FUEL TECH, INC. - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ______ to ______
Commission
file number: 000-21724
FUEL
TECH, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-5657551
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
Fuel
Tech, Inc.
512
Kingsland Drive
Batavia,
IL 60510-2299
630-845-4500
(Address
and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 under
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Large
Accelerated Filer o Accelerated
Filer x
Non-accelerated
Filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
x
As
of October 20, 2006 there were outstanding 21,745,438 shares of Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Form
10-Q
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006
INDEX
Page
|
|||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006
|
1
|
||
and
December 31, 2005
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine-
|
2
|
||
Month
Periods Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine-
|
3
|
||
Month
Periods Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
4
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
|
12
|
|
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
14
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
14
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
15
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
16
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
16
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
16
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
16
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
16
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
17
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
September
30,
2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Note
B)
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
15,709
|
$
|
10,375
|
|||
Short-term
investments
|
10,000
|
6,000
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $150 and $150,
respectively
|
17,142
|
12,184
|
|||||
Inventories
|
159
|
358
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,799
|
3,043
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,051
|
1,072
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
46,860
|
33,032
|
|||||
Equipment,
net of accumulated depreciation of $9,341 and $7,900,
respectively
|
4,261
|
4,045
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
2,119
|
2,119
|
|||||
Other
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,177 and
$1,087,
respectively
|
1,176
|
1,224
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,220
|
1,579
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,111
|
1,027
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
57,747
|
$
|
43,026
|
|||
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
7,979
|
$
|
6,493
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
5,822
|
6,949
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
13,801
|
13,442
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
483
|
448
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
$
|
14,284
|
13,890
|
||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares
|
|||||||
authorized,
21,745,438 and 20,424,133 shares issued,
|
|||||||
respectively
|
217
|
204
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
100,426
|
91,559
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(57,502
|
)
|
(62,870
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
45
|
(39
|
)
|
||||
Nil
coupon perpetual loan notes
|
277
|
282
|
|||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
43,463
|
29,136
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
57,747
|
$
|
43,026
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
Three
Months Ended
September
30
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
20,173
|
$
|
12,821
|
$
|
57,053
|
$
|
36,652
|
|||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
10,042
|
6,467
|
29,210
|
18,917
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
6,106
|
4,121
|
17,569
|
11,930
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
617
|
253
|
1,467
|
913
|
|||||||||
16,765
|
10,841
|
48,246
|
31,760
|
||||||||||
Operating
income
|
3,408
|
1,980
|
8,807
|
4,892
|
|||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
254
|
(18
|
)
|
632
|
(110
|
)
|
|||||||
Income
before taxes
|
3,662
|
1,962
|
9,439
|
4,782
|
|||||||||
Income
tax (expense) benefit
|
(1,602
|
)
|
(914
|
)
|
(4,071
|
)
|
191
|
||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,060
|
$
|
1,048
|
$
|
5,368
|
$
|
4,973
|
|||||
Net
income per Common Share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.25
|
$
|
0.25
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.22
|
$
|
0.22
|
|||||
Weighted
average number of Common Shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
21,721,000
|
20,139,000
|
21,348,000
|
19,938,000
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
24,123,000
|
23,143,000
|
24,045,000
|
22,840,000
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
Nine
Months Ended
September
30
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Operating
activities
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
3,426
|
$
|
6,587
|
|||
Investing
activities
|
|||||||
Purchases
of short-term investments
|
(4,000
|
)
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of equipment and patents
|
(1,699
|
)
|
(1,884
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(5,699
|
)
|
(5,384
|
)
|
|||
Financing
activities
|
|||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
3,058
|
639
|
|||||
Income
tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
4,465
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
7,523
|
639
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate fluctuations on cash
|
84
|
(112
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
5,334
|
1,730
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
10,375
|
4,031
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
15,709
|
$
|
5,761
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FUEL
TECH, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2006
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
Note
A: Nature
of Business
Fuel
Tech, Inc., (“Fuel Tech”), is a technology company that provides advanced
engineering solutions for the optimization of combustion systems in utility
and
industrial applications. Fuel Tech, Inc., originally incorporated in 1987 under
the laws of the Netherlands Antilles as Fuel-Tech N.V., became domesticated
in
the United States on September 30, 2006, and continues as a Delaware corporation
with its corporate headquarters at 512 Kingsland Drive, Batavia Illinois
60510-2299.
Note
B: Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a
fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods covered have
been
included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 are
not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2006.
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Fuel Tech, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005.
Effective
September 30, 2006, Fuel Tech, Inc. changed its place of incorporation from
the
Netherlands Antilles to the State of Delaware in a tax-free reorganization.
In
the reorganization, each outstanding share of Fuel-Tech N.V. common stock held
by our stockholders was converted into one share of Fuel Tech, Inc. common
stock.
The
shares exchanged were all of Fuel Tech, Inc.’s issued and outstanding
shares immediately after the reorganization. The number of shares of Fuel Tech,
Inc.’s common stock outstanding immediately after the reorganization was the
same as the number of shares of Fuel-Tech N.V. common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the reorganization. In connection with this reorganization,
all option agreements and warrant rights to purchase shares of Fuel-Tech N.V.
common stock were converted into option agreements and warrant rights to
purchase shares of Fuel Tech, Inc. common stock.
In
addition to the reorganization, Fuel Tech, Inc. has adopted a tax-free plan
of
merger whereby two of Fuel Tech, Inc.’s wholly owned United States subsidiaries
will be merged with and into Fuel Tech, Inc. after the effective date of the
reorganization transaction but before December 31, 2006.
4
Note
C: Earnings
per Share Data
Basic
earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and warrants
and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. Diluted
earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. The
following table sets forth the weighted-average shares used in calculating
the
earnings per share for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2006
and 2005:
Three
Months Ended
September
30
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Basic
weighted-average shares
|
21,721,000
|
20,139,000
|
21,348,000
|
19,938,000
|
|||||||||
Conversion
of unsecured loan notes
|
46,000
|
46,000
|
46,000
|
63,000
|
|||||||||
Unexercised
options and warrants
|
2,356,000
|
2,958,000
|
2,651,000
|
2,839,000
|
|||||||||
Diluted
weighted-average shares
|
24,123,000
|
23,143,000
|
24,045,000
|
22,840,000
|
Note
D: Total
Comprehensive Income
Total
comprehensive income for Fuel Tech is comprised of net income and the impact
of
foreign currency translation as follows:
Three
Months Ended
September
30
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
2,060
|
$
|
1,048
|
$
|
5,368
|
$
|
4,973
|
|||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
10
|
6
|
84
|
(112
|
)
|
||||||||
$
|
2,070
|
$
|
1,054
|
$
|
5,452
|
$
|
4,861
|
5
Note
E: Stock-Based
Compensation
Fuel
Tech
has one stock-based employee compensation plan, referred to as the 1993
Incentive Plan (1993 Plan), under
which awards
may be granted to participants in the form of Non-Qualified Stock Options,
Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Performance Awards, Bonuses or other forms of share-based or non-share-based
awards or combinations thereof. Participants in the 1993 Plan may be Fuel Tech’s
directors, officers, employees, consultants or advisors (except consultants
or
advisors in capital-raising transactions) as the directors determine are key
to
the success of Fuel Tech’s business. The amount of shares that may be issued or
reserved for awards to participants under a 2004 amendment to the 1993 Plan
is
12.5% of outstanding shares calculated on a diluted basis. At September
30,
2006,
Fuel Tech has 1,336,000 stock options available for issuance under the 1993
Plan.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech accounted for the stock options granted under the
1993 Plan under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No.
25, “Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees” (Opinion 25) and
related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation” (Statement 123). No
stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in Fuel Tech’s historical
Statements of Income prior to January 1, 2006 as all options granted under
the
1993 Plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant.
Effective
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
FASB
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based
Payment” (Statement 123(R)) using
the
modified-prospective transition method. Under that transition method,
compensation cost recognized in the nine-month period ended September
30,
2006
includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior
to,
but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement 123, and
(b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January
1,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 123(R). Accordingly, results for prior periods have
not
been restated.
As
a
result of adopting Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech’s income
before income taxes and net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
is
$287 and $213 lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account for
share-based compensation under Opinion 25. Basic and diluted earnings per share
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 would have been $0.10 and $0.09,
respectively, if Fuel Tech had not adopted Statement 123(R), compared to
reported basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.09.
For
the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, income before income taxes and
net
income is $1,353 and $956 lower, respectively, than if it had continued to
account for share-based compensation under Opinion 25. Basic and diluted
earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 would have
been
$0.30 and $0.26, respectively, if Fuel Tech had not adopted Statement 123(R),
compared to reported basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.25 and $0.22,
respectively.
Prior
to
the adoption of Statement 123(R), Fuel Tech presented all tax benefits resulting
from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Statement
of
Cash Flows. Statement 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax
benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost
recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing
cash flows. The $4,465 excess tax benefit classified as a financing cash inflow
on the Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
would have been classified as an operating cash inflow if Fuel Tech had not
adopted Statement 123(R).
The
awards granted under the 1993 Plan have a 10-year life and they vest as follows:
50% after the second anniversary of the award date, 25% after the third
anniversary, and the final 25% after the fourth anniversary of the award date.
Fuel Tech calculates stock compensation expense based on the grant date fair
value of the award and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the
four-year service period of the award.
6
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
estimate the fair value of employee stock options for the required pro forma
disclosure under Statement 123. This model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are
fully
transferable. With the adoption of Statement 123(R) as of January 1, 2006,
Fuel
Tech has continued to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate
the
fair value of stock option grants.
The
principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology
for estimating such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate - an
estimate based on the yield of zero-coupon treasury securities with a maturity
equal to the expected life of the option; (2) expected volatility - an estimate
based on the historical volatility of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock for a period
equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected life of the option
-
an estimate based on historical experience including the effect of employee
terminations.
Based
on
the results of the model, the weighted-average fair value of the stock options
granted during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 was $8.09 per
share using the following assumptions:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.84
|
%
|
4.26
|
%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
63.5
|
%
|
48.7
|
%
|
|||
Expected
life of option
|
5.3
years
|
4.0
years
|
7
The
following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share
if
Fuel Tech had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement 123(R)
to options granted under Fuel Tech’s stock option plans in all periods
presented. For purposes of this pro forma disclosure, as noted above, the value
of the options is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model.
For
the three months ended September 30
|
For
the nine months ended September 30
|
||||||
2005
|
2005
|
||||||
Net
income as reported
|
$
|
1,048
|
$
|
4,973
|
|||
Deduct:
Total
stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based
method
for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
198
|
730
|
|||||
Pro
forma net income
|
$
|
850
|
$
|
4,243
|
|||
Basic
and diluted income per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
- as reported
|
$
|
.05
|
$
|
.25
|
|||
Basic
- pro forma
|
$
|
.04
|
$
|
.21
|
|||
Diluted
- as reported
|
$
|
.05
|
$
|
.22
|
|||
Diluted
- pro forma
|
$
|
.04
|
$
|
.19
|
Stock
option activity for Fuel Tech’s 1993 Plan for the nine months ended September
30, 2006 was as follows:
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted-
Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
on January 1, 2006
|
2,799,000
|
$
|
4.29
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
317,500
|
13.66
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
(1,123,425
|
)
|
2.74
|
$
|
12,249
|
||||||||
Expired
or forfeited
|
(143,875
|
)
|
5.94
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
on September 30, 2006
|
1,849,200
|
$
|
6.71
|
7.52
years
|
$
|
12,404
|
|||||||
Exercisable
on September 30, 2006
|
701,700
|
$
|
5.02
|
5.63
years
|
$
|
3,521
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
fair value of
|
|||||||||||||
options
granted during first nine months of 2006
|
$
|
8.09
|
8
The
weighted-average exercise price per nonvested stock award at grant date was
$13.13 per share for the nonvested stock awards granted in 2006. Nonvested
stock
award activity for all plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was
as
follows:
Nonvested
Stock Outstanding
|
||||
Outstanding
on January 1, 2006
|
1,111,625
|
|||
Granted
|
317,500
|
|||
Released
|
(142,250
|
)
|
||
Expired
or forfeited
|
(139,375
|
)
|
||
Outstanding
on September 30, 2006
|
1,147,500
|
As
of
September 30, 2006, there was $3,100 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
1993 Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four
years.
Note
F: Debt
Fuel
Tech, Inc. (FTI) had a $15,000 revolving credit facility that expired on July
31, 2006 collateralized by all personal property owned by FTI. FTI could use
this facility for cash advances and standby letters of credit. Cash advances
under this facility bore interest based on the following:
- |
The
Bank Prime Rate reduced by a range of zero to 50 basis points, or
|
- |
The
Bank Interbank Offering Rate increased by a range of 200 to 250 basis
points
|
Effective
July 31, 2006, this revolving credit facility was terminated and FTI entered
into a new agreement with a different financial institution for a revolving
credit facility expiring July 31, 2009. The facility was issued in the amount
of
$25,000, is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 75 basis
points. FTI can use this facility for cash advances and standby letters of
credit.
Note
G: Business
Segment and Geographic Disclosures
Fuel
Tech
segregates its financial results into two reportable segments representing
two
broad technology segments as follows:
-
The NOx
reduction technology segment, which includes the NOxOUT®,
NOxOUT
CASCADE®,
NOxOUT
ULTRA®
and
NOxOUT-SCR®
processes for the reduction of NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers,
incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources, and
-
The
fuel treatment chemicals technology segment, which uses chemical processes
for
the control of slagging, fouling, and corrosion and for plume abatement in
furnaces and boilers through the addition of chemicals into the fuel using
TIFI™
Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ technology.
The
“Other” classification includes those profit and loss items not allocated by
Fuel Tech to each reportable segment. Further, there are no intersegment sales
that require elimination.
Fuel
Tech
evaluates performance and allocates resources based on reviewing gross margin
by
reportable segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are
the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Fuel
Tech does not review assets by reportable segment, but rather, in aggregate
for
Fuel Tech as a whole.
9
Reporting
segment net sales and gross margin are provided below.
Three
months ended
September
30, 2006
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
11,197
|
$
|
8,976
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
20,173
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
6,270
|
3,730
|
42
|
10,042
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
4,927
|
5,246
|
(42
|
)
|
10,131
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
6,106
|
6,106
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
617
|
617
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
4,927
|
$
|
5,246
|
$
|
(6,765
|
)
|
$
|
3,408
|
Three
months ended
September
30, 2005
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
6,683
|
$
|
6,138
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
12,821
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
3,304
|
3,113
|
50
|
6,467
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
3,379
|
3,025
|
(50
|
)
|
6,354
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
4,121
|
4,121
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
253
|
253
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
3,379
|
$
|
3,025
|
$
|
(4,424
|
)
|
$
|
1,980
|
Nine
months ended
September
30, 2006
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
36,717
|
$
|
20,336
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
57,053
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
20,418
|
8,658
|
134
|
29,210
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
16,299
|
11,678
|
(134
|
)
|
27,843
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
17,569
|
17,569
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
1,467
|
1,467
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
16,299
|
$
|
11,678
|
$
|
(19,170
|
)
|
$
|
8,807
|
Nine
months ended
September
30, 2005
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
23,003
|
$
|
13,644
|
$
|
5
|
$
|
36,652
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
11,620
|
7,069
|
228
|
18,917
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
11,383
|
6,575
|
(223
|
)
|
17,735
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
11,930
|
11,930
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
913
|
913
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
11,383
|
$
|
6,575
|
$
|
(13,066
|
)
|
$
|
4,892
|
10
Information
concerning Fuel Tech’s operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues
are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. Assets are
those directly associated with operations of the geographic area.
Three
months ended
September 30 |
Nine
months ended
September 30 |
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
15,396
|
$
|
10,837
|
$
|
41,595
|
$
|
30,552
|
|||||
Foreign
|
4,777
|
1,984
|
15,458
|
6,100
|
|||||||||
$
|
20,173
|
$
|
12,821
|
$
|
57,053
|
$
|
36,652
|
||||||
September
30,
2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
54,059
|
$
|
39,006
|
|||||||||
Foreign
|
3,688
|
4,020
|
|||||||||||
$
|
57,747
|
$
|
43,026
|
Note
H: Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (FIN 48),” which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that Fuel Tech
recognize in its financial statements, the impact of a tax position, if that
position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the
technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN
48
are effective as of the beginning of Fuel Tech’s 2007 fiscal year, with the
cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an
adjustment to opening retained earnings. Fuel Tech is currently evaluating
the
impact, if any, of adopting FIN
48 on
its financial statements.
In
September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
“Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108).” SAB 108 was
issued to provide consistency between how registrants quantify financial
statement misstatements. We will initially apply SAB 108 in connection with
the
preparation of our annual financial statements for the year ending December
31,
2006. The adoption of SAB 108 will have no impact on the financial
statements.
11
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Results
of Operations
Net
sales
for the third quarter ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $20,173,000 and
$12,821,000, respectively, while net sales for the nine months ended September
30, 2006 and 2005 were $57,053,000 and $36,652,000, respectively. The 56%
year-to-date increase is due to a $13,714,000 increase in revenues derived
from
the nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction technology segment and to a $6,692,000
increase in revenues derived from the fuel treatment chemical technology
segment.
The
NOx
reduction technology segment generated revenues of $36,717,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of 60% over the prior year. This
segment continues to experience a high level of order activity as utilities
and
industrial facilities that are impacted by the Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Call regulation and other recently
introduced regulatory mandates continue to utilize Fuel Tech’s technology as an
important element of their ongoing regulatory compliance strategy. Fuel Tech
continues to work towards developing alliance agreements with selected
customers.
The
fuel
treatment chemical technology segment generated revenues of $20,336,000 for
the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of 49% over the prior year.
This segment’s growth is indicative of the continued market acceptance of Fuel
Tech’s patented TIFI™ Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ technology, particularly on
coal-fired units, which represent the largest market opportunity for the
technology, both domestically and abroad. Fuel Tech’s oil-fired business was
negatively impacted by the high price of oil in the first nine months of the
year.
Fuel
Tech’s TIFI technology alleviates the slagging and fouling issues associated
with burning coals that are high in low-melting-point ash constituents, such
as
sodium and iron. Powder River Basin (PRB) coal, which accounts for
approximately 40% of the coal burned in the United States today to generate
electricity, and Illinois Basin coal, are two examples of coal sources that
have
high levels of low-melting-point ash constituents, however, coal seams across
the country are providing utility units with slagging and fouling issues.
Additionally, demonstrations have recently been performed on utility units
that burn higher sulfur coals. High sulfur coals represent an additional
market opportunity for Fuel Tech, particularly as environmental regulations
require coal-fired utility units to install sulfur reduction technologies.
When high-sulfur coals are used on a unit that has a Selective Catalytic
Reduction (SCR) system, sulfur trioxide (SO3) and plume abatement issues are
created, which are a key concern in many utility and industrial operations
today. Fuel Tech’s TIFI Targeted In-Furnace Injection technology provides
a solution for these issues.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales for Fuel Tech for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 was 50%. The cost of sales percentage for the third
quarter for the NOx reduction business increased to 56% from 49% in the
comparable prior-year period, resulting from the mix of project business. For
the fuel treatment chemical business, the cost of sales percentage decreased
to
42% in the third quarter of 2006 from 51% in 2005. The decrease is due to the
timing of revenue recognition on cost-share demonstrations.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales for Fuel Tech for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 was 51% and 52%, respectively. The cost of sales
percentage for the NOx reduction business increased to 56% for this period
versus 51% in the comparable prior-year period, again resulting from project
mix. For the fuel treatment chemical business, the cost of sales percentage
decreased to 43% for this period versus 52% in the comparable period of the
prior year. The decrease is due to the timing of revenue recognition on
cost-share demonstrations.
12
Selling,
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30,
2006 and 2005 were $6,106,000 and $4,121,000, respectively, while these expenses
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were
$17,569,000 and $11,930,000, respectively.
The
$5,639,000 increase for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 is
attributable to the following:
- |
Fuel
Tech recorded $1,353,000 in stock compensation expense in accordance
with
Statement 123(R), as discussed in Note E
above.
|
- |
Fuel
Tech realized an increase in revenue-related expenses in the amount
of
$1,600,000 as both technology segments had significantly improved
revenue
growth versus the comparable prior-year
period.
|
- |
Fuel
Tech recorded an increase in human resource-related expenses of
approximately $1,700,000 as staffing levels were increased in several
areas in anticipation of overall business
growth.
|
- |
Finally,
Fuel Tech realized incremental expenses related to audit, tax, consulting
and recruiting fees, all in support of achieving business growth.
|
Research
and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005
were $617,000 and $253,000, respectively, while these expenses for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were
$1,467,000 and $913,000, respectively.
Fuel
Tech has established a more focused approach in the pursuit of commercial
applications for its technologies outside of its traditional markets, and in
the
development and analysis of new technologies that could represent incremental
market opportunities.
The
$742,000 increase in other income and expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 versus the comparable prior-year period is due principally
to
the benefit of an increase in interest income. The increase has been driven
by
higher average cash and short-term investment balances, and market interest
rates, than those experienced in the prior year.
For
the
three months ended September 30, 2006, Fuel Tech recorded tax expense of
$1,602,000. This amount represents deferred tax expense related to taxable
income recognized in the third quarter of 2006. For the three months ended
September 30, 2005, Fuel Tech recorded tax expense of $914,000.
On
a
year-to-date basis, Fuel Tech recorded tax expense of $4,071,000. This amount
represents deferred tax expense related to taxable income recognized in the
first nine months of 2006. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, Fuel
Tech recorded a tax benefit of $191,000. The tax benefit included a $2,200,000
reduction in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which represented
the
anticipated utilization of net operating loss carryforwards in subsequent
periods, partially offset by $1,837,000 in deferred tax expense and $172,000
in
current state income tax expense.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
At
September 30, 2006, Fuel Tech had cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments of $25,709,000 and working capital of $33,059,000 versus $16,375,000
and $19,590,000 at the end of 2005, respectively. Operating activities provided
$3,426,000 of cash during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006,
primarily due to the favorable operating results of the business segments.
Investing activities used cash of $5,699,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as short-term investments were increased by $4,000,000 while
$1,699,000 was utilized to support and enhance the operations of the business,
principally for equipment related to the fuel treatment chemical technology
segment. Fuel Tech generated cash related to the exercise of stock options
in
the amount of $7,523,000. Of this amount, $3,058,000 represents proceeds derived
from the exercise price of options exercised in the first nine months of 2006,
while $4,465,000 represents the excess tax benefits realized from the exercise
of stock options in the first nine months of 2006.
13
Forward-Looking
Statements
Statements
in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, so-called “forward-looking
statements,” are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that all
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those
detailed in Fuel Tech’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See
“Risk Factors of the Business” in Item 1, “Business,” and also Item 7,
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” in Fuel Tech’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Risk Management
Fuel
Tech’s earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. Fuel Tech does not enter into foreign currency
forward contracts or into foreign currency option contracts to manage this
risk
due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
Fuel
Tech
maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in Fuel Tech’s filings under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and forms. Fuel Tech’s management, with the participation of
its principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness
of Fuel Tech’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Fuel Tech’s principal executive
and financial officers have concluded, based on such evaluation, that such
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such
period.
There
was
no change in Fuel Tech’s internal control over financial reporting that was
identified in connection with such evaluation that occurred during the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected,
or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, Fuel Tech’s internal control over
financial reporting.
14
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
None
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
The
following risk factors have been updated from those set out in the Issuer’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 2005:
Risks
Relating to Fuel Tech’s Common Stock:
The
price of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock may fluctuate substantially, which could
negatively affect the Company and the holders of Fuel Tech’s Common
Stock.
The
price
of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock has been volatile. Since May 2, 2005, the high and
low bid quotations of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock have ranged from a low of $5.33
to a high of $21.45. The trading price of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock may continue
to be volatile in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond
the
Company’s control including, among others, negative news about other publicly
traded companies in our industry and the industries of our customers, general
economic or stock market conditions unrelated to the Company’s operating
performance, quarterly variations in the Company’s operating results, changes in
earnings estimates by analysts, and announcements of new clients or service
offerings by our competitors. In addition, the Company’s financial results may
be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. If this were
to
occur, the market price of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock could decrease, perhaps
significantly.
In
addition, the U.S. securities markets have from time to time experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been
unrelated to the operating performance of companies in these markets. Broad
market and industry factors may negatively affect the price of Fuel Tech’s
Common Stock, regardless of the Company’s operating performance. Further, if the
Company were to be the object of securities class action litigation as a result
of volatility in Fuel Tech’s Common Stock price or for other reasons, such
litigation could result in substantial costs and divert the Company’s
management's attention and resources, which could negatively affect the
Company’s financial results. In addition, if the Company decides to settle any
class action litigation against it, Fuel Tech’s decision to settle may not
necessarily be related to the merits of the claim.
15
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3. Defaults
upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item
5. Other
Information
None
Item
6. Exhibits
a. Exhibits
Exhibit
31.1 and 31.2 are filed herewith
Exhibit
32 is furnished herewith
16
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Date: November 7, 2006 | By: | /s/ John F. Norris Jr. |
John
F. Norris Jr.
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
||
Date: November 7, 2006 | By: | /s/ Vincent J. Arnone |
Vincent
J. Arnone
Chief
Financial Officer,
Sr.
Vice President and
Treasurer
|
||
17