FUEL TECH, INC. - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
file number: 001-33059
FUEL
TECH, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
20-5657551
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
Fuel
Tech, Inc.
512
Kingsland Drive
Batavia,
IL 60510-2299
630-845-4500
(Address
and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 under
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Large
Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated
Filer x Non-accelerated
Filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
x
As
of July 10, 2007 there were outstanding 22,298,647 shares of Common Stock,
par
value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Form
10-Q
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007
INDEX
Page
|
||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007
|
||
and
December 31, 2006
|
1
|
|
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six-
|
||
Month
Periods Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
|
2
|
|
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-
|
||
Month
Periods Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
|
3
|
|
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
4
|
|
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
|
|
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
11
|
|
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
13
|
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
13
|
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
14
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
14
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
14
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
14
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
15
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
15
|
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
16
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per-share data)
June
30,
2007
|
December
31,
2006 |
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Note
B)
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
32,604
|
$
|
24,405
|
|||
Short-term
investments
|
-
|
8,000
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of
$150
|
15,517
|
16,724
|
|||||
Inventories
|
210
|
203
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,866
|
4,972
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,255
|
1,916
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
54,452
|
56,220
|
|||||
Equipment,
net of accumulated depreciation of $9,977 and $8,845,
respectively
|
4,928
|
4,051
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
2,119
|
2,119
|
|||||
Other
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,261 and
$1,205,
respectively
|
1,106
|
1,156
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,858
|
885
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
1,892
|
1,229
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
66,355
|
$
|
65,660
|
|||
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
7,203
|
$
|
7,632
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
3,283
|
9,873
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
10,486
|
17,505
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,263
|
500
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
11,749
|
18,005
|
|||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 22,298,647 and
22,086,728 shares issued, respectively
|
223
|
221
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
109,068
|
103,122
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(55,051
|
)
|
(56,044
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
94
|
79
|
|||||
Nil
coupon perpetual loan notes
|
272
|
277
|
|||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
54,606
|
47,655
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
66,355
|
$
|
65,660
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share and per-share data)
Three
Months Ended
June
30
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
16,210
|
$
|
19,759
|
$
|
32,472
|
$
|
36,880
|
|||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
9,083
|
10,112
|
18,040
|
19,168
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
6,563
|
6,039
|
12,469
|
11,463
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
557
|
499
|
1,111
|
850
|
|||||||||
16,203
|
16,650
|
31,620
|
31,481
|
||||||||||
Operating
income
|
7
|
3,109
|
852
|
5,399
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
419
|
247
|
836
|
397
|
|||||||||
Other
expense
|
(30
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(71
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
|||||
Income
before taxes
|
396
|
3,355
|
1,617
|
5,777
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(114
|
)
|
(1,397
|
)
|
(543
|
)
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
282
|
$
|
1,958
|
$
|
1,074
|
$
|
3,308
|
|||||
Net
income per Common Share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
0.05
|
$
|
0.16
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
0.14
|
|||||
Weighted-average
number of Common Shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
22,220,000
|
21,697,000
|
22,164,000
|
21,158,000
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
24,679,000
|
24,230,000
|
24,666,000
|
24,004,000
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
Six
Months Ended
June
30
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Operating
activities
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
$
|
(1,062
|
)
|
$
|
(708
|
)
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|||||||
Sales
(purchases) of short-term investments
|
8,000
|
(10,200
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of equipment and patents
|
(2,028
|
)
|
(1,333
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
5,972
|
(11,533
|
)
|
||||
Financing
activities
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
785
|
2,880
|
|||||
Issuance
of deferred shares of stock
|
1,110
|
-
|
|||||
Income
tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
1,379
|
2,788
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
3,274
|
5,668
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate fluctuations on cash
|
15
|
74
|
|||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
8,199
|
(6,499
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
24,405
|
10,375
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
32,604
|
$
|
3,876
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FUEL
TECH, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2007
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share and per-share data)
Note
A: Nature
of Business
Fuel
Tech, Inc. (“Fuel Tech”) is a technology company that provides advanced
engineering solutions for the optimization of combustion systems in utility
and
industrial applications. Fuel Tech, Inc., originally incorporated in 1987 under
the laws of the Netherlands Antilles as Fuel-Tech N.V., became domesticated
in
the United States on September 30, 2006, and continues as a Delaware corporation
with its corporate headquarters at 512 Kingsland Drive, Batavia Illinois
60510-2299.
Note
B: Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a
fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods covered have
been
included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2007.
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Fuel Tech, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
Effective
September 30, 2006, Fuel Tech, Inc. changed its place of incorporation from
the
Netherlands Antilles to the State of Delaware in a tax-free reorganization.
In
the reorganization, each outstanding share of Fuel-Tech N.V. Common Stock held
by our stockholders was converted into one share of Fuel Tech, Inc. Common
Stock.
The
shares exchanged were all of Fuel Tech, Inc.’s issued and outstanding shares
immediately after the reorganization. The number of shares of Fuel Tech, Inc.’s
Common Stock outstanding immediately after the reorganization was the same
as
the number of shares of Fuel-Tech N.V. Common Stock outstanding immediately
prior to the reorganization. In connection with this reorganization, all option
agreements and warrant rights to purchase shares of Fuel-Tech N.V. Common Stock
were converted into option agreements and warrant rights to purchase shares
of
Fuel Tech, Inc. Common Stock.
In
addition to the reorganization, Fuel Tech, Inc. adopted a tax-free plan of
merger whereby two of Fuel Tech, Inc.’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries were
merged with and into Fuel Tech, Inc. on December 31, 2006.
4
Note
C: Earnings
per Share Data
Basic
earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and warrants
and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. Diluted
earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. The
following table sets forth the weighted-average shares used in calculating
the
earnings per share for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007
and
2006:
Three
Months Ended
June
30
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Basic
weighted-average shares
|
22,220
|
21,697
|
22,164
|
21,158
|
|||||||||
Conversion
of unsecured loan notes
|
45
|
46
|
45
|
46
|
|||||||||
Unexercised
options and warrants
|
2,414
|
2,487
|
2,457
|
2,800
|
|||||||||
Diluted
weighted-average shares
|
24,679
|
24,230
|
24,666
|
24,004
|
Note
D: Total
Comprehensive Income
Total
comprehensive income for Fuel Tech is comprised of net income and the impact
of
foreign currency translation as follows:
in
thousands of U.S. dollars
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30
|
|||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
282
|
$
|
1,958
|
$
|
1,074
|
$
|
3,308
|
|||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
12
|
51
|
15
|
74
|
|||||||||
$
|
294
|
$
|
2,009
|
$
|
1,089
|
$
|
3,382
|
5
Note
E: Stock-Based
Compensation
Fuel
Tech
has a stock-based employee compensation plan, referred to as the 1993 Incentive
Plan (1993 Plan), under which awards may be granted to participants in the
form
of Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation
Rights, Restricted Stock, Performance Awards, Bonuses or other forms of
share-based or non-share-based awards or combinations thereof. Participants
in
the 1993 Plan may be Fuel Tech’s directors, officers, employees, consultants or
advisors (except consultants or advisors in capital-raising transactions) as
the
directors determine are key to the success of Fuel Tech’s business. The amount
of shares that may be issued or reserved for awards to participants under a
2004
amendment to the 1993 Plan is 12.5% of outstanding shares calculated on a
diluted basis. At June 30, 2007, Fuel Tech has 975,000 stock options available
for issuance under the 1993 Plan.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech accounted for the stock options granted under the
1993 Plan under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No.
25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (Opinion 25) and related
Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock
Based Compensation” (Statement 123). No stock-based employee compensation cost
was recognized in Fuel Tech’s historical Statements of Income prior to January
1, 2006 as all options granted under the 1993 Plan had an exercise price equal
to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant.
Effective
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
FASB
Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (Statement 123(R)) using the
modified-prospective transition method. Under that transition method,
compensation cost recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2007 includes:
(a)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated
in
accordance with the original provisions of Statement 123, and (b) compensation
cost for all share based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based
on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
Statement 123(R). Accordingly, results for prior periods have not been
restated.
As
a
result of adopting Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech recorded
stock-based compensation expense of $1,780 ($1,134 after tax) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007. Fuel Tech recorded $839 ($556 after tax) in stock-based
compensation expense for the comparable period in 2006.
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2007, Fuel Tech recorded stock-based compensation
expense of $2,670 ($1,717 after tax) while for the comparable period in 2006,
Fuel Tech recorded $1,066 ($743 after tax impact) in stock-based compensation
expense.
Prior
to
the adoption of Statement 123(R), Fuel Tech presented all tax benefits resulting
from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Statement
of
Cash Flows. Statement 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax
benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost
recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing
cash flows. The $1,379 excess tax benefit classified as a financing cash inflow
on the Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 would
have
been classified as an operating cash inflow if Fuel Tech had not adopted
Statement 123(R).
The
awards granted under the 1993 Plan have a 10-year life and they vest as follows:
50% after the second anniversary of the award date, 25% after the third
anniversary, and the final 25% after the fourth anniversary of the award date.
Fuel Tech calculates stock compensation expense based on the grant date fair
value of the award and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the
four-year service period of the award.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
estimate the fair value of employee stock options for the required pro forma
disclosure under Statement 123. This model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are
fully
transferable. With the adoption of Statement 123(R) as of January 1, 2006,
Fuel
Tech has continued to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate
the
fair value of stock option grants.
The
principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology
for estimating such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate - an
estimate based on the yield of zero-coupon treasury securities with a maturity
equal to the expected life of the option; (2) expected volatility - an estimate
based on the historical volatility of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock for a period
equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected life of the option
-
an estimate based on historical experience including the effect of employee
terminations.
6
Based
on
the results of the model, the weighted-average fair value of the stock options
granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 was $14.05 per share
using the following assumptions:
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.78
|
%
|
4.90
|
%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
56.9
|
%
|
64.0
|
%
|
|||
Expected
life of option
|
5.1
years
|
5.3
years
|
Stock
option activity for Fuel Tech’s 1993 Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2007
was as follows:
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted-
Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
on January 1, 2007
|
2,414,200
|
$
|
13.02
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
116,500
|
25.80
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
(163,250
|
)
|
4.81
|
$
|
3,823
|
||||||||
Expired
or forfeited
|
(55,000
|
)
|
19.09
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
on June 30, 2007
|
2,312,450
|
$
|
14.09
|
8.03
years
|
$
|
47,557
|
|||||||
Exercisable
on June 30, 2007
|
645,450
|
$
|
7.33
|
6.08
years
|
$
|
17,643
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30,
2007
|
$
|
14.05
|
7
The
weighted-average exercise price per nonvested stock award at grant date was
$25.31 per share for the nonvested stock awards granted in 2007. Nonvested
stock
award activity for all plans for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was as
follows:
Nonvested
Stock Outstanding
|
||||
Outstanding
on January 1, 2007
|
1,702,750
|
|||
Granted
|
116,500
|
|||
Released
|
(97,250
|
)
|
||
Expired
or forfeited
|
(55,000
|
)
|
||
Outstanding
on June 30, 2007
|
1,667,000
|
As
of
June 30, 2007, there was $10.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the
1993 Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four
years.
In
addition to the 1993 Plan, Fuel Tech has a Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors (Deferred Plan). This Deferred Plan, as originally approved, provided
for deferral of director’s fees in the form of either cash with interest or as
“phantom stock” units, in either case, however, to be paid out only as cash and
not as stock at the elected time of payout. In the second quarter of 2007,
Fuel
Tech obtained stockholder approval for an amendment to the Deferred
Plan to provide that instead of phantom stock units paid out only in cash,
the
deferred stock unit compensation may be paid out in shares of Fuel Tech Common
Stock. Under the guidance of Statement 123(R), this plan modification required
that Fuel Tech account for awards under the plan for the receipt of Fuel Tech
Common Stock, as equity awards as opposed to liability awards. In the second
quarter of 2007, Fuel Tech recorded a credit of $1,110 to additional paid-in
capital representing the fair value of the stock awards granted. The stock-based
compensation related to the granted awards was not material.
Note
F: Debt
Fuel
Tech
has a $25.0 million revolving credit facility expiring July 31, 2009. The
facility is unsecured and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 75 basis
points. Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances and standby letters
of
credit. As of June 30, 2007, there were no outstanding borrowings on this
facility.
Note
G: Business
Segment and Geographic Disclosures
Fuel
Tech
segregates its financial results into two reportable segments representing
two
broad technology segments as follows:
·
The NOx reduction technology segment, which
includes the NOxOUT®,
NOxOUT
CASCADE®,
NOxOUT
ULTRA®
and
NOxOUT-SCR®
processes for the reduction of NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers,
incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources, and
·
The fuel treatment chemical technology
segment, which uses chemical processes for the control of slagging, fouling,
and
corrosion and for plume abatement in furnaces and boilers through the addition
of chemicals into the fuel using TIFI™ Targeted In-Furnace Injection™
technology.
The
“Other” classification includes those profit and loss items not allocated by
Fuel Tech to each reportable segment. Further, there are no intersegment sales
that require elimination.
Fuel
Tech
evaluates performance and allocates resources based on reviewing gross margin
by
reportable segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are
the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Fuel
Tech does not review assets by reportable segment, but rather, in aggregate
for
Fuel Tech as a whole.
8
Reporting
segment net sales and gross margin are provided below.
Three
months ended
June
30, 2007
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
7,648
|
$
|
8,562
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,210
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
4,745
|
4,304
|
34
|
9,083
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
2,903
|
4,258
|
(34
|
)
|
7,127
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
6,563
|
6,563
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
557
|
557
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
2,903
|
$
|
4,258
|
$
|
(7,154
|
)
|
$
|
7
|
Three
months ended
June
30, 2006
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
13,155
|
$
|
6,604
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
19,759
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
7,260
|
2,810
|
42
|
10,112
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
5,895
|
3,794
|
(42
|
)
|
9,647
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
6,039
|
6,039
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
499
|
499
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
5,895
|
$
|
3,794
|
$
|
(6,580
|
)
|
$
|
3,109
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2007
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
16,257
|
$
|
16,215
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
32,472
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
9,772
|
8,199
|
69
|
18,040
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
6,485
|
8,016
|
(69
|
)
|
14,432
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
12,469
|
12,469
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
1,111
|
1,111
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
6,485
|
$
|
8,016
|
$
|
(13,649
|
)
|
$
|
852
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2006
|
Nitrogen
Oxide Reduction
|
Fuel
Treatment Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Net
sales from external customers
|
$
|
25,520
|
$
|
11,360
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
36,880
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
14,148
|
4,928
|
92
|
19,168
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
11,372
|
6,432
|
(92
|
)
|
17,712
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
11,463
|
11,463
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
850
|
850
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
11,372
|
$
|
6,432
|
$
|
(12,405
|
)
|
$
|
5,399
|
Information
concerning Fuel Tech’s operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues
are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. Assets are
those directly associated with operations of the geographic area.
Three
months ended June 30
|
Six
months ended June 30
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
11,584
|
$
|
13,293
|
$
|
25,591
|
$
|
26,199
|
|||||
Foreign
|
4,626
|
6,466
|
6,881
|
10,681
|
|||||||||
$
|
16,210
|
$
|
19,759
|
$
|
32,472
|
$
|
36,880
|
|
June
30, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
|||||
Assets:
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
62,498
|
$
|
62,190
|
|||
Foreign
|
3,857
|
3,470
|
|||||
$
|
66,355
|
$
|
65,660
|
9
Note
H: Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation
No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109,” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a
company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on
a tax
return. On January 17, 2007, the FASB affirmed its previous decision to make
FIN
48 effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Accordingly,
Fuel Tech adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
Previously,
Fuel Tech had accounted for tax contingencies in accordance with Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards 5, Accounting
for Contingencies.
As
required by FIN 48, which clarifies Statement 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes,
Fuel
Tech recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after
determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain
the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the
more-likely-than-not threshold,
the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that
has a greater than 50 % likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement
with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, Fuel Tech applied FIN
48
to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remained open. As
a
result of the implementation of FIN 48, Fuel Tech recognized an increase of
approximately $86,000 in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, of which
$81,000 was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of
retained earnings.
The
amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 was $783,000. This
amount includes $741,000 of unrecognized tax benefits which, if ultimately
recognized, will reduce Fuel Tech’s annual effective tax rate. There have been
no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits since January 1,
2007.
Fuel
Tech
is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states
and foreign jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject
to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require
significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, Fuel Tech is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations
by
tax authorities for the years before 2003.
Fuel
Tech
recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits
in income tax expense for all periods presented. Fuel Tech had accrued
approximately $39,000 for the payment of interest and penalties at January
1,
2007. Subsequent changes to accrued interest and penalties have not been
significant.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements” (FAS No. 157). FAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS No. 157
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, and accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements.
FAS No. 157 is effective for Fuel Tech beginning January 1, 2008. Fuel Tech
is
currently reviewing the provisions of FAS No. 157, but does not expect the
provisions to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, “The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (FAS No. 159). FAS
No. 159 provides the option to report certain financial assets and liabilities
at fair value, with the intent to mitigate volatility in financial reporting
that can occur when related assets and liabilities are recorded on different
bases. This statement is effective for Fuel Tech beginning January 1, 2008.
Fuel
Tech does not expect FAS No. 159 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In
May
2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 48-1 (FSP FIN 48-1) that amends
FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. FSP
FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how an enterprise should determine whether a
tax
position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously
unrecognized tax benefits. Fuel Tech is currently reviewing the provisions
of
FSP FIN 48-1 and has not reached a conclusion as to whether the provisions
of
this FSP will have a material impact on Fuel Tech’s financial
statements.
10
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Results
of Operations
Net
sales
for the second quarter ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $16,210,000 and
$19,759,000, respectively, while net sales for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 were $32,472,000 and $36,880,000, respectively. The 12% decline
for the first half versus the prior year is due to a $9,263,000 reduction in
revenues derived from the nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction technology segment,
which was partially offset by a $4,855,000 million increase in revenues derived
from the fuel treatment chemical technology segment.
The
NOx
reduction technology segment generated revenues of $16,257,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2007, a reduction of $9,263,000 from the prior year in
part due to timing on the receipt of new NOx reduction orders domestically
and
in part due to the winding down of two NOx reduction projects in the People’s
Republic of China, which were signed in 2005 and contributed significantly
to
revenues in 2006. While revenues are down from the prior year for the second
quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007, this segment is positioned well
to
capitalize on the next phase of increasingly stringent U.S. air quality
standards, and interest in Fuel Tech’s retrofittable suite of technologies, both
domestically and abroad, has never been greater. With the compliance for the
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Call
regulation beginning to wind down, utilities and industrial facilities across
the country are planning for compliance with the Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) and the Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR), which take effect in 2009
and
2013, respectively. Thousands of utility and industrial boilers will be impacted
by these regulations and Fuel Tech’s technologies will serve as an important
element in enabling utility and industrial boiler unit owners to attain
compliance.
The
fuel
treatment chemical technology segment generated revenues of $16,215,000 for
the
six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $4,855,000, or 43%, over the
prior year. This segment’s growth during the second quarter and first half of
2007 is indicative of the continued market acceptance of Fuel Tech’s patented
TIFI™ Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ technology, particularly on coal-fired
units, which represent the largest market opportunity for the technology, both
domestically and abroad. Thus far in 2007, Fuel Tech has added seven new
coal-fired units to its customer base.
The
FUEL
CHEM®
technology segment revolves around the unique application of specialty chemicals
to improve the efficiency, reliability and environmental status of plants
operating in the electric utility, industrial, pulp and paper, and
waste-to-energy markets. FUEL CHEM programs are currently in place on nearly
60
combustion units, treating a wide variety of solid and liquid fuels, including
coal, heavy oil, biomass and municipal waste.
Central
to the FUEL CHEM approach is the introduction of chemical reagents, such as
magnesium hydroxide, to combustion units via in-body fuel application
(pre-combustion) or via direct injection (post-combustion) utilizing Fuel Tech’s
proprietary TIFI technology. By attacking performance-hindering problems, such
as slagging, fouling, corrosion, opacity, acid plume and loss on ignition (LOI),
as well as the formation of sulfur trioxide (SO3),
ammonium bisulfate (ABS), particulate matter (PM2.5),
carbon
dioxide (CO2)
and
NOx, Fuel Tech’s programs offer numerous operational, financial and
environmental benefits to owners of boilers, furnaces and other combustion
units.
A
principal market for this product line is the electric power plant that
burns coal with slag-forming constituents such as sodium and iron. Sodium
is typically found in the Powder River Basin coals of Wyoming and Montana,
while
iron is typically found in coals produced in the Illinois Basin (IB) region.
In
addition, higher sulfur content is typical of IB coals and certain Appalachian
coals and these can give rise to unacceptable levels of SO3
formation in plants with Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems and flue
gas desulfurization units (scrubbers).
The
combination of slagging coals and SO3-related
issues, such as “blue plume” formation, air pre-heater fouling and corrosion,
SCR fouling and the proclivity to suppress certain mercury removal processes,
represents attractive market potential for Fuel Tech. In addition, the
documented efficiency gains, and thus CO2
reductions, from our Fuel Chem programs on client power plants, are likely
to
expand our market potential domestically and internationally as CO2
emission
constraints are implemented.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales for Fuel Tech for the second quarter ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006 was 56% and 51%, respectively. The cost of sales
percentage for the second quarter for the NOx reduction business increased
to
62% from 55% in the comparable prior-year period, resulting from the mix of
project business. For the fuel treatment chemical business, the cost of sales
percentage increased to 50% in the second quarter of 2007 from 43% in 2006.
The
increase is due to startup costs related to the incremental units noted above,
without the realization of related revenues as only two of the seven new units
contributed revenues during the first half of the year.
11
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales for Fuel Tech for the six months ended June
30, 2007 and 2006 was 56% and 52%, respectively. The cost of sales percentage
for the NOx reduction business increased to 60% from 55% in the comparable
prior-year period, again resulting from the mix of project business. For the
fuel treatment chemical business, the cost of sales percentage increased to
51%
for this period from 43% in 2006. The increase is due to the startup costs
noted
previously and to employee-related expenditures made in anticipation of the
growth of the fuel treatment chemical business.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (S,G&A) for the quarter ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 were $6,563,000 and $6,039,000, respectively, while these expenses
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were
$12,469,000 and $11,463,000, respectively. The
$1,006,000 increase in S,G&A for the six months was due to the recording of
$2,670,000 in stock compensation expense in accordance with Statement 123(R),
as
discussed in Note E above. This amount was an increase of $1,604,000 over the
prior year. This increase in stock compensation expense is attributable to
the
awarding of stock options to all Fuel Tech employees in December 2006 and to
an
increase in the fair value of the options granted, which is being driven by
an
increase in the price of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock. When excluding the impact of
the stock compensation expense, the remaining favorable variance in selling,
general and administrative expenses of $598,000 is due predominantly to timing
on revenue-related expenses.
Research
and development expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were
$557,000 and $499,000, respectively, while these expenses for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were
$1,111,000 and $850,000, respectively.
Fuel
Tech has established a more focused approach in the pursuit of commercial
applications for its technologies outside of its traditional markets, and in
the
development and analysis of new technologies that could represent incremental
market opportunities.
The
$439,000 increase in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2007
is
driven
by
higher average cash and short-term investment balances versus those experienced
in the prior year.
For
the
quarter ended ended June 30, 2007, Fuel Tech recorded tax expense of $114,000.
This amount represents deferred tax expense related to taxable income recognized
in the second quarter of 2007. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, Fuel
Tech recorded tax expense of $1,397,000.
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2007, Fuel Tech recorded tax expense of $543,000.
This
amount represents deferred tax expense related to taxable income recognized
in
the six months ended June 30, 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2006,
Fuel
Tech recorded tax expense of $2,469,000.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
At
June
30, 2007, Fuel Tech had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
of
$32,604,000 and working capital of $43,966,000 versus $32,405,000 and
$38,715,000 at the end of 2006, respectively. Operating activities used
$1,062,000 of cash during the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, primarily
due to the change in working capital from year end. Investing activities
generated cash of $5,972,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as the
decrease in short-term investments provided cash of $8,000,000, of which
$2,028,000 was utilized to support and enhance the operations of the business,
principally for equipment related to the fuel treatment chemical technology
segment. Fuel Tech generated cash related to the exercise of stock options
in
the amount of $2,164,000. Of this amount, $785,000 represents proceeds derived
from the exercise price of options exercised in the first six months of 2007,
while $1,379,000 represents the excess tax benefits realized from the exercise
of stock options in the first six months of 2007. Lastly, $1,110,000 in cash
was
provided by the issuance of directors’ deferred shares of stock.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Statements
in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, so-called “forward-looking
statements,” are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that all
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those
detailed in Fuel Tech’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See
“Risk Factors of the Business” in Item 1A, and also Item 7, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in
Fuel Tech’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
12
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Risk Management
Fuel
Tech’s earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. Fuel Tech does not enter into foreign currency
forward contracts or into foreign currency option contracts to manage this
risk
due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
Fuel
Tech
maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in Fuel Tech’s filings under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and forms. Fuel Tech’s management, with the participation of
its principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness
of Fuel Tech’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Fuel Tech’s principal executive
and financial officers have concluded, based on such evaluation, that such
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such
period.
There
was
no change in Fuel Tech’s internal control over financial reporting that was
identified in connection with such evaluation that occurred during the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected,
or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, Fuel Tech’s internal control over
financial reporting.
13
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
None
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
None
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3. Defaults
upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
Fuel
Tech, Inc. annual meeting was held on May 23, 2007, with the following certified
results.
·
That
there were 22,163,448 shares of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock, issued and
outstanding, at the close of business on March 27, 2007, the record date
for the
annual meeting, with each share being entitled to one vote.
·
That
present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, were the holders of
19,073,614 shares of Common Stock.
·
That the
votes of the stockholders by proxy or by ballot for the election of directors
of
Fuel Tech were received, that the votes cast were canvassed, and that the
results of the votes were that the following persons received the number
of
votes as set forth below.
Director
|
For
|
Withhold
|
|||||
Douglas
G. Bailey
|
17,805,858
|
1,267,756
|
|||||
Ralph
E. Bailey
|
18,563,071
|
510,543
|
|||||
Miguel
Espinosa
|
18,873,969
|
199,645
|
|||||
Charles
W. Grinnell
|
18,572,526
|
501,088
|
|||||
Thomas
L. Jones
|
18,870,474
|
203,140
|
|||||
Samer
S. Khanachet
|
18,869,732
|
203,882
|
|||||
John
D. Morrow
|
18,868,077
|
205,537
|
|||||
John
F. Norris Jr.
|
18,718,651
|
354,963
|
|||||
Thomas
S. Shaw, Jr.
|
18,107,466
|
966,148
|
14
·
That the votes of the stockholders by proxy
or by ballot to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as Fuel Tech’s
independent registered public accounting firm for the year 2007 were received,
that the votes cast were canvassed, and that the results of the votes are as
set
forth below.
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|||||
18,071,886
|
28,839
|
972,889
|
· That
the votes of the stockholders by
proxy or by ballot to approve the adoption of Fuel Tech’s Deferred Compensation
Plan for Directors were received, that the votes cast were canvassed, and that
the results of the votes are as set forth below.
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|||||
12,458,332
|
286,604
|
1,019,403
|
Item
5. Other
Information
None
Item
6. Exhibits
a. Exhibits
Exhibit
31.1 and 31.2 are filed herewith
Exhibit
32 is furnished herewith
15
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Date: August 6, 2007 | By: | /s/ John F. Norris Jr. |
John
F. Norris Jr.
Director,
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Date: August 6, 2007 | By: | /s/ Vincent J. Arnone |
Vincent
J. Arnone
Chief
Financial Officer,
Sr.
Vice President and Treasurer
|
16