Fuse Science, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 December (Form 10-Q)
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
Quarter Ended: December 31, 2009
Commission
File Number: 000-22991
DOUBLE EAGLE HOLDINGS,
LTD.
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
NEVADA
|
87-0460247
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
7633 E 63RD PLACE, SUITE 220, TULSA,
OK 74133
(Address
of principal executive office)
(918) 461-1667
(Issuer's
telephone number)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer
¨ Smaller reporting
company x.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The
number of shares outstanding of registrant's common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, as of February 15, 2010 was 50,925,820.
DOUBLE
EAGLE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(DEVELOPMENT
STAGE COMPANIES)
INDEX
Page
|
|||
No.
|
|||
Part
I
|
Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1:
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
||
Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009
|
3
|
||
Statements
of Operations – For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and
from inception (January 20, 2009) through December 31,
2009
|
4
|
||
Statements
of Cash Flows – For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and
from inception (January 20, 2009) through December 31,
2009
|
5
|
||
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
6
|
||
Item
2:
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
19
|
|
Item
3:
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
|
22
|
|
Item
4:
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
Part
II
|
Other
Information
|
23
|
|
Item
1:
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
|
Item
1A:
|
Risk
Factors
|
23
|
|
Item
2:
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23
|
|
Item
3:
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
23
|
|
Item
4:
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
23
|
|
Item
5:
|
Other
Information
|
23
|
|
Item
6:
|
Exhibits
|
23
|
|
Signatures
|
24
|
||
Exhibits
|
2
DOUBLE
EAGLE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(Development
Stage Companies)
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December
31, 2009 and September 30, 2009
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 2,407 | $ | 582 | ||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
2,407 | 582 | ||||||
Available-for-sale
investments - affiliates
|
26,576 | 179,495 | ||||||
Notes
and accrued interest receivable - affiliate
|
59,619 | 57,819 | ||||||
$ | 88,602 | $ | 237,896 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
74,465 | 75,094 | ||||||
Accounts
payable - related parties
|
81,154 | 97,854 | ||||||
Convertible
notes payable - related party
|
100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses - related party
|
4,356 | 2,844 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue - related party
|
7,333 | - | ||||||
Advances
from related parties
|
63,310 | 31,660 | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
330,618 | 307,452 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 12,500 shares; no shares issued and
outstanting; $100 per share liquidation preference
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; 50,925,820 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and September 30,
2009
|
50,926 | 50,926 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
9,946,022 | 9,946,022 | ||||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
(126,340 | ) | - | |||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(117,354 | ) | 31,085 | |||||
Accumulated
deficit:
|
||||||||
During
the development stage
|
(118,417 | ) | (97,895 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(9,876,853 | ) | (9,999,694 | ) | ||||
Total
accumulated deficit
|
(9,995,270 | ) | (10,097,589 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
(242,016 | ) | (69,556 | ) | ||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
|
$ | 88,602 | $ | 237,896 |
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
DOUBLE
EAGLE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(Development
Stage Companies)
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and from Inception
(January
20, 2009) through December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Development
|
||||||||||||
Stage
|
||||||||||||
Inception
|
||||||||||||
(January 20, 2009)
|
||||||||||||
Through
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||
Management
income - related party
|
$ | 1,467 | $ | - | $ | 4,034 | ||||||
Total
income
|
1,467 | - | 4,034 | |||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||
Related
party services
|
6,000 | 24,869 | 64,039 | |||||||||
General
and administrative expense
|
6,495 | 31,876 | 22,641 | |||||||||
12,495 | 56,745 | 86,680 | ||||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(11,028 | ) | (56,745 | ) | (82,646 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income - related party
|
1,799 | 1,579 | 6,486 | |||||||||
Interest
expense - related party
|
(1,512 | ) | - | (4,356 | ) | |||||||
Realized
gain (loss) - related party
|
- | - | (24,500 | ) | ||||||||
Other
than temporary decline in available-for-sale securities
|
(13,280 | ) | - | (16,900 | ) | |||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(12,993 | ) | 1,579 | (39,270 | ) | |||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(24,021 | ) | (55,166 | ) | (121,916 | ) | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Net
loss before non-controlling interest
|
(24,021 | ) | (55,166 | ) | (121,916 | ) | ||||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
- | 17,136 | 3,499 | |||||||||
Net
loss
|
(24,021 | ) | (38,030 | ) | (118,417 | ) | ||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (none attributed to the
non-controlling interest)
|
(148,439 | ) | (207,000 | ) | (189,824 | ) | ||||||
Net
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (172,460 | ) | $ | (245,030 | ) | $ | (308,241 | ) | |||
Loss
per share, basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
50,925,820 | 50,795,385 |
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
DOUBLE
EAGLE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(Development
Stage Companies)
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and from Inception
(January
20, 2009) through December 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
Development
|
||||||||||||
Stage
|
||||||||||||
Inception
|
||||||||||||
(January 20, 2009)
|
||||||||||||
Through
|
||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
Operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (24,021 | ) | $ | (38,030 | ) | $ | (118,417 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net
cash used in operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Other
than temporary decline in available-for-sale securities
|
13,280 | - | 16,900 | |||||||||
Gain
(loss) on sale/impairment of investment in related party
|
- | - | 24,500 | |||||||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
- | (17,136 | ) | (3,499 | ) | |||||||
Amortization
of deferred revenue - related party
|
(1,467 | ) | - | (1,467 | ) | |||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable and accrued interest - related parties
|
(1,800 | ) | 2,189 | (6,486 | ) | |||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(629 | ) | 18,026 | 27,633 | ||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses - related parties
|
(15,188 | ) | 15,530 | 18,468 | ||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(29,825 | ) | (19,421 | ) | (42,368 | ) | ||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Common
stock issued for cash
|
- | 10,000 | - | |||||||||
Advances
from related parties for working capital
|
31,650 | 5,000 | 38,310 | |||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
31,650 | 15,000 | 38,310 | |||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,825 | (4,421 | ) | (4,058 | ) | |||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
582 | 10,886 | 6,465 | |||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 2,407 | $ | 6,465 | $ | 2,407 | ||||||
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest and income taxes:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Note
payable issued to acquire investment
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 100,000 | ||||||
Accrued
interest receivable included in amended note
|
- | - | 3,589 |
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
DOUBLE
EAGLE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARY
(DEVELOPMENT
STAGE COMPANIES)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE
1: ORGANIZATION
CONSOLIDATION
POLICY AND HISTORY OF BUSINESS
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Double Eagle Holdings,
Ltd. ("DEGH") and Ultimate Social Network, Inc. ("USN") its 60% subsidiary
(collectively the "Company"). All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. DEGH was
originally incorporated in 1985 in Nevada. Its securities now trade
on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol DEGH.
SHAREHOLDER
ACTIONS
The
holders of a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock,
pursuant to a written consent in lieu of a meeting, in accordance with the
Company’s certificate of incorporation and Nevada Law, have approved the
withdrawal of the Company’s election to be treated as a business development
company ("BDC") under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940
Act").
Withdrawal
of the Company’s election to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act became
effective on January 20, 2009, when the Company filed Form N-54c with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
GENERAL
The
financial statements included in this report have been prepared by the Company
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim reporting and
include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation. These
financial statements have not been audited.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations for interim
reporting. The Company believes that the disclosures contained herein are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. However, these
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report for the year ended
September 30, 2009, which is included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2009. The financial data for the interim periods presented
may not necessarily reflect the results to be anticipated for the complete
fiscal year.
In
preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Company's
management, events that have occurred after December 31, 2009, up until the
issuance of the financial statements, which occurred on February 22,
2010.
6
FINANCIAL
STATEMENT REPORTING
The
Company filed Form N-54c with the SEC on January 20, 2009 indicating the
withdrawal of its election to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act, which
resulted in a change in its method of accounting. BDC financial
statement presentation and accounting uses the value method of accounting used
by investment companies, which allows BDCs to value their investments at fair
value as opposed to historical cost. In addition, entities in which
the Company owns a majority are not consolidated; rather the investments in
these entities are reflected on the balance sheet as an investment in a
majority-owned portfolio company at fair market value. Our
investments will be accounted for as either marketable equity securities,
available for sale securities, at amortized cost, or under the equity
method. In addition, our statements will be consolidated with our
majority owned subsidiary.
The
accounting change shall be retrospectively applied to the financial statements
of all prior periods presented to show financial information for the new
reporting entity for those periods. Previously issued interim
financial statements shall be presented on a retrospective basis.
DEVELOPMENT
STAGE
At the
time of filing Form N-54c with the SEC on January 20, 2009, the Company had
limited resources and did not have sufficient capital to complete its business
plans. Accordingly, the operations of the Companies are presented as
those of a development stage enterprise, from its inception (January 20,
2009).
GOING
CONCERN
The
Company has not established sources of revenue sufficient to fund the
development of business, projected operating expenses and commitments for the
next twelve months. The Company had a net loss from operations of
$24,021, recognized an unrealized loss on investments of $148,439 resulting in a
comprehensive loss of $172,460 during the three months ended December 31,
2009. At December 31, 2009, current assets, excluding investments,
are $2,407 and current liabilities are $330,618.
The
Company expects to raise necessary capital from the private placement of its
restricted common stock. The Company has demonstrated an ability to
raise funds as needed to fund operations and investments to complete its
business plan. However, there can be no assurance that the planned
sale of common stock will provide sufficient funding to develop the Company’s
current business plan.
These
conditions raise some doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. However, the funds raised to date substantially eliminate
the likelihood that the Company will not continue as a going
concern.
RECLASSIFICATION
Certain
reclassifications have been made in the condensed consolidated financial
statements at December 31, 2008 and for the three months then ended to conform
to the December 31, 2009 presentation. The reclassifications had no
effect on net loss.
7
FISCAL
YEAR
Fiscal
2010 refers to periods in the year ending September 30, 2010. Fiscal
2009 refers to periods in the year ended September 30, 2009.
INVESTMENTS
Investments
are classified into the following categories:
|
·
|
Trading
securities reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses
included in earnings;
|
|
·
|
Available-for-sale
securities reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of
applicable deferred income taxes, reported in other comprehensive
income;
|
|
·
|
Held-to-maturity
securities and other investments reported at amortized cost;
and
|
|
·
|
Investments
using the equity method of
accounting.
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Below is
a listing of the most recent accounting standards and their effect on the
Company.
In
January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-03 (ASU 2010-03), Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas (Topic
932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures. This amendment
to Topic 932 has improved the reserve estimation and disclosure requirements by
(1) updating the reserve estimation requirements for changes in practice and
technology that have occurred over the last several decades and (2) expanding
the disclosure requirements for equity method investments. This is
effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 31,
2009. However, an entity that becomes subject to the disclosures
because of the change to the definition oil- and gas- producing activities may
elect to provide those disclosures in annual periods beginning after December
31, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company
does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-03 to have any effect on the
financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-02, Consolidation
(Topic 810): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a
Subsidiary. This amendment to Topic 810 clarifies, but does not
change, the scope of current US GAAP. It clarifies the decrease in
ownership provisions of Subtopic 810-10 and removes the potential conflict
between guidance in that Subtopic and asset derecognition and gain or loss
recognition guidance that may exist in other US GAAP. An entity will
be required to follow the amended guidance beginning in the period that it first
adopts FAS 160 (now included in Subtopic 810-10). For those entities
that have already adopted FAS 160, the amendments are effective at the beginning
of the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15,
2009. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to the first period that
an entity adopted FAS 160. The Company does not expect the provisions
of ASU 2010-02 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company.
In
February 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-08 (ASU 2010-08), Technical Corrections to Various
Topics. This amendment eliminated inconsistencies and outdated
provisions and provided the needed clarifications to various topics within Topic
815. The amendments are effective for the first reporting period
(including interim periods) beginning after issuance (February 2, 2010), except
for certain amendments. The amendments to the guidance on accounting
for income taxes in a reorganization (Subtopic 852-740) should be applied to
reorganizations for which the date of the reorganization is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December
15, 2008. For those reorganizations reflected in interim financial
statements issued before the amendments in this Update are effective,
retrospective application is required. The clarifications of the
guidance on the embedded derivates and hedging (Subtopic 815-15) are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to
existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features
at the date of adoption. The Company does not expect the provisions
of ASU 2010-08 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of
operations or cash flows of the Company.
In
January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-07 (ASU 2010-07), Not-for-Profit Entities (Topic 958):
Not-for-Profit Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions. This amendment to
Topic 958 has occurred as a result of the issuance of FAS 164. The
Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-07 to have a material effect
on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
In
January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-06 (ASU 2010-06), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements. This amendment to Topic 820 has improved disclosures
about fair value measurements on the basis of input received from the users of
financial statements. This is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-06
to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or
cash flows of the Company.
In
January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-05 (ASU 2010-05), Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic
718). This standard codifies EITF Topic D-110 Escrowed Share
Arrangements and the Presumption of Compensation.
In
January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2010-04 (ASU 2010-04), Accounting for Various Topics—Technical
Corrections to SEC Paragraphs.
8
In
January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-01, Equity (Topic
505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and
Cash (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This
amendment to Topic 505 clarifies the stock portion of a distribution to
shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a limit on
the amount of cash that will be distributed is not a stock dividend for purposes
of applying Topics 505 and 260. Effective for interim and annual periods ending
on or after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a retrospective
basis. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-01 to
have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company.
In
December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-17,
Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises
Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This Accounting Standards
Update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for Statement
167. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 (ASC Topic 810),
“Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”). SFAS
167 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities.
The provisions of SFAS 167 significantly affect the overall consolidation
analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS 167 is effective
as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
2009. SFAS 167 will be effective for the Company beginning in 2010. The Company
does not expect the provisions of SFAS 167 to have a material effect on the
financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
In
December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers
and Servicing (Topic 860): Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification for Statement 166. In June 2009, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 166, (ASC Topic 860) “Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). The
provisions of SFAS 166, in part, amend the derecognition guidance in FASB
Statement No. 140, eliminate the exemption from consolidation for qualifying
special-purpose entities and require additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is
effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an
entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. SFAS 167 will be
effective for the Company beginning in 2010. The Company does not
expect the provisions of SFAS 166 to have a material effect on the financial
position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-15, Accounting
for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance
or Other Financing. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB
Accounting Standard Codification for EITF 09-1. In July 2009, the
FASB ratified the consensus reached by EITF (Emerging Issues Task Force) issued
EITF No. 09-1, (ASC Topic 470) “Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance” (“EITF 09-1”). The
provisions of EITF 09-1, clarifies the accounting treatment and disclosure of
share-lending arrangements that are classified as equity in the financial
statements of the share lender. An example of a share-lending
arrangement is an agreement between the Company (share lender) and an investment
bank (share borrower) which allows the investment bank to use the loaned shares
to enter into equity derivative contracts with investors. EITF 09-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and
requires retrospective application for all arrangements outstanding as of the
beginning of fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2009. Share-lending arrangements that have been terminated as a
result of counterparty default prior to December 15, 2009, but for which the
entity has not reached a final settlement as of December 15, 2009 are within the
scope. Effective for share-lending arrangements entered into on or
after the beginning of the first reporting period that begins on or after June
15, 2009. EITF 09-1 will be effective for the Company in
2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of EITF 09-1 to have
a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company.
9
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-14, Software
(Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software
Elements. This update changed the accounting model for revenue
arrangements that include both tangible products and software
elements. Effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered
into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not
expect the provisions of ASU 2009-14 to have a material effect on the financial
position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, Revenue
Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements. This update addressed the accounting for
multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or
services (deliverables) separately rather than a combined unit and will be
separated in more circumstances that under existing US GAAP. This
amendment has eliminated the residual method of allocation. Effective
prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2009-13 to have a
material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Investments in Certain Entities That
Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). This update
provides amendments to Topic 820 for the fair value measurement of investments
in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its
equivalent). It is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted in financial
statements for earlier interim and annual periods that have not been issued. The
Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2009-12 to have a material effect
on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
In April
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 164, (ASC Topic 810) “Not-for-Profit Entities:
Mergers and Acquisitions – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 142”
(“SFAS 164”). The provisions of SFAS 164 provide guidance on accounting for a
combination of not-for-profit entities either via merger or
acquisition. SFAS 164 is effective for mergers occurring on or after
the beginning of an initial reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2009 and acquisitions occurring on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2009. The Company does not
expect the provisions of SFAS 164 to have a material effect on the financial
position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
10
In
September 2008, the FASB issued exposure drafts that eliminate qualifying
special purpose entities from the guidance of SFAS No. 140 (ASC Topic 860),
“Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities,” and FASB Interpretation 46 (ASC
Topic 810) (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities − an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (ASC Topic 810),”
as well as other modifications. While the proposed revised
pronouncements have not been finalized and the proposals are subject to further
public comment, the Company anticipates the changes will not have a significant
impact on the Company’s financial statements. The changes would be
effective March 1, 2010, on a prospective basis.
FASB ASC Topic 810,
“Consolidation.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic
810, “Consolidation,” amended prior guidance to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Under ASC Topic 810, a non-controlling interest
in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a
component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other
requirements, ASC Topic 810 requires consolidated net income to be
reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and
the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the
consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest.
Further
new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810 amends prior guidance
to change how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently
capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate
an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a
company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly
impact the entity’s economic performance. The new authoritative accounting
guidance requires additional disclosures about the reporting entity’s
involvement with variable-interest entities and any significant changes in risk
exposure due to that involvement as well as its affect on the entity’s financial
statements. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810 was
adopted on October 1, 2009, see Note 5.
2.
|
RESTATEMENT
|
From
April 3, 2007 until January 20, 2009, the Company operated as a BDC under the
1940 Act. As such, the Company was subject to different reporting
requirements and methods of accounting for its investments. With the
change back to being an operating company, the Company is no longer subject to
the requirements of a BDC and was required to retroactively modify its financial
statements as if it were not subject to the requirements of a BDC during all
periods presented.
11
The
following reports the effect of the change on net loss, other comprehensive
income and net loss per share for the three months ended December 31,
2008:
2008
|
||||
Net
decrease in net assets from opeations, as originally
reported
|
$ | (202,375 | ) | |
Net
loss of majority owned subsidiary not previously
consolidated
|
(42,839 | ) | ||
Net
loss before other adjustments
|
(245,214 | ) | ||
Unrealized
loss on marketable equity securities included in
operations
|
207,000 | |||
Elimination
of management fee charged portfolio company
|
(7,500 | ) | ||
Elimination
of interest charged on note written off September 30, 2008
|
(2,582 | ) | ||
Expenses
accrued
|
(6,870 | ) | ||
Net
loss before noncontrolled interest
|
(55,166 | ) | ||
Noncontrolled
interest
|
17,136 | |||
Net
loss as restated
|
(38,030 | ) | ||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||
Unrealized
loss on available-for-sale securities
|
(207,000 | ) | ||
Net
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (245,030 | ) | |
Net
loss per share, basic and diluted:
|
||||
As
originally reported
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | |
Restated
|
$ | (0.00 | ) |
3.
|
INVESTMENTS
IN AFFILIATES
|
Investments
at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 are summarized as
follows:
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
Available-for-sale
securities - affiliates
|
$ | 26,576 | $ | 179,495 | ||||
Notes
receivable due from affiliate, Efftec International, Inc.
|
||||||||
Principal
|
55,089 | 55,089 | ||||||
Accrued
interest
|
4,530 | 2,730 | ||||||
59,619 | 57,819 |
12
Available-for-sale
investments may be summarized as follows:
Realized
|
Unrecognized
|
|||||||||||||||
Holding
|
Holding
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Losses
|
Gains (Losses)
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 21,680 | $ | (13,280 | ) | $ | - | $ | 8,400 | |||||||
North
American Energy
|
135,530 | - | (117,354 | ) | 18,176 | |||||||||||
$ | 157,210 | $ | (13,280 | ) | $ | (117,354 | ) | $ | 26,576 | |||||||
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 12,880 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 12,880 | ||||||||
North
American Energy
|
135,530 | - | 31,085 | 166,615 | ||||||||||||
$ | 148,410 | $ | - | $ | 31,085 | $ | 179,495 |
EFFI has
developed an Internet-based chiller tool which it is installing and selling to
its customer base. The note receivable includes interest at 12%, is
due on April 30, 2010 and is convertible into common stock at $0.035 per share
at December 31, 2009.
North
American Energy Resources, Inc. ("NAEY") is an oil and gas development and
production company with operations currently in Oklahoma. The Company
has determined that the loss on NAEY is temporary and has not been recognized,
based on subsequent trading activity and investment opportunities currently
available to NAEY.
Fair
value for both available-for-sale securities is based on level one inputs, the
posted closing price on December 31, 2009.
4.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The
Company operated as a BDC until January 20, 2009, when it elected to no longer
be treated as a BDC. As a part of its operations and consistent with
the operating parameters of a BDC, the Company developed a number of
relationships with its portfolio company investments, including members of the
Company's board of directors becoming officers and directors of its portfolio
company investments. The Company made loans to the portfolio
companies and entered into management agreements with the portfolio
companies. As a result of operating as a BDC and then converting to
an operating company, a number of its previous relationships are now required to
be categorized as related party transactions, which are described as
follows:
While
operating as a BDC the Company had management contracts and made loans to its
60% owned subsidiary USN. These transactions are eliminated in
consolidation with USN.
Hank
Durschlag, the Company's CEO, is also CEO and a director of Efftec
International, Inc. to whom the Company has made a loan and owns 2,800,000
shares of Efftec common stock at December 31, 2009. The Company
recognized interest income of $1,799 and $1,579 during
fiscal year ended September 30 and 2009,
respectively. The accrued interest receivable balance was $4,530 and
$2,730 at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The
Company's investment in the 2,800,000 shares of common stock of Efftec have been
determined to have an other than temporary decline in value, accordingly, the
investment has been impaired by $13,280 to its current trading
price.
13
The
Company has received non-interest bearing advances from affiliates in the
amounts of $63,310 and $31,660 at December 31, 2009 and September 30,
2009, respectively, as detailed below. MLM Concepts is owned 50% by
Michael D. Pruitt, former CEO and director of the
Company. Chef-on-the-Go is owned by a shareholder of the
Company. Joel Holt is a shareholder of the Company and owns 70% of
ALT Energy, Inc.
Ross
Silvey is a director of the Company and is also CEO and a director of North
American Energy Resources, Inc. ("NAEY"). Director fees were accrued
for Mr. Silvey in the amount of $3,000 in 2009. Mr. Silvey ceased his
direct involvement on the audit committee when the Company ceased operation as a
BDC in January 2009. Mr. Silvey is owed $2,500 at December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009.
G. David
Gordon is corporate counsel and billed legal fees of $6,869 in 2009 and none in
2010. Mr. Gordon was owed $34,654 and $55,354 at December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009, respectively. Mr. Gordon owns 25%
of ALT Energy, Inc. and his wife owns 25% of Zatso, LLC.
Hank
Durschlag, the Company's CEO, had accrued $3,000 and $6,000 for his services as
CEO during 2010 and 2009, respectively. Mr. Durschlag was owed
$12,000 and $9,000 for services at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009,
respectively.
On July
11, 2008, the Company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock to acquire 5% of
ALT Energy, Inc., a private oil and gas company with gas reserves in
Oklahoma. The investment was valued at $24,500 based on the trading
price of the Company's common stock at that time. As a result of a
decline in gas prices, ALT's reserves were fully impaired during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. Accordingly, the Company fully impaired its
investment at that time. ALT is owned 25% by Mr. Gordon and 70% by
Joel Holt, who is also a stockholder of the Company.
On July
31, 2008, the Company converted its loan with NAEY in the amount of $35,530,
including accrued interest, into 153,000 shares of NAEY common
stock. On April 10, 2009, the Company issued a note payable to Avenel
Financial Group in the amount of $100,000 to acquire an additional 149,936
shares of NAEY. Avenel Financial is owned by Michael D. Pruitt and is
an owner of over 5% of the Company's common stock. The note has a
balance of $100,000 with accrued interest of $4,356 and $2,844 at December 31,
2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The 302,936 shares of NAEY
were valued at $18,176 and $166,615 at December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009,
respectively.
BJB
Services, Inc., accountants for the Company, and Jim Reskin, SEC counsel for the
Company, acted as co-compliance officers for the Company from April 5, 2007
until January 20, 2009, which was the period during which the Company was a
BDC.
14
The note
receivable from Efftec International, Inc. was amended on May 1, 2009 and
includes interest at 12%; is due on April 30, 2010; and is convertible into
common stock at $0.035 per share.
The note
payable to Avenel Financial Group includes interest at 6%; is due April 10,
2010; and is convertible into common stock at $0.20 per share.
Related
party amounts included in the balance sheet may be summarized as
follows:
Available-for-sale
securities:
Realized
|
Unrecognized
|
|||||||||||||||
Holding
|
Holding
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||
Cost
|
Losses
|
Gains (Losses)
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 21,680 | $ | (13,280 | ) | $ | - | $ | 8,400 | |||||||
North
American Energy
|
135,530 | - | (117,354 | ) | 18,176 | |||||||||||
$ | 157,210 | $ | (13,280 | ) | $ | (117,354 | ) | $ | 26,576 | |||||||
September 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 12,880 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 12,880 | ||||||||
North
American Energy
|
135,530 | - | 31,085 | 166,615 | ||||||||||||
$ | 148,410 | $ | - | $ | 31,085 | $ | 179,495 |
15
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Notes
and accrued interest receivable - affiliates
|
||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 59,619 | $ | 57,819 | ||||
59,619 | 57,819 | |||||||
Accounts
payable - related parties:
|
||||||||
G.
David Gordon & Associates, P.C. and G. David Gordon
|
$ | 34,654 | $ | 55,354 | ||||
Hank
Durschlag
|
12,000 | 9,000 | ||||||
BJB
Services, Inc.
|
32,000 | 31,000 | ||||||
Ross
Silvey
|
2,500 | 2,500 | ||||||
81,154 | 97,854 | |||||||
Notes
payable - affiliate - Avenel Financial Group
|
$ | 100,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Accrued
interest - affiliate - Avenel Financial Group
|
$ | 4,356 | $ | 2,844 | ||||
Non-interest
bearing advances from affiliates:
|
||||||||
Avenel
Financial Group
|
$ | 20,000 | $ | 20,000 | ||||
Joel
Holt
|
25,650 | - | ||||||
MLM
Concepts
|
10,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
Chef-on-the-Go
|
2,660 | 1,660 | ||||||
G.
David Gordon
|
5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
63,310 | 31,660 | |||||||
Deferred
revenue - Efftec International, Inc.
|
7,333 | - |
16
Transactions
with related parties in the statement of operations for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 include:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Management
income - related party
|
||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 1,467 | - | |||||
1,467 | - | |||||||
Interest
income - affiliates
|
||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | 1,799 | $ | 1,579 | ||||
1,799 | 1,579 | |||||||
Related
party expenses:
|
||||||||
Director
fees - Ross Silvey
|
- | 3,000 | ||||||
Legal
fees - G. David Gordon & Associates, PC
|
- | 6,869 | ||||||
Accounting
services - BJB Services, Inc.
|
3,000 | 9,000 | ||||||
CEO
compensation - Hank Durschlag
|
3,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
6,000 | 24,869 | |||||||
Unrealized
gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities of
affiliates:
|
||||||||
Efftec
International, Inc.
|
$ | - | $ | 28,500 | ||||
North
American Energy Resources, Inc.
|
(148,439 | ) | (235,500 | ) | ||||
(148,439 | ) | (207,000 | ) |
5. APPLICATION
OF FASB ASC TOPIC 810
FASB ASC
Topic 810, "Consolidation," amended prior guidance to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary, which became effective on October 1, 2009 for
the Company. Paragraph 810-10-45-21 requires that the noncontrolling
interest continue to be attributed its share of losses even if that attribution
results in a deficit noncontrolling interest balance. Previously,
when the noncontrolling interest reached zero, the Company discontinued
allocating losses to the noncontrolling interest and recorded 100% of the
loss. At October 1, 2009, the Company had recognized $126,340 in
losses that would be attributed to the noncontrolling interest under the new
guidance. The Company recorded the following adjustment to record the
effect of the new guidance.
Balance
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||
September 30,
|
October 1,
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
Adjustment
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Noncontrolling
interest
|
$ | - | $ | (126,340 | ) | $ | (126,340 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
deficit:
|
||||||||||||
During
the development stage
|
(97,895 | ) | 3,499 | (94,396 | ) | |||||||
Other
|
(9,999,694 | ) | 122,841 | (9,876,853 | ) | |||||||
$ | (10,097,589 | ) | $ | 126,340 | $ | (9,971,249 | ) |
17
6. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
A vendor
of the Company is claiming he is owed $40,200 for services rendered in 2008 and
2009, which amount is included in accounts payable. The attorney for
the vendor has offered to accept $5,000 for full settlement of the
obligation.
18
ITEM
2: MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time
to time, the Company may publish forward-looking statements relative to such
matters as anticipated financial performance, business prospects, technological
developments and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. All statements
other than statements of historical fact included in this section or elsewhere
in this report are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Exchange Act of 1934. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements
include: 1. General economic factors including, but not limited to, changes in
interest rates and trends in disposable income; 2. Information and technological
advances; 3. Competition; and 4. Success of marketing, advertising and
promotional campaigns.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an on-going basis, we
will evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to
revenue recognition, valuation of investments, accrued expenses, financing
operations, contingencies and litigation. We will base our estimates and
judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The
most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our
financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value
of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other
sources. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in
this discussion and analysis and in the "Notes to Financial Statements"
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2009 and 2008.
PLAN
OF OPERATION
On April
5, 2007, we filed a notification under Form N54a with the SEC indicating our
election to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act.
On
January 20, 2009, we filed a notification under Form N54C with the SEC
indicating our withdrawal of our election to be regulated as a BDC under the
1940 Act.
19
Subsequent
to the filing of the Form N-54C with the SEC, the Company has pursued a business
model whereby it would acquire majority ownership stakes in Internet development
companies (the "New Business Model"). In this regard, the Company would
remain active in its majority owned Internet development company, Ultimate
Social Network, Inc. USN has now failed in its development plan and the Company
is seeking other Internet development companies to acquire.
Under the
New Business Model, the Company will at all times conduct its activities in
such a way that it will not be deemed an "investment company" subject to
regulation under the 1940 Act. Thus, it will not hold itself out as being
engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading
in securities. In addition, the Company will conduct its business in such a
manner as to ensure that it will at no time own or propose to acquire
investment securities having a value exceeding 40 percent of the Company's
total assets at any one time.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At
December 31, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $328,211 as compared to a
working capital deficit of $306,870 at September 30, 2009. The primary reason
for the decrease is the reduction in the value of our investment in North
American Energy Resources, Inc.
Our
withdrawal from being regulated and reporting as a BDC eliminates the
availability of the 1-E to raise capital through sale of free trading common
shares. We will need some capital in 2010 which we expect to raise through
private placements of our restricted common stock and loans from related
parties.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 –
Revenues
– We had management income in the three months ended December 31,
2009. We received 2,000,000 shares of Efftec common stock valued at
$8,800, based on the trading price of the Efftec common stock on the date
received, for management services provided to Efftec. The agreement
was for a period of six months, thus $1,467 was reported in the current
quarter.
Costs and
expenses decreased from $56,745 in the fiscal 2009 period to $12,495 in the
fiscal 2010 period.
|
·
|
Related
party services declined from $24,869 in 2009 to $6,000 in
2010. The Company is not currently paying director fees and has
reduced the CEO compensation from $2,000 per month to $1,000 per
month.
|
|
·
|
Other
general and administrative expense declined from $31,876 in 2009 to $6,495
in 2010. This decline is primarily the elimination of costs
associated with USN's website.
|
The
Company recognized an other than temporary decline in available-for-sale
securities in the amount of $13,280 in 2010.
20
Other
comprehensive income (loss) amounted to losses of $148,439 and $207,000 in 2010
and 2009, respectively, primarily from temporary declines in value of the
Company's investment in NAEY.
Our Plan of Operation for
the Next Twelve Months
Management’s
Analysis of Business
The
Company has not established sources of revenue sufficient to fund the
development of business, projected operating expenses and commitments for the
next twelve months. The Company had a loss of $24,021 for the
three months ended December 31, 2009, and had a unrealized loss of
$148,439 on available-for-sale securities for a total comprehensive loss of
$172,460. Expenses have been reduced to the minimum until additional
capital can be obtained.
The
Company expects to raise necessary capital from the private placement of its
restricted common stock. The Company has demonstrated an ability to
raise funds as needed to fund operations and investments to complete its
business plan. However, there can be no assurance that the planned
sale of common stock will provide sufficient funding to develop the Company’s
current business plan.
These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern.
Off Balance Sheet
Arrangements
·
None.
Contractual
Obligations
·
None.
21
ITEM
3:
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM 4:
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed and
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 240.13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2009. Based on
that review and evaluation, which included inquiries made to certain other
employees of the Company, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s current
disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, is not
effective in ensuring that information relating to the Company required to be
disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and
forms, including insuring that such information is accumulated and communicated
to the Company’s management, including the CEO, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure, primarily due to a lack of segregation
of duties due to the Company's small size.
(b) Changes in
Internal Controls
There
have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the
evaluation described above, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
22
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1:
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
ITEM 1A:
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2:
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM 3:
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM 4:
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM 5:
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
We do not
currently employ a Chief Financial Officer. Mr. M.E. Durschlag, Chief
Executive Officer, also serves as Chief Financial Officer.
ITEM 6:
|
EXHIBITS
|
(a)
EXHIBITS
|
31.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
23
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
DOUBLE
EAGLE HOLDINGS, LTD.
|
||
February
22, 2010
|
By: /s/M.E. Durschlag
|
|
M.E.
Durschlag, President,
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer and
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
24