Fluent, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission file number 333-158336

IDI, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

2650 North Military Trail, Suite 300,

Boca Raton, Florida 33431

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(561) 757-4000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  YES    ¨  NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  YES    ¨  NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    YES  ¨    NO  x

As of November 16, 2015, the registrant had 15,603,286 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

IDI, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q

1

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Unless otherwise indicated or required by the context, all references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “we,” “us,” “our,” “IDI,” or the “Company” refer to IDI, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

All per share amounts and shares outstanding for all periods have been retroactively restated to reflect IDI’s 1-for-5 reverse stock split, which was effective on March 19, 2015.

IDI, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Table of Contents

IDI, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

IDI, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

IDI, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES AND ORGANIZATION

(a) Principal activities

IDI, Inc. (the “Company” or “IDI”), formerly known as Tiger Media, Inc., is a holding company and, through its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively the “Group”), is principally engaged in data analytics, serving as an information solutions provider to the risk management industry for purposes including due diligence, risk assessment, fraud detection and prevention, and authentication and verification. Further, IDI’s cross-functional core systems and processes are designed to deliver products and solutions to the marketing industry and to enable the public and private sectors to layer our solutions over their unique data sets, providing otherwise unattainable insight.

The Group was also engaged in the provision of advertising services in the out-of-home advertising industry in China. On June 30, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the plan to discontinue its Advertising Business (defined below). As of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business.

(b) Organization

Organization - Tiger Media, Inc.

On October 30, 2009, Tiger Media, Inc. (“Tiger Media”), formerly known as SearchMedia Holdings Limited (“SearchMedia Holdings”), completed the acquisition of all the issued and outstanding shares and warrants of SearchMedia International Limited (“SearchMedia International”). On December 14, 2012, SearchMedia Holdings changed its name to Tiger Media, Inc., a Cayman Islands exempted company.

Organization – TBO

The Best One, Inc. (“TBO”) is a holding company incorporated on September 22, 2014 in the State of Florida, which was formed to be engaged in the acquisition of operating businesses and the acquisition and development of valuable and proprietary technology assets across various industries. On October 2, 2014, TBO acquired 100% of the membership interests of Interactive Data, LLC (“Interactive Data”), a Georgia limited liability company and Interactive Data became a wholly-owned subsidiary of TBO. TBO accounted for the acquisition as a forward merger with TBO as both the legal and accounting acquirer. It was concluded that Interactive Data was not the predecessor accounting entity. Interactive Data is a data solutions provider, historically delivering data products and services to the Accounts Receivable Management (“ARM”) industry for location and identity verification, legislative compliance and debt recovery.

Organization – Acquisition of TBO

On March 21, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), Tiger Media and TBO Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tiger Media (“Merger Sub”), completed a merger (the “Merger”) with TBO, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”) dated as of December 14, 2014, by and among Tiger Media, Merger Sub, TBO, and Derek Dubner, solely in his capacity as representative of the TBO shareholders.

Before the Merger, on March 19, 2015, Tiger Media effected a one-for-five reverse stock split (the “Reverse Split”). The principal effect of the Reverse Split was to decrease the number of outstanding shares of each of Tiger Media’s ordinary shares. Except for de minimus adjustments for the treatment of fractional shares, the Reverse Split did not have any dilutive effect on Tiger Media shareholders and the relative voting and other rights that accompany the shares were not affected by the Reverse Split. In addition, the proportion of shares owned by shareholders relative to the number of shares authorized for issuance remained the same because the authorized number of shares were decreased in proportion to the Reverse Split from 1,000,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares. The authorized number of preferred shares were not affected by the Reverse Split and remain at 10,000,000 preferred shares. Also before the Merger, on March 20, 2015, Tiger Media completed its domestication from the Cayman Islands to Delaware as a Delaware corporation (the “Domestication”). Following the Domestication and the Reverse Split, on March 21, 2015, TBO merged into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tiger Media.

5

Table of Contents

On April 8, 2015, Merger Sub’s entity name was changed to IDI Holdings, LLC (“IDI Holdings”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On April 30, 2015, Tiger Media changed its name to IDI, Inc.

For accounting purposes, the Company recognized the Merger in accordance with ASC 805-40, Reverse Acquisitions. Accordingly, the Company has been recognized as the accounting acquiree in the Merger, with IDI Holdings being the accounting acquirer, and the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the reporting periods from January 1, 2015 through March 21, 2015 being those of IDI Holdings, rather than those of the Company. The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the periods since March 22, 2015, the day after which the Merger was consummated, recognize Tiger Media and IDI Holdings as a consolidated group for accounting and reporting purposes, albeit with a carryover capital structure inherited from Tiger Media (attributable to the legal structure of the transaction).

Organization – Disposal of Advertising Business

As a result of the Merger, and although it was the Company’s intention to continue to operate and further develop its Advertising Business (as defined below) both in China and the United States as of the Effective Date, on June 30, 2015, in connection with the continuing shift in IDI’s focus towards the data fusion industry via its consolidated subsidiaries, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan under which the Company discontinued the operations of its Chinese and British Virgin Islands based subsidiaries (collectively, the “Advertising Business”). The purpose of the plan is to focus the Company’s resources on the data fusion industry, where the Company believes the opportunities for future growth are substantially greater. Additionally, due to the continuing negative cash flow from operations of the Advertising Business, the Company elected not to invest further in this business. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business.

NOTE 2 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

As mentioned above, on June 30, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the plan to discontinue the Advertising Business. The Company recognized the transactions in accordance with ASC 205-20 Discontinued Operations. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business, by the disposal of its equity interests in the Advertising Business to an independent third party.

The following financial information presents the results of operations of the Advertising Business for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

6

Table of Contents

The Company recorded a gain on disposal of the Advertising Business of $376 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and a loss on disposal of the Advertising Business of $41,095 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the majority of which are non-cash charges, pursuant to the following:

All related assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale in relation to the discontinued operations have been disposed.

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Basis of preparation and liquidity

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows have been made. The results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and cash flows that may be reported for the remainder of 2015 or for future periods.

The Company reported net loss of $4,402 and $9,946 from continuing operations, net loss of $387 and $41,950 from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and net cash used in operating activities of $7,058 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $52,506.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant transactions among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated upon consolidation.

(b) Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the allowance for doubtful receivables; useful lives and residual values of property and equipment and intangible assets; recoverability of the carrying amount of property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets; fair values of financial instruments; and the assessment of contingent obligations. These estimates are often based on complex judgments and assumptions that management believes to be reasonable but are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

7

Table of Contents

(c) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and bank deposits with original maturities of three months or less, which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use.

The Group’s cash and bank deposits were held in major financial institutions located in the United States, which management believes have high credit ratings. The cash and bank deposits held in the United States, denominated in USD, amounted to $9,078 and $5,996 as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash investments. The Company places its temporary cash instruments with well-known financial institutions within the United States, and, at times, may maintain balances in United States banks in excess of the $250 thousand dollar US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit. The Company monitors the credit ratings of the financial institutions to mitigate this risk.

(d) Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are due from customers and are generally unsecured, which consist of amounts billed but not yet collected. None of the Group’s accounts receivable bear interest.

The allowance for doubtful accounts is management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Group’s existing accounts receivable. Management determines the allowance based on reviews of customer-specific facts and economic conditions. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Group does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

(e) Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation or amortization. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, and minor renewals are charged to expense in the period incurred. Betterments and additions are capitalized. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, taking into consideration the assets’ salvage or residual value. The estimated useful lives of property and equipment are as follows:

When items of property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, loss/income is charged or credited for the difference between the net book value and proceeds received thereon.

(f) Intangible assets other than goodwill

The Group’s intangible assets are amortized on a straight line basis over their respective estimated useful lives, which are the periods over which the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the Group. The Group’s intangible assets represent purchased intellectual property and related litigation costs, and capitalized software development costs, with estimated useful lives of 3-10 years.

In accordance with ASC 350-40 “Software — internal use software”, the Group capitalizes eligible costs, including salaries and staff benefits, share-based compensation expenses, traveling expenses incurred by relevant employees, and other relevant costs of developing internal-use software that are incurred in the application development stage when developing or obtaining software for internal use. The Company capitalized $2,321 during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, with $999 related to purchased intellectual property litigation costs and $1,322 related to internally developed software. The Company will begin the amortization of those costs when the products become commercially viable.

8

Table of Contents

(g) Goodwill

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired when accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. As of September 30, 2015, the goodwill balance relates to the October 2, 2014 acquisition of Interactive Data by TBO.

In accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other”, goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable, by assessing qualitative factors or performing a quantitative analysis in determining whether it is more likely than not that its fair value exceeds the carrying value.

(h) Impairment of long-lived assets

Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their respective useful lives and, along with other long-lived assets, are evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be recoverable in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. In evaluating long-lived assets for recoverability, including finite-lived intangibles and property and equipment, the Group uses its best estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and eventual disposition in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-15. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted cash inflows attributable to the asset, less estimated future undiscounted cash outflows, are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference between the carrying value of such asset and its fair value. Assets to be disposed of and for which there is a committed plan of disposal, whether through sale or abandonment, are reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.

Asset recoverability is an area involving management judgment, requiring assessment as to whether the carrying value of assets can be supported by the undiscounted future cash flows. In calculating the future cash flows, certain assumptions are required to be made in respect of highly uncertain matters such as revenue growth rates, gross margin percentages and terminal growth rates.

No impairment loss once recognized is subsequently reversed even if facts and circumstances indicate recovery.

(i) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market.

These tiers include:

The fair value of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities approximate their carrying amount because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

(j) Revenue recognition

The Company generally recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or a service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

9

Table of Contents

Revenue from data fusion operations is generally recognized on (a) a transactional basis determined by the customers’ usage, (b) a monthly fee or (c) a combination of both. Revenues pursuant to contracts containing a monthly fee are recognized ratably over the contract period, which is generally 1 year. Revenues pursuant to transactions determined by the customers’ usage are recognized when the transaction is complete. Costs associated with separately priced customer service contracts are generally recognized as follows: (a) costs are expensed as incurred; and (b) losses are recognized on contracts where the expected future costs exceed expected future revenue. No such loss contracts exist as of September 30, 2015.

Customer payments received in excess of the amount of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and are recognized as revenue when the services are rendered.

(k) Cost of revenues

Cost of revenues, related to data fusion operations, consist primarily of data acquisition and infrastructure costs.

(l) Advertising and promotion costs

Advertising and promotion costs are charged to operations as incurred. Advertising and promotion costs, included in sales and marketing expenses amounted to $52 and $140 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

(m) Share-based payments

The Group accounts for share-based payments to employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation”. Under ASC 718, the Group measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognizes the costs over the period the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which generally is the vesting period. For awards with performance conditions, the compensation expense is based on the grant-date fair value of the award, the number of shares ultimately expected to vest and the vesting period.

The Company accounts for share-based payments to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”. Under ASC 505-50, share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. In the event that the fair value of the equity instruments issued in a share-based payment transaction with nonemployees is more reliably measurable than the fair value of the consideration received, the transaction shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued by the Group.

(n) Income taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or laws is recognized in income in the period that the change in tax rates or laws is enacted. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Group applies ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”. ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation requires that an entity recognizes in the consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Group’s accounting policy is to accrue interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if and when required, as interest expense and a component of general and administrative expenses, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations.

10

Table of Contents

For the quarter ended September 30, 2015, management believes, due to recent losses, that it is now more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and has therefore there was no deferred tax assets recognized during this period.

(o) Loss per share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares and is calculated using the treasury stock method for stock options and unvested shares. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the calculation in the loss periods as their effects would be anti-dilutive.

On March 19, 2015, the Company effected the Reverse Split. The principal effect of the Reverse Split was to decrease the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common shares. All per share amounts and shares outstanding for all the periods presented have been retroactively restated to reflect the Reverse Split.

(p) Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to loss contingencies that cover a wide range of matters. An estimated loss from a loss contingency such as a legal proceeding or claim is accrued if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In determining whether a loss should be accrued, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the degree of probability and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss.

(q) Segment reporting

The Group has one operating segment, the data fusion operations, as defined by ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”. On June 30, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the plan to discontinue the Advertising Business, which was accounted for as discontinued operations, and as of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business.

(r) Significant concentrations and risks

Concentration of Credit Risk

Assets that potentially subject the Group to significant concentration of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, all of the Group’s cash and cash equivalents were deposited in financial institutions located in the United States, which management believes are of high credit quality. Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenue earned from customers. The risk with respect to accounts receivable is mitigated by credit evaluations the Group performs on its customers and its ongoing monitoring process of outstanding balances.

Concentration of Customers

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Group recognized revenue from one major customer, accounting for 17% of the total revenue from data fusion operations.

As of September 30, 2015, one customer accounted for 21% of the Group’s accounts receivable.

Concentration of Suppliers

Two data suppliers accounted for 36% and 23% of the total data purchases during the three months ended September 30, 2015. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Group’s purchases from these data suppliers accounted for 28% and 30% of the total data purchases.

As of September 30, 2015, two data suppliers accounted for 39% and 31% of the Group’s accounts payable.

11

Table of Contents

(s) Recently issued accounting standards

In May 2014, FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under previous guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligations. On July 9, 2015, FASB approved the proposal to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date of December 15, 2016, and the standard is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01 (“ASU 2015-01”), “Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items”. This ASU eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Reporting entities will not have to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2015-01 no later than the quarter beginning January 1, 2016 and does not expect that this ASU will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02 (“ASU 2015-02”), “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”. ASU 2015-02 changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We do not expect that this ASU will have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

Except for the ASUs above, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, FASB has issued ASUs No. 2015-01 through ASU No. 2015-16, which are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 4 – SEGMENT

We currently manage our operations in one reportable segment, data fusion operations. On June 30, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the plan to discontinue its Advertising Business, and as of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business.

12

Table of Contents

Information regarding our data fusion operations, Advertising Business and the unallocated corporate operations as well as geographic information are as follows:

Information regarding assets for our operating segment and the unallocated corporate operations are as follows as at September 30, 2015:

As of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business.

NOTE 5 – LOSS PER SHARE

The information related to basic and diluted loss per share is as follows:

13

Table of Contents

NOTE 6 - ACQUISITION

As specified in Note 1(b) – Organization, on March 21, 2015, the Effective Date, Tiger Media, Inc. and the Merger Sub, completed the Merger with TBO, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement.

For accounting purposes, the Company recognized the Merger in accordance with ASC 805-40, Reverse Acquisitions. Accordingly, the Company has been recognized as the accounting acquiree in relation to the Merger, with IDI Holdings being the accounting acquirer, and the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through March 21, 2015 being those of IDI Holdings, rather than those of the Company. The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period since March 22, 2015, the day after which the Merger was consummated, recognize Tiger Media and IDI Holdings as a consolidated group for accounting and reporting purposes, albeit with a carryover capital structure inherited from Tiger Media (attributable to the legal structure of the transaction).

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets (including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities of Tiger Media prior to the Merger as of the Effective Date were recorded at their respective fair values and added to those of IDI Holdings. Any excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net assets were recorded as goodwill. Financial statements of IDI issued after the Merger would reflect these fair values and would not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of Tiger Media.

Under the reverse acquisition, the accounting acquiree, the Company, issued equity shares to the owners of the accounting acquirer, IDI Holdings. The consideration transferred by IDI Holdings for its interest in the Company is based on the number of equity interests IDI Holdings would have had to issue to give the owners of the Company the same percentage equity interest in the combined entity that results from the reverse acquisition. The fair value of the number of equity interests calculated in that way can be used as the fair value of consideration transferred in exchange for the Company. Certain shareholders of IDI Holdings also have the right to receive additional shares subject to an earn-out (as mentioned in Note (11) below). There was no accounting impact as a result of the earn-out consideration. The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation and the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed (marked to market), and the resulting amount of goodwill in the acquisition of Tiger Media (the accounting acquiree) at the Effective Date.

Goodwill from the acquisition principally relates to the assembled workforce and the synergy effects.

14

Table of Contents

As all assets and liabilities related to the Advertising Business have been disposed as of September 30, 2015, no pro forma financial information was disclosed for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

NOTE 7 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

Accounts receivable consist of the following:

NOTE 8 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

NOTE 9 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment, net consist of the following:

Depreciation of property and equipment of $45 and $93 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, were allocated to operating expenses.

15

Table of Contents

NOTE 10 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Intangible assets other than goodwill consist of the following:

The amounts associated with intangible assets were mainly related to the intellectual property purchased by TBO from Ole Poulsen (“Purchased IP”) pursuant to the Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement dated October 14, 2014 (“IP Agreement”) and related legal and other costs incurred in defending the Company’s claims to the Purchased IP, and capitalized costs of internally developed software. Amortization expenses of $12 and $40 were included in operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

Estimated amortization expenses related to the Company’s intangible assets for the remainder of 2015 through 2019 and thereafter are $14, $56, $56, $56, $56, and $474, respectively.

NOTE 11 – COMMON SHARES AND WARRANTS

Upon completion of the Merger on March 21, 2015, TBO stockholders were entitled to receive the following (all reflect the 1-for-5 Reverse Split):

Marlin Capital Investments, LLC (“Marlin Capital”), a company which Michael Brauser, our Executive Chairman, owns 50% and is one of two managers, held RSUs representing the right to receive 2,000,000 shares of TBO Common Stock. The Company assumed these RSUs upon closing of the Merger and the RSUs represent the right to receive 2,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock. The RSUs vest annually beginning from October 13, 2015 only if certain performance goals of the Company are met. The shares underlying such RSUs will not be delivered until October 13, 2018, unless there is a change of control of the Company.

16

Table of Contents

In addition, 960,000 RSUs held by TBO employees were assumed by the Company and represent the right to receive 960,000 shares of Company Common Stock, subject to vesting and delivery. 28,000 outstanding TBO warrants were assumed upon the Merger and are exercisable for 28,000 shares of Company Common Stock. In June 2015, 20,122 shares of Company Common Stock were issued as a result of a cashless exercise of the 28,000 warrants.

As stated in Note 1(b), for accounting purposes, the Company has been recognized as the accounting acquiree in the Merger described above, with IDI Holdings being the accounting acquirer. Therefore, the equity structure prior to March 21, 2015 was restated to reflect the number of common shares and preferred shares of the Company issued to TBO shareholders to effect the transaction using the exchange ratio prescribed by the Merger Agreement.

Common shares

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the number of issued and outstanding common shares was 15,603,286 and 6,597,155, respectively. The change of number of common shares during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was as a result of issuance of the following common shares:

Warrants

Pursuant to a concurrent private placement with the Securities Purchase Agreement, as mentioned above, the Company issued to the investor warrants to purchase 0.5 share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased in the registered direct offering at an exercise price of $10.00 per share, for a total of 640,205 shares of common stock. The warrants will be exercisable six months from the date of issuance and will expire 36 months from the date of issuance.

Preferred shares

As of September 30, 2015, as part of the Merger, the Company issued a total of 4,965,302 shares of Company Preferred Shares to TBO shareholders. An additional 1,800,220 shares of Company Preferred Stock may be issued subject to an earn-out. Terms of the Company Preferred Shares are as follows:

Conversion. The Company Preferred Stock will automatically convert on a one-for-one basis into Company Common Stock immediately before the closing of a qualified sale. The Certificate of Designation of the Company Preferred Stock defines qualified sale as the bona fide, arms’ length sale of Company Preferred Stock to a non-affiliate of either the holder or the Company.

Dividends. Each holder of Company Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive dividends in the same manner as holders of Company Common Stock, at the same time any dividends or other distributions will be paid or declared and set apart for payment on any shares of Company Common Stock, on the basis of the largest number of whole shares of Company Common Stock into which such holder’s shares of Company Preferred Stock could be converted.

Voting Rights. Except as required by law, holders of Company Preferred Stock will not be entitled to vote, but each holder will be entitled, on the same basis as a holder of Company Common Stock, to receive notice of an action or meeting. In addition, holders of any series of preferred stock will be entitled to vote on any changes to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation that would modify the designations of such series of preferred stock.

Dissolution, Liquidation or Winding Up. In connection with a dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the Company, distributions to the stockholders of the Company shall be made among the holders of Company Common Stock, Company Preferred Stock and any other class or series of preferred stock entitled to participate with the Common Stock in a liquidating distribution pro rata in proportion to the shares of Company Common Stock then held by them and the maximum number of shares of Company Common Stock which they would have the right to acquire upon conversion of shares of Company Preferred Stock held by them.

17

Table of Contents

No Preemptive or Redemption Rights. The Company Preferred Stock has no preemptive or redemption rights.

NOTE 12 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

As of September 30, 2015, the Company maintains two share-based incentive plans. On January 1, 2008, the 2008 Share Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) was approved by the board of directors and shareholders of SearchMedia International with respect to the granting of up to 359,299 share options and restricted share units. The number of authorized shares to be awarded under the 2008 Plan was increased to 600,000 following board approval in August 2010 and subsequent shareholder approval in September 2011, to 900,000 shares in December 2012 and 1.2 million shares in December 2013. On April 27, 2015, the Board approved the IDI, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which was subsequently approved during the annual shareholder meeting on June 2, 2015, covering the issuance of 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units. The primary purpose of the 2015 Plan is to attract, retain, reward and motivate certain individuals by providing them with an opportunity to acquire or increase a proprietary interest in IDI and to incentivize them to expend maximum effort for the growth and success of the Company, so as to strengthen the mutuality of the interests between such individuals and the stockholders of the Company.

As of September 30, 2015, there were 10,568 and 1,053,500 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2008 Plan and the 2015 Plan, respectively.

In addition, as mentioned in Note (11) above, outside of the 2008 Plan and 2015 Plan, Marlin Capital held RSUs representing the right to receive 2,000,000 shares of TBO Common Stock, which was assumed by the Company upon closing of the Merger and the RSUs represent the right to receive 2,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock. The RSUs vest annually beginning from October 13, 2015 only if certain performance goals of the Company are met. The shares underlying such RSUs will not be delivered until October 13, 2018, unless there is a change of control of the Company. 960,000 RSUs held by TBO employees, including the Company’s Co-CEO and President, were also assumed by the Company and represent the right to receive 960,000 shares of Company Common Stock, subject to vesting and delivery.

Share options

Pursuant to the 2015 Plan, on June 23, 2015, a total of 25,000 share options were granted to an employee with a vesting period of 4 years.

Compensation expense recognized from employee stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $15 and $35, respectively, which was recognized in general and administrative expenses and discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2015, unrecognized share-based compensation cost in respect of granted share options amounted to $57.

We estimate the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing formula, applying the following assumptions, and amortize the fair value to expense over the option’s vesting period using the straight-line attribution approach for employees and non-employee directors:

Restricted share units

Details of restricted share unit activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were as follows:

18

Table of Contents

The Group recognized compensation cost (included in general and administrative expenses and discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, and intangible assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets) for these restricted share units of $1,548 and $4,091 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The fair value of the restricted share units was estimated using the market value of the common shares on the date of grant, which was equivalent to the closing price of one share of our common stock on the grant date.

As of September 30, 2015, unrecognized share-based compensation cost in respect of granted restricted share units amounted to $13,612 that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.44 years.

NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(a) Related party transactions

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, material related party transactions were as follows:

Interest in the Merger — Frost Gamma Investments Trust

Before the Merger, but after giving effect to the Reverse Split, Frost Gamma Investments Trust (“Frost Gamma”), an affiliate of Phillip Frost, M.D., owned 2,144,275 shares of IDI, representing 29.4% of the IDI’s outstanding ordinary shares. In addition, at the Effective Time, after giving effect to a TBO recapitalization, Frost Gamma owned 80,000 shares of TBO Common Stock, 640,000 shares of TBO Series C Preferred Stock, and 4,000 shares of TBO Series D Preferred Stock, which resulted in IDI issuing to Frost Gamma 2,660,309 shares of Company Common Stock at closing, and an additional 900,108 shares of Company Common Stock subject to an earn out. As a result, following the Merger, Frost Gamma owned 34.6% of Company Common Stock at closing and 38.6% of Company Common Stock assuming the Common Earn Out Shares are earned. In connection with approving the Merger and the related transactions, the Board of IDI and its Audit Committee reviewed and considered Frost Gamma’s interest in such transactions.

Employment Agreement — Derek Dubner

On October 2, 2014, TBO entered into an employment agreement with Derek Dubner (as amended, the “Dubner Employment Agreement”), which was assumed by IDI in the Merger. Mr. Dubner currently earns an annual base salary of $264, as adjusted. Dubner’s Employment Agreement continues through September 30, 2016, unless terminated sooner. If Mr. Dubner’s employment is terminated by IDI without cause as defined in the Dubner Employment Agreement or by Mr. Dubner for good reason, Mr. Dubner is entitled to a severance in the amount equal to his base salary for the remainder of the term. The definition of “good reason” includes a material diminution in his overall responsibilities, a reduction in his compensation without his prior written consent, a request by IDI encouraging Mr. Dubner to participate in an unlawful act, and IDI’s breach of a material term of the Dubner Employment Agreement.

Under the Dubner Employment Agreement, Mr. Dubner received a bonus of $100 as a result of the Merger, and received an additional bonus of $150 as a result of raising $10.0 million in a financing following the Merger. Additionally, Mr. Dubner received 400,000 RSUs, vesting quarterly during the term of the agreement, and immediately upon a Company Sale, as that term is defined in the Dubner Employment Agreement, of IDI. Mr. Dubner’s RSUs represent Mr. Dubner’s right to receive 400,000 shares of IDI Common Stock.

19

Table of Contents

IDI may terminate the Dubner Employment Agreement if there is an adverse ruling against Mr. Dubner pursuant to an action brought on by TransUnion alleging Mr. Dubner’s employment with IDI is a breach of Mr. Dubner’s confidentiality and/or other legal or fiduciary obligations to TransUnion or TLO, provided that IDI pay Mr. Dubner his base salary for the remainder of his term. IDI also agreed to indemnify Mr. Dubner against expenses incurred in connection with such an action.

Employment Agreement — James Reilly

On October 2, 2014, TBO entered into an employment agreement with James Reilly (as amended, the “Reilly Employment Agreement”), which was assumed by IDI in the Merger. Mr. Reilly earns an annual base salary of $264, as adjusted. Reilly’s Employment Agreement continues through September 30, 2016, unless terminated sooner. If Mr. Reilly’s employment is terminated by IDI without cause as defined in the Reilly Employment Agreement or by Mr. Reilly for good reason, Mr. Reilly is entitled to a severance in the amount equal to his base salary for the remainder of the term. The definition of “good reason” includes a material diminution in his overall responsibilities, a reduction in his compensation without his prior written consent, a request by IDI encouraging Mr. Reilly to participate in an unlawful act, and IDI’s breach of a material term of the Reilly Employment Agreement.

Under the Reilly Employment Agreement, Mr. Reilly received a bonus of $100 as a result of the Merger. Additionally, Mr. Reilly received 200,000 RSUs, vesting quarterly during the term of the agreement, and immediately upon a Company Sale, as that term is defined in the Reilly Employment Agreement, of IDI. Mr. Reilly’s RSUs represent Mr. Reilly’s right to receive 200,000 shares of IDI Common Stock.

IDI may terminate the Reilly Employment Agreement if there is an adverse ruling against Mr. Reilly pursuant to an action brought on by TransUnion alleging Mr. Reilly’s employment with IDI is a breach of Mr. Reilly’s confidentiality and noncompetition agreement with TLO, which was purportedly subsequently assumed by TransUnion, provided that IDI pay Mr. Reilly his base salary for the remainder of his term. IDI also agreed to indemnify Mr. Reilly against expenses incurred in connection with such an action.

Business Consulting Agreement — Marlin Capital Investments, LLC

On October 13, 2014, TBO entered into a business consulting services agreement with Marlin Capital for a term of four (4) years (the “Marlin Consulting Agreement”). Michael Brauser, the Company’s Executive Chairman, is a 50% owner and one of two managers of Marlin Capital. Under the Marlin Consulting Agreement, Marlin Capital serves in the capacity of a strategic advisor to TBO and provides services such as recommendations on organizational structure, capital structure, future financing needs, and business strategy. The Marlin Consulting Agreement provides for equity compensation issued to Marlin in the amount of 2,000,000 RSUs of TBO. IDI assumed these RSUs in the Merger and the RSUs represent the right to receive 2,000,000 shares of IDI common stock. The RSUs vest on four equal annual installments beginning October 13, 2015 only if certain performance goals of IDI are met. The shares underlying such RSUs will not be delivered until October 13, 2018, unless there is a change of control of IDI.

Consulting Agreement — DAB Management Group Inc.

Effective on August 1, 2015, IDI entered into a consulting agreement with DAB Management Group Inc. (“DAB”) for DAB to provide consulting services related to business development, future acquisition and strategic transactions for a term of six months, and shall automatically renew for additional six-month periods, unless either party provides written notice to the other of its intent not to renew not fewer than 30 days prior to the expiration of the then current term (the “DAB Agreement”). DAB is owned by Daniel Brauser, one of the Company’s directors. Under the DAB Agreement, the consulting service fee is $20 per month.

Other

Beginning in June 2015, the Company began paying monthly rental payments of $5 on behalf of Grander Holdings, Inc, an entity owned by the Company’s Executive Chairman, for a portion of its office lease at 4400 Biscayne Blvd, Miami, Florida 33137, to Frost Real Estate Holdings, LLC, an entity controlled by Dr. Phillip Frost, a significant shareholder in the Company. The office is occupied by the Company’s Executive Chairman, as well as corporate and administrative personnel to conduct the Company-related business.

20

Table of Contents

(b) Amounts due to related parties

Notes:

NOTE 14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(a) Operating lease commitments

As of September 30, 2015, future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases having initial or remaining lease terms of more than one year are as follows:

(b) Capital commitment

As of September 30, 2015, material capital commitments under non-cancellable data licensing agreements were $13,350, shown as follows:

(c) Contingency

Our legal proceedings are disclosed in Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings. The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceeding, investigation or claim which, in the opinion of the management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations. Accordingly, no provision was made for any claims as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Legal fees associated with such legal proceedings, as disclosed in Part II, Item 1, are expensed as incurred, or capitalized as discussed in Note 10.

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events and transactions after September 30, 2015 through the date these financial statements were issued. The following material matters have occurred through November 16, 2015.

In October 2015, the Company entered into a Non-Exclusive Aircraft Dry Lease Agreement with Brauser Aviation, LLC, an affiliated entity of our Executive Chairman, to pay a set hourly rate for Company-related usage of the aircraft.

21

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Executive Overview

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”), about our expectations, beliefs, or intentions regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies, the outcome of litigation, or prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends, or results as of the date they are made. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the disclosures made in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed on April 15, 2015, and other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law. We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provisions of PSLRA. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and reflect our views as of the date they are made with respect to future events and financial performance.

IDI, Inc. (the “Company” or “IDI”), formerly known as Tiger Media, Inc. (“Tiger Media”), is a holding company incorporated in the State of Delaware. Through its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively the “Group”), IDI’s principal focus is in data analytics, serving as an information solutions provider to the risk management industry for purposes including due diligence, risk assessment, fraud detection and prevention, and authentication and verification. Further, IDI’s cross-functional core systems and processes are designed to deliver products and solutions to the marketing industry and to enable the public and private sectors to layer our solutions over their unique data sets, providing otherwise unattainable insight.

On March 21, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), Tiger Media and TBO Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tiger Media (“Merger Sub”), completed a merger (the “Merger”) with The Best One, Inc. (“TBO”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, as amended (the “Merger Agreement”). TBO is a holding company that is engaged in the acquisition of operating businesses and the acquisition and development of valuable and proprietary technology assets across various industries. On October 2, 2014, TBO acquired 100% of the membership interests of Interactive Data, LLC (“Interactive Data”). TBO accounted for the acquisition as a forward merger with TBO as both the legal and accounting acquirer.

Historically, Interactive Data has provided data solutions and services to the Accounts Receivable Management industry for location and identity verification, legislative compliance and debt recovery. Interactive Data is now targeting the entirety of the risk management industry, including expansion into Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) regulated data and non-regulated data. Through proprietary linking technology, advanced systems architecture, and a massive data repository, Interactive Data will address the rapidly growing need for actionable intelligence.

Before the Merger, on March 19, 2015, Tiger Media effected a one-for-five reverse stock split (the “Reverse Split”). The principal effect of the Reverse Split was to decrease the number of outstanding shares of each of Tiger Media’s ordinary shares. Except for de minimus adjustments for the treatment of fractional shares, the Reverse Split did not have any dilutive effect on Tiger Media shareholders and the relative voting and other rights that accompany the shares were not affected by the Reverse Split. In addition, the proportion of shares owned by shareholders relative to the number of shares authorized for issuance remained the same because the authorized number of shares were decreased in proportion to the Reverse Split from 1,000,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares. The authorized number of preferred shares were not affected by the Reverse Split and remain at 10,000,000 preferred shares. Also before the Merger, on March 20, 2015, Tiger Media completed its domestication from the Cayman Islands to Delaware as a Delaware corporation (the “Domestication”). Following the Domestication and the Reverse Split, on the Effective Date, TBO merged into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tiger Media.

22

Table of Contents

On April 8, 2015, Merger Sub’s entity name was changed to IDI Holdings, LLC (“IDI Holdings”), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On April 30, 2015, Tiger Media changed its name to IDI, Inc.

For accounting purposes, the Company recognized the Merger in accordance with ASC 805-40, Reverse Acquisitions. Accordingly, the Company has been recognized as the accounting acquiree in the Merger, with IDI Holdings being the accounting acquirer, and the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the reporting periods from January 1, 2015 through March 21, 2015 being those of IDI Holdings, not Tiger Media. The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the periods since March 22, 2015, the day after which the Merger was consummated, recognize Tiger Media and IDI Holdings as a consolidated group for accounting and reporting purposes, albeit with a carryover capital structure inherited from Tiger Media (attributable to the legal structure of the transaction).

As a result of the Merger, and although it was the Company’s intention to continue to operate and further develop its Advertising Business (as defined below) both in China and the United States as of the Effective Date, on June 30, 2015, in connection with the continuing shift in IDI’s focus towards the data fusion industry, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan under which the Company discontinued the operations of its Chinese- and British Virgin Islands-based subsidiaries (collectively, the “Advertising Business”). The Advertising Business focused primarily on the out-of-home advertising industry in China. Out-of-home advertising typically referred to advertising media in public places, such as billboards and screen displays. The purpose of the plan is to focus the Company’s resources on the data fusion industry, where the Company believes the opportunities for future growth are substantially greater. Additionally, due to the continuing negative cash flow from operations of the Advertising Business, the Company elected not to invest further in this business. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has disposed of all assets and liabilities related to its Advertising Business.

Our principal executive offices are located at 2650 North Military Trail, Suite 300, Boca Raton, Florida 33431 and our telephone number is (561) 757-4000. Our Internet website address is www.ididata.com. The Internet website address provided in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not intended to function as a hyperlink and information obtained at the address is not and should not be considered part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is not incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In support of the development and commercialization of the Company’s primary investigative system, idiCORE^™, the Company continues to build out its cloud-based infrastructure, aggregate and ingest massive data sets, and onboard customers in anticipation of the launch of idiCORE.

In order for the Company to continue to develop new products, grow its existing business and expand into additional markets, it must generate and sustain sufficient operating profits and cash flow in future periods. This will require the Company to generate additional sales from current products and new products currently under development. Interactive Data has begun building out its sales organization to drive current products and to introduce new products into the market place. The Company will incur increased compensation expenses for its sales and marketing, executive and administrative, and infrastructure related persons as it increases headcount in the next 12 months.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon IDI’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires IDI to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, IDI evaluates its estimates, including those related to bad debts, income taxes, and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies govern our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

We generally recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or a service has been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

23

Table of Contents

Revenue from data fusion operations is generally recognized on (a) a transactional basis determined by the customers’ usage, (b) a monthly fee or (c) a combination of both. Revenues pursuant to contracts containing a monthly fee are generally recognized ratably over the contract period, which is generally 1 year. Revenues pursuant to transactions determined by the customers’ usage are recognized when the transaction is complete. Costs associated with separately priced customer service contracts are generally recognized as follows: (a) costs are expensed as incurred; and (b) losses are recognized on contracts where the expected future costs exceed expected future revenue. No such loss contracts exist as of September 30, 2015.

Customer payments received in excess of the amount of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets, and are recognized as revenue when the services are rendered. As of September 30, 2015, deferred revenue totaled $150, all of which all is expected to be realized in 2015 and 2016.

The Group sells its products or provides services, generally on credit, to a limited number of customers. The Group’s normal payment terms offered to customers, distributors and resellers are due upon receipt. Rarely does the Group extend payment terms beyond their normal terms.

Allowances for Doubtful Accounts

The Group maintains allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Management determines whether an allowance needs to be provided for an amount due from a customer depending on the aging of the individual balances receivable, recent payment history, contractual terms and other qualitative factors such as status of business relationship with the customer. Historically, the Group’s estimates for doubtful accounts have not differed materially from actual results. As at September 30, 2015, based on management’s assessment, an allowance in the amount of $68 for uncollectible accounts receivable was recorded.

Income Taxes

The Group follows ASC subtopic 740-10 for recording the provision for income taxes. ASC 740-10 requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

The Group assesses its income tax positions based on management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. The Group uses a more likely than not threshold when making its assessment as to financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position. Any state minimum or franchise taxes due are generally expensed as incurred. The Group recognizes income tax interest and penalties as a separately identified component of general and administrative expense.

Results of operations

For accounting purposes, IDI Holdings was the accounting acquirer, and acquired Tiger Media on March 21, 2015. As such only results of operations during the period from March 22, 2015 to September 30, 2015 of Tiger Media were included into the condensed consolidated financial statements of IDI for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. As a result of the Board of Directors decision to discontinue the Advertising Business on June 30, 2015 and the disposal of all assets and liabilities related to the Advertising Business as of September 30, 2015, the operating results of the Advertising Business for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was reflected as Discontinued Operations.

24

Table of Contents

In addition, as IDI Holdings was formed on September 22, 2014, and the comparative figures during the corresponding periods in 2014 were all not material, no comparison was discussed below.

Revenue from data fusion operations. The Group’s revenue from data fusion operations was $1.0 million and $3.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Group expects its revenue from data fusion operations to increase in the future as it expands the sales organization, penetrates additional markets and releases new products.

Gross profit. The Group’s gross profit was 24% and 46% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue from data fusion operations is impacted by several factors, including increase in transactional-based data costs, timing and acquisition of flat-fee data licensing agreements, the mix of such data costs, changes in channels of distribution, sales volume, pricing strategies, and fluctuations in sales of integrated third-party products.

Sales and marketing expenses. The Group’s sales and marketing expenses were $0.5 million and $1.5 million or 52% and 47% of revenue from data fusion operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses consist of marketing and promotion, salaries and benefits, traveling expenses, transportation and expenses incurred by our selling and distribution team, which are expected to increase in the future following the growth of revenue and the Company’s efforts to expand its sales organization.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were $4.2 million and $9.8 million for three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, which mainly consisted of non-cash share-based compensation expenses of $1.5 million and $3.4 million, professional fees of $1.7 million and $3.6 million, and employee salaries and benefits of $0.6 million and $1.6 million, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Included in the professional fees, there were non-recurring fees of $0.2 million related to the review of potential strategic acquisitions for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and $0.3 million related to the Merger for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Net loss from continuing operations. As a result of the foregoing, we had a loss of $4.4 million and $9.9 million, including $1.5 million and $3.4 million of non-cash share-based compensation expenses, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 from continuing operations, respectively.

Net loss from discontinued operations. As a result of the disposal of all assets and liabilities related to the Advertising Business, a net loss of $0.4 million and $42.0 million were recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 mainly includes non-cash loss on disposal of the discontinued operations of $41.1 million. The loss on disposal mainly includes the write-offs of goodwill, intangible assets and long-term deferred assets, employee compensation expenses and lease agreements early termination compensation expenses.

Net loss. A net loss of $4.8 million and $51.9 million was recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, as a result of the foregoing.

Liquidity and capital resources

As at September 30, 2015, the Group had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $9.1 million. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $7.1 million, due to the net loss incurred during the period, which reflected expenses related to sales and marketing, and general and administrative activities.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $0.7 million, as a result of the acquisition of Tiger Media, the accounting acquiree, on March 21, 2015, which was offset by the payments for the Purchased IP litigation costs, software developed for internal use, and property and equipment.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $9.4 million, net of offering costs, as a result of a registered direct offering, in which the Company sold 1,280,410 shares of its common stock at a per share price of $7.81 to an institutional investor, pursuant to the definitive purchase agreement reached on July 24, 2015.

On September 30, 2015, the Group had non-cancellable operating lease commitments of $1.7 million, and material commitments under non-cancellable data licensing agreements of $13.4 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Group funded its operations through the use of available cash.

25

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2014, the Group had available cash of approximately $6.0 million, while as of September 30, 2015, the Group had cash of approximately $9.1 million, with an increase of $3.1 million. Based on projections of growth in revenue from data fusion operations and operating results in the coming quarters, the Group believes that we will have sufficient cash resources to finance our operations and expected capital expenditures for the next twelve months. Subject to revenue growth, IDI may have to continue to raise private equity and/or debt, which, if we are able to obtain, will have the effect of diluting common and preferred stockholders. Any equity or debt financings, if available at all, may be on terms which are not favorable to IDI. If IDI’s operations do not generate positive cash flow in the upcoming year, or if it is not able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on terms and conditions acceptable to it, if at all, it may be unable to implement its business plan, or even continue its operations.

The Group may explore the possible acquisition of businesses, products and technologies that are complementary to its existing business. The Group is continuing to identify and prioritize additional technologies, which we may wish to develop internally or through licensing or acquisition from third parties. While the Group may engage from time to time in discussions with respect to potential acquisitions, there can be no assurances that any such acquisitions will be made or that we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired business. In order to finance such acquisitions and working capital, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds through public or private financings. Any equity or debt financings, if available at all, may be on terms, which are not favorable to us and, in the case of equity financings, may result in dilution to stockholders.

Contractual obligations

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Group did not have any material changes outside the ordinary course of the Group’s business in contractual obligations.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

As of September 30, 2015, the Group did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)4(ii) of Regulation S-K.

As a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to include information otherwise required by this Item.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2015. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2015, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of such a date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the last quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

26

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

We may be involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations, and the Company is rigorously defending these matters. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty and we cannot assure you that the ultimate resolution of any legal or administrative proceeding or dispute will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

On October 27, 2014, TransUnion Risk and Alternative Data Solutions, Inc. (“TRADS”) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Interactive Data, among other parties, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, regarding a dispute over ownership of the Purchased IP. TRADS has since dropped Interactive Data as a party, and added TBO and Ole Poulsen, the Company’s Chief Science Officer. On June 10, 2015, over TRADS’ objections, the court granted TBO’s motion to expand the scope of discovery to include, among other things, whether TRADS is a good faith purchaser of any of the Purchased IP, free of any fraud or misconduct by or on behalf of TRADS, and whether there was a fraud on the court by TRADS. As of the date of this report, this case is ongoing.

On October 23, 2014, TRADS filed a Complaint and Motion for Temporary Injunction, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, against James Reilly, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, seeking relief for alleged violation of a noncompetition agreement. On February 5, 2015, the court denied TRADS’ motion for a temporary injunction prohibiting Mr. Reilly from continuing employment with TBO. TRADS has appealed that order. The appeal is pending. An adverse ruling could have an immediate near-term impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and liquidity. As of the date of this report, this case is ongoing.

On November 26, 2014, TRADS filed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, against Daniel MacLachlan, former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of TBO, seeking relief for alleged violation of a noncompetition agreement. On February 10, 2015, the court granted TRADS’ motion for preliminary injunction against Mr. MacLachlan’s continued employment with TBO. That preliminary ruling was appealed and, on August 27, 2015, the appellate court vacated the injunction and remanded the case to the lower court for reconsideration. On October 29, 2015, the lower court reinstated the injunction through February 10, 2016. In the meantime, Mr. MacLachlan is not an employee of the Company, and his job responsibilities have been assumed by Aaron Solomon, VP of Finance and Administration. An adverse ruling could have an immediate near-term impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and liquidity. As of the date of this report, this case is ongoing.

On July 28, 2015, TRADS filed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, against Surya Challa, Vice President of Technology of TBO, seeking relief for an alleged violation of a noncompetition agreement. The hearing on TRADS’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction is set for February 19, 2016. An adverse ruling could have an immediate near-term impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and liquidity. As of the date of this report, this case is ongoing.

On or about July 22, 2015, IDI, Inc., Peter W.H. Tan, Derek Dubner, and Jacky Wang were named as defendants in a class action complaint alleging violations of the U.S. federal securities laws, captioned Garrett Heim v. IDI, Inc., et al., Case No. 9:15-CV-81019-BB, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. On September 10, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed the securities class action lawsuit. This action was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff with no payment made to plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorneys.

As a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to include information otherwise required by this Item.

On June 16, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the issuance of shares to certain third-party vendors for certain investor relation and consulting services. On July 1, 2015, a total of 32,000 shares of Company Common Stock was issued to two consulting firms.

27

Table of Contents

The issuance of the securities described in the paragraph above were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) afforded by Section 4(a)(2) thereof and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, which exception we believe is available because the securities were not offered pursuant to a general solicitation and such issuances were otherwise made in compliance with the requirements of Regulation D and Rule 506. The securities issued in these transactions are restricted and may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act or pursuant to a valid exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

None.

Not Applicable.

None.

The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

28

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

29