FRANKLIN COVEY CO - Quarter Report: 2006 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For the quarterly period ended December 2, 2006
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
file no. 1-11107
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Utah
(State
of incorporation)
|
87-0401551
(I.R.S.
employer identification number)
|
|
2200
West Parkway Boulevard
Salt
Lake City, Utah
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
84119-2099
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number,
Including
area code
|
(801)
817-1776
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such, shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been, subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
o |
Accelerated
filer
|
x
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock
as of the latest practicable date:
19,718,196
shares of Common Stock as of January 2, 2007
PART
I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
December
2,
2006
|
August
31,
2006
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
22,879
|
$
|
30,587
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $1,025 and $979
|
28,422
|
24,254
|
|||||
Inventories
|
23,001
|
21,790
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,137
|
4,130
|
|||||
Other
current assets
|
7,272
|
6,359
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
85,711
|
87,120
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
34,137
|
33,318
|
|||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
78,629
|
79,532
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,423
|
4,340
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
12,577
|
12,249
|
|||||
$
|
214,477
|
$
|
216,559
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt and financing obligation
|
$
|
591
|
$
|
585
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
12,464
|
13,769
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
1,996
|
1,924
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
30,686
|
32,170
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
45,737
|
48,448
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and financing obligation, less current portion
|
33,382
|
33,559
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,257
|
1,203
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
80,376
|
83,210
|
|||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock - Series A, no par value; 4,000 shares authorized, 1,494
shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference totaling
$38,278
|
37,345
|
37,345
|
|||||
Common
stock - $0.05 par value; 40,000 shares authorized, 27,056
shares issued and outstanding
|
1,353
|
1,353
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
185,782
|
185,691
|
|||||
Common
stock warrants
|
7,611
|
7,611
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
14,557
|
14,075
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
749
|
653
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost, 7,065 and 7,083 shares
|
(113,296
|
)
|
(113,379
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
134,101
|
133,349
|
|||||
$
|
214,477
|
$
|
216,559
|
||||
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November 26,
2005
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Net
sales:
|
|||||||
Products
|
$
|
42,109
|
$
|
43,403
|
|||
Training
and consulting services
|
33,421
|
28,948
|
|||||
75,530
|
72,351
|
||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
|||||||
Products
|
18,473
|
18,664
|
|||||
Training
and consulting services
|
10,659
|
9,281
|
|||||
29,132
|
27,945
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
46,398
|
44,406
|
|||||
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
40,849
|
37,767
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
1,037
|
1,408
|
|||||
Amortization
|
902
|
1,095
|
|||||
Income
from operations
|
3,610
|
4,136
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
201
|
330
|
|||||
Interest
expense
|
(661
|
)
|
(643
|
)
|
|||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
3,150
|
3,823
|
|||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(1,734
|
)
|
(590
|
)
|
|||
Net
income
|
1,416
|
3,233
|
|||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(934
|
)
|
(1,379
|
)
|
|||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
482
|
$
|
1,854
|
|||
Net
income available to common shareholders per
share:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
.02
|
$
|
.09
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
.02
|
$
|
.09
|
|||
Weighted
average number of common shares:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
19,910
|
20,331
|
|||||
Diluted
|
20,192
|
20,642
|
|||||
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,416
|
$
|
3,233
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash used for operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,340
|
3,037
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
914
|
-
|
|||||
Share-based
compensation cost
|
119
|
77
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Increase
in accounts receivable, net
|
(4,070
|
)
|
(5,424
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in inventories
|
(1,169
|
)
|
(3,865
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
(increase) in other assets
|
(613
|
)
|
1,423
|
||||
Decrease
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(2,861
|
)
|
(4,597
|
)
|
|||
Increase
(decrease) in other long-term liabilities
|
59
|
(89
|
)
|
||||
Increase
in income taxes payable
|
73
|
39
|
|||||
Net
cash used for operating activities
|
(3,792
|
)
|
(6,166
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(2,289
|
)
|
(599
|
)
|
|||
Curriculum
development costs
|
(587
|
)
|
(702
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(2,876
|
)
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt and financing obligation
|
(147
|
)
|
(681
|
)
|
|||
Change
in restricted cash
|
-
|
699
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of common stock from treasury
|
70
|
126
|
|||||
Proceeds
from management stock loan payments
|
-
|
134
|
|||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
-
|
(10,000
|
)
|
||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
(16
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(934
|
)
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for financing activities
|
(1,027
|
)
|
(11,351
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(13
|
)
|
(44
|
)
|
|||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(7,708
|
)
|
(18,862
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
30,587
|
51,690
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$
|
22,879
|
$
|
32,828
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
668
|
$
|
673
|
|||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$
|
818
|
$
|
599
|
|||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
$
|
934
|
$
|
1,184
|
|||
Capital
lease financing of property and equipment purchases
|
-
|
109
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE
1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Franklin
Covey Co. (hereafter referred to as us, we, our, or the Company) provides
integrated consulting, training, and performance enhancement solutions to
organizations and individuals in strategy execution, productivity, leadership,
sales force effectiveness, effective communications, and other areas. Each
integrated solution may include components of training and consulting,
assessment, and other application tools that are generally available in
electronic or paper-based formats. Our products and services are available
through professional consulting services, public seminars, retail stores,
catalogs, and the internet at www.franklincovey.com.
Historically, the Company’s best-known offerings include the FranklinCovey
Planner™ and a suite of individual-effectiveness and leadership-development
training products based on the best-selling book, The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People.
We also
offer a range of training and assessment products to help organizations achieve
superior results by focusing and executing on top priorities, building the
capability of knowledge workers, and aligning business processes. These
offerings include the popular workshop FOCUS:
Achieving Your Highest Priorities™,
The
4
Disciplines of Execution™,
The
4
Roles of Leadership™,
Building
Business Acumen: What the CEO Wants You to Know™,
the
Advantage Series communication workshops, and the Execution
Quotient
(xQ™)
organizational assessment tool.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect,
in
the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results
of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. The information included
in
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
dates
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company utilizes a modified 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on August 31
of
each year. Corresponding quarterly periods generally consist of 13-week periods
that will end on December 2, 2006, March 3, 2007, and June 2, 2007 during
fiscal
2007. Under the modified 52/53-week fiscal year, the quarter ended December
2,
2006 had 5 additional business days compared to the quarter ended November
26,
2005.
The
results of operations for the quarter ended December 2, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of results expected for the entire fiscal year ending August 31,
2007.
NOTE
2 - INVENTORIES
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the
first-in, first-out method, and were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
December
2,
2006
|
August
31,
2006
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
19,332
|
$
|
18,464
|
|||
Work
in process
|
664
|
706
|
|||||
Raw
materials
|
3,005
|
2,620
|
|||||
$
|
23,001
|
$
|
21,790
|
NOTE
3 - SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The
Company has a performance based long-term incentive plan (the LTIP) that
provides for annual grants of share-based performance awards to certain
managerial personnel and executive management as directed by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. The LTIP performance awards cliff vest
at
the completion of a three-year performance period that begins on September
1 in
the fiscal year of the grant. The number of common shares that are finally
awarded to LTIP participants is variable and is based entirely upon the
achievement of a combination of performance objectives related to sales growth
and cumulative operating income during the three-year performance period.
During
the quarter ended December 2, 2006, the Compensation Committee granted
performance awards for 429,312 shares (the Target Award) of common stock
under
terms of the LTIP. The number of common shares finally awarded will range
from
zero shares, if a minimum level of performance is not achieved, to 200 percent
of the Target Award, if specifically defined performance criteria is achieved
during the three-year performance period. The fiscal 2007 LTIP award was
valued
at $5.78 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock on the
grant
date, and we will record compensation expense over the vesting period using
a
five percent estimated forfeiture rate. The corresponding estimated compensation
cost of the fiscal 2007 LTIP award is currently $2.5 million, which is expected
to be expensed over the remaining service period of the award, which ends
on
August 31, 2009.
Due
to
the variable number of common shares that may be issued under the LTIP, we
reevaluate our LTIP grants on a quarterly basis and adjust the number of
shares
expected to be awarded based upon financial results of the Company as compared
to the performance goals set for the award. Adjustments to the number of
shares
awarded, and to the corresponding compensation expense, are made on a cumulative
basis at the date of adjustment based upon the estimated probable number
of
common shares to be awarded. Based upon actual financial performance through
December 2, 2006 and estimated performance through the remaining service
period
of the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant (fiscal 2007 and 2008), the number of performance
awards granted during fiscal 2006 was reduced to 213,946 shares, which resulted
in a cumulative adjustment (reduction) to our operating expenses of $0.2
million in the quarter ended December 2, 2006. At December 2, 2006, there
was
$1.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to our fiscal
2006
LTIP grant, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining service
period
of the award.
NOTE
4 - INCOME TAXES
In
order
to determine our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated
annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income and
statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain
significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter during
which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax
rates
from quarter to quarter.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that it was appropriate
to
reverse substantially all of the valuation allowances on our deferred income
tax
assets. Prior to the reversal of these valuation allowances, our income tax
provisions were affected by reductions in our deferred income tax valuation
allowance as we utilized net operating loss carryforwards. Accordingly, our
income tax provision increased from $0.6 million the first quarter of fiscal
2006 to $1.7 million for the quarter ended December 2, 2006. Our effective
tax
rate for the quarter ended December 2, 2006 of approximately 55 percent was
higher than statutory combined rates primarily due to the accrual of taxable
interest income on the management stock loan program and withholding taxes
on
royalty income from foreign licensees.
NOTE
5 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive
income is based on net income and includes charges and credits to equity
accounts that are not the result of transactions with shareholders.
Comprehensive income for the Company was calculated as follows (in
thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,416
|
$
|
3,233
|
|||
Other
comprehensive income (loss) items net of tax:
|
|||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
96
|
(365
|
)
|
||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
1,512
|
$
|
2,868
|
NOTE
6 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income available
to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income
available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares
outstanding plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using the
treasury stock method or the “as converted” method, as appropriate. Due to
modifications to our management stock loan program made during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that the shares of management stock
loan
participants which were placed in the escrow account are participating
securities as defined by EITF Issue 03-6, Participating
Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.
128,
because
they continue to have equivalent common stock dividend rights. Accordingly,
these management stock loan shares are included in our Basic EPS calculation
during periods of net income and excluded from the Basic EPS calculation
in
periods of net loss.
The
following table presents the computation of our EPS for the periods indicated
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,416
|
$
|
3,233
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(934
|
)
|
(1,379
|
)
|
|||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
482
|
$
|
1,854
|
|||
Denominator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
19,910
|
20,331
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||
Stock
options
|
35
|
46
|
|||||
Unvested
stock awards
|
247
|
265
|
|||||
Performance
awards(2)
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock warrants(2)
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Diluted
weighted average shares outstanding
|
20,192
|
20,642
|
|||||
Basic
and diluted EPS:
|
|||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$
|
.02
|
$
|
.09
|
|||
Diluted
EPS
|
$
|
.02
|
$
|
.09
|
(1) | Since the Company recognized net income for the quarter ended December 2, 2006, basic weighted average shares for that period includes 3.5 million shares of common stock held by management stock loan participants that were placed in escrow. | |
(2) | For the quarter ended December 2, 2006, conversion of LTIP performance awards and common stock warrants is not assumed because such conversion would be anti-dilutive (see table below). |
The
following table sets forth the securities not included in the calculation
of
diluted EPS because to do so would be anti-dilutive (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
Performance
awards
|
643
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock warrants
|
6,239
|
6,239
|
|||||
6,882
|
6,239
|
At
December 2, 2006 and November 26, 2005, we had approximately 2.0 million
stock
options outstanding which were not included in the computation of diluted
EPS
because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price
of the Company’s common shares for the respective periods. Although these shares
were not included in our calculation of diluted EPS, these stock options
may
have a dilutive effect on the Company’s EPS calculation in future periods if the
price of our common stock increases.
NOTE
7 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company has two segments: the Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU) and
the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit (OSBU). The following is a description
of
our segments, their primary operating components, and their significant business
activities:
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit - This
business unit is primarily focused on sales to individual customers and small
business organizations and includes the results of our domestic retail stores,
consumer direct operations (primarily catalog, eCommerce, and public seminars
programs), wholesale operations, international product channels in certain
countries, and other related distribution channels, including government
product
sales and domestic printing and publishing sales. The CSBU results of operations
also include the financial results of our paper planner manufacturing
operations. Although CSBU sales primarily consist of products such as planners,
binders, software, totes, and handheld electronic planning devices, virtually
any component of our leadership, productivity, and strategy execution solutions
may be purchased through our CSBU channels.
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit - The
OSBU
is primarily responsible for the development, marketing, sale, and delivery
of
strategic execution, productivity, leadership, sales force performance, and
communication training and consulting solutions directly to organizational
clients, including other companies, the government, and educational
institutions. The OSBU includes the financial results of our domestic sales
force and certain international operations. The domestic sales force is
responsible for the sale and delivery of our training and consulting services
in
the United States. Our international sales group includes the financial results
of our directly owned foreign offices and royalty revenues from
licensees.
The
Company’s chief operating decision maker is the CEO, and each of the segments
has a president who reports directly to the CEO. The primary measurement
tool
used in business unit performance analysis is earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), which may not be calculated as
similarly titled amounts calculated by other companies. For segment reporting
purposes, the Company’s consolidated EBITDA can be calculated as its income from
operations excluding depreciation and amortization charges.
In
the
normal course of business, the Company may make structural and cost allocation
revisions to its segment information to reflect new reporting responsibilities
within the organization. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we transferred
the international product channels in certain countries from OSBU to CSBU
and
made other less significant organizational changes. All prior period segment
information has been revised to conform to the most recent classifications
and
organizational changes. The Company accounts for its segment information
on the
same basis as the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
December
2, 2006
|
Sales
to External Customers
|
Gross
Profit
|
EBITDA
|
Depreciation
|
Amortization
|
|||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
14,127
|
$
|
8,399
|
$
|
1,198
|
$
|
191
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
19,936
|
12,279
|
9,992
|
24
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
4,577
|
2,778
|
2,663
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
2,386
|
1,485
|
486
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,296
|
(256
|
)
|
(9,461
|
)
|
259
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
42,322
|
24,685
|
4,878
|
474
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
17,721
|
11,421
|
359
|
110
|
902
|
|||||||||||
International
|
15,487
|
10,292
|
3,187
|
205
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
33,208
|
21,713
|
3,546
|
315
|
902
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
75,530
|
46,398
|
8,424
|
789
|
902
|
|||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(2,875
|
)
|
248
|
-
|
||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
75,530
|
$
|
46,398
|
$
|
5,549
|
$
|
1,037
|
$
|
902
|
||||||
Quarter
Ended
November
26, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
14,643
|
$
|
8,677
|
$
|
374
|
$
|
436
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
19,177
|
11,678
|
9,537
|
12
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
6,111
|
2,801
|
2,657
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
2,644
|
1,741
|
879
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,163
|
378
|
(8,387
|
)
|
348
|
57
|
||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
43,738
|
25,275
|
5,060
|
796
|
57
|
|||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
16,330
|
10,569
|
437
|
85
|
1,036
|
|||||||||||
International
|
12,283
|
8,562
|
3,069
|
331
|
2
|
|||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
28,613
|
19,131
|
3,506
|
416
|
1,038
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
72,351
|
44,406
|
8,566
|
1,212
|
1,095
|
|||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(1,927
|
)
|
196
|
-
|
||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
72,351
|
$
|
44,406
|
$
|
6,639
|
$
|
1,408
|
$
|
1,095
|
||||||
A
reconciliation of operating segment EBITDA to consolidated income before
taxes
is provided below (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
Reportable
segment EBITDA
|
$
|
8,424
|
$
|
8,566
|
|||
Corporate
expenses
|
(2,875
|
)
|
(1,927
|
)
|
|||
Consolidated
EBITDA
|
5,549
|
6,639
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
(1,037
|
)
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|||
Amortization
|
(902
|
)
|
(1,095
|
)
|
|||
Income
from operations
|
3,610
|
4,136
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
201
|
330
|
|||||
Interest
expense
|
(661
|
)
|
(643
|
)
|
|||
Income
before taxes
|
$
|
3,150
|
$
|
3,823
|
NOTE
8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In
August
2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations to improve
our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our
printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing service
sales. Our reconfiguration plan includes moving our printing operations a
short
distance from its existing location to our corporate headquarters campus
and the
sale of the manufacturing facility and certain printing presses. Other existing
presses will be moved to the new location as part of the reconfiguration
plan.
Because the manufacturing facility and printing presses were not available
for
immediate sale as defined by SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
these
assets were not classified as held for sale in our condensed consolidated
balance sheet at December 2, 2006.
Subsequent
to December 2, 2006, we completed the sale of the manufacturing facility.
The
sale price was $2.5 million and, after deducting customary closing costs,
the
net proceeds to the Company from the sale totaled $2.3 million in cash. The
carrying value of the manufacturing facility at December 2, 2006 was $1.1
million and we expect to recognize a gain of $1.2 million when the accounting
requirements are met to record the completion of the sale.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Management’s
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements
are
based upon management’s current expectations and are subject to various
uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Important factors that could
cause
actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking
statements are set forth below under the heading “Safe Harbor Statement Under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.”
The
Company suggests that the following discussion and analysis be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Our
first
fiscal quarter, which includes the months of September, October, and November,
has historically reflected good product sales, from back-to-school and early
holiday shopping, and generally good training and consulting service sales.
Due
to our modified 52/53 week fiscal calendar, the quarter ended December 2,
2006
included the financial results of 5 additional business days compared to
the
quarter ended November 26, 2005. For the quarter ended December 2, 2006,
our
income from operations decreased to $3.6 million compared to $4.1 million
in the
first fiscal quarter of the prior year and our pre-tax income declined to
$3.2
million compared to $3.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Due
to an
increase in our effective tax rate, which was partially offset by reduced
preferred stock dividends, our net income available to common shareholders
decreased to $0.5 million compared to $1.9 million in the first quarter of
fiscal 2006.
The
primary factors that influenced our operating results for the quarter ended
December 2, 2006 were as follows:
·
|
Sales
- Our
sales performance for both training and consulting services and
product
sales was favorably impacted by 5 additional business days in the
first
quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the first quarter of the prior
year.
Training and consulting services sales increased $4.5 million primarily
due to increased international sales, increased domestic sales
of
The
7 Habits of Highly Effective People training
programs, and improved sales effectiveness training sales. Product
sales
declined $1.3 million primarily due to reduced wholesale sales
and reduced
retail sales resulting from 16 fewer retail stores being open during
the
quarter compared to the prior year. Partially offsetting these
declines
were improved sales through our internet site at www.franklincovey.com.
As a result of these factors, our total sales increased by $3.2
million,
or 4 percent, compared to the corresponding quarter of fiscal
2006.
|
·
|
Gross
Profit
-
When compared to the prior year, our gross profit increased primarily
due
to increased sales. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross
profit
in terms of a percentage of sales, remained consistent at 61.4
percent of
sales in the first quarter of both fiscal 2007 and fiscal
2006.
|
·
|
Operating
Costs
-
Our operating costs increased by $2.5 million compared to the prior
year,
which was the result of increased selling, general, and administrative
expenses totaling $3.1 million, a $0.4 million decrease in depreciation
expense, and a $0.2 million decrease in amortization expense.
|
·
|
Income
Tax Provision
-
Our income tax provision for the quarter ended December 2, 2006
increased
to $1.7 million compared to $0.6 million in the first quarter of
fiscal
2006. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that
it was
appropriate to reverse substantially all of the valuation allowances
on
our deferred income tax assets. Prior to the reversal of these
valuation
allowances, our income tax provisions were affected by reductions
in our
deferred income tax valuation allowance as we utilized net operating
loss
carryforwards. Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended December
2,
2006 of approximately 55 percent was higher than statutory combined
rates
primarily due to the accrual of taxable interest income on the
management
stock loan program and withholding taxes on royalty income from
foreign
licensees.
|
·
|
Preferred
Stock Dividends -
Due to preferred stock redemptions in the first two quarters of
fiscal
2006 totaling $20.0 million, our preferred stock dividends decreased
by
$0.4 million compared to the first quarter of fiscal
2006.
|
Further
details regarding these factors and their impact on our operating results
and
liquidity are provided throughout the following management’s discussion and
analysis.
Quarter
Ended December 2, 2006 Compared to the Quarter Ended November 26,
2005
Sales
The
following table sets forth sales data by category and for our operating segments
(in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
||||||||||
December
2, 2006
|
November
26, 2005
|
Percent
Change
|
||||||||
Sales
by Category:
|
||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
42,109
|
$
|
43,403
|
(3
|
)
|
||||
Training
and consulting services
|
33,421
|
28,948
|
15
|
|||||||
$
|
75,530
|
$
|
72,351
|
4
|
||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||
Retail
Stores
|
$
|
14,127
|
$
|
14,643
|
(4
|
)
|
||||
Consumer
Direct
|
19,936
|
19,177
|
4
|
|||||||
Wholesale
|
4,577
|
6,111
|
(25
|
)
|
||||||
CSBU
International
|
2,386
|
2,644
|
(10
|
)
|
||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,296
|
1,163
|
11
|
|||||||
42,322
|
43,738
|
(3
|
)
|
|||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||
Domestic
|
17,721
|
16,330
|
9
|
|||||||
International
|
15,487
|
12,283
|
26
|
|||||||
33,208
|
28,613
|
16
|
||||||||
Total
Sales
|
$
|
75,530
|
$
|
72,351
|
4
|
Product
Sales
- Overall
product sales, which primarily consist of planners, binders, totes, software,
and handheld electronic planning devices that are primarily sold through
our
Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU) channels, declined $1.3 million,
or 3
percent, compared to the prior year. The decline in product sales was primarily
due to the following performance in our CSBU channels:
·
|
Retail
Stores
-
The decline in retail sales was primarily due to fewer stores,
which had a
$1.6 million impact on sales, and reduced demand for technology
and
related products, which declined $0.2 million compared to the prior
year.
Partially offsetting these declines were increased sales resulting
from
additional business days during the quarter and increased demand
for
“core” products (e.g. planners, binders, forms, and totes). At December
2,
2006, we were operating 89 retail stores compared to 105 stores
at
November 26, 2005 and based upon our continuing analyses of retail
store
performance, we may close additional retail stores and continue
to
recognize decreases in sales as a result of closing stores in future
periods. With the additional business days included, comparable
store
(stores which were open during the comparable periods) sales increased
9
percent compared to the same quarter of the prior year. However,
excluding
the additional business days, comparable store sales declined by
2 percent
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct
-
Sales through our consumer direct channels (primarily catalog,
eCommerce,
and public seminars) increased primarily due to increased sales
through
our internet channel and increased public seminar sales, which
were
partially offset by decreased government depot sales and decreased
catalog
channel sales. We believe that the transition of customers from
our
catalog and other product channels to our online web site is consistent
with general market trends toward increased internet shopping and
we
expect our internet sales to continue to grow in future periods.
Public
program sales increased due to an increase in the number of seminar
participants and an increased number of programs given compared
to the
prior year. Sales through government depots decreased due to a
decision by
the government to discontinue sales of dated paper products through
these
stores.
|
·
|
Wholesale
-
Sales through our wholesale channel, which includes sales to office
superstores and other retail chains, decreased $1.5 million primarily
due
to reduced demand for our products from one of our wholesale customers
during the quarter.
|
·
|
CSBU
International -
This channel includes the product sales of our directly owned
international offices in Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and
Australia. The $0.3 million decline was primarily due to product
sales
declines in the United Kingdom and Canada. We separated the product
sales
operations from the Organizational Solutions Business Unit in these
international locations during the quarter ended December 2, 2006
to
utilize existing product sales and marketing expertise to improve
overall
product sales performance at these offices.
|
·
|
Other
CSBU
-
Other CSBU sales consist primarily of domestic printing and publishing
sales and building sublease revenues. The increase in other CSBU
sales was
primarily due to increased sublease revenue from new lease contracts
obtained in late fiscal 2006 and increased external printing
sales.
|
Training
and Consulting Services
- We
offer
a variety of training courses, training related products, and consulting
services focused on productivity, leadership, strategy execution, sales force
performance, and effective communications training programs that are provided
both domestically and internationally through the Organizational Solutions
Business Unit (OSBU). Our overall training and consulting service sales
increased $4.5 million, or 15 percent, compared to the same quarter of the
prior
year. Training and consulting service sales performance during the quarter
was
primarily attributable to the following factors in our OSBU
divisions:
·
|
Domestic
- Our
domestic training sales increased by $1.4 million, or 9 percent,
primarily
due to additional business days resulting in increased sales of
The
Seven Habits of Highly Effective People and
increased training effectiveness sales. Sales performance improved
in
nearly all of our domestic regions and our booked days delivered
increased
over the prior year. Our current outlook for fiscal 2007 remains
strong
and current training days booked for training in fiscal 2007 has
increased
compared to the prior fiscal year.
|
·
|
International
-
International sales increased $3.2 million, or 26 percent, compared
to the
prior year. Sales increased over the prior year at all of our directly
owned foreign offices, which are located in Japan, Canada, the
United
Kingdom, Mexico, Brazil, and Australia, as well as from licensee
royalty
revenues. The translation of foreign sales to United States dollars
resulted in a $0.1 million favorable impact to our consolidated
sales as
certain foreign currencies strengthened against the United States
dollar
during the quarter ended December 2,
2006.
|
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit consists of net sales less the cost of goods sold or the cost of services
provided. Our overall gross margin, which is gross profit stated in terms
of a
percentage of sales, remained consistent with the prior year at 61.4 percent
of
sales. Although gross margin on product sales decreased slightly to 56.1
percent
compared to 57.0 percent in fiscal 2006, training and consulting service
sales,
which typically have higher gross margins than product sales, increased to
44.2
percent of total consolidated sales compared to 40.0 percent of total
consolidated sales in the prior year.
For
the
quarter ended December 2, 2006, our training and consulting services gross
margin was 68.1 percent compared to 67.9 percent in the prior year.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General and Administrative
- Our
selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $3.1 million,
or 8 percent, compared to the prior year. The increase in SG&A expenses was
primarily due to 1) the impact of additional business days on associate costs,
2) increased audit and consulting costs resulting from compliance with Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX); and 3) increased promotional
and
advertising costs. Due to the 5 additional business days included in the
first
quarter of fiscal 2007, we incurred an additional $1.5 million of associate
costs, including payroll and related benefits. Due to our fiscal calendar,
our
first quarter of fiscal 2007 has 5 additional business days and includes
the
additional associate costs compared to the prior year. Accordingly, our fourth
quarter will have 5 less business days and associated costs in fiscal 2007
than
in fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2006, we were required to comply with Section
404
of SOX, which resulted in $1.0 million of additional auditing and consulting
fees that were incurred and expensed during the quarter ended December 2,
2006.
We also incurred $0.4 million of increased catalog and promotion costs resulting
from additional marketing efforts designed to improve sales.
We
are
not satisfied with current levels of selling, general, and administrative
expenses and are pursuing numerous cost reduction strategies designed to
control
costs and bring spending in line with desired business models. While we believe
that these efforts will be successful in reducing our operating expenses,
the
success of these initiatives is dependent upon numerous factors, many of
which
are not within our control. Due to the time necessary to implement these
cost
reduction strategies, we may not be able to implement these new initiatives
quickly enough to have a significant impact upon our fiscal 2007 operating
results.
Depreciation
and Amortization
- Depreciation
expense decreased $0.4 million, or 26 percent, compared to the same quarter
of
fiscal 2006 primarily due to the full depreciation or disposal of certain
property and equipment (including retail stores) and the effects of
significantly reduced capital expenditures during preceding fiscal years.
Based
upon these events and current capital spending trends, we expect that
depreciation expense for fiscal 2007 will approximate total fiscal 2006
depreciation expense.
Amortization
expense from definite-lived intangible assets totaled $0.9 million for the
quarter ended December 2, 2006 compared to $1.1 million in the prior year.
We
expect intangible asset amortization expense to total $3.6 million for fiscal
2007.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historically,
our primary sources of capital have been net cash provided by operating
activities, line-of-credit financing, long-term borrowings, asset sales,
and the
issuance of preferred and common stock. We currently rely primarily upon
cash
flows from operating activities and cash on hand to maintain adequate liquidity
and working capital levels. Although our first fiscal quarter generally produces
profitable operations, we commonly use cash for operating activities during
the
quarter as we pay seasonally high August 31 (fiscal year end) accrued
liabilities and accounts payable and purchase inventory items for sale during
our seasonally busy product-sale months of November, December, and January.
At
December 2, 2006, we had $22.9 million of cash and cash equivalents compared
to
$30.6 million at August 31, 2006. Our net working capital (current assets
less
current liabilities) increased to $40.0 million at December 2, 2006 compared
to
$38.7 million at August 31, 2006.
The
following discussion is a description of the primary factors affecting our
cash
flows and their effects upon our liquidity and capital resources during the
quarter ended December 2, 2006.
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
During
the quarter ended December 2, 2006, our net cash used for operating activities
totaled $3.8 million compared to $6.2 million for the same period of the
prior
year. Our primary source of cash from operating activities was the sale of
goods
and services to our customers in the normal course of business. The primary
uses
of cash for operating activities were payments to suppliers for materials
used
in products sold, payments for direct costs necessary to conduct training
programs, and payments for selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Cash
used for changes in working capital during the first quarter of fiscal 2007
was
primarily related to 1) increased accounts receivable balances resulting
from
improved OSBU sales; 2) payments made to reduce accrued liabilities and accounts
payable from seasonally high August 31 balances; and 3) purchases of inventory
items for our seasonally busy product sales months of November, December,
and
January. We believe that our continued efforts to optimize working capital
balances, combined with existing and planned sales growth programs and
cost-cutting initiatives, will improve our cash flows from operating activities
in future periods. However, the success of these efforts, and their eventual
contribution to our cash flows, is dependent upon numerous factors, many
of
which are not within our control.
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities and Capital Expenditures
Net
cash
used for investing activities totaled $2.9 million for the first quarter
of
fiscal 2007. Our primary use of cash for investing activities was the purchase
of property and equipment, which consisted primarily of payments for new
printing presses, computer hardware, and computer software, which totaled
$2.3
million. Additionally, we spent $0.6 million for further investment in
curriculum development, primarily related to new leadership and execution
offerings.
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
Net
cash
used for financing activities during the quarter ended December 2, 2006 totaled
$1.0 million. Our principal uses of cash for financing activities during
this
period were the payment of preferred stock dividends totaling $0.9 million
and
principal payments totaling $0.1 million on our long-term debt and financing
obligation.
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company has not structured any special purpose or variable interest entities,
or
participated in any commodity trading activities, which would expose us to
potential undisclosed liabilities or create adverse consequences to our
liquidity. Required contractual payments primarily consist of payments to
EDS
for outsourcing services related to information systems, warehousing and
distribution, and call center operations; payments on a financing obligation
resulting from the sale of our corporate campus; minimum rent payments for
retail store and sales office space; cash payments for Series A preferred
stock
dividends; mortgage payments on certain buildings and property; cash payments
for new printing services equipment to be installed in fiscal 2007; short-term
purchase obligations for inventory items; and monitoring fees paid to a Series
A
preferred stock investor. There have been no significant changes to our expected
required contractual obligations from those disclosed at August 31,
2006.
Other
Items
Management
Common Stock Loan Program
- The
Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow
certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of our common
stock. For further information regarding our management common stock loan
program, refer to Note 9 in our consolidated financial statements on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. The inability of the Company to
collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse impact
upon our financial position and future cash flows compared to full collection
of
the loans.
Availability
of Future Capital Resources
- Going
forward, we will continue to incur costs necessary for the operation of the
business. We anticipate using cash on hand, cash provided by operating
activities, on the condition that we can continue generating positive cash
flows
from operations, and other financing alternatives, if necessary, for these
expenditures. We anticipate that our existing capital resources should be
adequate to enable us to maintain our operations for at least the upcoming
twelve months. However, our ability to maintain adequate capital for our
operations in the future is dependent upon a number of factors, including
sales
trends, our ability to contain costs, levels of capital expenditures, collection
of accounts receivable, and other factors. Some of the factors that influence
our operations are not within our control, such as economic conditions and
the
introduction of new technology and products by our competitors. We will continue
to monitor our liquidity position and may pursue additional financing
alternatives, if required, to maintain sufficient resources for future operating
and capital requirements. However, there can be no assurance such financing
alternatives will be available to us on acceptable terms.
USE
OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant
accounting polices that we used to prepare our consolidated financial statements
are outlined in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, which are
presented in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2006. Some of those accounting policies require us
to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Management regularly evaluates its estimates and
assumptions and bases those estimates and assumptions on historical experience,
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and
requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States
of America. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions, including changes in economic conditions and other
circumstances that are not in our control, but which may have an impact on
these
estimates and our actual financial results.
The
following items require significant judgment and often involve complex
estimates:
Revenue
Recognition
We
derive
revenues primarily from the following sources:
·
|
Products
-
We sell planners, binders, planner accessories, handheld electronic
devices, and other related products that are primarily sold through
our
CSBU channels.
|
·
|
Training
and Consulting Services
-
We provide training and consulting services to both organizations
and
individuals in strategic execution, leadership, productivity, goal
alignment, sales force performance, and communication effectiveness
skills. These training programs and services are primarily sold
through
our OSBU channels.
|
The
Company recognizes revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists,
2) delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered, 3) the
price
to the customer is fixed and determinable, and 4) collectibility is reasonably
assured. For product sales, these conditions are generally met upon shipment
of
the product to the customer or by completion of the sale transaction in a
retail
store. For training and service sales, these conditions are generally met
upon
presentation of the training seminar or delivery of the consulting
services.
Some
of
our training and consulting contracts contain multiple deliverable elements
that
include training along with other products and services. In accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Accounting
for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,
sales
arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of
accounting if the deliverables in the sales contract meet the following
criteria: 1) the delivered training or product has value to the client on
a
standalone basis; 2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair
value
of undelivered items; and 3) delivery of any undelivered item is probable.
The
overall contract consideration is allocated among the separate units of
accounting based upon their fair values, with the amount allocated to the
delivered item being limited to the amount that is not contingent upon the
delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions.
If the fair value of all undelivered elements exits, but fair value does
not
exist for one or more delivered elements, the residual method is used. Under
the
residual method, the amount of consideration allocated to the delivered items
equals the total contract consideration less the aggregate fair value of
the
undelivered items. Fair value of the undelivered items is based upon the
normal
pricing practices for the Company’s existing training programs, consulting
services, and other products, which are generally the prices of the items
when
sold separately.
Revenue
is recognized on software sales in accordance with Statement of Position
(SOP)
97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition as
amended by SOP 98-09. SOP 97-2, as amended, generally requires revenue earned
on
software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software products
and
support to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair value
of the
elements based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE). The majority
of the
Company’s software sales have elements, including a license and post contract
customer support (PCS). Currently the Company does not have VSOE for either
the
license or support elements of its software sales. Accordingly, revenue is
deferred until the only undelivered element is PCS and the total arrangement
fee
is recognized ratably over the support period.
Our
international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where we
do
not have a directly-owned operation. Licensee companies are unrelated entities
that have been granted a license to translate the Company’s content and
curriculum, adapt the content and curriculum to the local culture, and sell
the
Company’s training seminars and products in a specific country or region.
Licensees are required to pay us royalties based upon a percentage of the
licensee’s sales. We recognize royalty income each period based upon the sales
information reported to us by the licensee.
Revenue
is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated
amounts
for discounts and product returns.
Share-Based
Compensation
During
fiscal 2006, we granted performance based compensation awards to certain
employees in a Board of Director approved long-term incentive plan (the LTIP).
These performance based share awards allow each participant the right to
receive
a certain number of shares of common stock based upon the achievement of
specified financial goals at the end of a predetermined performance period.
The
LTIP awards vest on August 31 of the third fiscal year from the grant date,
which corresponds to the completion of a three-year performance cycle. For
example, the LTIP awards granted in fiscal 2007 vest on August 31, 2009.
The
number of shares that are finally awarded to LTIP participants is variable
and
is based entirely upon the achievement of a combination of performance
objectives related to sales growth and cumulative operating income during
the
performance period. Due to the variable number of shares that may be issued
under the LTIP, we reevaluate the LTIP grants on a quarterly basis and adjust
the number of shares expected to be awarded for each grant based upon financial
results of the Company as compared to the performance goals set for the award.
Adjustments to the number of shares awarded, and to the corresponding
compensation expense, are based upon estimated future performance and are
made
on a cumulative basis at the date of adjustment based upon the probable number
of shares to be awarded.
The
Compensation Committee initially granted awards for 378,665 shares (the Target
Award) of common stock under the LTIP during fiscal 2006. However, the actual
number of shares finally awarded will range from zero shares, if a minimum
level
of performance is not achieved, to 200 percent of the target award, if
specifically defined performance criteria is achieved during the three-year
performance period. The minimum sales growth necessary for participants to
receive any shares under the fiscal 2006 LTIP is 7.5 percent and the minimum
cumulative operating income is $36.2 million. The number of shares finally
awarded to LTIP participants under the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant is based upon
the
combination of factors as shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
30.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
22.5%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
15.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
11.8
%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
7.5%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$36.20
|
$56.80
|
$72.30
|
$108.50
|
$144.60
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
Based
upon actual financial performance through December 2, 2006 and estimated
performance through the remaining service period of the fiscal 2006 LTIP
grant
(fiscal 2007 and 2008), the number of performance awards granted during fiscal
2006 was reduced to 213,946 shares, which resulted in a cumulative adjustment
to
reduce our operating expenses by $0.2 million in the quarter ended
December 2, 2006. At December 2, 2006, there was $1.0 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to our fiscal 2006 LTIP grant. The
total
compensation cost of the fiscal 2006 LTIP will be equal to the number of
shares
finally issued multiplied by $6.60 per share, which was the fair value of
the
common shares determined at the grant date.
During
the quarter ended December 2, 2006, the Compensation Committee granted
performance awards for 429,312 shares of common stock under terms of the
LTIP.
The fiscal 2007 LTIP award was valued at $5.78 per share, which was the closing
price of our common stock on the grant date. Consistent with the fiscal 2006
LTIP grant, the Company must achieve minimum levels of sales growth and
cumulative operating income in order for participants to receive any shares
under the LTIP grant. The minimum sales growth for the fiscal 2007 LTIP is
10.0
percent (fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2006) and the minimum cumulative
operating income total is $41.3 million. We will record compensation expense
using a 5 percent estimated forfeiture rate during the vesting period. However,
the total amount of compensation expense recorded for the fiscal 2007 LTIP
will
equal the number of shares awarded multiplied by $5.78 per share. The number
of
shares finally awarded to LTIP participants under the fiscal 2007 LTIP grant
is
based upon the combination of factors as shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
40.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
30.0%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
20.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
15.7%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
10.0%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$41.30
|
$64.90
|
$82.60
|
$123.90
|
$165.20
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
The
evaluation of LTIP performance awards and corresponding use of estimated
amounts
may produce additional volatility in our consolidated financial statements
as we
record cumulative adjustments to the estimated number of common shares to
be
awarded under the LTIP grants. Actual results could differ from estimates
made
during the service, or vesting, period.
We
estimate the value of our stock option awards on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. However, the Company did not grant any
stock
options in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 or in fiscal years 2006 and 2005.
At
December 2, 2006 the remaining cost associated with our unvested stock options
was insignificant.
Accounts
Receivable Valuation
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate
of
the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts receivable
balance. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical
write-off experience and current economic conditions and we review the adequacy
of our allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis. Receivable balances
past due over 90 days, which exceed a specified dollar amount, are reviewed
individually for collectibility. Account balances are charged off against
the
allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the probability
for recovery is considered remote. We do not have any off-balance sheet credit
exposure related to our customers.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. Our inventories are comprised primarily of dated
calendar products and other non-dated products such as binders, handheld
electronic devices, stationery, training products, and other accessories.
Provision is made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated
net realizable value. In assessing the realization of inventories, we make
judgments regarding future demand requirements and compare these assessments
with current and committed inventory levels. Inventory requirements may change
based on projected customer demand, technological and product life cycle
changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors
that
could affect the valuation of our inventories.
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized, but
rather
are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or
circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey trade
name
intangible asset has been deemed to have an indefinite life. This intangible
asset is assigned to the OSBU and is tested for impairment using the present
value of estimated royalties on trade name related revenues, which consist
primarily of training seminars, international licensee royalties, and related
products. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability
of our
indefinite-lived intangible asset change in the future, significant impairment
charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations
and
financial condition. Based upon our fiscal 2006 evaluation, our trade-name
related revenues and licensee royalties would have to suffer significant
reductions before we would be required to impair the Covey trade
name.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate
of
undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over the remaining useful
lives
in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is recoverable. If
the
carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows of
the
assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the
carrying values of the assets and their estimated fair values. Impairment
of
long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there are
identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets.
The
evaluation of long-lived assets requires us to use estimates of future cash
flows. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of
our
long-lived tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in the future,
significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
Income
Taxes
The
Company regularly evaluates United States federal and various state and foreign
jurisdiction income tax exposures. The tax benefits of tax exposure items
are
not recognized in the provision for income taxes unless it is probable that
the
benefits will be sustained, without regard to the likelihood of tax examination.
A tax exposure reserve represents the difference between the recognition
of
benefits related to exposure items for income tax reporting purposes and
financial reporting purposes. The tax exposure reserve is classified as a
component of the current income taxes payable account. The Company adds interest
and penalties, if applicable, each period to the reserve.
The
Company recognizes the benefits of the tax exposure items in the financial
statements, that is, the reserve is reversed, when it becomes probable that
the
tax position will be sustained. To assess the probability of sustaining a
tax
position, the Company considers all available positive evidence. In many
instances, sufficient positive evidence will not be available until the
expiration of the statute of limitations for Internal Revenue Service audits,
at
which time the entire benefit will be recognized as a discrete item in the
applicable period.
The
calculation of our income tax provision or benefit, as applicable, requires
estimates of future taxable income or losses. During the course of the fiscal
year, these estimates are compared to actual financial results and adjustments
may be made to our tax provision or benefit to reflect these revised
estimates.
The
Company continually assesses the need for valuation allowances against its
deferred income tax assets, considering recent profitability, known trends
and
events, and expected future transactions. For several years prior to the
year
ended August 31, 2006, our history of significant operating losses precluded
us
from demonstrating that it was more likely than not that the related benefits
from deferred income tax deductions and foreign tax carryforwards would be
realized. Accordingly, we recorded valuation allowances on the majority of
our
deferred income tax assets.
In
fiscal
2006 we reversed the majority of these valuation allowances. Due to improved
operating performance, business models, and expectations regarding future
taxable income, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not
that
the benefits of domestic operating loss carryforwards, together with the
benefits of other deferred income tax assets will be realized. Thus, we reversed
the valuation allowances on certain of our domestic deferred income tax assets,
except for $2.2 million related to foreign tax credits.
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Sales
Tax Presentation
- In
June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-03, How
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should
Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net
Presentation).
This
consensus provides that the presentation of taxes assessed by a governmental
authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between
a
seller and a customer on either a gross basis (included in revenues and costs)
or on a net basis (excluded from revenues) is an accounting policy decision
that
should be disclosed. The provisions of EITF 06-03 become effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company
is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting EITF 06-03 on the presentation
of
our consolidated financial statements and we will adopt the provisions of
EITF
06-03 in our fiscal quarter ending June 2, 2007.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
- In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109.
This
interpretation prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement
standard, as well as criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing,
and
measuring tax positions for financial statement purposes. This interpretation
also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainties as they
relate to income tax accounting and is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect from the adoption of FIN No.
48,
if any, will be an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the year
of
adoption. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN No. 48 on September
1,
2007 (fiscal 2008). We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact
of
FIN No. 48 on our financial statements.
Evaluation
of Misstatements
- In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements,
which
provides the Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial
statement misstatements, such as assessing both the carryover and reversing
effects of prior year misstatements on the current year financial statements.
The Company will adopt the misstatement evaluation requirements of SAB No.
108
for the Company's fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.
Fair
Value Measures
- In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measures. This
statement establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets
out
a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures
about
fair-value measurements. Statement No. 157 only applies to fair-value
measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards except for measurements of share-based payments and measurements
that
are similar to, but not intended to be, fair value. This statement is effective
for the specified fair value measures for financial statements issued for
fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will thus be effective for the
Company in fiscal 2008. We have not yet completed our analysis of the impact
of
SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements.
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995
Certain
written and oral statements made by the Company or our representatives in
this
report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
press releases, conferences, internet webcasts, or otherwise, are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement
that
may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or
achievements, and may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,”
“estimate,” “project,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. In our reports
and filings we may make forward looking statements regarding future product
and
training sales activity, anticipated expenses, projected cost reduction and
strategic initiatives, expected levels of depreciation expense, expectations
regarding tangible asset valuation expenses, expected improvements in cash
flows
from operating activities, estimated capital expenditures, and cash flow
estimates used to determine the fair value of long-lived assets. These, and
other forward-looking statements, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties
that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to time
in
reports filed by us with the SEC, including reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and
10-K. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the matters
discussed in Item 1A of our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August
31, 2006, entitled “Risk Factors.” In addition, such risks and uncertainties may
include unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas:
unanticipated costs or capital expenditures; difficulties encountered by
EDS in
operating and maintaining our information systems and controls, including
without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning, inventory
control, and order fulfillment; delays or unanticipated outcomes relating
to our
strategic plans; dependence on existing products or services; the rate and
consumer acceptance of new product introductions; competition; the number
and
nature of customers and their product orders, including changes in the timing
or
mix of product or training orders; pricing of our products and services and
those of competitors; adverse publicity; and other factors which may adversely
affect our business.
The
risks
included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include
additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial
performance, including the risk factors noted in Item 1A of our August 31,
2006
report on Form 10-K. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly
changing environment. New risk factors may emerge and it is not possible
for our
management to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact
of all
such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any single factor,
or
combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from
those
contained in forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties,
investors should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of
actual results.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile. In addition,
the stock markets in general have experienced increased volatility. Factors
such
as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues and earnings or losses and our
failure to meet expectations could have a significant impact on the market
price
of our common stock. In addition, the price of our common stock can change
for
reasons unrelated to our performance. Due to our low market capitalization,
the
price of our common stock may also be affected by conditions such as a lack
of
analyst coverage and fewer potential investors.
Forward-looking
statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and the
Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any of these statements
in the future except as required by law. Actual future performance and results
will differ and may differ materially from that contained in or suggested
by
forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Market
Risk of Financial Instruments
The
Company is exposed to financial instrument market risk primarily through
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage
risks associated with foreign currency exchange and interest rates, we make
limited use of derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are financial
instruments that derive their value from one or more underlying financial
instruments. As a matter of policy, our derivative instruments are entered
into
for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not
constitute positions that are independent of those exposures. In addition,
we do
not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes,
nor are
we party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The notional amounts of
derivatives do not represent actual amounts exchanged by the parties to the
instrument, and, thus, are not a measure of exposure to us through our use
of
derivatives. Additionally, we enter into derivative agreements only with
highly
rated counterparties and we do not expect to incur any losses resulting from
non-performance by other parties.
Foreign
Currency Sensitivity
Due
to
the global nature of our operations, we are subject to risks associated with
transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the United States
dollar, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in foreign
currencies to United States dollars as a normal part of the reporting process.
The objective of our foreign currency risk management activities is to reduce
foreign currency risk in the consolidated financial statements. In order
to
manage foreign currency risks, we make limited use of foreign currency forward
contracts and other foreign currency related derivative instruments. Although
we
cannot eliminate all aspects of our foreign currency risk, we believe that
our
strategy, which includes the use of derivative instruments, can reduce the
impacts of foreign currency related issues on our consolidated financial
statements. The following is a description of our use of foreign currency
derivative instruments.
During
the quarter ended December 2, 2006 we utilized foreign currency forward
contracts to manage the volatility of certain intercompany financing
transactions and other transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies.
Because these contracts do not meet specific hedge accounting requirements,
gains and losses on these contracts, which expire on a quarterly basis, are
recognized currently and are used to offset a portion of the gains or losses
of
the related accounts. The gains and losses on these contracts were recorded
as a
component of SG&A expense in our consolidated income statements and had the
following net impact on the periods indicated (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||
December
2,
2006
|
November
26,
2005
|
||||||
Losses
on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
Gains
on foreign exchange contracts
|
18
|
217
|
|||||
Net
gain on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
171
|
At
December 2, 2006, the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts,
which was determined using the estimated amount at which contracts could
be
settled based upon forward market exchange rates, was insignificant. The
notional amounts of our foreign currency sell contracts that did not qualify
for
hedge accounting were as follows at December 2, 2006 (in
thousands):
Contract
Description
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Notional
Amount in U.S. Dollars
|
|||||
Japanese
Yen
|
333,000
|
$
|
2,851
|
||||
Australian
Dollars
|
1,500
|
1,148
|
|||||
Mexican
Pesos
|
12,582
|
1,134
|
During
the quarter ended December 2, 2006, we did not utilize any derivative contracts
that qualified for hedge accounting. However, the Company may utilize net
investment hedge contracts or other foreign currency derivatives in future
periods as a component of our overall foreign currency risk
strategy.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The
Company is exposed to fluctuations in U.S. interest rates primarily as a
result
of the cash and cash equivalents that we hold. Our debt balances consist
primarily of a financing obligation associated with the sale of our corporate
headquarters facility and a long-term mortgage on certain of our buildings
and
property. As such, we do not have significant exposure or additional liability
due to interest rate sensitivity and we were not party to any interest rate
swap
or other interest related derivative instruments during the quarter ended
December 2, 2006.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate,
to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes
that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives,
and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer supervised and participated in the evaluation. Based on
this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that, due to the material weakness in our internal controls over financial
reporting identified in our fiscal 2006 Form 10-K related to capturing and
recording accounts payable for services, our disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective as of December 2, 2006.
In
light
of the material weakness described in our fiscal 2006 Form 10-K, we performed
additional procedures to ensure that our condensed consolidated financial
statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Accordingly, management believes that the condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this report fairly presents, in all material
respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for
the
periods presented.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We
are in
the process of instituting additional controls to remediate the material
weakness described in our fiscal 2006 Form 10-K. During the quarter ended
December 2, 2006 we added new accounts payable processes and procedures,
created
new system generated reports to identify potential missing liabilities, and
provided additional training to accounts payable personnel. However, we
were not able to remediate, and thereafter test the remediation of, the material
weakness identified by the end of our first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Other
than described above, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that
have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
controls over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. | RISK FACTIORS |
For
information regarding Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1A in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2006.
Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
The
Company acquired the following securities during the fiscal quarter ended
December 2, 2006:
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or
Programs
|
Maximum
Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans
or
Programs
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||
Common
Shares:
|
|||||||||||||
September
1, 2006 to October 7, 2006
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
none
|
$
|
4,887
|
|||||||
October
8, 2006 to November 4, 2006
|
-
|
-
|
none
|
4,887
|
|||||||||
November
5, 2006 to December 2, 2006
|
3,078
|
(2) |
5.18
|
none
|
4,887
|
(1)
|
|||||||
Total
Common Shares
|
3,078
|
$
|
5.18
|
none
|
|||||||||
Total
Preferred Shares
|
none
|
none
|
(1)
|
In
January 2006, our Board of Directors approved the purchase of up
to $10.0
million of our outstanding common stock. All previous authorized
common
stock purchase plans were canceled. Following the approval of this
stock
purchase plan, we have purchased a total of 681,300 shares of common
stock
for $5.1 million through December 2, 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
Amount
represents shares withheld for statutory taxes and penalties from
a
distribution of common shares to a participant in the Company’s
non-qualified deferred compensation
plan.
|
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
(A)
|
Exhibits:
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial
Officer
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
|
||||
Date:
|
January
11, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
ROBERT A. WHITMAN
|
|
Robert
A. Whitman
|
||||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||||
Date:
|
January
11, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
STEPHEN D. YOUNG
|
|
Stephen
D. Young
|
||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||||