FRANKLIN COVEY CO - Annual Report: 2006 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-K
þ
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2006
|
|
OR
|
||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSISTION PERIOD FROM ___ TO ___ |
Franklin
Covey Co.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Utah
|
1-11107
|
87-0401551
|
||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer Commission File No.)
|
2200
West Parkway Boulevard
Salt
Lake City, Utah 84119-2331
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (801) 817-1776
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class
|
Name
of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common
Stock, $.05 Par Value
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities
registered pursuant ot Section 12(g) of the Act:
Series
A Preferred Stock, no par value
Title
of Class
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes oNo
þ
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required
to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant ot Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best
of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment
to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See deifinition of
"accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
oLarge accelerated filer | þAccelerated filer | oNon-accelerated filer |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
þ
As
of
February 24, 2006, the aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common
Stock
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $126.3
million.
As
of
November 1, 2006, the Registrant had 19,678,591 shares of Common Stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts
of
the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, which is scheduled to be held on January 19, 2007, are
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
AUGUST
31, 2006
Table
of Contents
|
|
|
|
Part I. | |||
Item 1. | Business | ||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | ||
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | ||
Item 2. | Properties | ||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | ||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vot of Security Holers | ||
Part II. | |||
Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | ||
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | ||
Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | ||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | ||
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | ||
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures | ||
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | ||
Item 9B. | Other Information | ||
Part III. | |||
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | ||
Item 11. | Executive Compensation | ||
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | ||
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | ||
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services | ||
Part IV. | |||
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | ||
Signatures | |||
Exhibit 21 | Franklin Covey Co. Subsidiaries | ||
Exhibit 23 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | ||
Exhibit 31.1 |
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer
|
||
Exhibit 31.2 |
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Exhibit 32 |
Section
1350 Certifications
|
||
Exhibit 99.1 |
Report
of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,
on
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule for the years ended
August 31,
2006, 2005, and 2004
|
||
Exhibit 99.2 | Financial Statement Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves |
PART
I
ITEM
1.
|
Business
|
General
Franklin
Covey Co. (the Company, we, us, our or FranklinCovey) influences organizations,
families and individuals the world over by helping them achieve their
own great
purposes through teaching the principles and practices of effectiveness
and by
providing reinforcement tools like the FranklinCovey Planning System.
Nearly
1,500 FranklinCovey associates world-wide delivered timeless and universal
curriculum and effectiveness tools to more than five million customers
in fiscal
2006. We strive to excel in this endeavor because we believe that:
l
|
People
are
inherently capable, aspire to greatness, and have the power
to
choose.
|
|
l
|
Principles
are
timeless and universal and are the foundation to lasting
effectiveness.
|
|
l
|
Leadership
is
a choice, built inside out on a foundation of character.
Great leaders
unleash the collective talent and passion of people toward
the right
goal.
|
|
l
|
Habits
of effectiveness come
only from the committed use of integrated processes and
tools.
|
|
l
|
Sustained
superior performance requires
a balance of performance and performance capability (P/PC
Balance®)
- a focus on achieving results and building capability.
|
The
Opportunity
Corporations,
organizations and individuals cumulatively purchased more than $13
billion1
in 2006
and estimated to purchase more than $15 billion in 2007 professional
performance
training curricula, books, tapes, CD’s and other tools in an effort to improve
their effectiveness and productivity. The training industry is divided
into two
segments - IT training and performance skills training. The performance
skills
training segment of the industry represented an estimated $7 billion
in sales in
2006 and is expected to grow to nearly $9 billion in 2007 through
sales of
hundreds of different curricula, delivered to both corporations and
individual
customers. In addition to training, the performance skills industry
includes a
number of measurement methodologies and integrated implementation
tools. The
measurement methodologies include return on investment analysis and
behavior
modification measurement. Implementation tools are designed to increase
learning
retention and increase behavior modification. Many companies in the
industry
specialize in only one or two of these areas.
____________________________
1 Simba
Information, Corporate Training Market 2006: Forecast and Analysis.
(2006)
FranklinCovey
is engaged in the performance skills industry. FranklinCovey’s competitive
advantage in this highly fragmented industry stems from our fully integrating
training curricula, measurement methodologies and implementation tool
offerings
to help individuals and organizations measurably improve their effectiveness.
This advantage allows FranklinCovey to deliver not only training to
both
corporations and individuals, but also to implement the training through
the use
of powerful behavior changing tools and then measure the impact of
that
training.
In
fiscal
2006, we provided products and services to 90 of the Fortune 100 companies
and
more than 75 percent of the Fortune 500 companies. We also provide
products and
services to a number of U.S. and foreign governmental agencies, including
the
U.S. Department of Defense, as well as numerous educational institutions.
We
provide training curricula, measurement services and implementation
tools
internationally, either through directly operated offices, or through
licensed
providers. At August 31, 2006, we had direct operations in Australia,
Brazil,
Canada, Japan, Mexico and the United Kingdom. We also had licensed
operations in
75 countries and licensed rights in more than 130 countries. More
than 450,000
individuals were trained during the fiscal year ended August 31,
2006.
Unless
the context requires otherwise, all references to the Company, we,
us, our or to
FranklinCovey herein refer to Franklin Covey Co. and each of its operating
divisions and subsidiaries. The Company's principal executive offices
are
located at 2200 West Parkway Boulevard, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119-2331
and our
telephone number is (801) 817-1776.
FranklinCovey
Products
An
important principle taught in our productivity training is to have
a single
personal productivity system and to have all of one’s information in that
system. Based upon that principle, we developed the FranklinCovey Planning
System with the original Franklin Planner as one of the basic tools
for
implementing the principles of our time management system. The Franklin
Planner
consists of paper-based FranklinCovey Planning Pages, a binder in which
to carry
it, weekly, monthly and annual calendars as well as personal management
sections. We offer a broad line of renewal planning pages, forms and
binders in
various sizes and styles. The FranklinCovey Planning System broadened
as
we
developed additional planning tools to address the needs of more technology
oriented workers as well as those who require both greater mobility
and ready
access to large quantities of data. For
those
clients who use digital or electronic productivity systems, we offer
a wide
variety of electronic solutions incorporating the same planning
methodology.
FrankinCovey
Planning Pages.
Paper
planning pages are available for the FranklinCovey Planning System
in various
sizes and styles and consist of daily or weekly formats, with Appointment
Schedules, Prioritized Daily Task Lists, Monthly Calendars, Daily Notes,
and
personal management pages for an entire year. FranklinCovey Planning
Pages are
offered in a number of designs to appeal to various customer segments.
The
Starter Pack, which includes personal management tabs and pages, a
guide to
using the planner, a pagefinder and weekly compass cards, combined
with a
storage binder, completes the basic FranklinCovey Planning System.
Binders. To
further customize the FranklinCovey Planning System, we offer binders
and
business cases (briefcases, portfolios, business totes, messenger bags,
etc.) in
a variety of materials, styles and sizes. These materials include high
quality
leathers, fabrics, synthetic materials and vinyl in a variety of color
and
design options. Binder styles include zipper closures, snap closures,
and open
formats with pocket configurations to accommodate credit cards, business
cards,
checkbooks, electronic devices and writing instruments. Most of the
leather
items are proprietary FranklinCovey designs. However, we also offer
products
from leading manufacturers such as Kenneth Cole.
Electronic
Solutions.
We
offer our time and life management methodology in an electronic format
within a
complete Personal Information Management (“PIM”) system through the
FranklinCovey PlanPlusÔ Software
offerings. The software application can be used in conjunction with
planning
pages, electronic handheld organizers or used as a stand-alone planning
and
information management system. The FranklinCovey PlanPlus Software
permits users
to generate and print data on FranklinCovey Planning Pages that can
be inserted
directly into the FranklinCovey Planner. The program operates in the
Windows®
95, 98, 2000, NT and XP operating systems. The FranklinCovey PlanPlus
Software
includes all necessary software, related tutorials and reference manuals.
FranklinCovey
PlanPlusÔ
Software
is also intended for our corporate clients that have already standardized
on
MicrosoftÒ
for
group scheduling, but wish to make the FranklinCovey Planning System
available
to their employees without creating the need to support two separate
systems. As
this kind of extension proves its value in the market, the FranklinCovey
Planning Software extension model may be expanded to other
platforms.
We
are an
OEM provider of the PalmOneÔ
handheld
devices, which has become another successful planning tool for which
we provide
FranklinCovey Planning Software and sell through our FranklinCovey
channels. In
an effort to combine the functionality of paper and the capabilities
of the
PalmÒ,
we
introduced products that can add paper-based planning to these electronic
planners as well as binders and carrying cases specific to the
PalmOneÔ
product
line. We have also expanded the handheld line to include other electronic
organizers with the FranklinCovey Planning Software such as the iPAQÔ
Pocket
PC from Hewlett-Packard® and the TrioÔ
by
Handspring®, now part of PalmOneÔ.
We
also
provide The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People®
training course in online and CD-ROM versions. This edition delivers
the content
from the 3-day classroom workshop in a flexible self-paced version
via the
Internet or CD-ROM that is available when and where employees need
it. The
Online Edition is presented in a multi-media format with video segments,
voiceovers, a learning journal, interactive exercises, and other techniques.
Included with the course is a 360-Degree profile and e-Coaching to
help
participants gain a broader perspective of their strengths and weaknesses
and to
help them implement the training to improve their skills.
The
FranklinCovey Planning System is also available for the Tablet PC through
FranklinCovey PlanPlus for Windows XP software. The software was developed
in
cooperation with Agilix Labs and includes the following features: screen
views
similar to the paper-based FranklinCovey Planner, natural handwriting
interface,
the full FranklinCovey Planning System with appointment scheduling,
prioritized
daily and master tasks and daily notes, digital note-taking and synchronization
with Outlook Exchange and an e-Binder concept allowing for the collection
of all
important documents into one place.
Personal
Development and Accessory Products.
To
supplement our principal products, we offer a number of accessories
and related
products, including third-party books, videotapes and audio cassettes
focused on
time management, leadership, personal improvement and other topics.
We also
market a variety of content-based personal development products. These
products
include books, audio learning systems such as multi-tape, CDs and workbook
sets,
CD-ROM software products, calendars and other specialty name brand
items. We
offer numerous accessory forms through our Forms Wizard software, which
allows
customization of our more popular forms, including check registers,
spreadsheets, stationery, mileage logs, maps, menu planners, shopping
lists and
other information management and project planning forms. Our accessory
products
and forms are generally available in all the FranklinCovey
Planner
sizes.
Books.
The
principles we teach in our curriculum have also been published in book,
audiotape and CD formats. Books to which the Company holds copyrights
include
The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People®,
Principle-Centered Leadership, First Things First, The 7 Habits of
Highly
Effective Families, Nature of Leadership, Living
the 7 Habits, and
the
latest
book, The
8th
Habit:
From Effectiveness to Greatness
all by
Stephen R. Covey, The
10 Natural Laws of Time and Life Management, What
Matters Most
and
The
Modern Gladiator
by Hyrum
W. Smith, The
Power Principle
by
Blaine Lee, The
7
Habits of Highly Effective Teens
by Sean
Covey and Business
Think
by Dave
Marcum and Steve Smith. These books, as well as audiotape and CD audio
versions
of many of these products, and the products mentioned above are sold
through
general retail channels, as well as through our own catalog, our e-commerce
Internet site at www.franklincovey.com
and our
retail stores.
Training
and Consulting Services
We
offer
training and consulting services for organizations through a combination
of
assessment instruments, including the xQ
(Execution QuotientÔ)
Profile
and the 7 Habits Profile, and training courses including FOCUS:
Achieving Your Highest Priorities™;
The
4
Disciplines of Execution™;
The
4
Roles of Leadership™;
and
The
7
Habits of Highly Effective PeopleÒ.
We
measure the impact of training investments for our clients through
pre- and
post- assessment profiles and return on investment analysis. These
services are
marketed and delivered world-wide through our Organizational Solutions
Business
Unit (OSBU), which consists of consultants, selected through a competitive
and
demanding process, and sales professionals.
Training
and Education Programs.
We
offer a range of training programs designed to measurably improve the
effectiveness of individuals and organizations. Our programs are oriented
to
address personal, interpersonal, managerial and organizational needs.
In
addition, we believe that our learning process provides an engaging
and
behavior-changing experience, which frequently generates additional
business.
During fiscal year 2006, more than 450,000 individuals were trained
using the Company’s curricula in its single and multiple-day workshops and
seminars. We also offer assessment tools to help organizational clients
determine the effectiveness of implementing company goals. The xQ Survey
is an
exclusive FranklinCovey assessment tool that gathers information, from
an
employee perspective, on how well organizational goals are understood
and are
being carried out. The survey questions, administered through a Web-based
system, probe for details to uncover underlying focus and teamwork
barriers or
issues.
Our
single-day FOCUS:
Achieving Your Highest Priorities workshop
teaches productivity skills integrated with a planning system to help
individuals clarify, focus on, and execute their highest priorities,
both
personally and professionally. This seminar is conducted by our training
consultants for employees of clients and in public seminars throughout
the
United States and in many foreign countries. The single-day The
4
Disciplines of Execution
workshop
helps managers identify the highest priorities for their teams and
then lead
those teams to execute tasks day-after-day.
We
also
deliver multiple-day workshops, primarily in the leadership area. Included
in
these offerings is the three-day 7 Habits workshop based upon the material
presented in The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People®.
The 7
Habits workshop provides the foundation for continued client relationships
and
the content and application tools are designed to be delivered deep
into the
client’s organization. Additionally, a three-day 4
Roles of Leadership
course
is offered, which focuses on the managerial aspects of client needs.
FranklinCovey Leadership Week consists of a five-day session focused
on
materials from FranklinCovey's
The
7 Habits of Highly Effective People®
and
The
4
Roles of Leadership
courses.
FranklinCovey Leadership Week is reserved for supervisory level management
of
our corporate clients. As a part of the week's agenda, executive participants
plan and design strategies to successfully implement key organizational
goals or
initiatives.
In
addition to providing consultants and presenters, we also train and
certify
client facilitators to teach selected FranklinCovey workshops within
their
organizations. We believe client-facilitated training is important
to our
fundamental strategy of creating pervasive on-going client impact and
revenue
streams. After having been certified, client facilitators can purchase
manuals,
profiles, planners and other products to conduct training workshops
within their
organization, generally without repeating the sales process. This creates
programs which have an on-going impact on our customers and which generate
annuity-type revenues. This is aided by the fact that curriculum content
in one
course leads the client to additional participation in other Company
courses.
Since 1988, we have trained more than 20,000 client facilitators. Client
facilitators are certified only after graduating from one of our certification
workshops and completing post-course certification requirements.
In
April
2002, we introduced The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People®
training
course in online and CD-ROM versions. The need for reaching more employees
faster and more inexpensively are the key drivers behind the growth
of
e-learning in the marketplace. The 7 Habits Online Edition addresses
that need,
offering a flexible alternative to classroom training.
Segment
Information
To
help
us fulfill our mission of enabling greatness in people and organizations
everywhere, we have organized our business in two segments: (1) the
Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU) designed to reach individual
consumers; and (2) the Organizational Solutions Business Unit (OSBU)
designed to
serve organizational clients. The following table sets forth, for the
periods
indicated, the Company's revenue from external customers for each of
its
operating segments (in thousands):
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit
|
||||||||||
Retail
Stores
|
$
|
62,440
|
$
|
74,331
|
$
|
87,922
|
||||
Consumer
Direct
|
63,681
|
62,873
|
60,091
|
|||||||
Wholesale
|
19,783
|
19,691
|
21,081
|
|||||||
Other
|
4,910
|
3,757
|
2,007
|
|||||||
Total
CSBU
|
150,814
|
160,652
|
171,101
|
|||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit
|
||||||||||
Domestic
|
71,108
|
68,816
|
56,015
|
|||||||
International
|
56,701
|
54,074
|
48,318
|
|||||||
Total
OSBU
|
127,809
|
122,890
|
104,333
|
|||||||
Total
|
$
|
278,623
|
$
|
283,542
|
$
|
275,434
|
We
market
products and services to organizations, schools and individuals both
domestically and internationally through FranklinCovey retail stores,
our
consumer direct channel (which includes catalog operations, our Internet
website at www.franklincovey.com
and public seminar programs),
our
organizational and educational sales forces and other distribution
channels. Our
quarterly results of operations reflect seasonal trends that are primarily
the
result of customers who renew their FranklinCovey Planners on a calendar
year
basis. Domestic training sales are moderately seasonal because of the
timing of corporate training, which is not typically scheduled as heavily
during
holiday and vacation periods. Additional financial information related to
our operating segments, as well as geographical information can be
found in the
notes to our consolidated financial statements (Note 18).
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit
We
sell
FranklinCovey products and other productivity tools to individual consumers
through our company-owned retail stores, through FranklinCovey consumer
direct
channels, and through selected wholesale channels.
Retail
Stores.
Beginning in late 1985, we began a retail strategy by opening retail
stores in
areas of high client density. The initial stores were generally located
in close
proximity to corporate clients. We revised our strategy by locating
retail
stores in high-traffic retail centers, primarily large shopping centers
and
malls, to serve existing clients and to attract increased numbers of
walk-in
clients. Our retail stores average approximately 1,900 square feet.
Our retail
strategy focuses on reinforcing the training experience with high client
service
and consultative sales of planning tools. We believe this approach
ensures
longer-term usage and satisfaction with the FranklinCovey Planning
System.
We
believe that our retail stores have an upscale image consistent with
our
marketing strategy. Products are attractively presented and displayed
with an
emphasis on integration of related products and accessories. Our retail
sales
associates have been trained to teach the FranklinCovey Planning System,
using
the various tools and electronic handheld devices and software we offer,
enabling them to assist and advise clients in the selection and use of our
products.
Retail
store employees have also been engaged to proactively market to small
businesses
in the cities where they are located. Their marketing efforts include
calling
upon small (fewer than 100 employees) businesses to offer productivity
tools and
training. This
out-bound selling effort has helped to stabilize declining revenues
in the
retail channel and provided access to FranklinCovey training and products
to a
business segment not traditionally marketed to through the Company’s sales
force.
At
August
31, 2006, FranklinCovey had 89 domestic retail stores located in 33
states. We
closed 16 retail stores in the United States during fiscal year 2006.
These
closures were primarily comprised of under-performing stores. The Company
anticipates that it may close additional stores in fiscal year 2007.
Consumer
Direct.
Our
Consumer Direct channel consists of sales through catalog call-in
operations, Internet sales operations and public seminar programs. We
periodically mail catalogs to our clients, including a fall catalog,
holiday
catalogs, spring and summer catalogs timed to coincide with planner
renewals.
Catalogs may be targeted to specific geographic areas or user groups
as
appropriate. Catalogs are typically printed in full color with an attractive
selling presentation highlighting product benefits and features. We
also market
the FranklinCovey Planning System through our e-commerce Internet site
at
www.franklincovey.com.
Customers may order catalogs and other marketing materials as well
as the
Company’s product line through this Internet portal.
During
fiscal 2001, we entered into a long-term contract with Electronic Data
Systems
(EDS) of Dallas, Texas, to provide a large part of our customer relationship
management in servicing our Consumer Direct customers through our catalog
and
e-commerce operations. We use EDS to maintain a client service department,
which
clients may call toll-free, from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. MST, Monday
through
Friday, to inquire about a product or to place an order. Through a
computerized
order entry system, client representatives have access to client preferences,
prior orders, billings, shipments and other information on a real-time
basis.
Each of the more than 65 customer service representatives has the authority
to
immediately solve client service problems. The
integrated relationship management system provided by EDS allows orders
from our
customers to be processed through its warehousing and distribution
systems.
Client information stored within the order entry system is also used
for
additional purposes, including target marketing of specific products
to existing
clients. We believe that the order entry system helps assure client
satisfaction
through both rapid delivery and accurate order shipment.
Our
Consumer Direct channel includes public seminar
sales. Public seminars are planned and coordinated with training consultants
by
a staff of marketing and administrative personnel at the Company's
corporate
offices. The seminars are delivered by our training consultants in
more than 100
major metropolitan cities throughout the United States. These seminars
provide
training for organizations and the general public and are also used
as a
marketing tool for attracting corporate and other institutional clients.
Corporate training directors are often invited to attend public seminars
to
preview the seminar content prior to engaging FranklinCovey to train
in-house
employees. Smaller institutional clients often enroll their employees
in public
seminars when a private seminar is not cost effective.
Wholesale.
We have
an alliance with MeadWestvaco to sell our products through the contract
stationer channel. MeadWestvaco distributes our products to contract
stationer
businesses such as Office Express, Office Depot, Office Max and Staples,
which
sell office products through catalog order entry systems to businesses
and
organizations. MeadWestvaco also represents FranklinCovey in the office
superstore category by wholesaling the FranklinCovey Planning System
to Staples,
Office Depot and OfficeMax and represents us with Target Stores, for
which we
designed a specialty line of paper planning products branded under
the “365 by
FranklinCovey” under-brand label which is sold exclusively in their stores. We
also have a similar distribution agreement with Heritage Industries
in which
they sell select products into Sam’s, Costco, Office Depot, Office Max and
Staples stores and an under-brand label “DayOne by FranklinCovey” product line
that is sold through WalMart stores.
Other.
Other
sales included sales of printing services by FranklinCovey Printing, a
wholly-owned subsidiary, miscellaneous licensing rights of FranklinCovey
products and brands to various marketing customers, and sub-lease revenues
from
third-party tenants.
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit
Domestic
Training.
We
sell
effectiveness and productivity solutions to organizations and schools
through
our own direct sales forces. We then deliver training services to organizations,
schools and individuals in one of four ways:
1.
|
FranklinCovey
consultants provide on-site consulting or training classes
for
organizations and schools. In these situations, our consultant
can tailor
the curriculum to our client’s specific business and
objectives.
|
||
2.
|
We
conduct public seminars in 130 cities throughout the United
States, where
organizations can send their employees in smaller numbers.
These public
seminars are also marketed directly to individuals through
our catalog,
e-commerce web-site, retail stores, and by direct mail.
|
||
3.
|
Our
programs are also designed to be facilitated by licensed
professional
trainers and managers in client organizations, reducing dependence
on our
professional presenters, and creating continuing revenue
through royalties
and as participant materials are purchased for trainees by
these
facilitators.
|
||
4.
|
We
also offer The
7 Habits of Highly Effective People®
training course in online and CD-ROM formats. This self-paced
e-learning
alternative provides the flexibility that many organizations
need to meet
the needs of various groups, managers or supervisors who
may be unable to
attend extended classroom training and executives who need
a series of
working sessions over several
weeks.
|
FranklinCovey's
domestic training operations are organized in geographic regional sales
teams in
order to assure that both the consultant and the client sales professional
participate in the development of new business and the assessment of
client
needs. Consultants are then entrusted with the actual delivery of content,
seminars, processes and other solutions. Consultants follow up with
client
service teams, working with them to develop lasting client impact and
ongoing
business opportunities.
We
employ
103 sales professionals and business developers located in six major
metropolitan areas throughout the United States who sell integrated
offerings to
institutional clients. We also employ an additional 49 sales professionals
and
business developers outside of the United States in six countries.
Our sales
professionals have selling experience prior to employment by the Company
and are
trained and evaluated in their respective sales territories. Sales
professionals
typically call upon persons responsible for corporate employee training,
such as
corporate training directors or human resource officers. Increasingly,
sales
professionals also call upon line leaders. Our sales professionals
work closely
with training consultants in their territories to schedule and tailor
seminars
and workshops to meet specific objectives of institutional clients.
FranklinCovey
currently employs 109 training consultants in major metropolitan areas
of the
United States, with an additional 26 training consultants outside of
the United
States. Our training consultants are selected from a large number of
experienced
applicants. These consultants generally have several years of training
and/or
consulting experience and are known for their excellent presentation
skills.
Once selected, the training consultant goes through a rigorous training
program
including multiple live presentations. The training program ultimately
results
in the Company's certification of the consultant.
We
also
provide The
7
Habits of Highly Effective Teens™
as a
workshop or as a year-long curriculum to schools and school districts
and other
organizations working with youth. Based on The
7
Habits of Highly Effective Teens
book, it
helps to teach students and teachers studying skills, learning habits,
and
interpersonal development. In December 2001, we sold the stock of Premier
Agendas, a wholly owned subsidiary that previously delivered our products
and
services to schools, to School Specialty. Pursuant to a license from
FranklinCovey, Premier Agendas is expected to continue to expose over
20 million
K-12 students to FranklinCovey’s world-renowned 7
Habits content.
We retained the educator leadership and effectiveness training portion
of
Premier’s business.
International
Sales.
We
provide products, training and printing services internationally through
Company-owned and licensed operations. We have Company-owned operations
and
offices in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, Mexico and the United
Kingdom. We
also have licensed operations in Argentina, Austria, Bahamas, Bahrain,
Bangladesh, Belgium, Bermuda, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa
Rica,
Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt,
El
Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Guatemala,
Honduras, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Iceland, Indonesia, Israel, Italy,
Jordan,
Kuwait, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Nepal, Netherlands,
Netherland Antilles, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Paraguay,
Peru,
Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore,
Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka,
Sweden,
Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Trinidad/Tobago, Turkey, UAE, Ukraine,
Uruguay,
Venezuela, Vietnam and West Indies. There are also licensee retail
operations in
Hong Kong and South Korea. Our seven most popular books, The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People,
Principle-Centered
Leadership, The 10 Natural Laws of Time and Life Management, First
Things First, The Power Principle, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
Families and
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens are
currently published in multiple languages. Financial information about
our
foreign operations is contained in Note 18 to our consolidated financial
statements.
Strategic
Distribution Alliances
We
have
created strategic alliances with third-party organizations in an effort
to
develop effective distribution of our products and services. The principal
distribution alliances currently maintained by FranklinCovey are: Simon
& Schuster
and
Saint
Martin’s Press
in
publishing books for the Company; Nightingale-Conant
to
market and distribute audio and video tapes of the Company's book titles;
MeadWestvaco
to
market and distribute selected FranklinCovey Planners and accessories
through
the At-A-Glance catalog office supply channels and in the office superstores
channel; PalmOneÔ
to serve
as the official training organization for its PalmOneÔ
products; Agilix
Labs
in
development of the PlanPlus Software; Microsoft
in
conjunction with PlanPlus marketing; and Heritage
Travelware. Ltd.
to
market and distribute selected FranklinCovey products to Sams Club,
Costco and
WalMart.
Clients
We
have a
relatively broad base of institutional and individual clients. We have
more than
2,000 institutional clients consisting of corporations, governmental
agencies,
educational institutions and other organizations. We believe our products,
workshops and seminars encourage strong client loyalty. Employees in
each of our
distribution channels focus on providing timely and courteous responses
to
client requests and inquiries. Institutional clients may choose to
receive
assistance in designing and developing customized forms, tabs, pagefinders
and
binders necessary to satisfy specific needs. As a result of the nature
of
FranklinCovey’s business and distribution channels, the Company does not have,
nor has it had, a significant backlog of firm orders.
Competition
Training.
Competition in the performance skills organizational training and education
industry is highly fragmented with few large competitors. We estimate
that the
industry represents more than $6 billion in annual revenues and that
the largest
traditional organizational training firms have sales in the $100 million
to $400
million range. Based upon FranklinCovey's fiscal 2006 organizational
sales of
approximately $130 million, we believe we are a leading competitor
in the
organizational training and education market. Other significant competitors
in
the training market are Development Dimensions International, Institute
for
International Research (IIR) (formerly Achieve Global and Zenger Miller),
Organizational Dynamics Inc., Provant, Forum Corporation, EPS Solutions
and the
Center for Creative Leadership.
Products.
The
paper-based time management and personal organization products market
is
intensely competitive and subject to rapid change. FranklinCovey competes
directly with other companies that manufacture and market calendars,
planners,
personal organizers, appointment books, diaries and related products
through
retail, mail order and other sales channels. In this market, several
competitors
have strong name recognition. We believe our principal competitors
include
DayTimer, At-A-Glance and Day Runner. We also compete with companies
that market
substitutes for paper-based products, such as electronic organizers,
software,
PIM’s and handheld computers. Many FranklinCovey competitors, particularly
those
providing electronic organizers, software-based management systems,
and
hand-held computers, have access to marketing, product development,
financial
and other resources significantly in excess of those available to FranklinCovey.
An emerging potential source of competition is the appearance of calendars
and
event-planning services available at no charge on the Web. There is
no
indication that the current level of features has proven to be attractive
to the
traditional planner customer as a stand-alone service, but as these
products
evolve and improve, they could pose a competitive threat.
Given
the
relative ease of entry in FranklinCovey's product and training markets,
the
number of competitors could increase, many of whom may imitate existing
methods
of distribution, products and seminars, or offer similar products and
seminars
at lower prices. Some of these companies may have greater financial
and other
resources than us. We believe that the FranklinCovey Planning System
and related
products compete primarily on the basis of user appeal, client loyalty,
design,
product breadth, quality, price, functionality and client service.
We also
believe that the FranklinCovey Planning System has obtained market
acceptance
primarily as a result of the concepts embodied in it, the high quality
of
materials, innovative design, our attention to client service, and
the strong
loyalty and referrals of our existing clients. We believe that our
integration
of training services with products has become a competitive advantage.
Moreover,
we believe that we are a market leader in the United States among a
small number
of integrated providers of productivity and time management products and
services. Increased competition from existing and future competitors
could,
however, have a material adverse effect on our sales and
profitability.
Manufacturing
and Distribution
The
manufacturing operations of FranklinCovey consist primarily of printing,
collating, assembling and packaging components used in connection with
our paper
product lines.
We
operate
our central manufacturing services out of Salt Lake City, Utah. We
have also
developed partner printers, both domestically and internationally,
who can meet
our quality standards, thereby facilitating efficient delivery of product
in a
global market. We believe this has positioned us for greater flexibility
and
growth capacity. Automated production, assembly and material handling
equipment
are used in the manufacturing process to ensure consistent quality
of production
materials and to control costs and maintain efficiencies. By
operating in this fashion, we have gained greater control of production
costs,
schedules and quality control of printed materials.
During
fiscal 2001, we entered into a long-term contract with EDS to provide
warehousing and distribution services for our product line. EDS maintains
a
facility at the Company’s headquarters as well as at other locations throughout
North America.
Binders
used for our products are produced from either leather, simulated leather,
fabrics or other synthetic materials. These binders are produced by
multiple
product suppliers. We currently enjoy good relations with our suppliers
and
vendors and do not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining the required
binders
and materials needed for our business. We have implemented special
procedures to
ensure a high standard of quality for binders, most of which are manufactured
by
suppliers in the United States, Europe, Canada, Korea, Mexico and China.
We
also
purchase numerous accessories, including pens, books, videotapes, calculators
and other products, from various suppliers for resale to our clients.
These
items are manufactured by a variety of outside contractors located
in the United
States and abroad. We do not believe that we are materially dependent
on any one
or more of such contractors and consider our relationships with such
suppliers
to be good.
Research
and Development
FranklinCovey
believes that the development of new products and curricula are important
to
maintaining its competitive position. Our
products and services are conceived, designed and developed through
the
collaboration of our internal innovations group and external partner
organizations. We focus our product design efforts on both improving
our
existing products and developing new products. We intend to continue
to employ a
customer focused design approach to provide innovative products and
curricula
that respond to and anticipate customer needs for functionality, productivity
and effectiveness.
We
expense in the same year incurred part of the costs to develop new
curricula and
products. Curriculim costs are only capitalized when a course is developed
that will result in significant future benefits or when there is a
major
revision to a course or course materials. Our research and development
expenditures totaled $2.3 million, $2.2 million, and $3.6 million in
fiscal
years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and capitalized curriculum
costs totaled $4.0 million, $2.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively,
for the same years.
Trademarks,
Copyrights and Intellectual Property
We
seek
to protect our intellectual property through a combination of trademarks,
copyrights and confidentiality agreements. We claim rights for 128
trademarks in
the United States and have obtained registration in the United States
and many
foreign countries for many of our trademarks, including
FranklinCovey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, Principle-Centered
Leadership,
The
4
Disciplines of Execution,
FranklinCovey
Planner,
PlanPlus,
The
7
Habits and The 8th
Habit.
We
consider our trademarks and other proprietary rights to be important
and
material to our business. Each of the marks set forth in italics above
is a
registered mark or a mark for which protection is claimed.
We
own
sole or joint copyrights on our planning systems, books, manuals, text
and other
printed information provided in our training seminars, the programs
contained
within FranklinCovey Planner Software and its instructional materials,
and our
software and electronic products, including audio tapes and video tapes.
We
license, rather than sell, all facilitator workbooks and other seminar
and
training materials in order to protect our intellectual property rights
therein.
FranklinCovey places trademark and copyright notices on its instructional,
marketing and advertising materials. In order to maintain the proprietary
nature
of our product information, FranklinCovey enters into written confidentiality
agreements with certain executives, product developers, sales professionals,
training consultants, other employees and licensees. Although we believe
the
protective measures with respect to our proprietary rights are important,
there
can be no assurance that such measures will provide significant protection
from
competitors.
Employees
As
of
August 31, 2006, FranklinCovey had 1,237 full and part-time associates,
including 539 in sales, marketing and training; 343 in customer service
and
retail; 113 in production operations and distribution; and 242 in administration
and support staff. During fiscal 2002, the Company outsourced a significant
part
of its information technology services, customer service, distribution
and
warehousing operations to EDS. A number of the Company’s former employees
involved in these operations are now employed by EDS to provide those
services
to FranklinCovey. None of our associates are represented by a union
or other
collective bargaining group. Management believes that its relations
with its
associates are good and we do not currently foresee a shortage in qualified
personnel needed to operate our business.
Available
Information
The
Company's principal executive offices are located at 2200 West Parkway
Boulevard, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119-2331 and our telephone number
is (801)
817-1776.
We
regularly file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). These
reports include, but are not limited to, Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and security transaction
reports on Forms 3, 4, or 5. The public may read and copy any materials
that the
Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information
on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The
SEC also maintains electronic versions of the Company’s reports on its website
at www.sec.gov.
The
Company makes our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on Form 8-K, and other reports filed or furnished with
the SEC
available to the public, free of charge, through our website at www.franklincovey.com.
These
reports are provided through our website as soon as reasonably practicable
after
we file or furnish these reports with the SEC.
ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors |
Our
business environment, current domestic and international economic
conditions,
and other specific risks may affect our future business decisions
and financial
performance. The matters discussed below may cause our future
results to differ
from past results or those described in forward-looking statements
and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
liquidity,
results of operations, and stock price, and should be considered
in evaluating
the Company.
The
following list of potential risks to the Company is not exhaustive.
Additional
business risks and uncertainties that are not presently known
to us or that are
not currently believed to be material may also harm our business
operations and
financial results.
We
operate in highly competitive industries
The
training and consulting industry and planner product industry
are highly
competitive with relatively easy entry. Competitors continually
introduce new
programs and products that may compete directly with our offerings.
Larger and
better capitalized competitors may have superior abilities
to compete for
clients and skilled professionals. In addition, one or more
of our competitors
may develop and implement training courses or methodologies
that may adversely
affect our ability to sell our methodologies to new clients.
We
have experienced net losses in recent fiscal years and we may
not be able to
maintain consistent profitability
Although
we reported net income in fiscal 2006, we have experienced
significant net
losses in recent years. While we continue to implement initiatives
designed to
increase our sales, reduce costs, and otherwise improve our
operating results,
and have recognized significant improvements in recent years,
we cannot assure
you that we will return to consistently profitable operations.
During
previous years we have faced numerous challenges that have
affected our
operating results. Specifically, we have experienced, and may
continue to
experience the following:
·
|
Declining
traffic in our retail stores and consumer direct
channel
|
|
·
|
Increased
risk of excess and obsolete inventories
|
|
·
|
Operating
expenses that, as a percentage of sales, have exceeded
our desired
business model
|
|
·
|
Costs
associated with exiting unprofitable or underperforming
retail
stores
|
In
addition, if we are unable to maintain profitable operations
we may be required
to reestablish valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets
if it becomes
more likely than not that we would not be able to realize the
benefits of those
assets. The reestablishment of deferred tax assets would have
an unfavorable
impact upon our reported net income.
If
we do not achieve the appropriate cost structure our profitability
could
decrease
Our
future success and profitability depend in part on our ability
to achieve the
appropriate cost structure and be efficient in the highly competitive
training,
consulting, and planner industries. We are currently developing
and implementing
profit-enhancing initiatives and business models that impact
our operations and
are designed to improve our profitability. Our recent initiatives
have included
exiting non-core businesses, recapitalization of our preferred
stock, asset
sales, headcount reductions, and other internal initiatives
designed to reduce
our operating costs. If we do not achieve targeted business
model cost levels
and manage costs and processes to achieve additional efficiencies,
our
competitiveness and profitability could decrease.
Our
results of operations are materially affected by economic conditions,
levels of
business activity, and other changes experienced by our
clients
Uncertain
economic conditions continue to affect many of our clients’ businesses and their
budgets for training, consulting, and related products. Such
economic conditions
and budgeted spending are influenced by a wide range of factors
that are beyond
our control and that we have no comparative advantage in forecasting.
These
conditions include:
·
|
The
overall demand for training, consulting, and our
related
products
|
|
·
|
Conditions
and trends in the training and consulting industry
|
|
·
|
General
economic and business conditions
|
|
·
|
General
political developments, such as the war on terrorism,
and their impacts
upon our business both domestically and internationally
|
|
·
|
Natural
or man-made disasters
|
In
addition, our business tends to lag behind economic cycles
and, consequently,
the benefits of any economic recovery may take longer for us
to realize than
other segments of the economy. Future deterioration of economic
conditions,
particularly in the United States, could increase these effects
on our
business.
Our
product sales may continue to decline and result in changes
to our
profitability
In
recent
years, our product sales have declined. These product sales,
which are primarily
delivered through our retail stores, consumer direct channels
(catalog call
center, eCommerce and public seminar programs), wholesale, and
government product channels, have historically been very profitable
for us.
However, due to recent sales declines, we have reevaluated
our product business
and have taken steps to restore its profitability. These initiatives
have
included hiring an additional sales force based at certain
retail stores, retail
store closures, active efforts to transition catalog customers
to our eCommerce
site, outsourcing our government products channel, and increasing
our business
through wholesale channels. However, these initiatives may
also result in
decreased gross margins on our product sales if lower-margin
wholesale sales
increase. If product sales continue to decline or gross margins
decline, our
product sales strategies may not be adequate to return our
product delivery
channels to past profitability levels.
We
may not be able to compensate for lower sales or unexpected
cash outlays with
cost reductions significant enough to generate positive net
income
Although
we have initiated cost-cutting efforts that have included headcount
reductions,
retail store closures, consolidation of administrative office
space, and changes
in our advertising and marketing strategy, if we are not able
to prevent further
sales declines or achieve our growth objectives, we will need
to further reduce
our costs. An unintended consequence of additional cost reductions
may be
reduced sales. If we are not able to effectively reduce our
costs and expenses
commensurate with, or at the same pace as, any further deterioration
in our
sales, we may not be able to generate positive net income or
cash flows from
operations. Although we have experienced improved cash flows
from operations
during fiscal 2006 and 2005 compared to recent periods, an
inability to maintain
or continue to increase cash flows from operations may have
an adverse impact
upon our liquidity and ability to operate the business. For
example, we may not
be able to obtain additional financing or raise additional
capital on terms that
would be acceptable to us.
Our
global operations pose complex management, foreign currency,
legal, tax, and
economic risks, which we may not adequately address
We
have
Company-owned offices in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan,
Mexico, and the
United Kingdom. We also have licensed operations in numerous
other foreign
countries. As a result of these foreign operations and their
growing impact upon
our results of operations, we are subject to a number of risks,
including:
·
|
Restrictions
on the movement of cash
|
|
·
|
Burdens
of complying with a wide variety of national and
local
laws
|
|
·
|
The
absence in some jurisdictions of effective laws to
protect our
intellectual property rights
|
|
·
|
Political
instability
|
|
·
|
Currency
exchange rate fluctuations
|
|
·
|
Longer
payment cycles
|
|
·
|
Price
controls or restrictions on exchange of foreign
currencies
|
While
we
are not currently aware of any of the foregoing conditions
materially adversely
affecting our operations, these conditions, which are outside
of our control,
could change at any time.
We
may experience foreign currency gains and losses
Our
sales
outside of the United States totaled $56.7
million,
or 20
percent
of total sales, in fiscal 2006. As our international operations
continue to grow
and become a larger component of our overall financial results,
our revenues and
operating results may be adversely affected when the dollar
strengthens relative
to other currencies and may be positively affected when the
dollar weakens. In
order to manage a portion of our foreign currency risk, we
make limited use of
foreign currency derivative contracts to hedge certain transactions
and
translation exposure. There can be no guarantee that our foreign
currency risk
management strategy will be effective in reducing the risks
associated with
foreign currency transactions and translation.
Our
profitability will suffer if we are not able to maintain our
pricing and
utilization rates and control our costs
Our
profit margin on training services is largely a function of
the rates we are
able to recover for our services and the utilization, or chargeability,
of our
trainers, client partners, and consultants. Accordingly, if
we are unable to
maintain sufficient pricing for our services or an appropriate
utilization rate
for our training professionals without corresponding cost reductions,
our profit
margin and overall profitability will suffer. The rates that
we are able to
recover for our services are affected by a number of factors,
including:
·
|
Our
clients’ perceptions of our ability to add value through our
programs and
products
|
|
·
|
Competition
|
|
·
|
General
economic conditions
|
|
·
|
Introduction
of new programs or services by us or our competitors
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to accurately estimate, attain, and sustain
engagement sales,
margins, and cash flows over longer contract
periods
|
Our
utilization rates are also affected by a number of factors,
including:
·
|
Seasonal
trends, primarily as a result of scheduled training
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to forecast demand for our products and services
and thereby
maintain an appropriate headcount in our employee
base
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to manage attrition
|
Our
training program profitability is also a function of our ability
to control
costs and improve our efficiency in the delivery of our services.
Our
cost-cutting initiatives, which focus on reducing both fixed
and variable costs,
may not be sufficient to deal with downward pressure on pricing
or utilization
rates. As we introduce new programs and seek to increase the
number of our
training professionals, we may not be able to manage a significantly
larger and
more diverse workforce, control our costs, or improve our
efficiency.
Our
new training programs and products may not be widely accepted
in the
marketplace
In
an
effort to improve our sales performance, we have made significant
investments in
new training and consulting offerings. Additionally, we have
invested in our
existing programs in order to refresh these programs and keep
them relevant in
the marketplace, including certain programs based on the newly
revised
The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People
curriculum. Although we believe that our intellectual property
is highly
regarded in the marketplace, the demand for these new programs
and products is
still emerging. If our clients’ demand for these new programs and products does
not develop as we expect, or if our sales and marketing strategies
for these
programs are not effective, our financial results could be
adversely impacted
and we may need to significantly change our business strategy.
If
we are unable to attract, retain, and motivate high-quality
employees, we will
not be able to compete effectively and will not be able to
grow our
business
Due
to
our reliance on customer satisfaction, our overall success
and ability to grow
are dependent, in part, on our ability to hire, retain, and
motivate sufficient
numbers of talented people with the necessary skills needed
to serve clients and
grow our business. The inability to attract qualified employees
in sufficient
numbers to meet particular demands or the loss of a significant
number of our
employees could have a serious adverse effect on us, including
our ability to
obtain and successfully complete important client engagements
and thus maintain
or increase our sales.
We
continue to offer a variable component of compensation, the
payment of which is
dependent upon our sales performance and profitability. We
adjust our
compensation levels and have adopted different methods of compensation
in order
to attract and retain appropriate numbers of employees with
the necessary skills
to serve our clients and grow our business. We may also use
equity-based
performance incentives as a component of our executives’ compensation, which may
affect amounts of cash compensation. Variations in any of these
areas of
compensation may adversely impact our operating performance.
Our
strategy of outsourcing certain functions and operations may
fail to reduce our
costs for these services
We
have
an outsourcing contract with Electronic Data Systems (EDS)
to provide
warehousing, distribution, information systems, and call center
operations.
Under terms of the outsourcing contract and its addendums,
EDS operates the
Company’s primary call center, provides warehousing and distribution
services,
and supports our various information systems. Due to the nature
of outsourced
operations, we are unable to exercise the same level of control
over outsourced
functions and the actions of EDS employees in outsourced roles
as our own
employees. As a result, the inherent risks associated with
these outsourced
areas of operation may be increased.
Certain
components of the outsourcing agreement contain minimum activity
levels that we
must meet or we will be required to pay penalty charges. If
these activity
levels are not achieved, we may not realize anticipated benefits
from the EDS
outsourcing agreement in these areas.
Our
outsourcing contracts with EDS contain early termination provisions
that we may
exercise under certain conditions. However, in order to exercise
the early
termination provisions, we would have to pay specified penalties
to EDS
depending upon the circumstances of the contract termination.
We
have significant intangible asset balances that may be impaired
if cash flows
from related activities decline
At
August
31, 2006 we had $79.5
million
of intangible assets, which were primarily generated from the
fiscal 1997 merger
with the Covey Leadership Center. These intangible assets are
evaluated for
impairment based upon cash flows (definite-lived intangible
assets) and
estimated royalties from revenue streams (indefinite-lived
intangible assets).
Although our current sales and cash flows are sufficient to
support the carrying
basis of these intangibles, if our sales and corresponding
cash flows decline,
we may be faced with significant asset impairment charges.
Our
future quarterly operating results are subject to factors that
can cause
fluctuations in our stock price
Historically,
our stock price has experienced significant volatility. We
expect that our stock
price may continue to experience volatility in the future due
to a variety of
potential factors that may include the following:
·
|
Fluctuations
in our quarterly results of operations and cash flows
|
|
·
|
Variations
between our actual financial results and market
expectations
|
|
·
|
Changes
in our key balances, such as cash and cash equivalents
|
|
·
|
Currency
exchange rate fluctuations
|
|
·
|
Unexpected
asset impairment charges
|
|
·
|
Lack
of analyst coverage
|
In
addition, the stock market has experienced substantial price
and volume
fluctuations over the past several years that has had some
impact upon our stock
and other stock issues in the market. These factors, as well
as general investor
concerns regarding the credibility of corporate financial statements
and the
accounting profession, may have a material adverse effect upon
our stock in the
future.
We
may need additional capital in the future, and this capital
may not be available
to us on favorable terms
We
may
need to raise additional funds through public or private debt
offerings or
equity financings in order to:
·
|
Develop
new services, programs, or products
|
|
·
|
Take
advantage of opportunities, including expansion of
the
business
|
|
·
|
Respond
to competitive pressures
|
We
may be
unable to obtain the necessary capital on terms or conditions
that are favorable
to us.
We
are the creditor for a management common stock loan program
that may not be
fully collectible
We
are
the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to
allow certain
management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of
our common stock. For
further information regarding our management common stock loan
program, refer to
Note 9
to our
consolidated financial statements as found in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The inability of the Company to collect all, or
a portion, of these
receivables could have an adverse impact upon our financial
position and future
cash flows compared to full collection of the loans.
We
may have exposure to additional tax liabilities
As
a
multinational company, we are subject to income taxes as well
as non-income
based taxes, in both the United States and various foreign
tax jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide
provision for
income taxes and other tax liabilities. In the normal course
of a global
business, there are many intercompany transactions and calculations
where the
ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As a result, we are
regularly under
audit by tax authorities. Although we believe that our tax
estimates are
reasonable, we cannot assure you that the final determination
of tax audits will
not be different from what is reflected in our historical income
tax provisions
and accruals.
We
are
also subject to non-income taxes, such as payroll, sales, use,
value-added, and
property taxes in both the United States and various foreign
jurisdictions. We
are regularly under audit by tax authorities with respect to
these non-income
taxes and may have exposure to additional non-income tax
liabilities.
We
may elect to use our cash to redeem shares of preferred stock
or purchase shares
of our common stock, which may decrease our ability to respond
to adverse
changes
Our
outstanding preferred stock bears a cumulative dividend equal
to 10 percent per
annum. Through August 31, 2006 we have redeemed $50.0 million
of our outstanding
preferred stock and during fiscal 2006 we amended the terms
of our preferred
stock recapitalization that was completed in fiscal 2005 to
extend the period
during which we can redeem preferred stock at an amount equal
to the liquidation
preference. We anticipate that we may redeem additional shares
of preferred
stock in the future to the extent that we believe sufficient
cash is available
to do so. Any such preferred stock redemptions will reduce
our cash on hand and
may reduce our ability to adequately respond to any future
adverse changes in
our business and operations, whether anticipated or unanticipated.
A
natural or man-made disaster could have a material adverse
effect on the
Company’s business
We
have
products and training materials manufactured at numerous sites
located around
the world. However, a significant portion of our products are
manufactured and
shipped from facilities located in Salt Lake City, Utah. In
the event that these
facilities were severely damaged or destroyed as a result of
a natural or
man-made disaster, we would be forced to rely solely on third-party
manufacturers. Such an event could have a material adverse
impact on our
business prospects, results of operations, and financial condition.
ITEM
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Pursuant
to a review of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2005, we received a comment letter from the Securities and
Exchange Commission
(SEC) Staff related to various issues. During fiscal 2006 we
resolved all of the
comments on this letter except for a matter regarding the treatment
of
management common stock loan shares in the calculation of earnings
per share
(EPS) following the fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2006 modifications
to the loans. We
have sent a response to the SEC Staff and have had ongoing
discussions regarding
this matter. The Company believes that it has properly accounted
for the EPS
effects of changes to the management stock loan program but
the matter is
subject to further review and comment by the SEC. For further
information
regarding the treatment of management stock loan shares in
the calculation of
EPS, refer to Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements
in Item 8 of this
report on Form 10-K.
ITEM
2.
|
Properties
|
FranklinCovey’s
principal business operations and executive offices are located
in Salt Lake
City, Utah. The following is a summary of our owned and leased
properties. Our
corporate headquarters lease is accounted for as a financing
arrangement and all
other facility lease agreements are accounted for as operating
leases. Our lease
agreements expire at various dates through the year 2025.
Corporate
Facilities
Corporate
Headquarters and Administrative Offices:
Salt
Lake
City, Utah (7 buildings) - all leased
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit
Regional
Sales Offices:
United
States (7 locations) - all leased
International
Administrative/Sales Offices:
Canada
(1
location) - owned
Latin/South
America (3 locations) - all leased
Asia
Pacific (4 locations) - all leased
Europe
(1
location) - leased
International
Distribution Facilities:
Canada
(1
location) - owned
Latin
America (1 location) - leased
Asia
Pacific (3 locations) - all leased
Europe
(1
location) - leased
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit
Retail
Stores:
United
States (89 locations in 33 states) - all leased
Manufacturing
Facilities:
Salt
Lake
City, Utah (1 location) - for sale
A
significant portion of our corporate headquarters campus
is subleased to several
unrelated entities.
We
consider our existing facilities to be in good condition
and suitable for our
current and anticipated level of operations in the upcoming
fiscal year.
Significant developments related to our properties during
fiscal 2006 consisted
of the following:
·
|
In
August 2006, we initiated a plan to reconfigure
our printing operations in
order to lower manufacturing costs, increase operational
efficiency, and
improve our ability to provide printing services
for other entities. As a
result of this plan, we are moving our printing
operation a short distance
from its existing location to our corporate headquarters
campus and we are
in the process of selling the existing manufacturing
facility. We are also
selling certain printing presses at the existing
location and plan to
replace these presses with new presses at the new
location. Other existing
presses will be moved to the new location as part
of the reconfiguration
plan. Because of the disruption of printing activity
resulting from the
move, the Company has developed a supply strategy
to maintain adequate
inventories of printed material while the reconfiguration
plan is
completed.
|
|
·
|
During
fiscal 2006, we closed 16 domestic retail store
locations and may close
additional retail locations during fiscal
2007.
|
ITEM
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
During
fiscal 2002, we received a subpoena from the Securities and
Exchange Commission
(SEC) seeking documents and information relating to our management
stock loan
program and previously announced, and withdrawn, tender offer.
We provided the
documents and information requested by the SEC, including
the testimonies of our
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other
key employees.
During February 2006, we received notification from the SEC
that the
investigation was terminated without a recommendation for
enforcement
action.
In
fiscal
2002, we filed legal action against World Marketing Alliance,
Inc., a Georgia
corporation (WMA), and World Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and
purchaser of substantially all assets of WMA, for breach
of contract. The case
proceeded to trial and the jury rendered a verdict in our
favor and against WMA
on November 1, 2004 for the entire unpaid contract amount
of approximately $1.1
million. In addition to the verdict, we recovered legal fees
totaling $0.3
million and pre- and post-judgment interest of $0.3 million
from WMA. During our
fiscal quarter ended May 28, 2005, we received payment in
cash from WMA for the
total verdict amount, including legal fees and interest.
However, shortly after
paying the verdict amount, WMA appealed the jury decision
to the 10th Circuit
Court of Appeals and we recorded receipt of the verdict amount
plus legal fees
and interest with a corresponding increase to accrued liabilities
and deferred
the gain until the case was finally resolved. On December
30, 2005, the Company
entered into a settlement agreement with WMA. Under the terms
of the settlement
agreement, WMA agreed to dismiss its appeal. As a result
of this settlement
agreement and dismissal of WMA’s appeal, we recorded a $0.9 million gain from
the legal settlement in the quarter ended February 25, 2006.
We also recorded a
$0.3 million reduction in selling, general and, administrative
expenses for
recovered legal expenses.
In
August
2005, EpicRealm Licensing (EpicRealm) filed an action against
the Company for
patent infringement. The action alleges that FranklinCovey
infringed upon two of
EpicRealm’s patents directed to managing dynamic web page requests
from clients
to a web server that in turn uses a page server to generate
a dynamic web page
from content retrieved from a data source. The Company denies
the patent
infringement and believes that the EpicRealm claims are invalid.
This litigation
is currently in the discovery phase and the Company intends
to vigorously defend
this matter.
The
Company is also the subject of certain other legal actions,
which we consider
routine to our business activities. At August 31, 2006, we
believe that, after
consultation with legal counsel, any potential liability
to the Company under
such actions will not materially affect our financial position,
liquidity, or
results of operations.
ITEM
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
No
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter
of our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.
PART
II
ITEM
5.
|
Market
for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and
Issuer
Purchases of Equity
Securities
|
FranklinCovey’s
common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under
the symbol “FC.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
the
high and low sale prices for our common stock, as reported
on the NYSE Composite
Tape, for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005.
High
|
Low
|
||||||
Fiscal
Year Ended August 31, 2006:
|
|||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
8.37
|
$
|
5.16
|
|||
Third
Quarter
|
9.79
|
7.00
|
|||||
Second
Quarter
|
7.79
|
6.00
|
|||||
First
Quarter
|
7.35
|
6.42
|
|||||
Fiscal
Year Ended August 31, 2005:
|
|||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
8.10
|
$
|
5.80
|
|||
Third
Quarter
|
7.13
|
2.22
|
|||||
Second
Quarter
|
2.80
|
1.65
|
|||||
First
Quarter
|
1.98
|
1.61
|
We
did
not pay or declare dividends on our common stock during the
fiscal years ended
August 31, 2006 and 2005. We currently anticipate that we
will retain all
available funds to redeem outstanding preferred stock, purchase
shares of our
common stock, and to finance our future growth and business
opportunities and we
do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable
future. However, we are obligated to pay cash dividends,
which accrue at 10
percent per year, on our outstanding shares of Series A preferred
stock.
As
of
November 1, 2006, the Company had 19,678,591 shares of its
common stock
outstanding, which was held by 424 shareholders of record.
The
following table summarizes Company purchases of our preferred
and common stock
during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2006:
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Maximum
Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||
Common
Shares:
|
|||||||||||||
May
28, 2006 to July 1, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
none
|
$ |
6,073
|
|||||||
July
2, 2006 to July 29, 2006
|
50,700
|
6.65
|
50,700
|
5,735
|
|||||||||
July
30, 2006 to August 31, 2006
|
145,100
|
5.85
|
145,100
|
4,887
|
(1) | ||||||||
Total
Common Shares
|
195,800
|
$
|
6.06
|
195,800
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total
Preferred Shares
|
none
|
none
|
____________________________
(1) In
January 2006, our Board of Directors approved the purchase
of up to $10.0
million of our outstanding common stock. All previous authorized
common stock
purchase plans were canceled. Following the approval of this
stock purchase
plan, we purchased a total of 681,300 shares of common stock
for $5.1 million
during fiscal 2006.
ITEM
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The
selected consolidated financial data presented below should
be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of
Franklin Covey and the
related footnotes as found in Item 8 of this report on Form
10-K.
During
fiscal 2002, we sold the operations of Premier Agendas and
discontinued our
on-line planning service offered at franklinplanner.com.
Accordingly, the
information set forth in the table below has been restated
to reflect Premier
Agendas and franklinplanner.com as discontinued operations.
August
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
|||||||||||
In
thousands, except per share data
|
||||||||||||||||
Income
Statement Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
278,623
|
$
|
283,542
|
$
|
275,434
|
$
|
307,160
|
$
|
332,998
|
||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
14,046
|
8,443
|
(9,064
|
)
|
(47,665
|
)
|
(122,573
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations before
income
taxes
|
13,631
|
9,101
|
(8,801
|
)
|
(47,790
|
)
|
(122,179
|
)
|
||||||||
Income
tax benefit (provision)(1)
|
14,942
|
1,085
|
(1,349
|
)
|
2,537
|
32,122
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations(1)
|
28,573
|
10,186
|
(10,150
|
)
|
(45,253
|
)
|
(90,057
|
)
|
||||||||
Cumulative
effect of accounting change, net of income taxes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(75,928
|
)
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders(1)
|
24,188
|
(5,837
|
)
|
(18,885
|
)
|
(53,988
|
)
|
(117,399
|
)
|
|||||||
Earnings
(loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
$
|
(2.69
|
)
|
$
|
(5.90
|
)
|
||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.18
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
$
|
(2.69
|
)
|
$
|
(5.90
|
)
|
||
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
current assets
|
$
|
87,120
|
$
|
105,182
|
$
|
92,229
|
$
|
110,057
|
$
|
124,345
|
||||||
Other
long-term assets
|
12,249
|
9,051
|
7,305
|
10,472
|
11,474
|
|||||||||||
Total
assets
|
216,559
|
233,233
|
227,625
|
262,146
|
308,344
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
obligations of continuing operations
|
35,347
|
46,171
|
13,067
|
15,743
|
15,231
|
|||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
83,210
|
100,407
|
69,146
|
84,479
|
81,922
|
|||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
37,345
|
57,345
|
87,203
|
87,203
|
87,203
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
133,349
|
132,826
|
158,479
|
177,667
|
226,422
|
__________________________
(1)
|
Net
income in fiscal 2006 includes the impact of deferred
tax asset valuation
allowance reversals totaling $20.4
million.
|
ITEM
7.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations
|
INTRODUCTION
The
following management’s discussion and analysis is intended to provide a summary
of the principal factors affecting the results of operations, liquidity
and
capital resources, contractual obligations, and the critical accounting
policies
of Franklin Covey Co. (also referred to as the Company, we, us, our,
and
FranklinCovey, unless otherwise indicated) and subsidiaries. This discussion
and
analysis should be read together with our consolidated financial statements
and
related notes, which contain additional information regarding the accounting
policies and estimates underlying the Company’s financial statements. Our
consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented in
Item 8 of
this report on Form 10-K.
FranklinCovey
seeks to improve the effectiveness of organizations and individuals
and is a
worldwide leader in providing integrated learning and performance solutions
to
organizations and individuals that are designed to enhance strategic
execution,
productivity, leadership, sales force performance, effective communications,
and
other skills. Each performance solution may include products and services
that
encompass training and consulting, assessment, and various application
tools
that are generally available in electronic or paper-based formats.
Our products
and services are available through professional consulting services,
public
workshops, retail stores, catalogs, and the Internet at www.franklincovey.com.
Historically, our best-known offerings include the FranklinCovey Planner™, and a
suite of individual-effectiveness and leadership-development training
products
based on the best-selling book The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People.
We also
offer a range of training and assessment products to help organizations
achieve
superior results by focusing and executing on top priorities, building
the
capability of knowledge workers, and aligning business processes. These
offerings include the popular workshop FOCUS:
Achieving Your Highest Priorities™,
The
4
Disciplines of Execution™,
The
4
Roles of Leadership™,
Building
Business Acumen: What the CEO Wants You to Know™,
the
Advantage Series communication workshops, and the Execution
Quotient
(xQ™)
organizational assessment tool.
Our
fiscal year ends on August 31, and unless otherwise indicated, fiscal
2006,
fiscal 2005, and fiscal 2004, refers to the twelve-month periods ended
August
31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Key
factors that influence our operating results include the number of
organizations
that are active customers; the number of people trained within those
organizations; the sale of personal productivity tools (including FranklinCovey
Planners, personal, binders, electronic planning devices, and other
related
products); the availability of budgeted training spending at our clients
and
prospective clients, which is significantly influenced by general economic
conditions; and our ability to manage operating costs necessary to
develop and
provide meaningful training and products to our clients.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Our
operating results in fiscal 2006 reflected year-over-year improvement
compared
to fiscal 2005. Despite a slight decrease in overall sales, due primarily
to
closed retail stores, we reported income from operations of $14.0
million
in fiscal 2006 compared to $8.4
million
in fiscal 2005. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, we reported
net
income (before preferred dividends) of $28.6
million,
compared to $10.2
million
in fiscal 2005. Our fiscal 2006 net income includes the reversal of
valuation
allowances on our deferred income tax assets that favorably impacted
our
reported income taxes by $20.4
million.
The primary factors that influenced our financial results for the fiscal
year
ended August 31, 2006 were as follows:
·
|
Sales
Performance
- Our
consolidated sales decreased $4.9
million compared to the prior year. The decrease in sales
was due to an
$11.0
million decline in product sales that was primarily the result
of closed
retail stores. Our training and consulting services sales
increased by
$6.1
million compared to fiscal 2005, which was attributable to
improvements in
both domestic and international delivery channels. The improvement
in
training and consulting services sales was primarily due
to increased
sales of our recently refreshed The
7 Habits of Highly Effective People training
courses.
|
|
·
|
Decreased
Operating Costs
-
Our operating costs decreased by $6.9
million compared to fiscal 2005. Reduced operating expenses
were due to a
$3.6
million reduction in selling, general, and administrative
expenses, a
$3.0
million decrease in depreciation expense, and a $0.3
million decline in amortization expense. Consistent with
prior years, we
continue to seek for and implement strategies that will enable
us to
reduce our operating costs in order to improve our
profitability.
|
|
·
|
Income
Tax Benefit - Due
to improved operating performance and the expected availability
of future
taxable amounts, we concluded that it was more likely than
not that the
benefits of certain deferred income tax assets would be realized.
As a
result, we reversed the valuation allowances on those domestic
net
deferred income tax assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2006. The
reversal of the valuation allowances had a $20.4
million favorable impact on our reported fiscal 2006 income
taxes.
|
|
·
|
Preferred
Stock Redemptions
-
During fiscal 2006, we redeemed $20.0
million, or 0.8
million shares, of our Series A preferred stock. Since the
fiscal 2005
preferred stock recapitalization, we have redeemed a total
of $50.0
million, or 2.0
million shares, of our preferred stock. These preferred stock
redemptions
have reduced our dividend obligation by $5.0
million per year.
|
Although
we achieved improved financial results in fiscal 2006 and recognized
improvements in other financial trends, we have not yet attained our
targeted
business model and we are therefore continuing our efforts to increase
sales,
improve gross margins, and reduce operating costs in order to achieve
consistently profitable operations in future periods. Further details
regarding
our operating results and liquidity are provided throughout the following
management’s discussion and analysis.
The
following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, the percentage
of
total sales represented by the line items through income (loss) before
income
taxes in our consolidated income statements:
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Product
sales
|
56.1
|
%
|
59.0
|
%
|
64.3
|
%
|
||||
Training
and consulting services sales
|
43.9
|
41.0
|
35.7
|
|||||||
Total
sales
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|||||||
Product
cost of sales
|
25.3
|
27.2
|
31.1
|
|||||||
Training
and consulting services cost of sales
|
14.6
|
13.3
|
12.3
|
|||||||
Total
cost of sales
|
39.9
|
40.5
|
43.4
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
60.1
|
59.5
|
56.6
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
52.0
|
52.3
|
54.1
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
1.7
|
2.7
|
4.3
|
|||||||
Amortization
|
1.4
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
|||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
55.1
|
56.5
|
59.9
|
|||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
5.0
|
3.0
|
(3.3
|
)
|
||||||
Interest
income
|
0.5
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(0.9
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
||||||
Recovery
from legal settlement
|
0.3
|
|||||||||
Gain
on disposal of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
0.2
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
4.9
|
%
|
3.2
|
%
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
Segment
Review
We
have
two reporting segments: the Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU)
and the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit (OSBU). The following is a brief
description of these segments and their primary operating
activities.
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit
- This
business unit is primarily focused on sales to individual customers
and includes
the results of the Company’s retail stores, consumer direct (includes catalog,
eCommerce, and public seminar training) operations, wholesale, and
other related
distribution channels, including government sales, and office superstores.
The
CSBU results of operations also include the financial results of our
paper
planner manufacturing operations. Although CSBU sales primarily consist
of
products such as planners, binders, software, and handheld electronic
planning
devices, virtually any component of the Company’s leadership and productivity
solutions can be purchased through CSBU channels.
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit
- The
OSBU
is primarily responsible for the development, marketing, sale, and
delivery of
productivity, leadership, strategic execution, goal alignment, sales
performance, and effective communication training solutions directly
to
organizational clients, including other companies, the government,
and
educational institutions. The OSBU includes the financial results of
our
domestic sales force as well as our international operations. Our international
operations include the financial results of our directly-owned foreign
offices
and royalty revenues from licensees.
The
following table sets forth sales data by category and for our operating
segments
for the periods indicated. For further information regarding our reporting
segments and geographic information, refer to Note 18
to our
consolidated financial statements as found in Item 8 of this report
on Form 10-K
(in thousands).
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
Percent
change from prior year
|
2005
|
Percent
change from prior year
|
2004
|
|||||||||||
Sales
by Category:
|
||||||||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
156,205
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
167,179
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
177,184
|
||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
122,418
|
5
|
116,363
|
18
|
98,250
|
|||||||||||
$
|
278,623
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
283,542
|
3
|
$
|
275,434
|
||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
stores
|
$
|
62,440
|
(16)
|
|
$
|
74,331
|
(16)
|
|
$
|
87,922
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
63,681
|
1
|
62,873
|
5
|
60,091
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
19,783
|
-
|
19,691
|
(7)
|
|
21,081
|
||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
4,910
|
31
|
3,757
|
87
|
2,007
|
|||||||||||
150,814
|
(6)
|
|
160,652
|
(6)
|
|
171,101
|
||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
71,108
|
3
|
68,816
|
23
|
56,015
|
|||||||||||
International
|
56,701
|
5
|
54,074
|
12
|
48,318
|
|||||||||||
127,809
|
4
|
122,890
|
18
|
104,333
|
||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
$
|
278,623
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
283,542
|
3
|
$
|
275,434
|
FISCAL
2006 COMPARED TO FISCAL 2005
Sales
Product
Sales - Our
overall product sales, which primarily consist of planners, binders,
software,
handheld electronic planning devices, and publishing, which are primarily
sold
through our CSBU channels, declined $11.0
million
compared to fiscal 2005. The decline in overall product sales was primarily
due
to decreased retail
store sales resulting from store closures that occurred during fiscal
2006 and
2005. The following is a description of sales performance in our CSBU
delivery
channels during the year ended August 31, 2006:
·
|
Retail
Sales
-
The decline in retail sales was primarily due to store
closures, which had
a $12.5
million unfavorable impact on our retail store sales in
fiscal 2006. Our
retail stores also sold $1.7
million less technology and specialty products when compared
to the prior
year, primarily due to declining demand for electronic
handheld planning
products. Although store closures and reduced technology
and specialty
product sales caused total retail sales to decline compared
to the prior
year, we recognized a 1
percent improvement in year-over-year comparable store
(stores which were
open during the comparable periods) sales in fiscal 2006
as sales of
“core” products (e.g. planners, binders, totes, and accessories)
increased
compared to the prior year. At August 31, 2006, we were
operating
89
domestic retail locations compared to 105
locations at August 31, 2005.
|
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct
-
Sales through our consumer direct segment (eCommerce, catalog,
and public
seminars) increased primarily due to increased public seminar sales
and increased sales of core products. Increased public
seminar sales was
the result of additional seminars held during fiscal 2006
and an increase
in the number of participants attending these programs.
|
|
·
|
Wholesale
Sales
- Sales
through our wholesale channel, which includes sales to
office superstores
and other retail chains, were essentially flat compared
to the prior
year.
|
|
·
|
Other
CSBU Sales
-
Other CSBU sales primarily consist of domestic printing
and publishing
sales and building sublease revenues. The increase in other
CSBU sales was
primarily attributable to increased sublease income from
additional
sublease contracts obtained during fiscal 2006. We have
subleased a
substantial portion of our corporate headquarters in Salt
Lake City, Utah
and have recognized $1.9
million of sublease revenue during fiscal 2006, compared
to $1.1
million in fiscal 2005.
|
Training
and Consulting Services Sales - We
offer
a variety of training and consulting services and related products
that are
focused on assisting individuals and organizations to become measurably
more
effective. Our training and consulting services include programs in
productivity, leadership, strategy execution, sales force performance,
and
effective communications that are delivered both domestically and
internationally through the OSBU. Our overall training and consulting
service
sales totaled $122.4
million
in fiscal 2006, an increase of $6.1
million
compared to the prior year. The improvement in training sales was reflected
in
both domestic and international training program and consulting sales.
Our
domestic sales performance improved in nearly all sales regions and
was
primarily attributable to increased sales of the refreshed The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People
training
course and the expansion of our sales force. Domestic sales also increased
$0.7
million
as a result of additional Symposium conferences that were held during
the third
and fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. These sales increases were partially
offset
by reduced sales force performance training, due to decreased demand
in fiscal
2006, and decreased sales from seminars presented by Dr. Stephen R.
Covey. In
fiscal 2005, Dr. Covey presented more seminars to coincide with the
publication
of his new book, The
8th
Habit.
International
sales improved by $2.6
million,
primarily due to increased sales at our directly owned operations in
Japan,
Canada, and Brazil, as well as increased licensee royalty revenues.
International sales improvements from these sources were partially
offset by
decreased sales in the United Kingdom and Mexico, unfavorable currency
translation rates, and the correction of misstatements at our Mexico
subsidiary.
During fiscal 2006, certain foreign currencies, particularly the Japanese
Yen,
weakened against the United States dollar, which had an unfavorable
impact on
reported sales. The unfavorable impact of currency translation on reported
international sales totaled $1.0
million
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. During the third quarter
of fiscal
2006, we determined that our Mexico subsidiary misstated its financial
results
in prior periods by recording improper sales transactions and not recording
all
operating expenses in proper periods. We determined that the misstatements
occurred during fiscal 2002 through fiscal 2006 in various amounts.
The
correction of these misstatements, which primarily occurred in prior
fiscal
years, resulted in a $0.5
million
decrease in international sales in fiscal 2006.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit consists of net sales less the cost of goods sold or the cost
of services
provided. Our cost of sales includes materials used in the production
of
planners and related products, assembly and manufacturing labor costs,
direct
costs of conducting seminars, freight, and certain other overhead costs.
Gross
profit may be affected by, among other things, prices of materials,
labor rates,
product sales mix, changes in product discount levels, production efficiency,
and freight costs.
We
record
the costs associated with operating our retail stores, call center,
and Internet
site as part of our consolidated selling, general, and administrative
expenses.
Therefore, our consolidated gross profit may not be comparable with
the gross
profit of other retailers that include similar costs in their cost
of
sales.
Our
overall gross margin, which is gross profit stated in terms of a percentage
of
sales, improved to 60.1
percent
in fiscal 2006, compared to 59.5
percent
in the prior year. The gross margin improvement was primarily attributable
to
improved margins on product sales, which was partially offset by declining
margins on our training and consulting sales. Our gross margin on product
sales
improved to 54.9
percent
compared to 53.9
percent
in fiscal 2005. The improvement in product sales gross margin was primarily
due
to improved inventory management processes, which reduced obsolescence,
scrap,
and other related charges, and changes in our product mix as sales
of lower
margin technology and specialty products continued to decline while
sales of
higher margin core products increased compared to the prior year.
Our
overall gross margin on training and consulting services declined to
66.7
percent
of sales compared to 67.5
percent
in the prior year. The decrease in training and consulting services
gross margin
was primarily attributable to increased sales of lower-margin Symposium
conferences and decreased sales of higher-margin sales performance
training
products during fiscal 2006. These unfavorable gross margin items were
partially
offset by decreased sales of lower-margin seminars presented by Dr.
Covey in the
fiscal year.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General and Administrative
- Our
consolidated selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased
$3.6
million
compared to the prior year. The decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due
to reduced retail store costs resulting from operating fewer stores,
reductions
in executive severance costs, reduced stock-based compensation costs,
and the
favorable results of initiatives to reduce overall operating costs.
Our retail
store SG&A expenses decreased $5.1
million
primarily due to store closures that occurred during fiscal 2006 and
in prior
periods (refer to discussion below). During fiscal 2005 we incurred
and expensed
$0.9
million
of severance costs to our former general counsel and we did not incur
any
similar executive severance charges in fiscal 2006. Our stock-based
compensation
costs declined $0.4
million
due to a fully vested stock award granted to the CEO and accelerated
vesting on
unvested stock awards during fiscal 2005. The overall decrease in stock-based
compensation cost was partially offset by expense related to our long-term
incentive plan (see discussion below) during fiscal 2006. In addition
to these
decreases, we continue to implement strategies designed to reduce our
overall
operating costs. The favorable impact of these efforts has resulted
in reduced
SG&A expenses in many areas of the Company during the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2006. These cost reductions were partially offset by additional
spending on growth initiatives (see discussion below) that resulted
in increased
travel expenses resulting from further employee training and sales
leadership
events, which totaled $1.3
million,
and increased OSBU associate costs totaling $1.1
million
resulting primarily from hiring additional sales personnel. We also
corrected
misstated operating expenses at our Mexico subsidiary, which had a
$0.5
million
unfavorable impact on our SG&A expenses in fiscal 2006.
During
fiscal 2006, we have invested in various initiatives intended to grow
our
business in future periods. These initiatives included hiring additional
sales
people, increased advertising and marketing programs, additional curriculum
and
product development, and increased spending on sales effectiveness
training. Due
to the time necessary to implement these growth strategies, including
training
new sales personnel and effectively rolling
out new training offerings and products, these growth initiatives did
not add
material benefits to our fiscal 2006 operating results. However, we
believe that
these investments in additional sales personnel, increased marketing,
and new
consulting, training, and product offerings may increase our sales
and improve
our operating performance in future periods.
We
regularly assess the operating performance of our retail stores, including
previous operating performance trends and projected future profitability.
During
this assessment process, judgments are made as to whether under-performing
or
unprofitable stores should be closed. As a result of this evaluation
process, we
closed 16
stores
during fiscal 2006. The costs associated with closing retail stores
are
typically comprised of charges related to vacating the premises, which
may
include a provision for the remaining term on the lease, and severance
and other
personnel costs. These store closure costs totaled $0.5
million
in fiscal 2006 compared to $1.0
million
in fiscal 2005, when we closed 30 retail locations. Store closure costs
are
expensed as incurred and were included as a component of our SG&A expense.
Based upon our continuing analyses of retail store performance, we
may close
additional retail stores and may continue to incur costs associated
with closing
these stores in future periods.
During
fiscal 2006 our shareholders approved a long-term incentive plan (LTIP)
that
permits the grant of annual unvested share awards of common stock to
certain
employees. These LTIP share awards granted during fiscal 2006 cliff
vest on
August 31, 2008, which is the completion of a three-year performance
period. The
number of shares that are finally awarded to participants is variable
and is
based entirely upon the achievement of a combination of performance
objectives
related to sales growth and operating income during the three-year
performance
period. The award was initially for 377,665
shares
(target award) of common stock. The award shares were valued at $6.60
per
share, and the corresponding initial compensation cost totaled $2.5
million.
However, the number of shares that will ultimately vest under the LTIP
will vary
depending on whether the performance criteria are met or exceeded.
The award
will be reviewed quarterly and the value may be adjusted, depending
on the
performance of the Company compared to the award criteria. Based upon
fiscal
2006 financial performance and estimated performance through the remaining
service period, the number of performance awards granted during fiscal
2006 was
reduced during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 to 337,588 shares, which
resulted in a cumulative adjustment to our fiscal 2006 operating results
of $0.1
million. The compensation cost of the award is being expensed over the
three-year service period of the award and increased our stock-based
compensation cost in fiscal 2006 by $0.5 million. The continued amortization
of
the fiscal 2006 award and any future LTIP grants may increase our SG&A
expense during the vesting period.
On
September 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised
2004),
Share-Based
Payment (SFAS
No.
123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation.
Statement No. 123R requires all share based-payments to employees,
including
grants of stock options and the compensatory elements of employee stock
purchase
plans, to be recognized in the income statement based upon their fair
values.
Although the additional compensation expense resulting from the adoption
of SFAS
No. 123R was immaterial to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, our
operating
expenses may be unfavorably affected in future periods if we grant
additional
stock options or participation in our employee stock purchase program
increases.
Depreciation
and Amortization
- Depreciation
expense decreased $3.0
million,
or 39
percent,
compared to fiscal 2005 primarily due to the full depreciation or disposal
of
certain property and equipment and the effects of significantly reduced
capital
expenditures during preceding fiscal years. Based upon current capital
spending
levels, we do not expect depreciation expense to continue to decline
during
fiscal 2007 to the same extent that it declined in fiscal 2006 when
compared to
prior periods.
Amortization
expense on definite-lived intangible assets totaled $3.8
million
for fiscal 2006 compared to $4.2
million
in the prior year. The decline was due to the full amortization of
certain
intangible assets during fiscal 2006 and in prior periods. During fiscal
2006,
we reduced the remaining estimated useful life of customer lists acquired
in the
merger with the Covey Leadership Center based upon expected future
sales from
these customers. This change in accounting estimate increased our amortization
expense in fiscal 2006 by $0.6
million.
We expect intangible asset amortization expense to total $3.6
million
in fiscal 2007.
Other
Income and Expense Items
Interest
Income
-
Our
interest income increased $0.4
million
primarily due to increased interest rates on our interest-bearing cash
accounts.
Interest
Expense
-
Our
interest expense increased $1.8
million
primarily due to the sale of our corporate headquarters facility and
the
resulting interest component of the financing obligation in our lease
payments
to the landlord.
Legal
Settlement
- In
fiscal
2002, we filed legal action against World Marketing Alliance, Inc.,
a Georgia
corporation (WMA), and World Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and
purchaser of substantially all assets of WMA, for breach of contract.
The case
proceeded to trial and the jury rendered a verdict in our favor and
against WMA
for the entire unpaid contract amount of approximately $1.1
million.
In addition to the verdict, we recovered legal fees totaling $0.3
million
and pre- and post-judgment interest of $0.3
million
from WMA. We received payment in cash from WMA for the total verdict
amount,
including legal fees and interest. However, shortly after paying the
verdict
amount, WMA appealed the jury decision to the 10th Circuit Court of
Appeals and
we recorded receipt of the verdict amount plus legal fees and interest
with a
corresponding increase to accrued liabilities and deferred the gain
until the
case was finally resolved. On December 30, 2005, we entered into a
settlement
agreement with WMA. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, WMA
agreed to
dismiss its appeal. As a result of this settlement agreement and dismissal
of
WMA’s appeal, we recorded a $0.9
million
gain from the legal settlement.
Income
Taxes
The
increase in our income tax benefit in fiscal 2006 was due to the reversal
of the
majority of our valuation allowances on our deferred income tax assets,
which
totaled $20.4 million. The fiscal 2006 income tax benefit was partially
offset
by taxes withheld on royalties from foreign licensees and taxes paid
in foreign
jurisdictions by our profitable directly owned foreign operations.
The income
tax benefit in fiscal 2005 was primarily due to the reversal of accruals
related
to the resolution of certain tax matters and was partially offset by
taxes
withheld on royalties from foreign licensees and taxes paid in foreign
jurisdictions resulting from profitable foreign operations.
Our
effective tax rate has been unusual in recent years, including fiscal
2006, due
to the effect of operating losses and changes in valuation allowances.
Absent
extraordinary, unforeseen events, we expect our effective income tax
rate for
fiscal 2007 and future years to be approximately 55 percent, primarily
due to
the effect of permanent book versus tax differences and income from
foreign
licensees. However, the utilization of domestic loss carryforwards
will minimize
cash outflows related to domestic income taxes.
FISCAL
2005 COMPARED TO FISCAL 2004
Sales
Product
Sales - Our
overall product sales, which are primarily sold through our CSBU channels,
declined $10.0
million
compared to fiscal 2004. The decline in product sales was primarily
due to
decreased sales in our retail and wholesale delivery channels, with
the majority
of the decline in product sales occurring in our first quarter of fiscal
2005.
The following is a description of sales performance in our CSBU delivery
channels during the fiscal 2005:
· |
Retail
Sales - The decline in retail sales was due to the impact
of
fewer stores, which represented $10.7 million of the total
$13.6 million
decline, and reduced technology and spacialty product sales,
which totaled
$5.5 million. During fiscal 2004, we closed 18 retail store
locations and we closed 30 additional stores during fiscal
2005. At
August 31, 2005, we were operating 105 retail stores compared
to 135
stores at August 31, 2004. Overall product sales trends were
reflected in a four percent decline in year-over-year comparable
store
sales. Declining technology and specialty product sales were
partially offset by increased "core" product sales during fiscal
2005.
|
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct
-
Sales through our consumer direct channels (eCommerce,
catalog, and public
seminars) increased primarily due to increased public seminar
sales, which
totaled $2.3
million, and increased core product sales.
|
|
·
|
Wholesale
Sales
- Sales
through our wholesale channel, which includes sales to
office superstores
and other retail chains, decreased primarily due to a shift
from contract
stationer revenue channels to royalty based retail channels.
As a result
of this change our sales decreased, but our gross margin
contribution
through this channel remained consistent with the prior
year.
|
|
· | Other CSBU Sales - Other CSBU sales primarily consist of domestic printing and publishing sales and building sublease revenues. The increase in other CSBU sales was primarily attributable to increased sublease income. We have subleased a substantial portion of our corporate headquarters in Salt Lake City, Utah and have recognized $1.1 million of sublease revenue during fiscal 2005, compared to $0.2 million in fiscal 2004. |
Training
and Consulting Services Sales -
Our
overall training and consulting service sales increased by $18.1
million,
or 18
percent,
compared to the prior year. The improvement in training sales was reflected
in
both domestic and international training program and consulting sales.
Our
domestic sales performance improved in nearly all sales regions and
was
primarily attributable to increased client facilitated sales of the
enhanced
The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People
training
course, increased sales performance group sales, and improved sales
of our
The
4
Disciplines of Leadership
and
xQ
offerings.
International
sales improved by $5.8
million,
or 12
percent
primarily due to increased sales in Japan, Mexico, Brazil, the United
Kingdom,
increased licensee royalty revenues, and the translation of foreign
sales
amounts as foreign currencies strengthened against the United States
dollar
during much of fiscal 2005. The favorable impact of currency translation
on
reported international revenues totaled $1.7
million
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005. These increases were partially
offset
by decreased sales performance at our Canadian operations.
Gross
Profit
Our
overall gross margin improved to 59.5
percent
of sales, compared to 56.6
percent
in fiscal 2004. This overall gross margin improvement is consistent
with
quarterly gross margin trends during fiscal 2005 and was primarily
due to
increased training and consulting sales as a percent of total sales,
favorable
product mix changes, lower product costs, and improved margins on our
training
and consulting service sales. Training and consulting service sales,
which
typically have higher gross margins than our product sales, increased
to
41
percent
of total sales during fiscal 2005 compared to 36
percent
in the prior year.
Our
gross
margin on product sales improved to 53.9
percent
compared to 51.6
percent
in fiscal 2004. The improvement was primarily due to a favorable shift
in our
product mix as sales of higher-margin paper products and binders increased
as a
percent of total sales, while sales of lower-margin technology and
specialty
products continued to decline. Additionally, the overall margin on
paper and
binder sales has improved through focused cost reduction efforts, and
improved
inventory management.
Training
and related consulting services gross margin, as a percent of sales
for these
services, improved to 67.5
percent
compared to 65.6
percent
in fiscal 2004. The improvement in our training and consulting services
gross
margin was primarily due to a continued shift in training sales mix
toward
higher-margin courses and offerings, reduced costs for training materials,
such
as participant manuals and related items, and overall lower costs associated
with training sales.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General, and Administrative
- Our
selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased $0.6
million
and improved as a percent of sales to 52.3
percent,
compared to 54.1
percent
in fiscal 2004. Declining SG&A expenses were the direct result of
initiatives specifically designed to reduce our overall operating costs
and is
consistent with operating expense trends during the previous two fiscal
years.
Our cost-reduction efforts have included retail store closures, headcount
reductions, consolidation of corporate office space, and other measures
designed
to focus our resources on critical activities and projects. These efforts
were
partially offset by increased commission expenses related to increased
training
sales, severance costs associated with a former executive officer,
expenses
related to the cancellation of the CEO’s compensation agreement, additional
costs associated with the preferred stock recapitalization, investments
in new
products, and costs of hiring new sales force personnel. The primary
effects of
our cost-cutting initiatives were reflected in reduced rent and utilities
expenses of $3.2
million
and reductions in other SG&A expenses, such as outsourcing and development
costs, that totaled $1.4
million
compared to the prior year. We also reduced our store closure costs
by
$1.3
million
(refer to discussion below) as many of the leases on stores that were
closed
expired during fiscal 2005 and did not require additional costs to
exit the
leases. These improvements were partially offset by $2.7
million
of increased associate costs and $1.7
million
of additional advertising and promotion spending.
We
regularly assess the operating performance of our retail stores, including
previous operating performance trends and projected future profitability.
During
this assessment process, judgments are made as to whether under-performing
or
unprofitable stores should be closed. As a result of this evaluation
process, we
closed 30 stores during fiscal 2005. Retail store closure costs totaled
$1.0
million
during fiscal 2005 compared to $2.3
million
in fiscal 2004, when we closed 18 store locations.
During
fiscal 1999, our Board of Directors approved a plan to restructure
our
operations, which included an initiative to formally exit leased office
space
located in Provo, Utah. During fiscal 2005, we exercised an option,
available
under our master lease agreement, to purchase, and simultaneously sell,
the
office facility to the current tenant. The negotiated purchase price
with the
landlord was $14.0
million
and the tenant agreed to purchase the property for $12.5
million.
These prices were within the range of estimated fair values of the
buildings as
determined by an independent appraisal obtained by the Company. We
paid the
difference between the sale and purchase prices, plus other closing
costs, which
were included as a component of the restructuring plan accrual. After
completion
of the sale transaction, the remaining fiscal 1999 restructuring costs,
which
totaled $0.3
million,
were credited to SG&A expense in our consolidated statement of
operations.
Depreciation
- Depreciation
expense decreased $4.0
million,
or 34
percent,
compared to fiscal 2004 primarily due to the full depreciation or disposal
of
certain property and equipment balances, primarily computer software
and
hardware, and the effects of significantly reduced capital expenditures
during
preceding fiscal years.
Interest
Income and Interest Expense
Interest
Income
-
Our
interest income increased $0.5
million
compared to fiscal 2004 primarily due to increased cash balances and
higher
interest rates on our interest-bearing cash accounts.
Interest
Expense
-
Our
interest expense increased $0.6
million
primarily due to the sale of our corporate headquarters facility and
the
resulting interest component of our lease payments to the landlord.
We are
accounting for the lease on the corporate facility as a financing obligation,
which is accounted for similar to long-term debt.
Gain
on Disposal of Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary
During
fiscal 2003, we purchased approximately 20 percent of the capital
stock
(subsequently diluted to approximately 12 percent ownership) of Agilix
Labs,
Inc. (Agilix), for cash payments totaling $1.0 million. Agilix is
a development
stage enterprise that develops software applications, including the
majority of
our software applications that are available for sale to external
customers.
Although we continue to sell software developed by Agilix, uncertainties
in
Agilix’s business plan developed during our fiscal quarter ended March 1,
2003
and their potential adverse effects on Agilix’s operations and future cash flows
were significant. As a result of this assessment, we determined that
our ability
to recover the investment in Agilix was remote. Accordingly, we impaired
and
expensed our remaining investment in Agilix of $0.9 million during
the quarter
ended March 1, 2003. During the quarter ended May 28, 2005, certain
affiliates
of Agilix purchased the shares of capital stock held by us for $0.5
million
in cash, which was reported as a gain on disposal of an investment
in
unconsolidated subsidiary.
Income
Taxes
The
income tax benefit for fiscal 2005 resulted primarily from reversal
of accruals
related to the resolution of certain tax matters. This tax benefit
was partially
offset by taxes payable by foreign affiliates and taxes withheld on
royalties
from foreign licensees. The income tax provision for fiscal 2004 was
primarily
attributable to taxes payable by foreign affiliates and taxes withheld
on
royalties from foreign licensees. These foreign taxes were partially
offset by
the reversal of accruals related to the resolution of certain tax
matters.
As
of
August 31, 2005 and 2004, given our recent history of significant operating
losses, we had provided a valuation allowance against the majority
of our
deferred income tax assets. As of August 31, 2005 and 2004, we had
net deferred
tax liabilities of $6.9
million
and $7.3
million,
respectively. Our foreign deferred tax assets of $0.9
million
and $0.8
million
at August 31, 2005 and 2004 primarily relate to our operations in Japan.
The net
domestic deferred tax liability of $7.8
million
at August 31, 2005 and the $8.1
million
deferred liability at August 31, 2004 primarily relate to the step-up
of
indefinite-lived intangibles.
Loss
on Recapitalization of Preferred Stock
We
completed our preferred stock recapitalization during the quarter ended
May 28,
2005. Due to the significant modifications to our preferred stock,
we determined
that our previously outstanding preferred stock was replaced with new
classes of
preferred stock and common stock warrants. As a result, the new preferred
stock
was recorded at its fair value on the date of modification, which was
determined
to be equal to the liquidation preference of $25 per share. The difference
between the aggregate fair value of the consideration given (the new
Series A
preferred stock and the common stock warrants) and the carrying value
of the
previously existing Series A preferred stock, which totaled $7.8
million,
was reported as a loss on recapitalization of preferred stock, which
decreased
net income available to common shareholders in the quarter ended May
28, 2005.
Subsequent to May 28, 2005, we used $30.0
million
of the proceeds from the June 2005 sale of our corporate headquarters
facility
to redeem shares of preferred stock under terms of the recapitalization
plan.
QUARTERLY
RESULTS
The
following tables set forth selected unaudited quarterly consolidated
financial
data for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005. The quarterly consolidated financial
data
reflects, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to
fairly
present the results of operations for such periods. Results of any
one or more
quarters are not necessarily indicative of continuing trends.
Quarterly
Financial Information:
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST 31, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
November
26
|
February
25
|
May
27
|
August
31
|
||||||||||
In
thousands, except per share amounts
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
72,351
|
$
|
78,333
|
$
|
63,282
|
$
|
64,657
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
44,406
|
48,173
|
36,292
|
38,514
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expense
|
37,767
|
35,488
|
35,629
|
35,863
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
1,408
|
1,221
|
1,134
|
1,016
|
|||||||||
Amortization
|
1,095
|
908
|
908
|
902
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
4,136
|
10,556
|
(1,379
|
)
|
733
|
||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
3,823
|
11,085
|
(1,735
|
)
|
458
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
3,233
|
9,213
|
1,019
|
15,108
|
|||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(1,379
|
)
|
(1,139
|
)
|
(934
|
)
|
(933
|
)
|
|||||
Income
available to common shareholders
|
1,854
|
8,074
|
85
|
14,175
|
|||||||||
Earnings
(loss) per share available to common shareholders:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
.09
|
$
|
.40
|
$
|
.00
|
$
|
.71
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
.09
|
$
|
.39
|
$
|
.00
|
$
|
.70
|
|||||
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST 31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
November
27
|
February
26
|
May
28
|
August
31
|
|||||||
In
thousands, except per share amounts
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
69,104
|
$
|
82,523
|
$
|
65,788
|
$
|
66,128
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
41,435
|
50,217
|
38,268
|
38,775
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative expense
|
35,930
|
38,939
|
36,095
|
37,341
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
2,178
|
2,320
|
1,848
|
1,428
|
|||||||||
Amortization
|
1,043
|
1,043
|
1,043
|
1,044
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
2,284
|
7,915
|
(718
|
)
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
2,364
|
8,051
|
63
|
(1,377
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
1,526
|
7,086
|
3,069
|
(1,495
|
)
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(2,184
|
)
|
(2,184
|
)
|
(2,184
|
)
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on recapitalization of preferred stock
|
-
|
-
|
(7,753
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Income
(loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
(658
|
)
|
4,902
|
(6,868
|
)
|
(3,213
|
)
|
||||||
Basic
and diluted loss per share attributable to common
shareholders
|
$
|
(.03
|
)
|
$
|
.19
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.16
|
)
|
Our
quarterly results of operations reflect seasonal trends that are primarily
the
result of customers who renew their FranklinCovey Planners on a calendar
year
basis. Domestic training sales are moderately seasonal because of the
timing of
corporate training, which is not typically scheduled as heavily during
holiday
and vacation periods.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we reversed valuation allowances
on certain
deferred income tax assets which had a $20.4
million
favorable impact on our net income and net income available to common
shareholders for that period.
During
the quarter ended May 27, 2006, we determined that our Mexico subsidiary
had
misstated its financial results in prior periods by recording improper
sales
transactions and not recording all operating expenses in proper periods.
We
determined that the misstatements occurred during fiscal 2002 through
fiscal
2006 in various amounts. The Audit Committee engaged an independent
legal firm
to investigate the misstatements and they concluded that such misstatements
were
intentional. The Company determined that the impact of these misstatements
was
immaterial to previously issued financial statements and we recorded
a
$0.5
million
decrease to international sales and a $0.5
million
increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses during the
quarter
ended May 27, 2006 to correct these misstatements. We have taken actions
as
recommended by the investigators to prevent future misstatements, which
include
enhancements to internal control over foreign operations.
Quarterly
fluctuations may also be affected by other factors including the introduction
of
new products or training seminars, the addition of new institutional
customers,
the timing of large corporate orders, the elimination of unprofitable
products
or training services, and the closure of retail stores.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historically,
our primary sources of capital have been net cash provided by operating
activities, line-of-credit financing, long-term borrowings, asset sales,
and the
issuance of preferred and common stock. We currently rely primarily
upon cash
flows from operating activities and cash on hand to maintain adequate
liquidity
and working capital levels. At August 31, 2006 we had $30.6
million
of cash and cash equivalents compared to $51.7
million
at August 31, 2005. Our net working capital (current assets less current
liabilities) decreased to $38.7
million
at August 31, 2006 compared to $49.9
million
at August 31, 2005, primarily due to reduced cash and cash
equivalents.
The
following discussion is a description of the primary factors affecting
our cash
flows and their effects upon our liquidity and capital resources during
the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
During
fiscal 2006 our net cash provided by operating activities was $17.0
million
compared to $22.3
million
in fiscal 2005. Our primary source of cash from operating activities
was the
sale of goods and services to our customers in the normal course of
business.
The primary uses of cash for operating activities were payments to
suppliers for
materials used in products sold, payments for direct costs necessary
to conduct
training programs, and payments for selling, general, and administrative
expenses. Our cash flows from operating activities were unfavorably
affected by
decreased sales compared to fiscal 2005, although we recognized cash
flow
improvements from operating activities through reduced selling, general,
and
administrative expenses and corresponding reduced cash payments for
costs and
expenses related to generating revenues, which was reflected by improved
income
from operations.
Our
cash
flows generated from improved operating results was offset by cash
used for
working capital items. During fiscal 2006, our primary uses of cash
for
operating activities were related to reducing accrued liability and
accounts
payable balances, payment of income taxes in jurisdictions where we
were unable
to utilize existing loss carryforwards, and the impact of increased
accounts
receivable that were primarily the result of increased sales in our
OSBU during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. We believe that efforts to optimize
working
capital balances combined with existing and planned efforts to increase
sales,
including sales of new products and services, and cost-cutting initiatives,
will
improve our cash flows from operating activities in future periods.
However, the
success of these efforts is dependent upon numerous factors, many of
which are
not within our control.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities and Capital Expenditures
Net
cash
used for investing activities totaled $8.3
million
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. Our primary uses of investing
cash
were the purchases of property and equipment totaling $4.4
million
and $4.0
million
spent in curriculum development. Property and equipment purchases consisted
primarily of computer hardware, software, and leasehold improvements
for
subleased areas of our corporate campus and in certain of our retail
stores.
During fiscal 2006, we invested in curriculum development primarily
related to
new leadership and strategy execution offerings.
During
fiscal 2007, we expect to spend $10.5
million
on purchases of property and equipment and $3.1
million
on curriculum development activities. The increase in capital spending
on
property and equipment is primarily due to the purchase of new printing
presses
and equipment in connection with the reconfiguration of our printing
operations.
However, actual capital spending is based upon a variety of factors
and may
differ from these estimates.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
Net
cash
used for financing activities during fiscal 2006 totaled $29.9
million.
Our primary uses of cash for financing activities were redemptions
of preferred
stock totaling $20.0
million,
purchases of common stock totaling $5.2
million,
preferred dividend payments totaling $4.9
million,
and principal payments on our long-term debt and financing arrangement
totaling
$1.1
million.
Since we recapitalized our preferred stock in fiscal 2005, we have
redeemed
$50.0
million,
or 2.0
million
shares, of our outstanding preferred stock. These redemptions have
reduced our
preferred dividend obligation and corresponding financing cash outflows
by
$5.0
million
per year. We anticipate making additional preferred stock redemptions
under the
terms of our recapitalization plan in future periods.
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company has not structured any special purpose or variable interest
entities, or
participated in any commodity trading activities, which would expose
us to
potential undisclosed liabilities or create adverse consequences to
our
liquidity. Required contractual payments primarily consist of payments
to EDS
for outsourcing services related to information systems, warehousing
and
distribution, and call center operations; payments on a financing obligation
resulting from the sale of our corporate campus; minimum rent payments
for
retail store and sales office space; cash payments for Series A preferred
stock
dividends; mortgage payments on certain buildings and property; cash
payments
for new printing services equipment; short-term purchase obligations
for
inventory items; and monitoring fees paid to a Series A preferred stock
investor. Our expected payments on these obligations over the next
five fiscal
years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Minimum
required payments to EDS for outsourcing services
|
$
|
17,217
|
$
|
15,901
|
$
|
15,927
|
$
|
15,577
|
$
|
15,298
|
$
|
73,233
|
$
|
153,153
|
||||||||
Required
payments on corporate campus financing obligation
|
3,045
|
3,045
|
3,045
|
3,055
|
3,115
|
49,957
|
65,262
|
|||||||||||||||
Minimum
operating lease payments
|
8,475
|
7,228
|
5,564
|
4,012
|
2,402
|
6,013
|
33,694
|
|||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend payments(1)
|
3,734
|
3,734
|
3,734
|
3,734
|
3,734
|
-
|
18,670
|
|||||||||||||||
Debt
payments(2)
|
176
|
168
|
160
|
153
|
145
|
435
|
1,237
|
|||||||||||||||
Contractual
computer hardware purchases(3)
|
535
|
483
|
556
|
587
|
525
|
3,192
|
5,878
|
|||||||||||||||
Payments
for new printing services equipment(4)
|
3,137
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,137
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
10,523
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,523
|
|||||||||||||||
Monitoring
fees paid to a preferred stock investor(1)
|
166
|
166
|
166
|
166
|
166
|
-
|
830
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
expected contractual obligation
payments
|
$
|
47,008
|
$
|
30,725
|
$
|
29,152
|
$
|
27,284
|
$
|
25,385
|
$
|
132,830
|
$
|
292,384
|
_____________________________
(1)
|
Amount
reflects $37.3
million of outstanding preferred stock. The amount of cash
dividends and
monitoring fees that we are obligated to pay will decline
as shares of
preferred stock are redeemed.
|
(2)
|
The
Company’s variable rate debt payments include interest payments at
7.0%,
which was the applicable interest rate at September 29,
2006.
|
(3)
|
We
are contractually obligated by our EDS outsourcing agreement
to purchase
the necessary computer hardware to keep such equipment up
to current
specifications. Amounts shown are estimated capital purchases
of computer
hardward under terms of the EDS outsourcing agreement and
its
amendments.
|
(4)
|
In
August 2006, we signed contracts to purchase new printing equipment
for $3.1
million in cash as part of a plan to reconfigure our printing
services
operation. The payments are due at specified times during
fiscal 2007 that
coincide with the installation and successful operation of
the new
equipment.
|
Other
Items
The
Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital
to allow
certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of
our common
stock. For further information regarding our management common stock
loan
program, refer to Note 9
in
our
consolidated financial statements. The inability of the Company to
collect all,
or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse impact upon
our
financial position and future cash flows compared to full collection
of the
loans.
Going
forward, we will continue to incur costs necessary for the operation
and
potential growth of the business. We anticipate using cash on hand,
cash
provided by operating activities on the condition that we can continue
to
improve our cash flows generated from operating activities, and other
financing
alternatives, if necessary, for these expenditures. We anticipate that
our
existing capital resources should be adequate to enable us to maintain
our
operations for at least the upcoming twelve months. However, our ability
to
maintain adequate capital for our operations in the future is dependent
upon a
number of factors, including sales trends, our ability to contain costs,
redemptions of preferred stock, purchases of our common stock, levels
of capital
expenditures, collection of accounts receivable, and other factors.
Some of the
factors that influence our operations are not within our control, such
as
economic conditions and the introduction of new technology and products
by our
competitors. We will continue to monitor our liquidity position and
may pursue
additional financing alternatives, if required, to maintain sufficient
resources
for future growth and capital requirements. However, there can be no
assurance
such financing alternatives will be available to us on acceptable
terms.
USE
OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with
accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
significant
accounting polices that we used to prepare our consolidated financial
statements
are outlined in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, which
are
presented in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some
of those
accounting policies require us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Management
regularly
evaluates its estimates and assumptions and bases those estimates and
assumptions on historical experience, factors that are believed to
be reasonable
under the circumstances, and requirements under accounting principles
generally
accepted in the United States of America. Actual results may differ
from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions, including changes
in
economic conditions and other circumstances that are not in our control,
but
which may have an impact on these estimates and our actual financial
results.
The
following items require the most significant judgment and often involve
complex
estimates:
Revenue
Recognition
We
derive
revenues primarily from the following sources:
·
|
Products
-
We sell planners, binders, planner accessories, handheld
electronic
devices, and other related products that are primarily sold
through our
CSBU channels.
|
|
·
|
Training
and Consulting Services
-
We provide training and consulting services to both organizations
and
individuals in strategic execution, leadership, productivity,
goal
alignment, sales force performance, and communication effectiveness
skills. These training programs and services are primarily
sold through
our OSBU channels.
|
The
Company recognizes revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an agreement
exists,
2) delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered,
3) the price
to the customer is fixed and determinable, and 4) collectibility is
reasonably
assured. For product sales, these conditions are generally met upon
shipment of
the product to the customer or by completion of the sale transaction
in a retail
store. For training and service sales, these conditions are generally
met upon
presentation of the training seminar or delivery of the consulting
services.
Some
of
our training and consulting contracts contain multiple deliverable
elements that
include training along with other products and services. In accordance
with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Accounting
for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,
sales
arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units
of
accounting if the deliverables in the sales contract meet the following
criteria: 1) the delivered training or product has value to the client
on a
standalone basis; 2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the
fair value
of undelivered items; and 3) delivery of any undelivered item is probable.
The
overall contract consideration is allocated among the separate units
of
accounting based upon their fair values, with the amount allocated
to the
delivered item being limited to the amount that is not contingent upon
the
delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance
conditions.
If the fair value of all undelivered elements exits, but fair value
does not
exist for one or more delivered elements, the residual method is used.
Under the
residual method, the amount of consideration allocated to the delivered
items
equals the total contract consideration less the aggregate fair value
of the
undelivered items. Fair value of the undelivered items is based upon
the normal
pricing practices for the Company’s existing training programs, consulting
services, and other products, which are generally the prices of the
items when
sold separately.
Revenue
is recognized on software sales in accordance with Statement of Position
(SOP)
97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition
as
amended by SOP 98-09. SOP 97-2, as amended, generally requires revenue
earned on
software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software
products and
support to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair
value of the
elements based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE). The majority
of the
Company’s software sales have elements, including a license and post contract
customer support (PCS). Currently the Company does not have VSOE for
either the
license or support elements of its software sales. Accordingly, revenue
is
deferred until the only undelivered element is PCS and the total arrangement
fee
is recognized ratably over the support period.
Our
international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where
we do
not have a directly-owned operation. Licensee companies are unrelated
entities
that have been granted a license to translate the Company’s content and
curriculum, adapt the content and curriculum to the local culture,
and sell the
Company’s training seminars and products in a specific country or region.
Licensees are required to pay us royalties based upon a percentage
of the
licensee’s sales. The Company recognizes royalty income each period based upon
the sales information reported to the Company from the licensee.
Revenue
is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated
amounts
for discounts and product returns.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective
September 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions
of SFAS No.
123R, using the modified prospective transition method, and therefore
have not
restated prior periods’ financial results. Under this
method, we recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments
granted
after September 1, 2006 and prior to but not yet vested as of September
1, 2006,
in accordance with SFAS No. 123R. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No.
123R, we
accounted for share-based payments under APB No. 25, and accordingly,
we
generally recognized compensation expense from stock options only when
we
granted options with an exercise price below the market price on the
date of
grant or made modifications to stock option terms which increased the
fair value
of the award.
During
fiscal 2006, we granted performance based compensation awards to certain
employees in a Board of Director approved long-term incentive plan
(LTIP). These
performance based share awards grant each participant the right to
receive a
certain number of shares of common stock based upon the achievement
of specified
financial goals at the end of a predetermined performance period. The
LTIP
awards granted during fiscal 2006 cliff vest on August 31, 2008, which
is the
completion of a three-year performance period. The number of shares
that are
finally awarded to LTIP participants is variable and is based entirely
upon the
achievement of a combination of performance objectives related to sales
growth
(fiscal 2008 sales compared to fiscal 2005 sales) and cumulative operating
income during the performance period. Due to the variable number of
shares that
may be issued under the LTIP, we reevaluate the LTIP on a quarterly
basis and
adjust the number of shares expected to be awarded based upon financial
results
of the Company as compared to the performance goals set for the award.
Adjustments to the number of shares awarded, and to the corresponding
compensation expense, are based upon estimated future performance and
are made
on a cumulative basis at the date of adjustment based upon the probable
number
of shares to be awarded. Actual results could differ from estimates
made during
the service, or vesting, period. The Compensation Committee initially
granted
awards for 377,665
shares
(target award) of common stock and the number of shares finally awarded
will
range from zero shares, if a minimum level of performance is not achieved,
to
200 percent of the target award, if specifically defined performance
criteria is
achieved during the three-year performance period. The minimum sales
growth
necessary for participants to receive any shares under the LTIP is
7.5
percent
and the minimum cumulative operating income is $36.2
million.
The percentage of target shares awarded is based upon the combination
of these
factors as shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
30.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
22.5%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
15.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
11.8
%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
7.5%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$36.20
|
$56.80
|
$72.30
|
$108.50
|
$144.60
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
Based
upon fiscal 2006 financial performance and estimated performance through
the
remaining service period, the number of performance awards granted
during fiscal
2006 was reduced at August 31, 2006 to 337,588
shares,
which resulted in a cumulative adjustment to our fiscal 2006 operating
results
of $0.1
million.
The compensation cost of the LTIP grant was $0.5 million in fiscal
2006 and the
total compensation cost of the LTIP will be equal to the number of
shares
finally issued multiplied by $6.60 per share, which was the fair value
of the
common shares determined at the grant date.
We
estimate the value of our stock option awards on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. However, the Company did not grant
any stock
options in fiscal years 2006 or 2005 and at August 31, 2006 the remaining
cost
associated with our unvested stock options was insignificant.
Accounts
Receivable Valuation
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not
bear
interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate
of
the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts receivable
balance. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon
historical
write-off experience
and current economic conditions and we review the adequacy of our allowance
for
doubtful accounts on a regular basis. Receivable balances past due
over 90 days,
which exceed a specified dollar amount, are reviewed individually for
collectibility. Account balances are charged off against the allowance
after all
means of collection have been exhausted and the probability for recovery
is
considered remote. We do not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure
related
to our customers.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using
the
first-in, first-out method. Our inventories are comprised primarily
of dated
calendar products and other non-dated products such as binders, handheld
electronic devices, stationery, training products, and other accessories.
Provision is made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their
estimated
net realizable value. In assessing the realization of inventories,
we make
judgments regarding future demand requirements and compare these assessments
with current and committed inventory levels. Inventory requirements
may change
based on projected customer demand, technological and product life
cycle
changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors
that
could affect the valuation of our inventories.
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized,
but rather
are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events
or
circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey
trade name
intangible asset has been deemed to have an indefinite life. This intangible
asset is assigned to the OSBU and is tested for impairment using the
present
value of estimated royalties on trade name related revenues, which
consist
primarily of training seminars, international licensee royalties, and
related
products. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability
of our
indefinite-lived intangible asset change in the future, significant
impairment
charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations
and
financial condition. Based upon our fiscal 2006 evaluation, our trade-name
related revenues and licensee royalties would have to suffer significant
reductions before we would be required to impair the Covey trade
name.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for
possible
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate
of
undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over the remaining
useful lives
in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is recoverable.
If the
carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows
of the
assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between
the
carrying values of the assets and their estimated fair values. Impairment
of
long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there
are
identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets.
The
evaluation of long-lived assets requires us to use estimates of future
cash
flows. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability
of our
long-lived tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in
the future,
significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect
our
results of operations and financial condition.
Income
Taxes
The
Company regularly evaluates United States federal and various state
and foreign
jurisdiction income tax exposures. The tax benefits of tax exposure
items are
not recognized in the provision for income taxes unless it is probable
that the
benefits will be sustained, without regard to the likelihood of tax
examination.
A tax exposure reserve represents the difference between the recognition
of
benefits related to exposure items for income tax reporting purposes
and
financial reporting purposes. The tax exposure reserve is classified
as a
component of the current income taxes payable account. The Company
adds interest
and penalties, if applicable,
each period to the reserve which is recorded as a component of the
overall
income tax provision.
The
Company recognizes the benefits of the tax exposure items in the financial
statements, that is, the reserve is reversed, when it becomes probable
that the
tax position will be sustained. To assess the probability of sustaining
a tax
position, the Company considers all available positive evidence. In
many
instances, sufficient positive evidence will not be available until
the
expiration of the statute of limitations for Internal Revenue Service
audits, at
which time the entire benefit will be recognized as a discrete item
in the
applicable period.
The
calculation of our income tax provision or benefit, as applicable,
requires
estimates of future taxable income or losses. During the course of
the fiscal
year, these estimates are compared to actual financial results and
adjustments
may be made to our tax provision or benefit to reflect these revised
estimates.
The
Company continually assesses the need for valuation allowances against
its
deferred income tax assets, considering recent profitability, known
trends and
events, and expected future transactions. For several years prior to
the year
ended August 31, 2006, our history of significant operating losses
precluded us
from demonstrating that it was more likely than not that the related
benefits
from deferred income tax deductions and foreign tax carryforwards would
be
realized. Accordingly, we recorded valuation allowances on the majority
of our
deferred income tax assets.
In
fiscal
2006 we reversed the majority of these valuation allowances. Due to
improved
operating performance, business models, and expectations regarding
future
taxable income, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than
not that
the benefits of domestic operating loss carryforwards, together with
the
benefits of other deferred income tax assets will be realized. Thus,
we reversed
the valuation allowances on certain of our domestic deferred income
tax assets,
except for $2.2 million related to foreign tax credits.
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Error
Corrections - In
May
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No.
20 and FASB
Statement No. 3.
Statement No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for
and reporting
of a change in accounting principle and applies to all voluntary
changes in
accounting principle. This statement requires retrospective application
to prior
periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it
is
impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or
the cumulative
effect of an accounting change. Further, SFAS No. 154 requires that
the new
accounting principle be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities
as of
the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application
is
practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to the opening
balance
of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of shareholders’ equity)
for the period that is being reported in an income statement. This
statement
also carries forward, without change, the guidance in APB
Opinion No. 20 for reporting the correction of an error in previously
issued
financial statements and a change in accounting estimate. Statement
No. 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in
fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005 and will thus be effective for
our fiscal year
beginning September 1, 2006.
Sales
Tax Presentation
- In
June 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-03, How
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities
Should
Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net
Presentation).
This
consensus provides that the presentation of taxes assessed by a
governmental
authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction
between a
seller and a customer on either a gross basis (included in revenues
and costs)
or on a net basis (excluded from revenues) is an accounting policy
decision that
should be disclosed. The provisions of EITF 06-03 become effective
for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006.
The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting EITF 06-03 on the presentation
of
our consolidated financial statements.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
- In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No.
109.
This
interpretation prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement
standard, as well as criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing,
and
measuring tax positions for financial statement purposes. This interpretation
also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainties
as they
relate to income tax accounting and is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN
No. 48 no
later than September 1, 2007 (fiscal 2008). We are currently in the
process of
evaluating the impact of FIN No. 48 on our financial statements. The
cumulative
effect from the adoption of FIN No. 48, if any, will be an adjustment
to
beginning retained earnings in the year of adoption.
Evaluation
of Misstatements - In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released
Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements
in
Current Year Financial Statements,
which
provides the Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial
statement misstatements, such as assessing both the carryover and
reversing
effects of prior year misstatements on the current year financial
statements.
The evaluation requirements of SAB No. 108 are effective for years
ending after
November 15, 2006. We have not yet determined the impact of adopting
the
provisions of SAB No. 108.
Fair
Value Measures - In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measures.
This
statement establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value,
sets out
a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures
about
fair-value measurements. Statement No. 157 only applies to fair-value
measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards except for measurements of share-based payments and measurements
that
are similar to, but not intended to be, fair value. This statement
is effective
for the specified fair value measures for financial statements issued
for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will thus be effective
for the
Company in fiscal 2008. We have not yet completed our analysis of the
impact of
SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements.
REGULATORY
COMPLIANCE
The
Company is registered in states in which we do business that have a
sales tax
and collects and remits sales or use tax on retail sales made through
its stores
and catalog sales. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations
has not
had a material effect on our operations.
INFLATION
AND CHANGING PRICES
Inflation
has not had a material effect on our operations. However, future inflation
may
have an impact on the price of materials used in the production of
planners and
related products, including paper and leather materials. We may not
be able to
pass on such increased costs to our customers.
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT
OF
1995
Certain
written and oral statements made by the Company or our representatives
in this
report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
press releases, conferences, Internet webcasts, or otherwise, are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement
that
may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance,
or
achievements, and may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,”
“estimate,” “project,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. In our reports
and filings we may make forward looking statements regarding future
sales
activity, anticipated expenses, estimated capital expenditures, and
cash flow
estimates used to determine the fair value of long-lived assets. These,
and
other forward-looking statements, are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties
that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to
time in
reports filed by us with the SEC, including reports
on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K. Such risks and uncertainties include,
but are not
limited to, the matters discussed in Item 1A of this report on Form
10-K
entitled “Risk Factors.” In addition, such risks and uncertainties may include
unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas:
unanticipated costs or capital expenditures; difficulties encountered
by EDS in
operating and maintaining our information systems and controls, including
without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning,
inventory
control, and order fulfillment; delays or unanticipated outcomes relating
to our
strategic plans; dependence on existing products or services; the rate
and
consumer acceptance of new product introductions; competition; the
number and
nature of customers and their product orders, including changes in
the timing or
mix of product or training orders; pricing of our products and services
and
those of competitors; adverse publicity; and other factors which may
adversely
affect our business.
The
risks
included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may
include
additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial
performance, including the risk factors noted in Item 1A of this report.
Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment.
New
risk factors may emerge and it is not possible for our management to
predict all
such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors
on our
business or the extent to which any single factor, or combination of
factors,
may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained
in
forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors
should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual
results.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile.
In addition,
the stock markets in general have experienced increased volatility.
Factors such
as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues and earnings or losses
and our
failure to meet expectations could have a significant impact on the
market price
of our common stock. In addition, the price of our common stock can
change for
reasons unrelated to our performance. Due to our low market capitalization,
the
price of our common stock may also be affected by conditions such as
a lack of
analyst coverage and fewer potential investors.
Forward-looking
statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and the
Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any of these
statements
in the future except as required by law. Actual future performance
and results
will differ and may differ materially from that contained in or suggested
by
forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in
this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.
ITEM
7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Market
Risk of Financial Instruments
The
Company is exposed to financial instrument market risk primarily through
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
To manage
risks associated with foreign currency exchange and interest rates,
we make
limited use of derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are financial
instruments that derive their value from one or more underlying financial
instruments. As a matter of policy, our derivative instruments are
entered into
for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do
not
constitute positions that are independent of those exposures. In addition,
we do
not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes,
nor are
we party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The notional amounts
of
derivatives do not represent actual amounts exchanged by the parties
to the
instrument, and, thus, are not a measure of exposure to us through
our use of
derivatives. Additionally, we enter into derivative agreements only
with highly
rated counterparties and we do not expect to incur any losses resulting
from
non-performance by other parties.
Foreign
Exchange Sensitivity
- Due to
the global nature of our operations, we are subject to risks associated
with
transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the United
States
dollar, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in
foreign
currencies to United States dollars as a normal part of the reporting
process.
The objective of our foreign currency risk management activities is
to reduce
foreign currency risk in the consolidated financial statements. In
order to
manage foreign currency risks, we make limited use of foreign currency
forward contracts and other foreign currency related derivative instruments.
Although we cannot eliminate all aspects of our foreign currency risk,
we
believe that our strategy, which includes the use of derivative instruments,
can
reduce the impacts of foreign currency related issues on our consolidated
financial statements. The following is a description of our use of
foreign
currency derivative instruments.
Foreign
Currency Forward Contracts - During
the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we utilized
foreign
currency forward contracts to manage the volatility of certain intercompany
financing transactions and other transactions that are denominated
in foreign
currencies. Because these contracts do not meet specific hedge accounting
requirements, gains and losses on these contracts, which expire on
a quarterly
basis, are recognized currently and are used to offset a portion of
the gains or
losses of the related accounts. The gains and losses on these contracts
were
recorded as a component of SG&A expense in our consolidated income
statements and had the following net impact on the periods indicated
(in
thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Losses
on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
(346
|
)
|
$
|
(437
|
)
|
$
|
(641
|
)
|
|
Gains
on foreign exchange contracts
|
415
|
127
|
227
|
|||||||
Net
gain (loss) on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
69
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
At
August
31, 2006, the fair value of these contracts, which was determined using
the
estimated amount at which contracts could be settled based upon forward
market
exchange rates, was insignificant. The notional amounts of our foreign
currency
sell contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting were as follows
at
August 31, 2006 (in thousands):
Contract
Description
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Notional
Amount in U.S. Dollars
|
|||||
Japanese
Yen
|
290,000
|
$
|
2,491
|
||||
Australian
Dollars
|
1,500
|
1,148
|
|||||
Mexican
Pesos
|
11,650
|
1,061
|
Net
Investment Hedges - During
fiscal 2005 and 2004, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts
that
were designed to manage foreign currency risks related to the value
of our net
investment in directly-owned operations located in Canada, Japan, and
the United
Kingdom. These three offices comprise the majority of our net investment
in
foreign operations. These foreign currency forward instruments qualified
for
hedge accounting and corresponding gains and losses were recorded as
a component
of accumulated other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance
sheet.
During fiscal 2005 and 2004, we recognized the following net losses
on our net
investment hedging contracts (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Losses
on net investment hedge contracts
|
$
|
(384
|
)
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
Gains
on net investment hedge contracts
|
66
|
130
|
|||||
Net
losses on investment hedge contracts
|
$
|
(318
|
)
|
$
|
(207
|
)
|
As
of
August 31, 2005, we had settled our net investment hedge contracts
and we did
not utilize any net investment hedge contracts in fiscal 2006. However,
we may
continue to utilize net investment hedge contracts in future periods
as a
component of our overall foreign currency risk strategy.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity - The
Company is exposed to fluctuations in United States’ interest rates primarily as
a result of the cash and cash equivalents that we hold. At August 31,
2006, our
debt balances consist of a financing obligation from the June 2005
sale of the
corporate campus and one variable-rate mortgage on certain of our buildings
and
property located in Canada. The financing obligation has a payment
structure
equivalent to a lease arrangement with an interest rate of 7.7 percent.
Our
variable-rate mortgage has interest charged at the Canadian Prime Rate
plus one
percent (7.0
percent
at August 31, 2006) and requires payments through January 2015. A one
percent
increase in the interest rate on our Canadian mortgage would increase
our total
interest expense by $0.1
million
over the term of the mortgage.
During
the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we were not
party to any
interest rate swap agreements or similar derivative instruments.
ITEM
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary
Data
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The
management of Franklin Covey Co. is responsible for establishing
and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company
(including
its consolidated subsidiaries). The Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the
United States of America.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of
effectiveness in future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A
material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that
a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented
or detected. As of August 31, 2006, we conducted an assessment
of the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting using
the criteria in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework,
established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway
Commission (COSO). As a result of our assessment, we identified
the following
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
as of August 31,
2006:
· |
Liability
accrual for services -
Our policies and procedures regarding capturing and recording
accounts
payable for services were inadequate to ensure the completeness
and
accuracy of recording liabilities in the correct period
in which the
service was provided. As a result, misstatements existed
in the Company's
current liabilities that were corrected prior to the issuance
of the
fiscal 2006 consolidated financial statements. This material
weakness
resulted in a more than remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of
the Company’s annual or interim financial statements would not be
prevented or detected.
|
We
determined that the aforementioned deficiency constitutes a material
weakness in
our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31,
2006.
Accordingly, we concluded that we did not maintain effective internal
control
over financial reporting as of August 31, 2006.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued
an audit
report on management's assessment of our internal control over
financial
reporting. Their report is included in Item 8 of this Report on
Form
10-K.
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Franklin
Covey Co.:
We
have
audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Franklin
Covey Co. did
not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
as of August
31, 2006, because of the effect of a material weakness identified
in
management's assessment, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework
issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
Franklin Covey Co.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our
responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion
on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over
financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A
material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that
a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented
or detected. The following material weakness has been identified
and included in
management's assessment: The Company determined that its policies
and procedures
regarding capturing and recording accounts payable for services
were inadequate
to ensure the completeness and accuracy of recording liabilities
in the correct
period in which the service was provided. As a result, misstatements
existed in
the Company’s current liabilities in its preliminary fiscal 2006 consolidated
financial statements. The material weakness resulted in more than
a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim
financial statements would not be prevented or detected.
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets
of Franklin
Covey Co. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended August 31, 2006. This material weakness was considered
in
determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied
in our audit
of the 2006 consolidated financial statements, and this report does
not affect
our report dated November 13, 2006, which expressed an unqualified
opinion on
those consolidated financial statements.
In
our
opinion, management's assessment that Franklin Covey Co. did not
maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of August
31, 2006, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established
in
Internal
Control—Integrated Framework
issued
by COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material
weakness
described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control
criteria,
Franklin Covey Co. has not maintained effective internal control
over financial
reporting as of August 31, 2006, based on criteria established
in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued
by COSO.
/s/
KPMG
LLP
Salt
Lake
City, Utah
November
13, 2006
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Franklin
Covey Co.:
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Franklin
Covey Co. and
subsidiaries as of August 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August
31, 2006.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Franklin Covey
Co. and
subsidiaries as of August 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of
their operations
and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended August
31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Franklin Covey Co.'s
internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2006,
based on
criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework
issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO),
and our report dated November 13, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion
on
management’s assessment of and an adverse opinion on the effective operation
of
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/
KPMG
LLP
Salt
Lake
City, Utah
November
13, 2006
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
In
thousands, except per share data
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
30,587
|
$
|
51,690
|
|||
Restricted
cash
|
699
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of
$979
and $1,425
|
24,254
|
22,399
|
|||||
Inventories
|
21,790
|
20,975
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,130
|
2,396
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
6,359
|
7,023
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
87,120
|
105,182
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
33,318
|
35,277
|
|||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
79,532
|
83,348
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,340
|
375
|
|||||
Other
long-term assets
|
12,249
|
9,051
|
|||||
$
|
216,559
|
$
|
233,233
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt and financing obligation
|
$
|
585
|
$
|
1,088
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
13,769
|
13,704
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
1,924
|
3,996
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
32,170
|
36,536
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
48,448
|
55,324
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and financing obligation, less current portion
|
33,559
|
34,086
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,192
|
1,282
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liabilities
|
11
|
9,715
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
83,210
|
100,407
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Notes 1,
5,
6,
and 10)
|
|||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock - Series A, no par value; 4,000 shares authorized,
1,494 and 2,294
shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference totaling
$38,278
and $58,778
|
37,345
|
57,345
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.05 par value; 40,000 shares authorized, 27,056 shares
issued
|
1,353
|
1,353
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
185,691
|
190,760
|
|||||
Common
stock warrants
|
7,611
|
7,611
|
|||||
Retained
earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
14,075
|
(14,498
|
)
|
||||
Deferred
compensation on unvested stock grants
|
-
|
(1,055
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
653
|
556
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost, 7,083
shares and 6,465
shares
|
(113,379
|
)
|
(109,246
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
133,349
|
132,826
|
|||||
$
|
216,559
|
$
|
233,233
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENTS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST 31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
In
thousands, except per share amounts
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
156,205
|
$
|
167,179
|
$
|
177,184
|
||||
Training
and consulting services
|
122,418
|
116,363
|
98,250
|
|||||||
278,623
|
283,542
|
275,434
|
||||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
||||||||||
Products
|
70,516
|
77,074
|
85,803
|
|||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
40,722
|
37,773
|
33,830
|
|||||||
111,238
|
114,847
|
119,633
|
||||||||
Gross
profit
|
167,385
|
168,695
|
155,801
|
|||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
144,747
|
148,305
|
148,918
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
4,779
|
7,774
|
11,774
|
|||||||
Amortization
|
3,813
|
4,173
|
4,173
|
|||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
14,046
|
8,443
|
(9,064
|
)
|
||||||
Interest
income
|
1,334
|
944
|
481
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2,622
|
)
|
(786
|
)
|
(218
|
)
|
||||
Recovery
from legal settlement
|
873
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Gain
on disposal of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
-
|
500
|
-
|
|||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
13,631
|
9,101
|
(8,801
|
)
|
||||||
Income
tax benefit (provision)
|
14,942
|
1,085
|
(1,349
|
)
|
||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
28,573
|
10,186
|
(10,150
|
)
|
||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(4,385
|
)
|
(8,270
|
)
|
(8,735
|
)
|
||||
Loss
on recapitalization of preferred stock
|
-
|
(7,753
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
$
|
24,188
|
$
|
(5,837
|
)
|
$
|
(18,885
|
)
|
||
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders per share
(Note
17):
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
||
Diluted
|
$
|
1.18
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
||
Weighted
average number of common shares (Note 17):
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
20,134
|
19,949
|
19,734
|
|||||||
Diluted
|
20,554
|
19,949
|
19,734
|
|||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
28,573
|
$
|
10,186
|
$
|
(10,150
|
)
|
|||
Adjustment
for fair value of hedge derivatives
|
-
|
(318
|
)
|
(207
|
)
|
|||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
97
|
(152
|
)
|
788
|
||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$
|
28,670
|
$
|
9,716
|
$
|
(9,569
|
)
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Series
A Preferred Stock Shares
|
Series
A Preferred Stock Amount
|
Common
Stock Shares
|
Common
Stock Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
Common
Stock Warrants
|
Retained
Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)
|
Notes
and Interest Receivable
|
Deferred
Compensa-tion
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Treasury
Stock Shares
|
Treasury
Stock Amount
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In
thousands
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at August 31, 2003
|
873
|
87,203
|
27,056
|
1,353
|
221,968
|
-
|
(3,912
|
)
|
(8,459
|
)
|
-
|
445
|
(7,007
|
)
|
(120,931
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(5,866
|
)
|
(2,869
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock from treasury
|
(27
|
)
|
99
|
181
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
(93
|
)
|
(182
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
788
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
for fair value of hedge derivatives
|
(207
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modification
of management stock loans
|
(7,565
|
)
|
7,565
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation
of note receivable from sale of common stock
|
1,495
|
894
|
(121
|
)
|
(2,389
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested
stock award
|
(4,420
|
)
|
(829
|
)
|
304
|
5,249
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock held in non-qualified deferred compensation plan
|
(210
|
)
|
(953
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
97
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(10,150
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at August 31, 2004
|
873
|
87,203
|
27,056
|
1,353
|
205,585
|
-
|
(16,931
|
)
|
-
|
(732
|
)
|
1,026
|
(7,028
|
)
|
(119,025
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(8,270
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extinguishment
of previously existing Series A Preferred Stock
|
(873
|
)
|
(87,203
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock recapitalization
|
3,494
|
87,345
|
7,611
|
(7,753
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock redemption
|
(1,200
|
)
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock from treasury
|
(257
|
)
|
42
|
366
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
(23
|
)
|
(91
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested
stock awards
|
(5,192
|
)
|
(1,114
|
)
|
352
|
6,234
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
791
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO
fully-vested stock award
|
(2,837
|
)
|
187
|
3,241
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-qualified
deferred compensation plan treasury stock transactions
|
892
|
5
|
29
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments
on management common stock loans
|
839
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustments
|
(152
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment
for fair value of hedge derivatives
|
(318
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
10,186
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at August 31, 2005
|
2,294
|
$
|
57,345
|
27,056
|
$
|
1,353
|
$
|
190,760
|
$
|
7,611
|
$
|
(14,498
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(1,055
|
)
|
$
|
556
|
(6,465
|
)
|
$
|
(109,246
|
)
|
||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(4,385
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock redemptions
|
(800
|
)
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock from treasury
|
(334
|
)
|
69
|
743
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
(690
|
)
|
(5,167
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested
stock award
|
(458
|
)
|
27
|
458
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
862
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
of deferred compensation upon adoption of SFAS 123R
|
(1,055
|
)
|
1,055
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receipt
of common stock as consideration for payment on management
common stock
loans
|
301
|
(24
|
)
|
(167
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustments
|
97
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
28,573
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at August 31, 2006
|
1,494
|
$
|
37,345
|
27,056
|
$
|
1,353
|
$
|
185,691
|
$
|
7,611
|
$
|
14,075
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
653
|
(7,083
|
)
|
$
|
(113,379
|
)
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST 31,
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|||||
In
thousands
|
||||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
28,573
|
$
|
10,186
|
$
|
(10,150
|
)
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
10,289
|
13,939
|
17,717
|
|||||||
Gain
on disposal of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
-
|
(500
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Restructuring
cost reversal
|
-
|
(306
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(15,435
|
)
|
(410
|
)
|
623
|
|||||
Compensation
cost of CEO fully-vested stock grant
|
-
|
404
|
-
|
|||||||
Share-based
compensation cost
|
843
|
791
|
97
|
|||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Decrease
(increase) in accounts receivable, net
|
(1,919
|
)
|
(3,481
|
)
|
2,120
|
|||||
Decrease
(increase) in inventories
|
(845
|
)
|
2,813
|
13,262
|
||||||
Decrease
(increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
1,458
|
(526
|
)
|
3,679
|
||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,697
|
)
|
532
|
(14,271
|
)
|
|||||
Decrease
in income taxes payable
|
(2,081
|
)
|
(1,832
|
)
|
(649
|
)
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in other long-term liabilities
|
(177
|
)
|
652
|
(348
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
17,009
|
22,262
|
12,080
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(4,350
|
)
|
(4,179
|
)
|
(3,970
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of short-term investments
|
-
|
(10,653
|
)
|
(18,680
|
)
|
|||||
Sales
of short-term investments
|
-
|
21,383
|
7,950
|
|||||||
Capitalized
curriculum development costs
|
(4,010
|
)
|
(2,184
|
)
|
(961
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from disposal of unconsolidated subsidiary
|
-
|
500
|
-
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment, net
|
93
|
-
|
1,556
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
(8,267
|
)
|
4,867
|
(14,105
|
)
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale and financing of corporate campus (net of
restricted cash
of $699)
|
-
|
32,422
|
-
|
|||||||
Redemptions
of Series A preferred stock
|
(20,000
|
)
|
(30,000
|
)
|
- | |||||
Change
in restricted cash
|
699
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt and financing obligation
|
(1,111
|
)
|
(216
|
)
|
(102
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of common stock for treasury
|
(5,167
|
)
|
(91
|
)
|
(182
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sales of common stock from treasury
|
427
|
109
|
154
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from management stock loan payments
|
134
|
839
|
- | |||||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(4,885
|
)
|
(9,020
|
)
|
(8,735
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used for financing activities
|
(29,903
|
)
|
(5,957
|
)
|
(8,865
|
)
|
||||
Effect
of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash
equivalents
|
58
|
(656
|
)
|
148
|
||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(21,103
|
)
|
20,516
|
(10,742
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
|
51,690
|
31,174
|
41,916
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the year
|
$
|
30,587
|
$
|
51,690
|
$
|
31,174
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$
|
2,615
|
$
|
1,549
|
$
|
1,069
|
||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
2,662
|
606
|
277
|
|||||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
$
|
934
|
$
|
1,434
|
$
|
2,184
|
||||
Issuance
of unvested stock as deferred compensation
|
212
|
1,147
|
829
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
NATURE
OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Franklin
Covey Co. (hereafter referred to as us, we, our, or the Company) provides
integrated consulting, training, and performance enhancement solutions
to
organizations and individuals in strategy execution, productivity,
leadership,
sales force effectiveness, effective communications, and other areas.
Each
integrated solution may include components of training and consulting,
assessment, and other application tools that are generally available
in
electronic or paper-based formats. Our products and services are available
through professional consulting services, public workshops, retail
stores,
catalogs, and the Internet at www.franklincovey.com.
The
Company’s historically best-known offerings include the FranklinCovey Planner™,
and a suite of new and updated individual-effectiveness and
leadership-development training products based on the best-selling
book
The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People.
We also
offer a range of training and assessment products to help organizations
achieve
superior results by focusing and executing on top priorities, building
the
capability of knowledge workers, and aligning business processes. These
offerings include the popular workshop FOCUS:
Achieving Your Highest Priorities™,
The
4
Disciplines of Execution™,
The
4
Roles of Leadership™,
Building
Business Acumen: What the CEO Wants You to Know™,
the
Advantage Series communication workshops, and the Execution
Quotient
(xQ™)
organizational assessment tool.
Fiscal
Year
The
Company utilizes a modified 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on August
31 of
each year. Corresponding quarterly periods generally consist of 13-week
periods
that ended on November
26, 2005,
February
25, 2006,
and
May
27,
2006
during
fiscal 2006. Unless otherwise noted, references to fiscal years apply
to the 12
months ended August 31 of the specified year.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of the
Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions
are
eliminated in consolidation.
Pervasiveness
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make
estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of
the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during
the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements
to
conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications
included a
change in the classification of the gain on the sale of investment
in an
unconsolidated subsidiary from operating income to non-operating income
in the
fiscal 2005 consolidated income statement.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We
consider highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate
risk and
original maturities to the Company of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Our cash equivalents consisted primarily of commercial
paper and
money market funds that totaled $19.5
million
and $36.7
million
at August 31, 2006 and 2005. As of August 31, 2006, we had demand deposits
at
various banks in excess of the $100,000 limit for insurance by the
Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
Restricted
Cash
Our
restricted cash represents a portion of the proceeds from the fiscal
2005 sale
of our corporate campus (Note 2)
that
was held in escrow to repay the outstanding mortgage on one of the
buildings
that was sold. The mortgage was repaid in full during September
2005.
Short-Term
Investments
We
consider highly liquid investments with an effective maturity to the
Company of
more than three months and less than one year to be short-term investments.
We
define effective maturity as the shorter of the original maturity to
the Company
or the effective maturity as a result of the periodic auction of our
investments
classified as available for sale. We determine the appropriate classification
of
our investments at the time of purchase and reevaluate such designations
as of
each balance sheet date.
Realized
gains and losses on the sale of available for sale short-term investments
were
insignificant for the periods presented. Unrealized gains and losses
on
short-term investments were also insignificant for the periods presented.
We use
the specific identification method to compute the gains and losses
on our
short-term investments.
Trade
Accounts Receivable
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not
bear
interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate
of
the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts receivable
balance. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon
historical
write-off experience and current economic conditions and review the
adequacy of
the allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis. Receivable
balances past
due over 90 days, which exceed a specified dollar amount, are reviewed
individually for collectibility. Account balances are charged off against
the
allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the
potential
for recovery is considered remote. In addition, we do not have any
off-balance
sheet credit exposure related to our customers.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using
the
first-in, first-out method. Elements of cost in inventories generally
include
raw materials, direct labor, and overhead. Our inventories are comprised
primarily of dated calendar products and other non-dated products such
as
binders, stationery, training products, handheld electronic devices,
and other
accessories and were comprised of the following (in thousands):
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
18,464
|
$
|
18,161
|
|||
Work
in process
|
706
|
825
|
|||||
Raw
materials
|
2,620
|
1,989
|
|||||
$
|
21,790
|
$
|
20,975
|
Provision
is made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated
net
realizable value. At August 31, 2006 and 2005, our reserves for excess
and
obsolete inventories totaled $3.3
million
and $5.3
million.
In assessing the realization of inventories, we make judgments regarding
future
demand requirements and compare these estimates with current and committed
inventory levels. Inventory requirements may change based on projected
customer
demand, technological and product life cycle changes, longer- or
shorter-than-expected usage periods, and other factors that could affect
the
valuation of our inventories.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation, which includes the
amortization of assets recorded under capital lease obligations, is
calculated
using the straight-line method over the expected useful life of the
asset. The
Company generally uses the following depreciable lives for our major
classifications of property and equipment:
Description
|
Useful
Lives
|
|||
Buildings
|
15-39
years
|
|||
Machinery
and equipment
|
3-7
years
|
|||
Computer
hardware and software
|
3
years
|
|||
Furniture,
fixtures, and leasehold improvements
|
5-8
years
|
Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful economic life
of the
asset or the contracted lease period. We expense costs for repairs
and
maintenance as incurred. Gains and losses resulting from the sale of
property
and equipment are recorded in current operations.
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized,
but rather
are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events
or
circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey
trade name
intangible asset (Note 3)
has
been deemed to have an indefinite life. This intangible asset is assigned
to the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit and is tested for impairment
using the
present value of estimated royalties on trade name related revenues,
which
consist primarily of training seminars and work sessions, international
licensee
sales, and related products. No impairment charge to the Covey trade
name was
required during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, or
2004.
Capitalized
Curriculum Development Costs
During
the normal course of business, we develop training courses and related
materials
that we sell to our customers. Capitalized curriculum development costs
include
certain expenditures to develop course materials such as video segments,
course
manuals, and other related materials. Curriculum costs are only capitalized
when
a course is developed that will result in future benefits or when there is
a major revision to a course or significant re-write of the course
materials or
curriculum.
During
fiscal 2006, we capitalized certain costs associated with the development
of new
programs in leadership and goal alignment and execution. In fiscal
2005, we
completed major revisions to our well-known and successful The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People
training
course and capitalized costs associated with the refreshed course.
These
capitalized development costs are generally amortized over a five-year
life,
which is based on numerous factors, including expected cycles of major
changes
to curriculum. Capitalized curriculum development costs are reported
as a
component of our other long-term assets in our consolidated balance
sheet and
totaled $5.9
million
and $2.6
million
at August 31, 2006 and 2005. Capitalized curriculum development cost
amortization is reported as a component of cost of sales.
Restricted
Investments
The
Company’s restricted investments consist of insurance contracts and investments
in mutual funds that are held in a “rabbi trust” and are restricted for payment
to the participants of our deferred compensation plan (Note 14).
We
account for our restricted investments in accordance with Statement
of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
As
required by SFAS No. 115, the Company determines the proper classification
of
its investments at the time of purchase and reassesses such designations
at each
balance sheet date. At August 31, 2006 and 2005, our restricted investments
were
classified as trading securities and consisted of insurance contracts
and mutual
funds. The fair value of these restricted investments totaled $1.2
million
at August 31, 2006 and 2005, and were recorded as components of other
long-term
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 115, our unrealized losses on restricted investments,
which were immaterial during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, were
recognized
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as a component
of
selling, general, and administrative expense.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for
possible
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate
of
undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over the remaining
useful lives
in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is recoverable.
If the
carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows
of the
assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between
the
carrying values of the assets and their estimated fair values. Impairment
of
long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there
are
identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets.
The
evaluation of long-lived assets requires us to use estimates of future
cash
flows. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability
of our
long-lived tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in
the future,
significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect
our
results of operations and financial condition.
Accrued
Liabilities
Significant
components of our accrued liabilities were as follows (in
thousands):
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation
|
$
|
7,457
|
$
|
8,069
|
|||
Unearned
revenue
|
5,275
|
4,541
|
|||||
Outsourcing
contract costs payable
|
4,111
|
4,211
|
|||||
Customer
credits
|
2,632
|
2,701
|
|||||
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
934
|
1,434
|
|||||
Other
accrued liabilities
|
11,761
|
15,580
|
|||||
$
|
32,170
|
$
|
36,536
|
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
The
functional currencies of the Company's foreign operations are the local
currencies. Translation adjustments result from translating the Company’s
foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements into United States dollars. The
balance sheet accounts of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into
U.S.
dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date.
Revenues
and expenses are translated using average exchange rates during the
fiscal year.
The resulting translation gains or losses were recorded as a component
of
accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Transaction
losses totaled $0.1
million,
$0.3
million,
and $0.2
million,
during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and were reported
as a
component of selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Derivative
Instruments
Derivative
instruments are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
as
modified by SFAS No. 138, Accounting
for Certain Derivative and Certain Hedging Activities,
and
SFAS No. 149, Amendment
of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.
During
the normal course of business, we are exposed to risks associated with
foreign
currency exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations. Foreign currency
exchange
rate exposures result from the Company’s operating results, assets, and
liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the United
States
dollar. In order to limit our exposure to these elements, we have made limited
use of derivative instruments. Each derivative instrument is recorded
in the
balance sheet at its fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in accumulated
other
comprehensive income (a component of shareholders’ equity). Changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedge instruments
are
immediately recognized as a component of selling, general, and administrative
expense in our consolidated income statements.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists,
2)
delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered, 3)
the price to
the customer is fixed and determinable, and 4) collectibility is reasonably
assured. For product sales, these conditions are generally met upon
shipment of
the product to the customer or by completion of the sales transaction
in a
retail store. For training and service sales, these conditions are
generally met
upon presentation of the training seminar or delivery of the consulting
services.
Some
of
our training and consulting contracts contain multiple deliverable
elements that
include training along with other products and services. In accordance
with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Accounting
for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,
sales
arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units
of
accounting if the deliverables in the sales contract meet the following
criteria: 1) the delivered training or product has value to the client
on a
standalone basis; 2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the
fair value
of undelivered items; and 3) delivery of any undelivered item is probable.
The
overall contract consideration is allocated among the separate units
of
accounting based upon their fair values. If the fair value of all undelivered
elements exists, but fair value does not exist for one or more delivered
elements, the residual method is used. Under the residual method, the
amount of
consideration allocated to the delivered items equals the total contract
consideration less the aggregate fair value of the undelivered items.
Fair value
of the undelivered items is based upon the normal pricing practices
for our
existing training programs, consulting services, and other products,
which are
generally the prices of the items when sold separately.
Revenue
is recognized on software sales in accordance with Statement of Position
(SOP)
97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition
as
amended by SOP 98-09. Statement 97-2, as amended, generally requires
revenue
earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements such as
software
products and support to be allocated to each element based on the relative
fair
value of the elements based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE).
The
majority of the Company’s software sales have multiple elements, including a
license and post contract customer support (PCS). Currently we do not
have VSOE
for either the license or support elements of our software sales. Accordingly,
revenue is deferred until the only undelivered element is PCS and the
total
arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the support period. During
fiscal
2006, 2005, and 2004, we had software sales totaling $3.3
million,
$4.6
million,
and $4.7
million,
which are included in product sales in our consolidated income
statements.
Our
international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where
we do
not have a directly-owned operation. Licensee companies are unrelated
entities
that have been granted a license to translate the Company’s content and
curriculum, adapt the content and curriculum to the local culture,
and sell the
Company’s training seminars and products in a specific country or region.
Licensees are required to pay us royalties based upon a percentage
of the
licensee’s sales. The Company recognizes royalty income each period based upon
the sales information reported to the Company from the licensee. Licensee
royalty revenues totaled $6.1
million,
$5.2
million,
and $4.3
million
for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Revenue
is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated
amounts
for discounts and product returns.
Share-Based
Compensation
On
September 1, 2005 we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised
2004)
Share
Based Payment (SFAS
No.
123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation.
Generally, this new statement follows the approach previously defined
in SFAS
No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R requires all share based-payments to
employees,
including grants of stock options and the compensatory elements of
employee
stock purchase plans, to be recognized in the income statement based
upon their
fair values.
We
previously accounted for our stock-based compensation using the intrinsic
method
as defined in APB Opinion No. 25 and accordingly, we have not recognized
any
expense for our stock option plans or employee stock purchase plan
in our
consolidated financial statements for fiscal years prior to the adoption
of SFAS
No. 123R. We adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition
method. Under this method, share-based awards that are granted, modified,
or
settled after the date of adoption are measured and accounted for in
accordance
with Statement No. 123R and prior period financial results are not
retroactively
adjusted. The accounting treatment for unvested share awards remains
essentially
unchanged. The following table presents the pro forma stock-based compensation
amounts that would have been included in our income statements for
fiscal 2005
and 2004 had stock-based compensation expense been determined in accordance
with
the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123 (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders, as reported
|
$
|
(5,837
|
)
|
$
|
(18,885
|
)
|
|
Add:
Share-based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of
related tax effects
|
791
|
97
|
|||||
Deduct:
Stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair
value based
method for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
(3,019
|
)
|
(871
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders, pro forma
|
$
|
(8,065
|
)
|
$
|
(19,659
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share, as reported
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share, pro forma
|
$
|
(.46
|
)
|
$
|
(1.00
|
)
|
In
connection with changes to our Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) compensation
(Note 19),
we
accelerated the vesting on the CEO’s 1.6 million stock options with an exercise
price of $14.00 per share during fiscal 2005. The accelerated vesting
of these
options increased the fair value of stock-based compensation as shown
in the
table above by $1.9
million
during fiscal 2005.
For
more
information on our stock-based compensation plans, refer to Note 11.
Shipping
and Handling Fees and Costs
All
shipping and handling fees billed to customers are recorded as a component
of
net sales. All costs incurred related to the shipping and handling
of products
are recorded in cost of sales.
Advertising
Costs
Costs
for
newspaper, television, radio, and other advertising are expensed as
incurred or
recognized over the period of expected benefit for direct response
and catalog
advertising. Direct response advertising costs, which consist primarily
of
printing and mailing costs for catalogs and seminar mailers, are charged
to
expense over the period of projected benefit, which ranges from three
to 12
months. Advertising costs included in selling, general, and administrative
expenses totaled $16.0
million,
$16.2
million,
and $14.0
million
for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Our direct
response
advertising costs reported in other current assets totaled $2.5
million
and $3.2
million
at August 31, 2006 and 2005.
Research
and Development Costs
We
expense research and development costs as incurred. During fiscal years
2006,
2005, and 2004, we expensed $2.3
million,
$2.2
million,
and $3.6
million
of research and development costs that were recorded as components
of cost of
sales and selling, general, and administrative expenses in our consolidated
income statements.
Income
Taxes
Our
income tax provision has been determined using the asset and liability
approach
of accounting for income taxes. Under this approach, deferred income
taxes
represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid. The income
tax
provision represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year
plus the
change in deferred taxes during the year. Deferred income taxes result
from
differences between the financial and tax bases of our assets and liabilities
and are adjusted for tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted.
A
valuation allowance is provided against deferred income tax assets
when it is
more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred income
tax assets
will not be realized.
The
Company provides for income taxes, net of applicable foreign tax credits,
on
temporary differences in our investment in foreign subsidiaries, which
consist
primarily of unrepatriated earnings.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income (loss) includes changes to equity accounts that were not the
result of
transactions with shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised
of net
income or loss and other comprehensive income and loss items. Our comprehensive
income and losses generally consist of changes in the fair value of
derivative
instruments and changes in the cumulative foreign currency translation
adjustment.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Error
Corrections - In
May
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20
and FASB
Statement No. 3.
Statement No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and
reporting
of a change in accounting principle and applies to all voluntary changes
in
accounting principle. This statement requires retrospective application
to prior
periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it
is
impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the
cumulative
effect of an accounting change. Further, SFAS No. 154 requires that
the new
accounting principle be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities
as of
the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application
is
practicable and that a corresponding adjustment be made to the opening
balance
of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of shareholders’ equity)
for the period that is being reported in an income statement. This
statement
also carries forward, without change, the guidance in APB Opinion No.
20 for
reporting the correction of an error in previously issued financial
statements
and a change in accounting estimate. Statement No. 154 is effective
for
accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005 and will thus be effective for our fiscal year
beginning
September 1, 2006.
Sales
Tax Presentation
- In
June 2006, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-03, How
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities
Should
Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net
Presentation).
This
consensus provides that the presentation of taxes assessed by a governmental
authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction
between a
seller and a customer on either a gross basis (included in revenues
and costs)
or on a net basis (excluded from revenues) is an accounting policy
decision that
should be disclosed. The provisions of EITF 06-03 become effective
for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting EITF 06-03 on the presentation
of
our consolidated financial statements.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
- In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No.
109.
This
interpretation prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement
standard, as well as criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing,
and
measuring tax positions for financial statement purposes. This interpretation
also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainties
as they
relate to income tax accounting and is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN
No. 48 no
later than September 1, 2007 (fiscal 2008). We are currently in the
process of
evaluating the impact of FIN No. 48 on our financial statements. The
cumulative
effect from the adoption of FIN No. 48, if any, will be an adjustment
to
beginning retained earnings in the year of adoption.
Evaluation
of Misstatements - In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released
Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements
in
Current Year Financial Statements,
which
provides the Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial
statement misstatements, such as assessing both the carryover and reversing
effects of prior year misstatements on the current year financial statements.
The evaluation requirements of SAB No. 108 are effective for years
ending after
November 15, 2006. We have not yet determined the impact of adopting
the
provisions of SAB No. 108.
Fair
Value Measures - In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measures.
This
statement establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value,
sets out
a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures
about
fair-value measurements. Statement No. 157 only applies to fair-value
measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards except for measurements of share-based payments and measurements
that
are similar to, but not intended to be, fair value. This statement
is effective
for the specified fair value measures for financial statements issued
for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will thus be effective
for the
Company in fiscal 2008. We have not yet completed our analysis of the
impact of
SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements.
2.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Our
property and equipment were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Land
and improvements
|
$
|
1,869
|
$
|
1,848
|
|||
Buildings
|
35,063
|
34,763
|
|||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
31,709
|
31,660
|
|||||
Computer
hardware and software
|
42,532
|
61,820
|
|||||
Furniture,
fixtures, and leasehold improvements
|
32,831
|
43,798
|
|||||
144,004
|
173,889
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(110,686
|
)
|
(138,612
|
)
|
|||
$
|
33,318
|
$
|
35,277
|
In
August
2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations
to improve
our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our
printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing service
sales. Our reconfiguration plan includes moving our printing operation
a short
distance from its existing location to our corporate headquarters campus
and the
sale of certain printing presses. Other existing presses will be moved
to the
new location as part of the reconfiguration plan. Because the manufacturing
facility and printing presses were not available for immediate sale
as defined
by SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
these
assets were not classified as held for sale in our consolidated balance
sheet.
The carrying value of the manufacturing facility and printing presses
that are
to be sold under the reconfiguration plan totaled $1.9
million
at August 31, 2006 and are included in our Consumer Solutions Business
Unit
assets. We do not expect to recognize a loss from the sale of these
assets.
On
June
21, 2005 we completed the sale and leaseback of our corporate headquarters
facility, located in Salt Lake City, Utah. The sale price was $33.8
million
in cash and after deducting customary closing costs, including commissions
and
an amount held in escrow for payment of the remaining mortgage on one
of the
buildings, we received net proceeds totaling $32.4
million.
In connection with the transaction, we entered into a 20-year master
lease
agreement with the purchaser, an unrelated private investment group.
Although
the corporate headquarters facility was sold and the Company has no
legal
ownership of the property, SFAS No. 98, Accounting
for Leases,
precluded us from recording the transaction as a sale since we have
subleased
more than a minor portion of the property. Pursuant to this accounting
guidance,
we have accounted for the sale as a financing transaction, which required
us to
continue reporting the corporate headquarters facility as an asset
and to
depreciate the property over the life of the master lease agreement.
We also
recorded a financing obligation to the purchaser (Note 4)
for the
sale price. At August 31, 2006, the carrying value of the corporate
headquarters
facility was $22.1
million.
The master lease agreement also contains six five-year renewal options,
which
allows us to maintain our operations at the current location for up
to 50
years.
As
a
result of projected negative cash flows at certain retail stores, we
recorded
impairment charges totaling $0.2
million
and $0.3
million
during fiscal 2005 and 2004 to reduce the carrying values of the stores’
long-lived assets to their estimated fair values. These impairment
charges were
related to assets that are to be held and used by the Company and were
included
as a component of depreciation expense in our consolidated income statements.
We
were not required to record any impairment charges on our property
and equipment
during fiscal 2006.
Certain
land and buildings are collateral for mortgage debt obligations (Note
4).
3.
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
Our
intangible assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):
AUGUST
31, 2006
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Net
Carrying Amount
|
|||||||
Definite-lived
intangible assets:
|
||||||||||
License
rights
|
$
|
27,000
|
$
|
(7,417
|
)
|
$
|
19,583
|
|||
Curriculum
|
58,229
|
(26,826
|
)
|
31,403
|
||||||
Customer
lists
|
18,774
|
(13,228
|
)
|
5,546
|
||||||
Trade
names
|
1,277
|
(1,277
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
105,280
|
(48,748
|
)
|
56,532
|
|||||||
Indefinite-lived
intangible asset:
|
||||||||||
Covey
trade name
|
23,000
|
-
|
23,000
|
|||||||
$
|
128,280
|
$
|
(48,748
|
)
|
$
|
79,532
|
||||
AUGUST
31, 2005
|
||||||||||
Definite-lived
intangible assets:
|
||||||||||
License
rights
|
$
|
27,000
|
$
|
(6,480
|
)
|
$
|
20,520
|
|||
Curriculum
|
58,232
|
(25,146
|
)
|
33,086
|
||||||
Customer
lists
|
18,774
|
(12,032
|
)
|
6,742
|
||||||
Trade
names
|
1,277
|
(1,277
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
105,283
|
(44,935
|
)
|
60,348
|
|||||||
Indefinite-lived
intangible asset:
|
||||||||||
Covey
trade name
|
23,000
|
-
|
23,000
|
|||||||
$
|
128,283
|
$
|
(44,935
|
)
|
$
|
83,348
|
Our
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful life of the asset. The range of remaining estimated useful lives
and
weighted-average amortization period over which we are amortizing the major
categories of definite-lived intangible assets at August 31, 2006 were
as
follows:
Category
of Intangible Asset
|
Range
of Remaining Estimated Useful Lives
|
Weighted
Average Amortization Period
|
||
License
rights
|
20
years
|
30
years
|
||
Curriculum
|
13
to 20 years
|
26
years
|
||
Customer
lists
|
5
years
|
13
years
|
Our
aggregate amortization expense from definite-lived intangible assets
totaled
$3.8
million,
$4.2
million,
and $4.2
million,
for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Amortization
expense
for our intangible assets over the next five years is expected to be
as follows
(in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
3,613
|
||
2008
|
3,613
|
|||
2009
|
3,613
|
|||
2010
|
3,613
|
|||
2011
|
3,471
|
4.
|
LONG
TERM DEBT AND FINANCING
OBLIGATION
|
Our
long-term debt and financing obligation were comprised of the following
(in
thousands):
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Financing
obligation on corporate campus, payable in monthly installments
of $254
for the first five years with two percent annual increases
thereafter
(imputed interest at 7.7%), through June 2025
|
$
|
33,291
|
$
|
33,739
|
|||
Mortgage
payable in monthly installments of $9 CDN ($8 USD at August
31, 2006),
plus interest at CDN prime plus 1% (7.0% at August 31, 2006)
through
January 2015, secured by real estate
|
853
|
$
|
889
|
||||
Mortgage
payable in monthly installments of $8 including interest
at 9.9%, secured
by real estate, and paid in full in September 2005
|
-
|
546
|
|||||
34,144
|
35,174
|
||||||
Less
current portion
|
(585
|
)
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|||
Total
long-term debt and financing obligation, less current
portion
|
$
|
33,559
|
$
|
34,086
|
The
mortgage loan on our Canadian facility requires the Company to maintain
certain
financial ratios at our directly owned Canadian operation.
On
June
21, 2005, we completed the sale and leaseback of our corporate headquarters
facility, located in Salt Lake City, Utah. The sale price was $33.8
million
in cash and after deducting customary closing costs, we received net
proceeds
totaling $32.4
million.
In connection with the transaction, we entered into a 20-year master
lease
agreement with the purchaser, an unrelated private investment group.
Although
the corporate headquarters facility was sold and the Company has no
legal
ownership of the property, SFAS No. 98, Accounting
for Leases,
precluded us from recording the transaction as a sale since we have
subleased a
significant portion of the property that was sold. Accordingly, we
have
accounted for the sale as a financing transaction, which required us
to continue
reporting the corporate headquarters facility as an asset (Note 2)
and to
record a financing obligation for the sale price. The future minimum
payments
under the financing obligation for the initial 20 year lease term are
as follows
(in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
3,045
|
||
2008
|
3,045
|
|||
2009
|
3,045
|
|||
2010
|
3,055
|
|||
2011
|
3,115
|
|||
Thereafter
|
49,957
|
|||
Total
future minimum financing obligation payments
|
65,262
|
|||
Less
interest
|
(33,283
|
)
|
||
Present
value of future minimum financing obligation payments
|
$
|
31,979
|
The
difference between the carrying value of the financing obligation and
the
present value of the future minimum financing obligation payments represents
the
carrying value of the land sold in the financing transaction, which
is not
depreciated. At the conclusion of the master lease agreement, the remaining
financing obligation and carrying value of the land will be written
off the
Company’s financial statements. The master lease agreement also contains six
five-year renewal options that allow us to maintain our operations
at the
current location for up to 50 years.
Future
principal maturities of our long-term debt and financing obligation
were as
follows at August 31, 2006 (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
585
|
||
2008
|
624
|
|||
2009
|
667
|
|||
2010
|
722
|
|||
2011
|
835
|
|||
Thereafter
|
30,711
|
|||
$
|
34,144
|
In
September 2005, we used a portion of the proceeds from the sale of
our corporate
headquarters to repay the mortgage, including a prepayment penalty
totaling
$0.1
million,
on one of the buildings sold. The proceeds from the sale of the corporate
headquarters facility that were used to repay the mortgage were reported
as
restricted cash on our August 31, 2005 consolidated balance sheet.
5.
|
LEASE
OBLIGATIONS
|
Lease
Expense
In
the
normal course of business, we lease office space, retail store locations,
and
warehouse and distribution facilities under non-cancelable operating
lease
agreements. We rent office space, primarily for international and domestic
regional sales administration offices, in commercial office complexes
that are
conducive to sales and administrative operations. The majority of our
retail
stores are leased in locations that generally have significant consumer
traffic,
such as shopping malls and other commercial districts. We also rent
warehousing
and distribution facilities at certain international locations that
are designed
to provide secure storage and efficient distribution of our products
to areas
outside of the United States. These operating lease agreements generally
contain
renewal options that may be exercised at our discretion after the completion
of
the base rental term. In addition, many of the rental agreements provide
for
regular increases to the base rental rate at specified intervals, which
usually
occur on an annual basis. At August 31, 2006, we had operating leases
that have
remaining terms of one to 10
years.
The following table summarizes our future minimum lease payments under
operating
lease agreements at August 31, 2006 (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
8,475
|
||
2008
|
7,228
|
|||
2009
|
5,564
|
|||
2010
|
4,012
|
|||
2011
|
2,402
|
|||
Thereafter
|
6,013
|
|||
$
|
33,694
|
We
recognize lease expense on a straight-line basis over the life of the
lease
agreement. Contingent rent expense is recognized as it is incurred.
Total rent
expense recorded in selling, general, and administrative expense from
operating
lease agreements was $11.2
million,
$13.5
million,
and $15.3
million
for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004. Additionally, certain retail
store leases
contain terms that require additional, or contingent, rental payments
based upon
the realization of certain sales thresholds. Our contingent rental
payments
under these arrangements were insignificant
during
the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
During
fiscal 2005,
we
completed the sale of our corporate headquarters facility, located
in Salt Lake
City, Utah. In connection with the transaction, we entered into a 20-year
master
lease agreement with the purchaser, an unrelated private investment
group, which
also contains six five-year renewal options. Although the corporate
headquarters
facility was sold and the Company has no legal ownership of the property,
SFAS
No. 98, Accounting
for Leases,
precluded us from recording the transaction as a sale and a lease since
we have
subleased more than a minor portion of the property. Accordingly, we
have
accounted for the sale as a financing transaction which required us
to continue
reporting the corporate headquarters facility as an asset and to continue
depreciating the property (Note 2).
We
also recorded a liability to the purchaser (Note 4)
for the
sale price.
Lease
Income
During
fiscal 2006 and in previous fiscal years, we have subleased a significant
portion of our corporate headquarters office space located in Salt
Lake City,
Utah to multiple, unrelated tenants. The cost basis of the office space
available for lease was $23.4
million
and had a carrying value of $15.7
million
at August 31, 2006. We also have sublease agreements on two retail
store
locations that we have exited, but still have a remaining lease obligation
(Note
15).
Future
minimum lease payments due to us from these sublease agreements at
August 31,
2006, are as follows (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
2,298
|
||
2008
|
2,293
|
|||
2009
|
2,289
|
|||
2010
|
1,388
|
|||
2011
|
744
|
|||
Thereafter
|
1,411
|
|||
$
|
10,423
|
Total
sublease payments made to the Company totaled $2.0
million,
$1.9
million,
and $2.4
million,
in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 of which $0.3
million,
$0.8
million
and $2.3
million
was recorded as a reduction of rent expense associated with underlying
lease
agreements in our selling, general, and administrative expense in fiscal
2006,
2005, and 2004. The remaining sublease income was attributable to leases
at our
corporate headquarters and was reported as a component of product sales
in our
consolidated income statements.
6.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
EDS
Outsourcing Contract
The
Company has an outsourcing contract with Electronic Data Systems (EDS)
to
provide warehousing, distribution, information systems, and call center
operations. Under terms of the outsourcing contract and its addendums,
EDS
operates our primary call center, provides warehousing and distribution
services, and supports our software products and various information
systems.
The outsourcing contract and its addendums expire on June 30, 2016
and have
remaining required minimum payments totaling approximately $153.2
million,
which are payable over the life of the contract. During fiscal 2006,
we amended
the terms of the outsourcing agreement with EDS. One of the key provisions
of
this amendment is reduced required minimum annual payments for information
systems support. Although we may pay more than the minimum required
payments due
to actual usage and other factors, the contractually required minimum
annual
payments were reduced by a total of $84.2 million over the life of
the
outsourcing agreement. During fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, we expensed
$30.6
million,
$30.4
million,
and $33.8
million
for services provided under terms of the EDS outsourcing contract.
The total
amount expensed each year under the EDS contract includes freight charges,
which
are billed to the Company based upon activity, that totaled $9.8
million,
$9.6
million,
and $9.6
million,
during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The following
schedule
summarizes our required minimum payments to EDS for services over the
life of
the outsourcing contract and its addendums (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
17,217
|
||
2008
|
15,901
|
|||
2009
|
15,927
|
|||
2010
|
15,577
|
|||
2011
|
15,298
|
|||
Thereafter
|
73,233
|
|||
$
|
153,153
|
Actual
expenses resulting from the outsourcing contracts may exceed required
minimum
payments if actual services provided under the contracts exceed specified
minimum levels.
Under
terms of the outsourcing agreement with EDS, we are contractually obligated
to
purchase the necessary computer hardware to keep such property and
equipment up
to certain specifications. Amounts shown below are estimated required
capital
purchases of computer hardware under terms of the EDS outsourcing agreement
and
its amendments (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
535
|
||
2008
|
483
|
|||
2009
|
556
|
|||
2010
|
587
|
|||
2011
|
525
|
|||
Thereafter
|
3,192
|
|||
$
|
5,878
|
In
addition to the minimum required outsourcing contract payments that
were due in
fiscal 2004, we paid an additional $11.6
million
related to invoices outstanding for the period from December 2002 through
May
2003. These payments had been postponed until certain software system
implementation issues were resolved. Under terms of the revised payment
schedule, we paid EDS interest at the monthly prime rate as quoted
in the Wall
Street Journal plus one percent on the outstanding balance of these
invoices.
The
outsourcing contracts contain early termination provisions that the
Company may
exercise under certain conditions. However, in order to exercise the
early
termination provisions, we would have to pay specified penalties to
EDS
depending upon the circumstances of the contract termination.
Purchase
Commitments
During
the normal course of business, we issue purchase orders to various
external
vendors for products (inventory) to be delivered at times that coincide
with our
seasonally busy months of November, December, and January. At August
31, 2006,
we had purchase commitments totaling $10.5
million
for inventory items to be delivered in fiscal 2007. Other purchase
commitments
for materials, supplies, and other items incident to the ordinary conduct
of
business were immaterial, both individually and in aggregate, to the
Company’s
operations at August 31, 2006.
Printing
Equipment Purchases
In
August
2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations
to improve
our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our
printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing services
sales. In connection with this reconfiguration plan, we have signed
contracts to
purchase additional printing equipment for $3.1
million.
The payments are due at specified times during fiscal 2007 that generally
coincide with the installation and successful operation of the new
equipment.
Legal
Matters
During
fiscal 2002, we received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange
Commission
(SEC) seeking documents and information relating to our management
stock loan
program and previously announced, and withdrawn, tender offer. We provided
the
documents and information requested by the SEC, including the testimonies
of our
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other key employees.
During fiscal 2006, we received notification from the SEC that the
investigation
was terminated without a recommendation for enforcement action.
In
August
2005, EpicRealm Licensing (EpicRealm) filed an action against the Company
for
patent infringement. The action alleges that FranklinCovey infringed
upon two of
EpicRealm’s patents directed to managing dynamic web page requests from clients
to a web server that in turn uses a page server to generate a dynamic
web page
from content retrieved from a data source. The Company denies the patent
infringement and believes that the EpicRealm claims are invalid. This
litigation
is currently in the discovery phase and the Company intends to vigorously
defend
this matter.
The
Company is also the subject of certain legal actions, which we consider
routine
to our business activities. At August 31, 2006, we believe that, after
consultation with legal counsel, any potential liability to the Company
under
such actions will not materially affect our financial position, liquidity,
or
results of operations.
7.
|
PREFERRED
STOCK RECAPITALIZATION
|
Overview
On
March
4, 2005, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders approved
a plan
to recapitalize the Company’s preferred stock. Under terms of the
recapitalization plan, we completed a one-to-four forward split of
the existing
Series A preferred stock and then bifurcated each share of Series A
preferred
stock into a new share of Series A preferred stock that is no longer
convertible
into common stock, and a warrant to purchase shares of common stock.
The new
Series A preferred stock retains its common-equivalent voting rights
and will
automatically convert to shares of Series B preferred stock if the
holder of the
original Series A preferred stock sells, or transfers, the preferred
stock to
another party. Series B preferred stock does not have common-equivalent
voting
rights, but retains substantially all other characteristics of the
new Series A
preferred stock.
Each
previously existing Series A preferred shareholder received a warrant
to
purchase a number of common shares equal to 71.43 shares for each $1,000
($14
per share) in aggregate liquidation value of Series A preferred shares
held
immediately prior to the recapitalization transaction. The exercise
price of
each warrant is $8.00 per share (subject to customary anti-dilution
and exercise
features) and the warrants will be exercisable over an eight-year
term.
The
preferred stock recapitalization transaction enables the Company
to:
·
|
Have
the conditional right to redeem shares of preferred stock;
|
|
·
|
Place
a limit on the period in which we may be required to issue
common stock.
The new warrants to purchase shares of common stock expire
in eight years,
compared to the perpetual right of previously existing Series
A preferred
stock to convert to shares of common stock;
|
|
·
|
Increase
our ability to purchase shares of our common stock. Previous
purchases of
common stock were limited and potentially subject to the
approval of
Series A preferred shareholders;
|
|
·
|
Create
the possibility that we may receive cash upon issuing additional
shares of
common stock to Series A preferred shareholders. The warrants
have an
exercise price of $8.00 per share compared to the previously
existing
right of Series A preferred shareholders to convert their
preferred shares
into common shares without paying cash; and
|
|
·
|
Eliminate
the requirement to pay common stock dividends to preferred
shareholders on
an “as converted” basis.
|
New
Preferred Stock Rights
Upon
completion of the recapitalization transaction, Series A preferred
rights were
amended to prevent the conversion of Series A preferred stock to shares
of
common stock. Series B preferred stock rights were amended to be substantially
equivalent to Series A rights, except for the eliminated voting rights.
The
rights of the new Series A and Series B preferred stock include the
following:
·
|
Liquidation
Preference
-
Both Series A and Series B preferred stock have a liquidation
preference
of $25.00 per share plus accrued unpaid dividends, which
will be paid in
preference to the liquidation rights of all other equity
classes.
|
|
·
|
Conversion
-
Neither Series A nor Series B preferred stock is convertible
to shares of
common stock. Series A preferred stock converts into shares
of Series B
upon the sale or transfer of the Series A shares. Series
B preferred stock
does not have any conversion rights.
|
|
·
|
Dividends
-
Both Series A and Series B preferred stock accrue dividends
at 10.0
percent, payable quarterly, in preference to dividends on
all other equity
classes. If dividends are in arrears for six or more quarters,
the number
of the Company’s Board of Directors will be increased by two and the
Series A and Series B preferred shareholders will have the
ability to
select these additional directors. Series A and Series B
preferred stock
may not participate in dividends paid to common stockholders.
|
|
·
|
Redemption-
Under the original recapitalization agreements, we were only
permitted to
redeem any of the Series A or Series B preferred shares during
the first
year following the recapitalization at a price per share
equal to 100
percent of the liquidation preference. Subsequent to the
first anniversary
of the recapitalization and before the fifth anniversary
of the
transaction, we were allowed to purchase preferred shares
(up to $30.0
million in aggregate) only from Knowledge Capital, which
holds the
majority of our preferred stock, at a premium that increases
one
percentage point annually. After the sixth anniversary of
the
recapitalization, we may redeem any shares of preferred stock
at 101
percent of the liquidation preference on the date of
redemption.
At
our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in January 2006,
we obtained
shareholder approval of an amendment to our articles of incorporation
that
extends the period during which we have the right to redeem
outstanding
shares of preferred stock at 100 percent of its liquidation
preference.
The amendment extended the original redemption deadline from
March 8, 2006
to December 31, 2006 and also provides the right to extend
the redemption
period for an additional year to December 31, 2007, if another
$10.0
million of preferred stock is redeemed before December 31,
2006. On
February 13, 2006 we redeemed $10.0 million of preferred
stock, which
satisfied the additional extension provision and the Company
can redeem
preferred stock at the liquidation preference through December
31, 2007.
If any shares remain outstanding subsequent to December 31,
2007, we must
wait until after the sixth anniversary of the recapitalization
to redeem
shares of preferred stock as described above.
|
|
·
|
Change
in Control
-
In the event of any change in control of the Company, Knowledge
Capital,
to the extent that it still holds shares of Series A preferred
stock, will
have the option to receive a cash payment equal to 101 percent
of the
liquidation preference of its Series A preferred shares then
held. The
remaining Series A and Series B preferred shareholders have
no such
option.
|
|
·
|
Voting
Rights
-
Although the new Series A preferred shareholders will not
have conversion
rights, they will still be entitled to voting rights. The
holder of each
new share of Series A preferred stock will be entitled to
the voting
rights they would have if they held two shares of common
stock. The
cumulative number of votes will be based upon the number
of votes
attributable to shares of Series A held immediately prior
to the
recapitalization transaction less any transfers of Series
A shares to
Series B shares or redemptions. In the event that a Series
A preferred
shareholder exercises a warrant to purchase the Company’s common stock,
their Series A voting rights will be reduced by the number
of the common
shares issued upon exercise of the warrant. This feature
will prevent the
holders of Series A preferred stock from increasing their
voting influence
through the acquisition of additional shares of common stock
from the
exercise of the warrants.
|
|
·
|
Registration
Rights
-
We were required to use our best efforts to register the
resale of all
shares of common stock and shares of Series B preferred stock
issuable
upon the transfer and conversion of the Series A preferred
stock held by
Knowledge Capital and certain permitted transferees of Knowledge
Capital
within 240 days following the initial filing of the registration
statement
covering such shares. The initial filing of the registration
statement was
required to occur within 120 days following the closing of
the
recapitalization transaction. However, we obtained an extension
on this
filing from Knowledge Capital and the registration statement
was filed and
became effective in September 2005.
|
Accounting
for the Recapitalization
In
order
to account for the various aspects of the preferred stock recapitalization
transaction, we considered guidance found in SFAS No. 150, Accounting
for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liability
and
Equity,
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 00-19, Accounting
for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled
in, a
Company’s Own Stock,
EITF
Issue D-98 Classification
and Measurement of Redeemable Securities,
and EITF
Issue D-42, The
Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption
or Induced
Conversion of Preferred Stock.
Based
upon the relevant guidance found in these pronouncements, we accounted
for the
various aspects of the preferred stock recapitalization as follows:
New
Series A and Series B Preferred Stock
- The
new shares of preferred stock will continue to be classified as a component
of
shareholders’ equity since its conversion into cash or common stock is solely
within the Company’s control as there are no provisions in the recapitalization
documents that would obligate us to redeem shares of the Series A or
Series B
preferred stock. In addition, by virtue of the Utah Control Shares
Act, the
Company’s Bylaws, and the special voting rights of the preferred shareholders,
there are no circumstances under which a third party could acquire
controlling
voting power of the Company’s stock without consent of our Board of Directors
and thus trigger our obligation to redeem the new preferred stock.
Due to the
significant modifications to existing shares of Series A and Series
B preferred
stock, we believe that the previously outstanding preferred stock was
replaced
with new classes of preferred stock and common stock warrants. As a
result, the
new preferred stock was recorded at its fair value on the date of modification.
Consistent with other equity instruments, the carrying value of the
new
preferred stock will not be subsequently adjusted to its fair market
value at
the end of any reporting period.
We
engaged an independent valuation firm to determine the fair value of
the newly
issued shares of preferred stock prior to the March 8, 2005 recapitalization
closing date. The fair value of the new preferred stock under this
valuation was
preliminarily determined to be $20.77 per share, or $4.23 per share
less than
the preferred stock’s liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. Based upon
this valuation, we would have recorded a recapitalization gain of approximately
$7.7 million during the quarter in which the recapitalization transaction
was
completed and also would have recorded losses in future periods for
preferred
stock redemptions made at the liquidation preference.
Subsequent
to this valuation, we completed the sale of our corporate headquarters
facility
and redeemed $30.0 million, or 1.2 million shares, of Series A preferred
stock
at its liquidation preference and were considering additional redemptions
of
preferred stock at the liquidation preference. Based upon these considerations
and other factors, including the improvements in our operating results,
we
determined that the liquidation preference ($25.00 per share) is more
indicative
of the fair value of the preferred stock at the date of the recapitalization
transaction. Accordingly, we recorded a $7.8 million loss from the
recapitalization transaction since the aggregate fair value of the
new shares of
preferred stock and warrants (see warrant discussion below) exceeded
the
carrying value of the old preferred stock.
Warrants
- EITF
Issue 00-19 states that warrants should be classified as a component
of
shareholders’ equity if 1) the warrant contract requires physical settlement or
net-share settlement or 2) the warrant contract gives the Company a
choice of
net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares. We determined
that the
warrants should be accounted for as equity instruments because they
meet these
requirements.
Accordingly,
we recorded the warrants at their fair value, as determined using a
Black-Scholes valuation model on the date of the transaction, as a
component of
shareholders’ equity. Subsequent changes in fair value will not be recorded in
our financial statements as long as the warrants remain classified
as
shareholders’ equity in accordance with EITF Issue 00-19. At the date of the
recapitalization transaction, the warrants had a fair value of $1.22
per share,
or approximately $7.6 million in total. We issued 6.2 million common
stock
warrants in connection with the recapitalization transaction.
Derivatives
- The
modified preferred stock agreement contains a feature that allows us
to redeem
preferred stock at its liquidation preference in the first year following
the
recapitalization transaction and at 101 percent of the liquidation
preference
after the sixth anniversary of the recapitalization transaction. In
accordance
with SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
we have
determined that this embedded call feature is not a derivative because
the
contract is both 1) indexed in our stock, and 2) is classified in stockholders’
equity on our balance sheet.
A
separate agreement exists with Knowledge Capital, the entity that holds
the
majority of the Series A preferred stock, which contains a call option
to redeem
$30.0 million of preferred stock at 100 percent to 103 percent of the
liquidation preference as well as a “change in control” put option at 101
percent of the liquidation preference. This agreement is a derivative
and meets
the criteria found in paragraph 11 of SFAS No. 150, Accounting
for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities
and
Equity,
to be
separately accounted for as a liability. However, the fiscal 2005 $30.0
million
redemption of Knowledge Capital preferred stock extinguished the call
option in
the recapitalization agreement and the corresponding liability derivative.
Therefore, the incremental change of control feature (the amount in
excess of
100 percent of liquidation preference in the change of control put
option) will
be valued at fair value based upon the likelihood of exercise and the
expected
incremental amount to be paid upon the change of control provision
of the
agreement. This derivative-based liability will require adjustment
to fair value
at each reporting period and had an initial value of zero on the date
of the
recapitalization transaction. At August 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair
value of
this derivative-based liability was zero.
8.
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
Preferred
Stock
Series
A
- Following
the recapitalization of our preferred stock in fiscal 2005, which included
a
one-to-four forward split of existing Series A preferred stock, we
had
3.5
million
shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding. Since the completion
of the
recapitalization, which provided us with the opportunity to redeem
shares of
preferred stock, we have redeemed a total of $50.0
million,
or 2.0
million
shares, of outstanding Series A preferred stock. During fiscal 2006,
we redeemed
$20.0
million,
or 0.8
million
shares, of Series A preferred stock at the liquidation preference,
which is
$25
per
share plus accrued unpaid dividends. At August 31, 2006, we had 1.5
million
shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding.
Series
A
preferred stock dividends accrue at an annual rate of 10.0
percent
and are payable quarterly in cash. At August 31, 2006 and 2005, we
had
$0.9
million
and $1.4
million,
respectively, of accrued Series A preferred dividends, which were recorded
as
components of accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
For
further information regarding the rights and preferences of our recapitalized
Series A preferred stock, refer to the disclosures in Note 7,
“Preferred Stock Recapitalization.”
Series
B
- The
preferred stock recapitalization completed in fiscal 2005 significantly
changed
the rights and preferences of our Series B preferred stock. Our new
Series A
preferred stock automatically converts to shares of Series B preferred
stock if
the holder of the original Series A preferred stock sells, or transfers,
the
preferred stock to another party. Series B preferred stock does not
have
common-equivalent voting rights, but retains substantially all other
characteristics of the new Series A preferred stock. At August 31,
2006, there
were 4.0 million shares of Series B preferred stock authorized and
no shares of
Series B preferred stock outstanding.
Common
Stock Warrants
Pursuant
to the terms of the preferred stock recapitalization plan, we completed
a
one-to-four forward split of the existing Series A preferred stock
and then
bifurcated each share of Series A preferred stock into a new share
of Series A
preferred stock that is no longer convertible into common stock, and
a warrant
to purchase shares of common stock. Accordingly, we issued 6.2 million
common
stock warrants with an exercise price of $8.00 per share (subject to
customary
anti-dilution and exercise features), which will be exercisable over
an
eight-year term. These common stock warrants were recorded at fair
value on the
date of the recapitalization, as determined by a Black-Scholes valuation
methodology, which totaled $7.6
million.
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, a total of 536
warrants
were exercised. We issued common shares from treasury in connection
with the
exercise of these warrants.
Treasury
Stock
During
January 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up
to
$10.0
million
of our currently outstanding common stock. Common stock purchases under
this
plan will be made at the Company’s discretion for prevailing market prices and
will be subject to customary regulatory requirements and considerations.
The
Company does not have a timetable for the purchase of these common
shares and
the authorization by the Board of Directors does not have an expiration
date.
During fiscal 2006 we purchased 681,300
shares
of our common stock under the terms of this plan for $5.1
million.
Accordingly, at August 31, 2006, $4.9
million
was remaining for future purchases of our common stock under the fiscal
2006
Board approved purchase plan. We also purchased 7,900
common
shares for $0.1
million
during fiscal 2006 for exclusive distribution to participants in our
employee
stock purchase plan.
During
the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we issued 71,814;
42,263;
and
99,137
shares
of our common stock held in treasury to participants in the Company’s employee
stock purchase plan and as the result of the exercise of stock options.
Proceeds
from the issuance of these shares totaled $0.4 million, $0.1 million,
and $0.2
million during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004. In addition, we issued
27,000;
563,090;
and
303,660
shares
of our common stock held in treasury in connection with unvested and
fully-vested stock awards during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 (Note
11).
9.
|
MANAGEMENT
COMMON STOCK LOAN PROGRAM
|
During
fiscal 2000, certain of our management personnel borrowed funds from
an external
lender, on a full-recourse basis, to acquire shares of our common stock.
The
loan program closed during fiscal 2001 with 3.825
million
shares of common stock purchased by the loan participants for a total
cost of
$33.6
million,
which was the market value of the shares acquired and distributed to
loan
participants. The Company initially participated on these management
common
stock loans as a guarantor to the lending institution. However, in
connection
with a new credit facility obtained during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2001, we
acquired the loans from the external lender at fair value and are now
the
creditor for these loans. The loans in the management stock loan program
historically accrued interest at 9.4
percent
(compounded quarterly), are full-recourse to the participants, and
were
originally due in March 2005. Although interest accrues on the outstanding
balance over the life of the loans, the Company ceased recording interest
receivable (and related interest income) related to these loans during
the third
quarter of fiscal 2002. However, loan participants remain obligated
to pay all
accrued interest upon maturity of the loans.
In
May
2004, our Board of Directors approved modifications to the terms of
the
management stock loans. While these changes had significant implications
for
most management stock loan program participants, the Company did not
formally
amend or modify the stock loan program notes. Rather, the Company chose
to
forego certain of its rights under the terms of the loans and granted
participants the modifications described below in order to potentially
improve
their ability to pay, and the Company’s ability to collect, the outstanding
balances of the loans. These modifications to the management stock
loan terms
applied to all current and former employees whose loans do not fall
under the
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Loans to the Company’s officers
and directors (as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) were not
affected
by the approved modifications. During fiscal 2005 the Company collected
$0.8
million,
which represented payment in full, from an officer and members of the
Board of
Directors that were required to repay their loans on the original due
date of
March 30, 2005.
The
May
2004 modifications to the management stock loan terms included the
following:
Waiver
of Right to Collect
- The
Company will waive its right to collect the outstanding balance
of the
loans prior to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2008, or (b)
the date after
March 30, 2005 on which the closing price of the Company’s stock
multiplied by the number of shares purchased equals the outstanding
principal and accrued interest on the management stock loans
(the
Breakeven Date).
|
||
Lower
Interest Rate
- Effective
May 7, 2004, the Company prospectively waived collection
of all interest
on the loans in excess of 3.16
percent per annum, which was the “Mid-Term Applicable Federal Rate” for
May 2004.
|
||
Use
of the Company’s Common Stock to Pay Loan
Balances
- The
Company may consider receiving shares of our common stock
as payment on
the loans, which were previously only payable in cash.
|
||
Elimination
of the Prepayment Penalty
- The
Company will waive its right to charge or collect any prepayment
penalty
on the management common stock
loans.
|
These
modifications, including the reduction of the loan program interest
rate, were
not applied retroactively and participants remain obligated to pay
interest
previously accrued using the original interest rate. Also during fiscal
2005,
our Board of Directors approved loan modifications for a former executive
officer and a former director substantially similar to loan modifications
previously granted to other loan participants in the management stock
loan
program as described above.
Prior
to
the May 2004 modifications, the Company accounted for the loans and
the
corresponding shares using a loan-based accounting model that included
guidance
found in SAB 102, Selected
Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues;
SFAS
No. 114, Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of A Loan - an Amendment of FASB Statements
No. 5
and 15;
and
SFAS No. 5, Accounting
for Contingencies.
However, due to the nature of the May 2004 modifications, the Company
reevaluated its accounting for the management stock loan program. Based
upon
guidance found in EITF Issue 00-23, Issues
Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion
No. 25 and
FASB Interpretation No. 44,
and
EITF Issue 95-16, Accounting
for Stock Compensation Agreements with Employer Loan Features under
APB Opinion
No. 25,
we
determined that the management common stock loans should be accounted
for as
non-recourse stock compensation instruments. While this accounting
treatment
does not alter the legal rights associated with the loans to the employees
as
described above, the modifications to the terms of the loans were deemed
significant enough to adopt the non-recourse accounting model as described
in
EITF 00-23. As a result of this accounting treatment, the remaining
carrying
value of the notes and interest receivable related to financing common
stock
purchases by related parties, which totaled $7.6 million prior to the
loan term
modifications, was reduced to zero with a corresponding reduction in
additional
paid-in capital. Since the Company was unable to control the underlying
management common stock loan shares, the loan program shares continued
to be
included in Basic earnings per share (EPS) following the May 2004
modifications.
We
currently account for the management common stock loans as equity-classified
stock option arrangements. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, which
we
adopted on September 1, 2005, additional compensation expense will
be recognized
only if the Company takes action that constitutes a modification which
increases
the fair value of the arrangements. This accounting treatment also
precludes us
from reversing the amounts expensed as additions to the loan loss reserve,
totaling $29.7 million, which were recognized in prior periods.
During
fiscal 2006, the Company offered participants in the management common
stock
loan program the opportunity to formally modify the terms of their
loans in
exchange for placing their shares of common stock purchased through
the loan
program in an escrow account that allows the Company to have a security
interest
in the loan program shares. The key modifications to the management
common stock
loans for the participants accepting the fiscal 2006 offer are as
follows:
Modification
of Promissory Note
-
The management stock loan due date was changed to be the
earlier of (a)
March 30, 2013, or (b) the Breakeven Date as defined by the
May 2004
modifications. The interest rate on the loans will increase
from 3.16
percent compounded annually to 4.72 percent compounded
annually.
|
||
Redemption
of Management Loan Program Shares
-
The Company will have the right to redeem the shares on the
due date in
satisfaction of the promissory notes as
follows:
|
·
|
On
the Breakeven Date, the Company has the right to purchase
and redeem from
the loan participants the number of loan program shares necessary
to
satisfy the participant’s obligation under the promissory note. The
redemption price for each such loan program share will be
equal to the
closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Breakeven
Date.
|
|
·
|
If
the Company’s stock has not closed at or above the breakeven price on
or
before March 30, 2013, the Company has the right to purchase
and redeem
from the participants all of their loan program shares at
the closing
price on that date as partial payment on the participant’s
obligation.
|
The
fiscal 2006 modifications were intended to give the Company a measure
of control
of the outstanding loan program shares and to facilitate payment of
the loans
should the market value of the Company’s stock equal the principal and accrued
interest on the management stock loans. If a loan participant declines
the offer
to modify their management stock loan, their loan will continue to
have the same
terms and conditions that were previously approved in May 2004 by the
Company’s
Board of Directors and their loans will be due at the earlier of March
30, 2008
or the Breakeven Date. Consistent with the May 2004 modifications,
stock loan
participants will be unable to realize a gain on the loan program shares
unless
they pay cash to satisfy the promissory note obligation prior to the
due date.
As of the closing date of the extension offer, which was substantially
completed
in June 2006, management stock loan participants holding approximately
3,508,000
shares,
or 94
percent
of the remaining loan shares, elected to accept the extension offer
and placed
their management stock loan shares into the escrow account.
As
a
result of this modification, the Company reevaluated its accounting
treatment
regarding the loan shares and their inclusion in Basic EPS. Since the
management
stock loan shares held in the escrow account continue to have the same
income
participation rights as other common shareholders, the Company has
determined
that the escrowed loan shares are participating securities as defined
by EITF
03-06, Participating
Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.
128.
As a
result, the management loan shares will be included in the calculation
of Basic
EPS in periods of net income and excluded from Basic EPS in periods
of net loss
beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, which was the completion
of the
escrow agreement modification.
As
a
result of these loan program modifications, the Company hopes to increase
the
total value received from loan participants; however, the inability
of the
Company to collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have
an adverse
impact upon our financial position and future cash flows compared to
full
collection of the loans.
10.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
book
value of our financial instruments at August 31, 2006 and August 31,
2005
approximates their fair values. The assessment of the fair values of
our
financial instruments is based on a variety of factors and assumptions.
Accordingly, the fair values may not represent the actual values of
the
financial instruments that could have been realized at August 31, 2006
or 2005,
or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses
that could
be incurred in an actual sale or settlement. The following methods
and
assumptions were used to determine the fair values of our financial
instruments,
none of which were held for trading or speculative purposes:
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
- The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair
values due
to the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.
Accounts
Receivable
- The
carrying value of accounts receivable approximate their fair value
due to the
short-term maturity and expected collection of these instruments.
Other
Assets
- Our
other
assets, including notes receivable, were recorded at the net realizable
value of
estimated future cash flows from these instruments.
Long-Term
Debt and Financing Obligation
- At
August
31, 2006, our long-term debt consisted of a variable rate mortgage
on our
Canadian facility and a financing obligation resulting from the June
2005 sale
of our corporate headquarters (Note 2).
On
August 31, 2005, we had an additional fixed-rate mortgage related to
one of the
buildings that was sold in June 2005. Further information regarding
the fair
value of these liability instruments is provided below.
Variable-Rate
Debt
-
The fair value of our variable debt approximated its carrying
value since
the prevailing interest rate is adjusted to reflect market
rates that
would be available to us for similar debt with the corresponding
remaining
maturity.
|
||
Fixed
Rate Debt
-
Our fixed-rate debt at August 31, 2005 consisted of a mortgage
on one of
the corporate campus buildings that was sold in June 2005
and was paid in
full during September 2005. Due to the short-term nature
of the mortgage
at August 31, 2005, the fair value of this liability approximated
its
carrying value.
|
||
Financing
Obligation
-
The fair value of the financing obligation approximates its
carrying value
as the interest rate on the obligation approximates the rate
that would be
available to us for similar debt with the same remaining
maturity.
|
Derivative
Instruments
During
the normal course of business, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates due to our international operations and interest
rates.
To manage risks associated with foreign currency exchange and interest
rates, we
make limited use of derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are
financial
instruments that derive their value from one or more underlying financial
instruments. As a matter of policy, our derivative instruments are
entered into
for periods that do not exceed the related underlying exposures and
do not
constitute positions that are independent of those exposures. In addition,
we do
not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes,
nor are
we party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The notional amounts
of
derivatives do not represent actual amounts exchanged by the parties
to the
instrument and thus, are not a measure of exposure to the Company through
its
use of derivatives. Additionally, we enter into derivative agreements
only with
highly rated counterparties.
Foreign
Currency Exposure
- Due to
the global nature of our operations, we are subject to risks associated
with
transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the United
States
dollar, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in
foreign
currencies to United States dollars as a normal part of the reporting
process.
The objective of our foreign currency risk management activities is
to reduce
foreign currency risk in the consolidated financial statements. In
order to
manage foreign currency risks, we make limited use of foreign currency
forward
contracts and other foreign currency related derivative instruments.
Although we
cannot eliminate all aspects of our foreign currency risk, we believe
that our
strategy, which includes the use of derivative instruments, can reduce
the
impacts of foreign currency related issues on our consolidated financial
statements.
Foreign
Currency Forward Contracts - During
the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we utilized
foreign
currency forward contracts to manage the volatility of certain intercompany
financing transactions and other transactions that are denominated
in foreign
currencies. Because these contracts do not meet specific hedge accounting
requirements, gains and losses on these contracts, which expire on
a quarterly
basis, are recognized currently and are used to offset a portion of
the gains or
losses of the related accounts. The gains and losses on these contracts
were
recorded as a component of selling, general, and administrative expense
in our
consolidated income statements and resulted in the following net impact
on the
periods indicated (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Losses
on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
(346
|
)
|
$
|
(437
|
)
|
$
|
(641
|
)
|
|
Gains
on foreign exchange contracts
|
415
|
127
|
227
|
|||||||
Net
gain (loss) on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
69
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
At
August
31, 2006, the fair value of these contracts, which was determined using
the
estimated amount at which contracts could be settled based upon forward
market
exchange rates, was insignificant. The notional amounts of our foreign
currency
sell contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting were as follows
at
August 31, 2006 (in thousands):
Contract
Description
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Notional
Amount in U.S. Dollars
|
|||||
Japanese
Yen
|
290,000
|
$
|
2,491
|
||||
Australian
Dollars
|
1,500
|
1,148
|
|||||
Mexican
Pesos
|
11,650
|
1,061
|
Net
Investment Hedges - During
fiscal 2005 and 2004, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts
that
were designed to manage foreign currency risks related to the value
of our net
investment in directly-owned operations located in Canada, Japan, and
the United
Kingdom. These three offices comprise the majority of our net investment
in
foreign operations. These foreign currency forward instruments qualified
for
hedge accounting and corresponding gains and losses were recorded as
a component
of other comprehensive income in our consolidated balance sheet. During
fiscal
2005 and 2004, we recognized the following net losses on our net investment
hedging contracts (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Losses
on net investment hedge contracts
|
$
|
(384
|
)
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
Gains
on net investment hedge contracts
|
66
|
130
|
|||||
Net
losses on investment hedge contracts
|
$
|
(318
|
)
|
$
|
(207
|
)
|
During
fiscal 2006 we did not utilize net investment hedge contracts. However,
we may
continue to utilize net investment hedge contracts in future periods
as a
component of our overall foreign currency risk strategy.
Interest
Rate Risk Management
-
Due to
the limited nature of our interest rate risk, we do not make regular
use of
interest rate derivatives and we were not a party to any interest rate
derivative instruments during fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005,
and
2004.
11.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION PLANS
|
Overview
We
utilize various share-based compensation plans as integral components
of our
overall compensation and associate retention strategy. The Company’s
shareholders have approved various stock incentive plans that permit
us to grant
performance awards, unvested stock awards, employee stock purchase
plan (ESPP)
shares, and stock options. In addition, our Board of Directors and
shareholders
may, from time to time, approve fully vested stock awards. At August
31, 2006,
our stock option incentive plan, which permits the granting of performance
awards, unvested stock awards to employees, and incentive stock options
had
1,531,000
shares
available for granting and our 2004 ESPP plan had 957,000
shares
authorized for purchase by plan participants. The total cost of our
share-based
compensation plans in fiscal 2006 was as follows (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
|||
Performance
awards
|
$
|
503
|
||
Unvested
share awards
|
296
|
|||
Compensation
cost of ESPP
|
37
|
|||
Stock
options
|
7
|
|||
$
|
843
|
The
compensation cost of our share-based compensation plans was included
in selling,
general, and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
income
statement and no share-based compensation was capitalized during fiscal
2006.
The Company generally issues shares of common stock for its share-based
compensation plans from shares held in treasury. The following is a
description
of our share-based compensation plans.
Performance
Awards
On
January 20, 2006, the Company’s shareholders approved a performance based
long-term incentive plan (the LTIP) that provides for annual issuances
of common
stock to certain managerial personnel and executive management as directed
by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The LTIP performance
awards granted during fiscal 2006 cliff vest on August
31, 2008,
which
is the completion of a three-year performance period. The number of
shares that
are finally awarded to LTIP participants is variable and is based entirely
upon
the achievement of a combination of performance objectives related
to sales
growth and cumulative operating income during the three-year performance
period.
The Compensation Committee initially granted awards for 377,665
shares
(target award) of common stock and the number of shares finally awarded
will
range from zero shares, if a minimum level of performance is not achieved,
to
200 percent of the target award, if specifically defined performance
criteria is
achieved during the three-year performance period.
The
LTIP
performance awards were valued at $6.60
per
share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the grant
date. The
corresponding compensation cost of the LTIP award is being expensed
over the
service period of the award, which ends on August 31, 2008. Due to
the variable
number of shares that may be issued under the LTIP, we reevaluate the
LTIP on a
quarterly basis and adjust the number of shares expected to be awarded
based
upon financial results of the Company as compared to the performance
goals set
for the award. Adjustments to the number of shares awarded, and to
the
corresponding compensation expense, are made on a cumulative basis
at the date
of adjustment based upon the estimated probable number of shares to
be awarded.
Based upon fiscal 2006 financial performance and estimated performance
through
the remaining service period, the number of performance awards granted
during
fiscal 2006 was reduced at August 31, 2006 to 337,588
shares,
which resulted in a cumulative adjustment to our fiscal 2006 operating
results
of $0.1
million.
At August 31, 2006, there was $1.7
million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to our fiscal 2006
performance
awards, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining service
period of
the award. The recognized tax benefit from LTIP performance awards
totaled
$0.2
million
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. During fiscal 2006, performance
awards for 4,000
shares
were forfeited and an additional 5,000
shares
were awarded subsequent to the initial performance award grant. The
intrinsic
value of our LTIP performance awards was $1.9
million,
which was based upon our closing stock price of $5.75
per
share on August 31, 2006.
Unvested
Stock Awards
The
fair
value of unvested stock awards is calculated on the date of grant based
on the
closing market price of our common stock and is amortized to compensation
expense on a straight-line basis over the corresponding vesting periods,
which
generally range from three to five years. The unrecognized compensation
cost
related to unvested stock awards was recorded as deferred compensation
on
unvested stock grants in shareholders’ equity at August 31, 2005. However, due
to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the unrecognized portion of the compensation
cost related to unvested stock awards granted prior to September 1,
2005 was
reclassified as a component of additional paid-in capital. The following
is a
description of our unvested stock awards granted to employees and to
certain
members of our Board of Directors.
Employee
Awards
- During
fiscal 2005 and in prior periods, we have granted unvested stock awards
to
certain employees as long-term incentives. These unvested stock awards
cliff
vest five years from the grant date or on an accelerated basis if we
achieve
specified earnings levels. The compensation cost of these unvested
stock awards
was based on the fair value of our common shares on the grant date
and is
expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting (service) period
of the
awards. The recognition of compensation cost will be accelerated when
we believe
that it is probable that we will achieve the specified earnings thresholds
and
the shares will vest.
In
connection with these unvested stock awards, the participants were
eligible to
receive a cash bonus for a portion of the income taxes resulting from
the grant.
The participants could receive their cash bonus at the time of grant
or when the
award shares vest. These cash bonuses totaled $0.5
million
for awards granted in fiscal 2005, which was expensed as the bonuses
were paid
to the participants on or around the grant date. For fiscal 2004 awards,
the
cash bonuses totaled $0.4
million,
of which $0.2
million
was paid and expensed at the grant date. The remaining $0.2
million
will be expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period,
subject to
acceleration, if necessary.
During
our third quarter of fiscal 2005, we achieved the specified earnings
thresholds
required to accelerate the vesting for one-half of the unvested stock
awards
granted to employees in fiscal 2004 and unvested stock awards granted
to our CEO
in December 2004. Accordingly, during fiscal 2005 we expensed an additional
$0.5
million
of compensation cost related to the accelerated vesting of these unvested
employee stock awards.
The
unvested award shares granted to employees in fiscal 2005 and 2004
were issued
from common stock held in treasury and had a cost basis of $5.2
million
for the awards granted. The difference between the fair value of the
unvested
shares granted and their cost, which totaled $4.2
million
for fiscal 2005 awards and $4.4
million
for fiscal 2004 awards, was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in
capital.
Board
of Director Awards
- During
January 2006, the Company’s shareholders approved changes to our non-employee
directors’ stock incentive plan (the Directors’ Plan). The Directors’ plan was
designed to provide non-employee directors of the Company, who are
ineligible to
participate in our employee stock incentive plan, an opportunity to
acquire an
interest in the Company through the acquisition of shares of common
stock. Under
the previous provisions of the Directors’ Plan, each non-employee director
received an annual unvested stock award with a value (based on the
trading price
of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award) equal to $27,500.
The
primary modification to the Directors’ plan approved by the shareholders changes
the annual unvested stock grant to 4,500
shares
of common stock rather than the dollar value previously defined in
the plan. The
amendment also eliminates the limitation on the maximum dollar value
of all
awards made under the Directors’ Plan in any given year.
Under
terms of the Directors’ Plan, we issued 27,000
shares
and 76,090
shares
of common stock to members of the Board of Directors in fiscal 2006
and 2005.
The fair value of shares awarded under the Directors’ Plan was calculated on the
grant date and the corresponding compensation cost is being recognized
over the
vesting period, which is three years. The cost of the common stock
issued from
treasury stock for these awards was $0.4
million
in fiscal 2006 and $1.3
million
in fiscal 2005.
The
following information applies to our unvested stock awards to both
employees and
to members of the Board of Directors under the Directors’ Plan during fiscal
2006:
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
|
||||||
Unvested
stock awards at August 31, 2005
|
409,295
|
$
|
3.18
|
||||
Granted
|
27,000
|
7.84
|
|||||
Forfeited
|
(5,000
|
)
|
4.00
|
||||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Unvested
stock awards at August 31, 2006
|
431,295
|
$
|
3.46
|
At
August
31, 2006, there was $1.0
million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to our unvested stock
awards,
which is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average vesting
period of
approximately three
years
unless specified accelerator thresholds are met. Compensation expense
related to
our unvested stock awards totaled $0.3
million,
$0.8
million,
and $0.1
million
in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 and the total recognized tax benefit
from
unvested stock awards totaled $0.1
million,
$0.3 million,
and was insignificant
for the
fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The
intrinsic
value of our unvested stock awards was $2.5
million,
which was based upon our closing stock price of $5.75
per
share on August 31, 2006.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The
Company has an employee stock purchase plan (Note 14)
that
offers qualified employees the opportunity to purchase shares of our
common
stock at a price equal to 85 percent of the average fair market value
of the
Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the calendar month in each
fiscal quarter. Based upon guidance in SFAS No. 123R, we determined
that the
discount offered to employees under the ESPP is compensatory and the
amount is
therefore expensed at each grant date. During fiscal 2006, a total
of
32,993
shares
were issued to participants in the ESPP.
Stock
Options
The
Company has an incentive stock option plan whereby options to purchase
shares of
our common stock are issued to key employees at an exercise price not
less than
the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The
term, not to exceed ten years, and exercise period of each incentive
stock
option awarded under the plan are determined by a committee appointed
by our
Board of Directors.
Information
related to stock option activity during fiscal 2006 is presented
below:
Number
of Stock Options
|
Weighted
Avg. Exercise Price Per Share
|
Weighted
Avg. Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (thousands)
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at August 31, 2005
|
2,285,884
|
$
|
12.40
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(38,821
|
)
|
5.54
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(93,375
|
)
|
15.64
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at August 31, 2006
|
2,153,688
|
$
|
12.39
|
3.8
|
$
|
256
|
|||||||
Options
vested and exercisable at August 31, 2006
|
2,128,688
|
$
|
12.51
|
3.8
|
$
|
155
|
We
expect
that all of our remaining stock options to vest and be exercisable.
The
Company did not grant any stock options during the fiscal years ended
August 31,
2006 and 2005 and the remaining unamortized service cost on previously
granted
stock options is insignificant in aggregate. Prior to the adoption
of SFAS No.
123R, a Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used to calculate the
pro forma
compensation expense from stock option activity and the weighted average
fair
value of options granted. The following assumptions were used in the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock options that were granted
in fiscal
2004 for disclosure purposes.
AUGUST
31,
|
2004
|
|||
Dividend
yield
|
None
|
|||
Volatility
|
65.2
|
%
|
||
Expected
life (years)
|
2.9
|
|||
Risk
free rate of return
|
4.2
|
%
|
The
weighted average fair value of options granted under our stock option
plans
during fiscal year 2004 was $0.75
per
share. The estimated fair value of options granted is subject to the
assumptions
made in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and if the assumptions
were to
change, the estimated fair value amounts could be significantly different.
The
following additional information applies to our stock options outstanding
at
August 31, 2006:
Range
of
Exercise
Prices
|
Number
Outstanding at August 31, 2006
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Options
Exercisable at August 31, 2006
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||
$1.70
- $7.00
|
229,628
|
3.6
|
|
$
5.29
|
204,628
|
|
$
5.73
|
|||||||||
$7.75
- $9.69
|
313,500
|
3.0
|
9.19
|
313,500
|
9.19
|
|||||||||||
$14.00
- $14.00
|
1,602,000
|
4.0
|
14.00
|
1,602,000
|
14.00
|
|||||||||||
$17.69
- $18.00
|
8,560
|
1.3
|
17.82
|
8,560
|
17.82
|
The
Company received cash proceeds totaling $0.2
million
in fiscal 2006 and $26,000
in
fiscal 2005 from the exercise of common stock options. The intrinsic
value of
stock options exercised was $0.1
million,
$34,300,
and
zero
for the
fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. The fair value
of options
that vested during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 totaled $9,000,
$5.0
million,
and $0.2
million,
respectively. The fair value of stock options vested in fiscal 2005
included 1.6
million options that were granted to the CEO in fiscal 2001, which
were vested
as a result of changes to the CEO’s compensation plan (Note 19).
Fully-Vested
Stock Award
In
connection with changes to our CEO’s compensation plan (Note 19),
the
CEO was granted 187,000 shares of fully-vested common stock during
the second
quarter of fiscal 2005. The fully-vested stock award was valued at
$2.16
per
share, which was the closing market price of our common stock on the
measurement
date and resulted in $0.4
million
of expense that was included as a component of selling, general, and
administrative expense in fiscal 2005. The cost of the common stock
issued from
treasury was $3.2
million
and the difference between the cost of the treasury stock and fair
value of the
award, which totaled $2.8
million,
was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.
12.
|
LEGAL
SETTLEMENT
|
In
fiscal
2002, we filed legal action against World Marketing Alliance, Inc.,
a Georgia
corporation (WMA), and World Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and
purchaser of substantially all assets of WMA, for breach of contract.
The case
proceeded to trial and the jury rendered a verdict in our favor and
against WMA
on November 1, 2004 for the entire unpaid contract amount of approximately
$1.1
million.
In addition to the verdict, we recovered legal fees totaling $0.3
million
and pre- and post-judgment interest of $0.3
million
from WMA. During our fiscal quarter ended May 28, 2005, we received
payment in
cash from WMA for the total verdict amount, including legal fees and
interest.
However, shortly after paying the verdict amount, WMA appealed the
jury decision
to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and we recorded receipt of the
verdict
amount plus legal fees and interest with a corresponding increase to
accrued
liabilities and deferred the gain until the case was finally resolved.
On
December 30, 2005, the Company entered into a settlement agreement
with WMA.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement, WMA agreed to dismiss
its appeal.
As a result of this settlement agreement and dismissal of WMA’s appeal, we
recorded a $0.9
million
gain from the legal settlement during fiscal 2006. We also recorded
a
$0.3
million
reduction in selling, general and, administrative expenses during fiscal
2006
for recovered legal expenses.
13.
|
GAIN
ON DISPOSAL OF INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARY
|
During
fiscal 2003, the Company purchased approximately 20 percent of the
capital stock
(subsequently diluted to approximately 12 percent ownership) of Agilix
Labs,
Inc. (Agilix), a Delaware corporation, for cash payments totaling $1.0
million.
Agilix is a development stage enterprise that develops software applications,
including the majority of our software applications that are available
for sale
to external customers. We used the equity method of accounting for
our
investment in Agilix, as the Company appointed a member to Agilix’s board of
directors and had the ability to exercise significant influence over
the
operations of Agilix. Although we continue to sell software developed
by Agilix,
uncertainties in Agilix’s business plan developed during our fiscal quarter
ended March 1, 2003 and their potential adverse effects on Agilix’s operations
and future cash flows were significant. Based on these factors, we
determined
that our ability to recover the carrying value of our investment in
Agilix was
remote. Accordingly, we impaired and expensed our remaining investment
in Agilix
of $0.9
million
during fiscal 2003.
During
fiscal 2005, certain affiliates of Agilix purchased the shares of capital
stock
held by the Company for $0.5
million
in cash, which was reported as a gain on disposal of investment in
unconsolidated subsidiary. In fiscal 2006, we reclassified the gain
on the sale
of our interest in Agilix from operating income to a component of other
income
and expense on the fiscal 2005 income statement. Following the sale
of the
Agilix capital stock, we have no remaining ownership interest in Agilix,
no
representative on their board of directors, or any remaining obligations
associated with our investment in Agilix.
14.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Profit
Sharing Plans
We
have
defined contribution profit sharing plans for our employees that qualify
under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. These plans provide retirement
benefits for employees meeting minimum age and service requirements.
Qualified
participants may contribute up to 75
percent
of their gross wages, subject to certain limitations. These plans also
provide
for matching contributions to the participants that are paid by the
Company. The
matching contributions, which were expensed as incurred, totaled $1.3
million,
$0.8
million,
and $0.7
million,
for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The
Company has an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) that offers qualified
employees the opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock at
a price
equal to 85 percent of the average fair market value of the Company’s common
stock on the last trading day of each fiscal quarter. A total of 32,993;
27,266;
and
99,136;
shares
were issued under this plan in the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006,
2005, and
2004, which had a corresponding cost basis of $0.2
million,
$0.1
million,
and $0.2
million,
respectively. The Company received cash proceeds from the ESPP participants
totaling $0.2
million,
$0.1
million,
and $0.2
million
for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004. On August 31, 2004, our previously
existing employee stock purchase plan expired. Since the new employee
stock
purchase plan was not ratified by shareholders until March 2005, the
Company did
not withhold employee contributions for approximately six months in
fiscal 2005
and substantially fewer shares were issued to plan participants during
fiscal
2005 than in previous years.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
The
Company has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that provided
certain key
officers and employees the ability to defer a portion of their compensation
until a later date. Deferred compensation amounts used to pay benefits
are held
in a “rabbi trust,” which invests in insurance contracts, various mutual funds,
and shares of the Company’s common stock as directed by the plan participants.
The trust assets, which consist of the investments in insurance contracts
and
mutual funds, are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets because
they are
subject to the claims of our creditors. The corresponding deferred
compensation
liability represents the amounts deferred by plan participants plus
or minus any
earnings or losses on the trust assets. The deferred compensation plan’s assets
totaled $1.2
million
at August 31, 2006 and 2005, while the plan’s liabilities totaled $1.1
million
and $1.3
million
at August 31, 2006 and 2005. At August 31, 2006, the rabbi trust also
held
shares of our common stock with a cost basis of $0.6
million.
The assets and liabilities of the deferred compensation plan were recorded
in
other long-term assets, treasury stock, additional paid-in capital,
and
long-term liabilities, as appropriate, in the accompanying consolidated
balance
sheets.
We
expensed charges totaling $0.1
million,
$0.8
million,
and $0.2
million
during each of the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
related to
our deferred compensation plan. Due to increases in the market value
of our
common stock held by the deferred compensation plan during fiscal 2005
which
increased the plan liability to participants without a corresponding
increase in
plan assets, we recorded increased expenses associated with our deferred
compensation plan. To reduce expenses from the plan in future periods,
we
modified the deferred compensation plan to require participants who
hold shares
of our common stock to receive distributions in common stock rather
than cash.
Accordingly, $0.9
million
of the plan liability at the date of the modification was reclassified
to
additional paid-in capital.
Due
to
legal changes resulting from the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,
the Company
determined to cease compensation deferrals to this deferred compensation
plan
after December 31, 2004. Other than the cessation of compensation deferrals
and
the requirement to distribute investments in Company stock with shares
of stock,
the plan will continue to operate and make payments to participants
under the
same rules as in prior periods.
15.
|
RESTRUCTURING
AND STORE CLOSURE COSTS
|
Restructuring
Costs
During
fiscal 1999, our Board of Directors approved a plan to restructure
our
operations, reduce our workforce, and formally exit certain leased
office space
located in Provo, Utah. The Company, under a long-term agreement, leased
the
Provo office space in buildings that were owned by partnerships, the
majority
interest of which were owned by the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors
and
certain other employees and former employees of the Company. During
the first
quarter of fiscal 2005, we exercised an option, available under our
master lease
agreement, to purchase, and simultaneously sell, the office facility
to the
current tenant, an unrelated party. Based on the continuing negative
cash flow
associated with these buildings, and other factors, we determined that
it was in
our best interest to exercise the option and sell the property.
The
negotiated purchase price with the landlord was $14.0
million
and the tenant agreed to purchase the property for $12.5
million.
These prices were within the range of estimated fair values of the
buildings as
determined by an independent appraisal obtained by the Company. We
paid the
difference between the sale and purchase prices, plus other closing
costs, which
were included as a component of the restructuring plan accrual. After
accounting
for the sale transaction, the remaining fiscal 1999 accrued restructuring
costs,
which totaled $0.3
million,
were reversed and recorded as a reduction to selling, general, and
administrative expenses in our consolidated income statement. Following
the sale
of these buildings, we have no further obligations remaining under
the fiscal
1999 restructuring plan.
Retail
Store Closure Costs
We
regularly assess the operating performance of our retail stores, including
previous operating performance trends and projected future profitability.
During
this assessment process, judgments are made as to whether under-performing
or
unprofitable stores should be closed. As a result of this evaluation
process, we
closed 16
retail
stores during fiscal 2006, 30
retail
stores in fiscal 2005, and we may close additional retail locations
in future
periods if further analysis indicates that our operating results may
be improved
through additional closures. We have incurred severance and lease termination
costs related to these store closure activities, which are included
as a
component of selling, general, and administrative expenses in our consolidated
income statements.
The
components of the remaining restructuring and store closure accruals
were as
follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Severance
Costs
|
Leased
Space Exit Costs
|
Total
|
||||||||
Balance
at August 31, 2004
|
$
|
16
|
$ |
2,766
|
$ |
2,782
|
||||
Charges
to the accrual
|
279
|
293
|
572
|
|||||||
Amounts
utilized
|
(266
|
)
|
(2,719
|
)
|
(2,985
|
)
|
||||
Balance
at August 31, 2005
|
29
|
|
340
|
|
369
|
|||||
Charges
to the accrual
|
70
|
26
|
96
|
|||||||
Amounts
utilized
|
(91
|
)
|
(128
|
)
|
(219
|
)
|
||||
Balance
at August 31, 2006
|
$
|
8
|
$ |
238
|
$ |
246
|
At
August
31, 2006, the accrued store closure costs were recorded as a component
of
accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. During fiscal
2006 and
fiscal 2005 we accrued and expensed additional leased space exit costs
totaling
$26,000
and
$0.2
million
related to changes in estimated sublease receipts on three retail store
closures
that occurred during prior fiscal years. Retail stores closures in
fiscal 2006
generally coincided with the expiration of our leases at those locations
and we
did not incur additional expense resulting from the closure of the
store.
Although we believe that our accruals for retail store closures are
adequate at
August 31, 2006, these amounts are partially based upon estimates and
may change
if actual amounts related to these activities differ from those
estimates.
16.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
benefit (provision) for income taxes consisted of the following (in
thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
1,433
|
$
|
1,857
|
$
|
1,615
|
||||
State
|
(23
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
151
|
|||||
Foreign
|
(1,903
|
)
|
(1,180
|
)
|
(2,492
|
)
|
||||
(493
|
)
|
675
|
(726
|
)
|
||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
(4,380
|
)
|
$
|
(2,132
|
)
|
$
|
3,440
|
||
State
|
(376
|
)
|
(285
|
)
|
310
|
|||||
Foreign
|
(132
|
)
|
378
|
(623
|
)
|
|||||
Change
in valuation allowance
|
20,323
|
2,449
|
(3,750
|
)
|
||||||
15,435
|
410
|
(623
|
)
|
|||||||
$
|
14,942
|
$
|
1,085
|
$
|
(1,349
|
)
|
Income
(loss) from operations before income taxes consisted of the following
(in
thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
10,881
|
$
|
6,094
|
$
|
(10,716
|
)
|
|||
Foreign
|
2,750
|
3,007
|
1,915
|
|||||||
$
|
13,631
|
$
|
9,101
|
$
|
(8,801
|
)
|
The
differences between income taxes at the statutory federal income tax
rate and
income taxes reported in our consolidated income statements were as
follows:
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Federal
statutory income tax rate
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
35.0
|
%
|
||||
State
income taxes, net of federal effect
|
2.9
|
3.2
|
5.7
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax valuation allowance
|
(149.1
|
)
|
(26.9
|
)
|
(49.1
|
)
|
||||
Foreign
jurisdictions tax differential
|
2.2
|
(2.9
|
)
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|||||
Tax
differential on income subject to both U.S. and foreign
taxes
|
1.5
|
5.1
|
(9.5
|
)
|
||||||
Resolution
of tax matters
|
(9.4
|
)
|
(29.6
|
)
|
8.8
|
|||||
Tax
on management stock loan interest
|
4.5
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
|
2.8
|
4.2
|
.9
|
|||||||
(109.6
|
)%
|
(11.9
|
)%
|
(15.3
|
)%
|
Due
to
improved operating performance and the availability of expected future
taxable
income, we have concluded that it is more likely than not that the
benefits of
deferred income tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, we reversed
the
valuation allowances on the majority of our net deferred income tax
assets
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 (see further discussion
below).
We
paid
significant amounts of withholding tax on foreign royalties during
fiscal years
2006, 2005, and 2004. However, no domestic foreign tax credits were
available to
offset the foreign withholding taxes during those years.
Various
income tax matters were resolved during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004,
which
resulted in net tax benefits to the Company. The tax benefit recognized
in
fiscal 2006 was partially offset by an assessment paid in a foreign
tax
jurisdiction.
The
Company accrues taxable interest income on outstanding management common
stock
loans (Note 9). Consistent with the accounting treatment for these
loans, the
Company is not recognizing interest income for book purposes, thus
resulting in
a permanent book versus tax difference.
The
significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities were
comprised
of the following (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax assets:
|
|||||||
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
$
|
14,321
|
$
|
15,313
|
|||
Sale
and financing of corporate headquarters
|
12,193
|
12,383
|
|||||
Impairment
of investment in Franklin Covey Coaching, LLC
|
2,787
|
3,341
|
|||||
Foreign
income tax credit carryforward
|
2,246
|
2,246
|
|||||
Vacation
and other accruals
|
1,524
|
1,438
|
|||||
Inventory
and bad debt reserves
|
1,391
|
2,103
|
|||||
Alternative
minimum tax carryforward
|
701
|
748
|
|||||
Sales
returns and contingencies
|
689
|
1,954
|
|||||
Deferred
compensation
|
685
|
815
|
|||||
Intangible
asset amortization and impairment
|
571
|
1,878
|
|||||
Loan
loss reserve on management stock loans
|
-
|
15,234
|
|||||
Other
|
843
|
790
|
|||||
Total
deferred income tax assets
|
37,951
|
58,243
|
|||||
Less:
valuation allowance
|
(2,622
|
)
|
(38,180
|
)
|
|||
Net
deferred income tax assets
|
35,329
|
20,063
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
Intangibles
and property and equipment step-ups - definite lived
|
(13,902
|
)
|
(14,922
|
)
|
|||
Intangibles
and property and equipment step-ups - indefinite lived
|
(8,595
|
)
|
(8,611
|
)
|
|||
Property
and equipment depreciation
|
(3,848
|
)
|
(2,636
|
)
|
|||
Unremitted
earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
(291
|
)
|
(377
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
(234
|
)
|
(461
|
)
|
|||
Total
deferred income tax liabilities
|
(26,870
|
)
|
(27,007
|
)
|
|||
Net
deferred income taxes
|
$
|
8,459
|
$
|
(6,944
|
)
|
Deferred
income tax amounts are recorded as follows in our consolidated balance
sheets
(in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Other
current assets
|
$
|
4,130
|
$
|
2,396
|
|||
Other
long-term assets
|
4,340
|
375
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax liability
|
(11
|
)
|
(9,715
|
)
|
|||
Net
deferred income tax asset (liability)
|
$
|
8,459
|
$
|
(6,944
|
)
|
A
federal
net operating loss of $33.3
million
was generated in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2006 and 2005, a total of $15.8
million
of the fiscal 2003 loss carryforward was utilized, leaving a remaining
loss
carryforward from fiscal 2003 of $17.5
million,
which expires on August 31, 2023. The federal net operating loss carryforward
generated in fiscal 2004 totaled $20.8
million
and expires on August 31, 2024. The total loss carryforward includes
$0.7
million
of deductions applicable to additional paid-in capital that will be
credited
once all loss carryforward amounts are utilized.
The
state
net operating loss carryforward of $33.3
million
generated in fiscal 2003 was reduced by the utilization of $15.8
million
in fiscal 2006 and 2005 for a net carryforward amount of $17.5
million,
which primarily expires between August 31, 2007 and August 31, 2018.
The state
net operating loss carryforward of $20.8
million
generated in fiscal 2004 primarily expires between August 31, 2007
and August
31, 2019.
The
amount of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards remaining
at August
31, 2006 and deductible against future years’ taxable income are subject to
limitations imposed by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and
similar
state statutes. As a result of Section 382 limitations, our loss limitations
are
estimated to be $18.1
million
for fiscal 2007 and $9.5
million
per year in subsequent years.
Our
deferred income tax asset valuation allowance decreased by $35.6
million
during fiscal 2006. In connection with the reduction in our valuation
allowance,
we removed $15.2
million
in deferred income tax assets and the corresponding valuation allowance
on the
management common stock loans, given the change in the accounting treatment
of
the management stock loan program (Note 9). The remaining reduction
in our
deferred income tax asset valuation allowance resulted in a tax benefit
of
$20.4
million
in fiscal 2006. Because of the accounting treatment of the management
stock
loans, if any tax benefit is eventually realized on these loans it
will be
recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital, rather than
reducing our
income tax expense.
To
realize the benefit of our deferred income tax assets, we must generate
total
taxable income of approximately $112
million
over the next 20 years. Taxable income of approximately $69
million
results from the reversal of temporary taxable differences. The remaining
taxable income of approximately $43
million
must be generated by the operations of the Company. The table below
presents the
pre-tax book income (loss), significant book versus tax differences,
and taxable
income (loss) for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (in
thousands).
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Domestic
pre-tax book income (loss)
|
$
|
10,881
|
$
|
6,094
|
$
|
(10,716
|
)
|
|||
Sale
of corporate headquarters
|
-
|
11,386
|
-
|
|||||||
Interest
on management common stock loans
|
1,771
|
1,683
|
3,406
|
|||||||
Amortization/write-off
of intangible assets
|
(1,944
|
)
|
(5,402
|
)
|
(10,224
|
)
|
||||
Property
and equipment depreciation and dispositions
|
(3,114
|
)
|
545
|
(2,669
|
)
|
|||||
Changes
in accrued liabilities
|
(4,153
|
)
|
(625
|
)
|
(3,928
|
)
|
||||
Other
book versus tax differences
|
(1,108
|
)
|
(277
|
)
|
1,816
|
|||||
$
|
2,333
|
$
|
13,404
|
$
|
(22,315
|
)
|
To
achieve improved operating results, we have worked extensively on developing
formal business models, which provides for improved budgeting, better
fiscal
discipline, and an improved ability to adjust to changes in the business
environment. Due to improved operating performance and expectations
regarding
future taxable income, the Company has concluded that it is more likely
than not
that the benefits of domestic operating loss carryforwards, together
with the
benefits of other deferred income tax assets will be realized. Accordingly,
we
reversed the valuation allowances on certain domestic deferred tax
assets,
except for $2.2
million
related to foreign tax credits.
As
discussed in Note 2,
we
completed the sale and financing of our corporate headquarters facility
during
fiscal 2005. For financial reporting purposes, the sale of the facility
was
treated as a financing transaction and no gain was recognized on the
sale.
However, for tax purposes, the transaction was accounted for as a sale,
resulting in a taxable gain of $11.4
million.
Our
foreign income tax credit carryforward of $2.2
million
that was generated during fiscal 2002 expires on August 31, 2012.
17.
|
EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net
income or
loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number
of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing
net
income or loss available to common shareholders, by the weighted-average
number
of common shares outstanding plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive
securities using the treasury stock method or the “as converted” method, as
appropriate. Following the preferred stock recapitalization (Note 7)
in
fiscal 2005, our preferred stock is no longer convertible or entitled
to
participate in dividends payable to holders of common stock. Accordingly,
we no
longer account for the conversion and common dividend rights of the
preferred
stock using the two-class method of calculating EPS as defined in SFAS
No. 128,
Earnings
Per Share,
and
EITF Issue 03-6, Participating
Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.
128,
for
periods after February 26, 2005. However, due to modifications to our
management
stock loan program (Note 9)
made
during fiscal 2006, we determined that the shares of management stock
loan
participants that accepted the offer and were placed in an escrow account
are
participating securities as defined by EITF Issue 03-6 because they
continue to
have equivalent common stock dividend rights. Accordingly, these management
stock loan shares are included in our Basic EPS calculation during
periods of
net income and excluded from the Basic EPS calculation in periods of
net
loss.
The
following table presents the computation of our EPS for the periods
indicated
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
28,573
|
$
|
10,186
|
$
|
(10,150
|
)
|
|||
Non-convertible
preferred stock dividends
|
(4,385
|
)
|
(3,903
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Convertible
preferred stock dividends
|
-
|
(4,367
|
)
|
(8,735
|
)
|
|||||
Loss
on recapitalization of preferred stock
|
-
|
(7,753
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to common shareholders
|
$
|
24,188
|
$
|
(5,837
|
)
|
$
|
(18,885
|
)
|
||
Undistributed
income (loss) through February 26, 2005
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
4,244
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Common
stock ownership on an “as converted” basis
|
-
|
76
|
%
|
-
|
||||||
Common
shareholder interest in undistributed income through February
26,
2005
|
-
|
3,225
|
-
|
|||||||
Undistributed
income (loss) in fiscal year indicated
|
24,188
|
$
|
(10,081
|
)
|
$
|
(18,885
|
)
|
|||
Common
shareholder interest in undistributed income (loss)(1)
|
$
|
24,188
|
$
|
(6,856
|
)
|
$
|
(18,885
|
)
|
||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - Basic
|
20,134
|
19,949
|
19,734
|
|||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities(2):
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
52
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Unvested
stock awards
|
281
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Performance
awards
|
38
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Common
stock warrants
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - Diluted
|
20,554
|
19,949
|
19,734
|
|||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$
|
1.20
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
||
Diluted
EPS
|
$
|
1.18
|
$
|
(.34
|
)
|
$
|
(.96
|
)
|
(1)
Preferred
shareholders do not participate in any undistributed losses with common
shareholders; therefore, no adjustments to the fiscal 2004 loss per
share
information were made.
(2)
For
the
fiscal years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 conversion of common share
equivalents is not assumed because conversion of such securities would
be
anti-dilutive.
Due
to
their anti-dilutive effect, the following incremental shares from Series
A
preferred stock calculated on an “as converted” basis and the potential common
stock equivalents resulting from options to purchase common stock and
unvested
stock deferred compensation awards that were calculated using the treasury
stock
method were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation in fiscal 2005
and 2004
(in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||
Number
of Series A preferred stock shares on an “as converted”
basis
|
-
|
6,239
|
|||||
Common
stock equivalents from the assumed exercise of “in-the-money” stock
options
|
58
|
22
|
|||||
Common
stock equivalents from unvested stock deferred
compensation
|
175
|
-
|
|||||
233
|
6,261
|
At
August
31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we had 2.0
million,
2.0
million,
and 0.8
million,
stock options outstanding (Note 11)
which
were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares
outstanding because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of the Company’s common stock. Also, as a result of the preferred
stock recapitalization (Note 7),
we
issued 6.2 million common stock warrants during fiscal 2005 with an
exercise
price of $8.00 per share. These warrants, which expire in eight years,
will have
a more significant dilutive impact on our EPS calculation in future
periods if
the market price of our common stock increases.
18.
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
Reportable
Segments
The
Company has two segments: the Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU)
and the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit (OSBU). The following is a description
of
our segments, their primary operating components, and their significant
business
activities:
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit
-
This business unit is primarily focused on sales to individual
customers
and includes the results of our domestic retail stores, consumer
direct
operations (catalog, eCommerce, and public seminars), wholesale
operations, and other related distribution channels, including
government
product sales and domestic printing and publishing sales.
The CSBU results
of operations also include the financial results of our paper
planner
manufacturing operations. Although CSBU sales primarily consist
of
products such as planners, binders, software, public seminars,
and
handheld electronic planning devices, virtually any component
of our
leadership, productivity, and strategy execution solutions
may be
purchased through CSBU channels.
|
||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit
-
The OSBU is primarily responsible for the development, marketing,
sale,
and delivery of strategic execution, productivity, leadership,
sales force
performance, and communication training and consulting solutions
directly
to organizational clients, including other companies, the
government, and
educational institutions. The OSBU includes the financial
results of our
domestic sales force and our international operations. The
domestic sales
force is responsible for the sale and delivery of our training
and
consulting services in the United States. Our international
sales group
includes the financial results of our directly owned foreign
offices and
royalty revenues from licensees.
|
Our
chief
operating decision maker is the CEO, and each of the segments has a
president
who reports directly to the CEO. The primary measurement used in business
unit performance analysis is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
and
amortization (EBITDA), which may not be calculated as similarly titled
amounts
are calculated by other companies. For segment reporting purposes,
our
consolidated EBITDA can be calculated as our income or loss from operations
excluding depreciation and amortization charges.
In
the
normal course of business, the Company may make structural and cost
allocation
revisions to its segment information to reflect new reporting responsibilities
within the organization. During fiscal 2006, we transferred our public
seminar
programs from the domestic unit of OSBU to the consumer direct channel
in CSBU.
We also transferred the operations of certain corporate departments,
such as
Franklin Covey travel, information systems administration, and accounts
payable,
to the operating segments. All prior period segment information has
been revised
to conform to the most recent classifications and organizational changes.
The
Company accounts for its segment information on the same basis as the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Year Ended
August
31, 2006
|
Sales
to External Customers
|
Gross
Profit
|
EBITDA
|
Depreciation
|
Amortization
|
Segment
Assets
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
62,440
|
36,199
|
$
|
3,727
|
$
|
1,289
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,616
|
$
|
855
|
|||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
63,681
|
38,166
|
29,742
|
56
|
-
|
538
|
517
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
19,783
|
9,994
|
9,315
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
4,910
|
794
|
(29,352
|
)
|
1,283
|
57
|
6,107
|
1,520
|
||||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
150,814
|
85,153
|
13,432
|
2,628
|
57
|
13,261
|
2,892
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
71,108
|
45,475
|
5,450
|
340
|
3,747
|
83,292
|
4,429
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
56,701
|
36,757
|
10,472
|
1,193
|
9
|
21,860
|
701
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
127,809
|
82,232
|
15,922
|
1,533
|
3,756
|
105,152
|
5,130
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
278,623
|
167,385
|
29,354
|
4,161
|
3,813
|
118,413
|
8,022
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and Eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(6,716
|
)
|
618
|
-
|
98,146
|
153
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
278,623
|
167,385
|
22,638
|
4,779
|
3,813
|
216,559
|
8,175
|
|||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Year Ended
August
31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
74,331
|
42,455
|
$
|
4,425
|
2,589
|
-
|
$
|
7,992
|
$
|
996
|
|||||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
62,873
|
37,340
|
23,843
|
528
|
-
|
90
|
72
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
19,691
|
9,184
|
8,408
|
1
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
3,757
|
(1,388
|
)
|
(27,092
|
)
|
2,516
|
344
|
5,495
|
689
|
|||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
160,652
|
87,591
|
9,584
|
5,634
|
344
|
13,579
|
1,757
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
68,816
|
44,332
|
6,587
|
305
|
3,816
|
86,910
|
2,683
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
54,074
|
36,772
|
12,772
|
1,295
|
7
|
21,183
|
742
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
122,890
|
81,104
|
19,359
|
1,600
|
3,823
|
108,093
|
3,425
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
283,542
|
168,695
|
28,943
|
7,234
|
4,167
|
121,672
|
5,182
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and Eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(8,553
|
)
|
540
|
6
|
111,561
|
1,181
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
283,542
|
168,695
|
20,390
|
7,774
|
4,173
|
233,233
|
6,363
|
|||||||||||||||
Fiscal
Year Ended
August
31, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
87,922
|
$
|
47,420
|
$
|
793
|
$
|
3,385
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
9,867
|
$
|
220
|
||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
60,091
|
34,412
|
18,327
|
1,055
|
-
|
550
|
257
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
21,081
|
9,544
|
8,623
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
2,007
|
(3,933
|
)
|
(26,646
|
)
|
3,895
|
344
|
10,062
|
2,014
|
|||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
171,101
|
87,443
|
1,097
|
8,336
|
344
|
20,479
|
2,491
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
56,015
|
35,315
|
637
|
602
|
3,816
|
91,166
|
127
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
48,318
|
33,043
|
10,073
|
1,383
|
7
|
23,807
|
741
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
104,333
|
68,358
|
10,710
|
1,985
|
3,823
|
114,973
|
868
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
275,434
|
155,801
|
11,807
|
10,321
|
4,167
|
135,452
|
3,359
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and Eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(4,924
|
)
|
1,453
|
6
|
92,173
|
611
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
275,434
|
155,801
|
6,883
|
11,774
|
4,173
|
227,625
|
3,970
|
Capital
expenditures in our OSBU domestic segment include $3.8
million
and $2.2
million
of spending on capitalized curriculum during the fiscal years ended
August 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
A
reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to consolidated income
(loss) before
taxes is provided below (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Reportable
segment EBITDA
|
$
|
29,354
|
$
|
28,943
|
$
|
11,807
|
||||
Corporate
expenses
|
(6,716
|
)
|
(8,553
|
)
|
(4,924
|
)
|
||||
Consolidated
EBITDA
|
22,638
|
20,390
|
6,883
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
(4,779
|
)
|
(7,774
|
)
|
(11,774
|
)
|
||||
Amortization
|
(3,813
|
)
|
(4,173
|
)
|
(4,173
|
)
|
||||
Consolidated
income (loss) from operations
|
$
|
14,046
|
$
|
8,443
|
$
|
(9,064
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
1,334
|
944
|
481
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2,622
|
)
|
(786
|
)
|
(218
|
)
|
||||
Legal
settlement
|
873
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Gain
on disposal of investment in unconsolidated subsidiary
|
- |
500
|
-
|
|||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
$
|
13,631
|
$
|
9,101
|
$
|
(8,801
|
)
|
Interest
expense and interest income are primarily generated at the corporate
level and
are not allocated to the segments. Income taxes are likewise calculated
and paid
on a corporate level (except for entities that operate in foreign jurisdictions)
and are not allocated to segments for analysis.
Corporate
assets, such as cash, accounts receivable, and other assets are not
generally
allocated to business segments for business analysis purposes. However,
inventories, intangible assets, goodwill, identifiable fixed assets,
and certain
other assets are classified by segment. A reconciliation of segment
assets to
consolidated assets is as follows (in thousands):
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Reportable
segment assets
|
$
|
118,413
|
$
|
121,672
|
$
|
135,452
|
||||
Corporate
assets
|
99,763
|
112,955
|
93,138
|
|||||||
Intercompany
accounts receivable
|
(1,617
|
)
|
(1,394
|
)
|
(965
|
)
|
||||
$
|
216,559
|
$
|
233,233
|
$
|
227,625
|
Enterprise-Wide
Information
Our
revenues are derived primarily from the United States. However, we
also operate
directly owned offices or contract with licensees to provide products
and
services in various countries throughout the world. Our consolidated
revenues
were derived from the following countries (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDED AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
221,880
|
$
|
229,469
|
$
|
227,116
|
||||
Japan
|
21,569
|
20,905
|
17,676
|
|||||||
United
Kingdom
|
8,587
|
9,707
|
9,251
|
|||||||
Canada
|
8,197
|
6,910
|
7,093
|
|||||||
Mexico
|
3,799
|
4,181
|
3,609
|
|||||||
Australia
|
3,439
|
3,377
|
3,167
|
|||||||
Brazil/South
America
|
3,078
|
2,053
|
1,559
|
|||||||
Korea
|
1,403
|
1,232
|
822
|
|||||||
Singapore
|
1,072
|
985
|
1,189
|
|||||||
Indonesia/Malaysia
|
624
|
567
|
475
|
|||||||
Others
|
4,975
|
4,156
|
3,477
|
|||||||
$
|
278,623
|
$
|
283,542
|
$
|
275,434
|
The
Company has directly-owned offices in Japan, Canada, the United Kingdom,
Canada,
Australia, Brazil, and Mexico. Our long-lived assets held in these
locations
were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
AUGUST
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Long-lived
assets:
|
||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
124,208
|
$
|
122,937
|
$
|
129,416
|
||||
Americas
|
2,661
|
2,620
|
2,484
|
|||||||
Japan
|
1,489
|
1,527
|
2,409
|
|||||||
United
Kingdom
|
735
|
641
|
694
|
|||||||
Australia
|
346
|
326
|
393
|
|||||||
$
|
129,439
|
$
|
128,051
|
$
|
135,396
|
Inter-segment
sales were immaterial and are eliminated in consolidation.
19.
|
CEO
COMPENSATION AGREEMENT
|
During
fiscal 2005, our Board of Directors approved changes to a number of
items in the
CEO’s employment agreement. These changes were enacted during the fiscal
year
ended August 31, 2005. At the request of the CEO, this new compensation
arrangement includes the following:
·
|
The
previously existing CEO employment agreement, which extended
until 2007,
was canceled and the CEO became an “at-will” employee.
|
|
·
|
The
CEO signed a waiver forgoing claims on past compensation
not
taken.
|
|
·
|
The
CEO agreed to be covered by change in control and severance
policies
provided for other Company executives rather than the “golden parachute”
severance package in his previously existing agreement.
|
|
·
|
In
accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the CEO
will not be entitled to obtain a loan in order to exercise
his stock
options.
|
In
return
for these changes to the CEO’s compensation structure and in recognition of the
CEO’s leadership in achieving substantial improvements in our operating
results,
the following compensation terms were approved:
·
|
The
CEO’s cash compensation, both base compensation and incentive
compensation, remained essentially unchanged.
|
|||
·
|
Acceleration
of the vesting on the CEO’s 1.6 million stock options with an exercise
price of $14.00 per share (Note 1).
|
|||
·
|
A
grant of 225,000 shares of unvested stock was awarded as
a long-term
incentive consistent with the unvested stock awards made
to other key
employees in January 2004. In addition, the Company granted
the CEO
187,000 shares of common stock that is fully vested. The
compensation cost
of both of these awards was $0.9 million, of which $0.4 million
was
expensed and the other $0.5 million was initially recorded
as deferred
compensation in shareholders’ equity and amortized over five years,
subject to accelerated vesting if certain performance thresholds
are met
(Note 11).
|
|||
·
|
The
Company has provided life insurance and disability coverage
in an amount
equal to 2.5 times the CEO’s cash compensation, using insurance policies
that are similar to those approved for other
executives.
|
20. | EXECUTIVE SEPARATION AGREEMENT |
Effective
March 29, 2005, Val J. Christensen, Executive Vice-President, General
Counsel
and Secretary of the Company, terminated his service as an executive
officer and
employee of the Company. Under the terms of the corresponding Separation
Agreement, we paid Mr. Christensen a lump-sum severance amount totaling
$0.9
million, less applicable withholdings. In addition, he received the
cash
performance bonus he would have been entitled to for the current fiscal
year as
if he had remained employed in his prior position and his performance
objectives
for the year were met, which totaled $0.2 million. In addition to these
payments, his shares of unvested stock were fully vested and he received
a bonus
of $0.1 million, which was equivalent to other bonuses awarded in the
January
2004 unvested stock award, to offset a portion of the income taxes
resulting
from the vesting of this award. The Company also waived the requirement
that his
fully-vested stock options be exercised within 90 days of his termination
and
allowed the options to be exercised through the term of the option
agreement. We
accounted for the stock option modifications under APB Opinion 25 and
related
pronouncements and did not recognize additional compensation expense
in our
financial statements as the fair value of the Company’s stock was less than the
exercise price of the modified stock options on the re-measurement
date.
However, the fair value of these stock option modifications using guidance
in
SFAS No. 123 was approximately $0.1 million and was included in the
pro forma
stock-based compensation expense reported in Note 1.
Subsequent
to his separation, the Board of Directors approved modifications to
his
management stock loan substantially similar to the modifications granted
to
other loan participants by the Board of Directors in May 2004 under
which the
Company will forego certain of its rights under the terms of the loans
in order
to potentially improve the participants’ ability to pay, and our ability to
collect, the outstanding balances of the loans (Note 9).
Subsequent
to entering into the Separation Agreement, the Company and Mr. Christensen
entered into a Legal Services Agreement that is effective March 29,
2005. Under
terms of the Legal Services Agreement, we retained Mr. Christensen
as
independent legal counsel to provide services for a minimum of 1,000
hours per
year. The Legal Services Agreement allowed the Company to benefit from
Mr.
Christensen’s extensive institutional knowledge and experience gained from
serving as our General Counsel as well as his experience representing
us as
external counsel for several years prior to joining the Company. By
mutual
agreement, the Legal Services Agreement was terminated during fiscal
2006 and
Mr. Christensen no longer provides legal services to the Company.
21.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The
Company pays the Vice-Chairman and a former Vice-Chairman of the Board of
Directors a percentage of the proceeds received for seminars that they
present.
During the fiscal years ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we expensed
charges totaling $1.6
million,
$3.0
million,
and $1.6
million,
to the Vice-Chairman and former Vice Chairman for their seminar presentations.
The Company also pays the Vice-Chairman a percentage of the royalty
proceeds
received from the sale of certain books authored by the Vice-Chairman.
During
fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, we expensed $0.2
million,
$0.5
million,
and $0.1
million
for royalty payments made to the Vice-Chairman under this agreement.
At August
31, 2006 and 2005, we had accrued $1.6
million
and $2.0
million
payable to the Vice-Chairman and former Vice-Chairman under these agreements.
These amounts were included in our accrued liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
As
part
of a preferred stock offering to a private investor, an affiliate of
the
investor, who was then a director of the Company, was named as the
Chairman of
the Board of Directors and was later elected as CEO. This individual
continues
to serve as the Company’s Chairman of the Board and CEO at August 31, 2006. In
addition, two affiliates of the private investor were named to our
Board of
Directors. In connection with the preferred stock offering, we paid
an affiliate
of the investor $0.2
million,
$0.4
million,
and $0.4
million
during fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 for monitoring fees, which are reduced
by
redemptions of outstanding Series A preferred stock.
We
pay a
son of the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, who is also an
employee of
the Company, a percentage of the royalty proceeds received from the
sales of
certain books authored by the son of the Vice-Chairman. During the
fiscal years
ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we expensed $0.3
million,
$0.2
million,
and $0.3
million
to the son of the Vice-Chairman for these royalty payments and had
$0.1
million
accrued at August 31, 2006 and 2005 as payable under the terms of this
arrangement. These amounts are included in our accrued liabilities
in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
During
fiscal 2006, we signed a non-exclusive license agreement for certain
intellectual property with a son of the Vice-Chairman of the Board
of Directors,
who was previously an officer of the Company and a member of our Board
of
Directors. We are required to pay the son of the Vice-Chairman royalties
for the
use of certain intellectual property developed by the son of Vice-Chairman.
Our
payments to the son of the Vice-Chairman totaled $0.1
million
during fiscal 2006 and the license agreement provides for minimum royalty
payments during the term of the agreement, which expires in fiscal
2011. The
license agreement may be extended by the Company for an additional
five years.
The minimum royalty payments are as follows (in thousands):
YEAR
ENDING AUGUST
31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
75
|
||
2008
|
75
|
|||
2009
|
100
|
|||
2010
|
100
|
|||
2011
|
150
|
|||
$
|
500
|
|||
Each
fiscal year of extended term
|
$
|
150
|
The
license agreement with the son of the Vice-Chairman also contains an
option to
purchase the organizational channel business at specified periods.
In fiscal
2003, we issued a separate non-exclusive license agreement for certain
intellectual property to the same son of the Vice-Chairman. The Company
received
a nominal amount to establish the license agreement and license payments
required to be paid under terms of this license agreement were insignificant
during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004.
The
Company, under a long-term agreement, leased office space in buildings
that were
owned by partnerships, the majority interest of which were owned by
the
Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors and certain other employees
and former
employees of the Company. During fiscal 2005 we exercised an option,
available
under our master lease agreement, to purchase, and simultaneously sell,
the
office facility to the current tenant, an unrelated party. The negotiated
purchase price with the landlord was $14.0
million
and the tenant agreed to purchase the property for $12.5
million.
These prices were within the range of estimated fair values of the
buildings as
determined by an independent appraisal obtained by the Company. We
paid the
difference between the sale and purchase prices, plus other closing
costs, which
were included as a component of our restructuring plan accrual (Note
15).
We
paid rent and related building expenses to the partnership totaling
$0.5
million
and $2.4
million
for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004. Following completion
of
this sale, we have no further obligations to the related
partnerships.
As
part
of a severance agreement with a former CEO, the Company offered the
former CEO
the right to purchase 121,250 shares of our common stock for $0.9
million.
In order to facilitate the purchase of these shares, we received a
non-recourse
promissory note, which was due September 2003, and bore interest at
10.0
percent. During September 2003, the former CEO declined the opportunity
to
purchase these shares and the note receivable, which was recorded as
a reduction
of shareholders’ equity at August 31, 2003, was canceled. The shares, which were
held by the Company pending the purchase of the shares, were returned
to
treasury stock during fiscal 2004.
ITEM
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial
Disclosure
|
Not
Applicable
ITEM
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized,
and
reported within the required time periods and that such information
is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for
timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
As
required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we conducted
an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of
the
effectiveness and the design and operation of our disclosure controls
and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of
August 31, 2006. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls
and
procedures were not effective as of August 31, 2006 due to the
material weakness
described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
located in Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Pursuant
to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules
and regulations
adopted pursuant thereto, the Company has included a report of
management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting
as of August 31, 2006 as part of this annual report. Our independent
registered
public accounting firm also audited, and reported on, management’s assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of August 31,
2006. Management’s report and the independent registered public accounting
firm’s report are included in Item 8 of this Report on Form
10-K.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter
ended August 31, 2006 that materially affected, or were reasonably
likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
In
November 2006, we initiated a process of identifying changes in
internal control
necessary to remediate the material weakness identified in management’s report
as of August 31, 2006. This process includes evaluation of and
prescribing
changes to processes and procedures in our accounts payable department
and with
other financial accounting personnel to ensure that accounts payable
related to
services provided are captured and recorded in the proper
period.
ITEM
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
There
was
no information to be disclosed in a current Report on Form 8-K during
fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006 that was not previously reported.
PART
III
ITEM
10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers of the
Registrant
|
Certain
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
sections
entitled “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers” in our definitive
Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders, which is scheduled
to be
held on January
19, 2007.
The
definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as
amended.
The
Board
of Directors has determined that one of the Audit Committee members,
Robert
Daines, is a “financial expert” as defined in Regulation S-K 401(h) adopted
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We
have
adopted a code of ethics for our senior financial officers that include
the
Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and other members
of the
Company’s financial leadership team. This code of ethics is available on our
website at www.franklincovey.com.
We
intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment
to, or a
waiver of, any provision of the Company’s code of ethics through filing a
current report on Form 8-K for such events if they occur.
ITEM
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
sections
entitled “Election of Directors” and “Executive Compensation” in the Company’s
definitive Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders,
which is
scheduled to be held on January
19, 2007.
ITEM
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related
Stockholder Matters
|
Plan
Category
|
[a]
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants,
and rights
|
[b]
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and
rights
|
[c]
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under
equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
[a])
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders(1)(2)
|
2,585
|
$
|
11.28
|
1,869
|
__________________________
(1) Includes
431,295 unvested stock awards which were valued at the August 31, 2006
closing
price of $5.75 per share.
(2) Excludes
performance awards issued under a shareholder approved long-term incentive
plan.
At August 31, 2006, the Company expected to award 337,588 shares of
common stock
to participants in the long-term incentive plan. The ultimate number
of shares
awarded is variable and may change between August 31, 2006 and the
vesting date
of the performance awards. For further information on our stock-based
compensation plans, refer to Note 11 to our consolidated financial
statements
presented in Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K.
The
remaining information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the
section entitled “Principal Holders of Voting Securities” in the Company’s
definitive Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders,
which is
scheduled to be held on January
19, 2007.
ITEM
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
section
entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Company’s
definitive Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders,
which is
scheduled to be held on January
19, 2007.
ITEM
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and
Services
|
The
information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
section
entitled “Selection of Auditor” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for
the annual meeting of shareholders, which is scheduled to be held on
January
19, 2007.
PART
IV
ITEM
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement
Schedules
|
(a) List
of
documents filed as part of this report:
1.
|
Financial
Statements.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon included
in the
Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year
ended August 31,
2006, are as follows:
|
Report
of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at August 31, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated
Income Statements and Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for
the years
ended August 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005,
and 2004
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended August 31, 2006, 2005,
and
2004
Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules.
|
Schedule
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (Filed as Exhibit
99.2 to
this Report on Form 10-K).
Other
financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required
or
applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial
statements or
notes thereto, or contained in this report.
3.
|
Exhibit
List.
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Exhibit
|
Incorporated
By Reference
|
Filed
Herewith
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Restatement dated March 4, 2005 amending and restating
the Company’s
Articles of Incorporation
|
(9)
|
|
3.2
|
Amendment
to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Franklin
Covey
(Appendix C)
|
(14)
|
|
3.3
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
|
(1)
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Certificate of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.05 per
share
|
(2)
|
|
4.2
|
Stockholder
Agreements, dated May 11, 1999 and June 2, 1999
|
(5)
|
|
4.3
|
Registration
Rights Agreement, dated June 2, 1999
|
(5)
|
|
4.4
|
Restated
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2005, between
the Company and
Knowledge Capital Investment Group
|
(9)
|
|
4.5
|
Restated
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2005,
between the
Company and Knowledge Capital Investment Group
|
(9)
|
|
10.1*
|
Amended
and Restated 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
(3)
|
|
10.2*
|
Amended
and Restated 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
(6)
|
|
10.3*
|
Amended
and Restated 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
(17)
|
|
10.4*
|
Amended
and Restated 1992 Stock Incentive Plan
|
(4)
|
|
10.5*
|
First
Amendment to Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Incentive
Plan
|
(18)
|
|
10.6*
|
Third
Amendment to Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Incentive
Plan
|
(19)
|
|
10.7*
|
Fifth
amendment to the Franklin Covey Co. Amended and Restated
1992 Stock
Incentive Plan (Appendix A)
|
(14)
|
|
10.8*
|
Forms
of Nonstatutory Stock Options
|
(1)
|
|
10.9
|
Lease
Agreements, as amended and proposed to be amended, by and
between Covey
Corporate Campus One, L.L.C. and Covey Corporate Campus
Two, LLC
(Landlord) and Covey Leadership Center, Inc. (Tenant) which
were assumed
by Franklin Covey Co. in the Merger with Covey Leadership,
Inc.
|
(7)
|
|
10.10*
|
Amended
and Restated Option Agreement, dated December 8, 2004,
by and between the
Company and Robert A. Whitman
|
(8)
|
|
10.11*
|
Agreement
for the Issuance of Restricted Shares, dated as of December
8, 2004, by
and between Robert A. Whitman and the Company
|
(8)
|
|
10.12*
|
Letter
Agreement regarding the cancellation of Robert A. Whitman’s Employment
Agreement, dated December 8, 2004
|
(8)
|
|
10.13
|
Restated
Monitoring Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2005, between
the Company and
Hampstead Interests, LP
|
(9)
|
|
10.14
|
Warrant,
dated March 8, 2005, to purchase 5,913,402 shares of Common
Stock issued
by the Company to Knowledge Capital Investment Group
|
(9)
|
|
10.15
|
Form
of Warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock to be issued
by the Company
to holders of Series A Preferred Stock other than Knowledge
Capital
Investment Group
|
(9)
|
|
10.16*
|
Franklin
Covey Co. 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Incentive
Plan
|
(10)
|
|
10.17*
|
The
first amendment to the Franklin Covey Co. 2004 Non-Employee
Director Stock
Incentive Plan, (Appendix B)
|
(14)
|
|
10.18*
|
Form
of Option Agreement for the 2004 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Incentive
Plan
|
(10)
|
|
10.19*
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Agreement for the 2004 Non-Employees
Directors Stock
Incentive Plan
|
(10)
|
|
10.20*
|
Separation
Agreement between the Company and Val J. Christensen, dated
March 29,
2005
|
(11)
|
|
10.21*
|
Legal
Services Agreement between the Company and Val J. Christensen,
dated March
29, 2005
|
(11)
|
|
10.22
|
Master
Lease Agreement between Franklin SaltLake LLC (Landlord)
Franklin
Development Corporation (Tenant)
|
(12)
|
|
10.23
|
Purchase
and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions between Levy
Affiliated
Holdings, LLC (Buyer) and Franklin Development Corporation
(Seller) and
Amendments
|
(12)
|
|
10.24
|
Redemption
Extension Voting Agreement between Franklin Covey Co. and
Knowledge
Capital Investment Group, dated October 20, 2005
|
(13)
|
|
10.25
|
Agreement
for Information Technology Services between each of Franklin
Covey Co.
Electronic Data Systems Corporation, and EDS Information
Services LLC,
dated April 1, 2001
|
(15)
|
|
10.26
|
Additional
Services Addendum #1 to Agreement for Information Technology
Services
between each of Franklin Covey Co. Electronic Data Systems
Corporation,
and EDS Information Services LLC, dated June 30, 2001
|
(15)
|
|
10.27
|
Amendment
#2 to Agreement for Information Technology Services between
each of
Franklin Covey Co. Electronic Data Systems Corporation,
and EDS
Information Services LLC, dated June 30, 2001
|
(15)
|
|
10.28
|
Amendment
No. 6 to the Agreement for Information Technology Services
between each of
Franklin Covey Co., Electronic Data Systems Corporation,
and EDS
Information Services L.L.C. dated April 1, 2006
|
(16)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant
|
éé
|
|
23
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
éé
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
|
éé
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
|
éé
|
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
éé
|
|
99.1
|
Report
of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,
on
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule for the years
ended August 31,
2006, 2005, and 2004
|
éé
|
|
99.2
|
Financial
Statement Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
and
Reserves.
|
éé
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
with the
Commission on April 17, 1992, Registration No.
33-47283.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
on Form S-1
filed with the Commission on May 26, 1992, Registration
No.
33-47283.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 10-K filed November 27,
1992, for the year
ended August 31, 1992.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
with the
Commission on January 3, 1994, Registration No.
33-73728.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Schedule 13D (CUSIP No. 534691090 as filed
with the
Commission on June 2, 1999).
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form S-8 filed with the Commission
on May 31,
2000, Registration No. 333-38172.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Form 10-K filed December 1, 1997, for the
year ended
August 31, 1997.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on December
14, 2005.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on March 10,
2005.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on March 25,
2005.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on April 4,
2005.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on June 27,
2005.
|
(13)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on October
24, 2005.
|
(14)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF
14A filed with the
Commission on December 12, 2005.
|
(15)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 10-Q filed July 10, 2001,
for the quarter
ended May 26, 2001.
|
(16)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission
on April 5,
2006.
|
(17)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF
14A filed with the
Commission on February 1, 2005.
|
(18)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF
14A dated November
5, 1993.
|
(19)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF
14A filed with the
Commission on December 3, 1999.
|
éé
Filed
herewith and attached to this report.
*
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
agreement.