FreightCar America, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2015

or

Commission file number: 000-51237

FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(800) 458-2235

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

As of November 3, 2015, there were 12,328,014 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FreightCar America, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

3

Table of Contents

FreightCar America, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

4

Table of Contents

FreightCar America, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

5

Table of Contents

FreightCar America, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except for share data)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

6

Table of Contents

FreightCar America, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

7

Table of Contents

FreightCar America, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

Note 1 – Description of the Business

FreightCar America, Inc. (“FreightCar”) operates primarily in North America through its direct and indirect subsidiaries, JAC Operations, Inc., Johnstown America, LLC, Freight Car Services, Inc., JAIX Leasing Company (“JAIX”), FreightCar Roanoke, LLC, FreightCar Mauritius Ltd. (“Mauritius”), FreightCar Rail Services, LLC (“FCRS”), FreightCar Short Line, Inc. (“FCSL”), FreightCar Alabama, LLC and FreightCar (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. (herein collectively referred to as the “Company”), and manufactures a wide range of railroad freight cars, supplies railcar parts and leases freight cars. The Company designs and builds high-quality railcars, including coal cars, bulk commodity cars, covered hopper cars, intermodal and non-intermodal flat cars, mill gondola cars, coil steel cars and boxcars. The Company is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and has facilities in the following locations: Cherokee, Alabama; Danville, Illinois; Grand Island, Nebraska; Johnstown, Pennsylvania; Roanoke, Virginia; and Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.

The Company’s operations comprise two reportable segments, Manufacturing and Services. The Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are all Delaware corporations or Delaware limited liability companies except Mauritius, which is incorporated in Mauritius, and FreightCar (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd., which is organized in the People’s Republic of China. The Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries are all wholly owned.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FreightCar America, Inc. and subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The foregoing financial information has been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial reporting. The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying interim financial information is unaudited; however, the Company believes the financial information reflects all adjustments (consisting of items of a normal recurring nature) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. The 2014 year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements as of December 31, 2014. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Note 3 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330), which requires entities to measure most inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Under ASU 2015-11, inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which eliminates the need to determine replacement cost and evaluate whether it is above the ceiling (net realizable value) or below the floor (net realizable value less normal profit margin). ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This standard is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (early adoption is permitted). The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. This standard is effective retrospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (early adoption is permitted). The adoption of these changes is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

8

Table of Contents

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. The new guidance affects the following areas: (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest; (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination; (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination; and (5) certain investment funds. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition. ASU 2014-09 provides for a single five-step model to be applied to all revenue contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional financial statement disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis whereby the new standard would be applied to new contracts and existing contracts with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date, with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings at the effective date for existing contracts with remaining performance obligations. On July 9, 2015 the FASB voted to approve a one year delay of the effective date to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and to permit companies to voluntarily adopt the new standard as of the original effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect that the standard is expected to have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows and related disclosures.

Note 4 – Segment Information

The Company’s operations comprise two reportable segments, Manufacturing and Services. The Company’s Manufacturing segment includes new railcar manufacturing, used railcar sales, railcar leasing and major railcar rebuilds. Through September 30, 2015, the Company’s Services segment included general railcar repair and maintenance, inspections and parts sales. Corporate includes selling, general and administrative expenses not related to production of goods and services, retiree pension and other postretirement benefit costs, and all other non-operating activity.

Segment operating income is an internal performance measure used by the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker to assess the performance of each segment in a given period. Segment operating income includes all external revenues attributable to the segments as well as operating costs and income that management believes are directly attributable to the current production of goods and services. The Company’s management reporting package does not include interest revenue, interest expense or income taxes allocated to individual segments and these items are not considered as a component of segment operating income. Segment assets represent operating assets and exclude intersegment accounts, deferred tax assets and income tax receivables. The Company does not allocate cash and cash equivalents to its operating segments as the Company’s treasury function is managed at the corporate level. Intersegment revenues were not material in any period presented.

9

Table of Contents

10

Table of Contents

Note 5 – Fair Value Measurements

The following table sets forth by level within the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets that were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

No non-financial assets were recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis at each of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Note 6 – Marketable Securities

The Company’s current investment policy is to invest in cash, certificates of deposit, U.S. treasury securities, U.S. government agency obligations and money market funds invested in U.S. government securities. Marketable securities as of September 30, 2015 of $30,009 consisted of U.S. treasury securities held to maturity and certificates of deposit with original maturities of greater than 90 days and up to one year. Marketable securities as of December 31, 2014 of $47,961 consisted of U.S. treasury securities held to maturity with original maturities of greater than 90 days and up to one year. Due to the short-term nature of these securities and their low interest rates, there is no material difference between their fair market values and amortized costs.

Note 7 – Inventories

Inventories, net of reserve for excess and obsolete items, consist of the following:

Inventory on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets includes reserves of $3,916 and $2,381 relating to excess and obsolete inventory for parts and work in progress at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Amounts in the table above as of September 30, 2015 reflect reductions of $2,537 in parts and service inventory and total inventories related to the Company’s sale of its railcar repair and maintenance services business on September 30, 2015 (see Note 21).

Note 8 – Leased Railcars

Inventory on lease was $0 and $116 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Railcars available for lease, net at September 30, 2015 was $16,126 (cost of $19,230 and accumulated depreciation of $3,104) and at December 31, 2014 was $22,897 (cost of $26,852 and accumulated depreciation of $3,955). The Company’s lease utilization rate for railcars in its lease fleet was 65% and 100% at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Leased railcars at September 30, 2015 are subject to lease agreements with external customers with terms of up to six years and are accounted for as operating leases.

Future minimum rental revenues on leased railcars at September 30, 2015 are as follows:

11

Table of Contents

Note 9 – Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

Amounts in the table above as of September 30, 2015 reflect reductions of $7,740 in total property, plant and equipment, net, related to the Company’s sale of its railcar repair and maintenance services business on September 30, 2015 (see Note 21).

Note 10 – Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible assets consist of the following:

Patents are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their remaining legal life from the date of acquisition. The weighted average remaining life of the Company’s patents is approximately two years. Amortization expense related to patents, which is included in cost of sales, was $148 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and $443 for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Amortization expense related to customer intangibles, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses, was $27 and $32 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $81 and $97 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amounts in the table above as of September 30, 2015 reflect reductions of $623 in customer-related intangibles, net of accumulated amortization, and $607 in Services segment goodwill related to the Company’s sale of its railcar repair and maintenance services business on September 30, 2015 (see Note 21).

12

Table of Contents

The estimated future intangible amortization at September 30, 2015 is as follows:

The Company assesses the carrying value of goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently whenever events occur and circumstances change indicating potential impairment. On August 1, 2015, the Company performed its annual assessment and concluded that the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of the testing date.

Management determines the fair value of the reporting units using a combination of the income approach, utilizing the discounted cash flow method, and the market approach, utilizing the guideline company method. The negotiated sales price for the Company’s railcar maintenance and repair services business was used in evaluating goodwill impairment for the Services reporting unit as of August 1, 2015.

Note 11 – Product Warranties

Warranty terms are based on the negotiated railcar sales contracts. The Company typically warrants that new railcars produced by it will be free from defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service identified for a period of up to five years from the time of sale. The changes in the warranty reserve for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, are as follows:

Note 12 – State and Local Incentives

The Company records state and local incentives when there is reasonable assurance that the incentive will be received and the Company is able to comply with the conditions attached to the incentives received. State and local incentives related to assets are recorded as deferred income and recognized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the related assets of seven to nine years.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company received cash payments of $15,733 for Alabama state and local incentives related to the Company’s capital investment and employment levels at its Cherokee, Alabama (“Shoals”) facility. Under the incentive agreements, a certain portion of the incentives may be repayable by the Company if targeted levels of employment are not maintained. The Company’s level of employment at its Shoals facility currently exceeds and is expected to continue to exceed the targeted levels of employment.

13

Table of Contents

The changes in deferred income from state incentives for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, are as follows:

Note 13 – Revolving Credit Facility

The Company entered into a $50,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) pursuant to a Credit Agreement dated as of July 26, 2013 (the “Credit Agreement”) by and among FreightCar and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers (together the “Borrowers”), and Bank of America, N.A., as lender. The Revolving Credit Facility can be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement also contains a sub-facility for letters of credit not to exceed the lesser of $30,000 and the amount of the senior secured revolving credit facility at such time. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had $6,896 in outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility and therefore had $43,104 available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement has a term ending on July 26, 2016 and revolving loans outstanding thereunder will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 1.50% or at a base rate, as selected by the Company. Base rate loans will bear interest at the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the prime rate or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%. The Company is required to pay a non-utilization fee of between 0.10% and 0.30% on the unused portion of the revolving loan commitment depending on the Company’s quarterly average balance of unrestricted cash and the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a first priority perfected security interest in substantially all of the Borrowers’ assets excluding railcars held by the Company’s railcar leasing subsidiary, JAIX. The Borrowers also have pledged all of the equity interests in the Company’s direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries as security for the Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement has both affirmative and negative covenants, including, without limitation, a covenant requiring minimum consolidated net liquidity of $35,000 and limitations on indebtedness, liens and investments. The Credit Agreement also provides for customary events of default.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $6,015 in outstanding letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility and therefore had $43,985 available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.

14

Table of Contents

Note 14 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following:

15

Table of Contents

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of the following:

Note 15 – Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for stock option awards based on the fair value of the award on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Expected life in years for all stock options awards was determined using the simplified method. The Company believes that it is appropriate to use the simplified method in determining the expected life for options because the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term for stock options and due to the limited number of stock option grants to date. Expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury bond rate for the expected life of the option. The expected dividend yield was based on the latest annualized dividend rate and the current market price of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation for restricted stock awards over the vesting period based on the fair market value of the stock on the date of the award, calculated as the average of the high and low trading prices for the Company’s common stock on the award date.

Total stock-based compensation was $508 and $476 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $1,686 and $1,576 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, there was $2,556 of unearned compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards, which will be recognized over the remaining requisite service period of 27 months.

Note 16 – Employee Benefit Plans

The Company has qualified, defined benefit pension plans that were established to provide benefits to certain employees. These plans are frozen and participants are no longer accruing benefits. The Company also provides certain postretirement health care benefits for certain of its salaried and hourly retired employees. Generally, employees may become eligible for health care benefits if they retire after attaining specified age and service requirements. These benefits are subject to deductibles, co-payment provisions and other limitations.

A substantial portion of the Company’s postretirement benefit plan obligation relates to an expired settlement agreement with the union representing employees at the Company’s and its predecessors’ Johnstown manufacturing facilities. The terms of that settlement agreement (the “2005 Settlement Agreement”) required the Company to pay until November 30, 2012 certain monthly amounts toward the cost of retiree health care coverage. The Company engaged in voluntary negotiations for two years in an effort to reach a consensual agreement related to the expired 2005 Settlement Agreement but no agreement was reached. The Company terminated, effective November 1, 2013, its contributions for medical coverage and life insurance benefits to affected retirees and thereafter sought declaratory relief to confirm the Company’s rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), to reduce or terminate retiree medical coverage and life insurance benefits pursuant to the plans that were the subject of the 2005 Settlement Agreement. On July 9, 2013, the union and certain retiree defendants filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania regarding the same dispute (see Note 17). On August 15, 2015, the parties reached a settlement in principle of that dispute, which must be approved by the Court. Until final approval is obtained, the outcome of the pending litigation cannot be determined. The Company’s recorded postretirement benefit plan obligation assumes for accounting purposes a continuation of those monthly payments after November 30, 2012 (as was permitted under the settlement). However, the Company’s postretirement benefit plan obligation could significantly increase or decrease as a result of the litigation depending upon whether the parties’ preliminary settlement agreement is approved by the Pennsylvania court (see Note 17).

Generally, contributions to the plans are not less than the minimum amounts required under ERISA and not more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. The plans’ assets are held by independent trustees and consist primarily of equity and fixed income securities.

16

Table of Contents

The components of net periodic benefit cost (benefit) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, are as follows:

The Company made contributions to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans of $0 and $108 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $0 and $217 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company expects to make no contributions to its pension plans in 2015.

The Company made contributions to the Company’s postretirement benefit plan of $99 and $107 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $294 and $323 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company expects to make $409 in contributions (including contributions already made) to its postretirement benefit plan in 2015 for salaried retirees. However, because the Company’s postretirement benefit plan obligation is currently subject to litigation, the postretirement benefit contributions for hourly retirees, if any, are unknown at this time.

The Company also maintains qualified defined contribution plans, which provide benefits to employees based on employee contributions, employee earnings or certain subsidiary earnings, with discretionary contributions allowed. Expenses related to these plans were $836 and $443 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $2,199 and $1,142 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Note 17 – Contingencies

The Company is involved in various warranty and repair claims and, in certain cases, related pending and threatened legal proceedings with its customers in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company’s potential losses in excess of the accrued warranty and legal provisions, if any, are not expected to be material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On July 8, 2013, the Company filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (the “Complaint”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the “Illinois Court”). The case names as defendants the United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Services Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (the “USW”), as well as approximately 650 individual Retiree Defendants (as defined in the Complaint), and was assigned Case No 1:13-cv-4889.

As described in the Complaint, pursuant to the 2005 Settlement Agreement among the Company, the USW and the Retiree Defendants, the Company agreed to make certain levels of contributions to medical coverage for the Retiree Defendants and to continue to provide life insurance benefits at their amount at that time under certain of the Company’s employee welfare benefit plans. The 2005 Settlement Agreement expressly provided that, as of November 30, 2012, the Company could cease making these contributions. In June 2011, the Company and the USW began discussing the possibility of an extension beyond November 30, 2012 for the Company’s contributions to retiree medical coverage and life insurance benefits at a reduced amount and on other mutually acceptable terms. The Company engaged in voluntary negotiations for two years with the USW and counsel for the Retiree Defendants in an effort to reach a consensual agreement regarding such medical and life insurance benefits, but the parties were unable to reach a final agreement. The Company terminated, effective November 1, 2013, its contributions for medical coverage provided to the Retiree Defendants and the provision of life insurance benefits and is seeking declaratory relief to confirm its rights under ERISA to reduce or terminate retiree medical coverage and life insurance benefits pursuant to the plans that were the subject of the 2005 Settlement Agreement.

17

Table of Contents

On July 9, 2013, the USW and certain Retiree Defendants (collectively, the “Pennsylvania Plaintiffs”) filed a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Court”), captioned as Zanghi, et al. v. FreightCar America, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-146. The complaint filed with the Pennsylvania Court alleges that the Company does not have the right to terminate welfare benefits previously provided to the Retiree Defendants and requests, among other relief, entry of a judgment finding that the Retiree Defendants have a vested right to specified welfare benefits.

On July 26, 2013, the Pennsylvania Plaintiffs filed with the Illinois Court a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) or in the Alternative, to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), as well as a Motion to Stay and/or Prevent Plaintiff from Obtaining Defaults against the Retiree Defendants. On August 5, 2013, the Company filed with the Pennsylvania Court a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) or in the Alternative, to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). On January 14, 2014, the Pennsylvania Court denied the Company’s motion to dismiss and, on January 16, 2014, the Illinois Court transferred the Company’s case to the Pennsylvania Court. On January 31, 2014, the Company filed a motion to consolidate both cases before the Pennsylvania Court. On April 3, 2014, the Pennsylvania Court entered an order (the “Initial Procedural Order”) that, among other things, consolidated both cases before the Pennsylvania Court, certified a class for purposes of the consolidated actions, established discovery parameters and deadlines and established a briefing schedule applicable to the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment as to liability only. On July 17, 2014, the parties filed with the Pennsylvania Court their respective motions for summary judgment as to liability. On March 30, 2015, the Pennsylvania Court issued an order denying both parties’ summary judgment motions. A trial was scheduled to commence on August 25, 2015 in the Pennsylvania Court but was postponed pending settlement discussions between the parties. On August 20, 2015, the Company reached a preliminary settlement agreement with the USW and the other plaintiffs and, on September 21, 2015, the class representatives, the USW and the Company filed a Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement with the Pennsylvania Court. Pursuant to the proposed settlement agreement, the parties agreed that (1) USW will create a voluntary employee’s beneficiary association trust fund (the “VEBA”) that will administer the payment of health and welfare benefits to class members and will be administered independently of the Company, (2) the Company will make a one-time contribution to the VEBA of $31,450, (3) the Company will pay an award for plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees in an amount approved by the Pennsylvania Court not to exceed $1,300 (and, if the amount approved by the Pennsylvania Court is less than $1,300, the Company will contribute an amount equal to the difference to the VEBA), (4) if the Company fails to make the required payments to the VEBA prior to February 16, 2016, interest on the unpaid amounts will accrue at a rate of 5% per annum, subject to a cap of $250, and (5) class members will fully and finally release all claims against the Company in accordance with the terms of the proposed Settlement Agreement. Settlement of the lawsuit requires preliminary approval by the Pennsylvania Court and notice of the proposed settlement to class members, followed by a fairness hearing in which the Pennsylvania Court determines whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. Class members have the ability to object to the proposed settlement but not to opt out of the class. The Pennsylvania Court has granted preliminary approval to the proposed settlement and notice of the proposed settlement has been provided to class members. A fairness hearing on the proposed settlement has been scheduled for January 5, 2016. The ultimate outcome of the proceedings before the Pennsylvania Court cannot be determined at this time.

On September 5, 2013, the Pennsylvania Plaintiffs and certain putative class representatives filed a Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (the “TRO Motion”) with the Pennsylvania Court. In the TRO Motion, the plaintiffs requested that the Pennsylvania Court enter an injunction requiring the Company to continue to make monthly contributions at the same rate established by the 2005 Settlement Agreement until the parties’ dispute is fully adjudicated on the merits. Following entry of the Initial Procedural Order, the Pennsylvania Court denied the TRO Motion without prejudice.

The Company has recorded postretirement benefit plan obligations, a substantial portion of which relates to the dispute now before the Pennsylvania Court (see Note 16).

On April 17, 2015 and September 30, 2015, National Steel Car Limited filed Complaints for Patent Infringement against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaints seek injunctive relief and an unspecified amount of damages. The Company believes that the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against the allegations. While the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be determined at this time, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

18

Table of Contents

In addition to the foregoing, the Company is involved in certain other pending and threatened legal proceedings, including commercial disputes and workers’ compensation and employee matters arising out of the conduct of its business. While the ultimate outcome of these other legal proceedings cannot be determined at this time, it is the opinion of management that the resolution of these other actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 18 - Other Commitments

The Company leases certain property and equipment under long-term operating leases expiring at various dates through 2024. The leases generally contain specific renewal options at lease-end at the then fair market amounts.

Future minimum lease payments at September 30, 2015 are as follows:

The Company is liable for maintenance, insurance and similar costs under most of its leases and such costs are not included in the future minimum lease payments. Total rental expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, was approximately $2,606 and $2,331, respectively. Total rental expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, was approximately $7,807 and $7,000, respectively.

The Company is party to non-cancelable agreements with its suppliers to purchase certain materials used in the manufacturing process. The commitments may vary based on the actual quantities ordered and be subject to the actual price when ordered. At September 30, 2015, the Company had purchase commitments under these agreements as follows:

Note 19 – Earnings Per Share

Shares used in the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted earnings per common share are reconciled as follows:

19

Table of Contents

Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding include the incremental shares that would be issued upon the assumed exercise of stock options and the assumed vesting of nonvested share awards. For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, 637,022 and 366,964 shares, respectively, were not included in the weighted average common shares outstanding calculation as they were anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, 465,636 and 441,098 shares, respectively, were not included in the weighted average common shares outstanding calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

Note 20 – Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax provision was $8,047 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $4,608 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was 35.2% and was higher than the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to a blended state tax rate of 3.4%, the (2.1)% estimated impact of the domestic manufacturing deduction and the (1.1)% impact of state income tax credits. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was 41.7% and was higher than the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to a 7.5% blended state tax rate and the 1.1% impact of other differences, which were partially offset by the (1.9)% impact of changes in the valuation allowance.

The Company’s income tax provision was $10,457 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $252 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The Company’s effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was 34.2% and was lower than the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to the (2.3)% estimated impact of the domestic manufacturing deduction, the (1.8)% impact of state income tax credits and a blended state tax rate of 3.3%. The Company’s effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was 18.8% and was lower than the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% primarily due to the (29.1)% impact of changes in the valuation allowance, which was partially offset by a 6.8% blended state tax rate, the 5.4% impact of changes in uncertain tax positions and 0.7% for the effect of other differences.

Note 21 – Sale of Repair and Maintenance Services Business

On September 30, 2015, the Company sold its railcar repair and maintenance services business for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000. The sale included assets of FCRS, which operated the Company’s railcar repair and maintenance services business, and FCSL, which owned a short-line railway. The net book value of assets that were sold was $14,283, which included accounts receivable of $2,776, inventory of $2,537, property plant and equipment of $7,740 and intangible assets of $1,230. Through September 30, 2015, FCRS and FCSL were included in the Company’s Services segment. The sale will allow the Company to increase its focus on its railcar manufacturing, parts and leasing business as the Company continues to broaden its product portfolio through the introduction of new railcar types and implements operational improvements, enhancing productivity through training, technology and automation. The asset purchase agreement relating to the sale (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities. On September 30, 2015, $1,960 of the aggregate purchase price was placed into escrow (which is recorded as a long-term receivable) in order to secure the indemnification obligations of FCRS and FCSL under the Asset Purchase Agreement and $451 was used to settle certain liabilities of FCRS and FCSL, resulting in cash proceeds to the Company of $17,589. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the escrow amount, reduced by the amount of any pending claims, will be released to FCRS on each of the dates that are 18 months and three years after the closing date of the transaction and the remaining amount, reduced by the amount of any pending claims, will be released to FCRS on the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the transaction. As a result of the sale, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $4,578.

In December 2013, the Company closed its underperforming maintenance and repair shop in Clinton, Indiana, reduced the carrying values of repair shop assets to their estimated fair market value, representing the estimated salvage values of building, equipment and rail at the facility and the estimated sales value of the associated land, and recorded restructuring and impairment charges of $1,741. Sale of the repair shop assets to a strategic buyer in September 2014 resulted in a pre-tax gain of $1,078.

20

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

OVERVIEW

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

We believe we are the leading manufacturer of aluminum-bodied railcars and coal cars in North America, based on the number of railcars delivered. Our railcar manufacturing facilities are located in Cherokee, Alabama (“Shoals”), Danville, Illinois and Roanoke, Virginia. Our Shoals facility is an important part of our long-term growth strategy as we continue to expand our railcar product and service offerings outside of our traditional coal car market. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we announced a $10 million expansion at our Shoals facility to add additional production capacity to meet demand for our new types of railcars. The new production capacity became operational in the second quarter of 2015. During the first nine months of 2015, we added approximately 375 employees to support increased production levels at our Shoals facility.

Additionally, we refurbish and rebuild railcars and sell forged, cast and fabricated parts for all of the railcars we produce, as well as those manufactured by others. We also lease freight cars through our JAIX Leasing Company subsidiary. As of September 30, 2015, the value of leased railcars, consisting of railcars available for lease, was $16.1 million. Our primary customers are railroads, financial institutions and shippers.

Between November 2010, when we acquired the business assets of DTE Rail Services, Inc., and September 2015, we provided railcar repair and maintenance for all types of freight railcars through our FCRS subsidiary. On September 30, 2015, we sold our railcar repair and maintenance services business. The sale will allow us to increase our focus on our railcar manufacturing, parts and leasing business as we continue to broaden our product portfolio through the introduction of new railcar types and implement operational improvements, enhancing productivity through training, technology and automation. FCRS had repair and maintenance facilities in Grand Island, Nebraska and Hastings, Nebraska and serviced freight cars and unit coal trains utilizing key rail corridors in the Western regions of the United States.

We have two reportable segments, Manufacturing and Services. Our Manufacturing segment includes new railcar manufacturing, used railcar sales, railcar leasing and major railcar rebuilds. Through September 30, 2015, our Services segment included railcar repair and maintenance and parts sales. Corporate includes administrative activities and all other non-operating activities.

Total orders for railcars in the third quarter of 2015 were 1,008 units compared to 7,375 units ordered in the third quarter of 2014. All of the orders for the third quarter of 2015 were for new railcars while orders for the third quarter of 2014 consisted of 5,165 new railcars and 2,210 rebuilt railcars. Railcar deliveries totaled 2,846 units, consisting of 2,076 new railcars and 770 rebuilt railcars, in the third quarter of 2015 compared to 2,354 units, consisting of 1,554 new railcars and 800 rebuilt railcars, in the third quarter of 2014. Total backlog of unfilled orders was 12,237 units, consisting of 11,565 new railcars and 672 rebuilt railcars, at September 30, 2015, compared to 14,791 units, consisting of 12,191 new railcars and 2,600 rebuilt railcars, at December 31, 2014. The estimated sales value of the backlog was $1,117 million and $1,269 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

Revenues

Our consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were $241.1 million compared to $190.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Manufacturing segment revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were $233.3 million compared to $181.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in Manufacturing segment revenues for the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period reflects the increase in the number of railcars delivered and changes in product mix. Services segment revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were $7.8 million compared to $8.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in Services segment revenues for the 2015 period compared to the 2014 period reflects lower parts sales revenue, which was partially offset by higher repair volumes.

21

Table of Contents