FRANKLIN COVEY CO - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended March 3, 2007
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
file no. 1-11107
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Utah
(State
of incorporation)
|
87-0401551
(I.R.S.
employer identification number)
|
|
2200
West Parkway Boulevard
Salt
Lake City, Utah
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
84119-2099
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number,
Including
area code
|
(801) 817-1776 |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated
filer
|
x
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o
No
x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock
as of the latest practicable date:
19,412,421
shares of Common Stock as of April 2, 2007
INDEX
Part
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Note
1.
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
||
Note
2.
|
Inventories
|
||
Note
3.
|
Canadian
Line of Credit
|
||
Note
4.
|
Shareholders’
Equity
|
||
Note
5.
|
Sale
of Manufacturing Facility
|
||
Note
6.
|
Income
Taxes
|
||
Note
7.
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
||
Note
8.
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
||
Note
9.
|
Segment
Information
|
||
Note
10.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
||
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities & Use of Proceeds
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
||
Signatures
|
PART
I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
March
3,
2007
|
August
31,
2006
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
28,620
|
$
|
30,587
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $656 and $979
|
24,678
|
24,254
|
|||||
Inventories
|
23,402
|
21,790
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,884
|
4,130
|
|||||
Other
current assets
|
6,387
|
6,359
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
86,971
|
87,120
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
35,054
|
33,318
|
|||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
77,725
|
79,532
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
364
|
4,340
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
13,965
|
12,249
|
|||||
$
|
214,079
|
$
|
216,559
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt and financing obligation
|
$
|
598
|
$
|
585
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
10,211
|
13,769
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
2,659
|
1,924
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
30,538
|
32,170
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
44,006
|
48,448
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and financing obligation, less current portion
|
33,209
|
33,559
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,017
|
1,203
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
78,232
|
83,210
|
|||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock - Series A, no par value; 4,000 shares authorized, 1,494
shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference totaling
$38,278
|
37,345
|
37,345
|
|||||
Common
stock - $0.05 par value; 40,000 shares authorized, 27,056
shares issued and outstanding
|
1,353
|
1,353
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
186,288
|
185,691
|
|||||
Common
stock warrants
|
7,611
|
7,611
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
18,337
|
14,075
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
669
|
653
|
|||||
Treasury
stock at cost, 7,386 and 7,083 shares
|
(115,756
|
)
|
(113,379
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
135,847
|
133,349
|
|||||
$
|
214,079
|
$
|
216,559
|
||||
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Quarter
Ended
|
Two
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
|||||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
45,283
|
$
|
50,841
|
$
|
87,391
|
$
|
94,244
|
|||||
Training
and consulting services
|
31,593
|
27,492
|
65,014
|
56,440
|
|||||||||
76,876
|
78,333
|
152,405
|
150,684
|
||||||||||
Cost
of sales:
|
|||||||||||||
Products
|
19,436
|
22,288
|
37,910
|
40,952
|
|||||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
10,251
|
7,872
|
20,909
|
17,152
|
|||||||||
29,687
|
30,160
|
58,819
|
58,104
|
||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
47,189
|
48,173
|
93,586
|
92,580
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
36,666
|
35,488
|
77,514
|
73,255
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of manufacturing facility
|
(1,227
|
)
|
-
|
(1,227
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Depreciation
|
1,366
|
1,221
|
2,403
|
2,629
|
|||||||||
Amortization
|
900
|
908
|
1,802
|
2,003
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
9,484
|
10,556
|
13,094
|
14,693
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
357
|
316
|
557
|
645
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(675
|
)
|
(660
|
)
|
(1,336
|
)
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|||||
Legal
settlement
|
-
|
873
|
-
|
873
|
|||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
9,166
|
11,085
|
12,315
|
14,908
|
|||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
(4,452
|
)
|
(1,872
|
)
|
(6,186
|
)
|
(2,462
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
4,714
|
9,213
|
6,129
|
12,446
|
|||||||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(934
|
)
|
(1,139
|
)
|
(1,867
|
)
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
3,780
|
$
|
8,074
|
$
|
4,262
|
$
|
9,928
|
|||||
Net
income available to common
shareholders
per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
.19
|
$
|
.40
|
$
|
.22
|
$
|
.49
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
.19
|
$
|
.39
|
$
|
.21
|
$
|
.48
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of common shares:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
19,589
|
20,311
|
19,750
|
20,321
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
20,026
|
20,634
|
20,109
|
20,638
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
Two
Quarters Ended
|
|||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
6,129
|
$
|
12,446
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,977
|
5,571
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,218
|
-
|
|||||
Gain
on disposals of property and equipment
|
(1,210
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
622
|
235
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Increase
in accounts receivable, net
|
(433
|
)
|
(774
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in inventories
|
(1,616
|
)
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
(increase) in other assets
|
728
|
(134
|
)
|
||||
Decrease
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(5,196
|
)
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in other long-term liabilities
|
(175
|
)
|
(102
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in income taxes payable
|
743
|
1,526
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
8,787
|
11,225
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(5,377
|
)
|
(2,422
|
)
|
|||
Curriculum
development costs
|
(3,163
|
)
|
(961
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sales of property and equipment
|
2,258
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash used for investing activities
|
(6,282
|
)
|
(3,383
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt and financing obligation
|
(297
|
)
|
(822
|
)
|
|||
Change
in restricted cash
|
-
|
699
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of common stock from treasury
|
137
|
173
|
|||||
Proceeds
from management stock loan payments
|
-
|
134
|
|||||
Redemption
of preferred stock
|
-
|
(20,000
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of treasury shares
|
(2,539
|
)
|
(224
|
)
|
|||
Payment
of preferred stock dividends
|
(1,867
|
)
|
(3,018
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used for financing activities
|
(4,566
|
)
|
(23,058
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
94
|
(120
|
)
|
||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,967
|
)
|
(15,336
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
|
30,587
|
51,690
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of the period
|
$
|
28,620
|
$
|
36,354
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
1,324
|
$
|
1,337
|
|||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$
|
1,270
|
$
|
1,093
|
|||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Accrued
preferred stock dividends
|
$
|
934
|
$
|
934
|
|||
Capital
lease financing of property and equipment purchases
|
-
|
109
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FRANKLIN
COVEY CO.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 1 - | BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
Franklin
Covey Co. (hereafter referred to as us, we, our, or the Company) provides
integrated consulting, training, and performance enhancement solutions to
organizations and individuals in strategy execution, productivity, leadership,
sales force effectiveness, effective communications, and other areas. Each
integrated solution may include components of training and consulting,
assessment, and other application tools that are generally available in
electronic or paper-based formats. Our products and services are available
through professional consulting services, public seminars, retail stores,
catalogs, and the internet at www.franklincovey.com.
Historically, the Company’s best-known offerings include the FranklinCovey
Planner™ and a suite of individual-effectiveness and leadership-development
training products based on the best-selling book, The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People.
We also
offer a range of training and assessment products to help organizations achieve
superior results by focusing and executing on top priorities, building the
capability of knowledge workers, and aligning business processes. These
offerings include the popular workshop FOCUS:
Achieving Your Highest Priorities™,
The
4
Disciplines of Execution™,
The
4
Roles of Leadership™,
Building
Business Acumen: What the CEO Wants You to Know™,
the
Advantage Series communication workshops, and the Execution
Quotient
(xQ™)
organizational assessment tool. During fiscal 2007 we have also introduced
a new
leadership program based upon principles found in The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect,
in
the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results
of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. The information included
in
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
dates
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company utilizes a modified 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on August 31 of
each year. Corresponding quarterly periods generally consist of 13-week periods
that will end on December 2, 2006, March 3, 2007, and June 2, 2007 during fiscal
2007. Under the modified 52/53-week fiscal year, the quarter ended March 3,
2007
had one fewer business day compared to the quarter ended February 25, 2006
and
the two quarters ended March 3, 2007 had four additional business days compared
to the two quarters ended February 25, 2006.
The
results of operations for the quarter and two quarters ended March 3, 2007
are
not necessarily indicative of results expected for the entire fiscal year ending
August 31, 2007.
NOTE 2 - |
INVENTORIES
|
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the
first-in, first-out method, and were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
March
3,
2007
|
August
31,
2006
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
19,994
|
$
|
18,464
|
|||
Work
in process
|
523
|
706
|
|||||
Raw
materials
|
2,885
|
2,620
|
|||||
$
|
23,402
|
$
|
21,790
|
NOTE 3 - | CANADIAN LINE OF CREDIT |
In
addition to the lines of credit described in Note 10,
we
obtained a CDN $500,000 (approximately $425,300) revolving line of credit with
a
Canadian Bank through our wholly owned Canadian subsidiary (the Canadian Line
of
Credit) during the quarter ended March 3, 2007. The Canadian Line of Credit
bears interest at the Canadian prime rate and is a revolving line of credit
that
may be repeatedly borrowed against and repaid during the life of the agreement.
The Canadian Line of Credit may be used for general corporate purposes and
requires our Canadian subsidiary to maintain a specified financial covenant
for
minimum debt service coverage or the payment of the loan may be accelerated.
As
of March 3, 2007 we had not yet drawn upon the Canadian Line of
Credit.
In
connection with the Canadian Line of Credit, the interest rate on a previously
existing mortgage agreement with the same Canadian Bank was reduced from the
Canadian prime rate plus one percent to the Canadian prime rate. All other
terms
on the existing Canadian mortgage remained the same and the Company does not
believe that the one percent decrease in the interest rate represents a material
modification to terms of the loan.
NOTE 4 - |
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
During
the quarter ended March 3, 2007, we purchased 328,000
shares
of our common stock for $2.5
million
under the terms of a previously approved $10.0 million common stock purchase
plan. Through March 3, 2007, we have purchased a total of 1,009,300
shares
of our common stock for $7.6
million
as part of this purchase plan.
NOTE 5 - |
SALE
OF MANUFACTURING FACILITY
|
In
August
2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations to improve
our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our
printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing service
sales. Our reconfiguration plan includes moving our printing operations a short
distance from its existing location to our corporate headquarters campus and
the
sale of the manufacturing facility and certain printing presses. Other existing
presses will be moved to the new location as part of the reconfiguration plan.
Because the manufacturing facility and printing presses were not available
for
immediate sale as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
these
assets were not classified as held for sale in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets at December 2, 2006 or August 31, 2006.
During
the quarter ended March 3, 2007, we completed the sale of the manufacturing
facility. The sale price was $2.5
million
and, after deducting customary closing costs, the net proceeds to the Company
from the sale totaled $2.3
million
in cash. The carrying value of the manufacturing facility at the date of
sale
was approximately $1.1
million
and accordingly, we recognized a $1.2
million
gain on the sale of the manufacturing facility during the quarter. The
manufacturing facility assets sold were primarily reported as a component
of
corporate assets for segment reporting purposes. Due to a lower-than-expected
sale price on one of the printing presses to be sold, we recorded an impairment
charge totaling $0.3
million
during the quarter ended March 3, 2007 to reduce the carrying value of
the
printing press to its anticipated sale price. The impairment charge was
included
as a component of depreciation expense in our condensed consolidated income
statements for the quarter and two quarters ended March 3,
2007.
NOTE 6 - | INCOME TAXES |
In
order
to determine our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated
annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income and
statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain
significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter during
which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate
from quarter to quarter.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that it was appropriate
to
reverse substantially all of the valuation allowances on our deferred income
tax
assets. Prior to the reversal of these valuation allowances, our income tax
provisions were affected by reductions in our deferred income tax valuation
allowance as we utilized net operating loss carryforwards. Accordingly, our
income tax provision was $4.5
million
in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and was $6.2
million
for the two quarters ended March 3, 2007. Our effective tax rate for the
two
quarters ended March 3, 2007 of approximately 50 percent was higher than
statutory combined rates primarily due to the accrual of taxable interest
income
on the management stock loan program and withholding taxes on royalty income
from foreign licensees.
NOTE 7 - |
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
Comprehensive
income is based on net income and includes charges and credits to equity
accounts that were not the result of transactions with shareholders.
Comprehensive income for the Company was calculated as follows (in
thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Two
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
4,714
|
$
|
9,213
|
$
|
6,129
|
$
|
12,446
|
|||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss) items, net of tax:
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(80
|
)
|
145
|
16
|
(220
|
)
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
4,634
|
$
|
9,358
|
$
|
6,145
|
$
|
12,226
|
NOTE 8 - |
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
Basic
earnings per common share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income available
to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income
available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding plus the assumed exercise of all dilutive securities using the
treasury stock method or the “as converted” method, as appropriate. Due to the
modifications to our management stock loan program made during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that the shares of management stock loan
participants which were placed in the escrow account are participating
securities as defined by Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 03-6,
Participating
Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.
128,
because
they continue to have equivalent common stock dividend rights. Accordingly,
these management stock loan shares are included in our basic EPS calculation
during periods of net income and excluded from the basic EPS calculation in
periods of net loss.
The
following table presents the computation of our EPS for the periods indicated
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
Quarter
Ended
|
Two
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
||||||||||
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
4,714
|
$
|
9,213
|
$
|
6,129
|
$
|
12,446
|
|||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(934
|
)
|
(1,139
|
)
|
(1,867
|
)
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
3,780
|
$
|
8,074
|
$
|
4,262
|
$
|
9,928
|
|||||
Denominator
for basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
19,589
|
20,311
|
19,750
|
20,321
|
|||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options
|
24
|
45
|
29
|
46
|
|||||||||
Unvested
stock awards
|
257
|
272
|
252
|
268
|
|||||||||
Performance
awards
|
156
|
6
|
78
|
3
|
|||||||||
Common
stock warrants(2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Diluted
weighted average shares outstanding
|
20,026
|
20,634
|
20,109
|
20,638
|
|||||||||
Basic
and diluted EPS:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$
|
.19
|
$
|
.40
|
$
|
.22
|
$
|
.49
|
|||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$
|
.19
|
$
|
.39
|
$
|
.21
|
$
|
.48
|
(1) | Since the Company recognized net income for the quarter and two quarters ended March 3, 2007, basic weighted average shares for those periods include 3.5 million shares of common stock held by management stock loan participants that were placed in escrow. | |
(2) |
For
the quarter and two quarters ended March 3, 2007, the conversion
of 6.2
million common stock warrants is not assumed because such conversion
would
be anti-dilutive.
|
At
March
3, 2007 and February 25, 2006, we had approximately 2.0
million
stock options outstanding which were not included in the computation of diluted
EPS because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market
price of the Company’s common shares for the respective periods. Although these
shares were not included in our calculation of diluted EPS, these stock options,
and other dilutive securities, may have a dilutive effect on the Company’s EPS
calculation in future periods if the price of our common stock
increases.
NOTE 9 - |
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
The
Company has two segments: the Consumer Solutions Business Unit (CSBU) and the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit (OSBU). The following is a description
of
our segments, their primary operating components, and their significant business
activities:
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit - This
business unit is primarily focused on sales to individual customers
and
small business organizations and includes the results of our domestic
retail stores, consumer direct operations (primarily catalog, eCommerce,
and public seminar programs), wholesale operations, international
product
channels in certain countries, and other related distribution channels,
including government product sales and domestic printing and publishing
sales. The CSBU results of operations also include the financial
results
of our paper planner manufacturing operations. Although CSBU sales
primarily consist of products such as planners, binders, software,
totes,
and related accessories, virtually any component of our leadership,
productivity, and strategy execution solutions may be purchased through
our CSBU channels.
|
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit - The
OSBU is primarily responsible for the development, marketing, sale,
and
delivery of strategic execution, productivity, leadership, sales
force
performance, and communication training and consulting solutions
directly
to organizational clients, including other companies, the government,
and
educational institutions. The OSBU includes the financial results
of our
domestic sales force and certain international operations. The domestic
sales force is responsible for the sale and delivery of our training
and
consulting services in the United States. Our international sales
group
includes the financial results of our directly owned foreign offices
and
royalty revenues from licensees.
|
The
Company’s chief operating decision maker is the CEO, and each of the segments
has a president who reports directly to the CEO. The primary measurement tool
used in business unit performance analysis is earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), which may not be calculated as
similarly titled amounts calculated by other companies. For segment reporting
purposes, the Company’s consolidated EBITDA can be calculated as its income from
operations excluding depreciation expense, amortization expense, and the gain
on
sale of manufacturing facility.
In
the
normal course of business, we may make structural and cost allocation revisions
to our segment information to reflect new reporting responsibilities within
the
organization. During fiscal 2007, we transferred the international product
channels in certain countries from OSBU to CSBU and made other less significant
organizational changes. All prior period segment information has been revised
to
conform to the most recent classifications and organizational changes. The
Company accounts for its segment information on the same basis as the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements.
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
March
3, 2007
|
Sales
to External Customers
|
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
19,265
|
$
|
11,861
|
$
|
4,635
|
$
|
186
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
17,062
|
9,940
|
7,645
|
54
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
3,581
|
1,932
|
1,747
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
2,643
|
1,608
|
709
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,583
|
410
|
(6,447
|
)
|
533
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
44,134
|
25,751
|
8,289
|
773
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
19,313
|
12,320
|
1,730
|
151
|
900
|
|||||||||||
International
|
13,429
|
9,118
|
3,030
|
204
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
32,742
|
21,438
|
4,760
|
355
|
900
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
76,876
|
47,189
|
13,049
|
1,128
|
900
|
|||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(2,526
|
)
|
238
|
-
|
||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
76,876
|
$
|
47,189
|
$
|
10,523
|
$
|
1,366
|
$
|
900
|
||||||
Quarter
Ended
February
25, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
23,781
|
$
|
14,306
|
$
|
5,593
|
$
|
337
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
19,613
|
11,621
|
9,353
|
15
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
3,138
|
1,675
|
1,523
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
2,681
|
1,663
|
776
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,291
|
133
|
(7,267
|
)
|
309
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
50,504
|
29,398
|
9,978
|
661
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
15,347
|
10,362
|
1,471
|
88
|
907
|
|||||||||||
International
|
12,482
|
8,413
|
3,181
|
320
|
1
|
|||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
27,829
|
18,775
|
4,652
|
408
|
908
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
78,333
|
48,173
|
14,630
|
1,069
|
908
|
|||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(1,945
|
)
|
152
|
-
|
||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
78,333
|
$
|
48,173
|
$
|
12,685
|
$
|
1,221
|
$
|
908
|
||||||
Two
Quarters Ended
March
3, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
33,392
|
$
|
20,260
|
$
|
5,834
|
$
|
377
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
36,998
|
22,218
|
17,637
|
78
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
8,158
|
4,710
|
4,409
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
5,029
|
3,093
|
1,195
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
2,877
|
154
|
(15,907
|
)
|
792
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
86,454
|
50,435
|
13,168
|
1,247
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
37,034
|
23,741
|
2,089
|
261
|
1,802
|
|||||||||||
International
|
28,917
|
19,410
|
6,217
|
409
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
65,951
|
43,151
|
8,306
|
670
|
1,802
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
152,405
|
93,586
|
21,474
|
1,917
|
1,802
|
|||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(5,402
|
)
|
486
|
-
|
||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
152,405
|
$
|
93,586
|
$
|
16,072
|
$
|
2,403
|
$
|
1,802
|
||||||
Two
Quarters Ended
February
25, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
38,424
|
$
|
22,983
|
$
|
5,967
|
$
|
773
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Consumer
direct
|
38,789
|
23,299
|
18,890
|
26
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
9,250
|
4,476
|
4,180
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
5,325
|
3,404
|
1,655
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
2,454
|
512
|
(15,654
|
)
|
657
|
57
|
||||||||||
Total
CSBU
|
94,242
|
54,674
|
15,038
|
1,456
|
57
|
|||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
31,677
|
20,931
|
1,908
|
173
|
1,943
|
|||||||||||
International
|
24,765
|
16,975
|
6,250
|
651
|
3
|
|||||||||||
Total
OSBU
|
56,442
|
37,906
|
8,158
|
824
|
1,946
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating segments
|
150,684
|
92,580
|
23,196
|
2,280
|
2,003
|
|||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
-
|
-
|
(3,871
|
)
|
349
|
-
|
||||||||||
Consolidated
|
$
|
150,684
|
$
|
92,580
|
$
|
19,325
|
$
|
2,629
|
$
|
2,003
|
||||||
A
reconciliation of operating segment EBITDA to consolidated income before taxes
is provided below (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Two
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
||||||||||
Reportable
segment EBITDA
|
$
|
13,049
|
$
|
14,630
|
$
|
21,474
|
$
|
23,196
|
|||||
Corporate
expenses
|
(2,526
|
)
|
(1,945
|
)
|
(5,402
|
)
|
(3,871
|
)
|
|||||
Consolidated
EBITDA
|
10,523
|
12,685
|
16,072
|
19,325
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of manufacturing facility
|
1,227
|
-
|
1,227
|
-
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
(1,366
|
)
|
(1,221
|
)
|
(2,403
|
)
|
(2,629
|
)
|
|||||
Amortization
|
(900
|
)
|
(908
|
)
|
(1,802
|
)
|
(2,003
|
)
|
|||||
Income
from operations
|
9,484
|
10,556
|
13,094
|
14,693
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
357
|
316
|
557
|
645
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(675
|
)
|
(660
|
)
|
(1,336
|
)
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|||||
Legal
settlement
|
-
|
873
|
-
|
873
|
|||||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
$
|
9,166
|
$
|
11,085
|
$
|
12,315
|
$
|
14,908
|
NOTE 10 - |
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
Line
of Credit Agreement
On
March
14, 2007, we entered into long-term secured revolving line-of-credit agreements
with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Zions First National Bank (the Credit
Agreements). The Credit Agreements provide a total of $25.0
million
of borrowing capacity to the Company at an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus
1.10
percent.
The Credit Agreements expire on March 14, 2010 and we may draw on the credit
facilities, repay, and draw again, on a revolving basis, up to the maximum
loan
amount of $25.0
million
so long as no event of default has occurred and is continuing. The Credit
Agreements also contain customary representations and guarantees as well as
provisions for repayment and liens.
The
Credit Agreements require us to be in compliance with specified financial
covenants, including: (i) a funded debt to earnings ratio; (ii) a fixed charge
coverage ratio; (iii) a limitation on annual capital expenditures; and (iv)
a
defined amount of minimum net worth. In the event of noncompliance with these
financial covenants and other defined events of default, the lenders are
entitled to certain remedies, including acceleration of the repayment of amounts
outstanding on the Credit Agreements.
In
connection with the Credit Agreements, the Company entered into separate
Promissory Notes, a Security Agreement, Repayment Guaranty Agreements, and
a
Pledge and Security Agreement. These agreements pledge substantially all of
the
Company’s assets located in the United States and a certain foreign location to
the lenders in the Credit Agreements.
The
Company may use the Credit Agreements for general corporate purposes and
subsequent to March 3, 2007 we used a portion of the credit available through
the Credit Agreements to redeem the remaining shares of our outstanding Series
A
Preferred Stock as described below.
Redemption
of Series A Preferred Stock
Subsequent
to March 3, 2007, we redeemed all remaining outstanding shares of Series A
Preferred Stock, which totaled $37.3
million,
or approximately 1.5
million
shares. The shares of preferred stock were redeemed at the liquidation
preference of $25
per
share, plus $0.3
million
of dividends accrued through the redemption date. The redemption of Series
A
Preferred Stock will reduce our annual dividend obligation by $3.7
million.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Management’s
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are
based upon management’s current expectations and are subject to various
uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking
statements are set forth below under the heading “Safe Harbor Statement Under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.”
The
Company suggests that the following discussion and analysis be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2006.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Our
second fiscal quarter, which includes the months of December, January, and
February, has historically reflected strong product sales, primarily from
holiday shopping, and generally good training and consulting service sales.
However, our product sales for the quarter ended March 3, 2007 were adversely
affected by our modified 52/53 week fiscal calendar, which placed the seasonally
busy sales week following the Thanksgiving holiday into our first quarter
of
fiscal 2007 rather than in our second quarter as was reported in fiscal 2006.
For the quarter ended March 3, 2007, our income from operations, which includes
a $1.2
million
gain from the sale of a manufacturing facility, decreased to $9.5
million
compared to $10.6
million
in the prior year and our pre-tax income declined to $9.2
million
compared to $11.1
million
in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Due primarily to an increase in our
effective tax rate, which was partially offset by reduced preferred stock
dividends, our net income available to common shareholders decreased to
$3.8
million
compared to $8.1
million
in the corresponding quarter of fiscal 2006.
The
primary factors that influenced our operating results in the quarter ended
March
3, 2007 were as follows:
·
|
Sales
- Consolidated
training and consulting services sales increased $4.1
million primarily due to increased sales of our new leadership program
based upon the principles found in The
7 Habits of Highly Effective People,
improved sales effectiveness training sales, increased strategy execution
sales, and increased international sales. Product sales declined
$5.6
million primarily due to reduced retail sales resulting from 10 fewer
retail stores being open during the quarter compared to the prior
year,
reduced sales through our consumer direct channels, and the effects
of our
modified 52/53 week fiscal calendar as discussed above.
|
·
|
Gross
Profit
-
Our consolidated gross profit totaled $47.2
million for the quarter ended March 3, 2007 compared to $48.2
million in the prior year. Our consolidated gross margin, which is
gross
profit in terms of a percentage of sales, remained consistent at
61.4
percent of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to
61.5
percent of sales in fiscal 2006. Although product sales declined
compared
to the prior year, our training and consulting service sales, which
typically have higher gross margins than the majority of our product
sales, increased as a percent of total sales when compared to fiscal
2006.
The shift toward increased training and consulting service sales
had a
favorable impact on our gross profit and gross margin during the
quarter
ended March 3, 2007.
|
·
|
Operating
Costs
-
Our
operating costs increased by $1.3
million compared to the prior year, which was the result of increased
selling, general, and administrative expenses totaling $1.2
million and a $0.1
million increase in depreciation expense. Amortization expense from
our
definite-lived intangible assets remained consistent with the prior
year.
|
·
|
Gain
on the Sale of Manufacturing Facility - During
the quarter ended March 3, 2007, we completed the sale of our printing
manufacturing facility and recognized a $1.2
million gain from the sale.
|
·
|
Income
Tax Provision
-
Our income tax provision for the quarter ended March 3, 2007 increased
to
$4.5
million compared to $1.9
million in the corresponding quarter of fiscal 2006. During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that it was appropriate to
reverse
substantially all of the valuation allowances on our deferred income
tax
assets. Prior to the reversal of these valuation allowances, our
income
tax provisions were affected by reductions in our deferred income
tax
valuation allowance as we utilized net operating loss carryforwards.
Our
effective tax rate for the two quarters ended March 3, 2007 of
approximately 50 percent was higher than statutory combined rates
primarily due to the accrual of taxable interest income on the management
stock loan program and withholding taxes on royalty income from foreign
licensees.
|
·
|
Redemption
of Preferred Stock -
Subsequent to March 3, 2007, we redeemed all remaining shares of
Series A
Preferred Stock, which totaled $37.3
million. Although we obtained a line of credit to finance a portion
of the
preferred stock redemption and will incur interest charges on amounts
borrowed, the redemption of the remaining preferred stock will reduce
our
required cash outflows for dividends by $3.7
million per year.
|
Further
details regarding these factors and their impact on our operating results and
liquidity are provided throughout the following management’s discussion and
analysis.
Quarter
Ended March 3, 2007 Compared to the Quarter Ended February 25,
2006
Sales
The
following table sets forth sales data by category and for our operating segments
(in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Two
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
Percent
Change
|
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
Percent
Change
|
||||||||||||||
Sales
by Category:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Products
|
$
|
45,283
|
$
|
50,841
|
(11)
|
|
$
|
87,391
|
$
|
94,244
|
(7)
|
|
|||||||
Training
and consulting services
|
31,593
|
27,492
|
15
|
65,014
|
56,440
|
15
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
76,876
|
$
|
78,333
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
152,405
|
$
|
150,684
|
1
|
|||||||||
Consumer
Solutions Business Unit:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Retail
Stores
|
$
|
19,265
|
$
|
23,781
|
(19)
|
|
$
|
33,392
|
$
|
38,424
|
(13)
|
|
|||||||
Consumer
Direct
|
17,062
|
19,613
|
(13)
|
|
36,998
|
38,789
|
(5)
|
|
|||||||||||
Wholesale
|
3,581
|
3,138
|
14
|
8,158
|
9,250
|
(12)
|
|
||||||||||||
CSBU
International
|
2,643
|
2,681
|
(1)
|
|
5,029
|
5,325
|
(6)
|
|
|||||||||||
Other
CSBU
|
1,583
|
1,291
|
23
|
2,877
|
2,454
|
17
|
|||||||||||||
44,134
|
50,504
|
(13)
|
|
86,454
|
94,242
|
(8)
|
|
||||||||||||
Organizational
Solutions Business Unit:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
19,313
|
15,347
|
26
|
37,034
|
31,677
|
17
|
|||||||||||||
International
|
13,429
|
12,482
|
8
|
28,917
|
24,765
|
17
|
|||||||||||||
32,742
|
27,829
|
18
|
65,951
|
56,442
|
17
|
||||||||||||||
Total
Sales
|
$
|
76,876
|
$
|
78,333
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
152,405
|
$
|
150,684
|
1
|
Product
Sales
- Overall
product sales, which primarily consists of planners, binders, totes, software
and related accessories that are primarily sold through our Consumer Solutions
Business Unit (CSBU) channels, declined $5.6
million,
or 11
percent,
compared to the prior year. In general, our product sales for the quarter ended
March 3, 2007 were adversely affected by our modified 52/53 week fiscal
calendar, which placed the seasonally busy sales week following the Thanksgiving
holiday into our first quarter of fiscal 2007 rather than in our second quarter
as was reported in fiscal 2006. The following is a description of sales
performance in our CSBU channels for the quarter ended March 3,
2007:
·
|
Retail
Stores
-
The decline in retail sales was primarily due to fewer stores, which
had a
$2.4
million impact on sales, reduced demand for technology and related
products, which declined $1.0
million, and decreased traffic in our retail locations. Reduced traffic
in
our stores contributed to decreased sales of “core” products (e.g.
planners, binders, forms, and totes) during the quarter. These factors
combined to produce a 10
percent decrease in comparable store (stores which were open during
the
comparable periods) sales compared to the prior year. When calculated
on
prior year comparable weeks, our comparable store sales declined
6
percent from fiscal 2006. At March 3, 2007, we were operating 87
retail stores compared to 97
stores at February 25, 2006. We closed two store locations during
the
quarter ended March 3, 2007, and based upon our continuing analyses
of
retail store performance, we may close additional retail store locations
and continue to recognize decreases in sales resulting from closed
stores
in future periods.
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct
-
Sales through our consumer direct channels (primarily catalog, eCommerce,
and public seminars) decreased $2.6
million, or 13
percent, primarily due to decreased traffic through our internet
and
catalog channels and decreased public seminar sales. Although traffic
through our eCommerce and catalog sites was unfavorably affected
by the
timing of certain shopping days during the quarter, overall traffic
in
these channels declined compared to the prior year. Public program
sales
decreased $0.5
million primarily due to a reduced number of seminars held during
the
quarter. In addition, sales through government depots decreased due
to a
decision by the government to discontinue sales of dated paper products
through these stores.
|
·
|
Wholesale
-
Sales through our wholesale channel, which includes sales to office
superstores and other retail chains, increased $0.4
million primarily due to the timing of product sales to these
entities.
|
·
|
CSBU
International -
This channel includes the product sales of our directly owned
international offices in Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and
Australia. Sales performance for the quarter through these channels
remained relatively
consistent
with the prior year. We separated the product sales operations from
the
Organizational Solutions Business Unit in these international locations
during the quarter ended December 2, 2006 to utilize existing product
sales and marketing expertise in an effort to improve overall product
sales performance at these offices.
|
·
|
Other
CSBU
-
Other CSBU sales consist primarily of domestic printing and publishing
sales and building sublease revenues. The increase in other CSBU
sales was
primarily due to increased external printing sales compared to the
prior
year.
|
Training
and Consulting Services
- We
offer
a variety of training courses, training related products, and consulting
services focused on productivity, leadership, strategy execution, sales force
performance, and effective communications training programs that are provided
both domestically and internationally through the Organizational Solutions
Business Unit (OSBU). Our overall training and consulting service sales
increased $4.1
million,
or 15
percent,
compared to fiscal 2006. Training and consulting service sales performance
during the quarter was influenced by the following factors in the OSBU
divisions:
·
|
Domestic - Our domestic training sales increased by $4.0 million, or 26 percent, primarily due to increased sales of our new leadership program based upon principles found in The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, increased training effectiveness sales, and increased strategy execution sales. Sales performance improved in nearly all of our domestic regions as our booked days delivered increased 19 percent and our customer facilitated training sales increased 18 percent over the prior year. Our current outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2007 continues to be strong and current training days booked have increased compared to the prior year. We believe that the introduction of new programs and refreshed existing programs will continue to have a favorable impact on training and consulting service sales in future periods. |
·
|
International
-
International sales increased $0.9
million, or 8
percent, compared to the prior year. Sales increased over the prior
year
at our directly owned foreign offices located in Brazil, Japan, Canada,
and Australia, as well as from licensee royalty revenues. Sales increases
in these offices were partially offset by decreased sales at our
offices
located in Mexico and the United Kingdom. The translation of foreign
sales
to United States dollars resulted in a $0.1
million favorable impact to our consolidated sales as certain foreign
currencies strengthened against the United States dollar during the
quarter ended March 3, 2007.
|
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit consists of net sales less the cost of goods sold or the cost of services
provided. Our consolidated gross profit totaled $47.2
million
for the quarter ended March 3, 2007 compared to $48.2
million
in fiscal 2006. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross profit stated
in
terms of a percentage of sales, was 61.4
percent
of sales compared to 61.5
percent
in fiscal 2006.
Our
gross
margin on product sales improved to 57.1
percent
compared to 56.2
percent
in fiscal 2006, primarily due to a favorable shift in our product mix as sales
of higher margin planners and binders increased as a percent of total product
sales, while sales of lower margin technology and specialty products
declined.
For
the
quarter ended March 3, 2007, our training and consulting services gross margin
was 67.6
percent
compared to 71.4
percent
in the prior year. The decline in training and consulting services gross margin
was primarily due to increased royalty costs associated with certain training
offerings, increased costs associated with the amortization of capitalized
curriculum, and increased public seminar costs. During fiscal 2007, training
and
consulting services sales increased to 41
percent
of total consolidated sales compared to 35
percent
of total consolidated sales in the prior year. The increase of higher margin
training and consulting offerings had a favorable impact on our consolidated
gross profit in the quarter ended March 3, 2007, which was offset by the
decrease in total product sales.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General and Administrative
- Our
selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $1.2
million,
or 3
percent,
compared to the prior year. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due
to 1) increased associate costs totaling $0.7
million
related to increased OSBU sales and additional sales personnel; 2) increased
legal fees resulting from a $0.3
million
recovery of legal fees in fiscal 2006 (refer to discussion below) and increased
costs for various matters that had a net impact on our operating expenses
totaling $0.7
million;
3) increased share-based compensation costs totaling $0.3
million
resulting primarily from the issuance of long-term incentive awards in the
first
quarter of fiscal 2007 and in the prior year; 4) increased consulting and
development costs totaling $0.3
million
that were incurred for various projects to improve sales and other operating
aspects of the Company; and 5) increased utility expense of $0.2
million
resulting primarily from a charge for contractual minimums from a communications
service provider. These increased operating costs were partially offset by
reduced associate expenses resulting from decreased bonuses and incentives
that
are tied to Company performance totaling
$0.4
million
and fewer retail stores, which had a $0.2
million
impact on our consolidated SG&A expenses.
At
present we are not satisfied with current levels of SG&A spending and are
pursuing numerous cost reduction strategies designed to control costs and bring
spending in line with desired business models. While we believe that these
efforts will be successful in reducing our operating expenses, the success
of
these initiatives is dependent upon numerous factors, many of which are not
within our control. Due to the time necessary to implement these cost reduction
strategies, we may not be able to implement these new initiatives quickly enough
to have a significant impact upon our fiscal 2007 operating
results.
Gain
on Sale of Manufacturing Facility
- In
August 2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations
to
improve our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve
our printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing
service sales. Our reconfiguration plan includes moving our printing operations
a short distance from its existing location to our corporate headquarters campus
and the sale of the manufacturing facility and certain printing presses. During
the quarter ended March 3, 2007, we completed the sale of the manufacturing
facility. The sale price was $2.5
million
and, after deducting customary closing costs, the net proceeds to the Company
from the sale totaled $2.3
million
in cash. The carrying value of the manufacturing facility at the date of sale
was approximately $1.1
million
and we recognized a $1.2
million
gain on the sale of the manufacturing facility during the quarter.
Depreciation
- Depreciation
expense increased $0.1
million,
or 12
percent,
compared to the same quarter of fiscal 2006 primarily due to an impairment
charge totaling $0.3
million
that we recorded to reduce the carrying value of one of our printing
presses to be sold to its anticipated sale price. This increase was
partially offset by the full depreciation or disposal of certain property
and
equipment (including retail stores) and the effects of significantly reduced
capital expenditures during prior fiscal years. Based upon capital spending
in
fiscal 2007 for new printing presses and other property and equipment items,
we
anticipate that total depreciation expense for fiscal 2007 will approximate
fiscal 2006 depreciation expense.
Legal
Settlement
In
fiscal
2002, we filed legal action against World Marketing Alliance, Inc., a Georgia
corporation (WMA), and World Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
and
purchaser of substantially all assets of WMA, for breach of contract. The case
proceeded to trial and the jury rendered a verdict in our favor and against
WMA
for the entire unpaid contract amount of approximately $1.1
million.
In addition to the verdict, we recovered legal fees totaling $0.3
million
and pre- and post-judgment interest of $0.3
million
from WMA. We received payment in cash from WMA for the total verdict amount,
including legal fees and interest. However, shortly after paying the verdict
amount, WMA appealed the jury decision to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals
and
we recorded receipt of the verdict amount plus legal fees and interest with
a
corresponding increase to accrued liabilities and deferred the gain until the
case was finally resolved. On December 30, 2005, we entered into a settlement
agreement with WMA. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, WMA agreed
to
dismiss its appeal. As a result of this settlement agreement and dismissal
of
WMA’s appeal, we recorded a $0.9
million
gain from the legal settlement during the quarter ended February 25,
2006.
Two
Quarters Ended March 3, 2007 Compared to the Two Quarters Ended February 25,
2006
Sales
Product
Sales
- Our
product sales, which are primarily sold through the Consumer Solutions Business
Unit (CSBU) channels, declined $6.9
million,
or 7
percent,
compared to the prior year. The following is a description of sales performance
in our CSBU channels for the two quarters ended March 3, 2007:
·
|
Retail
Stores - The decline in retail sales was primarily due to fewer
stores, which had a $4.0 million impact on sales, reduced demand
for
technology and related products, which declined $1.3 million, and
decreased traffic in our retail locations. Partially offsetting these
factors was increased sales of “core” products during the first two
quarters of fiscal 2007. These factors combined to produce a 3 percent
decrease in comparable store (stores which were open during the comparable
periods) sales, including the four additional business days in fiscal
2007, when compared to fiscal 2006.
|
·
|
Consumer
Direct - Sales through our consumer direct channels decreased
$1.8 million, or 5 percent, primarily due to decreased traffic through
our
internet and catalog channels in the fiscal quarter ended March 3,
2007.
Public seminar sales were flat compared to the prior year. In addition,
sales through government depots decreased due to a decision by the
government to discontinue sales of dated paper products through these
stores.
|
·
|
Wholesale
- Sales through our wholesale channel, which includes sales
to
office superstores and other retail chains, decreased $1.1 million
primarily due to reduced demand for our products from one of our
wholesale
customers.
|
·
|
CSBU
International - This channel includes the product sales of our
directly owned international offices in Canada, the United Kingdom,
Mexico, and Australia. Sales performance through these channels decreased
$0.3 million compared with the prior year due to reduced demand for
products in these countries.
|
·
|
Other
CSBU - The increase in other CSBU sales was primarily due to
increased external printing sales compared to the prior
year.
|
Training
and Consulting Services
- Our
consolidated training and consulting service sales increased $8.6
million,
or 15
percent,
compared to the prior year. Training and consulting service sales performance
during the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 was influenced by the following
trends in the OSBU divisions:
·
|
Domestic
- Our
domestic training sales increased by $5.4
million, or 17
percent, primarily due to increased sales of our new leadership program
based upon principles found in The
Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, increased
training effectiveness sales, and increased strategy execution sales.
Our
current outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2007 continues to be
strong
and current training days booked has increased compared to the prior
year.
|
·
|
International
-
International sales increased $4.2
million, or 17
percent, compared to the prior year. Sales increased over the prior
year
at all of our directly owned foreign offices except Mexico, as well
as
from licensee royalty revenues. The translation of foreign sales
to United
States dollars produced a $0.2
million favorable impact to our consolidated sales as certain foreign
currencies strengthened against the United States dollar during the
two
quarters ended March 3, 2007.
|
Gross
Profit
Due
to
increased training and consulting services sales in fiscal 2007, our
consolidated gross profit totaled $93.6
million
for the two quarters ended March 3, 2007 compared to $92.6
million
in the prior year. Our consolidated gross margin, which is gross profit stated
in terms of a percentage of sales, remained consistent with the prior year
at
61.4
percent
of consolidated sales.
Despite
declining product sales as discussed above, our gross margin on product sales
was 56.6
percent
compared to 56.5
percent
in fiscal 2006.
For
the
two quarters ended March 3, 2007, our training and consulting services gross
margin was 67.8
percent
compared to 69.6
percent
in the prior year. The slight decline in training and consulting services gross
margin was primarily due to increased costs associated with the amortization
of
capitalized curriculum, increased royalty costs associated with certain training
offerings, and increased public seminar costs. During the first two quarters
of
fiscal 2007, training and consulting services sales increased to 43
percent
of total consolidated sales compared to 38
percent
of total consolidated sales in the prior year.
Operating
Expenses
Selling,
General and Administrative
- Consolidated
SG&A expenses increased $4.3
million,
or 6
percent,
compared to the prior year. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due
to 1) the impact of additional business days on associate costs, 2) increased
audit and consulting costs resulting from compliance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX); 3) increased legal fees resulting from a
non-recurring benefit recorded in fiscal 2006 on the WMA legal settlement and
increased legal costs for ongoing litigation that had a net impact on our
operating expenses totaling $0.8
million;
4) increased promotional and advertising costs designed to increase product
sales, which totaled $0.5
million;
and 5) increased share-based compensation costs totaling $0.4
million
that resulted primarily from the issuance of long-term incentive awards. Due
to
the four additional business days included in fiscal 2007, we incurred an
additional $1.5
million
of associate costs, including payroll and related benefits. Accordingly, our
fourth fiscal quarter will have less business days and associated costs in
fiscal 2007 than in fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2006, we were required to comply
with Section 404 of SOX, which resulted in $1.0
million
of additional auditing and consulting fees. These increased operating costs
were
partially offset by reduced associate expenses resulting from decreased bonuses
and incentives that are tied to Company performance.
Gain
on Sale of Manufacturing Facility
- In
August
2006, we initiated a project to reconfigure our printing operations to improve
our printing services’ efficiency, reduce operating costs, and improve our
printing services’ flexibility in order to increase external printing service
sales. Our reconfiguration plan included the sale of our manufacturing facility
and certain printing presses. During the quarter ended March 3, 2007, we
completed the sale of the manufacturing facility and recorded a gain on the
sale
of $1.2
million.
For further information on the sale of the manufacturing facility, refer to
the
discussion regarding this transaction in the comparison of the quarter ended
March 3, 2007 to the quarter ended February 25, 2006.
Depreciation
and Amortization
- Depreciation
expense decreased $0.2
million,
or 9
percent,
compared to the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 primarily due to the full
depreciation or disposal of certain property and equipment (including retail
stores) and the effects of significantly reduced capital expenditures during
the
preceding fiscal years. These decreases were partially offset by an impairment
charge totaling $0.3
million
that we recorded during the quarter ended March 3, 2007 to reduce the carrying
value of one of our printing presses to be sold to its anticipated
sale price.
Amortization
expense from definite-lived intangible assets decreased to $1.8
million
compared to $2.0
million
in the prior year due to certain intangible assets becoming fully depreciated
during the first two quarters of fiscal 2006. We anticipate that intangible
asset amortization expense will total $3.6
million
in fiscal 2007.
Legal
Settlement
During
the quarter ended February 25, 2006, we entered into a legal settlement with
WMA. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, WMA agreed to dismiss its
appeal of a jury award that was rendered in our favor for breach of contract.
As
a result of this settlement agreement and dismissal of WMA’s appeal, we recorded
a $0.9
million
gain from the legal settlement. For more information regarding the legal
settlement, refer to the discussion under the quarter ended March 3, 2007
compared to the quarter ended February 25, 2006.
Income
Taxes
Our
income tax provision for the two quarters ended March 3, 2007 totaled
$6.2
million
compared to $2.5
million
in fiscal 2006. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we determined that
it
was appropriate to reverse substantially all of the valuation allowances on
our
deferred income tax assets. Prior to the reversal of these valuation allowances,
our income tax provisions were affected by reductions in our deferred income
tax
valuation allowance as we utilized net operating loss carryforwards. Our
effective tax rate for the two quarters ended March 3, 2007 of approximately
50
percent was higher than statutory combined rates primarily due to the accrual
of
taxable interest income on the management stock loan program and withholding
taxes on royalty income from foreign licensees.
Preferred
Stock Dividends
During
the first two quarters of fiscal 2006 we redeemed $20.0
million
of preferred stock, which reduced our preferred stock dividend obligation by
$0.7
million
in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to the same period of fiscal
2006.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Historically,
our primary sources of capital have been net cash provided by operating
activities, line-of-credit financing, long-term borrowings, asset sales, and
the
issuance of preferred and common stock. Through the quarter ended March 3,
2007,
we relied primarily upon cash flows from operating activities and cash on hand
to maintain adequate liquidity and working capital levels. Our second fiscal
quarter generally produces seasonally strong product sales and profitable
operations, which generates favorable cash flows from operating activities.
At
March 3, 2007, we had $28.6
million
of cash and cash equivalents compared to $30.6
million
at August 31, 2006. Our net working capital (current assets less current
liabilities) increased to $43.0
million
at March 3, 2007 compared to $38.7
million
at August 31, 2006.
Subsequent
to March 3, 2007, we used cash on hand and borrowings from a long-term line
of
credit (refer to Note 10
to the
condensed consolidated financial statements) to redeem all remaining outstanding
shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. The preferred shares were redeemed
at
their liquidation preference of $25 per share plus accrued dividends through
the
redemption date. Although the redemption of preferred stock will result in
additional interest expense from our line of credit borrowings, which will
be
influenced by amounts borrowed and prevailing interest rates, we expect that
our
annual interest expense on line of credit borrowings will be less than the
annual cash outflows required for preferred stock dividend
payments.
The
following discussion is a description of the primary factors affecting our
cash
flows and their effects upon our liquidity and capital resources during the
two
quarters ended March 3, 2007.
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
During
the two quarters ended March 3, 2007, our net cash provided by operating
activities totaled $8.8
million
compared to $11.2
million
for the same period of fiscal 2006. Our primary source of cash from operating
activities was the sale of goods and services to our customers in the normal
course of business and the primary uses of cash for operating activities were
payments to suppliers for materials used in products sold, payments for direct
costs necessary to conduct training programs, and payments for selling, general,
and administrative expenses. Cash used for changes in working capital during
the
first two quarters of fiscal 2007 was primarily related to 1) payments made
to
reduce accrued liabilities and accounts payable from seasonally high August
31
balances; 2) production of inventory items earlier than normal in anticipation
of possible printing services disruptions resulting from the reconfiguration
of
our printing services which is scheduled to be completed in our third fiscal
quarter of 2007; and 3) increased accounts
receivable balances resulting from improved OSBU sales. We believe that our
continued efforts to optimize working capital balances, combined with existing
and planned sales growth programs and cost-cutting initiatives, will improve
our
cash flows from operating activities in future periods. However, the success
of
these efforts, and their eventual contribution to our cash flows, is dependent
upon numerous factors, many of which are not within our control.
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities and Capital Expenditures
Net
cash
used for investing activities totaled $6.3
million
for the first two quarters of fiscal 2007. Our primary uses of cash for
investing activities included 1) purchases of property and equipment; and 2)
further investment in curriculum development. Purchases of property and
equipment, which totaled $5.4
million,
consisted primarily of payments for new printing presses and related printing
equipment resulting from the reconfiguration of our printing services,
additional computer software, and new computer hardware. During the first two
quarters of fiscal 2007, we spent $3.2
million
on further investment in curriculum development, primarily related to new online
learning modules and the development of new leadership curriculum based upon
principles found in The
7
Habits of Highly Effective People.
Partially offsetting these uses of cash for investing activities was the receipt
of $2.3
million
from the sale of our printing manufacturing facility.
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
Net
cash
used for financing activities during the two quarters ended March 3, 2007
totaled $4.6
million.
Our principal uses of cash for financing activities during this period were
purchases of our common stock for treasury totaling $2.5
million,
payment of preferred stock dividends totaling $1.9
million,
and principal payments totaling $0.3
million
on our long-term debt and financing obligation.
Contractual
Obligations
The
Company has not structured any special purpose or variable interest entities,
or
participated in any commodity trading activities, which would expose us to
potential undisclosed liabilities or create adverse consequences to our
liquidity. At March 3, 2007, we did not have any undisclosed material
commitments for capital expenditures that would further reduce our liquidity.
However, subsequent to the quarter ended March 3, 2007 we utilized cash on
hand
and borrowings from a new long-term line of credit to redeem all of our
remaining shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
The
following table has been revised to reflect the decrease in projected dividend
payments and monitoring fees paid to a preferred stock investor as a result
of
the redemption of Series A Preferred Stock subsequent to March 3, 2007. The
Company used cash on hand and borrowed $14.6
million
on its $25.0
million
line of credit to redeem the preferred stock, which is assumed to be paid at
the
end of the line of credit agreement in March 2010. Contractual obligations
in
other captions presented have not changed materially from those disclosed in
our
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006 and were not
revised (in thousands).
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
Fiscal
|
||||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Minimum
required payments to EDS for outsourcing services
|
$
|
17,217
|
$
|
15,901
|
$
|
15,927
|
$
|
15,577
|
$
|
15,298
|
$
|
73,233
|
$
|
153,153
|
||||||||
Required
payments on corporate campus financing obligation
|
3,045
|
3,045
|
3,045
|
3,055
|
3,115
|
49,957
|
65,262
|
|||||||||||||||
Minimum
operating lease payments
|
8,475
|
7,228
|
5,564
|
4,012
|
2,402
|
6,013
|
33,694
|
|||||||||||||||
Line
of credit payments(5)
|
391
|
937
|
937
|
15,112
|
-
|
-
|
17,377
|
|||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend payments(1)
|
2,215
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,215
|
|||||||||||||||
Other
debt payments(2)
|
176
|
168
|
160
|
153
|
145
|
435
|
1,237
|
|||||||||||||||
Contractual
computer hardware purchases(3)
|
535
|
483
|
556
|
587
|
525
|
3,192
|
5,878
|
|||||||||||||||
Payments
for new printing services equipment(4)
|
3,137
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,137
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
10,523
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,523
|
|||||||||||||||
Monitoring
fees paid to a preferred stock investor(1)
|
97
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
97
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
expected contractual obligation
payments
|
$
|
45,811
|
$
|
27,762
|
$
|
26,189
|
$
|
38,496
|
$
|
21,485
|
$
|
132,830
|
$
|
292,573
|
(1) |
Amount
reflects the redemption of all remaining Series A Preferred Stock
subsequent to March 3, 2007.
|
(2) |
The
Company’s variable rate debt payments include interest payments at
7.0
percent,
which was the applicable interest rate at September 29,
2006.
|
(3) |
We
are contractually obligated by our EDS outsourcing agreement to purchase
the necessary computer hardware to keep such equipment up to current
specifications. Amounts shown are estimated capital purchases of
computer
hardware under terms of the EDS outsourcing agreement and its
amendments.
|
(4) |
In
August 2006, we signed contracts to purchase new printing equipment
for
$3.1
million in cash as part of a plan to reconfigure our printing services
operation. The payments are due at specified times during fiscal
2007 that
coincide with the installation and successful operation of the new
equipment.
|
(5) |
Interest
expense on the line of credit payments was calculated at 6.4
percent,
which was the approximate interest rate on the date of the preferred
stock
redemption, and assumes that only interest payments will be made
until the
line of credit agreement expires in March
2010.
|
Other
Items
Management
Common Stock Loan Program
- The
Company is the creditor for a loan program that provided the capital to allow
certain management personnel the opportunity to purchase shares of our common
stock. For further information regarding our management common stock loan
program, refer to Note 9
in
our
consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August
31, 2006. The inability of the Company to collect all, or a portion, of these
receivables could have an adverse impact upon our financial position and future
cash flows compared to full collection of the loans.
Availability
of Future Capital Resources
- Going
forward, we will continue to incur costs necessary for the operation of the
business. We anticipate using cash on hand, cash provided by operating
activities, on the condition that we can continue generating positive cash
flows
from operations, and other financing alternatives, as necessary, for these
expenditures. We anticipate that our existing capital resources should be
adequate to enable us to maintain our operations for at least the upcoming
twelve months. However, our ability to maintain adequate capital for our
operations in the future is dependent upon a number of factors, including sales
trends, our ability to contain costs, levels of capital expenditures, collection
of accounts receivable, and other factors. Some of the factors that influence
our operations are not within our control, such as economic conditions and
the
introduction of new technology and products by our competitors. We will continue
to monitor our liquidity position and may pursue additional financing
alternatives to maintain sufficient resources for future operating and capital
requirements. However, there can be no assurance such financing alternatives
will be available to us on acceptable terms.
USE
OF ESTIMATES AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The significant
accounting polices that we used to prepare our consolidated financial statements
are outlined in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, which are
presented in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2006. Some of those accounting policies require us to
make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements. Management regularly evaluates its estimates and
assumptions and bases those estimates and assumptions on historical experience,
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and
requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions, including changes in economic conditions and other
circumstances that are not in our control, but which may have an impact on
these
estimates and our actual financial results.
The
following items require significant judgment and often involve complex
estimates:
Revenue
Recognition
We
derive
revenues primarily from the following sources:
·
|
Products
-
We sell planners, binders, planner accessories, totes, handheld electronic
devices, and other related products that are primarily sold through
our
CSBU channels.
|
·
|
Training
and Consulting Services
-
We provide training and consulting services to both organizations
and
individuals in strategic execution, leadership, productivity, goal
alignment, sales force performance, and communication effectiveness
skills. These training programs and services are primarily sold through
our OSBU channels.
|
The
Company recognizes revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, 2) delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered,
3)
the price to the customer is fixed and determinable, and 4) collectibility
is
reasonably assured. For product sales, these conditions are generally met upon
shipment of the product to the customer or by completion of the sale transaction
in a retail store. For training and service sales, these conditions are
generally met upon presentation of the training seminar or delivery of the
consulting services.
Some
of
our training and consulting contracts contain multiple deliverable elements
that
include training along with other products and services. In accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Accounting
for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,
sales
arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of
accounting if the deliverables in the sales contract meet the following
criteria: 1) the delivered training or product has value to the client on a
standalone basis; 2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value
of undelivered items; and 3) delivery of any undelivered item is probable.
The
overall contract consideration is allocated among the separate units of
accounting based upon their fair values, with the amount allocated to the
delivered item being limited to the amount that is not contingent upon the
delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions.
If the fair value of all undelivered elements exits, but fair value does not
exist for one or more delivered elements, the residual method is used. Under
the
residual method, the amount of consideration allocated to the delivered items
equals the total contract consideration less the aggregate fair value of the
undelivered items. Fair value of the undelivered items is based upon the normal
pricing practices for the Company’s existing training programs, consulting
services, and other products, which are generally the prices of the items when
sold separately.
Revenue
is recognized on software sales in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP)
97-2, Software
Revenue Recognition as
amended by SOP 98-09. SOP 97-2, as amended, generally requires revenue earned
on
software arrangements involving multiple elements such as software products
and
support to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair value of
the
elements based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE). The majority of
the
Company’s software sales have elements, including a license and post contract
customer support (PCS). Currently the Company does not have VSOE for either
the
license or support elements of its software sales. Accordingly, revenue is
deferred until the only undelivered element is PCS and the total arrangement
fee
is recognized ratably over the support period.
Our
international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where we
do
not have a directly-owned operation. Licensee companies are unrelated entities
that have been granted a license to translate the Company’s content and
curriculum, adapt the content and curriculum to the local culture, and sell
the
Company’s training seminars and products in a specific country or region.
Licensees are required to pay us royalties based upon a percentage of the
licensee’s sales. We recognize royalty income each period based upon the sales
information reported to us by the licensee.
Revenue
is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts
for discounts and product returns.
Share-Based
Compensation
During
fiscal 2006, we granted performance based compensation awards to certain
employees in a Board of Director approved long-term incentive plan (the LTIP).
These performance-based share awards allow each participant the right to receive
a certain number of shares of common stock based upon the achievement of
specified financial goals at the end of a predetermined performance period.
The
LTIP awards vest on August 31 of the third fiscal year from the grant date,
which corresponds to the completion of a three-year performance cycle. For
example, the LTIP awards granted in fiscal 2006 vest on August 31, 2008. The
number of shares that are finally awarded to LTIP participants is variable
and
is based entirely upon the achievement of a combination of performance
objectives related to sales growth and cumulative operating income during the
performance period. Due to the variable number of shares that may be issued
under the LTIP, we reevaluate the LTIP grants on a quarterly basis and adjust
the number of shares expected to be awarded for each grant based upon financial
results of the Company as compared to the performance goals set for the award.
Adjustments to the number of shares awarded, and to the corresponding
compensation expense, are based upon estimated future performance and are made
on a cumulative basis at the date of adjustment based upon the probable number
of shares to be awarded.
The
Compensation Committee initially granted awards for 378,665 shares (the Target
Award) of common stock under the LTIP during fiscal 2006. However, the actual
number of shares finally awarded will range from zero shares, if a minimum
level
of performance is not achieved, to 200 percent of the target award, if
specifically defined performance criteria is achieved during the three-year
performance period. The minimum sales growth necessary for participants to
receive any shares under the fiscal 2006 LTIP is 7.5 percent and the minimum
cumulative operating income is $36.2 million. The number of shares finally
awarded to LTIP participants under the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant is based upon
the
combination of factors as shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
30.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
22.5%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
15.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
11.8
%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
7.5%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$36.20
|
$56.80
|
$72.30
|
$108.50
|
$144.60
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
Based
upon actual financial performance through March 3, 2007 and estimated
performance through the remaining service period of the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant
(fiscal 2007 and 2008), the number of performance awards granted during fiscal
2006 was increased to 221,195 shares, which resulted in a cumulative adjustment
to increase our operating expenses by $0.1 million in the quarter ended March
3,
2007. At March 3, 2007, there was a total of $0.9
million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to our fiscal 2006 LTIP grant. The
total compensation cost of the fiscal 2006 LTIP will be equal to the number
of
shares finally issued multiplied by $6.60 per share, which was the fair value
of
the common shares determined at the grant date.
During
fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee granted performance awards for 429,312
shares of common stock under terms of the LTIP. The fiscal 2007 LTIP award
was
valued at $5.78 per share, which was the closing price of our common stock
on
the grant date. Consistent with the fiscal 2006 LTIP grant, the Company must
achieve minimum levels of sales growth and cumulative operating income in order
for participants to receive any shares under the LTIP grant. The minimum sales
growth for the fiscal 2007 LTIP is 10.0 percent (fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2006) and the minimum cumulative operating income total is $41.3 million. We
will record compensation expense using a 5 percent estimated forfeiture rate
during the vesting period. However, the total amount of compensation expense
recorded for the fiscal 2007 LTIP will equal the number of shares awarded
multiplied by $5.78 per share. At March 3, 2007 there was $2.2
million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to the fiscal 2007 LTIP grant. The
number of shares finally awarded to LTIP participants under the fiscal 2007
LTIP
grant is based upon the combination of factors as shown below:
Sales
Growth
|
Percent
of Target Shares Awarded
|
||||
40.0%
|
115%
|
135%
|
150%
|
175%
|
200%
|
30.0%
|
90%
|
110%
|
125%
|
150%
|
175%
|
20.0%
|
65%
|
85%
|
100%
|
125%
|
150%
|
15.7%
|
50%
|
70%
|
85%
|
110%
|
135%
|
10.0%
|
30%
|
50%
|
65%
|
90%
|
115%
|
$41.30
|
$64.90
|
$82.60
|
$123.90
|
$165.20
|
|
Cumulative
Operating Income (millions)
|
The
evaluation of LTIP performance awards and corresponding use of estimated amounts
may produce additional volatility in our consolidated financial statements
as we
record cumulative adjustments to the estimated number of common shares to be
awarded under the LTIP grants. Actual results could differ from estimates made
during the service, or vesting, period.
We
estimate the value of our stock option awards on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. However, the Company did not grant any
stock
options in the first two quarters of fiscal 2007 or in fiscal years 2006 and
2005 and the remaining cost associated with our unvested stock options at March
3, 2007 was insignificant.
Accounts
Receivable Valuation
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate
of
the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts
receivable balance. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based
upon
historical write-off experience and current economic conditions and we review
the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis.
Receivable balances past due over 90 days, which exceed a specified dollar
amount, are reviewed individually for collectibility. Account balances are
charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been
exhausted and the probability for recovery is considered remote. We do not
have
any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. Our inventories are comprised primarily of dated
calendar products and other non-dated products such as binders, handheld
electronic devices, stationery, training products, and other accessories.
Provision is made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated
net realizable value. In assessing the realization of inventories, we make
judgments regarding future demand requirements and compare these assessments
with current and committed inventory levels. Inventory requirements may change
based on projected customer demand, technological and product life cycle
changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors that
could affect the valuation of our inventories.
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized, but rather
are tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if events or
circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The Covey trade
name
intangible asset has been deemed to have an indefinite life. This intangible
asset is assigned to the OSBU and is tested for impairment using the present
value of estimated royalties on trade name related revenues, which consist
primarily of training seminars, international licensee royalties, and related
products. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of
our
indefinite-lived intangible asset change in the future, significant impairment
charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations
and
financial condition. Based upon our fiscal 2006 evaluation, our trade-name
related revenues and licensee royalties would have to suffer significant
reductions before we would be required to impair the Covey trade
name.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived
tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We use an estimate of
undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over the remaining useful
lives
in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is recoverable. If
the
carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows of the
assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the
carrying values of the assets and their estimated fair values. Impairment of
long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there are
identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets. The
evaluation of long-lived assets requires us to use estimates of future cash
flows. If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our
long-lived tangible and definite-lived intangible assets change in the future,
significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
Income
Taxes
The
Company regularly evaluates United States federal and various state and foreign
jurisdiction income tax exposures. The tax benefits of tax exposure items are
not recognized in the provision for income taxes unless it is probable that
the
benefits will be sustained, without regard to the likelihood of tax examination.
A tax exposure reserve represents the difference between the recognition of
benefits related to exposure items for income tax reporting purposes and
financial reporting purposes. The tax exposure reserve is classified as a
component of the current income taxes payable account. The Company adds interest
and penalties, if applicable, each period to the reserve.
The
Company recognizes the benefits of the tax exposure items in the financial
statements, that is, the reserve is reversed, when it becomes probable that
the
tax position will be sustained. To assess the probability of sustaining a tax
position, the Company considers all available positive evidence. In many
instances, sufficient positive evidence will not be available until the
expiration of the statute of limitations for Internal Revenue Service audits,
at
which time the entire benefit will be recognized as a discrete item in the
applicable period.
The
calculation of our income tax provision or benefit, as applicable, requires
estimates of future taxable income or losses. During the course of the fiscal
year, these estimates are compared to actual financial results and adjustments
may be made to our tax provision or benefit to reflect these revised
estimates.
The
Company continually assesses the need for valuation allowances against its
deferred income tax assets, considering recent profitability, known trends
and
events, and expected future transactions. For several years prior to the year
ended August 31, 2006, our history of significant operating losses precluded
us
from demonstrating that it was more likely than not that the related benefits
from deferred income tax deductions and foreign tax carryforwards would be
realized. Accordingly, we recorded valuation allowances on the majority of
our
deferred income tax assets.
In
fiscal
2006 we reversed the majority of these valuation allowances. Due to improved
operating performance, business models, and expectations regarding future
taxable income, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that
the benefits of domestic operating loss carryforwards, together with the
benefits of other deferred income tax assets will be realized. Thus, we reversed
the valuation allowances on certain of our domestic deferred income tax assets,
except for $2.2 million related to foreign tax credits.
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Sales
Tax Presentation
- In
June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-03, How
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should
Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net
Presentation).
This
consensus provides that the presentation of taxes assessed by a governmental
authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between
a
seller and a customer on either a gross basis (included in revenues and costs)
or on a net basis (excluded from revenues) is an accounting policy decision
that
should be disclosed. The provisions of EITF 06-03 become effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company
currently presents taxes resulting from revenue based transaction on a net
basis
and has determined to keep that policy in place. As a result of this policy,
the
Company does not believe that the adoption of EITF 06-03 will have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statement presentation. As required by
EITF
06-03, we will formally adopt the provisions of EITF 06-03 in our fiscal quarter
ending June 2, 2007.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
- In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109.
This
interpretation prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement
standard, as well as criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing,
and
measuring tax positions for financial statement purposes. This interpretation
also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainties as they
relate to income tax accounting and is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect from the adoption of FIN No.
48,
if any, will be an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the year of
adoption. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN No. 48 on September
1,
2007 (fiscal 2008) and we are currently in the process of evaluating the impact
of FIN No. 48 on our financial statements.
Evaluation
of Misstatements
- In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements,
which
provides the Staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial
statement misstatements, such as assessing both the carryover and reversing
effects of prior year misstatements on the current year financial statements.
The Company will adopt the misstatement evaluation requirements of SAB No.
108
for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.
Fair
Value Measures
- In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measures.
This
statement establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets
out
a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about
fair-value measurements. Statement No. 157 only applies to fair-value
measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting
standards except for measurements of share-based payments and measurements
that
are similar to, but not intended to be, fair value. This statement is effective
for the specified fair value measures for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and will thus be effective for the
Company in fiscal 2008. We have not yet completed our analysis of the impact
of
SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements.
SAFE
HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF
1995
Certain
written and oral statements made by the Company or our representatives in this
report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
press releases, conferences, internet webcasts, or otherwise, are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement
that
may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or
achievements, and may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,”
“estimate,” “project,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. In our reports
and filings we may make forward looking statements regarding future product
and
training sales activity, anticipated expenses, projected cost reduction and
strategic initiatives, expected levels of depreciation expense, expectations
regarding tangible and intangible asset valuation expenses, expected
improvements in cash flows from operating activities, the adequacy of our
existing capital resources, estimated capital expenditures, and cash flow
estimates used to determine the fair value of long-lived assets. These, and
other forward-looking statements, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties
that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to time in
reports filed by us with the SEC, including reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and
10-K. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the matters
discussed in Item 1A of our report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August
31, 2006, entitled “Risk Factors.” In addition, such risks and uncertainties may
include unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas:
unanticipated costs or capital expenditures; difficulties encountered by EDS
in
operating and maintaining our information systems and controls, including
without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning, inventory
control, and order fulfillment; delays or unanticipated outcomes relating to
our
strategic plans; dependence on existing products or services; the rate and
consumer acceptance of new product introductions; competition; the number and
nature of customers and their product orders, including changes in the timing
or
mix of product or training orders; pricing of our products and services and
those of competitors; adverse publicity; and other factors which may adversely
affect our business.
The
risks
included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include
additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial
performance, including the risk factors noted in Item 1A of our August 31,
2006
report on Form 10-K. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly
changing environment. New risk factors may emerge and it is not possible for
our
management to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of
all
such risk factors on our business or the extent
to
which any single factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results
to
differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements. Given
these risks and uncertainties, investors should not rely on forward-looking
statements as a prediction of actual results.
The
market price of our common stock has been and may remain volatile. In addition,
the stock markets in general have experienced increased volatility. Factors
such
as quarter-to-quarter variations in revenues and earnings or losses and our
failure to meet expectations could have a significant impact on the market
price
of our common stock. In addition, the price of our common stock can change
for
reasons unrelated to our performance. Due to our low market capitalization,
the
price of our common stock may also be affected by conditions such as a lack
of
analyst coverage and fewer potential investors.
Forward-looking
statements are based on management’s expectations as of the date made, and the
Company does not undertake any responsibility to update any of these statements
in the future except as required by law. Actual future performance and results
will differ and may differ materially from that contained in or suggested by
forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC.
ITEM
3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market
Risk of Financial Instruments
The
Company is exposed to financial instrument market risk primarily through
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage
risks associated with foreign currency exchange and interest rates, we make
limited use of derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are financial
instruments that derive their value from one or more underlying financial
instruments. As a matter of policy, our derivative instruments are entered
into
for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not
constitute positions that are independent of those exposures. In addition,
we do
not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes, nor
are
we party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The notional amounts of
derivatives do not represent actual amounts exchanged by the parties to the
instrument, and, thus, are not a measure of exposure to us through our use
of
derivatives. Additionally, we enter into derivative agreements only with highly
rated counterparties and we do not expect to incur any losses resulting from
non-performance by other parties.
Foreign
Currency Sensitivity
Due
to
the global nature of our operations, we are subject to risks associated with
transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the United States
dollar, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in foreign
currencies to United States dollars as a normal part of the reporting process.
The objective of our foreign currency risk management activities is to reduce
foreign currency risk in the consolidated financial statements. In order to
manage foreign currency risks, we make limited use of foreign currency forward
contracts and other foreign currency related derivative instruments. Although
we
cannot eliminate all aspects of our foreign currency risk, we believe that
our
strategy, which includes the use of derivative instruments, can reduce the
impacts of foreign currency related issues on our consolidated financial
statements. The following is a description of our use of foreign currency
derivative instruments.
During
the quarter and two quarters ended March 3, 2007 we utilized foreign currency
forward contracts to manage the volatility of certain intercompany financing
transactions and other transactions that are denominated in foreign currencies.
Because these contracts do not meet specific hedge accounting requirements,
gains and losses on these contracts, which expire on a quarterly basis, are
recognized currently and are used to offset a portion of the gains or losses
of
the related accounts. The gains and losses
on
these contracts were recorded as a component of SG&A expense in our
consolidated income statements and had the following impact on the periods
indicated (in thousands):
Quarter
Ended
|
Two
Quarters Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
March
3,
2007
|
February
25,
2006
|
||||||||||
Losses
on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
Gains
on foreign exchange contracts
|
15
|
5
|
33
|
222
|
|||||||||
Net
gain (loss) on foreign exchange contracts
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
$
|
154
|
At
March
3, 2007, the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts, which was
determined using the estimated amount at which contracts could be settled based
upon forward market exchange rates, was insignificant. The notional amounts
of
our foreign currency sell contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting
were as follows at March 3, 2007 (in thousands):
Contract
Description
|
Notional
Amount in Foreign Currency
|
Notional
Amount in U.S. Dollars
|
|||||
Mexican
Pesos
|
13,576
|
$
|
1,199
|
||||
Australian
Dollars
|
1,000
|
788
|
|||||
Japanese
Yen
|
88,404
|
770
|
During
the quarter and two quarters ended March 3, 2007, we did not utilize any
derivative contracts that qualified for hedge accounting. However, the Company
may utilize net investment hedge contracts or other foreign currency derivatives
in future periods as a component of our overall foreign currency risk
strategy.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The
Company is exposed to fluctuations in U.S. interest rates primarily as a result
of the cash and cash equivalents that we hold and new line of credit agreements.
At March 3, 2007, our debt balances consisted primarily of a financing
obligation associated with the sale of our corporate headquarters facility
and a
long-term mortgage on certain of our buildings and property. Subsequent to
March
3, 2007, we used cash on hand and obtained a long-term line of credit to redeem
all of our remaining preferred stock. Our new line of credit is a variable
interest facility that will increase our sensitivity to interest rate
fluctuations in future periods. Our overall interest rate sensitivity will
be
influenced by the amounts borrowed on the line of credit and the prevailing
interest rates which may create additional liability as a result of increased
interest rates in future periods. During the quarter and two quarters ended
we
were not party to any interest rate swap or other interest related derivative
instruments that would increase our interest rate sensitivity.
ITEM
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that
any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance
of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to
apply
its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures.
We
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered
by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During
the quarter ended March 3, 2007, we implemented the following new controls
and
procedures related to the accrual of liabilities for services:
·
|
In
general, the Company has established and communicated to vendors,
service
providers, and associates, new policies instructing that all vendor
invoices be sent directly to the Company’s accounts payable
department.
|
·
|
Upon
receipt of a vendor invoice, the accounts payable department records
the
vendor invoice into the accounts payable sub-ledger before the invoice
is
sent to the appropriate department for review and
approval.
|
·
|
At
each period end, all unapproved invoices in the accounts payable
sub-ledger are reviewed and investigated to determine whether an
accrual
is necessary for services provided during the
period.
|
Other
than described above, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)) during the
most
recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
PART
II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1A. RISK
FACTORS
For
information regarding Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1A in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31,
2006.
Item
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The
Company acquired the following shares of its outstanding securities during
the
fiscal quarter ended March 3, 2007:
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans
or
Programs
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||
Common
Shares:
|
|||||||||||||
December
3, 2006 to January 6, 2007
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
none
|
$
|
4,887
|
|||||||
January
7, 2007 to February 3, 2007
|
6,814(2
|
)
|
7.14
|
none
|
4,887
|
||||||||
February
4, 2007 to March 3, 2007
|
328,000(1
|
)
|
7.54
|
328,000
|
2,413(1
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
Common Shares
|
334,814
|
$
|
7.53
|
328,000
|
|||||||||
Total
Preferred Shares
|
none
|
none
|
(1) |
In
January 2006, our Board of Directors approved the purchase of up
to
$10.0
million of our outstanding common stock. All previous authorized
common
stock purchase plans were canceled. Following the approval of this
common
stock purchase plan, we have purchased a total of 1,009,300
shares of our common stock for $7.6
million through March 3, 2007.
|
(2) |
Amount
represents shares withheld for statutory taxes from a distribution
of
common shares in connection with the vesting of an unvested stock
award.
|
Item
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
We
held
our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Friday, January 19, 2007. The following
represents a summary of each matter voted upon and the corresponding voting
results for each item considered by shareholders at the Annual
Meeting.
Further
information regarding each item can be found in the Company’s definitive Proxy
Statement which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 15, 2006.
1.
|
Election
of Directors - Three
directors were elected for three-year terms that expire at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held following the end of fiscal 2009,
or
until their successors are elected and qualified. The number of votes
for
each nominee for director was as
follows:
|
Name
|
Votes
For
|
Votes
Withheld
|
||
Joel
C. Peterson
|
18,038,977
|
1,063,242
|
||
E.
Kay Stepp
|
18,005,232
|
1,096,987
|
||
Robert
A. Whitman
|
17,999,458
|
1,102,761
|
2.
|
Appointment
of Independent Auditors - The
shareholders ratified the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2007.
A total
of 18,370,014 shares voted in favor of this appointment, 730,587
shares
voted against, and 1,619 shares abstained from
voting.
|
Item
6. EXHIBITS
(A)
|
Exhibits:
|
|
10.1
|
Revolving
Line of Credit Agreement ($18,000,000) by and between JPMorgan Chase
Bank,
N.A. and Franklin Covey Co. dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit
10.1
to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.2
|
Secured
Promissory Note between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Franklin Covey
Co.
dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.2 to Current Report
on Form
8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
19, 2007
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.3
|
Security
Agreement between Franklin Covey Co., Franklin Covey Printing, Inc.,
Franklin Development Corporation, Franklin Covey Travel, Inc., Franklin
Covey Catalog Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Franklin
Covey Product Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Services LLC, Franklin
Covey
Marketing, LTD., and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Zions First National
Bank, dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.3 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 19,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.4
|
Repayment
Guaranty between Franklin Covey Co., Franklin Covey Printing, Inc.,
Franklin Development Corporation, Franklin Covey Travel, Inc., Franklin
Covey Catalog Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Franklin
Covey Product Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Services LLC, Franklin
Covey
Marketing, LTD., and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., dated March 14, 2007
(attached as exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed
with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.5
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement between Franklin Covey Co. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank,
N.A. and Zions First National Bank, dated March 14, 2007 (attached
as
exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein
by
reference).
|
|
10.6
|
Revolving
Line of Credit Agreement ($7,000,000) by and between Zions First
National
Bank and Franklin Covey Co. dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit
10.6
to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.7
|
Secured
Promissory Note between Zions First National Bank and Franklin Covey
Co.
dated March 14, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.7 to Current Report
on Form
8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
19, 2007
and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
||
10.8
|
Repayment
Guaranty between Franklin Covey Co., Franklin Covey Printing, Inc.,
Franklin Development Corporation, Franklin Covey Travel, Inc., Franklin
Covey Catalog Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc., Franklin
Covey Product Sales, Inc., Franklin Covey Services LLC, Franklin
Covey
Marketing, LTD., and Zions First National Bank, dated March 14, 2007
(attached as exhibit 10.8 to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed
with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.9
|
Credit
Agreement between Franklin Covey Canada, Ltd. and Toronto-Dominion
Bank
dated February 19, 2007 (attached as exhibit 10.9 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 19,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
FRANKLIN COVEY CO. | ||||
Date:
|
April
12, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
ROBERT A. WHITMAN
|
|
Robert
A. Whitman
|
||||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||||
Date:
|
April
12, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
STEPHEN D. YOUNG
|
|
Stephen
D. Young
|
||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
||||