FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Commission file number 0-7674
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas | 75-0944023 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
400 Pine Street, Abilene, Texas 79601
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(325) 627-7155
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of July 31, 2009:
Class | Number of Shares Outstanding | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share | 20,816,090 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I |
||||
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Item |
Page | |||
1. Financial Statements |
3 | |||
2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
19 | |||
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
39 | |||
4. Controls and Procedures |
39 | |||
PART II
|
||||
OTHER INFORMATION |
||||
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
41 | |||
6. Exhibits |
42 | |||
Signatures |
43 |
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
The consolidated balance sheets of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) at June 30,
2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, the consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive
earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and changes in shareholders
equity and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, follow on pages 4 through 8.
3
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS |
$ | 102,339,248 | $ | 151,741,843 | $ | 137,569,957 | ||||||
FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD |
26,375,000 | 107,920,000 | 27,660,000 | |||||||||
INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS IN BANKS |
17,252,374 | 4,478,115 | 3,658,037 | |||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
145,966,622 | 264,139,958 | 168,887,994 | |||||||||
TRADING SECURITIES, at fair value |
31,188,674 | 30,794,378 | 55,990,882 | |||||||||
SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY (fair value of $19,746,289,
$24,942,002 and $24,072,925 at June 30, 2009 and 2008
and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
19,277,615 | 24,222,291 | 23,493,088 | |||||||||
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE, at fair value |
1,250,784,162 | 1,098,885,011 | 1,238,921,868 | |||||||||
LOANS |
||||||||||||
Held for investment |
1,462,884,525 | 1,505,004,840 | 1,511,420,878 | |||||||||
Held for sale |
16,237,278 | 7,537,241 | 54,721,837 | |||||||||
1,479,121,803 | 1,512,542,081 | 1,566,142,715 | ||||||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
(23,246,778 | ) | (18,676,915 | ) | (21,528,860 | ) | ||||||
Net loans |
1,455,875,025 | 1,493,865,166 | 1,544,613,855 | |||||||||
BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, net |
63,806,862 | 63,513,569 | 65,675,138 | |||||||||
INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
63,564,937 | 64,592,409 | 64,002,968 | |||||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
47,071,492 | 44,652,379 | 50,798,861 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,077,535,389 | $ | 3,084,665,161 | $ | 3,212,384,654 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
NONINTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS |
$ | 741,242,165 | $ | 807,681,419 | $ | 797,077,004 | ||||||
INTEREST-BEARING DEPOSITS |
1,731,273,077 | 1,760,940,039 | 1,785,676,148 | |||||||||
Total deposits |
2,472,515,242 | 2,568,621,458 | 2,582,753,152 | |||||||||
DIVIDENDS PAYABLE |
7,076,967 | 7,069,362 | 7,071,342 | |||||||||
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS |
176,672,781 | 149,894,715 | 235,598,268 | |||||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
32,411,300 | 15,169,002 | 18,179,664 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,688,676,290 | 2,740,754,537 | 2,843,602,426 | |||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Common stock $0.01 par value, authorized 40,000,000 shares; |
||||||||||||
20,814,760, 20,792,309, and 20,799,198 shares issued
at June 30, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
208,148 | 207,923 | 207,992 | |||||||||
Capital surplus |
268,608,275 | 267,761,861 | 268,087,449 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
102,756,184 | 77,377,884 | 89,637,172 | |||||||||
Treasury stock (shares at cost: 160,438, 158,949, and 158,811 at
June 30, 2009 and 2008, and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
(3,671,412 | ) | (3,344,178 | ) | (3,500,436 | ) | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
3,671,412 | 3,344,178 | 3,500,436 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) |
17,286,492 | (1,437,044 | ) | 10,849,615 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
388,859,099 | 343,910,624 | 368,782,228 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 3,077,535,389 | $ | 3,084,665,161 | $ | 3,212,384,654 | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 22,689,634 | $ | 25,664,182 | $ | 45,743,500 | $ | 54,041,270 | ||||||||
Interest on investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
9,151,393 | 9,270,122 | 18,806,422 | 18,388,507 | ||||||||||||
Exempt from federal income
tax |
4,498,998 | 3,405,905 | 8,626,861 | 6,786,927 | ||||||||||||
Interest on trading securities |
57,419 | 104,759 | 140,312 | 104,759 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold and |
||||||||||||||||
interest-bearing deposits in banks |
70,678 | 506,064 | 113,164 | 1,375,824 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
36,468,122 | 38,951,032 | 73,430,259 | 80,697,287 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits |
4,154,717 | 8,490,926 | 8,931,676 | 19,578,964 | ||||||||||||
Other |
192,647 | 439,835 | 454,392 | 1,268,467 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
4,347,364 | 8,930,761 | 9,386,068 | 20,847,431 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
32,120,758 | 30,020,271 | 64,044,191 | 59,849,856 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES |
1,588,003 | 1,441,000 | 3,348,506 | 2,509,251 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
30,532,755 | 28,579,271 | 60,695,685 | 57,340,605 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Trust fees |
2,125,783 | 2,359,307 | 4,242,289 | 4,728,358 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
5,420,816 | 5,671,396 | 10,561,888 | 11,196,383 | ||||||||||||
ATM and credit card fees |
2,426,534 | 2,263,860 | 4,635,534 | 4,295,060 | ||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage operations |
858,434 | 764,610 | 1,445,944 | 1,369,233 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on securities transactions |
498,261 | 166,414 | 747,352 | 559,057 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of student loans |
| 1,431,515 | 616,477 | 1,714,595 | ||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sale of foreclosed assets |
99,467 | (15,022 | ) | (59,262 | ) | 89,226 | ||||||||||
Other |
690,403 | 813,317 | 1,465,590 | 1,815,624 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
12,119,698 | 13,455,397 | 23,655,812 | 25,767,536 | ||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
12,241,044 | 12,545,177 | 24,233,415 | 25,093,093 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
1,566,783 | 1,651,539 | 3,186,521 | 3,242,724 | ||||||||||||
Equipment expense |
1,967,774 | 1,865,328 | 3,907,802 | 3,712,107 | ||||||||||||
Printing, stationery and supplies |
464,893 | 440,667 | 897,512 | 950,785 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance premiums |
2,305,307 | 143,171 | 3,256,288 | 276,167 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
215,830 | 304,194 | 438,031 | 614,760 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
5,595,962 | 6,058,802 | 11,385,685 | 11,780,850 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
24,357,593 | 23,008,878 | 47,305,254 | 45,670,486 | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
18,294,860 | 19,025,790 | 37,046,243 | 37,437,655 | ||||||||||||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
4,728,865 | 5,423,608 | 9,776,677 | 10,673,840 | ||||||||||||
NET EARNINGS |
$ | 13,565,995 | $ | 13,602,182 | $ | 27,269,566 | $ | 26,763,815 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE, BASIC |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.29 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE, ASSUMING DILUTION |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.29 | ||||||||
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
NET EARNINGS |
$ | 13,565,995 | $ | 13,602,182 | $ | 27,269,566 | $ | 26,763,815 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on
investment securities available-for-sale, before
income taxes |
1,257,417 | (22,404,774 | ) | 10,650,240 | (7,524,909 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized
gains on investment securities
included in net earnings, before income tax |
(498,261 | ) | (166,414 | ) | (747,352 | ) | (559,057 | ) | ||||||||
Total other items of comprehensive earnings (loss) |
759,156 | (22,571,188 | ) | 9,902,888 | (8,083,966 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) related to other items of
comprehensive earnings (loss) |
(265,705 | ) | 7,899,916 | (3,466,011 | ) | 2,829,388 | ||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS |
$ | 14,059,446 | $ | (1,069,090 | ) | $ | 33,706,443 | $ | 21,509,237 | |||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Capital | Retained | Treasury Stock | Deferred | Comprehensive | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Surplus | Earnings | Shares | Amounts | Compensation | Earnings | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2007 |
20,766,848 | $ | 207,669 | $ | 267,136,338 | $ | 64,333,921 | (155,415 | ) | $ | (3,170,304 | ) | $ | 3,170,304 | $ | 3,817,534 | $ | 335,495,462 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (unaudited) |
| | | 26,763,815 | | | | | 26,763,815 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuances (unaudited) |
25,461 | 254 | 482,642 | | | | | | 482,896 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared,
$0.66 per share (unaudited) |
| | | (13,719,852 | ) | | | | | (13,719,852 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) in
investment securities available-for-sale,
net of related income taxes (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | (5,254,578 | ) | (5,254,578 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional tax benefit related to directors
deferred compensation plan (unaudited) |
| | 30,000 | | | | | | 30,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares purchased in connection with directors
deferred compensation plan, net (unaudited) |
| | | | (3,534 | ) | (173,874 | ) | 173,874 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense (unaudited) |
| | 112,881 | | | | | | 112,881 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
20,792,309 | $ | 207,923 | $ | 267,761,861 | $ | 77,377,884 | (158,949 | ) | $ | (3,344,178 | ) | $ | 3,344,178 | $ | (1,437,044 | ) | $ | 343,910,624 | |||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2008 |
20,799,198 | $ | 207,992 | $ | 268,087,449 | $ | 89,637,172 | (158,811 | ) | $ | (3,500,436 | ) | $ | 3,500,436 | $ | 10,849,615 | $ | 368,782,228 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (unaudited) |
| | | 27,269,566 | | | | | 27,269,566 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuances (unaudited) |
15,562 | 156 | 354,497 | | | | | | 354,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared,
$0.68 per share (unaudited) |
| | | (14,150,554 | ) | | | | | (14,150,554 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain in
investment securities available-
for-sale, net of related income taxes
(unaudited) |
| | | | | | | 6,436,877 | 6,436,877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional tax benefit related to directors
deferred compensation plan (unaudited) |
| | 30,000 | | | | | | 30,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares purchased in connection with
directors deferred compensation plan,
net (unaudited) |
| | | | (1,627 | ) | (170,976 | ) | 170,976 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense (unaudited) |
| | 136,329 | | | | | | 136,329 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2009 (unaudited) |
20,814,760 | $ | 208,148 | $ | 268,608,275 | $ | 102,756,184 | (160,438 | ) | $ | (3,671,412 | ) | $ | 3,617,412 | $ | 17,286,492 | $ | 388,859,099 | ||||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 27,269,566 | $ | 26,763,815 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,897,856 | 3,955,115 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,348,506 | 2,509,251 | ||||||
Securities premium amortization (discount accretion), net |
525,905 | 185,875 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets, net |
(1,403,061 | ) | (2,519,152 | ) | ||||
Deferred federal income tax benefit |
(213,135 | ) | (667,449 | ) | ||||
Trading security activity, net |
24,802,208 | (30,794,378 | ) | |||||
Loans originated for resale |
(111,948,927 | ) | (89,824,825 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for resale |
150,971,960 | 119,579,056 | ||||||
Change in other assets |
4,142,045 | 3,047,163 | ||||||
Change in other liabilities |
1,997,681 | 2,972,575 | ||||||
Total adjustments |
76,121,038 | 8,443,231 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
103,390,604 | 35,207,046 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Activity in available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||
Sales |
35,359,157 | 69,625,614 | ||||||
Maturities |
111,156,835 | 145,885,473 | ||||||
Purchases |
(139,109,541 | ) | (227,645,540 | ) | ||||
Activity in held-to-maturity securities maturities |
4,217,076 | 2,193,300 | ||||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans |
44,357,760 | (14,646,267 | ) | |||||
Purchases of bank premises and equipment and computer software |
(1,128,090 | ) | (5,756,257 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of other assets |
1,788,500 | 1,034,669 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
56,641,697 | (29,309,008 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits |
(55,834,839 | ) | 68,500,439 | |||||
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits |
(54,403,071 | ) | (45,961,999 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in short-term borrowings |
(58,925,487 | ) | (16,371,711 | ) | ||||
Common stock transactions: |
||||||||
Proceeds from stock issuances |
354,653 | 482,896 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(14,144,929 | ) | (13,296,081 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(182,953,673 | ) | (6,646,456 | ) | ||||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(22,921,372 | ) | (748,418 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
168,887,994 | 264,888,376 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ | 145,966,622 | $ | 264,139,958 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION AND NONCASH TRANSACTIONS |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 10,016,125 | $ | 19,408,096 | ||||
Federal income tax paid |
10,305,982 | 11,535,911 | ||||||
Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets |
2,626,008 | 790,287 | ||||||
Investment securities purchased but not settled |
9,926,301 | 4,186,873 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, a Texas corporation and
a financial holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, or BHCA, and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries: First Financial Bankshares of Delaware, Inc.; First Financial
Investments of Delaware, Inc.; First Financial Bank, National Association, Abilene, Texas; First
Financial Bank, Hereford, Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Sweetwater, Texas;
First Financial Bank, National Association, Eastland, Texas; First Financial Bank, National
Association, Cleburne, Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Stephenville, Texas; San
Angelo National Bank, San Angelo, Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Weatherford,
Texas; First Financial Bank, National Association, Southlake, Texas; First Financial Bank, National
Association, Mineral Wells, Texas; First Technology Services, Inc.; First Financial Trust & Asset
Management Company, National Association; First Financial Investments, Inc.; and First Financial
Insurance Agency, Inc.
Through our subsidiary banks, we conduct a full-service commercial banking business. Our service
centers are located primarily in North Central and West Texas. Considering the braches and
locations of all our bank subsidiaries, as of June 30, 2009, we had 48 financial centers across
Texas, with ten locations in Abilene, two locations in Cleburne, three locations in Stephenville,
three locations in Granbury, two locations in San Angelo, three locations in Weatherford, and one
location each in Mineral Wells, Hereford, Sweetwater, Eastland, Ranger, Rising Star, Southlake,
Aledo, Willow Park, Brock, Alvarado, Burleson, Keller, Trophy Club, Boyd, Bridgeport, Decatur,
Roby, Trent, Merkel, Clyde, Moran, Albany, Midlothian and Glen Rose. Our trust subsidiary has six
locations in Abilene, San Angelo, Stephenville, Sweetwater, Fort Worth and Odessa, all in Texas.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position and unaudited
results of operations. All adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. However, the results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009, due to seasonality, changes in
economic conditions and credit quality, interest rate fluctuations, regulatory and legislative
changes and other factors. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted under SEC rules and regulations. Certain
reclassifications have been made to the 2008 financial statements to conform to the 2009
presentation. The Company evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure
through July 31, 2009, the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated annually for impairment as of the end of the
second quarter. No such impairment was noted as of June 30, 2009.
Note 2 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders
by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. In computing diluted
earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company
assumes that all dilutive outstanding options to purchase common stock have been exercised at the
beginning of the period (or the time of issuance, if later). The dilutive effect of the outstanding
options is reflected by application of the treasury stock method, whereby the proceeds from the
exercised options are assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price
during the respective periods. The weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing
basic earnings per common share for the
9
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were 20,809,061 and 20,786,902, respectively. The
weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share for the six
months ended June 20, 2009 and 2008 were 20,805,392 and 20,780,421, respectively. The weighted
average common shares outstanding used in computing fully diluted earnings per common share for
the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were 20,830,965 and 20,833,048, respectively. The
weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing fully diluted earnings per common
share for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were 20,821,782 and 20,816,219,
respectively.
Note 3 Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities
A summary of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities is as follows:
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 18,552 | $ | 487 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 19,005 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
726 | 16 | (1 | ) | 741 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 19,278 | $ | 503 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 19,746 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | 258,408 | $ | 11,982 | $ | | $ | 270,390 | ||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
443,777 | 8,191 | (2,714 | ) | 449,254 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
78,216 | 3,906 | (3 | ) | 82,119 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
429,230 | 14,204 | (176 | ) | 443,258 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,550 | 213 | | 5,763 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,215,181 | $ | 38,496 | $ | (2,893 | ) | $ | 1,250,784 | |||||||
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 23,082 | $ | 720 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 23,789 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,140 | 16 | (3 | ) | 1,153 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 24,222 | $ | 736 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 24,942 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | 302,781 | $ | 3,456 | $ | (1,959 | ) | $ | 304,278 | |||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
322,021 | 3,356 | (2,741 | ) | 322,636 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
43,143 | 436 | (70 | ) | 43,509 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
422,893 | 3,393 | (3,610 | ) | 422,676 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,699 | 87 | | 5,786 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,096,537 | $ | 10,728 | $ | (8,380 | ) | $ | 1,098,885 | |||||||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that were
classified as
10
available-for-sale totaled $30.0 million and $15.6 million, respectively. Gross realized gains
from 2009 and 2008 securities sales totaled $498 thousand and $166 thousand, respectively. There
were no losses on securities sales during these periods. During the six-months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, sales of investment securities that were classified as available-for-sale totaled $35.4
million and $69.6 million, respectively. Gross realized gains from 2009 and 2008 securities sales
were $747 thousand and $559 thousand, respectively. There were no losses on securities sales
during these periods. The specific identification method was used to determine cost on computing
the realized gains.
The following tables disclose, as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, our available-for-sale and held-to-
maturity securities that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for less than 12 months
and those that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for 12 or more months (in
thousands):
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 107,190 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 2,676 | $ | 185 | $ | 109,866 | $ | 2,748 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
30,809 | 176 | 43 | 1 | 30,852 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
4,994 | 3 | | | 4,994 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 142,993 | $ | 2,742 | $ | 2,719 | $ | 186 | $ | 145,712 | $ | 2,928 | ||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 118,167 | $ | 1,959 | $ | | $ | | $ | 118,167 | $ | 1,959 | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
135,209 | 2,720 | 898 | 34 | 136,107 | 2,754 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
145,248 | 2,076 | 41,022 | 1,537 | 186,270 | 3,613 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
9,097 | 70 | | | 9,097 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 407,721 | $ | 6,825 | $ | 41,920 | $ | 1,571 | $ | 449,641 | $ | 8,396 | ||||||||||||
The number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totaled 299 at June 30,
2009. We do not believe these unrealized losses are other than temporary as (1) we do not have
the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and (2) it is more likely than not that we will
not have to sell our securities prior to recovery. The unrealized losses noted are interest rate
related due to the level of interest rates at June 30, 2009. We have reviewed the ratings of the
issuers and have not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a
result of credit concerns on these securities. Our mortgage related securities are backed by GNMA,
FNMA and FHLMC or are collateralized by securities backed by these agencies.
11
Note 4 Loans And Allowance for Loan Losses
Major classifications of loans are as follows (dollars in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Commercial, financial and
agricultural |
$ | 464,377 | $ | 451,067 | $ | 485,707 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
104,168 | 181,685 | 158,000 | |||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
715,211 | 637,504 | 678,788 | |||||||||
Consumer |
195,366 | 242,286 | 243,648 | |||||||||
Total Loans |
$ | 1,479,122 | $ | 1,512,542 | $ | 1,566,143 | ||||||
Included in real estate-mortgage and consumer loans above are $4.1 million and $12.1 million,
respectively, in loans held for sale at June 30, 2009, $3.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively,
at June 30, 2008 and $2.9 million and $51.8 million, respectively, in loans held for sale at
December 31, 2008, in which the carrying amounts approximate fair value.
The Companys recorded investment in impaired loans and the related valuation allowance are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Valuation | Recorded | Valuation | Recorded | Valuation | |||||||||||||||
Investment | Allowance | Investment | Allowance | Investment | Allowance | |||||||||||||||
$ 10,242 |
$ | 2,495 | $ | 8,963 | $ | 1,113 | $ | 9,893 | $ | 2,040 | ||||||||||
The allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and December 31, 2008, is presented
below. Management has evaluated the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses by estimating the
probable losses in various categories of the loan portfolio which are identified below:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses provided for: |
||||||||||||
Loans specifically evaluated as impaired |
$ | 2,495,366 | $ | 1,113,473 | $ | 2,040,323 | ||||||
Remaining portfolio |
20,751,412 | 17,563,442 | 19,488,537 | |||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 23,246,778 | $ | 18,676,915 | $ | 21,528,860 | ||||||
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 22,651,726 | $ | 18,377,340 | $ | 21,528,860 | $ | 17,461,514 | ||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,588,003 | 1,441,000 | 3,348,506 | 2,509,251 | ||||||||||||
Loan recoveries |
231,752 | 233,107 | 487,281 | 368,346 | ||||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs |
(1,224,703 | ) | (1,374,532 | ) | (2,117,869 | ) | (1,662,196 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 23,246,778 | $ | 18,676,915 | $ | 23,246,778 | $ | 18,676,915 | ||||||||
12
Nonaccrual, loans still accruing and past due 90 days or more, restructured loans and
foreclosed assets are as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 10,242 | $ | 8,963 | $ | 9,893 | ||||||
Loans still accruing and past due 90 days
or more |
72 | | 36 | |||||||||
Restructured loans |
| | | |||||||||
Foreclosed assets |
3,755 | 1,792 | 2,602 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,069 | $ | 10,755 | $ | 12,531 | ||||||
As a % of loans and foreclosed assets |
0.95 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||||
As a % of total assets |
0.46 | 0.35 | 0.39 |
Note 5 Stock Based Compensation
The Company grants incentive stock options for a fixed number of shares with an exercise price
equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant to employees. In May 2009, the Company
granted 101,600 incentive stock options with an exercise price of $50.33 per share. The fair value
of the options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes options pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.24%; expected dividend yield
of 2.66%; expected life of 5.79 years; and expected volatility of 41.64%.
The Company recorded stock option expense totaling approximately $71 thousand and $56 thousand,
respectively, for the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The Company recorded stock
option expense totaling $136 thousand and $113 thousand, respectively, for the six month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The additional disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.
123R, Share-Based Payment have been omitted due to immateriality.
Note 6 Pension Plan
The Companys defined benefit pension plan was frozen effective January 1, 2004, whereby no
additional years of service will accrue to participants, unless the pension plan is reinstated at a
future date. The pension plan covered substantially all of the Companys employees. The benefits
for each employee were based on years of service and a percentage of the employees qualifying
compensation during the final years of employment. The Companys funding policy was and is to
contribute annually the amount necessary to satisfy the Internal Revenue Services funding
standards. Contributions to the pension plan, prior to freezing the plan, were intended to provide
not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the
future. As a result of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the Protection Act), the Company will
be required to contribute amounts in future years to fund any shortfalls. The Company evaluated
the provisions of the Protection Act as well as the Internal Revenue Services funding standards
to develop a preliminary plan for funding in future years. The Company made a
contribution totaling $1.4 million in April 2009 and $800 thousand in 2008 and continues to
evaluate future funding amounts.
Net periodic benefit costs totaling $80 thousand and $79 thousand were recorded, respectively, for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Net periodic benefit costs totaling $160 thousand
and $157 thousand were recorded, respectively, in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
13
Note 7 Recently Issued Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2009, SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (Revised 2007) replaced SFAS 141,
Business Combinations, and applies to all transactions and other events in which one entity
obtains control over one or more other businesses. FASB Staff Position No. 141(R)-1, Accounting
for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies was issued in April 2009 to amend and clarify SFAS 141R. These pronouncements
require an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the assets,
liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the acquisition
date. As a result, an acquired banks allowance for loan losses will not be brought over to the
Companys allowance for loan losses but rather be recorded at fair value at date of acquisition.
Contingent consideration is required to be recognized and measured at fair value on the date of
acquisition if the acquisition fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the
measurement period. If the acquisition date fair value of an asset acquired or a liability assumed
in a business combination that arises from a contingency cannot be determined during the
measurement period, an asset or a liability shall be recognized at the acquisition date if both the
information available for the end of the measurement period indicates that it is probable that an
asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and the amount of the
asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. This fair value approach replaces the
cost-allocation process required under SFAS 141 whereby the cost of an acquisition was
allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair value. These pronouncements also require acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as
incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was
previously the case under SFAS 141. SFAS 141R is expected to have an impact on the Companys
accounting for business combinations closing after January 1, 2009.
In March 2009, the FASB issued three FASB Staff Positions (FSP):
| No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance under U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and improve the presentation and disclosure in the financial statement. The FSP specifies that if a company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporary impaired unless there is a credit loss. The credit loss component of an other-than-temporary impaired debt security must be determined based on the companys best estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. |
| No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That are Not Orderly This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset and liability have significantly decreased and for identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. SFAS 157 does not prescribe a methodology for making significant adjustments to transactions or quoted prices when estimating fair value in these situations but this FSP states that a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. |
| No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments This FSP requires companies to provide the same fair value of financial instruments disclosures presently required on an annual basis on a quarterly interim basis. |
14
These three FSPs were effective for the period ended June 30, 2009 and did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows other than
additional disclosures.
In May 2009, SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events was issued which establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or available to be issued. SFAS 65 sets forth (i) the period after
the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements,
(ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring
after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (iii) the disclosures that an entity
should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This
pronouncement was effective for the period ended June 30, 2009 and did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140 was issued to improve the information a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, including the effect of a transfer on an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows and the transferors continuing
involvement in the transferred assets. SFAS 166 eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and changes the guidance for evaluation for consolidation. This
pronouncement is effective January 1, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) was issued to amend
previous guidance to replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with
an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a
variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (i)
the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (ii) the right to receive benefits from the
entity. The pronouncement is effective January 1, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Principles, a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 was issued and established
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source of authoritative U. S.
generally accepted accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities. Rules and interpretative releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative guidance for SEC registrants. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC
accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. The
pronouncement and the Codification will be effective in the period ending September 30, 2009 and is
not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
15
Note 8 Fair Value Disclosures
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, and as clarified with several FSPs, defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to
sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability
or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the
asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a
transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow
for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and
liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the
principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv)
willing to transact.
SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the
income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant
information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and
liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash
flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on
the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset
(replacement costs). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation
techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
| Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. |
| Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. Level 2 investments consist primarily of obligations of U.S. government sponsored enterprises and agencies, obligations of state and municipal subdivisions, corporate bonds and mortgage backed securities. |
| Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entitys own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair
value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation
hierarchy, is set forth below.
16
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market
prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use,
as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that
financial instruments are recorded at fair value. While management believes the Companys
valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of
different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments
could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities classified as available for sale and trading are reported at fair value utilizing Level
1 and Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an
independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include
dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the United States Treasury (the Treasury) yield curve,
live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information
and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things.
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the
fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (dollars in thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total Fair | |||||||||||||
Inputs | Inputs | Inputs | Value | |||||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
$ | 64,166 | $ | 1,186,618 | $ | | $ | 1,250,784 | ||||||||
Trading investment securities |
31,189 | | | 31,189 |
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject
to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of
impairment). Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring
basis include the following at June 30, 2009:
Impaired Loans Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 2 inputs based on observable market data or Level 3 input based on the discounting of the collateral. At June 30, 2009, impaired loans with a carrying value of $10.2 million were reduced by specific valuation allowance totaling $2.5 million resulting in a net fair value of $7.7 million, based on Level 3 inputs. |
Loans Held for Sale Loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or fair value. In determining whether the fair value of loans held for sale is less than cost when quoted market prices are not available, the Company considers investor commitments/contracts. These loans are considered Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At June 30, 2009, the Companys mortgage loans held for sale and student loans held for sale were recorded at cost as fair value exceeded cost. |
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
and non-recurring basis include other real estate owned, goodwill and other intangible assets and
other non-financial long-lived assets. Such amounts were not significant to the Company at June
30, 2009.
17
Under SFAS 107, the Company is required to disclose the estimated fair value of their financial
instrument assets and liabilities including those subject to the requirements of SFAS 157. For the
Company, as for most financial institutions, substantially all of its assets and liabilities are
considered financial instruments, as defined. Many of the Companys financial instruments,
however, lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller
engaging in an exchange transaction.
The estimated fair value amounts of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable
judgment is required to interpret data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize
in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
In addition, reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely due to the
wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates that must be made given the
absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments. This lack of uniform
valuation methodologies also introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair
values.
Financial instruments with stated maturities have been valued using a present value discounted cash
flow with a discount rate approximating current market for similar assets and liabilities.
Financial instruments assets with variable rates and financial instrument liabilities with no
stated maturities have an estimated fair value equal to both the amount payable on demand and the
carrying value.
The carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Companys contractual off-balance-sheet
unfunded lines of credit, loan commitments and letters of credit, which are generally priced at
market at the time of funding, are not material.
The estimated fair values and carrying values of all financial instruments covered by SFAS 157 and
SFAS 107 at June 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
Estimated | ||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 102,339 | $ | 102,339 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
26,375 | 26,375 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
17,252 | 17,252 | ||||||
Trading securities |
31,189 | 31,189 | ||||||
Held to maturity securities |
19,278 | 19,746 | ||||||
Available for sale securities |
1,250,784 | 1,250,784 | ||||||
Net loans |
1,455,875 | 1,446,625 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
19,619 | 19,619 | ||||||
Deposits with stated maturities |
709,066 | 712,537 | ||||||
Deposits with no stated maturities |
1,763,449 | 1,763,449 | ||||||
Short term borrowings |
176,673 | 176,673 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,651 | 1,651 |
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used in this
Form 10-Q, words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, predict,
project, and similar expressions, as they relate to us or management, identify forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to our
management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those listed in Item 1A-
Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the following:
| General economic conditions, including our local and national real estate markets and employment trends; | ||
| Volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets; | ||
| Legislative, tax and regulatory actions and reforms; | ||
| Political instability; | ||
| The ability of the Federal government to deal with the national economic slowdown and the terms of any stimulus package enacted by Congress; | ||
| Competition from other financial institutions and financial holding companies; | ||
| The effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System; | ||
| Changes in the demand for loans; | ||
| Fluctuations in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio and in the level of the allowance for loan losses; | ||
| Soundness of other financial institutions with which we have transactions; | ||
| Inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; | ||
| Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; | ||
| Legislative changes and other developments in student loan originations and sales; | ||
| Anticipated increases in FDIC deposit insurance assessments; | ||
| Our ability to attract deposits; | ||
| Consequences of continued bank mergers and acquisitions in our market area, resulting in fewer but much larger and stronger competitors; | ||
| Expansion of operations, including branch openings, new product offerings and expansion into new markets; | ||
| Acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses; and | ||
| Acts of God or of war or terrorism. |
Such statements reflect the current views of our management with respect to future events and are
subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results
of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by this paragraph. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
19
Introduction
As a multi-bank financial holding company, we generate most of our revenue from interest on loans
and investments, trust fees, and service charges. Our primary source of funding for our loans and
investments are deposits held by our subsidiary banks. Our largest expenses are interest on these
deposits and salaries and related employee benefits. We usually measure our performance by
calculating our return on average assets, return on average equity, our regulatory leverage and
risk based capital ratios, and our efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing noninterest
expense by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and noninterest income.
The following discussion of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q as well as
those included in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare consolidated financial statements based on the selection of certain accounting policies,
generally accepted accounting principles and customary practices in the banking industry. These
policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and assumptions.
We deem a policy critical if (1) the accounting estimate required us to make assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimate; and (2) different
estimates that reasonably could have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting
estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on
the financial statements.
The following discussion addresses (1) our allowance for loan losses and its provision for loan
losses and (2) our valuation of securities, which we deem to be our most critical accounting
policies. We have other significant accounting policies and continue to evaluate the materiality
of their impact on our consolidated financial statements, but we believe these other policies
either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are difficult or
subjective, or it is less likely they would have a material impact on our reported results for a
given period.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses is an amount we believe will be adequate to absorb inherent estimated
losses on existing loans in which full collectibility is unlikely based upon our review and
evaluation of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to income
and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries).
Our methodology is based on guidance provide in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102, Selected
Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues and includes allowance allocations
calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as
amended by SFAS No. 118, and allowance allocations determined in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. We also follow the guidance of the Interagency Policy Statement
on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, issued jointly by the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board,
the FDIC, the National Credit Union Administration and the Office of Thrift Supervision. We have
developed a loan review methodology that includes allowances assigned to certain classified loans,
allowances assigned based upon estimated loss factors and qualitative reserves. The level of the
allowance reflects our periodic evaluation of general economic conditions, the financial condition
of our borrowers, the value and liquidity of collateral, delinquencies, prior loan loss experience,
and the results of periodic reviews of the portfolio by our independent loan review department and
regulatory examiners.
20
Our allowance for loan losses is comprised of three elements: (i) specific reserves determined in
accordance with SFAS 114 based on probable losses on specific classified loans; (ii) general
reserves determined in accordance with SFAS 5 that consider historical loss rates; and (iii) a
qualitative reserve determined in accordance with SFAS 5 based upon general economic conditions and
other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company. We regularly evaluate
our allowance for loan losses to maintain an adequate level to absorb estimated loan losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of specific reserves
include the credit-worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and
general economic conditions. All classified loans are specifically reviewed and a specific
allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans. For purposes
of determining the general reserve, the loan portfolio less cash secured loans, government
guaranteed loans and classified loans is multiplied by the Companys historical loss rates. The
qualitative reserves are determined by evaluating such things as current economic conditions and
trends, changes in lending staff, policies or procedures, changes in credit concentrations, changes
in the trends and severity of problem loans and changes in trends in volume and terms of loans.
Although we believe we use the best information available to make loan loss allowance
determinations, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making our initial determinations. A downturn in
the economy and employment could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets and
charge-offs, increased loan loss provisions and reductions in income. Additionally, as an integral
part of their examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for
loan losses. The bank regulatory agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan
loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their
examination.
Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering economic
and business conditions and collection efforts, the borrowers financial condition is such that
collection of principal and interest is doubtful.
Our policy requires measurement of the allowance for an impaired collateral dependent loan based on
the fair value of the collateral. Other loan impairments are measured based on the present value
of expected future cash flows or the loans observable market price.
Valuation of Securities:
The Company records its available-for-sale and trading securities portfolio at fair value.
Fair values of these securities are determined based on methodologies in accordance with SFAS 157,
and as clarified with several FSPs. Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of
factors, including market interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates, credit ratings and
yield curves. Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where
available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on the quoted prices
of similar instruments or an estimate of fair value by using a range of fair value estimates in the
market place as a result of the illiquid market specific to the type of security.
21
When the fair value of a security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time
the condition exists and the extent the fair value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is
performed to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment condition exists.
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible
other-than-temporary impairment. The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our
securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we
will have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Often, the information
available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair
value subject to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the
extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could
have a material effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Results of Operations
Performance Summary. Net earnings for the second quarter of 2009 were $13.6 million, a decrease of
$36 thousand, or 0.3% from the same period in 2008. Net earnings for the second quarter of 2009
compared to the second quarter of 2008 were negatively impacted by a decrease in noninterest
income, including the gain on sale of student loans in the second quarter of 2008 as compared to
the second quarter of 2009 and the increase of $2.2 million in FDIC insurance premiums, including
special assessment (see below). The negative impact of these items was substantially offset by an
increase in net interest income and decreases in certain other categories of noninterest expense.
On a basic net earnings per share basis, net earnings were $0.65 for the second quarter of 2009,
unchanged from the same quarter of 2008. The return on average assets was 1.77% for the second
quarter of 2009, as compared to 1.81% for the same quarter of 2008. The return on average equity
was 13.98% for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to 15.55% for the same quarter of 2008.
Net earnings for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $27.3 million, an increase of $506
thousand, or 1.9%, compared to net earnings for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 of $26.8
million. The increase in net earnings for 2009 over 2008 was primarily attributable to an increase
in net interest income which offset the impact of the increase in FDIC insurance premiums and the
reduction in the gain on the sale of student loans.
On a basic net earnings per share basis, net earnings were $1.31 for the six-months of 2009 as
compared to $1.29 for the same period of 2008. The return on average assets was 1.76% for the
six-months of 2009, as compared to 1.78% for the same period of 2008. The return on average equity
was 14.28% for the six-months of 2009, as compared to 15.48% for the same period of 2008.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on earning
assets and interest expense on liabilities incurred to fund those assets. Our earning assets
consist primarily of loans and investment securities. Our liabilities to fund those assets consist
primarily of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits.
Tax-equivalent net interest income was $34.6 million for the second quarter of 2009, as compared to
$31.7 million for the same period last year. The increase in 2009 compared to 2008 was largely
attributable to (i) the decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities in an amount
greater than the decrease in rates earned on interest earning assets and (ii) an increase in the
volume of earning assets. Average earning assets increased $73.3 million for the second quarter of
2009 over the same period in 2008. Average taxable and tax exempt securities increased $162.8
million for the second quarter of 2009 over 2008, offsetting a decrease of $38.3 million in average
loans. Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $6.4 million for the second quarter of 2009
over the same period in 2008. The yield on earning assets decreased 41 basis points in the second
quarter of 2009, whereas the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased 97 basis points,
primarily due to the effects of lower interest rates.
22
Tax-equivalent net interest income was $68.7 million for the first six-month period of 2009, as
compared to $63.1 million for the same period last year. The increase in 2009 compared to 2008 was
largely attributable to (i) the decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities in an
amount greater than the decrease in rates earned on interest earning assets and (ii) an increase in
the volume of earning assets. Average earning assets increased $113.0 million for the first
six-months of 2009. Average taxable and tax exempt securities increased $181.0 million, offsetting
a decrease of $3.4 million in average loans. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $15.6
million for the six-month period of 2009 over 2008. The yield on earning assets decreased 63 basis
points in the six-months of 2009, whereas the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased
119 basis points.
Table 1 allocates the change in tax-equivalent net interest income between the amount of change
attributable to volume and to rate.
Table 1 Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Compared to Three Months Ended | Compared to Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change Attributable to | Total | Change Attributable to | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Change | Volume | Rate | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | (234 | ) | $ | (201 | ) | $ | (435 | ) | $ | (813 | ) | $ | (450 | ) | $ | (1,263 | ) | ||||||
Taxable investment securities (1) |
654 | (820 | ) | (166 | ) | 2,042 | (1,589 | ) | 453 | |||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities
(2) |
1,602 | 184 | 1,786 | 2,787 | 339 | 3,126 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) (3) |
(580 | ) | (2,324 | ) | (2,904 | ) | (270 | ) | (7,870 | ) | (8,140 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
1,442 | (3,161 | ) | (1,719 | ) | 3,746 | (9,570 | ) | (5,824 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
(81 | ) | (4,255 | ) | (4,336 | ) | (331 | ) | (10,316 | ) | (10,647 | ) | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
44 | (291 | ) | (247 | ) | 318 | (1,132 | ) | (814 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(37 | ) | (4,546 | ) | (4,583 | ) | (13 | ) | (11,448 | ) | (11,461 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 1,479 | $ | 1,385 | $ | 2,864 | $ | 3,759 | $ | 1,878 | $ | 5,637 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Trading securities are included in taxable investment securities. | |
(2) | Computed on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a marginal tax rate of 35%. | |
(3) | Nonaccrual loans are included in loans. |
The net interest margin, which measures tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of
average earning assets, is illustrated in Table 2.
The net interest margin for the second quarter of 2009 was 4.88%, an increase of 27 basis points
from the same period in 2008. The net interest margin for the six-months of 2009 was 4.82%, an
increase of 23 basis points from the same period in 2008.
23
Our net interest margin increased from prior periods despite the volatile interest rate environment
which saw the Federal funds rate drop 400 basis points from January 2008 through June 2009. We
have been more successful in implementing floors on our loans and have improved the pricing for
loan risk, which previously we were unable to do due to competition. Additionally we have
purchased investment securities at favorable yields. Should interest rates remain at the current
low levels through the remainder of 2009, we anticipate that the impact of lower yields on loans
and investment securities and competition for deposits may put pressure on our net interest margin.
Table 2 Average Balances and Average Yields and Rates (in thousands, except percentages):
Three months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/ | Average | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 45,286 | $ | 71 | 0.63 | % | $ | 96,494 | $ | 506 | 2.11 | % | ||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities (1) |
885,382 | 9,209 | 4.16 | 827,589 | 9,376 | 4.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities (2) |
429,542 | 6,738 | 6.27 | 324,551 | 4,952 | 6.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
1,481,792 | 22,900 | 6.20 | 1,520,043 | 25,804 | 6.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
2,842,002 | 38,918 | 5.49 | % | 2,768,677 | 40,638 | 5.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
98,906 | 118,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
64,498 | 63,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
36,135 | 30,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
63,675 | 64,746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(22,938 | ) | (18,616 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,082,278 | $ | 3,027,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 1,735,640 | $ | 4,155 | 0.96 | % | $ | 1,757,120 | $ | 8,491 | 1.94 | % | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
171,936 | 192 | 0.45 | 156,849 | 440 | 1.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,907,576 | 4,347 | 0.91 | % | 1,913,969 | 8,931 | 1.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
753,473 | 740,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
32,134 | 20,774 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,693,183 | 2,675,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
389,095 | 351,909 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 3,082,278 | $ | 3,027,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 34,571 | $ | 31,707 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Analysis: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/earning assets |
5.49 | % | 5.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/earning assets |
0.61 | 1.29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net yield on earning assets |
4.88 | % | 4.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
24
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/ | Average | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 41,115 | $ | 113 | 0.56 | % | $ | 105,705 | $ | 1,376 | 2.62 | % | ||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities (1) |
895,102 | 18,947 | 4.23 | 806,059 | 18,493 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities (2) |
414,480 | 12,899 | 6.22 | 322,517 | 9,772 | 6.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
1,524,211 | 46,157 | 6.11 | 1,527,593 | 54,298 | 7.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
2,874,908 | 78,116 | 5.48 | % | 2,761,874 | 83,939 | 6.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
106,451 | 117,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
64,898 | 63,091 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
37,096 | 31,032 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net |
63,782 | 64,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(22,507 | ) | (18,225 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,124,628 | $ | 3,019,787 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 1,751,263 | $ | 8,932 | 1.03 | % | $ | 1,776,471 | $ | 19,579 | 2.22 | % | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
201,416 | 454 | 0.45 | 160,559 | 1,268 | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1,952,679 | 9,386 | 0.97 | % | 1,937,030 | 20,847 | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
754,851 | 715,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
32,119 | 19,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,739,649 | 2,672,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
384,979 | 347,638 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 3,124,628 | $ | 3,019,787 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 68,730 | $ | 63,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Analysis: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income/earning assets |
5.48 | % | 6.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense/earning assets |
0.66 | 1.52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net yield on earning assets |
4.82 | % | 4.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Trading securities are included in taxable investment securities. | |
(2) | Computed on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a marginal tax rate of 35%. | |
(3) | Nonaccrual loans are included in loans. |
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2009 was $12.1 million, a
decrease of $1.3 million, or 9.9%, as compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is
primarily due to (i) the student loan sale in the second quarter of 2008 compared to no sales in
the second quarter in 2009, (ii) a decrease of $234 thousand in trust fees and (iii) a decrease of
$250 thousand in service charges on deposits. This large decrease was offset by (i) an increase of
$163 thousand in ATM and credit card fees primarily as a result of increased use of debit cards,
(ii) an increase of $332 thousand in the net gain on securities transactions, and (iii) an increase
of $93 thousand in real estate mortgage fees.
In the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a gain of $616 thousand on the sale of approximately
$73.7 million in student loans, representing approximately 86% of our student loan portfolio. In
the second quarter of 2008, we recognized a net gain of $1.4 million on the sale of $54.1 million
in student loans. The Company has suspended its student loan origination activities as a result of
changes mandated by the Department of Education that significantly reduced the profitability of the
student loan program. It is currently anticipated that we will sell the remaining portfolio of
student loans in the third quarter of 2009. The decline in trust fees reflects declines in the
market values of the equity investments under management and lower oil and gas prices, offset in
part by growth of $92.1 million in new business over the prior year. The fair value of our trust
assets managed, which are not reflected in our balance sheet, totaled $1.99 billion at June 30,
2009 compared to $1.92 billion for the same period of 2008. The decline in service charges on
deposit accounts was the result of a decrease in the usage of overdraft privilege.
25
Noninterest income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 was $23.7 million, a decrease of
$2.1 million, or 8.2%, as compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily due to
(i) the decrease of $1.1 million in profit from sale of student loans, (ii) a decrease of $486
thousand in trust fees and (iii) a decrease of $634 thousand in service charges on deposits. This
large decrease was offset by (i) an increase of $341 thousand in ATM and credit card fees primarily
as a result of increased use of debit cards, (ii) an increase of $188 thousand in the net gain on
securities transactions, and (iii) an increase of $77 thousand in real estate mortgage fees.
In the first six months of 2009, we recorded a gain of $616 thousand on the sale of approximately
$73.7 million in student loans, approximately 86% of our student loan portfolio. In the same
period in 2008, we recognized a net gain of $1.7 million on the sale of $63.6 million in student
loans.
Table 3 Noninterest Income (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | 2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trust fees |
$ | 2,125 | $ | (234 | ) | $ | 2,359 | $ | 4,242 | $ | (486 | ) | $ | 4,728 | ||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
5,421 | (250 | ) | 5,671 | 10,562 | (634 | ) | 11,196 | ||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage operations |
858 | 93 | 765 | 1,446 | 77 | 1,369 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of student loans |
| (1,432 | ) | 1,432 | 616 | (1,099 | ) | 1,715 | ||||||||||||||||
ATM and credit card fees |
2,427 | 163 | 2,264 | 4,636 | 341 | 4,295 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net gain on securities transactions |
498 | 332 | 166 | 747 | 188 | 559 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sale of
foreclosed assets |
99 | 114 | (15 | ) | (59 | ) | (148 | ) | 89 | |||||||||||||||
Check printing fees |
102 | (5 | ) | 107 | 208 | (30 | ) | 238 | ||||||||||||||||
Safe deposit rental fees |
95 | 2 | 93 | 266 | (4 | ) | 270 | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange fees |
23 | (20 | ) | 43 | 42 | (36 | ) | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit life and debt protection fees |
51 | 3 | 48 | 89 | (10 | ) | 99 | |||||||||||||||||
Brokerage Commissions |
54 | (36 | ) | 90 | 111 | (63 | ) | 174 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest on loan recoveries |
47 | (81 | ) | 128 | 186 | 20 | 166 | |||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous income |
320 | 16 | 304 | 564 | (228 | ) | 792 | |||||||||||||||||
Total other |
791 | (7 | ) | 798 | 1,407 | (499 | ) | 1,906 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 12,120 | $ | (1,335 | ) | $ | 13,455 | $ | 23,656 | $ | (2,112 | ) | $ | 25,768 | ||||||||||
Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2009 was $24.4
million, an increase of $1.3 million, or 5.9%, as compared to the same period in 2008. An
important measure in determining whether a banking company effectively manages noninterest expenses
is the efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net
interest income on a tax-equivalent basis and noninterest income. Lower ratios indicate better
efficiency since more income is generated with a lower noninterest expense total. Our efficiency
ratio for the second quarter of 2009 was 52.17% compared to 50.95% for the same period in 2008.
26
Salaries and employee benefits for the second quarter of 2009 totaled $12.2 million, a decrease of
$304 thousand, or 2.4%, as compared to 2008. The primary causes of this decrease were lower levels
of contributions to the Companys profit sharing plan and a reduction in salaries from reduced
headcount partially offset by a $239 thousand increase in medical costs.
All other categories of noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2009 totaled $12.1 million,
an increase of $1.7 million, or 15.8%, as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in
noninterest expense was largely the result of an increase of approximately $2.2 million in FDIC
insurance premiums, including the special assessment of $1.4 million. Depending upon the losses
sustained by the FDIC in the remainder of 2009, there may be additional special assessments. The
increase in FDIC insurance premiums is also the result of having utilized FDIC premium insurance
credits in prior periods and an increase in 2009 of FDIC insurance premium rates. Net occupancy
expense decreased $85 thousand primarily as a result of lower utilities expense. ATM and debit
card interchange expenses decreased $368 thousand primarily as a result of better pricing with our
processor.
Total noninterest expense for the first six-months of 2009 was $47.3 million, an increase of $1.6
million, or 3.6%, as compared to the same period in 2008. Our efficiency ratio for the first
six-months of 2009 was 51.21% compared to 51.40% for the same period in 2008.
Salaries and employee benefits for the first six-months of 2009 totaled $24.2 million, a decrease
of $860 thousand, or 3.4%, as compared to 2008. The primary cause of this decrease was lower levels
of contributions to the Companys profit sharing plan.
All other categories of noninterest expense for the first six months of 2009 totaled $23.1 million,
an increase of $2.5 million, or 12.1%, as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in
noninterest expense was largely the result of an increase of almost $3.0 million in FDIC insurance
premiums, including the special assessment of $1.4 million. Depending upon the losses sustained by
the FDIC in the remainder of 2009, there may be additional special assessments. The increase in
FDIC insurance premiums is also the result of having utilized FDIC premium insurance credits in
prior periods and an increase in 2009 of FDIC insurance premium rates. ATM and debit card
interchange expenses decreased $450 thousand primarily as a result of better pricing with our
processor. The increase in professional and service fees reflected higher costs associated with
servicing the Companys student loans.
27
Table 4 Noninterest Expense (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | 2009 | (Decrease) | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Salaries |
$ | 9,584 | $ | (146 | ) | $ | 9,730 | $ | 19,095 | $ | 113 | $ | 18,982 | |||||||||||
Medical |
949 | 239 | 710 | 1,666 | (103 | ) | 1,769 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit sharing |
555 | (434 | ) | 989 | 1,050 | (984 | ) | 2,034 | ||||||||||||||||
Pension |
80 | 1 | 79 | 160 | 3 | 157 | ||||||||||||||||||
401(k) match expense |
298 | 19 | 279 | 601 | 37 | 564 | ||||||||||||||||||
Payroll taxes |
704 | 2 | 702 | 1,525 | 51 | 1,474 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock option expense |
71 | 15 | 56 | 136 | 23 | 113 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total salaries and employee benefits |
12,241 | (304 | ) | 12,545 | 24,233 | (860 | ) | 25,093 | ||||||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
1,567 | (85 | ) | 1,652 | 3,187 | (56 | ) | 3,243 | ||||||||||||||||
Equipment expense |
1,968 | 103 | 1,865 | 3,908 | 196 | 3,712 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible amortization |
216 | (88 | ) | 304 | 438 | (177 | ) | 615 | ||||||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data processing fees |
106 | 4 | 102 | 212 | 9 | 203 | ||||||||||||||||||
Postage |
363 | (2 | ) | 365 | 745 | 28 | 717 | |||||||||||||||||
Printing, stationery and supplies |
465 | 24 | 441 | 898 | (53 | ) | 951 | |||||||||||||||||
Advertising |
276 | (53 | ) | 329 | 523 | (88 | ) | 611 | ||||||||||||||||
Correspondent bank service charges |
323 | 23 | 300 | 635 | 70 | 565 | ||||||||||||||||||
ATM and interchange expense |
618 | (368 | ) | 986 | 1,418 | (450 | ) | 1,868 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit card fees |
113 | (18 | ) | 131 | 233 | (16 | ) | 249 | ||||||||||||||||
Telephone |
333 | (11 | ) | 344 | 665 | | 665 | |||||||||||||||||
Public relations and business |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
development |
314 | (13 | ) | 327 | 599 | (87 | ) | 686 | ||||||||||||||||
Directors fees |
180 | (4 | ) | 184 | 374 | 3 | 371 | |||||||||||||||||
Audit and accounting fees |
304 | (70 | ) | 374 | 631 | (42 | ) | 673 | ||||||||||||||||
Legal fees |
131 | (39 | ) | 170 | 272 | (5 | ) | 277 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional and service fees |
591 | 70 | 521 | 1,337 | 217 | 1,120 | ||||||||||||||||||
Regulatory exam fees |
224 | 24 | 200 | 443 | 37 | 406 | ||||||||||||||||||
FDIC assessment fees |
2,305 | 2,162 | 143 | 3,256 | 2,980 | 276 | ||||||||||||||||||
Travel |
146 | (9 | ) | 155 | 248 | (29 | ) | 277 | ||||||||||||||||
Courier expense |
140 | (49 | ) | 189 | 295 | (85 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||||||||
Operational and other losses |
337 | 58 | 279 | 479 | 5 | 474 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other miscellaneous expense |
1,097 | (6 | ) | 1,103 | 2,276 | 38 | 2,238 | |||||||||||||||||
Total other |
8,366 | 1,723 | 6,643 | 15,539 | 2,532 | 13,007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 24,358 | $ | 1,349 | $ | 23,009 | $ | 47,305 | $ | 1,635 | $ | 45,670 | ||||||||||||
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $4.7 million for the second quarter in 2009 as compared
to $5.4 million for the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates on pretax income were 25.8%
and 28.5% for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective tax rates differ
from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income earned on
certain investment securities and loans, the deductibility of dividends paid to our employee stock
ownership plan and Texas state taxes.
28
Income tax expense was $9.8 million for the first six months of 2009 as compared to $10.7 million
for the same period in 2008. Our effective tax rates on pretax income were 26.4% and 28.5%,
respectively, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The effective tax rates
differ from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income earned
on certain investment securities and loans, the deductibility of dividends paid to our employee
stock ownership plan and Texas state taxes.
Balance Sheet Review
Loans. Our portfolio is comprised of loans made to businesses, professionals, individuals, and
farm and ranch operations located in the primary trade areas served by our subsidiary banks. Real
estate loans represent loans primarily for new home construction and owner-occupied real estate.
The structure of loans in the real estate mortgage classification generally provides repricing
intervals to minimize the interest rate risk inherent in long-term fixed rate loans. As of June
30, 2009, total loans were $1.48 billion, a decrease of $33.4 million, as compared to June 30,
2008. As compared to June 30, 2008, commercial, financial and agricultural loans increased $16.3
million, real estate construction loans decreased $77.5 million, real estate mortgage loans
increased $77.7 million, and consumer loans decreased $46.9 million. Included in consumer loans
were student loans held for sale of $12.1 million as of June 30, 2009. Loans averaged $1.48
billion during the second quarter of 2009, a decrease of $38.3 million from the prior year average
balances. Loans averaged $1.52 billion during the first half of 2009, a decrease of $3.4 million
from the prior year average balances.
Table 5 Composition of Loans (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
$ | 464,377 | $ | 451,067 | $ | 485,707 | ||||||
Real estate construction |
104,168 | 181,685 | 158,000 | |||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
715,211 | 637,504 | 678,788 | |||||||||
Consumer, net of unearned income |
195,366 | 242,286 | 243,648 | |||||||||
$ | 1,479,122 | $ | 1,512,542 | $ | 1,566,143 | |||||||
At June 30, 2009, our real estate loans represent approximately 55.3% of our loan portfolio and are
comprised of (i) commercial real estate loans of 32.8%, generally owner occupied, (ii) 1-4 family
residence loans of 33.0%, (iii) residential development and construction loans of 9.4%, which
includes our custom and speculation home construction loans, (iv) commercial development and
construction loans of 5.2% and (v) other loans of 19.6%.
Asset Quality. Loan portfolios of each of our subsidiary banks are subject to periodic reviews by
our centralized independent loan review group as well as periodic examinations by state and federal
bank regulatory agencies. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in the judgment of
management, the collectibility of principal or interest under the original terms becomes doubtful.
Nonperforming assets, which are comprised of nonperforming loans, loans still accruing and past due
90 days or more and foreclosed assets, were $14.1 million at June 30, 2009, as compared to $10.8
million at June 30, 2008. As a percent of loans and foreclosed assets, nonperforming assets were
0.95% at June 30, 2009, as compared to 0.71% at June 30, 2008. The increased level of nonperforming
assets is a result of a slowing real estate market and national recession. We are not aware of any
material classified credit not properly disclosed as nonperforming at June 30, 2009.
29
Table 6 Nonaccrual Loans, Loans Still Accruing and Past Due 90 Days or More, Restructured
Loans and Foreclosed Assets (in thousands, except percentages):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 10,242 | $ | 8,963 | $ | 9,893 | ||||||
Loans still accruing and past due 90 days
or more |
72 | | 36 | |||||||||
Restructured loans |
| | | |||||||||
Foreclosed assets |
3,755 | 1,792 | 2,602 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,069 | $ | 10,755 | $ | 12,531 | ||||||
As a % of loans and foreclosed assets |
0.95 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||||
As a % of total assets |
0.46 | 0.35 | 0.39 |
We record interest payments received on impaired loans as interest income unless collections of the
remaining recorded investment are placed on nonaccrual, at which time we record payments received
as reductions of principal. Interest income amounts related to these non-accrual loans were not
significant for the second quarter and six month periods of 2009 and 2008.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount we determine
as of a specific date to be adequate to provide for losses on loans that we deem are uncollectible.
We determine the allowance and the required provision expense by reviewing general loss experience
and the performance of specific credits. The provision for loan losses was $1.6 million for the
second quarter of 2009 as compared to $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2008. The provision
for loan losses was $3.3 million for the first six months of 2009 as compared to $2.5 million for
the first six months of 2008. The increase in the provision in 2009 was due to concern for a
national recession and a continuing higher level of nonperforming assets. As a percent of average
loans, net loan charge-offs were 0.27% for the second quarter of 2009 compared to 0.30% during the
second quarter of 2008. As a percent of average loans, net loan charge-offs were 0.22% for the
six-month period of 2009 compared to 0.17% for the same period in 2008. The allowance for loan
losses as a percent of loans was 1.57% as of June 30, 2009, as compared to 1.23% as of June 30,
2008. Included in Table 7 is further analysis of our allowance for loan losses compared to
charge-offs.
Although we believe we use the best information available to make loan loss allowance
determinations, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions
differ substantially from the assumptions used in making our initial determinations. The current
downturn in the economy or higher unemployment could result in increased levels of nonperforming
assets and charge-offs, increased loan loss provisions and reductions in income. Additionally, as
an integral part of their examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our
allowance for loan losses. The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the
loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their
examination.
30
Table 7 Loan Loss Experience and Allowance for Loan Losses (in thousands, except percentages): |
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period, |
$ | 22,652 | $ | 18,377 | $ | 21,529 | $ | 17,462 | ||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
204 | 243 | 519 | 350 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate |
491 | 850 | 683 | 911 | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
530 | 281 | 916 | 401 | ||||||||||||
Total charge-offs |
1,225 | 1,374 | 2,118 | 1,662 | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
(72 | ) | (79 | ) | (148 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||||
Real Estate |
(20 | ) | (97 | ) | (35 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||
Consumer |
(140 | ) | (57 | ) | (304 | ) | (143 | ) | ||||||||
Total recoveries |
(232 | ) | (233 | ) | (487 | ) | (368 | ) | ||||||||
Net charge-offs |
993 | 1,141 | 1,631 | 1,294 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
1,588 | 1,441 | 3,349 | 2,509 | ||||||||||||
Balance at June 30 |
$ | 23,247 | $ | 18,677 | $ | 23,247 | $ | 18,677 | ||||||||
Loans at period end |
$ | 1,479,122 | $ | 1,512,542 | $ | 1,479,122 | $ | 1,512,542 | ||||||||
Average loans |
1,481,792 | 1,520,043 | 1,524,211 | 1,527,593 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs/average loans (annualized) |
0.27 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.17 | % | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/period-end loans |
1.57 | 1.23 | 1.57 | 1.23 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans |
225.39 | 208.38 | 225.39 | 208.38 |
Trading Securities. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, trading securities totaled $31.2 million
and $30.8 million, respectively. The trading securities portfolio is a government securities money
market fund comprised primarily of U.S. government agency securities and repurchase agreements
collateralized by U.S. government agency securities. The trading securities are carried at
estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. The Company began
investing in trading securities in 2008 to improve its yield on daily funds and to lower its
exposure on Federal funds.
Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities. At June 30, 2009, securities with an amortized
cost of $19.3 million were classified as securities held-to-maturity and securities with a fair
value of $1.25 billion were classified as securities available-for-sale. As compared to December
31, 2008, the available for sale portfolio at June 30, 2009, reflected (i) an decrease of $59.6
million in obligations of U.S. government sponsored-enterprises and agencies; (ii) an increase of
$69.3 million in obligations of states and political subdivisions; (iii) a $12.9 million increase
in corporate and other bonds; and (iv) a $10.7 million decrease in mortgage-backed securities. Our
mortgage related securities are backed by GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC or are collateralized by securities
backed by these agencies.
31
Table 8 Composition of Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities (dollars in thousands): |
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 18,552 | $ | 487 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 19,005 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
726 | 16 | (1 | ) | 741 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities
held-to-maturity |
$ | 19,278 | $ | 503 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 19,746 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | 258,408 | $ | 11,982 | $ | | $ | 270,390 | ||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
443,777 | 8,191 | (2,714 | ) | 449,254 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
78,216 | 3,906 | (3 | ) | 82,119 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
429,230 | 14,204 | (176 | ) | 443,258 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,550 | 213 | | 5,763 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,215,181 | $ | 38,496 | $ | (2,893 | ) | $ | 1,250,784 | |||||||
June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Holding Gains | Holding Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 23,082 | $ | 720 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 23,789 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,140 | 16 | (3 | ) | 1,153 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities held-to-maturity |
$ | 24,222 | $ | 736 | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 24,942 | |||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and agencies |
$ | 302,781 | $ | 3,456 | $ | (1,959 | ) | $ | 304,278 | |||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
322,021 | 3,356 | (2,741 | ) | 322,636 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
43,143 | 436 | (70 | ) | 43,509 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
422,893 | 3,393 | (3,610 | ) | 422,676 | |||||||||||
Other securities |
5,699 | 87 | | 5,786 | ||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,096,537 | $ | 10,728 | $ | (8,380 | ) | $ | 1,098,885 | |||||||
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that were
classified as available-for-sale totaled $30.0 million and $15.6 million, respectively. Gross
realized gains from 2009 and 2008 securities sales totaled $498 thousand and $166 thousand,
respectively. There were no losses on securities sales during these periods. During the six-months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, sales of investment securities that were classified as
available-for-sale totaled $35.4 million and $69.6 million, respectively. Gross realized gains
from 2009 and 2008 securities sales were $747 thousand and $559 thousand, respectively. There were
no losses on securities sales during these periods. The specific identification method was used to
determine cost on computing the realized gains.
32
Table 9 Maturities and Yields of Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities Held at June
30, 2009 (in thousands, except percentages):
Maturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One Year | After Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Through | Through | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity: | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
$ | 10,070 | 7.47 | % | $ | 8,057 | 7.07 | % | $ | 165 | 5.94 | % | $ | 260 | 6.61 | % | $ | 18,552 | 7.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
117 | 6.16 | 277 | 4.55 | 322 | 4.26 | 10 | 5.24 | 726 | 4.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,187 | 7.46 | % | $ | 8,334 | 7.18 | % | $ | 487 | 4.83 | % | $ | 270 | 6.56 | % | $ | 19,278 | 7.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Maturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One Year | After Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Through | Through | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale: | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 30,946 | 4.49 | % | $ | 239,444 | 3.94 | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 270,390 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
22,621 | 6.34 | 120,129 | 5.80 | 187,525 | 6.15 | 118,979 | 6.12 | 449,254 | 6.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and other
securities |
27,989 | 3.66 | 51,375 | 5.39 | 8,518 | 7.49 | | | 87,882 | 4.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
35,136 | 5.09 | 321,776 | 4.98 | 86,183 | 4.82 | 163 | 5.89 | 443,258 | 4.96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 116,692 | 4.74 | % | $ | 732,724 | 4.74 | % | $ | 282,226 | 5.79 | % | $ | 119,142 | 6.12 | % | $ | 1,250,784 | 5.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Maturing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One Year | After Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Through | Through | After | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Available-for-Sale and | or Less | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held- to-Maturity Securities: | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 30,946 | 4.49 | % | $ | 239,444 | 3.94 | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 270,390 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
32,691 | 7.13 | 128,186 | 5.88 | 187,690 | 6.15 | 119,239 | 6.12 | 467,806 | 6.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and other
securities |
27,989 | 4.12 | 51,375 | 5.39 | 8,518 | 7.10 | | | 87,882 | 4.90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
35,253 | 4.80 | 322,053 | 4.98 | 86,505 | 4.96 | 173 | 5,50 | 443,984 | 4.96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 126,879 | 5.07 | % | $ | 741,058 | 4.77 | % | $ | 282,713 | 5.53 | % | $ | 119,412 | 5.92 | % | $ | 1,270,062 | 5.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
All yields are computed on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a marginal tax rate of 35%. Yields
on available-for-sale securities are based on amortized cost. Maturities of mortgage-backed
securities are based on contractual maturities and could differ due to prepayments of underlying
mortgages. Maturities of other securities are reported at the sooner of maturity date or call
date.
33
Table 10 Disclosure of Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Securities with Continuous
Unrealized Loss
The following tables disclose, as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, our available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity securities that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for less than
12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized-loss position for 12 or more months
(in thousands):
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
$ | 107,190 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 2,676 | $ | 185 | $ | 109,866 | $ | 2,748 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
30,809 | 176 | 43 | 1 | 30,852 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
4,994 | 3 | | | 4,994 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 142,993 | $ | 2,742 | $ | 2,719 | $ | 186 | $ | 145,712 | $ | 2,928 | ||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. government
sponsored-enterprises and
agencies |
$ | 118,167 | $ | 1,959 | $ | | $ | | $ | 118,167 | $ | 1,959 | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and
political subdivisions |
135,209 | 2,720 | 898 | 34 | 136,107 | 2,754 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
145,248 | 2,076 | 41,022 | 1,537 | 186,270 | 3,613 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
9,097 | 70 | | | 9,097 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 407,721 | $ | 6,825 | $ | 41,920 | $ | 1,571 | $ | 449,641 | $ | 8,396 | ||||||||||||
The number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totaled 299 at June 30,
2009. We do not believe these unrealized losses are other than temporary as (i) we do not have
the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) it is more likely than
not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. The unrealized
losses noted are interest rate related due to the level of interest rates at June 30, 2009. We
have reviewed the ratings of the issuers and have not identified any issues related to the ultimate
repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities. Our mortgage related
securities are backed by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC or are collateralized by securities backed by these
agencies.
The portfolio had an overall tax equivalent yield of 5.20% at June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, the
investment portfolio had a weighted average life of 4.41 years and modified duration of 3.77 years.
Deposits. Deposits held by subsidiary banks represent our primary source of funding. Total
deposits were $2.47 billion as of June 30, 2009, as compared to $2.57 billion as of June 30, 2008.
Table 11 provides a breakdown of average deposits and rates paid for the second quarters of 2009
and 2008 and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
34
Table 11 Composition of Average Deposits (in thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
$ | 753,473 | | % | $ | 740,688 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking |
592,393 | 0.33 | 573,002 | 0.88 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market
accounts |
432,981 | 0.43 | 432,710 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits under
$100,000 |
362,519 | 1.72 | 406,479 | 3.30 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits of
$100,000 or more |
347,747 | 1.90 | 344,929 | 3.55 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
1,735,640 | 0.96 | % | 1,757,120 | 1.94 | % | ||||||||||
Total average deposits |
$ | 2,489,113 | $ | 2,497,808 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||
Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
$ | 754,851 | | % | $ | 715,334 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking |
612,595 | 0.36 | 591,172 | 1.15 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market
accounts |
432,031 | 0.45 | 424,330 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits under
$100,000 |
366,458 | 1.86 | 412,360 | 3.61 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits of
$100,000 or more |
340,179 | 2.07 | 348,609 | 3.86 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
1,751,263 | 1.03 | % | 1,776,471 | 2.22 | % | ||||||||||
Total average deposits |
$ | 2,506,114 | $ | 2,491,805 | ||||||||||||
Short-Term Borrowings. Included in short-term borrowings were federal funds purchased and
securities sold under repurchase agreements of $176.7 million and $149.9 million at June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are generally with significant
customers that require short-term liquidity for their funds. The average balance of federal funds
purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements was $171.9 million and $156.8 million in
the second quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average rate paid on federal funds
purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements was 0.45% and 1.13% for the second
quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average balance of federal funds purchased and
securities sold under repurchase agreements was $201.4 million and $160.6 million in the six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average rate paid on federal funds
purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements was 0.45% and 1.59% for the six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
35
Capital Resources
We evaluate capital resources by our ability to maintain adequate regulatory capital ratios to do
business in the banking industry. Issues related to capital resources arise primarily when we are
growing at an accelerated rate but not retaining a significant amount of our profits or when we
experience significant asset quality deterioration.
Total shareholders equity was $388.9 million, or 12.64% of total assets, at June 30, 2009, as
compared to $343.9 million, or 11.15% of total assets, at June 30, 2008. During the second quarter
of 2009, total shareholders equity averaged $389.1 million, or 12.62% of average assets, as
compared to $351.9 million, or 11.61% of average assets, during the same period in 2008.
Banking regulators measure capital adequacy by means of the risk-based capital ratio and leverage
ratio. The risk-based capital rules provide for the weighting of assets and off-balance-sheet
commitments and contingencies according to prescribed risk categories ranging from 0% to 100%.
Regulatory capital is then divided by risk-weighted assets to determine the risk-adjusted capital
ratios. The leverage ratio is computed by dividing shareholders equity less intangible assets by
quarter-to-date average assets less intangible assets. Regulatory minimums for total risk-based
and leverage ratios are 8.00% and 3.00%, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, our total risk-based
and leverage capital ratios were 18.61% and 10.53%, respectively, as compared to total risk-based
and leverage capital ratios of 16.27% and 9.55% as of June 30, 2008. We believe by all
measurements our capital ratios remain well above regulatory minimums.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk results when the maturity or repricing intervals of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are different. Our exposure to interest
rate risk is managed primarily through our strategy of selecting the types and terms of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that generate favorable earnings while
limiting the potential negative effects of changes in market interest rates. We use no
off-balance-sheet financial instruments to manage interest rate risk.
Each of our subsidiary banks has an asset liability management committee that monitors interest
rate risk and compliance with investment policies; there is also a holding company-wide committee
that monitors the aggregate companys interest rate risk and compliance with investment policies.
The Company and each subsidiary bank utilize an earnings simulation model as the primary
quantitative tool in measuring the amount of interest rate risk associated with changing market
rates. The model quantifies the effects of various interest rate scenarios on projected net
interest income and net income over the next 12 months. The model measures the impact on net
interest income relative to a base case scenario of hypothetical fluctuations in interest rates
over the next 12 months. These simulations incorporate assumptions regarding balance sheet growth
and mix, pricing and the repricing and maturity characteristics of the existing and projected
balance sheet.
As of June 30, 2009, the model simulations projected that 100 and 200 basis point increases in
interest rates would result in positive variances in net interest income of 0.06% and 0.87%,
respectively, relative to the base case over the next 12 months, while decreases in interest rates
of 50 basis points would result in a positive variance in a net interest income of 0.14% relative
to the base case over the next 12 months. The likelihood of a decrease in interest rates beyond 50
basis points as of June 30, 2009 is considered remote given current interest rate levels. These are
good faith estimates and assume that the composition of our interest sensitive assets and
liabilities existing at each year-end will remain constant over the relevant twelve month
measurement period and that changes in market interest rates are instantaneous and sustained across
the yield curve regardless of duration of pricing characteristics of specific assets or
liabilities. Also, this analysis does not contemplate any actions that we might undertake in
response to changes in market interest rates. We believe these estimates are not
necessarily indicative of what
36
actually could occur in the event of immediate interest rate increases or decreases of this
magnitude. As interest-bearing assets and liabilities reprice in different time frames and
proportions to market interest rate movements, various assumptions must be made based on historical
relationships of these variables in reaching any conclusion. Since these correlations are based on
competitive and market conditions, we anticipate that our future results will likely be different
from the foregoing estimates, and such differences could be material.
Should we be unable to maintain a reasonable balance of maturities and repricing of our
interest-earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities, we could be required to dispose of
our assets in an unfavorable manner or pay a higher than market rate to fund our activities. Our
asset liability committees oversee and monitor this risk.
Liquidity
Liquidity is our ability to meet cash demands as they arise. Such needs can develop from loan
demand, deposit withdrawals or acquisition opportunities. Potential obligations resulting from the
issuance of standby letters of credit and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loan
customers are other factors affecting our liquidity needs. Many of these obligations and
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore the total commitment amounts
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements affecting our liquidity position. The
potential need for liquidity arising from these types of financial instruments is represented by
the contractual notional amount of the instrument. Asset liquidity is provided by cash and assets
which are readily marketable or which will mature in the near future. Liquid assets include cash,
federal funds sold, and short-term investments in time deposits in banks. Liquidity is also
provided by access to funding sources, which include core depositors and correspondent banks that
maintain accounts with and sell federal funds to our subsidiary banks. Other sources of funds
include our ability to borrow from short-term sources, such as purchasing federal funds from
correspondents and sales of securities under agreements to repurchase, which amounted to $176.7
million at June 30, 2009, and an unfunded $50.0 million line of credit established with a
nonaffiliated bank which matures on December 31, 2009. First Financial Bank, N. A., Abilene also
has federal funds purchased lines of credit with two non-affiliated banks totaling $60.0 million.
On December 19, 2008, we renewed our loan agreement, effective December 31, 2008, with The Frost
National Bank. Under the loan agreement, as renewed and amended, we are permitted to draw up to
$50.0 million on a revolving line of credit. Prior to December 31, 2009, interest is paid quarterly
at Wall Street Journal Prime and the line of credit matures December 31, 2009. If a balance exists
at December 31, 2009, the principal balance converts to a term facility payable quarterly over five
years and interest is paid quarterly at our election at Wall Street Journal Prime plus 50 basis
points or LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The line of credit is unsecured for an outstanding balance
less than or equal to $25.0 million and secured by the stock of a subsidiary bank should the
balance exceed $25.0 million. Among other provisions in the credit agreement, we must satisfy
certain financial covenants during the term of the loan agreement, including, without limitation,
covenants that require us to maintain certain capital, tangible net worth, loan loss reserve,
non-performing asset and cash flow coverage ratio. In addition, the credit agreement contains
certain operational covenants, that among others, restricts the payment of dividends above 55% of
consolidated net income, limits the incurrence of debt (excluding any amounts acquired in an
acquisition) and prohibits the disposal of assets except in the ordinary course of business.
Effective June 30, 2009, the loan agreement was amended to change the definition of net income to
add back the FDIC special assessment for 2009 as it relates to the calculation of return on equity,
return on assets and dividends. Since 1995, we have historically declared dividends as a percentage
of our consolidated net income in a range of 37% (low) in 1995 to 53% (high) in 2003 and 2006.
There was no outstanding balance under the line of credit as of June 30, 2009, or December 31,
2008.
37
Given the strong core deposit base, relatively low loan to deposit ratios maintained at our
subsidiary banks and dividend capacity of our subsidiary banks we consider our current liquidity
position to be adequate to meet our short- and long-term liquidity needs.
In addition, we anticipate that any future acquisition of financial institutions, expansion of
branch locations or offering of new products could also place a demand on our cash resources.
Available cash at our parent company, which totaled $32.5 million at June 30, 2009, investment
securities which totaled $10.5 million, available dividends from subsidiary banks which totaled
$41.1 million at June 30, 2009, utilization of available lines of credit, and future debt or equity
offerings are expected to be the source of funding for these potential acquisitions or expansions.
On July 1, 2009, our subsidiary banks paid an aggregate of $10.5 million in dividends to the parent
company related to second quarter earnings. Existing cash resources at our subsidiary banks may
also be used as a source of funding for these potential acquisitions or expansions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk
in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial
instruments include unfunded lines of credit, commitments to extend credit and federal funds sold
and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in our consolidated balance sheets.
Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial
instrument for unfunded lines of credit, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit
is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. We generally use the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance-sheet
instruments.
Unfunded lines of credit and commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as
long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. These commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a
fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each
customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, as we deem
necessary upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, and
equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issue to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially
the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The average collateral value
held on letters of credit usually exceeds the contract amount.
Table 12 Commitments as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
Total Notional | ||||
Amounts | ||||
Committed | ||||
Unfunded lines of credit |
$ | 256,620 | ||
Unfunded commitments to extend credit |
38,101 | |||
Standby letters of credit |
14,952 | |||
Total commercial commitments |
$ | 309,673 | ||
We believe we have no other off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions with
unconsolidated, special purpose entities that would expose us to liability that is not reflected on
the face of the financial statements.
38
Parent Company Funding. Our ability to fund various operating expenses, dividends, and cash
acquisitions is generally dependent on our own earnings (without giving effect to our
subsidiaries), cash reserves and funds derived from our subsidiary banks. These funds historically
have been produced by intercompany dividends and management fees that are limited to reimbursement
of actual expenses. We anticipate that our recurring cash sources will continue to include
dividends and management fees from our subsidiary banks. At June 30, 2009, approximately $41.4
million was available for the payment of intercompany dividends by the subsidiaries without the
prior approval of regulatory agencies.
Dividends. Our long-term dividend policy is to pay cash dividends to our shareholders of between
40% and 55% of net earnings while maintaining adequate capital to support growth. The cash
dividend payout ratios have amounted to 51.89%, and 51.26% of net earnings, respectively, for the
first half of 2009 and the same period in 2008. Given our current capital position and projected
earnings and asset growth rates, we do not anticipate any significant change in our current
dividend policy.
Each state bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System and each national banking
association is required by federal law to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board
and the OCC, respectively, to declare and pay dividends if the total of all dividends declared in
any calendar year would exceed the total of (1) such banks net profits (as defined and interpreted
by regulation) for that year plus (2) its retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by
regulation) for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus. In
addition, these banks may only pay dividends to the extent that retained net profits (including the
portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined by regulation).
To pay dividends, we and our subsidiary banks must maintain adequate capital above regulatory
guidelines. In addition, if the applicable regulatory authority believes that a bank under its
jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending
on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), the authority may
require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from the unsafe practice. The
Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and the OCC have each indicated that paying dividends that deplete
a banks capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The
Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC have issued policy statements that recommend that bank
holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends out of current operating
earnings.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management considers interest rate risk to be a significant market risk for the Company. See Item
2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
disclosure regarding this market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2009, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our management, which includes our principal
executive officer and our principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud.
39
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints; additionally, the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and
that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based, in part,
upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over
time, controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions; also the degree of compliance
with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded based on our
evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, that our disclosure controls and procedures,
as defined, under Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are effective at the
reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2009.
Subsequent to our evaluation, there were no significant changes in internal controls or other
factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these
internal controls.
40
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On April 28, 2009, the annual meeting of shareholders was held in Abilene, Texas. The following
directors were elected at this meeting and the respective number of votes cast for and withheld is
as follows:
Votes | Votes | |||||||
Director | For | Withheld | ||||||
Tucker Bridwell |
18,078,665 | 44,322 | ||||||
Joseph E. Canon |
18,076,750 | 46,237 | ||||||
Mac A. Coalson |
17,940,010 | 182,977 | ||||||
David Copeland |
18,077,937 | 45,050 | ||||||
F. Scott Dueser |
18,035,370 | 87,617 | ||||||
Murray Edwards |
18,104,738 | 18,249 | ||||||
Ron Giddiens |
18,102,139 | 20,848 | ||||||
Derrell E. Johnson |
18,104,421 | 18,566 | ||||||
Kade L. Matthews |
18,080,401 | 42,586 | ||||||
Kenneth T. Murphy |
16,029,339 | 2,093,648 | ||||||
Dian Graves Stai |
18,078,986 | 44,001 | ||||||
Johnny E. Trotter |
18,104,538 | 18,449 |
There were no votes against, abstentions or broker non-votes.
In addition, the shareholders voted to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009 by a
vote of 18,084,782 for, 4,153 against and 34,052 abstained.
41
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
3.1
|
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2006). | ||
3.2
|
| Amended and Restated Bylaws, and all amendments thereto, of the Registrant (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the ended December 31, 2008). | ||
4.1
|
| Specimen certificate of First Financial Common Stock (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3 of the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-A filed on Form 8-A/A No. 1 on January 7, 1994). | ||
10.1
|
| Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated October 28, 1992, between the Registrant and Kenneth T. Murphy (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002). | ||
10.2
|
| Revised Deferred Compensation Agreement, dated December 28, 1995, between the Registrant and Kenneth T. Murphy (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002). | ||
10.3
|
| Executive Recognition Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K Report filed July 3, 2006). | ||
10.4
|
| 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998). | ||
10.5
|
| 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Appendix A of the Registrants Schedule 14a Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders). | ||
10.6
|
| Loan agreement dated December 31, 2004, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 31, 2004). | ||
10.7
|
| First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 28, 2005, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 28, 2005). | ||
10.8
|
| Second Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 31, 2006, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 31, 2006). | ||
10.9
|
| Third Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 31, 2007). | ||
10.10
|
| Fourth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated July 24, 2008, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrants Form 10-Q filed July 25, 2008). | ||
10.11
|
| Fifth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 22, 2008). | ||
10.12
|
| Sixth Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated June 16, 2009, signed June 30, 2009, between First Financial Bankshares, Inc. and The Frost National Bank (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2009). | ||
*31.1
|
| Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. | ||
*31.2
|
| Rule 13a-14(a) / 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. | ||
*32.1
|
| Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. | ||
*32.2
|
| Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. |
* | Filed herewith |
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES, INC. |
||||
Date: July 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ F. Scott Dueser | ||
F. Scott Dueser | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: July 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ J. Bruce Hildebrand | ||
J. Bruce Hildebrand | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||||
43