FS Bancorp, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ________

Commission File Number: 333-177125

FS BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Washington		45-4585178
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

6920 220th Street SW, Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043

(Address of principal executive offices; Zip Code)

(425) 771-5299

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer [ ]		Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of August 5, 2016, there were 3,054,753 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock.



Table of Contents

FS Bancorp, Inc.

Form 10-Q

Table of Contents



		Page Number
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (Unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited)	6 - 7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8 - 38

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	39 - 48

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	48

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	49

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	49

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	49

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	49 - 50

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	50

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	50

Item 5.	Other Information	50

Item 6.	Exhibits	50 - 51

SIGNATURES		52

As used in this report, the terms “we,” “our,” and “us,” and “Company” refer to FS Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary, unless the context indicates otherwise. When we refer to “Bank” in this report, we are referring to 1st Security Bank of Washington, the wholly owned subsidiary of FS Bancorp, Inc.



Table of Contents

Item 1. Financial Statements

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) (Unaudited)



ASSETS	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Cash and due from banks	$	5,263		$	1,708
Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions	9,629			22,747
Total cash and cash equivalents	14,892			24,455
Certificates of deposit at other financial institutions	14,010			12,421
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value	97,728			55,217
Loans held for sale, at fair value	63,696			44,925
Loans receivable, net	550,104			502,535
Accrued interest receivable	2,420			2,107
Premises and equipment, net	14,786			13,856
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, at cost	1,600			4,551
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)	9,911			9,772
Servicing rights, held at the lower of cost or fair value	6,751			5,811
Goodwill	2,312			—
Core deposit intangible, net	1,997			—
Other assets	3,713			1,911
TOTAL ASSETS	$	783,920		$	677,561

LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing accounts	$	152,808		$	72,247
Interest-bearing accounts	513,308			412,931
Total deposits	666,116			485,178
Borrowings	19,670			98,769
Subordinated note:
Principal amount	10,000			10,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(185		)	(195		)
Total subordinated note less unamortized debt issuance costs	9,815			9,805
Other liabilities	12,268			8,469
Total liabilities	707,869			602,221
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 9)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 3,056,107 and 3,242,120 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively	31			32
Additional paid-in capital	26,516			30,692
Retained earnings	50,160			46,175
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	848			78
Unearned shares - Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)	(1,504		)	(1,637		)
Total stockholders’ equity	76,051			75,340
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	783,920		$	677,561

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.



		2



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
INTEREST INCOME
Loans receivable including fees	$	8,452		$	7,494	$	16,773		$	14,312
Interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions	636			281		1,213			545
Total interest and dividend income	9,088			7,775		17,986			14,857
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	785			812		1,603			1,559
Borrowings	42			72		127			139
Subordinated note	169			—		341			—
Total interest expense	996			884		2,071			1,698
NET INTEREST INCOME	8,092			6,891		15,915			13,159
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	600			600		1,200			1,200
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	7,492			6,291		14,715			11,959
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges and fee income	893			500		1,590			924
Gain on sale of loans	5,437			4,606		8,801			7,933
Gain on sale of investment securities	—			—		—			76
Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI	70			48		139			95
Other noninterest income	156			124		347			321
Total noninterest income	6,556			5,278		10,877			9,349
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and benefits	5,358			4,216		10,223			8,166
Operations	1,396			1,128		2,771			2,091
Occupancy	610			456		1,178			891
Data processing	557			393		1,039			751
Gain on sale of other real estate owned (“OREO”)	(150		)	—		(150		)	—
Loan costs	638			417		1,074			750
Professional and board fees	524			423		989			790
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance	106			82		208			160
Marketing and advertising	207			145		351			275
Acquisition costs	4			—		389			—
Amortization of core deposit intangible	140			—		241			—
Impairment on servicing rights	215			1		214			—
Total noninterest expense	9,605			7,261		18,527			13,874
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES	4,443			4,308		7,065			7,434
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES	1,608			1,514		2,569			2,570
NET INCOME	$	2,835		$	2,794	$	4,496		$	4,864
Basic earnings per share	$	0.98		$	0.94	$	1.54		$	1.65
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.96		$	0.93	$	1.50		$	1.63

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.



		3



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands) (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net Income	$	2,835		$	2,794		$	4,496		$	4,864
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized holding gain (loss) during period	617			(474		)	1,195			(138		)
Income tax (provision) benefit related to unrealized holding gain	(219		)	161			(425		)	47
Reclassification adjustment for realized gain included in net income	—			—			—			(76		)
Income tax provision related to reclassification for realized gain	—			—			—			26
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	398			(313		)	770			(141		)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	3,233		$	2,481		$	5,266		$	4,723

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.



		4



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) (Unaudited)



	Common Stock											Accumulated
	Shares		Amount			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Other Comprehensive Income			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders’ Equity
BALANCE, January 1, 2015	3,235,625		$	32		$	29,450		$	38,125		$	117		$	(1,888	)	$	65,836
Net income	—		—			—			4,864			—			—			4,864
Dividends paid ($0.12 per share)	—		—			—			(397		)	—			—			(397		)
Share-based compensation	—		—			373			—			—			—			373
Common stock repurchased	(4,605	)	—			(101		)	—			—			—			(101		)
Stock options exercised	9,600		—			162			—			—			—			162
Unrealized holding gains, net of tax	—		—			—			—			(141		)	—			(141		)
ESOP shares allocated	—		—			127			—			—			132			259
BALANCE, June 30, 2015	3,240,620		$	32		$	30,011		$	42,592		$	(24	)	$	(1,756	)	$	70,855

BALANCE, January 1, 2016	3,242,120		$	32		$	30,692		$	46,175		$	78		$	(1,637	)	$	75,340
Net income	—		—			—			4,496			—			—			4,496
Dividends paid ($0.17 per share)	—		—			—			(511		)	—			—			(511		)
Share-based compensation	—		—			393			—			—			—			393
Restricted stock awards	4,500		—			—			—			—			—			—
Common stock repurchased	(196,813	)	(1		)	(4,868		)	—			—			—			(4,869		)
Stock options exercised	6,300		—			106			—			—			—			106
Unrealized holding gains, net of tax	—		—			—			—			770			—			770
ESOP shares allocated	—		—			193			—			—			133			326
BALANCE, June 30, 2016	3,056,107		$	31		$	26,516		$	50,160		$	848		$	(1,504	)	$	76,051

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.



		5



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



(In thousands) (Unaudited)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	2016			2015
Net income	$	4,496		$	4,864
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities
Provision for loan losses	1,200			1,200
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	2,406			957
Compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock awards	393			373
ESOP compensation expense for allocated shares	326			259
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI	(139		)	(95		)
Gain on sale of loans held for sale	(8,801		)	(7,933		)
Gain on sale of OREO	(150		)	—
Origination of loans held for sale	(354,401		)	(296,744		)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale	342,698			287,763
Gain on sale of investment securities	—			(76		)
Impairment of servicing rights	214			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accrued interest receivable	(313		)	(214		)
Other assets	(6,359		)	(1,365		)
Other liabilities	3,375			589
Net cash used by operating activities	(15,055		)	(10,422		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Activity in securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from sale of investment securities	—			4,178
Maturities, prepayments, sales, and calls	5,797			2,727
Purchases	(47,432		)	(8,907		)
Maturities of interest-bearing time deposits	292			248
Purchase of interest-bearing time deposits	(1,882		)	(3,224		)
Loan originations and principal collections, net	(49,839		)	(46,120		)
Proceeds from sale of OREO, net	682			—
Purchase of premises and equipment, net	(1,642		)	(952		)
FHLB stock purchased	(3,393		)	(1,226		)
FHLB stock redeemed	6,344			1,464
Net cash received from acquisition of branches	180,356			—
Net cash from (used by) investing activities	89,283			(51,812		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits	582			50,064
Proceeds from borrowings	159,500			199,737
Repayments of borrowings	(238,599		)	(196,502		)
Dividends paid	(511		)	(397		)
Proceeds from stock options exercised	106			162
Common stock repurchased	(4,869		)	(101		)
Net cash (used by) from financing activities	(83,791		)	52,963
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(9,563		)	(9,271		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period	24,455			15,555
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	14,892		$	6,284



		6



Table of Contents



SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	1,910	$	1,700
Income taxes	$	2,970	$	2,151
Assets acquired in acquisition of branches	$	181,575	$	—
Liabilities assumed in acquisition of branches	$	186,393	$	—
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH OPERATING, INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities	$	1,195	$	(214	)
Property received in settlement of loans	$	525	$	—
Retention of mortgage servicing rights from loan sales	$	1,832	$	1,902

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.



		7



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations - FS Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in September 2011 as the proposed holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington (the “Bank” or “1st Security Bank”) in connection with the Bank’s conversion from the mutual to stock form of ownership which was completed on July 9, 2012. The Bank is a community-based savings bank with 11 branches and four loan production offices in suburban communities in the greater Puget Sound area which includes Snohomish, King, Pierce, Jefferson, Kitsap, and Clallam Counties, and one loan production office in the market area of the Tri-Cities, Washington. The Bank provides loan and deposit services to customers who are predominantly small and middle-market businesses and individuals. The Bank acquired four retail bank branches from Bank of America (two in Clallam and two in Jefferson counties) on January 22, 2016, and these branches opened as 1st Security Bank branches on January 25, 2016. The Company and its subsidiary are subject to regulation by certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examination by these regulatory agencies.

Pursuant to the Plan of Conversion (the “Plan”), the Company’s Board of Directors adopted an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) which purchased 8% of the common stock in the open market or 259,210 shares. As provided for in the Plan, the Bank also established a liquidation account in the amount of retained earnings at December 31, 2011. The liquidation account is maintained for the benefit of eligible savings account holders at June 30, 2007, and supplemental eligible account holders as of March 31, 2012, who maintain deposit accounts at the Bank after the conversion. The conversion was accounted for as a change in corporate form with the historic basis of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and equity unchanged as a result.

Financial Statement Presentation - The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). It is recommended that these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K with all of the audited information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on March 25, 2016. In the opinion of management, all normal adjustments and recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included.

The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016, or any other future period. The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in the near term are allowances for loan losses, fair value of measurements, servicing assets, and deferred income taxes.

Amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and footnote tables are rounded and presented in thousands of dollars except per share amounts. In the narrative footnote discussion, amounts are rounded and presented in millions of dollars to one decimal point if the amounts are above $1.0 million. Amounts below $1.0 million are rounded and presented in dollars to the nearest thousands. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 presentation with no change to consolidated net income or stockholders’ equity previously reported.

Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FS Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, 1st Security Bank of Washington. All material intercompany accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Segment Reporting - The Company’s major line of business is community banking. Management has determined that the Company operates as a single operating segment based on U.S. GAAP.

Subsequent Events - The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to June 30, 2016, for potential recognition or disclosure.



		8



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Application of New Accounting Guidance

As of April 1, 2016, the Company applied Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805). Application of this ASU simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination during the measurement period. The amendments in this ASU require that the acquirer recognize the adjustments to provisional amounts in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer must also record in the same period's financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. As required by ASU 2015-16, all adjustments are reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year, January 1, 2016. By applying this ASU, the Company has adjusted the provisional amounts for core deposit intangible and goodwill and disclosed the effect on earnings in Note 2.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which creates Topic 606 and supersedes Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which postponed the effective date of 2014-09. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net, which amended the principal versus agent implementation guidance set for in ASU 2014-09. Among other things, ASU 2016-08 clarifies that an entity should evaluate whether it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The ASU amends certain aspects of the guidance set forth in the FASB's new revenue standard related to identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation. The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In general, the new guidance requires companies to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance, including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-11, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting, which rescinds SEC paragraphs pursuant to two SEC Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting which were codified in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and Topic 932, Extractive Activities - Oil and Gas. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and adds some practical expedients, but does not change the core revenue recognition principle in Topic 606. The standard is effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is not permitted. For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The ASU is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. This ASU requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the amendments in this ASU require the exit price notion be used when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes and requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. This ASU also eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The ASU also requires a reporting organization



		9



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument specific credit risk (also referred to as “own credit”) when the organization has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for certain provisions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities arising from operating leases. A lessee should recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. A lessee should include payments to be made in an optional period only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. For a finance lease, interest payments should be recognized separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income. For operating leases, the lease cost should be allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendments in the ASU is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. The ASU simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call or put options by removing the requirement to assess whether a contingent event is related to interest rates or credit risks. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. The ASU eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an adjustment must be made to the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in this update seek to simplify several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The ASU is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The ASU requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. Organizations will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. In addition, the



		10



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2 - BUSINESS COMBINATION

On January 22, 2016, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, 1st Security Bank, completed the purchase of four branches (“Branch Purchase”) from Bank of America, National Association (“Bank of America”). The Branch Purchase included four retail bank branches located in the communities of Port Angeles, Sequim, Port Townsend, and Hadlock, Washington.

In accordance with the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015, between Bank of America and 1st Security Bank, 1st Security Bank acquired $186.4 million of deposits, a small portfolio of performing loans, two owned bank branches, three leases for the bank branches and parking facilities and certain other assets of the branches. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $171.3 million of the acquired deposits remain at 1st Security Bank.

In consideration of the purchased assets and transferred liabilities, 1st Security Bank paid (a) the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest of $419,000 for the loans acquired, (b) the net book value, or approximately $778,000, for the bank facilities and certain other assets associated with the acquired branches, and (c) a deposit premium of 2.50% on substantially all of the deposits assumed, which equated to approximately $4.8 million. The transaction was settled with Bank of America paying cash of $180.4 million to 1st Security Bank for the difference between these amounts and the total deposits assumed.

The Branch Purchase was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, the assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values on January 22, 2016, the date of acquisition. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as information relative to closing date fair values become available. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company completed a re-evaluation of the core deposit intangible due to a portion of core deposits excluded from the original valuation. The updated valuation of the core deposit intangible increased the fair value adjustment by $100,000 to $2.2 million from $2.1 million resulting in a decrease of $100,000 to the fair value adjustment of goodwill. The impact to consolidated net income was an increase in the amortization of the core deposit intangible for the six month ended June 30, 2016 of $6,000.



		11



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:



January 22, 2016	Acquired Book Value		Fair Value Adjustments			Amount Recorded
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	180,356	$	—		$	180,356
Loans receivable	417		—			417
Premises and equipment, net	697		267		⁽¹⁾	964
Accrued interest receivable	2		—			2
Core deposit intangible	—		2,239		⁽²⁾	2,239
Goodwill	—		2,312		⁽³⁾	2,312
Other assets	103		—			103
Total assets acquired	$	181,575	$	4,818		$	186,393

Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing accounts	$	79,966	$	—		$	79,966
Interest-bearing accounts	106,398		—			106,398
Total deposits	186,364		—			186,364
Accrued interest payable	7		—			7
Other liabilities	22		—			22
Total liabilities assumed	$	186,393	$	—		$	186,393

Explanation of Fair Value Adjustments

(1) The fair value adjustment represents the difference between the fair value of the acquired branches and the book value of the assets acquired. The Company utilized third-party valuations but did not receive appraisals to assist in the determination of fair value.

(2) The fair value adjustment represents the value of the core deposit base assumed in the Branch Purchase based on a study performed by an independent consulting firm. This amount was recorded by the Company as an identifiable intangible asset and will be amortized as an expense on an accelerated basis over the average life of the core deposit base, which is estimated to be nine years.

(3) The fair value adjustment represents the value of the goodwill calculated from the purchase based on the purchase price, less the fair value of assets acquired net of liabilities assumed.

In connection with the business combination, the Company recorded goodwill and core deposit intangible assessed at the date of the Branch Purchase.

Goodwill - The acquired goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired and was recorded at $2.3 million.



		12



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below summarizes the aggregate amount recognized for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed by 1st Security Bank in the Branch Purchase on January 22, 2016:



	At January 22, 2016
Purchase price ⁽¹⁾	$	6,015
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and (liabilities assumed), at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents	186,371
Acquired loans	417
Premises and equipment, net	964
Accrued interest receivable	2
Core deposit intangible	2,239
Other assets	103
Deposits	(186,364		)
Accrued interest payable	(7		)
Other liabilities	(22		)
Total fair value of identifiable net assets	3,703
Goodwill	$	2,312

(1) Purchase price includes premium paid on the deposits, the aggregate net book value of all assets acquired, and the unpaid principal and accrued interest on loans acquired.

Core deposit intangible

The acquired core deposit intangible represents the fair value of the acquired core deposit base. The core deposit intangible will be amortized on an accelerated basis over approximately nine years. Total amortization expense was $140,000 and $241,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and none for the same periods in 2015. Amortization expense for core deposit intangible is expected to be as follows:



Year 1	$	522
Year 2	400
Year 3	307
Year 4	235
Year 5	181
Thereafter	594
Total	$	2,239



		13



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE

The following tables present the amortized costs, unrealized gains, unrealized losses, and estimated fair values of securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Values
U.S. agency securities	$	9,165	$	165	$	—		$	9,330
Municipal bonds	25,459		601		(9		)	26,051
Corporate securities	7,675		58		(161		)	7,572
U.S. Small Business Administration securities	5,966		137		—			6,103
Mortgage-backed securities	48,148		527		(3		)	48,672
Total securities available-for-sale	$	96,413	$	1,488	$	(173	)	$	97,728

	December 31, 2015
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Values
U.S. agency securities	$	6,134	$	—	$	(99	)	$	6,035
Municipal bonds	18,531		373		(13		)	18,891
Corporate securities	3,495		5		(67		)	3,433
U.S. Small Business Administration securities	4,011		23		(11		)	4,023
Mortgage-backed securities	22,926		72		(163		)	22,835
Total securities available-for-sale	$	55,097	$	473	$	(353	)	$	55,217

Investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are presented in the following tables, based on the length of time individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position. In the opinion of management, these securities are considered only temporarily impaired due to changes in market interest rates or the widening of market spreads subsequent to the initial purchase of the securities, and not due to concerns regarding the underlying credit of the issuers or the underlying collateral.



	June 30, 2016
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. agency securities	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Municipal bonds	2,432		(8		)	303		(1		)	2,735		(9		)
Corporate securities	908		(88		)	1,427		(73		)	2,335		(161		)
U.S. Small Business Administration securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Mortgage-backed securities	—		—			1,777		(3		)	1,777		(3		)
Total	$	3,340	$	(96	)	$	3,507	$	(77	)	$	6,847	$	(173	)



		14



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



	December 31, 2015
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. agency securities	$	2,107	$	(31	)	$	3,928	$	(68	)	$	6,035	$	(99	)
Municipal bonds	956		(1		)	293		(12		)	1,249		(13		)
Corporate securities	994		(6		)	1,439		(61		)	2,433		(67		)
U.S. Small Business Administration securities	990		(11		)	—		—			990		(11		)
Mortgage-backed securities	15,642		(112		)	2,119		(51		)	17,761		(163		)
Total	$	20,689	$	(161	)	$	7,779	$	(192	)	$	28,468	$	(353	)

There were three investments with unrealized losses of less than one year, and five investments with unrealized losses of more than one year at June 30, 2016. There were 17 investments with unrealized losses of less than one year, and eight investments with unrealized losses of more than one year at December 31, 2015. The unrealized losses associated with these investments are believed to be caused by changes in market interest rates that are considered to be temporary and the Company does not intend to sell the securities, and it is not likely to be required to sell these securities prior to maturity. No other-than-temporary impairment was recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

The contractual maturities of securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are listed below. Expected maturities of mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the obligations; therefore, these securities are classified separately with no specific maturity date.



	June 30, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
U.S. agency securities
Due after one year through five years	$	4,000	$	4,008	$	—	$	—
Due after five years through ten years	5,165		5,322		6,134		6,035
Subtotal	9,165		9,330		6,134		6,035
Municipal bonds
Due in one year or less	982		985		991		997
Due after one year through five years	7,481		7,615		3,904		3,954
Due after five years through ten years	11,303		11,618		7,807		7,981
Due after ten years	5,693		5,833		5,829		5,959
Subtotal	25,459		26,051		18,531		18,891
Corporate securities
Due after one year through five years	5,680		5,723		1,500		1,490
Due after five years through ten years	1,995		1,849		1,995		1,943
Subtotal	7,675		7,572		3,495		3,433
U.S. Small Business Administration securities
Due after five years through ten years	5,966		6,103		4,011		4,023
Mortgage-backed securities
Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”)	23,846		24,104		12,515		12,466
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”)	16,319		16,501		4,524		4,501
Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”)	7,983		8,067		5,887		5,868
Subtotal	48,148		48,672		22,926		22,835
Total	$	96,413	$	97,728	$	55,097	$	55,217



		15



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The proceeds and resulting gains, computed using specific identification, from sales of securities available-for-sale for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016						Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Proceeds		Gross Gains		Gross Losses		Proceeds		Gross Gains		Gross Losses
Securities available-for-sale	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015						Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Proceeds		Gross Gains		Gross Losses		Proceeds		Gross Gains		Gross Losses
Securities available-for-sale	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,178	$	76	$	—

NOTE 4 - LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was as follows:



	June 30,			December 31,
REAL ESTATE LOANS	2016			2015
Commercial	$	50,936		$	50,034
Construction and development	76,601			80,806
Home equity	18,591			16,540
One-to-four-family (excludes loans held for sale)	115,450			102,921
Multi-family	34,176			22,223
Total real estate loans	295,754			272,524
CONSUMER LOANS
Indirect home improvement	102,246			103,064
Solar	33,364			29,226
Marine	28,128			23,851
Other consumer	1,998			2,181
Total consumer loans	165,736			158,322
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS
Commercial and industrial	64,413			59,619
Warehouse lending	34,659			20,817
Total commercial business loans	99,072			80,436
Total loans receivable, gross	560,562			511,282
Allowance for loan losses	(8,951		)	(7,785		)
Deferred costs, fees, and discounts, net	(1,507		)	(962		)
Total loans receivable, net	$	550,104		$	502,535

The Company’s lending business activity is concentrated in the greater Puget Sound area and one loan production office located in the Tri-Cities, Washington. Most of the Company’s lending is to customers located in the greater Puget Sound area, however, indirect home improvement loans are originated through a network of home improvement contractors and dealers located throughout Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California. The Company also originates solar loans through



		16



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

contractors and dealers in the state of California. Generally, loans are secured by real estate, liens on receivables and/or equipment, personal property, and/or deposit accounts. Rights to collateral vary and are legally documented to the extent practicable. Local economic conditions may affect borrowers’ ability to meet the stated repayment terms.

The Company has defined its loan portfolio into three segments that reflect the structure of the lending function, the Company’s strategic plan and the manner in which management monitors performance and credit quality. The three loan portfolio segments are: (a) Real Estate Loans, (b) Consumer Loans and (c) Commercial Business Loans. Each of these segments is disaggregated into classes based on the risk characteristics of the borrower and/or the collateral type securing the loan. The following is a summary of each of the Company’s loan portfolio segments and classes:

Real Estate Loans

Commercial Lending. Loans originated by the Company primarily secured by income producing properties, including retail centers, warehouses, and office buildings located in our market areas.

Construction and Development Lending. Loans originated by the Company for the construction of, and secured by, commercial real estate, one-to-four-family, and multi-family residences and tracts of land for development that are not pre-sold.

Home Equity Lending. Loans originated by the Company secured by second mortgages on one-to-four-family residences in our market areas.

One-to-Four-Family Real Estate Lending. Loans originated by the Company secured by first mortgages on one-to-four-family residences in our market areas that the Company intends to hold (excludes loans held for sale).

Multi-Family Lending. Apartment term lending (five or more units) to current banking customers and community reinvestment loans for low to moderate income individuals in the Company’s footprint.

Consumer Loans

Indirect Home Improvement. Fixture secured loans are originated by the Company for home improvement and are secured by the personal property installed in, on, or at the borrower’s real property, and may be perfected with a UCC-2 financing statement filed in the county of the borrower’s residence. These indirect home improvement loans include replacement windows, siding, roofing, and other home fixture installations.

Solar. Fixture secured loans are originated by the Company for home improvement and are secured by the personal property installed in, on, or at the borrower’s real property, and may be perfected with a UCC-2 financing statement filed in the county of the borrower’s residence.

Marine. Loans originated by the Company secured by boats to borrowers primarily located in its market areas.

Other Consumer. Loans originated by the Company, including automobiles, recreational vehicles, direct home improvement loans, loans on deposits, and other consumer loans, primarily consisting of personal lines of credit.

Commercial Business Loans

Commercial and Industrial Lending. Loans originated by the Company to local small and mid-sized businesses in our Puget Sound market area are secured primarily by accounts receivable, inventory, or personal property, plant and equipment. Commercial and industrial loans are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business.

Warehouse Lending. Loans originated by the Company’s mortgage and construction warehouse lending program through which the Company funds third-party bankers originating residential mortgage and construction loans for sale into the



		17



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

secondary market. These loans are secured by the notes and assigned deeds of trust associated with the residential mortgage and construction loans on properties primarily located in the Company’s market areas.

The following tables detail activity in the allowance for loan losses by loan categories at or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES	Real Estate			Consumer			Commercial Business		Unallocated		Total
Beginning balance	$	3,456		$	2,084		$	1,543	$	1,244	$	8,327
Provision for loan losses	(28		)	50			210		368		600
Charge-offs	—			(291		)	—		—		(291		)
Recoveries	49			196			70		—		315
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	49			(95		)	70		—		24
Ending balance	$	3,477		$	2,039		$	1,823	$	1,612	$	8,951
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	3,477			2,039			1,823		1,612		8,951
Ending balance	$	3,477		$	2,039		$	1,823	$	1,612	$	8,951
LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	291		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	291
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	295,463			165,736			99,072		—		560,271
Ending balance	$	295,754		$	165,736		$	99,072	$	—	$	560,562



	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES	Real Estate		Consumer			Commercial Business		Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	2,874	$	1,681		$	1,396	$	1,834		7,785
Provision for loan losses	552		518			352		(222		)	1,200
Charge-offs	—		(569		)	—		—			(569		)
Recoveries	51		409			75		—			535
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	51		(160		)	75		—			(34		)
Ending balance	$	3,477	$	2,039		$	1,823	$	1,612		$	8,951
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	3,477		2,039			1,823		1,612			8,951
Ending balance	$	3,477	$	2,039		$	1,823	$	1,612		$	8,951
LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	291	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	291
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	295,463		165,736			99,072		—			560,271
Ending balance	$	295,754	$	165,736		$	99,072	$	—		$	560,562



		18



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES	Real Estate			Consumer			Commercial Business			Unallocated		Total
Beginning balance	$	2,125		$	1,438		$	2,134		$	708	$	6,405
Provision for loan losses	119			187			45			249		600
Charge-offs	(57		)	(328		)	(34		)	—		(419		)
Recoveries	191			147			3			—		341
Net recoveries (charge-offs)	134			(181		)	(31		)	—		(78		)
Ending balance	$	2,378		$	1,444		$	2,148		$	957	$	6,927
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	2,378			1,444			2,148			957		6,927
Ending balance	$	2,378		$	1,444		$	2,148		$	957	$	6,927
LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,468		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	1,468
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	213,374			149,531			75,595			—		438,500
Ending balance	$	214,842		$	149,531		$	75,595		$	—	$	439,968



	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES	Real Estate			Consumer			Commercial Business			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	1,872		$	1,431		$	1,184		$	1,603		$	6,090
Provision for loan losses	563			290			993			(646		)	1,200
Charge-offs	(248		)	(745		)	(34		)	—			(1,027		)
Recoveries	191			468			5			—			664
Net charge-offs	(57		)	(277		)	(29		)	—			(363		)
Ending balance	$	2,378		$	1,444		$	2,148		$	957		$	6,927
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	2,378			1,444			2,148			957			6,927
Ending balance	$	2,378		$	1,444		$	2,148		$	957		$	6,927
LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,468		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,468
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	213,374			149,531			75,595			—			438,500
Ending balance	$	214,842		$	149,531		$	75,595		$	—		$	439,968



		19



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables provide information pertaining to the aging analysis of past due loans at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016
REAL ESTATE LOANS	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	50,936	$	50,936
Construction and development	—		—		—		—		—		76,601		76,601
Home equity	19		33		—		219		271		18,320		18,591
One-to-four-family	—		—		—		39		39		115,411		115,450
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		—		34,176		34,176
Total real estate loans	19		33		—		258		310		295,444		295,754
CONSUMER LOANS
Indirect home improvement	270		147		—		300		717		101,529		102,246
Solar	7		10		—		—		17		33,347		33,364
Marine	17		—		—		—		17		28,111		28,128
Other consumer	26		1		—		2		29		1,969		1,998
Total consumer loans	320		158		—		302		780		164,956		165,736
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS
Commercial and industrial	—		—		—		60		60		64,353		64,413
Warehouse lending	—		—		—		—		—		34,659		34,659
Total commercial business loans	—		—		—		60		60		99,012		99,072
Total loans	$	339	$	191	$	—	$	620	$	1,150	$	559,412	$	560,562



	December 31, 2015
REAL ESTATE LOANS	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due and Accruing		Non-Accrual		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	50,034	$	50,034
Construction and development	—		—		—		—		—		80,806		80,806
Home equity	157		20		—		47		224		16,316		16,540
One-to-four-family	48		—		—		525		573		102,348		102,921
Multi-family	—		—		—		—		—		22,223		22,223
Total real estate loans	205		20		—		572		797		271,727		272,524
CONSUMER LOANS
Indirect home improvement	266		154		—		408		828		102,236		103,064
Solar	69		—		—		37		106		29,120		29,226
Marine	28		—		—		—		28		23,823		23,851
Other consumer	—		—		—		—		—		2,181		2,181
Total consumer loans	363		154		—		445		962		157,360		158,322
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS
Commercial and industrial	—		—		—		—		—		59,619		59,619
Warehouse lending	—		—		—		—		—		20,817		20,817
Total commercial business loans	—		—		—		—		—		80,436		80,436
Total loans	$	568	$	174	$	—	$	1,017	$	1,759	$	509,523	$	511,282



		20



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables provide additional information about our impaired loans that have been segregated to reflect loans for which an allowance for credit losses has been provided and loans for which no allowance has been provided at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016
WITH NO RELATED ALLOWANCE RECORDED	Unpaid Principal Balance		Write- downs			Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Adjusted Recorded Investment
Home equity	$	194	$	—		$	194	$	—	$	194
One-to-four-family	109		(12		)	97		—		97
Total	$	303	$	(12	)	$	291	$	—	$	291

	December 31, 2015
WITH NO RELATED ALLOWANCE RECORDED	Unpaid Principal Balance		Write- downs			Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Adjusted Recorded Investment
One-to-four-family	$	801	$	(67	)	$	734	$	—	$	734

The following table presents the average recorded investment in loans individually evaluated for impairment and the interest income recognized and received for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2016				June 30, 2015
WITH NO RELATED ALLOWANCE RECORDED	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	767	$	22
Home equity	195		1		153		1
One-to-four-family	99		1		796		11
	294		2		1,716		34
WITH AN ALLOWANCE RECORDED
Commercial and industrial	—		—		12		—
Total	$	294	$	2	$	1,728	$	34



	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016				June 30, 2015
WITH NO RELATED ALLOWANCE RECORDED	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Commercial	$	—	—		992		38
Home equity	196		2		131		4
One-to-four-family	101		3		798		26
	297		5		1,921		68
WITH AN ALLOWANCE RECORDED
Commercial and industrial	—		—		25		—
Total	$	297	$	5	$	1,946	$	68



		21



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Credit Quality Indicators

As part of the Company’s on-going monitoring of credit quality of the loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) the risk grading of loans, (ii) the level of classified loans, (iii) net charge-offs, (iv) non-performing loans and (v) the general economic conditions in the Company’s markets.

The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to its real estate and commercial business loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 10, with loans in risk grades 1 to 6 considered “Pass” and loans in risk grades 7 to 10 are reported as classified loans in the Company’s allowance for loan loss analysis.

A description of the 10 risk grades is as follows:


•	Grades 1 and 2 - These grades include loans to very high quality borrowers with excellent or desirable business credit.


•	Grade 3 - This grade includes loans to borrowers of good business credit with moderate risk.


•	Grades 4 and 5 - These grades include “Pass” grade loans to borrowers of average credit quality and risk.


•	Grade 6 - This grade includes loans on management’s “Watch” list and is intended to be utilized on a temporary basis for “Pass” grade borrowers where frequent and thorough monitoring is required due to credit weaknesses and where significant risk-modifying action is anticipated in the near term.


•	Grade 7 - This grade is for “Other Assets Especially Mentioned” ( “OAEM”) in accordance with regulatory guidelines and includes borrowers where performance is poor or significantly less than expected.


•	Grade 8 - This grade includes “Substandard” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines which represent an unacceptable business credit where a loss is possible if loan weakness is not corrected.


•	Grade 9 - This grade includes “Doubtful” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines where a loss is highly probable.


•	Grade 10 - This grade includes “Loss” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines for which total loss is expected and when identified are charged off.

Consumer, Home Equity and One-to-Four-Family Real Estate Loans

Homogeneous loans are risk rated based upon the FDIC’s Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy. Loans classified under this policy at the Company are consumer loans which include indirect home improvement, solar, marine, other consumer, and one-to-four-family first and second liens. Under the Uniform Retail Credit Classification Policy, loans that are current or less than 90 days past due are graded “Pass” and risk rated “4” or “5” internally. Loans that are past due more than 90 days are classified “Substandard” and risk rated “8” internally until the loan has demonstrated consistent performance, typically six months of contractual payments. Closed-end loans that are 120 days past due and open-end loans that are 180 days past due are charged off based on the value of the collateral less cost to sell.



		22



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables summarize risk rated loan balances by category at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30, 2016
REAL ESTATE LOANS	Pass (1 - 5)		Watch (6)		Special Mention (7)		Substandard (8)		Doubtful(9)		Loss (10)		Total
Commercial	$	49,253	$	1,683	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	50,936
Construction and development	76,601		—		—		—		—		—		76,601
Home equity	18,372		—		—		219		—		—		18,591
One-to-four-family	115,411		—		—		39		—		—		115,450
Multi-family	34,176		—		—		—		—		—		34,176
Total real estate loans	293,813		1,683		—		258		—		—		295,754
CONSUMER LOANS
Indirect home improvement	101,944		—		—		302		—		—		102,246
Solar	33,364		—		—		—		—		—		33,364
Marine	28,128		—		—		—		—		—		28,128
Other consumer	1,998		—		—		—		—		—		1,998
Total consumer loans	165,434		—		—		302		—		—		165,736
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS
Commercial and industrial	60,725		716		401		2,571		—		—		64,413
Warehouse lending	34,659		—		—		—		—		—		34,659
Total commercial business loans	95,384		716		401		2,571		—		—		99,072
Total loans	$	554,631	$	2,399	$	401	$	3,131	$	—	$	—	$	560,562



	December 31, 2015
REAL ESTATE LOANS	Pass (1 - 5)		Watch (6)		Special Mention (7)		Substandard (8)		Doubtful(9)		Loss (10)		Total
Commercial	$	50,034	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	50,034
Construction and development	79,100		1,706		—		—		—		—		80,806
Home equity	16,493		—		—		47		—		—		16,540
One-to-four-family	102,396		—		—		525		—		—		102,921
Multi-family	22,223		—		—		—		—		—		22,223
Total real estate loans	270,246		1,706		—		572		—		—		272,524
CONSUMER LOANS
Indirect home improvement	102,656		—		—		408		—		—		103,064
Solar	29,189		—		—		37		—		—		29,226
Marine	23,851		—		—		—		—		—		23,851
Other consumer	2,181		—		—		—		—		—		2,181
Total consumer loans	157,877		—		—		445		—		—		158,322
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS
Commercial and industrial	54,977		2,352		335		1,955		—		—		59,619
Warehouse lending	20,817		—		—		—		—		—		20,817
Total commercial business loans	75,794		2,352		335		1,955		—		—		80,436
Total loans	$	503,917	$	4,058	$	335	$	2,972	$	—	$	—	$	511,282



		23



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Troubled Debt Restructured Loans

Troubled debt restructured (“TDR”) loans are loans for which the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial condition, has granted a significant concession to the borrower that it would otherwise not consider. The loan terms which have been modified or restructured due to a borrower’s financial difficulty include but are not limited to: a reduction in the stated interest rate; an extension of the maturity at an interest rate below current market; a reduction in the face amount of the debt; a reduction in the accrued interest; or re-aging, extensions, deferrals and renewals. TDR loans are considered impaired loans and are individually evaluated for impairment. TDR loans can be classified as either accrual or non-accrual. TDR loans are classified as non-performing loans unless they have been performing in accordance with their modified terms for a period of at least six months in which case they are placed on accrual status. The Company had one TDR loan with a balance of $58,000 at June 30, 2016, which was still on accrual and included in impaired loans at June 30, 2016, and two TDR loans totaling $734,000 at December 31, 2015, of which one TDR loan with a balance of $525,000 was on non-accrual, and the remaining TDR loan of $209,000 was still on accrual. The Company had no commitments to lend additional funds on these restructured loans at June 30, 2016.

The following table summarizes TDR loan balances at the dates indicated:



	June 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
TDR loans on accrual	$	58	$	209
TDR loans on non-accrual	—		525
Total TDR loan balances	$	58	$	734

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 there were no TDR loans that were modified in the previous 12 months that subsequently defaulted in the reporting period.

NOTE 5 - SERVICING RIGHTS

Loans serviced for others are not included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage, commercial, and consumer loans serviced for others were $785.0 million and $636.1 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively and are carried at the lower of cost or market. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, mortgage, commercial, and consumer servicing rights’ (“servicing rights”) assets are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at a book value of $6.8 million and $5.8 million, respectively. The fair market value of the servicing rights’ assets was $6.8 million at both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

The following tables summarize servicing rights activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015
Beginning balance	$	6,104		$	3,670
Additions	1,219			1,117
Servicing rights amortized	(357		)	(217		)
Impairment on servicing rights	(215		)	(1		)
Ending balance	$	6,751		$	4,569



		24

Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015
Beginning balance	$	5,811		$	3,061
Additions	1,832			1,902
Servicing rights amortized	(678		)	(394		)
Impairment on servicing rights	(214		)	—
Ending balance	$	6,751		$	4,569

Fair value adjustments to mortgage, commercial, and consumer servicing rights were mainly due to market based assumptions associated with discounted cash flows, loan prepayment speeds, and changes in interest rates. A significant change in prepayments of the loans in the servicing portfolio could result in significant changes in the valuation adjustments, thus creating potential volatility in the carrying amount of servicing rights. The following provides valuation assumptions used in determining the fair value of servicing rights at the dates indicated:



	At June 30,
Key assumptions:	2016		2015
Weighted average discount rate	9.5	%	8.5	%
Conditional prepayment rate (“CPR”)	17.1	%	10.4	%
Weighted average life in years	5.0		7.2

Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value for single family mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:



				June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Aggregate portfolio principal balance				$	780,582		$	631,812
Weighted average rate of note				4.0		%	4.0		%

At June 30, 2016	Base			0.5% Adverse Rate Change			1.0% Adverse Rate Change
Conditional prepayment rate	17.1		%	27.5		%	36.8		%
Fair value MSR	$	6,747		$	5,057		$	4,137
Percentage of MSR	0.9		%	0.6		%	0.5		%

Discount rate	9.5		%	10.0		%	10.5		%
Fair value MSR	$	6,747		$	6,639		$	6,535
Percentage of MSR	0.9		%	0.9		%	0.8		%

At December 31, 2015	Base			0.5% Adverse Rate Change			1.0% Adverse Rate Change
Conditional prepayment rate	12.2		%	17.8		%	25.3		%
Fair value MSR	$	6,813		$	5,660		$	4,557
Percentage of MSR	1.1		%	0.9		%	0.7		%

Discount rate	8.5		%	9.0		%	9.5		%
Fair value MSR	$	6,813		$	6,678		$	6,548
Percentage of MSR	1.1		%	1.1		%	1.0		%



		25

Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The above tables show the sensitivity to market rate changes for the par rate coupon for a conventional one-to-four-family FNMA/FHLMC/GNMA serviced home loan. The above tables reference a 50 basis point and 100 basis point decrease in note rates.

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as the tables above demonstrate the Company’s methodology for estimating the fair value of MSR is highly sensitive to changes in key assumptions. For example, actual prepayment experience may differ and any difference may have a material effect on MSR fair value. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in these tables, the effects of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSR is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may be associated with changes in another (for example, decreases in market interest rates may provide an incentive to refinance; however, this may also indicate a slowing economy and an increase in the unemployment rate, which reduces the number of borrowers who qualify for refinancing), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Thus, any measurement of MSR fair value is limited by the conditions existing and assumptions made at a particular point in time. Those assumptions may not be appropriate if they are applied to a different point in time.

The Company recorded $461,000 and $281,000 of contractually specified servicing fees, late fees, and other ancillary fees resulting from servicing of mortgage, commercial and consumer loans for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $879,000 and $514,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The income, net of amortization, is reported in noninterest income.

NOTE 6 - DERIVATIVES

The Company regularly enters into commitments to originate and sell loans held for sale. The Company has established a hedging strategy to protect itself against the risk of loss associated with interest rate movements on loan commitments. The Company enters into contracts to sell forward To-Be-Announced (“TBA”) mortgage-backed securities. These commitments and contracts are considered derivatives but have not been designated as hedging instruments. Rather, they are accounted for as free-standing derivatives, or economic hedges, with changes in the fair value of the derivatives reported in noninterest income. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measures those instruments at fair value.

The following tables summarize the Company’s derivative instruments at the dates indicated:



	June 30, 2016
			Fair Value
	Notional		Asset		Liability
Fallout adjusted interest rate lock commitments with customers	$	75,579	$	2,058	$	—
Mandatory and best effort forward commitments with investors	24,753		—		3
Forward TBA mortgage-backed securities	105,000		—		1,003
TBA mortgage-backed securities forward sales paired off with investors	35,500		—		150



	December 31, 2015
			Fair Value
	Notional		Asset		Liability
Fallout adjusted interest rate lock commitments with customers	$	34,154	$	698	$	—
Mandatory and best effort forward commitments with investors	24,135		74		—
Forward TBA mortgage-backed securities	49,000		3		—
TBA mortgage-backed securities forward sales paired off with investors	28,500		30		—



		26

Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Changes in the fair value of the derivatives recognized in other noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income and included in gain on sale of loans was $545,000 and $417,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $983,000 and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 7 - OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

The following table presents the activity related to OREO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30,					At or For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
Beginning balance	$	320		$	—	$	—		$	—
Additions	—			—		525			—
Capitalized costs	1			—		7			—
Disposition of assets	(321		)	—		(532		)	—
Ending balance	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—

There were no OREO properties at June 30, 2016 and 2015. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded a $150,000 net gain on the disposal of OREO, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, no net gain or (loss) on disposal of OREO. There were no holding costs associated with OREO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

NOTE 8 - DEPOSITS

Deposits are summarized as follows at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30,		December 31,
	2016⁽³⁾		2015
Noninterest-bearing checking	$	145,304	$	66,676
Interest-bearing checking	54,709		34,098
Savings	50,049		30,126
Money market	232,754		159,605
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000⁽¹⁾	72,014		65,175
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 through $250,000	76,971		91,317
Certificates of deposit of $250,000 and over⁽²⁾	26,811		32,610
Escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced	7,504		5,571
Total	$	666,116	$	485,178

(1) Includes $24.8 million of brokered deposits at June 30, 2016 and $27.9 million at December 31, 2015.

(2) Time deposits that meet or exceed the FDIC insurance limit.

(3) Includes $171.3 million of deposits acquired in the Branch Purchase.

Scheduled maturities of time deposits at June 30, 2016 for future periods ending is as follows:



	At June 30, 2016
2016	$	31,128
2017	73,598
2018	49,732
2019	8,155
2020	7,697
Thereafter	5,486
Total	$	175,796



		27



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bank pledged 12 securities held at the FHLB of Des Moines with a fair value of $13.4 million to secure Washington State public deposits of $8.5 million with a $625,000 collateral requirement by the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission at June 30, 2016.

Federal Reserve regulations require that the Bank maintain reserves in the form of cash on hand and deposit balances with the Federal Reserve Bank, based on a percentage of deposits. The amounts of such balances at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $12.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and were in compliance with Federal Reserve regulations.

Interest expense by deposit category for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Interest-bearing checking	$	7	$	7	$	12	$	13
Savings and money market	254		259		500		498
Certificates of deposit	524		546		1,091		1,048
Total	$	785	$	812	$	1,603	$	1,559

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments - The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit. These

instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized on the balance sheet.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s commitments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT	June 30,		December 31,
REAL ESTATE LOANS	2016		2015
Commercial	$	—	$	1,988
Construction and development	45,963		44,109
One-to-four-family (includes held for sale)	136,624		76,013
Home equity	22,382		18,089
Multi-family	432		429
Total real estate loans	205,401		140,628
CONSUMER LOANS	8,444		5,754
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS
Commercial and industrial	30,711		39,537
Warehouse lending	40,591		27,601
Total commercial business loans	71,302		67,138
Total commitments to extend credit	$	285,147	$	213,520

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the amount of the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s



		28



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon an extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the party. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, residential real estate, and income-producing commercial properties.

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines of credit are uncollateralized and usually do not contain a specified maturity date and ultimately may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Company is committed. The Company has established reserves for estimated losses from unfunded commitments of $156,000 at June 30, 2016 and $147,000 at December 31, 2015. One-to-four-family commitments included in the table above are accounted for as fair value derivatives and do not carry an associated loss reserve.

The Company has entered into a severance agreement with its Chief Executive Officer. The severance agreement, subject to certain requirements, generally includes a lump sum payment to the Chief Executive Officer equal to 24 months of base compensation in the event his employment is involuntarily terminated, other than for cause or the executive terminates his employment with good reason, as defined in the severance agreement.

The Company has entered into change of control agreements with its Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Lending Officer, and two Executive Vice Presidents of Home Lending. The change of control agreements, subject to certain requirements, generally remain in effect until canceled by either party upon at least 24 months prior written notice. Under the change of control agreements the executive generally will be entitled to a change of control payment from the Company if the executive is involuntarily terminated within six months preceding or 12 months after a change in control (as defined in the change of control agreements). In such an event, the executives would each be entitled to receive a cash payment in an amount equal to 12 months of their then current salary, subject to certain requirements in the change of control agreements.

Because of the nature of our activities, the Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of business. From time to time, subordination liens may create litigation which requires us to defend our lien rights. In the opinion of management, liabilities arising from these claims, if any, will not have a material effect on our financial position. The Company had no material pending legal actions at June 30, 2016.

Contingent liabilities for loans held for sale - In the ordinary course of business, the Company sells loans without recourse that may have to subsequently be repurchased due to defects that occurred during the origination of the loan. The defects are categorized as documentation errors, underwriting errors, early payment defaults, breach of representation or warranty, servicing errors, and fraud. When a loan sold to an investor without recourse fails to perform according to its contractual terms, the investor will typically review the loan file to determine whether defects in the origination process occurred. If a defect is identified, the Company may be required to either repurchase the loan or indemnify the investor for losses sustained. If there are no such defects, the Company has no commitment to repurchase the loan. The Company has recorded reserves of $700,000 and $561,000 to cover loss exposure related to these guarantees for one-to-four-family loans sold into the secondary market at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, which is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

NOTE 10 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. Consequently, the fair value of the Company’s consolidated financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may either be favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed interest rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising interest rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling interest rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed interest rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising interest rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling interest rate environment. Management monitors interest rates and maturities of assets and liabilities, and attempts to minimize interest



		29



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans, and deposits, and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

Accounting guidance regarding fair value measurements defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The following definitions describe the levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 - Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Determination of Fair Market Values:

Securities - Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of investments and mortgage-backed securities are provided by a third-party pricing service. These valuations are based on market data using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available current trade, bid, and other market information, and for structured securities, cash flow, and loan performance data. The pricing processes utilize benchmark curves, benchmarking of similar securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing. Option adjusted spread models are also used to assess the impact of changes in interest rates and to develop prepayment scenarios. Transfers between the fair value hierarchy are determined through the third-party service provider which, from time to time will transfer between levels based on market conditions per the related security. All models and processes used, take into account market convention (Level 2).

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale - The fair value of loans held for sale reflects the value of commitments with investors and/or the relative price as delivered into a TBA mortgage-backed security (Level 2).

Derivative Instruments - The fair value of the interest rate lock commitments and forward sales commitments are estimated using quoted or published market prices for similar instruments, adjusted for factors such as pull-through rate assumptions based on historical information, where appropriate. TBA mortgage-backed securities are fair valued on similar contracts in active markets (Level 2) while locks and forwards with customers and investors are valued using similar contracts in the market and changes in the market interest rates (Levels 2 and 3).

Impaired Loans - Fair value adjustments to impaired collateral dependent loans are recorded to reflect partial write-downs based on the current appraised value of the collateral or internally developed models, which contain management’s assumptions (Level 3).

The following tables present securities available-for-sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	Securities Available-for-Sale
At June 30, 2016	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
U.S. agency securities	$	—	$	9,330	$	—	$	9,330
Municipal bonds	—		26,051		—		26,051
Corporate securities	—		7,572		—		7,572
U.S. Small Business Administration securities	—		6,103		—		6,103
Mortgage-backed securities	—		48,672		—		48,672
Total	$	—	$	97,728	$	—	$	97,728



		30



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



	Securities Available-for-Sale
At December 31, 2015	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
U.S. agency securities	$	—	$	6,035	$	—	$	6,035
Municipal bonds	—		18,891		—		18,891
Corporate securities	—		3,433		—		3,433
U.S. Small Business Administration securities	—		4,023		—		4,023
Mortgage-backed securities	—		22,835		—		22,835
Total	$	—	$	55,217	$	—	$	55,217

The following table presents mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
June 30, 2016	$	—	$	63,696	$	—	$	63,696
December 31, 2015	$	—	$	44,925	$	—	$	44,925

The following tables present the fair value of interest rate lock commitments with customers, individual forward sale commitments with investors, and paired off commitments with investors measured at their fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	Interest Rate Lock Commitments with Customers
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
June 30, 2016	$	—	$	—	$	2,058	$	2,058
December 31, 2015	$	—	$	—	$	698	$	698



	Individual Forward Sale Commitments with Investors
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
June 30, 2016	$	—	$	(1,003	)	$	(3	)	$	(1,006	)
December 31, 2015	$	—	$	3		$	74		$	77



	Paired Off Commitments with Investors
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
June 30, 2016	$	—	$	(150	)	$	—	$	(150	)
December 31, 2015	$	—	$	30		$	—	$	30

The following table presents impaired loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the reporting period. The amounts disclosed below represent the fair values at the time the nonrecurring fair value measurements were made, and not necessarily the fair value as of the dates reported upon.



	Impaired Loans
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
June 30, 2016	$	—	$	—	$	291	$	291
December 31, 2015	$	—	$	—	$	734	$	734



		31



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements - Shown below is the fair value of financial instruments measured under a Level 3 unobservable input on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2016 table:



Level 3 Fair Value Instrument	Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range (Weighted Average)	Weighted Average
RECURRING
Interest rate lock commitments with customers	Quoted market prices	Pull-through expectations	80% - 99%	92.8%
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	Quoted market prices	Pull-through expectations	80% - 99%	92.8%
NONRECURRING
Impaired loans	Fair value of underlying collateral	Discount applied to the obtained appraisal	0% - 18.0%	0.0%

An increase in the pull-through rate utilized in the fair value measurement of the interest rate lock commitments with customers and forward sale commitments with investors will result in positive fair value adjustments (and an increase in the fair value measurement). Conversely, a decrease in the pull-through rate will result in a negative fair value adjustment (and a decrease in the fair value measurement).

The following tables provide a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



Three Months Ended June 30,	Beginning Balance			Purchases and Issuances			Sales and Settlements			Ending Balance			Net change in fair value for gains/(losses) relating to items held at end of period
2016
Interest rate lock commitments with customers	$	1,429		$	4,513		$	(3,884	)	$	2,058		$	629
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	(28		)	(2		)	27			(3		)	25
2015
Interest rate lock commitments with customers	$	1,026		$	2,816		$	(2,908	)	$	934		$	(92	)
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	(55		)	147			18			110			165



Six Months Ended June 30,	Beginning Balance		Purchases and Issuances			Sales and Settlements			Ending Balance			Net change in fair value for gains/(losses) relating to items held at end of period
2016
Interest rate lock commitments with customers	$	698	$	8,276		$	(6,916	)	$	2,058		$	1,360
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	74		(206		)	129			(3		)	(77		)
2015
Interest rate lock commitments with customers	$	396	$	5,963		$	(5,425	)	$	934		$	538
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	12		87			11			110			98



		32



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Gains (losses) on interest rate lock commitments carried at fair value are recorded in other noninterest income. Gains (losses) on forward sale commitments with investors carried at fair value are recorded within other noninterest income.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments - The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of financial instruments disclosed in these financial statements:

Cash, and Cash Equivalents and Certificates of Deposit at Other Financial Institutions - The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximates their fair value (Level 1).

Federal Home Loan Bank stock - The par value of FHLB stock approximates its fair value (Level 2).

Accrued Interest - The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximates its fair value (Level 2).

Loans Receivable, Net - For variable rate loans that re-price frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers or similar credit quality (Level 3).

Servicing Rights - The fair value of mortgage, commercial and consumer servicing rights are estimated using net present value of expected cash flows using a third party model that incorporates assumptions used in the industry to value such rights, adjusted for factors such as weighted average prepayments speeds based on historical information, where appropriate (Level 3).

Deposits - The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity date is included at the amount payable on demand. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation on interest rates currently offered on similar certificates (Level 2).

Borrowings - The carrying amounts of advances maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. The fair values of long-term advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Bank’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements (Level 2).

Subordinated Note - The fair value of the Subordinated Note is based upon the average yield of debt issuances in the second quarter of 2016 for similarly sized issuances (Level 2).

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments - The fair value of commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the present creditworthiness of the customers. The majority of the Company’s off-balance sheet instruments consist of non-fee producing, variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair value. The fair value of loan lock commitments with customers and investors reflect an estimate of value based upon the interest rate lock date, the expected pull through percentage for the commitment, and the interest rate at year end (Levels 2 and 3).



		33



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table provides estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:



	June 30,				December 31,
	2016				2015
Financial Assets	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Level 1 inputs:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,892	$	14,892	$	24,445	$	24,445
Certificates of deposit at other financial institutions	14,010		14,010		12,421		12,421
Level 2 inputs:
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value	97,728		97,728		55,217		55,217
Loans held for sale, at fair value	63,696		63,696		44,925		44,925
FHLB stock, at cost	1,600		1,600		4,551		4,551
Accrued interest receivable	2,420		2,420		2,107		2,107
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	—		—		3		3
Paired off commitments with investors	—		—		30		30
Level 3 inputs:
Loans receivable, net	550,104		638,928		502,535		566,209
Servicing rights, held at lower of cost or fair value	6,751		6,751		5,811		6,848
Fair value interest rate locks with customers	2,058		2,058		698		698
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	—		—		74		74
Financial Liabilities
Level 2 inputs:
Deposits	666,116		672,667		485,178		494,871
Borrowings	19,670		19,754		98,769		98,739
Subordinated note	10,000		9,550		10,000		9,550
Accrued interest payable	183		183		22		22
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	1,003		1,003		—		—
Paired off commitments with investors	150		150		—		—
Level 3 inputs:
Individual forward sale commitments with investors	3		3		—		—

NOTE 11 - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

On January 1, 2012, the Company established an ESOP for eligible employees of the Company and the Bank. Employees of the Company and the Bank who have been credited with at least 1,000 hours of service during a 12-month period are eligible to participate in the ESOP.

The ESOP borrowed $2.6 million from FS Bancorp, Inc. and used those funds to acquire 259,210 shares of FS Bancorp, Inc. common stock in the open market at an average price of $10.17 per share during the second half of 2012. It is anticipated that the Bank will make contributions to the ESOP in amounts necessary to amortize the ESOP loan payable to FS Bancorp, Inc. over a period of 10 years, bearing interest at 2.30%. Intercompany expenses associated with the ESOP are eliminated in consolidation. Shares purchased by the ESOP with the loan proceeds are held in a suspense account and allocated to ESOP participants on a pro rata basis as principal and interest payments are made by the ESOP to FS Bancorp, Inc. The loan is secured by shares purchased with the loan proceeds and will be repaid by the ESOP with funds from the Bank’s discretionary contributions to the ESOP and earnings on the ESOP assets. Payments of principal and interest are due annually on December 31, the Company’s fiscal year end. On December 31, 2015, the ESOP paid the fourth annual installment of principal in the amount of $251,000, plus accrued interest of $44,000 pursuant to the ESOP loan agreement.



		34



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As shares are committed to be released from collateral, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the average daily market prices of the shares at June 30, 2016 for the prior 90 days. These shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations. The compensation expense is accrued monthly throughout the year. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of debt and accrued interest.

Compensation expense related to the ESOP was $166,000 and $137,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $326,000 and $259,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Shares held by the ESOP at June 30, 2016 were as follows (shown as actual):



	Balances
Allocated shares	102,359
Committed to be released shares	12,960
Unallocated shares	142,566
Total ESOP shares	257,885

Fair value of unallocated shares (in thousands)	$	3,577

NOTE 12 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. For earnings per share calculations, the ESOP shares committed to be released are included as outstanding shares for both basic and diluted earnings per share.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



	At or For the Three Months Ended				At or For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Numerator:	2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income (in thousands)	$	2,835	$	2,794	$	4,496	$	4,864
Denominator:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	2,887,525		2,962,302		2,920,923		2,952,223
Dilutive shares	78,506		41,677		81,789		33,104
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	2,966,031		3,003,979		3,002,712		2,985,327
Basic earnings per share	$	0.98	$	0.94	$	1.54	$	1.65
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.96	$	0.93	$	1.50	$	1.63

NOTE 13 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

In September 2013, the shareholders of FS Bancorp, Inc. approved the FS Bancorp, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”). The Plan provides for the grant of stock options and restricted stock awards.



		35



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Total share-based compensation expense for the Plan was $199,000 and $393,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $191,000 and $373,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.

Stock Options

The Plan authorizes the grant of stock options totaling 324,013 shares to Company directors and employees. Option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of FS Bancorp’s common stock at the grant date, May 8, 2014, of $16.89 per share. These option awards were granted as non-qualified stock options, having a vesting period of five years, with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date, and a contractual life of 10 years. Any unexercised stock options will expire 10 years after the grant date or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s termination of service with the Company or the Bank.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes Option pricing model that uses the following assumptions. The dividend yield is based on the current quarterly dividend in effect at the time of the grant. Historical employment data is used to estimate the forfeiture rate. The Company became a publicly held company in July 2012, therefore historical data was not available to calculate the volatility for FS Bancorp stock. Given this limitation, management utilized a proxy to determine the expected volatility of FS Bancorp’s stock. The proxy chosen was the NASDAQ Bank Index, or NASDAQ Bank (NASDAQ symbol: BANK). This index provides the volatility of the banking sector for NASDAQ traded banks. The majority of smaller banks are traded on the NASDAQ given the costs and daily interaction required with trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company utilized the comparable Treasury rate for the discount rate associated with the stock options granted. The Company elected to use Staff Accounting Bulletin 107, simplified expected term calculation for the “Share-Based Payments” method permitted by the SEC to calculate the expected term. This method uses the vesting term of an option along with the contractual term, setting the expected life at 6.5 years.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s stock option plan awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016 (shown as actual):



	Shares	Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term In Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2016	306,900	$	16.89	8.36	$	2,794,570
Granted	—	—		—	—
Less exercised	6,300	16.89		—	49,140
Forfeited or expired	—	—		—	—
Outstanding at June 30, 2016	300,600	$	16.89	7.86	$	2,543,076

Expected to vest, assuming a 0.31% annual forfeiture rate	299,507	$	16.89	7.86	$	2,533,827

Exercisable at June 30, 2016	110,400	$	16.89	7.86	$	933,984

At June 30, 2016, there was $654,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.9 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Plan authorizes the grant of restricted stock awards totaling 129,605 shares to Company directors and employees, and all but 4,500 shares were granted on May 8, 2014 at a grant date fair value of $16.89 per share. The remaining 4,500 restricted stock awards were granted January 1, 2016 at a grant date fair value of $26.00 per share. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the restricted stock. The restricted stock awards’ fair value is equal to the value on the grant date. Shares awarded as restricted stock vest ratably over a three-year period for directors and a five-year period for employees, beginning at the grant date. Any unexercised restricted



		36



Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

stock awards will expire after vesting or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s termination of service with the Company or the Bank.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s nonvested awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016 (shown as actual):



Nonvested Shares	Shares	Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share		Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2016	94,684	$	16.89	$	1,599,212
Granted	4,500	26.00		117,000
Less vested	30,421	16.89		513,811
Forfeited or expired	—	—		—
Nonvested at June 30, 2016	68,763	$	17.49	$	1,202,401

At June 30, 2016, there was $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested shares granted as restricted stock awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.5 years.

NOTE 14 - REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines of the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital adequacy guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to total average assets (as defined), and minimum ratios of Tier 1 total capital (as defined) and common equity Tier 1 (“CET 1”) capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined).

The Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below to be categorized as well capitalized. At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized under applicable regulatory requirements. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.



		37

Table of Contents

FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables compare the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 to their minimum regulatory capital requirements and well capitalized regulatory capital at those dates (dollars in thousands):



									To be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
					For Capital Adequacy Purposes
Bank Only	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes
At June 30, 2016	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Total risk-based capital
(to risk-weighted assets)	$	87,222	14.02	%	$	49,759	8.00	%	$	62,198	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital
(to risk-weighted assets)	$	79,431	12.77	%	$	37,319	6.00	%	$	49,759	8.00	%
Tier 1 leverage capital
(to average assets)	$	79,431	10.14	%	$	31,326	4.00	%	$	39,158	5.00	%
CET 1 capital
(to risk-weighted assets)	$	79,431	12.77	%	$	27,989	4.50	%	$	40,429	6.50	%

At December 31, 2015
Total risk-based capital
(to risk-weighted assets)	$	85,570	15.51	%	$	44,132	8.00	%	$	55,164	10.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital
(to risk-weighted assets)	$	78,662	14.26	%	$	33,099	6.00	%	$	44,132	8.00	%
Tier 1 leverage capital
(to average assets)	$	78,662	12.14	%	$	25,924	4.00	%	$	32,406	5.00	%
CET 1 capital
(to risk-weighted assets)	$	78,662	14.26	%	$	24,824	4.50	%	$	35,857	6.50	%

In addition to the minimum CET 1, Tier 1 and total capital ratios, the Bank will have to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET 1 capital equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions. This new capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in starting in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented in January 2019.

FS Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company subject to the capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. For a bank holding company with less than $1.0 billion in assets, the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis and the Federal Reserve expects the holding company’s subsidiary banks to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations. If FS Bancorp, Inc. was subject to regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies with $1.0 billion or more in assets, at June 30, 2016, the Company would have exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The regulatory capital ratios calculated for FS Bancorp, Inc. at June 30, 2016 were 9.1% for Tier 1 leverage-based capital, 11.5% for Tier 1 risk-based capital, 12.8% for total risk-based capital, and 11.5% for CET 1 capital ratio.



		38



Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This report may contain forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:


•	statements of our goals, intentions, and expectations;


•	statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth, and operating strategies;


•	statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and


•	estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:


•	general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are worse than expected;


•	the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets;


•	secondary market conditions and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market;


•	fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties, and fluctuations in real estate values in our market area;


•	increases in premiums for deposit insurance;


•	the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation;


•	changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our interest margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments;


•	increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;


•	our ability to execute our plans to grow our residential construction lending, our mortgage banking operations, our warehouse lending, and the geographic expansion of our indirect home improvement lending;


•	our ability to attract and retain deposits;


•	our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and expected cost savings and other benefits within the anticipated time frames or at all including in particular, our recent Branch Purchase;


•	our ability to control operating costs and expenses;


•	changes in consumer spending, borrowing, and savings habits;


•	our ability to successfully manage our growth;


•	legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business, or increase capital requirements, including the effect of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, changes in regulation policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules, including as a result of Basel III;


•	adverse changes in the securities markets;


•	changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board or the Financial Accounting Standards Board;



Table of Contents


•	costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments;


•	our ability to implement our branch expansion strategy;


•	inability of key third-party vendors to perform their obligations to us; and


•	other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technical factors affecting our operations, pricing, products, and services and other risks described elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Any of the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q and in other public statements may turn out to be wrong because of inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Forward-looking statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement included in this report or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this report might not occur and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

Overview

FS Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary bank, 1st Security Bank have been serving the Puget Sound area since 1936. Originally chartered as a credit union, previously known as Washington’s Credit Union, the credit union served various select employment groups. On April 1, 2004, the credit union converted to a Washington state-chartered mutual savings bank. On July 9, 2012, the Bank converted from mutual to stock ownership and became the wholly owned subsidiary of FS Bancorp, Inc.

The Company is relationship-driven delivering banking and financial services to local families, local and regional businesses and industry niches within distinct Puget Sound area communities, and opened one loan production office located in the Tri-Cities, Washington during the fourth quarter of 2014. On January 22, 2016, the Company completed the previously announced Branch Purchase from Bank of America, N.A. and acquired $186.4 million in deposits and $419,000 in loans based on January 22, 2016 financial information. The four branches are located in the communities of Port Angeles, Sequim, Port Townsend, and Hadlock, Washington. The Branch Purchase expanded our Puget Sound-focused retail footprint onto the Olympic Peninsula and provided an opportunity to extend our unique brand of community banking into those communities.

The Company also maintains its long-standing indirect consumer lending platform which operates throughout the West Coast. The Company emphasizes long-term relationships with families and businesses within the communities served, working with them to meet their financial needs. The Company is also actively involved in community activities and events within these market areas, which further strengthens our relationships within those markets.

The Company focuses on diversifying revenues, expanding lending channels, and growing the banking franchise. Management remains focused on building diversified revenue streams based upon credit, interest rate, and concentration risks. Our business plan remains as follows:


▪	Growing and diversifying our loan portfolio;


▪	Maintaining strong asset quality;


▪	Emphasizing lower cost core deposits to reduce the costs of funding our loan growth;


▪	Capturing our customers’ full relationship by offering a wide range of products and services by leveraging our well-established involvement in our communities and by selectively emphasizing products and services designed to meet our customers’ banking needs.

The Company is a diversified lender with a focus on the origination of indirect home improvement loans, also referred to as fixture secured loans, commercial real estate mortgage loans, home loans, commercial business loans, and second mortgage/home equity loan products. Consumer loans, in particular indirect home improvement loans to finance window replacement, gutter replacement, siding replacement, solar panels, and other improvement renovations, represent the largest portion of the loan portfolio and have traditionally been the mainstay of our lending strategy. At



Table of Contents

June 30, 2016, consumer loans represented 29.5% of the Company’s total gross loan portfolio, down slightly from 31.0% at December 31, 2015, as real estate loan originations have increased at a faster pace than consumer loan originations during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Indirect home improvement lending is dependent on the Bank’s relationships with home improvement contractors and dealers. The Company funded $17.8 million, or 1,260 loans during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, using its indirect home improvement contractor/dealer network located throughout Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California with four contractors/dealers responsible for 53.7% of the funded loans dollar volume. The Company began originating consumer indirect loans during the fourth quarter of 2012 in the State of California and since the program’s inception has originated $86.1 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company originated $11.7 million of consumer loans in California, and at June 30, 2016, the Company had $33.1 million of consumer indirect solar loans outstanding that were originated in California. Management has established a concentration limit of no more than 100% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital for loans originated in California. At June 30, 2016, the limit was $87.2 million.

The Company originates loans secured by first mortgages on one-to-four-family residences primarily in the market areas served by the Company. The Company originates one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans through referrals from real estate agents, financial planners, builders, and from existing customers. Walk-in customers are also an important source of the Company’s loan originations. The Company originated $354.4 million of one-to-four-family mortgages during the first half of 2016, of which $280.1 million were sold to investors. Of the loans sold to investors, $184.3 million were sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and/or Ginnie Mae with servicing rights retained for the purpose of developing these customer relationships. At June 30, 2016, one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans, excluding loans held for sale of $63.7 million, totaled $115.5 million, or 20.6%, of the total gross loan portfolio.

Since 2012, the Company has had an emphasis on diversifying lending products by expanding commercial real estate, commercial business and residential lending, while maintaining the current size of the consumer loan portfolio. The Company’s lending strategies are intended to take advantage of: (1) historical strength in indirect consumer lending, (2) recent market consolidation that has created new lending opportunities and the availability of experienced bankers, and (3) strength in relationship lending. Retail deposits will continue to serve as an important funding source.

The Company generally underwrites the one-to-four-family loans based on the applicant’s ability to repay. This includes employment and credit history and the appraised value of the subject property. The Company lends up to 100% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price for one-to-four-family first mortgage loans. For first mortgage loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80%, the Company generally requires either private mortgage insurance or government sponsored insurance in order to mitigate the higher risk level associated with higher loan-to-value loans. Fixed-rate loans secured by one-to-four-family residences have contractual maturities of up to 30 years and are generally fully amortizing, with payments due monthly. Adjustable-rate mortgage loans may pose different credit risks than fixed-rate loans, primarily because as interest rates increase, the borrower’s payments rise, increasing the potential for default. Properties securing the one-to-four-family loans are appraised by independent fee appraisers who are selected in accordance with industry and regulatory standards. The Company requires borrowers to obtain title and hazard insurance, and flood insurance, if necessary. Loans are generally underwritten to the secondary market guidelines with additional requirements as determined by the internal underwriting department.

The Company is significantly affected by prevailing economic conditions, as well as government policies and regulations concerning, among other things, monetary and fiscal affairs. Deposit flows are influenced by a number of factors, including interest rates paid on time deposits, other investments, account maturities, and the overall level of personal income and savings. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for funds, the number and quality of lenders, and regional economic cycles. Sources of funds for lending activities include primarily deposits, including brokered deposits, borrowings, payments on loans and income provided from operations.

The Company’s earnings are dependent upon net interest income, the difference between interest income and interest expense. Interest income is a function of the balances of loans and investments outstanding during a given period and the yield earned on these loans and investments. Interest expense is a function of the amount of deposits and borrowings outstanding during the same period and interest rates paid on these deposits and borrowings. Another significant influence on the Company's earnings is fee income from mortgage banking activities. The Company’s earnings are also affected by the provision for loan losses, service charges and fees, gains from sales of assets, operating expenses and income taxes.



Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex, or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the economy and changes in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include the following:

Allowance for Loan Loss. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to income. A high degree of judgment is necessary when determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impacted loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Management reviews the level of the allowance at least quarterly and establishes the provision for loan losses based upon an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience, current economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectability of the loan portfolio.

Although the Company believes it uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. As the Company adds new products to the loan portfolio and expands the Company’s market area, management intends to enhance and adapt our methodology to keep pace with the size and complexity of the loan portfolio. Changes in any of the above factors could have a significant effect on the calculation of the allowance for loan losses in any given period. Management believes that its systematic methodology continues to be appropriate given our size and level of complexity.

Servicing Rights. Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through the purchase or through the sale of financial assets. Generally, purchased servicing rights are capitalized at the cost to acquire the rights. For sales of mortgage, commercial and consumer loans, a portion of the cost of originating the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage, commercial, or consumer servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds, and default rates and losses.

Servicing assets are evaluated quarterly for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as a recovery and an increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are stated separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets.

Derivative and Hedging Activity. ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” requires that derivatives of the Company be recorded in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. Management considers its accounting policy for derivatives to be a critical accounting policy because these instruments have certain interest rate risk characteristics that change in value based upon changes in the capital markets. The Company’s derivatives are primarily the result of its mortgage banking activities in the form of commitments to extend credit, commitments to sell loans, TBA MBS trades and option contracts to mitigate the risk of the commitments to extend credit. Estimates of the percentage of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale that may not fund are based upon historical data and current market trends. The fair value adjustments of the derivatives are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income with offsets to other assets or other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Income Taxes. Income taxes are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements to show the tax effects of the operations and transactions reported in the consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently payable



Table of Contents

plus deferred taxes. Accounting Standards Codification, ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities result from differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. They are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled and are determined using the assets and liability method of accounting. The deferred income provision represents the difference between net deferred tax asset/liability at the beginning and end of the reported period. In formulating the deferred tax asset, the Company is required to estimate income and taxes in the jurisdiction in which the Company operates. This process involves estimating the actual current tax exposure for the reported period together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation and the provision for loan losses, for tax and financial reporting purposes.

Deferred tax liabilities occur when taxable income is less than reported income on the income statements due to accounting valuation methods that differ from tax, as well as tax rate estimates and payments made quarterly and adjusted to actual at the end of the year. Deferred tax liabilities are temporary differences payable in future periods. The Company had a net deferred tax liability of $1.7 million, and $1.3 million, at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Assets. Total assets increased $106.4 million, or 15.7%, to $783.9 million at June 30, 2016, from $677.6 million at December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of a $47.6 million, or 9.5% increase in loans receivable, net, a $42.5 million, or 77.0% increase in securities available-for-sale, an $18.8 million, or 41.8% increase in loans held for sale, partially offset by a $9.6 million, or 39.1% decrease in cash and cash equivalents, and a $3.0 million, or 64.8% decrease in FHLB stock, at cost. The increase in assets during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily funded by cash received from deposits acquired in the Branch Purchase.

Loans receivable, net increased $47.6 million, or 9.5%, to $550.1 million at June 30, 2016, from $502.5 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in loans receivable, net was primarily a result of increases in total real estate loans of $23.2 million including increases in one-to-four-family, multi-family, home equity, and commercial real estate loans, as well as increases of $13.8 million in warehouse lending, $7.4 million in consumer loans, and $4.8 million in commercial and industrial loans.

Loans held for sale, consisting of one-to-four-family loans, increased by $18.8 million, or 41.8%, to $63.7 million at June 30, 2016, from $44.9 million at December 31, 2015 due to increased loan originations and the timing difference between loan fundings and loan sale settlements. The Company continues to expand its home lending operations by hiring additional lending staff and will continue selling one-to-four-family mortgage loans into the secondary market for asset/liability management purposes. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company sold $193.4 million of one-to-four-family mortgage loans to investors, compared to sales of $185.5 million for the same quarter one year ago.

One-to-four-family originations of loans held for sale, including loans brokered to other institutions, increased $16.4 million, or 8.4% to $211.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $195.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in originations was a result of increased purchase activity associated with the seasonal home purchases in the Pacific Northwest and the continued low interest rate environment during the first half of 2016.

The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2016 was $9.0 million, or 1.6% of gross loans receivable, excluding loans held for sale, compared to $7.8 million, or 1.5% of gross loans receivable, excluding loans held for sale, at December 31, 2015. Substandard loans increased $159,000, or 5.3%, to $3.1 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $3.0 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due a commercial line of credit that was downgraded as a result of the financial performance of the borrowers. Non-performing loans, consisting of non-accruing loans, decreased $397,000, or 39.0%, to $620,000 at June 30, 2016, from $1.0 million at December 31, 2015. At June 30, 2016, non-performing loans consisted of $300,000 of indirect home improvement loans, $219,000 of home equity loans, $60,000 of commercial and industrial loans, $39,000 of one-to-four-family loans, and $2,000 of other consumer loans. Non-performing loans to total gross loans decreased to 0.1% at June 30, 2016, compared to 0.2% at December 31, 2015. The Company had



Table of Contents

no OREO at June 30, 2016 or at December 31, 2015. The Company had one TDR loan with a balance of $58,000 at June 30, 2016, which was performing in accordance with its modified terms, compared to two TDR loans totaling $734,000 at December 31, 2015, of which one TDR loan with a balance of $525,000 was on non-accrual, and the remaining TDR loan of $209,000 was performing in accordance with its modified terms at December 31, 2015.

Liabilities. Total liabilities increased $105.6 million, or 17.5%, to $707.9 million at June 30, 2016, from $602.2 million at December 31, 2015 due primarily to the Branch Purchase. Deposits increased $180.9 million, or 37.3%, to $666.1 million at June 30, 2016, from $485.2 million at December 31, 2015. Relationship-based transactional accounts (noninterest-bearing checking, interest-bearing checking, and escrow accounts) increased $101.2 million, or 95.1%, to $207.5 million at June 30, 2016, from $106.3 million at December 31, 2015. Purchased transaction accounts include $8.1 million in public funds. Money market and savings accounts increased $93.1 million, or 49.1%, to $282.8 million at June 30, 2016, from $189.7 million at December 31, 2015. Time deposits decreased $13.3 million, or 7.0%, to $175.8 million at June 30, 2016, from $189.1 million at December 31, 2015. Non-retail certificates of deposit which includes brokered certificates of deposit, online certificates of deposit, and public funds decreased $7.7 million to $38.6 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $46.3 million at December 31, 2015. Management remains focused on growth in lower cost relationship-based deposits.

At June 30, 2016, total debt was $29.5 million consisting of borrowings of $19.7 million and a subordinated note, net of $9.8 million. Borrowings decreased $79.1 million, or 80.1%, to $19.7 million at June 30, 2016, from $98.8 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to the cash received in the Branch Purchase being utilized to repay FHLB advances.

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased to $76.1 million at June 30, 2016, from $75.3 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in stockholders’ equity during the six months ended June 30, 2016, was primarily related to net income of $4.5 million, and an increase of $770,000 in other comprehensive income (representing unrealized gains in our investment portfolio), primarily offset by common stock repurchases of $4.7 million. The Company repurchased 192,000 shares of its common stock during the first half of 2016 at an average price per share of $24.78. At June 30, 2016, 133,000 shares remained available for repurchase as authorized pursuant to our July 2015 stock repurchase plan. Book value per common share was $26.73 at June 30, 2016, compared to $25.18 at December 31, 2015.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

General. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was unchanged from $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, increases in net interest income of $1.2 million, or 17.4%, and $1.3 million, or 24.2% in noninterest income primarily offset a $2.3 million, or 32.3% increase in noninterest expense as compared to the same quarter last year.

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, decreased $368,000, or 7.6%, to $4.5 million, from $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in net income was primarily a result of a $4.7 million, or 33.5% increase in noninterest expense, partially offset by a $2.8 million, or 20.9% increase in net interest income, and a $1.5 million, or 16.3% increase in noninterest income.



Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the average balances of all major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to calculate the comparison of results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:



Average Balances	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Assets	2016		2015		2016		2015
Loans receivable ⁽¹⁾	$	596,425	$	473,224	$	578,281	$	455,820
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value	90,932		46,668		78,481		45,839
Interest-bearing deposits and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions	61,949		17,371		93,694		16,970
Total interest-earning assets	749,306		537,263		750,456		518,629
Noninterest-earning assets	37,519		25,140		32,976		25,666
Total assets	$	786,825	$	562,403	$	783,432	$	544,295

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Interest-bearing accounts	$	520,423	$	388,377	$	510,325	$	379,100
Borrowings	14,840		33,886		32,917		29,548
Subordinated note	9,811		—		9,809		—
Total interest-bearing liabilities	545,074		422,263		553,051		408,648
Noninterest-bearing accounts	155,124		63,972		145,137		61,580
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities	11,982		7,623		10,804		6,702
Stockholders’ equity	74,645		68,545		74,440		67,365
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	786,825	$	562,403	$	783,432	$	544,295
(1) Includes loans held for sale

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.2 million, or 17.4%, to $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $6.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in net interest income was attributable to a $958,000, or 12.8% increase in loans receivable interest income, primarily due to an increase in the average loans receivable balance, a $355,000, or 126.3% increase in interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions, partially offset by a $112,000, or 12.7% increase in total interest expense, primarily due to the addition of the subordinated note interest expense of $169,000.

Net interest income increased $2.8 million, or 20.9%, to $15.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $13.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in net interest income was attributable to a $2.5 million, or 17.2% increase in loans receivable interest income, primarily due to an increase in the average loans receivable balance, a $668,000, or 122.6% increase in interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions, partially offset by a $373,000, or 22.0% increase in interest expense, primarily due to the addition of the subordinated note interest expense of $341,000, and a $44,000, or 2.9% increase in interest expense on deposits primarily due to the Branch Purchase.

The net interest margin (“NIM”) decreased 80 basis points to 4.34% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from 5.14% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and decreased 86 basis points to 4.26% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from 5.12% for the same period of the prior year. The decreased NIM reflects increased balances in overnight cash balances invested at the overnight Fed Funds rate, and growth in lower yielding loan and investment assets. Our strategy to increase the loan portfolio through diversified lending channels has pressured the NIM as the increase in lower yielding real estate and commercial business loans has offset the increase in higher yielding consumer loan products. As a percentage, consumer loans to total gross loans were 29.5% at June 30, 2016, compared to 34.0% at June 30, 2015. The average cost of funds decreased 16 basis points to 0.57% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from 0.73% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and a 13 basis points decrease in the cost of funds to 0.60% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from 0.73% for the same period in the prior year. The decrease primarily reflects the growth in transactional non maturity deposits acquired through the Branch Purchase and the decline in the percentage of higher cost certificates of deposit to total deposits over the last year. Management remains focused on matching deposit duration with the duration of earning assets where appropriate.



Table of Contents

Interest Income. Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2016, increased $1.3 million, or 16.9%, to $9.1 million, from $7.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase during the period was primarily attributable to the increase in the average balance of loans receivable to $596.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $473.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased 92 basis points to 4.88% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 5.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2016, increased $3.1 million, or 21.1%, to $18.0 million, from $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase during the period was primarily attributable to the increase in the average balance of loans receivable to $578.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $455.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased 96 basis points to 4.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 5.78% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $112,000, or 12.7%, to $996,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $884,000 for the same period of the prior year. The increase during the period was primarily attributable to the $122.8 million, or 29.1% increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities to $545.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, from $422.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The average cost of funds decreased 16 basis point to 0.57% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 0.73% for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The average cost of deposits decreased 25 basis points to 0.46% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 0.71% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, reflecting the significant amount of relatively low cost relationship-based transactional deposits acquired in the Branch Purchase and the decline in the percentage of higher cost certificates of deposit to total deposits over the last year.

Interest expense increased $373,000, or 22.0%, to $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $1.7 million for the same period of the prior year. The average cost of funds decreased 13 basis points to 0.60% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 0.73% for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The average cost of deposits decreased 22 basis points to 0.49% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 0.71% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was unchanged at $600,000 for both the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, net recoveries totaled $24,000, compared to net charge-offs of $78,000 during the same period last year.

The provision for loan losses was also unchanged at $1.2 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Substandard loans decreased $719,000, or 18.7%, to $3.1 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $3.9 million at June 30, 2015. The decrease from one year ago was primarily associated with one commercial real estate loan and one one-to-four-family loan whose risk grading improved as a result of the financial performance by the borrowers. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, net charge-offs totaled $34,000, compared to $363,000 during the same period last year.

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $1.3 million, or 24.2%, to $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $5.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase during the period was primarily due to an increase of $831,000 increase in gain on sale of loans, and a $393,000 increase in service charges and fee income primarily associated with the Branch Purchase and growth in the number of home loans serviced by the Bank. One-to-four-family originations of loans held for sale, including loans brokered to other institutions, increased 8.4% to $211.9 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, compared to $195.5 million for the same quarter one year ago. The increase in originations was attributed to continued low rates. Purchase production increased by $7.0 million, or 4.5% with $160.9 million in purchased loans that closed during the three months ended June 30, 2016, up from $153.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Refinances increased by $9.6 million, or 23.2%, to $51.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $41.4 million for the same period last year. The percentage of one-to-four-family mortgage loan originations for home purchases was 75.9% of second quarter originations versus 24.1% of second quarter originations for refinance activity. This compares to 78.8% of originations to purchase a home versus 21.2% to refinance a home in the second quarter of 2015.



Table of Contents

Noninterest income increased $1.5 million, or 16.3%, to $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $9.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase during the period was primarily due to an increase of $868,000 in gain on sale of loans, and a $666,000 increase in service charges and fee income primarily associated with the Branch Purchase and growth in the number of home loans serviced by the Bank.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $2.3 million, or 32.3% to $9.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in noninterest expense was primarily a result of a $1.1 million, or 27.1% increase in salaries and benefits partially attributable to the Branch Purchase, and also includes $606,000 of commissions and incentives for the loan production staff, as well as stock-based compensation associated with the equity incentive plan. Most other expense categories also increased due to the Branch Purchase including a $268,000, or 23.8% increase in operations costs, a $164,000, or 41.7% increase in data processing, a $154,000, or 33.8% increase in occupancy, and a $140,000, or 100.0% increase in amortization of the core deposit intangible. Increases not associated with the Branch Purchase include a $221,000, or 53.0% increase in loan costs, and a $214,000 increase in impairment of servicing rights, partially offset by a $150,000 gain on sale of OREO.

Noninterest expense increased $4.7 million, or 33.5% to $18.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $13.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the Branch Purchase including a $2.1 million, or 25.2% increase in salaries and benefits, a $680,000, or 32.5% increase in operations, a $288,000, or 38.3% increase in data processing, a $287,000, or 32.2% increase in occupancy, and a $199,000, or 25.2% increase in professional fees. We also incurred $389,000 in acquisition costs, and $241,000 in amortization of the core deposit intangible attributable to the Branch Purchase during the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to none of these types of expenses in the same period last year. Other increases not associated with the Branch Purchase include a $324,000, or 43.2% increase in loan costs and a $214,000 increase in impairment of servicing rights, partially offset by a $150,000 gain on sale of OREO.

The efficiency ratio, which is noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and noninterest income, weakened to 65.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 59.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and weakened to 69.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 61.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing a greater increase in noninterest expense, compared to smaller increases in noninterest income and net interest income for both periods.

Provision for Income Tax. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded a provision for income tax expense of $2.6 million. The effective tax rate for the six month period ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was 36.4% and 33.5%, respectively.

Liquidity

Management maintains a liquidity position that it believes will adequately provide funding for loan demand and deposit runoff that may occur in the normal course of business. The Company relies on a number of different sources in order to meet its potential liquidity demands. The primary sources are increases in deposit accounts, FHLB advances, purchases of Fed Funds, sale of securities available-for-sale, cash flows from loan payments, sales of one-to-four-family loans held for sale, and maturing securities.

At June 30, 2016, the Bank’s total borrowing capacity was $179.1 million with the FHLB of Des Moines, with unused borrowing capacity of $159.4 million. The FHLB borrowing limit is based on certain categories of loans, primarily real estate loans that qualify as collateral for FHLB advances. At June 30, 2016, the Bank held approximately $237.3 million in loans that qualify as collateral for FHLB advances. In addition to the availability of liquidity from the FHLB of Des Moines, the Bank maintained a short-term borrowing line with the Federal Reserve Bank, with a current limit of $82.6 million, and a combined credit limit of $40.0 million in written Fed Funds lines of credit through correspondent banking relationships at June 30, 2016. The Federal Reserve Bank borrowing limit is based on certain categories of loans, primarily consumer loans that qualify as collateral for Federal Reserve Bank line of credit. At June 30, 2016, the Bank held approximately $159.7 million in loans that qualify as collateral for the Federal Reserve Bank line of credit.



Table of Contents

At June 30, 2016, $19.7 million in FHLB advances and FHLB Fed Funds were outstanding, and no advances were outstanding against the Federal Reserve Bank line of credit, and Fed Funds lines of credit. The Bank’s Asset Liability Management Policy permits management to utilize brokered deposits up to 20% of Bank deposits or $133.6 million as of June 30, 2016. Total brokered deposits as of June 30, 2016 were $24.8 million.

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of Company management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments, such as overnight deposits and Fed Funds. On a longer-term basis, a strategy is maintained of investing in various lending products and investment securities, including U.S. Government obligations and federal agency securities. The Company uses sources of funds primarily to meet ongoing commitments, pay maturing deposits and fund withdrawals, and to fund loan commitments. At June 30, 2016, the approved outstanding loan commitments, including unused lines of credit amounted to $285.1 million. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in three months or less at June 30, 2016, totaled $11.6 million. It is management’s policy to offer deposit rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions. Based on this management strategy, the Company believes that a majority of maturing relationship deposits will remain with the Bank.

As a separate legal entity from the Bank, FS Bancorp, Inc. must provide for its own liquidity. Sources of capital and liquidity for the FS Bancorp, Inc. include distributions from the Bank and the issuance of debt or equity securities. Dividends and other capital distributions from the Bank are subject to regulatory notice. At June 30, 2016, FS Bancorp, Inc. had $1.9 million in cash to meet liquidity needs.

Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. For information regarding our commitments and off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I. Item 1 of this report.

Capital Resources

The Bank is subject to minimum capital requirements imposed by the FDIC. Based on its capital levels at June 30, 2016, the Bank exceeded these requirements as of that date. Consistent with our goals to operate a sound and profitable organization, our policy is for the Bank to maintain a well capitalized status under the capital categories of the FDIC. Based on capital levels at June 30, 2016, the Bank was considered to be well capitalized. At June 30, 2016, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements with Tier 1 leverage-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital, and common equity Tier 1 capital ratios of 10.1%, 12.8%, 14.0%, and 12.8%, respectively. For additional information regarding the Bank’s regulatory capital compliance, see the discussion included in Note 14 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I. Item 1 of this report.

For a bank holding company with less than $1 billion in consolidated assets, such as FS Bancorp, Inc., the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis and the Federal Reserve requires the holding company’s subsidiary banks to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations. If FS Bancorp, Inc. was subject to regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies with $1 billion or more in assets, at June 30, 2016, FS Bancorp, Inc. would have exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

An evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) at June 30, 2016 was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company’s senior management. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of June 30, 2016 were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed



Table of Contents

by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is: (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act) that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls may be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, the Company occasionally becomes involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any liability from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I. Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable



Table of Contents



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plan
April 1, 2016 - April 30, 2016	5,697	$	24.99	5,697	221,779
May 1, 2016 - May 31, 2016	39,996	25.11		39,996	181,783
June 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016	48,041	24.91		48,041	133,742
Total	93,734	$	25.00	93,734	133,742

On July 28, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, or 10% of the Company’s outstanding shares. The repurchase program permits shares to be repurchased in open market or private transactions, through block trades, from time to time over a 12-month period until August 31, 2016, depending on market conditions and other factors, and pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1 Articles of Incorporation of FS Bancorp, Inc. (1)

3.2 Bylaws of FS Bancorp, Inc. (2)

4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate of FS Bancorp, Inc. (1)

10.1 Severance Agreement between 1st Security Bank of Washington and Joseph C. Adams (1)

10.2 Form of Change of Control Agreement between 1st Security Bank of Washington and each of Matthew D.

Mullet and Drew B. Ness (1)

10.3 FS Bancorp, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) (3)

10.4 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 2013 Plan (3)

10.5 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2013 Plan (3)

10.6 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2013 Plan (3)

10.7 Purchase and Assumption Agreement between Bank of America, National Association and 1st Security



Table of Contents

Bank dated September 1, 2015 (4)


10.8	Subordinated Loan Agreement dated September 30, 2015 by and among Community Funding CLO, Ltd. and the Company (5)


10.9	Form of change of control agreement with Donn C. Costa and Debbie L. Steck (6)

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Statements of Income; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-177125) filed on October 3, 2011, and incorporated by reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 10, 2013 (File No. 001-35589).

(3) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192990) filed on December 20, 2013, and incorporated by reference.


(4)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2015 (File No. 001-35589).


(5)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2015 (File No. 001-35589).


(6)	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2016 (File No. 001-35589).



Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	FS BANCORP, INC.


Date: August 11, 2016	By:	/s/Joseph C. Adams
		Joseph C. Adams,
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer)

Date: August 11, 2016	By:	/s/Matthew D. Mullet
		Matthew D. Mullet
		Secretary, Treasurer and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.				Description
31.1				Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2				Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1				Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2				Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101				The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Statements of Income; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.