FLOWERS FOODS INC - Quarter Report: 2011 April (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 23, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________ to ___________
Commission file number 1-16247
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
GEORGIA | 58-2582379 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1919 FLOWERS CIRCLE, THOMASVILLE, GEORGIA
(Address of principal executive offices)
31757
(Zip Code)
229/226-9110
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o
No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
TITLE OF EACH CLASS | OUTSTANDING AT MAY 13, 2011 | |
Common Stock, $.01 par value | 90,248,792 |
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
INDEX
PAGE | ||||||||
NUMBER | ||||||||
PART I. Financial Information |
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited) |
||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
EX-21 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-31.3 | ||||||||
EX-32 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
1
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this filing and certain other written or oral statements made from
time to time by the company and its representatives that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements relate to current expectations regarding our future financial condition
and results of operations and are often identified by the use of words and phrases such as
anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan,
predict, project, should, will, would, is likely to, is expected to or will
continue, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking
statements are based upon assumptions we believe are reasonable.
Forward-looking statements are based on current information and are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected.
Certain factors that may cause actual results, performance, and achievements to differ materially
from those projected are discussed in this report and may include, but are not limited to:
| unexpected changes in any of the following: (i) general economic and business conditions; (ii) the competitive setting in which we operate, including, advertising or promotional strategies by us or our competitors, as well as changes in consumer demand; (iii) interest rates and other terms available to us on our borrowings; (iv) energy and raw materials costs and availability and hedging counter-party risks; (v) relationships with our employees, independent distributors and third party service providers; and (vi) laws and regulations (including environmental and health-related issues), accounting standards or tax rates in the markets in which we operate; |
| the loss or financial instability of any significant customer(s); |
| our ability to execute our business strategy, which may involve integration of recent acquisitions or the acquisition or disposition of assets at presently targeted values; |
| our ability to operate existing, and any new, manufacturing lines according to schedule; |
| the level of success we achieve in developing and introducing new products and entering new markets; |
| changes in consumer behavior, trends and preferences, including health and whole grain trends, and the movement toward more inexpensive store-branded products; |
| our ability to implement new technology as required; |
| the credit and business risks associated with our independent distributors and customers which operate in the highly competitive retail food and foodservice industries, including the amount of consolidation in these industries; |
| changes in pricing, customer and consumer reaction to pricing actions, and the pricing environment among competitors within the industry; |
| consolidation within the baking industry; |
| any business disruptions due to political instability, armed hostilities, incidents of terrorism, natural disasters or the responses to or repercussions from any of these or similar events or conditions and our ability to insure against such events; and |
| regulation and legislation related to climate change that could affect our ability to procure our commodity needs or that necessitate additional unplanned capital expenditures. |
The foregoing list of important factors does not include all such factors, nor necessarily
present them in order of importance. In addition, you should consult other disclosures made by the
company (such as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or in
company press releases) for other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from
those projected by the company. Please refer to Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors, of the companys
Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2011 and Part II, Item 1A., Risk Factors, of this Form 10-Q for
additional information regarding factors that could affect the companys results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity.
We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, as they speak only
as of the date made and are inherently uncertain. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly
revise or update such statements, except as required by law. You are advised, however, to consult
any further public disclosures by the company (such as in our filings with the SEC or in company
press releases) on related subjects.
2
Table of Contents
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
APRIL 23, 2011 | JANUARY 1, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 8,667 | $ | 6,755 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances of $535 and $522, respectively |
176,776 | 166,281 | ||||||
Inventories, net: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
21,788 | 20,879 | ||||||
Packaging materials |
12,506 | 12,125 | ||||||
Finished goods |
32,309 | 27,570 | ||||||
66,603 | 60,574 | |||||||
Spare parts and supplies |
36,945 | 37,085 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
4,918 | 1,095 | ||||||
Other |
35,325 | 41,924 | ||||||
Total current assets |
329,234 | 313,714 | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $699,862 and
$679,561, respectively |
600,313 | 604,693 | ||||||
Notes Receivable |
92,340 | 92,860 | ||||||
Assets Held for Sale Distributor Routes |
12,349 | 11,924 | ||||||
Other Assets |
6,198 | 5,113 | ||||||
Goodwill |
200,153 | 200,153 | ||||||
Other Intangible Assets, net |
95,188 | 97,032 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,335,775 | $ | 1,325,489 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases |
$ | 29,097 | $ | 28,432 | ||||
Accounts payable |
121,931 | 102,068 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
109,392 | 112,272 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
260,420 | 242,772 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt and Capital Leases |
90,606 | 98,870 | ||||||
Other Liabilities: |
||||||||
Post-retirement/post-employment obligations |
74,643 | 76,086 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
64,811 | 66,680 | ||||||
Other |
47,091 | 45,291 | ||||||
Total other liabilities |
186,545 | 188,057 | ||||||
Flowers Foods, Inc. Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock $100 par value, 100,000 authorized and none issued |
| | ||||||
Preferred stock $.01 par value, 900,000 authorized and none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock $.01 par value, 500,000,000 authorized shares, 101,659,924
shares and 101,659,924 shares issued, respectively |
1,017 | 1,017 | ||||||
Treasury stock 11,413,083 shares and 11,011,494 shares, respectively |
(226,931 | ) | (214,683 | ) | ||||
Capital in excess of par value |
535,400 | 539,476 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
526,772 | 503,689 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(38,054 | ) | (33,709 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
798,204 | 795,790 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,335,775 | $ | 1,325,489 | ||||
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
3
Table of Contents
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited)
FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED | ||||||||
APRIL 23, 2011 | APRIL 24, 2010 | |||||||
Sales |
$ | 801,825 | $ | 795,026 | ||||
Materials, supplies, labor and other production
costs (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
412,258 | 414,798 | ||||||
Selling, distribution and administrative expenses |
300,057 | 292,551 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
27,992 | 25,637 | ||||||
Income from operations |
61,518 | 62,040 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(2,149 | ) | (2,784 | ) | ||||
Interest income |
3,911 | 3,915 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
63,280 | 63,171 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
22,119 | 22,484 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 41,161 | $ | 40,687 | ||||
Net Income Per Common Share: |
||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||
Net income per common share |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
90,214 | 91,517 | ||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||
Net income per common share |
$ | 0.45 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
90,987 | 92,204 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid per common share |
$ | 0.200 | $ | 0.175 | ||||
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
4
Table of Contents
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | in | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Excess | Other | Treasury Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive | shares | Par | of Par | Retained | Comprehensive | Number of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) | issued | Value | Value | Earnings | Income (Loss) | shares | Cost | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2011 |
101,659,924 | $ | 1,017 | $ | 539,476 | $ | 503,689 | $ | (33,709 | ) | (11,011,494 | ) | $ | (214,683 | ) | $ | 795,790 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 41,161 | 41,161 | 41,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments, net of tax |
(4,803 | ) | (4,803 | ) | (4,803 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credits,
net of tax |
(49 | ) | (49 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial loss, net of tax |
507 | 507 | 507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 36,816 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
(802 | ) | 91,000 | 1,809 | 1,007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred stock issuance |
(551 | ) | 27,965 | 551 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock award |
(4,213 | ) | 216,050 | 4,213 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of share-based payment
compensation |
5,415 | 5,415 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefits related to share based
payment awards |
283 | 283 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance share awards forfeitures and cancellations |
860 | (44,055 | ) | (860 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(695,403 | ) | (18,029 | ) | (18,029 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of deferred compensation |
(68 | ) | 2,854 | 68 | ¯ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contingent acquisition consideration |
(5,000 | ) | (5,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid $0.200 per common share |
(18,078 | ) | (18,078 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at April 23, 2011 |
101,659,924 | $ | 1,017 | $ | 535,400 | $ | 526,772 | $ | (38,054 | ) | (11,413,083 | ) | $ | (226,931 | ) | $ | 798,204 | |||||||||||||||||||
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
5
Table of Contents
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED | ||||||||
APRIL 23, 2011 | APRIL 24, 2010 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (DISBURSED FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 41,161 | $ | 40,687 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Stock based compensation |
5,929 | 4,753 | ||||||
(Gain) loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income |
(22,919 | ) | 11,525 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
27,992 | 25,637 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(3,268 | ) | (476 | ) | ||||
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
410 | 358 | ||||||
Allowances for accounts receivable |
270 | 564 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement plans expense |
194 | 599 | ||||||
Other |
(644 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
Pension contributions |
(580 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
(10,597 | ) | (2,468 | ) | ||||
Inventories, net |
(6,439 | ) | (3,350 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
3,567 | 3,557 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
19,863 | 7,152 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
17,615 | (5,741 | ) | |||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
72,554 | 82,549 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (DISBURSED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(22,058 | ) | (29,125 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
732 | 335 | ||||||
Issuance of notes receivable |
(3,477 | ) | (1,880 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes receivable |
3,829 | 3,806 | ||||||
Contingent acquisition consideration payments |
(5,000 | ) | | |||||
Deconsolidation of variable interest entity |
| (8,804 | ) | |||||
NET CASH DISBURSED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(25,974 | ) | (35,668 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (DISBURSED FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Dividends paid |
(18,078 | ) | (16,020 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
1,007 | 2,531 | ||||||
Income tax benefit related to stock awards |
577 | 191 | ||||||
Stock repurchases |
(18,029 | ) | (2,115 | ) | ||||
Change in book overdraft |
(2,604 | ) | (2,698 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from debt borrowings |
93,500 | 213,000 | ||||||
Debt and capital lease obligation payments |
(101,041 | ) | (252,297 | ) | ||||
NET CASH DISBURSED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(44,668 | ) | (57,408 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,912 | (10,527 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
6,755 | 18,948 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 8,667 | $ | 8,421 | ||||
(See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements)
6
Table of Contents
FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements of Flowers Foods, Inc. (the company) have been prepared by the companys management in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information
and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to state fairly the companys financial
position, the results of its operations and its cash flows. The results of operations for the
sixteen week periods ended April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for a full year. The balance sheet at January 1, 2011 has been derived from
the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended January 1, 2011.
ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
company believes the following critical accounting estimates affect its more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements: revenue
recognition, derivative instruments, valuation of long-lived assets, goodwill and other
intangibles, self-insurance reserves, income tax expense and accruals and pension obligations.
These estimates are summarized in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 1, 2011.
REPORTING PERIODS The company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending the Saturday nearest
December 31. Fiscal 2011 consists of 52 weeks, with the companys quarterly reporting periods as
follows: first quarter ended April 23, 2011 (sixteen weeks), second quarter ending July 16, 2011
(twelve weeks), third quarter ending October 8, 2011 (twelve weeks) and fourth quarter ending
December 31, 2011 (twelve weeks).
SEGMENTS The company consists of two business segments: direct-store-delivery (DSD) and
warehouse delivery. The DSD segment focuses on producing and marketing bakery products to U.S.
customers in the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Southwest as well as select markets in California and
Nevada primarily through its DSD system. The warehouse delivery segment produces snack cakes for
sale to retail, vending and co-pack customers as well as frozen bread, rolls and buns for sale to
retail and foodservice customers primarily through warehouse distribution.
SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER Following is the effect our largest customer, Wal-Mart/Sams Club, had on
the companys sales for the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010. No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of the companys sales.
FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED | ||||||||
APRIL 23, 2011 | APRIL 24, 2010 | |||||||
(Percent of Sales) | ||||||||
DSD |
17.9 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||
Warehouse delivery |
4.0 | 3.0 | ||||||
Total |
21.9 | % | 21.3 | % | ||||
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES There were no significant changes to our critical accounting
policies from those disclosed in our Form 10-K filed for the year ended January 1, 2011.
7
Table of Contents
2. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The companys total comprehensive income presently consists of net income, adjustments for our
derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges, and various pension and other
postretirement benefit related items. Total comprehensive income, determined as net income adjusted
by other comprehensive income, was $36.8 million and $43.2 million for the sixteen weeks ended
April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010, respectively.
During the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011, changes to accumulated other comprehensive
loss, net of income tax, were as follows (amounts in thousands):
2011 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, January 1, 2011 |
$ | (33,709 | ) | |
Derivative transactions: |
||||
Net deferred gain on closed contracts, net of income tax of $3,815 |
6,093 | |||
Reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $(8,323) |
(13,295 | ) | ||
Effective portion of change in fair value of hedging instruments, net of income tax of $1,502 |
2,399 | |||
Amortization of prior service credits, net of income tax of $(30) |
(49 | ) | ||
Amortization of actuarial loss, net of income tax of $317 |
507 | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, April 23, 2011 |
$ | (38,054 | ) | |
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income that relate to commodity contracts are presented as an adjustment to reconcile
net income to net cash provided by operating activities on the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the sixteen weeks ended April 23,
2011. The balance as of April 23, 2011 is as follows (amounts in thousands):
DSD |
$ | 193,052 | ||
Warehouse delivery |
7,101 | |||
Total |
$ | 200,153 | ||
As of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the company had the following amounts related to
amortizable intangible assets (amounts in thousands):
April 23, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset | Cost | Amortization | Net Value | Cost | Amortization | Net Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
$ | 35,268 | $ | 5,161 | $ | 30,107 | $ | 35,268 | $ | 4,687 | $ | 30,581 | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
75,434 | 14,869 | 60,565 | 75,434 | 13,675 | 61,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
1,874 | 1,367 | 507 | 1,874 | 1,353 | 521 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributor relationships |
2,600 | 467 | 2,133 | 2,600 | 413 | 2,187 | ||||||||||||||||||
Supply agreement |
1,050 | 674 | 376 | 1,050 | 566 | 484 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 116,226 | $ | 22,538 | $ | 93,688 | $ | 116,226 | $ | 20,694 | $ | 95,532 | ||||||||||||
There is an additional $1.5 million indefinite life intangible asset, which is not being amortized, separately identified
from goodwill.
Aggregate amortization expense for the sixteen weeks ending April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010
were $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively.
Estimated amortization of intangibles for each of the next five years is as follows (amounts
in thousands):
Amortization of | ||||
Intangibles | ||||
Remainder of 2011 |
$ | 4,118 | ||
2012 |
$ | 5,677 | ||
2013 |
$ | 5,488 | ||
2014 |
$ | 5,389 | ||
2015 |
$ | 5,237 |
8
Table of Contents
4. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and short-term debt
approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of the instruments. Notes receivable are
entered into in connection with the purchase of distributors territories by independent
distributors. These notes receivable are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at carrying
value which represents the closest approximation of fair value. In accordance with GAAP, fair value
is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As a result, the
appropriate interest rate that should be used to estimate the fair value of the distributor notes
is the prevailing market rate at which similar loans would be made to distributors with similar
credit ratings and for the same maturities. However, the company finances approximately 2,550
independent distributors all with varied financial histories and credit risks. Considering the
diversity of credit risks among the independent distributors, the company has no method to
accurately determine a market interest rate to apply to the notes. The territories are generally
financed over ten years bearing an interest rate of 12% and the distributor notes are
collateralized by the independent distributors territories. The fair value of the companys
long-term debt at April 23, 2011 approximates the carrying value. For fair value disclosures
information about our derivative assets and liabilities see Note 5, Derivative Financial
Instruments.
During the sixteen weeks ending April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010, $3.9 million and $3.9
million, respectively, was recorded as interest income relating to the distributor notes.
At April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, the carrying values of the distributor
notes were as follows (amounts in thousands):
April 23, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||
Distributor notes receivable |
$ | 105,044 | $ | 105,396 | ||||
Current portion of distributor notes receivable recorded in accounts and notes receivable, net |
12,704 | 12,536 | ||||||
Long-term portion of distributor notes receivable |
$ | 92,340 | $ | 92,860 | ||||
At April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the company has evaluated the collectability of the
distributor notes and determined that a reserve is not necessary. Payments on these distributor
notes are collected by the company weekly in the distributor settlement process.
5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The company measures the fair value of its derivative portfolio using the fair value as the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal
market for that asset or liability. These measurements are classified into a hierarchy by the
inputs used to perform the fair value calculation as follows:
Level 1: Fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets
Level 2: Modeled fair value with model inputs that are all observable market values
Level 3: Modeled fair value with at least one model input that is not an observable market value
This change in measurement technique had no material impact on the reported value of our derivative
portfolio.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The company enters into commodity derivatives, designated as cash-flow hedges of existing or
future exposure to changes in commodity prices. The companys primary raw materials are flour,
sweeteners and shortening, along with pulp, paper and petroleum-based packaging products. Natural
gas, which is used as oven fuel, is also an important commodity input to production.
As of April 23, 2011, the companys hedge portfolio contained commodity derivatives with a net
fair value of $23.0 million, which is recorded in the following accounts with fair values measured
as indicated (amounts in millions):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Other current |
$ | 23.6 | $ | | $ | | $ | 23.6 | ||||||||
Other long-term |
1.1 | | | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Total |
24.7 | | | 24.7 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other current |
| (1.4 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Other long-term |
| (0.3 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
| (1.7 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Fair Value |
$ | 24.7 | $ | (1.7 | ) | $ | | $ | 23.0 | |||||||
9
Table of Contents
The positions held in the portfolio are used to hedge economic exposure to changes in
various raw material prices and effectively fix the price, or limit increases in prices, for a
period of time extending into fiscal 2012. These instruments are designated as cash-flow hedges.
The effective portion of changes in fair value for these derivatives is recorded each period in
other comprehensive income (loss), and any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is
recorded to current period earnings in selling, distribution and administrative expenses. All of
the company held commodity derivatives at April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011 qualified for hedge
accounting.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The company entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $85.0 million, and $65.0
million, respectively, to fix the interest rate on the $150.0 million term loan secured on August
1, 2008 to fund the acquisitions of ButterKrust Bakery and Holsum Bakery, Inc.
The interest rate swap agreements result in the company paying or receiving the difference
between the fixed and floating rates at specified intervals calculated based on the notional
amount. The interest rate differential to be paid or received will be recorded as interest expense.
These swap transactions are designated as cash-flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of
changes in the fair value of the swaps is recorded each period in other comprehensive income. Any
ineffective portions of changes in fair value are recorded to current period earnings in selling,
distribution and administrative expenses.
As of April 23, 2011, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was $(5.6) million, which is
recorded in the following accounts with fair values measured as indicated (amounts in millions):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Other current |
$ | | $ | (3.6 | ) | $ | | $ | (3.6 | ) | ||||||
Other long-term |
| (2.0 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
| (5.6 | ) | | (5.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Fair Value |
$ | | $ | (5.6 | ) | $ | | $ | (5.6 | ) | ||||||
During the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011, interest expense of $1.3 million was recognized
due to periodic settlements of the swap agreements.
The company has the following derivative instruments located on the consolidated balance
sheet, utilized for risk management purposes detailed above (amounts in thousands):
Derivative Assets | Derivative Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 23, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | April 23, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Balance | Balance | Balance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
instruments | location | Value | location | Value | location | Value | location | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts
|
| $ | | | $ | | Other current liabilities | $ | 3,580 | Other current liabilities | $ | 3,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts
|
| | | | Other long term liabilities | 2,059 | Other long term liabilities | 2,684 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Other current assets | 23,577 | Other current assets | 22,380 | Other current liabilities | 1,346 | Other current liabilities | 2,032 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Other long term assets | 1,116 | Other long term assets | | Other long term liabilities | 302 | Other long term liabilities | 371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24,693 | $ | 22,380 | $ | 7,287 | $ | 8,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The company has the following derivative instruments located on the consolidated
statement of income, utilized for risk management purposes detailed above (amounts in thousands and
net of tax):
Amount of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified | |||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in OCI on | from Accumulated OCI into Income | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in | Derivative (Effective Portion)(Net of tax) | Location of Gain or (Loss) | (Effective Portion)(Net of tax) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedge | For the sixteen weeks ended | Reclassified from AOCI into Income | For the sixteen weeks ended | |||||||||||||||||
Relationships | April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | (Effective Portion) | April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
$ | (138 | ) | $ | (891 | ) | Interest expense (income) | $ | (800 | ) | $ | (942 | ) | |||||||
Commodity contracts |
8,630 | (4,859 | ) | Production costs(1) | 14,095 | (7,088 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,492 | $ | (5,750 | ) | $ | 13,295 | $ | (8,030 | ) | ||||||||||
1. | Included in Materials, supplies, labor and other production costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately). |
10
Table of Contents
The balance in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to commodity price risk
and interest rate risk derivative transactions that are closed or will expire in the next four
years are as follows (amounts in millions and net of tax) at April 23, 2011:
Commodity price | Interest rate risk | |||||||||||
risk derivatives | derivatives | Totals | ||||||||||
Closed contracts |
$ | 8.2 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 8.4 | ||||||
Expiring in 2011 |
11.6 | (1.6 | ) | 10.0 | ||||||||
Expiring in 2012 |
2.6 | (1.6 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||
Expiring in 2013 |
| (0.3 | ) | (0.3 | ) | |||||||
Total |
$ | 22.4 | $ | (3.3 | ) | $ | 19.1 | |||||
As of April 23, 2011, the company had the following outstanding financial contracts that were
entered to hedge commodity and interest rate risk:
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedge Relationship | Notional amount (millions) | |||
Interest rate contracts |
$ | 108.8 | ||
Wheat contracts |
152.3 | |||
Soybean oil contracts |
18.3 | |||
Natural gas contracts |
11.3 | |||
Total |
$ | 290.7 | ||
The companys derivative instruments contain no credit-risk-related contingent features at
April 23, 2011. As of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the company had $10.9 million and $11.5
million, respectively, in other accrued liabilities representing collateral from counterparties for
hedged positions.
6. DEBT AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS
Long-term debt and capital leases consisted of the following at April 23, 2011 and January 1,
2011 (amounts in thousands):
April 23, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||
Unsecured credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Unsecured term loan |
108,750 | 114,375 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations |
8,732 | 10,541 | ||||||
Other notes payable |
2,221 | 2,386 | ||||||
119,703 | 127,302 | |||||||
Less current maturities |
29,097 | 28,432 | ||||||
Total long-term debt and capital leases |
$ | 90,606 | $ | 98,870 | ||||
On August 1, 2008, the company entered into a Credit Agreement (the term loan) with various
lending parties for the purpose of completing two acquisitions. The term loan provides for an
amortizing $150.0 million of borrowings through the maturity date of August 1, 2013. The term loan
includes certain customary restrictions, which, among other things, require maintenance of
financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and creation of indebtedness. Restrictive
financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage
ratio. The company believes that, given its current cash position, its cash flow from operating
activities and its available credit capacity, it can comply with the current terms of the term loan
and can meet presently foreseeable financial requirements. As of April 23, 2011 and January 1,
2011, the company was in compliance with all restrictive financial covenants under the term loan.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar rate
or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as the rate offered in
the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds rate plus
0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.0% to 1.375% for base rate loans and from 0.875% to
2.375% for Eurodollar loans and is based on the companys leverage ratio. Principal payments began
on December 31, 2008 and are due quarterly under the term loan at an annual amortization of 10% of
the principal balance for the first two years, 15% during the third year, 20%
during the fourth year, and 45% during the fifth year. The company paid financing costs of
$0.8 million in connection with the term loan, which is being amortized over the life of the term
loan.
The company has a five-year, $250.0 million senior unsecured revolving loan facility (the
credit facility) which expires October 5, 2012. The company may request to increase its
borrowings under the credit facility up to an aggregate of $350.0 million upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions. Proceeds from the credit facility may be used for working capital and general
corporate purposes, including acquisition financing, refinancing of indebtedness and share
repurchases. The credit facility includes certain customary restrictions, which, among other
things, require maintenance of financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and creation of
indebtedness. Restrictive financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum interest coverage
ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The company believes that, given its current cash position, its
cash flow from operating activities and its available credit capacity, it can comply with the
current terms of the credit facility and can meet presently foreseeable financial requirements. As
of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the company was in compliance with all restrictive financial
covenants under its credit facility.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on any outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar
rate or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as rates offered
in the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal
11
Table of Contents
funds rate
plus 0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.0% to 0.30% for base rate loans and from 0.40% to
1.275% for Eurodollar loans. In addition, a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.35% is due
quarterly on all commitments under the credit facility. Both the interest margin and the facility
fee are based on the companys leverage ratio. Financing costs of $0.9 million were deferred and
are being amortized over the term of the credit facility.
Book overdrafts occur when checks have been issued but have not been presented to the bank for
payment. These bank accounts allow us to delay funding of issued checks until the checks are
presented for payment. A delay in funding results in a temporary source of financing from the bank.
The activity related to book overdrafts is shown as a financing activity in our consolidated
statements of cash flows. Book overdrafts are included in other current liabilities on our
consolidated balance sheets. As of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the book overdraft balance
was $7.0 million and $9.7 million, respectively.
7. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY
The company maintains a transportation agreement with an entity that transports a significant
portion of the companys fresh bakery products from the companys production facilities to outlying
distribution centers. The company represents a significant portion of the entitys revenue. This
entity qualifies as a VIE. Under previous accounting guidance, we consolidated the VIE in our
consolidated financial statements from the first quarter of 2004 through the fourth quarter of 2009
because during that time the company was considered to be the primary beneficiary. Under the
revised principles, which became effective at the beginning of our fiscal 2010, we determined that
the company is no longer the primary beneficiary and we deconsolidated the VIE in our financial
statements. The VIE has collateral that is sufficient to meet its capital lease and other debt
obligations and the owner of the VIE personally guarantees the obligations of the VIE. The VIEs
creditors have no recourse against the general credit of the company.
The company has no exposure to gains or losses of the VIE in reporting its net income. In
addition, the company does not have explicit or implied power over any of the significant
activities to operate the VIE. The primary beneficiary of the VIE realizes the economic benefits
and losses incurred and has the power to direct most of the significant activities. The VIE is
permitted to pass along increases in their costs, with company approval, at a capped increase of 2%
per year. The company and the VIE also agree on a rebate paid or credited to the company depending
on the profitability of the VIE in the preceding year. We do not guarantee the VIEs specific
returns or performance benchmarks. In addition, if a manufacturing facility closes or there is a
loss of market share causing the VIE to have to move their equipment the company will make an
effort to move the equipment to another manufacturing facility. If the company is unable to do so,
we will reimburse the VIE for any losses incurred in the disposal of the equipment and will pay the
cost to transfer the equipment. The companys maximum loss exposure for the truck disposals is the
difference in the estimated fair value of the trucks from the book value.
As part of the deconsolidation of the VIE, the company concluded that certain of the trucks
and trailers the VIE uses for distributing our products from the manufacturing facilities to the
distribution centers qualify as right to use leases. As of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011,
there was $8.1 million and $9.7 million, respectively, in net property, plant and equipment and
capital lease obligations associated with the right to use leases.
8. LITIGATION
The company and its subsidiaries from time to time are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits,
claims, investigations and proceedings, which are being handled and defended in the ordinary course
of business. While the company is unable to predict the outcome of these
matters, it believes, based upon currently available facts, that it is remote that the
ultimate resolution of any such pending matters will have a material adverse effect on its overall
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the future. However, adverse
developments could negatively impact earnings in a particular future fiscal period.
On July 23, 2008, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company filed a lawsuit against Hostess
Brands, Inc. (Hostess) (formerly Interstate Bakeries Corporation) in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaint alleges that Hostess is infringing upon
Flowers Natures Own trademarks by using or intending to use the Natures Pride trademark. Flowers
asserts that Hostess sale or intended sale of baked goods under the Natures Pride trademark is
likely to cause confusion with, and likely to dilute the distinctiveness of, the Natures Own mark
and constitutes unfair competition and deceptive trade practices. Flowers is seeking actual
damages, an accounting of Hostess profits from its sales of Natures Pride products, and
injunctive relief. Flowers sought summary judgment for its claims, which was denied by the court.
Unless our motion for reconsideration is granted and changes that ruling, we expect this case to
proceed to trial in 2011.
The companys facilities are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations
regarding the discharge of material into the environment and the protection of the environment in
other ways. The company is not a party to any material proceedings arising under these regulations.
The company believes that compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations will not
materially affect the consolidated financial condition or the competitive position of the company.
The company is currently in substantial compliance with all material environmental regulations
affecting the company and its properties.
12
Table of Contents
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of net income and weighted average shares for calculating
basic and diluted earnings per common share for the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 and April
24, 2010 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | ||||||||
April 23, | April 24, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 41,161 | $ | 40,687 | ||||
Dividends on participating securities not expected to vest* |
| | ||||||
Net income attributable to common and participating shareholders |
$ | 41,161 | $ | 40,687 | ||||
Basic Earnings Per Common Share: |
||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for common stock |
90,118 | 91,251 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for participating securities |
96 | 266 | ||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding for common stock |
90,214 | 91,517 | ||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.46 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share: |
||||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding for common stock |
90,214 | 91,517 | ||||||
Add: Shares of common stock assumed issued upon exercise of
stock options and vesting of restricted stock |
773 | 687 | ||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding for common stock |
90,987 | 92,204 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.45 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
* | The company expects all participating securities share awards outstanding at April 24, 2010 to vest. |
Stock options to purchase 2,249,667 shares and 2,128,925 shares of common stock were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the sixteen weeks ended April 23,
2011 and April 24, 2010, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
10. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Our 2001 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of April 1, 2009,
(EPIP) was approved by our shareholders and authorizes the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors to make a variety of stock-based awards while selecting the form that is most appropriate
for the company and eligible recipients. Our officers, key employees and non-employee directors
(whose grants are generally approved by the full Board of Directors) are eligible to receive awards
under the EPIP. The aggregate number of shares that may be issued or transferred under the EPIP is
18,625,000 shares. Over the life of the EPIP, the company has only issued options, restricted stock
and deferred stock. The following is a summary of stock options, restricted stock,
and deferred stock outstanding under the EPIP. Information relating to the companys stock
appreciation rights which are not issued under the EPIP is also disclosed below.
Stock Options
The following non-qualified stock options (NQSOs) have been granted under the EPIP with
service period remaining. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to estimate the grant
date fair value (amounts in thousands, except price data and as indicated):
Grant date | 2/10/2011 | 2/9/2010 | 2/9/2009 | |||||||||
Shares granted |
1,428 | 1,136 | 993 | |||||||||
Exercise price($) |
24.47 | 25.01 | 23.84 | |||||||||
Vesting date |
2/10/2014 | 2/9/2013 | 2/9/2012 | |||||||||
Fair value per share($) |
5.20 | 5.54 | 5.87 | |||||||||
Dividend yield(%)(1) |
3.00 | 3.00 | 2.20 | |||||||||
Expected volatility(%)(2) |
29.20 | 30.60 | 31.80 | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate(%)(3) |
2.44 | 2.35 | 2.00 | |||||||||
Expected option life (years)(4) |
5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | |||||||||
Outstanding at April 23, 2011 |
1,428 | 1,117 | 979 |
1. | Dividend yield estimated yield based on the historical dividend payment for the four most
recent dividend payments prior to the grant date. |
|
2. | Expected volatility based on historical volatility over the expected term using daily
stock prices. |
|
3. | Risk-free interest rate United States Treasury Constant Maturity rates as of the grant
date over the expected term. |
|
4. | Expected option life The 2009, 2010, and 2011 grant assumptions are based on the simplified
formula determined in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The company does not
have sufficient historical exercise behavior data to reasonably estimate the expected option
life. |
13
Table of Contents
The stock option activity for the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 pursuant to the EPIP is
set forth below (amounts in thousands, except price data):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Options | Price | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
4,365 | $ | 22.00 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
1,428 | $ | 24.47 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(91 | ) | $ | 11.07 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(20 | ) | $ | 24.50 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 23, 2011 |
5,682 | $ | 22.78 | 4.77 | $ | 37,195 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at April 23, 2011 |
2,168 | $ | 20.06 | 2.87 | $ | 20,102 | ||||||||||
As of April 23, 2011, all options outstanding under the EPIP had an average exercise price of
$22.78 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.77 years.
As of April 23, 2011, there was $9.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense
related to unnvested stock options. This expense is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
The cash received, the (shortfall) windfall tax (expense) benefit, and intrinsic value from
stock option exercises for the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010 were as
follows (amounts in thousands):
April 23, | April 24, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash received from option exercises |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 2,531 | ||||
Cash tax windfall (shortfall), net |
$ | 489 | $ | (34 | ) | |||
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
$ | 1,520 | $ | 736 |
Generally, if the employee dies, becomes disabled or retires at normal retirement age (age 65
or later), the nonqualified stock options immediately vest and must be exercised within two years.
In addition, nonqualified stock options will vest if the company undergoes a change in control.
Performance-Contingent Restricted Stock
Certain key employees have been granted performance-contingent restricted stock. The awards
generally vest approximately two years from the date of grant (after the filing of the companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K) and the performance condition requires the companys return on
invested capital to exceed its weighted average cost of capital by 3.75% (the ROI Target) over
the two fiscal years immediately preceding the vesting date. If the ROI Target is not met the
awards are forfeited. Furthermore, each grant of performance-contingent restricted stock will be
adjusted as set forth in the market condition described below:
| if the ROI Target is satisfied, then the performance-contingent restricted stock grant
may be adjusted based on the companys total return to shareholders (Company TSR) percent
rank as compared to the total return to shareholders of the S&P Packaged Food & Meat Index
(S&P TSR) in the manner set forth below: |
| If the Company TSR rank is equal to the 50th percentile of the S&P TSR, then no
adjustment; |
||
| If the Company TSR rank is less than the 50th percentile of the S&P TSR, the grant
shall be reduced by 1.3% for each percentile below the 50th percentile that the Company
TSR is less than the 50th percentile of S&P TSR, but in no event shall such reduction
exceed 20%; or |
||
| If the Company TSR rank is greater than the 50th percentile of the S&P TSR, the
grant shall be increased by 1.3% for each percentile above the 50th percentile that
Company TSR is greater than the 50th percentile of S&P TSR, but in no event shall such
increase exceed 20%. |
In connection with the vesting of the performance-contingent restricted stock granted in
February 2009, during the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011, the Company TSR rank was less than
the 50th percentile and the grant was reduced by 20% of the award or 40,280 common
shares. The total amount of shares that were issued to plan participants was 161,120. Because the
company achieved the ROI Target the total cost for the award was not reversed for the portion of
shares that did not vest.
The performance-contingent restricted stock generally vests immediately if the grantee dies or
becomes disabled. However, at normal retirement the grantee will receive a pro-rata number of
shares through the grantees retirement date at the normal vesting date. In addition, the
performance-contingent restricted stock will immediately vest at the grant date award level without
adjustment if the company undergoes
14
Table of Contents
a change in control. During the vesting period, the grantee is
treated as a normal shareholder with respect to voting rights. Dividends declared during the
vesting period will accrue and will be paid at vesting for the shares that ultimately vest but will
not exceed 100% of the award. The fair value estimate was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation
model, which utilizes multiple input variables to determine the probability of the company
achieving the market condition discussed above. Inputs into the model included the following for
the company and comparator companies: (i) total stockholder return from the beginning of the
performance cycle through the measurement date; (ii) volatility; (iii) risk-free interest rates;
and (iv) the correlation of the comparator companies total stockholder return. The inputs are
based on historical capital market data.
The following restricted stock awards have been granted under the EPIP since fiscal 2009
(amounts in thousands, except price data):
Grant date | 2/10/2011 | 2/9/2010 | 2/9/2009 | |||||||||
Shares granted |
216 | 179 | 204 | |||||||||
Approximate vesting date |
2/10/2013 | 2/9/2012 | 2/9/2011 | |||||||||
Fair value per share |
$ | 23.90 | $ | 26.38 | $ | 24.96 |
A summary of the status of the companys nonvested shares as of April 23, 2011, and changes
during the quarter ended April 23, 2011, is presented below (amounts in thousands, except price
data):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2011 |
379 | $ | 25.62 | |||||
Granted |
216 | $ | 23.90 | |||||
Vested |
(161 | ) | $ | 24.96 | ||||
Canceled |
(40 | ) | $ | 24.96 | ||||
Forfeited |
(5 | ) | $ | 25.57 | ||||
Nonvested at April 23, 2011 |
389 | $ | 25.00 | |||||
As of April 23, 2011, there was $6.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested restricted stock granted by the EPIP. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.5 years. The total intrinsic value of shares vested during the period
ended April 23, 2011 was $3.4 million.
Stock Appreciation Rights
Prior to 2007, the company allowed non-employee directors to convert their retainers and
committee chairman fees into rights. These rights vest after one year and can be exercised over
nine years. The company records compensation expense for these rights at a measurement date based
on changes between the grant price and an estimated fair value of the rights using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The fair value of the rights at April 23, 2011 ranged from $12.02 to $27.39. The following
assumptions were used to determine fair value of the rights discussed above using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model at April 23, 2011: dividend yield 3.1%; expected volatility 29.0%; risk-free
interest rate 2.15% and expected life of 0.20 years to 2.55 years.
The rights activity for the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 is set forth below (amounts in
thousands except price data):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Rights | Price | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
231 | $ | 11.14 | |||||||||||||
Rights exercised |
(24 | ) | 12.71 | |||||||||||||
Rights forfeited |
| | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 23, 2011 |
207 | $ | 10.94 | 2.62 | $ | 3,807 | ||||||||||
Deferred Stock
Pursuant to the EPIP, the company allows non-employee directors to convert their annual board
retainers into deferred stock. The deferred stock has a minimum two year vesting period and will be
distributed to the individual (along with accumulated dividends) at a time designated by the
individual at the date of conversion. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011 an aggregate of
16,040 shares were converted. The company records compensation expense for this deferred stock over
the two-year minimum vesting period based on the closing price of the companys common stock on the
date of conversion. During the sixteen weeks ending April 23, 2011, a total of 20,950 deferred
shares were exercised for retainer conversions.
15
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the EPIP non-employee directors also receive annual grants of deferred stock.
This deferred stock vests over one year from the grant date. During the second quarter of fiscal
2010, non-employee directors were granted an aggregate of 44,220 shares of deferred stock. The
deferred stock will be distributed to the grantee at a time designated by the grantee at the date
of grant. Compensation expense is recorded on this deferred stock over the one year minimum vesting
period. During the sixteen weeks ending April 23, 2011, a total of 7,015 deferred shares were
exercised for annual grant awards.
The deferred stock activity for the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 is set forth below
(amounts in thousands, except price data):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Grant | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Term (Years) | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
160 | $ | 22.66 | |||||||||||||
Deferred stock issued |
16 | $ | 24.33 | |||||||||||||
Deferred stock exercised |
(28 | ) | $ | 22.29 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 23, 2011 |
148 | $ | 22.91 | 0.31 | $ | 4,343 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes the companys stock based compensation expense for the sixteen
weeks ended April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010 (amounts in thousands):
April 23, | April 24, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Stock options |
$ | 3,542 | $ | 2,410 | ||||
Performance-contingent restricted stock |
1,432 | 1,546 | ||||||
Stock appreciation rights |
514 | 366 | ||||||
Deferred stock |
441 | 431 | ||||||
Total stock based compensation |
$ | 5,929 | $ | 4,753 | ||||
11. POST-RETIREMENT PLANS
The following summarizes the companys balance sheet related pension and other postretirement
benefit plan accounts at April 23, 2011 as compared to accounts at January 1, 2011 (amounts in
thousands):
AS OF | ||||||||
April 23, | January 1, | |||||||
2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Current benefit liability |
$ | 1,011 | $ | 1,011 | ||||
Noncurrent benefit liability |
$ | 74,643 | $ | 76,086 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | 57,157 | $ | 57,614 |
Defined Benefit Plans
The company has trusteed, noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain
employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employees career earnings. The plans
are funded at amounts deductible for income tax purposes but not less than the minimum funding
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). As of April 24, 2010,
the assets of the plans included certificates of deposit, marketable equity securities, mutual
funds, corporate and government debt securities, private and public real estate partnerships, other
diversifying strategies and annuity contracts. Effective January 1, 2006, the company curtailed the
defined benefit plan that covers the majority of its workforce. Benefits under this plan were
frozen, and no future benefits will accrue under this plan. The company continues to maintain a
plan that covers a small number of certain union employees. During the sixteen weeks ended April
23, 2011 the company contributed $0.6 million to company pension plans.
The net periodic pension (benefit) cost for the companys plans include the following
components (amounts in thousands):
FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED | ||||||||
APRIL 23, | APRIL 24, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Service cost |
$ | 147 | $ | 119 | ||||
Interest cost |
5,616 | 5,743 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(6,657 | ) | (6,358 | ) | ||||
Amortization of net loss |
839 | 670 | ||||||
Total net periodic benefit cost |
$ | (55 | ) | $ | 174 | |||
The company also has several smaller Defined Benefit Plans associated with recent acquisitions
that will be merged into the Flowers Foods Defined Benefit Plans after receipt of final
determination letters.
16
Table of Contents
Post-retirement Benefit Plan
The company provides certain medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retired
employees. The plans incorporate an up-front deductible, coinsurance payments and retiree
contributions at various premium levels. Eligibility and maximum period of coverage is based on age
and length of service.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the company includes the following components
(amounts in thousands):
FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED | ||||||||
APRIL 23, | APRIL 24, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Service cost |
$ | 131 | $ | 198 | ||||
Interest cost |
212 | 271 | ||||||
Amortization of net (gain) loss |
(15 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost |
(79 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Total net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 249 | $ | 425 | ||||
401(k) Retirement Savings Plan
The Flowers Foods 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan) covers substantially all of the
companys employees who have completed certain service requirements. The cost and contributions for
those employees who also participate in the defined benefit pension plan is 25% of the first $400
contributed by the employee. Prior to January 1, 2006, the costs and contributions for employees
who do not participate in the defined benefit pension plan was 2% of compensation and 50% of the
employees contributions, up to 6% of compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, the costs and
contributions for employees who do not participate in the defined benefit pension plan increased to
3% of compensation and 50% of the employees contributions, up to 6% of compensation. During the
sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010, the total cost and contributions were $6.0
million and $5.5 million, respectively.
The company also has a smaller 401(k) Plan associated with an acquisition that will be merged
into the Flowers Foods 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan later this year.
12. INCOME TAXES
The companys effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was 35.0%. This rate is
slightly higher than the 2010 annual effective rate of 34.9%, which included the benefit of
favorable discrete items. The companys current effective rate is favorably impacted by an increase
in the Section 199 qualifying production activities deduction. The most significant differences in
the effective rate and the statutory rate are state income taxes and the Section 199 qualifying
production activities deduction.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the companys activity with respect to its FIN 48
reserve and related interest expense accrual was immaterial. At this time, we do not anticipate
significant changes to the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months.
17
Table of Contents
13. SEGMENT REPORTING
DSD produces fresh and frozen packaged bread and rolls and warehouse delivery produces frozen
bread and rolls, tortillas and snack products. The company evaluates each segments performance
based on income or loss before interest and income taxes, excluding unallocated expenses and
charges which the companys management deems to be an overall corporate cost or a cost not
reflective of the segments core operating businesses. Information regarding the operations in
these reportable segments is as follows:
FOR THE SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED | ||||||||
APRIL 23, | APRIL 24, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
SALES: |
||||||||
DSD |
$ | 654,231 | $ | 653,778 | ||||
Warehouse delivery |
191,802 | 184,945 | ||||||
Eliminations: Sales from warehouse
delivery to DSD |
(36,827 | ) | (36,093 | ) | ||||
Sales from DSD to warehouse delivery |
(7,381 | ) | (7,604 | ) | ||||
$ | 801,825 | $ | 795,026 | |||||
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION: |
||||||||
DSD |
$ | 21,867 | $ | 20,102 | ||||
Warehouse delivery |
6,056 | 5,536 | ||||||
Other |
69 | (1 | ) | |||||
$ | 27,992 | $ | 25,637 | |||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
DSD |
$ | 64,219 | $ | 60,683 | ||||
Warehouse delivery |
11,331 | 13,533 | ||||||
Other |
(14,032 | ) | (12,176 | ) | ||||
$ | 61,518 | $ | 62,040 | |||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
$ | 1,762 | $ | 1,131 | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
$ | 63,280 | $ | 63,171 | ||||
Sales by product category in each reportable segment are as follows (amounts in thousands):
For the Sixteen Weeks Ended April 23, 2011 | For the Sixteen Weeks Ended April 24, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse | Warehouse | |||||||||||||||||||||||
DSD | Delivery | Total | DSD | Delivery | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Branded Retail |
$ | 379,748 | $ | 27,906 | $ | 407,654 | $ | 378,462 | $ | 40,978 | $ | 419,440 | ||||||||||||
Store Branded Retail |
102,044 | 39,281 | 141,325 | 99,531 | 21,336 | 120,867 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-retail and Other |
165,058 | 87,788 | 252,846 | 168,181 | 86,538 | 254,719 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 646,850 | $ | 154,975 | $ | 801,825 | $ | 646,174 | $ | 148,852 | $ | 795,026 | ||||||||||||
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The company has evaluated subsequent events since April 23, 2011, the date of these financial
statements. There were no events or transactions discovered during this evaluation that require
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
18
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the company
as of and for the sixteen week period ended April 23, 2011 should be read in conjunction with the
companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011.
OVERVIEW:
Flowers Foods is one of the nations leading producers and marketers of packaged bakery foods
for retail and foodservice customers. The company produces breads, buns, rolls, tortillas, snack
cakes and pastries that are distributed fresh to U.S. customers in the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic, and
Southwest as well as select markets in California and Nevada and frozen to customers nationwide.
Our businesses are organized into two reportable segments: DSD and warehouse delivery. The DSD
segment focuses on the production and marketing of bakery products to U.S. customers in the
Southeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Southwest as well as select markets in California and Nevada primarily
through its DSD system. The warehouse delivery segment produces snack cakes for sale to co-pack,
retail and vending customers nationwide as well as frozen bread, rolls and buns and tortillas for
sale to retail and foodservice customers nationwide primarily through warehouse distribution.
We aim to achieve consistent and sustainable growth in sales and earnings by focusing on
improvement in the operating results of our existing businesses and, after detailed analysis,
acquiring businesses and properties that add value to the company. We believe this consistent and
sustainable growth will build value for our shareholders.
On April 11, 2011 the company announced a definitive merger agreement whereby we will acquire
all the outstanding shares of Tasty Baking Company (Tasty) for $4.00 per share in cash for a
total purchase price of approximately $165.0 million, including Tastys indebtedness. The
acquisition is expected to strengthen the companys snack cake business through the addition of the
Tastykake snack cake brand. In addition, the company will expand our geographic reach and add two
highly efficient bakeries with additional capacity to support growth. We also expect to generate
operating synergies through additional revenue and cost-saving opportunities. On April 21, 2011,
the company announced its tender offer for all outstanding shares of Tastys common stock at $4.00
per share, net to the seller in cash, without interest and less any required withholding taxes. The
tender offer was made in connection with the definitive merger agreement and is scheduled to expire
at midnight Philadelphia, PA time on May 19, 2011, unless extended. It is expected that this
transaction will close during our fiscal second quarter.
The company also closed a manufacturing facility during the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The
costs associated with closing the facility were approximately $5.7 million, net of operational
savings. Additional information is included in the Consolidated and Segment Results discussion
below.
Sales are principally affected by pricing, quality, brand recognition, new product
introductions and product line extensions, marketing and service. The company manages these factors
to achieve a sales mix favoring its higher-margin branded products, while using store brand
products to absorb overhead costs and maximize use of production capacity. During the first quarter
of 2011, our results were impacted by the competitive landscape and high promotional activity
within the baking industry. Sales for the quarter ended April 23, 2011 increased 0.9% from the
quarter ended April 24, 2010. This increase was primarily due to net positive pricing and mix shifts of
2.1% and a decrease in volume of 1.2%.
Commodities, such as our baking ingredients, periodically experience price fluctuations, and,
for that reason, we continually monitor the market for these commodities. The cost of these inputs
may fluctuate widely due to government policy and regulation, weather conditions, domestic and
international demand or other unforeseen circumstances. Agricultural commodity prices reached all
time high levels during 2007 and the first half of 2008 before declining during 2009. Commodity
prices began to rise in the second half of 2010 and are expected to continue rising during 2011. We
enter into forward purchase agreements and other derivative financial instruments qualifying for
hedge accounting to reduce the impact of such volatility in raw material prices. Any decrease in
the availability of these agreements and instruments could increase the price of these raw
materials and significantly affect our earnings.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). These principles are numerous and complex. Our significant accounting policies
are summarized in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1,
2011. In many instances, the application of GAAP requires management to make estimates or to apply
subjective principles to particular facts and circumstances. A variance in the estimates used or a
variance in the application or interpretation of GAAP could yield a materially different accounting
result. Please see our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011, for a discussion of the
areas where we believe that the estimates, judgments or interpretations that we have made, if
different, could yield the most significant differences in our financial statements. There have
been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our Form
10-K filed for the year ended January 1, 2011.
19
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
Results of operations, expressed as a percentage of sales and the dollar and percentage change
from period to period, for the sixteen week periods ended April 23, 2011 and April 24, 2010, are
set forth below (Dollars in thousands):
For the sixteen weeks ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Sales | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | Dollars | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DSD |
$ | 646,850 | $ | 646,174 | 80.7 | 81.3 | $ | 676 | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Warehouse delivery |
154,975 | 148,852 | 19.3 | 18.7 | 6,123 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 801,825 | $ | 795,026 | 100.0 | 100.0 | $ | 6,799 | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||
Materials, supplies, labor and other production
costs (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
DSD (1) |
$ | 298,643 | $ | 308,830 | 46.2 | 47.8 | $ | (10,187 | ) | (3.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Warehouse delivery(1) |
113,615 | 105,968 | 73.3 | 71.2 | 7,647 | 7.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 412,258 | $ | 414,798 | 51.4 | 52.2 | $ | (2,540 | ) | (0.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Selling, distribution and administrative expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
DSD(1) |
$ | 262,121 | $ | 256,559 | 40.5 | 39.7 | $ | 5,562 | 2.2 | |||||||||||||||
Warehouse delivery(1) |
23,973 | 23,815 | 15.5 | 16.0 | 158 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate(2) |
13,963 | 12,177 | | | 1,786 | 14.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 300,057 | $ | 292,551 | 37.4 | 36.8 | $ | 7,506 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
DSD(1) |
$ | 21,867 | $ | 20,102 | 3.4 | 3.1 | $ | 1,765 | 8.8 | |||||||||||||||
Warehouse delivery(1) |
6,056 | 5,536 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 520 | 9.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate(2) |
69 | (1 | ) | | | 70 | NM | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 27,992 | $ | 25,637 | 3.5 | 3.2 | $ | 2,355 | 9.2 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
DSD(1) |
$ | 64,219 | $ | 60,683 | 9.9 | 9.4 | $ | 3,537 | 5.8 | |||||||||||||||
Warehouse delivery(1) |
11,331 | 13,533 | 7.3 | 9.1 | (2,202 | ) | (16.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate(2) |
(14,032 | ) | (12,176 | ) | | | (1,857 | ) | (15.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 61,518 | $ | 62,040 | 7.7 | 7.8 | $ | (522 | ) | (0.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest income, net |
$ | 1,762 | $ | 1,131 | 0.2 | 0.1 | $ | 631 | 55.8 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 22,119 | $ | 22,484 | 2.8 | 2.8 | $ | (365 | ) | (1.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 41,161 | $ | 40,687 | 5.1 | 5.1 | $ | 474 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||
1. | As a percentage of revenue within the reporting segment | |
2. | The corporate segment has no revenues |
20
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED AND SEGMENT RESULTS
SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED APRIL 23, 2011 COMPARED TO SIXTEEN WEEKS ENDED APRIL 24, 2010
Consolidated Sales.
For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | % Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in | (Amounts in | |||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Branded Retail |
$ | 407,654 | 50.8 | % | $ | 419,440 | 52.8 | % | (2.8 | )% | ||||||||||
Store Branded Retail |
141,325 | 17.6 | 120,867 | 15.2 | 16.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-retail and Other |
252,846 | 31.6 | 254,719 | 32.0 | (0.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 801,825 | 100.0 | % | $ | 795,026 | 100.0 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
The 0.9% increase in sales was attributable to the following:
Favorable | ||||
Percentage Point Change in Sales Attributed to: | (Unfavorable) | |||
Pricing/Mix |
2.1 | % | ||
Volume |
(1.2 | )% | ||
Total percentage change in sales |
0.9 | % | ||
Sales category discussion
The decrease in branded retail sales was due primarily to volume decreases, partially offset
by net pricing/mix increases. Declines in branded multi-pak cake and branded white bread were partially
offset by increases in branded soft variety. The increase in store branded retail sales was due to
volume increases in store branded cake as some of the companys customers introduced store branded
cake programs in the prior year. The decrease in non-retail and other sales was due primarily to
volume declines.
Direct-Store-Delivery Sales.
For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | % Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in | (Amounts in | |||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Branded Retail |
$ | 379,748 | 58.7 | % | $ | 378,462 | 58.6 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||
Store Branded Retail |
102,044 | 15.8 | 99,531 | 15.4 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-retail and Other |
165,058 | 25.5 | 168,181 | 26.0 | (1.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 646,850 | 100.0 | % | $ | 646,174 | 100.0 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
The 0.1% increase in sales was attributable to the following:
Favorable | ||||
Percentage Point Change in Sales Attributed to: | (Unfavorable) | |||
Pricing/Mix |
1.9 | % | ||
Volume |
(1.8 | )% | ||
Total percentage change in sales |
0.1 | % | ||
Sales category discussion
The increase in branded retail sales was due primarily to net pricing/mix increases, partially
offset by volume decreases. Growth in branded soft variety and branded cake were partially offset
by decreases in branded white bread. The increase in store branded retail sales was due to volume
increases in store branded white bread and store branded buns/rolls/tortillas. The decrease in
non-retail and other sales was due to volume declines, partially offset by price/mix increases.
21
Table of Contents
Warehouse Delivery Sales.
For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | For the Sixteen Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
April 23, 2011 | April 24, 2010 | % Increase | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in | (Amounts in | |||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Branded Retail |
$ | 27,906 | 18.0 | % | $ | 40,978 | 27.5 | % | (31.9 | )% | ||||||||||
Store Branded Retail |
39,281 | 25.3 | 21,336 | 14.3 | 84.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Non-retail and Other |
87,788 | 56.7 | 86,538 | 58.2 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 154,975 | 100.0 | % | $ | 148,852 | 100.0 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||
The 4.1% increase in sales was attributable to the following:
Percentage Point Change in Sales Attributed to: | Favorable | |||
Pricing/Mix |
4.1 | % | ||
Volume |
| |||
Total percentage change in sales |
4.1 | % | ||
Sales category discussion
The decrease in branded retail sales was primarily the result of decreased multi-pak cake
volume. The increase in store branded retail sales was due to volume increases in store branded
cake as some of the companys customers introduced store branded cake programs in the prior year.
The increase in non-retail and other sales, which include contract production and vending, was
primarily due to net pricing/mix increases.
Materials, Supplies, Labor and Other Production Costs (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately). The decrease as a percent of sales was primarily due to decreases
in ingredient costs and sales increases. These were partially offset by costs associated with the
manufacturing facility closure during the quarter, discussed in the Overview above, which impacted
costs $2.8 million, or 30 basis points as a percent of sales, net of operational savings.
The DSD segments decrease as a percent of sales was primarily the result of significant
decreases in ingredient costs, partially offset by costs associated with the manufacturing facility
closure during the quarter of $2.8 million, or 40 basis points as a percent of sales, net of operational savings.
The warehouse delivery segments increase as a percent of sales was primarily a result of
higher ingredient costs as a percent of sales. The higher ingredient costs were driven by
increases in sweeteners, palm oil and cocoa.
Selling, Distribution and Administrative Expenses. The increase as a percent of sales was due
to costs from closing the manufacturing facility which, net of operational savings, impacted it $2.4 million, or 30
basis points, as well as higher employee-related and distribution costs as a percent of sales.
Costs associated with the impending acquisition of Tasty affected selling, distribution and
administrative costs $0.8 million, or 10 basis points as a percentage of sales. These increases were partially offset by higher sales.
The DSD segments selling, distribution and administrative expenses increased as a percent of
sales primarily due to the manufacturing facility closure costs which, net of operational savings,
impacted it $2.4 million, or 40 basis points and higher employee-related and distribution costs as a percent of
sales.
The warehouse delivery segments selling, distribution and administrative expenses decreased
as a percent of sales primarily due to lower broker commissions as a percent of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to
increased depreciation expense related to capital expenditures subsequent to the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 and accelerated depreciation of certain assets at the closed facility.
The DSD segments depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due to assets
placed in service subsequent to the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and accelerated depreciation of
certain assets at the closed facility.
The warehouse delivery segments depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily due
to assets placed in service subsequent to the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Income From Operations. The increase in the DSD segments income from operations was primarily
attributable to lower ingredient costs, partially offset by the manufacturing facility closure
costs of $5.7 million, net of operational savings. The decrease in the warehouse delivery segments income from
operations was primarily a result of higher ingredient costs. The increase in unallocated corporate
expenses was primarily due to higher share-based payment expenses.
22
Table of Contents
Net Interest Income. The increase was related to lower interest expense on the term loan
because principal payments have been made quarterly since the fourth quarter of 2008. As this loan
is amortized through August 4, 2013, interest expense will decrease for the term loan. Lower
amounts outstanding under the companys unsecured credit facility also contributed to the increase.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was 35.0% compared
to 35.6% in the first quarter of the prior year. The decrease in the rate is due mainly to the
increase in the Section 199 qualifying production activities deduction in the current quarter
compared to the prior year quarter. The difference in the effective rate and the statutory rate is
primarily due to state income taxes and the Section 199 qualifying production activities deduction.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:
Liquidity represents our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities
to meet our obligations and commitments as well as our ability to obtain appropriate financing and
convert into cash those assets that are no longer required to meet existing strategic and financing
objectives. Therefore, liquidity cannot be considered separately from capital resources that
consist primarily of current and potentially available funds for use in achieving long-range
business objectives. Currently, the companys liquidity needs arise primarily from working capital
requirements, capital expenditures and stock repurchases. The companys strategy for use of its
cash flow includes paying dividends to shareholders, making acquisitions, growing internally and
repurchasing shares of its common stock when appropriate.
Cash Flows
Flowers Foods cash and cash equivalents increased to $8.7 million at April 23, 2011 from $6.8
million at January 1, 2011. The increase resulted from $72.6 million provided by operating
activities, offset by $26.0 million and $44.7 million disbursed for investing activities and
financing activities, respectively.
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash of $72.6 million provided by operating
activities during the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 consisted primarily of $41.2 million in
net income, adjusted for the following non-cash items (amounts in thousands):
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 27,992 | ||
Gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income |
(22,919 | ) | ||
Stock-based compensation |
5,929 | |||
Deferred income taxes |
(3,268 | ) | ||
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
410 | |||
Allowances for accounts receivable |
270 | |||
Pension and postretirement plans expense |
194 | |||
Other |
(644 | ) | ||
Total |
$ | 7,964 | ||
Cash provided by working capital and other activities was $23.4 million. As of April 23, 2011,
the company had $10.9 million recorded in other current liabilities representing collateral from
counterparties for hedged positions. As of January 1, 2011, the company had $11.5 million recorded
in other accrued liabilities representing collateral from counterparties for hedged positions.
Cash Flows Disbursed for Investing Activities. Net cash disbursed for investing activities
during the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 of $26.0 million consisted primarily of capital
expenditures of $22.1 million. Capital expenditures in the DSD segment and the warehouse delivery
segment were $17.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively. The company estimates capital
expenditures of approximately $90.0 million to $100.0 million during fiscal 2011. The company also
leases certain production machinery and equipment through various operating leases.
Cash Flows Disbursed for Financing Activities. Net cash disbursed for financing activities of
$44.7 million during the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011 consisted primarily of dividends paid
of $18.1 million, stock repurchases of $18.0 million, and net debt repayments of $7.5 million,
partially offset by proceeds of $1.0 million from the exercise of stock options and the share-based
payments income tax benefit of $0.6 million.
Credit Facility and Term Loan
Credit Facility. The company has a five-year, $250.0 million unsecured revolving loan facility
(the credit facility) that expires October 5, 2012. The company may request to increase its
borrowings under the credit facility up to an aggregate of $350.0 million upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions. Proceeds from the credit facility may be used for working capital and general
corporate purposes, including acquisition financing, refinancing of indebtedness and share
repurchases. The credit facility includes certain customary restrictions, which, among other
things, require maintenance of financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and creation of
indebtedness. Restrictive financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum interest coverage
ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The company
23
Table of Contents
believes that, given its current cash position, its
cash flow from operating activities and its available credit capacity, it can comply with the
current terms of the credit facility and can meet presently foreseeable financial requirements. As
of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the company was in compliance with all restrictive financial
covenants under its credit facility.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on any outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar
rate or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as the rate
offered in the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds
rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.00% to 0.30% for base rate loans and from 0.40%
to 1.275% for Eurodollar loans. In addition, a facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.35% is due
quarterly on all commitments under the credit facility. Both the interest margin and the facility
fee are based on the companys leverage ratio.
Amounts outstanding under the credit facility vary daily. Changes in the gross borrowings and
repayments can be caused by cash flow activity from operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
dividends, share repurchases, tax payments, as well as derivative transactions which are part of
the companys overall risk management strategy as discussed in Note 5, Derivative Financial
Instruments, of this Form 10-Q. For the sixteen weeks ended April 23, 2011, the company borrowed
$78.5 million in revolving borrowings and repaid $78.5 million in revolving borrowings under the
credit facility. There were no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility at April 23, 2011
or January 1, 2011.
Term Loan. On August 1, 2008, the company entered into a credit agreement (term loan) with
various lending parties for the purpose of completing acquisitions. The term loan provides for an
amortizing $150.0 million of borrowings through the maturity date of August 1, 2013. The term loan
includes certain customary restrictions, which, among other things, require maintenance of
financial covenants and limit encumbrance of assets and creation of indebtedness. Restrictive
financial covenants include such ratios as a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage
ratio. The company believes that, given its current cash position, its cash flow from operating
activities and its available credit capacity, it can comply with the current terms of the term loan
and can meet presently foreseeable financial requirements. As of April 23, 2011 and January 1,
2011, the company was in compliance with all restrictive financial covenants under the term loan.
As of April 23, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the amounts outstanding under the term loan were $108.8
million and $114.4 million, respectively.
Interest is due quarterly in arrears on outstanding borrowings at a customary Eurodollar rate
or the base rate plus the applicable margin. The underlying rate is defined as the rate offered in
the interbank Eurodollar market or the higher of the prime lending rate or federal funds rate plus
0.5%. The applicable margin ranges from 0.0% to 1.375% for base rate loans and from 0.875% to
2.375% for Eurodollar loans and is based on the companys leverage ratio. Principal payments began
on December 31, 2008 and are due quarterly under the term loan at an annual amortization of 10% of
the principal balance for each of the first two years, 15% during the third year, 20% during the
fourth year, and 45% during the fifth year. The company paid financing costs of $0.8 million in
connection with the term loan, which is being amortized over the life of the term loan.
Shelf registration. On February 8, 2011, the company filed a universal shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which will allow the
company to sell, from time to time, certain securities, including common stock, preferred stock,
debt securities and/or warrants, either individually or in units, in one or more offerings. The
company has no specific plans to offer the securities covered by the registration statement and is
not required to offer the securities in the future pursuant to the registration statement.
Currently, the companys credit ratings by Fitch Ratings, Moodys, and Standard & Poors are
BBB, Baa2, and BBB-, respectively. Changes in the companys credit ratings do not trigger a change
in the companys available borrowings or costs under the credit facility or term loan, but could
affect future credit availability.
Uses of Cash
On February 17, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.20 per share on the
companys common stock that was paid on March 17, 2011 to shareholders of record on March 3, 2011.
This dividend payment was $18.1 million.
24
Table of Contents
Our Board of Directors has approved a plan that authorizes share repurchases of up to 30.0
million shares of the companys common stock. Under the plan, the company may repurchase its common
stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions at such times and at such prices as
determined to be in the companys best interest. These purchases may be commenced or suspended
without prior notice depending on then-existing business or market conditions and other factors.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, 695,403 shares, at a cost of $18.0 million of the
companys common stock were purchased under the plan. From the inception of the plan through April
23, 2011, 24.9 million shares, at a cost of $422.2 million, have been purchased.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the company paid $18.8 million, including our share of employment taxes, in performance-based
cash awards under the companys bonus plan.
As discussed in the Overview above, the company expects to close on the Tasty acquisition
during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The total estimated cash payments for the acquisition
are approximately $165.0 million. We expect to use cash on hand as well as cash available under our credit facility to complete the transaction.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
The company uses derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage
market risk. The company uses forward, futures, swap and option contracts to hedge existing or
future exposure to changes in interest rates and commodity prices. The company does not enter into
these derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. If actual market
conditions are less favorable than those anticipated, raw material prices could increase
significantly, adversely affecting the margins from the sale of our products.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The company enters into commodity forward, futures and option contracts and swap agreements
for wheat and, to a lesser extent, other commodities in an effort to provide a predictable and
consistent commodity price and thereby reduce the impact of market volatility in its raw material
and packaging prices. As of April 23, 2011, the companys hedge portfolio contained commodity
derivatives with a fair value of $23.0 million. Of this fair value, $24.7 million is based on
quoted market prices and $(1.7) million is based on models and other valuation methods.
Approximately $18.8 million and $4.2 million of this fair value relates to instruments that will be
utilized in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, respectively.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to quantify the companys potential exposure to
commodity price risk with respect to the derivative portfolio. Based on the companys derivative
portfolio as of April 23, 2011, a hypothetical ten percent increase (decrease) in commodity prices
would increase (decrease) the fair value of the derivative portfolio by $20.5 million. The analysis
disregards changes in the exposures inherent in the underlying hedged items; however, the company
expects that any increase (decrease) in fair value of the portfolio would be substantially offset
by increases (decreases) in raw material and packaging prices.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The company entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $85.0 million, and $65.0
million, respectively, to fix the interest rate on the $150.0 million term loan secured on August
1, 2008 to fund the acquisitions of ButterKrust Bakery and Holsum Bakery, Inc. As of April 23,
2011, the fair value of these interest rate swaps was $(5.6) million. All of this fair value is
based on valuation models and $(2.6) million, $(2.5) million, and $(0.5) million of this fair value
is related to instruments expiring in 2011 through 2013, respectively.
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to quantify the companys potential exposure to
interest rate risk with respect to the interest rate swaps. As of April 23, 2011, a hypothetical
ten percent increase (decrease) in interest rates would increase (decrease) the fair value of the
interest rate swap by $0.1 million. The analysis disregards changes in the exposures inherent in
the underlying debt; however, the company expects that any increase (decrease) in payments under
the interest rate swap would be substantially offset by increases (decreases) in interest expense.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed to ensure that material information relating to the company, which is required to be
timely disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely fashion
and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SECs
rules and forms. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) was performed as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. This evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Accounting Officer (CAO). Based upon that
evaluation, our CEO, CFO and CAO have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
25
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our last fiscal quarter ended April 23, 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The company and its subsidiaries from time to time are parties to, or targets of, lawsuits,
claims, investigations and proceedings, which are being handled and defended in the ordinary course
of business. While the company is unable to predict the outcome of these matters, it believes,
based upon currently available facts, that it is remote that the ultimate resolution of any such
pending matters will have a material adverse effect on its overall financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows in the future. However, adverse developments could negatively impact
earnings in a particular future fiscal period.
On July 23, 2008, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company filed a lawsuit against Hostess
Brands, Inc. (Hostess) (formerly Interstate Bakeries Corporation) in the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaint alleges that Hostess is infringing upon
Flowers Natures Own trademarks by using or intending to use the Natures Pride trademark. Flowers
asserts that Hostess sale or intended sale of baked goods under the Natures Pride trademark is
likely to cause confusion with, and likely to dilute the distinctiveness of, the Natures Own mark
and constitutes unfair competition and deceptive trade practices. Flowers is seeking actual
damages, an accounting of Hostess profits from its sales of Natures Pride products, and
injunctive relief. Flowers sought summary judgment for its claims, which was denied by the court.
Unless our motion for reconsideration is granted and changes that ruling, we expect this case to
proceed to trial in 2011.
The companys facilities are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations
regarding the discharge of material into the environment and the protection of the environment in
other ways. The company is not a party to any material proceedings arising under these regulations.
The company believes that compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations will not
materially affect the consolidated financial condition or the competitive position of the company.
The company is currently in substantial compliance with all material environmental regulations
affecting the company and its properties.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Please refer to Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors, in the companys Form 10-K for the year ended
January 1, 2011 for information regarding factors that could affect the companys results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity. The following changes have been made to our Risk
Factor disclosures subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K.
Increases in employee and employee-related costs could have adverse effects on our profitability.
Pension, health care and workers compensation costs have been increasing and will likely
continue to increase. Any substantial increase in pension, health care or workers compensation
costs may have an adverse impact on our profitability. The company records pension costs and the
liabilities related to its benefit plans based on actuarial valuations, which include key
assumptions determined by management. Material changes in pension costs may occur in the future due
to changes in these assumptions. Future annual amounts could be impacted by various factors, such
as changes in the number of plan participants, changes in the discount rate, changes in the
expected long-term rate of return, changes in the level of contributions to the plan and other
factors.
In addition, legislation or regulations regarding areas such as labor and employment and
employee benefit plans (including employee health care benefits and costs) may impact our results
of operations.
We may be adversely impacted by the failure to execute acquisitions successfully.
The company from time to time undertakes acquisitions or divestitures. The success of any
acquisition or divestiture depends on the companys ability to identify opportunities that help us
meet our strategic objectives, consummate a transaction on favorable contractual terms and achieve
expected returns and other financial benefits. Acquisitions require us to efficiently integrate
the acquired business to achieve the expected returns. Divestitures present operational risks to
execute the transaction and may require impairment charges. Acquisition or divestiture
transactions present unique financial and operational risks, including diversion of management
attention from the existing core business, integrating or separating personnel and financial and
other systems, and adverse affects on exiting business relationships with suppliers and customers.
In situations where acquisitions or divestitures are not successfully implemented or completed, the
companys business or financial results could be negatively impacted.
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Our Board of Directors has approved a plan that authorizes share repurchases of up to 30.0
million shares of the companys common stock. Under the plan, the company may repurchase its common
stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions at such times and at such prices as
determined to be in the companys best interest. These purchases may be commenced or suspended
without prior notice depending on then-existing business or market conditions and other factors.
The following chart sets forth the amounts of our common stock purchased by the company during the
first quarter of fiscal 2011 under the stock repurchase plan.
Total Number of | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | as Part of | May Yet Be | ||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average Price | Publicly Announced | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Period | of Shares Purchased | Per Share | Plan or Programs | Plan or Programs | ||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except price data) |
||||||||||||||||
January 2, 2011 January 29, 2011 |
| | | 5,801 | ||||||||||||
January 30, 2011 February 26, 2011 |
60 | $ | 26.31 | 60 | 5,741 | |||||||||||
February 27, 2011 March 26, 2011 |
636 | $ | 25.89 | 636 | 5,105 | |||||||||||
March 27, 2011 April 23, 2011 |
| | | 5,105 | ||||||||||||
Total |
696 | $ | 25.93 | 696 | ||||||||||||
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits filed as part of this report are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FLOWERS FOODS, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ GEORGE E. DEESE | |||
Name: | George E. Deese | |||
Title: | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|||
By: | /s/ R. STEVE KINSEY | |||
Name: | R. Steve Kinsey | |||
Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||
By: | /s/ KARYL H. LAUDER | |||
Name: | Karyl H. Lauder | |||
Title: | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|||
Date: May 19, 2011
28
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
No | Name of Exhibit | |||
2.1
|
| Distribution Agreement by and between Flowers Industries, Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc., dated as of October 26, 2000 (Incorporated by
reference to Flowers Foods Registration Statement on Form 10, dated December 1, 2000, File No. 1-16247). |
||
2.2
|
| Amendment No. 1 to Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2001, between Flowers Industries, Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated
by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
||
3.1
|
| Restated Articles of Incorporation of Flowers Foods, Inc. as amended on May 30, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, dated June 4, 2009, File No. 1-16247). |
||
3.2
|
| Amended and Restated Bylaws of Flowers Foods, Inc., as amended and restated on November 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods
Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
||
4.1
|
| Share Certificate of Common Stock of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March
30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
||
4.2
|
| Form of Indenture (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Registration Statement on Form S-3, dated February 8, 2011, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.1
|
| Flowers Foods, Inc. Retirement Plan No. 1, as amended and restated effective March 26, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods
Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 30, 2001, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.2
|
| Flowers Foods, Inc. 2001 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of April 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Flowers Foods Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, dated April 24, 2009, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.3
|
| Flowers Foods, Inc. Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 29,
2002, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.4
|
| Flowers Foods, Inc. Annual Executive Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, dated April 24,
2009, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.5
|
| Flowers Foods, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated
March 29, 2002, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.6
|
| Form of Indemnification Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc., certain executive officers and the directors of Flowers Foods, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 28, 2003, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.7
|
| Form of Continuation of Employment Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive officers of Flowers Foods, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 4, 2009, File No. 1016247). |
||
10.8
|
| Ninth Amendment to the Flowers Foods, Inc. Retirement Plan No. 1, dated November 7, 2005, as amended and restated effective as of March 26,
2001 (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated November 17, 2005, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.9
|
| Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2006, among Flowers Foods, Inc., the Lenders Party
thereto from time to time, Bank of America N.A., Harris N.A. and Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleen
Bank, B.A., Rabsbank International, New York Branch, as co-documentation agents, Suntrust Bank, as
syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as administrative agent. (Incorporated by reference to
Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 7, 2006, File No. 1-16247).
|
||
10.10
|
| Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 23, 2008, by and among, Flowers Foods, Inc., Peachtree
Acquisition Co., LLC, Holsum Bakery, Inc., Lloyd Edward Eisele, Jr. and The Lloyd Edward Eisele,
Jr. Revocable Trust (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated
June 25, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.11
|
| Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2008, among Flowers Foods, Inc., the Lenders Party thereto
from time to time, Bank of America N.A., Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleen Bank, B.A.,
Rabobank International, New York Branch, and Branch Banking & Trust Company as co-documentation
agents, SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, and Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as
administrative agent (Incorporated by reference to Flowers
Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 2008, File No. 1-16247). |
29
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||||
No | Name of Exhibit | |||
10.12
|
| First Amendment and Waiver, dated October 5, 2007, among Flowers Foods, Inc., a Georgia
corporation, the lenders party to the Credit Agreement and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as
Administrative Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 11, 2007, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.13
|
| Form of 2009 Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain
executive officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual
Report on Form 10-K dated March 4, 2009, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.14
|
| Form of 2010 Restricted Stock Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive
officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form
10-K dated March 3, 2010, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.15
|
| Form of 2010 Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain
executive officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual
Report on Form 10-K dated March 3, 2010, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.16
|
| Form of 2010 Deferred Shares Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain members of
the Board of Directors of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual
Report on Form 10-K dated February 23, 2011, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.17
|
| Form of 2011 Restricted Stock Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain executive
officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual Report on Form
10-K dated February 23, 2011, File No. 1-16247). |
||
10.18
|
| Form of 2011 Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, by and between Flowers Foods, Inc. and certain
executive officers of Flowers Foods, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Flowers Foods Annual
Report on Form 10-K dated February 23, 2011, File No. 1-16247). |
||
*21
|
| Subsidiaries of Flowers Foods, Inc. |
||
*31.1
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
*31.2
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
*31.3
|
| Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
*32
|
| Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by George E. Deese, Chief Executive Officer, R. Steve Kinsey, Chief
Financial Officer and Karyl H. Lauder, Chief Accounting Officer for the Quarter Ended April 23,
2011. |
* | Filed herewith |
30