FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
|
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
____________________
|
FORM
10-Q
|
____________________
|
(Mark
One)
|
x
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
|
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
|
o
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
|
of
the Securities Exchange Act
|
For
the transition period from N/A
to
N/A
|
____________________
|
Commission
File No. 333-137170
|
____________________
|
Bond
Laboratories, Inc.
|
(Name
of small business issuer as specified in its
charter)
|
Nevada
|
20-3464383
|
State
of Incorporation
|
IRS
Employer Identification No.
|
777
South Highway 101, Suite 215, Solana Beach, CA 92975
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(858)
847-9000
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common
Stock, $0.001 par value per share
(Title
of Class)
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days: Yes
x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer ¨ Non-Accelerated
filer ¨ Small
Business Issuer x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes ྑ No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Outstanding
at May 15, 2008
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value
|
20,179,950
|
BOND
LABORATORIES, INC.
INDEX
TO FORM 10-Q FILING
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATIONPAGE
|
|
|
|
Page
Numbers
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Item 1.
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
5
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
6
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
8
|
Item 2.
|
|
Management
Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
13
|
Item 3
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
14
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
14
|
|
|
|||
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Item 1.
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
15
|
Item 1A
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
15
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
17
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
|
17
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
17
|
Item 5
|
|
Other
information
|
|
17
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
17
|
CERTIFICATIONS
Exhibit
31 - Management certification……………………………………………………... 19-22
Exhibit
32 - Sarbanes-Oxley Act……………………………………………………………..23-24
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|||||
ASSETS:
|
|
||||||
March
31, 2008
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$
|
8,094
|
$
|
590,197
|
|||
Accounts
receivables - net
|
123,981
|
4,532
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
467,528
|
624,527
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
599,603
|
1,219,256
|
|||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, net
|
84,979
|
92,977
|
|||||
Deposits
|
2,727
|
2,727
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
687,310
|
$
|
1,314,960
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
30,000
|
$
|
30,000
|
|||
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
630
|
253
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
30,630
|
30,253
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
30,630
|
30,253
|
|||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|||||||
5,000,000
issued and outstanding
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|||||||
20,179,950
and 20,231,450 issued and outstanding
|
|||||||
as
of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
201,799
|
202,314
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
6,258,273
|
5,809,008
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(5,853,392
|
)
|
(4,776,615
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
656,680
|
1,284,707
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$
|
687,310
|
$
|
1,314,960
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
BOND
LABORATORIES, INC.
|
|||||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
|||||||
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AND 2007
|
|||||||
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|||
Revenue
|
$
|
226,717
|
$
|
473
|
|||
Total
|
226,717
|
473
|
|||||
Cost
of Goods Sold
|
149,836
|
353
|
|||||
Gross
Profits
|
76,881
|
120
|
|||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
393,936
|
165,760
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
676,298
|
11,203
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
9,172
|
4,352
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
80,774
|
-
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
1,160,181
|
181,315
|
|||||
OPERATING
LOSS
|
(1,083,300
|
)
|
(181,195
|
)
|
|||
OTHER
(INCOME) AND EXPENSES
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
-
|
42,631
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
(2,022
|
)
|
(1,613
|
)
|
|||
Rental
income
|
(4,500
|
)
|
- | ||||
Total
other expense
|
(6,522
|
)
|
41,018
|
||||
|
|||||||
INCOME
TAX (BENEFIT) PROVISION
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
NET
LOSS
|
$
|
(1,076,779
|
)
|
$
|
(222,213
|
)
|
|
NET
LOSS PER SHARE:
|
|||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
20,199,587
|
6,828,600
|
|||||
Loss
per share - basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
BOND
LABORATORIES, INC.
|
|||||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|||||||
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AND 2007
|
|||||||
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
||||
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|||
Net
(loss)
|
$
|
(1,076,779
|
)
|
$
|
(222,213
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash (used
in) operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
9,172
|
4,352
|
|||||
Stock
issued for compensation
|
60,750
|
-
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
377
|
15,000
|
|||||
Accounts
receivables
|
157,000
|
-
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(119,449
|
)
|
12,591
|
||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(968,928
|
)
|
(190,270
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of Intangible Asset
|
(1,175
|
)
|
(83,569
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,175
|
)
|
(83,569
|
)
|
|||
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of Common Stock
|
388,000
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from convertible notes payables
|
-
|
335,000
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
388,000
|
335,000
|
|||||
INCREASE
IN CASH
|
(582,103
|
)
|
61,161
|
||||
CASH,
BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
590,197
|
60,753
|
|||||
CASH,
END OF YEAR
|
$
|
8,094
|
$
|
121,914
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities
|
|||||||
Issuance
of company stock for interest
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
24,313
|
|||
Conversion
of debt into company's common shares
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
815,000
|
|||
Issuance
of company stock for compensation
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
230,000
|
|||
Issuance
of company stock for notes payable affiliates
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
119,606
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
5
BOND
LABORATORIES, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 and 2007
NOTE
1 -
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Bond
Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on
July 26, 2005. The Company has its wholly owned subsidiary Got Fusion, Inc.
that
was incorporated in August of 2007 and was operating in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The Company has started research and development of energy
drinks and has implemented their business plan which has generated income.
The
Company has not begun the process of operating this business and is still in
the
process of researching the best formula for market production on some of its
products. Utilizing a state of the art, alternative delivery method vs.
antiquated capsules and pills, Bond Laboratories is building a turn-key
Nutraceutical Dietary Supplement business catering to all five of the
distribution segments with focus on the three major categories of the industry;
Energy, Pain Relief and Weight loss. Bond Laboratories, Inc. now trades under
the symbol BNLB.OB on the OTC:BB market.
NOTE
2 -
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Interim
Financial Statements
The
accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article
8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information
and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008
are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in our Form 10-KSB Report for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
NOTE
3 -
GOING CONCERN ISSUES
The
accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared
in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.
However, the Company has year end losses from operations and had minimal
revenues from operations the three months ended March 31, 2008. During three
months ended March 31, 2008, the Company incurred an accumulated net loss of
$1,076,779 and has an accumulated deficit of $5,853,392 from inception. Further,
the Company has inadequate working capital to maintain or develop its
operations, and is dependent upon funds from private investors and the support
of certain stockholders.
These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue
as
a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. In this regard, Management
is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and
additional sales of its common stock. There is no assurance that the Company
will be successful in raising additional capital.
6
NOTE
4 - RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS
Disclosure
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosure
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,”
an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (SFAS 161). This statement requires that
objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying
risk and accounting designation. The Company is required to adopt SFAS 161
on
January 1, 2009.
The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 161 on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Determination
of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
In
April
2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets,”, which amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life
of
intangible assets under FASB 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period
of
the expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB
141 (revised 2007) “Business Combinations” and other U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact of FSP FAS 142-3 on its consolidated financial
statements.
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities
In
February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value
at
specified election dates. This Statement applies to all entities, including
not-for-profit organizations. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of
an
entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. As such,
the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
5 -
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The
Company is managed by its key shareholder who is also an officer and director.
This shareholder is a sole shareholder of Small World Traders. Small
World Traders had an outstanding debt of $119,606 and converted this outstanding
debt into 200,000 shares of the Company.
NOTE
6 -
NET LOSS PER SHARE
Restricted
shares and warrants are not included in the computation of the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the periods. There are no restricted shares
or warrants issued in the capital of the Company. The net loss per common share
is calculated by dividing the consolidated loss by the weighted average number
of shares outstanding during the periods.
7
NOTE
7 -
EQUITY
During
Nine months ended March 31, 2008 and 2006:
Quarter
Ended
|
Stock
issued
|
Cash
Received
|
Stock
for
|
Stock
issued for
|
|||||||||
for
Cash
|
Conversion
of
|
Services
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Debt
|
|
||||||||||
March
31, 2007
|
-
|
-
|
1,878,600
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
Issued
|
-
|
-
|
1,878,600
|
-
|
|||||||||
March
31, 2008
|
388,000
|
388,000
|
-
|
439,500
|
|||||||||
Total
Issued
|
388,000
|
388,000
|
-
|
439,500
|
During
the period ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 1,238,600 shares of its
common stock for the conversion of debt in the amount of $815,000 plus accrued
interest of $24,313 with the total conversion of $839,313. The Company issued
230,000 common shares for the conversion of debt from the accrued salary of
the
Company’s CEO of $230,000. Also, the Company issued 200,000 common shares for
the conversion of affiliate debt of $119,606. The Company agreed to convert
all
remaining debt of the Company to solidify the financial presentation. The
Company did not receive proceeds from this conversion of debt. The Company
converted debt from prior periods which this conversion is a non-cash
transaction as reflected in the statement of Cash Flow.
During
the period ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 388,000 shares of its common
stock for $388,000. The Company has issued 308,000 shares of its common stock
as
consideration to consultants for the fair value of the services rendered. The
value of those shares is determined based on the trading value of the stock
at
the dates on which the agreements were entered into for the services and the
value of service rendered. During the period ended March 31, 2008, the Company
cancelled 747,500 shares of common stock valued at par value since the stock
did
not have a trading symbol. The value of these shares issued were expensed in
the
period incurred.
There
were no options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
ITEM
2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis contains various “forward looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company
that
involve risks and uncertainties. Certain statements included in this Form
10-QSB, including, without limitation, statements related to anticipated cash
flow sources and uses, and words including but not limited to “anticipates”,
“believes”, “plans”, “expects”, “future” and similar statements or expressions,
identify forward looking statements. Any forward-looking statements herein
are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties in the Company’s business, including
but not limited to, reliance on key customers and competition in its markets,
market demand, product performance, technological developments, maintenance
of
relationships with key suppliers, difficulties of hiring or retaining key
personnel and any changes in current accounting rules, all of which may be
beyond the control of the Company. The Company adopted at management’s
discretion, the most conservative recognition of revenue based on the most
astringent guidelines of the SEC in terms of recognition of recurring revenue.
Management will elect additional changes to revenue recognition to comply with
the most conservative SEC recognition on a forward going accrual basis as the
model is replicated with other similar markets (i.e. SBDC). The Company’s actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth therein.
8
Forward-looking
statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause
our
actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors and
risks
that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially
differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those
identified in the section titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as well as other factors
that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but that may exist in
the
future.
In
addition, the foregoing factors may affect generally our business, results
of
operations and financial position. Forward-looking statements speak only as
of
the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline
any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
As
people
live longer and healthcare costs continue to rise at substantial multiples
to
the cost of living, consumers are recognizing that prevention is far more
economical than prescription cures. Capitalizing on this trend, Bond
Laboratories brought together a seasoned team with a solid track record of
converting ideas into highly profitable, consumption-driven products and being
on the leading edge of innovation. Bond Laboratories
is now pursuing its unique vision for the next generation of preventative health
products; Healthy Beverages and Foods.
Health:
There is
a growing recognition that physical and mental wellbeing matter. The report
by
Datamonitor (DTM.L), London, U.K. discloses statistics that show that an
overwhelming majority of European and U.S. consumers feel that improving their
health is important. Even more significant is that 64% of Europeans and U.S.
consumers actually took "steps" to improve their health during 2003-04.
Datamonitor also identifies the crossover trend of health and convenience
(health on-the-go) as an under-targeted opportunity with high growth potential.
Convenience:
The
demand for easier, faster and disposable products. Convenience, time saving
products, and “quick fixes” are important to 82% of European and U.S. consumers.
Convenience is also impacting personal care consumption; 57% of European and
U.S. consumers report that they groom while on-the-move and 58% admit to
grooming at-work. Bond Laboratories is ideally positioned to leverage the
opportunity of providing products to this broad consumer base.
Bond
Laboratories is set up to cater to all five of the major distribution channels;
focusing on the three most profitable categories of the industry- Energy, Pain
Relief and Weight loss. Based upon our extensive research, we strongly believe
that our liquid energy product would make for an extremely successful initial
product offering to the public markets.
In
November, 2007 Bond Laboratories introduced the Fusion.6+ hr. 2 oz. energy
shot
at the NACS show in Atlanta, Ga. Management believes the public’s initial
reaction to Fusion has been incredible. The Company
has started to receive orders from some of the largest C-store chains,
drug store chains, sporting goods stores, and health clubs in the nation. In
addition, Management has prior relationships with some the nation’s biggest
distributors. Management anticipates these realtionships should provide
Fusion incredible exposure to every type of consumer that is looking for energy
that is: easy to consume, won’t leave you feeling bloated, provides instant
energy and will not leave you with a crash after drinking it.
9
Initial
Target Market: Energy
Product:
Fusion
The
significance of being one of the first brands to market cannot be overlooked.
Energy Drinks began their popularity with products like Red Bull in the late
1980’s. Although there are over 600 energy drinks on the market today, it is
estimated that Red Bull sold over 5 Billion units in 2007. The concentrated
2
ounce energy shot drink began approximately 3 years ago with about 30
brands
in the category today; the first, ‘5 Hour Energy’ is expected to have had sales
of well in excess of $100 million for 2007. Bond launched its Fusion Energy
Shot
at the National Association of Convenience Stores in November of 2007 where
it
was voted Best Taste.
Fusion
Product Features:
•
|
3X
the kick of the typical canned energy drink in a small 2oz.
shot!
|
•
|
Metabolizes
faster than canned energy drink
|
•
|
Zero
carbs, Zero grams of sugar, only 8 calories per serving
|
•
|
No
crash- as associated with all sugar based energy drinks
|
•
|
The
strongest / longest lasting energy shot available on the
market
|
•
|
Recently
voted the #1 tasting energy shot in the category at the 2007 NACS
Show!
|
•
|
Available
in Berry flavor now, with Limon flavor launching in May
2008
|
Competition
Bond
Laboratories will encounter competition in each market that they enter. Patent
and Trademark applications that cover new embodiments of technology will be
pursued wherever possible. While the Company cannot assure that the patents
and
applications will block competitive products, they should help the Company
become a significant participant in the marketplace.
The
industry leader is Red Bull with annual sales of approximately $5 billion.
The
other leaders in the category include Monster, (manufactured and distributed
by
Hanson Beverages), RockStar, (now distributed by Coca Cola along with its own
brand ‘Full Throttle’), Amp, (manufactured and distributed by Pepsi) and SoBe,
(also manufactured and distributed by Pepsi). To managements’ knowledge and
observation, almost all energy products are sold in 8 - 24 ounce cans. As of
the
end of 2007, there were more than 600 brands in the energy can drink business,
with close to 200 going out of business that year and 200 new entries to take
their place. Fusion is sold in a 2 ounce shot with the same ‘kick’ as a 24 ounce
energy drink. This gives ‘Fusion’ a major advantage that is stressed to the
consumers in all marketing materials. Not only is it easier to carry around
a
small bottle, vs. several cans, (which must stay cold), but cans use science
and
technology from over ten years ago. Where the energy can market is dominated
by
major brands with sales exceeding $500 mm - $5 billion, the shot market only
has
approximately 15 brands, of which only one, 5 Hour Energy has sales exceeding
$100 mm. Since 1995, there have been great discoveries in energy producing
nutrients. More important, studies have clearly demonstrated that most
ingredients are not stable in normal carbonated beverage products and that
the
longer they stay in contact with liquid, the less potent they become.
10
Distribution
Plan
Key
Relationships: WMG
In
November of 2007, Bond Laboratories entered into a consulting and marketing
agreement with Wasserman Media Group to formulate and implement a product
design/promotion/sponsorship/media plan for the Fusion line of Energy Products.
Fusion
will reach out to America’s youth subcultures through an aggressive media and
events marketing plan targeted at action sports through a strategic partnership
with Wasserman Media Group (WMG)
WMG
Strengths:
•
|
SPONSORSHIPS
-
WMG represents some of the most talented athletes across baseball,
basketball, BMX, motocross, skateboarding, snowboarding, soccer and
surfing. Several of WMG’s athletes were the first to endorse Monster
Energy Drinks and largely acknowledged for helping to build it into
a $850
million brand.
|
•
|
MARKETING
-
WMG secures naming rights for popular sports and entertainment
destinations, generates corporate sponsorships, and develops marketing
programs for leading consumer brands.
|
•
|
CONTENT
-
WMG also develops, markets and distributes leading-edge sports and
entertainment content via all forms of media including television,
retail
and online platforms as well as live events.
|
Future
Bond Labs, quality of life products, are currently being finalized.
Partners
vs. Representation
Most
new
companies conceive an idea, test market and then seek out a distributor or
attempt to get retail space directly. This means that the brokers who will
represent and support the new product through the distribution channels are
not
directly involved in the development of the product or emotionally invested
in
the lifecycle of the product. By contrast, Bond Laboratories
is partnering in advance with well established brokers in each of the
five major areas of distribution, not only contracting for their services at
market rates, but incentivizing them with equity in the company that they can
vest into over the course of the success of each products life. Too often,
the
product representative opens the difficult door for a new product/company,
only
to watch them grow substantially, but not getting the opportunity to participate
in the increased overall value of the ‘brand’, due to their initial and ongoing
efforts. Management believes that as initial shareholders in the Company, these
distributors will keep its products at the top of their priority list and take
every effort to make sure that new ideas and concepts are being considered
by
Bond Laboratories
before anyone else.
Revenues
Revenue
from product sales is recognized upon shipment to customers at which time such
customers are invoiced. Units are shipped under the terms of FOB shipping point
when determination is made that collectibility is probable. Revenues for
services are recognized upon completion of the services. For consulting services
and other fee-for-service arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion
of
the services. The Company has adopted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, which provides guidance on the
recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial
statements.
11
Additional
Information
Bond
Laboratories
files reports and other materials with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These documents may be inspected and copied at the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, and
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can
also
get copies of documents that the Company files with the Commission through
the
Commission’s Internet site at www.sec.gov.
Results
of Operations
For
the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 we generated $226,717 and $473 for the
three months ended respectively.
Our future revenue plan is dependent on our ability to effectively introduce
our
products to our target consumers, generate sales, and obtain contract
manufacturing opportunities.
General
and Administrative were $393,936 and $165,760 for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in general and administrative
expenses relates to employing full time employees and officers during 2007
and
2008, and relates to increased costs of being a public reporting company,
including costs associated with our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission which matches with our overall business plan, and increase in the
use
of consulting firms.
Sales
and
Marketing was $676,298 and $11,203 for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and
2007 respectively. The increase in sales and marketing services relates to
costs
associated with hiring investor relations firms, marketing firms, advertising
firms, company sponsors, and stock related services also increased travel to
promote the sales of our products.
Depreciation
and amortization was $9,172 and $4,352 for the three months ended March 31,
2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in depreciation and amortization relates
to
the purchase of new equipment to prepare our product associated with our
marketing plan.
Research
and development was $80,774 and $0.00 for the three months ended March 31,
2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in research and development relates to
increase in our business model to develop and product our products for
consumption and sales to the general public for increase healthiness and energy.
The
Company incurred losses of approximately $1,076,779, and $222,213 for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our losses since our
inception through March 31, 2008 amount to $5,853,392. The increase in the
loss
reflects our investment in product development, packaging, contract
manufacturing,and marketing.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company has maintained a minimum of three months of working capital in the
bank
since September of 2005. This reserve was intended to allow for an adequate
amount of time to secure additional funds from investors as needed. To date,
the
Company has succeeded in securing capital as needed, but there is no guarantee
this will continue. Our monthly cash requirement amount is approximately
$125,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company sold 388,000
common shares for $388,000. Because the Company continues to rely upon private
investors for additional capital to grow the business, it can not and will
not
accept trade credit from any vendors. All significant purchases are pre-paid
or
a 50% deposit is made with the balance available in the bank
account.
The
Company's operating activities used $968,928 and $190,270 in the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively. The difference is mainly
attributable to the increase in operating expenses in the current year.
Cash
used
by investing activities was $1,175 and $83,569 for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease is due to a decrease in purchase
of equipment to develop our products.
12
Cash
provided by financing activities was $388,000 and $335,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase is due to an increase
in raising funds from our shareholders to develop our products for sale in
the
market.
We
believe we will have to rely on public and private equity to fund our liquidity
requirements over the intermediate term. We may be unable to obtain any
additional financings on terms favorable to us, or obtain additional funding
at
all. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, and if cash and
cash equivalents together with any income generated from operations fall short
of our liquidity requirements, we may be unable to sustain operations. Continued
negative cash flows could create substantial doubt regarding our ability to
fully implement our business plan and could render us unable to expand our
operations, successfully promote our brand, develop our products, respond to
competitive pressures, or take advantage of acquisition opportunities, any
of
which may have a material adverse effect on our business. If we raise additional
funds through the issuance of equity securities, our stockholders may experience
dilution of their ownership interest, and the newly issued securities may have
rights superior to those of our common stock. If we raise additional funds
by
issuing debt, we may be subject to limitations on our operations, including
limitations on the payments of dividends.
In
the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 our convertible debt holders converted their
debt to equity. Specifically,
they converted $839,313 of convertible debt to 1,238,600 common shares.
Our President converted his
accrued salary of $230,000 to 230,000 common shares. Small World Traders had
an
outstanding debt of $119,606 and converted the outstanding debt to 200,000
common shares of the Cmpany. The conversion of this debt was a non cash
transaction.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation
of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our
management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management
bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions
or
conditions.
Stock
Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued a revision of SFAS No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123(R)")
that requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions
to
be recognized in the statement of operations. With limited exceptions, the
amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value
of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards
will be re-measured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized
over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award.
SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123 and is effective as of the beginning
of
January 1, 2006. Based on the number of shares and awards outstanding as of
December 31, 2005 (and without giving effect to any awards which may be granted
in 2006), we do not expect our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in January 2006
to
have a material impact on the financial statements.
FSP
FAS
123(R)-5 was issued on October 10, 2006. The FSP provides that instruments
that
were originally issued as employee compensation and then modified, and that
modification is made to the terms of the instrument solely to reflect an equity
restructuring that occurs when the holders are no longer employees, then no
change in the recognition or the measurement (due to a change in classification)
of those instruments will result if both of the following conditions are met:
(a). There is no increase in fair value of the award (or the ratio of intrinsic
value to the exercise price of the award is preserved, that is, the holder
is
made whole), or the antidilution provision is not added to the terms of the
award in contemplation of an equity restructuring; and (b). All holders of
the
same class of equity instruments (for example, stock options) are treated in
the
same manner. The provisions in this FSP shall be applied in the first reporting
period beginning after the date the FSP is posted to the FASB website. The
Company has adopted SP FAS 123(R)-5 but it did not have a material impact on
its
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
13
Accounting
Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management
to
make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Our
management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management
bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions
or
conditions.
As
such,
in accordance with the use of accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, our actual realized results may differ from
management’s initial estimates as reported. A summary of significant accounting
policies are detailed in notes to the financial statements which are an integral
component of this filing.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
from product sales is recognized upon shipment to customers at which time such
customers are invoiced. Units are shipped under the terms of FOB shipping point
when determination is made that collectibility is probable. Revenues for
services are recognized upon completion of the services. For consulting services
and other fee-for-service arrangements, revenue is recognized upon completion
of
the services. The Company has adopted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, which provides guidance on the
recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial
statements.
We
do not
hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in any hedging activities.
Most of our activity is the sale of our nutricutical products.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our
management, with the participation of our President, evaluated the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by
this report. Based on that evaluation, our President concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by
us
in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our President, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance,
however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
14
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to
be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives. Furthermore, smaller reporting companies face additional
limitations. Smaller reporting companies employ fewer individuals and find
it difficult to properly segregate duties. Often, one or two individuals
control every aspect of the Company’s operation and are in a position to
override any system of internal control. Additionally, smaller reporting
companies tend to utilize general accounting software packages that lack a
rigorous set of software controls.
Our
management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer, evaluated
the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
March 31, 2008. In making this assessment, our management used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based
on this evaluation, our management, with the participation of the President,
concluded that, as of March 31, 2008, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
(b)
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently
completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We
are
currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is
no
action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court,
public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending
or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our
subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock,
any
of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries' officers or
directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have
a
material adverse effect.
ITEM 1A
-
Risk Factors
We
have
updated the risk factors previously disclosed in our registration statement
on
Form SB-2, filed November 22, 2006(the “Form SB-2”) and in our Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, which was filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2008 (the “Fiscal 2007 10-KSB”).
We believe there are no changes that constitute material changes from the risk
factors previously disclosed in the Fiscal 2007 10-K and the Form SB-2 except
as
disclosed below.
15
Our
Common Stock Is Subject To Penny Stock Regulation
Our
shares are subject to the provisions of Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), commonly
referred to as the "penny stock" rule. Section 15(g) sets forth certain
requirements for transactions in penny stocks and Rule 15g-9(d)(1) incorporates
the definition of penny stock as that used in Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act.
The Commission generally defines penny stock to be any equity security that
has
a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Rule
3a51-1
provides that any equity security is considered to be penny stock unless that
security is: registered and traded on a national securities exchange meeting
specified criteria set by the Commission; authorized for quotation on the NASDAQ
Stock Market; issued by a registered investment company; excluded from the
definition on the basis of price (at least $5.00 per share) or the registrant's
net tangible assets; or exempted from the definition by the Commission. Since
our shares are deemed to be "penny stock", trading in the shares
will be subject to additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers
who
sell penny stock to persons other than established customers and accredited
investors.
The
Liquidity Of Our Common Stock Is Seriously Limited And There Is A Limited Market
For Our Common Stock
Our
stock
is currently being traded on the NASDAQ Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, and
the
liquidity of our common stock is limited. The Bulletin Board is a limited market
and subject to substantial restrictions and limitations in comparison to the
NASDAQ system. Any broker/dealer that makes a market in our stock or other
person that buys or sells our stock could have a significant influence over
its
price at any given time.
II.
Risks Associated with Our Current Stage of Business
We
Depend Upon Key Management Personnel and the Loss of Any of Them Would Seriously
Disrupt Our Operations:
The
success of our company is largely dependent on the personal efforts of Scott
Landow and other key executives. The loss of the services of Scott Landow or
other key executives would have a material adverse effect on our business and
prospects. In addition, in order for us to undertake our operations as
contemplated, it will be necessary for us to locate and hire experienced
personnel who are knowledgeable in the Nutraceutical Dietary Supplement
business.
Our
failure to attract and retain such experienced personnel on acceptable terms
will have a material adverse impact on our ability to grow our
business.
The
nutritional supplements industry is intensely competitive. We have many
well-established competitors with substantially greater financial and other
resources than it. These factors may make it more difficult for us to
successfully implement its business plan and may adversely affect its results
of
operations.
The
nutritional supplements industry is a large, highly fragmented and growing
industry, with, to management’s knowledge, no single industry participant
accounting for more than 10% of total industry retail sales. Participants
include specialty retailers, supermarkets, drugstores, mass merchants
(wholesalers), multi-level marketing organizations, mail order companies and
a
variety of other smaller participants. The market is also highly sensitive
to
the introduction of new products, including various prescription drugs, which
may rapidly capture a significant share of the market. Increased competition
from companies that distribute through retail or wholesale channels could have
a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We
are a development stage business and the only revenues we have received from
product sales since inception were nominal. Accordingly, we have not been
operational long enough to experience any of the above problems. However, since
we are a development stage business, most, if not all companies in our industry
have greater financial and other resources available to them and possess
manufacturing, distribution and marketing capabilities greater than ours. In
addition, our competitors may be more effective and efficient in integrating
new
products. We may not be able to compete effectively and any of the factors
listed above may cause price reductions, reduced margins and difficulties in
gaining market share.
16
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
SECURITIES
During
the period ended March
31,
2008, the Company issued 388,000 shares of its common stock for $388,000 The
offer and sale of such shares of our common stock were effected in reliance
on
the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as
set
forth in Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and in Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed
to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of
Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act and had such background,
education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to
evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there
was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering;
(c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all
other information requested with respect to our company; (d) the investors
acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities”
for purposes of the Securities Act, and agreed to transfer such securities
only
in a transaction registered under the Securities Act or exempt from registration
under the Securities Act; and (e) a legend was placed on the certificates
representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only
be
transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act or transferred
in
a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act.
The
Company has issued 308,000
shares of its common stock as consideration to consultants for services rendered
and cancelled 747,500 shares.
The issuance of such shares of our common stock were effected in reliance on
the
exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set
forth
in Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act and in Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act. A legend was placed on the certificates representing each such
security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if
subsequent registered under the Securities Act or transferred in a transaction
exempt from registration under the Securities Act.
There
were no additional changes in securities and small business issuer purchase
of
equity securities during the period ended March 31, 2008.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
There
were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended March 31,
2008.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
There
were no matters submitted to the vote of securities holders during the period
ended March 31, 2008.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
There
is
no information with respect to which information is not otherwise called for
by
this form.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
|
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant
Date:
May 15, 2008
|
|
Bond
Laboratories, Inc.
By:
/s/ Scott Landow
|
|
|
Scott
Landow
|
|
|
Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial
Officer)
|
18