Forestar Group Inc. - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 001-33662
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
26-1336998 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building Two, Suite 500, Austin, Texas 78746
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(512) 433-5200
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Number of Shares Outstanding as of | ||
Title of Each Class | August 1, 2011 | |
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share | 35,492,686 |
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | Year-End | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 5,715 | $ | 5,366 | ||||
Real estate |
568,139 | 562,192 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
25,588 | 21,122 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated ventures |
98,909 | 101,166 | ||||||
Timber |
15,998 | 17,959 | ||||||
Receivables, net |
23,382 | 2,875 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
2,824 | 2,034 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
790 | | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
5,423 | 5,577 | ||||||
Oil and gas properties and equipment, net |
2,413 | 322 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
54,141 | 47,141 | ||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
5,989 | 6,527 | ||||||
Other assets |
15,844 | 17,043 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 825,155 | $ | 789,324 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,281 | $ | 4,214 | ||||
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
463 | 994 | ||||||
Accrued property taxes |
5,112 | 3,662 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
1,293 | 1,061 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 3,293 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
9,176 | 8,168 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
35,054 | 32,064 | ||||||
Debt |
260,825 | 221,589 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
316,204 | 275,045 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Forestar Group Inc. shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 25,000,000 authorized shares, none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share, 200,000,000 authorized shares, 36,773,370 issued at June
30, 2011 and 36,667,210 issued at December 31, 2010 |
36,773 | 36,667 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
395,573 | 391,352 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
94,607 | 101,001 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,281,084 shares at June 30, 2011 and 1,216,647 shares at December 31, 2010 |
(20,672 | ) | (19,456 | ) | ||||
Total Forestar Group Inc. shareholders equity |
506,281 | 509,564 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
2,670 | 4,715 | ||||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
508,951 | 514,279 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 825,155 | $ | 789,324 | ||||
Please read the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate sales |
$ | 12,576 | $ | 16,145 | $ | 26,533 | $ | 26,895 | ||||||||
Income producing properties and other |
7,039 | 5,404 | 14,221 | 11,902 | ||||||||||||
Real estate |
19,615 | 21,549 | 40,754 | 38,797 | ||||||||||||
Mineral resources |
4,580 | 4,606 | 11,913 | 11,733 | ||||||||||||
Fiber resources and other |
1,290 | 1,982 | 2,658 | 3,965 | ||||||||||||
25,485 | 28,137 | 55,325 | 54,495 | |||||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of real estate sales |
(5,991 | ) | (7,462 | ) | (11,636 | ) | (13,129 | ) | ||||||||
Cost of income producing properties and other |
(4,366 | ) | (3,945 | ) | (8,891 | ) | (8,749 | ) | ||||||||
Cost of mineral resources |
(438 | ) | (307 | ) | (1,232 | ) | (629 | ) | ||||||||
Cost of fiber resources and other |
(285 | ) | (391 | ) | (532 | ) | (742 | ) | ||||||||
Other operating |
(10,483 | ) | (9,228 | ) | (22,157 | ) | (19,437 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(6,849 | ) | (6,120 | ) | (12,820 | ) | (11,696 | ) | ||||||||
(28,412 | ) | (27,453 | ) | (57,268 | ) | (54,382 | ) | |||||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
(2,927 | ) | 684 | (1,943 | ) | 113 | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated ventures |
402 | 287 | 984 | 658 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(4,653 | ) | (4,103 | ) | (8,662 | ) | (8,649 | ) | ||||||||
Other non-operating income |
24 | 246 | 51 | 444 | ||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES |
(7,154 | ) | (2,886 | ) | (9,570 | ) | (7,434 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
2,828 | (162 | ) | 3,540 | 1,353 | |||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME (LOSS) |
(4,326 | ) | (3,048 | ) | (6,030 | ) | (6,081 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
405 | (225 | ) | (364 | ) | (164 | ) | |||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO FORESTAR GROUP INC. |
$ | (3,921 | ) | $ | (3,273 | ) | $ | (6,394 | ) | $ | (6,245 | ) | ||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC |
35,448 | 36,155 | 35,389 | 36,117 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE BASIC |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) |
Please read the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
First Six Months | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Consolidated net income (loss) |
$ | (6,030 | ) | $ | (6,081 | ) | ||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,864 | 5,293 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(7,000 | ) | (6,950 | ) | ||||
Tax benefits not recognized for book purposes |
95 | 64 | ||||||
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated ventures |
(984 | ) | (658 | ) | ||||
Distributions of earnings of unconsolidated ventures |
4,102 | 99 | ||||||
Distributions of earnings to noncontrolling interests |
(2,491 | ) | (238 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation |
3,952 | 5,553 | ||||||
Non-cash real estate cost of sales |
10,525 | 11,470 | ||||||
Real estate development and acquisition expenditures |
(23,529 | ) | (7,020 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of non-performing loan |
(21,137 | ) | | |||||
Reimbursements from utility and improvement districts |
1,790 | 183 | ||||||
Other changes in real estate |
(5 | ) | 28 | |||||
Gain on termination of timber lease |
(181 | ) | (497 | ) | ||||
Cost of timber cut |
524 | 692 | ||||||
Deferred income |
947 | 1,421 | ||||||
Asset impairments |
450 | 900 | ||||||
Loss on sale of assets held for sale |
| 277 | ||||||
Other |
74 | (113 | ) | |||||
Changes in: |
||||||||
Notes and accounts receivable |
530 | (9,771 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(239 | ) | 147 | |||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
3,896 | (8,154 | ) | |||||
Income taxes |
(4,083 | ) | (5,518 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities |
(33,930 | ) | (18,873 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Property, equipment, software and reforestation |
(899 | ) | (1,392 | ) | ||||
Oil and gas properties and equipment |
(2,112 | ) | | |||||
Investment in unconsolidated ventures |
(1,135 | ) | (1,039 | ) | ||||
Return of investment in unconsolidated ventures |
252 | 4,784 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale |
| 2,602 | ||||||
Proceeds from termination of timber lease |
290 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
103 | | ||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities |
(3,501 | ) | 4,955 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Payments of debt |
(37,043 | ) | (19,750 | ) | ||||
Additions to debt |
76,279 | 18,527 | ||||||
Deferred financing fees |
(1,379 | ) | | |||||
Return of investment to noncontrolling interest |
(1 | ) | (598 | ) | ||||
Exercise of stock options |
1,167 | 872 | ||||||
Payroll taxes on restricted stock and stock options |
(1,216 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Tax benefit from share-based compensation |
(110 | ) | 121 | |||||
Other |
83 | 103 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
37,780 | (774 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
349 | (14,692 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
5,366 | 21,051 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 5,715 | $ | 6,359 | ||||
Please read the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
FORESTAR GROUP INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Forestar Group Inc., all
subsidiaries, ventures and other entities in which we have a controlling interest and variable
interest entities of which we are the primary beneficiary. We eliminate all material intercompany
accounts and transactions. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated pass-through entities are
recognized before income taxes. We account for our investment in other entities in which we have
significant influence over operations and financial policies using the equity method (we recognize
our share of the entities income or loss and any preferential returns and treat distributions as a
reduction of our investment). We account for our investment in other entities in which we do not
have significant influence over operations and financial policies using the cost method (we
recognize as income distributions of accumulated earnings).
We prepare our unaudited interim financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles and Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for interim
financial statements. As a result, they do not include all the information and disclosures required
for complete financial statements. However, in our opinion, all adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items
unless otherwise noted. We make estimates and assumptions about future events. Actual results can,
and probably will, differ from those we currently estimate including those related to allocating
cost of sales to real estate, minerals and fiber and measuring assets for impairment. These interim
operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire
year. For further information, please read the financial statements included in our 2010 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
In 2011, we reclassified $199,000 and $397,000 from cost of income producing properties to
operating expenses in second quarter and first six months 2010 to conform to the current years
presentation.
Note 2 New and Pending Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2011
In first quarter 2011, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-28 When to Perform
Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts
and ASU 2010-29 Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.
Adoption of these pronouncements did not affect our earnings or financial position.
Pending Accounting Standards
Pending ASU 2011-04 Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value
Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs and ASU 2011-05 Comprehensive
Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income will be effective first quarter 2012. Adoption is not
anticipated to have a significant effect on our earnings or financial position but will likely
result in certain additional disclosures.
Note 3 Strategic Initiatives and Assets Held for Sale
In 2009, we announced our near-term strategic initiatives to enhance shareholder value by
generating significant cash flow, principally from the sale of 175,000 acres of higher and better
use timberland; reducing debt by $150,000,000; and repurchasing up to 20 percent of our common
stock.
Since announcing these initiatives, we have sold 119,000 acres of timber and timberland in
Georgia, Alabama and Texas for $197,381,000 generating combined net proceeds of $191,891,000, which
were principally used to reduce debt, pay taxes, reinvest in qualifying real estate and repurchase
our common stock. These transactions resulted in a combined gain on sale of assets of $132,654,000.
In 2010, we repurchased 1,000,987 shares of our common stock at a cost of $15,178,000. The
repurchased shares are classified as treasury stock.
At second quarter-end 2011, assets held for sale includes 65,000 acres of undeveloped land
with a carrying value of $18,024,000 and related timber with a carrying value of $7,564,000. We
continue to actively market this land. Please read Note 19 for information regarding a sale of
50,000 acres of timberland subsequent to second quarter-end 2011.
6
Table of Contents
Note 4 Real Estate
Real estate consists of:
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | Year-End | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Entitled, developed and under development projects |
$ | 400,287 | $ | 403,059 | ||||
Undeveloped land |
90,067 | 86,608 | ||||||
Income producing properties |
102,983 | 95,963 | ||||||
593,337 | 585,630 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(25,198 | ) | (23,438 | ) | ||||
$ | 568,139 | $ | 562,192 | |||||
Included in entitled, developed and under development projects are the estimated costs of
assets we expect to convey to utility and improvement districts of $62,030,000 at second
quarter-end 2011 and $59,079,000 at year-end 2010, including $36,552,000 included in both second
quarter-end 2011 and year-end 2010 related to our Cibolo Canyons project near San Antonio, Texas.
These costs relate to water, sewer and other infrastructure assets we have submitted to utility or
improvement districts for approval and reimbursement. We submitted for reimbursement to these
districts $2,336,000 in first six months 2011 and $1,827,000 in first six months 2010. We collected
$187,000 from these districts in first six months 2011 and $183,000 in first six months 2010. We
expect to collect the remaining amounts billed when these districts achieve adequate tax bases to
support payment.
Also included in entitled, developed and under development projects is our investment in the
resort development owned by third parties at our Cibolo Canyons project. In second quarter 2011, we
received $1,603,000 from the Special Improvement District (SID) related to hotel
occupancy revenues and other revenues from resort sales collected as taxes by the SID. We currently
account for these collections as a reduction of our investment. At second-quarter-end 2011, we have
$40,399,000 invested in the resort development.
Income producing properties principally represents our investment in a 401 unit multifamily
property in Houston, Texas and a 413 room hotel in Austin, Texas. In addition, in second quarter
2011, we reclassified $4,555,000 in land from entitled, developed and under development projects to
income producing properties as result of commencing construction on a 289 unit multifamily project
in Austin, Texas. At second-quarter end 2011, our investment in this project, including land and
construction in progress is $5,961,000, with an estimated additional cost to complete construction
of $24,579,000.
We recognized asset impairment charges in second quarter 2011 of $450,000 related to a
residential real estate project located near Dallas, Texas and $900,000 in second quarter 2010
related to a residential real estate project located near Salt Lake City, Utah.
Depreciation expense, primarily related to income producing properties, was $1,760,000 in
first six months 2011 and $1,465,000 in first six months 2010 and is included in other operating
expenses.
Note 5 Timber
We own directly or through ventures approximately 201,000 acres of timber, primarily in
Georgia. The cost of timber cut and sold was $524,000 in first six months 2011 and $692,000 in
first six months 2010.
Note 6 Shareholders Equity
A reconciliation of changes in shareholders equity at second quarter-end 2011 follows:
Forestar | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||
Group Inc. | Interests | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at year-end 2010 |
$ | 509,564 | $ | 4,715 | $ | 514,279 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
(6,394 | ) | 364 | (6,030 | ) | |||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| (2,492 | ) | (2,492 | ) | |||||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
| 83 | 83 | |||||||||
Other (primarily share-based compensation) |
3,111 | | 3,111 | |||||||||
Balance at second quarter-end 2011 |
$ | 506,281 | $ | 2,670 | $ | 508,951 | ||||||
In first six months 2011, we issued 106,160 shares of our common stock as a result of
stock option exercises and vesting of equity-settled restricted stock units.
7
Table of Contents
Note 7 Investment in Unconsolidated Ventures
At second quarter-end 2011, we had ownership interests ranging from 25 to 50 percent in 10
ventures that we account for using the equity method. We have no real estate ventures that are
accounted for using the cost method. Our three largest ventures at second quarter-end 2011 are CL
Realty, Temco and Palisades West. We own a 50 percent interest in both CL Realty and Temco, and
Cousins Real Estate Corporation owns the other 50 percent interest. We own a 25 percent interest in
Palisades West, Cousins Properties Incorporated owns a 50 percent interest and Dimensional Fund
Advisors LP owns the remaining 25 percent interest. Information regarding these ventures follows:
| CL Realty, L.L.C. was formed in 2002 for the purpose of developing residential and mixed-use communities in Texas and across the southeastern United States. At second quarter-end 2011, the venture has 14 residential and mixed-use communities, of which 10 are in Texas, 3 are in Florida and 1 is in Georgia, representing approximately 5,200 planned residential lots and 290 commercial acres. | ||
| Temco Associates, LLC was formed in 1991 for the purpose of acquiring and developing residential real estate sites in Georgia. At second quarter-end 2011, the venture has 4 residential and mixed-use communities, representing approximately 1,550 planned residential lots, all of which are located in Paulding County, Georgia. The venture also owns 5,712 acres of undeveloped land in Paulding County, Georgia. | ||
| Palisades West LLC was formed in 2006 for the purpose of constructing a commercial office park in Austin, Texas. The project includes two office buildings totaling approximately 375,000 square feet and an accompanying parking garage. At second quarter-end 2011, the buildings are approximately 97 percent leased. Our remaining commitment for investment in this venture as of second quarter-end 2011 is $1,532,000. Effective fourth quarter 2008, we entered into a 10-year operating lease for approximately 32,000 square feet that we occupy as our corporate headquarters. In second quarter and first six months 2011, rents paid under this operating lease were $256,000 and $560,000 and are included in general and administrative and other operating expenses. |
Combined summarized balance sheet information for our ventures accounted for using the equity
method follows:
Second Quarter-End 2011 | Year-End 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CL | Palisades | Other | CL | Palisades | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Realty | Temco | West | Ventures | Total | Realty | Temco | West | Ventures | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
$ | 81,898 | $ | 59,567 | $ | 121,754 | $ | 66,942 | $ | 330,161 | $ | 85,436 | $ | 60,454 | $ | 124,696 | $ | 69,612 | $ | 340,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
82,838 | 60,232 | 125,907 | 76,782 | 345,759 | 86,657 | 60,609 | 129,378 | 78,060 | 354,704 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings (a) |
1,727 | 2,859 | | 74,080 | 78,666 | 2,664 | 2,929 | | 74,605 | 80,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,478 | 3,270 | 45,227 | (b) | 88,150 | 140,125 | 4,124 | 3,133 | 48,612 | (b) | 87,145 | 143,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
79,360 | 56,962 | 80,680 | (11,368 | ) | 205,634 | 82,533 | 57,476 | 80,766 | (9,085 | ) | 211,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our investment in real estate ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our share of their equity (c) |
39,680 | 28,481 | 20,170 | 13,726 | 102,057 | 41,267 | 28,738 | 20,191 | 14,075 | 104,271 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrecognized deferred gain (d) |
(2,190 | ) | | | (958 | ) | (3,148 | ) | (2,190 | ) | | | (915 | ) | (3,105 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in real estate ventures |
$ | 37,490 | $ | 28,481 | $ | 20,170 | $ | 12,768 | $ | 98,909 | $ | 39,077 | $ | 28,738 | $ | 20,191 | $ | 13,160 | $ | 101,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8
Table of Contents
Combined summarized income statement information for our ventures accounted for using the
equity method follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
CL Realty |
$ | 1,649 | $ | 2,485 | $ | 3,518 | $ | 4,212 | ||||||||
Temco |
288 | 89 | 346 | 1,877 | ||||||||||||
Palisades West |
4,084 | 3,416 | 8,114 | 6,731 | ||||||||||||
Other ventures |
4,116 | 6,355 | 5,665 | 8,220 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,137 | $ | 12,345 | $ | 17,643 | $ | 21,040 | ||||||||
Earnings (Loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CL Realty |
$ | 734 | $ | 1,364 | $ | 1,390 | $ | 1,220 | ||||||||
Temco |
(212 | ) | (388 | ) | (416 | ) | 812 | |||||||||
Palisades West |
1,455 | 1,158 | 2,911 | 2,282 | ||||||||||||
Other ventures |
(1,262 | ) | (15,190 | ) | (2,132 | ) | (16,283 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 715 | $ | (13,056 | ) | $ | 1,753 | $ | (11,969 | ) | ||||||
Our equity in their earnings (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CL Realty |
$ | 367 | $ | 682 | $ | 695 | $ | 610 | ||||||||
Temco |
(106 | ) | (194 | ) | (208 | ) | 406 | |||||||||
Palisades West |
364 | 290 | 728 | 569 | ||||||||||||
Other ventures (c) |
(223 | ) | (491 | ) | (231 | ) | (927 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 402 | $ | 287 | $ | 984 | $ | 658 | ||||||||
(a) | Total includes current maturities of $72,118,000 at second quarter-end 2011, of which $43,262,000 is non-recourse to us, and $75,121,000 at year-end 2010, of which $43,166,000 is non-recourse to us. | |
(b) | Includes $43,678,000 of deferred income from leasehold improvements funded by tenants in excess of leasehold improvement allowances. These amounts are recognized as rental income over the lease term and are offset by depreciation expense related to these tenant improvements. There is no effect on venture net income. | |
(c) | Our share of the equity in other ventures reflects our ownership interests ranging from 25 to 50 percent, excluding venture losses that exceed our investment where we are not obligated to fund those losses. | |
(d) | Represents deferred gains on real estate contributed by us to ventures. We are recognizing income as real estate is sold to third parties. The deferred gains are reflected as a reduction to our investment in unconsolidated ventures. |
In first six months 2011, we invested $1,135,000 in these ventures and received $4,354,000 in
distributions; in first six months 2010, we invested $1,039,000 in these ventures and received
$4,883,000 in distributions. Distributions include both return of investments and distributions of
earnings.
At second quarter-end 2011, other ventures include three partnerships we participate in that
have total assets of $51,504,000 and total liabilities of $82,740,000, which includes $67,532,000
of borrowings classified as current maturities. These partnerships are managed by third parties who
intend to extend or refinance these borrowings; however, there is no assurance that this can be
done. Although these borrowings may be guaranteed by third parties, we may under certain
circumstances elect or be required to provide additional equity to these partnerships. We do not
believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a significant effect on our
earnings or financial position. Our investment in these partnerships is $2,751,000 at second
quarter-end 2011. These three partnerships are variable interest entities. Please read Note 17 for
additional information.
In second quarter and first six months 2011, CL Realtys earnings include an impairment charge
of $500,000 related to a residential real estate project located in Tampa, Florida.
In second quarter and first six months 2010, other ventures loss includes a $13,061,000 loss
on sale of a golf course and country club property in Denton, Texas. This loss did not impact our
equity in the earnings (loss) of this venture as we exclude losses that exceed our investment where
we are not obligated to provide additional funding.
We have provided performance bonds and letters of credit on behalf of certain ventures
totaling $1,447,000 at second quarter-end 2011. Generally these performance bonds and letters of
credit would be drawn on due to lack of performance by us or the ventures, such as failure to
timely deliver streets and utilities in accordance with local codes and ordinances.
9
Table of Contents
Note 8 Receivables
Receivables consist of:
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | Year-End | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-performing loan |
$ | 21,137 | $ | | ||||
Notes receivable, average interest rates of 7.56% at second quarter-end 2011 and 7.93% at year-end 2010 |
1,974 | 1,057 | ||||||
Due from qualified intermediary |
| 1,347 | ||||||
Receivables and accrued interest |
332 | 615 | ||||||
23,443 | 3,019 | |||||||
Allowance for bad debts |
(61 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||
$ | 23,382 | $ | 2,875 | |||||
In second quarter 2011, we acquired a non-performing loan from a financial institution
for $21,137,000. The original loan commitment was $38,000,000 and the current principal balance
outstanding is about $31,600,000. The loan matured in February 2010. The note is secured by a lien
on 900 acres of developed and undeveloped real estate located near Houston, Texas designated for
single-family residential and commercial development. We are not currently accruing interest and
did not record any accretable yield at acquisition due to the non-performing status of the loan. We
cannot estimate the anticipated future cash flows because the borrower is in bankruptcy.
Notes receivable generally are secured by a deed of trust and generally due within three
years.
Receivables and accrued interest principally include miscellaneous operating receivables
arising in the normal course of business.
Note 9 Debt
Debt consists of:
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | Year-End | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Term loan facility average interest rate of 6.50% at second quarter-end 2011 and year-end 2010 |
$ | 130,000 | $ | 125,000 | ||||
Revolving loan facility average interest rate of 6.51% at second quarter-end 2011 |
51,000 | | ||||||
Secured promissory notes average interest rate of 4.94% at second quarter-end 2011 and 4.51% at
year-end 2010 |
26,500 | 41,716 | ||||||
Other indebtedness due through 2017 at variable and fixed interest rates ranging from 5.00% to 8.00% |
53,325 | 54,873 | ||||||
$ | 260,825 | $ | 221,589 | |||||
Our senior credit facility and other debt agreements contain financial covenants
customary for such agreements including minimum levels of interest coverage and limitations on
leverage. At second quarter-end 2011, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of these
agreements.
On February 23, 2011, we supplemented our amended and restated senior credit facility to add a
new lender to the revolving loan and to the term loan increasing the aggregate commitment by
$30,000,000. We incurred fees of $270,000 related to this additional commitment. In addition, on
May 6, 2011, we amended our senior secured credit facility to provide us with additional
flexibility and to make certain technical and other changes. We incurred fees of $583,500 related
to this amendment.
At second quarter-end 2011, our senior credit facility provides for a $130,000,000 term loan
and a $200,000,000 revolving line of credit. The term loan matures August 6, 2015, and the
revolving line of credit matures August 6, 2013 (with a one-year extension option to August 6,
2014). The term loan includes a 2 percent prepayment penalty for payments in excess of $25,000,000
prior to August 6, 2011 and 1 percent prepayment penalty prior to February 6, 2012 and no
prepayment penalty thereafter. The revolving line of credit may be prepaid at any time without
penalty. The revolving line of credit includes a $100,000,000 sublimit for letters of credit, of
which $3,467,000 is outstanding at second quarter-end 2011. Total borrowings under our senior
credit facility (including the face amount of letters of credit) may not exceed a borrowing base
formula. At second quarter-end 2011, we had $111,386,000 in net unused borrowing capacity under our
senior credit facility.
At our option, we can borrow at LIBOR plus 4.5 percent (subject to a 2 percent LIBOR floor) or
prime plus 2.5 percent. Borrowings under the senior credit facility are secured by (a) all
timberland and minerals, (b) assignments of current and future leases, rents and contracts,
including our mineral leases, (c) a security interest in our primary operating account, (d) pledge
of the equity interests in current and future material operating subsidiaries or joint venture
interests, or if such pledge is not permitted, a pledge of the right to distributions from such
entities, to the extent permitted, and (e) negative pledge (without a mortgage) on all other
wholly-
owned assets. The senior credit facility provides for releases of real estate to be delivered
provided that borrowing base compliance is maintained.
10
Table of Contents
At second quarter-end 2011, directly and through consolidated ventures, we have $7,419,000 in
unamortized deferred financing fees which are included in other assets. Amortization of deferred
financing fees was $1,472,000 in first six months 2011 and $2,882,000 in first six months 2010 and
is included in interest expense.
At second quarter-end 2011, a 401 unit multifamily project located in Houston, Texas with
current book value of $47,337,000 is pledged as collateral for and is subject to liens in
connection with a $26,500,000 loan. In second quarter 2011, we paid in full a $15,216,000 loan with
borrowings from our revolving loan facility. This loan was secured by a 413 guest room hotel
located in Austin, Texas.
At second quarter-end 2011, entitled, developed and under development projects having a book
value of $116,492,000 are subject to liens in connection with $53,325,000 of principally
non-recourse debt.
Note 10 Fair Value
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis principally include real
estate assets and assets held for sale, which are measured for impairment. In second quarter 2011,
a real estate asset was remeasured and reported at fair value due to events or circumstances that
indicated the carrying value may not be recoverable. We determined estimated fair value based on
the present value of future probability weighted cash flows expected from the sale of the
long-lived asset. As a result, we recognized asset impairment of $450,000 in second quarter 2011.
The carrying value of this asset may have subsequently increased or decreased from the fair value
reflected due to activity that has occurred since the measurement date.
Second | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | Quarter-End | |||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Financial Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,762 | $ | 2,762 |
We elected not to use the fair value option for cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, other current assets, variable debt, accounts payable and other current liabilities.
The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to their
short-term nature or variable interest rates. We determine the fair value of fixed rate financial
instruments using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets.
Information about our fixed rate financial instruments not measured at fair value follows:
Second Quarter-End 2011 | Year-End 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | Technique | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt |
$ | (29,931 | ) | $ | (30,412 | ) | $ | (29,931 | ) | $ | (30,164 | ) | Level 2 |
Note 11 Capital Stock
Pursuant to our shareholder rights plan, each share of common stock outstanding is coupled
with one-quarter of a preferred stock purchase right (Right). Each Right entitles our shareholders
to purchase, under certain conditions, one one-hundredth of a share of newly issued Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $100. Rights will be exercisable only if
someone acquires beneficial ownership of 20 percent or more of our common shares or commences a
tender or exchange offer, upon consummation of which they would beneficially own 20 percent or more
of our common shares. We will generally be entitled to redeem the Rights at $0.001 per Right at any
time until the 10th business day following public announcement that a 20 percent position has been
acquired. The Rights will expire on December 11, 2017.
Please read Note 18 for information about additional shares of common stock that could be
issued under terms of our share-based compensation plans.
As a result of the 2007 spin-offs from Temple-Inland, at second quarter-end 2011, personnel of
Temple-Inland and the other spin-off entity held 19,000 awards that will be settled in our common
stock and options to purchase 1,130,000 shares of our common stock. Information about these stock
options follows:
Weighted | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||
Average | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | (Current | ||||||||||||||
Average | Contractual | Value Less | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | Term | Exercise Price) | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (Per share) | (In years) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding and exercisable |
1,130 | $ | 21.52 | 4 | $ | 1,427 |
11
Table of Contents
Note 12 Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive loss consists of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income (loss) |
$ | (4,326 | ) | $ | (3,048 | ) | $ | (6,030 | ) | $ | (6,081 | ) | ||||
Change in fair value of interest rate swap agreement |
| | | 393 | ||||||||||||
Income tax effect of change in fair value |
| | | (137 | ) | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
(4,326 | ) | (3,048 | ) | (6,030 | ) | (5,825 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
405 | (225 | ) | (364 | ) | (164 | ) | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Forestar Group Inc. |
$ | (3,921 | ) | $ | (3,273 | ) | $ | (6,394 | ) | $ | (5,989 | ) | ||||
Note 13 Earnings (Loss) per Share
Loss attributable to common shareholders and weighted average common shares outstanding used
to compute net loss per share were:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income (loss) |
$ | (4,326 | ) | $ | (3,048 | ) | $ | (6,030 | ) | $ | (6,081 | ) | ||||
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
405 | (225 | ) | (364 | ) | (164 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Forestar Group Inc. |
$ | (3,921 | ) | $ | (3,273 | ) | $ | (6,394 | ) | $ | (6,245 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
35,448 | 36,155 | 35,389 | 36,117 |
At second quarter-end 2011 and 2010, the effect of 3,182,000 and 3,041,000 stock options,
equity-settled awards and unvested shares of restricted stock were not included in the computation
of diluted weighted average shares outstanding because they were anti-dilutive.
Note 14 Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was a 40 percent benefit in second quarter 2011 and a 37 percent
benefit in first six months 2011, which includes a 2 percent non-cash charge for share-based
compensation. Our effective tax rate was 6 percent in second quarter 2010 and an 18 percent benefit
in first six months 2010, which included a 23 percent benefit attributable to noncontrolling
interests. In addition, 2011 and 2010 effective tax rates include the effect of state income taxes,
nondeductible items, noncontrolling interests and benefits of percentage depletion.
We have not provided a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset because we believe it is
likely it will be recoverable in future periods.
At second quarter-end 2011, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $7,718,000, of which
$6,343,000 would affect our effective tax rate if recognized.
Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary
course of doing business and believe that adequate reserves have been established for any probable
losses. We do not believe that the outcome of any of these proceedings should have a significant
adverse effect on our financial position, long-term results of operations or cash flows. It is
possible; however, that charges related to these matters could be significant to our results or
cash flows in any one accounting period.
Environmental
Environmental remediation liabilities arise from time to time in the ordinary course of doing
business, and we believe we have established adequate reserves for any probable losses. We own 288
acres near Antioch, California, portions of which were sites of a
former Temple-Inland paper manufacturing operation that are in remediation. We estimate the
cost to complete remediation activities will be approximately $1,940,000, which is included in
other accrued expenses and will likely be paid in 2011 or 2012. Our estimate requires us to make
assumptions regarding the scope of required remediation, the effectiveness of planned remediation
activities, and approvals by regulatory authorities. Our estimate is subject to revision as new
information becomes available.
12
Table of Contents
Note 16 Segment Information
We manage our operations through three business segments: real estate, mineral resources and
fiber resources. Real estate secures entitlements and develops infrastructure on our lands for
single-family residential and mixed-use communities, and manages our undeveloped land and income
producing properties, primarily a hotel and a multifamily property. Mineral resources manages our
oil, natural gas and water interests. Fiber resources manages our timber and recreational leases.
Assets allocated by segment are as follows:
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | Year-End | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Real estate |
$ | 694,686 | $ | 669,363 | ||||
Mineral resources |
14,580 | 13,399 | ||||||
Fiber resources |
16,201 | 18,258 | ||||||
Assets not allocated to segments |
99,688 | 88,304 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 825,155 | $ | 789,324 | ||||
We evaluate performance based on segment earnings (loss) before unallocated items and
income taxes. Segment earnings (loss) consist of operating income, equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated ventures and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. Items not
allocated to our business segments consist of general and administrative expense, share-based
compensation, gain on sale of assets, interest expense and other non-operating income and expense.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the accounting policy
note to the consolidated financial statements. Our revenues are derived from our U.S. operations
and all of our assets are located in the U.S. In first six months 2011, no single customer
accounted for more than 10 percent of our total revenues.
Segment revenues and earnings are as follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
$ | 19,615 | $ | 21,549 | $ | 40,754 | $ | 38,797 | ||||||||
Mineral resources |
4,580 | 4,606 | 11,913 | 11,733 | ||||||||||||
Fiber resources |
1,290 | 1,982 | 2,658 | 3,965 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 25,485 | $ | 28,137 | $ | 55,325 | $ | 54,495 | ||||||||
Segment earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 2,454 | $ | 3,582 | $ | 2,766 | ||||||||
Mineral resources |
3,102 | 4,266 | 8,700 | 10,444 | ||||||||||||
Fiber resources |
704 | 1,085 | 1,344 | 2,528 | ||||||||||||
Total segment earnings |
4,813 | 7,805 | 13,626 | 15,738 | ||||||||||||
Items not allocated to segments (a) |
(11,562 | ) | (10,916 | ) | (23,560 | ) | (23,336 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes attributable to Forestar Group Inc. |
$ | (6,749 | ) | $ | (3,111 | ) | $ | (9,934 | ) | $ | (7,598 | ) | ||||
(a) | Items not allocated to segments consist of: |
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
$ | (7,081 | ) | $ | (5,040 | ) | $ | (10,997 | ) | $ | (9,578 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation expense |
148 | (2,019 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (5,553 | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(4,653 | ) | (4,103 | ) | (8,662 | ) | (8,649 | ) | ||||||||
Other non-operating income |
24 | 246 | 51 | 444 | ||||||||||||
$ | (11,562 | ) | $ | (10,916 | ) | $ | (23,560 | ) | $ | (23,336 | ) | |||||
Second quarter and first six months 2011, general and administrative expense includes
$2,730,000 associated with proposed private debt offerings that we withdrew as a result of
deterioration of the terms available to us in the capital markets.
Note 17 Variable Interest Entities
At second quarter-end 2011, we are the primary beneficiary of two VIEs that we consolidate. We
have provided the majority of equity to these VIEs, which absent our contributions or advances do
not have sufficient equity to fund their operations. We have the
13
Table of Contents
authority to approve project
budgets and the issuance of additional debt. At second quarter-end 2011, our consolidated balance
sheet includes $14,704,000 in assets, principally real estate and $5,002,000 in liabilities related
to these two VIEs. In first six months 2011, we contributed or advanced $2,303,000 to these VIEs.
In first six months 2010, real estate assets decreased by $11,865,000, debt decreased by
$13,207,000 and other liabilities increased by $1,342,000 due to lender foreclosure of a lien on
property owned by one of these VIEs. In second quarter 2011, our earnings benefited from a
$1,342,000 reallocation of a previously recognized loss related to foreclosure of a lien on
property in the above VIE. Based on our access to new information, we determined this loss and
related liability should be allocated from us to the noncontrolling financial interests as we
believe the likelihood we will be subject to any potential lender liabilities is remote. We have a
nominal general partner interest in this VIE and could be held responsible for certain of its
liabilities.
Also at second quarter-end 2011, we are not the primary beneficiary of three VIEs that we
account for using the equity method. The unrelated managing partners oversee the day-to-day
operations and guarantee some of the debt of the VIEs while we have the authority to approve
project budgets and the issuance of additional debt. Although some of the debt is guaranteed by the
managing partners, we may under certain circumstances elect or be required to provide additional
funds to these VIEs. At second quarter-end 2011, these three VIEs have total assets of $51,504,000,
substantially all of which represent developed and undeveloped real estate and total liabilities of
$82,740,000, which includes $67,532,000 of borrowings classified as current maturities. These
amounts are included in other ventures in the combined summarized balance sheet information for
ventures accounted for using the equity method in Note 7. At second quarter-end 2011, our
investment in these three VIEs is $2,751,000 and is included in investment in unconsolidated
ventures. In first six months 2011, we contributed or advanced $114,000 to these VIEs. Our maximum
exposure to loss related to these VIEs is estimated at $36,295,000, which exceeds our investment as
we have a nominal general partner interest in two of these VIEs and could be held responsible for
their liabilities. The maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss that we could be
required to recognize assuming all the ventures assets (principally real estate) are worthless,
without consideration of the probability of a loss or of any actions we may take to mitigate any
such loss.
Note 18 Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense consists of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash-settled awards |
$ | (1,488 | ) | $ | 640 | $ | 681 | $ | 2,765 | |||||||
Equity-settled awards |
262 | | 411 | | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
607 | 912 | 1,270 | 1,615 | ||||||||||||
Stock options |
471 | 467 | 1,590 | 1,173 | ||||||||||||
$ | (148 | ) | $ | 2,019 | $ | 3,952 | $ | 5,553 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation expense is included in:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
$ | (232 | ) | $ | 1,080 | $ | 1,823 | $ | 2,118 | |||||||
Other operating expense |
84 | 939 | 2,129 | 3,435 | ||||||||||||
$ | (148 | ) | $ | 2,019 | $ | 3,952 | $ | 5,553 | ||||||||
In second quarter and first six months 2011, the decrease in share-based compensation
expense is primarily due to the impact of stock price changes on vested cash-settled awards.
The fair value of awards granted to retirement eligible employees and expensed at the date of
grant was $654,000 in first six months 2011 and $286,000 in first six months 2010. Unrecognized
share-based compensation expense related to non-vested equity-settled awards, restricted stock and
stock options is $9,519,000 at second quarter-end 2011. The weighted average period over which this
amount will be recognized is estimated to be two years. We did not capitalize any share-based
compensation in first six months 2011 or 2010.
In first six months 2011, we withheld 64,437 shares having a value of $1,216,000 in connection
with vesting of restricted stock awards and exercises of stock options. In first six months 2010,
we withheld 2,601 shares having a value of $49,000 in connection with vesting of restricted stock
awards and exercises of stock options. These shares are included in treasury stock and are
reflected in financing activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
A summary of the awards granted under our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan follows:
Cash-settled awards
Cash-settled awards granted to our employees in the form of restricted stock units or stock
appreciation rights generally vest over three to four years from the date of grant and generally
provide for accelerated vesting upon death, disability or if there is a change in
14
Table of Contents
control. Vesting
for some restricted stock unit awards is also conditioned upon achievement of a minimum one percent
annualized return on assets over a three-year period. Cash-settled stock appreciation rights have a
ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably over three to four years and provide for
accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if there is a change in
control. Stock appreciation rights were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of
our stock on the date of grant.
Cash-settled awards granted to our directors in the form of restricted stock units are fully
vested at the time of grant and payable upon retirement.
The following table summarizes the activity of cash-settled restricted stock unit awards in
first six months 2011:
Weighted | ||||||||
Equivalent | Average Grant | |||||||
Units | Date Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | (Per unit) | |||||||
Non-vested at beginning of period |
376 | $ | 11.88 | |||||
Granted |
146 | 17.49 | ||||||
Vested |
(64 | ) | 16.02 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Non-vested at end of period |
458 | $ | 13.10 | |||||
The following table summarizes the activity of cash-settled stock appreciation rights in
first six months 2011:
Weighted | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||
Average | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | (Current | ||||||||||||||
Rights | Average | Contractual | Value Less | |||||||||||||
Outstanding | Exercise Price | Term | Exercise Price) | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (Per share) | (In years) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
909 | $ | 11.28 | 8 | $ | 7,289 | ||||||||||
Granted |
| | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(12 | ) | 9.29 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
897 | $ | 11.30 | 8 | $ | 4,888 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at end of period |
380 | $ | 10.48 | 8 | $ | 2,333 |
The fair value of awards settled in cash was $184,000 in first six months 2011 and
$731,000 in first six months 2010. At second quarter-end 2011, the fair value of vested
cash-settled awards is $14,296,000 and is included in other liabilities. The aggregate current
value of non-vested cash-settled awards is $10,082,000 at second quarter-end 2011 based on a
quarter-end stock price of $16.43.
Equity-settled awards
Equity-settled awards granted to our employees include restricted stock units (RSU), which
vest ratably over three years from the date of grant, and beginning first quarter 2011,
market-leveraged stock units (MSU), which vest after three years. The following table summarizes
the activity of equity-settled awards in first six months 2011:
Weighted | ||||||||
Equivalent | Average Grant | |||||||
Units | Date Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | (Per share) | |||||||
Non-vested at beginning of period |
| $ | | |||||
Granted |
160 | 20.73 | ||||||
Vested |
| | ||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Non-vested at end of period |
160 | $ | 20.73 | |||||
In first quarter 2011, we granted 124,700 MSU awards. These awards will be settled in
common stock based upon our stock price performance over three years from the date of grant. The
number of shares to be issued could range from a high of 187,050 shares if our stock price
increases by 50 percent or more, to a low of 62,350 shares if our stock price decreases by 50
percent, or could be zero if our stock price decreases by more than 50 percent, the minimum
threshold performance. MSU awards are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model, which
includes expected stock price volatility and risk-free interest rate assumptions. Compensation
expense is recognized regardless of achievement of performance conditions, provided the requisite
service period is satisfied.
Unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested equity-settled awards is
$2,745,000 at second quarter-end 2011. The weighted average period over which this amount will be
recognized is estimated to be three years.
15
Table of Contents
Restricted stock
Restricted stock awards vest either ratably over or after three years, generally if we achieve
a minimum one percent annualized return on assets over such three-year period. The following table
summarizes the activity of restricted stock awards in first six months 2011:
Weighted | ||||||||
Restricted | Average Grant | |||||||
Shares | Date Fair Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | (Per share) | |||||||
Non-vested at beginning of period |
636 | $ | 17.56 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
(199 | ) | 24.77 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Non-vested at end of period |
437 | $ | 14.27 | |||||
Unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock
awards is $3,204,000 at second quarter-end 2011. The weighted average period over which this amount
will be recognized is estimated to be two years.
Stock options
Stock options have a ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably over three to four
years and provide for accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if
there is a change in control. Options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market value
of our stock on the date of grant. The following table summarizes the activity of stock option
awards in first six months 2011:
Weighted | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||
Average | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | (Current | ||||||||||||||
Options | Average | Contractual | Value Less | |||||||||||||
Outstanding | Exercise Price | Term | Exercise Price) | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (Per share) | (In years) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
957 | $ | 23.45 | 8 | $ | 1,890 | ||||||||||
Granted |
327 | 18.59 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
1,284 | $ | 22.22 | 8 | $ | 1,154 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at end of period |
642 | $ | 25.61 | 7 | $ | 577 |
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
and the following assumptions:
First Six Months | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
Expected stock price volatility |
56.2 | % | 51.0 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.4 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||
Expected life of options (years) |
6 | 6 | ||||||
Weighted average estimated fair value of options granted |
$ | 10.11 | $ | 8.98 |
We have limited historical experience as a stand-alone company so we utilized alternative
methods in determining our valuation assumptions. The expected life was based on the simplified
method utilizing the midpoint between the vesting period and the contractual life of the awards. In
2011, the expected stock price volatility was based on a blended rate utilizing our historical
volatility and historical prices of our peers common stock for a period corresponding to the
expected life of the options. In 2010, the expected stock price volatility was based on historical
prices of our peers common stock for a period corresponding to the expected life of the options.
Pre-vesting forfeitures are estimated based upon the pool of participants and their expected
activity and historical trends.
Unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options is
$3,570,000 at second quarter-end 2011. The weighted average period over which this amount will be
recognized is estimated to be three years.
Pre-Spin Awards
Certain of our employees participated in Temple-Inlands share-based compensation plans. In
conjunction with the 2007 spin-off, these awards were equitably adjusted into separate awards of
the common stock of Temple-Inland and the spin-off entities.
16
Table of Contents
Stock options have a ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably over four years and
provide for accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if there is a
change in control. A summary of stock option awards outstanding at second quarter-end 2011 follows:
Weighted | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||
Average | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Remaining | (Current | ||||||||||||||
Options | Average | Contractual | Value Less | |||||||||||||
Outstanding | Exercise Price | Term | Exercise Price) | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (Per share) | (In years) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Outstanding and exercisable on Forestar stock |
77 | $ | 22.08 | 4 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||
Outstanding and exercisable on Temple-Inland stock |
145 | 21.30 | 5 | 1,224 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,338 | |||||||||||||||
The intrinsic value of options exercised was $337,000 in first six months 2011 and
$553,000 in first six months 2010.
Note 19 Subsequent Events
On August 5, 2011, we completed our previously announced sale of 50,000 acres of timber and
timberland in Georgia and Alabama to Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. for $75,000,000 in a cash
transaction.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless
otherwise indicated, information is presented as of second quarter-end 2011, and references to
acreage owned includes all acres owned by ventures regardless of our ownership interest in a
venture.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other materials we have filed or may file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and
phrases such as believe, anticipate, could, estimate, likely, intend, may, plan,
expect, and similar expressions, including references to assumptions. These statements reflect
our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. We note
that a variety of factors and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ significantly
from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors and uncertainties that might
cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
| general economic, market or business conditions in Texas or Georgia, where our real estate activities are concentrated; | ||
| the opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to us and that we may pursue; | ||
| significant customer concentration; | ||
| future residential or commercial entitlements, development approvals and the ability to obtain such approvals; | ||
| accuracy of estimates and other assumptions related to investment in real estate, the expected timing and pricing of land and lot sales and related cost of real estate sales, impairment of long-lived assets, income taxes, share-based compensation and oil and natural gas reserves; | ||
| the levels of resale housing inventory and potential impact of foreclosures in our development projects and the regions in which they are located; | ||
| the development of relationships with strategic partners; | ||
| fluctuations in costs and expenses; | ||
| demand for new housing, which can be affected by a number of factors including the availability of mortgage credit; | ||
| supply of and demand for oil and natural gas and fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices; | ||
| competitive actions by other companies; |
17
Table of Contents
| changes in governmental policies, laws or regulations and actions or restrictions of regulatory agencies; | ||
| government regulation of exploration and production technology, including hydraulic fracturing; | ||
| the results of financing efforts, including our ability to obtain financing with favorable terms; | ||
| our partners ability to fund their capital commitments and otherwise fulfill their operating and financial obligations; | ||
| the effect of limitations, restrictions and natural events on our ability to harvest and deliver timber; | ||
| water withdrawal or usage may be subject to state and local laws, regulations or permit requirements, and there is no assurance that all our water interests or rights will be available for withdrawal or use; and | ||
| the final resolutions or outcomes with respect to our contingent and other liabilities related to our business. |
Other factors, including the risk factors described in Item 1A of our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by our
forward-looking statements. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to
predict all such factors, nor can we assess the impact of any such factor on our business or the
extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from
those contained in any forward-looking statement.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and,
except as required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any
updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the
date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Strategy
Our strategy is:
| Recognizing and responsibly delivering the greatest value from every acre; and | ||
| Growing through strategic and disciplined investments. |
In 2009, we announced our near-term strategic initiatives to enhance shareholder value by
generating significant cash flow, principally from the sale of 175,000 acres of higher and better
use (HBU) timberland; reducing debt by $150,000,000; and repurchasing up to 20 percent of our
common stock.
Since announcing these initiatives, we have sold 119,000 acres of timber and timberland in
Georgia, Alabama and Texas for $197,381,000 generating combined net proceeds of $191,891,000, which
were principally used to reduce debt, pay taxes, reinvest in qualifying real estate and repurchase
our common stock. These transactions resulted in a combined gain on sale of assets of $132,654,000.
In addition, in 2010, we repurchased 1,000,987 shares of our common stock at a cost of $15,178,000.
The repurchased shares are classified as treasury stock.
At second quarter-end 2011, assets held for sale under these strategic initiatives includes
65,000 acres of undeveloped land with a carrying value of $18,024,000 and related timber with a
carrying value of $7,564,000. We continue to actively market this land.
On August 5, 2011, we completed our previously announced sale of 50,000 acres of timber and
timberland in Georgia and Alabama to Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. for $75,000,000 in a cash
transaction.
18
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
A summary of our consolidated results by business segment follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
$ | 19,615 | $ | 21,549 | $ | 40,754 | $ | 38,797 | ||||||||
Mineral resources |
4,580 | 4,606 | 11,913 | 11,733 | ||||||||||||
Fiber resources |
1,290 | 1,982 | 2,658 | 3,965 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 25,485 | $ | 28,137 | $ | 55,325 | $ | 54,495 | ||||||||
Segment earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 2,454 | $ | 3,582 | $ | 2,766 | ||||||||
Mineral resources |
3,102 | 4,266 | 8,700 | 10,444 | ||||||||||||
Fiber resources |
704 | 1,085 | 1,344 | 2,528 | ||||||||||||
Total segment earnings |
4,813 | 7,805 | 13,626 | 15,738 | ||||||||||||
Items not allocated to segments: |
||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(7,081 | ) | (5,040 | ) | (10,997 | ) | (9,578 | ) | ||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
148 | (2,019 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (5,553 | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(4,653 | ) | (4,103 | ) | (8,662 | ) | (8,649 | ) | ||||||||
Other non-operating income |
24 | 246 | 51 | 444 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
(6,749 | ) | (3,111 | ) | (9,934 | ) | (7,598 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
2,828 | (162 | ) | 3,540 | 1,353 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Forestar Group Inc. |
$ | (3,921 | ) | $ | (3,273 | ) | $ | (6,394 | ) | $ | (6,245 | ) | ||||
Significant aspects of our results of operations follow:
Second Quarter and First Six Months 2011 and 2010
| Second quarter 2011 real estate segment earnings was negatively impacted by lower undeveloped land sales volume and prices as a result of current market conditions. Second quarter and first six months 2011 real estate earnings benefited from increased residential lot sales volume and prices and reallocation from us to noncontrolling financial interests of a previously recognized $1,342,000 loss related to foreclosure of a lien on a property owned by a consolidated venture, which partially offset lower levels of undeveloped land sales. | ||
| Second quarter and first six months 2011 mineral resources segment earnings declined primarily due to increased costs associated with developing our water resources initiatives. | ||
| Second quarter and first six months 2011 general and administrative expense includes $2,730,000 associated with proposed private debt offerings that we withdrew as a result of deterioration of terms available to us in the credit markets. | ||
| Second quarter and first six months 2011 share-based compensation decreased primarily due to the effect of our lower stock price associated with vested cash-settled awards. |
Current Market Conditions
Current U.S. market conditions in the single-family residential industry continue to be
difficult, characterized by product oversupply, low consumer confidence, depressed sales volumes
and prices, difficult financing environment for purchasers, and high unemployment rates. While all
markets are being negatively affected by overall poor economic conditions, not all geographic areas
and products have been affected to the same extent or with equal severity. These difficult market
conditions may continue throughout 2011. Multifamily market conditions are improving, with many
markets experiencing increased occupancy levels and positive rent growth. This improvement has been
driven primarily by limited new construction activity, reduced mortgage credit availability, and
the increased propensity to rent among the millenial generation of the U.S. population.
Oil prices have increased. This may be due to fears of supply disruptions and expectations
that global economic growth will tighten supplies. Natural gas prices have remained soft. Shale
resource drilling and production remains strong and working gas inventories are expected to remain
relatively high. In our area of operations in the East Texas Basin, exploration and production
companies continue to focus drilling on natural gas prospects in order to extend and hold existing
mineral leases. In the Gulf Coast Basin, in Louisiana, activity has increased as operators have
shifted exploration efforts to oil and high liquid natural gas plays. These conditions may impact
the demand for new mineral leases, new exploration activity and the amount of royalty revenues we
receive.
Pulpwood demand is relatively stable in our markets. Sawtimber prices remain depressed due to
decreased demand for lumber as a result of lower new home construction activity and overall higher
fiber inventories.
19
Table of Contents
Business Segments
We manage our operations through three business segments:
| Real estate, | ||
| Mineral resources, and | ||
| Fiber resources. |
We evaluate performance based on earnings (loss) before unallocated items and income taxes.
Segment earnings (loss) consist of operating income, equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated
ventures and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. Items not allocated to our
business segments consist of general and administrative expenses, share-based compensation, gain on
sale of assets, interest expense and other non-operating income and expense. The accounting
policies of the segments are the same as those described in the accounting policy note to the
consolidated financial statements.
We operate in cyclical industries. Our operations are affected to varying degrees by supply
and demand factors and economic conditions including changes in interest rates, availability of
mortgage credit, consumer and home builder sentiment, new housing starts, real estate values,
employment levels, changes in the market prices for oil, natural gas, and timber, and the overall
strength or weakness of the U.S. economy.
Real Estate
We own directly or through ventures over 217,000 acres of real estate located in nine states
and 12 markets. Our real estate segment secures entitlements and develops infrastructure on our
lands, primarily for single-family residential and mixed-use communities. We own 165,000 acres in a
broad area around Atlanta, Georgia, with the balance located primarily in Texas. We target
investments principally in our strategic growth corridors, regions across the southern half of the
United States that possess key demographic and growth characteristics that we believe make them
attractive for long-term real estate investment. We own and manage our projects either directly or
through ventures. Our real estate segment revenues are principally derived from the sales of
residential single-family lots, undeveloped land and commercial real estate and to a lesser degree
from the operation of income producing properties, primarily a hotel and a multifamily property.
A summary of our real estate results follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 19,615 | $ | 21,549 | $ | 40,754 | $ | 38,797 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
(10,357 | ) | (11,407 | ) | (20,527 | ) | (21,878 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
(8,633 | ) | (7,057 | ) | (16,347 | ) | (13,851 | ) | ||||||||
625 | 3,085 | 3,880 | 3,068 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated ventures |
(23 | ) | (406 | ) | 66 | (138 | ) | |||||||||
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
405 | (225 | ) | (364 | ) | (164 | ) | |||||||||
Segment earnings |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 2,454 | $ | 3,582 | $ | 2,766 | ||||||||
In second quarter and first six months 2011, cost of sales include a $450,000 non-cash
impairment charge related to a residential real estate project located near Dallas, Texas. In
second quarter and first six months 2010, cost of sales include a $900,000 non-cash impairment
charge related to a residential real estate project located near Salt Lake City, Utah.
In second quarter and first six months 2011, segment earnings include a benefit of $1,342,000
associated with reallocation of a previously recognized loss related to foreclosure of a lien on a
property owned by a consolidated venture. Based on new information, we determined this loss should
be allocated from us to the noncontrolling financial interests as we believe the likelihood we will
be subject to any potential lender liabilities is remote.
Revenues in our owned and consolidated ventures consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate |
$ | 9,360 | $ | 7,938 | $ | 17,227 | $ | 13,828 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
736 | | 736 | 157 | ||||||||||||
Undeveloped land |
2,480 | 8,207 | 8,570 | 12,910 | ||||||||||||
Income producing properties |
6,812 | 5,076 | 13,747 | 11,233 | ||||||||||||
Other |
227 | 328 | 474 | 669 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 19,615 | $ | 21,549 | $ | 40,754 | $ | 38,797 | ||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Residential real estate revenues principally consist of the sale of single-family lots to
national, regional and local homebuilders. In second quarter and first six months 2011, residential
real estate revenues increased principally as a result of increased lot sales volume due to demand
for finished lot inventory by homebuilders in markets where supply has diminished and increased
prices due to a higher mix of larger lots sold.
In second quarter and first six months 2011, undeveloped land sales decreased due to lower
volume and prices from our retail land sales program as a result of current market conditions
primarily resulting from limited credit availability, low consumer confidence and alternate
investment options to buyers in the marketplace.
In second quarter and first six months 2011, income producing properties revenue principally
increased as a result of our fourth quarter 2010 acquisition of a 401 unit multifamily property
located in Houston, Texas.
Units sold in our owned and consolidated ventures consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Lots sold |
158 | 149 | 303 | 251 | ||||||||||||
Revenue per lot sold |
$ | 59,235 | $ | 53,037 | $ | 56,853 | $ | 54,823 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Acres sold |
4.0 | | 4.0 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
Revenue per acre sold |
$ | 185,344 | $ | | $ | 185,344 | $ | 121,705 | ||||||||
Undeveloped land: |
||||||||||||||||
Acres sold |
762 | 1,473 | 3,390 | 3,561 | ||||||||||||
Revenue per acre sold |
$ | 3,258 | $ | 5,573 | $ | 2,528 | $ | 3,626 |
In second quarter and first six months 2010, revenue per acre sold from undeveloped land
was positively impacted as a result of selling 703 acres of land in the entitlement process in
Georgia for $8,200 per acre.
Operating expenses consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Property taxes |
$ | 2,277 | $ | 2,096 | $ | 4,461 | $ | 4,184 | ||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
1,896 | 1,434 | 3,837 | 3,130 | ||||||||||||
Professional services |
1,265 | 892 | 2,231 | 1,434 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,314 | 633 | 2,594 | 1,546 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,881 | 2,002 | 3,224 | 3,557 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 8,633 | $ | 7,057 | $ | 16,347 | $ | 13,851 | ||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits and professional services increased principally due to
developing and staffing our multifamily organization. Depreciation and amortization increased
primarily as a result of the acquisition of a 401 unit multifamily property in fourth
quarter 2010.
21
Table of Contents
Information about our real estate projects and our real estate ventures follows:
Second Quarter-End | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Owned and consolidated ventures: |
||||||||
Entitled, developed and under development projects |
||||||||
Number of projects |
53 | 53 | ||||||
Residential lots remaining |
18,763 | 17,914 | ||||||
Commercial acres remaining |
1,811 | 1,774 | ||||||
Undeveloped land and land in the entitlement process |
||||||||
Number of projects |
17 | 18 | ||||||
Acres in entitlement process |
28,650 | 29,670 | ||||||
Acres undeveloped (a) |
166,626 | 195,388 | ||||||
Ventures accounted for using the equity method: |
||||||||
Ventures lot sales (for first six months) |
||||||||
Lots sold |
194 | 179 | ||||||
Average price per lot sold |
$ | 40,882 | $ | 43,059 | ||||
Ventures entitled, developed and under development projects |
||||||||
Number of projects |
21 | 22 | ||||||
Residential lots remaining |
9,440 | 11,403 | ||||||
Commercial acres sold (for first six months) |
20 | 15 | ||||||
Average price per acre sold |
$ | 152,460 | $ | 65,727 | ||||
Commercial acres remaining |
538 | 818 | ||||||
Ventures undeveloped land and land in the entitlement process |
||||||||
Number of projects |
| | ||||||
Acres in entitlement process |
| | ||||||
Acres sold (for first six months) |
19 | | ||||||
Average price per acre sold |
$ | 3,000 | $ | | ||||
Acres undeveloped |
5,712 | 5,517 |
(a) | Includes 65,000 acres classified as assets held for sale at second quarter-end 2011 and 74,000 acres at second quarter-end 2010. |
We underwrite development projects based on a variety of assumptions incorporated into our
development plans, including the timing and pricing of lot sales and commercial parcels, and costs
to complete development. Our development plans are periodically reviewed in comparison to our
return projections and expectations, and we may revise our plans as business conditions warrant. If
as a result of changes to our development plans the anticipated future net cash flows are reduced
such that our basis in a project is not fully recoverable, we may be required to recognize a
non-cash impairment charge for such project.
Mineral Resources
We own directly or through ventures 603,000 net acres of mineral interests. Our mineral
resources segment revenues are principally derived from royalties and other revenues from our oil
and natural gas mineral interests located principally in Texas, Louisiana, Georgia and Alabama. At
second quarter-end 2011, we have 64,000 net acres under lease and 30,000 net acres held by
production from 501 oil and natural gas wells owned and operated by exploration and production
companies.
A summary of our mineral resources results follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 4,580 | $ | 4,606 | $ | 11,913 | $ | 11,733 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
(438 | ) | (307 | ) | (1,232 | ) | (629 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
(1,459 | ) | (726 | ) | (2,888 | ) | (1,456 | ) | ||||||||
2,683 | 3,573 | 7,793 | 9,648 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated ventures |
419 | 693 | 907 | 796 | ||||||||||||
Segment earnings |
$ | 3,102 | $ | 4,266 | $ | 8,700 | $ | 10,444 | ||||||||
Cost of sales represents our share of oil and natural gas production severance taxes,
which are calculated based on a percentage of oil and natural gas produced, costs related to our
oil and gas non-operating working interests and delay rental payments related to ground water
leases in central Texas.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures includes our share of royalty revenue from
producing wells in the Barnett Shale natural gas formation.
22
Table of Contents
Revenues consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 3,827 | $ | 3,821 | $ | 7,632 | $ | 7,325 | ||||||||
Other revenues |
753 | 785 | 4,281 | 4,408 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 4,580 | $ | 4,606 | $ | 11,913 | $ | 11,733 | ||||||||
In second quarter and first six months 2011, royalty revenues increased as a result of
higher oil prices partially offset by decreases in natural gas prices and production in owned and
consolidated properties. In second quarter 2011, changes in net oil and natural gas prices
contributed $582,000 which was essentially offset by decreases in net oil and natural gas
production of $576,000 as compared to second quarter 2010. In first six months 2011, changes in net
oil and natural gas prices contributed $739,000 which was partially offset by decreases in natural
gas production of $425,000 as compared to first six months 2010.
In second quarter 2011, other revenues include $475,000 in lease bonus payments as a result of
leasing over 2,500 net mineral acres for an average of $187 per acre, of which 1,500 net mineral
acres had no lease bonus payment in return for a short-term drilling commitment from the operator.
In addition, other revenues include delay rental payments of $70,000 in second quarter 2011 and
$762,000 in second quarter 2010.
In first six months 2011, other revenues include $2,132,000 in lease bonus payments as a
result of leasing nearly 7,400 net mineral acres for an average of $289 per acre, $1,555,000
related to mineral seismic exploration agreement associated with 31,100 acres in Louisiana and
$226,000 related to delay rental payments. In first six months 2010, other lease revenues include
$3,185,000 in lease bonus payments as a result of leasing over 2,100 net mineral acres for an
average of $1,495 per acre in the East Texas Basin and $1,194,000 related to delay rental payments.
Oil and natural gas produced and average unit prices related to our royalty interests follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated entities: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil production (barrels) |
27,900 | 30,500 | 59,900 | 59,900 | ||||||||||||
Average price per barrel |
$ | 102.23 | $ | 74.78 | $ | 91.69 | $ | 73.05 | ||||||||
Natural gas production (millions of cubic feet) |
246.0 | 327.6 | 554.1 | 647.5 | ||||||||||||
Average price per thousand cubic feet |
$ | 3.96 | $ | 4.71 | $ | 3.87 | $ | 4.55 | ||||||||
Our share of ventures accounted for using the equity method: |
||||||||||||||||
Natural gas production (millions of cubic feet) |
127.6 | 180.9 | 286.2 | 207.6 | ||||||||||||
Average price per thousand cubic feet |
$ | 3.84 | $ | 4.50 | $ | 3.69 | $ | 4.40 | ||||||||
Total consolidated and our share of equity method ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil production (barrels) |
27,900 | 30,500 | 59,900 | 59,900 | ||||||||||||
Average price per barrel |
$ | 102.23 | $ | 74.78 | $ | 91.69 | $ | 73.05 | ||||||||
Natural gas production (millions of cubic feet) |
373.6 | 508.5 | 840.3 | 855.1 | ||||||||||||
Average price per thousand cubic feet |
$ | 3.92 | $ | 4.63 | $ | 3.81 | $ | 4.52 |
At second quarter-end 2011, there were 501 active wells owned and operated by others on
our leased mineral acres compared to 482 wells at second quarter-end 2010.
In first six months 2011, our share of ventures natural gas production increased as a result
of 16 wells that began producing from the Barnett Shale natural gas formation in 2010.
Operating expenses consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Professional and consulting services |
$ | 649 | $ | 115 | $ | 1,293 | $ | 237 | ||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
429 | 312 | 882 | 581 | ||||||||||||
Property taxes |
74 | 74 | 150 | 147 | ||||||||||||
Other |
307 | 225 | 563 | 491 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 1,459 | $ | 726 | $ | 2,888 | $ | 1,456 | ||||||||
Professional and consulting services increased $429,000 in second quarter and $857,000 in
first six months 2011 due to non-cash amortization of contingent consideration paid to the seller
of a water resources company acquired in fourth quarter 2010. These costs are being amortized
ratably over the performance period assuming certain milestones are achieved by July 2014.
23
Table of Contents
In addition, we have water interests in 1,600,000 acres, including a 45 percent
nonparticipating royalty interest in groundwater produced or withdrawn for commercial purposes or
sold from 1,400,000 acres in Texas, Louisiana, Georgia and Alabama and 17,800 acres of ground water
leases in central Texas. We have not received significant income from these interests.
Fiber Resources
Our fiber resources segment focuses principally on the management of our timber holdings and
recreational leases. We own directly or through ventures 201,000 acres of timber, primarily in
Georgia, and 17,000 acres of timber under lease. Our fiber resources segment revenues are
principally derived from the sales of wood fiber from our land and leases for recreational uses. We
sold over 140,000 acres of undeveloped land in 2010 and 2009 through our retail land sales program
and as a result of our strategic initiatives. In addition, we are delaying harvest plans and
actively marketing 65,000 acres classified as held for sale. As a result of the reduced acreage
from executing these land sales, future segment revenues and earnings are anticipated to be lower.
A summary of our fiber resources results follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,290 | $ | 1,982 | $ | 2,658 | $ | 3,965 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
(285 | ) | (391 | ) | (532 | ) | (742 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
(488 | ) | (506 | ) | (974 | ) | (1,192 | ) | ||||||||
517 | 1,085 | 1,152 | 2,031 | |||||||||||||
Other operating income |
181 | | 181 | 497 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures |
6 | | 11 | | ||||||||||||
Segment earnings |
$ | 704 | $ | 1,085 | $ | 1,344 | $ | 2,528 | ||||||||
Other operating income represents gains from partial termination of timber leases.
Revenues consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Fiber |
$ | 852 | $ | 1,526 | $ | 1,717 | $ | 3,030 | ||||||||
Recreational leases and other |
438 | 456 | 941 | 935 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 1,290 | $ | 1,982 | $ | 2,658 | $ | 3,965 | ||||||||
Fiber sold consists of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Pulpwood tons sold |
70,700 | 95,600 | 136,300 | 178,700 | ||||||||||||
Average pulpwood price per ton |
$ | 9.22 | $ | 10.89 | $ | 9.20 | $ | 10.90 | ||||||||
Sawtimber tons sold |
12,700 | 23,800 | 28,200 | 53,400 | ||||||||||||
Average sawtimber price per ton |
$ | 15.69 | $ | 20.36 | $ | 16.40 | $ | 20.24 | ||||||||
Total tons sold |
83,400 | 119,400 | 164,500 | 232,100 | ||||||||||||
Average price per ton |
$ | 10.21 | $ | 12.78 | $ | 10.44 | $ | 13.05 |
In second quarter and first six months 2011, total fiber tons sold decreased principally
due to the sale of about 30,000 acres of timberland in 2010. The majority of our fiber sales were
to Temple-Inland at market prices.
Information about our recreational leases follows:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Average recreational acres leased |
197,000 | 213,000 | 199,000 | 213,000 | ||||||||||||
Average price per leased acre |
$ | 8.96 | $ | 8.16 | $ | 8.93 | $ | 8.16 |
24
Table of Contents
Operating expenses consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
$ | 231 | $ | 231 | $ | 468 | $ | 684 | ||||||||
Facility and long-term timber lease costs |
109 | 117 | 227 | 190 | ||||||||||||
Other |
148 | 158 | 279 | 318 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 488 | $ | 506 | $ | 974 | $ | 1,192 | ||||||||
Items Not Allocated to Segments
Unallocated items represent income and expenses managed on a company-wide basis and include
general and administrative expenses, share-based compensation, gain on sale of assets, interest
expense and other non-operating income and expense. General and administrative expenses principally
consist of accounting and finance, tax, legal, human resources, internal audit, information
technology and our board of directors. These functions support all of our business segments and are
not allocated.
General and administrative expenses consist of:
Second Quarter | First Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Professional services |
$ | 3,686 | $ | 1,320 | $ | 4,425 | $ | 2,082 | ||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
1,372 | 1,347 | 2,827 | 2,735 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
351 | 372 | 702 | 742 | ||||||||||||
Insurance costs |
289 | 324 | 533 | 641 | ||||||||||||
Facility costs |
173 | 314 | 384 | 611 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,210 | 1,363 | 2,126 | 2,767 | ||||||||||||
Total general and administrative expenses |
$ | 7,081 | $ | 5,040 | $ | 10,997 | $ | 9,578 | ||||||||
In second quarter and first six months 2011, professional services include $2,730,000 of
expenses associated with proposed private debt offerings that we withdrew as a result of
deterioration in terms available to us in the capital markets.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was a 40 percent benefit in second quarter 2011 and a 37 percent
benefit in first six months 2011, which includes a 2 percent non-cash charge for share-based
compensation. Our effective tax rate was 6 percent in second quarter 2010 and an 18 percent benefit
in first six months 2010, which included a 23 percent benefit attributable to noncontrolling
interests. In addition, 2011 and 2010 effective tax rates include the effect of state income taxes,
nondeductible items, noncontrolling interests and benefits of percentage depletion.
We have not provided a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset because we believe it is
likely it will be recoverable in future periods.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Sources and Uses of Cash
We operate in cyclical industries and our cash flows fluctuate accordingly. Our principal
operating cash requirements are for the acquisition and development of real estate, either directly
or indirectly through ventures, taxes, interest and compensation. Our principal sources of cash are
proceeds from the sale of real estate and timber, the cash flow from minerals and income producing
properties, borrowings, and reimbursements from utility and improvement districts. Operating cash
flows are affected by the timing of the payment of real estate development expenditures and the
collection of proceeds from the eventual sale of the real estate, the timing of which can vary
substantially depending on many factors including the size of the project, state and local
permitting requirements and availability of utilities, and by the timing of oil and natural gas
leasing and production activities. Working capital is subject to operating needs, the timing of
sales of real estate and timber, the timing of collection of mineral royalties or mineral lease
payments, collection of receivables, reimbursement from utility and improvement districts and the
payment of payables and expenses.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from our real estate development activities, undeveloped land sales, income
producing properties, timber sales, mineral and recreational leases and reimbursements from utility
and improvement districts are classified as operating cash flows.
In first six months 2011, net cash (used for) operating activities was ($33,930,000) which is
principally due to our acquisition from a financial institution of a non-performing loan secured by
a lien on 900 acres of developed and undeveloped land near Houston,
Texas
25
Table of Contents
for $21,137,000, our investment in undeveloped land in San Antonio, Texas for $7,900,000 and
our payment of $7,596,000 in federal and state income taxes, net of refunds. In first six months
2010, net cash (used for) operating activities was ($18,873,000) principally consisting of funding
a $10,000,000 loan to a third-party equity investor in the JW Marriott ® San Antonio
Hill Country Resort & Spa and income taxes of $10,986,000.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital contributions to and capital distributions from unconsolidated ventures and business
acquisitions are classified as investing activities. In addition, proceeds from the sale of
property and equipment, software costs and expenditures related to reforestation activities are
also classified as investing activities.
In first six months 2011, net cash (used for) investing activities was ($3,501,000) and is
principally related to $2,112,000 invested in oil and gas properties as non-operating working
interests, $883,000 in net contributions to unconsolidated ventures and $899,000 in property,
equipment, software and reforestation. In first six months 2010, net cash provided by investing
activities was $4,955,000. We received $2,602,000 in proceeds related to the sale of our undivided
interest in corporate aircraft and $3,745,000 in net distributions from our unconsolidated
ventures.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
In first six months 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $37,780,000. The net
increase in our debt of $39,236,000 was principally used to fund our expenditures for acquisitions
and development. In first six months 2010, net cash (used for) financing activities was ($774,000)
as our repayments of debt principally offset our additions to debt.
Liquidity
On February 23, 2011, we supplemented our amended and restated senior credit facility to add a
new lender to the revolving loan and to the term loan increasing the aggregate commitment by
$30,000,000. We incurred fees of $270,000 related to this additional commitment. In addition, on
May 6, 2011, we amended our senior secured credit facility to provide us with additional
flexibility and to make certain technical and other changes. We incurred fees of $583,500 related
to this amendment.
At second quarter-end 2011, our senior credit facility provides for a $130,000,000 term loan
and a $200,000,000 revolving line of credit. The term loan matures August 6, 2015, and the
revolving line of credit matures August 6, 2013 (with a one-year extension option to August 6,
2014). The term loan includes a 2 percent prepayment penalty for payments in excess of $25,000,000
prior to August 6, 2011 and 1 percent prepayment penalty prior to February 6, 2012 and no
prepayment penalty thereafter. The revolving line of credit may be prepaid at any time without
penalty. At second quarter-end 2011, we had $111,386,000 in net unused borrowing capacity under our
senior credit facility. Our unused borrowing capacity during first six months 2011 ranged from a
high of $168,113,000 to a low of $111,386,000. This facility is used primarily to fund our
operating cash needs, which fluctuate due to timing of residential real estate sales, undeveloped
land sales, mineral lease bonus payments, timber sales, payment of payables and expenses and
capital expenditures.
Our senior credit facility and other debt agreements contain financial covenants customary for
such agreements including minimum levels of interest coverage and limitations on leverage. At
second quarter-end 2011, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of these agreements.
The following table details our compliance with the financial covenants calculated as provided
in the senior credit facility:
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | ||||||||
Financial Covenant | Requirement | 2011 | ||||||
Interest Coverage Ratio (a) |
≥ 1.05:1.0 | 3.57:1.0 | ||||||
Revenues/Capital Expenditures Ratio (b) |
≥ 1.00:1.0 | 3.39:1.0 | ||||||
Total Leverage Ratio (c) |
≤ 40 | % | 24 | % | ||||
Net Worth (d) |
> $411 million | $500 million | ||||||
Collateral Value to Loan Commitment Ratio (e) |
≥ 1.60:1.0 | 2.00 :1.0 |
(a) | Calculated as EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), plus non-cash compensation expense, plus other non-cash expenses, divided by interest expense excluding loan fees. This covenant is applied at the end of each quarter on a rolling four quarter basis. | |
(b) | Calculated as total gross revenues, plus our pro rata share of the operating revenues from unconsolidated ventures, divided by capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are defined as consolidated development and acquisition expenditures plus our pro rata share of unconsolidated ventures development and acquisition expenditures. This covenant is applied at the end of each quarter on a rolling four quarter basis. |
26
Table of Contents
(c) | Calculated as total funded debt divided by adjusted asset value. Total funded debt includes indebtedness for borrowed funds, secured liabilities and reimbursement obligations with respect to letters of credit or similar instruments. Adjusted asset value is defined as the sum of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, timberlands, high value timberlands, raw entitled lands, entitled land under development, minerals business, other real estate owned at book value without regard to any indebtedness and our pro rata share of joint ventures book value without regard to any indebtedness. This covenant is applied at the end of each quarter. | |
(d) | Calculated as the amount by which consolidated total assets exceeds consolidated total liabilities. At second quarter-end 2011, the requirement is $411,000,000, computed as: $411,000,000, plus 85 percent of the aggregate net proceeds received by us from any equity offering, plus 75 percent of all positive net income, on a cumulative basis. This covenant is applied at the end of each quarter. | |
(e) | Calculated as the total collateral value of timberland, high value timberland and our minerals business, divided by total aggregate loan commitment. This covenant is applied at the end of each quarter. |
To make additional investments, acquisitions, or distributions, we must maintain available
liquidity equal to the lesser of $35,000,000 or 10% of the aggregate commitments in place. At
second quarter-end 2011, this requirement was $33,000,000 resulting in $115,066,000 in available
liquidity, which represents our unused borrowing capacity under our senior credit facility plus
unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. The failure to maintain such minimum liquidity does not
constitute a default or event of default of our senior credit facility.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In second quarter 2011, we began construction on a 289 unit multifamily project in Austin,
Texas in which the estimated cost at completion, including land, is approximately $30,540,000. At
second quarter-end 2011, our investment in this project is $5,961,000 and is included in real
estate on our balance sheet.
At second quarter-end 2011, we participate in three partnerships that have total assets of
$51,504,000 and total liabilities of $82,740,000, which includes $67,532,000 of borrowings
classified as current maturities. These partnerships are managed by third parties who intend to
extend or refinance these borrowings; however, there is no assurance that this can be done.
Although these borrowings are guaranteed by third parties, we may under certain circumstances elect
or be required to provide additional equity to these partnerships. We do not believe that the
ultimate resolution of these matters will have a significant effect on our earnings or financial
position. Our investment in these partnerships is $2,751,000 at second quarter-end 2011. These
three partnerships are variable interest entities.
Cibolo Canyons San Antonio, Texas
Cibolo Canyons consists of the JW Marriott ® San Antonio Hill Country Resort & Spa
development owned by third parties and a mixed-use development we own. We have $87,288,000 invested
in Cibolo Canyons at second quarter-end 2011.
Resort Hotel, Spa and Golf Development
In 2007, we entered into agreements to facilitate third party construction and ownership of
the JW Marriott ® San Antonio Hill Country Resort & Spa, which includes a 1,002 room
destination resort and two PGA Tour ® Tournament Players Club ® (TPC) golf
courses. Under these agreements, we agreed to transfer to third party owners 700 acres of
undeveloped land, to provide $30,000,000 cash and to provide $12,700,000 of other consideration
principally consisting of golf course construction materials, substantially all of which has been
provided.
In exchange for our commitment to the resort, the third party owners assigned to us certain
rights under an agreement between the third party owners and a legislatively created Special
Improvement District (SID). This agreement includes the right to receive from the SID 9 percent of
hotel occupancy revenues and 1.5 percent of other resort sales revenues collected as taxes by the
SID through 2034. The amount we receive will be net of annual ad valorem tax reimbursements by the
SID to the third party owners of the resort through 2020. In addition, these payments will be net
of debt service, if any, on bonds issued by the SID collateralized by hotel occupancy tax and other
resort sales tax through 2034.
The amounts we collect under this agreement are dependent on several factors including the
amount of revenues generated by and ad valorem taxes imposed on the resort and the amount of any
applicable debt service incurred by the SID. As a result, there is significant uncertainty as to
the amount and timing of collections under this agreement. Until these uncertainties are clarified,
amounts collected under the agreement will be accounted for as a reduction of our investment in the
resort development. The resort began operations on January 22, 2010.
In second quarter 2011, we received $1,603,000 from the SID related to hotel
occupancy revenues and other revenues from resort sales collected as taxes by the SID. To date, we
have received $2,603,000 in reimbursements and have accounted for this as a reduction of our
investment. At second quarter-end 2011, we have $40,399,000 invested in the resort development.
27
Table of Contents
Mixed-Use Development
The mixed-use development we own consists of 2,100 acres planned to include approximately
1,420 residential lots and 220 commercial acres designated for multifamily and retail uses, of
which 679 lots and 68 commercial acres have been sold through second quarter-end 2011.
In 2007, we entered into an agreement with the SID providing for reimbursement of certain
infrastructure costs related to the mixed-use development. Reimbursements are subject to review and
approval by the SID and unreimbursed amounts accrue interest at 9.75 percent. The SIDs funding for
reimbursements is principally derived from its ad valorem tax collections and bond proceeds
collateralized by ad valorem taxes, less debt service on these bonds and annual administrative and
public service expenses. Through second quarter-end 2011, we have submitted and received approval
for reimbursement of approximately $57,322,000 of infrastructure costs and have received
reimbursements totaling $20,770,000. At second quarter-end 2011, we have $36,552,000 in approved
and pending reimbursements, excluding interest.
Since the amount of each reimbursement is dependent on several factors, including timing of
SID approval and the SID having an adequate tax base to generate funds that can be used to
reimburse us, there is uncertainty as to the amount and timing of reimbursements under this
agreement. We expect to recover our investment from lot and tract sales and reimbursement of
approved infrastructure costs from the SID. We have not recognized income from interest due, but
not collected. As these uncertainties are clarified, we will modify our accounting accordingly.
At second quarter-end 2011, we have $46,889,000 invested in the mixed-use development.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies or estimates from
those disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Standards
Please read Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q.
28
Table of Contents
Statistical and Other Data
A summary of our real estate projects in the entitlement process (a) at
second quarter-end 2011 follows:
Project | ||||||||
Project | County | Market | Acres (b) | |||||
California |
||||||||
Hidden Creek Estates |
Los Angeles | Los Angeles | 700 | |||||
Terrace at Hidden Hills |
Los Angeles | Los Angeles | 30 | |||||
Georgia |
||||||||
Ball Ground |
Cherokee | Atlanta | 500 | |||||
Crossing |
Coweta | Atlanta | 230 | |||||
Dallas Highway |
Haralson | Atlanta | 1,060 | |||||
Fincher Road |
Cherokee | Atlanta | 3,890 | |||||
Fox Hall |
Coweta | Atlanta | 960 | |||||
Garland Mountain |
Cherokee/Bartow | Atlanta | 350 | |||||
Home Place |
Coweta | Atlanta | 1,510 | |||||
Martins Bridge |
Banks | Atlanta | 970 | |||||
Mill Creek |
Coweta | Atlanta | 770 | |||||
Serenity |
Carroll | Atlanta | 440 | |||||
Waleska |
Cherokee | Atlanta | 100 | |||||
Wolf Creek |
Carroll/Douglas | Atlanta | 12,230 | |||||
Yellow Creek |
Cherokee | Atlanta | 1,060 | |||||
Texas |
||||||||
Lake Houston |
Harris/Liberty | Houston | 3,700 | |||||
San Jacinto |
Montgomery | Houston | 150 | |||||
Total |
28,650 | |||||||
(a) | A project is deemed to be in the entitlement process when customary steps necessary for the preparation of an application for governmental land-use approvals, like conducting pre-application meetings or similar discussions with governmental officials, have commenced, or an application has been filed. Projects listed may have significant steps remaining, and there is no assurance that entitlements ultimately will be received. | |
(b) | Project acres, which are the total for the project regardless of our ownership interest, are approximate. The actual number of acres entitled may vary. |
29
Table of Contents
A summary of activity within our projects in the development process, which includes
entitled (a), developed and under development real estate projects, at second
quarter-end 2011 follows:
Residential Lots (c) | Commercial Acres (d) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lots Sold | Acres Sold | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Since | Lots | Since | Acres | ||||||||||||||||||||
Project | County | Market | Owned (b) | Inception | Remaining | Inception | Remaining (f) | |||||||||||||||||
Projects we own |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
California |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Joaquin River |
Contra Costa/ Sacramento | Oakland | 100 | % | | | | 288 | ||||||||||||||||
Colorado |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buffalo Highlands |
Weld | Denver | 100 | % | | 164 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Johnstown Farms |
Weld | Denver | 100 | % | 115 | 493 | 2 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Pinery West |
Douglas | Denver | 100 | % | | | | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Stonebraker |
Weld | Denver | 100 | % | | 603 | | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
Texas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arrowhead Ranch |
Hays | Austin | 100 | % | | 259 | | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Caruth Lakes |
Rockwall | Dallas/Fort Worth | 100 | % | 332 | 317 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Cibolo Canyons |
Bexar | San Antonio | 100 | % | 679 | 736 | 68 | 153 | ||||||||||||||||
Harbor Lakes |
Hood | Dallas/Fort Worth | 100 | % | 202 | 247 | 2 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
Hunters Crossing |
Bastrop | Austin | 100 | % | 351 | 139 | 38 | 71 | ||||||||||||||||
La Conterra |
Williamson | Austin | 100 | % | 76 | 424 | | 58 | ||||||||||||||||
Maxwell Creek |
Collin | Dallas/Fort Worth | 100 | % | 718 | 281 | 10 | | ||||||||||||||||
Oak Creek Estates |
Comal | San Antonio | 100 | % | 89 | 558 | 13 | | ||||||||||||||||
The Colony |
Bastrop | Austin | 100 | % | 413 | 734 | 22 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||
The Gables at North Hill |
Collin | Dallas/Fort Worth | 100 | % | 199 | 84 | | | ||||||||||||||||
The Preserve at Pecan Creek |
Denton | Dallas/Fort Worth | 100 | % | 316 | 502 | | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
The Ridge at Ribelin Ranch |
Travis | Austin | 100 | % | | | 179 | | ||||||||||||||||
Westside at Buttercup Creek |
Williamson | Austin | 100 | % | 1,367 | 147 | 66 | | ||||||||||||||||
Other projects (9) |
Various | Various | 100 | % | 1,555 | 18 | 197 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Villages at Burt Creek |
Dawson | Atlanta | 100 | % | | 1,715 | | 57 | ||||||||||||||||
Towne West |
Bartow | Atlanta | 100 | % | | 2,674 | | 121 | ||||||||||||||||
Other projects (13) |
Various | Atlanta | 100 | % | | 2,834 | | 705 | ||||||||||||||||
Missouri and Utah |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other projects (2) |
Various | Various | 100 | % | 464 | 90 | | | ||||||||||||||||
6,876 | 13,019 | 597 | 1,671 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Projects in entities we consolidate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
City Park |
Harris | Houston | 75 | % | 1,166 | 145 | 50 | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Lantana |
Denton | Dallas/Fort Worth | 55 | % (e) | 683 | 1,586 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Light Farms |
Collin | Dallas/Fort Worth | 65 | % | | 2,501 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Stoney Creek |
Dallas | Dallas/Fort Worth | 90 | % | 109 | 645 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Timber Creek |
Collin | Dallas/Fort Worth | 88 | % | | 614 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other projects (4) |
Various | Various | Various | 710 | 253 | 26 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||
2,668 | 5,744 | 76 | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total owned and consolidated |
9,544 | 18,763 | 673 | 1,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Projects in ventures that we
account for using the equity method |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seven Hills |
Paulding | Atlanta | 50 | % | 640 | 441 | 26 | 113 | ||||||||||||||||
The Georgian |
Paulding | Atlanta | 38 | % | 289 | 1,096 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other projects (3) |
Various | Atlanta | Various | 1,710 | 77 | 3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Texas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bar C Ranch |
Tarrant | Dallas/Fort Worth | 50 | % | 265 | 934 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Entrada |
Travis | Austin | 50 | % | | 821 | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Fannin Farms West |
Tarrant | Dallas/Fort Worth | 50 | % | 323 | 58 | | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
Harpers Preserve |
Montgomery | Houston | 50 | % | 13 | 1,712 | | 72 | ||||||||||||||||
Lantana |
Denton | Dallas/Fort Worth | Various (e) | 1,436 | 96 | 14 | 44 | |||||||||||||||||
Long Meadow Farms |
Fort Bend | Houston | 19 | % | 758 | 1,325 | 107 | 113 | ||||||||||||||||
Southern Trails |
Brazoria | Houston | 40 | % | 468 | 559 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Stonewall Estates |
Bexar | San Antonio | 25 | % | 280 | 108 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Summer Creek Ranch |
Tarrant | Dallas/Fort Worth | 50 | % | 796 | 478 | | 71 | ||||||||||||||||
Summer Lakes |
Fort Bend | Houston | 50 | % | 373 | 757 | 56 | | ||||||||||||||||
Village Park |
Collin | Dallas/Fort Worth | 50 | % | 356 | 215 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Waterford Park |
Fort Bend | Houston | 50 | % | | 210 | | 90 | ||||||||||||||||
Other projects (2) |
Various | Various | Various | 297 | 227 | | 15 | |||||||||||||||||
Florida |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other projects (3) |
Various | Tampa | Various | 519 | 326 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total in ventures |
8,523 | 9,440 | 209 | 538 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Combined total |
18,067 | 28,203 | 882 | 2,349 | ||||||||||||||||||||
30
Table of Contents
(a) | A project is deemed entitled when all major discretionary governmental land-use approvals have been received. Some projects may require additional permits and/or non-governmental authorizations for development. | |
(b) | Interest owned reflects our net equity interest in the project, whether owned directly or indirectly. There are some projects that have multiple ownership structures within them. Accordingly, portions of these projects may appear as owned, consolidated or accounted for using the equity method. | |
(c) | Lots are for the total project, regardless of our ownership interest. Lots remaining represent vacant developed lots, lots under development and future planned lots and are subject to change based on business plan revisions. | |
(d) | Commercial acres are for the total project, regardless of our ownership interest, and are net developable acres, which may be fewer than the gross acres available in the project. | |
(e) | The Lantana project consists of a series of 20 partnerships in which our voting interests range from 25 percent to 55 percent. We account for three of these partnerships using the equity method and we consolidate the remaining partnerships. | |
(f) | Excludes acres associated with commercial and income producing properties. |
A summary of our significant commercial and income producing properties at second quarter-end
2011 follows:
Interest | ||||||||||||||||
Project | County | Market | Owned(a) | Type | Acres | Description | ||||||||||
Broadstone Memorial |
Harris | Houston | 100 | % | Multifamily | 9 | 401 unit luxury apartment | |||||||||
Radisson Hotel |
Travis | Austin | 100 | % | Hotel | 2 | 413 guest rooms and suites | |||||||||
Palisades West |
Travis | Austin | 25 | % | Office | 22 | 375,000 square feet | |||||||||
Las Brisas |
Williamson | Austin | 59 | % | Multifamily | 30 | 414 unit luxury apartment | |||||||||
The Ridge at Ribelin Ranch |
Travis | Austin | 100 | % | Multifamily | 16 | 289 unit luxury apartment (construction in progress) |
(a) | Interest owned reflects our net equity interest in the project, whether owned directly or indirectly. |
A summary of our oil and gas mineral interests (a) at second quarter-end
2011 follows:
Held By | ||||||||||||||||
State | Unleased | Leased (b) | Production (c) | Total (d) | ||||||||||||
(Net acres) | ||||||||||||||||
Texas |
186,000 | 41,000 | 25,000 | 252,000 | ||||||||||||
Louisiana |
116,000 | 23,000 | 5,000 | 144,000 | ||||||||||||
Georgia |
165,000 | | | 165,000 | ||||||||||||
Alabama |
40,000 | | | 40,000 | ||||||||||||
California |
1,000 | | | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Indiana |
1,000 | | | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
509,000 | 64,000 | 30,000 | 603,000 | |||||||||||||
(a) | Includes ventures. | |
(b) | Includes leases in primary lease term or for which a delay rental payment has been received. In the ordinary course of business, leases covering a significant portion of leased net mineral acres may expire from time to time in a single reporting period. | |
(c) | Acres being held by production are producing oil or natural gas in paying quantities. | |
(d) | Texas, Louisiana, California and Indiana net acres are calculated as the gross number of surface acres multiplied by our percentage ownership of the mineral interest. Alabama and Georgia net acres are calculated as the gross number of surface acres multiplied by our estimated percentage ownership of the mineral interest based on county sampling. Excludes 477 net mineral acres located in Colorado including 379 acres leased and 29 acres held by production. |
31
Table of Contents
A summary of our Texas and Louisiana mineral acres (a) by county or
parish at second quarter-end 2011 follows:
Texas | Louisiana | |||||||||
County | Net Acres | Parish | Net Acres | |||||||
Trinity |
46,000 | Beauregard |
79,000 | |||||||
Angelina |
42,000 | Vernon |
39,000 | |||||||
Houston |
29,000 | Calcasieu |
17,000 | |||||||
Anderson |
25,000 | Allen |
7,000 | |||||||
Cherokee |
24,000 | Rapides |
1,000 | |||||||
Sabine |
23,000 | Other |
1,000 | |||||||
Red River |
14,000 | 144,000 | ||||||||
Newton |
13,000 | |||||||||
San Augustine |
13,000 | |||||||||
Jasper |
12,000 | |||||||||
Other |
11,000 | |||||||||
252,000 | ||||||||||
(a) | Includes ventures. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk is principally related to our variable-rate debt. Interest rate changes
impact earnings due to the resulting increase or decrease in the cost of our variable-rate debt,
which is $230,894,000 at second quarter-end 2011 and $191,658,000 at year-end 2010.
The following table illustrates the estimated effect on our pre-tax income of immediate,
parallel, and sustained shifts in interest rates for the next 12 months on our variable-rate debt
at second quarter-end 2011, with comparative year-end 2010 information. This estimate assumes that
debt reductions from contractual payments will be replaced with short-term, variable-rate debt;
however, that may not be the financing alternative we choose.
Second | ||||||||
Quarter-End | Year-End | |||||||
Change in Interest Rates | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
+2% |
$ | (4,287 | ) | $ | (3,728 | ) | ||
+1% |
(2,309 | ) | (1,917 | ) | ||||
-1% |
2,309 | 1,917 | ||||||
-2% |
4,618 | 3,833 |
Foreign Currency Risk
We have no exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.
Commodity Price Risk
We have no significant exposure to commodity price fluctuations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or
the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such
period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing
and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
32
Table of Contents
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term
is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by
this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved directly or through ventures in various legal proceedings that arise from time
to time in the ordinary course of doing business. We believe we have established adequate reserves
for any probable losses and that the outcome of any of the proceedings should not have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, long-term results of operations or cash flows. It is
possible, however, that circumstances beyond our control or significant subsequent developments
could result in additional charges related to these matters that could be significant to results of
operations or cash flow in any single accounting period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on
Form 10-K, except as follows:
If the Temple-Inland mill complex in Rome, Georgia were to permanently cease operations, the price
we receive for our wood fiber may decline, and the cost of delivering logs to alternative customers
could increase.
Prior to our 2007 spin-off from Temple-Inland Inc. (Temple-Inland), we entered into an
agreement to sell wood fiber to Temple-Inland at market prices, primarily for use at
Temple-Inlands Rome, Georgia mill complex. The agreement expires in 2013, although the purchase
and sale commitments (including the sale price) are established annually based on our annual
harvest plan. A significant portion of our fiber resources revenues are generated though this
agreement. The Temple-Inland Rome mill complex is a significant consumer of wood fiber within the
immediate area in which a substantial portion of our Georgia timberlands are located. If
Temple-Inland was to permanently cease operations at its Rome, Georgia mill complex (although we
have no indication that it intends to do so), was not willing to pay for wood fiber at a price we
deem acceptable or was to cease purchasing wood fiber from us after the expiration of our agreement
in 2013, we may not be able to enter into agreements with alternative customers for the wood fiber,
any agreements with alternative customers we do enter into may be for lower rates than we currently
receive from Temple-Inland and the cost of delivering wood fiber to such alternative customers
could increase.
Our ability to harvest and deliver timber may be affected by our sales of timberland and may be
subject to other limitations, which could adversely affect our operations.
As of August 8, 2011, we have sold 169,000 acres of our timberland in accordance with our
near-term strategic initiatives announced in 2009, and we own directly or through ventures about
151,000 acres of timberland. Sales of our timberland reduce the amount of timber that we
have available for harvest.
In addition, weather conditions, timber growth cycles, access limitations, availability of
contract loggers and haulers, and regulatory requirements associated with the protection of
wildlife and water resources may restrict harvesting of timberlands as may other factors, including
damage by fire, insect infestation, disease, prolonged drought, flooding and other natural
disasters. Although damage from such natural causes usually is localized and affects only a limited
percentage of the timber, there can be no assurance that any damage affecting our timberlands will
in fact be so limited. As is common in the forest products industry, we do not maintain insurance
coverage with respect to damage to our timberlands.
The revenues, income and cash flow from operations for our fiber resources segment are
dependent to a significant extent on the pricing of our products and our continued ability to
harvest timber at adequate levels.
33
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)
Maximum | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number | Number of | |||||||||||||||
of Shares | Shares That | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as | May Yet be | |||||||||||||||
Total | Average | Part of Publicly | Purchased | |||||||||||||
Number of | Price | Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||
Shares | Paid per | Plans or | Plans | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased(b) | Share | Programs | or Programs | ||||||||||||
Month 1 (4/1/2011 4/30/2011) |
| $ | | | 5,999,013 | |||||||||||
Month 2 (5/1/2011 5/31/2011) |
1,461 | $ | 17.78 | | 5,999,013 | |||||||||||
Month 3 (6/1/2011 6/30/2011) |
18 | $ | 15.80 | | 5,999,013 | |||||||||||
Total |
1,479 | $ | 17.76 | | ||||||||||||
(a) | On February 11, 2009, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 7,000,000 shares of our common stock. We have purchased 1,000,987 shares under this authorization, which has no expiration date. We have no repurchase plans or programs that expired during the period covered by the table above and no repurchase plans or programs that we intend to terminate prior to expiration or under which we no longer intend to make further purchases. | |
(b) | Represents shares withheld to pay taxes in connection with vesting of restricted stock awards and exercises of stock options. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving and Term Credit Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2011, by and among Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group Inc., certain wholly-owned subsidiaries signatory thereto, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 31, 2011). | |
31 .1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31 .2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 .1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 .2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.1
|
The following materials from Forestars Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
34
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FORESTAR GROUP INC. |
||||
Date: August 8, 2011 | By: | /s/ Christopher L. Nines | ||
Christopher L. Nines | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
By: | /s/ Charles D. Jehl | |||
Charles D. Jehl | ||||
Chief Accounting Officer |
35