and national recession.
Table 6 Nonaccrual Loans, Loans Still Accruing and Past Due 90 Days or More, Restructured
Loans and Foreclosed Assets (in thousands, except percentages):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 14,585 | $ | 7,947 | $ | 9,893 | ||||||
Loans still accruing and past due 90 days
or more |
56 | 212 | 36 | |||||||||
Restructured loans |
| | | |||||||||
Foreclosed assets |
4,367 | 2,613 | 2,602 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,008 | $ | 10,772 | $ | 12,531 | ||||||
As a % of loans and foreclosed assets |
1.30 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||||
As a % of total assets |
0.62 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.39 | % |
We record interest payments received on impaired loans as interest income unless collections of the
remaining recorded investment are placed on nonaccrual, at which time we record payments received
as reductions of principal. Interest income amounts related to these non-accrual loans were not
significant for the third quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount we determine
as of a specific date to be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans in which full
collectability is unlikely based on our review and evaluation of the loan portfolio. For a
discussion of our methodology, see Critical Accounting Policies Allowance for Loan Losses
earlier in this section. The provision for loan losses was $3.7 million for the third quarter of
2009, as compared to $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2008. The provision for loan losses was
$7.1 million for the first nine months of 2009, as compared to $4.3 million for the first nine
months of 2008. The increase in the provision in 2009 was due to concern for a national recession
and a continuing higher level of nonperforming assets. As a percent of average loans, net loan
charge-offs were 0.38% for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 0.10% during the third quarter of
2008. As a percent of average loans, net loan charge-offs were 0.27% for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009 compared to 0.15% for the same period in 2008. The allowance for loan
losses as a percent of loans was 1.76% as of September 30, 2009, as compared to 1.28% as of
September 30, 2008. Included in Table 7 is further analysis of our allowance for loan losses
compared to charge-offs.
Although we believe we use the best information available to make loan loss allowance
determinations, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making our initial determinations. The current
downturn in the economy or higher unemployment could result in increased levels of nonperforming
assets and charge-offs and increased loan loss provisions, with corresponding reductions in net
income. Additionally, as an integral part of their examination process, bank regulatory agencies
periodically review the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. The banking agencies could
require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of
information available to them at the time of their examination.
31
Table of Contents
Table 7 Loan Loss Experience and Allowance for Loan Losses (in thousands, except
percentages):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 23,247 | $ | 18,677 | $ | 21,529 | $ | 17,462 | ||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
323 | 436 | 843 | 786 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate |
785 | 16 | 1,468 | 927 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
554 | 195 | 1,469 | 596 | ||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
1,662 | 647 | 3,780 | 2,309 | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
20 | 153 | 169 | 278 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate |
55 | 18 | 90 | 119 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
166 | 82 | 470 | 224 | ||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
241 | 253 | 729 | 621 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
1,421 | 394 | 3,051 | 1,688 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,706 | 1,765 | 7,054 | 4,274 | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 25,532 | $ | 20,048 | $ | 25,532 | $ | 20,048 | ||||||||
Loans at period end |
1,454,397 | 1,567,727 | 1,454,397 | 1,567,727 | ||||||||||||
Average loans |
1,465,423 | 1,529,811 | 1,504,400 | 1,528,338 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs/average loans (annualized) |
0.38 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/period-end loans |
1.76 | 1.28 | 1.76 | 1.28 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans |
174.4 | 245.7 | 174.4 | 245.7 |
Trading Securities. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, trading securities totaled $4.8 million and
$95.7 million, respectively. The trading securities portfolio is a government securities money
market fund comprised primarily of U.S. government agency securities and repurchase agreements
collateralized by U.S. government agency securities. The trading securities are carried at
estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. The Company began
investing in trading securities in 2008 to improve its yield on daily funds and to lower its
exposure on Federal funds. However, due to significantly lower interest rates, the Company has
deployed these funds in other assets.
Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities. At September 30, 2009, securities with an
amortized cost of $15.3 million were classified as securities held-to-maturity and securities with
a fair value of $1.30 billion were classified as securities available-for-sale. As compared to
December 31, 2008, the available for sale portfolio at September 30, 2009, reflected (i) an
decrease of $49.1 million in obligations of U.S. government sponsored-enterprises and agencies,
(ii) an increase of $88.0 million in obligations of states and political subdivisions, (iii) a $7.2
million increase in corporate and other bonds, and (iv) a $18.4 million increase in mortgage-backed
securities. Our mortgage related securities are backed by GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC or are collateralized
by securities backed by these agencies.
32
Table of Contents
Table 8 Composition of Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities (dollars in
thousands):
September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 14,651 | $ | 491 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 15,139 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
673 | 13 | (1 | ) | 685 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 15,324 | $ | 504 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 15,824 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | 268,628 | $ | 12,321 | $ | | $ | 280,949 | ||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
440,062 | 28,034 | (129 | ) | 467,967 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
71,509 | 4,803 | | 76,312 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
452,298 | 20,109 | (101 | ) | 472,306 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,550 | 263 | | 5,813 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,238,047 | $ | 65,530 | $ | (230 | ) | $ | 1,303,347 | |||||||
September 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 22,573 | $ | 694 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 23,260 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,003 | 13 | (4 | ) | 1,012 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 23,576 | $ | 707 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 24,272 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | 301,626 | $ | 4,249 | $ | (521 | ) | $ | 305,354 | |||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
347,158 | 3,404 | (5,083 | ) | 345,479 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
43,117 | 188 | (1,994 | ) | 41,311 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
434,759 | 4,062 | (1,986 | ) | 436,835 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,550 | 103 | | 5,653 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,132,210 | $ | 12,006 | $ | (9,584 | ) | $ | 1,134,632 | |||||||
During the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that
were classified as available-for-sale totaled $9.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively. Gross
realized gains from 2009 and 2008 securities sales totaled $897 thousand and $146 thousand,
respectively. There were no losses on securities sales during these periods. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that were classified as
available-for-sale totaled $44.9 million and $73.1 million, respectively. Gross realized gains
from 2009 and 2008 securities sales were $1.6 million and $705 thousand, respectively. There were
no losses on securities sales during these periods. The specific identification method was used to
determine cost on computing the realized gains.
33
Table of Contents
Table 9 Maturities and Yields of Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities Held at
September 30, 2009 (in thousands, except percentages):
Maturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One Year | After Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Through | Through | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity: | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
$ | 7,644 | 7.46 | % | $ | 6,777 | 6.97 | % | $ | 100 | 5.99 | % | $ | 130 | 6.59 | % | $ | 14,651 | 7.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
41 | 5.16 | 412 | 4.62 | 220 | 3.98 | | | 673 | 4.44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,685 | 7.45 | % | $ | 7,189 | 6.92 | % | $ | 320 | 4.61 | % | $ | 130 | 6.59 | % | $ | 15,324 | 7.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Maturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One Year | After Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Through | Through | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale: | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 63,432 | 3.89 | % | $ | 217,517 | 3.89 | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 280,949 | 3.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
20,398 | 6.11 | 150,675 | 5.73 | 279,412 | 6.18 | 17,482 | 6.84 | 467,967 | 6.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and other
securities |
23,988 | 4.28 | 51,521 | 5.41 | 6,616 | 7.08 | | | 82,125 | 5.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
38,780 | 5.06 | 372,430 | 4.69 | 60,933 | 5.03 | 163 | 5.83 | 472,306 | 4.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 146,598 | 4.57 | % | $ | 792,143 | 4.71 | % | $ | 346,961 | 5.99 | % | $ | 17,645 | 6.83 | % | $ | 1,303,347 | 5.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Maturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One Year | After Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Through | Through | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Available-for-Sale and | or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held- to-Maturity Securities: | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 63,432 | 3.89 | % | $ | 217,517 | 3.89 | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 280,949 | 3.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
28,042 | 6.48 | 157,452 | 5.78 | 279,512 | 6.17 | 17,612 | 6.84 | 482,618 | 6.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and other
securities |
23,988 | 4.28 | 51,521 | 5.41 | 6,616 | 7.08 | | | 82,125 | 5.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
38,821 | 5.06 | 372,842 | 4.69 | 61,153 | 5.03 | 163 | 5.83 | 472,979 | 4.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 154,283 | 4.72 | % | $ | 799,332 | 4.73 | % | $ | 347,281 | 5.99 | % | $ | 17,775 | 6.83 | % | $ | 1,318,671 | 5.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
All yields are computed on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a marginal tax rate of 35%. Yields
on available-for-sale securities are based on amortized cost. Maturities of mortgage-backed
securities are based on contractual maturities and could differ due to prepayments of underlying
mortgages. Maturities of other securities are reported at the sooner of maturity date or call
date.
34
Table of Contents
Table 10 Disclosure of Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities with Continuous
Unrealized Loss
The following tables disclose, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, our available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity securities that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for less than
12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for 12 or more months
(in thousands):
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 2,753 | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 2,161 | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 4,914 | $ | (132 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
16,267 | (101 | ) | 87 | (1 | ) | 16,354 | (102 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,020 | $ | (166 | ) | $ | 2,248 | $ | (68 | ) | $ | 21,268 | $ | (234 | ) | |||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 81,685 | $ | (521 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 81,685 | $ | (521 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
163,246 | (5,070 | ) | 912 | (20 | ) | 164,158 | (5,090 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
109,240 | (994 | ) | 38,401 | (996 | ) | 147,641 | (1,990 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
24,223 | (1,994 | ) | | | 24,223 | (1,994 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 378,394 | $ | (8,579 | ) | $ | 39,313 | $ | (1,016 | ) | $ | 417,707 | $ | (9,595 | ) | |||||||||
The number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totaled 31 at September
30, 2009. We do not believe these unrealized losses are other than temporary as (i) we do not
have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) it is more likely
than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. The
unrealized losses noted are interest rate related due to the level of interest rates at September
30, 2009. We have reviewed the ratings of the issuers and have not identified any issues related
to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities. Our
mortgage related securities are backed by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC or are collateralized by securities
backed by these agencies.
The investment portfolio had an overall tax equivalent yield of 5.09% at September 30, 2009. At
September 30, 2009, the investment portfolio had a weighted average life of 3.88 years and modified
duration of 3.40 years.
Deposits. Deposits held by subsidiary banks represent our primary source of funding. Total
deposits were $2.46 billion as of September 30, 2009, as compared to $2.56 billion as of September
30, 2008. Table 11 provides a breakdown of average deposits and rates paid for the third quarters
of 2009 and 2008 and for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
35
Table of Contents
Table 11 Composition of Average Deposits (in thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
$ | 738,625 | | % | $ | 753,733 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking |
584,036 | 0.32 | 576,655 | 0.73 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market accounts |
447,013 | 0.40 | 440,793 | 0.75 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits under $100,000 |
356,442 | 1.57 | 395,089 | 2.79 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
343,217 | 1.74 | 345,834 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,730,708 | 0.88 | % | 1,758,371 | 1.65 | % | ||||||||||
Total average deposits |
$ | 2,469,333 | $ | 2,512,104 | ||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
$ | 749,383 | | % | $ | 728,227 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking |
602,970 | 0.34 | 586,297 | 1.01 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market accounts |
437,080 | 0.44 | 429,859 | 0.91 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits under $100,000 |
363,083 | 1.77 | 406,561 | 3.34 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
341,203 | 1.96 | 347,677 | 3.59 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
1,744,336 | 0.98 | % | 1,770,394 | 2.03 | % | ||||||||||
Total average deposits |
$ | 2,493,719 | $ | 2,498,621 | ||||||||||||
Short-Term Borrowings. Included in short-term borrowings were federal funds purchased and
securities sold under repurchase agreements of $160.4 million and $196.8 million at September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are generally with
significant customers that require short-term liquidity for their funds. The average balance of
federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements was $171.6 million and
$177.3 million in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average rate paid on
federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements was 0.41% and 1.14% for the
third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average balance of federal funds purchased and
securities sold under repurchase agreements was $191.4 million and $166.2 million in the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average rate paid on federal funds
purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements was 0.44% and 1.43% for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
36
Table of Contents
Capital Resources
We evaluate capital resources by our ability to maintain adequate regulatory capital ratios to do
business in the banking industry. Issues related to capital resources arise primarily when we are
growing at an accelerated rate but not retaining a significant amount of our profits or when we
experience significant asset quality deterioration.
Total shareholders equity was $415.5 million, or 13.51% of total assets, at September 30, 2009, as
compared to $350.4 million, or 11.14% of total assets, at September 30, 2008. Included in
shareholders equity at September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, were $42.4 million and $1.6
million, respectively, in unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale, net of
related income taxes. During the third quarter of 2009, total shareholders equity averaged $396.7
million, or 12.91% of average assets, as compared to $347.2 million, or 11.37% of average assets,
during the same period in 2008.
Banking regulators measure capital adequacy by means of the risk-based capital ratio and leverage
ratio. The risk-based capital rules provide for the weighting of assets and off-balance-sheet
commitments and contingencies according to prescribed risk categories ranging from 0% to 100%.
Regulatory capital is then divided by risk-weighted assets to determine the risk-adjusted capital
ratios. The leverage ratio is computed by dividing shareholders equity less intangible assets by
quarter-to-date average assets less intangible assets. Regulatory minimums for total risk-based
and leverage ratios are 8.00% and 3.00%, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, our total
risk-based and leverage capital ratios were 19.37% and 10.83%, respectively, as compared to total
risk-based and leverage capital ratios of 16.49% and 9.63% as of September 30, 2008. We believe
by all measurements our capital ratios remain well above regulatory requirements to be considered
well capitalized by the regulators.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk results when the maturity or repricing intervals of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are different. Our exposure to interest
rate risk is managed primarily through our strategy of selecting the types and terms of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that generate favorable earnings while
limiting the potential negative effects of changes in market interest rates. We use no
off-balance-sheet financial instruments to manage or hedge interest rate risk.
Each of our subsidiary banks has an asset liability management committee that monitors interest
rate risk and compliance with investment policies; there is also a holding company-wide committee
that monitors the aggregate companys interest rate risk and compliance with investment policies.
The Company and each subsidiary bank utilize an earnings simulation model as the primary
quantitative tool in measuring the amount of interest rate risk associated with changing market
rates. The model quantifies the effects of various interest rate scenarios on projected net
interest income and net income over the next twelve months. The model measures the impact on net
interest income relative to a base case scenario of hypothetical fluctuations in interest rates
over the next twelve months. These simulations incorporate assumptions regarding balance sheet
growth and mix, pricing and the repricing and maturity characteristics of the existing and
projected balance sheet.
As of September 30, 2009, the model simulations projected that 100 and 200 basis point increases in
interest rates would result in positive variances in net interest income of 0.34% and 1.03%,
respectively, relative to the base case over the next twelve months, while decreases in interest
rates of 50 basis points would result in a negative variance in a net interest income of 0.04%
relative to the base case over the next twelve months. The likelihood of a decrease in interest
rates beyond 50 basis points as of September 30, 2009 is considered remote given current
interest rate levels. These are good faith estimates and
37
Table of Contents
assume that the composition of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at each
year-end will remain constant over the relevant twelve month measurement period and that changes in
market interest rates are instantaneous and sustained across the yield curve regardless of duration
of pricing characteristics of specific assets or liabilities. Also, this analysis does not
contemplate any actions that we might undertake in response to changes in market interest rates.
We believe these estimates are not necessarily indicative of what actually could occur
in the event of immediate interest rate increases or decreases of this magnitude. As
interest-bearing assets and liabilities reprice in different time frames and proportions to market
interest rate movements, various assumptions must be made based on historical relationships of
these variables in reaching any conclusion. Since these correlations are based on competitive and
market conditions, we anticipate that our future results will likely be different from the
foregoing estimates, and such differences could be material.
Should we be unable to maintain a reasonable balance of maturities and repricing of our
interest-earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities, we could be required to dispose of
our assets in an unfavorable manner or pay a higher than market rate to fund our activities. Our
asset liability committees oversee and monitor this risk.
Liquidity
Liquidity is our ability to meet cash demands as they arise. Such needs can develop from loan
demand, deposit withdrawals or acquisition opportunities. Potential obligations resulting from the
issuance of standby letters of credit and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loan
customers are other factors affecting our liquidity needs. Many of these obligations and
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore the total commitment amounts
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements affecting our liquidity position. The
potential need for liquidity arising from these types of financial instruments is represented by
the contractual notional amount of the instrument. Asset liquidity is provided by cash and assets
which are readily marketable or which will mature in the near future. Liquid assets include cash,
federal funds sold, and short-term investments in time deposits in banks. Liquidity is also
provided by access to funding sources, which include core depositors and correspondent banks that
maintain accounts with and sell federal funds to our subsidiary banks. Other sources of funds
include our ability to borrow from short-term sources, such as purchasing federal funds from
correspondents and sales of securities under agreements to repurchase, which amounted to $160.4
million at September 30, 2009, and an unfunded $50.0 million line of credit established with a
nonaffiliated bank which matures on December 31, 2009. First Financial Bank, N. A., Abilene also
has federal funds purchased lines of credit with two non-affiliated banks totaling $60.0 million.
No amount was outstanding at September 30, 2009.
On December 19, 2008, we renewed our loan agreement, effective December 31, 2008, with The Frost
National Bank. Under the loan agreement, as renewed and amended, we are permitted to draw up to
$50.0 million on a revolving line of credit. Prior to December 31, 2009, interest is paid quarterly
at Wall Street Journal Prime, and the line of credit matures December 31, 2009. If a balance exists
at December 31, 2009, the principal balance converts to a term facility payable quarterly over five
years and interest is paid quarterly at our election at Wall Street Journal Prime plus 50 basis
points or LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The line of credit is unsecured for an outstanding balance
less than or equal to $25.0 million and secured by the stock of a subsidiary bank should the
balance exceed $25.0 million. Among other provisions in the credit agreement, we must satisfy
certain financial covenants during the term of the loan agreement, including, without limitation,
covenants that require us to maintain certain capital, tangible net worth, loan loss reserve,
non-performing asset and cash flow coverage ratio. In addition, the credit agreement contains
certain operational covenants, that among others, restricts the payment of dividends above 55% of
consolidated net income, limits the incurrence of debt (excluding any amounts acquired in an
acquisition) and prohibits the disposal of assets except in the ordinary course of
38
Table of Contents
business. Effective June 30, 2009, the loan agreement was amended to change the definition of net
income to add back the FDIC special assessment for 2009 as it relates to the calculation of return
on equity, return on assets and dividends. Since 1995, we have historically declared dividends as a
percentage of our consolidated net income in a range of 37% (low) in 1995 to 53% (high) in 2003 and
2006. There was no outstanding balance under the line of credit as of September 30, 2009, or
December 31, 2008.
Given the strong core deposit base, relatively low loan to deposit ratios maintained at our
subsidiary banks and dividend capacity of our subsidiary banks we consider our current liquidity
position to be adequate to meet our short- and long-term liquidity needs.
In addition, we anticipate that any future acquisition of financial institutions, expansion of
branch locations or offering of new products could also place a demand on our cash resources.
Available cash at our parent company, which totaled $36.3 million at September 30, 2009, investment
securities which totaled $10.8 million, available dividends from subsidiary banks which totaled
$44.9 million at September 30, 2009, utilization of available lines of credit, and future debt or
equity offerings are expected to be the source of funding for these potential acquisitions or
expansions. On October 1, 2009, our subsidiary banks paid an aggregate of $10.9 million in
dividends to the parent company related to second quarter earnings. Existing cash resources at our
subsidiary banks may also be used as a source of funding for these potential acquisitions or
expansions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk
in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial
instruments include unfunded lines of credit, commitments to extend credit and federal funds sold
and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in our consolidated balance sheets.
Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial
instrument for unfunded lines of credit, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit
is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. We generally use the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance-sheet
instruments.
Unfunded lines of credit and commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as
long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. These commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each
customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, as we deem
necessary upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, and
equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issue to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially
the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The average collateral value
held on letters of credit usually exceeds the contract amount.
39
Table of Contents
Table 12 Commitments as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
Total Notional | ||||
Amounts | ||||
Committed | ||||
Unfunded lines of credit |
$ | 247,968 | ||
Unfunded commitments to extend credit |
45,155 | |||
Standby letters of credit |
13,941 | |||
Total commercial commitments |
$ | 307,064 | ||
We believe we have no other off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions with
unconsolidated, special purpose entities that would expose us to liability that is not reflected on
the face of the financial statements.
Parent Company Funding. Our ability to fund various operating expenses, dividends, and cash
acquisitions is generally dependent on our own earnings (without giving effect to our
subsidiaries), cash reserves and funds derived from our subsidiary banks. These funds historically
have been produced by intercompany dividends and management fees that are limited to reimbursement
of actual expenses. We anticipate that our recurring cash sources will continue to include
dividends and management fees from our subsidiary banks. At September 30, 2009, approximately
$44.9 million was available for the payment of intercompany dividends by the subsidiaries without
the prior approval of regulatory agencies.
Dividends. Our long-term dividend policy is to pay cash dividends to our shareholders of between
40% and 55% of net earnings while maintaining adequate capital to support growth. The cash
dividend payout ratios have amounted to 51.46% and 51.81% of net earnings, respectively, for the
first three quarters of 2009 and the same period in 2008. Given our current capital position and
projected earnings and asset growth rates, we do not anticipate any significant change in our
current dividend policy.
Each state bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System and each national banking
association is required by federal law to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board
and the OCC, respectively, to declare and pay dividends if the total of all dividends declared in
any calendar year would exceed the total of (1) such banks net profits (as defined and interpreted
by regulation) for that year plus (2) its retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by
regulation) for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus. In
addition, these banks may only pay dividends to the extent that retained net profits (including the
portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined by regulation).
To pay dividends, we and our subsidiary banks must maintain adequate capital above regulatory
guidelines. In addition, if the applicable regulatory authority believes that a bank under its
jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending
on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), the authority may
require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from the unsafe practice. The
Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the OCC have each indicated that paying dividends that deplete
a banks capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The
Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC have issued policy statements that recommend that bank
holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends out of current operating
earnings.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Management considers interest rate risk to be a significant market risk for the Company. See Item
2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Capital Resources Interest Rate Risk for disclosure regarding this market risk.
40
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
As of September 30, 2009, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our management, which includes our
principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, does not expect that our
disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints; additionally, the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and
that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based, in part,
upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over
time, controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions; also the degree of compliance
with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded based on our
evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, that our disclosure controls and procedures,
as defined, under Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are effective at the
reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2009.
Subsequent to our evaluation, there were no significant changes in internal controls or other
factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these
internal controls.
41
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
3.1
|
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2006). | ||
3.2
|
| Amended and Restated Bylaws, and all amendments thereto, of the Registrant (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the ended December 31, 2008). | ||
4.1
|
| Specimen certificate of First Financial Common Stock (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3 of the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-A filed on Form 8-A/A No. 1 on January 7, 1994). | ||
10.1
|
| Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated October 28, 1992, between the Registrant and Kenneth T. Murphy (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002). | ||
10.2
|
| Revised Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated December 28, 1995, between the Registrant and Kenneth T. Murphy (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002). | ||
10.3
|
| Executive Recognition Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report filed July 3, 2006). | ||
10.4
|
| 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). | ||
10.5
|
| 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Appendix A of the Registrants Schedule 14a Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders). | ||
10.6
|
| Loan agreement dated December 31, 2004, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 31, 2004). | ||
10.7
|
| First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 28, 2005, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 28, 2005). | ||
10.8
|
| Second Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 31, 2006, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 31, 2006). | ||
10.9
|
| Third Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 31, 2007). | ||
10.10
|
| Fourth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated July 24, 2008, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrants Form 10-Q filed July 25, 2008). | ||
10.11
|
| Fifth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008). | ||
10.12
|
| Sixth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated June 16, 2009, signed June 30, 2009, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2009). | ||
*31.1
|
| Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. | ||
*31.2
|
| Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. |
42
Table of Contents
*32.1
|
| Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. | ||
*32.2
|
| Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. |
* | Filed herewith |
43
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. | ||||||
Date: November 3, 2009
|
By: | /s/ F. Scott Dueser
|
||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: November 3, 2009
|
By: | /s/ J. Bruce Hildebrand
|
||||
Executive Vice President and | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
44