FUEL TECH, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33059
FUEL TECH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-5657551 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Fuel Tech, Inc.
27601 Bella Vista Parkway
Warrenville, IL 60555-1617
630-845-4500
27601 Bella Vista Parkway
Warrenville, IL 60555-1617
630-845-4500
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated
filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On November 1, 2010 there were outstanding 24,213,467 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share, of the registrant.
FUEL TECH, INC.
Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010
Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010
INDEX
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
FUEL TECH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Note B) | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | | $ | 200 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
23,895 | 20,965 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $72 and $70, respectively |
22,312 | 17,877 | ||||||
Inventories |
901 | 450 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
636 | 636 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
2,377 | 2,294 | ||||||
Total current assets |
50,121 | 42,422 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $16,498 and $14,562, respectively |
14,290 | 15,549 | ||||||
Goodwill |
21,051 | 21,051 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $3,481 and $2,817, respectively |
6,225 | 6,749 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,482 | 4,183 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,557 | 2,308 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 99,726 | $ | 92,262 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 2,239 | $ | 2,925 | ||||
Accounts payable |
6,657 | 5,824 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Employee compensation |
2,090 | 671 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
3,688 | 2,424 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
14,674 | 11,844 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
2,348 | 2,196 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
17,022 | 14,040 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares
authorized, 24,213,467 and 24,211,967 shares issued,
respectively |
242 | 242 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
129,238 | 125,458 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(47,109 | ) | (47,828 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
257 | 269 | ||||||
Nil coupon perpetual loan notes |
76 | 81 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
82,704 | 78,222 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 99,726 | $ | 92,262 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
FUEL TECH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 20,279 | $ | 16,475 | $ | 56,798 | $ | 52,714 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
11,496 | 10,034 | 32,063 | 31,786 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
7,808 | 8,000 | 23,306 | 25,130 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) from revaluation of contingent performance obligation |
(768 | ) | (781 | ) | (768 | ) | (781 | ) | ||||||||
Research and development |
264 | 160 | 575 | 391 | ||||||||||||
18,800 | 17,413 | 55,176 | 56,526 | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,479 | (938 | ) | 1,622 | (3,812 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
(33 | ) | (27 | ) | (110 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
4 | 7 | 6 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
89 | (4 | ) | (169 | ) | (166 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
1,539 | (962 | ) | 1,349 | (4,031 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
(722 | ) | 264 | (627 | ) | 1,493 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 817 | $ | (698 | ) | 722 | $ | (2,538 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) per Common Share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.11 | ) | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.11 | ) | ||||||
Weighted-average number of Common Shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
24,213,000 | 24,142,000 | 24,213,000 | 24,127,000 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
24,381,000 | 24,142,000 | 24,401,000 | 24,127,000 | ||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
FUEL TECH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 4,654 | $ | 7,502 | ||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of business |
| (20,186 | ) | |||||
Decrease (Increase) in restricted cash |
200 | (881 | ) | |||||
Purchases of property, equipment and intangible assets |
(1,305 | ) | (1,774 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,105 | ) | (22,841 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
(Repayment of) proceeds from short-term borrowings |
(686 | ) | 5 | |||||
Issuance of deferred shares |
74 | 63 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants |
10 | 251 | ||||||
Redemption of nil coupon loan note |
(5 | ) | | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(607 | ) | 319 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash |
(12 | ) | 74 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,930 | (14,946 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
20,965 | 28,149 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 23,895 | $ | 13,203 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
FUEL TECH, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
September 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per-share data)
Note A: Nature of Business
Fuel Tech,
Inc. (Fuel Tech or the Company or we, us, or
our) is a fully integrated company
that uses a suite of advanced technologies to provide boiler optimization, efficiency improvement
and air pollution reduction and control solutions to utility and industrial customers worldwide.
Originally incorporated in 1987 under the laws of the Netherlands Antilles as Fuel-Tech N.V., Fuel
Tech became domesticated in the United States on September 30, 2006, and continues as a Delaware
corporation with its corporate headquarters at 27601 Bella Vista Parkway, Warrenville, Illinois,
60555-1617. Fuel Tech maintains an Internet website at www.ftek.com. Fuel Techs annual report on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as
amended (Exchange Act), are made available through our website as soon as reasonably practical
after electronically filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also available
on Fuel Techs website are the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct, as well as the charters of the Audit and Compensation & Nominating committees of
the Board of Directors. All of these documents are available in print without charge to
stockholders who request them. Information on our website is not incorporated into this report.
Fuel Techs special focus is the worldwide marketing of its nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction and FUEL
CHEM® processes. The Air Pollution Control (APC) technology segment reduces NOx
emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources
by utilizing combustion optimization techniques and Low NOx and Ultra low NOx burners; over-fire
air systems, NOxOUT® and HERT High Energy Reagent Technology SNCR systems;
systems that incorporate ASCR (Advanced Selective Catalytic Reduction) technology
including CASCADE; ULTRA and NOxOUT-SCR® processes; and Ammonia
Injection Grids (AIG) and the Graduated Straightening Grid (GSG). The FUEL CHEM®
technology segment improves the efficiency, reliability and environmental status of combustion
units by controlling slagging, fouling and corrosion, as well as the formation of sulfur trioxide,
ammonium bisulfate, particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon dioxide, NOx and unburned carbon
in fly ash through the addition of chemicals into the fuel or via TIFI® Targeted
In-Furnace Injection programs. Fuel Tech has other technologies, both commercially available and
in the development stage, all of which are related to APC and FUEL CHEM technology segments or are
similar in their technological base. Fuel Techs business is materially dependent on the continued
existence and enforcement of worldwide air quality regulations.
Note B: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X of the Exchange Act. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation of the balance sheet and results of operations for the periods covered have been
included and all significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The
results of operations of all acquired businesses have been consolidated for all periods subsequent
to the date of acquisition.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at
that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in Fuel Techs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4
Table of Contents
Note C: Revenue Recognition Policy
Revenues from the sales of chemical products are recorded when title transfers, either at the point
of shipment or at the point of destination, depending on the contract with the customer.
Fuel Tech uses the percentage of completion method of accounting for equipment construction and
license contracts that are sold within the APC technology segment. Under the percentage of
completion method, revenues are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between
actual construction costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Revisions in completion
estimates and contract values in the period in which the facts giving rise to the revisions become
known can influence the timing of when revenues are recognized under the percentage of completion
method of accounting. Provisions are made for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in the
period in which such losses are determined. As of September 30, 2010 the Company had one
construction contract in progress that was identified as a loss contract in the amount of $499.
Fuel Techs APC contracts are typically six to twelve months in length. A typical contract will
have three or four critical operational measurements that, when achieved, serve as the basis for us
to invoice the customer via progress billings. At a minimum, these measurements will include the
generation of engineering drawings, the shipment of equipment and the completion of a system
performance test.
As part of a majority of its contractual APC project agreements, Fuel Tech will agree to
customer-specific acceptance criteria that relate to the operational performance of the system that
is being sold. These criteria are determined based on mathematical modeling that is performed by
Fuel Tech personnel, which is based on operational inputs that are provided by the customer. The
customer will warrant that these operational inputs are accurate as they are specified in the
binding contractual agreement. Further, the customer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the
operating condition information; all performance guarantees and equipment warranties granted by us
are void if the operating condition information is inaccurate or is not met.
Fuel Tech has installed over 580 units with APC technology. As part of the project implementation
process, we perform system start-up and optimization services that effectively serve as a test of
actual project performance. We believe that this test, combined with the accuracy of the modeling
that is performed, enables revenue to be recognized prior to the receipt of formal customer
acceptance.
Accounts receivable includes unbilled receivables, representing revenues recognized in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts under the percentage of completion method of accounting. At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, unbilled receivables were approximately $10,417 and
$7,814, respectively. Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
were $302 and $316, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Such amounts are
included in other accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
Note D: Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes all internal and external engineering costs, equipment and chemical charges,
inbound and outbound freight expenses, internal and site transfer costs, installation charges,
purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, project personnel travel
expenses and other direct and indirect expenses specifically identified as project- or product
line-related, as appropriate (e.g., test equipment depreciation and certain insurance expenses).
Certain depreciation and amortization expenses related to tangible and intangible assets,
respectively, are also allocated to cost of sales.
Note E: Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily include the following categories except
where an allocation to the cost of sales line item is warranted due to the project- or product-line
nature of a portion of the expense category: salaries and wages, employee benefits, non-project
travel, insurance, legal, rent, accounting and auditing, recruiting, telephony, employee training,
Board of Directors fees, auto rental, office supplies, dues and subscriptions, utilities, real
estate taxes, commissions and bonuses, marketing materials, postage and business taxes. Departments
comprising the selling, general and administrative line item primarily include the functions of
executive management, finance and accounting, investor relations, regulatory affairs, marketing,
business development, information technology, human resources, sales, legal and general
administration.
5
Table of Contents
Note F: Earnings per Share Data
Basic earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and warrants and of the nil
coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes. Diluted earnings per share includes the
dilutive effect of stock options and warrants and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible
unsecured loan notes. The following table sets forth the weighted-average shares used in
calculating the earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010
and 2009:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic weighted-average shares |
24,213 | 24,142 | 24,213 | 24,127 | ||||||||||||
Conversion of unsecured loan notes |
7 | | 7 | | ||||||||||||
Unexercised options and warrants |
161 | | 181 | | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average shares |
24,381 | 24,142 | 24,401 | 24,127 | ||||||||||||
Note G: Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) for Fuel Tech is comprised of net income (loss) and the impact of
foreign currency translation as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30 | September 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income ( loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 817 | $ | (698 | ) | $ | 722 | $ | (2,538 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation |
105 | 39 | (12 | ) | 74 | |||||||||||
$ | 922 | $ | (659 | ) | $ | 710 | $ | (2,464 | ) | |||||||
6
Table of Contents
Note H: Stock-Based Compensation
Fuel Tech has a stock-based employee compensation plan, referred to as the Fuel Tech, Inc.
Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan), under which awards may be granted to participants in the form of
Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Performance Awards, Bonuses or other forms of share-based or non-share-based awards or combinations
thereof. Participants in the Incentive Plan may be Fuel Techs directors, officers, employees,
consultants or advisors (except consultants or advisors in capital-raising transactions) as the
directors determine are key to the success of Fuel Techs business. The amount of shares that may
be issued or reserved for awards to participants under a 2004 amendment to the Incentive Plan is
12.5% of outstanding shares calculated on a diluted basis. At September 30, 2010, Fuel Tech has
493,000 stock options available for issuance under the Incentive Plan.
Fuel Tech utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock
option grants. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2010 of $1,176 and $3,695, respectively. Fuel Tech recorded $1,462 and
$4,628 in stock-based compensation expense for the comparable periods in 2009.
The awards granted under the Incentive Plan have a 10-year life and they vest as follows: 50% after
the second anniversary of the award date, 25% after the third anniversary, and the final 25% after
the fourth anniversary of the award date. Fuel Tech calculates stock compensation expense based on
the grant date fair value of the award and recognizes expense on a straight-line basis over the
four-year service period of the award.
The principal variable assumptions utilized in valuing options and the methodology for estimating
such model inputs include: (1) risk-free interest rate an estimate based on the yield of
zerocoupon treasury securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option; (2)
expected volatility an estimate based on the historical volatility of Fuel Techs Common Stock
for a period equal to the expected life of the option; and (3) expected life of the option an
estimate based on historical experience including the effect of employee terminations.
Based on the results of the model, the weighted-average fair value of the stock options granted
during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 was $3.30 per share using the following
assumptions:
2010 | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.00 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.74 | % | ||
Expected volatility |
63.27 | % | ||
Expected life of option |
5.9 years |
7
Table of Contents
Stock option activity for Fuel Techs Incentive Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
was as follows:
Number | Weighted- | Weighted-Average | ||||||||||||||
of | Average | Remaining | Aggregate Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Options | Exercise Price | Contractual Term | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding on January 1, 2010 |
3,051,125 | $ | 15.28 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
110,000 | 5.71 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(1,500 | ) | 6.35 | |||||||||||||
Expired or forfeited |
(263,500 | ) | 17.00 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding on September 30, 2010 |
2,896,125 | 14.77 | 6.2 years | $ | 999 | |||||||||||
Exercisable on September 30, 2010 |
2,146,875 | 14.50 | 5.6 years | $ | 987 |
Non-vested stock award activity for all plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was as
follows:
Non-vested Stock Outstanding |
||||
Outstanding on January 1, 2010 |
1,267,125 | |||
Granted |
110,000 | |||
Released |
(394,625 | ) | ||
Expired or forfeited |
(233,250 | ) | ||
Outstanding on September 30, 2010 |
749,250 | |||
As of September 30, 2010, there was $4,434 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive Plan. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a period of four years.
In addition to the Incentive Plan, Fuel Tech has a Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors
(Deferred Plan). This Deferred Plan, as originally approved, provided for deferral of directors
fees in the form of either cash with interest or as phantom stock units, in either case, however,
to be paid out only as cash and not as stock at the elected time of payout. In the second quarter
of 2007, Fuel Tech obtained stockholder approval for an amendment to the Deferred Plan to provide
that instead of phantom stock units paid out only in cash, the deferred stock unit compensation may
be paid out in shares of Fuel Tech Common Stock. Under the guidance of ASC 718-10, this plan
modification required that Fuel Tech account for awards under the plan for the receipt of Fuel Tech
Common Stock as equity awards as opposed to liability awards. For the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, Fuel Tech recorded stock-based compensation expense of $73 and $63,
respectively, with a credit of the same amount to additional paid-in capital representing the fair
value of the stock awards granted.
At September 30, 2010, Fuel Tech had 2,310,738 stock options with exercise prices per share that
were not dilutive for the purpose of inclusion in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
Note I: Debt
On June 30, 2009, Fuel Tech entered into a $25,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (JPM Chase). The Facility has a term of two years through June 30, 2011,
is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread range of 250 basis points to 375
basis points, as determined under a formula related to the Companys leverage ratio, and
8
Table of Contents
has the Companys Italian subsidiary, Fuel Tech S.r.l., as a guarantor. Fuel Tech can use this
Facility for cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2010, there were no
outstanding borrowings on this Facility.
At its inception, the Facility contained several debt covenants with which the Company must comply
on a quarterly or annual basis, including: an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000 and a
minimum net income for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 of $750. For subsequent
periods, the Facility covenants included an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000, a maximum
funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75:1.0 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and a maximum
funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5:1.0 for all succeeding quarterly periods until the facility
expires. Maximum funded debt is defined as all borrowed funds, outstanding standby letters of
credit and bank guarantees. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest expense,
income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expenses. In addition, the Company must maintain a
minimum tangible net worth of $42,000, adjusted upward for 50% of net income generated and 100% of
all capital issuances.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants of the Facility,
including a year-to-date capital expenditure amount of $1,305 and a tangible net worth amount of
$55,428 which was above the required amount of $51,869 by $3,560.
Beijing Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility (the China Facility) agreement with JPM
Chase for RMB 45 million (approximately $6,700), which expires on June 30, 2011. The facility is
unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 120% of the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) Base Rate
(approximately 5.83% at September 30, 2010) and does not contain any material debt covenants.
Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances and bank guarantees. As of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, Beijing Fuel Tech has borrowings outstanding in the amounts of $2,239
and $2,925, respectively.
At September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees,
predominantly to customers, totaling approximately $1,218 in connection with contracts in process.
Fuel Tech is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any payments made by the bank under
these instruments. At September 30, 2010, there were no cash borrowings under the revolving credit
facility and approximately $23,781 was available.
In the event of default on either the Facility or the China Facility, the cross default feature in
each allows the lending bank to accelerate the payment of any amounts outstanding and may, under
certain circumstances, allow the bank to cancel the facility. If the Company were unable to obtain
a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts,
such acceleration may cause the Companys cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were
insufficient to satisfy the payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to
satisfy the accelerated payment.
Note J: Business Segment and Geographic Disclosures
Fuel Tech segregates its financial results into two reportable segments representing two broad
technology segments as follows:
| The Air Pollution Control technology segment, which includes the Low-and Ultra Low NOx Burners, Over-Fire Air systems, HERT system, NOxOUT®, CASCADE, AIG, GSG, ULTRA and NOxOUT-SCR® processes for the reduction of NOx emissions in flue gas from boilers, incinerators, furnaces and other stationary combustion sources; and | ||
| The FUEL CHEM® technology segment, which uses chemical processes for the control of slagging, fouling, corrosion, opacity, acid plume and sulfur trioxide-related issues in furnaces and boilers through the addition of chemicals into the fuel using TIFI® Targeted In-Furnace Injection technology. |
The Other classification includes those profit and loss items not allocated by Fuel Tech to each
reportable segment. Further, there are no intersegment sales that require elimination.
Fuel Tech evaluates performance and allocates resources based on reviewing gross margin by
reportable segment. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Fuel Tech does not review assets by
reportable segment, but rather, in aggregate for Fuel Tech as a whole.
9
Table of Contents
Three months ended | Air Pollution | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Control Segment | FUEL CHEM Segment | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 10,252 | $ | 10,027 | $ | | $ | 20,279 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
6,735 | 4,761 | | 11,496 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
3,517 | 5,266 | | 8,783 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| | 7,808 | 7,808 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) from revaluation of
contingent performance obligation |
| | (768 | ) | (768 | ) | ||||||||||
Research and development |
| | 264 | 264 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 3,517 | $ | 5,266 | $ | (7,304 | ) | $ | 1,479 | |||||||
Three months ended | Air Pollution | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | Control Segment | FUEL CHEM Segment | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 6,182 | $ | 10,293 | $ | | $ | 16,475 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
4,089 | 5,945 | | 10,034 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
2,093 | 4,348 | | 6,441 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| | 8,000 | 8,000 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) from revaluation of
contingent performance obligation |
| | (781 | ) | (781 | ) | ||||||||||
Research and development |
| | 160 | 160 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 2,093 | $ | 4,348 | $ | (7,379 | ) | $ | (938 | ) | ||||||
Nine months ended | Air Pollution | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Control Segment | FUEL CHEM Segment | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 27,757 | $ | 29,041 | $ | | $ | 56,798 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
18,039 | 14,024 | | 32,063 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
9,718 | 15,017 | | 24,735 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| | 23,306 | 23,306 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) from revaluation of
contingent performance
obligation |
| | (768 | ) | (768 | ) | ||||||||||
Research and development |
| | 575 | 575 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 9,718 | $ | 15,017 | $ | (23,113 | ) | $ | 1,622 | |||||||
Nine months ended | Air Pollution | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2009 | Control Segment | FUEL CHEM Segment | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 24,179 | $ | 28,535 | $ | | $ | 52,714 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
15,096 | 16,690 | | 31,786 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin |
9,083 | 11,845 | | 20,928 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| | 25,130 | 25,130 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) from revaluation of
contingent performance
obligation |
| | (781 | ) | (781 | ) | ||||||||||
Research and development |
| | 391 | 391 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 9,083 | $ | 11,845 | $ | (24,740 | ) | $ | (3,812 | ) | ||||||
10
Table of Contents
Information concerning Fuel Techs operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues are
attributed to countries based on the location of the customer. Assets are those directly
associated with operations of the geographic area.
Three months ended September 30 | Nine months ended September 30 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 17,015 | $ | 14,054 | $ | 46,517 | $ | 43,114 | ||||||||
Foreign |
3,264 | 2,421 | 10,281 | 9,600 | ||||||||||||
$ | 20,279 | $ | 16,475 | $ | 56,798 | $ | 52,714 | |||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 88,425 | $ | 82,261 | ||||||||||||
Foreign |
11,301 | 10,001 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 99,726 | $ | 92,262 | |||||||||||||
Note K: Contingencies
Fuel Tech issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers. Fuel
Techs recognition of warranty liability is based, generally, on analyses of warranty claims
experience in the preceding years. Our recognition of warranty liability is based primarily on
analyses of warranty claims experienced in the preceding years as the nature of our historical
product sales for which we offer a warranty are substantially unchanged. This approach provides an
aggregate warranty accrual that is historically aligned with actual warranty claims experienced.
Changes in the warranty liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are summarized
below:
Aggregate product warranty liability at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 199 | ||
Aggregate accruals related to product warranties |
100 | |||
Aggregate reductions for payments |
97 | |||
Aggregate product warranty liability at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 202 | ||
Note L: Income Tax
Fuel Tech had unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 in the amount of $870. This amount
included $840 of unrecognized tax benefits which, if ultimately recognized, will reduce Fuel Techs
annual effective tax rate. There have been no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
11
Table of Contents
Note M: Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance on
subsequent events. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the
date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial
statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that expands the required disclosures about
fair value measurements. This guidance provides for new disclosures requiring the Company to (i)
disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers and (ii) present separately
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair
value measurements. This guidance also provides clarification of existing disclosures requiring the
Company to (i) determine each class of assets and liabilities based on the nature and risks of the
investments rather than by major security type and (ii) for each class of assets and liabilities,
disclose the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both Level 2 and Level
3 fair value measurements. This guidance became effective for Fuel Tech on January 1, 2010, except
for the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level
3 fair value measurements, which is effective for Fuel Tech on January 1, 2011, and did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. The guidance pertaining to the
presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair
value measurements is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
Note N: Business Acquisitions
Fuel Tech accounts for its acquisitions as purchases in accordance with ASC 805. Accordingly, in
connection with each acquisition, the purchase price is allocated to the estimated fair values of
all acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities as of the date of the
acquisition.
Advanced Combustion Technology, Inc.
On January 5, 2009, Fuel Tech completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
Advanced Combustion Technology, Inc. (ACT or the ACT Acquisition) for approximately $22,500 in
cash, including transaction costs, plus future consideration if certain financial performance is
achieved. In connection with the final determination of the Adjustment Calculation (as defined in
the asset purchase agreement) related to the net working capital amount, Fuel Tech paid ACT an
additional $1,523 on July 23, 2009. All of the goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes. Operating results related to the acquisition of substantially all of the
assets of ACT and all of the related goodwill are reported as part of the APC Technology segment.
Acquisition related costs, including out-of-pocket expenses related to the transaction, were
insignificant.
Below is a breakdown of amounts recognized as of the acquisition date for each major class of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of the Companys acquisition of ACT:
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | ||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 5,928 | ||
Identifiable intangible assets |
5,817 | |||
Other assets |
247 | |||
Contingent consideration |
2,307 | |||
Accounts payable |
(2,673 | ) | ||
Other current liabilities |
(402 | ) | ||
Total identifiable net assets |
8,917 | |||
Goodwill |
15,880 | |||
Total net assets recorded |
$ | 24,797 | ||
At March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a contingent consideration accrual representing the fair
value of future consideration expected to be paid in connection with the acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of ACT of $2,307. The contingent consideration arrangement requires the Company to pay ACT a pro rata amount of up to
$4,000 annually for the achievement of
12
Table of Contents
a minimum annual gross margin dollar level (the Hurdle) of
$10,000, $11,000 and $12,000 in fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company
is required to pay ACT thirty-five percent (35%) of all qualifying gross margin dollars above the
annual Hurdle rate for each of the three years. The potential undiscounted amount of all future
payments that the Company could be required to make under the contingent consideration arrangement
is between $0 and $4,000 in any one year, and $0 and $12,000 in total, not including the amount
related to the thirty-five percent (35%) sharing of qualifying gross margin dollars above the
pre-determined Hurdle. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement of $2,307 was
calculated using a probability of payout for each of the three years and included only twenty-five
percent (25%) of the weighted-average, probable three-year aggregate payout as up to seventy-five
percent (75%) of the contingent consideration is subject to forfeiture.
The Company periodically evaluates the probability that payment of the contingent consideration
accrual is probable based on a range of outcomes and assumptions used to develop the estimates.
Based upon this analysis, management concluded during the September 30, 2010 quarter that the
payout for 2010 was not probable of being made. Thus, the Company recorded a gain of $768 from the
revaluation of the contingent liability. A similar adjustment was made in the corresponding period
during 2009 for $781.
Note O: Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated to each of Fuel Techs reporting units after considering the nature of the
net assets giving rise to the goodwill and how each reporting unit would enjoy the benefits and
synergies of the net assets acquired. Fuel Tech has two reporting units which are reported in the
FUEL CHEM segment and the APC technology segment. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
goodwill allocated to the FUEL CHEM technology segment was $1,723 and $1,723, respectively, while
goodwill allocated to the APC Technology segment was $19,328 and $19,328, respectively.
13
Table of Contents
FUEL TECH, INC.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by $3,804
(23%) to $20,279 from $16,475. Consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 increased by $4,084 (8%) to $56,798 from $52,714. Domestic revenues for the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 increased by $2,961 (21%) and $3,403 (8%),
respectively, while our foreign revenues for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2010 also increased by $843 (35%) and $681 (7%), respectively.
The Air Pollution Control (APC) technology segment revenues for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 increased $4,070 (66%) to $10,252 from $6,182. The APC technology segment
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by 3,579 (15%) to $27,757
from $24,179. The APC technology segment revenue is reflective of the timing of recognition of
prior period bookings and work progress on construction projects. This segment remains uniquely
positioned to capitalize on the next phase of increasingly stringent U.S. air quality standards,
specifically on NOx control. Interest in Fuel Techs suite of pollution control technologies, on
both a new and retrofit basis, remains strong, both domestically and abroad.
Consolidated APC technology segment backlog at September 30, 2010 was $20,305 versus backlog at
September 30, 2009 of approximately $11,149. We currently anticipate that a large portion of the
backlog as of September 30, 2010 will be recognized as revenue in fiscal 2010, although the timing
of such revenue recognition in 2010 is subject to the timing of the expenses incurred on existing
projects and customer scheduling.
The FUEL CHEM technology segment revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
decreased $266 (3%) to $10,027 from $10,293. The FUEL CHEM technology segment revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 increased by $506 (2%) to $29,041 from $28,535. Our
nine-month revenue total includes a one-time risk share payment relating to a successful
demonstration performed in the prior year. We believe the marketplace acceptance for Fuel Techs
patented TIFI® Targeted In-Furnace Injection technology remains strong, particularly on coal-fired
units which represents the largest market opportunity for the technology.
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
decreased by 4% to 57% from 61%. The cost of sales percentage for the APC technology segment of
66% did not change from the prior year. Our APC technology segment cost of sales remains slightly
above our historical cost of sales percentages due to a large system installation that has a
significant construction component that will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2010 for
which the Company will receive lower profit margins than a typical APC equipment sale. For the FUEL
CHEM technology segment, the cost of sales percentage decreased by 11% to 47% from 58%. This
decrease was primarily due to international demonstration costs that were incurred in the second
quarter of 2009 and the one-time risk share payment mentioned above.
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
decreased by 4% to 56% from 60%. The cost of sales percentage for the APC technology segment
increased to 65% from 62%. For the FUEL CHEM technology segment, the cost of sales percentage
decreased to 48% from 58%. This decrease was primarily due to recognition of the one-time risk
share payment mentioned above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 decreased by $192 (2%) to $7,808 from $8,000. SG&A for the nine-month periods ending
September 30, 2010 and 2009 decreased by $1,824 (7%) to $23,306 from $25,130. The $1,824 decrease
for the nine month period is comprised of $1,250 relating to the reallocation of corporate
resources, $912 for stock compensation expense, $325 for costs relating to the administration of
foreign offices, $341 for fees to outside service providers, and $146 for depreciation relating to
a fully capitalized leasehold improvement. Partially offsetting this amount is $844 of additional
expense related to corporate incentive plans and $287 in additional recruiting fees for executive
officer positions.
The Company recorded a one-time gain of $768 from the revaluation of the contingent liability
recorded in connection with the ACT Acquisition in January 2009. The $768 had been recorded in the
first quarter of 2009 as part of a $2,307 contingent consideration accrual representing the fair
value, weighted-average probability of future consideration expected to be paid in
14
Table of Contents
connection with the ACT Acquisition. For the year ended December 31, 2010, management has
concluded that an earnout payment related to the ACT Acquisition for fiscal 2009 is not probable,
thus the $768 portion of the total contingent liability that related to 2010 was reversed.
Research and development (R&D) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
increased to $264 from $160, while R&D expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 also increased to $575 from $391. The Companys increased R&D costs are due primarily to
expenditures made relating to new FUEL CHEM product offerings.
Interest expense for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 totaled $33 and
$110, respectively, and relates to borrowings for the Beijing Fuel Tech Facility. A portion of the
borrowings was repaid during the second quarter of 2010.
The income tax expense (benefit) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
totaled $722 and ($264), while the income tax expense (benefit) for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled 627 and ($1,493), respectively. We are projecting a
consolidated effective tax rate of 46.5% for 2010.
Liquidity and Sources of Capital
At September 30, 2010, Fuel Tech had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand
of $23,895 and working capital of $35,447 versus $20,965 and $30,578 at December 31, 2009,
respectively.
Operating
activities provided $4,654 of cash during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010,
primarily due to the add back of non-cash items including stock compensation expense of $3,695,
depreciation expense of $2,440, amortization expense of $665, and an increase in other noncurrent
liabilities of $3,602. Partially offsetting these items was a decrease in income tax provision of
$1,298, a decrease of $4,435 in accounts receivable, and the reduction of a contingent consideration accrual of $768 related to the acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of ACT.
Investing
activities used cash of $1,105 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This
amount is comprised of two items: capital expenditures of $1,305, primarily to support and
enhance the operations of the FUEL CHEM technology segment, and a
decrease of restricted cash of $200.
On June 30, 2009, Fuel Tech entered into a $25,000 revolving credit facility (the Facility) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (JPM Chase). The Facility has a term of two years through June 30, 2011,
is unsecured, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread range of 250 basis points to 375
basis points, as determined under a formula related to the Companys leverage ratio, and has the
Companys Italian subsidiary, Fuel Tech S.r.l., as a guarantor. Fuel Tech can use this Facility for
cash advances and standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2010, there were no outstanding
borrowings on this Facility.
At its inception, the Facility contained several debt covenants with which the Company must comply
on a quarterly or annual basis, including: an annual capital expenditure limit of $10,000 and a
minimum net income for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 of $750. For subsequent
periods, the Facility covenants included an annual capital expenditure limited of $10,000, a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.75:1.0 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 and a
maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.5:1.0 for all succeeding quarterly periods until the
facility expires. Maximum funded debt is defined as all borrowed funds, outstanding standby letters
of credit and bank guarantees. EBITDA includes after tax earnings with add backs for interest
expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expenses. In addition, the Company must
maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $42,000, adjusted upward for 50% of net income generated
and 100% of all capital issuances.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants of the Facility,
including a year-to-date capital expenditure amount of $663 and a tangible net worth amount of
$55,428 which was above the required amount of $51,869 by $3,560.
Beijing Fuel Tech Environmental Technologies Company, Ltd. (Beijing Fuel Tech), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fuel Tech, has a revolving credit facility (the China Facility) agreement with JPM
Chase for RMB 45 million (approximately $6,600), which expires on June 30, 2011. The facility is
unsecured, bears interest at a rate of 120% of the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) Base Rate and does
not contain any material debt covenants. Beijing Fuel Tech can use this facility for cash advances
and bank
guarantees. As of September 30, 2010, Beijing Fuel Tech has borrowings outstanding in the amount
$2,239, which bears interest at 5.83% .
15
Table of Contents
At September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit and bank guarantees,
predominantly to customers, totaling approximately $1,218 in connection with contracts in process.
Fuel Tech is committed to reimbursing the issuing bank for any payments made by the bank under
these instruments. At September 30, 2010, there were no cash borrowings under the revolving credit
facility and approximately $23,782 was available.
In the event of default on either the Facility or the China Facility, the cross default feature in
each allows the lending bank to accelerate the payment of any amounts outstanding and may, under
certain circumstances, allow the bank to cancel the facility. If the Company were unable to obtain
a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts,
such acceleration may cause the Companys cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were
insufficient to satisfy the payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to
satisfy the accelerated payment.
The Company utilized cash from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
of $607, primarily from the repayment of a portion of the debt outstanding for the China facility.
Partially offsetting this amount was $74 from non-cash stock-based compensation from the issuance
of directors deferred shares of stock.
In the opinion of management, Fuel Techs expected near-term revenue growth will be driven by the
timing of penetration of the utility marketplace via utilization of its TIFI technology, by utility
and industrial entities adherence to the NOx reduction requirements of the various domestic
environmental regulations, and by the expansion of both business segments in non-U.S. geographies.
Fuel Tech expects its liquidity requirements to be met by the operating results generated from
these activities.
Contingencies and Contractual Obligations
Fuel Tech issues a standard product warranty with the sale of its products to customers as
discussed in Note K. The change in the warranty liability balance during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 was not material.
16
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, as defined in Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and reflect Fuel Techs current
expectations regarding future growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and business
prospects, and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available
to, our management. Fuel Tech has tried to identify forward-looking statements by using words such
as anticipate, believe, plan, expect, estimate, intend, will, and similar
expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements.
These statements are based on information currently available to Fuel Tech and are subject to
various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in
Fuel Techs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in Item 1A under the
caption Risk Factors, which could cause Fuel Techs actual growth, results of operations,
financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Fuel Tech undertakes no
obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking
statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances or for
any other reason. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, including those detailed in Fuel Techs filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Foreign Currency Risk Management
Fuel Techs earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. We do not enter into foreign currency forward contracts nor into foreign currency
option contracts to manage this risk due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
Fuel Tech is also exposed to changes in interest rates primarily due to its long-term debt
arrangement (refer to Note I to the consolidated financial statements). A hypothetical 100 basis
point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not have a
materially adverse effect on interest expense during the upcoming year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Fuel Tech maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure (a)
that information required to be disclosed in Fuel Techs filings under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and (b) that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officer, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Fuel Techs Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, as defined
in Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d -15(e) of the Exchange Act,, as of the end of the period covered by
this report, and they have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
17
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | |
None |
Item 1A. Risk Factors | ||
The risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 have not materially changed. |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
None |
Item 6. | Exhibits |
a. | Exhibits (all filed herewith) |
31.1
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
18
Table of Contents
FUEL TECH, INC.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 4, 2010 | By: | /s/ Douglas G. Bailey | ||
Douglas G. Bailey | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: November 4, 2010 | By: | /s/ David S. Collins | ||
David S. Collins | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
19