FUSE GROUP HOLDING INC. - Quarter Report: 2016 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission file number: 333-202948
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
|
47-1017473
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
444 E. Huntington Dr., Suite 105
Arcadia, CA 91006
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
Arcadia, CA 91006
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
(626) 353-9991
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐
|
Smaller reporting company ☒
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No.
Class
|
|
Outstanding at February 10, 2017
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
9,030,000
|
PART I.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
1
|
Item 1.
|
1
|
|
Item 2.
|
14
|
|
Item 3.
|
17
|
|
Item 4.
|
17
|
|
PART II.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
18
|
Item 1.
|
18
|
|
Item 1A.
|
18
|
|
Item 2.
|
18
|
|
Item 3.
|
18
|
|
Item 4.
|
18
|
|
Item 5.
|
18
|
|
Item 6.
|
19
|
|
20
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Financial Statements
|
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 (UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
DECEMBER 31, 2016
|
SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash and equivalents
|
$
|
6,847,727
|
$
|
8,165
|
||||
Prepaid expenses
|
6,667
|
8,532
|
||||||
Total current assets
|
6,854,394
|
16,697
|
||||||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
|
||||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
-
|
2,258
|
||||||
Total non-current assets
|
-
|
2,258
|
||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$
|
6,854,394
|
$
|
18,955
|
||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$
|
3,204
|
$
|
7,742
|
||||
Accounts payable - related parties
|
-
|
27,405
|
||||||
Convertible note
|
6,869,818
|
-
|
||||||
Total current liabilities
|
6,873,022
|
35,147
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
6,873,022
|
35,147
|
||||||
CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 75,000,000 shares
authorized; 9,030,000 shares issued and outstanding
as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016
|
9,030
|
9,030
|
||||||
Additional paid in capital
|
66,885
|
31,770
|
||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(94,543
|
)
|
(56,992
|
)
|
||||
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
(18,628
|
)
|
(16,192
|
)
|
||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$
|
6,854,394
|
$
|
18,955
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,500
|
||||
Cost of revenue
|
-
|
1,950
|
||||||
Gross profit
|
-
|
4,550
|
||||||
Operating expenses
|
||||||||
Compensation - officers
|
-
|
1,050
|
||||||
General and administrative
|
37,370
|
2,644
|
||||||
Total operating expenses
|
37,370
|
3,694
|
||||||
Income (Loss) from operations
|
(37,370
|
)
|
856
|
|||||
Non-operating expenses
|
||||||||
Financial expense
|
181
|
-
|
||||||
Total non-operating expenses, net
|
181
|
-
|
||||||
Income (loss) before income tax
|
(37,551
|
)
|
856
|
|||||
Income tax provision
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(37,551
|
)
|
$
|
856
|
|||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
9,030,000
|
5,500,000
|
||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
9,677,157
|
5,500,000
|
||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(0
|
)
|
$
|
0
|
|||
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
$
|
(0
|
)
|
$
|
0
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
|
||||||||
2016
|
2015
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(37,551
|
)
|
$
|
856
|
|||
Adjustments to reconcile income including noncontrolling
interest to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
189
|
316
|
||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
-
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|||||
Prepaid expenses
|
-
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(4,538
|
)
|
(7,915
|
)
|
||||
Accounts payable - related party
|
-
|
3,000
|
||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(41,900
|
)
|
(12,243
|
)
|
||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Increase in paid in capital
|
11,645
|
-
|
||||||
Proceeds from convertible note
|
6,869,818
|
-
|
||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
6,881,462
|
-
|
||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
|
6,839,562
|
(12,243
|
)
|
|||||
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
8,165
|
13,581
|
||||||
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
6,847,727
|
$
|
1,338
|
||||
Supplemental cash flow data:
|
||||||||
Income tax paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Interest paid
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Liabilities assumed by shareholders
|
$ | 23,470 | - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 (UNAUDITED) AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
Note 1 – Organization and Operations
Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Fuse Enterprises”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013. Fuse Enterprises Inc. is a full service online marketing agency. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc, (“Fuse Processing”) in the State of California. Fuse Processing is seeking opportunities in the mining business and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America. The Company is the sole shareholder of Fuse Processing. On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Fuse Enterprises, representing 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for an aggregate purchase price of $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company.
Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The interim consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2016, and for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures, which are normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have not been included. The interim consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, previously filed with the SEC.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include all significant normal and recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair statement of the Company’s interim consolidated financial position as of December 31, 2016, its interim consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, as applicable, have been made. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.
Development Stage Company
Fuse Enterprises Inc. is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Although the Company has recognized nominal amounts of revenue, it is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business. All losses accumulated since its inception on December 24, 2013 have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation.
The amendments in this Update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.
For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Fuse Enterprises adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. The adoption of this ASU allows the Company to remove the inception to date information and all references to the development stage.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
(i)
|
Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
|
(ii)
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors;
|
These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level
|
|
1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
|
Level
|
|
2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
|
Level
|
|
3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
|
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
Plant, Property and Equipment
Plant, property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; while additions, renewals and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is included in operations. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets with 10% salvage value and estimated lives as follows:
Building and workshops
|
20 years
|
Computer and office equipment
|
5 years
|
Office furniture
|
7 years
|
Decoration and renovation
|
10 years
|
Machinery
|
10 years
|
Autos
|
5 years
|
Depreciation of plant, property and equipment attributable to manufacturing activities is capitalized as part of inventories, and expensed to cost of goods sold when inventories are sold.
Related Parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include: a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of financial statements is not required in those statements.
The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.
In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with its customer with revenues being generated upon rendering of services. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice; service is considered provided when the service is delivered to the customers; and the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.
Income Tax Provision
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 740-10-25 at December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016.
Earnings per Share
Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method for the outstanding unvested restricted stock, options and warrants, and the if-converted method for the outstanding convertible instruments. Under the treasury stock method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later) and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Under the if-converted method, outstanding convertible instruments are assumed to be converted into common stock at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later).
The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
|
Three months Ended
December 31,
|
|||||||
|
2016
|
2015
|
||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(37,551
|
)
|
$
|
856
|
|||
|
||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
|
9,030,000
|
5,500,000
|
||||||
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Convertible notes
|
647,157
|
-
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
|
9,677,157
|
5,500,000
|
||||||
Earnings (loss) per share – basic
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
0.00
|
|||
Earnings (loss) per share – diluted
|
$ |
(0.00
|
) |
$
|
0.00
|
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern. This standard requires management to evaluate for each annual and interim reporting period whether it is probable that the reporting entity will not be able to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. If the entity is in such a position, the standard provides for certain disclosures depending on whether or not the entity will be able to successfully mitigate its going concern status. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-11, Inventory, which requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, the amendments eliminate the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605 - Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue versus Net). In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of ASU 2014-09 and 2014-16, and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. These ASUs clarify the implementation guidance on a few narrow areas and adds some practical expedients to the guidance Topic 606. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which includes amendments to accounting for income taxes at settlement, forfeitures, and net settlements to cover withholding taxes. The amendments in ASU 2016-09 are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted but requires all elements of the amendments to be adopted at once rather than individually. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Note 3 – Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $94,543 at December 31, 2016, working capital deficit of $18,628 and net loss of $37,551 for the three months ended December 31, 2016, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private or public offering. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds on reasonable terms and conditions, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Note 4 – Property and Equipment
Property and equipment at December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:
|
Estimated
Useful Lives
(Years)
|
December 31,
2016
|
September 30,
2016
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Computer equipment
|
5
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
3,089
|
||||||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
-
|
(1,556
|
)
|
||||||||
Computer equipment, net
|
-
|
1,533
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Office furniture
|
7
|
-
|
1,289
|
||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
-
|
(564
|
)
|
||||||||
Office furniture, net
|
-
|
725
|
|||||||||
Total property and equipment, net
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
2,258
|
Depreciation expense
Depreciation expense for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $189 and $316, respectively.
Note 5 – Related Party Transactions
Consulting services from President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Consulting services provided by the President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2016
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
||||||||
President, Chief Executive Officer
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,500
|
||||
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
|
-
|
1,500
|
||||||
|
$
|
-
|
*
|
$
|
3,000
|
Accounts Payable – Related Parties
As of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 the Company owed its directors and officers $0 and $27,405 respectively.
Note 6 – Convertible Note
On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with one of its major shareholders. Under the Agreement, the Company sold a Convertible Promissory Note to the lender with a principal amount of $6,869,818 and a 6% annual interest rate (the “Note”). The Note will mature on the date that is twenty-four months from the original issue date, and any outstanding principal and interest on the Note may be converted at any time prior to maturity at the lender’s option at a conversion price of $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock. There is no beneficial conversion feature for the Note due to the conversion price being higher than the stock price at the time of the issuance of the Note.
Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity
Shares Authorized
Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is seventy-five million (75,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.
Common Stock
In October 2014, the Company sold 5,500,000 shares of its common stock to its directors at par value for an aggregate purchase price of $5,500 in cash.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold 3,530,000 common shares at $0.01 per share for total proceeds of $35,300.
Paid in Capital
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the former shareholder paid certain expenses and liabilities for the Company in the amount of $35,115, which was recorded as an increase of paid in capital.
Note 8 – Income Tax
Deferred Tax Assets
At December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $94,543 and $56,992, respectively, which may be offset against future taxable income through 2034. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $23,398, was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a full valuation allowance.
Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
December 31,
2016
|
September 30,
2016
|
||||||
Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:
|
||||||||
Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards
|
$
|
23,398
|
$
|
8,549
|
||||
Less valuation allowance
|
(23,398
|
)
|
(8,549
|
)
|
||||
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.
Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations
A reconciliation of the consolidated federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:
|
For the Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2016
|
For the Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Federal statutory income tax expense (benefit) rate
|
(15.00
|
)%
|
15.00
|
%
|
||||
Effect of State income tax expense (benefit) rate to federal tax
|
1.33
|
%
|
-
|
%
|
||||
State statutory income tax (benefit) rate
|
(8.84
|
)%
|
-
|
%
|
||||
Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards
|
22.51
|
%
|
(15.00
|
)%
|
||||
Effective income tax rate
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
The Company follows ASC 740 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Under ASC 740, tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are tax benefits claimed in our tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. The Company had no liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016.
The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. For the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not recognize any interest or penalties in the consolidated statement of operations, nor did the Company have any interest or penalties accrued in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016 relating to unrecognized tax benefits.
The tax years 2015-2016 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
Note 9 – Concentrations
Customers:
The following table sets forth information as to each customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2016
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Company A
|
-
|
%
|
46.15
|
%
|
||||
Company B
|
-
|
%
|
53.85
|
%
|
||||
|
-
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
Note 10 – Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in ASC 855-10 for the disclosure of subsequent events. In January 2017, the Company's subsidiary paid $3 million to two nonaffiliated companies for mining equipment purchase and startup capital for the mining business.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
DISCLAIMER REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes in Item I above and with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, and with the information under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in this report and those discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Fuse Enterprises Inc. (the “Company” or “Fuse Enterprises” or “We”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 24, 2013. Fuse Enterprises Inc. is a full service online marketing agency. On December 6, 2016, the Company incorporated Fuse Processing, Inc, (“Fuse Processing”) in the State of California. Fuse Processing is seeking business opportunities in the mining business and is currently investigating potential mining targets in Asia and North America. Fuse Enterprises is the sole shareholder of Fuse Processing. On November 28, 2016, 5,500,000 shares of the common stock of Fuse Enterprises, representing 60.91% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, were sold by Pavel Mikhalkov and Aleksandr Kriukov in a series of private transactions to a new shareholder for an aggregate purchase price of $55,000 (collectively, the “Stock Sales”). In connection with the Stock Sales, Messrs. Mikhalkov and Kriukov released the Company from certain liabilities and obligations arising out of their service as directors and officers of the Company.
Results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Revenue
We generate revenue from sales of our marketing and web development services directly to small and medium-sized business. We acquire customers through direct telemarketing, referrals and our primary website that provides a description of our company and our service offerings (www.fuseenterprises.com).
Our gross revenue from consulting services related to website development, SEO consulting and online marketing for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0 and $6,500, respectively. Our cost of revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0 and $1,950, respectively, resulting in a gross profit of $0 and $4,550 for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company did not generate any revenue during the three months ended December 31, 2016 due to the fact the Company did not receive any new orders for our consulting and website development services and the Company is also in the process of transforming its business by seeking new business opportunities.
Costs and Expenses
The major components of our expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are outlined in the table below:
|
For the Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2016
|
For the Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2015
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Compensation - officers
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,050
|
$
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|||||
General and administrative
|
37,370
|
2,644
|
34,726
|
|||||||||
|
$
|
37,370
|
$
|
3,694
|
$
|
33,676
|
The increase in our operating costs for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to three months ended December 31, 2015, was due to an increase in salary expenses of $10,833, an increase in travel expenses of $9,335, an increase in consulting fees of $5,544, and an increase in accounting and auditing expenses of $5,750, as a result of the Company becoming more aggressive in seeking business opportunities for its development and expansion.
Consulting services provided by the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2016
|
For the
Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
||||||||
President, Chief Executive Officer
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,500
|
||||
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
|
-
|
1,500
|
||||||
|
$
|
-
|
*
|
$
|
3,000
|
Accounts Payable – Related Parties
As of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the Company owed its directors and officers $0 and $27,405 respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
As of
|
As of
|
||||||
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
||||||
|
2016
|
2016
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Total current assets
|
$
|
6,854,394
|
$
|
16,697
|
||||
Total current liabilities
|
(6,873,022
|
)
|
(35,147
|
)
|
||||
Working capital (deficiency)
|
$
|
(18,628
|
)
|
$
|
(18,450
|
)
|
Liquidity
Our internal liquidity is provided by our operations. During the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company reported net loss from operations of $37,551 and net income from operations of $856, respectively.
If we are not successful in expanding our clientele base, maintaining profitability and positive cash flow, additional capital may be required to maintain ongoing operations. We have explored and are continuing to explore options to provide additional financing to fund future operations as well as other possible courses of action. Such actions include, but are not limited to, securing lines of credit, sales of debt or equity securities (which may result in dilution to existing shareholders), loans and cash advances from our directors or other third parties, and other similar actions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding (if needed), on acceptable terms or at all, through a sale of our common stock, loans from financial institutions, our directors, or other third parties, or any of the actions discussed above. If we cannot sustain profitable operations, and additional capital is unavailable, lack of liquidity could have a material adverse effect on our business viability, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Cash Flows
The table below, for the period indicated, provides selected cash flow information:
|
For the Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2016
|
For the Three Months
Ended
December 31, 2015
|
||||||
|
||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
$
|
(41,900
|
)
|
$
|
(12,243
|
)
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
6,881,462
|
-
|
||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
$
|
6,839,562
|
$
|
(12,243
|
)
|
We have generated revenues of $0 and $6,500 during the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we received proceeds of $6,869,818 from sale of a convertible note and $11,645 from capital contributions.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our cash used in operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $41,900 and $12,243, respectively. The increase in net cash used in operating activities was mainly due to increased net loss.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
We did not generate any cash from investing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we received proceeds of $11,645 through the payment of certain expenses made by our management as capital contributions, and $6,869,818 from issuing a convertible note to one of our major shareholders. We did not generate any cash from financing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2015.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2016, we did not have any significant off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Not applicable.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the end of the period covered by this report that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to a material weakness. The material weakness relates to our having one employee assigned to positions that involve processing financial information, resulting in a lack of segregation of duties so that all journal entries and account reconciliations are reviewed by someone other than the preparer, heightening the risk of error or fraud. If we are unable to remediate the material weakness, or other control deficiencies are identified, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately, prevent fraud or file our periodic reports as a public company in a timely manner. Due to our small size and the early stage of our business, segregation of duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. We have limited capital resources and have given priority in the use of those resources to our business development efforts. As a result, we have not been able to take steps to improve our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2016. However, we continue to evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures on an on-going basis. As our operations grow and become more complex, we intend to hire additional personnel in financial reporting and other areas. However, there can be no assurance of when, if ever, we will be able to remediate the identified material weaknesses.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
|
We may from time to time be party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. As we grow and gain prominence in the marketplace we may become party to an increasing number of litigation matters and claims. The outcome of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and the resolution of these matters could materially affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings.
Item 1A.
|
Not applicable.
Item 2.
|
On December 19, 2016, the Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with one of its major shareholders. Under the Agreement, the Company sold a Convertible Promissory Note to the lender with a principal amount of $6,869,818 and a 6% annual interest rate (the “Note”). The Note will mature on the date that is twenty-four months from the original issue date, and any outstanding principal and interest on the Note may be converted at any time prior to maturity at the lender’s option at a conversion price of $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock. The Agreement was executed pursuant to an exemption from registration under Regulation S. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the Note for operating expenses and the expansion of its business.
Item 3.
|
None.
Item 4.
|
Not applicable.
Item 5.
|
None.
Item 6.
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
10.1
|
||
31.1
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document*
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document*
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Label Linkbase Document*
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*
|
*
|
filed herewith
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
FUSE ENTERPRISES INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Yong Zhang
|
|
|
Yong Zhang
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roy Kang
|
|
|
Roy Kang
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2017
|
20