FUEL TECH, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ______ to ______
Commission
file number: 001-33059
FUEL
TECH, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-5657551
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
Fuel Tech, Inc.
27601 Bella Vista Parkway
Warrenville, IL
60555
630-845-4500
(Address
and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in rule 12b-2 under
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Large
Accelerated Filer ¨
Accelerated
Filer x
Non-accelerated
Filer ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
¨ No
x
As
of July 21, 2008, there were outstanding 23,971,622 shares of Common Stock,
par
value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Form
10-Q
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
INDEX
Page
|
||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
1
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six- Month Periods
Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
2
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six- Month Periods
Ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
3
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
4
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
14
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
14
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
15
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
15
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
15
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
15
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
15
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
16
|
SIGNATURES
|
17
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per-share data)
June 30,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Note B)
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
28,959
|
$
|
30,473
|
|||
Short-term
investments
|
-
|
1,998
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $87 and
$150
|
25,929
|
31,856
|
|||||
Inventories
|
667
|
186
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
666
|
1,589
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,766
|
1,761
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
58,987
|
67,863
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $11,340 and $10,091,
respectively
|
17,538
|
11,302
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
2,119
|
2,119
|
|||||
Other
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $1,385 and
$1,320,
respectively
|
1,345
|
1,088
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,577
|
2,552
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,847
|
2,290
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
86,413
|
$
|
87,214
|
|||
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Short-term
debt
|
$
|
2,183
|
$
|
2,051
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
9,648
|
13,632
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
3,956
|
7,037
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
15,787
|
22,720
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
1,326
|
1,255
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
17,113
|
23,975
|
|||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 23,971,622 and
22,410,064 shares issued, respectively
|
239
|
224
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
115,316
|
111,459
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(46,802
|
)
|
(48,882
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
275
|
166
|
|||||
Nil
coupon perpetual loan notes
|
272
|
272
|
|||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
69,300
|
63,239
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
86,413
|
$
|
87,214
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share and per-share data)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
18,791
|
$
|
16,210
|
$
|
39,258
|
$
|
32,472
|
|||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
9,833
|
9,083
|
20,502
|
18,040
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
7,413
|
6,563
|
14,392
|
12,469
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
909
|
557
|
1,464
|
1,111
|
|||||||||
18,155
|
16,203
|
36,358
|
31,620
|
||||||||||
Operating
income
|
636
|
7
|
2,900
|
852
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(16
|
)
|
-
|
(62
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
189
|
419
|
465
|
836
|
|||||||||
Other
(expense) income
|
(52
|
)
|
(30
|
)
|
84
|
(71
|
)
|
||||||
Income
before taxes
|
757
|
396
|
3,387
|
1,617
|
|||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(310
|
)
|
(114
|
)
|
(1,307
|
)
|
(543
|
)
|
|||||
Net
income
|
$
|
447
|
$
|
282
|
$
|
2,080
|
$
|
1,074
|
|||||
Net
income per Common Share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.02
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.09
|
$
|
0.05
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.02
|
$
|
0.01
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
0.04
|
|||||
Weighted-average
number of Common Shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
23,951,000
|
22,220,000
|
23,186,000
|
22,164,000
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
24,698,000
|
24,679,000
|
24,589,000
|
24,666,000
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FUEL
TECH, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Operating
activities
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$
|
3,307
|
$
|
(1,062
|
)
|
||
Investing
activities
|
|||||||
Sales
of short-term investments
|
1,998
|
8,000
|
|||||
Purchases
of property, equipment and intangible assets
|
(7,819
|
)
|
(2,028
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(5,821
|
)
|
5,972
|
||||
Financing
activities
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from short-term borrowings
|
132
|
-
|
|||||
Issuance
of deferred shares
|
36
|
1,110
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options and warrants
|
331
|
785
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefit for stock-based compensation
|
392
|
1,379
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
891
|
3,274
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate fluctuations on cash
|
109
|
15
|
|||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,514
|
)
|
8,199
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
30,473
|
24,405
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
28,959
|
$
|
32,604
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FUEL
TECH, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share and per-share data)
Note
A: Nature
of Business
Fuel
Tech, Inc. (“Fuel Tech”) is a fully integrated company that uses a suite of
advanced technologies to provide boiler optimization, efficiency improvement
and
air pollution reduction and control solutions to utility and industrial
customers worldwide. Fuel Tech, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its
corporate headquarters at 27601 Bella Vista Parkway, Warrenville, Illinois
60555.
Note
B: Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim
financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a
fair presentation of the balance sheet and results of operations for the periods
covered have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June
30,
2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the
year ending December 31, 2008.
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Fuel Tech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
Note
C: Revenue
Recognition Policy
Revenues
from the sales of chemical products are recorded when title transfers, either
at
the point of shipment or at the point of destination, depending on the contract
with the customer.
Fuel
Tech
uses the percentage of completion method of accounting for certain long-term
equipment construction and license contracts. Under the percentage of completion
method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on
the
relationship between actual construction costs incurred and total estimated
costs at completion. Sales and gross profit are adjusted for revisions in
completion estimates and contract values in the period in which the facts giving
rise to the revisions become known.
Accounts
receivable includes unbilled receivables, representing costs and estimated
earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts under the percentage
of
completion method. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, unbilled receivables
were approximately $10,626 and $16,813, respectively.
4
Note
D: Earnings
per Share Data
Basic
earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and warrants
and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. Diluted
earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. The
following table sets forth the weighted-average shares used in calculating
the
earnings per share for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008
and 2007:
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Basic
weighted-average shares
|
23,951
|
22,220
|
23,186
|
22,164
|
|||||||||
Conversion
of unsecured loan notes
|
45
|
45
|
45
|
45
|
|||||||||
Unexercised
options and warrants
|
702
|
2,414
|
1,358
|
2,457
|
|||||||||
Diluted
weighted-average shares
|
24,698
|
24,679
|
24,589
|
24,666
|
Note
E: Total
Comprehensive Income
Total
comprehensive income for Fuel Tech is comprised of net income and the impact
of
foreign currency translation as follows:
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
447
|
$
|
282
|
$
|
2,080
|
$
|
1,074
|
|||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
18
|
12
|
109
|
15
|
|||||||||
$
|
465
|
$
|
294
|
$
|
2,189
|
$
|
1,089
|
5
Note
F: Stock-Based
Compensation
Fuel
Tech
has a stock-based employee compensation plan, referred to as the Fuel Tech,
Inc.
Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan), under which awards may be granted to
participants in the form of Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock
Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Performance Awards,
Bonuses or other forms of share-based or non-share-based awards or combinations
thereof. Participants in the Incentive Plan may be Fuel Tech’s directors,
officers, employees, consultants or advisors (except consultants or advisors
in
capital-raising transactions) as the directors determine are key to the success
of Fuel Tech’s business. The amount of shares that may be issued or reserved for
awards to participants under a 2004 amendment to the Incentive Plan is 12.5%
of
outstanding shares calculated on a diluted basis. At June 30, 2008, Fuel Tech
has 385,000 stock options available for issuance under the Incentive
Plan.
As
a
result of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R –
Share-Based Payment (Statement 123(R)) using the modified-prospective transition
method, Fuel Tech recorded stock-based compensation expense for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 of $2,011 and $3,113, respectively. Fuel
Tech recorded $1,780 and $2,670 in stock-based compensation expense for the
comparable periods in 2007.
The
awards granted under the Incentive Plan have a 10-year life and they vest as
follows: 50% after the second anniversary of the award date, 25% after the
third
anniversary, and the final 25% after the fourth anniversary of the award date.
Fuel Tech calculates stock compensation expense based on the grant date fair
value of the award and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the
four-year service period of the award.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, Fuel Tech used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to
estimate the fair value of employee stock options for the required pro forma
disclosure under Statement 123. This model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are
fully
transferable. With the adoption of Statement 123(R) as of January 1, 2006,
Fuel
Tech has continued to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate
the
fair value of stock option grants.
The
principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology
for estimating such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate – an
estimate based on the yield of zero–coupon treasury securities with a maturity
equal to the expected life of the option; (2) expected volatility – an estimate
based on the historical volatility of Fuel Tech’s Common Stock for a period
equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected life of the option
–
an estimate based on historical experience including the effect of employee
terminations.
6
Based
on
the results of the model, the weighted-average fair value of the stock options
granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was $10.20 per share
using the following assumptions:
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.97
|
%
|
4.78
|
%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
58.4
|
%
|
56.9
|
%
|
|||
Expected
life of option
|
5.2
years
|
5.1
years
|
Stock
option activity for Fuel Tech’s Incentive Plan for the six months ended June 30,
2008 was as follows:
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding on January 1, 2008
|
2,464,325
|
$
|
15.03
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
626,500
|
19.16
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
|
(75,625
|
)
|
4.38
|
$
|
1,224
|
||||||||
Expired
or forfeited
|
(31,250
|
)
|
24.04
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
on June 30, 2008
|
2,983,950
|
$
|
16.07
|
7.81
years
|
$
|
15,157
|
|||||||
Exercisable
on June 30, 2008
|
1,063,825
|
$
|
8.84
|
6.27
years
|
$
|
11,039
|
|||||||
Weighted-average
fair value of options granted during first six months of
2008
|
$
|
10.20
|
The
weighted-average exercise price per nonvested stock award at grant date was
$18.69 per share for the nonvested stock awards granted in 2008. Nonvested
stock
award activity for all plans for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was as
follows:
Nonvested Stock
Outstanding
|
||||
Outstanding
on January 1, 2008
|
1,508,500
|
|||
Granted
|
626,500
|
|||
Released
|
(183,625
|
)
|
||
Expired
or forfeited
|
(31,250
|
)
|
||
Outstanding
on June 30, 2008
|
1,920,125
|
As
of
June 30, 2008, there was $13,376 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive
Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of four
years.
In
addition to the Incentive Plan, Fuel Tech has a Deferred Compensation Plan
for
Directors (Deferred Plan). This Deferred Plan, as originally approved, provided
for deferral of directors’ fees in the form of either cash with interest or as
“phantom stock” units, in either case, however, to be paid out only as cash and
not as stock at the elected time of payout. In the second quarter of 2007,
Fuel
Tech obtained shareholder approval for an amendment to the Deferred Plan to
provide that instead of phantom stock units paid out only in cash, the deferred
stock unit compensation may be paid out in shares of Fuel Tech Common Stock.
Under the guidance of Statement 123(R), this plan modification required that
Fuel Tech account for awards under the plan for the receipt of Fuel Tech Common
Stock as equity awards as opposed to liability awards, and compensation expense
was recorded to address the required change in accounting. In the first half
of
2008, Fuel Tech recorded stock-based compensation expense of $36 with a credit
of the same amount to additional paid-in capital representing the fair value
of
the stock awards granted.
7
At
December 31, 2007, Fuel Tech had outstanding 1,601,043 warrants to purchase
Fuel
Tech Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share, and with an
expiration date of April 30, 2008. At June 30, 2008, there are no longer any
warrants outstanding as all of them were converted to Fuel Tech Common Stock
prior to their expiration date.
Note
G: Debt
Fuel
Tech
has a $25,000 revolving credit facility expiring July 31, 2009. The facility
is
unsecured and bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 75 basis points. Fuel
Tech
can use this facility for cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of
June 30, 2008, there were no outstanding borrowings on this facility.
Beijing
Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility for RMB
35
million (approximately $5,000), which expires on July 31, 2009. The facility
is
unsecured and bears interest at a rate of 90% of the People’s Bank of China
(PBOC) Base Rate. Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances
and
bank guarantees. As of June 30, 2008, Beijing Fuel Tech had borrowings
outstanding in the amount of $2,183, which bear interest at 5.8%. At December
31, 2007, the borrowings outstanding were $2,051.
Note
H: Business
Segment and Geographic Disclosures
Fuel
Tech
segregates its financial results into two reportable segments representing
two
broad technology segments as follows:
-
The NOx
reduction technology segment, which includes the NOxOUT®,
NOxOUT
CASCADE®,
NOxOUT
ULTRA®
and
NOxOUT-SCR®
processes for the reduction of NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers,
incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources; and
-
The
fuel treatment chemical technology segment, which uses chemical processes for
the control of slagging, fouling, and corrosion and for plume abatement in
furnaces and boilers through the addition of chemicals into the fuel using
TIFI™
Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ technology.
The
“Other” classification includes those profit and loss items not allocated by
Fuel Tech to each reportable segment. Further, there are no intersegment
revenues that require elimination.
Fuel
Tech
evaluates performance and allocates resources based on reviewing gross margin
by
reportable segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are
the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Fuel
Tech does not review assets by reportable segment, but rather, in aggregate
for
Fuel Tech as a whole.
8
Reporting
segment revenues and gross margin are provided below.
Three months ended
June 30, 2008
|
Nitrogen Oxide
Reduction
|
Fuel Treatment
Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$
|
10,477
|
$
|
8,314
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
18,791
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
5,658
|
4,174
|
1
|
9,833
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
4,819
|
4,140
|
(1
|
)
|
8,958
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
7,413
|
7,413
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
909
|
909
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
4,819
|
$
|
4,140
|
$
|
(8,323
|
)
|
$
|
636
|
Three months ended
June 30, 2007
|
Nitrogen Oxide
Reduction
|
Fuel Treatment
Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$
|
7,648
|
$
|
8,562
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
16,210
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
4,745
|
4,304
|
34
|
9,083
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
2,903
|
4,258
|
(34
|
)
|
7,127
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
6,563
|
6,563
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
557
|
557
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
2,903
|
$
|
4,258
|
$
|
(7,154
|
)
|
$
|
7
|
Six months ended
June 30, 2008
|
Nitrogen Oxide
Reduction
|
Fuel Treatment
Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$
|
22,146
|
$
|
17,112
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
39,258
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
11,803
|
8,698
|
1
|
20,502
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
10,343
|
8,414
|
(1
|
)
|
18,756
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
14,392
|
14,392
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
1,464
|
1,464
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
10,343
|
$
|
8,414
|
$
|
(15,857
|
)
|
$
|
2,900
|
Six months ended
June 30, 2007
|
Nitrogen Oxide
Reduction
|
Fuel Treatment
Chemical
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Revenues from external customers
|
$
|
16,257
|
$
|
16,215
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
32,472
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
9,772
|
8,199
|
69
|
18,040
|
|||||||||
Gross
margin
|
6,485
|
8,016
|
(69
|
)
|
14,432
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
-
|
-
|
12,469
|
12,469
|
|||||||||
Research
and development
|
-
|
-
|
1,111
|
1,111
|
|||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
6,485
|
$
|
8,016
|
$
|
(13,649
|
)
|
$
|
852
|
Information
concerning Fuel Tech’s operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues
are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. Assets are
those directly associated with operations of the geographic area.
Three months ended June 30,
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
16,442
|
$
|
11,584
|
$
|
35,526
|
$
|
25,591
|
|||||
Foreign
|
2,349
|
4,626
|
3,732
|
6,881
|
|||||||||
$
|
18,791
|
$
|
16,210
|
$
|
39,258
|
$
|
32,472
|
June 30,
2008
|
December 31,
2007
|
||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
79,254
|
$
|
79,132
|
|||
Foreign
|
7,159
|
8,082
|
|||||
$
|
86,413
|
$
|
87,214
|
9
Note
I: Contingencies
Fuel
Tech
issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers.
Fuel Tech’s recognition of warranty liability is based, generally, on analyses
of warranty claims experience in the preceding years. Changes in the warranty
liability in 2008 are summarized below:
2008
|
||||
Aggregate
product warranty liability at January 1, 2008
|
$
|
464
|
||
Aggregate
accruals related to product warranties
|
30
|
|||
Aggregate
reductions for payments
|
(143
|
)
|
||
Aggregate
product warranty liability at June 30, 2008
|
$
|
351
|
10
Note
J: Income
Tax
Fuel
Tech
had unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 in the amount of $703.
This amount included $685 of unrecognized tax benefits which, if ultimately
recognized, will reduce Fuel Tech’s annual effective tax rate. There have been
no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the quarter ended June
30, 2008.
Note
K: Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FSP
No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delayed the
effective date of SFAS 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157) for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least
an
annual basis, until January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end entities. Also, in
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement
No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13,” which states that FASB Statement No.
13, “Accounting for Leases,” (SFAS 13) and other accounting pronouncements that
address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or
measurement under SFAS 13 are excluded from the provisions of SFAS 157, except
for assets and liabilities related to leases assumed in a business combination
that are required to be measured at fair value under SFAS No. 141, “Business
Combinations,” (SFAS 141) or SFAS No. 141R.
SFAS
157
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at
the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the
definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as
defined in SFAS 13. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on
market data oriented from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an
entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on
the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).
The
fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest
priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or
liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level
3).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described
below:
·
|
Level
1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at
the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or
liabilities.
|
·
|
Level
2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly,
including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in
markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that
are
observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and
inputs
that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data by correlation or other means.
|
·
|
Level
3 – Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and
unobservable.
|
In
April
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets,” to provide
guidance for determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets and
to
improve consistency between the period of expected cash flows used to measure
the fair value of a recognized intangible asset and the useful life of the
intangible asset as determined under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,” (SFAS 142). The FSP requires that an entity consider its own
historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements. However,
the entity must adjust that experience based on entity-specific factors under
SFAS 142.
FSP FAS
142-3 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods that begin after
November 15, 2008. The Company intends to adopt FSP FAS 142-3 effective January
1, 2009 and to apply its provisions prospectively to recognized intangible
assets acquired after that date. The Company has periodically purchased
recognized intangible assets and is in the process of evaluating the impact
that
the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 will have on its financial
statements.
11
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Item 2. |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
(in
thousands, except share and per-share
data)
|
Results
of Operations
Revenues
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $18,791 and $16,210,
respectively, while revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
were $39,258 and $32,472, respectively. The 21% increase in year-to-date
revenues versus the prior year is due to increases in both the nitrogen oxide
(NOx) reduction and fuel treatment chemical technology segments.
The
NOx
reduction technology segment generated revenues of $10,477 for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $2,829, or 37%, from the prior year.
This segment generated revenues of $22,146 for the six months ended June 30,
2008, an increase of $5,889, or 36%, from the prior year. The revenue increases
for the second quarter and six-month periods are due primarily to the
ongoing recognition of revenue on the $50 million in NOx reduction contracts
that were awarded to Fuel Tech in the second half of 2007.
Utilities
and industrial facilities across the country continue to plan for and implement
technologies to comply with national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) and with the Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR). Fuel
Tech’s technologies will serve as an important element in enabling thousands of
utility and industrial boiler units that are impacted by the CAA to attain
compliance. One of the rules with which utilities and industrial facilities
were
preparing for compliance was the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). Under CAIR,
utilities and industrial facilities in affected states would have had to comply
year-round with, among other items, NOx emission control levels beginning
January 1, 2009 with further mandated reductions beginning in 2015.
On
July
11, 2008, the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit vacated the CAIR regulations under the CAA under the premise that the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exceeded its authority when the
rule
was created in 2005. The court neither took issue with the concept that NOx
emissions are to be controlled nor over the limits and thresholds established
by
CAIR. At this time it is not known whether the EPA will appeal this ruling
during the allowable 60 day appeal period subsequent to the date of the ruling.
While we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, and any unfavorable
outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, cash flows, and financial position, the primary driver of CAIR,
the
Federal CAA, remains in effect and states must still comply with this
law.
The
fuel
treatment chemical technology segment revolves around the unique application
of
specialty chemicals to improve the efficiency, reliability and environmental
status of plants operating in the electric utility, industrial, pulp and paper,
and waste-to-energy markets. FUEL CHEM® programs are currently in place on 100
combustion units, treating a wide variety of solid and liquid fuels, including
coal, heavy oil, biomass and municipal waste.
The
fuel
treatment chemical technology segment generated revenues of $8,314 for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008, a slight decline from the comparable
period of the prior year. This segment generated revenues of $17,112 for the
six
months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $897, or 6%, over the prior year.
This segment’s growth during the first half of 2008 is indicative of the
continued market acceptance of Fuel Tech’s patented TIFI™ Targeted In-Furnace
Injection™ technology, particularly on coal-fired units, which represent the
largest market opportunity for the technology, both domestically and abroad.
While overall segment revenues have grown modestly, revenues from coal-fired
units have grown by 18% year over year. Partially offsetting the growth from
coal-fired units has been a decline in revenues from units that generate
electricity from the use of oil. The high price of oil has prevented the
oil-fired units from being dispatched for generation to the levels they
were in the prior year. Thus far in 2008, Fuel Tech has added 11 new
customer units to its installed base, nine coal-fired and two
oil-fired.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
was 52% and 56%, respectively. The cost of sales percentage for the NOx
reduction segment decreased to 54% from 62% in the comparable prior-year
period resulting from a mix of project business in favor of projects that
involve Fuel Tech’s technology scope of work only (which generate higher gross
margins) versus projects that also include turnkey installation work in addition
to Fuel Tech’s technology scope of work (which generate lower gross margins).
For the fuel treatment chemical technology segment, the cost of sales percentage
remained stable at 50%.
12
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007
was 52% and 56%, respectively. The cost of sales percentage for the NOx
reduction segment decreased to 53% from 60% in the comparable prior-year period,
again resulting from the mix of project business. For the fuel treatment
chemical technology segment, the cost of sales percentage remained stable at
51%.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for the second quarters ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $7,413 and $6,563, respectively, while these
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $14,392 and
$12,469, respectively. Of the $1,923 increase in SG&A for the six-month
period versus the prior year, $443 is due to stock-based compensation expense.
The remainder is due principally to employee-related costs resulting from the
expansion of the business both domestically and internationally.
Research
and development expenses for the second quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
were $909 and $557, respectively, while these expenses for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $1,464 and $1,111, respectively. The increase in
expenditures in this area is attributable to specific research and development
initiatives focused on further enhancing the efficacy of the FUEL CHEM
technology. Fuel Tech continues its efforts in the development and analysis
of
new technologies that could represent incremental market opportunities and
in
the development of enhanced capabilities to diagnose and provide solutions
to
complex operational conditions in customer boiler units.
The
$371,000 decline in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2008
versus the prior year reflects a significant reduction in short-term
interest rates versus those realized in the comparable period of the prior
year.
Income
tax expense for six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,307 and $543,
respectively. The increase is driven primarily by the increase in taxable
income.
Liquidity
and Sources of Capital
At
June
30, 2008, Fuel Tech had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
of
$28,959 and working capital of $43,200 versus $32,471 and $45,143 at the end
of
2007, respectively. Operating activities provided $3,307 of cash during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to favorable business
financial performance.
Investing
activities used cash of $5,821 during the six months ended June 30, 2008, as
the
$7,819 in capital expenditures utilized to support and enhance the operations
of
the business was partially offset by funds provided by the sale of short-term
investments of $1,998. The capital expenditure amount was comprised of
construction costs related to Fuel Tech’s new corporate headquarters and of
equipment purchases for the fuel treatment chemical technology segment. Fuel
Tech generated cash from financing activities in the amount of $891. Of this
amount, $723 related to the exercise of stock options, with $331 representing
proceeds derived from the exercise price of options exercised in the first
six
months of 2008, and $392 represents the excess tax benefits realized from the
exercise of stock options in the first six months of 2008. Fuel Tech generated
cash in an amount of $36 resulting from the issuance of directors’ deferred
shares of stock. Finally, Beijing Fuel Tech borrowed $132 in funds to meet
the
short-term working capital needs of this new legal entity.
In
the
opinion of management, Fuel Tech’s expected near-term revenue growth will be
driven by the timing of penetration of the coal-fired utility marketplace via
utilization of its TIFI technology, by utility and industrial entities’
adherence to the NOx reduction requirements of the various domestic
environmental regulations, and by the expansion of both business segments in
non-U.S. geographies. Fuel Tech expects its liquidity requirements to be met
by
the operating results generated from these activities.
Contingencies
and Contractual Obligations
Fuel
Tech
issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers
as
discussed in Note H. The change in the warranty liability balance during the
six
months ended June 30, 2008 was not material.
13
Forward-Looking
Statements
Statements
in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, so-called “forward-looking
statements,” are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that all
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those
detailed in Fuel Tech’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See
“Risk Factors of the Business” in Item 1A, and also Item 7, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in
Fuel Tech’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign
Currency Risk Management
Fuel
Tech’s earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. Fuel Tech does not enter into foreign currency
forward contracts or into foreign currency option contracts to manage this
risk
due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
Fuel
Tech
maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in Fuel Tech’s filings under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and forms. Fuel Tech’s management, with the participation of
its principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness
of Fuel Tech’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Fuel Tech’s principal executive
and financial officers have concluded, based on such evaluation, that such
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such
period.
There
was
no change in Fuel Tech’s internal control over financial reporting that was
identified in connection with such evaluation that occurred during the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected,
or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, Fuel Tech’s internal control over
financial reporting.
14
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
None
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
None
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item
3. Defaults
upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
annual meeting of stockholders of Fuel Tech, Inc. was held on May 22, 2008.
The
matters voted on were the election of nine directors and the approval of the
appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as Fuel Tech, Inc.’s independent registered
public accountants for the year 2008. The nine director nominees were elected
and the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP was approved.
The
details of the voting at the annual meeting are as follows:
For
the
directors:
Director
|
For
|
Withheld
|
|||||
Douglas
G. Bailey
|
13,696,741
|
820,995
|
|||||
Ralph
E. Bailey
|
13,805,504
|
712,232
|
|||||
Miguel
Espinosa
|
13,866,606
|
651,130
|
|||||
Charles
W. Grinnell
|
13,631,669
|
886,067
|
|||||
Thomas
L. Jones
|
13,833,502
|
684,234
|
|||||
John
D. Morrow
|
13,823,543
|
694,193
|
|||||
John
F. Norris Jr.
|
13,806,451
|
711,285
|
|||||
Thomas
S. Shaw, Jr.
|
13,757,809
|
759,927
|
|||||
D.L.
Williamson
|
13,833,297
|
684,449
|
For
the
Grant Thornton LLP appointment approval:
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|||||
14,299,628
|
173,599
|
44,509
|
Item
5. Other
Information
None
15
Item
6. Exhibits
a. Exhibits
Exhibit
31.1 and 31.2 are filed herewith
Exhibit
32 is furnished herewith
16
FUEL
TECH, INC.
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
By:
|
/s/
John F. Norris Jr.
|
|
John F. Norris Jr.
|
||
Director,
President
and
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
Date:
August 11, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
John P. Graham
|
John P. Graham
|
||
Chief Financial Officer,
|
||
Sr. Vice President and
|
||
Treasurer
|
17