FRANKLIN COVEY CO - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended June 2, 2007
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
file no. 1-11107
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Utah
(State
of Incorporation)
|
87-0401551
(I.R.S.
employer identification number)
|
|
2200
West Parkway Boulevard
Salt
Lake City, Utah
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
84119-2099
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number,
Including
area code
|
(801)
817-1776
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated
filer
|
x
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock
as of the latest practicable date:
19,430,423
shares of Common Stock as of July 9, 2007
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
June
2,
2007
|
August
31,
2006
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
5,170
|
$ |
30,587
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, less
allowance for doubtful accounts of $602 and $979
|
28,026
|
24,254
|
||||||
Inventories
|
24,245
|
21,790
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,863
|
4,130
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
6,503
|
6,359
|
||||||
Assets
held for sale
|
1,794
|
-
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
69,601
|
87,120
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
35,563
|
33,318
|
||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
76,821
|
79,532
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
84
|
4,340
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
14,129
|
12,249
|
||||||
$ |
196,198
|
$ |
216,559
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt and financing obligation
|
$ |
619
|
$ |
585
|
||||
Accounts
payable
|
12,301
|
13,769
|
||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
2,318
|
1,924
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
28,483
|
32,170
|
||||||
Line
of credit
|
17,844
|
-
|
||||||
Liabilities
held for sale
|
828
|
-
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
62,393
|
48,448
|
||||||
Long-term
debt and financing obligation, less current portion
|
33,235
|
33,559
|
||||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,213
|
1,203
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
96,841
|
83,210
|
||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock – Series A, no
par value; 4,000 shares authorized, zero and 1,494 shares issued
and
outstanding; liquidation preference totaling zero and
$38,278
|
-
|
37,345
|
||||||
Common
stock – $0.05 par value;
40,000 shares authorized, 27,056 shares issued and
outstanding
|
1,353
|
1,353
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
186,091
|
185,691
|
||||||
Common
stock
warrants
|
7,602
|
7,611
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
18,876
|
14,075
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive
income
|
1,319
|
653
|
||||||
Treasury
stock at cost, 7,344 and
7,083 shares
|
(115,204 | ) | (113,379 | ) | ||||
Other
comprehensive loss held for
sale
|
(680 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Total
shareholders’
equity
|
99,357
|
133,349
|
||||||
$ |
196,198
|
$ |
216,559
|
|||||
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Quarter
Ended
|
Three
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
|||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
Products
|
$ |
30,857
|
$ |
32,184
|
$ |
118,248
|
$ |
126,428
|
||||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
33,652
|
31,098
|
98,666
|
87,538
|
||||||||||||
64,509
|
63,282
|
216,914
|
213,966
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
Products
|
14,619
|
15,584
|
52,528
|
56,536
|
||||||||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
10,254
|
11,406
|
31,163
|
28,558
|
||||||||||||
24,873
|
26,990
|
83,691
|
85,094
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
39,636
|
36,292
|
133,223
|
128,872
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
35,287
|
35,629
|
112,803
|
108,885
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of manufacturing facility
|
-
|
-
|
(1,227 | ) |
-
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
|
1,060
|
1,134
|
3,463
|
3,763
|
||||||||||||
Amortization
|
906
|
908
|
2,708
|
2,911
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
2,383
|
(1,379 | ) |
15,476
|
13,313
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
124
|
307
|
682
|
953
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(867 | ) | (663 | ) | (2,203 | ) | (1,966 | ) | ||||||||
Legal
settlement
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
873
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
1,640
|
(1,735 | ) |
13,955
|
13,173
|
|||||||||||
Income
tax (expense) benefit
|
(753 | ) |
2,754
|
(6,939 | ) |
292
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
887
|
1,019
|
7,016
|
13,465
|
||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(348 | ) | (934 | ) | (2,215 | ) | (3,452 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ |
539
|
$ |
85
|
$ |
4,801
|
$ |
10,013
|
||||||||
Net
income available to common
shareholders
per
share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ |
.03
|
$ |
.00
|
$ |
.24
|
$ |
.50
|
||||||||
Diluted
|
$ |
.03
|
$ |
.00
|
$ |
.24
|
$ |
.48
|
||||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
19,412
|
20,060
|
19,637
|
20,234
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
19,969
|
20,734
|
20,062
|
20,670
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
Three
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
7,016
|
$ |
13,465
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
7,503
|
8,046
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,824
|
-
|
||||||
Gain
on disposals of property and equipment
|
(1,283 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
894
|
567
|
||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Increase
in accounts receivable, net
|
(4,408 | ) | (4,264 | ) | ||||
Increase
in inventories
|
(2,951 | ) | (1,388 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in other assets
|
1,236
|
856
|
||||||
Decrease
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(4,357 | ) | (4,628 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in other long-term liabilities
|
(188 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in income taxes payable
|
411
|
(2,535 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
8,697
|
9,927
|
||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(7,855 | ) | (3,318 | ) | ||||
Curriculum
development costs
|
(4,234 | ) | (1,812 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales of property and equipment
|
2,596
|
-
|
||||||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(9,493 | ) | (5,130 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from line of credit borrowing
|
30,429
|
-
|
||||||
Payments
on line of credit borrowing
|
(12,585 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt and financing obligation
|
(402 | ) | (965 | ) | ||||
Change
in restricted cash
|
-
|
699
|
||||||
Proceeds
from sales of common stock from treasury
|
206
|
333
|
||||||
Proceeds
from management stock loan payments
|
27
|
134
|
||||||
Redemptions
of preferred stock
|
(37,345 | ) | (20,000 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of treasury shares
|
(2,561 | ) | (3,982 | ) | ||||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(2,215 | ) | (3,952 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used for financing activities
|
(24,446 | ) | (27,733 | ) | ||||
Effect
of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
(175 | ) |
50
|
|||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(25,417 | ) | (22,886 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
30,587
|
51,690
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$ |
5,170
|
$ |
28,804
|
||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ |
2,048
|
$ |
2,001
|
||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ |
1,804
|
$ |
2,284
|
||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
934
|
||||
Capital
lease financing of property and equipment purchases
|
-
|
109
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE
1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Franklin
Covey Co. (hereafter referred to as us, we, our, or the Company) provides
integrated consulting, training, and performance enhancement solutions to
organizations and individuals in strategy execution, productivity, leadership,
sales force effectiveness, effective communications, and other
areas. Each integrated solution may include components of training
and consulting, assessment, and other application tools that are generally
available in electronic or paper-based formats. Our products and
services are available through professional consulting services, public
seminars, retail stores, catalogs, and the internet at
www.franklincovey.com. Historically, the Company’s best-known
offerings include the FranklinCovey Planner™ and a suite of
individual-effectiveness and leadership-development training products based
on
the best-selling book, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
People. We also offer a range of training and assessment
products to help organizations achieve superior results by focusing and
executing on top priorities, building the capability of knowledge workers,
and
aligning business processes. These offerings include the following
popular workshops and curricula: FOCUS: Achieving Your Highest
Priorities™ The 4 Disciplines of Execution™ The 4 Roles of
Leadership™ Building Business Acumen: What the CEO Wants You to
Know™ the Advantage Series communication workshops; and the Execution
Quotient (xQ™) organizational assessment tool. During
fiscal 2007 we have also introduced a new leadership program based upon
principles found in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
People.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect,
in
the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results
of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
indicated. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules
and regulations. The information included in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
dates
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company utilizes a modified 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on August 31 of
each year. Corresponding quarterly periods generally consist of
13-week periods that ended on December 2, 2006, March 3, 2007, and June 2,
2007
during fiscal 2007. Under the modified 52/53-week fiscal year, the
quarter ended June 2, 2007 had the same number of business days as the quarter
ended May 27, 2006 and the three quarters ended June 2, 2007 included four
more
business days than the three quarters ended May 27, 2006.
The
results of operations for the quarter and three quarters ended June 2, 2007
are
not necessarily indicative of results expected for the entire fiscal year ending
August 31, 2007.
NOTE
2 – OPERATIONS HELD FOR SALE
During
the quarter ended June 2, 2007, we initiated plans to sell our directly owned
subsidiaries located in Mexico and Brazil and to convert them into licensed
operations. Based upon guidance found in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, we determined that the assets and
liabilities of these subsidiaries should be classified as held for sale at
June
2, 2007. The sales of these direct offices, which are currently
reported in the international segment of the Organizational Solutions Business
Unit (OSBU), are expected to close during the quarter ended August 31,
2007. The sale transactions for each of the subsidiaries are
currently structured such that the net assets of the subsidiaries will be sold
at their carrying values. Estimated costs to complete the sales
transactions were accrued (and expensed) during the quarter ended June 2,
2007. The Company does not anticipate any additional losses resulting
from the sales of the Mexico and Brazil subsidiaries. The carrying
amounts of the assets and liabilities of our Mexico and Brazil subsidiaries,
which were classified as held for sale in our June 2, 2007 consolidated balance
sheet were as follows (in thousands):
Description
|
Mexico
|
Brazil
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$ |
156
|
$ |
515
|
$ |
671
|
||||||
Inventories
|
345
|
123
|
468
|
|||||||||
Other
current assets
|
50
|
190
|
240
|
|||||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
115
|
212
|
327
|
|||||||||
Other
assets
|
28
|
60
|
88
|
|||||||||
Total
assets held for sale
|
$ |
694
|
$ |
1,100
|
$ |
1,794
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
61
|
$ |
173
|
$ |
234
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
199
|
395
|
594
|
|||||||||
Total
liabilities held for sale
|
$ |
260
|
$ |
568
|
$ |
828
|
Since
the
Company will continue to participate in the cash flows of the Mexico and Brazil
subsidiaries through royalty payments, which are based primarily upon the sales
recorded by the licensees, and expects to have significant continuing
involvement in the operations of the licensees, we determined that the financial
results of the Mexico and Brazil subsidiaries should not be reported as
discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated income
statements.
NOTE
3 – INVENTORIES
Inventories
of operations not held for sale are stated at the lower of cost or market,
cost
being determined using the first-in, first-out method, and were comprised of
the
following (in thousands):
June
2,
2007
|
August
31,
2006
|
|||||||
Finished
goods
|
$ |
20,946
|
$ |
18,464
|
||||
Work
in process
|
503
|
706
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
2,796
|
2,620
|
||||||
$ |
24,245
|
$ |
21,790
|
NOTE
4 – LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS
On
March
14, 2007, we entered into long-term secured revolving line-of-credit agreements
with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Zions First National Bank (the Credit
Agreements). The Credit Agreements provide a total of $25.0 million
of borrowing capacity to the Company at an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus
1.10 percent. The Credit Agreements expire on March 14, 2010 and we
may draw on the credit facilities, repay, and draw again, on a revolving basis,
up to the maximum loan amount of $25.0 million so long as no event of default
has occurred and is continuing. The Credit Agreements also contain
customary representations and guarantees as well as provisions for repayment
and
liens.
In
addition to customary non-financial terms and conditions, the Credit Agreements
require us to be in compliance with specified financial covenants, including:
(i) a funded debt to earnings ratio; (ii) a fixed charge coverage ratio; (iii)
a
limitation on annual capital expenditures; and (iv) a defined amount of minimum
net worth. In the event of noncompliance with these financial
covenants and other defined events of default, the lenders are entitled to
certain remedies, including acceleration of the repayment of amounts outstanding
on the Credit Agreements. As of June 2, 2007, there were no known
events of default and we were in compliance with the terms, conditions, and
financial covenants of the Credit Agreements.
In
connection with the Credit Agreements, the Company entered into separate
promissory notes, a security agreement, repayment guaranty agreements, and
a
pledge and security agreement. These agreements pledge substantially
all of the Company’s assets located in the United States and a certain foreign
location to the lenders in the Credit Agreements.
The
Company may use the Credit Agreements for general corporate purposes and during
the quarter ended June 2, 2007 we used a portion of the credit available through
the Credit Agreements to redeem the remaining shares of our outstanding Series
A
preferred stock as described in Note 5.
In
addition to the lines of credit described above, we obtained a CDN $500,000
(approximately $425,300) revolving line of credit with a Canadian Bank through
our wholly owned Canadian subsidiary (the Canadian Line of Credit) during fiscal
2007. The Canadian Line of Credit bears interest at the Canadian
prime rate and is a revolving line of credit that may be repeatedly borrowed
against and repaid during the life of the agreement. The Canadian
Line of Credit may be used for general corporate purposes and requires our
Canadian subsidiary to maintain a specified financial covenant for minimum
debt
service coverage or the payment of the loan may be accelerated. As of
June 2, 2007 we had not yet drawn upon the Canadian Line of Credit.
In
connection with the Canadian Line of Credit, the interest rate on a previously
existing mortgage agreement with the same Canadian Bank was reduced from the
Canadian prime rate plus one percent to the Canadian prime rate. All
other terms on the existing Canadian mortgage remained the same and the Company
does not believe that the one percent decrease in the interest rate represents
a
material modification to the terms of the loan agreement.
NOTE
5 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Redemption
of Preferred Stock
During
the quarter ended June 2, 2007, we used substantially all of our cash and cash
equivalents on hand in combination with proceeds from a newly obtained line
of
credit agreement (Note 4) to redeem all of the remaining outstanding shares
of
Series A preferred stock, which totaled $37.3 million, or approximately 1.5
million shares. The shares of preferred stock were redeemed at the
liquidation preference of $25 per share, plus $0.3 million of dividends that
were accrued through the redemption date.
Board
of Director Unvested Share Award
In
connection with the Company’s shareholder-approved 2004 Non-Employee Directors’
Stock Incentive Plan, we issued 31,500 shares of common stock as unvested share
awards to certain members of the Board of Directors during the quarter ended
June 2, 2007. The compensation expense of the award, which was based
on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, totaled
$0.2 million and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the 36 month
vesting period of the award. The common shares issued from treasury
for the unvested award had a cost basis of $0.5 million.
A
summary
of the changes to certain shareholders’ equity accounts during the three
quarters ended June 2, 2007 is presented below (in thousands):
Preferred
Stock
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at August 31, 2006
|
1,494
|
$ |
37,345
|
$ |
185,691
|
$ |
14,075
|
(7,083 | ) | $ | (113,379 | ) | ||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(2,215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
(1,494 | ) | (37,345 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
(338 | ) | (2,539 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock from treasury
|
(6 | ) |
45
|
213
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested
stock award
|
(501 | ) |
32
|
501
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
894
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
7,016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
13
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at June 2, 2007
|
-
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
186,091
|
$ |
18,876
|
(7,344 | ) | $ | (115,204 | ) |
NOTE
6 – SALE OF MANUFACTURING FACILITY
In
August
2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations to improve
our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our
printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing service
sales. Our reconfiguration plan included moving our printing
operations a short distance from its existing location to our corporate
headquarters campus and the sale of the manufacturing facility and certain
printing presses. Other existing presses were moved to the new
location as part of the reconfiguration plan. Because the
manufacturing facility and printing presses were not available for immediate
sale as defined by SFAS No. 144, they were not classified as held for sale
prior
to the completion of the sale agreements. At June 2, 2007 our printing services
reconfiguration plan was substantially complete and the new presses were
operating in the new manufacturing location.
During
the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we completed the sale of the manufacturing
facility. The sale price was $2.5 million and, after deducting
customary closing costs, the net proceeds to the Company from the sale totaled
$2.3 million in cash. The carrying value of the manufacturing
facility at the date of sale was approximately $1.1 million and accordingly,
we
recognized a $1.2 million gain on the sale of the manufacturing facility during
the quarter. The manufacturing facility assets sold were primarily
reported as a component of corporate assets for segment reporting
purposes. Due to a lower-than-expected sale price on one of the
printing presses to be sold, we previously recorded an impairment charge
totaling $0.3 million to reduce the carrying value of the printing press to
its
anticipated sale price. The impairment charge was included as a
component of depreciation expense in our condensed consolidated income
statements for the three quarters ended June 2, 2007.
NOTE
7 – INCOME TAXES
In
order
to determine our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated
annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income and
statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we
operate. Certain significant or unusual items are separately
recognized in the quarter during which they occur and can be a source of
variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that it was appropriate to
reverse substantially all of the valuation allowances on our deferred income
tax
assets. Prior to the reversal of these valuation allowances, our
income tax provisions were affected by reductions in our deferred income tax
valuation allowance as we utilized net operating loss
carryforwards. The fiscal 2006 income tax provision was further
reduced by the reversal of tax contingency reserves during the third
quarter. No reversals of valuation allowance or tax contingency
reserves occurred during fiscal 2007. Accordingly, our income tax
provision was $0.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and totaled
$6.9
million for the three quarters ended June 2, 2007. Our effective tax
rate for the three quarters ended June 2, 2007 of approximately 50 percent
was
higher than statutory combined rates primarily due to the accrual of taxable
interest income on the management stock loan program and withholding taxes
on
royalty income from foreign licensees. Since the Company is currently
utilizing net operating loss carryforwards, we are unable to reduce our domestic
tax liability through the use of foreign tax credits, which normally result
from
the payment of foreign withholding taxes.
NOTE
8 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive
income is based on net income and includes charges and credits to equity
accounts that were not the result of transactions with
shareholders. Comprehensive income for the Company was calculated as
follows (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Three
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
887
|
$ |
1,019
|
$ |
7,016
|
$ |
13,465
|
||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss) items, net of tax:
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(30 | ) |
434
|
(14 | ) |
214
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ |
857
|
$ |
1,453
|
$ |
7,002
|
$ |
13,679
|
NOTE
9 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income available
to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net
income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using
the treasury stock method or the “as converted” method, as
appropriate. Due to the modifications to our management stock loan
program made during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that the
shares of management stock loan participants which were placed in the escrow
account are participating securities as defined by Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under
FASB Statement No. 128, because they continue to have equivalent common
stock dividend rights. Accordingly, these management stock loan
shares are included in our basic EPS calculation during periods of net income
and excluded from the basic EPS calculation in periods of net loss.
The
following table presents the computation of our EPS for the periods indicated
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
Quarter
Ended
|
Three
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
887
|
$ |
1,019
|
$ |
7,016
|
$ |
13,465
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(348 | ) | (934 | ) | (2,215 | ) | (3,452 | ) | ||||||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$ |
539
|
$ |
85
|
$ |
4,801
|
$ |
10,013
|
||||||||
Denominator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
19,412
|
20,060
|
19,637
|
20,234
|
||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
34
|
75
|
31
|
55
|
||||||||||||
Unvested
stock awards
|
292
|
303
|
265
|
280
|
||||||||||||
Performance
awards
|
231
|
100
|
129
|
35
|
||||||||||||
Common
stock warrants(2)
|
-
|
196
|
-
|
66
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
weighted average shares outstanding
|
19,969
|
20,734
|
20,062
|
20,670
|
||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted EPS:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ |
.03
|
$ |
.00
|
$ |
.24
|
$ |
.50
|
||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ |
.03
|
$ |
.00
|
$ |
.24
|
$ |
.48
|
(1)
|
Since
the Company recognized net income for the quarter and three quarters
ended
June 2, 2007, basic weighted average shares for those periods include
3.5
million shares of common stock held by management stock loan participants
that were placed in escrow.
|
(2)
|
For
the quarter and three quarters ended June 2, 2007, the conversion
of 6.2
million common stock warrants is not assumed because such conversion
would
be anti-dilutive.
|
We
had
approximately 1.9 million and 1.8 million stock options outstanding at June
2,
2007 and May 27, 2006 which were not included in the computation of diluted
EPS
because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price
of the Company’s common shares for the respective periods. Although
these shares were not included in our calculation of diluted EPS, these stock
options, and other dilutive securities, may have a dilutive effect on the
Company’s EPS calculation in future periods if the price of our common stock
increases.
NOTE
10 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company has two segments: the Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU)
and the Organizational Solutions Business Unit (OSBU). The following
is a description of our segments, their primary operating components, and their
significant business activities:
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit – This business unit is primarily
focused on sales to individual customers and small business organizations
and includes the results of our domestic retail stores, consumer
direct
operations (primarily catalog, eCommerce, and public programs), wholesale
operations, international product channels in certain countries,
and other
related distribution channels, including government product sales
and
domestic printing and publishing sales. The CSBU results of
operations also include the financial results of our paper planner
manufacturing operations. Although CSBU sales primarily consist
of products such as planners, binders, software, totes, and related
accessories, virtually any component of our leadership, productivity,
and
strategy execution solutions may be purchased through our CSBU
channels.
|
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit – The OSBU is primarily responsible
for the development, marketing, sale, and delivery of strategic execution,
productivity, leadership, sales force performance, and communication
training and consulting solutions directly to organizational clients,
including other companies, the government, and educational
institutions. The OSBU includes the financial results of our
domestic sales force and certain international operations. The
domestic sales force is responsible for the sale and delivery of
our
training and consulting services in the United States. Our
international sales group includes the financial results of our directly
owned foreign offices and royalty revenues from
licensees.
|
The
Company’s chief operating decision maker is the CEO, and each of the segments
has a president who reports directly to the CEO. The primary
measurement tool used in business unit performance analysis is earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), which may not be
calculated as similarly titled amounts calculated by other
companies. For segment reporting purposes, the Company’s consolidated
EBITDA can be calculated as its income from operations excluding depreciation
expense, amortization expense, and the gain from the sale of our manufacturing
facility.
In
the
normal course of business, we may make structural and cost allocation revisions
to our segment information to reflect new reporting responsibilities within
the
organization. During fiscal 2007 we transferred the international
product channels in certain countries from OSBU to CSBU, and have made other
less significant organizational changes throughout the current fiscal
year. All prior period segment information has been revised to
conform to the most recent classifications and organizational
changes. The Company accounts for its segment information on the same
basis as the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
June
2, 2007
|
Sales
to External Customers
|
Gross
Profit
|
EBITDA
|
Depreciation
|
Amortization
|
|||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$ |
10,010
|
$ |
5,706
|
$ | (715 | ) | $ |
169
|
$ |
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
10,715
|
6,377
|
4,477
|
58
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
6,901
|
3,851
|
3,704
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
1,125
|
628
|
(176 | ) |
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,544
|
302
|
(6,106 | ) |
202
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
30,295
|
16,864
|
1,184
|
429
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
20,297
|
13,241
|
2,092
|
181
|
899
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
13,917
|
9,531
|
3,375
|
215
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
34,214
|
22,772
|
5,467
|
396
|
906
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
64,509
|
39,636
|
6,651
|
825
|
906
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(2,302 | ) |
235
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ |
64,509
|
$ |
39,636
|
$ |
4,349
|
$ |
1,060
|
$ |
906
|
||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
May
27, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$ |
11,414
|
$ |
6,307
|
$ | (733 | ) | $ |
269
|
$ |
-
|
|||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
12,912
|
7,669
|
5,676
|
16
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
6,523
|
3,336
|
3,177
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
1,148
|
621
|
(395 | ) |
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,168
|
118
|
(6,870 | ) |
300
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
33,165
|
18,051
|
855
|
585
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
17,875
|
11,026
|
457
|
90
|
902
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
12,242
|
7,215
|
810
|
288
|
6
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
30,117
|
18,241
|
1,267
|
378
|
908
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
63,282
|
36,292
|
2,122
|
963
|
908
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(1,459 | ) |
171
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ |
63,282
|
$ |
36,292
|
$ |
663
|
$ |
1,134
|
$ |
908
|
||||||||||
Three
Quarters Ended
June
2, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$ |
43,402
|
$ |
25,966
|
$ |
5,195
|
$ |
546
|
$ |
-
|
||||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
47,713
|
28,596
|
22,113
|
137
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
15,059
|
8,561
|
8,114
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
6,153
|
3,721
|
1,020
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
4,422
|
456
|
(22,014 | ) |
993
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
116,749
|
67,300
|
14,428
|
1,676
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
57,331
|
36,982
|
4,105
|
440
|
2,701
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
42,834
|
28,941
|
9,592
|
625
|
7
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
100,165
|
65,923
|
13,697
|
1,065
|
2,708
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
216,914
|
133,223
|
28,125
|
2,741
|
2,708
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(7,705 | ) |
722
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ |
216,914
|
$ |
133,223
|
$ |
20,420
|
$ |
3,463
|
$ |
2,708
|
||||||||||
Three
Quarters Ended
May
27, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$ |
49,837
|
$ |
29,290
|
$ |
5,360
|
$ |
1,042
|
$ |
-
|
||||||||||
Consumer
direct
|
51,701
|
30,968
|
24,566
|
43
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
15,773
|
7,812
|
7,357
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
6,473
|
4,025
|
1,260
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
3,623
|
630
|
(22,524 | ) |
957
|
57
|
||||||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
127,407
|
72,725
|
16,019
|
2,042
|
57
|
|||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
49,552
|
31,957
|
2,240
|
263
|
2,845
|
|||||||||||||||
International
|
37,007
|
24,190
|
7,059
|
940
|
9
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
86,559
|
56,147
|
9,299
|
1,203
|
2,854
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
213,966
|
128,872
|
25,318
|
3,245
|
2,911
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(5,331 | ) |
518
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$ |
213,966
|
$ |
128,872
|
$ |
19,987
|
$ |
3,763
|
$ |
2,911
|
||||||||||
A
reconciliation of operating segment EBITDA to consolidated income before taxes
is provided below (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Three
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Reportable
segment EBITDA
|
$ |
6,651
|
$ |
2,122
|
$ |
28,125
|
$ |
25,318
|
||||||||
Corporate
expenses
|
(2,302 | ) | (1,459 | ) | (7,705 | ) | (5,331 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated
EBITDA
|
4,349
|
663
|
20,420
|
19,987
|
||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of manufacturing facility
|
-
|
-
|
1,227
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
(1,060 | ) | (1,134 | ) | (3,463 | ) | (3,763 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
|
(906 | ) | (908 | ) | (2,708 | ) | (2,911 | ) | ||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
2,383
|
(1,379 | ) |
15,476
|
13,313
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
124
|
307
|
682
|
953
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(867 | ) | (663 | ) | (2,203 | ) | (1,966 | ) | ||||||||
Legal
settlement
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
873
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
$ |
1,640
|
$ | (1,735 | ) | $ |
13,955
|
$ |
13,173
|
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements are based upon management’s current expectations and are subject to
various uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in
forward-looking statements are set forth below under the heading “Safe Harbor
Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.”
The
Company suggests that the following discussion and analysis be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Our
third
fiscal quarter, which includes the months of March, April, and May, has
historically reflected stronger training and consulting sales, but seasonally
weaker product sales when compared to our first two fiscal
quarters. For the quarter ended June 2, 2007, our income from
operations increased by $3.8 million to $2.4 million compared to a $1.4 million
loss in the prior year. However, due to a significant increase in our
effective income tax rate, our net income decreased to $0.9 million compared
to
$1.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. As a result of
decreased preferred stock dividends, our net income available to common
shareholders increased to $0.5 million compared to $0.1 million in the
corresponding quarter of the prior year.
Our
financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2006 were adversely affected
by the correction of misstatements at our Mexico subsidiary, which reduced
sales
by $0.5 million and increased selling, general, and administrative expenses
by
$0.5 million. These prior year corrections contributed to favorable
period-over-period comparisons during the current fiscal year.
The
primary factors that influenced our operating results in the quarter ended
June
2, 2007 were as follows:
·
|
Sales
– Consolidated training and consulting
services sales increased $2.6 million, or 8 percent, primarily due
to
increased sales of our new leadership program based upon the principles
found in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, improved sales
effectiveness training sales, increased strategy execution sales,
and
increased international sales. Product sales declined $1.3
million, or 4 percent, primarily due to reduced retail and consumer
direct
channel (primarily catalog, eCommerce, and public programs)
sales.
|
·
|
Gross
Profit – Our consolidated gross profit totaled $39.6 million
for the quarter ended June 2, 2007 compared to $36.3 million in the
same
quarter of the prior year. Our consolidated gross margin, which
is gross profit in terms of a percentage of sales, increased to 61.4
percent of sales for the quarter ended June 2, 2007 compared to 57.3
percent of sales in fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily
attributable to the continuing shift toward increased training and
consulting sales, which generally have higher margins than the majority
of
our product sales, and the fiscal 2006 correction of misstated sales
at
our Mexico subsidiary. Training and consulting service sales
increased to 52 percent of total sales in fiscal 2007 compared to
49
percent of total sales in the prior year.
|
·
|
Operating
Costs – Our operating costs decreased by $0.4 million
compared to the prior year, which was the result of decreased selling,
general, and administrative expenses totaling $0.3 million and decreased
depreciation expense of $0.1 million. Amortization expense from
our definite-lived intangible assets remained consistent with the
prior
year.
|
·
|
Income
Taxes – Our income tax expense for the quarter ended June 2,
2007 was $0.8 million compared to a $2.8 million benefit in the prior
year. The increase in our current year tax expense was
primarily the result of taxable income. The fiscal 2006 benefit
resulted primarily from the expiration of the statute of limitations
on
various tax exposures. No reversals of valuation allowance or
tax contingency reserves occurred during fiscal 2007. Our
effective tax rate for the three quarters ended June 2, 2007 of
approximately 50 percent was higher than statutory combined rates
primarily due to the accrual of taxable interest income on the management
stock loan program and withholding taxes on royalty income from foreign
licensees.
|
·
|
Redemption
of Preferred Stock – During the quarter ended June 2, 2007,
we redeemed all remaining outstanding shares of Series A preferred
stock,
which totaled $37.3 million plus $0.3 million of accrued
dividends. Although we obtained a line of credit to finance a
portion of the preferred stock redemption and will incur interest
charges
on amounts borrowed, the redemption of the remaining preferred stock
will
reduce our required cash outflows for dividends by $3.7 million per
year.
|
Further
details regarding these factors and their impact on our operating results and
liquidity are provided throughout the following management’s discussion and
analysis.
Quarter
Ended June 2, 2007 Compared to the Quarter Ended May 27, 2006
Sales
The
following table sets forth sales data by category and for our operating segments
(in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Three
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
Percent
Change
|
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
Percent
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sales
by Category:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products
|
$ |
30,857
|
$ |
32,184
|
(4)
|
$ |
118,248
|
$ |
126,428
|
(6)
|
||||||||||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
33,652
|
31,098
|
8
|
98,666
|
87,538
|
13
|
||||||||||||||||||
$ |
64,509
|
$ |
63,282
|
2
|
$ |
216,914
|
$ |
213,966
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail
Stores
|
$ |
10,010
|
$ |
11,414
|
(12)
|
$ |
43,402
|
$ |
49,837
|
(13)
|
||||||||||||||
Consumer
Direct
|
10,715
|
12,912
|
(17)
|
47,713
|
51,701
|
(8)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
6,901
|
6,523
|
6
|
15,059
|
15,773
|
(5)
|
||||||||||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
1,125
|
1,148
|
(2)
|
6,153
|
6,473
|
(5)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,544
|
1,168
|
32
|
4,422
|
3,623
|
22
|
||||||||||||||||||
30,295
|
33,165
|
(9)
|
116,749
|
127,407
|
(8)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
20,297
|
17,875
|
14
|
57,331
|
49,552
|
16
|
||||||||||||||||||
International
|
13,917
|
12,242
|
14
|
42,834
|
37,007
|
16
|
||||||||||||||||||
34,214
|
30,117
|
14
|
100,165
|
86,559
|
16
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
Sales
|
$ |
64,509
|
$ |
63,282
|
2
|
$ |
216,914
|
$ |
213,966
|
1
|
Product
Sales– Overall product sales, which primarily
consists of planners, binders, totes, software and related accessories that
are
primarily sold through our Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU) channels,
declined $1.3 million, or 4 percent, compared to the prior year. The
following is a description of sales performance in our CSBU channels for the
quarter ended June 2, 2007:
·
|
Retail
Stores – The decline in retail sales was primarily due to fewer
stores, which had a $0.6 million impact on sales, reduced demand
for
technology and related products, which declined $0.5 million, and
decreased traffic in our other retail locations. Reduced
traffic in our stores contributed to decreased sales of “core” products
(e.g. planners, binders, forms, and totes) during the
quarter. However, declining traffic in our retail stores was
partially offset by improved conversion rates among those
shoppers. These factors combined to produce a 7 percent
decrease in comparable store (stores which were open during the comparable
periods) sales compared to the prior year. At June 2, 2007, we
were operating 87 retail stores compared to 93 stores at May 27,
2006. Based upon our continuing analyses of retail store
performance, we may close additional retail store locations and continue
to experience decreased sales resulting from closed stores in future
periods.
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct – Sales through our consumer direct channels (primarily
catalog, eCommerce, and public programs) decreased $2.2 million,
or 17
percent, due to decreased sales in each of the consumer direct
channels. Catalog sales decreased primarily due to decreased
traffic and eCommerce sales declined due to both decreased traffic
and
lower conversion rates from web site visitors. Public program
sales decreased $0.8 million primarily due to a reduced number of
seminars
held during the quarter. In addition, sales through government
depots decreased due to a decision by the government to discontinue
sales
of dated paper products through these stores.
|
·
|
Wholesale
– Sales through our wholesale channel, which includes sales
to
office superstores and other retail chains, increased $0.4 million
primarily due to the timing of seasonal product sales to these
entities.
|
CSBU
International – This channel includes the product sales of our
directly owned international offices in Canada, the United Kingdom,
Mexico, and Australia. Sales performance for the quarter
through these channels remained relatively consistent with the prior
year. We separated the product sales operations from the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit in these international locations
during fiscal 2007 to utilize existing product sales and marketing
expertise in an effort to improve overall product sales performance
at
these offices.
|
|
·
|
Other
CSBU – Other CSBU sales consist primarily of domestic printing
and publishing sales and building sublease revenues. The
increase in other CSBU sales was primarily due to increased external
domestic printing sales compared to the prior
year.
|
Training
and Consulting Services – We offer a variety of
training courses, training related products, and consulting services focused
on
productivity, leadership, strategy execution, sales force performance, and
effective communications training programs that are provided both domestically
and internationally through the Organizational Solutions Business Unit
(OSBU). Our consolidated training and consulting service sales
increased $2.6 million compared to the prior year. Training and
consulting service sales performance during the quarter was primarily influenced
by the following factors in the OSBU divisions:
·
|
Domestic
– Our domestic training, consulting,
and related sales reported through the OSBU continued to show improvement
over the prior year and increased by $2.4 million, or 14
percent. The improvement was primarily due to increased sales
of our new leadership program based upon principles found in The Seven
Habits of Highly Effective People, increased training
effectiveness sales, and increased strategy execution
sales. Sales performance improved in nearly all of our domestic
regions as our booked days delivered increased compared to the prior
year. Our current outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2007
continues to be strong and current training days booked has increased
compared to the prior year. We believe that the introduction of
new programs and refreshed existing programs will continue to have
a
favorable impact on training and consulting service sales in future
periods.
|
·
|
International
– International sales increased
$1.7
million, or 14 percent, compared to the prior year. Sales
increased over the prior year at all of our directly owned foreign
offices
except Canada, as well as from licensee royalty revenues. The
translation of foreign sales to United States dollars resulted in
a $0.1
million favorable impact to our consolidated sales as certain foreign
currencies strengthened against the United States dollar during the
quarter ended June 2, 2007.
|
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit consists of net sales less the cost of goods sold or the cost of services
provided. Our consolidated gross profit totaled $39.6 million for the
quarter ended June 2, 2007 compared to $36.3 million in the prior
year. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross profit stated in
terms of a percentage of sales, was 61.4 percent of sales compared to 57.3
percent in fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to
the continuing shift toward increased training and consulting sales, which
generally have higher margins than the majority of our product sales, and the
fiscal 2006 correction of misstated sales at our Mexico
subsidiary. Training and consulting service sales increased to 52
percent of total sales in fiscal 2007 compared to 49 percent in the prior
year.
Our
gross
margin on product sales improved to 52.6 percent compared to 51.6 percent in
fiscal 2006. The improvement was primarily due to the continuing
shift in our product mix toward increased sales of higher margin planners and
binders as a percent of total sales, while sales of lower margin technology
and
specialty products continue to decline.
For
the
quarter ended June 2, 2007, our training and consulting services gross margin
was 69.5 percent compared to 63.3 percent in the same quarter of the prior
year. The improvement in training and consulting services gross
margin was primarily due to changes in the mix of training programs sold and
the
correction of misstated sales at our Mexico subsidiary in the prior
year.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General and Administrative – Our selling,
general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased $0.3 million, or 1
percent, compared to the prior year. The decrease in our SG&A
expenses was primarily due to 1) the correction of misstatements at our Mexico
subsidiary in the quarter ended May 27, 2006, which totaled $0.5 million, plus
increased professional fees and travel that totaled approximately $0.2 million;
2) decreased advertising and promotional expenses totaling $0.4 million,
primarily related to reduced tradeshow expenses; and 3) decreased accounting
and
consulting fees totaling $0.2 million, which were incurred to become compliant
with the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(SOX). These decreases were partially offset by increased associate
costs totaling $1.1 million related to increased OSBU sales and additional
sales
personnel. The Company believes that the addition of these new sales
personnel has contributed to the increase in overall training and consulting
service sales and we intend to increase the number of sales personnel in future
periods.
We
are
currently pursuing numerous cost reduction strategies designed to control costs
and bring spending in line with desired business models. While we
believe that these efforts will be successful in reducing our operating
expenses, the success of these initiatives is dependent upon numerous factors,
many of which are not within our control. Due to the time necessary
to implement these cost reduction strategies, we may not be able to implement
these new initiatives quickly enough to have a significant impact upon our
fiscal 2007 operating results.
Interest
Income and Expense
Interest
Income – Our interest income decreased by $0.2 million compared to
fiscal 2006 due to reduced cash and cash equivalents held during the quarter
ended June 2, 2007. During the quarter ended June 2, 2007, we used
substantially all of our available cash and cash equivalents combined with
proceeds from a newly acquired line of credit to redeem the remaining
outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock.
Interest
Expense – Interest expense increased $0.2 million primarily due to
line of credit borrowings that were used in conjunction with available cash
to
redeem the remaining shares of preferred stock.
Three
Quarters Ended June 2, 2007 Compared to the Three Quarters Ended May 27,
2006
Sales
Product
Sales – Our product sales, which are primarily
sold through the Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU) channels, declined
$8.2
million, or 6 percent, compared to the prior year. The following is a
description of sales performance in our CSBU channels for the three quarters
ended June 2, 2007:
·
|
Retail
Stores – The decline in retail sales was primarily due to fewer
stores, which had a $4.8 million impact on sales, reduced demand
for
technology and related products, which declined $1.7 million, and
decreased traffic in our retail locations. Partially offsetting
these factors was a slight increase in sales of “core” products during the
first three quarters of fiscal 2007. These factors combined to
produce a 4 percent decrease in comparable store (stores which were
open
during the comparable periods) sales, including the impact of four
additional business days in fiscal 2007, when compared to fiscal
2006.
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct – Sales through our consumer direct channels decreased
$4.0 million, or 8 percent, primarily due to decreased traffic and
conversion rates experienced in our internet and catalog
channels. Public seminar sales decreased $0.8 million primarily
due to decreased programs and participation during the quarter ended
June
2, 2007. In addition, sales through government depots continue
to decrease due to a decision by the government to discontinue sales
of
dated paper products through these stores.
|
·
|
Wholesale
– Sales through our wholesale channel, which includes sales
to
office superstores and other retail chains, decreased $0.7 million
primarily due to reduced demand for our products from one of our
wholesale
customers.
|
·
|
CSBU
International – This channel includes the product sales of our
directly owned international offices in Canada, the United Kingdom,
Mexico, and Australia. Sales performance through these channels
decreased $0.3 million compared with the prior year due to reduced
demand
for products in these countries.
|
·
|
Other
CSBU – The $0.8 million increase in other CSBU sales was
primarily due to increased external printing sales compared to the
prior
year.
|
Training
and Consulting Services – Our consolidated
training and consulting service sales increased $11.1 million, or 13 percent,
compared to the prior year. Training and consulting service sales
performance improved during each of the first three quarters of fiscal 2007
and
was influenced by the following trends in the OSBU divisions:
·
|
Domestic
– Our domestic training sales
increased
by $7.8 million, or 16 percent, primarily due to increased sales
of our
new leadership program based upon principles found in The Seven Habits
of Highly Effective People, increased training
effectiveness sales, and increased strategy execution
sales. Our current outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2007
continues to be strong and our training days booked have increased
compared to the prior year.
|
·
|
International
– International sales increased
$5.8
million, or 16 percent, compared to the prior year. Sales
increased over the prior year at all of our directly owned foreign
offices, as well as from licensee royalty revenues. The
translation of foreign sales to United States dollars produced a
$0.3
million favorable impact to our consolidated sales as certain foreign
currencies strengthened against the United States dollar during the
three
quarters ended June 2, 2007.
|
Gross
Profit
Due
to
increased training and consulting services sales in fiscal 2007, our
consolidated gross profit totaled $133.2 million for the three quarters ended
June 2, 2007 compared to $128.9 million in the corresponding period of fiscal
2006. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross profit stated in
terms of a percentage of sales, improved slightly to 61.4 percent of
consolidated sales, compared to 60.2 percent in fiscal 2006. The
improvement in gross margin was primarily due to increased training and
consulting services sales as a percent of total sales. During the
first three quarters of fiscal 2007, training and consulting services sales
increased to 46 percent of total consolidated sales compared to 41 percent
of
total consolidated sales in the prior year.
Despite
declining product sales as discussed above, our gross margin on product sales
remained relatively consistent at 55.6 percent compared to 55.3 percent in
fiscal 2006.
For
the
three quarters ended June 2, 2007, our training and consulting services gross
margin was 68.4 percent compared to 67.4 percent in the prior year.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General and Administrative – Consolidated
SG&A expenses increased $3.9 million, or 4 percent, compared to the prior
year. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to 1) the
impact of additional business days during fiscal 2007 on associate costs; 2)
increased personnel costs resulting primarily from additional OSBU sales
personnel, totaling approximately $0.9 million; 3) increased audit and
consulting costs resulting from compliance with SOX 404; 4) increased legal
fees
resulting from a non-recurring benefit recorded in fiscal 2006 on the WMA legal
settlement and increased legal costs for ongoing litigation that had a net
impact on our operating expenses totaling $0.7 million; and 5) increased
share-based compensation costs totaling $0.3 million that resulted primarily
from the issuance of long-term incentive awards. Due to the four
additional business days included in fiscal 2007, we incurred an additional
$1.5
million of associate costs, including payroll and related
benefits. Accordingly, our fourth fiscal quarter will have less
business days and associated costs in fiscal 2007 than in fiscal
2006. During fiscal 2006, we were required to begin complying with
SOX 404, which resulted in $0.7 million of additional auditing and consulting
fees. These increased operating costs were partially offset by
reduced expenses in various other areas of the Company.
Gain
on Sale of Manufacturing Facility – In August 2006, we initiated a
project to reconfigure our printing operations to improve our printing services’
efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our printing services’
flexibility in order to increase external printing service sales. Our
reconfiguration plan included moving our printing operations a short distance
from its existing location to our corporate headquarters campus and the sale
of
the manufacturing facility and certain printing presses. During
fiscal 2007, we completed the sale of the manufacturing facility. The
sale price was $2.5 million and, after deducting customary closing costs, the
net proceeds to the Company from the sale totaled $2.3 million in
cash. The carrying value of the manufacturing facility at the date of
sale was approximately $1.1 million and we recognized a $1.2 million gain on
the
sale of the manufacturing facility during the quarter ended March 3,
2007.
Depreciation
and Amortization – Depreciation expense decreased
$0.3 million, or 8 percent, compared to the comparable period of fiscal 2006
primarily due to the full depreciation or disposal of certain property and
equipment (including retail stores) and the effects of significantly reduced
capital expenditures during the preceding fiscal years. These
decreases were partially offset by an impairment charge totaling $0.3 million
that we recorded during fiscal 2007 to reduce the carrying value of one of
our
printing presses that was sold to its anticipated sale price.
Amortization
expense from definite-lived intangible assets totaled $2.7 million compared
to
$2.9 million in the prior year and decreased due to certain intangible assets
becoming fully depreciated during the first two quarters of fiscal
2006. We anticipate that intangible asset amortization expense will
total $3.6 million in fiscal 2007.
Legal
Settlement
In
fiscal
2002, we filed legal action against World Marketing Alliance, Inc., a Georgia
corporation (WMA), and World Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and
purchaser of substantially all assets of WMA, for breach of
contract. The case proceeded to trial and the jury rendered a verdict
in our favor and against WMA for the entire unpaid contract amount of
approximately $1.1 million. In addition to the verdict, we recovered
legal fees totaling $0.3 million and pre- and post-judgment interest of $0.3
million from WMA. We received payment in cash from WMA for the total
verdict amount, including legal fees and interest. However, shortly
after paying the verdict amount, WMA appealed the jury decision to the 10th
Circuit Court of Appeals and we recorded receipt of the verdict amount plus
legal fees and interest with a corresponding increase to accrued liabilities
and
deferred the gain until the case was finally resolved. On December
30, 2005, we entered into a settlement agreement with WMA. Under the
terms of the settlement agreement, WMA agreed to dismiss its
appeal. As a result of this settlement agreement and dismissal of
WMA’s appeal, we recorded a $0.9 million gain from the legal settlement during
fiscal 2006, which is reflected in the condensed consolidated income statement
for the three quarters ended May 27, 2006.
Interest
Income and Expense
Interest
Income – Our interest income decreased by $0.3 million primarily
due to reduced cash and cash equivalents held during the quarter ended June
2,
2007. During the quarter ended June 2, 2007, we used substantially
all of our available cash and cash equivalents combined with proceeds from
a
newly acquired line of credit to redeem the remaining outstanding shares of
Series A preferred stock.
Interest
Expense – Interest expense increased $0.2 million compared to the
prior year primarily due to line of credit borrowings that were used in
conjunction with available cash to redeem the remaining shares of preferred
stock.
Income
Taxes
Our
income tax provision for the three quarters ended June 2, 2007 totaled $6.9
million compared to a tax benefit of $0.3 million in fiscal 2006. The
comparability of our current year income tax expense was primarily affected
by
the determination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 to reverse
substantially all of the valuation allowances on our deferred income tax
assets. Prior to the reversal of these valuation allowances, our
income tax provisions were affected by reductions in our deferred income tax
valuation allowance as we utilized net operating loss
carryforwards. The fiscal 2006 income tax provision was further
reduced by the reversal of tax contingency reserves during the third
quarter. No reversals of valuation allowance or tax contingency
reserves have occurred during fiscal 2007. Our effective tax rate for
the three quarters ended June 2, 2007 of approximately 50 percent was higher
than statutory combined rates primarily due to the accrual of taxable interest
income on the management stock loan program and withholding taxes on royalty
income from foreign licensees. Since the Company is currently
utilizing net operating loss carryforwards, we are unable to reduce our domestic
tax liability through the use of foreign tax credits, which normally result
from
the payment of foreign withholding taxes.
Preferred
Stock Dividends
Our
preferred stock dividends totaled $2.2 million for the three quarters ended
June
2, 2007 compared to $3.5 million during the same period of the prior
year. The decrease was due to fiscal 2006 preferred stock redemptions
totaling $20.0 million and the redemption of all remaining outstanding shares
of
preferred stock during the quarter ended June 2, 2007. We have no
further preferred dividend obligations following the fiscal 2007 redemption
of
the remaining preferred stock.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During
the quarter ended June 2, 2007, we used substantially all of our cash and cash
equivalents on hand in combination with proceeds from a newly acquired $25.0
million line of credit agreement to redeem all of the remaining outstanding
shares of our Series A preferred stock, which totaled $37.3 million, or
approximately 1.5 million shares. The shares of preferred stock were
redeemed at the liquidation preference of $25 per share, plus $0.3 million
of
dividends that were accrued through the redemption date. Although we
will incur interest charges from amounts borrowed to redeem the preferred stock,
our annual dividend obligation was reduced by $3.7 million, which the Company
believes will contribute to improved operating results and cash flows in future
periods.
At
June
2, 2007, our net working capital (current assets less current liabilities)
decreased to $7.2 million compared to $38.7 million at August 31,
2006. The decrease was primarily attributable to the redemption of
the remaining preferred stock, which significantly decreased our cash and cash
equivalents and increased current liabilities resulting from the new line of
credit financing. Despite the decrease in our working capital
resulting from the redemption of preferred stock, we believe that our liquidity
position remains good.
The
following discussion is a description of the primary factors affecting our
cash
flows and their effects upon our liquidity and capital resources during the
three quarters ended June 2, 2007.
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
Prior
to
the redemption of preferred stock, we relied nearly exclusively upon cash flows
from operating activities and cash on hand to maintain adequate liquidity and
working capital levels. In future periods, we expect cash flows from
operating activities to continue to provide a significant source of liquidity
and working capital as well as proceeds from our $25.0 million line of
credit. During the three quarters ended June 2, 2007, our net cash
provided by operating activities totaled $8.7 million compared to $9.9 million
for the same period of fiscal 2006. Our primary source of cash from
operating activities was the sale of goods and services to our customers in
the
normal course of business and the primary uses of cash for operating activities
were payments to suppliers for materials used in products sold, payments for
direct costs necessary to conduct training programs, and payments for selling,
general, and administrative expenses. Cash used for changes in
working capital during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 was primarily
related to 1) payments made to reduce accrued liabilities and accounts payable
from seasonally high August 31 balances; 2) increased accounts receivable
balances resulting from wholesale sales that occurred in May 2007 and improved
OSBU sales; and 3) purchases and production of inventory items earlier than
in
prior years in order to maintain adequate quantities on hand. We
believe that continued efforts to optimize working capital balances, combined
with existing and planned sales growth programs and cost-cutting initiatives,
will improve our cash flows from operating activities in future
periods. However, the success of these efforts, and their eventual
contribution to our cash flows, is dependent upon numerous factors, many of
which are not within our control.
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities and Capital Expenditures
Net
cash
used for investing activities totaled $9.5 million for the first three quarters
of fiscal 2007. Our primary uses of cash for investing activities
were comprised of purchases of property and equipment and further investment
in
curriculum development. Purchases of property and equipment, which
totaled $7.9 million, consisted primarily of payments for new printing presses
and related printing equipment resulting from the reconfiguration of our
printing services, additional computer software, leasehold improvements in
relocated stores and at the corporate campus for sublease tenants, and new
computer hardware. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2007, we
spent $4.2 million on further investment in curriculum development, primarily
related to new online learning modules and the development of new leadership
curriculum based upon principles found in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
People. Partially offsetting these uses of cash for investing
activities was the receipt of $2.6 million from sales of property and
equipment. The proceeds from sales of property and equipment were
generated primarily from the sale of our printing manufacturing facility and
certain printing equipment in connection with the reconfiguration of our
printing services.
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
Through
the three quarters ended June 2, 2007, our net cash used for financing
activities totaled $24.4 million. Our primary uses of cash for
financing activities were 1) the redemption of our remaining outstanding shares
of Series A preferred stock for $37.3 million; 2) the purchase of 328,000 shares
of our common stock for treasury, which totaled $2.5 million; 3) payment of
preferred stock dividends totaling $2.2 million; and 4) principal payments
totaling $0.4 million on our long-term debt and financing
obligation.
These
uses of cash for financing activities were partially offset by proceeds obtained
through a $25.0 million line of credit facility obtained during the quarter
ended June 2, 2007. Our net proceeds from the new line of credit
totaled $17.8 million for the period ended June 2, 2007.
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company has not structured any special purpose or variable interest entities,
or
participated in any commodity trading activities, which would expose us to
potential undisclosed liabilities or create adverse consequences to our
liquidity. At June 2, 2007, we did not have any undisclosed material
commitments for capital expenditures that would further reduce our
liquidity.
The
following table has been revised to reflect the decrease in projected dividend
payments and monitoring fees paid to a preferred stock investor as a result
of
the redemption of Series A preferred stock during the quarter ended June 2,
2007. The Company used cash on hand combined with proceeds from a
newly acquired $25.0 million line of credit to redeem the preferred
stock. The Company expects to repay amounts outstanding on the line
of credit agreement during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2007 and August
31,
2008 and the following table has been revised to reflect the expected repayment
of the line of credit. Contractual obligations in other captions
presented have not changed materially from those disclosed in our report on
Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006 and were not revised (in
thousands).
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
required payments to EDS for outsourcing services
|
$ |
17,217
|
$ |
15,901
|
$ |
15,927
|
$ |
15,577
|
$ |
15,298
|
$ |
73,233
|
$ |
153,153
|
||||||||||||||
Required
payments on corporate campus financing obligation
|
3,045
|
3,045
|
3,045
|
3,055
|
3,115
|
49,957
|
65,262
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
operating lease payments
|
8,475
|
7,228
|
5,564
|
4,012
|
2,402
|
6,013
|
33,694
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Line
of credit payments(5)
|
391
|
18,417
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
18,808
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend payments(1)
|
2,215
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,215
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Other
debt payments(2)
|
176
|
168
|
160
|
153
|
145
|
435
|
1,237
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
computer hardware purchases(3)
|
535
|
483
|
556
|
587
|
525
|
3,192
|
5,878
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Payments
for new printing services equipment(4)
|
3,137
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,137
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
10,523
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,523
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Monitoring
fees paid to a preferred stock investor(1)
|
97
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
97
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total
expected contractual
obligation
payments
|
$ |
45,811
|
$ |
45,242
|
$ |
25,252
|
$ |
23,384
|
$ |
21,485
|
$ |
132,830
|
$ |
294,004
|
(1)
|
Amount
reflects the redemption of all remaining Series A Preferred Stock
during
the quarter ended June 2, 2007.
|
(2)
|
The
Company’s variable rate debt payments include interest payments at 7.0
percent, which was the applicable interest rate at September 29,
2006.
|
(3)
|
We
are contractually obligated by our EDS outsourcing agreement to purchase
the necessary computer hardware to keep such equipment up to current
specifications. Amounts shown are estimated capital purchases
of computer hardware under terms of the EDS outsourcing agreement
and its
amendments.
|
(4)
|
In
August 2006, we signed contracts to purchase new printing equipment
for
$3.1 million in cash as part of a plan to reconfigure our printing
services operation. The payments were due at specified times
during fiscal 2007 that coincided with the installation and successful
operation of the new equipment.
|
(5)
|
Interest
expense on the line of credit payments was calculated at 6.4 percent,
which was the interest rate on the date of the preferred stock redemption,
and assumes that the June 2, 2007 line of credit balance and corresponding
interest will be repaid evenly through the fiscal year ended August
31,
2008.
|
Other
Items
Management
Common Stock Loan Program – The Company is the
creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow certain
management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of our common
stock. For further information regarding our management common stock
loan program, refer to Note 9 in our consolidated financial statements on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. The inability of the
Company to collect all, or a portion, of these receivables could have an adverse
impact upon our financial position and future cash flows compared to full
collection of the loans.
Availability
of Future Capital Resources – Going forward, we
will continue to incur costs necessary for the operation of the
business. We anticipate using cash on hand, cash provided by
operating activities, on the condition that we can continue generating positive
cash flows from operations, and other financing alternatives, as necessary,
for
these expenditures. We anticipate that our existing capital resources
should be adequate to enable us to maintain our operations for at least the
upcoming twelve months. However, our ability to maintain adequate
capital for our operations in the future is dependent upon a number of factors,
including sales trends, our ability to contain costs, levels of capital
expenditures, collection of accounts receivable, and other
factors. Some of the factors that influence our operations are not
within our control, such as economic conditions and the introduction of new
technology and products by our competitors. We will continue to
monitor our liquidity position and may pursue additional financing alternatives
to maintain sufficient resources for future operating and capital
requirements. However, there can be no assurance such financing
alternatives will be available to us on acceptable terms.
USE
OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
significant accounting polices that we used to prepare our consolidated
financial statements are outlined in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, which are presented in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on
Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. Some of those
accounting policies require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Management
regularly evaluates its estimates and assumptions and bases those estimates
and
assumptions on historical experience, factors that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, and requirements under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, including
changes in economic conditions and other circumstances that are not in our
control, but which may have an impact on these estimates and our actual
financial results.
The
following items require significant judgment and often involve complex
estimates:
Revenue
Recognition
We
derive
revenues primarily from the following sources:
·
|
Products
– We sell planners, binders, planner accessories, totes, handheld
electronic devices, and other related products that are primarily
sold
through our CSBU channels.
|
·
|
Training
and Consulting Services – We provide training and consulting
services to both organizations and individuals in strategic execution,
leadership, productivity, goal alignment, sales force performance,
and
communication effectiveness skills. These training programs and
services are primarily sold through our OSBU
channels.
|
The
Company recognizes revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, 2) delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered,
3)
the price to the customer is fixed and determinable, and 4) collectibility
is
reasonably assured. For product sales, these conditions are generally
met upon shipment of the product to the customer or by completion of the sale
transaction in a retail store. For training and service sales, these
conditions are generally met upon presentation of the training seminar or
delivery of the consulting services.
Some
of
our training and consulting contracts contain multiple deliverable elements
that
include training along with other products and services. In
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, sales
arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of
accounting if the deliverables in the sales contract meet the following
criteria: 1) the delivered training or product has value to the client on a
standalone basis; 2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value
of undelivered items; and 3) delivery of any undelivered item is
probable. The overall contract consideration is allocated among the
separate units of accounting based upon their fair values, with the amount
allocated to the delivered item being limited to the amount that is not
contingent upon the delivery of additional items or meeting other specified
performance conditions. If the fair value of all undelivered elements
exits, but fair value does not exist for one or more delivered elements, the
residual method is used. Under the residual method, the amount of
consideration allocated to the delivered items equals the total contract
consideration less the aggregate fair value of the undelivered
items. Fair value of the undelivered items is based upon the normal
pricing practices for the Company’s existing training programs, consulting
services, and other products, which are generally the prices of the items when
sold separately.
Revenue
is recognized on software sales in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP)
97-2, Software Revenue Recognition as amended by SOP
98-09. SOP 97-2, as amended, generally requires revenue earned on
software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software products
and
support to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair value of
the
elements based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE). The
majority of the Company’s software sales have elements, including a license and
post contract customer support (PCS). Currently, the Company does not
have VSOE for either the license or support elements of its software sales
and
software revenue is deferred until the only undelivered element is PCS and
the
total arrangement fee is recognized ratably over the support
period.
Our
international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where we
do
not have a directly-owned operation. Licensee companies are unrelated
entities that have been granted a license to translate the Company’s content and
curriculum, adapt the content and curriculum to the local culture, and sell
our
training seminars and products in a specific country or
region. Licensees are required to pay the Company royalties based
upon a percentage of the licensee’s sales. We recognize royalty
income each period based upon the sales information reported to us by the
licensees.
Revenue
is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts
for discounts and product returns.
Share-Based
Compensation
During
fiscal 2006, we granted performance based compensation awards to certain
employees in a Board of Director approved long-term incentive plan (the
LTIP). These performance-based share awards allow each participant
the right to receive a certain number of shares of common stock based upon
the
achievement of specified financial goals at the end of a predetermined
performance period. The LTIP awards vest on August 31 of the third
fiscal year from the grant date, which corresponds to the completion of a
three-year performance cycle. For example, the LTIP awards granted in
fiscal 2006 vest on August 31, 2008. The number of shares that are
finally awarded to LTIP participants is variable and is based entirely upon
the
achievement of a combination of performance objectives related to sales growth
and cumulative operating income during the performance period. Due to
the variable number of shares that may be issued under the LTIP, we reevaluate
the LTIP grants on a quarterly basis and adjust the number of shares expected
to
be awarded for each grant based upon financial results of the Company as
compared to the performance goals set for the award. Adjustments to
the number of shares awarded, and to the corresponding compensation expense,
are
based upon estimated future performance and are made on a cumulative basis
at
the date of adjustment based upon the probable number of shares to be
awarded.
The
Compensation Committee initially granted awards for 378,665 shares (the Target
Award) of common stock under the LTIP during fiscal 2006. However,
the actual number of shares finally awarded will range from zero shares, if
a
minimum level of performance is not achieved, to 200 percent of the target
award, if specifically defined performance criteria is achieved during the
three-year performance period. The minimum sales growth necessary for
participants to receive any shares under the fiscal 2006 LTIP is 7.5 percent
and
the minimum cumulative operating income is $36.2 million. The number
of shares finally awarded to LTIP participants under the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant
is based upon the combination of factors as shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
30.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
22.5%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
15.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
11.8
%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
7.5%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$36.20
|
$56.80
|
$72.30
|
$108.50
|
$144.60
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
Based
upon actual financial performance through June 2, 2007, the anticipated sale
of
the Company’s Mexico and Brazil subsidiaries, and estimated performance through
the remaining service period of the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant (fiscal 2007 and
2008), the number of performance awards granted during fiscal 2006 was decreased
to 182,779 shares, which resulted in a cumulative adjustment to decrease our
operating expenses by $0.1 million in the quarter ended June 2,
2007. At June 2, 2007, there was a total of $0.6 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to our fiscal 2006 LTIP
grant. The total compensation cost of the fiscal 2006 LTIP will be
equal to the number of shares finally issued multiplied by $6.60 per share,
which was the fair value of the common shares determined at the grant
date.
During
fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee granted performance awards for 429,312
shares of common stock under terms of the LTIP. Consistent with the
fiscal 2006 LTIP grant, the Company must achieve minimum levels of sales growth
and cumulative operating income in order for participants to receive any shares
under the LTIP grant. The minimum sales growth for the fiscal 2007
LTIP is 10.0 percent (fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2006) and the minimum
cumulative operating income total is $41.3 million and we will record
compensation expense using a 5 percent estimated forfeiture rate during the
vesting period. However, the total amount of compensation expense
recorded for the fiscal 2007 LTIP will equal the number of shares awarded
multiplied by $5.78 per share.
Based
primarily upon the anticipated sale of the Company’s Mexico and Brazil
subsidiaries, the number of performance awards granted in connection with the
fiscal 2007 grant was decreased to 357,617 shares, which resulted in a
cumulative adjustment to decrease our operating expenses by $0.1 million in
the
quarter ended June 2, 2007. At June 2, 2007 there was $1.6 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to the fiscal 2007 LTIP
grant. The number of shares finally awarded to LTIP participants
under the fiscal 2007 LTIP grant is based upon the combination of factors as
shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
40.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
30.0%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
20.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
15.7%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
10.0%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$41.30
|
$64.90
|
$82.60
|
$123.90
|
$165.20
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
The
evaluation of LTIP performance awards and corresponding use of estimated amounts
may produce additional volatility in our consolidated financial statements
as we
record cumulative adjustments to the estimated number of common shares to be
awarded under the LTIP grants. Actual results could differ from
estimates made during the service, or vesting, period.
We
estimate the value of our stock option awards on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. However, the Company did not
grant any stock options in the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 or in fiscal
years 2006 and 2005 and the remaining cost associated with our unvested stock
options at June 2, 2007 was insignificant.
Accounts
Receivable Valuation
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best
estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts
receivable balance. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts
based upon historical write-off experience and current economic conditions
and
we review the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular
basis. Receivable balances past due over 90 days, which exceed a
specified dollar amount, are reviewed individually for
collectibility. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the probability
for recovery is considered remote. We do not have any off-balance
sheet credit exposure related to our customers.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. Our inventories are comprised primarily
of dated calendar products and other non-dated products such as binders,
handheld electronic devices, stationery, training products, and other
accessories. Provision is made to reduce excess and obsolete
inventories to their estimated net realizable value. In assessing the
realization of inventories, we make judgments regarding future demand
requirements and compare these assessments with current and committed inventory
levels. Inventory requirements may change based on projected customer
demand, technological and product life cycle changes, longer or shorter than
expected usage periods, and other factors that could affect the valuation of
our
inventories.
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized, but rather
are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or
circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey
trade name intangible asset has been deemed to have an indefinite
life. This intangible asset is assigned to the OSBU and is tested for
impairment using the present value of estimated royalties on trade name related
revenues, which consist primarily of training seminars, international licensee
royalties, and related products. If forecasts and assumptions used to
support the realizability of our indefinite-lived intangible asset change in
the
future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect
our results of operations and financial condition. Based upon our
fiscal 2006 evaluation, our trade-name related revenues and licensee royalties
would have to suffer significant reductions before we would be required to
impair the Covey trade name.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an
estimate of undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over the remaining
useful lives in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is
recoverable. If the carrying values of the assets exceed the
anticipated future cash flows of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss
equal to the difference between the carrying values of the assets and their
estimated fair values. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at
the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are
independent from other groups of assets. The evaluation of long-lived
assets requires us to use estimates of future cash flows. If
forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our long-lived
tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in the future, significant
impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
Income
Taxes
The
Company regularly evaluates United States federal and various state and foreign
jurisdiction income tax exposures. The tax benefits of tax exposure
items are not recognized in the provision for income taxes unless it is probable
that the benefits will be sustained, without regard to the likelihood of tax
examination. A tax exposure reserve represents the difference between
the recognition of benefits related to exposure items for income tax reporting
purposes and financial reporting purposes. The tax exposure reserve
is classified as a component of the current income taxes payable
account. The Company adds interest and penalties, if applicable, each
period to the reserve.
The
Company recognizes the benefits of the tax exposure items in the financial
statements, that is, the reserve is reversed, when it becomes probable that
the
tax position will be sustained. To assess the probability of
sustaining a tax position, the Company considers all available positive
evidence. In many instances, sufficient positive evidence will not be
available until the expiration of the statute of limitations for audits by
taxing authorities, at which time the entire benefit will be recognized as
a
discrete item in the applicable period.
The
calculation of our income tax provision or benefit, as applicable, requires
estimates of future taxable income or losses. During the course of
the fiscal year, these estimates are compared to actual financial results and
adjustments may be made to our tax provision or benefit to reflect these revised
estimates.
The
Company continually assesses the need for valuation allowances against its
deferred income tax assets, considering recent profitability, known trends
and
events, and expected future transactions. For several years prior to the year
ended August 31, 2006, our history of significant operating losses precluded
us
from demonstrating that it was more likely than not that the related benefits
from deferred income tax deductions and foreign tax carryforwards would be
realized. Accordingly, we recorded valuation allowances on the
majority of our deferred income tax assets.
In
fiscal
2006 we reversed the majority of these valuation allowances. Due to
improved operating performance, business models, and expectations regarding
future taxable income, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than
not
that the benefits of domestic operating loss carryforwards, together with the
benefits of other deferred income tax assets will be realized. Thus,
we reversed the valuation allowances on certain of our domestic deferred income
tax assets, except for $2.2 million related to foreign tax credits.
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Uncertain
Tax Positions – In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109. This interpretation prescribes a consistent
recognition threshold and measurement standard, as well as criteria for
subsequently recognizing, derecognizing, and measuring tax positions for
financial statement purposes. This interpretation also requires
expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainties as they relate to income
tax accounting and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The cumulative effect from the adoption of FIN No. 48, if any,
will be an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the year of
adoption. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN No. 48 on
September 1, 2007 (fiscal 2008) and we are currently in the process of
evaluating the impact of FIN No. 48 on our financial statements.
Evaluation
of Misstatements – In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) released Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, which provides the
Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement
misstatements, such as assessing both the carryover and reversing effects of
prior year misstatements on the current year financial
statements. The guidance in SAB No. 108 is effective for our fiscal
year ended August 31, 2007. The Company has reviewed the provisions
of SAB No. 108 and is not currently aware of any conditions or errors that
would
have a material impact on our financial statements as a result of adopting
the
evaluation methodology found in SAB No. 108.
Fair
Value Measures – In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measures. This statement establishes a single
authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring
fair
value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value
measurements. Statement No. 157 only applies to fair-value
measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards except for measurements of share-based payments and measurements
that
are similar to, but not intended to be, fair value. This statement is
effective for the specified fair value measures for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will thus be effective
for our fiscal year beginning September 1, 2008. We have not yet
completed our analysis of the impact of SFAS No. 157 on our financial
statements.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments – In February 2007, The FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115. Statement No. 159 provides the option to measure eligible
financial instrument items, which are not otherwise required to be measured
at
fair value, at fair value. The decision to measure items at fair
value is made at specified election dates on an irrevocable
instrument-by-instrument basis. Changes in that instrument’s fair
value in subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current
earnings. If elected, the first measurement to fair value is reported
as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings
in
the year of adoption. Statement No. 159 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will
thus be effective for our fiscal year beginning September 1, 2008. We
have not yet completed our analysis of the impact of SFAS No. 159 on our
financial statements.
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995
Certain
written and oral statements made by the Company or our representatives in this
report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
press releases, conferences, internet webcasts, or otherwise, are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934 as amended (the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements
include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate,
or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and may contain words
such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” or words or
phrases of similar meaning. In our reports and filings we may make
forward looking statements regarding future product and training sales activity,
anticipated expenses, projected cost reduction and strategic initiatives,
expected levels of depreciation expense, expectations regarding tangible and
intangible asset valuation expenses, expected improvements in cash flows from
operating activities, the adequacy of our existing capital resources, future
compliance with the terms and conditions of our line of credit, expected fiscal
2008 repayment of the line of credit, estimated capital expenditures, and cash
flow estimates used to determine the fair value of long-lived
assets. These, and other forward-looking statements, are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements. These risks and
uncertainties are disclosed from time to time in reports filed by us with the
SEC, including reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K. Such risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the matters discussed in Item
1A
of our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006, entitled
“Risk Factors” and in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, also entitled “Risk
Factors.” In addition, such risks and uncertainties may include
unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following
areas: unanticipated costs or capital expenditures; difficulties
encountered by EDS in operating and maintaining our information systems and
controls, including without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply
planning, inventory control, and order fulfillment; delays or unanticipated
outcomes relating to our strategic plans; dependence on existing products or
services; the rate and consumer acceptance of new product introductions;
competition; the number and nature of customers and their product orders,
including changes in the timing or mix of product or training orders; pricing
of
our products and services and those of competitors; adverse publicity; and
other
factors which may adversely affect our business.
The
risks
included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may
include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and
financial performance, including the risk factors noted in Item 1A of our August
31, 2006 report on Form 10-K and in this Form 10-Q. Moreover, we
operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New
risk factors may emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict
all
such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on
our
business or the extent to which any single factor, or combination of factors,
may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties,
investors should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of
actual results.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile. In
addition, the stock markets in general have experienced increased
volatility. Factors such as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues
and earnings or losses and our failure to meet expectations could have a
significant impact on the market price of our common stock. In
addition, the price of our common stock can change for reasons unrelated to
our
performance. Due to our low market capitalization, the price of our
common stock may also be affected by conditions such as a lack of analyst
coverage and fewer potential investors.
Forward-looking
statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and the
Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any of these statements
in the future except as required by law. Actual future performance
and results will differ and may differ materially from that contained in or
suggested by forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth
in
this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.
ITEM
3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market
Risk of Financial Instruments
The
Company is exposed to financial instrument market risk primarily through
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest
rates. To manage risks associated with foreign currency exchange and
interest rates, we make limited use of derivative financial
instruments. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their
value from one or more underlying financial instruments. As a matter
of policy, our derivative instruments are entered into for periods consistent
with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions that
are
independent of those exposures. In addition, we do not enter into
derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes, nor are we party
to
any leveraged derivative instrument. The notional amounts of
derivatives do not represent actual amounts exchanged by the parties to the
instrument, and, thus, are not a measure of exposure to us through our use
of
derivatives. Additionally, we enter into derivative agreements only
with highly rated counterparties and we do not expect to incur any losses
resulting from non-performance by other parties.
Foreign
Currency Sensitivity
Due
to
the global nature of our operations, we are subject to risks associated with
transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the United States
dollar, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in foreign
currencies to United States dollars as a normal part of the reporting
process. The objective of our foreign currency risk management
activities is to reduce foreign currency risk in the consolidated financial
statements. In order to manage foreign currency risks, we make
limited use of foreign currency forward contracts and other foreign currency
related derivative instruments. Although we cannot eliminate all
aspects of our foreign currency risk, we believe that our strategy, which
includes the use of derivative instruments, can reduce the impacts of foreign
currency related issues on our consolidated financial statements. The
following is a description of our use of foreign currency derivative
instruments.
During
the quarter and three quarters ended June 2, 2007 we utilized foreign currency
forward contracts to manage the volatility of certain intercompany financing
transactions and other transactions that are denominated in foreign
currencies. Because these contracts do not meet specific hedge
accounting requirements, gains and losses on these contracts, which expire
on a
quarterly basis, are recognized currently and are used to offset a portion
of
the gains or losses of the related accounts. The gains and losses on
these contracts were recorded as a component of SG&A expense in our
consolidated income statements and had the following impact on the periods
indicated (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Three
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
June
2,
2007
|
May
27,
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Losses
on foreign exchange contracts
|
$ | (137 | ) | $ | (208 | ) | $ | (210 | ) | $ | (276 | ) | ||||
Gains
on foreign exchange contracts
|
49
|
33
|
82
|
256
|
||||||||||||
Net
losses on foreign exchange contracts
|
$ | (88 | ) | $ | (175 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | $ | (20 | ) |
At
June
2, 2007, the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts, which was
determined using the estimated amount at which contracts could be settled based
upon forward market exchange rates, was insignificant. The notional
amounts of our foreign currency sell contracts that did not qualify for hedge
accounting were as follows at June 2, 2007 (in thousands):
Contract
Description
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Notional
Amount in U.S. Dollars
|
||||||
Japanese
Yen
|
100,000
|
$ |
821
|
|||||
Mexican
Pesos
|
7,600
|
717
|
||||||
Australian
Dollars
|
480
|
398
|
During
the quarter and three quarters ended June 2, 2007, we did not utilize any
derivative contracts that qualified for hedge accounting. However,
the Company may utilize net investment hedge contracts or other foreign currency
derivatives in future periods as a component of our overall foreign currency
risk strategy.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The
Company is exposed to fluctuations in U.S. interest rates primarily as a result
of our line of credit borrowings. At June 2, 2007, our debt balances
consisted primarily of a fixed-rate financing obligation associated with the
sale of our corporate headquarters facility, a variable-rate line of credit
arrangement, and a variable rate long-term mortgage on certain of our buildings
and property. The addition of the variable-rate line of credit
increased our interest rate sensitivity and in the future our overall interest
rate sensitivity will be influenced by the amounts borrowed on the line of
credit and the prevailing interest rates, which may create additional expense
if
interest rates increase in future periods. Accordingly, at June 2,
2007 borrowing levels, a 1 percent increase on our variable rate debt would
increase our interest expense over the next year by approximately $0.2
million.
During
the quarter and three quarters ended June 2, 2007 we were not party to any
interest rate swap or other interest related derivative instruments that would
increase our interest rate sensitivity.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating
the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q.
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1A. RISK FACTORS
Our
cash balances have significantly decreased, which may reduce our ability to
adequately respond to future adverse changes in our business and
operations
During
the quarter ended June 2, 2007, we utilized substantially all of our available
cash on hand combined with proceeds from a newly acquired line of credit to
redeem all of the remaining outstanding shares of Series A preferred
stock. As a consequence of this transaction, our cash balances have
significantly decreased, which may reduce our ability to adequately respond
to
future adverse changes in our business and operations, whether anticipated
or
unanticipated.
Failure
to comply with the terms and conditions of our credit facility may have an
adverse effect upon our business and operations
Our
newly
acquired line of credit facility requires us to be in compliance with customary
non-financial terms and conditions as well as specified financial
ratios. Failure to comply with these terms and conditions or maintain
adequate financial performance to comply with specific financial ratios entitles
the lenders to certain remedies, including the right to immediately call due
any
amounts outstanding on the line of credit. Such events would have an
adverse effect upon our business and operations as there can be no assurance
that we may be able to obtain other forms of financing or raise additional
capital on terms that would be acceptable to us.
For
further information regarding our Risk Factors, refer to Item 1A in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2006.
Item
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
The
Company acquired the following shares of its outstanding securities during
the
fiscal quarter ended June 2, 2007:
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans
or
Programs
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Common
Shares:
|
||||||||||||||||
March
4, 2007 to April 7, 2007
|
-
|
$ |
-
|
none
|
$ |
2,413
|
||||||||||
April
8, 2007 to May 5, 2007
|
54 | (2) |
7.01
|
none
|
2,413
|
|||||||||||
May
6, 2007 to June 2, 2007
|
-
|
-
|
none
|
2,413 | (1) | |||||||||||
Total
Common Shares
|
54
|
$ |
7.01
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Total
Preferred Shares
|
1,493,776 | (3) | $ |
25.00
|
(1)
|
In
January 2006, our Board of Directors approved the purchase of up
to $10.0
million of our outstanding common stock. All previous
authorized common stock purchase plans were canceled. Following
the approval of this common stock purchase plan, we have purchased
a total
of 1,009,300 shares of our common stock for $7.6 million through
June 2,
2007.
|
(2)
|
Amount
represents shares withheld for statutory taxes from a distribution
of
common shares to a participant in our non-qualified deferred compensation
plan.
|
(3)
|
On
April 4, 2007, we redeemed the remaining outstanding shares of Series
A
Preferred Stock at its liquidation preference of $25.00 per share
plus
accrued dividends through the redemption
date.
|
Item
6. EXHIBITS
10.1
|
Revolving
Line of Credit Agreement ($18,000,000) by and between JPMorgan Chase
Bank,
N.A. and Franklin Covey Co. dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit
10.1
to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.2
|
Secured
Promissory Note between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Franklin Covey
Co.
dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.2 to Current Report
on Form
8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
19, 2007
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.3
|
Security
Agreement between Franklin Covey Co., Franklin Covey Printing, Inc.,
Franklin Development Corporation, Franklin Covey Travel, Inc., Franklin
Covey Catalog Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Franklin
Covey Product Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Services LLC, Franklin
Covey
Marketing, LTD., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Zions First National
Bank, dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.3 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 19,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.4
|
Repayment
Guaranty between Franklin Covey Co., Franklin Covey Printing, Inc.,
Franklin Development Corporation, Franklin Covey Travel, Inc., Franklin
Covey Catalog Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Franklin
Covey Product Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Services LLC, Franklin
Covey
Marketing, LTD., and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., dated March 14, 2007
(attached as exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed
with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
10.5
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement between Franklin Covey Co. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank,
N.A. and Zions First National Bank, dated March 14, 2007 (attached
as
exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
10.6
|
Revolving
Line of Credit Agreement ($7,000,000) by and between Zions First
National
Bank and Franklin Covey Co. dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit
10.6
to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.7
|
Secured
Promissory Note between Zions First National Bank and Franklin Covey
Co.
dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.7 to Current Report
on Form
8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
19, 2007
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.8
|
Repayment
Guaranty between Franklin Covey Co., Franklin Covey Printing, Inc.,
Franklin Development Corporation, Franklin Covey Travel, Inc., Franklin
Covey Catalog Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Franklin
Covey Product Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Services LLC, Franklin
Covey
Marketing, LTD., and Zions First National Bank, dated March 14, 2007
(attached as exhibit 10.8 to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed
with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
10.9
|
Credit
Agreement between Franklin Covey Canada, Ltd. and Toronto-Dominion
Bank
dated February 19, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.9 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 19,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
|
||||
Date:
|
July
12, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
ROBERT A. WHITMAN
|
|
Robert
A. Whitman
|
||||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||||
Date:
|
July
12, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
STEPHEN D. YOUNG
|
|
Stephen
D. Young
|
||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||||